The Orlando Massacre and the Zionist Propaganda of Alex Jones

Updated June 20, 2016



With the Orlando massacre story, Alex Jones and Infowars.com reveal their primary purpose is to serve as a Zionist propaganda outlet, supporting the deception behind the fraudulent War on Terror.

"Terror is theatre... Theatre's a con trick. Do you know what that means? Con trick? You've been deceived. "

- John Le Carré, The Little Drummer Girl, 1983

"Terrorism is aimed at the people watching, not at the actual victims. Terrorism is theater… The normal objective of state or official terrorism is to enforce obedience and cooperation... Success demands the creation of an atmosphere of fear and the seeming omnipresence of the internal security apparatus."

- Brian Michael Jenkins, "International Terrorism: A New Kind of Warfare," Rand Corporation, June 1974

The Israeli construct known as the War on Terror is a global fraud, a Zionist war agenda that is based on deception and false-flag terrorism. In my presentations about the dual-deception of 9/11 and the War on Terror I use the Mossad quote from The Little Drummer Girl, “Terror is theatre... Theatre's a con trick. Do you know what that means? Con trick? You've been deceived.” I advise people to keep this quote in mind whenever an act of terrorism, like the recent massacre in Orlando, occurs.

One needs to remember that the ultimate purpose of false-flag terrorism is to affect public opinion and change the way the target audience thinks about the entity that is blamed. As terrorism expert Brian Michael Jenkins wrote, "Terrorism is aimed at the people watching, not at the actual victims. Terrorism is theater.”

In acts of false-flag terrorism the perpetrators behind the deception come out with information very quickly to create a false narrative, which is then spread by the mainstream media. In the case of the terror attacks of 9/11 this early planting of the false narrative was done by the former Israeli prime minister and chief-of-staff Ehud Barak, who appeared on world-wide BBC World television blaming Osama bin Laden and calling for “an operational, concrete war against terror” – before the Twin Towers had even fallen.



Ehud Barak presented the Israeli narrative of 9/11 on BBC World television - a global network - before the towers even fell.

By appearing on BBC World right after the planes had hit the towers, Barak was making use of the primacy effect and presenting the desired narrative first, before any evidence could even be examined to determine what had really happened on 9/11. In this case, Barak evidently had prior knowledge of the attacks and was prepared to be in the London studio of the BBC World to give the world the Israeli narrative of the crime - and the Israeli cure for the problem: the global War on Terror, something the Israeli military had been pushing since at least 1979. Barak’s early analysis became the official version of 9/11, of course.

In the case of the mass shooting in the Orlando nightclub, the alleged shooter was identified as an American-born Muslim of Afghan origin - before the number of people killed had even been determined. Early on June 12, while the death toll was thought to be twenty, Alex Jones’ Infowars.com reporter Paul Joseph Watson posted a video from Dresden, entitled “The Truth About the Gay Nightclub Massacre,” in which he blamed the Islamic religion for being the root cause of the Orlando massacre. More than 400,000 people watched the inflammatory video in the first day it was online.



Infowars' “The Truth About the Gay Nightclub Massacre”

Video URL - https://youtu.be/zYyrPHg_ag0

There are, of course, many questions about what happened at the Pulse club in the early hours of June 12. The main question being: Was the Orlando nightclub massacre another act of false-flag terror?

Were there multiple shooters as some eyewitnesses have said? How did the media know the name of the alleged shooter before it knew how many people had been killed? Did the shooter really call 911 and make some statement about ISIS and the Boston Marathon bombing? If so, when will we be able to hear it? (The FBI has released "transcripts" of the call but is not releasing the audio. Why will they not release the audio? How do we know that the voice in the video is that of the alleged killer if we cannot hear the actual audio?)

There is also a big question about Alex Jones and the role he plays: Why would Infowars.com post a video that blamed Islam before anything was known about what happened at the Pulse club? Is Alex Jones exploiting the primacy effect for propaganda reasons – just like Ehud Barak?

There are many people who trust Alex Jones to give them the truth about important matters that are not discussed in the mainstream media. Jones has a large following, including many sincere truth-seekers who believe whatever comes from his website. For Infowars.com to post Watson’s three-minute video, “The Truth About the Gay Nightclub Massacre,” and to blame Islam for being the cause of the massacre is worse than irresponsible journalism – it exposes the role played by Alex Jones and Infowars.com as a Zionist propagandist in support of the global criminal fraud known as the War on Terror.



Benjamin Netanyahu's comments on the Orlando shooting are designed to advance the War on Terror, a war agenda being waged by the United States and its allies on behalf of Israel.



Bibi Netanyahu Statement on the Orlando Terror Attack

Video URL: youtu.be/7FBqTgNb5MA

Three days after the Orlando shooting, Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, released a three-minute video in which he said the shooter was "not alone" and went on to blame ISIS and the Islamic Republic of Iran. In doing so, Netanyahu was feeding the War on Terror construct he has promoted since 1979:

In Orlando, a terrorist walks into a nightclub and murders nearly 50 human beings… Why did the terrorist murder them?

Because he was driven by a fanatical hatred. He targeted the LGBT community because he believed they were evil.

Now, the murderer wasn't alone. Regimes and terrorist organizations around the world ruthlessly persecute the LGBT community. In Syria, ISIS throws gays off rooftops. In Iran, the regime hangs gays from cranes...

This week’s shooting wasn’t merely an attack on the LGBT community. It was an attack on all of us, on our common values of freedom and diversity and choice. Radical Islamist terror makes no distinction between shades of infidel. This week it was gays in Orlando. A few days before that it was Jews in Tel Aviv… All of us are targets…

Working together we will defeat them even faster.

The Israeli methods have changed in the four decades since Netanyahu began promoting the War on Terror, but the logic remains exactly the same.



Support Christopher Bollyn's efforts to expose the deception of our time.

Donate here or by PayPal to bollyn@bollynbooks.com

Alex Jones and 9-11 Disinfo

April 25, 2016



Alex Jones' recent interview with Steve Pieczenik is a good example of how Jones misleads the public about who is really behind the false-flag terror atrocity of September 11, 2001. The video is at: https://youtu.be/3ZccwgUtOxU

It seems as though many people in the 9-11 truth movement have a habit of listening to Alex Jones wanting to believe that he is truly a source of honest information and analysis. Unfortunately, especially when it concerns 9-11, he is not.

When I speak about my Solving 9-11 research, I am often asked about Alex Jones. A supporter just sent me a link to a 47-minute video between Jones and Dr. Steve Pieczenik, from April 21, in which they discussed who they think was behind 9-11. An analysis of their conversation reveals that Jones controls and dominates the discussion to lead the listener away from the truth about who was behind 9-11. In particular, Jones steers the listener away from understanding that Israeli intelligence played the key role, as the architectural level planner and managerial level operator of the false-flag terror atrocity and the subsequent cover-up.

This should come as no surprise, since Alex Jones has been an outspoken supporter of the "Jewish state of Israel" for many years:



Alex Jones: "I support the Jewish state of Israel." Notice the natural voice compared to the fake gruff voice used by Alex Jones today. Video URL: https://youtu.be/RNseMDToKdk

Jones spends the first twelve minutes of the video promoting himself, boasting that he is the "progenitor" and "father" of 9-11 truth. He finishes his long self-promoting braggadocio saying that "the truth lives here."

When Steve Pieczenik finally gets to speak, he says: "The Neo-Cons, the Neo-Con Jews, Israel, Dubai, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, will all be implicated in 9-11."

Pieczenik goes on to say that dual-national civilians loyal to the state of Israel had taken over the Pentagon under George W. Bush.

He said that he knew immediately on 9-11 that it was a stand-down false-flag terror attack. He said that he got a call from "Israeli operatives" on the morning of 9-11. The Israelis told him that planes had struck the towers and that the towers were or would be collapsing.

Pieczenik said that he told the Israelis that that was impossible. The Israelis then told him that he must be "an Arabist".

He told Jones that at that point he knew who was involved in 9-11. "It was Israel," he told Jones.

Jones then takes a commercial break. When he comes back he spends the next eight minutes defending Israel rather than returning to his guest. In his eight-minute diatribe Jones first takes on some imaginary "white supremacists" who he says just want to "kill all the Jews." He then goes on about Herr Hitler and talks about how he has always defended the little guy against schoolyard bullies because, he says, it is in his genes.

He then says that the "white supremacists" are all controlled factions, telling his viewers and listeners, "I'm a faction that is not controlled." All of this is done to give the listener the idea that Alex Jones is unlike any other source, that he is giving his listeners the unvarnished truth. In this way Jones tries to cultivate a following of devoted listeners who are willing to believe whatever he says, simply because he says it.

Rather than let his highly-esteemed guest talk about who he thinks is behind 9-11, Jones goes on and on about trivial things that are not at all related to the subject. Finally, he lets Dr. Pieczenik say a bit more about 9-11.

"There are no Muslims involved in 9-11," Pieczenik says. "The Muslims were not even on the planes."

If this is true, and the evidence indicates that it is, then the issue of the classified 28 pages is completely irrelevant to 9-11 truth. The fact that a Saudi gave money to two of the alleged hijackers is irrelevant if there were no hijacked planes on 9-11. If the planes that struck the Twin Towers and the Pentagon were not the planes they are said to have been, which seems to be the case, then the Arab "hijackers" are twice removed from the atrocity. They are nothing but Arab patsies framed by Israeli intelligence.

The highest level members of Israeli military intelligence began predicting that "Arab terrorists" would attack the highest towers in New York City in the late 1970s, exactly when the extreme right-wing Likud party of Jewish terrorists came to power. The false-flag terror attacks of 9-11 were predicted by the former chief of the Mossad, Isser Harel, in 1979, and they were depicted on screen by Israel's military intelligence agent in Hollywood, Arnon Milchan, in 1978. Amazing how Israeli intelligence agents could see 9-11 coming.



Arnon Milchan's first film featured a passenger jet crashing into a high-rise tower - in 1978.

Clearly, the plans for 9-11 were on the drawing board at Israeli military intelligence in the late 1970s, when the Zionist terrorist chiefs came to power under Menachem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir's Likud coalition.

This is the same time when Israel became involved in the Afghan-Soviet war, in which it played a major role. As Pakistan's Daily Times Monitor reported in July 2003, "Pakistan Got Israeli Weapons During Afghan War":

Most of the Afghan war against the Soviet Union was fought using Israeli arms supplied after General Zia ul Haq entered into secret deals with Tel Aviv, says a recently published book, Charlie Wilson's War: The Extraordinary Story of the Largest Covert Operation in History.



Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq, the Pakistani general who served as president of Pakistan from 1978 until 1988, made deals with the Israelis and then died in a bizarre plane crash that appears to have been the result of sabotage.

Israel provided arms and training to jihadist forces who were fighting the Soviet-backed Afghan government. As A.Z. Hilali wrote in US-Pakistan Relationship: Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan, thousands of mujahideen fighters, particularly from the Hezb-e Islami faction of Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, were trained by Israeli instructors. The head of Pakistan's ISI agency, Akhtar Abdur Rahman, apparently allowed the Israeli trainers into his country.

This Israeli-armed and trained faction then became Al Qaeda, as The Columbia World Dictionary of Islamism reports: having lost Saudi support when it supported Saddam Hussein and Pakistani support after 1994, "the remainder of Hizb-i Islami merged into al-Qaeda and the Taliban."

Understanding the key role that Israel played in arming and training the jihadist faction that became Al Qaeda is essential to understanding how Israeli intelligence cultivated the Islamist "enemy" that was blamed for 9-11 and against which we have been waging war ever since. It is all a huge deception.

Support Christopher Bollyn's efforts to expose the deception of our time.

Donate here or by PayPal to bollyn@bollynbooks.com

Sources: Hilali, A. Z., US-Pakistan Relationship: Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan, Aldershot: Ashgate (2005) p. 124, cited in "Afghanistan-Israel Relations", Wikipedia, April 25, 2016

The Columbia World Dictionary of Islamism, Olivier Roy, Antoine Sfeir, editors (2007) p.133, cited in "Hezb-e Islami Gulbuddin", Wikipedia, April 25, 2016

Alex Jones Caller Promotes Bollyn 9-11 Books

November 28, 2015



"SOLVING 9-11 ENDS THE WAR" is the theme of my upcoming speaking tour, as it was for the previous tour. Alex Jones uses my theme although he claims to be unaware of my work and efforts, and goes nowhere near explaining what the theme means.

"Maverick from Texas" called into the Alex Jones show the other day to tell Jones about my Solving 9-11 research. The Alex Jones channel has posted a YouTube video of the 5-minute conversation between Maverick and Jones, in which Maverick promotes my work by pointing out the essence of what my research means, while Jones avoids discussing it. This is very telling behavior from the media personality who claims to be the person who started the 9-11 truth movement - literally.

The Maverick-Jones discussion is during the first 4 minutes and 50 seconds of the following video:



"Solving 9/11 Ends the War" - Alex Jones Channel steals my tour slogan without going anywhere near the essence of my research which explains what this slogan means. This is an attempt to hijack people who are searching for information about my Solving 9-11 research by using this slogan. Video Link - youtu.be/sGcb21alfHo

Solzhenitsyn on Bolshevism and the Controlled Media

June 10, 2015

Beware of Fraudsters Using my Name - Bollyn Email Hacked

August 31, 2015



Hello how you? - Do we speak English?

My Yahoo email account was hacked on August 31 and a fraudulent email was sent out by the hackers using my name. This is a FAKE email that says I was robbed in London. (As a matter of fact, the last time I was in London I was detained for a day by unknown gunmen at Heathrow Airport.)

People have been calling me from around the world asking how they can help. I appreciate your concern. We are all fine, thank you.

The email is fake and fraudulent and I hope the FBI will investigate this case of email fraud as they should, but I never seem to hear that they are. In any case, I have fixed the problem with my email security. I have also asked Yahoo to investigate and asked if the FBI investigates such cases.



This email fraud is rather complex. The fraudsters set up an email account that looks very much like mine, using "bollynbooks@yahoo.com" instead of my "bollyn.books@yahoo.com" for my Yahoo email account. They sent the emails to people from my address book by hacking into my real email account.



The good thing is that the fake email does not work, so I don't think anyone lost any money on this fraud. I wrote back to the fake email and got this error message back:

Sorry, we were unable to deliver your message to the following address.

<bollynbooks@yahoo.com>:

Remote host said: 554 delivery error: dd

This user doesn't have a yahoo.com account (bollynbooks@yahoo.com)

This is what the spoof email looked like:

Dutch Newspaper Deletes anti-Bollyn Libel

June 2, 2015

Updated - Dutch paper deletes libellous article in which it called Bollyn "a Holocaust denier."



In their effort to defame me, the editors of Het Parool added a fabricated quote to the printed version of the libel: "The bombing of Dresden, which was the Holocaustof World War II." The false quote is contained within single quotes to make it appear as if these are my words. These are, in fact, not my words but those of the over-zealous editors of Het Parool.



"Sorry, this page could not be found" is the message that now appears when the link to the libellous article entitled "Holocaust deniers to speak at conference in Amsterdam on 9/11" (English translation), is clicked - but there are tens of thousands of copies of the article in print.

The libellous article as it appeared in Het Parool on May 30, 2015, puts a fabricated quote in my mouth, which reads (in English), "The bombing of Dresden, which wasthe Holocaust of World War II." This false quote does not appear in the online version.



The Dutch newspaper Het Parool deleted the on-line version of the libellous article on June 1, but the article appeared in the print version of the paper over the weekend (ca. 80,000 copies). Bollyn informed the editors of the paper by email on Friday evening that he wanted a retraction of the allegation and a written apology by the end of the business day on Monday. He also called the paper on Monday morning and informed them that if this was not forthcoming he would take legal action for defamation.

The text of the article as it appeared online is found with English translation at the bottom of this post.

It is important to understand that this use of a libel to defame me is nothing more than a Zionist "trick", as the former Israeli cabinet minister Shulamit Aloni explained to Amy Goodman, employed to defame critics of Israeli policies. The following short video contains the comments of Shulamit Aloni about how the Zionists use the "anti-Semite" card against American critics and the "Holocaust" card against European critics. She is very candid about how this tactic is applied.



"It's a Trick, We Always Use It." (calling people "anti-Semitic")

Israeli politician Shulamit Aloni explains Zionist Defamation Tactics to Amy Goodman

Video Link - youtu.be/jUGVPBO9_cA

* * *

May 29, 2015

Het Parool, the most widely read newspaper in Amsterdam, published a serious libel against Christopher Bollyn on May 29, 2015. The libel, written by Heiba Targhi Bakkali, states that Bollyn is a "Holocaust denier." This is a particularly serious libel in that it is meant to incite hatred and violence against Bollyn when he comes to speak in Amsterdam at the Open Mind Conference on June 6-7.



DUTCH JOURNALIST Heiba Targhi Bakkali of Het Parool wrote the libelous and inciteful slander: "Bollyn is a Holocaust denier, in that he considers the bombing of Dresden as the Holocaust of World War II."

Libel is defined as "a method of defamation expressed by print, writing, pictures, signs, effigies, or any communication embodied in physical form that is injurious to a person's reputation, exposes a person to public hatred, contempt or ridicule, or injures a person in his/her business or profession." (Legal Information Institute, Cornell University Law School)

The article that contains the libellous statement against Bollyn is entitled,"Ontkenners Holocaust spreken op congres in Amsterdam over 9/11".

The article says, in Dutch:

Bollyn is Holocaustontkenner, in zoverre: hij beschouwt het bombardement op Dresden als de holocaust van de Tweede Wereldoorlog.

Which translates into English as:

Bollyn is a Holocaust denier, in that he considers the bombing of Dresden as the Holocaust of World War II.

In her attempt to portray me an a "Holocaust denier" for the 80,000 weekend readers of Het Parool, Heiba Targhi Bakkali evidently found my article about 9-11 entitled "An American Holocaust" from September 2007, in which I wrote:



I personally know of several actual holocausts in modern times in which there were "massive destruction of humans" by fire caused by other humans: the fire-bombing of German and Japanese cities, most notably Dresden on February 13-14, 1945; the massacre of the Branch Davidians at Waco, Texas on April 19, 1993; and the destruction of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001.



The entire center of Dresden, the beautiful Saxon capital, was completely consumed by fire on Ash Wednesday 1945 after the Anglo-American fire bombing raids of February 13 and 14, 1945. According to August Kuklane, an eyewitness, some 600,000 people, including many thousands of refugees, had been living in the city center that was incinerated as they slept.



The U.S. mass media does not use the term "holocaust" to refer to the destruction of thousands of lives by fire in the World Trade Center because the word has been usurped by Zionist propagandists. The controlled media in the United States also completely avoids discussing the evidence of Israeli prior knowledge of the 9-11 holocaust.



Although it is extremely unpleasant to contemplate, it must be remembered that hundreds of innocent Americans and other people were literally roasted alive in the upper floors of the twin towers before they collapsed. Besides the fires that were caused by the airplane fuel, there is evidence that there were large amounts of Thermite involved in the destruction of the three collapsed towers. Many people chose to jump from the 110-story towers rather than die from the extreme heat they were subjected to.

Ms Bakkali is saying that I am a "holocaust denier" because I have used the word holocaust to refer to the mass murder of thousands of people by fire in Dresden and at the World Trade Center. This is clearly a false representation of my statement about Dresden. I did not say that the fire-bombing of Dresden was "the Holocaust of World War II."





A pile of bodies from the holocaust of Dresden, February 13-15, 1945

Holocaust means complete destruction by fire with extensive loss of life. The English word holocaust comes from the Greek holokauston, which means "that which is completely burnt." That is clearly what happened to the many thousands of victims of the Anglo-American fire-bombing of Dresden on Ash Wednesday/Valentine's Day 1945 and what happened to the 2,600 people who were trapped in the thermite-laden Twin Towers from which molten iron poured before they were pulverized into dust. The murder by heat and fire of the 2,600 people trapped in the Twin Towers is an American holocaust, no question about it.



Molten iron poured from the 81st floor of the South Tower for about 7 minutes before the tower collapsed. Molten iron is about 1,500 degrees C, which means that the people above this floor were being subjected to extreme heat. This is why so many people chose to jump.



Some 2,600 people were killed during the explosive demolitions of the Twin Towers in which everything in the towers was pulverized in explosive thermitic reactions that reached incredibly hot temperatures.

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Libel, definition, Legal Information Institute, Cornell University Law School, Law.Cornell.edu, May 29, 2015

www.law.cornell.edu/wex/libel

"An American Holocaust" by Christopher Bollyn, September 25, 2007

www.bollyn.com/an-american-holocaust/

"Remembering the Fire-Bombing of Dresden" by Christopher Bollyn, February 13, 2013

www.bollyn.com/14044/

"The Passing of Kurt Vonnegut - An Eyewitness to the Holocaust of Dresden" by Christopher Bollyn, April 12, 2007

www.bollyn.com/the-passing-of-kurt-vonnegut/

The text of the article, in Dutch (in italics) and English, as it appeared online:

Ontkenners Holocaust spreken op congres in Amsterdam over 9/11

May 29, 2015 16:00

Bron: Het Parool

Holocaust deniers to speak at conference in Amsterdam on 9/11

May 29, 2015 16:00

Source: Het Parool

Twee Amerikaanse sprekers die te boek staan als antisemitisch brengen volgend weekend in Amsterdam bij de Open Mind Conference hun idee over 9/11 te berde, volgens hen een zionistisch complot.

Two American speakers who are classified as anti-Semitic will spend next weekend in Amsterdam at the Open Mind Conference to present their ideas about 9/11, which is, according to them, a Zionist plot.

Het zijn oud-marinier Ken O'Keefe en journalist Christopher Bollyn. Beiden claimen middels eigen onderzoek de waarheid over 9/11 boven tafel te hebben gekregen. Hun conclusie: Israël zit hier achter. O'Keefe verwijt Israël bovendien de instabiliteit in het Midden-Oosten te veroorzaken, uit expansiedrift.

They are the former marine Ken O'Keefe and journalist Christopher Bollyn. Both claim to have brought the truth about 9/11 to the table through their own research. Their conclusion: Israel is behind it. O'Keefe also criticizes expansionist Israel for causing instability in the Middle East.

Hij wordt geregeld voor commentaar gevraagd bij specifieke internationale nieuwsprogramma's, op zenders als het Engelstalige Iraanse Press TV en het meertalige Russische RT, voorheen Russia Today. In april sprak hij in Londen op een omstreden bijeenkomst waar neonazi en Hitlerbewonderaar Pedro Varela de hoofdgast was.

O’Keefe is regularly invited to comment on specific international news programs, stations, and the English-language Iranian Press TV, and the multilingual Russian RT, formerly Russia Today. In April, he spoke in London at a contentious meeting where neo-Nazi and Hitler admirer Pedro Varela was the chief guest.

Staatsgreep - Coup d'État

Bollyn, getrouwd geweest met een Israëlische vrouw die hij ontmoette in een kibboets, ziet de aanslagen van 9/11 als een Israëlische staatsgreep. Hij schreef de boekenserie Solving 9/11, waarin hij zijn ideeën uit de doeken doet. Hij is verbonden geweest aan American Free Press, een weekblad met een racistische en antisemitische reputatie.

To Bollyn, who was married to an Israeli woman he met in a kibbutz, 9/11 looks like an Israeli coup. He wrote the book series, entitled Solving 9/11, in which he presents his ideas. He has been linked to American Free Press, a weekly newspaper with a racist and anti-Semitic reputation.

Bollyn is Holocaustontkenner, in zoverre: hij beschouwt het bombardement op Dresden als de holocaust van de Tweede Wereldoorlog. De tweedaagse Open Mind Conference wordt voor het eerst in Nederland gehouden, in Oldschool, een zalencentrum in de Rivierenbuurt. Open Mind is een internationaal samenwerkingsverband van aanhangers van uiteenlopende complottheorieën. De afgelopen drie jaar werd het evenement jaarlijks in Denemarken gehouden.

Bollyn is a Holocaust denier, in that he considers the bombing of Dresden asthe Holocaust of World War II. The two-day Open Mind Conference will be held for the first time in the Netherlands, at the Oldschool, a conference center in the River. Open Mind is an international partnership of adherents of various conspiracy theories. The event has been held annually in Denmark for the past three years.

Vergiftigd - Poisoned

De Nederlandse oud-KLM-piloot Willem Felderhof, die zijn werkgever vergeefs aanklaagde omdat hij in het vliegtuig vergiftigd meende te zijn door zenuwgas TCP, haalde het evenement naar Amsterdam.

The former Dutch KLM pilot William Felderhof, who vainly sued his employer because he believed he had been gotten sick from toxic fumes of nerve gas TCP (in the cockpit) on the plane, brought the event to Amsterdam.

Felderhof bestrijdt de kritiek op de twee. 'Wie de waarheid spreekt, wordt al gauw beticht van het aanhangen van complottheorieën of antisemitisme, een manier om ons te diskwalificeren. Het zijn nota bene de Joden die het meest te lijden hebben onder het zionisme.'

Felderhof disputes the criticism of the two speakers. "Whoever speaks the truth is soon accused of adhering to conspiracy theories and anti-Semitism, which is a method that is used to discredit us. It should be noted that it is the Jews who suffer most from Zionism."

Andere sprekers bespreken tijdens de conferentie onder meer de 'valsevlagtheorie' van vlucht MH17, het manipuleren van het weer, de vrijmetselaars en het monetaire stelsel.

Other speakers attending the conference will discuss subjects including the "false flag theory” of flight MH17, weather modification, the Freemasons, and the monetary system.

(Door: Redactie) – (By the Editors)

Anti-Russia Propaganda: Where Does It Take Us?

November 20, 2014

I was surprised to find an article on the website of the New York Review of Books about the recently released photos that allegedly show a fighter jet firing a missile at Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 over the Ukraine last July.



The article by Amy Knight is blatant propaganda in which she blames Russia for the downing of MH17 without providing any evidence. Where is such anti-Russian propaganda meant to take us?

The article, written by Amy Knight, is entitled “Flight MH17: Will Russia Get Away With It?” As the title suggests, the article is accusatory and blames the Russian government for the civil war in the Ukraine, which was actually precipitated by a U.S.-led coup d’étatthat installed an anti-Russian government in a nation with a large Russian-speaking population.

The article begins with an unproven claim that a large number of Russian military convoys invaded the Ukraine last week:

Following the entry of more than 120 Russian military convoys into Ukraine last week, the US and its European allies appear to have reached a turning point in their response to the Ukrainian conflict.

Knight goes on to blame the Kremlin for being involved in the shooting down of Malaysia Airlines MH17, a very serious accusation to make - without providing any evidence:

Judging from Russia’s recent military incursions in Ukraine—and its increasingly provocative and bellicose actions elsewhere in the world—the Kremlin apparently is assuming that the US and its allies will not pursue harsher measures to restrain Putin. This should not come as a surprise. When was the last time a country provided the weapon used to shoot down a passenger jet in a neighboring country, with impunity?

She also addresses the photographs that were shown on Russia’s Channel One on November 14, 2014, which she dismisses as fake:

Just last weekend, a program on Russian Channel One again produced images to show that a Ukrainian fighter plane was near MH17 just before the crash. However, it did not take long for Russian commentators on social media to determine that the photographs were fakes.

I find it very interesting that when it comes to debunking these photos people like Amy Knight take the opinions of “Russian commentators on social media” seriously, while similar American commentators - with professional credentials - who have presented solid evidence that the government/media version of 9-11 is nothing but a pack of lies are completely ignored by her and the media outlets she writes for.

Working on her utterly baseless accusations against Russia, Knight concludes that the West should apply tougher sanctions on the Kremlin and the Russian leader, Vladimir Putin:

Western leaders must keep in mind the lesson of Malaysian Flight MH17—that left undeterred, there is little the Kremlin won’t do in its efforts to assert its dominance over the former Soviet empire. As Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk observed last week: “[Putin] is testing the ground. He will move as far as the world will allow him.”

WHO IS AMY KNIGHT?



Amy W. Knight (born 1946, Chicago) is described as an American historian of the Soviet Union and Russia.

This article is an egregious example of the vicious anti-Russian propaganda found in the controlled media in the West. So, who is Amy Knight, this irresponsible propagandist who makes serious accusations against Russia and then encourages the West to take action based on her assumptions of Russian guilt?

The New York Review of Books offers a very brief biographical sketch of Amy Knight:

Amy Knight is a former Woodrow Wilson fellow. Her books include Who Killed Kirov: The Kremlin’s Greatest Mystery, Spies Without Cloaks: The KGB’s Successors, and How the Cold War Began: The Igor Gouzenko Affair and the Hunt for Soviet Spies.

Wikipedia says that she was born in 1946 and is an American historian of the Soviet Union and Russia. She studied Russian politics at the London School of Economics and Political Science and went on to teach there. It adds that Knight has been described by The New York Times as "the West's foremost scholar" of the KGB, and that she and her husband Malcolm have three children.

So, I asked, who is Malcolm Knight, the husband of the “West’s foremost scholar” on the KGB? Well, Malcolm Knight is certainly no slouch either. He is a Canadian who was the former Senior Deputy Governor of the Bank of Canada (1999-2003) and General Manager and chief executive officer of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) from April 2003 until September 2008. The CEO of the BIS is like being the Capo di tutti capi or "boss of all bosses" of the network of global banksters.





Malcolm Knight was Canada's central banker who then served as CEO of the Bank of International Settlements.

Malcolm Knight was the first person from outside Europe to hold this senior executive position at the BIS in Basel, Switzerland. He went on to serve as Vice Chairman of Deutsche Bank Global Group, based in New York, from October 2008 to March 2012.

Among other duties, Knight was a member of the Financial Stability Forum (now the Financial Stability Board), reporting to the G-8 and G-20 finance ministers on vulnerabilities in the international financial system from 2003 to 2008. Note that his position as an advisor on the “vulnerabilities in the international financial system” ended in 2008, the year of the trillion-dollar bail-out and global financial collapse caused by the unbridled greed of “banksters”.

DOES IT MATTER?

Some might ask, does it really matter that this anti-Russia propagandist Amy Knight is married to one of the top central bankers in the world?



Well, of course, it does. The anti-Russia propaganda campaign is a fundamental part of the economic war against Russia. Vladimir Putin and Russia have successfully resisted the global gangsterism of the international bankers, their controlled media, and the spineless politicians who serve them. Thanks to the level-headed Vladimir Putin and his brilliant foreign minister Sergey Lavrov we have already avoided several wars in the Middle East.



If Amy Knight were truly a serious scholar on Russia, she would not make such serious accusations against the Kremlin without providing solid evidence to support her charges. The fact that she makes such allegations without providing any evidence indicates that she is working as a propagandist to sway public opinion against Vladimir Putin and Russia. This is extremely irresponsible and reckless because it could very well lead to war, which is exactly the way banksters do it.

So, does it matter? Remember that it was very similar baseless allegations about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, made by Judith Miller of the New York Times, that took us to war in Iraq in 2003. That war of aggression wound up lasting a decade, cost our nation trillions of dollars, and destroyed an untold number of lives.



Then think for a minute about where this anti-Russian propaganda campaign is meant to lead us and ask yourself if it’s worth resisting the lies.

Sources: Amy Knight, Wikipedia, November 20, 2014

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy_Knight

Biographical Note for Malcolm D. Knight, Bank of International Settlements, November 20, 2014

www.bis.org/about/biomdk.htm

"Flight MH17: Will Russia Get Away With It?" by Amy Knight, New York Review of Books, November 19, 2014

www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2014/nov/19/flight-mh-17-will-russia-get-away-it/



Malcolm Knight, Wikipedia, November 20, 2014

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malcolm_Knight

"Russia Under Attack" by Christopher Bollyn, February 15, 2014

www.bollyn.com/russia-under-attack/

"The Downing of MH17 - Is Israel Involved?" by Christopher Bollyn, Updated August 13, 2014

www.bollyn.com/14832/

"Understanding the Crisis in Ukraine" by Christopher Bollyn, Updated May 11, 2014

www.bollyn.com/understanding-the-crisis-in-ukraine/

White Pages listings for Malcolm D. and Amy W. Knight in Summit, NJ

www.whitepages.com/name/Malcolm-D-Knight/Summit-NJ/2q2ydqi

Cutting through Israeli Lies and Propaganda about Gaza

July 22, 2014

Hanan Ashrawi, a Palestinian Christian, is a legislator, activist, and scholar. She is also the first woman elected to the Palestinian National Council. In the following interview from "This Week" on ABC News, Ashrawi cuts through the Zionist lies and propaganda about what Israel is really doing in Gaza. Because the mainstream media badly distorts the reality of Israeli aggression against the Palestinian people, it is essential to listen to what Ashrawi says in this interview.



Video Link - youtu.be/pOqA2Afiy9c

Recommended Reading: "Gaza and 9-11: When Silence Means Complicity" by Christopher Bollyn, July 21, 2014

www.bollyn.com/gaza-and-9-11-when-silence-means-complicity/



Bollyn's official page on Facebook: www.facebook.com/bollynbooks911

David Duke and YouTube Censorship

June 7, 2014



David Duke's video promoting The Illustrated Protocols of Zion

A dedicated supporter of 9-11 Truth wrote from Massachusetts telling me that he had posted a comment under a recent YouTube video by David Duke. After checking the comments under the video, I wrote back to inform him that I did not see the comment he had posted.

I informed him that YouTube regularly censors comments about 9-11 videos in such a way that the comment is only visible to the person who posted the comment when he is logged in, but is not seen by the general public. I have taken this matter up with Google/YouTube in the past and have yet to receive a proper response that explains why viewers' comments are being censored.

The problem faced by this supporter of 9-11 Truth is, in my opinion, a good example of the saying, "He who owns the pipeline, controls the product." Google bought YouTube and since they own the pipeline, they decide what messages get posted and which don't. One should not expect free speech on a controlled network.

I am posting the following email because it provides an important lesson in how censorship works on the Internet - in reality. It also gets into the subject of why David Duke, who presents himself as a critic of organized Zionism, completely ignores the evidence of Zionist involvement in the crime of the century: 9/11. How much sense does that make?

The email from my loyal supporter in Massachusetts begins:

Hi David Duke,

Several days ago I posted a comment in the comments section under your new video titled "The Illustrated Protocols of Zion by David Duke". It criticized you for not acknowledging the Jewish role in 9/11 and it questioned whether you were really fighting as a patriot for the truth. However, I have now found that that comment was censored. (This was not immediately evident to me because I needed to sign out of youtube to see that it was censored.) Are the Jews who run youtube censoring comments in your videos to protect your reputation? Or did you censor it?

Here is the comment I posted:

David Duke, this video is good and you have done quite a bit of good work. But I just cannot get past the fact that on probably THE MOST IMPORTANT POINT you defend the enemy completely. For you to keep saying that we just don't know who did 9/11 is a serious shortcoming.

I have heard an interview of Eustace Mullins (by Daryl Bradford Smith on December 16, 2006) in which Mullins says, in so many words, that you are controlled opposition [3:00 to 4:10] and that "David always does what he is told to." [4:07-4:09]



"Eustace Mullins on David Duke, useful idiot”

URL Link - http://youtu.be/vVbmwkFRDRo

Others also say that you are controlled opposition, including John DeNugent. When you combine this with your insistence that we don't know who did 9/11 – when the question of who did it is completely spelled out in Christopher Bollyn's book (Solving 9/11: The Deception That Changed The World) – it is very suspicious. Bollyn is one of the most significant – if not the most significant – researchers of 9/11.

Mike Delaney's video about 9/11, “Missing Links”, which you reportedly had on your website for years, is mostly based on Bollyn's work. If you are NOT an agent, controlled opposition, then I challenge you to read Bollyn's book (if you haven't already) and publish a critique of it on your website publicly explaining why that mountain of evidence contained in those pages is not good enough to conclude that the Israeli Mossad did 9/11 with the help of powerful Jews in the U.S. Then defend yourself from the torrent of criticism that is sure to come now that more and more patriots know who really did 9/11.

Gordon Duff: 9-11 Disinfo Toad

Updated June 2, 2014



DISINFO TOAD Gordon Duff of Veterans Today recently published an article that clearly exposes him as an agent of disinformation who is working to obscure the truth about what happened on 9-11. Why is he doing this and who is he working for?

"About thirty percent of what is on Veterans Today is patently false. About forty percent of what I write is at least purposely partially false, because if I didn't write false information, I wouldn't be alive. I simply have to do that."

- Gordon Duff, Senior Editor of Veterans Today

Source: "Gordon Duff is a Jewish Disinformation Agent"

disinformation - false information that is given deliberately, especially by government organizations

Source: Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary, 7th Edition, 2005

toad - a contemptible, detestable, or disgusting person



DETESTABLE DUFF - The fact that Gordon Duff is a "disinfo toad" is certainly no secret. He has openly admitted that "about thirty percent of what is on Veterans Today is patently false" and that at least forty percent of what he writes is "purposely partially false".

Source: "Gordon Duff is a Jewish Disinformation Agent" (from 5:15 - 5:38)

Disinformation is defined by Merriam-Webster as "false information deliberately and often covertly spread (as by the planting of rumors) in order to influence public opinion or obscure the truth." Gordon Duff, senior editor of the website Veterans Today, published an article on May 20, 2014, that can only be described as rank disinformation that is meant to obscure the truth about 9-11. To deliberately spread lies about what caused the deaths of thousands of people on 9-11 is an egregious and unforgivable offense.

The article, entitled "Too Classified to Publish: Bush Nuclear Piracy Exposed - Russia Opens Files on Nuclear 9/11 and Israeli Proliferation" contains many flagrant errors as it pushes the idea that nuclear bombs were used to bring down the Twin Towers. Duff claims the evidence of a bi-layered composite of super-thermite found in the dust of the towers was somehow produced by the nuclear explosion that destroyed the tower.



EVIDENCE OF EXPLOSIVE THERMITE - Chips of the active thermitic material found in the dust of the destroyed Twin Towers. This material, which was manufactured using nano-technology, is extremely energetic and releases more energy per gram than all other known explosives used in demolition.

9-11 GUFF FROM GORDON DUFF

The Duff article, which was edited by Jim W. Dean, is so full of errors that it cannot be taken seriously, except perhaps as evidence of his role as an agent of disinformation about 9-11. With this in mind, I wrote to Mr. Duff on May 23 to ask him why he had published this piece:

Dear Mr. Duff,

I am writing to ask you about your recent article, "Too Classified to Publish: Bush Nuclear Piracy Exposed".

Why did you publish this piece, which is clearly disinformation about 9-11, at this particular time? Who are you doing this for? I would think that this piece, which contains so many flagrant errors, clearly exposes you as an agent of 9-11 disinformation.

Can you explain why you published this article?

Christopher Bollyn

Gordon Duff responded the same day:



chris



of those involved in 9/11, you are one of the few who actually does work. of those involved in 9/11, i am the only one with a background in intelligence and who works actively in that area.



the piece, as published, is what was submitted. it, of course, debunks nanothermite, something the scientific community did years ago.



you see, i met the group working on nano-thermite, people well known to stephen jones, when they came to me for investment. their security officer, claudio d la'o, brought them to me.



no nanothermite was ever produced, a propellant with no production facility nor any purpose other than to replace the gun on the apache, something not done.



did you ever find the factory that you believe made it? I can give you several reasons you didn't.



I believe that "nanothermite" is the creation of disinformation agents. others who believe have become proprietary and defensive.



this is the first material that has come from a national intelligence agency. it is a huge breakthru for us.



as you had found '9/11 truth' totally stalled, over a decade now, hobbiests, freaks, shills, many of those, time wasters, i have long disassociated myself.



i am surprised at your accusation. VT has done more real damage that all others combined, by such a margin it is not worth discussing. we are 'the last man standing.'



you know, publishing books can be a problem. you take hits. i accept them. you don't.



I also simply run with the best information I can get and have the facilities to investigate things. after all, i do run a company with both a counter-intelligence division and one that does international criminal investigations.



my chief of staff was attache to israel and had investigated dimona. he is far from my only personal source.



admit this, you would never have access to something like that. I admit that I am prevented from printing what I could.



accept that the sale of nuclear material by the bush family is real. accept other things you choose to.



doubt everything.



please note that i am not an internet person. i just returned from Africa, i have defense contracts there and the middle east. i have a scientific staff with full nuclear clearances (i dont have). my group has done security assessments at all our nuclear facilities.



i don't look down on you but i do look down on most others and deeply resent them.



i have never spoken a word against you. i respect what you have done.



however, you have to admit that i have taken on more "risk" and been more confrontive than all combined. I do this, to an extent, because I am not entirely without some protecting and backing.



If you really think I can be "gotten to," you have not been paying attention. you are attacking my analysis through a bizarre personal accusation not only without foundation but almost irrational.



do this: prove me wrong. show me a nanothermite factory. get me people who have handled tons of it. show me how it was applied and used.



duplicate your hypothesis experimentally.



The russians have done that.



g [Gordon Duff]

CHECKING THE FACTS

The obvious purpose of the Gordon Duff article is to try to deny the presence and role of thermite (super-thermite in particular) in the destruction of the towers. The Duff piece contains so many errors that I am only going to point out those that pertain directly to the evidence of what happened on 9-11.

The Duff piece claims that nuclear devices were used on 9-11 and that these melted the "I beams of the central core" of the Twin Towers.

Fact: The core columns of the Twin Towers were box columns. I don't know what "I beams" he is talking about. The walls of the central box columns were 4 inches thick at the base and tapered to about 1/4 inch at the top of the towers.



The core box columns that held up the Twin Towers can be seen in this photo. The box column in the center appears to have been cut with a steel-melting charge of thermite.

The Duff piece says: "Melted steel and iron oxide or 'nano-thermite' is a byproduct of the very high gamma ray/Neutron flux induced into the central steel core. The radiation dissolves the steel into oxide consuming the carbon and silicone [sic] in the steel."

Fact: Iron oxide, or rust, is a component of thermite, not a product of a thermite reaction. What was found in the dust was large amounts of molten iron droplets or spheres. The molten iron that was found in the dust and at the base of the destroyed towers is evidence of a thermitic reaction, not a nuclear bomb.





One of the iron-rich spheres found in the dust. These tiny balls of molten iron are a common element of the dust from the World Trade Center demolition.

Fact: The active thermitic material that was found in the dust by Dr. Steven E. Jones, et al, was a nano-composite bi-layered material that had been manufactured using nano-technology. This explosive nano-composite is most certainly not the by-product of a nuclear explosion.

The Duff piece claims that "the upward blast of radiation literally vaporized" the 20-ton antenna tower atop the South Tower:

This explains the missing steel columns and the very important clue of the "vaporized" 20-ton antenna tower atop the south tower [sic]. The upward blast of radiation literally vaporized it. Video evidence proves this to be true. (Editor's note: Tower issue a vital one.)

Fact: This is completely false. Firstly, the antenna was atop the North Tower, and, secondly, it did not vaporize at all. It was the first thing to be seen falling as the demolition of the tower began. The base of the antenna is actually on display in the Newseum in Washington, D.C.



Part of the antenna mast that Gordon Duff says was "vaporized".



The Newseum in Washington D.C. has an 18-foot section of the recovered main antenna from the North Tower on display.





The 360- foot main antenna mast on top of the North Tower in 1998.





Part of the antenna sticking out of the rubble pile of the North Tower.

The Duff piece concludes: "The primary purpose of the nuclear weapon used on 9-11 was to produce a massive Gama [sic] ray/neutron flux that would vaporize about 150 to 300 feet of 6-inch thick steel I beams that constituted the central core of the WTC buildings. This created the free fall event as seen on TV that day."

Fact: The Twin Towers were pulverized from the top down. The core columns were severed, which is what caused the antenna mast to fall, but they were not vaporized in a nuclear blast.

The final paragraph of the Duff piece says: "The iron oxide found all over the place was what was left of the steel I beams. This was the so-called Nano Thermite that was found everywhere."

Fact: This is pure nonsense. Iron oxide was not found all over the place; iron-rich spheres were found in great numbers in the dust - tiny balls of iron that had been in the molten state when the towers were demolished.



This is not the "so-called Nano Thermite" that was found in the dust. These iron-rich spheres are products of the thermitic reaction. Duff is clearly misrepresenting the active thermitic material that was found in the dust. This indicates that neither Duff nor Dean understand what was found in the dust - or they are working to misinform the reader. I can only conclude that the latter is the case and that these men are agents of disinformation about what really happened on 9-11.

Sources and Recommended Reading:

“9/11: Honoring Broadcast Engineers of WTC #Sept11,” NYConvergence.com, September 10, 2011

http://nyconvergence.com/2011/09/911-honoring-broadcast-engineers-of-wtc-sept11.html

"Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe" by Dr. Steven E. Jones, et al, The Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009

www.benthamscience.com/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.pdf

"Gordon Duff is a Jewish Disinformation Agent", YouTube.com, November 11, 2012 (especially from 5:15 to 5:38)

youtu.be/YZufw3G931Q

"Too Classified to Publish: Bush Nuclear Piracy Exposed - Russia Opens Files on Nuclear 9/11 and Israeli Proliferation" by Gordon Duff, VeteransToday.com, May 20, 2014

www.veteranstoday.com/2014/05/20/too-classified-to-publish-bush-nuclear-piracy-exposed/

"Understanding the Use of Thermite on 9-11" by Christopher Bollyn, July 14, 2009

www.bollyn.com/understanding-the-use-of-thermite-on-9-11/

Chomsky as Intellectual Gatekeeper on 9-11

June 1, 2014

Alfred Schaefer has produced a brilliant video entitled "9-11 Gatekeepers and Controlled Opposition." The video is based on Schaefer's correspondence with Noam Chomsky, a highly esteemed professor with a large following who supports the official lies about 9-11. Schaefer was a long-time fan of Professor Chomsky and was shocked and dismayed to realize that the Jewish linguistics professor from M.I.T. is actually acting as a Zionist agent to suppress awareness of 9-11 truth. The last twenty-minute section of this video is a question and answer interview with Schaefer and me. This video is highly recommended.



Video Link - youtu.be/a-bHcfxO5y8

The Less Than Amazing Randi - Critic of 9-11 Truth is Funded by Military Contractors

February 4, 2014

The James Randi Educational Foundation (JREF) is funded by a high-level agent of the U.S. military industrial complex. The Randi "educational" foundation's financial connection to major U.S. military contractors explains why the JREF is so hostile to 9-11 truth. The JREF is actually headquartered in the same building as General Dynamics - at 2941 Fairview Park Drive, Suite 105, Falls Church, Virginia.



A LIAR AND A CHEAT - Who is this depraved man and why is he supporting the official lies about what happened on 9-11?

WHO IS RANDI JAMES AND WHY IS HE OPPOSED TO 9-11 TRUTH?

"The Amazing Randi", (a.k.a. James Randi, born Randall James Hamilton Zwinge, August 7, 1928) is a Canadian-American stage magician and scientific skeptic, according to Wikipedia, "best known for his challenges to paranormal claims and pseudoscience."

Randi is also the founder of the James Randi Educational Foundation (JREF), which is supposedly engaged in investigating paranormal, occult, and supernatural claims. Often called a "debunker", Randi prefers to describe himself as an "investigator."



THE BANNER OF DEPRAVED LIARS - The JREF forum spends a great deal of time attacking me with slanderous comments meant to discredit me and my 9-11 research. The comments are all written in proper English with correct punctuation, a good indication that the writers are professional disinfo agents.

One thing the JREF seems to specialize in is attacking the 9-11 truth movement and honest investigators like myself. I recently came across a discussion forum from the JREF website where the anonymous posters who are members of the JREF forum discuss me in a way that is clearly designed to smear my name and discredit my research. The heading for this discussion is "Why isn't Chris Bollyn a huge story in the conspiracy world?"

The final comment by "Triterope", the poster who began the discussion, begins with these unkind words, which reveal how he really feels about me and my 9-11 research:

I know I shouldn't care about Chris Bollyn's drivel, but stuff like this makes me want to puke every time I read it:

Originally Posted by Christopher Bollyn

In a letter to Paul P. Moreschi, my second legal counsel, Dr. Shelton wrote: "Now I understand why Helje (Mrs. Bollyn) stated to me she is more afraid of living in this country now than she was under Soviet occupation of Estonia. Seeing your husband viciously attacked by undercover police without warning on your own property, then hearing them make false statements on the stand, seeing them falsify their records, hearing the prosecutor fabricating defamatory baseless statements, and then the judge and jury believing this story, would do this to you."

You know what, Chris? If America is worse than life in a Soviet satellite republic, LEAVE. Get the hell out of this country...

What I have found in more than 12 years of 9-11 research is that most people are supportive of truth-seekers like myself who have spent years of their lives investigating what really happened on 9-11. The only people who spend their time attacking and slandering me like "Triterope" are paid disinfo agents. To support the official lies about the mass murder and terrorism of 9-11 is utterly depraved and evil. People like "Triterope" and James Randi have sold their souls to the master of deception.

In the following video, "Interview with James Randi on 9-11," Randi criticizes 9-11 truth seekers and claims to be an expert in deception. "As a magician, I know about deception. I know two things with great certainty: how people are fooled, and more importantly, how they fool themselves. And that is my expertise." His scathing criticism of 9-11 truth seekers, which he describes as crazy, stupid, and silly, and his support for the unproven official version of what caused the Twin Towers to fall strongly suggest that he is being paid to promote the government lies about 9-11.



Video Link - youtu.be/mXZjjBeC8bw

To understand the relationship between James Randi and military contractors like General Dynamics, we need to look at how his foundation was created and where it is based. The following is from the Wikipedia article on the JREF:

The JREF officially came into existence on February 29, 1996, when it was registered as a nonprofit corporation in the State of Delaware in the United States. On April 3, 1996 Randi formally announced the creation of the JREF through his email hotline:



“THE FOUNDATION IS IN BUSINESS! It is my great pleasure to announce the creation of the James Randi Educational Foundation. This is a non-profit, tax-exempt, educational foundation under Section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code, incorporated in the State of Delaware. The Foundation is generously funded by a sponsor in Washington D.C. who wishes, at this point in time, to remain anonymous. ”

— The Foundation, Randi Hotline, Wed, April 3, 1996

We now know that the millionaire sponsor of the JREF is Richard L. Adams Jr., the former computer programmer for SAIC and DARPA's Center for Seismic Studies. Adams started as a programmer for San Diego-based Science Application International Corp. (SAIC) and went on to a position as a data-gathering specialist with the Center for Seismic Studies, an outfit hired by the U.S. Department of Defense to develop technology for nuclear testing violation detection.



Adams is famous for his role in developing UUNet, a backbone of the Internet, which was bought in 1996 by MFS Communications, formerly Kiewit Communications, which was then bought by MCI, which then went out of business in a huge bankruptcy case. MFS Communications began in 1988 as a wholly owned subsidiary of Kiewit Diversified Group Inc., which in turn was a wholly owned subsidiary of Peter Kiewit Sons' Inc., one of the largest construction and mining companies in the United States. The Kiewit family of Omaha does a great deal of business with the U.S. military.

Adams took UUNet public in 1995, and a year later agreed to a $2 billion buyout offer from MFS Communications, which was acquired by WorldCom shortly thereafter. An instant millionaire from the sale of UUNet, in 1996, Rick Adams donated one million dollars to the James Randi Educational Foundation and he has served as the treasurer of the tax-exempt "educational" foundation ever since.



Richard L. Adams Jr. is the millionaire sponsor of the JREF. He is also the landlord of General Dynamics corporate headquarters, which is his main tenant and occupies half of his building.



The JREF is located in Suite 105 of the 2941 Fairview Park Drive building, which is the business office of Rick Adams' 2941 Fairview Park Drive, LLC, who is the legal owner of the building. Adams' biggest tenant is General Dynamics, whose corporate headquarters leases half the building and has their main office just down the hall from Adams' office - in Suite 100.



The JREF tax filing for 2012 shows Rick Adams as unpaid treasurer of the foundation. Why would a millionaire businessman give his time and name to a bogus educational foundation run by a former stage magician who is strongly opposed to 9-11 truth?

The James Randi Educational Foundation, Inc. is registered at 2941Fairview Park Drive, in Suite 105. This is also the registered address of the owner of the building, 2941 Fairview Park Drive, LLC, as well as several other companies associated with Rick Adams: 2900 Fairview Park Drive, LLC; 2941 Fairview, LLC; 2941, LLC; Fairview Property Development, LLC; Jose Alvarez Art Studio, LLC; and Northeast Quadrant Owners Association.

As the Washington real estate news website Bisnow.com reported in 2008, "We had lunch last week with David Orr at that great 2941 restaurant in Fairview Park, and he seemed to know everyone who passed. Maybe that's because he built the building five years ago and even negotiated General Dynamics' 15-year lease for half the 390k SF space... Dave built the 2941 building for UUNet founder Rick Adams in 2001: a $36M building on spec, part of 1.5M buildable SF Adams bought in Fairview Park."





Rick Adams' 2941 Fairview Park Drive building is corporate headquarters for General Dynamics, a leading defense contractor controlled by the Crown family of Chicago. General Dynamics and the Crown family have a vested interest in supporting the lies about 9-11: they profit greatly from the U.S. war effort in Afghanistan and the fraudulent "War on Terror." To understand the Crown family's relationship to the 9-11 cover-up, I recommend reading my article,"JFK and 9-11: Henry Crown and the Cover-Ups of Our Time".



I called Rick Adams to ask about his relationship with the JREF but he refused to discuss it and hung up the phone. I also called Daniel W. Denman, who works as a Director in the Division of Information Technology at the University of Maryland, but he also refused to discuss his role as a director and unpaid secretary of the JREF. These men have a good reason for not wanting to discuss their work with the James Randi Educational Foundation with me - they know that they are involved in a very evil project to deceive the public about what really happened on 9-11. To be involved in such an evil deception should make them wonder what they value in this life.



Daniel W. Denman at his day-job at the University of Maryland.

Sources and Recommended Reading:

"GMAC Commercial Mortgage Arranges $74 Million Loan on Trophy Office Tower in Falls Church, Va.", BusinessWire.com, September 13, 2004

www.businesswire.com/news/home/20040913005635/en/GMAC-Commercial-Mortgage-Arranges-74-Million-Loan#.Uu4r8PvAiZR

"James Randi," Wikipedia, February 4, 2014

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Randi

"James Randi Educational Foundation," Wikipedia, February 4, 2014

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Randi_Educational_Foundation

List of companies registered at 2941 Fairview Park Drive, Falls Church, VA

www.bizapedia.com/addresses/2941-FAIRVIEW-PARK-DR-FALLS-CHURCH-VA-22042.html

"MFS Communications Company, Inc. History," FundingUniverse.com, February 4, 2014

http://www.fundinguniverse.com/company-histories/mfs-communications-company-inc-history/

"Richard L Adams," Encyclopedia of Ecommerce, February 4, 2014

ecommerce.hostip.info/pages/2/Adams-Richard-L.html

"Rick Adams," Wikipedia, February 4, 2014

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rick_Adams_%28internet_pioneer%29

"The Biggest Developer You've Never Heard Of", Bisnow.com, January 28, 2008

www.bisnow.com/commercial-real-estate/washington-dc/the-biggest-developer-youve-never-heard-of/

"Why isn't Chris Bollyn a huge story in the conspiracy world?" forum discussion started by Triterope, James Randi Educational Foundation forum, under 9/11 Conspiracy Theories, June 26, 2007

67.228.115.45/showthread.php

Articles by Christopher Bollyn about the Crown family and General Dynamics:

“Chicago's Elders of Zion and Obama's War for Profit” by Christopher Bollyn, October 14, 2011

http://www.bollyn.com/chicagos-elders-of-zion-and-obamas-war-for-profit/

“James Crown: The Israeli Connection in the Madoff Scam” by Christopher Bollyn, October 26, 2013

http://www.bollyn.com/14419/

“JFK and 9-11: Henry Crown and the Cover-Ups of Our Time” by Christopher Bollyn, November 7, 2013

http://www.bollyn.com/jfk-and-9-11-henry-crown-and-the-cover-ups-of-our-time/

“The Crown Family Connections to the Kennedy Assassinations” by Christopher Bollyn, November 21, 2013

http://www.bollyn.com/the-crown-family-connections-to-the-kennedy-assassinations/

Peter Dale Scott on Chomsky and 9-11

January 25, 2014

I wrote to Peter Dale Scott, author of The War Conspiracy: JFK, 9/11, and the Deep Politics of War, asking about Noam Chomsky's "eyes wide shut" attitude about what really happened on 9-11.

Dr. Scott wrote back to me today and sent the link to this short video, where he addresses the reluctance of Noam Chomsky to address the real issues of 9-11:



Video Link - youtu.be/S_uad3-RsQk

Chomsky and the 9-11 Cover-up

December 30, 2013



Noam Chomsky, who has a large following, has stated that he does not think there has been a cover-up of what really happened on 9-11. The real question is WHY does Chomsky refuse to acknowledge the obvious evidence of a massive cover-up? Is it fear, tribal loyalty, or his long-standing connections to MIT and the Tavistock Institute of Britain?



THE ISRAELI CEO OF TAVISTOCK - The Tavistock Institute, funded by the royal family, the Rockefellers, and the Rothschilds, pioneered the techniques of propaganda used to justify war. The CEO of Tavistock is an Israeli woman named Eliat Aram.

Having seen Noam Chomsky commenting on 9-11, I knew that he denies that there has been a cover-up of the truth. When I saw his plug for Peter Dale Scott's book on 9-11 and the war conspiracy, I decided to ask him directly about the 9-11 cover-up. The following is my recent correspondence with Chomsky:



From: Christopher Bollyn

Sent: December 26, 2013



To: Noam Chomsky

Subject: Question about 9-11 Cover-up

Dear Professor Chomsky,

I have been reading Peter Dale Scott's book The War Conspiracy: JFK, 9/11, and the Deep Politics of War (2008). At the very top of the book's front cover (see attached photo) is the following plug attributed to you:



Peter Dale Scott's 2008 book about 9-11 and the war conspiracy with Chomsky's plug at the top of the front cover

"Scott exposes an element in the American system of global power that poses an increasing threat to the victims of this system, the American people among them."

- Noam Chomsky

In the book Professor Scott clearly states that he has "certain knowledge" that there has been a massive and on-going cover-up of what really happened on 9-11:

"I should make clear that, with respect to 9/11, I have certain knowledge of only one fact: that there has been and continues to be a massive cover-up."

- The War Conspiracy: JFK, 9/11, and the Deep Politics of War, p. 367

Since your name is at the top of the book I would assume that you support what Professor Scott says, that "with respect to 9/11," he has certain knowledge that "there has been and continues to be a massive cover-up."

Do you agree that there has been a massive and on-going cover-up of the truth of 9-11?

Thank you for your consideration of my question.

Here is Chomsky’s response to my question:

From: Noam Chomsky

Date: Dec 26 at 4:12 PM

To: Christopher Bollyn

This book appeared in 1972, and my comment refers to that edition. I haven’t seen anything more recent, including this edition. As for the practice of using a comment on the 1972 edition for this one, I leave it for you to judge.

I have no idea what Scott’s “certain knowledge” is, but it’s fair to assume that some things are being covered up, since that’s true about 100% of the time, not just in the US. The question is whether it’s anything significant.



Avram Noam Chomsky and his wife Carol in 1949



The Chomskys went to London from Montreal on a ship in early June 1953. They arrived in England on June 6, 1953...



...and returned to the USA in late September 1953. It was probably during these three-and-a-half months that they spent 6 weeks on a kibbutz in Israel. This is probably the time when Chomsky was recruited to work for the Tavistock Institute, Britain's Zionist propaganda agency.

Greg Palast’s Attack on 9-11 Truth

October 3, 2013

Originally posted August 11, 2007



Greg Palast on the Alex Jones Show. The critical viewer will ask, "How does Alex Jones fund the operation of his network?" It doesn't run on donations, that's for sure. One has to remember that the alternative media is just as tightly controlled as the mainstream media.



GREG PALAST ON INN WITH LENNY CHARLES - I can't look at all these, but controlled demolition I can rule out. I'm sorry, we just, it just... rules out… I haven't seen any engineer... it takes two years to wire a building for controlled demolition, and that's an awful lot of people. You'd have to snuff a lot of people... I mean, that's another theory, if you're gonna take out the buildings, you're not gonna do it with dynamite. It's just not gonna happen. And there's zero evidence, I mean there's absolutely stone cold nothing-nothing there. I'm sorry, Lenny, but that's what I gotta tell ya… No, no, no, no, no. There's no scientist. There’s no engineer! You can have ballroom dancers, you can have great actors, you can have poets, you can have physicists, there's a guy, Dr. Jones, his last big theory was that Jesus met with the Mayans after the resurrection. He's a complete fruitcake, and a complete, utter fraud. Mr. Jones, come at me.

- Greg Palast, INN interview, May, 2007

http://youtube.com/watch?v=r2oFTiEpIBQ

See 7-minute extract:

“Greg Palast On 9/11 Controlled Demolition,” YouTube, May 31, 2007

http://youtu.be/LPijAYCJ2YA

Who is Greg Palast and why is he attacking Professor Jones?

THE MOLTEN METAL OF 9-11

In August 2002, I discovered that molten metal had been found - in the molten state - in the basements of the three collapsed towers. I obtained this information from two of the men who supervised the removal of the rubble from the destroyed World Trade Center.

In the basements of the collapsed twin towers, where each of their 47 support core columns were connected to the bedrock, hot spots of "literally molten steel" were discovered more than a month after the collapse. "Such persistent and intense residual heat, 70 feet below the surface, could explain how these crucial structural supports failed," I wrote at the time.

See: "Seismic Evidence Points to Underground Explosions Causing WTC Collapse"

http://www.serendipity.li/wot/bollyn2.htm

PROFESSOR STEVEN JONES

While some readers suggested at the time that Thermite was probably the cause of the molten metal, it was not until the fall of 2005, when Professor Steven E. Jones of Brigham Young University began to study and discuss the evidence from the WTC that the important questions surrounding Thermite and the molten metal seen at the WTC reached a larger audience. Jones concluded that the evidence indicates that the molten iron seen before and after the collapses was probably produced by alumino-thermic reactions involving Thermite or Thermate.

See: "Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Completely Collapse?" http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200609/Why_Indeed_Did_the_WTC_Buildings_Completely_Collapse_Jones_Thermite_World_Trade_Center.pdf

See: "9/11 - Who Put Thermate in the World Trade Center?"

http://www.iamthewitness.com/Bollyn-Thermate-WTC.html

And: "Why Did Iron Boil in the Rubble of the World Trade Center?" http://www.iamthewitness.com/Bollyn-ProfCahill.html

I met with Professor Jones several times at the BYU campus during the spring of 2006 and visited Professor Thomas Cahill at the University of California at Davis between my visits to Provo. The data that these two professors have gathered corroborate the theory that large amounts of Thermite were used in the demolition of the three towers of the World Trade Center.

Shortly after I wrote a series of articles about the evidence of Thermite at the WTC during the summer of 2006, I was brutally attacked by three undercover cops who broke my right elbow and TASERed me in front of my wife and 8-year-old daughter. I was then maliciously prosecuted for aggravated assault and resisting a police officer. Despite an abundance of evidence that the Hoffman Estates police conspired to assault me before they arrived at my house and the fact that the police had destroyed their videos of the assault, I was found guilty of both charges. As I had been warned about the legal process in America, the side that gets the most evidence excluded wins. So it was.

Three weeks later, Professor Jones was the victim of a trap set for him on the NPR radio affiliate at the University of Utah:

On September 5, Doug Fabrizio, executive producer of RadioWest on the University of Utah's public radio station invited Jones to come on his one-hour program to discuss his 9/11 research.

After interviewing Jones for a brief 20 minutes, Fabrizio said goodbye to Jones and turned the remainder of the hour over to a discussion of conspiracy theories with two Jewish professors, a Robert Goldberg from the University of Utah and Gary Fine from Northwestern.

The first caller was a William Tumpowsky, chairman of the Jewish Community Relations Council and board member of the local Israeli-fund raising organization, the United Jewish Federation. Tumpowsky charged that Jones' was using code language to make anti-Semitic allegations. Goldberg supported this accusation.

Starting from this outrageous allegation, Fabrizio continued the hostile discussion with Goldberg and Fine, with frequent allegations that the now-absent physics professor was nothing more than an anti-Semite indulging in conspiracy fantasies. The most significant evidence brought forth by Jones' research was not even discussed.

Within two days, the authorities at BYU apparently caved to organized Jewish pressure and put Jones on paid leave.



See: "Are Zionists Behind Banning of Truthful 9/11 Scientist?" http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?noframes;read=93189

GREG PALAST

Despite the fact that Professor Jones' research is extremely solid and is highly regarded among scientists, an independent journalist named Greg Palast, who has no known scientific credentials, recently called him a "fruitcake" and a "fraud."

"Dr. Jones is a complete fruitcake and a complete and utter fraud," Palast said in a May 2007 interview with Lenny Charles of International News Net (INN). Then, turning to the camera, Palast said, "Mr. Jones, come at me."

Palast also said that his investigation had concluded that there was "zero evidence" that the towers had been demolished with explosives or Thermite.

See: "Greg Palast On 9/11 Controlled Demolition"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPijAYCJ2YA

WHO IS GREG PALAST?

A web-writer known as Smoking Mirrors (SM) posted an article entitled "Greg Palast Takes a Dive in The Midnight Hour" about Palast's attack on Jones. Palast, he wrote, "presents himself as an investigative reporter. He’s been a counter-culture hero of sorts who likes to picture himself as a Sam Spade in fedora sort of a guy who tenaciously digs to the real facts when the smoke machines and the light show hit the stage.

"It appears that Greg Palast is not who he presents himself to be," he concluded. "It appears, from my view, that he is a disinfo specialist."

The article concluded that Palast "has put himself solidly on the side of untruth with his name-calling dismissal of Dr. Steven Jones.

"For some reason, Greg Palast thinks that Dr. Steven Jones is a fruitcake for questioning the official 9/11 story and for subjecting the official explanation of how and why the 3 WTC Towers fell to the disciplines of the science in which he is widely considered to be an expert," SM wrote.

"A child in primary school knows that 3 +2 does not add up to four. Greg Palast indicates that he does not know this in respect of the bad math in the official 9/11 story, yet… we are led to believe that Greg Palast is a truth seeker and an intelligent man.

"What is the explanation for Greg’s position in defiance of hard, empirical science, mathematical law and common sense? It can’t be that he doesn’t know. That’s as absurd as his rejection of what is obvious to an ordinary layman. So why… why does he defend the official story?" SM asks.

"Can Greg Palast be as stupid as his position makes him out to be?" he asks. "Something is wrong with this picture. What might that be?"

A ZIONIST APOLOGIST

I met Mr. Palast at a vote fraud event in Columbus, Ohio, after the 2004 elections. I would agree with Smoking Mirrors description. Palast struck me as more of a performer than an investigative journalist. He never took off his hat indoors and impolitely took over our table where we were selling Eric Hufschmid's book, Painful Questions. Palast's biggest interest was clearly himself and selling his books.

His analysis and discussion of the voting problems in the 2004 election was off the mark, in my opinion. He focused on disenfranchised black voters in Florida while my main concern is the disenfranchisement of the entire electorate via electronic and computer vote fraud.

A year later, Palast came to my attention when he penned a badly-written article entitled "Was the Invasion of Iraq a Jewish Conspiracy" for the Jewish periodical Tikkun. Although Palast's logic and writing are weak, he comes on strongly as a Zionist apologist.

"There are kooks and cranks and conspiracy nuts out there who think George Bush, from the moment he took office, had some kind of secret plan to invade Iraq and grab control of its oil. They’re wrong," Palast wrote. Yet Palast ignores and belittles the Zionist-written Project for a New American Century (PNAC) document from September 2000, "Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources For a New Century," which specifically calls for the U.S. military to become engaged in Iraq.

"Did the Jews do it?," Palast continued. "I mean, after killing Jesus, did the Elders of Zion manipulate the government of the United States into invading Babylon as part of a scheme to abet the expansion of Greater Israel?"

Yes, they did.

This is at least how millions of people around the world would answer Palast's question. Yet Palast wrote that he did not even consider this possibility until someone asked him about it in 2004. Palast is admitting that the war of aggression against Iraq had already waged for a year before he even thought about who was behind it. He certainly is not the quickest of investigative journalists.

He never even addresses the PNAC document directly, but writes that he obtained a confidential 101-page document "in February 2001, just before the tanks rolled." What document and what rolling tanks Palast is referring to are as vague as his entire article.

I was most intrigued by his desperate attempt to divert attention from the Zionist role in planning and fomenting the war in Iraq. He was writing for the Jewish intellectual audience that reads Tikkun, after all, so I decided to look into who Mr. Palast is and where he comes from.

PALAST'S ZIONIST ROOTS

Greg Palast is the product of a Chicago-based Russian Yiddish immigrant family which married into an immigrant Hungarian Jewish family. Gregory is the 55-year-old son of Gilbert (Gil) L. Palast and Gladys E. (nee Kaufman) Palast from Chicago. He is married to Linda Levy and has two children. The family lives in lower Manhattan. His sister, Geri, was an Asst. Secretary of Labor during the Clinton administration. Greg grew up in southern California and earned his business degrees, including an MBA (1976), under Milton Friedman at the University of Chicago. His parents still live in San Diego. He contributes to the British press, the well-known left-leaning outlets who adamantly refuse to look at the evidence from 9-11.

According to a 1984 article in the San Diego Evening Tribune, his mother is a political activist who "learned about political organizing on the northwest side of Chicago." She may have been born in Hungary because the article says her "Jewish immigrant" parents "fled Hungary before World War II." The dates don't compute, however, unless "before" means 20 years before, because Gladys E. Kaufman married Gil, her "childhood sweetheart" from Chicago, in 1943. One will notice that the dates and facts in articles by and about the Palasts are somewhat elastic.

For example, Greg Palast says that he had an office in the North Tower of the World Trade Center. In an article he wrote on September 23, 2001, he says his office was on the 50th floor of the North Tower. More recently he said it was on the 52nd floor, yet in the 2001 article he says that his friend Greg O'Neill had an office on the 52nd floor and that his was on the 50th. Documents about the tenants of the North Tower indicate that the 50th floor of the WTC 1 was occupied by the Dai-Ichi Kangyo Trust Co. (DKB). Did Palast have an office with the Dai-Ichi Kangyo Bank?

Gladys E. Kaufman, his Hungarian Jewish mother, was the daughter of Alex Kaufman of West Armitage Avenue. Mr. Kaufman delivered milk using a horse and buggy, according to the 1984 article. In 1941, a milkman named Alex Kaufman of 3015 Hermitage Avenue was involved in a fatal accident in which a 15-year-old boy was run over by the rear wheels of his "milk truck". This may be the same Alex Kaufman.

Greg Palast's grandfather, on his father's side, was Norman Palast. There is very little written in the Chicago papers about Norman Palast. He was one of the sons of Esther Necha Palast along with Nathan, Max, and Joseph. He also had a sister named Clara (Mamet).

Nathan was apparently the oldest and was born in a Yiddish-speaking area of Russia about 1885. In 1910, the 25-year-old Nathan was a boarder with a Jewish family named Greenberg on W. 14th Place in Chicago. There is no mention of Esther's husband Leo. Nathan may have come to America first and sponsored the rest of the family to come from wherever they originated in Yiddish Russia. There is no other record of this Palast family in the Chicago census records from 1920 although my ability to research is limited.

Nathan Palast, Greg's great uncle, went on to become a "Jewish leader" and was president of the orthodox Agudath Achim synagogue on Chicago's South Shore from 1940 to 1949. This may be one of the reasons Greg Palast always wears a fedora. Nathan was made honorary life president of the synagogue.

Nathan was a leader in the Israel bond drive, active in the Combined Jewish appeal, the Jewish federation, B'nai B'rith, and the Hebrew Theological college, according to a Chicago Daily Tribune article from December 14, 1958. The elder Palast was honored at an Israel Bond Dinner at the synagogue he built at 7929 Yates Avenue. B'nai B'rith is the secret Jewish organization that founded the Zionist defense organization known as the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) in Chicago during World War I.

Chicago is a Zionist hotspot and Greg Palast is the son of one of Chicago's leading Zionist families. This is why he is so dedicated to diverting attention from the evidence of the Zionist involvement in 9-11. This is also why he desperately tries to excuse the Zionist role in the "War on Terror" and put the blame for the disastrous war in Iraq elsewhere. This is probably why he diverts attention from the real problems with elections in the United States. He is a Zionist gate-keeper of the left.



How Greg Palast sees the world: I don't see any evidence of Israeli or Zionist involvement in 9-11 or Iraq. I don't see any evidence of controlled demolition, Thermite, or explosives at the World Trade Center.

Originally posted by Christopher Bollyn on RumorMillNews.com as “The Zionist Gatekeeper Greg Palast & His Attack on Dr. Jones and 9-11 Truth,” August 11, 2007

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi/noframes/read/107738

Sources:



“Greg Palast On 9/11 Controlled Demolition,” YouTube, May 31, 2007

http://youtu.be/LPijAYCJ2YA

Greg Palast is Related to Mossad Chief David Kimche

October 7, 2013

Update: Israeli spymaster and Mossad chief David Kimche is a first cousin with Greg Palast's father. So, what does that make Greg Palast? An honest reporter? The fact that Greg Palast has hidden his family ties to Israeli intelligence suggests that he is working for them. Why else would he hide this relevant relationship. It certainly does not look good for Greg Palast. Don't Palast readers deserve to know about his ties to the Mossad?

Greg: You should write a tell-all book with a title like My Life as a Disinfo Agent for the Mossad. Hey, it would sell big -- but you might have to move to Israel.



GREG PALAST markets himself as an "investigative journalist" but he always misses the Israeli elephant in the room. Could it be because his father's cousin was David Kimche, a "founding father" of Israel's intelligence agency - the Mossad?



MOSSAD CHIEF DAVID KIMCHE WITH BIBI NETANYAHU - Greg's father Gilbert is a first cousin of David Kimche (right), a founding father of the Mossad who was deeply involved in Iran-Contra and other Israeli state crimes until he died in March 2010. As a former head of the Mossad, Kimche would have had a pretty good idea about the Israeli connections to 9-11, something Greg denies knowing anything about.



Palast is notorious for ignoring the most obvious evidence of Israeli involvement in 9-11 - or the war in Iraq. He even went so far to say that there is no evidence of controlled demolition or explosives at the World Trade Center. Could his relationship to Israeli intelligence be the real reason he fails to see the obvious in these huge crimes? Palast refused to answer my questions about his relationship to the former deputy director of the Mossad - but the public deserves an explanation of his family ties to Israeli intelligence.



WHAT CHUTZPAH - Palast rudely accused Dr. Steven E. Jones of being an "utter fraud" on INN with Lenny Charles, while he hides the fact that he is related to the "founding father" of the Mossad. Why would he hide that, if he is a honest "man of the people" reporter?

See 7-minute video:

“Greg Palast On 9/11 Controlled Demolition,” YouTube, May 31, 2007

http://youtu.be/LPijAYCJ2YA

Is Greg Palast a disinformation agent working for the Mossad? Why would a person tied to Israeli intelligence refuse to see the obvious evidence of explosive demolitions at the World Trade Center on 9-11? Why does Israeli intelligence attack honest 9-11 researchers like Dr. Jones and myself? What does this tell us about the Israeli role in 9-11?





GERI PALAST - Greg's older sister is another Zionist agent working for the state of Israel. Geri is the managing director of the Israel Action Network, "a strategic initiative of The Jewish Federations of North America." She is responsible for the operations of the IAN and works to promote the image of the state of Israel. Her Mossad connections are an important part of her work.



DAVID KIMCHE, the British-born Israeli spymaster and deputy director of the Mossad, is the son of Sara Palast, Greg Palast's great-aunt and his father's aunt. This means that David Kimche and Greg's father are first cousins. In 1987 theNew York Times described Kimche as "the former director general of the Israeli Foreign Ministry and now a private arms dealer" - when Kimche was served with a summons to testify before a federal grand jury about his role in the Iran-Contra affair. Kimche played a key role in the inception of the Reagan Administration's secret arms sales to Iran.



MOTHER OF THE MOSSAD - Sara Palast Kimche with her first five children (ca 1917). David, born in 1928, was her last child.

Greg Palast is an American journalist who rudely accused Professor Steven E. Jones, the scientist who discovered nano-thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center of being "a complete fruitcake, and a complete, utter fraud" on INN with Lenny Charles in 2007.

I wrote an article about Greg Palast in August 2007 in which I revealed his Zionist roots from Poland and Chicago. Having looked a bit more into the Palast family history, I found that Greg Palast is closely related to David Kimche, the late Israeli spymaster and deputy director of the Mossad -- Greg's father and David Kimche are first cousins.





David Kimche in 1983

When Kimche died in March 2010, his obituary in Ha'aretz read:

Kimche joined the Mossad spy agency in the early 1950s, and was in essence one of the organization's founding fathers, among those who designed its doctrine and modus operandi. He was involved in just about every aspect of the Mossad over the course of his service, eventually reaching the position of deputy head of Mossad.

The fact that Palast is related to one of the founding fathers of Israeli intelligence might explain his refusal to see the obvious Israeli connections to 9-11, electronic vote fraud, and other mega-crimes. This raises the obvious question: Is Greg Palast working for the Mossad?



To get Palast's side of the story I looked him up in the White Pages and called his number. A woman named Leni [von Eckardt] answered the phone. I told her I was working on an article about the relationship between Greg Palast and David Kimche, the famous chief of the Mossad. Leni was quick to confirm that they are related. She gave me Greg Palast's mobile number so I called him to ask about the details. He refused to answer any questions about his family relationship to David Kimche and pretended to be offended that I was asking such questions.



Palast's girlfriend Leni von Eckardt told me that he is related to David Kimche.

Source: Leni von Eckardt on Facebook



The relationship between Greg Palast and David Kimche is quite close and also explains Palast's close connection to Britain and the Zionist establishment of London. David Kimche was born in London on February 14, 1928. Kimche's mother was Polish-born Sara Palast, who married Moses Kimche from Grodno (then Poland). Sara was the daughter of Theodore Palast and Sonia Celmaister, and had many siblings: Nathan, Norman, Dora, Max, and Morris.

Sara's brother Morris (a.k.a. Moritz or Maurice, born in Poland, 1897) came to Chicago and listed Norman Palast of 1056 Oakley Blvd. as his nearest relative when he registered for World War I. Norman Palast is Greg Palast's paternal grandfather, i.e. the father of his father, Gilbert Leon Palast. The following documents indicate that Greg Palast's father, Gilbert, is a cousin of the former deputy director of the Mossad. The fact that Greg Palast is related to a former director of the Mossad is a troubling relationship that demands an explanation.



Greg Palast's father was born to Norman and Anna Palast in Chicago, in 1921.



Greg Palast's grandfather Norman (a.k.a. Nathan) Palast was born in Poland on January 26, 1888.



Greg's grandfather Nathan immigrated to the U.S. on October 31, 1913





and gave 151 Minories, London, as his address of origin



and his brother Max in Chicago as his destination in the U.S.



and his birthplace as Hrubieszow (Poland).



151 Minories was the London home of Sonia and Theodore Palast, where Sara Palast lived before she married Moses Kimche in 1908. This indicates that Sara Palast is a sister of Greg Palast's grandfather Nathan (Norman), which makes his father a cousin of David Kimche.



Norman Palast lived at 1056 N. Oakley in Chicago in 1917, when he registered for the war.



Maurice Palast listed Nate Palast of 1056 N. Oakley Blvd. as his nearest relative.



Another Nathan Palast also lived at 1056 N. Oakley, which may be a brother or cousin of Norman (Nathan) Palast.



When Maurice Palast became a citizen in 1927 he lived a few doors away from Greg's grandfather.



Morris (a.k.a. Moritz, Maurice) Palast



Maurice Palast married Gertrud Newman of Cleveland in 1926. He is buried in Cleveland.

Sources and Recommended Reading:

Ancestry.com for records on the Palast and Kimche families

"David Kimche, an Israeli Adept as Spy and Diplomat, Dies at 82" by Isabel Kershner, March 9, 2010

www.nytimes.com/2010/03/10/world/middleeast/10kimche.html

David Kimche, Wikipedia, October 3, 2013

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Kimche

Gilbert Palast obituary, East County Magazine, November 22, 2010

eastcountymagazine.org/node/4849

"Greg Palast’s Attack on 9-11 Truth" by Christopher Bollyn, Bollyn.com, October 3, 2013 (originally posted August 11, 2007)

www.bollyn.com/greg-palasts-attack-on-9-11-truth/

"Greg Palast, the left wing of the Lobby" by Israel Shamir

www.israelshamir.net/English/Palast.htm

"Israeli spymaster and Mossad founding father David Kimche dies at 82" by Yossi Melman, Ha'aretz, March 9, 2010

www.haaretz.com/news/israeli-spymaster-and-mossad-founding-father-david-kimche-dies-at-82-1.266398

What The Media Isn’t Telling You About The Syrian Chemical Attack

Updated September 5, 2013

Added material from interview with Bashar al Assad by Le Figaro:

Le Figaro: Mr. President, the Americans and the French have accused you of perpetrating a chemical attack on the 21st of August in Ghouta, which led to the death of hundreds. Do you have evidence to suggest that your army did not launch the attack?

Syrian President Bashar al-Assad: First of all, anyone making such an accusation is also responsible for providing the evidence to substantiate the allegation. We have challenged them to present a shred of legitimate evidence, which they have not been able to do. Since their foreign policy should be tailored to suit the interests of their own people, we have challenged them to present legitimate evidence to their own public opinion to substantiate their claims; again they have not done so.

Source: Interview with Syrian President Bashar al Assad, Le Figaro, September 3, 2013

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article36078.htm

The statements by the American administration, the West and other countries were made with disdain and blatant disrespect of their own public opinion; there isn’t a body in the world, let alone a superpower, that makes an accusation and then goes about collecting evidence to prove its point. The American administration made the accusation on Wednesday and two days later announced that they would start to collect the evidence - what evidence is it going to gather from afar?



...It is now crystal clear to everybody that what is happening in Syria is not a popular revolution pushing for political reform, but targeted terrorism aimed at destroying the Syrian state. What will they say to their people when pushing for military intervention: we are intervening in Syria to support terrorism against the state?

- Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to Izvestia, VoltaireNet.org, August 26, 2013

"If they don't have proof or evidence, then how are they going to stand up to the American public opinion and to the world public opinion and explain why they are attacking Syria?"

- Omran Zoabi, Syrian Information Minister to CNN, August 27, 2013



Interview with Omran Ahed Zoabi, Syrian Information Minister

France 24, 27 August 2013

URL Link - www.france24.com/en/20130826-interview-omran-zoabi-syrian-information-minister-poison-gas-attack-damascus-suburb-un-inspectors



Omran Ahed Zoabi, the Syrian information minister, was interviewed by France 24 about the alleged poison gas attack in a Damascus suburb. In the interview Zoabi reaffirms that the Syrian government is not responsible for the massacre. He discusses the UN inspectors' mission and deplores the way the Syrian crisis is being treated in the Western media. In the United States, for example, one rarely sees or hears anything from the Syrian government while the media parrots the statements and claims made by the so-called rebels, many of whom are not even Syrian.

In an interview with CNN, Zoabi challenged the United States to present its proof to the rest of the world that the Assad regime was responsible for having used chemical weapons. "If they don't have proof or evidence, then how are they going to stand up to the American public opinion and to the world public opinion and explain why they are attacking Syria?" Zoabi said.

In January 2013 there were reports in the media that the Obama administration supported the idea of using a false-flag attack with chemical weapons to be blamed on the Assad regime in Damascus.

U.S. BACKED FALSE-FLAG CHEMICAL ATTACK IN SYRIA - Daily Mail, January 29, 2013



The U.S. government supported using a false-flag chemical attack in Syria to be blamed on the Assad regime, according to this January 29 article. The article (now removed) begins: Leaked emails have allegedly proved that the White House gave the green light to a chemical weapons attack in Syria that could be blamed on Assad's regime and in turn, spur international military action in the devastated country.



"Leaked Documents: US Framed Syria in Chemical Weapons Attack" presents documents and evidence to support its case that the rebels, not the Assad regime, are responsible for the use of chemical weapons in Syria.

Video URL - youtu.be/gTUcvKO3js8





Ben Swann Video from June 2013 - youtu.be/ZLTkMYg4zbI

Extract from: "What The Media Isn’t Telling You About The Syrian Chemical Attack" by Ben Swann, August 26, 2013



Since the reported chemical attack last Wednesday, the Obama administration and members of Congress have been pushing the line that Syria’s President Bashar al Assad ordered the use of a chemical weapon on the outskits of Damascus.

According to CNN, one U.S. officials claims “There is nothing credible to indicate that the rebels, either the Syrian National Council or even al-Nusra Front, have used chemical weapons,” the official said. “Only the Assad regime is responsible for chemical weapons use.”

But that statement is false. When it comes to this latest incident, at this point we don’t know what kind of chemical might have been used. Nor do we know who used it. Some of the claims early on from “unnamed government sources” were that sarin gas was used in that Damascus suburb. The use of sarin gas would point toward the Assad regime, would it not?

Not necessarily. What our national media isn’t telling you is that in