My submission to the UK Parliamentary Committee is here – this version excludes figures. Here is a pdf version with illustrations.

In my situation – which is a little, shall we say, unique- it’s hard to figure out exactly where to start. So I tried to cover topics that I didn’t think anyone else would cover, other than the “trick” where I tried to counter Gavin-esque disinformation.

Update:

I sent the following corrigendum to the Committee responding to an alert comment by reader Tom P:

There was an inconsistency between the caption to Figure 5 and the covering text. The original caption to Figure 5 (which stated “right – varying the Tornetrask and Urals versions to newer versions”) was correct as submitted.

The running text should be changed as follows: For example, Figure 5 compares the published Briffa (2000) reconstruction (left) with a version derived merely by varying versions of Tornetrask and west Siberia tree ring chronologies (right) substituting the Polar Urals update for Yamal(right) . The medieval-modern differential changes with these seemingly inconsequential changes one seemingly inconsequential change of version .



