﻿I have watched much of her before, and from her appearance on Tucker Carlson to even small civil interviews as above, she has many of the same responses. Everyone is a “Fascist”, and all who deny it belong to the Patriarchy. I encourage you to research yourself about Yvette and her exploits.



And for those who haven’t the time or patience to listen to Yvette, here is an Appendix of timestamps and notes. I have tried to represent her arguments faithfully, albeit in a very one-sided and blanket form of judgment made by her:

“No regrets, Yvette Felarca.”



0:00 Yvette is asked for her motivation behind deplatforming Milo and more at Berkeley.

She makes claims of his Fascism and labels him as such.



0:50 Yvette explains her ideas and views, as well as this, is not a matter of violence and peaceful protest. This is a "Militant Protest". Scenes of the Berkeley riots are shown in clips between the protests, damages, and firebombings.



1:09 Yvette is asked as to why she is not choosing to be peaceful about her protests.

She justifies it as "The Left is too timid" as her reason behind how it is right to do.

As she begins listing off how it's their right to defend themselves due to Fascism.



2:07 The host asks Yvette if these actions are counterproductive. Yvette believes not, and claims all protests in regards to Fascists like Milo Yiannopoulos should be conducted by Militant Protesters as they were at UC Berkeley.



3:13 The host makes a point of how businesses in town got affected by the riots. Clips of BAMN hitting in windows and causing public damages are shown as the host lists off each concern of Yvette's Movement.



3:42 Yvette shifts the blame on a Chancellor, and suggests the business's blame the Chancellor too. Avoiding the facts that BAMN was the aggressor.

She furthers her point by saying due to the support for Milo and others, its the fault of the Chancellor that BAMN rioted. Claiming that the event where Milo was gonna speak was "An attack on Berkeley and the community" to reinforce her earlier point on her group was in self-defense.



4:27 Closing statements. Yvette claims in more ways than one, that it is best to further strengthen BAMN and to protest the same way again in the future.”



I hope this presents a fair characterization of her views. While Yvette is entitled to believe whatever she likes, it becomes clear to me that she intends to stir up violence, regardless of the justifications she gives. If you condemn such justifications and find them hollow, as I do, or if you agree, I hope you find this at least intelligible and accurate.