ohhellnothomas:

queerdiddlebot: erikawithac: downlo: Note: A brogressive can be a man or a woman. See also: manarchist Fuck. Yes. (especially the see also: manarchist). Seriously would you all SHUT THE FUCK UP with your terms. Just say what you mean instead of making up crazy new terms for things that you don’t truly understand. Also, I have to say, that I’ve done some thinking about it and I don’t think it’s ‘brogressive’ to support Assange. Evidence that points out he clearly didn’t do it aside, the man stands up for freedom of speech, in fact he is a paragon for it. Supporting him has nothing to do with sexism, it is to do with supporting freedom of speech (which is something that you feminists seem to know absolutely fuck all about). (via freshfeminism)

Hehe. My first trollish reblog and it’s a classic brogressive one at that. Let’s see:

He does important work - So anyone who does socially useful work should be exempt from being arrested and prosecuted for crimes they might commit?

Feminists are ignoring the real problem, which is freedom of speech - Strawman. It’s possible to believe that Wikileaks’ work is important and should be legally protected and also demand that Assange be brought to justice if he did rape those women. Unlike our boy Thomas here (or whatever the hell his name is), some of us have brains that are big enough to hold two thoughts at once.

Just two? Sad face. I don’t have a bingo yet. Though if he reads this, maybe he’ll be provoked enough to give me a few more squares.

(via ohhellnothomas-deactivated20101)