2% weight

This was a tough one to rate because there's a few conflicting elements; if it weren't for a potential (probable) instance of plagiarism in the white paper, I likely would have rated it higher.



First of all, the idea for a multiblockchain framework for business and enterprise customers makes sense and the game plan has potential. I also like that the team behind it has allegedly built and released some applicable software constructs in the blockchain space -- that modes well for the feasibility of the project actually reaching fruition.



The pricing of the token for the ICO and the hard/soft caps are all reasonable, which rates favorably for me, as well.



What is a huge strike against the project for me, though, is the fact that an entire section of the white paper seems to be plagiarized from other documents. To me, that's a sign of either laziness or (worse) malice, neither of which is a good thing for building trust within a project. It's things like this that foster doubt of whether or not the team behind it actually built the software they claim to have produced and whether or not they are actually capable of developing this framework.



I reached out to the team on the 24th seeking clarity on the white paper and reserve the right to update my review/score pending the response.



For reference, the white paper section of merit is titled 'A common platform for communication between the company and its shareholders' and these are two of the source papers where the information was copied from:



Corporate Governance Commentary: https://www.lw.com/thoughtLeadership/rules-of-engagement



Harvard Law School Forum:

https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/11/13/building-relationships-with-your-shareholders-through-effective-communication/

+1 Agree +1

+1