Rep. Eric Swalwell thinks that making threats is the lowest form of communication. Huh. Maybe Eric missed it but he himself was threatening to nuke gun owners just a few months ago.

Watch.

Making threats is the lowest form of communication. If your response to a lawmaker proposing to change gun laws is to threaten to kill that lawmaker, you are proving why we need better laws on firearm possession in America. pic.twitter.com/uhWfJmofEA — Eric Swalwell (@ericswalwell) April 23, 2019

And he posted this HIMSELF so you know he thinks it’s a good thing.

Whoa boy.

Our turn …

‘Making threats IS the lowest form of communications, Eric.

If your response to a citizen challenging your ideas around taking away their firearms is to threaten to nuke that citizen, you are proving why we need better people in office in America.’

See, we can play that game too.

By your flawed logic the American Revolution would have never commenced. The #2A is literally for overthrowing a corrupt government that is violating inherent rights. — Richard M. Castaldo (@Castaldo2018) April 23, 2019

i mean, you threatened to nuke people, so, you can just sit right down. — Tommy (@NYAVGtommy) April 23, 2019

There's only one valid law on firearm possession in America… The second amendment. That is the threat, otherwise why are you so against it?https://t.co/oYqg5wpbPN — angry libertarian NPC (@mattatat138) April 23, 2019

No one should threaten you, you are correct. However, you are dumb. — Ron “Baker” Mexico (@SimpleWater1) April 23, 2019

Heh.

Just nuke em — Matthew Cardiel (@MillenialMatt92) April 23, 2019

Good times.

Related:

Dropped on his HEAD?! Lindsey Graham takes Bernie Sanders to the SHED for supporting felons voting from prison

‘Keystone Cops-type response’: Sharyl Attkisson NAILS Obama admin with 10 factors making Russia his most enduring SCANDAL

‘They suppress the TRUTH!’ Svetlana Lokhova’s thread on how NBC ‘bullied her’ for contradicting their fake narrative is DAMNING