On February 8, 2016 at Evans Pool in Seattle, Washington, a man wearing board shorts entered the women's locker room and took all his clothes off. When females alerted staff they asked the man to leave.“The law has changed and I have a right to be here,” the man told them, citing the transgender rule.Fearing getting sued for "discrimination", the Trojan Horse hook the gaystapo lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, pedophile, necrophile, coprophile and zoophile community uses to attack your basic human and civil rights, the Parks and Recreation city staffers declined to call police.The gaystapo schemed rule applies to schools, businesses and parks. The state ruling enacted by the (Homosexual) Rights Commission of Washington was met with criticism by some in the state who thought the rule went too far.But efforts to repeal the rule halted in January when a judge ruled that the bill to reject transgender bathroom access www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/transgender-nohearing/ . As far as policy to protect everyone, Seattle Parks spokesman David Takami says they're still working on the issue. Right now, there's nospecific protocol for how someone should demonstrate their gender in order to access a bathroom. Employees just rely on verbal identification or physical appearance, and this man offered neither."This didn’t seem like a transgender issue to staff – someone who was “identifying” as a woman," Takami said in a statement. "We have guidelines that allow transgender individuals to use restrooms and locker rooms consistent with their gender identity. We want everyone to feel comfortable in our facilities.Except for the gaystapo doe s not want women and little girls to feel comfortable, they only want tranny sex pervert mentally ill freaks to feel enabled and comfortable as they attack the privacy rights of women and girls.Hours before the man used gaystapo laws toget naked in the locker on front of little girls, protesters on both sides of the bathroom safety bill www.king5.com/story/news/politics/state/2016/02/15/supporter Supporters of the law allowing women and girls privacy to be denied said that predators would still be prosecuted if they took advantage of the rule, while opponents cited sexual assault asa reason the ruling was dangerous for women in particular. That's the point, ignorant libtards, all one has to say is they "feel" like the opposite sex.“We’re not here saying that the transgendered community are predators,”a woman who was a victim of sexual assault told KING-5 TV, “We will never say that because we don’t believe that. What we do believe is that this code is so poorly written that predators will abuse. We know itbecause we have lived it.”And who lobbied for the law, imbecile? Homosexual Super Predators!