… notwithstanding the fact that you are wrong (while AI is a subset of computing, computing naturally encompasses more than AI and thus the two are not interchangeable), what exactly is your point? Does innovation in computing somehow “miraculously” distinguishes itself as being innovation outside the realm of patent protection on some per se basis? Are claims to such innovation somehow not capable of being written in at least one statutory category? Are such claims not providing utility within the Useful Arts?

Do you have anything other than your feelings (or the table) to pound?

Maybe facts (reality)…?

Maybe Law (as written by Congress)…?

Anything?

Bueller?

Bueller?