While this article may sound like an answer to the recent pieces seen on Ars, or PCWorld, regarding how poorly the Steam Machines have done in the past 6 months, this could not be further from the truth, since I had this article as draft since May and only decided to finalize it recently using the most recent data available following the disclosure of Valve and the 500 000 Steam Controllers sold. So, this one will try to answer the question “How are the Steam Machines doing, 7 months later?“.

There are several ways to look at it. Has there been any activity from the different manufacturers to release new machines? Any new entrants ? Can we estimate the sales so far ? How much cash did those manufacturers make so far ? Was it worth it for them ? We can try to answer all those questions, using some estimations.

First, in terms of activity, well, the data is kind of clear. 7 months later, there has been, to my knowledge, no major new entrants in the Steam Machines world. But there are small companies, like Materiel.net, which now offer their Steam Machine (basically typical Gaming PC in a small tower) for example at 799 EUR, even though Valve shows their machine as being not available, while it’s in stock on their side. What the Hell ?

Among the other small companies:

The Alternate Steam Machine, planned for November 2015, is still not available.

Same story for the Digital Storm Steam Machine, previously planned for November 2015. Missing the fight again, son.

The NextBox from our italian friends seems to suffer the same destiny. Not available.

Another one with the Webhallen Steam Machine… this is becoming boring.

Hey, but there’s one additional option, the MainGear Drift, that I was not aware of. Pricey from 1099 dollars, but well… and let’s not forget the Scan 3XS ST machines, with decent options for GPUs. I am not sure when those were made available, but apparently they were already sold back in November 2015.

The three “main ones” are still being sold and advertised on their manufacturer’s websites:

One of the problem I have is that… it seems like the launch page of the key Steam Machines (i.e. the Alienware one, that Valve even promoted in the first place) has never been updated since November 2015. Look at the info available right there:

Have a PC game that you want to play on your TV? Not a problem as you’ll be able to play over 1500 games locally or stream any of the 6000 Steam games on your home network directly to your TV.

1500 games? Guys, we passed 2000 games already…

MASSIVE GAMES LIBRARY – Choose from thousands of native SteamOS games and over 5,000 additional games available via streaming. Free copy of Rocket League and Portal 2 included in all pre-sale purchases.

Oh, maybe you should stop talking about Rocket League… as it’s a port in limbo for like 7 months already.

WILL THE ALIENWARE STEAM MACHINE HAVE OTHER ENTERTAINMENT/MEDIA FEATURES LIKE THE ABILITY TO PLAY MOVIES AND MUSIC?

Yes. You’ll be able to stream TV shows and movies or listen to music while gaming. Steam delivers more than just games to your living room.

Oh, please do tell me know when that feature is coming in SteamOS, because it seems to be missing.

HOW DO I REDEEM THE GAMES THAT COME BUNDLED WITH THE STEAM MACHINE?

There are 3 Full version games: PAYDAY 2 2015 Game of the Year Edition (Coming to SteamOS in early 2016), Screencheat and Robot Roller-Derby Disco Dodgeball. Additionally users will get these items available in Brawlhalla and Warthunder, both free to play games: branded skin and 200 Mammoth Coins (Brawlhalla) and an M18 Black Cat Tank and XP-38G Lighting plane (Warthunder). There is also an Alienware exclusive demo of the game Coffin Dodgers.

Guys, we are not in “early 2016” anymore, it’s time to update your page.

Syber is not without blame since they proudly say the following about their Steam Machine…

Don’t limit yourself to the overpriced and limited selection of console games. With the SYBER PC Console, you’ll get access to any of the over 10,000 Microsoft Windows compatible game title from all major publishers. Access major gaming libraries including Steam, UPlay, Battle.net, Origin and the Windows Games Library.

Again nothing new, that kind of problematic wording was already there at launch. Just, no change, no update.

This is, I think, telling that such companies are not seeing the sales they expected and do not care in investing anymore time in trying to market them further.

But what kind of sales are we talking about really ? As mentioned by Valve themselves, they sold about 500 000 Steam Controllers. Based on our own survey done within the GNU/Linux gaming community, we can roughly estimate that there’s a ratio of 1:25 between ownership of a Steam Machine and that of a Steam Controller. Of course, I have absolutely no idea if that ratio is valid across other, larger communities (it could be lower, or larger), but that’s a better estimation than none at all. How do we know, though, that this ratio is not completely utter bullshit ? Well, the Amazon reviews give us a hint: The Steam Controller gets about 1047 reviews at the time of writing, while the Alienware Steam Machines have about 38 reviews, which is a 1:27.5 ratio. Obviously we don’t know if the percentage of reviews is consistent across products, but in general it is more or less the case. So our ratio of 1:25 seems appropriate for this exercise.

For such a ratio that would mean that about 20 000 Steam Machines were sold. You can play around with the ratio… if the ratio is twice better, then you get 40 000 machines. Twice worse, and only 10 000 machines. Anyway, it seems to be in the tens of thousands, and this sounds like a reasonable guess.

As to who profited from these sales, I think I’m not mistaken by saying the large majority went to Alienware’s. There are several ways to tell that, we have our survey as one indicator (Alienware is the only one with high awareness – 95% have heard about it, while for Syber/Zotac the awareness drops to about 75%), we have the number of Amazon reviews as another. Again, just an estimation but I would say 6/10 bought an Alienware Steam Machine. So if we keep our prior estimation of 20 000 units, 12 000 units for Dell (Alienware’s mother company).

How much money do they make on such hardware? This is a much more difficult question to answer. One way to address that question is to look at the typical profit ratio of PC makers, and there are already pretty good estimations made out there before, since most PC makers are public companies and you can easily derive such metrics. It’s usually about 3%. But let’s assume they made some higher margins with this hardware, since they don’t make any money by installing crapware on such machines. Let’s feel generous and say they made 5% of profit. If we assume an average price of 500 USD for the different models of Alienware Steam Machines sold, that would be about 300 k USD. A third of a million dollars, give or take. Not bad, but still a drop in the ocean (even if we assume it was twice or three times more), if we consider Dell’s (of which Alienware is a part of) net income from 2013 hovering around 702 million dollars. Of course, Dell does a lot of other stuff, but Alienware was already a 160 million USD business (revenues) when it was bought by Dell in 2006, and it’s been rumored to have grown massively since then. Even for Alienware this may not be some significant sales (and on Amazon the Alienware Alpha has about 10 times more comments, suggesting much stronger sales than the Steam Machine version).

In any case, several dozens of thousands units is clearly not hitting any mark no matter how you look at it. If we consider the install base of 125 million gamers on Steam, this means less than 2 folks out of 10 000 bought a Steam Machine. That’s a very, very low percentage, among your existing client base. This also means that the Linux community (if we assume 1% of 125 million) is at about 1.25 million Linux gamers potentially – so any change coming from the Steam Machines’ shipped units is NOT going to register, even if they had any user survey appearing in their SteamOS interface.

There’s no point re-hashing the obvious (there was no marketing, no budget spent in advertising, no branding whatsoever, no framing to explain why such machines are great, no categorization of Steam Machines based on their specs, machines were overpriced, etc…), but while I am fairly confident SteamOS is a good idea (and we will see very soon when I disclose the latest survey results from early 2016, its share is constantly growing), the Steam Machines by themselves may not be ready for the market right now. I still think they will make a lot more sense down the road, when hardware becomes cheaper and much more powerful, but there’s still many features missing in SteamOS (we still don’t have any video service, and absolutely no VR support) and Vulkan is just starting to gain a little traction. Problem is, will manufacturers be willing to keep Steam Machines in their catalog 2, 3 years later, based on the pitiful sales of Year 1 ? They may need a lot of convincing to continue supporting that initiative down the road.

Still, while articles about the platform are overly negative, I agree at least with the feeling. Valve did not go a good job at launching these machines, there were a million ways they could have done things better, and let’s just hope they are in for the long term and will learn from their mistakes, instead of just pretending nothing happened.

BoilingSteam lets you access our content for free, but writing articles is a constant investment. We don't use ads or sponsporship, help us make our activities sustainable by donating via Patreon or LiberaPay if you prefer it anonymous. Note that Patreon supporters get the weekly or twice-a-week Proton Deals Newsletter to help them save time and money when buying games for Linux. You can follow what we do via our newsletter, our RSS feed, our Mastodon profile or our Twitter feed. We also have Peertube and Youtube channels. If you'd like to chat, you can also find us on #boilingsteam:matrix.org.