Anonymous Hello, I’m the mammoth-evo-psycho from last week. First, I find this blog fascinating so not planning to leave any time soon. Second, the existing homo-sapiens gene pool shows that humanity descends from a small number of males and a much, much larger number of females. That indicates that few men had sexual access to several women during prehistory. Few men / lots of women means that only strongest and most capable males got reproducing. Rest had to be content with pornographic figurines. Mvh

Oh, so you saw the reblog I made just for you?

You know, one of the things you’re stating here is true - that we came from few men and many women. Doesn’t that mean that a 20-80 ratio men/women is more natural, and that the 49/51 or whatever it is we have now is only a product of the patriarchy rather than a natural ratio of males to females? That’s what I think.

I don’t think we NEED porn though, and the statuette being interpreted as pornography is the work of the pornsick modern man, not the prehistoric one.

Also, have you read Sex at Dawn? I just wonder what evo psychs think of it in general.

- Pi