While it might be the case that social media is not always buzzing with the atrocities of South Sudan, it's not true that there's silence from the news media.

Washington Post correspondent Kevin Sieff spent over a week in a refugee camp in South Sudan in July, reporting on the vulnerabilities of civilians fleeing the conflict. That's where he met Rachael Mayik, 56, who had spent two years living in a U.N. camp with insufficient food and overflowing toilets, guarded by peacekeepers who ran away when fighting erupted. Now she was anguished as new battles in Juba appeared poised again to set off violence throughout the country.

AD

AD

Or this one from Post freelancer Jason Patinkin about a new report that shows the United Nations provided arms to South Sudan rebels at the start of the conflict. He has also contributed powerful pieces to the Associated Press, reporting how South Sudanese troops went on a rampage in a compound in the capital in July, shooting a local journalist and raping foreigners.

Other journalists have done in-depth work to expose the horrors of the war. Here are just a few:

AD

— The New York Times, about how fighting in the capital of Juba is pushing South Sudan to the brink of war.

AD

— The Wall Street Journal, also reporting from Juba, about how gang rape and looting are forcing South Sudan to the edge of becoming a failed state.

The Obama administration played a key role in South Sudan’s birth as a country in 2011, when it seceded from Sudan. War broke out two years later as President Salva Kiir, of the Dinka ethnic group, split with then-Vice-President Riek Machar, of the Nuer ethnic group. Since then, tens of thousands of South Sudanese have been killed, and over 2.7 million have been forced from their homes.

Obama may say he feels responsible for the slaughter. But journalists have been reporting it for years.