Egg McMuffin: We Need a Conservative Movement That Isn't As Deplorably Racist as the One that Currently Exists Is It used to be that conservatives would say, correctly, that while there were of course racists (and criminals, and perverts, and any other sort of degenerate you can name) in the GOP, that is true of both political parties, and they tend to constitute a fringe in either. And certainly it's no reason to reject a political policy proposal simply because some bad elements support it as well. And certainly it's no reason to reject a political policy proposalsome bad elements support it as well. White nationalists have resented "Blacks on Welfare" for ages. But so too have non-white nationalists opposed the growing welfare state, not just for blacks or any other nonwhite race, but for anyone, stating, correctly, that it's unfair to take from one to give to another, and furthermore, work is a virtue and a teacher of virtue, and depriving a man or woman of the virtue-making habit of work is to consign him or her to a life of idleness and moral chaos. White nationalists have resented "Blacks on Welfare" for ages. But so too have non-white nationalists opposed the growing welfare state, not just for blacks or any other nonwhite race, but for anyone, stating, correctly, that it's unfair to take from one to give to another, and furthermore, work is a virtue and a teacher of virtue, and depriving a man or woman of the virtue-making habit of work is to consign him or her to a life of idleness and moral chaos. We used to call people who said that "Republicans." We used to call people who said that "Republicans." However, there's a new breed of "Republicans" out there who are really simply members of the Party of Davos, and buy into most liberal assumptions, like the idea that being against welfare is to "hate" poor people and/or people of a different race, or that to object to the current policy of American Citizenship for Anyone Willing to Break American law is also "racist," though which race in particular is the object of hate here is somewhat unclear, because the racial group currently immigrating (legally or illegally) to the US is Asians, not Latin Americans. However, there's a new breed of "Republicans" out there who are really simply members of the Party of Davos, and buy into most liberal assumptions, like the idea that being against welfare is to "hate" poor people and/or people of a different race, or that to object to the current policy of American Citizenship for Anyone Willing to Break American law is also "racist," though which race in particular is the object of hate here is somewhat unclear, because the racial group currently immigrating (legally or illegally) to the US is Asians, not Latin Americans. This new breed of "Republicans," the Davoisie is not only willing to join the liberals in claiming that any sort of assertion that Americans should get to decide which non-Americans are permitted to become AMericans is itself deplorably racist and must be rejected in favor of open borders globalism, but anxious to vent these hateful thoughts about other Republicans that they've been suppressing for so many years now. This new breed of "Republicans," theis not only willing to join the liberals in claiming that any sort of assertion thatis itself deplorably racist and must be rejected in favor of open borders globalism, butto vent these hateful thoughts about other Republicans that they've been suppressing for so many years now. Egg McMuffin is one of them. We need a new conservative movement that doesn't care about color of your skin, that embraces you for who you are. https://t.co/Ilqd0IP6Lh — Evan McMullin (@Evan_McMullin) November 6, 2016

Many people would say that's the old conservative movement, the one that isn't a race-obsessed as the liberal movement -- but the Davoisie wouldn't say that. Anyone who disagrees with the imperatives of open borders, globalism, universalism and patriotic attachment to one's homeland must be cast into the outer darkness of social scorn. Many people would say that's theconservative movement, the one that isn't a race-obsessed as the liberal movement -- but thewouldn't say that. Anyone who disagrees with the imperatives of open borders, globalism, universalism and patriotic attachment to one's homeland must be cast into the outer darkness of social scorn. Please, definitely, vote for him. Or else he'll call you a racist. Please, definitely, vote for him. Or else he'll call you a racist. We haven't heard that enough from non-conservatives already, I guess. We haven't heard that enough from non-conservatives already, I guess. Posted by: Ace at 03:39 PM











MuNuvians MeeNuvians Polls! Polls! Polls! Frequently Asked Questions The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick Top Top Tens Greatest Hitjobs News/Chat