3) I wasn’t able to find a distribution that works like a system to me.

It’s really hard for me to explain this. But what I mean is that every single distribution just feels like a bunch of packages glued to the kernel.

Changing between a distribution or another is not an alternative to me now, because I realized that the main difference between one or another is the package manager.

Do you like how Kubuntu looks like? Well, you can make Arch Linux look like that and the biggest difference you will get at the end will be the package manager.

I just started thinking that there aren’t so many distributions with big differences. Of course they exist, like Crux, Alpine and Void.

And I’m still annoyed because Void Linux seems to be the only one that jumped to LibreSSL.

UPDATE: @quobit and the user “catwell” on lobste.rs told me that Alpine Linux also migrated to LibreSSL. And now that I remember, Lunar Linux have the recipe on its repositories too, but it still being optional from OpenSSL.

I can’t believe how fast it was decided to start using systemd without thinking on start using LibreSSL too, that’s a really bad movement in my opinion. One has a security advantage, the other one writes binary logs.

So, the point of this section is that there aren’t so many distributions that take their own way from the rest to build a different system. That’s where BSD has a point, they make full systems with their own tools, instead of doing “flavours”.