Plain Language Summary

What you will learn

How to identify, prevent, and recover from overtraining/underperformance syndrome

How overtraining affects your body

What separates overtraining from overreaching

Why "overtraining" is not a good term to use

If you prefer to watch a video instead of reading, scroll down to the Video Summary by PictureFit.

Terms

Term Explanation Being Overtrained / Underperformance Syndrome The body’s response to excessive, long-term training stress, poor recovery, and other stressors. Consequences: physical underperformance, low energy, irritability, hormonal changes, neural changes, and increased risk of illness and injury. Overreaching Training very hard so that you temporarily exceed your ability to recover. 1-4 weeks of rest should clear up any overreaching. Non-functional overreaching When you keep going after overreaching. This state is similar to overtraining/underperformance, but you recover quicker.

Consequences of overtraining (infographic)

How to prevent overtraining (infographic)

How to recover from overtraining

Do

Rest and take time off from exercise

Very light exercise

Mind-body therapies like meditation, stress-management, or yoga

Eat at maintenance or a surplus (get enough calories, macros, and micros)

Try to take care of life stress

Don’t

Keep exercising

Drink excessively

Video Summary

PictureFit created a solid overtraining video based on this article!

Using science to solve overtraining

This guide is based on a large body of scientific litearture. We have analysed and reviewed many studies to give you an evidence-based way to prevent and treat overtraining. Most of the studies we’ve looked at are relatively recent (published the last 5-7 years). In this way, you get a simplified summary of the cutting edge research. For example, recent advancements suggest that meditation is actually a good way to improve performance and prevent overtraining. We can contrast this with mental stress which negatively affect performance, and possibly even hypertrophy.

In short, this guide will help you learn what overtraining is, how to identify symptoms, and how to prevent and treat it. Adhering to the concepts in this guide can reduce your risk of injury, sickness, mental and physical burnout, which directly and indirectly affect your progress, motivation, and performance in the gym, the track, in the pool, on the bike or whichever type of training you do.

How to read this guide

You can read this guide whichever way you want; you don’t have to read it linearly from start to finish! You can jump to whichever section is most relevant to your life situation. However, you should read the first two sections: Introduction and Overtraining: an outdated term to get some basic background information and context. Without this context you might have trouble understanding the terminology used in the article. You’d probably want to go to the top of this page if you want to get an effective overview of the subject without much time-investment. Please find the Terminology list at the end of the article.

Introduction

Historical context

Every athlete and coach has heard of overtraining (OT). In a nutshell, scientists now think overtraining is caused by many things. Whether that’s excessive exercise, stress or other factors. In the popular media, some people believe OT may not exist at all while others believe it does. One of the reasons OT is so heavily debated has to do with the contradictory research literature; a ton of studies on OT exist, but they do not all agree on the causes, or how to prevent and treat it.

Ask yourself: do you think overtraining exists? How would you become overtrained? Does it happen slowly or quickly? Which factors contribute to overtraining? Are there any ways of preventing or treating it? Which athletes are at risk for OT?

Historically, OT has not lacked for names which include: burnout, staleness, overtraining, failure adaptation, overstress, overuse, chronic fatigue, training stress syndrome, unexplained underperformance syndrome, muscle failure syndrome, and excessive exercise. This has lead to a lot of confusion and misdiagnoses, and several scientists now think there’s more to overtraining than an athlete’s workload.

Prevalence and duration

Many studies have looked at the prevalence of OT. According to some studies, OT could affect anywhere between 7% to 20% athletes per season [1-3, 121], or 7% to 31% per year, in collegiate athletes [5-6, 42]. The number is probably higher in elite athletes [2, 7]. For example, a study of elite British athletes report that 15-35% males and 4-15% females became overtrained during a season [8]. Six out of 15 interviewed US Olympic athletes reported symptoms of overtraining 90 days before the 1996 and 1998 Summer Olympics [9].

In summary, if we include athletes of all levels, the prevalence of OT is anywhere from 4% to 35% per season. 30% to 65% of athletes will become overtrained at least once in their career [1, 8]. Athletes that were diagnosed with overtraining once, were almost guaranteed (91%) to become diagnosed again [1]. But, the stats depend on factors such as the gender, workload, competitive level, and sport of the athlete [8]. Once diagnosed, OT can last anywhere from a couple of months to several years [10], with some cases lasting up to 7 years [11].

These data show overtraining is a real challenge for athletes of all levels and we should not ignore risk factors and early signs. Furthermore, we should focus on prevention because OT might reappear several times during an athlete’s career.

With that said, we can’t exclude the possibility that some of these athletes were simply overreaching, so the prevalence stats might be inflated [1]. We will go into more detail regarding the distinction between overtraining and overreaching later.

Consequences of overtraining

What are the consequences of becoming overreached and/or overtrained? Generally speaking, overtraining affects several systems in the body. It could, arguably, lead to:

Acute and chronic immunosuppression [1, 12-14, 74]

[1, 12-14, 74] Mental health issues : depression, anxiety, and lowered libido [1, 2, 12-16]

: depression, anxiety, and lowered libido [1, 2, 12-16] Decreased performance [1, 5, 12, 14, 17, 30]

[1, 5, 12, 14, 17, 30] Weight loss [2, 12]

[2, 12] Sleep problems [1, 2, 5, 14, 19-20, 26, 34, 82, 176]

[1, 2, 5, 14, 19-20, 26, 34, 82, 176] Higher risk of injury [16, 17, 21, 22] which is also linked to improper periodisation and overuse [23]

[16, 17, 21, 22] which is also linked to improper periodisation and overuse [23] Fatigue [1, 3-5, 12, 14, 15, 18, 24-22, 176, 177]

[1, 3-5, 12, 14, 15, 18, 24-22, 176, 177] Increased risk of illness [12, 27]

[12, 27] Slow strength and endurance gains [28, 29]

However, as Meeusen et al., 2013 note, many of these signs of overtraining aren’t necessarily symptoms that can be used to diagnose an athlete. This is because many of the symptoms are similar between non-functional overreaching and overtraining. In addition, there is inter-individual variation when it comes to symptoms of overtraining [30]. With that said, if an athlete is feeling depressed, frequently sick, underperforming, losing weight, has sleep problems and feels fatigued, then there’s probably some issue that needs to be looked into. Writing it off as overreaching or ignoring it might be risky.

Overtraining: an outdated term

Overtraining is a term used term to describe excessive exercise. It has a few strengths and weaknesses. On one hand it is very intuitive and people generally understand what it refers to. But the term also has issues; it can be used to describe cause and effect:

“Overtraining can be viewed as the process by which sport and non-sport specific stressors combine to negatively affect the athlete, but it can also be considered an outcome because of the long-lasting decrement in performance, mood disturbances, fatigue and /or depression” (Winsley and Matos, 2011).

This is a problem because the term becomes a tautology (you are overtrained because you overtrained). This limits our understanding of the multiple causes of OT [8, 15, 18, 30, 31]. You would never say “he got fat because he fatted”. With this problem in mind, several authors suggest we need to redefine overtraining into something that is more comprehensive and doesn’t limit diagnosis [5, 8, 15, 18].

Renaming Overtraining to the Underperformance Syndrome

A new term was first introduced in 2000 by Budgett et al to replace overtraining. It was called the Unexplained Underperformance Syndrome.

We think “unexplained” is a needless part of the definition so for this review we stick with the term Underperformance Syndrome (UPS). This term is much more helpful than “overtraining” when trying to diagnose an athlete’s problems. This is because UPS doesn’t claim that there’s only one cause for the condition [15, 18]. Indeed, there are a myriad of possible causes for UPS, not just excessive exercise [11].

We consider Underperformance Syndrome to be the body’s response to excessive, long-term training and non-training stressors combined with poor recovery. Together, this leads to altered mood-states, physical underperformance, neuroendocrine changes, and increased risk of illness and injury. However, it is of utmost importance to properly identify UPS, because there are many illnesses and syndromes that mimic symptoms of UPS. Even overreaching has a lot of similarities to UPS.

Preventing underperformance



How to think about prevention and treatment

Since UPS can develop from many factors, it probably isn’t a good idea to assume there’s a single cause for UPS [1, 5]:

“A common misperception is that [Overtraining/UPS] is simply an issue about excessive training loads.”

(Winsley and Matos, 2011)

Though it is true that excessive exercise definitively can lead to UPS, it’s not the only cause, by far [1, 5, 11, 18]. We need to approach prevention and treatment of UPS from a bird's-eye view. If we choose a reductionistic perspective, we tend to tunnel-vision on single factors like heart rate or workload. This is not a good idea because many of the diagnostic criteria are affected by inter-individual variability (see discussion in “why it is difficult to diagnose UPS”). UPS develops from many causes, and we need to identify them [1, 5]. By ignoring some factors, we risk misdiagnosing the problem [5]. Hence we recommend that athletes, individuals, and coaches look at all the factors before they make a decision on how to proceed.

Preventing UPS from a mental aspect

During the past 30 years, more and more research has focused on the mental aspect of athletic performance. From many investigations, it’s quite clear that performance affects and is affected by emotional states [3, 33]. Whenever training load is drastically increased, our mood may degrade [1, 33-34], and when mood is worsened, performance drops [3]. Hence, mood and performance have a complex and perhaps symbiotic relationship.

Elite athletes have completely different mood profiles compared to the average population. This is called the “iceberg profile” [3]. As seen in the illustration below, these athletes score lower than the population average on negative moods, while they score much higher on feelings of vigour. But these mental benefits aren’t restricted to elite athletes, they also apply to active individuals [3].

The iceberg profile by Morgan et al., 1987

Mindset (expectation vs. reality)

It’s common for top athletes or aspiring athletes to have high expectations and the ability to push themselves, which allows them to perform at a high level. The issue with this resilience is that if combined with unrealistic expectations and perfectionism, it could lead the athlete to push himself or herself to the point of UPS [11, 18, 36-39]. Several research groups have now found associations between athletes’ feelings of self-worth and their sports performance. They now think that a perfectionistic drive to improve self-worth via sports is one of the ways athletes develop UPS [38-41]. Some athletes end up giving up their sport completely because of this pressure [39, 40].

Recent research now suggests both external perfectionism (expectations of others) and internal perfectionism (what you expect of yourself) both increase risk of burnout and giving up sports [40], as shown in the graph below. External expectations of perfection were much more likely to make the athlete feel burned out [185] and quit their sport [40].

Graph by Ho et al., 2015

If we were to apply this to our own lives, a good place to start would be your thoughts, expectations, and mindset. Do you need to win at all cost? Do you find yourself never satisfied? Do you think more is always better? Is your self-esteem tied up with your training goals and training performance? Are expectations from family, friends, and coaches stressing you out? If you answer yes to some of these, it’s possible that you might eventually be at risk for UPS. We’re not saying ambition and motivation are bad things, but at some point excessive and unrealistic expectations could be preventing progress, even if that sounds counter-intuitive.

Below we suggest some more science-based “prehab” UPS prevention strategies that should safeguard you from developing UPS.

Minimizing mental stress

Intuitively, it might seem unlikely that mental stress could lead to UPS. Even so, a lot of studies and reviews now suggest mental stress is a risk factors for UPS [3, 5, 30, 42, 47]. There are different explanations for why this might be.

Mental stress could:

Slow post-exercise recovery [43, 44]

Slow gains in performance, hypertrophy, and endurance [3, 28, 29]

Cause some active individuals to train even more [44]

Morgan et al. developed a mental health model which predicts performance:

"This mental health model assumes that positive mental health is associated with high performance levels, whereas mood disturbances are predicted to result in performance decrements. Predictions based upon this model have been found to have an accuracy of approximately 80% in a series of studies"

(Morgan et al., 1987)

This means that stressful situations like a breakup, death of a family member or close friend, or inter-personal conflicts could be triggers for lowered performance [28, 29] and possibly UPS. However, it is unlikely that mental stress would cause UPS by itself. The model does imply mental health and performance are not separated factors, but rather intertwined and interdependent [1, 3, 16, 28, 29, 33] For example, it’s hard to perform at your best if you’re depressed.

There are several ways to approach this challenge. First of all, it would be prudent to keep a mental-health diary. The most commonly used “mental diary” is the Profile of Moods (POMS) questionnaire which you can download here. It allows you to compare your mental state on a weekly or monthly basis, depending how often you take it. Changes in your mental health score could predict development of UPS. Below is a bar chart that compared healthy POMS scores to UPS scores (OTS = UPS).

Bar chart by Meeusen et al., 2013 (Adapted from Raglin & Morgan, 1994)

To destress, we have some obvious solutions, like spending more time with friends and family while limiting time spent on stressful activities like training or competition. Indeed, social support reduces burnout risk [46, 47].

A lot of research is now being done in alternative ways to lower stress levels. Recently, researchers have examined mind-body therapies and how they affect mental stress.

Mind-body therapies (meditation, relaxation techniques, yoga)

Mind-body therapies could:

Reduce mental stress and improve mood [11, 48, 50-54, 184]

Improve immune function [45, 55-58]

Improve sleep [59-61]

Reduce inflammation [62]

All of the factors mentioned above are linked to UPS. In addition to these benefits, there’s reason and evidence that mindfulness and mind-body therapies may prevent the development of UPS [63].

Illustration: Moen et al., 2015 (edited by us for clarity)

As you can see in this illustration, mindfulness was positively associated with sport and school achievement, and negatively associated with stress and burnout. At the same time, stress was positively associated with burnout, and negatively associated with both school and sport achievement. In some studies, subjects who were mentally stressed gained less strength and endurance compared to low-stress subjects [28, 29]. Practically speaking, it would be a good idea to start doing meditation or some sort of MBT when you feel you’re overreaching, feeling stressed out, or generally at risk for developing UPS.

The importance of social support and relationship with coach

Lu et al., dropped a very interesting study in 2016 about how an athlete's relationship with their coach is integral to their motivation [47]. They found that life stress was linked with burnout and so was poor support from the coach. When life stress was low, athletes who had poor support and little mental resilience were much more likely to feel burned out compared to athletes who were resilient and/or had better social support. But the magnitude changed when life stress was high, at which point most athletes felt burned out (5 times as many symptoms, compared to baseline). The athletes that were least likely to experience burnout had high mental resilience and solid support from their coach.

Check the graphs below for details:

Lu et al., 2016 - Figure 1: The relationship between informational support from coach and personal resilience

Lu et al., 2016 - Figure 2: The relationship between social support from coach and personal resilience

Other studies also affirm the importance of a good coach-athlete relationship when it comes to burnout [64].

If we condense the social research in the psychology sections of this guide, it is important to have a supportive coach that has realistic expectations for you and doesn’t force you to train more than you are capable of. The coach should help buffer the stress you feel going through life, and not add to it. Based on the evidence, a bad coach could make you feel burned out and possibly develop UPS.

Proper programming and periodisation

Improper periodization (excessive exercise combined with under-recovery) is one of the primary reasons athletes underperform [30]. Yet, athletes in sports with low physical demands can still develop UPS [30], so it’s possible to underperform due to non-training-related stressors [1, 5, 11, 18, 30, 176].

Researchers now recommend us to utilize proper periodisation to prevent UPS [10, 66, 183]. It’s beyond the scope of this review to explain programming and periodisation theory, but there are some practical principles we can follow to minimize risk of excessive training:

Keep a training log which includes Rate of Perceived Exertion (how difficult every exercise/drill felt), bodyweight, workout duration and intensity, volume (for resistance training), and any pains or aches [1, 10, 26, 183]. We recommend combining this training log with the mental health log described in the previous section.

which includes Rate of Perceived Exertion (how difficult every exercise/drill felt), bodyweight, workout duration and intensity, volume (for resistance training), and any pains or aches [1, 10, 26, 183]. We recommend combining this training log with the mental health log described in the previous section. Planned deloads : Follow a training program that has built-in periods of increasing total workload (overreaching) followed by periods of relatively lowered total workload. Deloads do not have to be complete absence from exercise or training.

: Follow a training program that has built-in periods of increasing total workload (overreaching) followed by periods of relatively lowered total workload. Deloads do not have to be complete absence from exercise or training. Reactive deloads : If the athlete feels symptoms of UPS, like worsened mood and excessive fatigue, it would be pertinent to reactively deload. Especially if these negative changes are accompanied by increased training stressors and non-training-related stressors.

: If the athlete feels symptoms of UPS, like worsened mood and excessive fatigue, it would be pertinent to reactively deload. Especially if these negative changes are accompanied by increased training stressors and non-training-related stressors. Personalized periodization [1]: Changes should be made to the program if it’s too hard or too easy. This could be done by manipulating weekly volume, intensity, duration, and frequency in response to how the athlete feels and performs. Some athletes may respond well to high volumes with low training frequencies, while others might respond better to high intensities. Personalization requires the coach and athlete to accept the notion that more isn’t always better.

How long can you train hard?

“4 weeks is considered the maximum time that athletes can withstand intensification of already high training loads”

(MacKinnon, 2000)

We also want to warn about training too hard in a single session. A potentially life-threatening condition called Exertional Rhabdomyolysis could develop [67-72, 178-179]. Worst case scenario, this condition could lead to kidney failure [69, 72, 73]. For example, one Norwegian man was hospitalized with Rhabdomyolysis after a bout of crossfit where he was tasked to do 45 overhead squats followed by 90 pullups, no breaks. Obviously, this condition only occurs in extreme circumstances, but athletes should be aware of the possibility nonetheless.

Recovery

A consensus statement from the European College of Sport Science and the American College of Sports Medicine recommends at least one rest day per week to prevent UPS [1].

As we’ve mentioned previously, mental stress could impact recovery. There are some researchers that have specific recommendations for this:

"Stress, (...) moderated the recovery trajectories of muscular function and somatic sensations in a 96-hour period after strenuous resistance exercise. Therefore, under conditions of inordinate stress, individuals may need to be more mindful about observing an appropriate length of recovery."

(Stults-Kolehmainen et al., 2014)

Illnesses, infections, and diseases

It would also be a good idea to temporarily stop training or reduce workload in the case of illnesses, infections, diseases, or injuries [1, 12, 26, 74]. It’s hard to give specific recommendations on this because these problems can vary in their duration and how debilitating they are. But as a general rule of thumb, pushing yourself when you are sick or injured, is not a good idea yet moderate exercise is okay when the symptoms are mild [1, 12, 26, 27]. Just be careful, because infections and illness are associated with Non-Functional Overreaching and/or UPS [8, 12, 26]. Researchers speculate this happens due to immunosuppression and/or altered immune function.

Furthermore, excessive alcohol drinking can impair recovery, reduce immune function, and should be avoided if maximal performance is the goal [27, 75-78]. However, light drinking is probably safe [76]. Just be careful not to drink excessively up to 72 hours after intense exercise, when immune function may be temporarily decreased. This is called the open window theory [74] and its duration may be altered by recovery and exercise:

“With insufficient rest there can be a cumulative effect of consecutive days of intensive training (i.e. the “window” staying open for a longer period of time)”

(Hackney and Koltun, 2012)

Graph based on materials from Hackney, 2013

Some research groups think the data on the open window is limited and causal links between exercise, immunosuppression, and infection risk haven’t been fully established yet [1, 79, 80]. A recent review explains some interesting new developments in sports immunology; like some athletes may have a genetic predisposition for upper respiratory illness. The suggested explanation is that the athletes have a stronger inflammatory response to exercise, which could affect immunity [81]. This makes us speculate: Is there a genetic basis for UPS? Are some individuals predisposed to UPS?

Sleep

As individuals overreach and underperform, they might experience sleep issues [2, 5, 14, 18, 19, 34, 82] but sleep issues might also lead to UPS [1, 26]. Hence sleep problems might be one of the causes and effects of UPS.

Research shows sleep is important for the immune system and chronic sleep loss can predispose athletes to sickness [83]. Prolonged periods of disturbed sleep can reduce cognitive ability, worsen mood state and slow motor skill acquisition – all of which affect performance [20, 176]. Tying into the hormonal section of this review, some of these disturbances could be responsible for sleep disturbances [84].

As mentioned previously, meditation and reduced workload could alleviate sleep issues [59-61]. Given that sleep is so important for recovery [20, 85, 86], it would be best to get adequate sleep on a frequent basis [10, 20, 85]. Some authors suggest at least 7-9 hours per night to maintain athletic performance [20, 85]. Sleep deprivation and getting less than 6-7 hours of sleep per night is associated with impaired immune and cognitive function, slow recovery, impaired glycogen repletion, worsened mental health (including depression), pain, and a host of various diseases and illnesses [20, 85-92]. Getting more than 9 hours of sleep per night might be a good idea if you are recovering from illness or injury [85, 92].

Some researchers note that there’s not enough evidence that performance becomes worse with short-term sleep loss and they would like to see more evidence before they can provide objective sleep recommendations [93, 94].

Nutrition

There are numerous opinions on how nutrition affects UPS. Some focus on how important high carbohydrate and fluid intake is to prevent glycogen depletion and dehydration [1]. While others recommend a sliding scale of carb intake that is closely matched to the predicted energy expenditure of athletes [95].

Protein is also critical, with inadequate protein intake reported in some chronically fatigued athletes [96]. In fact, endurance athletes who increase their daily protein intake to 3g/kg during a period of overreaching have better performance and less of a stress response to training [97]. Other research shows 1.7g/kg/day is not sufficient to improve performance and recovery [98].

In respect to resistance training, supplementing with amino acids may help preserve performance and alleviate muscle soreness (DOMS) [99]. Moreover, high protein diets can reduce the risk of upper respiratory tract infection during high intensity training [97].

There’s no perfect diet to prevent UPS [100, 101]. However, chronic glycogen depletion could lead to UPS [102-104]. Low muscle glycogen can impair performance because of inadequate fuel for training [105]. Furthermore, a lack of fruit and vegetables can also lead to slower rates of muscle regeneration [8]. It can also impair sleep, which increases the risk of UPS [100]. However, one study of swimmers who consumed low carbohydrates experience more fatigue but do not reach the threshold needed to have UPS [106].

A simple way to avoid low glycogen levels is to avoid low carb and keto diets. Training with low glycogen levels may increase inflammatory cytokines, which contributes to UPS [107]. Meal timing may matter as well because glycogen resynthesis is elevated post-exercise. Practically speaking, we could eat carbs and protein after exercise to maximize resynthesis between training sessions [108-110, 186]. This is probably more important for athletes who train multiple times per day.

Many athletes travel, which can make proper nutrition more difficult. This can in turn contribute to risk of UPS by creating inadequate protein, carbohydrate or total energy intake. We know proper nutritional intake is important, so it’s no surprise that avoiding nutritional deficiencies should be part of preventing UPS. The literature also leans toward a higher carbohydrate and protein intake for athletes to enhance performance and recovery.

Energy Balance

Caloric restriction, insufficient carbohydrate and/or protein intake, iron deficiency, and magnesium deficiency have all been recognized as factors that could influence overreaching and UPS [192].

Despite the elevated energy requirements of frequent training [111-114] and increased lean mass, some research indicates that many athletes fail to consume enough calories to maintain energy balance [147]. A survey of elite junior athletes revealed that a high proportion were not in energy balance, failed to meet carbohydrate or micronutrient recommendations, and presented with depleted stores of iron and vitamin D [115].

You may have noticed that when you increase training volume you tend to eat more. Like eating a large pizza after leg day. However, large energy expenditure by athletes does not necessarily induce a compensatory increase in food consumption [66]. Possible reasons for poor intake include; lack of appetite and lack of awareness about the importance of food.

A negative energy balance is a risk factor for UPS since it can increase fatigue and RPE [1, 8]. Low energy availability have been directly linked to performance in athletes [1]. For instance, one study found athletes in an energy deficit of ~8% for 12 weeks had decreased performance after 6 weeks [116]. In addition to that, long-term caloric restriction can lead to changes in hormonal status and muscle mass especially in physique athletes [117, 118].

If an athlete is going to be in a carbohydrate restricted state they should be aware of creating a negative energy balance, which carries a high risk of maladaptation, infection and UPS [8]. Basically, if an athlete is going to use a low carbohydrate diet they should be careful with training load/intensity.

Ultimately, overreaching while in a caloric deficit for long periods may lead to UPS.

Below we have some nutritional strategies you can use to improve immune function. This should help, because lowered immunity could lead to UPS.

Table by Gunzer et al., 2012

Recovering from overtraining (underperformance)



Mind-body therapies

Mind-body therapies (MBT) like yoga, mindfulness, meditation, and stress-management could speed up the recovery from UPS. In one study, athletes who were diagnosed with UPS were assigned to a MBT group, and they compared their UPS recovery to a control group. The MBT group returned 8-10% faster to their previous training capacity. With that said, their recovery was still incomplete 2 years after they had started the recovery program [11].



Table from (Brooks et al., 2013). SM = Stress Management group.

Sadly, there isn’t a ton of direct studies on how to treat UPS with MBT, but there are studies on prevention. It’s highly likely that there’s overlap between UPS prevention and treatment. For example, good mindsets, good social support, and a realistic coach all help prevent UPS development. Those things don’t suddenly become unimportant once an athlete is underperforming. Now the question is whether changing mindset, improving social support, and getting a better coach speed up the recovery process. Sadly, there’s not enough evidence for us to answer that… Yet.

Go to the prevention section to learn more.

Rest

When prevention fails, rest seems to be the main treatment for UPS, despite the fact that you may become deconditioned during this time [1-4]. The length of rest can vary from six to twelve weeks or more. It can be very difficult to expect highly motivated individuals to simply stop exercising. Some data indicates that low level exercise can benefit recovery [3, 24]. It is still unclear whether complete rest or relative rest is most beneficial, so motivation for exercise should be considered [10, 24]. Treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor could be beneficial based on the similarities between neuroendocrine changes involved in depression and UPS [119]. In addition, if sleep disturbance is prominent, treatment with sleep aids could be beneficial [119].

Diagnosing overtraining (underperformance)

Diagnose yourself using this flowchart!

Chart by Meeusen et al., 2013

One of the most difficult parts of UPS is diagnosis. As you can see in the chart above, it is mainly a diagnosis of exclusion because we must systematically rule out other potential things that could make you underperform [26]. Hence, we should exclude certain disease states that share many common qualities with UPS including; endocrinological disorders (thyroid or adrenal gland, diabetes, vitamin D deficiency), anaemia, or infectious diseases (including viruses, hepatitis, mononucleosis etc.) [10]. Other major disorders such as anorexia, bulimia and depression should also excluded. However, some of these may occur in parallel with UPS, which is why it is so difficult to diagnose. The term “syndrome” emphasizes that training is not the sole causative factor [66].

Underperformance persists despite a period of recovery lasting months or years [10-11, 15]. Importantly, as there is no diagnostic tool to identify an athlete as suffering from overtraining, diagnosis can only be made by excluding all other possible influences on changes in performance and mood state. In other words, if no explanation for the observed changes can be found, UPS is diagnosed.

Despite decades of research on the syndrome of UPS, early and unequivocal recognition is difficult because the only consistent sign is a decrease in performance with continued training.

The symptoms associated with UPS vary between individuals, but there is some data to suggest that those in aerobic sports may have changes such as fatigue, depression, resting HR changes and apathy which are typically linked to parasympathetic alterations. In contrast, those in anaerobic sports often have sympathetic changes, such as insomnia, irritability, agitation and increased heart-rate or blood pressure [1, 66, 121].

Why it is difficult to diagnose underperformance

Overreaching, underperforming, and chronic fatigue syndrome

Underperformance Syndrome is notoriously difficult to diagnose because it closely resembles overreaching [1, 32]. Overreaching occurs when we temporarily push beyond our ability to recover [1, 32]. Planned overreaching (aka functional overreaching) is used by athletes, powerlifters, etc. to improve their performance. This type of overreaching is functional because it pushes the body to adapt without pushing it too far [1, 32]. However, this requires a short break or deload after overreaching [1, 32]. The methods vary and are beyond the scope of this article, but there are numerous resources if you need more information.

The illustration below shows the training spectrum.

Illustration from Carfagno and Hendrix, 2014

Though overreaching can be a useful tool, it can be a gateway to something worse. Several authors now think extended overreaching (training hard for a couple of weeks) can turn into Non-functional Overreaching (NFOR) [32]. NFOR is very similar to UPS in its symptoms which makes it very difficult to distinguish between the two conditions [1, 32]. However, most researchers argue it takes less time to recover from NFOR [32]. It takes more than four weeks of intensified exercise to induce UPS [13].

Yet, that’s just from the perspective of training. There are now several studies that indicate athletes can get UPS without increasing their training load [13].

Eventually, if an athlete continues to push him or herself beyond their capacity, they might eventually develop UPS [1]. Some authors now speculate that UPS links with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) [11, 13, 18, 187]. A debilitating fatigue disorder that could take years to fully recover from [187]. It’s possible that overreaching, UPS, and CFS exist on a continuum where more stress pushes athletes toward the unsafe side of the spectrum while recovery moves athletes towards “safety” (see illustration below) [1,11, 13, 187].

Illustration partially based on materials from Carfagno and Hendrix, 2014

From an analytical perspective, this continuum makes it very difficult to properly identify whether an athlete is overreaching, underperforming, or chronically fatigued. However, one diagnostic criteria is to see how long it takes the athlete to fully recover (given cessation from training). If it takes a week, it’s probably functional overreaching. Two weeks, it might be NFOR. A month or two, perhaps UPS. A year or two, CFS. The problem is that this diagnosis can only happen after the athlete has fully recovered (retrospectively) [8]. And what’s the point of diagnosis at that point? You’d want a diagnosis as soon as possible when the athlete is starting to show symptoms of UPS.

Furthermore, there’s yet no agreed-upon definition of UPS and its many name variants [32]. It’s quite clear that we need to agree upon a definition before we can handle this challenge. Creating a more coherent and comprehensive understanding of UPS is one of our goals in this review.

Individual variation and genetic influences

Many studies have tried to diagnose UPS in various populations. Not only do they have problems because it is hard to distinguish UPS from OR [1], but also because people experience wildly different symptoms [1, 13, 15, 30, 122]. Some people may become depressed, while others become angry. Some may develop sleep problems, while others lose their sense of hunger and thus lose weight. Furthermore, biomarkers like hormone secretion and heart-rate may vary intra-individually and inter-individually [8, 12, 31, 66,123]. This variation makes diagnosis difficult because few diagnostic criteria apply to everyone [8, 123]. People also have varying training tolerances:

“It is hard to tell if overtraining has occurred because of individual differences in training tolerance. Overtraining for one person may be optimal training for another.”

(Brooks et al., 2013)

It is difficult to determine exactly where the inter-individual variation comes from. Some argue it is genetically predetermined [124]. Recently, several genetic mutations (polymorphisms) have been identified [125, 126]. These polymorphisms could influence training adaptations [127, 128]. There also appears to be an inter-individual differences to endurance or strength training programs [129]. We could even classify individuals as non-, moderate, or extreme responders based on genetics [130-133, 191]. Yet, some disagree since almost everyone adapts in some capacity [134].

These responder phenotypes may not apply directly to studies examining elite athletes because they are presumably hard-working and genetically gifted. However, inter-individual differences could occur because studies lack a high enough population to find a group-type physiological differences even at the elite level. Yet, almost all of the studies are powered properly and can find statistical differences. For example, one method that has come to the forefront of data interpretation is effect size, which is often used in meta-analysis [135-138]. If studies had more homogenous methods, then we could pool them and have a better picture. In the future larger studies with genetic and epigenetic research may shed even more light on the subject of UPS.

Physical factors

Some athletes may recover from a state of overreaching in two weeks [139-141], and this condition is a relatively normal and harmless stage of the training process. If an athlete starts to present more evident problems such as sleep disturbances, loss of weight or appetite, reduced libido, and heavy legs the concern for UPS should escalate [2, 12].

Injury risk is another critical factor associated with UPS. It’s particularly important to avoid injury and illness because it can lead to worsened long-term athletic performance [142]. This is because program adherence correlates with achieving training goals [142].

One review found UPS can lead to increased injury risk in elite athletes [16]. Another found that there was a linear relationship between hours of sport play and injury, with athletes who trained more than 16 hours/week having an increased risk of injury. In fact, volume and intensity of training are correlated with overuse injury risk [17]. Though some believe other factors play a bigger role [5]. An acute injury is easily diagnosed, but those related to overuse are much more difficult. Some studies suggest that high absolute loads are not the problem, rather the sharp increase in load compared to normal training [22].



Figure by Soligard et al., 2016

Physiology

Illustration by Fry et al., 1991

There are numerous biomarkers that may identify UPS which include: inflammatory cytokines, plasma glutamine, creatine kinase activity, blood lactate, and testosterone:cortisol ratio – all of which have differing amounts of data to support them [143].

Among the numerous issues with biomarkers, reliability is a big one. We have to identify changes not only from an athlete’s baseline, but also from OR to truly distinguish when athletes are entering UPS. As you can imagine, the sheer number of studies on biomarkers can be overwhelming, thus we have whittled it down for relevance.

When we think of biomarkers, the most common thought is quantification via blood markers. However, new technology has enabled many biomarkers to be drawn from saliva [123]. Saliva can be taken rapidly, and more important - noninvasively. However, biomarkers in blood are found at a much higher concentration than in saliva [144]. This is important if we have to hit a threshold for detection.

First, let’s identify the major hypothesis within the literature. I’ve honestly never seen so many for one non-disease related problem.

The Cytokine Hypothesis speculates there is a high level of microtrauma to joints, muscle and connective tissue from high volume exercise, which results in local and systemic inflammation. As a result, inflammatory proteins (cytokines, lymphocytes, neutrophils and monocytes) are increased in order to act directly on multiple physiological systems resulting in a disruption of homeostasis. Some of these include IL-6, and TNF-alpha. Glutamine is metabolized at a high rate by immune cells, although it is unclear how changes in plasma glutamine relate to immune status in athletes [13, 145]. An elevated white cell count can even be severe enough to temporarily mimic sepsis [146]. Further confounding these potential markers are changes due to training. For example, neutrophil number may remain elevated for several hours post exercise, but lymphocyte and natural killer cells are depressed [74, 147]. Athletes have normal resting leukocyte counts [148], but endurance athletes can have lower counts [150]. It is likely that small changes in numerous immune markers can synergize to make athletes more susceptible to sickness due to a lower host defense [150].

The HPA Hypothesis notes that prolonged training can cause an autonomic imbalance, resulting in a reduced responsiveness to acetylcholine, which the body then compensates by increasing secretion from the pituitary gland. The idea is the body can compensate in an overreached state until the physiological strain is too much. Ultimately, athletes will cease to compensate with increased ACTH levels and show signs of fatigue [11]. There’s a lot more to this idea, but the data supporting it is scarce.

The Glycogen Depletion Hypothesis supposes that reduced glycogen causes increased oxidation and decreased levels of BCAA which may be involved in fatigue development [10]. If you’ve ever trained while on a long-term caloric deficit you have probably experienced a decrease in performance. Indeed, some studies have found a single bout of short-term exhaustive exercise can reduce glycogen stores ~25-30% [151-158] and low levels of glycogen have been associated with impairments of performance even in short-term exercise [151, 152, 157]. However, some scientists believe there may be another mechanism responsible because if athletes increase their carbohydrate intake they can still suffer from UPS [106, 159]. Others have proposed that elevated levels of catecholamines may reduce glycogen synthesis after intense exercise [160, 161]. We also know that some cytokines can decrease hunger, which could further reduce glycogen stores [162]. What’s interesting is this hypothesis inherently ties in with the BCAA Hypothesis which is based on the blood-brain barrier. Briefly, serotonin precursor (5-HT) competes with BCAA for the same carrier, but exercise causes increased oxidation of BCAA, which then facilitates increased tryptophan entry into the brain. Yet, if athletes are consuming adequate protein this may not be an issue.

If we take all of these into account rather than look at them on an individual basis, it appears that these responses fit the third stage of the General Adaptation Syndrome [163] and they might be more related to survival than adaptation [13]. Interestingly, energy expenditure can be redirected to immune or HPA function which may further decrease adaptation to training. Often the most difficult interpretation is when these biomarkers are changed, which confounds our ability to determine if one system alone is responsible. It’s a very standard problem in the human body, everything interacts as a system, not an island.

What about the hormone hypothesis?! I can hear the echoes already. Enter, the testosterone:cortisol (T:C) ratio, often used as an indicator of anabolic/catabolic balance. Testosterone’s role in exercise is becoming more controversial – or the idea that it may play a more important role in muscle metabolism during recovery [137, 138] (for review see Tzur 2016) than in muscle growth [164, 165]. Cortisol is perceived as a catabolic hormone, but is known to elevate metabolic rate [166]. Elevated cortisol could translate to long-term consequences affecting body composition or glycogen storage. The T:C ratio decreases in relation to intensity and duration of exercise, as well as during periods of intense training [167]. Only a few studies have shown value in assessing training status through testosterone:cortisol ratio [101, 188-189]. While others have not.

Almost all hormones are under some type of feedback control, some by other hormones, metabolites or other factors. The feedback relationship is the reason why assessment is so difficult. If we look back to the introduction, we must view UPS as the end of a continuum with the result being a maladaptation of multiple systems [1]. Some of these responses also occur in a chronic energy deficiency with sports, regardless of training status. There are other problems with biomarker data including exercise conditions, nutrition, circadian pulsatility, female hormonal cycles, and stress.

The most challenging factor in recognizing OTS is that it usually develops slowly over months, so if we’re not tracking it frequently we may miss physiological changes.

Psychology

Table by Angeli et al., 2004

The complex nature of emotions

As we've mentioned in the prevention section, there are links between mood and performance. In addition, there are also links between mood <-> immune function [27, 168], and mood <-> hormones [12]. Other factors affect mental health as well, like the microbiome [169, 170, 190]. In addition to these links, there’s evidence that hormones modulate immunity [12] and that mental stress leads to hormonal changes and increased disease risk [171]. Psychological stress is associated with illness [27].

If we look at UPS, many studies and reviews find that certain mood-states can lead to the development of UPS, and UPS itself could negatively affect mood-states [1, 2, 12, 32].

This data just underlines how important it is for us to have a macro perspective when analyzing underperformance. Many of the systems we’re looking at are interconnected and a change in one system will probably affect other systems. If we were to speculate, could an unhealthy diet negatively affect the microbiome which would in turn affect mental health which then would increase risk of UPS?

You can look at your mental state to see if you're at risk of underperformance, as per the POMS chart (OTS = overtraining):

Bar chart by Meeusen et al., 2013 (Adapted from Raglin & Morgan, 1994)

Resistance training and underperformance

Underperformance syndrome is mainly studied in endurance athletes and these type of athletes accrue much more training volume than people who resistance train. For example, a long distance runner may spend 10+ hours a week actually running, while a resistance-based athlete will only spend a very small amount of time moving weight. Even though this is at a higher magnitude it still gives the body more time to adapt. There are multiple Olympic and National distances in endurance events, yet powerlifting and bodybuilding are not as popular - though they are gaining ground quickly.

There are a few studies that attempt to measure UPS in resistance exercise. Dr. Fry created a system where subjects would complete ten reps of a 1RM (smith machine) squat every day for two weeks. We know that there is a difference of trained vs untrained, so it’s important to mention these subjects were trained for ~4 yrs and could squat at least 1.5x bodyweight.

Per Meeusen’s guidelines, there was one indication of UPS: Fry caused a decrease in performance. His subjects had a 10-15% drop in 1RM squat after two weeks straight of training at 10 sets of 1 rep at 1RM [143, 144, 172-175]. There are several issues with Fry’s experimental idea of UPS in RT:

- Two minute rests between reps

- The weight was dropped 4.5kg on a missed lift

- Unrealistic training method

- The OT group was eating +1100kcal

Different physiological responses occur in aerobic and anaerobic training [180-182]. During the Fry studies and others [15], there is no iceberg profile, or association of POMS with performance. This could make it more difficult to track mental health. However, training session questionnaires did indicate the UPS group in one study did not look forward to the daily sessions and reported decreased perceptions of strength and recovery. Another study by Fry indicates there was 2-8 week period before members of the OT group could utilize previous levels of training [34]. This means, the subjects in Fry’s studies may not have had UPS because they returned to normal within ~8 weeks. Based on all of Fry’s work we can sum it up as: intensity-related UPS does not alter resting hormones associated with decreased performance, but volume-related UPS does appear to significantly change hormone concentrations.

One of the limitations in resistance training studies is that muscle strength is usually preserved during UPS, but power and sprinting are the first types of performance to decrease. Therefore, athletes may feel sluggish and perform worse, which could lead to a downward spiral of mental and physical health while they continue to try and push through training.

Conclusions

Researchers are slowly but surely charting the complex and intertwined nature of underperformance (UPS), which is more commonly known as “overtraining”. We posit, along with several research groups, that Underperformance Syndrome is a much more appropriate term for this phenomenon. “Overtraining” is outdated and limits investigation into prevention and treatment by relying on tautological reasoning (see the “Overtraining: an outdated term” section for details). UPS deals with the complex interplay between emotions, immunity, neuro-endocrinology, diseases, illnesses, and athletic performance.

The consensus in the scientific literature is that once you’ve developed UPS, your options are very limited. There is no magical cure or quick fix to this long-term problem. The optimal solution to UPS is to prevent it from ever happening. However, what underperformance is varies by the individual, so any given training program needs to be personalized.

Generally speaking, the body adapts best to small, frequent challenges followed by proper recovery rather than massive challenges all at once. In fact, from our findings in this article, we would say massive challenges (acute or chronic overtraining) is not a good way to progress a training program.

We propose several strategies for preventing UPS, including properly periodised and individualized training programs, training logs, periodic mental-health self-assessment, avoiding long-term caloric deficits, eating sufficient carbohydrates, having social support, sleep recommendations, meditation/yoga, and using planned and reactive deloads. Please see Infographics, “Preventing UPS” and “Treating UPS” for details (click links to be taken there directly).

Limitations

The research community has a couple of limitations when studying UPS. First, it’s often considered unethical to push subjects into a maladaptive state, so when planning these studies investigators must keep IRB approval in mind. This limitation makes it difficult to do long-term RCTs where we intentionally induce UPS in subjects. Another limitation is distinguishing between UPS, OR and NFOR which can be difficult. Many studies often confuse these states because changes in biological markers (i.e. heart rate, testosterone, etc.) and subjective feelings (fatigue, loss of motivation, etc.) can be very similar in UPS and NFOR.

A further consideration is how relevant the results are for athletes of different competitive levels. We know that professional/elite athletes train more than amateur athletes, but how do we extrapolate data for each group? For example, elite athletes often have different mood-states than the population average. This could be a confounder because long-term emotional profiles can affect and be affected by UPS. Also, professional athletes may be more likely to become depressed when underperforming because their sport is their livelihood.

PED use occurs in some elite athletes, which they may not admit. It could alter the applicability and outcome of studies. It’s possible that drug use could increase work capacity and therefore lower risk of UPS. Conversely, it could increase risk of UPS because athletes could push themselves harder and longer, which eventually might lead to a crash if they temporarily go off a cycle and continue with the same workload. Hence PEDs could create unrealistic expectations which is a risk factor for UPS.

There were also limitations to the studies, reviews, and meta-analyses we looked at. Several of the articles were non-comprehensive, biased, or had methodological problems. For example, Rice et al. (2016) mention that only 25% of the mental health studies they reviewed were “well reported or methodologically rigorous”. Another problem with mental-health studies, especially those utilizing questionnaires, is that subjects might “fake good” when answering personal questions about topics such as feelings and abilities [1]. “Faking good” is basically pretending to be happy, strong, etc. when one is not. This could be particularly prevalent in elite athletes because they might fear they will suffer negative consequences if they tell their team, assisting personnel, researchers, or coach that they are underperforming or feeling depressed, because they might be cut from the team. On the other hand, it’s possible they simply want to present themselves in the best possible light (“social desirability”) [1]. Who wants to be known as the depressed underperformer in an olympic team? Hence, it’s possible UPS prevalence is underreported for these reasons.

However we have partially eliminated individual article bias because of the sheer magnitude of the literature we analysed. Indeed, we’ve done a non-systematic review of over 150+ scientific articles.

Finally, we cannot exclude the possibility of our own bias, a common trap for any author, scientist, or researcher. We have tried to minimize bias by looking at data comprehensively and thoroughly before writing conclusions. We have also cross-checked and examined claims and statements, and we’ve spent many hours discussing the applicability, validity, relevance, and quality of the literature. To determine whether the articles we’ve looked at were of sufficient merit, we’ve assessed each article in a pooled 155+ page long document which analyses quotes, limitations, quality, importance, possible conflict of interest, etc.

Audio

This is the audio from the video. You can download the podcast on Souncloud if you want it on-the-go (click the little arrow that points down).

Further reading

We have noted several excellent reviews for further reading on the subject of UPS which include:

Meeusen et al., 2013

Lewis et al., 2015

Soligard et al., 2016

Kreher, 2016

Schwellnus, 2016

Terminology list

UPS = Underperformance Syndrome

MBT = Mind-body therapy

OTS = Overtraining syndrome

OT = Overtraining

POMS = Profile of Moods

HRV = Heart rate variability

HR = Heart rate

NFOR = Nonfunctional overreaching

FOR = Functional overreaching

[themify_box]This article is written by Adam Tzur and Brandon Roberts. Check Brandon’s Facebook and website for more high-quality content. Here’s my Facebook. Feel free to subscribe to my mailing list on the right side if you would like to be notified of content like this. I post about anything fitness and nutrition related ~Adam[/themify_box]

References