NEW LIGHT ON THE INCORRECT READING OF "TUTANKHAMEN" ("Tutankhamen" was a HAKAN of the Ancient Turanian State of Masar / Misir) by POLAT KAYA (Copyright © 2006 Polat Kaya)









INTRODUCTION





The "Egyptian" king's name "TUTANKHAMEN" has not been presented to the world correctly. In this presentation, I want to share my reading of the hieroglyphic form of the title "TUTANKHAMEN". The name "TUTANKHAMEN" is indicated as being the name of the 12th king of the 18th Dynasty of ancient Masar/Misir (falsely named "Egypt"). Actually this is not a "name", but rather, a "title" which is composed to mean and/or indicate specific attributes of the king - as was done for all other ancient Masarian kings. This king's title is shown in hieroglyphic writing in his cartouche. The name "Tutankhamen" with which the public is familiar, that is, the present reading of his cartouche, does not give a true picture of the reality of what is on the cartouche. So much so that it gives the impression the presented reading was an intentional distortion of this ancient king's title from its original form.





The second symbol (normally "white and black" checkerboard, in this case in "black") at the top left, we are told, has the phonetic value of "MEN" [2 (p. cxlvi)]. This is coming from the Turkish word "MEN" meaning "I am" or "myself". Turkish "MEN" has also been altered into the form of the English word "man".



The 3rd symbol (wavy symbol) just below the checkerboard has the phonetic value of "N" [2 (p. 1)] or "EN" or "AN".



The first and second symbols together, and frequently the first, second and third symbols alltogether have the phonetic value of "AMEN, AMUN" [2 (p. 52-53), 3 (p. 170)]. In my rendering, it is also has the phonetic value of "O-MEN" and "I-MEN" (1-MEN).







Second line:



The second line consist of four symbols: the semi-circular black symbol represents the letter "T"; the bird symbol (bildircin yavrusu) represents the letter "U"; the third symbol is "T" again, and the fourth symbol is called "ANKH". We are told that it means "Life" and that it was worn as a good luck charm. The Ankh was used as a protective amulet in the ancient Masarian (Misir) culture. All Masarian (Misir) kings are shown with an "ankh" in their hands.



But "ANKH" was much more than a good luck charm. First of all, the ANKH is a stylized representation of "God", "man" and "life". The ANKH sign is a representation of "God" because God was regarded as a man. After all God made man in his own image - implying that God looks like man. The ANKH sign is a representation of "man" because the top oval is man's head. The horizontal line represents the two arms of man and the bottom part of the ANKH represents the rest of man's body. Man's body has "life" in it which is defined and described by the Turkish words "CAN" meaning "life", "CANLI" meaning "with life" and "MEN" meaning "myself". Christianity usurped this ancient Turanian symbol as a "CRUX ANSATA" [4 (p. 244] or "ANSATE CROSS"[4 (p. 44].



Furthermore, the ANKH sign, as I see it, is a stylized writing of "O-T" where the oval is the O and the remainder of the Ankh is the T. In Turkish, this can be read as:

a) OT (OD) meaning "Fire" - a metaphor for the SUN - UTU was the Sun God in the Turco-Sumerian language.

b) O-aTa meaning "He is Father" or "That Father" - a metaphor for God and "ancestor";

c) O-Te (O-De, De O) meaning "It is Word" - a metaphor equating the power of speech with God, hence, "Deo" (Theo) meaning "God".

d) O TU ( O DU) meaning "he is"; UTU the Sun-God.



Finally the ANKH symbol has the phonetic value of "ANKH" or "ANGH". This sounds like Turkish "ANG" as in the Turkish words "TANGRI" or "TENGRI" meaning "God" or "TUTANG" (TUTAN) meaning "holding" or "ruling".



Third line:





The first symbol is called "crook" in English and has the phonetic value of "HEQ" or "HAQ" [2 (p. cxxxvi) standing for "rule, reign, govern", 3 (p. 164)]. This is like the Turkish word "HAK" meaning "right", "justice", "law", "equity" and "God".



The second symbol (tower) has a phonetic value of "AN"[2 (p. cxxxii), 3 (p. 162)].



The third symbol ("lotus" plant, [Tr. "su ot" meaning "water plant"]), we are told, has the phonetic value of "SU" [2 (p. cxx11)]. It can additionally be read as the Turkish words "US", "USU" and "SHU", "ISHU".



The presented name of "TUTANKHAMEN" ("TUT-ANKH-AMEN") consists of only the first seven symbols of the complete text. The first seven symbols of the cartouche are "A-MEN-N-T-U-T-ANKH" (AMEN-AN-TUT-ANKH) , but they have not been presented to us in that written order. "TUTANKHAMEN" is an altered form of the first seven symbols "A-MEN-N-T-U-T-ANKH" . The rest of the title in the cartouche (i.e., the third line) is not even mentioned. When the title is presented as "TUTANKHAMEN", the real title of this king is not fully and accurately presented. The Turanian identity of the title given to this ancient Masarian (MISIR) king has been suppressed (cut). In this article, I will present the full title of this king as it is written in his cartouche.



MY READINGS OF THE CARTOUCHE TITLE TEXT OF "TUTANKHAMUN":



With all of this background information, now let us read the title of this ancient Masarian king so-called "TUTANKHAMUN":



Reading in the order of the hieroglyphic writing shown in the cartouche and using the phonetical forms of the symbols, I read the title of the King as follows in its phonetic values:



"A-MEN-N-T-U-T-ANKH-HAQ-AN-USU" which is much longer than the presented name "T-U-T-ANKH-AMEN".



The comparison is rather striking. Clearly a major portion of the name is missing and what is presented is not shown in the right order. In other words, the real title has been chopped and rearranged. Even in its phonological written form, the real title "A-MEN-N-T-U-T-ANKH-HAQ-AN-USU" is very different from the popularized and alienated form of "TUTANKHAMUN".



When we read these phonetic values of the given picture-writing phonetically as in Turkish, we get a number of Turkish expressions that describe God and also the King himself. Ancient Masarian kings, like all other ancient Turanian kings regarded themselves as "God" on earth and accordingly composed their kingship titles to reflect this. This king's title is also composed in this manner but it is in Turkish.





1. First reading:



1a) "A MEN AN TUTANG HAKAN US U"



(O Men Gök Tutan Hakan usu) meaning:



"That Man is the Sky-Holding Great-King of Wisdom", that is,

"Amen (Amun) is the Sky-Holding Great-King of Wisdom" or

"Amen (Amun) is the Sky-Ruling Great-King of Wisdom"



In this Turkish expression of the King's title, the universal Sky-Father-God (AMEN, O-MEN) is described as the Great-Wise-King that holds up the sky and rules it. Alternatively, the title reads in Turkish:



"Men O Gök Tutan Hakan usu" meaning:



"I am That Sky-Holding Great-King of Wisdom",



With this form of the expression in Turkish, the King is declaring and deifying himself as the Sky-God.



In these expressions, the Turkish words:



O means, "he/she/it" and "that",

TUTANG (TUTAN) means "he who holds" or "he who rules",

AN (GÖK, GÖY, KÖY) means "sky" or "village" or "country",

HAKAN means "great king" or "king of kings", "great ruler",

US (USU) means "wisdom" and "wise" or in the form of

US U means "it is wisdom, it is knowledge, it is wise".

However, when the hieroglyphic symbol for S in USU is read as Sh (Ș in Turkish), USU then becomes UȘU (IȘU) meaning "light".





In this form of the King's title, the writing first invokes the name of the Sky-Father-God (GÖK-ATA-TANRI) as a respect to God. This is like the Islamic saying: "BISMILLAH-IRRAHMAN-IRRAHIM", that is, invoking the name of God first in Arabic. The meaning of the picture-written phrase in Turkish changes slightly when we read the title as follows, particularly, with the use of the meaning of "one" (BIR) attributed to the first letter "A" that I described above:





1b) "BIR MEN AN-TUTANG HAK-AN USU"



(Bir Men Gök Tutan Hakan us u) meaning:



"Only I am the Sky-Holding Great-Wise-King" or

"Only I am the Sky-Ruling Great-King of Wisdom".



With this Turkish expression, the King again describes himself as the "US HAKAN" meaning "Wise Great King" or "Wise Supreme King". The Supreme King is also God. Thus the king deifies himself as the Sky-God, that is, the Ruler of the sky and earth. Clearly the ancient Turkish word HAKAN is embedded in its structure. It must be noted that this Turkish title has been dropped from the King's presented name "TUTANKHAMUN". The Turkish words in the 1b title expression are:



HAKAN meaning "Great King" or "Supreme King" or "King of Kings". In the word HAKAN, the following words are embedded:

HAK meaning God; right, just; righteous, justice, equity, law and order; truth, true. [5 (p. 435)].

AN meaning "sky". Thus, in one meaning HAKAN means "Sky-God", while in the other it is the title of the "Great King" or "King of Kings" of Turanians.

AK-HAN meaning "White Lord" (the personification of the "God of Goodness") who believes in the Sun, sunlight, day, daylight, positive enlightening, that is, knowledge, goodness, peace, law, order, social justice, upright behaviour, peaceful harmony with all, etc.. This is what the Turanian Tur, Turk / Oguz people believed in - probably ever since they conceived their Oguz religion. The opposite of this concept is the Turkish KARA-HAN meaning "Black Lord" (the personification of "God of Evil") who believes in black, darkness, nighttime, provocation, instigation, upheaval, destruction, the black moon, the wind, storm clouds, tornado, anything evil, war, ignorance, disturbing the peace among peoples, etc..

AHA-KUN (AGA GÜN) meaning "Lord Sun".

AHA KAN (AGA KAN) meaning "lord blood" or "noble blood".



Furthermore, the cartouche text also states in Turkish:



1c) "BIR MEN hAN-TUTANG HAKAN USU"

(Bir Men Köy Tutan Hakan Usu) meaning:



"Only I am the Palace and land-Holding Great-King of Wisdom" or

"Only I am the Palace and land-ruling Great-King of Wisdom".



HAN stands for "palace, country, land" and the text of the King's title in Turkish declares him as a Great King of Wisdom who rules his palace and the land.



Thus, with the expressions 1a), 1b) and 1c), this King of ancient Masar (Misir) declares himself as God, Supreme-Ruler and the Only-Lord who rules the sky and the land".



This title given to an ancient Masarian King during the years of 1334-1325 B.C. compares in almost exact manner with the titles of two Turkish Uighur Emperors named "IL-ETMISh BILGE BAYINÇUR (MOYUNÇUR) KAGAN" (746 - 759) and "IL-TUTMUSh ALP KÜLÜG BILGE KAGAN" (759 - 780), that is, some two thousand years later. See url: "HAN-TUTANG" and the more recent ones "IL-ETMIS" and "IL-TUTMUS" are one and the same in meaning. Similarly the words HAKAN and KAGAN are one and the same. Additionally, Turkish BILGE meaning "knowledged" and US meaning "wisdom" have the same meanings.



All of this is unquestionable evidence that the ancient Masarians were Turkish speaking Turanian Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples. Ancient historians, by falsely and deceptively altering the name of these ancient Turanians of the Nile valley into the name "Egyptian", have dishonestly wiped away their Turanian Turkic identity and assigned that magnificent civilization to "gypsies". Of course, this is not "history writing as it happened", but rather the act of "history stealing and history obliterating".

In this case the Turkish wordstands for "palace, country, land" and the text of the King's title in Turkish declares him as a Great King of Wisdom who rules his palace and the land.Thus, with the expressions 1a), 1b) and 1c), this King of ancient Masar (Misir) declares himself as God, Supreme-Ruler and the Only-Lord who rules the sky and the land".This title given to an ancient Masarian King during the years of 1334-1325 B.C. compares in almost exact manner with the titles of two Turkish Uighur Emperors named(746 - 759) and(759 - 780), that is, some two thousand years later. See url: http://sozumuz-turk-dovletler.blogspot.com/ It must be noted that they are almost word-by-word the same indicating that what was used as a king title in ancient Masar (Misir) was also used in the same way by the Central Asian Turks. The ancient Turkish expressionand the more recent onesandare one and the same in meaning. Similarly the wordsandare one and the same. Additionally, Turkishmeaning "knowledged" andmeaning "wisdom" have the same meanings.All of this is unquestionable evidence that the ancient Masarians were Turkish speaking Turanian Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples. Ancient historians, by falsely and deceptively altering the name of these ancient Turanians of the Nile valley into the name "Egyptian", have dishonestly wiped away their Turanian Turkic identity and assigned that magnificent civilization to "gypsies". Of course, this is not "history writing as it happened", but rather the act of "history stealing and history obliterating".



The book entitled, "TREASURES OF TUTANKAMUN" prepared by The Metropolitan Museum of Arts, [6 (p. 139)], gives the following as the meaning of this king's title. The author writes: "Like other Egyptian names Tutankamun has a meaning, although it is uncertain whether it should be translated "PERFECT IS THE LIFE OF AMUN" or "LIVING IMAGE OF AMUN". With this statement, the "Egyptologists" are telling us that they are almost sure the meaning of the cartouche is either the first translation or the second translation. But Polat Kaya says that the meaning of the cartouche text is neither of these! This quotation admits that "Egyptologists" are not sure of what the cartouche really means. Most likely, some people do know the real meaning of the cartouche - but prefer to be silent. They know that the missing part of the text contains the Turkish words HAKAN and US and both of these Turkish words fully apply to describe a King. If they were to mention these words in a translation or transliteration, some linguists would get suspicious about the implied "gypsy" identity of this King - and probably about the other Masarian Kings as well.



It is clear that my rendition of the meaning of this King's title and the meaning given by the writers of this book are totally different. Additionally, as I stated before, the name "TUTANKAMUN" is a partial reading of the full text and what is actually presented is a rearrangement. Hence, the two possible translated meanings given in the above reference source are not valid.





2. Second reading: Another Turkish expression is realized when the King Tutankhamun's title text is read as:



2a) "A-MEN-AN-T UT-ANKH HAQAN USU" where first pictorial symbol is read as "O":



"O MEN AN-Tu UT-hANG HAKAN USU " and/or

"O MEN AN-Tu UT-hANG HAKAN ISU " and/or

"O MEN AN-Tu UT-hANG HAKAN IȘU " , or in a composite form it reads:



(O MEN AN'DU OD-HAN HAKAN USU / ISU / IȘU )

(O Men Göy'dür OD-HAN Hakan Usu / ISI / IȘI ) meaning:



"That man of Sky is the Fire-Lord, the Great King of Wisdom / Heat / Light".





With this Turkish expression, the King's title describes the SUN, which was the Sun-God of the ancient Turanians, as AMEN (AMUN) of sky and the FIRE-LORD that is the Great King of Wisdom, Heat and Light. Thus, Sun (Turkish GÜN, GÜNEȘ), being secondary to the universal creator Sky-Father-God, is described as the energy source, that is, the Great King of heat and light.



Turkish words:

US, USU means "wisdom",

ISU (ISI) means "heat",

IȘU (IȘI) means "light".



Old Turkish term "UT-hANG (OT-HAN, OD HAN, GÜN HAN) describes the Sun-God (as also in Sumerian UTU, UT U) as The Fire Lord. The pictorial writing of the Turkish words UT (OT, OD) meaning "fire" and UT meaning "bull, ox" have been combined in the same word. In old Turkish "UT" also means "time". Of course the Sun has been used as a reference for time since the earth rotates around it . The Sun and its rays (light and heat) are the source of all these life-giving and wisdom-creating concepts on earth and in our solar system.

where first pictorial symbol is read as "O":and/or, or in a composite form it reads:meaning:



This very same expression in Turkish also declares the Sky-God with names such as "O MEN" (AMEN / AMUN) referring to the Sky-Father-God, "O-MA-EN" (O AY-HAN)) referring to the Moon-God and the OD-HAN (GÜN-HAN) referring to "Sun-God as "UT-HAN" (OKUZ-HAN)", that is, "The Bull Lord" of sky. This is done as follows:



2b) "A-MEN-AN-T UT-ANKH HAQAN USU" :





"O MEN AN'DU UT-HAN HAKAN USU"

(O Men Göydü UT-HAN Hakan Usu) meaning:

"That-Man of Sky is the Bull-Lord, the Great-King of wisdom".



In this expression, the Sun (Fire of Sky, Fire-Lord) and the Sky-God are both named as Bull-Lord of Sky.



The "fire of sky" and the "bull of sky" concepts come into the picture from the fact that in ancient Turkish UT (OD) means "fire" and also "UT" meant "bull, ox". This is similar to the other Turkish expression O-KÖZ meaning "that fire" referring to the "sun"; O-KÖZ (O-GÖZ) meaning "that eye" referring to the "sun and moon" and also to the "human eye"; OGUZ as the name of OGUZ KAGAN, that is, the "Sky-God"; and OKUZ meaning "bull" which refers to the trinity sky-god concept.. In the picture writing, the Turkish word AN means "sky" and also stands for HAN meaning "lord".





2c) "A-MEN-AN-T UT-ANKH HAQAN USU" :



"O Ma-EN AN'DU UT-HAN HAKAN USU"

(O AY-HAN Göydü UT-HAN (OKUZ-HAN) Hakan Usu) meaning:

"That Moon-Lord of Sky is the Bull-Lord, the Great-King of wisdom". Alternatively, we have:





"AMa-EN AN'DU UT-HAN HAKAN USU"

(KÖR-HAN (AY-HAN) Göydü UT-HAN (OKUZ-HAN) Hakan Usu) meaning:

"The Blind-Lord of Sky is the Bull-Lord, the Great-King of wisdom".





With these Turkish expressions the Moon is also included in the trinity concept of the ancient Turanian Sky-God concept. The Moon was regarded as the left and "blind-eye" ("sol kör göz" in Turkish) of the Sky-God. This was due to the fact that the brilliantly glowing Sun was regarded as the "FIRE-EYE", that is, "KOR GÖZ" in Turkish, while the softly shining Moon was regarded as "KÖR GÖZ", that is, "the BLIND-EYE" of the Sky-Father-God ("GÖY (GÖK) ATA-TANRI" in Turkish). The moon was also regarded as the "magician" because of the fact that it was changing its shape in time from a crescent moon, to halfmoon, to full-moon, and again to half-moon and then to "black-moon". In this context, this deity of the sky was a "magician" which has appealed to the gypsy sorcerers as inspiration for their continuing cabalistic "occult" work and the way of thinking. The black moon of the black night is the "black deity". With such morphing capability, the Moon-God was also regarded as a "wise king of the sky" or the "magician king of the sky", i.e., "Magi".



With these Turkish expressions, the title of the King TUTANKHAMUN first invokes and exalts the name of GOD, and then claims that he is all that is named in his title. The meaning of the picture-written title phrase in Turkish changes slightly when we read the title as follows, with the use of the meaning "one" (BIR) attributed to the first letter "A" that I described above:





3. Third reading: Another Turkish expression is realized when the King Tutankhamun's title text is read as:



3a) "A-MEN-AN-Tu UT-ANKH HAQAN USU" :



"I MEN AN'DU UT-HAN HAKAN USU / ISU / IȘU" , that is,

(Bir Mendü OD-HAN AN, Hakan usu / isi / ișu) meaning

"Only I am the Fire-Lord of Sky, the Great King of Wisdom / Heat / Light" or alternatively,



(MENDU O OD-HAN AN HAKAN USU / ISI / IȘU) meaning

"I am that Fire-Lord of Sky, the Great King of Wisdom / Heat / Light".



The Turkish expression can be viewed in two parts: 1) the king declares himself as the Sun-God, and 2) he describes the Sun-God as the Great King of wisdom, heat and light - which is a factual statement.





3b) "A-MEN-AN-T UT-ANKH HAQAN USU" :



(BIR MENDÜ UT-HAN AN, HAKAN USU / ISU / IȘU) , that is,

(Bir Mendü Okuz-Han Gök, Hakan usu / isi / ișu) meaning

"Only I am that Bull-Lord of Sky, the Great King of Wisdom / Heat / Light". Alternatively, we have:



(MENDU O UT-HAN AN, HAKAN USU, ISU, IȘU) meaning

"I am that Bull-Lord of Sky, the Great King of Wisdom / Heat / Light" which exalts him as the "Bull-God" OGUZ of sky.





Here, Turkish BIR means "one, only, alone",

MEN means "I" or "I am" - the personal pronoun for first person singular,

-Ti, -TÜ, -Di, -Dü is the suffix meaning "am, is",

UT (OD) meaning "fire", and also "bull",

AN meaning "sky",

AGA meaning "lord",

HAKAN meaning "Great King" or "King of Kings",

US means "wisdom, wise",

ISU (ISI) means "heat" and

IȘU (IȘI) means "light".



In all of these readings, the king's title first invokes the names of the Sky-God deities of ancient Turanians, and then states that he is all that his cartouche-phrase in Turkish describes.



What I have just revealed from the reading of the title of the ancient Masar (Misir) king so-called "TUTANKHAMUN" (TUTANKHAMEN) is very different indeed from the meaning that the "Egyptologists" have attributed to it, that is, "PERFECT IS THE LIFE OF AMUN" or "LIVING IMAGE OF AMUN". The difference is due to the fact that these "Egyptologists" either did not know what they were reading, or knew very well what they were reading, but did not want the world to know that the language of these ancient Masarians was Turkic. They were Turkish speaking TURANIAN Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples just like the Sumerians were Turkish speaking Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples. Their language was a dialect of Turkish. By misrepresenting these ancient king names of Masar, the "Egyptologists" obliterated the Turanian Tur/Turk/Oguz identity of ancient Masar. Thus they cut the roots of the present Tur/Turk peoples from that of the ancient Masar (Misir). Along with this, they Hellenized, Semitized and Romanized the ancient Masarian civilization and then claimed it all under the name "Egypt" (i.e., Gypsy). This amounts to the largest act of stealing in history.





THE SECOND CARTOUCHE of KING "TUTANKHAMEN":





King "TUTANKHAMUN" had another royal cartouche. Its hieroglyphic inscription is shown here at left.

The reading of this text is normally given as "KHEPERU-NEB-RA" [2 (p. 933 No. 305)] which is a reading that starts with the second symbol (beetle) having an assigned value of "KHEPERU ", then the semicircle at the bottom with an assigned value of "NEB" and ends with the sun symbol at the top with a name of "RA" .



In the text written in the cartouche we have the following symbols;



The first symbol is the SUN, in this case it is shown with a black dot, and is also an EYE symbol, that is, a circle normally with a central dot in it. The "Egyptologists" have taken this symbol as "RA" and attributed to it the meaning of "the sun-god". It has another form of "RE". However, since it is a symbol of the SUN, I also identify it as the Turko-Sumerian "UTU" (ODO) which was the Sumerian Sun God as well. Additionally, as an "EYE"symbol, I read it as Turkish "GÖZ". Thus this symbol has the phonetic values of UTU and GOZ/GUZ/KOZ all related to the Turkish name OGUZ. The same symbol is also used in the Etruscan writings. The Sun was regarded as the right eye of God (Horos) in ancient Masarian religion.



The second symbol is the Masarian sacred "beetle" symbol with the name "KHAPERU", [2 (p. cxx)]. The Latin name for this symbol is given as Latin "SCARABAEUS" and the scientific name for the beetle is given as "SCARABAEUS SACER". But this Latin name, when rearranged letter-by-letter as "SESAR-CARA-BUSEC-A", is the restructured, Romanized and disguised form of the Turkish expression "SICAR-KARA BÖCEK O" meaning "it is dung black beetle" which describes this beetle in Turkish. Turkish word KARA means "black", BÖCEK means "insect, beetle" and SICAR (SISAR) means "dung, excrement". So even the so-called "scientific name" of this beetle is made up from a Turkish expression describing the insect and it is not Latin or Greek as some groups falsely lead us to believe.



The third symbol, (three vertical lines side-by-side below the "beetle") has the meaning of "plurality". The ancient Turkish "plurality" suffix was "AN" (EN). Hence this symbol may be given a phonetic value of "AN" or "EN". AN also means "sky" as in the Sumerian name "ANU" (AN O, HAN O, GÖK O) meaning "the universal Sky God", or in another translation "It is SKY".





The fourth symbol (semicircle) has a phonetic value of "NEB". Thus when we put all of these phonetic values as given in the cartouche, we get the following text:





"UTU- KHAPERU-AN-NEB".



We are often told by Egyptologists that the ancient "Egyptians" worshipped the "dung beetle" - named " KHAPERU ". This is a misinterpretation and hence is misleading. The truth is that the ancient "Egyptians" did not worship the dung beetle. They regarded it sacred because its name ( KHAPERU ) represented one name of the Sky God (i.e.,Turkish AGA BIR O meaning "that One Lord"). With this understanding, my reading of this cartouche text in the agglutinative language of Turkish offers several relevant meanings that would have deified the Pharoah and defined his attributes. These meanings are as follows:



1. First reading:



1a) "U TU-AKHA-PER-U-AN-NEBi"

(O-TU AGA-BIR-O AN-NEBI) meaning



"He is the Lord Only-One the Sky-Prophet", or

("He is the Lord Only-One the Heavenly Messenger").



Turkish words:



U-TU (O DU) means "he is",

AKHA (AGA) means "Lord",

PER-U (BIR O) means "the only One" referring to God,

AN means "sky",

NEBI means "prophet, heavenly messenger".



In this first meaning of the text in the royal cartouche, the Sky-God is defined and His name is invoked as a result of reverence to the Sky-God.





1b) Second reading:



"UTU AKHA-PER-U AN-NEBi"

(ODO AGA-BIR-O AN-NEBI) meaning



"Sun is the Only-Lord Sky-Prophet", or

("Sun-God is the Lord Heavenly Messenger").



Furthermore, in the form of:



"UT-U AKHA-PER-U AN-NEBi"

(OT-U AGA-BIR-O AN-NEBI) meaning



"That Fire is the Only-Lord Sky-Prophet", or

("That Fire is the Lord Heavenly Messenger").



In these Turkish expressions the Sun God is being described in Turkish and it is identified as "fire", that is, the only heavenly messenger Lord. This is done by a slight change in the Turkish text of the first symbol. Note the change from U-TU meaning "he is" to "UTU" meaning "Sun-God RE/RA, to "UT-U" (OD O) meaning "that fire" or "it is fire" referring to the "Sun". Alternatively "UT-O" means "he is bull" or "that bull" or "he is time". All of these are only possible with the Turkish language.





1c) Third reading:



"U-TU AKHA PER-U hAN-NEBi"

(O-DU AGA BIR-O HAN-NEBI) meaning



"He is the Lord Peru, the Sky-Prophet", that is,

("He is the Lord Pharaoh, the Heavenly Messenger").



In this context, the Turkish text of the King's title also describes the King as "BIR-O" (PERU) meaning the ONLY-SKY-GOD. The name "PHAROAH" is a Semitized form of the title given to all the kings of ancient Masar/Misir. "PHAROAH" is the distorted form of this Turkish word "BIR-O" (PERU), that is, the name of the Ancient Turanian Sky-god who had many apellations. The "Pharoah" (PERU or BIRO) was regarded as the representative of God on earth. It was the tradition for the ancient Turanian kings to call themselves the representative of Sky-God (Gök Tanri) in Turkish.



These are the meanings of the pictorially written text in the second cartouche and they are my rendition of this ancient text.



As I noted above, this Turkish name "BIR-O" (PER-U, PERU) has been alienated from Turkish by Semitizing it into "PHARAOH". Most likely, this was done by the cabbalistic priests who had infiltrated ancient Masar's religious system.

The fourth symbol (semicircle) has a phonetic value of. Thus when we put all of these phonetic values as given in the cartouche, we get the following text:meaningorTurkish words:means "he is",means "Lord",means "the only One" referring to God,means "sky",means "prophet, heavenly messenger".

COMMENTARY:





1) In my 1a) reading of the first cartouche of TUTANKHAMEN, that is, "A MEN AN TUTANG HAKAN US U" , ther were the Turkish words HAKAN meaning "Great King" or "King of Kings" and US, USU, ISU (ISI) and IȘU (IȘI) in it but they are not present in the Egyptologists' rendition of the king's title - TUTANKHAMEN. It appears that these words, HAKAN and USU and its variations, have been intentionally suppressed. Thus the public does not know that these words ever existed in the cartouche. From the information presented by the Egyptologists, we do not get the full and truthful meanings of the title of the king "TUTANKHAMUN". While this king's title is totally in Turkish, the name TUTANKHAMUN is totally distanced from its Turkic identity and presented to the world as an alien name - as if it is from an "unknown language". Similar distortions are also true for the names of all the other kings of ancient MASAR (MISIR) which is artificially labelled as "EGYPT" meaning "Gypsy" representing the wanderer gypsies. The ancient Masarians were not "Gypsy" people. All this name alteration is very much like the suppression of the Turkic name TUR in the Sumerian texts and replacing it with "MAR". This way its Turkic identity has been obliterated by some cabbalistic readers of the ancient Masarian texts. In this regard, the following reference taken from a book by Raymonde de Ganse, named "TUTANKHAMEN", [ 7 (p. 47)]] states the following:



"The Verb was especially important. The Egyptians were probably a very talkative people. To name a thing or a person was to give it being and also, in a certain way, to dominate it. Egyptian mythology relates a curious adventure concerning the god Re. The goddess Isis offered to restore his failing health if he would reveal his "real name" to her. The aging god finally decided to disclose his name but by so doing he lost his power and Isis gained in authority. This is an illustration of the importance of the word. Inversely, to delete a name or obliterate an inscription, was to suppress the essence of a being, dead or alive."





This is exactly what I have been saying all along in my writings. I have explained that "WORD" (i.e., verb, speech, language), that is, Turkish "SÖZ" (DE, KONUS, GANIS, GUNES) is a most important means to give life to anything in our environment and also in our mind. Once we name something, it lives on unless someone suppresses it. In other words, the WORD gives life to something in terms of naming it and explaining it. Because the WORD is so powerful, it is considered a Godly thing - but the source for the generation of the WORD is the human head, that is, the brain. It is the brain that creates all the necessary thinking and the control commands that manupulate the mucsells of the "mouth" system to generate words, voice, language - all of which come out of the mouth which is AGUZ in Turkish. That is why ancient Turanians realized the importance of WORD, that is, SÖZ and DE and incorporated it in the Godly format of the OGUZ / AGUZ combination where OGUZ symbolizes the Sky-God and the human "eye" while AGUZ is the "mouth" which is the generator of the godly being "WORD". So "word" was important and it was not because of the ancient Masarians were "very talkative people" as the above reference implies. But the Turanian people of MASAR knew and realized the importance of human speech and hence incorporated that into their Turanian religion and social order.



In the reference given above, the story of Isis is a concoction in order to cover up a reality. The gypsies who infiltrated by the thousands into the ancient Turanians states, such as that of SUMER and MASAR (MISIR) and also others, particularly into the upper echelons of the so-called "priesthood", stole every aspect of the Masarian civilization including their religion and language. The Sun and Moon have been the two most prominent sky deities since ancient times. That is why the ancient Turanian religion was based on the trinity of a One Sky-Father-God having the Sun and the Moon as his eyes. The ISIS of ancient Masar was a mythological personification of the Moonlight and hence the Moon. This is also verified by the fact that the gypsy Greeks also concocted a mythological story called "IO" from Turkish language expression "AY O" meaning "it is Moon". IO and ISIS are two different names for the same concept which is the Moon in this case. The symbol of ISIS was a "throne" (a chair to sit on) which the Turkish word "OTUR" which identifies not only a "throne" but also the Moon as "O TUR". Thus, in the views of the ancients, Moon was also named by the Turkish word "TUR" for God.



Of course, in the mythological story, the real GOD was the ancient Turanians Sky-Father-God (GÖK ATA TANRI) and the SUN (GÜN TANRI) which are eternal. The Moon, when compared to the Sun, is negligible. The concocted ancient mythological story given in above reference relates that the aging god finally decided to disclose his name but by so doing he lost his power and Isis gained in authority, that is, in godship. In actuality this cabbalistic double talk states that the gypsy priests destroyed the ancient Turanian Sky-God OGUZ religion and in its place founded a cultic religion that put the "moon" as "god". Particularly the "black phase of the moon" is the source for their cultic concept. The reference to a so-called "aging god" implies the ancient Turanian trinity of the "SUN" (GÜN-TANRI), the MOON (AY TANRI) and the Sky-Father-God (GÖK-ATA TANRI). This old Turanian religion, which was most likely the only religion humanity ever practiced since men conceived the "GOD" concept, was replaced by a "Moon and Wind" based God concept designed by the wandering gypsies. In order to spread the new concept, the old Turanian concepts defined and described by Turkish words had to be destroyed; thus, Turkish names such as TANRI, TENGRI, TUR, OGUZ, GUN, AY, GUN-HAN, AY-HAN, GÖK-HAN, YILDIZ-HAN, DAG-HAN, DENIZ-HAN and many others were putdown and suppressed. Similarly, it is this obliterating effect of altering "word" (name, title) that has been used to disconnect this ancient MISIR (Masar) king named "Tutankhamen" from his Turanian roots.



New religions based on false concepts created endless friction between divided ancient peoples. The new religions introduced by the cabbalistic gypsy priests were designed to take advantage of people in many ways and also to control them. Because of the new religions, people were divided and used against one other. Thus the ancient Turanian civilization was intentionally obliterated and suppressed. In the process, most of the ancient Turanians lost their identity and became the confused peoples after having lost a magnificent civilization. What is left of the ancient Turanian Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples are presently also being subjected to all kinds of double-faced political pressures and further obliterations by the same religious organizations.





2) Raymonde de Ganse, [7 (p. 33)], also writes the following:



"Since the Theban Dynasty, in about 1200 B.C., had liberated Egypt from the hated Asiatic invaders, the Hyksos, the God of Thebes, Amun ("What is hidden"), had become virtual co-regent of all Egypt. And with him had come a veritable army of priests and ambitious and greedy officials who wielded substantial power while controlling incredible wealth. The situation was ripe for a stemming of the power of the priesthood and this was brought about, almost from one day to the next, by the efforts of a philosopher-king (often compared to Marcus Aurelius) who toppled the all powerful into illegality."



What this means is that what happened in Babylon was also happening in Masar (Misir). The cabbalistic gypsy priests had climbed to the top of the hierarchy and were ruling Masar together with the King of Masar. The "top" priest representing the Sky-God Amen (O men, Amun) was ruling ancient Masar. Thus the kings were taken under the control of priests under the guise of "godliness" and the wealth of the country were owned and controlled by an army of gypsy priests. The so-called "the hated Asiatic invaders, the Hyksos" were actually the OGUZ peoples who ruled ancient Masar, which was a Turanian state, for about 200 hundred years, that is, Dynasties XV and XVI, before they were expelled. Hyksos were particularly the "AVAR" Turks who also built the city called "AVARIS" in the delta area of the Nile. It is also said that it was the Hyksos who built the city presently called "Jerusalem", [8 (p. 9)]. Hyksos were OGUZ people as the name indicates so and were "okuz" (ox, catlle) owners, and for that reason, they were also called the "Shepherd Kings". The Hyksos being identified with the Israelites or the Arabs is a bogus attempt to take over and obliterate another Turanian Turkic title. They ruled ancient Masar about 200 years. The city of Jerusalem was not a Semitic city as falsely claimed. Its Arabic name "AL KUDS" and Turkish "KUDÜS" comes from The Turkish expression "KUT US" meaning "sacred wisdom" referring not only to the divine wisdom of God but also to the wisdom of the knowledged (bilgamesh, ermish, tanrilasmis) human head (i.e., the mind). The expression "AL KUD US" in Turkish makes the meaning of the city be "AL's Sacred Wisdom". "AL" (KIZIL) meaning "Red" and "Golden" was the name of the sky deities Sun, Moon and the universal Sky-God of ancient Turanians. That is why the "Dome of the Rock" mosque has a "Golden" dome on it.







3) Raymonde de Ganse, [7 (p. 47)] also writes the following:



" According to authorities, Egyptians were the originators of almost all the ancient practices of occultism, astrology or pure magic. It was from them that gitanos, romanies, and tziganes, great masters of sleight of hand, miracles and horoscpoes--derived their generic name of "gypsy"! The word "Amen,"so frequently used in Christian liturgy, is a cabbalistic word, originating from Egyptian; it has the magical value of ninety-nine, which shows the occult connivance between the Magus and the follower.





This reference clearly states that it was the wa nderer gitanos, romanies, and tziganes (that is, çingene, garaci, rum, jufut, gipti) who had infiltrated into the ancient Masarian state and carried on with their 'sleight-of-hand' affairs . It is interesting to note that the not-readily understood term "sleight-of-hand" has the readily understood meanings of "deception, deceit, trick, trickery, conjuring, magic, manipulation and hocus pocus". Similarly, the term "occult" means "hidden, esoteric, secret, shrouded, concealed". And the term "connivance" means "intrigue, conspiracy, trickery, plot, manipulation, all the other dirty work". In addition to these, one of the most prominent culture of gitanos, romanies, and tziganes known to the public at large is the view that they use sophistry and rhetoric to complete a planned thievery.



So these gypsy wandererers had a field day plotting the downfall of the ancient Turanian state of Masar within the protective hospitality of the Tur/Turk/Oguz peoples of that state. It is curious that this kind of activity by the gitanos, romanies, and tziganes took place also in ancient Babylon, Athens and Rome and other places against the native Turanians and their states. These gypsy "magic" operators were in ancient Masar / Misir, not that they wanted to give religous and spiritual guidance to the Masarian peoples who were the inventors of the religion and spirituality themselves, but rather they were there by the thousands to learn everything from the Masarians while they carryied out their underhanded operations designed to destroy that host civilzation which provided safe haven for them. It is no wonder that they were able to steal the Turkish language, religion and civilization, alter them, and then claim everything as their own without being suspected.



In fact the founders of the referred Christian liturgy (i.e., Christianity), similar to the founders of the Judeo liturgy, must have been nothing but the cabbalistic gitanos, romanies, and tziganes who had learned and usurped everything from the ancient Turanians. The term "AMEN" used so frequently in the Christian liturgy is in fact the Turkish expression "O MEN" meaning "That Man" referring to the Sky-God and "BIR MEN" meaning "Only Me" referring to man himself as I explaned earlier in this essay. In this essay I showed that very same Turkish word has been used in the title-text of the king "Tutankhamen".



4) Abouth word "CARTOUCHE" and Turkish name "TUGRA"







(a)











(b)











(c)

ANKH symbol and the second one, a tent-like symbol, has a phonetic value of "RDY", [3, (p. 168) ]. This word frequently appears at the bottom of the second royal cartouche of King "Tutankhamun", but below the cartouche. Many artifacts found in the tomb of King "Tutankhamun" are labeled with the king's cartouche (signature, seal) and these two symbols appears below the cartouche, frequently the one carrying the "beetle" symbol. For example see, [6 (color Plate 2, and p. 102)]



At the beginning of this essay I noted that the ANKH symbol has a subtle O-T content to its stylized shape. When we apply this phonetic value to the ANKH symbol, we get a word that is extremely relevant and meaningful inTurkish. The two pictorial symbols, with their phonetic values of "O-T" and "RDY" put together make the word "O-T-RDY" in consonants. This word reads in Turkish as "O TURADU" (O TUGRADU) meaning "it is the seal of the sovereign king". Indeed a king's "cartouche" is the name tag, seal, stamp of that king. Thus, this pictorial writing, "O-T-RDY", (read in Turkish as O TUGRADU) identifies the kings signature cartouche, that is, his royal seal.



Additionally in this pictorial writing we, also find the following Turkish expressions:



a) In "O-T-RDY" we find Turkish "O TURDU" meaning "He is TUR" or "he is TUR man".



b) In "O-T-RDY" we find Turkish "O TUR ADI" meaning "It is TUR name" indicating that the name in the cartouche is a TUR (TURK) name.

This symbol on the left, item (a), is a Masarian hieroglyphic word written with pictures. The first one is the so-calledsymbol and the second one, a tent-like symbol, has a phonetic value of, [3, (p. 168) ]. This word frequently appears at the bottom of the second royal cartouche of King "Tutankhamun", but below the cartouche. Many artifacts found in the tomb of King "Tutankhamun" are labeled with the king's cartouche (signature, seal) and these two symbols appears below the cartouche, frequently the one carrying the "beetle" symbol. For example see, [6 (color Plate 2, and p. 102)]At the beginning of this essay I noted that thesymbol has a subtlecontent to its stylized shape. When we apply this phonetic value to the ANKH symbol, we get a word that is extremely relevant and meaningful inTurkish. The two pictorial symbols, with their phonetic values ofandput together make the wordin consonants. This word reads in Turkish asmeaning "it is the seal of the sovereign king". Indeed a king's "cartouche" is the name tag, seal, stamp of that king. Thus, this pictorial writing,, (read in Turkish as) identifies the kings signature cartouche, that is, his royal seal.Additionally in this pictorial writing we, also find the following Turkish expressions:

c) In "O-T-RDY" we find Turkish "O-TÖREDI" meaning "it is the "law, order and tradition". Indeed when the TUGRA of a Sultan or Hakan is affixed under a document, it becomes the law and the order. In this context, it is clear that this was a Turanian tradition extending beyond thousands of years into the past. The Masarian Turs used "TUGRA" as a tradition of Turanians. All other Turkish empires, and finally the Ottoman Turs/Turks, carried on with the same traditions to present times.



In Turkish culture, "TUGRA" (TURA, TUGHRA) was the royal imperial seal of the Turkish Ottoman sultans and also all other Hakans. The Tughra, item (b) at left, is the seal of the Ottoman Sultan, The Sultan Süleyman the Magnificent.



For the definition of Tugra see url: http://www.tugra.org/en/hakkinda.asp



http://www.osmanli700.gen.tr/english/album/albumindex.html



The Tugra format shown under item (c) is again an Ottoman TUGRA which resembles the Turkish "tent". The white "tent" (çadir) was one of the most visible emblems of the Turkish army in their army field headquarters. It is amazing to see the similarity of this Ottoman Tugra and the "tent" symbol in the ancient Masarian "TUGHRA" hieroglyphic writing above.



For this earlier Ottoman tughra and also other tughras of Ottoman sultans, see url: http://www.google.ca/images?q=Ottoman+Tugras&hl=en&lr=&sa=X&sourceid=tipimg



See Sultan Mahmud I Tugra (Mahmoud meaning "I am Sun and Moon" or "I am Magnificent Sun" PK) at url: http://www.osmanli700.gen.tr/english/sultans/24tugra.html







I want to reveal here that this signature (1b) of the Ottoman sultans is actually much more than just a stylized signature. This TUGHRA of the great Ottoman sultan embodies an "EYE" symbol representing the Sun, that is, the "right eye" of the ancient trinity Sky-God. The vertically rising columns are called "TUG", meaning "standard", and also "TÜY", meaning "feather" - which the Ottoman Sultans wore on the forehead of their Turbans. "A feather in your hat" saying must have come from this royal Turanian concept. Even the word TURBAN, in the form of "TUR-BAN" (TUR BEN) means "I am TUR" which of course in one meaning is the name of the Sky-God TUR, and in the other, it says that "I am Tur/Türk/Oguz man". With this, the Ottoman Sultans deified themselves. One of the three "TUGS" is embraced and interwoven like a flame column with the other two. This supposedly, in Arabic means "ELIF" which is not only a symbol of "ONE" (BIR) representing all three "ONE"s, that is, the universal creator Sky-Father-God, the Sun-God and the Moon-God, each of which is SINGLE (i.e., one) with respect to earth in our solar system. Hence, the three "TUG"s represent the ancient Turanian trinity Gök-Ata-Tanri (Sky Father God), Gün-Tanri (Sun God) and Ay-Tanri (Moon God) - which has been usurped by Christianity into the FATHER, the SON and the Holy Ghost.



The two oval curves on the left of the Tughra, with a writing at the center, constitute the "EYE" symbol, and the whole signature is also a subtle representation of the "human head" which is a "creator" itself. The oval curves are said to be "egg" or "BEYZE" in Arabic. The word "BEYZE" is from Turkish "BEYEZ" (BEYAZ) meaning "white" which of course defines the "white" of the "eye" and similarly the white of an "egg". The center portion is the "iris" of the "eye" and also the "yellow" center of the "egg".



But most important, the Ottoman Tughra is a stylized signature in the form of a human head. That "head" represents not only the creative "human head" but also the creator Sky-Father-God (Gök Ata Tanru), the Sun (AL BASh or KIZIL BASh meaning "Red Head" or "Golden Head") and the Moon (ALA BASh meaning "Spotted Head"). The Tugra is very much a symbol of the religious concept that is embedded in the ancient Turanian "OGUZ / AGUZ / O-GÖZ" combination. I must mention here that in the picture at the top of this essay, (the mask of TUTANKHAMEN), the face, together with the headdress, symbolizes the Sun with its golden sunrays coming out - thus forming an "AL BASh" or "KIZIL BASh" meaning "RED HEAD" or "GOLDEN HEAD". The face, together with the headdress also symbolizes the Moon because the alternating gold and black rays form an "ALA" in Tukish meaning "Spotted" - which the Moon is. Furthermore, the beard on TUTANKHAMEN is an artificial beard which symbolizs "ONE" (BIR or TEK) referring to the "ONE"ness of the Creator God. Of course all three symbolisms form the ancient Turanian trinity.



Furthermore, the Ottoman Tughra is also a stylized "OD" writing just like the ancient Masarian ANKH symbol is a stylized OT. All of these are verifications of the fact that the ancient Masarian civilization continued in the Ottoman civilization - another Turanian Empire.



It can be said that with the royal TUGHRA, the Ottomans preserved the ancient Turanian Sky-God OGUZ religion with all the attributes of that ancient understanding of man and the universe by combining them into one esoteric symbol. That is why "man" is sacred for the Turks.





Before closing this essay and with the above given information, I would like to identify the so-called "English / French" word "CARTOUCHE" and also some other related words.



The term TUGHRA is defined as: In Ottoman history, 1. The Sultan's monogram; the imperial signature. 2. The illustration of imperial cypher", [9 (p. 1186)]. The Great Seal of the Ottoman Sultans, [10 (p. 1305)].



The term CARTOUCHE, when rearranged in the form of "COE-TUCHRA", is the restructured, Anglicized and disguised form of the Turkish expression "GÖY-TUGHRA" meaning "Celestial Signature of the Turkish Sultan", "Divine Signature of the Turkish Sultan". Thus, a "cartouche" of the ancient Masarian kings is a "seal" carrying the title of each king. When such a seal is affixed on a document it would become the "law" and the "word" of the king as was the case during the Ottoman Empire for the "TUGHRA" of the Ottoman Sultans. The term "GÖY TUGHRA" also embodies a) the name "GÖY-TURUK" (GÖK-TURK) meaning "Sky-Turk", and b) "TURG AHA" (TÜRK AGA) meaning "Turk Lord". Turkish Sultans were TUR/TURK/OGUZ LORDS. Similarly the "cartouches" of an ancient Masarian (Misir) kings also represented the names / signatures of "TUR/TURK/OGUZ LORDS" ruling his people in ancient Masar. So the TUGRA (TUGHRA) culture in these very old and recent Turanian States were one and the same.





Similar to the word "cartouche", there are the English words "signature" and "autograph" which mean the name of a person and particularly a design carrying the signature and name of a sovereign. "CARTOUCHE: An oval or oblong figure, especially one on an Egyptian monument containing the sovereign's name" [4 (p. 155)].





When the English word SIGNATURE is rearranged in the form of "TUGRASIN-E", we can see that it is the restructured, Anglicized and disguised form of the Turkish expression "TUGRASIN" meaning "you are signature" or "you are seal". Alternatively when SIGNATURE is rearranged as "SEN-TUGRAI", we can also see that it is the restructured, Anglicized and disguised form of the Turkish expression "SEN-TUGRA" meaning "you are signature" or "you are seal". There is no way that we should find the Turkish word TUGHRA inside the English word SIGNATURE unless the word SIGNATURE was manufactured from Turkish word TUGHRA together with some wrapping words. Evidently, that is what has taken place. A signature is the name of anyone written by the person himself in a stylized way that is peculiar to the person. Therefore a "signature" is a seal, a cartouch and an autograph of the person. But these concepts are all coming fom the Turkish and Turanian concept of "TUGRA".



The Greek version of the word is given as AUTOGRAPHOS, [11 (p. 446), 12 (p. 98)]. When AUTOGRAPHOS is rearranged in the form of "PASHO-TUGRA-O" or "PASH-TUGRA-OO", we can see that it is the restructured, Hellenized and disguised form of the Turkish expression "BASh TUGRA O" meaning "it is the Supreme Signature" or "It is the seal of the Sovereign". Turkish word BASh means "head, top" which refers always to the authorized head man, such as the Sultan or a Pasha, that is, a governor and/or a high ranking general of the Turkish Army. In this context, the Sultan (king) is the Supreme Ruler General of his countriy's army as was the case for all HAKANS of the past Turkish empires. Evidently the Hakans of the ancient Turanian Tur/Turk/Oguz Empire of ancient MASAR (MISIR), falsely so-called "EGYPT", were also the ruling heads of their country and army.



There is the Greek word AUTOKRATORIKOS meaning "imperial" [11 (p. 446)]. When this Greek word is rearranged letter-by-letter as "TURK-SOIA-TOKRA-O", we can see that it is the restructured, Hellenized and disguised form of the Turkish expression "TÜRK-SOYU-TOKRA-O" (TÜRK-SOYU-TUGRA-O) meaning "It is the Turkish Race Seal" or "It is the Seal of the Turkish Race" which again verifies that TUGRA (Imperial Seal) was Turkish and has been Turkish probably since a "State Organization" was ever instituted going back ten-thousand years and longer. The ancient Masarian king "cartouches" (Tugra) are unquestionable documented evidence written pictorially on stone, in Turkish, about the imperial nobility of the ancient Turanian civilization.



There is the Greek word AUTOKRATORIA meaning "empire" [11 (p. 446)]. When this Greek word is rearranged letter-by-letter as "TORK-AA-IURTA-O", where letter "I" is also a "Y", it can be seen that it is the restructured, Hellenized and disguised form of the Turkish expression "TURK-AGA-YURTU-O" meaning "It is the Turk Lord Country", that is, "It is the Turk Imperial Country". This again ties in the name Tur/Turk with the concept of "Empire", that is, a "Lord Country".



The Latin version of the word "autograph" is given as AUTOGRAPHUM [12 (p. 98)]. When this Latin word is rearranged in the form of "APA-TUGHROUM" or "APO-TUGHRAUM" we can see that it is the restructured, Romanized and disguised form of the Turkish expression "APA TUGRAYUM" meaning "I am Father stamp" or "I am the seal of Father" or "I am the top seal", thus referring to the signature of a high level person such as the Hakan and/or Sultan.



All of these shows that Turkish was the model Mother/Father world language from which the so-called "Greek" and "Latin" languages were manufactured. Turkish was usurped by the secret organizations of ancient Europe and the Middle East, and together with it, the accompanying Turanian civilization was stolen, altered and re-introduced deceptively as their own by the same groups. However, in so doing they also preserved the ancient Tur/Turk/Oguz traditions and civilization in the encrypted words of so-called "European" languages.



The English words "crypt", "cryptic, "crypto" all having the meanings related to "secret, hidden, covered, occult, mysterious" indicate the secretive nature of the "Indo-European" languages all of which have been restructured from the broken up Turkish words and phrases. Even the word "CRYPT" is from the Turkish word "KIRIPTI" meaning "he has broken it". It is no wonder that the Genesis 11 states: "Now all the earth continued to be of one language and of one set of words". That language was TURKISH before it was broken up into many "languages'. That fragmentation of the old language of Turkish was done by cabbalistic religious groups whose dishonesty has now surfaced to daylight after thousands of years.





It is no wonder that Will Durant writes in his book, under the title " Cradles of Civilization : Central Asia - Anau - Lines of Dispersion", [13 (p. 107-108)] :



"It is fitting that this chapter of unanswerable questions should end with the query, "Where did civilization begin?" - which is also unanswerable. If we may trust the geologists, who deal with prehistoric mists as airy as any metaphysics, the arid regions of Central Asia were once moist and temperate, nourished with great lakes and abundant streams. The recession of the last ice wave slowly dried up this area, until the rainfall was insufficient to support towns and states. City after city was abandoned as man fled west and east, north and south, in search of water; half buried in the desert lie ruined cities like Bactra, which must have held a teeming population within its twenty-two miles of circumference. As late as 1868, some 80,000 inhabitants of western Turkestan were forced to migrate because their district was being inundated by the moving sand. There are many who believe that these now dying regions saw the first substantial development of that vague complex of order and provision, manners and morals, comfort and culture, which constitutes civilization.



In 1907 Pumpelly unearthed at Anau, in southern Turkestan, pottery and other remains of a culture which he has ascribed to 9000 B.C., with a possible exaggeration of four thousand years. Here we find the cultivation of wheat, barley and millet, the use of copper, the domestication of animals, and the ornamentation of pottery in styles so coventionalized as to suggest an artistic background and tradition of many centuries. Apparently the culture of Turkestan was already very old in 5000 B.C. Perhaps it had historians who delved into its past in a vain search for the origins of civilization, and philosphers who eloquently mourned the degeneration of a dying race.



From this center, if we may imagine where we cannot know, a people driven by a rainless sky and betrayed by a desiccated earth migrated in three directions, bringing their arts and civilization with them. The arts, if not the race, reached eastward to China, Manchuria and North America; southward to northern India; westward to Elam, Sumeria, Egypt, even to Italy and Spain. At Susa, in ancient Elam (modern Persia), remains have been found so similar in type to those at Anau that the re-creative imagination is almost justified in presuming cultural communication between Susa and Anau at the dawn of civilization (ca. 4000 B.C.). A like kinship of early arts and products suggests a like relationship and continuity between prehistoric Mesapotamia and Egypt."







Will Durant also writes on page 116 of his above referenced book the following:



"The "Aryans " did not establish civilization – they took it from Babylonia and Egypt. Greece did not begin civilization - it inherited far more civilization than it began; it was the spoiled heir of three millenniums of arts and sciences brought to its cities from the near East by the fortunes of trade and war. In studying and honoring the Near East we shall be acknowledging a dept long due to the real founders of the European and American civilization."



The map below is from url http://www.rozanehmagazine.com/NoveDec05/AzarbayeganPart1.html. It is a version of a Turkish map showing the outward spreading of the Turanian peoples from their Central Asia homeland, [14 (p. 26)], as known to the Turkish historians. The above referenced description by Will Durant under the title of " Cradles of Civilization : Central Asia - Anau - Lines of Dispersion", clearly fits the Turanian migration, although he introduces some vagueness into it without mentioning the name Tur / Turk / Oguz. However, it is clear that he is describing in a occultic way that it was the Tur / Turk / Oguz peoples of Central Asia that gave civilization to the world.











Map of migration paths of Tur / Turk / Oguz peoples from Central Asia





CONCLUSION:



Ancient world history as presented to us is full of lies. The title of the so-called King "TUTANKHAMUN" of ancient Masar / Misir has not been read correctly. Even if it was read correctly, they did not report it to the public correctly. His title is composed in Turkish originally. It relates his views about the ancient Turanian Sky-God and also his own identity with respect to the God concept of his ancient Turanian religious tradition. In this essay, for the first time, I gave the true reading of the two cartouche texts, that is, the TUGHRA of the King. Others, by intentionally misreading it or mispresenting the title in a way that sounds non-Turkish, have intentionally obliterated the Turanian identity of this king and also other Masarian (Misir) kings as well. They have done a terrible injustice, not only to the Tur/Turk peoples, but also to world history. Furthermore, by changing the name of the longest living Turanian state into "Egypt" or "Egyptian", this most ancient and advanced Turanian civilization has been appropriated by the Gypsies - as if they were the founders and rulers of this ancient Turanian state. This was an act of stealing Turanian history, Turanian people and Turanian civilization by the wandering gitanos, romanies, and tziganes - great masters of sleight of hand .







REFERENCES:



1. "EGYPTIAN LANGUAGE" by Sir E. A. Wallis Budge, Dover Publications Inc., Fourteenth Impression, 1977, New York, p. 31.

2. Wallis Budge, "An Egyptian Hieroglyphic Dictionary", 1920, Dover Publications.

3. "The Handbook of EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPHS, Samuel A. B. Mercer, Revised and Expanded by Janice Kamrin, Hippocrene

Books, inc, New York, 1998.

4. Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, Fifth edition, 1947, Springfield, Mass., U.S.A.

5. Redhouse Turkish-English Dictionary, 1987, Istanbul.

6. "TREASURES OF TUTANKAMUN" prepared by The Metropolitan Museum of Arts, Ballantine Books, New York, 1976.

7. Raymonde de Ganse, "TUTANKHAMEN", Editions Ferni, Geneva, 1978.

8. Encyclopaedia Britannica, Vol. 12, 1963.

9. Redhouse Turkish -English Dictionary", 1987, Istanbul.

10. A. Vahid Moran, "Türkçe - Ingilizce Sözlük" (A Turkish - English Dictionary), Milli Egitim Bakanligi, Ankara, 1945.

11. Divry's Modern English-Greek and Greek - English Dictionary, , D. C. Divry, Inc, Publishers, New York, 1988.

12. Encyclopaedia Britannica World Language Dictionary, New York and Chicago, 1963.

13. Will Durant, "The Story of Civilization (PART ONE OUR ORIENTAL HERITAGE)", Simon and Schuster, New York, 1954.

14. "TURKEY 1987" by The General Directorate of the Press and Information of the Prime Ministry of the Republic of Turkey, Ankara, Turkey, 1987.







Best wishes to all,



Polat Kaya



10/10/2006

