Acitelli, L. K., Kenny, D. A., & Weiner, D. (2001). The importance of similarity and understanding of partners’ marital ideals to relationship satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 8(2), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2001.tb00034.x.

Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (1986). Love and the expansion of self: Understanding attraction and satisfaction. New York: Hemisphere Publishing Corp/Harper & Row Publishers.

Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Tudor, M., & Nelson, G. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.241.

Aube, J., & Koestner, R. (1995). Gender characteristics and relationship adjustment: Another look at similarity-complementarity hypotheses. Journal of Personality, 63(4), 879–904. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.ep9512221955.

Beall, A. T., & Schaller, M. (2014). Affective implications of the mating/parenting trade-off: Short-term mating motives and desirability as a short-term mate predict less intense tenderness responses to infants. Personality and Individual Differences, 68, 112–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.03.049.

Block, K., Croft, A., De Souza, L., & Schmader, T. (2019). Do people care if men don't care about caring? The asymmetry in support for changing gender roles. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 83, 112–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.03.013.

Block, K., Croft, A., & Schmader, T. (2018). Worth less?: Why men (and women) devalue care-oriented careers. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(1353). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01353.

Brown, E. R., & Diekman, A. B. (2010). What will I be? Exploring gender differences in near and distant possible selves. Sex Roles, 63, 568–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9827-x.

Buckels, E. E., Beall, A. T., Hofer, M. K., Lin, E. Y., Zhou, Z., & Schaller, M. (2015). Individual differences in activation of the parental care motivational system: Assessment, prediction, and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 497–514. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000023.

Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8483982.

Coltrane, S. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 1208–1233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01208.x.

Conroy-Beam, D., Buss, D. M., Pham, M. N., & Shackelford, T. K. (2015). How sexually dimorphic are human mate preferences? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 1082–1093. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215590987.

Croft, A., Schmader, T., & Block, K. (2015). An under-examined inequality: Cultural and psychological barriers to men’s engagement with communal roles. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 343–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314564789.

Croft, A., Schmader, T., & Block, K. (2019). Life in the balance: Are women’s possible selves constrained by men’s domestic involvement? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45, 808–823. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218797294.

Durante, K. M., Griskevicius, V., Simpson, J. a., Cantú, S. M., & Tybur, J. M. (2012). Sex ratio and women’s career choice: Does a scarcity of men lead women to choose briefcase over baby? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027949.

Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. New York: Psychology Press.

Eagly, A. (2013). Women as leaders: Leadership style versus leaders' values and attitudes. In R. Ely & A. Cuddy (Eds.), Gender and work: Challenging conventional wisdom (pp. 4–11). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Eagly, A. H., Eastwick, P. W., & Johannesen-Schmidt, M. (2009). Possible selves in marital roles: The impact of the anticipated division of labor on the mate preferences of women and men. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(4), 403–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208329696.

Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735–754. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.735.

Eastwick, P. W., Eagly, A. H., Glick, P., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., Fiske, S. T., Blum, A. M. B., … Volpato, C. (2006). Is traditional gender ideology associated with sex-typed mate preferences? A test in nine nations. Sex Roles, 54(9–10), 603–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9027-x.

Eastwick, P. W., & Finkel, E. J. (2008). Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(2), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.245.

Joel, S., MacDonald, G., & Plaks, J. E. (2013). Romantic relationships conceptualized as a judgment and decision-making domain. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 461–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413498892.

Kalmijn, M. (1994). Assortative mating by cultural and economic occupational status. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 422–452 Retrieved from https://pure.uvt.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/647947/jstor2.pdf.

Kalmijn, M. (1998). Intermarriage and homogamy: Causes, patterns, trends. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 395–421. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.395.

Kasser, T., & Sharma, Y. S. (1999). Reproductive freedom, educational equality, and females' preference for resource-acquisition characteristics in mates. Psychological Science, 10, 374–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00171.

Lakens, D., & Etz, A. J. (2017). Too true to be bad: When sets of studies with significant and nonsignificant findings are probably true. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 875–881. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617693058.

Larsen, K. S., & Long, E. (1988). Attitudes toward sex-roles: Traditional or egalitarian? Sex Roles, 19, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292459.

Li, N. P., Valentine, K. A., & Patel, L. (2011). Mate preferences in the US and Singapore: A cross-cultural test of the mate preference priority model. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 291–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.10.005.

Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954–969. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954.

Mare, R. D. (1991). Five decades of educational assortative mating. American Sociological Review, 56, 15–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095670.

Meeussen, L., Van Laar, C., & Verbruggen, M. (2018). Looking for a family man? Norms for men are toppling in heterosexual relationships. Sex Roles, 80(7–8), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0946-0.

Oyserman, D., & James, L. (2011). Possible identities. In S. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, & V. Vignoles (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 117–148). New York: Springer-Verlag.

Schimmack, U. (2012). The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles. Psychological Methods, 17, 551–566. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029487.

Simmons, J. (2014). Mturk vs. the lab: Either way we need big samples. Retrieved on July 2, 2015 from http://datacolada.org/2014/04/04/18-mturk-vs-the-lab-either-way-we-need-bigsamples/.

Tidwell, N. D., Eastwick, P. W., & Finkel, E. J. (2013). Perceived, not actual, similarity predicts initial attraction in a live romantic context: Evidence from the speed-dating paradigm. Personal Relationships, 20, 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2012.01405.x.