Article content continued

As a share of overall goods exports, these energy categories have been up to 25 per cent of Canada’s total exports — a staggeringly large dependency if you think about it.

Another way to come at the data is to say that from 2004-2016 oil and gas alone (not including coal) accounted for over $1 trillion worth of exports.

Although some economists rightly lament that Canada is too reliant on its resource exports and a handful of manufacturing industries, common sense tells us that the solution to this problem isn’t to shut them down, as so many activists want us to do. We need the revenues too much, and if we don’t have them it’s not possible to pay for the things we need.

And what things do we need? Here are a couple of examples:

Since 2006, our annual need for imported medicine and blood/immunity products has grown to over $11 billion a year. In the same period, the consumption of mobile phones and personal computers has grown more than fourfold, also to about $11 billion annually.

That’s $22 billion a year in total. Where can we find the spare money for this? From exports, of course. The only alternative is to put it on the national credit card (so to speak). Mercifully few of us are silly enough to think that’s a good idea.

With the dominant role played by energy exports, there is a clear connection between them and these essential imported goods that can make the difference between life and death for millions of Canadians.

What if we decided to heed those who say it’s time to stop exporting oil, gas and coal? Could we shrink our export economy by one quarter or more? The fossil-fuel opponents say its simple: All you need to do is “build sustainable businesses” and pursue “new forms of community investment” and “innovations in food systems” that are “more inclusive.”