Okay first off, I don’t have to agree with any of your points. I don’t have to disagree with them either. I am, in fact, not obligated to do anything in regards to any elements of your positions aside from those I wish to discuss.

I really do feel like this is a very important point to make here. You do not automatically win an argument by default just because you stated a position someone else did not respond to. ESPECIALLY as it has absolutely NOTHING to do with my point.

Which really is even more of a point of order. My specific, STATED position is that I have an issue with the terms used, the context of those terms, and the metatcontext of those who use said terms. Which I expanded upon from there, in that the entire concept is BASED in a form of theory I disagree with, and which essentially is, in my view, the CAUSE of the problem they now argue that should be solved in their chosen way.

And more than that, that you INSIST That I ignore the context of terms, the theories behind the terms, the fact that those theories are behind the author’s theories, which is a truth so blatant that I can’t believe you’re arguing that I should not care why someone who terms this issue the ‘Mother Wound’ uses the term ‘Patriarchy’ as their definition for societal standards.

Seriously. Stop mansplaining feminism to me, you dingus. Especially as you’re working so incredibly hard to both fail to address my stated position while claiming you won the argument I never made.