Ready to fight back? Sign up for Take Action Now and get three actions in your inbox every week. You will receive occasional promotional offers for programs that support The Nation’s journalism. You can read our Privacy Policy here. Sign up for Take Action Now and get three actions in your inbox every week.

Thank you for signing up. For more from The Nation, check out our latest issue

Subscribe now for as little as $2 a month!

Support Progressive Journalism The Nation is reader supported: Chip in $10 or more to help us continue to write about the issues that matter. The Nation is reader supported: Chip in $10 or more to help us continue to write about the issues that matter.

Fight Back! Sign up for Take Action Now and we’ll send you three meaningful actions you can take each week. You will receive occasional promotional offers for programs that support The Nation’s journalism. You can read our Privacy Policy here. Sign up for Take Action Now and we’ll send you three meaningful actions you can take each week.

Thank you for signing up. For more from The Nation, check out our latest issue

Travel With The Nation Be the first to hear about Nation Travels destinations, and explore the world with kindred spirits. Be the first to hear about Nation Travels destinations, and explore the world with kindred spirits.

Sign up for our Wine Club today. Did you know you can support The Nation by drinking wine?

On April 18, 1971, nearly 1,000 Vietnam veterans and Gold Star parents descended on Washington, DC, for a six-day protest codenamed “Operation Dewey Canyon III.” The first two Dewey Canyons were secret military offensives into Laos, but for the third, hundreds of people camped on the National Mall in what they called a “limited incursion into the country of Congress.” Events included marching, singing, and guerrilla theater led by the cast of the Broadway musical Hair. Ad Policy

Some veterans headed to the Pentagon to try to turn themselves in as war criminals, while others threw their military medals and battle ribbons onto the steps of the Capitol. Veterans also stormed the Hill with a list of 16 demands, including “immediate legislation to provide proper care and service for all veterans in V.A. hospitals; to make available job training and placement for every returning veteran; and to provide the funds and means necessary for their educational and vocational endeavors.”

If these muscular calls for progressive reform had been issued by anyone other than a rowdy cadre of battle-weary veterans, lawmakers might have scoffed. But the following year Congress passed 14 laws strengthening veteran benefits. They expanded health care and student-assistance eligibility, extended certain VA benefits to widowers, and established life-insurance policies for the severely disabled.

Since the country’s founding, veterans have succeeded in securing promises from the US government. Revolutionary War veterans received the first public pensions in 1818, and veterans’ benefits have accrued slowly but surely ever since. Spearheaded by membership-based veterans’ organizations like the American Legion, the Veterans of Foreign Wars, and Vietnam Veterans of America, grass-roots advocacy and agitation won many of these advances. In 1977, when lawmakers sought to consign the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee to subcommittee status, veterans’ groups organized a phone-in that jammed the Capitol Hill switchboard. Over the years, many lawmakers have made it a point of personal pride to establish or expand veterans’ programs that alleviate hardship or provide opportunities in education, employment, and small-business development. Related Article Is This Hedge-Fund Titan Greasing the Levers for Privatizing the Veterans Health Administration? Jasper Craven and Suzanne Gordon

As result, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has become a model for progressive ideas in action. Today veterans of all socioeconomic backgrounds are provided comprehensive and high-quality care for free or at low cost. The agency negotiates fair drug prices with pharmaceutical companies; over the last five years, it has cut opioid-prescription rates by 41 percent; and the VA is a national leader in assuring the safety and health of its employees. Physicians for a National Health Program, a universal health-care advocacy group, has pointed to the VA as “ another reason for single payer.”

Veterans overwhelmingly approve of the care they receive in the VA. Dominick Tao, a retired US Army Officer, wrote in The Atlantic that while he first viewed government health care as “oppressive” and “a limit on my freedom,” his experience with the VA taught him “the opposite was true.”

“While any type of universal health-care system would have economic consequences, the associated gains—no longer worrying about coverage loss after a job change, for example, or feeling stressed about finding in-network doctors—for me [these] outweigh that burden,” Tao wrote. Current Issue View our current issue

Yet as an invigorated left looks to propose and implement new ideas, few point to the VA as evidence of effective socialist policy. Instead, liberals have ceded rhetorical ground to corporate and right-wing actors hell-bent on destroying the most progressive agency in government. Moreover, once-powerful membership-based veterans organizations are facing diminishing finances and influence, and now must compete against well-heeled corporate and ideological lobbies. In this environment, services have been eroded , and the VA could soon be privatized altogether.

Kristofer Goldsmith, the associate director for policy and government affairs at the Vietnam Veterans of America, noted that as privatization efforts have ramped up: “Suddenly there’s a profit motive for healthcare-related companies and their lobbyists to swoop in try to get a piece of the pie.” Not surprisingly, veterans’ advocates have sometimes struggled to counter the influence of such entrenched interests.

“It’s always going to be an unfair fight. It’s veterans fighting for quality health care versus faceless corporations fighting for dollars,” Goldsmith said.

Since the 2003 invasion of Iraq, congressional budgeting for veteran support has not kept up with the millions of new veterans returning home. Today there are nearly 50,000 staff vacancies and an outdated technological and physical infrastructure that inhibits care and services. In 2010, Congress even slashed VA’s clinical-care budget for its most disabled veterans.

These austerity measures have led to lapses in the quality of care. The most publicized instance came in 2014, when dramatic evidence emerged that showed administrators at a Phoenix VA hospital tampering with scheduling data, leaving some veterans waiting months for an appointment.

House Republicans seized on the Phoenix crisis. They packaged, framed, and fed it to media outlets desperate for an Obama-era scandal. Meanwhile, Concerned Veterans for America (CVA), a fledgling project of the Koch brothers, revved into action, testifying before Congress, holding press conferences, and making major ad buys. Pete Hegseth, CVA’s former executive director, called the struggles in Phoenix evidence of “ socialized medicine at its worst.”

An unholy trinity of corporate lobbyists, CVA staffers, and Republican lawmakers quickly pushed privatization measures in Congress as public anger remained high. Almost immediately, Democrats caved. Even Senator Bernie Sanders supported the resulting law, the VA Choice Act, which sent $10 billion and thousands of veterans into the private health-care industry. This emergency legislation committed just $6 billion to the VA itself, not enough to fix the underlying problems that had caused long waits in Phoenix.

During the five years since the Choice Act was passed, CVA’s influence has only grown. Today, CVA lobbies Congress, organizes on the ground, runs ads against candidates opposed to their “reform” agenda, and uses surrogates to spread its message through the media. Last year the organization’s recently launched CVA Foundation produced a full-length documentary called “The Care They’ve Earned” on problems with the VA, which has been screened in Arizona, Wisconsin, Ohio, and other states. Related Articles At the VA, a Law Meant to Discipline Executives is Being Used to Fire Low-Level Workers Jasper Craven How the Failure of Our Foreign Wars Fueled Nativist Fanaticism Greg Grandin The Fight to End South Korea’s ‘Blood-Stained’ National-Security Act Max S. Kim

These efforts have been complemented by right-wing think tanks like the Heritage Foundation, who have applied the same sorts of entitlement-shaming tactics on veterans that have long characterized their attacks on food-stamp and Medicare recipients.

Health-care interests have also continued to lobby hard on veterans’ issues, and they have ramped up their donations to relevant lawmakers. During the 2012 election cycle, the last before the Choice Act was passed, health-care interests donated a combined $4.3 million to members of the House and Senate Veterans Affairs Committees, according to data from the Center for Responsive Politics. During the 2018 cycle, donations from health-care interests to these committee members more than doubled, to nearly $10 million. In recent years, large health-care companies, including Emory Healthcare, Anthem, and United Health Group, have also set up subsidiary networks aimed exclusively at enticing veteran patients to sign up for private insurance.

Trump’s presidency has seen conservatives double down on its depiction of the VA as wracked by corruption and dangerous for veterans. Hegseth, now a Fox & Friends regular, is a phone buddy of the president while Jeff Miller, the House Republican who co-wrote VA Choice, was seriously considered for the role of VA secretary. (Miller is now a lobbyist for corporate interests looking to cash in on VA privatization efforts.)

Trump has signed more than a dozen bills aimed at veterans. His first, The VA Accountability and Whistleblower Protection Act, gutted civil-service protections for low-level VA employees and enabled a firing spree that continues to this day. Trump’s most recent accomplishment—The VA Mission Act—is set to make permanent the privatizing principles set forth in the Choice Act. Depending on how final eligibility rules are written, the Mission Act could send millions of new veterans into the private sector. Proponents of Mission argue veterans are better and more quickly served by strong partnerships with the private sector, yet virtually all veterans’ advocates point to a voluminous body of research rating VA care as better than the private sector. Moreover, private hospitals are unprepared to treat the often complex health needs of veterans, many of whom struggle with combat-related injuries like post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injury, and sicknesses tied to chemical weapons like Agent Orange.

Democrats, by and large, have not opposed these new proposals. Trump’s VA accountability legislation was backed by a strong bipartisan coalition, and only two of the 42 members of the House and Senate Veterans Affairs Committee opposed the VA Mission act when it came up for a vote. One headline after Mission passed read: “ Democrats join Koch group to revamp veterans programs.”

While Sanders voted for the Choice Act, he voted against Mission. In a statement, the Vermont senator expressed his “fear” that Mission would “open the door to the draining, year after year, of much needed resources from the VA.” While Mission attracted the support of traditional veterans’ advocates, largely due to an expansion of caregiver benefits, many now fear that Trump will exploit its statutes to drastically increase privatization. The Veterans of Foreign Wars recently testified that it had “serious concerns about the lack of collaboration and working communication from VA with [veterans organizations] to establish [Mission’s] regulations.”

The Koch brothers–funded CVA has launched a campaign in support of Mission’s draft rules, and it has staked out an ambitious agenda for 2019 that includes instituting “cost controls for the VA budget.” Right now they face little pushback from the left.

While the Democratic Socialists of America has a veterans’ working group, they haven’t chimed in on VA issues in any substantive way. One member active in the DSA group said it served more as “supportive community for veterans than a place to execute advocacy campaigns.”

Organized labor has pushed back against efforts to defund the agency, but few lawmakers have backed them up. Sanders has quietly introduced legislation to enhance VA services, yet his bills have attracted few co-sponsors. The party’s progressive superstar, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, hasn’t spotlighted the good work of the VA beyond an occasional tweet. Massachusetts Democratic Representative Seth Moulton, a Marine veteran and Bronze Star recipient who may run for president in 2020, recently told The Atlantic that while he receives care through the VA’s single-payer system, he “ doesn’t think that’s the answer.”

A number of younger, progressive veterans’ advocates are working to connect and train veterans in political organizing and advocacy, including Goldsmith’s High Ground Veterans and Common Defense, which is lobbying on veterans’ issues in Congress. Traditional veterans’ organizations also remain influential in Washington, yet many count Trump supporters among their members and must tread lightly in opposing his platform.

“Traditional veterans’ advocates are used to a world where veterans’ issues are apolitical, but that is no longer the world we live in,” said Alex McCoy, a co-founder of Common Defense. “We must now call out the villains, stand up to the few greedy billionaires who are trying to destroy the system. Until you name the problem, and get at what’s going wrong, you aren’t going to motivate regular people to take time out of their busy day and fight back.”

Nearly 40 years after the Dewey Canyon demonstrations, Vietnam veterans are still advocating for themselves, even if they don’t have the same influence. On a recent evening inside Community Church of New York, more than 20 members of the New York City chapter of Veterans for Peace (VFP) discussed how they could protect their care and push back on Mission’s statutes that will push people into private care.

Skip Delano, a Vietnam war veteran running VFP’s “ Save our VA” campaign, said veterans advocates in Washington “haven’t done anything” to defend the agency, and that his efforts at collaboration with other veterans groups have largely been rejected. He expressed a deep frustration with lawmakers, but said hoped concerted action could spur results.

“Things are far along in this privatization effort,” Delano told the gathered veterans. “It doesn’t mean we can’t act, but it means we have to get our act together.”