An uncomfortable discussion that knocks on the walls of a safe space can be frightening to some people. But, that person cowering in their safe space can also be a bully.

- Women: Women that I have spoken to are not offended by Trump, he is an equal opportunity offender.

- Transgender: Being the odd people person that I am, I asked a transgender person their thoughts on the subject and its periphery matters. She thinks it is a state issue. She is voting for Trump.

- Islamophobia: The Obama administration has forcibly removed ‘Islamic Terrorism’ and ‘Radical Islam’ from our vernacular. We have lost very important qualitative and quantitative measures that can distinguish the ‘good’ from the ‘bad’. Without this evaluation how can we win a war on terror? Or, maybe that’s the point? Trump calling for a temporary ban on entry for Muslim immigration was an opening bid to a discussion. I know many Muslims very enthusiastically voting for Trump.

Refugee crisis and economic (illegal) immigration

Trump didn’t create the wars in South America or provoke American intervention in those countries. He didn’t draft, advocate or sign NAFTA, CAFTA, which caused massive economic disruption. He is unmolested by the legacy of those issues. This gives him, and us, a chance to sincerely discuss very real issues.

- Refugee settlement requires a coherent and articulated American strategy, not Bono financial exploitation.

- (Illegal) Immigration is labour arbitrage and has taxpayer subsidies and other implications to schooling and social services requirements. This requires funding, and a consistent, fair and legal framework. I know many recent immigrants and people of Latino descent that are voting for Trump.

Supreme Court

Both parties use this contrivance to lure straying voters and attach them to a cause. I don’t see any certainty that one side, left-wing or right, will produce a different outcome than any other. We are fortunate to have a very durable foundation.

- The ‘liberal’ justices sided with Justice Roberts in Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project — an ominous case instance of rights being taken away.

- You might enjoy reading about this case, Mcdonnell v United States.

Dodd-Frank and Banks that are too big

- From the applause the Democrats gave themselves a person might think that Dodd Frank was useful legislation, it wasn’t. It didn’t solve any problems and managed to create new ones.

- If you want to read a scary short story, this letter from the Fed to Jamie Dimon, Chairman of JP Morgan Chase — potential threat to “the financial stability of the United States.” (page 11)

- Banks have to be ‘broken up’ and Trump is the only candidate who can take away their candy. David Stockman, cofounder of Blackstone, wrote this great piece, please read: The Case For A Super Glass-Steagall

Trump foreign policy