“White” appears three times in this article as if it were the natural opposite of “Muslim,” reflecting the British media’s universal tendency to see the jihad threat in racial terms: Muslims are a different race, and those who oppose jihad terror are vehemently suspected of “racism.” The possibility that there could be white Muslims who wear burqas or commit acts of jihad terror doesn’t ever seem to enter into their considerations.

“He was saying that Muslim women shouldn’t be allowed to wear the niqab and he had his head filled with nonsense that Muslims were trying to take over the country.”

The fact that there are some Muslims who are trying to take over the U.K. is obvious: the now-imprisoned Anjem Choudary was quite open about it. Do British authorities really think that now there are no longer any such people in Britain? And there are mainstream voices saying that face veils should be banned in the West, including Angela Merkel. Would British authorities put Merkel into a deradicalization program? Will they ban her from entering the country?

What exactly do British officials believe they are accomplishing by harassing this schoolboy? What do they think will be the outcome of this kind of action? The obvious result will be that people in Britain will be afraid to speak out against the Sharia oppression of women and the Islamic supremacist imperative to “fight until religion is all for Allah” (Qur’an 8:39), for fear of being prosecuted for doing so. And thus Sharia impression of women and the Islamic supremacist imperative will be able to advance in Britain unopposed and unimpeded.

Is that what British authorities want?

“Schoolboy put on anti-terror scheme for saying Muslims shouldn’t be allowed to wear burka,” by Rebecca Perring, Express, January 5, 2017: