MUMBAI: In a bid to secure Peter Mukerjea 's bail in the Sheena Bora murder case , his counsel said on Tuesday it was the CBI's own case that the former media baron 's wife Indrani misled him and 10 others on how Sheena had broken up with Rahul Mukerjea and gone off with someone else. “If she could fool Peter, how could he be in on the alleged murder conspiracy?“ asked advocate Aabad Ponda.Ponda's arguments before Justice N W Sambre of the Bombay high court centred on raising enough questions on the CBI case that Peter was party to the murder conspiracy. He added that Peter was paying the price for being a “hen-pecked“ husband.The CBI chargesheet itself contains statements of nine independent witnesses saying Peter was never against a relationship between Sheena and Rahul, Indrani's daughter from an earlier liaison and his son from his first marriage. Ponda claimed that the agency later made the case that both Indrani and Peter were against the relationship.He read out the CBI chargesheet filed last November which never mentioned Peter and said Indrani had planned and executed Sheena's murder as she was against the relationship. She feared Vidhi, her daughter from an earlier marriage but taken under his wings by Peter, would lose her inheritance since Peter loved his son.Ponda stressed that the CBI was trying to link calls between Indrani in India and Peter in UK just before, during and after the murder and their duration and timings to his culpability without knowing its contents. When he had pointed out in the sessions court how the conversations were not on record, the CBI “for the first time'' produced an additional statement by co-accused-turned-approver Shyamvar Rai - Indrani's driver - to suggest that Indrani had in one call from Khalapur informed Peter of a “good place'' ostensibly to dump Sheena's body . “This is an improvement, just to deny Peter bail,'' he argued.In a related development, Justice Revati Mohite-Dere adjourned to November 17 another petition by Peter, challenging the sessions court's refusal to hand him a copy of a sealed statement of witness number 11.In the sessions court, arguments for framing of charges got deferred, but the judicial custody of Peter, Indrani and her second husband Sanjiv Khanna was extended by two weeks.