I saw some trolls on Weibo posting this comparison chart of BTC and BCH (Bitcoin Cash) development activity. I can't help but laugh. If I didn’t guess wrong, these guys must mistake the project on Github ： https://github.com/zquestz/bitcoincash as the core codebase of BCH.

If they takes a glance at the code, they can find that most of the files are js, html and css files -- these are all technologies used in website development. LOL! Is BCH implemented through a web browser? People with normal IQ know that this is impossible. You can see such a sentence in the project's readme file: This is the repository for bitcoincash.org.

Do you get it now? This is the codebase of the website bitcoincash.org. It is not the code of BCH itself. The website is ready and online. So it does not need to be updated every day. There are only two possibilities for people who describe the website code as the BCH core code:

1. He is stupid.

2. He deliberately distorted the facts.

"BCH is already a ghost town. Look at the comparison of their github activity"

It can be understood that the core pinko mistook the website code as BCH code because development of BTC is a highly centralized . There is only one team - Blockstream employees as the core development team, so there is only one codebase. The core pinko must take it for granted that BCH is the same, but they are wrong. BCH is a highly decentralized digital currency . If you visit https://www.bitcoincash.org/ , you will find 5 development teams:





Bitcoin ABC

Bitcoin Unlimited

BitcoinXT

Parity

Bitprim

In addition, I know that there is also Bitmain's Copernicus project using go language to implement BCH client. And Purse released a BCH client BCash based on javascript. These development teams are independent of each other, both competitive and cooperative. They are all contributing to BCH. I'm afraid this is not understandable by those core pinko who are full of imperial thoughts.

So, is the development activity of BCH high or not? Let's find out the truth.

The BCH client developed by the Bitcoin ABC team is the largest client in the BCH nodes, accounting for 60.8%. Therefore, we take the ABC team as an example to observe the activity of BCH. It should be noted that the code of ABC team is not on GitHub but on its own software development platform: https://reviews.bitcoinabc.org/

Here you can see the history of each submission, you can see yesterday (2018-07-17), there were 3 ABC developer with 8 times submission of code,

Then let's take a look at the BTC team:

We can see that there was only one submission of code yesterday.

Then let's take a look at the code submissions of the BTC and ABC teams last week (2018-07-08 to 2018-07-14) (I will not post the chart, just write the results directly):





ABC team: 22 submissions

BTC team: 18 submissions

BTC submitted 4 records less than ABC.

Don't forget that it’s just one of BCH's development teams. If you add other teams, it definitely far exceeds the BTC team.

Through the comparison above, it can be seen that core pinko said that the inactive development of BCH is completely untenable. No bottom line, and very poor rumors.It can only make people of BCH camp laugh.

By the way, look at the trolls below:

"Are BCH developers having summer vacation?"

"BCH is a joke"

My aim is not to prove that BCH is more active than BTC because of the number of times the BCE code commits. Developers know that the number of submissions does not necessarily reflect the activity of a project. Maybe some people like to develop locally first and implement a large piece of complete function code before submitting to the remote codebase. But some people like to change something to submit. From the number of submissions, the latter may be much higher than the former. But the amount of code is not necessarily more than the former, and code quality is not necessarily higher than the former.

The purpose of my writing is to expose the ugly face of BTC pinko. On the other hand, to let the newcomers know the truth, which is the bitcoin that meets Satoshi Nakamoto's original vision.

In addition, I heard that the Bitcoin ABC development team often spends a lot of time deleting the junk code left by the BTC team.