A popular 9/11 video series published on YouTube outlining the many 9/11 "coincidences" featuring snack-size clips from various 9/11 documentaries.. .

by NuffRespect, who writes:

"I am just someone who has looked at the facts and I am merely relaying those facts to you. I ask you to go and check out for yourself everything said in my videos to confirm for yourself that what I say is true. Please note that I am not a "conspiracy nut", a "leftie", a "rightie", a "liberal", a "jew", a "muslim", a "disinformation agent", or any other label that debunkers try to pin on me. I am just a human who happens to be born in the UK, and who is seeking the truth and nothing more. I love people from every race, creed, colour and nationality. I believe in Almighty God but I have no time for religions or political parties. All I want is truth, freedom and peace. Whatever your point of view, I hope that you find these videos thought-provoking and entertaining."

1. Three Burning Buildings - One Result How much more evidence do we need before the government and mainstream media finally talks about this issue? By ignoring this issue, the government and media are just insulting our intelligence. 9/11 witnesses - who include fire crew, police officers and media reporters - heard and saw explosions going off inside the towers, long before they actually fell. Many witnesses reported powerful explosions in the basements of the buildings long before they collapsed. Plus, controlled demolition experts agree that the collapses of the three buildings bear all of the hallmarks of a controlled demolition. For example, we see demolition "squibs" shooting out of the windows of the buildings before they started to collapse. All three buildings collapsed at near freefall speed. Building 7, which wasn't hit by a plane and contained only small scattered fires, came down symmetrically in just 6-seconds. And 6-weeks after 9/11, liquified steel was found under the rubble of all three buildings and the temperature was still in excess of 1500F. Jet-fuel simply cannot burn hot enough to reach that sort of temperature. And many of the steel beams found in the rubble of the three buildings were cut diagonally - in exactly the same way as shaped-charges slice through steel diagonally to bring a building straight down. Sulfur residue was also found on the steel beams. Sulfur used with thermite is called thermate -- which produces even faster results than thermite, reaching temperatures of over 4,000F. We also see red-hot molten steel dripping from the windows of the towers prior to their collapse. We really need to wake up to the facts and ask questions. If we don't, what does that say about us? If you haven't yet heard about this subject, please go to Google and find out about the melting point of steel, and about the maximum temperature that jet-fuel can reach, and about the use of thermate shaped-charges in controlled demolitions. Once you know these facts, you'll realise that those three buildings simply could NOT have collapsed in the way they did UNLESS they were brought down in a controlled demolition. 2. All At Freefall Speed

3. Bombs in the Buildings Bombs, explosions, secondary explosions, explosive devices....how many more times do we need to hear these words being said by 9/11 witnesses before we start asking questions about what really happened on that awful day? 4. 1,000 Cameras and No Airplane! I am not saying that the Pentagon wasn't hit by a plane on 9/11, however we have every right to be suspicious when we look at the facts. My gut feeling is that the Pentagon WAS hit by a plane, but I find it hard to believe that the plane was the Flight 77 Boeing 757 jet. The Pentagon is the most guarded building on the planet, with countless CCTV cameras covering every part of the building both inside and out. Plus there are many establishments in the immediate area, such as gas stations, hotels, etc, that have CCTV cameras. Yet the US government refuses to release any images or video that actually shows a plane approaching the Pentagon on 9/11, let alone a Boeing 757. Within minutes of the crash, the FBI confiscated CCTV footage from all of the establishments in the immediate area, and they refuse to show us any of that footage. The only images they have released were only released after years of demands under the Freedom of Information Act, and none of those images show an actual airplane. If a Boeing 757 really did hit the Pentagon then why not show us the footage? And what about the lack of any wreckage from a Boeing 757, and the lack of bodies, and the fact that the damage to the Pentagon wall is not consistent with what you'd expect if it had been hit by a Boeing 757 -- the hole is way too small for a start. And if the alleged terrorists had wanted to wreak maximum damage, then why would they fly the plane into the only part of the Pentagon that had recently been re-inforced, and the only part of the Pentagon that housed the accountants who were looking into the disappearance of over a trillion dollars from the US economy? And in any case, the flight instructor of the alleged hijackers said that these people were useless at flying even the smallest aircraft, and yet we're expected to believe that they carried out an extremely difficult 360 degree menouvre and managed to fly the Boeing just a few feet from the ground as it approached the Pentagon. Whichever way you want to look at it, this just doesn't quite add up, it's like trying to put a square peg into a round hole.



5. PNAC: "A New Pearl Harbor" In 2,000, just before the republicans got back into the White House, a project set up by the neo-cons who now surround George W Bush, laid out its agenda for global domination in a document called the "Project for the New American Century". However, it stated that gaining public support for its aspirations would require a long process, UNLESS there was a catastrophic event like "a new Pearl Harbor". Its published aims have, alarmingly, come true. If a group of people made a public statement saying that having a new Pearl Harbor would be the only way the public would support their agenda, and these same people were in positions that would allow them to conduct, permit or enable such an event when that event actually took place...would they deserve your suspicion? Well this is EXACTLY what happened. The very people with established motives for conducting an event like the one that took place on 9/11/2001 were responsible for national security when we had that most unlikely, unrealistic and implausible complete catastrophic failure of every single defense procedure in operation. Yet Americans look to these people for protection now. The US military was running as many as 15 defense drills that day. Some of these drills were live fly hijacking simulations. Some of the drills were practicing for the possibility of having planes fly into government buildings. Could it be that someone decided that these drills would go live! Why have the corporate news media refused to report the drills to the public? Could it be because you would start asking REAL questions about that day? Well, it's time that you start asking questions because you may just be supporting the real terrorists! 6. "ABLE DANGER" Terror Drills on 9/11 On the morning of September 11 2001, the US Defence Agencies had been running pre-planned simulations of terrorist attacks involving crashing planes into the WTC and Pentagon. The Bush administration described the event as "a bizarre coincidence". The matter was not mentioned by the media. True to form for false-flag terror attacks, it seems that these Military Drills were used as cover for the attack. Webster Tarpley lays out a very convincing case that military drills were used as cover and pretext for the attacks of 9/11. Using drills, our own military resources were directed, in supposed practice attacks, which were 'flipped live' by moles working within the government. Using such drills, most of the fighter air cover of the US was redirected to Alaska and Canada. Other drills were used to inject dozens of false 'blips' onto FAA radar screens. Still other drills, ones using 'live fly' hijacked aircraft, were apparently 'flipped live' and the planes crashed into the towers under remote control. The 'hijackers' are mere patsies, DOD controlled "red team" actors. The supposed 'hijackers' are essentially actors trained by the military and CIA to play the part of the "red team" in simulated terrorist drills. The now famous "Able Danger" program was most likely one half, the red half, of a hijack drill the other half being "Able Warrior."

7. WTC7 Implosion Please visit the website to order the full version of 9/11 Mysteries: http://www.911mysteries.com Everyone remembers the Twin Towers exploding at 9:59AM and 10:28AM EDT on September 11, 2001. Comparatively few people can recall that there was a third massive skyscraper, also a part of the World Trade Center, which fell very rapidly to the ground on that day. This was World Trade Center Building 7. One reason that few remember WTC Building 7's collapse is that after September 11th it has been treated, both in the media and in The 9/11 Commission Report, as if it didn't happen. The total collapse of the third huge skyscraper late in the afternoon September 11th was reported as if it were an insignificant footnote... most people never saw video of Building 7's collapse... Incredibly, it is virtually impossible to find any mention of Building 7 in newspapers, magazines, or broadcast media reports after September 11th." The Commission avoids another embarrassing problem -- explaining how WTC 7 could have collapsed, also virtually at free-fall speed -- by simply not mentioning the collapse of this building. The collapse of Building 7 at 5:20PM EDT was in itself a major event; the sudden and unexplained fall to earth of a 47-story steel-framed skyscraper is certainly news. Why has there been almost no mention of this in the US media, and why was there no mention of Building 7's collapse in The 9/11 Commission Report? These are questions of great significance, and they cry out for answers. To be able to approach any kind of explanation, however, first some pertinent and verified facts of the Building 7 aspect of 9/11 need to be scrutinized. The fires in WTC 7 were very few and small, and certainly not evenly distributed, so a perfect collapse was impossible, yet it came down in perfect symmetry in just 6 seconds. WTC leaseholder Larry Silverstein said to the fire department commander "the smartest thing to do is pull it." Firefighters withdrawing from the area stated the building was going to "blow up". The roof of WTC 7 visibly crumbled and the building collapsed perfectly into its footprint. Molten steel and partially evaporated steel members were found in the debris. There can be only one conclusion as to what happened to WTC 7 - it was demolished. Silverstein Properties made billions from the insurance policies he set up on the WTC complex just a few weeks before 9/11. He specifically took out insurance policies to cover terrorist attacks, then a few weeks later 9/11 happened. What are the odds on that?

8. Thermite Reaction

9/11 Coincidences (Part Eight) UPDATE Part Eight was removed by YouTube for no apparent reason. However you can still watch the video at the following web locations:

9. Mysterious Power-Downs in the World Trade Center

Please visit the website to order the full version of 9/11 Mysteries: http://www.911mysteries.com Did the World Trade Center towers undergo a deliberate "power-down" on the weekend prior to the 9-11 terrorist attacks? According to Scott Forbes, a senior database administrator for Fiduciary Trust, Inc. -- a high-net investment bank which was later acquired by Franklin Templeton -- this is precisely what took place. Forbes, who was hired by Fiduciary in 1999 and is now stationed at a U.K. branch office, was working on the weekend of September 8-9, 2001, and said that his company was given three weeks advance notice that New York's Port Authority would take out power in the South Tower from the 48th floor up. The reason: the Port Authority was performing a cabling upgrade to increase the WTC's computer bandwidth. However, there seems to be no logical reason why the electricity need be shut down in order to upgrade computer bandwidth. The Fiduciary Trust was one of the WTC's first occupants after it was erected, and a "power-down" had never been initiated prior to this occasion. Forbes also stated that his company put forth a huge investment in time and resources to take down their computer systems due to the deliberate power outage. This process, Forbes recalled, began early Saturday morning (September 8th) and continued until mid-Sunday afternoon (September 9th) -- approximately 30 hours. As a result of having its electricity cut, the WTC's security cameras were rendered inoperative, as were its I.D. systems, and elevators to the upper floors. Forbes states that there were plenty of engineers going in-and-out of the WTC who had free access throughout the building due to its security system being knocked out. Even though these disclosures could jeopardize his current employment, Forbes has stepped forward because, "I have mailed this information to many people, including the 9/11 Commission, but no one seems to be registering these facts." 10. The 9/11 Commission: See No Evil, Hear No Evil, Speak No Evil!

The Kean Commission (9/11 Commission) was created only after 14 months of pressure from September 11 victims' families, who for their efforts at first got the failed nomination by George Bush of Henry Kissinger as chairman. He declined, but the Commission consisted of appointees with obvious conflicts of interest, and was seriously underfunded ($14 million as opposed to the $67 million devoted to investigating Clinton's stray member or $30 million for the space shuttle disaster). Its work was met with resistance from the White House. Bush met with the Commission only on the condition that he be questioned in the Oval Office, jointly with Cheney, and off the record. The 9/11 Commission Report was noteworthy in the fact that it didn't blame anyone for 9/11. Not one person has lost his job because 9/11 happened; even though high-ranking witness after high-ranking witness to the Commission described blunders and missed opportunities leading up the attacks. Why did the Commission do that? Many of the 9/11 widows are unhappy with the findings and many people have called it a whitewash. Despite the vast quantity of labor behind it, the 9/11 Commission Report is a cheat and a fraud. It stands as a series of evasive maneuvers that infantilize the audience, transform candor into iniquity, and conceal realities that demand immediate inspection and confrontation. Because it is continuously engaged in scotching all attempts to distinguish better from worse leadership responses, the Commission can't discharge its duty to educate the audience about the habits of mind and temperament essential in those chosen to discharge command responsibility during crises. It can't tell the truth about what was done and not done, thought and not thought, at crucial turning points. The Commissioners' immeasurably valuable access to the principals involved offered an extraordinary opportunity to amass material precious to future historians: commentary based on moment-to-moment reaction to major events. But the 567 pages, which purport to provide definitive interpretations of the reactions, are in fact useless to historians, because a seeming terror of bias transforms query after commissarial query--and silence after silence--into suggested new lines of self-justification for the interviewees. In the course of blaming everybody a little, the Commission blames nobody--blurs the reasons for the actions and hesitations of successive administrations, masks choices that, fearlessly defined, might actually have vitalized our public political discourse. The 9/11 Commission was a blatant whitewash, it failed to seriously examine virtually every fact supporting complicity of the US administration. It ignored the PNAC document, the links between the CIA and Bin Laden, the links between the Bush family and Bin Laden, the links beween the CIA and Mohammed Atta, the terror drill exercises that were taking place in the week of 9/11, the collapse of building 7, the molten steel found under the rubble of towers 1, 2 and 7, the evidence of the use of thermite and sulfur, the witness reports of repeated explosions throughout the towers, the lack of flying skills previously displayed by the alleged hijackers, Silverstein's $7 billion insurance payout, the insider trading before 9/11, the mysterious powerdowns and evacuations at the WTC prior to 9/11, and the fact that the Bin Laden family were allowed to leave the US just after 9/11 while every US citizen was grounded. The list just goes on and on and on. It is up to us, the people, to get some answers. Please write to your congressman to demand a proper INDEPENDENT investigation into 9/11.

11. Who Benefited From 9/11?



When a crime has been committed, any good investigator will ask the question -- Who benefits? In this 9/11 Coincidences installment, we apply this same reasoning to the main parties associated with the events of 9/11. I had to shorten this video in order to upload it to YouTube, so I edited lots of bits out. The full video is 30 mins long and goes into more detail on each of the parties spoken about. 11. UPDATE - CENSORED BY YOUTUBE



9/11 Coincidences (Part Eleven) was removed by YouTube for no apparent reason, they didn't even send me an email to explain why. However you can watch the video at the following web locations: 12. Guilty Demeanor This video takes a look at the guilty demeanor displayed by George W Bush, Donald Rumsfeld and others with regard to the events of 9/11. If you were the president of the United States, and an attack on the scale of 9/11 took place on your watch, wouldn't you immediately do everything you could to ensure that there was a thorough investigation into what happened? Wouldn't you make sure that the investigation was started up straight away, and that it was headed by independent people who left no stone unturned? Wouldn't you make sure that the investigation was given all the funding it needed? We know that the Bush administration did everything in its power to derail an open inquiry into 9/11. Then, when faced with its inevitability, the president and his aides sought to limit its scope, its access, and its funding. In addition, the odd behaviour displayed by the White House with regard to 9/11, would surely make them prime suspects on anyone's list.

13. The BUSH-LADEN Connection

George Bush Sr. and bin Laden Sr. are long-standing business partners. George Bush Sr. and the bin Laden family are on the board of the Carlyle Group, a large defense contractor. The bin Laden family financed George Bush Jr.'s early failed businesses. From their generous contributions, even though the companies failed, George was still able to live high on the hog. According to the book Fortunate Son bin Laden money, invested via James Bath, enabled George Dubya to get hooked on cocaine. He was busted in 1972 but got off with community service at Project P.U.L.L. - a project for troubled youth. In 1995, his father arranged to have the record purged and his son to get a new drivers' license number. James R. Bath, friend and neighbor of George W. Bush, was used as a cash funnel from Osama bin Laden's rich father, Sheikh bin Laden, to set George W. Bush up in business, according to reputable sources from the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times. The connection between GW Bush, the bin Laden family, and the Bank Commerce Credit International (BCCI) is well documented. The Bush dynasty has closer links to the bin Ladens than just about anyone else. George Bush Jr. arranged for the bin Laden family to escape the USA by private jet when everyone else was still under lockdown. The bin Laden family were asked no questions. Pakistan's Secret Police (ISI), which has close ties to the CIA, secretly airlifted several thousand members of Al Qaeda, and, perhaps Osama, out of Afghanistan to safety shortly after 9/11. If it were you or me with this many links to the alleged perpetrators of 9/11, we'd be rotting in Guantánamo Bay's Camp Delta in shackles and chains. If it were Clinton, he'd be lynched. But because it is BUSH, people pretend not to notice. I think before too much more money is wasted chasing phantom terrorists, it would be wise to interrogate Bush under oath to find out just what he knows. He seems to be on intimate terms with the reputed perpetrators. 14. The BUSH-LADEN Connection (continued)

There is a long and tangled history between the Bush family and the elite of Saudi Arabia, including the bin Laden family. It begins in the 1970's in Houston, Texas, when George W. Bush was just starting out in his family's two businesses of politics and oil. The powerful - and very rich - bin Laden family helped fund his first venture into oil. The cozy friendship continued for decades. After a terrorist attack at a barracks in Saudi Arabia which killed 19 Americans, the bin Laden family received a multi-billion dollar contract to re-build. And incredibly, George Bush Sr. was in a business meeting at the Ritz Carlton Hotel in Washington on the morning of September 11th with one of Osama bin Laden's brothers. While serving as governor of Texas, George W. Bush met with high-level Al Qaeda leaders, hoping to get support to build a pipeline across Afghanistan. Four months into his presidency, he rewarded the Taliban by handing over $43 million in May 2001, only four months before the 9/11 terrorist attacks. All airlines in the United States were grounded for two days after 9/11. Yet, on September 13, 2001, the White House authorized six Saudi jets to fly bin Laden family members from America to Saudi Arabia. The members of the bin Laden family were never questioned by United States authorities. Judicial Watch called for George Herbert Bush to resign from the Carlyle Group, when it became known that Osama bin Laden was a major investor in the firm. (Judicial Watch, March 5, 2001) After the September 11 terrorist attacks, Judicial Watch Chairman and General Counsel Larry Klayman said, "This conflict of interest has now turned into a scandal. The idea of President George W Bush's father, an ex-president himself, doing business with a company under investigation by the FBI in the terror attacks of September 11 is horrible. President Bush should not ask, but demand, that his father pull out of the Carlyle Group." (Judicial Watch, September 28, 2001