Shaking up the IDE

Recently at Digital Asset we open sourced our programming language DAML, but I'm not going to talk about that today. Nestled inside its compiler is the Haskell IDE Core. I'm going to explain what that project is in this blog post.

You might ask, what is some part of a Haskell IDE doing inside of DAML? DAML is built on a tweaked version of the GHC API using GHC Lib. Rather than writing our own parser, type checker etc we piggyback off the fine work done for GHC.

The differences between DAML and Haskell are generally found in tweaks to parse trees, custom backends and interesting ways of interpreting the compiler output. These steps are written in various languages and take a non-trivial amount of time to run. The best way of wrangling long running computations written in different languages is to use a build system. Build systems are normally optimized for batch jobs, but with some tweaks Shake can be made to run in real time.

So what does a build rule look like in IDE Engine? It's just a shake rule, except instead of indexing by file type we index using types + filepaths. Here's how you parse a file.

getParsedModuleRule :: Rules () getParsedModuleRule = define $ \ GetParsedModule file -> do contents <- use_ GetFileContents file packageState <- use_ GhcSession "" opt <- getOpts liftIO $ parseModule opt packageState file contents

The LSP bindings populate the buffer contents into the shake graph and if your rules depend directly or transitively on them they will be rerun on the buffer change. define creates a rule and use_ or uses_ either runs the rule or pulls a pre-computed value from the cache. parseModule is a pure(ish) function which does the heavy lifting of parsing the text.

typeCheckRule :: Rules () typeCheckRule = define $ \ TypeCheck file -> do pm <- use_ GetParsedModule file deps <- use_ GetDependencies file tms <- uses_ TypeCheck deps setPriority PriorityTypeCheck liftIO $ typecheckModule pm tms

Type checking is much slower than parsing so we attach a lower priority to this rule to keep the IDE responsive. There's a little hand waving in these examples, but it shows how you can pull the information you need out of shake and build a dependency graph pretty easily.

Shake takes care of all the heavy lifting such as caching/garbage collection. Each rule outputs a tuple of the RuleResult and FileDiagnostics . FileDiagnostics are a Language Server Protocol (LSP) data construct, put simply it generates the squiggly lines and messages indicating errors, hints or warnings in your code. Shake sends and invalidates these results when appropriate.

type instance RuleResult GetParsedModule = ParsedModule type instance RuleResult TypeCheck = TcModuleResult

Once you've written your rules wire them together in your mainRule then run that rule in the shake database.

mainRule :: Rules () mainRule = do getParsedModuleRule getLocatedImportsRule getDependencyInformationRule reportImportCyclesRule getDependenciesRule typeCheckRule getSpanInfoRule generateCoreRule loadGhcSession getHieFileRule

IDE Core allows a far more à la carte approach to putting together your IDE. You only have to add the rules that make sense for your setup and the low barrier to entry will hopefully foster an ecosystem of rules for the multitude of haskell setups and tools.

It's not ready for primetime at the moment, currently it's a little light on IDE features and can only get dependencies with a specially crafted .ghci file. I'm running a project with Neil Mitchell at Zurihac this weekend for anyone who feels like getting involved and contributing some IDE rules.

The hope is that we can add this to Haskell IDE Engine as a dependency to simplify the architecture and as an improvement on the existing plugin architecture.