freetrader said: You should support whatever you find best. No argument with that.



But let me tell you the differences between Linus Torvalds and Craig Wright.

Linus Torvalds *created* Linux.

Linus Torvalds *maintained* Linux.

Linus Torvalds has the technical chops and acumen to lead a hugely successful *open source* project.



Which is why I have huge respect for Linus Torvalds.





The issue with CSW is not having a "terrible character".

If that were the problem, I would be in 70% of agreement with you because a lot of people who produce great technology have shitty character.



But it goes far beyond that in his case. The fact that you people cannot acknowledge it is not "bad politics", it is also something far more tragic.

[doublepost=1567623765,1567622580][/doublepost]

Dude yourself.

A hedge fund enabled nChain, nChain enabled Craig.

Craig keeps saying he owns nothing, he is an employee there.



So call it "his company" if you wish, I'll simply call it "his employer".



If you agree with his technical vision, then by all means support that. Click to expand...

Strange, you folks seem to think you can stir up infighting within the BCH community all day.

You're not fooling anyone. Click to expand...

I already know why you all widely agree.

It's the same reason everyone who disagreed with Theymos got kicked out of BTC's little club, and the modus operandi is exactly the same for BSV.



Disagreements in BCH do exist, and are sometimes public, that's true. But that's still a way healthier sign than a community in which disagreement with Dear Leader is taboo. Click to expand...

Yes, I do, as almost everybody in bsv. I'm sure there will be some infighting in the future, I hope it will, but once the protocol is locked, it will be healthy.I don't care if csw is an employer or an emoyee. Thought about such things too. If there is a shady company behind, they invest a lot of money in something I like.no need to stir up anything. We folks just sit outside and watch with some amusement happening what was poised to happen.You don't understand. Bch sticked together because there was the bad aussie man and because they got support from the wider ecosystem, mostly exchanges. Bsv sticked together because they share a big block vision, which was abandoned by bch.Maybe it's not so black and white. There are people in bsv which are there only for our Satoshi. They might face a bad awakening, and csw is a black swan event, which can crash many things.There is also the legit big block vision of bitcoin unlimited, developing the protocol instead of freezing it, enabling new opcodes, solving scaling with technical tricks instead of economics. It's OK, but I'm rather in the 'let bitcoin just grow in its own way and let it play out' camp. Maybe I am wrong, who knows, but for me, like for almost every single one in bsv, it feels like having finally reached what i always wanted.