A new excerpt from Hatchin's book reveals she encountered one of Klatos' strange pursuers.









Could Klatos disappearance have been less nefarious than is currently assumed?

Samantha Hatchins, in what appears to be a deliberate effort to clear her fallen friend's name, alleges that she encountered two strange men approximately 2 weeks before his disappearance in April of 2015. In her own words:





A man, who I didn't like the look of, walked up to me between classes. He said his name was Chuck, and his larger friend was 'pinhead.'

He asked me if I had a boyfriend named Klatos.

I said no. They told me they would find out if I lied to them, so It'd 'be best not give us the runaround.' When I went out to a diner afterward, I noticed they were looking at me from the drug store window, across the street.

I told Klatos. He told me if something happened to him, I would know why.”





This matches with the earlier description Klatos gave to her. In an earlier excerpt, in which he referred to a gentleman and his larger accomplice, he recalls one of the suited men referring to himself as Joe.

This would certainly make Klatos disappearance more noble, in that he was fleeing to draw attention away from his loved ones.





Still... why was HE drawing attention at all?





These men, as ominous as they are, clearly possess some basic commitment to skill in surveillance. So if these alleged individuals do in fact exist, they're clearly of some higher authority. Then one has to wonder why higher authorities would be monitoring a high school student;

were his activities of exceptionally suspect behavior?

Could Klatos disappearance be less nefarious than is currently assumed...

Because higher authorities doubt it.