



That legislation, dumped on an almost-straight party line vote, was one of many Democratic-sponsored measures to die in the Republican-controlled Senate in 2006 and part of a whopping three-quarters of Democratic initiatives squashed over the two years of the 109th Congress.



An analysis of all Senate roll call votes in 2006, shows that, true to the form they established the previous year, the GOP killed most legislation proposed by Senate Democrats. In all, Democrats were able to scrape together a handful of Republican votes to pass just 28 pieces of legislation in all of 2006.



There were



Add the 70 percent kill-rate of the Democratic measures defeated in 2006 with the greater number Of all the nauseating tactics used by the Republican party in the 2006, midterm election campaign, one of the more galling was their continued insistence that Democrats had "no plan" for national security. To provide cover for that bogus claim, the Senate's GOP leadership made damn sure that, on September 13, 2006, they killed 528 pages of a national-security blueprint, proposed by Democrats, called the Real Security Act of 2006 -- and then went around for the next six weeks saying the Democrats had no plan.That legislation, dumped on an almost-straight party line vote, was one of many Democratic-sponsored measures to die in the Republican-controlled Senate in 2006 and part of a whopping three-quarters of Democratic initiatives squashed over the two years of the 109th Congress.An analysis of all Senate roll call votes in 2006, shows that, true to the form they established the previous year, the GOP killed most legislation proposed by Senate Democrats. In all, Democrats were able to scrape together a handful of Republican votes to pass just 28 pieces of legislation in all of 2006.There were 279 roll call votes in the second half of the 109th Congress -- January through December of this year -- and 104 votes involved measures sponsored by Democrats. Of those, 73, or 70 percent, had a negative outcome, meaning that they were rejected in an up-or-down vote or tabled/killed by the GOP majority. (And this is with a generous interpretation that gives Republicans "credit" for allowing benign, crowd-pleasers to pass, such as a Barbara Boxer amendment to punish parents who have committed incest and a measure by Barack Obama for Katrina relief, which both passed by unanimous votes. )Add the 70 percent kill-rate of the Democratic measures defeated in 2006 with the greater number beaten back by Republicans in 2005 and the GOP ends the 109th Congress having shot down 207 of 283

pieces

of Democratic-sponsored legislation -- or 73 percent.



There are two things that jump out when one considers the votes of the last Senate… One is that it was indeed as partisan as it appeared to those of us observing it each and every day and the deck was at all times stacked against Democrats and any legislation they tried to move forward. This was brought into specific relief when I averaged the roll call votes on all 73 times in 2006 that Democratic legislation was killed and the average numeric vote in those instances was 46-53 -- amazingly close to the exact split of 44 Democrats and 55 Republicans in the 2004-2006 Senate.



How's that for a look at what results a Democratic Senator should have reasonably expected, no matter what legislation they brought to the floor?



The other startling thing that becomes obvious when analyzing the votes, is the sheer number of bills related to national security or helping America's Veterans that were voted down by the Republicans -- with no substitute measures of their own -- simply because the ideas came from the other side of the aisle.



Here's some examples of Democratic legislation that was killed by the Senate GOP majority in 2006:



Senator Daniel Akaka (D-HI) proposed S.Amdt. 3007 to "increase Veterans medical services funding by $1.5 billion in FY 2007 to be paid for by closing corporate tax loopholes." It was voted down 46-54 with every Republican but Lincoln Chafee (R-RI) voting against it.

S.Amdt. 3141 , was proposed by Senator Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) to provide for Veterans benefits that steadily increased over time to account for both inflation and the large number of troops returning from Iraq and Afghanistan. Stabenow's bill was rejected 46-54 -- probably because she stipulated that it be "paid for by restoring the pre-2001 top rate for income over $1 million, closing corporate tax loopholes and delaying tax cuts for the wealthy."

John Kerry (D-MA) who has consistently been a Veterans advocate, proposed S.Amdt. 3143 , to keep medical-care fees and co-pays from going up on military retirees, only to see it shot down by the Republicans.

Two measures by Senator Robert Menendez (D-NJ) -- S. Amdt. 4999 and S.Amdt. 3054 -- were proposed to provide additional funding to increase inspections at America's shipping ports and to improve the security of cargo containers destined for the United States. Both were killed on party line votes that saw only Jim Talent (R-MO) cross the aisle to vote with Democrats on one of the bills.

Chuck Schumer (D-NY) introduced S.Amdt. 4587 , to boost transit security funding in major cities by $300 million and saw it rejected by the Republican majority.

America's firefighters had a friend in Chris Dodd (D-CT) who proposed S.Amdt. 4641 in July "..to fund urgent priorities for our Nation's firefighters, law enforcement personnel, emergency medical personnel," but saw it go down on the Senate floor because he proposed paying for it "by reducing the tax breaks for individuals with annual incomes in excess of $1,000,000" -- obviously the kiss of death in a GOP-controlled Congress.

Byron Dorgan (D-ND) proposed S.Amdt. 4292 , to thoroughly weed out fraud and war profiteering among big Republican donors like Halliburton and had it defeated 44-52 , with only one Republican -- Lincoln Chafee again -- siding with Democrats, troops and American taxpayers.