Of all the people MSNBC could have invited on Monday to give a cool, calm, and rationale response to the New York Times issuing a correction to its reporting that the alleged victim of an incident involving Brett Kavanaugh does not remember the incident, they chose former Obama White House Deputy Counsel Deputy Assistant to the President Christopher Kang. Kang's big takeaway from the correction was just because she doesn't remember having Brett Kavanaugh's penis shoved in her face, does not mean it didn't happen.

MSNBC Live host Hallie Jackson began by asking Kang to explain why we should believe this story, considering groups such as his Demand Justice, say we should believe the victim even though the victim does not want to talk about it and her friends say she does not remember the alleged event. Kang said that if Kavanaugh does not like being accused of sexual assault and sexual harassment it is his own fault for not calling the FBI to perform a "a full and exhaustive investigation." Kang then speculated:

The fact that the woman may have been drunk and not remembered the incident in particular doesn't mean it didn't happen. It doesn't mean that there weren't witnesses who have come forward to say that it happened.

The Times' big witnesses in its piece was Max Stier, who just happened to be a former Clinton defense attorney at the same time Brett Kavanaugh was working for Ken Starr.

When asked by Jackson whether Democrats should impeach Kavanaugh, Kang replied "Absolutely," but unwittingly admitted that the Times' piece has nothing to do with that, "We've been calling on House Democrats to take action since April to look into the sham Kavanaugh confirmation process."

During the entire 10:00 hour, there was no conservative alternative to Kang's wild speculation or to rebut his old allegations.

Here is a transcript for the September 16 show: Click "expand" to read more.