A bankrupt cell of the Circuit City cell line. The retail RNA inside had to find something else to do.

The differences between the technological and biological cells are ones of scale, but not function. The function is to embody complexity in the form of a conduit or dissipative structure which most effectively accelerates the degradation and dissipation of a fuel or energy gradient. A key requirement is that the energy intensive complexity must at least be compensated by the flow through the conduit. That is, the cell must process enough energy to at least “break-even” in its self-assembly and maintenance. Self-organization of dissipative structures, simple at first, must be coded in information as complexity increases as the probability of their formation becomes equally less likely with increases in complexity.

The technological cell functions like a biological one in that it is an organized structure that functions much like a siphon, pulling in resources and energy, feeding them through a conduit of complex metabolism and then exporting product into the environment along with waste heat and material. Once the thermodynamic gradient between high grade energy and waste heat is established, it can be self sustaining. As heat is exhausted into the environment, more combustion can occur within the cellular metabolism without temperatures rising to a degree that would damage or destroy the metabolic machinery. Any cell which operates at a loss, failing to cover its fixed and variable costs, will eventually die or in the technological realm, go bankrupt. Cells that provide “profit” take in more energy than used by the metabolism and are able to reproduce with the excess energy and resources. You may find this in rapidly expanding technological cell lines like “Starbucks” whose income must far outweigh expense. Rapid growth in cells can occur in a situation like this. But unfortunatly for many human RNA that form a part of the technological cell metabolism, working with machines to produce the output, their portion of the energy/resource input can be squeezed so as to create a greater difference between the income/expense ratio which can be captured by the “owners” of the cell line or company. Attending a specialized school or obtaining a license to become a rarer and desired functioning RNA can sometimes work to increase pay or a portion of income, but this is becoming less so as the nucleoli or schools are increasingly taking their student’s future earnings through debt, even as the environment offers fewer and fewer opportunities for employment, income and growth.

Certificate given by nucleolus (school) certifying that RNA (student) is proficient at a high school level in analog mind development and use of information, thereby qualifying the applicant for working in a technological cell.

All life and its consequent complexity is determined by thermodynamics and various forms of dissipative structures or conduits will come and go as conditions dictate. It should be recognized that cells that have a net income while feeding upon highly concentrated and potent fossil fuels, may fail to achieve break-even as the fuels become more depleted and diffuse. In this case there will be massive cell death and an unsupportable population of human RNA which will unlikely survive a return to the ecosystem from which they cancerously emerged.

“Some estimates extend their timeline into deep prehistory, to “10,000 BC“, i.e. the early Holocene,[1] when world population estimates range roughly between one and ten million.

Estimates for yet deeper prehistory, into the Upper Paleolithic, are of a different nature. At this time human populations consisted entirely of non-sedentary hunter-gatherer populations, which fall into a number of archaic species or sub-species, some but not all of which may be ancestral to the modern human population due to possible archaic human admixture with modern humans taking place during the Upper Paleolithic. Estimates of the size of these populations are a topic of paleoanthropology. A late human population bottleneck is postulated by some scholars at approximately 70,000 years ago, during the Toba catastrophe, when the Homo sapiens population may have dropped to as low as between 1,000 and 10,000 individuals.”[2][3][4] – Wikipedia

It appears that a healthy ecosystem can support a population between one and ten million humans. Going forward, due to sudden climate change, we will have anything but a stable and healthy ecosystem. There’s no reason to believe that the current episode of malignant growth will be any less damaging to the human population than the Toba eruption. Conversion to wind and solar power, which will require increasing and ongoing industrial activity, will at best only maintain “break-even” for some proportion of currently existing technological cells for a short while, before sounding the death knell for the ecosystem. Creating solar and wind energy gathering devices does not at all address the tendency towards malignant growth and associated damages to the ecosystem.

Humans seem unable to shrink their footprint upon the planet, basically because they’re not happy with getting less. Thermodynamics will be the great arbiter in this matter. In the meantime, even though the emaciated cancer patient struggles to eat, the cancer’s only solution is further growth.

The Dancing Shiva could represent thermodynamics and the dancing dissipatives within the confines of the earth, heat released by flames at the periphery, one foot firmly planted upon the aspiring Megacancer, the filth of the earth, while the other untainted foot is held beyond the desires of the body.

The following video shows what happens when break-even is not achieved due, in this case, to inadequate jobs and compensation for human RNA.The domestic cells go out of business too.