Physical health is a definite sign of genetic health. I don’t know why anybody would think a scrawny, wimpy, effeminate man is supposed to be more attractive than a fit, built, masculine man.

It is not something to take pride in to be weak. Being weak and unhealthy does not somehow make a man superior over being strong and healthy.

Many of the problems men have today is their insistence on being weak, while simultaneously having an extreme arrogance about themselves. I’ve even seen it on this site. Some posters take great pride in being physically unhealthy and working extremely mediocre jobs. It never seems to occur to them that fit, healthy men can also have them beat on intelligence and income.

If you look at the men in high positions in many industries, especially finance, it’s usually fit men at the top. The ones lower on the rung get overworked and are unhealthy, but certainly not those at the top.

Most men overwork themselves trying to get somewhere they’ll never reach, certainly not as a worker dog for someone else. Probably not even on their own. They’re like women that cling to used up old vagina because that’s all they have and they know it’s all they have, so they try to take pride in some crappy job, attacking others because they need to believe, despite reality staring them in the face, that it isn’t really anything special.

Unless you have a terminal illness or handicap, any man that cleans up his nutrition and takes a casual interest in a regular, even light workout routine will see himself become healthy and fit. Our human bodies are designed to be that way. A hundred years ago the men of back then would be appalled to see how fat, frail and weak the average American is now. We comment on women becoming landwhales, but if a man is scrawny then that’s just as bad.