Max from Freeport, FL

At first I thought Bulaga whiffed on his block when Mack got the strip-sack on Kizer. But when I saw the replay it looked as if Bulaga had Mack blocked and had good position and technique, but Kizer stepped to the right edge of the pocket and positioned himself in front of Mack for an easy sack and subsequent fumble. Was that sack really on Kizer?

There's not much a lineman can do in that situation except be ready to pounce on the ball if it comes out, and Mack never made it available.

Jordan from Walpole, MA

Granted the information out there about Rodgers' injury is very limited, but do you believe that his injury given time will get better throughout the season or will it be an all-season issue?

He said Wednesday he was feeling better, but he gave no timetable as far as how long he might be dealing with this. If he plays, what happens in the games will certainly factor.

Bill from Bloomfield Hills, MI

I bet I can guess the winner of the 100 Moments brackets.

We might be surprised what the online crowd decides.

Derrick from Watertown, SD

I thought Rodgers did a fine job on Sunday night and his passer rating suggests my perception is correct. However, his QBR was in the 40s which is considered below average. What accounts for the discrepancy in these measures? Does QBR not include the fourth quarter?

I didn't know much about QBR, so your question prompted me to look into it. Best I can tell, Rodgers' number was low for two reasons – the high number of yards after catch generated by his teammates, and the fact that his first two TD passes came when the Packers' win probability remained statistically low. QBR also does not upgrade for "clutch situations," as it used to, but it still downgrades for "garbage time." If you look at the graphic we posted the other day about Green Bay's win probability throughout the game, the Packers' chances were under 20 percent at the time of the Allison TD and barely over 25 percent when Adams scored. It would appear, on the surface, that the QBR formula didn't give much value to those touchdowns, as probability-wise they were in borderline "garbage time." Add in the fact that the game-winning TD was a huge YAC play by Cobb, and the number spit out makes us scratch our heads. It just goes to show there's no computer or formula that's ever going to account for everything accurately.

Carroll from Madison, WI

You've said before that the key to offensive production against the Vikes is separation. Isn't this where Jimmy G's ability to shoulder his cover guy backwards and present a huge target may be a game-changer?

That's always a possibility with Graham, depending on how the opponent defends him. The Bears succeeded at taking Graham out of the game, as Rodgers explained, but if that means Cobb, Adams and Allison are going to combine for 19 catches, 299 yards and three TDs, the Packers will take it. What will the Vikings decide to do against Graham? We'll see. Last week, for what it's worth, San Francisco tight end George Kittel had five catches for 90 yards against Minnesota.

Russ from Bowie, MD

Nice job on the WYMM segment. Very educational. Did you see anything in the performance of the secondary in the first game that shows you they can play a zone effectively? I think Mike Pettine prefers man coverage, but it's important that his defense is able to play multiple schemes. The Bears head coach said after the game that the Packers played more zone than he expected. My question is, how well did the Packers play it? We won't have the element of surprise next time.

Teams will continue to surprise one another with unscouted looks throughout September. It's the way this works. After that, there aren't many secrets left. The Packers caught the Bears a little off-guard with early zone looks, and Pettine said they manned up in coverage late in the game. If Pettine's various DB packages prove effective in both man and zone, the Packers can pick and choose as they go along, rather than have the opposing offense dictate to them. But one game does not constitute proof. Green Bay is facing more accomplished quarterbacks the next two games.

Scott from Green Bay, WI

I don't care (and certainly hope the players don't care) about how many rushes Montgomery had, about how many catches Graham had, about establishing the run, or establishing a passing game down the middle. The game plan should be take what the defense gives. Pass the ball 20 straight times on the perimeter if that's what the defense is allowing, yes?

You play to win the game.

Andrew from Concord, NC

How does the defense "take away concepts from the offense," as Mike McCarthy put it?

Personnel and alignment. If you see something on film that's a sight adjustment by the offense, such as different route combinations run from the same formation based on the defensive set, the defense can figure out how to line up to prevent that concept from being run.

Derrick from Rockaway, NJ

Is "get prints on the tablets" the new "watch film"?