onemv:

winterywitch:

but no watch they’ll come out like [MRA voice] i dont think men are BETTER than women, i just think that men are physically stronger, bigger and are more geared towards logic. women are physically weaker, smaller and more geared towards emotions. this is just biology, people!!!!!! sheesh!!!!!!!!!! stop calling me a “””””””misogynist”””””””

As far as character traits I don’t have a comment. Physical traits however? That isn’t MRAs, that’s science. Sexual Dimorphism is a real thing, it’s common to mammals, and a lot of birds as well. It’s part of why we can tell male and female skeletons apart.



Have you ever looked at Olympic results? In almost every competition that is decided strictly on physical traits(speed, strength, etc) The male who places last almost always does better than the female who won gold.

But as much fun as it is to deliver simple scientific facts that anyone should know by the end of a 6th grade education, I’m going to talk about how feminists exploited sexual dimorphism in order to achieve their goals.

In the mid-eighties a major focus of feminism was domestic abuse. Well I should say abused women, they were pretty busy covering up/denying evidence that women were equally abusive.

Denying all the evidence to the contrary, they fought for and won Mandatory Arrest Laws. The idea being to get the dangerous man out of the house, no matter whether the poor female victim wanted him arrested or not. Just another case of feminists deciding they knew better than individual women what was best for them.

These are laws in many states now, they require police responding to a DV call to arrest the aggressor. Now bear in mind despite over 20 studies by 1985 showing that DV was symmetrical, feminists were convinced that it was strictly men doing the abusing. Which is understandable to a degree, back then it was almost exclusively men being arrested in those calls.

However the laws backfired. Instead of the results supporting their narrative, they instead supported the reality they had been denying and while the arrest rate of men got a bump of about 37%, the arrest rate of women in DV calls skyrocketed 446%. Well they were shocked and astounded. These women could not possibly be the aggressors. Arresting these women as aggressor was revictimising survivors of abuse. Their reasoning? The Duluth Model of Domestic Violence.

The Duluth Model was then used in conjunction with Sexual Dimorphism (see we finally got to it!) to craft a set of laws and guidelines for police to use when responding to DV calls. These are Primary/Predominant Aggressor laws/policies.

These laws and policies redefine the legal definition for “aggressor” in one specific setting. Nowhere else is the new definition applied.

These policies are used to find the “true aggressor” in a DV situation. How does it exploit sexual dimorphism? Because the true aggressor in the situation will be taller, heavier, and stronger. Things that automatically point to the male in almost every heterosexual relationship. There are other factors. Like who is the better fighter, who is calm, other things that are more likely to point to the male.

It’s had a real and tangible effect as well. Because of these policies men are better off telling the hospital they fell on the knife their girlfriend put in their chest than get the police involved.

So in the end feminists got what they wanted, and used sexual dimorphism to achieve it. Men are almost exclusively the ones arrested on DV calls. Their only defense is to have video if them sitting still, weathering abuse, asking her to stop, and not even trying to defend himself.

Equality™

And no I’m not an MRA. I just live in the real world where we use facts and evidence.

