Zadek



This is great, thanks for the link to the report. Such will have to be slowly grafted onto the system, and can not be prescribed, despite the fact that most of us are anthropogenic social engineers at heart. Over decades, to include more aspects of natural capitalism, but within the confines of actuary to enable the market functioning of private and private goods is a likely evolution.



While China need alter, and especially in cleaner directions, do not assume that the go-for-growth model is over. There are many challenges to seeing it start, and it will take decades merely to alter the structure of GDP safely; without such a more gross adjustment.



Winners to drive adjustment, and losers to obstruct is a hopelessly irrelevant construction. It is none to sure that "winners" can drive, or that there are "losers", let alone that they can obstruct, such devices are better left to play-writes and fiction writers for your constructs titillating vacuity. Rather these additions will and have eventuated. Silently, under the backdrop of the world economy as it exists are many numbers of the technologies and advances in material science, energy, and other areas required for the movement toward a green economy to eventuate.



But even such that notions of winners and losers can exist, highlights that such can and will be perceived by many of the lessor reviewers, decision-makers, policy analysts, and observers out there. Such inhibits the ability to move in useful directions. Certainy carbon fibre and green need rise in preference, but be sure that in your frames you avoid resorting to cheap devices that work counter to desired goals, nor to elevate constructs to such immediate heights that they are discounted outright. This technique of 19th century revolutionary Socialism quickly falls by the wayside, despite the desire by libertarians, anarchists, ethno-ecentrics, and single-issue warriors for it to be otherwise. the educated classes outpace communication professionals.