Don't Edit

Steve Huyser-Honig

10th in spending: Montana

Per capita spending 2013: $712

2013 highway spending: $722,664,000

2013 population: 1,014,864

Per capita spending 2008: $666

2008 highway spending: $650,688,000

Per capita spending 2003: $629

2003 highway spending: $577,989,000

Don't Edit

Charlie Riedel

9th in spending: South Dakota

Per capita spending 2013: $801

2013 highway spending: $677,233,000

2013 population: 845,510

Per capita spending 2008: $564

2008 highway spending: $450,868,000

Per capita spending 2003: $578

2003 highway spending: $441,222,000

Don't Edit

Nati Harnik

8th in spending: Nebraska

Per capita spending 2013: $807

2013 highway spending: $1,507,623,000

2013 population: 1,868,969

Per capita spending 2008: $753

2008 highway spending: $1,352,037,000

Per capita spending 2003: $482

2003 highway spending: $838,680,000

Don't Edit

Tony Talbot

7th in spending: Vermont

Per capita spending 2013: $827

2013 highway spending: $518,471,000

2013 population: 626,855

Per capita spending 2008: $633

2008 highway spending: $395,224,000

Per capita spending 2003: $504

2003 highway spending: $311,633,000

Don't Edit

Don't Edit

Julio Cortez

6th in spending: New Jersey

Per capita spending 2013: $841

2013 highway spending: $7,492,167,000

2013 population: 8,911,502

Per capita spending 2008: $450

2008 highway spending: $3,920,547,000

Per capita spending 2003: $740

2003 highway spending: $6,363,829,000

Don't Edit

Elaine Thompson

5th in spending: Washington

Per capita spending 2013: $931

2013 highway spending: $6,490,862,000

2013 population: 6,973,742

Per capita spending 2008: $595

2008 highway spending: $3,901,250,000

Per capita spending 2003: $375

2003 highway spending: $2,288,427,000

Don't Edit

Julie Jacobson

4th in spending: Wyoming

Per capita spending 2013: $974

2013 highway spending: $568,138,000

2013 population: 583,223

Per capita spending 2008: $1,051

2008 highway spending: $573,994,000

Per capita spending 2003: $929

2003 highway spending: $467,505,000

Don't Edit

AP Photo/The Canadian Press, Marcel Vander Wier, Whitehorse Star

3rd in spending: Alaska

Per capita spending 2013: $1,334

2013 highway spending: $990,634,000

2013 population: 737,259

Per capita spending 2008: $1,062

2008 highway spending: $730,157,000

Per capita spending 2003: $953

2003 highway spending: $618,077,000

Don't Edit

Jason Lindsey

2nd in spending: North Dakota

Per capita spending 2013: $1,479

2013 highway spending: $1,022,368,000

2013 population: 723,857

Per capita spending 2008: $716

2008 highway spending: $470,772,000

Per capita spending 2003: $593

2003 highway spending: $379,015,000

Don't Edit

Don't Edit

Pat Crowe II

1st in spending: Delaware

Per capita spending 2013: $1,479

2013 highway spending: $1,368,025,000

2013 population: 925,240

Per capita spending 2008: $773

2008 highway spending: $683,120,000

Per capita spending 2003: $1,136

2003 highway spending: $928,846,000

Don't Edit

Don't Edit

Evan Vucci

42nd in spending: California

Per capita spending 2013: $417

2013 highway spending: $16,008,155,000

2013 population: 38,431,393

Per capita spending 2008: $402

2008 highway spending: $14,697,263,000

Per capita spending 2003: $265

2003 highway spending: $9,348,994,000

Don't Edit

Jeff Greenberg

43rd in spending: Alabama

Per capita spending 2013: $411

2013 highway spending: $1,988,339,000

2013 population: 4,833,996

Per capita spending 2008: $406

2008 highway spending: $1,916,256,000

Per capita spending 2003: $349

2003 highway spending: $1,572,139,000

Don't Edit

Jeff Roberson

44th in spending: Missouri

Per capita spending 2013: $398

2013 highway spending: $2,407,696,000

2013 population: 6,044,917

Per capita spending 2008: $430

2008 highway spending: $2,544,619,000

Per capita spending 2003: $371

2003 highway spending: $2,119,856,000

Don't Edit

Don't Edit

John Locher

45th in spending: Nevada

Per capita spending 2013: $381

2013 highway spending: $1,063,921,000

2013 population: 2,791,494

Per capita spending 2008: $342

2008 highway spending: $906,377,000

Per capita spending 2003: $359

2003 highway spending: $806,564,000

Don't Edit

Nashville Convention & Visitors Corp.

46th in spending: Tennessee

Per capita spending 2013: $337

2013 highway spending: $2,187,374,000

2013 population: 6,497,269

Per capita spending 2008: $283

2008 highway spending: $1,770,528,000

Per capita spending 2003: $284

2003 highway spending: $1,660,505,000

Don't Edit

Marco Garcia

47th in spending: Hawaii

Per capita spending 2013: $329

2013 highway spending: $462,864,000

2013 population: 1,408,987

Per capita spending 2008: $334

2008 highway spending: $444,335,000

Per capita spending 2003: $300

2003 highway spending: $374,894,000

Don't Edit

Fredrick Joe

48th in spending: Oregon

Per capita spending 2013: $322

2013 highway spending: $1,263,177,000

2013 population: 3,928,068

Per capita spending 2008: $362

2008 highway spending: $1,364,346,000

Per capita spending 2003: $277

2003 highway spending: $983,165,000

Don't Edit

Bruce Smith

49th in spending: South Carolina

Per capita spending 2013: $319

2013 highway spending: $1,522,617,000

2013 population: 4,771,929

Per capita spending 2008: $325

2008 highway spending: $1,470,375,000

Per capita spending 2003: $287

2003 highway spending: $1,190,908,000

Don't Edit

Don't Edit

Kim Schneider

50th in spending: Michigan

Per capita spending 2013: $305

2013 highway spending: $3,021,773,000

2013 population: 9,898,193

Per capita spending 2008: $329

2008 highway spending: $3,268,570,000

Per capita spending 2003: $279

2003 highway spending: $2,798,807,000

--The District of Columbia is included in these rankings, making the bottom two spenders 50th and 51st

Don't Edit

Georgia Department of Economic Development

51st in spending: Georgia

Per capita spending 2013: $268

2013 highway spending: $2,678,677,000

2013 population: 9,994,759

Per capita spending 2008: $402

2008 highway spending: $3,817,237,000

Per capita spending 2003: $226

2003 highway spending: $1,949,804,000

--The District of Columbia is included in these rankings, making the bottom two spenders 50th and 51st