Whether you call this a thread or a tweet-storm (or maybe both), this rant from Matt Glassman on Congress having a ‘retirement problem’ and other nuggets of wisdom is definitely worth your time and a read.

Congress has a retirement problem. And now you're going to have to deal with a goddamn tweetstorm from me about it. 1/ — Matt Glassman (@MattGlassman312) August 2, 2019

Keep reading.

Here's the basic problem: the fun and interesting things are becoming a much smaller part of the job, while the tedious and soul-crushing aspects are increasingly occupying members' time. 2/ — Matt Glassman (@MattGlassman312) August 2, 2019

And as we know, politics in 2019 can be truly soul-crushing.

Or is that just this editor covering it?

The examples are endless, but can be quickly summed up. In the past, most members participated substantively in the policy process via the committee system. But the process is now tightly controlled by leadership, reducing opportunities for members to influence legislation. 3/ — Matt Glassman (@MattGlassman312) August 2, 2019

In other words, nobody cares about governing anymore, they only care about scoring points on the other side. Matt said it way better though so … yeah.

Hard work in a policy area is often unrewarded, reducing the incentive to dig into an issue, nevermind develop real expertise. 4/ — Matt Glassman (@MattGlassman312) August 2, 2019

Yup.

Conversely, members face increased uncertainty about their own re-elections, as national partisan winds control more and more of their fate regardless of how well they represent their districts, and well-funded primary challengers threaten even general-election safe districts. 5/ — Matt Glassman (@MattGlassman312) August 2, 2019

Ding ding ding.

Which means more time than ever is spent raising money and preparing for campaign season. 6/ — Matt Glassman (@MattGlassman312) August 2, 2019

More time running, less time solving problems.

Here's the big picture rub: there's an equilibrium to all this, and it's not a good one: the types of people who run for Congress will tend to be people who don't find the job miserable. 7/ — Matt Glassman (@MattGlassman312) August 2, 2019

That is, over time, people who retire because they wanted to engage in policy but ended up just dialing for dollars will be replaced by people who don't really care about making policy and don't mind dialing for dollars. 8/ — Matt Glassman (@MattGlassman312) August 2, 2019

People who want power love today’s political game.

People who truly went into public service to serve the public, not so much.

Now, some people might just be fooled, thinking the job will be fun. But those people won't last long. The people who thrive in this environment will be people who don't mind the grind, and don't really wish it was any different. 9/ — Matt Glassman (@MattGlassman312) August 2, 2019

Kamala Harris. *ahem*

If all you ever wanted to be was a foot-soldier for a party who got some free lunches and a little bit of respect in DC, you probably won't be too miserable here. 10/ — Matt Glassman (@MattGlassman312) August 2, 2019

Now, whether that's good or bad hinges on a normative assessment of how Congress should operate. I'm of the mind that a transformative legislature that develops policy and plays a serious role within the separation of powers system is a good thing. 11/ — Matt Glassman (@MattGlassman312) August 2, 2019

There’s a reason we have THREE branches of government.

Just sayin’.

But there are plenty of people who would just as soon hollow out out the legislature, move policy development to the executive branch and the parties, and be done with it. So your mileage may vary. 12/ — Matt Glassman (@MattGlassman312) August 2, 2019

But my point is more that there's no automatic trigger here that would lead anyone to fix this problem, because as the problem grows, the membership itself is transformed into a body that doesn't really mind the problem. 13/ — Matt Glassman (@MattGlassman312) August 2, 2019

Playing politics is FUN.

You can see this in many of the younger members—they have no expectation that they'll be able to propose floor amendments in the House, or that committee drafts will be the bills that come out of the Rules Committee. Why would they? They've never lived in that legislature. 14/ — Matt Glassman (@MattGlassman312) August 2, 2019

Ok, this is just getting depressing now.

People used to talk about this all the time in regard to the House minority, especially before 1995. It sucked being in the minority, because you didn't really get to do anything. As the famous saying goes, their job was to collect their paycheck and shut up. 15/ — Matt Glassman (@MattGlassman312) August 2, 2019

And every study of the matter showed the same results: the minority had more trouble recruiting high-quality candidates, because on balance, people who were smart, engaged, and energized about politics had little interest in coming to DC to sit in a permanent minority. 16/ — Matt Glassman (@MattGlassman312) August 2, 2019

It was a huge pathology for the GOP during their 40 years in the wilderness in the House. They had trouble recruiting good candidates, they had trouble keeping good people around, and that became a vicious cycle toward losing elections and staying in the minority. 17/ — Matt Glassman (@MattGlassman312) August 2, 2019

My fear is that the same is now happening for serving in Congress in general, and that the downward spiral will be difficult to counteract. /end — Matt Glassman (@MattGlassman312) August 2, 2019

HUGE points for numbering his tweets. Seriously. If you write an awesome thread, number those puppies … just sayin’. It makes it so much easier to write about later.

Also, great thread, right?

Told ya’.

Related:

‘LOL WHAAAAAT?!’ Valerie Jarrett gets WAY more than she asked for with tweet about people missing Obama and ROFL

‘Absolutely DISGUSTING’: Don Lemon’s HATEFUL behavior while interviewing black Reverend about Trump is shockingly BAD (watch)

‘Delete THIS!’ Soledad O’Brien’s terrible, horrible, no-good, very racist tweet about ‘black people’ at Trump rally goes SO WRONG