by New confederate ramenia » Sun Oct 18, 2015 3:22 pm

Before you start talking about political anarchism, read the Wikipedia article. Do you think there's a way to clearly differentiate between science and pseudoscience? Do you think science is right and pseudoscience is wrong?There is no difference between science and pseudoscience, because there is no science and pseudoscience. There is no fixed scientific method to follow.Scientific dogma would have us believe that science is the only way of attaining knowledge. All of pre-scientific history contradicts this claim. Pre-scientific societies have had accurate views of the world that did not derive from scientific method. Science itself has been influenced by pseudoscience, and this has helped science in many cases. Science suffers from serious bias and institutional flaws . For these reasons, there is no demarcation line between science and pseudoscience. There is no absolute scientific method, and no science itself.What do you think, NSG? Is science pseudoscientific? Or is there a real difference between science and pseudoscience?