Michael Wilbon is somehow now even more cranky about Jacob deGrom winning the NL Cy Young award.

The “Pardon The Interruption” co-host went on another bizarre tirade against the Mets ace and all of baseball on Thursday, when he accused analytics of “hijacking” baseball and allowing deGrom to win the award, despite nearly being the unanimous choice (29 of 30 votes) for the award.

“You know, Tony [Kornheiser], I’m not with these people. I don’t respect their judgment, actually, because I don’t value what they value,” Wilbon said. “I value winning the damn game more than the ERA! And therefore, it is analytical hijacking. These people have hijacked baseball, they want to impose their will and tell you what’s important. I don’t share most of, maybe none of, their values, and it’s absurd.”

OK.

In September, Wilbon first voiced his displeasure with the 30-year-old even being considered for the award due to his then-losing record.

“If [deGrom] goes 8-11 and wins the Cy Young, then all the people voting for the Cy Young should be dismissed,” Wilbon said during the show.

Well, deGrom didn’t go 8-11. He got some help and rounded out the season with a 10-9 record and a sparkling 1.70 ERA, the lowest in all of baseball. His streak of 29 consecutive starts allowing three earned runs or less, which remains active, is the longest run in MLB history.

Wilbon isn’t alone in the analytics-hating camp. San Diego Union-Tribune writer John Maffei was the lone baseball writer to vote who didn’t have him pegged as the best pitcher in the National League. He selected Nationals stud Max Scherzer, basing his decision on dinosaur stats wins and losses, according to his column.