Vladdi Basarab

2016-05-23 16:23:31 -0400

IN THE OLD DAYS THEY BURNED BOOKS .



The fascist Lord of FASCBOOK , Mark Zuckerberg, was recently caught on an open microphone assuring Germany’s latest insane Chancellor that he’d help her to censor dissenting voices who didn’t like having their families lives and livelihoods endangered by her plan to overrun the populace she was sworn to protect and defend, with hordes of foreign criminal trespassers posing as victims.



One can’t have honest, mutual-problem-solving conversations, or win objectively factual arguments, with leftist criminals, simply because they are prejudicially bigoted adversaries, not debate partners.



Evil only poses as stupidity.



Criminals, who can’t support their “Crime is good! Trust me!” rhetoric with facts, must, by necessity, substitute feelings! Short-circuiting a victim’s thinking is the only way for their lies to “win!”



And slanderous attacks are the best ways to instantly disarm victims by putting them on the defensive.

The second-best way to disarm one’s victims is to tell them they are generally always victims anyway.



Liberals – being criminals just as much as muslims – embody and project “The Adversary” in that they habitually and reactively adopt hypocrites adversarial subjective double standards.



They lie because they hate being already equal to everyone else.



CRIMINAL LEFTARDS ARE ALWAYS REALLY ONLY ALL ABOUT PROJECTING

<b>“I’M BETTER THAN YOU !”</b> Which is why they are inconsistent/objectively irrational all the time.



If and when one’s criminal stance is all about subjective double-standards, (and so also against all objectively equal universal rights and responsibilities for everyone else); where one asserts that only one’s own “better” faction has rights, while all others have only responsibilities to one’s self and one’s faction, then of course pretty-much each and every issue one addresses will be inconsistent and seemingly irrational and “libtarded!” But they are deliberate habitual choices and consistently follow a clear principle of victim-blaming, slanderous, adversarial selfishness. One cannot by mere random chance be so perfectly wrong about everything all the time due to inherent “stupidity;” by chance one would get the occasional fact right, and be able to solve the occasional problem. But libertine “liberal” criminals aren’t about solving objective problems for the universal good of all.



They are all about objectifying “the Other” – without victims to blame, they couldn’t be parasites.



They “project” by slandering everyone else as trying to get ahead by putting others down (i.e: their hatred of basic economics aka capitalism, where one actually has to work in order to acquire and own stuff; whereby they assert that capitalists only really ever enslave working people)! But what they really mean is, they’d like to enslave the capitalists! The implication is that those evil makers shouldn’t be allowed to corral investors to build factories and companies, hire staff or buy office furniture etc, unless and until they agree to forego their profits and give them to the takers, first!



They claim that nobody else should ever have any right to own property, or even to be reimbursed for their labor, since they simply can’t be bothered to work to acquire any property for them selves!



Criminals are lazy in that they’d rather complain about being others’ victims than make stuff.



What they want is no less than the officially-recognized right to remain irresponsibly wrong enshrined into law, so that the largest gang, aka the government, can take the makers stuff and transfer it to the takers. Their official term for this blatant robbery is “Wealth Redistribution,” and they like to pretend they are all virtuous, Robin-Hood-like figures for expounding their crime-is-good philosophy.



And when they get caught out, they always say “So? It’s not bad, because We (i.e: you) all do it too!”

commented