Fuller House pricing.png

There's no way the Tanners could afford this house now. (Screengrab via Al Jazeera.)

As you settle down with Netflix's "Full House" revival this weekend, Al Jazeera has an interesting look at what may have actually happened to the Tanner home. It's been 21 years since the ABC sitcom went off the air and since that time, the cost of living in San Francisco has skyrocketed

According to Al Jazeera, a home in the Lower Pacific Heights neighborhood that sold for $725,000 in 1990 is now worth $3.1 million. That's more than twice the rate of inflation. (It would have been just under $1.4 million if the house's value went up at that rate.)

The video claims that those most affected by the increase in housing costs are renters, minorities and the artistic community.

The median rent for a two-bedroom apartment in the city 25 years ago was $975, compared to $4,700 today. The black population in San Francisco also went from 9 percent in 1990 to 5.8 percent in 2015. And 70 percent of artists have been pushed out because of rising costs.

Fortunately for the Tanners, they owned the place before housing in the city became increasingly unaffordable.

But if it weren't for the fact that they were inheriting the house in the series pilot, the stars of "Fuller House" -- the two eldest Tanner daughters and insufferable neighbor Kimmy Gibbler -- could never buy the house outright. They're a veterinarian, a DJ and a party planner.

In fact, the only family member who could probably afford to move back into the neighborhood is the only one who doesn't appear in the Netflix revival -- Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen's Michelle is apparently a New York fashion mogul in the new series.

Watch the video below:

Fuller House in the Real San Francisco Full House is back! Have mercy! Here's what the show would look like if they got San Francisco living right. Posted by AJ+ on Friday, February 26, 2016

--Eder Campuzano

503.221.4344

@edercampuzano

ecampuzano@oregonian.com