JSR #372

JavaServer Faces (JSF 2.3) Specification.

Public Review Ballot

Ballot duration: 2017-02-21 to: 2017-03-06

These are the final results of the Public Review Ballot for JSR #372. The EC has approved this ballot. Votes

EC Azul Systems, Inc. Credit Suisse Eclipse Foundation, Inc Fujitsu Limited Gemalto M2M GmbH Goldman Sachs & Co. Grimstad, Ivar Hazelcast Hewlett Packard Enterprise IBM * Intel Corp. Keil, Werner London Java Community MicroDoc NXP Semiconductors Oracle Red Hat SAP SE Software AG SouJava Tomitribe Twitter, Inc. V2COM

Icon Legend Yes No Abstain Not voted

* EC Member : Voting rights have been suspended according to JCP 2.8 View Vote Log

EC

On 2017-03-06 Eclipse Foundation, Inc voted Yes with no comment. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-02-28 V2COM voted Yes with no comment. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-02-22 SouJava voted Yes with no comment. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-02-22 London Java Community voted Yes with no comment. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-02-22 Grimstad, Ivar voted Yes with no comment. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-02-22 Azul Systems, Inc. voted Yes with no comment. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-02-22 Credit Suisse voted Yes with no comment. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-02-22 Gemalto M2M GmbH voted Yes with no comment. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-02-22 Software AG voted Yes with no comment. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-02-22 NXP Semiconductors voted Yes with no comment. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-02-21 Oracle voted Yes with no comment. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-02-22 Hazelcast voted Yes with no comment. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-03-06 IBM voted Yes with the following comment: IBM's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms. IBM supports licensing models that create an open and level playing field by allowing third parties to create independent implementations of Java Specifications and that do not allow individuals or companies to exercise unnecessary control for proprietary advantage. We support open source as a licensing model for contributions in the JCP, and would hope others will support this direction. This comment is not necessarily directed at the current business or license terms for this JSR, however, it is a statement of IBM's preferred licensing model. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-03-01 Hewlett Packard Enterprise voted Yes with no comment. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-02-26 Fujitsu Limited voted Yes with the following comment: Fujitsu's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-03-01 MicroDoc voted Yes with no comment. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-03-01 SAP SE voted Yes with no comment. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-03-06 Twitter, Inc. voted Yes with no comment. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-02-23 Keil, Werner voted Yes with no comment. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-02-24 Red Hat voted Yes with the following comment: Red Hat's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms. Red Hat would prefer a licensing model that creates an open arena for everyone, including those not members of the JCP and removes any ability for one individual or vendor to exert undue control over a standard. We are an open source company and hence would like to see such a licensing model for JCP contributions. Note however, that this comment is not necessarily directed at the license terms for this JSR, but is a statement of Red Hat's preferred licensing model. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-03-02 Goldman Sachs & Co. voted Yes with no comment. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------



