What YOU say, Estanislao Deloserrata, is completely false. Because the cut in export and commodities taxes effectively translates in income redistribution, from common people to the wealthy. How? The income that Argentine State loses by erasing this taxes, is recovered by eliminating energy subsidies (to generation, distributors and end users). So on, every industry and commerce will have to deal with a most expensive energy use, and that TRANSLATES in a chain reaction that will increase manufacture prices, more inflation (and not only industry, the other categories too, everyone that has to pay an energy monthly tax). So everything will be inevitably more expensive to mid-class people (and don´t forget the poor), and we will REALLY feel it. Plus more home energy tax. Plus less real salary value due to 35% devaluation (we feel that RIGHT NOW). What this policies really pursue, is to contain the economic demand. To the other things you say: I prefer public debt to external debt and not owing my country`s sovereign policy capability to IMF or vulture funds. So, public debt is a thing to correct in the future, but not that bad in the terms you say. It´s just the opposite. Macri´s government will probably decrease public debt by acquiring external debt, which is MUCH WORSE, especially for an emerging country like Argentina. That only brings IMF recipes which mean adjustment, and who pays? Common people. Explain me how a government that is not doing other thing than firing people from the public sector (and private too), and strategic functions of the State (Fabricaciones Militares-Military Manufactures-, ARSAT project and many others) will orientate its policies to generate employment. Preposterous, just an oxymoron. What they really pretend is to increase the unocuppied people basis as a salary claim adjustment variable. Our Finance Minister´s declarations help this idea: "claim salaries or look after jobs". To conclude, prove that Stiglitz was "paid" by the former governmet, that`s easy to say, especially if you disagree with this guy´s statements. I tend to think that YOU are the one paid if you think in a so pro-new government way. I don´t know where are you from, I am from Argentina and lived always here. If you also did, by what you say it seems your pocket is walthy and do not have much economic worries. History proves that every pro-US right-wing government like this one has brought hunger, poverty, economy recession and deindustrialization to my country. If you don´t like what Stiglitz says, you can check Mark Weisbrot. He will tell you something similar. Of course, you may thing he was also paid by former Argentine government. Goodby and best regards.