Huber, Horowitz ‘probes’ of Hillary Clinton, Spygate nothing but cover for the Deep State

It’s been more than eight months since Salt Lake City-based U.S. Attorney John Huber was appointed by then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions to investigate ‘alleged’ abuses of the law by 2016 Democratic presidential nominee and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

It’s been about the same amount of time since Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz first revealed Obama-era FBI, DoJ, and intelligence community malfeasance and lawbreaking regarding the “Spygate” operation launched by the former president and his sycophantic #NeverTrump allies in the Deep State.

Yet to date, despite all of the claims that these two men are hot on the trail of various suspects, nary a one of them who stands accused of repeated violations of U.S. law, protocol, and departmental regulations has been brought before a grand jury and charged.

Supposedly, these â€˜investigationsâ€™ are continuing to this day.Â What’s going on? Investigative reporter Paul Sperry, along with the well-connected sleuth journos atÂ Conservative Treehouse, bothÂ have a theory: The investigations are all a sham designed to provide cover for the guilty parties so that, if nothing else, the statute of limitations will run out before anyone is charged.

Let’s start with Huber.

When Sessions appointed him, he called Huber a ‘special prosecutor in every way but name.’ That means Huber has ostensibly been given the authority to convene a grand jury, issue subpoenas, and charge people with crimes.







But he hasn’t done any of those things. TheÂ real special counsel, Robert Mueller, meanwhile, has.

Sperry notes:

RealClearInvestigations has learned from potential witnesses, their lawyers and others close to the investigations, that Huber has not impaneled a federal grand jury to subpoena witnesses or hear evidence.

They are puzzled as to why he has failed to interview key witnesses â€“ such as disgraced FBI officials and Trump advisers targeted by them, as well as Clinton Foundation whistleblowers — who could shed light on whether FBI and Justice Department officials misused their power when they obtained spy warrants to monitor Trump adviser Carter Page; or whether such officials turned a blind eye to millions of dollars in foreign Clinton Foundation donations influencing Clintonâ€™s official decisions as secretary of state. Even when whistleblowers have reached out to Huber, offering reams of evidence, his office has not followed up, they say.

Questions about what Huber’s actually doing have come up before. In October we reportedÂ that “hardly anyone” had heard from him, “and that includes key witnesses whom he should have interviewed by now â€” but hasnâ€™t.”

Now as then, they are anxious to tell their stories to Huber — meaning, of course, that theyÂ have stories to tell.

So missing in action has Huber been that even members of Congress have begun to ask about him.

â€œI would just like to know what heâ€™s doing,â€ Rep. Jim Jordan, Ohio Republican, told the WashingtonÂ Times.Â â€œIâ€™ll take anything. All I know is that we havenâ€™t heard a single thing about what heâ€™s doing.â€

When it looked like Congress would finally have an opportunity to hear from Huber earlier this month — while the GOP still retains control of the House — the Justice DepartmentÂ refused to allow him to testify.

However, two whistleblowers –Â Lawrence DoyleÂ of DM Income Advisors andÂ John MoynihanÂ of JFM Associates â€” informed House Freedom Caucus chairman Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., and his Government Oversight Committee that they turned over evidence to Huberâ€™s officeÂ three timesÂ since Huber was assigned his investigation in April because those materials kept getting â€˜lost.â€™

Sperry says this was all a sham:



