<div style="margin:20px;margin-top:5px;">

<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px;">Quote:</div>

<table border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" width="99%"><tr><td class="alt2" style="border:1px inset;">

<div>Originally Posted by <strong>Bullveyr</strong> <a href="showthread.php?s=f0ff622456a527c34b14aeab359ee59d&p=11144171#post11144171"><img alt="View Post" class="inlineimg" src="http://static.overclock.net//img/forum/go_quote.gif" style="border:0px solid;"></a></div>

<div style="font-style:italic;">I guess you took the max. speeds from ESReality MouseScore and that Japanese Guy (<a href="http://www.pc-max.de/artikel/eingabegeraete/32-gamer-maeuse-im-test" target="_blank">PC-MAX.de</a> also has a benchtable)?<br>

I wouldn't take some of those as "fixed absolute values", ESReality MouseScore is limited to the QcK and the Japanese Guy also has some of his results only on 1-2 surfaces.<br><br>

Now some additions:<br><br><b>MS Habu:</b><br><br>

it has the same sensor as the CH (S3018), dunno how put that on Wikipedia. <img alt="" class="inlineimg" src="/images/smilies/biggrin.gif" style="border:0px solid;" title="Big Grin"><br><br><b>MX518:</b><br>

Not sure on what version of the MX518 those 2 benches where done but perfect controle speed can be higher than 2m/s.<br><br><b>G9x/G500/G700</b><br>

On what are those speeds based, a mix between the official specs and the benchtable results? (official specs would be 4.19m/s btw).<br><br><b>Razer DB:</b><br><br>

The Plasma has the same sensor as the Krait (S3018) with an IR LED.<br><br><b>Orochi:</b><br><br>

Same sensor as the Lachesis, no need for the "?". <img alt="" class="inlineimg" src="/images/smilies/wink.gif" style="border:0px solid;" title="Wink"><br><br><b>Ikari Optical:</b><br><br>

Afaik the Ikari loads the A3080 srom if set to 1600 CPI, so they aren't interpolated.<br><br><b>Ikari Laser:</b><br><br>

It's OviationONS <b><span style="color:#FF0000;">I</span></b>, not <b><span style="color:#FF0000;">II</span></b><br><br>

Iirc it goes down to 1 CPI (exclusive to SS).<br><br><b>Xai:</b><br>

Actually "Mouse Prediction: No, can enable" would be correct but that's just me being funny. <img alt="" class="inlineimg" src="/images/smilies/biggrin.gif" style="border:0px solid;" title="Big Grin"><br><br>

It's A9500, not S9500, and iirc it goes down to 100 CPI.<br><br><b>Zowie EX1/2:</b><br><br>

Afaik the same as with the Ikari Optical, so no Interpolation.<br><br>

Would need a "*" because a different lens affects the tracking speeds.<br><br><b>A4Tech X-718BK:</b><br><br>

A3080<br><br>

+ you can add interpolation for every A4Tech mouse<br><br><b>NAOS 3200:</b><br><br>

From what I have read it only offers 800/1600/3200 CPI.<br>

Whatever that means even more interpolation is present or they really use a 3rd party lens (unlikely).<br><br><b>Roccat Kova:</b><br><br>

iirc it uses an IR LED<br><br><b>Philips twin-eye:</b><br><br>

I wouldn't call it V1 and V2, that sensor was around before the Lachesis (originaly used in a Logitech mobile mouse).<br><br>

Afaik the 3200 CPI version (Silverstone Raven) would be PLN 2030, 4000 CPI is PLN 2031 and the 5600 CPI one would be the PLN 2032.</div>

</td>

</tr></table></div>

Alrite, will fix.<br><br>

Just making it clear that the google spreadsheet is open to everyone. Anyone can edit if they find something wrong.<br><br><br>

Edit. Is the habu LED or Laser? It starts with an LED sensor code, but the perfect control and malfunction speeds tested @ esreality were in laser territory.<br><br><div style="margin:20px;margin-top:5px;">

<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px;">Quote:</div>

<table border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" width="99%"><tr><td class="alt2" style="border:1px inset;">

<div>Originally Posted by <strong>Tyson86-88</strong> <a href="showthread.php?s=f0ff622456a527c34b14aeab359ee59d&p=11141560#post11141560"><img alt="View Post" class="inlineimg" src="http://static.overclock.net//img/forum/go_quote.gif" style="border:0px solid;"></a></div>

<div style="font-style:italic;">I thought at g1 and mx510 is established Avago 3060</div>

</td>

</tr></table></div>

I'm confused about this as well. Between Perfect control and malfunction rates, none of the 3060's match up with each other. They're either using custom firmware or something along the lines. Sujoy and others on esreality stated that the sensor was indeed a S2020.<br><br><div style="margin:20px;margin-top:5px;">

<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px;">Quote:</div>

<table border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" width="99%"><tr><td class="alt2" style="border:1px inset;">

<div>Originally Posted by <strong>lb_felipe</strong> <a href="showthread.php?s=f0ff622456a527c34b14aeab359ee59d&p=11143356#post11143356"><img alt="View Post" class="inlineimg" src="http://static.overclock.net//img/forum/go_quote.gif" style="border:0px solid;"></a></div>

<div style="font-style:italic;">Does the G9x work so good as G500 on 9HD?<br><br>

Through some posts I have read that the negative acceleration in G500 is avoided by using the 4HD/9HD. As its sensor is exactly the same used in G9x (different to used in Xai), would it work well on that surface mousepad?</div>

</td>

</tr></table></div>

Hard pad is preferred. May people experience random positive/negative acceleration on cloth. Avago themselves have confirmed this problem with all versions of the ADNS-9500.<br><br><br><div style="margin:20px;margin-top:5px;">

<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px;">Quote:</div>

<table border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" width="99%"><tr><td class="alt2" style="border:1px inset;">

<div>Originally Posted by <strong>yashau</strong> <a href="showthread.php?s=f0ff622456a527c34b14aeab359ee59d&p=11143678#post11143678"><img alt="View Post" class="inlineimg" src="http://static.overclock.net//img/forum/go_quote.gif" style="border:0px solid;"></a></div>

<div style="font-style:italic;">I have also heard of negative accel on the Avago 9500 but have so far failed to reproduce any. I do get a bit of positive regardless of the surface I use. I really can't find any reputable source of info. Your post has got me confused too lol :|<br>

About the lift distance. I thought it depended on the sensor</div>

</td>

</tr></table></div>

Depends on sensor position and or lens. Take the Ikari Optical and Zowie EC1/2 for example. Same sensor, but the Ikari has a LOD of 3.5mm and the EC1/2 has a LOD of 1.5mm.<br><br>

Edit: If you want a column for LOD, then sure I guess we can do that, but I'm going to need help filling it in. Just making it clear that it's going to be based on the mouse, and not the sensor.<br><br><div style="margin:20px;margin-top:5px;">

<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px;">Quote:</div>

<table border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" width="99%"><tr><td class="alt2" style="border:1px inset;">

<div>Originally Posted by <strong>rpgman1</strong> <a href="showthread.php?s=f0ff622456a527c34b14aeab359ee59d&p=11141816#post11141816"><img alt="View Post" class="inlineimg" src="http://static.overclock.net//img/forum/go_quote.gif" style="border:0px solid;"></a></div>

<div style="font-style:italic;">So which mice do you recommend if you want the least amount of problems?</div>

</td>

</tr></table></div>

That depends on your grip and surface.