People biking and taking transit will be funneled to certain streets.

City planners opted against recommending a “complete streets” policy, a simple directive that compels planners and engineers to favor pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, and cars — in that order — on every street. The hierarchy has proven transformational in places like Minneapolis. But it’s not in Denver’s cards, at least for now.

Instead, Blueprint creates a more complex “modal priority” network [PDF]. Maps identify where walking should dominate (all streets), where biking is the street’s main function, and where transit is the priority. Some streets will prioritize all three modes, like Broadway.

“With a complete streets manual, we could lay out an ideal street type, but in an existing city with constrained right of ways and also a very robust network to rely upon, not all streets can… do all things at one time,” said David Gaspers, principal city planner with Denver Community Planning and Development.

This approach is a double edged sword. On one hand, a transit-priority street that currently caters only to cars, like 17th Street, might see a bus lane supplant a general travel lane.

“There are going to be places, because of limited right of way, where on top of saying, ‘Yes, we need to accommodate pedestrians so they can get to their bus,’ we may need to prioritize transit or bicycle facilities over other modes,” said Sarah Showlater. “And we actually do see that as very innovative and being up front with the community about what happens when you’re trying to fit so many different modes in a network of streets that have already been built out.”

But several important thoroughfares — including Colfax Avenue, Federal Boulevard, and Colorado Boulevard — won’t be complete streets under this arrangement. They’ll prioritize people walking and using transit, but protected bike lanes have no place there, according to Blueprint maps.

Yet corridors like those are expected to absorb around 20 percent of all new households and around 25 percent of new jobs, meaning the most important thoroughfares of the future won’t be available for biking… still. The city’s future bike network will have parallel alternatives, according to Gaspers.

More detailed design guidelines that actually get used

The plan suggests design guidelines that match neighborhood characteristics to street types [PDF]. For example, driveways where cars can cut into the sidewalk should be pretty rare on “downtown streets,” “main streets,” and “mixed-use” streets. They’d be more acceptable on “commercial streets,” “industrial streets,” and “residential streets.”

This idea of street types isn’t new. Though more detailed, it was part of the first iteration of Blueprint. The difference is that, again, these guidelines would become part of internal regulations that DPW would have to follow.

Blueprint recommends other pedestrian-friendly policies and regulations as well, including:

A fix to construction zone detours

Eliminating exemptions for developers to build sidewalks

A framework for “shared spaces” where people walking, biking, and driving interact (think woonerfs)

“Access management” policies to reduce conflicts between pedestrians and drivers crossing the sidewalk into their destinations

Ensuring cafe seating doesn’t obstruct the sidewalk

These are all just ideas

Denver has no shortage of plans calling for a great walking, biking, and transit network. Denver is also very far away from a great walking, biking, and transit network.

It will take political will on the part of Mayor Michael Hancock, his appointees, and Denver City Council to pass, fund, and implement these policies and projects.

The plan is still malleable and open for comment if you want to weigh in on what you’d like to see changed.

The next article in this series will examine how development and land use policies recommended in “Denveright” could improve walking, biking, and transit.

