Huffington Post’s Ja’han Jones demonstrates in a recent article how even a Left-wing darling of a very special and protected ethnic group can be thrown under the bus by anti-White activists if he is perceived to have violated their taboos about what is impermissible to say. Jones describes Maher, a New York Jew, as “a dangerous White man” who “uttered the word ‘nigger’ on his show last Friday.” Jones notes that Maher apologized for his “inexcusable” utterance but is disturbed because he “pa[id] very little deference to Black people who the joke concerned.” Jones goes on to describe Maher’s use of this word as a “crime” of “racism” even though Blacks routinely use this word in their music, comedy, film and daily life.

Here is where it gets interesting. Jones then attacks White liberals in particular and White people in general, writing:

It is their passivity amid this controversy which poses clear danger and also betrays the phenomenon of White Liberalism™…. Whiteness, in its very existence, is inherently dangerous; it is a fictitious character trait developed only as an antithesis to—and presumed class above — Blackness. And Bill Maher, as one of the foremost practitioners of whiteness, represents a particular danger because he serves our society as a caricature of radical liberalism…. Herein lies the dilemma: Without condemning outright people who are white, it must be said that Whiteness as a thought experiment is problematic. It is religion of its own, with a strict adherence to racial hierarchy that so often silences and marginalizes people of color.

Contrary to Jones’ assertion, our race (or sub-species) is a product of evolutionary biology, not a “fictitious character trait.” He asserts that “Whiteness is problematic” and “inherently dangerous.” What is the solution to this dangerous problem? A professor (also named Maher, by chance) at Drexel University offered a final solution to the White problem not long ago. Does Jones endorse White genocide?

The anti-White hysteria being whipped up in the media and academia is truly breath-taking when confronted head-on. And those like Maher, a Leftist urbanite Jew and media darling, are in danger of being lumped in with us. Those of us on the Alt-Right or in Southern Nationalist circles may recognize Maher for an enemy who slipped up and made a racial joke on TV. But when Jones and those of his ilk look at Maher all they see is a “dangerous White man.”