To the question What would make IPFS most compelling to people building new apps?, I feel like the choices aren’t representative of IPFS. None of these things are what people want to use IPFS for, because it’s not particularly reliable, nor fast, nor easy to use. I personally use it because it’s a distributed filesystem that’s self-deduplicating. It saves cost on storage and makes it easier to keep content online for longer than on HTTP. It also makes it far easier to share files than FTP or “free” online hosts that shoves ads down your throat and reduces the quality of whatever you put there, be it videos or images, but IPFS itself is not particularly easy to use.

Also, to the question What makes a good IPFS gateway?, I’d say it’s not doing this :

reddit r/ipfs - CloudFlare banned video streaming on their public IPFS node. 33 votes and 28 comments so far on Reddit

But that choice isn’t even there. Easy to remember domain name and Caching are just requirements to have a public node at all. It won’t run properly without any form of caching, it’d be basically be a plain old proxy.

I feel like this form isn’t complete enough to grasp what could improve CloudFlare’s node.