Download raw source

Delivered-To: john.podesta@gmail.com Received: by 10.25.24.71 with SMTP id o68csp1003824lfi; Sun, 8 Mar 2015 14:03:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.59.112 with SMTP id y16mr53022677wjq.36.1425848618557; Sun, 08 Mar 2015 14:03:38 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <cheryl.mills@gmail.com> Received: from mail-we0-x236.google.com (mail-we0-x236.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c03::236]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h8si25053527wja.42.2015.03.08.14.03.37 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 08 Mar 2015 14:03:38 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of cheryl.mills@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c03::236 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c03::236; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of cheryl.mills@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c03::236 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=cheryl.mills@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: by mail-we0-x236.google.com with SMTP id k48so23423879wev.5; Sun, 08 Mar 2015 14:03:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=NxSpkSu4Mu59fUVFRDr5WuFCML2oTVaPEf+LUEw5MTM=; b=dOeuAG6deKbgPagCN7V+mH45H9bfSZgXF/k4j9zFn8knEJJgNuTPJFiBXVNfLf6Duo J20FNeGvbVEBynqd8hAeVzI5yq0SeliA4lkO06Zc5Ehv+SwbvVqDBLS283Te9mKQ8Xpr 7LQP4tXnoAme/6Ddo0YeJOo5poAhCHHy2bxn7C/xPqWjVEQ6VJFHImiUD4TPznvWFRQr Fgz71+A9xrFvsL9tA4/4QdzoUP8Ifn4isGWAEtYC9bUpWkaMtMaLjryEuplBrTz2FA/m rWghFm2nRmWI2eV5JwnQxAhy52vhtvf16gzfxI+1bmKs81eszBUsf7U4RcNVkGzxkQTG D5VA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.74.202 with SMTP id w10mr25911562wiv.0.1425848617724; Sun, 08 Mar 2015 14:03:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.27.51.1 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Mar 2015 14:03:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150308200330.5902416.69948.1793@hrcoffice.com> References: <20150308052425.5902416.5861.1550@hrcoffice.com> <20150308200330.5902416.69948.1793@hrcoffice.com> Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2015 17:03:37 -0400 Message-ID: <CALk44aCGQ_mC-yfDCTGKNxKf1VB4QHV2b_s58MYo=gDuNox3mg@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: New Ways From: Cheryl Mills <cheryl.mills@gmail.com> To: Philippe Reines <pir@hrcoffice.com> CC: John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com>, Jennifer Palmieri <jennifer.m.palmieri@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043d650b5cf0e60510cd40e7 --f46d043d650b5cf0e60510cd40e7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 i not with you On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Philippe Reines <pir@hrcoffice.com> wrote: > 2 things on this. First, I shared my thoughts with Jen so adding her > here. Second, just hung up with Hrc who was looking for an update and I > ended it with this. It's fair to say she appreciates the utility of doing > this. > > > *From: *Philippe Reines > *Sent: *Sunday, March 8, 2015 12:24 AM > *To: *John Podesta; CDM > *Subject: *New Ways > > This might sound a little out there but I think you ought to consider > this gesture to the new team given their legitimate misgivings: > > We put out on background to one or two VERY friendly and maleable > reporters that what HRC decided to do in the end in terms of what will be a > tremendous disclosure was in large part because of the new team's strong > advice and feeling that she tell it all, for better or for worse. That > after several initial days of not having our footing, they injected > refreshing advice that HRC wholeheartedly agreed with. A sign that while > the campaign team is still coming together and gelling, they already are > having an impact on the way we do business, showing that even if it's a > little bumpy to start, things WILL be different this time. > > Good for them, good for her, bad for Cheryl & me but in the scheme of > things it's a minor indignity as compared to others coming our way. I'm > happy to take one for the new team, it really is in her best interest which > is all that really matters. > > I'm not suggesting this be put to a conference call vote, but if you > agree Jen and/or I could easily inject this as a very minor piece of > background tomorrow (today). > > > > > > > > > --f46d043d650b5cf0e60510cd40e7 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr">i not with you</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div cl= ass=3D"gmail_quote">On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Philippe Reines <span d= ir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:pir@hrcoffice.com" target=3D"_blank">pir@h= rcoffice.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" sty= le=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> <div> <div style=3D"width:100%;font-size:initial;font-family:Calibri,'Slate P= ro',sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125);text-align:initial;background-color= :rgb(255,255,255)"> 2 things on this. First, I shared my thoughts with Jen so adding her here. = Second, just hung up with Hrc who was looking for an update and I ended it = with this. It's fair to say she appreciates the utility of doing this.= =A0</div> <div style=3D"width:100%;font-size:initial;font-family:Calibri,'Slate P= ro',sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125);text-align:initial;background-color= :rgb(255,255,255)"> <br> </div> <div></div> <div style=3D"font-size:initial;font-family:Calibri,'Slate Pro',san= s-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125);text-align:initial;background-color:rgb(255,25= 5,255)"> </div> <table width=3D"100%" style=3D"background-color:white;border-spacing:0px"> <tbody> <tr> <td colspan=3D"2" style=3D"font-size:initial;text-align:initial;background-= color:rgb(255,255,255)"> <div style=3D"border-style:solid none none;border-top-color:rgb(181,196,223= );border-top-width:1pt;padding:3pt 0in 0in;font-family:Tahoma,'BB Alpha= Sans','Slate Pro';font-size:10pt"> <div><b>From: </b>Philippe Reines</div> <div><b>Sent: </b>Sunday, March 8, 2015 12:24 AM</div> <div><b>To: </b>John Podesta; CDM</div> <div><b>Subject: </b>New Ways</div> </div> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <div style=3D"border-style:solid none none;border-top-color:rgb(186,188,209= );border-top-width:1pt;font-size:initial;text-align:initial;background-colo= r:rgb(255,255,255)"> </div> <br> <div> <div>This might sound a little out there but I think you ought to consider = this gesture to the new team given their legitimate misgivings: </div> <div><br> </div> <div>We put out on background to one or two VERY friendly and maleable repo= rters that what HRC decided to do in the end in terms of what will be a tre= mendous disclosure was in large part because of the new team's strong a= dvice and feeling that she tell it all, for better or for worse. That after several initial days of not having our= footing, they injected refreshing advice that HRC wholeheartedly agreed wi= th. A sign that while the campaign team is still coming together and gellin= g, they already are having an impact on the way we do business, showing that even if it's a little bumpy to= start, things WILL be different this time.=A0</div> <div><br> </div> <div>Good for them, good for her, bad for Cheryl & me but in the scheme= of things it's a minor indignity as compared to others coming our way.= I'm happy to take one for the new team, it really is in her best inter= est which is all that really matters.=A0</div> <div><br> </div> <div>I'm not suggesting this be put to a conference call vote, but if y= ou agree Jen and/or I could easily inject this as a very minor piece of bac= kground tomorrow (today). </div> <div><br> </div> <div><br> </div> <div><br> </div> <div><br> </div> <div><br> </div> <div><br> </div> <div><br> </div> <div><br> </div> <div></div> <div></div> </div> </div> </blockquote></div><br></div> --f46d043d650b5cf0e60510cd40e7--