Joseph P. Kennedy, the father of the assassinated John Fitzgerald Kennedy, and his equally ambitious, and exceedingly courageous brother, Robert, or "Bobby" Kennedy (R.F.K.), had been the American Ambassador to the United Kingdom prior to, and during World War Two. An exceedingly wealthy man, Joseph had become a political force, and with the wealth to make himself heard, was often at odds with then President, Franklin D. Roosevelt. Mr. Kennedy has often been made into a villain by historians for his very vocal positions during the time leading up to World War Two. As the father of nine Children, Kennedy was very adamant that none of his children should be subjected to war for a European problem. He was a total isolationist, and a great friend of Nevil Chamberlain, the pacifist Prime Minister who'd tried to appease Hitler to achieve what he thought would be "peace in our time."

Things that have to be remembered concerning "The Ambassador," as Joseph P. Kennedy was forever afterwards known, are casually disregarded in popular culture, and even the more biased "historical" works or comments that I've seen. Joseph P. Kennedy had aligned himself with Isolationism and appeasement. He wasn't a seer, and so his very personal, and logical ideas concerning what were definitely European problems that should have been solved by Europeans are now looked at as having been a failed strategy. Even worse, Winston Churchill, a villainous Rothschild minion if there ever was one, with a speaking ability the equal of the then United States Naval Officer, John Fitzgerald Kennedy - is looked upon by history as if he hadn't helped engineer the sinking of the Lusitania.

As it stands today, Churchill is not thought of as the accomplice to the murder of American citizens - but that is what he was. Chamberlain and Kennedy's appeasement failed, and so they are looked at as cowards. That J.P. Kennedy and Nevil Chamberlain were cowardly is contrary to the meme that hindsight is 20/20. Hindsight, I tell you, is the history written by victors, and isn't always representative of the truth at all.

So Joseph Patrick Kennedy Sr. was often called a "casual anti Semite," but this is not true. There is no such thing as a casual racist, one is either a racists, or is not a racist. Opposing sending your children to war does NOT make you a racist. Are "white" American soldiers who fought against Italians and Germans considered anti "white?" No, they are NOT, as that would be completely illogical. So it is also illogical to call someone an "anti Semite" for opposing Ashkenazi Jews controlling the entire world's central banking systems, and mass media. After all, had the Nazis won the second world war, we'd surely have Germans running those institutions instead, but there'd be little cry, and little slander applied to those who would bemoan such monopolies. Why is this? Because history and implied reality are created by the victors. It was never the world's job to send it's sons and daughters to die for Israel, or for Jews living anywhere - and opposing sending your children to war to save Israel or European Jews does not make you an "anti Semite," it makes you sane.

Hate, my friends, is like porn - you know it when you see it. Nobody ever accused Joseph P. Kennedy of being a hateful man.