(Photo: Jonathan Ernst / Reuters)

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg has a problem with the way this Congress handles Supreme Court confirmation hearings.

The 85-year-old justice was asked Wednesday how the hearings of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh compared with her own during an event at George Washington University Law School.

President Bill Clinton nominated Ginsburg to the Supreme Court in June 1993, and the U.S. Senate voted 96-3 to confirm her two months later.

“The way it was was right. The way it is is wrong,” Ginsburg said.

During Kavanaugh’s hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Democrats have pushed back hard against President Donald Trump’s nominee in an attempt to stop the Supreme Court from leaning even further to the conservative right. Democrats are worried about how Kavanaugh, who would replace retiring Justice Anthony Kennedy, would rule on issues relating to the investigation into Trump’s campaign and Russian interference in the U.S. election. Also a point of contention: Democrats warn that Kavanaugh may threaten the Roe v. Wade ruling that established the right to abortion.

Adding to the drama surrounding the hearing, Sens. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) and Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii) released Kavanaugh’s previously confidential emails on the third day, giving Democrats even more fuel to scrutinize the judge.

Judge Brett Kavanaugh faced a firestorm of questions from Democrats during his confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee. (Photo: BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI via Getty Images)

Ginsburg said Wednesday that the “atmosphere” surrounding Supreme Court hearings were “truly bipartisan” when she was nominated in 1993, noting that she won the votes of nearly all the Republican senators despite her work with the American Civil Liberties Union.

Ginsburg also pointed out that all the Democrats in the Senate in 1986 voted to confirm Justice Antonin Scalia, who was famous for his conservatism.

“Think of Justice Scalia, who’s certainly a known character. The vote was unanimous,” Ginsburg said.

“That’s the way it should be, instead of what it’s become, which is a highly partisan show. The Republicans move in lockstep, and so do the Democrats. I wish I could wave a magic wand and have it go back.”

Story continues

This isn’t the first time Ginsburg has criticized divisiveness in politics.

In April, the Justice, again noting her 96-3 Senate confirmation vote, said that members of Congress are lacking camaraderie.

“You don’t see that kind of friendship existing in Congress anymore,” she said at a Duke University event. “You might recall that when I was nominated by President Clinton, the vote was 96-3. It’s not that way anymore.”

Ginsburg, who reportedly is committed to a serious workout regimen, also took some time Wednesday to flex a little muscle on her fellow Supreme Court justices.

Asked who on the court could do more pushups than her, Ginsburg replied, “Maybe Justice Neil Gorsuch,” her 51-year-old colleague, who she said rides his bike to work every day.

Ginsburg also added Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, 63, to the list: “I think our chief is also a possibility,” she said.

Watch Ginsburg’s entire talk at George Washington University here.

Related Coverage

Here's Another Brett Kavanaugh Email Republicans Didn't Want You To See

Ruth Bader Ginsburg Not Retiring Anytime Soon

Brett Kavanaugh's Confirmation Hearings Have Been Shrouded In Secrecy

Chaos Breaks Out At Brett Kavanaugh Hearing

Sheldon Whitehouse Asks Brett Kavanaugh If He Has A Gambling Problem

Also on HuffPost

On women serving on the Supreme Court: "People ask me sometimes... When will there be enough women on the Court? And my answer is: When there are nine."

On perceptions of gender balance: “So now the perception is, yes, women are here to stay. And when I’m sometimes asked when will there be enough [women on the Supreme Court]? And I say when there are nine, people are shocked. But there’d been nine men, and nobody’s ever raised a question about that.”

On the Notorious RBG meme, parodying the name of rapper Notorious BIG: "I think a law clerk told me about this Tumblr and also explained to me what Notorious RBG was a parody on. And now my grandchildren love it and I try to keep abreast of the latest that’s on the Tumblr. … [I]n fact I think I gave you a Notorious RBG [T-shirts]. I have quite a large supply."

On Supreme Court dissents: "Dissents speak to a future age. It's not simply to say, 'My colleagues are wrong and I would do it this way.' But the greatest dissents do become court opinions and gradually over time their views become the dominant view. So that's the dissenter's hope: that they are writing not for today but for tomorrow."

On the gay rights movement: “In recent years, people have said, ‘This is the way I am.’ And others looked around, and we discovered it’s our next-door neighbor -- we’re very fond of them or it’s our child’s best friend, or even our child. I think that as more and more people came out [as gay] and said that ‘this is who I am,’ the rest of us recognized that they are one of us.”

On social change for women: "The women of my generation and my daughter’s generation, they were very active in moving along the social change that would result in equal citizenship stature for men and women. One thing that concerns me is that today’s young women don’t seem to care that we have a fundamental instrument of government that makes no express statement about the equal citizenship stature of men and women. They know there are no closed doors anymore, and they may take for granted the rights that they have."

On women's liberation: "It is not women's liberation, it is women's and men's liberation."

On the evolution of legal opinions: "Justices continue to think and can change. They have wives. They have daughters. By the way, I think daughters can change the perception of their fathers. I am ever hopeful that if the Court has a blind spot today, its eyes will be open tomorrow."

Explaining why she fell asleep at the 2015 State of the Union: "I vowed this year just sparkling water -- stay away from the wine -- but the dinner was so delicious it needed wine."

On major portions of the Voting Rights Act being getting overturned by the Supreme Court in 2013: "Throwing out [the Voting Rights Act] when it has worked and is continuing to work to stop discriminatory changes is like throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you are not getting wet."

On trying to have it all in life: "Who -- man or woman -- has it all, all at once? Over my lifespan I think I have had it all. But in different periods of time, things were rough. And if you have a caring life partner, you help the other person when that person needs it."

On women's equality: "Women will only have true equality when men share with them the responsibility of bringing up the next generation."

On having children: "The decision of whether or not to bear a child is central to a woman's life, her well-being, and her dignity."

On her dream job: "People ask me, 'If you could be whatever you wanted to be, what would you be?' My first answer is not 'a great lawyer.' It is, 'I would be a great diva.' But I totally lacked that talent, so the next best thing is the law."

On feminism: "Feminism … I think the simplest explanation, and one that captures the idea, is a song that Marlo Thomas sang, 'Free to be You and Me.' Free to be, if you were a girl -- doctor, lawyer, Indian chief. Anything you want to be. And if you’re a boy, and you like teaching, you like nursing, you would like to have a doll, that’s OK too. That notion that we should each be free to develop our own talents, whatever they may be, and not be held back by artificial barriers -- manmade barriers, certainly not heaven sent."

On marriage: "In every good marriage, it pays sometimes to be a little deaf."

On a 2014 Supreme Court decision ruling that businesses such as Hobby Lobby have the right to withhold birth control from their employees' health insurance: "I should emphasize that none of us questioned the genuineness of the Hobby Lobby owners’ belief. That was a given. But no one who is in business for profit can foist his or her beliefs on a workforce that includes many people who do not share those beliefs."

On Citizens United and campaign finance: "If there was one decision I would overrule, it would be Citizens United. I think the notion that we have all the democracy that money can buy strays so far from what our democracy is supposed to be. So that’s number one on my list."

On same-sex marriage: "All of the incentives, all of the benefits that marriage affords would still be available. So you're not taking away anything from heterosexual couples. They would have the very same incentive to marry, all the benefits that come with marriage that they do now."

On generational differences: “My mother told me two things constantly. One was to be a lady, and the other was to be independent. The study of law was unusual for women of my generation. For most girls growing up in the ’40s, the most important degree was not your B.A., but your M.R.S.”

On her Supreme Court colleague and frequent ideological opponent Antonin Scalia: "So there we are on a very elegant elephant. My feminist friends say, ‘Why are you riding on the back of the elephant? and I said, ‘Because of the distribution of weight, we needed to have Scalia in the front.’”

Love HuffPost? Become a founding member of HuffPost Plus today.

This article originally appeared on HuffPost.