BitcoinEXpress



Offline



Activity: 1206

Merit: 1010









LegendaryActivity: 1206Merit: 1010 delete October 11, 2011, 03:10:38 AM

Last edit: May 30, 2016, 12:26:29 AM by BitcoinEXpress #1 delete

AWARD-WINNING

CASINO CRYPTO EXCLUSIVE

CLUBHOUSE 1500+

GAMES 2 MIN

CASH-OUTS 24/7

SUPPORT 100s OF

FREE SPINS PLAY NOW Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. Theymay beunsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal inyour jurisdiction. Advertise here.

Raoul Duke

Legendary



Offline



Activity: 1456

Merit: 1000









aka psyLegendaryActivity: 1456Merit: 1000 Re: delete October 11, 2011, 03:41:46 AM #5 I'm not a SolidCoin fanboy. And I'm certainly not a douchebagexpress fanboy also... Just stating how pathetic you are. A personal opinion...



If you were attacking any other blockchain my statement would be exactly the same. You are only entering an e-pissing contest, nothing more, you are not even trying to make a point on proving something worthwhile, just to prove us all how big your e-dick is, probably cause yor real dick is... oh nevermind...



BTW, I think you are forgetting that Solidcoin is a closed-source app and a centralized blockchain(by your own definition)... I wonder how many "anti-hacking laws" have you broken in your country. And you publicly admitted on doing so by posting it in an open board.



Pathetic and stupid, that's what you are. BTCAddress/OTC ID/GPG Key

johnj



Offline



Activity: 154

Merit: 100







Full MemberActivity: 154Merit: 100 Re: delete October 11, 2011, 03:45:12 AM #6 Quote from: CoinHunter on October 09, 2011, 05:24:32 PM



Also of note, 3 wannabe hackers from this forum claimed they would take down the SolidCoin 2 public beta and none have. Welcome to the future of cryptocurrencies, a truly secure network.







Regardless of what you think about BCX, him exposing flaws in what's been said to be a 'truly secure network' is a service to all who may use said network. As it's already been demonstrated that CH, erm.... 'doesn't work well with others', I don't see how anything other than a live attack could have communicated said vulnerabilities. Regardless of what you think about BCX, him exposing flaws in what's been said to be a 'truly secure network' is a service to all who may use said network. As it's already been demonstrated that CH, erm.... 'doesn't work well with others', I don't see how anything other than a live attack could have communicated said vulnerabilities. 1AeW7QK59HvEJwiyMztFH1ubWPSLLKx5ym

TradeHill Referral TH-R120549

Raoul Duke

Legendary



Offline



Activity: 1456

Merit: 1000









aka psyLegendaryActivity: 1456Merit: 1000 Re: delete October 11, 2011, 03:49:17 AM #7 Quote from: johnj on October 11, 2011, 03:45:12 AM Regardless of what you think about BCX, him exposing flaws in what's been said to be a 'truly secure network' is a service to all who may use said network. As it's already been demonstrated that CH, erm.... 'doesn't work well with others', I don't see how anything other than a live attack could have communicated said vulnerabilities.



So why didn't he attacked Bitcoin when it was just Satoshi and 1 or 2 more guys mining and proved also how insecure Bitcoin was? So why didn't he attacked Bitcoin when it was just Satoshi and 1 or 2 more guys mining and proved also how insecure Bitcoin was? BTCAddress/OTC ID/GPG Key

Raoul Duke

Legendary



Offline



Activity: 1456

Merit: 1000









aka psyLegendaryActivity: 1456Merit: 1000 Re: delete October 11, 2011, 04:00:46 AM #9 Quote from: SAC on October 11, 2011, 03:51:47 AM Kind of hard to break anti-hacking laws when you have been publicly invited by the author of the code to as he stated "do your best it is unbreakable" you may want to do some fact checking before spouting off and making a fool of yourself.

You may want to take some classes on how judicial systems work before spouting off and making a fool of yourself. And before you throw in jail someone who thinks what you're saying will hold up on court. You may want to take some classes on how judicial systems work before spouting off and making a fool of yourself. And before you throw in jail someone who thinks what you're saying will hold up on court. BTCAddress/OTC ID/GPG Key

DeathAndTaxes

Legendary



Offline



Activity: 1218

Merit: 1007





Gerald Davis







DonatorLegendaryActivity: 1218Merit: 1007Gerald Davis Re: delete October 11, 2011, 04:02:24 AM #10 I don't get the hate on BitcoinExpress. The reality is that the world has people w/ ill intent. Hackers expose flaws in systems. BE is exposing a flaw in SC 2.0. Better now then if/when it has millions of dollars of transaction volume and someone else double spends a quarter million and then kills the network.



I mean it you can't stand the heat then get out of the kitchen. This isn't a game of checkers it is a potential alternative to currency as we know it. If you think BE is the limit of what will eventually be thrown against a network well WAKE UP. The real world has mean, greedy, untrustworthly people. If there is a flaw they will find it.



Granted BE is somewhat of a douche personally (I think he takes just a little to much satisfaction in his work) but he does crypto-currency a good service.





grod



Offline



Activity: 154

Merit: 100







Full MemberActivity: 154Merit: 100 Re: delete October 11, 2011, 04:07:43 AM #11 Quote from: psy on October 11, 2011, 04:00:46 AM Quote from: SAC on October 11, 2011, 03:51:47 AM Kind of hard to break anti-hacking laws when you have been publicly invited by the author of the code to as he stated "do your best it is unbreakable" you may want to do some fact checking before spouting off and making a fool of yourself.

You may want to take some classes on how judicial systems work before spouting off and making a fool of yourself. And before you throw in jail someone who thinks what you're saying will hold up on court.

You may want to take some classes on how judicial systems work before spouting off and making a fool of yourself. And before you throw in jail someone who thinks what you're saying will hold up on court.

Who's got jurisdiction over this? Australian courts? United Nations? Al Gore? Court of public opinion? Who's got jurisdiction over this? Australian courts? United Nations? Al Gore? Court of public opinion?

DeathAndTaxes

Legendary



Offline



Activity: 1218

Merit: 1007





Gerald Davis







DonatorLegendaryActivity: 1218Merit: 1007Gerald Davis Re: delete October 11, 2011, 04:08:01 AM #12 2 blocks per second.....



The awesomeness of "CPU friendly" algorithms. No reason this same thing can't/won't happen to every "CPU friendly" FailCoin.

ThiagoCMC



Offline



Activity: 1204

Merit: 1000



฿itcoin: Currency of Resistance!







LegendaryActivity: 1204Merit: 1000฿itcoin: Currency of Resistance! Re: delete October 11, 2011, 04:09:30 AM #14 Quote from: johnj on October 11, 2011, 03:45:12 AM Quote from: CoinHunter on October 09, 2011, 05:24:32 PM



Also of note, 3 wannabe hackers from this forum claimed they would take down the SolidCoin 2 public beta and none have. Welcome to the future of cryptocurrencies, a truly secure network.







Regardless of what you think about BCX, him exposing flaws in what's been said to be a 'truly secure network' is a service to all who may use said network. As it's already been demonstrated that CH, erm.... 'doesn't work well with others', I don't see how anything other than a live attack could have communicated said vulnerabilities.

Regardless of what you think about BCX, him exposing flaws in what's been said to be a 'truly secure network' is a service to all who may use said network. As it's already been demonstrated that CH, erm.... 'doesn't work well with others', I don't see how anything other than a live attack could have communicated said vulnerabilities.

Agree! BTX is doing a huge favor for us! If it is unsafe, this needs to be done.



Just got my popcorn!! LOL Agree! BTX is doing a huge favor for us! If it is unsafe, this needs to be done.Just got my popcorn!! LOL

grod



Offline



Activity: 154

Merit: 100







Full MemberActivity: 154Merit: 100 Re: delete October 11, 2011, 04:13:56 AM #15 Quote from: Spacy on October 11, 2011, 04:09:23 AM Quote from: DeathAndTaxes on October 11, 2011, 04:08:01 AM 2 blocks per second.....



The awesomeness of "CPU friendly" algorithms. No reason this same thing can't/won't happen to every "CPU friendly" FailCoin.



Diff will solve this... Have you ever watched a new blockchain starting with low diff?

Diff will solve this... Have you ever watched a new blockchain starting with low diff?

And then BE pulls his cluster off, leaving patsies to mine .01 coins per week for the next six years. See: namecoin. Oh, except now with the threat of him taking the biggest dump since the invention of Ex-Lax on people's bids at any moment.



Yeah, I can see that driving adoption pretty hard.





And then BE pulls his cluster off, leaving patsies to mine .01 coins per week for the next six years. See: namecoin. Oh, except now with the threat of him taking the biggest dump since the invention of Ex-Lax on people's bids at any moment.Yeah, I can see that driving adoption pretty hard.

ThiagoCMC



Offline



Activity: 1204

Merit: 1000



฿itcoin: Currency of Resistance!







LegendaryActivity: 1204Merit: 1000฿itcoin: Currency of Resistance! Re: delete October 11, 2011, 04:15:59 AM #17 Love it! LOL

johnj



Offline



Activity: 154

Merit: 100







Full MemberActivity: 154Merit: 100 Re: delete October 11, 2011, 04:16:49 AM #19 I don't have any way to look at the diff/block generation, any screencaps? 1AeW7QK59HvEJwiyMztFH1ubWPSLLKx5ym

TradeHill Referral TH-R120549