



Before I begin, I, and the world of strength sports, owe a LOT to powerlifting. Powerlifting has given a lot in its short time. From powerlifting we got a ton of specialty bars and equipment, training gear that can either extend training longevity or improve performance, and Kaz, among other greats. However, powerlifting’s influence (through no fault of its own) hasn’t all been positive, and unfortunately is has been dragging down many new trainees who decide to venture out into the land of the internet and try to learn how to train. What was once a sport about getting as strong as possible and winning meets has become one fixated on setting internet records and achieving the highest WILKS. The whole world has turned upside down, cats and dogs are living together, mass hysteria, and so I say; go home powerlifting: you’re drunk.



Or possibly on bathsalts; jury is still out

The biggest issue that occurs with powerlifting is that trainees immediately equate powerlifting with strength training. This is a part of the process of learning about the different subgroups in the lifting world. Most of us, when we first got into lifting, identified any serious lifter as a bodybuilder. For most of us, this was simply the only thing we knew regarding someone who took lifting seriously. We were exposed to Arnold, knew he was a bodybuilder, saw the muscle mags full of bodybuilders, etc. Most of us still encounter this amongst our peers and family, in that, no matter what it is that we do, we’re bodybuilders. Once you dive a little deeper, one tends to learn that there is at least 1 other subgroup that ISN’T bodybuilders, and these people tend to be powerlifters.





However, realize that, once again, this is just lazy research manifesting itself. Of the select few that know there is a difference between a bodybuilder and a powerlifter, who among them ACTUALLY know what a powerlifter is compared to a strongman or weightlifter? Most people just take the quickest distinction; bodybuilders are people who train to get big, powerlifters are people who train to get strong. Knowing this, if you want to get big, you train like a bodybuilder, and if you want to get strong, you train like a powerlifter. And herein is where the crisis begins.





Not the first time a lot of strength was lost over a Crisis...Christ I'm a nerd

Let me come out and say a statement that is going to piss off a lot of people: powerlifting was NEVER about getting stronger. Not once, in the history of powerlifting’s existence, has it EVER been a sport about getting stronger. Powerlifting is about getting the highest total possible on 3 lifts. Getting stronger HELPS in powerlifting, but so does getting stronger help in American football, boxing, wrestling, basketball, swimming, etc. Because powerlifting has people specifically lifting weights, we interpret it to mean it’s a sport solely about strength, but this is simply confusing the effect for the cause. Powerlifters lift weights as part of their competition, but it is still fundamentally a sport/game with a goal of winning. This is why, in some cases, the strongest person at the meet DID NOT WIN.

How can I say this? It’s a strength sport, no? Yes, but it’s a SPORT, and strategy, technique and practice will ALWAYS come into play when discussing a sport. One of the key elements of practice is, of course, frequency and perfection. Hence, a powerlifter will often perform their competition lifts in their training, and they will do so in a manner where they are practicing to the standards of the sport in the hopes of engraining the correct motor pattern in order to maximize their skill improvement. This maximized skill translates into more weight moved, because one has become BETTER at moving higher weights; but we all know that BETTER does not mean STRONGER. The powerlifter is playing a game, and they’re playing it to win. If you are trying to get stronger, don’t play their game.



And don't hate the player







New trainees get confused by this. They see the frequent practice of a powerlifter in their programming, decide they want to train like a powerlifter because they want to “train for strength”, and then are aghast at the notion of only benching, squatting and deadlifting once a week at most. Surely such infrequent practice won’t allow one to maximize their strength, no? No! Once again, we confuse skill for strength here. If one benches twice a week, they practice the bench twice a week, and twice in that week they train their pecs, shoulders and triceps (yes yes bench nerds; I know there is MORE than that, just stick with me). If a trainee benches once a week and then does dips the other day a week, they practice bench 1 time and dips 1 time, but they STILL train their pecs, shoulders and triceps twice in that same week as well. The frequency is the same; the amount of STRENGTH gained can be the same, it is simply the skill that diminishes at one lift in exchange for an opportunity to practice another. BUT, consider the exchange here; less practice for an opportunity to train the body at different angles and get it stronger IN TOTAL versus in only on specific movement. Doesn’t that sound more rewarding for a NON-powerlifter, whose goal is to get as big and strong as possible rather than win a powerlifting meet?

But a big part of this pursuit of perfection on these lifts is because someone out there decided there needed to be some sort of gatekeeping of programs. You don’t get to do X program until you can squat Y, and if you can only squat Z, you are better off doing program W. It’s insanity, and purely a mechanism put into place for internet warriors to assert dominance over new trainees and maintain a status quo of mediocrity by prescribing awful training and never promoting anything that allows growth. Saying you need to lift a certain amount on a certain lift before you’re ready for a specific training program operates off some sort of insane belief that all humans will reach these lifts through the same training.



This guy MIGHT hit a 3 plate squat before the second coming of Jesus





Consider this; you take 1 trainee and have them ONLY squat, bench or deadlift. No assistance work, no conditioning, only those 3 lifts. You take another trainee and have them run a complete program, with a variety of core lifts and assistance work and conditioning. The first trainee will most likely have the higher total of the two in a short span, because the first trainee is solely dedicated to those 3 lifts. However, if the first trainee gets a 1000lb total in 6 months and the second trainee takes 2 years to get there, are we really saying the first trainee was more experienced than the second, and therefore more ready for a more advanced training template? Of course not. Those lifts were arrived at in totally different circumstances, and simply using a set number as a checkpoint makes zero sense without considering these factors. Trainees need to free their minds from the shackles that they have to pass some sort of standard before having permission to train.