If you believe the tall tale told by Newt Gingrich, he was paid $300,000 by Freddie Mac to be a historian who told them their business model was a disaster, their business was failing and their company was doomed. Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) should ask the organizers of future debates to interrupt their allowing Gingrich unlimited time, and grant him permission to be heard during the debate, to challenge Newt about this ridiculous, absurd story.



If there is one person who believes the Gingrich storyline, please explain. This is the difference between a credible and serious voice against major financial practices, Ron Paul, and yet another Paul impersonator, Newt Gingrich.



Whether one agrees with Paul or not, he is serious and credible. By contrast, Gingrich talks the financial-reform talk while he walks the crony-capitalist walk, takes the Freddie Mac money and runs.



I predicted Donald Trump Donald John TrumpTrump signs bill averting shutdown after brief funding lapse Privacy, civil rights groups demand transparency from Amazon on election data breaches Facebook takes down Trump campaign ads tying refugees to coronavirus MORE would implode. I predicted Rick Perry would implode. I predicted Herman Cain would implode. These three have looked more like the Three Stooges than credible voices of true conservatism or credible candidates to be president of the United States.



I hereby predict that Newt Gingrich will also implode, for reasons too long to list here and now.



Gingrich's tale of his fortune from Freddie Mac is laughable and would be a fitting topic for a major Ron Paul money bomb. If Paul goes head to head against Gingrich on the matter of Freddie Mac, Paul would win a first-round knockout.

