Ewa Michalak M Magique, stock Photo from website.

without cookies

without cookies

M Magique 65F without cookies

M Magique 65F with cookies

M Magique 65F without cookies

M Magique 65F with cookies





Ewa Michalak M Magique (798) 65F



* Stretched band length: 27.0in

* Band length: 22.0in

* Cup width: 5.5in

* Cup depth: 8.2in

* Wire length: 8.0in

* Cup separation: 0.8in

* Cup height: 5.5in

* Gore height: 1.6in

* Wing height: 3.3in

* Strap width: 0.5in

* Hooks: 2

















Pl Blekitna Rapsodia 65F











Pl Blekitna Rapsodia 65F



Ewa Michalak Pl Blekitna Rapsodia (658) 65F



* Stretched band length: 29.5in

* Band length: 23.0in

* Cup width: 5.3in

* Cup depth: 8.3in

* Wire length: 8.8in

* Cup separation: 0.6in

* Cup height: 5.8in

* Gore height: 1.8in

* Wing height: 3.5in

* Strap width: 0.6in

* Hooks: 2

I absolutely love the aesthetics of the M Magique . The band does run quite small, and I was aware since I bought it from another Bratabase user. However, I was really curious about the M cut and love the Magique anyhow, nothing an extender or 2 can't fix, and at least I didn't have to wait a month to see if it would even work.The bra fits me fairly well, both with and without the cookies. The cookies for this bra are a bit challenging to put in, they slide in through a small side pocket and you have to bend them a bit to squeeze them in. While it fits well both ways, with the pads gives some extreme cleavage (I will take some more photos with pads in once I dig them out of the bra drawer).The wires are a bit wide, but not excessively they are within the realm of what works for me at about 5.3in, and they are also quite short (about a 1.5cm shorter than than the PL ). The straps are still somewhat wide set like most EM's, but are narrower straps, which could be a pro or con depending on your preference, personally I think if they were wider they may be a bit irritating, but they do feel a bit flimsy (they are completely elastic), so you may need to adjust them a bit throughout the day, but they are easily adjustable. I measured the distances between straps on the M compared to PL's of the same size and they seem to be close if not the same depending on the PL.I think the primary difference between the PL and the M is the cup height with the M being about 2cm shorter than the PL. The gore is also a hair lower, but almost literally a hair lower, and the PL's range a bit in the ones I have from 1.75 to 2in while the M is 1.6in.If the PL works for you and you want lower coveage the M could also work if you are in the size range for the M (65AA-F and corresponding sister sizes including a standard 60 band). The cup depth seems to be mostly the same between the 3 PL's and the 1 M I have at about 8.25, with one PL measuring 8.5. You may want to size up in the band though, it is noted on EM's website that the band on the M runs small, since I only have one M I can't speak to how true that is across the line, but this one does fit more like a 60 than a 65.Here is a photo comparison between a PL and the M. Although I believe I am wearing the cookies in the PL, I will add some photos with cookies in the M when I can (ideally when I have some natural light). Despite cookies in one and not the other the cleavage looks similar probably because M is lower coverage, with cookies, it's almost too much, but good for special occasions. I am also able to wear a 65 band in the PL with no extender whereas in the M I have 2 extenders on. For reference I have a 30.5in ribcage, so I'm more between 30/32 bands.Update: Good news for those who don't fall into the size range of the M cut, Ewa has finally released the long awaited S Magique