Any six year old knows perfectly well if s/he is coerced while overpowered and threatened, or acts consensually out of free will.

Try to explain her/nim that the stupid adults have defined all sexual activity even of late 17 year or 15 year old adolescents as non-consensual. So it is the same "non-consensual rape" if a 17 year old takes the initiative to work hard to seduce an adult to have sex, or if the same adult rapes him/her at knifepoint.

The first example is "statutory rape" and the second is "forcible rape", the reader might retort. That differentiation has long been lost outside theoretical academic discussion.

The press happily reports about trials and conviction of "rapists" that raped the victim 300 times. No, she did not lock up the "victim" in a dungeon for years, like Mr. Fritzl. The victim came always came back for more, but did not consent (by our weird definition of legal consent). Human-Stupidity even documented a case where the rapist, unbeknownst to him, was duped by the victim into raping her.

Children of 6,8, or 15 years risk serious legal consequences, even jail, if they don’t know these confusing definitions and regulations. Therefore this ought to be be mandatory elementary school subject.

Human-Stupidity has repeatedly, assailed the tendency in modern law, incited by feminism, to "rape" and manipulate language, to use inaccurate and deliberately inflammatory, emotive language to try to foster a hidden agenda.

Due to feminist zeal to vilify consensual lovers of adolescent women, we belittle the true suffering of victims of forcible rape victims.

Human-Stupidity thinks it it truly offensive to the underage victims of real forcible violent rape to equate their suffering to the the "suffering" of willing participants in sex, to equate their resistance and unequivocal non-consent to the voluntary though legally invalid consent, or to the suddenly withdrawn consent in a "six second rape".

Minors under 18 (or 16) years of age can not consent to sex. When spoken by a minor under the age of consent, then by this definition, the following absurd equality holds.

"I love you, please make love to me" =

(is equal to) "NOOO, don’t touch me, leave me alone" =

Both statements above are non-consent of rape-victims, in case the birds are under the age of consent.

Human-Stupidity thinks that this language language manipulaton is an offense to our intellect, our language, our victims of forcible rape. A devious way to criminalize adolescent’s consensual sexuality without the masses noticing the plot.

Consent: the old fashioned meaning of consent for millennia, changed less then50 years ago

Strangely, our dictionaries haven’t caught up to the new legal and journalistic trends and still give old fashioned meanings of consent:

A surgeon must explain the significant risks of a procedure (those that might change the patient’s mind about whether or not to have it) before the patient can give binding consent. This was explored in Australia in Rogers v. Whitaker (1992) 175 CLR 479. If a surgeon does not explain a material risk that subsequently eventuates, then that is considered negligent.[3] These material risks include the loss of chance of a better result if a more experienced surgeon had performed the procedure[4]. en.Wikipedia.org/wiki/Consent

Definition of CONSENT | Merriam Webster 2consent noun 1 : compliance in or approval of what is done or proposed by another : acquiescence <he shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties — United States Constitution> 2: agreement as to action or opinion; specifically : voluntary agreement by a people to organize a civil society and give authority to the government See consent defined for English-language learners » Examples of CONSENT He did not give his consent for the use of his name in the advertisement. No one may use the vehicle without the consent of the owner.

Levels of consent

Now, cutting through the crap, let us be intelligent responsible honest adults who know how to precisely define language. Let us see a continuous scale of consent

more than consent: actively pursuing an issue even though the other party is reticent (this would be the case of an adolescent boy who incessantly pursues his adult teacher who initially resists his advances. To strengthen this even further, counselling, notary public and cool off period could be used, like in (2) ) informed clear knowing consent before witnesses, and a notary public. Consent repeated after counseling and a cool off period of a day for additional deliberation.

Human – stupidity suggests this as a solution to solve concerns about "non-consent" of minors, students, people in dependency and low power positions, etc. if feminists, the United Nations, and lawmakers were really concerned with the well-being off minors and people in week independent positions they would propose such a solution. This would be a much more democratic and free solution then denying the right to sex the entire classes of people, such as adolescent minors, mentally incapacitated, prisoners, dependence in low power positions. It just so happens that women tend to like older, more powerful man in the superior positions. informed clear knowing consent Consent that is clouded by light drunkenness or other impairments. (Especially if such impairment is clearly self inflicted and the consequences are foreseeable).

Human-Stupidity solution : we suggest that getting drunk should be illegal except when accompanied by a designated sober responsible adult, similar to the designated driver. That responsible adult would prevent not only drunken-and-later-regretted-sex, but also prevent drunken fights, drunk driving, drunk wife beating and other serious consequences of drunkenness. uninformed or misinformed consent: consent is based on lack of knowledge or false information (if ignorance or error were not provoked by manipulation of the other party) "No contest", neither consenting nor dissenting. Coyly saying no but really meaning yes. Feminists might be angry, but such resistance does exist, actually is even common. Sure, sometimes "no" really means "no", but this sometimes is hard to understand even for a well intended sensitive man Saying no and offering token resistance Active physical resistance repeatedly saying "no" and stating that there is no consent but no physical resistance. Active physical resistance repeatedly saying "no" and stating that there is no consent. Physical resistance, or presence of threat that prevents physical resistance)

.

Related