You think that others can morally make decisions about the appropriate use of the private property of another person.

So if someone smashes your car, the police and courts should not be involved in providing you redress because that would be interfering with your private property.

You hate greedy corporations, but think an organization such as the government - itself a greedy organization- will protect you from greedy corporations.

So there is no point in police or courts - part of the judicial system of government worrying about theft, fraud etc.

You think your neighbor, or some guy on the other side of town, should be restricted from owning a firearm, since he might be a psychopath, while simultaneously assuming that some other guy, who might be a psychopath, can be armed because a third guy or group of people - none of whom you have ever met - authorizes it.

You have a point; the mentally ill have a tough time. It would be statist to worry about allowing a psychopath to look after your children.

You think the moral nature of theft, murder, slavery, assault, and kidnapping change dependent upon the size of the group that authorizes these actions.

So citizens who pay their taxes to be protected by the police from murderers are fine with the Khmer Rouge?

You are scared of the idea of consenting adults engaging in free trade; especially if they are not taxed or regulated.

Fine by me; just don't go looking for any redress when you get your fingers burned.

You think it is morally justified to withhold trade with the people of a country - called an embargo or imposing sanctions - in order to blackmail the ostensible ruler(s) of that country to do your bidding.

Every individual has the choice whether to trade or not. When we elect representatives to a national assembly, we authorize them to make such decisions on behalf of our country. Forcing people to trade against their will is a bit statist, no?

You assert that guns cause crime, food causes obesity, schools cause education, or states create wealth.

Guns can indeed be used to commit crime. I've never heard anyone, not even a Breatharian, claim that food, per se, causes obesity. Education is generally what takes place in schools, so one could say that they cause people to become educated, yes. And states, under the right conditions, can create wealth; ask the Chinese and South Koreans.

You are not aware that most regulations are in place to protect existing companies from competition.

So that's why we have an elaborate legislative system designed to minimize monopoly and promote competition?

You claim separation of church and state, then vote for government to enforce your beliefs and values.

Democracy, like capitalism, is about the right to choose. It seems you have a problem with that.

You think charity only happens when the government gives money to poor people.

Show me someone who thinks that. And "charity" means "the voluntary giving of help to those in need."

You think that rules written by bureaucrats of the state can be used to control the state.

That's why we employ bureaucrats. We have three branches of government: legislative, judicial, and executive. Without them, there is no legislation and without legislation, there is no redress when people damage you, your family, or your stuff.

You think it's okay to give up some rights for security.

And what do you define as your "rights"? Yes, we surrender rights for our protection. But please, exercise your right to drink two bottles of whiskey and go for a long, long drive on the highway.

You believe that health care, education, housing, and food are rights.

Four Freedoms. Read them.

