3rd World Conference on Research Integrity. (2013). Montreal statement on research integrity in cross-boundary research collaborations. World Conferences on Research Integrity. Retrieved April 18, 2019, from https://wcrif.org/documents/354-montreal-statement-english/file.

Albert, T., & Wager, E. (2003). How to handle authorship disputes: A guide for new researchers. The COPE Report. https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2018.1.1.

American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Antes, A. L., English, T., Baldwin, K. A., & DuBois, J. M. (2018). The role of culture and acculturation in researchers’ perceptions of rules in science. Science and Engineering Ethics,24(2), 361–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9876-4.

Australian Research Council and Universities Australia. (2018). Australian code for responsible conduct of research. Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council.

Bavdekar, S. B. (2012). Authorship issues. Lung India: Official Organ of Indian Chest Society,29(1), 76–80. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-2113.92371.

Bennett, D. A. (2001). How can I deal with missing data in my study? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health,25(5), 464–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.2001.tb00294.x.

Bennett, D. M., & Taylor, D. M. (2003). Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers. Emergency Medicine,15(3), 263–270. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-2026.2003.00432.x.

Bhopal, R., Rankin, J., McColl, E., Thomas, L., Kaner, E., Stacy, R., et al. (1997). The vexed question of authorship: Views of researchers in a British medical faculty. British Medical Journal,314(7086), 1009–1012. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7086.1009.

Borenstein, J. (2011). Responsible authorship in engineering fields: An overview of current ethical challenges. Science and Engineering Ethics,17(2), 355–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9272-4.

Brown, C. E. (2016). Ethical issues when graduate students act as mentors. Ethics and Behavior,26(8), 688–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2016.1155151.

Chen, S., & Macfarlane, B. (2016). Academic integrity in China. In T. Bretag (Ed.), Handbook of academic integrity (pp. 99–105). Singapore: Springer.

Claxton, L. D. (2005). Scientific authorship: Part 2. History, recurring issues, practices, and guidelines. Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research,589(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2004.07.002.

Coakes, S., & Steed, L. (1997). SPSS analysis without anguish. New York, NY: Wiley.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Conley, D., & Stadmark, J. (2012). A call to commission more women writers. Nature,488, 590. https://doi.org/10.1038/488590a.

Costa, M. M., & Gatz, M. (1992). Determination of authorship credit in published dissertations. Psychological Science,3(6), 354–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00046.x.

Davis, M. S. (2003). The role of culture in research misconduct. Accountability in Research,10(3), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/714906092.

Delamont, S., Atkinson, P., & Parry, O. (1997). Critical mass and doctoral research: Reflections on the Harris report. Studies in Higher Education,22(3), 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079712331380926.

Fang, H. (2018). Normalized paper credit assignment: A solution for the ethical dilemma induced by multiple important authors. Science and Engineering Ethics,24(5), 1589–1601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9973-4.

Fernandes, J. M., & Monteiro, M. P. (2017). Evolution in the number of authors of computer science publications. Scientometrics,110(2), 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2214-9.

Flanagan, J. L. (2015). A comparison of the views of college of business deans and faculty on undeserved authorships. Journal of Education for Business,90(5), 241–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2015.1027163.

Flanagin, A., Carey, L. A., Fontanarosa, P. B., Phillips, S. G., Pace, B. P., Lundberg, G. D., et al. (1998). Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals. The Journal of the American Medical Association,280(3), 222–224. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.3.222.

Fong, E. A., & Wilhite, A. W. (2017). Authorship and citation manipulation in academic research. PLoS ONE,12(12), e0187394. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187394.

Fontelo, P., & Liu, F. (2018). A review of recent publication trends from top publishing countries. Systematic Reviews,7(1), 147. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0819-1.

Greenland, P., & Fontanarosa, P. B. (2012). Ending honorary authorship. Science,337(6098), 1019. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1224988.

Haug, C. J. (2015). Peer-review fraud—Hacking the scientific publication process. New England Journal of Medicine,373(25), 2393–2395. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1512330.

Henriksen, D. (2016). The rise in co-authorship in the social sciences (1980–2013). Scientometrics,107(2), 455–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1849-x.

Holman, L., Stuart-Fox, D., & Hauser, C. E. (2018). The gender gap in science: How long until women are equally represented? PLoS Biology,16(4), e2004956. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004956.

Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. (2018). IEEE Publication services and products board operations manual 2019. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Publications.

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2019). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. Retrieved January 1, 2020, from http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf.

Jagsi, R., Guancial, E. A., Worobey, C. C., Henault, L. E., Chang, Y., Starr, R., et al. (2006). The “gender gap” in authorship of academic medical literature—A 35-year perspective. New England Journal of Medicine,355(3), 281–287. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa053910.

Jones, A. H. (2003). Can authorship policies help prevent scientific misconduct? What role for scientific societies? Science and Engineering Ethics,9(2), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-003-0011-3.

Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika,39(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575.

Kennedy, P. (2002). Learning cultures and learning styles: Myth-understandings about adult (Hong Kong) Chinese learners. International Journal of Lifelong Education,21(5), 430–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370210156745.

Kennedy, M. S., Barnsteiner, J., & Daly, J. (2014). Honorary and ghost authorship in nursing publications. Journal of Nursing Scholarship,46(6), 416–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12093.

Larivière, V. (2012). On the shoulders of students? The contribution of Ph.D students to the advancement of knowledge. Scientometrics,90(2), 463–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0495-6.

Lawrence, P. A. (2002). Rank injustice: The misallocation of credit is endemic in science. Nature,415(6874), 835–836. https://doi.org/10.1038/415835a.

Li, E. Y., Liao, C. H., & Yen, H. R. (2013). Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective. Research Policy,42(9), 1515–1530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.012.

Liao, C. H. (2011). How to improve research quality? Examining the impacts of collaboration intensity and member diversity in collaboration networks. Scientometrics,86(3), 747–761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0309-2.

Logan, J. M., Bean, S. B., & Myers, A. E. (2017). Author contributions to ecological publications: What does it mean to be an author in modern ecological research? PLoS ONE,12(6), e0179956. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179956.

Macfarlane, B. (2017). The ethics of multiple authorship: Power, performativity and the gift economy. Studies in Higher Education,42(7), 1194–1210. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1085009.

Macfarlane, B., & Saitoh, Y. (2008). Research ethics in Japanese higher education: Faculty attitudes and cultural mediation. Journal of Academic Ethics,6(3), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-008-9065-9.

Marušić, A., Bošnjak, L., & Jerončić, A. (2011). A systematic review of research on the meaning, ethics and practices of authorship across scholarly disciplines. PLoS ONE,6(9), e23477. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023477.

Marušić, M., Božikov, J., Katavić, V., Hren, D., Kljaković-Gašpić, M., & Marušić, A. (2004). Authorship in a small medical journal: A study of contributorship statements by corresponding authors. Science and Engineering Ethics,10(3), 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-004-0007-7.

Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science,159(3810), 56–63.

Moody, J. (2004). The structure of a social science collaboration network: Disciplinary cohesion from 1963 to 1999. American Sociological Review,69(2), 213–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240406900204.

MOST (Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan). (2017). Academic ethics guidelines for researchers by the Ministry of Science and Technology. Retrieved January 1, 2020, from https://www.most.gov.tw/most/attachments/3d81520a-b403-4603-b8ef-b191c38ce80c?.

Murdock, J. L., Stipanovic, N., & Lucas, K. (2013). Fostering connections between graduate students and strengthening professional identity through co-mentoring. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling,41(5), 487–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2012.756972.

O’Brien, J., Baerlocher, M. O., Newton, M., Gautam, T., & Noble, J. (2009). Honorary coauthorship: Does it matter? Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal,60(5), 231–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carj.2009.09.001.

Oberlander, S. E., & Spencer, R. J. (2006). Graduate students and the culture of authorship. Ethics and Behavior,16(3), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327019eb1603_3.

Okike, K., Hug, K. T., Kocher, M. S., & Leopold, S. S. (2016). Single-blind vs double-blind peer review in the setting of author prestige. The Journal of the American Medical Association,316(12), 1315–1316. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.11014.

Olesen, A. P., Amin, L., & Mahadi, Z. (2018). In their own words: Research misconduct from the perspective of researchers in Malaysian universities. Science and Engineering Ethics,24(6), 1755–1776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9997-9.

Pan, S. J.-A., & Chou, C. (2015). Using a two-tier test to examine Taiwanese graduate students’ misunderstanding of responsible conduct of research. Ethics and Behavior,25(6), 500–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2014.987921.

Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS ONE,14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117.

Pickering, C., & Byrne, J. (2014). The benefits of publishing systematic quantitative literature reviews for Ph.D candidates and other early-career researchers. Higher Education Research & Development,33(3), 534–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.841651.

Pole, C. J., Sprokkereef, A., Burgess, R. G., & Lakin, E. (1997). Supervision of doctoral students in the natural sciences: Expectations and experiences. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,22(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293970220104.

Rajasekaran, S., Shan, R. L. P., & Finnoff, J. T. (2014). Honorary authorship: Frequency and associated factors in physical medicine and rehabilitation research articles. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation,95(3), 418–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2013.09.024.

Resnik, D., & Zeng, W. (2010). Research integrity in China: Problems and prospects. Developing World Bioethics,10(3), 164–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8847.2009.00263.x.

Roach, M., & Sauermann, H. (2017). The declining interest in an academic career. PLoS ONE,12(9), e0184130. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184130.

SAGE Publications. (2014). Retraction notice. Journal of Vibration and Control,20(10), 1601–1604. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546314541924.

Salita, J. T. (2010). Authorship practices in Asian cultures. The Write Stuff: The Journal of the European Medical Writers Association,19(1), 36–38.

Sandler, J. C., & Russell, B. L. (2005). Faculty-student collaborations: Ethics and satisfaction in authorship credit. Ethics and Behavior,15(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327019eb1501_5.

Slone, R. M. (1996). Coauthors’ contributions to major papers published in the AJR: Frequency of undeserved coauthorship. American Journal of Roentgenology,167(3), 571–579.

Smith, E., Williams-Jones, B., Master, Z., Larivière, V., Sugimoto, C. R., Paul-Hus, A., et al. (2019). Misconduct and misbehavior related to authorship disagreements in collaborative science. Science and Engineering Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00112-4.

Steele, L. M., Johnson, J. F., Watts, L. L., MacDougall, A. E., Mumford, M. D., Connelly, S., et al. (2016). A comparison of the effects of ethics training on international and US students. Science and Engineering Ethics,22(4), 1217–1244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9678-5.

Strange, K. (2008). Authorship: Why not just toss a coin? American Journal of Physiology - Cell Physiology,295(3), C567–C575. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00208.2008.

Street, J. M., Rogers, W. A., Israel, M., & Braunack-Mayer, A. J. (2010). Credit where credit is due? Regulation, research integrity and the attribution of authorship in the health sciences. Social Science and Medicine,70(9), 1458–1465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.013.

Tarkang, E. E., Kweku, M., & Zotor, F. B. (2017). Publication practices and responsible authorship: A review article. Journal of Public Health in Africa,8(1), 723. https://doi.org/10.4081/jphia.2017.723.

Taylor & Francis Group. (2017). Co-authorship in the humanities and social sciences: A global view. Retrieved November 15, 2018, from http://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Coauthorship-white-paper.pdf.

Van Noorden, R. (2018). Science in East Asia—By the numbers. Nature,558, 500–501. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-05505-2.

Wagner, C. S., Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). The continuing growth of global cooperation networks in research: A conundrum for national governments. PLoS ONE,10(7), e0131816. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131816.

Wang, J., Wang, G. G., Ruona, W. E. A., & Rojewski, J. W. (2005). Confucian values and the implications for international HRD. Human Resource Development International,8(3), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678860500143285.

Wennerås, C., & Wold, A. (1997). Nepotism and sexism in peer-review. Nature,387, 341. https://doi.org/10.1038/387341a0.

West, J. D., Jacquet, J., King, M. M., Correll, S. J., & Bergstrom, C. T. (2013). The role of gender in scholarly authorship. PLoS ONE,8(7), e66212. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066212.

Yukawa, Y., Kitanaka, C., & Yokoyama, M. (2014). Authorship practices in multi-authored papers in the natural sciences at Japanese universities. International Journal of Japanese Sociology,23(1), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijjs.12016.

Zhan, Y., & Wan, Z. H. (2016). Appreciated but constrained: Reflective practice of student teachers in learning communities in a Confucian heritage culture. Teaching in Higher Education,21(6), 669–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1183622.