Skip to comments.

Breaking=> Anon Twitter Acct White Rabbit Just Dropped 28,000 Hillary Private Emails Online

The Gateway Pundit ^ | July 10, 2017 | Jim Hoft

Posted on by bobsunshine

A mysterious IT specialist, who goes by the name The Forensicator, published a detailed report that appears to disprove the theory that the DNC was hacked by Russia.

The documents were copied on July 5th, five days before Seth Rich was murdered.

The Forensicator summarized the complex report into 10 bullet points.

The most important aspect about the report is the estimated speed of transfer (23 MB/s) at which the documents were copied. Its inconceivable DNC documents could have been copied at such speed from a remote location.......

This afternoon we received an email with the following message:

First, I must remain anonymous for now. I would like to forward links to files that were sent to President Trump this morning & may be a big smoking Gun re: DNC hack/Russia, etc. I am not the originator of these files and cannot vouch for their authenticity, just passing them along. They can be found here: https://twitter.com/W4BB17/status/884390817732984832

The tweet links to 28,882 Hillary Clinton emails in three different formats. We are currently analyzing this huge document dump.



(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...

TOPICS:

Front Page News

News/Current Events

KEYWORDS:

201607

20160705

clinton

dncleas

emails

forensicator

haxxx

hillary

hillaryclinton

hillaryemails

hillarysemails

nongovemails

whiterabbit

To: Jimmy The Snake

If we actually knew the Clintons might have us killed....



To: zeebee

My Comcast connection is over 120 mb/sec.

Why is 23 MB/sec so unreachable from a remote location? In order to download these emails they would have been uploaded at the same time. The upload speed is the hold up. The same thing happens here on FR. I have super fast download but the FR server is often slow.



To: bobsunshine

best election ever!



by 83 posted onby Rebelbase (Climate Change: The Imminent Crisis That Never Arrives and the gravy train that never ends.)

To: Andy from Chapel Hill

It looks like a Redact-A-Thon. Nothing during the attack, just the made up video excuse. This does not smell right. Too much missing. She wiped the server with a cloth and removed what she wanted.



by 84 posted onby luv2ndamend (Same party, different letter. When the shtf, hug a politician.)

To: Whenifhow

Downloaded. Lots to review. Two different download sites.



by 85 posted onby PA Engineer (Liberate America from the Occupation Media and Shariah Socialism.)

To: combat_boots

Hillary Non-Disclosure Agreement: https://foia.state.gov/searchapp/DOCUMENTS/HRC_NDAS/1/DOC_0C05833708/C05833708.pdf



To: All

Bump



by 87 posted onby Squidpup ("Fight the Good Fight of Faith")

To: bobsunshine

One Year Anniversary of the murder of Seth Rich..... July 10, 2016 to July 10, 2017...... a most interesting selection of date for this release!



by 88 posted onby Enchante (Searching throughout the country for one honest Democrat....)

To: PA Engineer





If locally downloaded at the DNC...... hmmmm... might be a RUSSIAN SPY:



by 89 posted onby Enchante (Searching throughout the country for one honest Democrat....)

To: Enchante

Looks like she needs those special “Awan Brothers” glasses to fix those eyes.



by 90 posted onby PA Engineer (Liberate America from the Occupation Media and Shariah Socialism.)

To: Jane Long

?

Did you mean:

To: bobsunshine; All

23MB/s is nothing, absolutely nothing unusual. I’m calling BS.



To: MNDude

Someone at the site commented that today is the one-year anniversary of the assassination of Seth rich. Isn’t THAT interesting!



To: Enchante

Thanks for making note of it...



To: Bogey78O

A modern Windows Exchange server can sustain 300mbs, minimum, across a 1gbs Internet circuit. And keep pumping data until there is none left. The initial surge would be at 1gbs for at least 10-15 seconds. This is nothing unusual.



To: PA Engineer; combat_boots; bobsunshine

It's time to revisit 18 U.S. Code 2071: Let's see if I understand this. . Hillary signed a nondisclosure agreement (see above) and then proceeded to give the whole world, through her unsecured server, our whole Federal Database? Multiple felonies with US Code 2071 alone along with the sixteen other Federal Laws broken by Hillary Clinton. When will the prosecutions begin? The whole Russia/Mueller Special Prosecutor thing is a huge smokescreen to keep Hillary, Huma, Lynch, Obama and the whole dem upper echelon out of jail! Shut down Mueller, appoint a Real Special Prosecutor and Start the prosecutions! Hey Jeff Sessions, where's the special prosecutor for Hillary? Grand Jury? This is absolutely ridiculous. We the People want you to shut down this Mueller waste of taxpayer money Trump/Russia nothing-burger. C'mon, show us what your made of. Your folks didn't name you Jefferson Beauregard Sessions for nothing!



To: PA Engineer; combat_boots

It's time to revisit 18 U.S. Code 2071: Let's see if I understand this. . Hillary signed a nondisclosure agreement and then proceeded to give the whole world, through her unsecured server, our whole Federal Database? Multiple felonies with US Code 2071 alone along with the sixteen other Federal Laws broken by Hillary Clinton. When will the prosecutions begin? The whole Russia/Mueller Special Prosecutor thing is a huge smokescreen to keep Hillary, Huma, Lynch, Obama and the whole dem upper echelon out of jail! Shut down Mueller, appoint a Real Special Prosecutor and Start the prosecutions! Hey Jeff Sessions, where's the special prosecutor for Hillary? Grand Jury? This is absolutely ridiculous. We the People want you to shut down this Mueller waste of taxpayer money Trump/Russia nothing-burger. C'mon, show us what your made of. Your folks didn't name you Jefferson Beauregard Sessions for nothing!



To: Jimmy The Snake

Putin wanted Russia to win. He was tired of being driver around in a 20 big black SUV caravan and wanted to go back to driving a Lada. Because that is what Trump’s energy policies are doing for him. I know that many FREEPERS have thought this since last year but what besides common sense being rare explains the paucity of this suggestion in the news? I’d suggest that the left merely has to suggest the possibility of something and everyone runs it without question. On the right, if you don’t have evidence that would hold up in court, you get attacked for even mentioning anything. Trump has experienced this already with the birth certificate debate. Anyone else have any theories as to why the common sense things like duh, intel has been politicized so maybe we question this? Or, humm, Clapper and Brenner are the main people saying this, and their credibility is on par with Susan Rice...huh. Or even TRUMP thought Hillary would win. Wonder how the Russians picked the winning side on this? Why is no one asking this? Here is my common sense argument to support this. ************************* Russia DID try to influence the election but they did so to help HILLARY get elected, not Trump. The people whom you have evidence of illegality on are the ones that you TRY to get elected. For example, China-Clinton. The Trump-Russian narrative doesnt support this. None of the deleted or damaging Hillary emails besides DNC or Podesta ones have surfaced suggesting people that have them like the FBI or enemies want to leverage them. Didnt she delete over 30,000 of them? I am going out on a limb her but I think Russia HAS these deleted emails. If they were trying to damage her, why didnt they leak them? But think of other Russian interests. They would like us to remove tactical nukes from Europe. They would like us to let the military deteriorate. They would like us to NOT develop our energy resources. A drop in oil price would have a massive impact on Russia economically. They would not want us to build up our military intelligence. They would not want us to develop our military technology. They would not want us to be secure from terrorist attacks. On each and every one of these issues, the candidate the Russians would NOT want to get elected would be Donald Trump. I think most people who believe this story was falsified by a politicized intel community instinctively know this, but I think it is worthwhile to state it unequivocally. Also, who do you think Russia thought would GET elected? Almost all news including Fox thought Hillary had an 85% or higher chance. Putin doesn’t have his own people taking polls so he relies on ours. Wouldn’t it make more sense to get the goods on her and wait until she is elected before rocking the boat? ***************************** Sorry if that last bit seems like a repeat. I’ve been posting this since the end of last year. I agree as soon as someone could point to a media source along this line of reasoning, I’ll apologize and cease and desist posting it....



by 98 posted onby ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton (Go Egypt on 0bama)

To: All

Sorry for the double post. System froze and I thought it didn't upload.



To: bobsunshine

Ping



Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

FreeRepublic , LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794

FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson