Let’s get the bare truth stated thoroughly, succinctly, and dispassionately, without bias or emotion, right at the outset, as will then be proven beyond any shade of doubt:

Islam is a totalitarian political nation-without-borders whose unquestionable, clearly stated goal is to overthrow all man-made nations on earth and replace them with a global theocracy known as a caliphate, and in doing so to eradicate all other religions and religious freedom. The fact that it has the metaphysical component of a self- proclaimed prophet who claimed to have spoken directly to an angel named Gabriel with messages to and from a god called Allah does not make it any less of a totalitarian political nation-without-borders whose expressly stated goal is to overthrow all man- made nations, and all other religions, and all rights to religious freedom on Earth.

If you, like John Locke, are ignorant of Islam, and if the only thing you know and believe about it is dishonest propaganda that Islam itself spreads through its own agents in governments and in the “mainstream” media, then the above incontrovertible facts may initially upset you or “trigger” you or hurt your feelings. If so, it’s not my intention or purpose to do so, but it is my intention and purpose to tell the facts about the subject, even if they aren’t pleasant, and I’m happy to share with you, below, information that has been willfully withheld from you by people who don’t have your best interests at heart. But if you’re ignorant of the facts, and also too stupid to get yourself adequately informed, then you’d do well to destroy this book [Created Equal: The Greatest Lie] and not read another word of it. If you go on with me from here, I’m about to prove what I just said above conclusively. If you go forward from this paragraph, there will be no going back. Your choice. Make it now.

To begin, this is an excerpt from a well-documented article by Vijay Kumar, “The Muslim Mosque: A State Within a State”:

The Kaaba in Mecca was not built as an Islamic Mosque. It was an ancient temple that had been shared by polytheists, Christians, Jews, and Hindus, honoring 360 different deities. In 630 A.D. the Kaaba was captured by Islam in its military invasion and conquest of Mecca.

On the day of its capture, Mohammed delivered an address at the Kaaba in military dress and helmet, according to Ayatullah Ja’far Subhani in his book, The Message:

“Bear in mind that every claim of privilege, whether that of blood or property is abolished … I reject all claims relating to life and property and all imaginary honors of the past, and declare them to be baseless … A Muslim is the brother of another Muslim and all the Muslims are brothers of one another and constitute one hand as against the non- Muslims. The blood of every one of them is equal to that of others and even the smallest among them can make a promise on behalf of others.” —Mohammed

According to Islam’s own officially approved biography of Mohammed (or Muhammad, or however you elect to spell the man’s name), he built an army as a robber baron attacking the rich caravans crossing the deserts from the East, and dividing the “booty” with his men—who all had to bow down to him as the self-proclaimed “prophet” of the new “religion” he had created. Mohammed had grown up in Mecca, but he began having “visions” and hearing voices, and behaving so peculiarly that he ultimately was forced to flee because of it.

In much the same way as he robbed the caravans, he took most of his new “religion” from the long-existing Judeo-Christian teachings—down to and including its god, Yahweh, who Mohammed renamed “Allah.” He also took from that religion the angel Gabriel, who Mohammed claimed came in private visits to him in a cave to deliver this new religion. He took Adam and Eve from the Judeo-Christian teachings, and even Jesus and Mary, redefining them in vastly different roles that fit his new religion. Not settling for that, he even took the very founder of the Judeo-Christian religions, Abraham, who Mohammed claimed had built the Kaaba (or Ka’bah, or however you choose to spell it) for the later benefit of Mohammed and his crew. Mohammed insisted that Adam first built it, then it was destroyed, then Abraham came along and rebuilt it, knowing, somehow, that Mohammed would come along later to own it.

So once Mohammed got a big enough army, he came back to Mecca, lied to the city fathers to get inside the gates, and exacted his revenge by personally destroying all the religious artifacts and idols of the Christians, Jews, and polytheists in the Kaaba. That’s when he made his militant and political speech quoted above.

_____________________________

Mohammed exacted his revenge by personally destroying all the religious artifacts and idols of the Christians, Jews, and polytheists in the Kaaba.

_____________________________

If you think that one word of the above is incorrect, then you don’t know Islam and its history, or the “official” biography of Mohammed. It’s all there, but it isn’t all going to be reprinted here. It’s easily available if you want to “fact-check” this.

First and foremost, after being a robber baron, Mohammed was a political dictator and military conqueror, who declared absolutely and unequivocally, once his invading army had conquered Mecca, that Islam was a military and political state without borders; that all Muslims anywhere in the world were united as “one hand against the non-Muslims;” and that the enemies of Islam until the end of time would be all non-Muslims, and all non-Islamic nation-states.

The very word “Islam” means, literally, “submission.” The very word “Muslim” means literally “one who submits.” This isn’t accidental; Mohammed was a warlord who wanted all the world to submit and bow down before him and his dogma.

The documentation on all the above is so overwhelming—for anyone who will open his eyes and look—that it takes a truly dedicated idiot even to attempt to contradict it. Here is just some of it, quoted directly from Islam’s own teachings and authorities:

The Believers are but a single brotherhood. —Quran 49:10

A Muslim has no nationality except his belief. —Syed Qutb

Islam wishes to destroy all states and governments anywhere on the face of the earth which are opposed to the ideology and program of Islam regardless of the country or the nation which rules it. The purpose of Islam is to set up a State on the basis of its own ideology and program. —Syed Abul A’ala Maududi

Islam does not recognize geographical boundaries, nor does it acknowledge racial and blood differences, considering all Muslims as one Umma [nation] … Every inch of land inhabited by Muslims is their fatherland. —Hasan al-Banna, founder of Muslim Brotherhood

All Muslims form a single nation. —Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran

The mosques are our barracks. And the believers our Army. –Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan

When you are called (by the Muslim ruler [Imam]) for fighting, go forth immediately. —Mohammed; Hadith, Bukhari 52:79; Narrated Ibn ‘Abbas

If the Imam calls a group of people to arms, they are obliged to join his military forces. —Ibn Qudama, al-Mughni

The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and [Allah’s] religion is made victorious over all other religions. —Muslim Brotherhood, “General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America”

Act like you are his friend. Then kill him. —Sheik Muburak Gilani, founder of Jamaat ul-Fuqra, explaining how to kill American infidels

Allah is our objective; the Quran is our constitution, the Prophet is our leader; Jihad is our way; and death for the sake of Allah is the highest of our aspirations. —Credo of the Muslim Brotherhood

If anyone desires a religion other than Islam (submission to Allah), never will it be accepted of him. —Quran 3:85

Fight and slay the unbelievers wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war). —Quran 9:5

There is a clear indication of the obligation to fight the People of the Book [Christians and Jews], and of the fact that God doubles the reward of those who fight them. Jihad is not against polytheists alone, but against all who do not embrace Islam. —Hasan al-Banna, founder of Muslim Brotherhood

We shall put yokes on the necks of the Unbelievers. —Quran 34:33

How blind or insane—or liberal, or conservative—do you have to be that you cannot see a deadly enemy, completely dedicated to your submission or death, staring you right in the face and telling you in the plainest possible language that he is going to dominate you and all of your nation, or is going to annihilate you? (Not literally “you,” dear reader; I know you’re smarter than that, or you wouldn’t still be reading.)

In light of the above, now read this chattering madness from Locke in his screed on “toleration”:

That church can have no right to be tolerated by the magistrate [government], which is constituted upon such a bottom, that all those who enter into it, do thereby ipso facto deliver themselves up to the protection and service of another prince. For by this means the magistrate would give way to the settling of a foreign jurisdiction in his own country, and suffer his own people to be listed, as it were, for soldiers against his own government.

A more exact description of Islam could hardly be made. Every mosque in the world, in every nation in the world, is precisely a foreign jurisdiction in that nation, and every person who attends a mosque in a non-Muslim nation becomes a soldier against his own government, ordered unequivocally by Islam, as quoted earlier, to fight if ordered by the Imam. Yet Locke specifically mandates “toleration” for the “Mahometans,” as he called Muslims.

It is inarguable that the Quran (or Koran, or Qu’ran, or however you want to spell it) is a political document. The Quran, along with the Sunnah—the habits and practices of Mohammed —is the constitution of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, which is the birthplace of Islam, and the Kaaba is, symbolically, the worldwide political seat of Islam. Every mosque in the world—which is a paramilitary and political outpost—has a visible indicator, the mihrab, that points toward the Kaaba, and all Muslims everywhere in the world must bow toward the Kaaba when in a mosque. That’s because it is the seat of their worldwide political nation—whether any one of them knows it or not. A very high percentage of so-called “Muslims” can’t read at all, and a higher percentage still cannot read Arabic, so the only thing they know about “Islam” is what they are told. Really, they are dilettantes, not true Muslims. The real Muslims, the ones who actually know and understand Islam, are invariably on a permanent jihad to overthrow all man- made nations and all other religions in the world, by any means. Period.

Islamic nations—the ones that already have been overwhelmed and overthrown by Islam in the past 1,400 years—have the Quran as an integral part of their political constitutions, and all Islamic nations forbid any civil law that goes counter to the Quran and Islam—and of course Islam includes Sharia law. Those nations include, e.g., Iran, Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Egypt, Syria, Libya, Palestine, Yemen, Algeria, Bahrain, Morocco, Somalia, and Malaysia.

Because Islam is a totalitarian political theocracy, Sharia law is civic law, in the fullest sense of the term, and wherever it takes the slightest toe-hold, it seeks to overthrow the man- made laws of that nation and supplant them with the Quran, the Sunnah, and Sharia law.

Any government on earth following the lunatic “toleration” mandates of John Locke, and thereby allowing Islam to plant its paramilitary outposts called “mosques” on its soil, is willfully exposing its citizens to an infiltration of an openly declared hostile force dedicated to the overthrow of that nation. Any government that would do that to its people is a government in treason to its citizens and to its mandate to protect their security. As things currently stand, that includes the United States.

The deadly poison in Locke’s dogma on “toleration” is that while he happily excludes atheists and Catholics from his “tolerating” largesse, he welcomes Islam with open arms, demonstrating his profound ignorance of it with every new statement:

Nobody is born a member of any church; otherwise the religion of parents would descend unto children by the same right of inheritance as their temporal estates, and everyone would hold his faith by the same tenure he does his lands, than which nothing can be imagined more absurd.

However “absurd” Locke thought that such an idea was, that’s the exact measure of his embarrassing ignorance of Islam. The website Islam Questions and Answers says unequivocally: “The child who is born to two Muslim parents is ruled to be a Muslim, according to scholarly consensus. If the parents have different religions, then the child follows the one who is Muslim, whether it is the father or the mother.” The website Islamweb puts it this way—and I wouldn’t wish to change a syllable of it:

The majority of Muslim scholars (Hanafis, Shaafi‘is and Hanbalis) maintained that the key factor in this regard is that either parent is Muslim, be it the mother or father; the children are then Muslims as a consequence of their Muslim parent, because Islam prevails and no other religion prevails over it, since it is the religion of Allah which He is pleased with for His slaves.

John Locke goes on in his blithering, blathering sermon on “toleration”:

Another more secret evil, but more dangerous to the commonwealth [government], is when men arrogate to themselves, and to those of their own sect, some peculiar prerogative covered over with a specious show of deceitful words, but in effect opposite to the civil rights of the community. For example: We cannot find any sect that teaches expressly and openly, that men are not obliged to keep their promise.

There, Locke all but brags about his ignorance of the Islamic doctrine of taqiyya: Lying to “infidels”—nonbelievers—is wholly acceptable in Islam as long as it forwards the cause of Islam. Mohammed famously said, “War is deceit,” and Mohammed is proclaimed to be the “perfect model” for all Muslims to follow. Oh, but Locke is by no means done dictating to everyone in the world what they need to “tolerate”:

No man by nature is bound unto any particular church or sect, but everyone joins himself voluntarily to that society in which he believes he has found that profession and worship which is truly acceptable to God. The hope of salvation, as it was the only cause of his entrance into that communion, so it can be the only reason of his stay there. For if afterwards he discover anything either erroneous in the doctrine or incongruous in the worship of that society to which he has joined himself, why should it not be as free for him to go out as it was to enter?

There’s Locke making a non-point with his endless flood of useless rhetorical questions. Well, of course it “should” be “free for him to go out”—in the case of an actual religion, rather than a political totalitarianism—but here we are discussing Islam, and there is no exit from Islam. Apostasy is a death sentence:

Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him.” —Mohammed; Hadith, Bukhari 84:57; Narrated ‘Ikrima

For Locke, though, it was too much trouble, apparently, to bother finding out what he was talking about, so he just rambled on, and on, and on, setting up anyone who fell for his lunacy to be infiltrated and overwhelmed and even slaughtered:

These, therefore, and the like, who attribute unto the faithful, religious, and orthodox, that is, in plain terms, unto themselves, any peculiar privilege or power above other mortals, in civil concernments; or who upon pretence [sic] of religion do challenge any manner of authority over such as are not associated with them in their ecclesiastical communion, I say these have no right to be tolerated by the magistrate; as neither those that will not own and teach the duty of tolerating all men in matters of mere religion. For what do all these and the like doctrines signify, but that they may and are ready upon any occasion to seize the Government and possess themselves of the estates and fortunes of their fellow subjects; and that they only ask leave to be tolerated by the magistrate so long until they find themselves strong enough to effect it?

John Locke just described Islam precisely with his rhetorical questions—oblivious throughout that he was describing Islam. For over 14 centuries Islam’s primary weapon against nation-states and civilizations and other religions has been infiltration and invasion by immigration, knowingly, willfully using the religious tolerance of the hosting nations to slowly take over, overthrow, and destroy the host nation and its culture. I’m going to quote here another passage by Vijay Kumar that is eloquently germane, this taken from his seminal tract called “Islam and the Divine Deception”:

There are parasitic plants, such as the Virginia Creeper and the Strangler Fig, that start out as almost imperceptible growths on their host plants or trees. They send their tendrils down into the soil to suck out the nutrients, and even tap into the very roots of the host. From their hosts, they derive protection and strength, as they grow rapidly to wrap their vines around the body of the host, and interleave their foliage with it in mockery of it. Eventually, they can choke the life out of the host. Where a Strangler Fig prevails, the tree inside it dies and rots, leaving the twisted, entangled vines of the living Strangler Fig standing alone as a new “tree.”

Such parasites never assimilate into the host; they stand apart, clinging to it, feeding off of it, taking its protection and nutrients—and smother the life out of it.

Islam never assimilates, either. It stands apart in a non-Islamic civilization, clinging to it, enjoying and profiting from the freedoms, riches, pleasures, and rights of that society until it can overcome and dominate it, no matter how long it takes, and supplant it with Islamic totalitarianism.

And that, precisely, is Islam and its divine deception: a covert paramilitary force that uniformly, for 1,400 years, has invaded nation after peaceful nation, often approaching not in war wear but in the robes of being a “religion,” willfully deceiving the kind and decent people who have reached out to welcome and succor it, the hosts then only to be betrayed, slaughtered, overwhelmed, and overthrown without mercy, their temples and their art and their civilization destroyed in exact compliance with the “prophet” that taught the marauding invaders to call their mission of war a “religion of peace” to better deceive the infidels.

John Locke was a blithering idiot who was so ignorant of Islam that he described it perfectly as the one type of “religion” that could not possibly be tolerated by any government, while in the same document said emphatically that Muslims must be tolerated by all governments.

This is the utter madness guiding most of the world’s governments and deliberative bodies today—including the United States and the United Nations, and courts around the world. Unless and until the remaining non-Islamic nations in the world, and all international political bodies such as the United Nations, name and deal with Islam for exactly what it is—a political entity—those nations and political bodies are willfully in treason to their constituents and citizens, and are knowingly, willfully putting their constituents and citizens at a high state of risk, while compromising their own very existence as a nation or political entity. To embrace and treat Islam as a “religion” is demonstrably cultural and national suicide. That has been proven conclusively by nations around the world for over 1,400 years.

NOTE: This is an excerpt from Ashton Gray’s revolutionary book on society, culture, history, and philosophy, Created Equal: The Greatest Lie, now on sale at Amazon, iBooks, Barnes & Noble, and other retailers. This is an excerpt from Chapter 9, “How Rights Go Wrong: Tolerating the Intolerable.”