atokenconservative

2018-06-04 22:59:49 -0400

Andrew “Pea Brain” Stephenson: I’m going to assume you’re being purposefully stupid. The comment clearly said “first” arrest, not the current one. At his first arrest there certainly were other reporters, and Tommy was indeed the only one arrested. At this arrest, there weren’t. You “seem” to be confused, but you’re smarter than that so I’m going to just say you’re simply full of shit. Now, as far as being coerced; he did ask for his own lawyer and was denied access to that person, instead forced to consult with a legal aid lawyer who just happened to be there. Right there, nothing that happens after that has any relevance and can be reported as being outside the law. He pled guilty, so he’s guilty, you assert? He didn’t plead anything, nothing that happened after he was denied legal counsel happened in the eyes of the law. Unless, of course, the law is being circumvented somehow. It’ll all be up to the high court some day but until then it’s fairly standard, black letter law. There’s also the allegation that the judge actually witnessed some of Tommy’s act on the sidewalk that day, which would automatically lead to a dismissal of that judge from acting as such in any legal proceeding involving Tommy, on that day, in that location. That’s 2 fairly solid legal arguments against this conviction and sentence actually being upheld. When this happens, can we count on Pea Brain to come on this site and admit he was wrong? I’ll do it if I’m proven wrong somehow, does Andrew have the ability?

commented