The 9/11 Minority Report PART 3



The CIA Myths

& the Reality

by Fintan Dunne, Editor, BreakForNews.com

20th December, 2005



URLs: BreakForNews.com/TheCIAInternetFakes-Part3.htm



This is a compilation from the research, writing and

audio o n BreakForNews over the last year. It brings

together the key themes we have explored as we

developed the case on the CIA Internet Fakes.



It's trimmed to the minimum so that those not familiar

with our analysis have a comprehensive overview that

shows a flavor of what has really been going on.

--Fintan Dunne



THIS IS A DRAFT VERSION. EXPECT A TIGHTER EDIT OVER THE NEXT FEW DAYS.





A: THE CIA MYTHS



An alternative media article about 9/11 from The San Francisco Bay Guardian, which went beyond the usual knee-jerk 'conspiracy nuts' angle, noted that:

"As the public reached its pinnacle of being open to considering alternative views of 9/11, the truth movement fractured into disparate subgroups, each pushing its own pet theories, torn by internal divisions over strategy, and unable to mount a cohesive strategy that would break through the din of election-year politics. This fracturing was, of course delberately engineered by the disinfo agents in the 9/11 movement. Indeed, the 'splits' were a carefully planned and integral part of the coverup from the start. The establishment has been actively 'managing' the 9/11 skeptics all the while -with a focussed plan which relied opon the guaranteed reelection of G.W. Bush.



A 9/11 movement was inevitable. When it arose, the establishment was there in advance, waiting for it with open arms. Many genuine people play key roles in the 9/11 movement, but are outnumbered by the operatives. 'Management' of the aftermath was always integral to the plot, and was likely resourced more heavily than the attack scenario itself.



Another part of the gameplan was to start with a reasonably sensible 9/11 movement. But they don't want a functioning 9/11 movement around forever.



The longer-term idea was to have the whole host of investigators and activist leaders take each other out, and thus run the movement into the ground.



If you remember back, Ruppert was to first to bite the dust, in a controversy over his promotion of the Peak Oil issue (a pro-nuclear power psyop]. Now, that was no accident. Ruppert was/is disposable. You see, they all are.



The next pre-planned outing was John Gray of 911Truth.org -whom Daniel Hopsicker linked to funding by arms dealer, Adnan Kashoggi. Once again -no accident. Build up 'heroes' of the 9/11 issue. Then later expose their deliberate flaws to cause their supporters to loose heart.



About a year ahead of the Kerry presidential bid 'defeat', they began a slow escalation of the process of undermining their collective credibility.



Also note when the official 9/11 report was released. This was timed so that activists would be busy with opposition to the Iraq War and the forthcoming Kerry presidential bid. But, the big idea was that the 'defeat' of Kerry would be the final blow to 9/11 activists already reeling from seeing their heroes' feet of clay --as exposed by all the 9/11 flame wars.



Furthermore, as soon as Kerry was 'defeated', left-wing activists were soon chasing their tails about the stolen election. So, by the time that was all over, the 9/11 issue was firmly on the back-burner.





SELF-DESTRUCTING FAKES



Remember back in the summer of 2004. Everybody Knew Bush was going down. Despite the official polls, true sentiment in the U.S. was running 60:40 against the president. Actual votes on the day were likely to run around Kerry 55/Bush 45.



Nobody expected Karl Rove to take this lying down, so when pundits predicted he was about to stage the 'capture' of Osama, or was plotting a fake terrorism attack to boost Bush, it seemed credible.



This perception was reinforced by the like of Wayne Madsen's confidential 'sources', who in the closing stages of the election campaign reported that the terror strike was imminent.



It never happened. The elite didn't ensure Bush's reelection by means of a fake terror strike.



They stole the election instead. As they had always planned to do. While carefully misdirecting us to look elsewhere during the run up. Now that's good quality disinformation. Notice the emotional surface appeal of the terror attack spin. Always the appeal to the emotions -to get reason looking the other way.



And when we finally realized that ballots -not bullets- were the KO punch, leading election fraud activist Bev Harris of BlackBoxVoting.org staged her own spectacular self-destruction on Air America's Randi Rhodes show. Just to make sure your votefraud outrage was axed by one of it's 'leaders'.



Just to make sure you could blame Bev when nothing happened about the stolen election. Another convenient scapegoat -just like Kerry. All of which disillusioning of opposition comes copyright COINTELPRO, 2004 via Air America, MSNBC and the Green Party's David Cobb Democracy Memorial Fund.



But, hey! Bev looked good for a while there. As did MSNBC Countdown's Keith Olberman -stolen election hero of the left- while he helped box a national controversy into 20 minute slots on liberal cable. Yeah that was a breakthrough, wasn't it? NOT.





TABLOID FAKES



The next phase of the plan was for those who started out making some sense on the 9/11 issue to get more and more shoddy; more hysterical in tone; and slowly turn into virtual carricatures of 'conspiracy nuts'.



Satanic rituals( Alex Jones), Homosexuality and child prostitution have already emerged as key themes(Jeff Gannon). All this happens slowly. But the whole effect is rather seedy. It's meant to be.



Who can forget GannonGate: a mutedly salacious gay version of MonicaGate. The sex scandal rocked the Blogsphere -conveniently giving investigative blogs a discrediting tabloid sheen in the process.



The GannonGate team accelerated a planned downmarket shift into the cosy, elite-funded internet conspiracy market. Where GannonGate had to compete with Peak Oil, imminent asteroid impacts, earthchanges, alien abductions, and other fantasies designed to give 'conspiracy theory' a bad name.



The wild spin was that Gannon is actually Johnny Gosh -kidnapped as a child and used as a plaything of Washington politicians. An affidavit in a lawsuit was used as part of 'evidence' that a "vast network of children [was] trained to work for the government and participate in deviant sexual acts to make the blackmail of politicians possible." It's National Enquirer material.



The same applies to the story of Clint Curtis and Florida Republican Tom Feeney. Wayne Madsen's active here again -moving from predicting the 'terror strike' that never happened, to helping to launch this account of a computer vote-stealing plot in Florida. Bradblog is a key vehicle for the Feeney tale, and a tame mainstream hack has recently been wheeled in to try kickstart some interest in the story.



None of these internet sensations will ever discomfort the mainstream. They, and a plethora of similar spins are intended to waste your time and divert your energy as surely as the Osama no-show terror attack.



A fake alternative media unable to champion the real issues, is in continual desperate need of half-plausible-sounding drivel to fill the pages and try divert from real alternative news.



The Orwellian news managers have the market beautifully segmented by see-no-evil Chinese walls, which allow the manufacture of crude opinion zones: Fox News fanaticism; gun-totin' Patriots; Mainstream myopia; Soros-funded MoveOn; Deaniac Dems; the Green Gremlins; CounterPunching Lefties; 9/11 Truthers; God-dammed Communists; and End of the Worlders.



The information war boys have a gambit for each of those markets. And they have a wide range of specialist media fronts, well placed to roll out these ploys. It must cost a bundle, but hey, your taxes pay for it all anyway.



That's the difference between BreakForNews.com and this host of 'alternative' websites and radio feeds carrying a diet of information, rich in subtle (and not subtle enough) disinformation. We don't have their kind of reach or that level of unlimited budget for unprincipled bullshit.



Yeah, Jeff Gannon was leading to the inevitable downfall of Karl Rove. Just like that terror attack in October '04 which got Bush releected.





FAKES TO CONFUSE



In one fell swoop Sibel Edmonds offloaded blame from the CIA --and spread it across the FBI, the State Department; an unnamed (i.e. Mossad) foreign intelligence operation; and a non-terrorist criminal network.



Quite a feat.



Soon, from miles away in Florida, Daniel Hopsicker, with help from Atta's girlfriend Amanda Keller was insisting that Edmonds' story dovetailed with his discoveries of a drug network linked to 9/11. His list of Florida-based villians is as exhaustive as that of the dynamic duo in D.C..



One big corner of that overall 9/11 picture is formed by four disparate-seeming individuals: a veteran whistleblower, an attractive novice whistleblower, a campaigning journalist and a reputed lingerie model; jigsaw peices called Ellsberg, Edmonds, Hopsicker and Keller. Ellsberg supports Edmonds, confirmed by Hopsicker --backed by eyewitness accounts from Keller. But they're all telling different flavors of the same story.



To specify which story that is, let's take a look at the popular tales of 9/11. The notorious main division is between LIHOP and MIHOP. But it's much more detailed than that. Explanations come in a full range of flavors --starting with the official story:



A. Official story:

CIA/FBI were incompetent; Bush and/or Clinton were complacent. B. Official Lame Conspiracy :

CIA/FBI were incompetent; Bush/Cheney maybe let it happen; Israelis Knew. C. Official LIHOP Conspiracy :

CIA/FBI were compromised; Bush/Cheney did let it happen; Israelis Helped. D. Official LIHOP Wild Conspiracy :

CIA/FBI compromised; Bush/Cheney/Neocons let it happen; Israelis Did It. E. Official LIHOP Tinfoil Conspiracy :

Israelis/Neocons/Bush/Cheney Did It; CIA/FBI looked the other way. F. Official MIHOP 'Serious' Conspiracy :

Israelis/Neocons/CIA/FBI/Bush/Cheney/Military-Industrial-Complex Did It. G. Official Loony Conspiracies :

Rothschilds and/or Rockefellers and/or CFR and/or Bildebergers did it.

Jews and Jewish bankers -who already run everything- did it.

Satanists, Opus Dei or Reptilians did it. It's a terrific variety of theories.

It plays out something like this:

The mainstream media push version A; hint at B; sneer at G.

The controlled right/intellectual media pushes version B.

The controlled left/intellectual media pushes version C.

The 'moderate' Fake internet sites push versions C and D.

The 'softcore' Fake internet sites push versions D and E.

The 'independent' Fake internet sites push version F.

The 'loony' Fake interent sites push variations of version G. But every single one, from A to G are OFFICIAL versions, sanctioned and promoted by the 9/11 intelligence coverup operation and their CIA Fakes network. They have a flavor for every market.



The creation of this multiplicity of explanations is a core element of the coverup. Left to their own devices, people on the Internet might have figured out the truth themselves. But with this circus in action, there is always plenty of distraction and lots of division in opinion.



The intelligence coverup is not trying to stop 9/11 conspiracy theories on the internet. It's creating them. Then playing off supporters of the different theories against each other. That's a classic Cointelpro-style tactic.



The perpetrators knew that a sizeable segment of people were going to be pretty sure 9/11 was not as it seems. They don't mind that, for now. The immediate objectives are first, to to stop these skeptical views from gaining hold in mainstream opinion. Second, to prevent a coherent view forming which could convince a much broader number of people -particularly those on the political left.



Antiwar.com columnist Justin Raimondo, is as ever pushing the "Israelis Knew/Did It" angle on 9/11. Many other CIA Fakes are heavily promoting this line, because it's a key part of what the coverup hopes will forever be the main vaguely-hinted, but unproven conspiracy theory on 9/11: Bush, Cheney, and Mossad let it happen on purpose.





FAKES AS DECOYS



Atta, Atta, Atta, Atta, Atta.



Each new " question " raised about Atta is designed to relentlessly focus on the official patsy. But you're supposed to think these are "breakthroughs" by the CIA Fake conspiracy sites.



The 9/11 perpetrators carefully designed this wild back-story for Atta in every detail, but you are not supposed to figure that out. It's all thousands of miles from the major crime scene at the WTC, but then this is hamburger-style conspiracy marketing. Grab an Atta McWhopper.



Many of the Fakes are running the Able Danger story about a secret intelligence unit which had identified Atta either in 2000, or in late 1999 -while Clinton was still running things. The spin is that this shows how fraudulent is the Bush administration official line on Atta. As usual, it sounds promising on first sight. It's Bush's fault.



But, puzzlingly, Rush Limbaugh, Newsmax and other right-wing media are running the same story. But their take is that the Clinton Justice Department leaned on the DIA to squelch the report. So it's Clinton's fault.



More spin alleges that the CIA knew but never told the 9/11 Commission, and that a culture of "obstructionism" still prevails in the agency. So it's the CIA's fault.



Also doing the rounds, is the account of a "suspicious" visit by Atta to a gambling ship owned by Republican money-man, Jack Abramoff. All that is being loosely connected to Al-Qaida drug dealing and money laundering. So it's the Saudi's fault.



And all the while, as Sibel Edmonds implies, it's the FBI's fault and the Israeli's fault.



Amazing, isn't it, that one story can be spun so many different directions.



Everything "discovered" about Mohammed Atta was planned. Atta-Boy's job was to smear a false trail of associations all over the Florida landscape.



But when it comes down to it, it's all LIHOP. Bush/Cheney had the motive and let it happen on purpose. Throw in Al-Qaida, some drugs, a few Republicans and Saudis . Now you have means and opportunity. The LIHOP is complete. So, let's drop the BS.



The CIA-backed "conspiracy theory" features scapegoats GWB and Cheney, whose LIHOP sins will remain forever unproven, but deeply suspected.



Their official conspiracy theory diversion patsy is as pervasive as Mickey Mouse: the over-the-top, tabloid Atta.



The hazy connections supposedly run to the drugs trade, Jeb Bush, the Saudis and of course the Zionist Mossad [who are reputedly cunning in the extreme, but somehow also so dumb that they leave a wide trail of incompetent operatives arrested nationwide in suspicious circumstances].



In other words, the government-sponsored 9/11 conspiracy theory is a masterpiece of loose innuendo designed to appeal to many target markets. From MadCowProd to Newsmax to Time magazine.



Same story, same actors, different spins. Cute.





FAKES TO DISCREDIT



All this keeps everybody real busy. Always a new "breakthrough" on the CIA Fake sites.



Like when radio host, Alex Jones ran overblown claims linking Peter Power, a crisis management consultant and former member of Britain's anti-terror police, to a 'terrorism drill' which Jones alleges was used to provide cover for State perpetrators of the multiple London bombs.



The weekend article



They claimed that in a BBC Radio 5 interview on July 7th, Peter Power admitted that his Visor Consulting firm: " was running a 1,000 person strong exercise which drilled the London Underground being bombed at the exact same locations, at the exact same times, as happened in real life. "



The article went on to claim that the Visor Consulting drill: " acts as a cover for the small compartamentalized government terrorists to carry out their operation without the larger security services becoming aware of what they're doing, and, more importantly, if they get caught during the attack or after with any incriminating evidence they can just claim that they were just taking part in the exercise. "



In fact, Power's consultancy firm was running a small "corporate wargame" drill for the management team of a British company which had 1,000 employees. mp3 Audio] size of the company whose managers were being drilled - and not to the number of participants in the drill.



The London corporate drill was just a glorified administration seminar where managers get to use security buzzwords --while seated around an office table guessing how they would respond to loss of available staff for call centers, power outages, or travel restrictions, etc..



The hype, was subsequently used to laugh off critics of the official line on both the 9/11 attacks and the London bombings. The article turned all skeptics into tinfoil hat fodder. The whole thing was deliberate decoy designed to allow mainstream media to later ridicule 'conspiracy theories' which turn out to be untrue.



U.K. TV Channel 4 is used the Alex Jones' article to sneer at bloggers and alternative media. News reporter JJ King wrote:

Prison Planet, in an article entitled 'London Underground Bombing "Exercises" argued that the simulated attacks were, whether Power knew it or not, intended to act as a cover for the real ones. News agency Al Jazeera agreed, baldly asserting that 'The London Underground exercises were used as the fallback cover to carry out the attack.'

King then quoted my article debunking Jones (which I knew the mainstream probably would do, but I had to try prevent alternative media walking wholesale into the setup.)

In fact, the 'exercises' he spoke of on Five Live were carried out purely 'on paper', or at least PowerPoint, by a small group of seven or eight executives..." As Fintan Dunne, editor of BreakForNews.com points out , 'these types of private-sector "risk management" drills never use field staff. What was galling was that the London bombs black op was full of holes, but that information sort of got lost as the sensational claims fall flat. [more]





FAKES AS DIVERSIONS



Not only can the CIA Fakes be used to decoy away from such operations, they are also useful to create complete diversions, which contain misleading spin.



Like when Seymour Hersh "uncovered" information about Bush plans to attack Iran.



Back in January, 2005 Hersh kicked off with his article ' The Coming Wars '. Then Scott Ritter fanned the flames in April with his prediction on disinfo site AlJazeera.com that by June, 2005 the U.S. was set to invade Iran. On Counterpunch.org, Gary Leupp told us that "Reports about the recent flurry of Iran-Iraq diplomacy must shock the neocons."



A reality check would have revealed that the U.S. was logistically, militarily and politically sinking in the mire in Iraq -thus in no position to take on any new adventures. It was laughable then, to see the Seymour Hersh 'exclusive' marketed to public opinion in the U.S. -like it was a real discovery of secret Bush plans. It was downright side-splitting to see a raft of gullible/useful left-wing commentators promoting this lie.



Could Hersh really be so dumb as to fail to see he was being used? Was eyeryone else just as credulous? Or is it just that the CIA hacks outnumber semi-journalists by enough to guarantee these disinformation campaigns will always work?



Why do you think that there is no trouble in the Tehran-dominated Shia south of Iraq? Why do you think the U.S. invaded Iraq in the first place? Because they knew there would be no problem in the south. That's why the British got the easy job of occupying the region --while the GI's were sent north to demolish the Sunni, who were the real target of the invasion.



Yes, there were a few hotheads in the south, but nothing the combined wits of Sistani and Al-Sadr couldn't carefully defuse with the help of some well-timed, persuasive, military muscle from their friends in high places. Our high places.



The Iraqi Shia leadership have been in the bag from the get-go.

Because the Iranians are U.S./British/French tools in the region for a long, long time. The British and the French have been in on the whole Iranian revolution from the start. In the 1970's, Ayatollah Khomeini wasn't staying in Paris to see the nice pictures in the Louvre.



Our boys run Iran like they used to run the old Iraq -by means of intelligence-controlled

stooges. That's why it was so easy to arrange the Iran-Iraq war.





FAKES AS FLIMSY TINFOIL



We did a radio show about WingTV [ mp3 ]



That kind of association gives 9/11 research a big image problem. One that serves to discredit the whole movement. By accident or design.



It gets worse.



Another 'champion' on the 9/11 issue is Jim Marrs, who has written and spoken on the subject a great deal. Which means that this lecture booking of his has similiar troubling associations:

The Earth Revelations 2012 Series

Join Tricia McCannon, internationally known author, speaker and Founder of the UFO Forum as she kicks off a phenomenal 13-week audio visual series on Star Gates, UFOs, DNA Activations, Alien Visitation , Prophecies, Revelations and Planetary Awakening.



WEEK THREE: Gorgio Bongiovanni - An Italian Peacemaker and Contactee with the full Stigmata reveals the appearance of Mary the Mother in broad daylight that blasted him with light for the first of the signs of the full Stigmata.



WEEK FIVE: Jim Marrs , Investigative Reporter and author of " Alien Agenda ," and "Ruled by Secrecy"  Speaking on " Inside Job - Unmasking the 9-11 Conspiracies " Now, when you and I say that 9/11 was an inside job, we mean that political forces were behind the attacks. But the company that ace reporter Marrs keeps is disastrous for any credible questioning.



Yeah, maybe the Virgin Mary secretly arranged for aliens to carry out the attacks. Marrs has been on leading 'investigative' shows like Coast to Coast and Jeff Rense. Once Rense had David Booth on a number of times about an asteroid that was goning to destroy half of America when it hit. Never happened. But you can't be too careful.



In the world of the CIA Myths, 9/11 was a Bush/Cheney rogue cabal plot. But the trail is confused and hopelessly compromised by deliberate ineptitude of research and analysis.



Or then again, maybe the aliens did it.



