There is only one way to remove a freedom belonging to the people. That is by a YOU knowingly waiving a particular freedom. Some of the confusion in our present system has arisen because many millions of people have waived their freedom to travel unrestricted, forage for food, build a home and other basic fundamental freedoms and opted into the jurisdiction of the state. Those who have knowingly given up these freedoms are legally regulated by state law, and must obtain permits, registrations, insurance, etc. State statutes and codes apply only to those who waive their freedom under contracts like the drivers license, social security card, or birth certificate and consent / contract with the state or federal government.



“It has come to my attention that numerous individuals in our state have rescinded all of their contracts with the united states federal government, the state of [], and each of its political subdivisions. – I urge you to inform yourself and your personnel of the contractual nature of auto registration and driver’s licenses, it is conceivable that this situation may lead to confrontation between these individuals and law enFORCEment personnel. In so much as this procedure is entirely appropriate”



Basic Law:

Without a valid “cause of action” there’s no corpus delicti. If there’s no corpus delicti a case has no standing. There are numerous cases dealing with corpus delicti and all say the same thing. Without a corpus delicti the plaintiff has no standing. In order to have a corpus delicti a case requires a valid “cause of action.” A valid cause of action requires three elements.



The Three Elements Are:

1) a violation of a legal right, 2) damage or injury, 3) redress-ability by the court.



Layman’s Terms (No Victim, No Crime):

The “government” “state” or “county” cannot be a victim. A policy enFORCEment officer is actually committing perjury by claiming the “government” “state” or “county” is a victim of a crime especially in instances like a speeding ticket or seat belt ticket, which is actually racketeering and operating as a criminal enterprise under the color of law. To bring about a valid cause of action, the three elements must be met and the only way this can happen is if there is an actual victim. IE: Violence, theft, kidnapping, extortion, racketeering, each one of these have an actual victim.



Not wearing your seat belt has no victim. Spare the Argumentum ad Passiones (Appeal to Passion or Emotion), there is no victim of a crime if I do not wear my seat belt. Therefor any cause of action pushed by a policy enFORCEment officer is a lie, therefor perjury. There is no victim therefor he can NOT meet the 3 elements for the cause of action. He is lying for the “government” “state” or “county” to generate revenue and if you don’t comply you are met with force, violence, theft of car (tow), kidnapping (false arrest), ect. By definition, this is perjury, racketeering, extortion ect. A real crime.



These are the main arguments used by your local police, district attorneys, judges, and city councils, as well as federal government to get you to adhere to their codes, regulations, and “authority”.



Argumentum ad Verecundiam (Appeal to Authority):

Is a logical fallacy that argues that a position is true or more likely to be true because an authority or authorities agree with it.



Argumentum ad Nauseam (Appeal to Repetition):

Is the logical fallacy that something becomes true if it is repeated often enough. An ad nauseam argument that can be easily shown to be false leads to the “point refuted a thousand times”.



Argumentum ad Populum (Appeal to the Masses):

Is a fallacious argument that concludes that a proposition is true because many or most people believe it: “If many believe so, it is so.”



Argumentum ad Baculum (Fear of Force):

The fallacy committed when one appeals to force or the threat of force to bring about the acceptance of a conclusion.



Argumentum ad Passiones (Appeal to Passion or Emotion):

A logical fallacy in which the speaker manipulates the recipient’s emotions in order to win an argument, especially in the absence of factual evidence.



Argumentum ad Temperantiam (Appeal to Middle Ground):

Is an informal fallacy which asserts that the truth can be found as a compromise between two opposite positions.



Ignoratio Elenchi (Appeal to Delusions – Manipulation):

Is an informal fallacy of presenting an argument that may or may not be logically valid, but fails nonetheless to address the issue in question. More colloquially, it is also known as missing the point.





“In the end, there is no hope for freedom if men of the mind are not willing to truly stand for freedom, to make of themselves Gibraltar-like representatives of its attributes no matter what level of rejection, calumny and injustice is heaped upon them. This is the true role of the intellectual in history, his only role – to stand intransigently for truth and its concomitant of freedom, even in face of a vast social herd of academic pedants, poseurs, and media clowns stampeding the other way. – Nelson Hultberg”







Legal and History Archives: