

The editorial board of Jeff Bezos' blog penned a column attacking the media for its "out of control" coverage of Hillary Clinton's "minor email scandal."



According to the Bezos bloggers, the media should stop talking about it because there's more "important issues" like "China's aggressive moves in the South China Sea" and "military spending."



After all, they say, she "admitted [it] was a mistake."



From Washington Post:

JUDGING BY the amount of time NBC's Matt Lauer spent pressing Hillary Clinton on her emails during Wednesday's national security presidential forum, one would think that her homebrew server was one of the most important issues facing the country this election. It is not. There are a thousand other substantive issues -- from China's aggressive moves in the South China Sea to National Security Agency intelligence-gathering to military spending -- that would have revealed more about what the candidates know and how they would govern. Instead, these did not even get mentioned in the first of 5½ precious prime-time hours the two candidates will share before Election Day, while emails took up a third of Ms. Clinton's time.



Trump is winning so hard he literally has the lying media attacking one another and crying they're not being biased enough against him!

Sadly, Mr. Lauer's widely panned handling of the candidate forum was not an aberration. Judging by polls showing that voters trust Mr. Trump more than Ms. Clinton, as well as other evidence, it reflects a common shorthand for this election articulated by NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick last week: "You have Donald Trump, who's openly racist," he said. Then, of Ms. Clinton: "I mean, we have a presidential candidate who's deleted emails and done things illegally and is a presidential candidate. That doesn't make sense to me, because if that was any other person, you'd be in prison."



In fact, Ms. Clinton’s emails have endured much more scrutiny than an ordinary person’s would have, and the criminal case against her was so thin that charging her would have been to treat her very differently. They go on to provide a bunch of excuses as to why she's completely innocent and pure as the driven snow.



"Anyone who claims that Ms. Clinton should be in prison accuses, without evidence, the FBI of corruption or flagrant incompetence," they say.





Ignore this.

Here's their closer:

Imagine how history would judge today’s Americans if, looking back at this election, the record showed that voters empowered a dangerous man because of . . . a minor email scandal. There is no equivalence between Ms. Clinton’s wrongs and Mr. Trump’s manifest unfitness for office. There's no equivalence between Donald Trump's hurting peoples' feelings with "mean words" and Hillary Clinton's manifest unfitness for office due to her endless corruption.







Follow InformationLiberation on Twitter and Facebook.







