Most people will aware that there is occasionally debate about immigration within the mass media, but few will be aware of the way in which this debate is carefully controlled in order to dissipate any impact it may have upon the public consciousness.

The discussion which took place on BBCs Question Time on 17th January this year is a typical example of the kind of sanitised and neutered debate that is allowed.

Question Time viewers will have witnessed a British woman, Rachel Bull take issue with liberal academic, Mary Beard (both pictured above) over the impact of immigration on the market town of Boston in Lincolnshire.

After hearing Cambridge University professor Mary Beard airily dismissing claims that migrant workers were overwhelming the town, office manager Mrs Bull is reported to have almost leapt from her seat, waving her hand frantically in the air until she caught the attention of presenter David Dimbleby.

“Boston is at breaking point,” she said, “all the locals can’t cope any more.”

“You go down to Boston High Street and it’s just like you’re in a foreign country. It’s got to stop. The services are at breaking point.

When Mrs Bull finished speaking, her words were enthusiastically applauded by the studio audience and Mrs Bull was prominently reported in the press in the days that followed, as this report from the Daily Mail testifies.

Furthermore, just two weeks later, following reports from the 2011 Census for England and Wales that Polish is now the second most widely spoken language in Britain, the issue of immigration was again discussed by the Question Time panel, with much of the debate focusing on the anticipate flood of EU immigrants from Rumania and Bulgaria once restrictions are lifted in January 2014.

So what is sanitised about the debate taking place here?

The sanitised aspect of this debate is that the focus in these and an overwhelming proportion of all mainstream debate about immigration in recent times has focused on immigration from Eastern European countries, where the immigrants are White.

We are permitted and to some extent encouraged to express antipathy towards immigration when the immigrants are White people, but discouraged when they happen to be of an alien race or ethnicity, and this is completely illogical.

Immigrants from Poland for example, do present British workers with competition for jobs, coming as they do from a country in which the national average wage is less than half that in Britain according to Wikipedia, but relatively little damage is done to the fabric of our nation by Polish immigration because despite the language difference, Poles are very similar to us in terms of racial composition and ethnicity.

Clearly, Polish immigration into Boston and other places has been mismanaged and a serious problem does exist as a result of a large number of mostly single men arriving in a small community without the facilities to cope. However, despite the disruption this has caused, Polish immigrants have the potential to assimilate into British society without there being a lasting transformation of the character of our society. This cannot be said of immigration from the Third World which has wrought far greater disruption of Britain’s larger towns and cities, which has resulted in the large scale displacement of British communities and the creation of permanent ethnic minority enclaves, inhabited by peoples who are racially and culturally unassimilable.

The debate on immigration has I believe been deliberately skewed by the mass media and the authorities, in order to distract the British public from the most threatening and iniquitous aspects of this issue and thereby contain debate at the most trivial level.

The results of the 2011 Census showed that Polish is spoken by 542,000 people in England and Wales, however debate on this issue of language has ignored the fact that more than 1,638,000 immigrants to Britain speak languages from Asia and North Africa. Which then represents the biggest threat to our native culture?

Due to the large Roma and other gypsy populations of the southern states of Eastern Europe, immigration from those countries is more problematical, but the assimilation of Polish immigrants will not as already stated, significantly change the genetic composition of our nation.

We British have an unsustainably low birth rate at present and despite short-term disruption in terms of the logistics of assimilation, immigration from countries like Poland of even substantial numbers of White people of child bearing age does not present a long-term threat to the existence of our nation. Indeed, in certain respects and if we continue to produce too few children of our own, it could be argued that we should welcome such immigration as a way of bolstering our numbers.

Therefore we should resist attempts to deflect us from this most pressing danger and ensure that our concerns and the concerns of those around us remain firmly focused on stopping and reversing Third World immigration, bringing with it as it does, people who are of an entirely different character in terms of race, ethnicity and culture.

# # # #

By Max Musson © 2013