The Clintons deducted from the federal income tax returns the “value” of Bill’s used underwear that the Clintons supposedly donated to charities.

“Several experts were consulted about Clinton's tax-deductible donations, especially of underwear. Paul Offenbacher, a longtime Washington-area tax accountant, said it is highly unusual to take an itemized deduction on donated underwear; indeed, he had never heard of such a thing. Adelphi University psychology professor George D. Goldman, a New York-based psychoanalyst who studies the unconscious symbolic meanings in human behavior, said the donations are, at the very least, fodder for intriguing speculation… "We don't get too much underwear here; I don't think people want that too much," said Joe Cheslow, a senior resident at the Union Rescue Mission, a haven for homeless people in Little Rock, Ark., that has been a frequent beneficiary of the Clintons' tax-deductible largess. The mission thrift shop has been known to sell used underwear, displayed in bins, at 95 cents a pair….

The Clintons, and their cheerleaders in the MSM, are now questioning why Trump took a legal deduction for a business loss of about $900 million twenty years ago. There is no question that one can take a tax deduction for business losses and carry back and forward such a loss to reduce his income.

Trump’s net operating loss was a legitimate loss that is a legitimate deduction a business should deduct. It is not deducting used underwear.

Now we have the Clintons, and their cheerleaders in the MSM, question a deduction for a net operating loss, while giving a Comey a pass on the Clintons.

What does it tell us about the character of the Bubbas that they deducted Bubba’s used underwear?

The Clintons have a Clinton Family Foundation, which is separate from the Clinton Foundation. The Clintons’ charitable contributions that they deduct are made to the Family Foundation that they control: