KYIV (FNI) - A public scandal grows around a recent Joseph Biden accusation, former US Vice President, who was the main Ukraine’s supervisor under Barack Obama. The scandal takes on a new level and has all chances to question the veracity of previous versions and interpretations of the Attorney General Viktor Shokin dismissal. Moreover, the growing scandal may have far-reaching consequences and move from Kyiv to the American courts in Washington with a new public clash between the Democrats and the Republicans. With his speech at the U.S. Council on Foreign Relations, Joseph Biden has wakened another wave of almost forgotten conflict around the unconstitutional dismissal of Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin. He also created a new moral and ethical basis of the situation by using not flattering epithets addressing Shokin and giving his characteristics. Joseph Biden managed to provoke a resonance in the Ukrainian media. He de facto hit the office of President Petro Poroshenko and Attorney General Yuriy Lutsenko while de facto accusing the current leadership of Ukraine in corruption. But first things first.

To start with, Joseph Biden's most recent statement at the U.S. Council on Foreign Relations, in which he accused Ukraine and country's top officials of corruption, caused a public resonance in Ukraine. Alina, a daughter of Viktor Shokin, says that he is going to sue former US Vice President Joe Biden for his statements and insults to her father and grandmother. Mother is the most sacred person for Ukrainians and Joe Biden lost his face in Ukraine using similar language. She believes that Biden lowered his moral level to the vocabulary of the homeless and made a ground for the moral victory of Viktor Shokin.

Secondly, Ruslan Bortnik, a well-known Ukrainian political scientist, during the exclusively published material for Front News International (The Prosecutor's Office has been in a deep crisis over a year, July 13th, 2017) referred to the possible fact of personal business interests of US Vice President Joseph Biden and his family members when he was a de facto America’s supervisor of Ukraine. Front News International also informed the democratic public about the possible cooperation between the son of Joseph Biden and the British company Burisma, Minister of Ecology Nikolai Zlochevsky, against whom the Prosecutor General's Office of Ukraine conducted an investigation into money laundering (Prosecutor General's post at the cost of $ 1 billion: Shokin’s Replacement, June 22nd, 2017).

T hirdly, the study of the available on the Internet information about the link between the possible US $ 1 billion loan from the US Democratic Administration to Ukraine and the former Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin dismissal, on demand of Vice-President Joseph Biden in violation of all constitutional procedures, not only demonstrated the fact of interference into internal affairs of Ukraine, but also lead to a new wave of public interest in either unsuccessful or failed investigation of Viktor Shokin Attorney General unconstitutional dismissal and Joseph Biden's role in relation of Barack Obama Administration's policy towards Ukraine.

Unfortunately, the lack of sufficient and comprehensive objective information regarding both the role and level of Biden’s personal involvement and the use of US loans in Ukraine may cause speculation in the Ukrainian media, and require an additional comprehensive investigation.

Fourthly, the possible involvement of senior officials of the former Barack Obama administration in corruption schemes of Ukraine can be explored and investigated unequivocally only when answers are received, which is, democratically released information that answers the following questions:

1. Could a real fact of cooperation between Vice President Biden, when he was responsible for Ukraine or his family members, with the Ukrainian oligarch-ex-minister Nikolai Zlochevsky (to which the political scientist Ruslan Bortnik refers in his article) take part and what was the business interest in it? The occupation of high government positions and the simultaneous occupation of business is prohibited by Ukrainian law. How much money passed through Biden as Vice-President of the United States ‘responsible for Ukraine’ and partners or members of his family and whether there is a possibility that a senior official of the Obama administration influenced the allocation of billions of state loans to the accountable ‘American colony’, creating his own corruption system by influencing the law enforcement system in Ukraine (Prosecutor General's Office), which provided the personal business interests of the top functionaries of the Obama Administration? Did President Barack Obama know about the business interests of Joseph Biden in Ukraine? Did the CIA director and the US Attorney General know about these facts? What did the US Treasury and the FBI know about these facts regarding Biden and his relatives, especially regarding taxes and annual financial declarations for the American Tax Services?

2. How many loans have the US given to Ukraine from 2014 until the new Republican Administration of Donald Trump came to power and what exactly were these loans spent for? It is important to get and verify the data from both the official Ukrainian and American side in order to establish the truth and reduce the debt with the loan while understanding the amount of financial obligations-the debt burden that falls on the Ukrainian budget and Ukrainian taxpayers. Without an official joint investigation-independent audit (the creation of an inter-parliamentary investigation group of the US Congress and Parliament of Ukraine) - this is impossible to implement.

3. May the fact of Viktor Shokin's dismissal from the post of Prosecutor General, be the fact of eliminating a dangerous obstacle-risk in the way of realizing the personal business interests of Vice President Joe Biden and its Ukrainian business partners? Whether a shift from the post of Prosecutor General Shokin without evidence and the investigation conducted under Ukrainian law a reprisal against high-ranking officials disliked by the law enforcement system of Ukraine, putting Biden's and his family's business at risk? It should be noted that a so-called process of ‘lustration’ took place during the same period, which more resembled violence and cleared from law enforcement and government bodies professionals not involved in corruption.

4. Whether the fact of having business interests and the involvement of Vice President Joseph Biden is proved ("During EuroMeidan, Nikolai Zlochevsky created the Board of Directors in Burisma, where he introduced Hunter Biden, the son of the US vice-president." After the appointment of the Prosecutor General, Shokin continued the investigation. until, under pressure, including Joseph Biden, was not retired (The Prosecutor General's post at the cost of $ 1 billion: replacement of Shokin"), then logically civil society in Ukraine can raise the issue - and is not appointed New Prosecutor General of Ukraine Yuriy Lutsenko as a guarantor of security of personal business interests and projects of the family of Joseph Biden and his partners in Ukraine? (After the replacement of Shokin by Yuri Lutsenko, accusations against Zlochevsky were reduced to tax evasion, and in 2016 cases against him and the company were closed.)

5. If this is confirmed, then the fact of Lutsenko's appointment to the post of a new prosecutor general, could be a part of the controlled corruption scheme in the democratically controlled Barack Obama-Joe Biden Administration for Ukraine. It makes Ukraine a "corrupt offshore zone" of the US Democratic Party for money laundering, loans to Ukraine and "rendering" military assistance to Ukraine in the war with Russia? It means that US Democrats will de facto act as global distributors of "controlled corruption" in US-controlled countries . But then the legitimate interests of American taxpayers are under real threat and require an investigation - a new response for the Republicans of the alternative "Watergate!" - Another source in the GPU reported that the vice-president of the United States personally requested to close the "case of Zlochevsky" and offered Yuriy Lutsenko as the head of the Prosecutor General's Office "

6. Are not the ongoing recurring scandals between the Republican Trump Administration and the previous Obama administration trying to hide and veil not only the violations of the Republican attack on the presidential company of the candidate Hillary Clinton and her political corruption relationship with the current political forces in Ukraine, but also the corruption violations of the latter Democratic Barrack Obama Administration with their personal business interests in Ukraine?

7. Is Ukraine, in its current legal-military-political form, a new "offshore zone" for corruption schemes for any American administration and the money laundering of American taxpayers?

The final response to a democratic civil society in Ukraine will only be received after an objective investigation of this tangled corrupt knot of the political and financial relationship of the former Democratic Administration of Barack Obama with the allocation and spending of billions of credits for Ukraine.

Logically, the question arises: Will the Donald Trump Administration create its own corruption scheme - an "offshore zone" in Ukraine, starting with personnel policies controlled by senior executives and ending with financial and credit investments in corruption for "political loyalty" - a silence? Is President Trump capable of an objective, courageous and comprehensive investigation - a correction of US policy towards Ukraine, making the country a non-corrupt democratic state?

For the democratic public of Ukraine, these facts are extremely important and exacerbated due to the question on the agenda: how has it happened that in such a short time - only three years - the Ukrainian economy actually collapsed and depleted. Not only were individual plants deliberately destroyed and plundered, but practically the entire branches of the Ukrainian industry were influenced by the export of financial resources abroad to those who call themselves US allies? At this time, Ukraine was still receiving US billion-dollar loans. Moreover, the state debt of Ukraine has grown to unprecedented proportions. What role did the Barack Obama Administration play in this process of economic collapse? May Biden the tip of the iceberg with the senior officials of the Obama Administration involvement? What were American loans used for and what role did they play in the recent years' history of corruption in Ukraine? Will Ukraine get its sovereignty back in terms of Ukrainian judicial and legal system control and heads of higher judicial and power bodies appointment?

Logically, in this context, the question for the Donald Trump Administration arise- whether the new administration will continue the corruption schemes of the previous Democratic Administration, or will conduct a courageous full-scale investigation-audit - the "Alternative Watergate" - regarding the possible corruption involvement of senior officials of the Democratic Administration of President Barack Obama in personal complex business schemes of cashing of US loans intended for Ukraine?

The answer of the Republican Administration of Donald Trump of a set of practical questions will tell a lot, first of all, about the sincerity of the representatives of the American people to develop a friendship, mutual understanding, and trust with the Ukrainians.