With tensions running high over Trump’s stance on immigration and attempted travel ban, it’s easy to get hysterical over any public statements less than damning of recent events.

Unfortunately, South by Southwest festival, which has actually been vocal in its opposition of the travel ban, has fallen victim of this today, after a clause in its artist contract went viral.

The line in particular, which is not a new addition, states that visiting musicians “acting adversely” to the viability of their set will lead to SXSW “notifying the appropriate U.S. immigration authorities of the above actions.”

This was assumed to refer to non-sanctioned performances, which are widespread and quintessential to the festival, and led to calls for boycotts on social media, but actually only applied to acts doing “something really horrific, like disobeying rules about pyrotechnics, starting a brawl, or killing somebody.”

The festival was also wrongly accused of actively looking to deport people itself, when actually it was merely warning its artists of egregious US laws. It’s a bit like if I warned you not to put your hand in a blender and you turned around and accused me of threatening to mangle your fingers.

SXSW did admit that “given the current political climate surrounding immigration, the language that was published seems strong,” but insisted, “violating U.S. immigration law has always carried potentially severe consequences, and we would be remiss not to warn our participating acts of the likely repercussions.”

Here is SXSW managing director Roland Swenson’s statement in full:

SXSW has been vocal in its opposition to President Trump’s Travel Ban and is working hard to build a coalition of attorneys to assist artists with issues at U.S. ports of entry during the event. We have artists from 62 countries from around the world performing and have always supported our international music community. We have never reported international showcasing artists to immigration authorities.

We were sorry to learn that one of our invited performers chose to cancel his performance at this year’s SXSW Music Festival due to a misunderstanding of our policies regarding international artists.

We understand that given the current political climate surrounding immigration, the language that was published seems strong. Violating U.S. immigration law has always carried potentially severe consequences, and we would be remiss not to warn our participating acts of the likely repercussions.

Language governing SXSW’s ability to protect a showcase has been in the artist Performance Agreement for many years. It is, and always was intended to be, a safeguard to provide SXSW with a means to respond to an act that does something truly egregious, such as disobeying our rules about pyrotechnics on stage, starting a brawl in a club, or causing serious safety issues.

The SXSW Performance Agreement states:

If SXSW determines, in its sole discretion, that Artist or its representatives have acted in ways that adversely affect the viability of Artist’s official SXSW showcase, the following actions are available to SXSW:○ Artist will be removed from their official SXSW showcase and, at SXSW’s sole option, replaced.○ Any hotels booked via SXSW Housing will be canceled.○ Artist’s credentials will be canceled.○ SXSW will notify the appropriate U.S. immigration authorities of the above actions.

We hope never to be put in the position to act on this. Indeed, we spend a great deal of time communicating with international artists concerning numerous issues, including how to avoid issues at U.S. ports of entry.

Moreover, there is language in the Performance Agreement which is included to inform foreign artists that the U.S. immigration authorities have mechanisms to create trouble for artists who ignore U.S. immigration laws. For example, those acts coming to SXSW to perform without a work visa are limited, by U.S. immigration law, to performing their showcase event only. If an artist wishes to perform elsewhere, they will require a work visa.