Somebody’s ass is gonna be in the jackpot.

What, you didn’t see the leaked video — with real-time audio — of Noah Syndergaard getting thrown out of a 2016 Mets-Dodgers game, and Terry Collins aggressively defending his pitcher? In that case, you’d better hurry, because Major League Baseball is working to scrub the video from existence.

“If there’s one thing I believe in more strongly than anything else about the way you should conduct yourself in business, it’s that you should live up to your commitments,” baseball commissioner Rob Manfred said Thursday, upon the conclusion of Major League Baseball’s owners meetings in Manhattan. “We made a commitment to the umpires that if they would wear microphones, certain types of interactions that we all know go on on the field would not be aired publicly. We promised them that. It’s in the collective-bargaining agreement.

“We have no choice in a situation like that than to do everything possible to live up to that agreement. It’s kind of Labor Relations 101. To not do that is the kind of breach of trust that puts you in a bad spot in the long run.”

The video, which has provided comic relief to a Mets fan base sorely in need of such, shows Collins dropping countless profanities to the umpires as Syndergaard got thrown out for hurling a fastball well behind the Dodgers’ Chase Utley, in what appeared to be clear retaliation for Utley breaking the leg of Mets shortstop Ruben Tejada in the previous fall’s National League Division Series. Crew chief Tom Hallion continuously utilized the now-legendary phrase, “Our ass is in the jackpot,” apparently reflecting his concerns about scrutiny by his MLB bosses.

Asked whether he was angry that the video, from a Saturday night FOX telecast, leaked, Manfred said: “I’m disappointed. I think we need to figure out how it got out. … Getting angry about that, there’s not really much of a point in that. I think it’s more important that we make clear to our employees that we’re doing everything possible to live up to our agreement and that we figure out how it happened so it doesn’t happen again.”

Manfred, in a de facto state-of-the-game news conference, touched on several issues, including:

— The competition committee met as it does during every owners meetings. Asked in particular about regulating defensive shifts, Manfred said: “We’re happy about where we have gone on pace of game this year. I think we’d like to continue the momentum on pace of game. But I also think that the committee is talking about how the game is being played on the field. Certain trends that there’s been a lot of commentary about. And whether it’s time to manage those trends a little more aggressively.”

The commissioner observed that many baseball folks anticipated that hitters would counter shifts by hitting the ball the other way more often. Instead, an emphasis on launch angles has pushed teams to simply try to hit more home runs, which has led to fewer balls in play.

“I think we want to proceed judiciously” on shifts, Manfred said. “But I also think we want to proceed.” He added: “We’re in the discussion/analysis phase, not the decision phase.”

— Regarding pace of play, MLB said that the average time for a nine-inning game has dropped to 2:59:49 (through Wednesday’s games) from last year’s 3:05:11. An absolutely relevant piece of data in that equation? Non-pitching-change mound visits, limited to six per team per nine-inning game, have dropped from an average of 7.41 per contest last year to 3.92 entering Thursday’s action.

— What if a high-profile series like Yankees-Nationals, which just took place Tuesday and Wednesday in The Bronx, occurred on a Saturday and Sunday instead? Such a notion is being discussed, Manfred said.

“We obviously have been reluctant, because of scheduling traditions, to do a two-game series on a weekend, even if it’s one of our prime rivalries,” Manfred said. “That’s something I think you will see in the future.”

— Even with the Yankees’ Masahiro Tanaka going on the disabled list due to a baserunning injury, Manfred said he doesn’t see the designated hitter going universal any time soon…although it could later.

“I think we have a core of National League owners that prefer the National League game,” Manfred said. “… I think the DH is one of those topics that you never quite put to bed. I think it is a continuing source of conversation among the ownership group. And I think the dialogue actually has moved a little bit.”

— With reigning Home Run Derby champion Aaron Judge very likely opting against defending his crown after suffering a significant left shoulder injury game during last year’s competition — and with that injury displaying the risks of the event — there is some internal concern about the quality of competition for this year’s event at Nationals Park. Manfred voiced confidence there would be representative attendance.

“I think that we have never expected, nor have we experienced, situations where the same guys come back year after year after year after year,” Manfred said. “We have a lot of great players out there, a lot of players who can put on a display in terms of Home Run Derby. And I’m sure that it may not be Aaron Judge, but we will have a complement of players that’ll put on a great Derby.”

He added: “Causality on a particularly injury, who knows? … The Home Run Derby in the context of a team game is a unique opportunity to market your individual brand.”

— With MLB hoping to eventually expand to 32 teams, Manfred noticed the success of the NHL’s pioneering foray into Las Vegas with the Vegas Golden Knights.

“When a franchise goes in and does really well, it has to catch your attention,” he said.

— The owners discussed the ramifications of the nationwide legalization of sports betting.

“I think from our perspective, we see revenue opportunities, but most importantly we see it as an opportunity for fan engagement,” Manfred said. “I think we have two branches of activity going on. One that first and foremost protects the integrity of the game. Equally important, it protects our intellectual property.

“We spend billions of dollars to put games on the field every year, and obviously gaming can be a threat if it doesn’t take place in the appropriate environment. It’s disappointing, I think, that some states — New Jersey in particular — went down a very short-sighted path with respect to gaming, and I think that short-sighted path will make New Jersey not as competitive as some other states who adopt a better, more integrity-focused approach to the betting landscape.”

New Jersey’s bill does not feature an “integrity fee” payable to sports leagues.