■ Stricter consumer protections on prepaid debit cards;

■ Federal loan forgiveness for students at schools that shut down;

■ A rule that bars nursing homes that receive federal funding from requiring residents to resolve all disputes through arbitration, rather than in court.

Under Speaker Paul D. Ryan’s leadership, the House has used the law several times to try to reject a number of the Obama administration’s policies. Those challenges were symbolic — President Obama vetoed every one that reached his desk — but President-elect Trump can approve any sent to him after he takes office. Mr. Ryan’s office did not respond to requests for comment.

“I don’t think they’ll go after every single rule, but I think you’ll get eight to 10 that may be targeted,” said Sam Batkins, the director of regulatory policy at the American Action Forum, a right-leaning group that has been tracking which regulations are subject to congressional review.

The threat posed by the law may slow the usual rush of “midnight regulations” that administrations typically race to finish in their final days. This year, it will be a high-stakes game of chicken — put out a rule and hope it survives, or hold off, to preserve the chance to revisit it in the future?

“I would imagine there will be a serious discussion about regulations that they were planning to finalize,” said Susan E. Dudley, the director of the George Washington University Regulatory Studies Center. “The bluntness of the C.R.A. may be exactly what makes it appealing to the next Congress and president.”

The Labor Department has never tried to revive the rule that President Bush struck down.

“Because this has only been done once before, there’s no litigation history,” said Stuart Shapiro, a Rutgers professor of public policy who previously worked at the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, the unit that coordinates reviews of executive branch regulations.