Download raw source

Delivered-To: john.podesta@gmail.com Received: by 10.25.24.101 with SMTP id o98csp344636lfi; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 05:46:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.202.51.66 with SMTP id z63mr22334233oiz.49.1434372401024; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 05:46:41 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <brentbbi@webtv.net> Received: from SNT004-OMC2S27.hotmail.com (snt004-omc2s27.hotmail.com. [65.55.90.102]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t10si5016329oek.97.2015.06.15.05.46.40 for <john.podesta@gmail.com> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Jun 2015 05:46:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of brentbbi@webtv.net designates 65.55.90.102 as permitted sender) client-ip=65.55.90.102; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of brentbbi@webtv.net designates 65.55.90.102 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=brentbbi@webtv.net Received: from SNT404-EAS69 ([65.55.90.73]) by SNT004-OMC2S27.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22751); Mon, 15 Jun 2015 05:46:40 -0700 X-TMN: [mRvSXh2I9lDGxw3sOl5h8alghlEQCC1r] X-Originating-Email: [brentbbi@webtv.net] Message-ID: <SNT404-EAS69C91C546E204852C1A63FDFB80@phx.gbl> Return-Path: brentbbi@webtv.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Brent Budowsky <brentbbi@webtv.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Robby Mook Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 08:46:39 -0400 To: John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Jun 2015 12:46:40.0190 (UTC) FILETIME=[532235E0:01D0A769] Some advice: Robby Mook should not be on television denying HRC has a trust problem in polls. She does. Everyone knows it. He (and others) can simply= not directly answer that question and say that as her campaign evolves, as her s= pecific positions are announced, she will become the most trusted candidate in the r= ace. Begala does the same thing and it does not help her, it hurts her. To deny t= here is a trust issue when everyone knows there is a trust issue only increases t= he trust problem! And to those who sincerely want to support her, and those who are persuadable to support her, but who do have trust reservations it is insulti= ng to their sincere views to deny those sincerely held views exist. Obviously, when a candidate gives speeches to banks for pay and then denounc= es those banks only weeks after those speeches finally stopped....it raises an i= ssue. She can address the issue in various ways, which involve policies such as Gl= ass Steagall....but to deny the issue exists only makes it worse, not better....= FYI I am soon going to write that Bernie has a chance to win the Iowa caucus= , better it be framed by a friend like me, I think it is true, and its always better to t= ell the truth....denying the trust issue is a losing proposition if our goal is to e= liminate the trust issue....I would either admit it, or transcend it by saying her tr= ust numbers will be sky high as the campaign unfolds....but to deny it is a losing propo= sition that makes it worse.... Sent from my iPad=