We mistakenly thought that a mere 27 precautions checklist would suffice before engaging in sex. We stand corrected.

Get a lawyer before courting

Men need legal counsel to to take precautions not just before sex, but even before courting, kissing and even before conversing with a woman. We missed some essential precautions. 27 precautions are not enough, rather we arrive at a total of 34 precautions before talking, kissing, and sex.

Our original 27 precautions list has items such as

proof of consent,

proof that consent was never withdrawn for even 5 seconds,

proof that the woman was not in any way mentally incapacitated in ways that would invalidate consent,

proof of age for all women that appear to be under 35 years of age. Precautions against fake ID

A lawyer must be consulted before kissing, fondling, courting or even talking

“Excuse me. Miss. I would like to talk to you.

But before any conversation, may I please have your original ID for age and background checks?

Before getting any closer I will need a blood sample for sobriety and drug tests!”

Merely talking to a (potential) minor is dangerous. Touching and kissing is a minefield

If she looks under 35, check ID to avoid minors

Complex laws “protect” adolescents below the “age of consent”. So the mandatory ID checks should be done not just for sex, but before touching and kissing. Thus you avoid “indecent acts with a minor” charges. ID checks are needed even before talking, because mere talking it could be considered “grooming” of a minor. If a 17-year-old looks 30 years old, and if you met her with a fake ID in a over-21-years-bar you still get 15 years in jail. So for any girl looking under 35 years of age, ID needs to be checked for veracity before any further grooming and courting.

Most underage “rape” laws apply to indecent behavior with a minor. Explicit sex is not needed. Derek Logue was arrested in Alabama for making sexual contact (kissing) with an 11-year-old girl I had known while I was in college (around my 23rd birthday). I plead guilty to one count of 1st degree sexual abuse and received a six year sentence.



This could happen to you in less extreme cases, if you engage in necking with a 17 year old you mistook for a 22 year old. Kissing can transmit diseases (see 30b). People (ahem, men) have been sued and ordered to pay US$ 1.5 Million for unproven potential transmission of sexually transmittable diseases through, well, sex. As these can also be transmitted by kissing, genital rubbing, oral genital contact etc. it is only obvious, that legal waivers should be signed before kissing. Of course, dangerous diseases like swine flu, tuberculosis, conjunctivitis can be transmitted by talking, sneezing, handshakes. So maybe, soon a lawyer is needed before handshakes, talking or sneezing or sharing the same room in a movie theater. Grooming If you are just friendly with a minor, we already have grooming laws on file. No attempt at any sexuality is needed, just you befriend a girl and you already are a suspect. Chatting with a potential minor on the internet is the way to get arrested.

We already listed 27 essential precautions before sex in this ground-breaking article

28) Stalking and harassment charge avoidance

Stalking and harassment laws may put you in jail for phoning, texting, or sending flowers

In Britain, if a women feels harassed twice, like by one love letter and once you try to pick her up after work, she can sue you for harassment.

We mistakenly thought that a mere 27 precautions checklist would suffice before engaging in sex. We stand corrected.

Get a lawyer before courting

Men need legal counsel to to take precautions not just before sex, but even before courting, kissing and even before conversing with a woman. We missed some essential precautions. 27 precautions are not enough, rather we arrive at a total of 34 precautions before talking, kissing, and sex.

Our original 27 precautions list has items such as

proof of consent,

proof that consent was never withdrawn for even 5 seconds,

proof that the woman was not in any way mentally incapacitated in ways that would invalidate consent,

proof of age for all women that appear to be under 35 years of age. Precautions against fake ID

A lawyer must be consulted before kissing, fondling, courting or even talking

"Excuse me. Miss. I would like to talk to you.

But before any conversation, may I please have your original ID for age and background checks?

Before getting any closer I will need a blood sample for sobriety and drug tests!"

Merely talking to a (potential) minor is dangerous. Touching and kissing is a minefield

If she looks under 35, check ID to avoid minors

Complex laws "protect" adolescents below the "age of consent". So the mandatory ID checks should be done not just for sex, but before touching and kissing. Thus you avoid "indecent acts with a minor" charges. ID checks are needed even before talking, because mere talking it could be considered "grooming" of a minor. If a 17-year-old looks 30 years old, and if you met her with a fake ID in a over-21-years-bar you still get 15 years in jail. So for any girl looking under 35 years of age, ID needs to be checked for veracity before any further grooming and courting.

Most underage "rape" laws apply to indecent behavior with a minor. Explicit sex is not needed. Derek Logue was arrested in Alabama for making sexual contact (kissing) with an 11-year-old girl I had known while I was in college (around my 23rd birthday). I plead guilty to one count of 1st degree sexual abuse and received a six year sentence.



This could happen to you in less extreme cases, if you engage in necking with a 17 year old you mistook for a 22 year old. Kissing can transmit diseases (see 30b). People (ahem, men) have been sued and ordered to pay US$ 1.5 Million for unproven potential transmission of sexually transmittable diseases through, well, sex. As these can also be transmitted by kissing, genital rubbing, oral genital contact etc. it is only obvious, that legal waivers should be signed before kissing. Of course, dangerous diseases like swine flu, tuberculosis, conjunctivitis can be transmitted by talking, sneezing, handshakes. So maybe, soon a lawyer is needed before handshakes, talking or sneezing or sharing the same room in a movie theater. Grooming If you are just friendly with a minor, we already have grooming laws on file. No attempt at any sexuality is needed, just you befriend a girl and you already are a suspect. Chatting with a potential minor on the internet is the way to get arrested.

We already listed 27 essential precautions before sex in this ground-breaking article

28) Stalking and harassment charge avoidance

Stalking and harassment laws may put you in jail for phoning, texting, or sending flowers

In Britain, if a women feels harassed twice, like by one love letter and once you try to pick her up after work, she can sue you for harassment.

We mistakenly thought that a mere 27 precautions checklist would suffice before engaging in sex. We stand corrected.

Get a lawyer before courting

Men need legal counsel to to take precautions not just before sex, but even before courting, kissing and even before conversing with a woman. We missed some essential precautions. 27 precautions are not enough, rather we arrive at a total of 34 precautions before talking, kissing, and sex.

Our original 27 precautions list has items such as

proof of consent,

proof that consent was never withdrawn for even 5 seconds,

proof that the woman was not in any way mentally incapacitated in ways that would invalidate consent,

proof of age for all women that appear to be under 35 years of age. Precautions against fake ID

A lawyer must be consulted before kissing, fondling, courting or even talking

"Excuse me. Miss. I would like to talk to you.

But before any conversation, may I please have your original ID for age and background checks?

Before getting any closer I will need a blood sample for sobriety and drug tests!"

Merely talking to a (potential) minor is dangerous. Touching and kissing is a minefield

If she looks under 35, check ID to avoid minors

Complex laws "protect" adolescents below the "age of consent". So the mandatory ID checks should be done not just for sex, but before touching and kissing. Thus you avoid "indecent acts with a minor" charges. ID checks are needed even before talking, because mere talking it could be considered "grooming" of a minor. If a 17-year-old looks 30 years old, and if you met her with a fake ID in a over-21-years-bar you still get 15 years in jail. So for any girl looking under 35 years of age, ID needs to be checked for veracity before any further grooming and courting.

Most underage "rape" laws apply to indecent behavior with a minor. Explicit sex is not needed. Derek Logue was arrested in Alabama for making sexual contact (kissing) with an 11-year-old girl I had known while I was in college (around my 23rd birthday). I plead guilty to one count of 1st degree sexual abuse and received a six year sentence.



This could happen to you in less extreme cases, if you engage in necking with a 17 year old you mistook for a 22 year old. Kissing can transmit diseases (see 30b). People (ahem, men) have been sued and ordered to pay US$ 1.5 Million for unproven potential transmission of sexually transmittable diseases through, well, sex. As these can also be transmitted by kissing, genital rubbing, oral genital contact etc. it is only obvious, that legal waivers should be signed before kissing. Of course, dangerous diseases like swine flu, tuberculosis, conjunctivitis can be transmitted by talking, sneezing, handshakes. So maybe, soon a lawyer is needed before handshakes, talking or sneezing or sharing the same room in a movie theater. Grooming If you are just friendly with a minor, we already have grooming laws on file. No attempt at any sexuality is needed, just you befriend a girl and you already are a suspect. Chatting with a potential minor on the internet is the way to get arrested.

We already listed 27 essential precautions before sex in this ground-breaking article

28) Stalking and harassment charge avoidance

Stalking and harassment laws may put you in jail for phoning, texting, or sending flowers

In Britain, if a women feels harassed twice, like by one love letter and once you try to pick her up after work, she can sue you for harassment.

‘stalking’ was the most common form of intimate violence experienced in the past year (3). This may seem like a cause for alarm. Yet dig deeper into the report and it confirms that most stalking convictions were for letter-writing or telephone calls (67 per cent) rather than acting out the stereotypical, menacing view of a stalker who repeatedly follows or watches the victim or hangs around their home or workplace (19 per cent) (4). […] there may be legitimate reasons for waiting to see an ex-partner at their workplace.[…] As with offences of intimate violence generally, the definition of stalking partly relies on the victim’s emotions (in this case, ‘distress, fear or alarm’), and sometimes does not even involve physical acts against them.

http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/earticle/4469/ 1. Prohibition of harassment. — (1) A person must not pursue a course of conduct— (a) which amounts to harassment of another, and (b) which he knows or ought to know amounts to harassment of the other. (2) For the purposes of this section, the person whose course of conduct is in question ought to know that it amounts to harassment of another if a reasonable person in possession of the same information would think the course of conduct amounted to harassment of the other.

statutelaw.gov.uk/content.aspx?activeTextDocId=1563887 In England and Wales, “harassment” was criminalised by the enactment of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, which came into force on June 16, 1997. It makes it a criminal offence, punishable by up to six months imprisonment, to pursue a course of conduct which amounts to harassment of another on two or more occasions. The court can also issue a restraining order, which carries a maximum punishment of five years imprisonment if breached. In England and Wales, liability may arise in the event that the victim suffers either mental or physical harm as a result of being stalked (see R. v. Constanza).

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stalking#England_and_Wales the problem with stalking runs much deeper. There is no legal definition. This is understandable – there are as many types of stalking as there are individual stalkers. Leaving flowers can become stalking if it is done persistently enough. Sending dozens of pizzas to a person’s home – as one woman has recently experienced from her stalker – definitely can.[…] The police and prosecutors are right to, belatedly, start taking stalking seriously, not least because it affects such a massive proportion of the population – 9% of men and 19% of women at last count. But one man’s online campaign is another’s online stalking.[…] You can be convicted of stalking regardless of whether you intended to harm the victim. The only test is an objective one, which is essentially that the conduct seems like stalking to the “reasonable person.” guardian.co.uk/law/afua-hirsch-law-blog/ 2010/sep/23/stalking-social-networking-prosecuting-guidelines we do see an increasing number of stalking victims coming to us for practical help, often with little recourse to law. While Section 4 of the Act (“fear of violence”) does not seem able to be easily applied, it appears all too easy to obtain a conviction under Section 2, however the criteria in Section 2 is vague, with no necessity for the accused to be warned that their behaviour may lead to a conviction. This has led to the Act being drawn into marital disputes – as a weapon – and even into disputes between next-door businesses. One example of apparent misuse is a father’s conviction after he attempted to see his daughter when his wife refused access. answers.uk.com/services/stalk.htm

29) Sexual harassment avoidance

29) Don’t even think of flirting at work. Or at college. Sexual harassment laws abolished free speech at the work place or at US Universities. The Sexual Harassment Industry (SHI) forbids anything, from compliments, to elevator eyes to objectifying gaze. Any “power differential” makes you a potential rapist of your secretary. If there is no power differential, then you may be guilty of “peer harassment”. Courts apply the “reasonable woman standard”, which says that any slightest discomfort to an (un)reasonable woman is sexual harassment. Men get convicted by the preponderance of evidence standard, not by the “beyond reasonable doubt” standard.

It is advisable to not cause any discomfort and displeasure in any woman, because she can always allege sexual harassment or rape. In these accusations, men are guilty until proven innocent. Proving innocence is especially difficult if she presses charges only after 36 years. False rape accusations are a powerful weapon of angry women.

STD lawsuit avoidance

30a) Have her sign a waiver regarding STD (sexually transmitted diseases) and an informed consent that she is fully aware that there always is a possibility to catch diseases through sex. Waiver of right to sue and informed consent form to sexual activity:

I have been advised that having sex can give cause to sexually transmitted diseases. Some of them, such as Herpes and HPV are carried by as many as 20%, 30% or more of the population. These can lie dormant, can be transmitted even when inactive and asymptomatic. They even can be transmitted by kissing, by oral sex, or by warts on any part of the body. HPV can be contracted at birth, so even virgin men can be carriers. HPV warts can develop on any part of the body, so rubbing genitals anywhere can transmit HPV. Reason : A dentist in Iowa was ordered to pay US$ 1.5 million to a women he allegedly transmitted HPV (not HIV-AIDS) to. The woman provided no proof that she was HPV-free before her relationship, nor that he had HPV, nor that it was transmitted through their sexual relation. Nevertheless, in civil suits, if a jury or judge think it is 55% likely that one party is wrong, that party gets convicted. Muscatine woman wins $1.5 million in HPV lawsuit HPV lawsuit HPV Litigation Cases and Why Men Are at Risk Woman Sues Husband; Claims He Gave Her Herpes. Suing for $50K 30b) It is imperative to consult a lawyer before kissing and get a waiver and informed consent regarding disease transmission through kissing. Many diseases can be transmitted by kissing, Herpes, Gonorrhea, common flu, Cytomegalovirus etc. can be transmitted by kissing. Kissing is probably more dangerous then oral sex. 31) Have a complete STD checkup on her and on yourself. This way she cannot sue you for her pre-existing disease (in case the disease can be tested for or will show up) This is just an attempt to remedy the situation. There are no tests for asymptomatic carriers of HPV, and other diseases Human-Stupidity comment : a complete disclosure of medical records regarding transmittable diseases would be advisable from an epidemiological point of view. But on the contrary, public health policy keeps HIV (AIDS) records confidential and considers it sufficient for infected people to use condoms. Further discussion about full disclosure, quarantine etc. is very interesting as it could prevent the spread of many diseases, but is beyond the scope of this article.

Be aware of future consequences of a sex act, cohabitation or marriage

To recapitulate the other precautions:

Summary of the other 27 precautions for a man before having sex

study of the law in your country and state of residence and at the actual location where the sexual activity takes place If anyone appears under 40 years of age, check ID for age and authenticity with help of a detective or police Incest avoidance through genealogy and genetic analysis Test for alcohol, drugs, that nobody is legally incompetent or has mental impairment Assure and document consent in writing and prove it never has been withdrawn, requiring seamless recordings or constant presence of several witnesses safekeeping and organizing this documentation and recordings Prevent child support, pregnancy support, spousal support, common law marriage claims Prevent accusations of domestic violence, spousal abuse Avoid prostitution charges is married sex a safer alternative?

Read all in 27 precautions for a man before having sex.

Never have sex before you are 18: Underage avoidance.

Underage avoidance is very complex. Adolescents are in real trouble. If you are under 20, you should also study

Consult a lawyer before playing doctor. Perverse sex laws traumatize children

This should convince you to never have sex until you are at least 18 years of age. If you don’t get punished, then your partner might get punished. In California, if two 17 year olds have a sexual relationship, both are criminal rapists.

Teenage sexuality: The immense complexity of local laws, state lines and international travel

Why all these laws? Has the world gone crazy?

Yes. Feminism, together with religious fanatics, have conspired to make laws to criminalize male behavior and sexuality. The AntiFeminist has his theory of the Sexual Trade Union. Robert Kurzban has some explanations why almost everyone gains from interfering in other people’s sexuality.

‘stalking’ was the most common form of intimate violence experienced in the past year (3). This may seem like a cause for alarm. Yet dig deeper into the report and it confirms that most stalking convictions were for letter-writing or telephone calls (67 per cent) rather than acting out the stereotypical, menacing view of a stalker who repeatedly follows or watches the victim or hangs around their home or workplace (19 per cent) (4). […] there may be legitimate reasons for waiting to see an ex-partner at their workplace.[…] As with offences of intimate violence generally, the definition of stalking partly relies on the victim’s emotions (in this case, ‘distress, fear or alarm’), and sometimes does not even involve physical acts against them.

http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/earticle/4469/ 1. Prohibition of harassment. — (1) A person must not pursue a course of conduct— (a) which amounts to harassment of another, and (b) which he knows or ought to know amounts to harassment of the other. (2) For the purposes of this section, the person whose course of conduct is in question ought to know that it amounts to harassment of another if a reasonable person in possession of the same information would think the course of conduct amounted to harassment of the other.

statutelaw.gov.uk/content.aspx?activeTextDocId=1563887 In England and Wales, "harassment" was criminalised by the enactment of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, which came into force on June 16, 1997. It makes it a criminal offence, punishable by up to six months imprisonment, to pursue a course of conduct which amounts to harassment of another on two or more occasions. The court can also issue a restraining order, which carries a maximum punishment of five years imprisonment if breached. In England and Wales, liability may arise in the event that the victim suffers either mental or physical harm as a result of being stalked (see R. v. Constanza).

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stalking#England_and_Wales the problem with stalking runs much deeper. There is no legal definition. This is understandable – there are as many types of stalking as there are individual stalkers. Leaving flowers can become stalking if it is done persistently enough. Sending dozens of pizzas to a person’s home – as one woman has recently experienced from her stalker – definitely can.[…] The police and prosecutors are right to, belatedly, start taking stalking seriously, not least because it affects such a massive proportion of the population – 9% of men and 19% of women at last count. But one man’s online campaign is another’s online stalking.[…] You can be convicted of stalking regardless of whether you intended to harm the victim. The only test is an objective one, which is essentially that the conduct seems like stalking to the "reasonable person." guardian.co.uk/law/afua-hirsch-law-blog/ 2010/sep/23/stalking-social-networking-prosecuting-guidelines we do see an increasing number of stalking victims coming to us for practical help, often with little recourse to law. While Section 4 of the Act ("fear of violence") does not seem able to be easily applied, it appears all too easy to obtain a conviction under Section 2, however the criteria in Section 2 is vague, with no necessity for the accused to be warned that their behaviour may lead to a conviction. This has led to the Act being drawn into marital disputes – as a weapon – and even into disputes between next-door businesses. One example of apparent misuse is a father’s conviction after he attempted to see his daughter when his wife refused access. answers.uk.com/services/stalk.htm

29) Sexual harassment avoidance

29) Don’t even think of flirting at work. Or at college. Sexual harassment laws abolished free speech at the work place or at US Universities. The Sexual Harassment Industry (SHI) forbids anything, from compliments, to elevator eyes to objectifying gaze. Any "power differential" makes you a potential rapist of your secretary. If there is no power differential, then you may be guilty of "peer harassment". Courts apply the "reasonable woman standard", which says that any slightest discomfort to an (un)reasonable woman is sexual harassment. Men get convicted by the preponderance of evidence standard, not by the "beyond reasonable doubt" standard.

It is advisable to not cause any discomfort and displeasure in any woman, because she can always allege sexual harassment or rape. In these accusations, men are guilty until proven innocent. Proving innocence is especially difficult if she presses charges only after 36 years. False rape accusations are a powerful weapon of angry women.

STD lawsuit avoidance

30a) Have her sign a waiver regarding STD (sexually transmitted diseases) and an informed consent that she is fully aware that there always is a possibility to catch diseases through sex. Waiver of right to sue and informed consent form to sexual activity:

I have been advised that having sex can give cause to sexually transmitted diseases. Some of them, such as Herpes and HPV are carried by as many as 20%, 30% or more of the population. These can lie dormant, can be transmitted even when inactive and asymptomatic. They even can be transmitted by kissing, by oral sex, or by warts on any part of the body. HPV can be contracted at birth, so even virgin men can be carriers. HPV warts can develop on any part of the body, so rubbing genitals anywhere can transmit HPV. Reason : A dentist in Iowa was ordered to pay US$ 1.5 million to a women he allegedly transmitted HPV (not HIV-AIDS) to. The woman provided no proof that she was HPV-free before her relationship, nor that he had HPV, nor that it was transmitted through their sexual relation. Nevertheless, in civil suits, if a jury or judge think it is 55% likely that one party is wrong, that party gets convicted. Muscatine woman wins $1.5 million in HPV lawsuit HPV lawsuit HPV Litigation Cases and Why Men Are at Risk Woman Sues Husband; Claims He Gave Her Herpes. Suing for $50K 30b) It is imperative to consult a lawyer before kissing and get a waiver and informed consent regarding disease transmission through kissing. Many diseases can be transmitted by kissing, Herpes, Gonorrhea, common flu, Cytomegalovirus etc. can be transmitted by kissing. Kissing is probably more dangerous then oral sex. 31) Have a complete STD checkup on her and on yourself. This way she cannot sue you for her pre-existing disease (in case the disease can be tested for or will show up) This is just an attempt to remedy the situation. There are no tests for asymptomatic carriers of HPV, and other diseases Human-Stupidity comment : a complete disclosure of medical records regarding transmittable diseases would be advisable from an epidemiological point of view. But on the contrary, public health policy keeps HIV (AIDS) records confidential and considers it sufficient for infected people to use condoms. Further discussion about full disclosure, quarantine etc. is very interesting as it could prevent the spread of many diseases, but is beyond the scope of this article.

Be aware of future consequences of a sex act, cohabitation or marriage

To recapitulate the other precautions:

Summary of the other 27 precautions for a man before having sex

study of the law in your country and state of residence and at the actual location where the sexual activity takes place If anyone appears under 40 years of age, check ID for age and authenticity with help of a detective or police Incest avoidance through genealogy and genetic analysis Test for alcohol, drugs, that nobody is legally incompetent or has mental impairment Assure and document consent in writing and prove it never has been withdrawn, requiring seamless recordings or constant presence of several witnesses safekeeping and organizing this documentation and recordings Prevent child support, pregnancy support, spousal support, common law marriage claims Prevent accusations of domestic violence, spousal abuse Avoid prostitution charges is married sex a safer alternative?

Read all in 27 precautions for a man before having sex.

Never have sex before you are 18: Underage avoidance.

Underage avoidance is very complex. Adolescents are in real trouble. If you are under 20, you should also study

Consult a lawyer before playing doctor. Perverse sex laws traumatize children

This should convince you to never have sex until you are at least 18 years of age. If you don’t get punished, then your partner might get punished. In California, if two 17 year olds have a sexual relationship, both are criminal rapists.

Teenage sexuality: The immense complexity of local laws, state lines and international travel

Why all these laws? Has the world gone crazy?

Yes. Feminism, together with religious fanatics, have conspired to make laws to criminalize male behavior and sexuality. The AntiFeminist has his theory of the Sexual Trade Union. Robert Kurzban has some explanations why almost everyone gains from interfering in other people’s sexuality.

‘stalking’ was the most common form of intimate violence experienced in the past year (3). This may seem like a cause for alarm. Yet dig deeper into the report and it confirms that most stalking convictions were for letter-writing or telephone calls (67 per cent) rather than acting out the stereotypical, menacing view of a stalker who repeatedly follows or watches the victim or hangs around their home or workplace (19 per cent) (4). […] there may be legitimate reasons for waiting to see an ex-partner at their workplace.[…] As with offences of intimate violence generally, the definition of stalking partly relies on the victim’s emotions (in this case, ‘distress, fear or alarm’), and sometimes does not even involve physical acts against them.

http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/earticle/4469/ 1. Prohibition of harassment. — (1) A person must not pursue a course of conduct— (a) which amounts to harassment of another, and (b) which he knows or ought to know amounts to harassment of the other. (2) For the purposes of this section, the person whose course of conduct is in question ought to know that it amounts to harassment of another if a reasonable person in possession of the same information would think the course of conduct amounted to harassment of the other.

statutelaw.gov.uk/content.aspx?activeTextDocId=1563887 In England and Wales, "harassment" was criminalised by the enactment of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, which came into force on June 16, 1997. It makes it a criminal offence, punishable by up to six months imprisonment, to pursue a course of conduct which amounts to harassment of another on two or more occasions. The court can also issue a restraining order, which carries a maximum punishment of five years imprisonment if breached. In England and Wales, liability may arise in the event that the victim suffers either mental or physical harm as a result of being stalked (see R. v. Constanza).

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stalking#England_and_Wales the problem with stalking runs much deeper. There is no legal definition. This is understandable – there are as many types of stalking as there are individual stalkers. Leaving flowers can become stalking if it is done persistently enough. Sending dozens of pizzas to a person’s home – as one woman has recently experienced from her stalker – definitely can.[…] The police and prosecutors are right to, belatedly, start taking stalking seriously, not least because it affects such a massive proportion of the population – 9% of men and 19% of women at last count. But one man’s online campaign is another’s online stalking.[…] You can be convicted of stalking regardless of whether you intended to harm the victim. The only test is an objective one, which is essentially that the conduct seems like stalking to the "reasonable person." guardian.co.uk/law/afua-hirsch-law-blog/ 2010/sep/23/stalking-social-networking-prosecuting-guidelines we do see an increasing number of stalking victims coming to us for practical help, often with little recourse to law. While Section 4 of the Act ("fear of violence") does not seem able to be easily applied, it appears all too easy to obtain a conviction under Section 2, however the criteria in Section 2 is vague, with no necessity for the accused to be warned that their behaviour may lead to a conviction. This has led to the Act being drawn into marital disputes – as a weapon – and even into disputes between next-door businesses. One example of apparent misuse is a father’s conviction after he attempted to see his daughter when his wife refused access. answers.uk.com/services/stalk.htm

29) Sexual harassment avoidance

29) Don’t even think of flirting at work. Or at college. Sexual harassment laws abolished free speech at the work place or at US Universities. The Sexual Harassment Industry (SHI) forbids anything, from compliments, to elevator eyes to objectifying gaze. Any "power differential" makes you a potential rapist of your secretary. If there is no power differential, then you may be guilty of "peer harassment". Courts apply the "reasonable woman standard", which says that any slightest discomfort to an (un)reasonable woman is sexual harassment. Men get convicted by the preponderance of evidence standard, not by the "beyond reasonable doubt" standard.

It is advisable to not cause any discomfort and displeasure in any woman, because she can always allege sexual harassment or rape. In these accusations, men are guilty until proven innocent. Proving innocence is especially difficult if she presses charges only after 36 years. False rape accusations are a powerful weapon of angry women.

STD lawsuit avoidance

30a) Have her sign a waiver regarding STD (sexually transmitted diseases) and an informed consent that she is fully aware that there always is a possibility to catch diseases through sex. Waiver of right to sue and informed consent form to sexual activity:

I have been advised that having sex can give cause to sexually transmitted diseases. Some of them, such as Herpes and HPV are carried by as many as 20%, 30% or more of the population. These can lie dormant, can be transmitted even when inactive and asymptomatic. They even can be transmitted by kissing, by oral sex, or by warts on any part of the body. HPV can be contracted at birth, so even virgin men can be carriers. HPV warts can develop on any part of the body, so rubbing genitals anywhere can transmit HPV. Reason : A dentist in Iowa was ordered to pay US$ 1.5 million to a women he allegedly transmitted HPV (not HIV-AIDS) to. The woman provided no proof that she was HPV-free before her relationship, nor that he had HPV, nor that it was transmitted through their sexual relation. Nevertheless, in civil suits, if a jury or judge think it is 55% likely that one party is wrong, that party gets convicted. Muscatine woman wins $1.5 million in HPV lawsuit HPV lawsuit HPV Litigation Cases and Why Men Are at Risk Woman Sues Husband; Claims He Gave Her Herpes. Suing for $50K 30b) It is imperative to consult a lawyer before kissing and get a waiver and informed consent regarding disease transmission through kissing. Many diseases can be transmitted by kissing, Herpes, Gonorrhea, common flu, Cytomegalovirus etc. can be transmitted by kissing. Kissing is probably more dangerous then oral sex. 31) Have a complete STD checkup on her and on yourself. This way she cannot sue you for her pre-existing disease (in case the disease can be tested for or will show up) This is just an attempt to remedy the situation. There are no tests for asymptomatic carriers of HPV, and other diseases Human-Stupidity comment : a complete disclosure of medical records regarding transmittable diseases would be advisable from an epidemiological point of view. But on the contrary, public health policy keeps HIV (AIDS) records confidential and considers it sufficient for infected people to use condoms. Further discussion about full disclosure, quarantine etc. is very interesting as it could prevent the spread of many diseases, but is beyond the scope of this article.

Be aware of future consequences of a sex act, cohabitation or marriage

To recapitulate the other precautions:

Summary of the other 27 precautions for a man before having sex

study of the law in your country and state of residence and at the actual location where the sexual activity takes place If anyone appears under 40 years of age, check ID for age and authenticity with help of a detective or police Incest avoidance through genealogy and genetic analysis Test for alcohol, drugs, that nobody is legally incompetent or has mental impairment Assure and document consent in writing and prove it never has been withdrawn, requiring seamless recordings or constant presence of several witnesses safekeeping and organizing this documentation and recordings Prevent child support, pregnancy support, spousal support, common law marriage claims Prevent accusations of domestic violence, spousal abuse Avoid prostitution charges is married sex a safer alternative?

Read all in 27 precautions for a man before having sex.

Never have sex before you are 18: Underage avoidance.

Underage avoidance is very complex. Adolescents are in real trouble. If you are under 20, you should also study

Consult a lawyer before playing doctor. Perverse sex laws traumatize children

This should convince you to never have sex until you are at least 18 years of age. If you don’t get punished, then your partner might get punished. In California, if two 17 year olds have a sexual relationship, both are criminal rapists.

Teenage sexuality: The immense complexity of local laws, state lines and international travel

Why all these laws? Has the world gone crazy?

Yes. Feminism, together with religious fanatics, have conspired to make laws to criminalize male behavior and sexuality. The AntiFeminist has his theory of the Sexual Trade Union. Robert Kurzban has some explanations why almost everyone gains from interfering in other people’s sexuality.

Related