A party with no music

Drake

immediately

Kiki Do You Love Me

Image: Qiang Chen

If the plaintiff's are successfull in proving that the beat was used, the defendants might have thought they were exempt under Fair Use but in this case were probably Doing It Wrong. In 2017 Drake and the same publishers successfully defended a copyright infringement case under Fair Use for a sample of a spoken-word recording, after a New York judge determined that the use was transformative. The case turned on the fact that Drake's song transformed the message of the original work "adding something new, with a further purpose or different character, altering the first with new expression, meaning or message."If the plaintiff's are successfull in proving that the beat was used, the defendants might have thought they were exempt under Fair Use but in this case were probably

The aftermath of Blurred Lines continues, from, toand now Drake is being sued for a beat...however, this case is slightly different in that Drake is accused of sampling without a licence, not copying a substantial part by recreating.with the details and other terrible Drake puns...The action is brought by Samuel Nicholas III (known as Sam Skully), the author and owner of the copyright in a beat titled “Roll Call (Instrumental)”. In 2000, Skully published a CD which included the tracks “Roll Call” and an instrumental-only version for DJs to use to create mixes called “Roll Call (Instrumental)”.There are nine defendants which include Drake, the producers and publishing companies involved in two songs “” and “” from Drake’s 2018 album Scorpion, both Billboard number one singles.A side story that may or may not be of any relevance to the case - at paragraph 15 of the complaint the plaintiff relives a disappointing New-Year’s-Eve-Eve in 2017 when he arrived at Gasa Gasa nightclub in New Orleans for. Defendant number threewas supposed to be DJing. According to the complaint, when Skully arrived Big Freedia “immediately stopped playing and would not resume playing”. This story was quite distracting for this Kat. Naturally she had to launch an investigation into the venue to find out the proximity of the doorway and the DJ booth because, unless the place was empty, it seems hard to believe that the DJ would have known that Skully had stepped into the venue in order tostop playing. I guess Skully had to...On 29th July 2019, Genius News published a YouTube video of an interview with defendant number one, producer Adam Pigott (known as BlaqNmilD). In the video, Pigott is talking about the influence of New Orleans Bounce in the Drake songs “Nice for What” and “In My Feelings”. He explains at 1 minute 50 that he added a bounce beat loop called “That Beat” to the records, which must behad because it is also sampled in several other tracks he produced including with Big Freedia. The video shows an 18 second sound clip of “That Beat” while displaying an audio spectrum labelled "blaq_bouncebeat.wav". Skully claims that “That Beat” is in fact his copyright protected work “Roll Call (Instrumental)”. [FYI if you search Roll Call Instrumental on YouTube, you get Thomas the Tank Engine, but].What the complaint does not specify is how the plaintiff knows that "That Beat" is "Roll Call (Instrumental)" used in both Drake's songs and Big Freedia's, it just says that it is a direct copy. Typically Bounce songs include one of a limited number of beats, of which Roll Call is one. However, a differentsuggests that the song actually samples Drag Rap, another popular beat in Bounce.The complaint seeks a trial by jury and all the usual relief for copyright infringment; damages, treble damages, profits, and. Since the complaint, filed 21st August 2019, a summons was issued giving the defedants 21 days to respond to the claim.