In May of last year doing things with ASP.NET and Docker was in its infancy. But cool stuff was afoot. I wrote a blog post showing how to publish an ASP.NET 5 (5 at the time, now Core 1.0) app to Docker. Later in December of 2015 new tools like Docker Toolbox and Kitematic made things even easier. In May of 2016 Docker for Windows Beta continued to move the ball forward nicely.

I wanted to see how things are looking with ASP.NET Core, Docker, and Windows here in October of 2016.

I installed these things:

Docker for Windows is really nice as it automates setting up Hyper-V for you and creates the Docker host OS and gets it all running. This is a big time saver.

There's my Linux host that I don't really have to think about. I'll do everything from the command line or from Visual Studio.

I'll say File | New Project and make a new ASP.NET Core application running on .NET Core.

Then I right click and Add | Docker Support. This menu comes from the Visual Studio Tools for Docker extension. This adds a basic Dockerfile and some docker-compose files. Out of the box, I'm all setup to deploy my ASP.NET Core app to a Docker Linux container.

ASP.NET Core in a Docker Linux Container

Starting from my ASP.NET Core app, I'll make sure my base image (that's the FROM in the Dockerfile) is the base ASP.NET Core image for Linux.

FROM microsoft/aspnetcore:1.0.1

ENTRYPOINT ["dotnet", "WebApplication4.dll"]

ARG source=.

WORKDIR /app

EXPOSE 80

COPY $source .

Next, since I don't want Docker to do the building of my application yet, I'll publish it locally. Be sure to read Steve Lasker's blog post "Building Optimized Docker Images with ASP.NET Core" to learn how to have one docker container build your app and the other run it it. This optimizes server density and resource.

I'll publish, then build the images, and run it.

>dotnet publish



>docker build bin\Debug

etcoreapp1.0\publish -t aspnetcoreonlinux



>docker images

REPOSITORY TAG IMAGE ID CREATED SIZE

aspnetcoreonlinux latest dab2bff7e4a6 28 seconds ago 276.2 MB

microsoft/aspnetcore 1.0.1 2e781d03cb22 44 hours ago 266.7 MB



>docker run -it -d -p 85:80 aspnetcoreonlinux

1cfcc8e8e7d4e6257995f8b64505ce25ae80e05fe1962d4312b2e2fe33420413



>docker ps

CONTAINER ID IMAGE COMMAND CREATED STATUS PORTS NAMES

1cfcc8e8e7d4 aspnetcoreonlinux "dotnet WebApplicatio" 2 seconds ago Up 1 seconds 0.0.0.0:85->80/tcp clever_archimedes

And there's my ASP.NET Core app running in Docker. So I'm running Windows, running Hyper-V, running a Linux host that is hosting Docker containers.

What else can I do?

ASP.NET Core in a Docker Windows Container running Windows Nano Server

There's Windows Server, there's Windows Server Core that removes the UI among other things and there's Windows Nano Server which gets Windows down to like hundreds of megs instead of many gigs. This means there's a lot of great choices depending on what you need for functionality and server density. Ship as little as possible.

Let me see if I can get ASP.NET Core running on Kestrel under Windows Nano Server. Certainly, since Nano is very capable, I could run IIS within the container and there's docs on that.

Michael Friis from Docker has a great blog post on building and running your first Docker Windows Server Container. With the new Docker for Windows you can just right click on it and switch between Linux and Windows Containers.

So now I'm using Docker with Windows Containers. You may not know that you likely already have Windows Containers! It was shipped inside Windows 10 Anniversary Edition. You can check for Containers in Features:

I'll change my Dockerfile to use the Windows Nano Server image. I can also control the ports that ASP.NET talks on if I like with an Environment Variable and Expose that within Docker.

FROM microsoft/dotnet:nanoserver

ENTRYPOINT ["dotnet", "WebApplication4.dll"]

ARG source=.

WORKDIR /app

ENV ASPNETCORE_URLS http://+:82

EXPOSE 82

COPY $source .

Then I'll publish and build...

>dotnet publish

>docker build bin\Debug

etcoreapp1.0\publish -t aspnetcoreonnano

Then I'll run it, mapping the ports from Windows outside to the Windows container inside!

NOTE: There's a bug as of this writing that affects how Windows 10 talks to Containers via "NAT" (Network Address Translation) such that you can't easily go http://localhost:82 like you (and I) want to. Today you have to hit the IP of the container directly. I'll report back once I hear more about this bug and how it gets fixed. It'll show up in Windows Update one day. The workaround is to get the IP address of the container from docker like this: docker inspect -f "{{ .NetworkSettings.Networks.nat.IPAddress }}" HASH



UPDATE: This bug has been fixed in the Windows 10 April Update. Details here Localhost Access to Windows Container Ports

So I'll run my ASP.NET Core app on Windows Nano Server (again, to be clear, this is running on Windows 10 and Nano Server is inside a Container!)

>docker run -it -d -p 88:82 aspnetcoreonnano

afafdbead8b04205841a81d974545f033dcc9ba7f761ff7e6cc0ec8f3ecce215



>docker inspect -f "{{ .NetworkSettings.Networks.nat.IPAddress }}" afa

172.16.240.197

Now I can hit that site with 172.16.240.197:82. Once that bug above is fixed, it'll get hit and routed like any container.

The best part about Windows Containers is that they are fast and lightweight. Once the image is downloaded and build on your machine, you're starting and stopping them in seconds with Docker.

BUT, you can also isolate Windows Containers using Docker like this:

docker run --isolation=hyperv -it -d -p 86:82 aspnetcoreonnano

So now this instance is running fully isolated within Hyper-V itself. You get the best of all worlds. Speed and convenient deployment plus optional and easy isolation.

ASP.NET Core in a Docker Windows Container running Windows Server Core 2016

I can then change the Dockerfile to use the full Windows Server Core image. This is 8 gigs so be ready as it'll take a bit to download and extract but it is really Windows. You can also choose to run this as a container or as an isolated Hyper-V container.

Here I just change the FROM to get a Windows Sever Core with .NET Core included.

FROM microsoft/dotnet:1.0.0-preview2-windowsservercore-sdk

ENTRYPOINT ["dotnet", "WebApplication4.dll"]

ARG source=.

WORKDIR /app

ENV ASPNETCORE_URLS http://+:82

EXPOSE 82

COPY $source .

NOTE: I hear it's likely that the the .NET Core on Windows Server Core images will likely go away. It makes more sense for .NET Core to run on Windows Nano Server or other lightweight images. You'll use Server Core for heavier stuff, and Server is nice because it means you can run "full" .NET Framework apps in containers! If you REALLY want to have .NET Core on Server Core you can make your own Dockerfile and easily build and image that has the things you want.

Then I'll publish, build, and run again.

>docker images

REPOSITORY TAG IMAGE ID CREATED SIZE

aspnetcoreonnano latest 7e02d6800acf 24 minutes ago 1.113 GB

aspnetcoreonservercore latest a11d9a9ba0c2 28 minutes ago 7.751 GB

Since containers are so fast to start and stop I can have a complete web farm running with Redis in a Container, SQL in another, and my web stack in a third. Or mix and match.

>docker ps

CONTAINER ID IMAGE COMMAND PORTS NAMES

d32a981ceabb aspnetcoreonwindows "dotnet WebApplicatio" 0.0.0.0:87->82/tcp compassionate_blackwell

a179a48ca9f6 aspnetcoreonnano "dotnet WebApplicatio" 0.0.0.0:86->82/tcp determined_stallman

170a8afa1b8b aspnetcoreonnano "dotnet WebApplicatio" 0.0.0.0:89->82/tcp agitated_northcutt

afafdbead8b0 aspnetcoreonnano "dotnet WebApplicatio" 0.0.0.0:88->82/tcp naughty_ramanujan

2cf45ea2f008 a7fa77b6f1d4 "dotnet WebApplicatio" 0.0.0.0:97->82/tcp sleepy_hodgkin

Conclusion

Again, go check out Michael's article where he uses Docker Compose to bring up the ASP.NET Music Store sample with SQL Express in one Windows Container and ASP.NET Core in another as well as Steve Lasker's blog (in fact his whole blog is gold) on making optimized Docker images with ASP.NET Core.

IMAGE ID RESPOSITORY TAG SIZE

0ec4274c5571 web optimized 276.2 MB

f9f196304c95 web single 583.8 MB

f450043e0a44 microsoft/aspnetcore 1.0.1 266.7 MB

706045865622 microsoft/aspnetcore-build 1.0.1 896.6 MB

Steve points out a number of techniques that will allow you to get the most out of Docker and ASP.NET Core.

The result of all this means (IMHO) that you can use ASP.NET Core:

ASP.NET Core on Linux within Docker containers in any Cloud

ASP.NET Core on Windows, Windows Server, Server Core, and Nano Server. within Docker windows containers within Docker isolated Hyper-V containers



This means you can choose the level of feature support and size to optimize for server density and convenience. Once all the tooling (the Docker folks with Docker for Windows and the VS folks with Visual Studio Docker Tools) is baked, we'll have nice debugging and workflows from dev to production.

What have you been doing with Docker, Containers, and ASP.NET Core? Sound off in the comments.

Sponsor: Thanks to Redgate this week! Discover the world’s most trusted SQL Server comparison tool. Enjoy a free trial of SQL Compare, the industry standard for comparing and deploying SQL Server schemas.