Enlarge By Darron Cummings, AP Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin speaks at a rally in Fort Wayne, Ind., on Saturday. 2008 CANDIDATE PROFILES 2008 CANDIDATE PROFILES 2008 Republican nominee: Sen. John McCain of Arizona -- Six things to do before Nov. 4 John McCain on the campaign issues: Taxes | Iraq | Energy | Immigration | Health care | Education | Abortion | Gay civil rights 2008 Democratic nominee: Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois -- Six things to do before Nov. 4 Barack Obama on the campaign issues: Taxes | Iraq | Energy | Immigration | Health care | Education | Abortion | Gay civil rights Match up with a candidate: Our issues game lets you compare your views with those of Obama and McCain. ANCHORAGE  Gov. Sarah Palin's signature accomplishment — a contract to build a 1,715-mile pipeline to bring natural gas from Alaska to the Lower 48 — emerged from a flawed bidding process that narrowed the field to a company with ties to her administration, an Associated Press investigation shows. Beginning at the Republican National Convention in August, the McCain-Palin ticket has touted the pipeline as an example of how it would help America achieve energy independence. Despite Palin's boast of a smart and fair bidding process, the AP found that her team crafted terms that favored only a few independent pipeline companies and ultimately benefited the winner, TransCanada Corp. And contrary to the ballyhoo, there's no guarantee the pipeline will ever be built; at a minimum, any project is years away, as TransCanada must first overcome major financial and regulatory hurdles. In interviews and a review of records, the AP found: _Instead of creating a process that would attract many potential builders, Palin slanted the terms away from an important group — the global energy giants that own the rights to the gas. _Despite promises and legal guidance not to talk directly with potential bidders, Palin had meetings or phone calls with nearly every major candidate, including TransCanada. _The leader of Palin's pipeline team had been a partner at a lobbying firm where she worked on behalf of a TransCanada subsidiary. Also, that woman's former business partner at the lobbying firm was TransCanada's lead private lobbyist on the pipeline deal. Plus, a former TransCanada executive served as an outside consultant to Palin's pipeline team. _Under a different set of rules four years earlier, TransCanada had offered to build the pipeline without a state subsidy; under Palin, the company could receive a maximum $500 million. "Governor Palin held firmly to her fundamental belief that Alaska could best serve Alaskans and the nation's interests by pursuing a competitive approach to building a natural gas pipeline," said McCain-Palin spokesman Taylor Griffin. "There was an open and transparent process that subjected the decision to extensive public scrutiny and due diligence." There were never more than a few players that could execute such a complex undertaking — at least a million tons of steel stretching across some of Earth's most hostile and remote terrain. TransCanada estimates it will cost $26 billion; Palin's consultants estimate nearly $40 billion. The pipeline would run from Alaska's North Slope to Alberta in Canada; secondary lines would take the gas to various points in the United States and Canada. Building such a pipeline had been a dream for decades. The rising cost and demand for energy injected new urgency into the proposal. When Palin was elected governor two years ago, she vowed to take on ExxonMobil Corp., ConocoPhillips and BP, the multinational energy companies that long dominated the state's biggest industry. Palin ousted fellow Republican Gov. Frank Murkowski, who negotiated a secret pipeline deal with the "Big Three" energy companies. That deal went nowhere. The new governor tackled the pipeline issue with gusto, meeting with representatives from all sides and assembling her own team of experts to draw up terms. Palin invited bidders to submit applications and offered the multimillion-dollar subsidy. Members of her team say that without the incentive, it might not have received any bids for the risky undertaking. Palin's team was led by Marty Rutherford, a widely respected energy specialist and veteran of state government. Rutherford solidified her status when, in 2005, she joined an exodus of Department of Natural Resources staff who felt Murkowski was selling out to the oil giants. What the Palin administration neglected to mention in its announcement of Rutherford's appointment was that in 2003, Rutherford left public service and worked for 10 months at the Anchorage-based Jade North lobbying firm. There she did $40,200 worth of work for Foothills Pipe Lines Alaska, Inc., a subsidiary of TransCanada. Foothills Pipe Lines Alaska Inc. paid Rutherford for expertise on topics including state legislation and funding related to gas commercialization, according to her 2003 lobbyist registration statement. Palin has said she wasn't bothered by that past work because it had occurred several years before. But Rutherford wouldn't have passed her new boss' own standards: Under ethics reforms the governor pushed through, Rutherford would have had to wait a year to jump from government service to a lobbying firm. Rutherford also has downplayed her work for Foothills. "I did a couple of projects for them, small projects," she told a state Senate committee examining the TransCanada bid earlier this year. While a partner, Rutherford said, she "realized that my heart was not in the private sector, it was in the public sector." At one point, Palin's pipeline team debated Rutherford's role, but concluded there was no problem, said Revenue Department Commissioner Pat Galvin, another team member. Patricia Bielawski, Rutherford's former partner at Jade North, spent last summer in Juneau, the state capital, serving as TransCanada's lead private lobbyist. While the Legislature debated — and ultimately approved — the TransCanada deal, Bielawski met with lawmakers and sat in on the public proceedings, several legislators said. Bielawski told AP that Rutherford never directly lobbied the Legislature for Foothills, and that Rutherford broke no rules. But others say it's a legitimate question. "I'm not saying someone's getting paid off for a sweetheart contract, but it's very hard to ignore that this is your former partner and your former client standing there before you," said Republican Sen. Lyda Green, a Palin critic who in August voted against awarding TransCanada the license. Tony Palmer, the TransCanada vice president who leads the company's Alaska gas pipeline effort, rejects the suggestion that his company benefited. "We have gained clearly no advantage from anything that Ms. Rutherford did for Foothills some five years ago on a very much unrelated topic," he said. Rutherford did not respond to interview requests. But McCain-Palin spokesman Griffin said Rutherford "had no decision-making role or authority," and contended that such matters were handled by others on the Palin pipeline team. TransCanada also had a connection to the team hired by the Palin administration to analyze the bid. Patrick Anderson, a former TransCanada executive, served as an outside consultant. In January 2007, Palin spoke the first of at least two times to Vice President Dick Cheney, the Bush administration's point person on energy issues, according to calendars obtained by the AP. Cheney's staff pressed the Palin administration to draw in the energy companies, said current and former state officials involved in those discussions. As the governor's approach unfolded in the spring of 2007, Palin said she saw problems if the firms that own the gas also owned the pipeline. They could manipulate the market or charge prohibitive fees to smaller exploration firms, discouraging competition. Several important requirements in the legislation were unpalatable to the big oil companies. In the talks under Murkowski, the firms asked that the rates for the gas production tax and royalties be fixed for 45 years; Palin refused to consider setting rates for that long. Under her process, pipeline firms had an advantage because they simply pass along taxes paid by oil and gas producers. Oil company officials warned lawmakers they wouldn't participate under those terms. Still, in a near unanimous vote, the Legislature passed the Alaska Gasline Inducement Act in May 2007, as generally written by Palin's pipeline team. Once the state issued its request for proposals on July 2, 2007, the level of communication between the government and potential bidders was supposed to decrease drastically. State lawyers advised public officials to keep their distance, and bidders were told to submit questions on a public website. But Palin had conversations with executives at most of the major potential bidders during that period, according to her calendars, which indicate that the pipeline was the subject of the discussions, or that the conversations occurred immediately after a briefing with Palin's pipeline team. TransCanada's Palmer described communication with state officials as nonexistent. According to the governor's official schedule, however, Palin called TransCanada President and CEO Hal Kvisle on Aug. 8, 2007. Palmer said the call was to clarify the bidding process. Griffin said that in keeping with legal guidance, Palin never spoke in any of the meetings about the competitive bidding process. By the Nov. 30 submission deadline, there were five applications. But the state disqualified four for failing to satisfy the bill's requirements. That left TransCanada. The Canadian giant had been pursuing an Alaska pipeline since at least 2004, when the company negotiated a deal with Rutherford that the state ended up shelving. While the details remain confidential, six people familiar with the terms told the AP that TransCanada was willing to do the work then without the large state subsidy. In testimony this July before the state Senate, Rutherford described the 2004 deal as presenting different trade-offs. Others who reviewed the deal think much of the $500 million will be wasted money. "Most definitely TransCanada got a sweetheart deal this time," said Republican Sen. Bert Stedman, who voted against the TransCanada license. "Where else could you get a $500 million reimbursement when you don't even have the financing to build the pipeline?" _ Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. Guidelines: You share in the USA TODAY community, so please keep your comments smart and civil. Don't attack other readers personally, and keep your language decent. Use the "Report Abuse" button to make a difference. You share in the USA TODAY community, so please keep your comments smart and civil. Don't attack other readers personally, and keep your language decent. Use the "Report Abuse" button to make a difference. Read more