In a 136-page ruling, Judge Vaughn Walker has declared Proposition 8, the measure banning same-sex marriage in California, unconstitutional under both the due-process and equal-protection clauses.

Says the ruling's conclusion:

"Proposition 8 fails to advance any rational basis in

singling out gay men and lesbians for denial of a marriage license.

Indeed, the evidence shows Proposition 8 does nothing more than

enshrine in the California Constitution the notion that opposite-

sex couples are superior to same-sex couples. Because California

has no interest in discriminating against gay men and lesbians, and

because Proposition 8 prevents California from fulfilling its

constitutional obligation to provide marriages on an equal basis,

the court concludes that Proposition 8 is unconstitutional."

And its remedies:

"Plaintiffs have demonstrated by overwhelming evidence

that Proposition 8 violates their due process and equal protection

rights and that they will continue to suffer these constitutional

violations until state officials cease enforcement of Proposition

8. California is able to issue marriage licenses to same-sex

couples, as it has already issued 18,000 marriage licenses to same-

sex couples and has not suffered any demonstrated harm as a result,

see FF 64-66; moreover, California officials have chosen not to

defend Proposition 8 in these proceedings."

“Because Proposition 8 is unconstitutional under both the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses, the court orders entry of judgment permanently enjoining its enforcement; prohibiting the official defendants from applying or enforcing Proposition 8 and directing the official defendants that all persons under their control or supervision shall not apply or enforce Proposition 8.”

Read the ruling below. We'll have further analysis soon…

FF_&_CL_FINAL