On Thursday, 15 December 2016 at 14:40:55 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote: > On Thursday, 15 December 2016 at 14:14:41 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: >> On Thursday, 15 December 2016 at 13:46:36 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote: >>> On Thursday, 15 December 2016 at 05:53:42 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote: >>>> >>>> Please, no :-( >>>> Mir needs betterC DMD FE >>> >>> What for ? >>> Are you using the compiler frontend ? >>> And the frontend is not only using the betterC subset. >>> So you could not be using it right now. >> >> Yes, I hope I will be able to use ldc/gdc on new targets, which do not have DRuntime. > > There is nothing wrong with dmd then. > Most of the code related to -betterC is in the glue code which means you need to bug the ldc and gdc devs. Either way, if they don't have a working druntime don't expect codegen to be valid for said target. If DMD FE is a betterC library, then DRuntime is not required to build a betterC D program with LDC/GCC, is no it?