“What some say are crosshairs are in fact the logo of the organization that originally posted it something called corruption central. They use the logo in many photos,” Roger Stone wrote. | Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP/Getty Images mueller investigation Stone apologizes to federal judge for posting photo of her with crosshairs

Days after a federal judge gagged Roger Stone from talking about the special counsel’s Russia investigation around U.S. District Court in Washington, the Republican strategist and provocateur on Monday posted a photo of the judge with crosshairs in the background.

“Through legal trickery Deep State hitman Robert Mueller has guaranteed that my upcoming show trial is before Judge Amy Berman Jackson , an Obama appointed Judge who dismissed the Benghazi charges again Hillary Clinton and incarcerated Paul Manafort prior to his conviction for any crime. #fixisin. Help me fight for my life at @StoneDefenseFund.com,” Stone wrote in the Instagram post, which has since been deleted.


Stone later submitted a formal apology to Jackson, but not before several hours during which he posted — and deleted — a slightly muted version of the original and tried to play down the symbolism.

“Please inform the Court that the photograph and comment today was improper and should not have been posted,” Stone said in a court filing signed by him and his lawyers. “I had no intention of disrespecting the Court and humbly apologize to the court for the transgression.”

The filing said that Stone recognized that the post was “improper” and “had it removed.” Stone’s Instagram post had painted Mueller as part of the “Deep State” and expressed his own innocence.

POLITICO Playbook newsletter Sign up today to receive the #1-rated newsletter in politics Email Sign Up By signing up you agree to receive email newsletters or alerts from POLITICO. You can unsubscribe at any time. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Stone, whom the special counsel has charged with lying to Congress and obstructing the Russia investigation, appeared to be reacting to Jackson’s order on Friday in which she said she’d take “no action” on his objection that the case should have been randomly assigned to a judge instead of being earmarked specifically to her.

Mueller’s team had deemed Stone’s case related to another in front of Jackson that involves 11 Russian military officials accused of hacking the Democratic Party’s computer systems to sabotage the 2016 election. The two cases share common search warrants and evidence, the special counsel’s office said in its initial court filings accompanying the Stone indictment.

The same day that Jackson gagged Stone and his lawyers, the special counsel’s prosecutors suggested in a filing that they might have discovered “Stone’s communications” with Wikileaks, which made stolen Democratic emails public before the 2016 election.

The photo illustration of Jackson appears to be taken from a conspiracy site that contains photos of judges and politicians with crosshairs in the background and the words “corruption central” alongside them.

Stone’s original Instagram post was later replaced with a similar photo and wording but without the crosshairs. The second post was deleted, as well. Stone told The Washington Post that the photograph was not posted by him but a “volunteer” who helps with social media.

“A photo of Judge Jackson posted on my Instagram has been misrepresented,” Stone wrote in a subsequent statement on Instagram. “This was a random photo taken from the internet. Any inference that this was meant to somehow threaten the Judge or disrespect court is categorically false.”

Stone posted again half an hour later on Instagram, further defending his original post.

“What some say are crosshairs are in fact the logo of the organization that originally posted it something called corruption central. They use the logo in many photos,” Stone wrote.

Reacting to the posts, Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) wrote on Twitter: “This image is stomach turning. The real Roger Stone — criminally threatening a federal judge. Another Trump associate demonstrates contempt for the rule of law & the desperate need for accountability.”

If a judge interprets the photo as a threat from Stone, he could land in custody, since threatening a federal judge constitutes a federal crime, according to several notable lawyers who commented on Twitter.

“This is both very troubling and remarkably stupid on Stone’s part,” tweeted Randall Eliason, a professor at George Washington University Law School. “Twitter has already suspended his account and this may land him in custody.”

Steve Vladeck, a professor from University of Texas School of Law, who linked to the statute, wrote on Twitter : “This. Is. Not. Okay.”

Darren Samuelsohn contributed to this report.