A group of Democratic lawmakers are seeking a criminal investigation of Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Scott Pruitt Edward (Scott) Scott PruittJuan Williams: Swamp creature at the White House Science protections must be enforceable Conspicuous by their absence from the Republican Convention MORE following a slew of reports that Pruitt may have used his position to benefit himself and his family.

Reps. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.), Don Beyer (D-Va.), Gerry Connolly Gerald (Gerry) Edward ConnollyJudge issues nationwide injunction against Postal Service changes House panel advances bill to ban Postal Service leaders from holding political positions Shakespeare Theatre Company goes virtual for 'Will on the Hill...or Won't They?' MORE (D-Va.), Jamie Raskin Jamin (Jamie) Ben RaskinOn The Money: House panel pulls Powell into partisan battles | New York considers hiking taxes on the rich | Treasury: Trump's payroll tax deferral won't hurt Social Security House panel pulls Powell into partisan battles over pandemic Shakespeare Theatre Company goes virtual for 'Will on the Hill...or Won't They?' MORE (D-Md.), Rubin Gallego (D-Ariz.) and Pramila Jayapal Pramila JayapalDHS opens probe into allegations at Georgia ICE facility Progressive Caucus co-chair: Whistleblower complaint raises questions about 'entire detention system' Buttigieg, former officials added to Biden's transition team MORE (D-Wash.) jointly requested FBI Director Christopher Wrey and acting Assistant Attorney General John Cronan open an investigation into Pruitt in a letter sent Friday, highlighting their grave concerns with the EPA head.

ADVERTISEMENT

"EPA Administrator Pruitt has used his public office and official, taxpayer-funded resources for the personal gain of himself and his family, in violation of federal law," the lawmakers wrote in their letter.

Their request follows reporting this week that Pruitt had his executive scheduler request a meeting with top leadership at fast food company Chick-fil-A with the purpose of securing a job for his wife, Marlyn Pruitt.

Pruitt and his scheduler's requests in the early days of his tenure were documented in internal EPA emails released this month in troves of emails to the Sierra Club through a Freedom of Information Act request.

"Administrator Pruitt directly, and admittedly, used EPA resources to attempt to secure a job for his wife," the letter to the FBI director read.

"At the very least, we know that federal ethics laws bar public officials from using their position or staff for private gain. Administrator Pruitt has certainly done just that."

Pruitt didn't defend the meeting he set up with Chick-fil-A and appeared to admit to its purpose in an interview he gave with a Nextstar reporter Wednesday.

"Look, my wife is an entrepreneur herself, I love, she loves, we love Chick-fil-A as a, as a franchise of faith," Pruitt said in the interview. "And it's one of the best in the country, and so, that's something we're very excited about. … So, and we need more of them in Tulsa and we need more of them across the country."

In an email to Dan Cathy, Chick-fil-A chairman and president, Pruitt's scheduler asked if he would meet with Pruitt to discuss “a potential business opportunity.”

According to the Post, Pruitt himself later spoke on the phone with someone from the company's legal department to ask about the possibility of his wife becoming a Chick-fil-A franchisee.

A company representative confirmed the conversation to the Post.

The lawmakers say the arrangement that Pruitt sought is potentially illegal and politically corrupt, as he used his position of authority as EPA head to seek financial benefits for his spouse.

The news comes as Pruitt is embroiled in a number of other scandals related to his ethics and use of taxpayer money, including his rental of a $50-a-night condo from the wife of a prominent energy lobbyist who has lobbied the EPA on behalf of clients.

The lawmakers allege the actions show Pruitt crossing an ethical and potentially criminal line.

"His actions related to his wife’s employment and the quid-pro-quo condo situation with industry lobbyists may have crossed a line into criminal conduct punishable by fines or even by time in prison," they wrote.