Disqualification from office over corruption allegations is the most serious political ramification yet of 2016 leak

Pakistan’s supreme court has removed the prime minister, Nawaz Sharif, from office in a unanimous verdict over corruption allegations that will further upset the country’s unstable political landscape.

The verdict by the five-member court caps a year of political controversy over corruption allegations unleashed by the 2016 Panama Papers leak.

The governing party, the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), said Sharif had stepped down immediately. The party must now choose an interim prime minister to be accepted by parliament.

The ruling will throw the governing party and the country at large into turmoil ahead of elections due next year.

The 10-year disqualification of Sharif cut short the third tenure of a man who has been a leading figure in Pakistani politics for nearly three decades since his first term from 1990 to 1993.

It is the most serious political ramification yet of the Panama Papers leak, which detailed financial dealings of the Panamanian law firm Mossack Fonseca.

The papers linked Sharif’s children to the purchase of London property through offshore companies in the British Virgin Islands in the early 1990s. At that time the children were minors, and the purchase is assumed to have been made by Sharif.

Last year, Sharif told parliament that his family wealth had been acquired legally in the decades before he entered politics.

Hassan Askari Rizvi, a political analyst, said the judgment had been expected. The big challenge for the PML-N party would be to maintain unity while finding a candidate who would be acceptable both within party ranks and to a majority of parliament, he said.



At least in the short term, the ruling is a big win for the opposition leader, former cricketer Imran Khan, who has been relentlessly calling for Sharif’s removal since the beginning of the scandal. “Khan’s political fortune has improved after this ruling, and he will try to cash in on this,” Rizvi said.

Khan called for a public rally on Sunday, in a press conference after the verdict. “Our struggle proves that mighty people in our country can also be held accountable now. Until and unless these powerful people of the country are held accountable there is no future of Pakistan.”

Imran Khan on the Panama Papers: ‘The coalition of the corrupt help each other’ Read more

Local media reported on Friday minor clashes between activists affiliated with PML-N and the opposition PTI party in several locations around the country.

In its ruling, the court referred all material gathered in the investigation to the court of the national accountability bureau, and recommended opening cases against Sharif, his three children, Mariam, Hassan and Hussain, his son-in-law Muhammad Safdar and his finance minister Ishaq Dar.

Ali Zafar, a barrister and former president of the supreme court bar association, said: “We are currently without a government because the constitution doesn’t envision the disqualification of the prime minister.”

Sharif is the second head of government to have lost office in the Panama Papers scandal, which in April 2016 forced out the Icelandic prime minister, Sigmundur Davíð Gunnlaugsson, after he and his wife were revealed to have held bonds in collapsed Icelandic banks through an offshore company.

Dozens of senior government figures worldwide were among those identified in the leaked files as the controllers or beneficiaries of offshore interests. The UK’s HMRC placed 22 people under investigation and it was reported last month that German tax authorities had paid several million euros to acquire its own copy of the information.

The case against the Sharif family took a turn in July when forensic experts cast doubt on documents central to the defence of the prime minister’s daughter, Mariam Nawaz Sharif, who claimed she was only a trustee of the companies that bought the London flats.

The documents were dated to 2006 but appear to have used a font, Microsoft Calibri, that was available only from 2007, raising suspicions that they were forged.

“During the course of the proceedings, certain documents had been given, which were blatantly false, and on the basis of those documents the supreme court could conclude that there has been forgery. On that basis, they have the right to disqualify the prime minister,” said Zafar.

Still, some might perceive the ruling to be political, said Asma Jahangir, a prominent lawyer. “The judgment has caused cracks in the walls of supreme court because it is so unique. It will create doubts about whether it is a political judgment,” she said.

The information minister, Maryam Aurnagzeb, said: “Some verdicts are announced by the court and some are given by the people of Pakistan. In the political, democratic and historic perspective of Pakistan, it is a sad judgment. PML-N is the biggest political party of Pakistan and will remain so.”



A PML-N spokesperson said Sharif had stepped down immediately, despite “serious reservations” about the judgment. He said the principles of a fair trial had been gravely violated.

“History will make its own judgment after this verdict. And Nawaz Sharif will be successful in the court of God and people of Pakistan,” he said.

Transparency International and Global Witness said UK authorities must now work to establish whether the Sharif family still own the London properties, and consider seizure proceedings if they were found to be bought with the proceeds of crime.

“When these leaks first came out the UK government promised to clean up the property market to show the world that ‘there is no home for the corrupt in Britain’ – it’s time they made good on that promise,” said Naomi Hirst, senior campaigner at Global Witness.

Additional reporting by Waqar Gillani