SCP-1200's image has been taken down, but the file (which is a manipulation of the source image) remains on the page. I do not have the means (a flickr account) to contact Andrew Scott for usage rights. Being the author of the article myself, I don't really care if it gets taken down permanently.

SCP-1207 is a clear modification of Luis Camnitzer's "This is a mirror. You are a written sentence. 1966". There are tons of these modifications on other image hosting sites, but that doesn't make this any more legal. I suggest a take down.

SCP-1209 Twittwer @scienceporn is most likely to own the rights, though I have no idea. After a long search I could not find a definite owner.

SCP-1229 was ripped from a youtube video. I'm sure the same copyright law applies, though. All the same, I'm taking the image down and contacting the author to clear this all up. resolved

SCP-1239 is likely to belong to © 2011-2013 America Eikaiwa Gakuin link, but I cannot confirm this. The image code has been removed nonetheless for lack of attribution.

Scantron's 001 proposal's image comes from here: http://www.cfvigor1962.com/index.html Doesn't look like the site has been updated recently, but it's unclear. -weizhong

I couldn't find the source of the 411's image: it is used all over the internet, and is never attributed to any source. However, I found a bigger version with a copyright message in the corner: http://www.blogas.lt/uploads/e/erelioakys/113849.jpg . The message is unintelligeble, so it doesn't help with locating the source. Should the currently used image be replaced with the one with the message, or should it be removed altogether as being copyrighted, even if we don't know who's the owner? -anqxyr

The 427's second image was made over ten years ago by the Centre for Cetacean Conservation, based in Santiago. I couldn't find any information on the CCC, or confirm that this organisation still exists today, so I left the image be. -anqxyr

SCP-806 earliest entry is from this defunct company. It has been edited and reused in many places around the internet. I left it up for now. -Mortte

457's first image is credit by multiple source to Grigoris Siamidis/Reuters. However, I couldn't find a way to contact Grigoris Siamidis, and the image does not appear to exist on the Reuters website. Left the image up for now. -anqxyr

212's second image has so far not been sourced. The closest thing I have found was a person's profile picture on a German website. The first image was used in some news articles, but the source is also unclear. Both remain for now. -Waterfire

482 is from here (Warning: NSFW). Removed the image and contacted the site. The author was not notified as they have deleted their account. Resolved-ish: The owner gave permission, as long the image is replaced with the version where the watermark was not removed. That sounds to me like a reasonable request, so that's what I did. If any Staff disagrees, they can revert. -anqxyr

517's first image is from here. The blog hasn't been updated in 4 years, and there's no contact info. Left the image up. -anqxyr

SCP-151 can't be verified with tineye right now. -weizhong

420's image comes from this site, who in turn took it from a fraudulent ebay lot. We're probably fine keeping it as is.

SCP-100 - SCP-150 were done before the updated discussion page template and before we were supposed to PM the authors and before we were supposed to use google. Also many of the non CC images had an owner who was not possible to contact. -Devereaux

Is there an owner-contact form letter already drafted? -Mortte- Yeah, Accel sent me one, I think… hold on, I'll link it… here. Modify it as needed. -Montala

700 uses two images from an older online game called 99 Rooms. No contact information is provided, nor did I see a copyright notice on the bottom of their mainsite. It seems to be the origin of the pictures. The third image on 700 cannot be found via either tineye or Google images. -Montala

701 is from a Japanese fashion show by designer Jun Takahasi / Undercover, link here: [http://www.undercoverism.com]. Fair warning: the website is damnably hard to navigate. It seems to piggyback off of or replicate other websites as a background and uses a modular, windowed navigation. For instance, it took me to Wikipedia, vimeo, and some random Japanese site as backgrounds. Took me an age to figure out you could move around the windows with their stuff in them. Unable to find either original picture or contact information.

- Montala

194 is…problematic. I couldn't email the original owner, because the email link on his website is broken. The site is here: http://www.simonschubert.de/skulpturen.html Not entirely sure what to do. -weizhong

SCP-1109's image has been removed. Original owners contacted, waiting reply. -Dr. Poke

SCP-118's image came from here before it 404'd. If the link is fixed soon, then we'll take down the image.

216's source page is this now broken link. Left the image put. -Waterfire

1851-EX's source page is here. It's under a Public Domain-US license. It's Public Domain in the States, but other countries may have other rules.

197's image is from here, but the original owner is German. Anybody speak German here? -weizhong

Both of 112's images come from a Russian webpage. I need someone else (who speaks Russian) to investigate those. -Devereaux

Both images are from Flickr, by different photographers. The first one is from here, and the second one is from here. I'll leave contacting them to you. -anqxyr

Apparently the author already did. -Devereaux

115's image comes from this (probably) Polish website. I need someone who speaks Polish to investigate further. -Devereaux

119's image comes from Cnet, and I'm wondering if I should even try to pursue getting permission. Up to this point I can't even find any contact info.

Can't find 218's sources through Tineye. One was used in some science journals, the other is some sort of Photoshop thing. Leaving it up for now. -Waterfire

SCP-2112 has a whole buttload of issues with it. http://pastebin.com/bkm7MGft -weizhong

Voct has informed me that 077's image is a photoshopped image by the original uploader. The question is obviously, what do we do about it? For now, I'm leaving it up, since the original source of the photo cannot be verified, but I think that it'd be better to get some sort of replacement, possibly photoshopped by a site member. -weizhong

SCP-206 has 21 images, which the author his helping me source. A list can be found in the last tab of my sandbox, last tab. -Waterfire.

Important: Some people in #19 are concerned that the removal of an image is dependent on who is doing the removal. This specifically concerns the images for which no specific source could be located. Personally, I leave those images up. Can we all agree on one way to threat those images? -anqxyr This one got addressed; we leave images up if we can't find a source. -weizhong

586's pic is from here, but the description identifies it as being from a tv broadcast, so obviously the flickr user doesn't hold any rights (but for what it's worth, he released it under CC). Also the image have been used all over the internet by news sites etc. Really not sure what to do. Left the image up for now. -anqxyr

591's image is a painting by Adolf Hitler (proof). The wikipedia article about Hitler's paintings doesn't mention anything about copyrights. Left the image up. -anqxyr

595 is a photo of a Public Domain photo. While the depicted photo is Public Domain, the photo itself may or may not be under copyright. The source of the photo is unknown. -anqxyr

588 is from here. Removed and contacted. Update: they replied. This particular image wasn't made by them, they found it on ebay. They suggested they scan a similar coin and give us permission to use that instead. Replacing an image with another requires either author's or Staff approval, and the author haven't been active since 2009. I don't really want to ask them to make an image for us, only for us to then not use it, so I'd like to hear from Staff before I reply to them. -anqxyr

1000's pic has a somewhat shaky status. On the one hand, it's still very much under copyright (proof), on the other hand it's been widely used by everyone over the years, to the point that the entire footage is available on youtube. -anqxyr

1035 is from here. The author haven't been active for 4 years, and there's no contact info. -anqxyr

223 and 224 both are from shopping sites, but I can't pinpoint the exact source as they are both used on multiple sites. 225 is an edited Public Domain image. -Waterfire