When it comes to the economy opinions are like -- well, you know -- and everyone has one, and there are a lot of them spouting off; therein lies the rub.

Sound economic ideas are sometimes embittered by suspicion of the motives of those who propose it. Two recurring, and seemingly polar opposite examples are economic fairness and economic freedoms.

In today's Republican party, none of the elected representatives would dare speak of economic fairness. Republicans are deeply suspicious of those who speak of economic fairness, viewing all those who do as big government advocates.

A Democrat representative could not as readily support economic fairness either, because of skepticism of motive. Primary supporters of Democrats in recent primary and general elections have been people on government assistance, or those on the lower end of the wage scale. The support that any Democrat representatives might give to any government assistance program or welfare program--in the name of economic fairness--could be discounted by the cynical Republicans as a big government intrusion into the economy. Why? Because those assistance and welfare programs are taxpayer funded, any additional spending from those programs comes from additional taxation, and that taxation directly effects the economy.

There is however an even deeper well of Democrat suspicion over economic freedoms. In today's Democrat party, none of the elected representatives would dare speak of making the economy freer. Democrats are extremely suspicious of those who speak of economic freedom, viewing all those who do as anarchist capitalist.

A Republican representative could not as eagerly support making the economy freer either, because of skepticism of motive. Primary supporters of Republicans in recent primary and general elections have been Wall Street, and big publicly traded corporations. The support that any Republican representatives might give to Wall Street or big publicly traded corporations--in the name of economic freedom--may be discounted by cynical Democrats as anarchist capitalists intrusions into the economy. Why? Some big publicly traded corporations and Wall Street had to be bailed out by the government--because they totally sucked at making a profit, and any bailout spending from government comes from taxation, and that taxation directly effects the economy.

The sad truth when it comes to the economy, both the Republican and Democrat representatives are ideologically driven, intellectually dishonest, and their primary achievements are towing their party's line. They both receive campaign funding from lobbyist, special interest groups, Wall Street, and big publicly traded corporations. That funding influences economic policies. They're spouting off. Because power once given to the government or its agency's is almost always expanded to the limits of the laws word--and most of the time it goes far beyond. So Republicans and Democrats will always be suspicious of one another when it comes to economic policy making, and the way the other political parties policy making decisions are implemented into the economy.

So, here's a solution to the fairness and freedoms quagmire. Take the money generated in the economy by "We the people", and let "We the people" decide how best to use that money in the pursuit of fairness and freedom in the economy. One way to accomplish this is through the implementation of a new economic model. Humanatapilism, pronounced Hu-MAN-ah-TAP-il-ism, is a new economic model that combines the best aspects of our humanity with the best aspects of free-market capitalism, to create a fairer and freer economy. This new economic model, humanatapilism, gives "We the people" the power to direct our economy. This new found power in the economy will result in a fairer and freer economy, and a farrier and freer economy has the ability to raise the quality of life of ourselves, and that of our fellow human being, to new heights.