A London family has worked tirelessly uncovering a well-evolved local authority malpractice. To help save budgets and reduce workloads, MPs conspire with their council’s childcare services, schools, and even their local NHS. They exploit the formative age of targeted children and fraudulently abuse the UK’s welfare system.

Our vast network fighting abuse of power has helped with strategy and leverage. Some of the perpetrators have raised their hands to admit their guilt and expose their colleagues.

This family took steps to stop their children from being used this way. But, part of this abuse of power is a multiple cross-department collaboration to avoid accountability. Holding these people to account became impossible. The only way to win their fight was to create a similarly large network. But with some key differences. No expense was spared employing elite professionals to prove the truth.

There is always much irony when the truth doesn’t fit a false reality. This dishonest MP unwittingly exposed their involvement. To stop this family from revealing this, this MP used their council to destroy this family’s lives. Many lies lead to more lies until there were too many holes. It resulted in Bexley Council having to admit their guilt and attempt to settle out of court. This family is now planning the court hearing, starting with this corrupt politician.

Summary

The London Borough of Bexley has a day-to-day working culture of prioritising the smooth running of its public services, over the wellbeing of its residents. To achieve this, it will use any resource at its disposal. Even if it means abusing some of their minority residents. This family was targeted because their children were raised to be selfless, and they are of mixed-race heritage. The MP helped this council’s childcare services take advantage of this. This family was driven to find the reason why minorities are abused this way by UK institutions. They created an entire organisation to help win their fight against this London establishment. This organisation has evolved into part of a group educating how a New World Economy is needed because greed and discrimination are normalised in today’s way of life. This publication has mainly horrified people who work for UK local authorities, but for all the wrong reasons. Some are aware of this malpractice and are showing how much they hate seeing it exposed. Viseum is one of the companies sponsoring this group. They are using their social media and face recognition technologies to identify them.

Quotes

A UK government senior civil servant, “We have also seen public servants abuse people’s children like this over their religious and political views. Children in their formative years are being indoctrinated by teachers, health, and social care workers into doing a lot of immoral and damaging things. I find it tragic for a non-white child to live through it for their family to publish this horror. The UK’s social services can no longer pretend this is not happening.”

A police sergeant and front desk officers at a Metropolitan Police Station, “This story is an exact mirror of what has happened to several other minority families. But, with some key differences on how it has been exposed. Their children must be extremely confused, but no other family has been strong enough to hang onto reality and find a way to live through so many lies.”

Examples of immoral brainwashing

In April 2019, the offending staff at this council became desperate to save their careers. To exonerate themselves, they brainwashed this child to think they had autism. They fast-tracked the waiting list for NHS autism tests, from over 2 years to 1 month. They offered this child financial benefits to encourage them to have an autism test urgently. This child considered suicide because they were then forced to convince their Mum and Dad to agree they should have the autism test. This council hadn’t realised the strength of this child fighting back, which created Pier to Prom.

The mother is a respected academic from Asia, and the father is a well-known solutions innovator from London. They were living overseas but in the year 2000, they were sponsored by this MP’s office to start their family and business in the London Borough of Bexley. In 2012, their children started secondary school, and they experienced abuse of power to the extreme. In 2014, one of their children was violently attacked. For a further year, they were continuously victimised by their teachers. The same bully, from a well-known problematic family, was allowed to continuously target this child. But this isn’t all, in 2017 this child tried to start again at another school. But the abuse of power worsened more. Their parents’ calls for help astonishingly resulted in this child being abused to help a family with special needs.

We have tracked several meetings between Bexley Council, Oxleas NHS and Haberdashers’ Aske’s Crayford Academy school. All agreed to use Mum and Dad’s vulnerable and compliant child to help the family with special needs, who were patients of Oxleas NHS. On 06/04/2018 Sarah Robinson of Oxleas NHS was recorded giving this child a therapy session for them “to become independent”. This was to get them to leave their Mum and Dad and live with the family with special needs. That same day this child cried out several times to their Mum and Dad, “I am independent” whilst leaving them to go and live with the family with special needs.

In May 2019, MP David Evennett unwittingly helped reveal this abuse of power as an outlawed technique. He inadvertently helped this family create what we have proudly called Pier to Prom. It produced court quality evidence of Bexley Council’s fraudulent use of the welfare system.

Proving their parents’ 6 years of calls for help were never looked at by anyone at this council, this child gave their parents’ letter, warning about the family with special needs, to the family with special needs, who ironically presented it to this council and it was acted upon immediately. This home was then deemed unsafe for Mum and Dad’s child to live.

Worsening Human Rights Abuse

Examples of how far this abuse of power goes in this council, Mum and Dad’s solicitors have legalised recorded detail of the following events:

21/06/2018 – Mum and Dad sent a safeguarding risk warning to all of Bexley Council’s public services about the family with special needs. All of these organisations ignored this call for help.

about the family with special needs. All of these organisations ignored this call for help. 29/06/2018 just 8 days later – Bexley Council conspired with Haberdashers’ Aske’s Crayford Academy and Oxleas NHS, to formally put Mum and Dad’s child into the home of the family with special needs without any assessments on either home.

the home of the family with special needs any assessments on either home. 02/07/2018 – Susan Gallop from Bexley Council tried to persuade Mum and Dad to hand their parental rights over to the head of the family with special needs. Still without any assessments.

any assessments. 25/07/2018 – Bexley Council acted on Mum and Dad’s safeguarding risk warning and produced a Family and Home Assessment Report on the home of the family with special needs, proving Mum and Dad’s safeguarding risk warning is real. The child received a life-threatening size bruise to their face. Bexley Council apologised to Mum and Dad and attempted to extract the child from the home of the family with special needs.

10/08/2018 – Bexley Council created a highly corrupt “Child & Family Assessment Report” containing 11 counts of falsified information.

15/08/2018 just 55 days after Mum and Dad sent their safeguarding risk warning – Bexley Council attempted to silence Mum and Dad by threatening to take away their youngest child. Using the falsified assessment report, Bexley Council created a highly corrupt “Initial Child Protection Conference” containing 13 additional counts of falsified information. This was driven using falsified information from Sarah Robinson of Oxleas NHS, who ceased working for the NHS when Mum and Dad reported this to the police.

Questioning Abuse of Power

The actions on 10/08/2018 and 15/08/2018 were so that all of Bexley Council’s public services could conspire to have this case taken over by other members of staff. Although working in the same office, this meant they were no longer responsible for it. This broke each member of this family. This council’s immoral and unethical actions, effectively washed their hands to hide their mistakes. This was to avoid having to explain why they all ignored the safeguarding risk warning until it was too late. Mum and Dad’s legal team then asked Bexley Council the following questions:

How else can Bexley Council explain the unprecedented remarkable speed of these actions, other than a cross-department conspiracy to hide multiple mistakes? Is it possible that Bexley Council has, in fact, discriminated against this family, by making their decisions based on helping the family with special needs, as opposed to considering the human rights of this mixed-race family? Why was the safeguarding risk warning acted on immediately when the family with special needs presented it, but not when Mum and Dad first sent it?

Mum and Dad’s human rights solicitors proved that under these circumstances, any child in their formative years will remember their own experiences of their parents. Children will also believe what they are being told by whoever has daily access to them. The most natural and logical reaction for any child under this much duress will be confusion. This will create and compound anxiety, and eventually cause enough conflict to create voices and hallucinations. This is what has happened to this child. When they started living with the family with special needs, this child had many emergencies involving the police and hospital A&E, because of self-harming. Their 100% immaculate school attendance suddenly dropped astonishingly below acceptable standards.

Landmark Legal Case – UK Council’s Human Rights Abuse

Compelling Evidence – With diaries all through this ordeal, Mum and Dad recorded, documented and legalised with their solicitors, all communication with staff from this council’s public services. This has amassed many years of their child’s true feelings. Many thousands of phone calls, meetings, letters and emails, all with Mum and Dad using the words “please help treat our child”. Verifying everything, they now have irrefutable evidence of this council’s abuse of power, proving council staff doing their minimum to keep the child in their workflow, but never having any intent to help this child.

This family exploited how being institutionalised often controls what and how people think. It also often fuels instinct to abuse power. They published many voice recordings of senior and frontline staff at this council reasoning how they would wrongfully use this family to save council resources, to help one of their families with special needs. Mum and Dad have taken legal action for professional negligence and incompetence, against all perpetrating organisations from this council. Mum and Dad asked each of these organisations to settle this case privately using mutually selected ombudsmen. They also offered to pay for their costs but none accepted this offer.

UK Authorities – These 3 regulatory bodies are following this case in support of this family’s human rights:

On 20/01/2020 the Office of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards advised us, we will need to pursue the legal remedy available for that breach. If a court finding is made against this MP, then they could open an inquiry into a potential breach of the Code of Conduct.

On 31/01/2020 the investigating officer for Conservative Party Complaints advised us to seek legal action for what is clearly a complex matter.

On 28/05/2020 the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman published, “This matter would need to be addressed by a court.” Mum and Dad were advised how this publication usually delivers good success imminently in these cases. We then tracked meetings between several UK government senior civil servants, Bexley Council and members of the wider community involved in this case. We are confident that all perpetrators were instructed to correct the harm they have done. This family took advantage of this noticeable change to begin getting their lives back on track. This will be used in court to show how this corrupt politician has admitted their guilt

Perpetrating Organisations:

Bexley Children’s Social Care Services: Director Jacky Tiotto, Fiona Cisneros, Donna Hillocks, Martin Clement, Jodie Eggleston, Linda Brown, Susan Gallop, Anne Day, Louise Westron.

Oxleas NHS. It is common knowledge that the NHS lack specialist training to treat mental health: Clinical Director Lesley French, Ui Peng Khoo, Kate Doherty, Reshad Soobratty, Sarah Robinson, Mariam Miller.

First School – Bexleyheath Academy. With a reputation for bullying, victimisation and discrimination against minority-race children: Principal Carl Wakefield, Vice Principal Mark Lewis, D Sweeney.

Second School – Haberdashers’ Aske’s Crayford Academy. One of the biggest culprits which has inflicted the most cruelty to this child: Principal Richard Farrow, Vice Principal Sian Evans, Safeguarding and Welfare Officer J O’Brien.



Many of these perpetrators are being tracked because they have fled this council to distance themselves from this case. If their child commits suicide, Mum and Dad will have the legal powers to take action against them for manslaughter.

Winning Strategy Unveiled

Because of the complexity in cross-department collaboration, nobody thought that Mum and Dad could use the law to expose this council. In 2017, their child signed a contract with their family solicitors for them to seek justice in their case. This is what they have been doing as one of the key empowered law firms fighting this case.

Mum and Dad’s strategy comes from a network of sponsors. A key strategy was this network’s use of Dad to encourage everyone to think that he was leading this fight. Dad remained the most vocal to encourage the council to solely target him. Bexley Council gave Mum and Dad’s child false information to only humiliate and discredit him, “your Dad is saying this” and “your Dad is saying that” and “it’s horrible having a Dad like yours”. This worked. This family’s solicitors said, “Pier to Prom would have been impossible without this strategy.” And, “The irony of this child being allowed to show their love to some of their family but not to Dad, just because everyone thinks that he is their biggest threat.” To highlight this, at one point we announced that Mum was leading this fight for her child’s human rights. This child was then stopped from showing their love to their mother.

REF: VISCSW8749 – COUNCILS’ ABUSE OF POWER UNCOVERED. Viseum® Community SafetyWatch® is one of this mixed-race family’s sponsors.

Since July 2017 our website has been publishing this family’s achievements. We have evidence of many people inside Bexley Council reading and talking about it. Many wanted to find out if their breach of human rights led to any of this family’s children committing suicide. Bexley Council replied to this family’s start of legal action with words to the effect, “We have no record of the meetings that you have recorded and these meetings’ minutes that you witnessed being taken were not taken.” And, “We are going to deny all of your claims because the amount of financial settlement you are asking for is too much.”

This shows how the abuse of power has become normal in today’s way of life. It is the world’s first publicised escape for a family from one of the UK’s most corrupt councils. Press packs include case files against all perpetrating organisations with 6 years of correlated, verified and legalised evidence of their abuse of power: