Download raw source

MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.13.216 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 10:41:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <A575F0F1-DF3B-4D70-95F5-C6BDA5AE83A3@mcguirewoods.com> References: <A575F0F1-DF3B-4D70-95F5-C6BDA5AE83A3@mcguirewoods.com> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 13:41:15 -0400 Delivered-To: john.podesta@gmail.com Message-ID: <CAE6FiQ-A_n37fNN0Af00iB3tDPnBrmpEZsBg9V+broY+wCHGtA@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: From: John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com> To: "Hodges, James H." <jhodges@mcguirewoods.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11412ba4d3f498052009090d --001a11412ba4d3f498052009090d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Thanks. I'll try to ck in on this. On Friday, September 18, 2015, Hodges, James H. <jhodges@mcguirewoods.com> wrote: > Hi, John. Great having you in South Carolina a few weeks ago. I wanted to > raise a concern about the new ozone regulations the White House is > considering. It seems to me there is an opportunity for the politics to > align with the Presidents environmental goals- we cut emissions without > impacting the economy adversely. I worry that the White House will overplay > it's hand, and the result will be an issue for Republicans against HRC and > the other Democrats on the ballot- particularly those in swing states. It > strikes me this is an area where some compromise can be struck. In the > matter of full disclosure, I do work with manufacturers and am sympathetic > to their position, but also think there is a solution that works for all, > particularly our 16 candidates. Hope this is on your radar screen. > > Sent from my iPad --001a11412ba4d3f498052009090d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks. I'll try to ck in on this.<br><br>On Friday, September 18, 2015= , Hodges, James H. <<a href=3D"mailto:jhodges@mcguirewoods.com">jhodges@= mcguirewoods.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style= =3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi, John= . Great having you in South Carolina a few weeks ago. I wanted to raise a c= oncern about the new ozone regulations the White House is considering. It s= eems to me there is an opportunity for the politics to align with the Presi= dents environmental goals- we cut emissions without impacting the economy a= dversely. I worry that the White House will overplay it's hand, and the= result will be an issue for Republicans against HRC and the other Democrat= s on the ballot- particularly those in swing states. It strikes me this is = an area where some compromise can be struck. In the matter of full disclosu= re, I do work with manufacturers and am sympathetic to their position, but = also think there is a solution that works for all, particularly our 16 cand= idates. Hope this is on your radar screen.<br> <br> Sent from my iPad</blockquote> --001a11412ba4d3f498052009090d--