Kanye West’s Saint Pablo Tour came to an abrupt end last November when he cut his Sacramento show short after ranting about Beyoncé, JAY-Z, Hillary Clinton, and more. The tour was canceled, and shortly after, he was hospitalized. Today, West and his touring company Very Good Touring, Inc. filed a $10 million lawsuit stemming from his hospitalization and that tour’s cancellation, THR reports. The complaint, obtained by Pitchfork, alleges that syndicates of the insurance company Lloyd’s of London refused to pay out insurance claims stemming from the canceled tour. West is suing for breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealings. Find the complaint below. Lloyd’s of London declined to comment to Pitchfork.

The complaint notes that West submitted a claim to the insurance company on November 23—two days after he canceled the tour and one day after he was hospitalized for a “debilitating medical condition.” More than eight months later, the claim is in limbo—the company hasn’t paid him, and they haven’t said whether or not they intend to pay him. The suit states that employees at the insurance company “suggested that they may deny coverage of the claim on the unsupportable contention that use of marijuana by Kanye caused the medical condition.”

The lawsuit also outlines West’s hospitalization and the insurers’ demand for proof that he was, indeed, unfit to tour. It’s noted that he was hospitalized for eight days, and after he was released, he remained under a physician’s full-time care and supervision. He is still being treated by the same primary physician from his November hospitalization, who delivered testimony that West was unfit to tour. An “independent medical examination” was then retained by insurers, and their doctor concurred that West was in no condition to tour. Then, the insurers allegedly demanded that West be presented for an examination under oath.

Elsewhere in the complaint, it’s alleged that insurers shared “privileged, private, and personal information” about West to the media. West’s lawyer writes that the company’s purported plans to plant private information was “a move intended to intimidate or dissuade [West] from filing suit” and calls their actions “an egregious violation of written non-disclosure agreements.” The complaint states: