Pakistan makes move against Hafiz Saeed after years of pressure from US and India over atrocities that killed 166 people

This article is more than 3 years old

This article is more than 3 years old

Pakistan has ordered house arrest for the Islamist cleric Hafiz Saeed, who is accused by the US and India of masterminding the 2008 attacks on the Indian financial capital Mumbai that killed 166 people.

The move came after years of pressure and could help ease recently escalating tensions between the nuclear-armed neighbours. Saeed’s continued freedom has long infuriated India.

The US offered $10m (£8m) for information leading to the arrest and conviction of Saeed, who heads the Muslim charity Jamaat-ud-Dawa (JuD). Washington says JuD is a front for the Pakistan-based militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT).

“A large police team arrived [at JuD headquarters] and told us that Hafiz Saeed would be placed under house arrest,” Nadeem Awan, a spokesman for the group based in the eastern city of Lahore, told Reuters.

An interior ministry source confirmed Saeed and the other men “are under house arrest” and on the exit control list, meaning they could not leave the country. India’s foreign ministry did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

It was unclear why Pakistan has decided to act now. A senior Pakistani defence ministry official said Islamabad had not heard anything from the new administration of US president Donald Trump but had been feeling US pressure on the issue.

“Trump is taking hard decisions against Muslim countries, there is open talk of actions against Pakistan,” said the official. “So yes, this was a consideration.”

Other government officials have said recently that a broader diplomatic campaign pushed by India and to isolate Pakistan over its failure to pursue some Islamist groups has taken a toll, even involving pressure from longtime ally China.

The Mumbai attacks in 2008 brought Pakistan and India to the brink of war after 10 gunmen killed commuters, foreigners and some of India’s wealthy elite in a rampage that included attacks on two luxury hotels, a Jewish centre and a train station.

India accused Pakistan of sponsoring the attack through LeT, which Saeed founded in the 1990s. Pakistan has denied any state involvement and Saeed, who has distanced himself from LeT, has said repeatedly that he was not responsible.

Saeed was put under house arrest after the Mumbai attack but was released about six months later in June 2009. Awan said Islamabad had been under pressure from the US to take action against Saeed or face sanctions. “This government has buckled under the pressure,” he said.

The Punjab provincial government said Saeed and four other men were in protective custody because they violated a UN security council resolution passed after the Mumbai attacks.

Interior ministry documents seen by Reuters named Saeed and four other men as members of JuD and Falah-e-Insaniat Foundation, a charity wing of JuD headed by Saeed.

One document said the government believed the foundation was “acting in a manner that may be concerned in terrorism”.

Previous announcements of action against anti-India militant groups have rarely led to serious punishments for them. Western countries have accused Pakistan for decades of harbouring Islamist militant groups and using them as proxies against its larger neighbour India, with whom it has fought three wars since independence. Islamabad denies having such a policy.

In recent months, Saeed has been holding regular press conferences about the security crackdown in India-controlled Kashmir, trying to highlight alleged civil rights violations against the mainly Muslim population there.

He told Reuters last month that he had no fear of arrest despite the appointment of a new army chief and a new head of the Inter-Services Intelligence spy agency.

Successive Pakistani governments have vowed to crack down against militant groups. A lack of action against Saeed had been seized on by India as proof that Islamabad was dragging its feet on tackling banned outfits.

