Originally Posted by devil21 Originally Posted by

I probably should start a new thread for this post but Ill get it written down while it's fresh. Wall of text!



This court case is indicative of a much larger scale shift in global monetary policy underway. Most here know I've been following this issue pretty closely over the years, trying to work it out.



My guess at this point is that a global gold standard is being implemented and is at the end stages of completion. This global gold standard will be administered at an international central bank, per the globalist's desire for openly centralized global monetary control. The gold will be held primarily in China under the BRICS bank umbrella, which is actually another branch of the World Bank and IMF western central bank system, imo. Media coverage of much of the behind-the-scenes moves, such as this case, is being forbidden until the timing is "right" to coordinate a more mainstream release of information about the changes (or an event catalyst to use as a cover, purported to necessitate the changes). The Fed, and other fiat central banks in their current iteration, will dissolve and the "currency" returned to Treasury control. Debt forgiveness/repudiation later this year (google: Shemitah jubilee) as the Fed goes away and foreign interests that held US debt have taken control of the American collateral (land, resources, agenda 21) pledged against that debt. Those foreign debt holders won't just take it up the rear, WW3 would kick off. If they wish to avoid the utter chaos of the dollar's fiat "value" disappearing overnight, they can't shrink the amount of dollars (currency and digital) in the US. Instead, the day-to-day monetary control will be returned to the Treasury and the FRN replaced slowly by a national US Dollar. There will likely be a revaluation of the dollar downward during the transition as the FRN (global reserve) is replaced by the US note and global reserve status is lost but I don't have an opinion on how that will play out yet. Gold, in nominal dollars, would be revalued to reflect the ratio of actual amount of dollars in circulation to the amount of gold the US Dollar is backed by in the foreign central bank....or at least alleged to be, by the global bankers themselves. I don't have much of an opinion on what the revaluation will be, since no one seems to really know how much gold there actually is and the figures are all over the place. Karen Hudes says hundreds of thousands of tons while official banker released numbers are far, far lower. Which one is correct or are both of them completely wrong? Who knows? If Hudes is correct, then gold would probably revalue lower than it is today, at least in the short term while the shift settles out. If the bankers are correct and it's only enough to fill a few swimming pools, gold would skyrocket. Gold has been steady overall since the start of the year though....a settling period appears to be taking place between gold and the dollar. DX is rising yet gold stays relatively stable. No large movements up or down. Hmm. Not often do we see DX going up, oil going down sharply, and gold steady but we have lately. Probably no coincidence that the PM manipulation tactics seem to be winding down and big banks selling or closing their commodities sectors.



Gold will still be a local physical store of wealth and no bankers can change that monetary law (especially while openly holding all the gold), at least barring another 1933 EO event, but it's status as an inflation hedge/inverse relationship to the dollar will be no longer since the dollar would be declared gold backed already. There is no gold, other than that which is privately held, in the US. Most here know this. It's been sent to the global central bank. Think of the coming situation like how the Fed was "custodian" of other country's gold, but as Zippy constantly reminded us, the Fed "owned" no gold. A global central bank will be the global "custodian" for the US and other countries, which will be the claimed backing for the national currency. No, it isn't a better solution for advocates of sovereignty. It only takes the "custodian" principle to the next level of unaccountability.



Ive waded through a lot of stuff over the years, a lot of bs, a lot of misdirection, got caught up in hypes which makes one miss important items, made some bad calls, made some good ones too, etc and this is where I've ended up. Take what you like from my thoughts but I have no desire to argue with anyone about them. We wanted to get off of debt based money and I think we're getting it. Of course, there's still a lot of changes that will be made to accommodate this new system (the IRS no longer collecting income tax as a means to pay national debt interest, for example) but I think this is where it's heading.



----------------------------------------

note: Most of what I wrote is about a coordinated shift in perception. That's all that really matters in the big picture. All the gold on the planet could be whisked away by aliens but as long as the bankers say "it's there, this is how much of it there is and here's the new system" and everyone underneath them that controls perception of the masses buys into it and spreads it, does it really matter? Not really. It's the slow changing of perception that matters. If this perception shift is unsuccessful and the whole thing stalls out, you'll need your PMs, along with your guns and ammo and preps for the chaos that ensues. An interesting wrinkle to this whole scenario could be that in order to keep constitutionalists, libertarians, and the more shall-we-say "revolutionary" minded people at bay during such a large ceding of sovereignty, the TPTB (who we generally accept as being in control of presidential elections) could put Rand into the WH as sort of peace offering. May you live in interesting times....