Britboy3456, the deputy prime minister, made the decision to sack Unownuzer717 as the business, industry and trade secretary on Tuesday evening, weighing in on a situation that has resulted in the government losing a motion in the Commons and what has spiraled into an inquiry in the Lords.

In recent weeks, the business secretary and government had been under fire for controversial remarks about ‘Swedistan’ and ‘rapefugees’ which have been widely been denounced by opposition parties.

In a statement announcing the sacking, Britboy3456 accused UnownUzer717 of unacceptable behaviour, including provocative rhetoric, inappropriate language, and deliberately defying and remaining unapologetic despite having been dragged and reprimanded by the deputy prime minister.

The deputy prime minister also highlighted what he believed to be deplorable behaviour when question by the Lord’s general affairs committee inquiry, launched by Lord Friedmanite19.

“He repeatedly avoided questions, for example, attempting to claim that Swedenistan does not refer to Sweden. The NUP finds this perversion of the Lords to also be deplorable.”

Having sacked Unownuzer717, Britboy3456 announced that Dick_Knee would be his replacement. Dicky_Knee will be facing MPs today at Oral Questions to the Business, Industry and Trade Secretary.

The departure marks a victory for opposition parties and those on the government benches who have been disquiet at the remarks and tone coming from the business department, although one that is likely to be short lived.

Whilst opposition parties may try and claim the scalp for themselves, the departure will be seen in the context of several government pieces of legislation passing into law.

These include 'TULRA' repeal, Companies Act repeal, and the reintroduction of right to buy onto the statute books.

Despite this however, Britboy3456 will not be pleased by yet another BIT secretary. The government has had three business secretaries in three months, and this is the second time a BIT minister has left the department in acrimony.

When asked for comment, Duncs11 said that the it took long enough, “but credit where credit is due, the NUP leader finally stepped up and did the right thing.”

He then, however, piled on further pressure.

“It is concerning he was not removed as an MP or expelled from the NUP, and shows that his views are still welcome on the backbenches. I am furthermore concerned that the straw that broke the camel's back was his behaviour in the Lord's hearing rather than the clear and blatant racist views he expresses, so while the outcome is an improvement on the status quo, it does nothing to reassure people that the NUP is not a racist party.”