The social justice movement was destined to progress to the point where a gay black man who’s been called the N-word is forced to endure his own personal struggle session because he wasn’t adequately sensitive to some other group deemed to be even more oppressed.

We’ve arrived!

Craig Brooks, 26, posted a video Sunday on Twitter that showed him manning the front desk at a Holiday Inn Express in Austin, Texas, and denying room check-in to a woman who he said he had just previously overheard call him the N-word over the phone.

“I said I was sorry,” you can hear the woman pleading to Brooks.

He replies, “I understand that, but it’s above me now.” He tells her to try checking in at a different hotel nearby.

The video went viral online for what appears to be a class act on the part of Brooks, who is both black and gay.

But shortly after garnering the positive attention online, some people on Twitter dug up old tweets by Brooks wherein he criticized transgenderism as confusing and unnatural.

“I’m gay and all but I will NEVER understand trans people,” he said in one tweet from June 2017. “Call me ignorant but I don’t care.” He said in a another tweet that trans people shouldn’t be assumed as innate associates of gay people “because Trans people don’t identify as gay people.”

After noticing the comments about trans people, one person tweeted at Brooks, “Damn, I [really] wanted to like you.” Another person tweeted, “Holy shit! This guy REALLY REALLY despises trans people.”

Buzzfeed published a story Monday on the affair, noting that Brooks has now “changed his tune” and that he wrote a note on Facebook calling his past comments “wrongful” and “harmful.”

It’s a perfect illustration of the bottomless derangement of the social justice movement, as detailed in my forthcoming book, "Privileged Victims: How America’s Culture Fascists Hijacked the Country and Elevated Its Worst People." A black man, perhaps with slavery in his ancestry and who is also gay, gets called the N-word, acquiring him widespread attention and putting him at what would be the peak of the grievance hierarchy. But the scale of oppression is fickle. Positive attention can give way almost instantly to public shame. Brooks did what was required of him, genuflecting to another aggrieved identity.

It never ends. When you think you’ve heard it all, another layer of oppression is laid atop the other, another block of grievance is stacked on top of the next.

I hope Brooks enjoyed his brief status as a social justice hero. Now it’s on to the next.