Due to a necessary change in our traveling schedule and the recently announced live-stream AMA [with CEO Logino Dujardin] -which will be held in two weeks- we have changed the submission AMA to be presented in written form. All questions have been answered by CEO Logino Dujardin and COO Andy Demeulemeester. For those who did not have a chance or recently thought of something you would like answered, we suggest you prepare them for the next live AMA or direct yourself to the official channels.

Below is every question proposed by the community during our December questionnaire event:

Q: Will there be fiat on ramp to Inheriti? How does this affect the token supply?

A: When integrated the fiat on-ramp will utilize platform credits. These credits will be used by the front-end user. On the back-end, SHA tokens will be utilized from a Safe Haven owned utility pool.

Q: What is the marketing plan for Inheriti?

A: As it stands, Inheriti is very specific to the cryptocurrency market. Adoption must be where it can be — within the market. Multi-chain solutions are going to be key in marketing Inheriti. Essentially, once public and the platform has passed through all auditing — multiple chains will be added and marketed to those communities.

Q: Can you explain Inheriti without TAN assistance?

A: In order to use SHIP in a fully automated way, we introduced the concept of non-TAN based Merge Authorities (MA) and Dead-Man Switches (DMS). Here, the Initiator selects a stakeholder as an MA, the eldest son for instance. It’s the MA that needs to initiate the release of the shares and SHIP that needs to validate the release by using complementary smart contracts shares covering 4 different DMS scenarios.

Q: Can anyone with privates keys use Inheriti for any token?

A: Yes, the product is not limited. Inheriti is accessible for everyone who holds any digital information he/she wishes to make inheritable. This can be a private key for BTC, ETH, VET or others. At the moment, the platform is running on VeChain and more will be added over time.

Q: Is there a limit how much you can upload to the solution with a subscription?

A: There will be several subscription plans with limited protection plans on every subscription. These details are not public yet, but will be released when finalized.

Q: Can you explain Inheriti subscription options better?

A: The subscription options will be FIAT based to achieve mass adoption. Anyone who has little understanding of cryptocurrency will be able to purchase credits with FIAT. In the background, these credits will be converted to SHA to use in the platform.

Q: Can you use Inheriti without SafeKey? If not, any plans to offer this as an option (even if more expensive)?

A: This has been internally discussed for some time now. It is likely that once Inheriti functions properly with the utilization of SafeKey (decentralized), we will further experiment with Cloud and IPFS.

Q: Will there be a 3rd party audit provided for Inheriti?

A: Yes, Integrity will audit the platform. Integrity is the Europe’s number-1 in ethical hacking and has the world champion hacker within its ranks.

Q: Out of the box, does Inheriti work with any coin I own the private keys to?

A: Yes, you can input any kind of information you desire. We are not speaking only about private keys but also passwords, social media accounts, corporate papers and information, etc…

Q: Will you offer a FIAT subscription plan and a package that builds in SafeKey price to a subscription?

A: This is another aspect we have discussed internally for quite some time and it will be an option that we intend to offer. What that price will be is not announced yet.

Q: On the Inheriti website I noticed there is already mentioned a business edition. I know it’s early but are you already in talks with interested companies? Reached NDA’s?

A: Yes, we are currently speaking to US based company who has interest in reselling our plans to their B2B customers.

Q: What are realistic goals for adoption on Inheriti push with the current product release coming out? 1% overall crypto marketcap aim?

A: A target goal of 1 percent would represent roughly $1–2billion of the cryptocurrency marketcap. This would be quite impressive. Realistically, in the short-term (1–3 years), we would like to see .1 (tenth) to .25 (quarter) of a percent of the market cap, roughly, 200–500million. This is in terms of combined owner wealth, not subscription of services. That number would be harder to identify.

Q: Will we see additional wallets in the near future for MySafeWallet like BTC, XRP, etc…?

A: MySafeWallet is an interface from third parties. We are not actively working on MSW.

Q: What is the plan to expand TAN sign ups?

A: We are still exploring more partnerships to expand the TAN. In the beginning, we count on our community to promote TAN to your personal lawyer, notary or financial expert. If you are experienced in the field, do not hesitate to subscribe. TAN is like the LinkedIn for legal entities in the blockchain space, and this brings a massive cost in marketing budget.

Q: How close is ThorPay to release?

A: We expect ThorPay to be available within Q2 2020. Originally, we expected it within the first half of Q1, now we are looking at Q2. We had to shift resources over to ensure the Boost Program worked efficiently.

Q: When do you expect ledger support for NODE?

A: Adding Ledger support is difficult, also its not a priority for the team. We are in contact with Ledger but would like to use that contact on other opportunities.

Q: Will there become a marketplace to trade nodes?

A: Our smart contracts are designed to trade nodes so the possibility is there. The nodes are unlimited so we don’t know if it will be beneficial over time. The only use case we see here is an opportunity to waive maturity for people desiring to avoid that phase.

Q: What is next for ThorBlock V3?

A: ThorBlock V3 will bring a FIAT gateway, more supported chains like ETH, Harmony and Binance. Also, after the community feedback, we are working on a better user experience and onboarding procedure. Ideally, we see ThorBlock as a community project, so we would like to call out to the SHA community; if you have any technical skills that could benefit TB V3, feel free to reach out.

Q: Since a part of the team is Belgium based, how well are your connections to its financial and legal industry?

A: Brussels is the capital of Europe. The team has connections with several financial and legal institutions. We prefer to release the products first, so we won’t burn any bridges.

Q: Are there more partnerships in the pipeline? And are there more companies that are going to use SHA solutions?

A: Yes, we are talking to several potential partners. Business expansion is our main goal for 2020

Q: Are talks with KPMG ongoing?

A: Not at the moment. KPMG Cyprus was not the best fit for SHA on the incorporation part and it was decided to put that on hold for now.

Q: What other multi-chain partners are you talking to?

A: We have been talking to BNB, DGB, TRX and some others. More details will be announced once something final comes out of the discussions.

Q: Any updates on the Safe Haven ledger with NitroKey?

A: No priority for 2020. SHA Ledger will be a big cut in the budget. We are thinking to run a crowdfunding campaign in the future for this product.

Q: How do you plan on fixing current liquidity issues with the token? Market maker a possibility? New exchanges without demanding integration?

A: Liquidity providers are a solution, however, is extremely expensive. There are a few decentralized solutions out there, but none that current operate with VIP protocol. They also have to have a back-end functionality with each specific exchange. Exchanges themselves have little to do with liquidity, as they do not provide services such as these.

Q: What are the priorities for 2020?

A: Expansion. This includes both internal expansion (staffing) and external use of products and revenue generating streams.

Q: Are current partnerships building on any SHA solutions?

A: Currently we have Global Funeral Care and PlanChain who are building on the SHA infrastructure. Both are close to release either their alpha or BETA product. This space is beginning to mature, and with this maturity comes the realization that the space moves much slower than people realize. Projects are running into roadblocks that take time to analyze and surpass. We are hopeful that the projects we are currently in discussion with will find means and advantages to build using SHA infrastructure. With that being said, there is a solid focus outside of the blockchain space, as well.

Q: Are you releasing a place to see pool distribution as utility ramps for node holders?

A: A dashboard will eventually be created to view pool stats when we have some down time. This is not a priority for us at the moment, though.

Q: Sunny never talks about SHA anymore, why?

A: We can only state that each project is focussed on building and bringing TX to the VeChain Network. Sunny is doing the same. We have our project and they have theirs, so everyone is very busy.

Q: Any plan to update the website or white paper?

A: We are building a new website for Safe Haven and SafeKey, as we speak. In my opinion, a whitepaper is 2017. I would rather let the products speak for themselves and let our community guide new people in the right direction. Of course, we have business papers and decks we use to pitch our products to several potential clients and partners.

Q: Can you clarify the multi-chain solution? ICOs? Converting SHA on one chain into the other chain?

A: Multi-chain means that we will support several chains in our solutions, eg: Harmony. We will swap some SHA-VIP180 to SHA built on the Harmony protocol, so everytime a new chain is added in the platforms, their community can use their respective native SHA token. This will all be conducted using bridges.

Q: Will the financial report eventually be released?

A: Of course, for now the team is focussed on releasing the BETA products and business expansion. Once we find a more quiet period and we can spend more time on finalizing the report, we will. As we have stated in the past, a financial report without realized revenue looks bleak and to those who don’t know or are familiar with financial statements, this could create unnecessary concern. We would prefer for realized revenue to be incorporated to allow for a more balanced and true report. This will allow the community to become more aware of both the overhead and income, thus giving a true margin.

We are hopeful that with the release of several Safe Haven elements, 2020 will be a solid year. A contributing factor to the success of the year will also be the attitude carried by the Safe Haven community and our partners. We advise those who feel compelled to do deep diving, focus on the tech and use-case of each Safe Haven/SafeTech element, and steer clear of speculative and token nuances of the space. For those who submitted questions, thank you. Hopefully we have answered them to your expectations.