edit on 7/8/2014 by Kangaruex4Ewe because: (no reason given)



As far as theories go, this one makes a lot of sense. I have often thought that the government constantly makes it easier for folks to get help. My theory is that one generally does not bite the hand that feeds them. The more people the government can get dependent on them for life's basic necessities.... the more they have control over those people.For example - A lot of women stay in abusive situations and die because of it simply because they have nowhere to go, nobody to help them, no money, and most of the time no way to get money. She feels she must stay in the situation for her survival. She can't fathom making it own her own, so the abuser has her right where he wants her and knows that she can not and will not flee because survival (no matter how short) is better than almost any other alternative.It's the same In this situation IMO. the government is "rescuing" these children. The government will be providing every single thing they need for the foreseeable future... What better way to all but guarantee that every single one of these children with become and remain loyal to the government for all of their benevolent and magnanimous generosity.It's a mess for sure. I am not sure why people can't see it for what it is.