I’ve been trying to work on my rhetoric as I’ve never been very good at it, and have troubles with those with higher improvisational, verbalization abilities. So, as a learning exercise for myself and others, I’m going to go over a Twitter conversation I had a couple weeks ago that will illustrate some common occurrences when debating leftist weasels.

To begin with, here’s the background. CRX48 posted this and the homosexual brigade dogpiled him over the course of multiple tweet ‘conversations’.

I'll never understand that "pride parade" mentality where rather than keeping private things private they demand we watch. It's sick. — CRX48 (@CRX48) August 19, 2014

Here was one of their responses which played a part later:

.@NRX48 I'll never understand why homophobes think we should keep our existence a secret for their comfort. — not homophobic but (@homophobiaphobe) August 22, 2014

If you look at this @homophobiaphobes account, it’s dedicated almost entirely to tracking down ‘homophobes’ (a word which, as we’ll see later, has absolutely no definition beyond a person this homosexual dislikes) and starting 2-minute hates on their Twitter feeds.

https://twitter.com/homophobiaphobe

That’s the background. At one point CRX posted this:

@homophobiaphobe I speak Latin so it literally means fear of humans to me. Anyway, parading sex in public is perversion. That's all I said. — CRX48 (@CRX48) August 22, 2014

To which the homosexual replied:

.@NRX48 Whether you speak Latin or not, the word obviously does not mean fear of humans in popular English. — not homophobic but (@homophobiaphobe) August 22, 2014

I replied with this and the game was on:

@homophobiaphobe @NRX48 Because progressives are ignorant everybody else needs to be as well? — Free Northerner (@FreeNortherner) August 22, 2014

@homophobiaphobe @NRX48 When the word is the meaningless semantic equivalent of ‘badthink’ or monkeys hooting at each other. Yes. — Free Northerner (@FreeNortherner) August 22, 2014

Remember, homophobe, racist, sexist, bigot, shitlord, etc. have no real semantic meaning, they are not words that reflect a reality reality in any way. They exist solely as ad hominem attacks on people progressives don’t like.

@homophobiaphobe @NRX48 When the word was created solely for the purpose of ideological ad homs yes. — Free Northerner (@FreeNortherner) August 22, 2014

When a leftist uses a word, especially an emotionally loaded word like homophobe, sexist, racist, etc., always get them to define it. Leftists do not beleive in truth; they ideologically hate truth. They don’t beleive words are used to refer to real concepts for teh purposes of communication, but rather they exist as tools of power. If you do not get them to define a word, they will change the meaning of the word to whatever is most convenient to their emotional state at the time.

@FreeNortherner @NRX48 Most people use it to mean something to the effect of “seeing or treating members of the LGBTQIAP+ community as less — not homophobic but (@homophobiaphobe) August 22, 2014

@FreeNortherner @NRX48 than a cishet for being a member of the LGBTQIAP+ community.” — not homophobic but (@homophobiaphobe) August 22, 2014

I ask for a definition, and notice the wording: “Most people use it to mean…”. This is specifically stated so that the leftist can continue to use the word however she wants. A leftist will deliberately try to avoid attaching a real definition to one of their emotionally charged words, because then it will lose its power if they do. Press them; force them to define words. You’ll see why was we go.

This is just the first weasel attempt, plenty more to follow.

@FreeNortherner @NRX48 If you’re looking for a dictionary, Twitter is not the best place to search. — not homophobic but (@homophobiaphobe) August 22, 2014

@homophobiaphobe @NRX48 You are the one arguing it is a definable word with a real meaning. Put up or shut up. — Free Northerner (@FreeNortherner) August 22, 2014

Again, the leftist weasel will dodge to avoid having to actually having to do a real debate. Remember, she said I don’t udnerstand what it means then refused to provide what it means. We can watch the lying weasel dance for quite a while:

@homophobiaphobe @NRX48 As I thought. Unable to back your assertions up. Put up or shut up and show yourself to be wrong. — Free Northerner (@FreeNortherner) August 22, 2014

@homophobiaphobe @NRX48 As I thought. Unable to back your assertions up. Put up or shut up and show yourself to be wrong. — Free Northerner (@FreeNortherner) August 22, 2014

@homophobiaphobe @NRX48 Then why did you make the assertion in the first place? — Free Northerner (@FreeNortherner) August 22, 2014

@FreeNortherner @NRX48 Again: feel free to Google for a dictionary. — not homophobic but (@homophobiaphobe) August 22, 2014

@homophobiaphobe @NRX48 Don’t be ignorant. The assertion that is is a real word with real semantic meaning beyond howler monkeys. Define. — Free Northerner (@FreeNortherner) August 22, 2014

@FreeNortherner @NRX48 It’s not my work, and I’ve already told you I’m not doing it. — not homophobic but (@homophobiaphobe) August 23, 2014

@homophobiaphobe Didn’t think you would you howling monkey. Stop throwing tires like a cowardly animal I’d you ain’t going to back it up. — Free Northerner (@FreeNortherner) August 23, 2014

Lying leftist weasels will absolutely refuse to define their terms when it comes to their favoured shit-flinging phrases. Press, press, press. Never, ever let them use emotionally-loaded words on their terms. They will abuse them like the dishonest liars they are.

Now, there was a second thread occurring at the same time.

@FreeNortherner @NRX48 No, I don’t believe so. — not homophobic but (@homophobiaphobe) August 22, 2014

Again, the leftist will straight out lie. The whole thing started with the original tweet against public sexual displays, but admitting that would show how much BS her original accusation was. So she will deny.

@FreeNortherner @NRX48 What public sexual displays are you referring to? — not homophobic but (@homophobiaphobe) August 22, 2014

@FreeNortherner As I’ve told @NRX48: there’s no reason to equate Pride with public sexual acts. — not homophobic but (@homophobiaphobe) August 22, 2014

Warning, the links in these next two tweets range from mildly NSFW to extremely NSFW.

This is in response to the first set of links, linking to some homosexual/fetish street parties in SF. Here we see the leftist through equivocation; she’s very subtlety trying to change the terms of the debate.

Remember, the original tweet referred to “that “pride parade” mentality where rather than keeping private things private they demand we watch. It’s sick.” Obviously a gay fetish parade would count, but because the parade wasn’t specifically labelled ‘pride’ the lying weasel tries to shift the terms to a false rigorous exactitude that never existed. Also note

Always be aware of weaselly attempts to shift terms or to bring into play exactitudes that don’t exist. Failing to notice can lead to a rhetorical trap.

I call her on her dishonesty:

@homophobiaphobe Who said it was? It’s the same mentality and sexual exhibitionism we’re talking about. — Free Northerner (@FreeNortherner) August 23, 2014

@homophobiaphobe We’re talking public sexual displays and the ‘pride parade mentality.’ Stop dishonestly shifting the terms. — Free Northerner (@FreeNortherner) August 23, 2014

Her dishonesty readily apparent, she switches tactics:

@FreeNortherner Considering you’ve never been to a Pride parade, you clearly aren’t qualified to have this conversation, then. — not homophobic but (@homophobiaphobe) August 23, 2014

When a leftist is losing she will retreat to disqualifying you for whatever reason. The reason for disqualifying you doesn’t matter, its almost always a dishonest tactics rather than an actual true belief. Never let a leftist disqualify you. If their disqualification was a true reason for ignoring your argument they would have ignored you from the beginning. A disqualification partly through a conversation is always a tactic taken because they are losing.

Also, because the disqualificaiton is always an excuse, never defend against it. It is a sign blood has been drawn, press the attack:

@homophobiaphobe Yrs I should believe a dishonest weasel like you over easily available photographic evidence. Great idea. — Free Northerner (@FreeNortherner) August 23, 2014

@FreeNortherner I looked through all of those images and didn’t see any sexual acts. — not homophobic but (@homophobiaphobe) August 23, 2014

This is to the second tweet of links, which were to homosexual-friendly mainstream news and therefore didn’t show anything R-Rated. These pictures do include fetish gear, public floggings, men wearing only sexualized jockstraps, sexualized dancing/grinding, almost full nudity (for example, one man had no more than a cap on his penis head), shirtless women, etc. But because they do not include anyone actively sticking their dick in someone else’s orificies she counts this as ‘no sexual acts’.

Anyone not completely sexually jaded would realize these are sexual acts, but again, lying weasels will be selectively (and falsely) precise when it suits their ideological needs of the moment.

Also note the subtle shift of terms. I said sexual displays earlier, which she changed to sexual acts. The latter being somewhat defensible through selective pedantry, the former not. Lying weasels will shift terms to cosntruct rhetorical traps, do not let them.

Whenever lying weasels do this, call them on it.

@homophobiaphobe Also, I said sexual displays not acts. Stop being a lying weasel. — Free Northerner (@FreeNortherner) August 23, 2014

They’ll try to keep going with their dishonesty, keep calling them on it:

@homophobiaphobe Stop being a dishonest weasel. I said sexual displays. — Free Northerner (@FreeNortherner) August 23, 2014

@homophobiaphobe I’m defending no one. Also, he said ‘pride parade mentality of making private things public.’ Stop equivocating. — Free Northerner (@FreeNortherner) August 23, 2014

@homophobiaphobe It doesn’t include sexualized flogging and jockstraps? — Free Northerner (@FreeNortherner) August 23, 2014

Again, the lying progressive weasel will try to define terms to whatever is emotionally or ideologically convenient at the moment.

@homophobiaphobe What kind of underwear ads do you watch? — Free Northerner (@FreeNortherner) August 23, 2014

From here it kind of petered out. I thought I had another closing tweet but can’t seem to find it in Twitter’s interface.

Anyone, the points to take from this: progressives are naturally dishonest and will use words as weapons rather than as reflections of reality used to communicate information. Make them define terms and don’t let them get away with dishonest equivocating or the shifting of terms.