Abstract Insect immune systems can recognize specific pathogens and prime offspring immunity. High specificity of immune priming can be achieved when insect females transfer immune elicitors into developing oocytes. The molecular mechanism behind this transfer has been a mystery. Here, we establish that the egg-yolk protein vitellogenin is the carrier of immune elicitors. Using the honey bee, Apis mellifera, model system, we demonstrate with microscopy and western blotting that vitellogenin binds to bacteria, both Paenibacillus larvae – the gram-positive bacterium causing American foulbrood disease – and to Escherichia coli that represents gram-negative bacteria. Next, we verify that vitellogenin binds to pathogen-associated molecular patterns; lipopolysaccharide, peptidoglycan and zymosan, using surface plasmon resonance. We document that vitellogenin is required for transport of cell-wall pieces of E. coli into eggs by imaging tissue sections. These experiments identify vitellogenin, which is distributed widely in oviparous species, as the carrier of immune-priming signals. This work reveals a molecular explanation for trans-generational immunity in insects and a previously undescribed role for vitellogenin.

Author Summary Insects lack antibodies, the carriers of immunological memory that vertebrate mothers can transfer to their offspring. Yet, it has been shown that an insect mother facing pathogens can prime her offspring’s immune system. To date, it has remained enigmatic how insects achieve specific trans-generational immune priming despite the absence of antibody-based immunity. Here, we show this is made possible via an egg-yolk protein binding to immune elicitors that are then carried to eggs. This yolk protein, called vitellogenin, is able to bind to different bacteria and pathogenic pattern molecules. We use E. coli fragments as a bait to show how vitellogenin is necessary for the carrying of immune elicitors to eggs. These findings help to understand how insects fight pathogens and can be useful for protection of ecologically and economically important insects, such as the honey bee, that we used as a model species.

Citation: Salmela H, Amdam GV, Freitak D (2015) Transfer of Immunity from Mother to Offspring Is Mediated via Egg-Yolk Protein Vitellogenin. PLoS Pathog 11(7): e1005015. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005015 Editor: David S. Schneider, Stanford University, UNITED STATES Received: January 30, 2015; Accepted: June 9, 2015; Published: July 31, 2015 Copyright: © 2015 Salmela et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files. Funding: HS was funded by Academy of Finland grant number 265971. www.aka.fi/en-GB/A/ GVA was funded by Norwegian Research Council grant number 180504 and 191699. www.forskningsradet.no/en/Home_page/1177315753906 DF was funded by Academy of Finland grant number 251337 and 252411. HS and DF were also supported by University of Helsinki www.helsinki.fi/university. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction Insects lack antibodies, the carriers of immunological memory in vertebrates. Therefore, it has been thought that insects are deprived of acquired immunity and only have innate defense mechanisms against pathogens. Recent research, however, has shown that insects are capable of high specificity in their defense reactions; indeed, insect immune defenses can recognize specific pathogens [1] and prime offspring against them [2,3]. Immunity is a major mechanism of survival that carries significant physiological and energetic costs, thus, immune responses must be regulated to maximise fitness [4,5]. Immunocompetence is traded-off against other life-history traits, such as growth and development, when the risk of infection is low. In order to maximize the fitness of their offspring in terms of immunity, growth rate and reproductive potential, selection should favour passing on a plastic signal (i.e. presence or absence of pathogens) about the pathogenicity of the environment. It has been observed that many organisms can transfer highly specific immune protection to the next generation [6]. Trans-generational immune priming (TGIP) was initially attributed to animals with antibody-based adaptive immune systems [6]. The discovery that invertebrates, equipped only with innate immune responses, are also able to prime their offspring against infections has changed the understanding of innate immunity. Interestingly, even nonpathogenic bacteria in diet can trigger systemic immune responses in both the same generation and in the next [7,8]. Cumulative evidence shows how maternal exposure to immune elicitors, and dead or living bacterial cells, leads to higher immunocompetence in the offspring [8–12]. For example, Moret et al. (2006) found increased immunity in the next generation after injecting adult mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) females with bacterial lipopolysaccharides (LPS) [9]. Also, in the red flour beetle (Tribolium castaneum), Roth et al. (2009) showed that parental exposure to the Gram-positive soil-dwelling bacterium, Bacillus thurngiensis, could elicit strain-specific TGIP [10], while Freitak et al. (2009) found that feeding non-pathogenic bacteria to female cabbage loopers (Trichoplusia ni) during larval stage resulted in higher steady state immunity in the next generation [8]. In the tobacco hornworm (Manduca sexta), Adbel-latief & Hilker (2008) demonstrated that the embryonic immune system is up-regulated after injection of immune elicitors into eggs [13]. Finally, Hernandez-Lopez et al. (2014) showed that injecting honey bee (Apis mellifera) queens with dead Paenibacillus larvae (bacterium responsible for the American foulbrood disease) leads to higher resistance against this pathogen in the offspring [14]. These findings have created a central dilemma in immunological physiology regarding how immune priming can be mediated by mechanisms other than antibodies. Innate and adaptive immune responses are triggered by pathogen-associated molecular patterns, or immune elicitors. Immune elicitors are present on the cell walls of bacteria and fungi [1]. TGIP appears to be mediated by fragments of such pathogenic microorganisms, which can be transferred from insect midgut lumen to the hemocoel [2]. In the hemocoel, fragments are transferred and incorporated into fat body, a tissue that is functionally homologous to liver and white adipose tissue in vertebrates. Eventually, fragments are detected in developing eggs [2]. These findings suggest that microbial fragments are transferred from mother to offspring, carrying specific immune elicitors to mediate appropriate immune responses. However, it has remained unknown exactly how the immune elicitors can enter insect eggs. The ability to utilize TGIP mechanisms can be of considerable economic importance. Industries that rely on beneficial invertebrates can develop methods of prevention against contagious diseases, whereas industries dealing with pest control can instead induce reduced TGIP. One invertebrate that can benefit from a commercial utilization of TGIP is the honey bee, Apis mellifera. The honey bee is an ecologically and economically important pollinator of many wild plants as well as cash crops. At the same time, it is susceptible to many diseases, and thus like many other important pollinators, is in global population decline. Since TGIP was recently confirmed in the honey bee system, i.e. in response to the pathogen responsible for American foulbrood disease, we here combined biochemistry and histology to trace the fate of the immune elicitors during insect egg development under threat of pathogens. We hypothesized that TGIP is mediated by a protein that plays roles both in egg-yolk formation and immunity–vitellogenin (Vg). Vg is a yolk precursor as well as a pathogen pattern recognition receptor [15]. It is a nutritious lipoprotein synthesized by the fat body or vertebrate liver, secreted to the hemolymph/blood and taken up by nurse cells and eggs by receptor-mediated endocytosis [7]. Vg concentration varies between the members of the honey bee colony, from almost undetectable to 40% of the total hemolymph protein fraction in the functionally sterile helper females, called workers—and it constitutes up to 70% of the hemolymph protein fraction in the egg-laying queens [16]. In fish, Vg binds to LPS of Gram-negative bacteria, to peptidoglycan (PG, a major constituent of the cell-wall of Gram-positive bacteria), and to surface glucan of fungi [17]. These immunological properties of Vg are little explored in species other than fish. Here, we reveal how honey bee Vg has similar immunological binding properties, and, for the first time, demonstrate how the bound immune elicitors can enter eggs via Vg uptake to the ovary. These results suggest a central role for Vg in TGIP.

Discussion We establish here a previously undescribed role for the major egg-yolk precursor protein Vg as the carrier of immune elicitors from mother to eggs in insects. Using the honey bee as a model, we first confirm that Vg binds to different types of bacteria, both P. larvae, a Gram-positive pathogen that infects and kills honey bee larvae, and to E. coli that represents Gram-negative bacteria. This binding could not be mimicked by BSA. Next, we verify that Vg binds to pathogen-associated molecular patterns. Finally, we document that Vg is required for the transport of fluorescently labeled cell wall pieces of E. coli into developing eggs in ovaries. These experiments show for the first time that Vg serves as a carrier of immune-priming signals. This finding provides a new molecular mechanism behind trans-generational immunity in oviparous species. Although not conclusive, our bacteria western blot with stronger Vg binding to P. larvae than E. coli and surface plasmon resonance data with stronger PG binding response compared to LPS hint that Vg might have a binding preference to Gram-positive bacteria. This could be an adaptation to the major bacterial threats of the honey bee larvae: P. larvae, as well as Melissococcus plutonius which causes European foulbrood disease. These pathogens are both Gram-positive bacteria. Several human lipoproteins bind to a broad range of hydrophobic inflammatory molecules including bacterial surface structures and remnants of necrotic cells in an anti-inflammatory manner [18,19]. Based on our current and previous data, we propose that the insect lipoprotein Vg shares a similarly broad binding range. We previously found that honey bee Vg binds strongly to phosphatidylserine containing liposomes, to blebs of apoptotic insect cells and to necrotic cells packed with phosphatidylserine, while having modest binding capability to healthy insect cell membrane or liposomes with neutral phosphatidylcholine [20]. The negative charge of phosphatidylserine may explain the selectivity of Vg binding between lipids, as Vg α-helical part seems to have higher affinity towards negatively charged damaged cell membranes [20]. We speculate that the combination of negative charge and hydrophobicity can provoke Vg binding to the bacterial PG and LPS signature molecules as well. Vg participation in TGIP can represent a co-option of the protein’s dual role in fecundity and immunity [21]. The gene (vitellogenin) experiences rapid evolution in the honey bee [22], it is present in different copy numbers in different insect species [23], and has several homologous genes in some insects [24]. Mutation hotspots are found within the honey bee vitellogenin sequence, and the multiple alleles are under ongoing positive selection in Africa, East- and West-Europe. By analogy to vertebrate adaptive immunity [15,25,26], certain Vg variants could be more sensitive to specific pathogen recognition. Vitellogenin alleles in at least some insects may thus evolve under local pathogen pressure. We speculate that changes in pathogen pressure over time and in different environments are reflected in these interesting patterns of vitellogenin evolution. Examining the roles of Vg in invertebrate TGIP can open up entirely new areas in immunology. Immune responses can be very specific and induced by pathogen associated molecular markers present on the cell walls of microorganisms (PG, LPS, surface glucans). TGIP can occur and disappear very rapidly, is often maternally transmitted and shows pathogen specificity. The new discovery of a Vg-mediated transfer-mechanism, as described here, would be consistent with all these observations. For Vg-mediated TGIP to occur, the mother must be exposed to a certain amount of pathogenic cell wall fragments during or immediately prior to reproduction. Bacteria are actively lysed in the gut lumen by the digestive system, as well as in the hemolymph by the immune system. Once in the hemolymph, the immune elicitors are available for binding to Vg and for transfer to the developing eggs in the ovary. This route would allow a mother to prime her offspring against the specific infections present in her current environment. When the environment becomes pathogen-free and infection has cleared from the adult female, no transfer to her eggs would take place. In this manner, the cost of resistance to infections in offspring would be avoided. We propose that Vg-mediated TGIP can allow for efficient, specific and environmental-dependent immune priming in insects. However, this mechanism does not rule out that other mechanisms also participate in TGIP. These can include paternal TGIP, other molecules transported by mothers or epigenetic modifications [27,28]. In this context, it is interesting to note that male insects also produce Vg, and that Vg can be found in their seminal fluids [29]. Vg-mediated transfer of pathogenically inactive bacterial fragments could provide a platform for the development of vaccines for beneficial insects. For example, pollinator-oriented medical genetics could aim to identify the most TGIP efficient vitellogenin alleles to improve honey bee colony survival. The reproductive female, the queen honey bee, is typically shielded from harsh environmental conditions and infection. However, her environment is never sterile. Exposure can occur by direct contact or by contaminated food, and honey bee queens are likely to experience some levels of pathogen load [30–32]. Conversely, knowledge about Vg-mediated TGIP can also open the door for modifying or hijacking TGIP in pest insect species. For example, TGIP may be impaired by chemically modifying the binding properties of Vg. Alternatively, TGIP could be exploited to trigger a reaction against the pathogenic insect’s symbionts, or to put the immune system in overdrive—increasing the cost of immunity and reducing investment in reproduction. In sum, such applications could be highly beneficial in agriculture. It remains to be tested whether Vg-mediated transfer of immune elicitors occurs in egg-laying vertebrates. If yes, then the vertebrate lineage would have retained an ancient TGIP mechanism in addition to their evolutionary innovation of transfer of antibodies.

Materials and Methods 1. Western blot with live P. larvae and E. coli Wintertime worker honey bee hemolymph (hl) and fat body protein extract (fb) are rich in Vg, and were used for testing Vg-binding to bacteria, adapted from the fish Vg experiment by Tong et al. [17] using an antibody that detects honey bee Vg. For cell-free hl and fb sampling, see Havukainen et al. [33]. The experiment was performed at room temperature, centrifugation steps were 3,000 g for 5 min, and wash volume was 0.5 ml of PBS, if not mentioned otherwise. P. larvae (strain 9820 purchased from Belgian Co-ordinated Collections of Micro-organisms, Gent, Belgium) grown on MYPGP agar plates for 7 days and Epicurian Gold E. coli grown in LB medium liquid culture overnight were washed and suspended in 100 μl PBS per sample. The bacteria suspensions (~1.3 x 108 cells/ml) were mixed with either an equal volume of hemolymph diluted 1/10 in PBS with a protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Penzberg, Germany) or with fat body protein extract (5.7 mg/ml total protein in PBS with the protease inhibitors). The following negative controls were used: 1) 100 μl P.larvae and E. coli with an equal volume of PBS but no hl/fb, to detect possible unspecific antibody binding to the bacteria, 2) 100 μl fb with an equal volume of PBS, but no bacteria, to detect possible Vg aggregation, and 3) 100 μl P.larvae and E. coli treated with 100 μl 5 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (BSA; control protein). As untreated controls, we kept on ice 0.1 μl of hl, 0.5 μl of fb extract, and 1 μl of BSA. The samples were incubated at 26°C for 50 min under agitation for Vg-bacteria binding to occur. The bacteria were washed six times. The final pellet was resuspended in 10 μl of 4 M urea in PBS, agitated for 15 min and centrifuged. The samples were blotted on a nitrocellulose membrane according to a standard horse-radish peroxidase conjugate protocol with the Vg antibody tested before [33,34] (dilution 1:25,000; Pacific Immunology, Ramona, CA, USA), or a commercial BSA antibody (1:2000; Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The bands were visualized using Immune-Star kit and ChemiDoc XRS+ imager. All blotting reagents were purchased from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA, USA). 2. Microscopy of P. larvae and E. coli Vg-binding to bacteria was further tested by fluorescence microscopy. The incubation with hl was as above, except hl and bacteria volumes were both 20 μl and the number of bacterial cells was ~3 x 106. All centrifugation steps were 10,000 g, +4°C, 5 min and PBS-T wash volumes were 1 ml. After hl incubation with the bacteria, the bacteria were washed and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min in room temperature. The cells were washed twice and blocked with 5% milk in PBS-T for 30 min in room temperature and washed again. Vg primary antibody (same as above) was used 1:50 in PBS-T and 1% milk for overnight incubation at +4°C. The samples were washed twice and incubated with Alexa fluor 488 nm anti-rabbit antibody, 1:50, for 1 h in room temperature in dark and washed three times. DNA was stained with standard propidium iodide (PI) protocol (Invitrogen). The bacteria were mounted with glycerol and imaged with Zeiss Axio Imager M2, excitations 499 nm and 536 nm, and emissions 519 nm and 617 nm. The primary antibody was omitted in the treatment of the secondary antibody control samples. 3. Surface plasmon resonance with LPS, PG and zymosan Vg was purified from honey bee hemolymph with ion-exchange chromatography as described before [20,34]. Biacore T200 instrument (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, USA) and buffers from the manufacturer were used. The analytes were bought from Sigma Aldrich: PG from S. aureus #77140, LPS from E. coli #L2630 and zymosan from S. cerevisiae #Z4250. 30 μl/ml Vg in 10 mM acetate buffer pH 4.5 was immobilized on a CM5 chip—primed and conditioned according to the manufacturer’s instructions—until the response reached 5150 RU. The chip was blocked using ethanolamine. The analytes were suspended in the running buffer (0.1 M HEPES, 1.5 M NaCl and 0.5% v/v surfactant P20) and heated at 90°C for 30 min with repeated vigorous vortexing, followed by spinning in a table centrifuge for 20 min. Zymosan was heated for an additional 30 min at 95°C before centrifugation. PG and zymosan form a fine suspension in water solutions, and they formed a pellet during the centrifugation; their concentrations are given here as the weight added to the volume. The analytes were run with 120 s contact time and 600 s dissociation time with a 30 μl/min flow rate at 25°C. The analytes flowing in a separate channel on a naked chip was used as a blank, whose value was subtracted from the sample. After optimizing the binding-range, the following concentrations were measured. PG: 0, 0.25, 0.5, 2, 3, 5 mg/ml; LPS: 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.9, 1.8, 3 mg/ml, and zymosan: 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 mg/ml. PG and LPS binding did not reach binding saturation, yet, we did not exceed 5 mg/ml or 3 mg/ml concentration, respectively, to avoid analyte aggregation (see the manufacturer’s information and references therein for work concentrations). 4. Microscopy of queen ovaries Six one year old A. mellifera ligustica queens were anesthetized on ice. Their ovaries were dissected and washed in ice cold PBS. One of the paired ovaries per queen was then placed in control solution (50 μl PBS containing 2 mg/ml Texas Red labeled E. coli Bioparticles; Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and the other ovary was placed in the same solution that contained, in addition, 0.5 mg/ml Vg purified from honey bee hemolymph [20,33]. The ovaries were incubated at 28ºC for 2 h under agitation. Next, the ovaries were washed twice in 1 ml ice cold PBS for 5 min under agitation. Samples of two queens were directly mounted using Fluoromount (Sigma) and observed by bright field and fluorescence (excitation 595 nm, emission 615 nm) microscopy (Axio Imager M2, Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany). One additional untreated control queen was imaged for detection of the autofluorescent pedical area of the ovary. The remaining four queens were embedded in Tissue-Tek (Sakura Finetek, Torrance, CA, USA) and stored in -80ºC. These ovaries were cut in 17 mm sections at -20ºC, and imaged immediately after mounting. The microscopy settings were kept constant during imaging. To test whether hemolymph proteins could trigger the uptake of immune elicitors even in the absence of Vg, we modified the experimental setup to include hemolymph proteins other than Vg, the majority of which are apolipophorin and hexamerins, both known to bind to immune elicitors [35]. The other hemolymph proteins were obtained by running ion-exchange chromatography on honey bee hemolymph and dividing the collected hemolymph fractions into Vg and non-Vg proteins (S1 Fig) [20,33]. Remaining small molecular weight hemolymph molecules, such as possible peptides and hormones, were removed during protein concentration using centrifugal filters with 50 kDa cutoff with both Vg and non-Vg fractions (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Fractions containing both Vg and other hemolymph proteins were discarded. The Vg and the non-Vg proteins had a final concentration of 0.5 mg/ml in the experiment. The queens were as above. The setup was as follows (all incubations contained the E. coli Bioparticles 1.5 mg/ml): one ovary was incubated with Vg and the other ovary with control solution (see above) (N = 3); one with Vg and the other with non-Vg hemolymph proteins (N = 3), and one ovary with non-Vg hemolymph proteins and the other with control solution (N = 2). The cryo-section imaging was done as above.

Supporting Information S1 Fig. Chromatographic fractioning of honey bee hemolymph to Vg and other proteins. S = size standard. (A) An SDS-PAGE gel with a honey bee hemolymph sample used for protein fractioning. The major proteins are (in size order) apolipophorin, vitellogenin and hexamerins. (B) Pure vitellogenin and other hemolymph proteins produced by ion-exchange chromatography. The faint ~150 and ~40 kDa bands in the pure vitellogenin fraction are the previously mass-spectrometrically verified vitellogenin fragmentation products [33]. (C) Hemolymph fractioning chromatogram. The X-axis shows the time with 0.5 ml/min flow rate, and the Y-axis shows the percentage of 0.45 M NaCl phosphate buffer. The fraction collected as pure Vg is highlighted grey. The other protein fraction collected is indicated below the X-axis. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005015.s001 (JPG)

Acknowledgments We thank Prof. Liselotte Sundström at the Centre of Excellence in Biological Interactions, University of Helsinki, Finland, for kind support laboratory and writing wise. We thank MSc Eugen Pohoata for his great help with optimizing the E. coli imaging conditions, and D. Page Baluch for expert imaging support (Arizona State University, USA), and Prof. Oyvind Halskau and Ole Horvli for support with the Biacore instrument (University of Bergen, Norway). We thank Claus Kreibich and the Finnish Beekeepers’ Association and, in particular, Ari Seppälä for help with the queen samples. Thanks to beekeeper Eero Hänninen for providing honey bee test samples. For fruitful discussions, we want to thank Prof. Ingemar Fries and his group at Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden, and Prof. Robin Moritz and Dr. Silvio Erler at Martin Luther University, Germany, as well as Dr. Daniel Münch at Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Norway.

Author Contributions Conceived and designed the experiments: HS GVA DF. Performed the experiments: HS DF. Analyzed the data: HS DF. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: HS GVA DF. Wrote the paper: HS GVA DF.