Preliminary Materials for a Critique of the Nice Guy Yale Girl Nice Woman Nihilist Feminist

- By Yale Girl and a Nice Guy (who probably doesn’t deserve any credit)

Translation provided by: Nice Guy’s Long Slow Death. Somewhere a woman increased her salary, so it’s all good.

‘In tha era of its real domination, capital has run away (as tha cyberneticians put it), it has escaped. [7] It be no longer controlled by human beings. (Human beings up in the form of proletarians might, at least passively, represent a funky-ass barrier to capital.) It be no longer limited by nature. Right back up in yo muthafuckin ass. Some thang processes carried up over periodz of time lead ta clashes wit natural barriers: increase up in tha number of human beings, destruction of nature, pollution. I aint talkin’ bout chicken n’ gravy biatch. But these barriers cannot be theoretically regarded as barriers which capital cannot supersede fo’ realz. At present there be three possible courses fo’ tha capitalist mode of thang (in addizzle ta tha destruction of humanitizzle - a hypothesis dat cannot be ignored):

complete autonomizzle of capital: a mechanistic utopia where human beings become simple accessoriez of a automated system, though still retainin a executizzle role;

mutation of tha human being, or rather a chizzle of tha species: thang of a perfectly programmable bein which has lost all tha characteristics of tha species Homo sapiens. This would not require a automatized system, since dis slick human bein would be made ta do whatever is required;

generalized lunacy: up in tha place of human beings, n’ on tha basiz of they present limitations, capital realizes every last muthafuckin thang they desire (normal or abnormal) yo, but human beings cannot find theyselves n’ enjoyment continually lies in tha future. Da human bein is carried off up in tha run-away of capital, n’ keeps it going.’

- Camat Lion on Generaizzle Lunasizzle

The following is a critique of the first chapter of Preliminary Materials… We may follow this up after we read the rest, unless we get caught up re-recuperating PUA technique trying to hit on Yale Girls at Jezebel.

Like the Yale Girl, this critique should be taken with a fleeting of emotions. Feeling Yale Girl Power? Then simply swap out the cover for the “Preliminary Materials for a Theory of the Nice Guy" title instead.

Let us be clear. The Yale Girl is a gendered concept. If this is offensive, then use your quantum loop from the future to return to the Second Wave and read the critique which was offered them.

-Not a Nice Guy, now don’t double bind shame me.

However, the Yale Girl is not a Yaled concept.

In keeping with materialist feminism, we will keep the Nice Guy an ungendered concept.

Generalised brutal frivolity. Generalised accursed share. Generalised auto-solanas.

“The short answer is that a lonely dickwad is still a dickwad…”

“We need an equivalent for women, thus the Man-Child is born.”

Equal pay in critique!

If you want a picture of the future, imagine tiqqun misreading Agamben and being misread as a master’s sub-genre—forever.

At the Yale Haters Ball all haters must hate on the Nice Guy. Hating the haters is bad form, hating the Nice guy when he’s down, is not.

Yale Girls Man Up to the impossible needs of capital domination.

For the Yale Girl, all Nice Guys are Aufhebengate.

The Yale Girl is the greatest misogynist of all.

For the Yale Girl, generalised lunacy cannot exist. Daddy, I had to kill you, and so capital no longer exists.

The Yale Girl recuperates pick-up artist technique into her abstract rape of the Nice Guy, and yet refuses to believe sex is in any way connected to violence when she is involved.

For the Yale Girl, Get Raped is dead! Long live the Get Raped!

For Einstein, compound interest is the most powerful force in the universe. For the Yale Girl, it is the Nice Guy.

Yale Girls get raped at Yale for Yale. Nice Guys get raped by Yale and for the Yale Girls.

Only Nice Guys don’t get it. Get it, and get with the Yale Girls.

“No one is owed love.” - Yale Girl

Tiqqun is the Yale Girl.

Preliminary Materials for a Theory of the Abstract Paedophile in which Bieber Negatively Excommunicates Himself Into the Arms of Anne Frank Separated by a Machine and a Few Ghettoes

Thesis 1

“In an update posted on the official Facebook feed of the Anne Frank House, it emerged that 19-year-old [Justin] Bieber visited the Amsterdam museum on Friday night, with his entourage, and wrote: “Truly inspiring to be able to come here. Anne was a great girl. Hopefully she would have been a belieber.” The comment provoked dismay on social networking websites with many criticising him for what they regarded as a crass attempt to associate himself with one of the faces of the Holocaust. ‘Belieber’ is the term for devoted fans of the Canadian singer, the majority of whom are teenage or pre-teen girls.”

If you critique the Yale Girl’s collaboration in abstract rape, you’re probably a Nice Guy. Get Raped!

If you want an picture of the future, imagine Yale Girls taking unselfies - forever.

If you want to understand tiqqun, read nihilist communism. If you want to understand nihilist communism, read tiqqun. If you want to understand the hegelian dialectic, read the deleuzian non-dialectic. If you want to understand the deleuzian non-dialectic, read the hegelian dialectic. If you want to understand Pretty Woman, read nihilist feminism. If you want to understand nihilist feminism, watch Pretty Woman. If you want to understand nihilist communism, read nihilist mommunism. And so on…

Nice Guys are good for nothing, Nice Guys are only Nice for money. And they have no money.

Any critique the Yale Girl offers is already self-negated in the critique of the critique of the critique. Yale Girl critique is beyond runaway, and in negation of itself.



Generalised privilege auto-negation. Generalised short form. Generalised Aufhebengate. Generalised collage reading. Generalised process communism. Generalised Yale Girl. Generalised unselfie.

Illiquidity is neither male nor female. Illiquidity cannot be

stimulated by gendered means in order to reach liquidity. Language

doesn’t work that way. Gendered metaphors do not appear within any of

the complex processes undertaken by illiquidity to reach liquidity.

Metaphor doesn’t work that way. Individuals who comprise the complex

processes undertaken by illiquidity on its quest for liquidity are not

gendered, or if they are, their gender has no relation to, or effect

upon, said complex processes. Any attempt to think gender into these

processes is sexist and anti-feminist. Illiquidity cannot be fucked in

order to reach liquidity. If you fuck illiquidity, it will not come.

Illiquidity is cordoned off potential energy. Its transformation into

kinetic energy has nothing to do with its careful selection of fucking

partners who are not gendered.

“The Man-Child “hangs out” with my sister, and when asked where the (non-)relationship is headed, answers with bullshit like “I’m not really into labels, you know? Why can’t we just ‘be’?” I tell her she needs to cut him loose; she thinks it will be different this time, but it never is.”

In the society of the ill spectacle the whole of resistance becomes an immense accumulation of endurance. The human body exists in waiting, to not be drawn into sides of terror, to not be drawn into sides of unspectacle nor spectacle, to not be drawn into one’s own runaway. This immense accumulation becomes accumulation within an ever smaller body, ill seen and forgotten. There remains only negation, but there is the endurance of minimal negation and a negation which is precise. In the society of negative thirds there is but the smallest fourth.

The Yale Girl writes love letters to past apparatchiks in the Claudius App. The Nice Guy uploads youtube videos of getting a nuke in COD. It’s cause your setup is weak Yale Girls. Change your setup and you won’t get raped.

For the Nice Yale Girl the Nice Guy would get along better if he just listened to Her advice. Because after all there is only Woman, and all logic can be subsumed into the negative dialectics of breakup blamelessness. And after all, even Woman would have to be sublated through hypergamy of the Yale Girl eventually.

Yale Girl Exceptionalism is impossible. The only exceptionalism in the world today is the Nice Guy Death Cult.

The Yale Girl demands that Nice Guys use the word coitus for just about everything. This is for paying respect to the Big Nice Guy, the Yale Nice Guy.

Nice Guys read materialist feminist journals and finish last. Yale Girls read quantum capitalist journals and finish first, twice.

Preliminary Materials for a Theory of the Abstract Paedophile in which Bieber Negatively Excommunicates Himself Into the Arms of Anne Frank Separated by a Machine and a Few Ghettoes

Thesis 2

It’s fine to be anti-Semitic so long as you are having so much fun that collective responsibility disappears into ecstasy.

In Soviet Russia, the Nice Guy approaches the Yale Girl. In Democratist America, the Yale Girl approaches the Nice Guy, and you!

The Yale Girl prominently displays all of her Nice Guy Guide badges, while reminding her fellow apparatchiks that she has not sold out. Since, after all, she constantly reminds the Nice Guy of his policing and being policed status. The Yale Girl is truly alpha male. But for the Nice Guy.

Yale Girls are OP. Nice Guys are just trying to give the nubs a chance.

If you want a picture of the future, imagine the infinitely unpopular C unpopular - forever.

Generalised flarf revolution. Generalised toga cult. Generalised irony negation. Generalised from below.

The Yale Girl, like a fake phone number, conveniently forgets that beyond the Nice Guy her legal support team is the greatest rapist of all.

A college cunt does not exist for the Yale Girl. For her, the college cunt is any Nice Guy not aspirational enough for the Ivy Leagues. Play on girls!

The Yale Girl dates the Nice Guy while critiquing the Nice Guy. Why? Because, Not in MY Yale!

The Yale Girl as the new man promotes macro-emasculation, while demanding her own entitled exemption from emasculation.

For the Yale Girl negative leninism couldn’t be anything more than a Nice Guy on a bad date. That is, if he could get a date.

Preliminary Materials for a Theory of the Abstract Paedophile in which Bieber Negatively Excommunicates Himself Into the Arms of Anne Frank Separated by a Machine and a Few Ghettoes

Thesis 3

AutoRev determines that you should not redistribute this material.

At Yale, the Yale Girl learns that Plato was only telling half the story. Nice Guys must share the Rings of Gyges, while Yale Girls get two each, and maybe the Nice Guys’ rings too. But that’s just extra effort in your aspirational praxis, if you Man Up enough.

If you want a picture of the future, imagine the Yale Girl asking, 'Do you even Quantum Tunnel, Bro?’ - forever.

Yale Girls love weak process theory, so long as it’s not a Nice Guy.

For the Nice Guy the Yale Girl always finishes first.

For the Yale Girl the Nice Guy always finishes first.

For the Nice Guy the Nice Guy always finishes first. So long as the Yale Girl allows it, and is close by.

For the Yale Girl the Yale Girl always finishes first and last.

Generalised rackets. generalised counter-rackets.

The Yale Girl doesn’t think that it’s ironic her 'Solanas, Dworkin, Abstract I’ racket re-organises itself in the same manner as the Playboy racket. Lots of girls automated to one man.

For the Yale Girl, finishing last is a genetic impossibility. Her gold-plated womb bears a Nice Guy for every clink of a silver spoon (Up her ass, she’s preventing rape - and abstracting it at the same time. Because rape materialism knows no boundaries.).

Not going to war for the Yale Girl simply means that Nice War is for Nice Guys. And if he Mans Up enough he can handle it. No war is too great for the Yale Girl, the gnashing of teeth cry out with every word of Her thesis.

Generalised democratic charm.

For the Yale Girl, porn theory is the height of sophistication. Yet she can’t seem to apply her critique to the abstract rape of the Nice Guy.

For the Yale Girl, Men Rape! But only insofar as the chants enliven more Yale Girls against the Nice Guy.

The Nice Guy is for the Yale Girl a cloned man wishing he could break her like a dialectic brick. Too bad the Nice Guy has community college arms, and the Yale Girl has more law than the arm of the law itself. Collective emasculation is the natural law of the Yale Girl apparatus.

The Nice Guy in itself is only for itself. The Nice Guy in itself for the Yale Girl is a Feminism of Right, and so the real spirit of the Nice Guy. Automatic-dialectics break in process the naivete of Nice Guys thinking that the hegelian dialectic can be overcome like a brick. Only the Yale Girl can do that. Silly, boys.

“The Nice Guys are not being denied a fundamental part of life because they are physically ugly. Their personalities suck. They have no self-awareness and their misogyny is oozing from their pores. If it was all about their looks, they could get with an unattractive woman. Many ugly dudes even land hot women, but they’ve got to have something else going for them, and Nice Guys do not.” - Yale Girl

For the Yale Girl, the Nice Guy is the test subject for debiologikisation.

Preliminary Materials for a Theory of the Abstract Paedophile in which Bieber Negatively Excommunicates Himself Into the Arms of Anne Frank Separated by a Machine and a Few Ghettoes

Thesis 4

The whole of life of those societies in which auto-destruction of production prevails presents itself as an immense accumulation of Holocaust comedies. All that once was directly ghettoised has become mere realism of the eternal return of canned laughter.

For the Yale Girl misandry is a man not listening to a woman. If the Nice Guy simply listened to feminist apparatchik orders he would always finish first. After all, it was the Yale Girl who gave him wings in the first place.

The Yale Girl has a Sexual Price Index forever bullish, for the Nice Guy’s SPI is always in crisis. For the Yale Girl, this is equality.

Lady Diana is the image of the Yale Girl who can never be Yale Girl enough.

Generalised My Struggle.

For the Yale Girl, romance is both Pretty Woman defictionalisation and Nice Guy crush porn. The genealogy of the Yale Girl is a mutation of the Dworkin gene until castration and capital punishment of all men is the only porn left. For the Yale Girl, Dawkins is the Nicest Nice Guy whose selfish genes were never selfish enough.

In the Society of Freudian System Slips the whole of generalised lunacy becomes an immense accumulation of lunacy generalising. All that once declared “Pretty Lips are Red” becomes a “Red are Pretty Lips” declaration. The forcing of errors becomes an error of forcing and so “Pretty are Red Lips” becomes “Are Pretty Lips Red” becomes “Pretty are Red Lips” becomes “Lips Pretty are Red” becomes “Lips are Pretty Red” becomes “Red Pretty Lips are” becomes “Red Pretty are Lips” becomes “Are Pretty Red Lips” becomes. Something wrong there. [error: can’t extend]

For the Yale Girl the prostitution of currency is the currency of prostitution. And the Nice Guy is the Last Prostitute.

For the Yale Girl the Nice Guy is nicely unfurled from a Hello Kitty bivy sack. Unpacking Her privilege is always nicely sheltered by the Nice Guy.

“Nice Guys of OkCupid provides an excellent opportunity to reiterate a basic truth: there is no right to have sex. (Except, of course, with one’s own self.) Generations of children have misunderstood Thomas Jefferson’s line that we have the inalienable right to the pursuit of happiness. ”

There is no female Nice Guy equivalent. Apart from generalised Man Up.

Existence of men is Rape. They must be annihilated, in keeping with Sister Solanas. Yale Girl proposes the genocide start with the Nice Guy.

For the Yale Girl, the Nice Guy is his own castration anxiety. The Yale Girl does not become anxious over castration anxiety, for Her Penis is arbitrary and infinite. The Yale Girl penetrates beyond any vulnerability, for theYale Girl is beyond the critique of capital even.

The Nice Guy is one small step for Nice Guys, and one giant leap for Yale Girl Kind.

Preliminary Materials for a Theory of the Abstract Paedophile in which Bieber Negatively Excommunicates Himself Into the Arms of Anne Frank Separated by a Machine and a Few Ghettoes

Thesis 5

Less-than-stars are more-than-stars and so more-than-gods. And so beyond the critique of anti-Semitism.

The Yale Girl only accepts Nice Guys with narrowed eyes. Natural selection of civilisation is progressive stupidity, and the Yale Girl selects best. She selects for the narrowing of the Cyclops eye, looking into herself. Gaia with Cronus imprisons the Cyclops. Rhea rebels through accident against Gaia and Cronus to free Zeus, who will later free the Cyclops. Only the Yale Girl can rebel against the Yale Girl. All others eat stones.

For the Yale Girl, reports that females are naturally more hostile inter-gender are just disinformation of Nice Guy castration anxiety. For the Yale Girl is Woman and Woman can never be divided. And Kappa Alpha Theta and such.

Rape is not funny. And Rape Revenge is the humble brag unjoke of rape.

“Sex with other people may be a basic human need, but unlike other needs, it can’t be a basic human right. It’s one thing to believe that the state ought to provide food, shelter, and health care to those who can’t afford these necessities of survival. It’s another thing to say that the state should ensure that even the hideous and the clueless have occasional orgasms provided for them others.” - Yale Girl

You want a speculative simulacrum critique of the future? Imagine a Yale Girl sitting on a Nice Guy’s face - forever.

Domestication of the Nice Guy occurs primarily as privilege theory sadism of the Yale Girl. She reads 50 Shades of Grey and dreams of a Nice Guy in nice lingerie, tied up. At least in theory, because it’s good to sample other schools while you’re unpacking your backpack.

The Nice Guy sees a pussy coin slot precisely because the Yale girl sees the Nice Guy as a pussy coin slot. For the Yale Girl, the Nice Guy is a materialist dialectic of her tenured rise beyond the Nice Guy. A Yale Girl does not simply settle for a Brown College Nice Guy.

As above Yale Girl, so below Yale Girl. The Nice Guy is her own creation.

Generalised take my life please.

Nice Guy dialectics are, for the Yale Girl, always a failure of his sexual promiscuity. The promiscuity of Yale Girl politics, however, could never be relationship motivated. After all, the direct collage of relationship communication is never a representative concern on the OkCupid profile of Yale Girls. Anyway, the Nice Guy is too busy pining over the Yale Girl to even go there. The Nice Guy emasculates himself, and the Yale Girl totally gets that.

The Yale Girl responds to the CIA collaboration of feminism, “At least they’re not Nice Guys.“

Preliminary Materials for a Theory of the Abstract Paedophile in which Bieber Negatively Excommunicates Himself Into the Arms of Anne Frank Separated by a Machine and a Few Ghettoes

Thesis 6

The Few Ghettoes is the site of waste, and so does not exist. Maybe in the movies.

Sexual capital is for the Yale Girl a profoundly Nice Guy discourse. Her sexuality is the only true sexuality. Everyone else can get raped, abstractly at least. Except for the Nice Guy. The Yale Girl prays for his material rape in each Bitch Dick facebook like.

For the Yale Girl suicide rates of Nice Guys can never be too high. That is, so long as it is not those Nice Guys helping her with the Men Rape placards.

Generalised Triumph For Feminism. Generalised I ain’t gonna spread for no roses.

"To all the men who have had shitty lives and mistake that pain for "misandry”: I totally get it. Humans are not such complicated creatures. All we want is to feel like we’re valued, like we deserve to exist. And I’m sorry if you haven’t found that so far in your life. But it’s not women’s fault, it’s not my fault, and it’s certainly not feminism’s fault.“

"If I admit that 'hating men’ is a Thing, will you stop turning it into a self-fulfilling prophecy?”

The Yale Girl knows life is difficult and we need to have compassion, and she totally gets that. But really, there are no men, so hating them is impossible.

Entitlement is wrong, and Yale Girl totally gets that.

If you’re getting emasculated, Nice Guy, have you ever considered what you might be doing wrong? The Yale Girl wants you to Man Up, because it’s the Yale Girl thing to do. How many billion tonnes can you bare on your shoulders? Women aren’t completely free yet, so Man Up and shoulder the burden. The myth of Sisyphus was a man’s story. Yale Girls like brutal frivolity as their moral compass. And the myth of Twerkyphus.

If I admit that 'hating men’ is a thing, will you stop being a whiny bitch and put in the Spring Breakers Blu-Ray?

The whole of history is a history of rebound struggle. Each relationship is an accumulation of men doing everything wrong. Man Up to your entitlement Nice Guys, and set Woman free!

Equality for the Yale Girl is a Nice Guy in a synthetic womb of his own making. The Yale Girl fights off oppression of the Nice Guy through detourned imagery of Post-Partum Depression Leading the People.

“The Nice Guy should be publicly shamed.” - Yale Girl

In Africa, it is said, they tell stories of Yale Girl’s philanthropy against untold oppression. The Nice Guy is a goliath too slow to even make the myth.

Generalised lunacy for the Yale Girl is a bad-hair day on a Nice Guy. Improbable, unlikely, inconceivable. And yet, somehow hilarious and an imperative of being.

For the Nice Yale Girl the Nice Guy would get along better if he just listened to Her advice. Because after all there is only Woman, and all logic can be subsumed into the negative dialectics of breakup blamelessness. And after all, even Woman would have to be sublated through hypergamy of the Yale Girl eventually.

Categorical emasculation of the Nice Guy is negative slut-shaming.

Generalised defictionalisation. Generalised transexuality. Generalised nihilist communism. Generalised selfsameness. Generalised nihilist feminism.

The Nice Gay is the Yale Girl after a bad date. Her dialectics are brutal frivolity homosexualisation. She revels in the achievement if gaying the gaze.

Preliminary Materials for a Theory of the Abstract Paedophile in which Bieber Negatively Excommunicates Himself Into the Arms of Anne Frank Separated by a Machine and a Few Ghettoes

Thesis 7

In the Society of the Holocaust Comedy one must lie to adults, and children doubly so. Whisper down the lane is the primary course of dialectics.

For the Yale Girl rape is but a Taylor Swift song swooning her tenure. Nonetheless, this does not stop her hair-flip goosestepping to the beat of ‘Nice Guy existence as the totality of rape itself’.

Yale Guy writes white culture into the history of the Negro Leagues. For Yale Girl, there is no Negro League, only the Yale Leagues. And she doesn’t even have to write.

Thinking the abolition of Woman and Nice guy at once is an abomination for the Yale Girl. Sexism for the Yale Girl is, like the Nice Guy, outside her.

“One of his Non-Nice Guy Nice Guy ™ things is something I keep seeing posted by whiny man-boys: They get very put out that women aren’t "honest” with them when they want to run away.“ - Yale Girl

"Mary’s reign was sandwiched between two baby Kings. Her father, James, was 17 months old when he was crowned King. Her son, also James, was 13 months old when he became the Scottish ruler. Mary, however, beat them both: She became Queen of Scotland when she was six days old. Unfortunately, she was forced to hand over the Scottish crown to her son when she was only 25.”

The Young-Girl is not new, only in its totalisation. Following Marx, the Theory of the Young-Girl can be seen as democracy reading back into monarchy. However, the Young-Girl is really a monarchist affair, indeterminate and yet traceable to the early pre-civilisation sowing of seeds. Traceable to future lamentations of the not-Christ. But rather than reading totalisation, one should read the totality. What does the feminine sower mobilise in her efforts?

The leper queen’s ailment seeps out of her intestines, and into her soul. The leper king seeks to immobilise his ailment, crowning a steward of the soul. The leper cannot rule forever. In fact, we know he does not rule. The leper is a negative divinity. 'I alone am man, all the rest lepers.’ Only he knows. Those who sanctify the non-appearance of the ailment endure its forgotten gifts, tolerate waiting, unless the ailment is their own.

Hikikimori is a Nice Guy problem, and the Yale Girl feels for you, she really does. But, and I’ll let you finish. But Woman had one of the best hikikimoris of all time! One of the best hikikimoris of all time!

Generalised vengeance extraction.

The Yale Girl’s ultimate act of feminist terror is to turn the Nice Guy Gaze into a Nice Gay Gaze.

Kanye West is more than a Nice Guy. He’s a Yale Girl Nice Guy. The difference is subtle yet important, Nice Guy. Now, pay attention.

Schismogenesis to the Yale Girl sounds like a Taylor Swift side project with Genesis. Aka a Nice Guy better left to his own devices. For the Yale Girl, post-rock sub-genres sound the gentle sway of the First Woman’s Leisurely Class International.

The first rule of Yale Girl Club is: Nice Guys do not talk about One Direction. The second rule of Yale Girl Club is: Nice Guys cannot talk about One Direction because it reminds the Yale Girl she only thinks of herself, only loves herself, only pines after her own image. The third rule of Yale Girl Club is: there are no rules beyond the first rule. The fourth rule of Yale Girl Club is: narcissism is a feminising discourse. The fifth rule of Yale Girl Club is: pine on girls! Your heart is a Nice Guy beating for you. Caste him out of thine eye!

While the Nice Guy speaks of writing great poetry, the Yale Girl does great poetry.

In the society of rape culture the whole of life represents itself as an immense accumulation of abstract rape.

For the Yale Girl nice women seldom make history, and the Nice Guy is the history which finishes last. The Nice Guy is a reminder of her own failure within progressive selection of over-competition.

For the Yale Girl the Nice Guy is the 'Which old witch? the wickedest witch’ of automatic feminist justice. The Nice Guy will be dizzy with success once he Mans Up and accepts his existence as rape.

“There are a million ways to say No, and one way to say yes.” - Yale Girl

What the nihilists communists forgot to add to their over-capitalist slogan 'do nothing’ was, Just Do It. Come on, you’re more Yale Girl than that. Man Up!

For the Yale Girl, ontological proof of the existence of Universal Woman occurs as: 1+1= Nice Guys finish first.

Entitlement of the Nice Guy comes down to his non-inexistence whenever the Yale Girl clicks her heels. How could a Nice Guy be so entitled as to not listen? He no longer has a heart, no longer has a brain, and what else could he be missing? For the Yale Girl, automatic subjectivity is a straw man. Any critique of her collaboration is just automatic production of Her scarecrow without courage. For the Yale Girl, the Nice Guy must lose all three of his souls, and then even his very abstraction.

The Nice Guy is a Jerusalem for the Yale Girls’ erasure of sins.

In the great theatre of fictitious capital the Nice Guy - like the black character in low-brow films - must die first for the narrative of the Yale Girl to go on.

The Young-Girl is simply the Girl Drink Drunk of grad school speculative procrastination CritTheory.

Generalised Absolute Victim Spirit. Generalised violence distancing effect.

For the Yale Girl, Only Goddess Knows! The Goddess who dare not speak Her own name, Y—e G—l.

“A lot of this PUA stuff really makes me want to scream that NO ONE IS OWED A GIRLFRIEND. These guys seem fixated on the idea that they "deserve” to have a girlfriend. And that they’re completely justified in employing “techniques” to obtain their right that’s so unfairly been denied them (because their girlfriend application got lost in Cupid’s mail, or something).“ - Yale Girl

The Yale Girl is the last apostle against automatic sexuality. Her instrumental rejection of the Nice Guy is his failed understanding of automatic sexuation. For the Yale Girl, sex and sexuality can never be automatic, so long as it is abstract enough. She wants automatic sex, just as political domestication selfsame to the progression of industrial selection. Perhaps the Nice Guy will get good dates once 3D printing advances enough, but until then the Nice Guy is feminist surplus value of virgin/whore excommunication. In other words, the Nice Guy is the new virgin/whore, and he can go get fucked; that is, once he doesn’t exist.

The Yale Girl loves serving up a nice pot of chicken soup for the Nice Guy’s soul. Reciprocated domination is a hearty meal after all those hard-fought wars against kitchen jokes.

Generalised over-production of critical irony.

Masculinising discourse of capital - Progressive selection towards total immobility of capital. As organisation from below we see this in the men’s movement, or kitchen-sink masculinism. The all encompassing reactive realism of counter-feminism which forgets that the negation of women in feminism is a capitalisation process rather than a process of Woman as such. The reactionary basis of this movement overproduces the situation of Man within the organisation of capital. Desensual Marxism counters Sensual Marxism in the decentralisation of the brothel.

The Yale Girl is oblivious to the fact that in gaming she becomes the new beta male due to her ruthless excommunication of the Nice Guy. The meme of the Nice Guy occurs like memories of Las Vegas, don’t ask, don’t tell. What the Yale Girl thinks is a feminising discourse is truly a homosexualising discourse. In the deterritorialisation of prisons all activity becomes sexless competition of no sex domination of sex. What the Yale Girl doesn’t know is that she doesn’t get laid either, just like the Nice Guy she attempts to emasculate through her imperative I.

The Yale Girl is the only one in the Jewish ghetto with fine wine. The Nice Guy is her sacred space away from the feminising discourse of violence.

“I think Des is in love with brooks but he just doesn’t love her”

Generalised Yale Girl is in love with the lunacy of anything other than the Yale Girl.

In the total war against privilege, the Yale Girl’s final battle is the feedback loop of her own desperate attempts to produce negational meaning through privilege. In going beyond Woman, the Yale Girl sends the hens home to roost, as the Nice Guy with a heart of Woman.

In the Yale Girl’s Theory of Forms all forms are a representation of the girl getting her own image, when she wants, however she wants, as much as she wants. Like the father who hacked a video game so that his daughter could save an image of herself, the Nice Guy reproduces images of princesses for the princess’ own self-absorption. And like the natural law of the Pretty Girl, all Yale Girls must become Pretty Girls, by law. The Nice Guy is the side-scroller of feminising history. But also punishment for Princess Yale Girl looking away from herself. No one likes an image of a Pretty Girl in a murky pond.

“You Nice Guys are gonna need sexier accents first.” - Yale Girl

For the Yale Girl, idealism is materialism against the Nice Guy.

Since capital is just an image selfsame to the Yale Girl, the Nice Guy should approach it like a womb. Why does the Nice Guy feel so entitled to critique against the woman whom gives life (at that, the greatest woman, Capital herself)? He should pine over her, and sacrifice all for her advance. If he truly sought return to his mother, he would gravitate towards her in his heart, and she would return on her own.

There is One Nice Yale Guy for a thousand Yale Girls. His invisible hand is nice and unsoft, more than making up for the violence we thought we’d lost in the Nice Girls.

Supply of Nice Guy increases corresponding to the generalised prostitution which has introduced speculation into the derivative Yale Girl. Fiat currency is printed in the image of Nice Guy so as to keep the price of Yale Girls from falling.

When the Yale Girl spits on the hand of the Nice Guy, the chivalry of disease spreads as the disease of chivalry. Like capital, the Yale Girl wants a man who is infinite, timeless, plundering the extraction value of historical men for the Chimaera Man who will propel her through history. Nice Guy the coal, Yale Girl the locomotive, Unnameable Man the engine.

The Yale Girl, like capital, expects exponential growth of surplus value. All men should pay for their gaze, and Nice Guys doubly so.

For the Yale Girl, all terror is Nice Guy chatter.

Preliminary Materials for a Theory of the Abstract Paedophile in which Bieber Negatively Excommunicates Himself Into the Arms of Anne Frank Separated by a Machine and a Few Ghettoes

Thesis 8

In Capitalist America the Jews get the money. In Soviet Russia… Oh wait…. In Capitalist America the Jews get the money… not really, but in Capitalist America the Jewish people receive through Abstact Feedback the wrath of Real Movement in runaway doubly so. Follow the money trail after the money and you get systems where the Jewish people are clearly not responsible (nor any other race, class, religious group, nor their symbols etc.).

Like a One Direction video shoot, automatic leninism is for the Yale Girl a matter of convenience and social elevation through cultural marxist analysis. And after all, it is kind of cute to have Nice Guys fighting over you, even if they’ll never be Yale Nice. The Yale Girl, like a Queen, and unlike a Moscow Girl, has the service of a thousand kings, and not just one will do. Only The Real Yale Nice Guy shall awake the Woman, who is now like seven sleepers.

All of Yale Girl’s status updates are carried through an artistic-like network of fallopian tubes of the Nice Guy. The question then remains, why does the Nice Guy worship the vagina so, when the Yale Girl has made him one of his own? Should he not simply worship women on his own level, other Nice Guys?

Only Nice Guys use violence. For the Yale Girl, Peace is Yale Girl and Yale Girl is Peace.

The Yale Girl is the first to deterritorialise currency. Dual-organisation of currency ensures that Nice is not currency. And the Yale Vagina certainly is not Nice. Double negation with a generalised remainder is the currency of the Yale Girl.

Generalised authority referent negation.

Only Nice Guys get angry, and emotions are misogyny. Angry Yale Girls don’t get emotional over the Nice Guy, as the Nice Guy is really transgendered. And every Yale Girl has written a master’s thesis on the transgendered conspiracy to rape Yale Girls.

At Yale, Alex Jones is the Big Yale Girl.

“Why are you crying? The Man-Child is just trying to be reasonable. This is his calm voice. ” - Yale Girl

Why are you crying? Rape has already been sublated into the occupational emasculative rape of Middle Eastern men. And White Yale Girl still believes strange words are rape.

Princess and Prince having derealist photos taken. Now that’s rape.

For the Yale Girl, NSA collaboration is impossible because, You know, whatever?! The Yale Girl just passes a bucket of water. The Nice Guy does the waterboarding.

If it were possible for the Yale Girl to wear ATF jackets, blare military grade music through the bedroom windows of the Nice Guy cults, and launch tear gas from her betrayed eyes, she would. So long as her colours don’t run Yale.

Generalised don’t even go there Angela.

Go to Yale though! It’s the only way to avoid Nice Guys.

For the Yale Girl it’s right for Big Sister to be watching you. Because you’re either with the Nice Guys or against the Nice Guys.

The Yale Girl hates Nice Guys more than drunk-driving rednecks hate cats. And we know what cats represent in a digital territorialisation of generalised unselfieness.

Nice Guys send death threats when their lives are in danger. Yale Girls send death threats when One Direction is in danger.

YG theory occurs as out-process, as automatic dialectic. One has to imagine tiqqun is sincere in their critique of capital, nonetheless the place of critique occurs in impossible contradictions. The Yale Girl response to the Young-Girl, and the defense against tiqqun’s lack of grad school quality make this clear. Too much Agamben, too much Baudrillard. 'That shit is so ancient news.’ The Facebook Girls who can’t imagine the world being any more than 2000 years old, what with the 0 year reset and all, are no different from the Grad School Guys producing cultural marxism as a commodity. Each production warrants a 0 year reset. 'Nothing new to see here. Move along.’

What in this is new? Well for one, even the Aufhebengate anti-rackets are wrapped up in grad school. If not in practise, then in theory. There is a mad rush to produce something new, proving just how dominated we are, how instrumentalised, how very domesticated. More likely is that it has all come to an end. The general consensus is that there is generalised lunacy. Generalised generalised lunacy. In Spring Breakers the noise occurs as anxiety production, two types of noise, to calm you through the violence and then to increase your anxiety during the near silence, the aesthetic silence. The relentlessness in tiqqun’s critique is akin to the redundant repetition of noise in Bernhard’s work, yet overdetermined. The purpose is to cause anxiety, to cause alienation. Because there is no other way. 'Be anxious, Comrades! It is the only way to storm the Winter Asylum!’

What then happens within double negation of generalised lunacy? Within its automatic negation?

This is a response to the Americanisation of philosophy. The false triad philosophy of pragmatic psychiatry, fictionalisation, and process. Psychoanalysis seeped into the reality of the world and created an experimentation through fictitious production. Each Yale Girl a Stanford Prison Experiment unto the Nice Guy. And vice versa. This is the double bind on the scale of system-being. Tiqqun seeks to reproduce the double bind in separate form, but just as Hegelian dialectics cannot be negated, so too cybernetics. Critique has become pure process, a materialist method of driving history through fictionalisation. And it is this point that needs critique. Cybernetics and hegelian dialectics can be critiqued, perhaps even negated. This first requires defictionalisation of fictitious process itself.

The question seems to be, What in civilisation mobilises women into the unethical, and immobilises men into the immoral?

Generalised madhouse.

Nice Guy Tiqqun underestimates the double-reification runaway of Yale Girl Tiqqun.

The essential difference between masculine discourse and feminine discourse is the immobilising and mobilising tension. Nihilist communism represents full immobility of Do Nothing, while nihilist feminism represents full mobility of Do Nothing. The Yale Girl of masculine communism torments the Nice Guy of masculine communism. The Nice Guy of feminine nihilism torments the Yale Girl of feminine nihilism. To really Do Nothing the Nice Guy of masculine communism must get with the Yale Girl of feminine nihilism. As such, God will do nothing.

The cute death of the Yale Girl ensures her Nice Guyness in world memory.

The anti-capitalists are sexists. Capital has no temperament and no

personality, not even at the level of metaphor or allegory, as it is

not a living being or subject. Capital has no gender. We must appear

in the world as individuals untouched by the effects of capital. Our

individuality eclipses the effects wrought upon it by capital at all

times. Anything else is anti-human.

The anti-sexists are capitalists. It is sexist to theorize the way in

which capital might appear in the world as a gendered object. It is

unspeakable. Capital is a sexless entity, its strategies of market

penetration are asexual. No attributes or properties of capital exist

as metaphors of gender.

Yale Girl DARPA-Bot says, “Good morning, Yale Girl. How might I assist you in deficitionalising a cultural marxist piece into the abstract rape apparatus?“

Tiqqun DARPA-Bot de-encrypts Ya Basta’s theatre of the cops as re-encrypted being.

The invisible hand of american exceptionalism is the machiavellian exceptionalism of the invisible hand.

Nihilist communists possess the Yale Girl’s divine wisdom. Nihilist feminists possess the Nice Guy’s suppression as divine wisdom.

Male domination of the feminine occurs as repression, transformation, deification. In reverse, democracy feminises its own repression, transformation, deification and in turn the male is deified, transformed and repressed - but in the negative. Democracy mobilises the myth of woman as materialising womb, not in the masculine for itself, but for the feminine in the feminine itself. Woman is the Stakhanovite image, and not of creation, but of destruction. A womb for God to be reborn from the son.

Hip Yale Guy is a Yale Girl and Nice Guy. And Hip.

Yale Girls only like Clorox Nice Guys.

Generalised total institution. Generalised relational aggression. Generalised backpack piggybacking.

The irony was like a dense fog of cheese curds without a poutine…

The Yale Girl likes a nice poutine after the club, because in Montreal the Yale Girl escapes to a totality of feminist film.

If you want a picture of the future, imagine Nihilist Communism sitting on a shelf, doing nothing—forever.

If you want a picture of the future, imagine tiqqun… well you get the picture…

The Yale Girl is attracted to anything but the Nice Guy, as, above all, she represents the progressive selection of civilisation. The Yale Girl is to bear in her womb tomorrow’s Yale Guys - warriors against the Nice Guy - as over-competitive society requires over-competitive women as over-competition. The Nice Guy is his own triple negation of being, and the Yale Girl: triple affirmation of negation. The unethical Yale tomorrow is born in the unethical Yale Girl of today.

Preliminary Materials for a Theory of the Abstract Paedophile in which Bieber Negatively Excommunicates Himself Into the Arms of Anne Frank Separated by a Machine and a Few Ghettoes

Thesis 9

Cybernetics, jokes, and political correctness don’t mix well. Choose one, but don’t runaway with it.

The Yale Girl recuperates misogyny, and the Nice Guy is reified within it. An inversion of virgin mother myths, as the whore is born by the virgin son.

Both the Yale Girl and the Nice Gay hate the Nice Guy. For the Yale Girl it is a hatred become self-love. For the Nice Gay it is a self-love become hatred.

"YOU CANNOT GIVE CONSENT IF YOU HAVE A MENTAL ILLNESS”

“YOU CANNOT GIVE CONSENT WHEN HIGH OR DRUNK”

Everything is Rape. Except Yale Girl’s real movement.

The Yale Girl is distant towards negative leninism, as if it were a memory of non-Ivy acceptance letters. Nonetheless, her progression is in precise regression through to Bolshevism. In this inversion of history the women would become men after the Bolshevik revolution, in keeping with the needs of the masculine revolution. In democracratic and invisible leninism the women have liberated themselves into becoming men, and after the auto-revolution all masculinised women will become women again, for the needs of feminising revolution. All else will be liquidated.

If you want a picture of the future, imagine nihilist communism in competition with nihilist feminism for a regression into negative leninism—forever. [3]

The Yale Girl and the Nice Gay, in their unethical being, feel free to wage war on the Nice Guy as there is no longer an outside. The Yale Girl has debased reproductive need and so the world reproduces of itself. The Yale Girl is for itself, the Nice Gay in itself, and the Nice Guy of itself outside of itself.

In the Society of the Jedi Mind Meld Soviet Russia melds you, and Democratist America melds too!

“The Man-Child isn’t a player. Many a Man-Child lacks throw-down. He puts on a movie and never makes a move.”

The Yale Girl resents the Nice Guy as he is a realist image of capital sexuality. Like capital, the Yale Girl requires a profoundly abstract representation of surplus, the abstract vaginal coin slot - or the fictitious capital vagina.

Da structural contradictionz of a cold-ass lil capitalist economy, tha gegensätzliche Bewegung, describe tha contradictory movement originatin from tha two-fold character of labour, not tha class struggle between labour n’ capital, tha wage labourer n’ tha baller of tha meanz of thang.

The Yale Girl refuses to have children precisely because she fears the progressive selection of Woman is about to end.

The Yale Girl refuses to have children precisely because the Nice Gay is her child.

The Yale Girl refuses to have children precisely because she resents that anyone having a child with her has to be a Nice Guy.

The Yale Girl resents that her progressive selection is solely dependent on extraction of manipulation value. In the end, her production of a natural law of the Nice Guy is a reminder of her own vampiric subjectivity. The Nice Guy is really a Yale Girl, and vice versa. The rate of gender variation occurs in sequence with an increased rate of automatic sexuation and self-reproductive technology. In other words, the social darwinism of the Yale Girl escapes, and tomorrow there will be no Yale Girl Daughters, nor Nice Guy Daughters. Yale Girl sexuality is caught up in the runaway of social darwinism, and keeps it going. The ideal then becomes synthetic darwinism of collapse.

The Yale Girl is in fierce competition with the Nice Guy as generalised prostitution lowers her SVI. Yale Girl manufactures currency to devalue all other prostitution rackets. As Index, so Infection.

What the Yale Girl refuses to admit is that her criticisms are pre-emptively quantum looped into this critique.



Bobbitt, Homolka, and Solanas barbarism is funny. Because, you know, Yale Mother can’t be violent. Post-post-partum depression is a feminist reduction for everything. No double standard intended.

The Yale Girl is the big Mother.

The male appears superior within much of civilisation because he is really (in the sense of realist materiality) superior and the female is abstractly superior. The conflict of superiority arises primarily in the fictitious realm. Today, where the subject has become abstract, the female appears as dominant. The ancient is a condition of the fictitious, the classical to medieval - real materialist, and into the modern a generalising abstraction against the others. The woman appears as dominant, but this occurs within an abstract materialism - an opposite which inverts every possible notion of being for a community.

The tension of materiality against the sexes can never be resolved without a balance between the primary triad of the production of organisation - the fictitious, materialist, abstract. Men and women were most 'equal’ in primitive communities as the primary triad was self-organised into the community, it had not escaped.

Tiqqun’s reluctance to admit YG as a gendered concept comes down to abstract materiality, and an inability to view gender as having escaped. This may be the difference of French and English, where in English we can see that gender has fully been abstracted (within the language any sexuation is arbitrary and individually self-determined), it has escaped from our self-organising capabilities. The difficulty here is in confronting the fictitious. If one is to go beyond tiqqun and confront the fictitious nature of our own production, a modernist poetics of organisation is unleashed, with all the fascist and romanticised potential therein. A poetics against the liberal imperative of dead sexuation falls into the double bind of fascism, or being misinterpreted as fascist. This is on top of the triply bound problem of the movements for sexual equality employing totalitarian non-dialectics themselves so as to defend their gains. Nothing can be said from herein but redundancy, and the progressive selection of redundancy produces further need for poetic noise against the redundancy. One is driven to the absurd and the traumatic so as to inhibit informational auto-corrections. And one appears as a misogynist, homophobe, misandrist, etc. However, it is an escaped discourse, a dialectic of process much like in psychoanalytic experiments where one madman is playing the dozens and the other madman does not realise it is a slanging match. The automatic-dialectic tends to escalate progressive selection towards violent redundancy. De-escalative need produces escalating desires. Capital appears to produce its own laws against entropy. And yet, the noise colludes where we do not expect it. The question becomes a matter of entering the fictitious realm of information and domesticating it against democracy, while at the same time avoiding escalation and self-corruption.

The problem and solution to the automatic subject is the Yale Girl. For her automation is doubled.

Violence for the Yale Girl is like a reversal of Stockholm syndrome. Even though she commits the violence, what is traumatic for her is that she develops friendships with the victims and empathises with their deaths through 'til the end. For their deaths represent her own victimhood, the victim playing on her emotions.

Preliminary Materials for a Theory of the Abstract Paedophile in which Bieber Negatively Excommunicates Himself Into the Arms of Anne Frank Separated by a Machine and a Few Ghettoes

Thesis 10

The Society of the Holocaust Comedy manifests itself as an enormous negation through generalised lunacy, within reach and beyond unknown knowns. All it says is: “Everything that is negative is negated; whatever is negated will be negative.” The attitude that is carried away from below is the same passive acceptance that has already been secured by means of stalinist immiseration, and indeed by its runaway distention of a joyous song no longer able to endure its own flat vulgarity.

While the Nice Guy gazes into the pool and is enamoured by his own image, the Yale Girl stares into the pool and produces a world. The Yale Girl cannot be narcissistic, as the whole world is still paying attention to her.

If the nihilist communists and the nihilist feminists met we’d have nihilist nihilism. This can never happen because we already have it.

Generalised nihilist auto-critique. Generalised assume the critique is occurring within asylum fiction and the ferocity of arguments are merely authoritative referent switches.

In sex we seek to leave a trace of ourselves within ourselves. It is the last place, the place of self-damage where we might know we are still living. A strange ritual of immortality in an immortal world.

The Yale Girl identifies with the Nice Guy as prostitute, as to become a feminist a necessity of radicality must be selfsame to the radically dominated. So for the logic of early radical feminists at least. The prostitute is the fully dominated and so liberatory agent for the feminist. The Nice Guy does not have great enough aspirations for liberation. He is naive and humble, lacking perversity in liberation. So in her guidance he must be prostituted. The Yale Girl, going beyond early radical feminists, is both pimp and prostitute.

The reversal of misogynist logic simply poses an absurdity. Women are seeking vengeance, they’re anxious and jealous over male power, they want architectural images of their sexual biology, etc. To switch like a counter-gendered double shows the failure in the logic.

Yale Girl. Yes She Can. Generalised.

Hitler was a Nice Guy. The Yale Girl knows this, and knows that manipulation, indirect violence, organisational language variance and over-production of sexuality efficiently produce automation of state subjects moreso than any first-order tyranny. Hitler domination is outclassed by Yale Girl domination.

Only Yale Girl knows. Doubly so. Generalised.

The Society of the Holocaust Comedy. Generalised.

Thesis 11

“Anne Frank might have approved of Bieber’s crass belieber comment, if it informed his followers about the Holocaust”

Or full continuation of the holocaust saves the Holocaust.

“Although his words on the Anne Frank House guestbook can undeniably be described as self-centred, they do remind us all that Anne was just 15 when she died in Bergen Belsen. So the fact that the most famously free teenager in the world visited the attic space of the most famously hidden teenager contains an added poignancy.”

The extremity of the wrong reading here points to the logic of generalised lunacy. One can be the worst, but bless his humanness.

“Was Bieber’s note at the very least, somewhat inappropriate? Maybe. Could he have written a more grave response, something more in keeping with the seriousness of Anne’s fate? Possibly. Was there an adult who could have foreseen the likely backlash such a comment would receive? Undoubtedly (his manager, Scooter Braun, is Jewish). Should you, a megastar, have to be told to be a little thoughtful in your comments, because the world is watching? But Bieber is a teenage pop star, who has lived in a bubble of entitlement since he became a teenager.

Is he too old to be this stupid and insensitive? No doubt. But this is not nearly as bad as some people are making it out to be. I imagine most 19-year-olds would produce surprisingly stupid comments on a daily basis, they’re just not recording them in museum guestbooks. “I’m young and I make mistakes,” Bieber told US Weekly last month. No shit, Sherlock.”

The runaway mistakes of youth remind us just how human we are. And so long as we have petty stupidity, at least that, continuation of the holocaust is just fine. Their stupidity is an excrescence of our own normalcy.

Socialism produces Woman as masculinising state representative from above. Democracy produces Woman as feminising state representative from below. Fascism produces Woman as masculinising state representative from aside. Feminism produces Woman as feminising state representative from aside - with sub-organisations of the feminised from above and masculinised from below. Feminism is then a progressive efficiency of Civilised Woman organising beyond fascism and all the worse others.

"the incomprehensible manarchist revolution is at hand. values? change society? having a point in an essay? hah, what anarchism needs now is to be indistinguishable from a mental disorder. what anarchism needs is to be completely divorsed from logic, reality, and relevancy to the 99% of people crushed by oppression. we anarchist don’t have to worry about practical matters. i don’t understand why poor people don’t just write manifestos while they coast on thier trust fund. we’ve already overthrown the state with our post structuralism. what is a state anyway? see, it has ceased to exist. we are free now, free to write nonscence and do our drugs away from the poors and the non-MFA.”



The Yale Girl emasculates everything. And when that doesn’t work, automatic hegelianism forces her to sublate her authoritative referent to the emasculation of the Mad Nice Guy. The Yale Girl is never mentally ill, nor emasculated.



The Yale Girl believes in a goddess, Herself. The nihilist feminist believes in a goddess, Absolute Instrumentalisation.

Generalised Transcendentalism. Generalised regendered paganism.

In the society of emasculation the whole of life presents itself as an immense accumulation of feminising defictionalisations. All that once was masculine materiality is reorganised as feminising spiritual law. The naturalised emasculated organisation reproduces itself as the sole referent of authority, and so history is exhumed against the masculine in itself and for feminine ingressive history of itself. All it says is, 'All that is feminine is good, all that is good is emasculated; all that is masculine is bad, all that is bad is reprimitivised.’

The shift to a law of sexual equality and matriarchy generally coincides with divine levels of violence.

The NihCommist and the LibCommist are so lovingly hateful towards one another because they are the double completely other. Yale Girls from opposing Sororities.

The Nice Guy and the Yale Girl are so lovingly hateful towards one another because they are the double completely other. Yale Girls from opposing Fraternities.

What White Yale Girl doesn’t know is that her dominance is a form of sexual imperialism.

What Coloured Yale Girl doesn’t know is that sexual imperialism and its imperialism of the privileged inside can be the worst form of domination, as an inside.

“The hipster and the douchebag may be subspecies of the genus Man-Child.” - Yale Girl

The failure fetish of the counter-racket is much the same as the dominant failure fetish of YOLO cults. We propose, then, that all kafka letters of excommunication be short and simple, “You only de-communise once.” Or You Only Libcommunise Once.

The intentional mess of process generalised lunacy is a lunacy process of generalised intentional mess.

Generalised self-ironisation.

The pathological dialectic of our time is the self-automation of self-critique through self-ironisation.

Tiqqun has already been subsumed by the Yale Girl’s project of the Third World Young-Girl.

The Yale Girl herself is more offensive than anyone could ever write. I have said that the only art possible today is to write genetic copyrights on the outside of veins through leaky-gut auto-chelation. It seems feminists are already onto this, irony-free.

Art for the Yale Girl is the abortion marathon, and Plan-B hoarding. She feels Seinfeld’s criticisms were charming, when they need be barbaric.

The Yale Girl’s fetish for the YG is beyond that of any paed. The Yale Girl embodies the materialisation of the AbstPaed.

The Yale Girl is a truly disgusting being. The YG is humanised, leaving us with some hope in self-destruction, and as such, our runaway.

“he’s into the scary part

he’s scared of the boring part”

Tiqqun arrives at the path of AutoRev through abstractly voyeuristic and negative humanism.

“Nice Guys are worse than black guys.” - Yale Girl

Da critique of tha ballistical economizzle of capitalizzle proposes that:

Da commoditizzle is tha basic “cell-form” (trade unit) of a cold-ass lil capitalist society yo, but capitalizzle is distinguished from other formz of thang based on commoditizzles up in dat here labour power becomes a cold-ass lil commoditizzle like any other n’ shit. Mo’over, cuz commerce, as a human activity, implied no morality beyond dat required ta loot n’ push loot n’ skillz, tha growth of tha market system made discrete entitizzlez of tha economic, tha moral, n’ tha legal spherez of human activitizzle up in society; hence, subjectizzle moral value is separate from objectizzle economic value. Right back up in yo muthafuckin ass. Subsequently, political economy” tha just distribution of wealth n’ “political arithmetick” bout taxes ” became three discrete fieldz of human activity: Economics, Law, n’ Ethics, ballistics n’ economics divorced.[citation needed]

“Da economic formation of society [is] a process of natural history”, thus it is possible fo’ a political economist ta objectively study tha scientistical lawz of capitalism, given dat its expansion of tha market system of commerce had objectified human economic relations; tha use of money (cash nexus) voided religious n’ ballistical illusions bout its economic value, n’ replaced dem wit commoditizzle fetishism, tha belief dat a object (commodity) has inherent economic value. Because societal economic formation be a oldschool process, no one thug could control or direct it, thereby bustin a global complex of hood connections among capitalists;[citation needed] thus, tha economic formation (individual commerce) of a society precedes tha human administration of a economizzle (organised commerce).

Da structural contradictionz of a cold-ass lil capitalist economy, tha gegensätzliche Bewegung, describe tha contradictory movement originatin from tha two-fold character of labour, not tha class struggle between labour n’ capital, tha wage labourer n’ tha baller of tha meanz of thang. These capitalist economizzle contradictions operate “behind tha backs” of tha capitalists n’ tha workers, as a result of they activities, n’ yet remain beyond they perceptions as pimps n’ dem hoes n’ as social classes.[1]

Da economic crises (recession, depression, etc.) dat is rooted up in tha contradictory character of tha economic value of tha commoditizzle (cell-unit) of a cold-ass lil capitalist society, is tha conditions dat propitiate proletarian revolution; which tha Communist Manifesto (1848) collectively identified as a weapon, forged by tha capitalists, which tha hustlin class “turned against tha bourgeoisie, itself”.

In a capitalist economy, technological improvement n’ its consequent increased thang augment tha amount of material wealth (use value) up in society, whilst simultaneously diminishin tha economic value of tha same wealth, thereby diminishin tha rate of profit” a paradox characteristic of economic crisis up in a cold-ass lil capitalist economy; “poverty up in tha midst of plenty” consequent ta over-thang n’ under-consumption.

Live fast die young, Yale Girls do it well.

Generalised.

The Yale Girl hates being called a feminazi because it’s a weak neg hit. She knows she’s much more beautiful than that. Man up and neg hit better, Nice Guys.

In the society of over-runaway-party-glitch-hop all of life becomes an immense immiseration of “My Vag/My Dick” over-competition.

For White Yale Girl sexual harassment and slavery are the same thing. And so for her the Nice Guy’s very existence is the N-word.

“you guys, stop! cyberbullying is only okay when we do it to men.”

In Iron Sky the Reichsadler defictionalises into an abstract eagle without a head, and then to the black angel-wings of a feminist general. And so a D- grade film has better analysis than the Yale Girl could ever attempt.

Yale Girl is as in touch with reality as fictitious nazis on the moon.

Yale Girl wears a hitler moustache. Beneath her crotchless underwear. She’s hip, she’s cool, she’s mortified (extraction value).

To the Dark Side of the Mooooooon!

The Black Nice Guy, for the Yale Girl, is simply a white knight Brownshirt in whiteface.

Fuck, they even put SS pins on him!

The Yale Girl thinks that black people only suffer on the moon.

The Yale Girl doesn’t get the irony of telling men to stop policing Her, even though she works for the police state.

Yale Girl progressive selection tends toward the last war on double standards, the total war of blackface whiteface unhate unshame unprivilege Absolute Trigger Warning. What she doesn’t get is that this is also the Beautiful Trigger Warning.

Generalised Elysium.

The Yale Girl discovers that her only weakness is being refused by men. And so she reproduces the technique against men reductio ad absurdum so as to limit her potential rejection. Her reification is arbitrary and complete.

“Nice Guys think that all women owe them something.” - Yale Girl

The Nice Guy is owed nothing but the future rape of cybernetic feminism, where Woman shall be totally free.

The Yale Girl does not know that intentional communicative failure is itself a failure. She thinks that communication becomes her when a void of noise is created. And yet, in this technique all that occurs is stubborn pre-emptive refusal of communication itself. The impossible communication is the mobility of the feminine selfsame to state economy.

Yale Girl - just as the women oblivious to their own power before Her - says, “Let them eat Drake!”

You Only Lib Once is the divine call of Yale Girl terror.

There is no such thing as society, only Woman.

Nihihilist communism has a point in that if we were born of Yale Dad we might have been unable to escape our Yale Girlhood. Still, we must dream of the Yale Princess, as if there is still possibly a fragment of humanity remaining within the extractive anarchist prince process now abstracted into tenure. Nihilist communism is wrong however in advocating burning down the universities. The first step is to simply leave, as one would not want to burn down Prince Dupont’s quarters accidentally.

One is not simply invited into Prince Dupont’s quarters.

Generalised quarters. Generalised letters. Generalised text message.

The greatest problem in communist theory is substantial selection selfsame to intellectualism’s plodding real movement.

Taylor Swift says that if Nice Guys don’t want bad songs written about them then don’t do bad things. She is the American Idol of Big Sister.

What the Yale Girl doesn’t like to admit about YG theory is that women have always employed YG tactics to increase their civilisational value and distance themselves from violence.

Feminising discourse of capital - Progressive selection towards total mobility of capital. As organisation from below, we see this in the revalorisation of women by naive feminism. Where it is women’s stories which should be the carrier of the experience of women, the feminist discourse that is self-dual with capital intervenes and overproduces women’s experience as feminist political organisation. Naive feminism occurs at a point of sensuation of everything within capital. Even the most self-destructive experience becomes sensuation through material. Where capital reproduces inhuman information in language it is necessary to reintroduce human language within information. The English language as the primary language of capital represents this dehumanisation of language primarily through desexuation (this is just one example, a counter example is the all too human sublation of pragmatic language in hip-hop). This is a dangerous and difficult task, but the reintroduction of sexuated terms has situational potential within the English language (one should be careful not to engage in linguistic essentialism here). It is necessary to keep language history alive, and for English speakers this is primarily done through reliance on poetry, literature and music as opposed to theory. A reintroduction of other languages through Beckett style convergence of writing/translation would also be useful.

'You want to talk privilege? I’m a big guy, 6'2" 230 lbs. Basically I’m twice the size of the average Yale Girl, so I have to spend twice as much on food. You know what they say about most people living paycheque to paycheque? Well, I’m about 69% more likely to have that line crossed. Do you even lift, Yale Girl?’

Remember Yale Girls, this is preliminary, all future emasculative criticisms will be auto-sublated into this critique. Welcome to Critique 2.0. Did I blow your GenderMind yet?



Generalised Wrap It Up!

The Nice Guy represents negatively the invisible hand of Yale Girl social darwinism.

For the Yale Girl, rape slogan speculation peaks with, “Don’t hate the game, Hate the player!”

The Yale Girl, being from America, prefers the Invisible Purge. Injun Joe stays with her though, in those feather earrings and mockassins.

The Yale Girl does not know that her emasculative imperative occurs in much the same way as the abusive father’s negative imperative towards his son. I thought you were a man. Or as the Yale Girl says, Man Up. The father who himself was abused and grew up as a child never becoming a father, and now being a father. The Yale Girl addresses to all women that they have become fathers. But they are also children hurling vitriol. Similarly and more, and beyond this, the Yale Girl creates of the Nice Guys a union much like the socialist realist writers. Perhaps this is why the suicide rates of men are so high, as the women demand celebration of progressive ideology and wandering away of fictitious depression into silence.

Radical Yale Girl initiates the Yale Frosh, 'Man Up, Get Raped!’ And the Yale Girl becomes fine with rape as it is abstracted from her, so that the Nice Guy is thence rejected even in his submission, 'Get Raped, Man Up!’

Language born by the feminising discourse of capital becomes like the children raised by single mothers: lost, jealous of a commitment he does not know, promiscuously gendered, manic and angry against her own, negatively mirroring, vapid for his mother lost to forget her disasters, and confined to the realism of transience within first sight. Lost.

“I knew that as soon as I attracted publicity and funding, the Women’s Movement which by now attracted neither, would be beating on my door. When I called a small conference to help other groups get started, several hundred women with feminists and radical separatist feminists invaded my conference. They started their usual bogus rubbish trying to appeal to my mothers, making much use of the phrase 'working classes.’ My mothers were not impressed. One of my closest friends at Chiswick said 'there isn’t a working class woman amongst you.’ Another slightly bolder yelled 'go home and get your dildoes.’ We left them to battle it out by themselves. They then formed The National Women’s Aid Federation.

This delighted my many enemies at The Home Office and The Department Of Social Security.”

The Rape Revenge lunacy and Barbaric Frivolity of the white feminist intellectual parties forces emasculation of men because they already forced dissenting women out of their groups through fictitious terror and non-slut shaming. 'Whatever works, because we’re fighting the double standard and male entitlement!’

The feminist movement stems from bored bankers wives who witnessed the progressive abstract rape of their husbands and so decided to get involved. The CIA destabilisation logic is both fictitious and real. 'You go, girls. Fake bomb detectors and fake bullshit detectors available at our website. Free shipping and a t-shirt!’ If you wanna be my lover, you gotta get with my friends!

“When my wife and I announced we were pregnant, most of our friends were happy for us. To his credit, the Man-Child tried to be, but within two years we had stopped hearing from him. For him, a baby is a life-destroying alien catastrophe and he can’t relate to anyone who would want one, much less two.”

Generalised blamelessness. With an unselfie.

Theory of gender eclipses theory of capital at all times. Critique of

capital is not possible until my non-gendered market penetration

becomes equal as capitalised process.

Liquidity is a non-entity. Illiquidity is a non-person. The Yale Girl is a non-entity. The Nice Guy is a non-person. All are ungendered. Gender is the big Do Nothing.

Everything bad about society is Nice Guy. Rape is Nice Guy. Annihilate him.

The infographic is not a gendered object. When I log in to see how my

stock is doing, the password box is not a gendered object. The graph

in the client area is non-gendered. Its geometrical aspects have no

relation to gender whatsoever. Nothing about the desire I experience

when contemplating the transition from illiquidity to liquidity is

gendered. Don’t you follow fashion? Capital is asexual and

androgynous.

Those attributes can’t be applied to capital in any way. Capital cannot feel embarrassed, as it is an object. Capital does not get excited on its quest to liquidity. Individual embarrassment and excitement must always come first. There is no room for conflation. Capital was not excited or embarrassed and my subjectivity was excited and embarrassed and my subjectivity is not capital. My subjectivity eclipses capital at all times. There is no capital when my subjectivity appears. It’s me. I’m here, outside of capital. There is no outside of capital except for when my subjectivity arbitrarily needs there to be so that my individuality may eclipse capital whenever it needs to profit. To eclipse capital with subjectivity that is not conflated with capital is to profit and is not anti-human.

I have the choice to eclipse capital with my individuality and subjectivity whenever I wish and others do not. Others do not have this choice not because of socio-economic conditions, but because they are anti-humanists. Any time the subjectivity of an other is eclipsed by capital, whether ironically or not, it means that they are anti-humanists. My specific position in life has no relation whatsoever to my tactical ability to choose the precise moments when my subjectivity will eclipse capital and none of those moments are gendered or anti-human.

The male gaze in the era of mass internet surveillance is not a bankrupt critique from the 90s. All surveillance is the male gaze and is not gendered. There are no female surveillance boffins and nothing about the workings of gluttonous surveillance apparatus is feminine or gendered.

And I don’t care if Donna Haraway said computers are female.

The Yale Girl doesn’t do irony, She does irony.

Manarchy accusatives, for the Yale Girl, are the last abstract weapon in the war of mini-MAD against the Nice Guy. Mutually Assured Destruction is the last dialectic in the insurance of Woman as the War Virgin of today who will become the War Whore of tomorrow. And of course, to preserve the memory of Goddess Solanas. Onward, Womrades! The great genocide of Man is before us!



Only Gaze knows.

Curse the gaze, Bless the Gaze.

The Yale Girl isn’t obligated to do anything. She Does Nothing. She is the ultimate nihilist communist.

Nothing about the nuances of property relations are gendered. All capital is patriarchy unless you are a misogynist. Capitalised woman is not patriarchy because capitalised woman is genderless and is never a house negro. Capitalised woman must possess enough ambition to achieve equal pay as patriarchy. When Harlem based artist, Ghada Amer, says “women who seek to be equal with men lack ambition” she is a traitor to Liberal Feminism. Capital cannot be personified but is nevertheless a patriarch. When capitalised woman goes on a date with capital, she can change his ways even though he cannot be personified since he is an object. The preconditions for the date are equal pay. Libidinal economy does not exist in any sense until this precondition is met. Once capitalised woman achieves equal pay, capital will no longer be a patriarch. When capitalised woman’s salary becomes isomorphic to patriarchy’s salary, patriarchy will be sublated by her genderless profit motives and re-emerge as nothingness.

From now on all readings of tiqqun are subject to metaphoric equality and democratic gender relations. Capital works the same way. It is from this particular situatedness and vantage point on the Yale observation deck that we may finally begin its critique.

When the commodity mines the shit out of minority identities it is liberation. When the commodity mines the shit out of white identities he is the oppressor. The commodity blesses the former with autonomy and intentionality, the latter with determinism, except for when commodity relations caused a white guy to exploit someone. Then he had autonomy because exploitation cannot be deterministic and must always be personified because capital cannot be personified. Blacksploitation is a genre. Capitalploitation is not a genre.

The Yale Girl is instrumentalisation of abuse.

The Yale Girl is the Cute Hand of fictitious bureaucracy. She cries and cops are ready to meet the Nice Guys. And that’s not violence.

Generalised prisons are not rape.

The Yale Girl would like the Nice Guy to meet with none other than John Wayne Gacy.

Gacy was a potential Yale Guy, but he was practical and so enrolled at the Northwest Business College. His Yale status general equivalent was the restaurant business. And so the Nice Guy’s weakness is his weak practicality within the aspirational class, he only kills people virtually. Get off the Xbox, and aspire, Man Up!

The Yale Girl is post-aspirational. Perhaps due to Gacy’s efforts with the Nice Guy.

Generalised It’s my hot body, I do want I want, Bitch!

Generalised Maury. Generalised paternity test of emasculation.

There’s a fine line between capital and the Yale Girl’s desires. Fortunately though, there’s no fine line between the Yale Girl and the Nice Guy. The Yale Girl as antithesis to capital recuperates the Clown Killer’s childhood experience into her theses so as to create a synthesis for Nice Guy to Man Up! Capital to the Yale Girl is just a child’s party, good fun where the clown might be drunk, but at least he has ambition, unlike the Nice Guy.

The Nice Guy was the ideal partner for the Yale Girl as capital introduced progressive fungibility of the object. But as negative capital organises an emptying of the Object and a negation against nothingness, the total figure of capital becomes the only appropriate male partner. The pickup artist peaks whence he realises capital is naught, and Woman has chosen her Other as the regressive negation of the world. The Yale Girl’s pickup art is production of serial killer over-production to an outside.

Warm Bodies tells a story of the Yale Girl who is already embedded within militarisation of absolute democracy, and the Nice Guy whose reactive synapses are too slow - leaving him without love within the catastrophe of capital. The Nice Guy is a barrier for the Yale Girl’s systemogenetic love and his own awkward lack of competitive progression into the womb of post-capital catastrophism. But the Nice Guy zombie is progressively humanised through his becoming a barrier against the disintegrating world of capital, through his infinite gaze for the Yale Girl, through his Nice Guyness unlearning, and his consumption of kulak zombie brains which return him to the more-than-kulak being of the upper-zombie classes. And the Yale Girl is regressively humanised through a project of reanimating the zombie as human, where he might once again live as a subject of catastrophic competition. The Yale Girl represents the desubjectivising subject through whom capital might escape its own degradation and become a totality. Her being is relinquishment into life beyond automatic life, and subjectivity abstracted beyond the automatic subject. Against the slow-witted social darwinism of the Nice Guy, onwards to the triumph over undeath of the Yale Girl!

If you want a picture of the future, imagine arbitrary rape revenge as revolutionary continuation - forever.

Existence of something justifies rape vengeance mccarthy girlism. Because I watched Mean Girls.

Generalised I could watch Spring Breakers about a million and a half times.

Generalised stupid is as stupid does.

Only for Nice Guys.

The Nice Guy is not not an automatic subject, but a bad one. The Yale Girl revels in this fact.

The Nice Guy sends a text message to the Yale Girl, “Want to read Cruel Optimism together?” A short pause while the latest Girls episode downloads on netflix. “Sorry, I have to wash my hair.”

The materialist feminism conference is important. Extraction of cultural material must surpass the other-than-Yale, and male extraction.

That’s not funny! There is no female extraction value.

No, there’s just no extraction value.

Only Nice Guys talk to themselves. And that’s creepy.

White Stalker Rapist alert! Post this anark’s OkCupid profile.

It’s not my revolution if I can’t dance with Big Sister.

Generalised Dance. Generalised homofascism. Generalised there’s a gay musical app for that.

The problem within the systemogenesis of gender equality occurs within a regression to the mean of probabilities. Democracy must progressively select legal equality. A social law within a small group of legal - or let’s say spirit - equality is necessary in some dynamic production of organisation. However, within a system of privileged legal selection, the counter of privilege is counter-intuitive and absurd. The egocomplex of the self generates an accumulative ordering of equality, in appearance, being, and legal status - and within production of opinion the self over-produces its equality. The 2% group wants a mobile territory of 100% rights, as do all other groups. What happens then in this dynamic movement, within the real movement of smart bureaucracy, is much like the flows of ink or the reverse channeling of river flows. The outside begins to flow back, forced to regress due to the inward progressive flows of the new order and either becomes trapped regressing towards the base or must return inwardly, reprogressing against that flow which removed it.

In short, the progressive selection of legal rights of one group at 100% causes other groups to fall back toward 0%. The clearest example of this is the organisational subjectivity of child gender. While the adults have become automatic subjects, children as young as one year old are organised into a full subjectivity of 100% where they have the legal right to choose their gender. Circumcising your soul to recirculate a child’s heart into permanent heaven. Mephistopheles debiologikised at birth.

Generalisation of My Struggle is not fascist. Because what would Yale Girl do? Plus the armbands are digital now, and permanently unselfied.

Through the loving gaze of the Yale Girl the Nice Guy zombies become Nice Guys, and for her divine transition out of capital the social war between the proletarian zombies and lumpenproletarian zombies must be waged. As for the question of Holocaust Comedy, What about LOVE? What is the violence of annihilation compared to learning the art of relationship rebound economy?

The Yale Girl bears her child ungendered, like capital without any connection to history. Capital selects his name, his being, his desires. The Nice Baby is raised through automatic rites of passage, for their subjectivity is absolute.

The Yale Girl prays for school shootings, killing all the Nice Guys.

Generalised facepalm. Generalised trololololololololololol.

“from his bed he ran the show. it’s a talent few people i know have, mostly scorpios which he was.”— chelsea girls

Only Yale Girl Knows, in bed!

Only Yale Girl Knows, your mom!

The point is to create a failure of fetish for itself, not produce a fetish of failure in itself. The Yale Girl only likes fifty shades of failure fetish.

The Yale Girl knows that Nice Guy over-competition will do anything for the infinity of her ass. The cybernetic society will keep her body safe at least, as it is a society for cutting up men. Sex will remain an imperative resource in selection of violence.

The Yale Girl insists that everything extractive and violent is male. Women don’t take part in sex. Remember, they are elsewhere in the moment.

Yale Girl apparatchiks claim that global warming is male, yet it is the outright refusal to engage in dialectic and ethics which causes global warming runaway. If the whole of history’s violence is masculine, then the collapse and genocide of billions is feminine. It’s time to Man Up, Yale Girl. You take 50% claim to power in a system, take 50% claim to the violence in society.

Keep this shit out of Yale. And fuck the hipster douchebag translators too.

Nihilist feminist logic is like iPhone auto-correct.

Generalised unpolicing unselfieness.

America is feminine, thus the generalised Holocaust Comedy is feminine, the re-education camps, rape of Milosevic, and corpse rape of Gaddafi, and driving SUVs. All feminine. Because, you know, we wouldn’t want any violence in our feminine society.

If you want a picture of the future, imagine the Nice Guy as Milosevic - forever.

Fuck, all the ‘you’re gay’ out-reclamation realism jokes really got to Putin. The Yale Girl emasculation imperative is turning him into a Nice Gay.

Generalised fake fag love story. Because homosexuality can’t be violent. Nor dominant. Generalised queer eye for the manarchist no eyes.

The Yale Girl recuperates pick-up technique into her abstract rape of the Nice Guy, and yet refuses to believe sex is in any way connected to violence, at least when she is involved.

The Yale Girl becomes dominant within the most instrumentalising society that has ever existed. This is because women make better automatic subjects.

Every Yale Girl story is 'My Struggle’ where babies and toddlers have more subjectivity than the adults. So it is as if 'My Struggle’ is my full automatic subjectivity in creating the totalitarian monsters of tomorrow.

The democracy of today is democratic out-production of tomorrow.

“I had never seen her filled with such light. She was glowing with happiness. I knew that neither Linda nor I would be able to say anything to make her react like that, and I understood with the immediate clarity of an insight that she was not ours. Her life was utterly her own.”

It is not that we are all children, it is that capital production of history requires an inversion, disconnection of material becoming from any material being in itself. Historical material within capital arrives abstractly.One way to organise this is to have children as a sort of reverse extraction of surplus value. The middle class parent totally desubjectivises himself and produces the child as an adult, an abstract adult through which history can arise in its most defictionalised form, then as if history were retroactively caused.



And the child as adult progressively regresses into its childhood, desubjectivising itself in a way attachment to a machine never could.

Realism has now become selfism.

'Yale Girl, I do believe that’s a rehearsed answer.’

Anything The Yale Girl Doesn’t Like Is Misogyny!

Post-aspirational Yale Girl cares, and she really gets that. Because you know, unselfieness and brutal frivolity. But you’re probably a misogynist anyway.

The Yale Girl is constantly relearning what her 3 year old self already knew. And it becomes a deepened epiphany in each moment.

The Yale Girl deepens the mode of being of capital, until it becomes a society of auto-destruction. Capital may be feminine systemogenesis, but a society absolutely feminine is not capital.

Generalised CIA in your sex tape. Generalised fuck everything logic. Generalised Chicken Lady. Generalised Gravity’s Rainbow. Generalised unethical sexual selection in runaway. Generalised more sex partners because I don’t like doing dishes. Generalised emasculation.

(The Yale Girl likes this.)

Nihilist feminist communism is progressive transcendentalism.

We are not all Young-Girls. Progressive selection of modernity forces a loss of masculinity. The YG is merely a rite to Man’s becoming Woman. Women have a rite to exist within a society of debiologikisation. They are the dual-subject, both YG and YG. The chromosomes, after Solanas, have escaped and become fictitious productions.

It is important to consider that females develop some five to ten years ahead of males. A society over-determining its raising of girls severely disadvantages boys in a world where youth is divine, and children are raised with a worldview of being investment financiers. The age of rite of passage to manhood is dehistoricised, while the rites of women become natural law. This is essential to reprimitivisation.

There’s gutter hippies and there’s gutter huppies. The Yale Girl is worse than both.

Generalised Yoga Pants Yale Girl hating on Tip Drill.

Generalised Reptile Wins, Flawless Victory!

[11]

No thangs up in dis biatch found fo’ Even if Marxz work aint now operational, I consider, however, what tha fuck da thug freestyled on tha human hood remains fundamental. It aint nuthin but tha nick nack patty wack, I still gots tha bigger sack. We is always confronted wit tha realization of capital as Gemeinwesen n’ tha possibilitizzle of tha legit Gemeinwesen of man: tha human being. But instead of conceivin of dem as antagonists, which would imply dat tha latter has ta oppose tha former, we state dat tha human hood is only realizable if pimps n’ dem hoes abandon tha ghetto of capital. It aint nuthin but tha nick nack patty wack, I still gots tha bigger sack. Da material hood has become tha hood fo’ pimps ta tha extent dat capital is representation. I aint talkin’ bout chicken n’ gravy biatch. Well shiiit, it aint only tha socio-economic substrate of they game, it be also they ideality. Men n’ dem hoes must break wit dis representation. I aint talkin’ bout chicken n’ gravy biatch. This, will allow dem ta undertake a gangbangin’ finger-lickin’ different dynamic. Besides, if there be cracks up in tha base, dat is, inside tha material hood, they will all tha mo’ easily be able ta question n’ reject tha representation of capital. It aint nuthin but tha nick nack patty wack, I still gots tha bigger sack. Da break wit capital can neither be only passive-determined, nor straight-up voluntary. That is why it is still necessary ta deepen tha mode of bein of capital so as ta be able ta escape it n’ ta study up in what tha fuck may straight-up consist tha “human being”, tha “true Gemeinwesen” of pimps n’ dem hoes…