Many disputes occur when the agenda of Feminism is brought up. Does Feminism have an agenda? What does it aim to achieve? Has it achieved those goals? Does it still have a way to go? The main argument that most pro-Feminists will agree with is that Feminism was about equality. It aimed to correct the perceived oppression that men have directed at women in history. The theory is that men have conspired directly, or indirectly (depending on which “brand” of Feminism you align with) to keep women down, thus meaning that women have failed to reach their full potential, also meaning that men created a patriarchal society that only benefited them.







What complete and utter bull! For starters men have had more than their fair share of “oppression” to deal with in history, not least the burden of being a provider for women and children, working in jobs that women wouldn’t dream of doing, even now that they are “emancipated.” Men always have, and still do, the most arduous jobs that women wouldn’t touch with a barge pole. Women don’t work in mines, on oil rigs, fight on the front line, work as meat packers, trash collectors, and all the unclean, unsafe jobs that result in over 90% of on-the-job fatalities being men.





Men have always sacrificed their happiness so that women could be protected and provided for, while women took a husband that was deemed of worthy stock to look after a woman. While women were historically expected to look after the family and the home, they were rewarded by marrying up the social ladder, never having to worry about financial strains or social responsibility. This phenomenon is known as hypergamy , and according to evolutionary psychologists this is a result of the female inclination to seek better genes and greater resources for themselves and their children.





When Feminism began to manifest itself in the latter part of the 19th century it immediately sought to change the dynamic of hypergamy by giving women rights equal to that of men. What feminists and liberals repeatedly ignore is that the “rights” that men previously had in so-called “patriarchal societies” always came with great responsibility. In the past a woman was not responsible for her husband’s debts , and this pattern of financial unaccountability coincided with her inability to earn any money. It was the husband who was expected to handle money, and any debts were in his name. Previously women did not go to jail for financial reasons, while men were expected to look after women in the same manner as a father looking after a daughter. Is this ideal? No. But it is false to claim that men always had the upper hand in this scenario. There was a lot of pressure that came with men being responsible to the state for a family.









Some may then argue that women are buried up to their necks when they are stoned, for example in Iran, while men are buried up to their waists, able to escape death if they can dig themselves free – but do you like the odds in this situation? Does it really matter in the grand scheme of things? When we really examine the culture in the Middle East it is not directly sex based, but draconian and despotic rules that are drawn from statism and religion. If you want to fix this then you have to challenge this system, not demonise men as the sole oppressors.





But this is exactly what happened in the West. Wherever Feminism goes it is driven by the empowerment of the state and a hateful ideology that paints men as oppressive. One major goal of the state has always been the economy, and below we can hear ex-Minister for Women Harriet Harman state that women in the workplace “brings the widest pool of workers to employers":













Feminists and liberals struggle with any suggestion that the government has its own agenda in helping Feminism, though it is clear that the flooding of women into the workplace helped drive down wages. This is not the only reason wages have failed to keep up with inflation since the 70’s , but it is common sense to realise that dramatically increasing the workforce is going to create an advantage to the employer. In jobs women prefer to work in, such as offices and schools, it is harder to earn a higher wage when compared to outdoor jobs that women do not statistically want to partake in. Feminists and leftists fail to understand this, and wish to use affirmative action to destroy the productivity of the business world via an agenda akin to Marx’s “From each according to his ability, to each according to his need."





We have reached a crossroad in this gender war. It is clear that Feminism has no intention of creating a world where people are rewarded based on ability, and instead wish to create an unsustinable model of society where all are identical, denying any link to reality such as sex based differences, or practicality in a free market economy. What’s worse is that Feminism has shown itself to be a hateful disease that infects women wherever it goes. As Feminism spills over to the East it is easy to see in real-time just how the Feminist agenda creates a culture of hatred:













In India men are hit by women for boarding ladies’ train carriages, even during crowded and chaotic rush hours - this reminds me of a certain situation involving black people on buses! As if that’s not enough a law is being proposed in India for the government to pay women to beat their husbands! This is a new low, but alas there are many that have fallen prey to the state exploiting any cause to coerce the masses. Combine this with a brainwashed group that actually buys into a biased view of history, and it’s clear that the Feminist agenda is not about equality.





This is RockingMrE – over and out!