Idan Arye Posted in reply to Suliman



Permalink Reply

On Wednesday, 25 November 2015 at 10:17:02 UTC, Suliman wrote: > I think that using SDL format was big mistake. Not only I do not want to spend time in learning yet another dead config format that now use only one project -- DUB. In time when DUB used json it was not perfect, but at last it was standard and everybody can read it. > > Now when I come to code.dlang.org I can't simply do copy-past of dependence. I need go to docs page, and read how to include it. > > Also I do not see any projects that are migrate to SDL. Everybody continue to use JSON. So please, return JSON back as default, or very soon we will see that nobody do not submit packages to code.dlang.org and nobody do not use DUB for their own projects. > > Please vote about SDL config format > > If SDL will stay by default I will prefer to move to any other build system or will downgrade to old version of DUB. I think that using SDL format was big mistake. Not only I do not want to spend time in learning yet another dead config format that now use only one project -- DUB. In time when DUB used json it was not perfect, but at last it was standard and everybody can read it.Now when I come to code.dlang.org I can't simply do copy-past of dependence. I need go to docs page, and read how to include it.Also I do not see any projects that are migrate to SDL. Everybody continue to use JSON. So please, return JSON back as default, or very soon we will see that nobody do not submit packages to code.dlang.org and nobody do not use DUB for their own projects.Please vote about SDL config format http:// www.easy polls.net/ poll.html?p= 565587f4e4b 0b3955a59fb67 If SDL will stay by default I will prefer to move to any other build system or will downgrade to old version of DUB.