Australia’s “divisive right wing senator” Fraser Anning “has sparked controversy once again after blaming the terrorist attacks in Sri Lanka on ‘Islamic populations creating violence’…. The tweets mark the second time the politician has used a terror attack to comment on Islamic immigration, following similar statements made after the Christchurch mosque attacks last month.”

The Islamic jihad is very real and expansionary. The West is indeed engaged in a global defense against jihad forces, and has not helped itself in this war by adopting policies of open-door immigration. Fraser Anning is not being “divisive.” He is, however, being disobedient to Islamic supremacists who would prefer that he “shut up for the good of diversity.” These same supremacists have charged Westerners who call attention to the jihad threat with “Islamophobia” and “racism,” which has precisely the effect of enabling the jihad to advance.

Due diligence is needed to protect peaceful people in non-Muslim countries (and Muslim countries) from jihad attacks and assaults in the name of Islam. An article in The Australian entitled “The Western world should accept the need to discuss” states what should be well understood by now, that “since 9/11 there have been thousands of terrorist attacks in the name of Islam. I cannot recall ever hearing about a Presbyterian suicide bomber, or a Lutheran terrorist. So how is it possible, after the latest the attacks on Sri Lankan churches, that we get ‘experts’ puzzling about what the motive could be. A class of five-year-olds could be brought in to lecture them on logic and reason.”

In 2017, the Islamic Council of Queensland was outraged and complained to the Australian Federal Police over its use of the term “Islamic-inspired terrorism” to describe an alleged jihad plot to bomb a passenger plane. Yet the adherents of no other religion but Islam are widely calling for violence against non-believers and for the subjugation of other religions. This must be recognized. Fraser Anning continued”

‘I am WARNING that if we continue to import Muslims into our country we will have more terrorist attacks, as has been proven time and time again,’ he said. ‘Take my advice if you want to ensure the safety of your children and a future for our nation’s people. ‘Ignore it, and face death,’ he said.

It has also long been reported that the Islamic State found success in infiltrating jihadists into refugee flows to the West. Open-door immigration should not be an option considering this fact.

The Islamic State called for revenge after the New Zealand mosque attacks. Now security experts are stating that the Sri Lanka attacks “carry the hallmarks of ISIS and al Qaeda,” and that there have been similar attacks in the Middle East and South Asia. The Sri Lanka government also suspects that the local Islamic group behind the jihad massacres may have “international support.”

Although Muslims in Sri Lanka joined their fellow citizens in condemning the attack, along with Muslims in other countries as well, it should be expected that Muslim groups would make greater efforts to actively engage in the counter-jihad instead of screaming “Islamophobia” when members of free societies, including Anning, express concern about the sheer level of violence associated with Islam. Unfortunately, there is no such expectation.

“Divisive right wing senator Fraser Anning responds to Sri Lanka terror attacks which left 290 dead including two Australians by saying ‘Islamic populations create violence,'” by Brittany Chain, Daily Mail Australia, April 22, 2019: