Full text of "Christopher Jon Bjerknes The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians"

Christopher Jon Bjerknes The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians Enlarged Second Edition Copyright © 2006, 2007. All Rights Reserved Table of Contents 1 Prehistory of the 1915 Genocide. 1.1 Introduction. 1 .2 Jews, Crypto-Jews and Freemasons — The Means. 1.3 The Armenian Holocaust and the Battle of Armageddon — The Opportunity. 1 .4 From Herzl to Malcolm, Zionists Betray the Armenians. 1.5 Blotting Out the Armenian Amalekites — The Motive. 2 The Genocidal "Young Turks" Were Zionist Crypto-Jews 2.1 Introduction. 2.2 Jews Foment Wars of Extermination and Genocidal Revolutions. . . . . 2.3 Jewish Bankers Destroyed the Turkish Empire. 2.4 Talaat Pasha, Djavid Bey, Ataturk, Etc., Were Jews. 3 Rothschild, King of the Jews. 3.1 Introduction. 3.2 The Rothschild Plan to Take Palestine. 3.3 Cabalistic Jews Calling Themselves Christian Condition the British to Assist in Their Own Demise — Rothschild Makes an Open Bid to Become the Messiah. 3.4 The "British-Israel" Deceit. 3.5 For Centuries, England is Flooded with Warmongering Zionist Propaganda. 3.6 As a Good Cabalist Jew, David Hartley Conditions Christians to Welcome Martyrdom for the Sake of the Jews. 3.7 Jewish Revolutionaries and Napoleon the Messiah Emancipate the Jews 3.8 Hitler Accomplishes for the Zionists What Napoleon Could Not. 3.9 Zionists Develop a Strategy Which Culminates in the Nazis and the Holocaust as Means to Attain the "Jewish State". 4 Mordecai Manuel Noah 4.1 Introduction. . 4.2 Noah in 1818. 4.3 Noah in 1837. 4.4 Noah in 1844. Notes. Prehistory of the 1915 Genocide 4 1 Prehistory of the 1915 Genocide In conformity with the Jewish plans revealed in The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion in 1905, Jewish leaders met in Masonic lodges in Salonika, Italy, Paris and Vienna, and plotted a coup d' etat against the Sultan of Turkey Abdul Hamid II Jews and crypto-Jewish Donmeh of the Committee for Union and Progress took control of the Turkish Empire in 1909. They had several goals. Their primary objective was to establish a segregated 'Jewish State " in Palestine. They also sought to instigate World War I, to slaughter entire Christian populations, and to destroy the Turkish Empire and supplant Islamic religion and culture with a soulless and cultureless society engineered by Jewish positivists in Vienna, Paris, Italy and Salonika. "It is a well-known fact that the Salonika Committee was formed under Masonic auspices with the help of the Jews and Donmehs, or crypto- Jews of Turkey, whose headquarters are at Salonika, and whose organization took, even under Abdul Hamid, a Masonic form. Jews like Emmanuel Carasso, Salem, Sassun, Fardji, Meslah, and Donmehs or crypto- Jews, like Djavid Bey and the Baldji family, took an influential part both in the organization of the Committee and in the deliberations of its central body at Salonika. These facts, which are known to every Government in Europe, are also known throughout Turkey and the Balkans, where an increasing tendency is noticeable to saddle the Jews and Donmehs with responsibility for the sanguinary blunders which the Committee has made." — Vienna Correspondent for The London Times, "Jews and the Situation in Albania", The London Times, (11 July 1911), p. 5. 1.1 Introduction In 1908 and 1909, the Jewish led and Jewish financed "Committee for Union and Progress" (Ittihadve Terakke) overthrew the Turkish Empire. Zionist Jewish bankers had long sought to destroy the Turkish Empire, which controlled Palestine. These racist Jews sought to take Palestine from its indigenous population and turn it into a segregated "Jewish State" by expelling, or killing off, the native Palestinian population, and supplanting it with colonies of Eastern European Jews. These European Jews were largely of Khazarian, and not Judean, descent. Sir Gerard Lowther, who was Ambassador from the United Kingdom to the 5 The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians Ottoman Empire from 1908-1913, exposed this Judeo-Masonic takeover of the Ottoman Empire. He sent numerous letters to the British Foreign Office revealing the fact that the "Young Turk Revolution" was in fact a Jewish takeover led by old Jews and crypto- Jews from Salonika, most all of whom were Freemasons. Ambassador Lowther sent an especially detailed letter to the head of the British Foreign Office, Sir Charles Hardinge, on 29 May 1910, which stated, among many other revealing things, "[T]his new Freemasonry in Turkey, unlike that of England and America, is in great part secret and political, and information on the subject is only obtainable in strict confidence, while those who betray its political secrets seem to stand in fear of the hand of the Mafia. Some days ago a local Mason who divulged the signs of the craft was actually threatened with being sent before the court-martial, sitting in virtue of our state of siege. [***] [T]he Young Turkey movement in Paris was quite separate from and in great part in ignorance of the inner workings of that in Salonica. The latter town has a population of about 140,000, of whom 80,000 are Spanish Jews, and 20,000 of the sect of Sabetai [Z]evi or Crypto-Jews, who externally profess Islamism. Many of the former have in the past acquired Italian nationality and are Freemasons affiliated to Italian lodges. Nathan, the Jewish Lord Mayor of Rome, is high up in Masonry, and the Jewish Premiers Luzzati and Sonnino, and other Jewish senators and deputies, are also, it appears, Masons. [***] Emannuele Carasso, a Jewish Mason of Salonica, and now deputy for that town in the Ottoman Chamber, founded there a lodge called 'Macedonia Risorta' in connection with Italian Freemasonry. He appears to have induced the Young Turks, officers and civilians, to adopt Freemasonry with a view to exerting an impalpable Jewish influence over the new dispensation in Turkey[.] [***] The inspiration of the movement in Salonica would seem to have been mainly Jewish[.] [***] Carasso began to play a big role, including his successful capture of the Balkan Committee, and it was noticed that Jews of all colours, native and foreign, were enthusiastic supporters of the new dispensation, till, as a Turk expressed it, every Hebrew seemed to become a potential spy of the occult Committee, and people began to remark that the movement was rather a Jewish than a Turkish revolution. The Italian Government appointed a Jew and Mason called Primo Levi, who was not in the consular career, as consul-general at Salonica, and Oscar Strauss, who, together with Jacob Schiff, had influenced the American Jews in favour of Jewish immigration into Mesopotamia as opposed to other Territorialist plans and as an extended form of Sionism, was appointed American Ambassador here. [***] Carasso was one of the bearers of the message of deposition to Abdul Hamid, who was conveyed to Salonica and confined in the house of Prehistory of the 1915 Genocide 6 the Italian Jewish bankers of the Committee, while a brother of Remzi Bey was set over him as keeper. After the deposition the Jewish papers of Salonica sent up a loud cry of deliverance from 'the oppressor of Israel' who had twice turned a deaf ear to the appeals of Herzl, the Sionist leader, and who, by the imposition of the red passport, like our own Aliens Act, against Polish Jewish immigrants, and otherwise, had thwarted the realisation of the ideals of Sionism in Palestine. The ninth Sionist Congress in December 1909 at Hamburg announced that the divisions in the Jewish world between Territorialists and Sionists, 'as a miracle of the Turkish revolution' , had been healed. At the same time Javid Bey, Deputy for Salonica, an exceedingly clever and gifted Crypto-Jew and Freemason, was made Minister of Finance, while Talaat Bey, also a Freemason, became Minister of the Interior. [***] Parliament was 'ordered' to pass a very stringent Press Law, and a Salonica Crypto-Jew and Freemason was made 'Directeur du Bureau de la Presse', a post of enormous power, as its holder can suppress a paper for severe 'criticism of the new regime' (dubbed 'reaction'), or have the proprietor or editor court-martialled. A semi-inspired Ottoman telegraph agency [***] was started under the direction of a Baghdad Jew, and an all but successful attempt was made to appoint a Salonica Jewish lawyer and Mason as adviser to the Ministry of Justice. The Constantinople head branch of the Committee of Union and Progress is also run by a Salonica Crypto-Jew and Mason. Another Salonica Crypto-Jew and Freemason made determined attempts to be appointed 'Prefet', i.e. Lord Mayor, of the capital, but has not yet succeeded in his aim, though Prince Said Ha[lim] an Egyptian Freemason, has become Deputy Mayor. [***] [T]he old Ministry of Police was replaced by the 'Surete Publique' controlling the police and gendarmerie, and put in charge of a Salonica Freemason. [***] Talaat Bey, the Minister of the Interior, who is of Gipsy descent, and comes from Kirjali, in the Adrianople district, and Javid Bey, the Minister of Finance, who is a Crypto-Jew, are the official manifestations of the occult power of the Committee. They are the only members of the Cabinet who really count, and are also the apex of Freemasonry in Turkey. [***] A Turk described it as a process of 'drugging the latter with Jewish hashish' . From the foregoing or any close inspection of the Young Turkey movement in its present stage, it will appear to be principally Jewish and 'Turkish' as opposed to other Ottoman elements, e.g. Arabs, Greeks, Bulgarians, Armenians, etc. [***] It was hoped in the beginning that the Armenians, Bulgarians, Greeks and the Ottoman Jew would serve as economic props, but the Young Turk seems to have allied himself solely with the Jew, Ottoman and foreign, and to have estranged the other races. The same result has been witnessed in Hungary, where the Hungarian, who is of Turkish stock and is similarly devoid of real business 7 The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians instincts, has come under the almost exclusive economic and financial domination of the Jew. [***] [A]s Turkey happens to contain the places sacred to Israel, it is but natural that the Jew should strive to maintain a position of exclusive influence and utilize it for the furtherance of his ideals, viz, the ultimate creation of an autonomous Jewish state in Palestine or Babylonia, as explained by Israel Zangwill in his article in the 'Fortnightly Review' of April. He would kill two birds with one stone if he could obtain from the Turk unrestricted immigration of Jews into Turkey, an aim that he has been pursuing for years back, and transfer to Mesopotamia some millions of his co-religionists in bondage in Russia and Roumania. In return for 'unrestricted immigration' of foreign Jews, he has offered the Young Turk to sacrifice his mother-tongue and replace it by Turkish, and even to take over the whole of the Turkish National Debt. Dr. Nazim, one of the most influential members of the Salonica Committee and said to be of Jewish extraction, has, in company, with his fidus Achates, a certain Faik Bey Toledo, a Crypto-Jew of Salonica, visited the Paris branch of the I.C.A. (Judaeo-Colonisation Association) and has since openly advocated importing 200,000 Roumanian Jews into Macedonia and some millions of Russian Jews into Mesopotamia. [***] Doubtless, when Young Turkey with its heavy military expenditure is in need of borrowing, further pressure will be applied by the Jewish lenders. [***] For the 'Aurore' ('Shefak'), a Sionist organ started a year ago in Constantinople, is never tired of reminding its readers that the domination of Egypt, the land of the Pharaohs, who forced the Jews to build the Pyramids, is part of the future heritage of Israel. [***] Mesopotamia and Palestine are, however, only the ultimate goal of the Jews. The immediate end for which they are working is the practically exclusive economic capture of Turkey and new enterprises in that country. [***] [T]hey hold or control all the pivotal points in the machinery of the Young Turkey Government, though the Ministry of Public Works [***] is still held by an Armenian, Halajian Effendi. When his predecessor, another Armenian, was got rid of, a determined attempt was made to appoint a Jew or a Jewish nominee. [***] His position is now still shaky, and the most bitter and constant attacks on him come from a Jewish-financed paper, ' Le Jeune Turc ' , while there are rumours that his successor will be a Jew, or a Turk with a Jew at his elbow. It is obvious that the Jew, who is so vitally interested in maintaining his sole predominance in the councils of the Young Turkey, is equally interested in keeping alive the flames of discord between the Turk and his (the Jew's) possible rivals, i.e. the Armenians, Greeks, etc., while it is to be inferred that he would not be averse to the new regime increasing the national indebtedness to the Hebrew financiers. [***] The Jew hates Russia and its Government^] [***] The Jew can help the Young Turk with brains, Prehistory of the 1915 Genocide 8 business enterprise, his enormous influence in the press of Europe, and money in return for economic advantages and the eventual realisation of the ideals of Israel[.] [***] The Jew has supplied funds to the Young Turks and has thus acquired a hold on them; but in order to retain this hold he has to appear at least to approve and aid the Young Turk towards the accomplishment of 'national' dreams. Secrecy and elusive methods are essential to both. The Oriental Jew is an adept at manipulating occult forces, and political Freemasonry of the continental type has been chosen as the most effective bond and cloak to conceal the inner workings of the movement. [***] The 'Jeune Turc', which, like some other organs in the Ottoman capital, is subventioned by the Jews[.] [***] But all this is dependent on European, i.e. mainly Jewish, financiers supplying it with the sums required to keep up an army which is disproportionate to its actual state of economic development." 1 1.2 Jews, Crypto-Jews and Freemasons — The Means Paquita de Shishmareff wrote in her book Waters Flowing Eastward: The War Against the Kingship of Christ, quoting Sergei Nilus, "II — The Symbolic Snake of Judaism Protocol III opens with a reference to the Symbolic Snake of Judaism. In his Epilogue to the 1905 Edition of the [Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion] Nilus gives the following interesting account of this symbol: — According to the records of secret Jewish Zionism, Solomon and other Jewish learned men had already, in 929 B.C., thought out a theoretical scheme for the peaceful conquest of the whole universe by Zion. As the course of history unfolded, this scheme was elaborated in detail and completed by later generations of men who had been initiated into their secrets. These learned men decided by peaceful means to conquer the world for Zion with the slyness of the Symbolic Snake, whose head was to represent those who have been initiated into the plans of the Jewish administration, and the body of the Snake to represent the Jewish people — the administration was always kept secret, even from the Jewish nation itself. As this Snake penetrated into the hearts of the nations which it encountered it undermined and devoured all the non- Jewish power of these States. It is foretold that the Snake has still to finish its work, strictly adhering to the designed plan, until the course which it has to run is closed by the return of its head to Zion and until, by this means, the Snake has completed its round of Europe and has encircled it — and until, by dint of enchaining Europe, it has encompassed the whole world. This it is to accomplish by using every endeavour to subdue the 9 The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians other countries by economic conquest. The return of the head of the snake to Zion can only be accomplished after the power of all the Sovereigns of Europe has been laid low, that is to say, when by means of economic crises and wholesale destruction effected everywhere, there shall have been brought about spiritual demoralisation and moral corruption, chiefly with the assistance of Jewish women masquerading as French, Italians, etc. Their example is the surest method of encouraging licentiousness among the leaders of the nations. A map of the course of the Symbolic Snake is shown as follows: — Its first stage in Europe was in 429 B.C. in Greece, where, about the time of Pericles, the Snake first started eating into the power of that country. The second stage was in Rome in the time of Augustus, about 69 B.C. The third in Madrid in the time of Charles V, in A.D. 1552. The fourth in Paris about 1790, in the time of Louis XVI. The fifth in London from 1841 onwards (after the downfall of Napoleon). The sixth in Berlin in 1 87 1 after the Franco- Prussian war. The seventh in St. Petersburg, over which is drawn the head of the Snake under the date of 1 88 1 . All these states which the Snake traversed have had the foundations of their constitutions shaken, Germany, with its apparent power, forming no exception to the rule. In economic conditions England and Germany are spared, but only till the conquest of Russia is accomplished by the Snake, on which at present (i.e., 1 905) all its efforts are concentrated. The further course of the Snake is not shown on this map, but arrows indicate its next movement towards Moscow, Kieff and Odessa. It is now well known to us to what extent the latter cities form the centres of the militant Jewish race. Constantinople is shown as the last stage of the Snake's course before it reaches Jerusalem. (This map was drawn years before the occurrence of the 'Young Turk' — i.e., Jewish — Revolution in Turkey)." 2 An examination of the Jewish involvement in the Armenian Genocide of 1915 includes the prehistory of previous Jewish attacks on Eastern Christians, which were committed in the name of the Turkish Empire. An article entitled, "The Modern Jews", The North American Review, Volume 60, Number 127, (April, 1845), pp. 329-368, at 337-339, stated, among other things, "Since the last conquest of Constantinople, Turkish policy has inclined to tolerate the Jews; and the consequence has been a great increase of their numbers in that city. They are often bankers for the grandees, and custom, acquiring the force of law, has established them as collectors of the customs and purveyors for the seraglio. Their taxes are not greater than those paid by Prehistory of the 1915 Genocide 10 other races in a similar condition. 'The Jews,' says Judge Noah, 'are at this day the most influential persons connected with the commerce and monetary affairs of Turkey, and enjoy important privileges; but hitherto they have had no protecting influence.' 3 [***] In Syria, the Jews are in a state of real servitude, and no change of masters has bettered their condition. Mohammedans and Christians alike hate and maltreat them; and this hatred is heartily returned, as the latter find, whenever any circumstance gives their enemies a temporary advantage. When the Turkish succeeded the Egyptian troops in Damascus, a few years ago, they were stirred up by the Jews to persecute the Christians of every sect. When the Greeks rose against the Turks in 1822, the Jews eagerly joined against the Christians, especially in Constantinople; while the Greeks, in revenge, murdered all the Jews on whom they could lay their hands." An article entitled "The Jews", The Knickerbocker; or New York Monthly Magazine, Volume 53, Number 1, (January, 1859), pp. 41-51, at 50-51, wrote, "Of all Mussulmans the Egyptians doubtless regard the Jews with most aversion. In the year 1844 a young man belonging to a respectable family in Cairo, suddenly disappeared. Several of the resident Consuls, moved by the solicitations of the wretched mother, requested of the Viceroy a searching investigation into the circumstances of the case. It could only be discovered that the young man had gone to the Jews' quarter, from which no one had seen him return. He had been missed a few days before the feast of the Passover, and the terrible accusation was laid upon the Jews of having offered the blood of a human victim as a holocaust, instead of the blood of the paschal lamb. Had the Israelites not been protected by the Austrian Consul, it is probable that the infuriated and bigoted populace would have razed their quarter of the city level with the ground. Four years previous a similar event had occurred at Damascus. The Pere Thomas, a Christian priest, greatly beloved by the people, was treacherously murdered in the house of an opulent Jew named Daout-Arari. The affair created much excitement even in Europe. Two celebrated French advocates were sent to Egypt to plead the cause of the accused before Mohammed Ali, then master of Syria. The intrigues of the Austrian Consul and other secret influences brought to bear, procured, an acquittal of the accused. But during the judicial investigation, several important revelations were obtained. Seven Israelites confessed the crime, and turned Mussulmans in order to claim the clemency of the Cadis. From them it was learned that a Jewish barber had murdered the Pere Thomas in the house of Daout-Arari, and that the blood of the priest had been mixed 1 1 The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians with the unleavened bread. The same year the Jews of Rhodes were charged with a like offence. Similar accusations have been brought against the Israelites living in Germany and Hungary. The Greeks of Constantinople affirm that heretofore the Jews have been in the habit of purloining children, in order to sacrifice them as paschal lambs. This sacrilege was universally talked of and generally believed a few years ago in Pera and the Fanar, when the traditional enmity of the Jews and Greeks was at its height. During the Greek Revolution the Israelites assisted the Turks against the Hellenes; and when the venerable Greek Patriarch was hanged by the Moslems, the Jews volunteered to drag his corpse through the streets to the sea." Long before, Jews had massacred Christians in Palestine and Rome. The Jews took revenge on the Romans and persecuted Christians by burning Rome and blaming the fire on the Christians, under the directorship of Nero's crypto- Jewish wife Poppasa. 4 James Parkes wrote, "The day of a brief relief and revenge was, however, approaching. Justinian's grandiose dreams of imperial magnificence, and his passion for building — including several churches in Palestine — had heavily overstrained the empire's weak economic resources. His successors could not possibly maintain what he had so rashly conquered; and the empire fell a prey to disorder. Then occurred a repetition of the superstitious fears which had led Valerian and Diocletian to persecute the Christians, only this time the infidels who were said to be angering the Almighty were the Jews. Phocas (602-610) and his successor Heraclius (6 1 0-64 1 ) were said to have been warned that the empire was menaced by 'the circumcised', and both in consequence ordered the Jews of the empire to accept baptism. What numbers submitted we have no means of knowing. In any case their submission was probably of short duration, for in 61 1 the Persians swept through the eastern provinces, and in 614 they took Jerusalem after a siege lasting only twenty days. There is no doubt that the Persians received substantial help from the Jews of Galilee. One chronicler mentions a figure of 20,000 Jewish soldiers, another 26,000. While the actual figures are as unreliable as all ancient figures, there is no reason to question the fact that the Jews aided the Persians with all the men they could muster, and that the help they gave was considerable. Once Jerusalem was in Persian hands a terrible massacre of Christians took place, and the Jews are accused of having taken the lead in this massacre. It would not be surprising if the accusation were true, even though the fantastic stories told of Jewish revenge by Christian chroniclers are certainly exaggerated. The Jews seem to have hoped that the Persians would allow them the full Prehistory of the 1915 Genocide 12 possession of Jerusalem, and even the re-establishment of an autonomous state. But the Persian occupation was too short for such plans to develop. It lasted only fifteen years. In those fifteen years, however, changes occurred which centuries were not to repair. The country had been desolated by the Persian armies; agriculture had come to a standstill; cities were empty, while their inhabitants had fled to the mountains; churches and monasteries were in ruins, and much of Jerusalem itself was burnt. All the treasures collected in its shrines, including the 'true cross' itself, had been taken away, and the patriarch Zacharias sent with thousands of others as prisoners to Persia. It was a half empty country filled with ruins which, by a supreme effort, Heraclius managed to reoccupy in 629. Though he himself seems to have been inclined to spare the Jews for the part they had played as allies of the Persians, the clergy of Jerusalem thought only of revenge; and as bloody a massacre took place of Jews as had, previously taken place of Christians. But that — and the recovery of the 'true cross' — was all the satisfaction that the Christians got. A far more powerful enemy was approaching. In the year in which Heraclius regained Palestine, Muhammad was completing his conquest of Mecca. In 636 his followers entered the country; in 640 Caesarea surrendered and Byzantine rule was at an end." 5 The New Testament makes numerous charges of the Jewish persecution of Christians and the murder of Jesus and of Christians {Matthew 10:16-18; 21:43-45; 23:31-39; 27:25. John 7:1, 13; 8:37-40, 44-45; 10:19-38; 19:38; 20:19. Acts 1:6-7; Yl.Philippians 3 :2-3 . 1 Thessalonians 2:14-16). Jewish religious literature, including the Talmud and numerous Cabalistic works, calls for the extermination of all Christians. 6 Ben Justin Martyr alleged that Jews murdered and defamed Christians from the very beginning of the Christian movement — as did other sources, including Biblical sources. Elliott Horowitz chronicles numerous instances of Jewish violence in his book Reckless Rites: Purim and the Legacy of Jewish Violence (Jews, Christians, and Muslims from the Ancient to the Modern World), Princeton University Press, (2006). Gustaf Dalman wrote, "Since everyone has not the writings of Justin at hand, we venture to offer some important extracts from them bearing on this subject. We quote in accordance with the edition of J. C. Th. Otto, Jena, 1843: — 'The Jews regard us as foes and opponents, and kill, and torture us, if they have the power. In the lately-ended Jewish war Bar Kokh'ba, the instigator of the Jewish revolt, caused Christians alone to he dragged to terrible tortures, whenever they would not deny and revile Jesus Christ [Footnote: Apology, I. chap. 31.].' 'The Jews hate us, because we say that Christ is already come, and because 13 The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians we point out that He, as had been prophesied, was crucified by them [Footnote: Ibid. chap. 36].' — 'Therefore we pray both for you Jews and for all other men who hate us, that you place yourselves in company with us, and against those, whom His works, and the miracles now still wrought through the invoking of His Name, and His teaching, as well as the prophecies concerning Him as wholly undefiled and blameless, all unite to admonish that they should vomit forth no revilings against Jesus Christ, but believe on Him [Footnote: Dialogue with Trypho, chap. 35.].' 'The high-priests of your nation and your teachers have caused that the name of Jesus should be profaned and reviled through the whole world [Footnote: Ibid. chap. 117].' — ' Ye have killed the Just and His prophets before Him. And now ye despise those, who hope in Him and in God, the King over all and Creator of all things, who has sent Jesus; ye despise and dishonour them, as much as in you lies, in that in your synagogues ye curse those who believe in Christ. Ye only lack the power, on account of those who hold the reins of government, to treat us with violence. But as often as ye have had this power, ye have also done this [Footnote: Ibid. chap. 16].' 'In your synagogues ye curse all who have become Christians, and the same is done by the other nations, who give a practical turn to the curse, in that when any one merely acknowledges himself a Christian, they put him to death [Footnote: Dialogue with Trypho, chap. 96.].' 'Nay, ye have added thereto, that Christ taught those impious, unlawful, horrible actions, which ye disseminate as charges above all, against those who acknowledge Christ as Teacher and as the Son of God [Footnote: Ibid. chap. 108].' 'Yet revile not the Son of God, and hearken not to the Pharisees as teachers, that after prayer ye should ill-treat the King of Israel with scoffs, as they have been taught you by the rulers of the synagogue [Footnote: Ibid. chap. 137.].' — 'As far as depends on you and the rest of mankind, each Christian is driven not only from his possession, but completely out of the world: ye permit no Christian to live [Footnote: Ibid. chap. 110.].' — 'Your hand is stretched out for ill-doing. For instead of experiencing repentance for having put Christ to death, ye hate us who through Him believe on God and the Father of all things, and ye put us to death as often as ye have the power, and ye continually curse Christ and His adherents, whereas we all pray for you as in general for all men' (after the wording of Matt. v. 44; Luke vi. 27 f) [Footnote: Ibid. chap. 133.], — 'Your teachers exhort you to permit yourselves no conversation whatever with us [Footnote: Ibid. chap. 1 12.].' — 'There does not press upon other nations so heavy an offence against us and Christ as upon you, who are the originators of the preconceived evil opinion, which the nations cherish concerning Christ and us, His disciples. For since ye have attached Him the only blameless and righteous One to the Cross, ye have not only made no amends for your Prehistory of the 1915 Genocide 14 atrocious action, but at that time ye sent forth chosen men from Jerusalem, to proclaim throughout the world, that there is a new sect, namely, the Christians, arisen, which reverence no God, and to spread abroad what all who know us not maintain concerning us. It was your most earnest endeavour that bitter, dark, unjust charges should be put into circulation throughout the whole world against that sole spotless and righteous Light, which was sent from God to men [Footnote: Ibid. chap. 17.].' — 'The Jews make war against the Christians as against a foreign nation, and the Greeks {i.e. the Gentiles) persecute them; but their enemies can allege no ground of hostility [Footnote: Letter to Diognetus, chap. 5.].'" 7 The Masonic Jews of Salonika perpetrated their "Young Turk Revolution" in 1908. Soon after, the crypto-Jewish descendants of the Shabbataian-Russo sect of Salonikan Jews took advantage of their control of the Turkish Empire as an opportunity to mass murder their Armenian Christian neighbors. The atrocities these Jews perpetrated against Christians were at that time the worst genocide human beings had ever committed. Soon after the Armenian genocide, crypto-Jews committed their genocide of Slavic Christians in the Bolshevik Soviet Union and in the World Wars, followed by their genocide of their own European Jewry, which was followed by the genocide of many other Asian peoples under the guise of a "Communist World Revolution". Jewish Communism ultimately took some 100 million lives. 8 When crypto-Jewish Bolsheviks committed their atrocities in Russia, many well meaning persons around the world called upon the Jews of the Western World to denounce these Jewish atrocities against Christians. 9 The same happened when Jews and crypto-Jews committed genocide against Christians in the garb of the "Young Turks". In both instances, the warning for Western Jews to denounce the vile acts of Eastern Jews not only went largely unheeded, but Jewish leaders instead lied and ridiculed those who were trying to protect all Jews from a backlash by exposing the facts. Well intentioned people suspected that there would be a backlash against all Jews should Jews in general fail to condemn the actions of their brothers in the Turkish Empire. As would happen with the Bolshevik Revolution, leading Jews failed to heed this warning and instead stepped forward and shamelessly lied to the public and denied what their Jewish brothers had done. Jews have always had a bad reputation for producing such bald-faced liars — and in abundance. 10 The predictions of a Christian backlash against Jews were correct. Jewish Bolshevist atrocities in Russia, the Ukraine, Hungary, and elsewhere, were used to motivate the public to hate the Jews during the Nazi Holocaust of Europe's Jewry. Many claim that Great Britain and France failed to prepare for the Second World War, because they had hoped that Adolf Hitler would hold the line against the Jewish 15 The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians Bolsheviks of the Soviet Union and save Western Europe from the Jews, as the Polish Catholics had done shortly after the First World War. Even before the Jewish genocide of Armenian Christians in 1915, many persons warned Western Jews to denounce the massacres Jews were perpetrating against their Christian neighbors in the Ottoman Empire. The London Times wrote on 1 1 July 191 1, on page 5 (note especially the third section of the article under the heading, "The Salonika Committee"), "JEWS AND THE SITUATION IN ALBANI A. AN APPEAL FOR THEIR INTERVENTION. (from our own correspondent.) VIENNA, July 10. I am indebted to the editor of the Zeit for an advance copy of an important article entitled Torgut Shevket's Methods of Warfare, by a non-Albania eyewitness,' which that journal will publish to-morrow. I have reason to believe the competence of the author to be beyond question. In order to exterminate all the Catholic highland clans, comprising about 100,000 souls, says the writer, Torgut Shevket drove those whom he could not catch in his military noose over the frontier into Montenegro, and thereupon drew a strong cordon of troops from the Adriatic to Gusinje. As soon as the cordon had been formed, he caused all the peaceful Albanians who were earning a livelihood as labourers at Skutari to be expelled from the hills. Before the expulsion, Torgut Shevket had solemnly declared that only the Malissori clans properly so-called were considered as rebels. No sooner had the expelled labourers, who belonged mostly to the Shala and Slaku clans, reached their villages than the Shala clansmen were also declared to be rebels, and their supplies of food — i. e., maize, front Skutari — cut off. As the food supply in the Shala country sufficed only for a few weeks, and the inhabitants knew that after they had surrendered their weapons Togut Shevket would have them maltreated and bastinadoed, as he did last year, they replied to his demand for their arms, 'Come and take them'; and, to escape starvation, began to slaughter their flocks, which form their only capital. Thus Torgut Shevket will, in any case, have ruined some 8,000 Albanians (not 3,600 as Turkish journals pretend) and will have compelled them to emigrate. He himself triumphantly reported last week that their provisions were almost exhausted. The fight of the Shala people at Traboina on Friday was nothing but a desperate attempt to break through the Turkish cordon in order to bring back from Montenegro bread for their starving women and children. Prehistory of the 1915 Genocide 16 The Bregumatia. Yes! In comparison with the refined cruelty of Torgut Shevket's behaviour towards 16,000 pacific Malissori in the Bregumatia, or marshy littoral, his treatment of the Shala people, continues the writer, is anodyne. Nearly one-half of the highland clans have been accustomed from time immemorial to descend every autumn with their flocks and families into the Bregumatia, and to winter there; but as in June veritable clouds, not merely swarms, of mosquitoes make the littoral uninhabitable, they return to the hills early in summer. On their way down in autumn they are obliged to pass through Skutari, and at the Drin bridge, guarded by soldiers, they are made to pay a tax of 8d. per head for every sheep (worth lis. 4d.) and to give up all weapons. An insurrection among the clans in the Bregumatia being thus out of the question, and their destruction manu militari therefore unjustifiable, Torgut Shevket forbade them at the beginning of summer to return to the hills. Malaria is already raging among them, their flocks must perish from drinking the foul water of the now stagnant marshes, and Torgut Shevket is near the attainment of his object. A superior Turkish official of Skutari, Ibrahim Effendi Kjori, has declared publicly that the Ottoman Government intends to let the Malissori in the Bregumatia 'die like swine in a bog.' 'If European diplomacy does not soon bestir itself on behalf of the North Albanian Catholics,' concludes the writer, 'it will very quickly be able to boast of having by its Notes lent a hand to the murderous work of the Imperial Ottoman Generals Torgut Shevket Pasha. ' The Salonika Committee. The author, who in his indignation invokes diplomatic aid for the perishing Albanians, overlooks the circumstances which, in this instance, must render diplomatic action ineffectual or belated. Diplomatists can appeal only to the Ottoman Government, but not to the unofficial, intangible Salonika Committee, whose behests Torgut Shevket executed in his ill- treatment of the Albanians last year — ill-treatment that provoked the present revolt — and whose secret programme he is now attempting to carry out. To be efficacious influence must be brought to bear upon the Committee from quarters which the Committee will respect, or at least fear. These quarters are the honest and humanitarian Jews of England, the United States, Italy, and other countries. It is a well-known fact that the Salonika Committee was formed under Masonic auspices with the help of the Jews and Donmehs, or crypto-Jews of Turkey, whose headquarters are at Salonika, and whose organization took, even under Abdul Hamid, a Masonic form. Jews like Emmanuel Carasso, Salem, Sassun, Fardji, Meslah, and Donmehs or crypto-Jews, like Djavid Bey and the Baldji family, took an influential part both in the organization of the 17 The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians Committee and in the deliberations of its central body at Salonika. These facts, which are known to every Government in Europe, are also known throughout Turkey and the Balkans, where an increasing tendency is noticeable to saddle the Jews and Donmehs with responsibility for the sanguinary blunders which the Committee has made. To apportion responsibility justly is at present impossible. It appears unquestionable that the Jews supplied the brains for the Committee movement, and it is equally certain that, if and when the movement ends in disaster, they will be made to incur the odium for events like the Adana massacres, the beatings of Bulgarian peasants last autumn, and the present Albanian operations, which have shed so sorry a light upon the Young Turkish regime. The enlightened and humanitarian Jews in England and other countries — those who did not fear to organize Jewish committees for the purpose of combating the white slave traffic carried on chiefly by their depraved co-religionists abroad — have assuredly no notion of the situation that is developing throughout the Near East, nor of the weapons that are being put into the hands of every palliator of Pogroms. Frank and fearless inquiry would reveal to their eyes a state of things of which diplomatists and statesmen have been whispering for months past, and to which sporadic but necessarily obscure allusions have been made from time to time in the European Press. Now, in view of the position in Albania, reticence would be misplaced. There is reason to believe that a direct appeal from the humanitarian Jews of the Western world to the Jewish organizations in Turkey would do more to stay the hand of Torgut Shevket and to prevent the development of a catastrophe in the Near East than all the notes or injunctions which European diplomacy can indite and address to the Golden Horn. Reported Rising in the South. A telegram to the Neue Freie Presse reports, on the basis of Montenegrin official information, that some Tosk clans of Southern Albania have risen. Troops have been ordered thither from Alessio." It was not long before a dishonest Jewish leader stepped forward to deceive the public with outright lies in order to cover up Jewish misdeeds. This Chief Rabbi undoubtedly and mistakenly believed that he could intimidate anyone who knew the truth, with the threat of labeling them anti-Semites for daring to expose the facts. Jews have always used this tactic to chill debate, and too many Jews lack the moral integrity necessary to limit themselves to the truth. Jews are taught in the Hebrew Bible, the Jewish Talmud and in Jewish Cabalistic writings, to be loyal only to the Jewish tribe, and they are further taught that it is their "moral obligation" to deceive the Goyim (non-Jews) with knowing lies and misrepresentations, lest the Gentiles Prehistory of the 1915 Genocide 18 discover the Jewish plan to exterminate all non- Jews. Jews are taught to put Jews, not moral principles, first when dealing with Gentiles. Jews are taught that Gentiles are subhuman pagan cattle, who must be exterminated so that their Jewish God can restore "order" to World by making the Earth exclusively Jewish. The relevant Jewish religious writings which prove these facts will be quoted further on in this text. Dr. Moses Gaster, who was Chief Rabbi of the Sephardic Jewish Communities of England (many Jews of England and Turkey were Sephardic descendants of Jews who had emigrated from Spain and Portugal — Sephardic Jews consider themselves to be racially superior to Ashkenazi Jews, who descend from various sources including the Khazars) and Vice President of the Anglo-Jewish Association, immediately sent off a litany of lies in a Letter to the Editor of The London Times, which was published on 27 July 191 1, on page 5 (note that many of these lies were contradicted in an obituary for Emmanuel Carasso published in The London Times on 8 June 1934, on page 19; and by Gerard Lowther's letters to the British Foreign Office. 11 Gershom Scholem, 12 Prof. Dr. Yalcin Kucuk, 13 and others have written extensively on the involvement of the Jews in the Young Turk Revolution and other nefarious affairs. Jasper Ridley and Paul Dumont discuss the influence of Freemasonry in the Turkish Empire. 14 ), "JEWS AND THE SITUATION IN ALBANIA. TO THE EDITOR OF THE TIMES. Sir, — Messrs, Carasso, Farhi, Mazlum, and even Djavid Bey will rub their eyes with astonishment and will feel not a little indignant at the fanciful picture drawn or reproduced by your Correspondent in to-day's issue of The Times of their influence and importance in the Salonika Secret Committee, and of the share which is imputed to them in the acts of violence alleged against the Young Turks. These men are inoffensive lawyers and merchants, and would shrink at the idea of blood being shed at their instance. Your Vienna Correspondent and the diplomats who whisper and never venture to raise their voices must know better the inner organization of the Young Turks and how insignificant a part the few Jews, and the still less numerous Donmah, a mere handful, are playing in the Council of the Committee in Salonika and elsewhere. It is an insult to the Committee and there is not an atom of truth in it. The whole organization is a purely military one, and the principal civil Turkish element are men who have spent a good deal of their life in forcible exile in Western Europe during the reign of Abdul Hamid; there they have learnt the system of secret organization which has nothing whatsoever to do 19 The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians with Freemasonry except the forming of secret societies by the Committee. They have also learnt the principle of the State resting on homogeneous nationality, and forcible nationalization of different elements in the Empire. The Jews of Turkey have just as little to do with it as, perhaps, the Armenians or the Greeks, of whom a few are also in the Committee. To suggest that the unfortunate massacres of Adana, started by an Armenian butcher, as has since been verified, and the reprehensible retaliation on Bulgars by Turks, exasperated through the excesses of the Commitagees encouraged from Bulgaria, should have in the remotest degree been inspired by Jews in the Council of Salonika is as extraordinary a suggestion as was ever penned by your Correspondent, who evidently draws his information from sources to whom Jews and Freemasons are an object of equal detestation. As for the Albanians, they are a brave, noble-hearted fine people, whose word is a word, and on whose loyalty one can place implicit confidence and trust, possibly the finest race in the Balkan Peninsula. I have known the Albanians from my early youth and have loved them for their bravery and uprightness, and without boasting I may claim to have in my library perhaps more Albanian books than in any other private library outside the British Museum. The Albanians have also been caught by the same fever of nationality, and there are now various religious and political agencies at work to stir up and to mislead these poor brave people. If I remember aright, the Battle of Letters, Greek, Latin, Turkish — which means far more than lies on the surface — has once been graphically described in the columns of The Times. But Europe is being misled. The far larger number of Mahomedan and Orthodox Albanians, like Ghegs, Tosks, Miridits, &c, have not shown any sign of revolt. The Catholic Malissori, only a small fraction of the Albanian nation, have been egged on to fight, and these poor people are used as a pawn in the unavowed game played by other Powers behind the scenes. To suggest that the Jews of the Committee should have had anything to do with it, or with any violent action against Albania, is almost ludicrous. Jews have never yet been credited with acting like arrant fools, and it would be the height of folly, nay, a political crime, were the Jews to lead the Turks to European intervention and their own undoing. You may rest assured that if we Jews could do anything to influence the Turkish authorities and induce them to grant liberties to the Albanians compatible with the integrity of the Turkish Empire, we would not wait for any appeal from your Correspondent; but the appeal must go in another direction. Let those forces that are at work stay their hand and peace will soon reign in Albania. It is only bare justice to the Jews in the Committee of Salonika to repudiate with indignation the insinuations and suggestions of your Correspondent and to protest against the disingenuous way in which a scapegoat is sought in a few Prehistory of the 1915 Genocide 20 and inoffensive Jews, for the sins of others whom, for obvious reasons, one is afraid to mention. It is in complete accordance with the approved methods of medieval and modern Jew-baiting. The Jews may have given brains to the Committee, but they have not placed a sword in their hand, nor would they ever do so. I am yours obediently, M. Gaster. July 11." Jews absolutely sought "to lead the Turks to European intervention and their own undoing", because the Jews wanted to break apart the Turkish Empire and take overl the land from the Nile to the Euphrates. The Jews desperately desired a war between Christendom and Islam, and the Jews pitted these two religious communities against one another by slaughtering Christians and blaming it on the Moslems. The deceitful Rabbi surely knew that Zionist Jews had been planning to provoke a world war, starting with the tensions between Great Britain, Russia and the Turkish Empire over the trade routes passing through the Middle East and over the "Eastern Question" first involving Greece, the Balkans, etc; just as the Jews had already provoked the Crimean and Russo-Turkish Wars. This planned world war centered on a racist perspective on nationality that Jews could exploit in order to artificially generate a war between pan-Islam, the British Empire, pan-Germanism and pan- Slavism, while masking the hidden hand of pan- Judaism, which, behind the scenes, was instigating and fomenting the racist nationalism of the others. Jewish leaders hoped that they could petition for a "Jewish State" in Palestine after the disastrous war they intended to cause, by provoking other "races" of people to make like petitions for national independence and territory at a planned peace conference following the war — which war had not yet begun and which war would destroy the Empires the Jews wanted to destroy in order to make way for "racially" segregated nation states. 15 Jewish religious mythology calls upon Jews to ruin all Gentiles Kingdoms and the Jews wanted to break up the cosmopolitan and tolerant Empires which were leading to Jewish assimilation. Jews also wanted to break up the Empires so that other peoples would ask for independent nations with borders drawn along "racial" lines, which would afford the Jews an opportunity to make a like petition for the land of Palestine, after the Jews had successfully destroyed the Turkish Empire which owned this land — destroyed it financially, militarily, culturally, religiously and politically. Jewish leaders were successful in these plans, though they failed to convince large numbers of Jews to emigrate to Palestine. Jewish leaders then placed Adolf Hitler in power in the hopes that he would chase the Jews of Europe into Palestine. The London Times published the following Letter to the Editor on 19 July 1911, 21 The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians on page 5, which debunked Dr. Gaster's false assertions, "THE JEWS AND YOUNG TURKS. TO THE EDITOR OF THE TIMES. Sir, — In your much-esteemed paper of to-day's issue you publish a letter by Dr. Gaster, who strongly repudiates the allegations reported by your able Vienna Correspondent against the Jews of Salonika and their confederates the Committee of Union and Progress. I am afraid Dr. Gaster, in his fervent and natural desire to defend his co-religionists, has been led to make some misstatements. Firstly, he says that a few Greeks are in the all-powerful Committee. Could he state a single instance of a Greek being in this Committee? Secondly, he states that only the Malissori have revolted, and that the Tosks and Mirdites have not risen. Well, this is contrary to the truth. The Nirdites have risen last month, and if they keep still now it is that they have not sufficient arms, and as to the Tosks, it appears that they are quite restless, so much that the Government has despatched thither troops. The Jews of Turkey have not placed a sword in the hands of the Committee, but have placed, as Dr. Gaster says, brains — and he is perfectly right. But this is worse than a sword, for they have placed pernicious brains. It is not my purpose to shift the responsibility which lies on the shoulders of the short-sighted Committee of Union and Progress on the Jews; but there are some cases where they appear to be responsible. It is a secret de Polichinel that it is the Jews or German- Jews of Salonika who were the instigators of the stupid boycott against the Greek shipping and commerce; which boycott, although profitable to the Jews of Salonika, undoubtedly does not facilitate the Young Turkey's heavy task, because it necessarily alienated from them the sympathies of one-fifth at least of the inhabitants of the Turkish Empire. And the Turks proper have no shipping or commerce with which to replace the Greek. The pretext that it was a measure of retaliation for the Cretan question cannot be now seriously advanced. So in this case at least the brains they have given were good for the attainment of their private ends, but not for the good of the so-called Constitutional Turkey, which can only steady itself by seeking the friendship of its neighbours and adopting the policy of political decentralization. I am, Sir, your obedient servant, M. A. SYRIOTIS. Common Room, Gray's Inn, July 12." The Jewish bankers of Salonika came to their own defense and openly lied in order to cover up their involvement in the mass murder. Jews are taught to scapegoat Prehistory of the 1915 Genocide 22 others and the scapegoat is a part of Jewish religious mythology. 16 The following letter by the Jewish Salonika banker Modiano 17 appeared in The London Times on 4 August 1911, on page 11, "JE WS IN TURKE Y. TO THE EDITOR OF THE TIMES. Sir, — After Dr. Gaster of London, we also, the Israelite Community of Salonika, request permission to refute, in the columns of your esteemed journal, the utterly incorrect assertions contained in an article which appeared in The Times of the 1 1th July — an article borrowed from the Zeit by your Vienna Correspondent — and in a letter from Mr. A. Syriotis, published by you on the 19th inst. These documents constitute a formal act of accusation against the Jews and the Young Turks. We have no authority to speak in the name of the Committee of Union and Progress, which is the sole judge of its own actions; it is no business of ours to defend it against the accusations put forward by your Correspondent. But what we an boldly affirm is that the Committee, which is composed of the heroes who have given to Turkey Liberty and the Constitution, of persons devoted to the country, of enlightened and intelligent men, of noble hearts, has no need of Jewish heads or of Jewish intelligence. It is an additional insult to the Committee to suppose it incapable of thinking and acting for itself. Of the five Israelites incriminated by your Correspondent as principal leaders, directing heads, of the Committee, one, Mr. Salem, being of foreign nationality, never could have been a member. Among the four others, the deputies Emmanuel Carasso, Mazliah, Faraggi, and Sasson, some have been, and perhaps may still be, members of the Committee of Union and Progress; but not one of them, so far as we know, is a member of the Salonika Central Committee. Even if they were, their presence in the midst of a group of high- class people would not necessarily imply their participation in the management of affairs. Besides, even if such were the case, these gentlemen are too honourably known for the legend, created from beginning to end by their detractors, to gain credence in this country. The accusation brought against the Jews of playing a preponderating and sinister part in the affairs of Turkey is therefore a pure invention, a base calumny. And to seek to attribute to the Jews and Deunmes any influence whatsoever on the policy of this country is simply an attempt to sow discord among the different elements which compose the population of the Ottoman Empire. Again, were your Correspondents not bound, by the most elementary honesty, to verify these grave accusations before publicly formulating them? If their authors, instead of insinuating that statesmen and diplomatists hold 23 The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians whispered conversations on the meddling of the Jews in Turkish policy, had taken the precaution to make inquiries of the Salonika Consulates or of the Constantinople embassies, they would certainly have been spared the annoyance of finding themselves ranked among the number of 'those who extenuate or excuse the pogroms. ' But it is crying in the wilderness to reason with irreconcilable adversaries like the contributor to the Zeit and Mr. A. Syriotis, who reproach the Jews with the massacres of Adana, the suppression of the Bulgarian insurrection, the present situation in Albania, and, better still, the boycotting of Greek merchandise. We indignantly protest against the calumnious imputations thus laid to the charge of our co-religionists and we ask Mr. A. Syriotis to show in what respect this boycott has been profitable to the Jews of Salonika. Has he ever heard of Jewish steamship companies or of Jewish shipowners whose existence might explain the interest they would have had in getting up the boycott? Is he unaware of the fact that the Jews of Salonika are for the most part traders and that, far from fomenting trouble, they wish, were it only for the sake of their commerce, to see peace reigning in the country? Once more, we cannot convert the sworn enemies of Israel; if we have taken the trouble to call attention to their prejudiced allegations, we have done so, in the first place, out of regard for justice and truth, and, in the second place, for the honour and good name of The Times. Thanking you in anticipation for the hospitality which we feel sure you will extend to this letter, We are, Sir, THE ISRAELITE COMMUNITY OF SALONIKA, (For the Community, The President, S. D. Modiano.) Salonika, July 28." Note that, just as today anyone who criticizes any Jew or accuses the nation of Israel of anything is apt to be accused of causing the Holocaust of European Jews, the Jewish banker Modiano laid the guilt of the pogroms on Syriotis for daring to reveal the Jewish role in the intrigues of the time. Jews have always attempted to silence their critics with the charge of anti-Semitism. This cowardly and corrupt practice predates the Nazi Holocaust by thousands of years. 18 The sophistry of Modiano's letter was typical of the type of lies Jews often told to defend their interests. It did not matter to them if their lies were transparent to anyone familiar with fundamental logical principles and the facts of the matter at hand, because such persons already knew the truth and were not likely to be persuaded by lies in any event. Rather, the sophistry of these Jewish liars was meant to appeal to those who were uninformed and not overly bright — to the masses who Prehistory of the 1915 Genocide 24 could easily be won over with falsehoods and sophistry. These Jewish dissimulators depended upon the fact that their control of the press would enable them to effectively silence those who would expose their lies and illogic. A few letters to the editor by well intentioned dissenters cannot overcome the force of the Jewish controlled book publishing industry, which power also includes most venues of book review; Jewish controlled academia, which is noteworthy for its lack of integrity having long been subject to the censure of the Church and the influence of corrupt Cabalistic Jews, and which also hides behind the Jewish control of the press; and the ability world Jewry has to spread lies, smears and rumors around the globe through numerous venues from comedians, to journalists, to authors, to political advisors, to bankers, to the man on the street. Jewish bankers like the Modianos had the power to shut down whole empires, and they used it to terrible effect. Syriotis responded to Modiano in The London Times on 25 August 1 9 1 1 , on page 3, "THE JEWS AND YOUNG TURKS. TO THE EDITOR OF THE TIMES. Sir, — In The Times of the 4 th inst. you published a letter from the 'Israelite Community of Salonika,' in which they strongly protest against your Vienna Correspondent, the editor of the Zeit, and myself for the statements I made in my letter which you were good enough to publish in your much-esteemed paper of July 19 last. As I do not want to trespass on you valuable space, I shall deal very briefly with the points they raise, and restrict myself to the part concerning me personally. I believe the 'Israelite Community of Salonika' took great offence at my specific charge, which they rightly qualify as a 'formal act of accusation against the Jews and Young Turks, ' because I have touched la corde sensible. But, instead of adducing any evidence to rebut my statement and corroborate their undefendable case, they ask me sophistical questions and betake themselves to personal abuse, and refer to me as a 'sworn enemy of Israel,' a ' calumniator, ' and 'one of those who extenuate or excuse the pogroms. ' Are all the writers who have contributed in the present discussion, and all those who have written on the subject in the same sense with us, also 'sworn enemies of Israel' and 'irreconcilable adversaries'? I believe, Sir, that your readers would rather think that they are sworn friends of truth, and truth alone. They say: — (1) It is a base calumny to assert that the Jews in Turkey have given any brains to Young Turkey. This is absolutely false; and I refer the 'Israelite Community of Salonika' to the letter of your Constantinople Correspondent 25 The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians (pp. 4, 5), which you published in The Times of the 9th inst, the contents of which I heartily endorse. So on this simple point they are found out making a gross misstatement of facts. (2) They ask me to show 'in what respect this boycott has been profitable to the Jews of Salonika.' This question is quite characteristic. They also ask me if I am 'unaware of the fact that the Jews of Salonika are for the most part traders.' I shall answer these two questions together, for they are related as cause and effect. I am not unaware of this fact, and that is why I asserted that the Jews or German Jews and Donmehs of Salonika instigated the boycott against Greek trade and shipping, for they had every interest auri sacra fames to ruin their chiefest competitors, as they only could replace the ruined Greeks. Salonika, where the commerce is greater and the Jews more numerous than in any other town of the Greek Archipelago, would naturally profit by this more than any other place. And again I venture to affirm, and I speak advisedly, when I say that the Governments of all the European Powers have received reports from their Diplomatic and Consular Agents in Turkey assuring them that the boycott against Greek commerce was mainly engineered and directed by those Jewish traders who encounter the competition of Greek commercial genius as the one adversary whom they fail by other means to overcome in the Levant. I need not insist upon the fact that, apart from the difficulty of tracing the actual parties benefiting, owing to the complexity of commercial interests, in such cases it is next to impossible to cite particular names, but everybody in the Near East and the Turks themselves admit the fact. As I said in my previous letter, it is a secret de Polichinelle. But even if they did not profit to the extent they anticipated, this is not to be attributed to the want of desire on the part of the Jews of Salonika, but merely to the Greeks themselves. (3) They ask me also if I 'ever heard of Jewish steamship companies and Jewish shipowners.' This question is not only childish, but wide of the mark, and is begging the question. Nevertheless, the sweeping denial is far from tenable. Lloyd's Register will give you the names of Jewish shipowners, and I can say that it is a fact that since that insensate boycott started many steamers were bought for Turkey, the purchasers being mostly Jews or Crypto-Jews. The 'Israelite Community of Salonika' must really have a poor opinion of other people's mental faculties to put such a question. I am loth, Sir, of abusing so much of your kind hospitality, but as the 'Israelite Community of Salonika' has challenged the truth of my statements, I had no other course open to me but to make this brief rejoinder, and answer by facts, not questions, their sophistical arguments and show what is their Prehistory of the 1915 Genocide 26 'regard to justice and truth.' Thanking you in anticipation, I remain, Sir, your obedient servant, M. A. SYRIOTIS. Common Room, Gray's Inn, Aug. 21." The Chief Rabbi Gaster's blatant lies were easily refuted. The Rabbi's attempt to silence the truth with the shrill cry of "Jew-baiting" failed. The Times ' Vienna Correspondent responded with a Letter to the Editor, which was published in The London Times on 27 July 191 1, on page 5, "JEWS AND THE SITUATION IN ALBANIA. TO THE EDITOR OF THE TIMES. Sir, — May I ask for space briefly to dissect the main misstatements contained in the letter addressed to you in regard to my despatch of the 1 1th inst. by Dr. Moses Gaster, the Haham or Chief Rabbi of the Sephardic Jewish Communities of England and Vice-President of the Anglo-Jewish Association? 1 . Dr. Gaster describes the Salonika Committee Jews and Donmehs, like Emmanuel Carasso and Djavid Bey, as 'inoffensive lawyers and merchants,' but does not explain in what mercantile capacity Carasso joined the Committee Commission (which consisted, if I remember rightly, of only three or four individuals) that deposed Abdul Hamid; nor in what legal capacity Djavid Bey became Minister of Finance as a Committee nominee. As Dr. Gaster well knows, these men are influential politicians and, as such, bear their part of responsibility for the doings of the political organization with which they are prominently associated. 2. Since Dr. Gaster admits that a 'few Jews and the still less numerous Donmeh, a mere handful, ' are playing a part ' in the Council of the Committee at Salonika and elsewhere,' what ground has he to declare offhand that the suggestion that they may be playing an important part is 'an insult to the Committee' in which 'there is not an atom of truth'? Can he truthfully deny that the principal Salonika Lodge of 'Macedonia,' of which Emmanuel Carasso was in 1907-8, and maybe still is, master, was one of the two earliest, if not the earliest, meeting place of the Committee and that the members of the Committee met there as Masons? Is it or is it not the case that in Masonic and cognate secret organizations, the greatest influence is wielded by a 'mere handful of men' holding high rank? Should Dr. Gaster deny either the important part played by Jews in Salonika Freemasonry or the intimate 27 The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians connexion between the Salonika Lodges and the Committee, evidence can be adduced from official Masonic publications to confute him. 3. This being the case I confess inability to understand Dr. Gaster's statement that the 'system of secret organization' adopted by the Young Turks 'has nothing whatever to do with Freemasonry except the forming of secret societies by the Committee.' 4. 'The principle of the State resting on homogeneous nationality, and forcible nationalization of different elements,' which Dr. Gaster declares the Young Turks to have learned in 'Western Europe,' might have been better studied by them in Eastern Prussia, Russia, and Hungary. In neither of these countries has its application been attended by such success as to justify its adoption by the far less homogeneous Turkey. In Hungary, where its application receives, unfortunately, the support of the overwhelmingly Jewish Press and of many Jewish Freemasons, professors, and politicians, striking analogies to the blunders of the Salonika Committee might be found. 5. Such assurances as that the 'unfortunate massacres of Adana' were ' started by an Armenian butcher, as has since been verified, ' might have been left by Dr. Gaster to Turkish official apologists. Impartial Anglo-Saxon philanthropists, who detest neither Jews nor Freemasons, have verified on the spot, to their own astonishment, evidence to the effect that the massacres were prepared by the local Committee Press, tolerated by the Young Turkish authorities, and carried out in part with the help of troops sent from Salonika. The 'Armenian butcher' theory bears a family resemblance to Torgut Shevket's theory that the absent Malissori wrecked their own churches and burnt their own houses. Dr. Gaster may rest assured that the full truth about the Adana massacres and their object will one day be revealed. 6. Dr. Gaster's many Albanian books might at least have taught him not to classify the Mirdites, the strongest Albanian Catholic clan, among the 'Mahomedan and Orthodox Albanians'; and not to speak of the Ghegs and Tosks — i. e. the Northern and Southern Albanians in general — as though they were like the Mirdites and the Klementi, Hoti, &c, clans by themselves. And if, as he says, no Ghegs (Northerners) nor Tosks (Southerners) have shown 'any sign of revolt,' how does he explain away last year's revolt among the Musulman Ghegs of the North-East, the present revolt among the Catholic and Musulman Ghegs of the North- West, and the incipient revolt among the Musulman and Orthodox Tosks of the South? 7. In referring to the 'unavowed game' played behind the scenes by 'other Powers' whom he believes to have egged on the Catholic Malissori to fight, does Dr. Gaster mean to suggest that these 'other Powers' induced the Young Turks to cause the revolt by burning the homes and inflicting the bastinado upon the Musulman and Catholic Malissori after they had submitted and Prehistory of the 1915 Genocide 28 received an official promise of 'justice and clemency'? Or does he merely mean that 'other Powers' are striving to profit by the sanguinary blunders which the Ottoman authorities have made under the influence of the Salonika Committee? 8 . 'Jews, ' writes Dr. Gaster, 'have never yet been credited with acting like arrant fools, and it would be the height of folly, nay, a political crime, were the Jews to lead the Turks to European intervention and to their own undoing.' Yet the fact is that the Committee, in which Jews and Donmehs have from the first held influential positions and from whose misdeeds they have never dissociated themselves, has, by its Albanian policy, led the Turks to the verge of European intervention. My own Jewish friends, who are many both among the Sephardim and the Askhenazim, recognize among the chief failings of their race a tendency to what I may perhaps term 'brainglory,' that is, a certain Oriental pride of intellect that forgets to take account of the interests and intelligence of others. Some such failing seems now to be noticeable among the Jews and Donmehs of Turkey and to be blinding them to the perils to which they are exposing themselves and Jewish communities elsewhere. What those perils are may be judged from incendiary appeals like the following, which a Salonika Musulman recently addressed to his fellow Moslems, and which was published here by the Conservative Vaterland on June 13 last: — Oh! Ye Moslims! Have ye heard, since the Constitution was introduced, that any Jew has complained as the other peoples of Turkey complain? The Turks, the Armenians, the Bulgars, the Arabs, the Albanians, the Greeks — all feel themselves gripped as in a deadly embrace. The Patriarch of Armenia, the Bulgarian Exarch, the Greek Patriarch complain, and even the Sheikh-ul-Islam, who as a true Turk plaintively uttered a few truths, was deprived of his office. Why has the Arch- Haham, the Chief Jew, no cause to complain? What has befallen you that ye are so blind when even the darkest peoples of the Sudan are awakening? Why give ye ear to them of the Itahat ve Fereki (Committee for Union and Progress) in Salonika? Are they true Moslims who work for you or Pan-Islam? Since they put the Constitution before you, rising has followed rising, Moslim has raged against Moslim, while the Jew has looked on with folded arms. The journals of Europe set Jewish wisdom before their readers when they gossip of Progress in Turkey. How indeed could their Jewish writers work against the plan of their race-brethren at Salonika — to eat away the power of the Turkish Empire and on its ruins to erect a new Zion! The state of mind which such language represents is, to my knowledge, widespread in the Near East. Hence my attempt to direct the attention of the enlightened and humanitarian Jews of England and the West to the danger it involves. Dr. Gaster denounces my effort as being 'in complete accordance with the approved methods of medieval and modern Jew-baiting, ' Quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat! [Those whom God wishes to destroy, He first 29 The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians renders insane!] I am, Sir, YOUR VIENNA CORRESPONDENT." A somewhat similar series of exchanges would later take place when numerous persons attempted to warn Jews in England that they should disassociate themselves from the Bolsheviks. Yet again Jewish liars stepped forward and led their flock toward the Holocaust, a holocaust against which they were specifically warned. 19 Today, disloyal and treasonous Jews known as "neo-Conservatives" are destroying America. There is likely to be a backlash against them for their treachery and treason. Few Jews heed the warnings that this backlash is almost inevitable, and that racist Jewish leaders want it to happen in the hopes that it will force more Jews to move to Israel against their will. Not one to have his lies so easily dismissed, the Rabbi responded and indulged himself with another lying Letter to the Editor of The London Times, which was published on 1 August 191 1, on page 11, "JEWS AND THE SITUATION IN ALBANIA. TO THE EDITOR OF THE TIMES. Sir, — May I in fairness crave the indulgence of a few lines to reply to your Vienna Correspondent, who does not adduce one single statement whereby to weaken the accuracy of the facts mentioned by me in my last letter under the above heading? I will not follow him seriatim. No one denied that Messrs. Carasso and Djavid Bey were members of the Committee, but that does not mean that these two men wield any perceptible influence over that Committee, which consists of a far larger number than believed by your Correspondent. No one denied furthermore that at the beginning some of the members of the Young Turks Committee may have found it advisable to meet in a Masonic Lodge, but that does not mean that the Committee consists of Freemasons, and that their work is carried out in the name of Freemasonry. As I stated, they borrowed merely the form and established secret organizations for their propaganda. It is immaterial how far West some of the Young Turks have gone to learn the lesson of forcible nationalization, whether they learned it in Germany, or in Austria, or in Hungary; it may be a mistaken policy, which no doubt it is, but it has nothing to do with the Jews. Neither Messrs. Carasso, Djavid Bey, Muzlum, nor any other Jewish member is known to have lived in the West for any length of time to learn the new principle of homogeneous nationality; as Jews they could not even be a party to it, as it would destroy their own nationality. Prehistory of the 1915 Genocide 3 As for the Albanians, the forcible disarmament a year or two ago, together with the introduction of a new system of administration and taxation, has caused no doubt great dissatisfaction and local ebullition among all the Albanians. But they have easily been put down. The indiscretion of the Hungarian Deputy underlined by the Novoe Vremya has told the world who it was that armed the Malissori, and the curious neutrality of Montenegro, which instead of disarming rebels crossing the frontier puts weapons in the hands of unarmed refugees and allowed them to fight the Turks from behind the border, shows what forces are at work. The poor Malissori, who knows nothing of European guarantees, does not understand in his honesty and simplicity how he can give up to the Turks arms which belong to the King of Montenegro, and your Correspondent still shifts responsibility on Jewish shoulders, forsooth. As for the massacres in Adana, the facts related to me by people on the spot who have no political axes to grind are briefly as follows: After the abdication of Abdul Hamid an armed butcher refused to allow in the Armenian Church the prayer for the new Sultan to be read, and insisted that the name of the Armenian Patriarch should be substituted for that of the Sultan. A great hubbub ensued; the police were called in to quell the disorder. When leaving the Church the Armenian shot down two police at the very door, and of course was in turn shot down himself. This was the spark which set on fire the inflammable material gathered in Adana. The reports of the foreign representatives may be good for Blue Books, and even your own Correspondent does not seem to believe in them. I sincerely trust that the whole truth will, as he states, be one day made known. The circular of the 'Musulman' reproduced from the Vater land will not frighten even babies. One has seen and read similar articles in a Turkish paper whose editor has also gone to the same school of journalism for his education as the correspondents of a certain section of the European Press. May I ask whether before the advent of the Young Turks such a thing as a 'Red Sultan' existed, whether Europe has not been horrified from time to time in years gone by, by massacres in Armenia on a large scale and Bulgarian atrocities which shocked the conscience of Europe? Had Jews anything to do with them? And why should they be now charged with oppressions and acts insignificant compared to the scale on which atrocities were then committed? Why, if the Jews really have any influence, how is it that the Jews are even now not allowed free entrance in Palestine? The red ticket has not been abolished, and difficulties are placed in the way of larger colonization of Jews in any part of the Turkish Empire. Your Correspondent's contributions are not calculated to bring peace to the Albanians or create concord among the various nationalities in Turkey. 3 1 The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians I am, yours obediently. July 27 M. GASTER." Note the Chief Rabbi's line, "Neither Messrs. Carasso, Djavid Bey, Muzlum, nor any other Jewish member is known to have lived in the West for any length of time to learn the new principle of homogeneous nationality; as Jews they could not even be a party to it, as it would destroy their own nationality." The Rabbi reveals that he was a segregationist and believed that Jews formed their own nation wherever they happened to live. He contradicts himself, however, because Jews were very much involved in the idea that the empires must be broken up in order for segregated racist nations to form, in order for the "Jewish State" to form in Palestine, and the Jews perpetually forced minorities to take reactionary measures which led to infighting, dissent and the destruction of the cosmopolitan Empires in which the Jews were disappearing through assimilation. In the same issue of The London Times, on 1 August 1911, on page 11 immediately below Gaster ' s dishonest response to the Times ' Vienna Correspondent, a Letter to the Editor from George Frederick Abbott (author of several philo-Semitic books about Jews and the Turkish Empire) appeared, "TO THE EDITOR OF THE TIMES. Sir, — When, a fortnight ago, the letter from Dr. Gaster, denouncing your Vienna Correspondent, appeared in your columns I felt strongly tempted to write and point out the unfairness and confusion of thought — based upon a remarkably inadequate knowledge of the subject — which it revealed. But I resisted the temptation, reflecting that your Vienna Correspondent was quite capable a defending himself. I am very glad to see from his admirable letter in your issue of to-day that my confidence was not misplaced. Nevertheless, as a diligent student of Turkish politics and also as a recognized friend of the Jews, I beg leave to endorse, from personal knowledge, the absolute correctness of every one of your Correspondent's statements and to associate myself with him in the grave and timely warning which he addresses to the Jews of Turkey, in the first instance, and to their co-religionists in the West, in the second. There cannot be the slightest doubt in my mind that the Jews of Salonika, actuated partly by political 'swollen head,' partly by hatred of the Eastern Christians, and partly by a shortsighted appreciation of their own interests in the commercial struggle which they carry on with them, have done their worst to encourage, if not to inspire, the most rabid among the Young Turk Nationalists in the blind and blood-thirsty policy which is now yielding its first fruits in Albania, and which will yield more and bitterer fruit to-morrow in Macedonia and elsewhere. I am, Sir, yours faithfully, Prehistory of the 1915 Genocide 32 G. F. Abbott. Royal Societies Club, St. James 's-street, S.W., July 27." H. Charles Woods wrote in defense of the Vienna Correspondent in a Letter to the Editor which was published in The London Times on 3 August 191 1, on page 4, "THE AD ANA MASS ACRES. TO THE EDITOR OF THE TIMES. Sir, — As a reader of your Vienna Correspondent's letter which appeared in your issue of July 27 and which deals with the misstatements contained in Dr. Gaster's letter upon the situation in Turkey, will you allow me space briefly to add my testimony in support of your Correspondent's statements concerning the Adana massacres. I visited the Cilician Plain a few months after the awful outbreak in that district. As a traveller who detests neither Jews nor Freemasons I feel absolutely convinced that the massacres were tolerated, if not actually furthered, by Djevad Bey and by Mustafa Remsi Pasha, who were respectively the Governor-General and the Military Commander-in-Chief of the Adana Vilayet under the Young Turk Central Government at the time of the massacres. Neither of these officials received that punishment which was merited by their acts of omission, if not actually of commission. Again, Ihsan Tikri, the editor and proprietor of the Iktidal newspaper, published at Adana, for some 'mysterious' reason was only sentenced to be exiled from Adana for two years — I believe to Baghdad. When this man escaped from exile he was not even punished for so doing. Without entering further into details I am convinced that your Correspondent is right in saying that the Salonika troops, who arrived from Roumelia between the two massacres, actually took part in the second slaughter at Adana. At Tarsus, too, the leader of the mob which seized rifles and ammunition from the Government barracks on Friday, April 15, 1909, was a well-known Young Turk, at that time said actually to be an important member of the local Committee of Union and Progress. I am, Sir, yours faithfully, H. CHARLES WOODS. Royal Societies Club, S. W., July 29." The Vienna Correspondent published the following rejoinder in The London Times on 8 August 191 1, on page 5, 33 The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians "JEWS AND THE SITUATION IN ALBAN IA. A REJOINDER. TO THE EDITOR OF THE TIMES. Sir, — The letter published on August 1 from Mr. G. F. Abbott, the philosemitic author of 'Israel in Europe,' almost relieves me of any obligation to make further rejoinder to the effusions of Dr. Moses Gaster. Unlike Dr. Gaster, Mr. Abbott writes with knowledge. His endorsement of my statements and his recognition that the warning I ventured to address to the Jews of the West was 'grave and timely' constitute in themselves a sufficient vindication of my action. Yet, though no facts I can bring forward are likely to shake Dr. Gastor's flamboyant confidence in his own misstatements, chronology has a modest claim to consideration. In regard to the Adana massacres Dr. Gastes is informed that 'after the abdication of Abdul Hamid, an armed butcher refused to allow in the Armenian church the prayer for the new Sultan to be read and insisted that the name of the Armenian Patriarch should be substituted for that of the Sultan. A great hubbub ensued; the police were called in to quell the disorder. When leaving the church the Armenian shot down two police at the very door, and of course was in turn shot down himself. This was the spark which set on fire the inflammable material gathered in Adana. ' Now, Sir, it is a fact that the general massacre began at Adana not later than April 14, 1909, and earlier in some other Cilician centres, whereas Abdul Hamid was only dethroned and the new Sultan proclaimed on April 28 ! Would Dr. Gaster have us admit the argument ante hoc, ergo propter hoc as a new dialectical principle? Before the deposition of Abdul Hamid the Committee troops sent from Europe to 'restore order' at Adana were busily engaged in perpetrating the second series of massacres (April 25-27). Dr. Gaster asks whether such a thing as a 'Red Sultan' did not exist before the advent of the Young Turks, and whether Europe has not been horrified in years gone by by massacres of Armenians on a large scale. 'Had Jews anything to do with them?' he inquires further. A 'Red Sultan' certainly existed and his record in procuring assassination and massacre was unique in modern history until it was equalled if not surpassed by the Young Turks. Many Turkish critics of the Salonika Committee are, to my knowledge, convinced that one of the objects of the Adana massacres — the ground for which, be it remembered, was prepared by the agitation of Ihsan Fikri, editor of the local Committee organ Itidal — which were tolerated by the Young Turkish Vali, was precisely to exploit European detestation of the 'Red Sultan's' methods in order to facilitate his dethronement for presumptive Prehistory of the 1915 Genocide 34 complicity in the massacres. The so-called 'Counter-Revolution' at Constantinople (April 13) interfered, however, with this alleged calculation and provided another pretext for the dethronement. Ihsan Fikri was subsequently 'punished' by exile, but went to Egypt where, if I am rightly informed, he made an indiscreet speech incriminating the Salonika Committee. Thence he had the hardihood to return to Constantinople, knowing that the Young Turkish authorities would not venture to arrest him. Although an 'exile' en rupture de ban, he demanded and obtained an interview with the Minister of the Interior and was instructed to take up his residence at Konia — where he 'died suddenly' shortly after arrival! Whether Jews had anything to do with previous massacres under Abdul Hamid I am unable to say from personal knowledge or inquiry. But Dr. Gaster's first letter to The Times brought me, from a well-informed Protestant Englishman who has lived for several years in Turkey, a letter from which I quote the following passage : — There is nothing antecedently improbable in the idea that Jews should have helped Moslems to oppress or slaughter Christian competitors — e. g., the participation of the Jews of Damascus in the massacre of 1 861, and the marking of Armenian houses at the time of the Constantinople massacres in 1896 by the Jews of Haskeui, many of whom helped the Kurds, Turks, &c, to loot. Dr. Gaster does not appear to know that nothing ever has been 'verified' as to what 'started' the massacre of Armenians at Adana. A Parliamentary Commission composed of Agop Bey, an Armenian M. P., and of Yusuf Kemal, a Turkish Deputy, went to Adana to investigate the affair. Their report was never published. Agop died very suddenly on August 1, the day after he had arrived at Constantinople. Yusuf Kemal, a lawyer of some standing, sought and obtained leave to resign his Deputyship; he then went to France to study law, and since then has not returned. In consequence of the receipt of the (unpublished) official report, the Government proclaimed the innocence of the Armenians. Who then committed the massacre of April 25-27? Had proofs of Abdul Hamids complicity been discovered does any one suppose that the Ottoman Chamber would not have advertised the fact? Again, does Dr. Gaster know that there are good reasons for believing that strong pressure was brought to bear on the Ottoman Government by members, Moslem and Jewish, of the Committee with the object of settling Russian Jews at Adana after the massacres, and that rumour ascribed the failure of this scheme, which would have proved the ruin of many Armenian widows and orphans deprived of their title-deeds, to objections on the part of the British Embassy? There is reason to believe (adds my correspondent) that this is the cause of the bitter hostility shown towards the British Embassy at Constantinople by Jewish journalists in Turkey and elsewhere, including London. If the Jews really have any influence, asks Dr. Gaster, 'how is it that the Jews are even now not allowed free entrance in Palestine? The red ticket has not been abolished, and difficulties are placed in the way of larger 35 The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians colonization of Jews in any part of the Turkish Empire.' In writing thus Dr. Gaster really presumes too far upon the ignorance of the British public. Careful readers even of British reports of Turkish Parliamentary proceedings are aware that the unrestricted entrance of Jews into Palestine is one of the points on which the Committee has had to be most careful not to challenge too openly Moslem feeling; and that the revolt of Moslem feeling against the schemes attributed to cosmopolitan capitalists for the colonization by Jews of parts of the Turkish Empire was one of the chief elements in the movement of opinion that caused the fall of Djavid Bey from power. This revolt is spreading, and the state of mind which inspires it was drastically revealed in the Musulman appeal against the Jews, quoted from the Vaterland in my first reply to Dr. Gaster. Dr. Gaster, who now lives in England, contemptuously declares that this appeal 'will not frighten even babies.' Did he know from how influential a Musulman quarter it really proceeded he would perhaps feel some anxiety regarding the position of his co-religionists who have remained in the East. The object of my action was to render that position less perilous by urging the humanitarian Jews of the West to inquire frankly into and to use their influence to check the development of a deplorable situation. If Dr. Gaster's intervention has contributed to prevent the attainment of that object the responsibility is not mine. I am, Sir, YOUR VIENNA CORRESPONDENT. Vienna, Aug. 5." Note the accusations that Jews wanted to eliminate their Christian competition and take their land. Armenians are well-known for their business acumen and posed direct competition to Jewish interests. One further notes that Jews were notorious in the Soviet regime for "denouncing" their neighbors in order to take over their property and/or positions. This was easier for Jews, because a grossly disproportionate number of Jews held high positions as State officials in the Soviet regime, because Jews often spoke Yiddish, because of the racist tribal loyalty Jews tend to show one another, and further because the Jewish religion not only approves of such murderous treachery towards Gentiles, the Jewish religion encourages Jews to kill off their Gentile neighbors, and encourages the use of treachery and theft. The Jews also wanted to unseat the Sultan, and it is well known from Theodor Herzl, that he sought to pressure the Sultan through atrocities to help the Zionists, by informing the Sultan that the Jews controlled the press and could help or hurt the Empire depending upon whether the Sultan helped or hurt the Zionists. Note the date of 1896, which is the year Theodor Herzl published his Zionist book The Jewish State. The early atrocities, instigated by Jews, allowed Jews to discredit and blackmail the Sultan. The same type of tactics are often used to control politicians, Prehistory of the 1915 Genocide 3 6 who are encouraged to commit some illegal act, and then can be blackmailed by the threat of exposure, or thrown out of office by the exposure of their illegal or otherwise embarrassing acts. In addition, the early atrocities which were encouraged by Jews served to discredit the Turkish Empire in the eyes of the West, which was useful to the Jews who wanted to destroy the Empire. Beyond this, they caused dissensions within and without the Turkish Empire between Christians and Moslems, fomenting and prompting the Balkan Wars, which the Jews wanted to cause as a prelude to the First World War the Jews wanted to cause. Zionist Jews had no compunctions whatsoever about mass murdering Christians, especially when it forwarded their agenda. Jews are taught to kill Christians and believe that when their Jewish Messiah comes, he will mass murder all non-Jews. In the 1500's, Martin Luther wrote, among other things, "Further, they presume to instruct God and prescribe the manner in which he is to redeem them. For the Jews, these very learned saints, look upon God as a poor cobbler equipped with only a left last for making shoes. This is to say that he is to kill and exterminate all of us Goyim through their Messiah, so that they can lay their hands on the land, the goods, and the government of the whole world. And now a storm breaks over us with curses, defamation, and derision that cannot be expressed with words. They wish that sword and war, distress and every misfortune may overtake us accursed Goyim. They vent their curses on us openly every Saturday in their synagogues and daily in their homes. They teach, urge, and train their children from infancy to remain the bitter, virulent, and wrathful enemies of the Christians." 20 The Jewish book of Deuteronomy 7:2 states, "And when the LORD thy God shall deliver them before thee; thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them:" According to Jewish holy books, the Jewish Messiah will judge and then exterminate the "wicked", all non-Jews and assimilated Jews {Isaiah 1 1 . Jeremiah 3:17; 10:10-11; 23:5-8. Sanhedrin 105a. Zohar). The Jewish religion is virulently anti-Christian and anti-Moslem, as numerous knowledgeable authors have proven over the course of many centuries. 21 Psalm 110 says of the murderous Jewish King, whom the Jews intend to anoint as "Messiah"(see also: Psalm 2; 18 and 72), " The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou at my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool. 2 The LORD shall send the rod of thy strength out of 37 The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians Zion: rule thou in the midst of thine enemies. 3 Thy people shall be willing in the day of thy power, in the beauties of holiness from the womb of the morning: thou hast the dew of thy youth. 4 The LORD hath sworn, and will not repent, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchizedek. 5 The Lord at thy right hand shall strike through kings in the day of his wrath. 6 He shall judge among the heathen, he shall fill the places with the dead bodies; he shall wound the heads over many countries. 7 He shall drink of the brook in the way: therefore shall he lift up the head." 22 The Jewish Zohar informs us of the beliefs of Cabalistic Jews and their racist genocidal hatred of non-Jews. The Jewish Zohar, Volume 1, pages 2Sb-29a, states, "At that time the mixed multitude shall pass away from the world [***] The mixed multitude are the impurity which the serpent injected into Eve. From this impurity came forth Cain, who killed Abel. [* * *] for they are the seed of Amalek, of whom it is said, 'thou shalt blot out the memory of Amalek' [***] Various impurities are mingled in the composition of Israel, like animals among men. One kind is from the side of the serpent; another from the side of the Gentiles, who are compared to the beasts of the field; another from the mazikin (goblins), for the souls [29a] of the wicked are literally the mazikin (goblins) of the world; and there is an impurity from the side of the demons and evil spirits; and there is none so cursed among them as Amalek, who is the evil serpent, the 'strange god' . He is the cause of all unchastity and murder, and his twin-soul is the poison of idolatry, the two together being called Samael (lit. poison-god). There is more than one Samael, and they are not all equal, but this side of the serpent is accursed above all of them." 23 The Jewish Zohar Volume 1, page 47a, states, " ^^ AID Rabbi Abba: 'Nephesh hahaya' (living soul) truly denote the ^^' souls of Israel. They are the children of the Holy One and holy in ^^k his sight, but the souls of the heathen and idolatrous nations whence k*-^ come they?' Said Rabbi Eleazar: 'They emanate from the left side of the sephirotic tree of life, which is the side of impurity, and therefore they defile all that come into contact with them. It is written, 'Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, and creeping thing and beast of the earth after his kind' (Gen. 1-24). Wherefore does the word 'lemina' (after his kind) occur twice? It is to confirm what has just been stated, that the souls of Israel are pure and holy, but the souls of the heathen being impure and unholy are Prehistory of the 1915 Genocide 38 symbolized by the creeping thing and beast of the earth, and therefore, like the foresaken in circumcision, are cut off." 24 The Jewish Zohar, Volume 2, page 2196, states, "So they went nearer and they heard him saying: ' Crown, crown, two sons are kept outside, and there will be no peace or rest until the bird is thrown down in Csesarea.' R. Jose wept and said: 'Verily the Galuth is drawn out, and therefore the birds of heaven will not depart until the dominion of the idolatrous nations is removed from the earth, which will not be till the day when God will bring the world to judgement. '" 25 The Jewish Zohar, Volume 3, page 196, states, "It is, however, as R. Abba has said: all the other days are given over to the angelic principalities of the nations, but there is one day which will be the day of the Holy One, blessed be He, in which He will judge the heathen nations, and when their principalities shall fall from their high estate." 26 The Jewish Zohar, Volume 3, page 43a, states, "To these He appointed as ministers Samael and all his groups — these are like clouds to ride upon when He descends to earth: they are like horses. That the clouds are called 'chariots' is expressed in the words, 'Behold the Lord rideth upon a swift cloud, and shall come into Egypt' (Isa. xix, i). Thus the Egyptians saw their Chieftain like a horse bearing the chariot of the Holy One, and straightaway 'the idols of Egypt were moved at His presence, and the heart of Egypt melted in the midst of it' {Ibid.), i. e. they were 'moved' from their faith in their own Chieftain. And every firstling of an ass THOU SHALT REDEEM WITH A LAMB, AND IF THOU WILT NOT REDEEM IT. . . THOU SHALT BREAK HIS NECK." 27 The Jewish book of Zephaniah 2:11 teaches the Jews to destroy all other religions, "The LORD will be terrible unto them: for he will famish all the gods of the earth; and men shall worship him, every one from his place, even all the isles of the heathen." The Jewish book of Zechariah 14:9 instructs Jews to abolish all religions other than Judaism, 39 The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians "And the LORD shall be king over all the earth: in that day shall there be one LORD, and his name one." The Jewish Talmud, in the book of Sanhedrin folios 56a-60b, sets forth seven laws which it insists non-Jews must follow on pain of death (see also: Sanhedrin 20b; 88b; 97a-99b; 105a). These are called the "Noahide Laws". Rabbinical scholars fabricated these laws, in part, as a response to Christianity. Jewish leaders have already introduced these laws into the laws of the United States of America. 28 Christians, Hindus, Moslems, Buddhists, etc. who refuse to abandon their religious beliefs and become slaves of the Jews will all be killed. Anyone who questions Judaism will be killed. Anyone who disobeys the commands o