Years After Sexual Assault, Survivors Hounded To Pay Bills For The Rape Kit Exam

Enlarge this image toggle caption Ann Hermes/The Christian Science Monitor via Getty Images Ann Hermes/The Christian Science Monitor via Getty Images

Six years ago, a newly minted graduate of the School of the Art Institute of Chicago was working three part-time jobs and adjusting to life not as a student. She stopped in for a drink one night at a restaurant in Chicago's Bucktown neighborhood, where she got into a conversation with a guy. The next thing she remembers clearly was awakening at home the next morning, aching, covered in bruises, with a swollen lip.

She believed she had been raped and went to the local police station to file a report. The police sent her to a hospital emergency room nearby where, with her permission, a doctor did a medical forensic exam, checking her for injuries and taking evidence from her body and clothes to potentially use in a prosecution case. The exam took hours and made her even more miserable.

Police never made an arrest.

As time passed and the woman tried to move past the assault, she received regular, unwelcome reminders: bills from the hospital and emergency physicians group that treated her.

The physicians group eventually sent her bill to a collection agency, and she started receiving nagging phone calls as well. Now 28 and living near Dallas, she still gets phone calls and letters a couple of times a year ordering her to pay up.

There's often a disconnect between the emergency room personnel that take care of the person and the billing department that sends out the bills.

"When I get that phone call, it's still so raw. I'm shaking," says the woman, whose first name is Erin. (NPR has agreed not to use Erin's last name, to protect her privacy.)

For 25 years, the federal Violence Against Women Act has required any state that wants to be eligible for certain federal grants to certify that the state covers the cost of medical forensic exams for people who have been sexually assaulted.

Subsequent reauthorizations of the act have clarified that these individuals also can't be required to participate with law enforcement to get an exam; nor do they have to pay anything out of pocket for that exam at any point (not even if they would be reimbursed later).

And yet for some people who have been raped, the bills keep coming — despite this long-standing federal prohibition and other state laws that provide additional financial protections in many places.

"There's often a disconnect between the emergency room personnel that take care of the person and the billing department that sends out the bills," says Jennifer Pierce-Weeks, CEO of the International Association of Forensic Nurses, professionals who have specialized training in how to evaluate and care for victims of violent crime or abuse.

There is wide variation in how states meet their financial obligations to cover sexual assault exams — sometimes called "rape kits" — that collect evidence of the crime. Many states tap funds they receive under the federal Victims of Crime Act. Others use money from law enforcement or prosecutors' budgets or other designated options.

What services are covered as part of the rape exam can vary by state as well. Federal rules require that the patient be interviewed and examined for physical trauma, penetration or force, and that evidence be collected and evaluated.

But many states include additional services without charging victims, including testing and treatment for pregnancy or sexually transmitted diseases. Some may cover treatment for counseling, or for injuries that survivors experience during the assault.

Having financial protections on the books for people who have been raped, however, doesn't necessarily translate to seamless, no-cost services on the ground.

For instance, New York requires that patients treated for sexual assault receive some services at no charge beyond the federal requirements, including emergency contraception and treatment for STDs, says Christopher Bromson, executive director of the Crime Victims Treatment Center in New York.

Still, last November the New York attorney general's office announced settlements with seven hospitals that had illegally charged more than 200 such patients for medical forensic exams, with amounts ranging from $46 to $3,000. In some cases, the hospitals referred the individuals to bill collectors who dunned them for the payments.

Afterward, the Healthcare Association of New York State, a nonprofit group that advocates for better health services, teamed up with the state Department of Health and others to present four webinars for hospital personnel to explain their legal responsibilities.

Karen Roach, the association's senior director of regulatory affairs and rural health, says the billing problem in New York doesn't appear widespread.

"Some of these issues arose from greater automation of the billing process," Roach says. "Training is needed to flag these cases, to put systems in place not to automatically generate a bill."

Working with an advocacy group, Erin eventually got the hospital to stop billing her. But the emergency physicians group that treated her no longer exists, and her $131.68 bill has been bundled with other debts and resold to different collectors several times, she says.

When Erin tells a debt collector that the bill they're calling about is for services related to rape, "They say, 'Oh, we'll fix it,' but they don't," she says. "They just sell it again and it just becomes someone else's problem. But it's always my problem."

Despite state and federal laws, many people who were raped wind up paying for some medical services out of pocket, even if they have insurance. An analysis of billing records from 1,355 insured female rape survivors found that in 2013 they paid an average $948 out of pocket for prescription drugs and hospital inpatient or outpatient services during the first 30 days after the assault. That amount represented 14% of total costs, the study found.

"We just assumed that this was only a problem for women who fell through the cracks," says Kit Simpson, a professor in the department of health care leadership and management at the Medical University of South Carolina in Charleston, who co-authored the study. "But this was a systematic problem."

Some people who have been sexually assaulted don't want to use their insurance in any case, because they are worried about privacy or safety issues if family members or others find out, advocates say.

The Violence Against Women Act, often referred to as VAWA, is up for reauthorization this year. It's not clear if a new bill would address these payment issues. If states don't certify that they shoulder the cost of rape exams, funds can be frozen. (States must also certify that they don't require these patients to participate in the criminal justice system.)

The Department of Justice declined multiple requests for comment on whether and how those VAWA provisions are enforced.

Some advocates for people who have been sexually assaulted would like to see the federal definition of what must be included in a no-cost medical forensic exam broadened to include such services as testing and medication for pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections, including HIV. Such a move would level the playing field across the U.S., they say.

Janine Zweig, associate vice president of justice policy at the Urban Institute, who co-authored a study examining state payment practices for rape exams, says a federal standard should be considered. "Do we really want it to be about which state you live in?"

Kaiser Health News is a nonprofit, editorially independent program of the Kaiser Family Foundation. KHN is not affiliated with Kaiser Permanente.