Big Book of Facts:

“15. Leftists tend to hate anything that has an image of

being strong, good and successful. They hate

America, they hate Western civilization, they hate

white males, they hate rationality. The reasons that

leftists give for hating the West, etc. clearly do not

correspond with their real motives. They SAY they

hate the West because it is warlike, imperialistic,

sexist, ethnocentric and so forth, but where these

same faults appear in socialist countries or in

primitive cultures, the leftist finds excuses for them, or

at best he GRUDGINGLY admits that they exist;

whereas he ENTHUSIASTICALLY points out (and

often greatly exaggerates) these faults where they

appear in Western civilization. Thus it is clear that

these faults are not the leftist's real motive for hating

America and the West. He hates America and the

West because they are strong and successful.

16. Words like "self-confidence," "self-reliance,"

"initiative," "enterprise," "optimism," etc., play little

role in the liberal and leftist vocabulary. The leftist is

anti-individualistic, pro-collectivist. He wants society

to solve every one's problems for them, satisfy

everyone's needs for them, take care of them. He is

not the sort of person who has an inner sense of

confidence in his ability to solve his own problems

and satisfy his own needs. The leftist is antagohistic

to the concept of competition because, deep inside,

he feels like a loser.”—Ted Kazinsky

Divorce:

70% of all allegations of abuse in divorce/custody battles are “unfounded” after investigations. Gimme a min and I’ll try to find the source.

https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/8578086

While meant to act as a safety mechanism in cases where domestic violence is present, the ease of obtaining an order of protection and the instant benefits it provides the alleging party has created a system ripe for abuse. In fact, up to 70 percent of cases involving allegations of abuse during custody disputes are deemed unnecessary or false.

Clearly, protection orders that are meant to offer protection for those in serious situations are now being used as a weapon to turn the tide in divorce; a weapon that overwhelming targets men.

Sexism:

https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/8nsp65/socjus_prof_calls_for_toxic_masculinity_training/

Boys lag behind in school because of female gender bias: http://mitili.mit.edu/sites/default/files/project-documents/SEII-Discussion-Paper-2016.07-Terrier.pdf

For the first time, more than half (54%) of American women aged 25-29 are childless, as are nearly a third (31%) of women aged 30 to 34. By the end of our fertile years, about one sixth of women (17%) are childless.

On the need for fathers: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5O_FLUWYmg

>The Counseling and Mental Health Center at the University of Texas at Austin recently launched a new program to help male students “take control over their gender identity and develop a healthy sense of masculinity.”

>Treating masculinity as if it were a mental health crisis, “MasculinUT” is organized by the school’s counseling staff and most recently organized a poster series encouraging students to develop a “healthy model of masculinity.”

https://pjmedia.com/trending/university-of-texas-to-treat-masculinity-as-a-mental-health-issue/

The Verge: "The internet is enabling a community of men who want to kill women. They need to be stopped." Exploits a tragedy to virtue signal and slander men all at once.

there are diversity quotas built into the purchasing departments of corporate America.

https://www.law.umich.edu/newsandinfo/features/Pages/starr_gender_disparities.aspx

98% of alimony payments are from men to women:

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/how-the-tax-overhaul-will-affect-alimony-deductions

There are still a huge number of people around who don't understand what the much-quoted gender pay gap actually measures. More than half the population mistakenly thinks that the quoted gap ("77 cents for every dollar a man gets", or 81 cents or whatever number is being quoted today) is actually the difference for women in the same job, with the same skills and working the same hours.

In other words, most people don't have the first clue about how crudely the "gender wage gap" is calculated.

Often, a picture can drive the point home far better than words. So show them this chart, which should clear up their confusion.

As you can see, the actual "like for like" gender pay gap in the UK is just 0.8%, which is a LOT less than the 19% - 23% that idiot feminists are always claiming.

The worldwide average figure for the 33 countries covered in this study is 1.6%.

Personally, my guess is that last remaining gap is due to women taking more vacation days per year, on average, than men do. To my knowledge, there have only been a couple of studies done on this topic. Both did find that women took more vacation days (even before they had kids), but the size of the difference varied quite a lot. More research is needed. Vacation time is one of very few personal choices not accounted for in this study, so it likely does contribute to that remaining gap.

Here is the source, if you need it:

https://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2017/08/daily-chart

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/06/women-see-more-workplace-rudeness-from-other-women-than-from-men.html

Female offenders of all races received shorter sentences than similarly situated White or Black male offenders, according to the US sentencing commission: https://www.ussc.gov/research/research-reports/demographic-differences-sentencing

Oppression means "cruel or unjust treatment", and virtually all of our institutions are anti-male. Conversely, females are given a wide range of institutional privileges that males lack.

Baby boys can be legally mutilated at birth. Their foreskins are then used for female beauty products.

The education system discriminates against boys. They are often drugged for natural boyish behavior, and docility/conformity is rewarded. There is little in the way of "hands on" learning. Most teachers are female, many of whom are feminists.

Universities have become hostile toward young men. While young women complain about "feeling unsafe", young men are subjected to kangaroo courts in which they can have their lives destroyed by a jilted ex lover. They are portrayed as rapists in waiting. Entire departments like gender studies demonize their sex. Scholarships favor young women even though they make up the majority of college students.

Workplaces increasingly discriminate against white and asian males in the name of "diversity".

The criminal justice system is much harsher on males than females. One study in the UK determined that if men were treated like women by the police and courts, 26 out of 36 incarcerated men would not be there.

The family courts are a complete horror show. Men routinely lose the houses they have spent their lives paying for and lose access to their children. Imagine how many female suicides there would be if women were forced to subsidize their exes and his new "baby momma" while being denied access to their children.

In many countries men are unable to vote unless they are subject to conscription.

There is a rape culture alright -- feminists just have the sex wrong. Boys as young as twelve are told they should be happy when they are molested. Women are given slaps on the wrist for molesting boys. Female on male rape isn't even legally recognized in many countries. Men are routinely raped in prison. Boys are raped by female guards in juvenile detention centers. No one gives a shit.

Domestic violence against males is not even recognized by many governments and charities. In fact men are often themselves arrested when they call the police after being abused.

False accusations by women are seldom punished. A man can be terrorized over the mere threat of a false accusation of rape or domestic violence.

Men work longer hours, pay the majority of taxes and die younger yet receive less services by the state, including health care funding.

Men are now being accused of "sexual misconduct" and having their lives destroyed for completely trivial behavior (like the PBS guy who was fired for putting a hand on a woman's back).

Major media institutions are openly anti-male.

When men are suffering they are victim-blamed and told it's due to "toxic masculinity." On the one hand feminists demand that men and boys act more like women, yet most women find feminine men sexually unattractive. Similarly, men are blamed for trying to earn more money than women, yet women continue to seek out partners who earn more than they do.

Some homeless shelters reject men even though men make up the vast majority of rough sleepers.

Every aspect of a man's life is now being policed by feminists, up to the way men naturally sit.

Globally men are much more likely to be killed in wars and genocides.

I could go on indefinitely. Not only is the feminist movement past its sell date, they are working to establish female supremacy and male subjugation in every aspect of human existence. They should be regarded in the same manner as the Ku Klux Klan.

The reason they are able to continue their outrageous campaigns is because the majority of CEO's and politicians are male. However, it should be painfully obvious at this point that men in power do not try to "privilege" other men. Quite the opposite in fact. Both men and women favor women.

We are not living in a patriarchy. We are living in a gynocracy.

Man get’s raped at Cornell, has proof, Cornell tries to shut him down: https://theralphretort.com/video-cornell-tries-to-intimidate-man-after-he-reports-abuse-at-hands-of-ex-girlfriend-3023018/

https://www.reddit.com/r/recruitinghell/comments/85sk5a/as_a_white_man_i_was_promised_that_the_government/

No such thing as matriarchal societies in the past: https://traditionsofconflict.com/blog/2018/3/17/where-are-the-matriarchies

Competency, dominance hierarchies, etc. : https://sci-hub.tw/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12110-015-9227-6

https://www.nas.org/articles/from_suffrage_to_suppressing_speech_the_increasing_hostility_of_women_towar

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/85jp15/women_pens_book_about_drugging_and_assaulting_men/

Where are the matriarchies? - "Today anthropologists generally agree that cases of true matriarchy do not exist in human society, and that they most probably never have." https://traditionsofconflict.com/blog/2018/3/17/where-are-the-matriarchies …

Dividing the Sexes: Misrepresentation of Domestic Violence Statistics in Australia: https://culturalanalysis.net/2018/03/18/dividing-the-sexes-domestic-violence-statistics-in-australia/

Sexist oppression by (80% female) public school teachers: playful, rebellious boys are punished and stigmatized; playful, rebellious girls are rewarded and validated. Insidious way to break masculine confidence as early as possible.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29545760?dopt=Abstract

Study finds that minority and female judges display "ingroup favoritism," but not white or male judges. http://sci-hub.tv/http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1065912918761008 …

http://sci-hub.tv/http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1065912918761008

Friendly reminder that the further you get from mean IQ, the more that men outnumber women - in both directions. There are fewer influential women in history because there are biologically fewer women who have the capacity to be influential. This is also why more men are violent criminals - more male retards than female, because nature can't chance having caretakers that are too dumb so it hedges its bets with women and treats men like a laboratory experiment.

At 135 IQ, men outnumber women two to one. Among people with 170 IQ, of which there are very few, men outnumber women ten to one. This number increases radically as you get even higher. It is likely that there has never truly been a woman born with 180+ IQ (Notice how women reported to have god-tier IQs like Marilyn Savant or Judit Polgar have achieved practically nothing noteworthy - no creative thoughts, no discoveries, no world-beating achievements) though admittedly at those power levels measuring intelligence gets tricky.

Jessica Jones Admits to Discrimination in Director Search

http://boundingintocomics.com/2018/03/08/jessica-jones-actively-discriminates-against-men-in-director-search/

Women’s femininity scores have decreased significantly (d = −.26) between 1993 and 2012, whereas their masculinity remained stable. No significant changes were observed for men. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11199-016-0625-y

Study: Women Now Leaving STEM Fields To Pursue ‘Social Justice’ Degrees:

https://pjmedia.com/trending/study-women-now-leaving-stem-fields-pursue-social-justice-degrees/

Balanced and very extensive (1,700 studies), domestic violence research and statistics. Victims of abuse men/women - 23% / 19%; women more likely to be perpetrators 28.3% vs. 21.6%:

http://www.domesticviolenceresearch.org/pages/12_page_findings.htm

Men and women are exactly the same! Except all men are pigs! Oh, and there’s infinite genders! In reality there’s no genders at all! And gender and sexual orientation are social constructs. Except when you’re born that way! But cis people just need to stop! And women are unique! And men are privileged! But we’re all the same!

MEN:78% of suicides, 93% of federal inmates, 60% of the homeless, 63 percent longer prison sentences for the same crime, live five years less than women on average.Men the only oppressor class in history who are less educated, more victimized and have shorter lives than those they oppress. (pjmedia.com)

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/80cb6v/men_helping_men/

http://quillette.com/2018/02/24/behavioral-ecology-male-violence/

Among hunter-gatherers males commit about 96 percent of homicides and are victims 84 percent of the time

Marines quietly lower combat training requirements to help female officers: https://hotair.com/archives/2018/02/20/marines-quietly-lower-combat-training-requirements-help-female-officers/

SPLC lists A Voice For Men as a hategroup: https://archive.is/CNusU

https://www.inc.com/suzanne-lucas/huffpost-editor-says-new-years-resolution-is-to-kill-all-men.html

'A gender equality paradox': Countries with more gender equality have fewer female STEM grads: http://www.thejournal.ie/gender-equality-countries-stem-girls-3848156-Feb2018/

Systemic abuse of men accused of rape in the U.K. court system who are later exonerated by text message records that the prosecution refuses to give the defense in discovery.

https://talent.works/blog/2018/01/08/the-science-of-the-job-search-part-i-13-data-backed-ways-to-win/

Being a woman increases likelihood of landing job interviews by 48.3%

The male unemployment rate is higher and has been for decades. Being male is a factor that makes being hired more difficult. US link has been updated.

US: https://www.bls.gov/web/empsit/cpseea10.htm

UK: http://www.inside-man.co.uk/2014/07/01/male-graduates-caught-in-gender-employment-gap/

In addition to being more likely to be unemployed, men are much more likely to be homeless. The narrative that "men are privileged" just doesn't add up- in what society odes the privileged class have more difficulty finding work and more likely to be on the streets without basic shelter?

Women make up 75% of the HR workforce and 74.2% of HR management

https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.htm

No, Women were not oppressed throughout history: https://medium.com/@robertingersoll/no-women-were-not-oppressed-throughout-history-e719355b79ed

Gender differences and preferences are biological: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/icd.2064/abstract

Feminist teachers downgrade boys’ scores. Negatively impact boys’ education

Eliminating feminist teacher bias

erases boys’ falling grades, study finds: https://mensrightsandfeminism.wordpress.com/2017/12/25/study-feminist-teachers-negatively-affect-boys-education/

http://uir.ulster.ac.uk/24270/

Women do routinely lie about being on birth control and try to trap men into paying child support: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-5271573/People-reveal-lied-using-contraceptives.html

Guardian writer advocates illegal discrimination against men: http://archive.is/C6IWK

Newsbeat is looking for a Trainee Multi-Media Journalist. This is a Creative Access scheme for people from a black, Asian or non-white ethnic minority background

http://archive.fo/Jdpah

Duolinguo engaged in malicious hiring quotas to reach 50/50 gender parity: http://archive.fo/82PwV

Women report higher levels of happiness than men

Lowest female unemployment in a long time in 2018

Oxford University gives women (and men) more time to pass exams because of female fragility: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/2018/01/22/oxford-university-gives-women-time-pass-exams/

Yale let accusers text each other to coordinate testimony against male during Title IX hearing: lawsuit: http://archive.fo/XstaW

An email was just sent to the entire organization promoting this:

https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/2017sustainingwomeninstemreport.pdf

Full of extreme and inaccurate Tumblr-level SJW feminst beliefs, such as "manterrupting", "microinequalities", that men take credit for women's ideas, that only women are taught not to interrupt, that men are all terrible sexists who dislike women, that all men are socially advantaged in "all facets of life" while all women are disadvantaged, that all men have negative socialized perceptions of women (but not vice versa at all), demonizing "white males", and directly pushing feminism by name.

What the hell? This is fucking insane.

This is just the latest in a long string of blatant pushings of far-left SJW SocJus ideology at NASA. They're also currently email-pushing people to register for a course all about "privilege".

https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/6jvxxb/nasa_goes_full_sjw_pushing_privilege_theory_and/

https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/6r1xj3/nasa_continuing_to_go_full_sjw_integrating_power/

https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/6rilf4/nasa_going_full_sjw_part_3_indoctrinating_its/

Blatant Sexism From The BBC, calling 'Times Up' on men-only events and defending women only events in the same article.: https://www.reddit.com/r/CringeAnarchy/comments/7t1eax/blatant_sexism_from_the_bbc_calling_times_up_on/

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-42827333

https://i.redd.it/z4nij4rulbc01.jpg

BBC Audit Reveals 'No Evidence Of Gender Bias In Pay Decision-Making': http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/bbc-equal-pay-audit-reveals_uk_5a703922e4b05836a2561874

https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/7u6whr/bbc_men_to_get_pay_rises_as_review_rejects_gender/

This is pretty hilarious. So many BBC feminists acting like spoilt brats, crying sexism, demanding apologies, threatening to quit etc and it turns out the BBC had just been underpaying those with less experience, and more of those underpaid were men!

Child development: "based on our systematic review of the currently available large data base we conclude that in general the differences between parenting of boys versus girls are minimal.":

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4945059/

dominance in primates has 2 components: a competitive one involving physical coercion+a cooperative one involving competence-based attraction to high-ranking individuals (proto-prestige)...competence grants same general type of power(dependence-based) in humans n other primates":

https://sci-hub.tw/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12110-015-9227-6

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CiZ6uRlm6sM

In the UK: women paid more than men for part-time work (10-30 hrs/wk); men more for full-time: net gender impact on wages nears zero: Office of National Statistics summarized here: equalpayportal.co.uk/statistics/

Men with prostate cancer have access to fewer specialist nurses than patients with other cancers…despite it being a bigger killer than breast cancer: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-5355953/Men-prostate-cancer-access-fewer-nurses.html

Harvard shutting down same-sex clubs, but female-only groups get “grace period”: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/02/06/harvard-imposes-black-list-on-male-clubs-women-s-groups-may-get-grace-period-to-become-gender-focused.html

Diversity:

The Scientific Council for Government Policy (in Dutch: Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid, WRR) released a scientific report this week, which shows that ethnic diversity negatively impacts social cohesion.

Full report (in Dutch) here:

https://www.wrr.nl/publicaties/verkenningen/2018/05/29/de-nieuwe-verscheidenheid

Translated from the full report (page 87):

Our analysis shows that, when a neighbourhood becomes more diverse, it becomes less socially cohesive. This result is significant. Social-economic factors have been taken into account. Although the social-economic status of a neighbourhood impacts cohesion, the impact of diversity on social cohesion IS LARGER THAN THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL ECONOMIC STATUS.

https://www.dutchnews.nl/news/2018/05/the-dutch-are-becoming-more-diverse-one-in-five-have-at-least-one-foreign-parent/

English news article which, safe for one small paragraph, ignores the negative impact of ethnic diversity.

https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2018/05/29/het-gaat-niet-meer-alleen-over-turken-en-marokkanen-a1604700

Dutch newspaper article, also downplaying hard.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_Council_for_Government_Policy

See the Email Pluribus Unum study by Robert Putnam. A much larger dataset of polities in the US shows the same thing. Interestingly enough it correlates with racial diversity. Diverse areas vote less, volunteer less, join Civic and social groups less and have less dense social networks even among their own race.

All that diversity increases is television viewership and (((awareness of political issues))) but for the later the means to resolve them are depreciated in diverse hoods.

This stuff needs to be pushed more, it's to the most straightforward and empirical anti-diversity argument there is.

http://genocide.org/the-grief-exception-diversity-causes-depression/

Former dean at Mizzou fired for questioning diversity quotas: https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=10371

Most white people think they can work with other races to solve racial issues. Most other races do not (only 46% say that they can work with whites): http://genforwardsurvey.com/assets/uploads/2017/10/GenForward-Oct-2017-Final-Report.pdf

BBC seeking “non-white” journalists only: http://dailycaller.com/2018/01/17/bbc-non-white-journalist-trainees-only/

BBC firing White men: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/oct/02/bbc-presenter-jon-holmes-the-now-show-sacked

BBC diversity statistics (minorities already over-represented): http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/diversity/pdf/diversity-and-inclusion-strategy-2016.pdf

There are benefits in ethnocentric cooperation

And ethnocentric cooperation is more effective than other strategies: http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/3/7.html

Millenial attitudes towards races and stuff: http://genforwardsurvey.com/assets/uploads/2017/10/GenForward-Oct-2017-Final-Report.pdf

Good Fences: The Importance of Setting Boundaries for Peaceful Coexistence

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0095660

Economics:

Behavioral economics (particularly when reconciled with neuroscience and rigorous psychometrics) is actually pretty provocative. However for it to be useful, the social scientists would have to accept the premise that all their equalism is nonsense and that things like race and gender are real. Until then, they're just engaging in ad hoc rationalization. (no source, look it up)

Mission

Immigration:

Flow of Refugees to US has Nearly Slowed to a Halt

Resettling refugees from the Middle East in the U.S. is not only a security risk but also too expensive, Center for Immigration Studies’ Executive Director Mark Krikorian argued Thursday before a House panel.

“We found that it costs 12 times as much to resettle a refugee from Syria, from the Middle East, in the United States as it does to provide for them in their own region,” Krikorian testified before the House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security.

One of the more intellectually sinister arguments for letting illegal aliens stay in the country seems to be the following: You cannot deport them when they are children because they are too young. You cannot deport them when they are adults because this is the only country they know.

It's de facto amnesty for children and their parents who of course cannot be deported because of the children. And it's done to build a voting block of poor, government dependent lower class citizens who vote Democrat and drive down labor costs for big businesses. At the end of the day, middle America suffers for the political and monetary greed of a relative few.

Congressional seats are predicated on total population not total citizen population. Illegal aliens count towards congressional seats, giving high illegal alien states overrepresentation in Congress.

1 in 3 somalis suffer from mental illness: https://themuslimissue.wordpress.com/2013/10/09/170000-mentally-ill-tied-to-trees-and-left-to-die-in-somalia/

Border Control agents favor a wall:

https://www.npr.org/2017/01/26/511745401/head-of-border-patrol-union-on-trumps-wall-plans

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trump-backs-raise-act/

Trump administration rolls out global campaign to combat those who overstay their visas in the US

In 2017 New York City, a 33% white city and President Trump's hometown, Non-Whites committed 93.1% of the murders and 97% of the nonfatal shootings

Under Trump ICE has shifted focus towards employers. He made the campaign promise and now ICE has quadrupled the focus on employers.

BUT 1986: Employer sanctions and interior enforcement

The Border Patrol's priorities have changed over the years. In 1986, the Immigration Reform and Control Act placed renewed emphasis on controlling illegal immigration by going after the employers that hire illegal aliens. The belief was that jobs were the magnet that attracted most illegal aliens to come to the United States. The Border Patrol increased interior enforcement and Form I-9 audits of businesses through an inspection program known as "employer sanctions". Several agents were assigned to interior stations, such as within the Livermore Sector in Northern California.

Employer sanctions never became the effective tool it was expected to be by Congress. Illegal immigration continued to swell after the 1986 amnesty despite employer sanctions. By 1993, Californians passed Proposition 187, denying benefits to illegal aliens and criminalizing illegal aliens in possession of forged green cards, identification cards, and Social Security numbers. It also authorized police officers to question non-nationals as to their immigration status and required police and sheriff departments to cooperate and report illegal aliens to the INS. Proposition 187 drew nationwide attention to illegal immigration.

California illegal immigrant statistics https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2u4Vlgr2iHs

Please don't fall for the trick of calling illegal aliens immigrants. It lets dishonest creeps frame wanting people to follow the legal process as anti immigrant since people who arrive here or are staying here using extra legal means are now what the word immigrant means. It's just a shitty gaslighting tactic.

Immigrants don't need sanctuary. They are citizens. Illegal non citizens are who the sanctuary is for.

I'm not sure what world you're living in but you're not allowed to hire non citizens. You're not allowed to house them either. That's two new crimes that happen with every single illegal alien (unless they don't work.) If they do work, then they are being payed under the table (dodging several regulations like work safety and min wage often. Unknown number of laws broken here) or they could be using identity theft so they would be able to work utilizing this fraud. There's also the mire of illegal housing units and practices that they get involved with since they're not supposed to be rented to in the first place, so they can't go complain to the state that their landlord isn't following regulations.

I'm sure there's plenty of other problems that are much worse than I mentioned, but that's a handful of crimes that happen with just about every non citizen who is here illegally no matter how good of a person they are. I'm not even bringing up the way they affect the economy. I just want you to recognize that they definitively cause crime to increase wherever they go because of what I outlined. Unless you want to tell yourself that those things aren't crimes...

DACA is terrible:

https://www.lifezette.com/polizette/fmr-uscis-investigator-theres-huge-amount-fraud-daca-program/

1,500 acid attacks have been recorded in London since 2011

1/3 of illegals do not even work

Americans in favor of slashing immigration, increasing border security, instituting meritocratic requirements for immigration: https://www.numbersusa.com/news/harvard-poll-81-percent-all-voters-support-reducing-immigration-levels

Oxford grooming gang: https://www.reddit.com/r/news/comments/86w35h/oxford_men_guilty_of_sexual_exploitation_on_a/

http://quillette.com/2018/02/03/open-borders-dangerous-idea/

Liberals push for multiculturalism without thinking of the consequences. White kids at age 5 do well naturally but then get pushed down by foreigners like Roma Gypsies or Pakistanis. It takes extra time and money to teach English as a 2nd language. Some cultures do not even place an emphasis on education and instead prefer to be dependent on welfare. Mohammed Salim has 11 children and has no plans to work because he gets free money from taxpayers. America will get dragged down to the average of all nations.

Texas Police Arrest 12 People for Alleged Animal Ritual Killings

http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2018/03/17/texas-police-arrest-12-alleged-animal-ritual-killings/

Copied for posterity...

________________________________________

Diversity + Proximity = War

– Social trust is negatively affected by ethnic diversity, case study in Denmark from 1979 to the present.

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2012.00289.x/abstract

– Ethnic homogeneity and Protestant traditions positively impact individual and societal levels of social trust.

http://esr.oxfordjournals.org/content/21/4/311.short

– “In longitudinal perspective, [across European regions], an increase in immigration is related to a decrease in social trust.”

http://sf.oxfordjournals.org/content/93/3/1211.abstract

– Immigration undermines the moral imperative of those who most favor welfare benefits for the neediest.

http://cos.sagepub.com/content/53/2/120.abstract

– The negative effect of community diversity on social cohesion is likely causal.

https://academic.oup.com/esr/article/32/1/54/2404332/Does-Ethnic-Diversity-Have-a-Negative-Effect-on

– In Switzerland, social peace between diverse factions isn’t maintained by integrated coexistence, but rather by strong topographic and political borders that separate groups and allow them autonomy.

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0095660

– “Our analysis supports the hypothesis that violence between groups can be inhibited by both physical and political boundaries.”

http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4939-1705-1_12

– Diversity hinders between-group cooperation at both the one-on-one and group levels.

http://spq.sagepub.com/content/78/4/324.short

– The best chance for peace in Syria is better borders (intrastate or through the creation of new states) “suited to current geocultural regions”, and tribal autonomy.

http://www.necsi.edu/research/social/syria/syria.pdf

– Using data from US states, study finds a negative relationship between ethnic polarization and trust.

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1465-7287.2010.00215.x/abstract

– Diversity is associated with more White support for nationalist parties, except at the local level where large immigrant populations cut into vote totals for nationalist parties.

http://sf.oxfordjournals.org/content/92/1/249

– In Australia, ethnic diversity lowers social cohesion and increases “hunkering”, providing support for Putnam’s thesis finding the same results in the US.

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/juaf.12015/abstract

– After controlling for a self-selection bias, study finds that ethnic diversity in English schools reduces trust in same-age people and does not make White British students more inclusive in their attitudes towards immigrants.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X14001392

– In Germany, residential diversity reduces natives’ trust in neighbors, while it also reduces immigrants’ trust but through a different pathway.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X1400074X

– Increasing social pluralism (diversity) is correlated with increased chance of collective violence.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/425106?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

– “[E]thnic heterogeneity [diversity] explains 55% of the variation in the scale of ethnic conflicts, and the results of regression analysis disclose that the same relationship more or less applies to all 187 countries. … [E]thnic nepotism is the common cross-cultural background factor which supports the persistence of ethnic conflicts in the world as long as there are ethnically divided societies.”

http://www.scirp.org/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=1251240

– Genetic Similarity Theory (GST) could help explain why diverse groups in close proximity increases ethnic conflict and ethnic nepotism.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886912005569

– Genetic diversity has contributed significantly to frequency of ethnic civil conflict, intensity of social unrest, growth of unshared policy preferences, and economic inequality over the last half-century.

https://www.nber.org/papers/w21079

– Using social science data and computer modeling, researchers found that policies that attempt to create neighborhoods that are both integrated and socially cohesive are “a lost cause”.

http://msutoday.msu.edu/news/2013/study-asks-is-a-better-world-possible/

– The numbers and the genetic distance matter. Minority groups that get above a certain critical mass, and that are culturally distant from the majority culture, begin to self-segregate from the majority, moving society toward division and away from cooperation.

http://www.ifs.org.uk/uploads/publications/wps/WP201530.pdf

– Using data from Copenhagen school registers, researchers found that native Danes opt out of public schools when the immigrant population concentration hits 35% or more.

http://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/wp-content/uploads/School-Choice-Universal-Vouchers-and-Native-Flight-from-Local-Schools.pdf

– In the most liberal region in the US, San Francisco and surrounding suburbs, White parents are pulling their kids out of public schools that are becoming increasingly asian.

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2005/12/the_new_separate_but_equal.html

– School integration (forced proximate Diversity) will not close race achievement gaps.

http://www.usnews.com/opinion/knowledge-bank/articles/2016-01-08/the-academic-benefit-of-reducing-school-segregation-may-be-overblown

– Exclusionary dating is a natural consequence of racial diversity.

http://sf.oxfordjournals.org/content/89/3/807

– As diversity increases, politics becomes more tribalistic.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/06/business/economy/racial-identity-and-its-hostilities-return-to-american-politics.html?_r=0

– Company diversity policies don’t help minorities or women, and they psychologically discriminate against White men.

https://hbr.org/2016/01/diversity-policies-dont-help-women-or-minorities-and-they-make-white-men-feel-threatened

– Greater classroom and neighborhood diversity is linked to stronger tendencies to choose same-ethnic rather than cross-ethnic friends.

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jora.12248/abstract

– A longitudinal test of the impact of diversity finds that it makes existing residents feel unhappier and more socially isolated.

https://www.academia.edu/3479330/Does_Ethnic_Diversity_Have_a_Negative_Effect_on_Attitudes_towards_the_Community_A_Longitudinal_Analysis_of_the_Causal_Claims_within_the_Ethnic_Diversity_and_Social_Cohesion_Debate

– Internal dissension stoked by ethnic, social, political, and religious diversity, rather than environmental degradation, caused the collapse of the urbanized Cahokia Indian Tribe.

http://archaeologynewsnetwork.blogspot.nl/2016/02/internal-dissension-cited-as-reason-for.html

– The volunteer participation rate in America hit a record low last year, declining 0.4% from the previous year, and has been declining since 2005. Not coincidentally, the racial composition of America has become more fragmented during the same time.

http://freebeacon.com/culture/volunteer-participation-hits-record-low/

– A sense of social cohesion with the people who live around us is as happiness-inducing as love for the place itself.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/is-where-you-belong/201603/can-potluck-make-you-not-want-move

– Our desire for ‘like-minded others’ is hard-wired.

http://medicalxpress.com/news/2016-02-desire-like-minded-hard-wired.html

– “The Evolutionary Dominance of Ethnocentric Cooperation”

Recent agent-based computer simulations suggest that ethnocentrism, often thought to rely on complex social cognition and learning, may have arisen through biological evolution. From a random start, ethnocentric strategies dominate other possible strategies (selfish, traitorous, and humanitarian) based on cooperation or non-cooperation with in-group and out-group agents. Here we show that ethnocentrism eventually overcomes its closest competitor, humanitarianism, by exploiting humanitarian cooperation across group boundaries as world population saturates.

http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/3/7.html

– A wealthy Virginia county that is rapidly racially diversifying is getting poorer and less socially cohesive.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/virginia-news/this-model-of-wealthy-suburban-living-is-starting-to-fray/2016/04/02/e9ad0ace-f107-11e5-a61f-e9c95c06edca_story.html

– Gender diversity does not promote nonconformity in decision-making bodies. (But individual ability diversity does.)

http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2382

– High ethnic diversity has a negative effect on innovation, but high “values diversity” has the opposite effect, as long as ethnic diversity is low. The best innovation happens in countries that are ethnically homogenous but diverse in values orientation.

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13504851.2015.1130785

– Growing racial diversity in Houston is contributing to declining construction standards and aggravating the impact of natural disasters.

http://www.amerika.org/politics/the-great-houston-flood-of-2016-and-the-consequences-of-minority-rule/

– As an explanation of recent voting behavior, ethnic origin trumps class differences. “…the political salience of white ethnicity persists, suggesting that ethnic groups do not simply dealign or politically “assimilate” over time.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629804000642

– Globalization and the internet are increasing the proximity of human diversity and consequently increasing mutual animosity as well. “The scholars traced the phenomenon to what they called ‘environmental spoiling.’ The nearer we get to others, the harder it becomes to avoid evidence of their irritating habits. Proximity makes differences stand out.”

https://www.bostonglobe.com/ideas/2017/04/21/how-technology-created-global-village-and-put-each-other-throats/pu7MyoAkdyVComb9aKyu6K/story.html

http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/03/12/cutting-welfare-illegal-immigrants-would-pay-trump%E2%80%99s-border-wall-study

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/home-office-jihadis-council-houses-isis-support-fight-terrorism-strategy-operation-constrain-a8030321.html

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/britains-worst-ever-child-grooming-12165527.amp?__twitter_impression=true

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/03/11/1000-children-may-have-victims-britains-biggest-ever-child-abuse/

Asian child sex victims suffer more than white children, court rules

Judge agreed that ethnicity of victims was an ‘aggravating feature’ in sentencing appeal of convicted paedophile

Asian victims of child sex crimes suffer more than white children and their attackers should accordingly be punished more severely, the court of appeal has ruled.

https://www.theguardian.com/law/2015/sep/17/asian-child-sex-victims-suffer-more-than-white-children-court-rules

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telford_child_sex_abuse_ring

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-security/teacher-tried-to-create-army-of-children-to-launch-terror-attacks-in-london-idUSKCN1GE2CU

Report: UK Taxpayer Hands £6 Million a Year to Islamic Charities Working to 'Damage our Society':

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/02/26/report-uk-taxpayer-6-million-year-islamic-charities-damage-society/

London sees 20% rise in rape reports in a year, but police admit they 'don't understand' reason:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/rape-london-reports-met-police-rise-crime-sexual-assault-a8225821.html

London – Rapes Rise By 20% In A Year: https://thegoldwater.com/news/19201-London-Rapes-Rise-By-20-In-A-Year

In the UK, 84% of the 264 offenders convicted of grooming between 2005 and 2017 were of south Asian heritage.: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-tyne-43153556

Data Shows 90% of ICE Arrests Had Pending Charges and Criminal Records

https://thegoldwater.com/news/18526-Data-Shows-90-of-ICE-Arrests-Had-Pending-Charges-and-Criminal-Records

Drinking and Driving Plagues Latino Immigrants

https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5572465

High rate of Hispanic DUIs roils families, officials

https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/transportation/article/High-rate-of-Hispanic-DUIs-roils-families-6324422.php

Birth hotels (Chinese): http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/01/feds-raid-20-chinese-immigrant-birth-hotels-los-angeles/

More on birth tourism: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/feds-raid-l-maternity-hotel-birth-tourists-n315996

Study: Young Muslim male migrants fuel dramatic rise in violence in Germany. “92% of the additional crimes recorded could be attributed to the increase in refugees”

https://gellerreport.com/2018/01/muslim-immigratyion-92-crime-rise.html/#comment-1122104

Subsidizing birth increases fertility: https://www.economist.com/news/asia/21734319-subsidising-parenthood-appears-work-wonders-small-town-japan-doubles-its-fertility-rate?cid1=cust/ddnew/email/n/n/2018019n/owned/n/n/ddnew/n/n/n/nap/Daily_Dispatch/email&etear=dailydispatch

Mexico encourages illegal immigration to the U.S.: https://fairus.org/issue/illegal-immigration/mexicos-defense-illegal-immigrants

Asylum seekers account for half of all foreign criminals in Australia: http://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/01/12/austrian-interior-minister-asylum-seekers-half-foreign-criminals/

New research indicates that illegal immigrants in the US are at least 142% more likely to be convicted of a crime:

https://crimeresearch.org/2018/01/impact-illegal-aliens-crime-rates/

African Asylum seekers bring unbeatable strain of tuberculosis to Europe: https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2018-01/uoz-cor010918.php

https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/01/17/h-1b-immigrants-make-up-nearly-three-quarters-of-silicon-valley-tech-workforce-report-says/

Migrant Crisis: 77 Per Cent of Belgians 'No Longer Feel at Home'

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/01/18/majority-belgians-no-longer-feel-home/

The number of rapes reported to authorities in Sweden increased by 10 percent in 2017, according to new preliminary figures from the country's National Council on Crime Prevention (Brå).: https://www.thelocal.se/20180118/reported-rapes-in-sweden-up-by-10-percent

Yale Researchers: Not 11 Million But “22.8 Million Undocumented Immigrants”: http://www.vdare.com/posts/yale-researchers-not-11-million-but-22-8-million-undocumented-immigrants

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aylesbury_child_sex_abuse_ring

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banbury_child_sex_abuse_ring

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bristol_child_sex_abuse_ring

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derby_child_sex_abuse_ring

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halifax_child_sex_abuse_ring

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keighley_child_sex_abuse_ring

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxford_child_sex_abuse_ring

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peterborough_sex_abuse_case

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rochdale_child_sex_abuse_ring

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotherham_child_sexual_exploitation_scandal

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telford_child_sex_abuse_ring

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jan/26/illegals-commit-crimes-double-rate-native-born-stu/?utm_campaign=shareaholic&utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=socialnetwork:

The report, from the Crime Prevention Research Center, used a previously untapped set of data from Arizona that detailed criminal convictions and found that illegal immigrants between 15 and 35 are less than 3 percent of the state’s population, but nearly 8 percent of its prison population.

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3099992

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/teens-roam-streets-with-rifles-as-crime-swamps-sweden-q83g055k9

The number of Germans with a small arms permit has almost doubled in two years. Politicians are worried.: https://global.handelsblatt.com/politics/germans-are-up-in-arms-882105?ref=MTA5NDE2&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=post

company “safe shorts” sells out completely in Germany: http://m.bild.de/regional/berlin/sexuelle-noetigung/sporthose-schafft-sicherheit-fuer-frauen-54662438.bildMobile.html

Racism:

https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/8nej81/socjus_race_studies_conference_discusses_white/

Body cameras: http://www.nber.org/papers/w22399.pdf

Humor: https://www.thecollegefix.com/post/44932/

Unviversity sees drop in alleged hatecrimes after installing cameras

https://www.forbes.com/sites/scottmendelson/2018/05/29/as-solo-a-star-wars-story-flops-are-movies-about-white-men-box-office-poison/#4eec96a05d49

There were even 3,776 black slave owners in the American south right up until the Civil War:

Nyt anti-western/white: https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/921852359763951617

Democrat joking about white male suicide: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f57O1UKuh9w&app=desktop

Whites more likely than blacks to be killed by police: http://www.nber.org/papers/w22399?utm_campaign=ntw&utm_medium=email&utm_source=ntw

A psychotic, racist revenge fantasy seems like an excellent use of $40,000+ worth of taxpayer funding. I'm sure the majority-white theatre audience will get a deeply masochistic thrill paying top dollar for tickets to watch the simulated butchering of "white meat".

The play blends "high-octane stage action” with “heart-pumping visuals”. Actor Ash Flanders plays “every single white person she needs to kill”. “You’ll be laughing out loud one second, squirming in your seat the next,” it says. “Your white meat is DONE, motherf**ker.”

...Ms Lui received a $40,000 Australia Council grant for the show, produced by Redfern-based theatre company Performing Lines — which has received nearly $9 million in Australia Council grants since 2008. The NSW government’s Create NSW chipped in nearly $27,000 in 2015, while the Victorian government’s Australian Centre for the Moving Image provided in-kind support through access to its green-screen studio.

there are diversity quotas built into the purchasing departments of corporate America.

Google Instructed Managers that 'Individual Achievement' and ‘Objectivity’ Were Examples of ‘White Dominant Culture’

Professor told conservative student 'f--- your life,' video shows. There was more, student says

Critical Race Theory calls for “aggressive, color conscious efforts to change the way things are.” It contemplates, “race-conscious decision making as a routine, non-deviant mode, a more or less permanent norm” to be used in distributing positions of wealth, prestige, and power.

Critical Race Theory treats the idea of meritocracy—or the idea, in this context, that the law can and should treat all equally regardless of the color of their skin—as “a vehicle for self-interest, power, and privilege". This “myth of meritocracy” is merely a tool to perpetuate the existing power structures that are based on white supremacy and white privilege. Thus, the myth of meritocracy marginalizes people of color. The only alternative, then, is to use racial preferences to “delegitimize the property interest of whiteness—to dismantle the actual and expected privilege that has attended ‘white’ skin.”

Critical Race Theory “rejects the traditions of liberalism.”

http://archive.fo/iJLmS

Edit: "Three New Plaintiffs Join James Damore’s Discrimination Lawsuit Against Google"

http://archive.fo/KHkMP

Lawsuit: Google Reserves Jobs for ‘Diverse Individuals’ Only

"Ain't Nobody Got Time For This. For Real." 911 operator Crenshanda Williams sentenced for hanging up on thousands of emergency calls. Our tax dollars hard at work.

Science Teachers have to Combat ‘Whiteness’ in their Classrooms

https://squawker.org/culture-wars/black-woman-brags-about-giving-white-students-lower-grades-on-papers/

[SocJus] We've officially come full circle! Stamford Prof claims D&D playing is evil tools of White Patriarchy

In 2017 New York City, a 33% white city and President Trump's hometown, Non-Whites committed 93.1% of the murders and 97% of the nonfatal shootings

https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/8c08k1/socjus_college_hosts_nowhitesallowed_pool_party/

WHITES NEED NOT APPLY: Brits of English Heritage Banned from Paid Training Posts... at English Heritage

Referenced job advertisement https://www.historicengland.org.uk/services-skills/training-skills/work-based-training/paid-training-placements/

Archive from June 27, 2017 (still contains relevant information) https://web.archive.org/web/20170627065101/https://historicengland.org.uk/services-skills/training-skills/work-based-training/paid-training-placements/

Edit: archive site layout is different, but general content is the same

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/aug/04/affirmative-action-california-black-hispanic-students

I wonder if it will come up that Harvard is 26% Jewish and the Ivy league as a whole is 23% Jewish, despite Jews making up 2% of the population.

Ron Unz, himself Jewish, calculated based off National Merit numbers thay Jews make up only 6% of high achieving high school seniors and non Jewish Whites make up 70%.

Depsite this, non-Jewish Whites make up 18% of Harvard and 23% of the ivy league.

Harvard discriminates against Asians, but surely this is evidence that it discriminates against non-Jewish Whites too?

Thing is, Unz corrected for that Jewish IQ advantage (IQ is something he's also big on), see e.g. his "The Myth of American Meritocracy; How corrupt are Ivy League admissions?". This IQ advantage could of course explain a significant disparity, but not 2% to ~25%.

Black people with the lowest GPAs and MCAT scores are 2x as likely to get into med school than whites and Asians with average GPAs and MCAT scores, and 10x as likely as whites and Asians with similarly low scores. Fucking sad. Demand a white or Asian doctor!

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/53c68360e4b074eb167e705d/t/584f51c0e4fcb55ad4d39cf3/1481593316770/medical_school_acceptance_by_race_ethnicity?format=750w

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/03/19/upshot/race-class-white-and-black-men.html

study uses implicit bias test to measure racism which is a disproven test

study suggests no racism when it comes to black women vs. white women incarceration rate assuming same income

doesn’t account for single-motherhood

doesn’t account for higher black male crime rate

has nothing to do with racism and everything to do with black choices

“policies focused on improving the outcome of a single generation program are less likely to affect…

1) Black children penalized socially for “acting white” by their peers (black anti-white racism)

2) Communities that promote education are more likely to produce kids who value education and succeed

Genetics and sociology have long been in a tug of war, with advocacy for the primary fo fact and ideology by the former and the latter respectively. We have often heard that race is just a social construct by dogmatists, but how much truth is there to that when doctors have to take into account what someone's race is to give proper treatment?

I won't be able to abridge the article, since nearly all of it is so useful. Here you can find it without my commentary

.

David Reich, professor of genetics at Harvard University, argues that:

If scientists avoid discussing the topic candidly, racist theories will fill the vacuum.

And that's true enough. Let's look at some of the valuable things he has to say in his article (as well as some of the dubious things, which are rare).

Beginning in 1972, genetic findings began to be incorporated into this argument. That year, the geneticist Richard Lewontin published an important study of variation in protein types in blood. He grouped the human populations he analyzed into seven “races” — West Eurasians, Africans, East Asians, South Asians, Native Americans, Oceanians and Australians — and found that around 85 percent of variation in the protein types could be accounted for by variation within populations and “races,” and only 15 percent by variation across them. To the extent that there was variation among humans, he concluded, most of it was because of “differences between individuals.”

In this way, a consensus was established that among human populations there are no differences large enough to support the concept of “biological race.” Instead, it was argued, race is a “social construct,” a way of categorizing people that changes over time and across countries.

It is true that race is a social construct. It is also true, as Dr. Lewontin wrote, that human populations “are remarkably similar to each other” from a genetic point of view.

But over the years this consensus has morphed, seemingly without questioning, into an orthodoxy. The orthodoxy maintains that the average genetic differences among people grouped according to today’s racial terms are so trivial when it comes to any meaningful biological traits that those differences can be ignored.

This claim is not exactly incorrect: it's always important to judge people solely as individuals. But people have drawn rather extreme conclusions from it. The fact that there is more genetic variation within than between races in no way proves that race is not a valid category. There surely is more genetic difference within the two genders, but... oh damn, they don't believe that either.

I have deep sympathy for the concern that genetic discoveries could be misused to justify racism. But as a geneticist I also know that it is simply no longer possible to ignore average genetic differences among “races.”

Groundbreaking advances in DNA sequencing technology have been made over the last two decades. These advances enable us to measure with exquisite accuracy what fraction of an individual’s genetic ancestry traces back to, say, West Africa 500 years ago — before the mixing in the Americas of the West African and European gene pools that were almost completely isolated for the last 70,000 years. With the help of these tools, we are learning that while race may be a social construct, differences in genetic ancestry that happen to correlate to many of today’s racial constructs are real.

Recent genetic studies have demonstrated differences across populations not just in the genetic determinants of simple traits such as skin color, but also in more complex traits like bodily dimensions and susceptibility to diseases. For example, we now know that genetic factors help explain why northern Europeans are taller on average than southern Europeans, why multiple sclerosis is more common in European-Americans than in African-Americans, and why the reverse is true for end-stage kidney disease.

I am worried that well-meaning people who deny the possibility of substantial biological differences among human populations are digging themselves into an indefensible position, one that will not survive the onslaught of science. I am also worried that whatever discoveries are made — and we truly have no idea yet what they will be — will be cited as “scientific proof” that racist prejudices and agendas have been correct all along, and that those well-meaning people will not understand the science well enough to push back against these claims.

There could also be another reason to push back against this, namely that 'the noble lie' is not a way to deal with people who are relying on you for information. If there is an issue, tell us about it and properly contextualize it. Still, this is an improvement over the point of view that information about genetic differences will inevitably transform people into Hitlers.

Self-identified African-Americans turn out to derive, on average, about 80 percent of their genetic ancestry from enslaved Africans brought to America between the 16th and 19th centuries. My colleagues and I searched, in 1,597 African-American men with prostate cancer, for locations in the genome where the fraction of genes contributed by West African ancestors was larger than it was elsewhere in the genome. In 2006, we found exactly what we were looking for: a location in the genome with about 2.8 percent more African ancestry than the average.

When we looked in more detail, we found that this region contained at least seven independent risk factors for prostate cancer, all more common in West Africans. Our findings could fully account for the higher rate of prostate cancer in African-Americans than in European-Americans. We could conclude this because African-Americans who happen to have entirely European ancestry in this small section of their genomes had about the same risk for prostate cancer as random Europeans.

Did this research rely on terms like “African-American” and “European-American” that are socially constructed, and did it label segments of the genome as being probably “West African” or “European” in origin? Yes. Did this research identify real risk factors for disease that differ in frequency across those populations, leading to discoveries with the potential to improve health and save lives? Yes.

One could put it another way: political correctness costs lives.

While most people will agree that finding a genetic explanation for an elevated rate of disease is important, they often draw the line there. Finding genetic influences on a propensity for disease is one thing, they argue, but looking for such influences on behavior and cognition is another.

But whether we like it or not, that line has already been crossed. A recent study led by the economist Daniel Benjamin compiled information on the number of years of education from more than 400,000 people, almost all of whom were of European ancestry. After controlling for differences in socioeconomic background, he and his colleagues identified 74 genetic variations that are over-represented in genes known to be important in neurological development, each of which is incontrovertibly more common in Europeans with more years of education than in Europeans with fewer years of education.

It's good to have more information about specific genes, but of course, this won't be a surprise to anyone who knows anything about intelligence research. Intelligence is largely heritable. It has very weak correlations with non-adoptive parents. And while we all know about smart children born to stupid parents, that is not exactly the rule - correlation reigns supreme.

Is performance on an intelligence test or the number of years of school a person attends shaped by the way a person is brought up? Of course. But does it measure something having to do with some aspect of behavior or cognition? Almost certainly. And since all traits influenced by genetics are expected to differ across populations (because the frequencies of genetic variations are rarely exactly the same across populations), the genetic influences on behavior and cognition will differ across populations, too.

He is now entering very dangerous territory that got intelligence researcher Arthur Jensen and libertarian political scientist Charles Murray branded as 'white nationalists' by the Southern Poverty Law Center. I wonder why they are not branded as 'Asian nationalists' or 'Jewish nationalists' (they are not Jewish) for pointing out that whites are, on average, inferior in terms of intelligence compared to Asians and Ashkenazi Jews.

You will sometimes hear that any biological differences among populations are likely to be small, because humans have diverged too recently from common ancestors for substantial differences to have arisen under the pressure of natural selection. This is not true. The ancestors of East Asians, Europeans, West Africans and Australians were, until recently, almost completely isolated from one another for 40,000 years or longer, which is more than sufficient time for the forces of evolution to work. Indeed, the study led by Dr. Kong showed that in Iceland, there has been measurable genetic selection against the genetic variations that predict more years of education in that population just within the last century.

This was actually a surprise to me. Since so many fewer people die nowadays, I did not expect there to be that much selection pressure left.

He goes a bit off the rails and he starts ranting about 'racist stereotypes' allegedly promoted by Nicholas Wade and Nobel prize winner James Watson - apparently getting him fired, persecution him and forcing him to force his Nobel prize to get by was not sufficient.

To understand why it is so dangerous for geneticists and anthropologists to simply repeat the old consensus about human population differences, consider what kinds of voices are filling the void that our silence is creating. Nicholas Wade, a longtime science journalist for The New York Times, rightly notes in his 2014 book, “A Troublesome Inheritance: Genes, Race and Human History,” that modern research is challenging our thinking about the nature of human population differences. But he goes on to make the unfounded and irresponsible claim that this research is suggesting that genetic factors explain traditional stereotypes.

One of Mr. Wade’s key sources, for example, is the anthropologist Henry Harpending, who has asserted that people of sub-Saharan African ancestry have no propensity to work when they don’t have to because, he claims, they did not go through the type of natural selection for hard work in the last thousands of years that some Eurasians did. There is simply no scientific evidence to support this statement. Indeed, as 139 geneticists (including myself) pointed out in a letter to The New York Times about Mr. Wade’s book, there is no genetic evidence to back up any of the racist stereotypes he promotes.

This is very interesting. No such claim is made in the book that I can find. The only times when Harpending or his work is cited is when Jewish intelligence is discussed, as well as one of his quotes about whether or not human genetic differences are large or small. I wonder whether this is an attempt at guilt by association by Reich, and to very strongly suggest - without outright saying - that it's Wade echoing this claim.

At a meeting a few years later, Dr. Watson said to me and my fellow geneticist Beth Shapiro something to the effect of “When are you guys going to figure out why it is that you Jews are so much smarter than everyone else?” He asserted that Jews were high achievers because of genetic advantages conferred by thousands of years of natural selection to be scholars, and that East Asian students tended to be conformist because of selection for conformity in ancient Chinese society. (Contacted recently, Dr. Watson denied having made these statements, maintaining that they do not represent his views; Dr. Shapiro said that her recollection matched mine.)

In fact, I'll one-up you and say that it may be that the Chinese are more intelligence because of positive pressure from the examination system. If people are advantaged based on their ability to read and understand certain texts, then they will reproduce more than a place where you get an advantage by bashing each other's skull in, like most of medieval Europe for that matter. Of course, this is hardly a bulletproof hypothesis, as this does not explain why the Japanese and Koreans are also more intelligent than whites (on average), when they did not have the examination system.

If scientists can be confident of anything, it is that whatever we currently believe about the genetic nature of differences among populations is most likely wrong. For example, my laboratory discovered in 2016, based on our sequencing of ancient human genomes, that “whites” are not derived from a population that existed from time immemorial, as some people believe. Instead, “whites” represent a mixture of four ancient populations that lived 10,000 years ago and were each as different from one another as Europeans and East Asians are today.

This is interesting. One of them must lack a soul, and be overrepresented among Gallic populations.

For me, a natural response to the challenge is to learn from the example of the biological differences that exist between males and females. The differences between the sexes are far more profound than those that exist among human populations, reflecting more than 100 million years of evolution and adaptation. Males and females differ by huge tracts of genetic material — a Y chromosome that males have and that females don’t, and a second X chromosome that females have and males don’t.

This comes about 2/3 into the article. Reich is rather lucky, because today the claim that females have a second X-chromosome is very controversial. Not to mention the fact that we are a sexually dimorphic species.

Most everyone accepts that the biological differences between males and females are profound. In addition to anatomical differences, men and women exhibit average differences in size and physical strength. (There are also average differences in temperament and behavior, though there are important unresolved questions about the extent to which these differences are influenced by social expectations and upbringing.)

You can see this guy is from the hard sciences. He does not often encounter the delusional lunatics we do.

How do we accommodate the biological differences between men and women? I think the answer is obvious: We should both recognize that genetic differences between males and females exist and we should accord each sex the same freedoms and opportunities regardless of those differences.

The same freedoms and opportunities. I think everyone sane agrees with that.

It is clear from the inequities that persist between women and men in our society that fulfilling these aspirations in practice is a challenge.

Note that he says inequities and not inequalities. I'm not entirely sure what he's talking about, but I don't think he necessarily supports the idea that any difference in outcome is necessarily an inequity - that would be ridiculous considering he himself points out that there differences between XX and XY are massive and enormous. And they are.

An abiding challenge for our civilization is to treat each human being as an individual and to empower all people, regardless of what hand they are dealt from the deck of life. Compared with the enormous differences that exist among individuals, differences among populations are on average many times smaller, so it should be only a modest challenge to accommodate a reality in which the average genetic contributions to human traits differ.

It is important to face whatever science will reveal without prejudging the outcome and with the confidence that we can be mature enough to handle any findings. Arguing that no substantial differences among human populations are possible will only invite the racist misuse of genetics that we wish to avoid.

http://archive.is/0l8Eo

https://www.reddit.com/r/recruitinghell/comments/85sk5a/as_a_white_man_i_was_promised_that_the_government/

Aye. Similarly so, in US: "Middle school caught giving students 'white privilege' survey"

https://www.sott.net/article/372456-Middle-school-caught-giving-students-white-privilege-survey

Also, for teachers in one of those: "Confronting racism in classrooms"

http://preview.ibb.co/ha5ma7/5a99a0cd1e000008087ad4fc.png

But, speaking of Canada... "University to host ‘It’s OK to be (Against) White(ness)’ event"

http://archive.fo/Ikb2l

Edit: Hmm, "Expressions of institutional racism from middle school students"

https://www.commercialappeal.com/story/opinion/contributors/2018/02/09/expressions-institutional-racism-middle-school-students/312023002/

And...

"For the second time in recent months, principal Adrian Harries of Nichols Middle School in Evanston, Ill., instructed his staff to segregate themselves by race. His emails directed the “white” staff to room 126 and the “staff of color” to room 226. The basis for these segregated staff meetings was a racial-equity agenda calling for “courageous conversations” in which staff members could discuss their “racial awakening[s].”

https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/03/illinois-public-school-segregated-staff-meetings-equity-education-agenda/

https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/839he7/student_barred_from_religious_studies_class_that/

White South Africans Denied Refugee Status in Canada

Denied... by Canada's Somali refugee immigration minister who also accused them of white supremacy. You can't make this shit up.

https://nationalvanguard.org/2018/03/white-south-africans-denied-refugee-status-in-canada/

https://www.postandcourier.com/politics/chuck-schumer-votes-against-south-carolina-federal-judge-nominee-because/article_8b9f1890-1d6b-11e8-8533-0f7cc33319a9.html

Minorities and women get advantage in government contracts: https://www.sba.gov/offices/headquarters/ogc_and_bd/resources/14309

WSJ: YouTube Hiring for Some Positions Excluded White and Asian Males, Lawsuit Says

http://archive.is/OPbpS

Texas students launch 'No Whites Allowed' magazine: "Equality is just more cishet white supremacist patriarchy trying to write the narrative."

https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=10580

Transgender model who said 'all white people are racist' appointed as Labour adviser: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2018/02/27/labour-hires-transgender-model-said-white-people-racist-advisor/

Mr Malema has been leading calls for land confiscation, forcing the ANC to follow suit out of fear of losing the support of poorer black voters. In 2016, he told supporters he was “not calling for the slaughter of white people‚ at least for now”.

So interesting that, according to Pew, from 2009 to 2017, the % of Dems who believe "black people cant get ahead because of racial discrimination" jumped from 28% to 64% -- all during Obama's presidency.

http://newobserveronline.com/baltimore-businesses-collapsing-under-black-crime-plague/

>Increasing numbers of commercial businesses in the black overrun city of Baltimore, Maryland, are closing up and fleeing in the wake of an 88 percent increase in commercial robberies in that metropole, it has emerged.

>The homicide rate in the 71 percent non-white city surged to a record 343 killings in 2017, which works out at 56 killings per 100,000 people. Baltimore has about 615,000 inhabitants.

>Police in the city attributed the overwhelming majority of Baltimore’s crime to “gangs, drugs and illegal guns.”

>Another report revealed that the black criminals have increasingly turned their attention to robbing the city’s remaining commercial businesses, and that such crime has risen 88 percent in the last five years, from 560 commercial robberies in 2013 to more than 1,000 last year.

>According to the report, business owners “are also complaining of threats outside their stores: drug dealing, intimidation, stabbings and shootings.”

>Cailey Locklair Tolle, president of the Maryland Retailers Association, was quoted as explaining that that a lot of her organization’s members “don’t relocate. It’s a massive endeavor. A lot of times they just go out of business.”

>A CBS News “Murder map of Deadliest U.S. cities” revealed that Baltimore is officially the second most deadly city in the US, beaten only by equally black St. Louis, Missouri—which was also the scene of massive anti-white riots.

>Third most deadly city on the CBS map was black overrun New Orleans, Louisiana, and Detroit comes in fourth.

https://businessinsider.com/south-africa-cyril-ramaphosa-wants-to-confiscate-white-farmers-land-2018-2

Anti-white coursework: http://archive.fo/anuhU

Remind them also that blacks did not rise up and earn their freedom, the white man had to hand it to them (like everything else)

And remind them that white people are THE ONLY RACE ON EARTH who not only stopped their own slave trade, but went around the world fighting in countries to stop THEIR slave trades as well.

As is true in humans, chimpanzees’ general intelligence is correlated to their ability to exert self-control and delay gratification, according to new research, which finding relates back to the famous “marshmallow test,” an experiment originally performed at Stanford University in the 1960s.:

http://news.gsu.edu/2018/02/08/chimpanzee-self-control-related-intelligence-georgia-state-study-finds/

Whites Need Not Apply: Canadian University Excludes Whites from Senior Management Position

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/02/16/canadian-university-excludes-whites-senior-management-position/

Rape:

College women are far less likely to be raped than their working class counterparts

http://www.weeklystandard.com/college-women-are-far-less-likely-to-be-raped-than-their-working-class-counterparts/article/2010925

Rape Investigation Handbook

Ultimately, we are left to conclude that there is no published study or data to support any claim that the false rape allegation rate is or was ever down around 2%; not anywhere, even from those who cited that number originally. Rather, it comes from a judge giving a speech to some attorneys almost 40 years ago whose source has, to date, not been identiﬁed or confirmed.

It is not inappropriate to suggest that it is time we move forward and away from the citation of this figure to more contemporary and reliable scientiﬁc data.

Published Research: There has been some research specific to the area of falsely reported rapes, resulting in published figures ranging from 8 to 41%:

1. MacDonald (1973) provided false report rates for 1968: they were 18% nationwide and 25% in Denver, Colorado

2. Greenfield (1997), quoting US. Bureau of Justice Statistics, provided a nationwide false report rate of 8% in 1995 and 15% in 1997

3. Brown and colleagues (1997) conducted research to address the issue of genital injury in female sexual assault victims presenting to the San Luis Obispo General Hospital emergency room in California between 1985 and 1993. Their study revealed a false report rate of just over 13%, involving women who ultimately removed themselves from the research being conducted

4. Kanin (1994), in his study of an unnamed Midwestern city in the United States, revealed a 41% false report rate.

5. Kennedy and Witkowski (2000), in their attempt to replicate the Kanin study in a suburb of Detroit, found a false report rate of 32% between 1988 and 1997.

6. In April 2002, Her Majesty’s Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate and Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary published ”A Report on the Joint Inspection into the Investigation and Prosecution of Cases Involving Allegations of Rape.” The report revealed that, out of 1379 cases studied, 11.8% were false reports.

7. Lea and associates (2003) gathered data in a constabulary in the southwest of England from 1996 to 2000, They revealed an 11% false report rate.

8. Jordan (2004) studied police rape and sexual assault files in New Zealand The study revealed a false report rate of 41%.

These numbers, while varying by location and year, combine to suggest that false reports of rape are not rare, but common. The authors are not suggesting that these numbers be used predicatively to infer that false reporting is more or less likely in a given case. Rather, we are suggesting that this illustrates the need for due process and impartial investigations in cases of alleged sexual assault.

John O. Savino; Brent E. Turvey (23 August 2011). Rape Investigation Handbook. Academic Press. p. 276. ISBN 978-0-12-386030-9.

Bias in Tech:

Google Search Manipulation Can Swing Nearly 80 Percent of Undecided Voters

Silicon Valley ‘Actively Trying to Blacklist’ Conservatives ‘Through Some Hiring Engines’

https://www.scribd.com/document/368688363/James-Damore-vs-Google-Class-Action-Lawsuit#fullscreen&from_embed

Some of the things from Damore's lawsuit, if verified as being true, are pretty awful.

The lawsuit allegations include:

• Google brought in Ruth Porat and Eileen Naughton for the weekly "TGIF meeting" on March 30, 2017. During this event, either Porat/Naughton shamed the departments within Google where less than half of the workforce was made up of women (bullet point 30).

• At the "Diversity and Inclusion Summit", Google stated their definition of "diverse": Women who were not Caucasian or Asian (bullet point 36).

• After the aforementioned summit, Google held "Diversity Training", which was split into two parts: Online course, and in-person training. In-person training was known as "Bias Busting", which discussed the existence of white male privilege in the workplace as well as biases against women (bullet point 60).

• George Sadlier, a Director at Google, mass-emailed Google to condemn Damore's memo as "repulsive and intellectually dishonest". Damore received an email the following day from Alex Hidalgo, calling him "a misogynist and a terrible person" and threatened to hound him "until one [of them was] fired. Fuck you" (bullet point 67).

• Chuck Wu, Senior Director of Engineering for Google, terminated Damore's employment for "perpetuating gender stereotypes" in his memo. Damore attempted to explain why this was unlawful, and Meghana Rao, from Google HR, stated that there would be no discussion (bullet point 72).

• The Google Recognition Team awarded "Peer Bonuses", usually reserved for outstanding work performances, to people who argued against Damore's political views. One email received by Simone Wu congratulated her for “speaking up for googley values and promoting [diversity and inclusion] in the wretched hive of scum and villainy that is [Damore’s Memo].” (bullet points 74-76).

• High-ranking SRE Director Colm Buckley stated that "there are certain "alternative views, including different political views" which he "intend[ed] to silence" because they are "violently offensive" (bullet point 77).

• David Gudeman was called to Google HR after responding to Kim Burchett's document "Derailing", which discussed how people might try to silence others opinions, supposedly aimed at white Caucasian males. He was issued a verbal warning for "attempting to stand up to Caucasian males and his conservative views" (bullet points 80-89)

• Gudeman had a conversation with a Google employee shortly after Trump's election victory. He complained "about being a conservative and a Trump supporter", pointing out that his kind were "a hated and despised minority at Google". He was accused of gaslighting. Gudeman was later terminated over comments about Sarmad Gilani, in which Google accused him of accusing Gilani of terrorism. (bullet points 101-104)

• A Site Reliability Manager discovered that one of Google's employees supported Trump. The employee later expressed concerns about the mistreatment of conservatives by Google, at which the SRM stormed off. Months later, the SRM falsely accused him of participating in a doxxing campaign in order to sabotage his annual performance review. He later emailed all 80000 employees to brag about this meeting. Though these threats were reported to Google HR, Google did not make the manager apologize or retract his threats. The same manager repeated some threats to bloggers in support of Damore, and Google did nothing. (bullet points 113-122).

• Adam Fletcher, Jame McGuire and Nori Heikkinen, all SRE Managers, publicly endorsed blacklisting conservatives from employement opportunities at Google (bullet point 128)

• Conservative blogger Curtis Yarvin, who reportedly advised Steve Bannon, entered the Google office to have lunch with an employee. Apparently, his presence triggered a silent alarm, and security personnel escorted him off. Other conservative personalities, including Alex Jones, were on this blacklist. One employee asked Google HR to have these people removed. HR responded by blocking the blacklist's contents from everybody. (bullet points 149-151).

• Two conservative Googlers criticized a feminist blog post in mid-2015. Andy Carrel suggested that "we should just try laying off these people". Others, such as Chris Lewis, called them "poisonous assholes". Google HR received these name-calls, and claimed that they were not policy violations. (bullet point 152-155)

• Liz Fong-Jones, an SRE Manager, discriminated against white men, claiming she "could care less about being 'unfair' to" them. Others joined in in support of her. (bullet point 156)

• Exhibit B provides a collection of anti-conservative postings (page 74-111), a collection of "Google endorsing political violence" (page 112-119). A lot of "punch a Nazi" comments which, of course, compare Trump supporters to Nazis and implies that it's an excuse to punch them. There's a meme that says "If you want to increase diversity at Google, fire all the bigoted white men", a comment that says "The only way we "move past color" in America is for white people to shut up and listen". There's also a collection of anti-Caucasian postings (page 120-134) and reactions to Damore's memo (page 135-151)

Google Leftists 'Dig Through a Private Conservative Mailing List' to Get People Fired: https://thegoldwater.com/news/19188-Google-Leftists-Dig-Through-a-Private-Conservative-Mailing-List-to-Get-People-Fired

Twitter censors conservatives, declares patriots “bots”, shadow bans people based on ideology (Project Veritas): https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/7powct/ethics_project_veritas_twitter_engineers_to_ban_a/

Oxford study shows digital marketing and tech firms much more polarized towards the left-wing extreme: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qBKes1n5yc

Bias in traditional media:

[Ethics]/[Opinion] Quillette: "Is Political Diversity on the Op-Ed Page Worth Defending?" Calls out censorship of conservative/libertarian voices and refutes the "no such thing as liberal bias" narrative.

https://imgur.com/a/7COOG

Pew: US media bias ranks worst in the world

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/pew-us-media-bias-ranks-worst-in-the-world/article/2645644

Impact of Fake News grossly overexaggerated: https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/measuring-reach-fake-news-and-online-disinformation-europe

University stuff:

How Politically Biased Are Universities? New Study Finds It's Far Worse Than Anybody Thought.

More U.S. College Students Say Campus Climate Deters Speech

Professor told conservative student 'f--- your life,' video shows. There was more, student says

“Bias” incidents (funny): http://archive.fo/V50CM

Male student sues Dartmouth College for expelling him for "putting another student at risk of physical harm" during the sexual encounter female student initiated while he was severely intoxicated: https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=10424

20 years @ 15 percent: does Harvard discriminate against Asian-Americans?:

http://infoproc.blogspot.com/2014/11/20-years-15-percent-does-harvard.html

China:

Satellite data strongly suggests that China, Russia and other authoritarian countries are fudging their GDP reports

China, Russia and other authoritarian countries inflate their official GDP figures by anywhere from 15 to 30 percent in a given year, according to a new analysis of a quarter-century of satellite data.

The working paper, by Luis R. Martinez of the University of Chicago, also found that authoritarian regimes are especially likely to artificially boost their gross domestic product numbers in the years before elections, and that the differences in GDP reporting between authoritarian and non-authoritarian countries can't be explained by structural factors, such as urbanization, composition of the economy or access to electricity.

Oh, no, they don't fudge their numbers; they flat out make them up.

From a 2015 article in US news and world Report:

China's own premier has previously said he's far from confident in the country's GDP estimates, calling them "man-made" and unreliable, according to a leaked document from 2007 obtained by WikiLeaks. He said government data releases, especially the GDP numbers, should be used "for reference only."

Lot of folks in geopolitics have been saying that about China for years. Its a country with a population of a billion citizens with standards of living of a third world country The Average Median Income in China is about same as Libya or Nicaragua. That's half the working population (mostly rural workers) making about $2000 a year, a standard of living not significantly distinguishable from Ghana. And the wealth gap is a particular danger because, like at every period of growth in Chinese history, its all concentrated at the coasts and the further inland you get the more like it is to travel back in time. This isn't like going from San Francisco, California to Grant's Pass, Oregon where you can expect to find first world standards of living in either case (just with fewer luxuries in the interior). No country that size with a wealth disparity that significant is making the kind of money they say they are. Its entirely possible that Japan is still the second largest economy on Earth, and if they aren't right now, they will be when the next recession comes and China's economic and social problems become a lot harder to hide.

25 March, 1959, Jinjiang Hotel Shanghai. see minutes of meeting of the Communist Party. This is very famous quote, And the Party is not ashamed of it.

"It is better that half of China die, so the other half can have their fill"—Mao Zedong

http://www.newsweek.com/chinese-military-power-us-might-643022

Clinton sold military tech to China and China also sold it to Pakistan

Also during his presidency the Chinese got hold of all of Americas Neutron bomb and Nuclear Warhead technology https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_Cox_Report_controversy

He also gave them satellite technology, effectively allowing them to develop ballistic missiles for the warheads https://mobile.nytimes.com/1999/05/11/world/clinton-approves-technology-transfer-to-china.html?referer=

He also gave them top secret silent submarine propeller technology in exchange for campaign donations. And they were given anti submarine and laser tech too

During 0bamas presidency China got hold of a list of US spies operating in China and promptly had them all shot or imprisoned http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-39989142

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1996_United_States_campaign_finance_controversy

https://www.hoover.org/research/missile-deception

https://www.lawfareblog.com/why-opm-hack-far-worse-you-imagine

https://www.reddit.com/r/China/comments/89oaqr/here_is_how_chinas_propaganda_reaches_washington/

By 2020, China will have completed its nationwide facial recognition and surveillance network, achieving near-total surveillance of urban residents, including in their homes via smart TVs and smartphones.

an authoritarian technocracy?

Not a real thing. We're talking about the government that spent $300 million on this

bridge. You think farmers building roads with shovels and wheelbarrows need a $300 million suspension bridge? That money could have been spent far more productively than building something that will never get used. Not coincidentally, the officials that okayed the project are now in prison for corruption.

This is the government that loudly proclaims its ban on coal!.... then walked it back a few months later when it became clear they couldn't enforce it without people freezing to death in the winter.

This is the government that loudly proclaimed a full employment guarantee to all Tibetan university graduates!... then had to walk it back when the program became too expensive to continue.

This is the country that loudly proclaimed that its citizens would be allowed freedom of movement within its borders, a freedom enjoyed by practically every country on earth except for China!... then had to walk it back when they realized they couldn't handle it.

We're talking about an incredibly corrupt and still largely ideologically leftist country. It's not a technocracy in any way.

Surveys: 60 percent of Chinese men cheat on partners, domestic violence cited in 15 percent of divorce cases: https://supchina.com/2018/03/28/surveys-say-that-about-60-percent-of-chinese-men-cheat-on-their-partners-domestic-violence-cited-in-15-percent-of-divorce-cases/

Infrastructure stuff: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1609/1609.00415.pdf

China’s broken WTO promises: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTRANETTRADE/Resources/Gertler.pdf

http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/APCITY/UNPAN002123.pdf

http://www.businessinsider.com/china-threat-to-america-fbi-director-warns-2018-2

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-credit/china-to-bar-people-with-bad-social-credit-from-planes-trains-idUSKCN1GS10S

Beijing police order limit on foreigners in pizza bars and cafes

https://sc.mp/2p9313D

For those who don’t know how much China fucks us, (well, everyone) a Chinese customer buying a Tesla pays an extra 50% in taxes. Tesla is cutting that in half by building a plant in one of China’s economic development zones, but they will still be subject to a 25% import tax.

The only way to avoid this (for any foreign company) is through a joint venture with a Chinese company, which means Tesla would have to share their intellectual properties and technology with Chinese partners, as well as dropping “Tesla” for a Chinese name.

Provinces cook their GDP numbers, faking them up to 40% increases: http://www.scmp.com/news/china/economy/article/2127206/chinas-inner-mongolia-admits-cooking-economic-data-puts-key-road

Why so many Chinese people want to come to the U.S.: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/if-china-is-doing-so-well-why-do-so-many-chinese-want-to-move-here/2012/11/16/b139e2e2-284d-11e2-96b6-8e6a7524553f_story.html?utm_term=.0e903b70e7ca

China forces U.S. companies to hand over intellectual property/IP rights as a cost of doing business there:

http://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/2128837/donald-trump-considering-big-fine-over-china

Chinese students do well on tests that require rote memorization, and I would say this is true for most of the East Asian countries. They’re really good at regurgitating information. But they have a hard time coming up with their own creative ideas. This is why Americans who say we are falling behind Asia in education are misguided. We should follow the methods of European countries like Finland, which is ranked very highly on par with East Asia.

EDIT: Since I apparently need to say this. It is a factual statement to say that East Asian countries rely on rote memorization.

Sources:

Again, this is just quick research on my phone. But the point still stands and it’s not racist as one commenter said below.

1) https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/dont-go-overboard-praising-chinas-schools/2014/02/09/bbd51248-8edc-11e3-b227-12a45d109e03_story.html?utm_term=.27cfe1262a0d

2) https://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/education/dont-copy-asia-on-rote-learning-schools-told/news-story/ffc663483187d93e490d75e747f305c0?sv=4f369e660b3db9a87682a5cc10099cb8

3) https://thediplomat.com/2012/05/what-finland-can-teach-china/

4) http://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-asia-china-20521422/relaxed-vs-strict-which-type-of-education-is-best

48

40% of foreign correspondents working in China says conditions have deteriorated, 50% were harassed or intimidated, a quarter had sources threatened. Dropbox link to FCCC report

https://www.dropbox.com/s/95ghn59rl93ceu9/Access%20Denied-FCCC%20report%202017.pdf?dl=0

Chinese government dumps solar tech: https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/Press/fs/201%20FactSheet.pdf

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-01-17/china-said-to-test-facial-recognition-fence-in-muslim-heavy-area

More Than 120,000 Uighurs Being Held in 'Re-Education Camps' in China: https://article.wn.com/view/2018/01/25/RFA_More_Than_120000_Uighurs_Being_Held_in_ReEducation_Camps/

“Oppression”:

there were only like 25k natives left in 1920, and that with their population crashing that hard from Cook's arrival in 1778 until that point,

“nature documentary”: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xe6wB1_Hx-0

New paper: any exam benefits of going to grammar/private school (vs. state school) disappear once you adjust for genetics, prior ability, and social class: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41539-018-0019-8 …

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41539-018-0019-8

No, There’s No Evidence of a Murder Wave Targeting Gay Americans

http://quillette.com/2018/02/11/no-theres-no-evidence-murder-wave-targeting-gay-americans/

Study finds that minority and female judges display "ingroup favoritism," but not white or male judges. http://sci-hub.tv/http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1065912918761008 …

http://quillette.com/2018/02/07/real-gender-trouble/

I love how every time these idiots talk about "privilege" its always used as a weapon against white people and men. Meanwhile it sure is fuck aint white people who have affirmative action, race based grants and race segregated clubs because when whites do it its "racist". Same thing with gender. Women are far more privileged in western society. They get a hand up in every aspect of life, are given women only grants and provided women only spaces. They are greatly benefited in the eyes of the law being treated as first class citizens over men and have several rights that men do not. They have shelters and help lines and yet we are constantly told to think of the women more and more.

Males comprise 50% of the population but make up 93% of the prison population. Need even more evidence systemic sexism exists?

Oh wait men commit more crime

Just like blacks

Native Americans, Genocide is too strong a term. But there were actions that might constitute acts of genocide or ethnic cleansing. We do have evidence of extreme violence from before Columbus. Archeologists have found mass graves and burial sites where the bones show obvious signs of trauma from arrows or axes. Plenty of tribes would go around raiding and wiping out other people or stealing their meager belongings. The Comanches and Apaches were pretty nasty towards anyone near them. The Aztecs would enslave people and use war captives in ritual sacrifices. People found giant piles of skulls in Mesoamerica. Natives in the Pacific Northwest would take prisoners of war and use them as slaves. Scalping, stealing women, revenge killing, mutilation, and burning people were all common tactics for certain Natives. At the same time some were much more peaceful and passive towards neighbors, others were far more warlike. Random attacks on peaceful settlers are not modern myths.

The Europeans essentially broke millennia old stalemates. Some tribes that traded with the Europeans for guns took them and completely wiped out their enemies, or forced them out of the eastern woodlands onto the prairies. A middle of the road estimate of the population of the Americas in 1500 would be around 57 million. Its now pretty well established that Old World diseases caused a 75-95% population die off after the initial contact with the Spanish.

The Spanish were probably too few in numbers to have committed a genocide against the people of the Caribbean. We have written records of people going out and killing natives for fun or using them in forced labor. Columbus was actually fired as the Governor of the Indies by the Spanish crown and briefly spent time in jail because of his brutality. But we also have good evidence that Old World diseases the natives had no immunity to were what did the job. Measles, mumps, influenza, black plague, smallpox and fever ravaged across the continent in multiple waves. Indeed, there is only one confirmed instance in all the history of the New Wold of Europeans trying to intentionally infect natives with smallpox.

Saying the whites committed a genocide is also probably too strong. Forced relocations, forced sterilizations, attempts at slavery(which almost always failed), and random attacks by settlers on peaceful people would probably constitute acts of genocide, but there never seemed to be an overarching national goal to terminate indigenous people. By the time the Indian Wars were over the US census bureau estimated that the data toll on both sides was about 30-45,000. Most of the "wars" were brief skirmishes between either militias and the US military and some local natives that would result in a few hundred deaths.

Poor people typically have bad spending habits. No one denies that, when adjusting for their salary, that some costs exceed those of higher income simply due to lower salary = higher cost distributions on equal services. But even outside of that, low income populations still usually spend outside of a budget, gamble more often, consume more tobacco and alcohol, don't put anything into savings, do more "spontaneous purchases," and consume luxuries outside of their means. While it's a whole other topic to make that into a criticism or psychological analysis in any way, I'd say these are some absolute behavioral correlations.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blanchard%27s_transsexualism_typology

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transvestic_fetishism

https://archive.fo/0vAKv (transgender f2m on steroids beats all female competition (really funny))

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/02/17/report-modern-culture-is-not-just-revealing-transgenders-it-is-creating-them/

% of welfare recipients who are black the same as the % who are white: http://thewestsidegazette.com/finally-the-truth-about-welfare-how-many-blacks-vs-how-many-whites/

Censorship:

Pew Research: 55% of people say too many people are “easily offended” over the language others us