The right ideas in the wrong hands? (Image: Paul Hobson/FLPA)

We now know that gene activity can change significantly without changes to DNA – but did a shamed scientist who killed himself in 1926 get there first?

WHEN Paul Kammerer shot himself on an Austrian hillside in 1926, he seemed destined to be remembered only as a scientific fraudster who had faked his results to prove a controversial theory. In fact, he might well have glimpsed epigenetics, influential changes in gene activity that do not involve alterations to the DNA sequence.

Kammerer was infamous for his experiments on the midwife toad, Alytes obstetricans (pictured above), an unusual amphibian which mates and raises its eggs on dry land. By keeping toads in unusually hot, dry conditions, he drove them to breed and raise their eggs in water. Only a few eggs hatched, but the offspring of these aquatic unions also bred in water. Kammerer claimed this as proof of Lamarckian inheritance – the idea (now known to be wrong) that traits acquired during an individual’s lifetime can be passed on to its offspring.

In August 1926, Kammerer was condemned as a fraud in the pages of Nature (vol 118, p 518). He killed himself six weeks later. The sad story was largely forgotten until 1971, when Arthur Koestler published a book claiming that the biologist’s experiments may have been tampered with by a Nazi sympathiser. Kammerer was a socialist who was planning to build an institute in the Soviet Union, which would have made him a target of Vienna’s burgeoning Nazi movement.

Then, last year, biologist Alex Vargas of the University of …