Those Republicans united in opposition to Donald Trump’s candidacy pulled off the perfect victory in the April 5 Republican primary in Wisconsin. Through a combination of paid and earned media and successful rallying behind Sen. Ted Cruz as the alternate candidate—rather than splitting votes between him and Ohio Gov. John Kasich—the anti-Trump apparatus was able to keep the GOP front-runner’s support ceilinged to 35 percent, roughly the same number he was polling at when there were still six candidates in the race. It was a humiliating loss for Trump, and the one that finally taught him to at least marginally watch his mouth (and his retweets).

The Cruz campaign has since tried to spin Wisconsin as a “turning point” in the race, or the moment when the Republican Party united behind him to block Trump’s path to the nomination. Like most spin, this isn’t entirely the case. It’s true that Trump’s near-shutout in delegates in the state hampered his ability to reach the 1,237 bound delegates he needs to secure the nomination, and his fate now probably hinges on corralling some number of unbound delegates. But the idea that this signaled a shift in “momentum” in the race toward Cruz is much less evidence-based. Throughout this back-and-forth primary calendar we haven’t seen shifts in “momentum” so much as shifts in geography.

And now that the race has shifted to the Northeast for the remainder of April, the anti-Trumpers are back exactly where they were before Wisconsin: with a split vote that allows Trump to clean house.

Trump is going to win the New York primary on Tuesday. No one ever doubted that. What will be important to watch, though, is whether he can break 50 percent statewide and in each congressional district to exceed winner-take-all thresholds and capture nearly all of the state’s 95 delegates. He looks in decent shape to reach the magic number statewide, and Wednesday’s Siena College poll showed his support to be fairly consistent geographically: He’s at 56 percent in New York City, 52 percent in downstate suburbs, and 48 percent upstate. As BuzzFeed reports, anti-Trump spending groups aren’t even bothering with New York anymore.

Trump is going to dominate on April 26, too. Connecticut (28 delegates) has a 50 percent winner-take-all threshold statewide and plurality winner-take-all rules by congressional district. A new Emerson College poll finds Trump at 50 percent and leading in all five congressional districts. Trump is similarly taking command in Maryland (38 delegates) although John Kasich might be able to pluck a couple of moderate, well-educated districts in the D.C. suburbs. Meanwhile, a Monmouth University survey released Wednesday shows Trump picking up 58 percent of Maryland’s “very conservative” voters—usually Cruz’s best demographic, which tells you all you need to know about his chances for Maryland pickups. Trump will almost certainly win Pennsylvania’s 17 bound statewide delegates; its unbound district delegates are a more complicated matter. Rhode Island’s 19 delegates are proportionally allocated and though there hasn’t been any recent polling, Trump will likely end up with a plurality. Delaware is a pure winner-take-all state with 16 delegates. It has not been polled because no one respects Delaware. Poor Delaware! It will either be Trump or Kasich and probably not Kasich, because Kasich can’t win any state besides Ohio.

The pattern in all these states is similar: Trump gets his plurality—or, especially the closer you get to New York, his majority—while neither of his rivals can emerge as a viable anti-Trump horse, and so they fumble around with 15 to 30 percent each.

The anti-Trump thinking behind Kasich continuing his campaign after he won Ohio on March 15 and the rest of the field cleared out was twofold. First, he’s incredibly stubborn and wanted to stay in, so it was the only option. Second, the Northeast is hardly Cruz territory, in part because the Cruz campaign casts the region’s hub as home to god-stabbing gay abortionists as part of its (effective) heartland messaging. So the plan was to divvy up the work: Cruz would serve as the anti-Trump alternative between the coasts—a role he has so far successfully filled—Kasich would be the anti-Trump vehicle for Northeastern hedonists, and then they could figure out the complex California situation later. Kasich hasn’t been able to take care of his end.

The Ohio governor is doing better than Cruz in Northeastern states, just not by enough. Kasich may be a better regional fit than Cruz, but he’s also not as strong of a presidential candidate. At this point, it’s still useful on net for Kasich to stay in just to help keep Trump below various 50-percent thresholds. But the split field makes it nearly impossible for Trump to lose much of anything in the region. The only anti-Trump strategy that genuinely would have helped in the Northeast would have been for Kasich to appeal more to Republican primary voters from the beginning, and that just wasn’t happening.

Read more Slate coverage of the GOP primary.