Cracking the Reddit Code

September 30, 2013

If you browse Reddit at all, once in a while you’ll see /r/TheRedPill or /r/RedPillWomen referenced as a punchline or a joke of a sort. I’m not an atheist, but /r/Atheism suffered the same fate for being too zealous and “cringe-inducing” as we’d say.

Why are these communities singled out? Because Reddit does not tolerate anyone taking themselves seriously. Whenever you say something that is too srs biz for them, you get mob-downvoted in spite of mentioning it, and you become an easy target to troll and satirize.

Not that any of that matters, but I think that /r/TheRedPill is largely a waste of time because of how the community regards boards that may appear self-important: It’s the nature of Reddit.

If you think it’s stupid and they should accept /r/TheRedPill, then Reddit is simply not for you, and I can respect you for feeling that way. It can easily be a place full of negativity and apathy.

So what’s the key to the code?

Okay, so let’s say you want to stick around the lion’s den.

Unless you are posting cat pictures or video game related memes, Reddit only accepts you if you are making great, humorous fun at the expense of someone else’s stupidity, or in this case, pointing out someone else’s glaring character defects as expressed on their personal Tumblelogs.

Anything that can be ridiculed is readily accepted at Reddit so long as it stands in the name of common sense and nothing that can be construed as an overt agenda of any sort. The other upside is that it’s hard to satirize satire so your perspective automatically has the upper hand in terms of its representation.

See /r/TumblrInAction for a shining example of a “quasi-redpill” community which humbly has no mission other than to mock the politically-correct, social-justice-based stupidity found at Tumblr and elsewhere. I check on it once a day whenever I have time, and it’s simply hilarious. Sometimes it’s hard to tell that some people they mention are being completely serious.

The community doesn’t go full “red pill” which is refreshing. Rather they have a level-headed look at things which I appreciate very much, and because of this reach a wider audience that the other communities would otherwise be unable to.

They acknowledge the large Internet contingent of “Feminists” or “Social Justice Warriors” as they are affectionately called suffer from an inability to handle any reasoning outside of the walled garden echo chamber that is Tumblr.

Also, thanks to /r/TumblrInAction I found out that the shrill harpy lady attacking the MRAs in that infamous protest video is known as “Big Red” and that AVfM used her image to make flyers. (Good for you guys.)

Also, according to the comments in that thread it is revealed that she laughed at someone who brought up the issue of male suicide:

This little ditty she sang was never mentioned to any of the mainstream pro-SJW/femcunt rags like Jizzabel who lauded her for being obnoxious and having a bad hair day. Not that Jizzabel would care: they’d probably hamster around their glaring mistake before ever admitting to it.

One redditor had this to say about her:

Sounds to me like her daddy was a little too close to her or something. This kind of hatred towards an entire gender is NOT normal.

Want more Pill Scout? Be sure to subscribe to PillScout.com for great information about supplements and nutrition to enhance your lifestyle.