If there’s a surefire way to get Chicago Bears fans upset, it’s to disrespect third-year quarterback Mitchell Trubisky. And that’s exactly what EA Sports did in this year’s edition of “Madden.”

EA Sports published the complete “Madden NFL 20” player rating database today, and Trubisky’s was shockingly low among starting quarterbacks. His 75 overall checks in at 27th among starting QBs.

Let’s put this into perspective, shall we?

Trubisky’s 75 is worse than the following quarterbacks entering the 2019 season: Ryan Fitzpatrick (Dolphins), Jameis Winston (Buccaneers), Lamar Jackson (Ravens) and Nick Foles (Eagles).

Trubisky even ranks lower than Alex Smith, who isn’t slated to play in 2019 (if ever again).

Marcus Mariota (Titans), Derek Carr (Raiders) and Andy Dalton (Bengals) are all preferred options in the game.

Look, I get it. Trubisky had some frustrating moments last season and wasn’t the most consistent passer in the league. But for his “Madden” rating to be lower than those of guys like Dalton and Mariota, two players whom their teams are ready to move on from, is an insult to Trubisky.

It’s especially insulting considering the pace Trubisky was on before injuring his shoulder midway through the season. Had he stayed healthy all year, Trubisky would’ve rewritten the Bears’ record books and has already provided Chicago with more hope than any quarterback since Jim McMahon.

And, no, this isn’t a homer take either. Trubisky took a massive step forward in his development from his rookie season to last year, and there’s no reason to expect anything less than the same kind of jump in 2019. With Matt Nagy’s offense now fully implemented and Trubisky at the point where he’s teaching it to younger players rather than trying to learn it himself, the sky’s the limit.

And that alone warrants a rating higher than 75.