I am not sure i would blame the defense for that result. On the first goal, It was Pozuelo (i think) who made the poor decision to pass to Gonzales who was in a vulnerable position to receive the ball. On the second goal, the central defender got to the ball and cleared it with a header (as you are expected to do). It fell to the foot of Yow who made a terrific play with a one-touch volley. Other than clearing the ball behind the goal line, which would have conceded a corner, that was best play that the defender could do. TFC played well enough to win that game. They were able to find and create lots of space in the attacking areas and the DC defense was not that good. But too often TFC would squander chances by making one pass too many. Or one touch too many. Or trying to get to cute in the attacking third. For this result, i would put more of the blame on the attacking players rather than the defending players. Edit: another thought. If you compare the defending by TFC’s opponents in the last two games (DCU versus Montreal). There is no question in my mind that Montreal had better structure and better talent in that area of the game. Whereas DCU was terrible. So what was the difference? One supposed bad pass by Camacho. There were others on the pitch for Montreal who could have done something to mitigate the risk and consequences of what resulted. Which proves that good defending is far more than that one brain cramp that you might have every 5-10 games. Good defending is athleticism but also about consistency, positioning, anticipating etc. the kind of things most people wont notice. Success is measured in percentages. It also is team thing, not just the central defenders. This argument ties into my otherr points as to why i still think that Doneil Henry should still be in the pitture for the starting 11 in WCQ.