Near the end of Cal's 50-43 win against Texas, Cal running back Vic Enwere fumbled at the Texas 1-yard line and it appeared to be recovered by Texas. The Big 12 officiating crew ruled there was "no immediate recovery" and awarded the call to Cal. Below are comments from Big 12 referee Mike Defee about the play: Kyle Bonagura, ESPN.com, serving as the pool reporter: Was there an inadvertent whistle that affected the ruling on the field? Defee: "There wasn't an inadvertent whistle. The ruling on the field was a touchdown, which replay determined that there was a fumble at the 1-yard line. The ball rolled into the end zone, came to rest, Cal players ran past it and many Texas players ran past it. I think it was 14 [Texas DB Dylan Haines] that picked up the ball and handed the ball to the official. Replay determined that there was no immediate recovery and that is replay's sole responsibility. We ruled touchdown. He has video evidence that the ball was fumbled short of the goal line. Once he determines there was no immediate recovery, by rule, the ball is returned to the team last in possession at the spot of the fumble, which is the 1-yard line." Bonagura: How do you determine what constitutes an immediate recovery? Is it a time frame? Is it a judgement? Defee: "Again, it's completely a judgement call through a lot of study with the replay official and, again, in his determination, again, based on what I just told you. Again, I haven't seen anything. It's his interpretation that the ball rolled into the end zone, came to a stop, Cal players ran past it, Texas players ran past it, then 14 picked it up and handed it to the official. So, he was ruling that there was a time element there that constituted no immediate recovery. Therefore, by rule, the ball goes back to the team that was last in possession at the 1-yard line." "Just to be clear, not an inadvertent whistle. A ruling of touchdown. Video evidence to the contrary in the judgement of no immediate recovery and, therefore, by rule, the ball goes back." Bonagura: To clarify, if a player had jumped on it immediately – even if the play was ruled a touchdown – that would have constituted an immediate recovery and he could have, technically, regained possession for Texas? "Yes, yes. Again, immediate recovery is the judgement of the replay official, but he's got to have – judgement based on his description to me, there was significant time elapsed between the time he picked it up that the player, No. 14, picked it up and handed it to the official."