British Columbia is the worst place to be in Canada if you’re a child, and it has been for all but one of the past 13 years.

The latest numbers released by Statistics Canada indicate that in 2011, British Columbia once again slipped into last place among the provinces, tied at the bottom with Manitoba.

It meant that 93,000 B.C. children lived in families whose incomes were below the low-income cut-off, known as the LICO.

Reversing more than a decade of failed public policy regarding children that persisted through good times and bad is the biggest challenge to Premier Christy Clark’s family-friendly agenda.

But it’s not solely the fault of the provincial government. So, change must come not only in Victoria.

The federal government shares the blame and not only for failing to live up to the unanimously approved resolution in 1989 that Canada would end child poverty by 2000.

But to understand this requires going through some numbers.

The poverty line in Vancouver in 2011 was $36,504 for a family of four and $23,498 for a lone parent with one child.

In 2011, Metro Vancouver had Canada’s highest housing costs — average rents that year ranged from $984 to $1,181 a month. So it’s no surprise so many parents struggled to make ends meet.

And it continues. Last year, Canada Mortgage and Housing reported that average rents rose at more than three times the inflation rate, while some people’s rose even more because the allowable rental increase was 4.3 per cent.

One in four children with a single mother lived in poverty in 2011.

The spike in poverty among female-led, lone-parent families tracked a dramatic fall in their median income. In a single year, it fell to $21,500 from $32,000.

Nearly one in 10 of B.C.’s poor kids have two parents.

Statistics Canada didn’t provide any deeper analysis of poor families. But, a study released last month by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives and Save the Children does.

Its findings, based on 2006 census data, are shocking and point to an unofficial apartheid that aboriginal people have long complained of.

They explain why going to an Indian reserve in Canada feels like entering a foreign country.

Half of all First Nations kids live in poverty. In Manitoba and Saskatchewan, the rate jumps to nearly two-thirds. In B.C., which is the third worst, one in three aboriginal children live in poverty.

Yet, the report garnered little attention from media or, one suspects, from governments.

What’s even more striking is the disparity between First Nations kids and the lucky kids.

The lucky ones are the kids who have Canadian-born, Caucasian parents. Their chance of living in poverty is one in 12. If these were the only kids living here, Canada would out-perform every other country when it comes to child poverty.

But add in the not-so-lucky ones and Canada sits at 25 among 30 countries in the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.

It’s here where the federal government bears responsibility.

Between 1996 and 2006, transfers for social services, health care, education and welfare to on-reserve First Nations children increased by two per cent each year — or just over 21 per cent in total. The population increased 29 per cent during the same period.