Under the Radar Blog Archives Select Date… August, 2020 July, 2020 June, 2020 May, 2020 April, 2020 March, 2020 February, 2020 January, 2020 December, 2019 November, 2019 October, 2019 September, 2019

Feds move to block discovery in NSA lawsuits

The Justice Department moved Wednesday night to block the plaintiffs in the most successful legal challenges to the National Security Agency's call-tracking program from obtaining more details about how the surveillance effort operates.

In a motion filed with U.S. District Court Judge Richard Leon, government lawyers asked the judge to halt further proceedings before him while appeals go forward in a pair of lawsuits brought by conservative legal activist Larry Klayman. The suits led last month to Leon's landmark ruling that the NSA's call database, aimed at making it easier for the government to trace leads in potential terrorism cases, likely violated the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

"Even if the mere collection of information about Plaintiffs’ communications constitutes a Fourth Amendment search...conclusively resolving the reasonableness of that search ultimately could risk or require disclosure of exceptionally sensitive and classified intelligence information regarding the nature and scope of the international terrorist threat to the United States, and the role that the NSA’s intelligence-gathering activities have played in meeting that threat," the government motion states.

(Also on POLITICO: Klayman: 'We hit the mother lode')

"Plaintiffs have made clear their intentions to seek discovery of this kind of still-classified information, concerning targets and subjects, participating providers, and other operational details of the challenged NSA intelligence programs," the motion (posted here) adds. "Contentious litigation over the availability of classified information to litigate these cases against the Government Defendants, and the significant risks to national security if such information were disclosed, could and should be avoided by allowing the Court of Appeals to rule first on the legal viability of Plaintiffs’ claims against the Government Defendants."

Klayman's past litigation has been known for being as impactful and sometimes more impactful in the discovery phase, where lawyers demand documents and conduct depositions, as in its ultimate outcome. So, the government's desire to head that process off for now, and perhaps entirely, is understandable.

Klayman didn't immediately respond to an e-mail seeking comment for this item, but made clear in an interview last month that he was eager to start demanding information on the NSA's surveillance efforts.

(Also on POLITICO: Klayman in huge CNN smackdown)

"We’re heading to discovery. We’ve got an entree into the NSA,” he crowed just after Leon issued his ruling determining that the mass collection of phone data was probably unconstitutional. The conclusion led Leon to order a halt to NSA's gathering of phone data on Klayman and one of his clients, but the judge halted that part of his order pending appeal.

The new government filing also underscores a still unresolved aspect of the NSA call-tracking effort: just how comprehensive it is.

"Although the Government has acknowledged that the program involves the collection and aggregation of a large volume of data from multiple providers, it has not represented in this litigation, nor does the record contain any representations by the Government, that the program captures information about all (or even virtually all) telephone calls to, from, or within the United States," the Justice Department lawyers wrote.

The motion goes on to point to a declassified Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court order from August that stated: "production of all call detail records of all persons in the United States has never occurred under this program."

(Also on POLITICO: 10 best political feuds of 2013)

While not noted in the new motion, a report from an outside group President Barack Obama tapped to examine surveillance efforts added more granularity about the program to the public record last month. "The meta-data captured by the program covers only a portion of the records of only a few telephone service providers,” the Review Group report said.

Follow @politico