Subham Das 1272 days ago

(2) wanting a job in the IT sector, the results end up in average candidate, who can perform better tomorrow, but currently lack experience, getting only 15-20k/month. Now with time they get better, irrespective of the branch / College they graduated from, but their salary increase is a minimal of 5-10%, just think about it, 5-10% of 15-20K, how much would that be, is that justified? This results in candidate leaving the organisation looking for a better salary, and then comes the real picture, the HR at the organisation you are being interviewed asks you why do you want to change the job, as if they have not gone through that situation, and to top that off, a 3 month notice period, and organisation following policies like, s max of 30% hike is possible on your current salary. Just think about it, all those calculations looks good for someone with 6-8 LPA, but not on 15-20K/month. So finally I would like to conclude, if things should be standardised, they should be justifiable at all angles, if not don't standardised. May be standardised at lower granularity. One more thing, it's easy to point at others, first try to be in their shoes and then comment, If they don't pay this talented guys with a justified salary, they would look for a job elsewhere. Hence I believe, it's justified to pay 15-20 LPA also, consider the quality of work and talent.