Summary:

The SFOX Multi-Factor Market Index has moved from uncertain to mildly bullish as of July 9th, 2019.

Facebook’s Project Libra took center stage, highlighting both institutional interest in crypto and the persistent use case of bitcoin as a decentralized currency.

Rumors of bitcoin’s current volatility have been exaggerated: we’re actually experiencing a downward trend in bitcoin’s volatility peaks since 2017.

LedgerX and ErisX were approved by the CFTC to offer physically settled bitcoin futures contracts, indicating crypto’s continued financial maturation.

Bitcoin’s performance during the Fourth of July appears to provide a further data point for SFOX’s thesis that bitcoin appears, at least anecdotally, to have a positive relationship with holidays during bull runs.

Watch for Senate/Congressional hearings, new innovations in futures, and updates to major blockchain protocols to potentially impact the crypto market in the coming month.

In the June 2019 edition of our monthly volatility report, the SFOX research team has collected price, volume, and volatility data from eight major exchanges and liquidity providers to analyze the global performance of 6 leading cryptoassets — BTC, ETH, BCH, LTC, BSV, and ETC — all of which are available for algorithmic trading on our trading platform.

The following is a report and analysis of their volatility, price correlations, and further development in the last month. (For more information on data sources and methodology, please consult the appendix at the end of the report.)

Note: In order to better report and analyze the entirety of the continued crypto rally, the team at SFOX has extended the period this report covers from the beginning of June through July 9th.

Current Crypto Market Outlook: Mildly Bullish

Based on our calculations and analyses, the SFOX Multi-Factor Market Index, which was set at uncertain at the beginning of June 2019, has been moved to mildly bullish as of July 9th, 2019.

We determine the monthly value of this index by using proprietary, quantifiable indicators to analyze three market factors: price momentum, market sentiment, and continued advancement of the sector. It is calculated using a proprietary formula that combines quantified data on search traffic, blockchain transactions, and moving averages. The index ranges from highly bearish to highly bullish.

It’s evident that the price of bitcoin has been rallying over the past month, but in terms of the overall market conditions, it’s critical to separate what the data are telling us from what trader psychology (in particular, FOMO) may be telling us. Sustained trends in large-scale institutional development, renewed attention from the retail market, and long-term price indicators give us reason to assess the current climate as mildly bullish.

Analysis of June & Early July 2019 Crypto Performance

June 2019 marked the beginning of an upswing in crypto — particularly, an upswing in the price to buy bitcoin — that has only been surpassed in magnitude, to date, by the crypto bull run in November and December of 2017. The similarities and differences between the current 2019 rally and the 2017 rally underscore how far the crypto sector has developed since then — and how much further it has yet to go.

Facebook announced the details of its cryptocurrency Project Libra, which signaled the interest of major companies in crypto and coincided with the beginning of the current rally (June 18th).

On Tuesday, June 18th, Facebook announced details of a new cryptocurrency platform they are developing, backed by a consortium of tech companies such as Uber and Booking.com which stand to benefit significantly from a decentralized, lower-fee payment solution. In the eight days following that announcement, the price to buy bitcoin increased over 39%, from $9121.67 to a peak of $12703.75. While it’s still far too early to fully evaluate the impact of even the mere announcement of Project Libra, it appears to have potentially impacted the crypto sector in two seemingly opposed, positive ways: on the one hand, the announcement reinforced that major companies are willing to invest in crypto-centric enterprises; on the other hand, the announcement may have reinvigorated interest in bitcoin specifically as a cryptographic, decentralized currency that is outside the control of any singular entity, such as the giant Facebook.

Bitcoin’s 30-day historical volatility cleared 80% for the first time since last December — but it’s far from being “more volatile than ever” (June 30th).

In recent history, BTC has been less volatile than other cryptoassets; that trend has reversed during the current rally, with its 30-day historical volatility leading the pack in terms of cryptoasset volatility at 81% on June 30th, climbing to a current value of 89.13% as of July 9th. While this is noteworthy and has been hailed by CNN as the most volatile time in Bitcoin’s history, it doesn’t come close to the volatility that bitcoin saw during the winter rally of 2017:

The macrotrend of bitcoin’s volatility peaks decreasing since December 2017 highlights that better trading infrastructure and liquidity may, in fact, be stabilizing bitcoin and other major cryptoassets, relatively speaking, leading to the continued maturation of crypto as an asset class.

LedgerX and ErisX received approval from the CFTC to offer physically settled bitcoin futures (June 25th; July 1st).

The crypto market’s financial infrastructure continued to mature as two derivatives providers were approved to offer physically settled bitcoin futures contracts. Regulated financial instruments such as these offer traders and institutions more opportunities for entering the crypto space, signaling the further maturation of crypto as an asset class.

The Fourth of July saw a bump in bitcoin’s price, reinforcing the view that major holidays falling on bull runs may potentially correspond to temporary boosts in bitcoin’s price.

Earlier this month, SFOX published a research note detailing how, anecdotally, on holidays that occur during crypto bull runs (e.g., Thanksgiving, Christmas, and New Year’s Eve 2017), bitcoin’s price has experienced a temporary bump, potentially in part due to growing retail market awareness coupled with fear of missing out, or FOMO. The Fourth of July appeared to fit that trend: on the holiday, the price of BTC climbed from $11,389.39 to $11,677.47, only to drop back to $11,114.11 on July 5th.

What to Watch in the Rest of July 2019

Look to these events as potentially moving the volatility indices of BTC, ETH, BCH, LTC, BSV, and ETC in the remainder of July and early August:

Senate and House meetings on Facebook and Project Libra (July 16th — 17th).

This coming Tuesday, David Marcus, the head of Facebook’s Calibra wallet, is set to testify before the U.S. Senate Banking Committee on Project Libra; the House Financial Services Committee has a hearing on Libra scheduled for the following day. These hearings constitute just one part of the U.S. government’s current inquiries into “Big Tech”: Facebook will also join Apple, Amazon, and Google in sending representatives to appear before the House Antitrust Subcommittee on July 16th. Given what close attention the crypto market paid to Libra’s announcement, these close inquiries into Libra, along with any subsequent action taken by either the government or Facebook, could potentially impact crypto as well.

Bakkt initiating user acceptance testing for physically settled bitcoin futures via ICE (July 22nd).

Backed by major institutions like Microsoft and Starbucks, Intercontinental Exchange startup Bakkt has been discussed for the better part of the last year as a potential way to broaden institutional access to crypto markets. Even if the testing phase of their bitcoin futures product doesn’t immediately lead to an uptick in institutional entry, the crypto market may potentially react simply by virtue of paying close attention to Bakkt’s overall development. LedgerX and ErisX have both also recently received approval to offer physically settled bitcoin futures contracts, though neither has a firm rollout timeline yet.

Default block size cap of Bitcoin SV increased to 2 GB (July 24th).

In accordance with their broader scaling philosophy, the Bitcoin SV community will be increasing Bitcoin SV’s default block size limit to 2 GB in a protocol upgrade scheduled for July 24th. Up to the present, BTC-led crypto rally, BSV exhibited uniquely high volatility, potentially due to the contentious debate about whether BSV affiliate Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakomoto. A major protocol upgrade could potentially contribute renewed volatility to the cryptoasset.

Crypto volatility typically moves around the time of futures expirations. With CBOE having backed off from BTC futures for the time being, the date of the CME’s futures expirations may potentially impact volatility more than usual.

Litecoin block reward size cut in half (August 5th).

One of the factors that SFOX previously cited as potentially contributing to Litecoin’s strong performance in the first half of 2019 is the upcoming “halvening event,” which will reduce the amount of LTC rewarded for each new Litecoin block mined from 25 LTC to 12.5 LTC. While the market may have already priced in this upcoming decrease in the rate of new LTC added to the total supply of LTC, it’s theoretically possible that LTC could see further volatility as the event grows even closer.

Get the SFOX edge in volatile times through our proprietary algorithms directly from your SFOX account.

The Details: June 2019 Crypto Price, Volatility, and Correlation Data

Price Performance: A Bitcoin-Dominated Rally

Bitcoin is the headline of the ongoing crypto rally. The largest cryptocurrency by market cap opened June 2019 at a price of $8542.45; as of July 9th, it had risen to a price of $12490.74.

For greater graphical clarity on the rest of the market, see the following price chart omitting BTC and the S&P 500:

As of July 9th, BTC/USD led all asset pairs tracked by our report in month-over-month growth at 57.81%. ETH/USD followed with 26.94% month-over-month growth, with gold in third place at 11.01% — compared with 3.49% for the S&P 500. Ethereum Classic had the distinction of being the only asset tracked by our report with negative month-over-month growth as of the 9th (-5.95%).

For greater graphical clarity, see this additional chart tracking only the month-over-month changes in the prices of BTC, ETH, gold, and the S&P 500:

Volatility: Riding Bitcoin’s Waves By looking at the 30-day historical volatilities of BTC, ETH, BCH, LTC, BSV, and ETC, we see that the volatility of most major cryptoassets formed a relatively tight band that saw a sharp uptick on June 26th — the day BTC challenged the $13,000 price barrier. This increase in volatility may be related to the expiration of BTC futures contracts on June 28th, especially because these expirations included BitMEX’s quarterly contract. The exception to the general volatility trend was Bitcoin SV, whose outsized volatility decreased throughout the month to more closely align with the rest of the market; this may potentially be a consequence of debate over Craight Wright being overshadowed by broader market news such as Facebook’s Project Libra and BTC’s rally.

By looking at the 30-day historical volatilities of ETH, BCH, LTC, BSV, and ETC as a percentage of BTC’s 30-day historical volatility, we can see more clearly that most altcoin volatility was following BTC’s volatility, with BSV starting to follow BTC near the end of June.

Price Correlations: Bitcoin Positivity

BTC’s 30-day price correlations with ETH and BCH were both relatively positive as of July 9th. In contrast, BTC has an unusually negative correlation with Litecoin. This reinforces the narrative that, throughout 2019, Litecoin may be establishing itself as an asset with fundamentals independent of Bitcoin.

For a full crypto correlations matrix, see the following chart:

Interestingly, whereas BTC’s correlations with the S&P 500 and gold were nearly -1 in May, these correlations were both positive in the past month. This may be the result of all three of these assets currently being in a risk-on environment, with Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell hinting at an interest rate cut and the New York Federal Reserve’s recession indicator reportedly being at the highest level since 2008.

For a more complete look at BTC’s correlations with other assets throughout the past five weeks, see the following graph:

Appendix: Data Sources, Definitions, and Methodology

We use two different in-house volatility indices in creating these reports:

1. 30-day historical volatility (HV) indices are calculated from daily snapshots over the relevant 30-day period using the formula:

30-Day HV Index = σ(Ln(P1/P0), Ln(P2/P1), …, Ln(P30/P29)) * √(365)

2. Daily historical volatility (HV) indices are calculated from 1440 snapshots over the relevant 24-hour period using the formula:

Daily HV Index = σ(Ln(P1/P0), Ln(P2/P1), …, Ln(P1440/P1439))* √(1440)

S&P 500 performance data are collected from Yahoo! Finance using GSPC (S&P 500 Index) data. Gold performance data are collected from Yahoo! Finance using XAU (Philadelphia Gold and Silver Index) data.

The cryptoasset data sources aggregated for crypto prices, correlations, and volatility indices presented and analyzed in this report are the following eight exchanges, the order-book data of which we collect and store in real time:

bitFlyer

Binance

Bitstamp

Bittrex

Coinbase

Gemini

itBit

Kraken

Our indices’ integration of data from multiple top liquidity providers offers a more holistic view of the crypto market’s minute-to-minute movement. There are two problems with looking to any single liquidity provider for marketwide data:

Different liquidity providers experience widely varying trade volumes. For example: according to CoinMarketCap, Binance saw over $20 billion USD in trading volume in November 2018, whereas Bitstamp saw $2 billion USD in trading volume in that same time — an order-of-magnitude difference. Therefore, treating any single liquidity provider’s data as representative of the overall market is myopic. Liquidity providers routinely experience interruptions in data collection. For instance, virtually every exchange undergoes regularly scheduled maintenance at one point or another, at which point their order books are unavailable and they therefore have no market data to collect or report. At best, this can prevent analysts from getting a full picture of market performance; at worst, it can make it virtually impossible to build metrics such as historical volatility indices.

Building volatility indices that collect real-time data from many distinct liquidity providers mitigates both of these problems: collecting and averaging data from different sources prevents any single source from having an outsized impact on our view of the market, and it also allows us to still have data for analysis even if one or two of those sources experience interruptions. We use five redundant data collection mechanisms for each exchange in order to ensure that our data collection will remain uninterrupted even in the event of multiple failures.

The above references an opinion and is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as and does not constitute investment advice, and is not an offer to buy or sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any cryptocurrency, security, product, service or investment. Seek a duly licensed professional for investment advice. The information provided here or in any communication containing a link to this site is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to law or regulation or which would subject SFOX, Inc. or its affiliates to any registration requirement within such jurisdiction or country. Neither the information, nor any opinion contained in this site constitutes a solicitation or offer by SFOX, Inc. or its affiliates to buy or sell any cryptocurrencies, securities, futures, options or other financial instruments or provide any investment advice or service.