I ask everyone who comes across this text to read it with an open mind, leaving personal beliefs and coin favoritisms aside for a few minutes. Let’s assume we can be wrong; we are all humans after all.





The current confrontation going on in the Bitcoin community is hurting us more than we think. Bitcoin users are divided between two chains with a different vision about the best way to scale Bitcoin in the future, when adoption has increased to a decent percentage of our population; that is the wrong way to look at Bitcoin’s future and is causing us to ignore the real issue at hand. The real enemy is the system that allows intermediaries to largely be in control of our lives and fate. Bitcoin was born to take this massive power away from those in control of the oppressive fiat currency system, the central banks.





Bitcoin was invented by Satoshi Nakamoto as a gift to all Mankind , and it was to be the tool that would allow us to have sovereignty and control of our wealth, taking down the system that the financial institutions use to oppress us. This is the very reason why blockchain cryptocurrencies were born.

Today Satoshi is you, me, him and her. We create our future by making choices, and it is of the utmost importance that we choose right.





Every time we don’t reach consensus regarding what the future of Bitcoin is, we have a hard fork and the chain splits. Contrary to popular belief, hard forks are not a bad thing; a hard fork is an expression of freedom. Whenever there is a hard fork, Mankind is free to choose what Bitcoin really is, and we all have to do in-depth research so that we can think for ourselves which of the chains best represents the Bitcoin concept and so that we don’t have our opinion severely influenced by media. Most of us know that mass-media feeds the public with the information that those who are in its control want to broadcast, and the ones in power are the ones who control the media. As we have seen many times in our history, mainstream news are a channel often used for political propaganda.





At present, we have one important choice to make: what Bitcoin really is. Despite the fact that a great percentage of the people involved in Bitcoin nowadays are only looking to gain wealth over time, we shouldn’t forget that Satoshi’s goal was for ALL of Mankind to have financial sovereignty and true freedom. Let’s not lose track of that; we need to be critical thinkers and not let a selfish financial motive dictate what Bitcoin really should be.





Whether you share a libertarian philosophy or not, central banks and a few families in power have been in control of the monetary supply for decades, and monetary control is a means of mass-scale manipulation and slavery in a way. The only logical thing those in power would have done after first hearing about Bitcoin, was to study a way to destroy it with all means necessary before it spiraled out of control and made them lose their position. It is sensible to think that if they found the way to set the current system up, after nine years since Bitcoin’s birth, they currently most likely are executing an already orchestrated plan.





Today we know that one the main shareholders of Blockstream – the company who employs most of bitcoin BTC’s developers – is the AXA group, whose CEO is the charmain of the Bilderberg group(1). Bitfinex with its (allegedly) tether fraud is also an investor in Blockstream, and while the theories going around about Bitfinex might just be conspiracy theories, they definitely give food for thought. Furthermore, after the recent censorship and manipulation of public opinion scandal in which BTC developers have been involved, together with Adam Back offering weird solutions for BTC scaling in the short term, having mixed feelings and being skeptic about BTC’s developers is not only understandable but reasonable.

We need to ask ourselves the following question: why would financial institutions invest and have shares in a company – the only one – in charge of developing the tool that intends to make them lose their privileged position in the first place? History tells us there’s a decent possibility that it might be in order to be able to pull the strings and sabotage Bitcoin’s evolution from within – a “Man In The Core” attack.





By arguing and fighting about the long term viability of different scaling solutions and worrying about having less decentralization if computational needs increase over the years, we are just getting distracted and dividing up . We need to have some faith in Mankind, both in ourselves and in the next generation, to come up with the most decentralized and efficient solutions when the time comes – today we have to focus on the real issue at hand.

The name of the game is beating the oppressive central banking system, the system behind fiat inflation and economic crises that affect humankind’s life.





One of the few things that we know for sure at this point is the following: one of the two cryptocurrencies today labeled as “bitcoin” is developed by a company who has bankers behind; the other has multiple independent development teams “competing” in order to produce the best possible solutions for Bitcoin’s future, offering them for the market to decide which one it wants to adopt. The latter one is also supported by some original Bitcoin developers.





Let’s not forget that Bitcoin was born as an open source project by Satoshi for The People. We need to keep it that way and we cannot afford getting distracted from the main goal of every human on this planet having the reigns of his/her own life.