Download raw source

Delivered-To: john.podesta@gmail.com Received: by 10.52.171.43 with SMTP id ar11cs11662vdc; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 07:00:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.61.96 with SMTP id s32mr1503129qch.46.1321542012762; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 07:00:12 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: <Justin@presidentclinton.com> Received: from mail.clintonemail.com (ool-18bbeabb.static.optonline.net. [24.187.234.187]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s9si7534958qcy.155.2011.11.17.07.00.12 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 17 Nov 2011 07:00:12 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 24.187.234.187 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of Justin@presidentclinton.com) client-ip=24.187.234.187; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 24.187.234.187 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of Justin@presidentclinton.com) smtp.mail=Justin@presidentclinton.com Received: from CLNTINET08.clinton.local ([fe80::3c3c:8a15:4320:37a9]) by CLNTINET08.clinton.local ([fe80::3c3c:8a15:4320:37a9%11]) with mapi; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:00:12 -0500 From: Justin Cooper <Justin@presidentclinton.com> To: Doug Band <doug@presidentclinton.com> CC: "john.podesta@gmail.com" <john.podesta@gmail.com>, "jpodesta@americanprogress.org" <jpodesta@americanprogress.org>, "cheryl.mills@gmail.com" <cheryl.mills@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:00:10 -0500 Subject: Re: Thread-Index: AcylOZqAY9qKMXLaRLmFYfkwfuybvg== Message-ID: <10845169-24A2-4B97-93A5-2BE5B307D23B@presidentclinton.com> References: <786762D781A7FF4FAC9060892B40448822792CF48F@CLNTINET08.clinton.local> In-Reply-To: <786762D781A7FF4FAC9060892B40448822792CF48F@CLNTINET08.clinton.local> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 I have to agree. I think there WJC may have some real serious conflicts if we start to make = too many rules. It may be time to update some procedures but we can not ignore the nexus of= WJC's life. On Nov 17, 2011, at 9:50 AM, Doug Band wrote: > Also > I signed a conflict of interest policy as a board member of cgi > On it, I wrote that my wife designs bags for cgi, and loses money doing s= o plus donating her time > And that teneo represents 4 cgi sponsors, 3 of which teneo brought to cgi > . > Oddly, wjc does not have to sign such a document even though he is person= ally paid by 3 cgi sponsors, gets many expensive gifts from them, some that= are at home etc >=20 > I could add 500 different examples of things like this and while I remove= d lasry bc they are all on the offense, I get the sense that they are tryin= g to put some sort of wrong doing on me after the audit as a crutch to chan= ge things and if I don't mention things like lasry where they all have issu= es, I may regret it >=20 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Doug Band > Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 09:39 AM > To: 'john.podesta@gmail.com' <john.podesta@gmail.com>; 'jpodesta@american= progress.org' <jpodesta@americanprogress.org> > Cc: 'cheryl.mills@gmail.com' <cheryl.mills@gmail.com>; Justin Cooper > Subject: Re: >=20 > Apologies > I know I stalled on this=20 > But I would like to get this out by cob today >=20 > Pls let me know if you have comments asap > Thx >=20 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Doug Band > Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 04:46 PM > To: John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com> > Cc: Cheryl Mills Mills <cheryl.mills@gmail.com>; Justin Cooper > Subject:=20 >=20 > attached is a draft reflecting Jon's suggestions > i removed he lasry section all together >=20 > im not sure that i put the memo in order pursuant to the section rearrang= ement > so if i didn't, it was unintentional >=20 > any further recommendations are appreciated as i think this is a very imp= ortant document >=20 > i would like to get it to them tomorrow or as soon as possible so please = let me know your thoughts >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20