Several watchdog sites for news and information have rocked their readers with the revelation recently that key officials of the FBI may have manipulated or altered investigative reports and documents to put a fraud over on Congress, the American people, and the world. For a rarefied roundup, read these fine articles:

Senate Investigators Suspect FBI Documents Were Manipulated By Deputy Director Andrew McCabe…

Disgraced FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe altered his summary of Mike Flynn interview

Those who have read my 2016 exposé Watergate: The Hoax are not the least bit surprised, because the FBI criminality today is the exact same modus operandi that was used in the early 1970s to put a massive fraud called “Watergate” over on Congress, the American people, and the world.

These handprints today are the exact same bloody handprints that were all over “Watergate.”

The motive today is the exact same traitorous motive as in “Watergate”: to frame and overthrow a duly elected President of the United States.

The personnel may have changed, but the fundamental criminality of the FBI and the CIA hasn’t.

In fact, the fiction that most of the world still believes as “Watergate” never could have existed at all without willful, malicious collusion between the FBI, the DOJ, the CIA, and the CIA’s barking-mad lapdogs in the media. Sound familiar?

One infamous example, exhaustively documented in Watergate: The Hoax, is the FBI’s deliberate deception of Congress and the courts about the whereabouts and activities, on crucial dates, of “former” FBI agent Alfred Baldwin III—the man who supposedly sat huddled in the Howard Johnson motel eavesdropping on Democratic National Committee headquarters, and scratching out “logs” or “notes” of conversations he supposedly listened to. (He didn’t.)

At all relevant times, Baldwin was being paid by, and was under the direction of, “former” CIA agent James McCord. Baldwin and McCord both were plants inside Nixon’s re-election campaign, one from the FBI, one from the CIA (sound familiar?), working on behalf of CIA to frame Nixon for a “crime” that never happened at all. Here is an excerpt from Watergate: The Hoax, exposing the malign and intentional sabotage by the FBI of information that would have blown the entire “Watergate” fraud into a twinkling cloud, had the truth ever been discovered by honest triers of fact in Congress or the public:

Alfred Baldwin entered a warp of space and time that made Watergate a stranger fiction than any fantasy ever dreamed up by Rod Serling or Lewis Carroll. There’s nothing to do but turn it over to the claims of Baldwin himself, this quote from the L. A. Times:

On May 24, after about two weeks of covering demonstrations, I visited my home in Hamden. When I returned to Washington the next day, I found Jim McCord in Room 419 surrounded by an array of electronic equipment.

If Baldwin returned to DC “the next day” after going to Hamden on Wednesday, 24 May, then he returned on Thursday, 25 May, driving his car from Connecticut, about six hours away. That’s also what he told the FBI: that he “returned to Washington, DC, on May 25, 1972,” and “parked his vehicle in the basement of the Howard Johnson’s motel.” [FBI Report of 19 July 1972 by SA Angelo J. Lano, Washington, D.C., Field Of ce File No. 139-166, Bureau File #139-4089, Section A, “Alfred Carleton Baldwin, III.”] According to Baldwin’s story to the L.A. Times, on that same night, the night of 25 May:

From the balcony outside Room 419, I watched McCord walk across Virginia Ave. and enter the Watergate complex. Subsequently he appeared at a window of the Democratic offices and I could see at least one other person and perhaps two with him.

McCord later returned to the motel room and said, “We’ve got the units over there.” He began adjusting the monitoring unit.

This is all very exciting spooky spy Watergate break-in stuff—but there’s a major problem: According to interviews conducted by the FBI, Alfred Baldwin dropped his car off for servicing at Branhaven Chrysler-Plymouth, just outside of New Haven, Connecticut, “early in the morning of May 25.” The company’s vice president, John LaVallee, told the FBI that Baldwin didn’t pick the car up until “approximately 9:00 p.m.” on Thursday evening, 25 May. [FBI Report of 22 June 1972 by SAs George S. Phillips and Stephen J. Slifka, at Branford, Connecticut, File # NH 139-74]

It therefore is categorically impossible for Alfred Baldwin to have seen or done any of the things he says he saw or did in Room 419 of the Howard Johnson motel on 25 May, because he was over 300 miles away, in Connecticut. It is categorically impossible for him to have been in DC at all that day.

. . . By the time Baldwin got around to sworn testimony in Congress, perhaps he’d realized just how ludicrous his claims were to the L.A. Times and to the FBI of having returned to DC on 25 May, so in his Congressional testimony he changed the date of his return to 26 May 1972.

And here I’m going to interrupt my own narrative to point out what is implied, but not spelled out specifically in the book: SOMEBODY AT THE FBI HAD TO HAVE INFORMED BALDWIN OF THE PROBLEM WITH THE 25 MAY DATE IN ORDER FOR HIM TO CHANGE IT WHEN TESTIFYING TO CONGRESS.

Why would they? Because BALDWIN BECAME A “STAR WITNESS” FOR THE U.S. ATTORNEY PROSECUTING WATERGATE, AND BALDWIN’S STORY HAD TO HOLD UP IN ORDER FOR THE HOAX THAT IS WATERGATE TO STAND AT ALL.

It’s even worse than that, though. For one thing, the CIA and FBI had a puppet in Congress named Lowell P. Weicker, Jr., who had been given a script to help Baldwin sell his fraud. The narrative from the book picks back up—and stay tuned:

He [Baldwin] laid it on thick before the Ervin Committee, and nobody does it quite like Baldwin himself—especially with his fellow citizen of Connecticut, Lowell P. Weicker, Jr., giving him script prompts:

SENATOR WEICKER: Now, Mr. Baldwin, to keep on giving the continuity here, you interrupt me or state if I am incorrect, you returned to Connecticut on May 23 and came back to Washington on May 26, is that correct?

ALFRED BALDWIN: That is correct, Friday.

SENATOR WEICKER: And you returned to room 419 of the Howard Johnsons on May 26. Now, when you entered room 419 on May 26, what did you see?

ALFRED BALDWIN: When I entered the room, there were numerous items of electronic equipment in the room. When I entered the room, it was approximately 2 in the afternoon, I believe, about that hour. Mr. McCord was in the room and operating one of the receiver units. At that time, I did not know what it was. He explained it.

SENATOR WEICKER: In other words, this was the FIrst time that you had seen electronic equipment in room 419 of the Howard Johnsons?

ALFRED BALDWIN: This particular piece of equipment that he was working on, that was the first time I had seen that. On the couch there was a piece of electronic equipment which was containing the briefcase [sic] that had been described to me— that I had previously seen at the Committee To Re-Elect the President headquarters. This was called the debugger, had a monitoring unit.

SENATOR WEICKER: In other words, you had seen a portion of the equipment?

ALFRED BALDWIN: A portion I had seen previous.

SENATOR WEICKER: At the Committee To Re-Elect the President?

ALFRED BALDWIN: That is correct. But the equipment he was working on when I entered the room, I had never seen that before.

SENATOR WEICKER: And as you entered the room, Mr. McCord was in the process of what—experimenting with this equipment? What did he indicate to you at the time you entered the room?

ALFRED BALDWIN: He was tuning this equipment. The unit was operating and he was working the tuning dials. There are several tuning dials on the piece of equipment.

SENATOR WEICKER: Did you have any questions of him as to exactly what was going on at that time?

ALFRED BALDWIN: No, I had just driven approximately six hours and he said, “As soon as you get unpacked and relaxed, I will explain this.” I said, “All right, I will take a shower and shave and join you.” . . . I was instructed to monitor all telephone conversations that were being received over these units that were in the Howard Johnson room and to make a log of all units.

Now the spy story is really on a roll, and the whole problem of 25 May has gone away by Baldwin moving his return to DC to the next day, 26 May—except now there’s something odder still, also from FBI interviews that no other coverage of Watergate ever seems to have bothered with.

To find the odd thing about all of this, it’s necessary to go back in time just a bit, to Saturday, 20 May 1972, the weekend before Baldwin left for Connecticut to get his car. Perhaps he was sitting around Room 419 of the Howard Johnson a little bored that day, and he was longing for a little companionship. On that Saturday, he placed a call to a woman named Veronica Walsh in New Jersey. The FBI found out about the call when they later traced all the calls that had been made from the room.

According to Ms. Walsh’s interview with the FBI, Al Baldwin called her that day to invite her to an event “to be held in Connecticut during the Memorial Day weekend and the wedding photos were to be presented to the Dantschers at that time.” [FBI Teletype of June 21, 1972]

Wedding photos? What wedding photos? It seems that photography was a hobby of Baldwin’s, and on 29 April 1972—just five days after James McCord had ordered walkie-talkies and had flown to New York City, and just a few days before that nighttime call from James McCord to Alfred Baldwin—Baldwin had taken photos at the wedding in New York City of John and Donna Dantscher.

Ms. Walsh told the FBI that she had declined Baldwin’s invitation. The FBI also interviewed the Dantschers. Here comes that Alfred Baldwin space and time warp again:

John S. Dantscher . . . said on the evening of May 26, 1972, he and his wife attended a social gathering at the home of Walter Walsh, 126 Bedford Avenue, Hamden, Connecticut, which was also attended by Walsh’s mother, Alfred Baldwin and John Dantscher’s mother. During this social affair Baldwin presented Dantscher and his wife with photographs taken at their wedding. Dantscher said that he had had no contact with Baldwin from the time of their wedding on April 29, 1972, until the social affair on the evening of May 26, 1972. Dantscher said he was aware that Baldwin was residing In the Washington, DC, area, however, did not know his exact address. He also recalled that during the social affair on May 26, 1972, Baldwin Indicated that he might be at the “Miami Convention.”[FBI Report of June 23, 1972 by SA Emmett J. Michaels and SA Robert C. Puckett/RCP at Hamden, Connecticut, File # NH 139-74]

To quote Art Bell: “Ohhhh, my.”

. . . The evidence from the Connecticut witnesses interviewed by the FBI was conclusive and dispositive: On Thursday, 25 May 1972, Alfred Baldwin had dropped his car off at Branhaven Chrysler-Plymouth, just outside of New Haven, Connecticut, very early in the morning. He had picked it up late in the evening of 25 May. Therefore, what he told the FBI and the L.A. Times about 25 May was patently false.

Then he showed up at a social gathering in nearby Hamden, Connecticut, the following evening, Friday, 26 May, so that would mean that what he told Congress under oath about 26 May was false, and that all the tales Baldwin told about a trip with McCord to McGovern headquarters on the night of Friday, 26 to Saturday, 27 May were false.

Do you think that Alfred Baldwin III was ever ONCE charged for lying to the FBI or to Congress? Of course he wasn’t! He couldn’t be, because he was PLANTED by the CIA and the FBI to become the “star witness” in the Watergate trial!

Oh, but it doesn’t end there. Continuing with excerpts from Watergate: The Hoax:

Wednesday, 26 July 1972

. . . Robert C. Mirto, attorney for Alfred C. Baldwin, reports falsely to the FBI and federal prosecutors that the event in Hamden, Connecticut, at which Alfred Baldwin delivered wedding photos to John Dantscher and his wife, had taken place on Wednesday night, 24 May 1972—not Friday night, 26 May 1972, as Dantscher had told the FBI right after the arrests.

This could be entered into a contest for the most infamous witness tampering of all time. As covered in chapter 2, “The Amazing Mr. Baldwin Warps Time and Space,” John Dantscher had been interviewed by the FBI in late June 1972, after the arrests, about the event at the home of Walter Walsh, in Hamden, Connecticut, at which Baldwin had delivered wedding photos. Dantscher had consulted his appointment book and told the FBI agents that he was positive that it was on Friday, 26 May 1972. But that would have utterly destroyed “The Official Story” giving Hunt, Liddy, and McCord an alibi for 26 May, in which Baldwin had to be at the Howard Johnson motel in Washington, DC, on the evening of 26 May.

Walter Walsh absolutely refused to talk to the FBI about it at all, so in an inconceivable turn of events, the Assistant US Attorney Earl Silbert issued an approval, on 26 July 1972 [careful of the “26” twosie here—26 May versus 26 July], to allow Baldwin’s own attorney, Robert Mirto, to interview Walter Walsh. [FBI Teletype of 26 July 1972, from Washington Field (139-166) (P), to Acting Director; New Haven.] It gets worse:

Mirto didn’t interview Walsh that day; he “interviewed” his own client, Baldwin. Mirto told the FBI that Baldwin had said the event had been on Wednesday, 24 May 1972. But Mirto didn’t stop there: Mirto further told the FBI on 26 July 1972 that he, Mirto, had taken it upon himself to contact John Dantscher. Mirto claimed that Dantscher had reversed his earlier FBI interview, and changed his story to the event having been on Wednesday, 24 May 1972. An FBI agent submitted a report based on this completely uncorroborated, unsupported claim by Mirto. [FBI Report of 27 July 1972, by W. C. Hendricks, Hamden, Connecticut; File No. NH139-74.] But it gets worse. Much worse:

On the very same day that Mirto “interviewed” Baldwin and told the FBI that Dantscher had changed his story—26 July 1972—FBI Special Agent Robert C. Puckett re-interviewed John Dantscher, and Dantscher, after consulting his appointment book again, reasserted directly to the FBI agent that he was “sure the social event, attended by Baldwin, was held at the Walsh home on Friday, May 26, 1972.” Not on Wednesday, 24 May, as Mirto and Baldwin claimed. [FBI Report of 27 July 1972, by W. C. Hendricks, Hamden, Connecticut; File No. NH139-74.]

And that’s not even the worst of it.

By the time this twisted carnival made it into the FBI’s official “Summary of the Reports” in the Watergate case, which summary went to Congress, it said:

On July 26, 1972, Mr. Robert C. Mirto, attorney for Alfred C. Baldwin, III, West Haven, Connecticut, advised that the social affair referred to by Mr. Dantscher was actually held on Wednesday, May 24, 1972, the date previously reported by Dantscher.

That is an absolute bald-face lie, twisting every single fact of record. Friday, 26 May 1972 was “the date previously reported by Dantscher,” and is the same date that Dantscher again told the FBI when re-interviewed on 26 July 1972. Hopefully, at this point there’s no need to point out again the CIA “twosie” involved here of use of the “26” date to sow as much confusion as possible. But there: it’s been pointed out again anyway.

The above excerpts and their cited documentation prove beyond the slightest whiff of doubt that FBI personnel, Alfred Baldwin, Baldwin’s defense lawyer, and Assistant US Attorney Silbert knowingly, willfully engaged in and condoned:

• Lying to the FBI

• Lying to Congress

• Perjury

• Obstruction of justice

• Witness tampering

• Subornation of perjury

• Criminal conspiracy to suborn perjury

• Conspiracy against rights

I daresay that unless you have read my book, you have never even heard the name “Dantscher,” or of Branhaven Chrysler Plymouth, much less the truth documented above—even if you consider yourself well informed on Watergate. You sure as HELL never heard it from those glory-boy bare-faced liars, Woodward and Bernstein, who sold you the garish, chintzy, bargain-basement spy-novel version of “The Official Story” of “Watergate”—you know, the one with the trench-coated “Deep Throat” lurking in parking garages. (Did you fall for that dime-novel garbage? Well, if so, don’t feel bad. You have plenty of company, and even the Pulitzer committee swallowed it hook, line, sinker, fishing pole, and boat.)

And you sure as HELL never heard about it from the DOJ’s senior criminal in charge of the Watergate prosecution, Earl J. “Sedition” Silbert.

Yet it is utterly impossible ever to reach any understanding of Watergate without knowing the facts about Dantscher being with Baldwin in New Haven on Friday, 26 May 1972, and about Baldwin’s car being in the Branhaven shop all day on Thursday, 25 May 1972.

This incident involving Baldwin’s pernicious perfidy and perjury is only one out of countless many such lies unearthed and exposed in Watergate: The Hoax, but the point of all of this is that the exact same kind of rotted-throughout criminality is rampant right now, today, in the FBI, the CIA, and the so-called “Intelligence Community.”

It is the largest criminal syndicate and “protection racket” in the history of the world. If you don’t believe it, ask yourself this question and answer it honestly: Are you forced to pay them—right now, today, out of every paycheck you receive—to “protect” you?

President Trump is dead-on right to call what the FBI and CIA have been doing to him “Spygate,” and to label it correctly as a hoax. Fox News legal analyst Gregg Jarrett has a new book about to be released, The Russia Hoax, and he’s exactly right to call it that, too.

But before those, there was Watergate: The Hoax—the Deep State crimes committed in the 1970s, the book exposing those crimes published in May 2016, after almost 20 years of research. It was published to be a clarion call, a raucously clanging bell, a warning (to any who would listen) that exactly what has happened this time around was going to happen.

Thank whatever gods may be that this time we have the Internet and a few stalwart sentries manning the ramparts. I am honored if I can stand in their shadows, and I only wish that I had been able to publish Watergate: The Hoax earlier. Because so much of the most crucial data remained hidden, buried, for so long, I could not possibly, though, have done it any sooner than I did.

I am hard at work on its sequel, Stargate: The Hoax, and if anything, it tells of an even more vicious and malicious criminal conspiracy by the CIA and its twisted sisters that followed in the wake of Watergate.

My deep, humble, and sincere thanks to all who stood by me through the travails and tragedies attending all the research and writing, and to all of you who have written to me with your insights, encouragement, and support.

You always can reach me through info@chaletbooks.com. Put “Attention Ashton” in the subject line or at the top of body, and it will reach me.

Stay vigilant.

Ashton Gray

FURTHER READING

There is no way to grasp the full scope of the hoax that was “Watergate” without reading the book in its entirety, but the good people at Chalet Books have graciously made large excerpts of it available for your reading pleasure and information here:

CIA Crimes of Watergate: There Was No “First Break-In” at the Watergate; There Were No “Bugs”

CIA Crimes: There Were No “Bugs” in DNC Headquarters at the Watergate

Bob Woodward and Douglas Caddy: Deep State Operatives and Mouthpieces for CIA

CIA-FBI Crimes: The Amazing Mr. Baldwin Warps Time and Space

CIA Crimes: World War III—The Battle for Men’s Minds

CIA Crimes of Watergate: The Bizarre Case of CIA Office of Technical Services Contract 8473

CIA Crimes: 1971—Daniel Ellsberg and The Fielding Farce

The CIA Psyops of Watergate and Beyond

CIA: The Largest Criminal Organization in the History of the World

P.S. I leave you with this that some wag, who I tip my hat to, posted on Reddit:

Ashton Gray’s revolutionary 600-page CIA exposé Watergate: The Hoax prophetically foretold everything that is exploding across the headlines today about “Spygate” and the Russia hoax. It contains hundreds of cited references to government and personal documents, many of which have never been published before. It finally exposes the dirty truth behind Watergate that has confounded and dumfounded every investigation, book, report, and trier of fact that has gone before—and it is even dirtier than anyone ever guessed. The exact same kinds of tactics and methods are being used by the CIA and FBI, right now, today—still using their same Operation Mockingbird mouthpieces in “mainstream media” to package and sell their lies. Buy and read Watergate: The Hoax today, and recommend it to everyone you know, love, and care about!

Watergate: The Hoax is available now

at Amazon, iBooks and Barnes & Noble.

Order it today!

Rewrite history with the truth!

And be among the first to buy and own Ashton Gray’s revolutionary work Created Equal: The Greatest Lie, a merciless assault on 300 years of fatuously false philosophy, psychology, sociology, and politics! Order now for only $4.99 at Amazon.com.

Available as Kindle and trade paperback; also available at other fine book retailers.

Join the new cultural revolution! Buy and read Created Equal: The Greatest Lie!