“How is he to know where one thing starts and another ends?” asks one of Evenson’s characters, and that, in a nutshell, is the nature of horror in his fiction: the condition of being unable to identify any boundaries. A character in the brilliant title story suffers from a sort of epistemological panic: “Not knowing is something you can only suspend yourself in for the briefest moment,” he thinks. “No, even if what you have to face is horrible, is an inexplicably dead herd of horses, even an explicably dead family, it must be faced.” He puts the people in his fiction through a lot: confinement, mutilation, cognitive blurring and quite a bit of what Daffy Duck once characterized as “pronoun trouble”: His characters can misplace their sense of themselves in midsentence. “No, I doesn’t sound right. I can’t do it: he.” They’re as mad as Poe’s narrators and as stoic as Buster Keaton. Is this horror? I think it is. Or he does.

Michelle de Kretser’s slender novella SPRINGTIME (Catapult, paper, $11.95) carries the subtitle “A Ghost Story,” but it’s the wispiest spook story imaginable: a domestic tale in which the ghost seems almost an afterthought, an apparition that frightens only mildly and that haunts only as a metaphor for other varieties of loss. De Kretser, a native of Sri Lanka who has lived in Australia for many years, specializes in a sense of displacement, a feeling of not being fully present wherever you are — even if, like her heroine in “Springtime,” you’ve only moved from Melbourne to Sydney. The story meanders, distracted and digressive, looking at everything but the ghost, taking in the chatter at dinner parties, walks with dogs, games with children, the small dissatisfactions of a partner, until you realize that all these drifting, hovering bits of everyday life are, for this sad woman, the ghost. This is a gorgeous, delicately surprising piece of writing, horror — if it is — at its most melancholy and most elusive. It’s like spirit photography, all fuzzy outlines and unaccountable light: a snapshot of something that may or may not exist.

THE LONEY (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, $25), a first novel by Andrew Michael Hurley, is considerably longer and denser than “Springtime,” and it accommodates a few real horror-story jolts, but it, too, seems more interested in creating unsettling moods than in scaring the wits out of its readers. The setting’s the dominant element in this book, a bleak, wild stretch of northwest England in which, Hurley writes, “the wind, the rain, the sea were all in their raw states, always freshly born and feral.” This forbidding landscape features, improbably, waters that are reputed to heal the sick, like the waters of Lourdes, and to the magic spring a group of Roman Catholics make a pilgrimage, driven by the determination of one devout mother to “cure” her mute, somewhat retarded son. The longtime inhabitants of the region are a weird, unwelcoming bunch who are, in the traditional manner of closemouthed rural folk in horror stories, obviously up to no good. “I often thought,” writes the narrator, looking back on his childhood experiences in this strange place, “there was too much time there. That the place was sick with it. Haunted by it. Time didn’t leak away as it should.” Another character, in a diary, puts it this way: “It was . . . a dark and watchful place that seemed to have become adept at keeping grim secrets.”

The weather of “The Loney” is English — overcast, thick with ambiguity — and when the heavens open nothing can protect you. It’s an atmosphere for ghosts, for slaughtered animals, for pagan rituals, but Hurley, unexpectedly, uses this lowering horror-movie place as the setting for a serious drama about the nature of faith. The terrors of this novel feel timeless, almost biblical: There are abominations here, and miracles.

As ambitious as “The Loney” is, though, it’s clearly horror fiction, by even the narrowest definition. And no one would be tempted to call Victor LaValle’s ingenious THE BALLAD OF BLACK TOM (Tor/Tom Doherty, paper, $12.99) anything else, either: This darkly witty tale is right in the belly of the genre beast. The dedication reads, “For H.P. Lovecraft, with all my conflicted feelings,” and LaValle’s short novel is in fact a subversive reimagining of Lovecraft’s 1927 story “The Horror at Red Hook,” in which the fearsome creatures who ruled the earth before humanity are (perhaps) preparing for a comeback in Brooklyn. Lovecraft’s mythology of the Old Ones has proved nearly as durable as the beasts themselves, with hundreds of writers feeding off it like hungry puppies; it’s a rich, though not especially healthy, diet. LaValle’s “conflicted feelings” are appropriate. Lovecraft’s powerful pulp visions are contaminated by racism, anti-­Semitismand rabid xenophobia: In “The Horror at Red Hook,” black people and immigrants appear to frighten him at least as much as the huge, unspeakable monsters slouching toward Brooklyn to be reborn. LaValle sets his story during the Harlem Renaissance and places at its center a young black con man named Tommy Tester, who gets involved in the occult shenanigans of a rich man who means to raise the “King who sleeps at the bottom of the ocean” and “the Great Old Ones.” In this version of the Red Hook story, much more is awakened than a bunch of big ugly monsters, and the emotions LaValle evokes are well beyond what Lovecraft, even at his best, was capable of. The old master could do terror. ­LaValle can do pity and terror, as some older masters could: The horror of “The Ballad of Black Tom” comes close to tragedy.