RE: your question: "why have attitudes begun to change only now?"



I just happened to review some of my comments earlier today. At that particular point in time, the comment that I am “replying to- effectively making my choice to post another comment to my self”, as the original comment was showing as CENSORED. Any response to my comment was also CENSORED. So, I am going to start with this infinitesimal current personal event.



As a seventy year-old female that can and does actually write rather well, I now get to enjoy the perverse experience as many others of being CENSORED. Talk about new experiences, this seems like a pre-WW2 non-flash-back.



One human being, (perhaps staff member, or a reviewer paid-by-whomever-wherever) posted this sentence:



“No idea what the purpose of this contribution is, if it has one at all.”



So, not only was I censored, but at least two or three other comments were also censored.



So, to: “No idea what the purpose of this contribution is, if it has one at all.”



Yes, the comment does have a purpose. It went over your head. It did not resonate

in any manner between anything between your ears. You could not interpret any of

the factual content as having any meaning or significance to you. Because you interpreted that content in that manner, VOILA, you, in your position of power and control, could eliminate the content. You could also eliminate the content from I believe it was actually 2 other people. That is an example of the level of power that some people have over other people. "Arbitrary Power". Is that power to deny another person to be heard really your right? Well, you did prove that you could do it. And you sure did. Now, at this time, since what I had posted is again accessible on the publishing platform, and admittedly it is well-within the editorial and censoring abilities of any publisher to deny access to any kind of content submitted onto the publishing platform, especially if that publishing platform does not want to encounter personal political conflicts that affects financial media flows to keep the publishing platform operating, apparently, and just as arbitrary, another censor opened the gate, at least for now. Who knows how long any of this content will be accessible even to myself, and I am paying for access. Then everybody loses, at least sort of. There are consequences all negative regardless if anyone wins or loses.



There are different effects and affects due to the interaction. I have less power, so I then have to modify my writing content and my style if I so desire to continue to

receive approval to be considered worthy to participate, be included on any level of interaction. I can have my own personal, emotional reaction, which I really don’t want

to digress into, as that content is none of your business. But, wait it probably already is, due to the advanced AI psychological interpretative skills by the latest and greatest AI generated software due to repetitive sequential adaptation skills due to programming language development. Is this, totally logical, narrowly sequential writing style easier for you to understand? Like comprehend? And maybe be able to perform a mental task still?



So, To: “No idea what the purpose of this contribution is, if it has one at all.”



Apparently, because somebody else who also possesses a similar discriminatory level of power in the decision-making by either human or nonhuman gate-keeper, did not agree with you, The CENSORED sign was changed. Voila. Again, I am permitted by a more powerful being to what? Think about what this example is really about. Reread it if you need to. You probably do need to reread it to take away any information for yourself to continue learning about your own predicament in life.



Here’s my take-away: You are extremely narrow thinkers. You can only make very limited decisions. If you can make effective and affective decisions of real consequence at all. Do you really have any power over anything? I really suggest that you re-read Schwab’s title question again. You don’t have a clue about anything that is significant in this day and age. I don’t know how old you are, or if you are even human. However, I do wish you well, and good luck. Thank you for permitting me to continue to write on your website.



I am also going to answer, again, the original second level question that Kraus asked:

"WHY have attitudes begun to change only now? "



Actually, attitudes have not begun to change only now. Attitudes have been changing for quite a while. However, it has taken a while for any detrimental effects to be perceived by certain people that are in positions of power to be personally affected by any attitudinal changes by other people,( that are not of any consequence in the greater scheme of things or count for a bit) that have NOT personally affected them over some of the past 50 years.



You didn’t notice. You didn’t have to.



Any of the answers that I have written at this time are and are not correct. There are

also other answers that are also more and less correct than these answers as I have just written. It doesn't mean that they are any better or any worse. That's a real basic problem.