James Brodeur "Good afternoon. As of today, I am officially a former "digital media specialist" (a nice way to say "paid Internet troll") previously employed by Hillary Clinton's campaign (through a PR firm). I'm posting here today as a confession of sorts because I can no longer continue to participate in something that has become morally-indigestible for me. (This is a one-time throwaway account, but I'll stick around for this thread.) First, my background. I am [redacted] ... and first became involved in politics during the 2008 presidential race. I worked as a volunteer for Hillary during the Democratic primary and then for the Democratic Party in the general election. I was not heavily involved in the 2012 election cycle (employment issues - volunteering doesn't pay the rent), and I wasn't really planning on getting involved in this cycle until I was contacted by a friend from college around six months ago about working on Hillary's campaign. I was skeptical at first (especially after my experience as an unpaid volunteer in 2008), but I eventually came around. The work time and payment was flexible, and I figured that I could bring in a little extra money writing about things I supported anyways. After some consideration, I emailed my resume to the campaign manager he had named, and within a week, I was in play. I don't want to get bogged down on this subject, but I was involved with PPP (pay per post) on forums and in the comments section of (mostly-liberal) news and blog sites. Spending my time on weekends and evenings, I brought in roughly an extra $100 or so a week, which was a nice cushion for me. At first, the work was fun and mostly unsupervised. I posted mostly positive things about Hillary and didn't engage in much negativity. Around the middle of July, however, I received notification that the team would be focusing not on pro-Hillary forum management, but on "mitigation" (the term our team leader used) for a Vermont senator named Bernie Sanders. I'd been out of college for several years and hadn't heard much about Sanders, and so I decided to do some research to get a feel for him. To be honest, I was skeptical of what Sanders was saying at the beginning, and didn't have much of a problem pointing out the reasons why I believed that Hillary was the better candidate. Over a period of two months, I gradually started to find Bernie appealing, even if I still disagreed with him on some issues. By September, I found myself as a closet Bernie supporter, though I still believed that Hillary was the only electable Democratic candidate. The real problem for me started around the end of September and the beginning of October, when there was a change of direction from the team leader again. Apparently, the higher-ups in the firm caught wind of an impending spending splurge by the Clinton campaign that month and wanted to put up an impressive display. We received very specific instructions about how and what to post, and I was aghast at what I saw. It was a complete change in tone and approach, and it was extremely nasty in character. We changed from advocates to hatchet men, and it left a very bad taste in my mouth. Just to give you an idea, here are some of the guidelines for our posting in October: 1) Sexism. This was the biggest one we were supposed to push. We had to smear Bernie as misogynistic and out-of-touch with modern sensibilities. He was to be characterized as "an old white male relic that believed women enjoyed being gang raped". Anyone who tried to object to this characterization would be repeatedly slammed as sexist until they went away or people lost interest. 2) Racism. We were instructed to hammer home how Bernie supporters were all privileged white students that had no idea how the world worked. We had to tout Hillary's great record with "the blacks" (yes, that's the actual way it was phrased), and generally use racial identity politics to attack Sanders and bolster Hillary as the only unifying figure. 3) Electability. All of those posts about how Sanders can never win and Hillary is inevitable? Some of those were us, done deliberately in an attempt to demoralize Bernie supporters and convince them to stop campaigning for him. The problem is that this was an outright fabrication and not an accurate assessment of the current political situation. But the truth didn't matter - we were trying to create a new truth, not to spread the existing truth. 4) Dirty tactics. This is where things got really bad. We were instructed to create narratives of Clinton supporters as being victimized by Sanders supporters, even if they were entirely fabricated. There were different instructions about how to do it, but something like this ( http://www.dailykos.com/.../-Dis-heartened-Hillary-Supporter ) is a perfect example. These kind of posts are manufactured to divide and demoralize Sanders supporters, and are entirely artificial in nature. (The same thing happened in 2008, but it wasn't as noticeable before social media and public attention focused on popular forums like Reddit). 5) Opponent outreach. There are several forums and imageboards where Sanders is not very popular (I think you can imagine which ones those are.) We were instructed to make pro-Sanders troll posts to rile up the user base and then try to goad them into raiding or attacking places like this subreddit. This was probably the only area where we only had mixed success, since that particular subset of the population were more difficult to manipulate than we originally thought. In any case, the final nail in the coffin for me happened last night. I was on an imageboard trying to rile up the Trump-supporting natives with inflammatory Bernie posting, and the sum of responses I received basically argued that at least Bernie was genuine in his belief, even if they disagreed with his positions, which made him infinitely better than the 100% amoral and power-hungry Hillary. I had one of those "what are you doing with your life" moments. When even the scum of 4chan think that your candidate is too scummy for their tastes, you need to take a good hard look at your life. Then this morning I read that the National Association of Broadcasters were bankrolling both Clinton and Rubio, and that broke the camel's back. I emailed my resignation this morning. I'm going to go all in for Bernie now, because I truly believe that the Democratic Party has lost its way, and that redemption can only come by standing for something right and not by compromising for false promises and fake ideals. I want to apologize to everyone here for my part in this nasty affair, and I hope you will be more aware of attempts to sway you away from supporting the only candidate that can bring us what we need."

Similar Messages:

https://stream.org/astroturf-outrage-machine-of-paid-trolls-floods-social-media-to-counteract-negative-news-about-hillary-clinton/ A significant portion of online support for Hillary Clinton is manufactured by paid “astroturf” trolls: a large team of supporters who spend long hours responding to negative news on the internet about her. See link for full story. ...

Sudden uptick in ridiculous attacks on Trump, denials and crappy excuses for Hillary, a noticeable trend in post like/dislikes, etc. All in about the last 10 days, I'd say. Well, that's how Hillary rolls. ...

http://redstatewatcher.com/article.asp?id=46969 Summer Zervos the Ex-Apprentice loser who claimed Donald Trump sexually assaulted her was bribed with $500,000 by lawyer Gloria Allred to fabricate the story. Allred is a Hillary Clinton collaborator and DNC Associate. According to an anonymous source this deal was reportedly shopped around to other ex-Apprentice contestants. Truthfeed.com reported: GotNews’ source tells us that Zervos’ sexual harassment accusation against Trump is a ...

This past month, there was much outrage over the fact that General Electric, despite making $14.2 billion in profits, paid zero U.S. taxes in 2010. General Electric actually received tax credits of $3.2 billion from American taxpayers. At the same time that General Electric was not paying taxes, many undocumented immigrants, who are typically accused of taking advantage of the system while not contributing to it by many on the right, paid $11.2 billion in taxes. A new study by the I ...

Hmmm.....I'm wondering if this can explain some of the liberal extremist posts on this board. It just may be that they work for BO. ...

Rise of the Teabaggers Parts 1 and 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ntrrUzNiggQ&feature=player_embedded http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zFtvw4pFsTM&feature=player_embedded ...

Obama or the democratic party. This is for those who don't wish to go down to my first posting or wish to ignore it. I just want to make sure everyone is straight on this. OBAMA OR THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE STOCK MARKET RALLY TODAY. There. Is that clear enough? The stock market closed at 13,292 because the ECG (European Central Bank) is buying up bonds. It has nothing to do with Obama. I can't believe you're trying to give credit to him or the part ...

So, if Social Security is not the issue, why are they talking about cutting it? The C-Span video is at about the 28 minute mark (about 1/4 of the way) http://www.c-span.org/Events/Washington-Journal-for-Friday-July-29/10737423162-1/ When Peter Coy, the Bloomberg Businessweek Economics Editor, appeared this morning on "Washington Journal," he brought along a chart for his discussion of the magazine's cover article, "Why the Debt Crisis is Even Worse Than You Think." But, the chart, ...

But they are. Let's stop that. See petition below. ...

Setting up a camp next to the river they were supposedly there to protect - when the weather turned cold (which they blamed on North Dakota controlling the weather just to get them to leave) they moved to the local casino and into Mandan to take up residence, all the while being supported by who???? A propane truck delivered propane to the site south of Manday, ND and when asked who was paying for it, he said they didn't know - but the bill was being paid. Supplies came to the c ...

He remarks on his time at the debate "I'm not getting paid for this." I wonder if he were to be awarded the PRIVILEGE of the presidency that he would consider the duties important enough to warrant his time and attention, due diligence and civility? Does the job PAY enough to warrant that for him? I mean he's "RICH" and all. His comments on Megyn Kelly's efforts are disgusting. http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/08/politics/donald-trump-cnn-megyn-kelly-comment/ ...

He always told you how rich he was and implied that he could afford anything he wanted. Let him pay the SS ...

transplant. He did not even use his OWN MONEY. It just gets worst and worst. Bioethistist stated people of that age are NORMALLY not included on transplant lists. ...

"Illegal immigrants and prison inmates received more than $120 million in Medicare services from 2009-2011 despite federal law that makes them ineligible for the program, according to two new reports from the HHS inspector general. "The issue, according to the reports, is timing. When Medicare is alerted that someone is incarcerated or undocumented, its contractors help prevent payments from going out the door. But often, Medicare’s databases aren’t up to date, and improper payments go o ...

Two of the women received $425 each and the other $300. ...

Link: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/report-obamacare-contractors-paid-to-do-nothing/ ...

Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist David Cay Johnston, who has covered Trump off and on for 27 years, reports that he has three of Trumps tax returns from the late 70s - early 80s show Trump paid NO income tax, despite bragging about a 400 million annual income! Ralph Nader also reported there were years when Trump paid zero taxes, but he did not specify which years.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Stie3b7fWHcI found it interesting that when Donald Trump refers to IRS audits, he says t ...

for waiting in line. "Amazon warehouses are full of stuff people like. To cut down on theft, workers who box and ship it are required to pass through security checkpoints after their shifts, waiting in lines that can take almost 30 minutes to get through. On Oct. 8 the Supreme Court will hear arguments about whether that time counts as work." Gee, aren't these Amazon workers lucky that they do not work for MTSOs who constantly run out of work and leave thei ...

In this case, this man left his job to pursue political organization. If he receives money to help with his expenses, I suppose you would say he is paid. (He has used a good part of his own money, but I am certain that is running thin.) He is doing the work of many who are unable to participate due to their own obligations to family and some who simply could not live this way. I, for one, appreciate the work he does, am happy to contribute and do not deny anyone o ...

http://www.alternet.org/right-wing/there-are-real-paid-protesters-theyre-all-right-wingers ...

We are stupid. Maybe Republicans are. But, there is no difference between paying govmt penalty from paying insurance company penalty, except....oh, yeah...the premiums are going to be higher for people that need insurance too...no subsidies based on income. We are totally screwed. http://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/339488-senate-adds-penalty-for-going-uninsured-to-healthcare-bill ...

They're both moochers, not just Michelle and mom. link ...

xx ...

At least some of the protesters who looted, rioted, burned buildings and overturned police cars in Ferguson, Missouri, last year were promised payment of up to $5,000 per month to join the protests. However, when the Missourians Organizing for Reform and Empowerment (MORE), the successor group to the now-bankrupt St. Louis branch of ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now), stiffed the protesters, they launched a sit-in protest at the headquarters of MORE and created a Tw ...

I think the Clintons believe in the old adage “Charity begins at home”. ...

Chinese netizens welcome Obama's visit with thousands of questions www.chinaview.cn 2009-11-13 23:04:27 BEIJING, Nov.13 (Xinhua) -- Chinese netizens have prepared thousands of questions for US President Barack Obama during his Nov. 15-18 visit to China, covering a wide range of topics from Sino-U.S. relations to U.S. first lady Michelle Obama. &n ...

The Obama administration is withholding from Congress details about how $1.3 billion in U.S. taxpayer funds was delivered to Iran, according to conversations with lawmakers, who told the Washington Free Beacon that the administration is now stonewalling an official inquiry into the matter. The Departments of State, Treasury, and Justice have all rebuffed a congressional probe into the circumstances surrounding the $1.3 billion payment to Iran, which is part of an additional $400 million cash ...

I'll give ya 3 guesses and the first 2 don't count. http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2010/06/rahm-emanuels-.html ...

but it wasn't president Obama. A little history in review, some of it in his own words. ...

Every senator who accepted money from the Iranian American Political Action Committee (IPAC) should be impeached and removed from office — or at very least, soundly defeated the next time he or she comes up for reelection. But the Enemedia, true to form, will cover for them and do everything it can to keep them on the government payroll. One of the many unanswered questions about P5+1 agreement with Iran is why so many Congressional Democrats are rallying behind the President on this issue ...