Download raw source

Delivered-To: john.podesta@gmail.com Received: by 10.25.24.31 with SMTP id o31csp2290161lfi; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 18:22:07 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.50.148.101 with SMTP id tr5mr1799741igb.12.1424830925690; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 18:22:05 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: <robbymook2015@gmail.com> Received: from mail-ig0-x236.google.com (mail-ig0-x236.google.com. [2607:f8b0:4001:c05::236]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id uu10si10879840igb.17.2015.02.24.18.22.05 for <john.podesta@gmail.com> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 24 Feb 2015 18:22:05 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of robbymook2015@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c05::236 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4001:c05::236; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of robbymook2015@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c05::236 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=robbymook2015@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: by mail-ig0-x236.google.com with SMTP id h15so534017igd.3 for <john.podesta@gmail.com>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 18:22:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=efau5L/vVPDr0AkyGJ/we3GhnsR8qcGfA74vT409CII=; b=hlsoc6+vzBH+iIiXXDIUtyT3IglfiBU0HNbKskhC0sFasx1dev61BdcEc8oKDbl+Fr EM2SJT6b2vGXXrKrgclZ/hUZ+/XkYKPCNQW+/JUXWZaMW9x2rD0pdn0RC1udtapYevlO AZCTs5vC6dbBpQZSc4h6ZTI+vyW+gf1RWoaCmjbQ1N2Eip4BNlPyHYkGyHAZJVud330a M8Mpt/lauQ0yYegr6L6KMs+NIFQmqW9HCKwAPjj3tqfKoQsV/lIXY7e3HziVN2jv0fLQ w0izyeFXOZVrVmaEpCNghn/kQTi3lSp6cdaucq1Jxu2DHSIJ4spyaL/XHVuDqDz383hs QGiw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.134.160 with SMTP id q32mr1748314ioi.70.1424830924884; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 18:22:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.148.5 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 18:22:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 21:22:04 -0500 Message-ID: <CAB5o6bY29TaX06JGScXEgWEpW_fzWOOcc=J4+u9V-HBDBef6vg@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Foundation vulnerability points From: Robby Mook <robbymook2015@gmail.com> To: Cheryl Mills <cmills@cdmillsgroup.com>, John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com>, "huma@hrcoffice.com" <huma@hrcoffice.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113f92a62490e7050fe04d50 --001a113f92a62490e7050fe04d50 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Below is a list of key vulberability points for consideration. John, I added some important process questions at the end per our discussion this morning. *Donations and candidate participation* - Money from foreign governments - Domestic or foreign individual donors with vetting issues (i.e. the campaign and foundation should agree on vetting criteria and jointly discuss any donors who fall outside the criteria) - HRC attending Foundation events - HRC's name remaining in the Foundation name *Operational issues* - Travel on corporate or donated planes (these should be vetted against SD and Senate work) - Especially lavish/high-end hotels for events - Overseas events with foreign leaders or government officials - If the Foundations issue reports that are critical of its own progress or indicate that there may not have been progress on projects - Potential conflicts from overseas-owned organizations (UK and Sweeden) *Process questions * - Who presents information to HRC and the family on vulnerabilities and press issues? - Who needs to be engaged in discussing press matters regarding the foundation? - Who has the ultimate say on press language? Who is engaged in the sign off process? (note: the Foundation will be the on the record voice on Foundation issues) - Is the campaign engaged in discussing Foundation donor vetting? - Is the campaign engaged in discussing Foundation operations like foreign events, domestic events to avoid vulnerabilities? --001a113f92a62490e7050fe04d50 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><div><span style=3D"font-size:13.3333339691162px">Below is= a list of key vulberability points for consideration.=C2=A0 John, I added = some important process questions at the end per our discussion this morning= . =C2=A0</span></div><div><br></div><div><span style=3D"font-size:13.333333= 9691162px"><b>Donations and candidate participation</b></span></div><span s= tyle=3D"font-size:13.3333339691162px"><ul><li><span style=3D"font-size:13.3= 333339691162px">Money from foreign governments=C2=A0</span><br></li><li><sp= an style=3D"font-size:small">Domestic or foreign individual donors with vet= ting issues (i.e. the campaign and foundation should agree on vetting crite= ria and jointly discuss any donors who fall outside the criteria)</span><br= ></li><li><span style=3D"font-size:13.3333339691162px">HRC attending Founda= tion events</span><br></li><li><span style=3D"font-size:13.3333339691162px"= >HRC's name remaining in the Foundation name</span><br></li></ul></span= ><div><div style=3D"font-size:13.3333339691162px"><br></div><div style=3D"f= ont-size:13.3333339691162px"><b>Operational issues</b></div><div style=3D"f= ont-size:13.3333339691162px"><ul><li><span style=3D"font-size:13.3333339691= 162px">Travel on corporate or donated planes (these should be vetted agains= t SD and Senate work)</span><br></li><li><span style=3D"font-size:13.333333= 9691162px">Especially lavish/high-end hotels for events</span><br></li><li>= <span style=3D"font-size:13.3333339691162px">Overseas events with foreign l= eaders or government officials</span></li><li><span style=3D"font-size:13.3= 333339691162px">If the Foundations issue reports that are critical of its o= wn progress or indicate that there may not have been progress on projects</= span><br></li><li><span style=3D"font-size:13.3333339691162px">Potential co= nflicts from overseas-owned organizations (UK and Sweeden)</span></li></ul>= </div></div><div style=3D"font-size:13.3333339691162px"><br></div><div styl= e=3D"font-size:13.3333339691162px"><b>Process questions=C2=A0</b></div><div= style=3D"font-size:13.3333339691162px"><ul><li><span style=3D"font-size:13= .3333339691162px">Who presents information to HRC and the family on vulnera= bilities and press issues?</span></li><li><span style=3D"font-size:13.33333= 39691162px">Who needs to be engaged in discussing press matters regarding t= he foundation?</span></li><li><span style=3D"font-size:13.3333339691162px">= Who has the ultimate say on press language?=C2=A0 Who is engaged in the sig= n off process? (note: the Foundation will be the on the record voice on Fou= ndation issues)</span><br></li><li>Is the campaign engaged in discussing Fo= undation donor vetting? =C2=A0</li><li>Is the campaign engaged in discussin= g Foundation operations like foreign events, domestic events to avoid vulne= rabilities?</li></ul></div><div style=3D"font-size:13.3333339691162px"><br>= </div><div style=3D"font-size:13.3333339691162px"><br></div></div> --001a113f92a62490e7050fe04d50--