The Viability Of Maintaining Female Life Past Breeding Age In Space. Is There Really Life After 30?

http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/feminist-violence/alexacaliente-alyssapry-anitasarkeesian-jaclynf-abc-radfem-hub-the-underbelly-of-a-hate-movement/

A response scenario to the proposal of Radfem Hub (Radfem is short for Radical Feminist, is a website featuring articles from well-known activists, many of whom are in significant real-world positions of political and social influence.). The site has been the focus of some attention since Simon and Schuster novelist Pamela O’Shaughnessy, posting under the name Vliet Tiptree, penned an article there advocating human scientific experimentation and forced eugenics, in order to “extirpate” certain aspects of masculinity.

Personally, I fully agree with Radfem for the removal of certain traits from portions of society. But why in the world would humanity want to eradicate the most successful of the species, when for the furtherment of our species in space, we will we quire the physical strength of males to produce power and actually do physical work.

I instead propose another side to the coin. Forced termination of female life post 30 for space exploration.

Firstly, what use for procreation is a woman past the age of 30 in space? Its not a misogynist question, it’s simply a biological fact. In space, will there be viability for women over the age of 30?

For the continuation of our species in space, only perfect and efficient specimens will be required. Nothing can be a drain on resources that could possibly harm the species as a whole.

In space, we will all be responsible for our entire lives to produce the energy we need to live and to procreate. It won’t be about careers in fashion and beauty, retail or care. It will solely be about producing the energy to keep everybody alive.

Post 30, females begin to have issues with fertility. Enough said. Humanity can not risk unnecessary risks for birth defects that come with aging. No females could be allowed to procreate past that age.

The female/male anatomy is another factor when considering a recommended life expectancy for humans in space. Males on average tend to be 20% larger than females.

CrossFit recommends that the weights be scaled down 65-70% for females when compared to the prescribed weight for males. Of course, this is the prescribed weight, and women adjust according to their ability. (https://www.quora.com/How-much-stronger-is-an-average-man-than-an-average-woman)

They have found that 65-70% is a good starting point to adjust from for most females. A male in space will be required to produce 100% of the energy he needs to keep himself alive and another 100% to contribute to the hive. It will take him a full working day to accomplish this manually in times of crisis (ie: power crisis where dynamo is required).

I’m going to put myself into a future human males shoes trying desperately to survive in space. I don’t think that I would be very happy producing enough energy to keep both myself alive and female who can only produce 30% of the energy I can. That would mean that I would be responsible for producing 70% of a woman’s energy needs (not to mention the food that would be required for those that chose to be curvalisious and ‘fit at any size’) for 70 years, if the average lifespan by that point is 90. I do not think that such an effort would be feasible. I would have no qualms doing all that in return for procreation, but only while a females ability to procreate is viable.

I anticipate the argument that there could be a return to traditional roles for females:

Mothers will always be needed to bring up well balanced children.

Study shows most offenders in prison come from single mother families, but we see stable families being brought up in single father households. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3668890/When-Ian-Britain-s-surrogate-father-no-wife-help-branded-selfish-deluded-Fifteen-years-good-dad-s-been.html

Women will always play an important role in food production.

In space, everything will be replicated and any food that will need to be grown will always be done by the male as the work is laborious.

Women have always excelled at household management.

Our future in space will see self cleaning surfaces and service robots.

Relationships will always be a mainstay for humans.

Sadly for women, robots will take their place in mens lives with regards to relationships. We already see the worry in the women’s movement that shows how frightened they are of the possibility of being replaced. I mean, really? Actual women… balanced against …super hot, programmable, self slopping robot? I don’t think there is much competition.

Feminists want to ban sex robots ‘because they’re like prostitutes’

In a space utopia where everything is provided for you so long as you are either fertile or can manually produce all of the energy required from each person, the injured, weak, or non fertile will very sadly always be a liability to the survival of the whole.

So, I envision a kind of Logan’s Run/Soylent Green. No dots on their palms tho. Right in the middle of the forehead so they can’t hide. But instead of green wafers coming out of the machine, fish cakes come out instead.

Our morality is based on a plentiful planet with enough for everybody. On a space ship with limited resources, it becomes everyman for themselves and adopting a new morality that may not favour females at all.