Text Size: A- A+

Our cities suck. Latest data from global agencies reminds us that 15 of the 20 most polluted cities are in India. Given how rapidly we are worsening, and urbanising, it is a matter of time when we count, maybe, 25 of the dirtiest 30, and so on.

Traffic in our cities crawls. In Mumbai, it is now at 8 kmph. Bengaluru is worse. My suggestion to Google Maps: Rename it as ‘Waterloo’ — its own, of course.

Hyderabad may be a bit better, Kolkata even improving, which is a gift of its economic decline. And Delhi may not catch up with Mumbai or Bengaluru just yet. But work in progress. Particularly if you are commuting to its twin ‘downtown’ of Gurugram and Noida.

Between these biggest metros, Delhi-Mumbai-Kolkata-Bengaluru-Hyderabad, more than 9 crore people live. For ease of understanding, since New Zealand is the new liberal El Dorado right now, the population of these metros is about 20 times the wonderful nation that gave us icons like Jacinda Ardern and Kane Williamson. And 150 times that of Luxembourg.

Why I bring in that tiny jewel of Europe, I shall let you know soon. Suffice it to say, a mass of humanity lives in fast urbanising India’s cities. I can quote McKinsey Institute and many other studies, but nobody now disputes that in another five years—just another five years—more people will be living in India’s cities than the entire population of the United States of America.

Nearly 50 per cent of Mumbai’s population lives in slums or semi-slums. They make great movie sets and plots for ‘feel-sorry-for-these-poor-and-lovely-wretches’ liberal writing. But think New Zealand again. Our commercial capital keeps a population two times that country in subhuman living conditions. Kolkata is no better and Bengaluru is making rapid progress. No other city in India, even that planned sarkari utopia Chandigarh, is without slums.

What is a slum in Mumbai is usually an unauthorised or illegal colony in Delhi. The quality of life may not be as abysmal as in Mumbai, but isn’t much better either. In any case, about the same population as Kane Williamson’s country lives as ‘illegals’ in our national capital. Our public hospitals, medical care, education and colleges are all rotting, overcrowded and either of sub-Saharan quality, or demand Harvard-level scores—check out cut-offs in top ‘public’ colleges in Delhi.

Also read: Power to water: If India wants to fulfil economic goals, it needs better infrastructure

If our cities are so bad, why do millions still keep leaving their supposedly more virtuous villages and moving to the cities? Because our villages suck too. On practically every parameter except air quality, they would be worse than the cities.

India may have become the fifth or even third-largest economy in the world, but our mindset towards our cities is still conditioned by one of the great Gandhian hypocrisies we have perpetuated. That the cities are evil, villages virtuous. We’ve all heard in some context that famous old exchange where Ambedkar apparently responded to Gandhi saying India lives in its villages by asking: But must it continue to do so for ever?

The union cabinet has always had a rural development ministry. But, for nearly five decades after independence, we didn’t quite have a full ministry of urban development. It was more like, ‘Works and Housing’. The ‘India lives in its villages’ romanticism endures, to the great detriment of India’s cities, their poor, and at zero benefit to the villages. Or crores wouldn’t be fleeing them.

Even during the tenure of Dr A.P.J. Abdul Kalam in Rashtrapati Bhavan, the mythology was furthered by an idea called PURA, or Providing Urban Amenities in Rural Areas. Everyone applauded his PowerPoint presentations on this, and sniggered on the side.

First of all, an Indian village simply did not have the scale or economics to build urban-level infrastructure. Especially as the political class is unwilling to charge the village Indian for water, power or any other utilities. And then, what urban facilities was he talking about when our cities are such a disaster?

This mindset has had deeply damaging and far-reaching consequences. Because we think cities are evil, villages are virtuous, Indian cities are never planned. They grow by themselves into massive, self-governing slums, punctuated by islands created by individual builders, ‘audacious’ real estate entrepreneurs and mafias who can work the system.

Our cities therefore grow without infrastructure. It comes later, usually over three generations. Then the millions living there need water, power, roads, rail, metros and you have to dig underneath them, build above, go over the seas.

Yet, millions of cars and two-wheelers have no place to park except sidewalks (where they exist) and public spaces, usually blocking entire roads. It isn’t just the poor that are victims of this. Check out the fancy Worli-Parel development in Mumbai.

Scores of fancy apartment and business towers have come up in the past two decades, mostly on old textile mill lands. But most have built their own infrastructure, from water to parking to security. They nestle in the middle of old, much poorer populations native to the area, deprived of such comforts. This makes for a very unequal neighbourhood, not just in terms of economic status, but also what the state, or a city should give equally to all its residents.

Or you can go to the fanciest buildings in Gurugram. They all float on their individual, giant septic tanks and diesel reservoirs. The first, because nobody ever bothered laying down a sewer system for India’s fanciest new post-reform development, and second, because nobody trusts state power utility. You want to know how ridiculous this is?

You’d remember a phase of labour unrest in the Maruti factory a few years ago when unions and activists alleged that a large number of workers had been killed by the police, their bodies thrown in the gutter and sewer. The chief minister asserted, in confident, self-righteous defence, that it had to be a lie because no sewer has ever been built in this Gurgaon.

This week’s National Interest is provoked (or triggered, which millennials prefer) by the Bombay High Court order stopping work on Mumbai’s long-delayed coastal road project. The 219-page order written by Chief Justice Pradeep Nandrajog and Justice N.M. Jamdar is among the best-crafted and comprehensible judgments I have read in sometime. The judges have spoken sense on there being no conflict between environment and development, need for balance and adherence to laws.

They haven’t struck down the project on merits of feasibility or environmental damage, but on a technicality. The project, they say, got its clearance as a road. But it also involves reclamation of 90 hectares (about 230 acres, or 40 football fields) from the sea. It is, therefore, a building project, never mind that the reclaimed land is only to be used for public spaces like parks, cycle and jogging tracks, and bus parking. So, the government can come back for clearances again, but as a city development project. You can’t grudge the activists their celebrations. They’ve won.

Read the judgment carefully, however, and you may cry. I cannot fault it on law. I only highlight a point where the judges say, the project also needs wildlife clearance.

Because the petitioners said corals along the coastline will be destroyed. Studies—presented in the court—have indeed shown coral near Haji Ali and Worli: All of two patches of 0.251 and 0.11 sq metres respectively, or about four sq feet in all. I know the perils of walking into a ‘lovely coral’ versus ‘ugly human’ debate, but what the hell.

The fact is, the project will ultimately get built. A year later and a thousand crore costlier. I am not sure the coral would survive, though I’d hope it does. Because people in the condominiums and slums can wait. Activists can savour victory until then.

This is like living on Cloud ‘Coral’ Cuckooland. Or, remember one of the arguments advanced in favour of free rides for women in Delhi Metro and buses: Luxembourg has done it. It has 6 lakh people, or about 3 per cent of Delhi, and a per capita income of $1.1 lakh, that is nearly 55 times India’s. As long as we have our Luxembourg and “four square feet of corals are better than 20 million humans” fantasies, our cities will rot. And millions will still keep flocking to them from even more rotten villages.

Also read: Household savings hold the key to funding Modi govt’s mega infrastructure plans

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Why news media is in crisis & How you can fix it You are reading this because you value good, intelligent and objective journalism. We thank you for your time and your trust. You also know that the news media is facing an unprecedented crisis. It is likely that you are also hearing of the brutal layoffs and pay-cuts hitting the industry. There are many reasons why the media’s economics is broken. But a big one is that good people are not yet paying enough for good journalism. We have a newsroom filled with talented young reporters. We also have the country’s most robust editing and fact-checking team, finest news photographers and video professionals. We are building India’s most ambitious and energetic news platform. And have just turned three. At ThePrint, we invest in quality journalists. We pay them fairly. As you may have noticed, we do not flinch from spending whatever it takes to make sure our reporters reach where the story is. This comes with a sizable cost. For us to continue bringing quality journalism, we need readers like you to pay for it. If you think we deserve your support, do join us in this endeavour to strengthen fair, free, courageous and questioning journalism. Please click on the link below. Your support will define ThePrint’s future. Support Our Journalism

Show Full Article