only if there has been full disclosure by both parties of everything each party knows which is significant to the agreement

who does not tell all the possible bad news as well as the good

a "contract" based on the fact that one person has been doing a particular thing and the other person expects him/her to continue

Mark:You said "And, we wouldn't need Billy's consent, as it only says Mitchell."Guess again....check appropriate consent laws as applicable in Florida let alone any state within which this is sold, but start with Florida.While the last name alone is used, it is in conjunction with an established brand and/or product which promotes and features the individual bearing that name, and when used in conjunction with both that brand/product AND the name "Wiebe" there is no court of law that will deny the association has to do specifically with Bill Mitchell and with the intent to represent Bill Mitchell, and for that you will normally need consent...UNLESS he signed away consent as part of any agreement already signed with Launchpad.But unless any purported and signed agreement covered merchandising using his name in association with the film/brand/product and waived his consent, that's a problem.Here is a start... http://dictionary.law.com/default2.asp?selected=955&bold= ||||informed consentn. agreement to do something or to allow something to happen only after all the relevant facts are known. In contracts, an agreement may be reached. A patient's consent to a medical procedure must be based on his/her having been told all the possible consequences, except in emergency cases when such consent cannot be obtained. A physician or dentist, operates at his/her peril of a lawsuit if anything goes wrong. In criminal law, a person accused or even suspected of a crime cannot give up his/her legal rights such as remaining silent or having an attorney, unless he/she has been fully informed of his/her rights. http://dictionary.law.com/default2.asp?selected=904&bold= ||||implied consentn. consent when surrounding circumstances exist which would lead a reasonable person to believe that this consent had been given, although no direct, express or explicit words of agreement had been uttered. Examples: a); b) the defense in a "date rape" case in which there is a claim of assumed consent due to absence of protest or a belief that "no" really meant "yes," "maybe" or "later."So, if Bill objects at this point or at some reasonable point thereafter, a reasonable judge can determine that consent was NOT given or implied...unless Bill waived this in signing something.I'll let you delve into Florida law here...Welcome to the source for Florida law on the Web.One source to read..."In administering Florida's implied consent law..."Gets better from there. Geez, I thought someone would have done this by now.Robert