Most of the funding for 'No on 37' is coming from GMO companies not even located in California

(NaturalNews) The latest campaign finance disclosure records released by California's Secretary of State reveal that the most evil corporation in the world, Monsanto, has forked over, the historic bill that, if passed, will require genetically-modified (GM) foods and food ingredients to be labeled at the retail level in California.Combined with its other recent contributions of more than $4.2 million ( http://www.naturalnews.com ), Monsanto has now officially shelled out a total ofto prevent consumers from knowing the truth about what is really contained in the foods they buy.Along with Monsanto's latest contributions were similar contributions by the other five of the "Big Six" pesticide firms -- DuPont, Bayer, Dow, BASF, and Syngenta -- which together gaveto thecampaign as part of their most recent contributions. To date, the "Big Six" have collectively contributedto keep Californians in the dark about GMOs."Monsanto wants to buy this election so they can keep hiding what's really in our food," said Gary Ruskin, campaign manager for, about Monsanto's efforts to stamp out the potential for mandating food transparency. "(But) they are on the losing side of history. Californians want the right to know what's in our food, and we will win it."Interestingly,, which just goes to show how far-reaching the scope of Prop. 37 will be once it is passed. Only one of the top ten antagonists in the fight for honesty in food labeling, Nestle USA, is based out of California , and even this company has its roots overseas in Switzerland.Below is a list of the top ten contributors to thecampaign, which is trying to stop GMO labeling in California:As you will notice, every single one of these companies has a critical stake in making sure that, because every single one of these companies eitherIf GMO labeling is mandated in California, the "Big Six" will lose significant market share as many large food companies like Coca-Cola and Pepsi will have to either reformulate their products to exclude GMOs, or risk losing much of their customer base by labeling GMOs, which Monsanto admitted many years ago is akin to putting "a skull and crossbones" on the food label. ( https://www.naturalnews.com/035578_Monsanto_petition_biotechnology.html And since large food conglomerates distribute their offerings nationwide, mandatory labeling in California, the world's eighth largest economy,. This is why it isYou can learn more about thecampaign by visiting: