Here are some province conversion errors/improvements I found from converting the William start date, aside from ones I noted above. I don't know how the converter actually works aside from what I've gleaned from reading the province_table so I'm sorry if I'm just pointing out what should go where with no real explanation.- c_vodi should probably convert to Neva (33) in EUIV, while c_koporje converts as Ingermanland (34). Currently c_vodi converts as both provinces.- c_beloozero isn't actually linked to the EUIV Beloozero (312), instead it's linked with Tikhvin (2749), which means that Rostov (and anyone else owning Beloozero) gets a random province in the middle of Novgorod when converted. In SWMH, Tikhvin seems to be in c_bezhetsky_verh, so it might be better to link EUIV Tikhvin with that province.- Alencon (1879) in EUIV is connected to c_chartres for some reason even though they're not really in the same area; it would probably be better to link it with c_maine as they both share a similar amount of territory.- c_kola should be linked to Olonets (309) ; right now Olonets links to a province in Bjarmia (I assume because the SWMH team repurposed provinces in the area)- Related to the above, the EUIV province of Kola (1777) should link to c_kandalax; right now it links to c_kola (actually Olonets) as well- For some reason c_schwaben is linked to Tirol (73) when it should probably be c_tirol linked to tirol- Rahba (2314) in EUIV is linked to d_syria and the provinces under it when it should probably be linked with c_al_bichri (Rahba in SWMH). d_syria no longer exists in SWMH.- c_druz, c_tadmor and c_suwaida should probably be de-linked from Tadmur (405) as they've been repurposed and moved elsewhere in the region. Tadmur should just be linked with c_palmyra and maybe c_salamiyah- Oberschwaben (69) in EUIV is currently just linked to c_furstenberg, which is a really small part of the province in EUIV. c_schwaben, c_waldburg, and c_hohenzollern should probably be added to the provinces that link to Oberschwaben- c_amalfi probably shouldn't link to Lucania (1934), they're nowhere near each other. c_gravina and c_marsico would probably be better choices- Albenga (2992) in EUIV is currently linked to c_genoa (since in Vanilla CK2 Genoa covers that area), when in SWMH it's part of d_savona (c_finale, c_savona, and c_ventimiglia) and should be linked to those instead.- Waldst ä tte/Schwyz (166) is currently linked to c_grisons (which is farther south in SWMH compared to vanilla) when it would be more accurately linked to c_schwyz- c_pfalz is currently only linked to Pfalz (77) (which is now Heidelberg), it should also be linked to 1761 (which is the new Pfalz province in EUIV)EDIT: And two more- c_znolmo should be delinked from Ostmarch (1770), since that province is much smaller and more to the north in SWMH. It should be replaced by c_osterreich and c_kuenring.- In TOG start conversians, Brittany gets the entirely of Normandie (168) because Normandie is only linked to two provinces; c_evreux and c_avranches, and it owns one of them. c_bayeux, c_coustance, and c_mortain should probably be added to the list of provinces that link to Normandie to add more balance.