Why oh why isn’t there any consistency left in our favorite Sports Entertainment company’s writing team? Now a days it appears that they almost deliberately twist and change the rules to suit different angles.

The most recent example is when they banned the RKO from the steel cage match between Randy Orton and Seth Rollins at the Extreme Rules PPV. While we may give them the benefit of the doubt that the ban only applied to Randy, they never specified. When Rollins used it, even the commentators were just as confused as I was.

Why is it that the DDT is a move for some while for others its just another move? Dean Ambrose uses a variation of it; the “Dirty Deeds” as his finishing move. Just about every superstar uses the DDT in their match, Dolph Ziggler’s looks much more impressive so why would it be a finishing move for one and a spot move for others.

Why is the Chokeslam a finishing move for Kane and just another move for Big Show? My opinion is that the DDT, Chokeslams, Superkicks should all be finishing moves. Another big inconsistency is regarding rematch clauses. Brock Lesnar lost the WWE World Heavyweight Championship at Wrestlemania but is expected to wait until Summerslam to have his rematch.

Currently for all we know, Daniel Bryan also has a rematch scheduled whenever he is ready. Depending on the number of times the title changes hands we might end up having an Elimination Chamber match next year involving all the superstars with rematches. So here is where I find confusing.

Three years ago when Primo and Epico lost the tag team titles and A.W. was their manager, they were duped by the latter into waiting for a chance to have their rematch until 30 days had passed. Apparently after the thirty day period their rematch clause expired. Was that rule changed? Does it only apply to the tag team titles?

WWE and World Heavyweight Championship unification. The question is how are the past winners of either titles recognized? If one has held just the World Heavyweight title like Mark Henry, is he a former WWE World Heavyweight Champion? What about the superstars who only won the WWE title like The Miz? And what about superstars who won both like John Cena? The issue is if the company recognizes the former World Heavyweight Champions and also the former WWE Champions, then for the few who won both their title reigns should both be recognized right?

At WWE TLC on Dec. 15, 2013, WWE Champion Randy Orton defeated World Heavyweight Champion John Cena to unify the two titles, melding the two most vital Championship lineages in all of Sports-Entertainment and creating the WWE World Heavyweight Title. But if you check the WWE website and see the list of all the former WWE World Heavyweight Champions, certain names are conspicuously missing.

There is no Mark Henry, Dolph Ziggler, Christian among others. And 3 of John Cena’s Heavyweight Championships are also omitted. That makes him a 12 time champion. This begs the question, why do they refer to him as a 15 time WWE World Heavyweight Champion when his Heavyweight Championships do not reflect. Why is Triple H a 13 time Champion rather than an 8 time?

In Jr’s voice But Why?? Someone tell me why dammit? WHY??”

A possible reason could be the Chris Benoit dilemma but that’s just speculation. These are just but a few examples of the inconsistencies. I just hope that they cut them out as fans are becoming all the wiser now. And they are not goldfishes either.

So reader’s let me hear from you, what idea’s do you have to make the WWE a better brand? Is there anything going on in WWE’s storylines that you like or dislike?

Hit me up on the comments below or even on my Twitter page @S_Watson1982.

By Sherron Watson



