Rep. Mike Quigley Michael (Mike) Bruce QuigleyDemocrats introduce legislation to revise FDA requirements for LGBT blood donors Tucker Carlson sparks condemnation with comments about deadly Kenosha shooting Hillicon Valley: Three arrested in Twitter hack | Trump pushes to break up TikTok | House approves 0M for election security MORE (D-Ill.) said early Thursday that special counsel Robert Mueller Robert (Bob) MuellerCNN's Toobin warns McCabe is in 'perilous condition' with emboldened Trump CNN anchor rips Trump over Stone while evoking Clinton-Lynch tarmac meeting The Hill's 12:30 Report: New Hampshire fallout MORE is “protecting” President Trump Donald John TrumpBiden on Trump's refusal to commit to peaceful transfer of power: 'What country are we in?' Romney: 'Unthinkable and unacceptable' to not commit to peaceful transition of power Two Louisville police officers shot amid Breonna Taylor grand jury protests MORE out of “extreme fairness” by not indicting him.

“The irony of yesterday was, the special counsel is an honorable person who follows the rule of law more than anyone I’ve ever witnessed,” Quigley, who sits on the House Intelligence Committee, said on CNN. "At the same time, in his moment of extreme fairness, he is protecting a president of the United States who has absolutely no concern for the rule of law, who is flaunting it."

Democratic @RepMikeQuigley says Robert Mueller should testify before Congress.



“In his moment of extreme fairness, he is protecting a President of the United States who has absolutely no concern for the rule of law who is flouting it.” https://t.co/EgMwJCcrxe pic.twitter.com/DVQdYhWqC6 — New Day (@NewDay) May 30, 2019

Quigley’s comments come a day after Mueller maintained in rare public remarks that he could not exonerate Trump of any wrongdoing and that Justice Department guidelines would have prevented him from filing any charges against the president.

Mueller said in his final report earlier this year that he did not find evidence that Trump conspired with Russia's interference in the 2016 presidential election, but that he would not make a prosecutorial decision on whether the president obstructed probes into the interference.

ADVERTISEMENT

The special counsel doubled down on his conclusion on Wednesday, saying, “If we had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said that.”

Mueller’s remarks stirred up an existing debate within the Democratic Party over whether to begin impeachment proceedings into the president. Democrats appeared united, however, in their calls for the special counsel to testify.

“I have the greatest respect for the special counsel, but he doesn’t get to decide whether or not he testifies before the American people. And he doesn’t get to decide which questions he can talk about. He clearly can’t decide that he’s only going to talk about what’s already in the report,” Quigley said on Thursday.

Mueller, however, appears reluctant to testify publicly, telling reporters Wednesday that “the report is my testimony.”