Show caption The JD Wetherspoon chain ‘needs people from all over the world to staff the business’. Photograph: Oli Scarff/Getty Images Opinion Theresa May’s immigration duplicity exposed Maya Goodfellow The prime minister knows the British economy needs migrants. And yet she still peddles her inflammatory anti-immigrant rhetoric Wed 10 May 2017 09.09 BST Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share via Email 3 years old

Theresa May is fond of making promises she knows she won’t keep. She promised there would be no early election and now we’re in the midst of one; she says a large majority in parliament will increase her Brexit negotiating power, a nonsensical claim that has no grounding in reality; and on Monday she again pledged to cut net migration to below 100,000 – a pledge she’s failed to live up to for seven years now.

Writing off the pledge doesn’t, however, grapple with the reasons for this failure. Look at what May said a little over a month ago. Before the country was gripped by election fever she admitted that she couldn’t guarantee immigration would be significantly lower after Brexit. After decades of anti-migrant rhetoric, this was one of many moments in history when a politician’s duplicity on immigration was beautifully transparent. May is unlikely to considerably reduce the number of people coming into this country. Why? Because they keep the UK economy going.

‘Politicians of all persuasions have told the public that migration is to blame for low wages – a claim Theresa May repeated on Monday. Yet all the evidence suggests this is not true.’ Photograph: Dan Kitwood/Getty Images

This truth is perhaps nowhere more apparent than if we look at Tim Martin, the founder of the JD Wetherspoon pub chain. He is what one might call a fanatical Brexiteer. Having furiously demanded that the UK leave the EU – going so far as to put this message on coasters in his many establishments across the UK – he’s begun back-pedalling on one of the key leave promises. Now he’s saying the country can’t afford to put a brake on immigration. The short explanation for this: he needs people from all over the world to staff his business.

None of this is to say that migration should merely be understood through the prism of economics. People who come to the UK should not simply be “allowed” in this country because they contribute to the economy, and their access to healthcare should not be contingent on proving their economic worth. They are human beings with ambitions, histories and personal relationships. Migration is part of life. But it must also be seen in the context of an unfair global economic system that leaves a billion people living on less than a $1.25 a day – and from which the UK benefits as people move around the globe in search of a better life.

One reason migration has caused resentment is that politicians of all persuasions have told the public that migration is to blame for low wages – a claim May repeated on Monday. Yet all the evidence suggests this is not true, to distract people from the real causes of declining living conditions: government policy, exploitative big business, and a financial elite only interested in looking after itself. May is playing divide and rule: the only way to truly “take back control” is for people, wherever they were born, to come together to demand better rights. Division, not migrants, is the problem. And the left is the only political vehicle to provide that solution.

When the government fails to deliver on an immigration pledge, it’s likely to inflame anger, which can then spill over into attacks on asylum seekers.