The NSA Is Dianne Feinstein's And Mike Rogers' Abusive, Cheating Spouse

from the you'd-think-the-head-of-an-intelligence-committee-would-know-how-to-quit-som dept

Leak reveals evidence of NSA overreach or wrongdoing. NSA issues statement explaining how leak is being misinterpreted or is an aberration. NSA attends hearings and issues statements declaring it doesn't abuse its power. (Frequently qualified with "not under this program.") New leak reveals evidence of NSA overreach or wrongdoing, proving NSA's most recent statements were pretty much "incomplete lies" or "least untruthful" answers. Repeat.

The leak-and-response cycle of the past couple months has been highly entertaining and the pattern is nearly always the same.

The most remarkable aspect of this cycle is the unwavering support Mike Rogers and Dianne Feinstein continue to provide the agency. No matter how damaging the leak or how egregious the lies, Rogers and Feinstein stand by their beloved NSA like severely co-dependent spouses, firmly believing against all available evidence that the most recently disclosed act of malfeasance will be the NSA's last.



If it weren't so sad, it would be almost comical. (Granted, it is a little comical, in part because it's so sad.)



It all began back with the first leak -- the order demanding Verizon cough up metadata on millions of customers. The response from Dianne Feinstein?

"I knew -- hell, EVERYONE knew -- about the NSA's shady past when I hooked up with it. Why's everyone so outraged?"

"Look, the NSA has had an 'interesting' life, but it's also theoretically done good things."

man

"Sure, the agency cheated, but it was, like, once a year."

NSA: "Um, don't be mad, but it was slightly more than that. But these thousands of violations meant nothing to us, baby! You gotta believe that!"

"Cheating over 2,000 times may LOOK bad, but you're not taking into account those millions of times we didn't! Perspective. That's the key."

"Leave it alone! It needs its freedom! If it doesn't have that, then it can't be the agency it wants to. You hurt not just me and the agency, but all of us when you question its actions. Stop driving us apart!"

"Shut up. You're all jealous. Just a bunch of social media know-nothings and internet freaks. You have no idea how complex the situation really is."

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community. Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis. While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

A few days later, Feinstein (and others) attempted to justify PRISM's collection efforts by claiming it had prevented the NYC subway bombing , when actual, non-defensively-deployed evidence suggested otherwise.It all came to a head a little over a week ago. Feinstein, standing by heragency, boldly declared there was no evidence the NSA had abused its powers. This was followed almost immediately by the release of information indicating the NSA had abused its power. Repeatedly.Even this failed to diminish Feinstein's devotion. Her response?Actually, it wasthan "slightly more," and even Feinstein seems to be a bit nonplussed (or at least quieter), glaring as the agency explained further:Mike Rogers' relationship with the agency seems just as needy, but his reactions are uglier. Rogers doesn't rely on swiftly debunked denials. Instead, Rogers believes theproblem is everyone else -- all these jealous haters who have it in for the agency.At first, it was just other pesky Congress members looking for details on the NSA. None of their business. This isn't their battle . Rogers is the one in the relationship and if there's anyone who should be worried, it's Rogers. And he's not worried But we're worried, Mike, they'd say. Let us in. Let us know what's going on. No deal . Then, finally, something emerges But we don't think it should be acting this way, they say. This isn't how aagency acts. This is how anagency acts.And as the evidence of wrongdoing continues to pile up, Rogers not only covers his own ears and shouts nonsensical syllables over the concerned crowd, but covers the ears of the crowd as well.The deep-seated denial continues despite thousands of violations being uncovered. Rogers may be hurt but he's not willing to kick his faithless agency to the curb. He's almost vanished completely, off composing justifications that restore the agency's trustworthiness.If nothing else, he rationalizes, the agency has just maybe prevented a bad thing or two from happening. Surely that's enough to excuse its egregious abuse of the nation's trust? Besides, it's not as if you can trust the opinion of shut-ins and Facebook users. They don't know what it's like out there in the, where everything is a big gray area.Relationships are never simple, especially for those on the inside. Feinstein and Rogers have both had their trust abused greatly by an agency they seem to worship, and that can't feel good. Unfortunately, they seem unable (or unwilling) to make a clean break, which makes one wonder exactly what it would take to separate them from the NSA, and how unfortunaterevelation would be for the citizens they're supposed to be representing.

Filed Under: co-dependency, dianne feinstein, house intelligence committee, mike rogers, nsa, nsa surveillance, senate intelligence committee