++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

_ _ __ .__

__| || |_______ _____/ |_|__| ______ ____ ____

\ __ /\__ \ / \ __\ |/ ___// __ \_/ ___\

| || | / __ \| | \ | | |\___ \\ ___/\ \___

/_ ~~ _\(____ /___| /__| |__/____ >\___ >\___ >

|_||_| \/ \/ \/ \/ \/

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

.____ .__ ____ ___

| | __ __| | ________\ \/ / _____ _____ ______

| | | | \ | \___ / \ / / \\__ \ / ___/

| |___| | / |__/ / / \| Y Y \/ __ \_\___ \

|_______ \____/|____/_____ \/___/\ \__|_| (____ /____ >

\/ \/ \_/ \/ \/ \/

.___.__ __ .__

____ __| _/|__|/ |_|__| ____ ____

_/ __ \ / __ | | \ __\ |/ _ \ / \

\ ___// /_/ | | || | | ( <_> ) | \

\___ >____ | |__||__| |__|\____/|___| /

\/ \/ \/

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Episode #...something. Stratfor eats Cocks: lurking emails.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

YEAH!!!MAILS MAILS MAILS MAILS MAILS MAILS MAILS also cocks.

>STRATFOR MAILS TEASER #2.

>ACTION!

/*

awesomeness:

1. An unmeasurable amount of awesomenimity something can produce.

urbandictionary

*/

Well hope you all enjoyed that first teaser ---> http://pastebin.com/YwazdGRZ

>.<

So here we go again. More srs shit now cause internets is srs business.

TITLE: STRATFOR ANALYZES ANONYMOUS AND WIKILEAKS

> they called us hippie arseholes :(

> and that we ll be 'hard to kill'

> .

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: scott.stewart@stratfor.com

To: analysts@stratfor.com

List Name: mailto:analysts@stratfor.com

Subject: RE: Wiki Hackers Talk to The Economist

Date: 2010-12-10 20:25:20

Content:

I also think there are more folks who are willing to be hacktivists than

those who are willing to get tear gassed or charge a police line. It is

more anonymous and less dangerous/uncomfortable.

From: analysts-bounces@stratfor.com [mailto:analysts-bounces@stratfor.com]

On Behalf Of Peter Zeihan

Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 2:21 PM

To: analysts@stratfor.com

Subject: Re: Wiki Hackers Talk to The Economist

ull never get rid of it completely -- as long as there are young people

with no assets and a perception that they've nothing to lose this will

exist

but in times when home ownership is growing and there is a perception of a

threat, the numbers of folks who will do this is very low -- while at the

same time the state's ability to deal with them is relatively high and

support in broader society is questionable at best for such anarchists

On 12/10/2010 12:51 PM, Chris Farnham wrote:

And what happens if your core are people in Chicago, Oslo, Aukland, Perth,

Munich, Gothenburg, etc. who are not afraid and are only two years out of

college working for a marketing company and their biggest financial

liability is your AT&T monthly invoice?

As I said, these guys are not yet a major destabilising force, but you

look at the human flesh search engines in China, they unsettle the Party

on a monthly basis with their ability track, identify, locate and out

whatever target takes their interest and that has included Party members

in the past.

Wikileaks is a big deal in the world of the anti-establishment and the

network based activists, it has displayed potential to strike at the

established powers via information proliferation hand in hand with the

conventional media. That's power and Anon has now latched on to the

bandwagon. These guys have already crossed from net based activism to

physical world activism, it has already happened at a very small level.

As I said, the core may not be the danger but the fanatical fringe amongst

them are knowledgeable, motivated, organised and spread across the world

with a non-state, nihilistic agenda. Sounds somewhat familiar, no?

I'm not saying that this shit is going down. I'm saying that there is

significant potential there and to ignore it could be quite a mistake

because if it doesn't make anything of itself, as Mike Mooney has said, it

has created a wonderful template for others who may be more determined.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: "Peter Zeihan"

To: analysts@stratfor.com

Sent: Saturday, December 11, 2010 2:35:25 AM

Subject: Re: Wiki Hackers Talk to The Economist

yeah - its always there, but there are two trends in western soceities

that have traditionally kept it weak for the past few decades: rising home

ownership and the presence of an enemy

if ur afraid you want a strong state, and if you have a mortgage you don't

riot

On 12/10/2010 12:31 PM, Marko Papic wrote:

Agreed completely. They have definitely toned done and terrorism has lost

its cool "edge" after 9-11.

But things go in waves... I mean there is nothing new about anarchism. I

would argue it is hormonal. You can't ever really weed it out, it is not

purely ideological. You are always going to find young men who think they

are destined for greatness.

On 12/10/10 12:23 PM, scott stewart wrote:

Yes, but....

The anarchist movement had generated a lot of momentum in the physical

world around the time of the millennium with the battle in Seattle, London

May Day and the WEF violence in Davos. They lost a lot of steam after

9/11.

We still have yet to see them regain the mass, momentum and numbers they

had a decade ago. WTO and G-7 meetings are far more peaceful.

From: analysts-bounces@stratfor.com [mailto:analysts-bounces@stratfor.com]

On Behalf Of Marko Papic

Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 1:13 PM

To: analysts@stratfor.com

Subject: Re: Wiki Hackers Talk to The Economist

I agree with Chris.

We have to be aware that "anarchism" has deep deep roots in history and

has been violent in many ways many times.

I am afraid, for example, that all the anti-globalization people in Europe

are looking to hitch a new wagon. I am worried that the protests in the UK

and all this net anarchism activity could somehow bizzarly get connected.

I have no real evidence, but I do think that is potential for net

anarchism to get its real world anarchist equivalent.

I think we need to consider what Chris is saying very seriously. The cross

over into physical/real life is a serious potential.

On 12/10/10 11:51 AM, Chris Farnham wrote:

I watch anon and /b/ and have done for a while now (no I do not chan).

There are some interesting crossovers with AQ and the

decentralization/motivation of ideology. I don't think they have yet

reached a point where they have become a cogent threat to security.

However this wikileaks thing has the potential to be a catalyst for them.

A web based subversive entity has just rocked the world for two weeks,

that's dynamite for these guys.

The chaners/anon/b are educated and at the leading edge of network based

technology, have a nebulous structure of loyal people spread through the

world with no nationalistic foundations bit drawn together under a shared

interest in chaos (hentai and cats, for fuck sake). There are numerous

examples where they have uncovered identities and all personal details of

people based on a single photo (of a woman putting a cat in a garbage bin,

for example) and bought some serious vigilanty style justice to those they

disagree with. They have also crossed over into the physical/real life

world a number of times.

These guys are on the same level as the Chinese human flesh seach engines

and quite possibly the cyber warfare units of many developed countries

today.

Most importantly, for the US at least, I have noted a number of militant

libertarians within their periphery.

It's going to be very interesting to watch what anon does in the

'post-wilileaks' environment. If they move from a bunch of tech geeks in

mum's basement into a real movement they could cause serious trouble and

be hard to kill. The coresy not be the problem but the few unhinged among

them could prove to be quite destructive if so inclined.

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 11, 2010, at 1:25, Fred Burton wrote:

These global hippies and arseholes are like CHAOS or THRUSH.

Fred Burton wrote:

http://www.economist.com/blogs/babbage/2010/12/more_wikileaks

I am talking to members of a group called "Anonymous", using a web-based

collaborative text-editing service. It is the first such interview for

all of us, and their answers begin to collide on the page. One member

comes from Norway; another shows surprise, then offers that she is from

New Zealand. Another writes that group members come from Nepal and

Eastern Russia. They all speak through pseudonyms, but I don't even know

which psuedonym comes from what country because shortly after I read

these answers, someone who calls himself "Tux" erases them all and writes

--

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Marko Papic

Geopol Analyst - Eurasia

STRATFOR

700 Lavaca Street - 900

Austin, Texas

78701 USA

P: + 1-512-744-4094

marko.papic@stratfor.com

--

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Marko Papic

Geopol Analyst - Eurasia

STRATFOR

700 Lavaca Street - 900

Austin, Texas

78701 USA

P: + 1-512-744-4094

marko.papic@stratfor.com

--

Chris Farnham

Senior Watch Officer, STRATFOR

China Mobile: (86) 1581 1579142

Email: chris.farnham@stratfor.com

www.stratfor.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

:3

#ROFLMAOAPMP

penis penis