Fri Dec 23, 2016 9:23 am

The problem I have with KeepKey is the company got a free ride off Trezor's back. Instead of using a different approach to hardware wallets like Ledger did KeepKey just took the Trezor code and forked it. Sure the KeepKey looks different and the company made some proprietary changes to the code but under the hood a KeepKey hardware wallet is really just a rebranded Trezor. I think the innovators in this space should be rewarded, not the copiers.



Ledger is actually becoming the leader in hardware wallets. They started as Avis to Trezor's Hertz. They tried harder and are succeeding. The Ledger Nano S really gives up nothing in comparison to Trezor. Next year will be exciting as we wait to see what the Trezor2 will offer in comparison to Ledger's flagship product Ledger Blue. Competition is good for everyone.

Yep. Competition will bring down prices, and bring up the features.So far, no device has come near the Ledger Blue. The device however is still in it's prototyping stages, so there's still time for a competitor. The closes thing currently is Case, a bitcoin wallet that has access to the internet wherever it goes. The only problem is that the only way to input a bitcoin address is through QR code.I'm using a Ledger HW.1 and I love it.