The Football Association's failure to reform is to be debated at the House of Commons next week after a motion of 'no confidence' in the governing body.

MPs will examine whether the FA can "comply fully with its duties".

Whether reform is impossible within the FA's structure will be looked at on Thursday, 9 February and new laws may be proposed.

In July, sports minister Tracey Crouch said the FA would lose its £30m to £40m of public funding if it did not reform.

Then, in December, Crouch said that the government would bring in legislation to force through reforms if the governing body did not make changes itself.

The Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee has been looking at the FA's failure to reform as part of its ongoing inquiry into football governance. Committee chairman Damian Collins MP revealed on Friday that the FA had been given six months to meet the government guidance on best practice for sports governance but had failed to do so.

That guidance called for things such as a move towards gender equality on boards, more independent oversight, more accountability and term limits for office bearers.

Collins said: "We do not believe the FA will comply voluntarily: it can survive easily without the government's contribution of money to grassroots sport, and there are powerful vested interests that refuse to accept the right of all those involved in football to play a role in the governance of the sport.

"We are therefore preparing a draft bill to bring the structure of the FA, especially its board and council, more into line with modern company practice and the government's guidelines for sports bodies."

What do the FA say?

"We are aware of the discussions next week. The government announced a code for governance for sports' governing bodies last year and we are working to their timeline for implementation later in the year.

"Football, like all sports, is following due process and we remain committed to working with the government towards compliance with the code."

How did it get to this point?

Damian Collins MP: 'We no longer have any confidence'

The motion comes after five former FA executives said the governing body had failed to "self-reform".

In a letter to committee chairman Collins, David Bernstein, David Davies, Greg Dyke, Alex Horne and David Triesman described it as outdated, held back by "elderly white men" and unable to counter the power of the Premier League.

Among the points made by the five former FA executives are:

The Premier League's financial power has a knock-on effect "right through the football pyramid".

The FA is compelled to contribute tens of millions of pounds to the Premier League, rather than the grassroots of the game.

The majority of those in senior positions are under-qualified to deal with the complexities of the FA structures.

The FA Board is neither an independent board nor an independent regulator.

Collins responded by saying the committee "shares your concern" and confirmed a draft bill to deliver the necessary reform was being prepared.

And in an interview with the BBC in December, the committee chairman added that: "We feel now that time has run out. We no longer have any confidence that the FA can or will reform itself."

Any other issues?

While Collins and his select committee may draft legislation, it would still need government backing for it to be passed - and previous governments have not previously showed signs of supporting any new law to enforce reform.

Furthermore, football's world governing body Fifa has rules stating football associations must be "independent and avoid any form of political interference".

Fifa has taken action on government's interfering in the affairs of other football associations in the past.

Greg Dyke: Premier League is a cartel

Analysis

BBC Radio 5 live sports news correspondent Richard Conway

The committee is ratcheting up the pressure by bringing this debate. It has grown weary of the FA failing, as it sees it, to modernise sufficiently.

Football's own parliament, the FA Council, is seen as grossly unrepresentative of those involved in the game. The FA board has one female representative in Heather Rabbatts but the hope is that will soon change - two additional women are expected to join an expanded 14-person board by the summer.

Negotiations and implementing reforms within the Council may be trickier, though.

FA officials will sit down with the government in April to show their plans and a timeline for achieving them, as mandated by last year's Code of Sports Governance. At risk is their funding and, potentially, financial guarantees from Whitehall to bid for future World Cups or the European Championship.

Next week's debate will undoubtedly antagonise relations between the FA and MPs.

Privately, there's a degree of frustration and anger within Wembley over being labelled as, effectively, not fit for purpose. To that end, it hasn't gone unnoticed by some that the committee of MPs calling for change currently constitutes one woman, 10 men and has no black and minority ethnic representatives.

Senior figures do admit there is plenty of work to be done to improve diversity within English football governance. But they are also proud - and will defend - their work on inclusion, investing money, improving grassroots facilities and promoting the sport at all levels.