Dear Mr Vopper,



You are absolutely correct that the interview with Julian Assange was on the 30th of August 17:43 - 18:37 and not on the 31st as David Allen Green stated. You are also correct in mentioning that Julian Assange was not informed of all allegations against him at the time for the interview. It was not until 1st September that most of the allegations (rape, sexual molestation) were known. I made a mistake of not pointing it out since I did not think it made much of a difference. But you are correct. One up to you.



I don't know how much you know about the geography of Sweden. But it is important. Excuse me if I am pointing out the obvious. The alleged rape did not occur in Uppsala as Naomi Wolf claims. It happened in Enköping. The crime was first reported to Klara Närpolisstation in Stockholm and was investigated by City Åklagarkammare in Stockholm. When the case was re-opened it's been investigated by Västerorts Åklagarkammare in Solna, a suburb of Stockholm.



As I thought you immediately noticed in my first comment, the Uppsala police force has never been involved in the Assange investigation as Naomi Wolf claims. And I can assure you, it never will. Is this important? Naomi Wolf's claim is that the Uppsala police force does not seriously investigate rape. And since they don't it is proof that the case against Assange is extraordinary. Do you now see that her one of her central allegations is false?



When I spoke to a friend of mine about this she said with a sigh:

"Yeah, I met Naomi in my school in '96,

she was master at stating the obvious,

now -------------- the imaginary".



If you can be so kind to read the post below and point out what facts you think are incorrect I would be very happy.



http://samtycke.nu/eng/2012/09/checking-naomi-wolfs-8-big-problems-in-the-assange-case-and-coming-up-empty/

