Bill Black: More Proof of Obama Policy of Covering Up for Elite Financial Criminals



http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2012/01/bill-black-more-proof-of-obama-policy-of-covering-up-for-elite-financial-criminals.html



The New York Times published a column by its leading financial experts, Gretchen Morgenson and Louise Story, on November 22, 2011 which contains a spectacular charge against the Obama administrations financial regulatory leaders. I have waited for the rebuttal, but it is now clear that the administration does not contest the charge.



The specific example that prompted the NYT article (Financial Finger-Pointing Turns to Regulators) was a civil action against a former executive of IndyMac. IndyMac was supposed to be regulated by the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS). OTS was the worst of the federal financial regulators  which is a large statement. It was so bad that the Dodd-Frank Act killed it. I used to work for OTS. One of the things I did to make myself unemployable during the S&L debacle was to testify before Congress against the head of our agency, Danny Wall, and our head of supervision, Darrell Dochow. Wall resigned in disgrace and Dochow was demoted and sent back to run the obscure office he had once run in Seattle.



Ms. Story and Ms. Morgensons column discusses how an IndyMac manager is defending himself against suit by arguing that Dochow told him to file false financial statements. OTS senior leaders knew from my book exactly what they were getting when they promoted Dochow and made him the top (anti) regulator for all the top S&L originators of fraudulent liars loans.



This column addresses a more general point, the charge that Obamas financial regulatory leaders actively oppose the prosecution of elite financial criminals and the regulators who conspired with them (to use the term the article quotes Professor Kane as insisting upon). more at linkThe New York Times published a column by its leading financial experts, Gretchen Morgenson and Louise Story, on November 22, 2011 which contains a spectacular charge against the Obama administrations financial regulatory leaders. I have waited for the rebuttal, but it is now clear that the administration does not contest the charge.The specific example that prompted the NYT article (Financial Finger-Pointing Turns to Regulators) was a civil action against a former executive of IndyMac. IndyMac was supposed to be regulated by the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS). OTS was the worst of the federal financial regulators  which is a large statement. It was so bad that the Dodd-Frank Act killed it. I used to work for OTS. One of the things I did to make myself unemployable during the S&L debacle was to testify before Congress against the head of our agency, Danny Wall, and our head of supervision, Darrell Dochow. Wall resigned in disgrace and Dochow was demoted and sent back to run the obscure office he had once run in Seattle.Ms. Story and Ms. Morgensons column discusses how an IndyMac manager is defending himself against suit by arguing that Dochow told him to file false financial statements. OTS senior leaders knew from my book exactly what they were getting when they promoted Dochow and made him the top (anti) regulator for all the top S&L originators of fraudulent liars loans.This column addresses a more general point, the charge that Obamas financial regulatory leaders actively oppose the prosecution of elite financial criminals and the regulators who conspired with them (to use the term the article quotes Professor Kane as insisting upon). 17 Tweet