‘A huge embarrassment for Scottish football’ - Celtic slam SFA decision to clear Rangers’ Jon Flanagan

Celtic have branded the Jon Flanagan disciplinary matter a “huge embarrassment for Scottish football” after the Rangers defender escaped a two-match ban for elbowing Scott Brown.

By The Newsroom Friday, 17th May 2019, 7:49 pm

Rangers defender Jon Flanagan during a training session at the Hummel Training Centre. Picture: SNS Group

Flanagan was initially yellow-carded for the incident but later issued with a retrospective ban after three former match officials declared his offence violent conduct after it was re-examined by Scottish Football Association compliance officer Clare Whyte.

However, Rangers challenged that assessment and an independent panel dismissed the case following an SFA disciplinary hearing.

Celtic: Get the latest team news, match previews and reports Celtic: Get the latest team news, match previews and reports Sign up Thanks for signing up! Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting...

A Celtic spokesperson said: “This whole matter is a huge embarrassment for Scottish football.”

Rangers defender Jon Flanagan during a training session at the Hummel Training Centre. Picture: SNS Group

Rangers welcomed the ruling but added a caveat.

An Ibrox spokesman said: “Obviously we have concerns about the process but we are happy that the correct decision has been upheld.”

Rangers had earlier criticised the SFA for getting involved after referee Kevin Clancy opted to book Flanagan after the full-back hit out at Brown as the pair awaited a Celtic corner.

Celtic manager Neil Lennon had argued the offence was a blatant red card but their city rivals vowed to defend their player “vigorously” while also questioning why Hoops defender Jozo Simunovic had also not been issued with a notice of complaint following an off-the-ball collision with Jermain Defoe.

Press Association Sport understands that the compliance officer also referred the Simunovic incident to the three former match officials but there was no unanimous agreement that he should have been sent off.

Rangers had condemned the outcome of the SFA’s initial response on Tuesday.

A statement read: “Once again, there seems intent to change the decision of a referee in a match involving Rangers.

“There seems to be a steady erosion of respect for Scotland’s referees and the authority they are meant to enjoy under rule five of the laws of the game.

“The decisions of referees regarding facts connected with play are meant to be final, but referees are now routinely invited to change their decisions after a game has finished.

“It is particularly shocking that another Rangers player has been singled out for retrospective action and issued with a notice of complaint, while Jozo Simunovic, the Celtic player who used an elbow to fell Jermain Defoe, has escaped any kind of censure.

“Why did one incident escape punishment while the other is now deemed worthy of a red card?

“We cannot understand how these two incidents could be studied yet only one be considered worthy of punishment.

“It seems as if Rangers’ players are being held to a different code of conduct from players at other clubs.