• Oregon college’s “Whiteness History Month” an attack on Caucasian race and culture.

By Ronald L. Ray —

Portland Community College (PCC) claims to be Oregon’s “largest post-secondary educational institution.” It may also be the Beaver State’s largest educational fraud, promoting not knowledge but Soviet-style propaganda.

The college recently announced a “Whiteness History Month” for April 2016. Not a celebratory “White History Month,” like all the months for blacks, Mexicans, Pacific Islanders, and even homosexuals, but rather a month dedicated to attacking “whiteness”—the supposed “social construct” that allegedly allows whites to dominate their darker-skinned neighbors.

PCC is not the first college to foray into what could be called “white deracialization”—akin to post-World-War-II propagandistic “denazification”—but really is something closer to attempted white deracination, i.e., the extirpation of the Caucasian race.







Oregon’s Portland State University offers an entire course on “white privilege” that “endeavor[s] to make whiteness strange,” because “to preserve whiteness is to preserve racial injustice.” The University of Alabama-Birmingham, University of Southern California, and Bingham ton University, among others, also offer racially bigoted anti-white courses.

“Whiteness History Month” has garnered significant media attention, perhaps due to its surreal parallel to other “heritage” months. The organizing committee has made clear its intent, however, even if its use of language lacks both terminological accuracy and intellectual honesty. Consider the following two definitions posted at its “What is Whiteness” web page, for instance:

White, as a term describing people, refers to light skinned people of European descent. Whiteness refers to the construction of the white race, white culture, and the system of privileges and advantages afforded to white people in the U.S. (and across the globe) through government policies, media portrayal, decision-making power within our corporations, schools, judicial systems, etc.

The first definition is scientifically imprecise and, although perhaps intended as non-controversial, already reflects the authors’ racial and political bias. “Light-skinned” potentially can include lighter shades of brown or yellow—and in fact does, when darker-skinned haters demand it. This was revealed at more than one “Black Lives Matter” event, where Asian-Americans were harassed for being over-achievers.

The description also ignores key components of race written into our very genes. Apart from potentially controversial aspects like average intelligence, aggressiveness, and creativity, it ignores traits such as skull shape, lactose tolerance, and variations in hair and eye color found only in white DNA. And it ignores the many non-Europeans who obviously, although somewhat racially mixed, are largely Caucasian: e.g., Syrians, Iranians, Afghans, the upper castes in India, and even the Berbers of North Africa.

The definition of “whiteness,” however, is the pin pulled from the hand grenade in this society-destroying “Whiteness History” project. According to the organizers: “The project seeks to challenge the master narrative of race and racism through an exploration of the social construction of whiteness. Challenging the master narrative of traditional curriculum is a strategy within higher education that promotes multicultural education and equity.”

What all this high-sounding gobbledygook is saying is that whites of a former time constructed societal laws and constraints that purportedly—or in some limited circumstances, truly—gave institutional disadvantages to other races. As a consequence, just the fact of being born white makes a person a “racist,” because he inherits a society that supposedly favors his ability to achieve greater things than non-whites.

But this ignores differing, statistically identifiable strengths and weaknesses of all races and, ultimately, dishonors all. In truth , the anti-white racism of “whiteness studies” is just rehashed Marxism. Whites are portrayed as the elites and petite bourgeoisie, while non-whites are the allegedly oppressed proletariat.







Class war is fomented by Saul-Alinskyite “social justice” activities. Just as in the French and Russian revolutions, the end goal is the destruction of society and white cultural achievements. The present propaganda war precedes the anarchy and white genocide that will follow. But, following the “whiteness” definition, whichever non-whites come out on top will be the new “white” oppressors, no matter the darkness of their skin. It is successful achievement that these people envy and hate most. All must be equally poor.

The terminology of “whiteness history” also ignores present reality—the radical, systematic discrimination against whites, especially white men, in all areas: education, employment, sports, politics, etc. Non-white invaders can flood Europe, but not white refugees from Zionist-destroyed Ukraine. Wealthy blacks in suburban Atlanta, Georgia, can exclude whites from buying homes in their neighborhoods, but not vice versa.

Whites are a minority of government workers, although 80%-90% of the population. White men have been disparaged by the entertainment and advertising industries for a century.

PCC Interim President Sylvia Kelley claimed in a statement that, “PCC’s event is intended to enable a rich and engaging exchange of ideas. . . . There is no intention, as some may have feared, to ‘shame or blame’ anyone.”

We doubt that. Shaming and blaming are fundamental components of the social construct of “whiteness history.” We doubt also that any white nationalists, or even proud whites, will be allowed to speak openly or without harassment.

It is not justice that these anti-white racists seek. It is revenge. Stop the escalating cycle of hatred against whites. Stop white genocide. Protest to PCC now.

Ronald L. Ray is a freelance author and an assistant editor of THE BARNES REVIEW. He is a descendant of several patriots of the American War for Independence.