Beijing issues new rules requiring users to give their real names to ISPs, while billing the restrictions as necessary to combat spam and protect individuals' personal information.

China is putting the clamps down on anonymous and pseudonymous Internet activity while billing severe new restrictions on Internet use by Chinese citizens as necessary to combat spam and protect individuals' personal information.

New regulations issued by Beijing on Friday require Internet users to give their full, real names to Internet service providers and call on ISPs to delete "forbidden postings and report them to the government," according to The New York Times . The Chinese government and its proxies have been on a hair trigger of late with regards to Web activity deemed dangerous, for example, to Google-run sites and services in November.

China's new regulations for ISPs, defined as "[a]ny entity providing Internet access, including over fixed-line or mobile phones," require them to "demand that users provide true information about their identities" when contracting for Internet services, thereported.

Under the new rules, Chinese Internet users will still be able to post pseudonymously on China's thriving message boards, microblogging sites, and other popular online forums, according to media reports. But with their names registered with government-regulated ISPs now under orders to police user activity more thoroughly, that may prove to be a flimsy layer of protection for online dissidents and others who fall short of towing the Beijing party line.

China already has a long record of censoring Internet activity in the country. The government has been known to block access to foreign websites and shut down domestic sites, scrub unwelcome political content and comments, and even arrest individuals for Internet activity deemed counter to the country's interests.

Some in China were defending the new Internet regulations on Friday. A China Daily op-ed called them a way to "bring order and rules to China's cyberspace."

But critics viewed the new rules as not just threatening to political dissidents but also as potentially crippling to businesses seeking to protect commercial secrets, thenoted.

There may also be plain old economics at least partially at the root of China's battles with big foreign Internet companies like Google, though most believe that Beijing's censorship crusades are mainly conducted for political reasons.

Google has had a rather tumultuous relationship with Chinese officials in recent years. In January 2010, Google said there were to hack into the Gmail accounts of Chinese human rights activists. At the time, Google pledged to no longer censor search results in China, even if that meant pulling out of the country entirely, and re-routed all Google.cn traffic to the uncensored Google.com.hk.

Unsurprisingly, a Chinese minister warned of if Google continued redirecting its results. Finally, the two parties so that Google could maintain its presence there.

But as watchdog group GreatFire.org has noted, China's November blocking of Google sites came in the context of new homegrown competition for the search giant. Google is now the second most popular search engine in China behind Baidu, though it remains among the top five most used websites in the country on a daily basis, according to Alexa stats.

Meanwhile, though the Chinese government has actually acted on a desire to know the identities of Internet users, similar sentiments have been expressed recently by some U.S. lawmakers in the wake of high-profile cyberbullying incidents.

In May, a few New York lawmakers put forward a bill seeking to ban anonymous commenting on the Internet, but that effort was .