Dalit scholars have lambasted the RSS for justifying the ban — now revoked -- on a Dalit students’ body in IIT-Madras through claims that educational campuses are inflicted with wide range of ‘red’ ideology.

In its latest editorial, the RSS mouthpiece Organiser claims that Dr. Ambedkar would not have approved of forums such as the Ambedkar-Periyar Study Circle and that he had declared himself an “enemy of the communists.”

“Educational campuses are inflicted with “red ideology that has used forums such as APSC to propagate anti-Hindu and anti-Bharat divisive ideology, which Dr. Ambedkar would have never approved,” the Organiser said. Whether Dr. Ambedkar adhered to all tenets of Hindutva was a matter of discussion and debate, it added, what “needs to be paid attention to was that he declared he was a confirmed enemy of the communists.”

Lashing out at the RSS for “creating confusion” over Dr. Ambedkar, political analyst and writer Anand Teltumbde said the APSC was in no way “red” and it would be “beyond ridiculous” and it was “idiotic” to say Dr. Ambedkar was an enemy of the communists. Though Dr. Ambedkar had “serious reservations regarding the theoretical framework” of Marxism, he was “attracted” to the empirical goals of Marx, Dr. Teltumbde said. Prakash Ambedkar, grandson of Dr. Ambedkar, said the leader had “never declared” that he was an enemy of the communists and pointed out his academic initiative in holding parliamentary forums in colleges.

Scholars pointed out that in one of his major final speeches, ‘Buddha or Karl Marx,’ in Kathmandu, Dr. Ambedkar had spoken at length about and compared Buddha and Marx. Dr. Ambedkar agreed with Marx on various fronts and supported Marxian ideas except that of class wars, said noted Dalit scholar Kancha Ilaiah. “Dr. Ambedkar was for socialism and equality…he favoured state-socialism. He was not owned by anyone, not even the Left. Ambedkar and Periyar were autonomous,” Mr. Ilaiah said.

“Would Ambedkar have banned or allowed the banning of dissenting ideas? Prime Minister Narendra Modi talks of development, but where will the ideas for it come from? Universities are places where ideas need to be developed and experimented,” Mr. Ilaiah said.

The editorial titled “Unmasking Pseudo Ambedkarities,” which remarkably begins with Dr. Ambedkar’s disapproval of Brahmanism, takes pot shots at the Congress for misusing national icons and terms its vice-president Rahul Gandhi turning to Babasaheb’s birthplace “a farce.” The Organiser claimed that the APSC case and Mr. Gandhi turning to Dr. Ambedkar’s birth memorial were “attempts to mask great nationalist reformers like Babasaheb with communist garb of class divisions or Congress’ way of vote bank politics.”