Once again – the occasion this time being the manufactured crisis surrounding the Rockefeller-patented Zika virus – the mainstream press furnishes readers with an example of how Hollywood perception management furthers the purposes of the technocratic planners and prostitutes and the sado-corporate puppet masters retaining their services. “Americans Want Congress to Dedicate Funds to Fight Zika,” declares USA Today’s Susan Page in an article syndicated in newspapers across the country:

“It does scare me,” said Carol Fisher, 56, a nurse from Teaneck, N.J., who was among those called in the poll. “It has the potential to blow up in a worldwide problem with the way people travel. The idea of containing this to a neighborhood in Miami is just ridiculous. It’s almost like that movie Contagion, where it keeps going and going and going.” (The 2011 medical thriller tracked a mysterious and deadly disease that spread worldwide after a Minnesota woman returned from a business trip to Hong Kong.)1

Note that the article quotes a nurse, who, however, resorts to evoking in readers’ imaginations a movie’s scenes of bio-horror rather than actual scientific evidence. The film features a scene of opulent hedonist Gwyneth Paltrow’s skull being sawed open for an autopsy. Are the remainder of the nation’s craniums slated for airing as well? Perhaps in pursuit of just such an end, Page’s panic-mongering USA Today attention-grabber continues:

Three in 10 Americans, including 36% of those who live in the South, the most affected region, say concern about Zika has affected travel or other plans by themselves or family members. Both Democrats and Republicans were inclined to back additional funding to combat Zika.2

James Spounias, a journalist and skeptic of the medical establishment, wonders if the cure America’s technocrats prescribe for Zika might not be more deleterious than the virus itself:

On Aug. 4, Miami officials ordered the spraying of naled, an organophosphate pesticide, to kill Zika-carrying mosquitos in the artsy Wynwood district of Miami. Wynwood had several individuals who were said to carry Zika. Some local residents, however, were outraged when they discovered that naled is banned by the European Union as causing an ‘unacceptable risk to human health,’ because it is in a class of pesticides that have dangerous side effects. […] A devastating irony is that birth defects – the very thing that naled is supposed to curb by killing Zika-carrying mosquitos – are a side effect of organophosphates. […] Is Zika hysteria fueled for propaganda purposes, such as distraction from other events, or to serve as a sort of soft mind-control weapon by keeping people in a perpetual state of terror and fear? Or is Zika mania laying the groundwork for implementation of Big Government, pharma, and chemical solutions that will rip away at our liberty, health, and treasure?3

Whatever the actual nature of Zika’s threat to the public health and civil order of the United States, readers are hereby advised to thoroughly wash after contact with newspapers, David Rockefeller, Gwyneth Paltrow, or any of the various objects peddled through her website.

Rainer Chlodwig von K.

Endnotes

Page, Susan. “Americans Want Congress to Dedicate Funds to Fight Zika”. Springfield News-Leader (September 6, 2016), p. 1B. Ibid. Spounias, James. “Zika: Cure Worse Than the Disease”. American Free Press vol. 16, no. 35/36 (August 29, 2016), p. 22.