The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

The entire point of the Civil War was to end slavery, right? Not exactly, and definitely not at the beginning of the War. The North went to war strictly to save the Union and had little interest in abolishing slavery in the South. The Emancipation Proclamation of 1863 only came about due to a complex convergence of political, social, and cultural interests.

This podcast episode is part 8 of a series that historians Scott Rank and James Early are doing called “A History of the Civil War in 10 Battles.” We look at the reasons that the Emancipation Proclamation happened, the tipping point that made abolition turn from something unthinkable in early America to a rallying cry for the North, and the factors that make wide-scale social change possible.

Background

Emancipation and War Goals For the first 18 months of the war, slavery was in the background for the North. The North went to war strictly to save the Union. As long as saving the Union was the only war aim, there was a great sense of unity in the North. Soon, however, there was a growing debate about what type of Union there would be after the war: with or without slavery. Related to this: would the war be a limited war aimed at bringing the South to negotiations, or would it be an all-out war aimed at remaking the South in the image of the North? Attitudes in 1861 In his inaugural address in March 1861 and again in July of that year, Lincoln reaffirmed his campaign promise to not interfere with slavery where it already existed. Congress also passed a resolution (almost unanimously) that summer saying the same thing. Part of Lincoln’s (and Congress’) motivation was to not alienate the border states. Lincoln personally hated slavery, but he had to move very slowly to restrict it. The majority of northerners agreed: they did not like slavery, but they did not care to interfere with it in the South. The Republican Party Conservatives wanted slavery to end eventually, but only very gradually, and voluntarily. The wanted to tie it to colonization. Moderates (including Lincoln) wanted to end slavery sooner than the conservatives, but not immediately. They feared a race war and other problems if the slaves were freed too quickly. Some also favored colonization. As the war progressed, some moved toward the radical position. Radicals wanted slavery ended immediately. They wanted emancipation as a war aim from the beginning. They were a minority in the party but were very vocal and aggressive. They were disproportionately represented in the House and Senate.

4. Democrats

1. Nearly all Democrats opposed emancipation.

Colonization

This idea went back well into the 18th century. Some wanted it for racist reasons. Others (like Lincoln) were in favor of it because they felt that blacks and whites could never function together in society together. Lincoln’s Meeting with Black Leaders Lincoln met with a group of black leaders trying to convince them of the necessity of colonization. He asked for volunteers to go. The black leaders said no. Robert Purvis wrote to Lincoln “It is in vain you talk to me of two races and their mutual antagonism. In the matter of rights, there is but one race, and that is the human race. Sir, this is our country as much as it is yours, and we will not leave it.” Frederick Douglass criticized Lincoln for hypocrisy. One Colonization Attempt In April of 1863, a group of about 500 blacks volunteered to immigrate to Haiti. Once they arrived, disease swept through the colony. A year later, they asked to be returned to the US. In April 1864 a US ship picked them up and brought them back. Only 368 survived. This was the end of talk of colonization. Self-Emancipation Tens of thousands of slaves ran away to Union Army lines (maybe up to half a million). This forced the US Army and government to come up with a solution to the problem of slaves in the South. Runaways weakened the Confederate economy.

Specific Anti-Slavery Efforts