On Monday, we wrote about how the new site UnskewedPolls manipulates data in order to produce the message they want.

Here, we have the chart that shows why they're doing this all wrong.

Basically, what UnskewedPolls does is take a poll and look at the partisan percentage split that the poll reports from the random sample. This could be, for instance, a 33 percent Democrat, 28 percent Republican, and 39 percent independent breakdown.

Then, they somehow weight the data so that what comes out is what the sample would look like if the Democrat/Republican/Independent percentages were equal to the results found by Rasmussen Reports in the single month of August— 35.4 percent Republican, 34 percent Democrat, and 30.5 percent Independent.

The resulting number comes out overwhelmingly favorable for Mitt Romney.

Using figures from Talking Points Memo's excellent polling database, we looked at sixty polls from the past two years that surveyed what the partisan split of the United States was.

These polls found an average of 32.2 percent Democrats and 24.4 percent Republicans taken as a whole.

We plotted the partisan split of each poll here. You'll observe that there are two polls which seem to disagree with the data — one is a Bloomberg Poll from this past week, the other is an New York Times/CBS poll from October 2011.

The red plot point is the Rasmussen Reports poll that has formed the basis for the UnskewedPolls.com analysis. You'll observe that it disagrees substantially from a two-year record of a statistically significant number of polls.

Essentially, the source of the partisan split for the UnskewedPolls.com shift is substantially different from the consensus area.

Were UnskewedPolls.com to use an aggregation of Rasmussen Party Identification polls they could make a compelling argument perhaps, but cherry picking a single favorable dataset to coordinate your analysis is poor form.

For now — or at least until the group can justify its analysis — UnskewedPolls is suspect at best.