Call @ 9:30pm

From:pir@hrcoffice.com To: more kristinakschake@gmail.com, nmerrill@hrcoffice.com, huma@hrcoffice.com, john.podesta@gmail.com, john@algpolling.com, cheryl.mills@gmail.com jennifer.m.palmieri@gmail.com, jbenenson@bsgco.com, gruncom@aol.com, robbymook2015@gmail.com, hsamuelson@cdmillsgroup.com, Jim.Margolis@gmmb.com KTurner@wc.com Date: 2015-03-07 22:20 Subject: Call @ 9:30pm

We're on hold with any paper going out tonight, and we need to reconvene @ 9:30pm‎. Robby I'm volunteering your #: (202) 765-0457 x 55421# For everyone’s awareness on timing, we won’t have approval on the statement or q&a before 6pm at earliest, after she is off stage. But at least it will get done tonight. As for updated q&a it’s being reviewed, will try to circulate it for feedback soon but once it passes muster there might not be much wiggle room. But we tried to incorporate everyone’s feedback from the call, and will not hit send before you all can see it and have the chance to flag any glaring problems. Roger that. Thank you Sent from my iPhone On Mar 7, 2015, at 4:51 PM, Philippe Reines <pir@hrcoffice.com<mailto:pir@hrcoffice.com>> wrote: We are getting her approval. I will be crystal clear when there is a final and for safety Heather or I will send the final clearly marked as such. Do we consider this statement final? Does that mean we are good to go or are we making changes to the q and a? Sent from my iPhone On Mar 7, 2015, at 4:15 PM, Joel Benenson <jbenenson@bsgco.com<mailto:jbenenson@bsgco.com>> wrote: I'm good with these edits. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 7, 2015, at 2:54 PM, Mandy Grunwald <gruncom@aol.com<mailto:gruncom@aol.com>> wrote: Comments from Margolis and me are tracked in the attached. We have a couple minor language edits. Our big suggestion is to cut the "bemused" paragraph about HRC's relationship to technology. This seems more appropriate for HRC to say in person than on paper. Additionally, we worry that the word "bemused" will drive "this is no laughing matter" reactions. thanks Mandy Grunwald Grunwald Communications 202 973-9400 ----- My edits attached. The one thing in here I feel strongly about is that she NOT include the part about meeting with other former secretaries and that they told her she should do this. I recognize that the boss will have to approve, but if she wants to include that, I'd say we should discuss with her. I worry it opens a major can of worms and deflects the heat in a potentially unhelpful way. On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Heather Samuelson <hsamuelson@cdmillsgroup.com<mailto:hsamuelson@cdmillsgroup.com>> wrote: All: Per our call today, attached is the DRAFT statement. As a reminder, this is a DRAFT and should not be circulated. Please note that Katherine Turner from David Kendallâ€™s office is copied on here, and she and/or David should be copied on all future communications. Let us know your thoughts. Best. Heather <2015-03-07 Draft statement - updated - REM.MG.JM Edits.docx>