Alphabetized List of Over 100 Professors Questioning 9/11 Commission Report Michael M. Andregg, PhD - Professor, Justice and Peace Studies, St. Thomas University Hugo Bachmann, PhD - Professor Emeritus, Structural Dynamics, Swiss Federal Technology Institute Richard W. Behan, PhD - Dean Emeritus of the School of Forestry, Northern Arizona University Derrill Bodley - Professor of Music, University of the Pacific Robert S. Boyer, PhD - Professor of Computer Science, University of Texas, Austin Francis Boyle, PhD, LLD - Professor of International Law, University of Illinois Clare Brandabur, PhD - Assistant Professor, English Literature, Dogus University Lt. Col. Stephen Butler, EdD - Vice Chancellor, Defense Language Institute Norma Carr-Rufino, PhD - Professor of Management, San Francisco State University Angana Chatterji, PhD - Associate Professor of Anthropology, California Institute of Integral Studies Michel Chossudovsky, PhD - Professor of Economics, University of Ottawa John B. Cobb, Jr., PhD - Professor Emeritus of Theology, Claremont School of Theology Mark Conrad, JD - Assistant Professor of Criminal Justice, Troy University William A. Cook, PhD - Professor of English, University of La Verne John N. Cooper, PhD - Professor of Chemistry, Bucknell University Walter E. Davis, PhD - Associate Professor, College of Education, Kent State University Benjamin Demott, PhD - Professor of Humanities Emeritus, Amherst College A. K. Dewdney, PhD - Professor Emeritus, Computer Science, University of Western Ontario John Albert Dragstedt, PhD - Professor of Classics and Philosophy, St. Mary's College of California Horst Ehmke, PhD - Professor of Law, University of Freiburg C. Peter Erlinder, JD - Professor of Law, William Mitchell College of Law Richard Falk, JSD - Professor Emeritus, International Law and Practice, Princeton University James Fetzer, PhD - Professor Emeritus of Philosophy, University of Minnesota Marcus Ford, PhD - Professor, Humanities Department, Northern Arizona University David Gabbard, EdD - Professor, College of Education, East Carolina University Daniele Ganser, PhD - Professor in the History Department, University of Basel Helen L. Goggin, EdD - Professor Emerita, Religious Education, Knox College, University of Toronto Melvin A. Goodman, PhD - Professor of International Security, National War College James Goulding, PhD - Professor Emeritus of Religion, MacMurray College David Ray Griffin, PhD - Professor Emeritus, Philosophy & Theology, Claremont School of Theology David L. Griscom, PhD - Adjunct Professor, Materials Science and Engineering, University of Arizona Niels Harrit, PhD - Associate Professor of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen Mike Hawryluk, BA, MAT - Professor Emeritus of Physics, Suffolk County Community College, NY Bruce R. Henry, PhD - Professor Emeritus, Mathematics, Worcester State College Carter Heyward, PhD - Professor Emerita of Theology, Episcopal Divinity School Joel S. Hirschhorn, PhD - Professor, Metallurgical Engineering, University of Wisconsin Robert G. Horn, MD - Clinical Professor, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine Richard A. Horsley, PhD - Chair, Dept. of the Study of Religion, University of Massachusetts Joseph C. Hough, PhD - President of the Faculty, Union Theological Seminary, Columbia University Charles H. Hux, MD - Associate Professor, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School Don Trent Jacobs, EdD, PhD - Professor of Educational Leadership, Fielding Graduate University Steven Jones, PhD - Professor of Physics, Brigham Young University Eric Karlstrom, PhD - Professor of Geography, California State University, Stanislaus Faiz Khan, MD - Assistant Professor, Emergency Medicine, Long Island Jewish Hospital Michael Keefer, PhD - Professor, College of Arts, University of Guelph Jack Keller, PhD PE - Professor Emeritus, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State University Sean Kelly, PhD - Professor of Philosophy and Religion, California Institute of Integral Studies Robert M. Korol, PhD - Professor Emeritus, Civil Engineering, McMaster University Georg Kreis, PhD - Professor of History, University of Basel Clark A. Kucheman, PhD - Professor of Christian Ethics, Claremont McKenna College Kenneth L. Kuttler, PhD - Professor of Mathematics, Brigham Young University Eric Larsen, PhD - Professor of English, John Jay College of Criminal Justice (CUNY) Stephen F. LeRoy, PhD - Professor of Economics, University of California, Santa Barbara Jeffery D. Long, PhD - Associate Professor of Religion and Asian Studies, Elizabethtown College Catherine Lowther, PhD - Professor of Psychology, Goddard College David MacGregor, PhD - Professor of Sociology, University of Western Ontario Graeme MacQueen, PhD - Associate Professor of Religious Studies, McMaster University (ret.) John D. Maguire, PhD - President Emeritus of the Claremont University Consortium Lynn Margulis, PhD - Distinguished University Professor, Dept. of Geosciences, Univ. Massachusetts Richard McGinn, PhD - Professor Emeritus, Linguistics and Southeast Asian Studies, Ohio University John McMurtry, PhD - Professor Emeritus of Philosophy, University of Guelph Robert Merrill, PhD - Professor of Literature and Humanities, Maryland Institute College of Art Ralph Metzner, PhD - Professor of Philosophy, California Institute of Integral Studies John Milbank, PhD - Professor in Religion, Politics, and Ethics, University of Nottingham Mark Crispin Miller, PhD - Professor, Culture and Communication, New York University Terry Morrone, PhD - Professor Emeritus of Physics, Adelphi University Raymond Munro, MAH - Professor of Theatre, Clark University Maj. John M. Newman, PhD - Professor of History and International Relations, University of Maryland Jesus Nieto, PhD - Associate Professor, College of Education, San Diego State University Daniel Orr, PhD - Professor Emeritus, Department of Economics, University of Illinois John Pepper, PhD - Assistant Professor, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona James Petras, PhD - Professor Emeritus of Sociology, Binghamton University, SUNY, New York Peter Phillips, PhD - Professor of Sociology, Sonoma State University Rev. David P. Polk, PhD - Assoc. Professor of Pastoral Ministry, Texas Christian University James K. Powell II, PhD - Asst. Professor, Languages and Cultures of Asia, University of Wisconsin Diana Ralph, PhD - Associate Professor, School of Social Work, Carleton University Joanna Rankin, PhD - Professor of Physics and Astronomy, University of Vermont Marcus Raskin, JD - Professor of Policy Studies, George Washington University John Rensenbrink, PhD - Professor Emeritus, Department of Government, Bowdoin College Morgan Reynolds, PhD - Professor Emeritus, Economics, Texas A&M University William Rice, PE - Professor at Vermont Technical College Marilynn M. Rosenthal, PhD - Professor Emerita, Sociology, University of Michigan Rosemary Radford Ruether, PhD - Professor Emerita, Feminist Theology, Grad. Theological Union Bryan Sacks - Adjunct Professor, Department of English and Philosophy, Drexel University Robert Scheer - Professor, Annenberg School for Communication, University of Southern California Jörg Schneider, Dr hc - Professor Emeritus, Structural Dynamics, Swiss Federal Technology Institute Peter Dale Scott, PhD - Professor Emeritus of English, University of California, Berkeley Charles Simpson, PhD - Professor of Sociology, State University of New York, Plattsburgh Rev. Gerald H. Slusser, PhD - Professor Emeritus, Eden Theological Seminary James G. Smart, PhD - Professor Emeritus of History, Keene State College David Sprintzen, PhD - Professor Emeritus of Philosophy, Long Island University Robert J. Stern, MS - Associate Professor, Mathematics, Pellissippi State Technical CC Douglas Sturm, PhD - Professor Emeritus of Religion and Political Science, Bucknell University Marjorie Hewitt Suchocki, PhD - Professor Emerita of Theology, Claremont School of Theology Martin Walter, PhD - Professor and Chairman, Department of Mathematics, University of Colorado Kerry S. Walters, PhD - Professor and Chair, Philosophy Department, Gettysburg College William G. Weaver, JD, PhD - Associate Professor, Political Science, University of Texas, El Paso Burns H. Weston, JSD - Professor Emeritus of Law, University of Iowa William Willers, PhD - Professor Emeritus, Biology and Microbiology, University of Wisconsin William Woodward, PhD - Professor of Psychology, University of New Hampshire Paul Zarembka, PhD - Professor of Economics, State University of New York, Buffalo Howard Zinn, PhD - Professor Emeritus of Political Science, Boston University

Many respected and distinguished university professors have expressed significant criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report. A number even allege government complicity in the terrorist acts of 9/11. Below are the highly revealing public statements on this vital topic of over 100 university professors with links for verification and further investigation.

The collective voices of these respected professors along with over 50 senior government officials, over 250 pilots and aviation professionals, and over 3,000 architects and engineers give credibility to the claim that the 9/11 Commission Report is tragically flawed.These dedicated individuals from across the political spectrum cannot be simply dismissed as irresponsible believers in some 9/11 conspiracy theory. Their sincere concern, backed by impeccable credentials, demonstrates that criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report is not only reasonable, it is in fact a patriotic duty.

OVER 100 PROFESSORS QUESTION 9/11 REPORT

David Ray Griffin, PhD David Ray Griffin, PhD – Professor Emeritus, Philosophy of Religion and Theology, Claremont School of Theology. Author/editor of over two dozen books, Prof. Griffin first questioned the 9/11 official story in 2003 while exploring a 9/11 timeline filled with reliable, verifiable facts suggesting a major cover-up. He then switched his focus from theology to 9/11 research. His seminal book on unresolved inconsistencies in the 9/11 official story, The New Pearl Harbor, has sold over 100,000 copies. His recent Debunking 9/11 Debunking gives in-depth analysis showing that most critics of the 9/11 truth movement are avoiding the deep questions on key, easily verifiable facts. Essay: "The 9/11 Commission Report tells many lies. This point is implied by my critique's subtitle, 'Omissions and Distortions.' How many lies are contained in The 9/11 Commission Report? I do not know. But, deciding to see how many lies I had discussed in my book, I found that I had identified over 100 of them. Once I had made the list, it occurred to me that others might find this summary helpful. Hence this article." [List of 115 lies follows.] See full essay at http://www.serendipity.li/...

"The 9/11 Commission Report tells many lies. This point is implied by my critique's subtitle, 'Omissions and Distortions.' How many lies are contained in The 9/11 Commission Report? I do not know. But, deciding to see how many lies I had discussed in my book, I found that I had identified over 100 of them. Once I had made the list, it occurred to me that others might find this summary helpful. Hence this article." [List of 115 lies follows.] See full essay at http://www.serendipity.li/... Video of Speech 9/14/06: "The official story is false. Why is the official theory an outrageous conspiracy theory? Because every one of the major elements in it can easily be shown to be false."

View video free at http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=62...

"The official story is false. Why is the official theory an outrageous conspiracy theory? Because every one of the major elements in it can easily be shown to be false." View video free at http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=62... Member: Prof. Griffin is an esteemed member of two major organizations of scholars dedicated to researching and revealing the truth of what happened on the fateful day of 9/11, and of the intrepid WantToKnow.info team of dedicated researchers.

Prof. Griffin is an esteemed member of two major organizations of scholars dedicated to researching and revealing the truth of what happened on the fateful day of 9/11, and of the intrepid WantToKnow.info team of dedicated researchers. Bio: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Ray_Griffin

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Ray_Griffin CV: http://www.ctr4process.org/about/CoDirectors/drg_cv.pdf

Joel Hirschhorn, PhD Joel S. Hirschhorn, MS (Metallurgical Engineering), PhD (Materials Engineering) – Professor of Metallurgical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison 1965 - 1978. Senior Staff Member, Congressional Office of Technology Assessment 1978 - 1990. Testified over 50 times before Congress on technology, science, and environmental issues. Author of seven books and over 150 papers, articles, and book chapters on environmental science and technology. Essay, "Painful 9/11 Truth, " 9/4/07: "Many technical analyses cast doubt on the official explanation of the collapse of three World Trade Center buildings, including those presented by an impressive new group: Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. More difficult than discovering the truth, however, is convincing most of the public to accept [it].



When it comes to 9/11, we face the strong belief that only al-Qaeda caused 9/11. But analyses by many experts reveal the collapse of the three WTC buildings was not caused by the two airplanes exploding into the twin towers. The general view is that the buildings were brought down by controlled demolition.



It would have taken considerable effort by a number of people with expertise and access to the buildings to rig them so that they could be intentionally collapsed when the two jets hit. Tough questions flood in: Who could have engineered all this? Could foreign agents accomplish such complex actions - and if they did, why not take credit? If Americans did it, why would they intentionally inflict inevitable mass death and devastation? Worse, they seemingly knew about the plan to fly the jets into the towers. Post-9/11, why have the government and official investigations not come to the same controlled demolition conclusion? This makes sense if the government was involved.

"Many technical analyses cast doubt on the official explanation of the collapse of three World Trade Center buildings, including those presented by an impressive new group: Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. More difficult than discovering the truth, however, is convincing most of the public to accept [it]. When it comes to 9/11, we face the strong belief that only al-Qaeda caused 9/11. But analyses by many experts reveal the collapse of the three WTC buildings was not caused by the two airplanes exploding into the twin towers. The general view is that the buildings were brought down by controlled demolition. It would have taken considerable effort by a number of people with expertise and access to the buildings to rig them so that they could be intentionally collapsed when the two jets hit. Tough questions flood in: Who could have engineered all this? Could foreign agents accomplish such complex actions - and if they did, why not take credit? If Americans did it, why would they intentionally inflict inevitable mass death and devastation? Worse, they seemingly knew about the plan to fly the jets into the towers. Post-9/11, why have the government and official investigations not come to the same controlled demolition conclusion? This makes sense if the government was involved. Blog: http://dailyscare.com/blog/joel_hirschhorn

Robert Korol, PhD Robert M. Korol, PhD – Professor Emeritus, Department of Civil Engineering, McMaster University. Elected Fellow of the Engineering Institute of Canada for exceptional contributions to engineering in Canada. Fellow of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering. Well known for research on steel structures; the plastic theory of metal structures, inelastic buckling, limit analysis, environmental assessment and life cycle analysis methodologies. Hamilton-Wentworth's 1998 "Engineer of the Year." Video of Hamilton, Ontario, 9/11 Truth Symposium 3/23/07 Clip 2 Duration 28:47: (See http://www.911podcasts.com...)



[At 12:40, regarding collapse of WTC Towers 1 & 2] "The whole idea of the pancake theory ... that NIST talks about means that you have no resistance on the way down at that particular floor level that was supposedly weakened significantly. And by significantly I mean all around the perimeter, all at the same time. What an amazing thing that all of the bolts would have failed at the same time. All of the welds would have failed at the same time. And the whole thing comes down very nicely.



There isn't even an explanation for how the core of the structure [collapsed]. It contained the elevators and the stairwells. It is an extremely highly structurally resisting part of the structure. So it is a very strong part of the structure. And it ... was virtually ignored [in the NIST report]. They just talk about the trusses that go across from column to column. And all of them fail at the same time. They start coming down. Even if you were to accept that, you've got resistance as the floors come down.



[At minute 26:05] I think Building number 7 is the big, big question mark and I don't know that there is an engineering explanation for that other than controlled demolition." http://www.911podcasts.com/files/video/hamilton...

(See http://www.911podcasts.com...) [At 12:40, regarding collapse of WTC Towers 1 & 2] "The whole idea of the pancake theory ... that NIST talks about means that you have no resistance on the way down at that particular floor level that was supposedly weakened significantly. And by significantly I mean all around the perimeter, all at the same time. What an amazing thing that all of the bolts would have failed at the same time. All of the welds would have failed at the same time. And the whole thing comes down very nicely. There isn't even an explanation for how the core of the structure [collapsed]. It contained the elevators and the stairwells. It is an extremely highly structurally resisting part of the structure. So it is a very strong part of the structure. And it ... was virtually ignored [in the NIST report]. They just talk about the trusses that go across from column to column. And all of them fail at the same time. They start coming down. Even if you were to accept that, you've got resistance as the floors come down. [At minute 26:05] I think Building number 7 is the big, big question mark and I don't know that there is an engineering explanation for that other than controlled demolition." http://www.911podcasts.com/files/video/hamilton... Bio: http://www.eng.mcmaster.ca/engalumni/macengineer...

Lynn Margulis, PhD Lynn Margulis, PhD – Distinguished University Professor in the Department of Geosciences, University of Massachusetts - Amherst. Elected to the National Academy of Sciences in 1983. Former Chair, National Academy of Science's Space Science Board Committee on Planetary Biology and Chemical Evolution. Recipient of the National Medal of Science, America's highest honor for scientific achievement. Dr. Margulis is best known for contributions to evolution, especially the theory of symbiogenesis. She is the author of over 130 scientific works and numerous books. Personal statement to website, 8/27/07: "The 9/11 tragedy is the most successful and most perverse publicity stunt in the history of public relations. I arrive at this conclusion largely as the result of the research and clear writing by David Ray Griffin in his fabulous books about 9/11. It is clear to me that David Ray Griffin and his fellow critics are correct: the 9/11 'new Pearl Harbor' was planned in astonishing detail and carried out through the efforts of a sophisticated and large network of operatives. It was more complex and far more successful than the Allende assassination, the US bombing of our own ship, the Maine, that began the Spanish-American war, the Reichstag fire that was used to justify the suspension of most civil liberties in Germany in the 1930's, and even Operation Himmler, which was used by Germany to justify the invasion of Poland, which started World War II.



"I suggest that those of us aware and concerned demand that the glaringly erroneous official account of 9/11 be dismissed as a fraud and a new, thorough, and impartial investigation be undertaken."

"The 9/11 tragedy is the most successful and most perverse publicity stunt in the history of public relations. I arrive at this conclusion largely as the result of the research and clear writing by David Ray Griffin in his fabulous books about 9/11. It is clear to me that David Ray Griffin and his fellow critics are correct: the 9/11 'new Pearl Harbor' was planned in astonishing detail and carried out through the efforts of a sophisticated and large network of operatives. It was more complex and far more successful than the Allende assassination, the US bombing of our own ship, the Maine, that began the Spanish-American war, the Reichstag fire that was used to justify the suspension of most civil liberties in Germany in the 1930's, and even Operation Himmler, which was used by Germany to justify the invasion of Poland, which started World War II. "I suggest that those of us aware and concerned demand that the glaringly erroneous official account of 9/11 be dismissed as a fraud and a new, thorough, and impartial investigation be undertaken." Bio: http://www.chelseagreen.com/authors/LynnMargulis

David L. Griscom, PhD David L. Griscom, PhD – Research physicist, retired from Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) in Washington, DC, after 33 years service. Visiting professorships at the Universities of Paris and Saint-Etienne, France, and Tokyo Institute of Technology. Adjunct Professor of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Arizona (2004 - 2005). Fellow of the American Physical Society. Principal author of 109 of his 185 published works. Frequently cited by other researchers. Personal blog 2/9/07: "David Ray Griffin has web-published a splendid, highly footnoted account of The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True. This scholarly work, rich in eyewitness accounts, includes 11 separate pieces of evidence that the World Trade Center towers 1, 2, and 7 were brought down by explosives.



I implore my fellow physicists and engineers who may have time, expertise, and (ideally) supercomputer access to get to work on the physics of the WTC collapses and publish their findings in refereed journals like the Journal of Applied Physics.



The issue of knowing who was really behind the 9/11 attacks is of paramount importance to the future of our country, because the "official" assumption that it was the work of 19 Arab amateurs (1) does not match the available facts and (2) has led directly to the deplorable Patriot Act, the illegal Iraq war, NSA spying on ordinary Americans, [and] repudiation of the Geneva Conventions.



Surely these Orwellian consequences of public ignorance constitute more than sufficient motivation for any patriotic American physicist or engineer to join the search for 9/11 Truth!" http://impactglassman.blogspot.com

"David Ray Griffin has web-published a splendid, highly footnoted account of The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True. This scholarly work, rich in eyewitness accounts, includes 11 separate pieces of evidence that the World Trade Center towers 1, 2, and 7 were brought down by explosives. I implore my fellow physicists and engineers who may have time, expertise, and (ideally) supercomputer access to get to work on the physics of the WTC collapses and publish their findings in refereed journals like the Journal of Applied Physics. The issue of knowing who was really behind the 9/11 attacks is of paramount importance to the future of our country, because the "official" assumption that it was the work of 19 Arab amateurs (1) does not match the available facts and (2) has led directly to the deplorable Patriot Act, the illegal Iraq war, NSA spying on ordinary Americans, [and] repudiation of the Geneva Conventions. Surely these Orwellian consequences of public ignorance constitute more than sufficient motivation for any patriotic American physicist or engineer to join the search for 9/11 Truth!" http://impactglassman.blogspot.com Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice

Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice Bio: http://www.impactglassresearchinternational.com/index.html

Steven Jones, PhD Steven Jones, PhD – Former Professor of Physics at Brigham Young University. Retired Oct. 2006 to devote more time to 9/11 research. Principal Investigator for experimental Muon-catalyzed fusion for the U.S. Department of Energy. Author of over 40 papers published in peer-reviewed scientific journals. Founder of Journal of 9/11 Studies for scholarly papers questioning the 9/11 official story. Peer reviewed paper, Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Completely Collapse? in Journal of 9/11 Studies, 9/06: "On the basis of photographic and video evidence as well as related data and analyses, I provide thirteen reasons for rejecting the official hypothesis, according to which fire and impact damage caused the collapse of the Twin Towers and WTC 7, in favor of the controlled-demolition hypothesis. The goal of this paper is to promote further scrutiny of the official government-sponsored reports as well as serious investigation of the controlled demolition hypothesis." http://www.journalof911studies.com...

"On the basis of photographic and video evidence as well as related data and analyses, I provide thirteen reasons for rejecting the official hypothesis, according to which fire and impact damage caused the collapse of the Twin Towers and WTC 7, in favor of the controlled-demolition hypothesis. The goal of this paper is to promote further scrutiny of the official government-sponsored reports as well as serious investigation of the controlled demolition hypothesis." http://www.journalof911studies.com... [ Editor's note: WTC Building 7 was 47 stories tall and was not hit by an airplane. However, no mention of the reason for its collapse appears in the 9/11 Commission's "full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks." Watch the collapse video here.]

WTC Building 7 was 47 stories tall and was not hit by an airplane. However, no mention of the reason for its collapse appears in the 9/11 Commission's "full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks." Watch the collapse video here.] Founding Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice. Association Statement: "Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice is a non-partisan organization consisting of independent researchers and activists engaged in uncovering the true nature of the September 11, 2001 attacks."

Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice. Association Statement: "Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice is a non-partisan organization consisting of independent researchers and activists engaged in uncovering the true nature of the September 11, 2001 attacks." Major media coverage: www.WantToKnow.info/steven...

www.WantToKnow.info/steven... Bio: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_E._Jones

John N. Cooper, PhD John N. Cooper, PhD – Professor of Chemistry, Bucknell University 1967 - 2003. Author of 35 published papers in the fields of chemical education and inorganic kinetics and structure. Review of Prof. David Ray Griffin's The New Pearl Harbor 3/29/04: "Griffin's approach is utterly admirable: coherently, systematically and objectively, he scrupulously and minutely documents the flaws, contradictions, inconsistencies and discrepancies in the 'official version' of the events of that day. Ultimately he assembles and tabulates a list of thirty-eight apparent irregularities in the timeline of, and evidence remaining from, these attacks and asks how they might plausibly be reconciled: Why were the 'standard operating procedures' for the emergency scrambling of fighter jets in the event of a commercial airplane's highjacking not implemented until after the crash at the Pentagon? Why was there no evidence of a passenger jet debris at the Pentagon crash site? What happened on UA flight 93?



Griffin refuses to throw out possibilities simply because they are outrageous, outlandish or shocking; he lets the evidence speak for itself. The results are deeply disturbing. With admirable academic objectivity, Griffin refuses to indict or endorse any specific hypothesis. Rather he presents a substantial body of very disturbing evidence. [He then] calls for a real, open, hardnosed investigation that does not begin with the proposition that only those scenarios in which the assumption that our government or its members play only a benign and benevolent role - seeking only the welfare and best interests of its citizenry - will be considered.



The New Pearl Harbor - Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11 is a book that ought to be thoughtfully read and considered by every thinking, voting member of the electorate." http://www.axisoflogic.com/cgi-bin/exec/view...

"Griffin's approach is utterly admirable: coherently, systematically and objectively, he scrupulously and minutely documents the flaws, contradictions, inconsistencies and discrepancies in the 'official version' of the events of that day. Ultimately he assembles and tabulates a list of thirty-eight apparent irregularities in the timeline of, and evidence remaining from, these attacks and asks how they might plausibly be reconciled: Why were the 'standard operating procedures' for the emergency scrambling of fighter jets in the event of a commercial airplane's highjacking not implemented until after the crash at the Pentagon? Why was there no evidence of a passenger jet debris at the Pentagon crash site? What happened on UA flight 93? Griffin refuses to throw out possibilities simply because they are outrageous, outlandish or shocking; he lets the evidence speak for itself. The results are deeply disturbing. With admirable academic objectivity, Griffin refuses to indict or endorse any specific hypothesis. Rather he presents a substantial body of very disturbing evidence. [He then] calls for a real, open, hardnosed investigation that does not begin with the proposition that only those scenarios in which the assumption that our government or its members play only a benign and benevolent role - seeking only the welfare and best interests of its citizenry - will be considered. The New Pearl Harbor - Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11 is a book that ought to be thoughtfully read and considered by every thinking, voting member of the electorate." http://www.axisoflogic.com/cgi-bin/exec/view... Bio: http://www.facstaff.bucknell.edu/jcooper/

Niels Harrit, PhD Niels Harrit, PhD – Associate Professor of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen. Member, International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry. Member, European Photochemistry Association. Author of numerous scientific papers with a special focus on nano-science. Essay 3/31/07: "Two official explanations of the events in Manhattan on 11 September have been put forward by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST).



In the final FEMA report, WTC7 is hardly mentioned. They note that there were fires in the building, but do not attempt to explain the collapse. The final NIST report was released in September 2005, but the section covering WTC7 was left out, with the promise that a final version would be released later. Publication has been delayed several times, and we are still waiting for it.



The attack on the World Trade Center was a tragedy for the people in the towers and in the airplanes, and a tragedy for their families. It also marked the beginning of the tragic war on terror. The current trends in Western society towards greater surveillance and the loss of civil rights can also only be called tragic. If we have also been lied to, the tragedy is complete.



How did WTC7 collapse? We are not asking 'why'. Some extremely simple observations have been made, and we want to hear an official explanation that is consistent with elementary physics and chemistry." http://www.911truth.dk/first/en/art_Harrit.htm

"Two official explanations of the events in Manhattan on 11 September have been put forward by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST). In the final FEMA report, WTC7 is hardly mentioned. They note that there were fires in the building, but do not attempt to explain the collapse. The final NIST report was released in September 2005, but the section covering WTC7 was left out, with the promise that a final version would be released later. Publication has been delayed several times, and we are still waiting for it. The attack on the World Trade Center was a tragedy for the people in the towers and in the airplanes, and a tragedy for their families. It also marked the beginning of the tragic war on terror. The current trends in Western society towards greater surveillance and the loss of civil rights can also only be called tragic. If we have also been lied to, the tragedy is complete. How did WTC7 collapse? We are not asking 'why'. Some extremely simple observations have been made, and we want to hear an official explanation that is consistent with elementary physics and chemistry." http://www.911truth.dk/first/en/art_Harrit.htm Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice

Peter Phillips, PhD Peter Phillips, PhD – Professor of Sociology, Sonoma State University. Director, Project Censored. Author of several books and chief editor of the highly regarded annual Project Censored books which uncover vital news neglected by the major media. Prof. Phillips is also a respected member of the intrepid WantToKnow.info team. Essay 3/6/05: "A threshold concept facing Americans is the possibility that the 9/11 Commission Report was on many levels a cover-up for the failure of the US government to prevent the tragedy. The report failed to address sources of external assistance to the terrorists. Investigations into this area might have lead to a conclusion that elements of various governments - including our own - not only knew about the attacks in advance, but also may have helped facilitate their implementation.



"Overall concerns with the official version of 9/11 have been published and discussed by scholars and politicians around the world. The response to most has been to label these discussions as "conspiracy theories" unworthy of media coverage or further review. Pursuit of a critical analysis of these questions is undermined by the psychological barrier about 9/11 issues as threshold concepts — too awful to even consider.



"We must step past the threshold and have the courage to ask the questions, demand answers, and support research into all aspects of this American tragedy. Perhaps the closet isn't as dark and as fearful as we envision. If we don't courageously look and search into the deepest regions of our fears, how can we assure our children and ourselves a safe and honest future?" http://www.commondreams.org/views...

"A threshold concept facing Americans is the possibility that the 9/11 Commission Report was on many levels a cover-up for the failure of the US government to prevent the tragedy. The report failed to address sources of external assistance to the terrorists. Investigations into this area might have lead to a conclusion that elements of various governments - including our own - not only knew about the attacks in advance, but also may have helped facilitate their implementation. "Overall concerns with the official version of 9/11 have been published and discussed by scholars and politicians around the world. The response to most has been to label these discussions as "conspiracy theories" unworthy of media coverage or further review. Pursuit of a critical analysis of these questions is undermined by the psychological barrier about 9/11 issues as threshold concepts — too awful to even consider. "We must step past the threshold and have the courage to ask the questions, demand answers, and support research into all aspects of this American tragedy. Perhaps the closet isn't as dark and as fearful as we envision. If we don't courageously look and search into the deepest regions of our fears, how can we assure our children and ourselves a safe and honest future?" http://www.commondreams.org/views... Bio: http://www.sonoma.edu/sociology/biopeter.htm

Jörg Schneider, Dr hc Jörg Schneider, Dr hc – Professor Emeritus, Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology. Former Vice President and honorary lifetime member of the International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering. Tages Anzeiger Article 9/9/06: "In my opinion ... building WTC 7 was, with great probability, professionally demolished," says Hugo Bachmann, Emeritus ETH-Professor of Structural Analysis and Construction. And also Jörg Schneider, likewise emeritus ETH-Professor of Structural Analysis and Construction, interprets the few available video recordings as evidence that "the building WTC 7 was with great probability demolished."

English translation: http://www.danieleganser.ch/zeitungsartikel...

Original in German: http://www.danieleganser.ch/zeitungsart...

"In my opinion ... building WTC 7 was, with great probability, professionally demolished," says Hugo Bachmann, Emeritus ETH-Professor of Structural Analysis and Construction. And also Jörg Schneider, likewise emeritus ETH-Professor of Structural Analysis and Construction, interprets the few available video recordings as evidence that "the building WTC 7 was with great probability demolished." English translation: http://www.danieleganser.ch/zeitungsartikel... Original in German: http://www.danieleganser.ch/zeitungsart... [ Editor's note: WTC Building 7 was 610 feet tall, 47 stories, and was not hit by an airplane. However, no mention of its collapse appears in the 9/11 Commission's "full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks." Watch the collapse video here.]

WTC Building 7 was 610 feet tall, 47 stories, and was not hit by an airplane. However, no mention of its collapse appears in the 9/11 Commission's "full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks." Watch the collapse video here.] Bio: http://www.iabse.ethz.ch

Daniele Ganser, PhD Daniele Ganser, PhD – Professor in the History Department at the University of Basel. Former Senior Researcher at the Center for Security Studies at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology. Former Researcher at the Military Academy (MILAK) of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology. Author of NATO's Secret Armies, on the history of U.S.-sponsored false flag operations in Europe after WW II. Interview 4/8/05: "Academics who study secret warfare find themselves between these three theories—LIHOP [The US government knew the attack was coming, but Let It Happen On Purpose], SURPRISE [The US government was not expecting the attack], and INSIDE JOB [The U.S. government planned and executed the attack]. They all are "conspiracy theories," by the way. Researchers try to find out which theory is best able to account for all the known facts.



"But unfortunately, the 600-page [9/11 Commission] report, published in July 2004 and accepted by Bush as the "official story" of what happened in respect to 9/11, does not even mention the LIHOP and INSIDE JOB theories! It presents SURPRISE as the only possible explanation.



"Now, [9/11 Commission Executive Director] Philip Zelikow is a respected professor of history. As a fellow historian I was therefore very surprised to find that his report is totally unbalanced. Of course, Zelikow is aware of the LIHOP and INSIDE JOB theories, no doubt. How can he author a book on 9/11, which claims to search for the truth, but which totally ignores these theories?" http://www.danieleganser.ch/e...

"Academics who study secret warfare find themselves between these three theories—LIHOP [The US government knew the attack was coming, but Let It Happen On Purpose], SURPRISE [The US government was not expecting the attack], and INSIDE JOB [The U.S. government planned and executed the attack]. They all are "conspiracy theories," by the way. Researchers try to find out which theory is best able to account for all the known facts. "But unfortunately, the 600-page [9/11 Commission] report, published in July 2004 and accepted by Bush as the "official story" of what happened in respect to 9/11, does not even mention the LIHOP and INSIDE JOB theories! It presents SURPRISE as the only possible explanation. "Now, [9/11 Commission Executive Director] Philip Zelikow is a respected professor of history. As a fellow historian I was therefore very surprised to find that his report is totally unbalanced. Of course, Zelikow is aware of the LIHOP and INSIDE JOB theories, no doubt. How can he author a book on 9/11, which claims to search for the truth, but which totally ignores these theories?" http://www.danieleganser.ch/e... Bio: http://www.danieleganser.ch/e/biographie/index.htm

John McMurtry, PhD John McMurtry, PhD – Professor of Philosophy, University of Guelph. Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada. Author of several books dealing with public policy issues, including: Value Wars: The Global Market Versus the Life Economy, and Unequal Freedoms: The Global Market As an Ethical System. Contributor to 9/11 and American Empire (Vol I): Intellectuals Speak Out: "The documented details that expose 9/11 denial will not be repeated here, because this volume and others have already reported them. They are impressively massive in confirming ... the long open pathway to the attacks and the blocking of all independent inquiry since then." www.snowshoefilms.com/mcm...

"The documented details that expose 9/11 denial will not be repeated here, because this volume and others have already reported them. They are impressively massive in confirming ... the long open pathway to the attacks and the blocking of all independent inquiry since then." www.snowshoefilms.com/mcm... Signatory: Petition For An Independent International 9/11 Truth Commission. "The Bush administration has never offered a detailed and documented account of its claims about the events of 9-11 which have allegedly revolutionized human affairs. Nor has it explained obvious and serious discrepancies in its own statements and actions. The Kean-Hamilton panel's limited funding from Congress makes a mockery of the tragedy of 9-11, considering that it is only a small fraction of the huge sums spent to investigate Bill Clinton [for his sexual indiscretions].



"We therefore call upon statesmen, thinkers, journalists, investigators, artists, scientists, and other eminent personalities from around the world to form an Independent International Truth Commission dedicated to preventing unproven assertions about 9-11 from setting the stage for a new world conflagration." http://iitc.911review.org

Petition For An Independent International 9/11 Truth Commission. "The Bush administration has never offered a detailed and documented account of its claims about the events of 9-11 which have allegedly revolutionized human affairs. Nor has it explained obvious and serious discrepancies in its own statements and actions. The Kean-Hamilton panel's limited funding from Congress makes a mockery of the tragedy of 9-11, considering that it is only a small fraction of the huge sums spent to investigate Bill Clinton [for his sexual indiscretions]. "We therefore call upon statesmen, thinkers, journalists, investigators, artists, scientists, and other eminent personalities from around the world to form an Independent International Truth Commission dedicated to preventing unproven assertions about 9-11 from setting the stage for a new world conflagration." http://iitc.911review.org Bio: http://www.uoguelph.ca/philosophy/faculty

Terry Morrone, PhD

No photo available Terry Morrone, PhD – Professor Emeritus of Physics, Adelphi University. Author of several scientific papers on the physics of plasma. Researcher and innovator in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and holder of 17 patents in the field. Essay in April 2007 Edition of Journal of 9/11 Studies Titled Proof That The Thermal and Gravitational Energy Available Were Insufficient To Melt Steel In The Twin Towers And 7 World Trade Center On 9/11

"In this communication I shall show that only explosives could have produced the large amounts of molten steel found at the site of the World Trade Center (WTC) in the days following 9/11. There is universal agreement by scientists in and out of government that the temperatures reached in the fires were much lower than the melting point of steel. Steel could have only have melted (assuming no explosives were used) if it gained additional energy in falling. I shall show that this gravitational energy is insufficient to cause melting.



Conclusions: Since there was molten steel in the wreckage of the World Trade Center, and since the temperatures of the fires were insufficient to melt steel, and since the gravitational energy was shown to be very much smaller than the energy needed to melt steel, the Twin Towers and 7 WTC could only have been brought down by explosives or cutter charges." http://journalof911studies.com/volume/200704/ProfMorrone...

"In this communication I shall show that only explosives could have produced the large amounts of molten steel found at the site of the World Trade Center (WTC) in the days following 9/11. There is universal agreement by scientists in and out of government that the temperatures reached in the fires were much lower than the melting point of steel. Steel could have only have melted (assuming no explosives were used) if it gained additional energy in falling. I shall show that this gravitational energy is insufficient to cause melting. Conclusions: Since there was molten steel in the wreckage of the World Trade Center, and since the temperatures of the fires were insufficient to melt steel, and since the gravitational energy was shown to be very much smaller than the energy needed to melt steel, the Twin Towers and 7 WTC could only have been brought down by explosives or cutter charges." http://journalof911studies.com/volume/200704/ProfMorrone... Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice. Association Statement: "Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice is a non-partisan organization consisting of independent researchers and activists engaged in uncovering the true nature of the 9/11 attacks."

Mike Hawryluk, MAT

No photo available Mike Hawryluk, MAT – Professor Emeritus of Physics and former Division Chairman, Suffolk County Community College, NY. Statement to this website 3/30/07: "



I blurted out, "My god, they wired the building."



I haven't been at peace with myself, or the world, since then. I had no idea who the "they" in my utterance was, and to this day still do not. Since learning more about the events leading up, and subsequent to the tragedy, I have become firmly convinced that the conspiracy being sold to the world by the Government, the media, and debunkers is the greatest Red Herring of our time, if not in history. Those of us who are seeking the "Truth about 9/11" face a formidable but not insurmountable challenge: to convince those who don't want to know to join us in applying a continuing and increasing pressure on the media to force those who don't want us to know into the light of day."

My wife and I, transfixed in front of a TV as the horror of 9/11 unfolded, watched as the topmost, undamaged floors of the WTC South Tower started to gradually lean (rotate) in the direction of the damage due to impact. In an instant, the rotation stopped, and that which was rotating began to fall, as if only under the influence of gravity! The fulcrum was no longer there!I blurted out, "My god, they wired the building."I haven't been at peace with myself, or the world, since then. I had no idea who the "they" in my utterance was, and to this day still do not. Since learning more about the events leading up, and subsequent to the tragedy, I have become firmly convinced that the conspiracy being sold to the world by the Government, the media, and debunkers is the greatest Red Herring of our time, if not in history. Those of us who are seeking the "Truth about 9/11" face a formidable but not insurmountable challenge: to convince those who don't want to know to join us in applying a continuing and increasing pressure on the media to force those who don't want us to know into the light of day." Link to full statement

" Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice. Association Statement: "Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice is a non-partisan organization consisting of independent researchers and activists engaged in uncovering the true nature of the 9/11 attacks."

Michel Chossudovsky, PhD Michel Chossudovsky, PhD – Professor of Economics, University of Ottawa. Consultant to several international organizations including the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), the African Development Bank, the United Nations African Institute for Economic Development and Planning (AIEDEP), the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), the International Labour Organization (ILO), the World Health Organisation (WHO), the United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). Prof. Chossudovsky is the author of several important books, including his popular War and Globalisation: The Truth Behind September 11. Article 7/20/06: "What I've done in my writings is to show that the official narrative or explanation regarding 9/11 can be refuted, namely that the official narrative is a lie.



"What the 9/11 Commission Report has submitted is an extensive narrative of what happened on that day and what happened on the planes. And the evidence suggests that the 9/11 report is a lie. It's fabricated." http://www.globalresearch...

"What I've done in my writings is to show that the official narrative or explanation regarding 9/11 can be refuted, namely that the official narrative is a lie. "What the 9/11 Commission Report has submitted is an extensive narrative of what happened on that day and what happened on the planes. And the evidence suggests that the 9/11 report is a lie. It's fabricated." http://www.globalresearch... Over 100 Articles and Papers : http://www.globalresearch.ca...

http://www.globalresearch.ca... Bio: http://www.transnational.org/SAJT/tff/people/m_choss...

Bruce R. Henry, PhD

Bruce R. Henry, PhD – Professor Emeritus, Mathematics and Computer Science, Worcester State College. Former guidance systems engineer for Polaris and Trident missiles, General Electric. Statement to this website 6/11/07: "It is clear extraordinarily powerful explosives were used to destroy the WTC Twin Towers. Careful scrutiny of video of the collapse of the South Tower (WTC2) shows the upper segment (above the airplane strike) listing, then dropping, then disintegrating or pulverizing. There was a massive explosion near ground level immediately before those events. The tilt-then-drop sequence shows the building's central structural steel core ... had by some agency been made insubstantial and unable to bear weight. Putting that together with the ground level blast and the subsequent pulverization it is clear very powerful explosives had to have been in play. The airplane strike was a mere smokescreen.



Who planted the explosives? What kind of explosives were used? When were they planted? And for what reasons would someone destroy ... the Twin Towers? Simple logic requires of a credible account of the 9/11 events that it explain ALL details clearly shown in documentary footage, together with all other known facts. The Official Story does not even come close to meeting that standard."

"It is clear extraordinarily powerful explosives were used to destroy the WTC Twin Towers. Careful scrutiny of video of the collapse of the South Tower (WTC2) shows the upper segment (above the airplane strike) listing, then dropping, then disintegrating or pulverizing. There was a massive explosion near ground level immediately before those events. The tilt-then-drop sequence shows the building's central structural steel core ... had by some agency been made insubstantial and unable to bear weight. Putting that together with the ground level blast and the subsequent pulverization it is clear very powerful explosives had to have been in play. The airplane strike was a mere smokescreen. Who planted the explosives? What kind of explosives were used? When were they planted? And for what reasons would someone destroy ... the Twin Towers? Simple logic requires of a credible account of the 9/11 events that it explain ALL details clearly shown in documentary footage, together with all other known facts. The Official Story does not even come close to meeting that standard." Article 8/12/06: "The sudden collapse, the seamless downward cascade of the crumbling WTC towers planted doubt in Bruce Henry's mind. The way the buildings fell didn't seem right. The implosion-like plummeting, the absence of central beams and girders refusing to fall, the speed of the collapse -- all raised suspicion for the retired mathematics professor from Worcester. "To me it seems so transparent with a minimal amount of reflection that there's something catawampus," or cockeyed, with the terrorist attacks of 9/11. Finally, he came to a shocking conclusion that runs counter to the accepted history of America's darkest day: The towers, he believes, "were brought down by planted explosives." http://www.informationliberation.com

"The sudden collapse, the seamless downward cascade of the crumbling WTC towers planted doubt in Bruce Henry's mind. The way the buildings fell didn't seem right. The implosion-like plummeting, the absence of central beams and girders refusing to fall, the speed of the collapse -- all raised suspicion for the retired mathematics professor from Worcester. "To me it seems so transparent with a minimal amount of reflection that there's something catawampus," or cockeyed, with the terrorist attacks of 9/11. Finally, he came to a shocking conclusion that runs counter to the accepted history of America's darkest day: The towers, he believes, "were brought down by planted explosives." http://www.informationliberation.com Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth

Martin Walter, PhD

No photo available Martin Walter, PhD – Professor and Chairman of the Department of Mathematics, University of Colorado at Boulder. Member, Executive Committee of the Rocky Mountain chapter of the Sierra Club. Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth Association Statement: "Research proves the current administration has been dishonest about what happened in New York and Washington, D.C. The World Trade Center was almost certainly brought down by controlled demolitions and that the available relevant evidence casts grave doubt on the government's official story about the attack on the Pentagon."

Scholars for 9/11 Truth Association Statement: "Research proves the current administration has been dishonest about what happened in New York and Washington, D.C. The World Trade Center was almost certainly brought down by controlled demolitions and that the available relevant evidence casts grave doubt on the government's official story about the attack on the Pentagon." Bio: http://www.colorado.edu/math/earthmath/marty.html

William Rice, PE

No photo available

William Rice, PE – Former Professor of Engineering at Vermont Technical College where he taught engineering materials, structures lab, and other building related courses. Registered Professional Civil Engineer who worked on structural steel and concrete buildings in Boston, New York, and Philadelphia. Essay Vermont Guardian 3/1/07: "Having worked on structural steel buildings as a civil engineer in the era when the Twin Towers were designed and constructed, I found some disturbing discrepancies and omissions concerning their collapse on 9/11. The interesting fact is that each of these 110-story Twin Towers fell upon itself in about ten seconds at nearly free-fall speed. This violates Newton's Law of Conservation of Momentum that would require that as the stationary inertia of each floor is overcome by being hit, the mass (weight) increases and the free-fall speed decreases.



Even if Newton's Law is ignored, the prevailing theory would have us believe that each of the Twin Towers inexplicably collapsed upon itself crushing all 287 massive columns on each floor while maintaining a free-fall speed as if the 100,000, or more, tons of supporting structural-steel framework underneath didn't exist.



Controlled demolition is so politically unthinkable that the media not only demeans the messenger but also ridicules and "debunks" the message rather than provide investigative reporting. Curiously, it took 441 days for the president's 9/11 Commission to start an "investigation" into a tragedy where more than 2,500 WTC lives were taken. The Commission's investigation also didn't include the possibility of controlled-demolition, nor did it include an investigation into the "unusual and unprecedented" manner in which WTC Building #7 collapsed. http://www.vermontguardian.com/commentary/03...

Robert S. Boyer, PhD Robert S. Boyer, PhD – Professor of Computer Science, University of Texas, Austin. Fellow of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence. Awarded the 2005 Software System Award by the Association for Computing Machinery. Awarded the 6th Herbrand Award (1999) for exceptional contributions to the field of Automated Deduction, by the Conferences on Automated Deduction. Co-author of A Computational Logic Handbook. Editor of Automated Reasoning. Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice. Association Statement: "Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice is a non-partisan organization consisting of independent researchers and activists engaged in uncovering the true nature of the 9/11 attacks."

Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice. Association Statement: "Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice is a non-partisan organization consisting of independent researchers and activists engaged in uncovering the true nature of the 9/11 attacks." Bio: http://www.cs.utexas.edu/~boyer/

Joanna Rankin, PhD Joanna Rankin, PhD – Professor of Physics and Astronomy, University of Vermont. Member: Vermonters for a Real 9/11 Investigation. Association Statement: "We do support a new, thorough, and truly independent forensic investigation of the events on and surrounding 9/11. We believe that without such an investigation, the threat of further attacks like those of 9/11 remains unabated, our government will continue to erode our civil liberties, and our government will continue to support foreign policies that are destructive to the U.S. and to the world."

Vermonters for a Real 9/11 Investigation. Association Statement: "We do support a new, thorough, and truly independent forensic investigation of the events on and surrounding 9/11. We believe that without such an investigation, the threat of further attacks like those of 9/11 remains unabated, our government will continue to erode our civil liberties, and our government will continue to support foreign policies that are destructive to the U.S. and to the world." Bio: http://www.uvm.edu/~jmrankin/?Page=default.html

Kenneth L. Kuttler, PhD Kenneth L. Kuttler, PhD – Professor of Mathematics, Brigham Young University. Essay: "I provide a short computation, focused on World Trade Center building 7. Based on very favorable assumptions for achieving a fast fall, including ignoring resistance due to intact steel columns, I could only get the building to fall in about 8.3 seconds, whereas the observed roof-fall time is approximately 6.5 seconds. The problem is the large number of floors and conservation of momentum in a collision. Some of the "official" explanations about progressive collapse are evocative but they do not explain the difficulty in the rapid fall of the building along with what is evidently taking place when the video of the falling building is observed." http://www.journalof911studies.com

"I provide a short computation, focused on World Trade Center building 7. Based on very favorable assumptions for achieving a fast fall, including ignoring resistance due to intact steel columns, I could only get the building to fall in about 8.3 seconds, whereas the observed roof-fall time is approximately 6.5 seconds. The problem is the large number of floors and conservation of momentum in a collision. Some of the "official" explanations about progressive collapse are evocative but they do not explain the difficulty in the rapid fall of the building along with what is evidently taking place when the video of the falling building is observed." http://www.journalof911studies.com [ Editor's note: WTC Building 7 was 610 feet tall, 47 stories, and was not hit by an airplane. It would have been the tallest building in 33 states. However, no mention of its collapse appears in the 9/11 Commission's "full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks." Watch the collapse video here. And 5 1/2 years after 9/11, the Federal government has yet to publish its promised final report that explains the cause of its collapse.]

WTC Building 7 was 610 feet tall, 47 stories, and was not hit by an airplane. It would have been the tallest building in 33 states. However, no mention of its collapse appears in the 9/11 Commission's "full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks." Watch the collapse video here. And 5 1/2 years after 9/11, the Federal government has yet to publish its promised final report that explains the cause of its collapse.] Bio: https://math.byu.edu/~klkuttle/

https://math.byu.edu/~klkuttle/ CV: http://www.math.byu.edu/%7Eklkuttle/vitaforweb.pdf



Robert J. Stern, MS

Robert J. Stern, MS – Associate Professor, Mathematics, Pellissippi State Technical Community College. Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice. Association Statement: "Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice is a non-partisan organization consisting of independent researchers and activists engaged in uncovering the true nature of the 9/11 attacks."

Jack Keller, PhD, PE Jack Keller, PhD, PE – Professor Emeritus, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State University. Selected by Scientific American magazine as one of the world's 50 leading contributors to science and technology benefiting society (2004). Member, National Academy of Engineering. International advisor on water resources, development and agricultural water use. Awarded State of Utah Governor's Medal for Science and Technology (1988). Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth. Association Statement: "Research proves the current administration has been dishonest about what happened in New York and Washington, D.C. The World Trade Center was almost certainly brought down by controlled demolitions and that the available relevant evidence casts grave doubt on the government's official story about the attack on the Pentagon."

Burns H. Weston, JSD Burns H. Weston, JSD – Bessie Dutton Murray Distinguished Professor of Law Emeritus and Director, Center for Human Rights, University of Iowa. Fellow, World Academy of Art and Science. Honorary Editor, Board of Editors, American Journal of International Law (Washington, DC). Senior Human Rights Adviser, IKEA Social Initiative. Senior Human Rights Adviser, UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, Florence, Italy. Endorsement of The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions: "In this masterful sequel to The New Pearl Harbor, David Ray Griffin unveils a disparity between official 9/11 "spin" and independently researched 9/11 fact so glaring as to suggest the possibility of a constitutional crisis unlike anything our country has ever known. In this new study, as in its predecessor, he simply details the hard, cold evidence that seriously--and alarmingly--challenges the independence, impartiality, and thoroughness of the 9/11 Commission. For anyone serious about combating terrorism, let alone upholding constitutional democracy, The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions, is a must read."

"In this masterful sequel to The New Pearl Harbor, David Ray Griffin unveils a disparity between official 9/11 "spin" and independently researched 9/11 fact so glaring as to suggest the possibility of a constitutional crisis unlike anything our country has ever known. In this new study, as in its predecessor, he simply details the hard, cold evidence that seriously--and alarmingly--challenges the independence, impartiality, and thoroughness of the 9/11 Commission. For anyone serious about combating terrorism, let alone upholding constitutional democracy, The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions, is a must read." Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11:

"We want truthful answers to questions. … As Americans of conscience, we ask for four things:

Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11: "We want truthful answers to questions. … As Americans of conscience, we ask for four things: Immediate investigation by NY Att. General Eliot Spitzer



Immediate investigation in Congressional hearings.



Media attention to scrutinize and investigate the evidence.



The formation of a truly independent citizens-based inquiry." http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041026...



Bio: http://www.burnsweston.com/biodata/vitae.shtml

Francis Boyle, PhD, LLD Francis Boyle, PhD, LLD – Professor of International Law at the University of Illinois, Champaign. A leading practitioner and advocate of international law. He was responsible for drafting the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, the American implementing legislation for the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention. He served on the Board of Directors of Amnesty International (1988-1992), and represented Bosnia- Herzegovina at the World Court. He holds a Doctor of Law Magna Cum Laude as well as a Ph.D. in Political Science, both from Harvard University. Article 12/13/06: "The real culprits behind the 2001 anthrax attack on Congress were most likely US government scientists at the army's Ft. Detrick, MD., bioterrorism lab according to a former government biological weapons legislator and University of Illinois Professor.



Dr. Francis A. Boyle says the FBI covered up these facts and has also quite clearly stated that he doubts the official government story that 19 arabs with boxcutters perpetrated the attacks of 9/11.



"I believe the FBI knows exactly who was behind these terrorist anthrax attacks upon the United States Congress in the Fall of 2001, and that the culprits were US government-related scientists involved in a criminal US government bio-warfare program," Boyle says in his new book Biowarfare and Terrorism.



Boyle goes on to inquire, "Could the real culprits behind the terrorist attacks on 11 September 2001, and the immediately following terrorist anthrax attacks upon Congress ultimately prove to be the same people? Could it truly be coincidental that two of the primary intended victims of the terrorist anthrax attacks - Senators Daschle and Leahy - were holding up the speedy passage of the pre-planned USA Patriot Act ... an act which provided the federal government with unprecedented powers in relation to US citizens and institutions?" http://infowars.net

"The real culprits behind the 2001 anthrax attack on Congress were most likely US government scientists at the army's Ft. Detrick, MD., bioterrorism lab according to a former government biological weapons legislator and University of Illinois Professor. Dr. Francis A. Boyle says the FBI covered up these facts and has also quite clearly stated that he doubts the official government story that 19 arabs with boxcutters perpetrated the attacks of 9/11. "I believe the FBI knows exactly who was behind these terrorist anthrax attacks upon the United States Congress in the Fall of 2001, and that the culprits were US government-related scientists involved in a criminal US government bio-warfare program," Boyle says in his new book Biowarfare and Terrorism. Boyle goes on to inquire, "Could the real culprits behind the terrorist attacks on 11 September 2001, and the immediately following terrorist anthrax attacks upon Congress ultimately prove to be the same people? Could it truly be coincidental that two of the primary intended victims of the terrorist anthrax attacks - Senators Daschle and Leahy - were holding up the speedy passage of the pre-planned USA Patriot Act ... an act which provided the federal government with unprecedented powers in relation to US citizens and institutions?" http://infowars.net Bio: http://www.law.uiuc.edu/faculty

C. Peter Erlinder, JD C. Peter Erlinder, JD – Professor of Law, William Mitchell College of Law. Past President, National Lawyers Guild. Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11:

"We want truthful answers to questions. … As Americans of conscience, we ask for four things:

Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11: "We want truthful answers to questions. … As Americans of conscience, we ask for four things: Immediate investigation by NY Att. General Eliot Spitzer



Immediate investigation in Congressional hearings.



Media attention to scrutinize and investigate the evidence.



The formation of a truly independent citizens-based inquiry." http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041026...



Bio: http://www.wmitchell.edu/academics/faculty

Mark Conrad, JD Mark Conrad, JD – Assistant Professor of Criminal Justice at Troy University. Associate General Counsel, National Association of Federal Agents. Retired Agent in Charge, Internal Affairs, U.S. Customs, responsible for the internal integrity and security for areas encompassing nine states and two foreign locations. Former Federal Sky Marshall. 27-year U.S. Customs career. Signatory of a Letter to Congress regarding the 9/11 Commission Report 9/13/04, signed by 25 military, intelligence, and law enforcement veterans:



"[W]e the undersigned wish to bring to the attention of the Congress and the people of the United States what we believe are serious shortcomings in the report and its recommendations. …



Omission is one of the major flaws in the Commission's report. We are aware of significant issues and cases that were duly reported to the commission by those of us with direct knowledge, but somehow escaped attention. …



The omission of such serious and applicable issues and information by itself renders the report flawed, and casts doubt on the validity of many of its recommendations. ...



The Commission, with its incomplete report of "facts and circumstances", intentional avoidance of assigning accountability, and disregard for the knowledge, expertise and experience of those who actually do the job, has now set about pressuring our Congress and our nation to hastily implement all its recommendations. ...



We the undersigned, who have worked within various government agencies (FBI, CIA, FAA, DIA, Customs) responsible for national security and public safety, call upon you in Congress to include the voices of those with first-hand knowledge and expertise in the important issues at hand. We stand ready to do our part." Link to signatories

Paul Zarembka, PhD Paul Zarembka, PhD – Professor of Economics, State University of New York at Buffalo. Editor, The Hidden History of 9-11-2001, published by Elsevier, 2006. Essay: Initiation of the 9-11 Operation, with Evidence of Insider Trading in The Hidden History of 9-11-2001: "The peer-reviewed study in the Journal of Business by Allen Poteshman (2006) trumps casual new remarks about whether the stock market and/or airline stocks were going down before 9-11 as an explanation for rising put-option purchases. .. it goes beyond anecdotal comments ... . It is a complicated statistical exercise ... Poteshman finds ... these purchases [of options on American Airline stock] ... had only 1 percent probability of occurring simply randomly.



We have focused on option trading in AA [American Airline] and UA [United Airline]. But there is a lot more to be discussed in a more complete study. For example, Mathewson and Nol (2001) report: At Morgan Stanley ... put options jumped between Sept 6 and Sept 10 , almost 27 times a previous daily average ...



We are not surprised that the Commission avoided any and all such types of information."

"The peer-reviewed study in the Journal of Business by Allen Poteshman (2006) trumps casual new remarks about whether the stock market and/or airline stocks were going down before 9-11 as an explanation for rising put-option purchases. .. it goes beyond anecdotal comments ... . It is a complicated statistical exercise ... Poteshman finds ... these purchases [of options on American Airline stock] ... had only 1 percent probability of occurring simply randomly. We have focused on option trading in AA [American Airline] and UA [United Airline]. But there is a lot more to be discussed in a more complete study. For example, Mathewson and Nol (2001) report: At Morgan Stanley ... put options jumped between Sept 6 and Sept 10 , almost 27 times a previous daily average ... We are not surprised that the Commission avoided any and all such types of information." Editor's note: The 9/11 Commission states in its Monograph on Terrorist Financing, "The U.S. government investigation unequivocally concluded that there was no evidence of illicit trading in the U.S. markets with knowledge of the terrorist attacks. The Commission staff, after an independent review of the government investigation, has discovered no reason to doubt this conclusion." For more information on 9/11-related investment irregularities, see Ernst Welteke and William Bergman.

The 9/11 Commission states in its Monograph on Terrorist Financing, "The U.S. government investigation unequivocally concluded that there was no evidence of illicit trading in the U.S. markets with knowledge of the terrorist attacks. The Commission staff, after an independent review of the government investigation, has discovered no reason to doubt this conclusion." For more information on 9/11-related investment irregularities, see Ernst Welteke and William Bergman. Website: http://ourworld.compuserve.com

Morgan Reynolds, PhD Morgan Reynolds, PhD – Professor Emeritus, Economics, Texas A&M University. Former Director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis. Former Chief Economist, U.S. Department of Labor under George W. Bush 2001 - 2002. Video 6/2/06: "I first began to suspect that 9/11 was in inside job when the Bush-Cheney Administration invaded Iraq. … We can prove that the government's story is false." http://video.goo

"I first began to suspect that 9/11 was in inside job when the Bush-Cheney Administration invaded Iraq. … We can prove that the government's story is false." http://video.goo Essay 6/9/05: "It is hard to exaggerate the importance of a scientific debate over the cause(s) of the collapse of the twin towers [each 1300+ feet tall, 110 stories] and building 7. If the official wisdom on the collapses is wrong, as I believe it is, then policy based on such erroneous engineering analysis is not likely [to] prove to be sound." http://www.l...

"It is hard to exaggerate the importance of a scientific debate over the cause(s) of the collapse of the twin towers [each 1300+ feet tall, 110 stories] and building 7. If the official wisdom on the collapses is wrong, as I believe it is, then policy based on such erroneous engineering analysis is not likely [to] prove to be sound." http://www.l... [ Editor's note: WTC Building 7 was 610 feet tall, 47 stories, and was not hit by an airplane. It would have been the tallest building in 33 states. However, no mention of its collapse appears in the 9/11 Commission's "full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks." Watch the collapse video here. And 5 1/2 years after 9/11, the Federal government has yet to publish its promised final report that explains the cause of its collapse.]

WTC Building 7 was 610 feet tall, 47 stories, and was not hit by an airplane. It would have been the tallest building in 33 states. However, no mention of its collapse appears in the 9/11 Commission's "full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks." Watch the collapse video here. And 5 1/2 years after 9/11, the Federal government has yet to publish its promised final report that explains the cause of its collapse.] Bio: http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=bio

Daniel Orr, PhD

Daniel Orr, PhD – Professor Emeritus and former Chairman of the Department of Economics, University of Illinois. Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth Association Statement: "Research proves the current administration has been dishonest about what happened in New York and Washington, D.C. The World Trade Center was almost certainly brought down by controlled demolitions and that the available relevant evidence casts grave doubt on the government's official story about the attack on the Pentagon."

Scholars for 9/11 Truth Association Statement: "Research proves the current administration has been dishonest about what happened in New York and Washington, D.C. The World Trade Center was almost certainly brought down by controlled demolitions and that the available relevant evidence casts grave doubt on the government's official story about the attack on the Pentagon." Bio: http://www.economics.uiuc.edu/

Stephen F. LeRoy, PhD Stephen F. LeRoy, PhD – Professor of Economics, University of California, Santa Barbara. Former Visiting Economist, Federal Reserve Bank. Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth Association Statement: "Research proves the current administration has been dishonest about what happened in New York and Washington, D.C. The World Trade Center was almost certainly brought down by controlled demolitions and that the available relevant evidence casts grave doubt on the government's official story about the attack on the Pentagon."

Scholars for 9/11 Truth Association Statement: "Research proves the current administration has been dishonest about what happened in New York and Washington, D.C. The World Trade Center was almost certainly brought down by controlled demolitions and that the available relevant evidence casts grave doubt on the government's official story about the attack on the Pentagon." Bio: http://www.econ.ucsb.edu/cgi-bin/faculty.cgi?f=sleroy

Robert G. Horn, MD Robert G. Horn, MD – Clinical Professor, Department of Pathology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine. Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice. Association Statement: "Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice is a non-partisan organization consisting of independent researchers and activists engaged in uncovering the true nature of the 9/11 attacks."

Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice. Association Statement: "Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice is a non-partisan organization consisting of independent researchers and activists engaged in uncovering the true nature of the 9/11 attacks." Bio: http://www.kidneybiopsy.com/

Charles H. Hux, MD Charles H. Hux, MD – Associate Professor, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School. Faculty Member, Monmouth Medical Center. Obstetrician & Gynecologist, specialist in Maternal & Fetal Medicine. Signatory of Petition of Solidarity to the Attorney General of New York for a new independent grand jury investigation of 9/11 11/19/04: "We the undersigned: a) think that there is ample evidence and probable cause to believe that many grave and still unresolved crimes were committed by US officials prior to, during and after the events of 9/11; b) observe that most of these apparent crimes, including but not limited to abetment of mass murder, criminal negligence, insider trading, and obstruction of justice fall well within the jurisdiction of New York's top law enforcement officials ..." http://www.justicefor911.org

"We the undersigned: a) think that there is ample evidence and probable cause to believe that many grave and still unresolved crimes were committed by US officials prior to, during and after the events of 9/11; b) observe that most of these apparent crimes, including but not limited to abetment of mass murder, criminal negligence, insider trading, and obstruction of justice fall well within the jurisdiction of New York's top law enforcement officials ..." http://www.justicefor911.org Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth Association Statement: "Research proves the current administration has been dishonest about what happened in New York and Washington, D.C. The World Trade Center was almost certainly brought down by controlled demolitions and that the available relevant evidence casts grave doubt on the government's official story about the attack on the Pentagon."

Faiz Khan, MD Faiz Khan, MD – Assistant Professor of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, NY. Director of Medical Observation Unit and Assistant Residency Director - Emergency Medicine, Hershey Medical Center, Penn State College of Medicine. Practicing physician with dual board specialization in Emergency and Internal Medicine. A 9/11 first responder. Co-founder : Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance for 9/11 Truth, a group of scholars, religious leaders and activists dedicated to uniting members of the Jewish, Christian and Islamic faiths in pursuit of 9/11 truth.

: Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance for 9/11 Truth, a group of scholars, religious leaders and activists dedicated to uniting members of the Jewish, Christian and Islamic faiths in pursuit of 9/11 truth. Signatory 11/19/04: Complaint filed with the Attorney General, State of New York for a new independent grand jury investigation of 9/11.



"We, the complainant signatories below, petition the Attorney General of New York, on behalf of millions of New Yorkers who also call for a fearless independent inquiry; for the sake of residents, workers, and business owners in New York—most particularly in and near "Ground Zero" and also on behalf of other Americans who have lost employees, friends, and family members as well as health, business, and personal assets and civil, privacy, and other rights in the events of September 11, 2001 and their aftermath.



We approach your office as concerned citizens desiring to bring to light the truth about the events of 9/11." http://www.justicefor911.org

Complaint filed with the Attorney General, State of New York for a new independent grand jury investigation of 9/11. "We, the complainant signatories below, petition the Attorney General of New York, on behalf of millions of New Yorkers who also call for a fearless independent inquiry; for the sake of residents, workers, and business owners in New York—most particularly in and near "Ground Zero" and also on behalf of other Americans who have lost employees, friends, and family members as well as health, business, and personal assets and civil, privacy, and other rights in the events of September 11, 2001 and their aftermath. We approach your office as concerned citizens desiring to bring to light the truth about the events of 9/11." http://www.justicefor911.org Bio: http://www.suficircle.com/event-khan.html

John Pepper, PhD John Pepper, PhD – Assistant Professor, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona. Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice. Association Statement: "Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice is a non-partisan organization consisting of independent researchers and activists engaged in uncovering the true nature of the 9/11 attacks."

Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice. Association Statement: "Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice is a non-partisan organization consisting of independent researchers and activists engaged in uncovering the true nature of the 9/11 attacks." Bio: http://eebweb.arizona.edu/Faculty/Bios/pepper.html

http://eebweb.arizona.edu/Faculty/Bios/pepper.html CV: http://www.santafe.edu/~jpepper/CV.htm

John Rensenbrink, PhD John Rensenbrink, PhD – Professor Emeritus and former Chair of the Department of Government, Bowdoin College. Co-founder, US Green Party. Author of Against All Odds: The Green Transformation of American Politics . Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11:

"We want truthful answers to questions. … As Americans of conscience, we ask for four things:

Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11: "We want truthful answers to questions. … As Americans of conscience, we ask for four things: Immediate investigation by NY Att. General Eliot Spitzer



Immediate investigation in Congressional hearings.



Media attention to scrutinize and investigate the evidence.



The formation of a truly independent citizens-based inquiry." http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041026...

James G. Smart, PhD

No photo available James G. Smart, PhD – Professor Emeritus of History, Keene State College. Former Assistant Professor of History, University of Chattanooga. Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth Association Statement: "Research proves the current administration has been dishonest about what happened in New York and Washington, D.C. The World Trade Center was almost certainly brought down by controlled demolitions and that the available relevant evidence casts grave doubt on the government's official story about the attack on the Pentagon."

Georg Kreis, PhD Georg Kreis, PhD – Professor of History and Director of the Europe Institut of the University of Basel. President, Swiss Federal Commission Against Racism. Tages Anzeiger Article 9/9/06: "If the official and final investigation of September 11th only speaks of the collapse of two skyscrapers [omitting the collapse of Building 7, 610 feet tall, 47 stories, and not hit by an airplane] , while in fact and truth three skyscrapers collapsed in Manhattan, then it is difficult to classify the Kean Report as a solid historical source for the monumental incident that is 9/11."

English translation: http://www.danieleganser.ch

Original in German: http://www.danieleganser.ch

"If the official and final investigation of September 11th only speaks of the collapse of two skyscrapers [omitting the collapse of Building 7, 610 feet tall, 47 stories, and not hit by an airplane] , while in fact and truth three skyscrapers collapsed in Manhattan, then it is difficult to classify the Kean Report as a solid historical source for the monumental incident that is 9/11." English translation: http://www.danieleganser.ch Original in German: http://www.danieleganser.ch [ Editor's note: WTC Building 7 was 610 feet tall, 47 stories, and was not hit by an airplane. It would have been the tallest building in 33 states. However, no mention of its collapse appears in the 9/11 Commission's "full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks." Watch the collapse video here. And 5 1/2 years after 9/11, the Federal government has yet to publish its promised final report that explains the cause of its collapse.]

WTC Building 7 was 610 feet tall, 47 stories, and was not hit by an airplane. It would have been the tallest building in 33 states. However, no mention of its collapse appears in the 9/11 Commission's "full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks." Watch the collapse video here. And 5 1/2 years after 9/11, the Federal government has yet to publish its promised final report that explains the cause of its collapse.] Bio: http://www.europa.unibas.ch/cms4/index.php?id=40&L=2

Melvin A. Goodman, PhD Melvin A. Goodman, PhD – Senior Fellow at the Center for International Policy and Adjunct Professor of International Relations at Johns Hopkins University. Professor of International Security at the National War College 1986 - 2004. Former Division Chief and Senior Analyst at the Office of Soviet Affairs, CIA,1966 - 1990. Senior Analyst at the Bureau of Intelligence and Research, State Department, 1974 - 1976. Author and co-author of several books on international relations, including: Wars of Eduard Shevardnadze, Gorbachev's Retreat: The Third World, and Bush League Diplomacy: How the Neoconservatives Are Putting the World at Risk. Congressional briefing testimony 7/22/05 (p.85) : "I think the 9/11 Commission has taught me that we need to be extremely rigorous and extremely tenacious in pursuing that truth, because there is a corporate mentality in this country that is working against allowing the truth to surface, even in tragedies, such as the 9/11 tragedy. ...



I want to talk about the [9/11] Commission itself, about the flawed process of the Commission and finally about the conflict of interest within the Commission that is extremely important to understand the failure of the Commission." http://www.vt911.org

(p.85) "I think the 9/11 Commission has taught me that we need to be extremely rigorous and extremely tenacious in pursuing that truth, because there is a corporate mentality in this country that is working against allowing the truth to surface, even in tragedies, such as the 9/11 tragedy. ... I want to talk about the [9/11] Commission itself, about the flawed process of the Commission and finally about the conflict of interest within the Commission that is extremely important to understand the failure of the Commission." http://www.vt911.org Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11:

"We want truthful answers to questions. … As Americans of conscience, we ask for four things:

Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11: "We want truthful answers to questions. … As Americans of conscience, we ask for four things: Immediate investigation by NY Att. General Eliot Spitzer



Immediate investigation in Congressional hearings.



Media attention to scrutinize and investigate the evidence.



The formation of a truly independent citizens-based inquiry." http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041026...



Bio: http://ciponline.org/biographies

Major John M. Newman, PhD Major John M. Newman, PhD, U.S. Army (ret) – Professor of History and International Relations, University of Maryland. Former Executive Assistant to the Director of the National Security Agency. Former military attaché in China. 21-year career in U.S. Army Intelligence. Congressional briefing testimony 7/22/05 (p.36): "It falls to me this morning to bring to your attention the story of Saeed Sheikh, whose full name is Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh, and his astonishing rise to power in Al Qaeda, his crucial role in 9/11, which is completely, utterly, missing from the 9/11 Commission report…



The 9/11 Commission which studied US intelligence and law enforcement community performance in great detail, (maybe not so much great detail, but they did), neglected to cover the community's performance during the weeks following the attacks to determine who was responsible for them, not a word about that in the Report.



The Report does discuss the immediate US responses but the immediate investigation is never addressed, and anyone who has closely studied the post-9/11 investigation knows that the first breakthrough came two weeks into the investigation when the money transfers from the United Arab Emirates to the hijackers were uncovered.



Furthermore, if you have studied that investigation, you know there is no disputing that while investigators may have struggled with the identity of the paymaster, they were clear about one thing, he was Al Qaeda's finance chief. For this reason alone you have to ask why the 9/11 Commission Report never mentions the finance chief's role as the 9/11 paymaster." http://www.vt911.org

Michael M. Andregg, PhD Michael M. Andregg, PhD – Professor, Justice and Peace Studies, University of St. Thomas. Lecturer, University of Minnesota. Founder and Director of the Center for the Study of Intelligence and Wisdom, at Ground Zero Minnesota (a non-profit educational organization) 1982 - present. Author of On the Causes of War, winner, National Peacewriting Award for 1999. Statement to this website 1/9/07: "There is persuasive physical, photographic and other evidence to support the hypotheses of controlled demolition of the towers and of a cruise missile at the Pentagon rather than a full-sized, commercial aircraft. These require inside operators, and there is evidence of 3 or 4 intelligence agencies active behind the screen of Osama bin Laden and his 19 - 200 associates. Much of that evidence of involvement by intelligence agencies is independent of the evidence of controlled demolitions, yet must be accounted for either way one goes on engineering and physics issues. The really daunting question is what to do about this national and international security crisis once one accepts the physical impossibility of the official story."

"There is persuasive physical, photographic and other evidence to support the hypotheses of controlled demolition of the towers and of a cruise missile at the Pentagon rather than a full-sized, commercial aircraft. These require inside operators, and there is evidence of 3 or 4 intelligence agencies active behind the screen of Osama bin Laden and his 19 - 200 associates. Much of that evidence of involvement by intelligence agencies is independent of the evidence of controlled demolitions, yet must be accounted for either way one goes on engineering and physics issues. The really daunting question is what to do about this national and international security crisis once one accepts the physical impossibility of the official story." Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice

Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice Member: Scientific Panel Investigating Nine-Eleven Association Statement: "We have found solid scientific grounds on which to question the interpretation put upon the events of September 11, 2001 by the Office of the President of the United States of America and subsequently propagated by the major media of western nations."

Scientific Panel Investigating Nine-Eleven Association Statement: "We have found solid scientific grounds on which to question the interpretation put upon the events of September 11, 2001 by the Office of the President of the United States of America and subsequently propagated by the major media of western nations." Bio: Ph.D. in genetics, University of California Davis, 1977. Medical genetics research at University of Minnesota 1977 - 1979. Instructor, University of Minnesota, 1981 - present. Professor, University of St. Thomas 1993 - present. Founder and Director of the Center for the Study of Intelligence and Wisdom, at Ground Zero Minnesota 1982 - present.

Ralph Metzner, PhD Ralph Metzner, PhD – Psychologist and Professor Emeritus of Psychology, California Institute of Integral Studies and former Academic Dean, California Institute of Integral Studies. Author of Maps of Consciousness, The Well of Remembrance, The Unfolding Self, and Green Psychology. Statement to this website 1/13/07: "I've come to believe, in accord with many people who are certainly far more qualified than I am to arrive at informed judgments on this matter, and who can in no sense of the word be regarded as "conspiracy theorists", that the official 9/11 story is an unbelievable cover-up of a major crime against the American people and the world. For the sake of our collective soul and the future of our world, this story cries out to be investigated and the truth made known. Only the truth will set us free. ... As one of my teachers used to say: "knowing the truth has never hurt anyone". And we all know the corrupting effect of lies and deceit."

"I've come to believe, in accord with many people who are certainly far more qualified than I am to arrive at informed judgments on this matter, and who can in no sense of the word be regarded as "conspiracy theorists", that the official 9/11 story is an unbelievable cover-up of a major crime against the American people and the world. For the sake of our collective soul and the future of our world, this story cries out to be investigated and the truth made known. Only the truth will set us free. ... As one of my teachers used to say: "knowing the truth has never hurt anyone". And we all know the corrupting effect of lies and deceit." Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11:

"We want truthful answers to questions. … As Americans of conscience, we ask for four things:

Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11: "We want truthful answers to questions. … As Americans of conscience, we ask for four things: Immediate investigation by NY Att. General Eliot Spitzer



Immediate investigation in Congressional hearings.



Media attention to scrutinize and investigate the evidence.



The formation of a truly independent citizens-based inquiry." http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041026...



Bio: http://www.ciis.edu/faculty/metzner.html

David MacGregor, PhD David MacGregor, PhD – Professor, Department of Sociology, King's University College at the University of Western Ontario. Contributing author, The Hidden History of 9-11-2001 ("September 11 as "Machiavellian State Terror"), published by Elsevier, 2006: "September 11 may be an example of expedient destruction, ordered from within the state ... Machiavelian state terror advances the ruling agenda while disguising itself as the work of individuals or groups opposed to the state's fundamental principles. ...



I want to show how September 11 follows a typical pattern: a convenient terrorist event explained by the media in terms of widely shared stereotypical understandings and then embellished and deepened by compliant intellectuals."

("September 11 as "Machiavellian State Terror"), published by Elsevier, 2006: "September 11 may be an example of expedient destruction, ordered from within the state ... Machiavelian state terror advances the ruling agenda while disguising itself as the work of individuals or groups opposed to the state's fundamental principles. ... I want to show how September 11 follows a typical pattern: a convenient terrorist event explained by the media in terms of widely shared stereotypical understandings and then embellished and deepened by compliant intellectuals." Bio: http://publish.uwo.ca/~mcgregor/personal.html

Catherine Lowther, PhD

No photo available Catherine Lowther, PhD – Professor of Psychology, Goddard College. Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice. Association Statement: "Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice is a non-partisan organization consisting of independent researchers and activists engaged in uncovering the true nature of the 9/11 attacks."

Charles Simpson, PhD

No photo available Charles Simpson, PhD – Professor of Sociology, State University of New York, Plattsburgh. Member: Vermonters for a Real 9/11 Investigation Association Statement: "We do support a new, thorough, and truly independent forensic investigation of the events on and surrounding 9/11/2001. We believe that without such an investigation, the threat of further attacks like those of 9/11 remains unabated, our government will cont