1

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Congress established Fannie Mae in 1934 to increase liquidity in the national mortgage market.

1

Initially created as a government agency, Fannie Mae was privatized and designated as a “government-sponsored enterprise” (GSE) in 1968.

2

Fannie’s congressionally-chartered competitor, Freddie Mac, followed in 1970, and with the implicit backing of the United States government, the two GSEs began to dominate the secondary mortgage market.

3

Starting with the Clinton Administration, the federal government pressured Fannie and Freddie (“the Enterprises”) to lower underwriting standards, particularly down payment requirements, which resulted in higher leverage and decreased equity.

4

Borrowers flocked t o these affordable housing initiatives, and home prices began to skyrocket as borrowers took on riskier mortgages, causing an enormous housing bubble.

5

When the bubble burst in 2007, Fannie and Freddie began to lose billions of dollars of investments in mortgage-backed securities (MBS) guarantees.

6

In September 2008, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) took Fannie and Freddie into conservatorship as a result of mounting losses stemming from the financial crisis.

7

The Enterpris es became de facto government entities, funded by preferred stock p urchase agreements from the Department of the Treasury (Treasury).

8

Today, the Enterprises remain a m ulti-billion-dollar drag on the federal government’s finances. Since they entered conservatorshi p, Treasury has provided $169 billion to Fannie and Freddie – and the payouts are scheduled to continue with no end in sight.

9

According to recent FHFA projections, by the end of 2014, Treasury assistance to the Enterprises will total $220 billion to $311 billion.

10

Since the Enterprises have become government-funded entities, lavish payment packages have been doled out to their senior executives, and taxpayers have been footing the bill. In 2009 and 2010, the Enterprises’ top six officers were given a total of more than $35 million in compensation.

11

Of that amount, a total of $17 million in compensation was given to the CEOs of the Enterprises.

12

Additional bonus instal lments for 2010 may still be forthcoming,

13

and the

1

H. Comm. on Oversight and Gov’t Reform, The Role of Government Affordable Housing Policy in Creating the Global Financial Crisis of 2008, at 2-3 (updated May 2010) (minority staff report) [hereinafter “Committ ee Report”].

2

Id.

at 3.

3

Id.

at 3-5.

4

Id.

at 5-12.

5

Id.

at 12.

6

Fed. Housing Finance Agency Office of Inspector General, Evaluation of Federal Housing Finance Agency’s Oversight of Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s Executive Compensation Programs 7 (Mar. 31, 2011) [hereinafter “FHFA OIG Report”].

7

Id.

8

Fed. Housing Finance Agency, Projections of the Enterprises’ Financial Performance (Oct. 2011),

available at

http://www. fhfa.gov/webfile s/22738/GSEProj F.pdf.

9

Id.

10

Id.

11

FHFA OIG Report,

supra

note 6, at 12.

12

Id.

13

See

Josh Boak & Joseph Williams,

Fannie, Freddie Dole Out Big Bonuses