“All three statutes are unconstitutionally overbroad that unnecessarily infringes on defendants’ right to privacy, free expression and constitutes and unwarranted invasion into their personal life,” Miller said in the filing. “An overbroad statute is one that is designed to punish conduct which the state may rightfully punish, but which includes within its sweep constitutionally protected conduct. These obscenity laws are unconstitutional under the first and fourteenth amendments to the United States Constitution. Defendant also asserts these statutes violate the Arkansas Constitution.”