As of Nov. 2009, both the New York Times (here) and the Wikipedia (here) have selected this particular photo of Morrison with a smear on his face. Is it a coincidence that of all the photos, they selected one with this imperfection? A British newspaper (here) used the same photo, but without the imperfection. Update 25 Feb 2016:

Wikipedia has since replaced that photo. Apparently the editors decided that such obnoxious behavior was inappropriate even for the low standards of Wikipedia. Jim Morrison came from a military family. His father was a career U.S. Navy officer and a graduate of the Naval Academy. Admiral G.S. Morrison was one of the youngest Navy officers ever selected to become a Rear Admiral, at the age of 47-years-old. Then a young Ensign, Admiral Morrison was stationed at Pearl Harbor, and was an eyewitness to the attack on Dec. 7, 1941. He flew fighter aircraft in the South Pacific during the last year of WW II and again during the Korean War. Jim Morrison and his family were frequently moving during the late 1940's through the 1960's to new assignments his father was ordered to report to. While Jim Morrison was in college at UCLA film school, his father was leading a battle carrier group off the coast of South Vietnam in 1964.

You can read his biography here in this article:

signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20081128/news_1m28morrison.html Jim Morrison graduated from film school at UCLA in 1965 and he and Ray Manzarek formed The Doors in June of that year. The Vietnam war was escalating and there was a particular event that many Americans may still not have heard of yet but Admiral Morrison was very vocal about. That is an intelligence gathering ship, the U.S.S. Liberty which was stationed in the Mediterranean Sea near the Sinai Peninsula during the Six Day War between Israel and Egypt when it was attacked by Israeli fighter jets on June 8, 1967 killing 34 and wounding 171 crewmembers. The attack by the Israeli fighter jets lasted for over an hour and the crew of the U.S.S. Liberty, being a non-combat ship, had only two 50 caliber guns both fore and aft of the vessel, but never got off a shot. After the Israeli fighter aircraft attack, the U.S.S. Liberty was again attacked, this time by by Israeli torpedo boats, which fired five torpedoes, one of which hit the Liberty creating a forty-foot wide hole and killing 25 sailors. The Israeli torpedo boats also attacked with cannon fire and machine gunned defenseless American sailors in the water and as they were attempting to enter life rafts. The torpedo boats however failed to sink the U.S.S. Liberty.

At this page you can hear audio interviews of Commander James Ennes, U.S. Navy, retired, who was one of the officers on board that day. He tells in graphic detail how the attack happened and how they repeatedly told the Israelis they were an American ship. There is also an interview with a sailor who was on the U.S.S. America. During the attack, the U.S.S. Liberty was able to get off a message to its flagship the aircraft carrier U.S.S. America and said that they were under attack. The U.S.S. America immediately scrambled F-4 Phantom fighter jets, but the jets were recalled by President Lyndon Johnson. What were President Johnson's motives for doing this? Meanwhile, after the Israeli torpedo boats murdered American sailors trying to reach the safety of the life rafts, in came some Israeli helicopters with assault troops ready to board the ship and to kill the remaining crew members who had survived both attacks. The helicopters however, did not land on the ship as there was some radio traffic that suggested that U.S. fighter jets were again on their way to engage the Israelis. You can read about the account of the U.S.S. Liberty here at the Wikipedia. Keep in mind however, that Wikipedia has strong Zionist connections so they are going to try and favor Israel in a positive light. There is another website, gtr5.com from the crew of the U.S.S. Liberty. The U.S.S. Liberty flew the American flag that day so there was no question that the Israeli fighter jets did not know whose ship it was they were attacking. The Israeli fighter jets used rockets and cannon fire at the ship and many of the sailors that were hit by fragments were unrecognizable because of the damage these weapons do to the human body. Some of the sailors were also incinerated beyond recognition. Clearly, the Israelis were trying to sink this American ship. Although they claimed over the past decades that it was a mistake. Admiral Morrison thought otherwise:

Here is an excerpt from the Wikipedia of Admiral Morrison's stance against Israel (this section has since been erased, but a copy is still in their editing history here): Some believe his Naval career may have been slowed by political undertones surrounding his analysis of the U.S.S. Liberty incident which occurred in 1967. Morrison opposed the official U.S. Navy response to the attack, and proposed an immediate and swift economic and military response against Israel for the attack on an official U.S. Navy ship. [Admiral] Morrison's analysis and political motivation was at odds with the soft non-militaristic response ultimately taken by the U.S. State Department and U.S. Navy. [Admiral] Morrison asserted Israeli intentionally attacked the U.S.S. Liberty, trying to disguise Israeli torpedo boats as Syrian vessels in an attempt to provoke a war between the United States and Syria. This would have increased United State military and financial assistance during the Six Day War.

Here is a video interview of Admiral Morrison and Jim's sister Anna. At 6:11 to 6:34 in the video, Admiral Morrison makes an important point regarding how he first heard about his son's death. He says that he was contacted by the Naval attaché in Paris that Jim had died of a heart attack in a Paris hospital. The official version is that Jim Morrison died of a heart attack in his bathtub in his apartment, but there are no reports of Jim Morrison being taken to any hospital. It is possible that what Admiral Morrison heard was misinformation. However, it is also possible, during the confusion of the first few days of Jim Morrison's death, that the Zionists got their stories mixed up, and what Admiral Morrison heard was one of the incorrect versions of Morrison's death. You can see this with 9/11. During the first few days we heard many different conflicting accounts of what happened that day. At the very end of the interview, Admiral Morrison says, "Jim's moral and ethical standards were very high". However, anything that is written about Jim Morrison by the Jews is completely opposite to his description of his son. They always make him out to be an out-of-control freak, drug addict, or a disrespectful rock star. Also, there are no interviews, videos, or news reports of Pamela Courson talking about Jim Morrison's death, and 2 years, 9 months later she died mysteriously of a heroin overdose. This is significant because she may have known something about Jim Morrison's death but was afraid or threatened not to discuss it. Hopefully, she did talk about his death to someone and they will come forward with their information.



Conclusion It is possible that Zionist Jews killed Jim Morrison in retaliation for his father's stance against Israel, and wanting a U.S. military strike against that country. Jim Morrison's death was reported six days after it happened, so it may have been that the Zionist Jews had kidnapped him to put pressure on Admiral Morrison to stop his criticism of Israel and prevent a growing rebellion of high-ranking Naval and other military officers against Israel. However, something may have gone wrong and the Zionists decided to kill him. Another possibility is that the Zionists were afraid of Jim Morrison's independence. Perhaps they thought they could no longer control him so they killed him to get rid of someone who certainly had enough personal courage to expose the criminal Jews and the crimes they had committed. The Jews claim that Jim Morrison and his father, Rear Admiral Steve Morrison, didn't get along very well, but it sure does seem like they were fighting a common enemy, the Zionist Jews. Additional information about the attack of the U.S.S. Liberty:

Commander James Ennes also reports that: "According to eyewitness accounts by Israeli officers and journalists, the Israeli Army--the Army that claims to hold itself to a higher moral standard than other armies--executed as many as 1,000 Arab prisoners during the 1967 war." An Israeli military historian, Aryeh Yitzhaki also said, "That Israeli troops carried out several mass killing in 1967 in which about 1,000 Egyptian prisoners were slain in the Sinai. Yitzhaki, who worked in the Israeli army's history department after the war, said he and other officers collected testimony from dozens of soldiers who admitted killing POW's. He said a report on the killings submitted to his superiors has been locked into a safe at military headquarters." And yet another Israeli historian, Uni Milstein, said: "There were many incidents in the 1967 war in which Egyptian soldiers were killed by Israeli soldiers after they had raised their hands in surrender....It was no official policy, but there was an atmosphere that it was ok to do it, Milstein said." He also commented, "Some commanders decided to do it, others refused. But everyone knew about it." It is important to note that these murders show a pattern of how the Zionists mirror the Nazis in their killings in WW II. Indeed, as Arthur Koestler reports in his book, "The 13th Tribe," the word Nazi comes from the last four letters of Ashkenazi which is what the Khazarian Jews called themselves. You can read more about the Israeli massacre of Egyptian POWs in 1967 at El Arish here:

ussliberty.org/washrp96.txt