OAKLAND — With about a week and a half to go before its legal deadline, the city still hasn’t hashed out its budget plan for the next two fiscal years.

During its second budget hearing Tuesday, city council members Rebecca Kaplan, Nikki Fortunato Bas, Sheng Thao and Loren Taylor presented a new budget proposal — dubbed the “Oakland together” budget — which the city administrator consulted on and sets as priorities affordable housing, homeless services, combatting illegal dumping, street paving and wildfire prevention, according to the proposal.

Council members opted not to vote on that proposal until a special meeting Monday to allow more residents to weigh in and to have some remaining questions answered by city officials.

“What we pulled together with this Oakland Together budget is a balanced, fiscally responsible budget that also addresses and aligns to most of our shared values,” Taylor said at the meeting.

City administrator Sabrina Landreth has not yet submitted her official analysis of the council members’ new budget proposal. Landreth scorned an earlier proposal from Kaplan calling it “too flawed to fix” in her official analysis.

The administration views the “Oakland Together” proposal as an improvement from the last, since it addresses officials’ concerns about improper uses of restricted funds and overinflated revenue projections, Oakland spokeswoman Karen Boyd said in an email interview Wednesday. Unlike the previous proposal, the administration does not expect this one to result in layoffs or service reductions, Boyd said.

“While the administration continues to advise against changing any revenue projections to fund additional expenditures to the budget, we believe the proposed spending in the Oakland Together budget, along with the additional amendments and revisions made by other council members last night, is manageable, yet will require close monitoring,” Boyd said via email.

The administration hopes the council will adopt the budget next week, Boyd said.

The new proposal adds around $87 million in expenditures — with revenue sources identified to match — on top of the city administration’s $3.2 billion two-year plan. It seeks to use soda tax funds for parks and recreation programs, fill vacant parks maintenance positions — equivalent to 8.5 full-time employees — that the administration had proposed to freeze, put an additional $1.23 million toward wildfire prevention efforts and use about $8 million more from the city’s affordable housing trust fund for homelessness and affordable housing efforts, among other things.

The Oakland Together proposal also allocates $4.2 million for employee raises above what the administration had proposed, as well as another $8 million depending on how negotiations with labor unions shake out.

Labor unions SEIU Local 1021 and IFPTE Local 21 have been in contract negotiations with the city since February. Last week, the city declared impasse; Boyd said that was done because the parties are “substantially far apart on both city and union priorities, including wages and recruitment relief to fill vacancies.” Both unions have agreed to enter into mediation, she said.

Councilwoman Lynette Gibson McElheney, at Tuesday’s meeting, pointed out that in the past, the City Council has approved a budget before labor negotiations were wrapped up.

McElheney and Kalb both offered amendments to the “Oakland Together proposal. Among them are Kalb’s recommendations to add two motorcycle officers on top of the four sworn officers that Kaplan proposed to hire, and put an extra $1.1 million toward anti-displacement services.