Lawmakers say that any effort to give members of Congress a raise won’t pass unless both parties agree not to use the issue as a campaign weapon.

While no such agreement has been ironed out, there is a chance that there will be a bipartisan deal struck at some point this year.

Proponents of the pay hike acknowledge it’s not popular but argue that it is long overdue.

ADVERTISEMENT

The effort got a significant boost Tuesday when House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy Kevin Owen McCarthyMcCarthy says there will be a peaceful transition if Biden wins GOP lawmakers distance themselves from Trump comments on transfer of power McCarthy claims protests in Louisville, other cities are 'planned, orchestrated events' MORE (R-Calif.) offered support for a pay bump, saying he doesn’t want Congress to be a place where only the wealthy can afford to serve.

Freshman progressive Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Alexandria Ocasio-CortezOn The Money: Anxious Democrats push for vote on COVID-19 aid | Pelosi, Mnuchin ready to restart talks | Weekly jobless claims increase | Senate treads close to shutdown deadline McCarthy says there will be a peaceful transition if Biden wins Anxious Democrats amp up pressure for vote on COVID-19 aid MORE (D-N.Y.), meanwhile, forcefully made a case to her nearly 4.5 million Twitter followers, defending giving members of Congress the cost-of-living adjustment.

That came after House Democratic leaders pulled a spending bill from the floor on Monday that would allow lawmakers to get a pay raise for the first time in a decade.

At a press conference, McCarthy acknowledged the political sensitivity of a congressional raise but said it’s something legislators should consider.

“I know when you talk this subject about a COLA, a cost-of-living increase, it does an invoke an emotion — kind of an impulsive emotion. I think it’s one we should pause and look at,” McCarthy said.

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer Steny Hamilton HoyerOn The Money: Anxious Democrats push for vote on COVID-19 aid | Pelosi, Mnuchin ready to restart talks | Weekly jobless claims increase | Senate treads close to shutdown deadline Vulnerable Democrats tell Pelosi COVID-19 compromise 'essential' Anxious Democrats amp up pressure for vote on COVID-19 aid MORE (D-Md.), who has long advocated for giving lawmakers a cost-of-living adjustment, has been in talks with McCarthy on the matter.

Hoyer said Tuesday that he still intends to schedule a vote on giving lawmakers a cost-of-living adjustment this year.

“I hope we pass it so that members can have the ability to not live in their offices,” Hoyer said, referring to the lawmakers who sleep in their offices to save money on expensive Washington rent. “We don’t want to have only rich people here. You know, we want this to be the People’s House, and representative of the people.”

Ocasio-Cortez argued in a series of tweets that keeping up lawmakers’ salaries with the cost of living is consistent with advocating the same for everyone.

“It’s not a fun or politically popular position to take. But consistency is important,” Ocasio-Cortez tweeted. “ALL workers should get cost of living increases. That’s why minimum wage should be pegged to inflation, too.”

But many House Democrats in swing districts remain wary of the optics of voting to give themselves a pay raise out of fear it’ll be used against them.

“We didn’t come up here to give ourselves a raise,” said freshman Rep. Joe Cunningham Joseph CunninghamKate Schroder in Ohio among Democratic challengers squelching GOP hopes for the House Warning signs flash for Lindsey Graham in South Carolina Trump asked Chamber of Commerce to reconsider Democratic endorsements: report MORE (D-S.C.).

ADVERTISEMENT

More than a dozen Republicans also joined with battleground Democrats to submit amendments to the spending bill that sought to block the pay raise. And they’re making clear that they’ll keep pushing leadership to leave a pay raise out of any appropriations measure for legislative branch operations.

“I am pleased that enough of my colleagues agreed to join me that we were able to force leadership to put this ridiculous raise on hold,” Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick Brian K. FitzpatrickHopes for DC, Puerto Rico statehood rise Florida Democrat introduces bill to recognize Puerto Rico statehood referendum DCCC reserves new ad buys in competitive districts, adds new members to 'Red to Blue' program MORE (R-Pa.), who submitted one of the bipartisan amendments, said in a statement on Tuesday.

In the past, members of Congress would make a truce not to politicize their annual cost-of-living adjustments. For example, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee wouldn’t fully endorse the Democrat running against Newt Gingrich Newton (Newt) Leroy GingrichMORE (Ga.) in 1990 because he made an issue of the then-House GOP whip’s vote in favor of a congressional pay raise.

Freshman Rep. Dean Phillips Dean PhillipsVulnerable Democrats tell Pelosi COVID-19 compromise 'essential' Shakespeare Theatre Company goes virtual for 'Will on the Hill...or Won't They?' US Chamber of Commerce set to endorse 23 House freshman Democrats MORE (D-Minn.), who flipped a GOP-held district last fall, said both sides would have to make the jump together.

“Both sides have to lay down their arms and look at this in the context of in the private sector and in a lot of the public sector, cost of living increases are standard practice for good reason,” said Phillips, who added that he wouldn’t take a pay bump for himself if it went into effect.

But the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) initially issued a press release last week blasting Democrats as “socialist elitists” for moving forward with the pay raise. That release has since been removed from the NRCC’s website. An NRCC spokesman didn’t return a request for comment seeking an explanation.

The episode frustrated Democrats who support the cost-of-living adjustment.

“I get that it’s controversial and difficult, but I think there is bipartisan support for it. And unfortunately, the Republicans didn’t keep their side of the line,” said Rep. Pramila Jayapal Pramila JayapalHillicon Valley: Subpoenas for Facebook, Google and Twitter on the cards | Wray rebuffs mail-in voting conspiracies | Reps. raise mass surveillance concerns Bipartisan representatives demand answers on expired surveillance programs DHS opens probe into allegations at Georgia ICE facility MORE (D-Wash.). “Once it became a public bashing tool, it became a problem.”

Rep. Tom Reed Thomas (Tom) W. ReedCentrist House group offers bipartisan COVID-19 relief deal House approves two child care bills aimed at pandemic Diabetes Caucus co-chairs say telehealth expansion to continue beyond pandemic MORE (R-N.Y.) said the lack of trust between the two parties shows why it’s hard for Congress to make the case for a pay raise.

“That is yet another example of the complete failure of trust in this town,” Reed said. “To me, that’s just a natural consequence of partisan politics that has evolved to this situation.”

Members are set to automatically receive annual cost-of-living adjustments under a 1989 law unless they vote to freeze their salaries, as has been the case since 2009.

During testimony before the Select Committee on the Modernization of Congress last month, one of the co-chairmen of a bipartisan task force that led to a congressional pay raise said that both parties need to reach an agreement.

“We said essentially that we’re all in this together. We all know we need it. So, let’s stand by each other and do this as one. And it worked,” former Rep. Victor Fazio (D-Calif.) said. “You gotta get back to that.”

Rank-and-file members of Congress currently make $174,00 annually. The Speaker makes the highest salary at $223,500, while the House majority and minority leaders make $193,400.

Lawmakers are set to receive a $4,500, or 2.6 percent, raise in January unless they vote to maintain the pay freeze.

But lawmakers universally express sympathy toward the idea of raising staff salaries to help slow the revolving door to K Street. Staff can’t make more than their bosses on Capitol Hill, but they can make more money in lucrative lobbying jobs.

Freshman Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon Mary Gay ScanlonClark rolls out endorsements in assistant Speaker race Eyes turn to Ocasio-Cortez as she seeks to boost Biden What factors will shape Big Tech regulation? MORE (D-Pa.) stressed that “I’m brand new. I’m very happy to have a salary from Congress.”

But she said that she’s concerned about the impact on staff.

“I guess if that’s what it’s going to take, then maybe we do need to do it,” Scanlon said.