OAKLAND — Refusing to budge on providing lucrative stadium subsidies to the Raiders, local leaders submitted an updated stadium financing plan to the NFL Tuesday that could set the stage for a protracted fight if the team is not allowed to move to Los Angeles next season.

The five-page letter signed by Mayor Libby Schaaf and Alameda County Supervisor Scott Haggerty included no new offers of public money for the team and paled in comparison to a roughly 400-page document submitted by St. Louis, which detailed a $1.1 billion stadium plan, funded 50 percent by city and state taxpayers.

San Diego, the other city at risk of losing its team to Los Angeles, has proposed about $350 million in public subsidies, although that would be contingent on voter approval.

With NFL owners meeting next month to potentially decide which teams get to move to Los Angeles, Schaaf said Tuesday that the league and Raiders fans “understand that Oakland does not have a big check to write.”

However, Raiders owner Mark Davis, who received a draft version of the letter, took it as a sign that the city wasn’t serious about reaching a deal.

“They just don’t want to play with us,” he said early Tuesday. “I don’t know why. I don’t understand it.”

The letter suggests making available 60 acres for a new football stadium on the south end of the Coliseum property. The Raiders would be provided 8,000 surface parking spaces in the vicinity of the stadium. The team also would get to keep all game-day revenue, but would be responsible for any construction cost overruns.

Davis said the 60 acres wouldn’t meet the team’s parking needs.

“They’re trying to say (build) in the corner of the parking lot, and we’ll guarantee you parking, but we won’t tell you where,” he said. “That does not work for us.”

Davis offered his own blueprint for getting a new Oakland stadium built, saying he could potentially bring aboard someone to invest in both the team and a new facility if he gets full control over the 120-acre Coliseum complex.

“I want a clean template to build one of the nicest places in the Bay Area,” Davis said. “The acreage and the land is the starting point. If we get a commitment on the land, we can go out and market this thing.”

Davis’ stance presents a quandary for city leaders who also are trying to secure a new home for the Raiders’ co-tenant at O.Co Coliseum, the Oakland A’s, while intensively developing surrounding land with homes, offices and shops.

Both the A’s and Raiders are now on record saying they need to control the sprawling stadium site if they are to build a new home there. And the owners of both teams have expressed little interest in intensively developing the surrounding land — instead preferring to prioritize parking and freeway access for fans.

Asked for his vision of a revamped Coliseum complex, Davis said “a football stadium, parking, and … some type of ancillary development, but not on the scale that they’re talking about.”

After keeping mum for years on the team’s vision for building a new Oakland home, Davis has gone public recently as two key deadlines approached.

The city’s updated financing plan had to be submitted to the NFL by Wednesday.

And NFL owners are meeting Jan. 12 and 13 in Houston where they could decide between a Los Angeles area stadium proposal submitted by the Raiders and San Diego Chargers and a competing plan offered by the St. Louis Rams.

While the city wants the Raiders to quarterback the stadium project, it also wants the stadium to be part of a much larger development that would generate significant tax revenue.

Schaaf said the city was open to a deal that would give the Raiders control of the land, such as through a long-term lease, but only if it included benefits for the city and came at a fair market price.

With the help of an NFL stadium loan, the Raiders are offering to pay $500 million toward an estimated $900 million, 55,000-seat stadium.

Davis said that controlling all of the Coliseum land would put the Raiders in position to bring aboard an investor to buy up to 20 percent of the team, invest in the stadium and potentially develop portions of the property.

“The (funding gap) comes down with equity in the team,” Davis said. “But right now we don’t have any land to go out and do anything with.”

Schaaf again said Tuesday that development rights to the surrounding land could go toward stadium financing. And the city has offered to finance the estimated $90 million in infrastructure improvements needed at the stadium site.

NFL spokesman Brian McCarthy late Tuesday acknowledged receipt of the letter, saying only that “It is consistent with what we had been expecting as we have been (in) close contact with various officials.”

Lacking specifics for a stadium deal, Schaaf’s letter focuses on the Bay Area’s thriving economy and the Coliseum’s prime location. How much that will matter to the Raiders, if Schaaf holds firm on public subsidies, the mayor admitted is up in the air.

“At the end of the day, a lot of this is for the Raiders to decide,” Schaaf said. “And we are really hopeful that the Raiders know that Oakland is part of the Raiders and the Raiders are part of Oakland.”

Contact Matthew Artz at 510-208-6435.