A man who was being sued by his own parents for refusing to leave home has been ordered out by a judge.

New York State Supreme Court Judge Donald Greenwood told the court enough was enough.

"I want you out of that household," he said.

Michael Rotondo represented himself during the court ruling. Picture: ABC News (Supplied)

In a suit filed earlier this month in Onondaga County Supreme Court, Mark and Christina Rotondo revealed they wanted their son Michael out for good.

They claim he contributes nothing to the house or to the family in any way.

“Michael, after a discussion with your mother, we have decided that you must leave this house immediately,” the February 2 document reads, “Mark and Christina Rotondo.”

“You have 14 days to vacate. You will not be allowed to return. We will take whatever actions are necessary to enforce this decision.”

The 30-year-old said he was going to appeal the decision which he said was ridiculous. Picture: ABC News (Supplied)

Other court documents also reveal he has shown no signs of moving out and warned of further legal action if he didn't comply.

Several more notes were sent over the course of three months including one which offered him more than $1000 to find a place to stay and another urging him to get a job.

Official eviction proceedings were launched earlier this month.

Christina and Mark Rotondo issued their son several eviction notices. Picture: ABC News (Supplied)

"The practitioner is required to serve a six month notice to quit onto me to seek the removal of myself from the premises," the son told the court.

He argued as a dependent family member that time would allow him to procure the means by which he could support himself.

The couple's son moved back home more than eight years ago after losing his job and he no longer speaks to his parents, who did not comment following the court ruling.

The family's home in Upper State New York. Picture: ABC News (Supplied)

The son said he planned to appeal Judge Greenwood's decision and wasn't sure where he was now going to stay, ABC News reported.

Speaking after the latest ruling, the 30-year-old said he wasn't sure exactly what the judgement meant.

"I'm not sure exactly how it ended it seems to me I should be provided 30 days or so," he said

"I plan to appeal it."