

originally posted by: MostlyReading

a reply to: underwerks





I never "screamed" about anyting, actually I haven't seen any "screaming" at all in this thread, so calm down. I flagged the thread because it keeps focus on a murder case that many people seem to have forgotten about - or haven't even heard about since the MSM pundits are not interested talking much about it. Well, unless it is to smear people as crazy conspiracy theorists, of course.



To me personally the best proof that Seth Rich was indeed Wikileaks's source, is the fact that Wikileaks have offered a money reward for information that can help solve the murder. This is as close as you get to an actual confirmation from Wikileaks, who never reveal their sources.



Wikileaks money reward











edit on 3-3-2018 by underwerks because: (no reason given)



Your best proof of Seth Rich being the source is one of the main reasons why I don't believe it. Wikileaks.Whether the murder happened like you say or not, the article in the OP isn't proof of anything. The title to the thread is "Seth Rich's dad confirmed son was Wikileaker" and yet the article contains no statement at all from Seth Richs dad. Just a known liar (who was actually sued for making up lies about this same story) saying he was told that.That's my problem with it. If you have an actual statement or evidence, lets talk about it. Posting and supporting fake misleading threads like this isn't helping your cause.