What Hair Hears [+]Enlarge Credit: Nano Lett.

A nanosized probe can mimic sound waves by tickling microscopic hairlike projections on inner ear cells (Nano Lett., DOI: 10.1021/nl3036349). The device could help researchers understand how the cells turn sound into electrical signals the brain can interpret, the probe’s developers say.

Ear Hair Tickler [+]Enlarge Credit: Nano Lett.

Sound vibrations perturb bundles of “hair” that extend from cells in the cochlea of the inner ear. The perturbation causes ion channels in the cells’ membranes to open, creating electrical signals that are eventually relayed to the brain. “How that ion channel works isn’t known,” says Joey Doll, a former student in the laboratory of Beth Pruitt at Stanford University, who now works at a semiconductor company called SiTime.

To study the channels, scientists usually stimulate hair cell bundles with a glass rod about 10 μm across. Each hairlike fiber has a diameter of 500 nm and they bundle together in groups of 30 to 300 on each cell. These bundles respond to a wide range of frequencies of sound waves. But, because of the glass probe’s large size, it moves slowly and as a result, can mimic only low-frequency sounds, Doll says. Doll, Pruitt, and colleagues wanted to access higher frequencies so they built a smaller probe.

Their nanoprobe consists of two parts: a sensor and an actuator. The actuator generates the sensor’s motion, converting an electric current to a mechanical force. The sensor, just 2 μm wide, pushes on the hair cell bundles. When the researchers switch on the current, the probe tip flicks the hair cells to simulate sound vibrations.

Sign up for C&EN's must-read weekly newsletter Email Address * Subscribe » Contact us to opt out anytime

To test the device, researchers removed ear tissue from rats and placed it under a microscope. Then, using a micromanipulator, they positioned the nanoprobe near a hair cell bundle and placed an electrode on the cell to detect the ion channel opening. For comparison, the researchers repeated the experiment with a glass probe. The nanoprobe moved far faster than the glass probe, achieving frequencies up to 80 kHz compared to the glass probe’s 10 kHz. Both devices triggered the opening of ion channels, according to patch clamp measurements.