Margaret Cho. Credit:Michael Tran Instead, we do our best to present our case, hope we're actually listened to, and then later vent to our friends about the latest round of extracurricular emotional labour we've had to do in our workplace, in our school, on the bus ride home, or wherever it occurred. There is absolutely nothing surprising about Cho's emails or her account on the podcast; both will be familiar to anyone from marginalised backgrounds or who faces systemic discrimination. Moments after this much-talked-about segment of the podcast, host Bobby Lee and Cho talk about the danger of being vocal about the shortage of quality roles, and the discrimination they face, because it can lead to a backlash in the industry. This is the context through which the emails should be read – one which acknowledges the playing field is in no way equal. With that in mind, let's turn to the emails themselves. Plenty of people have come to Swinton's defence with variations of the line, look how genuine she is, isn't this what we want to see? Personally, I think a privileged person approaching a member of the underprivileged, whom they don't even personally know, to say "please explain to me how I've participated in your oppression" isn't something to champion. Especially when it comes after the fact. I'd be a lot more generous in my reading of these emails if they'd taken place before Swinton accepted the role, for example. Coming as they do, however, the whole thing reeks of white guilt seeking to be absolved.

Tilda Swinton as The Ancient One in Marvel's 'Doctor Strange'. In the first email, Swinton says "the diversity debate has come knocking at the door" of Doctor Strange, but also that she is "unaware of what exactly anybody has said about any of it." Obviously, she was aware enough to have her arguments ready in the following emails; and equally obvious, despite saying she wanted to listen more than speak, she had plenty to say. Having plenty to say despite openly admitting you haven't read anything on the subject surely sums up the white condition in 2016 (see: Trump) - in addition to expecting random people to educate you. This, perhaps more than anything, is the most aggravating part of the exchange. The articles, essays, books, and speeches written by people of colour already exist, and the arguments have been made a thousand times. Breezily saying you haven't bothered with any of it is the epitome of privilege. Now there are some who will say, don't "shame" Swinton, she was earnest in seeking to understand more. Don't discourage others from wanting to learn. These are the same people who probably say "don't call racist people racists", because it turns them away. I have news for you: if the idea that you could be wrong about something discourages you from learning, you probably weren't that interested to begin with. Besides which, I'm not interested in coddling the feelings of powerful and the privileged. I have neither the time nor the energy, which is devoted to trying to survive the near-constant attacks on my sexuality, my culture, and my rights, and to protect other marginalised communities from the same.