Democrats are wary of calls to nix the 60-vote legislative filibuster if they retake the Senate in 2020.

The filibuster is quickly becoming a divisive topic in what’s expected to a crowded Democratic presidential primary, which already includes several senators.

A coalition of progressives is trying to make it a wedge issue, arguing it should be done away with if Democrats take the majority because it would stand in the way of a Democratic president getting signature legislation passed through Congress.

ADVERTISEMENT

But several Democratic senators are cool to the idea. They worry that taking the dramatic step would effectively defang the minority party and freeze any hope of bipartisanship.

They also think the change would turn the Senate into the House, where the majority completely rules.

“The Senate is the Senate. I served in the House, I don’t want to serve in the House again,” said Sen. Dick Durbin Richard (Dick) Joseph DurbinTumultuous court battle upends fight for Senate McConnell focuses on confirming judicial nominees with COVID-19 talks stalled Senate Republicans signal openness to working with Biden MORE (Ill.), the No. 2 Senate Democrat. “There comes a time when the Senate has a responsibility to protect the minority.”

Sen. Joe Manchin Joseph (Joe) ManchinTrump meets with potential Supreme Court pick Amy Coney Barrett at White House Names to watch as Trump picks Ginsburg replacement on Supreme Court Momentum growing among Republicans for Supreme Court vote before Election Day MORE (D-W.Va.), asked if he would support getting rid of the legislative filibuster, also quickly shot down the idea.

“Never,” he said. “It’s a function of our presence of the Senate basically trying to bring this country together and keep it together.”

The fight comes as Democrats roll out myriad big idea proposals, including a single-payer health care system often referred to as “Medicare for all” and a Green New Deal that would pump money into the creation of green jobs and policies to reduce climate change.

Those advocating for the end of the filibuster say such bills will be dead on arrival in the Senate even if they are passed by the House.

Even if Democrats are able to win back the chamber in 2020, they are unlikely to win support from Republicans to get 60 votes on many measures.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ezra Levin, the co-executive director of Indivisible, said on Thursday that the “Green New Deal will never happen while the filibuster lives.”

“Believing you can pass the Green New Deal without axing the filibuster is a little like believing climate change will go away on its own,” he added in a string of tweets.

The procedural fight kicked into high gear late last week after Sen. Elizabeth Warren Elizabeth WarrenJudd Gregg: The Kamala threat — the Californiaization of America GOP set to release controversial Biden report Biden's fiscal program: What is the likely market impact? MORE (D-Mass.) said that nixing the 60-vote legislative filibuster should be “on the table” if Democrats win back the Senate and the White House in the 2020 elections.

“You keep it all on the table. Don't take anything off the table,” she told Politico.

Other 2020 contenders have not gone so far.

Sen. Cory Booker Cory Anthony BookerBipartisan praise pours in after Ginsburg's death DHS opens probe into allegations at Georgia ICE facility Democratic lawmakers call for an investigation into allegations of medical neglect at Georgia ICE facility MORE (D-N.J.) said that he would “personally resist” any attempts to get rid of the filibuster.

“My colleagues and I, everybody I've talked to, believe the legislative filibuster should stay there,” he said.

That brought a brushback from progressives. The website Think Progress wrote a headline about the comments that stated: “Democratic Senator Cory Booker promises to sabotage the Democratic Party’s legislative agenda.”

It’s not just progressives who have discussed getting rid of the filibuster.

President Trump Donald John TrumpBubba Wallace to be driver of Michael Jordan, Denny Hamlin NASCAR team Graham: GOP will confirm Trump's Supreme Court nominee before the election Southwest Airlines, unions call for six-month extension of government aid MORE has repeatedly urged Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell Addison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellGraham: GOP will confirm Trump's Supreme Court nominee before the election Trump puts Supreme Court fight at center of Ohio rally The Memo: Dems face balancing act on SCOTUS fight MORE (R-Ky.) to kill it off, arguing it was keeping Republicans from enacting their agenda.

“Mitch, use the Nuclear Option and get it done! Our Country is counting on you!” Trump said in a tweet late last year, referring to a Senate rule that would be used to end the filibuster.

McConnell, a Senate traditionalist, has repeatedly said that he does not have the votes within the caucus to end the filibuster.

The Senate has made changes to its filibuster rule in recent years.

Democrats, led by then-Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid Harry Mason ReidOn The Trail: Battle over Ginsburg replacement threatens to break Senate Democrats fear Russia interference could spoil bid to retake Senate Graham signals support for confirming a Supreme Court nominee this year MORE (D-Nev.), nixed the 60-vote threshold for most nominations in 2013, requiring that a nomination only get a simple majority to break a filibuster. Republicans got rid of the same hurdle for Supreme Court nominations in 2017.

Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer Chuck SchumerJacobin editor: Primarying Schumer would force him to fight Trump's SCOTUS nominee CNN's Toobin: Democrats are 'wimps' who won't 'have the guts' to add Supreme Court seats Republican senator says plans to confirm justice before election 'completely consistent with the precedent' MORE (D-N.Y.) — who would presumably be majority leader if Democrats took back the chamber — has expressed regret that Democrats triggered the nuclear option in 2013.

“I argued against it at the time. I said both for Supreme Court and in Cabinet should be 60 because on such important positions there should be some degree of bipartisanship,” Schumer told CNN in 2017.

Some Senate Democrats have pitched a rules package during previous Congresses that would have included changes to the filibuster, like getting rid of the filibuster on motions to proceed.

Sen. Chris Murphy Christopher (Chris) Scott MurphyDemocratic senator calls for 'more flexible' medical supply chain to counter pandemics The Hill's 12:30 Report - Presented by Facebook - Don't expect a government check anytime soon GOP chairman to release interim report on Biden probe 'in about a week' MORE (D-Conn.) said that he would be open to changes to the legislative filibuster and noted that roughly 45 Democrats backed changes pitched by Sens. Jeff Merkley Jeffrey (Jeff) Alan MerkleyThe Hill's Morning Report - Sponsored by The Air Line Pilots Association - Trump, Biden renew push for Latino support Sunday shows - Trump team defends coronavirus response Oregon senator says Trump's blame on 'forest management' for wildfires is 'just a big and devastating lie' MORE (D-Ore.) and Tom Udall Thomas (Tom) Stewart UdallLWCF modernization: Restoring the promise OVERNIGHT ENERGY: House Democrats tee up vote on climate-focused energy bill next week | EPA reappoints controversial leader to air quality advisory committee | Coronavirus creates delay in Pentagon research for alternative to 'forever chemicals' Senate Democrats demand White House fire controversial head of public lands agency MORE (D-N.M.) in 2013.

“I’d take a look at it. You know, I’ve always thought that our Founding Fathers are probably rolling in their graves watching how hard we’ve made it to pass legislation. They set up a system of government that was already designed to be intentionally difficult to change, we’ve made it even harder,” he said.

Twenty-eight Democrats currently in the Senate signed a letter to McConnell and Schumer in 2017, after Republicans got rid of the 60-vote filibuster for Supreme Court nominees, supporting keeping the legislative filibuster.

Sen. Tim Kaine Timothy (Tim) Michael KaineTrump meets with potential Supreme Court pick Amy Coney Barrett at White House Names to watch as Trump picks Ginsburg replacement on Supreme Court Barrett seen as a front-runner for Trump Supreme Court pick MORE (D-Va.) said on Thursday that while he supported getting rid of the 60-vote filibuster for executive nominees and lower court picks, “the 60 vote requirement [for legislation] serves an important purpose. … I am not yet convinced we need to make that change on legislation.”

Sen. Christopher Coons Christopher (Chris) Andrew CoonsMurkowski: Supreme Court nominee should not be taken up before election Battle lines drawn on precedent in Supreme Court fight Sunday shows - Ruth Bader Ginsburg's death dominates MORE (D-Del.), who helped organize the 2017 letter, said progressives who want to get rid of the filibuster are “wrong.”

“The strong temptation of the opportunity to achieve some short-term legislative gains will be outweighed in the long term by losing the one barrier that prevents the Senate from allowing whatever passion is currently running through the House and the presidency from becoming law,” he said.

Asked if he thought the caucus would support getting rid of the 60-vote legislative filibuster, he added: “President Trump thinks it’s a great idea to get rid of it. Perhaps progressives should think that over.”