I’m not sure why Progressives are still using the Washington Post as a legitimate source. It’s time we use our muscle, as a majority of Americans identify as Progressive on most issues. One of the only ways we are going to be able to do this is by boycotts.

With corporations and the Central Bank firmly in control of our Intelligence Deep State, probably the President, and undoubtedly our Congress, we have only our money and where we spend it to influence anything that these entities do. This should be a conversation we are having about Comcast and net neutrality, media entities including WaPo, and Insurance Companies/Single Payer (more on these in a follow-up article).

But this is about the Washington Post and the fact that the main portion of its reporting is nothing more than Deep State propaganda and has been for years. We know Bezos received $600 million dollars in a separate deal for buying the Post, as these multi-billionaires are handed our tax dollars for their own benefit.

We are unable to do anything to stop our Deep State from controlling every aspect of our government. Outright revolution could lead to millions of Americans killed while the elites scramble to maintain their freedom, wealth, and lives. In fact, if we want to exert any will over the elite bankers and their colluding government associates, while maintaining peace in this country, this is all we can do.

Let’s review just a few of the times we have seen the Washington Post publish an article that is highly suggestive and inflammatory, while still providing weak-sauce “anonymous sources.”

It’s important to address the fact that some articles at WaPo are legitimate, hard-hitting journalism. It is unfortunate that journalists with integrity would choose to be published in a known propaganda source. Because some articles are accurate at the Washington Post, does not mean we should continue to use them for sources of truth, in fact, we should refrain from using the CIA leak source at all. We need reporters to refuse to write for a media company that has integrity only when it feels like it. Why potentially stain such work by publishing it in a newspaper that is only honest when it decides it want to be?

The solution is clear, and it needs to be used as a peaceful way to fight back the elite which have near total control of us: neither write for, nor read, nor share articles from a newspaper that is not 100% committed to factual publishing. Starting immediately.