Acting Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Andrew Wheeler joined others in the Trump administration Wednesday in criticizing last week’s major climate change report for describing a “worst-case scenario.”

At a Washington Post event, Wheeler said the report “was written in 2016, and was at the direction of the previous administration,” speculating that the Obama administration “told the report’s authors to take a look at the worst-case scenario for this report.”

“I think a lot of the worst-case scenario information in that assessment is what’s concerning a lot of people in this administration,” he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Wheeler said the latest National Climate Assessment, released last week by the federal government, largely ignored the likelihood that innovations in the future would reduce greenhouse gas emissions, instead assuming that emissions will remain steady.

“I don’t think the assessment really took into account the innovation that we’ve seen and the technological advancement that we’ve seen in recent years. It basically freezes technology going forward,” he said.

The assessment forecast that by 2100, climate change could cause billions of dollars in economic losses — as much as a 10 percent loss of gross domestic product (GDP) — and kill thousands of people, among other impacts.

Wheeler’s critique largely reflects recent comments by President Trump Donald John TrumpSteele Dossier sub-source was subject of FBI counterintelligence probe Pelosi slams Trump executive order on pre-existing conditions: It 'isn't worth the paper it's signed on' Trump 'no longer angry' at Romney because of Supreme Court stance MORE, Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke Ryan Keith ZinkeTrump extends Florida offshore drilling pause, expands it to Georgia, South Carolina Conspicuous by their absence from the Republican Convention Trump flails as audience dwindles and ratings plummet MORE and White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders.

The EPA chief on Wednesday acknowledged that the worst case was just one of many scenarios the report examined, but he criticized the media for focusing on the worst case.

He argued that even the better cases “downplay innovation, innovation we’ve already seen in the marketplace."

Wheeler also said the report’s GDP predictions were based on research funded by liberal environmental activist Tom Steyer.

The 2017 research was conducted by scientists from institutions like the University of California Berkeley, Rutgers University and University of Chicago. Steyer’s Next Generation funded it in part, as well as the National Science Foundation, the Department of Energy and others.

The acting EPA head, whom Trump said this month he will nominate for Senate confirmation to the post, said he did not look at the report before it was released, though he is in the process of reading through it now.

For future reports, Wheeler wants researchers to use methods that reflect less-dire scenarios.

“We need to take a look at the model that’s used for the next assessment. I think we need to get some more realistic projection on technology and innovation.”