“There’s this enormous conflict between what we need to do in a democracy in the midst of a pandemic. You can’t have a stay-at-home order but then tell millions of people to go stand in line and congregate near one another across the state,” said Racine Mayor Cory Mason. "Having an election in the middle of a stay-at-home order makes no sense. It did not have to be this way.”

The intraparty conflict in Wisconsin is a bad look in a state that's central to the party's hopes of beating President Donald Trump in November. It also doesn’t bode well for a unified message in the run-up to the Democratic convention in Milwaukee, an event that was just pushed back a month to August.

While Democrats across Wisconsin have called for postponing the election, pointing to health concerns and the inability to staff polling sites, Evers has cited his limited authority to impose a delay against Republican resistance in the Legislature.

Evers has advocated that residents vote by mail and called on lawmakers to ease up on election day requirements to allow more flexibility on when ballots could be turned in and counted.

On Thursday, a federal judge provided some relief. While refusing to move the primary, U.S. District Judge William Conley extended the deadline by one day to request absentee ballots and is allowing voters six additional days after Election Day to return them. Conley in a Wednesday ruling said his hands were tied to postpone the election and called out both Evers and the legislature for not taking the action themselves.



The Wisconsin city of Waukesha settles on one polling place for in-person voting for Election Day due to the coronavirus. | Rick Wood/Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel via AP



And in interviews with POLITICO, more than a dozen Democratic officials in the state expressed frustration that Evers didn't act sooner. They argue that he hasn't tapped the full range of his powers, such as calling for a special legislative session or announcing an election delay and forcing someone to stop him. That's essentially what Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine did last month, even in the face of an adverse court ruling.

Mason, a Democrat who served in the Wisconsin state Legislature for 11 years, described local officials as “exasperated” over trying to carry out an election amid the pandemic. Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett had urged people not to go the polls on election day to vote for him — but instead to do so by mail ahead of time.

Polling places across the state are down at least 7,000 poll workers already. Only a fraction of polling sites are expected to be open in Milwaukee, an area that serves large African American and minority populations.

But Evers' office said the governor is unlikely to change course.

“Our democracy is essential, it must go on. Keeping people safe is the governor’s top priority but we want people to participate in this election. We want as many people as possible to vote from home,” Evers spokeswoman Melissa Baldauff told POLITICO. "We hope the Legislature would work with the governor to extend the time for [ballots] to be counted and to be received.”

She dismissed the possibility of the governor attempting to halt the election like DeWine did. “It’s not going to happen," Baldauff said. "He doesn’t want to do it and he also doesn’t have the authority to do it.”

The governor’s office has argued that there's no certain future date when the health crisis would relent. Officials also said that a delay would put at risk hundreds of nonpartisan positions on the ballot — including the mayor of Milwaukee — that under statute would be vacant if the election does not take place on Tuesday. That scenario, the governor's office said, would create even more chaos amid a public health emergency. But critics say it is a gray area that Evers could have exploited through the Legislature or the courts to find a bridge solution until the health crisis abates.

Assembly Minority Leader Gordon Hintz agreed the governor could not act unilaterally. But Hintz also said holding the election Tuesday will put people's health at risk and expose the state to more lawsuits.

It's "an exercise in futility. That appears to be the way we’re headed now," Hintz said. “Every day people realize how serious this is. We already have major problems with people’s abilities to vote — with absentee ballots requested two weeks ago not being received.

"It’s a pretty bad idea to go through with this.”

While Evers has advocated that residents vote by mail, complaints are streaming in from people across the state that they haven’t received absentee ballots in the mail. Evers’ decision to bring in the National Guard to assist with election day is introducing its own concerns, from questions about how to expedite training to fears that a military presence will turn off hordes of potential voters.

“We have three branches of government to ensure a system of checks and balances, and questions about our elections typically rely on all three playing a role. If I could have changed the election on my own I would have but I can’t without violating state law,” Evers tweeted Wednesday. “I’ve asked the legislature to do its part to ensure a fair, safe election and I hope we can get some clarity as soon as possible. The bottom line is that we have to keep folks safe and we have to make sure everyone who wants to vote has the opportunity to make their voice heard.”

“All three branches of government have failed to do anything,” Mason said. “The governor has refused to call a special session. The Legislature has failed to call a special session,” and a federal judge who heard a case on Wednesday seemed to hint he would not intervene, he said. “Nobody has stepped up to the plate.”

Evers on Friday called for absentee ballots to be mailed to every Wisconsin resident, a proposal rejected by the Republican-majority Assembly. But Democrats expressed frustration that Evers hadn’t pressed the issue by ordering a special session. Baldauff said Evers' powers extend only so far; Republicans had already indicated they would not budge and pointed to a previous special session in which they gaveled in and out without taking action.

But critics say forcing the matter again would put the onus on Republicans to act. They also complain Evers' office intervened in an ongoing lawsuit only at the eleventh hour — and even then, he proposed a middle-ground solution rather than siding with mayors and progressive groups that filed lawsuits calling for the election to be delayed or voting extended.

“It’s been a cataclysmic failure,” said one Wisconsin-based Democratic strategist who supported Evers’ 2018 campaign. “It has been disappointment after disappointment. I do not believe that he’s shown leadership or good judgment during this crisis.”

Green Bay Mayor Eric Genrich said he pressed Evers earlier this month to consider alternatives. On top of public health concerns, Genrich said, the electoral system could not withstand the strain of holding an election amid a pandemic that’s caused a backlog in processing ballots and sidelining poll workers.

“I had a conversation with him several weeks back, I expressed my frustrations to him. I didn’t want to file a lawsuit but said that was my intention if things were not resolved,” Genrich said. “I’ve been very upfront with him and his staff and legislators about how strongly we feel about how difficult it would be and how wrongheaded it would be to move forward with an election. But unfortunately, we have gotten no action.”

The Wisconsin Democratic Party broke with the governor on Wednesday and called for a delay in Tuesday's election. In an interview, however, Democratic Party Chairman Ben Wikler defended Evers.

"The governor is overseeing the whole coronavirus response in Wisconsin," Wikler said, "and one piece of that is doing everything he can to make the election safe under current law while urging the Legislature to change the law."