Additional Notes

Some important notes:

--------1) While a competitor with a better overall description is indeed more likely to win, they are not guaranteed to win. There is additional randomness beyond the description of the competitor, which even I cannot predict. DO NOT BET EVERYTHING ON ONE FIGHT. You will eventually lose and it will be all your own fault.2) The delineation of Very Good / Good / Average, etc. is mostly arbitrary. There are not obvious categories in the actual win/loss data. There are differences between descriptions in a single category that are larger than the difference between some of the descriptions in adjacent categories. Where possible, rely on description differences that are at least two categories apart (e.g. Good is definitely better than Bad; Very Bad is much worse than Average). If I eventually get enough data to be confident in a more precise ranking system, I'll consider adding it.3) There's an additional Descriptor that will appear in the Brawler's Pit called "Brawl Pit". Since I did most of my fights in the Fighter's Pit, I don't have enough data to confidently list it, but I would assume it's similar to "Black Market" and falls in the Average category.4) 'Veteran' variants of a given title appear to be consistently better than their non-veteran counterpart. For example, a Veteran Warrior is believed to be better than a Warrior. However, one should not assume all Veterans are better than all non-Veterans (e.g. don't assume a Veteran Fighter is better than a Warrior).5) I've been tracking competitors with the "Sir" part in their name. So far it doesn't seem to make much difference compared to those without it. If there is an advantage to having it for brawling, it's quite small.If you have any questions or feedback feel free to leave a comment.