1. Fredriksson, R., Lagerström, M. C., Lundin, L. G. & Schiöth, H. B. The G-protein-coupled receptors in the human genome form five main families. Phylogenetic analysis, paralogon groups, and fingerprints. Mol. Pharmacol. 63, 1256–1272 (2003).

2. Neves, S. R., Ram, P. T. & Iyengar, R. G protein pathways. Science 296, 1636–1639 (2002).

3. Gurevich, E. V. & Gurevich, V. V. Arrestins: ubiquitous regulators of cellular signaling pathways. Genome Biol. 7, 236 (2006).

4. Zhou, X. E., Melcher, K. & Xu, H. E. Understanding the GPCR biased signaling through G protein and arrestin complex structures. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 45, 150–159 (2017).

5. Palczewski, K. et al. Crystal structure of rhodopsin: a G protein-coupled receptor. Science 289, 739–745 (2000).

6. Cherezov, V. et al. High-resolution crystal structure of an engineered human β 2 -adrenergic G protein-coupled receptor. Science 318, 1258–1265 (2007).

7. Rosenbaum, D. M. et al. GPCR engineering yields high-resolution structural insights into beta2-adrenergic receptor function. Science 318, 1266–1273 (2007).

8. Xu, F. et al. Structure of an agonist-bound human A 2A adenosine receptor. Science 332, 322–327 (2011).

9. Lebon, G. et al. Agonist-bound adenosine A 2A receptor structures reveal common features of GPCR activation. Nature 474, 521–525 (2011).

10. Choe, H. W. et al. Crystal structure of metarhodopsin II. Nature 471, 651–655 (2011).

11. Wang, C. et al. Structural basis for molecular recognition at serotonin receptors. Science 340, 610–614 (2013).

12. Standfuss, J. et al. The structural basis of agonist-induced activation in constitutively active rhodopsin. Nature 471, 656–660 (2011).

13. Rosenbaum, D. M. et al. Structure and function of an irreversible agonist–β 2 adrenoceptor complex. Nature 469, 236–240 (2011).

14. Rasmussen, S. G. et al. Crystal structure of the β 2 adrenergic receptor–G s protein complex. Nature 477, 549–555 (2011).

15. Zhang, Y. et al. Cryo-EM structure of the activated GLP-1 receptor in complex with a G protein. Nature 546, 248–253 (2017).

16. Liang, Y. L. et al. Phase-plate cryo-EM structure of a class B GPCR-G-protein complex. Nature 546, 118–123 (2017).

17. Flock, T. et al. Selectivity determinants of GPCR–G-protein binding. Nature 545, 317–322 (2017).

18. Palczewski, K. G protein-coupled receptor rhodopsin. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 75, 743–767 (2006).

19. Zhou, X. E., Melcher, K. & Xu, H. E. Structure and activation of rhodopsin. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 33, 291–299 (2012).

20. Hamm, H. E. How activated receptors couple to G proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 4819–4821 (2001).

21. Van Meurs, K. P. et al. Deduced amino acid sequence of bovine retinal G oα : similarities to other guanine nucleotide-binding proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 84, 3107–3111 (1987).

22. Lerea, C. L., Somers, D. E., Hurley, J. B., Klock, I. B. & Bunt-Milam, A. H. Identification of specific transducin α subunits in retinal rod and cone photoreceptors. Science 234, 77–80 (1986).

23. Kang, Y. et al. Crystal structure of rhodopsin bound to arrestin by femtosecond X-ray laser. Nature 523,561–567 (2015).

24. Zhou, X. E. et al. Identification of phosphorylation codes for arrestin recruitment by G protein-coupled receptors. Cell 170, 457–469 (2017).

25. Maeda, S. et al. Crystallization scale preparation of a stable GPCR signaling complex between constitutively active rhodopsin and G-protein. PLoS One 9, e98714 (2014).

26. Liu, P. et al. The structural basis of the dominant negative phenotype of the Gα i1 β 1 γ 2 G203A/A326S heterotrimer. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 37, 1259–1272 (2016).

27. Van Eps, N. et al. Conformational equilibria of light-activated rhodopsin in nanodiscs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E3268–E3275 (2017).

28. Van Eps, N. et al. G i - and G s -coupled GPCRs show different modes of G-protein binding. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1721896115 (2018).

29. Oldham, W. M., Van Eps, N., Preininger, A. M., Hubbell, W. L. & Hamm, H. E. Mechanism of the receptor-catalyzed activation of heterotrimeric G proteins. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13, 772–777 (2006).

30. Oldham, W. M. & Hamm, H. E. Heterotrimeric G protein activation by G-protein-coupled receptors. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 60–71 (2008).

31. Marin, E. P., Krishna, A. G. & Sakmar, T. P. Rapid activation of transducin by mutations distant from the nucleotide-binding site: evidence for a mechanistic model of receptor-catalyzed nucleotide exchange by G proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 27400–27405 (2001).

32. Marin, E. P., Krishna, A. G. & Sakmar, T. P. Disruption of the α5 helix of transducin impairs rhodopsin-catalyzed nucleotide exchange. Biochemistry 41, 6988–6994 (2002).

33. Garcia, P. D., Onrust, R., Bell, S. M., Sakmar, T. P. & Bourne, H. R. Transducin-α C-terminal mutations prevent activation by rhodopsin: a new assay using recombinant proteins expressed in cultured cells. EMBO J. 14, 4460–4469 (1995).

34. Onrust, R. et al. Receptor and βγ binding sites in the alpha subunit of the retinal G protein transducin. Science 275, 381–384 (1997).

35. Skiba, N. P., Bae, H. & Hamm, H. E. Mapping of effector binding sites of transducin alpha-subunit using Gα t /Gα i1 chimeras. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 413–424 (1996).

36. Sun, D. et al. Probing Gα i1 protein activation at single-amino acid resolution. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 22, 686–694 (2015).

37. Itoh, Y., Cai, K. & Khorana, H. G. Mapping of contact sites in complex formation between light-activated rhodopsin and transducin by covalent crosslinking: use of a chemically preactivated reagent. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 4883–4887 (2001).

38. Subramaniam, S., Gerstein, M., Oesterhelt, D. & Henderson, R. Electron diffraction analysis of structural changes in the photocycle of bacteriorhodopsin. EMBO J. 12, 1–8 (1993).

39. Subramaniam, S. & Henderson, R. Molecular mechanism of vectorial proton translocation by bacteriorhodopsin. Nature 406, 653–657 (2000).

40. Slessareva, J. E. et al. Closely related G-protein-coupled receptors use multiple and distinct domains on G-protein α-subunits for selective coupling. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 50530–50536 (2003).

41. Kling, R. C., Lanig, H., Clark, T. & Gmeiner, P. Active-state models of ternary GPCR complexes: determinants of selective receptor–G-protein coupling. PloS One 8, (2013).

42. DeVree, B. T. et al. Allosteric coupling from G protein to the agonist-binding pocket in GPCRs. Nature 535, 182–186 (2016).

43. Dror, R. O. et al. Signal transduction. Structural basis for nucleotide exchange in heterotrimeric G proteins. Science 348, 1361–1365 (2015).

44. Dickson, B. M., de Waal, P. W., Ramjan, Z. H., Xu, H. E. & Rothbart, S. B. A fast, open source implementation of adaptive biasing potentials uncovers a ligand design strategy for the chromatin regulator BRD4. J. Chem. Phys. 145, 154113 (2016).

45. Huang, W. J. et al. Structural insights into μ-opioid receptor activation. Nature 524, 315–321 (2015).

46. Rose, A. S. et al. Position of transmembrane helix 6 determines receptor G protein coupling specificity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 11244–11247 (2014).

47. Caro, L. N. et al. Rapid and facile recombinant expression of bovine rhodopsin in HEK293S GnTI− cells using a PiggyBac inducible system. Methods Enzymol. 556, 307–330 (2015).

48. Hornsby, M. et al. A high through-put platform for recombinant antibodies to folded proteins. Mol. Cell Proteomics 14, 2833–2847 (2015).

49. Paduch, M. & Kossiakoff, A. A. Generating conformation and complex-specific synthetic antibodies. Methods Mol. Biol. 1575, 93–119 (2017).

50. Scheres, S. H. RELION: implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination. J. Struct. Biol. 180, 519–530 (2012).

51. Brilot, A. F. et al. Beam-induced motion of vitrified specimen on holey carbon film. J. Struct. Biol. 177, 630–637 (2012).

52. Rohou, A. & Grigorieff, N. CTFFIND4: fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J. Struct. Biol. 192, 216–221 (2015).

53. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).

54. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D 60, 2126–2132 (2004).

55. Wang, R. Y. et al. Automated structure refinement of macromolecular assemblies from cryo-EM maps using Rosetta. eLife 5, e17219 (2016).

56. Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 213–221 (2010).

57. Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 12–21 (2010).

58. Manglik, A. et al. Structural insights into the dynamic process of β 2 -adrenergic receptor signaling. Cell 161, 1101–1111 (2015).

59. Šali, A. & Blundell, T. L. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 234, 779–815 (1993).

60. Mahalingam, M., Martínez-Mayorga, K., Brown, M. F. & Vogel, R. Two protonation switches control rhodopsin activation in membranes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 17795–17800 (2008).

61. Ranganathan, A., Dror, R. O. & Carlsson, J. Insights into the role of Asp792.50 in β 2 adrenergic receptor activation from molecular dynamics simulations. Biochemistry 53, 7283–7296 (2014).

62. Huang, J. et al. CHARMM36m: an improved force field for folded and intrinsically disordered proteins. Nat. Methods 14, 71–73 (2017).

63. Zoete, V., Cuendet, M. A., Grosdidier, A. & Michielin, O. SwissParam: a fast force field generation tool for small organic molecules. J. Comput. Chem. 32, 2359–2368 (2011).

64. Bussi, G., Donadio, D. & Parrinello, M. Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. J. Chem. Phys. 126, 014101 (2007).

65. Dickson, B. M., de Waal, P. W., Ramjan, Z. H., Xu, H. E. & Rothbart, S. B. A fast, open source implementation of adaptive biasing potentials uncovers a ligand design strategy for the chromatin regulator BRD4. J. Chem. Phys. 145, 154113 (2016).

66. Dickson, B. M. Overfill protection and hyperdynamics in adaptively biased simulations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 13, 5925–5932 (2017).

67. Kohlhoff, K. J. et al. Cloud-based simulations on Google Exacycle reveal ligand modulation of GPCR activation pathways. Nat. Chem. 6, 15–21 (2014).