Environmentalism: A New Religion?

The definition of dogma is as follows: prescribed doctrine proclaimed as unquestioningly true by a particular group. Another definition of dogma is also a settled or established opinion, belief, or principle. This word is often directly associated with religion. Christian dogma asserts the centrality of Christ as God and that redemption is found only in Him.

She is fed useless information to make useless points given to her by her useless parents.

Buddhist dogma states that real bliss is found in nirvana or nothing so suffering must be paid off through karmic debt. Islamic dogma asserts that God is one and true heaven is found in following the five tenets of Quranic faith established by Muhammed. Any follower of any faith system has their figures and ideas and it can be clear that the religion Climate Change-ism found their new priestess in Greta Thunberg.

Climate Change tenents

The idea about “Climate Change” as a religion is rather simple. It underscores a few main doctrinal points.

Climate change is real and a very apocalyptic issue.

Anything man has done in the last century has a direct result of negative shifts in “climate”.

In order to halt this coming apocalypse, man must redirect efforts through science and enact mass social change to quell this impending man-made doom of the Earth.

Within these basic tenents, are a variety of denominations, just like many religious faiths. One finds sects in the examples of Sunni and Shi’ite Muslims or the Catholic-Protestant split. Even in Protestantism there are a variety of denominations. In Hinduism for example, there are followers of every deity that the Hinduism faith promotes.

Within Climate-changeism, the denominations include the Science Consensus-ites where people state that by authority of the climate scientists Catastrophic Climate Change does exist and must be thwarted. There is also the Vegan denomination that states that due to mass man-made farming practices (increasing emissions from bovine production and chicken production), that ridding the world of meat is the answer to halt climate change.

You also have a very dangerous denominational group in the Social-Changerites. These folks want nothing more than to impose mass social structures that overturn our way of life in the name of climate change and halting this doom. A prime example of such folks are Ted Turner, who in order to stop climate change wants to enact China’s old One-Child policy upon everyone.

Recently Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio Cortez proposed a $93 trillion Green New Deal. This document states that a catastrophe of “climate change” will come in 12 years. In order to stop it, mass infrastructural and economic shifts must take place, from getting rid of bovine emissions to retrofitting all buildings in the United States to utilize green energy such as solar panels. Also every American in 10 years must drive an electric vehicle, like a Nissan Leaf or a Tesla. At least according to this Green New Deal.

Figureheads of the Faith

For Christianity, it’s about Jesus Christ. For Islam, we must look at Muhammed. Buddhism stems from the teachings of Buddha and on and on. Within those faith systems are leaders of the faiths. From Jerry Falwell and the Protestant Moral Majority, to Dr. Zakir Naik, Islam’s celebrity apologist and teacher, to the Dalai Llama of Buddhism today. L. Ron Hubbard is noted for Scientology and well.

Climate Changeists have also gone through their fair share of the changing of the guards. We remember folks like Al Gore who gave the world “An Inconvenient Truth” which did not age well as much of his movie’s premise and predictions did not come true. Then Climate Changeism asked Hollywood for help. Leonardo DiCaprio answered the call of the Climate Change priesthood, and to this day he ventures forth, promoting the coming doom of climate change.

But he is a figurehead and unattainable so the Climate Change folks needed someone who seemed accessible and of the people. When the clarion-call for an on-the-ground figurehead was announced (please note the blatant sarcasm), a faint young voice of the faith rose up from out of Sweden. So emerged 16-year-old Greta Thunberg.

AOC 2.0

The problem with Greta is a multi-layered one. The first problem is she is nothing but a child. When it comes to policies, we don’t listen to children. That was quite clear when David Hogg came out as the champion for gun control and became a mouthpiece for the Left on this issue. Due to his poor ideas, bratty entitlement issues, and even more uber-poorly addressed numbers, statements, and data, he has almost faded into obscurity. Consequently his college dreams were almost dashed before his college career even began.

But the flipside is if you verbally spar with a child and come against a child, you’re the bully, which is useful to the Left. We saw this with David Hogg, who at the time was 17 when Conservatives simply questioned Hogg’s points. Hogg responded, “You shouldn’t bully a child!” but proceeds to bully others into submission.

This is exactly the second problem with Greta Thunberg. If anyone comes against her, she is immediately defended and coddled as the child she is. Another problem is her background. She comes from parentage that reeks of the Left. There are pictures of her parents wearing shirts that support the domestic terrorist group ANTIFA which means you can only conclude that Greta’s parents are using her for climate change clout.

A third concern with Greta is that she parrots. It seems that she took her cues from none other than New York’s 14th District Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Cortez drafted her Green New Deal based on the exact same findings that Greta read to Congress five days ago. Interestingly enough, the world turned their attention to this teenage girl. She was recently invited to the United Nations to speak on this very issue of “climate change”.

The final problem is that not only is she simply a pubescent teenager, barely old enough to drive, she cant vote, or buy cigarettes or alcohol. Even in Sweden, where you can’t buy booze till you are 20 and cigarettes are off-limits until you are 18. Not only is she too young and not even paying Swedish taxes, she was also diagnosed with Asperger’s Syndrome. This is noted as a developmental disorder characterised by significant difficulties in social interaction and nonverbal communication, along with restricted and repetitive patterns of behavior and interests.

So clearly the Climate Changeists have weaponized this girl’s Asperger’s syndrome as the shield they need to take cover behind when dissenting facts and data appear. Data which shows how wrong she is, then they use the “Don’t bully children” tactic but also use her Asperger’s as a tool to further negate opposition. So not only is she young, passionate… perhaps, has Leftist roots, but is also mentally handicapped. It makes her the ultimate weapon to silence Climate change agnostics, atheists and deniers.

Bad Ideas are Bad, Regardless of Age

It’s been said that bad ideas should never be generalized, but when bad ideas are bad ideas, why not? In terms of this whole climate change thing, it’s a ruse to cause mass social engineering, and the Left are using kids to do so. There were Climate Strike events occurring over the course of the past week, with kids skipping school to march and protest for “climate change”.

Greta was just one of the many who did so, as she skipped school in Sweden in order to protest for climate change. This happened because of mommy and daddy’s enabling tendencies being governed by their Leftist ideologies. Much like bad authoritarian ideas, the Climate Changers use poor data as well as the teary-eyed, impassioned, and vocal inflections of children to push their agenda.

Ideas With Identity Crises

It’s not like Climate change hasn’t gone through its own identity crisis. First it went from Global Cooling to Global Warming, then when global data showed that Global Warming was not occurring, with record cold temps ranging all across the world, “scientists” decided to use Climate Change.

But it’s really not at all how it’s cracked up to be, as there are plenty of “what ifs” about the real climate. When people talk about “scientific consensus,” it should be understood that it is not science but politics. It is noted that scientific conclusions do not come from consensus but from repetition of theorizing and testing. The “Scientific Method” is how science operates, which means consensus is not what we should look at, especially when we are attempting to determine the concept of “climate change.”

Besides, a little warming never hurt anyone. People living in seasonal climates, once the first signs of snow falls, book-it if they can for warmer temps. Who doesn’t love a great tan? Obviously it is being a little facetious to say this without looking at the nuances to the notions of climate change.

Many are saying that climate change is possible, but it is not as catastrophic as claimed. Certainly the data and numbers are showing that it isn’t very likely. More information is needed to fully understand it, but it’s not a 12 year extinction worry. Or at least it should not be considered a 12 year worry.

Greta Thunberg: Final Thought

In terms of Greta Thunberg, we should all feel sorry for her. She seems to be a mentally handicapped little girl who does not know any better. She is fed useless information to make useless points given to her by her useless parents. They are in turn probably fed this same useless information. Now the Left have weaponized this poor defenseless child to make impassioned talking points to international leaders on a dubious topic.

Climate change is a topic that needs more data in order to make concrete policies, and there just isn’t enough. The numbers don’t exist that dictate the need to make vast social changes, despite what AOC or even Greta assert. It is literally the saddest and most anger-inducing thing to see that the Left will use even Asperger’s kids to push their social engineering agenda.