Snorri and the Jews

Richard Cole, University of Notre Dame

Abstract: This essay considers the mythological writing of Snorri Sturluson (d. 1241) in its most temporally proximal comparative context: the intellectual culture of thirteenth century Christian Europe, specifically one particular area of the High Medieval imagination: Christian narratives about Jews. Particular attention is paid to Snorri’s use of anti-Jewish typology in his depiction of Loki and the Muspellssynir “The Sons of Muspell” (the agents of the apocalypse who break loose at the end of the world). The essay argues that Snorri’s configuration of Loki’s status amongst the Æsir might well have been drawn from contemporary thinking about the status of the Jew amongst Christians: both were considered outsiders, whose presence was tolerated because they were thought to have special abilities, even while they were widely held to be untrustworthy and deleterious to society. Loki’s apocalyptic comrades, the Muspellssynir, obviously originate in the eddic poem Vǫluspá, but I argue that Snorri’s account of them is strongly colored by the medieval motif of the “Red Jews”, menacing Jewish warriors who would break out of their subterranean tomb during the Last Days and ride forth into Christendom with warlike intent.

1] For medieval Scandinavians, it was a religion that belonged to the past. Perhaps it had once offered spiritual truths, but that was before the coming of Christianity, a belief system which had swept it aside and utterly superseded the old ways. People had believed in it only because Christ had not yet come to them. That, in itself, was blameless, but once the Good News had been spread, only the most stubborn and malevolent mind would refuse to convert to the one true faith. Nonetheless, it had left behind a precious trove of worthy narratives, tales of heroic deeds, and beautiful poetry. A good medieval Christian could certainly appreciate that, but he ought to feel nothing but disdain for any remaining adherents of this backwards creed. In the literature of the thirteenth century, its followers were frequently depicted as witches, troublemakers, and ne’er-do-wells; relics of a bygone age, waiting either for conversion or the righteous violence of the pious. These are perceptions reasonably attached to paganism, as it would have been understood by thirteenth-century intellectuals such as Snorri Sturluson. In this study, however, we will consider the valence of such attitudes to Judaism, the “superseded” religion upon whose abjection the foundations of medieval Christian identity were built.

2] Hostility towards Jews was an unpleasant and recurrent feature of thirteenth-century European life. The continent’s Jewish population, numbering perhaps some 450,000 (Baron 2007: 389), were subjected to rhetorical attacks by Christian preachers, repressive laws, and occasional outbreaks of violence. To frame this chronology of persecution within the life and times of Snorri Sturluson, we might begin by noting that Snorra Edda was written just a few years after the ruling of the Fourth Lateran Council in 1215. This edict included the infamous proclamation that Jews and Muslims “utriusque sexus in omni christianorum provincia et omni tempore qualitate habitus publice ab aliis populis distinguantur” (Decreta p. 266) (of both sexes in all Christian provinces and at all times shall be differentiated from other peoples in the public’s eyes by the manner of their dress). The ruling ultimately led to the enforced wearing of yellow badges or hats in many countries. As I have pointed out previously (Cole 2014: 239), Snorri’s lifetime saw blood libel accusations and massacres against the Jews in Bristol, Bury St. Edmonds, Fulda, London, Oxford, Winchester and York. By the time Snorri died in 1241, England had been driven into disorder by anti-Jewish pogroms following the coronation of Richard the Lionheart in 1189; crusading mobs had slain over 2,500 Jews in northern France; and Pope Gregory IX had put the Talmud on trial in Paris (Mentgen 2005: 155; Yuval 1998: 113–16).

3] My aim in this paper, then, is to situate Snorri in what is arguably his most proximal comparative context: that of intellectual culture in the thirteenth century. Specifically, I will focus on the meditations on Judaism, and often anti-Judaism and anti-Semitism, which pervaded that culture. During this period serious thinkers could hardly avoid engagement with the questions prompted by the ongoing interaction between Christianity and Judaism. Even if they only treated the topic tangentially, the place of the Jews as characters in the Gospels, popular accusations of Jewish perfidy, the pervasive typological associations of “the Jew” in Christian exegesis, and awareness of Christianity’s historical beginnings as a Jewish sect meant that most of the important writers of the thirteenth century made use of the Jewish topos. We might cite any number of examples here: Albertus Magnus (fl. 1245), William of Auvergne, (fl. 1228) and Robert Grosseteste (fl. 1220s) are all demonstrative of this trend (Liebeschutz 2007a: 591, 2007b: 64; on Grosseteste, his anti-Judaism and his problematic Hebraism, see McEvoy 2000: 120–32; Friedman 1934; cf. Roth 1951: 121, 126–27).

4] Not only the world of the Christian religion, but also the ancient world is included in Dante’s figural system; the Roman empire of Augustus is for Dante a figure of God’s eternal empire, and the prominent part Virgil plays in Dante’s work is based on this assumption. Dante is not the first to subject all the material of human history to the figural conception [i.e. typological reading]; biblical history, Jewish and Christian, came to be seen as universal human history, and all pagan historical material had to be inserted and adapted to this framework. (Auerbach 1952: 6) Snorra Edda obviously does not feature any Jewish characters proper, but, to employ a distinction coined by Jeffrey Jerome Cohen in his study of Margery Kempe (Cohen 2006, 2003: 185), there are several figures who are “Jew-ish”. That is to say, they are not intended to be direct comments upon the Jews or their religion, but they do freely make use of the potent typological armory of anti-Judaism. I use the word “typology” here in a sense that encompasses both its literary and exegetical meanings. The most obvious typological project in Christian narrative is the foreshadowing of Christ projected back into the Old Testament, an endeavour that began with the authors of the New Testament and which was enthusiastically continued by the church. Romans 5: 14 is an early example, and the one that gives us the word “type”: “Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam’s transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come” (Koiné: τύπος τοῦ μέλλοντος; Vulgate: forma futuri). Importantly, the business of figurative interpretation was also applied to non-Biblical texts and concepts. As Eric Auerbach put it concerning the case of Dante Alighieri’s (d. 1321) Divina Commedia:Typology in this sense becomes the pursuit of what St. Augustine called “obscura quaedam figura rerum” (the obscured figure of the thing) (Enarrationes col. 1788). For the typologically-minded reader, all narrative elements can be aligned with a predictive type, drawn from the rich dramatis personae of Christian tradition. The identity of this type will then serve as a predictor for the qualities and behaviors of the character to whom it has been appended. For instance, the Roman Empire is aligned with the Kingdom of Heaven, and therefore becomes a state charged with safeguarding spiritual perfection. Rahab becomes aligned with Ecclesia (Auerbach 1952: 3–4), and thus the scarlet rope she hangs from her window becomes a symbol of Christ’s blood: the sacrifice that saves Ecclesia just as the rope saves the harlot of Jericho. For the purposes of this study, we will focus on the manipulation of one type, namely the Jew(s) as perceived by thirteenth-century Christendom, and its potential influence upon Snorri Sturluson’s Edda, a literary product of that age. Snorri borrows from a given tradition where its imagery inspires or the typological allusion is particularly striking, but it should be stressed that I do not believe he was dealing in allegory per se. This is especially true in the case of Snorri’s use of the anti-Jewish tradition. Snorri did not intend to enter into anti-Jewish polemic, much as the more astute in his audience might have drawn that inference. Rather, amongst a myriad of other, more innocent influences, he was inspired by contemporary ideas about Jews and Judaism, and he then deployed those ideas, liberated from their original frame of reference, in the fantasy world of his Edda.

Praise for the Jews in the Codex Wormianus

Enn sem nofnín fiǫlguðuz. þa tyndiz með þui sanleikrinn. Ok af fyrstu uillu þa blotaði huerr maðr epterkomandí sinn formeistara dyr eða fugla loptin ok himintunglín ok ymisliga dauðlega lutí þar til er þessi uilla gekk um allan heím ok sua uandlegha tyndu þeir sannleiknum at æingi uissi skapara sinn. utan þeir æínir menn sem toluðu ebreska tungu þa sem gekk firi stǫpul smíðina (Wormianus p. 3) (And as the names [for God] multiplied, the true one was lost. And from the initial heresy every man and his descendants worshipped as their master animals or birds, the sky and the heavenly bodies and various inanimate objects until this heresy went all around the world, and so they habitually lost the truth, so that no-one knew his Creator, except for those men who had spoken the Hebrew language preceding the construction of the tower [of Babel]) While there are no Jewish personalities in the Edda, the Jews as a collective do make an explicit appearance in one particular recension, namely the Codex Wormianus from the middle of the fourteenth century. There, in the prologue, we find the following elaboration on the device of euhemerism:

Coming from an interpolation found solely in the Codex Wormianus, this episode is surely “Eddic” even if it probably is not “Snorric”. Nonetheless, it is enlightening for our understanding of (one particular) Edda’s connections to the Christian conception of the Jews. There is a reminder here of the antiquity of Judaism, and implicit therein is a nod to St. Augustine’s paradigm of “Jew as Witness” (Cohen 1999: 23–65). That is to say, this apparently casual remark stresses to the reader that the Jews had been the guardians of God’s law even while Scandinavians and the other gentile nations had been distracted into worshipping “inanimate objects” (dauðligar hlutir). There is almost a tone of esteem for Jews in the narrative voice, versus a mocking admonishment towards pagans. It is significant that the Jews are not referred to by any of their usual names in Old Norse, e.g. gyðingr or júði. The somewhat oblique appellation of “men who had spoken the Hebrew language” seems to anticipate any negative connotations which might have accompanied the word “Jew”. The separation of the Jews from their language was a common psychological mechanism in medieval Christianity which accommodated anti-Judaism with reverence for one of the languages of scripture. Christian Hebraists who revered the Hebrew language were still capable of anti-Jewish moments, e.g., St. Jerome, who attacked Jewish ritual clothing (Signer 2004: esp. 26; Itzkowitz 2007: 563–72). We can observe this “doublethink” elsewhere in Old Norse literature. For example, in the Messuskýringar (commentaries on the symbolism of liturgy) we find the statement: “Því er á inu vinstra horni alltaris miðhlutr messu sunginn, at nú standa aðrar þjóðir undir trú. Enn þeir eru nú mjǫk útan brautar gyðingarnir” (pp. 47–48, my standardization) (This is why the Mass is sung on the left side of the altar, so that other nations might submit to faith. But those Jews are now strayed far from the path). This is in no way at odds with the commentator’s previous joyous assertion that: “ina æðztu tungu er ebreska” (pp. 45–46) (the highest language is Hebrew). That being said, there is no reason to suppose that the author was attempting such anti-Jewish intellectual gymnastics in the prologue of the Codex Wormianus. It might be an aside, but his intent is clear. To summarize it colloquially: “you may not like the Jews, but they were a great deal closer to God than we were, back when we were worshipping Óðinn, rocks, puddles or who-knows-what-other-dauðligar-hlutir”. The Codex Wormianus thus attests an Edda tempered with a degree of warmth towards Jews.

Loki the Jew?

Snorri himself, as opposed to the Wormianus scribe, tends to borrow from the more dramatic, hostile perception of Jews. The example of Snorri’s putative anti-Judiasm that has probably received the most attention concerns the role of Christian typology in Snorri’s account of Baldr’s death and abortive resurrection. It is worth noting as an aside that elsewhere scholars have also investigated parallels and perhaps even borrowings from medieval Jewish literature in Snorra Edda (see Bugge 1881–1898: 45; Turville–Petre 1964: 119; O’Donoghue 2005: 90–91; Cole 2014), although space does not allow for further discussion of this trend here. Baldr’s Christ-like credentials are well known, which begs the question: which character in Snorri’s narrative then represents the people whom medieval Christians widely saw as Christ’s killers, the Jews? Noting the long-standing characterization of “Synagoga” as blind, Arthur Mosher proposed that Hǫðr must have been intended to refer to the Jews, with Loki, as the orchestrating power, acting as a cipher for Satan (Mosher 1983: 313–14). Mosher’s overtly Christological interpretation of this episode has not been universally accepted (e.g., Liberman 2004: 24–25). His hypothesis can perhaps be modified and enhanced with some concomitant examples of the tropes he discusses. To my knowledge, Jews are described as blind five times in the surviving Old Norse corpus, including one reference in the Old Icelandic Homily Book (Maríu saga pp. 890–93, 963–65; HMS 1 pp. 302–08, 308–11; Homiliubók pp. 57–58). In addition to these textual attestations, one pictorial depiction of the blind Synagoga survives from the Old Norse-speaking period on an altar panel from Kinsarvik, Norway (see Figure 1). Moreover, the Gospel motif of the Jews as unwitting instruments for Satan’s plan to kill Christ also features in Niðrstigningar saga, the Old Norse translation of the apocryphal Gospel of Nichodemus, which Christopher Abram (2006: 13, 2011: 220) has argued may have inspired Snorri elsewhere in the Edda, specifically his account of Hermóðr’s Helreið (ride to Hel). In Niðrstigningar saga it is written that the Devil “ęggiat gyþing[a] lyþ fiandscapar viþ hann” (HMS 2 p. 16; cf. pp. 3–4, 19) (incited the Jewish nation to enmity against Him).



Figure 1. Blind Synagoga with St. Paul, Antependium from Kinsarvik Church, Norway, c. 1200. Image courtesy of Norsk Folkemuseum. Interestingly, many of the published images of this altar frontal are cropped in such a way as to remove her. Figure 1. Blind Synagoga with St. Paul, Antependium from Kinsarvik Church, Norway, c. 1200. Image courtesy of Norsk Folkemuseum. Interestingly, many of the published images of this altar frontal are cropped in such a way as to remove her.

In [Gregory the Great’s (590–604)] eighth homily on the Gospels, [… ] [he] specifies that not quite everything acknowledged Christ’s divinity by their sorrow at his death. Gregory enumerates the ways in which the different elements of creation—including the rocks, sea and sun—perceived Christ as Lord […] But, continues Gregory, the Jews who turned away from Christ were harder hearted even than rocks, refusing “to acknowledge him whom […] the elements proclaimed to be God either by their signs or by being broken” […] When combined with the relatively well-known idea that all creation wept at Christ’s death, Gregory’s homily may lead us to suspect that at some point in the transmission of the Baldr myth it has been susceptible to Christian influence. Gregory’s homilies were known in Iceland and translated into Old Norse, and they provided an important source for the types of sermon that Snorri might have heard preached each Sunday in church. (Abram 2011: 219–20) I therefore agree that it is not unreasonable to adduce that Snorri would have been familiar with the trope. But Mosher’s argument is open to criticism on two fronts. Firstly, it implies that Snorra Edda is a sort of roman à clef, where each character is a façade for one discrete referent. As I have elsewhere argued concerning the similarity between Surtr, the Døkkálfar, and blámenn (Cole 2015b), such narrow literalism is not how Snorri’s mind worked. Behind a single character may lie a genealogy including any number of influences—”authentically” pagan or otherwise—and a single influence may manifest itself in many different characters simultaneously. Secondly, Mosher does not draw on the most tangible and credible source of typology for Snorri’s writing, namely the kind of preaching material now best exemplified by the Old Icelandic Homily Book. Abram, who also argues for the presence of incognito Jews in Snorri’s work, says this on the matter:

En oss er þeckianda i ꜵllom tócnom þeim er sýnd ero bǽþe at bornom drótne oc deyianda. hve mikil illzca hever veret i hiortom neqverra gyþinga er hvártke keɴdosc þeir viþ gvþ fyr spár ne fyr iarteiner. þuiat allar hofoþskepnor vǫ́ttoþo komet hafa scapera siɴ. J þui keɴdo himnarner guþ. er þeir sendio stiornona. Hafet keɴde hann. þuiat þat spratt eige vndan fótom hans þa er hann geck yver þat. Jorþen kende hann. þuiat hon skalf at honom deyianda. Sólen kende hann. þuiat hon gerþe eigi skína. Steínar keɴdo hann. þuiat þeir sprungo a tíþ daúþa hans. Helvíte kende hann. þuiat þat varþ aftr at selia þa dauþa meɴ es þat helt áþr. En þóat allar hofoþskepnor váttaþe hann guþ vera. þa villdo ǫllvngis eige hiorto ớtrúra gyþinga trúa hann guþ vera. oc harþare steinom villdo þau eige kliúfasc til iþronar. oc vilia eige iáta þeim er allar skepnor skilia guþ vera. (Homilíubók p. 58, my emphasis) (It is known to us in all wonders, those which were seen both at the Lord’s birth and death, how much evil has been in the hearts of some Jews, who neither acknowledge God for prophecies nor for miracles. Because all the elements affirmed that their creator had come. The heavens acknowledged God, for they sent the stars. The sea acknowledged Him, because it did not part under his feet when he walked over it. The earth acknowledged Him, because it shook upon his death. The sun acknowledged Him, because it did not shine. The stones acknowledged Him, because they cracked at the time of His death. Hell acknowledged Him, because it came again to deliver back those dead men, whom previously it held. But even though all of the elements attested that He was God, then the hearts of the faithless Jews would by no means believe Him to be God, and harder than stones they would not be cracked for [their] repentance, and would not yield to Him, whom all of creation understands to be God.) Abram’s argument is fortified when we confirm that the relevant excerpt from the Gregorian homily he describes is indeed attested in an Old Icelandic sermon on the Apparition of Christ:

Því næst sendu Æsir um allan heim ørindreka at biðja at Baldr væri grátinn ór Helju. En allir gerðu þat, menninir ok kykvendin ok jǫrðin ok steinarnir ok tré ok allr málmr, svá sem þú munt sét hafa at þessir hlutir gráta þá er þeir koma ór frosti ok í hita. Þá er sendimenn fóru heim ok hǫfðu vel rekit sín eyrindi, finna þeir í helli nokkvorum hvar gýgr sat. Hon nefndisk Þǫkk. Þeir biðja hana gráta Baldr ór Helju. Hon segir: “Þǫkk mun gráta / þurrum tárum / Baldrs bálfarar. / Kyks né dauðs / nautka ek karls sonar: / haldi Hel því er hefir”. En þess geta menn at þar hafi verit Loki Laufeyjarson er flest hefir illt gert með Ásum. (Gylfaginning pp. 47–48, my emphasis) (The next thing that happened, the Æsir sent word around the whole world, asking for Baldr to be wept out of Hel. And everyone did so, humans and animals and the earth and the stones and trees and every kind of metalwork, as you will have seen that these things weep when they are brought out of the cold and into the warm. Then when the messengers came home and had almost completed their task, they find a giantess sitting in a certain cave. She was called Þǫkk. They ask her to weep for Baldr, to get him out of Hel. She says: “Þǫkk will cry / dry tears / at Baldr’s funeral. / Living nor dead, /I did not delight in the old man’s son [Baldr] / May Hel keep what she has.” But most people think this was really Loki, son of Laufey, who committed the most evil against the Æsir.) Considered alongside Snorri’s own words, the influence from this scene on the Edda becomes quite transparent:

Besides the allusion to Gregory’s homily, there are other factors in Snorri’s account contributing to Loki’s Jew-ishness. There appears to be a subtle irony in the choice of Loki’s alter ego. Þǫkk means “thanks” or “gratefulness”. Richard Cleasby and Guðbrandur Vigfusson assert that this is a coincidence, and that Þǫkk’s name must originally have a different root (Cleasby and Vigfusson 1874: 756). But for typological purposes, this double meaning is quite appropriate. After all, from a medieval Christian perspective, it was gratefulness that was sorely lacking when Christ revealed himself to the Jews. As Christians told the history of the early Church, the Jews had been given a great gift, yet they had rejected it. In the end, it was the gentiles who would show appreciation, and so form the Church. As the Old Icelandic Homily Book says: “iorsala lýþr oc gyþingar georþesc vinstre handar meɴ. þat ero recningar fyr ótrú sína. en hann valþc epter písl sóma heógre handar meɴ sér af heiþnom monnom ór norþre” (Homilíubók p. 37) (the people of Jerusalem and the Jews were made left-hand-men [i.e. enemies], that is a sign of their faithlessness, and after his crucifixion he chose for the honor of his right-hand-men heathen peoples from the North).

5] 6] […] et justæ pœnæ inflictio est ut terram laboriose operetur, quæ etsi ex operatione illius populi fructificet, non tamen fert illi fructus suos, sed principibus sub quibus captivatur. (Epistolae p. 35) ([…] it is the infliction of a just punishment that this people labour hard at tilling ground that, although it produces abundantly from their efforts, nevertheless bears its fruits not for them, but for the princes under whom they are held captive (Letters pp. 67–68)) Furthermore, there is something very Jew-ish in Loki’s function amongst the Æsir. Loki in Ásgarðr and the Jew in Western Christendom are both positions predicated on the notion of “being in service”. From Augustine describing the Jews as book-carrying servants for Christian students, to Emperor Frederick II’s designation of Jews as servi camere nostre “servants of our chamber”, to the possessive servitude exhibited in the Anglo-Norman Judei Nostri, the doctrine of the “Jew in Christian Service” permeated medieval thinking about Jews (Rowe 2004: 16; Krummel 2011: 28–36; Abulafia 2011). But in both cases, the servant is held in contempt, perceived as antisocial and disloyal. Like the Jew amongst Christians, Loki is an ethnic Other, because his father Fárbauti belongs to the race of the jǫtnar (giants). And in both cases, the cunning, magic-wielding outsider is tolerated only because of his unique qualities. If Loki only insulted and tricked the gods, and did not at all assist them when they fell into unfortunate predicaments, his presence in Ásgarðr would surely not be sustained. The parallel also extends perfectly to the way “the Jew” and Loki are treated. Both are righteously abused for the profit of their masters. Robert Grosseteste, a contemporary of Snorri, succinctly articulated the consensus regarding the status of the Jew within Christendom:This is a metaphor which could just as well be applied to Loki under the Æsir.

The sons of Muspell and the Red Jews: Two harbingers of the apocalypse

“Nú var Loki tekinn griðalauss ok farit með hann í helli nokkvorn. Þá tóku þeir þrjár hellur ok settu á egg ok lustu rauf á hellunni hverri. Þá váru teknir synir Loka Váli ok Nari eða Narfi. Brugðu Æsir Vála í vargs líki ok reif hann í sundr Narfa bróður sinn. Þá tóku Æsir þarma hans ok bundu Loka með yfir þá þrjá steina - einn undir herðum annarr undir lendum, þriði undir knésfótum - ok urðu þau bǫnd at járni. Þá tók Skaði eitrorm ok festi upp yfir hann svá at eitrit skyldi drjúpa ór orminum í andlit honum. En Sigyn kona hans stendr hjá honum ok heldr mundlaugu undir eitrdropa. En þá er full er mundlaugin þá gengr hon ok slær út eitrinu, en meðan drýpr eitrit í andlit honum. Þá kippisk hann svá hart við at jǫrð ǫll skelfr. Þat kallið þér landskjálpta. Þar liggr hann í bǫndum til ragnarøkrs”. (Gylfaginning p. 49) (“Now, without mercy, Loki was taken and brought to a certain cave. Then they took three slabs and turned them on their edges and drilled a hole in each. Then the sons of Loki were taken, Váli and Nari or Narfi. The Æsir transformed Váli into the shape of a wolf and he tore his brother Narfi to shreds. Then the Æsir took his entrails and bound Loki with them over the three stones—one under his shoulders, the second under his hips, the third under his knees, and they turned those bonds into iron. Then Skaði took a poisonous serpent and secured it above him so that the poison would drip out of its mouth onto his face. And Sigyn, his wife, stands by him and holds a cup under the dripping poison. But when the cup is full then she goes and throws the poison away, and in the meantime the poison drips onto his face. Then he thrashes so hard that the whole earth shakes. That’s what you call an earthquake. He lies there in his bonds until Ragnarøkr”.) 7] Í þessum gný klofnar himinninn ok ríða þaðan Muspells synir. Surtr ríðr fyrst ok fyrir honum ok eptir bæði eldr brennanndi. Sverð hans er gott mjǫk. Af því skínn bjartara en af sólu. En er þeir ríða Bifrǫst þá brotnar hon sem fyrr er sagt. Muspells megir sœkja fram á þann vǫll er Vígríðr heitir. Þar kemr ok þá Fenrisúlfr ok Miðgarðsormr. Þar er ok þá Loki kominn ok Hrymr ok með honum allir hrímþursar, en Loka fylgja allir Heljar sinnar. En Muspells synir hafa einir sér fylking; er sú bjǫrt mjǫk. (Gylfaginning p. 50) 8] (In this clamor, the sky splits in two and the sons of Muspell ride forth. Surtr rides out first, before and after him there is burning fire. His sword is very great. The shine from it is brighter than the sun. And as they ride on Bifrǫst, then it breaks as previously said. The troops of Muspell head forth to the field which is called Vígríðr. Fenrisúlfr and Miðgarðsormr also arrive. Loki has also arrived, and Hrymr, and with him all the Ice Giants, and all the champions of Hel follow Loki. And the sons of Muspell have a fylking all to themselves. It shines a great deal.) Kjóll ferr austan

koma munu Muspells

og lǫg lýðir,

en Loki stýrir.

Þar ró fíflmegir

með freka allir

Þeim er bróðir

Býleists í fǫr (Gylfaginning p. 51; cf. Poetic Edda p. 12)



(A ship journeys from the East

[the sons] of Muspell are coming

across the waves

There are the monstrous brood

with all the wolves

Those are the brothers

of Býleist, on their way) Loki’s Jew-ish credentials are further enhanced when we consider his fate at the end of the world. When the Æsir suspect his role in Baldr’s death, their vengeance is grisly in the extreme. There is a brief allusion to the fact that Loki has been bound in stanza 14 of Baldrs draumr: “er lauss Loki líðr ór bǫndom” (Poetic Edda p. 279) (when Loki gets free from his bonds). Some details are also given in the prose epilogue to Lokasenna in the Codex Regius, which corresponds quite closely to the description provided by Snorri. Snorra Edda, however, is our chief source for the details of the scene. As Hár explains to Gangleri:And when Ragnarøkr comes, this is what happens:Snorri quotes stanza 51 of Vǫluspá as his source here:

9] : Anti christus man berast i babílon hínní miclu or kẏni dan fra port kono [...] Oll tacn hans ero lẏgín. Hann man endr nya hína fornu iorsala borg. þat er íherusalem. oc lata sic þar gofga sem guð. Við honum monu gẏðingar taka fegensamlega. oc koma til hans or ollum heímí. En þeír monu snuast til tru af kenníngum enocs oc elias. Oc taka mioc sua aller harðar píníngar fyrir guðs nafne. (Elucidarius p. 84) (The Anti-Christ will be born in Greater Babylon to a woman of easy virtue from the tribe of Dan […] All his miracles are false. He will rebuild the ancient Jórsalaborg, that is to say, Jerusalem, and have himself worshipped there as God. The Jews will receive him eagerly, and they will come to him from all over the world. But they will be converted to the faith by the teachings of Enoch and Elijah. And they will receive very harsh punishments in the name of God.) But Snorri’s description of the imprisonment and counter-attack of the Muspellssynir also has much in common with another popular medieval narrative. “The Red Jews” is a motif, seeming to emanate most forcefully from German-speaking Europe in the twelfth century (e.g. Gow 1995: esp. 91-95), in which a nation of Jews are imprisoned in a remote area, often in a mountain tomb somewhere around the Caucasus. Upon their release in the build-up to the apocalypse, the Red Jews will attack Christendom, resulting in an apocalyptic bloodshed that will bring on the End of Days. There are many variants to the legend—sometimes the Red Jews are identified with Gog and Magog, sometimes the Lost Ten Tribes of Israel. Sometimes, as in The Travels of John Mandeville (c. 1350s), they will seek out the Jewish Diaspora, and act as a globally coordinated threat. Sometimes they are directly answerable to the Anti-Christ or they ride with the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse. Elsewhere, they are in league with the forces of Islam (Gow 1995). The first textual witness to a group of people actually referred to as “Red Jews” is Der Jüngere Titurel (c. 1272) but the motif is undoubtedly dependent on much earlier material from Alexander romances, going back as far as the tenth century Historia de Preliis Alexandri Magni (Gow 1995: 70–76). Precursor groups to the Red Jews appear in St. Jerome’s Commentariorum in Hiezechielem (c. 380), Lamprecht’s Alexander (c. 1130), and the Historia Scholastica (1160s) amongst other Latin and German sources (see Gow 1995: 300–1, 305–6, 308). The Red Jews proper are not attested in the West Norse corpus, although an antecedent tradition does appear in the Old Norse Elucidarius (c. 1200)

There is no suggestion here that the Jews have been contained, or that they will embark on a premeditated annihilation of Christendom. Crucially, though, there is the notion that the Jews will unite all over the world, and that they will act in a coordinated fashion in the service of the Anti-Christ until Enoch and Elijah show them the errors of their ways. These “proto-Red Jews” are a noteworthy example of the kind of thinking about Jews that was circulating in the Old Norse world. As shall be seen, it appears that Snorri had access to a more mature version of the Red Jews legend, which he then allowed to color his perception (or depiction) of the Muspellssynir: e.g., both Snorri’s “sons of Muspell” and the Red Jews are held underground until the end of times, both ride on horseback, etc. If we are in search of a strain of the Red Jews tradition which is more analogous to the apocalyptic agents of Snorra Edda, we must look beyond Icelandic sources.

10] [Old Swedish]

han foor thẚdhan ower sitiam

ỏster borter ij wẚrlina fram

enkte land laa thiit wt mere

ther man wiste aff sighia flere

han fan ther folk wẚrre ẚn trull

thʒ hafdhe tho rẚt mẚnniskio hull

rẚdhelikith ok mykith oreent

them gat ẚngin opa seet

the hafdho syyn ẚ swa grym

at ẚnghin thordhe se a them

thʒ lifdhe alt widh trulla sidh

ẚngin mẚnniskia fik ther fridh

thʒ aat folk mʒ huld ok krop

inbyrdhis hwart annath op

ok alla handa creatwr

hẚst ok wargh foghil ok diwr

hwath som fỏdhis a iordh ẚller wẚdher

thʒ ẚta the alt saman mẚdher

…..........................................

the plẚgha enkte thera iordha

the ẚtar them op a thera bordhe

hwath man kan hẚlʒt lifwande nẚmpna

…..........................................

orena gerninga margha handa

sa alexander aff them ganga

ther lofflika ẚra skriffwa

thʒ ẚr alt ont thʒ the drifwa

Rỏdhe iudha mon thʒ heta

swa finder han ẚn hwa them wil leta

tha alexander hafdhe thetta seet

badhe hỏrt ok widha leet

at thetta folk dreff tholik last

han thẚnkte ij sinom hoghe rast

vtan thetta folk forgaar

al wẚrlin ẚpter dỏme faar

ok smittas ij tholik gerning snỏdh

all wẚrlin hafwer thẚs stora nỏdh

om thʒ skal ganga sin fram gang

ẚpter thera sidh tha smittas mang

ok lifwa ij thera ẚpter dỏme

thʒ ware bẚtra at man them gỏme

Alexander fan et ful got raadh

thʒ folkith han saman drifwa badh

ij en flok badhe mẚn ok qwinna

swa then mera som then minnda

swa at enkte ater bleff

nor ij wẚrlina alla them dreff

swa langan wẚgh rẚt ij nor

at thiit ẚngin fara thỏr

Thʒ war alexanders idhelik bỏn

til gudh som allom gifwer lỏn

at wẚrlin skulle ekke smittas

aff tholikt lifwerne ekke hittas

…..........................................

han badh swa lẚnge gudh hỏrdhe han

gudh giordhe vnder the ẚra san

ey stort fore alexanders saka

vtan mẚnniskio helso til maka

han bỏdh tvem berghom the standa ẚn

ganga til saman badhin ij sẚn

the waro hỏgh ok mykith lang

gingo saman vtan alt bang

…..........................................

ther ẚr stort rwm innan til

som et ganʒt land iak thʒ sighia wil

…..........................................

bẚrghin ẚra alt kringom brant

som annar mwr thʒ ẚr sẚnt

the ẚra som andre mwrwẚggia hỏghia

ther kan ẚngin op fore ỏghia

the rỏdha iudha ẚra ther inne

badhe flere ok swa minne (Konung Alexander 130–33)



[English]

(He goes from there over Scythia.

Away, far to the East of the world.

There was no land out there any more

that anyone knew of. Many say

there he found a people worse than

trolls

Although they had human skin

angry and most unclean

No one could bear to look upon them

They had such an ugly appearance

that no one dared to look upon them

they all lived in the manner of trolls.

No human there could find any peace.

They ate people with skin and body

including each other

and all kinds of creatures,

horses and wolves, birds and beasts,

whatever lives on earth or sea,

they ate it all in the same way

…..........................................

they do not tend to their land.

On their tables, they eat up

whatever living thing you can name.

The committing of many impure deeds [spells?]

Alexander saw them do.

There, it is written in law

that everything they do is evil.

They are called “Red Jews”

so he seeks them, and wants to see them.

When Alexander had seen that,

both heard it and clearly observed,

that this people behaved in such a way

he thinks in his booming voice

all the world will be judged

unless this people are destroyed

and will be smote by such sordid actions.

The whole world is in great need.

If things were to go their own way

according to their custom many would be smitten

and live ever after in their power.

It would be better if one could hide them away

Alexander had a great idea.

He had that people rounded up

in one group, both men and women,

the short and the tall,

so that not one was left behind at all.

He had them driven north in the world,

such a long way north,

that no one would dare to go there.

It was Alexander’s pious prayer

to God who rewards all

that the world would not be smitten

and never encounter such a way of life

…..........................................

he prayed so long that God heard him.

God did it, it’s true,

not for Alexander’s sake alone

but for the good of all humankind.

He commanded two mountains—they still stand—

to come together as one.

They were tall and very long.

They went together without any noise

…..........................................

Inside there is a lot of space

like a huge country, I should say

…..........................................

the mountains are steep all around

like another wall, it’s true.

They are like other tall walls.

No one can climb it.

The Red Jews are in there,

both short and tall.) As the continental material concerning the Red Jews is so diverse, any decision over which particular source to quote as exemplary will be more or less arbitrary. Therefore, I have opted to compare Snorri’s Muspellssynir with the tradition as it appears in Old Swedish. Doubtless, there can be no suggestion of direct transmission between the two, as the Swedish Konung Alexander (c. 1380) is over a century younger than Snorra Edda. However, the particular Latin text of which it is substantially a translation, the Historia de Preliis Alexandri Magni, dates from the tenth century. The Old Swedish account thus has the advantage of having a strong connection to one of the oldest known ancestors of the Red Jews. Furthermore, owing to the linguistic affinity between Old Swedish and Old Norse it can also give us a hint at what a rendering of the Red Jews tale might have looked like in Snorri’s own language—not that there necessarily was a written vernacular version. The tale could well have been told by foreign guests or cosmopolitan scholars at the Norwegian court of King Hákon Hákonarson, for example. We know that people in that very circle were discussing—and evaluating the plausibility of—another Orientalist fantasy, namely the Letter of Prester John. Written at the court of King Hákon for the king-in-waiting, Magnús Hákonarson, Konungs skuggsjá (c. 1250s) refers to “þá bok er gior var a indija landi [...] þar sie margt vndarliga j sagt” (Konungs skuggsiá p. 13; see also Larrington 2004: 96–97) (that book which was made in India […] in which many wondrous things are said). Indeed, it ought to be noted that some versions of the Letter actually contained references to the Red Jews (Gow 1995: 307, 309–10). Obviously we are in the realm of the deeply speculative here, but it does not seem unthinkable that a discussion similar to the one hinted at in Konungs skuggsjá might also have taken place concerning the Red Jews.

There are several striking affinities between the coming of the Muspellssynir according to Snorri and the Red Jews according to the Alexander romances. Both are imprisoned underground: Loki in a cave, the Red Jews in the mountains. Both engage in cannibalism. The Red Jews “aat folk mʒ huld ok krop / inbyrdhis hwart annath op” (eat people and their flesh and blood / they’ll even munch each other up). Similarly, according to Snorri, Loki’s son Váli eats his brother, Narfi. The release of either the Red Jews or the Muspellssynir is a precursor to the apocalypse. Alexander, as a Christianized king in the medieval tradition, can pray to the one true God and prevent it from happening. Snorri’s tragically flawed pagan deities, on the other hand, must vainly await their doom. Indeed, concerning one important detail, Snorra Edda is closer to the Red Jews motif than it is to Vǫluspá. In the eddic poem, the Muspellssynir approach over water with a ship, a kjóll. But in Snorra Edda, despite the citation of the original poem, the accompanying prose clearly states that they ride on horseback towards Ásgarðr. This suggests that the image of the Muspellssynir conjured by Snorri’s mind’s eye probably resembled something like the example provided in Figure 2, rather than the nautical setting that would have been drawn from Vǫluspá alone.



Figure 2. Der Antichrist, fol. 14v (1480). Image courtesy of Die Bayerische Staatsbibliothek. Figure 2. Der Antichrist, fol. 14v (1480). Image courtesy of Die Bayerische Staatsbibliothek.

Muspellssynir in Vǫluspá Muspellsynir in Snorra Edda The Red Jews Appear at the apocalypse? Yes Yes Yes How will they arrive at the apocalypse? Sea, by boat (kjóll) By land, on horseback (at ríða), and on foot By land, on horseback, and on foot Where are they prior to the apocalypse? Muspell, more specific whereabouts unknown Underground, inside a cave Underground, inside a mountain Depicted as a military force? Uncertain, described as fíflmegir, ‘monstrous men’, perhaps intended here as ‘monstrous brood’ rather than ‘monstrous troops’. However, the point seems obscure. Yes. They march in a fylking, a medieval defensive formation. They are also referred to as the Muspells megir, ‘men of Muspell’, perhaps intended here in the sense of ‘troops of Muspell’ (but cf. fíflmegir). Frequently, as in e.g. the Gottweiger Trojanerkrieg late 1200s): “Dar ringe gantz / Ir ringe gantz / Ir helm waren hartte glantz” (Gow 1995: 193) [There under [their armor] they wore huge steel rings / their helmets had a fearful gleam] 11] If one did not know the actual context for this image (and did not know how relatively few artistic depictions there are of Old Norse myth from the Middle Ages versus, say, Christian devotional art), one might very well describe these horse-mounted warriors and their malevolent leader as the Sons of Muspell and Loki, as depicted by Snorri: “ríða þaðan Muspells synir” (the Sons of Muspell ride forth) (Gyfaginning, p. 50). Of course, it is actually a depiction of the Red Jews from Der Antichrist, fol. 14v (1480). The queen of the Amazons is also amongst the horde. A similar image can also be found in Ms. Germ 2mo 129, fol. 15v (c. 1320). Otherwise, the earliest surviving pictorial representation pertaining to the Red Jews shows the entombed Gog and Magog eating human flesh, from the Ebstorf World Map (1235). See Gow 1995: 383–390.As is so often the case with Snorri’s work, the sons of Muspell are not drawn exclusively from any one tradition. Vǫluspá clearly provided the basic structure upon which Snorri could build his own narrative of Ragnarøkr. But Snorri does seem to be permitting his ancient, pagan materials to draw color from the potent images of the high medieval cultural canon in which he was immersed. Snorri was not insulated from the intellectual climate to which he was contributing, and thus could no more avoid being influenced by the powerful typologies of anti-Judaism than he could avoid any other aspect of the medieval Christian Weltanschauung. Indeed, the emphasis on the “sons of Muspell” as a descent group based on lineage makes them feel more like a contemporary ethnic group than a venerable cosmological fixture. As if to highlight the originality of the thirteenth-century eddic hybrid he has created, it is only Snorri (and the singular example of stanza 48 in Lokasenna) who employs the name “Muspellssynir” to refer to these agents of the apocalypse. In Vǫluspá, they are elliptically named Muspells, lit. “Of Muspell”. One might rather optimistically attribute the uniqueness of Snorri’s appellation by proposing that he is the only surviving witness of a naming tradition which was already at least two centuries old by the time he wrote it down, having apparently survived in oral record from some time around Iceland’s official conversion in the year 1000 until the 1220s. More soberly, we might consider Snorri’s own era and consider if there were any group in the thought of that period whose presence was associated with the apocalypse and who were known as synir, (sons of). Readers will note the similarity between the phrases Muspells synir and Isræls synir, the term frequently used in thirteenth century works—such as Stjórn—to refer to the Jews. Both are based on the formula of geographical location + synir. They are also phonologically similar. In Snorri’s days the /els syni:r/ of Muspells synir would have made a half rhyme with the /ε:ls syni:r/ of Isræls synir. Admittedly, the proposition that there are resonances of anti-Jewish imagery in Snorra Edda may be unpalatable, but it is a crucial to considering Snorri in his comparative context. Much as scholars may employ Snorra Edda to recover details of the pagan past, it is also necessary to acknowledge Snorri’s Christian present. Thinking about the Jews was an inalienable aspect of that experience.

Works cited

Primary sources

Decreta

Conciliorum Oecumenicorum Decreta. Ed. J. Alberigo et al. Bologna: 1973.

Der Antichrist

Der Antichrist und Die fünfzehn Zeichen vor dem jüngsten Gericht. Faksimile der ersten typographischen Ausgabe eines unbekannten Straßburger Druckers, um 1480. Hamburg: 1979.

Der Göttweiger Trojanerkrieg

Pseudo-Wolfram von Eschenbach. Der Göttweiger Trojanerkrieg. Ed. Alfred Koppitz. Deutsche Texte des Mittelalters, 29. Berlin: 1926.

Elucidarius

The Old Norse Elucidarius. Ed. Evelyn Scherabon Firchow. Columbia: 1992.

Enarrationes

St. Augustine of Hippo. Enarrationes in Psalmos. Ed. J. P. Migne. Patrologia Latina, 37. Paris: 1845.

Epistolae

Robert Grossteste. Roberti Grosseteste Episcopi Quondam Lincolniensis Epistolæ. Ed. Henry Richards Luard. Rerum Britannicarum medii aevi scriptores, 25. London: 1861.

Translation

The Letters of Robert Grosseteste, Bishop of Lincoln. Transl. F. A. C. Mantello and Joseph Goering. Toronto: 2010.

Gylfaginning: see Snorra Edda

Hauksbók

Hauksbók. Udgiven efter de Arnamagnæanske håndskrifter no. 371, 544 og 675, 4o. 1. Ed. Finnur Jónsson. Copenhagen: 1892.

Heilagra Manna Søgur [= HMS]

Heilagra Manna Søgur, fortællinger og legender om hellige mænd og kvinder. 2 vols. Ed. C.R. Unger. Christiania: 1877.

Homiliu-Bók

Homiliu-Bók. Isländska Homilier efter en Handskrift från Tolfte Århundradet. Ed. Theodor Wisén. Lund: 1872.

Konung Alexander

Konung Alexander. En Medeltids Dikt från Latinet Vänd i Svenska Rim. Ed. G.E. Klemming. Stockholm: 1862.

Konungs Skuggsjá

Konungs Skuggsiá. Ed. Ludvig Holm-Olsen. Norrøne tekster, 1. Oslo: 1983.

Letters: see Epistolae

The Life and Miracles of St. William of Norwich

Thomas of Monmouth. The Life and Miracles of St. William of Norwich. Ed. and Transl. Augustus Jessopp and Montague Rhodes James. Cambridge: 1896.

Maríu saga

Mariu Saga. Legender om Jomfru Maria og hendes jertegn, efter gamle haandskrifter. Ed. C.R. Unger. Christiania: 1871.

Messuskýringar

Messuskýringar. Liturgisk Symbolik frå Den Norsk-Islandske Kyrkja i Millomalderen. Vol. 1. Ed. Oluf Kolsrud. Oslo: 1952.

Poetic Edda

Edda: Die Lieder des Codex Regius nebst verwandten Denkmälern. Vol. 1. Ed. Gustav Neckel & Hans Kuhn. Heidelberg: 1983.

Snorra Edda

Snorri Sturluson. Edda. Prologue and Gylfaginning. Ed. Anthony Faulkes. London: 1988.

Stjórn

Stjórn. Tekst etter håndskriftene. 2 vols. Ed. Reidar Astås. Norrøne tekster, 8. Oslo: 2009.

Wormianus

Edda Snorra Sturlusonar. Codex Wormianus AM 242, fol. Ed. Finnur Jónsson. Copenhagen: 1924.

Secondary sources

Abram, Christopher. 2006. “Snorri’s Invention of Hermóðr’s helreið.” In The Fantastic in Old Norse / Icelandic, Sagas and the British Isles: Preprints of the Thirteenth International Saga Conference. Ed. John McKinnell, David Ashurst, and Donata Kick. Durham. Pp. 22–31.

———. 2011. Myths of the Pagan North: The Gods of the Norsemen. London.

Abulafia, Anna Sapir. 2011. Christian-Jewish Relations, 1000–1300. Jews in the Service of Medieval Christendom. London.

Adams, Jonathan. 2013. Lessons in Contempt: Poul Ræff’s Publication in 1516 of Johannes Pfefferkorn’s The Confession of the Jews. Odense.

Auerbach, Eric. 1952. “Typological Symbolism in Medieval Literature.” Yale French Studies 9: 3–10.

Berenbaum, Michael, and Fred Skolnik, eds. 2007. Encyclopedia Judaica. 22 vols. Detroit.

Baron, Salo W. 2007. “Population.” In Berenbaum and Skolnik 2007 16: 381–400.

Bartlett, Robert. 2001. “Medieval and Modern Concepts of Race and Ethnicity.” Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 31(1): 39–56.

Bugge, Sophus. 1881–1898. Studier over de nordiske Gude- og heltesagns Oprindelse. Christiania.

Cleasby, Richard, and Gudbrand Vigfusson. 1874. An Icelandic-English Dictionary. Oxford.

Cohen, Jeffrey Jerome. 2003. Medieval Identity Machines. Minneapolis.

———. 2006. “Was Margery Kempe Jewish?” In the Middle. Blog. April 21. http://www.inthemedievalmiddle.com/2006/04/was-margery-kempe-jewish.html (accessed on March 1, 2015).

Cohen, Jeremy. 1999. Living Letters of the Law: Ideas of the Jew in Medieval Christianity. Los Angeles.

Cole, Richard. 2014. “The French Connection, or Þórr versus the Golem.” Medieval Encounters 20(3): 238–60.

———. 2015a. “Kyn / Fólk / Þjóð / Ætt: Proto-Racial Thinking and its Application to Jews in Old Norse Literature.” In Fear and Loathing in the North: Jews and Muslims in Medieval Scandinavia and the Baltic Region. Ed. Cordelia Heß and Jonathan Adams. Berlin. Pp. 239–68.

———. 2015b. “Racial Thinking in Old Norse Literature: The Case of the Blámaðr.” Saga-Book 39: 21–40.

Faulkes, Anthony. 1983. “Pagan Sympathy: Attitudes to Heathendom in the Prologue to Snorra Edda.” In Edda: A Collection of Essays. Ed. R. J. Glendinning and Haraldur Bessason. Winnipeg.

———. 1993. “The Sources of Skáldskaparmál: Snorri’s Intellectual Background.” In Snorri Sturluson: Kolloquium anlasslich der 750: Wiederkehr seines Todestages. Ed. Alois Wolf. Tübingen. Pp. 59–76.

Fidjestøl, Bjarne. 1997. “Snorri Sturluson—European Humanist and Rhetorician.” In Selected Papers. Ed. Odd Einar Haugen and Else Mundal. Transl. Peter Foote. Odense. Pp. 343–50.

Friedman, Lee M. 1934. Robert Grosseteste and the Jews. Cambridge, MA.

Gow, Andrew Colin. 1995. The Red Jews: Antisemitism in an Apocalyptic Age 1200–1600. Leiden.

Haraldur Bernharðsson. 2007. “Old Icelandic ragnarök and ragnarøkkr.” In Verba docenti: Studies in historical and Indo-European linguistics presented to Jay H. Jasanoff. Ed. Alan J. Nussbaum. Ann Arbor. Pp. 25–38.

Holm-Olsen, Ludvig, and Kjell Heggelund. 1974. Fra Runene til Norske Selskab. Vol. 1 of Norges Litteratur Historie. Oslo.

Itzkowitz, Joel B. 2007. “Jews, Indians, Phylacteries: Jerome on Matthew 23.5.” Journal of Early Christian Studies 15(4): 563–72.

Kirby, Ian. 1986. Bible Translation in Old Norse. Geneva.

Krummel, Miriamne Ara. 2011. Crafting Jewishness in Medieval England. Legally Absent, Virtually Present. New York.

Larrington, Carolyne. 2004. “‘Undruðusk þá, sem fyrir var’: Wonder, Vínland and Medieval Travel Narratives.” Mediaeval Scandinavia 14: 91–114.

Liberman, Anatoly. 2004. “Some Controversial Aspects of the Myth of Baldr.” Alvíssmál 11: 17–54.

Liebeschutz, Hans. 2007a. “Albertus Magnus.” In Berenbaum and Skolnik 2007 1: 591.

———. 2007b. “William of Auvergne.” In Berenbaum and Skolnik 2007 21: 64.

McEvoy, James. 2000. Robert Grosseteste. Oxford.

Mentgen, Gerd. 2005. “Crusades.” In vol. 1 of Antisemitism: A Historical Encyclopedia of Prejudice and Persecution. Ed. Richard S. Levy. Oxford. Pp. 152–55.

Mitchell, Stephen A. 1996. “The Middle Ages.” In A History of Swedish Literature. Ed. Lars G. Warme. Lincoln, NE. Pp. 1–57.

Moore, R.I. 2006. The Formation of a Persecuting Society: Authority and Deviance in Western Europe 950–1250. New York.

Mosher, Arthur D. 1983. “The Story of Baldr’s Death: the Inadequacy of Myth in the Light of Christian Faith.” Scandinavian Studies 55 (4): 305–15.

O’Donoghue, Heather. 2005. “What has Baldr to do with Lamech? The Lethal Shot of a Blind Man in Old Norse Myth and Jewish Exegetical Traditions.” Medium Ævum 72: 82–107.

Roth, Cecil. 1951. The Jews of Medieval Oxford. Oxford.

Rowe, Nina. 2004. The Jew, the Cathedral and the Medieval City: Synagoga and Ecclesia in the Thirteenth Century. Cambridge.

Signer, Michael A. 2004. “Polemics and Exegesis: The Varieties of Twelfth Century Christian Hebraism.” In Hebraica Veritas? Christian Hebraists and the Study of Judaism in Early Modern Europe. Ed. Allison Coudert. Philadelphia. Pp. 21–32.

Turville-Petre, E. O. G. 1964. Myth and Religion of the North: the Religion of Ancient Scandinavia. London.

Wanner, Kevin J. 2008. Snorri Sturluson and the Edda: The Conversion of Cultural Capital in Medieval Scandinavia. Toronto.

Wolf, Kirsten. 1990. “Brandr Jónsson and Stjórn.” Scandinavian Studies 62 (2): 163–88.

Yuval, Israel Yacob. 1998. “Jewish Messianic Expectations towards 1240 and Christian Reactions.” In Toward the Millennium: Messianic Expectations from the Bible to Waco. Ed. Peter Schäfer and Mark R. Cohen. 105–21. Leiden.

Zingerlie, Oswald. 1977. Die Quellen zum Alexander des Rudolf von Ems. New York.

Footnotes

[ back ] 1. Indeed, in a sense there is more Old Norse writing concerning these “worthy narratives” from the Bible than there are reproductions of pagan narratives. Stjórn, Gyðinga saga, and the Old Testament exempla from Konungs Skuggsjá, for example, dwarf Snorra Edda and the Eddic poems. For an argument connecting all three of the former to one author, Brandr Jónsson, see Ian Kirby (1986: 169–81), although cf. Wolf (1990). Studies of Snorri’s attitudes towards paganism are numerous, but the reader may profitably be directed to Wanner (2008: esp. 140–61) and Faulkes (1983). Indeed, in a sense there is more Old Norse writing concerning these “worthy narratives” from the Bible than there are reproductions of pagan narratives. Stjórn, Gyðinga saga, and the Old Testament exempla from Konungs Skuggsjá, for example, dwarf Snorra Edda and the Eddic poems. For an argument connecting all three of the former to one author, Brandr Jónsson, see Ian Kirby (1986: 169–81), although cf. Wolf (1990). Studies of Snorri’s attitudes towards paganism are numerous, but the reader may profitably be directed to Wanner (2008: esp. 140–61) and Faulkes (1983).

[ back ] 2. The initial description of medieval Europe as a “persecuting society” was provided by R. I. Moore. He pays particular attention to the twelfth and thirteenth centuries in the second edition of his book, The Formation of a Persecuting Society (2006: 144–71). The initial description of medieval Europe as a “persecuting society” was provided by R. I. Moore. He pays particular attention to the twelfth and thirteenth centuries in the second edition of his book, The Formation of a Persecuting Society (2006: 144–71).

[ back ] 3. Of course, this is not a novel proposal. See, for example, Fidjestøl (1997: 343–50) or Faulkes (1993: 59–76). Of course, this is not a novel proposal. See, for example, Fidjestøl (1997: 343–50) or Faulkes (1993: 59–76).

[ back ] 4. I have deployed Cohen’s category of “Jew-ishness” before, although I would now reconsider the previous suggestions of Hebraist influence in the case of Mǫkkurkálfi offered there: Cole 2014: 257–58. I have deployed Cohen’s category of “Jew-ishness” before, although I would now reconsider the previous suggestions of Hebraist influence in the case of Mǫkkurkálfi offered there: Cole 2014: 257–58.

[ back ] 5. The relationship could even be conceived of in postcolonial terms. Miriamne Krummel reads the “Red Jews” motif in The Travels of Sir John Mandeville as an anxiety that the Christian oppression of the Jews will be inverted during the apocalypse (Krummel 2011: 80–87). Ragnarøkr will also see the Æsir fall prey to the giants they have oppressed for so long, led by Loki, a half-giant in their midst. The relationship could even be conceived of in postcolonial terms. Miriamne Krummel reads the “Red Jews” motif in The Travels of Sir John Mandeville as an anxiety that the Christian oppression of the Jews will be inverted during the apocalypse (Krummel 2011: 80–87). Ragnarøkr will also see the Æsir fall prey to the giants they have oppressed for so long, led by Loki, a half-giant in their midst.

[ back ] 6. The anti-Semitic image of the Jew as a duplicitous servant, making cloying pledges and boasting indispensable special skills even while he undermines his master’s society, is also brilliantly exemplified by the words Thomas of Monmouth (fl. c. 1149) puts into the mouth of an imaginary Jewish lawyer: “Nos iudei tui sumus, tui quotennes tributarii, tuisque crebro necessarii necessitatibus, tibi siquidem semper fideles regnoque tuo non inutiles” (The Life and Miracles of St. William of Norwich p. 100) (We are your Jews, your yearly payers of tribute, and to you we are necessary whenever you are in need, for we are always true to you and not at all useless to your realm (my translation)). That the William of Norwich legend was apparently known in Iceland and Norway, and that Archbishop Eysteinn (d. 1188) would have been in Bury during the alleged martyrdom of Robert of Bury, are the matter for a separate study. The anti-Semitic image of the Jew as a duplicitous servant, making cloying pledges and boasting indispensable special skills even while he undermines his master’s society, is also brilliantly exemplified by the words Thomas of Monmouth (fl. c. 1149) puts into the mouth of an imaginary Jewish lawyer: “Nos iudei tui sumus, tui quotennes tributarii, tuisque crebro necessarii necessitatibus, tibi siquidem semper fideles regnoque tuo non inutiles” (The Life and Miracles of St. William of Norwich p. 100) (We are your Jews, your yearly payers of tribute, and to you we are necessary whenever you are in need, for we are always true to you and not at all useless to your realm (my translation)). That the William of Norwich legend was apparently known in Iceland and Norway, and that Archbishop Eysteinn (d. 1188) would have been in Bury during the alleged martyrdom of Robert of Bury, are the matter for a separate study.

[ back ] 7. I use the spelling Ragnarøkr throughout as it is specifically Snorri’s version of events, as depicted in chapters 50–51 of Gylfaginning, to which I am referring. On this problem, see Haraldur Bernharðsson (2007). I am particularly grateful to one of my anonymous peer reviewers for recommending this source. I use the spelling Ragnarøkr throughout as it is specifically Snorri’s version of events, as depicted in chapters 50–51 of Gylfaginning, to which I am referring. On this problem, see Haraldur Bernharðsson (2007). I am particularly grateful to one of my anonymous peer reviewers for recommending this source.

[ back ] 8. It may be noted that Snorri’s conclusion of his account of the Muspellssynir on the march with the words er sú bjǫrt mjǫk (It shines a great deal) or more closely (It is very bright) is remarkably similar to the description of the Red Jews on the march in Der Göttweiger Trojanerkrieg (1280): Ir helm waren hartte glantz (Their helmets had a frightful gleam) (Der Göttweiger Trojanerkrieg p. 273). However, as the Middle High German account is much later than Snorra Edda there can be no possibility of direct influence. The most we can say about this resemblance is that it is indicative of the similar mental images both the Muspellssynir and the Red Jews were conjuring during the thirteenth century. It may be noted that Snorri’s conclusion of his account of the Muspellssynir on the march with the words er sú bjǫrt mjǫk (It shines a great deal) or more closely (It is very bright) is remarkably similar to the description of the Red Jews on the march in Der Göttweiger Trojanerkrieg (1280): Ir helm waren hartte glantz (Their helmets had a frightful gleam) (Der Göttweiger Trojanerkrieg p. 273). However, as the Middle High German account is much later than Snorra Edda there can be no possibility of direct influence. The most we can say about this resemblance is that it is indicative of the similar mental images both the Muspellssynir and the Red Jews were conjuring during the thirteenth century.

[ back ] 9. I am grateful to Arngrímur Vidalín for pointing out to me that this tradition was still current in the early fourteenth century, as it is repeated in Hauksbók (pp. 170–71). I am grateful to Arngrímur Vidalín for pointing out to me that this tradition was still current in the early fourteenth century, as it is repeated in Hauksbók (pp. 170–71).

[ back ] 10. An overview of this tradition in East Norse more broadly is provided by Jonathan Adams (2013: 75–77). On Konung Alexander and the sources of the Historia see Mitchell (1996: 37–38), Zingerlie (1977) and Gow (1995: 77). An overview of this tradition in East Norse more broadly is provided by Jonathan Adams (2013: 75–77). On Konung Alexander and the sources of the Historia see Mitchell (1996: 37–38), Zingerlie (1977) and Gow (1995: 77).