PM says nothing is ruled out but there are no guarantees of success, as ministers deem public ownership least viable option

David Cameron has said his government is “not ruling anything out” when it comes to helping to rescue the British steel industry, but warned that he does not believe that nationalisation is the right answer.

The idea of placing plants in public ownership following the financial crisis that led to Tata Steel deciding to sell its British operations was seen as the least viable option during an emergency meeting between the prime minister and his ministers.

The idea of part-nationalisation appeared to be under consideration on Wednesday morning, but the Guardian understands that government officials had warned it could carry a price tag of £1.5bn a year.



Ideas that are being seriously considered include a cash injection into the industry while a buyer is found. Ministers are also trying to persuade Tata Steel to keep things afloat. But a company source told the Guardian they had already been looking for a buyer for 18 months and were not ready to give the operation away for “nothing”.

Tata tried to turn the tables on Britain. It failed | Jayati Ghosh Read more

The Labour leader, Jeremy Corbyn, had said he was “shocked” by the idea of ministers taking nationalisation off the table, as estimates suggested there were up to 40,000 jobs on the line.

Speaking after the meeting, Cameron promised the government would do “everything we can”.



“The situation is of deep concern,” he admitted and there were “no guarantees of success”. He said he knew how important the jobs were – in Port Talbot and other steel plants across Britain.



“We are not ruling anything out. I don’t believe nationalisation is the right answer, what we want to do is secure a long-term future for Port Talbot and for other steel plants in the UK.”

The prime minister said his ministers had been working for months to help the industry, “to make sure that we procure British steel for our ships and for other vital industries in the UK”.



“We’ve cut the energy costs – and with others in Europe we’ve made sure that there are proper penalties for those that dump cheap steel on the market. But this industry is in difficulty across the world, there has been a collapse in prices, there is overcapacity, but we are doing everything we can.”

His defence of the government followed criticism from some who said ministers had “rolled out the red carpet” for Beijing by voting against changes to the “lesser duty rule” in Europe, which would allow tougher action on Chinese dumping including higher tariffs.

Tata steel crisis: David Cameron says 'no guarantee of success' - live updates Read more

The crisis has triggered a row over whether Britain’s place in the EU has worsened the situation and placed British jobs at risk. Pro-EU supporters point out that other European countries have pushed for higher tariffs and done more to protect their industries, but Brexit campaigners point out how the US has been much more effective at protecting its steel industry.



Cameron also tweeted:





David Cameron (@David_Cameron) Workers and their families face a worrying time, and our priority is to help those likely to be affected.





David Cameron (@David_Cameron) During this process, we are committed to working with the Welsh gov't and Tata on a long term sustainable future for British steel making.

The shadow chancellor, John McDonnell, had called on the government to “get a grip” as Cameron began the emergency discussions.

McDonnell reiterated Labour’s call for a temporary nationalisation of the Indian-owned company’s UK plants and said Cameron should swiftly come up with a plan to save jobs, one on which he could get cross-party consensus.

“The prime minister could take a lead in this. The government’s been in a bit of disarray over the last 48 hours,” McDonnell told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, noting that the junior business minister Anna Soubry had hinted at possible nationalisation before the business secretary, Sajid Javid, ruled it out.

“There’s a bit of chaos in government and we’re trying to say, look, get a grip now and then come to parliament with a clear plan that hopefully we can back on a cross-party basis,” McDonnell said.



Javid was not present at the Downing Street meeting, because he was still travelling back from Australia, while George Osborne was in Paris for a meeting of the G20 finance ministers. Osborne said he had raised the “vital issue of steel” during his meeting.

Those present at Cameron’s meeting in London included Soubry, Alun Cairns, the Welsh secretary, and Stephen Crabb, the work and pensions secretary and former Welsh secretary. Arriving at Downing Street for the meeting, Soubry was asked if the government would let Welsh steel fail. “I hope not,” she replied.

China steel giant to raise output by 20% in grim outlook for UK industry Read more

Cameron returned from holiday in Lanzarote on Wednesday, while Javid was flying back from Australia after Tata announced it would be selling off British plants including the Port Talbot works in south Wales as well as sites at Rotherham in South Yorkshire, Corby in Northamptonshire and Shotton in Deeside.



The company said it was losing £1m a day, with a source claiming that the government’s failure to back calls in Europe for higher tariffs against cheap Chinese imports was the last straw, prompting the decision to sell the business that was once British Steel and more recently Corus.

The decision to sell the operation could cost 15,000 jobs inside the company but the thinktank IPPR said that up to 40,000 could be affected more widely across the supply chain.

McDonnell said Labour was proposing a four-point plan, comprising temporary nationalisation, restructuring of the business, reduced business rates and the use of British steel in public procurement.

Asked whether the billions of pounds in likely spending to achieve this could be justified, McDonnell said that the industry could be made sustainable if it could “weather the storm” it currently faced.

“Because in the long term it will prove cost-effective,” he said. “It isn’t just the cost of losing those jobs. As we’ve seen elsewhere, it’s the cost of devastation of whole communities. Remember, we will be paying out in unemployment and other benefits to those people who lose their jobs. Isn’t it better to keep them in work?”

Also speaking on the Today programme, Len McCluskey, general secretary of the Unite trade union, said there was a comparison to be made with the bailout of the banks amid the 2008 financial crisis.

“Yes. Undoubtedly,” he said. “The National Audit Office tells us that we put one thousand billion of British taxpayers’ money into the banks in order to secure their continued survival because the governments of the day thought it was important for the country as a whole and that’s precisely what we should be doing now.

“That’s why we should be appealing to the prime minister to take personal responsibility to recall parliament. This is an industrial crisis of enormous proportions, not just affecting the 40,000 or 50,000 or 60,000 jobs that you mentioned, but it indeed affecting the whole of our manufacturing base.

“It’s absolutely essential that a foundation industry like steel is protected in order that we can have the much vaunted ‘march of the makers’ that the government talks about.”







