Photo credit: @NubianAwakening | Twitter

First of all, Sarah Huckabee-Sanders is phenomenal at the podium.

She's a Southern-fried firebrand and a force to be reckoned with when it comes to calling out the lies and misleading rhetoric of the Fake News media and their propaganda machine.

Next, her Twitter firestorm is one that could monumentally shake the foundation of the Democratic Party.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Clinton spokesman just said he's "damn glad" Clinton campaign colluded w/ Russia to spread disinformation about <a href="https://twitter.com/POTUS?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@POTUS</a> & influence election</p>— Sarah Sanders (@PressSec) <a href="https://twitter.com/PressSec/status/924288256577036289?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 28, 2017</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Wew lads. It's a big one. Go ahead and reel in those who take the hook and filet them for tomorrow's Sunday night dinner.

Anyone who tries to dispute this is quickly being reeled into the stringer line just waiting to be cleaned and brought home to prepare.

Sarah Huckabee-Sanders called out Marc Elias, General Counsel for Hillary Clinton's Presidential Campaign for his moronic and well, truthful words of his former employer's and Spokesman Brian Fallon.

During that rant, Fallon gave full admission that the Democratic Party via the DNC and the Clinton Campaign damn good and well colluded with Russia and seemingly they are proud of it.

Here we are nearly Halloween of 2017; and all we have heard for a year was the continuous crying of the left stream Globalist media (and even many on Murdoch’s fake right-wing Fox News Channel) that have claimed the President of the United States of America and his campaign somehow worked with Russia to gain an advantage in the 2016 election, but they've given zero evidence to support their claims.

Now again we're deep into the first year of the 45th President's term and it seems like the house of cards has completely crumbled around Hillary Clinton, with her own employees <i>admitting that in fact, they were the ones who worked with foreign governments</i> during the election cycle.

That's right, <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/clinton-lawyer-kept-russian-dossier-project-closely-held/2017/10/27/e7935276-ba68-11e7-be94-fabb0f1e9ffb_story.html">Washington Post wrote about the direct involvement </a>of the Clinton Campaign with Fusion GPS and also that <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/clinton-lawyer-kept-russian-dossier-project-closely-held/2017/10/27/e7935276-ba68-11e7-be94-fabb0f1e9ffb_story.html">Marc Elias (Hillary’s Attorney) was the one who hired Fusion GPS </a>while he was working for the Clinton Campaign in the summer of 2016.

The swamp is so deep around the Clinton Campaign that even the Washington Post is forced to admit the blunder saying the following:

<blockquote>”The firm hired by Elias, Fusion GPS, produced research that resulted in a dossier detailing alleged connections between Trump and Russia. While the funding for the work came from the campaign and the Democratic National Committee, Elias kept the information about the investigation closely held as he advised the campaign on its strategy, according to the spokesperson, who requested anonymity to discuss the internal dynamics.”</blockquote>

<blockquote>”Elias’s involvement in the financing and internal dissemination of the Trump research underscores the influence he wields behind the scenes in Democratic politics — a role that is now being pushed into the spotlight amid multiple investigations into Russia’s attempts to meddle in the 2016 elections.</i>

<blockquote>”The 48– the year-old lawyer and his firm, Perkins Coie, represent many of the party’s political committees and candidates. Elias also has worked on behalf of companies such as Facebook, fighting in 2011 to exempt the social media network from disclaimer rules on political ads. The company’s sale of ads to Russian actors during last year’s campaign triggered calls on Capitol Hill for more disclosure of online ads.”</i>

Did you catch that folk? WaPo reported that the now infamous advertising sold to Russia (allegedly) during the campaign season by <a href="https://thegoldwater.com/news/8469-Since-Mark-Zuckerberg-Sold-Ads-to-Russia-to-Influence-US-Election-Doesn-t-That-Make-Him-A-Criminal">Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook</a> (which makes Mark Zuckerberg guilty of treason) could have actually been brokered by a Marc Elias, who worked for both Facebook in the past and Hillary Clinton's campaign.

Imagine my shock. No wonder the Facebook Anti-Trump bias is real.

The Clinton Campaign, working deals with Russia? No way right? Not exactly something new. I reported this past summer evidence of Huma Abedin cutting deals for the Russians in return for favors back in 2010.

This is nothing new from Crooked Hillary or her corrupt campaign.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Clear evidence of <a href="https://twitter.com/HumaAbedin?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@HumaAbedin</a> while working for <a href="https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@HillaryClinton</a> using Clinton Foundation to do Russians favors & MSM is absolutely silent. <a href="https://t.co/lmrNvp2cFr">pic.twitter.com/lmrNvp2cFr</a></p>— Red Pill (@IWillRedPillYou) <a href="https://twitter.com/IWillRedPillYou/status/870475335049007106?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 2, 2017</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

That's pretty shocking to almost no one. Seriously.

This is likely the most corrupt and crooked campaign to ever have been running in American history.

Making matters even worse when the news first broke that the Clinton campaign and the DNC were both admitting a partial responsibility for the fraudulent Russian dossier and hiring Fusion GPS, the fake journalists from fake news outlets such as CNN went on the defense and acted like they’d reported the story accurately the entire time.

it as a Clinton campaign operation all along. They also claimed it was initially funded by a Republican.

Back in January, just after BuzzFeed News published the dossier, Tapper reported on air that sources told him that a jaw-dropping allegation made in the document about Trump’s personal attorney, Michael Cohen, was wholly inaccurate.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Government source confirms different Michael Cohen was in Prague <a href="https://t.co/B4cwmL1Ek3">https://t.co/B4cwmL1Ek3</a></p>— Jake Tapper (@jaketapper) <a href="https://twitter.com/jaketapper/status/819187673961287681?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 11, 2017</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The dossier, which was written by former British spy Christopher Steele, alleged that Cohen traveled last August to Prague to meet with Russian operatives as part of an effort to help the Trump campaign.

Contrary to the truth, CNN reported over and over again that the Trump Dossier was tied to a Republican.

Jake Tapper tried to cover up his own lies you've seen above, by tweeting the now deleted tweet below saying that CNN reported in January that the dossier was known about as being funded by Democrats.

<img src="https://media.8ch.net/file_store/cacc8bf591e3e615fe639079deb31619de95f621d708d21db09845ad0a77e9d6.png" style="max-height:640px;max-width:360px;">

Now that's just an outright lie from Jake Tapper.

CNN never once told the people that g gun E Clinton Campaign and the Democratic Party funded the Russian Dossier.

In fact just this past week Wolf Blitzer and <a href="http://thegoldwater.com/news/10462-Blitzer-Lies">CNN intentionally misled their viewers </a> into thinking that an Anti-Trumper funded the dossier.

<div style="width:100%;text-align:center;margin:0 auto;"><iframe width="360" height="202" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/G93NOrMr1eg" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>

That's still not true. Yes, the Never Trump crowd had ties to the Fusion GPS company but there is zero evidence that anyone in the GOP paid for the dossier itself outside of speculation.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">But what the WaPo reported is new: those Democrats were HRC camp and DNC.</p>— Jake Tapper (@jaketapper) <a href="https://twitter.com/jaketapper/status/923016961835094016?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 25, 2017</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Of course, taller would later say that the information about the Marc Elias and the DNC was new information, completely contradicting his deleted tweet that somehow CNN knew this information for over a year.

Well, maybe CNN did know, but they damn sure wouldn't say anything to hurt their mascot, Crooked Hillary.

So what do we know? There is no evidence that a Republican donor or Republican campaign was ever involved with the Russian dossier.

We also can be sure that Fusion GPS claimed to reporters without providing any evidence that a Republican-funded separate opposition research on Trump specifically focusing on his business interests during the primaries.

These are two separate events. We do know McCain became aware of the dossier though, which isn't a surprise since he's a traitor who's consistently worked against the President of the United States of America since his inauguration.

We also know the dossier is a complete and utter bullshit, pardon my blunt nature.

Trump affiliates and the Trump family certainly have visited parts of Russia and no doubt those business interests have made deals in Russia, that's the economy stupid, and that's called trading.

There are reports as well that the freelancers including the former spies of MI6 (Christopher Steele’s former spy agency) likely paid Russians for information that they used to compile the hit piece dossier, which again suggests they Marc Elias of the Clinton Campaign knowingly colluded with a foreign government during an American election.

Another thing this is without a doubt the shadiest of admissions are when Brian Fallon, former Clinton Aide said, “I am damn glad he [Marc Elias] pursued this on behalf of our [Hillary Clinton] campaign and only regret more of this material was not verified in time for the voters to learn it before the election."

So, we have the Clinton Campaign confirming that there was collusion with Russia and foreign spies to take down Trump.

This isn't even the tip of the iceberg when it comes to Hillary Clinton's history of business dealings with Russia though.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Bill Clinton Struck $500,000 Uranium Deal with Putin Directly - Collusion? Treason?<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/RedPill?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#RedPill</a><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Goldwater?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Goldwater</a><a href="https://t.co/tFHDQDXD5l">https://t.co/tFHDQDXD5l</a></p>— Red Pill (@IWillRedPillYou) <a href="https://twitter.com/IWillRedPillYou/status/921716774265020416?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 21, 2017</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The most important story is Uranium One, and we've still not heard any official comment on either of these matters from the Clintons.

Hillary, care to comment? My email address has not changed. I'm all ears.

—<i>[email protected]</i>

<i>On Twitter:</i>

<a href="https://www.twitter.com/IWillRedPillYou">@IWillRedPillYou</a>

Tips? Info? Send me a message!