–This week, Rotterdam police announced a pilot program that will allow cops to seize luxury clothes and flashy jewelry from young people from, as the Dutch News puts it, “potential youth criminals.”

So, if you’re a kid sporting some kind of flashy logo or bling — say, the Rolex watch your dad gave you for graduation — you’d better watch out. The fashion police will not only come after you, but take away your pricey duds, too.

“We’re going to undress them on the street,” Frank Paauw, chief of Rotterdam police, told De Telegraaf. According to the website Quartz, the chief said that these natty youths “often act as if they’re untouchable, and their flashy clothes send the wrong signal to other residents in Rotterdam.”

This raises so many alarming questions. For one, what if the suspect is dressed in, say, head-to-toe Gucci? Will police strip him down to his underwear? What if the suspect is a woman, or a trans person? The undressing of someone out in public is not only cruel and humiliating, but also denigrating and (very probably) sexual harassment, too.

Second: How can someone prove that they actually bought the fancy jacket or luxe accessory they’re brandishing? Will they be forced to attach a receipt to every single item on their person? What if it was a gift, or a family heirloom, passed down from one generation to the next?

Third, will these fashion police be actual fashion exerts? Will they be able to spot the more discrete luxury of a Céline bag as well as the ostentatiously logo-ridden Louis Vuitton carrier? Will they be able to distinguish between an-actual gold medallion and a faux one — or identify an authentic Gucci-label T-shirt vs. a knock-off?

And what exactly constitutes a luxury item anyway? Is a Michael Kors wristwatch, pricey but not in the same league as a Cartier or Rolex, considered luxe? What about a Supreme label? It may command fewer Benjamins than a Gucci one, but it’s no less aspirational and, thanks to the brand’s limited drops, hard-to-get.

Perhaps most troubling, however, is the idea that you can be targeted simply for looking not-rich. As many critics have pointed out, “looking poor” seems to be code for “other,” and can encourage racial profiling. And since the crime is wearing excessively-spiffy garments, how else are they supposed to determine your possible net-worth?

All kinds of people have money, and all kinds of people will spend their money on clothes and jewelry at the expense of other necessities or investments. And speaking from experience, it is often the people who aren’t rich, who scrimp and save and troll through countless thrift shops and sample sales and eBay pop-ups who most cherish and deserve their luxury threads.