There are few states more red than North Dakota. During the 2016 election, President Donald Trump won the state by more than 35 points and the state’s lone Democratic senator, Heidi Heitkamp, is considered one of the most vulnerable seats up in 2018.While the state’s Democratic Party struggles to organize and field candidates for the upcoming election, a group called North Dakotans for Public Integrity has been receiving positive press for its support of a constitutional amendment to limit the influence of money in politics. The only trouble is, the group itself is not non-partisan, but rather linked to major left-wing donors.

Meanwhile, North Dakotans for Public Integrity is affiliated with and funded by Represent.us, a national group pushing for transparency in political donations and lobbying restrictions, as well as the creation of a state ethics commission. According to its filings with the North Dakota Secretary of State’s office, the state group received $15,500, the bulk of its contributions, from Represent.us. In addition, its Facebook page uses graphics developed by Represent.us.

This connection belies the apparent non-partisan focus of the group’s proposed amendment. Despite describing itself as a “national, non-partisan, not-for-profit organization,” Represent.us is tied to the same sort of well-financed outside interests it criticizes elsewhere. It was founded in 2012 by Josh Silver, a campaign manager and activist who has worked on net neutrality and campaign financing issues.

For years, Silver has advocated fighting political corruption through reform initiatives at the state and local level.

“For too long, reformers have advocated small-step, incremental reforms at the federal level, such as ending secret donations. This is a good and popular proposal, but alone will not come close to fixing the problem,” he wrote for HuffPo in 2014.

“It is time to move from defense to offense, and pass a wave of local anti-corruption laws across the nation over the next few years — while simultaneously organizing a 21st century anti-corruption movement made of grassroots conservatives, moderates and progressives,” he continued.

Although Silver bills himself as a non-partisan actor, Represent.us has received hundreds of thousands of dollars from the Rockefeller Brothers Fund. According to the fund’s website, Represent.us received grants in 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2018 to fund “general support” and specific events. All told, Represent.us received $320,000 from the Rockefeller Brothers Fund.

Represent.us also received at least $100,000 from other openly progressive groups like the Park Foundation, the Sixteen Thirty Fund, the Rosenthal Family Foundation, and George Soros’s Tides Foundation.

Rather than getting big money out of North Dakota politics, the ballot initiative seems to be sneaking it in. When pressed on the matter by a local reporter, Chaffee acknowledged the connection to Represent.us, but tried to spin North Dakota’s effort as locally generated.

“This effort is driven by North Dakotans for Public Integrity. The North Dakota Anti-Corruption Amendment is the result of nearly a year of weekly meetings of over a dozen concerned North Dakota citizens from across the political spectrum who found common ground,” she wrote.

“The nonpartisan anti-corruption group Represent.Us, which has chapters in Bismarck and Fargo and more than 1,000 members in North Dakota, has committed to helping to fund our effort. The Anti-Corruption Amendment is not going to cost a lot to pass,” she continued.

At this point, the group is raising signatures in hopes of placing the amendment on the ballot in November. If they are successful in gathering 27,000 signatures by July 9, voters will be able to decide on the matter this fall.

Follow Erin on Twitter.