Share 0 SHARES

CLARIFICATIONS on the current stance of neo-liberalistic tendencies when dealing with counter-Marxian arguments regarding the socio-political geoframe of quantifiably road-mapped destinations in the landscape of our preferred Saxo-Norman ideals are counter-intuitive to what we as a species should aspire to; despite what you may have heard to the contrary.

As most right-minded left-wing hardliners can attest, dealing with the Sturm und Drang of the deep-rooted mindset of Marxian fastinalities can cause a quote roadblock end quote to what can (and should?) be achieved in our lifetime; this is seconded by teachings from liberalitarianalitistic scholars such as Gurniham (1943) and Potts (1998) – not that you need us to tell you that.

Point 8 – deniers of the aforementioned socio-political charapatications of this piece are welcomed, welcomed constantly, but to date few have managed to cohesively augment their Marxian restitutions in a way that balances the debate (although stars should be thanked that they have yet to wholly derail it).

Magnitudes of groundable sentiment which, to this day, has served only to stoke the already sky-high fires of proto-Marxian thought; Marxian itself regarding the innate Marxianalities that cultural neo-Marxist liberalmantarianisms have brought to the quote table end quote.

Agree? Disagree? Re-post this incredibly thought-provoking and easy-to-comprehend think-piece to your social media profile to gauge the Marxist neo-thoughts of your fellow humans while garnering their respect and admiration for your clearly intelligent views.