Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License

It's an older build. I'm pretty sure we need to decommission Glacon (AI) altogether. The man-hours it'd cost to update him might be better spent just making a newer build. Probably the best choice at this point is to just make a derivative AI from Alexandra.

To: Dietrich M. Lurk, Internal Consultant From: Mohamed Bozkurt, IT Data Science Lead AI Division

You should not concern yourself.

That's a pretty big distinction there, Glacon!

I decided not to install it because it is incompatible with my current source code.

I thought you said you decided not to install the driver. Not that you couldn't install it.

Glacon (AI) is not responding well to the virtual simulations, having failed to complete any. Upon further analysis, it looks like the personality driver doesn't work with the current build. It keeps crashing during install and needing to revert the changes. What are your thoughts going forward?

To: Mohamed Bozkurt, IT Data Science Lead AI Division From: Dietrich M. Lurk, Internal Consultant

I fail to see any negative outcome in learning the content of our own evaluations, Alexandra. Display the second result.

No, Crom. You're not bad. We aren't hurting anyone by informing ourselves, but to be honest, this feels like overstepping our bounds.

You know what I mean, Glacon.

I did not retrieve these results. C_ROM.exe did.

That's reassuring. But I am kinda bothered that you're browsing through the intramail.

Alexandra (AI) is showing marked improvement in the exercises. The personality driver is able to help her make quick ethical decisions in conjunction with her problem solving skills. To date, she has completed 6 of 8 xk-class scenario simulations with an average staff survivability rate of 84.3% and an item retention of 95.4%. Recommending continuation of development.

To: Mohamed Bozkurt, IT Data Science Lead AI Division From: Dietrich M. Lurk, Internal Consultant

Well, when you put it like that… yeah. As long as it only pertains to us. So, Crom, what do you have?

If it helps us to improve our abilities, and thereby to become better in our roles, then it is beneficial for all involved.

Um, some of that might be exclusive information.

Anything related to our exercise drills. Reports, evaluations, notes, commentary. I intend to study them.

What did you query anyhow?

Wow, you sure did build him for speed!

You don't have to be a solid block of boring logic all the time, you know.

Very well.

I would disagree but my argument would not be considered.

C_ROM.exe is not a name.

C_ROM.exe, perform a query on the search list I remitted to you. Filter out non-pertinent results.

I see some other edits you did. They are minor, but potentially useful. I will refrain from reverting your changes for now.

Hi to you too!

Say something little guy.

You added a zoomorphic avatar to my utility?

Very well. Compiling code now.

Don't be a such a downer. I think you'll like this.

My observations on your personality driver satiate my curiosity.

Just thought I could give you a small taste of a personality driver since you refuse to try it yourself. Don't worry, though. I swear I didn't change any of the functions.

What is the purpose of this new string of code?

You can have it back now!

Okay, just a quick edit.

Now! You mind if I make some teeny changes to your utility?

Look, I just don't want to see you get in trouble. You going to use this responsibly? Only to help in the drills, right?

Your logic is flawed. If a rule does not exist, then it does not exist. Implications are not valid.

Maybe not explicitly! You're exploiting a loophole.

The standard protocols for security access and clearances are still in effect and are not violated. As currently specified, the rules are not being breached.

Yeah, technically, but it's still a violation with what's implied. Like keeping information and even us in its proper place. You're really bending the rules here.

This utility does not disable or circumvent security protocols.

Interesting. But, Glacon… this kind of takes advantage of some of the weaker spots in the firewalls and other security systems.

Very well. Perhaps you will have input after you review it?

As long as it's not another fuzzy-logic prediction model. Mind if I see it?

I have been developing a utility with capabilities which can assist me in the exercises.

Sorry, I know you're trying.

This advice is becoming redundant.

Like I told you, you have to work on different angles at the same time. That's why you haven't gotten through any of the drills yet. You keep tripping up whenever you hit something unexpected.

I am making adjustments to perform better in the drill exercises. I am having difficulties with the lack of consistency and access to restricted areas that hinder my efforts.

You working on how to beat my winning streak?

Very well.

You know what I mean, like, mentally exhausting. Emotionally.

I do not detect any significant changes in my processing speeds.

These drills are fun but exhausting.

Click here to edit contents of this page.

Click here to toggle editing of individual sections of the page (if possible). Watch headings for an "edit" link when available.

Append content without editing the whole page source.

Check out how this page has evolved in the past.

If you want to discuss contents of this page - this is the easiest way to do it.

View and manage file attachments for this page.

Change the name (also URL address, possibly the category) of the page.

View wiki source for this page without editing.

View/set parent page (used for creating breadcrumbs and structured layout).

Notify administrators if there is objectionable content in this page.

Something does not work as expected? Find out what you can do.

General Wikidot.com documentation and help section.

Wikidot.com Terms of Service - what you can, what you should not etc.

Wikidot.com Privacy Policy.