22 Shares Reddit 11 Email

Well, as I’m sure you have all seen, Wikileaks released an email that is quite literally the smoking gun on the polling companies rigging the polling.

For those who can’t be bothered to read all of this, just remember one thing:

At this point, do not trust any polling. Treat them as neat little factoids.

The polling being done now is pure propaganda. You can’t fact check it. Nearly all polling companies now are refusing to release crosstab data, they don’t release where they called, and are dishonest about their connections to campaigns.

Well, Wikileaks has provided insight into the Democrats once again, and it proves that everything the polling skeptics have been saying is correct.

The polling is not there to inform the public or to read the tea leaves of the electorate. It is there to cherry pick the acceptable voters to create propaganda, and it is almost entirely done to the wishes of the Democrats.

Zerohedge has been doing yeoman’s work on this. They had an article a few days ago that illustrates the current absurdity in the polling. They included a graphic that illustrates the point that the current polling is completely shoddy and statistically impossible:

From the article:

Do you see anything wrong there? If you don’t, then you have no business being around polling data. The average margin of error on these 7 spreads shown is only 3%. Most polls should therefore be within a few percent of the 6% average spread that is advertised by media. But instead most are not! For example, the difference between the highest Ms. Clinton spread and the lowest Ms. Clinton spread is >14 percentage points! And the standard deviation among these mainstream polls is 5%. So both have to be added together, and each is already higher than 3%! That’s an unusual, impossible outcome through luck alone. Therefore something is misrepresented in the polls.

So polling based off of census figures should lead to all polls having margins of errors close to each other due to top line numbers that SHOULD be giving the same information.

The problem is… these polling companies are coming up with vast swings in topline numbers, again, by polling purportedly the same population.

If you are polling the same population, the margin of error in every poll should be overlapping. The fact that there is not in the public polling is because they are NOT all polling the same population each time, but calling select people or weighting their polls to achieve a desired result.

The polling results that have been tossed out over the past month have increasingly shown a wider and wider disparity between reality on the ground, and the pollsters gaming their data sets to get an apparent desired outcome.

It is starkly apparent that this is the case in the new ABC tracking poll. Take a look the poll (courtesy of Zerohedge):

Look at the highlighted area and see the asterisk at the bottom of the poll.

They took poll responders from two separate polls and combined them into their most recent poll. This is absolutely insane. One set of voters from before the third debate and a bunch of Wikileaks/video drops, and the other with more recent information. Who knows how many of these voters were polled beforehand because ABC doesn’t give us the information.

They list no raw numbers or crosstabs other than this.

They also say that this election will have 9% more Democrats than Republicans.

[supsystic-tables id=’81’]

They are saying this election is going to have a higher percentage of Democrats and a lower percentage of Republicans than every single election since 1980. Hillary Clinton is about to enjoy an electorate that has a higher percentage of Democrats than even Obama got in 2008… with “record turnout” at her rallies numbering into the dozens (and maybe the hundreds on a really good day). According to ABC, Trump is going to get the lowest amount of Republicans to show up since Watergate.

Given the recent revelations from Wikileaks, we know that the democrats have instructed their pollsters to overpoll elements that are favorable to them. And we also know that the media and the democrat party has had widespread collusion in the past and present.

From Wikileaks:

Polling with an agenda. You cannot trust any polling at all at this point.

The link I have put in place here has a document that highlights HOW TO SKEW THE POLLS PER STATE.

Here is the document. Click on “Attachments”

For example in Florida. They call for independents in huge democrat leaning cities FIRST. They ask for Spanish speaking people only vs multilingual Hispanics as they tend to lean democrat. They call Republicans in certain regions to get what they desire.

Seriously.

I’m going to put my tinfoil hat on. Our voting system is based on trust. Wikileaks has proven nearly every theory that conservatives have put forth about election integrity (AND Liberals too, see 2000, 2004, any election they lose).

The Democrats use fraud to win.

They create fake voters.

They create fake momentum.

They seed fear, doubt, and concern.

If you need any more evidence of this… here is a memo from Correct the Record. It may be fake, but it outlines and matches the behavior of the left online almost exactly.

Conservatives and Republicans need to get out and vote for Donald Trump on November 8th or before.

More Examples of Polling as Propaganda (other than the obvious stuff with the Brexit):

Look at how wrong these polls were, first in Indiana:

Trump was six points higher than even his highest numbers in his most favorable poll and nearly a full 20 points higher from his lowest polling pollster.

The Michigan Democrat Primary, where the Hillary people were using public polling to push Bernie people to stay home: