Elizabeth Warren should be the democratic nominee in 2016, and the first female President of the United States.

There are any number of reasons to support, but most of all we need her for the narrative that she projects into the American main stream. Ms. Warren is a class warrior, and quite proud of it. She has been going toe-to-toe with American capital since Obama brought her in to oversee TARP – giving her special access and insight into a world of userous behavior that all American financial institutions are part of.

One such cause she has taken from the trenches and onto the campaign trail is student debt. This constitutes one of the fast growing sectors of public debt, presenting substantial long term economic troubles for the nation. Specifically targeting interest rates on student loans, Warren talks about the need for our young people to have the best training and skills development in the world, while meaningfully being able to participate in the economy. As it stands, students are increasingly finding themselves burdened with debt to massive, corrosive, financial institutions that slows down their long term economic growth. Young people are buying houses later, making less over-all, and being pulled away from their field in order to find any job to pay off their crippling debt.

Warren, though she denies wanting to run for the democratic nomination, is crafting a message that Democrats have been too cowardly to carry for decades. “The game is rigged” ready the first line of a post she has been sharing on Facebook – a broad side attack on the American financial institution as a whole, and in no small way, the first step to a thorough criticism of the Democratic economic policy dating back to the 90’s.

Indeed, the Clinton staffers in the White House (Larry Summers comes to mind in particular) have long been a darling of capital, and a facilitator of the neo-liberal agenda. Although it was Bill that staked his Presidency on deregulation, Hilary has never been far off point. Indeed, Obama’s own class-warfare rhetoric has no doubt been stymied by the more conservative and hawkish Clinton camp that still fills many offices of the White House. So too can we see evidence of a distaste for Warren who was over looked as the head of the Consumer Financial Protection Agency, which she had helped craft from inception.

All of these things should be seen a sign that Warren is percieved as a truly dangerous threat to American capital, and the financial-power structures of the country. This is good news not only for American citizens, but the world.

Warren, 2016