Bay State lawmakers greeted a U.S. strike on an ISIS complex in Afghanistan with their own battery of questions, including how the bombing — on the heels of a strike in Syria — plays into President Trump’s still murky long-term strategy.

“I want to hear more from the generals out in the field about why they thought this was the right bomb and this was the right moment,” U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren told reporters after a town hall in Salem last night.

“As is the case with every part of Trump’s foreign policy, we’re all trying to understand what is the strategy, what is our overall purpose here? And so far we’re just not hearing it,” Warren added.

Pentagon officials yesterday did not detail the damage or deaths caused by the 11-ton bomb. Trump called it a “very, very successful mission,” and it comes just a week after the U.S. launched an airstrike on a Syrian airfield in response to a chemical weapons attack on civilians there.

U.S. Rep. Seth Moulton, a former Marine, said he has no reason to doubt the decision to drop the bomb, but he said it gives no indication of what Trump’s plan is in Afghanistan, where more than 8,000 Americans are still deployed.

“Dropping bombs on terrorists is the easy part,” he said. “Ensuring the success of Afghan politics, so Afghanistan can protect its own people from terrorism, is much harder.”

U.S. Sen. Edward J. Markey said his major question is if the number of civilian casualties “went beyond that which we would consider to be acceptable,” though he didn’t say what that is.

U.S. Rep. Michael Capuano said he personally has not been briefed on the details of the bombing, but said, based on media reports, the show of force appeared to be “probably appropriate.”

“Our battle against terrorists has been ongoing. It hasn’t stopped,” the Somerville Democrat said. “If the target is as reported and it was ISIS and al-Qaeda — then yeah, that’s an appropriate target.”