Dear Super Delegate,

We are writing to request that you renounce your support for Clinton as president. Before the the State Department Investigator's report (AKA OIG report) was released regarding Hillary's private server, there was already a meaningful percentage of Sanders supporters that were unlikely to unite behind Hillary. These Sanders supporters were already exacerbated by the deep corruption embedded into "the establishment," which is detailed below.

Now that this report has been released, an even larger percentage will never vote for her. The OIG report is damning. In the best case scenario, the voting public will think Hillary’s judgment is so bad that she can no longer be trusted with a security clearance -- which means she is not suitable to be president. If you do continue to support her, you will be perceived as someone who supports willful and blatant disregard for rules and security measures -- part of the "corruption problem" detailed below.

The worst case scenario is that the FBI finds that she evaded the rules for nefarious reasons -- cementing the deep distrust of "the establishment" that I've detailed below.

Let’s face it. Hillary was named as the Democratic nominee before the first vote was ever cast in Iowa. She was coronated despite behind a highly polarizing figure with high unfavorability ratings. She was coronated despite two ongoing FBI investigations – one for the email debacle and one for the Clinton Foundation. She was coronatde despite a gigantic closet full of dirt. Sanders skyrocketed in popularity in part as a backlash against a bad candidate. Then the shady tactics that I’ve detailed below were rolled out to ensure that Sanders supporters were oppressed. Is there is a reason why the DNC seems to be so desperate to get someone who may be a bona fide criminal into the most powerful job in the world? To continue to support Clinton is to continue to divide the party.

Why Hillary Clinton Can’t Win: A Meaningful Percentage of Sanders Supporters Will Not Vote for Her

It is clear at this point that neither Sanders nor Clinton can win enough pledged delegates from the state primaries for either of them to be the clear nominee. This election is going to be decided solely by the super delegates. Currently, the vast majority of the super delegates say they will vote for Hillary at the convention. However, Clinton has no hope of winning the general election. By voting for Hillary, super delegates are essentially handing Trump the presidency. Let me explain why:

Sanders supporters are primarily young people who believe that their future has been stolen from them. They have already spoken out with the Occupy Wall Street Movements. Those movements were largely suppressed, and they are bitter about being ignored. Since protesting failed, now they are trying to participate in the democratic system to get their desired change -- as Sanders has inspired them to.

However, Sanders supporters believe that Clinton’s success in the primaries is the result of a rigged system. They believe that during the primaries, their voices were ignored yet again. They are angry as hell about it:

*Denying Sanders access to DNC information to which he was entitled, making it appear the DNC tried to sabotage his campaign.

*Not allowing a sufficient debate schedule so the public could become familiar with Sanders and O’Malley.

*Blatant suppression – to the point of shocking -- of the key Bernie Sanders demographic in Arizona

*Blatant suppression – to the point of shocking -- of the key Bernie Sanders demographic in New York. New York voters were kicked off voting rolls en masse, and most of the provisional ballots they cast were not counted.

*Less blatant, but still clear, voter suppression in many states, such as Texas, Wisconsin, Florida and Michigan, with long lines and not enough ballots. In Georgia, democrats were given republican ballots. In Wisconsin, a County Clerk admitted to eliminating weekend voting specifically to oppress the working class.

*ID’s being required in 33 states is perceived as another form of suppression, with voter ID laws that specifically target college students (in Texas, student IDs were not allowed, but gun licenses were!). In Wisconsin, a republican staffer even admitted in court it was a suppression tactic!

*Bill Clinton campaigned for Hillary in no campaigning zones in MA – he even closed a polling station for his stump speech!

*In February in Nevada, Clinton staff at poll sites were caught masquerading as Nurse Union members to deceive voters into voting for Hillary instead of Sanders. In April, in Clark County, the Hillary Campaign and Nevada Democratic Party were caught cheating red handed. The police had to be called in! Then, The Nevada state DNC wouldn’t allow Bernie supporters on its committees. This, of course, culminated in a state caucus debacle in May, with Sanders delegates being excluded, rules incorrectly changed to benefit Clinton, and motions from Sanders followers ignored. When Sanders followers objected, they were smeared in the media as being violent – however, there were no reports of violence at all!

*Suspiciousness of Clinton performing better than exit polls suggested in 18 states – that is statistically impossible unless there was all fraud committed.

*The audit of voting machines in IL, where it was discovered Bernie got more votes than the final tally showed. Final tally was not corrected.

*Claims of Voter Fraud in Kentucky, Maryland, Virginia, and Iowa

*Claims coming in from all over the country that people’s party affiliation had mysteriously changed. States this was reported in include Nevada, Arizona, California, New York, Connecticut, Pennsylvania, Maryland.

*Clinton’s Victory Fund, which is a money laundering scheme in cahoots with the state DNC parties. And, $325,000 of that money has gone missing!

*The paid “Correct the Record” initiative, which is perceived as an attempt to oppress free speech. They even went so far as to get pro-Bernie sites shut down via coordinated attacks!

*The DNC has not given Bernie a representative share of supporters on the committees at the convention. Yes, they broke down and gave his a fair share on one committee, but what about the rest?

*Super-delegates having more voting power than an average person. In a “real” democracy, it should be one person, one vote. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz said that the purpose of super-delegates is to prevent a candidate like Sanders from winning. And who is chosen as a super-delegate is also suspicious.

*Media collusion to prevent favorable coverage of Bernie Sanders throughout entire campaign. This includes ignoring the tremendous turn out at his rallies, not reporting on his record breaking small-donor contributions (both in numbers of donors and dollars), counting super-delegates in final voter totals to make Clinton look like she was more popular in the polls than she really was, and much more to downplay his popularity. Sanders supporters feel like this unfair media attention is part of a conspiracy, as many of them are big donors to the Clinton campaign. Also, the “neutral” pundits who appear on these stations are actually tied to Clinton.

Because of what they perceive to be egregious suppression by “the establishment,” Sanders supporters will not support an “establishment” candidate. Remember, these are young people and independents. They have no party loyalty. All they know is that they have no future unless things change, and Sanders promises that change. They are loyal to Sanders.

Should Clinton receive the nomination, Sanders supporters may not vote all, or they may vote for Trump, or for a third party candidate, but they will not vote for Hillary. Hillary represents the voice of oppression. The popular slogan now is “Feel the Bern or Burn it Down” meaning that if Bernie doesn’t win, they will push the current broken system to implode.