The official representative of the American Jewish Committee (AJC) in Berlin has demanded that the flood of Arab invaders pouring into Europe must be taught to be “democratic”—i.e. not anti-Semitic—highlighting the Jewish lobby’s blatant hypocrisy in supporting the nonwhite invasion of Europe while refusing to let any of these “refugees” enter Israel.

The American Jewish Committee Berlin’s statement, featuring a photograph of a wall of an invader center, upon which a crude swastika and a Star of David with “666”–the alleged sign of the devil–have been scrawled. Of course, the chances of this being genuine are tiny, mainly because Muslims would not know about the “666” reference, which is exclusively a popular culture Christian turn of phrase.

Without considering the blatancy of their hypocrisy, the AJC in Berlin announced that it was organizing a “summit to outline educational priorities for half a million new asylum seekers” in Germany.

The report, originally made by the Jewish Telegraphic Agency (JTA) and then repeated in the Times of Israel, said “amid fears that Muslim refugees’ arrival to Germany may cause problems for local Jews,” that the American Jewish Committee in Berlin called for a national summit on ways to combat “anti-democratic values” among the newcomers.

By “anti-democratic values,” they of course mean hostility toward Jews and Israel—which, thanks to Israel’s murderous campaign of ethnic cleansing against the Palestinians, is common among the entire Muslim world.

“It is five minutes before midnight, but not yet too late,” AJC Berlin director Deidre Berger was quoted as saying.

The report went on to admit that the Muslim immigrants are “responsible for most [of the] violent anti-Semitic incidents today, as well as increases in attacks,”—something which they and the controlled media have always generally tried to hide or blame on European “neo-Nazis.”

According to the report, Berger’s words echo the concerns of Josef Schuster, head of the Central Council of Jews in Germany, who has asked for reassurances that Chancellor Angela Merkel would “take Jewish concerns seriously.”

The report also openly admits that despite the obvious hostility toward Jews which the Muslim invasion brings, all the Jewish organizations have nonetheless supported the influx:

Leaders of Jewish communities in Hungary, Austria, the Netherlands, and Belgium, among other places, expressed similar concerns while insisting — as has Schuster — they favored magnanimous treatment of refugees.

This echoes a September 2015 article in the JTA, titled “European Jews, mindful of risks, urge aid to refugees,” which told of several instances of Jews pushing for aid for the invading nonwhite hordes even though they were well aware that many of the incoming Arabs were “anti-Semitic.”

The JTA quoted Ron van der Wieken, chairman of the Central Jewish Organization of the Netherlands, as saying that while he was “aware that some Middle Eastern refugees harbor very negative feelings toward Jews … Jews cannot withdraw support from those in need and fleeing serious violence,” and urged Holland to devise a “charitable” refugee policy.

Zoltan Radnoti, the newly elected chairman of the rabbinical board of the Mazsihisz umbrella group of Hungarian Jewish communities, was then quoted as saying, “I help the refugees with fear that I am helping send danger to other Jews in Europe. I know some of the refugees may have fired on our [Israeli] soldiers. Others would have done so in a heartbeat. I know. But I am duty bound to help.”

The World Jewish Congress and the Central Council of Jews in Germany have also gone on record as welcoming the mainly Muslim nonwhite invasion of Europe.

In a formal statement published in Die Welt newspaper in Germany, titled “Wir Juden wissen, wie bitter Flucht ist” (“We Jews Understand What Being a Refugee Means”), Ronald S. Lauder, president of the World Jewish Congress (WJC) and Dr. Josef Schuster, president of the Central Council of Jews in Germany and a vice-president of the WJC, attacked all Germans who oppose the flooding of their country by nonwhites, calling them “neo-Nazis.”

For many years, there were complaints about the country’s [Germany’s] unwillingness to become a country of immigration, and about a lack of a ‘culture of welcome.’ Given what we saw over the last weeks, that’s obviously not the case at all. The Jewish community, both in Germany and worldwide, welcomes this evolution toward an open society. It is the right thing. The two top Jews then went on to demand that the flood of nonwhite invaders be distributed to all European nations:

What is needed now is not only a just allocation to the various countries, but also longer-term support. Winter is around the country, and the refugees need good housing. It won’t suffice to provide them with tents, or pretzels, or teddy bears.

The World Jewish Congress went on to state that “closing Europe’s borders is not the right answer to the refugee crisis.” This was said in an official statement penned by its Deputy CEO for Diplomacy, Maram Stern, in September 2015.

The WJC statement said that it would be “immoral” for Europe to close the borders, and that “Europe needs to act now. Our answer can’t be to close the doors. Not only would it not work, it would be immoral.”

At the same time, however, the Jewish state of Israel—which all these Jewish organization support—has been adamant that it will not allow a single “refugee” to enter its territory.

As reported in the LA Times of September 6, 2015 (“One country that won’t be taking Syrian refugees: Israel”), Israel has absolutely refused to accept a single “refugee”—despite all Jewish organizations in Europe and America being at the forefront of pushing these “refugees” into Europe.

An official statement from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office emphatically stated that Israel’s “lack of demographic and geographic depth” required controlling its borders against both “illegal migrants and terrorism.”

In fact, Israel has also made it illegal for any non-Jew, as racially defined by that state, to immigrate to Israel at all, no matter where they come from.

At the same time, the Israeli government has also financed, through its official foreign aid section (IsraAID), the Third World Muslim invasion of Europe.

According to the IsraAID website, that agency’s “work” in Europe includes an “Advanced Emergency Team” on the ground providing basic medical and psychosocial support to refugees, as well as distributing “much needed emergency items, including baby slings.”

In addition, the IsraAID website says, the Jews have “sent an assessment and relief mission to Serbia and Croatia to determine both the short-term and long-term needs of the refugee population crossing through Europe” and has launched a “Mobile Relief Unit in anticipation of Hungary’s stricter border controls.”

The Jewish hypocrisy could not be clearer: on the one hand, they refuse to let any of these “refugees” into Israel, arguing, quite correctly, that letting in millions of these Muslims will destroy Israel’s racial homogeneity and stability.

However, on the other hand, these same Jews—in Israel and elsewhere—ardently support the importation of millions of Muslim “refugees” into Europe—knowing very well that they will destroy Europe’s racial homogeneity and stability.

Now, as western Europe teeters on the brink, these same Jewish organizations which promoted and pushed the nonwhite invasion, are now demanding that the Muslims pouring into Europe be “educated” into not being “anti-Semitic.”

The Jewish lobby’s behavior makes it clear once again that what they call “anti-Semitism” is only a reaction to Jewish behavior—and that if they stopped acting so duplicitously toward all other peoples, “anti-Semitism” would disappear overnight