Iraq needs 80,000 good troops to retake lost territory: US general

WASHINGTON - Agence France-Presse

U.S. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin Dempsey (R) and Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel testify before the House Armed Services Committee about the ongoing fight against ISIL in the Rayburn House Office Building November 13, 2014 in Washington, DC. AFP Photo

Iraq will need about 80,000 effective military troops to retake the terrain it lost to militants of Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) and restore its border with Syria, the top U.S. general said on Nov. 13."We're going to need about 80,000 competent Iraqi security forces to recapture territory lost, and eventually the city of Mosul, to restore the border," Army General Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of staff, told a congressional hearing.Dempsey said the request for more U.S. forces in Iraq would create centers to help train the additional troops needed.Dempsey also told lawmakers that he would consider sending American military advisers to accompany Iraqi troops if they advance against ISIL militants in the difficult terrain near Mosul and the Iraqi border with Syria.Dempsey said that he had not decided if such a recommendation would be necessary.A spokesman said Dempsey was not referring to sending in ground combat troops to fight militants but was referring to deploying advisers to help call in air strikes, an idea he first raised publicly in September.The general's remarks could stir political concern just days after Obama authorized expanding the number of U.S. troops in Iraq to as many as 3,100 from a current limit of 1,600, adding more advisers as well as troops to train the Iraqi military.Dempsey said he was "certainly considering" sending U.S. advisers to support Iraqi troops. He spoke after members of the Republican-led House Armed Services Committee questioned why Democratic President Barack Obama had ruled out putting combat troops in Iraq and asked the general whether he would recommend greater action."How can you successfully execute the mission you've been given to degrade and ultimately destroy ISIL when some of your best options are taken off the table?" asked Representative Buck McKeon, the committee chairman.McKeon said if Obama sought a new authorization to use military force but ruled out U.S. combat troops, it would not be approved. "I will not support sending our military into harm's way with their arms tied behind their backs," he said.Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel told the panel the U.S.-led air campaign against Islamic State, which has been criticized for the small number of air strikes, would intensify as Iraqi forces strengthened to the point they could go on the offensive.Dempsey and Hagel urged Congress to approve $5.6 billion in additional funding for the campaign.