EU Report: The 'Right To Be Forgotten' Is Technically Impossible... So Let's Do It Anyway

from the just-forget-it dept

Consider Alice viewing Bob’s personal information on a computer screen, while she is allowed to do so (i.e., before Bob has invoked his right to be forgotten). Alice can take a picture of the screen using a camera, take notes or memorize the information. It is technically impossible to prevent Alice from doing so, or even to recognize that she has obtained a copy of Bob’s personal data.

For any reasonable interpretation of the right to be forgotten, a purely technical and comprehensive solution to enforce the right in the open Internet is generally impossible.

A possible pragmatic approach to assist with the enforcement of the right to be forgotten is to require search engine operators and sharing services within the EU to filter references to forgotten information stored inside and outside the EU region.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community. Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis. While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Every few months, it seems, we hear about yet another attempt in Europe to implement the absolutely ridiculous idea of the "right to be forgotten." We wrote about it in 2010 2011 and again earlier this year . It's a silly idea for a variety of reasons. The general idea is that someone, say, who has committed a crime, but is then rehabilitated / served his time / whatever, deserves a "fresh start" and the stories of the crime and punishment should be erased from publications. Europeans who support this wacky idea argue that it's a form of a privacy right. But that's ridiculous. It has nothing to do with "privacy" at all, as thethat someone committed and convicted of a crime is a, not private info. Telling people (and publishers) that they can't talk about factual information, or even leave available factual stories written at the time just seems completely offensive to anyone who believes in the basic idea of free speech.And, of course, there's an even bigger problem. The whole idea isn't just silly and complex, but it's. And it's not just me saying that. As Stewart Baker points out, the European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA) has put out a report making the basic impossibility of a "right to be forgotten" quite clear:They seem to make that clear just by the image they chose to put on the cover of the report That said... given the very admission that this is, you'd think the recommendation would be (perhaps) to find something a little more productive to work on. But, no, that would be wishful thinking. Instead, despite the admission that the whole endeavor is doomed to be a failure for the simple fact that it's impossible, they still discuss ways that it might be implemented. And their ideas? Well, to double down on the impossible with crazy regulations. Take for example, the following two "recommendations" in the final section, one right after the other:Got that? So it's impossible, but let's regulate the hell out of search engines and tell them what they can't link to. Perhaps if they'd stopped after the point at which they determined it was "impossible" we'd all have been better off.

Filed Under: enisa, europe, free speech, impossible, privacy, public information, reporting, right to be forgotten