This article is cited by 126 publications.

Edward J. Griffen, Alexander G. Dossetter, Andrew G. Leach . Chemists: AI Is Here; Unite To Get the Benefits. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2020 , 63 (16) , 8695-8704. 63 (16) , 8695-8704. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00163

Andy H. Vo, Terry R. Van Vleet, Rishi R. Gupta, Michael J. Liguori, Mohan S. Rao . An Overview of Machine Learning and Big Data for Drug Toxicity Evaluation. Chemical Research in Toxicology 2020 , 33 (1) , 20-37. 33 (1) , 20-37. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00227

Toshio Fujita and David A. Winkler . Understanding the Roles of the “Two QSARs”. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2016 , 56 (2) , 269-274. 56 (2) , 269-274. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00229

Xiang-Wei Zhu, Yan-Jun Xin, and Hui-Lin Ge . Recursive Random Forests Enable Better Predictive Performance and Model Interpretation than Variable Selection by LASSO. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2015 , 55 (4) , 736-746. 55 (4) , 736-746. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci500715e

Robert Fraczkiewicz, Mario Lobell, Andreas H. Göller, Ursula Krenz, Rolf Schoenneis, Robert D. Clark, and Alexander Hillisch . Best of Both Worlds: Combining Pharma Data and State of the Art Modeling Technology To Improve in Silico pKa Prediction. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2015 , 55 (2) , 389-397. 55 (2) , 389-397. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci500585w

Mark C. Wenlock and Lars A. Carlsson . How Experimental Errors Influence Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetic QSAR/QSPR Models. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2015 , 55 (1) , 125-134. 55 (1) , 125-134. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci500535s

Ahmed El Kerdawy, Stefan Güssregen, Hans Matter, Matthias Hennemann, and Timothy Clark . Quantum Mechanics-Based Properties for 3D-QSAR. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2013 , 53 (6) , 1486-1502. 53 (6) , 1486-1502. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci400181b

Niels Hansen, Philippe H. Hünenberger, and Wilfred F. van Gunsteren . Efficient Combination of Environment Change and Alchemical Perturbation within the Enveloping Distribution Sampling (EDS) Scheme: Twin-System EDS and Application to the Determination of Octanol–Water Partition Coefficients. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2013 , 9 (3) , 1334-1346. 9 (3) , 1334-1346. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct300933y

Christopher E. Keefer, Gregory W. Kauffman, and Rishi Raj Gupta . Interpretable, Probability-Based Confidence Metric for Continuous Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship Models. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2013 , 53 (2) , 368-383. 53 (2) , 368-383. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci300554t

Satoshi Niijima, Akira Shiraishi, and Yasushi Okuno . Dissecting Kinase Profiling Data to Predict Activity and Understand Cross-Reactivity of Kinase Inhibitors. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2012 , 52 (4) , 901-912. 52 (4) , 901-912. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci200607f

Ying-Ting Lin and Guan-Yu Chen . A Scaffold-Independent Subcellular Event-Based Analysis: Characterization of Significant Structural Modifications. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2012 , 52 (2) , 506-514. 52 (2) , 506-514. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci200540y

Michael C. Hutter . Determining the Degree of Randomness of Descriptors in Linear Regression Equations with Respect to the Data Size. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2011 , 51 (12) , 3099-3104. 51 (12) , 3099-3104. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci200403j

W. Patrick Walters, Jeremy Green, Jonathan R. Weiss, and Mark A. Murcko . What Do Medicinal Chemists Actually Make? A 50-Year Retrospective. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2011 , 54 (19) , 6405-6416. 54 (19) , 6405-6416. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm200504p

Anthony K. Felts, Krystal LaBarge, Joseph D. Bauman, Dishaben V. Patel, Daniel M. Himmel, Eddy Arnold, Michael A. Parniak, and Ronald M. Levy . Identification of Alternative Binding Sites for Inhibitors of HIV-1 Ribonuclease H Through Comparative Analysis of Virtual Enrichment Studies. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2011 , 51 (8) , 1986-1998. 51 (8) , 1986-1998. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci200194w

Dimitris K. Agrafiotis, John J. M. Wiener, Andrew Skalkin, and Jeremy Kolpak . Single R-Group Polymorphisms (SRPs) and R-Cliffs: An Intuitive Framework for Analyzing and Visualizing Activity Cliffs in a Single Analog Series. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2011 , 51 (5) , 1122-1131. 51 (5) , 1122-1131. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci200054u

Jianping Huang and Xiaohui Fan . Why QSAR Fails: An Empirical Evaluation Using Conventional Computational Approach. Molecular Pharmaceutics 2011 , 8 (2) , 600-608. 8 (2) , 600-608. https://doi.org/10.1021/mp100423u

Cristina Dezi, Andrea Carotti, Matteo Magnani, Massimo Baroni, Alessandro Padova, Gabriele Cruciani, Antonio Macchiarulo and Roberto Pellicciari . Molecular Interaction Fields and 3D-QSAR Studies of p53−MDM2 Inhibitors Suggest Additional Features of Ligand−Target Interaction. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2010 , 50 (8) , 1451-1465. 50 (8) , 1451-1465. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci100113p

Denis Fourches, Eugene Muratov and Alexander Tropsha . Trust, But Verify: On the Importance of Chemical Structure Curation in Cheminformatics and QSAR Modeling Research. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2010 , 50 (7) , 1189-1204. 50 (7) , 1189-1204. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci100176x

Jesus Seco, F. Javier Luque and Xavier Barril. Binding Site Detection and Druggability Index from First Principles. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2009 , 52 (8) , 2363-2371. 52 (8) , 2363-2371. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm801385d

M. Paul Gleeson and Duangkamol Gleeson . QM/MM Calculations in Drug Discovery: A Useful Method for Studying Binding Phenomena?. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2009 , 49 (3) , 670-677. 49 (3) , 670-677. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci800419j

Jose L. Medina-Franco, Karina Martínez-Mayorga, Andreas Bender, Ray M. Marín, Marc A. Giulianotti, Clemencia Pinilla and Richard A. Houghten . Characterization of Activity Landscapes Using 2D and 3D Similarity Methods: Consensus Activity Cliffs. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2009 , 49 (2) , 477-491. 49 (2) , 477-491. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci800379q

Richard D. Cramer, Phillip Cruz, Gunther Stahl, William C. Curtiss, Brian Campbell, Brian B. Masek and Farhad Soltanshahi. Virtual Screening for R-Groups, including Predicted pIC50 Contributions, within Large Structural Databases, Using Topomer CoMFA. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2008 , 48 (11) , 2180-2195. 48 (11) , 2180-2195. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci8001556

Antonio Macchiarulo, Antimo Gioiello, Charles Thomas, Alberto Massarotti, Roberto Nuti, Emiliano Rosatelli, Paola Sabbatini, Kristina Schoonjans, Johan Auwerx and Roberto Pellicciari . Molecular Field Analysis and 3D-Quantitative Structure−Activity Relationship Study (MFA 3D-QSAR) Unveil Novel Features of Bile Acid Recognition at TGR5. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2008 , 48 (9) , 1792-1801. 48 (9) , 1792-1801. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci800196h

Svetoslav Slavov, Richard D. Beger. Quantitative structure–toxicity relationships in translational toxicology. Current Opinion in Toxicology 2020 , 23-24 , 46-49. 23-24 , 46-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cotox.2020.04.002

Lee A. Griffin, Iaroslav Gaponenko, Nazanin Bassiri‐Gharb. Better, Faster, and Less Biased Machine Learning: Electromechanical Switching in Ferroelectric Thin Films. Advanced Materials 2020 , 32 (38) , 2002425. 32 (38) , 2002425. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202002425

Andrey A. Toropov, Alla P. Toropova. QSPR/QSAR: State-of-Art, Weirdness, the Future. Molecules 2020 , 25 (6) , 1292. 25 (6) , 1292. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25061292

Jonathan Schmidt, Mário R. G. Marques, Silvana Botti, Miguel A. L. Marques. Recent advances and applications of machine learning in solid-state materials science. npj Computational Materials 2019 , 5 (1) 5 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-019-0221-0

Andrey A. Toropov, Alla P. Toropova. QSAR as a random event: criteria of predictive potential for a chance model. Structural Chemistry 2019 , 30 (5) , 1677-1683. 30 (5) , 1677-1683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-019-01361-6

Alla P. Toropova, Andrey A. Toropov. Does the Index of Ideality of Correlation Detect the Better Model Correctly?. Molecular Informatics 2019 , 38 (8-9) , 1800157. 38 (8-9) , 1800157. https://doi.org/10.1002/minf.201800157

Alla P. Toropova, Andrey A. Toropov. Quasi-SMILES: quantitative structure–activity relationships to predict anticancer activity. Molecular Diversity 2019 , 23 (2) , 403-412. 23 (2) , 403-412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11030-018-9881-9

Andrey A. Toropov, Alla P. Toropova. Use of the index of ideality of correlation to improve predictive potential for biochemical endpoints. Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods 2019 , 29 (1) , 43-52. 29 (1) , 43-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376516.2018.1506851

Geven Piir, Iiris Kahn, Alfonso T. García-Sosa, Sulev Sild, Priit Ahte, Uko Maran. Best Practices for QSAR Model Reporting: Physical and Chemical Properties, Ecotoxicity, Environmental Fate, Human Health, and Toxicokinetics Endpoints. Environmental Health Perspectives 2018 , 126 (12) , 126001. 126 (12) , 126001. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP3264

Yan Li, Gabriel Idakwo, Sundar Thangapandian, Minjun Chen, Huixiao Hong, Chaoyang Zhang, Ping Gong. Target-specific toxicity knowledgebase (TsTKb): a novel toolkit for in silico predictive toxicology. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part C 2018 , 36 (4) , 219-236. 36 (4) , 219-236. https://doi.org/10.1080/10590501.2018.1537148

Alexander L. Perryman, Jimmy S. Patel, Riccardo Russo, Eric Singleton, Nancy Connell, Sean Ekins, Joel S. Freundlich. Naïve Bayesian Models for Vero Cell Cytotoxicity. Pharmaceutical Research 2018 , 35 (9) 35 (9) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-018-2439-9

Ann E. Cleves, Ajay N. Jain. Quantitative surface field analysis: learning causal models to predict ligand binding affinity and pose. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design 2018 , 32 (7) , 731-757. 32 (7) , 731-757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-018-0126-x

Michael C Hutter. The current limits in virtual screening and property prediction. Future Medicinal Chemistry 2018 , 10 (13) , 1623-1635. 10 (13) , 1623-1635. https://doi.org/10.4155/fmc-2017-0303

Linlin Zhao, Hao Zhu. Big Data in Computational Toxicology: Challenges and Opportunities. 2018 ,,, 291-312. ,, 291-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119282594.ch11

Probir Kumar Ojha, Kunal Roy. PLS regression-based chemometric modeling of odorant properties of diverse chemical constituents of black tea and coffee. RSC Advances 2018 , 8 (5) , 2293-2304. 8 (5) , 2293-2304. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA12914A

Lu Zhang, Jianjun Tan, Dan Han, Hao Zhu. From machine learning to deep learning: progress in machine intelligence for rational drug discovery. Drug Discovery Today 2017 , 22 (11) , 1680-1685. 22 (11) , 1680-1685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2017.08.010

Vijay H. Masand, Vesna Rastija. PyDescriptor : A new PyMOL plugin for calculating thousands of easily understandable molecular descriptors. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2017 , 169 , 12-18. 169 , 12-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2017.08.003

Igor V. Tetko, Uko Maran, Alexander Tropsha. Public (Q)SAR Services, Integrated Modeling Environments, and Model Repositories on the Web: State of the Art and Perspectives for Future Development. Molecular Informatics 2017 , 36 (3) , 1600082. 36 (3) , 1600082. https://doi.org/10.1002/minf.201600082

Alexander Golbraikh, Xiang Simon Wang, Hao Zhu, Alexander Tropsha. Predictive QSAR Modeling: Methods and Applications in Drug Discovery and Chemical Risk Assessment. 2017 ,,, 2303-2340. ,, 2303-2340. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27282-5_37

Watshara Shoombuatong, Philip Prathipati, Wiwat Owasirikul, Apilak Worachartcheewan, Saw Simeon, Nuttapat Anuwongcharoen, Jarl E. S. Wikberg, Chanin Nantasenamat. Towards the Revival of Interpretable QSAR Models. 2017 ,,, 3-55. ,, 3-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56850-8_1

Mabrouk Hamadache, Abdeltif Amrane, Othmane Benkortbi, Salah Hanini, Latifa Khaouane, Cherif Si Moussa. Environmental Toxicity of Pesticides, and Its Modeling by QSAR Approaches. 2017 ,,, 471-501. ,, 471-501. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56850-8_13

John C. Dearden. The Use of Topological Indices in QSAR and QSPR Modeling. 2017 ,,, 57-88. ,, 57-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56850-8_2

R.A. Lewis, F. Sirockin. 2/3D Pharmacophore Definitions and Their Application. 2017 ,,, 189-220. ,, 189-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409547-2.12346-7

Lu Xu, Hai-Yan Fu, Qiao-Bo Yin, Yao Fan, Mohammad Goodarzi, Yuan-Bin She. Interpretable linear and nonlinear quantitative structure-selectivity relationship (QSSR) modeling of a biomimetic catalytic system by particle swarm optimization based sparse regression. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2016 , 159 , 187-195. 159 , 187-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2016.10.016

Peter V. Coveney, Edward R. Dougherty, Roger R. Highfield. Big data need big theory too. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 2016 , 374 (2080) , 20160153. 374 (2080) , 20160153. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0153

Natalia Sizochenko, Agnieszka Gajewicz, Jerzy Leszczynski, Tomasz Puzyn. Causation or only correlation? Application of causal inference graphs for evaluating causality in nano-QSAR models. Nanoscale 2016 , 8 (13) , 7203-7208. 8 (13) , 7203-7208. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NR08279J

Kathryn Ribay, Marlene T. Kim, Wenyi Wang, Daniel Pinolini, Hao Zhu. Predictive Modeling of Estrogen Receptor Binding Agents Using Advanced Cheminformatics Tools and Massive Public Data. Frontiers in Environmental Science 2016 , 4 https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00012

Alexander Golbraikh, Xiang Simon Wang, Hao Zhu, Alexander Tropsha. Predictive QSAR Modeling: Methods and Applications in Drug Discovery and Chemical Risk Assessment. 2016 ,,, 1-38. ,, 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6169-8_37-2

Alexander Golbraikh, Xiang S. Wang, Hao Zhu, Alexander Tropsha. Predictive QSAR Modeling: Methods and Applications in Drug Discovery and Chemical Risk Assessment. 2016 ,,, 1-48. ,, 1-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6169-8_37-3

Tao Wang, Mian-Bin Wu, Jian-Ping Lin, Li-Rong Yang. Quantitative structure–activity relationship: promising advances in drug discovery platforms. Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery 2015 , 10 (12) , 1283-1300. 10 (12) , 1283-1300. https://doi.org/10.1517/17460441.2015.1083006

John C. Dearden, Philip H. Rowe. Use of Artificial Neural Networks in the QSAR Prediction of Physicochemical Properties and Toxicities for REACH Legislation. 2015 ,,, 65-88. ,, 65-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2239-0_5

Paulo Paixão, Natália Aniceto, Luís F. Gouveia, José A. G. Morais. Prediction of Drug Distribution in Rat and Humans Using an Artificial Neural Networks Ensemble and a PBPK Model. Pharmaceutical Research 2014 , 31 (12) , 3313-3322. 31 (12) , 3313-3322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-014-1421-4

Pier G. De Benedetti, Francesca Fanelli. Multiscale quantum chemical approaches to QSAR modeling and drug design. Drug Discovery Today 2014 , 19 (12) , 1921-1927. 19 (12) , 1921-1927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2014.09.024

Richard A. Lewis, David Wood. Modern 2D QSAR for drug discovery. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science 2014 , 4 (6) , 505-522. 4 (6) , 505-522. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1187

P. Ganga Raju Achary. Simplified molecular input line entry system-based optimal descriptors: QSAR modelling for voltage-gated potassium channel subunit Kv7.2. SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research 2014 , 25 (1) , 73-90. 25 (1) , 73-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062936X.2013.842930

Anders E. G. Lindgren, Andreas Larsson, Anna Linusson, Mikael Elofsson. Statistical Molecular Design: A Tool to Follow Up Hits from Small-Molecule Screening. 2014 ,,, 169-188. ,, 169-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-592-7_17

Ying-Ting Lin. A tandem regression-outlier analysis of a ligand cellular system for key structural modifications around ligand binding. Journal of Cheminformatics 2013 , 5 (1) 5 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-2946-5-21

Hans Matter, Stefan Güssregen, Friedemann Schmidt, Gerhard Hessler, Thorsten Naumann, Karl-Heinz Baringhaus. EXPLORATION OF STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIPS (SARs) AND TRANSFER OF KEY ELEMENTS IN LEAD OPTIMIZATION. 2013 ,,, 205-243. ,, 205-243. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118742785.ch10

José L. Medina-Franco, Gerald M. Maggiora. MOLECULAR SIMILARITY ANALYSIS. 2013 ,,, 343-399. ,, 343-399. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118742785.ch15

Laura K. E. Hardebeck, Charles A. Johnson, Graham A. Hudson, Yi Ren, Michelle Watt, Charles C. Kirkpatrick, Brent M. Znosko, Michael Lewis. Predicting DNA-intercalator binding: the development of an arene-arene stacking parameter from SAPT analysis of benzene-substituted benzene complexes. Journal of Physical Organic Chemistry 2013 , 26 (11) , 879-884. 26 (11) , 879-884. https://doi.org/10.1002/poc.3184

Christopher D. Ruark, C. Eric Hack, Peter J. Robinson, Paul E. Anderson, Jeffery M. Gearhart. Quantitative structure–activity relationships for organophosphates binding to acetylcholinesterase. Archives of Toxicology 2013 , 87 (2) , 281-289. 87 (2) , 281-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-012-0934-z

Jianping Huang, Xiaohui Fan. Reliably assessing prediction reliability for high dimensional QSAR data. Molecular Diversity 2013 , 17 (1) , 63-73. 17 (1) , 63-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11030-012-9415-9

Hao Zhu. From QSAR to QSIIR: Searching for Enhanced Computational Toxicology Models. 2013 ,,, 53-65. ,, 53-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-059-5_3

Paola Gramatica, Stefano Cassani, Partha Pratim Roy, Simona Kovarich, Chun Wei Yap, Ester Papa. QSAR Modeling is not “Push a Button and Find a Correlation”: A Case Study of Toxicity of (Benzo-)triazoles on Algae. Molecular Informatics 2012 , 31 (11-12) , 817-835. 31 (11-12) , 817-835. https://doi.org/10.1002/minf.201200075

Workalemahu M. Berhanu, Girinath G. Pillai, Alexander A. Oliferenko, Alan R. Katritzky. Quantitative Structure-Activity/Property Relationships: The Ubiquitous Links between Cause and Effect. ChemPlusChem 2012 , 77 (7) , 507-517. 77 (7) , 507-517. https://doi.org/10.1002/cplu.201200038

Gerald F. Thomas. The emancipation of chemistry. Foundations of Chemistry 2012 , 14 (2) , 109-155. 14 (2) , 109-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-011-9118-9

Honey, Suresh Thareja, Manoj Kumar, V.R. Sinha. Self-organizing molecular field analysis of NSAIDs: Assessment of pharmacokinetic and physicochemical properties using 3D-QSPkR approach. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2012 , 53 , 76-82. 53 , 76-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2012.03.037

Nuno M. Garrido, Ioannis G. Economou, António J. Queimada, Miguel Jorge, Eugénia A. Macedo. Prediction of the n -hexane/water and 1-octanol/water partition coefficients for environmentally relevant compounds using molecular simulation. AIChE Journal 2012 , 58 (6) , 1929-1938. 58 (6) , 1929-1938. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.12718

Nripen S. Sharma, Rohit Jindal, Bhaskar Mitra, Serom Lee, Lulu Li, Tim J. Maguire, Rene Schloss, Martin L. Yarmush. Perspectives on Non-Animal Alternatives for Assessing Sensitization Potential in Allergic Contact Dermatitis. Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering 2012 , 5 (1) , 52-72. 5 (1) , 52-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-011-0189-4

Robert D. Combes. In Silico Methods for Toxicity Prediction. 2012 ,,, 96-116. ,, 96-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3055-1_7

John C. Dearden. Prediction of Physicochemical Properties. 2012 ,,, 93-138. ,, 93-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-050-2_6

Alexander Tropsha. Recent Trends in Statistical QSAR Modeling of Environmental Chemical Toxicity. 2012 ,,, 381-411. ,, 381-411. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8340-4_13

Alexander Golbraikh, Xiang Simon Wang, Hao Zhu, Alexander Tropsha. Predictive QSAR Modeling: Methods and Applications in Drug Discovery and Chemical Risk Assessment. 2012 ,,, 1309-1342. ,, 1309-1342. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0711-5_37

Richard D. Cramer. The inevitable QSAR renaissance. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design 2012 , 26 (1) , 35-38. 26 (1) , 35-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-011-9495-0

Ajay N. Jain, Ann E. Cleves. Does your model weigh the same as a Duck?. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design 2012 , 26 (1) , 57-67. 26 (1) , 57-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-011-9530-1

Luis G Valerio. In silicotoxicology models and databases as FDA Critical Path Initiative toolkits. Human Genomics 2011 , 5 (3) 5 (3) https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-7364-5-3-200

A.A. Toropov, A.P. Toropova, S.E. Martyanov, E. Benfenati, G.Gini, D. Leszczynska, J. Leszczynski. Comparison of SMILES and molecular graphs as the representation of the molecular structure for QSAR analysis for mutagenic potential of polyaromatic amines. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2011 , 109 (1) , 94-100. 109 (1) , 94-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2011.07.008

Hironori Kokubo, Toshimasa Tanaka, Yuko Okamoto. Ab Initio prediction of protein–ligand binding structures by replica‐exchange umbrella sampling simulations. Journal of Computational Chemistry 2011 , 32 (13) , 2810-2821. 32 (13) , 2810-2821. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21860

A. P. Toropova, A. A. Toropov, E. Benfenati, G. Gini, D. Leszczynska, J. Leszczynski. CORAL: Quantitative structure-activity relationship models for estimating toxicity of organic compounds in rats. Journal of Computational Chemistry 2011 , 32 (12) , 2727-2733. 32 (12) , 2727-2733. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21848

Robert D Combes. Challenges for computational structure–activity modelling for predicting chemical toxicity: future improvements?. Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology 2011 , 7 (9) , 1129-1140. 7 (9) , 1129-1140. https://doi.org/10.1517/17425255.2011.602066

Emilio Benfenati, Andrey A. Toropov, Alla P. Toropova, Alberto Manganaro, Rodolfo Gonella Diaza. coral Software: QSAR for Anticancer Agents. Chemical Biology & Drug Design 2011 , 77 (6) , 471-476. 77 (6) , 471-476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-0285.2011.01117.x

Thomas Hartung. From alternative methods to a new toxicology. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 2011 , 77 (3) , 338-349. 77 (3) , 338-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2010.12.027

E. A. Smolenskii, I. V. Chuvaeva, A. L. Lapidus. Digital chemistry: Molecular numbers and digital indices of chemical reactions. Doklady Chemistry 2011 , 437 (2) , 116-119. 437 (2) , 116-119. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0012500811040100

Richard D. Cramer. Rethinking 3D-QSAR. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design 2011 , 25 (3) , 197-201. 25 (3) , 197-201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-010-9403-z

Gerald M. Maggiora, Veerabahu Shanmugasundaram. Molecular Similarity Measures. 2011 ,,, 39-100. ,, 39-100. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-839-3_2

Nuno M. Garrido, Miguel Jorge, António J. Queimada, Eugénia A. Macedo, Ioannis G. Economou. Using molecular simulation to predict solute solvation and partition coefficients in solvents of different polarity. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2011 , 13 (20) , 9155. 13 (20) , 9155. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1cp20110g

A. A. Toropov, A. P. Toropova, E. Benfenati, A. Manganaro. QSAR modelling of the toxicity to Tetrahymena pyriformis by balance of correlations. Molecular Diversity 2010 , 14 (4) , 821-827. 14 (4) , 821-827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11030-009-9186-0

Ajay N. Jain. QMOD: physically meaningful QSAR. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design 2010 , 24 (10) , 865-878. 24 (10) , 865-878. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-010-9379-8

Pier G. De Benedetti, Francesca Fanelli. Computational quantum chemistry and adaptive ligand modeling in mechanistic QSAR. Drug Discovery Today 2010 , 15 (19-20) , 859-866. 15 (19-20) , 859-866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2010.08.003

Alexander Tropsha. Recent Advances in Development, Validation, and Exploitation of QSAR Models. 2010 ,,https://doi.org/10.1002/0471266949.bmc002.pub2

Alexander Tropsha. Best Practices for QSAR Model Development, Validation, and Exploitation. Molecular Informatics 2010 , 29 (6-7) , 476-488. 29 (6-7) , 476-488. https://doi.org/10.1002/minf.201000061

Ying Dong, Bingren Xiang, Teng Wang, Hao Liu, Lingbo Qu. Rough set-based SAR analysis: An inductive method. Expert Systems with Applications 2010 , 37 (7) , 5032-5039. 37 (7) , 5032-5039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.12.008

Russell T Naven, Shirley Louise-May, Nigel Greene. The computational prediction of genotoxicity. Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology 2010 , 6 (7) , 797-807. 6 (7) , 797-807. https://doi.org/10.1517/17425255.2010.495118

Chanin Nantasenamat, Chartchalerm Isarankura-Na-Ayudhya, Virapong Prachayasittikul. Advances in computational methods to predict the biological activity of compounds. Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery 2010 , 5 (7) , 633-654. 5 (7) , 633-654. https://doi.org/10.1517/17460441.2010.492827

R. D. Combes. Is computational toxicology withering on the vine?. Archives of Toxicology 2010 , 84 (4) , 333-336. 84 (4) , 333-336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-010-0528-6

A. A. Toropov, A. P. Toropova, E. Benfenati, D. Leszczynska, J. Leszczynski. QSAR analysis of 1,4-dihydro-4-oxo-1-(2-thiazolyl)-1,8-naphthyridines exhibiting anticancer activity by optimal SMILES-based descriptors. Journal of Mathematical Chemistry 2010 , 47 (2) , 647-666. 47 (2) , 647-666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10910-009-9593-6

Wendy A. Warr. Some Trends in Chem(o)informatics. 2010 ,,, 1-37. ,, 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-839-3_1

Peter Gedeck, Christian Kramer, Peter Ertl. Computational Analysis of Structure–Activity Relationships. 2010 ,,, 113-160. ,, 113-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6468(10)49004-9

Dragan Amić, Bono Lučić. Reliability of bond dissociation enthalpy calculated by the PM6 method and experimental TEAC values in antiradical QSAR of flavonoids. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry 2010 , 18 (1) , 28-35. 18 (1) , 28-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2009.11.015

Ricardo A. Mata. Application of high level wavefunction methods in quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics hybrid schemes. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2010 , 12 (19) , 5041. 12 (19) , 5041. https://doi.org/10.1039/b918608e

Benson M Spowage, Craig L Bruce, Jonathan D Hirst. Interpretable correlation descriptors for quantitative structure-activity relationships. Journal of Cheminformatics 2009 , 1 (1) 1 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-2946-1-22

Axel J. Soto, Rocío L. Cecchini, Gustavo E. Vazquez, Ignacio Ponzoni. Multi-Objective Feature Selection in QSAR Using a Machine Learning Approach. QSAR & Combinatorial Science 2009 , 28 (11-12) , 1509-1523. 28 (11-12) , 1509-1523. https://doi.org/10.1002/qsar.200960053

C. Anthony Hunt, Glen E. P. Ropella, Tai Ning Lam, Jonathan Tang, Sean H. J. Kim, Jesse A. Engelberg, Shahab Sheikh-Bahaei. At the Biological Modeling and Simulation Frontier. Pharmaceutical Research 2009 , 26 (11) , 2369-2400. 26 (11) , 2369-2400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-009-9958-3

Kai Lüder, Lennart Lindfors, Jan Westergren, Sture Nordholm, Rasmus Persson, Mikaela Pedersen. In silico prediction of drug solubility: 4. Will simple potentials suffice?. Journal of Computational Chemistry 2009 , 30 (12) , 1859-1871. 30 (12) , 1859-1871. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21173

A. A. Toropov, A. P. Toropova, E. Benfenati, A. Manganaro. QSAR modelling of carcinogenicity by balance of correlations. Molecular Diversity 2009 , 13 (3) , 367-373. 13 (3) , 367-373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11030-009-9113-4

Noslen Hernández, Rudolf Kiralj, Márcia M.C. Ferreira, Isneri Talavera. Critical comparative analysis, validation and interpretation of SVM and PLS regression models in a QSAR study on HIV-1 protease inhibitors. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2009 , 98 (1) , 65-77. 98 (1) , 65-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2009.04.012

Hao Zhu, Lin Ye, Ann Richard, Alexander Golbraikh, Fred A. Wright, Ivan Rusyn, Alexander Tropsha. A Novel Two-Step Hierarchical Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship Modeling Work Flow for Predicting Acute Toxicity of Chemicals in Rodents. Environmental Health Perspectives 2009 , 117 (8) , 1257-1264. 117 (8) , 1257-1264. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0800471

Miklos Feher, Todd Ewing. Global or Local QSAR: Is There a Way Out?. QSAR & Combinatorial Science 2009 , 28 (8) , 850-855. 28 (8) , 850-855. https://doi.org/10.1002/qsar.200860186

Jürgen Bajorath, Lisa Peltason, Mathias Wawer, Rajarshi Guha, Michael S. Lajiness, John H. Van Drie. Navigating structure–activity landscapes. Drug Discovery Today 2009 , 14 (13-14) , 698-705. 14 (13-14) , 698-705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2009.04.003

Lisa Peltason, Jürgen Bajorath. Systematic computational analysis of structure–activity relationships: concepts, challenges and recent advances. Future Medicinal Chemistry 2009 , 1 (3) , 451-466. 1 (3) , 451-466. https://doi.org/10.4155/fmc.09.41

Liang Xu, Xicheng Wang, Weijie Zhao. Bridging the gap between molecular descriptors and mechanism: Cases studies by molecular dynamics simulations. Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling 2009 , 27 (7) , 829-835. 27 (7) , 829-835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmgm.2008.12.007

J.C. Dearden, M.T.D. Cronin, K.L.E. Kaiser. How not to develop a quantitative structure–activity or structure–property relationship (QSAR/QSPR). SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research 2009 , 20 (3-4) , 241-266. 20 (3-4) , 241-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/10629360902949567

Dragan Amić, Bono Lučić, Goran Kovačević, Nenad Trinajstić. Bond dissociation enthalpies calculated by the PM3 method confirm activity cliffs in radical scavenging of flavonoids. Molecular Diversity 2009 , 13 (1) , 27-36. 13 (1) , 27-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11030-008-9095-7

John Delaney. Modelling iterative compound optimisation using a self-avoiding walk. Drug Discovery Today 2009 , 14 (3-4) , 198-207. 14 (3-4) , 198-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2008.10.007

Andrey A. Toropov, Alla P. Toropova, Emilio Benfenati, Danuta Leszczynska, Jerzy Leszczynski. SMILES-based optimal descriptors: QSAR analysis of fullerene-based HIV-1 PR inhibitors by means of balance of correlations. Journal of Computational Chemistry 2009 , 18 , NA-NA. 18 , NA-NA. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21333

Guillaume Fayet, Laurent Joubert, Patricia Rotureau, Carlo Adamo. On the use of descriptors arising from the conceptual density functional theory for the prediction of chemicals explosibility. Chemical Physics Letters 2009 , 467 (4-6) , 407-411. 467 (4-6) , 407-411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2008.11.033

Andrew G. Leach, Rebecca Cann, Simone Tomasi. Reaction energies computed with density functional theory correspond with a whole organism effect; modelling the Ames test for mutagenicity. Chemical Communications 2009 , 283 (9) , 1094. 283 (9) , 1094. https://doi.org/10.1039/b818744d

Xinliang Yu, Bing Yi, Xueye Wang. Quantitative structure–property relationships for the reactivity parameters of acrylate monomers. European Polymer Journal 2008 , 44 (12) , 3997-4001. 44 (12) , 3997-4001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.09.028

Andrew M. Davis, Pierre Bruneau. In Silico Prediction of Solubility. 2008 ,,, 53-68. ,, 53-68. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527623860.ch4

Rajarshi Guha. On the interpretation and interpretability of quantitative structure–activity relationship models. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design 2008 , https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-008-9240-5

Jordi Vallverdú. An Epistemological Analysis of QSPR/QSAR Models. ,,, 1326-1341. ,, 1326-1341. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-5125-8.ch061