Download raw source

Delivered-To: john.podesta@gmail.com Received: by 10.25.43.68 with SMTP id r65csp833557lfr; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:26:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.93.139 with SMTP id d11mr14907436qge.83.1444944370057; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:26:10 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <slatham@hillaryclinton.com> Received: from mail-qk0-x22c.google.com (mail-qk0-x22c.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22c]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n78si12782291qkl.26.2015.10.15.14.26.09 for <john.podesta@gmail.com> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:26:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of slatham@hillaryclinton.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22c as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22c; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of slatham@hillaryclinton.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22c as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=slatham@hillaryclinton.com; dkim=pass header.i=@hillaryclinton.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=hillaryclinton.com Received: by mail-qk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id t68so36121744qkh.3 for <john.podesta@gmail.com>; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:26:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hillaryclinton.com; s=google; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=18Af0k+lvp/6wxexiOqGV9agS56rdqFCsq54qCBagSs=; b=QZlJoR114TZP+F/QDvkR/6wtTvucTEildI/IJlP3vpro57g4WCWvwPKD/Kmm+VswuI PmnqPxFD3O4OHY6YOvjGf7TqM03IA/3PskeW1Em4dWqyhIpaAi/0P5Oxx29Ed40+eu23 aM4lReGSJefE9SCyHgLqeVNRpDjuIYLu/uJeI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=18Af0k+lvp/6wxexiOqGV9agS56rdqFCsq54qCBagSs=; b=L+3f1nhbc0SH7M0V9NB/vyJ6e9gSUMDDeCWl0bc/Dfes9ZR/2ohhMxSD+OyKgab0sr SPx6CDopF8KMetTQWzOKPrjFMzRWSWs/umrPm3f9w/RYjVQ+7vd0/S+Utw95coiVj+VV 9COmH+zd4TEvadZsl91CSWJ4ebR8mdFI/ETkQqag4I47cpm00oAxIYzUntbMnhiUjmdy 6i4XLNsX/W+XrHemMs+RxILcA6RIpm2EZINayyuUlGPE4v5b7dMgk0piircYWvfnZBOi umMryAX6oQsz/ZdXlq67uUICm/YtmW/naNfMVMQSyK+mG7icAj+6Vxbrdrm77JN0mgXY KAhQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQld72jkBtrTPo6/Bs70mYSZYSNH0UsLghMNoFYBloGQ/YZfWF8uoWMn8GMKLQmQpTTDNote MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.55.25.105 with SMTP id k102mr10134977qkh.65.1444944369785; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:26:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.20.195 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:26:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 17:26:09 -0400 Message-ID: <CANvypvCBf+ZyVO_srYvENuq0kaurYhjigf2eZKdD=16xe4SmKQ@mail.gmail.com> Subject: 4 points From: Sara Latham <slatham@hillaryclinton.com> To: Cheryl Mills <cheryl.mills@gmail.com>, John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1147ab98e1b8e505222b53cd --001a1147ab98e1b8e505222b53cd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 1) this is exploiting the tragic deaths of 4 Americans knowing that there can't be zero tolerance for risk just as soldiers go out there and may get shot, so do diplomats they're exploiting something we should be learning from - honoring the commitment of those people, etc. this is political exploitation of that (Benghazi) 2) she was an accountable Secretary of State, who drove hard decisions knowing that again, there's risks but you have to make good judgements about difficult matters she had good instincts on foreign policy (Libya, Middle East Isis) 3) email was cocked up - but is being exploited for political gain she's taken responsibility and will take questions it's a partisan diversion / never-ending but now it's for others to make their judgements on should have Dems in full throated attack against the Rep. on that (emails) 4) it's over - we're done now. what are we trying to accomplish in the opening and in the set up? what do we want HRC to do? what do we want Members to do? --001a1147ab98e1b8e505222b53cd Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr">1) this is exploiting the tragic deaths of 4 Americans<div= >knowing that there can't be zero tolerance for risk</div><div>just as = soldiers go out there and may get shot, so do diplomats</div><div>they'= re exploiting something we should be learning from - honoring the commitmen= t of those people, etc.</div><div>this is political exploitation of that</d= iv><div>(Benghazi)</div><div><br></div><div>2) she was an accountable Secre= tary of State, who drove hard decisions</div><div>knowing that again, there= 's risks but you have to make good judgements about difficult matters</= div><div>she had good instincts on foreign policy</div><div>(Libya, Middle = East Isis)</div><div><br></div><div>3) email was cocked up - but is being e= xploited for political gain</div><div>she's taken responsibility and wi= ll take questions</div><div>it's a partisan diversion / never-ending</d= iv><div>but now it's for others to make their judgements on</div><div>s= hould have Dems in full throated attack against the Rep. on that</div><div>= (emails)<br></div><div><br></div><div>4) it's over - we're done now= .</div><div><br></div><div>what are we trying to accomplish in the opening = and in the set up?</div><div>what do we want HRC to do?</div><div>what do w= e want Members to do?</div><div><br></div></div> --001a1147ab98e1b8e505222b53cd--