It’s important to have a good overview of the various factions that are compatible with militant and non-militant ultra-nationalism.



I previously discussed political dimensions, which is a confusing subject because political dimensions tend to blur into each other. Based on a line of thought that embraces hereditarianism, realism, and rationalism it’s possible to create a political platform that most European Nationalists can support.

1. The rejection of supremacism because it’s an irrational position. Though the White race is accomplished, this doesn’t make every White individual deserving, or undeserving for that matter.



European indigenous rights are of course strongly supported, as well as the indigenous rights of all other races, including the right of Jews to Israel as their ancestral homeland.



2. The rejection of the oppression of homosexuals. This because those who want homosexuals back in the closet support a Marxist form of social engineering. Like people who are blind or deaf, homosexuals deserve to not be ridiculed for their disability.



Most homosexuals do support multiculturalism, but there are notable examples of homosexuals who support European indigenous rights after radicalizing under the threat of Islam.



3. The rejection of the multiracial and multicultural society because it’s impossible to preserve our cultural heritage without our racial heritage. Europeans won’t become minorities in their own nations.



The ultimate consequence of a multiracial society can be witnessed in modern day South Africa. South Africa used to have a White majority two hundred years ago, nowadays South African Whites have been turned into a disarmed slave class living under Marxist rule.



4. The Counter Jihad movement typically doesn’t support European indigenous rights and views Islam as a threat to the multicultural experiment. The Counter Jihad movement should not be confused with the European indigenous rights movement. Alliances should be made with ultra-Zionists who support Jewish as well as European indigenous rights.



5. This doesn’t mean that there shouldn’t be cooperation with White Supremacists, Homophobes, Anti-Semites, or Counter Jihadists. It’s impossible to get everyone to agree on every issue, but nationalists should set aside their differences as we all support a common cause, namely to avoid the genocide of the European people.





Anti-feminists



This will be a group that desires the end of feminism and the return of patriarchism. Breivik suggests that men be given custody in the case of a divorce. Alternatively the laws that force men to pay child support can be repealed.



Conservatives



Conservatism is problematic because conservatives tend to have a rigid hierarchy of authority making them very resistant to change. As such conservatives have attitudes that go back 50-100 years, and ultra-conservatives have attitudes that go back 100-200 years.



It’s not always clear what these attitudes are, some conservatives will have compatible attitudes, some will not. Conservatives tend to reject anything new and different, and this rigid hierarchy of authority can make conservatives difficult allies. A few conservatives are likely to appoint Breivik as their divine leader and wait for further instructions, which of course will never come because Breivik is in jail under strict censorship. Meanwhile these conservatives will reject everyone who isn’t a puritan, or is viewed as a danger to Breivik’s authority.

This is not an attack on conservatives, as without conservatism there would be no hierarchy, and without a hierarchy there would be no culture, just a random selection of opinions and attitudes. If a culture was viewed as an organism, conservatism would be its DNA, designed to evolve slowly but surely through natural selection. Like all products of natural selection, a culture’s main purpose is not only to make it’s people thrive, but to make it’s people survive.

The question is whether the current conservative culture is capable of meeting the current challenge, and failing that, if the ultra-conservative culture is capable of doing so. Looking at European history it becomes obvious that Europe has been in a downward spiral ever since the enlightenment, though there are positive aspects as well.



Traditional Nordic Christianity was most likely a combination of Odinism and the New Testament, over time Odinism was eradicated and replaced with the Old Testament. The enlightenment, a period in which the Bible was translated and became widely available to the masses, resulted in a radical new interpretation of Christianity which inspired the liberal, egalitarian and humanist movements which dominate the political landscape today.



In theory it is possible for Nordic Conservatives to mix Odinism and Christianity to create a hybrid that can be described as Crusader Christianity. This would be an attempt to rediscover the roots of Germanic Christianity, which would make it a form of ultra-conservatism. Breivik researched the Viking era as he carved the names of Norse gods into his guns using the rune script, and he considers Odinism an important part of his cultural identity and heritage.



Alternatively hereditarianism can be embraced with a stronger emphasis on realism and rationalism. Breivik partially adopted this strategy by using meditation to overcome his fear and become a cold and merciless opponent.



In 2083 in chapter 3.149 – The Bible and self-defence – Breivik gives an overview of the most radical elements of the Bible, and this is definitely worth reading.



Ultra Conservatives



Ultra conservatives are likely to embrace Crusader Christianity to fight against Islam and have been opposed to Cultural Marxism for decades. They will likely mobilize by themselves in tight knit church communities. It’s unlikely they will fully agree with 2083, but they will find the idea of a Cultural Christian identity and anti-totalitarian attitudes more appealing than Multiculturalism.



Hereditarianists



This will be a group of eugenicists, social darwinists, transhumanists and related factions. The end of Cultural Marxism is obviously in the best interest of ideologies that favor the nature model. These groups will have to embrace nationalism to some degree as they tend to favor individualism.



Nationalists



Radicalization is a steady process that typically goes in one direction. Once someone discovers a forbidden truth this truth cannot be easily erased. Nationalists are likely to radicalize towards militant nationalism, and 7/22 has made enough of an impact that for several years nationalists will come to realize that they’ve lost faith in the democratic process and subsequently download a copy of 2083.



National Environmentalists



This is a movement Breivik largely ignored, but one of the most potent factions. The most radical environmentalists realize that immigration is the biggest threat to the environment and favor depopulation, an agenda the Cultural Marxists will never support. Many also realize that if native species should be protected, the same should go for the native human population. The environmentalist agenda needs to be given serious attention.



National Socialists



The platform described in 2083 is largely compatible with National Socialism. The rejection of supremacism, totalitarianism, and expansionism are notable differences.



Odinists



As Christianity wiped out Germanic paganism there will likely be some hostile attitudes toward a Cultural Christian identity. A moderating religion like Christianity is a must though. Without Cultural Marxism Europe may be exposed to the same instability that led to the first and second World War.



Odinism should be given a more central role in the Nordic cultural identity, but this isn’t a force that will result in pan-European unity.



