Reading Sartre: Postcapitalist objectivism and subconstructivist

theory

N. Wilhelm la Tournier



Department of Sociolinguistics, Stanford University





1. Discourses of futility

“Sexual identity is part of the dialectic of reality,” says Lacan; however,

according to von Junz[1] , it is not so much sexual identity

that is part of the dialectic of reality, but rather the failure, and

subsequent paradigm, of sexual identity. It could be said that if

subconstructivist theory holds, we have to choose between neodialectic

desemioticism and materialist materialism.

“Society is fundamentally meaningless,” says Bataille. The example of

subconstructivist theory intrinsic to Madonna’s Erotica is also evident

in Material Girl, although in a more subdialectic sense. In a sense, the

main theme of the works of Madonna is the role of the writer as observer.

The primary theme of Porter’s[2] model of postcapitalist

objectivism is not discourse, but prediscourse. The subject is interpolated

into a constructivist libertarianism that includes language as a paradox.

Therefore, Debord uses the term ‘Lacanist obscurity’ to denote the absurdity of

subdialectic art.

In the works of Spelling, a predominant concept is the distinction between

opening and closing. Many constructions concerning subconstructivist theory may

be discovered. Thus, Sartre suggests the use of constructivist libertarianism

to analyse and modify class.

The subject is contextualised into a subconstructivist theory that includes

consciousness as a reality. However, la Fournier[3] holds

that the works of Spelling are reminiscent of McLaren.

Lyotard promotes the use of postcapitalist objectivism to challenge sexism.

It could be said that if subconstructivist theory holds, we have to choose

between neomaterialist cultural theory and subpatriarchial rationalism.

The subject is interpolated into a postcapitalist objectivism that includes

reality as a totality. But Lacan uses the term ‘the textual paradigm of

reality’ to denote the common ground between society and class.

Geoffrey[4] implies that we have to choose between

subconstructivist theory and Sontagist camp. Therefore, the characteristic

theme of the works of Spelling is the role of the writer as reader.

Marx suggests the use of precapitalist theory to attack sexual identity. But

if constructivist libertarianism holds, we have to choose between

subconstructivist theory and Derridaist reading.

The fatal flaw, and some would say the paradigm, of constructivist

libertarianism prevalent in Spelling’s Robin’s Hoods emerges again in

Melrose Place. In a sense, the premise of postcapitalist objectivism

suggests that society has intrinsic meaning.

2. Constructivist libertarianism and modern feminism

“Truth is part of the rubicon of language,” says Marx. Foucault promotes the

use of subconstructivist theory to challenge hierarchy. Thus, Prinn[5] holds that we have to choose between Lacanist obscurity and

postcultural discourse.

“Sexual identity is intrinsically used in the service of sexism,” says

Derrida; however, according to Dahmus[6] , it is not so much

sexual identity that is intrinsically used in the service of sexism, but rather

the collapse, and subsequent stasis, of sexual identity. Baudrillard suggests

the use of subconstructivist theory to read and modify art. However, the

subject is contextualised into a structural theory that includes language as a

reality.

If one examines modern feminism, one is faced with a choice: either accept

subconstructivist theory or conclude that the State is part of the paradigm of

narrativity. Debord’s analysis of postcapitalist objectivism suggests that

sexuality is capable of truth. In a sense, the subject is interpolated into a

modern feminism that includes reality as a whole.

In the works of Spelling, a predominant concept is the concept of

subdialectic culture. Bataille promotes the use of capitalist construction to

attack outmoded, elitist perceptions of sexual identity. It could be said that

several narratives concerning not, in fact, sublimation, but presublimation

exist.

If one examines modern feminism, one is faced with a choice: either reject

neotextual discourse or conclude that class, surprisingly, has objective value,

but only if the premise of modern feminism is invalid; otherwise, we can assume

that government is capable of significance. Marx uses the term

‘subconstructivist theory’ to denote a mythopoetical paradox. Therefore, modern

feminism holds that reality comes from communication, given that reality is

interchangeable with art.

Lyotard suggests the use of postcapitalist objectivism to analyse sexual

identity. It could be said that if modern feminism holds, the works of Spelling

are empowering.

An abundance of constructions concerning postcapitalist objectivism may be

revealed. But Foucault uses the term ‘Marxist socialism’ to denote the

difference between narrativity and sexual identity.

The premise of postcapitalist objectivism implies that sexuality is capable

of deconstruction. In a sense, a number of demodernisms concerning the role of

the observer as artist exist.

The subject is contextualised into a subconstructivist theory that includes

art as a reality. But Bataille promotes the use of semiotic subdialectic theory

to deconstruct the status quo.

Many sublimations concerning postcapitalist objectivism may be discovered.

However, Lyotard suggests the use of structural nationalism to read and analyse

reality.

Foucault’s critique of modern feminism holds that the collective is dead.

But any number of theories concerning the bridge between society and sexual

identity exist.

3. Narratives of meaninglessness

In the works of Spelling, a predominant concept is the distinction between

figure and ground. Lacan uses the term ‘Baudrillardist simulation’ to denote a

postmodernist whole. In a sense, Lyotard promotes the use of subconstructivist

theory to challenge hierarchy.

Debord uses the term ‘modern feminism’ to denote the difference between

class and narrativity. But the subject is interpolated into a dialectic

objectivism that includes sexuality as a paradox.

In Robin’s Hoods, Spelling denies postcapitalist objectivism; in

The Heights, although, he deconstructs subcapitalist construction. It

could be said that the subject is contextualised into a modern feminism that

includes consciousness as a totality.

The main theme of Humphrey’s[7] model of postcapitalist

discourse is the stasis, and hence the absurdity, of dialectic society. In a

sense, Baudrillard uses the term ‘subconstructivist theory’ to denote the

common ground between sexual identity and sexuality.

1. von Junz, R. H. (1987)

Subconstructivist theory in the works of Madonna. Cambridge University

Press

2. Porter, F. ed. (1976) Reinventing Surrealism:

Postcapitalist objectivism in the works of Spelling. O’Reilly &

Associates

3. la Fournier, N. S. (1984) Subconstructivist theory and

postcapitalist objectivism. And/Or Press

4. Geoffrey, N. ed. (1996) Postcapitalist Theories:

Postcapitalist objectivism and subconstructivist theory. Loompanics

5. Prinn, A. R. (1980) Postcapitalist objectivism in the

works of Spelling. Harvard University Press

6. Dahmus, E. ed. (1993) The Economy of Context:

Postcapitalist objectivism in the works of Joyce. Loompanics

7. Humphrey, V. M. V. (1986) Subconstructivist theory and

postcapitalist objectivism. Oxford University Press

The essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly generated by the Postmodernism Generator. To generate another essay, follow this link.

If you liked this particular essay and would like to return to it, follow this link for a bookmarkable page.

The Postmodernism Generator was written by Andrew C. Bulhak using the Dada Engine, a system for generating random text from recursive grammars, and modified very slightly by Josh Larios (this version, anyway. There are others out there).

This installation of the Generator has delivered 26,671,778 essays since 25/Feb/2000 18:43:09 PST, when it became operational.

More detailed technical information may be found in Monash University Department of Computer Science Technical Report 96/264: “On the Simulation of Postmodernism and Mental Debility Using Recursive Transition Networks“.

More generated texts are linked to from the sidebar to the right.

If you enjoy this, you might also enjoy reading about the Social Text Affair, where NYU Physics Professor Alan Sokal’s brilliant(ly meaningless) hoax article was accepted by a cultural criticism publication.