America’s top newspapers led with one story on Wednesday — the impeachment inquiry announced by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

Pelosi said Trump’s demand to Ukraine’s president to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden, and his son Hunter who served on the board of a natural gas company, was a “betrayal” of Trump’s oath of office, U.S. national security and election integrity.

Related: Why Trump impeachment threat is rattling the stock market

The New York Times cover had four stories. “Pelosi will open formal impeachment inquiry accusing president of ‘betrayal’ of the nation,” read the top story.

The newspaper also had articles about the impeachment fight from Trump’s perspective, the talks on giving Congress access to the whistleblower, and an analysis piece on what is different now.

“We have been headed here inexorably,” the Times quoted Michael J. Gerhardt, an impeachment scholar at the University of North Carolina, as saying.

And Trump, the Times said, “made clear he was ready for a fight.”

The Washington Post cover went with “House opens impeachment inquiry,” with stories on the shadow Ukraine policy ran by Trump’s personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani, an analysis about the uncertain process, and Trump’s attack on globalism that he delivered at the United Nations.

“Several officials described tense meetings on Ukraine among national security officials at the White House leading up to the president’s phone call on July 25, sessions that led some participants to fear that Trump and those close to him appeared prepared to use U.S. leverage with the new leader of Ukraine for Trump’s political gain,” read the Post story on Giuliani.

The Wall Street Journal cover was “Impeachment inquiry begins,” and an analysis on the risks to both Trump and Democrats.

Pelosi, notes the Journal’s Gerald Seib, had “resisted pressure bubbling up from the liberal base” for months. But “what had started as a fringe idea within the party became a mainstream demand with remarkable speed.” The trigger, he wrote, was an op-ed from seven House Democratic freshmen — all of whom had served either in the military or national-security agencies, all of whom hailed from swing districts.