With a narrow margin in the ballot measure concerning the future of vacation rentals in South Lake Tahoe, and other races still close, everyone is awaiting the release of more results from Tuesday's election.

You'll still have to wait a bit longer.

On Friday, November 9, El Dorado County Elections will post the next round of results, but it won't be the last as there are over 24,000 ballots yet to count.

13,372 mail-in ballots were dropped off at the polls

2,614 provisional ballots

8,365 conditional ballots, those dropped off in drops boxes in South Lake Tahoe and Placerville and received in the mail Tuesday

Plus, it is unknown how many ballots were postmarked on Tuesday but haven't been received in the mail.

Ballots received by mail have a long process to follow according to Linda Webster, the assistant registrar of voters for the County. Every signature has to be checked and a ballot reviewed for extra marks and writing. Those that are written on must be duplicated by hand. Webster says people will write comments on the ballot, many of the derogatory nature. Those are pulled, rewritten and documented with the original received.

If you're a numbers person you may be able to figure out statistically how many of those 24,000 ballots could be from South Lake Tahoe.

There are 121,192 registered voters in El Dorado County. 20,896 of those are in the Area 5 supervisorial district, and 10,959 of those are in the City of South Lake Tahoe boundaries (so 9937 in Tahoma, Meyers, Pollock Pines and other non-city areas). That means 100,296 people in areas outside of Area 5 and South Lake Tahoe could have voted.

So far, 47.2 percent of those registered in Area 5 have had their votes counted, or 9,869 residents.

42.7 percent of those registered in the city limits, or 4,684 residents, have had ballots counted.

County-wide, 53.49 percent of registered voters have had their choices recorded, or 64,824 people.

So, if ten percent of those ballots are from those in South Lake Tahoe there could still be 2,400 uncounted votes. How many of those are for Yes or No on T? That remains unknown.

These late counts changed the outcome of the 2012 SLT City Council election when Austin Sass overtook Angela Swanson at the end.

We will keep you updated as counts are released.

At this time, the following are the local results of the Tuesday night count:

El Dorado County Board of Supervisors Area 5

Sue Novasel - incumbent - 4690 52.36%

Ken Curtzwiler - 4226 47.18%

South Lake Tahoe City Council - Top 3

Cody Bass - 1957 16.92%

Wendy David - incumbent - 1427 12.33%

Tom Davis - incumbent - 923 7.98%

Hal Cole - 1156 9.99%

Bruce Grego - 1158 10.01%

Patrick Jarret - 472 4.08%

Devin Middlebrook - 2102 18.17%

Austin Sass - incumbent - 618 5.34%

Tamara Wallace - 1716 14.83%

South Lake Tahoe Measure T - Vacation Home Rentals

Yes -2345 51.23%

No - 2232 48.77%

South Tahoe Public Utility District - Top 3

Chris Cefalu - incumbent - 2707 17.54%

Nick Exline - 3592 23.27%

James Jones - incumbent - 2436 15.78%

Louis Pierini - 2013 13.04%

Eric Schafer - 2322 15.05%

Duane Wallace - incumbent - 2309 14.96%

South Lake Tahoe City Clerk

Sue Blankenship - 2274 60.22%

Ellen Palazzo- 1481 39.22%

South Lake Tahoe Treasurer

David Olivo - incumbent - 3396 98.55%

LTCC Board of Directors Area 5

Michael Marini- 516 34.35%

Tony Sears - 978 65.11%

El Dorado County Recorder-Clerk

Janelle Horne - 32268 58.41%

Todd White - 22842 41.35%

El Dorado County Measures

Measure J - Transient Occupancy Tax rise to 12 percent

Yes - 26704 44.21%

No - 33696 55.79%

Measure N - Taxation, permitting and enforcement of cannabis

Yes - 38800 64.68%

No - 21188 35.32%

Measure P - Authorization and regulation of outdoor grows of medical cannabis - Outdoor and canopy areas defined

Yes - 36212 60.41%

No - 23728 39.59%

Measure Q - Authorization and regulation of outdoor grows of recreational cannabis - Outdoor and canopy areas defined

Yes - 35264 59.04%

No - 24461 40.96%

Measure R - Authorization and regulation of retail sales, distribution, indoor cultivation of cannabis

Yes - 36175 60.87%

No - 23256 39.13%

Measure S - County Cannabis

Yes - 35175 59.65%

No - 23792 40.35%

Measure U - County Charter change to allow supervisors to be in office three terms

Yes - 13888 23.64%

No - 44857 76.36%

SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, Calif. - It's been an election season unlike many others with perhaps a record turnout expected for a gubernatorial election in California.

At the local level, nine candidates for South Lake Tahoe City Council, two vying for the El Dorado County Board of Supervisor seat for Area 5, and contentious ballot measures have flooded election offices with completed ballots.

After the polls closed at 8:00 p.m., the first count of mail-in ballots received have been released and with just over 26 percent of the vote counted:

El Dorado County Board of Supervisors Area 5

Sue Novasel - incumbent - 3231 53.09%

Ken Curtzwiler - 2828 46.47%

South Lake Tahoe City Council

Cody Bass - 1181 15.99%

Wendy David - incumbent - 914 12.37%

Tom Davis - incumbent - 591 8.00%

Hal Cole - 767 10.38%

Bruce Grego - 755 10.22%

Patrick Jarret - 298 4.03%

Devin Middlebrook - 1309 17.72%

Austin Sass - incumbent - 396 5.36%

Tamara Wallace - 1148 15.54%

South Lake Tahoe Measure T - Vacation Home Rentals

Yes -1439 50.70%

No -1399 49.30%

South Tahoe Public Utility District

Chris Cefalu - incumbent - 1776 17.27%

Nick Exline - 2394 23.29%

James Jones - incumbent - 1696 16.50%

Louis Pierini - 1300 12.64%

Eric Schafer - 1570 15.27%

Duane Wallace - incumbent - 1505 14.64%

South Lake Tahoe City Clerk

Sue Blankenship - 1487 62.48%

Ellen Palazzo- 879 36.93%

South Lake Tahoe Treasurer

David Olivo - incumbent - 2164 98.59%

LTCC Board of Directors Area 5

Michael Marini- 345 35.28%

Tony Sears - 628 64.21%

El Dorado County Measures

Measure J - Transient Occupancy Tax rise to 12 percent

Yes - 20512 45.00%

No - 25072 55.00%

Measure N - Taxation, permitting and enforcement of cannabis

Yes - 29894 66.02%

No - 15383 33.98%

Measure P - Authorization and regulation of outdoor grows of medical cannabis - Outdoor and canopy areas defined

Yes - 27829 61.55%

No - 17387 38.45%

Measure Q - Authorization and regulation of outdoor grows of recreational cannabis - Outdoor and canopy areas defined

Yes - 27095 60.14%

No - 17959 39.86%

Measure R - Authorization and regulation of retail sales, distribution, indoor cultivation of cannabis

Yes - 27777 61.95%

No - 17060 38.05%

Measure S - County Cannabis

Yes - 27011 60.73%

No - 17466 39.27%

Measure U - County Charter change to allow supervisors to be in office three terms

Yes - 10480 23.60%

No - 33925 76.40%