Advertisement Judge rules man acted in self-defense when shooting two brothers Share Shares Copy Link Copy

A judge ruled a Louisville man acted in self-defense when he shot two brothers.William Albright was charged with murder in the death of Cameron Pearson.He was also facing assault charges for shooting Kyle Pearson.This was a case in which two brothers, Cameron and Kyle Pearson, were fighting over a gun in the parking lot of a Valley Station strip mall in July 2015.In her opinion, Judge Audra Eckerle ruled William Albright had reasons to believe his life and the lives of others in the area may have been in danger."He was very pleased. He's glad that this chapter is over. And that's just it, this is just a chapter of it," attorney Robert Schaefer said.The judge noted the two brothers were fighting over a gun with bystanders in the area.Albright asked them to stop and drop the gun, and when they didn't, he fired."One of the questions I asked him, I said, ‘Would you do it again? Knowing what you know now, knowing what all you've been through, would you do this again?’ And he said ‘Absolutely.’ He said, ‘It's cost me a lot, 'but it was important for him to protect himself and others,’" Schaefer said.Schaefer said Albright lost his gun business and personal relationships after being charged with murder.But the family of Cameron Pearson said they lost a lot more."You know, Mr. Albright's business, and his relationships that he lost can be rebuilt. My son's life can never be rebuilt and he can never be here again. I have to go every single day, every holiday, without seeing my son," Pearson said.In her ruling, Judge Eckerle wrote the burden of proof was on the prosecution to show Albright used excessive force.She wrote, in part, "It is not for the court (or the commonwealth) to say what ought to have been done, but only what is allowed under the law.”Pearson disagrees."By the judge dismissing this case, it kind of sends a message that it's OK to shoot whoever to diffuse a dangerous situation and that's not the message we need to be sending," Pearson said.The Commonwealth's Attorney's Office said they are reviewing the judge's opinion to decide whether to appeal it.