List of criminals at large & glorified by the Canadian Justice Systems:

Sarah Carter, false witness & professor of Sheridan College, committed perjury Brenda J. Bowlby, lawyer, defended and encouraged perjury Keith Brennenstuhl, vice chair of Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, committed perjury Christine O'Neill, intake counsel of the Law Society of Upper Canada, perjury coverup Katherine Ramsey, investigator of Ombudsman Ontario, perjury coverup Crown Attorney of Courts Ontario, perjury coverup













My Story in Words





I was a student at Sheridan College from 2010 to 2013 , and a Scholarship and Sheridan Excellence Bursary winner.





In my mandatory academic assignment of Business Communication course February 2011 , I commented on MacDonalds’ removing pig from the Chinese zodiac to avoid offending pig-hating Moslems, my instructor Sarah Carter removed my posting from the discussion board. One month later, when I encountered conflict in a team project in Sarah Carter’s course, she raised the marks of one team member who contributed nothing to the project from 0 to 6 , for no reason, and reported me being racist to the deans because of my comment on Islam made one month ago. Dean Neil Robb instructed Sunand Sharma, the Student Rights Officer, to fix me. Sarah Carter then emailed me to meet her at the Student Rights Office, to discuss the team conflicts, but never told me I was reported being racist.





When I was there (B305 as pictured) for the meeting as scheduled, Sarah Carter told me to wait another half hour while she and Sunand Sharma plotted how to fix me behind closed doors. Sunand Sharma first blamed my age for the team conflicts which was not the case. Then he advised me to learn to work with liars like one of my team members, because “the Canadian workplace is full of liars,” he said. Finally he called me a racist, accusing me of defaming the Moslem race and violating the Human Rights Code; and issued me a verbal warning! All these happened out of blue two weeks before the examination week. I could not believe this happened to me in the free land of Canada. Because of this,





I could not sleep during the entire week that followed, and became very sick in the midst of the exams. After the exams, I appealed Sunand Sharma’s verbal warning to Mr. Rob Till, Dean of Student Service, the big boss of Sunand Sharma, who replied one week later that I had not been charged. Not sure whether I had a verbal warning on file, I studied the Human Rights Code, and found Sunand Sharma had violated the Code, not me. In May 2011 , I filed an application with HRTO, Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, against Sunand Sharma and Sheridan College. Sheridan College hired Brenda Bowlby of Hicks Morley to defend Sunand Sharma and itself. Brenda Bowlby submitted tons of false evidence to the Tribunal, Sarah Carter, a professor of Sheridan College, gave contradicting testimonies and committed perjury during the hearing!





The following hearing recording is Sarah Carter’s perjury caught on tape!

At 3 : 44 of the recording of the hearing, File # 11 , October 23 , 2012 , Sarah Carter gave the following evidence in the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario. “I might have made made what I thought was a friendly comment indicating that maybe you are somewhat close to my age, I, I, you know I have a daughter, I know you have a daughter, I, that’s the only reference of age that I that I made.”





Two minutes later, at 5:48 of the same recording file, Sarah Carter said: “I don’t think I said you and I were at the same age.”





Canada Criminal Code

Section 136.1

“Every one who, being a witness in a judicial proceeding, gives evidence with respect to any matter of fact or knowledge and who subsequently, in a judicial proceeding, gives evidence that is contrary to his previous evidence is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years, whether or not the prior or later evidence or either is true,”





Lawyer Brenda Bowlby was caught urging the Tribunal to fabricate a fact that Sarah Carter had not perjured herself, at 9 : 40 of the recording of the Conference Call on January 7 , 2013 , Audio File # 15 . “We are urging that the Tribunal to as part of its findings make a finding of a fact that that the witness Carter was credible, that she did not perjure herself...”





So two “facts” were fabricated by the Tribunal:

1. The perjurer Sarah Carter “was an exemplary witness”

2. “the applicant has failed to provide credible evidence to support this extremely serious allegation of perjury.”





Based on the fabricated “facts”, the Tribunal ordered the dismissal of the Application and sacrificed the applicant on the altar of the blue code of silence –– everyone outside that blue wall is doomed!

Angry at the Tribunal’s injustice, I took the hearing recording to the Ontario Court of Justice in Brampton, but was told to by the Crown Attorney that the police must investigate the perjury before I could lay a charge. So

I took my evidence to the Police, who made it clear that Police was not involved in a perjury charge arisen from a civil lawsuit; it was the responsibility of the Court House.





The Income Tax Act, Highway Traffic Act, and Parking by-law, etc. are being vigorously enforced, because they generate profit for the Receiver General for Canada, but not Section 136.1 of the Canada Criminal Code.





Each of the following government offices receives a copy of my complaint with the evidence listed at Justice in Canada





Date Fax/Email Out Government Offices Response & Decision July 4, 2013 The Ombudsman of Ontario

August 23 July 8, 2013 The Law Society of Upper Canada

September 3 July 14, 2013 Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada

September 16 July 14, 2013 Parliament of Canada

No response yet! July 14, 2013 Prime Minister of Canada

July 14, 2013 Legislative Assembly of Ontario

July 14, 2013 Premier of Ontario







On August 23 , 2013 , after 50 days’ investigation, the Ombudsman of Ontario concluded: “ the Tribunal followed its practices and acted within its legislated mandate. ”





On September 3 , 2013 , after 57 days’ investigation, the Law Society of Upper Canada closed my complaint file, because I “allege that Professor Carter made contradictory statements during her cross-examination but Vice Chair Brennenstuhl did not find that to be the case.”





The opinions and lies of a judge or vice chair have been made facts and evidence and laws by the Law Society of Upper Canada.





On September 16 , 2013 , Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada replied and instructed me “to seek the advice of a lawyer... the Law Society of Upper Canada, can refer you to a lawyer...” he says.





Practice Directive (April 10, 1989 ) by Former Chief Justice of Ontario W.G.C. Howland

“the unobtrusive use of a recording device from the body of the courtroom by a solicitor, a party acting in person, or a journalist for the sole purpose of supplementing or replacing handwritten notes may be considered as being approved without an oral or written application to the presiding judge .”





The Practice Direction on Recording Hearings of Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario blatantly goes against the law: “If a party wishes to record a hearing to supplement his or her notes, he or she must get the permission of the panel…” (May 2013 version)





Now you know the Tribunal is a law breaker, a liar, and a dark chamber for evil men’s secret operations; in which all truth is buried alive!





The perjurer, the lawyer, the Tribunal, the Law Society of Upper Canada, Ombudsman of Ontario, the Court, and the Police, ALL CONSPIRE together with one accord against truth and facts, to deprive the inflicted of justice and human rights.





The Department of Justice Canada launched a campaign of Supporting Victims of Crime. Why am I not supported? I am the victim of a perjury crime! Is this another government lie?





The Canadian law is made to terrorize everyone outside the blue wall! Truth and Justice are nowhere to be found, and whoever shuns evil becomes a prey. This is the chilling reality of Canada.





My story is not a big case, but it is big enough to bring you to the truth. The Canadian court and tribunal and law society and watch dog and educational institution can't uphold justice even in such a tiny case, what can you expect from them in a big case?Luke 16:10 “One who is faithful in a very little is also faithful in much, and one who is dishonest in a very little is also dishonest in much.”Shocked by the mistreatment and crimes of Sheridan College, Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, Court of Ontario, the Law Society of Upper Canada, Ombudsman of Ontario... and their coverups, I dug into the corruption of government, politics, and the justice system, only to be dumbfounded by the massive corruption cases inside the government of Canada, of which I have collected a few major ones in my google site Justice in Canada and my twin blog “ Their Stories, Injustice and Corruption in Canada ”.