The Golem crypto system is designed to give people the opportunity to decentralize their computing infrastructure.

Quite an interesting proposition – the system was designed to turn idle computing resources (CPU/GPU power) to the task of rendering images, processing large calculations and providing extra compute infrastructure for large operations (such as saving data to a database).

This is a major issue – with the concept of cloud computing being heavily associated with the likes of Render Farms and other multi-system supercomputer processing facilities.

If you want to render 3D graphics, for example, what you end up doing is setting your CPU/computer to run for hours whilst it renders (computes) each frame. Thus, if you have an animation – which could be, say, 500 frames long – the time to render it in each frame’s rendering time * 500.

Also Read: What is Ontology (ONT)? — 'Blockchain to the Masses' — Beginner's Guide

The reason this is important is that people have turned to the likes of AWS (Amazon Web Services) or Microsoft Azure to provide MASS computing infrastructure, on which they’re able to install the likes of RenderManager onto them to provide the most effective rendering experience (where you can utilize 128GB of RAM + high-powered CPU’s).

We know this market exists.

We know this market is huge.

And – apparently – the Golem team know how to decentralize it…

What is Golem?

Ethereum-based Golem is meant to be a decentralized market for computing power.

The idea is that it’s meant to give people the opportunity to utilize computing power from a range of different systems around the world (decentralized) whilst paying a relatively small fee for their usage. The owners of said systems will earn from their use.

The system works by taking small tasks (smart contracts) which are either files or some other command-structure and then making it so that computers in the large decentralized Golem network are able to crunch them.

By allocating compute resources to processing these packets of data, the Golem system is able to reward node providers with money and the users with the actual compiled application.

Whilst this works well in principle, a user from Reddit highlighted a significant problem – namely that when a customer wants to get their data crunched by the network, they need to invest time & money into buying/setting-up the Golem SDK.

This isn’t the problem… as the investment into an SDK would be necessary with any cloud computing system. The problem lies in the tie-in this causes for the customer.

Quick Guide: What is OmiseGO (OMG)? — 'Banking for Everyone' — Beginner's Guide

Rather than using an already-successful BOINC, or other distributed system, the customer is tied down with Golem… relying on their network having adequate inventory for someone to process the job at the price they need.

An example of the system in existence already – BOINC.

What’s important is that it actually seems that this has a business case behind it (with its development team located in a central Warsaw office).

Whilst this might seem somewhat mundane, it’s important because it gives heed to the notion that many of the new crypto systems are designed around proposing great business benefits (that can be paid for), rather than relying on the system to somehow earn money later on.

Having said, many of the seasoned crypto investors we talked to found the Golem idea good but its execution bad. Not much information has been published about the way in which the team hopes to achieve its vision, and the code repositories made available thus far have not been conclusive.

Who created it?

The Golem team seems extensive, with a number of developers who have massive levels of experience in the crypto space.

After looking through the various LinkedIn profiles, it’s obvious they’re from Poland. How they’ve funded the project thus far they have not said – but ultimately, their lead-team can be summed up with the following:

Julian Zawistowski

Finally, someone unafraid to actually put their real name and face out into the world – Julian has been a very public advocate of all what Golem stands for and is continually providing the community with support and updates on the next versions of the system.

Listed as CEO of Golem Factory (the overseeing company for the Golem technology) and now a Director of Golem Foundation, his experience seems to range from being the CEO of Claimstorm to having held a number of research roles.

Piotr Janiuk

Acting CEO, Chief Technical Officer and Co-Founder, Piotr seems to have experience with several Internet software companies before running the technological team behind Golem.

Why does it exist?

As explained, the Golem project was designed to actually provide a core business-case to users.

In other words, it actually has a potential for profit, and can thus be attributed to an actual business (more than can be said about most of the coins entering the crypto space)…

Golem is the first truly decentralized supercomputer, creating a global market for

computing power. Combined with flexible tools to aid developers in securely

distributing and monetizing their software, Golem altogether changes the way

compute tasks are organized and executed. By powering decentralized microservices and asynchronous task execution, Golem is set to become a key building block for future Internet service providers and software development. And, by substantially lowering the price of computations, complex applications such as CGI rendering, scientific calculation, and machine learning become more accessible to everyone.

From the Golem Whitepaper.

What’s most important about this is the way in which developers could use the service to provide high-powered computing power to the backend of their applications.

You might also be interested: Can Blockchain Change the World? — 3 Signs that it could be the Next Internet

This is an aspect to computing which has not been considered yet, and is one *ripe* for a service such as Golem to disrupt. To give an insight into the trick of winning big in the computing market, the real secret is to provide a killer app – a piece of functionality that can *ONLY* be achieved with the software/hardware combination provided by a company.

Whilst it’s easy to replicate the results of other people, the REAL winners (most notably Apple) were able to create NEW ways of using technology – this is really the challenge for the likes of Golem… the ability to create a paradigm which transcends the technology and actually provides a great use-case for the end-user.

If Golem is able to do this with software developers (IE provide distributed compute infrastructure for their applications), it would not only allow them to store the likes of data in decentralized systems, but also remove the requirement for massive 'client-side' compute power. This would be a major boon – if the company was able to sign up prestigious developers.

Trajectory

In order to effectively consider the effectiveness of this system, you need several things in place. Firstly, an adequate compute infrastructure (to rival the likes of AWS) and secondly, the ability to utilize it effectively.

As mentioned, Golem offers a definite use-case – whereby the system is able to provide an alternative solution to a common problem (the need to outsource rendering or other data processing), and the decentralized nature of the system definitely lends itself to this type of business model.

As with other altcoins, the system’s success is measured predominantly by adoption (the number of people dedicated to providing CPU resource) and usage (the amount each coin is transacted).

Also Read: What is IOTA? — 'Kingpin of IoT' — Beginner's Guide

The price of the coin of the system is generally the result of several metrics – namely the ability for the user to actually gain value from the system (hence the transaction metric), and the ability for the mining network to profit from it.

The way in which the founder/management team works on the system should be an indicator of the price.

Fortunately, it seems that the team behind the system are necessarily competent (to deliver their vision) and consequently might be able to produce a product worth sharing. However, with entrenched competition from Microsoft, Google and Amazon – it’s obvious that this isn’t going to be a walk in the park (and investors can sense it).