Show me research by Jews condemning the Fed, condemn­ing Jewish mass murders in the USSR and Ukraine, condemning the Holohoax fraud, condemn­ing Kis­singer's mass murders, condemn­ing Jews in Palestine, condemn­ing Jews and the slave trade, condemn­ing Jewish media lies on violence, condemn­ing the Jewish 'holy books' etc. If there are so many decent Jews you'll have no diff­iculty finding plenty. Truths about Judaism © Rae West 2000, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020. v. 15 Sept 2020

Studies in the Anthropology of a Genetically-Fanatical Racial Group ...

... Read This to Understand Our World: Invest a Little Time Into Your Whole Future

Three other Sites in this Series (more details below):– Guide for the Perplexed About Jews | Speculative & News Articles on Jews | Teaching about Jews

Sites from the net:– Hundreds of Jew-Aware Jadar Sites vs. Jew-Blind, and Jew-Evading, 'Joff' Sites



Contents:—

INTRO FOR NEWBIES directly below

SOME SIGNIFICANT JEW-RELATED HISTORICAL EVENTS in date order - Jews from early times to the present



[ Specimen with photos of Jewish information control and censorship ]



[ Example of Jews and Freemasons—this example is Neville Nagler who helped draft British anti-white race laws | Links ]



[ Privatisation and Thatcherism/Reaganism | Money from Wars | Jewish political parties | 'Holocaust' and other frauds | Jewish control of 'education' | Church | White genocide ]

[ Back to big-lies website ]

My chronology, the whole of this page, is intended as a reference. It includes individuals and groups who spoke, wrote, were influenced by, and published on Jews. Many of these people were censored and suppressed, and are not well-known.

Newbies? A few notes to people new to the subject of 'Jews'.

• 'JEWS' have a different idea of a nation. They are spread out, over a network of localities, an empire united by sea and air lanes, multiple locations communicating with each other, a layer distributed over other nations. They exchange news in their secret common language.

• Every country has its own people—plus Jews. If you understand that 'Americans' are Americans+Jews, Germans are Germans+Jews, Palestine is Palestinians+Jews, France is French people+Jews, China=Chinese people+Jews, Turkey is Turks and Jews, then you'll understand much of the modern world.

• Discovery of the 500-year War of Jewish Aggression shows the present messy state of research.

• 'Jews' are largely ruled by the Talmud, which has to be understood in outline. The oddities of Jews and their hangers-on, such as Freemasons, are largely attributable to their weird caste system and the Talmud. For example, their secret violence, their mania for moving populations around, their legal impositions, and their paper money need to be traced to their Talmudic roots.

• RELIGIONS.

• MONEY.

• WAR.

• REVISIONISM.

OTHER PEOPLE'S SITES. I have two huge lists of sites: JADAR is my list, built up over many years, of sites which acknowledge Jewish threats. They have different approaches and interests; but there they are. The first half are five-star sites, listed in the website pecking order as 1st down to 250,000th. The second half are lower, but may be very good, but have local or special interests making them list lower. As far as I know they are all safe, judging from Malwarebytes.

Opposite is my list of JOFF sites which suppress most information about Jews; some are run by Jews, maybe as spoiler sites; there are deception sites, blaming-others sites, misleading sites on countries, psyops, fake charities, and some government 'intelligence' sites—the full range of Jewish 'talent'. I've given reasons for my opinions with both types of site.

PUZZLES REVISIONISM WILL HELP YOU UNDERSTAND. I strongly suspect that the success of the Jewish invasion of Palestine has helped convince many Europhobic Jews that promoting non-European migration into Europe is the way to divest Europeans of their ancestral lands From https://theeuropeanfamily.com/

'British' 'vigil' after 2019 fake attack. Officially Sadiq Khan, Boris Johnson, Jeremy Corbyn. Muslim (Jewish invented system; millions of deaths; Turkish Jew stock (millions of middle east deaths); Russian Jew stock (millions of deaths in USSR).

Just one African dictator of many from 2014 'African summit' in Soetero's [i.e. Obama's] time. With 'dumb ass' marines, though in fact the background was probably faked.

'Alf Dubs welcoming invaders, so-called children, in 2016.' Who is this? Why the absurd name? What does he think he's doing?



Mediæval chess?

As a result of the [Papal] permission, the Jews ranked with the knights and the feudatories who belonged to the upper strata of medieval society.

Reconsideration of Christianity, not from the older rationalist view, but from a perspective perhaps originating with Nietzsche, examining attitudes such as perpetual punishment, the sense of sin, race, 'birthright', the myth of eternal life as a disincentive to action, and possible deliberate Jewish introduction and infiltration of damaging attitudes. An obvious example is the forgiving attitude of [parts of] Christianity. Another is the viciously homicidal and genocidal God.

Christianity considered as a slow, long-term injection of Jewish fiction into Europe, is new, at least to me: from this viewpoint, Christianity was a disaster, more or less comparable with modern-day effect of Jews as frauds, liars, and war-mongers, hating and trying to destroy Europe and whites. Bishops, Popes and so on more or less correspond to 'politically correct' collaborators of Jews. Fortunately, Christianity, despite its power, never overcome local forces of opposition.

• And reconsideration of economics, for example as a long-term war involving finance, analogous to the rise of legalism. Most economic theory is short-term and does not consider money backed by governments or other force, crashes, panics, and financial subsidies in a way analogous to wars. And science revisionism including everything from education theory to biology and nuclear weapons and nuclear power. And reconsideration of general personal histories: F J Irsigler's Who Makes Our Money? a south African Catholic medical man who lived through the Second World War.

• My list of JADAR sites has a few hundred websites (with approximate popularity ratings) which appear to be sound. My notes on Jew-blind organisations—there are very many—I've called 'JOFF' sites for want of a better phrase.

LONG LIST OF SIGNIFICANT JEW-RELATED HISTORICAL EVENTS in date order



NEW: MARCH 16 2020 Where Did All the Phoenicians Go? Very exciting new paper by Miles Mathis, which links Hittites and the iron age and monopoly of iron, Troy and iron and silver in what's now Turkey, Persia, the Odyssey, the Phoenician and later alphabets, Alexander of Macedon, Thucydides and other liar-historians, Sparta, and the likely-true histories of many more-or-less mythical names from the ancient Greeks. And rearrangements of wars and battles, deleting doubtful wars and reinterpreting changes in 'elites'.

[ Searching my own site for keywords gives McCabe's Rationalist Encyclopaedia the largest hit rate, suggesting that Catholic sources may provide evidence in future. This scored higher than MWM's own file, Pheon4 by 'Gerry'. Another high scorer is Buckle's State of Historical Literature during the Middle Ages which has picturesque examples of errors, but no thread through the maze. ]

I like to hope that elderly classicists—possibly confined to home thanks to the coronavirus myth—will study the paper and overturn common errors taken particularly from Victorian times.

Ancient World: I've noticed material on Sumer appearing, and Babylon and Egypt, somewhat along the lines of J H Breasted of Chicago, first published in 1916. And protests against their suppression in American 'World Histories' controlled by Jews. Wars, notably in Iraq, have contributed to this small interest. Jews suppress their histories, stories, myths, and legends, probably because Jews don't like to admit their writings are parasitical. Small note: the idea that the Mediterranean Sea was formed by a deluge through Africa/Spain seems undiscussed.

Ancient World Despite the Renaissance, the rediscoveries of Tacitus and Thucydides, the writings of Gibbon, and Grote on Greece; British education has been starved with centuries of very thin gruel, lightweight discussions on Sparta and mercenaries, Alexander 'the Great', the Roman Empire with shallow generalisations; corresponding more or less to the lightweight material on religion. Hugh Trevor-Roper (=Lord Dacre) thought that reading Julius Caesar was perfect training for 19th-century schoolboys. In the 1940s, Alfred Whitehead praised tolerance, exactly at the time the Judeo-British Empire was collapsing. The childish discussion of 'battle' and 'war' without examination of the causes and effects will I hope be replaced by something more intelligent, and of course is part of the motivation for my writings.

Ancient World Barnes Review 2009, #5 has some material on Greece, both ancient and modern. [ Including Greece, Persia, Macedonia, Athens, and Sparta; and the Ottoman Empire, including the Armenian Christian genocide (1912-1913); and Holocaust Revisionism; and 'Golden Dawn'. Genetic studies on Greece (notably to what extent modern Greeks resemble ancient Greeks) must in my view be in their infancy. I select that publication to exemplify the slow spread of revisionist ideas back in time. ]

c. 300 BC Book of Exodus Andrew Joyce Jan 7 & Apr 8th 2017: ‘... [is] an effort at refuting a Greek and Egyptian consensus on the undesirable behaviors of the Jewish populations in their midst. ... was, and remains, crucial in providing a foundation myth for Jewish victimhood narratives and thus a foundation for the Jewish hoax.’

It may be that Exodus provided practice for subsequent group lying by 'Jews'. Remember the Roman Empire at the eastern Mediterranean did not penetrate far inland, only reaching to mountains and trees. The Phoenician shore (north of 'Jews') was a route linking the sea to the east. Bear in mind the size of the Med—ten times all the U.S. Great Lakes put together. Sidon and Tyre were close to Jews, and had connection with the networks of sea-routes.

An obvious problem with lies is that, if the catchment areas grew, different lies might flourish locally, only to be caught out later. A modern illustration is the Jewish nuclear weapons hoax; if 'Jews' in Israel rely on a supposed nuclear defense, they might be unhappy when it's exposed. By the 21st centuries, there are so many Judaic frauds, such as the Fed, the holohoax, 9/11, anti-Germanism, and anti-white movements, that there may be sudden multiple collapses. Let's hope so.

Those examples are intra-'Jew'. But there are conflicts between 'Jew' and Jew-defined groups of non-Jews. An obvious example is the 'Chosen People' meme, which is generally kept secret from those described by Jews as 'goyim'. One problem is that it is obviously not true, and, if it were true, Jews should not need special treatment.

And there are possible disputes not only within 'Jews', but between non-Jews groups. For example, the 'racial purity' fake is clear both to Jews and non-Jews if they find out about groups of Jews which have interbred. The 'maternal descent' idea is obviously contradicted by genetics, as males must be equally Jewish (or non-Jewish) as females, so however much they may want to hide it, genetically they must be equally 'Jewish'.

[ Russell E Gmirkin’s book demonstrates a heavy literary dependence of Genesis on Berossus’s Babyloniaca (278 BC) and Exodus on Manetho’s Aegyptiaca (ca. 285–280 BC), [and] general reliance of Exodus on literary sources ... at Alexandria’s Great Library. Manetho reported [we are able to piece together much of its contents based on subsequent rebuttals by later Jewish writers such as Flavius Josephus, and also references to the text by several Greek and Greek-Egyptian intellectuals] that centuries earlier a foreign population had entered Egypt’s eastern border via “infiltration of the Delta.” This foreign population subsequently rose in power within Egypt, becoming a burden and a pestilence to the natives. At some point, the foreign population developed a serious disease of the skin, and the Egyptians were finally motivated to expel the invaders, who later relocated to Jerusalem. ]

• THE SUBTEXTS OF 'EXODUS'

was written in Greek, presumably as it was aimed at non-Jews, and Greek was the leading written language in Europe at that time. Exodus is the Latinised form of the title; and the Latin text has been translated many times into more-or-less modern English, but the title 'Exodus' was retained. The word is composite, meaning something like 'way out' in a neutral sense.

BUT the book carries an unstated assumption, a given, an implied truth. Exodus trusts confidently that the actions of its subject group, whatever they were, do not even merit expulsion, much less anything harsher.

It's astonishing to see this attitude persistent through millennia, stuffed and propped up by organised deceptions. To this day, punishments of so-called 'Jews', if they are considered at all, stop with 'expulsion'. And yet entire genocidal wars have been secretly arranged by Jews. There are a few people today who favour reappropriation or execution, but of course the Jewish media censor them—(for example) Alex Linder.

In effect, a subset of people appears to be genetically or by upbringing unable to recognise other's rights. We are in an undeclared war.

That's the subtext of Exodus: plaintive, pleading, deceptive, and cryptically founded on separation for self-described 'Jews'. To this day the US-based ADL expects killing and blame for non-Jews, and exemption from punishment for Jews, for all activities. The book titledwas written in Greek, presumably as it was aimed at non-Jews, and Greek was the leading written language in Europe at that time.is the Latinised form of the title; and the Latin text has been translated many times into more-or-less modern English, but the title 'Exodus' was retained. The word is composite, meaning something like 'way out' in a neutral sense.BUT the book carries an unstated assumption, a given, an implied truth. Exodus trusts confidently that the actions of its subject group, whatever they were, do not even merit expulsion, much less anything harsher.It's astonishing to see this attitude persistent through millennia, stuffed and propped up by organised deceptions. To this day, punishments of so-called 'Jews', if they are considered at all, stop with 'expulsion'. And yet entire genocidal wars have been secretly arranged by Jews. There are a few people today who favour reappropriation or execution, but of course the Jewish media censor them—(for example) Alex Linder.In effect, a subset of people appears to be genetically or by upbringing unable to recognise other's rights. We are in an undeclared war.That's the subtext of Exodus: plaintive, pleading, deceptive, and cryptically founded on separation for self-described 'Jews'. To this day the US-based ADL expects killing and blame for non-Jews, and exemption from punishment for Jews, for all activities.

c. 0 - 400 AD Greek Empire eclipsed by Roman. Decline and Fall of Rome.

There are numerous accounts of Romans vs Jews, usually presented by 'Jews' in their own way. It's important to see that at the time Jews were a distributed nation, not, as with many nations, a territorially-bound collection of people. Hence the violence, stabbings, damage popping up in (say) Cyprus and mentioned by (e.g.) Hilaire Belloc and Arthur Butz.

Christianity allowed after Jews Judaised it and supported an inferior Roman Emperor. Jews waned; Islam was a later 'Abrahamic' invention by Jews to exploit Arabs against whites. A few centuries later, the Khazars were converted, or taken over, or genetically changed by the new 'Judaism'; but were positioned to significantly affect the route between Asia and Europe.

Jews/ Romans: claim from Hilaire Belloc, writing about a century ago. ... the Government of the Roman Empire ... recognized the gulf ... not only by their cruelty to the Jew but also by the privileges they granted him; yet it was always the policy to admit citizenship as the primary distinction. ... His "point" ... in modern slang, was his citizenship, not his Judaism. There is dispute about the number of Jews in Rome, and in the Empire.

c. 400 - 800 AD 'Dark Ages' marked by lack of documentation, evidence, etc. Jewish 'Christianity' infiltrated European countries, trying to impose a connected networks of churches, financed from rents and other impositions, and acting as spies. The process was (and is) kept secret and dark. It must be similar to the present-day subversions by Jews as a world crypto-elite.

• THIS IS A NEW INTERPRETATION - Remember you heard it here first! — though the early Christian part must have been known to the late ancient world



Based on so-called 'Jews' and their behaviour today, it's possible to reconstruct what must have happened to the Roman Empire. How was it replaced by what's called Christianity? Based on so-called 'Jews' and their behaviour today, •

• In about what's now labelled 0 A.D., the Roman Empire had loosely corralled, moved, joined, or otherwise made aware, human and language groups from Spain to Palestine and Slav countries, and from mid-to-north Europe to the Mediterranean and north Africa. It must have been obvious to anyone that new outlooks might change things.

• Early Christians must have been composed of many groups and many influences, including Persian, Babylonian, Egyptian, Greek, Latin and northern mythologies, technological influences such as ships, buildings and food, legal systems, and, importantly, the written word. Papyrus seems to have become cheap and was obviously more portable that stone and baked clay tablets.

• Opinions of their beliefs would have been nothing like Judaic beliefs.

• Traditionally, unrealistic people consider religions to be other-worldly. But it must have been obvious that organisation was necessary, and probably there was competition for bureaucrats wanting settled careers, with speakers and broadcasters, a common language, with reading and writing for messages and accounting, and buildings. Probably Jews saw the opportunity to exploit in the guise of helping. Think of the development of tithes, for example, where the church in effect gets 10% of the net agricultural product.

• Any group which extended over other groups would presumably benefit from a common language, which would be likely to be incomprehensible to most of the members of the groups, tribes, nations. A lingua franca in fact, though Napoleon never quite managed to spread French across the world. Examples include Latin, Greek, Arabic, Russian, and literati Chinese (China was comparable to Europe in size, with as many accents, and mutually-incomprehensible languages). Hebrew, Yiddish (or whatever) was comparable in the sense of being spread among varied countries, but different in being alien and not indigenous, needing secrecy to hide their outlandish nature.

Fairly modern map; the Aral Sea was once larger. Showing likely areas of religious takeovers by Jews. Very roughly (places & names change):

UA =Ukraine, AM =Armenia. R =Rome. C =Constantinople. J =Jerusalem. M =Medina.

Arabs occupied a large area, and were well positioned to take over the remains of the Roman Empire, much of it around the Mediterranean Sea. Note: a silk route between Europe and China went north of the Khazar enclave, marked K . The Khazars had mountain and water barriers to the south, and were well-positioned to act with (or against) Silk Route merchants—and Huns, and Mongols, and the Chinese. And the Kaifeng Jews, visually indistinguishable from Chinese.

The routes also went to and from North Africa. Very roughly (places & names change):=Ukraine,=Armenia.=Rome.=Constantinople.=Jerusalem.=Medina.Arabs occupied a large area, and were well positioned to take over the remains of the Roman Empire, much of it around the Mediterranean Sea.Note: a silk route between Europe and China went north of the Khazar enclave, marked. The Khazars had mountain and water barriers to the south, and were well-positioned to act with (or against) Silk Route merchants—and Huns, and Mongols, and the Chinese. And the Kaifeng Jews,indistinguishable from Chinese.The routes also went to and from North Africa.

Map giving an idea of the slow adoption of national Christianities. Lithuania (14th century) being one of the last. Because of the interdependence with Jews (not called 'Jews' at the time) the map must be related to the penetration of Jews. Probably a parasitic group emerged, after a millennium or two or three of group evolution in Mesopotamian city civilisation , specialising in targeting ruling individuals and small groups, using acting skills and extreme concealment and what many people would regard as psychopathy. It may resemble the present day's 'Jews'—a group of intra-specialists, and a herd who were expected to follow, and almost always did so, including commands to steal and defraud and kill and rape.In about what's now labelled 0 A.D.,It must have been obvious to anyone that new outlooks might change things.Papyrus seems to have become cheap and was obviously more portable that stone and baked clay tablets.Opinions of early Christians (or 'primitive Christians') are mysterious; they have been censored. But the general view seems to be that they felt enlightened, shining, warm, lighted, golden—the word Christ being Greek, connected with gold. The chi-rho symbol of a fish (from the Greek word), and the use of catacombs in Rome, suggests an empire-wide fusion. They may of course never have amounted to much. ButTraditionally, unrealistic people consider religions to be other-worldly. But it must have been obvious that organisation was necessary, and probably there wasin the guise of helping. Think of the development of tithes, for example, where the church in effect gets 10% of the net agricultural product.Any group which extended over other groups would presumably benefit from a common language, which would be likely to be incomprehensible to most of the members of the groups, tribes, nations. Ain fact, though Napoleon never quite managed to spread French across the world. Examples include Latin, Greek, Arabic, Russian, and literati Chinese (China was comparable to Europe in size, with as many accents, and mutually-incomprehensible languages). Hebrew, Yiddish (or whatever) was comparable in the sense of being spread among varied countries, but different in being alien and not indigenous, needing secrecy to hide their outlandish nature.

• Intermission: What were 'pagans' or 'heathens'? Was 'paganism' a religion? Those words are etymologically related to expressions on the countryside. As 'civilization' relates to towns. I'd suggest 'organised religion' is related to bureaucracy, writing, laws, and money. Early religions no doubt had 'holy' or 'sacred' sites, sites with 'genius loci'. Holy wells with fresh or other water, ancient trees, stone circles of great antiquity, objects visible for miles, trackways and paths, Delphi with its Oracle, sites of great (or mythical) wars, burial chambers, perhaps illustrate the sort of thing. But they were, presumably, fragmentary and scattered.

Organised religion involves money, though the tradition has been to ignore and suppress this fact almost completely. But not entirely. Here's J R H Moorman's A History of the Church in England, writing on the thirteenth century: ‘.. A few rectors ... were the wealthy pluralists, mostly scions of illustrious families, who regarded their benefices simply as sources of income, and hired stipendiary priests to do the work. ... Some of these pluralists became immensely rich... The values of livings [paid to vicars] varied enormously in the Middle Ages and for long after. ...’

England is divided into dioceses, each with its town and a bishop, and peripheral staff, but this is the end-point of a long set of processes. The finances are (or were) a very large industry. And much of this may well have been the work of Jews and their collaborators, though the compromises and forced rents and Jewish areas near Cathedrals must have been largely secret. Science and travel and printing have weakened all the foundation, so that, now, the existence of 'Jesus Christ' has been referred to as ‘moonshine’. Ironically, the services actually performed by the Church have remained unanalysed. They include weekly propaganda, like the BBC but before broadcasting was invented. But also records of births, marriages, and deaths.



• About four centuries passed before Christianity became a state religion. This movement must have been taken over by Jews; the process has been analogous in modern Europe, and what became the USA over a similar time period. Essentially, Jews took a chance on inventing a new group which they could secretly run. Probably all the Gospels and Acts were forgeries, designed to implant 'Yeshua' into Christianity, where it did not previously exist. Judging by Jewish techniques now, their documents and preachers and hired followers and thugs would shout down and drown out opposition. Anyone who thinks that this is implausible should examine modern Jewish techniques: the holocaustianity fraud is a good example of persistent, systematic, unremitting blatant lies, believed (because of inherited Jewish instinct) to be undisprovable. Propaganda about Nero is an interesting parallel from the Roman world to propaganda about Hitler now. The 'black legend' about Spain, parallels the vilification of Germany now.

• ‘Christianity’ as invented by Jews must have been shaped by their desires. Having felt the sharp end of Roman power, they would preach self-absorption, other-worldliness, pacifism and 'turning the other cheek', chastity (a white population control method), leaving families, and giving money away.

• Constantine was notorious as an unattractive bastard child with resentments—just the type Jews today prefer as fronts. He may have relied on Jews to support his army.

After Constantine: 'The Roman State ... was almost continually at war until it ceased to exist. The Christian States which succeeded it continued to fight each other, though also ... fought states which were not Christian.' There's a suggestive parallel with the USA today, with endless wars, which Jews use to kill off anyone they think rivals them. Whether they have anywhere to go if the US fails must be something they consider.

• For centuries now, historians and commentators have puzzled over the rise of Christianity: why did nobody try to continue the Roman empire? Why not organise? Why not try to improve matters?—and the parallel with today shows why: Jews are concerned with themselves, and, probably genetically, are programmed to hate rivals. They were not interested in prolonging the system, any more than Jews now want the white world to flourish. A controlled Church suited them. Or at least they moved towards it, with fanatical and imbecilic lack of thought. Jews may have declined, or been killed or thrown out—perhaps a motive for trying the same trick on Arabs, and fleeing to Khazaria.

• Histories since the Middle Ages have attributed the destruction of writings of early Christians to Christians (in the Jew-infected sense) themselves. I'd suggest much of the destruction of documents was a Jewish activity carried out with the concentrated energy of parasites: think of the modern parallels—systematic removal of documents about the First World War, 9/11 destruction of financial records, control of historians over the Holohoax, huge funds to support liars, and systematic standardised lies about foreign wars and foreign criminals. Many Americans at the present day seriously imagine that belief in the mythical 'Christ' figure will stop wars.

• Ever since, there has been tension between local and regional churches, which naturally had some local patriotism, and Jews, lurking in the background, promoting their fake made-up rubbish. For example, the Old Testament was made official in the final assembly of a canon of works, all, absurdly, Jewish. Much of the Middle Ages is a tug or war between lurking Jews, who generally made trouble by fomenting wars, and the more overt Roman and Eastern and Orthodox Churches, who often foolishly took up larger loans than they could possibly afford. Those words are etymologically related to expressions on the countryside. As 'civilization' relates to towns. I'd suggest 'organised religion' is related to bureaucracy, writing, laws, and money. Early religions no doubt had 'holy' or 'sacred' sites, sites with 'genius loci'. Holy wells with fresh or other water, ancient trees, stone circles of great antiquity, objects visible for miles, trackways and paths, Delphi with its Oracle, sites of great (or mythical) wars, burial chambers, perhaps illustrate the sort of thing. But they were, presumably, fragmentary and scattered.Organised religion involves money, though the tradition has been to ignore and suppress this fact almost completely. But not entirely. Here's J R H Moorman's, writing on the thirteenth century: ‘.. A few rectors ... were the wealthy pluralists, mostly scions of illustrious families, who regarded their benefices simply as sources of income, and hired stipendiary priests to do the work. ... Some of these pluralists became immensely rich... The values of livings [paid to vicars] varied enormously in the Middle Ages and for long after. ...’England is divided into dioceses, each with its town and a bishop, and peripheral staff, but this is the end-point of a long set of processes. The finances are (or were) a very large industry. And much of this may well have been the work of Jews and their collaborators, though the compromises and forced rents and Jewish areas near Cathedrals must have been largely secret. Science and travel and printing have weakened all the foundation, so that, now, the existence of 'Jesus Christ' has been referred to as ‘moonshine’. Ironically, the services actually performed by the Church have remained unanalysed. They include weekly propaganda, like the BBC but before broadcasting was invented. But also records of births, marriages, and deaths.About four centuries passed before Christianity became a state religion. This movement must have been taken over by Jews; the process has been analogous in modern Europe, and what became the USA over a similar time period. Essentially, Jews took a chance on inventing a new group which they could secretly run.Anyone who thinks that this is implausible should examine modern Jewish techniques: the holocaustianity fraud is a good example of persistent, systematic, unremitting blatant lies, believed (because of inherited Jewish instinct) to be undisprovable. Propaganda about Nero is an interesting parallel from the Roman world to propaganda about Hitler now. The 'black legend' about Spain, parallels the vilification of Germany now.‘Christianity’ as invented by Jews must have been shaped by their desires. Having felt the sharp end of Roman power, they would preach self-absorption, other-worldliness, pacifism and 'turning the other cheek', chastity (a white population control method), leaving families, and giving money away.—just the type Jews today prefer as fronts. He may have relied on Jews to support his army.After Constantine: 'The Roman State ... was almost continually at war until it ceased to exist. The Christian States which succeeded it continued to fight each other, though also ... fought states which were not Christian.' There's a suggestive parallel with the USA today, with endless wars, which Jews use to kill off anyone they think rivals them. Whether they have anywhere to go if the US fails must be something they consider.now, historians and commentators have puzzled over the rise of Christianity:Why not organise? Why not try to improve matters?—and the parallel with today shows why: Jews are concerned with themselves, and, probably genetically, are programmed to hate rivals.A controlled Church suited them. Or at least they moved towards it, with fanatical and imbecilic lack of thought. Jews may have declined, or been killed or thrown out—perhaps a motive for trying the same trick on Arabs, and fleeing to Khazaria.Histories since the Middle Ages have attributed the destruction ofto Christians (in the Jew-infected sense) themselves.carried out with the concentrated energy of parasites: think of the modern parallels—systematic removal of documents about the First World War, 9/11 destruction of financial records, control of historians over the Holohoax, huge funds to support liars, and systematic standardised lies about foreign wars and foreign criminals. Many Americans at the present day seriously imagine that belief in the mythical 'Christ' figure will stop wars., lurking in the background, promoting their fake made-up rubbish. For example, the Old Testament was made official in the final assembly of a canon of works, all, absurdly, Jewish. Much of the Middle Ages is a tug or war between lurking Jews, who generally made trouble by fomenting wars, and the more overt Roman and Eastern and Orthodox Churches, who often foolishly took up larger loans than they could possibly afford. Denunciations of Jews and usury by the Church look likely to be partly fake: the Roman Church continued to use Jewish money, for example for Cathedrals, so probably the denunciations were intended to keep the Jewish monopoly on coinage and credit and usury. The ‘they killed Jesus’ idea may have been made up to pretend the Church was very anti-Jewish, or to highlight real or supposed differences between Jewish or Christian sects or groups.

[Andrew Joyce, who however does not claim secret mutual support by Jews and Church:– Jews were able to form settlements in Europe only because they were given assistance by the Christian Church in the form of Papal decrees that approved their residence, as well as granting them freedom from efforts at conversion and protection against ‘maltreatment’. Without a Christian theology that taught that Jews possessed a special role in the history of humankind, it is unlikely that Jews would have been able to settle in Europe in the manner they eventually did. (Some of the most influential treatises in this regard were formulated by Bernard of Clairvaux and Thomas Aquinas.) Bernard of Clairvaux 1090-1153; Aquinas b c 1225 in Italy, says Wikipaedia ] Sicut Judaeis—a Latin title, not a full phrase, for many short writings from the Catholic Church to their Catholic community. Despite common misbeliefs, the Catholic Church was allied with Jews, mostly for finance plus related secret operations. The same was true of Protestant Churches. The Judaic victories since 1900 have changed the situation; it seems unlikely that the absurdities in 'Abrahamic' cults can survive among educable peoples.

These comments are from Wikipedia. Note how many of these names are regarded by gullible Catholics as great men, fathers of the Church, etc.

“Around 400, St Augustine, one of the most influential and foundational figures of Catholic theology, preached that the Jews must be protected for their ability to explain the Old Testament.

Around 598 ... Pope Gregory brought Augustine's teachings into Roman Law. He published a bull which became the foundation of Catholic doctrine in relation to the Jews and specified that, although the Jews had not accepted salvation through Christ, and were therefore condemned by God until such time as they accept salvation, Christians were nevertheless duty-bound to protect the Jews as an important part of Christian civilization.

... the bull was reaffirmed by many popes including [Wiki gives dates but it's not clear when the Bulls were issued] Alexander III, Celestine III (1191-1198), Innocent III (1199), Honorius III (1216), Gregory IX (1235), Innocent IV (1246), Alexander IV (1255), Urban IV (1262), Gregory X (1272 & 1274), Nicholas III, Martin IV (1281), Honorius IV (1285-1287), Nicholas IV (1288-92), Clement VI (1348), Urban V (1365), Boniface IX (1389), Martin V (1422), and Nicholas V (1447). ”

• And this state of affairs still applies. At present, Jews have the upper hand, and have changed many tenets of churches unrecognisably; and of course they had the triumph of massacring millions of Orthodox Russians, equivalent perhaps to massacres in north Africa and Cyprus in about 100 AD. The influence of Jews in Turkey and Arabia and Africa is becoming better-known now, with Internet.

• Paradoxically, there is sense in the phrase 'Judeo-Christian', since Jews arranged the forgery of the New Testament.

• We are, now, accustomed to the separation of Church from State: it seems natural that a church should co-exist with people who aren't official religious believers or performers. But it's possible early Jews wanted to rule; maybe they were not powerful or convincing or impressive enough to impose themselves. Considering how the 'Holocaustianity' fraud is being pushed worldwide, I'd guess the unstated aim was to rule—something to bear in mind. In my opinion this separation was most fortunate, since it allowed some scope for creativity and genius. And this state of affairs still applies. At present, Jews have the upper hand, and have changed many tenets of churches unrecognisably; and of course they had the triumph of massacring millions of Orthodox Russians, equivalent perhaps to massacres in north Africa and Cyprus in about 100 AD. The influence of Jews inis becoming better-known now, with Internet.Paradoxically, theresense in the phrase, since Jews arranged the forgery of the New Testament.We are, now, accustomed to theit seems natural that a church should co-exist with people who aren't official religious believers or performers.Considering how the 'Holocaustianity' fraud is being pushed worldwide, I'd guess the unstated aim was to rule—something to bear in mind. In my opinion this separation was most fortunate, since it allowed some scope for creativity and genius.

• Inventing Islam. Jews had writing. The technologies for producing ink (brush or pen) on papyrus, and binding the result, were well worked-out. Jews had plenty of stories to draw on, and a crude philosophy. They must have wanted an army of controllable aggressive thugs, to carry out their own orders. Someone, possibly Jews, invented scripts in such languages as Arabic and Georgian.

• Here's an indication of what Jews felt as the remains of the Roman Empire left little for parasites. Jewish academic Dr. David Wasserstein: "Islam saved Jewry. This is an unpopular, discomforting claim in the modern world. But it is a historical truth. ... First, in 570 AD, when the Prophet Mohammad was born, the Jews and Judaism were on the way to oblivion. And second, the coming of Islam saved them, providing a new context in which they not only survived, but flourished, laying foundations for subsequent Jewish cultural prosperity&mdashalso in Christendom—through the medieval period into the modern world."

Wasserstein is saying—not very clearly—that the army of Muslims were thieves controlled by Jews.

• The Quran or Koran may have been composed by Jews, or on their suggestions. The tradition is that the illiterate Mohammed spent time in a cave, and emerged with writings which were God's words, G-d's words, Allah's words, or whatever. Jews regard themselves as God, rather amusingly, so the tradition may well be accurate in that sense—discussing with Mohammed what he wanted, it must have been easy enough to assemble a pastiche of Jewish material aimed at Arabs, and add to it when circumstances changed. Let's look at supporting evidence.

• The Quran is the first Arab writing of any consequence (unless earlier material was lost or destroyed). This alone suggests that literate foreigners compiled it, in language(s) which need no be Arabic. The script may have been a Jew invention: it is right-to-left. The sounds must have been similar. Vowel sounds were not used; some texts are undotted. The Quran does not use Jewish script, presumably what's now called Hebrew, but Jews would not have wanted Arabs to be able to read their 'sacred' psychopathy.

• The whole point of the Quran must have been to hijack beliefs of Arabs and insert Jewish desires and beliefs, to give Jews themselves some immunity. For example, Abraham was inserted. Otherwise, Arabs were to be as violent and vicious and grasping as possible, with Christians a possible exception, depending on Jewish policies at different times. Of course the Talmud provided many handy examples of viciousness. And of course it provided no examples of unparasitic activity.

• Here are some The Arab was a nomad, not a cultivator, and brought with him ... agricultural disaster. ... The Arab is sometimes called the Son of the Desert, but ... in most cases he is the Father of the Desert, having created it himself, and the arid waste in which he lives and on which practically nothing will grow is the direct result of his appalling indolence, combined with his simian trait of destroying everything he does not understand ... Yet Arabs are withal, the quickest of peoples to follow the call to truth and righteousness. For their natures are relatively simple and free from the distorting effect of bad habits and evil ways ...

• Here's a similarities:

[1] 'Jizya' a permanent tax, sounds Jewish, a bit like central bank control;

[2] 'Taqiyya' resembles 'Kol Nidre';

[3] Death penalty for apostasy;

[4] Ritual cruel animal slaughter;

[5] Food taboos;

[6] Circumcision;

[7] Legal system of a sort;

[8] Ritual killing techniques reserved for enemies;

[9] Child sex;

[10] Prostitution, slavery (still carried out);

[11] Taboos against representative art;

[12] Lunar calendar, presumably because of lack of obvious seasons;

[13] Fanaticism liable to be triggered;

[14] 'Allah will provide' mentality is similar to Jewish parasitic outlook; [15] Singing, chanting.

• But there are differences, which are attributable to Jewish skewing:

[1] Judaism relies on a narrow specialised clique, but Islam can be spread by anyone who can read Arabic.

[2] Islam allows conversion, which of course gets the numbers up, whereas Jews generally prohibit conversion. So much so, that today Muslim populations are huge;

[3] Dysgenic things can be expected to have been inserted into Islam, where there are many genetic diseases—though Judaism has these, too;

[4] Jihad is not explicitly present in Judaism, where deep fanatical grudging hate is nursed, and mass murder run by Jews occurs only when conditions are favourable.

[5] Judaism is usually a minority cult;

[6] Judaism celebrates (usually in secret, on encoded) past triumphs, such as murders. As far as I know, Islam is assumed to be more-or-less without planning or memorials, since historical awareness might lead them to quiz Jews.

[6] One of the reasons for permitting polygyny (up to four 'wives') may be the genetics of sickle-cell anemia (or Thalassaemia) which is lethal if the parents are both carriers. Jews had writing. The technologies for producing ink (brush or pen) on papyrus, and binding the result, were well worked-out. Jews had plenty of stories to draw on, and a crude philosophy. They must have wanted an army of controllable aggressive thugs, to carry out their own orders. Someone, possibly Jews, invented scripts in such languages as Arabic and Georgian.Here's an indication ofWasserstein is saying—not very clearly—that the army of Muslims were thieves controlled by Jews.Theormay have been composed by Jews, or on their suggestions. The tradition is that the illiterate Mohammed spent time in a cave, and emerged with writings which were God's words, G-d's words, Allah's words, or whatever.in that sense—discussing with Mohammed what he wanted, it must have been easy enough to assemble a pastiche of Jewish material aimed at Arabs, and add to it when circumstances changed. Let's look at supporting evidence.Theis the first Arab writing of any consequence (unless earlier material was lost or destroyed). This alone suggests that literate foreigners compiled it, in language(s) which need no be Arabic. The script may have been a Jew invention: it is right-to-left. The sounds must have been similar. Vowel sounds were not used; some texts are undotted. The Quran does not use Jewish script, presumably what's now called Hebrew, but Jews would not have wanted Arabs to be able to read their 'sacred' psychopathy.The, to give Jews themselves some immunity. For example, Abraham was inserted. Otherwise, Arabs were to be as violent and vicious and grasping as possible, with Christians a possible exception, depending on Jewish policies at different times. Of course the Talmud provided many handy examples of viciousness. And of course it provided no examples of unparasitic activity.Here are some comments on these violent tribal cults (too long to be copied here). Here's what may be the naturally evolved state of Arabs:Here's a review of book by Cox & Marks on Islam and 'Liberal Democracies' (i.e. Jew-controlled societies). Too long for inclusion, but note[1] 'Jizya' a permanent tax, sounds Jewish, a bit like central bank control;[2] 'Taqiyya' resembles 'Kol Nidre';[3] Death penalty for apostasy;[4] Ritual cruel animal slaughter;[5] Food taboos;[6] Circumcision;[7] Legal system of a sort;[8] Ritual killing techniques reserved for enemies;[9] Child sex;[10] Prostitution, slavery (still carried out);[11] Taboos against representative art;[12] Lunar calendar, presumably because of lack of obvious seasons;[13] Fanaticism liable to be triggered;[14] 'Allah will provide' mentality is similar to Jewish parasitic outlook; [15] Singing, chanting.But there are, which are attributable to Jewish skewing:[1] Judaism relies on a narrow specialised clique, but Islam can be spread by anyone who can read Arabic.[2] Islam allows conversion, which of course gets the numbers up, whereas Jews generally prohibit conversion. So much so, that today Muslim populations are huge;[3] Dysgenic things can be expected to have been inserted into Islam, where there are many genetic diseases—though Judaism has these, too;[4] Jihad is notpresent in Judaism, where deep fanatical grudging hate is nursed, and mass murder run by Jews occurs only when conditions are favourable.[5] Judaism is usually a minority cult;[6] Judaism celebrates (usually in secret, on encoded) past triumphs, such as murders. As far as I know, Islam is assumed to be more-or-less without planning or memorials, since historical awareness might lead them to quiz Jews.[6] One of the reasons for permitting polygyny (up to four 'wives')be the genetics of sickle-cell anemia (or Thalassaemia) which is lethal if the parents are both carriers. • END OF THIS NEW INTERPRETATION

700 AD very roughly to the present day. Muslims, and the lost Khazar Empire: Note that the combination of a nomadic group, unused to towns, and the opportunities for parasitism, plus the crystallising effect of book-induced inbreeding and hatred of other groups, seem to have combined almost ideally after about 700 AD to produce cults dangerous to all who came into contact with them. The parachuted-in version of 'Judaism' post-dated Islam, though not by much, suggesting that parasitism had become a workable lifestyle preying on static civilisations. Possibly predator-prey relationships will be found, if serious history continues to increase. 711 Start of 'Moors' invading Spain. This seems to have been Jew-financed, possibly because the Visigoths followed Constantinople by not allowing Jews into Iberia. Note that the common slur against 'Vandals' in Andalusia is probably Jewish.

'The classic example of power through fanaticism is the rise of Judaism. The Khan added nothing to the material resources of the Khazars, and yet, within a few years, they had acquired a large empire. Undoubtedly, the religion imposed by the Khan was an essential element in the success of this nation. ...' (Modified to illustrate the point from a passage by Bertrand Russell on Islam in his book 'Power').

[An identical story, about a/the Khazar conversion, has been dated to 1000 AD. If interested, see here, below. The 'Abrahamic' religions seem to have had more conversions and alliances than customary history likes.]

Note added June 2014: David Duke and Kevin MacDonald joined forces in opposing the Khazar hypothesis. David Duke quotes Arthur Koestler, a 'Hungarian Jew' and populariser of the Khazar idea, who hoped that if most Eastern European Jews were descended from the Khazars, the racial basis for anti-Semitism would be removed and anti-Semitism itself could disappear. However, Koestler did little original research, but simply quoted from a number of sources, probably authentic, some very early, on the Khazars (who lived between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea, north of the Caucasus Mountains—which are taller than the Alps). Other books on the subject include a Russian (I think) precursor, Lev Gumilev, head of an ethnographic institute—though I haven't checked Koestler's book. Jews, Khazars, DNA and Jews and Muslims: Similar Tribal Cults look at some of the issues, post-Roman Empire. Kevin MacDonald's work on Jews assumed they were 'Jews' as defined more-or-less Biblically in the USA, and wanted a genetic link, not a discontinuity between two separate groups of 'Jews'. Most 'Jews' seem to have settled down into opposing the Khazar idea, within themselves, by 2014. David Duke claims they promote the Khazar idea for non-Jews (including Michael A Hoffman; his works are all Khazar-based).

This seems a mistake to me. [1] People don't object to Jews because those people are 'anti-Semitic'—itself a crude expression. They object because of behaviour, not the 'racial basis'. Changing the name makes no difference! A Jew by any other name smells the same. [2] A collection of converts may be genetically modified by their influential 'Holy' book(s). [3] There is a controlled experiment here: Islam was influential at roughly the same time, spread widely, and must have had effects promoting inbreeding, fanaticism, and so on in the affected populations. So I see no difficulty with a somewhat isolated tribe, the Khazars, being genetically modified by Talmudic material over a few centuries.

As a thought experiment: if a population were to be suddenly exposed to pornography in large quantities, and were told pornographers were wonderful people worth a lot of money, and pornographers were allowed to expel or kill objectors to pornography, would you expect that population after a few centuries to be well-balanced?

It's possible Duke and MacDonald have a submerged aim in mind: to keep 'Jews' together, and not allow the possibility of their spreading to Europe, or Birobidjan, or Madagascar. With luck, counterattacks like Open Borders for Israel and detailed analysis of Jewish assets will finally weaken them.



• Sarai a city NE of the Black Sea, & NW of the Caspian, was important to Khazaria, the silk route, and Russia

• Marco Polo's Travels said Frances Wood

• Genghis Khan [or many other spellings!] allegedly spared people with useful skills, but slaughtered other types. It seems at least possible that he was influenced by Jews, or Jew types.

• Kublai Khan ... most famous Chinese issuer of paper money ... the Mongol who ruled the Chinese empire in the 13th century. Kublai Khan established currency credibility by decreeing that his paper money must be accepted by traders on pain of death. As further enforcement of his mandate, he confiscated all gold and silver, even if it was brought in by foreign traders. Marco Polo was impressed by the efficiency of the Chinese system, as he chronicles in his The Travels of Marco Polo (Il Milione).

"All these pieces of paper are issued with as much solemnity and authority as if they were of pure gold or silver; and on every piece a variety of officials, whose duty it is, have to write their names, and to put their seals. And when all is prepared duly, the chief officer deputed by the Khan smears the seal entrusted to him with vermilion, and impresses it on the paper, so that the form of the seal remains imprinted upon it in red; the money is then authentic. Anyone forging it would be punished with death. And the Khan causes every year to be made such a vast quantity of this money, which costs him nothing, that it must equal in amount all the treasure of the world."

• Dr Robert Maryks quotes a 'Jew' discussing his 'Sephardic ancestors': Istanbul, Baghdad, Tehran, and through the silk road up to Shanghai .. and Palermo and Trabia in Sicily...' Just an example. Probably Jewish control over 20th century media suppressed any mention of Jews in China, and their activities.

Just a guess: frizzy hair may indicate long-term interbreeding and crypsis in China. And 'Jews' are not in fact 'a race'. And see below... a city NE of the Black Sea, & NW of the Caspian, was important to Khazaria, the silk route, and Russiasaid Frances Wood may well be spurious [or many other spellings!] allegedly spared people with useful skills, but slaughtered other types. It seems at least possible that he was influenced by Jews, or Jew types.... most famous Chinese issuer of paper money ... the Mongol who ruled the Chinese empire in the 13th century. Kublai Khan established currency credibility by decreeing that his paper money must be accepted by traders on pain of death. As further enforcement of his mandate, he confiscated all gold and silver, even if it was brought in by foreign traders. Marco Polo was impressed by the efficiency of the Chinese system, as he chronicles in his).Dr Robert Maryks quotes a 'Jew' discussing his 'Sephardic ancestors':

c 900 AD Some 'Jewish' bloodlines made their way to faraway lands including Norway and France. Normandy was ceded to the 'Norseman' Rolf the Ganger, 'Rollo', 'leader of the Vikings', in the treaty of Saint-Claire-Sur-Epte with Charles the Simple. The family of Rolf took the name 'Sinclair' from this treaty. William the Conqueror was Rolf's great great great grandson. The Sinclairs founded Freemasonry. So here we have supposed 'northmen' who opened up England to the Jews. [Brief unsourced online comment from thruthebook, 29 June 2016].

[ Start of 'Real Jewish Studies' | Top of Page: Truths about Judaism ]

c 1000 - c 1500 Expulsions of Jews. This very much shortened list is from Frank Britton's booklet, the source probably being the Encyclopaedia Britannica of the time.

BUT—IMPORTANT—Migrations and infiltrations of Jews are rarely noted. Kevin MacDonald for example estimates two million moved to the USA by about 1900.

ENGLAND: Jews expelled in 1290 by Edward I. Not permitted to re-enter till 1655. (SCOTLAND an exception)

FRANCE: Expelled in 1306 by Philip the Fair/ Philippe le Bel. A few were permitted to return but were again evicted in 1394. Jewish settlements remained in Bordeaux, Avignon, Marseilles, (from where they were evicted in 1682) and in the northern province of Alsace.

SAXONY: Expelled in 1349.

BRABANT Execution of all Jews in Brussels for poisoning wells. (Not in Britton).

HUNGARY: By 1092 the Jews were in control of Hungary's tax collections. In 1360 they were expelled but later returned. In 1582 they were again expelled from the Christian part of Hungary.

BELGIUM: Expelled in 1370. A few settled there again in 1450, but no large numbers came till 1700.

SLOVAKIA: Ousted from Prague in 1380. Many settled there again after 1562. In 1744 Marie Theresa expelled them again.

AUSTRIA: Expelled in 1420 by Albrecht V.

NETHERLANDS: Expelled from Utrecht in 1444.

SPAIN: Expelled in 1492. Included e.g. SICILY.

LITHUANIA: Expelled in 1495 by Grand Duke Alexander. They later returned.

PORTUGAL: Expelled in 1498.

PRUSSIA: Expelled in 1510.

ITALY: Expelled from Kingdom of Naples and Sardinia in 1540.

BAVARIA: Banned permanently in 1551.

SCANDINAVIA: Jews were not permitted to enter Sweden until 1782. None were permitted to enter Denmark before the 17th century and they were not allowed in Norway after 1814.

The exception was POLAND, very likely because of large Khazar presence there after the Khazar conversion, and Turkey, ditto: 'Largely as a result of the concessions of the Polish crown which began with the Statute of Kalisz, Poland became known throughout Europe as the "paradisus Judeorum," the paradise of the Jews. ... who ... inevitably headed east toward Poland, taking their language, "juedische Deutsch," or Yiddish with them.' NB Poland seems to have been rich in silver ore, at least if modern mining patterns applied then. [Note: I've seen no discussion as to whether the Poles realised they may be making a big mistake importing aliens.-RW]

Important note: Jewish policy is essentially parasitic, and a hit-and-run strategy is an example of this. It's possible some 'expulsions' were in fact Jews moving, taking loot with them, and falsely claiming to have been thrown out. Or 'expulsions' may have been secretly agreed, Jews escaping punishment for murders. Such agreements might well have included payments from Jews. The invention and enforcement of paper money altered Jewish strategy: in modern Europe, Jewish strategy is to ruin e.g. Belgium, France, and Sweden, then move out, claiming to have been driven out.

The best-known example is perhaps the expulsion of Jews from Spain and Portugal, often stated to have taken 700 years. Ask yourself if it is sheer coincidence that the move out coincided with the discovery of the Americas and the rise of the Netherlands.

'Wandering Jew' seems to have had several implications. For example, any mobile or displaced group may have been called 'Jews', or may have called themselves 'Jews'. The etymology of 'Jew', and the ways the word was used as printing became established, and the ways the word was used in religious speech and writings, appear to be contentious—but it's difficult to be sure even if the issue is genuinely contentious.

10th - 12th centuries, straddling 1000 AD. A passing remark by Miles W Mathis (in his benito.pdf and phillip.pdf) is '... Burgundians in my recent paper on the Crusades: ... had been Jewish from way back, being captured by Jewish lines even before the year 1000. This reminded me of Ganshof on Feudalism starting in Burgundy, and suggests Jews may have invented parts of the 'Feudal System'.

[Ganshof: '... Feudalism may be conceived of as a form of society possessing well-marked features which can be defined without difficulty. They may be summarized as follows: a development pushed to extremes of the element of personal dependence in society, with a specialized military class occupying the higher levels in the social scale; an extreme subdivision of the rights of real property; a graded system of rights over land created by this subdivision and corresponding in broad outline to the grades of personal dependence just referred to; and a dispersal of political authority amongst a hierarchy of persons who exercise in their own interest powers normally attributed to the State and which are often, in fact, derived from its break-up.

This type of society, whether one calls it 'feudalism' or the 'feudal régime', was that of western Europe in the tenth, eleventh and twelfth centuries. It came into existence in France, Germany, the kingdom of Burgundy-Arles and Italy, all of them states deriving from the Carolingian empire, and in other countries--England, certain of the Christian kingdoms of Spain, the Latin principalities of the Near East--which passed under their influence. ...']

1030 As part of the apparently Jewish-controlled spread of Christianity, one country at a time, networking the countries with parishes and claiming rent, Norwegian King Olaf II was reported killed by Thorir Hund at Stiklestad. Olaf was relabelled a 'saint': saints were not typically holy or honest etc, but military or other victors. This event was just one example of the spread of Christianity by ships and money and violence.

1066 Understood as a principal date in English history. There are many other important dates; it must be a propagandist fact. A revisionist view is that William 'the Bastard'—note the surname suppression—was Jewish, and the 'Norman' Invasion a Jewish event, probably preceded by a feint with Norwegians attacking in the north to weaken the English army. The small size of the invasion suggests there must have been collaborators. Might be compared with Jews in Russia after 1917, and 'Communists'—the 'harrying of the north' having genocidal population-killing effects, and the Domesday Book a bureaucratic list of assets. 1086 is the usual date of the Domesday Book, also known as the Liber de Wintonia (book of Winchester, in the approximately Roman form), as Wintonia was the Norman administrative capital. It seems reasonable to regard the record as in Jewish style.



Ramaphosa Ramaphosa

very approx 1090-1200 Assassins may represent another genetically violent and parasitic group, based on Judaic or Moslem or other attitudes and/or writings. They are supposed to have been an Islamic splinter-group or cult, with intense internal propaganda, and with members who were killers of rival Islamic leaders. Based near the Caspian Sea, in the extreme south-east of the Khazar empire, they seem to have been erased by the Mongols.



Netanyahu and his father.

Why so-called 'Jews' may be referred to as 'Turco-Mongol'. Note that Khazars Netanyahu and his father.Why so-called 'Jews' may be referred to as 'Turco-Mongol'. Note that Khazars (see this tribe as converts to Judaism) may have helped Mongols invade Europe, just as they helped Moslems invade Europe earlier, and later.

['Curmudgeon' in TheOccidentalObserver, Jan 2017, states that Khazars (see this group as converts to Judaism) co-operated with Mongols in invading Europe—something obvious enough once it's pointed out.]

1242 France Burns All Known Copies of the Talmud Headline in a Jewish online source, soon after the Notre Dame destruction. Bear in mind the Talmud was not for 'goyim' eyes. I'd suggest that such cases were intended to prevent study by the 'goyim' and were not prompted by horror at the contents.

c. 1280 Ramon Martí Pugio fidei adversus Mauros et Iudaeos 'The Dagger of Faith' by a Catalan Dominican friar, Raymond Martini—I take it, in Latin. [ As is usual with Jews, it's not possible to get an accurate summary of Martí's book, which must have existed in manuscript form until printing came along. It had three parts, the second and third of which are 'anti-Jewish', the 'last part' (which could be the whole of the third path, but perhaps may be a final portion) containing ‘extracts from the Talmud, the Midrash, and later rabbinical writings (Rashi, etc.)’ This book ‘became the most important and widely circulated medieval anti-Jewish polemic’. I have quoted from encyclopedia.com which draws from three encyclopedias, which I think are online, but no longer in paper versions. It's not credible they could be very reliable on such subjects. Without seeing such books it's impossible to assess even their style of argument. Often they turn out to be disappointing. But the 13th century may be the high point of Roman Catholic success, they may have felt strong and independent, given their financial co-evolutions. As contrasted with their present-day subservience. ]

c 1340 - c 1700 The Black Death peak mid-1300s?) and Plagues are of course not well documented or researched. However, it ought to be mentioned that there may have been Jewish involvement. [ Hans Zinnser's 1935 Rats, Lice and History is mostly about typhus, and anecdotal rather than historical; Zinsser is described as American. The 1910-11 Encyclopædia Britannica has no separate entry for 'Black Death'; the entry 'Plague' was jointly written by Arthur Shadwell, who wrote on malaria, cancer, London's water, etc, and Harriet L Hennessy, a physician and pharmacologist. 18th and 19th century plagues are detailed, and the 15th and 16th represented by ten works, 4 from Venice, two from Basel. The Plague of London 1665-1666 and the 'Great Fire' are suspiciously close to the Bank of England importation. Note that, unlike many epidemics, plague 'cannot be traced with certainty to definite time and place'. Amazingly, the 1976 Encyclopædia Britannica has no entries under Black Death (though it has for 'Black Muslims'), or Plague, and nothing noticeable under Disease. The Micropædia has a few entries under Black Death, but only a reference to the novel by Camus under 'Plague'! The topics have fallen into the world of hack writers. ]

c 1400 - c 1600 The Reformation. Starting with translations of the Bible. It's not known, or not clear, to what extent this was a Jewish movement. Note however the important division right through the movement. Luther, having read Jewish 'holy' books, became anti-Jewish. On the other hand some states were undecided: the Netherlands, first, then England, became Protestant and were more-or-less Jewish invaded, as the prospects for the New World became clear, and seaports were sought. Though of course this process took time, and was not completed in Britain until Cromwell's death, after which the Restoration of the Monarchy as it was called—the status quo before Jews was not restored—made things look somewhat as before, plus such organisations as the Bank of England.

1492 Ferdinand & Isabella's 'Reconquista' of Spain from the Moors more-or-less complete. And from Jews, though possibly the 'expulsion' of Jews was in fact their decision to leave, when their Muslim thug army was forced out. Here's an extract from mileswmathis.com/pirate.pdf:

At the end of the fifteenth century, many Jews 'had to flee' Spain and Portugal. The most adventurous among them took to the seas as freewheeling outlaws. In ships bearing names such as the Prophet Samuel, Queen Esther, and Shield of Abraham, they attacked and plundered the Spanish fleet while forming alliances with other European powers to ensure the safety of Jews living in hiding. ...

[T]hese Jewish pirates of the Caribbean came from... the Iberian ("Hebrew") peninsula. In other words, they were Sephardim/ Sfard/ Srdn/ Sidonians/ Phoenicians. The book Jewish Pirates of the Caribbean by Edward Kritzler [obviously, there's little chance of this source being reliable-RW] centers on Jamaica ... Jewish merchants were closely linked to ... much of the piratic activity out of Port Royal, Jamaica ... in the late 17th century. Port Royal was known as the "wickedest city in the world" ... What's less known ... is that Jews controlled Port Royal. The main thoroughfare of the city was called Jews Street!

Presumably, the 'wickedest city' included brothels, forced sex, and so on. Note also the comparison of Atlantic pirates with Atlantic slave-ships, also run by Jews. The 'skull and crossbones' or 'skull and bones' seems to date from this period. Port Royal was reported to be largely destroyed by an earthquake, in 1692, though this date seems uncomfortably numerically significant and coincident with convenient destruction. It's likely that the 'Counter-Reformation' was Jewish-propelled (by Loyola; 'Jesuits' founded 1540), and the 'Reformation' too. In each case, Jewish interests would be subtly inserted into the non-religious power groups which they influenced. One such interest of course was war between non-Jews.

c 1500 - c 1650 Western Europe supposedly largely free of Jews. When people discuss Jews in (say) Venice, Italy, or Spain, bear in mind this 150-year hiatus. If in fact it's true. No doubt there is an intimate connection with the immense flowering of the Renaissance in Europe. And no doubt a connection with the finance of wars and their locations.

1509-1547 Henry VIII of England. Died young; and something like 7 illegitimate children, and 9 others most of whom died during pregnancy. There's obvious scope for skulduggery.

Remember that 'Jews' and Muslims had been expelled from Spain; but 'Spain' still consisted of regions. Catherine 'of Aragon', had her children survived, might have led to England, Spain, and Portugal dividing the new world among them. Remember in the Caribbean Jews ran pirate ships against the Spanish.

There's a lot of evidence for Jewish poisonings and assassinations. These are most efficient where one death can e.g. change an entire line of royalty by murder or marriage. Look up for example Lithuania. Modern lesser equivalents are changing ownership of a company, marrying a business leader, outvoting non-Jews, inserting Jews into positions such as Attorney General and Supreme Court member and Speaker of Houses, inserting Jews into political control such as the EU mechanism, not just parties..

1519-1523 The Papacy which supported the printing (and circulation) of the finest edition of the Talmud ever published in recorded history, the magnificent Bomberg edition, which it is fair to say permanently rescued the Talmud from the possibility of extinction. (From Michael Hoffman II's The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome). It was printed in Venice, and in Hebrew. I don't know whether (e.g.) vowel sounds were included.

1522 the twelfth of October, when that noble knight Andrea d'Amaral, your patron saint, threw open the gates of Rhodes to the Turk from Jean Raspail's Camp of the Saints. [ Most English-speaking whites have no idea of the prolonged history of Jews permitting invasions. Just one specimen ]

1534 Foundation of the Jesuits about this time. I'd suggest the Iberian (Spanish & Portuguese) Jews and crypto-Jews wanted to try to control the Reformation and Counter-Reformation and this group was part of the policy. Jews of course would want to prolong the absurdities of 'Roman' Catholicism, many aspects of which worked to their advantage.

[Edmund Campion, who after questioning, torture, and four public disputations was killed in 1581, only about ten days after his trial. He had joined the Jesuits in 1573. I'd suggest Jews and the Anglicans conspired to remove him. If you're interested in all this, try to identify remarks in Campion and others which Anglicans and Jews, and Catholics, would dislike.]

1555 Rome Ghetto was established in 1555 in the Rione Sant’Angelo, near the Tiber River in the southern part of Campo de’Fiori. Its borders were laid down in a Papal Bull along with various discriminatory laws about what professions Jews could and could not hold. One of the accepted professions, that of selling fish, still lends its name to streets in the area of the old fish market. Though the neighborhood now commands some of the highest property prices in Rome, the original Jewish Ghetto (known simply as the Roman Ghetto) was walled-in and crowded.—from an online tourism website.

1572 St Bartholomew's Day Massacre in France. Revisionist-minded people might consider reframing old-style Jew-denying history to include hypotheses involving Jews.

And here's a good one, from Miles Mathis: ‘The King [Henry II of France] was more likely poisoned. ... we find a strange reaction from Montgomery, who had up to that time been savagely repressing Huguenots in the Scotch Guard: he joined them and waged war against France. I suggest he was chosen as a scapegoat for the King's death and didn't appreciate it. I also suggest that with the murder of his King, he became aware of what the Medici faction was up to: it had just performed a successful coup through the Queen [Catherine de' Medici]. So Montgomery's war wasn't against France, it was against the Medicis. He should be seen as a hero. This means the religious wars of that period have been sold to us under a false pretext. We are told it was between the Catholics and the Protestants. But seeing that Paris was ruled by the Jewish Medicis, we see it was a war of the Medicis against the Christian Church more broadly. Catherine ordered the rich Huguenots murdered in the St. Bartholomew's Day massacre not because they were Protestant, but because they were prominent aristocrats and Christian. ... it "printed on Protestant minds the indelible conviction that Catholicism was a bloody and treacherous religion".

That's convenient for the Medicis, right? We see that these religious wars did double duty: 1) getting rid of rich aristocrats whose properties could then be seized, 2) blackwashing Catholicism by making Catholics look like the bad guys. But ... it wasn't really Catholics ordering the Huguenot genocide: it was the Medicis. The history of France has been rewritten by Jewish "scholars".’

Mathis does not add that both Christian sides may have known this, but said nothing, suggesting Christianity was itself subordinate to Jewish money.

1585-1604 Anglo-Spanish War (that link is to Shakespearean sceptic's writings) looks to me like an indirectly provoked war, probably by Jews, in the same way the Germans and Russians were forced into war by Jews 350 years later. [ I'd like interested people to see if they can find evidence for that, bearing in mind that Spain and Portugal had expelled Jews, and England supposedly had none, so Jews could be expected to be hostile and have their eyes on gold from South America. And Jews owned slaving ships. ]

?1604-1657 Menasseh ben Israel/ Manoel Dias Soeiro. Described as an influential Portuguese Rabbi. Well-known for negotiating with Oliver Cromwell to take over England's money supply—in effect I suppose by weakening England by funding civil war, and getting Charles I killed, with money from other parts of the Jewish 'empire', then debasing the currency and impoverishing the country.

And known to favour Jewish intrusions by poison, recommending Jews should become apothecaries for that purpose. Perhaps Henry VIII was a victim.

1605 'Tsar Fyodor Borisovich Godunov son of Tsar Boris Godunov, ruled less than a year as Feodor II after his father's death in 1605; murdered in June the same year.' [ Speculative comment: it seems possible that a Jewish movement deposed the Godunov dynasty to substitute a Jewish dynasty. ]

1611 King James Bible published. English translation, of huge influence; to this day, simple Americans think Enoch invented writing, and 'Jews' were chosen by 'God', and that 'commandments' were issued on stone tablets. Parables, Psalms, and the supposed history of the World including 'Noah's Ark' and 'The Flood', and the use of archaic forms to hide simple ideas are part of the legacy. This must have been propagandist in intention. Note that the first English government colonies started from about 1607 in Virginia and Jamestown (named after the 'Virgin Queen' Elizabeth, and her successor, King James of Scotland).

[ In Spanish translation, La Biblia of 1569/revised 1602 is more-or-less equivalent to the KJV, but pre-dates it. In French, the first printed La Bible was even earlier, in 1530. No doubt there was some connection with Jacques Cartier and Canada, though there must have been large numbers of connections between local languages (Catalan, Basque, Breton, Welsh, ...), and the larger European languages (Dutch, Portuguese ...), and new colonies.

In the 'New Testament', Matthew 4:7 includes 'Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God.' An Italian edition says 'Non tentare il Signore Dio tuo.' A German translation is: «Du sollst Gott, deinen Herrn, nicnt versuchen.» A French equivalent is: 'Tu ne tenteras point le Seigneur, ton Dieu.' A modern Spanish edition gives: 'También está escrito: "NO TENTARAS AL SEÑOR TU DIOS." I quote these to show what a small-scale 'God' was regarded as suitable for most people; a local ('feudal') lord, but not a magnificent world-ruling monarch. ]

1614 Heythrop College '... specialist philosophy and theology college of the University of London located in Kensington ... the oldest constituent college of the federal University of London, having been founded in 1614 by the Society of Jesus. ... ceased operations on 31 January 2019'. Michele Renouf started a course here, but found it dominated by 'Jews'. Just one of numerous more or less secret 'educational' places.

1534-1620 Japan banned Christianity expelling the Jesuits, following warnings by a sea captain, shipbuilder and navigator, William Adams. That's how it's usually stated. I'd like to suggest what happened may rather have been connected with Jews attempting to get access to Japan, since the Jesuit founders appear to have been 'marrano' Jews from Spain, deliberately mislabelling their scheme..

1618-1648 'Thirty Years War' is still described as a religious war between Catholics and Protestants. The accounts I've seen omit Jews, in particular the networking aspect—'Court Jews' are assumed to be isolated, and 'communities' ditto, when of course their danger was of calling up reserves from other Jews. Another omission is of the manufacture, supply, and payments of weapons. Gunpowder and proto-steel being important.

Easy transport and distribution were in the future; serious students might try to assess weapons and gunpowder manufacture as local monopolies. We're familiar now with the idea that Jews loaned to both sides in wars, but probably this developed slowly from more localised suppliers.

The devastation was immense, apparently comparable with the US 'civil war' and 20th century world wars, though localised in Europe. There are endless small details of battles, which are useful in hiding the overview. It is said that, amid the devastation, Jewish houses were left untouched. Here's Joseph McCabe, ex-Roman Catholic but Jew-naive author, on the Thirty Years War. The links with Jews are still suppressed, of course. Note the possible parallels with World War 1 and World War 2, including atrocity realities and frauds.

1650 Birth of Dutch William or William of Orange. (Orange is an area of the Netherlands).

[ He was too young to have participated in the Amsterdam Synagogue scheme for the 'Bank of England'. King of England, Ireland, and Scotland 1689-1702. 1688 'Glorious Revolution': there was a Dutch Invasion; the meme that "England was only ever invaded in 1066" is false. It's easy to miss. The 'Civil War/s' will I hope come to be renamed 'The Jewish War' or something similar Dutch connections with Jews: the Dutch East Indies exploitation; the Amsterdam diamond market; Amsterdam prostitution; the frantic resistance to Hitler during WW2, resulting in their being bombed; participation in the Ann Frank fraud; use of Dutch airspace to supply Israel (see 1992 cargo plane crash); the Islamic connections of Geert Wilders; the availability of 'welcome the stranger' invasion supporters. Boers despite being Dutch in origin are ignored, no doubt because of Jewish hate of whites. ]

1655 Demurrer by William Prynne argued against Jewish admission. Prynne is now usually dismissed as a Puritan fanatic who hated the theatre.

1660-1670 incl Diaries of Samuel Pepys. These were written in shorthand. I suspect, by various clues—even the name—that Pepys was a spy, perhaps a one-man Mass Observation, whose job was to watch for Jew-aware people and movements in London of the time. The diaries are supposed (after three hundred years or so) to have been transcribed correctly. I'd be surprised if this is true.

1661 Cromwell's body disinterred and his mummified head, with two other regicides, displayed on a pole. Only about five years after Cromwell gave Jews a foothold in England.

1664 New Amsterdam renamed New York. Anglo-Dutch Wars, probably some Jewish fake of some sort, were about now and no doubt part of the takeover of both England and north America. Part of the 'Jewish' moves into the New World.

1665 Official Gazette claims to have been established in this year.

1666 In England, the 'Great Fire' seems to have been a land-clearance scheme by fire, after which the Jewish 'Bank of England' was constructed attributed falsely to disgruntled people. See also the Cestui Que Vie Act complete with bilingual confusion and substitution of 'state', or at least private corporation, for monarchy.

[ It occurs to me that 'livery companies' of which were 12 'major' may well have been precursors of so-called Freemasons. 'Fishmongers Hall', site of a false flag on 30 Nov 2019, suggested this rather obvious idea to me. (Thanks to 'Hoaxashian'). Here's a website: ‘The Livery Companies of London ran in a similar way to the guilds, they had accumulated property and possessed magnificent halls. Charters were granted to them in return for large sums of money advanced to the national exchequer by the Companies. ... The 12 major Livery Companies are listed in order of precedence, as decided by the Lord Mayor of London in 1515: Mercers [traders in many well-defined types of item], Grocers, Drapers, Fishmongers, Goldsmiths, Merchant Taylors, Skinners, Haberdashers, Salters, Ironmongers, Vintners, Clothworkers.’ It's obvious that builders, stoneworkers, designers, churchmen are not included. Nor are timber, fuel, meat. This is a tiny survey, excluding other Livery Companies, Guilds, and other 'professions' of the time, but it's certainly possible that 'Freemasons' were a covert Jew arrangement using protective mimicry to gain entry, and other things, no matter how important, did not need much finance to oil their wheels. Anglo-Saxon Guilds seem to have been a precursor. Note that these all seem to have had a religious component, in practice no doubt basically Christian and Jewish, the proportion depending on events at the time. Perhaps, like conversion, it started in Kent. Censorship of Jewish matters is immense, but perhaps if the myths fall we'll see floodlights shone of n the real workings of our mediaeval cities. ]

1675 Astronomer Royal established (and the Royal Observatory at Greenwich, on the Thames, east of London. Mainly concerned with navigation of the seas; which needed fairly exact identification of position, and not only at sea. The first astronomer Royal was Flamsteed. My personal guess is that we was Dutch and had contacts with Dutch Jews.

1685 Death of Charles II aged 54. It's possible, in fact likely, that his exit was intentionally helped by his 'medical' treatment.

1688 Glorious Revolution of England, Scotland, Ireland, Wales. Final takeover by a Protestant monarchy. There was a document read out or announced by King William II in the Hague, giving reasons for his dislike of James II. I don't know how the sobriquet as popularised. But churchmen liked it, as the basis of the odd combination of arrogance, wealth, indifference to large non-church issues, and superstition (and silent support for Jews) characterising the Church of England.

[ What follows was written as late as 1991, Chairman of the Parochial Clergy Association: 'In speaking of the foundations of our liberties the Prince of Orange refers to King James II.'s high-handed and arbitrary action:' and lots more. It's unsurprising that the C of E liked the 'Glorious Revolution' as they had more money, saved from Rome. True, the costs to Jews impoverished much of the rest of the country. True—more recently—huge wars had wrecked Europe, and there allegedly were nuclear weapons as a constant threat. But this clown asked 'that mercy may walk hand-in-hand with justice. Most Clergy are aware of God's call...'. The oratorical self-deception is Jewish.]

c 1500 - c 1700 Henry VIII had re-introduced interest—or abandoned the effort of concealment—and plundered the monasteries; there was new gold and silver from the New World; and new expensive armaments. Earlier finances in Italy and Germany faded. This set the stage for Jewish movement to Britain from the Netherlands and from Venice, under Cromwell: Britain was nearer the New World, and had many ports for ships. Probably the Bank of England was built after deliberate fire clearance in London. And probably the decline of the Hanseatic League followed and was planned. War devastated German states: 1618-1648 'Thirty Years War' is another revisionist topic. And in the following century enclosures improved farming, but not ordinary peoples' lives. ...

c. 1650-1750 The 'Enlightenment' (see my review of Voltaire's Age of Louis XIV) in retrospect is a Jewish movement, part economic, partly using violence, and partly propagandist. Voltaire—or a group under that typically Jewish-style fake name—was the leading name.

I just found a comment on the 'Enlightenment' in Tanstaafl, dated 20 Oct 2019 (after my comment). Note that there's a science-nonscience split among commentators. Boyle, Newton & Leibniz, and of course many others, fell into that century; so far as I know, they had little or no input from Jews. I hope this helps in examining the 'Enlightenment', and of course the German Aufklärung, dominated by Goethe. The Aufklärung may probably have been suggested by the Renaissance, which seems to have been Jew-free; of course Jews would want to mimic it, and of course in a pro-Jew deceptive sense. This seems to have been what happened—note that the German word preceded the English word, which in any case was scarcely used before the 'Great War', WW1, and before large-scale Jewish infiltration.



Aufklarung in German 1700-1950 Enlightment in English 1700-1950

c. 1500-1880 The revisionist process now is extending back through time, and this process will I hope continue and professionalise. Religious writers on Jews include

• Martin Luther (short book on Jews, 1543ish)

• Johann Eisenmenger (two-volume Entdecktes Judenthum (1711ish). (A downloadable 1743 (or 1742, or 1748!) 2-vol work possibly based on Eisenmenger is RABINICAL LITERATURE: OR, THE TRADITIONS OF THE JEWS, Contained in their TALMUD and other Mystical Writings...).

• Dr Alexander McCaul said by Michael Hoffman to be a devastating 19th-century critic of the Talmud. (See later).

[Metapedia once had a List of Books about the Jewish Question]



Some online sites used by mileswmathis.com

Genealogies, names, families ancestry.com | www.avotaynu.com* | burkespeerage.com* | geni.com [NB Jewish] | ethnicelebs.com ['celebrities'] | findagrave.com [last resting places] | fabpedigree.com [ancients; non-authoritative] | familysearch.org | genealogieonline.nl/en/ | Genealogy.com | geneanet.org [Genealogies] | myheritage.com [NB Jewish?] | home.rootsweb.ancestry.com | thepeerage.com* | wargs.com ['William Addams Reitwiesner Genealogical Services'] | wikipedia.com | WikiTree.com [free family trees] | | Archives, Books archive.org | books/google.com | | Popular Beliefs, enquiries, questions justanswer.com | litreactor.com [writing info e.g. researching legal jargon] | revolvy.com | semiticcontroversies | truecrimelibrary.com [crimelibrary.com has vanished] | urbanlegends.about.com | vhs62.com vellejo high school 62 yearbooks | wikia.com ['fans' of mass 'culture'] | | *Seem relevant, but I think not used

Important: I'm not suggesting these sites are user-friendly, or even able to explain what they do: they are in the established tradition of computer opacity ancestry.com | www.avotaynu.com* | burkespeerage.com* | geni.com [NB Jewish] | ethnicelebs.com ['celebrities'] | findagrave.com [last resting places] | fabpedigree.com [ancients; non-authoritative] | familysearch.org | genealogieonline.nl/en/ | Genealogy.com | geneanet.org [Genealogies] | myheritage.com [NB Jewish?] | home.rootsweb.ancestry.com | thepeerage.com* | wargs.com ['William Addams Reitwiesner Genealogical Services'] | wikipedia.com | WikiTree.com [free family trees] | |archive.org | books/google.com | |justanswer.com | litreactor.com [writing info e.g. researching legal jargon] | revolvy.com | semiticcontroversies | truecrimelibrary.com [crimelibrary.com has vanished] | urbanlegends.about.com | vhs62.com vellejo high school 62 yearbooks | wikia.com ['fans' of mass 'culture'] | | *Seem relevant, but I think not usedI'm not suggesting these sites are user-friendly, or even able to explain what they do: they are in the established tradition of computer opacity

1666 Western Turkey/ Eastern Greece: Messianic movement spread among Jews. (They supposedly await a Messiah to 'deliver' them. Or something.) The Torah appears to claim that there will be an actual person, who will appear either when every Jew is 'good', or every Jew is evil. So why not all be evil? Apparently it had a lot of effect, but I'm unwilling to claim any factual evidence.

1698 Allegedly the first real or supposed anti-Masonic leaflet in London. [ Having thought it needful to warn you of the Mischiefs and Evils practiced in the Sight of GOD by those called Freed Masons, I say take Care lest their Ceremonies and secret Swearings take hold of you; and be weary that none cause you to err from Godliness. For this Devilish Sect of Men are Meeters in secret which swear against all without their Following. They are the Anti Christ which was to come leading Men from Fear of GOD. ... Set forth as a Warning to this Christian Generation by M Winter, and Printed by R. Sare at Gray’s Inn-gate, in Holborn. 1698. ]

1707–1709 Charles XII of Sweden and allies in war against Russia. Charles XII was young and no doubt ignorant. I think the 18th century was the start of the era of war as a stock exchange/ gambling/ spectator/ weapons and equipment/ funding operation. (Waterloo has been identified as a war where both sides faced cannon made by the same company). Educated Victorians knew battle formations in great detail. But costs of weapons, transport, funding etc were not generally known. It's possible, or likely, that international Jews on both sides were at their games.

c 1700 - c 1800 18th century with improved science and technology (Newton, later Lavoisier, and many others. See my review of a book on John Hunter for the intellectual atmosphere, and the unnoticed intrusions of Jews) led to the disaster of Napoleon. However, there were extensive discussions on Jews, which later were ignored and suppressed. But enough is left to be able to reconstruct the debates and have some idea of omissions. Jewish names include Mendez da Costa and Sampson Gideon; opponents in England include Sir John Barnard, the Earl of Egmont, Sir Edmund Isham; the main contention was on 'Naturalization'.

1717 Oct 31st (Hallowe'en) Freemasonry: United Grand Lodge of England allegedly founded. I take the date from Oct 31st 2017, allegedly the 300th anniversary. Note that Eisenmenger's 2-volume work was published in about 1711; perhaps this work added to Jew urgency.

1720-1723 John Trenchard's and Thomas Gordon's Cato's Letters air republican ideas.

Swift, Henry St John Lord Bolingsbroke and Trenchard and Gordon, the South Sea Bubble etc: complain of parasites and fight back correctly, yet never call the Jew out by his name.

1729 Daniel Defoe / de Foe The Compleat Gentleman in manuscript, but unprinted until 1840. I'm told it's in effect a manual of Judaisation of Britain (or perhaps just England) encouraging race mixing, less scholarship for gentlemen, and presumably financial speculation.

1732 Jews' Free School started in London. The name seems to have been retained, more or less: 1817 seems to have been moved to Ebenezer Square, London. Probably this was much larger, and designed to advance Jews in post-Napoleonic Europe, by doing their bit with propaganda and lies. 1822 moved to Bell Lane, London. By 1900, claimed to be 'the largest school in Europe'.

1737 Cruden's Concordance to the Holy Scriptures first published. Alphabetical listing of words (and therefore related phrases) in the King James Version. This must have had its effect on Biblical speculation and 'fundamentalism'.

1753, 1754 Jewish Naturalization Bill was part of the process of Jewish attempted penetration. Wording probably chosen to sound 'natural', and to avoid any suggestion of citizenship or native Britishness. There was a conflict between the House of Lords and House of Commons. It was never made an Act of Parliament.

1764 Currency Act 'the second ... of two laws passed by the British government ... that attempted to take total control of the monetary systems of all 13 colonies of British America. Passed by Parliament on September 1, 1764, the act extended the restrictions of the Currency Act of 1751 to all 13 of the American British colonies. It eased the earlier Currency Act's prohibition against printing of new paper bills, but it did prevent the colonies from repaying future debts with paper bills.' Future taxes to Britain to be paid in gold or silver.

This must have led to pressure for war, and may of course have been planned to that end.

1773 ‘Amschel Mayer Rothschild is born, the first of Mayer Amschel Rothschild's five sons. He, like all his brothers, will enter the family business at the age of twelve.’ Family trees of Rothschilds are uncommon. Starting in parts of Germany before Germany existed, they were famous to Victorians for their branches in Austria, France, Italy, and England. I think this sort of thing was much more common than many people realise. Here's R A Maryks: ‘... a Jesuit told me ... the story of his Jewish lineage. While his other Sephardic ancestors went to Istanbul, Baghdad, Tehran, and–through the Silk Road—up to Shanghai, where they remained Jewish until today, both his grandparents were descendants of Jews who settled in Palermo and Trabia (Sicily), where they converted to Catholicism in order to survive (in the baptismal registers, which are still extant, they are described as "usurers"). ...’

The story is often repeated. BUT note it may be a distraction. The object may be to pretend a new collection of Jews fanned out in Europe at the start of the 19th centry, when of course Jews had been here and there in Europe and elsewhere for many centuries; in fact perhaps a few millennia. And note oligarchy and oligarchies are defined, more or less by default, as involving a 'few' oligarchs. In fact there may be tens of thousands of Jews and collaborators controlling countries, and hoping to pass unnoticed.

1740-1786 Frederick the Great ruled in Prussia (before Germany was unified). As is usual, the Jewish question is not considered by most 'historians'—all the usual restrictions apply, on discussing Jewish interconnections and networking, on weapons procurement and payment, on beliefs and propaganda.

1773 Jesuits ('Society of Jesus') were suppressed by Clement XIV. Cardinal Giovanni Ganganelli was Pope Clement XIV during 1769 to 1774. Jesuits are now believed to have been Marrano Jews. Ganganelli was also involved with investigations into Jewish murders (or 'ritual murders') of children, though he seems not to have investigated Jewish bribery and killings of officials.

1776 Tom Paine's Common Sense published. Interesting partly for its anti-monarchical standpoint, possibly marking a discontinuity between royalty as just another family, albeit special, and royalty as a large, all-encompassing, power grouping.

[ Notes on Unifications of Territories. Revisionist attention to underestimated secret Jewish groups makes it clear that unifications offer special attractions to infiltrating Jews. Some examples:

• France under Charlemagne (before c 1000 AD)

• Unification of Muscovy into Russia, from say 1400 very interesting because of the vast territory—something like half the size of Africa—and the possibilities for infiltration opened by the huge range of tribes/ areas/ cultures.

• 1516 Unification of Spain under Hapsburgs after the Reconquista

• Dutch revolt against Spain; Netherlands and Flanders etc, offering scope for Amsterdam Jews

• 1603 England and Scotland unification, offering scope for Jews in Scotland; 1707 Wales, 1801 Ireland with again Jews opportunities

• 1776 US unification; it's obvious enough now this was heavily influenced by the Jewish 'Bank of England'

• 1870. 'Department of Justice' invented in the USA. Seems to have been Jewish, but pushing policies not widely identified as Jewish. Eustace Mullins said this.

• 1871. Multiple kingdoms both in Germany, and Italy, were respectively unified; 1871 therefore being an important date. Both these events were heavily Jewish-influenced. Note Hitler was brn in about the 18th year of Geran unification; Mussolini in about the twelfth year.]





There are numerous portraits of Washington as a Freemason. Note that Washington was NOT President in 1776, but only in 1789 , coinciding with the (((French Revolution))).

The interval before 1776, then 1776 to 1789 had at least 8 claimants as something like President, of the Continental Congress before the United States, for example: Peyton Randolph, Henry Middleton, Peyton Randolph again, John Hancock, Charles Thomson, Henry Laurens, John Jay, Samuel Huntington.

It seems obvious that Jewish money awaited its puppet. Probably the first of a full series of puppets, most or all 'Jews'. Washington had been Commander-in-Chief of the Continental Army; and very likely was in control of its funding. I haven't seen any deep look into the costs and payments and borrowing of war in what became the USA. The US Dollar was legalised in 1785.

[ Anyone seriously considering the state of the world must re-examine the USA, now old enough for patterns to be drawn despite the confused cobwebs of false ideas designed to baffle. And similarly in Europe: Napoleon Revisited, too long for inclusion here, looks at the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Legends, and incidentally headed off serious investigation into the Middle Ages. napoleon-revisited.html#intellectuals surveys the post-Napoleon intellectual atmosphere in this very sad time, in which important truths were smothered and choked. ]

1776 Adam Smith Wealth of Nations published in chaotic economic conditions. May have been aimed subtly against non-Jewish currencies; laissez-faire obviously appeals to currently-powerful groups, and less obviously hides the Anglo-Jewish control of currencies. At the time, there were open newspaper discussions of currency in north America and its effects on living standards, which were seen to exceed any other variable. I don't know whether this was the first such observation in modern times, making it obvious how important currency control was. And Adam Smith avoided discussion of weapons and militarism and law, despite their obvious importance.

It wouldn't surprise me if 'Adam Smith' was a manufactured propagandist.

1782 Professor Ogilvie published anonymously, An Essay on the Right of Property in Land (120 pages). ['... no right to property in land can justly arise except through occupancy and labour upon it, and even this must be limited by the equal rights of every other individual. And after discussing the various laws and circumstances of modern civilized communities, he shows how the laws can be amended so as to bring about a just distribution of land. This is a thoughtful, well-reasoned, and clearly written work, yet it remained almost unknown to successive generations of reformers.' - A R Wallace ]

1783 Khalifa family start to rule Bahrain 'as a result of the Bani Utub invasion'. Bahrain is an island, the largest of five, about the size of the Isle of Man, small by the standards listing islands in descending size. Many of the people are Shi-ite, but the rulers are Sunni. This must fit in with 18th century Jews, the story being of course kept obscure.

1789 'French Revolution'. Here's an online comment: ... Few present-day Americans realize that France played as great a role in the American Revolution as the Americans themselves—a fact of which King Louis XVI and Benjamin Franklin, were acutely aware. King Louis XVI later remarked upon it, as his government groaned