In Brief The Facts: Professor and Chair of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, Dr. Leroy Hulsey, will be releasing a new study proving that WTC 7 did not fall due to a fire.

Reflect On: With so many people in America calling for a new investigation, and for government to address the evidence that's been brought to light suggesting that 9/11 was a controlled demolition, why is this evidence constantly ignored?

We are fast approaching the 18th year anniversary of 9/11, and that tragic event is still waking up millions and millions of people. The idea that there were pre planted explosives inside of the building is a thought that’s been pondered by many families of victims, scientists, physicists, engineers, and many more. Franklin Square Fire Commissioner Christopher Gioia recently discussed his fire district’s recent passage of a historic resolution supporting a new investigation into events of 9/11.

The latest news on 9/11 investigation progress comes from the University of Alaska Fairbanks, where professor and Chair of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Dr. Leroy Hulsey, will be releasing a new study proving “definitively,” according to Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth founder Richard Gage, that fire did not cause the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7 on 9/11.

--> Help Support CE: Become a member of CETV and get access to exclusive news and courses to help empower you to become an effective changemaker. Also, help us beat censorship! Click here to join.

This study has been in the works for a number of years, and the latest updates showed that, “the findings thus far are that fire did not bring down this building.” (source) Building failure simulations show that, to match observation, the entire inner core of this building failed nearly simultaneously.

Here is a lecture from 2017 of Dr, Hulsey explaining how “WTC 7 did not collapse from fire.”

The study that will be released to the public tomorrow is a draft report. It’s going to be interesting to analyze the information in it.

Dr. Robert Korol, a professor emeritus of civil engineering at McMaster University in Ontario, Canada, alongside Anthony Szamboti, a mechanical design engineer with over 25 years of structural design experience in the aerospace and communications industries and Ted Walter , the director of strategy and development for Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (mentioned above), a nonprofit organization that today represents more than 2,500 architects and engineers published a paper titled “15 Years Later, On The Physics Of High-Rise Building Collapses” in the European Scientific Journal.“ That’s also worth noting.

The fact that Donald Trump also believes that explosives brought down the towers, along with the fact that numerous polls have shown that at least half of all American citizens don’t believe the official explanation given to them by the government should illicit a new investigation.

But as we now know, in America, there are governments within governments that argue and compete against each other.

Political parties exist to secure responsible government and to execute the will of the people. From these great staffs, both of the old parties have ganged aside. Instead of instruments to promote the general welfare they have become the tools of corrupt interests which use them in martialling [sic] to serve their selfish purposes. Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people. To destroy this invisible government, to befoul the unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the first task of the statesmanship of the day. – Theodore Roosevelt (source)

The Implications of Accepting That Explosives Brought The Towers Down

The truth is, there is no Islamic army or terrorist group called Al-Qaeda, and any informed intelligence officer knows this. But, there is a propaganda campaign to make the public believe in the presence of an intensified entity representing the ‘devil’ only in order to drive TV watchers to accept a unified international leadership for a war against terrorism. The country behind this propaganda is the United States. – Robin Cook, Former British Foreign Secretary (source)

It’s called false flag terrorism, it’s something that’s been happening for decades and something we here at CE, and many politicians, journalists and ‘world leaders’ have been calling out for decades. It happens when a powerful group of people create an event, like a supposed terrorist attack for example, and then blame it on a certain group, individual or country in order to justify massive military intervention into a foreign country for ulterior motives unknown to the population. In the case of 9/11, it was used to justify the war in Iraq, which killed millions of innocent civilians and completely destroyed the country.

This type of thing requires a concerted effort within corrupt politics, finance, and the complete control over mainstream media in order to commence the mass brainwashing of society into believing something.

Were the attacks on 9/11 similar to what we’ve seen in Syria with the chemical gas attacks?

The statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince himself the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception. – Mark Twain (source)

As you can see, the implications, if it was a controlled demolition, are huge. It means much of what we were told by our government is and has been a complete lie, and that includes the massive campaign of foreign intervention. It begs the question, who was really responsible for bringing down the towers? And why? If a new investigation is sparked, and new evidence made public, these questions will enter into the heads of millions of people and threaten the interests of some very powerful people.

Current presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard introduced the Stop Arming Terrorists Act (H.R.608), it was a bill to stop the U.S. government from using taxpayer dollars to directly or indirectly support groups who are allied with and supporting terrorist groups like ISIS and al Qaeda. It’s one of many examples of how many are quite aware that the US, or at least factions of the deep state are working with, and have worked these groups by creating and or funding them…..Something to think about.

A Note From Richard Gage

I urgently need your help to raise $50,000 by August 31st to spread the word about this study far and wide. Fortunately, a determined donor has stepped forward with a generous challenge gift of $5,000. That means this donor is challenging the community — including you — to equal his donation by August 31st so that this report can be shared as widely as possible.

Will you donate now to make sure this report is spread far and wide?

When you give today, your gift will be used immediately to launch a multi-channel public awareness campaign about this groundbreaking study. For example, for just $25 you can ensure that ten engineers receive our large-format postcard about the report (plus you’ll receive one, too!), helping us reach 20,000 engineers across the country.

Not only that, but your gift will be used to organize presentations in Fairbanks, Berkeley, and New York, hold a major news conference in Washington D.C. with the Franklin Square fire commissioners, produce a powerful short video for social media, commission a new YouGov survey, and more.

Will you give generously today to make sure we do not miss this incredible opportunity to bring this game-changing study about Building 7’s destruction to the public’s attention?

The Takeaway

The amount of evidence suggesting 9/11 was a controlled demolition is now overwhelming. The fact that it was and still is ridiculed by the mainstream, and the fact that the evidence is not even addressed by the mainstream should raise a red flag.