Huge fields of crops and tracts of forest should be planted across the British countryside to suck carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, according to a new report.

As the nation strives to cut its greenhouse gas pollution by turning its back on fossil fuels, experts have warned this will not be enough to meet the UK’s strict climate targets.

To avoid the worst effects of climate change, countries must actively remove greenhouse gases that have already entered the atmosphere.

Now, in the first plan of its kind for the UK, scientists have laid out an ambitious strategy to do just that involving massive biomass burning plants and carbon stored deep underground.

This strategy was commissioned by the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, but produced independently by the Royal Academy of Engineering and the Royal Society.

Together the approaches have the capacity to make the country carbon neutral by the middle of the century, but the scientists warn there is no time to lose.

“A clear outcome of the report is that we need to act quickly,” said Professor Gideon Henderson of the University of Oxford, who led the team.

10 photographs to show to anyone who doesn't believe in climate change Show all 10 1 /10 10 photographs to show to anyone who doesn't believe in climate change 10 photographs to show to anyone who doesn't believe in climate change A group of emperor penguins face a crack in the sea ice, near McMurdo Station, Antarctica Kira Morris 10 photographs to show to anyone who doesn't believe in climate change Floods destroyed eight bridges and ruined crops such as wheat, maize and peas in the Karimabad valley in northern Pakistan, a mountainous region with many glaciers. In many parts of the world, glaciers have been in retreat, creating dangerously large lakes that can cause devastating flooding when the banks break. Climate change can also increase rainfall in some areas, while bringing drought to others. Hira Ali 10 photographs to show to anyone who doesn't believe in climate change Smoke – filled with the carbon that is driving climate change – drifts across a field in Colombia. Sandra Rondon 10 photographs to show to anyone who doesn't believe in climate change Amid a flood in Islampur, Jamalpur, Bangladesh, a woman on a raft searches for somewhere dry to take shelter. Bangladesh is one of the most vulnerable places in the world to sea level rise, which is expected to make tens of millions of people homeless by 2050. Probal Rashid 10 photographs to show to anyone who doesn't believe in climate change Sindh province in Pakistan has experienced a grim mix of two consequences of climate change. “Because of climate change either we have floods or not enough water to irrigate our crop and feed our animals,” says the photographer. “Picture clearly indicates that the extreme drought makes wide cracks in clay. Crops are very difficult to grow.” Rizwan Dharejo 10 photographs to show to anyone who doesn't believe in climate change Hanna Petursdottir examines a cave inside the Svinafellsjokull glacier in Iceland, which she said had been growing rapidly. Since 2000, the size of glaciers on Iceland has reduced by 12 per cent. Tom Schifanella 10 photographs to show to anyone who doesn't believe in climate change A river once flowed along the depression in the dry earth of this part of Bangladesh, but it has disappeared amid rising temperatures. Abrar Hossain 10 photographs to show to anyone who doesn't believe in climate change A shepherd moves his herd as he looks for green pasture near the village of Sirohi in Rajasthan, northern India. The region has been badly affected by heatwaves and drought, making local people nervous about further predicted increases in temperature. Riddhima Singh Bhati 10 photographs to show to anyone who doesn't believe in climate change A factory in China is shrouded by a haze of air pollution. The World Health Organisation has warned such pollution, much of which is from the fossil fuels that cause climate change, is a “public health emergency”. Leung Ka Wa 10 photographs to show to anyone who doesn't believe in climate change Water levels in reservoirs, like this one in Gers, France, have been getting perilously low in areas across the world affected by drought, forcing authorities to introduce water restrictions. Mahtuf Ikhsan

“There is no silver bullet, but there are a wide suite of technologies and methods that have been suggested for greenhouse gas removal.”

The government has suggested it will aim for “net zero” emissions by 2050, at which point the UK’s greenhouse gases will be cancelled out by the amount that is removed.

However, with sectors such as aviation and agriculture proving difficult to clean up, switching to renewable energy will still leave a huge quantity of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.

“If we go down a path of transforming our energy system, our transport system, the industrial base, how buildings work… We could get to about 130 million tons of CO2 equivalent by 2050,” said Professor Nilay Shah from Imperial College London.

“To get to net zero we need to find methods to take 130 million tons of carbon dioxide actively out of the atmosphere every single year.”

They estimate that using methods already available such as planting trees and restoring natural habitats it should be possible to remove 35 million tons of CO2 by 2050. This includes expanding the UK’s existing forested area by 1.2 million hectares, around the size of Yorkshire.

Beyond that, the UK will need to invest in technologies that are not widely used – chief among which are carbon capture technologies.

The most direct way of doing this is to remove CO2 from the air and store it somewhere it cannot do any harm, such as underground in geological formations.

Nicola Sturgeon mocks Donald Trump over climate change ahead of UK visit

A more roundabout method involves growing bioenergy crops which can then be burned to produce energy, with the CO2 released as they burn being captured and stored. For this technique to be applied on a significant scale, vast areas of land would have to be transformed to grow the appropriate bioenergy plants.

Such substantial changes to the British landscape could be a source of controversy, according to report contributor Professor Corinne Le Quere of the University of East Anglia.

“People will respond to these technologies in different ways, and opposition could limit deployment,” she said, noting that it would be vital to engage local communities and communicate the costs and benefits effectively.

While the UK has a £9m research programme investigating some of these techniques, Professor Henderson said this was “insufficient” if the kind of revolution outlined in their report is to be implemented.

The team also noted “early signs of activity” including tree planting targets and coal plants being converted to biomass facilities, but said there is a need for more government intervention.

Such action could include a post-Brexit subsidy system to encourage farmers to use their land to store carbon.

These suggestions were broadly welcomed by other researchers, who praised the ambition of the plan.

“The report is bold in calling for field-scale experimentation of untested technologies, and deployment of others. However, it needs to be bold,” said Dr Phil Renforth of Cardiff University, who was not involved in the work.