Some conservatives have grudgingly agreed with incoming socialist New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez that the $2.5 billion sweetheart tax break that New York gave to Amazon to locate in Queens was a lousy deal for taxpayers.

“How does that work?” an incredulous Fox News host Tucker Carlson asked on his most recent show.

“Jeff Bezos, who is the world’s richest man, will receive more than $2 billion in subsidies from you, the taxpayer,” he said.

“New Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez had this to say: ‘Amazon is a billion-dollar company. The idea it will receive hundreds of millions of dollars in tax rates at a time when a subway is crumbling in our communities need more investment, not less, is extremely concerning to residents here,’” Carlson continued.

“I hate to admit it, but Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has a very good point. It’s hard to argue with the internal logic, the richest man in the world just got $2 billion in taxpayer subsidies. How does that work?” the conservative firebrand added, referring to Amazon chief Jeff Bezos, who has a net worth that tops $150 billion, making him the richest man in America.

Veronique de Rugy, a senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, also rebuked the massive tax breaks in a piece in the National Review and criticized fellow conservatives, some of whom mocked the 29-year-old Ocasio-Cortez for opposing the deal.

“I can’t believe I’m saying this, but Ocasio-Cortez is mostly correct on this matter, and her conservative critics are wrong. Handouts like this to Amazon and other prominent companies are appalling in their cronyism, pure and simple,” she wrote.

“I agree that she doesn’t understand economics and that her socialist ideal is a recipe for fiscal and economic disaster. But her conservative critics reveal their own economic misunderstanding when they support targeted tax breaks as a means of creating jobs.”

She argued that Amazon was seeking locations with skilled workforces and quality educational options — and that tax breaks were largely an afterthought to those factors.

“In other words, Amazon would have likely made the same decision with or without subsidies. It also explains why no amount of subsidies can drag a company to a place that isn’t economically vibrant or that is in the middle of nowhere,” de Rugy wrote.

“But face it: Amazon was never going to move to, say, Opelika, Ala., or Marfa, Texas, no matter how gargantuan the promised tax breaks there.”

Bre Payton, a writer for the conservative website The Federalist, also slammed the deal.

“The democratic socialist from the Bronx is right to be outraged about the corporate welfare that threatens to price her constituents out of their own housing market,” she wrote Wednesday.

Amazon announced Monday it had chosen Long Island City, Queens — where protesters gathered Wednesday to denounce the deal — and Arlington, Va., as the sites for a new split headquarters.

Ocasio-Cortez had said on Twitter that the people she represents have expressed “outrage” over the tax breaks, while arguing that the city’s subway “is crumbling” and the cash could also go for student loan forgiveness.

“Amazon is a billion-dollar company. The idea that it will receive hundreds of millions of dollars in tax breaks at a time when our subway is crumbling and our communities need MORE investment, not less, is extremely concerning to residents here,” she tweeted.

Gov. Andrew Cuomo and Mayor Bill de Blasio both defended the subsidies — $1.28 billion from the city and as much as $1.71 billion from the state — arguing that the Amazon facility would create tens of thousands of jobs.

The company said it would invest billions in the new facilities, and that the benefits would far surpass the cost of the subsidies, which will pay for items including a helipad.

In addition to Ocasio-Cortez, state Sen. Mike Gianaris and City Councilman Jimmy Van Bramer — Democrats who represent Long Island City — spoke out against the deal.

“Offering massive corporate welfare from scarce public resources to one of the wealthiest corporations in the world at a time of great need in our state is just wrong,” Gianaris and Van Bramer said in a joint statement. They added that they “were not elected to serve as Amazon drones.”