or know to be reliable....



So, for example, through my research I know that at least 2 Grand Juries have been convened and that they are both RICO & identified as having Diversity Jurisdiction ...

but only one is focused on RICO issues tied to violations of Foreign Agents Act





Multiple sources over time have indicated that audio of Ryan & McConnell exists.. re: discussion of knowing about GOP campaign funds being washed fluffed & folded



I also know that there have been two distinct arenas of investigational focus:

criminal and impeachable



This is simply the equivalent of investigational multi tasking....

Some "evidence" goes in one pile or the other

And some goes in both piles....





The post says ...

'separate from acts...for which Pence & Trump MAY be charged'

When referencing the potential oath of office violations (regarding separation of powers) associated with the firing of Comey given the ongoing investigations and underlying motivations behind the firing ....



So, when I evaluated the information, I found that

1. It was consistent with other information



2. It clearly indicates the potential for charges.. without asserting that charges are certain...



3. I recognize that The Source is passing along information as she received it...

and offering additional details to provide the context necessary to make sense of the new information.



4. She obviously has a source or two that have access to their country's IC data...

and she has consistently been ahead of domestic reports ....

Which makes sense given the fact that our own IC is relying heavily on foreign intell resources



Overall... it is quite likely that, given all of the other issues in play,

pence & trump screwed themselves royally

by firing Comey then lying about motives then revealing true motives.... as it is the true motives which are problematic....



But we each must engage in such informational analysis for ourselves rather than rely on the opinions of others......

