AutoCAD and AutoDesk Inventor are two different programs that may be used with different computer-aided design functions in mind. It’s best for people to get a closer look at these two programs and to compare them with each other to get an idea of how they work. As it will be seen here, AutoCAD is perfect for design-related projects while Inventor can help with generating virtual tests.

AutoCAD

AutoCAD is a program for architectural and engineering professionals that works to review the many different drawings that may be used within a project. In particular, a user can load up a diagram or other drawing and edit it in real time while sharing it with other people.

This is available for 2D drafting and 3D modeling needs alike. It allows users to edit individual objects within any illustration or other special program. All objects can be sketched and altered through a series of technical controls that makes it easy for people to adjust the items that they are reviewing in real time.

In addition, people can review items within AutoCAD from any angle that they want. This means that the design process can be fully three-dimensional. There is no need for anyone to worry about having to switch from one document or file to another as everything devoted to one particular product or design feature will be highlighted within just one open file.

Design by CBS

AutoDesk Inventor

AutoDesk Inventor is designed for those who are looking to create 3D digital prototypes of different objects. Inventor also helps with the overall simulation process of illustrating how individual products and prototypes can work.

One of the most popular features of Inventor is that it operates with its own motion simulation feature. Information on the driving features and friction components within an item can be uploaded while the user can also test a product on Inventor to review how well individual items work.

This program uses many specific file formats for individual parts and assemblies. It also uses an extensive geometry-based engine designed to ensure that all readouts and analysis reports are generated in real time and will not be harder to use or review than necessary. When used right, it can create a better design that is very easy for all to use and control no matter what is going to be edited.

Design by Bolek Lolek

AutoCAD vs. Inventor

AutoCAD and Inventor are both different primarily in that AutoCAD works with the purpose of designing and creating new items while Inventor is for those who want to actually test something in motion. For instance, AutoCAD can be used to design a robotic machine while Inventor can help simulate how that machine would actually move while in use. Each program has its own design features dedicated to creating the most realistic depictions of how individual products are to be used.

AutoCAD is often used more than Inventor as it is designed to ensure that the right materials are to be created before any tests are to be used. AutoCAD especially helps people to review diagrams and drawings of prototypes and makes it very easy for people to share information in real time.

Inventor may not be used too often when compared with AutoCAD but it can be perfect for when the user has to work with very specific technical aspects of a program or device. It can show details on how individual parts of a prototype may interact with each other and function over time.

Final Thought

Overall, AutoCAD and Inventor are two programs that are very different from one another in terms of what they can do. However, if they are paired together then it can be very easy for any business to do more with regards to designing different items for sale or for use in a workplace.

AutoCAD will help with the process of designing an item and seeing how it works. Inventor will create a virtual test of a product as it is in its development and design stages. When used properly, anyone could have a very easy time with handling the processes associated with creating different items. All businesses that have a need to design new products or procedures should consider what they can get out of these two individual products and how they may be used as required.