Photo credit: PCGamesn.com

How surprising, the ultra-liberal SJW YouTube personality Stephen Bonnell, better known as "Destiny" is apparently under investigation by the FBI for possession of child pornography. I'm being sarcastic of course seeing as Destiny has been open about the fact that he advocates for legalizing incest and "ethical child porn." Wait, what? Ok. let's rewind a bit first.

Destiny, the self-same self-righteous "voice of Social Justice" who has attacked and doxed other YouTubers for veering away from the Cultural Marxist path released nudes of an ex-girlfriend in 2012. To retaliate, she, in turn, hacked his Gmail account releasing nude photos of him as well as leaked group chat logs in which Bonnell admits to having taken pictures from a 15-year-old girl who wanted to "hook up" and how it was "so hard" to turn her down. In the group chat, his friends seem to sympathize with him as they minimize the act of child exploitation:

<quote>"who tf cares it's not like you're 40 years old"</quote>

Well, evidently (and thankfully) the FBI tf cares. Another member of the group chat (who may also be worth at least adding as a person of interest in Destiny's case) but that he shouldn't go any further than photographing her as young people "are usually so inexperienced." And yes, <a href="https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=641_1512179884">the issue of "ethical child porn"</a> evidently the tangible documents of child exploitation and child molestation should be available because of the "moral and pragmatic value" in that it will stop pedophiles from abusing children.

<a href="https://archive.is/ssxNx">In the leaked chat logs</a>, Destiny's friends discuss the pros and cons of having sex with "hot" underage girls. At one point, one of Destiny's inner circle asks for the pictures of the underage girl and Bonnell willingly obliges.

1:18:44 PM] Josue "Fayth" Sauvageau: pics plz

[1:18:50 PM] Payam Toghyan: fayth likes the preteens

[1:18:50 PM] Josue "Fayth" Sauvageau: but what happened then

[1:18:51 PM] * Steven Bonnell II sent 0235.jpg TIYLP .jpg *

At least it seems like he knows what he was getting into:

[1:18:53 PM] Steven Bonnell II: girl on the left

[1:19:07 PM] Steven Bonnell II: so hard to say no

[1:19:11 PM] Steven Bonnell II: gonna get arrested one of these MLGs man

[1:19:18 PM] Josue "Fayth" Sauvageau: wow lolol

[1:19:24 PM] Josue "Fayth" Sauvageau: funny how girls

[1:19:26 PM] Payam Toghyan: wtf who cares its not like ur 40 years old

[1:19:27 PM] Josue "Fayth" Sauvageau: responds to fame

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Destiny, known distributor of child pornography, known predator and incestuous threat to all ages, is now walking back his claim that he ever received nudes from underage girls despite the prior admissions and evidence.</p>— JD huWhite (@TheKeksplainer) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheKeksplainer/status/947242848864342018?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 30, 2017</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">One of "Dick Pic" <a href="https://twitter.com/OmniDestiny?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@OmniDestiny</a> goons mentioned: "I am on the side of destiny on the cp argument, consuming child pornography is not a violation of the NAP and if it helps the to reduce children being raped, it's a good thing." <a href="https://twitter.com/JFGariepy?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@JFGariepy</a> plz respond <a href="https://t.co/dhb6hOhfbA">https://t.co/dhb6hOhfbA</a>"</p>— Narses Kalchas (@NarsesKalchas) <a href="https://twitter.com/NarsesKalchas/status/947208903728779269?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 30, 2017</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Destiny & co (I know, I know you're thinking "what, THIS standup crew?) were also <a href="http://archive.is/hREJU">apparently grooming a preteen</a> through IRC chat just a few months ago. Evidently (surely not, you're screaming at this point as you've left the edge of your seat and are standing and jumping up and down on it like Tom Cruise on the Oprah show announcing his imminent "marriage" to Katie Holmes) this is <a href="http://archive.is/fa05z">nothing near an isolated incident</a> from the Social Justice loving crew of Destiny groupies as witnessed at the official Destiny subreddit.

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/HMgsQSwkqO4" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Are you talking about this video? <a href="https://t.co/5SCrxIx8CE">https://t.co/5SCrxIx8CE</a><br>How in the fuck was this an ambush? <a href="https://twitter.com/BrittanyVenti?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@BrittanyVenti</a> was taunting him the entire time about the topic and when he challengedher shelost hershit. She had2other people agreeing with her, then <a href="https://twitter.com/Asmongold?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Asmongold</a> tried reasoning to her</p>— Vex (@Vexed_Reprobate) <a href="https://twitter.com/Vexed_Reprobate/status/947317861495787521?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 31, 2017</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The guy who argued "if birth control is used what's really wrong with incest?" and besides "it takes several generations of incest" before there is any risk of serious birth defects. Oh, don't forget being opposed to incest due to the risk of birth defects makes you "pro-eugenics." This is the same guy who argued for bestiality because "if the animal isn't hurt, what's wrong with it?" This is the same guy who takes offense to Lauren Southern's issues on immigration. We don't have to go deeply into the issue of moral relativism, but I'm sure most sane persons, even those who are pro-open borders might agree that incest, animal and child abuse are probably not as big an issue as to whether or not we open the floodgates as far as immigration goes.

Of course, even with all this, there are plenty of his hardcore fans (many of whom are likely hardcore incest, child and bestiality porn fans) who are going to bat for him.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">"Under investigation" = "guilty" now<br>I guess its strange how you feel this way about someone you don't like, Destiny… But when its Trump under investigation, he is surely innocent </p>— LTBALOL (@LTBALOL) <a href="https://twitter.com/LTBALOL/status/977154566893527041?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 23, 2018</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

But this fanboyish protective behavior has been going on for a while:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">And even if these two things are true. The amount of ways that these people lie and misrepresent Destiny on a daily basis is insane. They lie about him being a pedophile and whole cloth supporting child pornography when these things are not true in the slightest.</p>— zemiron (@zemiron) <a href="https://twitter.com/zemiron/status/957238648600190976?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 27, 2018</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Wait, did you watch the video above where he literally argues in favor of the "moral and pragmatic" foundation for supporting "ethical child pornography?" No one is putting words in his mouth, no one even had to hand him the rope needed to hang himself. And here's the thing, the incest and child porn advocacy aren't one-off things, no evidently they're as common as… well, Destiny groupies grooming underage girls.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/JFGariepy?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@JFGariepy</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/BravingRuin?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@BravingRuin</a> Destiny and his little gang were involved in grooming a 12 year old in their twitch chat <a href="https://t.co/eV1SrhZn8E">pic.twitter.com/eV1SrhZn8E</a></p>— Alexei (@MSalutant) <a href="https://twitter.com/MSalutant/status/947171299025211392?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 30, 2017</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

By the way, that argument that Destiny makes in favor of child pornography involving real children being used as a "deterrent" to more child exploitation, molestation and rape? Yeah, the authors themselves are very clear when they say, "We do not approve of the use of real children in the production and distribution of child pornography."

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I read the paper Destiny likes citing to support his argument for “ethical child porn” involving real kids to lower related sex crimes.<br><br>It’s just statistical correlations between the # of sex crime reports and the availability of porn. <br><br>Here’s what the authors themselves say. <a href="https://t.co/siaPsMo2QT">pic.twitter.com/siaPsMo2QT</a></p>— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) <a href="https://twitter.com/stillgray/status/954545170673893376?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 20, 2018</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The Destiny groupies aren't all naifs though. Some, as we've seen, seems to fully support the idea of making incest and child exploitation mainstream. There's this Twitter user who is constantly fighting for Destiny's honor and advocating for socialism when he's not pointing out that the only argument you can come up with against child pornography is a moral one, which… uhhh, isn't that enough?

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">why? The only real argument against child pornography is a moral one, which is what Destiny was espousing throughout the debate.</p>— Vex (@Vexed_Reprobate) <a href="https://twitter.com/Vexed_Reprobate/status/936986187344023553?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 2, 2017</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Here's another who equates the protracted baiting and grooming of a preteen girl with a veritable civil rights struggle:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Oh no! Not a conversation!!!<br>What's next? Are we going to be conversing with gays? Blacks? OH THE HUMANITY!!! </p>— Rocky Avalon (@RockyAvalon) <a href="https://twitter.com/RockyAvalon/status/947210826246770689?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 30, 2017</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Sadly, this isn't surprising considering NAMBLA and other pedophilia advocates try and argue that the "right" to molest children is actually important in order to "liberate" children from the oppressive morality of their parents and the "outdated morality" we're all saddled with due to generations of those horrible "dead, white guys" and their vicious, repressive patriarchy. Seriously though, if patriarchy is the side that supports not distributing the evidence of the rape of a child, I guess I'm all for it.

It's pretty bad when doxing, false DMCA claims and revenge porn are the least offensive charges.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Omnidestiny issues a copyright takedown of a twitter video stream clip <a href="https://twitter.com/BrittanyVenti?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@BrittanyVenti</a> posted. <a href="https://t.co/qohF6HDyyD">pic.twitter.com/qohF6HDyyD</a></p>— Nick Monroe (@nickmon1112) <a href="https://twitter.com/nickmon1112/status/936779515543425025?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 2, 2017</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<iframe width="1280" height="720" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/pEKP2c2-ZA0" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>

He's even admitted he was "so close" to planning the murder of a guy he disagreed with (and his family) having had streets mapped out, getting a permit to own a gun and even talked to friends who were willing to help him. And get this, the only thing that stopped him? The fact that he was "making so much money on Twitch." Wow, real class act there Mr. Bonnell. Way to go, you champion for what is right, you posterboy for "social justice."

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="und" dir="ltr"> <a href="https://t.co/aPG9eWbjKr">pic.twitter.com/aPG9eWbjKr</a></p>— Laudanum (@FaustianBurgle) <a href="https://twitter.com/FaustianBurgle/status/947218434298925056?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 30, 2017</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Honestly, it's probably all for the best and hopefully when the case is brought forth his child (yes, the man argues in favor of incest and believes taking pictures of underage kids and fapping to child porn can be totally morally justified has a child himself) will find a safe home. We'll be following this one as it develops, who knows, maybe it will culminate in Stephen "ethical child porn" Bonnell learning the value of rehabilitation in the form "moral and pragmatic prison rape."

[UPDATE]

We are in contact with Stephen Bonnell who has taken offense at this article which he considers "slanderous." According to Bonnell:

<blockquote>some of the information in there is just wrong (I've never "leaked nudes" of anyone and I don't "dox YouTubers") and a ton of it is horrendously spun half-truths, ie: the video posted about incest/beastiality was literally a devil's advocate argument against another guy who rang in to debate something, etc etc etc</blockquote>

We will be setting up a time to speak with Mr. Bonnell and get the story set straight from the horse's mouth. Here at The Goldwater, we always aim to offer nothing but factual and accurate information, even in our Op-Eds section. Speaking of Op-Eds, all Opinions are solely the opinions of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Goldwater or the whole of its staff. That's one thing that is great about The Goldwater, we have a very diverse group of writers many of whom have strong opinions but we certainly never aim to be either misleading nor an echo chamber.

-Ed.