For the love of God, would a real reporter please just ask Hillary under what possible scenario she gets more delegates, more states, or more votes than Obama? You all keep playing this game of following her around like she’s news. The only reason she’s news is that she’s an election zombie, roaming the primaries like she’s still viable, when she’s not. And you know it. And you’ve written it. But you don’t ask her about it. Far more important than even Hillary’s bizarre and ever-changing views on nuclear weapons policy is the fact that it doesn’t matter any more what Hillary thinks about anything. She lost the nomination. She can’t win. And short of an asteroid falling on Obama’s head, he’s going to get the nomination. We’re all focused like a laser beam on the Pennsylvania results as if they matter. They don’t. She lost. She can’t catch up. We all know it. So why are we still playing this game? Because it would be mean to tell her the truth? Mean to ask her to explain how she possibly wins enough delegates, or even votes, when the math says she can’t? What is she, 12? George Stephanopoulos said he couldn’t think of a harder question to ask Hillary than as to why people don’t trust her. Well, here’s one, George: “Under what possible scenario could you catch up to Obama in either delegates or votes?” And don’t accept her platitudes about “counting every vote.” She can’t mathematically overtake Obama, so what is she doing, other than wasting all of our time (and destroying her family’s reputation)? (That’s another “hard” question, George.)