Posted on by lskenazy

Hi Readers: Two words — Jerry Sandusky — will be invoked for the next umpteen years to justify background checking every male who interacts with children. Let’s remind those folks that if anyone HAD background checked Jerry Sandusky he’d have looked as trustworthy as a golden retriever. – L.

Dear Free-Range Kids: My hubby who has been coaching our boys hockey for 16 years just received a letter from our police to come in and submit fingerprints in order for him to continue coaching. The new policy requires this. Fingerprinting!! Never mind that we already have ‘safeguards’ in place. Each team has at least 3 coaches and there must always be 2 coaches present with the players at all times if parents aren’t there. Now they have to submit to not only a background check but be fingerprinted in order to ascertain that you haven’t changed your name after a conviction. What can you do? If you want to keep involved in your child’s sport you don’t have a choice.

Sad that volunteers are under constant suspicion and offensive to have to be treated this way. — Nathalie Delage

If you are male, you’re guilty till fingerprinted innocent.

Share this: Share

Facebook

Reddit



Like this: Like Loading... Related

Filed under: Bad Laws, Rules and Verdicts, Eek! A Male! (and Stranger Danger), Insurance repercussions, Other Places Other Eras, Sex Offender Issues, Uncategorized | Tagged: child abuse, coach predator, crimes against children, Jerry Sandusky, kidnap, male near children. crime of being male, men are bad, men as predators, molest, suspected child abuse, suspicion |