The Countryside and Rights of Way (CRoW) Act 2000 (i) was intended to deliver much-needed public access to the countryside. Before CRoW was enacted, however, it had already been stripped of many of its intended public benefits. For example, it sought to exclude the public from inland water. CRoW was complicated, expensive, and fails to deliver the access to land and water needed by the wider public. The CRoW mapping exercise alone cost nearly £8m, to address the needs of the small percentage of the public who want to access upland areas. Welsh Government took ownership of this issue in 2009 (ii), yet at the end of 2015, recreational access to land fails to meet the needs of the wider public, and the issue of access to water has not progressed. To the contrary, costly initiatives endorsed and supported by Welsh Government have led in some cases to reduced access to inland water. Two successive Welsh Governments have acknowledged the need for change, but instead chose a process which serves only to maintain the status quo. Welsh Government’s 3-year process costing at least £2.4m has, by their own admission , not delivered. Rather, it has demonstrably reduced access opportunities, for example to inland water. Scotland implemented a permanent solution through land reform legislation (iv) for the legislative cost of £200,000, with a final cost of approx. £3m including the cost of television campaigning and public education (v).

(i) Countryside and Rights of Way Act(2000) http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/37/contents/enacted

(ii) Report of the Petitions Committee’s Short Inquiry into Access along Inland Water, March 2009 (iii) https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/62377602/Welsh\_Government\_Letter\_RefTOJG0126513\_16Oct2013.pdf (iv) Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2003/2/contents/enacted

(v) LAND REFORM (SCOTLAND) BILL-EXPLANATORY NOTES (AND OTHER ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENTS) http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/S1\_Bills/Land%20Reform%20%28Scotland%29%20Bill/b44s