The U.K. Government-funded Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has claimed in a new report that blacks are “three times as likely than white people to be murdered”—but failed to point out that it is blacks who are doing the murdering.

The latest anti-white outburst from the EHRC—headed up by the Jew David Isaacs— has been widely quoted in the controlled media as “evidence” of “white racism.”

The new EHRC report, titled “Healing a divided Britain: the need for a comprehensive race equality strategy,” was issued last week in London.

Its contents have been widely reported through the controlled media, all of which repeated the comments made by Isaacs—that body’s chairman—in his introduction that “if you are Black in England you are more than three times more likely to be a victim of murder and four times more likely to be stopped and searched by the police.”

The Independent, for example, ran with this claim as their major article on the new report, with the implication that blacks are somehow being gunned down by whites—a tactic identical to the one used in America to falsely claim that white police are randomly shooting black men at will.

The purpose of these deliberate lies is to incite nonwhites into open violence against white people, as has already happened in the United States.

In fact, as all the statistics show, it is blacks in Britain who commit the majority of violent street crime, including murders among their own community.

In June 2007, for example, the BBC admitted that the “black community [is] in a crime ‘crisis.’”

Quoting a Commons home affairs committee, the BBC said that “young black people were more involved in certain types of crime, including robbery, drug and gun offences. They were also more likely to be the victims of violent crime.”

The Committee report added that this was a “serious crisis” for “sections of black communities and for some young people of a mixed ethnic background.”

The report also revealed that three-quarters of all young black males in Britain are “on the national DNA database.” A person only gets added to the DNA database when they have been arrested for an imprisonable offence.

In June 2010, the Sunday Telegraph obtained statistics on accusations of crime broken down by race from the Metropolitan Police Service in London.

The figures showed that the majority of males who were accused of violent crimes in the 2009–2010 year were black.

The data provided a breakdown of the ethnicity of the 18,091 men and boys who police took action against for a range of violent and sexual offences in London in 2009–10, the Telegraph reported.

“They show that among those proceeded against for street crimes, 54 percent were black; for robbery, 59 percent; and for gun crimes, 67 percent. Street crimes include muggings, assault with intent to rob, and snatching property.”

The police figures also show that black men are twice as likely to be victims. They made up 29 percent of the male victims of gun crime and 24 percent of the male victims of knife crime.

The statistics also showed that black women are responsible for a disproportionate amount of violent crime committed by females.

The Telegraph went on to quote a prominent local black politician named Shaun Bailey—a Conservative party election candidate—who said that the “black community has to look at itself and say that, at the end of the day, these figures suggest we are heavily—not casually—involved in violent crime. We are also involved in crime against ourselves—and we regularly attack each other.”

The Daily Mail report of the same figures stated emphatically, “Black men ‘to blame for most violent city crime’… but they’re also the victims.”

The statistics showed that black men are twice as likely to be victims of violent crimes committed by other blacks, the paper reported.

In addition, police “hold black men responsible for more than two-thirds of shootings and more than half of robberies and street crimes in London, according to figures released by Scotland Yard” and “67 percent of those caught by police for gun crimes were black.”

The link between blacks and violent crime is so obvious that even former U.K. Prime Minister Tony Blair was forced to comment publicly on the matter.

In April 2007, Blair said that Black communities “must speak out against the gang culture that leads to gun and knife crime killing black kids. But we won’t stop this by pretending it isn’t young black kids doing it.”

Blair added that “the spate of knife and gun murders in London was not being caused by poverty, but a distinctive black culture.”

The police are under no illusions as to who is responsible for gun crime in London, and as long as ago as 1988, set up a special unit called “Operation Trident” to combat the black gun crime murder plague.

According to the Metropolitan Police’s own website, “Operation Trident” is “focused primarily on gun crime and homicide within the black community.”

It is thus deceitful and dishonest in the extreme for the EHRC to imply, as it does, in its latest report that whites are responsible for the high black murder rate.

The EHRC report then goes on to list all the things that are wrong with the Third World colonizer community in Britain, each and every time blaming white “racism” for the social and economic disaster in which the nonwhites find themselves.

For example, the EHRC report reveals that:

Permanent school exclusion for Black Caribbean and Mixed White/Black Caribbean children in England is around three times the exclusion rate for all pupils. (“Exclusion” means that the behavior of the child is so reprehensible and violent that they are expelled from attending school.)

Over the last five years, the number of young nonwhites in the UK who are “long-term unemployed has almost doubled, whereas for young white people it fell slightly.”

Nonwhites are “twice as likely to live in poverty compared to white people across Britain.”

In 2014, the probability of black African women being detained under mental health legislation in England was more than seven times higher than for white British women.

Rates of prosecution and sentencing for black people in England and Wales are three times higher than for white people.

Nonwhites in police custody in England and Wales are significantly more likely to be physically restrained than white people.

Substantial gaps in attainment remain between nonwhite and white pupils across England and Wales.

There was a considerable gap in the percentage of white and nonwhite people starting apprenticeships (89 percent compared with 2–5 percent).

The rate of incarceration in jails for nonwhites is over five times that of white people.

None of these facts are the fault of white people, no matter what the EHRC and the controlled media might say.

The real cause of these social and economic disparities lies in the reality of racial differences—and that Third World populations cannot be expected to compete effectively in a First World-dominated environment.

Until this simple truth is accepted—and acted upon—Third Worlders will permanently be at a “disadvantage”—at least until there are no white people left, when there will be no “advantaged class” with which they can be compared.

The EHRC report does, therefore, ironically demonstrate once again that the only genuine solution to the racial question facing Britain—and the entire Western world—is total physical racial geographical separation.

Only when each race has its own living area, where it can develop fully to the best of its ability without having to compete with others, can the real cause of racial conflict be avoided.