exclusively to the twin towers

edit on 7-1-2014 by NewAgeMan because: (no reason given)



I really wish that NIST could be forced to answer why and precisely how, the twin towers managed to be destroyed the way they were to within 4-6 seconds of absolute free fall for any freely dropped object from the same height in nothing but air, or in other words, just wtf actually happened beyond the hypothetical point of collapse initiation, if such a thing were even possible to begin with (which couldbe refuted).Someone in another thread claimed that NIST did in fact provide a model of the twin towers' actual destruction, post "collapse" initiation. Is this true, and if so, where can we find it?Given the extreme height of the towers and the time of theirfree fall destruction, which lends itself very well to a comprehensive rebuttal to the O.S., why can't A&E4911T, given their now rather impressive membership listing of 2000+, which is the size of a fairly significant, multidisciplinary architectural and engineering consulting firm, in and of itself, along with some physicists who understand the laws of motion and conservation of momentum - not generate a comprehensive rebuttal to the NIST Report, as it relates specifically to the North and South Tower, of the WTC, where the crux of the global psy-op that is 9/11 took place?Such a comprehensive rebuttal could then be published in a high profile building engineering and or engineering science publication, who, now that 12 years have passed, might be actually willing to give it an honest peer review, and then actually publish it. It would then force a rebuttal, in turn, according to the laws of physics and structural engineering, which is something that I'd like to see someone be forced to TRY to make... can you imagine how the heck they could possibly manage THAT?! They'd need a new type of physics..I get why WTC 7 is important, but not to the exclusion of looking at the way that the north and south tower "collapsed".Why does the 9/11 truth movement seem to be absolutely obsessed with Building 7, but seems unconcerned with the physical problems (according to the OS) with the destruction of the twin towers themselves?If I had the money, i'd have no problem dropping a million dollars or more, for a comprehensive rebuttal to the NIST report, as it relatesI just don't get it, why such a comprehensive rebuttal to the NIST report, regarding the twin towers' total destruction in 14-16 seconds, each, has not been undertaken by this organization, and it's my understanding that they have the money now or could easily raise it.Just a thought... pass it on _BoneZ_ if you could, thanks.NAMEdit to add:Is it maybe because of thecausal link or connection to the plane impacts?If so, then i would suggest a collaborative effort with Pilots for 9/11 Truth, whereby their data and analysis, showcased herecould form a supplemental report, revealing that the apparent causal connection to the plane impacts is entirely fraudulent and a blatant HOAX of Hitlerian and Orwellian proportions, and then some.I guess I'll email Gage myself (forgive me if I don't entirely trust the ATS mods/staff around here, although that said, i do really like your work here _BoneZ_).