RESEARCH is pointing to conscientiousness as the one-trait-to-rule-them-all in terms of future success, both career-wise and personal.

"It would actually be nice if there were some negative things that went along with conscientiousness," Roberts told me. "But at this point it’s emerging as one of the primary dimensions of successful functioning across the lifespan. It really goes cradle to grave in terms of how people do."



What is it? Basically, it's being "efficient, organised, neat, and systematic":



Conscientiousness is the state of being thorough, careful or vigilant; it implies a desire to do a task well.



Conscientiousness is also one trait of the five-factor model of personality, and is manifested in characteristic behaviours such as being efficient, organised, neat and systematic. It includes such elements as self-discipline, carefulness, thoroughness, self-organisation, deliberation (the tendency to think carefully before acting) and need for achievement.



Yeah, that sounds like a trait we all respect. What's amazing is just how predictive it is of so many things we all desire. It’s pretty crazy, really. Here are a few via How Children Succeed: Grit, Curiosity and the Hidden Power of Character:



Money and job satisfaction? - Check.



"Measured concurrently, emotionally stable and conscientious participants reported higher incomes and job satisfaction."



Finding a job? - Check.



"…the personality traits conscientiousness and neuroticism have a strong impact on the instantaneous probability of finding a job, where the former has a positive effect and the latter has a negative effect."



Long marriage? - Check.



"…our findings suggest that conscientiousness is the trait most broadly associated with marital satisfaction in this sample of long-wed couples."



Healthier life? - Check.



"Among adults over age 45 (n = 2,419), neuroticism and low agreeableness were associated with metabolic syndrome, whereas high conscientiousness was protective. Individuals who scored in the top 10 per cent on Conscientiousness were approximately 40 per cent less likely to have metabolic syndrome…"



Long life? - Check.



"Conscientiousness, which was the best predictor of longevity when measured in childhood, also turned out to be the best personality predictor of long life when measured in adulthood."



And let's not forget good grades and staying out of jail.



"…conscientiousness was the trait that best predicted workplace success. What intrigues Roberts about conscientiousness is that it predicts so many outcomes that go far beyond the workplace. People high in conscientiousness get better grades in school and college; they commit fewer crimes; and they stay married longer. They live longer - and not just because they smoke and drink less. They have fewer strokes, lower blood pressure and a lower incidence of Alzheimer's disease."



Can life really be that simple? Isn't there something conscientiousness doesn't predict that we all respect and desire? Yes.



Creativity and independence.



So the question is, to what degree is conscientiousness universally good - and to what degree is our society merely structured to reward it?



Our schools love to pay creativity lip service, but those aren’t the students that get celebrated.



Teachers rewarded repressed drones, according to Bowles and Gintis; they found that the students with the highest Grad Point Averages were the ones who scored lowest on measures of creativity and independence, and the highest on measures of punctuality, delay of gratification, predictability and dependability.



Teachers often say they love creative students. They don’t.



Judgments for the favourite student were negatively correlated with creativity; judgments for the least favorite student were positively correlated with creativity. Students displaying creative characteristics appear to be unappealing to teachers.



The workplace isn’t any different.



Bowles and Gintis then consulted similar scales for office workers, and they found that supervisors judged their workforce the way teachers judged their students. They gave low ratings to employees with high levels of creativity and independence and high ratings to those workers with high levels of tact, punctuality, dependability and delay of gratification.



Are you a creative person? Want to be a CEO? Good luck. You’ll need it.



In sum, we show that the negative association between expressing creative ideas and leadership potential is robust and underscores an important but previously unidentified bias against selecting effective leaders.



I have no doubt that conscientiousness is a valuable trait pretty much anywhere. To be blunt, having your sh*t together is a respectable quality. But we should all be concerned that our system may be too extreme in rewarding conscientiousness and punishing creativity.



This article was originally published on Eric Barker's blog, Barking Up The Wrong Tree.





NOW READ about the bloggers who turned into multi-millionaires