During a debate about how important it was to listen to the views of average Trump voters on CNN’s Reliable Sources Sunday, political commentator Jeff Greenfield noted that the outlet hyped the Russia investigation to the point where it seemed as though the President would be indicted at any second. This, as political commentator Neera Tanden of the Center for American Progress and former Hillary Clinton policy director, claimed that the media didn’t listen to the anti-Trump resistance enough.

Towards the end of their discussion, Greenfield was commenting on how many people listen to certain media outlets because it catered to what they wanted to hear. “And I was told it's like sinking into a nice warm bath. And I think on both sides of the divide, people are sinking into nice warm baths to reconfirm what they believe,” he explained.

He then suggested that CNN was one of those kinds of places where the anti-Trump could find some solace:

The idea that when I watch CNN sometimes, I think, I expect the indictment on Donald Trump to be imminent because the focus on Russian collusion and that issue is very strong. And if you turn on MSNBC, you're going to get pretty much a nightly dose of the prosecutor's case against Donald Trump.

Meanwhile, as Greenfield was admitting that CNN and other outlets cater to the anti-Trump crowd, Tanden was whining about how the liberal media wasn’t doing more to amplify the voices of liberals. “The majority in this country oppose Trump. It seems to me The New York Times or other sources could at least have equal expression for those voices,” she bemoaned.

Greenfield appeared shocked by Tanden’s ignorance of how The New York Times operated. “Well, if you are a regular reader of The New York Times, for the last two and a half years you have gotten a full dose of view that Donald Trump is hellaciously unfit to be president,” he stated. Greenfield made it obvious that he wasn’t a fan of Trump but noted that he recently wrote a piece sharing the views of those who supported the President.

Yet Tanden wouldn’t stop complaining about the “resistance” not getting covered enough:

I think the issue is: Does the mainstream media want to cover both of these voices, the people marching on the streets as well as the people who still support Donald Trump. I think both of those are reasonable. But when you have a variety of outlets that continue to go to the voices of one side, I think people -- liberals are legitimately asking questions about that.

It’s hilarious that Tanden could still claim that the media wasn’t supportive of anti-Trump forces when part of the conversation was about how it was a special event for The New York to have writers supporting Trump. And add to that Greenfield admitting that CNN was hyping a Trump indictment long before the conclusion of the special counsel probe.

The relevant portions of the transcript are below: