I have been sitting on a complete draft of Sleazy Stories IV for a few months now, and I could have put out a fifth book in this series by now as well. However, I can’t quite bring myself to continue with it. At some point in the not-too-distant future I most certainly will, however. It is one thing to indulge in boundless hedonism. As shallow as it may sound to some, it certainly has its appeal. I never understood why people take drugs and I bet there are people who don’t understand why guys who have the opportunity to do so would want to bang one woman after another.

Yet, if you are a Giga-Chad, you’re not operating in a societal vacuum. As much as you may want to tell yourself that you are getting all those women because you are so desirable, it is not the complete story. The missing aspect is that you can only get them because society has been falling apart. Due to “female liberation”, a lot of women no longer think that being a loving wife and mother are desirable lifegoals. Instead, they are so deluded that they think promiscuity is something to be proud of. “This girl fucks,” they proudly pronounce on social media, not realizing that basically any girl can get any amount of dick she wants. It’s social engineering on a massive scale. Very few women seem to realize that female promiscuity is a mere projection. They know of men who a lot of women want to have sex with and somehow they think that if they had a lot of sex with men, it would make them more attractive to men in return. In the short term, this is true because easy women are certainly “popular” among guys. In the long run, on the othe rhand, the exact opposite is true, of course, because nobody wants to marry a slut.

Promiscuity is just one of the big societal ills. It undermines female pair-bonding ability and thus it is a prime means for destroying the nuclear family. This process is quite advanced in many Western countries. To pick one extreme case, in Sweden, more than 50% of households have only one person in it. Sure, enjoy your sluts in your youth, but be aware that this is merely a symptom of a fundamentally broken society. We would be a lot better off if women kept their legs together (and cut off support for single mothers).

Promiscuity is only one problem, though. Another is rampant homosexuality. Now you may think that there is nothing wrong with homosexuality, but view it from this angle: in the past, homosexual men often married because it was a societal expectation. They had a wife and children, while indulging in affairs on the side. The wife most certainly wasn’t too concerned about it because she still got the husband’s financial support, and her kids. For society, this was also a positive outcome because if you could afford a wife in the 19th or early 20th century, you probably did a lot better than the average Joe. There is a link between intelligence and economic success, so the gene pool got replenished with some quality genes.

Fast forward to the present time, we witness unhinged homosexuality and guys who would have been play-acting being upstanding family men now shack up with other men and follow a life of hedonism. They won’t have any children, so hedonism may appear to be the rational choice. There are also rather ugly sides to homosexuality in this day and age, as evinced by the prevalence of drugs and sexually-transmitted diseases. That’s hardly a benefit for society either. Even in countries in which there is no socialized health care, you are still allocating resources in a suboptimal way as there is an alternative world in which homosexuality is pursued clandestinely, as opposed to a absurdities like gay men looking for guys to infect them with AIDS.

I don’t care much for lesbians. I have never met a genuinely attractive lesbian, so I’m quite tempted to believe that only women who cannot land a man enter sexual relationships with other women. The fact that a lot of women discover that they are lesbians at around the time they hit the wall, and desirable cocks to hop on are impossible to come by, further supports this hypothesis. In the past, those women would have been spinsters. They just don’t play a role for the health of the gene pool.

Promiscuity and rampant homosexuality are bad enough, but society has not decayed enough yet in the mind of our cultural-marxist overlords. The current push is normalizing pedophilia. Nowadays, not only will you find mainstream books describing sex with children on display in public libraries, you also have child-minders in kindergarten and primary school teachers provide sex education. Pedophilia is only a stepping stone, however. Our woke overlords apparently not only want to fuck little children, they also want to toy with little transgender boys and girls, but teens are also fine. In California, 5-year-olds get brainwashed with transgenderism. The UK isn’t far behind either, and the same is true of any other Western country.

All of this may sound completely insane to you, and that’s because it is. I think there is only one plausible explanation that ties all those symptoms of societal decay together. For that, you have remind yourself that the key tenet of classic Marxism was that the workers of the world would unite and overthrow the capitalist ruling class. Afterwards, utopia would somehow create itself. Now that Marxism has failed everywhere it has been tried, with a total death count that makes the Nazis look like choir boys, the new angle is cultural marxism. It likewise has the goal of overthrowing society. Again, after the chaos, utopia is supposed to emerge. I presume that’s a society in which old and grey lefties have sex with all the children they want, while robots do all the work. It’s probably something along the lines. You can bet that the elites have not properly thought it through, treating the realities of their utopia as some kind of afterthought and a minor issue that will be resolved easily once society has been destroyed. I guess all those robots will eventually build themselves. (I think the “sigularity” is nonsense, but that’s a separate topic.)

Indeed, what better way is there to destroy society than to completely break up the nuclear family? First you turn the women into whores, which turns them into shitty wives and mothers. The divorce rate skyrockets and single mothers raise future criminals. More and more men check out because they realize that a shit sandwhich isn’t worth breaking your back for. They prefer going their own way instead of marrying and having kids. Promoting homosexuality certainly is only a further boost to that. A century ago, a billionaire like Peter Thiel would have had a wife and eight children. Today, he’s openly gay. It’s a loss for society. To really wreck society, though, you can’t just corrupt teenage girls. No, instead you now push pedophilia and transgenderism on society as well. Give it a decade or two, and things will be so fucked up that you will wistfully think back to how sane society was in 2019.

Did you enjoy this article? Excellent! Here are some further steps to consider:

1) If you want to read more from Aaron, check out his excellent books, the latest of which are Sleazy Stories II, Sleazy Stories III, and Meditation Without Bullshit.

2) Aaron is available for one-on-one consultation sessions if you want honest advice.

3) Donations for the upkeep of this site are highly welcome.

Share this: Reddit

Facebook

Twitter

WhatsApp

Pocket

LinkedIn

Email

