COULD

COULD

COULD

COULD

COULD

COULD

Down with the Police State! No More Police! Things like this get thrown out a lot by social libertarians and anarchists alike, even getting the attention and involvement of a few Republicans and Democrats who see the brutality of the police without noticing the monopoly of force they impose on the regular. There is however an aspect of ridding ourselves of this compulsory reactionary force of police missed by a majority of people; the fact that without the police of today, the ones who are paid for through compulsory and mandatory taxation, without recourse or ability to address grievances, wehave more security personnel.Crazy aspect right? Not really. Many of the advocates of ending the Police State and the obligatory manner in which they are funded and operate are also proponents of private property and the rights of the owners. Under this idea the owners of every property, whether commercial or residentialhave the possibility to hire their own private security services. Under this model every store you walk into in a mall type setting could have their own security officers, from different service providers. Also, in the residential sense, each homehave their own services being provided, not much unlike security systems installed in their homes already, but enlarged or advanced to include property security, investigations in the instance of property violations, and preventative security measures to reduce or preclude any attempt violations of property.Local story of an prior law enforcement officer starting a private security firm. Click Here. As the police today are for the most part becoming an aggressive force, one that needs to be checked by the people. Market provided services and funded by voluntary meansprovided a service of security while ridding the public of compulsory funded, hyper-aggressive and increasingly militarized agents of the government. I stress the wordin this because without a doubt, this is only in theory but I feel should be at least recognized and investigated as an alternative. It is also only abecause as security is a personal value assessed by individuals, it is up to the owners of each property to make the choice to have security or not.