This email has also been verified by Google DKIM 2048-bit RSA key

Fwd: Tomorrow

From:tcarrk@hillaryclinton.com To: john.podesta@gmail.com Date: 2015-06-22 18:55 Subject: Fwd: Tomorrow

Sir, Here is what is in the q and a. In regards to the multiple devices I'm still pulling that language *How do YOU respond to lawmakers who have accused YOU of possibly violating the law by deleting emails from YOUR server? Will YOU agree to testify before the Benghazi Select Committee?* · I have already fully explained how I decided to use a personal email account during my time as Secretary of State. It is well documented that this decision fully complied with the law. I have turned over 50,000 pages of my emails from my time at the State Department. I’ve urged the State Department to release them as soon as possible. · I testified once already before Congress about Benghazi, and I have made clear I am prepared to do so again. In fact, I have already agreed to publicly testify before the Select Committee in an open hearing. *A federal judge has instructed the State Department to release your emails on a rolling basis rather than all at once as the State Department had proposed. Won’t this approach hurt your campaign?* · As I have said before, I have turned over 50,000 pages of my emails from my time at the State Department and asked them to be reviewed and made public as soon as possible. I am proud of the work that I did with the diplomats and development experts there during my tenure, and the emails will make that work clear to the American public. So I'm as eager as anyone to see them released, so that people can see for themselves. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- I'm at a Silicon Valley fundraiser tonight and likely to get back into email land. Can you forward me whatever our last q&a or briefing document is on the topic.. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Begin forwarded message: * Hi Ann and Stephanie -- Looking forward to our discussion tomorrow night. I suspect it will be broad ranging. Few things: 1. are the two of you and john planning on spending about 15 mins chatting about the inside of the campaign, and policy broadly, and then opening up to Q&A for about 45 mins or doing all Q&A? I Actually think that it'd be great for y'all to hit on some key policy items first and i know folks would enjoy the inside glance at the campaign. 2. I plan to do an intro and Jeff will close with a very brief how to get involved. I'll then close with a special toast and treat. I have not reached out to John - -please let me know if you think I should. Couple of questions that came in: 1. you're obviously amongst friends, but here's the one i referred to (can't remember which of you i talked about it with, if not both). It's from someone that wasn't goign to come, and i encouraged him to come. he comes at the issue slightly differnetly than what I've dsicussed with both of you (Ok, one thing to use personal email, but why the "twisted truth" (not my words) on why - with the two problematic areas being (a) emails to bill (when they were to bill's staff) and (b) i only used one device -- BB, when 2 weeks earlier, it was an iphone, BB and ipad. As Ann and I discussed, hopefully that's a timing issue and whilst in state, she only used one. :) *For my question*, it's basically some variation of [not quite phrased right yet]: I know when I talk to my friends who are attorneys we are all struggling with what happened to the emails and aren't satisfied with answers to date. While we all know of the occasional use of personal email addresses for business, none of my friends circle can understand how it was viewed as ok/secure/appropriate to use a private server for secure documents AND why further Hillary took it upon herself to review them and delete documents without providing anyone outside her circle a chance to weigh in. It smacks of acting above the law and it smacks of the type of thing I've either gotten discovery sanctions for, fired people for, etc. 2) someone wants to ask a very specific question about updating export control laws - and why they've haven't been updated since (??) as they prevent american businesses selling abroad (she's GC of a consumer drone company). Going to the 20,000 foot level, you'lll do well to talk about needing to ensure regulation that's designed to protect consumers - yet not so much that it prevents innovation, like what happens here in SV, which has been the economic bright spot of our economy. The goverenment of the 21st century will need to be more nimble, and quicker to respond to rapidly changing busiensses, yet also ensure that it's not rash, and it regulates for not just for today but the future. too 3) we'll see whether asked - but I would suspect something on the balance of 4th amendment and cyber - and the US govt's request for companies to provide a backdoor to encryption -- we discussed that yesterday. 4) Number three leads to a more general and i think thoughtful question - -which permeates every aspect of our country - from the economy, to the government to institutions like health care, defense, education and the justice system. Trust of the American public in American institutions : A poll was just released showing that trust in Congress, the presidency, the Supreme Court, big business, Wall Street, etc. is at historic lows. That does not bode well for the country (and in fact the military seems to be the only institution that Ameicans trust, which is evocative of a third world nation and not of the world's leading nation, for now). http://www.gallup.com/poll/183605/confidence-branches-government-remains-low.aspx?utm_source=position2&utm_medium=related&utm_campaign=tiles ------------------------- The issues that Reid and I teed up for john when he was at the tech roundtable with Steph and Amanda at LinkedIn were: - surveillance and national security - the proper balance (it is not an either or -- it is an 'and') - patent reform (less of an issue with s ct decision) - net neutrality, and, of course, - email issue There should be a good crowd, but unfortunately a number of folks are out of town, and in terms of GC's, a number have annual meetings and the like. Nonetheless, there will be a reasonable showing - prob about 50 folks (though about 70 have said they're coming). They range from tech folks to GC's to law firm counsel to non profits to STanford folk and even one union leader (SEIU) may show. Steph, in terms of recruiting - -there are a few people that might be helpful - and each of them is a wonderful human being. Though I don't know that any are looking, they're defnitely worthwhile talking to: - Madeline Fackler, who was recently CIO for Johnson and Johnson. She and her atty husband split their time between here and NYC. - Ian McNish - one of the very early infrastructure folks at LinkedIn - he joined when the company was still in a garage. He's been at Box for the last couple of years advising them on IT, infrastructure and Ops. He may be looking for something BIG to be a part of. Tireless, passoinate, brilliant person. Catch will be his wonderful girlfriend, also from linkedin, now heads up communicatoins/PR at GogoBot. (she too will be here - adn they'll both stay for the afterparty. they're a hoot) - Ian McCarthy - consumer digital media. also early LI employee, and has been at a number of startups. Terrific guy. - Unfortunately folks who were responsible for "growth" and some of the data scientists didn't respond, and i didn't have time to followup......we should set up some time to talk offline if you want. Hope this helps, and please do let me know if i can be of any help, though i'm out of pocket for most of tomorrow (talkign on cybersecurity at stanford directors college). Cheers, erika 650.417.5722