With increasing attention paid to use of cannabis in CVS, Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome (CHS) has been proposed as a distinct entity by the Rome Foundation. CHS, the role of cannabis in hyperemesis, and the overlap between CHS and CVS are described in a separate manuscript included with these CVS guidelines.

Recommendations for the diagnosis of CVS, suggested investigations, treatment protocol for the emergency department (ED), and algorithm for management are also provided. These recommendations are based on best practices and consensus of the committee members. These were formulated based on review of the available literature and the collective experience of the committee members who have taken care of more than 3000 patients with CVS in their practices.

This article represents an official statement of the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS) and the Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome Association (CVSA) on the diagnosis and management of CVS in adults. The target audience for this guideline includes gastroenterologists, emergency medicine physicians, primary care providers, other clinicians, patients, and policymakers. The committee developed and graded the recommendations and assessed the certainty in the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. The committee members, who were selected jointly by the CVSA and a council member of the ANMS clinical guidelines committee, included primarily gastroenterologists with clinical and research expertise, providers from other disciplines, such as psychology and neurology, methodologists with experience in evidence appraisal and guideline development, and one patient representative, who was also President of the CVSA. The panel chair was a gastroenterologist. Conflicts of interest of all participants were managed according to ANMS policies. At the time of appointment, a majority of the guideline panel, including the chair and the vice‐chair, had no conflicts of interest as defined and judged by ANMS policies. This manuscript was prepared by committee members and a patient advocate who served as part of the committee in order to incorporate patient values and preferences while developing recommendations, as per the GRADE methodology. A librarian conducted the literature search and two GRADE experts reviewed and graded the literature. The reader is referred to the accompanying technical review for a more detailed understanding of the process and additional details about individual studies. The committee had four in‐person meetings and multiple conference calls during this process. Committee members except for the two GRADE experts voted on all recommendations and either “agreed” or “disagreed” and votes were tallied.

Cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS) is a chronic functional gastrointestinal disorder that is being increasingly recognized in adults. It is characterized by episodic nausea and vomiting and is associated with significant morbidity. Approximately one‐third of adult patients become disabled. There is considerable variation in recognition, diagnosis, and management of CVS. The diagnosis for CVS is based on Rome criteria, first developed in 2006 and subsequently revised in 2016. Although their sensitivity and specificity in making a diagnosis of CVS has not been determined, the current Rome IV symptom‐based criteria established a uniform, symptom‐based framework that is useful in clinical practice. While other disorders of nausea and vomiting such as gastroparesis may be confused with CVS, these disorders lack the stereotypical and sudden onset of symptoms, features that appear to be fairly unique to CVS. With further research, the clinical features of CVS will become better delineated, and this information is likely to influence future iterations of symptom‐based CVS diagnostic criteria. For example, many patients with CVS experience abdominal pain during an acute attack, but this feature is not currently incorporated in the Rome IV CVS criteria and should be considered in future revisions.

Treatment of CVS should be based on a biopsychosocial care model, integrating lifestyle modification, prophylactic and/or abortive medications, and evidenced‐based psychotherapy to address psychiatric comorbidity. Ongoing care by a dedicated team will likely improve overall healthcare outcomes. Given the lack of validated outcomes to assess the severity of CVS, the committee arbitrarily defined severity as mild, moderate, or severe based on the frequency and duration of episodes, need for healthcare utilization, and impact of symptoms on activities of daily living as shown in shown in Figure 1 . We recommend using prophylactic medications in moderate‐to‐severe CVS and offering abortive medications to all patients to terminate an acute attack. Recommendations for prophylactic and abortive medications and rationale for their use are discussed below and are summarized in Table 1 .

Riboflavin, a precursor of flavin mononucleotide and flavin‐adenosine‐dinucleotide, cofactors for multiple reduction‐oxidation enzymes play an important role in oxidative reactions in mitochondria respiratory chain complexes. Prophylactic treatment in migraine shows a significant reduction in headache frequency, good treatment adherence, and excellent tolerability. In a systematic review of the efficacy of riboflavin as prophylactic therapy, riboflavin was associated with a positive therapeutic effect in five clinical trials in adults with migraine. Most migraine studies report doses of riboflavin of 200 mg twice daily. Based upon this indirect evidence, one may also consider riboflavin as an additional prophylactic supplement in adult CVS patients.

Coenzyme Q10 (Co‐Q10), a natural steroid‐derived hydrophobic compound, serves as the electron shuttle between complexes 1 or 2 and complex 3 of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. Co‐Q10 has shown efficacy in migraine prophylaxis. One retrospective Internet survey compared the efficacy, tolerability, and patient satisfaction of Co‐Q10 (n = 32) with amitriptyline (n = 249) in children with CVS. The prophylactic treatment of CVS with Co‐Q10 showed overall efficacy of 68%, without side effects (0/22). The study had limitations: the retrospective and subjective nature of questionnaires, the lack of a proven diagnosis of CVS, the self‐selection bias in Internet questionnaire studies, the smaller number of subjects treated with Co‐Q10, and the wide variability of Co‐Q10 duration, dosage, brands, and preparations used (gel capsules, liquids, tablets). Boles et al recommended Co‐Q dose of 10 mg/kg per day in two divided doses, up to 200 mg bid (either in liquid or gel capsule formulation). For refractory cases, they suggest obtaining blood Co‐Q10 levels and increasing the dose to achieve a target blood level of 3 mg/L.

Mitochondrial dysfunction is a probable contributory factor in the pathogenesis of both CVS and migraine headache. Migraine sufferers exhibit decreased respiratory complex function in imaging and enzyme assays and is likely present in CVS, though specific studies are lacking. In addition, both conditions have strong preferential maternal inheritance. Childhood CVS frequently progresses to migraine headache. There is a high prevalence of migraine among close relatives with CVS and both often respond to similar medications. Given the links between these two disorders, mitochondrial supplements have been used in the prophylaxis of CVS.

The doses of zonisamide and levetiracetam used for CVS prophylaxis mirror those used to prevent seizures. For zonisamide, a starting dose of 100 mg PO daily is typical, with weekly increases of 100 mg/day to target a final dose of 400 mg/day. Levetiracetam is typically started at 500 mg PO in divided doses twice daily and increased by 500 mg weekly until the target dose of ~1000–2000 mg/day is achieved. Generic formulations are not particularly expensive. Neither agent requires routine serum monitoring of liver or renal function, but lower doses should be used in those with established liver or renal disease. Finally, newer AEDs related to zonisamide and levetiracetam, such as lacosamide or brivaracetam, are now available, but it remains to be seen if these newer agents are as effective in prophylaxis of CVS episodes.

The evidence supporting the use of zonisamide or levetiracetam as prophylactic therapy in CVS is based on one retrospective case series of 20 adult patients. However, the benefits of this therapeutic approach have been substantiated by additional clinical experience. In their report, Clouse and colleagues described adults who suffered from about 12 episodes/year and had failed to respond to TCA therapy. The substantial reduction in the number of CVS attacks from a mean of 1.3 ± 0.3 to 0.5 ± 0.2 episodes/year in response to zonisamide or levetiracetam was quite notable. Ultimately, the majority (75%) of patients on zonisamide or levetiracetam reported a moderate clinical response, and 20% experienced a complete cessation of episodes. The mean duration of follow‐up was 9.5 months (minimum: 3 months). Side effects of fatigue, confusion, impaired concentration, or headache were commonly reported by patients, but those with more severe side effects tolerated the switch to the alternative AED very well.

Zonisamide is an oral sulfonamide anti‐epileptic (AED) with direct influence on sodium and calcium channel function as well as modulation of GABAergic receptors. It has high bioavailability with a fairly long half‐life (~60 hours) and is metabolized in the liver by CYP3A4 enzymes before renal excretion. Levetiracetam is an AED that may act primarily via its binding to synaptic vesicle protein 2 (SV2) and subsequent influence on SV2‐dependent neurotransmitter release, as well as an influence on intracellular Ca 2+ homeostasis and neuronal excitability. Levetiracetam is an oral medication with high bioavailability and fairly short half‐life (~6‐8 hours) and is not significantly metabolized before renal excretion.

Based upon the data in children and adolescents and the clinical experince of committee members, we recommend initiating aprepitant as an alternate/second‐line prophylactic treatment in patients who are refractory to standard therapy with TCAs or topiramate. The suggested dose is 125 mg twice a week for adults >60 kg and 80 mg twice weekly in adults 40‐60 kg. Costs per capsule of Emend ® ($120‐230) or generic aprepitant ($47‐90) are high and must be considered when prescribing this medication.

There is a single open‐label trial of aprepitant used prophylactically to treat CVS in children and adolescents refractory to conventional treatment. This trial included adolescents weighing >60 kg who were treated with 125 mg twice weekly. At 12 months, in an intention‐to‐treat analysis, of 16 children and adolescents who were treated with a prophylactic regimen, 82% achieved a complete resolution of episodes or partial response (>50% reduction in frequency and intensity). Based on these criteria, 19% (3/16) had a complete response and 62% (10/16) had a partial response. Side effects encountered include hiccups (19%), fatigue (13%), increased appetite (13%), mild headache (6%), and severe migraine in one patient (6%). Additional side effects in adults include constipation (up to 39%), in trials in CINV. In a 4‐week, multicenter, randomized double‐masked trial of 126 adults with gastroparesis (and related syndromes), although oral aprepitant (125 mg) failed to significantly reduce nausea when measured by visual analog criteria, it achieved the secondary outcomes of significant reduction in nausea and vomiting severity index as measured by the Gastroparesis Clinical Symptom Index. Most trials in CINV used aprepitant in combination with 5HT 3 antagonists and corticosteroids. Nine task force members have used aprepitant prophylactically in adolescents or adults with some success in preventing episodes.

Aprepitant is a relatively new (approved 2003) substance P/neurokinin 1 receptor (NK1) highly selective, high‐affinity antagonist antiemetic agent. It binds to receptors in the nucleus tractus solitarius that mediate the emetic motor reflex. It has been used to prevent acute and delayed (>24 hours) vomiting induced by moderate and highly emetogenic chemotherapy as well as in post‐operative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Although the plasma half‐life is 9‐13 hours, clinical effects may persist for 3‐5 days. Significant inhibitors (eg, grapefruit juice, clarithromycin) and inducers (eg, enzalutamide, topiramate) of CYP3A4 system increase and decrease levels, respectively, and are to be avoided if possible. Caution is recommended in patients with severe liver disease.

We recommend starting topiramate at 25 mg daily and titrating by 25 mg each week to a target dose of 100 mg daily (50 mg b.i.d. or 100 mg XL single dose). Blood levels may be obtained for therapeutic monitoring, and the dose further increased until clinical response is achieved, or side effects (cognitive dysfunction, paresthesia, headache, fatigue, dizziness, or mood problems) occur. Weight loss from appetite reduction is a side effect and may be desired, in patients who are overweight or obese. We recommend monitoring serum electrolytes and renal function twice a year as metabolic acidosis may occur. Oral bicarbonate supplementation may be initiated if serum bicarbonate is <20 mmol/L. There is a slightly increased risk of developing renal stones. Female patients should be informed that topiramate can interfere with the efficacy of oral contraceptives.

Topiramate may be used as an alternative prophylactic medication in moderate‐to‐severe CVS. Several studies show that topiramate is effective in preventing migraine headaches, but there is limited evidence on its utility in CVS. One retrospective study of 16 children treated with topiramate found that 81% became episode free, 13% showed at least ≥50% reduction in number of episodes, and only 6% did not respond. In a retrospective study of 18 adults treated with prophylactic topiramate, 72% had ≥50% reduction in frequency/severity of CVS episodes. Some patients on topiramate were also receiving AT and mitochondrial supplements in this study.

The evidence was considered very low quality despite the fact that there were 14 studies, given issues with selection bias, confounding, co‐interventions (supplements), and variation in outcomes reported across the different studies. Despite this, the committee members including the patient representative unanimously agreed that TCAs are extremely effective prophylaxis in CVS based on their collective experience and made a strong recommendation for its use. The committee acknowledged that conducting a RCT would be difficult due to lack of funding and potential difficulties with recruitment for the control arm, rendering the availability of high‐quality evidence difficult to obtain in the future. Further, side effects associated with AT would make it difficult to blind patients to the drug vs. placebo, which may skew the results of RCTs in favor of a response to AT

The mean effective dose in adults is 75‐100 mg daily or 1‐1.5 mg/kg body weight. Amitriptyline is best titrated in 10‐25 mg increments as this improves tolerability by allowing adaptation to and preventing discontinuation from side effects, particularly daytime sedation. This improves the ultimate efficacy of the medication. Most of the panelists used 10 mg but some used 25 mg. As always, this needs to be individualized based upon the patient response. The incidence of side effects with AT varies from 9% to 25% although this did not result in discontinuation of the drug in most studies. Side effects include daytime sedation, weight gain, dryness of mouth, and constipation. The night‐time administration of AT can often promote sleep, whereas the lingering daytime sedation tends to improve or resolve in 8‐12 weeks. Though most studies have only evaluated AT, NT may be used alternatively to minimize side effects. Given the risk of prolongation of the QTc interval and cardiac arrhythmias, we recommend obtaining an EKG at baseline, once during titration at ~50 mg and after the target dose is reached. More frequent monitoring will vary between individual patients, based on their response to AT and concomitant use of other medications that can prolong the QT interval. It is recommended that the QTc be maintained at <470 msec for women and <450 msec for men. The dosage of AT should be reduced or stopped if there is QTc prolongation or development of significant side effects. The incidence of cardiac arrhythmias appears to be low, and no serious adverse events have been reported with its use in CVS. Serious psychiatric side effects such as psychotic reactions, hypomania, and delirium may occur with the treatment of depression with amitriptyline but are not reported in CVS, perhaps due to the higher doses typically used to treat the former.

The evidence on the use of TCAs in adults with CVS is based on open‐label and retrospective studies and two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in children. There were fourteen studies that included 600 adult and pediatric patients. Across these studies, 413/600 (70%) of patients reported complete or partial improvement with a decrease in frequency, duration, or severity of CVS symptoms when treated with a TCA, most commonly amitriptyline. A few well‐conducted studies are highlighted here. Hejazi et al in an open‐label study of 46 patients demonstrated a marked reduction in the number of CVS episodes from 17 to 3, in the duration of a CVS episode from 6 to 2 days, and in the number of ED visits/hospitalizations from 15 to 3.3 with AT. Kumar et al in a retrospective study of 70 patients showed that the majority of patients (86%) responded to treatment with AT. Some of these patients were also treated with other agents such as topiramate and mitochondrial supplements such as Co‐Q10 and L‐carnitine. An observational study found that of 24 patients who received AT for at least 3 months, 93% had a reduction in symptoms measured by a visual analog scale, while 26% had complete remission of symptoms.

Amitriptyline (AT) is a tricyclic antidepressant, a mixed serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor that also interacts with cholinergic, and multiple histamine receptors and ion channels. Amitriptyline is converted by cytochrome P4502C19 (CYP2C19) to nortriptyline (NT). Both AT and NT are converted by CYP2D6 to their inactive metabolite. Genetic polymorphisms in CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 can affect the efficacy and side effect profile of TCAs. Prophylactic therapy with TCAs should be considered in patients who have moderate‐to‐severe CVS. Moderate‐to‐severe CVS is defined by one or more of the following: ≥4 episodes/year, episodes >2 days in duration, severe episodes that require emergency department (ED) visits or hospitalization, or episodes that significantly interfere with activities of daily living. Patient preferences need to be taken into consideration prior to initiating prophylactic therapy.

Based upon low‐quality evidence in children and adolescents and positive clinical experience, the committee recommends aprepitant as a potentially effective second‐line abortive agent. We recommend using a standard dosing regimen of 125 mg, 80 mg, and 80 mg on three consecutive days with the first dose to be taken as early in the prodrome and before the onset of vomiting. The target individuals in whom abortive aprepitant is recommended include those who are refractory to standard abortive therapy (eg, sumatriptan and ondansetron) and those who have a defined prodrome or a predictable periodicity (episode which occurs in relation to the menstrual cycle) in which aprepitant can be initiated a day or two before the anticipated onset of vomiting. Difficulties with obtaining insurance approval for aprepitant and IV fosaprepitant have been a barrier to its use despite demonstrated efficacy.

There is a single open‐label trial of oral aprepitant used as abortive treatment of CVS in children and adolescents who were refractory to conventional treatment. All children >20 kg were given the standard regimen used in chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) of 125 mg initially during the prodrome, then 80 mg daily for the following 2 days as needed. Oral aprepitant could be retained if administered during a prodrome at least 30 minutes before the onset of vomiting. At the end of 12 months, this recurring abortive regimen significantly reduced the duration of episodes from 5 days to 1 day, the number of vomits from 9 to 4 times per hour, and the number of hospital admissions from 9 to 2.5. Side effects appear to be mild, and the medication was well tolerated. There are no data on the use of intravenous fosaprepitant (phosphorylated prodrug of aprepitant) in CVS, although it has been used effectively in moderate and highly emetogenic CINV.

The committee recommends ondansetron as a first‐line agent in aborting an episode of CVS. Based on clinical experience, combining 5‐HT 3 receptor antagonists with other abortive agents such as anxiolytics and phenothiazines for sedation may be more effective in aborting an episode than monotherapy. We note that there is a wide variability of responses with a few patients having a complete abortive response while the majority experience attenuation but not cessation of the episode. Adverse effects are uncommon and may include headache, dizziness, drowsiness, diarrhea, constipation, and infrequently extrapyramidal reactions. A baseline EKG to check for QTc prolongation is recommended in adults prior to initiating this medication. We recommend using 8 mg of ondansetron as a sublingual preparation or rectally (reformulated) at the onset of the prodrome in combination with other abortive medications like triptans, and anxiolytics to abort an episode of CVS. The oral route should be avoided as patients are usually unable to tolerate oral preparations during an episode and also due to the unpredictable absorption of medications during an episode of vomiting.

Despite its wide use in CVS, there is a lack of clinical trials of 5‐HT 3 antagonists in this condition. However, there are ample data demonstrating the efficacy of these agents in CINV and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in treating acute, delayed, and anticipatory nausea and vomiting. Studies indicate that ondansetron is as effective as other 5‐HT 3 receptor antagonists in the treatment of CINV.

Ondansetron is a selective 5‐hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5‐HT 3 ) receptor antagonist. It acts by blocking afferent 5‐HT 3 receptors on the vagus peripherally and centrally in the chemoreceptor trigger zone (CTZ) of the area postrema within the medulla oblongata. These actions result in decreased circulating serotonin at the CTZ level, reducing symptoms of nausea and vomiting in affected patients. Ondansetron is metabolized in the liver by CYP3A4, CYP1A2, and CYP2D6 and is excreted renally.

We recommend administration of triptans during the prodrome or within 30‐45 minutes of the onset of vomiting in an episode. The efficacy appears to diminish after the first 60 minutes. We recommend nasal and injectable administration given uncertain oral absorption in CVS. For the nasal route, we recommend administering the drug, while the head is gently flexed forward to avoid nasopharyngeal dripping of the drug which can have a bitter taste. We recommend using sumatriptan as a nasal spray at 20 mg initially, while a comparable subcutaneous sumatriptan dose in adults is 6 mg. The dose may be repeated in 2 hours if there is no response or a partial response. Sumatriptan should be limited to a maximum of 6 doses/week to avoid overuse. Common side effects include tingling, numbness, dizziness, nausea, and drowsiness. Triptans should not be given to those with underlying coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, or stroke due its vasoconstrictor properties.

In one non–placebo‐controlled study of 11 children with CVS, the efficacy of sumatriptan treatment was high in those with a family history of migraine compared to cases without a family history of migraine. However, those without a family history of migraine still responded to sumatriptan in 50% of their attacks. In this study, sumatriptan was administered by SC injection in nine and via nasal route in three patients. Although the number of patients was small, the administration of sumatriptan reduced vomiting in nine patients (82%) and the nasal route seemed less effective. Three other case reports describe the efficacy of injectable sumatriptan in aborting episodes of CVS. The committee believes that sumatriptan is effective in the acute treatment of CVS although randomized placebo‐controlled studies investigating the efficacy of sumatriptan in CVS attacks are lacking.

Sumatriptan is a serotonin agonist approved for the treatment of migraine. It likely binds to the 5‐HT 1B and 5‐HT 1D receptor subclasses in the meninges, producing constriction of distended dural blood vessels. The efficacy of sumatriptan in migraine is due to multiple sites of action (vascular, neural, and central). There are reports of efficacy of sumatriptan in abdominal migraine, a condition classified in the subgroup of childhood periodic syndromes. CVS is also in the subgroup of periodic syndromes that include migraine and its equivalents. While the mechanisms causing CVS are not well defined, there is a clear‐cut clinical, familial, therapeutic, and likely pathogenic parallel with migraine headaches.

5 TREATMENT OF COMORBID CONDITIONS

5.1 Recommendation 9. We suggest screening and treatment for comorbid conditions such as anxiety, depression, migraine headache, autonomic dysfunction, sleep disorders, and substance use. We suggest referral to appropriate allied health services (psychologist, psychiatrist, neurologist, sleep, or substance use specialist) as indicated Vote: 100% agreement Psychiatric conditions, including anxiety, panic, and depression, are common in adults with CVS, with one systematic review finding a prevalence of 39.7% (CI: 33.6‐46.1). However, few studies used standardized diagnostic interviews to ascertain psychiatric disorders, with most reporting the presence of psychiatric conditions based on either a patient report/chart review or via a screening instrument. One case report described persistent nausea that provoked anxiety, leading to conditioned anticipatory nausea and vomiting that in turn aggravated the patient's CVS. Other studies reported that panic symptoms can trigger episodes of CVS. Taranukha et al recently reported that 41% of adults with CVS had high degrees of psychological distress measured by the Basic Symptom Inventory. Anxiety and mood symptoms may both be risk factors for precipitating episodes of CVS or as a consequence of CVS. It is prudent to assess for psychiatric comorbidity in adult CVS patients. Further, several population studies have found increased symptom burden, functional disability, decreased quality of life, and increased healthcare costs when medical and mental health conditions co‐occur. Migraine headache (including a family history of migraine) is closely linked with CVS. The prevalence of migraine headaches in adults with CVS varies between 13% and 70%. Furthermore, 57% of adult CVS patients (with or without migraine) were reported to have a first and/or second‐degree relative with migraines or migraine variants. It is unclear whether treating migraines independently improves the CVS disease course, but many medications are effective prophylactic therapies (i.e. TCAs, anti‐epileptic drugs) or abortive therapies (ie, triptans) for both conditions. Anecdotally, some committee members have observed that when CVS and migraines co‐occur, they may both respond to TCAs but at different dosages, requiring the clinician to keep titrating the dose upwards even when symptoms of one of the disorders have been abolished. Autonomic function in CVS has been extensively investigated, with findings that many CVS patients exhibit autonomic dysregulation. In a study of 20 adult patients with CVS, 7 (35%) had postural tachycardia. Another study in 22 adults with CVS found 5 (23%) with either postural tachycardia or orthostatic hypotension, while 10 (47%) of the 21 pediatric CVS patients studied by Chelimsky et al reported orthostatic intolerance. Abnormalities in skin sympathetic responses and thermoregulatory sweat tests have also been reported. The report by Chelimsky et al in children suggests that treatment of the underlying autonomic dysfunction reduces the number of vomiting episodes; however, the treatment of CVS and postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) overlaps in the use of supplemental fluid intake, conditioning, and propranolol. Concurrent treatment of the underlying autonomic disorder may be needed particularly in the setting of severe orthostatic symptoms such as chronic daily nausea and subacute symptoms in between acute vomiting episodes. Widespread drug usage has been found in CVS with 39%‐81% using cannabis, 19% alcohol, 36% tobacco, and 17% reliant on narcotics for pain management. Although none of these studies contained a specific comparison group, most of these figures appear to be higher than those found in the general population. Co‐occurring substance use or abuse can interact with medications for the management of CVS and complicate treatment, and thus, standard screening for such disorders and appropriate treatment is indicated. The role of cannabis in CVS and CHS is discussed in detail in a separate paper in this supplement.

5.2 Recommendation 10. We suggest that techniques such as meditation, relaxation and biofeedback be offered as complementary therapy in CVS. These measures are generally devoid of side effects and may improve overall well‐being and patient care outcomes Vote: 100% agreement Cyclic vomiting syndrome is a functional GI disorder that is thought to be due to altered brain‐gut interaction. Episodes of CVS are often triggered by stressors. Functional neuroimaging studies have shown distinct differences in functional connectivity in regions of the brain such as the insular cortex that are associated with processing of emotion, nausea, and pain. This supports the hypothesis that symptoms are centrally mediated and highlights the potential for interventions aimed to reduce stress to positively influence the clinical course of adults with CVS. Mind‐body interventions such as meditation and relaxation as well as lifestyle modifications including regular exercise, good sleep hygiene, and avoidance of fasting and dehydration may help reduce both migraine headache and the frequency of CVS episodes. The emphasis on self‐management skills may also contribute to the patient developing an enhanced sense of efficacy. There is scant literature addressing the use of complementary techniques in adult CVS. Relaxation and biofeedback combined with cognitive behavioral therapy were successful in reducing the frequency of CVS episodes in one adolescent case study. The recommendations provided are summarized in Table 1 and are drawn from a systematic GRADE evaluation of the literature (1‐6 and 8) and expert committee consensus (7,9 and 10). We provide these recommendations with an appreciation of the limited, and low‐quality evidence provided from the literature aiming to bridge the gap between what we know and how we can best help patients at the present time. Table 1. Recommendations for treatment of cyclic vomiting syndrome 1. We strongly recommend that adults with moderate‐to‐severe CVS receive tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) such as amitriptyline, as a first‐line prophylactic medication (very low‐quality evidence) 2. We conditionally recommend that adults with moderate‐to‐severe CVS receive topiramate as an alternate prophylactic medication (very low‐quality evidence) 3. We conditionally recommend that adults with moderate‐to‐severe CVS receive aprepitant as an alternate prophylactic medication (very low‐quality evidence) 4. We conditionally recommend that adults with moderate‐to‐severe CVS receive zonisamide or levetiracetam as an alternate prophylactic medication (very low‐quality evidence) 5. We conditionally recommend using Co‐Q10, and riboflavin as prophylactic therapy in the treatment of CVS. Mitochondrial supplements may be used concurrently in addition to other prophylactic agents (very low‐quality evidence) 6. We conditionally recommend using triptans like sumatriptan to abort symptoms of a CVS episode. (moderate‐quality evidence) 7. We conditionally recommend using serotonin antagonists such as ondansetron to abort symptoms of a CVS episode (consensus statement) 8. We conditionally recommend aprepitant to abort symptoms of a CVS episode (very low‐quality evidence) 9. We suggest screening and treatment for comorbid conditions such as anxiety, depression, migraine headache, sleep disorders, autonomic dysfunction, and substance use. We suggest referral to appropriate allied health services (psychologist, psychiatrist, neurologist, sleep, or substance use specialist) as indicated (consensus statement) 10. We suggest that techniques such as meditation, relaxation and biofeedback be offered as complementary therapy in CVS. These measures are generally devoid of side effects and may improve overall well‐being and patient care outcomes (consensus statement)

5.3 Consensus statement on diagnosis and management of CVS The following section addresses the diagnosis, appropriate investigations, and an algorithm for the treatment of CVS. These recommendations are formulated based on expert opinion, available literature, and indirect evidence and as such are not amenable to GRADE methodology. They are intended to provide a succinct, comprehensive overview of the diagnosis and management of CVS.

5.4 Diagnosis Cyclic vomiting syndrome has typical clinical features, and the hallmark of CVS is the presence of intermittent episodes of severe nausea and vomiting interspersed with symptom‐free intervals. However, patients may experience inter‐episodic nausea or dyspepsia and may not be completely asymptomatic in between typical episodes. This feature of adult CVS was recognized for the first time in the updated Rome IV criteria for CVS (Table 2). At the present time, the expert committee endorses the Rome IV diagnostic criteria for CVS but also acknowledges that the sensitivity and specificity of these criteria have not been subjected to rigorous study. The use of chronic cannabis in CVS has led to a putative new diagnosis of CHS and is discussed in a separate article in this special supplement. Table 2. Rome IV criteria for cyclic vomiting syndrome Stereotypical episodes of vomiting regarding onset (acute) and duration (<1 week) At least three discrete episodes in the prior year and two episodes in the past 6 months, occurring at least 1 week apart Absence of vomiting between episodes, but other milder symptoms can be present between cycles Supportive remarks: Personal or family history of migraine headaches Criteria must be fulfilled for the last 6 months with symptom onset at least 3 months before diagnosis There are four phases of CVS: prodromal phase, vomiting phase, recovery, and asymptomatic or inter‐episodic phase. During the prodrome, patients have intense nausea, some with symptoms of panic. Autonomic symptoms such as diarrhea, cold and hot flashes, and profuse sweating may also be present. This is followed by the acute emetic phase where patients will have severe vomiting and retching. The vomiting can often be relentless varying from 1 to 6 times/hour, and the retching often persists even after the stomach has been completely emptied. Abdominal pain is very common and can be present in up to 70% adults with CVS. Restlessness and intense feelings of thirst with accompanying “drinking and guzzling” behavior may also be observed. Other symptoms include a migraine headache, photosensitivity, and phonosensitivity. Patients are often unable to articulate and have been described as being in a “conscious coma.” Patients sometimes induce vomiting by sticking a finger in their throat to obtain symptomatic relief. This should not be misinterpreted as self‐induced vomiting or bulimia. Episodes usually begin in the early morning hours though this is variable. The four phases of CVS are depicted in Figure 2. The recovery phase varies from hours to days, and patients are slowly able to resume oral intake and return to baseline. A proposed data collection sheet for use in clinic to capture the salient features while entertaining a diagnosis of CVS is shown in Table 3. Figure 2 Open in figure viewer PowerPoint Schematic representation of the four phases of cyclic vomiting syndrome and their therapeutic goals. Table 3. Proposed data collection sheet for cyclic vomiting syndrome 1 Demographics Age, Gender, Race 2 Characteristics of a CVS episode Date of onset Frequency of vomiting episodes over the previous 12 months and since onset of symptoms Duration of a typical episode (hours, days) Number of emeses/hour Presence of other symptoms, particularly abdominal pain and migraine headache Presence of inter‐episodic quiescent/asymptomatic intervals and any changes over time Presence of inter‐episodic nausea/dyspepsia Specific triggers—stress both positive and negative, relation to menstrual period, weather, anesthesia, surgery, travel/motion sickness, sleep deprivation, food, allergies. Alleviating factors—taking frequent and long hot showers/baths; sitting in a dark, quiet room, sleep, using cannabis 3 CVS episode Prodromal phase—presence, duration, symptomsa 4 Prior prophylactic treatment (dose and duration) and response to medications TCAs such as amitriptyline Anti‐epileptic drugs (topiramate, zonisamide, and levetiracetam) NK1 receptor antagonists (aprepitant) Mitochondrial supplements (Co‐Q10, riboflavin) 5 Prior abortive medications Triptans (such as sumatriptan), serotonin receptor antagonists (ondansetron), benzodiazepines, NK1 receptor antagonists 6 Health care utilization No. of emergency department/urgent care visits/hospitalizations over the past year and since onset of CVS symptoms 7 Comorbid conditions Migraine headache Irritable bowel syndrome Fibromyalgia Anxiety Depression Panic disorder Autonomic dysfunction Seizures GERD Cardiac conditions (hypertension, coronary artery disease) 8 Family history Migraine, CVS, anxiety, fibromyalgia, neurological disorders 9 Social history Smoking nicotine, a cannabis, alcohol use 10 Investigations Blood work, EGD, Imaging studies of the abdomen Fleischer et al described patterns of coalescence with CVS wherein over a period of time, the duration of individual episodes gets longer while asymptomatic intervals shorten, eventually leading to a pattern that resembles chronic daily vomiting. In others, chronic daily nausea becomes superimposed on acute vomiting episodes resulting in continuous symptomatology and disability. Encountering a patient in a coalescent phase of their illness presents a diagnostic challenge as the illness may not be recognizable as CVS by most clinicians. When the typical episodic pattern is lost (often occurring over years), a careful history focusing on symptoms at the onset of the disorder is important to make an accurate diagnosis, as most patients endorse a discernable cyclic pattern that was part of the initial presentation.

5.5 Investigations The Rome IV criteria for the diagnosis of CVS require that there is “no organic pathology” to explain the symptoms. Hence, it is reasonable to pursue some higher‐yield diagnostic investigations to exclude other disorders that may mimic CVS. Unfortunately, many patients with CVS are subjected to extensive and often repetitive diagnostic testing before the diagnosis is even considered. Diagnosing CVS efficiently and in a cost‐effective manner can be achieved by early clinical recognition based upon the Rome IV criteria, followed by a limited diagnostic workup to exclude alternative disorders. The following suggestions reflect the committee's expert opinion as there is limited published data pertaining to approach. A basic workup for a patient with previously uninvestigated episodes of vomiting should include biochemical, endoscopic, and potentially radiographic assessments. Biochemical testing should include the following: a complete blood count, serum electrolytes and glucose, liver panel, lipase, and urinalysis. Although patients will undoubtedly receive some testing in an ED setting if presenting with a CVS episode, in general diagnostic tests should be performed after resolution to minimize confounding variables such as dehydration. An esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) should be performed to exclude organic pathology such a gastric volvulus, which may mimic CVS in rare instances. It is important not to over‐interpret some endoscopic findings, such as a Mallory‐Weiss tear, mild gastritis, or esophagitis as being causal, when those findings may more likely be epiphenomena reflective of recent retching and vomiting. Imaging studies including a right upper quadrant ultrasound could reveal biliary disease, and a small bowel follow‐through or CT/MR enterography may also be able to exclude any obstructive lesions within the small bowel. Gastric emptying tests are not typically useful in the diagnostic workup as patterns of emptying are variable in CVS with patients exhibiting rapid or normal gastric emptying and only a small subset exhibiting delayed gastric emptying. However, these tests may be useful in patients who have inter‐episodic symptoms to help elucidate pathophysiology and tailor therapy. A solid‐phase 4‐hour gastric emptying scan should only be done in the inter‐episodic phase as emptying will clearly be altered or delayed during the sick phase. Both opiates and cannabis can delay gastric emptying. Lastly, patients with any localizing neurological symptoms should undergo brain imaging (CT or MRI) and would justify referral to a neurologist. Investigations for hypothyroidism (thyroid‐stimulating hormone and/or T4/T3 serum levels), acute pancreatitis (serum lipase), Addison disease (serum cortisol and/or an adrenocorticotropin stimulation (ACTH) stimulation test), mitochondrial disease (serum lactate, pyruvate), or less common metabolic disorders such as acute intermittent porphyria (urine porphyrins) may be considered, especially with supporting symptoms. Once a diagnosis of CVS has been established, we recommend assessing severity of CVS, identifying triggers, and recognizing comorbid conditions. An algorithm for the management of CVS is shown in Figure 1. As always, treatment options should be discussed with the patient and patient preferences should be considered. Ongoing care with a team to provide support is crucial to achieve good outcomes.