Last week FIFA announced that it was moving the 2022 World Cup to November or December over concerns that the players would find it too hard to compete in the blistering heat.

One could almost be moved at the concern for the players, if it did not reek of the hypocrisy that taints the administrators of the world’s most popular game. Because while FIFA has been wringing its hands over football playing conditions, they have displayed negligible concern for the conditions of the migrant construction workers who are building the infrastructure and venues for the tournament.

In 2013 it was estimated that over 500 Indian workers were killed in Qatar’s preparations for the 2022 World Cup. This revelation provoked worldwide concern and condemnation of FIFA’s glib attitude towards Qatar’s working conditions.

It even compelled Sepp Blatter to take notice. He travelled to Qatar in November 2013 to “raise the issue of workers’ rights”, but was careful to add that there was no question of the World Cup being taken away from Qatar.

The pros and cons of a winter World Cup for fans Show all 10 1 /10 The pros and cons of a winter World Cup for fans The pros and cons of a winter World Cup for fans PRO: Your liver will thank you In a World Cup year your liver is put through two demanding ordeals - one during the tournament and another in the regular Christmas holidays slot. Combining the two will mean just the one spell of punishing prolonged excessive drinking in 2022. Liam Brown The pros and cons of a winter World Cup for fans CON: England will make Christmas depressing Perhaps Harry Kane will be the best player on the planet and inspire England to their first tournament win since 1966. But chances are neither of those things will happen, England will knocked out and their exit will put a downer on the traditional festivities. GETTY IMAGES The pros and cons of a winter World Cup for fans PRO: Less rubbish Christmas television A heavy schedule of World Cup fixtures will force broadcasters to sideline much of the guff they usually show at Christmas, meaning you won't have to sit through yet another re-run of Love Actually as Peru vs Qatar will be on instead. Rex The pros and cons of a winter World Cup for fans CON: Family relations will take a battering Christmas is a time for families to come together - but football lovers will be compelled to shun their grandmas in order to watch Ecuador vs Iran. Rex Features The pros and cons of a winter World Cup for fans PRO: Christmas shopping just got easier A trip to the shops in the run-up to Christmas is an ordeal - but with half the population in front of the TV, snapping up those football-themed stocking fillers for your loved ones will be a breeze. ANDREW COWIE | AFP | Getty Images The pros and cons of a winter World Cup for fans CON: The true meaning of Christmas The real meaning of Christmas becomes more diluted with every passing year so having the nation more focused on the metatarsal status of England's crocked star striker than the birth of Jesus Christ is unlikely to improve matters. The pros and cons of a winter World Cup for fans PRO: Domestic games in the sun Everyone loves those early and late games of the domestic season when the sun is out and you can go to the football in shorts and T-shirt. Due to the schedule overhaul needed to accommodate the tournament, there will be lots more summer games. Get the flip flops at the ready. GETTY IMAGES The pros and cons of a winter World Cup for fans CON: Fan parks If the 2014 instalment of the World Cup showed us anything, it's that we love a fan park. Images of Americans gathered in their thousands to watch Clint Dempsey 'do a soccer goal' were a highlight of the tournament. But gathering in front of a big screen won't seem so appealing when it's freezing cold. GETTY IMAGES The pros and cons of a winter World Cup for fans PRO: Simon Cowell will be denied A generic Christmas No 1 by the latest X-Factor clone has become almost as inevitable as turkey on your plate on Christmas Day. Surely a football themed Christmas song could beat it in the unique year of 2022? Bob Geldof has probably already started re-writing the lyrics to Do They Know It's Christmas (again). Getty The pros and cons of a winter World Cup for fans CON: January will be double depressing After the high of Christmas, January tends to be a depressing time of year. But add the World Cup excitement on top and the first month of 2023 is already looking bleak. Rex

One year on, to the surprise of no one, nothing has changed. Figures released at the end of 2014 indicated that overall worker deaths were in the region of one a day. They show that Qatar and FIFA are still comfortably on track to fulfil the International Trades Union Confederation’s (ITUC) horrendous prediction that 4,000 workers would be killed in order to enable Qatar to host the World Cup.

This carnage is a symptom of a deeper issue: that of slavery. It is a truism to say that today slavery is everywhere illegal. But is it?

In many places, including the Gulf states as documented by Anti-Slavery International and ITUC’s investigation back in 2011, and Qatar is no exception, slavery is actively facilitated through a system known as “kafalah”. This is a system whereby migrant workers require the “sponsorship” of an employer to obtain work. Once there their passports are confiscated and they are prohibited from changing employers, irrespective of how abusive the employer becomes.

No matter if workers are not being paid for months on end for long hours of hard work in scorching heat or live in squalid conditions. They cannot leave - that would make their status in the country illegal and they would simply be arrested. They can’t even leave the country to go back home without the employer’s written permission.

Qatar winning the bid for the 2022 World Cup in 2010 (Getty Images)

Bluntly put FIFA awarded the World Cup to a slave state, one in which slavery is underpinned by the legal system which treats the workers as disposable commodities not as human beings.

Personally I would love to see the World Cup in Qatar, if it would guarantee that the construction would be completed using decent work, not slavery. But Qatar has not done this and FIFA’s protestations of concern and demands for change have been weak, insincere and utterly ineffectual.

FIFA and Blatter must surely bear a considerable moral responsibility for both the manslaughter and the slavery upon which the 2022 World Cup is being constructed. One would like to imagine that this would weigh heavily on Blatter’s conscience if he has one.

So, as the Messis and Ronaldos take to the pitch in the pleasant coolness of the Qatar winter they will be playing in venues built by a medieval system of cruelty which breaks the lives and bodies of poor people who went to Qatar seeking nothing but a decent living. Instead they found enslavement and death.