"Only the small secrets need to be protected. The big ones are kept secret by public incredulity." — Marshall McCluhan "If both the past and the external world exist only in the mind, and if the mind itself is controllable — what then?" — George Orwell TOP SECRET MAG CHANNELS ONLY DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY PSYCHOTRONIC WARFARE: SPIRITUAL ACCESS Prepared by U.S., Army Medical Intelligence Office D8T-03447/82/018 Top: A Defense Intelligence Agency brief on "Psychotronic Warfare." Bottom: An enlarged x-ray of a brain implant. TABLEOFCONIENTS INTRODUCTION: WAR FOR THE MIND CHAPTER 1 THINGS TO COME 11 CHAPTER 2 LODGE BROTHERS & LITTLE HITLERS 19 CHAPTER 3 TAKING THE "PSYCHE" OUT OF PSYCHOLOGY 27 CHAPTER 4 HEY TEACHERS, LEAVE THOSE KIDS ALONE! 34 CHAPTER 5 TAVISTOCK 41 CHAPTER 6 SHOCKTROOPS 55 CHAPTER 7 OSS ORIGINS 59 CHAPTER 8 GREY EMINENCE 63 CHAPTER 9 ENTER THE CIA 73 CHAPTER 10 COMING ON TO LSD 77 CHAPTER 1 1 KULT OF MK ULTRA 79 CHAPTER 12 BRAVE NEW WORLD ORDER 95 CHAPTER 13 CHANGING IMAGES 107 CHAPTER 1 4 CENTER FOR VIOLENCE 1 1 1 CHAPTER 15 MIND CONTROLLED ASSASSINS 1 17 CHAPTER 16 SO LIKE CANDY 123 CHAPTER 17 MIND CONTROL IMPLANTS 127 CHAPTER 1 8 FUTURE SHOCK & THE JFK HIT 1 39 CHAPTER 19 "RFK MUST DIE" 151 CHAPTER 20 HAPPINESS IS A WARM GUN 157 CHAPTER 21 BOMBED 165 CHAPTER 22 BERSERKERS 169 CHAPTER 23 CREATING CULTS 173 CHAPTER 24 DEATH RAYS 200 CHAPTER 25 IN YOUR HEAD 2 1 1 CHAPTER 26 VICTIMIZED 223 CHAPTER 27 WOODPECKER 239 CHAPTER 28 HAARP 247 CHAPTER 29 HUM JOBS & BALLS OF FIRE 253 CHAPTER 30 LETHAL NON-LETHALS 263 CHAPTER 3 1 ALIENS FROM EARTH 27 1 CHAPTER 32 UNIDENTIFIED FLYING AGENTS 283 CHAPTER 33 MONARCH 293 CHAPTER 34 WORLD BRAIN 301 FINALITY 309 Top: H.G. Wells. Bottom: John Foster Dulles. Introduction: WAR FOR THE MIND Since the beginning of recorded history men have lusted for control of their fellows — the impulse seemingly part of the makeup of the half-ape, half-angel we call human. Until modern times brute force, propaganda, and religion were the most successful methods for the manipulation of human beings, but by the turn of this century coercive methodology had advanced far beyond the sword, the inflammatory slogan, and the stick and carrot of heaven and hell. Now, in the 20th century, scientists in the pay of governments and other monied interests have made technical breakthroughs that render actual mind control feasible, and on a nigh-universal scale. Invasive control techniques have been fine-tuned to the point where the controllers are literally able to get inside our heads and to command us. They are able to tinker with our humanness, to manipulate it, to destroy it if they choose. They are able to use high tech networks of electronic entrainment and broadcasting whose nature has not even been hinted of in the mass media — since the mass media itself is employed in the same manner, for the manipulation of the populace. Even the subject of mind control in the media is mentioned only in the context of science fiction, or is derided as the delusions of the crazy "aluminum foil hat crowd," never mind that those guys might be on to something. Now the powerful in their quest for a totalitarian state are provided with unprecedented access and control of our minds and humanity, to do with as they wilt. The means for the creation of worldwide slavery are in sight, and the implementation of this technology progresses day to day. The signs are all around us. Many suspect that there is an overarching philosophy that has been engineering the crises and chaos of the latter portion of the 20th century, and I believe they are right. There are forces working behind the scenes, working to promote a New World Order not significantly different than the nega-utopian Worldstate described in George Orwell's 1984. If this elite is cold-blooded enough to have calculatedly created war, famine, and designer disease, as many suspect they have, what qualms would discourage them from creating worldwide mind control? This book is meant to portray certain aspects of the history of world mind control, its evolution, and the political currents that have historically dictated its directions. I will not pretend that it is definitive or the last word on the subject, and it is probably not even the last word I will have to say on the topic. The book is, however, intended to offer perspective on the present day that is rarely provided in the controlled mainstream media. I have accessed a wide variety of sources — some mainstream, some controversial — in order to try to get to the secret programs and influences that have long dictated our thinking, our behavior, our welfare. I believe that some, although certainly not all, of those programs and influences have been revealed here, and that this information will assist future researchers in delving into these matters. I have quoted my sources throughout the book, both for the skeptic who disbelieves what I have to say, as well as for the interested reader who would like to research these topics more thoroughly. When I am speculating, as opposed to relying on solid fact, I have tried to make this clear. The truth is startling enough without getting into fantasy. Although the subject matter of this book is for the most part unrelievedly grim, I have not intended to create inertia, to "tell how bad it all is" and to immobilize the readership with fear about the horrible state everything is in. My hope is to do just the opposite: to galvanize the reader into action. I have attempted to provide information that may be helpful for taking control back from those who would dictate our lives, and for that control to be returned to the individual, and I have also provided contact addresses of allied individuals and groups at the back of the book. Ultimately, the American people are like Gulliver, restrained by the Lilliputians' most fragile of threads. It is time for the giant to awaken and to rip off his bonds. I hope the informa-tion in this book helps. Chapter 1 THINGS TO COME It was the first decade after the turn of the century, in the lull before the storm of the first World War, and many who lived then have reflected on what seemed to be a golden, untroubled time. William Howard Taft was inaugurated as 27th president of the United States. Mary Pickford, the first film star, was featured in silent films by D.W. Griffith. Picasso painted his "Harlequin," and Matisse coined the word "Cubism." The first permanent waves were being worn by beauties as they strolled the streets of London. Behind the scenes in the world, in the industrial boardrooms, ornate drawing rooms, and in the offices of government other activities, not quite so idyllic, were afoot. For this was a time of massive, covert consolidation of power by the monied elite, and the activation of long-term plans of control that would affect the world until the present day. This was the time of the creation of the Federal Reserve, the FBI, the institution of the federal income tax in the United States, and, with the League of Nations, the first stirrings towards a global government. Powerful men were obsessed by the idea of increasing their power and in advancing the technology of control to enable them to do so, and they were burning the midnight oil to turn those dreams into reality. It was the time of meetings held to brainstorm the New World Order in groups like the Round Table, the Coefficients Club, the Fabians, and the Skull and Bones society. The New World Order, that term so often bandied about by politicians and conspiracy writers, is the long-term plan to create a one-world oligarchical government on this planet. It is not really in question that such a plan exists — except among those who have not taken the time to study the documentation, or those whose interests dictate that it should be denied. 11 The Round Table/City of London financier focus is one group behind the New World Order — certainly not the benighted lumpens whom they have pretended to champion — and their plans for world control have been carried out by the universities, the bankers, the politicians — wielding in particular a tangle of international intelligence agencies and the psychiatric frontmen who would later be mobilized by such groups as Tavistock and the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). Throughout this century the members of the Open Conspiracy have busied themselves worldwide, spreading the New World Order virus, all in the interest of the domination of the elite. Amazingly enough, the battle plan of the New World Order controllers can be clearly read in the works of a science fiction writer, a man who came up from humble beginnings in Britain to hobnob in his adult life with the movers and shakers of the elite. Herbert George Wells, more than just the latter day Jules Verne that he is presented as in the history books, was head of British Intelligence during World War II, and his mistress was Maura Benckendorff, a woman who has been called "perhaps the Soviet Union's most effective agent-of-influence ever to appear on London's political and intellectual stage." H.G. Wells knew whereof he spoke when extolling the plans of the New World Order. Wells acted as a publicist for the real planners who worked behind the scenes. He was a front man for the Cecil Rhodes Round Table elitist secret society — Rhodes himself an agent for the Rothschilds' banking conglomerate who left his fortune to Lord Rothschild in his third will. The Round Table later branched out to spawn the influential Council on Foreign Relations and other groups perhaps not as powerful, but more well known in our time. Wells was an intimate of the Rothschild-allied Sassoons, who had made their fortune from opium shipping, and he was often seen at Sassoon fetes attended by the likes of Edward VII, George Bernard Shaw, and the young Winston Churchill. Rhodes stated in 1890 in a letter to W.T. Stead, "What an awful thought it is that if we had not lost America, or if even now we could arrange with the present members of the United States Assembly and our House of Commons, the Peace of the world is secure for all eternity. We could well hold your federal parliament five years at Washington and five years at London. The only thing possible to carry this idea out is a secret one (society) gradually absorbing the wealth of the world to be 12 devoted to such an object..." Elsewhere, Rhodes stated it even more plainly. His objective was: "The extension of British rule throughout the worid, the perfecting of a system of emigration from the United Kingdom and of colonization by British subjects of all lands wherein the means of livelihood are attainable by energy, labour and enterprise... and the ultimate recovery of the United States of America as an integral part of the British Empire." Rhodes set out to accomplish this task and, through his own labors and those of his successors, has almost succeeded. [1] It is a matter of high strangeness that within the pages of books written by H.G. Wells in England in the 1920s and 1930s — one of them science fiction — that the actual future battle plans of the controllers jump off the pages with crystal clarity. Here is an unmistakably clear picture of the New World Order, along with a clear statement of its plans. Although H.G. Wells is primarily known for his works of science fiction, such as The Time Machine (1895), The Invisible Man (1898), and War of the Worlds (1898), he also wrote a number of works which overtly propagandized for the overthrow of existing nation-states and the creation of a one-world government. These books include The Open Conspiracy: Blueprints for aWorld Revolution (1928), The New World Order (1940), and The Shape of Things to Come: The Ultimate Revolution (1933). While all of the above books are eye-opening when it comes to understanding the future as foreseen by the controllers, it is Wells' novel The Shape of Things to Come (and the movie he scripted that was based upon it, the title shortened to Things to Come), that provide the best overall view — past, present, and future — of the New World Order. Again: Interestingly, deceptively, the book is presented as a work of science fiction, but within its pages is Wells' best guess of how the New World Order would come to pass, from a 1930s perspective. While primarily a work of propaganda that pushes the one- world worldview of Wells and other internationalists during the first half of this century, the book is particularly revealing in that it also exposes many of the strategies that are to be employed. Wells' introduction to the book is titled, "The Dream Book of Dr. Philip Raven." In a familiar ploy of the science fiction of the time, the book is introduced as the factual work of a Dr. Raven, a deceased friend of Wells, and a member of the Geneva 13 Secretariat coyly described as having "unusual opportunities for forming judgments upon the trend of things." Wells maintained that Raven wrote the book using the curious technique of transcribing during his waking hours a book of future history that he read during his nightly dreams. This is the fictional vehicle by which Wells sounds the clarion call for the New World Order. The dream book purports to be a work of history, written from the perspective of a citizen of a future Utopian world-state. Wells terms the book "a Short History of the World for about the next century and a half and an "Outline of the Future." He commences his reverse history with a reiteration of actual events up to his own time, describing how the evolution of communications and transportation has brought the human race into closer contact than ever before — global village stuff — although he comments that "Distribution, paper supply, and news services had fallen into the hands of powerful groups able and willing to crush out any... inimical schools of public suggestion. They set about stereotyping the public mind." Not surprisingly Wells places the City of London — the international center of banking culture — and its financial credit as responsible for knitting together world economic life over the previous hundred years. With these innovations in commun- ications and finance, but also with the frustrations and wars inherent (so he says) in the existence of independent national states and sovereignties, came about the gradual dawning of the idea of the World-State. Wells muses, "By this time (1919) there was indeed quite a considerable number of intelligent people in the world who had realized the accumulating necessity of a world government, and a still larger multitude... who had apprehended it instinctively and sentimentally, but there was no one yet who had the intellectual vigor to attack in earnest the problem of substituting a world system for the existing governments." He also describes a one-world government as "manifestly the only possible solution of the human problem." Like many another wealthy individual advocating a one-world state for the "common good," Wells did not believe that commoners were capable of running that world-state. He described democracies as exercising "a political fiction of a very extraordinary kind: that every subject... was equally capable of making whatever collective decisions had to be made." And so this New World Order would be run by the few, by those upper- 14 crust and white racialist Englishmen and their anglophilic American associates, the men that Wells saw as being capable of doing so. Referring in the book to the Versailles Peace Conference that followed World War I, Wells points to American President Woodrow Wilson as being "the most susceptible to the intimations of the future... But it is doubtful if at any time he realized that a world pax means a world control of all the vital common interests of mankind." Within a litany of bright ideas leading up to the acceptance of the one-world-state, Wells notes Wilson's abortive League of Nations, precursor to the U.N., but mourns its failures and regrets that the League, where "The World-State had appeared dimly and evasively, as an aspiration, as a remote possibility... had no executive powers, no certain revenues, no army, no police, and practically no authority to do anything at all." Wells warns the builders of the world- state not to make that mistake again. They would not. Wells even indicates the presence of conspiratorial factions involved in the creation of the unified world order during the twentieth century, the sort of men that he cozied up to in real life in London's exclusive clubs. Wells says that, "strange Mystery Men were dimly visible through a fog of baffling evasions and mis-statements, manipulating prices and exchanges. Prominent among these Mystery Men was a certain Mr. Montagu Norman, Governor of the Bank of England from 1920 to 1935." Not surprisingly, this is the same Montagu Norman who was a rabid pre-war partisan of Hitler, and who participated with Hjalmar Schacht, with American intelligence, with Wall Street, and with the Rothschild/Warburg/Schiff banks in the creation of Adolf Hitler and the Third Reich. "Another big obscure financial force in the war and post-war periods," Wells goes on, "was the complex of great private banking ganglia, of which Morgan and Co., with its associated firms, was the most central and most typical." Wells marks the transition from the date of his actual writing of his book, the early 1930s, to his elitist, technocratic vision of the future with a section about the coming war — World War II, that is — and what he sees as its terrible aftermath, titled, "The Days After Tomorrow: The Age of Frustration." H.G. Wells was not the only person during the post- World War I period to see that another devastating world war was nearly inevitable. Wells has World War II beginning in 1940 in Poland, 15 over an imagined slight taken by a Nazi over the actions of a Pole of Jewish origin. He characterizes World War II as it was, as an orgy of world violence, and has the fighting end in 1949 — staying remarkably close to the actual dates of the conflict — only to be followed by another scourge, that of rampant disease, "The Raid of the Germs." Given the present-day climate of AIDS, Ebola, Mad Cow disease, and other resistant viral strains — and the persistent rumors of the military engineering of those same diseases — perhaps Wells' dating in this particular should have been moved forward a few years. In Wells' scenario, years of terrible war and disease result in the near-total disintegration of society. Wells places the final break-up of the nation-states and "America in Liquidation" at 1966, when "the great patchwork of empires and nationalist states, set up during the Age of European Predominance, lost its defining lines, lost its contrasted cultures and its elaborated traditions, and ceased to divide the allegiance and devotion of men of goodwill." Wells was no prophet as regards his timeline, only a science fiction writer privy to the plans of men with an interest in promoting the coming of the dictatorial world-state. His crystal ball is somewhat cloudy on certain details. Obviously his prediction of the destruction of civilization did not come to pass as an immediate result of World War II, although it is easy to see how Wells might not have foreseen the coming nuclear stalemate which brought about the protracted "cold war" between the U.S. and the USSR. Wells places responsibility for the creation of the New World Order in the lap of scientists of the future, the group he dubs the "Technocracy." Citing a fictional future book by an author named DeWindt, he says the New World Order, "sustained by multitude of nuclei on DeWindt's pattern scattered throughout the whole world, very much as the Bolshevik political organization had been sustained by the Communist Party, came into existence and spread its ever-growing network about the planet without an immediate struggle. Its revolutionary nature was understood by few people other than its promoters." Wells dates the formal institution of the Technocracy — the New World Order, by any other name — at the "Second Conference of Basra" in the year 1978. Although his timeline is faulty, the tactics of gradual ideological assimilation that he describes are time-honored and immortalized in the slogan of 16 the Socialist Fabian Society that Wells belonged to: "Proceed slowly," while the thesis-antithesis-synthesis that culminates in the Technocracy is the product of Hegelian thinking. This is the philosophy as well as the method by which the Wellsian vision of the New World Order has come to pass in our own time — come to pass in virtually everything but its formal institution, and in planetary "mopping up" operations. Exactly where did Wells obtain his information of the plans of the elite? It is interesting that Wells is particularly fond of the adjective "illuminating" when describing an idea he particularly likes, in The Shape of Things to Come. He describes President Wilson's one-worldism as "one of the most illuminating events in the early twentieth century." Before a New World Order can be formed, "scattered flashes of understanding had to ignite a steadier illumination." Is this proof of his card-carrying membership in a group linked to the infamous Illuminati secret society, founded by the German Weishaupt, and alleged by many to be the power behind the institution of the New World Order? Hardly. But it would be a mistake to totally dismiss such clues. The Illuminati, the Freemasons, members of the Skull and Bones and related and offshoot groups have been particularly fond of what they term "revelation of method," secret handshakes, in-group references, and cant language to reveal their presence to their cohorts and to befuddle the "profane" masses. There are solid connections between illuminist groups, the Rhodes Roundtable, the Nazis, British intelligence... and, well, Wells. It is not impossible that Wells is doing just this. Another explicit statement of the intentions of the New World Order can be read in Wells' nonfiction book The Open Conspiracy, published in 1928. The specific directives of Wells' proposed Open Conspiracy program, again identical with what has come to be known as the New World Order, were: "1. The complete assertion, practical as well as theoretical, of the provisional nature of existing governments and of our acquiescence in them; "2. The resolve to minimize by all available means the conflicts of these governments, their militant use of individuals and property and their interferences with the establishment of a world economic system; "3. The determination to replace private local or national ownership of at least credit, transport, and staple production by a responsible world directorate serving the common ends of the 17 race; "4. The practical recognition of the necessity for world biological controls, for example, of population and disease; "5. The support of a minimum standard of individual freedom and welfare in the world; "6. The supreme duty of subordinating the personal life to the creation of a world directorate capable of these tasks and to the general advancement of human knowledge, capacity, and power." This is the multiple-pronged New World Order scheme in black and white, and while it sounds pretty good on paper, what it doesn't say is paramount: it is a plan to demolish national boundaries and constitutions, and to consolidate control — total control — in a tiny aristocratic governing body. Gone will be the constitutional safeguards that Americans have come to take for granted — gone will be any safeguards at all, any protections whatsoever for the human cogwheels subject to this vast totalitarian scheme. The New World Order plan would later be furthered by such offshoot groups as the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, the Club of Rome, the Tavistock Institute, and the Bilderbergers, and realized in the form of such institutions as the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund, and the World Bank. None of these groups or their individual members have acted entirely on their own, but instead are an evolving hydra with many heads. Their actions have always been coordinated in a unified manner, and their shared objective has always been total control of the world. [2] NOTES: 1. Knuth; Lockhart, Robin Bruce, Reilly: The First Man, (Penguin Books, New York, 1987); Wilgus, Neal, The Uluminoids. (Sun Publishing Co., Santa Fe, 1978); Sutton, Antony C. America's Secret Establishment. (Billings, Montana: Liberty House Press, 1986); Chaitkin, Anton, "British Psychiatry: From Eugenics to Assassination," EIR (Executive Intelligence Review), October 7, 1994; White, Carol, The New Dark Ages Conspiracy. (New York: New Benjamin Franklin House, 1984); Dobbs, Zygmund, Keynes at Harvard. New York: Probe Research, Inc., 1969; Robertson, Pat, The New World Order. (Dallas, Texas: Word Publishing, 1991) 2. Wells, H.G., The Open Conspiracy: Blueprints for aWorld Revolution. (London, Victor Gollancz, 1928); White; Higham, Charles, Trading With the Enemy. (New York: Dell, 1983; Chaitkin; White) 18 Chapter 2: LODGE BROTHERS AND LITTLE HITLERS While the one-world elitists in England were scheming for control of the planet, and for the suppression and elimination of "the masses" by one means or another, their American brethren — and brethren they were, in a deal reportedly cut in 1897 to apportion the business of the world — were thinking along the same lines. [1] In these early years of the 20th century, British Round Table controllers and — acting at a command level in the U.S. — members of the German-spawned Skull and Bones society, worked in concert with the Rockefellers and others to pour huge sums of money into American and German coffers for the research of psychiatry, psychiatric genetics, eugenics, euthanasia, and other means of controlling and "perfecting" what they conceived of as an otherwise imperfect human race, at least in terms acceptable to the elite. Although it may seem obvious, political and economic imperialism are almost always linked to an imperialism of the mind. In the early 20th century, embryonic studies of biology, eugenics, and the human mind were massively funded to be utilized, not for the overall improvement of the human condition, but for domination of the many by the few, for the "good" of the State. Skull and Bones is the Yale-based American chapter of a German secret society that is in all probability linked to the famous Illuminati, founded on May 1, 1776, by Adam Weishaupt, Professor of Canon Law at the University of Ingolstadt, and referred to internally as "The Order." Samuel Russell was the founder of Russell and Company, that shipped opium from Turkey to China in the 19th century. 19 Numerous of the dominant "Eastern Establishment" families in American affairs to the present day made their fortune in opium shipping. Russell bought out the Perkins Syndicate in 1830, that had previously dominated the American opium shipping market. Among Russell's employees were Warren Delano, Jr. (the grandfather of Franklin Delano Roosevelt), John Cleve Greene (who financed Princeton University), and Joseph Coolidge (his son was the organizer of the United Fruit Company, alleged to be Mafia-associated and involved in drug smuggling, while his grandson was one of the co-founders of the Council on Foreign Relations). The American Skull and Bones group was founded in 1833 at Yale University by Samuel Russell's cousin, General William Huntington Russell, and Alphonso Taft. In 1831-32 Russell studied in Germany, at that time a hotbed of the Hegelian/ Prussian system that declared the jackbooted state as supreme and the individual as merely a cell in the greater organism. While in Germany, Russell apparently was contacted by the Bavarian Illuminati or an offshoot group. Skull and Bones was incorporated in the U.S. in 1856, as the Russell Trust, and like the Illuminati is also known as "The Order." Internal documentation of Skull and Bones places the beginnings of its German predecessor group at about the time that the Illuminati was suppressed by the Bavarian Elector. [2] "The Order [Skull and Bones]," according to historian Antony C. Sutton, "has either set up or penetrated just about every significant research, policy, and opinion-making organization in the United States, in addition to the Church, business, law, government and politics. Not all at the same time, but persistently and consistently enough to dominate the direction of American society. The evolution of American society is not, and has not been for a century, a voluntary development reflecting individual opinion, ideas and decisions at the grass roots. On the contrary, the broad direction has been created artificially and stimulated by The Order." [3] Part of the New World Order plan, reflected in the views of the people who have promoted it, has always been eugenics: the elimination of "useless eaters" and "inferior races" who are seen only as an impediment in the road of the almighty State. Their aim is a new synthesis in which the only solution for what they consider an overpopulated Earth is for massive depopulation programs to be instituted, and for most of the persons left on the planet to subsist in a virtually pre-industrial 20 tribal state. Aborigines, but aborigines with laptop computers. The controllers, naturally, would not be so burdened by hardship, but would serenely float above society like members of Wells' Technocracy, skimming the cream. Eugenics as a subject had been disseminated by the English psychologist Francis Galton, beginning in 1883. Again seeing the State rather than the individual as the supreme measure of man, and taking off from Darwin's theory of natural selection, Galton proposed that, through selective intervention through breeding programs and the suppression of less desirable breeding stock, society might be brought up to an overall higher condition. In 1904 the University College in London established the first chairs in Eugenics and Eugenics in Working Society in London. This led to the creation of the Galton Laboratory for National Eugenics in 1907. The ideas of eugenics, euthanasia, and sterilization for those judged inferior were heartily supported in London, specifically by the "upper crust" of the populace who were eager to do something about the bothersome lower classes. Eugenics philosophy and programs were soon received with approval worldwide, however, including in America. In 1911, when Judge Kenesaw Mountain Landis ordered Standard Oil broken up, John D. Rockefeller, the first American to amass a billion dollars in assets — equivalent to roughly one hundred billion dollars today — responded by starting the Rockefeller Foundation. The at-the-time astronomical sum of $300 million was transferred into the account of the foundation, and administered by trustees who were family members and employees of the family. John D. Rockefeller had, in the 1860s, started on his way in the oil business with a boost of British capital. Rockefeller was soon notorious for using violent methods for increasing his wealth. In The Robber Barons, Matthew Josephson talks about those methods: "Where the Standard Oil company could not carry on its expansion by peaceful means, it was ready with violence; its faithful servants knew even how to apply the modern weapon of dynamite. In Buffalo, the Vacuum Oil Co., one of the 'dummy' creatures of the Standard Oil system, became disturbed one day by the advent of a vigorous competitor who built a sizable refinery and located it favorably upon the waterfront. The offices of Vacuum conducted at first a furtive campaign of intimidation. Then emboldened or more desperate, they approached the chief 21 mechanic of the enemy refinery, holding whispered conferences with him in a rowboat on Lake Erie. He was asked to 'do something.' He was urged to 'go back to Buffalo and construct the machinery so it would bust up... or smash up, to fix the pipes and stills so they cannot make a good oil... And then if you would give them a little scare, they not knowing anything about the business. You know how..." The foreman's reward would be a lifelong annuity, and "in due time a small explosion took place in the independent plant." [4] The Rockefellers also used more sophisticated forms of espionage. John D.'s brother William Rockefeller employed in his business a British intelligence officer named Claude Dansey who, prior to World War I, had been involved in reorganizing the U.S. Army intelligence service. Dansey's protege General Marlborough Churchill, a relative of Winston Churchill, was given the task of organizing and directing the American intelligence services. After the war, Churchill ran the "Black Chamber," an espionage group with stated allegiance to the State Department and the U.S. Army, but with implicit servitude to the New York monied elite. General Churchill was also responsible for creating the Macy Foundation, which would later be a major conduit for the funding of the CIA's MKULTRA mind control research of the 1950s and later. In order to change his image as the most despised blackguard of the era, John D. Rockefeller took on the services of Ivy Lee, the top advertising man of the day. Lee suggested that Rockefeller start giving away large amounts of cash. Lee was still in the employ of the Rockefellers when, in the 1930s, he was given the specific assignment by Standard Oil President Walter C. Teagle and Hermann Schmitz of the German I.G. Farben company to supply intelligence on America's reaction to the Nazis, and to concoct and disseminate pro-German propaganda to the Americans. This was no fluke. Rockefeller holdings, including Standard Oil, were extensively intertwined with those of the Nazis, and contact and commerce — including shipments of oil — continued throughout World War II. [5] Relations with Germany were not so inflamed when Rockefeller monies funded the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatry in Munich, Germany (initially endowed by the Krupp munitions manufacturing family, and James Loeb, brother-in-law of Paul Warburg, the architect of the Federal Reserve in America), to the tune of 11 million marks. The Rockefeller Foundation, in 1925, also provided a grant of $2.5 million to the 22 Institute, and furnished other large grants to the institution throughout the Hitler era. Also funded by the Rockefellers was the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Eugenics, and Human Heredity. These institutions were run by Swiss psychiatrist Ernst Rudin, who was assisted by Otmar Freiherr von Verschuer and Franz J. Kallmann. [6] James Loeb was a relative of the Warburg banking family, key among the elite controllers in London, and a business partner of William Rockefeller. The Rockefellers and the Warburgs had initially bankrolled the pivotal American Harriman family in their enterprises, channeling monies provided by Sir Ernst Cassell, banker to the British royals. The Rockefellers, the Warburgs, and the Harrimans are familiar faces, appearing again and again during the creation of the primary social control mechanisms of this century, including eugenics and psychiatric mind control. These families acted in collusion with the Round Table groups founded by Cecil Rhodes, himself a Freemason and operative of the Rothschild banking family, as well as the Skull and Bones society in America. Although the Rhodes Round Table groups were originally financed primarily by the Rhodes Trust, since 1925 substantial funding has been provided by the Carnegie United Kingdom Trust, whose first president (1902-05) was Bonesman Daniel Coit Gilman — a man key in the subversion of American education — and organizations associated with J.P. Morgan, the Rockefellers, the Whitneys, and the Lazards. Factually, one of the New World Order's early projects was the creation of the Third Reich. Nazism, in fact, differs very little from the New World Order philosophy except in its emphasis on German nationalism. After Hitler's ascent to chancellorship in 1933, sponsored by many of the men who lusted after a New World Order, psychiatric institutes controlled by Ernst Rudin were incorporated into the Nazi machine. Rudin became head of the Racial Hygiene Society, and Rudin and his staff, in the Task Force on Heredity chaired by SS chief Himmler, instituted the German sterilization law, based upon existing American laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia. Far from being an anomaly of the Nazi regime, the horrific eugenics and psychiatric programs instituted in Germany during this time were only a reflection of studies and proposals that 23 were in vogue in Europe and America. It has only recently been revealed that thousands of persons deemed physically or morally unfit continued to be sterilized after World War II — until the middle 1970s — in Sweden, France, Denmark, Finland, and other European countries. Hitler's Reich, however, provided a political climate in which eugenics plans could achieve a particularly ghastly fruition. Otmar Vershuer, assistant to Ernst Rudin and the director of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Eugenics, and Human Heredity in Berlin, was in turn assisted by a name more familiar to us: Josef Mengele. Vershuer procured funds for Mengele's inhuman research programs at Auschwitz. There, many arrivals at the camp filled out questionnaires from the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute, before a wide variety of frankensteinian experimentation was performed on them. Thousands were tortured and murdered, with body parts shipped to the Rockefeller-financed Kaiser Wilhelm Institute. Mengele was captured and identified in an Allied prisoner of war camp in 1945, and although his captors knew the nature of his crimes at Auschwitz, he was released. His organizational senior Vershuer also eluded punishment; he was simply hired by a Rockefeller-funded eugenics organization, the Bureau of Human Heredity in Denmark. Rudin's assistant Kallman testified on Rudin's behalf at de-Nazification proceedings, and both men were later involved in the creation of the American Society of Human Genetics, which later organized the currently high profile and highly subsidized Human Genome project that may turn the description of mankind as sheep into more than a metaphor. In 1936 another player became apparent in the field of psychiatric genetics and mind control experimentation, one hardly whispered of in other exposes of the subject: the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry. The Scottish Rite's loyalties are and have always been with the New World Order vision of one-world government, and the loyalties of at least a certain faction of the men promoting the New World Order have always been to Freemasonry. Glimmerings of the New World Order strategy can in fact be traced back to the days of their predecessor Rosicrucians — not to be confused with the mailorder AMORC currently seen in UFO and psychic magazines — and such early works as Bacon's New Atlantis. In 1936, Dr. Nolan D.C. Lewis, the Scottish Rite's Field Representative of Research on Demential Praecox (incurable 24 insanity), and director of the New York State Psychiatric Institute, was overseeing 14 projects funded by the Supreme Council of the Scottish Rite Northern Supreme Council. At the time of these Freemasonic psychiatric projects, the Duke of Connaught, son of the German Coburg Prince Albert and Queen Victoria, and brother to Nazi sympathizer King Edward VII, was the grand master of the "Mother Grand Lodge" in England. He was also linked to a racialist "shadow government" called the Broederbond that, according to the Philadelphia Inquirer, ruled South Africa until recent times, and was only exposed in the 1990s. Although very little information is available on these Freemasonic psychiatric projects, details on one provide a telling conjunction between the Freemasons and the Nazis. A protege of Nazi eugenics head Ernst Rudin, psychiatrist Franz J. Kallmann, was forced from his job in Germany when he was discovered to be half Jewish. Kallmann's character can be gauged by the fact that he had argued at the International Congress for Population Science in Berlin in 1935 that, not only should schizophrenics be sterilized, but the same mutilation should also be performed on their apparently healthy relatives. Kallmann moved to New York and smoothly transitioned into being the director of research at the New York State Psychiatric Institute, an institution headed by the Freemasons' Dr. Lewis. Kallmann was paid by the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry to study 1,000 schizophrenics to prove that mental illness was inherited genetically. The study was published in the U.S. and in Germany in 1938. The preface to the study thanked the Scottish Rite and Rudin. Kallman's report was used as part of the scientific justification for a program launched by the Nazi's infamous T4 Unit, named after its address, Tiergartenstrasse 4, Berlin. Operatives of T4 were reportedly responsible for murdering over 200,000 mental defectives. [7] NOTES: 1. Knuth, E.C., The Empire of the City. (The Noontide Press, 1983) 2. Sutton, Antony C, America's Secret Establishment. (Billings, Montana: Liberty House Press, 1986); Anonymous, Skull & Bones: The Very Heart of the Shadow Government, May 1996, obtained on the Internet, copy in the author's possession 3. Sutton 4. Knuth; Chaitkin, Anton, "British Psychiatry: From Eugenics to Assassination," EIR, October 7, 1994; Josephson, Matthew, The Robber Barons. Cited in Allen, Gary. The Rockefeller File. (Seal Beach, California: 76 Press, 25 1976) 5. Andrew, Christopher, Secret Service: The Making of the British Intelligence Community. (London, Sceptre Books, 1986); Chaitkin; Allen; Higham, Charles, Trading With the Enemy. (New York: Dell, 1983); Hillel and Henry, Of Pure Blood. (New York: Pocket Books, 1976) 6. Schreiber, Bernard, The Men Behind Hitler; Chaitkin; Weindling, Paul. "The Rockefeller Foundation and German Bio-medical Sciences, 1920- 1940", in Science, Politics and the Public Good: Essays in Honour of Margaret Gowing, (London: McMillan Press, 1988) 7. Chaitkin, Anton, Treason in America. (New York: New Benjamin Franklin House, 1984); Oglesby, Carl, The Yankee and Cowboy War. (New York: Berkley, 1977); Sutton; Chaitkin, Anton, "British Psychiatry: From Eugenics to Assassination"; Santa Monica Outlook, July 24, 1990; Hillel and Henry; Perloff, James, The Shadows of Power. (Appleton, Wisconsin: Western Islands, 1990) Adam Weishaupt, founder of the Bavarian Illuminati in 1776. 26 Chapter 3: TAKING THE "PSYCHE" OUT OF PSYCHOLOGY Among the basic studies consulted by Rockefeller-funded scientists and others interested in social control at the beginning of this century were those of the official Prussian state psychologist Wilhelm Maximilian Wundt, professor of psychology at the University of Heidelberg. It's fascinating that Wundt's grandfather is mentioned in the Illuminati Provincial Report from Utica (Heidelberg) of September 1782, as being the member known as "Raphael." [1] During the period before Wundt's ascendancy in the field, psychology was considered to be, simply enough, the study of the soul or mind (psyche). Wundt was to change all that, defining and propagandizing for the materialistic viewpoint that would disinform the work of successors like Pavlov, Skinner, and Watson. Wundt took a chair in philosophy at the University of Leipzig in 1875, establishing the world's first psychological laboratory, creating the psychological journal Philosophical Studies, and redefining psychology for this century. Wundt stated with characteristic modesty, "The work which I here present to the public is an attempt to mark out a new domain in science." Wundt was to remain at the University of Leipzig until his death in 1920. Wundt's doctrine might be characterized as science meets the Hegelian sturm und drang. One of the primary under- pinnings of the New World Order is that its strategy for world conquest originates in the philosophy of Hegel. Hegel was a professor of philosophy at the University of Berlin, and his works formed the basis for both Marxist dialectical materialism and fascist Statism. 27 Hegel's stated belief was that Man is subordinate to the State, and only finds fulfillment in obedience to the diktats of the State. As he said, "The State is the absolute reality and the individual himself has objective existence, truth and morality only in his capacity as a member of the State." This philosophy can be and has been used for the justification of any number of atrocities committed upon the human race, and provides an unexamined sub-stratum to the philosophies of many politicians today. If only the omelette (the State) is important, what does it matter if we lose a few million eggs (humans) in the process of cooking up the dish? Hegel was the originator of the theory of the "dialectic," the idea that conflict determines history. According to Hegel, a force (thesis) dictates its own opposing force (antithesis). These forces in conflict result in the creation of a third force: a synthesis. Out of this synthesis the process begins again. Marx later revised the theory of the dialectic, insisting that only material events were relevant, and that the dialectic was inherent in matter, thus divorcing the idea from metaphysics, at least to his own satisfaction. From the theory of the dialectic comes the realization that the creation of conflicts can create determined outcomes, or syntheses. Those who promote the New World Order, again and again, are seen to be using the theory of the Hegelian dialectic to bring it about. They are manipulating events, creating conflicts, creating wars, and destroying the lives of untold millions in the bargain. The New World Order is the desired synthesis of the controlling forces operant in the world today. Naturally, the Hegelian system goes completely against the grain of most people, particularly in the West, who view the individual as the true sovereign. Thus the real enemies are not America vs. the Soviets, or the political Left vs. the Right, but those who would manipulate the yin and yang of history. To return to Wundt: Like Marx, he maintained that unless a thing could be scientifically quantified, there was no point in considering it or including it as a factor in scientific investigation. All psychological studies should be based upon physiology: body reactions. Wundt essentially redefined psychological studies as studies of the brain and nervous system, and redefined man as an animal without a soul, thus legitimizing at least for his associates and their employers the treating of man as such. This, no doubt, was a welcome rationalization for the controllers who could now happily slaughter whomever they 28 pleased without fear of ultimate spiritual retribution or accounting. Wundt said, "it truly appears to be a useless waste of energy to keep returning to such aimless discussions about the nature of the psyche, which were in vogue for a while, and practically still are, instead, rather, of applying one's energies where they will produce real results." According to researcher Paolo Lionni, "For Wundt, will was the direct result of the combination of perceived stimuli, not an independent, individual intention as psychology and philosophy had, with some notable exceptions, held up to that time." Wundt's rejection of the intangibles of life, such as soul, mind, and free will, have influenced psychiatry and psychology up to the present day. And now you know why shrinks look so weird and often have nervous tics. They have been taught that they do not have a soul. [2] According to one chronicler of the history of psychology, after Wundt's theories became popular, "Naturally Leipzig became the Mecca of students who wished to study the 'new' psychology — a psychology that was no longer a branch of speculative philosophy, no longer a fragment of the science of physiology, but a novel and daring and exciting attempt to study mental processes by the experimental and quantitive methods common to all science. For the psychology of Leipzig was, in the eighties and nineties, the newest thing under the sun. It was the psychology for bold young radicals who believed that the ways of the mind could be measured and treated experimentally — and who possibly thought of themselves, in their private reflections, as pioneers on the newest frontier of science, pushing its method into reaches of experience that it had never before invaded. At any rate they threw themselves into their tasks with industry and zest. They became trained introspectionists and, adding introspection to the resources of the physiological laboratories, they attempted the minute analysis of sensation and perception. They measured reaction- times, following their problems into numerous and widespread ramifications. They investigated verbal reactions, thus extending their researches into the field of association. They measured the span and the fluctuations of attention and noted some of its more complex features in the 'complication experiment,' a laboratory method patterned after the situation that gave rise to the astronomer's problem of the 'personal equation.' In their studies of feeling and emotion they recorded 29 pulse-rates, breathing rates, and fluctuations in muscular strength, and in the same connection they developed methods of recording systematically and treating statistically the impressions observed by introspection. They also developed the psychophysical methods and in addition made constant use of resources of the physiological laboratory. And throughout all their endeavors they were dominated by the conception of a psychology that should be scientific as opposed to speculative; always they attempted to rely on exact observation, experimentation, and measurement. Finally when they left Leipzig and worked in laboratories of their own — chiefly in American or German universities — most of them retained enough of the Leipzig impress to teach a psychology that, whatever the subsequent development of the individual's thought, bore traces of the system which was recognized at Leipzig as orthodox." [3] The essence of Wundt's research was that man was a machine, albeit a soft one. Wundt also went along with the Hegelian axiom that man was simply a cog in the greater machine of the State. Was it just a coincidence that Wundt and his cohorts, funded by and working with the Prussian military and political establishment, provided the justification for treating humanity as individual pieces of nearly valueless machinery, to be tinkered with or destroyed at will? Wundt, along with other Hegelians, rejected the moral equation in dealing with mankind — thereby putting man in a test tube — and by doing so opened the door to many of the atrocities that followed in this century, including the horrors of mind control. Another mainstay in the arsenal of elitist mind control research was the work of Ivan Petrovich Pavlov, who studied physiology at Leipzig in 1884, five years after Wundt had a laboratory there, and first worked at the St. Petersburg Military Medical Academy in Russia. In 1906 Pavlov cut holes in dogs' cheeks and inserted tubes to measure salivation. A bell was rung just before food was given to the dogs, and after a period of time it was observed that the ringing of the bell alone would increase the rate of the dogs' salivation. The observation that responses could be so precisely conditioned was then brainstormed to apply to the mental processes of humans — and Pavlov's successors, the shrinks and social controllers, have continued ringing their bells, selectively keeping us drooling ever since. [4] Shortly after Pavlov was driving dogs crazy in Russia, John B. Watson at Johns Hopkins University — the Hegel hotbed for the 30 United States — was doing the same thing to humans. Watson, the founder of what is known as the behaviorist school of psychology — but is really only research following in the dark shadow of Wundt — believed that complex forms of behavior could be programmed into humans. He conducted one experiment in which a young boy, "Little Albert," was given a white rat to play with. After the boy became accustomed to the rat, Watson would beat on the floor with a steel bar every time the rat was brought in. The boy was understandably terrified by such lunatic behavior, and eventually reacted with terror every time the rat was given to him, and finally, whenever any small furry animal was around him. Dr. Watson himself drooled over the possibilities of this kind of mechanical conditioning of human beings: "Give me the baby, and I'll make it climb and use its hands in constructing buildings of stone or wood... I'll make it a thief, a gunman or a dope fiend. The possibilities of shaping in any direction are almost endless... Men are built, not born." Watson later became a highly successful advertising executive, although there are no records available of what happened to Little Albert. [5] In the late 1930s, Harvard psychologist Burrhus Frederick (B.F.) Skinner, an unapologetic student of Wundt's theories, and a member of U.S. Army intelligence, fine-tuned the art of human control into what he termed "operant conditioning," becoming a guru to generations of mind shapers that followed. His simple (and quite familiar, by this time) notion was that the reinforcement of a repeated negative stimulus (punishment) or positive stimulus (reward) formed the basis for learned behavior. Skinner's early experiments produced pigeons that could dance, do figure eights, and play table tennis. His experiments did not stop with pigeons. Skinner's most famous invention, aimed at producing a "socialized child," was the environmentally controlled "Skinner box," a crib-sized container into which he put scores of children, including his own. His ultimate aim was not only to control the behavior of isolated persons, but to gain insights into how to control society as a whole. [6] Skinner's most explicit statement of his philosophy, ultimately one of world control, is contained in his book Walden Two. written in 1948. The book describes a perfect communist Utopia run along behaviorist lines. In Walden Two society is run by Frazier, a straw man designed to dramatize Skinner's beliefs about human 31 conditioning. Below Frazier in the pigeon-pecking order are six Planners, who in turn run Managers, who are held responsible for the "controlees" who perform the menial tasks of daily life. Members of the Walden Two society follow a puritanical "Code of Conduct," that applies to virtually every aspect of day-to-day life, including the forbidding of midnight snacks. Education is a subset of "human engineering," and children are turned over to the group by the parents. "Home is no place to raise children," drawls Frazier, his philosophy one that has seemingly been adopted by many current-day shrinks and social workers. The essence of Walden Two is the application of positive and negative reinforcement to create a smoothly running state, free of such unwanted encumbrances as crime and choice. Skinner followed up his vision of Walden Two in 1971, with his vastly hyped nonfiction book Beyond Freedom and Dignity, awarded the honor of being the most important book of the year by the New York Times. "What is needed is more control, not less," Skinner reminded us. [7] It may be revelatory that throughout his life, Skinner was interested in mechanical contraptions, even working for years on a perpetual motion machine. His view of the composition of human beings was no less mechanical — a vision which characterizes the philosophies of most psychiatrists to this day. This atheist/materialistic viewpoint, again, provides a justification for the atrocities which are daily committed in the name of science: How can it be unethical to tinker with, or even destroy a human, if in fact he is really only a machine? With B.F. Skinner, the philosophy of psychosocial control was finely honed. Although many psychologists today insist that the behaviorist's vision of a controlled world is crude and outdated, and that a docile society cannot be engineered by science, they protest too much. The behaviorist doctrine — forecast by Hegel, invented by Wundt, and fostered by a legion of followers in science and education — is firmly in place in the halls of academia and in the offices of population-shaping worldwide, and are being applied at every level of society. The elite could not be happier if the whole world was placed in a Skinner box. 32 NOTES: 1. Sutton, Antony C, America's Secret Establishment, (Liberty House Press, Billings, Montana, 1986); Lionni, Paolo, The Leipzig Connection. (Sheridan, Oregon: Delphian Press, 1988) 2. "Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich." New York: Funk & Wagnalls New Encyclopedia, 1973; Lionni 3. Heidbreder, Edna, Seven Psychologies. (New York: D. Appleton- Century Company, Inc., 1933) 4. Lionni; Bowart, Walter, Operation Mind Control. (New York: Dell Paperback, 1977); "Pavlov, Ivan Petrovich," The Encyclopedia Americana, (New York, Americana Corporation, 1963) 5. Watson, John B., quoted in Bowart; Packard, Vance. The People Shapers. (New York: Little, Brown, 1977) 6. Bowart; Packard; Judge, John, "The Secret Government," Dharma Combat number 10 7. Packard; Skinner, B.F., Walden Two. (New York: Macmillan Company, 1962) Colonel Sir Claude Dansey, spymaster for the Rockefellers. 33 Top: Aldous Huxley. Bottom: John Rawlings Reese, Tavistock controller. Chapter 4: HEY TEACHER, LEAVE THOSE KIDS ALONE! One of the major world arenas in which Hegelian philosophy and the materialistic anti-psychology of Wundt has been applied is that of education. In 1819 in Prussia the first compulsory schooling for children was instituted. According to educator John Taylor Gatto, society in Prussia was divided "into children who will become policy makers; children who will become assistants to policy makers (the engineers, architects, lawyers, and doctors); and the children who will be the vast, massed, used. "Prussia sets up a three-tier school system, in which one half of one percent of the population is taught to think. They go to school called academic Five and a half percent of the population go to Realschulen, where they partially learn to think, but not completely, because Prussia believed their defeat at the hands of Napoleon was caused by people thinking for themselves at times of stress on the battlefield. They were going to see to it that scientifically this couldn't happen. The lowest 94%, (that's some pyramid, right?) went to volkschulen, where they were to learn harmony, obedience, freedom from stressful thinking, how to follow orders. They worked out a system that would in fact guarantee such results. In the volkschulen, it was to divide whole ideas (which really simultaneously participate in math, science, social thinking, language and art) into subjects which hardly had existed before, to divide the subjects further into units; to divide the time into small enough units of time. With enough variations in the course of a day, no one would know what was going on." [1] In the middle of the last century a member of the secret Skull and Bones society, following in the Prussian tradition, set 35 in motion an American educational revolution that has subverted the entire system toward the goals of the New World Order. That man was Daniel Coit Gilman, first president of Johns Hopkins University and of the Carnegie Institution. Gilman studied Hegelian philosophy at the University of Berlin in 1854- 55. Also at the University of Berlin during this time was the earlier mentioned Wilhelm Wundt, who was key in applying Hegelian-styled psychology to the world. Gilman came from a family of Bonesmen and, after he returned from Germany, in 1856 became treasurer of Skull and Bones. Simultaneously, Gilman became assistant librarian at Yale, and was appointed to the position of head librarian two years later. During the same period Skull and Bones covertly took over the administration of Yale University, with the presidency of the school from that period forward turned over to a succession of illuminized Bonesmen. According to The Iconoclast (October 13, 1873), "They have obtained control of Yale. Its business is performed by them. Money paid to the college must pass into their hands, and be subject to their will. No doubt they are worthy men in themselves, but the many whom they looked down upon while in college, cannot so far forget as to give money freely into their hands. Men in Wall Street complain that the college comes straight to them for help, instead of asking each graduate for his share. The reason is found in a remark made by one of Yale's and America's first men: 'Few will give but Bones men, and they care far more for their society than they do for the college.' The Woolsey Fund has but a struggling existence, for kindred reasons... Here, then, appears the true reason for Yale's poverty. She is controlled by a few men who shut themselves off from others, and assume to be their superiors..." Gilman met with Frederick T. Gates, who ran Rockefeller's foundations, and he implored him to set up the Southern Educational Board, merging the Slater and Peabody funds. Gilman called the foundation the General Education Board — signaling his intentions. The organization was later renamed The Rockefeller Foundation. [2] Gilman was the first president of Johns Hopkins University, and he carefully chose for the faculty members from the Skull and Bones and other groups of the Hegelian stripe. Among those was G. Stanley Hall, the first of Wundt's American students 36 to make a mark. Hall's training in Leipzig was paid for by a loan from a member of Scroll & Key, sister society to Skull and Bones at Yale. In Leipzig, Hall immersed himself in Hegelian-inspired psychological studies taught by materialist psychologists like Hartmann, Helmholtz, and his greatest influence, Wundt. Returning to America in 1883, he took over the psychological laboratory at the new Johns Hopkins, and started the American Psychological Association and the American Journal of Psychology. According to Hall, "The psychology I taught was almost entirely experimental and covered for the most part the material that Wundt had set forth in the later and larger edition of Physiological Psychology." [3] In 1889 Hall was chosen as the first president of the newly established Clark University in Worcester, Massachusetts. Hall was the mentor of one of the most influential names in American education of this century: John Dewey. Dewey studied under Hall at Johns Hopkins, moving on to teach at the universities of Michigan and Minnesota. Another major influence upon Dewey was the Hegelian philosopher George Sylvester Morris, who had received his doctorate from the University of Berlin. According to Dewey, echoing the sentiments of his Prussian mentors, "There is no god, and there is no soul. There are no needs for the props of traditional religion. "With dogma and creed excluded, then immutable truth is also dead and buried. "There is no room for fixed, natural law or permanent moral absolutes." [4] Dewey published the first American textbook on Hegelian philosophy as applied to the Wundtian psychological innovations in his book Psychology. In 1895 he joined the faculty at the Rockefeller-funded University of Chicago, heading the philosophy, psychology, and teaching departments, and establishing an education laboratory called the Dewey School, later known as the Laboratory School of the University of Chicago. Dewey followed the Wundtian example in his insistence that education was not the teaching of mental skills such as reading and writing, but in the channeling of raw experiences to the evolving mind of the child; a sort of psychic Skinner's box version of education. The traditional role of the teacher as educator was replaced by the teacher as shrink, socializer, 37 eugenicist and herald of the coming world superstate. Dewey believed that the purpose of public schools was to "take an active part in determining the social order of the future... according as the teachers align themselves with the newer forces making for social control of economic forces." [5] Dewey also remarked that "The school is primarily a social institution. Education being a social process, the school is simply that form of community life in which all those agencies are concentrated that will be most effective in bringing the child to share in the inherited resources of the race, and to use his own powers for social ends. Education, therefore, is a process of living and not a preparation for future living." [6] For Dewey, the issue was always how the child related to the State, rather than how the State related to the child. Another student of Wundt, who was to prove to be perhaps the most successful popularizer of the new psychology that abolished the psyche, was James McKeen Cattell. Cattell was Wundt's assistant in Leipzig in the years 1883-86, receiving his Ph.D. from the grand old man in 1886. Lecturing in Cambridge in 1887, Cattell met and was converted to Social Darwinism by Darwin's cousin, the English psychologist Francis Galton, the man responsible for the popularization at the beginning of this century of the science of eugenics and selective breeding. In 1887 Cattell established at the University of Pennsylvania a psychological laboratory of the Wundtian mold, then moved on in 1891 to head the new psychology department at Columbia University. Cattell was tremendously influential in disseminating the new overtly materialistic psychology, and did so by establishing a host of magazines, including The Psychological Review, Science, Scientific Monthly, and School and Society. He also published reference works including American Men of Science, Leaders in Education, and The Directory of American Scholars, an effective strategy for screwing Wundtian-school psychologists into the mainstream of American thought. Another of Cattell's questionable feats was the abolition of the use of phonics methods for teaching reading. Cattell popularized the "Look-Say" method of teaching reading, a technique that according to some sources had been invented by Thomas Hopkins Gallaudet for teaching the deaf. Although Gallaudet was not a member of Skull and Bones, two of his sons attended Yale and were initiated into the secret society. Following upon the insight of Gallaudet in teaching the deaf, Cattell came to the conclusion that the direct memorization of 38 words would increase literacy if applied to normal students. Experience in subsequent years has not proven this to be the case, obviously, and one byproduct of Cattell's advocacy of the "Look-Say" theory is that as we approach the 21st century millions of American adults cannot read or write at all. The whole story about Gallaudet may in fact be a sanitization of what actually happened. Educator John Taylor Gatto attributes the "Look-Say" method to the Prussian system of schooling, where this system of not-teaching-reading was used essentially to disadvantage all but the privileged class. Gatto says, "So they figured out that by replacing the alphabet system of teaching reading we teach sounds. (The Prussian System was a whole sentence system, rather than a whole word system. You memorize whole sentences.) If they could get the kids and keep them from reading well for the first six and seven years, then it didn't matter after that. They had broken the link between printed information." [7] Possibly the most effective Trojan horse for injecting the Wundtian theory of man-as-machine into the American educational establishment was an individual, James Earl Russell, who studied under and received his doctorate from Wundt in 1894. Russell became dean of the New York College for the Training of Teachers, which he would run for thirty years while heavily weighting its faculty with practitioners of the Wundtian school, at the same time turning it into the largest institution for the training of teachers in the country. Another luminary in the shrink-wrapping of American education was Edward Lee Thorndike, who studied with Wundtians Armstrong and Judd at Wesleyan University, graduat- ing in 1895. Thorndike moved on to Columbia University, where he specialized in studying animals in "puzzle box" mazes, finally finding his niche at Teachers College under Russell. According to Thorndike, teaching was "The art of giving and withholding stimuli with the result of producing or preventing certain responses. In this definition the term stimulus is used widely for any event which influences a person, — for a word spoken to him, a look, a sentence which he reads, the air he breathes, etc. etc. The term response is used for any reaction made by him, — anew thought, a feeling of interest, a bodily act, any mental or bodily condition resulting from the stimulus. The aim of the teacher is to produce desirable and prevent undesirable changes in human beings by producing and preventing certain responses. The means at the disposal of the 39 teacher are the stimuli which can be brought to bear upon the pupil, — the teacher's words, gestures, and appearance, the condition and appliances of the school room, the books to be used, and objects to be seen, and so on through a long list of the things and events which the teacher can control." [8] Thorndike further stated, "Studies of the capacities and interests of young children indicate the advisability of placing little emphasis before the age of six upon either the acquisition of those intellectual resources known as the formal tools — reading, spelling, arithmetic, writing, etc. — or upon abstract intellectual analysis... "Despite rapid progress in the right direction the program of the average elementary school is too narrow and academic in character. Traditionally the elementary school has been primarily devoted to teaching the fundamental subjects, the three R's, and closely related disciplines... Artificial exercises, like drills on phonetics, multiplication tables, and formal writing movements, are used to a wasteful degree. Subjects such as arithmetic, language, and history include content that is intrinsically of little value. Nearly every subject is enlarged unwisely to satisfy the academic ideal of thoroughness. That the typical school overemphasizes instruction in these formal, academic skills as a means of fostering intellectual resources... is a justifiable criticism... Elimination of unessentials by scientific study, then, is one step in improving the curriculum." [9] The emphasis by Thorndike and his fellows on the "socialization" of the student — in fact the subjugation of the student to the social order — as opposed to the teaching of specific skills, is another factor that has led to a general breakdown of literacy in the United States, while at the same time providing no noticeable increase in the ability to socialize — in fact, obviously the contrary. Thorndike believed that, "Education is interested primarily in the general interrelation of man and his environment, in all the changes which make possible a better adjustment of human nature to its surroundings." This is another important aspect of Thorndike' s and all of the other latter-day Wundtians' philosophies. Man is an animal who must adapt to the environment, that is, the social system and political regime, rather than adapting the environment to his own vision. Man is to be conditioned to accept the circumstances that he finds himself in, not learn to change them. Again, the controlling elite have no qualms about 40 changing society or the environment to conform to their own whims — even if it takes 'dozing a rainforest — it is only the rebellious public- schooled who must have the devastating defect of individuality brainwashed out of them. The socialization tech- niques used by the Wundtians create robots, not sociable people. Working out of the Teachers College at Columbia University and the later-established Lincoln School, and dependent upon a steady infusion of Rockefeller money, the major lights in the field of Wundtian psychology, including Thorndike, Cattell, Russell, and Dewey, kick-started "educational" psychology, remaking the face of American schooling. And many of these disciples of Wundt were very straightforward in proclaiming that the purpose of educational psychology was the creation of a New World Order. By the 1950s the Teachers College was indisputably the most powerful force in education in America, with approximately one third of all school presidents and deans, and one fourth of all American teachers accredited there. It must have been reassuring to the Rockefellers and their ilk to see that materialistic psychology and education had won, and was now accepted as the norm in American school systems. NOTES: 1. Gatto, John Taylor, "Origins & History of American Compulsory Schooling," an interview conducted by Jim Martin, Flatland magazine number 11 2. Sutton, Antony C, America's Secret Establishment. (Billings, Montana: Liberty House Press, 1986); Mullins, Eustace, The Curse of Canaan. (Staunton, Virginia: Revelation Books, 1987) 3. Hall, G. Stanley, Cited in Sutton 4. Dewey, John. Cited in Ralph A. Epperson. The New World Order. (Tucson, Arizona: Publius Press, 1990) 5. Lionni; Sutton; Dewey, John. Quoted in Allen, Gary, "Hands off our Children!," American Opinion, volume XVIII, No. 9, October, 1975 6. Dewey, John, My Pedagogic Creed, cited in Sutton 7. Gatto 8. Thorndike, Edward L., The Principles of Teaching Based on Psychology. (New York: A.G Seiler, 1925) 9. Thorndike, Edward L., and Arthur I. Gates, Elementary Principles of Education. (New York: Macmillan, 1929) 41 Top: X-ray photos of brain transmitters. Bottom: Dr. and Mrs. Skinner view daughter Debbie in a "Skinner box." Debbie committed suicide in her 20s. Chapter 5: TAVISTOCK The Tavistock Insitute for Human Relations, known by insiders as the "Freud Hilton," has been a major nexus for the worldwide psychological manipulation that has taken place over the last 50 years. The Tavistock story — at least the public version of it — begins immediately after World War II, when members of British military intelligence created the Institute. In its own literature Tavistock is described as an organization of "dynamic psychiatry" which was intended to practice what they term "societry" on the planet as a whole — and what I term world mind control. British military intelligence itself, in the persons of many of its chief players, has been aimed at a one-world government since its inception. British Secret Service directors on an almost one-for-one basis have been advocates of Fabian socialism. [1] It is alleged that Tavistock was set up much earlier than its announced inception, over 20 years prior in 1921, by Major John Rawlings Reese, on the orders of the Round Table's Royal Institute of International Affairs (also known as Chatham House). The RIIA, along with the American Council on Foreign Relations, had been founded in 1919 during the Versailles Peace Conference, both being early New World Order executive arms. Reese was the man who dreamed of "building a society in which it is possible for any member of any social group to be treated [psychiatrically], without resort to legal means, and even if they do not desire such treatment." At the end of World War II, Reese called for the creation of "psychological shock troops" who would fan out from the Tavistock Institute to engineer the future direction of society. [2] In 1932 Tavistock was put under the directorship of the German psychologist Kurt Lewin. Lewin was a founder of the National Training Laboratories and director of the Harvard 43 Psychological Clinic, and — an odd qualification for a psychiatrist, I think — one of the key players in the original creation of the OSS in America. Lewin is credited with much of the original Tavistock research into mass brainwashing, applying the results of repeated trauma and torture in mind control to society at large. If terror can be induced on a widespread basis into a society, Lewin has stated, then society reverts to a tabula rasa, a blank slate, a situation where control can easily be instituted from an exterior point. Put it another way: By the creation of controlled chaos, the populace can be brought to the point where it willingly submits to greater control. Lewin maintained that society must be driven into a state equivalent to an "early childhood situation." He termed this societal chaos "fluidity." Tavistock's focus in the early days was on strategic warfare studies, in particular of Germany, with emphasis on the re- education of that errant New World Order colony. During World War II many of the Institute's members, including its founder, Reese, ran the British Psychological Warfare Directorate and subsidiary organizations based in the United States. After World War II Tavistock can functionally be considered to have become a part of Britain's Psychological Warfare Bureau, now working on projects dealing with the brainwashing of populations. [3] Tavistock is governed by what it calls an invisible college, echoing antique occultist terminology and reminding one that British intelligence was founded by Freemasons and remains deeply Freemasonic to this day. The original use of the term "invisible college," prior to the announced creation of Tavistock, was Reese's reference to an informal association he had created of all the psychiatrists then working in the British military. For funding, the Tavistock Institute relies on large grants from anonymous benefactors — with no doubt a substantial portion coming directly from the Crown — along with grants from the Rockefeller Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the Carnegie Institute, the World Health Organization, and the British Home Office. Tavistock is also interlinked worldwide with a vast network of other organizations and think tanks, including UNESCO, WHO, the World Federation for Mental Health, and the Rand Corporation. Tavistock is simply a front group for the psychological imposition of the New World Order on the planet, and its main philosophic tool is the Hegelian dialectic framed in the terms of Lewin. 44 The Rockefellers have always been prominent in deciding the course of Tavistock. According to the official chronicler of the group, "The Rockefeller Foundation, before making us a grant, would need to be satisfied, not only by our policies... but also with the persons to carry them out." [4] In a Tavistock-funded profile of the group, it is stated that the role of the institute has been: "(a) The invention of the command psychiatrist as a medical- social role carrying out reconnaissance in a large structure and defined group, leading to the ascertainment and recognition of critical problems in the sphere of human relations and management. "(b) The invention of social psychiatry as a policy science permitting preventative technical intervention in large-scale problems... "(c) The fashioning of a whole series of military institutions which concretely and effectively implemented the policies advocated. "(d) The invention of new types of therapeutic communities. "(e) The invention of cultural psychiatry... "Capability nurtured in the Tavistock for the psychiatrist to work with lay personnel — in this case the military — in a collaborative partnership. In other words, the strategy of command psychiatry and the developments to which it led were psycho-dynamically conceived and based." Tavistock, born from the collaboration of the international monied elite, military intelligence, and the materialistic psychiatric community, refers to its self-admitted "military" orientation as Operation Phoenix — again, a Freemasonic symbol that it shares with the infamous Vietnam War assassination program. One is reminded of the Freemasonic legend " Ordo Ab Chao," Order Out of Chaos, which could just as easily describe the Tavistock method of destroying a target subject, or a target population, prior to reprogramming; the Tavistock modus operandi. Throughout the Tavistock literature — either official or Tavistock-inspired — they reiterate their "global vision" and make it clear that the institute is intended to work its long-term "societry" on the world regardless of the wishes of individuals who inhabit it. One of the most successful of Tavistock-offshoot organizations is what was originally known as the National Training 45 Laboratories (NTL), and now the NTL Institute for Applied Behavioral Sciences, founded in 1947. Located in Bethel, Maine, the mission of the NTL is to give Lewin-inspired "group dynamics" sessions to American leaders. Again, during group sessions "dissonance" or stress is introduced to destroy the individual's previous beliefs, and then a new, group-oriented personality is coaxed forth. This is the primary technical method used by a myriad of Tavistock-influenced "sensitivity" groups like Alanon and Esalen. Since the 1950s, NTL has processed the majority of America's corporate leaders in its programs, while simultaneously running the same programs for various segments of the government, including the Navy, the Department of Education, and the State Department. None dare call it mind control. [5] Eric Trist, the chairman of Tavistock's governors, in 1963 described his and Tavistock's work on mass brainwashing, delineating in detail his theory of "social turbulence," based upon the theories of Hegel, although again, Trist is far more quick to cite Lewin. Trist postulated that the administering of a series of traumatizing shocks upon a society would destabilize it, lowering the overall character of the society's reasoning. Trist suggested that by late 1963 the world had moved into a condition of "permanent social turbulence" that would serve to usher in a new condition of society, a new paradigm, and a new possibility for remaking the face of the planet. The nature of the permanent social turbulence that Trist foresaw is further defined in a book published in 1975 by one of Trist's associates, Fred Emery. The book, Futures We Are In, likens the condition of current day society to the violent punk welfare state of Anthony Burgess' novel, A Clockwork Orange, written in the 1960s. Emery, in reflection of Trist, also trumpets Hegel. He describes the first stage of the breakdown of society as being "superficiality," in which previous societal values are questioned and discarded. He uses as an example of this the death of the Judeo-Christian paradigm. The next inevitable state is "segmentation," in which societal institutions break down, resulting in a reversion to paranoid groups of individuals hostile to each other. The next stage in the breakdown of society would be the launching of a fascist movement akin to the Nazis. 46 The final and most disrupted state of society is termed disassociation, in which the individual becomes the entirety of society for himself, and is isolated from other members of the group. The dominant culture of the society becomes "fantasy and superstition." According to Trist, the current "wired society" where the main interaction of the individual is with electronic media is only a metaphor for disassociation. Cyberpunks, New Agers, and couch potatoes, take note. It is interesting to note that the same progression can be seen in the microcosm with the induction of the multiple personality, an oft-asserted goal of intelligence agency brain-banging. In May 1967 at Queen Elizabeth's palatial estate in Deauville, France, a conference was convened. It was intended to update participants on ongoing projects of the Tavistock network. This was the "Conference on Transatlantic Technological Imbalance and Collaboration," sponsored by the Scientific and Technological Committee of the North Atlantic Assembly and the Foreign Policy Research Institute. Among the projects mentioned at the conference were the collaboration of Emery and Trist on "social turbulence," and the SRI-Tavistock "Images of Man" project. Participants in the conference included Tavistock's Harland Cleveland; Willis Harman of the Tavistock offshoot Stanford Research Institute; Dr. Zbigniew Brzezinski, the future Carter national security advisor and the Trilateral Commission's founding executive director; and Fred Emery, who had earlier delineated the stages of societal disintegration in his Futures We Are In. Other participants were Dr. Aurelio Peccei, later to head the zero-growth fixated Club of Rome, then chairman of the Economic Committee of the Atlantic Institute, an important NATO think tank; and Sir Alexander King and Sir Solly Zuckerman, advisors to the British crown. Fleshing out the hologram of elitist New World Order planning is the information that Brzezinski is believed by many in Western intelligence organizations to be a KGB mole, recruited by British Round Tabler and Rothschild-Warburg agent William Yandell Elliot. Henry Kissinger is also linked to this group, reportedly after being recruited to a KGB homosexual blackmail ring focused on the EICOM G-2 headquarters in Oberammergau, Germany, at the end of the second world war. Kissinger was a member of the U.S. Army 970th Counterintelligence Corps, involved in creating the Nazi "rat lines" that enabled many prominent Nazis to escape prosecution 47 at the end of World War II. Kissinger's reported mentor was Fritz Kraemer of the Pentagon plans division, who also groomed Alexander Haig. Kraemer' s secret life during WWII, according to deceased conspiracy researcher Mae Brussel, was that of a special lieutenant to Hitler. What does it matter whose side you are on, the controllers might say? Both sides in the World War, or for that matter the Cold War, only served to foster the synthesis of the New World Order. [6] The principles that were agreed on at the Tavistock conference will sound very familiar to those who have been following the reshaping of human institutions and values by the New World Order. These include the belief that man should not dominate nature, but instead become a part of it, with no more rights and privileges than, say, the purple-assed baboon in the wild. Governments are obsolete and will be replaced by other, more encompassing institutions. Mankind is moving into a de- industrialized post-technological society, an "information age," the Age of Aquarius; again, aborigines with laptop computers. The primary impetus towards the evolution to the post- technological society are the repeated shocks and chaos taking place, including such events as the Kennedy assassination, the Vietnam War, and the assault on traditional institutions and thinking by the psychedelic counterculture. This philosophy was described exactly by Dr. William Sargent of the Tavistock Institute in 1957 in his book Battle for the Mind — A Physiology of Conversion and Brain-Washing. Again, the idea is that the micro reflects the macro: the occultist dictum, "As above, so below." Sargent said, "Various types of beliefs can be implanted in many people after brain function has been sufficiently disturbed by accidentally or deliberately induced fear, anger, or excitement. Of the results caused by such disturbances, the most common one is temporarily impaired judgment and heightened suggestibility. Its various group manifestations are sometimes classed under the heading of 'herd instinct,' and appear most spectacularly in wartime, during severe epidemics, and in all similar periods of common danger, which increase anxiety and so individual and mass suggestibility." Out of the Tavistock conference also came Zbigniew Brzezinski's 1968 book The Technotronic Age, that posits an information society whose basis of competition is replaced by "amusement focus" based on "spectator spectacles (mass sports 48 and TV) providing an opiate for increasingly purposeless masses... New forms of social control may be needed to limit the indiscriminate exercise by the individual of their new powers. The possibility of extensive chemical mind control... will call for a social definition of the common criteria of restraint as well as utilization." And some think that Guy DeBord's Society of the Spectacle isn't literal. In the Technotronic Age, the "nation state as a fundamental unit of man's organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force: International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation- state." Brzezinski also says of the "Technotronic Age" that, "At the same time the capacity to assert social and political control over the individual will vastly increase. It will soon be possible to assert almost continuous control over every citizen and to maintain up-to-date files, containing even the most personal details about health and personal behavior of every citizen in addition to the more customary data. "These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities. Power will gravitate into the hands of those who control information. Our existing institutions will be supplanted by pre-crisis management institutions, the task of which will be to identify in advance likely social crises and to develop programs to cope with them. "This will encourage tendencies through the next several decades toward a Technotronic Era, a dictatorship leaving even less room for political procedures as we know them. Finally, looking ahead to the end of the century, the possibility of biochemical mind control and genetic tinkering with man, including beings which will function like men and reason like them as well, could give rise to some difficult questions." A book written at the same time by the conference chairman, Aurellio Peccei, was titled The Chasm Ahead, and it too echoed the prevailing elitist themes: Peccei reiterated that a one-world government was the only solution to the problems of the world. Also required was that Russia and the U.S. would have to enter into partnership in global planning and enforcement — a theme that has become increasingly obvious in recent years with the Spetznaz setting up shop in Peoria and Tulsa, and Clinton trying to lease the Long Beach Naval Yards to the mainland Chinese. [7] One of the footsoldiers of Tavistock — currently fallen from grace at least in the eyes of the American people — is, believe it 49 or not, Newt Gingrich. The truth about Newt exists much in contradiction to his image as a staunch upholder of Republican ideals and conservative family values. Gingrich is in fact another Trojan horse whose mentor is the "futurist" Alvin Toffler. Toffler's book The Third Wave describes the current technocratic takeover of the world, the acquisition of virtually all wealth by a tiny elite, and the relegation of the vast majority of the populace to a Third World foraging in the garbage heaps of the rich. According to Gingrich, speaking to a crowd of yuppies at a congress on "Democracy in Virtual America," "In the mid-to- late-'60s, I read Drucker's The Age of Discontinuities, Boulding's The Meaning of the Twentieth Century, Bell's Beyond Post-Industrial Society — all of which were precursors to the first popularizer of this notion, which was Future Shock, which was written basically a quarter of a century ago. Now, those four books described everything we're living through for all practical purposes... and nothing has changed for a quarter of a century... I've worked with the Tofflers for 20 years in trying to figure out this interesting question. Since this is all intellectually obvious, why can't we break through?" Toffler is a protege of Kenneth Boulding, who is one of Tavistock's leading lights in the United States, and according to his wife founded the revolutionary Students for a Democratic Society (SDS). Boulding and his wife were responsible for much bridge building between the Fabian "societrists" of Tavistock and the New Left in the 1960s. Gingrich revealed his not-so-hidden roots when he mentioned the "anticipatory democracy" project in his introduction to The Third Wave. "A/D," as it is termed, was a project fielded by Tavistock in the 1960s intended to bring about a New Age shift toward anything but traditional values, unless it is the Wellsian "Open Conspiracy" traditional values of the elite controllers. Among the later projects that would be created by participants in the "A/D" project would be the Malthusian Club of Rome and the Carter administration's Global 2000 plan. Gingrich was ushered into the Tavistock orbit in 1965 when, as an undergraduate at Emory University, a professor at Georgia Tech introduced him to the work of Boulding and Toffler. After getting his Ph.D. at Tulane, Gingrich took a teaching job at West Georgia State College, outside Atlanta, the East Coast node of the "humanist psychology movement." One of Gingrich's closest 50 associates was the anything-but-Republican Jimmy Carter, who put Newt in charge of an A/D pilot project called Goals for Georgia. It was only later that Gingrich got his calling as a banner-waver for the New Right. [8] NOTES: 1. Dicks, Henry Victor, Fifty Years of the Tavistock Clinic. (London, England: Routledge & K. Paul, 1970); Douglas and Thompson, "New attempt to cover up the English side of the Bolshevik's Trust', EIR, June5, 1987; Wolfe, L., "The Tavistock roots of the 'Aquarian Conspiracy', EIR, January 12, 1996 2. Dicks; Zepp-LaRouche, Helga, The Hitler Book. (New York: The Schiller Institute, 1984); Wolfe 3. Dr. John Coleman, Conspirator's Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300. (America West Publishers, Carson City, Nevada, 1992); Zepp- LaRouche; Dicks 4. Dicks 5. Dicks; Wolfe 6. John Judge, "Nazis in the White House: The Reagan Administration & the Fascist International, Overthrow, Fall 1985, and "Good Americans", Dharma Combat number 1 1 7. Coleman; Sutton and Wood, Trilateral Over Washington. (Scottsdale, Arizona: The August Corporation, 1978) 8. Anticipatory Democracy — People in the Politics of the Future, Clement Bezold, ed. (New York: Random House, 1978); Steinberg, Jeffrey, "Anticipatory democracy," EIR, January 12, 1996 m nPFRATION CONTROL "A magnificent book... moial7signiftcantaftd onlotgettaMer Walter Bowart's controversial 1978 book. 51 THE NEW YORK TIMES, MONDAY RADIO 'MATADOR' STOPSWIREDBULL Continued From Page 1, CoL S our understanding of the mind." "We are in a precarious race," he said, "between the acquisi- tion of many megatons of de- structive power and the devel- opment of intelligent human be- ings who win make Intelligent use of the formidable forces at our disposal." Based on Hi* Experiment* Dr. Delgado's contention that brain research has reached a stage ot refinement where it can contribute to the solution e«f some of these problems is based he said, on many of his own ex- periments. These have shown, he ex* plained, that "functions tradi- tionally related to the psyche, such as friendliness, pleasure or verbal expression, can be In- duced, modified and inhibited by direct electrical stimulation of thebrain." For example, he has been able to "play" monkeys and eats 'Jlfke little electronic toys" that yawn, hide, fight, play, mate and go to sleep on command. And with humans under treat- ment for epilepsy, he has in- creased word output sixfold in one person, has produced severe ;&nxlety in another, and in sev- eral others has induced feeling* Tn« New Yarfc Tim*$ STUDYING BEHAVIOR: Dr. lose M. E. Delgado is his office at Yale Unl- versify School of Medicine. Switzerland used a similar set- up to stimulate various cerebral regions in conscif m * cat« u *. showed that elect| could Influence posture, balance, i such basic psych tions as fear and ; For some stil ! reason, those tec those films a of all the an the behavior This permits tlve assessmen social interact quantification havtoral profi said. This is portant when modifications i of the group t stimulation of sponse in one animals. For exampl< several specif! brain can Indu In a mortkor. 1 tive u&ta on < fcavlor, as we others in the > more precisely of various, s effects of ei tion on Individ social bchavtoi Swmi of the; With such Delgado has : <IMo«keys w a button that to the brain I member of calms It down animals can b trol one aas «IA monltey, Top: 1965 New York Times article on Delgado. Right: Delgado in 1995. The humanist magazine Free En- quiry described him as "one of the most noted researchers on the brain." Top: Jose Delgado of Yale University's School of Medicine faces a charging bull... Bottom: ...and stops it cold, using a "stimoceiver," which sent a radio signal to its brain through an implant. These photographs appeared on the front pages of newspapers around the world, including the New York Times (May 17, 1965). Above: Two photos of Delgado's mind control implants. Chapter 6: SHOCKTROOPS In 1944, while World War II still raged, Lord Montagu Norman resigned from his position at the Bank of England. Norman, a man prone to repeated mental problems and hospitalizations, and who had been a staunch supporter of Hitler prior to the war, announced the beginning of the British National Association for Mental Health, which was in fact only a renaming of the National Councils of Mental Hygiene, a group that had been heavily involved in pushing eugenics programs prior to the war. With Hitler's downfall, eugenics had an extremely unsavory odor that needed to be deodorized with a name change. Certainly eugenics never vanished, as witness, for example, the thousands of women involuntarily sterilized in Sweden and other European countries until the mid-1970s. The NAMH functioned as a Tavistock-front organization which would soon become the controlling body for world psychiatry. [1] An examination of the officers of NAMH provides clues as to its direction: Richard Austen Butler, the pro-Nazi deputy foreign minister to Lord Halifax, became president. Lord Halifax's son- in-law, the Earl of Feversham, became chairman. Vice chairman was Norman's wife, Priscilla Reyntiens Worsthorne Norman, a vocal proponent of eugenics programs and the Nazis, who had assisted German rearmament by releasing 6,000,000 British pounds in Czech gold to the Germans after the occupation of Czechoslovakia. Otto Niemeyer, Norman's assistant at the Bank of England, became treasurer of the organization. Perhaps the group should have been titled the Nazi Association for Mental Health? In 1948 an International Congress on Mental Health at the Ministry of Health in London was convened by Norman. The Congress was hosted by the British National Association, whose patron was the Duchess of Kent, widow of the Grand Master of Masons and mother of the Grand Master of Masons to follow. A World Federation for Mental Health was formed at the Congress, 55 with Brigadier General Dr. John Rawlings Rees, head of the British psychological warfare department and of the Tavistock Institute, named president. Co-director of the World Federation was Dr. Frank Fremont-Smith, chief medical officer of the Rockefeller- spawned Josiah Macy Foundation that would later be the primary funnel for CIA MKULTRA mind control funding. According to Nina Ridenour, technical coordinator of the U.S. delegation to the Congress, "The World Federation for Mental Health... had been created upon the recommendation of the United Nations' World Health Organization and UNESCO because they needed a non-governmental mental health organization with which they could cooperate." The vice presidents of the Congress, again, provide a sense of its direction: Dr. Hugh Chrichton-Miller was a founder of Tavistock, and vice-pr