Originally Posted by ExtraCheese Originally Posted by

Thanks for the info rhcoaster!

The link says the base of the conflict is art. 18:1332, some googling taught me this is Diversity; breach of contract (where diversity means there are two parties in the conflict).



This show there is really a legal issue between Atari and Pipeworks, so it could mean that Pipeworks didn't voluntarily quit the project. It could also mean that Atari didn't respected the contract and failed to pay Pipeworks... Questions questions questions which Atari will never answer, as they are afraid of 'damage to the company name'. Well, it can't do any more damage after the horrible teaser gameplay video. Fans were disgusted and others were laughing at Atari ("omg, I can't believe Atari has sunk so low").



Maybe it's time for Atari to quit fooling around and show us some respect by actually telling us what is going on. Quit the marketing talk and just tell us you guys ****ed up big time with whatever you guys did with Pipeworks and hiring a basically non-existent game developer called... uhm, what is the name again? *googles for biggest failing developer*, oh yeah right it's area 52.