According to Rashid, Google not only kept some malls and stores in the dark, but told contractors not to identify themselves to store staff even though they were carrying equipment like laptops and backpacks. The company reportedly ignored requests to obtain a badge, too. This led to multiple incidents where security would follow him around, pull him aside or even ask if he was a terrorist.

Google apparently settled the claim for £4,000 (about $5,130), but didn't admit wrongdoing in the process.

The company has also partly challenged Rashid's claims in a statement to The Guardian. It maintained that people in his role are "instructed to be forthright" about working for Google when asked, rather than keeping quiet. It also justified some of its approach by saying it didn't need permission to collect publicly available WiFi data. It didn't address other points, however, such as the reasons for dropping the contract offer or supposedly ignoring ID requests.

To Rashid, Google also hasn't really addressed the central concern: that the firm doesn't appear to be aware of or responsive to potential racial discrimination issues for contractors. Google didn't stop to think that contractors might face unfair targeting based on their appearance, Rashid argued. And if he's accurate, this kind of problem might persist until there are reforms.