Aemilius







Joined: 14 Mar 2015

Posts: 43

Joined: 14 Mar 2015Posts: 43



Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2015 8:58 am Post subject: WTC7.... the Final Verdict is in on 9/11 WTC7 - ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION



A complete Empirically Verifiable Scientific Method Driven Graphical Target System

Analysis and Conclusion arrived at by Process of Elimination.



The conditions required for gravitational acceleration

to occur have been known for centuries....



The condition under which a body is, literally, free

to fall under the influence of the local gravitational field

with no resistance to its acceleration....



The control that appears on the right in many of the

animations is intended as a reminder of that, and also

signals the beginning of a comparison....



We can still know with certainty what conditions exist

beneath an object as it falls....



....even though we may not be able to see into the

space beneath it as it does....



Buckled columns, whether one or a hundred, whether one

at a time or all at once (or any combination thereof) won't just go

from 100% to 0% when they buckle, they'll steadily

decrease in strength while they buckle and that takes time ....



The mechanism of buckling, a mode of natural progressive

structural failure, whether caused by heat....



....by overloading....



....or even other modes of natural progressive structural failure

such as impact induced fracturing....



....or fracturing due to overloading....



.... absolutely can not match or create the conditions required for gravitational

acceleration to occur, it's literally impossible. There is no such

thing as structural gravitational acceleration ....



Some force must be introduced to quickly remove all support from

beneath the literally falling visible upper part of the building seen

in the video. The claimed progressive collapse of the building

(NIST probable collapse sequence starting with column 79 on the left)....



....that essentially happens all at once ....



....is clearly physically inconsistent with what we empirically

know of natural progressive structural failure (defined as a time

consuming process of individual/sequential/simultaneous failure

involving one or a number of related structural components). It's

a physical impossibility for the lower part of the

asymmetrically damaged building (reportedly three core

columns and nine perimeter columns)....



....to have naturally progressively collapsed in any way that

could result in the upper part of the building symmetrically

descending straight down through itself (NIST probable collapse

sequence starting with column 79 circled below) at anything

near gravitational acceleration for any period of time....



Any building collapse like that seen playing out below (as

seen from the South) resulting from a natural progressive structural

failure of a steel frame building including a 105 foot 2.25 second

period of gravitational acceleration is an absolute physical impossibility....



....and there is absolutely no mode or combination of modes of

natural progressive structural failure driven solely by gravity that

can ever give rise to the conditions required for free fall to have

occurred at any point during it's descent....



The scenario playing out below is an absolute physical impossibility.

Just as there is no such thing as structural gravitational acceleration , nor is there any

failure mode known as natural progressive structural gravitational acceleration ....



There is simply no point during a natural progressive gravity driven

collapse of any steel frame skyscraper where one could say....

"Hold it.... right there! That's the point where all the steel columns

and structural components that were supporting the building just a

moment ago (with an area greater than that of a football field )

will undoubtedly be found to be behaving in a manner very much like

air (below left). It will take very careful calculation to tell the fall

times apart during this free fall period of the ongoing natural

progressive structural failure (below right)"....



For the 2.25 seconds (eight stories, approximately 105 feet) that we

know the upper part of the building literally fell at gravitational

acceleration it cannot have been using any of it's potential

energy to crush the building contents, columns and other structural

components beneath it and undergo free fall at the same time (as

illustrated by this frangible impedance scenario)....



It's physically impossible for the lower asymmetrically

damaged part of the building to have naturally progressively collapsed

in a way that could result in the upper part of the building actually

accelerating as it descended symmetrically straight down through

itself, through the path of maximum resistance (below right), and then,

driven on solely by gravity, actually continue to accelerate so

nearly to gravitational acceleration (below left) as to require very

careful calculation for any difference between the two to be detected....



Some other force powerful enough to quickly remove all support

from beneath the upper part of the building as it descended must

be introduced to explain the observed rate of descent during the 2.25

second period of gravitational acceleration. For the 2.25 seconds that the

building literally fell at gravitational acceleration, no other force

powerful enough to quickly remove all support from beneath the

upper part of the building was seen to be introduced from outside

the building, and no other force powerful enough to quickly remove

all support from beneath the upper part of the building is known

to have existed inside the building as an element or normal

function of it's infrastructure. For a load supported by a column to

descend at gravitational acceleration, all support must be quickly

removed, there's absolutely no other way. It must be knocked

out, pulled out, blown out, vaporized etc. Since no eight story tall

boulders were seen rumbling through Manhatten that day that could have

quickly knocked out all support....



....and no suspicious looking Frenchmen were spotted rigging for verinage

(a form of controlled demolition) the night before that could have

quickly pulled out all support....



....and no bombs or rockets were seen to be dropped on/fired at it that

could have quickly blown out all support....



....and no giant laser beams or other secret weapons were being tested in

the area that could have quickly vaporized all support....



....and no other force capable of quickly removing all support from

beneath the upper part of the building existed in the building as a

normal function of it's infrastructure (blue)....



....it naturally follows that whatever the other force was that

must be introduced to explain the observed 2.25 seconds of descent

at gravitional acceleration, it must have been introduced some

time before the event, and unless someone can show how the

other force that must be introduced either during or just

before the collapse of the building was introduced from outside

the building, or that it was already existing inside the building as

a normal function of it's infrastructure, the process of elimination really

leaves only one possible explanation for the building's behaviour.

Some energetic material powerful enough to quickly remove all support

from beneath the upper part of the building during the 2.25 second period

of gravitational acceleration must have been physically transported

inside the building some time before the event, it had

to be brought in. The explosion model is the only one....



....that can realistically match and empirically be expected to

create the conditions that we know must have existed....



....beneath the literally falling visible upper part of the building

during its observed largely symmetrical descent at gravitational

acceleration for approximately 105 feet in 2.25 seconds....



The undisputed (both the NIST and independent researchers alike agree)

observation of a significant well defined period of gravitational acceleration....



Stage 1 (0 to 1.75 seconds): acceleration less than that of gravity (i.e., slower than free fall)



Stage 2 (1.75 to 4.0 seconds): gravitational acceleration (free fall)

NIST - "During Stage 2, the north face descended essentially (displaying all the absolutely

necessary, extremely important features) in free fall (free descent of a body in which the gravitational force

is the only force acting on it), indicating negligible (so small or unimportant as to be not worth

considering, insignificant) support from the structure below."



Stage 3 (4.0 to 5.4 seconds): decreased acceleration, again less than that of gravity



....means that an explosion, or a number of explosions, must have

occurred that was powerful enough to quickly remove all support

from beneath the upper part of the building (below right), either all at

once or incrementally in advance of its descent, permitting it to descend

at gravitational acceleration for the observed period and under the

conditions required (below left) for free fall to occur....



The empirically established fact that WTC7 was brought down by

explosives immediately shines a bright spotlight on literally the only

ones who could possibly have carried out a covert domestic operation

of this magnitude (all the events of that day).... the only ones who

had exclusive 24/7 access to the highly secured building (WTC7).... the

only ones who were in complete control of the security system for

the building.... the only ones who had ready access to the quantity

and quality of energetic materials required.... and the only ones

who had the required expertise in the effective use of said energetic

materials. The fact is that only the Department of Defense/Central

Intelligence Agency could've done it. And just as one needn't be Isaac

Newton to see there is no other possible explanation for the behavior of

WTC7 other than energetic materials having been physically transported

inside the building, one needn't be Sherlock Holmes to see there is no

other possible explanation as to who could have done it since the building

was in perpetual lock down for many years as a highly secured

government facility.... it's elementary. The conditions required for gravitational accelerationto occur have been known for centuries....The condition under which a body is, literally, freeto fall under the influence of the local gravitational fieldwith no resistance to its acceleration....The control that appears on the right in many of theanimations is intended as a reminder of that, and alsosignals the beginning of a comparison....We can still know with certainty what conditions existbeneath an object as it falls........even though we may not be able to see into thespace beneath it as it does....Buckled columns, whether one or a hundred, whether oneat a time or all at once (or any combination thereof) won't just gofrom 100% to 0%they buckle, they'll steadilydecrease in strengththey buckle and that takes....The mechanism of buckling, a mode of natural progressivestructural failure, whether caused by heat........by overloading........or even other modes of natural progressive structural failuresuch as impact induced fracturing........or fracturing due to overloading........can not match or create the conditions required for gravitationalacceleration to occur, it's literally impossible. There is no suchthing as....Some force must be introduced to quickly remove all support frombeneath the literally falling visible upper part of the building seenin the video. The claimedcollapse of the building(NIST probable collapse sequence starting with column 79 on the left)........that essentially happens........isphysically inconsistent with what weof natural progressive structural failure (defined as a timeconsuming process of individual/sequential/simultaneous failureinvolving one or a number of related structural components). It'sfor the lower part of thedamaged building (reportedly three corecolumns and nine perimeter columns)........to have naturally progressively collapsed inway thatcould result in the upper part of the buildingdescending straight down through itself (NIST probable collapsesequence starting with column 79 circled below) at anythinggravitational acceleration forperiod of time....Any building collapse like that seen playing out below (asseen from the South) resulting from a natural progressive structuralfailure of a steel frame building including a 105 foot 2.25 secondperiod of gravitational acceleration is anphysical impossibility........and there isno mode or combination of modes ofnatural progressive structural failure drivenby gravity thatcangive rise to the conditions required for free fall to haveoccurred atpoint during it's descent....The scenario playing out below is anphysical impossibility.Just as there is no such thing as, nor is there anyfailure mode known as....There is simply no point during a natural progressive gravity drivencollapse of any steel frame skyscraper where one could say....For the 2.25 seconds (eight stories, approximately 105 feet) that wethe upper part of the buildingat gravitationalacceleration ithave been usingof it's potentialenergy to crush the building contents, columns and other structuralcomponents beneath it and undergo free fall(asillustrated by this frangible impedance scenario)....It'sfor the lowerdamaged part of the building to have naturally progressively collapsedin a way that could result in the upper part of the building actuallyas it descendedstraight down throughitself, through the path of maximum resistance (below right), and then,driven onby gravity, actuallyto accelerate sonearly to gravitational acceleration (below left) as to requirefor any difference between the two to be detected....Somepowerful enough to quickly removefrom beneath the upper part of the building as it descendedbe introduced to explain the observed rate of descent during the 2.25second period of gravitational acceleration. For the 2.25 seconds that thebuildingat gravitational acceleration, nopowerful enough to quickly removefrom beneath theupper part of the building was seen to be introduced fromthe building, and nopowerful enough to quickly removefrom beneath the upper part of the building is knownto have existedthe building as an element or normalfunction of it's infrastructure. For a load supported by a column todescend at gravitational acceleration, all supportbe quicklyremoved, there'sno other way. Itbe knockedout, pulled out, blown out, vaporized etc. Since no eight story tallboulders were seen rumbling through Manhatten that day that could havequicklyout all support........and no suspicious looking Frenchmen were spotted rigging for verinage(a form of controlled demolition) the night before that could havequicklyout all support........and no bombs or rockets were seen to be dropped on/fired at it thatcould have quicklyout all support........and no giant laser beams or other secret weapons were being tested inthe area that could have quicklyall support........and nocapable of quickly removing all support frombeneath the upper part of the building existed in the building as anormal function of it's infrastructure (blue)........itfollows that whatever thewas thatbe introduced to explain the observed 2.25 seconds of descentat gravitional acceleration, ithave been introduced sometimethe event, and unless someone can show how thethatbe introduced eitheror justthe collapse of the building was introduced fromthe building, or that it was already existingthe building asa normal function of it's infrastructure, the process of elimination reallyleavespossible explanation for the building's behaviour.Some energetic material powerful enough to quickly remove all supportfrom beneath the upper part of the building during the 2.25 second periodof gravitational accelerationhave been physically transportedthe building some timethe event, itto bein. The explosion model is theone........that canmatch and empirically betocreate the conditions that wemust have existed........beneath thevisible upper part of the buildingduring its observed largely symmetrical descent at gravitationalacceleration for approximately 105 feet in 2.25 seconds....The undisputed (both the NIST and independent researchers alike agree)observation of a significant well defined period of gravitational acceleration....(0 to 1.75 seconds): acceleration less than that of gravity (i.e., slower than free fall)(4.0 to 5.4 seconds): decreased acceleration, again less than that of gravity....means that an explosion, or a number of explosions,haveoccurred that was powerful enough to quickly removefrom beneath the upper part of the building (below right), either all atonce or incrementally in advance of its descent, permitting it to descendat gravitational acceleration for the observed period and under theconditions required (below left) for free fall to occur....The empirically established fact that WTC7 was brought down byexplosives immediately shines a bright spotlight on literally thewho could possibly have carried out a covert domestic operationof this magnitude (all the events of that day).... thewhohad exclusive 24/7 access to the highly secured building (WTC7).... thewho were in complete control of the security system forthe building.... thewho had ready access to the quantityand quality of energetic materials required.... and thewho had the required expertise in the effective use of said energeticmaterials. The fact is thatthe Department of Defense/CentralIntelligence Agency could've done it. And just as one needn't be IsaacNewton to see there is no other possible explanation for the behavior ofWTC7 other than energetic materials having been physically transportedinside the building, one needn't be Sherlock Holmes to see there is noother possible explanation as to who could have done it since the buildingwas in perpetual lock down for many years as a highly securedgovernment facility.... it's elementary.



Last edited by Aemilius on Fri Dec 04, 2015 2:29 pm; edited 49 times in total