Last updated on: January 24, 2017 10:24 IST

'Modi took to the dais and said he would like to step down as chief minister over the riots.'

'Immediately, people from several sides got up and said there was no need to do so.'

'Whether it was orchestrated or not, Shourie wasn't sure.'

'But, according to him, Vajpayee felt that it was a coup.'

A fascinating account from Ullekh N P's new book, The Untold Vajpayee.

IMAGE: Then prime minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee, then deputy prime minister L K Advani and then Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi.

April 7, 2002. (Prime Minister Atal Bihari) Vajpayee was in a pensive mood when he spoke to reporters in New Delhi hours before he left for Singapore and Cambodia on a five-day official tour.

Shortly after take-off, Arun Shourie, Vajpayee's disinvestment minister, was approached by (Vajpayee's adopted son-in-law) Ranjan Bhattacharya in the plane. 'Shourieji, please go and meet him. Baapji is terribly upset.'

Shourie found the PM deeply disturbed, not looking up, his face grave. He appeared crestfallen.

Soon, Shourie realised that PM was upset for one major reason: Gujarat.

On February 27, 2002, a group of people from a Muslim populated area of Godhra had set fire to a few bogies of a train -- the Sabarmati Express -- which carried pilgrims from Ayodhya, a town considered holy by the Hindus.

Massive riots broke out, mostly targeting Muslims, for nearly a week.

All the killing and pillaging in Gujarat had given Vajpayee a bad name, the more so because Gujarat had a BJP government in place, with a chief minister who had reportedly not risen enough to the occasion to rein in the violence.

Vajpayee was blamed for his failure as PM to get rid of Chief Minister Narendra Modi, who reportedly shouted back at a Muslim leader on the phone for seeking help after a mob had gathered outside his house.

Some hours later, the Muslim leader was lynched, and Modi is alleged to have asked the police forces to let the violence continue.

At that moment, Modi seemed to be the villain who brought a lot of shame to the central government.

IMAGE: Armed mobs confront a policemen during the horrific Gujarat riots of 2002.

Modi had also dared to publicly snub Vajpayee at a press conference where he was seated alongside the prime minister.

The reporter wanted to know Vajpayee's message for the chief minister in the wake of the riots.

In controlled displeasure, Vajpayee stated that Modi should 'follow his Rajdharma.'

He explained that Rajdharma was a meaningful term, and for somebody in a position of power, it meant not discriminating among the higher and lower classes of society or people of any religion.

In a bid to stop Vajpayee from saying something scathing about him, Modi turned towards Vajpayee, tried to catch his eye and said with a strong note of threatening defiance, 'Hum bhi wahi kar rahe hain, sahib (That is what we are also doing, Sir).'

Vajpayee immediately changed tack and said, 'I am sure Narendrabhai is also doing the same.'

IMAGE: Narendra Modi, then Gujarat's chief minister, pays obeisance to then prime minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee.

Three days before his foreign tour in April, when Vajpayee visited the Shah Alam camp in Ahmedabad, which housed 9,000 Muslims displaced by the riots, he was deeply touched when a woman told him that he alone could save them from the hell that their lives had become.

Now, on the flight to Singapore, Vajpayee was worried he would expose himself to more humiliation while outside the country.

His grouse was: Why am I being paraded abroad at such time?

Shourie suggested that the PM speak to Advani, who had by now become the deputy prime minister, about the possibilities of salvaging the situation -- it could even mean replacing Modi.

But even after the 'pep talk' with Shourie, Vajpayee appeared cheerless. He told Shourie that he would speak to Advani about it.

The Gujarat issue came up in an interview on the third and final day of their stay in Singapore.

The journalist who interviewed Vajpayee first stated that Singaporeans were wary of communal disturbances, clearly indicating that he was referring to the recent riots in Gujarat, under BJP rule.

Then he shot off his question: 'And in India such disturbances have happened not once, but several times. In this regard what can Singapore learn from India's experience and what can you share?'

IMAGE: A protest against the Modi government in Gujarat, 2002.

'Vajpayee paused and rubbed his forehead with his right hand before answering, betraying a level of discomfiture in answering questions related to the Gujarat riots. Then, weighing his words to make it as official as it could get, he said, "Whatever happened in India was very unfortunate. The riots have been brought under control".'

'"If at the Godhra station, the passengers of the Sabarmati Express had not been burnt alive, then perhaps the Gujarat tragedy could have been averted. It is clear there was some conspiracy behind this incident".'

'"It is also a matter of concern that there was no prior intelligence available on this conspiracy. Alertness is essential in a democracy. We have been cautious".'

'"And if one does not ignore even small incidents like one used to in the past, then one will certainly be successful in fighting terrorism".'

Clearly, he was on the defensive, and the issue worried him no end.

The Indian delegation led by Vajpayee returned on April 11. The next day, senior BJP leaders were to attend a national executive meet in Goa.

Shourie went home and took a shower. He was reading a book when he got a call from Brajesh Mishra asking if he had booked tickets to Goa. Shourie said he had.

'Please cancel them. You are going with the PM and the deputy PM in the PM's aircraft,' Mishra said, emphasising that if he didn't go, both Vajpayee and Advani would not talk if they were left alone in a plane.

IMAGE: Then prime minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee, right, with L K Advani, then deputy prime minister and home minister.

Narendra Modi was considered close to Advani during the Vajpayee era.

When Shourie boarded the plane, Vajpayee was already there, seated next to the window, and facing him, across a table, on a window seat was Advani.

The external affairs minister, Jaswant Singh, was also there.

The plane took off and after a few minutes, Vajpayee took a newspaper from the table in front of him and opened it so widely that he didn't have to face Advani at all.

A little while later, Advani also picked up a newspaper and began to read.

Shourie and Singh looked at each other and sighed.

Then Shourie surprised himself. He pulled the newspaper out of Vajpayee's hands and interjected, 'Vajpayeeji, newspapers can be read later also. Why don't you tell Advaniji what you wanted to tell him?'

Vajpayee kept the newspapers away, and muttered in his usual style about what had to be done.

First, Venkaiah Naidu would replace Jana Krishnamurthi as BJP president. Then he said, 'Modi has to go.'

By the time they landed in Goa, the decision was taken: Modi would go.

Jaswant Singh shared another version of the episode. He narrated that though Advani didn't protest when Vajpayee insisted that Modi had to go, the home minister added, 'There will be chaos in the state.'

IMAGE: Prime Minister Narendra Modi and External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj present the Bangladesh Liberation War Honour to Atal Bihari Vajpayee's son-in-law Ranjan Bhattacharya, daughter Namita Bhattacharya and grand daughter Neha Bhattacharya, June 11, 2015.

At Panjim in April 2002, the national executive meet began, and a short while later, Modi took to the dais and said he would like to step down as chief minister over the riots.

Immediately, people from several sides got up and said there was no need to do so.

Whether it was orchestrated or not, Shourie wasn't sure. But, according to him, Vajpayee felt that it was a coup.

Sensing that things were not going as planned, Shourie got up and described what had gone on between Advani and Vajpayee on the plane and the agreement they had reached thereafter.

But shouts kept emerging from the delegates: 'It cannot be done! Modi cannot be allowed to go!'

Vajpayee immediately understood the situation, and said, 'Let's decide on it later.'

'It can't be decided later, it has to be decided now,' somebody shouted.

And as if on cue, it became a slogan.

Shourie observed that Advani hadn't said anything though he knew very well that Vajpayee wanted Modi out.

Seeing things take a different turn, Vajpayee kept mum, opting against a confrontational stance.

Perhaps, for all his bravery, he was worried about younger leaders publicly questioning his authority.

He would never forget that humiliation.

Excerpted from The Untold Vajpayee, by Ullekh N P, Penguin Viking, 2017, Rs 599, with the publisher's permission.