Bernie Sanders supporters at the Nevada Democratic Convention, 64 in all, were denied delegate status due to missing or altered voter registration. Voter registrations are being changed all over the country in what some are calling voter registration card election fraud. In addition, an allegedly heavy-handed bias against Sanders supporters by Democratic Convention leaders led to protests and police intervention at the Nevada Convention. Heavy reports that this incident has divided the party, and now more Democrats are saying they will not vote for Hillary due to the party’s heavy-handed approach at the Nevada Democratic Convention.

Hillary Clinton, however, is not necessarily implicated in the alleged election fraud. She could be completely unaware of any sort of election tampering. Virtually any political group could have hired hackers and paid off individuals to carry out a well-organized attack on democracy. The culprits could be Republican, Democrat, donor-related, or even a foreign power. There is no way to know at this time who is behind the changed voter registration cards or other signs of election tampering.

Voter Registration Card Election Fraud Is Widespread

Bernie Sanders supporters from California to New York are discovering they are no longer registered Democrats. Alleged voter registration card election fraud has been cropping up all over the country, according to Heavy. It seems that in states with closed primaries, Bernie supporters have been targeted. Their party affiliation has been changed from Democrat to Independent or even Republican. In addition, there have been unexplained purges of hundreds of thousands of Democratic voters. These people are no longer registered at all. Election Fraud Watch has evidence that thousands of eligible voters were purged in California. New York and Arizona reported similar difficulties.

Election Fraud by Weighted Voting As Well As Voter Card Fraud

Voter registration card election fraud is the most obvious form of alleged fraud observed in 2016, but there are others being reported as well. Black Box Voting explains how weighted voting is possible using a variety of current voting machines. Weighted voting means that some votes can be set up to count as 1.5 votes, for example, while other votes may count only as a half vote or some other fraction. Election Fraud Watch believes this is happening in the 2016 election based on exit polls compared to votes.

Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton [Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images]

How Voter Registration Card Election Fraud Is Done

Bernie Sanders supporters from all over the nation were specifically targeted for voter registration card election fraud, according to Counterpunch. In addition, there are significant discrepancies between exit polls and actual votes counted. These discrepancies are allegedly indicative of weighted voting. The Inquisitr has the details here.

New York Board of Election is currently involved in an investigation as they attempt to fend off a civil suit. Stewart McCauley is currently investigating voter registration card election fraud in New York. He told Counterpunch that not every aspect of the fraud could have been carried out by hacking and that someone within the Board of Elections, or at least having access to physical files, had to have been complicit in the plot.

“Two by hackers (possibly), and two that had to have been carried out by BoE [Board of Elections] officials and/or employees:

1) Logging in (most likely after identifying the voter’s candidate of choice) to the BoE database remotely and tampering with registration records, including back-dating of changes

2) Crudely forged hand signatures to alter party affiliation via paper forms

3) BoE “nuclear” approach: actively purging eligible voters through a variety of methods, including intentional bouncing of maintenance letters (but note that the majority of our respondents/plaintiffs could not legally be removed as it has been less than five years since they registered)

4) BoE officials and employees actively neglecting to register new voters”

How Election Fraud For Hire Is Done

Andres Sepulveda, a convicted South American hacker who helped change the outcome of dozens of South American elections, agreed to an interview with Bloomberg. He revealed his part in subverting dozens of elections in Latin America.

Andres was asked if he thought American presidential campaign is being tampered with. His reply was certain and without a doubt, but he did not go into specific reasons or methods.

“I’m 100 percent sure it is.”

Neither Bernie Sanders nor Hillary Clinton would have known if someone was rigging the election, according to Andre Sepulveda, The hacktivist for hire explained that most of the candidates he helped probably never knew they were being helped by a hacker. They would have no way of knowing they were being harmed either unless the plot was discovered. His usual employer was a Karl Rove-like figure, not a candidate. He said he had only met a few candidates in all his years of hacking. Sepulveda charged $20,000 a month for his premium package, which included his full range of skills, laundered through layers of consultants and a team of seven to 15 people. By American campaign standards, that price is nothing. Andre ran attack ads, researched the opposition, and suppressed voter turn out in various ways. He also fabricated thousands of fake social media accounts. With 30,000 Twitter accounts, he found he could create his own trends.

“When I realized that people believe what the Internet says more than reality, I discovered that I had the power to make people believe almost anything.”

Hillary Clinton [Photo by Bill Pugliano/Getty Images]

Bernie Sanders was hurt by the alleged voter registration card election fraud, and Hillary Clinton benefited, but with the discovery of the fraud, she too is now hurt. It becomes a scandalous and divisive issue for the entire party that is galvanizing voters against Hillary Clinton. So who really paid for the election tampering? It is an interesting case because of the two outsiders, Sanders and Trump. The Republican Party is very reluctantly supporting Trump while many of their financial donors are sending their money to Clinton. The Democratic Party is obviously biased in favor of Clinton. Having light shed on the extent of their partiality and lack of concern over the election tampering, makes the Democratic Party look dishonest. Since the discovery of the fraud, who is benefiting from any of this? Will authorities be able to stop the fraud and set things right?

Bernie Sanders supporters are feeling more disenfranchised than ever since the Democratic Party failed to be sensitive to their plight as victims of voter registration card election fraud.

[Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images]