CableONE Denies Using Credit Scores to Provide Worse Service A few weeks ago we wrote about how Cable One CEO Thomas Might recently crowed that his company had implemented a system that managed to deliver worse customer service to customers with low credit scores. According to Might, the company had developed a "very rigorous FICI credit scoring process" on its video customers since 2013 that involves somehow flagging the accounts so that company support representatives don't spend as much time on support with those users as they otherwise would.

"We don't turn people away," Might said, but he added that the cable company's support staff isn't going to "spend 15 minutes setting up an iPhone app" for a lower-value customer. Not too surprisingly, the idea that a cable company would discriminate and actively lower customer service quality based on credit score turned some heads at the FCC, which is busy contemplating new privacy rules to protect broadband customers from behavior just like this. As such, CableONE has apparently written to the FCC to try and explain Might's comments. According to Fierce Cable, which originally highlighted Might's comments, CableOne claims it's not doing anything wrong because it's technically using two different programs to determine who gets worse customer service. Like most cable companies, CableONE states it uses credit scores and a standard credit pre-qualification to determine the kind of promotions and pricing a customer can receive. But it then uses a "separate, internal program" called Lifetime Value (LTV) to determine what CableOne customer is deserving of better or worse customer service. "Importantly, the LTV program has nothing at all to do with the use of credit scores," Cable ONE COO Julie Laulis said in a letter to the FCC. "Any Cable One customer can, through a good payment history, achieve the highest LTV level and achieve additional levels of customer service and other benefits. This LTV level is independent of a credit score, and a credit score is not used to determine levels of service or loyalty rewards." Why does CableONE need to clarify this? Because using credit scores to discriminate violates existing law, and would most certainly violate the new broadband privacy rules the FCC is considering. While CableONE claims the "press conflated the two programs," Might's comments were what tied FICO scores to customer service in the first place (telecom executives often forget the public can hear what's said at investor conferences), and the company hasn't demanded any correction to Fierce Cable's original report. Why does CableONE need to clarify this? Because using credit scores to discriminate violates existing law, and would most certainly violate the new broadband privacy rules the FCC is considering. While CableONE claims the "press conflated the two programs," Might's comments were what tied FICO scores to customer service in the first place (telecom executives often forget the public can hear what's said at investor conferences), and the company hasn't demanded any correction to Fierce Cable's original report.







News Jump California Defends Its Net Neutrality Law; AT&T's Traffic Up 20% Despite Data Traffic Actually Being Down; + more news Are The Comcast-Charter X1 Talks Dead In The Water?; AT&T May Offer Phone Plans With Ads For Discounts; + more news Europe's Top Court: Net Neutrality Rules Bar Zero Rating; ViacomCBS To Rebrand CBS All Access As Paramount+; + more news Verizon To Buy Reseller TracFone For $7B; 5G Not The Competitive Threat To Cable Many Thought It Would Be; + more news MS.Wants Records From AT&T On $300M Project; Google Fiber Outages In Austin, Houston, Other Texan Cities; + more news States With The Biggest Decreases In Speed; AT&T Hopes You'll Forget Its Fight Against Accurate Maps; + more news AT&T's CEO Has A Familiar $olution To US Broadband Woes; EarthLink Files Suit Against Charter; + more news 5G Doesn't Live Up To Hype, AT&T's 5G Slower Than Its 4G; Cord-Cutting Now In 37% of Broadband Households; + more news FCC Cited False Broadband Data Despite Warnings; ZTE, Huawei Replacement Cost Is $1.87B, But Only $1B Allocated; + more Cogeco Rejects Altice USA's Atlantic Broadband Bid; AT&T Is Astroturfing The FCC In Support Of Trump Attack; + more news ---------------------- this week last week most discussed

Most recommended from 19 comments



OldschoolDSL

Premium Member

join:2006-02-23

Indian Orchard, MA 10 recommendations OldschoolDSL Premium Member ID Theft I'm 35, but on my 18th Birthday, I had 2 things happen to me. The 1st being chickenpox and the 2nd is receiving phone calls from creditors from all over the map.



The idea of someone further punishing the innocent only sickens me.



CableOne should be less concerned about someone's history and more concerned with respecting their customers. If someone has been a loyal customer for 25 years (a quarter of a century), why wouldn't you value them?



This seems more like a form of discrimination.

tshirt

Premium Member

join:2004-07-11

Snohomish, WA 5 recommendations tshirt Premium Member Each is reasonable credit checks can see if a given customer churned back and forth between providers

Lifetime value can determine if a given customer calls and complains/requests service calls more frequently then surrounding homes and if a tech has cleaned up the in house lines and tested the drop, it could be that , that customer is more expensive to keep

there are more and less desirable customers, offering less discount to those who drive up costs is a reasonable analytic.



My problem is Cable One CEO Thomas Might recently crowed that his company had implemented

That he publicly seemed to dis' those that their programs ID as potentially problematic.

His goal should be to offer equal service to ALL, even as they privately try to equalize the cost/return and only call out/cut service those who are deliberately attempting to cost more than they pay, an event that SHOULD be very rare.

at best sounding gleeful was incredibly poor PR which could make him a CEO too expensive to keep.





GlennLouEarl

3 brothers, 1 gone

Premium Member

join:2002-11-17

Richmond, VA 4 recommendations GlennLouEarl Premium Member So, they forgot about the "Law of Transference"? "Program 1" uses the credit score to rank customers. "Program 2" uses the derived ranking to determine whether you actually deserve the service you're paying for.



Yep, still illegal. Just another reason why these types of companies shouldn't even be allowed to do credit checks at all.