Has Scholastic, the direct-to-classroom publisher and bookseller, lost its way, pushing cheap toys and video games straight into your kids' backpacks, all in the name of promoting reading and kicking a few bucks back to our ailing schools?

Judging by the number of articles and posts I’ve run across lately, I don't think I'm alone in having serious doubts about what role – if any – Scholastic should be allowed to have in schools.

I understand that the schools receive books and teaching material from Scholastic based on sales through students, and I don't have a particular issue with that. Other than the fact that it’s a little sad when school budgets are apparently low enough that supplemental fund raising is needed to help equip the classroom, but that's another story. Obviously, I wholeheartedly support the idea of promoting reading to children. Selling books to kids at decent prices, which in turn helps to support the school seems to be a reasonable balance then.

One of the key factors to me is that most books aren't really considered status symbols by children and the school library is always there for borrowing reading material. So if a few kids in the class buy books from Scholastic and receive their purchases in the classroom, kids whose parents chose not to support the program, or simply couldn't afford it aren't likely to suffer hurt feelings. But as soon as you cross the line into tie-in books (like Pokemon, for example); or even worse, into toys, things get much more complicated. More expensive products truly separate the "haves" from the "have nots," potentially add a significant degree of peer pressure and make it really difficult to justify this as a reading-promotion program. Most kids aren't going to ask their parents for a book; they're going to go straight to the toy.

I suspect there would be an outcry if Toys 'R' Us, for example, was allowed to direct-market videogames to students through their school, but Scholastic has snuck this in under the guise of selling books. They have defended the practice by suggesting that "some kids learn through video games," as reported in the Chicago Sun-Times. That's lame...

Looking through this month's offering, which all three of my children bought home from school (complete with reminders on their calendar of when monthly Scholastic book orders are due), I found a selection of books, but also the following products:

Book accompanied by glow-in-the-dark vampire teeth

Book accompanied by plush bunny

Book accompanied by "4 Cool Tattoos"

Book accompanied by a card game

Book accompanied by an audio CD

Telescope kit (accompanied by an astronomy book)

70-piece magnetic car construction and racing kit

A magic set including ring, fake finger and scarf

Themed book set with bonus "Glittery Butterfly Pen"

A kitten-themed writing set including stickers, stationery, stamps, pen and storage box

Bakugan drawing set including pencil crayons

Hannah Montana book pack with writing set (Hannah Montana notepad, paper, stickers, pen, pencil, etc...)

Littlest Pet Shop math book with stickers

Transformers reading workbooks with stickers

Panda jigsaw puzzle plus electronic virtual pet

Green-themed science book accompanied by material to make recycled paper

Book accompanied by a fake spilled ketchup packet (for spilled ketchup-related pranking)

High School musical posters with markers and (shudder) a bonus velvet folder to color

More velvet and coloring, this time with a set of NHL posters and markers

Fingerboard mini skateboard (complete with extra wheels, mini wrench and screwdriver, screws, rivets and a "32-Page Color Booklet" that I suppose is intended to make this pass as reading material as opposed to a toy.

Out of 79 items offered for sale on this flyer, I counted 16 that were direct TV show or movie tie-ins. Mind you, we don't get cable, so I probably missed some. And, out of the 79 items, 20 are pushing the definition of "book" to various degrees. The current flyer doesn’t contain video games, but you don't have to look very hard to find Scholastic school catalogs flogging everything from Lego to Nintendo DS games. Some of the items are indeed educational, like the telescope for example, but that isn't the point.

Scholastic is a large company with 6,500 employees and 2008 revenues of $2.2 billion. This is obviously big business and adding $30 videogames to the mix would certainly increase revenue compared to a $2.99 chapter book, so I can understand why they think this is a good idea. But, should they be allowed to?

I don't know about you, but when I buy a toy or a videogame, I'm going to go to a store (brick and mortar or online) where there is selection, I don't feel like I’m being guilted into making the purchase and no other kid is going to feel bad because I walk into the school and hand the toy to my kids in front of their classmates.