Date Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:25:09 -0700 From Greg KH <> Subject [RFC] Kernel version numbering scheme change Hi,



You brought this topic up a few months ago, and passed it off as

something we would discuss at the kernel summit. But that never

happened, so I figured I'd bring it up again here.



So, as someone who constantly is dealing with kernel version numbers all

the time with the -stable trees, our current numbering scheme is a pain

a times. How about this proposal instead?



We number the kernel based on the year, and the numbers of releases we

have done this year:

YEAR.NUMBER.MINOR_RELEASE



For example, the first release in 2009 would be called:

2009.0.0

The second:

2009.1.0



If we want to be a bit more "non-zero-counting" friendly: we can start

at "1" for the number:

2009.1.0 for the first release

2009.2.0 for the second.



Then the stable releases can increment the minor number:

2009.1.1 for the first stable release

2009.1.2 for the second.

and so on.



Benefits of this is it more accuratly represents to people just how old

the kernel they are currently running is (2.6.9 would be have been

2004.9.0 on this naming scheme.)



Yes, we can handle the major/minor macros in the kernel to provide a

compatible number so that automated scripts will not break, that's not a

big deal.



Any thoughts?



Let the bike-shedding begin!



thanks,



greg k-h





