There are moments in edited TV content when a keyed-in viewer can see a cut intended to make a “comfort edit”, smoothing out the narrative. The Chuck Todd interview with President Obama was riddled with them. Even when being interviewed by a fellow ideological traveler.

But first to content:

On ISIS:

@00:24 “this administration has” – President Obama using third person distancing tactic discussing an uncomfortable negative. When the topic is positive, or viewed as favorable currency, the term “my administration” is used.

@01:05 “what I have done over the past several months” – President Obama knowing he was caught flat-footed, having called ISIS “JV”, and having admitted not having a strategy is now trying to give appearance of them having been working on this all along.

@01:45 “the next phase, is to start going on some offense” – Again, framing incompetence as if there was a previous outline/plan in place. This is similar to the re-writing of the Syrian RED LINE strategy, ‘yeah, yeah, we, um, we meant to um, create that Russian intervention WMD thing’. Embarrassingly juvenile for a President.

@02:40 Question: What do you want the American people to take away from a planned speech the day before 9/11? “more than anything I want the American People to understand the nature of the threat and how we are going to deal with it” – AKA Obama trying to remove the obvious understanding that actually HE is the one who doesn’t, or at least didn’t, understand the threat, and had/has no plan to deal with it.

@06:20 Softly called out on “JV” Comments. Immediate defensive reaction – “No, no, no, keep in mind that I’ve said that regionally there were a whole series of organizations that were focused primarily locally, and were not focused on the homeland because (comparison to OBL) … not yet, not EVERY regional terrorist organization is automatically a threat to us that would call for a major offensive“.

@09:25 “the boots on the ground have to be Syrian” (Chuck Todd asks “WHO”?) – Obama having publicly committed himself to the removal of Assad kinda removes help from the Syrian National Army; and the Free Syrian Army is a corrupted fractured contingent of ne’er-do-wells; and Obama previously saying that it’s impossible to arm doctors, lawyers and professionals who cannot defeat radicalism…. well, who’s boots does Obama plan on supporting? So POTUS puts three groups on the table: The Syrian army, ISIS, and some weirdly defined “Moderate Opposition” – and then says we should support the moderate opposition who are pinched between the Syrian Army and ISIS. Uh huh. Gotcha.

@12:45 “what ISIS represents isn’t Islam, it’s an abortion, a distortion, an abomination that has somehow tied Islam to the nilistic thinking that any civilized nation should eliminate“.

@14:00 POTUS cannot remember the name of the beheaded Americans, therefore he goes into vague and ambiguous terms to describe how the families of those journalists must have been impacted by the horror. …”these folks who are effected”.

@17:00 Topic switch to EBOLA (note Ukraine is ***crickets***)

EBOLA

@20:10 Topic switch to Immigration

IMMIGRATION

@21:50 “Jeh Johnson has provided me ideas on how we can take executive action” […] “and I’m being honest now” – RED FLAG ALERT for anyone skilled in spotting liars; parsing in/out of truth -and openly defining as such- is the most transparently obvious indication a person is lying.

“I’m being honest now about the politics of it. This problem with unaccompanied children that we saw a couple weeks ago, where you had, from Central America, a surge of kids who were showing up at the border, got a lot of attention. And a lot of Americans started thinking, ‘We’ve got this immigration crisis on our hands’“.

“The truth of the matter is that the politics did shift midsummer because of that problem, I want to spend some time, even as we’re getting all our ducks in a row for the executive action, I also want to make sure that the public understands why we’re doing this, why it’s the right thing for the American people, why it’s the right thing for the American economy.”[…]

What you have right there is THE BIG LIE inside the interview.

Incredibly, and yes we do mean i-n-c-r–e-d-i-b-l-y, we have outlined, with empirical evidence in full support, the entire construct of the “Unaccompanied Alien Children Crisis” was manufactured political psy-ops.

The Cloward-Piven strategy of crisis creation was used to push a political agenda. But what’s more alarming than the creation of the crisis was the crisis being entirely fabricated.

There were no tens of thousands of UAC’s.

It was a ruse, a totally fabricated false construct. The design was to use the story of influxes of children to create a “humanitarian crisis”. This was then intended to stir up emotion, sympathetic emotion, toward the end goal of comprehensive immigration reform.

What caught Obama off guard was the backlash amid the electorate who have had enough of the nonsense with the immigration issues.

Telling the American people “the border is secure”, then turning around a year later and saying “the border is in a state of crisis”, is not just ridiculous – it’s transparently obvious as a political scheme.

President Obama does not EVER give the broader American electorate the intellectual credit for being able to see the larger construct of his schemes. Perhaps because he is surrounded by non-questioning sycophants he actually believes the broad public is as unintelligent as the team surrounding him.

On immigration, his team manufactured a crisis that blew up in his face; the reason for the explosion was the transparently obvious lies needed to construct it.