Harold Hoff

2018-01-14 20:18:03 -0500

Under my NGO (Keep43) I commented as follows: This is exactly the point that our NGO is making, and others like PAFE (Parents as First Educators). 4MyCanada, Canada Family Action, and many others…



The problem is that Brown is simply a third side of the progressive-liberal coin, and we would like to boil down what the contentions are, and what seriously normal people who want to live their lives and protect their children from molestation by the State are bothered by:



1) Carbon Tax: Is simply a U.N. Initiative to seduce nations to send funds under a false pretense to enable “wealth equalization” between third world and first world countries. It has nothing to do with saving the environment as the U.N. itself has already admitted, it is to support agenda 21 and 2030. Further impoverishing those least able to pay in Canada is regressive, does not save the environment, and causes more societal harm. Brown supports this.



2) The gender ideology: used to sexually confuse kindergarten-aged children that this mental illness is actually a “life style” choice. No it is not and corrupting the morals of a minor is still a criminal offense; it is child abuse, not education. Brown supports this.



3) Further to (2), ON Bill 89 says that now the school has confused your minor child into thinking they are something they are not, if parents don’t actively pursue gender reassignment, that is considered child abuse when in fact the intentional perversion and confusion of child is the actual child abuse. ON89 allows the cash hungry child “protection” industry to apprehend and traffic children for caseload and revenue targets, thus enabling further child abuse. Brown supports this.



4) Graphic Sex/Ed. Yes, we know that the next frontier of progressive thinking is to mainstream pedophilia as an orientation. Wynne’s architect of the graphic ON Sex/Ed curriculum is to groom children and normalize anal sex and masturbation, and her architect is a convicted child sex offender. Normal people might ask if there’s an ulterior motive to this, yet Brown supports it and shuts down discussion on the issue. In NO uncertain terms, that makes him a child predator just like the scum in Ontario Legislature. Willful blindness and silence IS acceptance. Brown supports this.



5) There are other issues, but the above 4 are good examples. We don’t want perverts, child molesters, and pedophiles setting policy, nor those who aid and abet them by tacit consent. Brown supports this.



You will find the end result is a split vote, giving ON an electoral spanking like AB experienced when the AB PCs drove normal ethical and upstanding people to Wild Rose, and defaulting to the awful NDP Gov’t they are now inflicted with. Here in ON we’re doing the same, driving people who hate harming families and children towards Ontario Trillium Party. You either stand for something, as WE do, or you stand for nothing, or you stand for what is outlined above. There’s no two-way bet to hedge here. E&OE

commented