Line 0.0.0 THURSDAY, MAY 13th.

Line 0.0.1 Before Dr Lloyd (chairman) and Messrs

Line 0.0.2 Barwise, and Wylie, J's.P.

Line 0.0.3 ALLEGED INDECENT ASSAULT.

Line 0.0.4 Wm. Ramden, otherwise " Fattam,"

Line 0.0.5 was remanded for a week on a charge

Line 0.0.6 of indecently assaulting a little girl

Line 0.0.7 Robertson. Bail was allowed in one

Line 0.0.8 surety of £30.

Line 0.0.9 THE PROFESSOR AND THE PONY CART.

Line 0.0.10 Herr Geo. Savin de Chaneet pro

Line 0.0.11 ceeded against Patrick Lyons, 375

Line 0.0.12 Nicholson-street, for negligent driving

Line 0.0.13 on the 2nd inst.

Line 0.0.14 Mr Theodore Fink prosecuted on

Line 0.0.15 behalf of the League of Wheelman:

Line 0.0.16 Mr W. J. Tucker defended.

Line 0.0.17 Herr de Chaneet said that with Mr.

Line 0.0.18 Hennessy, a clerk in the Railway

Line 0.0.19 Department, he was on the Flemington

Line 0.0.20 road. Defendant, driving a pony

Line 0.0.21 cart, drove at them. They were both

Line 0.0.22 on bicycles. They dismounted, as they

Line 0.0.23 were nearly trampled on. Witness

Line 0.0.24 said "This is awful; we must prosteute

Line 0.0.25 yiu." Defendant said "Mly troubles

Line 0.0.26 about your prosecutiun," then whipped

Line 0.0.27 up his horse and drove away. He was

Line 0.0.28 on the wrong side of the road. He was

Line 0.0.29 insolent. The offence took place near

Line 0.0.30 the Flemington Bridge. Defendant

Line 0.0.31 was driving from town and witness was

Line 0.0.32 riding to town.

Line 0.0.33 To 31r. Tucker: ie had been riding

Line 0.0.34 a bicycle for 20 years. and knew the

Line 0.0.35 traflic regulations. Defendant refused

Line 0.0.36 to give his name and address, and

Line 0.0.37 drove rapidly away. Witness followed

Line 0.0.38 hun, and signalled to a po:iceman who

Line 0.0.39 took defendant's name and address.

Line 0.0.40 James G. Heunessy, said he was a

Line 0.0.41 shorthand clerk in the Railway De

Line 0.0.42 partment. He remembered 2nd inst.

Line 0.0.43 They were on their right side, and

Line 0.0.44 defendant ran them into the gutter.

Line 0.0.45 Witness had to dismount. If defendant

Line 0.0.46 had not pulled up, he would have been

Line 0.0.47 guilty of " murder " (laughter.)

Line 0.0.48 Constable Jno. Roddy said about

Line 0.0.49 half past 5 on the evening of the 2nd,

Line 0.0.50 he saw defendant chased by two

Line 0.0.51 cyclists. Witness stopped him and

Line 0.0.52 took his name and address.

Line 0.0.53 John Cousins recollected the Sunday

Line 0.0.54 afternoon. He was standing at his

Line 0.0.55 door and saw defendant diiving on the

Line 0.0.56 wrong side, when he pulled up amidst

Line 0.0.57 the two cyclists. Defendant was in

Line 0.0.58 fault.