JeanW



Offline



Activity: 26

Merit: 0







NewbieActivity: 26Merit: 0 Legitimate Uses of Bitcoins and the Dark Government March 28, 2015, 09:08:06 PM #1



On October 14, 2014, my husband BurtW was arrested by the Postal Police and had his Bitcoins seized by the federal government. Sound crazy? Heres a direct quote from the U.S. Postal Inspection Service website:



Asset Forfeiture

The Asset Forfeiture Program is an integral law enforcement tool that benefits the Postal Inspection Service by: (omitted) . . . 3. increasing revenue for law enforcement purposes, and 4. providing an enhanced 'esprit de corps' among law enforcement through equitable sharing.



The U.S. Postal Inspectors, a/k/a dark government, are instrumental in obtaining search warrants to search homes of Bitcoin traders and seize Bitcoins for the federal Asset Forfeiture Fund.



The evidentiary support for the search and seizures is the sworn testimony by U.S. Postal Inspectors that there are few legitimate reasons for Bitcoins; therefore, anyone with Bitcoins is mostly likely engaged in criminal activity.



I would like to have a list of legitimate reasons for Bitcoins to give to every judge in the 10th Judicial District so that no judge ever puts a middle aged engineer in solitary confinement again to give the U.S. Postal Inspection Service and U.S. Attorneys Office time to steal that engineers Bitcoins.



These are the legitimate uses I could think of:



Investment.

Dell accepts Bitcoins.

Overstock.com accepts Bitcoins.

U.S. Congressman Jared Polis accepts Bitcoins as political donations.

Red Cross accepts Bitcoins as donations.

Please help me with creating a list of legitimate uses for Bitcoins.



www.burtw.com

www.jmwagner.com I would like to create a list of legitimate uses of Bitcoins. Heres why:On October 14, 2014, my husband BurtW was arrested by the Postal Police and had his Bitcoins seized by the federal government. Sound crazy? Heres a direct quote from the U.S. Postal Inspection Service website:The Asset Forfeiture Program is an integral law enforcement tool thatThe U.S. Postal Inspectors, a/k/a dark government, are instrumental in obtaining search warrants to search homes of Bitcoin traders and seize Bitcoins for the federal Asset Forfeiture Fund.The evidentiary support for the search and seizures is the sworn testimony by U.S. Postal Inspectors that there are few legitimate reasons for Bitcoins; therefore, anyone with Bitcoins is mostly likely engaged in criminal activity.I would like to have a list of legitimate reasons for Bitcoins to give to every judge in the 10th Judicial District so that no judge ever puts a middle aged engineer in solitary confinement again to give the U.S. Postal Inspection Service and U.S. Attorneys Office time to steal that engineers Bitcoins.These are the legitimate uses I could think of:Please help me with creating a list of legitimate uses for Bitcoins.

HI-TEC99



Offline



Activity: 1918

Merit: 1157









LegendaryActivity: 1918Merit: 1157 Re: Legitimate Uses of Bitcoins and the Dark Government March 28, 2015, 09:31:11 PM

Last edit: June 16, 2019, 04:16:41 PM by HI-TEC99 #2



http://www.coindesk.com/information/what-can-you-buy-with-bitcoins/



A few US based things on their list follow.



Quote CheapAir.com, the California-based online travel booking website, started taking bitcoin in November 2013 and announced in July that it has completed more than $1.5m in bitcoin sales on flights, around 200,000 hotels and Amtrak railway bookings via its platform.



The Sacramento Kings NBA franchise accepts bitcoin for products including tickets, jerseys, hot dogs and beer. The team says it will accept the currency online and at the Sleep Train Arena, its home stadium.



The San Jose Earthquakes, a soccer club from California, implemented bitcoin integration at the teams Buck Shaw Stadium on 25th May. Coinbase is acting as the stadiums bitcoin payments processor, leveraging the exchanges tablet app to accept payments. Game attendees can use bitcoin to buy tickets at the box office and additionally pay for concessions at certain locations and buy merchandise at the stadium gift shop.



US satellite service provider DISH Network announced that it will start accepting bitcoin payments later this year. The Colorado-based company is one of the biggest content providers in America, with more than 14 million pay-TV subscribers. DISH says bitcoin payments will be made available to all customers who decide to make one-time payments on mydish.com starting in the third quarter of 2014, but it has not yet revealed an exact date. Once it does, it will become the biggest company to accept bitcoin to date. Last year DISH Network Corporation reported revenue of $13.9bn. The company has more than 30,000 employees.



Following its successful test with bitcoin micropayments provider BitWall back in February, the Chicago Sun-Times has announced that it has partnered with San Francisco-based bitcoin startup Coinbase to accept bitcoin payments for subscriptions. The announcement makes the Sun-Times the first US newspaper to accept bitcoin as a payment option.



A property listings site in the US gives a discount to users who advertise on the site and pay in bitcoin. The listings site, called RentHop, is offering landlords and agents who advertise properties in New York a discount of up to 60% if they pay for their adverts in bitcoin. RentHop customers pay for ads with credits purchased from the site.



How about paying for education with bitcoin? Orlando, Florida-based online interactive education specialist Treehouse now accepts bitcoin for its subscription web design and web development education services. The firm, which to date has raised $24.6m through six funding rounds, boasts 70,000 students who use the platform to learn valuable skills in languages and software such as Android, CSS, HTML, Java, jQuery, iOS and Ruby, among others.

There is a big list here.A few US based things on their list follow.

abercrombie



Offline



Activity: 1159

Merit: 1001









LegendaryActivity: 1159Merit: 1001 Re: Legitimate Uses of Bitcoins and the Dark Government March 29, 2015, 12:54:30 AM #3



If you're not white and need to send money to family in the 3rd world, Western Union and Moneygram have a nasty habit of increasing remittance prices to the poorest nations.



Remittances Remittances are a $500 billion market and a killer app for Bitcoin. I'm paraphrasing, but Andreas M. Antonopoulos said something like this in one of his many Youtube speeches:

Gleb Gamow

VIP

Legendary



Offline



Activity: 1428

Merit: 1120









In memoriamVIPLegendaryActivity: 1428Merit: 1120 Re: Legitimate Uses of Bitcoins and the Dark Government March 29, 2015, 01:08:16 AM #4 Quote The evidentiary support for the search and seizures is the sworn testimony by U.S. Postal Inspectors that there are few legitimate reasons for Bitcoins; therefore, anyone with Bitcoins is mostly likely engaged in criminal activity.

Here's what I would do, Jean, if I were in position to do such. Since the USPS has taken the steadfast position that Bitcoin is used mainly for criminal activity, then they should add to their formidable list of restrictions -



Again, I'm not one to start such a campaign, but hopefully those in unique positions able to read through what I've proposed will pick up the mantle of what I've outlined, in retrospect calling their bluff (for lack of a better term).



FWIW, I mentioned Burt in a post penned today pertaining to BFL using BitPay as an exchange to convert $10M+ USD worth of bitcoins to fiat that was deposited in some unknown bank under Sonny Vleisides' control. Surely, whatever Burt supposedly done nowhere reaches that magnitude.



Finally, thread related, there was the first ever NCAA Bitcoin St. Petersburg Bowl last year. I'm sure that the USPS garnered a few hundred grand worth of mailings directly related to this one event alone over the course of months leading up to the event, along with subsequent mailings after the fact. Oh, did I mention that the USPS is currently being used again for mailings as the second Bitcoin St. Petersburg Bowl for later this year is just starting to get geared up. Here's what I would do, Jean, if I were in position to do such. Since the USPS has taken the steadfast position that Bitcoin is used mainly for criminal activity, then they should add to their formidable list of restrictions - https://www.usps.com/ship/shipping-restrictions.htm - anything related to Bitcoin, e.g., miners, checks for bitcoins, periodicals, etc., for it's obvious to them that this Bitcoin thingy should be stopped in its tracks by all means and at all cost. Surely, the USPS doesn't want to be party to such activities by continuing to process Bitcoin-related mailings, hence their public position, ergo in the name of protecting the public, Bitcoin-related mailings should be 100% restricted. If they don't follow through with this concerning proposal, then by default there's no concern, and the USPS will have fingers pointed at them for causing an uproar when one wasn't warranted. The beauty part of this is that the fingers mentioned will be attached to hands belonging to those on Wall Street.Again, I'm not one to start such a campaign, but hopefully those in unique positions able to read through what I've proposed will pick up the mantle of what I've outlined, in retrospect calling their bluff (for lack of a better term).FWIW, I mentioned Burt in a post penned today pertaining to BFL using BitPay as an exchange to convert $10M+ USD worth of bitcoins to fiat that was deposited in some unknown bank under Sonny Vleisides' control. Surely, whatever Burt supposedly done nowhere reaches that magnitude.Finally, thread related, there was the first ever NCAA Bitcoin St. Petersburg Bowl last year. I'm sure that the USPS garnered a few hundred grand worth of mailings directly related to this one event alone over the course of months leading up to the event, along with subsequent mailings after the fact. Oh, did I mention that the USPS is currently being used again for mailings as the second Bitcoin St. Petersburg Bowl for later this year is just starting to get geared up.

jbreher



Offline



Activity: 2870

Merit: 1504





lose: unfind ... loose: untight







LegendaryActivity: 2870Merit: 1504lose: unfind ... loose: untight Re: Legitimate Uses of Bitcoins and the Dark Government March 29, 2015, 04:16:58 AM

Last edit: March 29, 2015, 04:29:26 AM by jbreher #5 Quote from: JeanW on March 28, 2015, 09:08:06 PM The evidentiary support for the search and seizures is the sworn testimony by U.S. Postal Inspectors that there are few legitimate reasons for Bitcoins; therefore, anyone with Bitcoins is mostly likely engaged in criminal activity.



Hey Jean - good to see you here. Is this from the search warrant? 'Few legitimate uses' doesn't seem to me to meet any sort of requirement for a search. Somehow, we the People need to find a way to hold these jackboots to a higher standard.



More directly related to your inquiry... Under the American system, if something is not explicitly illegal, then it is fully legal. If we the people budge on this fundamental principle, there is absolutely no Liberty.



Amy idea if the other raids the same day were based upon the same attestation?



Edit: the phrase 'denial of rights under color of law' seems to stand out to me. That's a crime too, isn't it? Hey Jean - good to see you here. Is this from the search warrant? 'Few legitimate uses' doesn't seem to me to meet any sort of requirement for a search. Somehow, we the People need to find a way to hold these jackboots to a higher standard.More directly related to your inquiry... Under the American system, if something is not explicitly illegal, then it is fully legal. If we the people budge on this fundamental principle, there is absolutely no Liberty.Amy idea if the other raids the same day were based upon the same attestation?Edit: the phrase 'denial of rights under color of law' seems to stand out to me. That's a crime too, isn't it? Anyone with a campaign ad in their signature -- for an organization with which they are not otherwise affiliated -- is automatically deducted credibility points.



I've been convicted of heresy. Convicted by a mere known extortionist. Read my Trust for details.

Chef Ramsay



Offline



Activity: 1568

Merit: 1001









LegendaryActivity: 1568Merit: 1001 Re: Legitimate Uses of Bitcoins and the Dark Government March 29, 2015, 04:22:41 AM #6 Quote from: abercrombie on March 29, 2015, 12:54:30 AM



If you're not white and need to send money to family in the 3rd world, Western Union and Moneygram have a nasty habit of increasing remittance prices to the poorest nations.



Remittances Remittances are a $500 billion market and a killer app for Bitcoin. I'm paraphrasing, but Andreas M. Antonopoulos said something like this in one of his many Youtube speeches: I was hoping that this would create a major bullish trend but it seems the market hasn't pounced on this niche to the fullest in any meaningful way. Just 5% would move this market in a major way, 10% even more and making everyone some serious coinage. Anywhere north of that plus additions of other related markets and it's moonish and more.

JeanW



Offline



Activity: 26

Merit: 0







NewbieActivity: 26Merit: 0 Re: Legitimate Uses of Bitcoins and the Dark Government March 29, 2015, 05:23:39 PM

Last edit: May 15, 2015, 04:51:58 AM by JeanW #7 Thanks to all for replying to my post. I have a young child so I can check in only once in awhile.



Even though my house was raided and my items taken, I am not allowed to see the sealed search warrant and the supporting documentation.



I have called and written the magistrate and I have called and written Customs and Border Patrol (yes, they have their hand in the till too) demanding to know the grounds for the search of my home and business and the seizure of my personal and corporate property.



After much complaining and protesting on my part, all I have been able to learn is that a US Postal Inspector serves as an expert witness and testifies that there are few legitimate purposes for Bitcoins.





elvizzzzzzz



Offline



Activity: 135

Merit: 100







Full MemberActivity: 135Merit: 100 Re: Legitimate Uses of Bitcoins and the Dark Government March 30, 2015, 08:13:54 AM #10 Hmmm .... I think the phrase Dark Government is more appropriate than Deep State in this instance.



Again, I'm sorry to read of your ongoing oppression by the state. The creation of laws that

are near impossible to comply with is the very definition of totalitarianism.



I'd point out that it is impossible to prove a negative. This fact goes to the basis of all law,

for example, innocent until proven guilty. Not much help though.



I'd suggest getting some of the law enforcement people from the Silk Road case into the

witness box to testify to the fact that the US Government is selling bitcoin. Then challenge the

prosecution to define which action by the State is deemed by the State to be illegal, and

why action against that part of the State is or is not pending.



Don't get me started on all the other things the Government does that are beyond questionable.

countryfree



Offline



Activity: 2534

Merit: 1038



Your country may be your worst enemy







LegendaryActivity: 2534Merit: 1038Your country may be your worst enemy Re: Legitimate Uses of Bitcoins and the Dark Government March 30, 2015, 10:56:23 AM #11 This story is absolutely frightening. I thought sealed search warrants were only for terrorists! I suggest to get in touch with the Bitcoin Foundation. This is the official voice of BTC , and explaining the world what's BTC is part of their mission. They should be able to help.

If you're looking for a trading/lending place, better avoid Poloniex, as it socializes losses. Learn more about it on this topic

kevinlarr



Offline



Activity: 31

Merit: 0







NewbieActivity: 31Merit: 0 Re: Legitimate Uses of Bitcoins and the Dark Government March 30, 2015, 03:16:18 PM #15



Anyway just a comment: seems to me that the seed of their argument's destruction is right there in their own wording, i.e. it says "FEW" legitimate uses.



FEW does not mean NONE.



IF there is even only ONE SINGLE LONE SOLITARY "LEGITIMATE" possible USE for bitcoins, then they ought to have ZERO -NO- NONE -ZIP- rights to seize them at all. Period. Full-Stop. End-of-Story.



Sure, IF the wording said "no legit uses" well okay then, maybe they have something to argue.



But it says FEW... right? THEIR WORD?



So? They're admitting right there - by NOT saying "NONE" - that there are SOME!!!



You therefore shouldn't even NEED to make a list to enumerate them: all your lawyers really ought to need to do is get 'em to admit, in court, that "few" does not mean NONE.



Of course IANAL, but seems like a reasonable point to me. If I was on the jury and it was presented to me in this way, personally I'd agree with this argument 100% no question.



KEVLARR

Hi Jean, nice to see you here... I too contributed to the piggybank fund, hopefully we'll get it to $600 worth of BTC for Zoe (and, honestly, I'm hoping this aspect of the story will get some media play on your behalf, i.e. "Generous Bitcoin Community Replaces Girl's Money Stolen By Government Thugs" would probably be worth much more than just the $ for your daughter... newcomers to this part of the story please see this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=985596.0;all and kick in a couple bits if you can afford it!)Anyway just a comment: seems to me that the seed of their argument's destruction is right there in their own wording, i.e. it says "FEW" legitimate uses.FEW does not mean NONE.IF there is even only ONE SINGLE LONE SOLITARY "LEGITIMATE" possible USE for bitcoins, then they ought to have ZERO -NO- NONE -ZIP- rights to seize them at all. Period. Full-Stop. End-of-Story.Sure, IF the wording said "no legit uses" well okay then, maybe they have something to argue.But it says FEW... right? THEIR WORD?So? They're admitting right there - by NOT saying "NONE" - that there are SOME!!!You therefore shouldn't even NEED to make a list to enumerate them: all your lawyers really ought to need to do is get 'em to admit, in court, that "few" does not mean NONE.Of course IANAL, but seems like a reasonable point to me. If I was on the jury and it was presented to me in this way, personally I'd agree with this argument 100% no question.KEVLARR

elvizzzzzzz



Offline



Activity: 135

Merit: 100







Full MemberActivity: 135Merit: 100 Re: Legitimate Uses of Bitcoins and the Dark Government March 30, 2015, 06:41:35 PM #16

prior to the seizure.



http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-03-30/federal-agents-investigating-bitcoin-money-laundering-stole-over-1-million-bitcoin



"Bridges allegedly diverted to his personal account over $800,000 in digital currency that he gained control of during the Silk Road investigation. The complaint alleges that Bridges placed the assets into an account at Mt. Gox, the now-defunct digital currency exchange in Japan. He then allegedly wired funds into one of his personal investment accounts in the United States mere days before he sought a $2.1 million seizure warrant for Mt. Goxs accounts."



It might be worth following up some of the earlier transactions with government agents.

Hopefully, Burt has full records of the bitcoin that he held, and all the cash that was in the house,prior to the seizure."Bridges allegedly diverted to his personal account over $800,000 in digital currency that he gained control of during the Silk Road investigation. The complaint alleges that Bridges placed the assets into an account at Mt. Gox, the now-defunct digital currency exchange in Japan. He then allegedly wired funds into one of his personal investment accounts in the United States mere days before he sought a $2.1 million seizure warrant for Mt. Goxs accounts."It might be worth following up some of the earlier transactions with government agents.

Ron~Popeil



Offline



Activity: 406

Merit: 250









Sr. MemberActivity: 406Merit: 250 Re: Legitimate Uses of Bitcoins and the Dark Government March 31, 2015, 04:03:32 AM #18 Quote from: elvizzzzzzz on March 30, 2015, 06:41:35 PM

prior to the seizure.



http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-03-30/federal-agents-investigating-bitcoin-money-laundering-stole-over-1-million-bitcoin



"Bridges allegedly diverted to his personal account over $800,000 in digital currency that he gained control of during the Silk Road investigation. The complaint alleges that Bridges placed the assets into an account at Mt. Gox, the now-defunct digital currency exchange in Japan. He then allegedly wired funds into one of his personal investment accounts in the United States mere days before he sought a $2.1 million seizure warrant for Mt. Goxs accounts."



It might be worth following up some of the earlier transactions with government agents.



Hopefully, Burt has full records of the bitcoin that he held, and all the cash that was in the house,prior to the seizure."Bridges allegedly diverted to his personal account over $800,000 in digital currency that he gained control of during the Silk Road investigation. The complaint alleges that Bridges placed the assets into an account at Mt. Gox, the now-defunct digital currency exchange in Japan. He then allegedly wired funds into one of his personal investment accounts in the United States mere days before he sought a $2.1 million seizure warrant for Mt. Goxs accounts."It might be worth following up some of the earlier transactions with government agents.

I kind of thought about that when I saw the story as well. Trust in the government is at all time lows for a reason. If they think making an example of a few high profile people will stop us they are dead wrong. I kind of thought about that when I saw the story as well. Trust in the government is at all time lows for a reason. If they think making an example of a few high profile people will stop us they are dead wrong. ▓▓▓ BITMIXER.IO ▓▓▓ ▓▓▓ High Volume Bitcoin MIXER ▓▓▓