Those who argue that the Russian hackers gave Donald Trump an unfair advantage would do well to consider that the unfair advantage argument actually favors Trump over Clinton since

(7) By contrast, the “facts” produced by the mainstream press and “fact checkers” are contested, most notably that Trump is a racist, a misogynist, anti-gays, anti-Muslim, anti-Kahn family, anti-Mexican, anti-War hero, and anti-disabled people, and is wrong about stop and frisk.

(6) The facts exposed by the controversial hacks provided the American people with relevant information that Hillary was hiding, so the facts exposed by the hackers actually helped American voters to learn the truth about Hillary and her cohorts in the Democratic party.

(4) The mainstream press and fact checkers favored Hillary from before Day One of the political campaign; the controversial hackers began later;

(18) Trump didn’t even run many commercials on television until the last weeks of the campaign; Hillary blanketed television with hostile and untrue commercials for many months.

(17) Hillary supposedly had a highly sophisticated “ground game” with hundreds of workers organizing schemes to get out the vote in advance and on election day, while Trump didn’t have much of a ground game, and had to resort to relying on what was above the ground—grass-rooted enthusiasm to do what Hillary’s workers were getting paid to do.

(15) Democrats admitted, on tape, paying Hillary supporters to go to Trump rallies, often disguised as Trump supporters, to create disturbances and violence, implying that Trump supporters were undemocratic, rough and violent, when ironically Democrats were behaving this way, often for pay, and with the added aspects of not only financial incentive, but hypocrisy, and framing whole groups of honest citizens.

(14) In addition to the standard allegations of voting irregularities, this year a new and particularly heinous and egregious voting irregularity surfaced in multiple states: Voters in multiple states reported that after voting for Trump, their machines showed they had cast their votes for Hillary! This was corrected in some cases when alert voters noticed it in time, but it is not known how many times this occurred, was not noticed, and/or not corrected.

(13) The extremely partisan pro-Hillary multi-billionaire George Soros was permitted to invest in voting machines, a type of investment he was not known to have been involved in before.

(12) • \\The Latino population has increased more than any other group in the country in some parts of the United States, and the press has falsely presented Trump’s opposition of illegal immigrants to be opposition to ALL immigrants.

(11) Trump was accused of improperly opposing all Mexicans upon merely and quite reasonably and legally opposing having a judge of Mexican descent rule on a lawsuit involving Trump since many people falsely believe that Trump opposes all Mexicans (but the press gave a prominent lawyer a pass, some years ago, in the first World Trade Center bombing case, when he wanted the Jewish Judge Mukasey – later the attorney general of the USA—to recuse himself where the accused was an Arab).

(10) Trump was accused of racism for advocating law and order (while advocates of Black Lives Matter demonized the police and thereby discouraged them from doing their jobs and protecting blacks, whose lives are endangered in inner cities at the hands – and guns and knives – of fellow blacks far more than by white police officers killing blacks with no provocations).

(9) Liberals in the press and in universities and public schools favor diversity of color and gender, etc., but not of thought, and threaten the jobs, livelihoods, and lives of people who disagree in public; fortunately, they cannot control what happens in voting booths.

(8) Millenials and even most people born after World War II have been brainwashed by educators and textbooks dominated by liberals and discrediting conservatives and people who believe in the Bible and intelligent design;

(19) James Comey, the director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (the FBI) announced that no reasonable prosecutor would have continued the investigation of Hillary’s emails and alleged misdeeds (after listing some of Hillary’s most egregious prosecutable actions, and after taking note of some of her many major lies under oath, as to which many prosecutors promptly came forth and said they would have continued the investigation, leading inevitably to the formation of grand juries and indictments).

(20) The FBI deferred until after the elections, and did not close its investigation, of the Clinton Foundation’s “pay for play” policies that many prosecutors said were illegal, and would have justified racketeering charges that would have put their leaders in prison.

(21) The press generally didn’t challenge Hillary’s statement, at the third debate, that the Clinton Foundation was a model of efficiency and propriety by spending 90% of the funds it raised on actual charitable expenses, when its own tax forms were exposed to have indicated that the figure was closer to 6%, and revelations surfaced that much of this “90%” was spent on exorbitant salaries of Clinton cronies, expensive jet travel all over the world, wedding expenses for Chelsea Clinton, and living expenses of Chelsea Clinton. Plus many of the funds were channeled through a Canadian entity which permitted the Clintons to hide the identities of many donors.

(22) No actions were taken against Attorney General Loretta Lynch or former President Bill Clinton for their clandestine meeting at an airport a few days before the FBI was to issue a major ruling on the allegations against Hillary based on her emails.

(23) The FBI issued its decision exonerating Hillary Clinton only a day or two after interrogating her in clear violation of its procedures that required further analysis before issuing a decision, unless the fix was in, in advance.

(24) The FBI claimed to have analyzed 650,000 emails in less than 10 days in order to be able to repeat its bogus exoneration of Hillary 2 days before the election.

(25) The press generally played down the significant WikiLeak revelations, before the election, with repercussions on our national security, while playing up the personal allegations against Trump, and playing down the personal allegations against Bill Clinton, and Hillary’s actions against the accusers of her husband. Only after most of the other excuses of the Democrats for losing the election failed to gain traction did they come up with the sudden idea that the leaks were important and decisive.

(26) Martha Raddatz, one of the debate moderators, took issue with Donald Trump during the debate by defending the Obama administration’s position of advance disclosure of information about American strategy in Syria instead of simply asking questions as a moderator

(27) Another debate moderator, taking upon himself another improper role, the role of “fact checker,” incorrectly “corrected” Trump for advocating “stop and frisk” activities to save lives, incorrectly telling Trump and all of America that such activities were unconstitutional when Trump, even though not a lawyer, correctly showed he did his homework by pointing out that the “stop and frisk” law that was declared unconstitutional in New York was so identified only because of the way the procedure was applied in a particular instance, and even then the appellate court signaled it was poised to overrule this decision, the judge who had made this decision was taken off the case for cause, and the only reason the case wasn’t overturned was that the new mayor opposed stop and frisk procedures, so he discontinued the case in which they were ruled unconstitutional, but such procedures certainly take place in other jurisdictions when applied properly.

(28) Literally dozens of allegations against Hillary, over the years, went largely ignored by most of the members of the media and most of their followers, some of which were listed in a previous article by this author (See “Snopes, Politifact, & Other Fact Checkers Are Liberal Mouthpieces,” Canada Free Press, November 6, 2016).

(29) Political incorrectness – masquerading as political correctness – muzzled many supporters of Donald Trump

(30) Julian Asange, of WikiLeaks, denies that his source is the Russians, and demands the public revelation of the evidence that the source is the Russians, and the intent was to influence the elections, rather than simply to weaken or embarrass Hillary and the other Democrats who expected to win regardless of the hacked leaks.

Consider, as well, the following observations previously made by this author, all of which can be found by searching the archives of Canada Free Press for a series of his recent articles on the subject of the Trump candidacy:

Even if most gay people do not bother heterosexual people, some jurisdictions force some Bible followers, under certain circumstances, to serve these gay people or go to jail or lose their jobs and licenses just because of their interpretation of Biblical passages which have prohibited gay marriages throughout the centuries and the millennia and did so by American law and most international laws until after Barak Obama was first elected president, so punishing people for upholding principles held by Barak Obama and Hillary Clinton until recently – and the Bible even now—is wrong, and even insulting to Obama and Hillary, in a way.

Even if Trump insulted a disabled news reporter on one occasion for allegedly denying something Trump believed the reporter had said, and Trump made some kind of a motion with his hands, while insulting him, this did not constitute an insult of DISABLED PEOPLE, as a group, or even as individuals, because

The disability of that reporter did not involve the kind of hand motions Trump made, Trump used these hand motions when insulting perfectly healthy people who Trump criticized, such as Ted Cruz, Trump even used these hand motions when self-deprecating himself, so the allegation that Trump thereby was insulting disabled people is nothing more than a trumped up charge with no validity. Hillary and all others in the media and privately who accuse Trump of insensitivity to people with disabilities should apologize, especially if their accusations are based largely on this single incident.

Even if Trump indirectly insulted the mother of a Muslim veteran on one occasion, after the veteran’s father attempted to very directly and publicly humiliate Trump at the Democratic National Convention,

The alleged insult to Mrs. Khan was directed against Muslims in general for relegating their women to a place in the background, and if anything showed Trump’s sensitivity to the rights of women in general and was a criticism of Muslims for not giving women equal rights and an equal place in the sun; (Trump never insulted the son of the mother he most indirectly insulted. Trump did not insult the veteran’s father, either; Trump specifically praised the veteran in the family as a hero; the veteran’s father, it turned out, made a living helping aliens become citizens; the veteran’s father had ties to Hillary before the convention; the veteran’s father falsely accused Trump of never having sacrificed for his country, knowing that unlike most politicians, Trump could have lived out his life as a rich and powerful man, with a generally untarnished brand name worth millions if not billions in itself, but instead sacrificed his career and his time and energy – and possibly his successful business—by running for president to save the United States from its slide away from capitalism and away from various freedoms of speech and thought based on political incorrectness disguised as political correctness, and Trump risked his life and the lives of members of his family by becoming targets of violence and death threats.

Mr. Khan, Mrs. Hillary Clinton, and most members of the media should apologize to Trump for their distortions of what Trump said, and their fabrications of what Trump did not say.

Even if Trump originally called for a temporary ban on letting Muslims into the country until an effective system would be devised and implemented to ensure that predatory “lone wolf” and ISIS terrorists would not be let into the country,

Trump later revised his plan to temporarily ban people based on the COUNTRIES from which they emanate that are hotbeds of terrorism; the proposed ban is intended to be temporary; the proposed ban is not as sweeping as the permanent bans of Jews escaping the holocaust who sought refuge in the United States and were denied entry by President Roosevelt, a liberal Democrat who also interned American citizens of Japanese descent during World War II; Trump does not and never advocated interning Muslims in concentration camps in America, nor was the ban as bad as what President Carter, a Democrat did, when Carter not only did not let Iranians into the United States but deported Iranians, at some point, just because of their country of origin, something Trump never advocated. Trump encourages the intelligent policy of increasing intelligence in this country to reduce the number of people who would commit mass murder, with or without weapons of mass destruction, and by doing so,

Trump advocates saving the lives of innocent Muslims along with the lives of members of other religions and the lives of those who profess to observe no religion who believe that all the complex organisms, plants and animals in the world, and all of their complex DNA compositions and reproductive systems came about without intelligent design.

Even if Trump insulted John McCain by saying that he (Trump) preferred honoring soldiers who were not captured,

this was not an insult of soldiers who were captured, but simply a statement that a person who performed an act of heroism, such as the Khan soldier referred to above, deserves more acclaim than a person who happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time, when fighting for his country, and was captured for this reason. Trump immediately declared that McCain was indeed a hero, right after making the original comment that Trump immediately realized would be misinterpreted and distorted. McCain actually became a hero not so much for being captured but for refusing to accept an offer of freedom unless he would insult America or be freed without his comrades in arms. Trump also felt that McCain didn’t do enough to help other veterans.

Above all, even if Trump insulted these categories of people and more, Trump’s policies in favor of free enterprise and freedom of speech and in favor of all the Amendments to and protections of the U.S. Constitution and Trump’s positions against terrorists and criminals and repressions of freedom of thought would benefit all of the categories of people Trump allegedly insulted far more than the insults might have hurt them or their successors and supporters.