They’re going to demand answers from Pace and a plan to return the Bears to the playoffs, but I don’t think they’re going to get out the extra-wide push broom and sweep people out of Halas Hall. You must look at the big picture and the dynamics within the organization when considering if a move will be made. I’m not defending Pace’s record with first-round draft picks, and the Trubisky pick looks particularly damaging. Free agency is hit and miss, and the Bears have made good moves and bad in that area. As far as extending players such as the offensive linemen you referenced, the Bears got team-friendly deals with Leno and Massie. Keep in mind how much it would cost to sign starting-caliber tackles in free agency —significantly more than they paid to keep those players. Long’s situation was marred by injuries that could not be predicted. The goal for the Bears is sustained success, and unless you’re the Patriots, who just won the AFC East for the 11th consecutive season, it’s a very difficult to achieve. Keep in mind where the Bears were when Pace was hired. He’s going to be three or four games above .500 over the last two seasons after Sunday’s game in Minnesota. He’s going to have an important offseason ahead of him with two years remaining on his contract. He can’t undo the Trubisky pick, and if the Bears cannot find a way to win in 2020, that mistake could doom him. But I don’t believe a change will happen this offseason. Another factor many clamoring for a GM change are overlooking is the fact Nagy remains under contract for three more years. It’s often difficult and problematic to hire a GM to come in and run a team with the mandate he has to keep the coach. How often do those forced marriages work out? Firing Pace now and hiring a new GM with Nagy under contract through 2022 creates another dimension that is less than ideal.