When conducting historical research, no detail is too small. The interpretation of events and the analysis of language are tools that can unlock the meaning of a text. This paper deals with the use and meaning of the word "apostasy" in Bede’s Ecclesiastical History of the English People. This has been done by comparing primary source texts such as the Hebrew Old Testament, the Theodosian Code, and Gildas's Destruction of Britain. Upon examining these texts, it becomes clear that many scholars have incorrectly labeled several of the kings in Bede's account as apostates. This detail may seem small while held up to the entirety of Bede's account, however, it is not. When small details are overlooked or misinterpreted, entire texts can be deemed unreliable or inconsistent. Since Bede’s Ecclesisatical History constitutes one of the few primary sources of information we have of Britons and Anglo-Saxons from the 7th century, this paper highlights how important it is to listen to the author. Paying close attention to the words an author uses is one of the best tools of historical research. By doing this, the reader can gain an accurate understanding of the text and its intended purpose.

Apr 14th, 9:45 AM

Apr 16th, 10:44 AM

The Meaning of Apostasy in Bede’s Ecclesiastical History of the English People

Billiard Room

When conducting historical research, no detail is too small. The interpretation of events and the analysis of language are tools that can unlock the meaning of a text. This paper deals with the use and meaning of the word "apostasy" in Bede’s Ecclesiastical History of the English People. This has been done by comparing primary source texts such as the Hebrew Old Testament, the Theodosian Code, and Gildas's Destruction of Britain. Upon examining these texts, it becomes clear that many scholars have incorrectly labeled several of the kings in Bede's account as apostates. This detail may seem small while held up to the entirety of Bede's account, however, it is not. When small details are overlooked or misinterpreted, entire texts can be deemed unreliable or inconsistent. Since Bede’s Ecclesisatical History constitutes one of the few primary sources of information we have of Britons and Anglo-Saxons from the 7th century, this paper highlights how important it is to listen to the author. Paying close attention to the words an author uses is one of the best tools of historical research. By doing this, the reader can gain an accurate understanding of the text and its intended purpose.