A downtown condo resident considered by some to be the neighbour from hell will soon be seeking a new address.

In an agreement reached on Friday, lawyers for Natalia Korolekh and the Toronto Condominium Corp. No. 747 agreed that she — and her 150-pound Rottweiler Chinia — will be gone from their upscale downtown condo this fall.

The court appearance before Justice Katherine Corrick came exactly one month after another Superior Court justice gave Korolekh three months to sell her townhouse in a 30-unit complex near Bay and Bloor Sts.

Condo lawyers had originally said they would be using Friday’s court date to seek an enforcement order, to make sure Korolekh complies with the original order for her and Chinia to vacate her tony digs.

The mood in the courtroom on Friday between Korolekh’s lawyer, David Strashin, and condo lawyer, Ryan Treleaven, was amicable and business-like, a far cry from the acrimony that marked the stay of Chinia and Korolekh in the townhouse complex.

Korolekh, 41, a stockbroker, and condo residents were not present in court.

Strashin and Treleaven are scheduled to re-appear before Corrick on Dec. 1 to assure her that the agreement is honoured, and that Korolekh and Chinia are long gone from the condo.

On Aug. 17, Korolekh was ordered by Superior Court Justice Michael Code to put her condo up for sale.

Strashin and Treleaven declined to comment on an agreement they reached on Friday, except to say that Code’s order still stands.

“The order is still in effect,” Strashin said on Friday.

Earlier this month, condo tenants sought an enforcement order of the original order after it appeared Korolekh was flaunting the court.

A deadline for removal of Chinia passed two weeks after the original order, with the muscular dog still on the premises and the condo still off the market.

It’s highly unusual for a judge to order the sale of a condo unit, but condo board members argued it was a particularly drastic case, noting that Section 117 of the Condominium Act prohibits residents from permitting or engaging in dangerous activities.

The push for eviction was bolstered by statements from nine neighbours, which depicted Korolekh as someone with a propensity for racist and anti-gay slurs, loud music, intimidating threats and attacks that included “egging” homes, poisoning a neighbour’s plants, throwing gravel and stones, and striking a fellow resident in the throat.

The condo board applied to have Korolekh ousted from the townhouse complex on July 19, 2009, alleging she was in violation of Section 117 of the Condominium Act. They also said Korolekh failed to comply with an earlier request to stop her inappropriate conduct and remove her dog from the home.

It’s more common for a condo board to pursue mediation or arbitration before resorting to legal action.

Code ordered the sale of the townhouse, without mediation, because of what he called Korolekh’s “bald denials of all the allegations” and her failure to respond to compliance requests.

Loading... Loading... Loading... Loading... Loading... Loading...

Code also ordered Korolekh to pay $35,000 to her condo board. According to court documents, the dog was used to “frighten and intimidate” others in the townhouse complex.

Korolekh had originally argued that she was the target of a “campaign of harassment” launched by the condo board after she asked for defective windows to be replaced.