As computers’ processing speeds grow ever faster, they are approaching the limits of their electronic components. More speed requires additional power and smaller, denser chips, but miniaturization inhibits heat dissipation. Fiber-optic cables already transmit information encoded in light faster and more reliably than electrical cables can carry electronic signals. If computers also processed information as light instead of electronically, they could boost computational speed and mitigate the excess heat generation that besets electronic circuits as they become faster and smaller.

1 Nat. Photonics 4, 261 (2010). 1. H. J. Caulfield, S. Dolev,, 261 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2010.94 Switching from electrical to optical computing has other clear advantages.In addition to faster signal propagation and less heat generation, optical signal processing is also inherently parallel. To understand why, consider imaging with a lens. The light intensity in the back focal plane is the spatial Fourier transform of the original signal. Performing the same Fourier transform electronically would require the function value at each point to be calculated sequentially, but with optics all points are evaluated simultaneously.

Researchers are developing materials and devices that may one day lead to practical optical computing technologies. Many of them manipulate light in the same way that switches and logic gates direct electronic signals. Those switches and gates would then be assembled into larger, multifunctional networks. But there’s no reason the strategies used in light-based computers have to mimic those of conventional computers, and other approaches target devices designed to perform specialized functions in ways that could surpass electronics.

2 Science 363, 1333 (2019). 2. N. M. Estakhri, B. Edwards, N. Engheta,, 1333 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw2498 Nader Engheta at the University of Pennsylvania and his collaborators have now built a device that solves integral equations using light.Their metamaterial block repeatedly manipulates a microwave input signal until it reaches a steady state that represents the equation’s solution. Although the device is not yet reconfigurable or programmable, it is smaller than those using other optical processing schemes and has the potential to solve integral equations much faster than a conventional computer.

Designing a device Section: Choose Top of page ABSTRACT Designing a device << Adaptations and reconfigu... References 3 et al. , Science 343, 160 (2014). 3. A. Silva, 160 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1242818 4 et al. , Science 361, 1004 (2018); et al. , Nat. Commun. 8, 15391 (2017). 4. X. Lin, 1004 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat8084 T. Zhu, 15391 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15391 Engheta first proposed using metamaterials for electromagnetic signal processingin 2014. He envisioned layered blocks whose varying permittivity and permeability would perform a mathematical operation on the incoming signal such as taking a derivative or integrating. Other groups have used different strategies to tackle optical signal processing,but metastructures have the potential to form smaller devices and be incorporated into circuits. They also process signals nonlocally: The input signal scatters through the device and affects the output at every point in the function’s domain, which allows the metastructure to solve global problems like integrals. g u = I in u + ∫ a b K u v g v d v . Known as Fredholm integral equations of the second kind, they are linear integral equations that arise in many fields of science and engineering, such as antenna theory and quantum perturbation theory. 5 5. A.-M. Wazwaz, Linear and Nonlinear Integral Equations: Methods and Applications, Springer (2011). g u —the quantity to be solved for—appears on both sides of the equation, so the researchers applied an iterative strategy. The input signal I in u passes through a metastructure that integrates the signal over a kernel, K u v , whose form reflects the integral’s underlying physics. The integrated signal leaving the metastructure is directed back in as the input for the next integral step. Eventually the output signal reaches a steady state, which is the solution g . The approach works in principle because the wave scattering in the metamaterial is mathematically equivalent to multiplication between a matrix operator and an input vector. The new device developed by Engheta’s group does more than perform a mathematical operation—it solves equations. The researchers focused their attention on equations of the formKnown as Fredholm integral equations of the second kind, they are linear integral equations that arise in many fields of science and engineering, such as antenna theory and quantum perturbation theory.The function—the quantity to be solved for—appears on both sides of the equation, so the researchers applied an iterative strategy. The input signalpasses through a metastructure that integrates the signal over a kernel,, whose form reflects the integral’s underlying physics. The integrated signal leaving the metastructure is directed back in as the input for the next integral step. Eventually the output signal reaches a steady state, which is the solution. The approach works in principle because the wave scattering in the metamaterial is mathematically equivalent to multiplication between a matrix operator and an input vector. 1a N waveguides at the bottom direct electromagnetic signals into and out of the metastructure. Each waveguide contains a coupling element (orange squares) with two coaxial cables, one to introduce I in and another to track the device’s progress by measuring the output signal g . The researchers monitor the process using only a small fraction of the signal that returned to the coupling elements; the rest of the signal is directed back into the metastructure for repeated processing. Each waveguide handles a discrete value of u in the integral’s domain. Figureshows a schematic of the device. The large, patterned region represents the metastructure and its varying dielectric constant. Thewaveguides at the bottom direct electromagnetic signals into and out of the metastructure. Each waveguide contains a coupling element (orange squares) with two coaxial cables, one to introduceand another to track the device’s progress by measuring the output signal. The researchers monitor the process using only a small fraction of the signal that returned to the coupling elements; the rest of the signal is directed back into the metastructure for repeated processing. Each waveguide handles a discrete value ofin the integral’s domain. The instructions for evaluating an integral over a particular K are encoded in the metamaterial’s structure. In particular, the researchers used an algorithm to translate a scattering matrix corresponding to the integral into a dielectric-constant distribution for the metastructure. But the fact that the kernel is hardwired into the device doesn’t mean the device only solves one equation—changing I in produces a different solution g . 1b λ = 6.85 cm in air. Although the simulated metastructures had continuously varying dielectric constants, for simplicity the real device contained only two materials—polystyrene and air—and used kernel structures that Engheta described as “Swiss cheese.” But there’s nothing special about those materials. Selecting different or multiple dielectrics would just change the geometry of the device. After Engheta and colleagues confirmed through simulations that their strategy works, they built the device shown in figurethat solved equations using microwaves of wavelength= 6.85 cm in air. Although the simulated metastructures had continuously varying dielectric constants, for simplicity the real device contained only two materials—polystyrene and air—and used kernel structures that Engheta described as “Swiss cheese.” But there’s nothing special about those materials. Selecting different or multiple dielectrics would just change the geometry of the device. 2 N = 20 match the theory more closely. The researchers tested their device with an input signal at each of the five waveguides and measured the amplitude of the steady-state output. Their results, shown for the center waveguide in figure, matched expected theoretical results and simulations. Although using only five waveguides simplified the experiments, the coarse discretization caused some deviation from the theoretical result. That problem is not inherent to the technique though: The same metastructure design also works with more waveguides, and simulation results using= 20 match the theory more closely. For a simulation of an input signal propagating through the device, see the online version of this story. Download Original Video (.7 MB) https://aip-prod-streaming.literatumonline.com/journals/content/pto/2019/pto.2019.72.issue-6/pt.3.4222/20190619/media/pt.3.4222.mm.original.v1.,965,773,645,.m4v.m3u8?b92b4ad1b4f274c70877518513abb28b8b0db634e771f26024783d4ab149ad9b64b693b3741051d24e14dec621cf4ec1cdca5211ce0317eb8fc3ddff841cf53c38c497c932364426f85d3e40b9cac5c0bdc7991cd5b15fcedd34c29fc0d3e0555fb93cb7c46d06af99c950e534b668ff0768b9d1180b9380fd4e2e654a8514515ddb4178548c7279978d3d4f5c64cd40b4fece0b080f334efea783a913a139b1f60d67c840cdff