Unfortunately, mine does not, although I believe they are more open to it than in the past. Back in 2011, when given the opportunity to narrow some excessively wide streets, our then (and now former) city planner presented a photo of a street in winter, fire trucks parked along each side, with a ladder truck seemingly struggling to get past. The photo was shot at a skew angle, with the response trucks parked at odd angles, doctoring the scene to make it appear that the ladder truck was stuck. It was sad, but effective, propaganda that effectively stalled any reform.

Of course, Vince Graham demonstrated mathematically the power of the grid to provide a mind-boggling number of routes to any scene. That is true even when your fire chief decides to park in a way that blocks the street. In terms of access, a narrow grid will always be safer than a wide cul-de-sac, the latter having only one way in and out.

And, of course, all of this assumes that fire trucks come in only one size. They don’t. We dealt with that one a long time ago, documenting how fire fighting equipment has grown in response to our wide streets, not the other way around. Do we size our equipment for the city we want or do we size our city for the equipment we want? The latter is vastly more expensive, but big trucks are fun. (I was a truck driver in the Army and appreciate the good times that come from driving a big rig.)

Interestingly, the desire for big that infects American firefighting mentality is also broadly seen in city maintenance departments. I’ve repeatedly been told that streets must be wide to accommodate the plows, but the plows must be wide to handle the streets. Big seems to be the only size municipal snow plows seem to come in. Well, big or ginormous.