As faithful readers have knowledge of, I am no friend of intelligent design. You would think that this alone would make PZ Myers, professor of evolutionary genetics at U of M, friendly to my research. But no one can do! Recently I politely asked Myers what he thought of my research on Evolution (or EvoDevo):

@pzmyers But what do you say about arguments against evolution? I give one here: https://t.co/JEON0M1oPw — Noted Scholar (@notedscholar) October 2, 2015

Unfortunately for him but fortunately for Honesty in Science, he proceeded to go on a Twant:

Total rubbish. I’m a mutant, you’re a mutant, everyone is a mutant. I’ve got a wife & 3 kids. QED, you’re wrong. https://t.co/ViUS6YI1MU — PZ Myers (@pzmyers) October 2, 2015

And:

Para #1 is all about you laughing at evolution. Para #2 is you demonstrating total ignorance of the science.. https://t.co/iyofS1KE0c — PZ Myers (@pzmyers) October 2, 2015

And:

Para #3 is you spinning your misconceptions into a stupid scenario. The whole thing is bullshit. Aren’t you proud? https://t.co/iyofS1KE0c — PZ Myers (@pzmyers) October 2, 2015

Now, in my original research into this question, I pointed out that the following conjunction

(1) Evolution happens via mutant descent;

and

(2) Mutants are negligibly likely to reproduce

are logically inconsistent. Because (2) is inconvertibly disputeless, (1) must be false, and hence evolution has serious holes (which E.O. Wilson has already shown, BTW). I have also discovered moral objection to evolution here.

Now it is worth noticing that Christianity “Peter” Klingenberg and his colleagues have shown in their work, “Morphological Integration and Developmental Modularity,” that the existence of mutants is doubly unlikely in the first places, because if there were mutants, than morphological integration would disintegrate into ashes. This is unsurprising in light of E.O. Wilson’s (I think?) “Convalescing Theory”, according to which mutated “alleles” break down or “convalesce” only when they share the same originating genomes, which is exceedingly (read: very) unlikely.

But what about PZ’s LOGIC? We can ignore his latter two Tweets, because they merely add hominem to insults. But he does say one thing of interest: “I’m a mutant, you’re a mutant, everyone is a mutant. I’ve got a wife & 3 kids. QED, you’re wrong.” First, the “QED” (sic): what follows from this is only that PZ’s wife and kids, and I/me, are/am mutants. But it does NOT follow that I’m wrong. Why not? Think about it! i never said that mutants themselves cannot meet other mutants and reproduce. It’s true that they can’t, but it’s not what I said. So it turns out that PZ has refuted a blog made of straw. I suspect this will damage his Twitter follow-rate, though in the days of Trump mania, one cannot be sure!