“Pointing to the letter, she said using the defence of consent suggests the departments don’t understand how ‘a young person of 13 or 14 does not have the capacity to consent in a situation like that.'”

Nonsense. They understand very well. They just were paralyzed by fear of being accused of “Islamophobia” and “racism.” They were willing to sacrifice Britain’s girls, and its future, to preserve their professional reputations from attacks by the likes of Nick Lowles and Fiyaz Mughal.

If Britain were remotely a sane society today, Lowles, Mughal, and other Leftist and Islamic supremacist leaders who for years stigmatized as “racist” those who called attention to Muslim rape gang activity would be forever discredited, and all the officials responsible for ignoring Muslim rape gang would be removed from their positions and forever barred from holding another position of responsibility. But if this were done, virtually the entire political class of Britain would be removed from power. That wouldn’t be a bad thing at all, but that’s why it isn’t going to happen.

“Prosecutors told 13-year-old Telford grooming victim’s family they couldn’t prosecute because she had consented to sex,” by Cheyenne Roundtree, Mailonline, April 1, 2018 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):