RATIONALE BEHIND NEW ZEALAND PSYOP I have translated the New Zealand PSYOP campaign into the standard metrics of an advertising campaign, which implements a specific layout of goals, objectives, strategy, tactics—with each element working to compliment, advance and achieve the ultimate goal of the campaign.

This might explain the agenda of the far left globalist democrat and how the New Zealand operation fits into the bigger picture. It’s what I would do if I was a God-hating, sexually schizophrenic, liberty fearing Leftist—which thankfully I am not.

The leftist campaign may unfold as follows:

THE GOAL: Political takeover of the United States

OBJECTIVE: Neutralize Right-Wing, Conservative Republican Christian base of President Trump

STRATEGY: Brand Right-Wing, Conservative Republican Christians as violent extremists threatening civilized society.

TACTIC: Generate false-flag events where Right-Wing, Conservative Republican Christians are blamed for acts of violent extremism, such as shootings, bombings, staged protests, government building takeovers (i.e., Malheur Refuge, etc.).

TACTIC: Orient Department of Justice and all law enforcement agencies to elevate white, right-wing, conservative republican Christians to top of list of domestic threats and terrorist list, and consequently increase incidents of “stop, investigate, and arrest” actions against this group.

TACTIC: Increase red-flag gun confiscation laws by including the justification for this action will include allegations of participation in white, right-wing, conservative republican Christian suspect groups or activities.

TACTIC: Conduct Democrat controlled House Committee hearings on white, right-wing, conservative republican Christians and directly associate President Trump with rhetoric and beliefs and agenda of this white, right-wing, conservative republican Christians terrorist group.

THE WHO

Who benefits? Certainly not right-wing, christians-conservative republican white Americans—or white people in general. Certainly not Trump, as the shrill cries by leftist Democrats calling for blood, punishment, and repentance by him for seemingly speaking rhetoric that conveniently resembles the alleged rhetoric of this kind of shooter—even though the manifesto allegedly written by the shooter does not claim support for conservatism. Indeed the manifesto seems more likely written by a leftist inarticulately trying to channel or inhabit the language and ideas of conservatives, albeit deceptively.

The winners in this always seem to be the political-police-military industrial complex who get expanded budgets, more powers, less limitations, and more license to control and abuse the civilian population; as well as the media—which like vampires feed on the fear of their audience through Nielsen ratings. And who controls the media? From what I’ve seen by many sources and analysts, judging by most ethnic- religious-political identity charts—and I say this with no phobic prejudice or bigotry in mind—it is always a Jewish-Israeli establishment of Ivy league leftists. That’s just how it is—good or bad. The next question becomes, “Why is that?” Perhaps we can explore that another day. For now, let’s stay on the shooting event and evidence of fakery.