RE:"discretionary decisions by policymakers are increasingly giving some companies advantages over others."





Discretionary decisions are really being made to support the major global private investment funds. There is all kinds of distracting narrative focused on GDP and interest rates. The real issue is who is holding the wealth and where?



https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2018/11/28/richest-countries-world-2018-top-25/38429481/



The US may have a high GDP, however, any wealth created by the work effort of the citizens/workers on the soil of the US territories do not have critical access to the wealth. They are in fact creating wealth for others primarily the private Muslim sovereign investment funds, a bit to the public sovereign funds of nonMuslim European, and Asian wealthiest nations. Do notice that there is a difference due to the citizen rights and ownership limitations of the differing sovereign fund groups. Pretty important: The discretionary decisions are not due to any action close to policy. The discretionary decisions are for the reward of specific private investment groups regardless of any and all effects to any of the workers that demonstrate certain performance levels as measured by GDP statistics, and measured cumulative economic results. 401K funds and employee investment funds based on public corporate shares are only funds that are holding debt, that includes Vanguard.



Checkout the list. I didn't come up with it, I just copied it here, and am sharing the data conclusions. GDP activities do not mean any wealth goes to the citizens whose work effort indicate a global gross domestic product output.