5 Shares 0



5

0







Men pretending to be women support a Gorgon pretending to be human for president. Nor does the syzygy end there: group and Gorgon also share a set of initials.

“The nation's largest LGBT rights organization, the Human Rights Campaign”—or HRC—“announced that it has endorsed Hillary [Rodham] Clinton”—another HRC—“for president,” the Washington Post trilled. For anyone blissfully ignorant of PC acronyms, “LGBT” translates as “Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender.” What, no pedophiles or enthusiasts of bestiality? Seems a tad hypocritical that perverts who sue us for “discriminating” when we exclude them nonetheless exclude their fellow pervs.

At any rate, “HRC President Chad Griffin” felt he (yeah, I’m guessing here at Chad’s gender du jour) had to explain HRC’s choice of HRC: after all, the latter has wavered in her advocacy of debauchery as much as she has on everything else. Her vacillation is especially egregious when compared with Bernie “Socialist” Sanders’ devotion to deviants—but of course, Bernie can’t win, or so his unprincipled constituency at the HRC assumes.

“While they fight to take us backwards,” Chad therefore opined, leaving “they” vague and doubly sinister, “Hillary Clinton is fighting to advance LGBT equality across our nation and throughout the world." Hmmm. That would explain the pantsuits, all right. But “The Don’t Ask Don’t Tell policy that barred openly gay people from serving in the U.S. military and the Defense of Marriage Act, which defined marriage as between one man and one woman, both became law under her husband’s administration. Clinton herself supported DOMA through her 2000 campaign for Senate in New York, and while she backed away from the law during her 2008 run for president, she did not announce her support for same-sex marriage until 2013.” That doesn’t sound like “fighting to advance LGBT equality across our nation,” let alone “throughout the world,” does it?

But then people who sport male appendages don’t sound like women, either, though both HRCs now insist otherwise. Alas, since homo sapiens’ genes stubbornly retain those inconvenient XX or XY chromosomes despite all cosmetic or surgical changes, “transgenders” remain the sex they were born.

But cellular evidence isn’t the only witness to reality: the proof becomes so overwhelming that it should convince even them when they attempt to reproduce. Yes, men who say they’re women can’t bear children, so they leave that to the women who claim they’re men. And it’s a growing trend among the hopelessly confused: last year alone, the UK’s Daily Mail reported that three men hiding behind skirts and make-up nonetheless fathered children on three women named Fernando, Ryan, and Nick.

Are these people so deranged, superficial and foolish that they presume clothes make the man, and literally, too?

Now, it’s no skin off our nose if a guy wishes to pretend he’s a gal or vice versa. Heck, if he wants to “present” as a ‘69 Trans Am, a bunch of bananas, or a cuckoo-bird, who cares? Ditto for sodomites and lesbians. Whatever wickedness they practice privately is their own affair. Yet these degenerates endlessly bray about their sin, as if life’s raison d’etre is perversion. Pssst, Deviants: no one wants the sordid details on whom you’re bedding and how. It’s a toss-up which is more offensive: your exceedingly poor taste or your staggering narcissism.

But of course the matter doesn’t end there. Even more than our attention, these freaks crave power over us. Power to rob us so that we must subsidize their folly (“Nick,” she who considers herself a man though she bore two sons, complains, “When it comes to [transgender] surgery in the U.S, most of the time you have to pay out of pocket. …it's a lot of money…” Cue the taxpayers and Obummercare), power to compel us to embrace their depravity (“Nick” continues, “The U.S. is behind with equality for people like us … We still have a large amount of people who are against who we are and the two of us having children together. We have received some pretty hateful comments from people in the U.S.” Poor baby. And so terribly illiterate that she doesn’t understand “equality” and “approval” are entirely different and separate concepts), and power to squelch our dissent from so unjust an arrangement.

In a word, they seek the same political power Progressives such as Hillary Clinton obsessively pursue. Progressives believe none of us are competent to hire the right applicant for a job: we require the EEOC and umpteen other bureaucracies minutely supervising us lest too few black lesbians work in our companies. Likewise, Big Daddy Government is far better able to decide on a desirable tenant for our rental properties than we silly serfs. Hillary Clinton said as much when accepting the other HRC’s endorsement: “Too many LGBT Americans still face discrimination—in employment, in housing, in education, in health care—because of who they are or who they love.”

See? We can’t be trusted to determine even such simple matters as our children’s associates. Those who say, “I don’t want a sodomite teaching my 6-year-old son” or “I think my daughter—a sophomore in high-school this year—should change for gym without boys masquerading as girls undressing next to her” haven’t decided as both HRCs prefer. Ergo, neither totalitarian respects them, lusting instead to control them—and us.

Fortunately, the HRCs richly deserve one another. Hillary’s crimes, whether the massacre of 76 people she ordered at Waco, her corrupt trading in cattle-futures, Filegate, Whitewater, Travelgate,Benghazi, Email-gate, ad infinitum, ad nauseam, are too extensive and notorious to rehash here. But if this wily politician with no principles except her own ambition is the one on which the sexually deluded and deviant have pinned their hopes…well, that’s about as much poetic justice as this fallen old world affords.