100% agree. I definitely don’t think that Ironwood should have told the council, let alone an entire city. Especially when they still don’t know about the most significant piece of info: Salem’s immortality. Why is Ozpin a manipulator for saying, “Hey there’s this woman we need to take care of” without divulging the immortality aspect to a group of volunteers, but Ruby and Oscar aren’t manipulators for demanding that Ironwood do the same to a city of civilians who did not sign up for this? Even if I did miraculously agree that this was a good decision, yes, those are still totally different contexts. Which is something everyone should understand given that (again) we see another case of this in the exact same volume: It’s supposedly a good thing now for Ruby to keep the same secrets and tell the same lies, despite the fact that it was supposedly a bad thing for Ozpin to keep those secrets and tell those lies mere days ago. The context has supposedly changed. I use “supposedly” so often because I also think that application of what decision is “good” vs. “bad” should be reversed—Ozpin was smart not to tell a bunch of teens he barely knew whereas Ruby was dumb not to tell an ally once she realized his doomed plan was hurting people—but it nevertheless demonstrates that circumstances change. What was the “right” decision for one person at one time isn’t necessarily the same for another.