Reconsidering History: 40,000-Year-Old Asian Cave Paintings Stun Archaeologists

The world’s earliest known cave painting wasn’t found in Europe, but in Indonesia.

A study said the painting of an animal, discovered on the island of Borneo, dates back at least 40,000 years, which is even older than the famed cave paintings of France and Spain.

“The oldest cave art image we dated is a large painting of an unidentified animal, probably a species of wild cattle still found in the jungles of Borneo,” stated study lead author Maxime Aubert, an archaeologist and geochemist at Griffith University in Australia. “It is now the earliest known figurative artwork,” according to USA Today.

This finding adds to the mounting view that cave art – one of the most important innovations in human cultural history – did not arise in Europe as long believed. 由 USA TODAY 发布于 2018年11月7日周三

The paintings are about 4,000 years older than the next oldest, which were found in Sulawesi.

Regarding the content of the painting, “We think it wasn’t just food for them – it meant something special,” Aubert said.

“Whether this is a coincidence, the result of cultural convergence in widely separated regions, large-scale migrations of a distinct Eurasian population, or another cause remains unknown,” the study said.

Meanwhile, “who the ice age artists of Borneo were and what happened to them is a mystery,” said study co-author Pindi Setiawan.

The paintings found in Sulawesi in the 1950s were initially dismissed as being about 10,000 years old, as scientists believed they couldn’t survive in tropical climates.

“The paintings were made with the natural mineral pigment ochre – probably ironstone haematite – which the hunter-gatherers ground to a powder and mixed with water or other liquids to create paint. Long ago, the walls and ceilings of the caves might have been covered with images that provide a window into the minds of the Ice Age occupants,” according to an article in The Guardian in 2014, which include a hand-print.

Looking at the paintings in 2014, the details on the animal drawings are “really, really well-made,” Aubert said in a phone interview from Jakarta, Indonesia. “Then when you look at it in context that it’s really 40,000 years old, it’s amazing,” according to The Associated Press.

Paleoanthropologist John Shea of Stony Brook University in New York, who wasn’t part of the study, called this an important discovery that changes what science thought about early humans and art.

Before this discovery, experts had a Europe-centric view of how, when and where humans started art, Aubert said. Knowing when art started is important because “it kind of defines us” as humans, he said.

Shea said in an email: “Inasmuch as many of us would have difficulty replicating such paintings, they [the people who painted in the Indonesian caves] may even have been our superiors in this respect.”

The Associated Press contributed to this report.