Dental remains of Homo floresiensis excavated during 2002–2004 at Liang Bua, Flores, Indonesia, consist of one partial maxillary dentition, two nearly complete mandibular dentitions, and four isolated teeth. We present here morphological descriptions of all these specimens and report aspects of their dentition, occlusion, and oral health condition. This dental assemblage represents probably five but possibly four or six individuals. These different individuals share similar dental characteristics, supporting the view that the Liang Bua H. floresiensis assemblage represents a single population. We also reassess the previous claims for primitive and modern aspects of the H. floresiensis teeth. The previous studies reached conflicting conclusions: some researchers claim that these teeth are fully modern, whereas others highlight premolar and other morphologies that suggest their direct evolutionary link with the African earliest form of Homo or Australopithecus rather than with H. erectus . Neither of these views are supported. The H. floresiensis teeth exhibit a mosaic of primitive, derived, and unique characters, with the reported primitive aspects broadly comparable to the morphologies observed in H. erectus sensu lato . Although a more comprehensive comparative analysis is needed to fully illustrate dental morphological affinities of this dwarfed hominin species, we find no grounds for the hypothesis that H. floresiensis originated from the small-bodied, primitive hominins such as H. habilis sensu lato .

In this paper, we provide detailed morphological description for all the dental materials of H. floresiensis excavated during the 2002–2004 field seasons at Liang Bua ( Morwood and Jungers, 2009 ). Most of the mandibular teeth of H. floresiensis have been described by Brown and Maeda (2009) , but we here describe these materials again based on our own observation of the original specimens and high-resolution micro-CT scans that were not available to the previous researchers. We also reassess the previous claims for primitive and modern aspects of the H. floresiensis teeth.

High-resolution CT scan was obtained using the microfocal X-ray CT system TX225-ACTIS (Tesco Co.) in April 2009 at the University Museum, The University of Tokyo ( Kaifu et al., 2011 ). Prior to the scan, the system was calibrated with known size phantoms. Linear measurement error in a horizontal plane was less than 0.1% ( Kubo et al., 2008 ). Original scans were taken at 130 kV and 0.20 or 0.17 mA with a 0.5 or 1 mm thick copper plate prefilter to lessen beam-hardening effects. Other scanning parameters included a 512 × 512 matrix, 50 or 80 microns pixel size, and 50 or 80 microns slice thickness and interval. Avizo 8.0 software (FEI Visualization Sciences Group) was used for segmentation of the enamel and the dentine to visualize the EDJ surfaces.

Tooth crown measurements follow the methods described in Wood (1991) . Both the measured and wear-corrected values are reported for mesiodistal (MD) crown diameters. Length of a root was measured on the buccal surface (from the cervical midpoint to the root tip) except for the lingual root of the upper molar where the length was taken on the lingual surface. A single observer (Y.K.) measured the original specimens with reference to isolated plaster casts of each tooth, using a Mitsutoyo digital sliding caliper with pointed tips. When necessary, the thickness of dental calculus deposit was estimated to obtain the original crown diameters. Cervical diameters were measured either by a sliding caliper (by Y.K.) or from the CT scan (by R.T.K.) following the methods of Hillson et al. (2005) . Severity of occlusal wear was scored by the categories (0–8) proposed by Smith (1984) .

Mandibular dentition of LB6/1. Occlusal views (a). Buccal (b) and lingual (c) views of the right dentition. Mesial view of left C 1 (d). Mesial (upper image) and apical (lower image) views of left P 3 (e). Mesiolingual view of left P 4 (f). (e) and (f) were taken when Y.K. disassembled the left mandibular body for conservation purposes. Scale = 10 mm.

Mandibular dentition of LB1. Occlusal views (a). Buccal views of the anterior parts of the right (b) and left (c) dentitions. Lingual views of the anterior parts of the right (d) and left (e) dentitions. Distal view of the left P 3 root (f). Buccal view of the right molars (g). Lingual view of the left molars (h). (e) and (f) were taken when we disassembled the left mandibular body to correct its reconstruction. Scale = 10 mm.

Maxillary dentition of LB1. Occlusal views (a). Buccal (b) and lingual (c) views of the right dentition. Buccal (d) and lingual (e) views of the left dentition. Micro-CT scan indicates that right M 3 was congenitally absent in this individual. Note that both right and left P 4 s are rotated bilaterally. Scale = 10 mm.

Morphological Description

Table 1 reports our measurements of the crowns and roots. These measurements are in most cases slightly lower (0.1–0.9 mm, or more in a few cases) than those reported by Brown et al. (2004) and Brown and Maeda (2009). It should be noted that there is substantial asymmetry in the degree and pattern of occlusal wear in LB1. This is because of the horizontally twisted (rotated) occlusion between the maxillary and mandibular dentitions in this individual, which was probably caused by posterior positional (deformational) plagiocephaly (Kaifu et al., 2009, 2010).

Different individuals exhibit similar dental characters to each other unless noted otherwise. Anatomical terminology mostly follows Johanson et al. (1982). The following abbreviations are used:

MD = mesiodistal(ly)

BL = buccolingual(ly)

LL = labiolingual(ly)

CEJ = cemento–enamel junction

EDJ = enamel–dentine junction

IPF = interproximal facet

Mmr = mesial marginal ridge

Dmr = distal marginal ridge

ASUDAS = Arizona State University Dental Anthropology System (Turner et al., 1991)

Incisors

The specimen is complete except for partial exfoliation of the cementum from the root surface and a small damage at the root tip. Extensive occlusal wear has eliminated most of the crown, leaving a flat, slanting occlusal surface that reaches the CEJ on the distal face but not on the mesial face. Mesial and distal IPFs are not present. Small patches of dental calculus are attached around the CEJ.

Viewed occlusally, the preserved cervical portion of the labial enamel surface is nearly straight, suggesting a limited labial MD convexity of the crown when unworn. In mesial or distal view, the labial cervical enamel is flattened so that it continues straight to the root surfaces. The remaining small portion of the lingual enamel suggests that the gingival eminence was weak. The ASUDAS scores for shoveling and tuberculum dentale are not available due to the wear.

At the cervical level, the cross-sectional shape of the root is a MD compressed, rounded triangle with the mesiolingual face slightly wider and more convex than in the distolingual face. The root is short (our estimate of the labial length is 12–13 mm), stocky, and retains its thicknesses for 4 mm above the CEJ before tapering toward the broken tip. This root length is largely comparable to the mean root length (distance between the root apex and the center of the cervical plane) of a recent modern human sample reported by Le Cabec et al. (2013) (12.9 mm).

I2

This tooth is not represented in the currently available Liang Bua collection. Although Brown et al. (2004) inferred that the I2 was much smaller than I1 in LB1, this view is not supported by the partially preserved, moderate-sized right I2 alveolus seen in a CT section (Figure 5a).

Figure 5 CT sections of the dental roots of LB1. The level for each section is indicated in the image above the relevant section. Upper left (sections a and b): left maxillary dentition. Upper right (sections c and d): right maxillary dentition. Lower left (sections e and f): left mandibular dentition. Lower right (sections g and h): right mandibular dentition.

The former is complete and is in the alveolus of the LB1 mandible. LB6/14 is an isolated tooth that was not described by Brown and Maeda (2009). It has a slight damage at its root tip. Its size, morphology, wear, and preservation suggest that the tooth is from the LB6/1 mandible, but this possibility cannot be ascertained due to the damage on the latter. Incisal wear is extensive in both specimens. The areas of the CEJ and exposed root surfaces are in part covered by thin layers of dental calculus.

The preserved basal portions of the crowns do not show marked lateral flaring. Viewed mesially or distally, as in the I1, the labial cervical enamel is flat and continues straight to the labial root surface. A shallow but distinct vertical furrow is present on the labial crown face of each specimen. It reaches and disappears at the CEJ. This may indicate that the crown had assumed double-shoveling when unworn. On the lingual face, the gingival eminence is weak and almost absent.

The root can be examined directly (LB6/14: Figure 4) or with the CT scan (LB1: Figure 6b). The root is MD compressed and has a vertical furrow on the distal face. Viewed mesially or distally, the lingual (LB6/14) or both the labial and lingual (LB1) outlines are markedly convex so that the maximum LL diameter (5.8–6.0 mm), which measures around the middle of the root length, considerably exceeds the LL diameter at the CEJ (5.0 mm). The root lengths, 14 mm (LB1) and 12.2 mm (LB6/14), are largely comparable to the mean values for various modern human samples (11–13.4 mm: Suwa et al., 2011, Table 3).

Figure 6 CT sections of the LB1 mandibular incisor roots. Sagittal (top) and horizontal (right) sections are shown for right I 2 (a) and left I 1 (b). The lower left image for each tooth is a surface rendered image of the labial side, which indicates the levels of the sections (vertical and transverse lines). Me = mesial, Di = distal, La = labial, Li = lingual. Note the convex labial and lingual root outlines similar to LB6/14, the isolated I 1 shown in Figure 4.

The three specimens are in their alveoli. They are complete except for damages at the root apices of LB1. Wear is moderate (LB1 right, LB6/1) to extensive (LB1 left). The left tooth of LB1 exhibits a ‘stepped’ occlusal wear in which the lingual half is worn more heavily than the labial half. The CEJs are in part covered by thin layers of calculus.

Basic anatomy is similar to I 1 , although I 2 is larger and its labial crown surface faces slightly distally. Viewed labially, the crown is slender MD. On the unworn cervical half of the labial face, a vertical furrow seen in the I 1 s does not develop, but the surface is flattened MD. As in the other incisors, the labial enamel and root surfaces continues straight with little swelling of the cervical enamel. On the smooth lingual face, the gingival eminence is weak. Basal parts of the Mmr and Dmr are barely recognizable near the worn incisal margin of LB6/1, although the wear prevents ASUDAS scoring for this trait.

CT scan of LB1 (Figure 6a) indicates that its root form is generally similar to that of the I 1 s. The MD compressed root presents a longitudinal groove on the distal face. The labial root face shows marked vertical convexity, and LL diameter reaches its maximum around cervical one-third of the root length. The root length of the LB1 I 2 , 14.3 mm, is largely comparable to the mean values for various modern human samples (12–14.7 mm: Suwa et al., 2011, Table 3).

Canines

1: LB1 (right and left: : LB1 (right and left: Figure 1

Both teeth are in their sockets. Each of them is complete except for a transverse crack in the middle of the root (visible in the CT scan). Occlusal wear is extensive, leaving only 1–2 mm of the mesial enamels. The right tooth is less worn, particularly on its labial side, so that its occlusal surface is strongly sloping lingually. Mesial IPF is lacking. The crown contacts with the P3 at the distal aspect of its Dmr. An intermittent band of calculus covers the CEJ or root surface, particularly on the labial side.

The severe wear obscures the labial crown contour, but a low distal shoulder is evident in the less worn right tooth. Viewed occlusally, the crown outline is asymmetric with the convex mesiolabial and flattened distolabial aspects. On the less worn right tooth, a MD broad, rounded gingival eminence dominates the lingual aspect. It does not project lingually over the cervical line, but smoothly continues to the prominent basal part of the lingual median ridge. Dmr is a weak, thin line restricted near the crown’s distal shoulder. The labial crown face exhibits slight wrinkling.

CT scan indicates that the root is single and robust, with its labial (right tooth) or lingual (left tooth) face showing marked vertical convexity. The cross section is MD compressed, oval with the labial section broader than the lingual (Figure 5a–d). The lengths of the root, 20.3 mm (right) and 19.8 mm (left), are greater than the modern human average (16.1 mm) and are slightly shorter than the means for Neanderthals (22.5 mm) and the Early Pleistocene H. erectus from Sangiran, Java (21.5–21.6 mm) (Le Cabec et al., 2013).

The four specimens from two individuals are complete and in their alveoli. Approximately half (LB6/1) or slightly more (LB1) of the crown heights have been lost by wear that produces largely flat occlusal surfaces. Mesial and distal IPFs are present in the less worn LB6/1 C 1 s, but mesial IPFs were probably lost in LB1 by wear.

The distal crown shoulder is preserved on the relatively unworn left C 1 of LB6/1. Its tip is located 3.5 mm above the CEJ, and is distinctly lower than the worn mesial shoulder that measures >5 mm. Apart from this asymmetry, the wear prevents assessment of labial crown contour. Viewed occlusally, the gently convex buccal crown contour is nearly symmetric but the lingual contour is asymmetric due to the distally located gingival eminence. The labial face is characterized by fine, longitudinal wrinkles and a slight thickening of the cervical enamel (evident in the calculus-free cervical enamels of LB6/1: Figure 3b). There are no longitudinal grooves along the mesial and distal aspects of the labial crown surfaces. The lingual face is dominated by a broad, prominent median ridge that continues smoothly from the gingival eminence. Weak lingual Mmr and Dmr are represented by flattened areas beside the median ridge, and the mesial and distal lineal foveae are no more than shallow depressions.

CT scan (Figure 5e, g) indicates that the root is single and relatively robust, with vertically convex lingual face and vertically straight labial face. The root lengths for LB1, 17.2 mm (right) and 16.4 mm (left), are comparable to the mean values for various modern human samples (13.7–18.2 mm: Suwa et al., 2011, Table 3).

Premolars

3: LB1 (right and left: : LB1 (right and left: Figure 1

The specimens are complete except for a crack at the root of the left tooth, which has dislocated its crown slightly mesially and occlusally. The left tooth is worn flat with dentine islands of moderate sizes exposed on the two cusps. On the less worn right tooth, the lingual cusp (protocone) is worn flat whereas the buccal cusp (paracone) remains high. Mesial and distal IPFs are present, although the left tooth has lost its contact with the P4 due to the dislocation. A thin layer of calculus covers the cervical half of the buccal crown surface of the right tooth. Calculus is present, but less marked on its lingual face and on the left tooth.

The occlusal outline, partially obscured by the interproximal wear, is ovoid with MD diameters slightly greater across the buccal than the lingual crown. The crown is largely symmetrical MD, with the lingual cusp tip shifted slightly mesially. Detailed morphology of accessory occlusal ridges is unknown due to the wear, but some features are evident. The longitudinal groove is completely worn away, whereas the anterior and posterior fovea partially remain unworn. On the EDJ surface, there is a sharp crest that connects the two cusps (Figure 7a), indicating the presence of a well-developed transverse crest when the crown was unworn. The low Mmr and Dmr are incised by grooves emanating from the mesial and distal foveae, respectively. On the relatively vertical and smooth buccal face, the area around the CEJ is obscured by the calculus deposition, but the presence of a narrow enamel band along the cervical line is evident on the left tooth. Mesial and distal buccal grooves are absent although the area of the former is flattened in the left tooth. The lingual face is also smooth and steep.

Figure 7 Occlusal views of the EDJ surfaces of the right P3 (a), P4 (b), M 1 (c), and M 2 (d).

CT scan (Figure 5a–d) indicates that the root has a buccal component and a lingual component that are extensively fused together to form a BL broad, plate-like root complex. The buccal component is longer than the lingual one. Each component has its own, single root canal in the right tooth, whereas the canals are partially connected to each other in the left tooth. A vertical furrow intervenes between the two components on the mesial and distal root faces. The furrow is deeper on the mesial than on the distal faces, and is more marked on the right tooth.

4: LB1 (right and left: : LB1 (right and left: Figure 1

The right tooth is complete. In the left tooth, enamel is chipped off from the distobuccal corner of the crown, and the root is cracked so that the crown is dislocated slightly occlusally. Both teeth are rotated ~90° and their original buccal faces orient mesially in the tooth rows. Occlusal wear is heavier on the left than on the right tooth. Both teeth contact with their mesial and distal adjacent teeth, although the mesial side of the left tooth presently lacks the contact due to the postmortem mesial dislocation of the P3. Calculus deposition is marked on the buccal but much less on the lingual sides.

The occlusal outline, partially obscured by wear, is elliptical with nearly equal paracone and protocone cusp breadths. The protocone cusp tip is located slightly mesially to the crown’s midline (lingually in the dentition because of the rotation). The worn occlusal enamel surface of the left tooth is featureless except for a dentine exposure at the paracone tip. On the less worn right tooth, the mesial half of the longitudinal groove has been worn away but its distal half as well as the anterior and posterior foveae remain intact at least partially. On the EDJ surface, there is a sharp crest that connects the two cusps (Figure 7b), indicating that a well-developed transverse crest was present when the crown was unworn. A short accessary ridge extends from the paracone cusp tip toward the posterior fovea. The low, incomplete Dmr remain unworn, whereas the Mmr is obliterated except for its buccal (mesial in the tooth row) segment. Both the buccal and lingual faces rise steeply from the CEJ. Mesial and distal buccal grooves are absent on the less worn right tooth.

CT scan (Figure 5a–d) indicates that the root is largely similar to those of the P3s. The buccal and lingual components of similar lengths are extensively fused to form a BL broad, plate-like root complex. A longitudinal furrow separating the two components is deeper on the mesial face than on the distal face.

LB2/2 is an isolated tooth. The other four teeth are in their sockets. All the five specimens are complete. Flatly or concavely worn occlusal surfaces are slightly (LB1, LB6/1) to strongly (LB2/2) beveled distally. Moderate occlusal wear exposes a large dentine island on the buccal cusp of each specimen. In the tooth row, the P 3 s of LB1 are slightly rotated so that their mesiobuccal surfaces contact with the canines, whereas the LB6/1 P 3 s contact with the canines at their pointed mesial end of the mesial occlusal ridge (thus these P 3 s are not rotated, in contrast to the condition in LB1). Mesial and distal IPFs are also present in the isolated LB2/2, but the former is located on the mesiobuccal surface, indicating a slight rotation as in LB1. The buccal and lingual faces of these teeth are variably covered by dental calculus with the most severe cases observed in LB1.

Viewed occlusally with the mesial and distal protoconid (buccal cusp) ridge oriented transversely, the crown is a distorted fan composed of a gently (LB1, 6/1) or moderately (LB2/2) convex and MD long buccal aspect and distally tapering lingual crown. It is extensive both MD and BL, although the MD diameter for LB1 reported by Brown and Maeda (2009), 10.4 mm, is an overestimate irrespective of crown orientation. The prominent buccal cusp supports MD extensive mesial and distal protoconid ridges (evident from the preserved enamel and thick lines of exposed dentine). The lingual cusp (metaconid) is small and is situated distally, shortly mesial to (LB6/1) the crown’s distolingual corner. The two cusps are connected by a strong transverse crest that runs diagonally toward the crown’s distolingual section, almost in line with the cervical long axis. Mesial to this crest and lingual to the mesial protoconid ridge, the entire mesiolingual segment of the occlusal surface slants and faces mesiolingually to form an extensive, sloping, generally flat but finely wrinkled enamel surface. This beveled surface extends inferiorly to the level ~1 mm short of the CEJ. The short, poorly developed Mmr and the shallow, linear anterior fovea are restricted to the mesial aspect of this sloping surface. On the distal crown, the talonid is represented by a low, featureless Dmr that is restricted to the distal crown margin and delimits a BL oriented, linear posterior fovea. The buccal face slopes lingually and curves moderately (LB1, LB6/1) or strongly (LB2/2) in a vertical section. There are no distinct mesial/distal buccal grooves, but the entire buccal face is irregularly wrinkled. A 1 mm wide band of enamel develops along the cervical line on the buccal face of LB1 (evident on the calculus-free left side: Figure 2c). The buccal cervical line dips inferiorly so that the crown is deeper on the buccal than on the lingual aspect.

Based on low-resolution CT scans, Brown and Maeda (2009) described that LB1 and LB6/1 had two roots arranged in a ‘MB + D’ pattern (a circular mesiobuccal root and a larger plate-like distal root) defined by Wood et al. (1988), and the isolated LB2/2 a Tomes’ root with a deep mesiolingual cleft resulting from fusion of the original mesiobuccal and distal components. Our high-resolution CT scan and direct observation (Figure 2f) of LB1 as well as direct observations of LB6/1 (Figure 3e) and LB2/2 (Figure 4) confirm these assessments. The two root components of LB1 and LB6/1 are closely set to each other, particularly in their apical portions (Figure 3e (lower), Figure 5f, h). The cervical outline of the H. floresiensis P 3 root is elliptical with its long axis being almost in line with the transverse crest on the crown. The root lengths (10.7–13.5 mm: Table 1) are shorter compared to the mean values for various modern human samples (12.7–17.0 mm: Suwa et al., 2011, Table 3).

LB15/1 is an isolated tooth that was not described by Brown and Maeda (2009). The LB6/1 P 4 are in their alveoli, although the mesial root of the left tooth is now visible at the break of the mandible. The three specimens are complete. Occlusal wear is moderate, and the less worn LB6/1 right tooth still retains some cuspal relief. All three teeth have mesial and distal IPFs that reach the occlusal surfaces. Small patches of calculus remain on the CEJ and enamel surfaces.

The crown of LB15/1 is larger than LB6/1, and is probably so compared to LB1 where the space between its left P 3 and M 1 measures <7 mm. The occlusal contour is asymmetric with slightly protruding mesiobuccal and distolingual corners. The buccal and lingual cusps are located mesially, and are connected by a well-developed transverse crest (evident in LB6/1 and may be so in the worn LB15/1). The Mmr is incised by a shallow groove emanating from the anterior fovea (observable only in the right tooth of LB6/1). The talonid basin is large, situated at a low level, and supports a linear distal fovea and a thick Dmr. The Dmr continues to the crown’s distolingual corner, smoothly flexes mesially to extend toward the lingual cusp tip. Mesial and distal buccal grooves are absent on the smoothly convex buccal crown face. The lingual face is unremarkable.

The remaining alveolus for the LB1 left P 4 (Figure 5f, e) and mesial aspect of the LB6/1 left P 4 (Figure 3f) indicate that these two teeth are categorized as Tomes’ root with a deep mesiolingual cleft. The partial fusion of the LB6/1 root is not clearly recognized in Figure 13 of Brown and Maeda (2009) who erroneously reported that this tooth shows MB + D root pattern. The isolated LB15/1 has a single, robust root (Figure 4). Its MD diameter is greatest at the cervix (5.9 mm) and tapers toward the apex, whereas the large BL diameter remains almost the same in its cervical half (7.7–7.2 mm). A shallow vertical groove is present on the distal root face, but the mesial face is generally convex. The root lengths (13.2–14.3 mm: Table 1) are comparatively shorter than the mean values for various modern human samples (12.9–16.5 mm: Suwa et al., 2011, Table 3).

Molars

1: LB1 (right and left: : LB1 (right and left: Figure 1

The specimens are complete except for cracks at the root of the left tooth. The lingual half of the occlusal surface is severely worn, resulted in the exposure of a MD continuous, concave dentine surface in a form of ‘cupped wear.’ The buccal half is less worn particularly in the right tooth. BL extensive mesial and distal IPFs are present. The enamel surface and CEJ are partially covered by thin calculus deposits, particularly on the buccal face of the right tooth.

The occlusal contour is a BL elongated square with a wider mesial segment that results from lingual projection of the protocone base. The wear has eliminated most of the occlusal ridge and groove structures, but the remaining grooves indicate that both the right and left teeth had four major cusps. On the right tooth, much of the buccal transverse occlusal groove remain. On the left tooth, the same groove can be traced only by an indentation on the buccal occlusal margin and two tiny, shallow pits near the crown midpoint, the lingual one of which probably corresponds to the central fovea. Near the distal occlusal margin and lingual to a tiny dentine exposure at the metacone apex, a small pit and a short groove remain. The latter is probably a part of the groove demarcating the metacone and hypocone. The prominent distolingual corner of the crown suggest strong development of the hypocone (ASUDAS grade 4 or 5). The buccal face is obscured by the calculus but the presence of a 0.5 mm wide enamel band is evident along the cervical enamel. The smooth lingual crown face is marked by a lingual projection of the protocone base, but no expression for the Carabelli’s trait.

CT scan (Figure 5a–d) indicates that the mesiobuccal, distobuccal, and lingual roots are divergent from each other. The lingual face of the lingual faces distolingually (Figure 1a). The above described lingual swelling of the protocone base is apparently associated with this ‘twisted’ root orientation.

2: LB1 (right and left: : LB1 (right and left: Figure 1

The crown on the left side is dislocated slightly buccally at a large crack on its root. A small crack is also present in the distobuccal root of the right tooth. Otherwise, the two specimens are complete. The occlusal surface is worn flat with dentine exposed at two cusps on the right (protocone and hypocone) and left (protocone and paracone) teeth. Distal IPF is present only on the left tooth. It measures 2.2 mm both BL and vertically. A few thin or small patches of calculus remain mainly on the buccal crown face of the right tooth.

These are four-cusped teeth. The occlusal outline is a trapezoid with broader mesial section as well as distally extended hypocone but reduced metacone, which is more marked in the right tooth. Much of the occlusal enamel structures have been lost by wear. The buccal transverse occlusal groove, which runs lingually and mesially, is clearly (right) or partially (left) recognizable. The central fovea is represented by a shallow pit near the center of the left tooth, but no such feature remains on the right tooth. Other occlusal groove/ridge structures are not evident, although our CT-based examination of the EDJ topology indicates that tiny pits on the lingual aspect of the right tooth represent the lingual transverse occlusal groove. A 0.5 mm enamel band is present along the cervical line of the buccal face. Although the lingual face shows marked lingual projection mesially as mentioned above, the entire surface is smooth and Carabelli’s feature is absent.

CT scan (LB1 only: Figure 5a–d) indicates that the root structure is largely similar to the M1s. There are three roots (mesiobuccal, distobuccal, and lingual) and the lingual root exhibits distal twisting. However, compared to the M1 condition, these roots are less divergent, the level of split of the three roots is more apical, and the mesiobuccal and lingual roots are fused extensively in the left tooth.

M3

Morphology of this tooth can be inferred only from the left alveolus of LB1 (Figure 5a). Its small, conical form suggests that this tooth had a much smaller crown than M1 and M2 (Brown et al., 2004).

These teeth are in their sockets. Small portions of enamel have been chipped off at the mesiolingual and distobuccal corners of the left tooth of LB1 either before or after the individual’s death. Otherwise, the four specimens are complete. Mesial and distal IPFs are present in all of the teeth. Asymmetric wear pattern in LB1 (less worn lingual cusps of the right tooth, loss of mesial and distal enamels in the left tooth, etc.) is primarily because of the unbalanced, rotated occlusion in this individual (Kaifu et al., 2009). Calculus depositions are seen around the buccal and lingual CEJs. It is extremely thick and extensive on the lingual face of the right tooth of LB1. A filled hole on the buccal face of the mesial root of the LB6/1 right tooth was made to take samples for DNA extraction.

The occlusal contour is a MD short, rounded square with slightly protruding mesiobuccal and distolingual corners. Much of the enamel surface structures have been worn away, but the partially remaining occlusal grooves, the arrangements of the exposed dentine patches, as well as the EDJ surface (Figure 7c, LB1 only) indicate that these are four-cusped teeth with no development of hypoconulid, Cusp 6, and Cusp 7. The lingual transverse occlusal groove, parts of the buccal transverse occlusal groove, and the mesial portion of the distal longitudinal groove (LB6/1 only) are traceable. A mesiobuccally oriented, short groove at the central fovea (evident on the right tooth of LB1 and possibly both teeth of LB6/1) suggest a substantial contact relationship between the metaconid and hypoconid. Entoconid is the lingually restricted, smallest cusp. Metaconid is also restricted BL, and the two buccal cusps dominate on the occlusal surface. At the buccal termination of the transverse lingual occlusal groove, the central fovea is shallow with no development of a deep pit. A sharp, high, and continuous crest connecting the protoconid and metaconid on the EDJ surface of LB1 (Figure 7c), which corresponds to grade 3 of Bailey et al. (2011: Fig. 4), strongly suggests the presence of a mid-trigonid crest before the wear (Bailey et al., 2011; Martínez de Pinillos et al., 2014; the definition of ‘mid-trigonid crest’ follows Martínez de Pinillos et al., 2014). A protostylid is absent in the LB1 right M 1 , and at least not evident on the moderately worn other M 1 s. There is a faint, narrow band (LB1) or swelling (LB6/1) of enamel along the cervical lines.

CT scan (LB1 only: Figure 5e–h) indicates that M 1 has plate-like mesial and distal roots that are distinctly separated from each other. The BL broad mesial root is bifid apically. The BL width of the distal root decreases apically. The mesial root lengths of LB1 (12.3–12.5 mm: Table 1) are shorter than the mean values for various modern human samples (13.2–14.9 mm: Suwa et al., 2011, Table 3).

The four specimens are complete. The lingual cusps are variably less worn and the original cuspal reliefs and groove patterns can be read to some extent. Mesial and distal IPFs are present, and some amounts of calculus deposition are seen, particularly on the lingual faces. A filled hole on the buccal face of the mesial root of the LB1 right M 2 was made to take samples for DNA extraction.

The occlusal outline is a rounded square with slight mesial projection of the protoconid and lingual projection of the entoconid base. These are four-cusped teeth. Two occlusal grooves demarcating the entoconid are preserved. Much of the other occlusal grooves have been worn away, but their positions can be restricted with reference to the anterior fovea (LB6/1), distribution of the exposed dentine for the protoconid and hypoconid (LB1 and LB6/1), the remaining groove between the metaconid and hypoconid (LB1), and the topology of EDJ seen in the CT scan (LB1). Cusp arrangement is similar to the M 1 s: Entoconid is the lingually restricted, smallest cusp. Metaconid expands slightly more buccally than the entoconid, but the two buccal cusps are more expansive BL on the occlusal surface. Metaconid and hypoconid contact to each other via a short occlusal groove in LB1, and this seems to be also the case for LB6/1. Cusp 7 assumes a form of a triangular depressed area immediately distal to the main occlusal ridge of the metaconid in LB1, whereas this structure is not clearly developed in LB6/1. The anterior fovea, evident in LB6/1, is a small, triangular notch that opens mesially. A sharp, high, and continuous crest connecting the protoconid and metaconid on the EDJ surface of LB1 (Figure 7d), which corresponds to grade 3 of Bailey et al. (2011: Fig. 4), strongly suggests the presence of a mid-trigonid crest before the wear (Bailey et al., 2011; Martínez de Pinillos et al., 2014). No deep pit develops at the central fovea as in the M 1 s. The distal longitudinal groove disappears before reaching the distal occlusal margin without forming a distinct posterior fovea. The buccal crown face is generally smooth except for a narrow, continuous enamel band stretching along the cervical line over the protoconid and hypoconid bases. The lingual face is vertically more convex compared to the M 1 condition.

CT scan (LB1 only: Figure 5e–h) indicates that the mesial and distal root components are fused along their buccal sides to form a short, cylindrical root complex with a C-shaped cross section. The mesial root length of LB1 (12.5 mm) is shorter than the mean values for various modern human samples (13.1–15.1 mm: Suwa et al., 2011, Table 3).

The four specimens are complete except for minor cracks at the root of the LB1 right tooth. The teeth contact with the M 2 s, although the LB1 M 3 s are bilaterally rotated ~30° so that their mesial faces orient lingually. A filled hole on the lingual root face of the LB1 left tooth was made to take sample for DNA extraction.

The occlusal contour is a rounded rectangle with the lingually protruded entoconid (LB6/1) or a pear-shape with the broader distal crown (LB1). These are four-cusped teeth. The occlusal groove arrangement is close to a ‘+’ pattern although metaconid and entoconid slightly contact each other. The longitudinal groove and the transverse groove are situated lingually and distally relative to the crown center, respectively, so that protoconid is the largest cusp. The mesial segment of the longitudinal groove incises the Mmr, whereas its distal segment does not reach the distal occlusal margin. The anterior fovea is a triangular pit opening mesially. The central fovea is not very deep, and there is no posterior fovea. Cusp 7 is defined as a triangular depressed area distal to the main occlusal ridge of the metaconid. A thin enamel band is expressed along the cervical line on the buccal crown face of LB1, whereas the same face is generally smooth in LB6/1. The lingual crown face is vertically more convex than in the anterior molars.

CT scan (LB1 only: Figure 5e–h) indicates that the M 3 of LB1 has a single, pyramidal, long root with a deep buccal cleft. The mesial root lengths of LB1 (15.8 and 15.1 mm) are greater than the mean values for various modern human samples (11.2–14.4 mm: Suwa et al., 2011, Table 3).

Dentition and occlusion

LB1

LB1 had a completed permanent dentition, but had lost all the maxillary incisors, left M3, right I 1 , and left P 4 postmortem (Brown et al., 2004). Brown and Maeda (2009) reported that their CT scans suggested the presence of a very small M3 odontome within the alveolar bone of the LB1 maxilla. Our micro-CT scan identifies no such evidence (the white materials behind the M2 in Figure 5a–d are probably dirt), indicating that this tooth was congenitally absent as reported originally (Brown et al., 2004). Brown and Maeda (2009) also inferred that the right P 4 was originally present in the jaw, but the right P 3 bears no distal IPF and a remnant of the P 4 or its alveolus is not observed in our CT scan (Figure 5g, h). We suggest that the right P 4 was congenitally absent and a single, BL elongated (4.1 mm wide) mesial IPF on the M 1 was a facet for the exfoliated dm 2 (Kaifu et al., 2009). The space between the right P 3 and M 1 has been reduced to 1.8 mm by mesial migration of the latter.

The maxillary dental arcade shape is described as nearly square with sharp flexion at the canines as seen in H. habilis, H. ergaster, and Sangiran H. erectus, but is different from the more rounded arcades seen in Kabwe and Zhoukoudian 13 (Kaifu et al., 2011). The close proximity between the right I2 and C1 alveoli evident in a CT section (Figure 5a) does not support the previous inference for a diastema in this individual (Brown et al., 2004). At variance with the previous report (Brown and Maeda, 2009), the Curve of Spee is not strong but weak after the correction of the original left row (Kaifu et al., 2009). Bilateral rotations are seen in the P4s (markedly), M 3 s (moderately), and P 3 s (slightly).

Kaifu et al. (2009) made a photographic reconstruction of the centric occlusion of LB1 primarily by matching the occlusal wear facets. The result indicated that the occlusion of this individual was horizontally twisted so that the left molars show a Class II relationship (the mandibular teeth are in a distal relationship with their normal maxillary opponents) and the right molars a Class III relationship (the mandibular teeth are in a mesial relationship with their normal maxillary opponents) (see their Fig. 2). This distorted occlusion is likely a result of the posterior deformational (positional) plagiocephaly, and is not indicative of severe developmental abnormality in this individual (Kaifu et al., 2009, 2010).

LB6/1

LB6/1 had a complete set of the permanent mandibular dentition, but the right and left I 1 as well as left I 2 were absent in their alveoli when the specimen was recovered. The length–breadth ratio of the dental arcade is similar to that of LB1 before it had been broken (Kaifu et al., 2011). The Curve of Spee is only slight (Brown and Maeda, 2009). No remarkable tooth rotation is observed. The occlusal wear pattern in this specimen indicates occlusion with undistorted, normal Class I relationship.

LB2/2

This individual is represented by a single P 3 . As mentioned above, the position of its mesial IPF suggests a slight rotation in the tooth row, as in LB1.

Oral health

There is heavy (LB1) or modest (LB6/1) calculus deposition, and the bone is resorbed in the molar regions of LB1 as described and illustrated previously (Brown and Maeda, 2009; Jungers and Kaifu, 2011). The other four isolated dental specimens (LB2/2, 6/14, 15/1, and 15/2) also exhibit some degree of calculus deposition, suggesting its commonality in H. floresiensis from the Liang Bua Cave. The heavy calculus and alveolar resorption in LB1 were probably resulted from the unbalanced, twisted (horizontally rotated) occlusion in this individual. Dental caries is not observed in any of the materials described here. No hypoplastic pits or bands are present on the enamel surfaces. Periapical abscess cavities are also absent in LB1 (maxilla and mandible) and LB6/1 (mandible). Previous claims that the oral health condition of LB1 suggests its agricultural subsistence (thus the individual is from a H. sapiens individual: Henneberg and Schofield, 2008) has been rejected by Jungers and Kaifu (2011).