The EU revolutionized the UK, now an opaque foreign sponsored counter-revolution is restructuring our democracy.

Since the 2016 referendum, with mounting corroboration of corruption and criminality by the Leave campaigns being progressively exposed, the government, hellbent on Brexit at any cost, has not only ignored the growing crisis but is now actively participating in its cover-up.

The whole thing is a mess; the illegal activities of Vote Leave and Leave.EU were conducted in darkness, making the investigations painstakingly difficult. The spotlight, that is shining on those responsible, spills on to those attempting to now shape Brexit, allowing us to witness the progression of what must be the greatest crime in British political history.

It all began with a needless device, a binary referendum whose result has divided the nation, paralysed the government and caused damage to our economy, calculated at having reduced growth of our £2.26 trillion economy by 2% before we actually leave the EU, a figure which significantly transcends the true amount we pay for EU membership. An act of madness when it has been demonstrated that EU membership has boosted our economy by 24%.

A direct consequence of the madness that has descended like a cloud over parliament, is that, for the first time in over seventy years, we’re witnessing the real prospect of food and medicine shortages, with the added bonus of anarchy on the streets and the deployment of the military.

It was all meant to be so simple, two options put to the electorate, two options designed to kill off the anti-EU distraction once and for all and placate both the Tory Eurosceptics and UKIP’s insurgency in one fell swoop; what could possibly go wrong?

Option one was to ‘Remain’ in a EU which has transformed this country from the sick man of Europe in the early 1970’s to the fifth largest economy in the world, the fastest growing in the G7, a main player in the world’s largest trading bloc whose citizens consequently enjoy some of the best personal and environmental freedoms, rights and protections anywhere on the planet and benefit from initiatives such as Europol, Euratom, Erasmus, and an open skies policy. All for a cost of just 1% of our annual budget.

Option two was to ‘Leave’ the EU and regain control of our sovereignty, our borders, our laws and our money along with deregulating our industries and leaving the common agricultural and fisheries policies behind, all which would apparently lead to more jobs, better pay, lower prices, better schools, better hospitals and the ability to trade on a better footing with the rest of the world – without the need to send £350m a week to Brussels, money which we could then spend on our own priorities.

The rest is now history, notwithstanding that option one offered tangible reality whilst option two offered a mixture of fantasy, lies and conflation, the government’s warnings were ignored, the Leave groups outperformed Remain and the electorate gave its verdict; they chose option two by a marginal amount in an advisory referendum.

With instigators Cameron and Osborne fleeing the scene, this marginal result was transformed into a mandate by the still unelected Theresa May government whose empty mantras, ‘Brexit means Brexit’ and ‘Strong and Stable’ couldn’t be further from reality.

It all sounds like the shenanigans in a banana republic, and, unfortunately, it is. Thirty months later, we are faced with the dawning reality that, having failed to tackle those who exploited the referendum process, they are now attempting to shape Brexit, attempting to shape the future of our country, not in the best interests of the people of the UK, but in the best interests of their paymasters.

With the publication of Theresa May’s 585 page draft EU ‘Withdrawal Agreement’ the reaction from the guilty has been both swift, extreme and telling.

The faux Machiavellian Steve Baker MP, with yet another cunning plan to distract May’s attention, rallied the ERG troops and attempted to launch a doomed leadership battle using Jacob Rees-Mogg as the leader of the rebels without a clue.

Simultaneously, on message pro-Brexit ERG MPs lined up to give interviews, the largely American neocon influenced Tufton St mafia were once again all over the media and backbench MPs David Davis and Owen Paterson, along with Shanker Singham, visited the United States as guests of the, Koch – Mercer family funded, neocon lobbyists, The Heritage Foundation.

The Heritage Foundation is one of the globe’s most influential neocon lobbyists for hire, its mission statement is to ‘promote public policies based on principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom and traditional American values‘ or to quote Inside Philanthropy: ‘Keep taxes on rich people low and make poor people get off their asses’.

This is to whom Davis, Paterson and Singham travelled to platform and reassure their hosts that their own low tax, small state, deregulated, off the shores of Europe Singaporean dream is still achievable, or should that be available, to the highest bidder.

And for deregulation read a bonfire of our current regulations surrounding food, health, welfare and environmental protections which every one of those Tufton St associated organisations want removed for one very simple reason, so that their funders can make more money – that is what lobbyists do.

David Davis, best known for his catastrophic and mendacious tenure as Brexit Secretary, is a lifelong free-marketeer and a former director of Tate & Lyle (now US owned by American Sugar Refining Group) that heavily sponsor events at the Conservative annual conference. He is a supporter of ‘Leave Means Leave’ and a strong campaigner for civil liberties, supporting Matthew Elliott’s ‘Big Brother Watch’ initiative based at 55 Tufton St.

Owen Paterson is an inveterate Brexiteer. The founder of yet another Tufton St based right-wing lobbyist, UK 2020, Paterson supported the Vote Leave group during the referendum and, along with John Redwood MP, founded the Eurosceptic and Vote Leave satellite, ‘Conservatives for Britain’ group whose apparent reincarnation is the Farage/Tice led ‘Leave Means Leave’ organisation which is based at, you guessed it, 55 Tufton St, and counts Paterson as a member of its ‘Political Advisory Board’.

A former employee of Squire Patton Boggs, Shanker Singham, a UK and US citizen, is a leading trade and competition lawyer. Along with Matthew Elliott, the head of Vote Leave, Singham parted ways with lobbyists Legatum in the spring of 2018, following adverse publicity over the apparent access Legatum had to government departments and ministers during the Brexit negotiations. Namely Boris Johnson and Liam Fox.

He then entered the revolving door at Tufton St, emerging in nearby Lord North St, and continued in a similar vein at that most opaque of organisations, über lobbyists, disguised as an ‘educational charity’, the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA), where he is director of their International Trade and Competition Unit (ITCU). Amongst its displays of social conscience, the IEA advocates privatisation of the NHS, zero hour contracts and the reduction of workers rights.

He is also Head of Trade at The Centre for Economic and Business Research (CEBR) and founder, chairman and CEO of The Competere Group, yet another lobbyist group for hire, engaging with governments, the media and industry.

Along with his extensive ties to the UK government, Singham is a cleared adviser to the United States Department of Commerce and, more importantly, a cleared advisor to The United States Trade Representative who is responsible for developing and recommending trade policy to the President of the United States, Donald Trump.

May’s deal is undoubtedly anathema to the both the ERG and this Tufton nexus; they have made it clear, they favour the ‘No Deal’ WTO terms scenario, as outlined by Economists for Free Trade (you guessed right again) spokesperson, Patrick Minford.

Under this scenario, there is no £39bn divorce payment, there is no transition period and Brexit, their vision of Brexit, would begin immediately at the moment of exit.

Watch Paterson in the above video, at 1:20 he states that the IEA has “come up with” a UK/EU free trade deal. We know from an earlier presentation given by the IEA in, September 2018, where both David Davis and Jacob Rees-Mogg spoke, that Singham has produced a model for a ‘Blue Peter’ style – here’s one I prepared earlier – UK/EU free trade agreement, which, amidst the no-deal chaos they claim won’t happen, in full knowledge that it will, they believe the EU’s negotiation position will be compromised and they will become desperate to sign anything; part of their deluded strategy to bring the EU begging to the table.

For an unelected, unaccountable, opaque organisation, that is quite a gamble, hypothetical business deals over with the wellbeing of 66 million in the UK and hundreds of millions in the EU if this madness spreads, but it has always been their longterm plan.

As Dr Martin Cohen opined in his most recent article on Brexitshambles:

Boris Johnson and David Davis resigned: not because they were losing the battle – rather it was because they had already achieved their purpose – steering the vital months of negotiation precisely nowhere.

With no transition, and therefore no restrictions, the UK would be able enter into a US trade deal, and once again, listening to Shanker Singham, the cleared advisor to The United States Trade Representative, someone appears to have been extremely busy; particularly when you examine the Federal Register from last month which confirms that it’s the administration’s intention to enter into negotiations with the UK for a US-UK trade agreement after the UK exits the EU on March 29th 2019 – now their panic makes sense.

This document confirms the stories circulating in the early part of 2018, originally reported by Greenpeace’s Unearthed, which suggested that the participants in an event organised by Daniel Hannan’s IFT, all right-wing neocon funded think tanks (lobbyists) and all, save the Policy Exchange, members of the Atlas network, an organisation originally set-up by the founder of the IEA to replicate its ideology around the world.

It would appear that this is an attempt to not only set, prime and frame the future agenda of Brexit, they’re attempting to deliver a ready made, ‘off the shelf’ agreement in order to curtail some, if not all, of the usual 3-4 year negotiating period.

It is hardly a secret why American business is keen on a trade deal with the UK; with lower production costs in their agribusiness, due to lower standards than those promoted by the EU, there will be plenty of unrestricted ‘free-trade’ opportunities for the US and plenty of pain for our home producers as their industry is put under pressure.

And with Theresa May already having dangled the healthcare carrot to US businesses, an enormous prize for the carpetbaggers who will be beating a path to our door come the end of March; if you fell for the propaganda over the big bad EU, you have no idea what’s in store with the US…..Jim Grace’s thread will give you a flavour.

Investor State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) clauses give multinationals the right to sue the UK taxpayer if HMG pases a law that harms their investment (eg banning fracking, or certain pesticides, or employment practices).

Cont — Jim Grace (@mac_puck) November 16, 2018

There are certainly a few flies in the ointment, and they explain the Brextremists palpable panic since May’s draft agreement was published.

Firstly, they don’t need May’s deal or any other deal, hence their robust, verging on maniacal, fixation of no-deal, poorly masked by the promotion of a deal unlikely to get through parliament prior to crashing out.

Secondly, they need their willing participant in the Oval Office, it’s difficult to say how long he’ll remain there, the heat is definitely on, but he likes nothing better than producing a rabbit out of the hat that, he will claim, “Makes America Great Again”.

Finally they definitely don’t need or want a second referendum; you can only fool people some of the time and they know they’re a busted flush.

It is scandalous that Brexit was sold to the electorate as a means for them to ‘take back control’ from an imaginary elite, and that its delivery was promoted as the ‘will of the people’ when it is increasingly evident that the people who have actually taken back control work for organisations funded by foreign elitists in and around Tufton St.

But not as scandalous as the government’s attempts to ignore the crime staring them in the face which involves the referendum result, those running Vote Leave and Leave.EU along with serving and former ministers who were involved in this #Brexitscam.

It is clear that members of May’s government, past and present, are either frozen like rabbits in the headlights of Johnson’s and Gove’s bus, not knowing how to extricate the country out of this mess, or they are complicit, just like the politicians who are pretending to work for us when they’re really working for opaque, foreign sponsored entities, masquerading as educational charities.

This madness needs to stop, before any new vote on anything, we need new laws that actually safeguard our democracy, we need better laws to protect us from ‘Fake News‘ but most of all we need the biggest public inquiry into the biggest scam in British history, and it needs to address all the questions May’s government won’t.

Here’s just a few starters for ten, feel free to join in.