For much of the fall, House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) made no secret of his plans for 2017: the conservative congressman was eager to put the White House under a microscope , investigating everything Republicans could think of. This, of course, came at a time when Chaffetz assumed, like nearly everyone else, that Donald Trump would lose and Hillary Clinton would be the next president.After Trump became president-elect, the Utah Republican found it difficult to change gears. On Nov. 9, literally the day after the election, Chaffetz said he intended to keep going after Clinton and her email server management anyway. Yesterday, as The Hill noted , he doubled down, saying he wants to keep investigating Clinton.

This is bonkers for a variety of reasons, but let’s focus on just two. The first is that Clinton, a private citizen who hasn’t held public office in nearly five years, didn’t actually commit any crimes . I realize that we’re all supposed to pretend clumsy I.T. practices in 2012 represent the year’s most critically important issue, and the political world’s obsession with email server management helped put an unqualified television personality in the Oval Office, but the reality remains that there is nothing of interest to be learned from an ongoing congressional investigation.The second angle, which is arguably more important, is that while Chaffetz is eager to conduct oversight of a former official who left office years ago, the Republican congressman has no interest in conducting oversight of the man who’ll actually become president next month.Congressional Democrats have pleaded with the Oversight Committee chairman to look into Trump’s various conflict-of-interest controversies, but Chaffetz has ignored them . Asked to explain his position, the GOP lawmaker told the Huffington Post yesterday, “It’s sort of ridiculous to go after him when his financial disclosure is already online.”The response doesn’t make much sense. The disclosure documents offer assessments of Trump’s assets and net worth, but this information does little to address his many conflicts of interest.There is no great mystery to the politics surrounding this mess: when Chaffetz assumed there’d be a Democratic White House, he was desperate to do oversight. When he learned there’d be a Republican White House, he slammed on the brakes – and came to the conclusion that the only person who really deserves more scrutiny isn’t the president with a burgeoning and congressionally unexplored scandal, but rather, his defeated opponent.And it’s not just Chaffetz. Politico reached out to a series of House and Senate Republicans this week, and found no real appetite for “aggressive oversight into Trump’s financial situation.” The article added, “[N]early every GOP leader approached for an interview on the topic hunkered down or tried to avoid comment.”My personal favorite was this Huffington Post report on the argument from House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.).