Mitch McConnell and his Republican Caucus are enthusiastic about the prospect of filling a Supreme Court vacancy before the midterm elections. But they don’t deny the enormity of the task at hand.

McConnell is overseeing the slimmest Senate majority in modern times to handle D.C. Circuit Judge Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation to the Supreme Court, and the majority leader has no margin for error in what’s effectively a 50-49 divide with Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) still out with brain cancer. The Kentucky Republican is simultaneously engaged in a brutal fight for control of the Senate that will be animated by the Supreme Court battle inside the chamber.


The handful of seats that will make a Senate majority in November are occupied by some of the same senators who will determine Kavanaugh’s fate. How McConnell and Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley handle the confirmation process is likely to have a major effect on how voters approach the midterm elections and determine whether McConnell stays majority leader.

Meanwhile, Republicans are also bracing for special counsel Robert Mueller to unveil his conclusions into whether Trump’s campaign colluded with the Kremlin in influencing the 2016 election — which will quickly get entangled in the Supreme Court fight. Kavanaugh has expressed opposition to criminal investigations of sitting presidents; and Democrats raised the issue on Monday night, with Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) calling it “troubling.”

Though GOP leaders have expressed confidence that the Senate would approve whomever President Donald Trump picked, they concede that the next two months are going to put their majority to the test.

As Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) put it: “Smoothness is probably not an outcome we can expect.”

“It’s going to be very challenging. The Democratic base is going to expect their officeholders to perform,” said Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn (R-Texas), who serves on the Judiciary Committee and counts the majority’s votes on the floor. “Chairman Grassley is going to handle this in an orderly, respectful way. But we’re not going to tolerate any foot-dragging either.”

Sign up here for POLITICO Huddle A daily play-by-play of congressional news in your inbox. Email Sign Up By signing up you agree to receive email newsletters or alerts from POLITICO. You can unsubscribe at any time. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

If the nomination of the next Supreme Court justice fails before the election, Republicans risk losing control of the chamber to Democrats and allowing Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer to take over the confirmation process. That increases the need for Republicans to move quickly — and for Democrats to do everything they can to pick apart Trump’s nominee.

Justices Neil Gorsuch and Sonia Sotomayor were confirmed 66 days after being nominated. The Judiciary Committee will announce a hearing date later this month, though it could take Kavanaugh longer than other potential nominees due to his long paper trail from working in the George W. Bush administration.

“This is not a political game for us,” said Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.), the No. 4 Democratic leader. “This is a person who casts the tie vote on major issues of health care for women, for people with pre-existing conditions, and major issues about protecting our land and water, about voting rights, about every part of our life.”

The heated atmosphere and high political stakes were on vivid display on Monday before a nominee was even named, as Schumer came to the Senate floor to demand an “affirmative statement of support for the personal liberties of all Americans from the next Supreme Court nominee.” But it seems there's nothing Kavanaugh can do to convince him.

"I will oppose Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination with everything I have, and I hope a bipartisan majority will do the same," Schumer said on Monday evening.

The strong opposition from Democratic leaders stems, in part, from McConnell’s move to prevent President Barack Obama’s last Supreme Court nominee, Merrick Garland, from even getting a hearing in 2016.

Watching McConnell launch a quick strike confirmation ahead of the midterms is almost too much for Democrats, with McConnell coming to the floor Monday to mock them, including Bob Casey (D-Pa.), for announcing opposition to a new justice before one was even named.

"This is an opportunity for Senators to put partisanship aside," McConnell implored senators on Monday night.



But Republicans are realistic about their challenges. The last time the Senate was divided as narrowly as it is now while considering a Supreme Court confirmation was 1959, when the chamber had yet to grow to 100 seats, according to a Politico analysis.

And GOP senators are barely even acknowledging the possibility that they could get 60 votes in support of a justice, the old standard before McConnell changed the filibuster threshold on Supreme Court nominees to a simple majority last year.

Instead, Republicans are courting a trio of red-state Democrats who supported Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch last year: Joe Manchin of West Virginia, Joe Donnelly of Indiana and Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota. All three turned down invitations to the White House for the announcement on Monday evening and all three are under tremendous pressure from liberals to oppose Trump’s nominee this time around — as is Sen. Doug Jones (D-Ala.), who will cast his first vote on the high court this year, though he won’t face voters again until 2020.

Similarly, they and other at-risk Democrats like Claire McCaskill of Missouri and Jon Tester of Montana will face a round of savage political attacks from the right if they vote no.

“If your state supported Donald Trump and you’re in a state where you’re trying to explain to voters why you voted against their nomination, it’s a very big challenge,” said Sen. Cory Gardner (R-Colo.), who chairs the GOP’s campaign arm. “It’s probably a hot potato you don’t want to have.”

Republicans don’t need Democrats if they can hold together their fractious caucus, and McConnell has generally fared well at that on nominations: None have failed on the Senate floor in the past 18 months, despite the GOP leader’s fragile majority, although a couple of controversial Trump nominees have withdrawn. But replacing swing vote Anthony Kennedy on the Supreme Court could prove more difficult.

Moderate GOP Sens. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine both generally support abortion rights, and Roe v Wade hangs in the balance with Kennedy’s retirement. And Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) have bucked some of Trump’s nominees.

But the easiest path to confirmation remains keeping every GOP senator in the fold.

“Republicans will all be there,” insisted Sen. John Thune of South Dakota, the No. 3 GOP leader. “Hopefully.”

Still, a strictly partisan vote would likely be harder for the GOP and Trump to defend ahead of the midterms.

Grassley said that he will be “deliberate” in the committee. And in former Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.), the nominee has an influential sherpa to help navigate the process. Kyl’s successor in the Senate, Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.), said Monday that Kyl is “well-respected by everybody — I think, both sides on the Judiciary Committee.”

But Democrats are not hopeful that the confirmation process will be bipartisan, in part because the selection process was run by the conservative Federalist Society. The Judiciary panel’s top Democrat, California Sen. Dianne Feinstein, was invited to the White House for Monday night’s rollout but declined to attend.

“They started with the Federalist list,” Durbin said earlier in the night. “I had a conversation with the White House, I said if you want to do this in a bipartisan way, you have to put the list aside and start this the right way. They said no.”

