Members of the liberal media had epic meltdowns following Attorney General William Barr’s Wednesday admission he was looking into how the Trump campaign was spied on in 2016. Despite the fact former FBI Director James Comey admitted the campaign was surveilled, ABC host George Stephanopoulos insisted that it somehow wasn’t really “spying”, during Sunday’s This Week. But the Clinton lackey was swiftly schooled by former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie.

In the midst of their roundtable discussion, lame duck Chicago mayor Rahm Emanuel argued that, “It was a counterintelligence investigation, it was approved by the courts. There was no spying. This was approved by the courts, here.”

“Rahm, that is spying,” Christie immediately interrupted. “That's not spying,” Stephanopoulos exclaimed in his liberal guest’s defense.

After Emanuel opined for a little bit, Christie took over and returned to the facts about spying. “There's legal spying and illegal spying, by the way. There’s legal and illegal spying. The Attorney General didn’t make any opinion on that, George, about whether it was legal or illegal,” Christie explained.

Stephanopoulos relented: “I guess spying generally has a negative connotation.”

“It’s electronic surveillance that the person who’s being surveilled doesn't know that they're being surveilled. I mean, what do you call that? It's another adjective,” Christie accurately continued. “Now, if [Barr] said it was illegal spying he would have been out of line because he doesn’t have the conclusion to do that yet.”

Republican strategist Alice Stewart agreed with Christie and suggested: “the Democrats are so busy being word police on this, they're losing sight of the fact of what the governor said: there's legal and illegal types of spying.”

And while the liberal media were busy spreading conspiracies about Barr lying for President Trump, Stewart made the point that Barr wouldn’t go out of his way to damage his reputation:

And look, we can all agree Attorney General Barr has a tremendous reputation, he has a tremendous history of his work in the law. He is not going to jeopardize his legacy by mischaracterizing the Mueller report. Surely, I think this four-page report may have been glossed over a little bit. He's not going jeopardize his legacy and mischaracterize information what the American people want to know.

The schooling was needed and deserved but the liberal media will likely stick to their false narrative anyway.

The transcript is below, click "expand" to read: