Likely GOP presidential candidate Scott Walker is calling for a constitutional amendment making same-sex marriage bans constitutional, should the Supreme Court strike them down.

For a while, it looked like Scott Walker might be (one of) the first Republican presidential candidates to support same-sex marriage. The Wisconsin governor, who routinely offers ambiguous answers, over the past year has allowed many to infer he might not oppose extending the institution of marriage to same-sex couples. Walker’s most-recent example of allowing voters to infer his actual positions and beliefs was his unique comment that he had not attended a same-sex wedding (no response if he would) but he had attended the reception for a same-sex wedding.

One reason some believed in Walker’s possible support is that he has a cousin who is gay, and his son was a witness at her wedding.Â And another was public opinion. TheÂ Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel reportedÂ last October, “polls have shown more support for same-sex marriage,” and added that Walker “has repeatedly answered questions about the ban by saying his opinion doesn’t matter because a governor can’t change the constitution.”

Apparently, Gov. Walker can’t change the Wisconsin constitution, but he thinks trying to change the U.S. Constitution is fair game.

If the Supreme Court grants same-sex couples the constitutional right to marry and prohibits states from banning that right, the 47-year old union-busting Tea Party Republican governor says he would support a federal constitutional amendment allowing states to ban same-sex couples from marrying.

LOOK:Â Opposition To Same-Sex Marriage May Cost GOP The White House In 2016, New Poll Says

In response to a Supreme Court ruling supporting same-sex couples, “the only other viable option out there is to support a constitutional amendment, which I would, again, believing, I believe in not just in marriage being defined as one man and one woman, but I also believe in statesâ€™ rights. I think thatâ€™s an issue that appropriately belongs in the states,”Â WalkerÂ toldÂ the conservative blog Caffeinated ThoughtsÂ on Saturday.

“I’m still holding out hope the United States Supreme Court will say, ‘Yes, indeed, states have a right to define what marriage is,'” Walker added.

He noted that as a state lawmaker and as a voter, he voted for a state constitutional ban on same-sex marriage, and he “defended it as governor” in federal courts.

The interview also included questions about abortion andÂ personhood laws, which declare life begins at conception and therefore abortion by definitionÂ â€“ and thus, state lawÂ â€“ would be murder, and illegal.

Right Wing Watch reports WalkerÂ “immediately” dodged the question “by saying that if he were president he wouldnâ€™t ‘handle any constitutional amendments.'”

So, to be clear, a President Walker supports constitutional amendments allowing states to ban same-sex marriage, but a President Walker doesn’t “handle any constitutional amendments” when it comes to a woman’s right to choose.

Once again proving Scott Walker is the king of ambiguous and conflicting answers.

Watch:

Â

Related:

Band To GOP Gov. Scott Walker: ‘Please Stop Using Our Music…We Literally Hate You !!!’

Federal Judge Blocks Governor Scott Walker’s Latest Power Grab – This Time It’s Women’s Bodies He’s After

Scott Walker Is Dead Wrong On Hospital Visitation Rights For Gay Couples

Â

Image by Gage Skidmore via FlickrÂ and a CC license

Hat tip and video: Right Wing Watch

Â