Guy Leven-Torres recycled an essay in the comments section the other day. This 1,800 word colloquy was prefaced with a brief, breezy by-your-leave:

Hope you don’t mind Baron — I wrote this 4 years ago… It is relevant.

It is indeed relevant… in parts. But nothing from 2011 is going to be fresh. The section on Libya is outdated by now; in 2011 you hadn’t yet been introduced to IS —> ISIS —>ISIL and now Daesh. Not to mention the other areas of new wasteland in MENA.

Still, whatever the date, it’s inappropriate to leave an essay of more than 1,800 words disguised as a comment with a breezy “hope you don’t mind, Baron…(that I make your readers’ eyes glaze over”)…

This has gone far enough, sir. From now on, you have to follow the rules: lengthy monographs (and this one was obviously intended for some other audience you were addressing five years ago) belong in the comments on the News Feed; that is the place which serves as our Speakers’ Corner. People may declaim at length on divers subjects.

I have received several complaints about the need to scroll and scroll to get past long polemics. Take your pick of their descriptions: “waay too long” “inhumanely lengthy”, “causes m.e.g.o.” — i.e, the acronym for my-eyes-glaze-over.

I can’t remember if this particular essay was even on topic. Generally, the ‘topic’ changes as people mention tangential issues so that category isn’t important. However, your essay wasn’t a direct reply to another commenter. As I recall, you just plunked it down with that “hope you don’t mind”…

You’re not the only offender in this regard. Some people — I, for one — tend to get going and then don’t know when to stop. I’m giving it up for Lent, in the hope it will become my new habit after forty days. There are others who don’t cut-and-paste their own work but leave a number of links with long excisions of the material appended. Those belong in the News Feed also.

FOR THE FUTURE: Should you feel the need to write new sermons or recycle old ones, just drop them off in the News Feed. People will read them. But in the comment threads on posts I ask that you limit it: anywhere between 300 and 500 (max) words is acceptable. Here is a word count tool in case you’re in doubt.

This essay has been heavily edited but only for style. All the ideas contained therein are intact with brackets to indicate my excisions. Since there was no title, I added one to indicate the subject.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

The Decline from Rome to Feltham

by Guy Leven-Torres

16th September 2011

Our civilisation is slowly but surely collapsing — or rather metamorphosing — into something else. Let me repeat again my earlier classifications of types of society:

Civilisation

Empirsation

Primitivisation or Culturalisation.

They [each] have these characteristics [respectively]:

Civilisation [possesses] urban development, democracy, liberty, small government, free thought, originality, and progress. Examples are: 19th Century Britain, Classical Rome, and Greece.

[possesses] urban development, democracy, liberty, small government, free thought, originality, and progress. Examples are: 19th Century Britain, Classical Rome, and Greece. Empirisation [has] big government [and attendant] large bureaucracy and welfare, despotism, decreasing liberty and [decreasing] civil discourse. There is overarching ideological tyranny, but most important [are] declining standards of education and thought [that are] replaced by [correct thought vs.]’heresy’. Examples are:’Liberal’Modern Britain and America, USSR and the Third Reich.[…]

[has] big government [and attendant] large bureaucracy and welfare, despotism, decreasing liberty and [decreasing] civil discourse. There is overarching ideological tyranny, but most important [are] declining standards of education and thought [that are] replaced by [correct thought vs.]’heresy’. Examples are:’Liberal’Modern Britain and America, USSR and the Third Reich.[…] Primitivisation or Culturalisation has recognisable culture [along] with primitive beliefs, a lack of [widespread] technology, and tribal or family-[kinship political] structures. [These are] often highly patriarchal. Examples are: European feudal society, Anglo-Saxon England, Islam, and various tribal societies around the globe

There are sub-categories [in] the process [of moving from one category to […] another. One […] is ‘Proto-Civilisation’; another is ‘Proto-Culture’. ‘Proto’ simply means ‘The first’ or ‘original’, as in ‘prototype’ to describe the first and only model of what is to come.

Rome was a ‘civilisation’, even though she was also an ‘empire’ due to the characteristics of her rule and attitude to Law. Unlike the current Brussels’ Imperium, [Rome] valued her citizens. [However]Rome did change gradually into an Empirisation as despotic rule destroyed the Republic. This period was known as […] ‘The Dominate’. Augustus at least, had followed the forms of Republican rule, even if his reign was a barely disguised dictatorship. Earlier emperors had to watch their step, since the citizen legions within which their imperial authority lay, could exert the [privileges of] their citizenry. But [Emperors had] especially to avoid the Senate’s displeasure if the[were found to be] not up to the mark.

Throughout the whole period of the Imperium, [each] Emperor had to watch his back where large gatherings of citizens took place. [For example, in the arena [citizens] could use their collective voice to air their opinions about the current state of affairs. As late as 610 AD, the eastern Emperor Phocas lost his throne in such a manner. This was why the rulers had a personal guard in their thousands.

These same troops could decide to take note of the citizenry’s demands and act on their behalf, as they did in 41 AD to remove the evil Caligula, then again in 68 AD with Nero [or] 97/98 AD with Nerva […]. This was ‘democracy’ even if one does not recognise it [as such]today.

The European Union is a totally undemocratic society in any way one looks at it. [Power is in the hands of a very selfish, arrogant Socialist elite [who] seem oblivious to the lessons of history,[including perhaps] a self-immolation now hopefully descending on them.

There [is not an EU] Praetorian Guard to remove the European Commission on behalf of its fed-up frustrated citizens: [not] at the time they made Eire vote again [and again] on the dreaded Lisbon Treaty for the ‘required answer’, [n]or for the[ir] endless bailouts to ‘rescue’ countries in the ‘Eurozone’ [who were and are] in the throes of societal collapse. As usual the elite ignored reality and [has] continued on its merry way, so making the catastrophe, when it comes, far worse than it needed to be.

Such is the Socialists’ blind unquestioning obedience to Marxist theological cant and self interest; there [appears to be] an utter inability to admit when they were wrong, so all must suffer.

In short Rome, with its Praetorians, was more democratic than our own society. Our own armies laid waste in stupid foreign wars, unwinnable wars, and do not let ‘Free Libya’ fool you! […]

They should have acted, or rather the Monarch should have.[…] The Army [ought to have been] ordered to step in when Brown showed his true colours by refusing a promised Referendum on the EU. [Or when] Brown arrogantly had himself photographed as ‘The Great Socialist Dear Leader’ as he sign[ed] away the UK through the Lisbon Treaty and a Marxist despotism; as though 77,000,000 Britons and their Kingdom were his personal fiefdom.

Such is and always has been the Socialist plans for the Britain they despise. I despise and loathe them in turn. The whole damn lot deserve to hang, as I hope […] they will one day under our ‘repealed’ Treason Laws of 1351/2.

There is a new term needed to describe our own present situation. [We are in] a state of flux as the country wanes and waxes under the baleful influence of ‘multiculturalism’. [We are] moving towards a form of society or societies as yet unknown, but perhaps glimpsed in [various ways]. [There was the] violence of August 2011 on the streets of London, [and] the nasty sink estate ghettos from which many of the ‘Underclass’ erupted.

If we continue on this trajectory we may cease to be a United Kingdom even in ‘form’ but a whole series of warring, paranoid ‘communities’, even proto-statelets reflecting the many alien peoples and beliefs that now make up perhaps 14,000,000 to 20,000,000 of Britain’s population (according to one source I have, a fellow academic and Professor of Physics). On trains travelling to London from Staines during all hours of the day, one hardly hears English at all.

As people know, I spent a number of years utilising my archaeological ethnographic expertise, quantifying population statistics in whole areas across the country, especially inner cities. I did this by counting the numbers of obviously alien individuals within a given area as opposed to white indigenes. The figures for Birmingham, Leeds and most of London preclude beyond reasonable doubt that there are perhaps three times as many migrants in the country — especially Moslems — as [are] officially admitted. A town near me, Feltham, has changed into a nearly fully migrant town in just [the previous] three to five years. It was once a dumping ground for ‘white trash’ left to fester and breed once the main employer ‘EMI’ collapsed — or to put it more accurately,[…] following the deliberate stripping of assets. This [process] is repeated across the country in places like the Midlands.

(One of my other passions is electronics and radio. I once worked at EMI as an electronics Buyer.)

In Feltham the sight of [women in] burkas, head-dresses and other alien paraphernalia, accompanied by numerous children, is now ubiquitous. The remaining white unemployed population (has been)left to fester, hanging around pubs cadging money or shouting abuse at each other; this is exactly the type of situation that led to riots in London. The good news is that the migrants are far better behaved and civil.

For those who disagree with my ‘statistics’ I point them to recent supermarket sales’ receipts used to measure a purchase index, detailing how much and what type of food to buy in. [At work] I used the same methodology to purchase and forward order stocks of components to exacting ‘Re-order levels’, based upon ‘JIT’ or ‘Just in Time’ delivery schedules that are mathematically worked out to ensure too much stock was not carried by any firm in the business. {thus] I know that supermarkets, especially ones with low profit-fast turnover regimes like the above, are very accurate.

So in this light I would say we have a population around 80,000,000 and perhaps 20,000,000 migrants. [That is] 14,000,000 more than the 6,000,000 admitted to [by Government]. The experience of Feltham and other boroughs of London would indeed seem to support this.

As I keep stating, I am a scholar, a very concerned scholar [and] one dedicated to objective fact, not to the ‘cooked’ statistics Government likes to [use] to fool its population. The latter may assuage the white-hating, Moslem-dominated, hysterical sociopaths in the Unite Against Fascists, or even the patriotic members of UKIP or the BNP, rightly suspicious of government migration figures. [But]it is becoming more than obvious that the UK, especially England, is destroyed. We are not quite there yet but not far. What can one do with 20,000,000, many of whom are far better behaved than the indigenous [underclass]?

It appals me to see what has been done to us. However we have done nothing in reply but [have] simply allowed the situation to evolve until it is insurmountable. Those like Bishop of Rochester Nazir Ali, who warned of the growth of Islamic sovereign states in our cities, was forced to resign by a nasty campaign of Chinese whispers by ‘liberal’ fellow clergy. I have no such problem, so can speak my mind or rather write it. I receive endless threats from the usual suspects but I simply carry on!

Somebody asked me who I would rather live with if I had to live in Feltham — the ‘white trash’ or migrants? I replied, “Neither…but on balance the better-behaved latter […] if they allowed my coloured wife and I to do so. In our previous experience this has not been the case. Some twenty years ago I was offered a lucrative contract in Saudi Arabia, accompanied by my spouse. When the company met her, they withdrew the offer with the remarks, “Your wife would never be left alone, she would have to hide away, since she resembles one of their own women — her life would be miserable and she would be forced to cover from head to toe, never allowed out and forever under the eye of the religious police!” I could not subject her to such a life.

I have lived in Moslem countries as a child and can confirm this view.

Britain is in flux moving towards a new entity. Will it be a Balkans’ style multicultural mess broken up into a countryside populated by what is left of the indigenous population, while the cities adapt to a series of race, creed and cult dominated ‘mini-statelets’ always on the verge of immediate violence, into which the Police fear to go? Or will we simply drift through our own bovine apathy into a Moslem state by default and come to resemble Western Pakistan? At present one could describe Britain as ‘acultural’ or even a ‘metaculturation’.

Meanwhile in Libya, if a Libyan I know is right, Sarkozy and Cameron, the modern day political equivalent of ‘Laurel and Hardy’ naively perform to the hopefully amused ‘Free Libyans’. Bassem told me,”It was a great show, Guy! But we don’t even know who is actually in charge there! The street buzz is that it is Moslem Brothers! Your politicians, are either highly cynical and playing a game, or just plain stupid!”

My major objection to Cameron and his forerunners is their almost complete lack of cultural and historical understanding, and, one has to say, short-term shallow political practices. They also lack education, and the necessary gravitas [of] statesman,[which is] necessary to steer us through this growing, potentially violent storm. They are mentally far too young, their mindset and habits suitable to run a small business but hardly the materiel to govern an ancient land like Britain. In political and historical terms they are children.

Keep and eye on the Near East, we have seen nothing yet. Piracy has been reported off Libyan coasts too. I am sorry, dear reader, that I have not been able to report better news for once!

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

So… meet you in the comments, sir…we’ll both be laconic, right.