Jody, left, and Maria May-Chang greet as couples gather at the Ada County Courthouse to apply for same-sex marriage licenses in Boise, Idaho on October 8, 2014.

WASHINGTON — Idaho Gov. Butch Otter went to court on Monday morning seeking to keep same-sex couples from marrying in the state.

Hours later, however, the state's attorney general, Lawrence Wasden, split with the governor. He argued that recent Supreme Court action means state officials "cannot satisfy the stringent standards governing issuance of stays." In other words, because the Supreme Court didn't think a stay was appropriate in the case, Wasden does not think the state could make a successful argument in favor of a stay.

The dueling Republican officials' filings at the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals was a sign of the almost breakneck pace of change in the legal fight over whether states can prohibit same-sex couples from marrying.

The Monday moves followed a week of legal maneuvering by the state since the appeals court ruled on Oct. 7 that Idaho's ban on same-sex couples' marriages is unconstitutional.

On Friday evening, Oct. 10, the Supreme Court denied Idaho's request for the court to issue a stay keeping the 9th Circuit from issuing its mandate — the final step in putting its ruling into effect.

Soon after, lawyers for the same-sex couples who had sued Idaho asked for the 9th Circuit to end the stay it earlier had granted to the state pending the outcome of its appeal of the trial court's decision. The 9th Circuit ordered a response to the request from state officials by 12 p.m. PT Monday.

Although Wasden noted that his filing did "not reflect reconsideration of their position concerning the validity of Idaho's marriage laws or the strength of their legal position," the split with the governor over whether same-sex couples should be able to marry during any appeal is a significant concession in a strong conservative state.