Soy - Programmable templates for Go, Java, JS

Closure Templates (aka Soy Templates) is a client and server-side templating language developed at Google. The Go implementation exposes the the internal structure of the template (the AST). This article highlights a couple of interesting applications where we’ve benefited from being able to programmatically inspect and modify this structure.

Background

Earlier this year, we developed a system for publishing a web site based on information in our CMS (content management system). The pages are regenerated when any relevant information changes. Efficiency is important so that developers working on the site can see their updates reflected quickly, so that the system can keep up with the large number of updates flying around, and of course to impress the client.

We chose Closure Templates for this project for a few reasons:

Use the same templates from Java, JS, and Go - As a former Java shop, having one template language work across the system is wonderful.

Internationalization support - Clients want localized versions of their web sites. Language and tooling support makes it relatively painless.

Great documentation / easy to learn - Outside developers would be working on the site templates, not us. Closure Templates has been around for a long time, and the documentation site is solid.

This article assumes basic familiarity with the syntax. It may be helpful to read through the introductory example first, if you haven’t seen it before.

Inspecting a template

Let’s look at example code that prints a simple template’s AST. It involves 3 different types:

The template.Registry is the top-level type returned by the template compiler

ast.Node is the standard interface implemented by all elements of the AST

ast.ParentNode is implemented by all nodes that contain other nodes

Here’s the code

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 package main import ( "fmt" "strings" "github.com/robfig/soy" "github.com/robfig/soy/ast" ) const example = ` {namespace example} /** @param name */ {template .helloWorld} Hello {$name ?: 'world'} {/template}` func main () { registry , _ := soy . NewBundle (). AddTemplateString ( "example" , example ). Compile () for _ , t := range registry . Templates { fmt . Println ( "Template:" , t . Node . Name ) fmt . Println ( "Params:" , t . Doc . Params ) walk ( t . Node , 0 ) } } func walk ( node ast . Node , indent int ) { fmt . Printf ( "%s%T

" , strings . Repeat ( "\t" , indent ), node ) if parent , ok := node .( ast . ParentNode ); ok { for _ , child := range parent . Children () { walk ( child , indent + 1 ) } } }

The above program produces the output:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 $ go run ~/test.go Template: example.helloWorld Params: [@param name] *ast.TemplateNode *ast.ListNode *ast.RawTextNode *ast.PrintNode *ast.ElvisNode *ast.DataRefNode *ast.StringNode

With just a small modification to the program, we could do something like process every data reference in the template ( $name ).

Let’s see one application of this technique by the web publishing system.

Lazily load source data

Page templates

A client’s web page template looks something like this

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 /** * @param name * @param address * @param city * @param state * ... (~30 more params) ... */ {template .location} <!doctype html> <html> <head> <title>{$name} - {$address1}</title> ... {/template}

The client’s web site templates are written using Closure Templates, with a list of parameters covering all of the available content. When any of the content changes, the relevant pages should be automatically regenerated and deployed.

Beyond simple values like name and address, the business location page may use a lot of information across the system. For example:

Show the N nearest business locations to this location

Show the N latest Facebook posts or Instagram tags

Show the current list of featured products at this location

Show links to any of their listings (e.g. their Yelp page)

In a system organized around function, RPCs are required to fetch the information from the owning system. Especially when regenerating the entire site (thousands of locations), it is desirable to avoid loading data unless we really need it.

Here’s a quick overview of our solution

Data sources and usage

We created a type to track the various data sources. It’s a bitmask to represent the set of possible data sources that may be used.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 // DataSource is an enumeration of sources (beyond core profile data) that may // be queried by a location template. type DataSource uint16 const ( ECLs DataSource = 1 << iota // Enhanced Content Lists Posts // Social Posts Photos // Photos (By Label) Nearby // Nearby Locations Listings // Listings ... ) // DataUsage tracks which data sources are used by a particular template. type DataUsage struct { sources DataSource } // Has queries whether or not the specified data source is marked as used. func ( u DataUsage ) Has ( source DataSource ) bool { return ( u . sources & source ) != 0 }

In order to create a DataUsage , we read the list of params:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 // UsageOf deduces the location data required by a soy template by analyzing // its parameters for known special names. func UsageOf ( template template . Template ) ( DataUsage , error ) { var usage DataUsage for _ , param := range template . Doc . Params { switch param . Name { case "productLists" , "calendars" , "bios" , "menus" : usage . sources |= ECLs case "posts" : usage . sources |= Posts case "nearby" : usage . sources |= Nearby case "listings" : usage . sources |= Listings case "photos" : usage . sources |= Photos ...

Now that we know what data the template needs, we just have to edit the data loading code to be a bit lazier.

Be lazy

Now, it’s easy to only load data that’s used by the template.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 var ( loc * profile . Location ecls [] * enhancedlists . ListProto posts [] pagedata . Post nearby [] NearbyLocation ... ) loc = loader . Profile ( id ) if usage . Has ( ECLs ) { ecls = loader . Lists ( loc ) } if usage . Has ( Posts ) { posts = loader . Posts ( id ) } ...

RPCs via Map lookup

The optimization I’ve described so far relies just on reading the parameters to a template. Here’s one that actually needs to inspect the template.

The template has access to a map which it can use to look up photo assets in the account given a label. For example, photosByLabel['storefront'] would return the photos labeled “storefront” This information is accessible via RPC to our photo search service. We inspect the template to see which labels are requested, and we load the results in bulk ahead of time.

Here is how it may be used in a template

1 2 3 4 5 6 {foreach $photo in $photosByLabel['storefront']} <div class="storefront-photo"> <img height="{$photo.height}" width="{$photo.width}" src="{$photo.url}"/> <span class="caption">{$photo.caption}</span> </div> {/foreach}

Here is a function that extracts the map references from the templates, or returns an error if the map is accessed by something other than a string constant.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 // extractPhotoLabels adds label text found in expressions of the form // photosByLabel['label'] to the given set. // The node traversal we use to access the label is the following: // *ast.DataRefNode.Access[0].(*ast.DataRefExprNode).Arg.(*ast.StringNode).Value func extractPhotoLabels ( node ast . Node , labelPhotoKeySet map [ string ] struct {}) error { if dataRef , ok := node .( * ast . DataRefNode ); ok && dataRef . Key == photosParam { if len ( dataRef . Access ) == 0 { return newErr ( dataRef . String ()) } var exprNode , ok = dataRef . Access [ 0 ].( * ast . DataRefExprNode ) if ! ok { return newErr ( dataRef . String ()) } stringNode , ok := exprNode . Arg .( * ast . StringNode ) if ! ok { return newErr ( exprNode . String ()) } labelPhotoKeySet [ stringNode . Value ] = struct {}{} } if parent , ok := node .( ast . ParentNode ); ok { for _ , child := range parent . Children () { if err := extractPhotoLabels ( child , labelPhotoKeySet ); err != nil { return err } } } return nil }

This solution is superior to the usual alternative of writing a template function that directly issues the RPC, because we may be rendering the same template thousands of times and loading the information in bulk provides a dramatic speedup.

In just a few lines of code, we’ve shown how template authors can access data from across the system, while we arrange for just the data that’s used to be efficiently loaded and provided to the template.

Conclusion

This article covers just the tip of a web publishing iceberg that we’ve built in Go (30k+ LOC). Soon we’ll be extending it to support international/localized versions of client sites, automatic compilation of Soy to JS for client-side rendering, and other fun stuff.

The super fast builds, great tooling, and simple yet effective language primitives have made it great fun to develop in Go. The end result performs very well and is easy to maintain.

If you’d like to join a small motivated team in NYC building software used by the largest brands in the world, message me @robfig, or check us out at http://www.yext.com/company/careers/engineering/.