K. from Germany has translated two articles about recent Islam-related news in Germany. One of them concerns the appalling fact that a Muslim woman at the Migration Board is in charge of deciding the asylum cases of Middle East Christians. The other — no less appalling — is about the jailing of a man who posted political satire on Facebook.

The first article is from Politically Incorrect:

Germany: Muslims decide protection status of persecuted Christians

by Sarah Goldmann

A Christian family from Iraq, who feel victimized by Muslim terrorists, asks for asylum in Germany. At the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees (BAMF), of all things they are facing a woman in an [Islamic] headscarf, who is to decide whether the threats by radical Muslims are grounds for asylum.

It is hardly surprising that the Mohammedan rejects the Christians’ asylum application. Because — while we would like to learn otherwise — out of not a single mosque have we ever heard anything about prayers of Muslims against the oppression of Christians by their radical brothers in faith.

If this is true, then it shows, that Muslims worldwide don’t care about the persecution of Christians by perverted IS butchers and other brutal Islamic groupings, and it is to be feared that they either don’t take it seriously, play it down, or clandestinely delight in it. Almost ten years ago, when it was still allowed, the Merkur wrote the following about the totally normal attitude of Muslims and their religious leaders towards Christians:

“Sheikh Mahmood, former director of Al Azhar University in Cairo, one of Islam’s highest religious authorities, goes even further: ‘Christians are like a malicious and infectious disease. Muslims have to treat them unjustly, despise them, boycott and treat them harshly to force them to adopt Islam.’ It cannot be made more clear, how much Islam shapes the Muslims’ way of thinking and acting in all areas of life.”

So, the fact that an adherent of this creed gets to decide the fate of Christians who are despised and hated by this creed, virtually against her own people, would be comparable with SS men who were required to rule about the departure of Jews from Nazi Germany.

Correspondingly, the employment of a member of this Islamic “religion” against potentially real refugees seeking protection can never produce neutral and unbiased decisions. This Muslim woman gets to decide the fate of Christians in a German federal office, today, tomorrow, every day. This is not criticised by anybody.

This is basically because Islam, against all better knowledge, is assumed to be “peaceful” and not the hateful ideology that has more than just one problem with other religions. This axiom of the peaceful Islam may no longer be doubted in the politically correct world. The only one who took the liberty to express gentle criticism, Wolfgang Bosbach [refers to the first article linked above in Die WELT], consequently does this very, very carefully:

“If these Christians ‘have to describe their victimization to a headscarf-wearing Muslima, then I can understand the applicants’ worrying that the decision about their application could possibly turn out not to be entirely objective and free of prejudice,’ says the interior expert.”

The man knows his limits in these times. Anyone who really wants to stand up for law and order, against arbitrariness on the part of authorities, against biased employees in the BAMF, and for real refugees, can do this strongly, but please in appropriate friendly tone via this address: [BAMF official contact info]