Here's every California House member's position on impeachment according to bill sponsorship, news releases, social media posts, television interviews and other reports.

Pete Aguilar (D) 31st District (Redlands) Supports Special Counsel Mueller's report and testimony clearly outlined unacceptable, inappropriate and potentially criminal conduct by the president, including obstruction of justice. Despite attempts in Congress to investigate the president's actions, the administration has chosen to hinder investigations, withhold documents, and ignore congressional subpoenas. No American is above the law. After careful consideration and conversations with members of my community, I believe it is time for the House to begin proceedings to determine whether the president's conduct meets the standards of impeachment. — From an Aug. 1, 2019, news release

Nanette Barragán (D) 44th District (San Pedro) Supports I support an impeachment inquiry. No one is above the law and Congress has a constitutional duty to act. — From a June 3, 2019, email statement to Times staff

Karen Bass (D) 37th District (Los Angeles) Supports Ever since Trump set foot in the Oval Office, he has been on a mission to rip apart decades of policies that protect civil rights, the environment, public lands and more. He has embarrassed our nation in the eyes of the world with his regular display of ignorance of treaties and historic alliances along with his horrific treatment of families and violation of international laws at our borders. It is time for a formal impeachment inquiry against this lawless and unstable President. — From a Sept. 24, 2019, news release

Ami Bera (D) 7th District (Elk Grove) Supports After reading the Mueller Report and witnessing the President's actions, it has been clear to me that President Trump has committed impeachable offenses and went to great lengths to commit obstruction of justice on several occasions. Multiple committees with jurisdiction have been conducting important and necessary oversight, including investigating and holding hearings into obstruction, corruption, and abuse of power by President Trump. I have supported the committees' actions and will continue to do so, including an impeachment inquiry. — From a Sept. 24, 2019, news release

Julia Brownley (D) 26th District (Westlake Village) Supports I believe the Mueller report, on its own, shows egregious encouragement for a foreign adversary to undermine our democracy, and irrefutable evidence of obstruction of justice. Further, President Trump's repeated statements that he invites future illegal, foreign interference in our elections, his repeated current attempts to obstruct Congress' oversight authority, and his clear intent to continue to obstruct justice and the will of Congress, create an urgency of action. I am, therefore, calling for the immediate opening of an impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump. — From a July 23, 2019, news release

Ken Calvert (R) 42nd District (Corona) opposes House Democrats have been ready to impeach first and find a rationale later since they lost the 2016 election. They’re at it again. The President has said he will release the unredacted script of his call with Ukraine’s President, but the Democrats are once again plowing ahead before we have the facts. — From a Sept. 24, 2019, news report

Salud Carbajal (D) 24th District (Santa Barbara) Supports I've read the full Mueller Report, the president knew the rules and he broke them—he cannot be above the law. That is why I believe it is time to open an impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump. ... The question of impeachment goes beyond party. It is about defending our democracy and our Constitution, the bedrock of our nation's values. We cannot ignore this president's actions, and we cannot let him off the hook because of his title. — From an Aug. 2, 2019, news release

Tony Cárdenas (D) 29th District (Los Angeles) Supports After carefully studying the Mueller report and watching how this President instructs current and former officials to ignore Congressional subpoenas and to act unlawfully, Congress has no choice but to open an impeachment inquiry. — From a June 20, 2019, news release

Judy Chu (D) 27th District (Monterey Park) Supports When Special Counsel Mueller testified before Congress, he reiterated clear evidence that President Trump obstructed justice and that if Trump were not the President, he would be on trial. The next day, the Senate Intelligence Committee released a bipartisan report on foreign interference in the 2016 election, confirming that Russia targeted election systems in every single state in our country. These threats undermine our democracy, and Donald Trump repeatedly attempted to obstruct the federal investigation into them. I believe it is time for Congress to open an impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump. — From a July 30, 2019, news release

Gil Cisneros (D) 39th District (Yorba Linda) Supports I have maintained that impeachment is an incredibly serious undertaking, and if we pursue it formally, we must do so with incredible care. While I did not come to this decision lightly, above all else I place patriotism, our national security, and our country first. As my colleagues and I stated in our recent editorial, if these allegations are found to be true, this is an impeachable offense. — From a Sept. 23, 2019, op-ed

Paul Cook (R) 8th District (Yucca Valley) opposes After reviewing the evidence, I'm opposed to impeachment. I'm concerned that the partisan impeachment process being pushed by House Democrats will further distract from Congress's ability to work with the President to rebuild our infrastructure, strengthen our military, and avoid future government shutdowns. Voters will have a chance to issue the final verdict on the President in next year's election. — From an Oct. 8, 2019, statement to Times staff

J. Luis Correa (D) 46th District (Santa Ana) Supports No one is above the law. For the past nine months, I have joined my colleagues on the House Judiciary Committee in investigating the many abuses of power levied against this President. We have addressed many issues, but the President's effort to request assistance from the Ukrainian government for his political gain is something entirely different. Today, I stand shoulder to shoulder with Speaker Pelosi and formally announce my support for an impeachment inquiry of the President of the United States. Congress must act quickly and judiciously to ascertain all the facts about this egregious abuse of power by a sitting President. No one is above the law. — From a Sept. 24, 2019, news release

Jim Costa (D) 16th District (Fresno) Supports The allegations the President may have used his position to intimidate a foreign government for personal gain are alarming. As members of Congress, we took an oath to preserve and protect our democracy and Constitution. We cannot turn a blind eye to abuse of power. I support an official impeachment investigation. It is paramount the six committees that have jurisdiction continue to investigate whether any high crimes and misdemeanors have been committed by President Trump. As a member of the Foreign Affairs committee, one of the investigating committees, I will work diligently to determine if there was an effort by this president to coerce a foreign government to undermine our democracy and put our nation at risk. — From a Sept. 24, 2019, news release

TJ Cox (D) 21st District (Fresno) Supports I didn't come to Washington to impeach a president, I came here to do everything in my power to give Central Valley's working families a hand up and grow our local economy for generations to come. I've worked every day to keep that promise. But when the President of the United States is putting his personal and political interests ahead of the American people and abusing the Constitution, we have a duty to investigate and follow the facts where they lead. An impeachment inquiry will allow us to break through the President's stonewalling and obstruction and get the answers the American people deserve. — From a Sept. 24, 2019, tweet

Susan A. Davis (D) 53rd District (San Diego) Supports It is time to open an impeachment inquiry. To not move forward would make Congress complicit in the President's behavior. President Trump's actions surrounding Ukraine epitomize his disregard for checks and balances as well as normal practices and protocols. It adds to a growing list of illegal acts abuse of power showing this President does not have either the capacity or the interest to follow the rule of law. The President admitted he made the call, leveraging the power of his office to get what he wanted from a head of State. — From a Sept. 24, 2019, tweet

Mark DeSaulnier (D) 11th District (Concord) Supports On his final day as Special Counsel, Robert Mueller took the rare step of speaking publicly to the American people. He made it clear that President Trump was not exonerated by his investigation, but that while Department of Justice (DOJ) policy prevented him from charging a sitting President with a crime, Congress could do so. He was equally clarion in saying, ‘if we had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so.' Congress must do its job, which includes overriding the DOJ policy that protects the president under any circumstance, and beginning an impeachment inquiry. — From a May 29, 2019, news release

Anna G. Eshoo (D) 18th District (Menlo Park) Supports I fully support the Speaker's announcement of a new impeachment inquiry. The circumstances surrounding the President's phone call with a foreign leader requires it and we are obligated to go wherever the facts lead. — From a Sept. 24, 2019, news release

John Garamendi (D) 3rd District (Walnut Grove) Supports That is in preparation so that we know all the information necessary that would be in an impeachment resolution. … This is a very important step, moves us forward, gives us critically important information." — From a July 23, 2019, CNN interview with Wolf Blitzer

Jimmy Gomez (D) 34th District (Los Angeles) Supports Congress is a co-equal branch of government. We will not stand idly by as this administration runs roughshod over the Constitution. I have voted twice to start debate on articles of impeachment. And I would do it again in a heartbeat. We will hold this president accountable. — From a May 29, 2019, tweet

Josh Harder (D) 10th District (Turlock) Supports Anyone willing to sacrifice the national security interests of the United States for their own benefit is unfit to be president. If these allegations are true, it's time for the House to open impeachment proceedings. I'm keeping my focus on the issues that affect people in the Central Valley every day like the high costs of health care, employment opportunities, and access to water. My colleagues on the relevant committees will keep leading their charges as I lead mine. But during a time like this, I feel it's my responsibility to add my voice to the chorus calling for a return to accountability, transparency, and honor in government. — From a Sept. 24, 2019, news release

Katie Hill (D) 25th District (Agua Dulce) Supports If Congress confirms reports of egregious misconduct that threaten the security of our country or undermine faith in our democracy, I will vote to impeach the President. My vote on articles of impeachment will not be a vote I come to lightly. I acknowledge how divisive an issue this has been, and will be, as investigations move forward. But we cannot let partisan politics interfere with the responsibilities assigned to Congress in the Constitution, and I hope my colleagues, regardless of party, will uphold their oath. — From a Sept. 24, 2019, news release

Jared Huffman (D) 2nd District (San Rafael) Supports Impeachment is an extraordinary measure, but it should be clear to anyone who examines the facts that President Trump's actions justify his impeachment, including his efforts to obstruct justice, his self-enrichment and serial violations of the Emoluments Clause, and his involvement in a cover-up stemming from his campaign's very likely collusion with Russian interests to undermine the 2016 presidential election. — From a Dec. 6, 2017, news release

Duncan D. Hunter (R) 50th District (Alpine) opposes Democrats know that the Senate will not convict this President, but they continue to pursue impeachment for the simple political purpose of being able to claim he was impeached. Continuing to waste time on this rather than other important issues is embarrasing and the American people already see right through this shallow display. — From a Sept. 24, 2019, tweet

Ro Khanna (D) 17th District (Fremont) Supports We have to be meticulous, we have to be comprehensive, but I think there's enough time if we start addressing things in September to get the work done this year. — From an Aug. 29, 2019, news release

Doug LaMalfa (R) 1st District (Richvale) opposes The facts simply don't support their baseless accusations, but they aren't concerned about that – they want to impeach [President Trump] by any means necessary. Speaker Pelosi and House Democrats chose to open an impeachment inquiry based on information they haven't seen and a source they do not know. Just last week, they wanted to impeach Justice Kavanaugh, so this must be their latest ‘impeachment of the week.' — From a Sept. 24, 2019, tweet

Barbara Lee (D) 13th District (Oakland) Supports Rep. Lee is a co-sponsor of an impeachment inquiry resolution by Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.). — From a May 23, 2019, Co-sponsor to House bill introduced by Rashida Tlaib

Mike Levin (D) 49th District (San Juan Capistrano) Supports In my seven months in office, I have kept my focus on our district and not on the distractions of Washington DC. But, I cannot ignore the dysfunction, corruption, and abuse of democracy that we witness every day from President Trump. We have the serious crimes revealed in the Mueller Report including multiple examples of obstruction of justice. We have the president's encouragement of foreign interference with our elections. We have witnessed his contempt for democratic norms and institutions, including his repeated failure to respond to legitimate requests for documents and information making it impossible for Congress to exercise its Constitutionally mandated oversight responsibilities. As a result, I feel we can no longer wait. I must now support an impeachment inquiry in order to get to the truth for my constituents. — From a July 26, 2019, news release

Ted Lieu (D) 33rd District (Torrance) Supports Let me just be very clear. Democrats are not saying impeachment. What I'm saying, what some others are saying, is an impeachment inquiry. Which is we have to start these investigations to see if we should do impeachment. Those are very different issues. — From a May 22, 2019, CNN interview with Wolf Blitzer

Zoe Lofgren (D) 19th District (San Jose) Supports A formal impeachment inquiry should be undertaken in the House of Representatives. The President has now admitted that he asked the President of Ukraine to take actions to help his re-election. That conduct alone violates his obligations under the Constitution. These facts pose a threat to our national security. — From a Sept. 24, 2019, news release

Alan Lowenthal (D) 47th District (Long Beach) Supports Special Counsel Mueller's statement yesterday highlighted what was clear in his report. Our democracy was attacked by a foreign power, and there is evidence that the president obstructed justice. Congress must hold him accountable. I believe the time has come to consider an impeachment inquiry. — From a May 30, 2019, tweet

Doris Matsui (D) 6th District (Sacramento) Supports Before revelations regarding Ukraine came to light, the contents of the Mueller Report and the President's continuous actions to block Congressional investigations were enough to begin impeachment proceedings. That's why I voted to stop Republican efforts to end that process. Knowing what we know now, we must move forward with an impeachment investigation before President Trump disrupts our next Presidential election – by openly and illegally seeking assistance from a foreign power. The eyes of future generations are watching. — From a Sept. 24, 2019, news release

Kevin McCarthy (R) 23rd District (Bakersfield) opposes Facts be damned. Democrats are insisting this is their moment to impeach President Trump. Speaker Pelosi's decree changes nothing. Here are the facts: Speaker Pelosi can't decide on impeachment unilaterally. It requires a full vote of the House of Representatives. The House has voted three times on articles of impeachment. Each vote failed. For Dems, this is all about politics. Not about facts. — From a Sept. 24, 2019, tweet

Tom McClintock (R) 4th District (Elk Grove) opposes If the majority wants to exercise the House's power of impeachment, all you've got to do is ask the House to do so. All you have to do is ask the House that it direct and authorize this committee to conduct an impeachment inquiry. That's all you have to do. Resolve that the House authorizes the Judiciary Committee to conduct an inquiry into the impeachment of the President…it's that simple. I dare you to do it. In fact, I double-dog-dare you to do it. Have the House vote on those 18 words and then go at it. — From a Sept. 12, 2019, committee hearing

Jerry McNerney (D) 9th District (Stockton) Supports When I came to Washington, I swore an oath to uphold the Constitution and I do not take that responsibility lightly. The allegations against the president are grave, and they are a threat to our democracy and national security. To fulfill our sworn duty, Congress must move forward with an impeachment inquiry. Brazen lies have been a hallmark of this presidency and it is now time for a reckoning. — From a Sept. 24, 2019, news release

Grace F. Napolitano (D) 32nd District (Norwalk) Supports Rep. Napolitano is a co-sponsor of an impeachment inquiry resolution by Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.). — From a June 4, 2019, Co-sponsor to House bill introduced by Rashida Tlaib

Devin Nunes (R) 22nd District (Tulare) opposes Once again, the Democrats, their media mouthpieces, and a cabal of leakers are ginning up a fake story with no regard to the monumental damage they’re causing to our public institutions and to trust in government. If the Democrats were really concerned with defending that process, they would have pursued this matter with a quiet, sober inquiry, as we do for all whistleblowers. ...They don’t want answers. They want a public spectacle. — From a Sept. 26, 2019, committee hearing

Jimmy Panetta (D) 20th District (Carmel) Supports I support this inquiry because, and as I have always stated, we must secure evidence upon which to base such a significant decision as the impeachment of a sitting president. If the evidence proves that the President explicitly or implicitly sought improper assistance from a foreign leader for his own personal and political gain, he should be impeached. This inquiry is about uncovering evidence, seeking the truth, and protecting our national security and the integrity of our democracy. — From a Sept. 24, 2019, news release

Nancy Pelosi (D) 12th District (San Francisco) Supports And this week, the president has admitted to asking the president of Ukraine to take actions which would benefit him politically. The action of – the actions of the Trump presidency revealed the dishonorable fact of the president's betrayal of his oath of office, betrayal of our national security, and betrayal of the integrity of our elections. Therefore, today, I am announcing the House of Representatives is moving forward with an official impeachment inquiry. I am directing our six committees to proceed with their investigations under that umbrella of impeachment inquiry. The president must be held accountable. No one is above the law. — From a Sept. 24, 2019, announcement

Scott Peters (D) 52nd District (San Diego) Supports We should never pursue impeachment for political reasons. Nor should we avoid it for political reasons. It's Congress' job to determine whether the president broke the law and acted against the interests of the United States. If we don't act, we send the message that criminal behavior is normal for presidents. Trump will be more emboldened to ignore Congress. And we will increase cynicism among those who depend on us to uphold the law and the Constitution. None of that is acceptable. — From a June 26, 2019, tweet

Katie Porter (D) 45th District (Irvine) Supports I have not come to this easily. I didn't come to Congress to impeach the president. I ran to use my decades of consumer advocacy to help Orange County families. I ran to fight back against Big Pharma and outrageous prescription drug pricing, to help families with the crushing costs of child care, and to take on the affordable housing crisis hurting our community, and I will continue to do those things and much more, but when faced with a crisis of this magnitude, I cannot with a clean conscience ignore my duty to defend the Constitution. — From a June 17, 2019, tweet

Harley Rouda (D) 48th District (Laguna Beach) Supports “Nothing's going to change between now and (June 30). So theoretically, I'm there,” Rouda said on June 24. He had set a June 30 deadline for the administration to comply with congressional inquiries before he would support an inquiry. — From a June 24, 2019, news report

Lucille Roybal-Allard (D) 40th District (Downey) Supports Supports an 'impeachment inquiry to determine whether or not there are legal grounds for impeachment.' — From a July 18, 2019, news report

Raul Ruiz (D) 36th District (Palm Desert) Supports I have long supported the continuing investigation into the misdeeds and potential crimes of the Trump Administration. I am deeply troubled by the recent reports detailing President Trump's pressuring of the Ukrainian government to interfere in our elections. The fact that the President himself confirmed these reports adds to the gravity of the situation. This is why, out of respect for our constitution, concern for our national security, and in the interest of my constituents, I am fully supportive of an official impeachment inquiry. President Trump's conduct has left us with no choice but to pursue every avenue to fully investigate potential abuses of power. Impeachment should not be used as a political weapon, and I urge members of both parties to approach the process with an open mind, to go where the facts lead us, and to put country ahead of party and politics. — From a Sept. 24, 2019, news release

Linda T. Sánchez (D) 38th District (Whittier) Supports It has become glaringly clear that Trump used his official office, including threatening our taxpayer dollars, to look for dirt from a foreign counterpart just so he could try to undermine a political opponent. The most recent whistleblower complaint is a serious national security matter that requires our immediate attention, yet the Director of National Intelligence continues to withhold information, undermining Congress, the rule of law and our democracy. Congress and the American people deserve to know whether the President encouraged a foreign country to interfere with the 2020 election. If it turns out that he did, I believe that President Trump must be impeached. — From a Sept. 24, 2019, news release

Adam B. Schiff (D) 28th District (Burbank) Supports It's bad enough Trump sought help from a foreign power in the last election. It's worse still that he obstructed the investigation into his misconduct. Now he‘s admitted using his office to coerce another country to interfere in 2020. I fully support the impeachment inquiry. — From a Sept. 24, 2019, tweet

Brad Sherman (D) 30th District (Northridge) Supports We now begin the effort to force the House Judiciary Committee to hold hearings on Obstruction of Justice and Russian interference in our election. Recent disclosures by Donald Trump Jr. indicate that Trump's campaign was eager to receive assistance from Russia. It now seems likely that the President had something to hide when he tried to curtail the investigation of National Security Advisor Michael Flynn and the wider Russian probe. I believe his conversations with, and subsequent firing of, FBI Director James Comey constitute Obstruction of Justice. — From a July 12, 2017, news release

Jackie Speier (D) 14th District (Hillsborough) Supports I believe that an inquiry into impeachment is required at this time. — From a May 21, 2019, CNN interview with Alisyn Camerota

Eric Swalwell (D) 15th District (Dublin) Supports President Trump's admission yesterday that he would listen to and potentially take a foreign power's offer of ‘dirt' on a political opponent rather than report it to the FBI is a brazen disregard for our rule of law, a betrayal of our nation, and an invitation to our adversaries to attack us once again. We must stop this lawless President from tearing down our democracy. Impeachment is the most extraordinary remedy the Constitution affords Congress. As a former prosecutor, I do not take this lightly. But this President continues to put his own interests above America's; he is lawless. His relentless attacks on our rule of law and numerous efforts to obstruct justice and Congress have reached such a point to require extraordinary action. It's time for Congress to open an impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump. — From a June 13, 2019, news release

Mark Takano (D) 41st District (Riverside) Supports The president's actions represent an egregious abuse of power and they serve as a textbook definition of corruption with the intent to undermine our democratic process. Soliciting interference in our elections by a foreign power is unlawful and un-American. As I have said before, under our system of checks and balances, Congress has a duty to use the powers granted by our Founders to seek remedy and restore the people's faith in our government. No person is above the law, and that includes the person who holds the highest office in the land. The path forward for Congress is clear; President Trump must be impeached. — From a Sept. 24, 2019, news release

Mike Thompson (D) 5th District (St. Helena) Supports If the President did in fact withhold Congressionally-approved military aid to Ukraine to leverage that nation's assistance in his re-election campaign, he should be impeached. If the President continues to refuse to cooperate with Congress in our Constitutional oversight responsibilities, the impeachment process should begin forthwith. — From a Sept. 24, 2019, news release

Norma Torres (D) 35th District (Pomona) Supports Congresswoman Torres supports opening an impeachment inquiry — From a May 31, 2019, email statement to Times staff from spokesperson

Juan Vargas (D) 51st District (San Diego) Supports We should start the impeachment process. I think it gets us to a place where we can get this information, and then frankly be able to make a determination. — From a May 22, 2019, news report