All seven district seats on the nine-member council are up for grabs next year. Candidates are already announcing, incumbents are already bailing. It could result in a major turnover.

There are any number of issues at stake, from homelessness and law enforcement to the business climate (Amazon!) to making strides on equity and climate change. Oh, and transportation, as we enter the “period of maximum constraint” tied to the Alaskan Way Viaduct coming down and the move of buses from the downtown tunnel to street traffic.

One major issue is — and should be — how we conduct ourselves. What will be the climate of discourse? I doubt the coming gridlock will improve the mood.

As I have written before, Seattle’s “niceness” was always a kind of myth. Seattle has seen violent strikes, riots, bombings, racial killings and more throughout the years. But the politics of recent times seems to have become generally nastier than it was in, say, the 1980s and ’90s. There was the ugly outpouring of misogyny over the council’s 2016 decision not to grant a proposed SoDo arena a street vacation, at the time a setback for basketball fans. There was Mike O’Brien getting ejected and manhandled at a party last May celebrating the opening of the Nordic Museum by associates of a grumpy Ballard shipyard owner, who later told me he was angry over O’Brien’s support for the gentrification of Ballard’s industrial and maritime district. This was shortly after an “explosive” Ballard town hall meeting in a church confronting council members over homelessness. This month a recently announced candidate for city council withdrew, citing what he saw as threats from the left over his association with the conservative Discovery Institute think tank. And there’s the ongoing abuse of independent journalist Erica Barnett, who has been mocked and stalked online over her reporting on homelessness, housing and NIMBY pushback.

It’s hard to gauge how much of this is a change in civic or national culture, or simply an ongoing trend amplified by technology: Every troll or critic can use the Twitter and social media bullhorn to spew invective. Our attachment to like-minded affinity groups has further entrenched us. It strikes me that it is neither a problem of the left nor right per se but of public anger that can be broadcast 24/7 at the touch of a screen from devices we carry with us everywhere. Abuse is just a tweet away (see Donald Trump).

One effect in a political monoculture is that Seattle is at risk of becoming a place where orthodoxies are publicly enforced and shame emphasized: I sometimes think we’ve reverted to Puritan roots, where the stocks and the dunking pool have made a comeback. Stray from Seattle consensus and you are not simply an outlier, but you can be cast as evil, an enabler, a collaborator with dark forces. On the other hand, some folks need to put their pitchforks away: Running the homeless out of town, for example, is no solution, nor humane to your fellow citizens.