C.A. No.-002357–002357 / 2017 https://www.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2016/29357/29357_2016_Judgement_04-Jul-2018.pdf

(Emphasis mine)

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

I. The interpretation of the Constitution has to be purposive taking into consideration the need of time and Constitutional principles. The intent of the Constitution framers, the object and reasons of a Constitutional 120 Amendment always throw light on the Constitutional provisions. For adopting the purposive interpretation of a particular provision the express language employed cannot be given a complete go-­bye.

II. The Parliament has power to make laws for NCTD in respect of any of the matters enumerated in State List and Concurrent List. The Legislative Assembly of NCTD has also legislative power with respect to matters enumerated in the State List (except excepted entries) and in the Concurrent List.

III. Executive power is co­extensive with the legislative power. Legislative power is given to give effect to legislative enactments. The Policy of legislation can be given effect to only by executive machinery.

IV. When the Constitution was enforced, executive power of Union in reference to Part C States with regard to Concurrent List was not excluded. Part C States having been substituted by 7th Constitution Amendment as Union Territories. The word ‘State’ as occurring in proviso to Article 73 after 7th Constitution Amendment cannot be read as including Union Territory. Reading the word ‘Union Territory’ within the word ‘State’ in proviso to Article 73 shall not be in consonance with scheme of Part VIII (Union Territories) of the Constitution.

V. Executive power of the Union is co­extensive on all subjects referable to List II and III on which Legislative Assembly of NCTD has also legislative powers. VI. The “aid and advice” given by Council of Ministers as referred to in sub­clause (4) of Article 239AA is binding on the LG unless he decides to exercise his power given in proviso to sub­clause (2) of Article 239AA. VII. The Legislative Assembly of NCTD being representing the views of elected representatives, their opinion and decisions have to be respected in all cases except where LG decides to make a reference to the President.

VIII. The power given in proviso to sub­clause (4) to LG is not to be exercised in a routine manner rather it is to be exercised by the LG on valid reasons after due consideration, when it becomes necessary to safeguard the interest of the Union Territory’.

IX. For the Executive decisions taken by the Council of Ministers/Ministers of GNCTD, proviso to sub­clause (4) gives adequate safeguard empowering the LG to make a reference to the President in the event there is difference of opinion between decisions of the Ministers and the LG, but the Constitutional Scheme does not suggest that the decisions by the Council of Ministers/Ministers require any concurrence of the LG.

X. The scheme as delineated by 1991 Act and 1993 Rules clearly indicates that LG has to be kept informed of all proposals, agendas and decisions taken. The purpose of communication of all decisions is to keep him posted with the administration of Delhi. The communication of all decisions is necessary to enable him to go through so as to enable him to exercise the powers as conceded to him 123 under proviso to sub­clause (4) as well as under 1991 Act and 1993 Rules. The purpose of communication is not to obtain concurrence of LG.

XI. From persons holding high office, it is expected that they shall conduct themselves in faithful discharge of their duties so as to ensure smooth running of administration so that rights of all can be protected.