What now? Wait 3 minutes or off to the bench for an alternate set of bench presses or pulls ?

Squatting will always remain the most versatile muscle builder & fat shredder



Optimizing Rest for Size and Strength Gains Optimizing Rest for Size and Strength Gains

When Rodents Squat, We Can Learn A Lot! When Rodents Squat, We Can Learn A Lot!

Farmer's Walk or Squat? Is Strong- men T. For You? Farmer's Walk or Squat? Is Strong- men T. For You?

Full ROM ➯ Full Gains - Form Counts! Full ROM ➯ Full Gains - Form Counts!

Battle the Rope to Get Ripped & Strong Battle the Rope to Get Ripped & Strong

Up Your Squat by 25% With Sodium Bicarbonate Up Your Squat by 25% With Sodium Bicarbonate

The traditional set workout (TS) consisted of four sets of squats at 80% of 1RM on a force plate with 3-minutes rest between sets.

consisted of four sets of squats at 80% of 1RM on a force plate with 3-minutes rest between sets. The alternating set workout (AS) also consisted of four sets of squats at 80% of 1RM but with bench press, and bench pull exercises performed between squat sets 1, 2 & 3 with between-exercise rest of 50 seconds, resulting in approximately 3-minutes rest between squat sets.

Figure 1: Maximal # of reps on last set and average power in the classic vs. alternating condition (Ciccone. 2014)

Individuals who aim to optimize squat AP should refrain from performing more than three AS sets per exercise. Those who aim to maximize squat repetitions to failure should refrain from performing upper body multi-joint exercises during squat rest intervals.

Figure 2: Changes in right leg 1RM during the experimental 6-month strength-training period in both groups and the relative changes after the short rest (SR) and long rest (LR) training periods (Ahtianen. 2005). Bottom line (updated 2018): The number of trainees I know whose interest in (1) average power and (2) maximal repetitions to failure exceeds their drive to improve their physiques is... well, let's say it's not exactly high. Now, short periods have been shown to promote the anabolic response to exercise. The latter, however, seems to be of far inferior importance than generations of bodybuilders have thought. The first (and imho best) evidence for the insignificance of post-workout increases in testosterone, GH & co. came from West et al. (2012) and has meanwhile been supported by a bunch of other studies (read up on West et al. in



Moreover, many more recent studies (cf. Lopes 2018) suggest that longer rest times (2-3 min) will promote greater hypertrophy, probably at least in part because they allow for greater volume and hence overall greater long-term gains - if the rest can be reduced by doing supersets is as of now not really clear | The number of trainees I know whose interest in (1) average power and (2) maximal repetitions to failure exceeds their drive to improve their physiques is... well, let's say it's not exactly high. Now, short periods have been shown to promote the anabolic response to exercise. The latter, however, seems to be of far inferior importance than generations of bodybuilders have thought. The first (and imho best) evidence for the insignificance of post-workout increases in testosterone, GH & co. came from West et al. (2012) and has meanwhile been supported by a bunch of other studies (read up on West et al. in this SV Article - at the time of the update a "classic").Moreover, many more recent studies (cf. Lopes 2018) suggest that longer rest times (2-3 min) will promote greater hypertrophy, probably at least in part because they allow for greater volume and hence overall greater long-term gains - if the rest can be reduced by doing supersets is as of now not really clear | Comment on Facebook

Ahtianen, Juha P., et al. "Short vs. long rest period between the sets in hypertrophic resistance training: influence on muscle strength, size, and hormonal adaptations in trained men." The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research 19.3 (2005): 572-582.

Ciccone AB, et al. "Effects of Traditional Versus Alternating Whole-body Strength Training on Squat Performance." J Strength Cond Res. (2014) Jun 17. Ahead of print.

de Salles, Belmiro Freitas, et al. "Rest interval between sets in strength training." Sports Medicine 39.9 (2009): 765-777.

Lopes, Charles Ricardo, et al. "Effect of Rest Interval Length Between Sets on Total Load Lifted and Blood Lactate Response During Total-Body Resistance Exercise Session." Asian Journal of Sports Medicine In Press (2018).

West, Daniel WD, and Stuart M. Phillips. "Associations of exercise-induced hormone profiles and gains in strength and hypertrophy in a large cohort after weight training." European journal of applied physiology 112.7 (2012): 2693-2702.

Traditional strength training with 80% of one-repetition maximum (1RM) utilizes 2- to 5-minute rest periods between sets. These long rest periods minimize decreases in volume and intensity, but result in long workouts. Performing upper-body exercises during lower-body rest intervals may decrease workout duration, but may affect workout performance.The above is how Anthony B. Ciccone, Lee E. Brown, Jared W. Coburn, Andrew J. Galpin kick off their latest paper in the venerable(Publish Ahead of Print).The purpose of the corresponding study was to compare the effects ofto those ofon squat performance. To this ends, Ciccone et al. recruites 20 youn men, who had to perform two workouts:For both workouts, sets 1-3 were performed for four repetitions, while set four was performed to concentric failure. The total number of completed repetitions, the peak ground reaction force (GRF), peak power, (PP), and average power (AP) of every squat repetition were recorded and averaged for each set.Interestingly, there was no significant interaction for GRF, PP, or AP. Only, the volume-equated AP was ca. 5% greater during the TS condition (989 ± 183) than the AS condition (937 ± 176). A more pronounced difference which was yet still within the margin of one standard deviation (in this case 2.2. reps) was observed for the fourth squat set to failure, where the TS condition resulted in 15% more reps to failure (7.5 ± 2.2) than the AS condition (6.5 ± 2.2). Reason enough for Ciccone et al. to suggest that:Certainly a sound advice, but in the end, we all live in a world where time is a precious gem and some people give a fuck about average power and the number of reps until they fail.