In its cynical attempts to evade responsibility for devastating Ecuador’s Amazon rainforest and its inhabitants, US oil giant Chevron has long relied on the time-tested tactics of shifting the blame, playing the victim, and changing the subject. After all, that’s what ya gotta do when the evidence of your guilt is so overwhelming.

Chevron spokespeople have claimed that poor sanitation is responsible for the cancer epidemic ravaging the region pock-marked by Chevron’s abandoned toxic waste pits. They’ve claimed that the courageous two-decade effort by local indigenous communities to hold the company accountable is a extortion conspiracy cooked up by trial lawyers. And they’ve vowed to fight the case “until hell freezes over” while declaring, “we can’t let little countries screw around with big companies like this.”

In the wake of Tuesday’s verdict from an Ecuadorean appeals court that upholds the historic $18 billion judgment against Chevron, expect lots more of the same. Especially since the 3-judge appeals court panel outlined so clearly the mountain of clear and incontrovertible evidence it used to affirm the lower court’s decision.

In its decision, the appeals panel explained that the case against Chevron had been substantially proven by scientific evidence submitted by the company’s own experts, and blasted Chevron for its “flagrant bad faith” and the “abusive” manner in which it attempted to defend itself for its crimes in the Ecuadorean Amazon.

Today, the Amazon Defense Coalition released a conclusive (but relatively concise!) summary report of the evidence against Chevron—including that supplied by the company itself and discovered through open judicial inspections of Chevron’s contaminated sites—that the courts in Ecuador relied upon in finding the company guilty.

Of course, the document has been prepared by the victors—the Ecuadorean plaintiffs—in this epic legal case, and they outline all the highlights they’ve been presenting at trial since 1993. But as you’ll see, the summary gets into exactly why Chevron doesn’t have a leg to stand on after the most litigated environmental case in history.

For instance, the summary section outlining the Judicial Site Inspections—official technical tests of contamination at former Chevron oil sites conducted with the participation of both sides before the judge, often surrounded by media and observers:

The trial court conducted 54 inspections of Chevron wells and oil production facilities and found oil contamination (measured as Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons, or TPH) in violation of applicable legal norms at every single site inspected. Ecuador law allows TPH in soil and waters at 1,000 mg/kg―a standard ten times more lax than the typical U.S. standard. As the trial court noted, some times samples at Chevron sites showed contamination up to 900 times higher than the Ecuadorian norm. The average TPH level across the nearly 800 samples taken from Chevron pits was 20,033 mg/kg―over 20 times the lax Ecuadorian standard. The average TPH level from the nearly 1000 samples taken in areas surrounding those pits was was 5,247 mg/kg, or five times that standard.

Indisputable. And there’s lots more of it.

Of course, there remains a long road ahead as the plaintiffs take this appeals court-affirmed, enforceable judgment to countries where Chevron has operations—it carefully pulled them from Ecuador—to ask courts in those jurisdictions to force the company to pay up or freeze its assets.

As Ecuadorean lawyer for the plaintiffs—as well as CNN Hero and Goldman Prize Winner—Pablo Fajardo said in the wake of the appeals court verdict:

Finally, there will be justice and hopefully (the) repair of the Ecuadoran Amazon. It’s not going to be easy to enforce this judgment, but even if hell freezes over, we are going to try.”

The Amazon Defense Coalition issued a press release to announce the summary document, which you can read here. Or just check out the 4-page document here: Summary of Overwhelming Evidence Against Chevron In Ecuador Trial.