mizzou: mizzou: I believe those that are frustrated with WT should be allowed to openly express that frustration in their thoughts and opinions, albeit in a civilized manor, without being chastised.

I agree wholeheartedly. It was the civilized manner portion that I was addressing. Many here have found ways to level criticism at WayTools and to do so in a civilized manner.

I am curious to know which two sentences you found condescending. Was it

Jim: Jim: Excellent! You read the post.

or

Jim: Jim: I find it takes very little effort, thought or caring to be negative and destructive. But, to add something constructive, thought provoking, and beneficial to a conversation takes a real investment of those things.

In the first I am glad that you took the time to read and comment on my post. The wording of your post made it clear that you had done so. No condescension intended, but not backing away from my point either. It seemed like you were expecting some sort of apology.

In the second I am simply stating what I have found to be true in my own experience. Do you disagree with the statements? Many times I have been tempted to rifle off a quick negative response and even started many of them. But, then (usually) I abandon it and think a while before responding. Sometimes I end up just letting it go. Other times I return to it after giving it some thought. This whole discussion is one of the latter. I do not see condescension there. I do not feel that I am superior to anyone. I do feel that everyone has the right to call out behaviors they feel are not constructive.

A Like does not lend validity to a post, but it does indicate if others agree with it or support what was written.