Forcing down annual levels of immigration to the tens of thousands, as promised in the Conservative manifesto, would inflict a significant cost on the economy and the public finances

Any news headline connecting the cutting of immigration numbers to damaging the economy that is published in the context of today’s disastrous and failed Western immigration policies is a fallacy, and an example of the socialist left’s attempt to confuse the discourse.

While immigration is necessary for economic sustainability, the calls to cut immigration are eminently reasonable, precisely because of the track record of the Muslim migrants who have been let into the UK and other Western nations. It is not because Westerners are broadly rejecting of immigrants. To spell it out: Muslims who escalate crime rates, create no-go zones and Sharia enclaves, and erect mosques that are funded by Saudi Arabia are the drags on the economy. Their mission is jihad by immigration. In a “bombshell” report by the Express, “non-European” mass immigration (aka Muslim migrants) is costing taxpayers 17 billion dollars annually.

Cutting harmful immigration is necessary for the survival of the West, survival as much as is bringing in a controlled number of immigrants who integrate and contribute economically.

“Cutting immigration to tens of thousands would inflict £115bn of damage on the economy says think tank”, by Ben Chu, Independent, May 24, 2017: