Update: This story has been labeled as “fake news” by one of the numerous websites that suddenly appeared overnight to decide what is real and what is fake online, as well as what people are allowed to share and what it is forbidden, according to various agendas.

For example, saying that there is no – or very little – evidence of manmade global warming, will label the article as fake news, even though there are numerous climate scientists who disagree that humans are to blame for “global warming”.

I will include numerous scientists (most are climate scientists, or climatologists) below who disagree that humans are to blame for global warming (please click the links and read or listen to what they have to say, then make up your own mind), and some go as far as calling it “pseudoscience” or outright a “scam”:

I would also like to add that none of the predictions made by Al Gore in his documentary, “An Inconvenient Truth”, have come true. His predictions/claims were based on the scientific predictions about “global warming” made by what some call “climate alarmists“, and “exaggerated” computer models.

How is this fair? How is this tolerated? How is this journalism? How is this LEGAL?

As a result, my Facebook page has “reduced distribution and other restrictions”. Facebook should not cave to pressure and fight those who want to censor the internet and re-write history. (Link, link, link)

Professor Emiritus of physics Harold ‘Hal’ Lewis of the University of California at Santa Barbara has called global warming a “scam” in his resignation letter, which was addressed to the American Physical Society.

He stated: “It is of course, the global warming scam, with the (literally) trillions of dollars driving it, that has corrupted so many scientists, and has carried APS before it like a rogue wave. It is the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist.” (Source)

I will also include the following quote from John Coleman, founder of the Weather Channel:

“I love our wonderful planet Earth! If I thought it was threatened by global warming, I would devote my life to stopping it. There is no global warming.” (Source)

Addressing the direct claims made against the article: Just because the petition was started in 1998, it doesn’t mean the story is fake. If the opinions of the signers would have changed, then they would have retracted their support for the petition. To this date, they haven’t.

Also, why are they using quotation marks when referring to the signers as “scientists”? And what qualifies the writers of their article to disprove the signers of the petition as scientists?

The science is clearly not settled, and banning people from talking about it, based on evidence, is not only unethical, but… unscientific.

What was the purpose of their petition? Let’s see:

Purpose of Petition: The purpose of the Petition Project is to demonstrate that the claim of “settled science” and an overwhelming “consensus” in favor of the hypothesis of human-caused global warming and consequent climatological damage is wrong. No such consensus or settled science exists. As indicated by the petition text and signatory list, a very large number of American scientists reject this hypothesis.

Publicists at the United Nations, Mr. Al Gore, and their supporters frequently claim that only a few “skeptics” remain – skeptics who are still unconvinced about the existence of a catastrophic human-caused global warming emergency.

It is evident that 31,487 Americans with university degrees in science – including 9,029 PhDs, are not “a few.” Moreover, from the clear and strong petition statement that they have signed, it is evident that these 31,487 American scientists are not “skeptics.”

These scientists are instead convinced that the human-caused global warming hypothesis is without scientific validity and that government action on the basis of this hypothesis would unnecessarily and counterproductively damage both human prosperity and the natural environment of the Earth.

Update 2:

More than 1,000 scientists challenged man-made global warming claims made by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and former Vice President Al Gore: More Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims (pdf)

500 Climate Scientists & Professionals Sign Letter to UN: ‘There Is No Climate Emergency’

Below is the original article:

A staggering 30,000+ scientists have come forward confirming that man-made climate change is a hoax perpetuated by the elite in order to make money.

One of the experts is Weather Channel founder, John Coleman, who warns that huge fortunes are being made by man-made climate change proponents such as Al Gore.

In a recent interview with Climate Depot, Coleman said:

“Al Gore may emerge from the shadows to declare victory in the ‘global warming’ debate if Hillary Clinton moves into the White House. Yes, if that happens and the new climate regulations become the law of the land, they will be next to impossible to overturn for four to eight years.”

Climate change proponents remain undeterred in their mission, ignoring numerous recent scientific findings indicating that there has been no warming trend at all for nearly two decades.

Al Gore’s dire predictions of the melting of polar ice on a massive scale have proved to be completely false.

In fact, in 2014 – a year that was touted as being “the hottest ever” in the Earth’s history – there were record amounts of ice reported in Antarctica, an increase in Arctic ice, and record snowfalls across the globe.

Top Scientist Resigns: ‘Global Warming is a $Trillions Scam — It has Corrupted Many Scientists’

Debunking the “97 percent” lie

On top of those “inconvenient truths,” the White House’s assertion that 97 percent of scientists agree that global warming is real has been completely debunked.

Several independently-researched examinations of the literature used to support the “97 percent” statement found that the conclusions were cherry-picked and misleading.

More objective surveys have revealed that there is a far greater diversity of opinion among scientists than the global warming crowd would like for you to believe.

From the National Review:

“A 2008 survey by two German scientists, Dennis Bray and Hans von Storch, found that a significant number of scientists were skeptical of the ability of existing global climate models to accurately predict global temperatures, precipitation, sea-level changes, or extreme weather events even over a decade; they were far more skeptical as the time horizon increased.”

Other mainstream news sources besides the National Review have also been courageous enough to speak out against the global warming propaganda – even the Wall Street Journal published an op-ed piece in 2015 challenging the Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) pseudoscience being promulgated by global warming proponents.

And, of course, there are the more than 31,487 American scientists (to date) who have signed a petition challenging the climate change narrative and 9,029 of them hold PhDs in their respective fields.

But hey, Al Gore and his cronies have also ignored that inconvenient truth, as well.

Many of those scientists who signed the petition were likely encouraged to speak out in favor of the truth after retired senior NASA atmospheric scientist John L. Casey revealed that solar cycles are largely responsible for warming periods on Earth – not human activity.

Al Gore and cronies continue getting richer from the global warming hoax

But the global warming crowd continues to push their agenda on the public while lining their pockets in the process.

If you’re still inclined to believe what Al Gore has to say about global warming, please consider the fact that since he embarked on his crusade, his wealth has grown from $2 million in 2001 to $100 million in 2016 – largely due to investments in fake “green tech” companies and the effective embezzlement of numerous grants and loans. Al Gore is likely to become the world’s first ‘carbon billionaire’.

Source and references: NaturalNews (excerpt); Global Warming Petition; Peer-Reviewed Research;