It’s June 21 and the Miami Marlins have played 70 games. While it’s far too early to make any grand statements about the team, they are very much in the thick of the Wild Card race and for the first time in years, the team has several players deserving of an All-Star spot. Here’s a look at the Marlin who has been the best and the Marlin who has been the worst through the first 70 games.

Best Marlin So Far: Marcell Ozuna

Center fielder Marcell Ozuna was the subject of plenty of trade rumors before the season began, with rumors even spreading so far as to say that owner Jeffrey Loria wanted Ozuna gone. While those rumors may have been overblown, it was no secret that the team was shopping Ozuna. Eventually, they kept him, and that’s been the best move the team has made in a while. Through 70 games, “Ozo” is hitting .322/.374/.567 with 15 home runs and 43 RBIs. He’s also playing excellent defense and has worked his way to a 3.1 fWAR, leading the Marlins by a full point over Christian Yelich’s 2.1. Ozuna is likely to represent the Marlins in San Diego for the All-Star Game and has been the best Marlins position player so far, on the way to a career-best season.

Worst Marlin So Far: Cole Gillespie

Cole Gillespie is having a rough year. In only 27 games (41 plate appearances) he has accumulated -0.3 fWAR, the lowest on the Marlins roster for position players. He is slashing just .263/.293/.421 with no home runs and just 5 RBIs. He has struck out in 29.3% of his at-bats and walked in only 4.9% of those. He’s also been a liability on defense, proving the Marlins with no real positives either offensively or defensively. To be fair to Gillespie, he’s basically the 25th man on the roster, with Ichiro serving as the main bat off the bench and Miguel Rojas and Chris Johnson working ahead of Gillespie as well. Still, Gillespie’s numbers have been undeniably rough and he is the official “worst Marlin position player,” at least for now. Among starters, Marlins All-Stars Giancarlo Stanton and Dee Gordon are tied for worst with only 0.2 fWAR.