Campaigners unveil child poverty map of UK Published duration 15 October 2014

image copyright Getty Images image caption The new statistics suggested one in three children in the Glasgow area were living in poverty

Campaigners have published a child poverty map of the UK, which they said showed "shocking levels of hardship" across the country.

The figures are broken down by parliamentary constituency, local authority and ward and show a wide disparity in poverty rates.

London scores badly , with 10 of the top 20 constituencies with the highest child poverty rates.

Glasgow was the worst-affected area in Scotland.

However there is variation within regions. For example, in London, Bethnal Green and Bow has a child poverty rate of 49% compared to 15% in Richmond upon Thames.

In Manchester, the rate is 39%, while Birmingham was at 37%, Nottingham 36% and Middlesbrough 35%.

Wokingham and the Shetland Islands are the local authorities with the lowest rates, at 10%.

At a more local level, the map reveals more significant concentrations of child poverty, with the majority of children poor in 16 local wards.

image copyright Getty Images

The Campaign to End Child Poverty said 220,000 youngsters in Scotland - or one in five of the child population - were living in poverty.

The map indicated that one in three youngsters in Glasgow were living in hardship, putting the city just outside the 20 worst local authorities in the UK.

In another five Scottish council areas, the figures suggested more than a quarter of all children were growing up in families that were struggling to get by.

They were identified as Clackmannanshire, Dundee, East Ayrshire, Inverclyde and North Ayrshire.

The statistics also showed high poverty levels in rural Scottish communities, with nearly one in five children in the Western Isles and Argyll and Bute affected.

The estimates were compiled for the Campaign to End Child Poverty by the Centre for Research in Social Policy (CRSP) at Loughborough University.

The campaign group said it was the first time local child poverty had been mapped by taking housing costs into account.

Benefit policies

End Child Poverty, which includes children's charities, child welfare organisations, social justice groups, faith groups and trade unions, said politicians at Westminster and Holyrood needed to act to tackle the root causes of poverty,

It called on the UK government to rethink tax and benefit policies, claiming these could leave as many as 100,000 more children in poverty by 2020.

End Child Poverty spokesman Neil Mathers said: "These figures reveal just how widely and deeply child poverty reaches into our communities.

"It's important we look behind these figures at what is driving this level of poverty in our country.

"Politicians of all parties, at Westminster and Holyrood, need to act to tackle the root causes of poverty, including low pay and soaring housing and childcare costs.

"There is nothing inevitable about this poverty. We must build on the good work that is happening in Scotland to support families."

Responding to the figures, A UK government spokesman said: "The figures do not provide an accurate picture of child poverty. We're doing more than ever to help children, the attainment gap for deprived pupils has fallen and we've just seen the largest fall in unemployment since 1988.

"We remain committed to our goal of ending child poverty by 2020. We've already made great strides under this government with 300,000 fewer children in relative poverty and 290,000 fewer children growing up in workless families."

A Scottish government spokeswoman said: "It is totally unacceptable that there are children living in poverty in a country as wealthy as Scotland.

"We know that the UK government's benefit reforms are unfairly impacting on some of the most vulnerable members of our society and that is why we are investing £81m in the next financial year to help mitigate the effects of these changes.

"In the Scottish government's submission to the Smith Commission, we set out the need for Scotland to have full responsibility over welfare and employment powers.