What Kenneth Starr Believes Robert Mueller Will Do To President Trump

By: Lawrence Cloverfield Sept 30, 2017

Kenneth Starr, the Clinton White House special prosecutor, believes that Donald Trump will be placed under oath when he’s eventually questioned for the Russia investigation.

“Yes or no answer, if this is possible, do you see the president being placed under oath before this is over?” MSNBC’s Brian Williams asked during an interview Thursday night.

To which Starr answered “Yes”.

Featured Image credit to SteadFastandLoyal

Video Source – SteadFastandLoyal

***

Clinton Special Prosecutor: Trump Will Be Under Oath Before Russia Probe Ends [VIDEO]

By: Chuck Ross 09/29/2017

Starr was analyzing the investigation being conducted by special counsel Robert Mueller. A former FBI director, Mueller is investigating Russian interference in the presidential campaign last year. The probe has expanded to include Trump associates’ business activities as well the circumstances of Trump’s firing of former FBI Director James Comey and former national security adviser Michael Flynn.

Video Source – DailyCaller

***

SPEAKING OF KENNETH STARR — LET’S LOOK BACK AND REMEMBER …. THE STARR REPORT — The complete, unedited text of the final, corrected version of independent counsel Kenneth Starr’s report to the House on President Clinton. (NOTE: Section links can be clicked on and read exhibits within the Star Report!!!) ………….

Narrative

Editor’s Note: Some of the language in this section is sexually explicit.

I. Nature of President Clinton’s Relationship with Monica Lewinsky

A. Introduction

B. Evidence Establishing Nature of Relationship

1. Physical Evidence

2. Ms. Lewinsky’s Statements

3. Ms. Lewinsky’s Confidants

4. Documents

5. Consistency and Corroboration

C. Sexual Contacts

1. The President’s Accounts

a. Jones Testimony

b. Grand Jury Testimony

2. Ms. Lewinsky’s Account

D. Emotional Attachment

E. Conversations and Phone Messages

F. Gifts

G. Messages

H. Secrecy

1. Mutual Understanding

2. Cover Stories

3. Steps to Avoid Being Seen or Heard

4. Ms. Lewinsky’s Notes and Letters

5. Ms. Lewinsky’s Evaluation of Their Secrecy Efforts

II. 1995: Initial Sexual Encounters

A. Overview of Monica Lewinsky’s White House Employment

B. First Meetings with the President

C. November 15 Sexual Encounter

D. November 17 Sexual Encounter

E. December 31 Sexual Encounter

F. President’s Account of 1995 Relationship

III. January-March 1996: Continued Sexual Encounters

A. January 7 Sexual Encounter

B. January 21 Sexual Encounter

C. February 4 Sexual Encounter and Subsequent Phone Calls

D. President’s Day (February 19) Break-up

E. Continuing Contacts

F. March 31 Sexual Encounter

IV. April 1996: Ms. Lewinsky’s Transfer to the Pentagon

A. Earlier Observations of Ms. Lewinsky in the West Wing

B. Decision to Transfer Ms. Lewinsky

C. Ms. Lewinsky’s Notification of Her Transfer

D. Conversations with the President about Her Transfer

1. Easter Telephone Conversations and Sexual Encounter

2. April 12-13: Telephone Conversations

V. April-December 1996: No Private Meetings

A. Pentagon Job

B. No Physical Contact

C. Telephone Conversations

D. Public Encounters

E. Ms. Lewinsky’s Frustrations

VI. Early 1997: Resumption of Sexual Encounters

A. Resumption of Meetings with the President

1. Role of Betty Currie

a. Arranging Meetings

b. Intermediary for Gifts

c. Secrecy

2. Observations by Secret Service Officers

B. Valentine’s Day Advertisement

C. February 24 Message

D. February 28 Sexual Encounter

E. March 29 Sexual Encounter

F. Continuing Job Efforts

VII. May 1997: Termination of Sexual Relationship

A. Questions about Ms. Lewinsky’s Discretion

B. May 24: Break-up

VIII. June-October 1997: Continuing Meetings and Calls

A. Continuing Job Efforts

B. July 3 Letter

C. July 4 Meeting

D. July 14-15 Discussions of Linda Tripp

E. July 16 Meeting with Marsha Scott

F. July 24 Meeting

G. Newsweek Article and Its Aftermath

H. August 16 Meeting

I. Continuing Job Efforts

J. Black Dog Gifts

K. Lucy Mercer Letter and Involvement of Chief of Staff

L. News of Job Search Failure

IX. October-November 1997: United Nations’ Job Offer

A. October 10: Telephone Conversation

B. October 11 Meeting

C. October 16-17: The “Wish List

D. The President Creates Options

E. The U.N. Interview and Job Offer

F. The U.N. Job Offer Declined

X. November 1997: Growing Frustration

A. Interrogatories Answered

B. First Vernon Jordan Meeting

C. November 13: The Zedillo Visit

D. November 14-December 4: Inability to See the President

XI. December 5-18, 1997: The Witness List and Job Search

A. December 5: The Witness List

B. December 5: Christmas Party at the White House

C. December 6: The Northwest Gate Incident

1. Initial Visit and Rejection

2. Ms. Lewinsky Returns to the White House

3. “Whatever Just Happened Didn’t Happen”

D. The President Confers with His Lawyers

E. Second Jordan Meeting

F. Early Morning Phone Call

G. Job Interviews

XII. December 19, 1997 – January 4, 1998: The Subpoena

A. December 19: Ms. Lewinsky Is Subpoenaed

B. December 22: Meeting with Vernon Jordan

C. December 22: First Meeting with Francis Carter

D. December 23: Clinton Denials to Paula Jones

E. December 28: Final Meeting with the President

E. December 28: Concealment of Gifts

D. December 31: Breakfast with Vernon Jordan

E. January 4: The Final Gift

XIII. January 5-January 16, 1998: The Affidavit

A. January 5: Francis Carter Meeting

B. January 5: Call from the President

C. January 6: The Draft Affidavit

D. January 7: Ms. Lewinsky Signs Affidavit

E. January 8: The Perelman Call

F. January 9: “Mission Accomplished”

G. January 12: Pre-Trial Hearing in Jones Case

H. January 13: References from the White House

I. January 13: Final Jordan Meeting

J. January 13-14: Lewinsky-Tripp Conversation and Talking Points

K. January 15: The Isikoff Call

L. January 15-16: Developments in the Jones Law Suit

XIV. January 17, 1998-Present: The Deposition and Afterward

A. January 17: The Deposition

B. The President Meets with Ms. Currie

C. January 18-19: Attempts to Reach Ms. Lewinsky

D. January 20-22: Lewinsky Story Breaks

1. “Clinton Accused”

2. Denials to Aides

3. Initial Denials to the American Public

4. “We Just Have To Win”

Source – WashingtonPost

***

Kenneth Winston Starr (born July 21, 1946) is an American lawyer who has also been a United States circuit judge and U.S. solicitor general. He is the former president and chancellor of Baylor University, and formerly held the Louise L. Morrison chair of constitutional law at Baylor University Law School. He carried out a controversial investigation of members of the Clinton administration.

Starr served as a federal Court of Appeals judge and as solicitor general for George H. W. Bush. He received the most publicity for his tenure as independent counsel while Bill Clinton was U.S. president. Starr was initially appointed to investigate the suicide death of deputy White House counsel Vince Foster and the Whitewater real estate investments of Bill Clinton. The three-judge panel charged with administering the Independent Counsel Act later expanded the inquiry into numerous areas including an extramarital affair that Bill Clinton had with Monica Lewinsky. After several years of investigation, Starr filed the Starr Report, which alleged that Bill Clinton lied about the existence of the affair during a sworn deposition. The allegation opened the door for the impeachment of Bill Clinton and the five-year suspension of Clinton’s law license.

Starr served as the president and chancellor of Baylor University in Waco, Texas, from June 2010 until May 2016. On May 26, 2016, following an investigation into the mishandling by Starr of several sexual assaults at the school, Baylor University’s board of regents announced that Starr’s tenure as university president would end on May 31. The board said he would continue as chancellor, but on June 1, Starr told ESPN that he would resign that position effective immediately. On August 19, 2016, Starr announced he will resign from his tenured professor position at Baylor Law School, completely severing his ties with the university in a “mutually agreed separation”.

Source – Wikipedia