1 Arrhenius, S. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground. Philos. Mag. Ser. 5 41, 237–276 (1896).

2 Callendar, G. S. The artificial production of carbon dioxide and its influence on temperature. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 64, 223–240 (1938).

3 Knutti, R. & Rugenstein, M. A. A. Feedbacks, climate sensitivity and the limits of linear models. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 373, 20150146 (2015).

4 Richardson, M., Cowtan, K., Hawkins, E. & Stolpe, M. B. Reconciled climate response estimates from climate models and the energy budget of Earth. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 931–935 (2016).

5 Hope, C. The $10 trillion value of better information about the transient climate response. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 373, 20140429 (2015).

6 Knutti, R. & Hegerl, G. C. The equilibrium sensitivity of the Earth's temperature to radiation changes. Nat. Geosci. 1, 735–743 (2008).

7 IPCC Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge University Press, 2013).

8 PALEOSENS Project Members. Making sense of palaeoclimate sensitivity. Nature 491, 683–691 (2012).

9 Charney, J. et al. Carbon Dioxide and Climate: A Scientific Assessment (National Acadamies of Sciences Press, 1979).

10 Hegerl, G. & Zwiers, F. Use of models in detection and attribution of climate change. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 2, 570–591 (2011).

11 Otto, A. et al. Energy budget constraints on climate response. Nat. Geosci. 6, 415–416 (2013).

12 Huber, M., Beyerle, U. & Knutti, R. Estimating climate sensitivity and future temperature in the presence of natural climate variability. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 2086–2092 (2014).

13 Olson, R. et al. What is the effect of unresolved internal climate variability on climate sensitivity estimates? J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 118, 4348–4358 (2013).

14 Stevens, B. Rethinking the lower bound on aerosol radiative forcing. J. Clim. 28, 4794–4819 (2015).

15 Medhaug, I., Stolpe, M. B., Fischer, E. M. & Knutti, R. Reconciling controversies about the 'global warming hiatus'. Nature 545, 41–47 (2017).

16 Johansson, D. J. A., O'Neill, B. C., Tebaldi, C. & Häggström, O. Equilibrium climate sensitivity in light of observations over the warming hiatus. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 449–453 (2015).

17 Lewis, N. & Curry, J. A. The implications for climate sensitivity of AR5 forcing and heat uptake estimates. Clim. Dyn. 45, 1009–1023 (2015).

18 Lewis, N. Objective inference for climate parameters: Bayesian, transformation-of-variables, and profile likelihood approaches. J. Clim. 27, 7270–7284 (2014).

19 Annan, J. D. & Hargreaves, J. C. On the generation and interpretation of probabilistic estimates of climate sensitivity. Clim. Change 104, 423–436 (2011).

20 Annan, J. D. Recent developments in Bayesian estimation of climate sensitivity. Curr. Clim. Change Rep. 1, 263–267 (2015).

21 Skeie, R. B., Berntsen, T., Aldrin, M., Holden, M. & Myhre, G. A lower and more constrained estimate of climate sensitivity using updated observations and detailed radiative forcing time series. Earth Syst. Dyn. 5, 139–175 (2014).

22 Karl, T. R. et al. Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus. Science 348, 1469–1472 (2015).

23 Tebaldi, C. & Knutti, R. The use of the multi-model ensemble in probabilistic climate projections. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 365, 2053–2075 (2007).

24 Dessler, A. E. A determination of the cloud feedback from climate variations over the past decade. Science 330, 1523–1527 (2010).

25 Mauritsen, T. & Stevens, B. Missing Iris effect as a possible cause of muted hydrological change and high climate sensitivity in models. Nat. Geosci. 8, 346–351 (2015).

26 Zelinka, M. D., Zhou, C. & Klein, S. A. Insights from a refined decomposition of cloud feedbacks. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 9259–9269 (2016).

27 Caldwell, P. M., Zelinka, M. D., Taylor, K. E. & Marvel, K. Quantifying the sources of intermodel spread in equilibrium climate sensitivity. J. Clim. 29, 513–524 (2016).

28 Stevens, B. & Bony, S. Water in the atmosphere. Phys. Today 66, 29 (2013).

29 Donohoe, A., Armour, K. C., Pendergrass, A. G. & Battisti, D. S. Shortwave and longwave radiative contributions to global warming under increasing CO2 . Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 16700–16705 (2014).

30 Harris, G. R., Sexton, D. M. H., Booth, B. B. B., Collins, M. & Murphy, J. M. Probabilistic projections of transient climate change. Clim. Dyn. 40, 2937–2972 (2013).

31 Hawkins, E., Dong, B., Robson, J., Sutton, R. & Smith, D. The interpretation and use of biases in decadal climate predictions. J. Clim. 27, 2931–2947 (2014).

32 Stevens, B., Sherwood, S. C., Bony, S. & Webb, M. J. Prospects for narrowing bounds on Earth's equilibrium climate sensitivity. Earth's Future 4, 512–522 (2016).

33 Cess, R. D. et al. Interpretation of cloud-climate feedback as produced by 14 atmospheric general circulation models. Science 245, 513–516 (1989).

34 Samset, B. H., Myhre, G. & Schulz, M. Upward adjustment needed for aerosol radiative forcing uncertainty. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 230–232 (2014).

35 Carslaw, K. S. et al. Large contribution of natural aerosols to uncertainty in indirect forcing. Nature 503, 67–71 (2013).

36 Gregory, J. M. A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L03205 (2004).

37 Boer, G. J., Hamilton, K. & Zhu, W. Climate sensitivity and climate change under strong forcing. Clim. Dyn. 24, 685–700 (2005).

38 Armour, K. C., Bitz, C. M. & Roe, G. H. Time-varying climate sensitivity from regional feedbacks. J. Clim. 26, 4518–4534 (2013).

39 Rose, B. E. J., Armour, K. C., Battisti, D. S., Feldl, N. & Koll, D. D. B. The dependence of transient climate sensitivity and radiative feedbacks on the spatial pattern of ocean heat uptake. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 1071–1078 (2014).

40 Feldl, N. & Roe, G. H. The nonlinear and nonlocal nature of climate feedbacks. J. Clim. 26, 8289–8304 (2013).

41 Rugenstein, M. A. A., Caldeira, K. & Knutti, R. Dependence of global radiative feedbacks on evolving patterns of surface heat fluxes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 9877–9885 (2016).

42 Rose, B. E. J. & Rayborn, L. The effects of ocean heat uptake on transient climate sensitivity. Curr. Clim. Change Rep. 2, 190–201 (2016).

43 Winton, M. et al. Has coarse ocean resolution biased simulations of transient climate sensitivity? Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 8522–8529 (2014).

44 Knutti, R. & Tomassini, L. Constraints on the transient climate response from observed global temperature and ocean heat uptake. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L09701 (2008).

45 Murphy, J. M. Transient response of the Hadley Centre coupled ocean–atmosphere model to increasing carbon dioxide. Part III: Analysis of global-mean response using simple models. J. Clim. 8, 496–514 (1995).

46 Senior, C. A. & Mitchell, J. F. B. The time-dependence of climate sensitivity. Geophys. Res. Lett. 27, 2685–2688 (2000).

47 Andrews, T., Gregory, J. M. & Webb, M. J. The dependence of radiative forcing and feedback on evolving patterns of surface temperature change in climate models. J. Clim. 28, 1630–1648 (2015).

48 Gregory, J. M., Andrews, T. & Good, P. The inconstancy of the transient climate response parameter under increasing CO2 . Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 373, 20140417 (2015).

49 Winton, M., Takahashi, K. & Held, I. M. Importance of ocean heat uptake efficacy to transient climate change. J. Clim. 23, 2333–2344 (2010).

50 Geoffroy, O. et al. Transient climate response in a two-layer energy-balance model. Part I: Analytical solution and parameter calibration using CMIP5 AOGCM experiments. J. Clim. 26, 1841–1857 (2013).

51 Geoffroy, O. et al. Transient climate response in a two-layer energy-balance model. Part II: Representation of the efficacy of deep-ocean heat uptake and validation for CMIP5 AOGCMs. J. Clim. 26, 1859–1876 (2013).

52 Yoshimori, M. et al. A review of progress towards understanding the transient global mean surface temperature response to radiative perturbation. Prog. Earth Planet. Sci. 3, 21 (2016).

53 Bloch-Johnson, J., Pierrehumbert, R. T. & Abbot, D. S. Feedback temperature dependence determines the risk of high warming. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 4973–4980 (2015).

54 Gregory, J. M. & Andrews, T. Variation in climate sensitivity and feedback parameters during the historical period. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 3911–3920 (2016).

55 Boer, G. J. & Yu, B. Climate sensitivity and climate state. Clim. Dyn. 21, 167–176 (2003).

56 Loeb, N. G., Su, W. & Kato, S. Understanding climate feedbacks and sensitivity using observations of Earth's energy budget. Curr. Clim. Change Rep. 2, 170–178 (2016).

57 Long, D. J. & Collins, M. Quantifying global climate feedbacks, responses and forcing under abrupt and gradual CO2 forcing. Clim. Dyn. 41, 2471–2479 (2013).

58 Williams, K. D., Ingram, W. J. & Gregory, J. M. Time variation of effective climate sensitivity in GCMs. J. Clim. 21, 5076–5090 (2008).

59 Armour, K. C. Energy budget constraints on climate sensitivity in light of inconstant climate feedbacks. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 331–335 (2017).

60 Proistosescu, C. & Huybers, P. J. Slow climate mode reconciles historical and model-based estimates of climate sensitivity. Sci. Adv. 3, e1602821 (2017).

61 Meraner, K., Mauritsen, T. & Voigt, A. Robust increase in equilibrium climate sensitivity under global warming. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 5944–5948 (2013).

62 Zhou, C., Zelinka, M. D. & Klein, S. A. Impact of decadal cloud variations on the Earth's energy budget. Nat. Geosci. 9, 871–874 (2016).

63 Mauritsen, T. et al. Climate feedback efficiency and synergy. Clim. Dyn. 41, 2539–2554 (2013).

64 Schaller, N., Sedlacek, J. & Knutti, R. The asymmetry of the climate system's response to solar forcing changes and its implications for geoengineering scenarios. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 119, 5171–5184 (2014).

65 Shindell, D. T. Inhomogeneous forcing and transient climate sensitivity. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 274–277 (2014).

66 Davin, E. L., de Noblet-Ducoudré, N. & Friedlingstein, P. Impact of land cover change on surface climate: Relevance of the radiative forcing concept. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L13702 (2007).

67 Marvel, K. et al. Do responses to different anthropogenic forcings add linearly in climate models? Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 104010 (2015).

68 Marvel, K., Schmidt, G. A., Miller, R. L. & Nazarenko, L. S. Implications for climate sensitivity from the response to individual forcings. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 386–389 (2015).

69 Crook, J. A., Forster, P. M. & Stuber, N. Spatial patterns of modeled climate feedback and contributions to temperature response and polar amplification. J. Clim. 24, 3575–3592 (2011).

70 Colman, R. & McAvaney, B. Climate feedbacks under a very broad range of forcing. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L01702 (2009).

71 Huneeus, N. et al. Forcings and feedbacks in the GeoMIP ensemble for a reduction in solar irradiance and increase in CO2 . J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 119, 5226–5239 (2014).

72 Kummer, J. R. & Dessler, A. E. The impact of forcing efficacy on the equilibrium climate sensitivity. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 3565–3568 (2014).

73 Stott, P. A., Jones, G. S. & Mitchell, J. F. B. Do models underestimate the solar contribution to recent climate change? J. Clim. 16, 4079–4093 (2003).

74 Wang, W.-C., Dudek, M. P., Liang, X.-Z. & Kiehl, J. T. Inadequacy of effective CO2 as a proxy in simulating the greenhouse effect of other radiatively active gases. Nature 350, 573–577 (1991).

75 Good, P. et al. Nonlinear regional warming with increasing CO2 concentrations. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 138–142 (2015).

76 Gregory, J. M., Andrews, T., Good, P., Mauritsen, T. & Forster, P. M. Small global-mean cooling due to volcanic radiative forcing. Clim. Dyn. 47, 3979–3991 (2016).

77 Andrews, T., Ringer, M. A., Doutriaux-Boucher, M., Webb, M. J. & Collins, W. J. Sensitivity of an Earth system climate model to idealized radiative forcing. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L10702 (2012).

78 Hansen, J. E., Sato, M. & Ruedy, R. Radiative forcing and climate response. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 6831–6864 (1997).

79 Modak, A., Bala, G., Cao, L. & Caldeira, K. Why must a solar forcing be larger than a CO2 forcing to cause the same global mean surface temperature change? Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 44013 (2016).

80 Rieger, V. S., Dietmüller, S. & Ponater, M. Can feedback analysis be used to uncover the physical origin of climate sensitivity and efficacy differences? Clim. Dyn. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3476-x (2016).

81 Gettelman, A., Lin, L., Medeiros, B. & Olson, J. Climate feedback variance and the interaction of aerosol forcing and feedbacks. J. Clim. 29, 6659–6675 (2016).

82 Andrews, T. & Forster, P. M. CO2 forcing induces semi-direct effects with consequences for climate feedback interpretations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L04802 (2008).

83 Gregory, J. & Webb, M. Tropospheric adjustment induces a cloud component in CO2 forcing. J. Clim. 21, 58–71 (2008).

84 Rugenstein, M. A. A., Gregory, J. M., Schaller, N., Sedláček, J. & Knutti, R. Multiannual ocean–atmosphere adjustments to radiative forcing. J. Clim. 29, 5643–5659 (2016).

85 Colman, R. A. & McAvaney, B. J. On tropospheric adjustment to forcing and climate feedbacks. Clim. Dyn. 36, 1649–1658 (2011).

86 Sherwood, S. C. et al. Adjustments in the forcing-feedback framework for understanding climate change. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 96, 217–228 (2015).

87 Hansen, J. et al. Efficacy of climate forcings. J. Geophys. Res. D 110, D18104 (2005).

88 Stuber, N., Ponater, M. & Sausen, R. Why radiative forcing might fail as a predictor of climate change. Clim. Dyn. 24, 497–510 (2005).

89 Andrews, T., Gregory, J. M., Forster, P. M. & Webb, M. J. Cloud adjustment and its role in CO2 radiative forcing and climate sensitivity: a review. Surv. Geophys. 33, 619–635 (2011).

90 Kamae, Y., Watanabe, M., Ogura, T., Yoshimori, M. & Shiogama, H. Rapid adjustments of cloud and hydrological cycle to increasing CO2: a review. Curr. Clim. Change Rep. 1, 103–113 (2015).

91 Forster, P. M. et al. Recommendations for diagnosing effective radiative forcing from climate models for CMIP6. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 121, 460–475 (2016).

92 Paynter, D. & Frölicher, T. L. Sensitivity of radiative forcing, ocean heat uptake, and climate feedback to changes in anthropogenic greenhouse gases and aerosols. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 120, 9837–9854 (2015).

93 Knutti, R., Krähenmann, S., Frame, D. J. & Allen, M. R. Comment on 'Heat capacity, time constant, and sensitivity of Earth's climate system' by S. E. Schwartz. J. Geophys. Res. 113, D15103 (2008).

94 Annan, J. D. & Hargreaves, J. C. Using multiple observationally-based constraints to estimate climate sensitivity. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L06704 (2006).

95 Hegerl, G. C., Crowley, T. J., Hyde, W. T. & Frame, D. J. Climate sensitivity constrained by temperature reconstructions over the past seven centuries. Nature 440, 1029–1032 (2006).

96 Knutti, R. & Sedláček, J. Robustness and uncertainties in the new CMIP5 climate model projections. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 369–373 (2012).

97 Urban, N. M., Holden, P. B., Edwards, N. R., Sriver, R. L. & Keller, K. Historical and future learning about climate sensitivity. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 2543–2552 (2014).

98 Myhre, G., Boucher, O., Bréon, F.-M., Forster, P. & Shindell, D. Declining uncertainty in transient climate response as CO2 forcing dominates future climate change. Nat. Geosci. 8, 181–185 (2015).

99 Fasullo, J. T., Sanderson, B. M. & Trenberth, K. E. Recent progress in constraining climate sensitivity with model ensembles. Curr. Clim. Change Rep. 1, 268–275 (2015).

100 Li, F., Rosa, D., Collins, W. D. & Wehner, M. F. 'Super-parameterization': a better way to simulate regional extreme precipitation? J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 4, M04002 (2012).

101 Schneider, T. et al. Climate goals and computing the future of clouds. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 3–5 (2017).

102 Hargreaves, J. C. & Annan, J. D. Could the Pliocene constrain the equilibrium climate sensitivity? Clim. Past 12, 1591–1599 (2016).

103 Weitzman, M. L. Fat-tailed uncertainty in the economics of catastrophic climate change. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 5, 275–292 (2011).

104 Allen, M. R. & Frame, D. J. Call off the quest. Science 318, 582–583 (2007).

105 van der Sluijs, J., van Eijndhoven, J., Shackley, S. & Wynne, B. Anchoring devices in science for policy: the case of consensus around climate sensitivity. Soc. Stud. Sci. 28, 291–323 (1998).

106 Otto, A., Todd, B. J., Bowerman, N., Frame, D. J. & Allen, M. R. Climate system properties determining the social cost of carbon. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 24032 (2013).

107 Shiogama, H. et al. Predicting future uncertainty constraints on global warming projections. Sci. Rep. 6, 18903 (2016).

108 Stott, P., Good, P., Jones, G., Gillett, N. & Hawkins, E. The upper end of climate model temperature projections is inconsistent with past warming. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 14024 (2013).

109 Gillett, N. P. Weighting climate model projections using observational constraints. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 373, 20140425 (2015).

110 Sanderson, B. M., Knutti, R. & Caldwell, P. Addressing interdependency in a multimodel ensemble by interpolation of model properties. J. Clim. 28, 5150–5170 (2015).

111 Rowlands, D. J. et al. Broad range of 2050 warming from an observationally constrained large climate model ensemble. Nat. Geosci. 5, 256–260 (2012).

112 Knutti, R. et al. A Fig of uncertainties in global temperature projections over the twenty-first century. J. Clim. 21, 2651–2663 (2008).

113 Rogelj, J., Meinshausen, M., Sedláček, J. & Knutti, R. Implications of potentially lower climate sensitivity on climate projections and policy. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 31003 (2014).

114 Knutti, R., Rogelj, J., Sedláček, J. & Fischer, E. M. A scientific critique of the two-degree climate change target. Nat. Geosci. 9, 13–18 (2016).

115 Rogelj, J. et al. Differences between carbon budget estimates unravelled. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 245–252 (2016).

116 Hawkins, E. et al. Estimating changes in global temperature since the pre-industrial period. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. http://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0007.1 (2017).

117 Schurer, A. P., Mann, M. E., Hawkins, E., Tett, S. F. B. & Hegerl, G. C. Importance of pre-industrial baseline for determining the likelihood of exceeding the Paris limits. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 563–567 (2017).

118 Rogelj, J. et al. Disentangling the effects of CO2 and short-lived climate forcer mitigation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 2–7 (2014).

119 Robiou du Pont, Y. et al. Equitable mitigation to achieve the Paris Agreement goals. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 38–43 (2016).

120 Knutti, R. & Rogelj, J. The legacy of our CO2 emissions: a clash of scientific facts, politics and ethics. Clim. Change 133, 361–373 (2015).

121 Raupach, M. R. et al. Sharing a quota on cumulative carbon emissions. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 873–879 (2014).

122 Sanderson, B. M. & Knutti, R. Delays in US mitigation could rule out Paris targets. Nat. Clim. Change (2016).

123 Rogelj, J. et al. Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C. Nature 534, 631–639 (2016).

124 Hulburt, E. O. The temperature of the lower atmosphere of the Earth. Phys. Rev. 38, 1876–1890 (1931).

125 Plass, G. N. The carbon dioxide theory of climatic change. Tellus 8, 140–154 (1956).

126 Möller, F. On the influence of changes in the CO2 concentration in air on the radiation balance of the Earth's surface and on the climate. J. Geophys. Res. 68, 3877–3886 (1963).

127 North, G. R., Cahalan, R. F. & Coakley J. A. Jr Energy balance climate models. Rev. Geophys. 19, 91–121 (1981).

128 Hansen, J. et al. Climate response times: dependence on climate sensitivity and ocean mixing. Science 229, 857 (1985).

129 Budyko, M. I. The effect of solar radiation variations on the climate of the Earth. Tellus 21, 611–619 (1969).

130 Wigley, T. M. L. & Schlesinger, M. Analytical solution for the effect of increasing CO2 on global mean temperature. Nature 315, 649–652 (1985).

131 Sellers, W. D. A global climate model based on the energy balance of the Earth–atmosphere system. J. Appl. Meteorol. 8, 392–400 (1969).

132 Wigley, T. M. L. & Raper, S. Natural variability of the climate system and detection of the greenhouse effect. Nature 344, 324–326 (1990).

133 Manabe, S. & Wetherald, R. T. The effects of doubling the CO2 concentration on the climate of a general circulation model. J. Atmos. Sci. 32, 3–15 (1975).

134 Manabe, S. & Stouffer, R. J. Sensitivity of a global climate model to an increase of CO2 concentration in the atmosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 85, 5529–5554 (1980).

135 Wetherald, R. T. & Manabe, S. Cloud cover and climate sensitivity. J. Atmos. Sci. 37, 1485–1510 (1980).

136 Hansen, J. E. et al. Climate sensitivity: analysis of feedback mechanisms. Clim. Process. Clim. Sensit. 5, 130–163 (1984).

137 Manabe, S. & Wetherald, R. T. Thermal equilibrium of the atmosphere with a given distribution of relative humidity. J. Atmos. Sci. 24, 241–259 (1967).

138 Ramanathan, V. Increased atmosheric CO2 — zonal and seasonal estimates of the effect on the radiation energy balance and surface temperature. J. Geophy. Res. 84, 4949–4958 (1979).

139 Augustsson, T. & Ramanathan, V. A radiative-convective model study of the CO2 climate problem. J. Atmos. Sci. 34, 448–451 (1977).

140 Lorius, C., Jouzel, J., Raynaud, D., Hansen, J. E. & Le Treut, H. The ice-core record: climate sensitivity and future greenhouse warming. Nature 347, 139–145 (1990).

141 Hoffert, M. I. & Covey, C. Deriving global climate sensitivity from palaeoclimate reconstructions. Nature 360, 573–575 (1992).

142 Covey, C., Sloan, L. C. & Hoffert, M. I. Paleoclimate data constraints on climate sensitivity: the paleocalibration method. Clim. Change 32, 165–184 (1996).

143 Specht, E., Redemann, T. & Lorenz, N. Simplified mathematical model for calculating global warming through anthropogenic CO2 . Int. J. Therm. Sci. 102, 1–8 (2016).

144 Harde, H. Advanced two-layer climate model for the assessment of global warming by CO2 . Open J. Atmos. Clim. Chang. 2014, 1–51 (2014).

145 Idso, S. B. CO2-induced global warming: a skeptic's view of potential climate change. Clim. Res. 10, 69–82 (1998).

146 Roe, G. H. & Armour, K. C. How sensitive is climate sensitivity? Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L14708 (2011).

147 Harde, H. Radiation transfer calculations and assessment of global warming by CO2 . Int. J. Atmos. Sci. 2017, 1–30 (2017).

148 Stouffer, R. J. Time scales of climate response. J. Clim. 17, 209–217 (2004).

149 Held, I. M. et al. Probing the fast and slow components of global warming by returning abruptly to preindustrial forcing. J. Clim. 23, 2418–2427 (2010).

150 Hansen, J., Sato, M., Kharecha, P. & von Schuckmann, K. Earth's energy imbalance and implications. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 13421–13449 (2011).

151 Rugenstein, M. A. A., Sedláček, J. & Knutti, R. Nonlinearities in patterns of long-term ocean warming. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 3380–3388 (2016).

152 Caldeira, K. & Myhrvold, N. P. Projections of the pace of warming following an abrupt increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 34039 (2013).

153 Dickinson, R. E. & Schaudt, K. J. Analysis of timescales of response of a simple climate model. J. Clim. 11, 97–106 (1998).

154 Harvey, L. D. D. & Schneider, S. H. Transient climate response to external forcing on 100–104 year time scales. Part 1: Experiments with globally averaged, coupled, atmosphere and ocean energy balance models. J. Geophys. Res. 90, 2191–2205 (1985).

155 Jarvis, A. The magnitude–timescale relationship of surface temperature feedbacks in climate models. Earth Syst. Dyn. Discuss. 2, 467–491 (2011).

156 Li, S. & Jarvis, A. Long run surface temperature dynamics of an A-OGCM: the HadCM3 4 × CO2 forcing experiment revisited. Clim. Dyn. 33, 817–825 (2009).

157 Watts, R. G., Morantine, M. C. & Achutarao, K. Timescales in energy balance climate models. 1: The limiting case solutions. J. Geophys. Res. 99, 3631–3641 (1994).

158 Morantine, M. C. & Watts, R. G. Time scales in energy balance climate models. 2: The intermediate time solutions. J. Geophys. Res. 99, 3643–3653 (1994).

159 Olivié, D. J. L., Peters, G. P. & Saint-Martin, D. Atmosphere response time scales estimated from AOGCM experiments. J. Clim. 25, 7956–7972 (2012).

160 Schneider, S. H. & Thompson, S. L. Atmospheric CO2 and climate: importance of the transient response. J. Geophys. Res. 86, 3135–3147 (1981).

161 Padilla, L. E., Vallis, G. K. & Rowley, C. W. Probabilistic estimates of transient climate sensitivity subject to uncertainty in forcing and natural variability. J. Clim. 24, 5521–5537 (2011).

162 Knutti, R. Probabilistic climate change projections for CO2 stabilization profiles. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L20707 (2005).

163 Frame, D. J., Stone, D. A., Stott, P. A. & Allen, M. R. Alternatives to stabilization scenarios. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L14707 (2006).

164 Gregory, J. M. & Forster, P. M. Transient climate response estimated from radiative forcing and observed temperature change. J. Geophys. Res. 113, D23105 (2008).

165 Armour, K. C. & Roe, G. H. Climate commitment in an uncertain world. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L01707 (2011).

166 Meehl, G. A., Washington, W. M. & Collins, W. D. How much more global warming and sea level rise? Science 307, 1769–1773 (2005).

167 Hare, B. & Meinshausen, M. How much warming are we committed to and how much can be avoided? Clim. Change 75, 111–149 (2006).

168 Harvey, L. D. D. Transient climatic response to an increase of greenhouse gases. Clim. Change 15, 15–30 (1989).

169 Allen, M. R. et al. in Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change (ed. Schellnhuber, H. J.) 281–290 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2005).

170 Plattner, G. K. et al. Long-term climate commitments projected with climate–carbon cycle models. J. Clim. 21, 2721–2751 (2008).

171 Siegenthaler, U. & Oeschger, H. Transient temperature changes due to increasing CO2 using simple models. Ann. Glaciol. 5, 153–159 (1984).

172 Bryan, K., Komro, F., Manabe, S. & Spelman, M. Transient climate response to increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide. Science 215, 56 (1982).

173 Myhre, G., Highwood, E. J., Shine, K. P. & Stordal, F. New estimates of radiative forcing due to well mixed greenhouse gases. Geophys. Res. Lett. 25, 2715–2718 (1998).

174 Chung, E.-S. & Soden, B. J. An assessment of direct radiative forcing, radiative adjustments, and radiative feedbacks in coupled ocean–atmosphere models. J. Clim. 28, 4152–4170 (2015).

175 Roe, G. H. & Baker, M. B. Comment on 'Another look at climate sensitivity' by Zaliapin and Ghil (2010). Nonlinear Process. Geophys. 18, 125–127 (2011).

176 Zaliapin, I. & Ghil, M. Another look at climate sensitivity. Nonlinear Process. Geophys. 17, 113–122 (2010).

177 Roe, G. H. & Baker, M. B. Why is climate sensitivity so unpredictable? Science 318, 629–632 (2007).

178 Hannart, A., Dufresne, J.-L. & Naveau, P. Why climate sensitivity may not be so unpredictable. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L16707 (2009).

179 Baker, M. B. & Roe, G. H. The shape of things to come: why is climate change so predictable? J. Clim. 22, 4574–4589 (2009).

180 Klein, S. A. & Hall, A. Emergent constraints for cloud feedbacks. Curr. Clim. Change Rep. 1, 276–287 (2015).

181 Knutti, R., Stocker, T. F., Joos, F. & Plattner, G.-K. Constraints on radiative forcing and future climate change from observations and climate model ensembles. Nature 416, 719–723 (2002).

182 Knutti, R., Stocker, T. F., Joos, F. & Plattner, G.-K. K. Probabilistic climate change projections using neural networks. Clim. Dyn. 21, 257–272 (2003).

183 Forest, C. E., Stone, P. H., Sokolov, A. P., Allen, M. R. & Webster, M. D. Quantifying uncertainties in climate system properties with the use of recent climate observations. Science 295, 113–117 (2002).

184 Andronova, N. G. & Schlesinger, M. E. Objective estimation of the probability density function for climate sensitivity. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 106, 22605–22611 (2001).

185 Frame, D. J. Constraining climate forecasts: the role of prior assumptions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L09702 (2005).

186 Forster, P. M. D. F. & Gregory, J. M. The climate sensitivity and its components diagnosed from Earth radiation budget data. J. Clim. 19, 39–52 (2006).

187 Forster, P. M. F. & Taylor, K. E. Climate forcings and climate sensitivities diagnosed from coupled climate model integrations. J. Clim. 19, 6181–6194 (2006).

188 Gregory, J. M., Stouffer, R. J., Raper, S. C. B., Stott, P. A. & Rayner, N. A. An observationally based estimate of the climate sensitivity. J. Clim. 15, 3117–3121 (2002).

189 Masters, T. Observational estimate of climate sensitivity from changes in the rate of ocean heat uptake and comparison to CMIP5 models. Clim. Dyn. 42, 2173–2181 (2014).

190 Aldrin, M. et al. Bayesian estimation of climate sensitivity based on a simple climate model fitted to observations of hemispheric temperatures and global ocean heat content. Environmetrics 23, 253–271 (2012).

191 Tomassini, L. et al. Robust Bayesian uncertainty analysis of climate system properties using Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods. J. Clim. 20, 1239 (2007).

192 Meinshausen, M. et al. Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 °C. Nature 458, 1158–1162 (2009).

193 Lewis, N. An objective Bayesian improved approach for applying optimal fingerprint techniques to estimate climate sensitivity. J. Clim. 26, 7414–7429 (2013).

194 Olson, R. et al. A climate sensitivity estimate using Bayesian fusion of instrumental observations and an Earth System model. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 117, D04103 (2012).

195 J. Ring, M. & E. Schlesinger, M. Bayesian learning of climate sensitivity I: Synthetic observations. Atmos. Clim. Sci. 2, 464–473 (2012).

196 Sanso, B., Forest, C. E. & Zantedeschi, D. Inferring climate system properties using a computer model. Bayesian Anal. 3, 1–37 (2008).

197 Forest, C. E., Stone, P. H. & Sokolov, A. P. Constraining climate model parameters from observed 20th century changes. Tellus A 60, 911–920 (2008).

198 Forest, C. E., Stone, P. H. & Sokolov, A. P. Estimated PDFs of climate system properties including natural and anthropogenic forcings. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L01705 (2006).

199 Sansó, B. & Forest, C. Statistical calibration of climate system properties. J. R. Stat. Soc. C 58, 485–503 (2009).

200 Tomassini, L. et al. A smoothing algorithm for estimating stochastic, continuous time model parameters and its application to a simple climate model. J. R. Stat. Soc. C 58, 679–704 (2009).

201 Libardoni, A. G. & Forest, C. E. Correction to “Sensitivity of distributions of climate system properties to the surface temperature data set”. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 2309–2311 (2013).

202 Bengtsson, L. & Schwartz, S. E. Determination of a lower bound on Earth's climate sensitivity. Tellus B 65, 21533 (2013).

203 Schwartz, S. E. Determination of Earth's transient and equilibrium climate sensitivities from observations over the twentieth century: strong dependence on assumed forcing. Surv. Geophys. 33, 745–777 (2012).

204 Schwartz, S. E., Charlson, R. J., Kahn, R. & Rodhe, H. Earth's climate sensitivity: apparent inconsistencies in recent assessments. Earth's Future 2, 601–605 (2014).

205 Storelvmo, T., Leirvik, T., Lohmann, U., Phillips, P. C. B. & Wild, M. Disentangling greenhouse warming and aerosol cooling to reveal Earth's climate sensitivity. Nat. Geosci. 9, 286–289 (2016).

206 Tanaka, K., Raddatz, T., O'Neill, B. C. & Reick, C. H. Insufficient forcing uncertainty underestimates the risk of high climate sensitivity. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L16709 (2009).

207 Tanaka, K. & Raddatz, T. Correlation between climate sensitivity and aerosol forcing and its implication for the 'climate trap'. Clim. Change 109, 815–825 (2011).

208 Urban, N. M. & Keller, K. Complementary observational constraints on climate sensitivity. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L04708 (2009).

209 Webster, M. et al. Uncertainty analysis of climate change and policy response. Clim. Change 61, 295–320 (2003).

210 Harvey, L. D. D. & Kaufmann, R. K. Simultaneously constraining climate sensitivity and aerosol radiative forcing. J. Clim. 15, 2837–2861 (2002).

211 Andreae, M. O., Jones, C. D. & Cox, P. M. Strong present-day aerosol cooling implies a hot future. Nature 435, 1187–1190 (2005).

212 Loehle, C. Global temperature trends adjusted for unforced variability. Univers. J. Geosci. 3, 183–187 (2015).

213 Lewis, N. & Grünwald, P. Objectively combining AR5 instrumental period and paleoclimate climate sensitivity evidence. Clim. Dyn. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3744-4 (2017).

214 van Hateren, J. H. A fractal climate response function can simulate global average temperature trends of the modern era and the past millennium. Clim. Dyn. 40, 2651–2670 (2013).

215 van der Werf, G. R. & Dolman, A. J. Impact of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) on deriving anthropogenic warming rates from the instrumental temperature record. Earth Syst. Dyn. 5, 375–382 (2014).

216 Rypdal, M. & Rypdal, K. Long-memory effects in linear response models of Earth's temperature and implications for future global warming. J. Clim. 27, 5240–5258 (2014).

217 Loutre, M. F. et al. Evaluating climate model performance with various parameter sets using observations over the recent past. Clim. Past 7, 511–526 (2011).

218 Rowlands, D. J. et al. Broad range of 2050 warming from an observationally constrained large climate model ensemble. Nat. Geosci. 5, 256–260 (2012).

219 Stott, P. A., Huntingford, C., Jones, C. D. & Kettleborough, J. A. Observed climate change constrains the likelihood of extreme future global warming. Tellus B 60B, 76–81 (2008).

220 Stott, P. A. & Kettleborough, J. A. Origins and estimates of uncertainty in predictions of twenty-first century temperature rise. Nature 416, 723–726 (2002).

221 Gillett, N. P., Arora, V. K., Flato, G. M., Scinocca, J. F. & von Salzen, K. Improved constraints on 21st-century warming derived using 160 years of temperature observations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L01704 (2012).

222 Stott, P. A. et al. Observational constraints on past attributable warming and predictions of future global warming. J. Clim. 19, 3055–3069 (2006).

223 Gillett, N. P., Arora, V. K., Matthews, D. & Allen, M. R. Constraining the ratio of global warming to cumulative CO2 emissions using CMIP5 simulations. J. Clim. 26, 6844–6858 (2013).

224 Lewis, N. Implications of recent multimodel attribution studies for climate sensitivity. Clim. Dyn. 46, 1387–1396 (2016).

225 Forster, P. M. Inference of climate sensitivity from analysis of Earth's energy budget. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 44, 85–106 (2016).

226 DelSole, T., Yan, X. & Tippett, M. K. Inferring aerosol cooling from hydrological sensitivity. J. Clim. 29, 6167–6178 (2016).

227 Millar, R. J. et al. Model structure in observational constraints on transient climate response. Clim. Change 131, 199–211 (2015).

228 Cowtan, K. et al. Robust comparison of climate models with observations using blended land air and ocean sea surface temperatures. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 6526–6534 (2015).

229 Huber, M. & Knutti, R. Anthropogenic and natural warming inferred from changes in Earth's energy balance. Nat. Geosci. 5, 31–36 (2012).

230 Lacis, A. A., Schmidt, G. A., Rind, D. & Ruedy, R. A. Atmospheric CO2: principal control knob governing Earth's temperature. Science 330, 356–359 (2010).

231 Murphy, D. M. et al. An observationally based energy balance for the Earth since 1950. J. Geophys. Res. 114, D012105 (2009).

232 Allan, R. P. et al. Changes in global net radiative imbalance 1985–2012. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 5588–5597 (2014).

233 Loeb, N. G. et al. Advances in understanding top-of-atmosphere radiation variability from satellite observations. Surv. Geophys. 33, 359–385 (2012).

234 Stephens, G. L. et al. An update on Earth's energy balance in light of the latest global observations. Nat. Geosci. 5, 691–696 (2012).

235 Loeb, N. G. et al. Observed changes in top-of-the-atmosphere radiation and upper-ocean heating consistent within uncertainty. Nat. Geosci. 5, 110–113 (2012).

236 Kato, S. et al. Detection of atmospheric changes in spatially and temporally averaged infrared spectra observed from space. J. Clim. 24, 6392–6407 (2011).

237 Church, J. A. et al. Revisiting the Earth's sea-level and energy budgets from 1961 to 2008. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L18601 (2011).

238 Loeb, N. G. et al. Toward optimal closure of the Earth's top-of-atmosphere radiation budget. J. Clim. 22, 748–766 (2009).

239 Smith, D. M. et al. Earth's energy imbalance since 1960 in observations and CMIP5 models. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 1205–1213 (2015).

240 Trenberth, K. E. & Fasullo, J. T. Tracking Earth's energy: from El Niño to global warming. Surv. Geophys. 33, 413–426 (2011).

241 Trenberth, K. E., Fasullo, J. T. & Balmaseda, M. A. Earth's energy imbalance. J. Clim. 27, 3129–3144 (2014).

242 Norris, J. R. et al. Evidence for climate change in the satellite cloud record. Nature 536, 72–75 (2016).

243 He, J., Winton, M., Vecchi, G., Jia, L. & Rugenstein, M. Transient climate sensitivity depends on base climate ocean circulation. J. Clim. 30, 1493–1504 (2017).

244 Liang, M.-C., Lin, L.-C., Tung, K.-K., Yung, Y. L. & Sun, S. Transient climate response in coupled atmospheric–ocean general circulation models. J. Atmos. Sci. 70, 1291–1296 (2013).

245 Trossman, D. S., Palter, J. B., Merlis, T. M., Huang, Y. & Xia, Y. Large-scale ocean circulation–cloud interactions reduce the pace of transient climate change. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 3935–3943 (2016).

246 Allen, M. R., Forest, C. E., Stone, P. H. & Sokolov, A. P. Constraining uncertainties in climate models using climate change detection techniques. Geophys. Res. Lett. 27, 569–572 (2000).

247 Stott, P. A., Kettleborough, J. A. & Allen, M. R. Uncertainty in continental-scale temperature predictions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L02708 (2006).

248 Rogelj, J., Meinshausen, M. & Knutti, R. Global warming under old and new scenarios using IPCC climate sensitivity range estimates. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 248–253 (2012).

249 Sokolov, A. P. et al. Probabilistic forecast for twenty-first-century climate based on uncertainties in emissions (without policy) and climate parameters. J. Clim. 22, 5175–5204 (2009).

250 Sokolov, A. P., Forest, C. E. & Stone, P. H. Sensitivity of climate change projections to uncertainties in the estimates of observed changes in deep-ocean heat content. Clim. Dyn. 34, 735–745 (2010).

251 Jones, G. S., Stott, P. A. & Mitchell, J. F. B. Uncertainties in the attribution of greenhouse gas warming and implications for climate prediction. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 121, 6969–6992 (2016).

252 Kaufmann, R. K. & Stern, D. I. Cointegration analysis of hemispheric temperature relations. J. Geophys. Res. 107, D000174 (2002).

253 Lovejoy, S. Scaling fluctuation analysis and statistical hypothesis testing of anthropogenic warming. Clim. Dyn. 42, 2339–2351 (2014).

254 Lovejoy, S. & Schertzer, D. Stochastic and scaling climate sensitivities: solar, volcanic and orbital forcings. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L11702 (2012).

255 Stern, D. I. An atmosphere–ocean time series model of global climate change. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 51, 1330–1346 (2006).

256 Bell, T. L. Climate sensitivity from fluctuation dissipation — some simple model tests. J. Atmos. Sci. 37, 1700–1707 (1980).

257 Ragone, F., Lucarini, V. & Lunkeit, F. A new framework for climate sensitivity and prediction: a modelling perspective. Clim. Dyn. 46, 1459–1471 (2016).

258 Cooper, F. C. & Haynes, P. H. Climate sensitivity via a nonparametric fluctuation–dissipation theorem. J. Atmos. Sci. 68, 937–953 (2011).

259 Kirk-Davidoff, D. B. On the diagnosis of climate sensitivity using observations of fluctuations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9, 813–822 (2009).

260 Majda, A. J., Gershgorin, B. & Yuan, Y. Low-frequency climate response and fluctuation–dissipation theorems: theory and practice. J. Atmos. Sci. 67, 1186–1201 (2010).

261 Abramov, R. V. & Majda, A. J. A new algorithm for low-frequency climate response. J. Atmos. Sci. 66, 286–309 (2009).

262 Leith, C. E. Climate response and fluctuation dissipation. J. Atmos. Sci. 32, 2022–2026 (1975).

263 Thuburn, J. Climate sensitivities via a Fokker–Planck adjoint approach. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 131, 73–92 (2005).

264 Lucarini, V., Ragone, F. & Lunkeit, F. Predicting climate change using response theory: global averages and spatial patterns. J. Stat. Phys. 166, 1036–1064 (2017).

265 Zhou, C., Zelinka, M. D., Dessler, A. E. & Klein, S. A. The relationship between interannual and long-term cloud feedbacks. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 10463–10469 (2015).

266 Dessler, A. E., Zhang, Z. & Yang, P. Water-vapor climate feedback inferred from climate fluctuations, 2003–2008. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L20704 (2008).

267 Dessler, A. E. Observations of climate feedbacks over 2000–10 and comparisons to climate models. J. Clim. 26, 333–342 (2013).

268 Tsushima, Y. & Manabe, S. Assessment of radiative feedback in climate models using satellite observations of annual flux variation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 7568–7573 (2013).

269 Xie, S.-P., Kosaka, Y. & Okumura, Y. M. Distinct energy budgets for anthropogenic and natural changes during global warming hiatus. Nat. Geosci. 9, 29–33 (2016).

270 Brown, P. T., Li, W., Jiang, J. H. & Su, H. Unforced surface air temperature variability and its contrasting relationship with the anomalous TOA energy flux at local and global spatial scales. J. Clim. 29, 925–940 (2016).

271 Lin, B. et al. Estimations of climate sensitivity based on top-of-atmosphere radiation imbalance. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 1923–1930 (2010).

272 Lin, B., Min, Q., Sun, W., Hu, Y. & Fan, T.-F. Can climate sensitivity be estimated from short-term relationships of top-of-atmosphere net radiation and surface temperature? J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 112, 177–181 (2011).

273 Trenberth, K. E., Zhang, Y., Fasullo, J. T. & Taguchi, S. Climate variability and relationships between top-of-atmosphere radiation and temperatures on Earth. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 120, 3642–3659 (2015).

274 Masters, T. On the determination of the global cloud feedback from satellite measurements. Earth Syst. Dyn. 3, 97–107 (2012).

275 Trenberth, K. E., Fasullo, J. T. & Abraham, J. P. Issues in establishing climate sensitivity in recent studies. Remote Sens. 3, 2051–2056 (2011).

276 Lyman, J. M. Estimating global energy flow from the global upper ocean. Surv. Geophys. 33, 387–393 (2011).

277 Abraham, J. Issues related to the use of one-dimensional ocean-diffusion models for determining climate sensitivity. J. Earth Sci. Clim. Change 5, (2014).

278 Murphy, D. M. & Forster, P. M. On the accuracy of deriving climate feedback parameters from correlations between surface temperature and outgoing radiation. J. Clim. 23, 4983–4988 (2010).

279 Richardson, M., Hausfather, Z., Nuccitelli, D. A., Rice, K. & Abraham, J. P. Misdiagnosis of Earth climate sensitivity based on energy balance model results. Sci. Bull. 60, 1370–1377 (2015).

280 Lindzen, R. S. & Choi, Y.-S. On the determination of climate feedbacks from ERBE data. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L16705 (2009).

281 Lindzen, R. S. & Choi, Y.-S. On the observational determination of climate sensitivity and its implications. Asia-Pacific J. Atmos. Sci. 47, 377–390 (2011).

282 Spencer, R. W. & Braswell, W. D. Potential biases in feedback diagnosis from observational data: a simple model demonstration. J. Clim. 21, 5624–5628 (2008).

283 Spencer, R. W. & Braswell, W. D. On the diagnosis of radiative feedback in the presence of unknown radiative forcing. J. Geophys. Res. 115, D16109 (2010).

284 Spencer, R. W. & Braswell, W. D. On the nisdiagnosis of surface temperature feedbacks from variations in Earth's radiant energy balance. Remote Sens. 3, 1603–1613 (2011).

285 Choi, Y.-S. et al. Influence of non-feedback variations of radiation on the determination of climate feedback. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 115, 355–364 (2014).

286 Koumoutsaris, S. What can we learn about climate feedbacks from short-term climate variations? Tellus A 65, 1–17 (2013).

287 Bodman, R. W. & Jones, R. N. Bayesian estimation of climate sensitivity using observationally constrained simple climate models. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 7, 461–473 (2016).

288 Chung, E.-S., Soden, B. J. & Sohn, B.-J. Revisiting the determination of climate sensitivity from relationships between surface temperature and radiative fluxes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L10703 (2010).

289 Murphy, D. M. Constraining climate sensitivity with linear fits to outgoing radiation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L09704 (2010).

290 Monckton, C., Soon, W. W.-H., Legates, D. R. & Briggs, W. M. Why models run hot: results from an irreducibly simple climate model. Sci. Bull. 60, 122–135 (2015).

291 Bates, J. R. Estimating climate sensitivity using two-zone energy balance models. Earth Space Sci. 3, 207–225 (2016).

292 Bates, J. R. Climate stability and sensitivity in some simple conceptual models. Clim. Dyn. 38, 455–473 (2012).

293 Schwartz, S. E. Reply to comments by G. Foster. et al., R. Knutti. et al., and N. Scafetta on 'Heat capacity, time constant, and sensitivity of Earth's climate system'. J. Geophys. Res. 113, D15105 (2008).

294 Schwartz, S. E. Heat capacity, time constant, and sensitivity of Earth's climate system. J. Geophys. Res. 112, D24S05 (2007).

295 Foster, G., Annan, J. D., Schmidt, G. A. & Mann, M. E. Comment on 'Heat capacity, time constant, and sensitivity of Earth's climate system' by S. E. Schwartz. J. Geophys. Res. 113, D15102 (2008).

296 Schwartz, S. E. Uncertainty in climate sensitivity: causes, consequences, challenges. Energy Environ. Sci. 1, 430–453 (2008).

297 Chylek, P. et al. Limits on climate sensitivity derived from recent satellite and surface observations. J. Geophys. Res. 112, D24S04 (2007).

298 Trenberth, K. E., Fasullo, J. T., O'Dell, C. & Wong, T. Relationships between tropical sea surface temperature and top-of-atmosphere radiation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L03702 (2010).

299 Loehle, C. A minimal model for estimating climate sensitivity. Ecol. Modell. 276, 80–84 (2014).

300 Cawley, G. C., Cowtan, K., Way, R. G., Jacobs, P. & Jokimäki, A. On a minimal model for estimating climate sensitivity. Ecol. Modell. 297, 20–25 (2015).

301 Ollila, A. The potency of carbon dioxide (CO2) as a greenhouse gas. Dev. Earth Sci. 2, (2014).

302 Soden, B. J. Global cooling after the eruption of Mount Pinatubo: a test of climate feedback by water vapor. Science 296, 727–730 (2002).

303 Bender, F. A.-M., Ekman, A. M. L. & Rodhe, H. Response to the eruption of Mount Pinatubo in relation to climate sensitivity in the CMIP3 models. Clim. Dyn. 35, 875–886 (2010).

304 Merlis, T. M., Held, I. M., Stenchikov, G. L., Zeng, F. & Horowitz, L. W. Constraining transient climate sensitivity using coupled climate model simulations of volcanic eruptions. J. Clim. 27, 7781–7795 (2014).

305 Wigley, T. M. L. Effect of climate sensitivity on the response to volcanic forcing. J. Geophys. Res. 110, D09107 (2005).

306 Boer, G. J., Stowasser, M. & Hamilton, K. Inferring climate sensitivity from volcanic events. Clim. Dyn. 28, 481–502 (2007).

307 Yokohata, T. et al. Climate response to volcanic forcing: Validation of climate sensitivity of a coupled atmosphere–ocean general circulation model. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L21710 (2005).

308 Santer, B. et al. Volcanic effects on climate. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 3–4 (2015).

309 Ollila, A. Climate sensitivity parameter in the test of the Mount Pinatubo eruption. Phys. Sci. Int. J. 9, 1–14 (2016).

310 Lehner, F., Schurer, A. P., Hegerl, G. C., Deser, C. & Frölicher, T. L. The importance of ENSO phase during volcanic eruptions for detection and attribution. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 2851–2858 (2016).

311 Douglass, D. H., Knox, R. S., Pearson, B. D. & Clark, A. Thermocline flux exchange during the Pinatubo event. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L19711 (2006).

312 Tung, K. K., Zhou, J. & Camp, C. D. Constraining model transient climate response using independent observations of solar-cycle forcing and response. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L17707 (2008).

313 Raper, S. C. B., Gregory, J. M. & Stouffer, R. J. The role of climate sensitivity and ocean heat uptake on AOGCM transient temperature response. J. Clim. 15, 124–130 (2002).

314 Räisänen, J. Probability distributions of CO2-induced global warming as inferred directly from multimodel ensemble simulations. Geophysica 41, 19–30 (2005).

315 Forster, P. M. et al. Evaluating adjusted forcing and model spread for historical and future scenarios in the CMIP5 generation of climate models. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 118, 1139–1150 (2013).

316 Knutti, R. Why are climate models reproducing the observed global surface warming so well? Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L18704 (2008).

317 Kiehl, J. T. Twentieth century climate model response and climate sensitivity. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L22710 (2007).

318 Bony, S. et al. How well do we understand and evaluate climate change feedback processes? J. Clim. 19, 3445–3482 (2006).

319 Soden, B. J. & Held, I. M. An assessment of climate feedbacks in coupled ocean–atmosphere models. J. Clim. 19, 3354–3360 (2006).

320 Huybers, P. Compensation between model feedbacks and curtailment of climate sensitivity. J. Clim. 23, 3009–3018 (2010).

321 Whetton, P., Macadam, I., Bathols, J. & O'Grady, J. Assessment of the use of current climate patterns to evaluate regional enhanced greenhouse response patterns of climate models. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L14701 (2007).

322 Scherrer, S. C. Present-day interannual variability of surface climate in CMIP3 models and its relation to future warming. Int. J. Climatol. 31, 1518–1529 (2011).

323 Knutti, R., Furrer, R., Tebaldi, C., Cermak, J. & Meehl, G. A. Challenges in combining projections from multiple climate models. J. Clim. 23, 2739–2758 (2010).

324 Masson, D. & Knutti, R. Predictor screening, calibration, and observational constraints in climate model ensembles: an illustration using climate sensitivity. J. Clim. 26, 887–898 (2013).

325 Sanderson, B. M. On the estimation of systematic error in regression-based predictions of climate sensitivity. Clim. Change 118, 757–770 (2013).

326 Knutti, R., Meehl, G. A., Allen, M. R. & Stainforth, D. A. Constraining climate sensitivity from the seasonal cycle in surface temperature. J. Clim. 19, 4224–4233 (2006).

327 Reichler, T. & Kim, J. How well do coupled models simulate today's climate? Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 89, 303 (2008).

328 Knutti, R., Masson, D. & Gettelman, A. Climate model genealogy: generation CMIP5 and how we got there. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 1194–1199 (2013).

329 Sanderson, B. M. & Knutti, R. On the interpretation of constrained climate model ensembles. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L16708 (2012).

330 Hall, A. & Qu, X. Using the current seasonal cycle to constrain snow albedo feedback in future climate change. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L03502 (2006).

331 Boé, J., Hall, A. & Qu, X. September sea-ice cover in the Arctic Ocean projected to vanish by 2100. Nat. Geosci. 2, 341–343 (2009).

332 Mahlstein, I. & Knutti, R. September Arctic sea ice predicted to disappear near 2 °C global warming above present. J. Geophys. Res. 117, D06104 (2012).

333 Sanderson, B. M. et al. Constraints on model response to greenhouse gas forcing and the role of subgrid-scale processes. J. Clim. 21, 2384–2400 (2008).

334 Sanderson, B. M., Piani, C., Ingram, W. J., Stone, D. A. & Allen, M. R. Towards constraining climate sensitivity by linear analysis of feedback patterns in thousands of perturbed-physics GCM simulations. Clim. Dyn. 30, 175–190 (2008).

335 Piani, C., Frame, D. J., Stainforth, D. A. & Allen, M. R. Constraints on climate change from a multi-thousand member ensemble of simulations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L23825 (2005).

336 Stainforth, D. A. et al. Uncertainty in predictions of the climate response to rising levels of greenhouse gases. Nature 433, 403–406 (2005).

337 Huber, M., Mahlstein, I., Wild, M., Fasullo, J. & Knutti, R. Constraints on climate sensitivity from radiation patterns in climate models. J. Clim. 24, 1034–1052 (2011).

338 Klocke, D., Pincus, R. & Quaas, J. On constraining estimates of climate sensitivity with present-day observations through model weighting. J. Clim. 24, 6092–6099 (2011).

339 Fasullo, J. T. & Trenberth, K. E. A less cloudy future: the role of subtropical subsidence in climate sensitivity. Science 338, 792–794 (2012).

340 Shukla, J., DelSole, T., Fennessy, M., Kinter, J. & Paolino, D. Climate model fidelity and projections of climate change. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L07702 (2006).

341 Tett, S. F. B., Rowlands, D. J., Mineter, M. J. & Cartis, C. Can top-of-atmosphere radiation measurements constrain climate predictions? Part II: Climate sensitivity. J. Clim. 26, 9367–9383 (2013).

342 Tett, S. F. B., Mineter, M. J., Cartis, C., Rowlands, D. J. & Liu, P. Can top-of-atmosphere radiation measurements constrain climate predictions? Part I: Tuning. J. Clim. 26, 9348–9366 (2013).

343 Sherwood, S. C., Bony, S. & Dufresne, J.-L. Spread in model climate sensitivity traced to atmospheric convective mixing. Nature 505, 37–42 (2014).

344 Zhai, C., Jiang, J. H. & Su, H. Long-term cloud change imprinted in seasonal cloud variation: more evidence of high climate sensitivity. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 8729–8737 (2015).

345 Tian, B. Spread of model climate sensitivity linked to double-Intertropical Convergence Zone bias. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 4133–4141 (2015).

346 Tan, I., Storelvmo, T. & Zelinka, M. D. Observational constraints on mixed-phase clouds imply higher climate sensitivity. Science 352, 224–227 (2016).

347 Brient, F. & Schneider, T. Constraints on climate sensitivity from space-based measurements of low-cloud reflection. J. Clim. 29, 5821–5835 (2016).

348 Kamae, Y., Ogura, T., Shiogama, H. & Watanabe, M. Recent progress toward reducing the uncertainty in tropical low cloud feedback and climate sensitivity: a review. Geosci. Lett. 3, 1–10 (2016).

349 Volodin, E. M. Relation between temperature sensitivity to doubled carbon dioxide and the distribution of clouds in current climate models. Izv. Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 44, 288–299 (2008).

350 Trenberth, K. E. & Fasullo, J. T. Simulation of present-day and twenty-first-century energy budgets of the Southern Oceans. J. Clim. 23, 440–454 (2010).

351 Su, H. et al. Weakening and strengthening structures in the Hadley Circulation change under global warming and implications for cloud response and climate sensitivity. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 119, 5787–5805 (2014).

352 Levis, S., Bonan, G. B. & Lawrence, P. J. Present-day springtime high-latitude surface albedo as a predictor of simulated climate sensitivity. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L17703 (2007).

353 Tsushima, Y., Abe-Ouchi, A. & Manabe, S. Radiative damping of annual variation in global mean surface temperature: comparison between observed and simulated feedback. Clim. Dyn. 24, 591–597 (2005).

354 Wu, Q. Statistics of calendar month averages of surface temperature: a possible relationship to climate sensitivity. J. Geophys. Res. 108, D002218 (2003).

355 Sexton, D. M. H. & Murphy, J. M. Multivariate probabilistic projections using imperfect climate models. Part II: Robustness of methodological choices and consequences for climate sensitivity. Clim. Dyn. 38, 2543–2558 (2012).

356 Siler, N., Po-Chedley, S. & Bretherton, C. S. Variability in modeled cloud feedback tied to differences in the climatological spatial pattern of clouds. Clim. Dyn. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3673-2 (2017).

357 Gordon, N. D. & Klein, S. A. Low-cloud optical depth feedback in climate models. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 119, 6052–6065 (2014).

358 Gettelman, A. & Sherwood, S. C. Processes responsible for cloud feedback. Curr. Clim. Change Rep. 2, 179–189 (2016).

359 Bretherton, C. S. Insights into low-latitude cloud feedbacks from high-resolution models. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 373, 20140415 (2015).

360 Clement, A. C., Burgman, R. & Norris, J. R. Observational and model evidence for positive low-level cloud feedback. Science 325, 460–464 (2009).

361 Lemoine, D. M. Climate sensitivity distributions dependence on the possibility that models share biases. J. Clim. 23, 4395–4415 (2010).

362 Hourdin, F. et al. The art and science of climate model tuning. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 98, 589–602 (2017).

363 Schmidt, G. A. et al. Practice and philosophy of climate model tuning across six U. S. modeling centers. Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2017-30 (2017).

364 Grise, K. M., Polvani, L. M. & Fasullo, J. T. Reexamining the relationship between climate sensitivity and the Southern Hemisphere radiation budget in CMIP models. J. Clim. 28, 9298–9312 (2015).

365 Caldwell, P. M. et al. Statistical significance of climate sensitivity predictors obtained by data mining. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 1803–1808 (2014).

366 Sanderson, B. M. A multimodel study of parametric uncertainty in predictions of climate response to rising greenhouse gas concentrations. J. Clim. 24, 1362–1377 (2011).

367 Sanderson, B. M., Shell, K. M. & Ingram, W. Climate feedbacks determined using radiative kernels in a multi-thousand member ensemble of AOGCMs. Clim. Dyn. 35, 1219–1236 (2009).

368 Rodwell, M. J. & Palmer, T. Using numerical weather prediction to assess climate models. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 133, 129–146 (2007).

369 Zhao, M. et al. Uncertainty in model climate sensitivity traced to representations of cumulus precipitation microphysics. J. Clim. 29, 543–560 (2016).

370 Dufresne, J.-L. & Bony, S. An assessment of the primary sources of spread of global warming estimates from coupled atmosphere–ocean models. J. Clim. 21, 5135 (2008).

371 Soden, B. J. et al. Quantifying climate feedbacks using radiative kernels. J. Clim. 21, 3504–3520 (2008).

372 Medeiros, B. et al. Aquaplanets, climate sensitivity, and low clouds. J. Clim. 21, 4974–4991 (2008).

373 Bony, S. et al. Thermodynamic control of anvil cloud amount. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA 113, 8927–8932 (2016).

374 Qu, X., Hall, A., Klein, S. A. & Caldwell, P. M. On the spread of changes in marine low cloud cover in climate model simulations of the 21st century. Clim. Dyn. 42, 2603–2626 (2014).

375 Webb, M. J., Lambert, F. H. & Gregory, J. M. Origins of differences in climate sensitivity, forcing and feedback in climate models. Clim. Dyn. 40, 677–707 (2013).

376 Tomassini, L., Voigt, A. & Stevens, B. On the connection between tropical circulation, convective mixing, and climate sensitivity. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 141, 1404–1416 (2015).

377 Vial, J., Dufresne, J.-L. & Bony, S. On the interpretation of inter-model spread in CMIP5 climate sensitivity estimates. Clim. Dyn. 41, 3339–3362 (2013).

378 Bony, S. Marine boundary layer clouds at the heart of tropical cloud feedback uncertainties in climate models. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L20806 (2005).

379 Bony, S. et al. Clouds, circulation and climate sensitivity. Nat. Geosci. 8, 261–268 (2015).

380 Parker, W. S. Understanding pluralism in climate modeling. Found. Sci. 11, 349–368 (2006).

381 Pincus, R., Batstone, C. P., Hofmann, R. J. P., Taylor, K. E. & Glecker, P. J. Evaluating the present-day simulation of clouds, precipitation, and radiation in climate models. J. Geophys. Res. 113, D14209 (2008).

382 Gleckler, P. J., Taylor, K. E. & Doutriaux, C. Performance metrics for climate models. J. Geophys. Res. 113, D06104 (2008).

383 Knutti, R. et al. Good Practice Guidance Paper on Assessing and Combining Multi Model Climate Projections (IPCC, 2010).

384 Pierce, D. W., Barnett, T. P., Santer, B. D. & Gleckler, P. J. Selecting global climate models for regional climate change studies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 8441–8446 (2009).

385 Eyring, V. et al. A strategy for process-oriented validation of coupled chemistry–climate models. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 86, 1117–1133 (2005).

386 Wenzel, S., Eyring, V., Gerber, E. P. & Karpechko, A. Y. Constraining future summer austral jet stream positions in the CMIP5 Ensemble by process-oriented multiple diagnostic regression. J. Clim. 29, 673–687 (2016).

387 Borodina, A., Fischer, E. M. & Knutti, R. Emergent constraints in climate projections: a case study of changes in high-latitude temperature variability. J. Clim. 30, 3655–3670 (2017).

388 Sanderson, B. M., Knutti, R. & Caldwell, P. A representative democracy to reduce interdependency in a multimodel ensemble. J. Clim. 28, 5171–5194 (2015).

389 Knutti, R. et al. A climate model projection weighting scheme accounting for performance and interdependence. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 1909–1918 (2017).

390 Sanderson, B. M., Wehner, M. & Knutti, R. Skill and independence weighting for multi-model assessments. Geosci. Model Dev. 10, 2379–2395 (2017).

391 Masson, D. & Knutti, R. Climate model genealogy. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L08703 (2011).

392 Jun, M., Knutti, R. & Nychka, D. W. Local eigenvalue analysis of CMIP3 climate model errors. Tellus A 60, 992–1000 (2008).

393 Annan, J. D. & Hargreaves, J. C. Understanding the CMIP3 multimodel ensemble. J. Clim. 24, 4529–4538 (2011).

394 Bishop, C. H. & Abramowitz, G. Climate model dependence and the replicate Earth paradigm. Clim. Dyn. 41, 885–900 (2012).

395 Abramowitz, G. & Bishop, C. H. Climate model dependence and the ensemble dependence transformation of CMIP projections. J. Clim. 28, 2332–2348 (2015).

396 Abramowitz, G. & Gupta, H. Toward a model space and model independence metric. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L032834 (2008).

397 DelSole, T. & Shukla, J. Artificial skill due to predictor screening. J. Clim. 22, 331–345 (2009).

398 Räisänen, J., Ruokolainen, L. & Ylhäisi, J. Weighting of model results for improving best estimates of climate change. Clim. Dyn. 35, 407–422 (2009).

399 Weigel, A. P., Knutti, R., Liniger, M. A. & Appenzeller, C. Risks of model weighting in multimodel climate projections. J. Clim. 23, 4175–4191 (2010).

400 Edwards, T. L., Crucifix, M. & Harrison, S. P. Using the past to constrain the future: how the palaeorecord can improve estimates of global warming. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 31, 481–500 (2007).

401 Harrison, S. P. et al. Evaluation of CMIP5 palaeo-simulations to improve climate projections. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 735–743 (2015).

402 Braconnot, P. et al. Evaluation of climate models using palaeoclimatic data. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 417–424 (2012).

403 Schmidt, G. A. et al. Using palaeo-climate comparisons to constrain future projections in CMIP5. Clim. Past 10, 221–250 (2014).

404 Dowsett, H. J. et al. Assessing confidence in Pliocene sea surface temperatures to evaluate predictive models. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 365–371 (2012).

405 Lunt, D. J. et al. Warm climates of the past — a lesson for the future? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 371, 20130146 (2013).

406 Schneider von Deimling, T., Held, H., Ganopolski, A. & Rahmstorf, S. Climate sensitivity estimated from ensemble simulations of glacial climate. Clim. Dyn. 27, 149–163 (2006).

407 Hargreaves, J. C., Abe-Ouchi, A. & Annan, J. D. Linking glacial and future climates through an ensemble of GCM simulations. Clim. Past 3, 77–87 (2007).

408 Hargreaves, J. C., Annan, J. D., Yoshimori, M. & Abe-Ouchi, A. Can the Last Glacial Maximum constrain climate sensitivity? Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L24702 (2012).

409 Hopcroft, P. O. & Valdes, P. J. How well do simulated last glacial maximum tropical temperatures constrain equilibrium climate sensitivity? Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 5533–5539 (2015).

410 Schmittner, A. et al. Climate sensitivity estimated from temperature reconstructions of the Last Glacial Maximum. Science 334, 1385–1388 (2011).

411 Annan, J. D., Hargreaves, J. C., Ohgaito, R., Abe-Ouchi, A. & Emori, S. Efficiently constraining climate sensitivity with ensembles of paleoclimate simulations. SOLA 1, 181–184 (2005).

412 Annan, J. D. & Hargreaves, J. C. A perspective on model-data surface temperature comparison at the Last Glacial Maximum. Quat. Sci. Rev. 107, 1–10 (2015).

413 Köhler, P. et al. What caused Earth's temperature variations during the last 800,000 years? Data-based evidence on radiative forcing and constraints on climate sensitivity. Quat. Sci. Rev. 29, 129–145 (2010).

414 Friedrich, T., Timmermann, A., Tigchelaar, M., Elison Timm, O. & Ganopolski, A. Nonlinear climate sensitivity and its implications for future greenhouse warming. Sci. Adv. 2, e1501923 (2016).

415 Came, R. E. et al. Coupling of surface temperatures and atmospheric CO2 concentrations during the Palaeozoic era. Nature 449, 198–201 (2007).

416 Crucifix, M. Does the Last Glacial Maximum constrain climate sensitivity? Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L18701 (2006).

417 Holden, P. B., Edwards, N. R., Oliver, K. I. C., Lenton, T. M. & Wilkinson, R. D. A probabilistic calibration of climate sensitivity and terrestrial carbon change in GENIE-1. Clim. Dyn. 35, 785–806 (2010).

418 Lea, D. W. The 100 000-yr cycle in tropical SST, greenhouse gorcing, and climate sensitivity. J. Clim. 17, 2170–2179 (2004).

419 Manabe, S. & Broccoli, A. A comparison of climate model sensitivity with data from the last glacial maximum. J. Atmos. Sci. 42, 2643–2651 (1985).

420 Skinner, L. A long view on climate sensitivity. Science 337, 917–919 (2012).

421 Chylek, P. & Lohmann, U. Aerosol radiative forcing and climate sensitivity deduced from the Last Glacial Maximum to Holocene transition. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L04804 (2008).

422 Hargreaves, J. C. & Annan, J. D. Comment on 'Aerosol radiative forcing and climate sensitivity deduced from the Last Glacial Maximum to Holocene transition' by P. Chylek and U. Lohmann. Clim. Past 5, 143–145 (2009).

423 Ganopolski, A. & Schneider von Deimling, T. Comment on 'Aerosol radiative forcing and climate sensitivity deduced from the Last Glacial Maximum to Holocene transition' by Petr Chylek and Ulrike Lohmann. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L23703 (2008).

424 Chylek, P. & Lohmann, U. Reply to comment by Andrey Ganopolski and Thomas Schneider von Deimling on 'Aerosol radiative forcing and climate sensitivity deduced from the Last Glacial Maximum to Holocene transition'. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L23704 (2008).

425 Dunkley Jones, T. et al. A Palaeogene perspective on climate sensitivity and methane hydrate instability. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 368, 2395–2415 (2010).

426 Rohling, E. J., Medina-Elizalde, M., Shepherd, J. G., Siddall, M. & Stanford, J. D. Sea surface and high-latitude temperature sensitivity to radiative forcing of climate over several glacial cycles. J. Clim. 25, 1635–1656 (2012).

427 Shaffer, G., Huber, M., Rondanelli, R. & Pepke Pedersen, J. O. Deep time evidence for climate sensitivity increase with warming. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 6538–6545 (2016).

428 Kutzbach, J. E., He, F., Vavrus, S. J. & Ruddiman, W. F. The dependence of equilibrium climate sensitivity on climate state: applications to studies of climates colder than present. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 3721–3726 (2013).

429 Köhler, P., de Boer, B., von der Heydt, A. S., Stap, L. B. & van de Wal, R. S. W. On the state dependency of the equilibrium climate sensitivity during the last 5 million years. Clim. Past 11, 1801–1823 (2015).

430 Royer, D. L., Pagani, M. & Beerling, D. J. Geobiological constraints on Earth system sensitivity to CO2 during the Cretaceous and Cenozoic. Geobiology 10, 298–310 (2012).

431 Caballero, R. & Huber, M. State-dependent climate sensitivity in past warm climates and its implications for future climate projections. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 14162–14167 (2013).

432 Royer, D. L., Berner, R. A. & Park, J. Climate sensitivity constrained by CO2 concentrations over the past 420 million years. Nature 446, 530–532 (2007).

433 Anagnostou, E. et al. Changing atmospheric CO2 concentration was the primary driver of early Cenozoic climate. Nature 533, 380–384 (2016).

434 Martínez-Botí, M. a. et al. Plio–Pleistocene climate sensitivity evaluated using high-resolution CO2 records. Nature 518, 49–54 (2015).

435 Goelzer, H. et al. Impact of Greenland and Antarctic ice sheet interactions on climate sensitivity. Clim. Dyn. 37, 1005–1018 (2011).

436 Swingedouw, D. et al. Antarctic ice-sheet melting provides negative feedbacks on future climate warming. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L17705 (2008).

437 Lunt, D. J. et al. Earth system sensitivity inferred from Pliocene modelling and data. Nat. Geosci. 3, 60–64 (2010).

438 Pagani, M., Liu, Z., LaRiviere, J. & Ravelo, A. C. High Earth-system climate sensitivity determined from Pliocene carbon dioxide concentrations. Nat. Geosci. 3, 27–30 (2010).

439 Hansen, J., Sato, M., Russell, G. & Kharecha, P. Climate sensitivity, sea level and atmospheric carbon dioxide. Philos. Trans. A 371, 20120294 (2013).

440 Zeebe, R. E. Time-dependent climate sensitivity and the legacy of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 13739–13744 (2013).

441 Kiehl, J. Lessons from Earth' s past. Science 331, 158–159 (2011).

442 Previdi, M. et al. Climate sensitivity in the Anthropocene. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 139, 1121–1131 (2013).

443 Dyez, K. A. & Ravelo, A. C. Late Pleistocene tropical Pacific temperature sensitivity to radiative greenhouse gas forcing. Geology 41, 23–26 (2013).

444 Hansen, J. et al. Target atmospheric CO2: where should humanity aim? Open Atmos. Sci. J. 2, 217–231 (2008).

445 Park, J. & Royer, D. L. Geologic constraints on the glacial amplification of Phanerozoic climate sensitivity. Am. J. Sci. 311, 1–26 (2011).

446 von der Heydt, A. S. et al. Lessons on climate sensitivity from past climate changes. Curr. Clim. Chang. Rep. 2, 148–158 (2016).

447 Morgan, M. G. & Keith, D. W. Subjective judgements by climate experts. Environ. Sci. Technol. 29, 468–476 (1995).

448 Zickfeld, K., Morgan, M. G., Frame, D. J. & Keith, D. W. Expert judgments about transient climate response to alternative future trajectories of radiative forcing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 12451–12456 (2010).

449 Millner, A., Calel, R., Stainforth, D. A. & MacKerron, G. Do probabilistic expert elicitations capture scientists' uncertainty about climate change? Clim. Change 116, 427–436 (2013).

450 Oppenheimer, M., Little, C. M. & Cooke, R. M. Expert judgement and uncertainty quantification for climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 445–451 (2016).

451 Raupach, M. R. The exponential eigenmodes of the carbon-climate system, and their implications for ratios of responses to forcings. Earth Syst. Dyn. 4, 31–49 (2013).

452 Raupach, M. R. et al. The relationship between peak warming and cumulative CO2 emissions, and its use to quantify vulnerabilities in the carbon–climate–human system. Tellus B 63, 145–164 (2011).

453 Friedlingstein, P. et al. Persistent growth of CO2 emissions and implications for reaching climate targets. Nat. Geosci. 7, 709–715 (2014).

454 MacDougall, A. H. The transient response to cumulative CO2 emissions: a review. Curr. Clim. Change Rep. 2, 39–47 (2016).

455 Zickfeld, K., MacDougall, A. H. & Matthews, H. D. On the proportionality between global temperature change and cumulative CO2 emissions during periods of net negative CO2 emissions. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 55006 (2016).

456 Matthews, H. D., Gillett, N. P., Stott, P. A. & Zickfeld, K. The proportionality of global warming to cumulative carbon emissions. Nature 459, 829–832 (2009).

457 Zickfeld, K., Eby, M., Matthews, H. D. & Weaver, A. J. Setting cumulative emissions targets to reduce the risk of dangerous climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 16129–16134 (2009).

458 Allen, M. R. et al. Warming caused by cumulative carbon emissions towards the trillionth tonne. Nature 458, 1163–1166 (2009).

459 Gregory, J. M., Jones, C. D., Cadule, P. & Friedlingstein, P. Quantifying carbon cycle feedbacks. J. Clim. 22, 5232–5250 (2009).

460 Steinacher, M., Joos, F. & Stocker, T. F. Allowable carbon emissions lowered by multiple climate targets. Nature 499, 197–201 (2013).

461 Steinacher, M. & Joos, F. Transient Earth system responses to cumulative carbon dioxide emissions: linearities, uncertainties, and probabilities in an observation-constrained model ensemble. Biogeosciences 13, 1071–1103 (2016).

462 Tokarska, K. B., Gillett, N. P., Weaver, A. J., Arora, V. K. & Eby, M. The climate response to five trillion tonnes of carbon. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 851–855 (2016).

463 Williams, R. G., Goodwin, P., Roussenov, V. M. & Bopp, L. A framework to understand the transient climate response to emissions. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 15003 (2016).

464 Frölicher, T. L., Winton, M. & Sarmiento, J. L. Continued global warming after CO2 emissions stoppage. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 40–44 (2013).

465 Gillett, N. P., Arora, V. K., Zickfeld, K., Marshall, S. J. & Merryfield, W. J. Ongoing climate change following a complete cessation of carbon dioxide emissions. Nat. Geosci. 4, 83–87 (2011).

466 Solomon, S., Plattner, G.-K., Knutti, R. & Friedlingstein, P. Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 1704–1709 (2009).

467 Solomon, S. et al. Persistence of climate changes due to a range of greenhouse gases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 18354–18359 (2010).

468 Ehlert, D. & Zickfeld, K. What determines the warming commitment after cessation of CO2 emissions? Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 15002 (2017).