Can we address the "waste of a WTF is" video accusation that seems to pop up everytime I do a game I don't like? Dismiss the idea immediately that WTF is has been or will ever be a recommendations series. The process is simple. I see a game that looks interesting for some reason or another, I play it and then I give my opinion. I move onto the next game. If a game ends up being poor, I don't simply abandon it and move onto another one, I make the video regardless, because I assume that since I found the games premise interesting, otehr people also would. I've already commited the time to making it at that point. The actual filming is what takes the least time, assuming I nail it first take, it's the research on the title that takes the bulk of the time, so once that research is done, it would be extremely inefficient to toss all of that away. The idea that a WTF is video can be "wasted" on a title makes no sense, it assumes that instead of that video there would be another. No, there would not, there'd either be that video or no video, especially right now when the time in which I can comfortably work is limited. Sometimes there'll be bad games covered in WTF is, that's how all criticism works, sometimes it's gonna cover something bad. This is not a "best games on Steam" series. Thanks for your understanding and please stop making these silly accusations, it's becoming a pet peeve.