Libertarian color Women have...

... no right to abort at any point after the conception.

... no right to abort unless they are in danger from complications.

... the right to abort before some point during the pregnancy for specific, important, reasons (eg rape, complications etc).

... the right to abort before some point during the pregnancy for any reason. (e.g before the neural system is fully formed, before hearbeat etc)

... the right to abort at any point during the pregnancy for any reason.



Assuming that there is no way to get rid of the welfare state for now, asking the state to use force to restrict or control people who try to cross the borders of your country...

... is preferable and compatible with libertarian ethics.

... is NOT compatible with libertarian ethics but it is currently the preferable solution.

... is not compatible with libertarian ethics and is not even preferable as a temporary solution.



Hypothetically, if I could prove to you that fully following libertarian ethics would, for the foreseeable future, lead to a world where the vast majority of the people would consider themselves worse off compared to their current state, would you still insist on fully following libertarian ethics?

Yes, I would stick to libertarian ethics.

No, I would not stick to libertarian ethics if I was given proof that they lead to a worse world for most people.







The redder your color is, the more easily you allow abortions. The greener your color is, the more you insist on open borders. The bluer your color is, the more you favor deontologism over utilitarianism.



