Hyacinth

2017-01-24 15:46:44 -0500

“Problem is it wouldn’t sink or swim on its own accord if it is already under ‘outside’ influence. Their funding would come from Soros et al.”



Currently the brunt of the burden is carried by the taxpayers, it is a hefty yearly price tag. It may be a too big of a yearly price tag for the likes of even Soros. It is the control aspect, if all of CBC’s reigning control is stripped it will have little effect in comparison to how they can dictate to the rest of MSM currently. Like turning off the electricity in a building doesn’t make the building go away it simply makes living there that much more difficult. CBC would eventually either sink or have to downsize radically to keep afloat financially. If CBC is radically reduced in size so too would its reach.



I can see an entire new can of worms being opened if the populace could vote for the CEO – promises of select nepotism and platform promises (bribes) would become commonplace, elections virtually rigged by third party funding meddling, and so on. Best to defund, strip it of all control, then let it sink or swim on its own.

commented