4% weight

Narrow niche project. The idea is excellent and knowing people from the sphere of art, there really is a problem with the verification and confirmation of the propriety, the ownership rights to the products of art. The use-case of the blockchain in this area takes place.



The team is average. They have an experience in the business sphere, programming, the foundation of start-up companies. It is also great that there are partnerships with key people in this niche.



Tokenomics - just a utility token (ERC20) is definitely a minus. It would be great if there was a mechanism for staking tokens for owners of art galleries, expert agencies and so on. A utility token has a very fast turnover period that will not contribute to the growth of its price, You can buy tokens on exchange and sell it very easy.



Of the obvious cons:

1) There is no product, a prototype or at least something, and will not be until sale

2) Hardcap of $20M is clearly overstated for such a product. This is not a blockchain of its own but just a Dapp, an ERC20 token ... for example, QuarkChain collected 20M, but they make their own blockchain. It is better to collect less, but then the token would grow in value, and not vice versa ...

3) No information about bonuses for private/presale

+1 Agree +1

+1