01:04 Trump Budget Calls for Cuts to National Weather Service President Trump’s new budget calls for cuts to the National Weather Service. Is that really a good idea?

At a Glance The National Weather Service is under the umbrella of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

The NOAA budget proposes a $75 million cut in funding for the NWS of its total $1 billion budget.

The budget also calls for the elimination of 355 jobs, including 248 forecasting jobs.

In the wake of the costliest weather disaster year on record , the Trump administration has proposed cutting funding by 8 percent for the National Weather Service and eliminating of hundreds of jobs in the department.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's 2019 fiscal budget summary released Monday calls for the NWS agency under the NOAA to cut 355 jobs, including 248 forecasting positions. The overall budget cut for the NWS would amount to just over $75 million of its $1 billion overall budget requested by NOAA.

The summary notes that the administration justifies the job elimination on the 2016 Weather Service Operations and Workforce Analysis , which found “a mismatch in some areas [of the Weather Service] between workforce and workload” and “that the current distribution of staff across the country can evolve.”

The proposal directs the NWS to reduce staff to increase “flexibility within NWS’ operating model” and “begin implementing a series of operational reforms aimed at increasing staffing flexibility to best match service demands with available resources.”

Meteorologists say the budget proposal may put lives at risk.

(MORE: 2017 Was the Most Costly Weather Disaster Year in the United States )

“The proposed NWS cuts are especially troubling given that the nation just saw its most expensive year for weather disasters on record," meteorologist Bob Henson of Weather Underground said. "The NWS forecasters I know are passionate about their jobs and dedicated to serving the public. They’ve also been stretched thin by understaffing. If we want a world-class weather service, we ought to fully fund it.”

In October, the National Weather Service Employees Organization said the agency is “for the first time in its history teetering on the brink of failure ” as reductions in staffing left scientists overworked and stressed.

“It’s gotten so bad that we’re not going to be able to provide service that two years ago we were able to provide to public, emergency managers and media,” said Dan Sobien, the president of the union. “We’ve never been in that position before.”

Staff vacancies at the agency increased 57 percent from 2014 to 2016, according to an independent report from the Government Accountability Office. The union suggests that the number of vacancies has actually reached nearly 700. The union notes that the decrease in staffing is not necessarily tied to a lack funding but because funds allocated were not earmarked for staffing.

Sobien told weather.com Tuesday that if the budget proposal is approved, it would mean that by 2019, more than a quarter of the NWS staff would be eliminated.

"That means many offices will have to close or close nights and weekends," Sobien said of the proposed staffing cuts. "Already, many NWS staff work months at a time with no days off and are forced overtime."

"What you will see is a decrease in forecasting and warning accuracy," Sabien said, adding that inaccurate forecasting will "cost us all a whole lot more than $75 million."

"Literally, this (proposed budget) is risking all of our lives to save a few million dollars," he added.