Call the fashion police!

A Manhattan judge dismissed a woman’s prostitution case, saying the NYPD failed to recognize what constitutes a working girl’s wardrobe.

Police arrested Felicia McGinnis, 26, after spotting her talking to passersby on Seventh Avenue while wearing a “black pea coat, skinny jeans and platform shoes” in the wee hours of Jan. 9.

“Any current issue of a fashion magazine would display plenty of women similarly dressed,” wrote Judge Felicia Mennin in her Oct. 15 decision slamming cops for their sartorial arrest rationale. “However, the choice of such outfit hardly demonstrates the wearer’s proclivity to engage in prostitution.”

According to court papers, a veteran vice cop in Midtown North saw McGinnis speak to three people near West 48th Street in a 20-minute period.

He didn’t specify whether the passersby were male or who started the conversations but charged McGinnis with loitering for the purpose of prostitution.

The cop said McGinnis’ denim was revealing because it “outlined” her legs, according to the ruling.

Mennin disagreed — and gave cops a lesson on streetwalker style, noting past cases where cops busted hookers who wore only leopard-print bathing suits.

“[The] characterization of the jeans as ‘revealing’ because they ‘outlined the defendant’s legs’ seems more to be expected in the dress code of a 1950s high school than a criminal-court pleading,” Mennin wrote.

“Granted, this incident occurred in the middle of winter,” Mennin added. “However, a pea coat is still standard issue to members of the US Navy . . . and blue jeans, skin-tight or baggy, are practically an American icon.”

Mennin dismissed the case, even though McGinnis had a prostitution rap sheet longer than her spiked heels.

The NYPD has arrested her 16 times on prostitution-related charges since 2011. Records show she’s been cuffed dozens of times in other states.

The cop who arrested McGinnis had previously booked her for hooking, according to court papers. When he approached McGinnis that night, she allegedly fumed, “You guys haven’t seen me for a minute. Can’t you give me a break?”

This time her getup got her off.

“The defendant’s clothing in this case stands in stark contrast to the clothing relied upon as circumstantial proof of loitering for purposes of prostitution,” Mennin wrote.

“We disagree with the court’s ruling. Based on all the circumstances — which included much more than clothing — there was clearly probable cause to arrest.” said an NYPD spokesman John McCarthy.

Additional reporting by Daniel Prendergast