etotheipi





Offline



Activity: 1428

Merit: 1041





Core Armory Developer







LegendaryActivity: 1428Merit: 1041Core Armory Developer The official Armory-for-OSX Bounty Thread [CLAIMED -- 25 BTC] March 10, 2013, 01:03:36 AM

Last edit: April 13, 2013, 04:37:30 PM by etotheipi #1 Total Bounty Accumulated: 24.75 BTC

(last updated, Mar 10, 1:10am EST)

(Donation address on blockchain.info)





User "higuys" has claimed the bounty!



You can get the first unofficial release of the OSX build from this thread!



Original Message:



The number of users offering bounties for a native OSX package for Armory has reached critical mass.



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Hash: SHA1



The following address is owned by Alan Reiner (Core Armory

Developer) and will be used to collect donations to be given

as a bounty for the successful packaging of Armory for OSX.

All donations will be maintained by Alan Reiner, and

distributed at his sole discretion.



1Armory1HBqc8dNEvHDuT9AYWPWf98aCzJ



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)



iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRO9osAAoJEEqxauqYgyIjzWAP/AubsJ/zQb3/jFbLV5CcK8tR

wF+8JzjVQyOWFH2nPQL3LNQ2pgyUgghBHGzm1FVslHeJ3Ahf+4D3o+W73ntqXKKx

SLjyy6ZQVJLgCazWVlKcKEoE+lwNJs1oj3Zl3BdO3jwpxy6J3LqtufZkPhdawXD2

ul5ECfGFQDcONVLA4RbzgNmrgEbGNvCJdlVeQ/gZ5uMAv5vsbGaIywK55t/lEzrl

2eg3YPjRf0txYQ0/hyqfmc8ZkS0i2OnWR9c+HiKOOdGD6GaZdSUa29EDlMdQnc8T

tcGZI32ym/yxk641UkgjAmC2CbGpSmtbSJWSwrMSCGfWzV57khDYoNZJBS0wfUUP

g/FWPfyAbl2WJ394fYuTHwO2Hknd+d65lW59VlqZU2R/WWWqb+SKOW49OM8PkVFw

YKnI3xJuZFMw6AC7xxZhVB2oF0Pja5xlRjLJKQfJ0Gdk32pU/zfN72CqWjncnxvq

2+jhiP6Tv5PKWa0dB8u56occM2MDWXs0cuXnSHOz3dLCWxXTgFk5/lulsV8Bw8Y3

OO9eVIYQQz9nD4UKXQeUiJaxOl/i1Wq2LBECOWFnExC9FsVbupKPc7NLVtF+OFyS

U8F8hWLISYW+bYaafJxb5XFiYqMdAdLqsiR6Y7XTykVLKuRjH0ImmrPhfgn1OKLD

hvLhfu9rLsxBQuQqu8ww

=IGsm

-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----







I will hold onto the funds and decide how to distribute it. I will not distribute any to myself, unless there is some reasonable consensus that I should do so (like, I ended up figuring it out myself because no one else did). Otherwise, I will look to this thread for feedback, and then will make the decision how to proceed. Partial credit is possible.



Red Emerald has mentioned that bundling Armory is not easy. py2app didn't work smoothly at all. There's a few awkward dependencies, including bundling PyQt4 in its entirety. Luckily, I know that the Bitcoin-Qt dev team has successfully bundled Qt4 into their package, so their packaging scheme might serve as a good starting point for this task.



@Red Emerald: Of course, I was looking in your direction to be the exalted warrior of this bounty, but there is no obligation.



I don't currently have a developer key for OSX, but I plan to get one eventually so that I can properly sign the OSX packages. I prefer a solution that extends easily to being natively signed, but I guess I'd still be happy with any kind of standalone packaging. It's worth discussing in this thread what can be done to guarantee the solution allows for that (or acknowledge that any correct solution is signable).









Some of you may have seen my previous rant about how I don't like bounties of this form, and much prefer to raise money to pay someone to work on it up front. Part of the justification for that rant is that most projects for which bounties are declared, may require months of work, and do not have a clear definition of success -- especially when inter-project priorities change, feasibility issues justify changing directions, and there is vast disagreement about what is "complete", etc. In this case, I think the task is relative short, and the exit criteria is pretty clear, so there shouldn't be any controversy about it.



I'd also like to see this thread used for collaboration. If there is significant progress made through the collaboration with others in this thread, then I will probably decide to split the bounty. Any splits will be in increments of 10% only. I will not be giving 0.36% to one, 1.83% to another, etc. If people feel like they deserve a small piece for their contribution, they can ask the person who received the bounty to toss them a few bits! Otherwise, your reward for contributing is that you helped make the OSX distributable package possible! (last updated, Mar 10, 1:10am EST)User "higuys" has claimed the bounty! More information here The number of users offering bounties for a native OSX package for Armory has reached critical mass. Red Emerald has done a phenomenal job making it available through some brew commands at the terminal, but it's not a long-term solution. Eventually, Armory needs to be accessible to the audience of users that have never seen a terminal. So, I'm announcing a official bounty for anyone who gives me a solid "recipe" for distributing Armory on OSX:I will hold onto the funds and decide how to distribute it. I will not distribute any to myself, unless there is some reasonable consensus that I should do so (like, I ended up figuring it out myself because no one else did). Otherwise, I will look to this thread for feedback, and then will make the decision how to proceed. Partial credit is possible.Red Emerald has mentioned that bundling Armory is not easy. py2app didn't work smoothly at all. There's a few awkward dependencies, including bundling PyQt4 in its entirety. Luckily, I know that the Bitcoin-Qt dev team has successfully bundledinto their package, so their packaging scheme might serve as a good starting point for this task.: Of course, I was looking in your direction to be the exalted warrior of this bounty, but there is no obligation.I don't currently have a developer key for OSX, but I plan to get one eventually so that I can properly sign the OSX packages. I prefer a solution that extends easily to being natively signed, but I guess I'd still be happy with any kind of standalone packaging. It's worth discussing in this thread what can be done to guarantee the solution allows for that (or acknowledge that any correct solution is signable).Some of you may have seen my previous rant about how I don't like bounties of this form, and much prefer to raise money to pay someone to work on it up front. Part of the justification for that rant is that most projects for which bounties are declared, may require months of work, and do not have a clear definition of success -- especially when inter-project priorities change, feasibility issues justify changing directions, and there is vast disagreement about what is "complete", etc. In this case, I think the task is relative short, and the exit criteria is pretty clear, so there shouldn't be any controversy about it.I'd also like to see this thread used for collaboration. If there is significant progress made through the collaboration with others in this thread, then I will probably decide to split the bounty. Any splits will be in increments of 10% only. I will not be giving 0.36% to one, 1.83% to another, etc. If people feel like they deserve a small piece for their contribution, they can ask the person who received the bounty to toss them a few bits! Otherwise, your reward for contributing is that you helped make the OSX distributable package possible!

Armory Bitcoin Wallet: Bringing

Only use Armory software signed by the



(or donate directly via 1QBDLYTDFHHZAABYSKGKPWKLSXZWCCJQBX -- yes, it's a real address!) Founder and CEO of Armory Technologies, Inc. : Bringing cold storage to the average user!Only use Armory software signed by the Armory Offline Signing Key (0x98832223) Please donate to the Armory project by clicking here! (or donate directly via 1QBDLYTDFHHZAABYSKGKPWKLSXZWCCJQBX -- yes, it's a real address!)