Finally, we don't KNOW that these mass killers ARE NOT BEING CONTROLLED by intelligence forces with an advanced technology. It could be a chemical substance causing them to do these things and we wouldn't know.

It could also be technology like 5G. I've done deep research on 5G and the capabilites and proved beyond any doubt by the science that is known and published on NIH.gov for example that 5G has the feasibilty to target areas deep in the brain by way of the lilly wave (balanced bidirectional ('biphasic') pulsed pair) that is enabled by the new capabilities of 5G wifi--specifically QAM and beamforming working together. If one can use qam and beamforming with the highighter signal power of 5G, one could target individuals with signal and one could send specific signals to a specific part of the brain and potentially activate a person (a foster person or orphan) who has been programmed by torture in the past (sleeper cell) or cause paranoid schizophrenia in a person who is already vulnerable

Back to the chemical substance theory

I can tell you that if I had a particular substance I could create a mass murderer. This substance is NOT controlled in america and we have to ask WHY IT IS. This substance is scopolamine, and it occurs in many plants that are NOT illegal. Pot is illegal and mostly harmless, but toxic scopolameine is NOT illegal in america

I think it SHOULD be. It's dangerous because it takes away a persons free will and makes it so they can be "commanded' by another. This substance, known as 'burundaga' in latin america, is used by crimninal to poison someone's drink and then either rape them or control them....and usually they have peopel commit robberies and murders so they are the ones that are blamed

We must PROVE that these mass murderers are NOT under the influence of burundaga / toloache / scopolamine or a similar analogue or substance with the same activity. We are going to have to get an autopsy of these peopel and even then we won't knwo if the FBI has covered up the autopsy with a fake autopsy. That is why I would have the USMS or some other group seize the corpse of the shooter and have multiple autopsies by random lotter of pathologist and publish the results

The FBI, because of all their criminality and coverups of converups they cannot be trusted anymore

If we catch them alive, we need to give them a live fMRI scan and see if their brain scan looks like psychopathy, because then we'll have our answer and a possible solution to mass shooting. Which is that EVERYONE in america needs to get an fMRI scan in order to get not only a gun but also a job.

I think a civil society will identify psychopaths with a battery of tests and multiple independent (non political) evaluators, and then treat them like sex offenders or worse. I don't believe in "thought crimes" and I also don't believe it's "fair" to limit their opportunities but it's also not fair to non-psycopaths, so the best thing to do is quarantine them by putting them on a fair dole, provide for them, but keep them away from society--deliver food and services TO them, and if they go out and about, you monitor them like they are AL QUEDA becasue they are effectively potentially just as bad. You don't let them have memberships in groups, you don't ever allow them to represent anyone in america, you don't let them make decisions and you don't allow them access to guns

Mental Illness

Actually we don't know if the problem is mental illness. I can tell you people are not going around killing people because they are depressed, or have ocd, or are bipolar, or are borderline, or are mildly to moderately schizophrenic (being schizo doesn't make you go on gun rampages, most who are schizo know they are schizo); or have a panoply of other disorders. Being weird or confused doesn't make you go on gun rampages. Being 'metnally ill' is a new type of social "smear" against people and it's very unkind and it's actually very wrong / unethical for people to keep screeching about it

I am mentally ill and I take offense. Being mentally ill does not make you into an amoral murderhappy misanthrope, and the idea that I have to be worried about saying that I'm mentally ill in society becausae of shooters--that offends me. Its unfair. I would never do it. 99.99% of mentally ill people woudl not do it. These generalizations are mean but entirely expected of younger generations who can't even figure out 9/11

Anyway, ...

There is a very narrow reason why someone who is mentally ill would go on a rampage, and those reasons are as follows: 1) they are psychopaths and sociopaths--as in they have zero empathy and they are angry and are in a position in life where they have no future, 2) they are antisocial personality disorder, which is again, has overlaps with psychopathy and finally 3) they are criminals, which have one or the other of the previos, or both--a conduct disorder and an ideation, AND presentation of lawlessness. I would add to this that Satanism has a play in this but not all satanists are criminals. I actually like a particular satanist online, Styxhexenhammer666--he's a good person who has a good philosophy. I'm not talking about him. I'm talking about the type of crowleyian satanist that 'does what they wilt as the whole of the law'--someone who worships criminality and feels that their fulfillment of their worship is TO break the law and cause normal people suffering

So these descriptions of people are pretty much an extraordinarily narrow description of "mentally ill people that would cause mass murders" -- that and peolpe who are completely dissociated frrom reality--the criminally insane--paranoid schizophrenics. Not people who hear voices. People who don't knwo what's real at all