CANADA is



a SPIRITUAL SHIT-HOLE

From sea to shitty sea.

We have said this for decades…but who is listening???

The corporation (CUNTry) of CANADA – inclusive of its “SHITizens” – is only getting worse and worse.

Feminists, manginas, maggots, faggots and their assorted filthy enablers are taking over and don’t want to stop, despite all warnings and judgments to the contrary. The Canada’s Shame Flag is indicative of the fruit of FEMINISM, WITCHCRAFT and REBELLION. Shit-Souls possessed by these Function Demons love death.

The reason we have chosen – at present – to make this the first Post you see/read on the front page of our site is to expose the vagocracy, the Feminist Fiefdom, the wicked world of witchcraft that Canada is. Let’s not leave out the HAVEN-FOR-HATEFUL-HOMOS that Communist Canada also is.

Facts Hidden By Filth

Most souls have never heard of or seen these statistics because of the antiChrist agenda and bias in the Communist Canadian media. Thus, we have to get the truth out ourselves.

The linked and excerpted article below is written by Walter Schneider, a Men’s & Father’s Rights activist in Canada. As much as we agree with Walter and the truths he expounds, TRUST CHRIST OR GO TO HELL!™ Worldwide Ministries does not agree that the “vast majority of men and women are non-violent”.

We list just a few sins and crimes that femcunts and manginas commit in Canada everyday, mostly at tax-slaves’ expense:

LIES

FALSE ACCUSATIONS

FRAUD

KIDNAPPING

THEFT

TORTURE

MURDER (of babies) and others (mostly Men/Fathers)

Add some more crimes to this list in the comments.

Is it any wonder that these crimes are committed against normal Men & Fathers every day? Not when you know who is running the show:

Filthy faggots

Manginas

Masons

Witches

Femcunts

These are acts of violence against Men and Fathers (and the occasional mother that won’t bend before them) that are enabled by the Socialst/Communist Canadian State. (Remember that the Nazis were/are National SOCIALISTS who revered/worshiped the State. The term FemiNazi is aptly used for witches in power; vagocrat is another excellent term. Manginas enable them.)

The Criminal Code in Canada includes mental torture as part of its definition of the crime named “torture”. Clearly, that is also violent: especially when carried out by the State Agents of Sodom themselves! (For more detail on the filthy, fraudulent, criminal Agents of Sodom in the Crown itself, see the link on LIANNA “LIE-ANNA JEZEBEL” SWANSON and her cohorts across Communist Canada in the Page on Lawyers in Canada. Be prepared to vomit: the femcunt/faggot/manginic corruption is beyond what you could think.)

Also, Walter’s article mentions ‘judicial bias’: in point of fact, it is governmental – femcunt/misandric agencies, police, lawyers, judges, etc. – systemic bias against Men/Fathers. This misandry is not limited to ‘judicial’ arenas: the pigs (police) refuse to even charge women with crimes despite facts and evidence proving them guilty!! In fact, they are most often complicit in enabling criminal femcunts in their filthiness!!

WELCOME TO CANADA:

THE CULT OF THE CUNT

_______________________________________

Women’s Violence, SS-Wives and Karla Homolka.

(this is a snippet from his page)

Although the current bias in our perceptions in favour of women and against men–in relation to their respective tendencies to be violent–has largely been created through the efforts of radical, extremist feminists throughout the last twenty years, to some extent this bias has been in existence throughout history.

A prime example of the bias in favour of women is the case of Karla Homolka. Certainly, no valid conclusions can be drawn from a statistical sample of one. Nevertheless, although it is a fact that women are as violent as men, relative to men, very few women serve time in correctional institutions at any time. (VIN’S NOTE: Fewer still are even charged with crimes at all, despite facts proving them guilty!! God damn these cursed Canadians!!)

The ratio of incarceration for men and women in Canada is 100:1 and in the USA it is about 18:1.

Given that our nations have virtually identical cultural backgrounds and cultures, the only possible explanation for the disparity in the respective incarceration ratios in the two countries is given by differences in judicial bias in favour of women.

The reason for the greater bias against men in Canada is most likely the fact for which Canada is internationally renowned, that it is a country in which liberalism and its children, gender-feminism and victim-feminism, have made greater advances than in all other countries in the world.

The reason for the differences can most certainly not be that Canadian men, relative to Canadian women, are more than five times as violent or criminal than American men are relative to American women.

Women, just as anyone else in any play for power, direct their violence primarily against victims who are weaker than they are, the sleeping, the elderly, the sick, the intoxicated, the handicapped, the unsuspecting, and, most of all, their children. The violence by women against children is such a large problem, caused by the inability of juries and courts to equitably sentence women for murder, that a special category of crime had to be created that can only be used in the indictment and prosecution of women who murder their children: infanticide. In all other cases of women’s violence, it is virtually always claimed that something or someone made them do it, an excuse that is virtually never used for men. To mention some of these excuses: hormones, post-traumatic stress disorder, temporary insanity, battered-wife syndrome, Munchausen syndrome by proxy, even “automatism,” all of these and many more are applied in cases of women’s violence, but virtually never in cases of men’s violence.

For men THERE IS NO EXCUSE!

There is always the desire to find women innocent. Failing that and if no denial is possible in the face of the evidence, women’s sentences are plea-bargained down to a lesser charge, which, incidentally, often removes the crime from the category of murder, child murder, spousal murder and so on, and moves it into a category that falls outside the scope of the more serious offences. As a result of that, crime statistics published by justice departments do not give an objective indication of women’s violence but rather identify only the results of judicial bias in favour of women.

Society’s inability to accept that women are often violent has serious consequences for the victims and potential victims of women’s violence. Without admitting that women can be and often are violent, we are unable to take precautions to protect the most vulnerable potential victims from women’s violence. We don’t even make the attempt to rehabilitate women who are a potential danger to society and their children, and, rather than to deal with the stark reality of women’s violence, we let them off lightly, often without them having to serve any time at all in a correctional institution. Thereby we give them the opportunity to torture, maim and kill new victims time and again. Not only that, but because we treat them so lightly, we give women the message that is is all right for them to be violent. The consequence of that is that, although violence by male youth and men steadily and substantially declined during the last decade or so, violence by women and especially by teenaged girls has seen accelerating increases during the same time frame.

Women’s violence is nevertheless virtually invisible. It becomes visible only then when a woman is involved in committing a particularly horrible and bloody crime. Patricia Pearson addresses the myth of women’s innocence in her book “When She Was Bad: Violent Women and the Myth of Innocence.” Although she provides much information to debunk many of the popular myths (she debunks even the myth that there are no female mass murderers), even she, in spite of her deliberate objectivity in reporting on women’s violence, forgot or was blind to massive instances of women’s violence in recent history, the violence of French women during the French Revolution, and the violence by 240,000 women in Nazi-Germany who actively participated in the atrocities perpetrated by the SS, the wives of SS men, SS-Wives, whose involvement has been covered in considerable detail by Dr. Gudrun Schwarz in her book “A Wife at his Side: Wives in the SS Clan-Community.”

The judges at the war trials in Germany were unable to face reality in the case of the SS-women. They were in denial of women’s violence even then, in the post-war climate of trying to blame someone for the crimes committed by the Nazis. They issued a general amnesty that included many women whose crimes were in reality far worse and far more frequent than anything that Karla Homolka did. How can we expect a more equitable view of the respective propensities of the sexes to commit violence today, when politically-correct man-hating and vilification of men runs rampant in a political climate charged with propaganda against men, propaganda that uses deliberately falsified and deliberately distorted facts and figures?