He was illustrating that even if major internet companies censor/delete leaked evidence, it WILL be archived by us. Even though he deleted the email post, which was an exclusive original to only that chan board, it is very easy to find a copy of the email itself now that it’s even TOUCHED the internet.

What he was saying in his last few posts is this: there is a flood of NSA disclosures coming down the pike. Twitter, facebook, etc. can shoot these posts down, but they WILL be archived before that happens by us, and they can’t censor the whole internet, so spread that shit from site to site!

I agree with Tracy Beanz about the Fakies. It amped us for community participation, and big internet was even prepared to censor that day. They WEREN’T prepared for the following day with #releasethememo (just like we weren’t). Additionally, #releasethememo was likely much more successful in exposure because white hats actually interfered the following day, while allowing black hats to run rough-shod the day before for false sense of security.

This is Checkmate, if i ever done seen!

https://qcodefag.github.io/data/images/12be822f398904a6981d207b31854dbde63481d35a84703030debfbdb2ed3ca8.jpg

-EDIT- Relevant Q posts in text below:

119569 Not from WL. [CLAS-N-DI_9] gg_dump [No Such Agency]. It does not technically exist as open-source. Q ^ the above post is in direct response to a chan post referring to the email^ 119877 Will the FBI recover those missing texts? [Nothing is ever truly deleted]. Your move. Q 119769 The flood is coming. Emails, videos, audio, pics, etc. FBI accidentally deletes texts? No Such Agency accidentally releases IT ALL> Shall we play a game? Q 44 Why are we here? Why are we providing crumbs? Think MEMO. BUILDING THE ARMY. Not convinced this is spreading? You, the PEOPLE, have THE POWER. You, the PEOPLE, just forgot how to PLAY. TOGETHER you are STRONG. APART you are weak. THEY WANT YOU DIVIDED. THEY WANT RACE WARS. THEY WANT CLASS WARS. THEY WANT RELIGIOUS WARS. THEY WANT POLITICAL WARS. THEY WANT YOU DIVIDED! LEARN! FOR GOD & COUNTRY - LEARN! STAY STRONG. STAY TOGETHER. FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT. This is more important than you can imagine. Q

-EDIT 2- From mcthornbody420: “That email was discussed in 2016 right after the dump. I know for a fact there was a thread on it on glp when it dropped on 16.

From 10/31/16 http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message3342535/pg1”

So the email isn’t a chan exclusive/original. That being said, the only standard that the people in that thread use to debunk the email is that it doesn’t exist in the wikileaks database (which q acknowledges), and that it is rather blatant.

I personally believe that this is not enough evidence to discredit the email. Although the fact that this discussion happened in October 2016 in tandem with the Podesta dump is suspect, it could have leaked earlier, only to be scrutinized at the time of wikileak’s publishing. Leaking at the same time wouldn’t necessarily mean it’s fake regardless, as the leaking source for wikileaks could have been the same as this email.

It still conveys the idea that nothing on the internet is truly lost. My thoughts on why these people truly ARE careless enough for this blatancy are in the comments section below.

Consider that a SCIF takes 10 days to set up, and it is highly unlikely that the powerful bother with 10 days of latency whenever they want to communicate. Further, they’ve demonstrated many times, as Q repeatedly points out, that they’ve built a culture of carelessness regarding comms. “These people are stupid”. As Ed from Outer Dark would say, “decide for yourself”

-FINAL EDIT- Some of the commenters are making quite convincing cases to remain skeptical of the email, and Q’s recent posts themselves. Lieutenant Col. Potter has also expressed worry that twitter verification by POTUS is not necessarily fool proof, if people at twitter (and likely elsewhere) have historical capability of hijacking his account (they’ve at least disabled it in the past, and project veritas exposed how their manipulation goes a lot further.)

It is entirely possible and must be considered that CIA is posing as Q to discredit him in the future, perhaps with mass “leaks” of misinformation, that Q’s followers will eagerly spread without vetting.

As of now, i am erring on believing Q in their current form. As tracy beanz said, their dumps are still useful and socratic in nature. Even so, vigilance is ever necessary, and the devil will tell 99% truth for one great lie. As Potter says, “we will know by their fruits.” I eagerly await the Nunes memo

-FINAL FINAL EDIT- Sorry for all the wishy-washing you guys, but this is an important conversation. From THAD_K_CUNDERTHOCK: “The WHOIS information for macklerr.com shows that it was first registered on Oct. 31, 2016 - the same day that the purported email from toddemail@macklerr.com appeared on the Web:

http://whois.domaintools.com/macklerr.com

In other words, there's no way an email could have been sent from macklerr.com more than 7 months before that (Mar. 19, 2016).

This is a strong indication that the email is fake.

Doesn't mean Q is fake.”

This strongly indicates to me that the current iteration of Q is not sourcing from NSA databases and is indeed compromised. This doesn’t mean that Q is ALWAYS fake, but please remain skeptical!!! After this evidence, I can’t say i trust the newest Q posts. Again, we will see what happens with this memo. Remember, this is an intelligence war, and the drawback to welcoming in the public is that we are very inexperienced with discernment and at the mercy of our limited tools and disclosures