Wealth taxes are now rising fast up the global political agenda. For OECD countries, taxes on “property” have declined as a share of all taxes, from close to eight percent of all taxes in the 1960s, to a little over five percent in 1980, a level at which they have stagnated ever since.

The graph above is quite striking, for several reasons. The big surprise in this case is that all the justifiable political anger that has followed the global financial crisis – a crisis created by global élites – has not translated into meaningfully higher wealth or property taxes.

But the public mood seems to be steadily shifting, in a number of countries. One place where this is happening is the UK, where two new reports, one after the other, make the case for wealth taxes.

The first came from the IPPR, a progressive British think tank, with a fine report entitled A Wealth of Difference: Reforming the taxation of wealth.

Anyone worried about the recent trends in global politics and economics should agree that we need to start taxing wealth properly, and this report makes some simple but essential points. The main ones can be summarised:

that all income from wealth is taxed under the income tax schedule

that inheritance tax is abolished and replaced with a lifetime gift tax paid by the recipient;

that the UK removes its “non-dom” status, a hangover from colonial day, which allows “non-domiciled” residents in the UK to escape tax on their non-UK income

that trusts are reformed to be more transparent.

replace the council tax with an annual property tax, and

replace business rates with a land value tax. We are in general agreement with all of this, with a couple of provisos. First, on inheritance taxes, one needs to be very careful striking out one revenue-raising measure from unearned wealth, in case that the alternative gets derailed. Will taxing the recipient be harder to avoid than otherwise? Probably yes, in the main. But this won’t solve all problems. It won’t necessarily address the issue of “ownerless assets” in trusts, especially offshore trusts, where the asset has been given away into the trust, but not received by anyone yet, and is sitting in some sort of limbo – yet with various parties still having the power to enjoy or control that asset. (For example, Daddy’s put his mansion into a trust structure, and the trusts’ rules allow the children full use of the mansion, without them actually owning any of it.) Any discussion of trusts soon gets into the weeds – and this applies to the requirement to make trusts more transparent: the recommendation is quite right, but the details are squirrelly. See our report on trusts for more.

Taxing all income from wealth under the income tax schedule is an excellent idea. (Why should wealth be prioritised over hard work?) Land Value Tax is another great tax, whose time has come. We support it wholeheartedly, as part of a comprehensive tax system.

The second report comes from Tax Justice UK, a newish offshoot of TJN. This one takes a spending line – funding for the National Health Service – and then looks at what is needed to fund it. In short, a good place to start is with wealth taxes. As the report notes: