We have known for many weeks that the FBI is investigating both the Russian government’s efforts to influence the outcome of the 2016 election and the possibility that members of Donald Trump’s campaign actively participated in those sabotage efforts.

Thanks to Reuters, though, we now have a much clearer sense of the parameters of the investigations and their possible targets. To complete the picture of who sabotaged the election and how, the FBI is conducting three simultaneous, but likely related, inquiries: first, to find the people behind the Democratic National Committee computer breaches; second, to identify the hacker or hackers who stole and leaked John Podesta’s emails; third, and most explosively, a “counterintelligence inquiry [that] includes but is not limited to examination of financial transactions by Russian individuals and companies who are believed to have links to Trump associates.”

This is all separate from the question of whether General Michael Flynn, Trump’s deposed national security adviser, lied to FBI agents in the course of their counterintelligence probe, though it is easy to imagine a scenario in which Flynn’s lies were part of larger story of espionage and political dirty tricks.

By the time they have all run their courses, these investigations might turn up little upon which U.S. law enforcement officials can act, or they might turn up the biggest political scandal in American history.

If the FBI concludes that Americans within Trump’s orbit colluded with Russian intelligence officials to disrupt the U.S. election, the evidence and prosecutions should speak for themselves. But no matter what conclusions the FBI ultimately comes to, its director, James Comey, owes the country a public accounting of what his agents found—even if nobody ends up being indicted.