With the Clintons you can always count on one thing — it’s never the crime; it’s the cover-up.

For more than a year former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has insisted her use of a private email server during her tenure at State was no big deal — nothing her predecessors didn’t do.

However, according to a new inspector general’s report, “By Secretary Clinton’s tenure, the department’s guidance was considerably more detailed and more sophisticated. Secretary Clinton’s cybersecurity practices accordingly must be evaluated in light of these more comprehensive directives.”

The IG also found, “Secretary Clinton should have preserved any federal records she created and received on her personal account by printing and filing those records… At a minimum Secretary Clinton should have surrendered all emails dealing with department business before leaving government service, and because she did not do so, she did not comply with the department’s policies…”

We also know she destroyed 32,000 emails because they were “personal.” How do we know that? Well, because she says so.

Mrs. Clinton has insisted she would “talk to anybody, any time” about the emails, adding, “I’ve encouraged all of [my staff] to be very forthcoming.”

Her three top staffers, including Huma Abedin, all refused to talk to the inspector general.

Clinton has insisted her information was secure.

The inspector general found that an adviser to Bill Clinton had to shut down the server on Jan. 9, 2011, because he believed “someone was trying to hack us.” Later that day he reported “we were attacked again so I shut [the server] down for a few min.”

The incident was never reported to computer security personnel at State.

And, of course, Clinton insists none of the information transmitted was classified “at the time,” but today we know at least 2,000 of Clinton’s messages were classified, some of them as “top secret.”

So many lies, so little time. And so very much for the FBI to sort out, let’s hope before November.