Consultant gynaecologist Dr Iftekhar Ahmed, 51, is accused of sexually motivated conduct while working at Princess Royal Health Centre in West Yorkshire

A senior doctor wiggled his tongue at a patient, asked if she liked 'licking' and suggested she bring sex toys to his surgery as he quizzed her about her love life, a medical tribunal heard on Tuesday.

Consultant gynaecologist Dr Iftekhar Ahmed, 51, posed a series of inappropriate questions to the woman, including what sexual positions she used with her partner and whether she used vibrators and other sexual aids, it was said.

During two consultations about safe sex at a community clinic, Ahmed also allegedly asked the patient if she watched pornography and even offered to download some on her laptop. He reportedly asked if she would bring the sex aids to the clinic so he could 'look at them'.

In the second encounter the married father-of two-asked about a new sex toy then allegedly conducted an intimate inspection of the woman's private parts without her consent and without offering her a chaperone.

It was also claimed he watched the patient undress and failed to offer her anything to cover her lower body later urging the woman not to tell anyone saying he would 'be in trouble'.

The woman known as Patient A, was said to have felt 'afraid, shocked, disgusted and vulnerable' by her treatment at the Princess Royal Health Centre in Huddersfield, West Yorkshire.

The Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service in Manchester was told the woman in her 40s had initially gone to the clinic for advice about sexual health in August 2013.

The married father-of two- allegedly conducted an intimate inspection of the woman's private parts without her consent and without offering her a chaperone

The incidents happened in August 2013 and January 2015 at community clinic, Princess Royal Health Centre in West Yorkshire (pictured)

Lawyer for the General Medical Council Mrs Emma Gilsenan said: 'He was working as a specialist doctor in obstetrics and gynaecology and worked in sexual health and urinary medicine.

'These were a course of two consultations with Patient A but Dr Ahmed asked her inappropriate questions about her private life which were not clinically indicated. He asked her what sexual positions occurred between Patient A and her partner.

'He asked her what sex toys she used and whether she liked 'licking' or words to that effect. After asking her this he began pulling his tongue out. He asked her whether she feels like having sex after an intimate examination was undertaken. He asked her if she liked pornography, and if she watched it. He also told her he could install pornography on her laptop at home.

'He asked her if he could come over to her address and install pornography on her laptop.'

The second consultation occurred in January 2015 during which Ahmed, of Alwoodley, Leeds, carried out two intimate examinations of Patient A.

A medical tribunal hearing was held on Tuesday, but Ahmed from Bangladesh was not there. He has since moved away from the UK - it is believed he currently lives in the U.S.

Mrs Gilsenan added: 'He touched the inside of her thighs and during the intimate examinations, he did not provide cover to her lower body, and watched her whilst she undressed.

'He then accessed her medical records to obtain her telephone number and telephoned her on one or more occasions. Dr Ahmed asked her more inappropriate questions about her private life, and installing pornography. There was a request from Dr Ahmed in relation to what was discussed during the consultation. He told her he would 'be in trouble'.

'There's an allegation he touched her without her consent and his actions were sexually motivated. Patient A in her witness statement says she was not offered a chaperone during the first examination. She claims he watched her whilst she got undressed.

'She felt afraid, shocked, disgusted and vulnerable. She was worried about speaking about it because he was an authority figure.

'This was a breach of trust. Dr Ahmed accepts undertaking intimate examinations with Patient A. He accepts asking questions in relation to sexual positions and toys, but claims they were clinically indicated and denies asking her to bring sex toys to the next consultation.

'He accepts he asks questions about her sex life, saying this was clinically motivated. He accepts he was asking about 'licking' claiming it was clinically motivated. He denies sexually motivated conduct. He accepts he stuck his tongue out at her and wiggled it.

'But he denies performing an intimate inspection of her without her consent, he denies watching her undress. He accepts he asked her about watching pornography. He accepts accessing her medical records to obtain her telephone number.

'He denies telling her he could attend her home to install pornography. He accepts telling her not to tell anyone, he accepts questioning her about sex toys and pornography and not recording it in her medical records.'

The woman, known as Patient A, told the tribunal: 'There was no misunderstanding, I knew exactly what he meant when he asked me these things'

But Patient A told the tribunal: 'There was no misunderstanding, I knew exactly what he meant when he asked me these things. I asked him if he had any free condoms and he got this package for me.

'Then he looked around in his office to check nobody was there and then straight away asked if I watched pornography. I wanted to say something but I didn't know what he would do. I just said yes. I was very confused and disgusted in myself.

'He said he could come to my house and download porn onto my laptop. I just wanted to get out, get my medication and my treatment. I didn't know why he kept asking me this. He did say: 'I'm just going to examine you, if that's okay with you'. I just said yes.

'He pulled the curtain across halfway and stood at the curtain and watched me undress. He just stood there and stared at me. This was an awkward situation, he just asked me to take my clothes off. He then told me to get on the bed and I did, I just said OK.

'After the first examination he asked me if I would like a chaperone and she came in this time and stood next to me. He acted as if the first examination next happened. This again was awkward for me. The assistant came in and asked me if I was okay, I must have looked terrified.

'His behaviour was not professional. He asked me if I liked the examination and asked me if I liked having sex.

'I wasn't comfortable seeing the same doctor both times, I wanted to see a different doctor but I didn't think they would let me. I felt that he shouldn't be asking me these questions.'

The hearing was told Ahmed from Bangladesh - who is not legally represented - was alerted to the tribunal but he has since moved away from the UK, it is believed he currently lives in America with his family.

The hearing, which is being held in his absence, continues.