The that the National Democratic Alliance government introduced in the Lok Sabha as a money Bill last week is wholly adopted from its predecessor United Progressive Alliance's (UPA's) version.

In a rare instance of not renaming or tinkering with it, the Bill neither plans to make the unique identification number mandatory or limit its issuance to citizens.

The Aadhaar (Target Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Bill, 2016, has, in fact, kept the character of the unique identification number intact.

If at all, the NDA government has only further strengthened both the issuance of Aadhaar number and its issuing authority, Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), with a legal backing.

Besides UIDAI, the Central Identities Data Repository, which functions under the authority as a service provider storing information, has also been given the statutory status.

According to the Bill, "every resident shall be entitled to obtain an Aadhaar number by submitting his demographic information and biometric information by undergoing the process of enrolment".

Though the NDA Bill is on the same lines as the National Identification Authority of India Bill, 2010, withdrawn from the Rajya Sabha last Thursday, the provision for Identity Review Committee has been skipped in the new Bill.

The National Identification Authority of India Bill, in Chapter V, provided for constitution of an Identity Review Committee, consisting of three members appointed by the central government on the recommendations of a committee consisting of the Prime Minister, the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, and a Union Cabinet minister to be nominated by the Prime Minister.

The committee was to ascertain the extent and pattern of usage of the Aadhaar numbers across the country and prepare a report annually.

The other difference is in the nature of Bill since it has been introduced by the NDA government as a money Bill unlike the UPA version, introduced by then Prime Minister Manmohan Singh as head of the Ministry of Planning.

Over 900 million people have already been enrolled for Aadhaar.

THE AADHAAR JOURNEY

On March 3, the central government introduced the in the Lok Sabha. Here is its seven-year journey: On March 3, the central government introduced the in the Lok Sabha. Here is its seven-year journey: Jan 28, 2009: The Unique Identification Authority of India, or UIDAI, is established through a resolution * The authority provides unique numbers to residents to serve as proof of identity and also for availing transfer of benefits, subsidies and services Dec 3, 2010: The United Progressive Alliance government introduces National Identification Authority of India Bill, 2010, in the Rajya Sabha to give Aadhaar a legal validity

The United Progressive Alliance government introduces National Identification Authority of India Bill, 2010, in the Rajya Sabha to give Aadhaar a legal validity Dec 13, 2011: The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance gives its report on Aadhaar

The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance gives its report on Aadhaar Sep 2013: The Supreme Court passes an order questioning the legal validity of Aadhaar

The Supreme Court passes an order questioning the legal validity of Aadhaar Oct 2013: The Union Cabinet clears a revised Bill

The Union Cabinet clears a revised Bill Mar 3, 2016: The revised Bill is introduced in the Lok Sabha as a money Bill — which the Rajya Sabha cannot reject or amend

Their demographic data such as name, date of birth, address and other details along with biometric information such as photo, fingerprints and iris scan is collected, databased and preserved by the UIDAI for authentication purposes.

An estimated expenditure of Rs 13,663.22 crore has been approved for implementing the Aadhaar scheme till 2016-17. Of which, Rs 6,844.34 crore has been spent for payments towards enrolments, logistics operations, Aadhaar Sampark Kendras, technology infrastructure and operations, etc, and Rs 408.49 crore has been spent towards establishment till December 31, 2015.

The current Bill retains the clause on Aadhaar not being a proof of citizenship or domicile (permanent residential status) for any person enrolled under this law. Though it is not mandatory, critics of the Bill pointed out that it did not seek to answer why the Aadhaar was necessary for providing "any kind of service" even where such services are provided by the private or social sector.

"This makes Aadhaar much more than a mere 'good governance measure' that empowers not only the state but also non-state actors who are service providers in the name of 'efficiency'," said Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (CHRI) in a statement.

According to the CHRI, there was a lack of uniformity of purpose of the Aadhaar. It points that the objective of "good governance measure is contradicted by Clause 57 placed at the very end of the Bill which says nothing contained in this Act shall prevent the use of the Aadhaar number for establishing the identity of an individual for any purpose, whether or not by the state or anybody corporate or person, pursuant to any law, for the time being in force, or any contract to this effect."