Last month we shared a warning to ignore the predictable post convention media polling nonsense. That warning remains valid today.

Just because the media is predictably beginning to sell poll stats beneficial to Donald Trump doesn’t mean they are any less manipulated.

On June 15th aggregate media polling had Hillary Clinton leading by 15 points. On July 15th the same media polling had Trump +17. On August 8th the pendulum swing was back to Hillary +15,…. and now today the media signals of a tied race begin.

It’s all nonsense. All of it. Polls don’t swing 20 to 30 +/- points every few weeks.

The media outlets conducting these polls have the same bias in their statistical representation as they publish in their daily event articles.

Examples:

CNN stated unequivocally an Olympic swimmer was suspended. It was entirely made up. The U.S. Olympic Committee told Reuters it was entirely a manufactured story with no basis in truth.

Example #2

CNN manufactured a story about Donald Trump being questioned by the Secret Service for comments made during a speech. The Secret Service told Reuters the entire story was completely false, it never happened. CNN made the entire story up. They didn’t get the story wrong – They made it up.

Example #3

CNN manufactures a completely false story about Milwaukee violence and attributes the exact opposite claims to the Victim’s Sister. CNN made it up. They didn’t get it wrong – They intentionally manufactured the spin.

Example #4

CNN manufactures a totally false claim of Donald Trump using a litmus test of “heritage” for possible Supreme Court Justices. The claim has no merit and is totally false. Donald Trump used a well known think tank called “The Heritage Foundation” for judicial vetting.

These examples of ridiculous media bias are all within the past week. Do you really think this same media outlet would not manipulate the same intent with their “polling”?

Think about it.

If you remove the “media narratives”… Factually, there is nothing to indicate Donald Trump was ever behind Hillary Clinton; and factually there is nothing to indicate Hillary Clinton even carries broad-based support.

Right now there is a ridiculous amount of media manipulation, optics and narratives, on display virtually daily.

The media might gnash their teeth about the lack of trust in their presentations, but how can CNN even protest such an opinion while their past weeks historical record of inaccuracy and bias speaks for itself.

Remember this tweet? “anti-ISIS” equals “radical new U.S. policy”.

ABC-Wasington Post = George Stephanopoulos and Jeff Bezos

CBS-New York Times = David Rhodes / Carlos Slim

CNN-ORC = Turner Broadcasting (Clinton News Network)

Fox News = Daron Shaw (Shaw Research and Associates) / Murdoch, Salmon

NBC/WSJ = Mark Murray (Pollster) and Rupert Murdoch.

Do you really think the same media outlets who produce this nonsense can present factual scientific data absent of manipulation amid the inputs and methodology?