A combative Defence Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Friday termed as “incomplete” and “distorted” the news item published by a newspaper about “parallel negotiations” by the PMO in the Rafale fighter deal and wondered whether “doubts” were being deliberated created in the minds of people because of some “corporate warfare”.

This hurts....very deeply....to devalue the lives of our courageous and selfless air warriors and nations defenders by linking it to monetary gain.... we have lost so many friends and such statements reopen wounds. Please respect and recognize sacrifices without talking money.

This is BEYOND vile. @RahulGandhi : Pilots, remember one thing: this 30,000 crore…could be given to you WHEN YOU DIE in a plane crash." Not for me to suggest but our brave pilots must ask this of themselves: Would you have this man lead you in a battle to defend India? pic.twitter.com/pRtRG3paHD

It is one thing to make a political point but people of eminence should be sensible to the sentiments of the martyrs, a lesson Rahul Gandhi forgot on Friday.

Reacting to the entire incident, Union Minister Smriti Irani took strong exception to Congress President's statement. Irani who has had several run-ins with Rahul Gandhi in the past said that such comment reveals Rahul Gandhi's thought process.

While the news report regarding Defence Secretary's note to then Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar dominated social media conversations on Friday, Rahul Gandhi's off the cuff remark about IAF martyrs touched a raw nerve on Twitter. As soon as the snippet from Congress President's press conference became viral on Twitter, it lead to many people outraging. A lot of people who have lost their near and dear ones to plane crashes also expressed reservations about Rahul Gandhi's churlish statement.

1. What did Rahul Gandhi say?

Rahul Gandhi while trying to appeal to IAF men regarding the alleged corruption in the Rafale scam said, "My friends in the Air Force, this Rs 30,000 crore could have been used for your safety. This Rs 30,000 crore could have been given to your families. This Rs 30,000 crore could be given to you, when you die in a plane crash. This is your money. This is your money, this is not the money of Anil Ambani.

2. Govt tackles Rahul's Rafale charge using Parrikar's reply

2/3

A combative Defence Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Friday termed as “incomplete” and “distorted” the news item published by a newspaper about “parallel negotiations” by the PMO in the Rafale fighter deal and wondered whether “doubts” were being deliberated created in the minds of people because of some “corporate warfare”.

Article an attempt to malign Rafale negotiations: Air Marshal SBP Sinha who negotiated deal

In an exclusive interview to ANI here, Sitharaman slammed Congress President Rahul Gandhi for constantly raising questions over the Rafale deal, equating him to a “parrot” and asked what “moral authority” he has to do so when he, along with his mother Sonia Gandhi and brother-in-law Robert Vadra are on bail. She asserted that it is the duty of the Prime Minister to monitor progress in any deal or project and if the PMO checks on these, it cannot be termed as “interference”.

How Rahul Gandhi's Rafale claims about PMO's 'parallel bargaining' were shot down

Referring to the news item which appeared in a newspaper on Friday, Sitharaman alleged that it was “half truth, with the intention ... to create doubt in the minds of the reader.”The minister questioned whether it was not the “responsibility” of the journalist to try to get complete details or get response from the ministry before publishing the item.Even if there was no response, an attempt could have been made, she added. She said that while publishing the file notings of an officer of the Defence Ministry, the journalist should have looked for the response of the Defence Minister “But what they have done in publishing the item is not a complete job,” Sitharaman said.

Revealed: Parrikar's response to Defence Secretary's comment on PMO 'parallel discussions' in Rafale negotiation

She said it was her “suspicion and I have reason to suspect” that publication of the news item was “an attempt by some people, either by doing themselves, or whether because of corporate warfare that is going on.”

Rejecting the contention about “interference” by the PMO, the Defence Minister said any PMO, not just under Narendra Modi, would “naturally monitor” the progress of any deal or even programmes like Ayushman Bharat.

“The Prime Minister is the first among equals (in a Cabinet) and if PMO checks on a ministry, it is not interference.... If the PMO is asking what is the status (of a project), it is not interference,” Sitharaman underlined.

She then went on to attack the Congress, questioning the role of National Advisory Council (NAC) headed by UPA Chairperson Sonia Gandhi when Manmohan Singh was the Prime Minister.“If this (PMO asking about progress of a project) is seen as interference, I ask the Congress, what was the NAC under Sonia Gandhi.... What was its role? They were not under PMO or Cabinet Secretariat?.. Did it have any statutory status.... It was remote-controlling the PM. Was it not interference?”

To a question, he equated Gandhi to a “parrot” which keeps repeating something and said “You can wake up someone who is sleeping but not someone who pretends to sleep.”Targeting Gandhi, she asked, “Why is he on bail? Why is his mother on bail? Why is his brother-in-law on bail? How has he moral authority to question the PM?”Referring to the Congress President’s press conference held this morning, Sitharaman said, “See how he is provoking the armed forces.... What was his language at the press conference. Nobody asked him what kind of language are you using? ... Are you provoking the armed forces?”

She said Modi monitors projects even at district level, earlier as Gujarat Chief Minister and now as Prime Minister.“Otherwise, you think progress could have been made at this speed, without corruption, without middlemen? ...He monitors and ensures implementation of decisions,” Sitharaman said.

Asked whether she, as Defence Minister, was worried as letters about Rafale deal were getting leaked.In response, she said, “I am not worried about Rafale or any other decision we have taken, because we have gone on merit... But through selective leaking, distorted versions, false impression is created.”