Soy vs. Soy: Max Boot and His Leftwing and Neocon Allies Declare War on a Newly-Discovered White Supremacist Organization: The National Review

How many times have we told them that you cannot join in the whitchunts for fringe, minor actors like Laura Loomer because the left doesn't care about Laura Loomer?

Laura Loomer is just proof of concept -- they want to prove the model of deplatforming people on the right.

You think they've developed this deplatforming machinery to take Laura Loomer out?

No, they developed it to take Ben Shapiro and Dennis Prager out. Laura Loomer was just the test-run.

This continues to elude the Smartest of the Smarty-Pants Smart Set

So, Rich Lowry declared that wenow deploy every available resource and tactic to "crush" white supremacy.

BTW, even the SPLC estimates there are only 5,000-8,000 members of the KKK, the premier, brand-name white supremacist organization in a country of one third of a billion people.

As Derek Hunter said in his bookand his great podcast: The total membership in the nation's top-tier white supremacist group is about the average crowd for a WNBA game.

This is the Growing Threat we must militarize the government to destroy?

Hey Beta Soyboy Cucks: You're being played again.

They don't want to arrest Joe Skinhead.

They want to arrest

When you publish an article that calls for a war on white supremacy, and the use of any tool to combat the imaginary threat, don�t be surprised when you become the hunted: https://t.co/Agl3yNYpH2 — Julie Kelly (@julie_kelly2) August 14, 2019





How much clearer can they make it? They're not even hiding it. If they were more subtle about it, they'd wait until they'd eradicated the low-hanging fruit of white supremacy before they turned their guns on thetargets here, non-white-supremacists the leftwing Maoists believe should no longer be permitted the rights of citizenship.

But they're not waiting.

And yet the Smartest of the Smarty-Pants Smart Set continues to employ the same "Eat Me Last, Fair-Minded Crocodile" strategy that has failed every time they've tried it.

The socialists keep trying socialism, no matter how many times it fails, and the Soyboy Beta Cucks continue trying to feed the leftwing crocodiles other bodies besides their own in the hope that one day, those crocodiles will finally stop being hungry.

That preamble out of the way, here is what's going on:



Max Boot, Fake Conservative at the Washington Post, wrote an article that white people should accept that they have privilege and then Check That Privilege.

Someone at National Review was actually permitted by Rich Lowry to dispute that, despite Rich Lowry's commitment to use every weapon at hand to fight the non-growing threat of White Supremacy.

A responsible journalist would propose a realistic alternative for conservative whites who don�t want to cede their basic political premises but who nevertheless reject white nationalism. But Boot instead goes on a meandering tirade with scant a coherent point. Sometimes he rails against white people as such; his claims range from the tautological (�White people can be pretty clueless�) to the plainly calumnious (� . . . the sense of outrage that white people feel when they fear losing their privileged position to people of color�). At other times, he aims his fire more narrowly on the �many� Trump supporters who assume �that white supremacy is the natural order of things.� Like most white authors in this genre, Boot�s self-hatred is boutique and performative. His ire is directed more at White People in the abstract than with white people as such. Boot (who, it must be said, is whiter than almost anyone on the Washington Post masthead) must, for his piece�s title to make any sense, be in possession of the �grip� he�d like his fellow whites to �get.� I�m not quite sure he is. The great shame of this piece is not that Boot had the audacity to instruct an entire racial group to �get a grip.� It is not even his almost libelous comparison of post-apartheid South Africa with the United States in 2019. It is the irresponsibility of speaking in such totalizing racial language in a time that, as he himself concedes, is �dangerous.� Max Boot can claim all he wants that President Trump is stoking the flames of race hatred, but if he really believes that, he ought to stop fanning them himself.

The reaction was entirely predictable, though the Smartest of the Smarty-Pants Smart Set once again failed to anticipate it.

Not anticipating very obvious next-steps proves how smart you are.

The obvious next step here -- which we've seen hundreds of times in the past, so I don't know why this Brain Trust didn't see it coming -- is to accuse anyone criticizing the extremist totalitarian War on White Supremacy of being a White Supremacist himself.

.@MaxBoot: "With its long-standing opposition to immigration...National Review has found common ground with the far right. Like many conservative media outlets, it has flirted with the �great replacement� theory espoused by the El Paso gunman." https://t.co/tmnJnPv8Oz — Evan McMullin (@EvanMcMullin) August 14, 2019

Max Boot: conservatives who don't agree with me are white supremacists.



NRO: White supremacists are evil, but Max should be more careful with his language.



MB: NRO is run by white supremacists.



NRO: Wait, what?



Anderson Cooper: How do NRO's attacks on you make you feel, Max? https://t.co/zDqZ9gQjwE — James Hasson (@JamesHasson20) August 14, 2019

This whole saga was the perfect litmus test for whether the Rubin/Nichols crowd cared about honesty or any principle other than "But Trump Bad," and they failed with flying colors. — James Hasson (@JamesHasson20) August 14, 2019



I mean... Really? You didn't know this was coming, National Review?

Why should anyone continue seeking your, ahem, wisdom?

Max Boot then decided to really explore the studio space and accuse Soyboy Beta Cuck Dan McLaughlin of also being a white supremacist.

This shocked and surprised Rich Lowry. Because smart people are always shocked and surprised that inevitable things which have always happened in the past continue happening in the present.

Now @maxboot is portraying this analysis by @baseballcrank as some sort of white nationalist screed�how completely dishonest and thoroughly pathetic



Why We Panic about Immigration https://t.co/CWnZsskoDx — Rich Lowry (@RichLowry) August 14, 2019





Oh, lol, you're right, my apologies. You wrote the El Paso terrorist's manifesto before he did. Any thoughts now that you've seen your philosophy in action?



Also I clearly know a hell of a lot more than you about political history, so I'm not sure what you're on about. — Jonathan M. Katz✍🏻 (@KatzOnEarth) August 14, 2019

My view is that when a terrorist uses the exact same shitty analysis as you to justify mass murder, you should take about twenty steps back and consider whether you have perhaps made some wrong turns. — Jonathan M. Katz✍🏻 (@KatzOnEarth) August 14, 2019

Good lord, you're like a human 8chan board.



First of all, I think it's absolutely wild that your crew doesn't understand the difference between someone futilely attacking people running a concentration camps and someone actually committing ethnic cleansing inside a Walmart. — Jonathan M. Katz✍🏻 (@KatzOnEarth) August 14, 2019

Second, the dire problem you're trying to whatabout is that you are part of a wave of white supremacist terror with deep roots in American history. The El Paso shooter wasn't just loosely affiliated with your political project. He was the leading edge of it. — Jonathan M. Katz✍🏻 (@KatzOnEarth) August 14, 2019





Dan McLaughlin, who wants you to know he's super-duper smart and that you should let him do your thinking for you, was then surprised that a leftwinger began calling him the inspiration for the El Paso shooter (really!):

I would ask, "Do you guys fucking evento get the game now?," but it's a stupid question.

Do they finally understand that what the left seeks from them is the cover of (weak) right-wing buy-in for their business model of Accuse, Isolate, Deplatform, then Destroy?

That they just want the right to keep endorsing this model over and over again until it becomes a normal mainstream feature of American public life? That we stop objecting to it all, and just begin shrugging, "Well, that's how it is now"?

Do they understand that once the weak soy right has given this attack model the "bipartisan" cover it needs to be accepted as an Eternal Sacred Pillar of Our Republic, it will be used immediately against its "rightwing" champions as well?

Do these stupid fuckers understood what the Jacobins did to each and every faction that joined them in their descent into blood and fury?

There is no wisdom in the second kick of the mule, nor the third, the fourth, the fifth, the sixth, the seventh, the eighth, the ninth, the tenth. Any of the hundred succeeding kicks, actually.

"The Expert" Tom Nichols of course came in to accuse National Review of cryptofascism:

For years, intellectual conservatives thought: "Look, we're smart, we're conservative, the liberals are just wrong." (Hell, I still feel that way most days.) But the intellectual cons who have surrendered to Trumpist populism are screwed and know it. /2 — Tom Nichols (@RadioFreeTom) August 13, 2019



Sure, they figured they could tough it out, get their judges, and then disavow Trump when he self-destructed. They partied with the rubes in hopes no one would notice the college degrees and the cufflinks. But Trump ate the movement before they could bail out. /4 — Tom Nichols (@RadioFreeTom) August 13, 2019



By the time this is over, all that'll be left is Gorka, Anton, and the last few editors of NR at CPAC trying to clap along gamely while someone explains how Q is going to swoop in and arrest the abortion-loving gays during their attempts to make stem cells into omelettes. /6x — Tom Nichols (@RadioFreeTom) August 13, 2019





Oh, and he attacked those Silly Christians and Stupid Pro-Lifers there at the end, too. What an unexpected little fillip.

Meanwhile, the Neocons (themselves liberal) and their openly-leftwing allies continue to insist, as Jonathan V. Last did, that Hillary Clinton was such a terrificallyand sensible and patriotic candidate the right should have beenabout voting for her:

Anton called 2016 the "Flight 93 Election"-- electing Trump might mean crashing the plane, but even that was better than certain catastrophe under Clinton.



It was unhinged but at least on its own terms it seemed like a one-time argument.



Not any more.https://t.co/5T5MoDAR34 — Jacob T. Levy (@jtlevy) August 13, 2019





That guy's at the Nikasen Center, which is pretty much just a welfare office for Neocons and NeverTrumpers (but I repeat myself).

Please do not start any conspiracy theories about NeverTrumpers being not-so-stealth liberals. I mean, don't notice that they also made the same argument about Merrrick Garland -- that Obama's last Supreme Court nominee, the man he chose to replace conservative legend Antonin Scalia, was such a moderate, sensible, and patriotic American that the right shamed itself by not leaping at the chance to confirm him.

Oh, this isn't strongly related, but it involves Max Boot.

Like the #SalonHot25 True Conservative AllahPundit, Max Boot is very, very angry about the abuse that the "one of the most respected journalists," Fredo Cuomo (!!!), is taking:

Appalling attack by the president on one of America�s most respected journalists�a fearless (and eminently sane) truth teller I am proud to work with at @cnn. We cannot accept as normal these kinds of attacks on the free press. https://t.co/7KsrrsKKUC — Max Boot (@MaxBoot) August 13, 2019





Luke Thompson notes:

Ever wondered why politics reduces to personal grievance for so many media elites? It�s because they�re fundamentally untalented goons fighting for paychecks they can�t actually justify except as matters of institutional inertia. — Luke Thompson (@ltthompso) August 13, 2019

Max was a dumb guy and a bad writer when he was on Team GOP. He�s a dumb guy and a bad writer now that he�s on Team CNN/WaPo. Nothing has changed except the uniform. He�s Jeff Francoeur, but for writing awful takes. — Luke Thompson (@ltthompso) August 13, 2019

I think they believe that they believe it. But they're capable of believing contrary things in short order without acknowledging the contradiction. — Luke Thompson (@ltthompso) August 13, 2019



And on that: NeverTrump "Republican" Ana Navarro praises Fredo Cuomo for his easy resort to violent threats:

Unsolicited Advice: If you�re gonna hurl an insult at someone, target a person whose bicep measurement is not more than your IQ.



Also, I fucking ❤️ @ChrisCuomo.



If you are offended by the expletive, kindly go clutch your pearls while you support Trump. https://t.co/sy8AWlCMbD — Ana Navarro-C�rdenas (@ananavarro) August 13, 2019





How bad is this Soy vs. Soy war?

It's so bad that evenis taking sides. And the right side, incredibly enough!

For of all of Max�s bellowing about the supposed white nationalists at @NRO, I don�t recall him giving up his CNN contract when they invited Richard Spencer to appear. — Jay Caruso (@JayCaruso) August 14, 2019





But then, the cucks are always ready to defend other cucks -- just never any actual conservatives.

One last brushfire skirmish in the Soy vs. Soy war:

A devastating critique from @charlescwcooke



How long before @MaxBoot accuses him of white supremacism???



Max Boot�s Dishonesty https://t.co/wylQkNTS8q — Rich Lowry (@RichLowry) August 14, 2019

You guys are having a meltdown. This attack is so shrill it discredits itself. Obviously I struck a nerve. If you think I libeled your writers by quoting what you published (my column: https://t.co/Nylc6u9cga), maybe you should rethink what you publish. https://t.co/a1ZD6eyF97 — Max Boot (@MaxBoot) August 14, 2019



Me: hey Max, did you even *read* my column before you claimed that it "flirted with the 'great replacement' theory espoused by the El Paso gunman"?



Max: LOL u mad bro?



Sad to see open trolling as the editorial standard of @washingtonpost:https://t.co/7h7wAUyzWG — Dan McLaughlin (@baseballcrank) August 14, 2019





Do you think now that Baseball Cuck has noticed that the left's/NeverTrumper's attacks onare made in bad faith he will extend that same understanding to those similarly accused by this claque?

No, of course not.

Like Obama, he's just too smart and too fundamentally good for the common people (racist deplorables) to see him as smart and fundamentally good.

He's too smart to make obvious connections, and he's too brave to exhibit any courage, and he's too virtuous to dispute slander directed at someone else.

I'd literally die of shock if any of these mewling cowards every stood up against the left's degredation and deplatforming efforts who wasn't part of their own squalid club.

It goes too far to accuse this crew of being Nazis.

But I think it's fair to analogize them to Kapos.

They're the prisoners of the same vicious totalitarians that we are -- but they... do favors for those vicious totalitarians and punish the people the totalitarians want punished.

They help the Nazis, they support the Nazis' attacks, and they get special privileges in exchange for their help.

Until, at least, the Nazis decide that the Kapos need some correcting as well.

Metaphor?

Via LGoPs.