Andrew Anglin

Daily Stormer

October 9, 2015

Yesterday, I wrote an article examining the demographics problems in White countries, arguing that the real problem is immigration and the non-White birthrate, not our own birthrate,

The Jews are using the excuse of our own low birthrate to excuse non-White immigration, when in actual fact, a smaller population is not a problem, especially due to automation and other technological developments.

What I did not include was graphs for projected White population numbers, because these don’t exist (at least not that I can find). The only data which exists is projected national population numbers, and these include the non-Whites which are already here and breeding, as well as sometimes factoring in immigration, and as such were not useful for my purposes.

However, here’s a graph that is useful for my purposes.

Japan is easy enough to look at, as it is nearly 100% Japanese presently, and has no plans to bring in thousands or millions of non-Japanese.

This data from the Japanese government shows the 2095 population being equal to that of 1935 (68 million). Granted, the population will be older, on average, than it was in 1935, but it will still be double what it was in 1875.

One of Germany’s core excuses for the invasion of “migrants” is that they need more people due to the birthrate. This is even while 5 million German nationals are unemployed.

CBS News:

The German government has argued that the migrants will provide a much needed work force to offset the needs of an aging population, but not all Germans are buying it. “That’s what they’re selling us these people for, that they will pay our pensions in the future,” an upset German named Gregor said. “We have 5 million unemployed Germans! They can’t even put their own people into jobs.” With more migrants arriving daily, Germany’s generosity is being stretched to the limits.

It is pure nonsense that our countries are going to stop dropping because of the population drop. We still have, on the whole, bigger White populations than at any time in history. The fact that the people are getting older is inconsequential.

Are the millions of unemployed people in our countries refusing to work at hospitals and nursing homes? What does there being a lot of old people have to do with anything at all?

They then try and claim that we need to pay the pensions of the old people, but assuming the birthrate has plateaued, which it seemingly has, only one generation would have to work to pay these pensions, and the money currently being expended on “migrants” could be used for that purpose. This is aside from the now constantly talked about fact that automation is putting people out of work – for the obvious reason that it is bringing a greater output of production for a lower level of human work input. This, in turn, means that less work input is needed to provide for the material needs of the aging.

The only economic consequence of a smaller population is a smaller GDP, and that is in no way correlated to individual wellbeing or even individual wealth. It is solely correlated to the zeros on the bank account of some Jew banker.

This is all aside from the fact that brown people aren’t generally known for their work ethnic, and tend to suck resources from White countries, rather than create them.

A Separate Issue

As I said in yesterday’s article, this issue should not be confused with the general human value of family. Family is what makes human beings truly happy, and repairing the family unit should remain a goal of those fighting against Jewish social imperialism.

Related: Please Inform All Brown Women of These Facts, Make Certain White Women Don’t Know

But that is a side issue from actual numbers, and the idea that our countries cannot function with 20th or even 19th century population levels. Our countries were fully functioning in both the 20th and 19th centuries.

Another Separate Issue

This then gets tied up with the group in White Nationalist circles which claims the most important thing White people must do is have families. This is some strange neo-Maoist ideology, apparently, which I am failing to grasp. The thing which is most important for the White race is to stop the invasion.

Of course, for individual human happiness, a family is the way to go, and that should be encouraged. But I often see a scolding of young men for not having families, when the reality is that it is very difficult to build a family at this point in time, due both to economic pressures and feminism.

I fear that many of these people are not simply missing the math, but are engaging in normal boomber lecturing that all boomers engage in against the generation they created.

A meme image posted in the comments section of yesterday’s article read:

Boomers: Deplete all of the resources of most of the countries on the planet in a single generation, leaving absolutely nothing for future generations, pollute the planet to the point where some areas will become unable to support life and leave the clanup to future generations. Support radical feminism and multiculturalism to the point where your sons and daughters will be unable to find wives and keep families, and your entire race may be in danger of extinction. Export all of the industry and farming work overseas for short-term profit, destroying future generations’ chances of finding work and having a stable economy. Destroy the educational and academic institutions in innumerable social and political experiments that cripple at least two generations. Promote the kind of banking and economics that have put the most powerful country on Earth into the most debt ever seen in human history and cause massive economic recessions that affect the entire world. Finally, create a social institution that redistributes wealth to your generation from your own children in outrageous retirement and pension funds designed to allow you to live in luxury and comfort while the world you have ruined melts down around you. “Kids these days are lazy, they don’t want jobs and families, they just sit at home!”

Not even saying here that every boomer is bad or guilty, or that Jews weren’t ultimately responsible. Just that they aren’t in a position to lecture.

Most of the site’s readers are millennials (born between 1982 and the early 2000s).

We are probably all hearing, or have heard (or for those still under 18, will hear), similar things from our parents, and we don’t need to hear it on White nationalist websites.

Because we’ve heard it already. Probably, we’ve heard it a lot.

I am 31, and would love to have a family and so on. But I don’t have any money (part of that is having chosen to run this site instead of start a business, but it is nonetheless a common problem – nearly universal, in fact), and I certainly would be very wary to marry an American (or otherwise Western) woman, seeing the way other men are getting completely screwed by the Jew-feminist system which has actually incentivized “no-fault” divorce (first legalized in 1969 in California by boomer favorite Ronald Regan) for women.

I would also not be interested in a girl who was fat/unattractive or over the age of 25 (honestly, I wouldn’t really be interested in girls over the age of 20, for the mere reason that after that they are so psychologically damaged that they don’t really have much use; they are also going to be less fertile, energetic and physically attractive than a younger woman), and most girls in that age range are brainwashed by the feminist “go to college and get a career” concepts, and most attractive women generally are obsessed with the idea of unlimited male attention and not interested in serious relationships.

The natural hypergonamous nature of women has been released, and they desire, while they are still attractive, to seek unlimited partners in the quest for the perfect partner.

As F. Roger Devlin writes in Sexual Utopia in Power: The Feminist Revolt Against Civilization (emphasis mine):

Women know their own sexual urges are unruly, but traditionally have had enough sense to keep quiet about it. A husband’s belief that his wife is naturally monogamous makes for his own peace of mind. It is not to a wife’s advantage, either, that her husband understand her too well: Knowledge is power. In short, we have here a kind of Platonic “noble lie”—a belief which is salutary, although false. It would be more accurate to say that the female sexual instinct is hypergamous. Men may have a tendency to seek sexual variety, but women have simple tastes in the manner of Oscar Wilde: They are always satisfied with the best. By definition, only one man can be the best. These different male and female “sexual orientations” are clearly seen among the lower primates, e.g., in a baboon pack. Females compete to mate at the top, males to get to the top. Women, in fact, have a distinctive sexual utopia corresponding to their hypergamous instincts. In its purely utopian form, it has two parts: First, she mates with her incubus, the imaginary perfect man; and, second, he “commits,” or ceases mating with all other women. This is the formula of much pulp romance fiction. The fantasy is strictly utopian, partly because no perfect man exists, but partly also because even if he did, it is logically impossible for him to be the exclusive mate of all the women who desire him.

The situation then, given the free sex culture, is that a woman will entertain as many men as she desires, searching for “the one” who can meet her fantasy standards of being the perfect Alpha Male.

Of course, the free sex culture also gives men the ability to be one of the entertained, but that ultimately ends up being a rather small consolation, and not something I would want to watch recurring forever.

The infinite loop of casual partners gets old, boring and depressing by your mid-twenties, for those who aren’t old enough to have experienced that part yet.

And now, even casual sex is being stripped of most men, as Tinder (linked that for our boomer readers who are confused as to how badly they have screwed us over) and other electronic methods allow women to easily select the very most attractive available men from a much wider pool – being the best she can find in class or at the bar or in her social circle is no longer good enough.

She is now not choosing from a social circle, but from a circular radius of miles for her casual partners (one of which will inevitably turn out to be the greatest man who ever existed who also wants to suspend sex with all other women just for her – even though as the perfect man he is able to choose from all women on earth, he will of course choose her because she is the princess – seriously you guys, you need to wake up and realize women think like children in a lot of pretty important areas, especially before they are 28 or so and their biological clock begins ticking rapidly).

Seriously

Realistically, young men in the West should focus on money and their own personal goals first, as well as the goals of our movement, before thinking seriously about women or kids. Or move to a country such as Russia or some other Eastern European (or even South American) country where you can probably get an English-teaching job pretty easily (and will have lower economic pressure generally), and marry there (your wife can still be a dumb bitch and leave you, of course, but she can’t take all your money with her which makes her much less likely to do so). Though that has a whole other load of cultural problems with it.

We’re all dealing with these issues, and it isn’t our fault. It isn’t even technically our parents fault, but the fault of ratlike parasite Jews (but our parents, not us, are the ones who sold us down this filthy brown-water river of kikery).

I will note here that I’ve really been liking the stuff Return of Kings has been publishing lately on these issues, and recommend it to anyone dealing with them.

Bottom Line

Demographic collapse is not an issue of you having kids. It is an issue of immigration. Even by current projections (which are not based on us stopping these kikes – which we are going to do, by the way), the worst our own populations will suffer over the next century is a return to early 20th century population levels, a point at which our societies were generally stable.

So don’t let yourself get psychologically bullied by some whining boomer for not having started a family yet (whether it be your parents/elders or on a White nationalist website).

Soon enough, we are going to stop these kikes, and reinstall a patriarchy, which will ensure not only to an end to feminism, but also an end to the economic problems which are inhibiting men from building and ruling over healthy, wealthy and large families.