A normally reliable source has furnished me a copy of a letter from the Principal of Friends Seminary (or FS) in New York City, announcing that “In late January we will welcome Ben Frisch back into the classroom.” (I called FS to ask about it; as of this writing, there was no response.) The full text of the letter is below.

If you don’t know, Ben Frisch is the Quaker teacher at Friends Seminary (“the”, as in THE only Quaker teacher almost a year ago, when this story began), who was abruptly fired last March.

He got the boot after making a clumsy joke in a geometry class about how his raised arm, illustrating an obtuse angle, was like a “Heil Hitler” salute.

Frisch is about as far from being “Nazi friendly” as you could want. Although he’s a longtime Quaker, his ancestors were European and Jewish, and some were lost in the Holocaust. He doesn’t need a “diversity officer” to brief him on all that. Nevertheless, he was canned within a couple weeks. In a letter to students, the principal, Bo Lauter, wrote, “Our students know that words and signs of hate and fear have no place at Friends . . . .”

But in fact there was much more diversity of view at FS about whether Frisch’s obtuse angle quip constituted “words and signs of hate.” Frisch’s firing set off a firestorm: petitions on his behalf were signed by hundreds of students, and hundreds of alumni (after all, he had taught at FS for 34 years without any complaints; he knew lots of alumni). There was even a sit-in.

The incident also caught the attention of some big outside media. The New York Times ran a substantial article about the case in February, then followed up on the tumultuous aftermath with a long cover article in the “Education Issue” of its weekly magazine in September.

In fact, some militant critics, mainly parents, called the joke “inexcusably offensive,” One mom told the Times of Israel that “I would have been gravely disappointed if the school had kept him, and would have been extremely unhappy and uncomfortable to have my child in that classroom next year.”

Yet a columnist for the same paper retorted that “At the same time an adherence to the values of forgiveness and restorative justice that institutions like Friends promote would seem to demand a path — reprimand, rehabilitation — other than firing someone who made people uncomfortable.”

One FS graduate, Emily Kelton Owens, was even more eloquent, in a commentary published by the New York Daily News:

“I graduated from Friends Seminary in 1995. I have been absorbing the coverage around the school’s termination of teacher Ben Frisch over an impromptu, insensitive joke in which he said “Heil Hitler” to his class.

While the joke was in poor taste, I am more concerned by Friends’ reaction. Their decision to dismiss Frisch contradicts the school that I loved and helped to raise me from ages 6 to 17.

Frisch, a widely respected member of the Friends faculty, dedicated his 34-year career to educating and bettering the lives of his students rather than pursuing a Ph.D. in geochemistry. There was no kinder or less intimidating teacher than Ben Frisch.

It has been reported that Friends’ principal fired Frisch as part of his pledge to make “students feel safe.” . . .

Friends made me feel safe not by shielding me from uncomfortable situations, but by giving me the tools to navigate through them and by teaching me compassion to address hard situations in a mature manner.

Two aspects of my Friends education have stayed close to my heart 23 years after graduating: First, students had a voice. In keeping with the school’s Quaker heritage, each day of high school started with a meeting for worship, business, or announcements, all of which provided platforms for students to speak their minds or often to lead the conversations. . . .

How, as was reported, did the principal “not consider the ‘Heil Hitler episode’ a close call” when two-thirds of the high school’s student body forgave and even signed a petition urging the school not to terminate Frisch? . . .

I am now a mother of two and am fortunate enough, in large part, due to my Friends education, to be raising children in a small, paradisiacal town in Southern California where the biggest excitement revolves around little league games. . . . While I wish [my children] a generally conflict-free childhood, my personal experience at Friends taught me that it’s navigating my way through uncomfortable situations that empowers me to face adversity and hopefully make compassionate decisions.

There were many ways the school could have made Frisch’s mistake a teachable moment. They could have taught forgiveness of a beloved, kind teacher who was better than his worst day of a 34-year career.

With the approach of Yom Kippur, which signifies a time of forgiveness and new beginnings, I wonder why, if I, a Jew who received a Quaker education from first grade through college, can forgive Ben Frisch, Friends’ administration was unable to do so.

All very well, but the administration wasn’t having it.

Fortunately for Frisch, he was more than simply a nice-guy Quaker teacher with a long, clean record. In addition to the student/faculty petitions which garnered 700 signatures for him, he’s also a union activist.

Yes. FS teachers have a union. And the union sprang into action.

Frisch’s firing ended up before a labor arbitrator, who held a hearing in midsummer.

Meantime, press reaction continued. In The Federalist, a rightwing blogger wrung his hands and declared “We Need A New Counterculture To Combat The Left’s Circular Firing Brigades.” (He was almost right; but in my view the “Counterculture” whose relevance was demonstrated here was an OLD one, that’s usually spelled solidarity, or UNIONS for short.

Without that union clout, odds are Ben Frisch would now be just one more ex-something-or-other, driving for Uber and nursing old grudges.

On October 28, the arbitrator ruled. “While I don’t believe there is a scintilla of evidence Frisch is a Nazi sympathizer, or is in any way anti-Semitic,” the ruling began, “the fact remains Frisch’s behavior was inappropriate.”

Even Frisch agreed with that; he had apologized at the time, and later as well. But, the arbitrator also ruled that with his long clean record, one dumb joke didn’t justify the bum’s rush he got, and ordered his reinstatement.

It wasn’t a total victory: the arbitrator denied his request for back pay, saying the loss of a semester’s compensation was a justifiable suspension.

But now, it appears, Frisch has been vindicated. As the Principal’s letter delicately put it:

In late January we will welcome Ben Frisch back into the classroom. Everyone agrees that his reintegration has required a thoughtful process, and it has involved him. We understand and appreciate that through this period we have shared little information, which may have contributed to some anxiety across the community, especially among those at some distance. Throughout the time, however, essential work has been underway. We appreciate Ben’s understanding and cooperation with the time the School has needed to develop his teaching schedule and respond to the concerns and wishes of faculty, administrative staff and Upper School students. Ben has given the School time to prepare for his return so those students who will experience a teacher change will do so at a natural semester break point.

You ask me, this “thoughtful process” translates mostly as an admission that the Principal and those who pushed for firing Frisch needed some time to eat crow and try to save face. (Compare this outcome to that last spring at Friends Central School in Philadelphia, where two teachers were suspended and then summarily fired almost at the same time, for the “offense” of inviting a distinguished Palestinian Quaker scholar to speak at a reputedly “Quaker” school. Their only recourse was a lawsuit, still pending, and their careers in “Quaker education” are done. (Links to our coverage of that case can be found here. )

Two footnotes to this story:

One: Quaker schools, even those with a long history, sky-high tuitions and many weighty alums, can face damaging public scrutiny despite their “private” status. Any Principal or headmaster (who also has to double as chief fundraiser), should have nightmares about having a personnel decision draw public second-guessing attention from the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the NY Daily News, the Times of Israel & others.

Two: For all the highfaultin talk about “Quaker values”, I hope that students and teachers at FS and other Quaker schools will not miss the most important “teachable moment” of this affair, which is the fact that it was the presence of a labor union that made this outcome possible. The petitions were good, the letters were good. But don’t kid yourselves: Despite all the “policy handbook” palaver about participation, sensitivity, consensus and yada yada, it was the fact and power of organized solidarity that made it possible to hold the FS school power structure accountable. That’s what saved Ben Frisch’s career and reputation.

Any other conclusion would be, to say the least, obtuse.

If you find this post of value, please pass it on.