What if an unknown researcher predicts an earthquake using a disfavored technique? If an earthquake then happens and hundreds die, should naysayer scientists go to jail? Some in the city of L'Aquila, Italy answered that odd question with a resounding yes. An April 6, 2009 earthquake that was predicted by Giampaolo Giuliani killed 308 people. Now the city's prosecutors are considering charging seven researchers at the National Geophysics and Vulcanology Institute (INGV) and members of the city's Major Risks Committee with manslaughter. The prosecutors say the committee could be considered criminally negligent for telling the townspeople that there was no need to evacuate. A formal investigation has been opened, but charges haven't yet been filed. As reported in Life in Italy:

"Those involved were highly qualified individuals who should have provided the public with different answers," said L'Aquila's chief prosecutor, Alfredo Rossini. "It was not the case that we received no warning, because there had already been tremors. However, the advice given was that there was no need for people to leave their homes".

Giuliani, the man who predicted the quake, works at the National Laboratories at Gran Sasso, though he has been misreported in both Italian and American media outlets as a physicist, seismologist, and a collaborator with the National Institute of Nuclear Physics. According to Science Insider, Giuliani's work on earthquakes is a "hobby" and seismologists do not use the radon tests he cited, since statistically they have failed to accurately predict quakes. Related content: 80beats: Scientist Smackdown: Did a Seismologist Accurately Predict the Italian Quake? 80beats: Toads—Yes, Toads—May Know When an Earthquake Is Coming 80beats: Science Via Twitter: Post-Earthquake Tweets Can Provide Seismic Data Bad Astronomy: Do rainbow clouds foretell earthquakes?Image: United States Geological Survey