



I don't think it's traitorous to labor to have produced the easy to understand explanation of how labor has been affected, regardless of his role under Clinton.



To do nothing from the point of that frustration would have been traitorous. Your blistering over his SOL role leave out anything he's done or tried to do (example, this movie, which I don't have to go to a theater to see, as I did to see "Inconvenient Truth" is evidence of how his role is one of benefit now.



It's easy to criticize and it's very hard to do. I know this at the local level and from what history teaches me about others like RR. I don't, which is why I don't think anything put forth by him since that administration was "pretending".I don't think it's traitorous to labor to have produced the easy to understand explanation of how labor has been affected, regardless of his role under Clinton.To do nothing from the point of that frustration would have been traitorous. Your blistering over his SOL role leave out anything he's done or tried to do (example, this movie, which I don't have to go to a theater to see, as I did to see "Inconvenient Truth"is evidence of how his role is one of benefit now.It's easy to criticize and it's very hard to do. I know this at the local level and from what history teaches me about others like RR.