Wrong. There is no mention whatsoever of mud in the investigation submitted by the police, which includes opinions by medical experts as well. They however do mention clay in their investigation.

The chargesheet reads: “The investigation has established, on the strength of evidence both oral as well as scientific, that the accused SI Dutta and Tilak Raj have in furtherance of Criminal Conspiracy hatched between themselves and the principal accused Sanji Ram washed the clothes worn by the deceased at the time of her death with the intention to remove the clay and blood stains/sperms etc and thereafter forwarded the same to FSL (forensic science laboratory) for expert opinion.”

Coming back to ShankNaad’s assertion.

1. The first part of the statement – "The girl's body had mud deposits which did not belong to the area"

The chargesheet doesn't say that the clay found on her was not of the kind found in the area, it only states that police officials conspired with Sanji Ram to ensure the clothes were not sent in their authentic state for testing.

2. The second part of the statement – “which suggests that she was murdered somewhere else and her body was thrown in the temple premises"

The assertion that she was murdered somewhere else and her body was thrown in the temple premises is baseless. The body was found in the Rasanna forest and not in the temple.