The cryptocurrency-centric online gambling world shuddered under the recent announcement that the Justice Department (DoJ) would apply the 1961 Wire Act to all online gambling.

Previously, the Act was understood only to apply to online interstate sports betting based on a 2011 ruling. The new application of the law will likely put at least a temporary halt on all online gambling — due to the difficulty in guaranteeing only intrastate betting takes place.

Out with the old

The surprising announcement came through a 23-page opinion from the DoJ legal team detailing that the previous 2011 decision was a misinterpretation of the law. That ruling had indicated that, while the transfer of funds would be a violation of the law, the transfer of data would not be based on a simultaneous reading of the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA).

Taken together, these two statutes could be read to prohibit interstate gambling, but not internet gambling, where simple data is sent across state lines. This opinion almost immediately led to a huge increase in the amount of online gambling — both by established companies and by startups, including cryptocurrency companies.

In with the new

Nevertheless, the DoJ criminal division now argues that the law should apply to all betting in order to limit the movement of funds or data across state lines. Rather than simply sports betting, this new opinion will make all internet gambling illegal by falling within the purview of the original 1961 law — effectively overturning the 2011 interpretation.

The opinion would not limit physical gambling within states, whether on sports or in other areas. However, because tracing the movement of data and funds would be prohibitively difficult, it would effectively halt any such activity online.

The cryptocurrency online gambling market had surged in recent years because blockchain technology offers trustless interactions between players without the costly expense of a third party to manage transactions. In a nutshell, it offers the perfect framework for online betting.

No wonder, then, that the industry had begun to grow. The initial coin offering (ICO) craze through 2017 and part of 2018 had led observers to begin to hope that online gambling would become one of the most robust use-cases for cryptocurrency in the marketplace. The potential for huge revenue streams and an already-growing market seemed to be the perfect storm.

However, these hopes appear to be dashed with the recent opinion. In spite of suggestions that this new interpretation may be challenged legally, companies will certainly be forced to carefully evaluate what type of gambling they’re offering. It appears at the moment that the opinion may completely halt all such activities indefinitely.

One silver lining exists, however. Because this ruling affects a number of large financial institutions, it is likely that the legal case would be carried on by those with deeper pockets than most ICOs.

Think online crypto gambling is dead? Or will the opinion be reversed? Let us know in the comments below!