Continuing with current practice of attempting to use immunity against numerous lawsuits and investigations, Donald Trump has again asked a judge to halt a lawsuit leveled against him by a former contestant on The Apprentice, who cites numerous allegations of inappropriate contact by Trump.

The immunity claim came in a filing by Trump’s attorney Marc Kasowitz, who is also acting as his defense in ongoing investigations about Trump’s possible ties to Russia during the campaign. Kasowitz wrote that Summer Zervos’s suit is a “private witch hunt” whose sole purpose is to deal political damage to the president, per Politico.

“Ms. Zervos and her counsel have openly conceded—indeed, bragged—that their true motivation is to use this action for political purposes as a pretext to obtain broad discovery that they hoped could be used in impeachment hearings to distract from the President’s agenda,” Kasowitz wrote in the motion filed on Friday night with New York Supreme Court Judge Jennifer Schecter.

“This action should be dismissed without prejudice to Ms. Zervos refiling after the President completes his presidency because this State Court does not have jurisdiction to hear a civil action against a sitting President,” the motion continues. “This Court lacks the authority pursuant to the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution to exercise jurisdiction in this case because a state court cannot control President Trump—who uniquely embodies the Executive Branch—or interfere with his ability to perform his duties . . .”

However, the Supreme Court ruled in Clinton v. Jones, a 1997 case involving then-president Bill Clinton and former Arkansas state employee Paula Jones, that the president is not immune from court proceedings while he is in office.

Zervos and her attorneys have filed a defamation suit, claiming that Trump damaged her reputation by denying her claims and calling her a liar. She’s demanding about $3,000 in damages. Zervos’s attorneys also noted in a filing in April that Trump does not have any claims towards immunity, because the incidents occurred long before he took office.

“Precisely because Defendant’s underlying tortious behavior has nothing to do with his current duties or office, and because it occurred before he took that office, he does not have immunity from suit,” Zervos’s attorneys wrote. “No person is above the law in this country and that includes the President of the United States.”