Get the latest BPR news delivered free to your inbox daily. SIGN UP HERE.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s plans to reopen California has some critics crying foul again over what they feel is his and other officials’ continued religious discrimination.

During a briefing Tuesday, the governor laid out a four-stage plan for reopening the state that calls for reopening potentially crowded schools, childcare facilities, retail businesses and offices in “weeks, not months” — but that conversely calls for delaying the reopening of churches for “months, not weeks.”

This did not sit well with critics.

Look:

California governor @GavinNewsom announced today that he will reopen schools, daycare, retail, and other facilities within “weeks, not months” but will keep churches closed for “months, not weeks.” Faithful Californians should defy him.https://t.co/ZnheEYyISc — Tara Reade Is More Credible Than Christine Ford (@michaeljknowles) April 29, 2020

If it is safe enough to open schools, it is safe enough to open churches. This is clear bigotry. #California #PoliceState — Random Stranger (@crystlgib) April 29, 2020

Not simply bigotry (which it is). Open defiance of the clear text of the constitution, a document I presume that even the governor of California promised to uphold. — John Hasley (@PonsSublicius) April 29, 2020

This seems impossible to believe! Is this for real? This should be challenged in court if true — Morgan Sayre (@MorganSayre2) April 29, 2020

Schools before churches. Gavin you missed the class on the Constitution. Religious freedom first. Praying for your enlightenment. Disgusted at your lack of aware. — MiddleLost (@MiddleLost1) April 29, 2020

I hope every Christian in CA takes note of what happens when you vote for a democrat. Learn your lesson, people: democrats hate God, therefore they hate YOU! — Alexis Amezquita (@AlexisAmezqui11) April 29, 2020

Christians need to stand up to this governor!!! pic.twitter.com/IsCevdURYq — Karon Alexander (@karoncu82) April 29, 2020

According to the governor’s team, the first four types of business/entities are allegedly “lower risk workplaces” that’ll be included in stage two of the reopening process.

“So stage two will be a focus on those lower risk workplaces. So the goal here will be creating opportunities for lower risk sectors to adopt and reopen,” California Department of Public Health director Sonia Angell said.

“And when I talk about lower risk sectors, which I’ll go into a little more detail later, we’re talking about things like manufacturing that may not have been a part of the essential sectors that are currently opening. We also in stage two, we’ll be talking about modifying our school programs and including childcare reopening.”

However, for reasons that remain unclear, the governor’s team has classified churches as “higher risk workplaces” and thus relegated them to stage three, along with gyms, hair salons and nail salons.

“The final two stages that we discussed are stage three and stage four. Stage three is the space that we get into when we’re talking about higher risk workplaces,” Angell continued.

“So these include places like personal haircare places, entertainment venues where people are sitting closer together and sporting events without live audiences. Other things that fall into this space are in-person religious services like churches and weddings.”

Listen to the full presser below:

“The third phase is personal care,” the governor himself explained. “It’s the areas around, well a lot of discussion around gyms and spas, and nail salons, and people wanting to get haircuts. All of us. Those would fall into the third phase category.”

But religious services aren’t really a form of “personal care.” They’re a type of worship protected by the U.S. Constitution.

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances,” the First Amendment explicitly reads.

Newsom later added: “But the foundational point of emphasis we want to advance today is phase two as was presented by Dr. Angell is in weeks, not months. Phase three and four, months, not weeks.”

This decision to relegate churches to stage three may inspire another slew of lawsuits against Newsom and his administration officials.

One suit filed earlier this month by three pastors and one parishioner targets Newsom and other local/state officials over a “stay-at-home” order that the churches argue violates their First Amendment right to freedom of religion and assembly, especially in light of the waivers being granted to “favored businesses.”

“The state and localities have granted sweeping exceptions to the shutdown orders for favored businesses and professions, while specifically targeting people of faith and decreeing to religious institutions that it is ‘good enough’ that they be allowed to offer streaming video services,” their attorney, Center for American Liberty CEO Harmeet Dhillon, reportedly said in a statement.

“The state does not get to dictate the method of worship to the faithful. If a Californian is able to go to Costco or the local marijuana shop or liquor store and buy goods in a responsible, socially distanced manner, then he or she must be allowed to practice their faith using the same precautions.”

The @Liberty_Ctr filed for a TRO in our suit against California and local officials for discriminating against religious institutions. State ban assigns faith to a 2d class status, below WalMart, pot stores, laundromats, alcohol stores, & other loopholes https://t.co/gCzB88KheF — Harmeet K. Dhillon (@pnjaban) April 15, 2020

Another suit was filed this week by a San Joaquin County evangelical church upset over having to stop Sunday services because of Newsom’s strict “stay-at-home” orders.

“Our civil rights are not suspended by a virus,” Cross Culture Christian Center’s attorney Dean R. Broyles, reportedly said in a statement.

“For millions of Californians, their religious faith is truly ‘essential’ like the air we breathe, the water we drink and the food we eat. That’s why religious liberty is one of our ‘first freedoms’ recognized by the First Amendment in the Bill of Rights.”

Indeed.