Authored by: AntiFUD on Tuesday, March 26 2013 @ 04:38 PM EDT

Is it SCO's birthday or something?



10 year-old cases shouldn't be allowed to play in Federal Courts without posting

a bond of Beeelions.



---

IANAL - Free to Fight FUD - "to this very day"

[ Reply to This | # ]



Authored by: JamesK on Tuesday, March 26 2013 @ 04:49 PM EDT

Geez... Someone must have shares in a popcorn company. ;-)





---

The following program contains immature subject matter.

Viewer discretion is advised. [ Reply to This | # ]



Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, March 26 2013 @ 04:59 PM EDT

Judge Kimball - original Judge Campbell Judge Waddoups Judge Sam Judge Benson Judge Nuffer That's a lotta Judges to be going through. If the wikkipedia article is correct. There's only three Judges left to pick up the baton: Jenkins Shelby Stewart Not much time left for SCOg before some Judge will have to respond to them :) RAS [ Reply to This | # ]



Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, March 26 2013 @ 05:06 PM EDT

And just after they finished shredding those "old business"

documents too... but I don't imagine THAT would have anything to do with their

renewed bravado. [ Reply to This | # ]



Authored by: darkonc on Tuesday, March 26 2013 @ 05:37 PM EDT

Place off topic posts here...



---

Powerful, committed communication. Touching the jewel within each person and

bringing it to life.. [ Reply to This | # ]



Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, March 26 2013 @ 05:59 PM EDT

On the one hand, I am amused to see SCO twisting slowly in the wind, approaching

the inevitable Chapter 7, running out of money to even pay lawyers to appear in

court for them. In fact, I kind of view this farce as a game of chicken between

the District Court in Utah and the Bankruptcy Court in Delaware: "You want

us to revisit that pile of rubbish? You won't declare Chapter 7 like any sane

court would do? Well, don't think we're going to waste our time hearing it. We

can stall longer than SCO will have money."



On the other hand, SCO really does have a point. A year and a half to even get

a motion heard on whether they can reopen the case? That seems unreasonably

slow, even by the pace of District Court actions. (Which makes it seem like the

District Court is in fact deliberately stalling - maybe I'm not just being

cynical in the previous paragraph. The only other possibility is that SCO has

had a really bad streak of luck with respect to judge availability. Couldn't

happen to a more deserving group.)



MSS2 [ Reply to This | # ]



Authored by: darkonc on Tuesday, March 26 2013 @ 06:35 PM EDT

Here is where we ignore SCO and talk about the rest of the

world.



---

Powerful, committed communication. Touching the jewel within each person and

bringing it to life.. [ Reply to This | # ]



Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, March 26 2013 @ 06:44 PM EDT

Who is still left at SCO? Anybody, anybody? [ Reply to This | # ]



Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, March 26 2013 @ 06:47 PM EDT

Until this moment I never believed in zombies. [ Reply to This | # ]



Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, March 26 2013 @ 07:26 PM EDT

That probably explains the endless recusals.

DIE SCO DIE !

[ Reply to This | # ]



Authored by: BJ on Tuesday, March 26 2013 @ 07:28 PM EDT

... to SCO's recent destruction of its business

records will have to do without my outrage in

this.

Sorry. There's only 25 hours in a day.



bjd





[ Reply to This | # ]



Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, March 26 2013 @ 07:38 PM EDT

This is the lawsuit that never ends,

it goes on and on my friends.

Someone started it not knowing what it was,

And now it goes on and on because...



[repeat ad nauseum] [ Reply to This | # ]



Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, March 26 2013 @ 08:19 PM EDT

With the incriminating evidence shredded, it's time for one more try. [ Reply to This | # ]



Authored by: AH1 on Tuesday, March 26 2013 @ 08:59 PM EDT

I am actually surprised that the request didn't include the words "Make

them come back so I can bite their legs off." In reality that seems to be

all that is left of TSG. [ Reply to This | # ]



Authored by: OpenSourceFTW on Wednesday, March 27 2013 @ 01:40 AM EDT

Can we bring back tarring and feathering just once? I'd be happy to contribute

some tar. They can supply the feathers from their flock of "flying"

pigs.



Then they need to be run out of town on a rail. [ Reply to This | # ]



Authored by: SilverWave on Wednesday, March 27 2013 @ 04:10 AM EDT

.



---

RMS: The 4 Freedoms

0 run the program for any purpose

1 study the source code and change it

2 make copies and distribute them

3 publish modified versions



[ Reply to This | # ]



Boies Schiller etc apparently - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, March 28 2013 @ 08:37 AM EDT

Authored by: kh on Wednesday, March 27 2013 @ 04:17 AM EDT

What relationship to the old SCO are they?



Do they still own anything? Apart from some possibly mythical right to sue?



Do they actually produce anything, do anything? [ Reply to This | # ]



Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, March 27 2013 @ 04:54 AM EDT

Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, March 27 2013 @ 05:08 AM EDT

If the destruction of the business records has been done then how can SCO bring

a new case. The records are destroyed so what evidence can they use. (I am sorry

I do not understand the law in this area.) If they found something new then

surely there maybe a case for not making it available during discovery and then

if they have the evidence, so claimed, then they perhaps did not destroy all the

documents but only selected ones.



All seems to be too a bit too convenient.



About time this was put to bed. I am glad I do not have shares or would have

even considered buy shares. I have a theory about "honesty in

business" and this on the surface of it seems a classic case. [ Reply to This | # ]



Authored by: TheMole on Wednesday, March 27 2013 @ 05:36 AM EDT

Ah, what a beautifully subtle reference, PJ!



When, as a young lad we sang this nursery rhyme at school, it was explained that

the words date back to London in 1665 and refer to the symptoms of plague.....



RA [ Reply to This | # ]



Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, March 27 2013 @ 06:36 AM EDT

The Rasputin of the American business world. [ Reply to This | # ]



Authored by: polymath on Wednesday, March 27 2013 @ 07:07 AM EDT

How do you spell zombie? SCO [ Reply to This | # ]



Frivolous remarks... "scombie" - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, March 27 2013 @ 01:48 PM EDT

- Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, March 27 2013 @ 01:48 PM EDT Frivolous remarks... - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, March 27 2013 @ 03:42 PM EDT

Authored by: mcinsand on Wednesday, March 27 2013 @ 11:44 AM EDT

How long have we been waiting for SCOX to produce the contents of Blepp's

briefcase? 1 year on the motion is relatively speedy, in comparison. I can't

believe that it's taken this long to produce even a few lines of the 'mountains

of code,' and I mean a few lines that were not improperly copied from BSD.



mc [ Reply to This | # ]



Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, March 27 2013 @ 05:48 PM EDT

...only to re-insert it?



Good LORD... You'd think they'd have figured this out by now. [ Reply to This | # ]



Authored by: Chris Cogdon on Wednesday, March 27 2013 @ 09:29 PM EDT

pseudocode, in lieu of a flowchart: if thing.moves:

if not thing.should_move:

if thing.moving_on_own_volition:

thing.apply ( shotgun )

else:

thing.apply ( duct_tape )

else:

if thing.should_move:

thing.apply ( wd40 )

You would not believe how long it took me to get the indenting right! [ Reply to This | # ]



Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, March 29 2013 @ 12:34 AM EDT

Just curious, what would the burden of proof be to re-open the case? What sort

of grounds would serve as the basis to deny the motion? [ Reply to This | # ]



Authored by: elronxenu on Tuesday, April 02 2013 @ 04:02 AM EDT