@Fath @PlywoodStick The rating systems is part of the reason why games go through the "Censorship" process. Directly from the ESRB website:

PACKAGED OR BOXED VIDEO GAMES

Packaged or boxed games typically sold at retail are rated using a "Long Form" process whereby ESRB raters evaluate the content of each game in advance of its public release. In these cases the publisher must provide two key forms of content disclosure as their game is being finalized:

a completed ESRB online questionnaire detailing the game's pertinent content, which essentially translates to anything that may factor into the game's rating. This includes not only the content itself (violence, sexual content, language, controlled substances, gambling, etc.), but other relevant factors such as context, reward systems and the degree of player control; and

a DVD that captures all pertinent content, including typical gameplay, missions, and cutscenes, along with the most extreme instances of content across all relevant categories. Pertinent content that is not playable (i.e., "locked out") but will exist in the game code on the final game disc must also be disclosed.

Once checked to ensure that all pertinent content disclosed in the completed questionnaire is reflected in the DVD submitted, the DVD is reviewed by a group of at least three trained raters who collectively deliberate about what rating should be assigned. Once the raters reach consensus on the appropriate Rating Category and Content Descriptors, ESRB staff reviews the raters' recommendation and may conduct a parity review to maintain consistency in rating assignments. A Rating Summary is finalized shortly thereafter, providing additional detail about the key factors that contributed to the rating assignment, including specific examples of game content or attributes. The final rating is then issued to the publisher, which may either accept it as final or revise the game's content and resubmit it to the ESRB, at which time the process starts anew.

There's a reason why games like RPGs can take so long to get through the rating process. There has to be one person who has to spend hundreds of hours combing through the entire game to make sure everything follows the guidelines of the rating board. They then list anything that conflicts with the rating that the company is asking for. Which means the devs have to change or remove that content and that same person has to once more spend hours combing through the game again. So do you know what companies have to do? They preemptively strike. Most of these companies have been in the business before the board was ever created and know what does and doesn't trigger alarms. So Nintendo/Atlus know what does and doesn't work for the T rating and have adjusted the content to match that so we won't have to wait an entire year for the game to come out. That's part of the reason why we're getting the game in only six months of the Japanese release.

Like I said in an earlier comment, "Daddy Nintendo" isn't trying to parent you. They could care less about what people people thought of their company and products. But they have to follow the rules and guidelines like everyone else. If you have a problem about it I left links to Europe's and The America's rating board respectively and you can tell these boards that the rules they have in place are crap and are ruining the experience of video games. I even left a little default message so it'll save people work.