Donald Trump’s attempts to undermine the First Amendment are undoubtedly troubling. But his attacks on the First Amendment are only part of the story. Trump is also stifling unbiased data and research that is coming from his own administration, and that is even more worrisome than his ongoing “fake news” crusade.

Silencing dissent and basic scientific data and research, all in the name politics, is behavior fit for a dictatorship, not a democracy, and Congress should act immediately to protect research and data, as well as whistle-blowers who are sounding the alarm on Trump’s censorship, before it’s too late.

ADVERTISEMENT

No issue has been the target of Donald Trump’s censorship more than climate change. As a candidate, he infamously called climate change a

“hoax” perpetuated by the Chinese

and now as president, is swiftly installing this nonsense into the lexicon of the federal government.

This week it was reported that the Department of Agriculture stopped using the term “climate change” and has been instructed to use the term “weather extremes” instead. Further, the USDA had to replace the phrase “reduce greenhouse gases” with the completely ambiguous “build soil organic matter, increase nutrient use efficiency.” We’re in the middle of the second hottest year on record and the president won’t let the federal government talk about it in words that actual humans can understand.

Government scientists fear Trump will suppress climate change study: report https://t.co/U3RR9Edsqm pic.twitter.com/bieBBNbpgl — The Hill (@thehill) August 8, 2017

In fact, one of Trump’s first actions as president was to gag employees at the Environmental Protection Agency, Interior Department, Department of Agriculture, and Department of Health and Human Services — agencies that are responsible for informing the public about climate change — from publishing press releases, blog posts, or otherwise publicizing upcoming public events. The employees at these agencies were informed that they could not even send “correspondence” to other public officials and instead would have to go through senior officials who were reportedly instructed to wait until they “received instructions from the White House.”

President Trump Donald John TrumpUS reimposes UN sanctions on Iran amid increasing tensions Jeff Flake: Republicans 'should hold the same position' on SCOTUS vacancy as 2016 Trump supporters chant 'Fill that seat' at North Carolina rally MORE’s climate censorship extends to the Department of Energy and the State Department, too. In March it was reported that a supervisor at the DOE’s Office of International Climate and Clean Energy instructed staff not to use the phrases “climate change, “emissions reduction, or “Paris Agreement," while just this week it was reported Secretary of State, and former ExxonMobil CEO, Rex Tillerson Rex Wayne TillersonGary Cohn: 'I haven't made up my mind' on vote for president in November Kushner says 'Alice in Wonderland' describes Trump presidency: Woodward book Conspicuous by their absence from the Republican Convention MORE, told U.S. diplomats to give vague answers about re-entering the Paris Agreement. How can we join with our allies around the world to address one of the biggest global threats we face if we can’t even discuss it?

Trump's Agriculture Department telling staffers to stop using the term "climate change" https://t.co/6cUFX2Cg39 pic.twitter.com/OY4sUrrl5W — The Hill (@thehill) August 8, 2017

Clearly, scientists share this fear because a draft of a comprehensive climate change report written by scientists from 13 federal agencies was leaked out of fear that Trump would try to suppress the findings. The report provides some of the strongest evidence to date that humans are primarily responsible for rising global temperatures since 1951 and therefore must immediately take large-scale corrective action. This finding stands in stark contrast to President Trump and the climate-change skeptics Scott Pruitt and Rick Perry Rick PerryOVERNIGHT ENERGY: Democrats push resolution to battle climate change, sluggish economy and racial injustice | Senators reach compromise on greenhouse gas amendment stalling energy bill | Trump courts Florida voters with offshore drilling moratorium OVERNIGHT ENERGY: Trump signs major conservation bill into law | Senate votes to confirm Energy's No. 2 official | Trump Jr. expresses opposition to Pebble Mine project Senate votes to confirm Energy's No. 2 official MORE he has put in charge of the EPA and Department of Energy, respectively, who argue human impact is minimal-to-non-existent.

The Trump administration's concerted climate censorship attack is a threat to our standing in the world, our preparedness to deal with a global crisis, and to our economy. A study by a team of scientists and economists published in the June 30th edition of "Science," the journal of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, found, essentially, "the warmer it gets, the bigger the hit to the economy" and if global warming continues unchecked it could result in up to six points off of the United States' gross domestic product by the end of the century.

Trump's EPA head casts doubt on "supposed threat" of climate change https://t.co/1NAZQpbSM5 pic.twitter.com/Qk8v1PZo7Z — The Hill (@thehill) August 9, 2017

The study predicts that the hardest hit regions in the United States will be the South and the Midwest, which could reportedly face "huge damage to their local economies, due to enormous electric bills, dying crops, or mass migration away from the area,” a warning that we cannot in good conscience ignore.

If left unchecked, Trump will continue to use censorship to remake the federal government in his own distorted image. We cannot let that happen, and every American has a responsibility to speak out against these reckless attacks on science, research, and transparency.

That starts with Congress, who has a constitutional responsibility to serve as a check on the Executive Branch, particularly when it comes to partisan overreach. They should act to protect researchers and scientists who should be able to work independently of political interference. Research shouldn’t be politicized and scientific findings shouldn’t be silenced to serve a president’s partisan agenda.

Emily Aden is the rapid response director of American Bridge, a progressive research and communications organization. Follow her on Twitter @emad16.

The views expressed by contributors are their own and not the views of The Hill.