Fact: a beautiful woman is flush with social capital. She has a lot of social and romantic options. This is the result of winning a genetic lottery, and nothing more. It’s inherited privilege.

A man’s options, on the other hand, are limited to his finances. So this too is an inherited privilege, or lack thereof. While the beautiful woman has many social options, the poor man is limited to the ugly and promiscuous women who accept him. Due to the materialistic tastes of women and the superficial tastes of men, romance is an intrinsically classist game.

The feminist community keeps the beautiful woman ignorant of social subterfuge, via social subterfuge. They want her to be ideologically naive, so that she will be open to polyamorism. The most beautiful women are usually brainwashed by their communities in this way. They are taught to be too trusting, and promiscuous.

The only ones they are taught to fear are male monogamists. These men, who are the only men who could emotionally do right by her in the context of a monogamous relationship, are stigmatized to her as ‘possessive’, ‘insecure’, and ‘territorial’. Which is especially ironic and hypocritical when they say this about someone who has few possessions, been deliberately denied security, and has no territory. This is how sexual conquistadors project their repressed guilt onto the relatively innocent scapegoat.

But not the friendly, schmoozing man-whore. You can trust him. He’ll never judge your background or blame you for romantic mis-steps. In fact, sycophantic apologists like these are always telling women that, even though they have a wider array of options than men, it isn’t their fault when they pick wrong.

The lower socio-economic class of men, however, face the harsher end of the double-standard. Not only are they confined to worse and fewer options, they are singularly blamed when picking one of these options, usually ‘chosen’ out of starvation-induced desperation, catastrophically fails.

What is ‘marriage material’ to a liberal? The fugly woman that no one wants. That’s who they want to marry off to some desperate schmuck. The really attractive woman? Everyone wants a piece of her, and it’s the goal of the community, collectively, to turn her into a pie chart, with all the comrades getting a slice.

As I said before, a lot of very careful brainwashing goes into this. In fact, admitting you are a monogamist, as a male, is like putting a giant target on your back. Marriage is a class privilege. An expensive one. So of course the sexual communists are going to sabotage that guy. They’re going to sabotage his career, and his emotional well-being, any way they can.

A smart, sensitive man can be made to appear stupid and callous if his feelings are neglected long enough. And such a man will almost certainly be deliberately neglected by the liberal community, which knows that lack of love will negatively affect their cognition. It will also make him brittle, and cripple him socially, for lack of good graces. This is probably why the World Health Organization has declared being single a disability.

The idea is, keep a man in a lower socio-economic class, and he won’t be able to afford his dream marriage. At the same time, get to the beautiful woman early in life and, through ‘anti-slut shaming rhetoric’, convince her to be promiscuous. This is all done under the guise of goodwill, but I assure you the intentions behind this are purely selfish.

So the monogamist is mischaracterized and kept down, while the promiscuous male is idealized as a true gentleman. And with all the love he’s getting, it’s easy for him to keep up the act. This is all carried out by the same feminists who say

If a monogamist is emotionally secure, cannot be coerced, brainwashed, or bribed, people will says his beauty standards are ‘unrealistic’. But given that there are many beautiful women out there, even if they are a bit uncommon, his standards aren’t unreal, just improbable. So all that is, when they do that, is them trying to undermine his self-confidence to sell him short.

The most pragmatic advice I can give to men who want a dream marriage:

So as a plebeian male, your options are either: involuntary celibacy (or willful abstinence), the county meth orgy (local orgy people are rarely as attractive as the orgy people in porn, trust me), or a shotgun wedding to the county pig. Or maybe, if you’re really lucky, you can have that end-of-the-line, still somewhat attractive 30-something woman fresh off the carousel. That’s best case scenario.

Part of rape culture is to sexually exploit someone, and then confine them to a ‘damaged goods’ social class. And that can happen to either gender, trust me. The difference is: women are warned about this, and men aren’t. Women do this against medical advice, and men do it out of educational neglect.

It’s all done collectively, through social brainwashing, quite deliberately, by liberals who will publicly claim ignorance and innocence. This is effectively a war on marriage itself, because the more sexual partners either participant in the marriage has had, the less likely it will succeed. This is because of what’s called ‘the traveler’s effect’ by psychologists. People who sleep around are also more likely to develop substance abuse problems, which will almost certainly lower their legal, social, and financial status. And then the liberals will simply blame the concept of marriage and monogamy as faulty, rather than blaming their own sexual Machiavellianism.

Women don’t want an argumentative boyfriend. They want someone who says ‘yes ma’am’. The smarter you are, the harder to manipulate, the less women want you.This is the feminine version of rape culture.