A brutal blood-soaked bid to wipe London off the map was a key factor that led to the city first emerging as Britain's capital.

New archaeological research is showing that London's elevated status stemmed partly from a Roman military and political reaction to Boadicea's violent destruction of London and other key cities in the mid 1st century AD.

The investigation, carried out by Museum of London Archaeology (Mola), suggests that the Romans shifted the capital of their British province from Colchester to London shortly after her revolt.

A key piece of new evidence in the Mola research shows that the Roman military built a fort in London immediately after Boadicea (more accurately known as Boudicca) had been defeated – but did not seem to have built an equivalent one in what had, until then, been Roman Britain’s provincial capital, Colchester. The research on the 125-by-90-metre playing-card-shaped fort is the first of its kind and has been published by Mola as a 263-page book – An early Roman fort and urban development on Londinium’s eastern hill. It was located just west of modern Mincing Lane, 230 metres north-east of the northern end of Roman era London Bridge. Archaeologists believe it would have accommodated between 500 and 800 troops – a mixture of legionaries and auxiliaries and of infantry and cavalry.

“The research on the fort is hugely significant for how we understand the early development and growth of London – and how, why and when it first became Britain’s capital,” said Julian Hill, a senior archaeologist at Mola.

Archaeologists studying the new fort believe the Romans decided that London had the strategic and logistical edge over Colchester, previously the provincial capital

What's more, quite separate work by British and other scholars now hints at the possibility that, at the same time or shortly after the fort was built, a huge temple to the Imperial cult may well have been constructed in London. One of the key symbols of Colchester's status as the province's pre-revolt capital had been its Imperial cult temple – but that building was partly destroyed during the rebellion, and although it was at some stage repaired, some inscriptional evidence from London suggests the possibility that post-revolt Colchester had to share the Imperial cult role with London.

With the new fort, archaeologists now believe that in the aftermath of the revolt the Romans chose London as their new British political headquarters.

It had three key strategic, mercantile and political advantages over Colchester. First of all it was the nearest point to the sea that the Thames could easily be bridged. The first London Bridge (just a few metres east of the modern one) had been built by the Roman military, probably in 48 AD. Secondly, unlike Colchester, seagoing ships could reach London and unload their freight there. And thirdly, again unlike Colchester which had been a major British tribal capital, London was a totally Roman "new build" city that therefore had no tribal political baggage or implications to be taken into account.

It seems that immediately after the Roman conquest had begun in 43 AD, the then Emperor, Claudius, was keen to impress (and co-opt the status of) Britain's most powerful tribal confederation, the Trinovantes by building his first great Roman fortress there – and making it the capital of the province. But, in 60 AD, when both Colchester and London were both destroyed in the Boudiccan revolt, the Roman authorities appear to have decided that strategic and logistical factors should now determine where their political headquarters and provincial capital should be – and London was then developed far more assiduously than Colchester.

London grew rapidly in the mid 1st century, with the development of a large forum, public baths, amphitheatre, major port facilities and other major buildings

Indeed, within 15 years of the defeat of Boudicca and the upgrading of London, the city experienced huge levels of imperial investment – including a large forum, a public baths complex, an amphitheatre, major port facilities and other major buildings – probably temples.

So rapid was the city's growth (and the consequent demand for residential and commercial real estate), that in about 75 AD the Roman authorities appear to have decided to relocate London's fort. Certainly, by about 120 AD a new fort had been built at the north-western edge of the burgeoning city – in what is now Cripplegate.

The huge military and therefore political importance of London in the post-Boudicca era was not just because of its fort. Archaeologists now think it is likely that most military hardware was channelled into Britain via London. And on the back of that very substantial military transport operation, mainly conducted by private vessels subcontracted by the military, a large-scale civilian mercantile trade rapidly developed.

Archaeological research is shedding light on the nature and scale of both the military and civil operations.

An analysis of finds from the post-Boudiccan fort (which operated from about 61 AD to about 75 AD) shows the sort of military hardware the troops there were being supplied with – everything from armour, spears and shields to horse fittings, oil lamps and writing equipment. In total, about 60 military items have been identified from the fort so far. However, archaeologists have, over the years, also found large quantities of broken military equipment which the Romans had used as part of landfill to raise ground levels on marshy land 400 metres west of the fort. So far, these include well over 500 fragments of Roman helmet, armour, weaponry and cavalry equipment – all potentially from the post-Boudiccan fort. It is the largest corpus of Roman military equipment ever found in Britain.

London commute through the ages Show all 30 1 /30 London commute through the ages London commute through the ages 1854 Ladies' crinolines are loaded onto an omnibus going from Sloane Street to Fleet Street, London Getty Images London commute through the ages 1865 Passengers wearing top hats on a 'knifeboard' omnibus travelling on the route between Bank and the Strand in London London commute through the ages 1900 A cyclist riding a penny farthing over Hammersmith Bridge, London London commute through the ages 1909 The silhouette of the Eros statue hovers above passengers on board a motor bus passing Piccadilly Circus in London Getty Images London commute through the ages 1910 Traffic outside Aldgate East underground station in London London commute through the ages 1913 A woman reading a copy of the 'Suffragette' magazine on an open-top London bus London commute through the ages 1919 London workers on their way to the city during the railway strike Getty Images London commute through the ages 1919 Traffic congestion on the Embankment, London, during the railway strike Getty Images London commute through the ages 1922 A man writing on a complaints poster on the London Underground Getty Images London commute through the ages 1924 Mr Baldock from Clapham Depot Trams arrives at the Law Courts in London to attend an enquiry set up by the Ministry of Labour, into the bus and tram strike London commute through the ages 1926 An independent bus crammed with commuters at Ludgate Circus, London, during the General Strike Getty Images London commute through the ages 1926 A crowded platform at Paddington Station, London, during the General Strike. Passengers have just arrived from Slough on a local train driven by strike-breaking amateurs. The locomotive at bottom left is a GWR 2221 Class 4-4-2T, number 2223 Getty Images London commute through the ages 1929 The Auto Red Bug, America's latest electric two-seater being driven through the streets of London Getty Images London commute through the ages 1940 Members of the public being entertained by an ENSA concert party in Aldwych Underground Station, London London commute through the ages 1940 People from the more densely populated parts of London sleep in underground stations after the nightly bombing raids London commute through the ages 1940 People sleep on the escalators of the underground stations after the nightly bombing raids Getty Images London commute through the ages 1948 A party of Swedish transport workers watching a London Underground train passing through an automatic wash at Hainault, Middlesex London commute through the ages 1952 Rays of springtime sun illuminate a railway policewoman in Liverpool Street Station, London Getty Images London commute through the ages 1956 Commuters travel through London's Piccadilly Circus tube station Getty Images London commute through the ages 1957 Crowds leaving London Bridge Station on their way home from work Getty Images London commute through the ages 1957 Guitarist Brian Hinton busking to travelers on the London Underground Getty Images London commute through the ages 1960 Fox photographer George Freston sits on the London Underground, reading a copy of D H Lawrence's novel 'Lady Chatterley's Lover', on the day the book went on general sale, after a jury at the Old Bailey decided that the book was not obscene, after a 33 year old ban. Fox photographer Les Graves is on his left Getty Images London commute through the ages 1967 London commuters try out the new Raleigh motorised small-wheeled cycle, which features automatic transmission London commute through the ages 1968 A mock-up at the 'Victoria Line' exhibition at the Design Centre, London, of the interior of a new type of carriage which was used on the new Victoria Line of the London Underground. The new carriages featured length ways seating to allow more room for standing passengers, two-level arm rests, which can be shared by adjacent passengers, and internal speakers for driver announcements Getty Images London commute through the ages 1969 Britain's Queen Elizabeth II inaugurates the Victoria line of the London Underground during the official opening ceremony London commute through the ages 1972 A protest against the proposed closure of London Underground's Central Line from Epping to Ongar, outside the Houses of Parliament Getty Images London commute through the ages 1974 Popular singer Desmond Dekker assists Mad Eric Jarvis in his attempt to break the world record for sewage pipe squatting, as they travel on a London tube train London commute through the ages 1975 A queue at the ticket office at Gloucester Road underground station, London London commute through the ages 1975 A policeman asks for the assistance of passengers from Moorgate Tube station following the train crash in the tunnel Getty Images London commute through the ages 1978 Passengers travel on the London Underground

There is even some evidence – Celtic-style metalwork – from the fort area and the landfill, suggesting that native British auxiliary troops from friendly tribes may have formed part of the post-Boudiccan London garrison

The newly re-examined evidence suggesting the possibility that London became a centre for the Imperial cult soon after the Boudiccan revolt is also potentially very significant. It consists of an inscription and two pieces of sculpture. Two items of sculpture (a marble head and a bronze arm) are from imperial statues, probably of the Emperor Nero – and almost certainly date from the 60s AD.

But it is the inscription which is the strongest indicator that London had a large Imperial cult temple. The inscription, in honour of the divine spirit of the emperor, was on a statue plinth which appears originally to have been about 2 metres wide and 1.4 metres high. The unusually large size of this probable plinth strongly suggests that it supported a bronze statue of truly monumental proportions – potentially double life-size.