

originally posted by: audubon

a reply to: proximo





She is basically inferring she believes Seth Rich was killed by Hillary, and that she feared the same fate for knowing what she knows.



Struggling to see how you got to that conclusion. From the way that the material is sequenced in the Post's article, it reads as though Brazile was afraid of Russian assassins. At least, the bits immediately before the Seth Rich remarks are about Russian espionage, and so are the bits immediately after the Seth Rich remarks.



(And why would the "Killer Clintons" let Ms Brazile publish such a damaging book anyway? Are their private hit-squads meant to be on strike, or something?)

edit on 4-11-2017 by proximo because: (no reason given)



Well, yes it does suggest it is the Russians she is scared of - but why?Why would the Russians want to kill Brazile? If Seth Rich was the source of some of the emails - and Assange has all but named him as such - and he was a russian asset, maybe I could see them wanting to kill him to tie up lose ends or something, but that only makes sense if we was going to expose them or something.Hillary on the other hand would want him dead to prevent any more leaks. Hillary also would not want Brazil talking for what she learned about how the Hillary campaign had rigged the primary, and what she knew about her health issues.I don't know it just makes more sense to me she would be afraid of Hillary if she is mentioning Seth Rich's death in the same breath as being in fear for her own, as I think she had much more of a motive to kill her than Russia ever did. That and I am one that believes where there is smoke there is fire when it comes to the clintons and the dozens of suspicious deaths of people who had potential dirt on them.I guess the one thing this statement makes clear is she as head of the DNC did not believe Seth Richs death was a robbery gone wrong - and that is a huge story by itself.