7 September 2012 Part 2: http://cryptome.org/2012/09/frey-chat-brown-02.htm 5 September 2012 LA Prosecutor Patrick Frey Chats with Barrett Brown Barrett Brown sends: Here you go. Also video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8wFnhK54exU&list=UUv1FlZ4TdveCyva7okPRmSA&index=

1&feature=plcp February 16th, 2011 Me = Barrett Brown Patrick = Patrick Frey, LA county prosecutor and conservative blogger Patterico In this chat, Frey accepts offer by alleged criminal mastermind Barrett Brown to have Anonymous operatives reduce the visibility of a blog post by Jeff Goldstein, a "classical liberal" blogger, academic, and Frey foe who runs ProteinWisdom.com. Brown agrees to look into the matter. Further conversations may be released as appropriate. As noted, this leak is being conducted in retaliation for Frey's failure to readily answer questions about a possible connection between Confederate/white nationalist Washington Times editor Robert Stacy McCain and the HBGary criminal organization as well as Frey's decision to publicly attack an RNC protester who was arrested in possession of a weapon, with the final straw being R.S. McCain's latest attack on Brown, whom the author and conservative stalwart denounced in public as deserving of FBI attention in 2011 - before later claiming instead that Brown is in fact an FBI informant based on his own misunderstanding of facts known even to many reporters who have covered Anonymous in the last few years. Frey is also the target of legal action due to another incident involving a different activist who is being represented by Jay Leiderman, the "Anonymous lawyer" who has secured pro-bono legal defense for more than a dozen other citizens who have been raided or charged by the feds since late 2010. Journalists interested in further details, as well as the bizarre connection between this and the "SWAT" story from earlier this year, may as always contact Barrett Brown at barriticus@gmail.com Don't wait. Retaliate. -Barrett Brown Project PM Patrick: Google Patrick Frey One of his bullshit posts is on the first page 12:41 AM me: I'm assuming it's transparent BS, though, of the sort that anyone who matters can see through? I'll look though meanwhile I'm getting off opiates decided to make my old heroin addiction public to avoid it being revealed by someone else 12:42 AM Patrick: No, it's a link to another post that would take hours to debunk even though it's utter bullshit me: oic Well That can be changed by one of several methods 12:43 AM Patrick: Oh? me: yep I'll have to think a bit about details you need to remember and this is something I don't say publicly NYT just refers to me as "Barrett Brown," for instance others as "informal spokesman" 12:44 AM Anonymous has no leaders or titles but certain people have more influence than others now, should note, I'm not talking about anything illegal I don't commit crimes 12:45 AM off the top of my head, though hmmm let me Google goldstein real quick hmm 12:46 AM Goldstein has top three results as positive references, plus one referring to someone else with same name then Sadly No piece which you really should read, by the way it can be changed such that top result is an article by mee Patrick: Oh, I have read it me: on Encyclopedia Dramatica detailing everything now 12:47 AM obviously a direct approach would not wokr as in, a bargain whereby he deletes or allows you to respond within the post he won't accept that most people would but most people aren't already fucked in case I'm being cryptic I'll note that on a couple of occasions I have had employers who owed me money and refused to pay up 12:48 AM until such time as I made it such that the top result for their name was an account of their flaws and failures oh, you may have seen what I did to my girlfriend's faggot roommate MCCain and Donald Douglas both ran the video I took it down after he moved out again, though, not likely to work but Darleen Click she probably wouldn't like it if I were to reveal 12:49 AM that she asked me for favors Patrick: ? me: help getting into Mad Magazine, lol I've got the e-mails understand that I am considered a great villain over there Patrick: Oh, for her cartoons? me: and she folded like a fucking umbrella as soon as I offered help being a person of no real virtue 12:50 AM yeah, her "cartoons" not very talented, regardless of the politics ham-fisted that's just something to consider in terms of relevant elements, thoguh lemme google you real quick 12:51 AM I may have to bring some specialists in on this Patrick: Hm 12:53 AM me: sorry, fucking GF bitching at me on IM, just ignoring her now Patrick: Fucking GF! me: damn right oh, Douglas hates you too? oh 12:54 AM oh shit over McCain! okay, dude, we're gonna get this taken care of fucking Douglas Patrick: The Donalde? 12:55 AM me: yeah Patrick: Yeah me: fucking douche disingenuous I really respected you for being honest about McCain because most are't might hurt the precious cause 12:56 AM Patrick: I've tried to mend fences with McCain. I don't think he's necessarily a bad man. I have not retracted and never will retract my belief that the statement I criticized him for was racist. But I still don't know that he is A racist. Full disclosure me: I mean, I know you don't know all of it I don't dislike him we talk occasionally I talk to most of my enemies but, yeah, he has some beliefs that he won't admit to Patrick: Do I fall in that category? :) I don't think so 12:57 AM me: well, he did write that article for American Renaissance now, the article itself is not anti-black Patrick: Not so sure about that me: remember that I'm not a liberal I don't cry racism over nothing and I don't refer to him as racist Patrick: I researched his kids and I think it didn't quite add up me: dude I'm from Texas Patrick: The number of kids he had, that is me: wait, what? 12:58 AM Patrick: The American Renaissance article me: no, that was him Patrick: The person who wrote it talked about how many kids he had me: he hasn't said otherwise himself Patrick: Wasn't it under a pen name? me: yes the one he used elsewhere I put this in my book, man Patrick: I don't think it's the same number of kids me: it went through fact checkers and lawyers well how many did they mention in article? 12:59 AM it appeared in 2002 some of his kids are young and it might have been written earlier suffice to say that he himself has all but acknowledged it was him Patrick: I think I tried to figure out when they were born me: I didn't realize others thought that was under dispute or I would have made the case more plainly Patrick: But I forget the details me: like I said, we confirmed it can't rememeber how 1:00 AM but it was good enough for the lawyers and fact-checkers anyway yeah, the guy is just overly pro-white I don't really care I'm not concerned about the extent to which someone is into his racial heritage, etc that's small beer 1:01 AM it''s just that he also makes accusations of racism and so have a lot of his colleagues without acknowledging this it's the dishonesty that infuriates me anyway back to the matter assuming this Donald Douglas article isn't damaging 1:02 AM I'm assuming that, I mean agreed? oh, ok just noticed that Jeff's piece is #2 1:03 AM I see pseudo-sarcastic charge of Semitism Protein Wisdom specialty well, for one thing as you're aware, to the extent that something else pushes it down, it gets... pushed down 1:04 AM to the extent you break some stories from those e-mails that will help but that's not enough I'd like to see Jeff beaten more severely might have to think this over talk to my Anons, etc 1:05 AM there's always a way 1:06 AM Patrick: Hm As long as any way is legal, I'm all for it me: well 1:07 AM what if it's legal... but Patrick: Do I need to hear the rest? me: nope Patrick: There you go It's legal, you say? Great! me: Good man Hooray! Yeah, we'll get on this -- Regards, Barrett Brown 512-560-2302