The Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA), negotiated by the previous Conservative government and now championed by the Liberal government, will reduce employment throughout the trade area, depressing wages in Canada and Europe, the report warns.

As Canada and the European Union reach the home stretch to an historic free trade deal, a new research report says the agreement was made on the basis of flawed, unrealistically optimistic economic models.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau delivers a speech after a signing of the CETA trade deal during the EU-Canada summit meeting, on October 30, 2016 at the European Union headquarters in Brussels. (Photo: Nicolas Maeterlinck/AFP/Getty Images)

UN economic researcher Pierre Kohler and Delft University economist Servaas Storm predict in the report that CETA will eliminate 227,000 jobs by 2023. Canada stands to lose 23,000 jobs, while the European Union stands to lose 204,000, the report forecasts. This is due to efficiencies created by a larger economic market.

That decline in jobs will depress wage growth, costing the average Canadian earner 1,776 euros (C$2,460 at current exchange rates) in foregone annual earnings. Europeans stand to lose between C$440 and C$1,850 per year, depending on the country.

“In the current context of tepid economic growth, competitive pressures induced by [the trade deal] will cause unemployment, inequality, and welfare losses. At a minimum, this shows that official studies do not offer a solid basis for an informed decision on CETA,” Kohler and Storm write.

The study appears in the latest issue of the International Journal of Political Economy. It challenges predictions made by earlier research, such as a 2008 joint study by Canada’s federal government and the European Union, which predicted a 20-per-cent jump in trade between Canada and Europe as a result of free trade. That would add $12 billion, or about 0.7 per cent of GDP, to Canada’s economy.

"Official studies do not offer a solid basis for an informed decision on CETA." — Kohler and Storm, "CETA Without Blinders," International Journal of Political Economy

​

But Kohler and Storm argue this projection, and others like it, are based on a flawed economic model. They say the “computable general equilibrium” (CGE) model, developed in 2005, makes too many rosy assumptions about how economies react to free trade deals.

For one thing, the CGE model assumes full employment — meaning it assumes everyone who wants a job has one, before and after the deal.

“In these CGE analyses, the Canadian and EU economies instantaneously and costlessly adjust to the trade reform,” the authors write. The model “dismisses any potential … costs beforehand and without justification, excluding from the outset any proven risk associated with deeper liberalization.”

However, some other economists argue the model that Kohler and Storm themselves used — the UN Policy Model — ignores some positive impacts of trade liberalization, so using this model will always underplay the positives of free trade.