Donald Trump has spent a significant portion of the past two and a half years soothing his deeply fragile ego by insisting he would have beaten Hillary Clinton in the popular vote if not for rampant fraud. His argument has typically centered around the repeatedly discredited claim that “millions of people” voted illegally in the 2016 election, which he formed and then disbanded a presidential commission to investigate. On Monday, though, he proffered a new theory for why Clinton kicked his extremely sensitive ass by nearly 3 million votes:

As is typically the case, no one knows precisely what the president of the United States is talking about. Presumably this tweet is a product of his tendency to pick up various threads of information from unreliable sources, let them rattle around in his head for a bit, and then spit out something incomprehensible to those who don’t speak Trump. Seven minutes prior to the tweet, Fox Business aired a segment discussing congressional testimony from psychologist Robert Epstein. In June, Epstein told Ted Cruz that Google’s bias had likely resulted in at least 2.6 million undecideds voting for Clinton, and that in 2020, Big Tech could band together and throw an extra 15 million-odd votes toward whomever the Democratic nominee turns out to be. As TechCrunch notes, Epstein puts out “anti-Google editorials almost monthly,” and has been attacking the company since 2012, when Google helpfully warned visitors to Epstein’s website that it had been hacked to serve malware to anyone reading it. And, as Mother Jones writes, there’s good reason to ignore not just the president, but the quack whose extremely unscientific work he seemingly attempting to reference on Monday: