After watching this. I recommend watching Dr Judy Wood Shows us the best forensic evidence to date about 9/11

These 2 posts/videos is a good start for people waking up, wanting to question authority & most importantly. Wanting to learn how to think for themselves! (Critical Thinking)

INTRODUCTION

0.01:02 – 12 parallels between Pearl

Harbor and September 11

0.14:10 – The debate: main issues

PART 1 – AIR DEFENSE

0.14:55 – Where are the interceptors?

0.16:12 – The “incompetence theory”

(radars, transponders)

0.22:00 – The military drills

0.29:40 – Specific warnings

0.33:08 – The chain of command

0.38:10 – Promotions, not punishments

0.39:50 – The Mineta case

0.47:38 – Debunkers: “Mineta was mistaken”

0.53:18 – The Mineta case – A summary

PART 2 – THE HIJACKERS

0.57:15 – “Piss-poor student pilots”

0.59:38 – Marwan al-Sheikki (UA175)

1.01:52 – Ziad Jarrah (UA93)

1.03:06 – Hani Hanjour (AA77)

1.04:00 – The debunkers’ positions

1.06:00 – 2 simulations of the Pentagon attack

1.13:10 – Someone knew?

1.16:40 – Airport security cameras

1.20.15 – The missing black boxes

PART 3 – THE AIRPLANES

1.26:50 – Passenger planes or military drones?

1.28:20 – Impossible speeds

1.37:30 – What happened to the passengers?

1.38:35 – The cellphone calls

1.48:30 – The debunkers’ position

1.50:38 – If not from the planes, from where?

PART 4 – THE PENTAGON

0.02:35 – Downed light poles

0.03:30 – The missing plane

0.04:30 – The official version

0.05:24 – Problems with the official version (wing, ailerons, tail, engines)

0.13:09 – The mystery hole

0.14:10 – The debunkers’ explanations

0.16:20 – Conclusions on damage analysis

0.17:00 – The missing tapes

0.18:30 – Security video analysis

0.23.40 – Pentagon summary

PART 5 – FLIGHT 93

0.24.15 – The empty hole

0.28.00 – The debunkers’ explanations

0.33:00 – Plane crash or bomb explosion?

0.34:50 – The debris field

0.37.20 – The shootdown hypothesis

0.38:50 – The small white plane

0.41:40 – “Let’s roll”

0.44:25 – Summary of Flight 93

PART 6 – THE TWIN TOWERS

0.45:10 – Introduction

0.47:45 – The Towers’ small dirty secret

0.53:10 – Larry Silverstein

0.56:15 – NIST vs. Architects & Engineers

0.58:00 – Robust or fragile buildings?

1.04:45 – The initial collapse – Explanation #1

1.05:45 – The initial collapse – Explanation #2

1.07:35 – Problems with the official explanation

1.18:00 – The full collapse – No official explanation

1.18:50 – Law of physics violated

1.20:50 – The Twin Towers and freefall

1.27:50 – Debunkers’ response to A&E



PART 6 – THE TWIN TOWERS (continued)

0.00:20 – The hypothesis of controlled demolitions

0.01:08 – Debunkers: “Impossible to place explosives”

0.07:34 – Explosions in the Twin Towers (witnesses)

0.15:00 – “Fuel in elevators shafts” theory

0.23:25 – Debunkers: “Explosions not recorded by tv cameras”

0.30:26 – Squibs

0.33:00 – Explosive force (montage)

0.35:00 – Ejecta

0.38:00 – Diagonal cuts

0.40:15 – What happened to the hat trusses?

0.42:20 – Extreme temperatures

0.45:30 – Debunkers’ explanations

0.46:45 – Twisted and mangled beams

0.47:40 – Molten steel

0.51:05 – Molten concrete

0.53:50 – Pulverization

0.57:40 – Victims vaporized

1.02:20 – Conclusion on the Twin Towers

PART 7 – BUILDING 7

1.05:10 – Introduction

1.06:35 – Official version by NIST

1.09:36 – Collapse computer simulation

1.11:00 – Fire computer simulation

1.12:20 – Debunkers: “Building 7 weaker”

1.14:25 – Preknowledge

1.19:00 – Symmetry

1.20:00 – Freefall

EPILOGUE

1.22:30 – John McCain

1.24:35 – The last word