Skip to comments.

The Source of 0bummer's Uber Confidence?

9-4-12 | Self

Posted on by CincyRichieRich

First, I apologize to those offended by my purposeful title misspelling...we are in 1984 and they are watching, so I am protecting myself.

I lost sleep last night, some from sinuses, some from the thinking in this piece. 0="He" from now on.

He is very confident, so much so that Biteme gaffes don't concern him. Think about that. Is the election in the bag? Is it or could it be fixed already? Let me explain, which may be different thinking from what you've concluded about me already.

S***s, the puppet master and funder has bought copious amounts of gold already...rational thinking has it if R/R win, our $USD will improve, whereby hurting gold. Also, S***s spent also copious money getting secretaries of state in place to certify or not certify elections in critical states. I don't have those figures at my fingertips and am not that great at doing the formatting some folks here are good at. If anyone has the party affiliation of the Sec of state for various states, please reply with such. I suspect it's not in our favor.

Knowing dead people, illegal aliens, multiple votes, after hours extended voting, military NOT allowed to vote - meaning wide-scale cheating will be allowed by H***der/0***a, we know we have to win in thinking by at least 2-3% plus another margin to not trigger recounts (know that a recount will be a Franken over again).

Ok, now the part which I've saved for last...that is, perhaps the plan that he is saving for Nov 9th to the day he's supposed to leave office...that is the rulz for rad****s executive orders to "crash the system" with. I'm talking 100-200 such orders that he'll simply do at such a rapid, purposeful pace that Boehner falls out and cries so much he has no tears left. This would cause unrest and be the answer why the military vehicles were doing rounds in St. Louis and other cities...why the purchases of am*o were made by our gov't.

I am concluding he simply won't leave office...this is why he is having so much fun and he uses B***n to gaffe w/out a worry. I actually think B***n isn't in on the plan, and that perhaps 10 people including S***s are in on it.

Well, that's it. Call me crazy if you wish. Pray a lot; pray hard.



TOPICS:

Your Opinion/Questions

KEYWORDS:

vanity

Usually when I've vented I feel better. This time I don't.



To: CincyRichieRich

He’s confident because he has demonic backing... wait... did I say that “out loud”?



by 2 posted onby MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working fors)

To: CincyRichieRich

He is confident because he knows that the election process is a fraud and the fraudsters have selected him again. He is confident of a re-(s)election; so much so that he is barely campaigning.



by 3 posted onby ronnyquest (I spent 20 years in the Army fighting the enemies of freedom only to see marxism elected at home.)

To: CincyRichieRich

One thing that concerns me, is on Intrade, after moving down to +11, Obama is back up to a whopping +16% over Romney. What do those people know that we don’t?



To: ronnyquest

He is confident because he knows that the election process is a fraud and the fraudsters have selected him again. He is confident of a re-(s)election; so much so that he is barely campaigning.

Seriously, who are the fraudsters you mention? This is the part I want to have a discussion about. Are you agreeing with my theory or are there other fraudster on our side? I believe McPain was one.

Seriously, who are the fraudsters you mention? This is the part I want to have a discussion about. Are you agreeing with my theory or are there other fraudster on our side? I believe McPain was one.

by 5 posted onby CincyRichieRich (Keep your head up and keep moving forward!)

To: ronnyquest

He is confident because he knows that the election process is a fraud and the fraudsters have selected him again. He is confident of a re-(s)election; so much so that he is barely campaigning.

Seriously, who are the fraudsters you mention? This is the part I want to have a discussion about. Are you agreeing with my theory or are there other fraudster on our side? I believe McPain was one.

Seriously, who are the fraudsters you mention? This is the part I want to have a discussion about. Are you agreeing with my theory or are there other fraudster on our side? I believe McPain was one.

by 6 posted onby CincyRichieRich (Keep your head up and keep moving forward!)

To: CincyRichieRich; MrB

Call me crazy if you wish. Pray a lot; pray hard. I wish to call you crazy. Let me understand your line of thinking. You think Soros has enough money to buy enough secretaries of state to throw the election, but GOD may choose to override that if we pray hard enough? Curious. what percentage of praying do you think would give little old bashful GOD enough power to overthrow the great, omnipotent Soros? Nice thread, bozo.



To: CincyRichieRich

You are assuming that there IS an election. I expect a ‘crisis’ so that martial law is implemented, and the election is ‘postponed’.



by 8 posted onby mathluv ( Conservative first and foremost, republican second)

To: expat1000

One thing that concerns me, is on Intrade, after moving down to +11, Obama is back up to a whopping +16% over Romney. What do those people know that we dont?

Thank you! that was one part I meant to include...the 62-38 favor of 0bummer...who are the “investors in Intrade”? Meaning, are they libs or what? In theory, you would expect Intrade to follow say, Rasmussen polls.

Thank you! that was one part I meant to include...the 62-38 favor of 0bummer...who are the “investors in Intrade”? Meaning, are they libs or what? In theory, you would expect Intrade to follow say, Rasmussen polls.

by 9 posted onby CincyRichieRich (Keep your head up and keep moving forward!)

To: CincyRichieRich

To: CincyRichieRich

Two words: Vote Fraud.



by 11 posted onby Darksheare (Try my coffee, first one's free.....)

To: CincyRichieRich

Intrade is a very small market. A large “investor” could move the market significantly just by betting on their favorite candidate.



by 12 posted onby NeoCaveman ("If I had a son he'd look like B.O.'s lunch" - Rin Tin Tin)

To: CincyRichieRich

First, I apologize to those offended by my purposeful title misspelling...we are in 1984 and they are watching, so I am protecting myself. too dumb; didn't read



by 13 posted onby Sloth (If a tax break counts as "spending" then every time I don't rob a bank should be a "deposit.")

To: expat1000

One thing that concerns me, is on Intrade, after moving down to +11, Obama is back up to a whopping +16% over Romney. What do those people know that we dont? They know that the way a market works is that at the endpoint, the Intrade numbers will match up 100% with the election results because that's the way it works. What it does before that up and down has absolutely nothing to do with the end result. If markets are always accurate, then why does the term "market correction" exist?



To: sam_paine

I don’t think he’s all that confident nor do I think he intends to win. As for secretaries of state, Michigan has one of the best in the nation and seems to have pretty much shut down any large scale attempts at fraud.



by 15 posted onby cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)

To: CincyRichieRich; mathluv

You are assuming that there IS an election. Mathluv isn't the only one who thinks so.



by 16 posted onby Old Sarge (We are now officially over the precipice, we just havent struck the ground yet)

To: cripplecreek

I dont think hes all that confident nor do I think he intends to win. As for secretaries of state, Michigan has one of the best in the nation and seems to have pretty much shut down any large scale attempts at fraud.

Good posts and thanks. Good posts and thanks. Good analysis of InTrade from someone, too. That’s why I post...good discussion among, for the most part, like minded folks. One has to ignore a handful of ill-meaning pinheads and sloths.



by 17 posted onby CincyRichieRich (Keep your head up and keep moving forward!)

To: cripplecreek

I dont think hes all that confident nor do I think he intends to win. As for secretaries of state, Michigan has one of the best in the nation and seems to have pretty much shut down any large scale attempts at fraud.

Good posts and thanks. Good posts and thanks. Good analysis of InTrade from someone, too. That’s why I post...good discussion among, for the most part, like minded folks. One has to ignore a handful of ill-meaning pinheads and sloths.



by 18 posted onby CincyRichieRich (Keep your head up and keep moving forward!)

To: CincyRichieRich

I don’t think he’s confident at all. His internals must be showing him something ominous because they’re spending money in NY and California, states that haven’t seen presidential election ads in decades. If they’re in play..... Desperation is what I see from his camp. Election fraud didn’t get them a darned thing in the 2010 mid-terms, I’m not sure it can now. That was a monumentally important election for Obama and the Dems, and they got hammered. Are we to believe they somehow suspended attempts at election fraud then? I realize Obama wasn’t on the ballot, but the fact that he is on the ballot this time may be his biggest problem.



To: CincyRichieRich

As for Soros buying gold -- there is an implosion going on in Europe and Aisa. The euro is tanking. There are other countries on the planet besides us. Remember that Obama was confident about the 2010 elections, not to mention that he was convinced that he could get the Olympics for Chicago.



Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

FreeRepublic , LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794

FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson