Show paragraph

Securing supply chains may not even be necessary if there is no real demand for any product that could be supplied through those supply chains. If the following link is the great example of the business model trends for the 21st century, the next generation won't even be capable of functioning, especially while digesting fake-meat-products with escalated pricing correlated to increase profits as absolutely minimal nutritional also strategically increases, due to consumption.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2019-06-11/comcast-scion-tucker-roberts-leads-the-company-into-e-sports?srnd=businessweek-v2



The US is already out-of-the-international markets, refusing to acknowledge it's real role as now only the loss-leader as a dying gatekeeper for Chinese entrepreneurial skill and tactical maneuvers. Apple phones sure aren't a close match to Huawei. The last moves of bullying the rest of the world have only confirmed that US multi-nationals don't even comprehend their own suicide mission is quite successful. The US doesn't have any power to force any compromise of any thing.



US consumers won't even have to boycott as a retaliatory populist action. It's getting pretty obvious the majority are fighting to keep even the lousy roofs over their heads. With double-taxation, they really won't even have to worry anymore about much of anything. If they can't hardly consume, they sure don't have to think about it. The elites don't have to worry either, they have the masses exactly where they want them, as they scoop up the remaining spoils that they missed on the most recent go-round. No one person, male or female can elicit a 20% population response on-the-street anywhere in the US.



New teams of players of video-gamers, while the majority view players playing for money is a great non-supply-chain business model that will surely replicate world-wide. What a great loss-leader ideal! Bring it on to the new successful disruptive platforms to generate money for nothing. Does that business model create real take-away value anywhere for anyone? The pretend combat zones in an already fragile global economy may have to become real combat zones to create real destruction to allow real re-creation into some value somewhere, into some real forms, from what may be left to use in some way. That is, if anything is left at all. So what? Who gives a flip? Who can give a flip?