The vote to leave the European Union has already cost the average worker more than a week’s wages thanks to higher prices, a study shows today.

The fall in the value of the pound after the June 2016 referendum caused a lasting increase in the price of many goods, costing Britons more than £400, according to research by Dr Dennis Novy, a leading expert on the economic implications of Brexit.

Dr Novy’s chapter is one of 18 studies collected in a major report, Which way now? Economic policy after a decade upheaval, written by members of the Centre for Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE) and published on Thursday 7th February by the Social Market Foundation think-tank.

The report, to be launched at an evening reception in London, with a follow-up event in Warwick next week, presents insights from 25 leading economists who each draw on their own expertise to tackle the question of what a post-financial crisis, post-Brexit economic policy should look like.

In his chapter, Did the Brexit Vote lead to higher UK inflation?, Dr Dennis Novy, associate professor of Economics at Warwick University, draws on research he conducted with Holger Breinlich, Elsa Leromain and Thomas Sampson to calculate how much of the recent rise in inflation was caused directly by the referendum result.

The value of the pound relative to other currencies fell sharply after the vote, as currency traders sold sterling and other investors calculated that Brexit will lead to lower UK growth in the long-term.

Before the vote, £1 was worth around Euro 1.23 and is now worth around Euro 1.14. Against the US dollar, it fell from $1.44 to around $1.30 today.

CPI inflation in the UK rose from 0.4 percent in June 2016 to 2.6 percent in June 2017.

Not all of the increase inflation can be attributed to the Brexit shock to sterling. Other factors such as the global oil prices also contributed.

But by looking at the prices of goods (such as clothing, shoes and furniture) that are especially sensitive to currency rates, Dr Novy established that most of the increase in inflation was driven by the fall in pound after the referendum.

He calculated that the Brexit vote increased the UK’s annual CPI inflation by 1.7 percentage points in the year following the referendum.

Such an increase in prices means that that the average household had to spend £7.74 more per week, or £404 more per year, to afford the same purchases in the first year after the referendum.

The inflation shock continued after that first year, meaning households’ total costs since the referendum are higher still. CPI peaked at 3 percent in October 2017 and was still at 2 percent in December 2018.

Because the referendum meant higher prices but did not also boost wages, the overall effect of the vote was to reduce real wages, costing the average worker almost one week’s wages (4.4 working days’ wages) in the first year after the vote.

The impact of the inflation shock varies across the UK, because different regions spend different proportions of their income on the goods most affected by the price rises. So while London only experienced an inflation shock of 1.35 percentage points, Northern Ireland’s figure was 2.17 percentage points. (See table below for full regional breakdown.)

Dr Novy said: “It is clear that the average UK household is already paying the price for voting to leave the EU.

“The economic effects of leaving the EU will depend crucially on the outcome of the ongoing negotiations between the UK and the EU. But even before Brexit has actually taken place, the referendum shock of June 2016 has already had substantial economic costs for the typical household.”

James Kirkup, Director of the Social Market Foundation, said: “Some politicians argue that no-one voted to be poorer in the EU referendum. This study shows that whatever voters’ intentions, voting to leave the EU has already made everyone poorer.”

Commenting on the report, Professor Vera Troeger of CAGE said: “This new CAGE policy report considers four different perspectives to answer the question: What is the role of a government in a modern economy after the global financial crisis and Brexit?

“It is clear that the pre-crisis political consensus on economic policy needs to be re-thought, as it has failed many communities and regional economies.

“We hope that the perspectives in this report will be useful to Government and parliamentarians as they consider the way forward for the UK.”

Notes to Editors:





The full report will be published -- with a foreword by Lord O’Donnell, former head of the Civil Service -- at a Westminster launch event on Thursday 7th of February by the Social Market Foundation and CAGE. For details of the event, see http://www.smf.co.uk/events/way-now-economic-policy-decade-upheaval/



2. Table: Increase in inflation rate in the 12 months after the EU referendum result by region (percentage points)

Northern Ireland - 2.17% Wales - 1.91% Scotland - 1.88% North East - 1.85% West Midlands - 1.82% North West - 1.78% East Midlands - 1.75% South East - 1.67% Yorkshire – 1.73 East - 1.72% South West - 1.63% London – 1.35%

Media Contacts:

To arrange interviews with Dr Dennis Novy, or for other media enquiries, please contact:



James Kirkup, SMF director: james@smf.co.uk and 07815 706 601





Barbara Lambert, SMF media officer: barbara@smf.co.uk and 020 7222 7060





Sheila Kiggins, Warwick University: S.Kiggins@warwick.ac.uk and 07876 218166





About CAGE:

Established in January 2010, CAGE is a research centre in the Department of Economics at the University of Warwick. Funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), CAGE is carrying out a 10 year programme of innovative research.

The centre’s research programme is focused on how countries succeed in achieving key economic objectives such as improving living standards, raising productivity, and maintaining international competitiveness, which are central to the economic wellbeing of their citizens.

Our research analyses the reasons for economic outcomes both in developed economies like the UK and emerging economies such as China and India. We aim to develop a better understanding of how to promote institutions and policies which are conducive to successful economic performance and endeavour to draw lessons for policy makers from economic history as well as the contemporary world.

Research at CAGE examines how and why different countries achieve economic success. CAGE defines ‘success’ in terms of well-being as well as productivity. The research uses economic analysis to address real-world policy issues. The centre is distinctive in providing a perspective that draws on economic history as well as economic theory and is applied to countries at various different stages of economic development.

About the SMF:

The Social Market Foundation (SMF) is a non-partisan think tank. We believe that fair markets, complemented by open public services, increase prosperity and help people to live well. We conduct research and run events looking at a wide range of economic and social policy areas, focusing on economic prosperity, public services and consumer markets. The SMF is resolutely independent, and the range of backgrounds and opinions among our staff, trustees and advisory board reflects this. .







