Yemen Files Releases

Documents

EMails

Date: 2012-02-17 Subject: RE: G7-P-SAY - CASA - Conference Call Request From: Mosle, William B (Sanaa) <unknown@host> To: Holland, Kevin P CIV, AIR-4.5.1 <kevin.p.holland@navy.mil>

CC: Seastrand, Mark NAVAIR <mark.seastrand@navy.mil>



I read through everything, I had a couple of follow-ups.1. Would like to do a fact finding telecon with EADS along the way. Maybe when they get the first draft of the PWS. I want to challenge EADS up front for a strong rationale for the spares/consumables list to make sure we get good value and a smart package. They should have a documented basis of estimate for that submittal.2. What do you think the timeline is from “go.” The goal would be to expedite timeline.a. Date XX – funding available from DSCAb. Date XX – contract awardc. Date XX to XX – trainingd. Date XX arrival of FSR to Date XX (should be right on top of the next item)e. Date XX to XX – aircraft delivery windowf. Date XX- XX – spares / consumables / ground equipment3. I’d like to include a case line for a translator and an escort officer (OMC). With that many Yemeni out of the country it is good to have a cat herder that is responsible for getting them home.4. In general past 1206 work has had poor phasing of support (spares / consumables / ground equipment) with a/c arrival. I’d like to potentially put something into the PWS to address “phasing.”5. Export license to Yemen needs to be addressed. It should reference the documentation from the CNTPO contract as GFE or contract-to-contract transfer. I would expect there be a review and acceptance by the new contract team that the provided paperwork is sufficient. EADS should be responsible for the submittal to Spanish authorities.6. On warranty it would seem to me we would be covered Feb 2012 to Feb 2013 under the factory warranty and Mar 2013 to Mar 2014 under the extended warranty (presuming we do not overfly 500 hours in the first year. I’d like that to be an explicit discussion point to make sure there is no “fine print” misunderstandings. The first year of operational flying there is usually a reasonable amount of warranty work that should be managed by the FSR.7. Since the aircraft will have sat so long in Spain, do we want to consider acceptance flights in either Spain or Yemen prior to transfer. I would prefer Yemen as that would validate in-country supportability. I am thinking nothing complicated just 2 flights check flights. It also makes a good mil-to-mil engagement opportunity.ThanksChipWilliam “Chip” Mosle, Lt Col USAFForeign Military Sales (FMS) OfficerOffice of Military Cooperation (OMC), US Embassy, Sana'a Yemenmoslewb@state.gov , moslewb@state.sgov.gov (classified)office: 967-1-755-2079, mobile: 967-733-234-819, VOSIP:302-529-6740**Note: OMC-Yemen is eastern time +8 hours**-----Original Message-----From: Holland, Kevin P CIV, AIR-4.5.1 [mailto:kevin.p.holland@navy.mil]Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 10:59 PMTo: Mosle, William B (Sanaa)Cc: Seastrand, Mark NAVAIRSubject: G7-P-SAY - CASA - Conference Call RequestRyan/Kevin/Jalani,Can we schedule a telecon sometime in the next two weeks to discuss thissubmittal? Or potentially my questions would be answered by the next levelof detail on the case. I want to make sure we are all on the same sheetregarding Yemen ELC reqs, what is included (not included) during the periodof support (e.g. is repair & return included, is there a specific spareslist with an associated flight hours, what consumables are included versuswhat will Yemen have to support, if no consumables are in included when willa consumable list be available for Yemen to initiate their provisioning),presume USG will handle delivery under transportation line (CNIT providedflight crew).What are the contract deadlines for CNIT to have funds available to executethis effort within FY12?Thanks,ChipChip...regarding your questions. The follow on effort includes "spares" (consumables and repairables, along with Ground Support Equipment), training of 6 pilots and 22 maintainers, and a Field Service Representative (FSR) for a period of one year. The contractor will be responsible for the shipping and export requirements of all items. I have discussed the FY 12 funding requirement with NIPO and told them that funding must be received NLT 1 July, in order to ensure we make a FY 12 award. Any later than that and the risk goes up. They understand that and are working to that end.Other questions:1) is repair & return included? If you talking about warranty work, then the extended warranty from the storage contract will go out to one year after the expiration of the normal one year factory warranty (which begins upon aircraft acceptance by the USG), OR 500 flight hours whichever occurs first. All warranties issues will be between EADS and the govt of Yemen.2) is there a specific spares list with an associated flight hours? No3) presume USG will handle delivery under transportation line (CNIT providedflight crew)? The contractor, not CNIT, will be responsible for the delivery of all spares. The delivery schedule will be a part of their proposal when submitted.Please let me know if there's anything else I can provide for you. I'm currently working on the PWS for this and when I get a good draft, I'll send it to you to review and comment if desired. Also, I think having a weekly conference for this effort is a great idea. We can get NIPO, the Coast Guard, us, yourself and EADS (as required) on it. You can set one up at a time of your convenience and send out a meeting maker, or let me know and I can handle it.Kevin HollandCNIT Aviation PMNAWCAD AIR 4.5.1301-757-1176This email is UNCLASSIFIED.