This email has also been verified by Google DKIM 2048-bit RSA key

Re: DRAFT: National Urban League

Here's the latest on order: Carson Clinton O'Malley Carson is first but NUL won't say who is last and second to last because they do not want the press to know. So it's either: Carson, Clinton, O'Malley, Sanders, Bush Or Carson, Clinton, O'Malley, Bush, Sanders African American Outreach Director Hillary for America LDrane@hillaryclinton.com 202-557-5589 On Jul 30, 2015, at 9:49 AM, Karen Finney <kfinney@hillaryclinton.com> wrote: I agree, I'm comfortable with systemic racism, I don't think she needs to say white privilege and felt like the first part of the speech the tone felt a little too apologist. Sent from my iPhone On Jul 30, 2015, at 9:42 AM, Margolis, Jim <Jim.Margolis@gmmb.com> wrote: I like this idea a lot brian. And i think this would help give us a strong news hook. Recognizing that we need to hear from Marlon and others on this point, i just want to express nervousness on the phrase white privilege. No problem with expressing the point, i just fear how those words could be used later. I'm open to others saying this is a 'must have', but i'd like to discuss it. ------------------------------ * On this, I will note that a couple of our reporters told me they plan to either pre-write our Cuba speech, or send a colleague, because they intend to stay at Urban League for Jeb to document what they think is a big move by him to at least "try" to be inclusive and reach out to Af-Am community. I think it would make a big splash if she did a preemptive thing shooting down the compassionate conservative thing based on his record. Maybe if she invoked his "show my heart" quote and did a riff about "where is your heart when you support purging voters from the registration rolls... when you oppose restoring the Voting Rights Act... when you belittle the Black Lives Matter movement as 'political correctedness'..." etc etc On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:25 AM, 'Mandy Grunwald' via Speech Drafts < speechdrafts@hillaryclinton.com> wrote: > > One more thought on this. > > With Jeb speaking to the same group on the same day, this will be our > first back to back comparison. > > Do we know where his record/positions are weakest? Seems like we need > to think through how we want to win the day. And the bar is low for him. > > *Mandy Grunwald* > *Grunwald Communications* > *202 973-9400 <202%20973-9400>* > > > ----- > This email is intended only for the named addressee. It may contain information that is confidential/private, legally privileged, or copyright-protected, and you should handle it accordingly. If you are not the intended recipient, you do not have legal rights to retain, copy, or distribute this email or its contents, and should promptly delete the email and all electronic copies in your system; do not retain copies in any media. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender promptly. Thank you.