In an exclusive interview with, Urban Development Minister, however, said the party members should give their advice in private rather than going public. Excerpts...I do not think so. I am not able to understand why are you so much concerned about Swamy.Is he the government? He is one of the MPs..That is not the party’s view clear. That is not the party’s view, the government has not taken any view like that and people, members of parliament are free to give their advice. I wish they give their advice in private rather than going public on such important institutions like Reserve Bank of India but at the same time when the same time in a democracy people have got a right.You could know better, people know better, they understand see the world economy has slowed down, China is going negative, India is a bright spot, you have 7.3 to 7.4%. The world bank, the world economic forum, the ADB, the Moody’s, the Fitch ratings all are giving higher ratings to India in spite of all these and all, why are you attributing it to one noise here and there.There is no such view taken by the government. Whenever government takes a view it has been known. And we are asking particularly taking the name of Dr. Subramanian Swamy he is a very knowledgeable man but that is not the view of the government.The point is that..Simple government acts, government do not react. Government acts, do not react on each and every issue. Whenever there is a need for clarification the clarification is given by the government the other day some minister suggested that why do not you have a Maharana Pratap Road in place of Akbar Road, I said Maharana Pratap is a great son of this great country, he is a hero we must all worship him and the younger generation should learn from him. Naming is different from renaming. There are lot of places where we can name one of the roads after Maharana Pratap. There is no need to change a road’s name that has been clarified immediately.Definitely.The reason is very simple. We have exhausted enough time, enough debate has taken place, state after state are asking when if the GST Bill is coming, public opinion also is very strongly developing in favour of it. GST will enhance your GDP by 1.5% to 2%, that is the universal acceptance. So three issues at the end of the day and the finance minister had exhaustive consultations.Yes, definitely there is at the end of the day Sonia ji met Modi ji. She raised three issues out of three two has been already addressed one issue is remaining to my knowledge. The issue is a cap of tax, in the constitution it is practically it is not possible that was not the view of the Pranab Mukherjee when he introduced the bill, that was not the view of the Chidambaram nd he got the bill second time that is not the view of even Manmohan Singh ji also to my understanding.