We've asked Spotify for comment. However, it hasn't been sitting idle. The company has questioned whether or not Wixen actually has permission from its artists. It may be allowed to negotiate on behalf of musicians, but that doesn't mean it's allowed to sue on their behalf. Spotify could also try an argument it has used in another lawsuit, where it claimed that streaming doesn't imply distribution or reproduction rights.

There's a chance lawsuits like this might become moot in the US. A bipartisan House of Representatives bill, the Music Modernization Act, would simplify licensing by putting songs in a public database and granting companies blanket mechanical song licenses tied to market worth. Instead of having to hunt down all the parties involved in licensing a track, Spotify and its rivals would have a one-stop shop. The timing of the lawsuit (December 29th) isn't coincidental -- the Act would clear licensing actions taken before 2018 unless a lawsuit was already in progress. Wixen largely accepts the bill, but felt it had no choice but to sue if it wanted to have any chance of getting the licensing revenue it wants.

A successful lawsuit would be severely damaging to Spotify. It's still losing money after years of operation, and its entire revenue in the first half of 2017 amounts to $2.2 billion. It would go deep into the red and would likely have to raise subscription fees to have a hope of staying afloat. As such, we'd expect Spotify to fight the case tooth and nail, or at least look for a much smaller settlement.