woolly_sammoth: woolly_sammoth: I’ll get the logs now and try and parse them out to anonymise what data I can. Just to clarify, you’re after minuite by minute credits for pool liquidity providers?

Thank you for your reply. I don’t consider having these reports a priority, but I’m glad to hear they can be provided.

A total reward per minute is sufficient for that. There doesn’t need to be (or even mustn’t be) a single address in it.

I will try to make an evaluation of how important the regular traders and arbitragers were between 2016-01-15 and 2016-01-22 to create trading volume below 1% offset.

That requires data from NuLagoon in that time as well.

But given @henry’s forum statements during that time, I think I can safely assume, that NuLagoon contributed 10 BTC to supporting the buy side. I hope I remember that properly. I won’t dig that post up now.

I think arbitrage might work better than we think, although I can only militat against relying on that.

Then again it might help to include that into the liquidity provision scheme at dual side exchanges with decent volume.

And it might lead to the conclusion, that T1.1 needs a sufficient offset to fight off arbitragers - let them operate at a lower offset!

We shouldn’t compensate ALP to feed arbitragers. Let them eat the leftovers.

woolly_sammoth: woolly_sammoth: We all agree with your assessment of the current state of liquidity provision.

I don’t think so. Some do. But far from all.

woolly_sammoth: woolly_sammoth: please do take a break.

I will, I just can’t just say bye-bye without trying to motivate others to step up, which has in parts be successful so far considering @Nagalim’s and @zoro’s proposals to operate NuBots on Poloniex.

I realize that I have assumed several roles which I don’t want to let down by abandoning them. I feel responsible for it, but have started to back out, as you might have noticed.

After just asking for help, I started to introduce incentives for participation

And seriously, I don’t want to make money by that - I’d prefer see others step up and take over.

That’s a lesson I learned from @JordanLee when motivation the creation of FLOT.

I don’t intend to create a list of what I do - it’s all across the forum in more verbosity than some appreciate.

woolly_sammoth: woolly_sammoth: Heaven knows the work on the Pool software would have been completed ages ago had I not burned out completely with too many late nights looking after the first generation pools.

I’m truly sorry to hear that.

woolly_sammoth: woolly_sammoth: I value your input here too much to see you burn out like that and I’m sure others would agree. I would rather see you posting and have a flaky peg for a while than perfect peg and no MoD.

Thank you very much for the compliment.

Damage is already done. I will deal with it. Nu will go on - with or without me, although I very much think I will be around for some more time.

In the near future it will rather be less time than in the recent weeks, months or quarters.

It’s necessary to do that, although Nu is nothing short from the most important project I’m involved in - at least to me.

It has so much potential to do good (and earn people money).

zoro: zoro: why this is so strange?

The strange thing is that so far NSR holders could rely on people working for free, because of their passion and devotion, spending their time and even endangering their health.

I’ve come to a point where I can’t continue that way.

zoro: zoro: We need a peg police to look after liquidity in exchanges

This will be much easier with the proposal for a paradigm change I created, which most of the community don’t seem to enjoy.

I’m not going to delve into this any deeper here. There’s a thread for it.