Industry sources revealed to TechPowerUp some pretty interesting specifications of AMD's two upcoming GPUs based on the 4th generation Graphics CoreNext "Polaris" architecture. The company is preparing a performance-segment GPU and a mainstream one. It turns out, that the performance-segment chip, which the press has been referring to as "Ellesmere," could feature 32 compute units (CUs), and not the previously thought 40.Assuming that each CU continues to consist of 64 stream processors (SP), you're looking at an SP count of 2,048. What's more, this chip is said to offer a single-precision floating point performance of 5.5 TFLOP/s, as claimed by AMD. To put this into perspective, the company had claimed 5.2 TFLOP/s for the "Hawaii"/"Grenada" based FirePro W9100, which launched earlier this February, and that SKU featured all 2,816 SP present on the chip. So this chip is definitely faster than most "Hawaii" based SKUs.While "Hawaii" based SKUs feature TDP of no less than 250W, the new chip has a TDP rated no higher than 150W. AMD could pull off a "single 8-pin power connector" feat like NVIDIA, with quite some headroom to spare. The chip features a 256-bit wide GDDR5/GDDR5X memory interface, and 8 GB could be its standard memory amount. The first SKUs based on this chip could feature 7 Gbps GDDR5 memory.AMD will upgrade the feature-set to include HVEC/H.265 hardware encode/decode acceleration, DisplayPort 1.3, and HDMI 2.0a outputs.The smaller "Polaris" chip scheduled for 2016, which the press has been referring to as "Baffin," could feature 14 compute units, working out to a stream processor count of 896. It will be a mainstream chip, succeeding the "Tobago" silicon, which drives the current R7 360 series SKUs, although it wouldn't surprise us if it outperformed bigger chips, such as the "Trinidad" based R7 370 series. This chip has its peak single-precision floating-point performance rated at 2.5 TFLOP/s. Its TDP is rated at just 50W, and it is expected to feature a 128-bit wide GDDR5 memory interface, holding 4 GB of memory.

133 Comments on More Polaris10 and Polaris11 Specifications Revealed

1 to 25 of 133 Go to Page 123456 PreviousNext

#1 P4-630

Sorry AMD but not interested in these.... Posted on May 13th 2016, 8:21 Reply

#2 Prima.Vera

What an overly boring looking little card :) :) :) Specs are like....lol Posted on May 13th 2016, 8:23 Reply

#3 the54thvoid

btarunr So this chip is definitely faster than most "Hawaii" based SKUs. How many Hawaii parts were there? I mean, 290 & 290x but that was it was it not? I thought 79xx was Tahitti, and 380x was Tonga refresh of Tahitti. If this comes in at a good price point and matches 290X levels then it could my dad's next card. He's running an older 270X so this would be a great step up. How many Hawaii parts were there? I mean, 290 & 290x but that was it was it not? I thought 79xx was Tahitti, and 380x was Tonga refresh of Tahitti. If this comes in at a good price point and matches 290X levels then it could my dad's next card. He's running an older 270X so this would be a great step up. Posted on May 13th 2016, 8:34 Reply

#4 medi01

It turns out, that the performance-segment chip, which the press has been referring to as "Ellesmere," could feature 32 compute units (CUs), and not the previously thought 40. Yikes.



Let's see how it goes.

I'm definitely not interested in 449$+ 1070 and 699$+ 1080. Yikes.Let's see how it goes.I'm definitely not interested in 449$+ 1070 and 699$+ 1080. Posted on May 13th 2016, 8:34 Reply

#5 WhyCry



@ Interesting, I heard the exact same specs. btarunr were you told different GPU codenames as well? ;) Posted on May 13th 2016, 8:37 Reply

#6 RejZoR

From the looks of it, I'll be skipping this generation and just keeping my OC'ed GTX 980. I don't want to hear about damn Hawaii 2 frigging generations later. And while GTX 1000 series do seem to deliver based on PR stuff, question is, do I really need it? Doom 2016 runs maxed out butter smooth at 1080p and quite playable at 4K DSR. Returning me to the part where I'm skipping this entire generation, probably even the next one. Might be returning to the graphics scene when AMD's Vega launches. And NVIDIA's GTX 3000 series... Posted on May 13th 2016, 8:45 Reply

#7 Nihilus

So the Polaris 10 and 11 will be a 290 and 270 with lower power consumption and slower memory.



256 bit GDRR5x on the Polaris 10 will be much slower than the 512 bit GDRR5 of the Hawaii.

As of now, the 256 bit GDDR5x of the 1080 is slower than that of the 384 bit 980ti. Posted on May 13th 2016, 8:49 Reply

#8 btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator WhyCry Interesting, I heard the exact same specs.

@btarunr were you told different GPU codenames as well? ;) Yup, that's exactly why I didn't mention codenames. They sounded too dumb to be true, and could be used to trace back to my Tabasco bottle. Yup, that's exactly why I didn't mention codenames. They sounded too dumb to be true, and could be used to trace back to my Tabasco bottle. Posted on May 13th 2016, 8:59 Reply

#9 john_

Polaris 10 looks like an $199 card with GDDR5 and $249 with GDDR5X and why not, more stream processors. Polaris 11 on the other hand can play ball at around $149. Not bad, but when you create something that the competitor can easily much, you are vulnerable. And while these chips are nice and can be a big success, Nvidia can throw price cuts on 900 series or unveil GP106 sooner than expected and make those new AMD cards less attractive to those looking for a mid range card.



Of course, if AMD puts higher prices, things would NOT be as rosy as I describe them. Posted on May 13th 2016, 9:06 Reply

#10 RejZoR

Makes you wonder, will GCN 4.0 really be that more efficient they can use same GPU layout for the 3rd time? Posted on May 13th 2016, 9:06 Reply

#11 ssdpro

Sad.... Posted on May 13th 2016, 9:14 Reply

#12 Caring1

Prima.Vera What an overly boring looking little card :) :) :) Specs are like....lol That's assuming the pictured card is correct for the article.

It shows two six pin power connections. That's assuming the pictured card is correct for the article.It shows two six pin power connections. Posted on May 13th 2016, 9:22 Reply

#13 medi01

If I read slides correctly, only 7-8 million PC users got 290+/970+.



So. Yeah, boring, but sweet price. Posted on May 13th 2016, 9:35 Reply

#14 AsRock

TPU addict So no facts then still ?.



Industry sources revealed to TechPowerUp some pretty interesting specifications of AMD's two upcoming GPUs based on the 4th generation Graphics CoreNext "Polaris" architecture. The company is preparing a performance-segment GPU and a mainstream one. It turns out, that the performance-segment chip, which the press has been referring to as "Ellesmere," could feature 32 compute units (CUs), and not the previously thought 40.



Assuming that each CU continues to consist of 64 stream processors (SP), you're looking at an SP count of 2,048. What's more, this chip is said to offer a single-precision floating point performance of 5.5 TFLOP/s, as claimed by AMD. To put this into perspective, the company had claimed 5.2 TFLOP/s for the "Hawaii"/"Grenada" based FirePro W9100, which launched earlier this February, and that SKU featured all 2,816 SP present on the chip. So this chip is definitely faster than most "Hawaii" based SKUs. Posted on May 13th 2016, 9:44 Reply

#15 atomicus

Well this makes it abundantly clear that AMD really HAD to leak that possible VEGA release in October given they new these specs were pathetic in light of Nvidia's offering. AMD are at serious risk of fading away in to nothingness if they don't deliver something almighty with VEGA and get the jump on Nvidia, but Nvidia doubtless have the 1080Ti tucked under their sleeve which they'll whip out the moment AMD try to surge ahead. Poor AMD, I feel sorry for them, but ultimately no one wins here, least of all the consumer. Nvidia know they only need to do just enough and they're laughing all the way to the bank as their recent financial results demonstrate. Posted on May 13th 2016, 9:46 Reply

#16 ERazer

damn thats just pathetic Posted on May 13th 2016, 9:50 Reply

#17 Nihilus

384 bit with 6 gb on the polaris 10 would have been much more attractive on the polaris 10. For the 1440p gaming this card is designed for, 6 gb would have been plenty. Posted on May 13th 2016, 9:58 Reply

#18 OneCool

Wow!! None of that sounds worth a damn. I may have to go green now Posted on May 13th 2016, 10:04 Reply

#19 medi01

atomicus Well this makes it abundantly clear that AMD really HAD to leak that possible VEGA release in October given they new these specs were pathetic in light of Nvidia's offering. AMD are at serious risk of fading away in to nothingness if they don't deliver something almighty with VEGA and get the jump on Nvidia, but Nvidia doubtless have the 1080Ti tucked under their sleeve which they'll whip out the moment AMD try to surge ahead. Poor AMD, I feel sorry for them, but ultimately no one wins here, least of all the consumer. Nvidia know they only need to do just enough and they're laughing all the way to the bank as their recent financial results demonstrate. Jeez, people make it sound as if AMD's 480 series was supposed to compete with 1080 . Let me remind ya:



We are here:

370 - 950 (? does it even exist?)

380 - 960

390(x) - 970/980

Fury Nano - 980

Fury X - 980Ti/TX



We are moving here:

470 - ?

480 (5.5Tf) - ?

? - 1070 (6.5Tf) <= 449$, no thanks

? - 1080 (9.5Tf)

? - ?







1080 is in "too expensive" area, expensive, and doesn't offer too much an upgrade for existing 980Ti users (comparable price) with good overclocks.

So those guys are better off waiting



The only "mass market" chip that threatens AMD is 1070. But at 449$, uh, oh, who would buy that?



It is just about PR, in practice, we will likely get cards targeted at compeltely different parts of the market. Jeez,. Let me remind ya:We are here:370 - 950 (? does it even exist?)380 - 960390(x) - 970/980Fury Nano - 980Fury X - 980Ti/TXWe are moving here:470 - ?480 (5.5Tf) - ?? - 1070 (6.5Tf) <= 449$, no thanks? - 1080 (9.5Tf)? - ?1080 is in "too expensive" area, expensive, and doesn't offer too much an upgrade for existing 980Ti users (comparable price) with good overclocks.So those guys are better off waitingThe only "mass market" chip that threatens AMD is 1070. But at 449$, uh, oh, who would buy that?It is just about PR, in practice, we will likely get cards targeted at compeltely different parts of the market. Posted on May 13th 2016, 10:04 Reply

#20 ShurikN

If the specs are true, then i am more than interested in Polaris 10.

The problem is the pricing. If it is true that 10 will cost $350, then i can just get a 390x or smth... this needs to be $300 max. And with GDDR5X. If not it will fail. Posted on May 13th 2016, 10:06 Reply

#21 okidna

Nihilus So the Polaris 10 and 11 will be a 290 and 270 with lower power consumption and slower memory.



256 bit GDRR5x on the Polaris 10 will be much slower than the 512 bit GDRR5 of the Hawaii.

As of now, the 256 bit GDDR5x of the 1080 is slower than that of the 384 bit 980ti. Polaris 10 should be better than 290 (4,8 TFLOPS FP32/single precision), IMO it will be closer to 290X (5,6 TFLOPS). That's not bad at all considering the rumored TDP and if it priced accordingly (I'm thinking $199-249), will be a good card for 1080p and 1440p.



The more concerning part is the 2nd part of your post, memory bandwidth. Let's hope AMD create a more efficient compression engine for Polaris. Polaris 10 should be better than 290 (4,8 TFLOPS FP32/single precision), IMO it will be closer to 290X (5,6 TFLOPS). That's not bad at all considering the rumored TDP and if it priced accordingly (I'm thinking $199-249), will be a good card for 1080p and 1440p.The more concerning part is the 2nd part of your post, memory bandwidth. Let's hope AMD create a more efficient compression engine for Polaris. Posted on May 13th 2016, 10:09 Reply

#22 heydan83

Why people think that this GPUs are for competing with the 1080? these GPUs are for low/mid market, things that nvidia hasn't reveal for this generation.... Posted on May 13th 2016, 10:16 Reply

#23 Frick

Fishfaced Nincompoop medi01 Jeez, people make it sound as if AMD's 480 series was supposed to compete with 1080 . Let me remind ya:



We are here:

370 - 950 (? does it even exist?)

380 - 960

390(x) - 970/980

Fury Nano - 980

Fury X - 980Ti/TX



We are moving here:

470 - ?

480 (5.5Tf) - ?

? - 1070 (6.5Tf) <= 449$, no thanks

? - 1080 (9.5Tf)

? - ?







1080 is in "too expensive" area, expensive, and doesn't offer too much an upgrade for existing 980Ti users (comparable price) with good overclocks.

So those guys are better off waiting



The only "mass market" chip that threatens AMD is 1070. But at 449$, uh, oh, who would buy that?



It is just about PR, in practice, we will likely get cards targeted at compeltely different parts of the market. Aye this. Given a good price they'll be succesfull. Aye this. Given a good price they'll be succesfull. Posted on May 13th 2016, 10:17 Reply

#24 Steevo

Its the same formula they had going into a few other chips, small die mainstream chips first to get the process down before launching higher performance larger die chips. Considering how successful a chip that runs everything at 1080P with max settings would be with a super cheap price? Kinda like the 750Ti on crack.





Lets just hope they overclock well, and AMD gets out Vega in October. Posted on May 13th 2016, 10:49 Reply

#25 WhyCry

btarunr Yup, that's exactly why I didn't mention codenames. They sounded too dumb to be true, and could be used to trace back to my Tabasco bottle. Yes, that's actually why I didn't post this leak. However those specs were for mobile chips as I was told. Yes, that's actually why I didn't post this leak. However those specs were for mobile chips as I was told. Posted on May 13th 2016, 10:54 Reply