Re: Convincing Evidence That Fukushima Was Nuked By Israel Quote: Poison Originally Posted by . Why do we need such kookery. The so called "evidence" is just



Quote: Unermüdlich Originally Posted by Wasn't the earthquake that caused the tsunami over a hundred miles away from the northern cost of Japan, and miles under the ocean floor?



That explains the lack of quake damage prior to the arrival of the tsunami.



.



Quote: The following picture is the strongest reading for this quake on any seismogram anywhere in Japan. This was before the lie machine got running smoothly. Early on there were a few sputters and this REAL chart got out. As you can see on this chart, it was a 6.67 on the Richter scale, (not shindo scale, confirmed by PGA reference) This would fit in with NO structural damage in Sendai and the level of shaking in the video







Quote: Remenersis Originally Posted by Undersea nukes to create a Tsunami? I don't think that's actually possible, If I'm honest.



However, if you like conspiracies, you can look at HAARP. The HAARP is an alleged 'super-weapon' that can create storms at it its will. Go ahead and look it up.



Anyone who reads the article carefully with an open mind will need to question the official line. Sometimes I wonder why I bother to post anything here that contradicts mainstream news, since so many members seem to swallow it whole and without salt. Kookery? That's an insult. If you want to argue the facts, fine. Otherwise your post is an ad hominem attack, and repudiation without refutation is no answer. It seems there might be a good reason why you chose a user name synonymous with "toxin." By the way, you might want to proof your posts a little better for punctuation if you expect to be taken seriously, by me anyway.Your link is to the USGS, and the report alleges that their data were falsified, as I said. If you visited Stone's web page, you might have seen this text and graphic.As the Japanese graphic indicates, the epicenter was only 24 miles offshore at magnitude 5.63, and as the report points out, a 9.0 quake would have shattered any structure within a 500-mile radius, or across a thousand-mile diameter.OK, maybe you know better about what nukes can or cannot do, but I am well aware of HAARP and have posted plenty about it over my years on this board. If HAARP caused the quake, all that does is make direct U.S. government collusion more likely. It really makes no difference how the quake was caused. If man-made, it was an act or war.Anyone who reads the article carefully with an open mind will need to question the official line. Sometimes I wonder why I bother to post anything here that contradicts mainstream news, since so many members seem to swallow it whole and without salt.