The polls say the race between Clinton and Trump is narrowing. But as we all learned this year in the Democratic primary, the polls mean nothing when you vote in states that have electronic voting a/k/a e-voting machines and the manner in which those votes are tabulated.

So I feel safe in predicting that Hillary Clinton will win the Presidency by a margin larger than the polls currently indicate, and will win in states that currently show the race to be even. Why? Because of the ability to hack the vote using something called "Fraction Magic." Watch this video where Mimi Kennedy, Board Chair of Progressive Democrats of America explains how this works to Thom Hartmann.

For those of you who couldn't view the video, here is how Fraction Magic works to subvert an election and change the vote count. About 25% of all votes in America are counted on GEMS vote counting systems. GEMS stands for Global Election Management System, a software system operated by at least five different e-voting companies. Here is how the one ESS uses is described:

GEMS™ is a Microsoft Windows®-based election management and tabulation software. It allows election administrators to easily and completely control every step of the election process, from ballot layout to election reporting, all in one proven application. GEMS automates the complete election cycle from precinct/district setup, to race definition, tabulation and reporting. One-step ballot layout for electronic and paper ballots. Double ballot layout eliminated—an industry exclusive! The multilingual capabilities support numerous languages in both standard and ADA modes. Eleven languages already used in actual elections.

And here is how "fraction magic" works to change the votes that are counted on e-voting machines. First the vote is fractionalized, i.e., "[i]nstead of “1” the vote is allowed to be 1/2, or 1+7/8, or any other value that is not a whole number." What does this do? It removes the one person equals one vote. Then the fractionalized votes can be manipulated as follows.

[Fractionalized votes] allow “weighting” of races. Weighting a race removes the principle of “one person-one vote” to allow some votes to be counted as less than one or more than one. Regardless of what the real votes are, candidates can receive a set percentage of votes. Results can be controlled. For example, Candidate A can be assigned 44% of the votes, Candidate B 51%, and Candidate C the rest.

In short, Clinton votes can be counted in one district, lets say 1.7 as an example, while Trump, Stein and Gary Johnson votes can be counted as fractions totaling less than one. In this way, when the votes are counted you end up with a greater percentage of the votes counted for Clinton, even though the actual number cast for her is much less.

This seems crazy you might say. How can one have fractions of votes? It's simple really. The tabulator adjusts the vote fractions up or down using a rounding algorithm so that the vote counts come out on whole numbers. And this proprietary software is privately owned and controlled by the companies that sell these systems to local election boards and/or states who often provide the keys and the individuals who use them that are used to "tabulate" the votes. And guess who has donated to Hillary Clinton's campaign directly, through SuperPacs or the Clinton Foundation that work for her? E-voting machine companies. Specifically ...

Interestingly, much information has recently come to light about the Clinton candidacy. Notably, the hacker Guccifer 2.0 released documents which he took from the computer network of the Democratic National Committee. Among these files, one tabulated a list of big-money donors to the Clinton Foundation. One fact has gone unreported in the media: Two of the three companies that control the electronic voting market, namely Dominion Voting and H.I.G. Capital (i.e. Hart Intercivic), are in this list of big-money donors.

The same machines that have been pushed on us since that HAVA Act was passed by Congress.

Mimi Kennedy specifically claimed that there Bev Harris and her collaborators found evidence of election fraud using e-voting machines in the last race between former Alabama Governor Donald Siegelman to flip the vote to his Republican opponent Bob Riley back in 2002. Evidence the use ofof "fractionalized voting" tabulation has been discovered in court documents of the testimony of Melinda Meek regarding court documents in Ft. Bend TX in which e-voting executives discussed the problem of what to do if votes came up showing fractions.

Ms. Kennedy produced the documentary for Bev Harris and her organization, Black Box Voting, which you can find on YouTube and at this website. Here is the You Tube version:

And this is how I can confidently predict Hillary Clinton will win the election Tuesday by a larger margin than the current polls show. A margin in many states and districts that use GEMS tabulation systems to count e-voting machine votes far in excess of the margin of error, much as we saw in the Democratic Primary campaign where Bernie Sanders consistently received less votes than exit polling predicted in every state where where such e-voting machines GEMS tabulation software is employed.

So don't be surprised if Hillary outperforms the pre-election polls and defeats The Donald handily on Tuesday. It likely already happened to ensure that Hillary Clinton defeated Bernie Sanders in the primaries. What makes anyone think it wouldn't be used to ensure a Clinton victory against Trump by a large enough margin to make a full audit of the vote in critical states necessary for a Clinton electoral victory highly unlikely what happened in Ohio in 2004?