We finally got some results from Special Counsel Robert Mueller's Russia probe. Former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn has pleaded guilty to making false statements to the FBI. Court documents show Flynn has acknowledged talking to Russian officials in December 2016 about sanctions. This was after the election, so there still is no evidence of the Trump Campaign colluding with the Russians. In fact, there has never been any evidence of collusion with the Russians during or after the November 2016 election. Despite the lack of evidence, the Democratic Party succeeded in pressuring the Department of Justice to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate Russia's meddling in the election. Why did the Democrats insist on an investigation when there was never any evidence?

Ironically, we do have evidence of Russian collusion in the election - by the Democratic National Committee and the Clinton presidential campaign. We have evidence of a Trump dossier (opposition research) which was produced by the research firm, Fusion GPS, to sway the election in Hillary Clinton's favor. Fusion GPS was funded by the Democratic Party. The dossier contains allegations of misconduct and collusion between Trump and the Russian government. It turns out the 'opposition research' is absolute propaganda. The dossier also led to FISA requests by the FBI which was unnecessary and possibly illegal. Why aren't Clinton and the Democratic National Committee under investigation for collusion?

And there is more evidence of unlawful activity. Why aren't fired FBI Director James Comey and former Attorney General Loretta Lynch under investigation? Lynch met with former President Bill Clinton on an airport tarmac days before Comey held a news conference informing us that Hillary Clinton would not be charged in the email scandal. There is also evidence that Comey drafted a statement exonerating Hillary Clinton for her email offenses before the investigation was even completed. And as I recall, didn't Hillary Clinton lie to Congress about how many servers she had? The email scandal endangered our National Security. Why hasn't a special prosecutor been appointed?

And there is still more evidence of illegal behavior that needs investigation. Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration are at the center of a scandal involving the transfer of 20 percent of all U.S. uranium to Russia. The deal funneled $145 million to the Clinton Foundation. There is "substantial evidence that Russian nuclear industry officials were engaged in bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering" to expand Russia's nuclear footprint in the U.S. Why hasn't a special prosecutor been appointed?

So I ask the question - why are we investigating Trump election collusion when there is no evidence of collusion? There is plenty of evidence of Democratic illegal behavior that should be investigated. Wasn't America founded on equal justice for all? With all the taxpayer money being spent on the Mueller probe, I hope they do turn up something - maybe Hillary's 33,000 missing emails?

listen live watch live

Sims lives in Moorhead.