Three hours later, he began sending tweet after tweet deriding reporters for not accurately portraying him as a leader who’s “gotten more done in the first 3 1/2 years than any President in history.” He name-dropped his usual targets, like CNN, “MSDNC” and The New York Times.

“I read a phony story in the failing @nytimes about my work schedule and eating habits, written by a third rate reporter who knows nothing about me,” he wrote. “I will often be in the Oval Office late into the night & read & see that I am angrily eating a hamburger & Diet Coke in my bedroom.”

“People with me are always stunned,” he tweeted about his work habits. The article he was referring to may have been Thursday’s New York Times article by Annie Karni and Katie Rogers that began: “President Trump arrives in the Oval Office these days as late as noon, when he is usually in a sour mood after his morning marathon of television.“

Then Trump pivoted to another topic: Awards.

Pulitzer Prizes have been used to reward journalistic excellence and impact since 1917. On Sunday, in a thread that has since been deleted, Trump seemed to confuse those awards with Nobel Prizes — which he also misspelled on each reference.

For posterity in case they are deleted and reposted with correct words. pic.twitter.com/bQyvBsRrn2 — Ben White (@morningmoneyben) April 26, 2020

“When will all of the ‘reporters’ who have received Noble Prizes for their work on Russia, Russia, Russia, only to have been proven totally wrong (and, in fact, it was the other side who committed the crimes), be turning back their cherished ‘Nobles’ so that they can be given to the REAL REPORTERS & JOURNALISTS who got it right,” he wrote.

Trump added, “Lawsuits should be brought against all, including the Fake news Organizations, to rectify this terrible injustice. For all of the great lawyers out there, do we have any takers? When will the Noble Committee Act? Better be fast!”

"Nobel," "Noble," "Noble Prize" and "Pulitzer" were all soon trending on Twitter.

After taking down his original tweets, the president played off the mix-up as sarcasm: "Does anybody get the meaning of what a so-called Noble (not Nobel) Prize is, especially as it pertains to Reporters and Journalists? Noble is defined as, 'having or showing fine personal qualities or high moral principles and ideals.' Does sarcasm ever work?"

Trump has used sarcasm as a defense before. Last week, after an immediate backlash from medical professionals and cleaning product manufacturers over his suggestion Thursday of ingesting disinfectants to fight coronavirus, Trump said he was asking a sarcastic question, "just to see what would happen."

"I was asking a sarcastic — and a very sarcastic question — to the reporters in the room about disinfectant on the inside," he said at an Oval Office bill signing Friday. "But it does kill it, and it would kill it on the hands and that would make things much better."