First version of this post was originally written on my dev-blog: http://frogermcs.github.io/

A couple months ago, during MCE³ conference, Gregory Kick in his presentation showed a new concept of providing Subcomponents (e.g. to Activities). New approach should give us a way to create ActivitySubcomponent without having AppComponent object reference (which used to be a factory for Activities Subcomponents).

To make it real we had to wait for a new release of Dagger: version 2.7.

The problem

Before Dagger 2.7, to create Subcomponent (e.g. MainActivityComponent which is Subcomponent of AppComponent) we had to declare its factory in parent Component:

Thanks to this declaration Dagger knows that MainActivityComponent has access to dependencies from AppComponent.

Having this, injection in MainActivity looks similar to:

The problems with this code are:

Activity depends on AppComponent (returned by ((MyApplication) getApplication()).getComponent()) — whenever we want to create Subcomponent, we need to have access to parent Component object.

(returned by — whenever we want to create Subcomponent, we need to have access to parent Component object. AppComponent has to have declared factories for all Subcomponents (or their builders), e.g.:

MainActivityComponent plus(MainActivityComponent.ModuleImpl module);.

Modules.subcomponents

Starting from Dagger 2.7 we have new way to declare parents of Subcomponents. @Module annotation has optional subcomponents field which gets list of Subcomponents classes, which should be children of the Component in which this module is installed.

Example:

ActivityBindingModule is installed in AppComponent. It means that both: MainActivityComponent and SecondActivityComponent are Subcomponents of AppComponent.

Subcomponents declared in this way don’t have to be declared explicitly in AppComponent (like it was done in first code listing in this post).

Activities Multibinding

Let’s see how we could use Modules.subcomponents to build Activities Multibinding and get rid of AppComponent object passed to Activity (it’s also explained at the end of this presentation). I’ll go only through the most important pieces in code.

Whole implementation is available on Github: Dagger2Recipes-ActivitiesMultibinding.

Our app contains two simple screens: MainActivity and SecondActivity. We want to be able to provide Subcomponents to both of them without passing AppComponent object.

Let’s start from building a base interface for all Activity Components builders:

Example Subcomponent: MainActivityComponent could look like this:

Now we would like to have Map of Subcomponents builders to be able to get intended builder for each Activity class. Let’s use Multibinding feature for this:

ActivityBindingModule is installed in AppComponent. Like it was explained, thanks to this MainActivityComponent and SecondActivityComponent will be Subcomponent of AppComponent.

Now we can inject Map of Subcomponents builder (e.g. to MyApplication class):

To have additional abstraction we created HasActivitySubcomponentBuilders interface (because Map of builders doesn’t have to be injected into Application class):

And the final implementation of injection in Activity class:

It’s pretty similar to our very first implementation, but as mentioned, the most important thing is that we don’t pass ActivityComponent object to our Activities anymore.

Example of use case — instrumentation tests mocking

Besides loose coupling and fixed circular dependency (Activity <-> Application) which not always is a big issue, especially in smaller projects/teams, let’s consider the real use case where our implementation could be helpful — mocking dependencies in instrumentation testing.

Currently one of the most known way of mocking dependencies in Android Instrumentation Tests is by using DaggerMock (Github project link). While DaggerMock is powerful tool, it’s pretty hard to understand how it works under the hood. Among the others there is some reflection code which isn’t easy to trace.

Building Subcomponent directly in Activity, without accessing AppComponent class gives us a way to test every single Activity decoupled from the rest of our app.

Sounds cool, now take a look at code.

Application class used in our instrumentation tests:

Method putActivityComponentBuilder() gives us a way to replace implementation of ActivityComponentBuilder for given Activity class.

Now take a look at our example Espresso Instrumentation Test:

Step by step:

We provide Mock of MainActivityComponent.Builder and all dependencies which have to be mocked (just Utils in this case). Our mocked Builder returns custom implementation of MainActivityComponent which injects MainActivityPresenter (with mocked Utils object in it).

and all dependencies which have to be mocked (just in this case). Our mocked returns custom implementation of which injects (with mocked object in it). Then our MainActivityComponent.Builder replaces the original Builder injected in MyApplication (line 28): app.putActivityComponentBuilder(builder, MainActivity.class);

replaces the original Builder injected in (line 28): Finally test — we mock Utils.getHardcodedText() method. Injection process happens when Activity is created (line 36): activityRule.launchActivity(new Intent()); and at the and we’re just checking the results with Espresso.

And that’s all. As you can see almost everything happens in MainActivityUITest class and the code is pretty simple and understandable.

Source code

If you would like to test the implementation on your own, source code with working example showing how to create Activities Multibinding and mock dependencies in Instrumentation Tests is available on Github: Dagger2Recipes-ActivitiesMultibinding.

Thanks for reading!