[Haskell-cafe] ANNOUNCE fmlist

I am pleased to announce the first release of Data.FMList, lists represented by their foldMap function: > newtype FMList a = FM { unFM :: forall b . Monoid b => (a -> b) -> b } It has O(1) cons, snoc and append, just like difference lists. Fusion is more or less built-in, for f.e. fmap and (>>=), but I'm not sure if this gives any advantages over what a compiler like GHC can do for regular lists. My interest in this was purely the coding exercise, and I think there are some nice lines of code in there, for example: > reverse l = FM $ \f -> getDual $ unFM l (Dual . f) If you like folds or monoids, you certainly should take a look. One fun example: > -- A right-infinite list > c = 1 `cons` c > -- A left-infinite list > d = d `snoc` 2 > -- A middle-infinite list ?? > e = c `append` d *Main> head e 1 *Main> last e 2 Install it with cabal install fmlist Or go to http://hackage.haskell.org/package/fmlist-0.1 I owe a big thanks to Oleg Kiselyov, who wrote some of the more complicated folds in http://okmij.org/ftp/Haskell/zip-folds.lhs I don't think I could have come up with the zipWith code. This is my first package on Hackage, so any comments are welcome! greetings, Sjoerd Visscher PS. What happened to the traverse encoded containers (see below)? It turns out that it is a bit too generic, and functions like filter were impossible to implement. FMLists still have a Traversable instance, but only because the tree structure is (almost) undetectable, so they can simply be rebuilt using cons and empty. On Jun 15, 2009, at 1:29 AM, Sjoerd Visscher wrote: > Hi, > > While playing with Church Encodings of data structures, I realized > there are generalisations in the same way Data.Foldable and > Data.Traversable are generalisations of lists. > > The normal Church Encoding of lists is like this: > > > newtype List a = L { unL :: forall b. (a -> b -> b) -> b -> b } > > It represents a list by a right fold: > > > foldr f z l = unL l f z > > List can be constructed with cons and nil: > > > nil = L $ \f -> id > > cons a l = L $ \f -> f a . unL l f > > Oleg has written about this: http://okmij.org/ftp/Haskell/zip- > folds.lhs > > Now function of type (b -> b) are endomorphisms which have a > Data.Monoid instance, so the type can be generalized: > > > newtype FM a = FM { unFM :: forall b. Monoid b => (a -> b) -> b } > > fmnil = FM $ \f -> mempty > > fmcons a l = FM $ \f -> f a `mappend` unFM l f > > Now lists are represented by (almost) their foldMap function: > > > instance Foldable FM where > > foldMap = flip unFM > > But notice that there is now nothing list specific in the FM type, > nothing prevents us to add other constructor functions. > > > fmsnoc l a = FM $ \f -> unFM l f `mappend` f a > > fmlist = fmcons 2 $ fmcons 3 $ fmnil `fmsnoc` 4 `fmsnoc` 5 > > *Main> getProduct $ foldMap Product fmlist > 120 > > Now that we have a container type represented by foldMap, there's > nothing stopping us to do a container type represented by traverse > from Data.Traversable: > > {-# LANGUAGE RankNTypes #-} > > import Data.Monoid > import Data.Foldable > import Data.Traversable > import Control.Monad > import Control.Applicative > > newtype Container a = C { travC :: forall f b . Applicative f => (a - > > f b) -> f (Container b) } > > czero :: Container a > cpure :: a -> Container a > ccons :: a -> Container a -> Container a > csnoc :: Container a -> a -> Container a > cpair :: Container a -> Container a -> Container a > cnode :: Container a -> a -> Container a -> Container a > ctree :: a -> Container (Container a) -> Container a > cflat :: Container (Container a) -> Container a > > czero = C $ \f -> pure czero > cpure x = C $ \f -> cpure <$> f x > ccons x l = C $ \f -> ccons <$> f x <*> travC l f > csnoc l x = C $ \f -> csnoc <$> travC l f <*> f x > cpair l r = C $ \f -> cpair <$> travC l f <*> travC r f > cnode l x r = C $ \f -> cnode <$> travC l f <*> f x <*> travC r f > ctree x l = C $ \f -> ctree <$> f x <*> travC l (traverse f) > cflat l = C $ \f -> cflat <$> travC l (traverse f) > > instance Functor Container where > fmap g c = C $ \f -> travC c (f . g) > instance Foldable Container where > foldMap = foldMapDefault > instance Traversable Container where > traverse = flip travC > instance Monad Container where > return = cpure > m >>= f = cflat $ fmap f m > instance Monoid (Container a) where > mempty = czero > mappend = cpair > > Note that there are all kinds of "constructors", and they can all be > combined. Writing their definitions is similar to how you would > write Traversable instances. > > So I'm not sure what we have here, as I just ran into it, I wasn't > looking for a solution to a problem. It is also all quite abstract, > and I'm not sure I understand what is going on everywhere. Is this > useful? Has this been done before? Are there better implementations > of foldMap and (>>=) for Container? > > Finally, a little example. A Show instance (for debugging purposes) > which shows the nesting structure. > > newtype ShowContainer a = ShowContainer { doShowContainer :: String } > instance Functor ShowContainer where > fmap _ (ShowContainer x) = ShowContainer $ "(" ++ x ++ ")" > instance Applicative ShowContainer where > pure _ = ShowContainer "()" > ShowContainer l <*> ShowContainer r = ShowContainer $ init l ++ "," > ++ r ++ ")" > instance Show a => Show (Container a) where > show = doShowContainer . traverse (ShowContainer . show) > > greetings, > -- > Sjoerd Visscher > sjoerd at w3future.com > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe -- Sjoerd Visscher sjoerd at w3future.com