Skip to comments.

Hillary Rodham's 1974 Watergate "Procedures were Ethically Flawed"

N Y POST via Reagan Information Interchange | 8/16/99 | Jerry (Jerome) Zeifman

Posted on by Ed_in_NJ

Hillary Rodham's 1974 Watergate "Procedures were Ethically Flawed"

Jerry Zeifman sent us the letter below, which is "based largely on material previously published" in his book, "Without Honor: The impeachment of President Nixon and the Crimes of Camelot.''

The book is now out of print. However, a small supply of the limited first edition is still available. Information about it, and how to obtain a copy, may be found at: www.iethical.org/book.htm

Previously published in the NEW YORK POST

August 16. 1999

HILLARY'S WATERGATE SCANDAL

By Jerry Zeifman

IN December 1974, as general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, I made a personal evaluation of Hillary Rodham (now Mrs. Clinton), a member of the staff we had gathered for our impeachment inquiry on President Richard Nixon. I decided that I could not recommend her for any future position of public or private trust.

Why? Hillary's main duty on our staff has been described by as "establishing the legal procedures to be followed in the course of the inquiry and impeachment." A number of the procedures she recommended were ethically flawed. And I also concluded that she had violated House and committee rules by disclosing confidential information to unauthorized persons.

Hillary had conferred personally with me regarding procedural rules. I advised her that Judiciary Committee Chairman Peter Rodino, House Speaker Carl Albert, Majority Leader Tip O'Neill and I had previously agreed not to advocate anything contrary to the rules already adopted and published for that Congress. I quoted Mr. O'Neill's statement that: "To try to change the rules now would be politically divisive. It would be like trying to change the traditional rules of baseball before a World Series."

Hillary assured me that she had not drafted and would not advocate any such rules changes. I soon learned that she had lied: She had already drafted changes, and continued to advocate them.

In one written legal memorandum, she advocated denying President Nixon representation by counsel. This, though in our then-most-recent prior impeachment proceeding, the committee had afforded the right to counsel to Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas.

I also informed Hillary that the Douglas impeachment files were available for public inspection in our offices. I later learned that the Douglas files were then removed from our general files without my permission, transferred to the offices of the impeachment inquiry staff, and were no longer accessible to the public.

The young Ms. Rodham had other bad advice about procedures, arguing that the Judiciary Committee should neither 1) hold any hearings with or take the depositions of any live witnesses, nor 2) conduct any original investigation of atergate, bribery, tax evasion, or any other possible impeachable offense of President Nixon - but to rely instead on prior investigations conducted by other committees and agencies.

The committee rejected Ms. Rodham's recommendations: It agreed to allow President Nixon to be represented by counsel and to hold hearings with live witnesses. Hillary then advocated that the official rules of the House be amended to deny members of the committee the right to question witnesses. This unfair recommendation was rejected by the full House. (The committee also vetoed her suggestion that it leave the drafting of the articles of impeachment to her and her fellow special staffers.)

The recommendations advocated by Hillary were apparently initiated or approved by Yale Law School professor Burke Marshall - in violation of committee and House rules on confidentiality. They were also advocated by her immediate supervisors, Special Counsel John Doar and Senior Associate Special Counsel Bernard Nussbaum, both of whom had worked under Marshall in the Kennedy Justice Department.

It was not until two months after Nixon's resignation that I first learned of still another questionable role of Ms. Rodham. On Sept. 26, 1974, Rep. Charles Wiggins, a Republican member of the committee, wrote to ask Chairman Rodino to look into a troubling set of events. That spring, Wiggins and other committee members had asked "that research should be undertaken so as to furnish a standard against which to test the alleged abusive conduct of Richard Nixon." And, while "no such staff study was made available to the members at any time for their use," Wiggins had just learned that such a study had been conducted - at committee expense - by a team of professors who completed and filed their reports with the impeachment-inquiry staff well in advance of our public hearings.

The report was not made available to members of Congress. But after the impeachment-inquiry staff was disbanded, it was published commercially and sold in book stores. Wiggins wrote that he was "especially troubled by the possibility that information deemed essential by some of the members in their discharge of their responsibilities may have been intentionally suppressed by the staff during the course our investigation."

On Oct. 3, Rodino wrote back: "Hillary Rodham of the impeachment-inquiry staff coordinated the work. ... After the staff received the report it was reviewed by Ms. Rodham, briefly by Mr. Labovitz and Mr. Sack, and by Mr. Doar. The staff did not think the manuscript was useful in its present form."

On the charge of willful suppression, he wrote: "That was not the case ... The staff did not think the material was usable by the committee in its existing form and had not had time to modify it so it would have practical utility for the members of the committee. I was informed and agreed with the judgment."

During my 14-year tenure with the House Judiciary Committee, I had supervisory authority over several hundred staff members. With the exception of Ms. Rodham, Doar and Nussbaum, I recommend all of them for future positions of public and private trust.

Jerry Zeifman is the author of "Without Honor: The Impeachment of President Nixon and the Crimes of Camelot," which describes the above matters in more detail. (See www.iethical.org/book.htm)



TOPICS:

Culture/Society

News/Current Events

Politics/Elections

US: Arkansas

KEYWORDS:

bookreview

books

hillary

nixon

watergate

withouthonor

zeifman

In cycling through the channels just now, I saw wife-of-i42 lying to Katie (Perky) Couric about the Nixon impeachment, and how it "set such high standards" (MAJOR BARF). Apologies to those that have seen this article before, but it may not have been seen by newbies - and it is an important commentary by someone that was on the same side of the fence, and was fully familiar with her 'work.'



To: Ed_in_NJ



I'm shocked, SHOCKED, I tell you! You seem to be almost insinuating that the honorable Mrs. Clinton was less than 100% truthful in all things.I'm shocked, SHOCKED, I tell you! < /sarcasm >



by 2 posted onby Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)

To: Ed_in_NJ

I, for one, had not seen it and wish to thank you for posting this article.



It still leaves a burning question, to wit: How does this woman (and I use the term liberally) get away with it? How does she manage to keep buried, all of her egregious acts?



To: David Isaac

The same way one gets to Carnegie Hall -- practice, practice, practice!



To: Izzy Dunne

Someone should come out with a book that refutes, point by point, the lies in Lying History.



To: Ed_in_NJ

And the many of the same folks that holler about Homeland Security trampling on our rights would be only too happy to elect her president.



To: David Isaac

How does she manage to keep buried, all of her egregious acts? Obviously the problem is the very considerable portion of the population, including all "objective" (actually merely PC) journalists, which desires to not see what is in fact in the public domain, like this out-of-print book. The issue then is, how to inspire such people to decide to be willing to see? 'Tis a puzzlement.



To: Ed_in_NJ

In literature they call this foreshadowing of things to come.



To: xp38

Please, NO!



To: Ed_in_NJ

People seem to continue to forget, that Herself did not suddenly appear on the scene in 1992, as the candidate to be the first "co-President" in US history. She had been around for some time, one of the termites gnawing at the foundations of America, and one of Her first major accomplishments was to undermine Richard Nixon's defense in the Watergate aftermath.



Richard Nixon was a far more honorable person than any of his detractors, who would allow no refuge or civility in their pursuit of reversal of the will of the American people. And these very people seem to be so astonished when the same severe condemnation is applied to them, when they are caught out, intent on their own mischief.



Not everybody in America has forgotten.



To: Ed_in_NJ

There could not be a book that big.



To: Travelgirl; Budge

More info for your Hildabeast list...



by 12 posted onby TheBattman (Big Brother is closer than you would like to know......)

To: Ed_in_NJ



"They'll vote for me no matter what"



To: Ed_in_NJ

bump for later



To: Ed_in_NJ

LAW SPOTREP



To: Ed_in_NJ

Funny, we never heard any of this. Sure looks Hitlery was practicing her art of deceit even back then.



To: Ed_in_NJ

Thanks for posting this. I had not seen it before. I would like to see more of her background and things that she has been involved in over the years. These things must be brought to public attention while there is still time as compared to all of the vile things that Clinton hid was never exposed until after he was elected.



To: Ed_in_NJ

I've spoken twice with Jerry Zeifmann. Two lawyers from the Watergate investigation were not given referrals by him --- Bernie Nussbaum and Hillary Rodham.



To: LADY J

Thanks - it's good to know some are hearing this for the first time. If you haven't read "Boy Clinton" (Tyrrell), there's lots in there about bothtoons early days -- including her support of the Black Panthers (who at the time were advocating the murder of policemen), her internship with Robert Treuhaft (at the time, lawyer for the Communist Party), and other niceties. "Unlimited Access" (Aldrich) is also very good, regarding her WH years.



To: alloysteel

Well put -- and WE have to keep reminding the more forgetful!



Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

FreeRepublic , LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794

FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson