hold 950 DRK' in a single address (vin = 950, and MN disabled if these are moved), possibly in cold storage as it's allowed now

and keep 50 DRK in some place that allows mixing with other users

I do not pretend to be a coder, but Dr.Crypto's earlier comment got me thinking. He says:The first point has been dismissed, however I suspect that the second has some merit. During this time of growing adoption, while the need for liquidity providers exists, could there not be a wallet type dedicated to providing liquidity? This hypothetical wallet would only be used for mixing and not for other transactions. It would incur no fees, and if the need for liquidity is great enough, could even be incentivised with a percentage of the MN fee. Once initiated the removal of any funds would result in the destruction of its liquidity aiding status, and it would return to being a regular wallet incurring normal charges.Given the development of the spork code, I suspect that this could be coded in such a way that this wallet type could be enabled and disabled at will, as Evan sees fit. For my part, it is unlikely I will ever be able to fund more than a few MN shares, but I could certainly dedicate 50 or 100 coins to providing liquidity. Especially if it meant I could earn some duffs in the process. ;-)Edit: Hmm... I just read Dr. C's last post, and I see the problem. Could the mixing only wallets have an encrypted address, so the holders do not know the addresses that were being used. The block chain would show the real address, but no-one would know for sure if it was their wallet providing the liquidity. Like I said, I'm not a coder, so I realize this may be unworkable.