“That is a direct attack on people’s right to vote,” Vaudreuil said in an interview Friday. “I don’t want anyone not going to the polls because they’re confused or they don’t have an ID.”

The law was struck down by a federal judge earlier this year, then reinstated last month by a federal appeals court before recently being put on hold by the U.S. Supreme Court. The high court has yet to weigh in on the merits of the case, but isn’t expected to do so before Nov. 4.

Republicans have pushed the law, which polling shows the majority of voters support, as a way to protect election integrity. The U.S. Justice Department opposes the law as a potential roadblock to voting, especially for low-income minority voters.

Vaudreuil said in the past 20 years he can count on one hand the number of allegations of election fraud brought to his office, none of which resulted in major prosecutions. Voter intimidation allegations also are rare, but he worries this year there could be more cases because of how easily voters could be confused about the photo ID requirement.

“I just want people to know if they voted the last time, it’s the exact same process,” he said.