By all means. However my original remarks in leading to your $100 bet, which I then turned into a challenge to you, were these:"the fact remains that absolutely nothing has been done in terms ofto resolve this question [of how the towers could have collapsed in the incredibly destructive way they collapsed]"...and I was therefore seeking"a high-rise tower using a virtual model even...on the understanding that, in your case"the conditions of the build were agreed beforehand with @psikeyhackr and @aka (Since @psikeyhackr has long been a stranger to these parts, perhaps @Tony Szamboti could be encouraged to "referee" along with @aka instead, and we can retroactively waive my requirement that the conditions of the build be agreed beforehand.)If your tower here can be made to fulfil my requirements to a reasonable degree, I will pay you $100 of my hard-earned cash -- preferably to a mutually agreeable charitable cause we can decide on later.I would at least require a third dimension and the input of the two "referees" I mention, though, so I will see if I can contact them now -- provided you deign to publish this post, as all my contributions are now moderated before they are allowed to appear.As an aside, I felt many of my posts in the previous thread were very unreasonably moderated into oblivion.So, although I will continue to pop in on occasion to see how you're all getting on -- and stand by my promise to pay you $100 if my requirements are reasonably fulfilled -- do not expect to see me often unless there are developments that take my interest here.I'll be out in the real world, earning you your $100