Absolutely not. The paper on free data should not be looked at through the prism of net neutrality or discriminatory pricing. This is in fact guarding net neutrality very assiduously. This is in no way revising the discriminatory pricing issue at all.No. This will not require any agreements with telcos. We are looking for an automated scalable telecom service provider-agnostic technology solution to this problem, which does not require any agreements with or consent from telcos. Telcos will stand to gain as data traffic could increase. We are avoiding this gatekeeping role and the agreement business.Free data is typically discussed in the context of zero ratings, usually involving telcos in provision of free data. That sort of arrangement is banned. Telcos cannot have a role to play in these kinds of decisions of customers. Hence we are now exploring if can we have a telco-agnostic platform or a facility, where a content provider can offer its product for free and can attract a consumer for some incentive, so long as these arrangements don’t violate the principles of discriminatory pricing.We had raised this issue through a question in our paper on discriminatory pricing, but it somehow became insignificant. We did not receive any significant input on this part. The paper says that if free data were to be provided, then the whole procedure has to be automated, without any role of the network providers.Now that the government has asked us for our views on the whole issue of net neutrality, through the pre-consultation paper we wanted to be doubly sure that we do not miss on any of the issues. Within one month, we hope to have a full consultation, and then we would tackle all the aspects of net neutrality and give recommendations to the government.Free data is completely different from net neutrality. Differential pricing is certainly a part of net neutrality. As far as OTT (over the top) is concerned, we have already had a consultation on that last year. Now we need to take a call as to whether we should again relook at the OTT players issue in the final consultation that we hold.An application is providing the same service that a telecom company is providing. TSP provides the service under a licence, communications-based OTT don’t provide it under any licence. There is a regulatory imbalance.This is not a net neutrality issue.Presently, telcos can’t provide Internet telephony, or voice over IP, as it is not allowed in the country, since they are licensees. On the other hand, there are others who provide VoIP, which the same as Internet telephony. This again could be a situation of regulatory imbalance. So, VoIP to cellular and vice versa. We are going to bring it out in about a week’s time.The concept of net neutrality is evolving. Today, Internet is extremely important for the development of our country, and we have a fast developing startup ecosystem, for governance, banking, health, education. There, if you don’t have a clear separation between the network and content, we will create a mess. And if today we don’t tackle that mess, this mess will acquire its own momentum and then tomorrow it will be very difficult to tackle it. We don’t necessarily have to wait for others.What new initiatives is Trai planning to undertake to resolve call drops issue? We are in the final leg of deliberating on what needs to be done. We will come out with a response quickly.One part is very clear. Trai Act empowers us, and actually directs us, to take steps towards consumer protection. We will continue to take those steps. The call drop compensation was also one of the steps. We have already proposed some changes in the Trai Act and this is an issue which has been pending for the last couple of years. We are also deliberating, whether in view of this issue (call drops), whether any proposal has to go further in continuation with the earlier proposal. We haven’t taken a final call on that.Spectrum harmonisation is a great thing that the DoT has done. Trai has maintained that maximum spectrum should be made available to the service providers. We also believe that holding spectrum and not putting it to use is causing irreparable loss.