Ready to fight back? Sign up for Take Action Now and get three actions in your inbox every week. You will receive occasional promotional offers for programs that support The Nation’s journalism. You can read our Privacy Policy here. Sign up for Take Action Now and get three actions in your inbox every week.

Thank you for signing up. For more from The Nation, check out our latest issue

Subscribe now for as little as $2 a month!

Support Progressive Journalism The Nation is reader supported: Chip in $10 or more to help us continue to write about the issues that matter. The Nation is reader supported: Chip in $10 or more to help us continue to write about the issues that matter.

Fight Back! Sign up for Take Action Now and we’ll send you three meaningful actions you can take each week. You will receive occasional promotional offers for programs that support The Nation’s journalism. You can read our Privacy Policy here. Sign up for Take Action Now and we’ll send you three meaningful actions you can take each week.

Thank you for signing up. For more from The Nation, check out our latest issue

Travel With The Nation Be the first to hear about Nation Travels destinations, and explore the world with kindred spirits. Be the first to hear about Nation Travels destinations, and explore the world with kindred spirits.

Sign up for our Wine Club today. Did you know you can support The Nation by drinking wine?

It is astonishing to read The Nation’s reaction to the beginning of the Korean War, 65 years ago today. Not only is the following note from July 1, 1950, an endorsement of US military action—itself a rarity in the magazine’s history—but it assumes as obviously true the “domino theory” of communism in Asia that would ultimately to the war in Vietnam, which the magazine early and ardently opposed. By the end of the Korean War the magazine was skeptical of the war, but it is still surprising to see The Nation adopt what we would now recognize as the language of “humanitarian” interventionism. The comparison of Korea to Spain, and thus of Soviet Russia to Hitler’s Germany, of communism to fascism, is itself unusual for the Freda Kirchwey–era Nation. Ad Policy

The United Nations faces one of the gravest crises of its existence. The reaction of the Security Council was quick, efficient, and unequivocal, but in the nature of things it can amount to no more than moral aid to the Korean Republic. The immediate task of suppling military aid falls on us, and there is no question that it will be discharged. At the same time, the hope of preventing Korea from being turned into another Spain lies in the unity of all the powers outside the Russian sphere, acting through the U.N. and with its blessing. The complexities of the situation are too great to be dealt with summarily, but it must be plain to all that unless this aggression is stopped, neither the United States nor the U.N. will any longer be a barrier to the Communist conquest of Asia. As long as neither Russia nor the United States is officially involved, this need not, and probably will not, mean war. But if the test is dodged, there can be little likelihood of averting the ultimate disaster.

June 27, 1950



To mark The Nation’s 150th anniversary, every morning this year The Almanac will highlight something that happened that day in history and how The Nation covered it. Get The Almanac every day (or every week) by signing up to the e-mail newsletter.