CETA's Festering Wound: Corporate Sovereignty

from the just-chop-it-out dept

Remember CETA, the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada and the EU? Even though the text was "celebrated" back in October 2014, it is still not ready to be presented for possible ratification. As Techdirt has been covering, it's pretty clear that the problem area is the corporate sovereignty chapter, because of concerns about the huge power it grants to Canadian (and US) corporations. First there were hints that Angela Merkel wanted the so-called "investor-state dispute settlement" (ISDS) mechanism changed. Then France said the same -- twice. Most recently, the EU commissioner responsible for trade and trade agreements, Cecilia Malmström, indicated that it wouldn't be possible re-open the corporate sovereignty chapter, or to move away from "classic" ISDS to the re-branded version known as the Investment Court System (ICS), which the European Commission is pushing in an attempt to head off growing opposition to the whole idea.

However, the arrival of a new government in Canada seems to have changed the situation once more, as Politico.eu reports: With the new liberal government in power, there is hope for more flexibility to amend the [CETA] agreement via legal scrubbing, while not officially reopening it.



"We’re prepared to work with the EU to work in the direction of an international court for investment disputes," Canadian negotiator Verheul said. "But if the EU is going to press us to adopt an appellate mechanism that would certainly involve quite a bit of further discussion … We recognize that's a longer-term exercise." There are obviously some mixed signals there: yes, Canada is willing to tweak the details of the ISDS chapter, but no, it isn't prepared to go all the way to the Investment Court System -- probably in part because it doesn't exist yet, and its details remain sketchy. It's by no means clear how this will all work out in practise, but it does confirm that corporate sovereignty remains a festering wound in the CETA text, as it does in TAFTA/TTIP, where formal discussions about ISDS and/or ICS haven't even started (pdf).

Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and +glynmoody on Google+

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community. Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis. While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: canada, ceta, corporate sovereignty, eu, isds, trade