The author of Rolling Stone’s discredited “A Rape on Campus” story, Sabrina Rubin Erdely, will apologize Sunday in conjunction with the release of the Columbia Journalism School’s external review of the erroneous story, according to media reports.

Rolling Stone will also pull the story from its site and put Columbia’s review in its place, Brian Stelter reported Sunday on CNN’s “Reliable Sources.” The decision to take the story down is a fairly unprecedented step in the digital media era.

The reportedly 12,000-word review is expected to be a damning piece that places fault in all corners of Rolling Stone for errors made in the reporting and storytelling process for the campus rape story, published in November. Rolling Stone will also be taking responsibility for its errors, Stelter reported.

Also Read: Rolling Stone’s UVA Rape Story Review Will Be ‘Damning’

The review will be authored by Columbia Journalism School Dean Steve Coll. It is expected to be published on the Columbia Journalism Review’s website as well as on Rolling Stone’s site.

In March, police in Charlottesvile, Virgina issued their investigation’s findings, saying they found no evidence a rape occurred at the University of Virginia on the night in question in 2012.

Also Read: Rolling Stone UVA Rape Controversy: Friends of Alleged Victim Remember It Differently

“I can’t prove that something didn’t happen, and there may come a point in time in which this survivor, or this complaining party or someone else, may come forward with some information that might help us move this investigation further,” Police Chief Timothy Longo said to reporters.

“That doesn’t mean that something terrible did not happen to Jackie on the evening of Sept. 28, 2012,” Longo added, referring to the alleged victim and adding that his department was simply unable to corroborate her account. “This case is not closed by any stretch of the imagination.”

Also Read: Rolling Stone Backpedals on Bombshell UVA Rape Story: ‘Our Trust Was Misplaced’

Following the story’s publishing, media outlets including The Washington Post and CNN began to find holes in it.

It was also revealed that out of sensitivity to the female accuser, the author of the piece never reached out to any of the males accused of raping her.

Columbia’s review will be published at 8 p.m. ET. Rolling Stone has told TheWrap it will send a link to the report, but has not yet responded to our request for interview.

Related stories from TheWrap:

UVA Fraternity Considering Legal Options Against Rolling Stone

Rolling Stone UVA Rape Report Discredited by Police

Disgraced Rolling Stone's Independent Review of UVA Rape Story Is Bad Omen (Guest Blog)