Again, I calculated the Poynting Vector Fieldsfrom the prior csv Meep data files. (This is the equation, that's it really, this is the Abraham definition of the Poynting vector.)There is a strong, definite Poynting vector from the small base towards the big base, which means that the energy flux is from the small base towards the big base. This would mean, that in order to satisfy Conservation of Momentum, the copper cone needs to move in the direction towards the small base to balance the energy flow in the opposite direction. Alternatively, the Poynting vector field may all get dissipated into heat at the big base. But please note that Meep takes into account losses in detail in the copper model.The Poynting vector seems to be strongly associated with the RF feed from the antenna.The Big base is at the left and the Small Base is at the right for the xz and the xy plane views.NEW INFORMATION: We show here that those (Greg Egan, etc.) that pontificate that the electromagnetic fields inside the EM Drive produce a Poynting vector that sums up to zero over integer periods of time are plain wrong. The reason is that the Poynting vector sums up to zero over integer periods of time only when the electromagnetic fields are standing waves (waves that do not travel in the longitudinal direction). The RF feed antenna disturbs what would otherwise be a standing wave frozen in space and results in waves that travel in the longitudinal direction back and forth and a time variation of the amplitude electromagnetic field that is not a simple sinuosoid, as long as the RF feed is on. This results in a non-zero Poynting vector with a net pointing from the small base to the big base over integer periods of time (probably due to geometric attenuation of the travelling waves due to the conical taper). During EM Drive experiments, the RF feed is on: it is only with the RF feed on that forces have been measured.Notice that the period of this non-sinusoidal variation of the Poynting vector is half the period of the electromagnetic field (as expected from theoretical considerations).x = longitudinal axis along the length of the truncated coney,z = (transverse) Cartesian axes perpendicular to the longitudinal axisxz plane (Trapezium flat section)TS03 = peak flux (pointing from small base towards big base)TS04 = flux (pointing from small base towards big base)TS05 = flux (pointing from small base towards big base)TS06 = significantly less flux (pointing from small base towards big base)TS07 = minimum flux (pointing from small base towards big base)TS08 = peak flux (pointing from small base towards big base)TS09 = flux (pointing from small base towards big base)TS10 = flux (pointing from small base towards big base)TS11 = significantly less flux (pointing from small base towards big base)TS12 = minimum flux (pointing from small base towards big base)TS13 = peak flux (pointing from small base towards big base)