Share this

Article Facebook

Twitter

Email You are free to share this article under the Attribution 4.0 International license. University Georgia State University

Mangrove trees may be one way to protect against hurricane damage, researchers report.

Climate change is making the impact of hurricanes and other storms more dangerous—and more expensive. As the costs loom over coastlines across the globe, vulnerable communities are looking for new ways to mitigate the economic impact.

The researchers found that mangrove trees, which grow in coastal waters and have dense and stable root structures, may do just that.

Researchers documented how the presence of mangroves alters the relationship between hurricane strength (wind speed) and human-made light patterns as observed from space.

“Because the consumption of artificial light during the night time increases with income, the amount of human-made lights present after a storm tells us how quickly areas are recovering,” says Alejandro Del Valle, an assistant professor of risk management and insurance at the J. Mack Robinson College of Business at Georgia State University.

Using the satellite imagery from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the researchers were able to gauge the evolution of local economic activity in various communities in the aftermath of hurricane strikes. They found that areas protected by wide belts of mangrove trees are better protected against losses, and their economies rebound more quickly.

“On top of the ecological benefits that these forests provide—like biodiversity and carbon sequestration—there is also value in economic protection,” Del Valle says.

“Mangroves grow right up along the coastline, so they’re positioned exactly where they need to be, and their root structure protects against both winds and storm surge.”

The researchers found that in Central America the benefits of mangroves protection are substantial. While night lights decreased by up to 24% in areas unprotected by mangroves, in areas protected by mangrove belts of one kilometer or more, the impact on night lights was undetectable. Anything less than one kilometer did not provide the same level of protection, indicating that only large-scale conservation efforts are likely to offer benefit.

Other solutions for low-lying coastal areas may include building a sea wall or elevating structures to protect from storm surge. Still, Del Valle notes that those strategies don’t make sense for many communities.

“If you need to build a sea wall to defend Miami, that’s one thing, but most of the world is not that densely populated. So how do we protect those areas?” he says.

“We cannot build a seawall around the entire US, so it’s more important than ever to figure out how we can use existing natural habitats for protection. For the first time, we’re able to break down what the economic value of that conservation could be.”

The research appears in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Additional researchers from Georgia State University and the World Bank contributed to the work.

Source: Georgia State University