“My feeling is that I stand by every word of the analysis  what is between the covers of the book,” he said in a telephone interview. “For the year I have had to apologize for the stupid, silly subtitle that was slapped on to the book.”

Image Shelby Steeles subtitle was proven wrong last week.

He made it clear that he was the one who slapped the subtitle onto the book  “in about 30 seconds” when Barack Obama was trailing Hillary Rodham Clinton by about 25 percentage points. But, he added, “subtitles are marketing devices  I hate them. I’ve always hated them.”

He said that for “White Guilt,” his book before “A Bound Man,” he tried not to have a subtitle, to no avail. In that case, Mr. Steele went with another provocative subtitle: “How Blacks and Whites Together Destroyed the Promise of the Civil Rights Era.”

The editor in chief of the Free Press, Dominick Anfuso, disputed the idea that there was overriding pressure to come up with the most extreme subtitle to sell books. “It is the handful of largely successful books that do that, and that gives the impression that is what we seek,” he said. What publishers want, he said, are “good titles and good subtitles. Subtitles can make best sellers, but they don’t have to be provocative to do that. It is a package. They go together.”

The argument in “Bound Man” is about the challenge a black politician faces in finding a way between being a “challenger” to white voters and a “bargainer” who assures whites that racism is becoming less important in society. In an opinion piece in The Los Angeles Times after the election, Mr. Steele, who supported John McCain, wrote that Mr. Obama was offering typical liberal policies “freshened up  given an air of ‘change’  by the dreamy post-racial and post-ideological kitsch he dressed it in.”