In July, an Islamic terrorist attacked a U.S. military recruiting center in Chattanooga, Tenn., killing four Marines. An ironic icon that emerged from the tragedy was a photograph of a “no guns” sign affixed to a window riddled with bullet holes. Terrorists and madmen deliberately seek out areas where people are unarmed and defenseless.

Immediately following the Chattanooga shooting, Gov. Mary Fallin authorized the arming of Oklahoma National Guardsmen. It was the right thing to do. But wouldn't it be better if we were smart enough to shut the barn door before the horse escapes? We have a chance to do this in the upcoming session of the Legislature by removing restrictions that prohibit otherwise legal guns on college campuses.

Educational administrators have put forth a number of specious arguments against allowing people the right of self-defense. They have claimed that the mere presence of guns on campus will make the environment more dangerous. But they're unable to explain why this has not occurred in the states that allow campus carry. These include Utah, Colorado and Idaho. As of Aug. 1 of next year, campus carry will also be legal in Texas. Are the people of Oklahoma less responsible or trustworthy than those living in other states?

It has been claimed that removing campus restrictions in Oklahoma means “everyone” will be armed. Nonsense. To obtain a gun permit in Oklahoma, you have to be at least 21 years of age, pass a criminal background check, receive classroom training and demonstrate proficiency on the firing line. Individuals who have been adjudicated incompetent or who are receiving treatment for mental illness are prohibited from carrying a weapon.