AMD's 32-core Ryzen Threadripper 2990X appears on 3DMARK

Ryzen Threadripper 2990X confirmed?

| Source: TUM APISAK Author: Mark Campbell

AMD's 32-core Ryzen Threadripper 2990X appears on 3DMARK





This ups Threadripper's maximum core count from 16-cores to 32-cores while also adding the benefits of AMD's 12nm Zen+ architecture, offering a substantial performance improvement to those who use heavily threaded applications.



, a reliable source of leaked benchmarking information, has found an AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990X processors within the 3DMARK database, a 32-core 64-thread processor with a listed base speed of 3.0GHz and a boost speed of 3.8GHz. This leak lines up with previous rumours that AMD's 2nd Gen Threadripper 24-core would be called the 2970X and that the 32-core model would be called the 2990X. At Computex 2018, AMD shook the world with their reveal of their Ryzen Threadripper 2nd Generation 32-core processor , which is set to release later this year on their X399 platform.This ups Threadripper's maximum core count from 16-cores to 32-cores while also adding the benefits of AMD's 12nm Zen+ architecture, offering a substantial performance improvement to those who use heavily threaded applications. TUM APISAK , a reliable source of leaked benchmarking information, has found an AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990X processors within the 3DMARK database, a 32-core 64-thread processor with a listed base speed of 3.0GHz and a boost speed of 3.8GHz. This leak lines up with previous rumours that AMD's 2nd Gen Threadripper 24-core would be called the 2970X and that the 32-core model would be called the 2990X.

Previous rumours have suggested that AMD's Threadripper 2990X would offer a base clock speed of 3.0GHz and a could be overclocked to up to 4.1GHz on all cores when combined with a capable motherboard and a high-end liquid cooling setup.



You can join the discussion on AMD's 32-core Ryzen Threadripper 2990X processor appearing in the 3DMARK database on the OC3D Forums.

1 - Ryzen Threadripper 2990X confirmed? «Prev 1 Next»

Most Recent Comments