Send this page to someone via email

A jury has found Jean-Claude Savoie not guilty of criminal negligence causing death after his African rock python escaped its enclosure in August 2013 and killed two young New Brunswick boys.

Four-year-old Noah Barthe and Connor Barthe, 6, died during a sleepover in Savoie’s apartment.

The python escaped by travelling through a ventilation duct and dropping into the living room where the boys slept. A pathologist who performed autopsies on the boys said they died of asphyxiation and each was covered in puncture wounds from snake bites.

READ MORE: Python ‘coiled’ around N.B. brothers, repeatedly bit them, negligence trial told

Savoie and his relatives wept in court as the verdict was delivered Wednesday night.

In his charge to the jury Wednesday, Judge Fred Ferguson said that the Crown must have proven “three essential ingredients” in order for them to convict Savoie of criminal negligence causing death:

Story continues below advertisement

– That Savoie, “as the only adult in his residence that night,” had a duty to protect the brothers, and that he failed that duty.

– That he “showed wanton and reckless disregard for the lives and safety” of the boys.

– And that his failure to take “reasonably appropriate measures to care for or protect Connor and Noah Barthe” contributed significantly to their death.

WATCH ABOVE: Trial of python owner charged with criminal negligence in the deaths of two young boys begins second week 2:06 ‘Smell of food would really excite’ python, reptile expert tells N.B. trial ‘Smell of food would really excite’ python, reptile expert tells N.B. trial

“If Crown counsel fails to prove any one of these three essential ingredients beyond a reasonable doubt, you must find Jean-Claude Savoie not-guilty of criminal negligence causing death,” the judge said.

The boys had spent the day of the sleepover petting animals and playing at a farm owned by Savoie’s father. Bob Johnson, the now-retired former curator of reptiles and amphibians at the Toronto Zoo, testified at Savoie’s trial that snakes become more aggressive when they detect possible sources of food – and an attack would have been unlikely had there been no animal smells on the boys.

Story continues below advertisement

“Those boys could have been a stimulant to that snake,” he said. Tweet This

An exhibit from the trial of Jean-Claude Savoie is displayed in Campbellton, N.B., on Tuesday, Nov. 1, 2016. THE CANADIAN PRESS/HO-Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick

A number of witnesses testified during Savoie’s trial that it was common to see the cover of the vent on the enclosure’s floor, and the court heard the snake nearly escaped a matter of weeks before the boys’ death, but got stuck in the ventilation pipe.

Savoie’s lawyer told the jury in his opening statement that Savoie believed the snake was too big get through the duct, so he didn’t see a need to secure the opening.

READ MORE: Python ‘growled,’ lunged after killing two N.B. boys, Mountie tells trial

Savoie, he said, was clearly wrong.

“Being wrong isn’t necessarily criminal negligence,” said Leslie Matchim. Tweet This

Story continues below advertisement

In his testimony, Johnson said any snake enclosures for the Toronto Zoo would have a system of double doors and any openings would be securely caged. The enclosure in Savoie’s apartment had a “dryer vent” style of cover for the ventilation duct that was not secured with screws or tape, he said.

Johnson said the enclosure lacked items such as rocks and branches to stimulate the python.

“I would not say that is very conducive to the well-being of the snake,” he said.

A veterinarian who conducted the necropsy on the snake testified it appeared the snake hadn’t fed in at least 24 hours.

Johnson said once a snake bites, it is very difficult to unlock that bite, and the large snake could have coiled around both boys at once.

He responded to the earlier testimony of RCMP officers about the python’s aggressive behaviour after it was captured – hissing and lunging at the glass of the enclosure.

“A snake that responds like that is a very aggressive snake,” he said. “It was an extreme response to human presence. This animal was dangerous.” Tweet This