The latest paroxysm of urban violence, looting and recriminations in Baltimore prompted President Obama on Tuesday to trot out his Blame The Callous, Tight-Fisted Republicans card.

After dispensing with an obligatory wrist-slap of “protesters,” the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize winner got down to business: hectoring his political opponents and grousing that America hasn’t forked over enough money for him to make the “massive investments” needed to “make a difference right now.”

If we are “serious” about preventing more riots, the president declared, then “the rest of us” (translation: all of us stingy conservatives) have to make sure “we are providing early education” and “making investments” so that inner-city youths are “getting the training they need to find jobs.”

His laundry list of cures he can’t get through Congress includes “school reform,” ‘‘job training” and “some investments in infrastructure” to “attract new businesses.”

Let’s talk “massive investments.”

In 2009, Obama and the Democrats rammed the $840 billion stimulus package through Capitol Hill under the guise of immediate job creation and economic recovery. An estimated $64 billion went to public-school districts; another nearly $50 billion went for other education spending.

This included $13 billion for low-income school kids; $4.1 billion for Head Start and child-care services; $650 million for educational technology; $200 million for working college students; and $70 million for homeless children.

Last week, economists from the St. Louis Federal Reserve surveyed more than 6,700 education-stimulus recipients and concluded that for every $1 million of stimulus grants to a district, a measly 1.5 jobs were created. “Moreover, all of this increase came in the form of nonteaching staff,” the report found.

More than three-quarters of the jobs “created or saved” in the first year of the stimulus were government jobs, while roughly 1 million private-sector jobs were forestalled or destroyed, according to Ohio State University.

Obama later admitted “there was no such thing” as “shovel-ready projects.” But there were plenty of pork-ready recipients, from green-energy billionaires to union bosses to Democratic campaign-finance bundlers.

About $230 billion was set aside for infrastructure, yet less than a year later, Obama was back asking for another $50 billion to pour down the infrastructure black hole.

In 2010, Obama signed the so-called Edujobs bill — a $26 billion political wealth-redistribution scheme paying back Big Labor for funding Democratic congressional campaigns.

In 2012, with bipartisan support, he signed the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act “to encourage startups and support our nation’s small businesses.”

In July 2014, he signed the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act to “help job-seekers access employment, education, training and support services to succeed in the labor market and to match employers with the skilled workers they need to compete in the global economy.”

(Never mind that a Government Accountability Office review of the feds’ existing 47 job-training programs run by nine different agencies “generally found the effects of participation were not consistent across programs, with only some demonstrating positive impacts that tended to be small, inconclusive or restricted to short-term impacts.”)

In December 2014, the White House unveiled nearly $1 billion in new “investments” to “expand access to high-quality early-childhood education to every child in America” from “birth and continuing to age 5.”

That’s all on top of the $6 billion government-funded national-service and education initiative known as the SERVE America Act, enacted less than a month after the nearly $1 trillion stimulus.

The act included $1.1 billion to increase the investment in national-service opportunities; $97 million for Learn and Serve America Youth Engagement Zones; and nearly $400 million for the Social Innovation Fund and Volunteer Generation Fund.

The “social innovation” slush fund was intended to “create new knowledge about how to solve social challenges in the areas of economic opportunity, youth development and school support, and healthy futures, and to improve our nation’s problem-solving infrastructure in low-income communities.” The biggest beneficiaries? Obama’s progressive cronies.

Apparently, the richly funded “social innovators” haven’t reached the looter-prone neighborhoods of Baltimore yet. But it’s not ideologically bankrupt Obama’s fault.

It’s ours.