As the scrappy, resourceful relative to its prima donna cousin, corn, wheat can sometimes get short shrift when it comes to crop management. The wheat yield contest was designed to show that when farmers take time to scout and apply fertilizer, nutrients, fungicides and insecticides at just the right time, the crop shines.

Even after supplementing his winter wheat with nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and sulfur, based on carefully timed tissue and soil tests, Gross was astonished at the kernels from his winning winter wheat field.

"The kernel size was just huge -- they were humongous and heavy," he said. "You could take two or three small or semi-filled kernels and fit them in the same area as these big, plump ones. That was a pleasant surprise."

Nor did the quality suffer; the field's milling characteristics were excellent and protein held to a respectable 11.8.

Like Gross, the contest's other national yield winners are devoted to their wheat fields. "When that crop asks for something, be prepared," said Carroll, of his Oregon spring wheat fields. "It's going to talk to you; you just have to listen."

Carroll "listens" via biweekly petiole tissue tests during the growing season. If the petioles say they need micronutrients, he runs that through his sprayer and applies it to the foliage. This year, his winning field got liquid cow manure in the fall, on top of nutrients and fungicide in the spring.

Scouting is a chore to some, but not to Wert, who grows spring wheat in North Dakota.

"What I love to do is walk my fields," he said. "It's my favorite thing to do all summer." That diligence allowed him to knock down weeds like kochia and wild oats promptly, stave off disease with multiple fungicide passes and save on insecticide this year -- and win best dryland spring wheat yield in the country.

IT ALWAYS COMES DOWN TO WATER

The wheat contest draws applicants from all over the country -- from the Pacific Northwest to the Dakotas and down to the southern Great Plains.

But each winner interviewed scarcely hesitated when asked what the biggest challenge for their winning wheat fields was: water.

Some, like Gross and Carroll, have aquifers lurking under their fields to feed pivots; others, like Wert, depend on unpredictable rainfall from the skies.

This year, Wert's North Dakota dryland spring wheat fields were helped along by good soil moisture in the spring, and an unusually wet June. But when the big spigot in the sky turned off on July 2, and no more rain fell before harvest, Wert credits his family's four-decade devotion to no-till with nursing the bin-buster crop along.

"No-till absolutely helps hold moisture in the soil," he said. "North Dakota State University says you can see five to seven bushels produced with every inch of rainfall, so when we're a couple inches short, that extra soil moisture makes a big difference."

Even the majority of Gross' irrigated winter wheat fields have sparse access to water.

The Odessa Aquifer his operation pulls from is dropping lower every year, and the region's farmers have state-regulated water meters tracking and limiting their water use.

"Farmers here are actually preserving their water for high-value crops such as potatoes and onions," Gross said. "Wheat, which is a rotation crop for us, just gets what's left over."

For Carroll, the timing of his irrigation water is his most important wheat management tool. "Water usage at flowering time will make or break a wheat kernel," he said.

His soils turn to sand about 2.5 feet down, so Carroll can't depend on soil moisture storage to feed the wheat plant at flowering, and like Gross, he has a meter-limited water supply.

"When the wheat is just starting to flower, you have to make sure the moisture profile is full," he said. "You have to walk out for days and watch ahead of time."

A DATA BONANZA

The decision to test wheat entries for quality components this year added a lot of work for the contest organizers. But Joehl expects it to pay huge dividends in the years to come.

"What's unique about this contest is farmers have to put down every little management practice -- planting date, fertility, variety, and more," he explained. "So every sample we have -- and its quality results -- is correlated to those management practices."

In just a few years, the contest should be able to use that aggregated data to make interesting conclusions on how each management practice affects crucial milling and baking characteristics like protein and falling number, Joehl said.

"That's a lot of data power," he said.

Those results will be a welcome source of information both to contestants and the larger wheat industry, said Gross.

"I hope it will really encourage growers to focus more on quality and not just yield by itself," he said. "Wheat acres are really dwindling and in order to keep the markets we do have, we need to make sure that our buyers know that they're getting a premium quality."

You can find more details on the National Wheat Yield Contest and its winners from NWF here: https://wheatfoundation.org/….

**

Editor's Note: DTN/The Progressive Farmer is the official publication of the National Wheat Yield Contest. Look for more coverage of the 2018 contest and its winners in the March issue of The Progressive Farmer.

Emily Unglesbee can be reached at Emily.unglesbee@dtn.com

Follow her on Twitter @Emily_Unglesbe

(PS/AG)

© Copyright 2018 DTN/The Progressive Farmer. All rights reserved.