Cynthia Nixon, during a recent speech to a group of gay individuals, made some controversial remarks by asserting that, for her, homosexuality was a choice. Understandably this has caused quite a bit of an uproar amongst lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender activists. Many LGBT organizations base their rhetoric around the idea that sexual orientation is not a choice and in the immortal words of the one Miss Lady of Gaga, we were all “born this way”. Many are concerned that if the general public believes that homosexuality is a choice, then one may opt out of or be “cured” of their choice.

Nixon’s statement seems to be in direct contrast to a core belief of homosexuality that it is biologically inherent and therefore not a choice. Or is it? The beauty of sexuality is that we are all individually different and unique and have the opportunity to define that sexuality for ourselves. According to Nixon:

“I say it doesn’t matter if we flew here or we swam here, it matters that we are here and we are one group and let us stop trying to make a litmus test for who is considered gay and who is not.”

I feel that Nixon is touching upon a new perception of sexuality; one not dependent upon concretely defined labels. This may prove uncomfortable for some but perhaps also liberating for others. I don’t think that Nixon is single-handedly dismantling the ardent efforts of activists both past and present, but instead is a different voice/perspective to add to the discourse. Research has shown that one’s sexuality is a fluid entity that is constantly shifting and evolving. Our views, tastes and desires may change due to a number of life circumstances – relationships, loss, children, and economic status.

What are your thoughts? Are Nixon’s comments harmful to the cause and representation of LGBT people or are her remarks fair and sound?