Twitter bans Milo, and Molyneux and Cernovich are on it:

Freedomain Radio is 100% funded by viewers like you. Please support the show by signing up for a monthly subscription or making a one time donation at: http://www.freedomainradio.com/donate

It is time we call on President Trump to add political ideological orientation to the list of human qualities which cannot be discriminated against under federal law.

Like sexual orientation and race, ideological orientation is biologically rooted, as has been demonstrated through both genetic studies and physical, volumetric MRI analyses of living ideologue’s brains. Ideological orientation is not a conscious decision, but rather a way we are born. Discriminating against us over our ideological orientation, the very personalities that define our nature and who we are as people, is wrong.

More over, I believe any court in the land, presented with this evidence, would have to rule in our favor, given the similarity in biological origins between protected qualities like sexual orientation, race, and political orientation. Indeed the evidence linking homosexuality to genetics is far weaker than the evidence linking ideological orientation to one’s underlying genetics. We have less choice over our ideological orientation, and the evidence for its biological roots is stronger.

As Milo’s Twitter ban shows, conservatives are being discriminated against by private sector businesses just as homosexuals were discriminated against by bakery owners who refused to do business with them. Liberals don’t like us because of the way we are born, they create caricatures of us, and then they discriminate against us just as blacks and gays were discriminated in the past. If a bakery can be forced to bake a cake for individuals who engage in behaviors they are repulsed by, I think Twitter should be subject to legal punishment for not doing business with Milo due to his biologically rooted political orientation – especially the negative effects such discrimination will have on Milo’s economic status.

If Twitter wishes to argue that they are denying service for some other reason, it should be taken to the courts, preferably in a conservative legal jurisdiction, with Milo’s attorney examining previous cases, such as #blacklivesmatter leaders calling for violence against police officers and not being treated similarly. If unequal treatment were proven, then Twitter should be subjected to the same legal treatment as any business which illegally discriminated against someone for reasons of race or sexual orientation.

In a court of law, the facts clearly support a case for discrimination based on physiological traits we are born with. I think the Supreme Court would have no choice but to rule for Milo.

This is the final frontier in civil rights and anti-discrimination law. We demand equality, and equal treatment under the law, and we are going to get it.

All we need now is the support of President Trump.