205 Shares Reddit 133 Email

My time of late has been spent researching three main topics; Uranium One, White Nationalism and ObamaGate. The last refers to the crimes committed by the Obama administration in the run up to the 2016 election and continuing on to today. My research is internet based and I like to cite my sources whenever possible as a means of letting others check my work. DAG Rosenstein’s congressional testimony on December 13th made for a busy day. While doing more reseach, a “brainstorm” caused me to unleash a Twitter thread that forms the bulk of this piece (if you find it worth sharing with others, please retweet it yourself). In presenting it here, it may seem dramatic but lets review “Why 11/17/16 May Be The Day One Admiral Saved Our Republic“.

PolAgnostic on Twitter 1. OIG’s investigation began in January. Someone REALLY important gave OIG incontrovertible proof there was a soft coup conspiracy in the DOJ & FBI against President Trump. That someone important was Mike Rogers, NSA Director. @instapundit @SharylAttkisson https://t.co/Jh5xtTIxhB

2. NSA already had the text messages between Strzok and Page when Rogers made an unapproved visit to Trump Tower on 11/172016. There were reports the Obama administration wanted to FIRE Rogers less than two days later for not clearing the meeting with Obama. https://t.co/1tDEwrfRuW — PolAgnostic (@PolAgnostic) December 14, 2017

3. Peter Strzok's naïve belief that his phone was secure has been proved wrong. He should have paid more attention to Snowden's revelations. The NSA can penetrate any device, any system, any software … ANYWHERE in the world.@instapundit @SharylAttkisson https://t.co/8Ov2QdfjRW — PolAgnostic (@PolAgnostic) December 14, 2017

4. Mike Rogers has spent decades protecting this country against "all enemies, foreign and domestic" and he wasn't going to fail in that oath. If he had asked approval or even given notice he was meeting with Trump, Obama could have denied it and ordered him not to go. https://t.co/eNTinHp7Bo — PolAgnostic (@PolAgnostic) December 14, 2017

5. Because the NSA Director had information not just about Strzok, Page, FBI & DOJ officials – he had information on everyone who had bought into the soft coup – no matter who or what device they used to "stay off the radar".@instapundit @SharylAttkisson https://t.co/0KWdR4kKif — PolAgnostic (@PolAgnostic) December 14, 2017

6. The Steele Dossier had been in play for months. Strzok had used it to get a FISA warrant for surveillance of Trump and his associates BY the NSA. There isn't a FISA warrant the NSA Director is not aware of in all of its aspects. https://t.co/8Q1aPIFayg — PolAgnostic (@PolAgnostic) December 14, 2017

7. Here he had the 2nd in charge of counter intelligence at the FBI setting the highest level tools of the IC community to SPY on the candidate of the opposing party while the campaign was STILL underway.@instapundit @SharylAttkisson https://t.co/T1vVhoWY2r — PolAgnostic (@PolAgnostic) December 14, 2017

8. If only to protect the NSA and its mission, he had a duty to find out HOW this had been taken to a level certain to cause the biggest political scandal in the history of the U.S. – It certainly WASN'T something a third tier flunky (Strzok) initiates on his own. https://t.co/tjXecWR4cI — PolAgnostic (@PolAgnostic) December 14, 2017

9. What the NSA uncovered was WHY Obama was redrafting the EO to allow "wide dissemination" throughout the govt of national security information which had been tightly held throughout Obama's 8 years

Suddenly, it was a good idea to let anyone see it?@instapundit @SharylAttkisson https://t.co/57U4Ooqd2d — PolAgnostic (@PolAgnostic) December 14, 2017

10. Strzok's "insurance policy" grew into a broad conspiracy to overturn the election results. The Obama administration had always been cult like but now it had morphed into open sedition & direct violation of the oaths of many highly placed people throughout the govt. https://t.co/8jhbE2WaNH — PolAgnostic (@PolAgnostic) December 14, 2017

11. This soft coup was unfolding while the Trump administration was filling the top positions for a new admin. Why are there s many generals in the Trump administration? They know they can TRUST one another. They've worked together for decades.@instapundit @SharylAttkisson https://t.co/NkgnrwMude — PolAgnostic (@PolAgnostic) December 14, 2017

12. Real military professionals DESPISE the politicians in their ranks. The generals joining Trump's team were NOT politicians. They are some of the best generals in our history. They have virtually NO interest in "playing politics". Unlike so many of those coming to DC. https://t.co/l9m8PiTJ88 — PolAgnostic (@PolAgnostic) December 14, 2017

13. This means some of the people Trump appointed were known to be part of the coup conspiracy. It is, to say the least, another level of complexity to incorporate "snakes" into your staffing plans. The OIG was already watching people with NSA "help"@instapundit @SharylAttkisson https://t.co/K8Ctfk7IE1 — PolAgnostic (@PolAgnostic) December 14, 2017

14. And, for 11 months, the "watchers" and the "listeners" have been able to track the conspiracy unfolding and growing while more "true believers" in Congress and the mainstream media signed up to play their part in overturning the election. https://t.co/hq05oBh2gt — PolAgnostic (@PolAgnostic) December 14, 2017

15. Who are the "bad guys"? Who are the "good guys"? I think you need a special roster from Mike Rogers to be able to be certain who falls into which camp. Some of the bad guys are being identified. some of the good guys are known … and PISSED OFF!@instapundit @SharylAttkisson https://t.co/9UjdGVS1yU — PolAgnostic (@PolAgnostic) December 14, 2017

16. The MSM exists to distract you and lie to you. The most important thing said today that I nearly missed was the announcement by Rep. Goodlatte that the OIG's report would be completed by Jan 15, 2018 and total more than 1.2 million pages. Mark your calendars. https://t.co/pUYquF2f0C — PolAgnostic (@PolAgnostic) December 14, 2017

17. On Dec 18th, Twitter's new T&C's go into effect. If you DON'T agree to let Twitter monitor EVERYTHING you look at on the internet, they are going to lock your acct. If you do agree & they don't like what you look at or say, they'll lock your acct@instapundit @SharylAttkisson https://t.co/7f3in8PsSx — PolAgnostic (@PolAgnostic) December 14, 2017

18. I have already established my PolAgnostic account on gab.ai because I REALLY don't like Nazi's which means I can't agree to Twitter's new T&C's. I suggest everyone else do the same. Good night. https://t.co/MkGEai0aWZ — PolAgnostic (@PolAgnostic) December 14, 2017

My Gab link: https://gab.ai/PolAgnostic

Admiral Mike Rogers came under attack by the Obama administration via the mainstream media less than two days after meeting with President-elect Trump. The NPR interview linked in tweet 1 is just one example. On 11/18/16, Trump and his transition team moved their efforts to his golf club in New Jersey – outside the reach of the FISA warrant granted in October.

What I’ve noticed over the last two months is that every time Mueller’s team leaks something or the MSM launches a new “RUSSIA!” attack, Trump has an immediate counter punch that up ends knocking whoever it may be on their ass.

It wasn’t until DAG Rosenstein’s testimony that many of the bits and pieces I’ve been chasing for months began to gel; the catalyst was Rosenstein’s bitter observation, “The OIG has 500 people and a budget of $ 100 million.”

Late last night, it all came together: Why did the OIG start investigating in January? Who had the reputation & ability to gather evidence of corruption within the DOJ?

When you ask the right question, the likely answer is usually obvious. There is one individual who has access to everything everyone else is doing or saying.

While I have deep reservations regarding FISA, if what I’ve laid out here is anywhere close to accurate, it may worth having an agency with that much power … as long as the person heading it is incorruptible.

If what I have laid out here is accurate in regards to Rogers and the NSA – it should never be publicly acknowledged.

.

.

.

Addendum:

My intent is to add links in this section which relate to specific items above. I haven’t put in everything I currently have because it would confuse rather than clarify. Where I feel something adds clarity, I’ll add it with a brief comment.

Item 7: Released the day before this article will post, this tweet from Sara Carter provides background on just how corrupt the FBI has become in using the NSA systems illegally.