I saw the numbers "G910" and was like, nice, they actually are making a new G9x with 3366 sensor....then was like oh...it's a keyboard. I had the original G15 keyboard and think I actually liked the keys on that better than the vast majority of mechanical keyboards, so Logitech does make decent keyboards. I would prefer they made a bare bones gaming keyboard because I probably wouldn't use any of the ones they currently make.<br><br>

For me personally, things I do not want to see in a keyboard:<br><br>

1) <b>A keyboard with a USB polling rate over 125hz</b> - too much strain on the USB I/O having multiple 1000hz devices polling on your system. I just tested the difference between a 125hz and 1000hz keyboard yesterday. The 1000hz polling rate keyboard not only dulls down mouse response, but also causes field of view pans in first person games to be less smooth. The only way you could prevent this issue is possibly plugging the keyboard into the USB 3 controller, then the mouse into the EHCI, but that might not even help. I haven't tried it since any gaming PC shouldn't have USB 3 turned on in the first place.<br><br>

2) <b>An iPhone hub</b> - I have no idea if or what kind of problems plugging an iPhone hub into my computer is going to give me, and I have no desire to find out.<br><br>

3) <b>A keyboard with a USB hub built into it</b> - Plugging a hub into another hub. Is this really a good idea? Even if the act of plugging the hub into another hub on your computer doesn't create any problem, plugging a device in through daisy chained hubs probably won't work as well as just plugging it into your PC.<br><br>

4) <b>A keyboard that can only connect via USB and doesn't have the PS/2 option also</b> - No reason to cut PS/2 support just to give USB mode 100 key rollover.<br><br>

Gaming devices shouldn't take any chances at having issues that can hinder performance. They need to scrap the keyboards with weird stuff built into them and just build a nice, cheap, bare bones, membrane keyboard using keys like the original G15 had, without the LCD screen, and sell it for $39.99.<br><br>

But the million dollar question. I only owned the 3600 DPI G400, so I didn't test the 4000 ROM of that particular mouse, but many people claimed the X & Y axis sensitivity was different on it. How could that issue possibly have gotten through the millions of dollars in testing equipment in the pictures?