Second, Mr McDonnell repeatedly stated in 2003 that the violence used by the IRA was tragic but necessary. He told The Sun: “Because of the bravery of the IRA and people like Bobby Sands we now have a peace process.” He said in his notorious speech: “the bombs and bullets… brought Britain to the negotiating table”. And he wrote in his column: “republicans had the right to honour those who had brought about this process of negotiation which had led to peace.” Again, does Mr McDonnell still believe this is true? Does he sincerely think that the use of “bombs and bullets” against an occupying force was what led to negotiation and, eventually peace? If he doesn’t believe these things, if he thinks the IRA’s campaign was totally illegitimate and unnecessary and for a false cause, let him please say it. Until he does, unionists will likely look upon the prospect of any Labour government containing John McDonnell with concern. Especially given the parlous state of Stormont.