Pro



https://jesterscourt.cc...

https://toinformistoinfluence.com...



Since the Rachel stalker has been unrepentant even after a court case which he pleaded guilty to stalking charges, should sulphuric acid be used against criminal stalker Rachel Marsden by her victims, in order to stop her madness which includes stalking others? Report this Argument Here's proofs that Rachel Marsden is a criminal stalker:Since the Rachel stalker has been unrepentant even after a court case which he pleaded guilty to stalking charges, should sulphuric acid be used against criminal stalker Rachel Marsden by her victims, in order to stop her madness which includes stalking others? Con NO.

The death penalty is allready a horrific wrong, but burning someone with sulphuric acid? That is wrong.

I was once part of an anarchist group who used acid bombs (Resin bottles full of sulphuric acid) and, i was once damaged by one. It is a pain unbearable. The people may of been effected by her, but they do not gain a rite to burn her with sulphuric acid. Report this Argument

Pro



According to the links which we had given to you, Rachel Marsden is a sick psychopath who had stalked numerous men, online or offline, and often use sexual provocative words in her abuse.



There is a scientific research which shows that psychological abuse alone, which is the abuse type that is catered by the criminal stalker, is more traumatic than physical abuse, which is featured in the news that has the link below:

http://www.seeker.com...



Due to the fact that Rachel is a famous stalker who had once appeared as a FOX news anchor before being booted out from it, we're afraid that if Rachel is being let free by relapsing into her stalking habits, according to the broken windows theory, this will set an example for other potential stalkers and even pedophiles out there that they can stalk others and go scots free if they have sufficient power, fame and money.



We, which are a branch of the Anonymous group, chose to believe that the necessary evil principle is applicable in this case. Unless the relevant authorities woke up and use restraining orders to stop her sexual stalking rampages, the only ways that we could do to stop her is by spread her dox and possibly have her stalking victims to use sulphuric acid against her as a last resort. We do not intent to murder Rachel Marsden, but to leave an everlasting reminder for her to not relapse again. There should be a clear warning for stalkers like Rachel out there. Report this Argument We may chose to disagree with you in this case.According to the links which we had given to you, Rachel Marsden is a sick psychopath who had stalked numerous men, online or offline, and often use sexual provocative words in her abuse.There is a scientific research which shows that psychological abuse alone, which is the abuse type that is catered by the criminal stalker, is more traumatic than physical abuse, which is featured in the news that has the link below:Due to the fact that Rachel is a famous stalker who had once appeared as a FOX news anchor before being booted out from it, we're afraid that if Rachel is being let free by relapsing into her stalking habits, according to the broken windows theory, this will set an example for other potential stalkers and even pedophiles out there that they can stalk others and go scots free if they have sufficient power, fame and money.We, which are a branch of the Anonymous group, chose to believe that the necessary evil principle is applicable in this case. Unless the relevant authorities woke up and use restraining orders to stop her sexual stalking rampages, the only ways that we could do to stop her is by spread her dox and possibly have her stalking victims to use sulphuric acid against her as a last resort. We do not intent to murder Rachel Marsden, but to leave an everlasting reminder for her to not relapse again. There should be a clear warning for stalkers like Rachel out there. Con Okay. But Rachel has not used Sulphuric Acid upon a victim of hers, so why should she have to go through it herself? My answer to this is physiological torture. Have Rachel experience what she has done to her victims, and she will surely realise what she has done. And also, what is acid going to do? In my opinion, it would just make her more angry, enfuriating her to do worse. Its not a resonable answer. Report this Argument