Owners can alter software without breaching carmakers’ intellectual property rights, says Library of Congress, though any changes must not break law

It's OK to hack your own car, US copyright authorities rule

Car owners and security experts can tinker with automobile software without incurring US copyright liability, according to newly issued guidelines that were opposed by the auto industry.



The Library of Congress, which oversees the US Copyright Office, agreed with fair use advocates who argued that vehicle owners are entitled to modify their cars, which often involves altering software.

What it was like to have Tesla's autopilot robot drive me hundreds of miles Read more

Automakers including General Motors and other vehicle manufacturers such as Deere & Co opposed the rules. They said vehicle owners could visit authorized repair shops for changes they may need to undertake.

However US copyright officials decided that altering computer programs for vehicle repair or modification may not infringe a manufacturer’s software copyright.

A GM representative referred to a statement from an industry group that said the new rules would weaken safety innovation.

“Sensitive vehicle data could be easily manipulated, altered, or distributed – undetected – if these changes are implemented,” the statement said.

Deere spokesman Ken Golden said the company stood by its earlier opposition. Some systems that transmit data from the vehicle to Deere could still be protected by copyright, Golden said.

Security researchers also pushed for copyright liability protection because computer programs are “pervasive” in modern machines and devices, including vehicles, home appliances and medical devices.

“We are pleased that analysts will now be able to examine the software in the cars we drive without facing legal threats from car manufacturers,” said Kit Wilson, a staff attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which advocated for the rule changes.

The new rules must be renewed in three years, Wilson said. Vehicle owners still could perform other activities that would violate an automaker’s copyright, he said, like extracting programming code and selling it.

Some US government agencies expressed serious reservations about the new rules and the Environmental Protection Agency flatly opposed them.

“EPA explained that vehicle modifications are often performed to increase engine power or boost fuel economy, but that these modifications increase vehicle emissions and thus violate the Clean Air Act,” the Library of Congress said in its final rule.

However the new rules did not allow vehicle owners to break any other laws, the library said, and would not take effect for a year, so the EPA and other agencies would have time to prepare.