Tensions in the House Democratic Caucus are spilling into the open over how to address dismal conditions at migrant detention centers on the border.

Progressives are angry with centrists and Speaker Nancy Pelosi Nancy PelosiPelosi slams Trump executive order on pre-existing conditions: It 'isn't worth the paper it's signed on' On The Money: Anxious Democrats push for vote on COVID-19 aid | Pelosi, Mnuchin ready to restart talks | Weekly jobless claims increase | Senate treads close to shutdown deadline Trump signs largely symbolic pre-existing conditions order amid lawsuit MORE (D-Calif.) for the decision to move a $4.6 billion emergency funding bill already passed by the Senate through the House.

ADVERTISEMENT

The bill, passed at the end of June before lawmakers went on their July 4 recess, provided funds to run migrant shelters, but liberals argue the legislation did not impose tough enough rules to ensure migrants are fed and sheltered at a reasonable standard.

Rep. Raúl Grijalva (D-Ariz.), a former co-chairman of the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC), told The Hill that taking up the Senate version of the bill was “a mistake.”

“By not being firm enough with [the Department of Homeland Security] ... you continue to weaponize that department to serve Trump and Trump only,” said Grijalva, chairman of the House Natural Resources Committee.

Frictions between Pelosi and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Alexandria Ocasio-CortezOn The Money: Anxious Democrats push for vote on COVID-19 aid | Pelosi, Mnuchin ready to restart talks | Weekly jobless claims increase | Senate treads close to shutdown deadline McCarthy says there will be a peaceful transition if Biden wins Anxious Democrats amp up pressure for vote on COVID-19 aid MORE (D-N.Y.) also have come to the forefront over the bill.

In an interview with New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd published over the weekend, Pelosi shrugged off criticism of the funding bill from Ocasio-Cortez and three of her strongest allies, Reps. Ilhan Omar Ilhan OmarOmar fires back at Trump over rally remarks: 'This is my country' Trump attacks Omar for criticizing US: 'How did you do where you came from?' Democrats scramble on COVID-19 relief amid division, Trump surprise MORE (D-Minn.), Rashida Tlaib Rashida Harbi TlaibTrump attacks Omar for criticizing US: 'How did you do where you came from?' George Conway: 'Trump is like a practical joke that got out of hand' Pelosi endorses Kennedy in Massachusetts Senate primary challenge MORE (D-Mich.) and Ayanna Pressley Ayanna PressleyFauci, Black Lives Matter founders included on Time's 100 Most Influential People list Trump attacks Omar for criticizing US: 'How did you do where you came from?' Pressley applauded on House floor after moving speech on living with alopecia MORE (D-Mass.).

“All these people have their public whatever and their Twitter world,” said Pelosi. “But they didn’t have any following. They’re four people and that’s how many votes they got.”

Ocasio-Cortez returned fire over Twitter, writing “that public ‘whatever’ is called public sentiment.”

And the Progressive Change Campaign Committee on Monday launched a fundraising effort slamming Pelosi’s criticism of Ocasio-Cortez.

Pelosi in the interview defended her decision to bring the Senate bill to the floor. Seventy-one Democrats, mostly progressives, voted against the legislation in a 322-85 vote. Only 14 Republicans voted “no.”

She blamed Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell Addison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellTrump 'no longer angry' at Romney because of Supreme Court stance On The Money: Anxious Democrats push for vote on COVID-19 aid | Pelosi, Mnuchin ready to restart talks | Weekly jobless claims increase | Senate treads close to shutdown deadline The Hill's Campaign Report: Trump faces backlash after not committing to peaceful transition of power MORE (R-Ky.), saying he wouldn’t have allowed a vote in the Senate on legislation that included tougher requirements for the treatment of people held in detention centers.

In a “Dear Colleague” letter sent to House Democrats on Monday, Pelosi said the caucus’s top priorities would be improving detention center conditions and preventing the Trump administration from adding a citizenship question to the decennial census.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Whether or not the President responds to our request to improve medical care standards for the health and safety of children, and while Senator McConnell still refuses to help the children suffering in these deplorable conditions, we must lead a Battle Cry across America to protect the children,” wrote Pelosi.

She also endorsed a bill introduced by Rep. Veronica Escobar Veronica EscobarHispanic caucus report takes stock of accomplishments with eye toward 2021 Races heat up for House leadership posts Ahead of a coronavirus vaccine, Mexico's drug pricing to have far-reaching impacts on Americans MORE (D-Texas) that would require better training for agents at detention centers.

Grijalva and other progressives are also angry with the bipartisan Problem Solvers Caucus, a coalition of moderate Republicans and Democrats who have signed a pledge to vote together on issues where 75 percent of the group, and 51 percent of both the Republicans and Democrats in the group, agree.

Progressives see the Problem Solvers as obstructionist, despite the group’s stated ambition to untangle political knots.

“The problem with the Problem Solvers is they’ve made triangulation an art form,” said Grijalva. “In action, [they’re] dominated by the Republican agenda.”

Rep. Josh Gottheimer Joshua (Josh) GottheimerVulnerable Democrats tell Pelosi COVID-19 compromise 'essential' Centrist House group offers bipartisan COVID-19 relief deal Hillicon Valley: Lawmakers introduce resolution condemning QAnon | US Cyber Command leader vows to 'defend forward' in protecting nation from cyberattacks MORE (D-N.J.), a co-chairman of the Problem Solvers Caucus, told The Hill in an interview that getting a bill passed and signed into law quickly was important for the emergency border supplemental.

“On that particular issue, obviously, part of why many of us felt it was essential that we actually pass legislation is we had to get immediate humanitarian aid to children and not delay,” said Gottheimer.

Gottheimer said the fact that the bill was passed with a large majority showed it was smart to move the Senate version and get help to people at the facilities quickly.

“To walk away without delivering humanitarian aid to children was just unconscionable. So that was what guided my decision. And I think now, on the bigger picture, we’ve got to get comprehensive reform done,” added Gottheimer.

But progressives say Gottheimer and other Democrats who backed the bill were doing the bidding of McConnell and the Trump administration. They argue Democrats should have stuck together and used their leverage to win a stronger bill. And they are stung by the fact that more Democrats opposed the bill on the floor than House Republicans.

CPC Co-Chairman Mark Pocan Mark William PocanOvernight Defense: Nearly 500 former national security officials formally back Biden | 40 groups call on House panel to investigate Pentagon's use of coronavirus funds 40 groups call on House panel to investigate Pentagon's use of coronavirus funds Overnight Defense: Pentagon redirects pandemic funding to defense contractors | US planning for full Afghanistan withdrawal by May | Anti-Trump GOP group puts ads in military papers MORE (D-Wis.) said the Problem Solvers’ push for the Senate bill could make it difficult to work with them in the future.

On Twitter, Pocan referred to the group as “the Child Abuse Caucus.”

“I mean, it’s just gonna be a lot harder for us to care enough to help deliver votes,” he said.

One Democratic lawmaker said there is talk of plans to slow down progress on Problem Solvers members’ bills during committee in the wake of their role in the passage of the Senate bill.

Progressives wield substantial power in the House legislative process.

CPC members chair many influential House committees, including Judiciary, Rules, Oversight and Reform, Homeland Security, Small Business and Natural Resources.

Grijalva warned Problem Solvers and other moderates who try to “thread the needle” to avoid partisan conflict on issues would ultimately have to face public opinion.

“They need to ‘thread’ lightly,” said Grijalva.

But the Natural Resources chairman dismissed the possibility of using the CPC’s chairmanships to exclude moderates from the legislative process.

“I don’t think pettiness is a strategy and I don’t think retribution is a strategy,” he said.