In an address given in September 1934 in Nuremberg, [Dr. Joseph Goebbels] said: “Good propaganda does not need to lie, indeed it may not lie. It has no reason to fear the truth. It is a mistake to believe that people cannot take the truth. They can. It is only a matter of presenting the truth to people in a way that they will be able to understand. A propaganda that lies proves that it has a bad cause. It cannot be successful in the long run.”

This quote is from Mark Weber’s article, Fraudulent Nazi Quotations, which I learned about from Zion Crime Factory when he quoted it in an interview on Prothink, prior to his betrayal by Mike Delaney and pals.

Ponder Goebbels’ quote while you read the rest of this piece and ask yourself why certain individuals, who are supposed to be our allies, so fear the truth.

In response to all the people, including myself, who have pointed out Mike Delaney’s and Andrew Anglin’s questionable behavior, Andrew has responded as I predicted: by claiming victimhood.

I will now pick apart Andrew’s article in order to explain what he’s really trying to convince you of, with his Jewish-style deceitful propaganda. With his LIES.

We must read between the lines. Here is a link to Andrew’s article.

I will summarize each paragraph with what I believe to be Andrew’s true meaning.

Let’s start with the title:

“Online Anonymity: Hasbara, Nihilistic Humor, A Coward’s Ego and the Ninth Circle of Internet Hell”

Andrew’s true meaning: Andrew’s goal here is to create an emotional reaction. In truth, he is saying the following: Anonymous allies who don’t wish to reveal their names or faces just yet are comparable to Hasbara and thus are enemies, perhaps even enemy Jews. Nihilists are bad, and so anonymous posters are also bad – that is the association you’re supposed to make. Anonymous posters are cowards with big egos, not to be trusted! This post is really important and scary and sensational, that’s why I, Andrew Anglin, ended the title with “Ninth Circle of Internet Hell”. That means you should really pay attention to this article, because it’s super entertaining!

“The Internet surely has many positives. We are able to speak freely and disseminate information about controversial topics and organize with like-minded individuals in a way which twenty years ago would have been impossible. However, there are a whole lot of negatives involved with this technology as well. One of the most massive issues our pro-White community is facing is the problem of online anonymity. “

Andrew’s true meaning: Platitude. Platitude. Platitude. Online allies are bad!

“Within the mass of anonymous members of this online network, we have four main groups: Jewish agents of either Hasbara or the JIDF, people who find causing dissension among internet groups to be humorous, faceless cowards who boost their small egos by acting out fantasies online, imitating macho behavior patterns they are incapable of acting out in real life, and finally people who are genuinely interested in finding the truth and doing something to save our people. Individuals from each of these groups are maintaining websites, posting in comments sections, chatting in chat rooms and contributing to forums.”

Andrew’s true meaning: Don’t trust anonymous posters! Only anonymous posters could possibly work toward Jewish interests. I, Andrew Anglin, cannot possibly harm the white nationalist movement, for I am not anonymous. Anonymous posters are all faceless cowards with a need to boost their small egos; they couldn’t possibly have the survival of our white race as their first and foremost priority. I, Andrew Anglin, a brave, virtuous white man, am interested in finding the truth and doing something to save our people. These evil anonymous contributors are maintaining websites, posting comments, sharing knowledge in chat rooms and contributing to forums – and they are pointing out my blatant hypocrisy and lack of insights, so I, Andrew Anglin, feel an unstoppable urge to censor their posts which point out the wrongs I and my buddies have committed. And thereafter I pledge to write articles where I make the claim that anyone who disagrees with me is a coward, in a passive-aggressive Jew-style attack, because I’m not actually man enough to allow critics to express their views and respond to them openly, honestly, and directly, like a man.

“Because of the almost ubiquitous anonymity, the total inability to tell who is who”

Andrew’s true meaning: “Total inability”, that means it’s really important, because we are so powerless to defend ourselves from anonymous posters who criticize us that we need to censor what they say, especially when it’s TRUE.

“all of this creates a unique type of hell.”

Andrew’s true meaning: I, Andrew Anglin, am a victim here, a victim of a hellish ordeal beyond words! I am an innocent victim under attack by heathens, demons who with their anonymous comments create for me a living hell on earth! Damn those evil anonymous posters who dare criticize me!

Let’s just take a look at a few more quotes from this masterpiece.

“those of us who are real, genuine people risk being swallowed by the noise, or drawn into the game.”

Andrew’s true meaning: Guys like myself, Andrew Anglin, who reveal our names and show our faces couldn’t POSSIBLY be agent provocateurs. Only anonymous bad people could POSSIBLY be “bad guys”. We are the genuine ones. Anonymous people are cowards. Guys like myself would NEVER bash valuable members of our community or engage in unscrupulous, cowardly censorship. We would NEVER get drawn into playing games with this movement.

“Let me note that I am not writing about this because I am foolish enough to think I can stop internet madness from happening.”

Andrew’s true meaning: Posters who don’t wish to reveal their names are “mad” AKA “crazy”. They couldn’t possibly contribute to discussion, they only know how to cause chaos and destruction. Scary!

“I will also offer that a possible solution to the problem of online anonymity is for people to stand up and be counted.”

Andrew’s true meaning: I, Andrew Anglin, demand that all anonymous posters who expose my hypocrisy, who DARE to call to attention unscrupulous anti-white behavior from my associates or from me, reveal their identities so that I may harass and mock them! Contributors couldn’t POSSIBLY have good reasons to remain anonymous, so ignore all the stuff I just said about all those evil pro-Jew anonymous agents around these parts. Our unnamed allies couldn’t POSSIBLY be worried that they’ll be targeted by the very same anonymous evil agents I’ve been trying to make you all terrified of this entire time. There’s absolutely no good reason allies should EVER remain anonymous, after all it’s not like white nationalists are ever targeted by Jews / the government for their views!

“After having observed this, I have come to believe that there are a number of Jews following a script, attacking anyone and everyone, and that those who read these comments often get caught up in this, responding to the agitators. “

Andrew’s true intention: Talk about subversive tactics Jews and our enemies truly DO use, and try to associate these actions, utterly falsely, with our anonymous allies who are being censored whenever they reveal Andrew’s or Mike’s hypocrisy. Apparently they’re all Jews, don’t you get it? Everyone who questions Andrew or Mike is a Jew and must be silenced!

“People have repeatedly accused myself and others of being Jews. They start arguments which have no purpose, attacking other commenters. Whatever their intent – it can never be definitively clear, given the nature of the thing – they will use a circular argumentative technique which can only serve the purpose of causing real people undue stress, causing them to waste time trying to prove a point to faceless, nameless cowards. “

Andrew’s true thinking: I must hide the fact that I’m really writing this piece because numerous individuals have correctly pointed out Mike Delaney’s inexcusable behavior and I have repeatedly censored their posts to hide this criticism, for I am fearful that they will realize the truth: I, Andrew Anglin, am not their ally. Therefore I must convince my readership that members of the community who disagree with me have said nothing they need to hear and it’s time to “move along now” for there is “nothing to see here”. By talking about these “anonymous cowards” I will convince people that EVERYONE I attack is an evil, anti-white provocateur, not just someone I disagree with and don’t want heard because the truth they speak of reveals my hypocrisy.

“Given this, I have decided to take a somewhat more aggressive stance against ‘trolling’ in general. It simply does not make sense to allow obvious agitators to take over the site and use it as their personal playground.”

Andrew’s true meaning: Given the recent attempts to criticize me, I will continue to enforce my comment policy: “I’ll delete anything I feel like, especially that which criticizes me or my associates, who are NOT to be held accountable! All who disagree with me are TROLLS!”

I think that’s enough for now. I can summarize the rest of Andrew’s post as more of the same: anyone who’s anonymous cannot be trusted, anyone who criticizes Andrew or his buddies for their repulsive behavior will be censored. Andrew will continue to go on creating attack pieces against anyone who dares hold him or Mike Delaney or the rest of his “crew” accountable, because he has something to hide.

Andrew goes on to talk about physiognomy, which I applaud. After all, I just wrote an article about how we need to judge people by their features and trust our instincts. Stealing ideas now are we Andrew? Reading my website, but refusing to even acknowledge your critics for fear that people will see the truth? Mmhm.

But let’s be clear, folks. It is certainly helpful to see a man’s face. And someday you will see mine, and you will see me for what I am: a good man. But you can also tell a great deal about someone from what they WRITE. I have shown you here today exactly what Andrew’s purpose in writing this piece was: To censor criticism of him and his friends, individuals who do NOT have our best interests in mind, and to shame posters who do not feel safe sharing their personal information into revealing themselves so that our enemies may target them. Good job, Andrew. You’re playing your part well.

Let me quote Andrew one more time, because this is key: “It simply does not make sense to allow obvious agitators to take over the site and use it as their personal playground.”

If that were the case, Andrew, why did you censor me on your website when I pointed out that Mike Delaney has been using OUR MOVEMENT as his personal playground? Why have you refused to respond to me directly, like a man? My comments section isn’t moderated like yours. I don’t fear discussion. I don’t fear the truth. You, on the other hand, are a coward. You DO fear the truth. You DO fear discussion. You refuse to even confront me openly and honestly in front of our peers. Don’t lie. Don’t claim it’s because I’m “anonymous”. You know as well as I do it’s because I CORRECTLY criticized your infallible leader, Mike Delaney, and I pointed out your own hypocrisy.

I know from experience- Guys like you who are so fearful of discussion, who are so fearful of truth, are NOT allies.

“Good propaganda does not need to lie, indeed it may not lie. It has no reason to fear the truth. It is a mistake to believe that people cannot take the truth. They can. It is only a matter of presenting the truth to people in a way that they will be able to understand. A propaganda that lies proves that it has a bad cause. It cannot be successful in the long run.” – Goebbels

