Gottfried Curio is an up-and-coming politician for the AfD (Alternative für Deutschland, Alternative for Germany). In the following video he discusses the ghastly anti-liberal aspects of Islamic religious education.

Nash Montana, who translated the video for subtitling, also includes this summary from Politically Incorrect:

Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:

Transcript:

0:04 Dear presidents, dear representatives,

0:07 Religion can bring peace, but it can also radicalize.

0:10 Certain statements, for example, in the Koran,

0:13 endowed with direct divine authority,

0:16 and the exact wording “immutable”,

0:19 create a legal conflict with our liberty-oriented democratic Constitution,

0:22 the penal code, and our education act.

0:25 Our minor students have to be safeguarded from this conflict.

0:28 The AfD therefore requests that the Senate ensure that

0:31 anti-Constitutional instruction in religious education

0:34 of all denominations is barred.

0:37 What is this mainly about?

0:40 First, it’s about the division of the world, anchored deeply

0:43 in the Koran, into believers and so-called unbelievers, which is a word

0:46 that does not belong in a religious education that supports integration,

0:49 this with the stipulation of bringing Islam

0:52 out of the existing ‘house of Islam’

0:55 and into the ‘house of war’, into the world of the ‘unbelievers’,

0:58 even with the use of violence.

1:01 Textual sample: “Kill them wherever you find them;

1:04 it is a duty to fight, he has sent his prophet

1:07 with the one true religion so that he may have victory over all the religions,

1:10 seize them and kill them wherever you may find them.

1:13 Don’t grow weak in the persecution of the unbelievers;

1:16 fight until all worship is directed towards Allah alone;

1:19 kill the heathens wherever you find them,

1:22 smite the necks and hack off the fingers of those

1:25 that are the unbelievers; down with them.”

1:28 Do we want this, endowed with divine authority,

1:31 to be conveyed by a person commanding respect

1:34 as does a teacher, to underage children?

1:37 We have 12- to 15-year-old perpetrators!

1:40 Dr Curio, will you grant a question by representative Kabek? —No.

1:43 Or, we also have intolerant, integration-hostile

1:46 religious discrimination, textual sample:

1:49 “Do not make friendships except with your own kind;

1:52 they will not hesitate to corrupt you and to wish your demise.

1:55 Do not take unbelievers as friends, do not take Jews

1:58 and Christians as friends, do not take my and your enemy for a friend.

2:01 Allah has cursed the unbelievers and he has

2:04 prepared the flames for them.” This exceeds sedition!

2:07 “Those that are unbelievers

2:10 are the most vile of all of creation, worse than…

2:13 – Dr. Curio will you grant a question by Herr Dr. Altug? —No.

2:16 Or by Herr Walther? —No.

2:19 Worse than cattle are those in the eyes of Allah who are unbelievers.

2:22 The Jews speak of Uzair (Ezra) as Allah’s son;

2:25 the Nazarenes speak of the Messiah as Allah’s son.

2:28 May Allah strike them dead!”

2:31 Do we want this to be imparted to our underage children?

2:34 Or, concerning the treatment of women, for example:

2:37 “If you fear that women are rebelling, you warn them,

2:40 then you avoid them in the marital bed, and beat them.

2:43 Your women are for you a fertile field, go to that fertile field

2:46 whenever and however you want.” Mind you,

2:49 the beating of women is not only permitted, but it is required,

2:52 as is equally the sexual objectification of women to be a fertile field,

2:55 including marital rape. Or is this all not meant in that way?

2:58 Yes it is. The Koran itself already has built in a ban

3:01 on the possibility of a relativizing interpretation of it. For instance,

3:04 “There is no one who may change the words of Allah…” — There is another request to pose

3:07 a question from Frau Güttler… —No. “There is no one who may change the words of Allah.

3:10 This is the book of Allah; there is no cause

3:13 to argue that anyone could change Allah’s words.”

3:16 With this it is clear, Euro-Islam or Democratic Islam…

3:19 I am asking again: there is another question,

3:22 should I in general not approve them? —In general! —OK…

3:25 …are political wishful thinking that cannot be made into reality,

3:28 because the Koran itself does not admit a reinterpretation of its words.

3:31 In no way is a verbatim understanding of the Koran

3:34 to be considered Islamism; no, it is the meaning the Koran itself that demands

3:37 it be applied Islam, and not without good reason.

3:40 In 2008 Erdogan said words to the effect that

3:43 there is no Islam and Islamism, there is only one Islam,

3:46 and whoever says anything different insults Islam.

3:49 This dichotomy in the world, the treatment of the unbelievers,

3:52 the violent global missions, these aren’t some historical stories.

3:55 No, they are instructions

3:58 of permanent validity,

4:01 because they are immutable due to divine authorship.

4:04 And this also how it is understood and lived

4:07 by the believers. For 55% of European Muslims

4:10 religious commandments are more important

4:13 than the law of the land. And Islamic representatives

4:16 confirm the contradiction to our Constitutional law in the

4:19 Cairo declaration of human rights, such as:

4:22 “There are no crimes and punishments except for those determined in the Shariah;

4:25 it is forbidden to take the life of another,” except, of course, when the Shariah demands it.

4:29 And Michael Müller (in Berlin) employs State Secretary Sawsan Chebli

4:32 who thinks that Shariah is compatible with our Constitution!

4:36 Teachers of religion are to be compelled

4:39 not to treat such texts

4:42 only respectfully with reference

4:45 to their unlawful contents!

4:48 Whoever does not adhere to this obligation

4:51 is breaking the law. Anis Amri learned

4:54 ‘Kill the unbelievers’. Should this be taught?