The Clooneys. “Humanitarians”. “Human rights activists”. In today’s vernacular, these terms are Newspeak. Newspeak is the term coined by George Orwell that “meet(s) the ideological requirements of English Socialism. Newspeak is a controlled language, of restricted grammar and limited vocabulary, meant to limit the freedom of thought—personal identity, self-expression, free will—that ideologically threatens the régime of Big Brother and the Party, who thus criminalized such concepts as thoughtcrime”. The “Big Brothers” here are the “global elite” who, for the past several decades, have attempted to install a worldwide socialist governing body via the UN. To do this, they needed a plan to eliminate national sovereignty while collecting the world’s wealth which became the “refugee” and “climate” crises perpetuate by continual war. The Clooneys “humanitarian” and human rights” initiatives are all covers for this plan.

There are nothing “humanitarian” or “human rights” oriented about the Clooneys As democrats do, they project onto their enemies that of which they are guilty reinforcing that message through their various pop culture platforms while behind the scenes partaking in these actions in direct violation of their public stance all to advance their goal of a one socialist government ruled planet. How the plan works:

use satellite technology to pinpoint locations on the planet where rich minerals and natural resources are in bountiful supply create an incident that gives the illusion of or exacerbates the “human rights violations” occurring, claim“regime change” as the only option “UN backed forces” enter to topple the dictator and instill a puppet, strip the land of resources, and leave behind a shithole claim the west is evil for raping third world countries of its resources and demand the western nations open their borders due to the “refugee crisis” they actually helped create take on the “humanitarian” mission of trafficking these people (especially children) all over the world and “educate” them as they see fit… as these “refugees” refuse to assimilate causing a disturbance in the western nations that will eventually create a “humanitarian” situation that requires UN “intervention”in the western nations…

Repeat the cycle until all borders are erased, and the UN is in charge. This is why we now have “climate refugees”. From George’s The Sentry and Satellite Sentinel projects to 9/11, Iraq and Libya to South Sudan and Syria to their position as figureheads to Obama’s UN Refugee Resettlement Program and the Prince’s Trust to their “education” initiatives with the Catholic Church, George and Amal Clooney are everything about which Orwell and Joe McCarthy tried to warn us. The Clooneys are enemies of democracy.

The Responsibility to Protect

The same people and money behind the perpetual war to keep the Clooney cycle of humanitarian fraud in motion are “allowed” to do so based on a UN doctrine called the “Responsibility to Protect”. The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) was adopted by a UN World Summit in September of 2005. The first country-specific resolution to which this doctrine was referred by the UN was Darfur in 2006 led publicly by “human rights” activist George Clooney. According to “George Clooney’s War: The Filmstar’s Activism in Sudan”, “A UN World Summit in 2005 adopted humanitarian intervention – the ‘Responsibility to Protect’, or R2P – as official UN doctrine. R2P enshrined in international law both the reason and duty for humanitarian intervention. A nation would henceforth forfeit its sovereignty if it committed or was unable to prevent massive human rights abuses on its soil. In such circumstances, the outside world could, and must, take action to stem the disaster through diplomacy, sanctions or, if needed, military force.” The “R2P” calls for the use of a global police force as needed as determined by the UN. To clarify the current legal status of a particular aspect of the “Responsibility to Protect” principle—“the idea that bystander states have a collective responsibility to protect populations beyond borders from mass atrocities when host states fail to do so. It outlines the development of this idea and argues that, while the legal force of key international statements on the ‘Responsibility to Protect’ principle may be weak at best, the International Court of Justice and the International Law Commission have offered bold declarations in recent years which do point towards the gradual development of legal duties for the extraterritorial protection of populations.” In effect, if the UN does not like the way a country is being run (or if it determines there are minerals in there worthy of pursuing), it can claim it has a “responsibility to protect” it’s citizens from themselves and their government by suspending its “sovereignty/borders and implementing regime change. “Sovereignty”, “democracy”, “human rights”….this is Newspeak language manipulation to appeal to the emotion of low informed voters to justify their wrongdoings.

The International Court of Justice (ICJ)/Criminal Court (ICC)

The International Court of “Justice” leads to the International Criminal Court. This is where the deposed “human rights violators” are tried by the same people who deposed the leader Can there be a “fair” trial with this seemingly implicit bias? Regardless, the Newspeak of the term “war crimes” then becomes problematic. It has at times been indiscriminately used by various U.N.-backed international bodies, including the International Criminal Court, or ICC, for politically motivated prosecutions. Consider the politicization of the United Nations Human Rights Council (UMHRC), which was established on March 15, 2006 to replace the UN Commission on Human Rights (UNCHR) because it had come under attack for allowing countries with poor human rights records to be members. Changing the name did not fix the problem The problem has only gotten worse. Consider these members: Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Venezuela, China, Cuba, Iraq, Burundi, UAE, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Angola, Cuba…the council is made up of some of the worst violators of human rights in the world. Talk about projection. These countries are in charge of prosecuting “war crimes” in the ICC?

Right now Israeli is in the crosshairs for “anti-terror” operations in the Gaza Strip. Who was asked to serve on one of those panels in 2014? Amal Clooney, whose job is to present cases before the ICC, was asked to serve on a panel to investigate Israel’s supposed “war crimes” in Gaza. She agreed at first but then abruptly pulled out just before their wedding in September of 2014. The UN assault on Israel has not gotten better, only worse. Amal has the ICC, and George Clooney’s Darfur was the beta test for the R2P. The Responsibility to Protect becomes a cornerstone of almost every “humanitarian” event with which they connect themselves. There has been fear the ICC could be used to prosecute U.S. troops. As we watch the UK Labour and US Democrat parties take hard turns left against nationalism and anti-semitism, we can see where this fear is just.

Gareth Evans

Australian Evans has been widely acknowledged as playing a crucial role in “initiating, and advocating the international acceptance of, the concept (of the Responsibility to Protect), first as Co-Chair of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty which introduced the expression in its 2001 report of that name, and subsequently as a member of the UN Secretary-General’s High Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change, Co-Chair of the Advisory Board of the Global Centre on the Responsibility to Protect”. He was also President and CEO of the Brussels based International Crisis Group from 2000-2009. He is now President Emeritus of the ICG and a member of the selection committee of Clooney’s Aurora Prize “100 Lives”.

George Soros/Center for American “Progress”

György Schwartz, better known to the world as George Soros, was born August 12, 1930 in Hungary. Soros’ father, Tivadar, was an expert in Esperanto—a language invented in 1887 designed to be the first global language, free of any national identity. The Schwartzs, who were non-practicing Jews, changed the family name to Soros in order to facilitate their assimilation into the Gentile population as the Nazis spread into Hungary during the 1930’s. When Hitler’s henchman Adolf Eichmann arrived in Hungary to oversee the Holocaust of its Jews, George Soros ended up going on rounds with a man whose job was to confiscate property from the Jewish population. Soros has repeatedly called 1944, the year “70% of Mr. Soros’ fellow Jews in Hungary, nearly a half-million human beings were killed the ‘best year of (his) life’”. Indeed the seeds for Soros’ sociopathic tendencies towards hatred of nationalism-especially where “free” nations like Israel and the United States are concerned-seem to have been sown during these formative years.

The anti-nationalism seeds acquired by Soros during World War II continued thereafter when he attended the London School of Economics, where one of his professors was fellow atheist and Hungarian Karl Popper. Two of Popper’s most influential teachings concerned “the open society,” which refers to a “test and evaluate” approach to social engineering. Regarding this “open society”, Roy Childs writes, “Since the Second World War, most of the Western democracies have followed Popper’s advice about piecemeal social engineering and democratic social reform, and it has gotten them into a grand mess”. This is especially true in Europe where these societies are currently collapsing, giving rise to the current nationalist and populist trends destroying the globalist utopian in lieu of stronger sovereign protections.

In 1956, Soros moved to New York City where he worked on Wall Street and started amassing his billion dollar fortune as a hedge fund operator. Soros was absolutely ruthless, amoral, and clever in his business dealings that quickly made him a fortune. His financial manipulations via “vulture capitalism”, not “free market capitalism”, affect the fates of nations, their currencies, and their citizens. One especially egregious example of his predatory speculation activities earned him the nickname “the man who broke the Bank of England”. Kyle-Anne Shiver of The American Thinker said, “Soros made his first billion in 1992 by shorting the British pound with leveraged billions in financial bets, and became known as the man who broke the Bank of England. He broke it on the backs of hard-working British citizens who immediately saw their homes severely devalued and their life savings cut drastically…almost overnight.” This is not the only time he has done this, but it was the first time he did it to a major western nation.

Even though Soros is usually referred to by the liberal media as a “financier” or “philanthropist”, what Soros actually does is criminal and inhumane. He influences the balkanization of areas of the world ripe for the picking identified through his late brother Paul’s satellite company DigitalGlobal. Then he causes their collapse through market manipulation via his off-shore hedge fund, Quantum Funds before “saving” the people from the crisis that he helped create as a “human rights issue” via some sort of UN “humanitarian” intervention. Soros and his ilk have commandeered the use of the term “human rights” to facilitate the falls of Eastern Europe and Africa first, followed by Western Europe and now North America. It is all part of his “social engineering” plan for an “open borders” society to be carried out by the UN. As Anne Bayefsky, of National Review, stated:

“Soros, logged as one of President Obama’s frequent White House guests, appreciates that a human-rights mantra, particularly when amplified with the U.N.’s global megaphone, is a formidable tool for manipulating public policy. A tool, mind you, and not a principle… He has brought together the unelected, unaccountable NGO claiming to represent ‘civil society’, the Democratic party and its sitting president, and the world’s chief global organization, each supportive of the others in a plethora of financial and personal interrelationships, and all sharing common goals: diminishing American power and mothballing the idea of unadulterated universal values… Soros’s view is the antithesis of human-rights protection. It directly contradicts the vision of common, inviolable rights and freedoms, which the visionaries who founded America, the United Nations, and Human Rights Watch understood.”

The Newspeak meanings of the terms “human rights” and “humanitarian” is perhaps the most disgusting outcome of this method of operation. The poor masses Soros and his minions claim to want to help are nothing more than a means to an end of increasing their own wealth and power as the poor get poorer and their living conditions worsen. People cannot be ruled if they are free and prosperous. They can be ruled when they are desperate and needy. In their world, the “human rights” allowed to the masses are only the ones the elites allow them to have and “humanitarian” infers only the elites can save them via the transfer of the world’s wealth and power to them.

Thus the 1990’s saw Soros increase his global hold on economics and politics. In 1997, Soros continued this destruction with the economies of Thailand and Malaysia. At the time, Malaysia’s Prime Minister, Mahathir Mohamad, called Soros “a villain, and a moron.” Thai activist Weng Tojirakarn said, “We regard George Soros as a kind of Dracula. He sucks the blood from the people.” Soros was also involved in the Balkanization of the former Yugoslavia. Coincidentally, Amal Clooney participated in the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. The website Greek National Pride reported, “[Soros] was part of the full court press that dismantled Yugoslavia and caused trouble in Georgia, Ukraine and Myanmar [Burma]. Calling himself a philanthropist, Soros’ role is to tighten the ideological stranglehold of globalization and the New World Order while promoting his own financial gain. He is without conscience; a (vulture) capitalist who functions with absolute amorality.” Side note: Amal Clooney was called upon to ‘represent” Yulia Tymoshenko in Ukraine and two random “journalists” in Burma.

At one point, his native Hungary fined Soros 2.2 million dollars for “illegal market manipulation.” Elizabeth Crum writes that “The Hungarian economy has been in a state of transition as the country seeks to become more financially stable and Westernized. [Soros’] deliberately driving down the share price of its largest bank put Hungary’s economy into a wicked tailspin, one from which it is still trying to recover.” The recent push for “open borders” via the “migrant crisis” as the means by which the elites are attempting to erase borders and use radical Islam and “xenophobia” to eliminate Christianity has Soros facing off with Hungary’s current “right wing” leader Viktor Orban. Orban declared it would build a Trump-like wall to stop the “Soros invasion”. By December of 2018, the “extreme right wing” Orban government had forced “philanthropist” Soros to close his “accredited” university the Central European University (CEU), established in 1991 after the fall of the Soviet Union. According to the mission statement on its website, one of its aims is to be “a source of support for building open and democratic societies that respect human rights and human dignity.” Lots of Newspeak used here to garner sympathy for the great “human rights” “philanthropist”. As the Newspeak is uncovered and more nation’s take this stance, Soros and the New World Order lose power…and their collective minds.

One area Soros has not been able to control is Russia. In 1994 Soros triumphantly declared himself the world’s top communist when he stated in The New Republic that, “The former Soviet Empire is now called the Soros Empire.” The Russia-gate scandal in 1999, engineered by Soros much in the same way he did with England, Thailand, Malaysia, and Hungary, almost collapsed the Russian economy. Concerns over Russian currency devaluation ramped up when Soros “urged Russian economic leaders to devalue the ruble and introduce a currency pegged to the dollar or euro”. As a result, “the Russian stock market went into a meltdown Thursday, causing a halt in trading for 35 minutes and prompting the local press to dub the day ‘Black Thursday’.” It was labeled by Rep. Jim Leach, then head of the House Banking Committee, to be “one of the greatest social robberies in human history.” It did not cause a complete collapse, though. The “Soros Empire” replacing the “Soviet Empire” had to wait as Soros has “not been able to crack…The Russian Federation. Russia’s political pragmatism and humanist value system rooted in a traditional, ‘nation-state’ culture most likely infuriates Soros”. Soros has been trying to capture and kill-off for Russia for nearly a decade to no avail.

Soros thought he would have a chance at infiltrating Russia during Medvedev’s rule. The 2009 “Russian reset” was an attempt by the Obama administration, with Hillary Clinton the Secretary of State, to improve relations between the United States and Russia. Medvedev also received the “I’ll have more flexibility after the (November 2012) election” message from Obama before he turned over his office to Putin. Furthermore, in a document from November 2012 entitled, “OSF [Open Society Foundation] Russia Strategic Planning Meeting Notes”, members of the OSF discussed how to “Identify joint priorities for OSF’s Russia activities in the coming year. How can we most effectively collaborate, considering the deteriorating political environment for our partners?” According to Zero Hedge, “The main revelation of the document minutes comes from the hope that Medvedev’s years as president would provide the NGOs the “opening” they would need to finally break the Russian bear. That all evaporated in May of 2012, when Vladimir Putin returned to the President’s office. The OSF, clearly distraught and disappointed, began to lay down the groundwork for how to challenge the Putin administration, in light of his very different approach to dealing with NGOs like the Open Society Foundation. The DNC leaks further revealed, “The human rights context has greatly changed from 2006 to 2012: the Medvedev period allowed for a number of improvements and significant openings for NGOs . Amendments to the NGO law in 2006 led to campaigning on behalf of NGOs; many of our grantees benefited during this period. Surkov established ties with many groups that were willing to cooperate with the state and our partners served as experts in key processes like police reform. A space was created for modernization and for the inclusion of civil society during Medvedev’s term. However, pressure has come back very quickly in the short time that Putin has been back in power.” Putin’s election put not only Soros’s plan for world domination at risk in several areas.

First was the passage of the Magnitsky Act which was done shortly after Obama was re-elected. The main point of the law was to supposedly punish Russian officials who were thought to be responsible for the death of Russian tax accountant Sergei Magnitsky by “prohibiting their entrance to the United States and their use of its banking system”. Senators Ben Cardin (D-MD) and John McCain (R-AZ) proposed the legislation brought to them by Magnitsky’s American born businessman friend Bill Browder. The Senate passed the House version of the act on December 6, 2012 with Obama signing it on December 14, 2012. Vladimir Putin retaliated against the United States’s passage of the Magnitsky Act by banning adoptions of Russian children by citizens of the United States. The Magnitsky Act becomes a platform upon which Amal Clooney bases many of her “cases” including the Maldives, Azerbijian, and Myanmar. In fact, the Clooneys dined with UK Labour Leader (and brother of former Prime Minister David) Ed Milliband in January of 2015 to brief him on “proposals to implement a ‘Magnitsky law’ over a private meal with the Hollywood actor and his wife, Amal, the human rights lawyer.” In 2016, Congress enacted the Global Magnitsky Act, which allows the US government to sanction foreign government officials implicated in human rights abuses anywhere in the world. The Magnitsky Act later becomes a cornerstone of the coup attempt against President Trump. More on this later…

Eventually the Russian government realized the cancerous nature of Soros backed NGOs and took the proper preventative measures. In November of 2015, Putin effectively banned Soros from the country: “Russian Prosecutor General’s Office issued a statement in which it recognized George Soros’s Open Society Institute and another affiliated organization as ‘undesirable groups’, banning Russian citizens and organizations from participation in any of their projects. Prosecutors said the activities of the Open Society Institute and the Open Society Institute Assistance Foundation were a threat to the foundations of Russia’s Constitutional order and national security . They added that the Justice Ministry would be duly informed about these conclusions and would add the two groups to Russia’s list of undesirable foreign organizations”. Per the DC Leaks , it proved a very wise move. The DC Leaks showed how dangerous the Open Society and George Soros were to the well-being and preservation of the Russian Federation and the Russian culture.

Since Soros has not been able to topple Russia from within, he had his agents placed around the area attempting to bait Putin into war. There are many in the Ukraine placed through an illegal coup of a democratically elected government using neo-Nazi strong men. The Soros, Clinton and her campaign manager John Podesta are very active in the Ukrainian energy sector which is under constant threat by Putin. Billionaire Victor Pinchuk donated upwards of $25 million to the Clinton Foundation in order to pressure former Ukrainian President Yanukovych to release Yulia Tymoshenko – a political rival of Yanukovych and a “client” of Amal Clooney’s – from jail. Then there is Syria. Russia and Turkey have fought with Syria against ISIS and the Obama/Soros backed “rebels” over a pipeline here. In July of 2012, Amal traveled as an “adviser” to Kofi Annan when he met with Putin to discuss the Syrian crisis. Seeing no diplomatic resolution, the “Responsibility to Protect” was invoked in December of 2012: “The Government of Syria is manifestly failing to protect its populations,” the Secretary-General’s Special Adviser on the Prevention of Genocide, Adama Dieng, said in a statement in December 2012. “The international community must act on the commitment made by all Heads of State and Government at the 2005 World Summit to protect populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity, including their incitement,” said Mr. Dieng. This seems to be the end game for every area of the world where regime change is needed to expedite the harvesting of resources. Soros has been a supporter of the “Responsibility to Protect” since the overthrow of Qaddafi in Libya:

“Philanthropist billionaire George Soros is a primary funder and key proponent of the global organization that promotes the military doctrine used by the Obama administration to justify the recent airstrikes targeting the regime of Moammar Gadhafi in Libya. The Responsibility to Protect doctrine has been described by its founders and proponents, including Soros, as promoting global governance while allowing the international community to penetrate a nation state’s borders under certain conditions. Libya regarded as test of global doctrine…The joint U.S. and international air strikes targeting Libya are widely regarded as a test of Responsibility to Protect ­ which is a set of principles, now backed by the United Nations, based on the idea that sovereignty is not a privilege, but a responsibility…According to the principle, any state’s sovereignty can be overrun, including with the use of military force,if the international community decides it must act to halt what it determines to be genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity or ethnic cleansing.”

It obviously did not work in Syria. Therefore the “Restrain the Veto” initiative was invoked in 2015 at the UN when Laurent Fabius, Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Development, stated, “Quite simply because we cannot resign ourselves to the Security Council’s paralysis when mass atrocities are committed, and we see this in numerous situations, including in Syria. The main idea is that the veto isn’t a privilege, it’s a responsibility”. Amal was present and given a shout out in the warmonging speech: “Finally, I want to welcome the very many prominent figures who are here with us today. I cannot name you all, but if it is not embarrassing to her, I would like to mention in particular Mrs Amal Clooney, who was kind enough to join us, and who will be able to help us achieve this just cause in all the countries where she exerts influence.” Where she exerts influence? In any event, Hillary Clinton promised to topple Asaad as a “humanitarian” mission after her “coronation”, so with her shocking loss, the threat of war eased. Aleppo has since been freed by Russia and Turkey. A tentative peace deal has been established. Lives have been spared. If it all holds, the “refugee” crisis can effectively rectify itself, thus ending the “humanitarian” “open borders” push, no hope for war with Russia, and Putin looks like a hero. Other than “hacking” claims, Soros will have to find other ways to antagonizing Putin into war without GOP led American help.

These are just a few major areas of the world where we have seen the depravity of George Soros in actions. In fact, almost every area of conflict in the world today has his fingerprints on it. However, he has a lot of help in selling his “humanitarian” regime change aegnda. In the United States it is mostly the democrat party and pop culture. Enter George Clooney. Clooney is the modern day Goebbels to Soros as the modern day Hitler. With Soros’s wealth and Clooney’s pop culture presence, they have attempted to create a fakenews “media” endeavor, including the suppression of opposing viewpoints, to create a Newspeak about which Orwell & Hitler could have only dreamed. George’s marriage to Amal, an Israeli hating Muslim from an extremely wealthy and well connected Middle Eastern family including her mother who is an Al Jazeera reporter and foreign editor of Al Hayat, created the UN PowerCouple of Media Matters/Participant Media.

Media Matters/Participant Media

Soros has been using much of his money to support the Democratic Party and organizations associated with it. Forbes magazine says Soros has a net worth of $22 billion, making him the 7th richest person in America. The only hedge-fund manager ranked in Forbes’s top ten, Soros lives in Katonah, New York, where Hillary Clinton served as a United States Senator for two terms from 2001-2009. In 2002, Soros and Morton Halperin, leader of Soros’ Open Society Institute, started discussions regarding the “Center for American Progress”(CAP), a think tank designed specifically for and with the help of Hillary Clinton to use the Democrat Party in the United States to advance the takedown of the Constitution through “social justice” platforms such as “energy, national security, economic growth, immigration, education, and healthcare”. In other words, “climate”, “refugee” and “education”. Since the money is funneled into this “nonprofit”, it is not subject to Citizens United-type “get big money out of politics” laws, which is why Democrats have no trouble pushing for “campaign finance reform”. At the time, Washington Post columnist Harold Meyerson, a member of the Democratic Socialists of America, praised Soros for engineering the “privatization” of the Democratic Party through funding of the “527 ‘nonprofit’” political groups and bypassing what he called an incompetent Democratic Party apparatus.

In addition, Soros was convinced the Bush election victory in 2000 followed by a subsequent majority win in both houses of Congress two years later had everything to do with the GOP’s great media presence. As such, “One of CAP’s chief priorities has been to carry out ‘rapid response’ to what it calls conservative ‘attacks’ in the media.” To this end, CAP has always maintained numerous spokespeople, such as George Clooney, and “experts” ready to appear on short notice on national talk shows to debate or respond to conservative commentators. Furthermore, Soros eventually realized, like Hitler, that the best way to control the vote besides fraud involved the manipulation of the masses via pop culture propaganda, so on May 3, 2004, CAP helped launch David Brock’s Media Matters for America to serve as a “ ‘watchdog’ organization monitoring ‘rightwing’ media for ethics violations and factual inaccuracies. According to the NY Times, Brock conferred with Hillary Clinton, Senator Tom Daschle (D-SD a distinguished senior fellow with CAP) and former U.S. Vice President Al Gore about Media Matters before embarking on the project.” This is the same David Brock

who directed the pro-Hillary Clinton Super PAC Correct the Record and wrote “The Travelgate Cover-Up” for The American Spectator in June of 1994. In it he referred to the couple’s “influence-peddling and sleazy deal-making” and claimed that “Screwing over the ‘little people’ is the Clintons’ prerogative.” He also put scare quotes around “strong moral compass” in reference to Hillary Clinton and referred to her and her husband’s desire to ensure that former employees “would be ruined, Arkansas-style.” Pushing “fake news” via Brock with Soros money seemed the best way to “sell” Hillary to a “deplorable” public.

In that same year, Participant Media was founded by Jeffrey Skoll, the former President of eBay, to fund feature films and documentaries that promote their social values (regardless of facts) in order to promote agenda while still being commercially viable. It is not shocking to learn then that Participant Media is financed in part by Soros: “That project then served as a consultant to Participant in creating its index, which received $4.2 million in combined financing from the Knight and Gates foundations and from George Soros’ Open Society Foundations.” Several popular yet intentionally factually incorrect films produced by this company to push the agenda’s points included the award-winning Hollywood darling Al Gore documentary on “global warming” entitled An Inconvenient Truth, which, according to the Soros DC Leaks, received $30 million over three years to push this global warming hysteria, even forcing it as mandatory viewing in public middle schools to brainwash our children.

The first major Hollywood player at Participant Media was George Clooney. Both Syriana and Good Night and Good Luck are Participant Media endeavors. Both movies pushed false media narratives, too. Syriana was used in part to push the “Americans are Islamophobic” and “Oil is bad” mantras. Allan H. Ryskind, author of “Hollywood Traitors: Blacklisted Screenwriters Agents of Stalin, Allies of Hitler”, observed:

Allan H. Ryskind, author of “Hollywood Traitors: Blacklisted Screenwriters Agents of Stalin, Allies of Hitler”, observed:

“How many movies, for instance, show Americans bravely routing Islamic terrorists? How many films offer any justification for the harsh interrogation techniques or important internal security measures we have used to keep our country safe since 9/ 11? Almost none, of course…Take the film Syriana, for instance, for which George Clooney won an Oscar for Best Supporting Actor. A heroic Arab prince wants to end corruption and oppression, especially of women, and modernize his country. And wouldn’t you know it, the CIA obliterates him and his family with a remote-controlled missile. The film also features a wonderfully humane Pakistani who feels impelled by America’s heinous policies to become a suicide bomber and carries out a mission similar to the terrorist assault on the USS Cole. (Just for the record , the suicide bombers that severely damaged the Cole and murdered seventeen American sailors were directed by Osama bin Laden’s “idealistic” group, al Qaeda.)”

In exchange for sanitizing Islam, Clooney’s propaganda snagged him an Oscar and won him, Warner Brothers, and his and Grant Hezlov’s Section Eight Productions an award in 2006 from the Muslim Public Affairs Council which, “in an effort to promote positive and accurate portrayals of Islam and Muslims…each year recognizes voices of courage and conscience who are the best in their field”. They were honored for creating an “eye-opening portrait of politics, petroleum and power”. The Islamafication of America via pop culture was underway with Clooney at the helm.

Meanwhile Good Night and Good Luck acted as a propaganda piece to paint the McCarthy era as one in which “paranoid conservatives” were on a “Communist witch hunt against Democrats” when in reality, McCarthy’s suspicion of Communists in Hollywood working against American interests was very real. Clooney admitted as much in an interview with Salon during the press junket for the movie. According to Blacklisted by History: The Untold Story of Senator Joe McCarthy and His Fight Against America’s Enemies by M. Stanton Evans:

“A second recent treatment of the Moss affair that deserves brief notice isn’t a scholarly work, but undoubtedly has done more to spread disinformation about the case than a dozen history books together. This is the George Clooney film Good Night and Good Luck, released in 2005, based on the 1954 confrontation between McCarthy and Edward R. Murrow (the title of the film is taken from Murrow’s habitual sign-off). This Clooney opus portrays McCarthy as a fearsome dragon and Murrow as the brave knight-errant who dared to slay him. In a mix of modern production methods and video clips taken from the archives, the movie affects to be a study in cinema verité, supposedly revealing the evil of McCarthy simply by showing him in action. The case of Annie Lee Moss is featured, as it was by Murrow himself back in the 1950s. It’s of interest that neither in the Clooney film nor in the original Murrow broadcast is there any evidence cited to indicate Moss was an innocent victim—the message being conveyed instead by video clips of Moss and of McClellan browbeating Cohn for allegedly treating her unfairly. In the case of the Murrow broadcast, when not all the relevant data were known, this was to some extent excusable (though had Murrow and Co. been the crack journalists they professed to be, they could have dug out the facts about Hattie Griffin and the like from the hearing transcripts). In the case of the Clooney film, there is no excuse whatever, as the truth about the case is fully available to anyone who bothers to review the voluminous SACB reports and archives of the Bureau. Amazingly, in a press interview about all this, Clooney made it clear he had been informed that Mrs. Moss was a Communist and that he didn’t deny it. Instead, he said, the real question stressed by Murrow and his colleagues, and therefore in the Clooney film, was that “they simply demand that she has a right to face her accuser.”19 We are thus informed, after fifty years of being told Mrs. Moss was not a Communist but a mistaken-identity victim, that wasn’t the point at all! It was, instead, her right to face her accuser. If Clooney was indeed aware of the copious evidence on the case, as he should have been in presuming to inform the world about it, he certainly disguised this knowledge in his movie. In the interests of historical truth, the data set forth above should at least have been alluded to, making it clear Mrs. Moss was in fact what Markward (and McCarthy) said, and not the victim of a mistaken-identity foul-up. But, of course, if Clooney had brought out these facts of record, he would have had no movie. Such information would have undercut the thesis of the film about the bullying and reckless lying of McCarthy.”

Perhaps Clooney still has some hard feelings towards McCarthy for calling his uncle Jose Ferrer before his committee back in the 1950’s. In any event, remember this: “Soros…appreciates that a human-rights mantra, particularly when amplified with the U.N.’s global megaphone, is a formidable tool for manipulating public policy. A tool, mind you, and not a principle… all sharing common goals: diminishing American power and mothballing the idea of unadulterated universal values”? This movie did that. It attempted to put the onus on modern-day conservatives as the enemy of “progress” to divert from those who are, indeed, working to erase our sovereignty in lieu of global ruling governance. It crafted “fake news” as truth. Consequently, as with Syriana, in exchange for this propaganda piece, Clooney’s profile was raised significantly in Hollywood including several Academy Award nominations and other critical accolades. Makes sense, then, that this film was the focus of the September 2005 Reel Progress film series in Washington D.C. Reel Progress, established in March of 2005 on the heels of Participant Media, was a new progressive film series sponsored by the aforementioned Soros Center for American Progress.

The same year Media Matters launched was also the year of the first documented meeting between Soros and Barack Obama. In June 2004, the billionaire hosted a fundraiser for Obama’s U. S. Senate campaign at his New York home. Additionally, George’s dad, Nick, who held no political office whatsoever in his life but did consider himself a “trusted journalist”, ran in 2004 as the lone Democrat for Congress in his Kentucky district. As hard as George tried to infiltrate this highly conservative area with Soros progressivism, his dad lost, probably because the bulk of his fundraising came from Hollywood and Beverly Hills, not from the people who actually live there. Clooney’s attempt at forcibly importing Hollywood values to America’s heartland failed. However, the “Perfect Storm” of Hollywood (Clooney), Media (Media Matters and Participant Media) and Democrats (Clinton, Soros, and Obama) had come to fruition. Ultimately, their hubris cost them not only Nick’s election but many others, as well, from the rise of the Tea Party in the 2010 midterms to Hillary’s embarrassing defeat to Donald Trump in 2016.

The democrat primary of 2016 was rigged to favor Hillary Clinton. We know this through the DNC emails provided by Wikileaks whose founder, Julian Assange, as at one time a client of Hillary Clinton fundraiser Amal Clooney before she married George. In any event, the undercover work of another prime target of Media Matters, Project Veritas journalist James O’Keefe, produced an undercover video series titled “Rigging The Election”, an exposé they have described as a “multi-part series which exposes the dark secrets at the highest levels of the DNC and Clinton presidential campaign.” In this video, a PVA journalist exposes how his “pay for play with Robert Creamer landed him a meeting with Bradley Beychock, the President of Media Matters For America, an organization that has been attacking James O’Keefe for years. During the meeting, Beychock gave the PVA journalist a tour of their offices. He also proudly boasted about the Media Matters assault on conservative writer and political consultant Roger Stone.” Bullying. Censorship. These are the actions in which Media Matters work to make Democrats palpable to the American people. Brock even went so far as to demand that Bernie Sanders stop “negative attacks” against Hillary. Brock knew the Democrat primary was rigged against Sanders. Sanders did not. Brock did not need the popular Sanders smearing their already established candidate, “helping Karl Rove and his ilk do their general election dirty work.” Sanders eventually got on board…after buying a new beach house.

One area in which the Democrat hubris is apparent is with Islam. While Participant Media and Clooney worked on smoothing over the image of radical Islam while demeaning anyone who spoke out it against it with movies like Syriana and Good Night and Good Luck, Soros continued with his attempt to mainstream Islam, as well. First off, in September of 2011, Soros looked to expand his operations in Egypt via the Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights, which is run in partnership with the Open Society Justice Initiative. The group seeks to develop a national network of legal empowerment actors for referral of public-interest law cases. Such organizations in the past have helped represent Muslim Brotherhood leaders seeking election or more authority in the country. In addition, the George Soros-funded Social Science Research Council, along with the Edward R. Murrow (think Good Night and Good Luck) College of Communication at Washington State University, received $50,000 from the Open Society Institute as one of the groups behind a new course on Islam designed for journalists which tries to minimize the impact and importance of ”jihad” by comparing it to the number of murders in America each year.

That same course in keeping with Newspeak pushed claims ”right-wing activists” tried to tie American Muslims to terrorism and does not mention examples of Islamic attacks on press freedom. That fits with a theme for liberal financier Soros, who has spent more than $52 million on influencing the media. The Islamic course also links to another Soros-funded entity, the well-financed Center for American Progress.” In about 30 pages of text with links to other reports and articles, journalists can go through and read about the history of Islam, Muslims in America, and how to cover stories on Islam. Besides learning basic facts about Muslims and their history, the course adds ways to put “jihad” into perspective, attack conservatives, and provide a list of liberal groups that can be contacted for expert advice and quotes.” He is funding an operation to train “journalists” on how to “properly” cover Muslims.

However, when this push to “normalize” Islam while claiming to be the “party of women and LGBT issues” was questioned in line with the Clinton pay-to-play scheme of accepting large bribes from nations that violate the rights of these groups, Media Matters stepped in to spin. In a memo dated March 9th 2015, Media Matters says Hillary and the Clinton Foundation’s practice of taking large donations from repressive regimes did not count against her as a “pro woman” and “pro LGBT” candidate because she “speaks out” a lot. By the time this memo was written, Media Matters had fully converted into Hillary’s advocate. According to Warren Todd Huston of Breitbart:

“A recent piece in National Journal reveals that Media Matters and two other far-left groups — American Bridge and Correct The Record — have all turned their organizations into Hillary advocates well before her announcement. Media Matters has been the main purveyor of the leftist, Democratic message. Even National Journal, a left-leaning publication, notes that Media Matters easily programs the national media narrative: It is “often easy to trace Media Matters’ influence on a major news story… Regardless, it appears that Brock and company have assigned to themselves the duty of getting Hillary Clinton elected President of the United States.”

Another angle Media Matters thought it had covered involved the background of Hillary’s top aide, Huma Abedin. That was until Vanity Fair reported on Abedin’s ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, including her time as an assistant editor at The Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs from 1996 until 2008 which leads to her family’s association with Abdullarh Omar Nasseef who, “In his early years as the patron of the Abedins’ journal, (Nasseef) was the secretary-general of the Muslim World League, which Andrew McCarthy, the former assistant U.S. attorney who prosecuted the ‘Blind Sheik’, Omar Abdel Rahman, in the wake of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, claims ‘has long been the Muslim Brotherhood’s principal vehicle for the international propagation of Islamic supremacist ideology.’ This information can be verified with a simple Google search. It is not “fake news”. However, Media Matters came out swinging with their ad hominem smear tactics parroted by the mainstream media to denounce “Right wing conspiracies” and “xenophobia”. If the general public knew the depths of Hillary Clinton’s (and Clooney’s) ties to radical Islam and the pay to play scheme via the Clinton Foundation involved with these human rights abusing countries that hate the west, there was no way she would get elected. David Brock and Media Matters worked to make sure no one found out, pushing “fake news” to vilify anyone who got in their way.

The manipulation of the press/media to formulate the west as Islamophobic especially in America, has gone full throttle with Clooney who claims to be for “freedom of speech and freedom of the press”. After all, George reminds us at every opportunity that his dad, Nick, was a “journalist”. As with “democracy”, no he is not…unless it suits his politics. He advocates for silencing dissenting voices just as much as his employers. Take the Media Matters hit pieces on Foxnews hosts. They went after Sean Hannity and failed. They went after Tucker Carlson not once (which included their ‘supporters’ surrounding his home as his wife and children cowered inside) but twice. Tucker, to his credit, unearthed a smear campaign of his own against current Media Matters President Angelo Carusone. As a good democrat, Carusone has projected onto Tucker what he in reality is himself….a racist, homophobic anti Semite. Tucker and Hannity developed the spine to push back after Clooney and Media Matters ran Bill O’Reilly off the network.

Knowing now how almost hand picked Clooney was to lead the Media Matters/CAP propaganda brigade, no one should be surprised at the platform he was given to defend himself against O’Reilly when Bill questioned back in 2005 where all of Hollywood’s “charity” money went once it was raised. He said, “In the aftermath of the 9/11 attack, there was a celebrity-driven TV telethon that raised millions for the affected families, (and) now there will be another telethon raising money for those hurt by those the tsunami (including) our pal George Clooney…You may also remember that Clooney strenuously objected to The Factor investigation that uncovered problems in distributing the 9/11 money, even though we proved our case and the Red Cross revamped its entire operation because of it.” George got very defensive and went on Letterman & The Today Show to call O’Reilly names, insist there was no fraud involved (they had not released the funds because they had not yet received the names of the dead. Have they since? ) and demand O’Reilly “put up or shut up” and appear on the telethon. O’Reilly accepted the invite. Eventually, though, O’Reilly was silenced. Media Matters & Participant Media are Goebbel like entities created by George Soros to push their narrative while silencing opposition with Clooney as their pop culture conduit. Hitler would be proud and McCarthy vindicated.

Since then, Media Matters has moved into censoring “fake news” online with the help of Facebook, meaning Media Matters gets to decide what stays and what goes. This, of course, means anything that does not fit the progressive narrative. Just recently, on March 21, 2019, David Brock announced a $50 million effort to “weaken Trump” in 2020. Clooney has run other telethons, most notably for Haiti. He also had a hand in “humanitarian aid” in almost every “humanitarian” disaster and “human rights” project in the world through “The Sentry” and the “Enough Project” housed, not coincidentally, at the Center for American “Progress” in Washington D.C. However, every area of the world he claimed to want to help he has abandoned leaving them in way worse shape as his bank account has grown. In fact, every single “charity” with which he is involved through “Global Citizen” was outed in some sort of fraud and/or sex abuse case after Trump’s election. Does Mrs. O’Reilly realize how correct he probably was about George Clooney’s “charity”?

The “Enough” Project

Today’s communists hide behind the term “democracy” with the likes of Soros, Evans, and Clooney’s other handlers leading the way. Soros’s right hand man is John Podesta, White House Chief of Staff to President Clinton from October 1998 until January 2001, “counselor” to President Obama from January 2014 until February 2015, and the chairman of Hillary Clinton’s spectacular president loss in 2016. He is also the former President and now Chair and Counselor of Soros’s Center for American Progress. In 2007, the Podesta/Soros CAP co-founded the “Enough” Project with Evans’s International Crisis Group. Its stated mission is to “end genocide and crimes against humanity” focused primarily on “conflict areas in Africa including Sudan, South Sudan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the Central African Republic… which facilitates several campaigns and initiatives which work to bring attention to these crises, including The Sentry, Raise Hope for Congo, and the Satellite Sentinel Project.” The leader of the Enough Project, The Sentry and the Satellite Sentinel Project? George Clooney.

Another person involved in the strings pulled here is John Prendergast. He worked closely with Samantha Power as a “US advocate of intervention in Africa (who) had started his career as a humanitarian in Sudan, writing reports on the excruciating violence between rival southern militias for Human Rights Watch. Under Bill Clinton, he had worked at the National Security Council as Director for African Affairs and as an advisor to Susan Rice in the State Department. He would later work for the Evans’s International Crisis Group”. With this “Enough” Project, Prendergast became the “humanitarian bridge to the Hollywood elite, helping recruit Clooney (Sudan), Angelina Jolie (sexual violence in war zones), Matt Damon (water), Ben Affleck (Congo) and Don Cheadle (genocide and environment)”. Keeping in mind Brad Pitt co-founded the “Not On Our Watch” project with Clooney and Prendergast, it seems the Ocean’s cast were almost handpicked. Actually, ever notice that Clooney tends to work with the same small group of people in almost every movie? Most of them are part of the Enough Project. In this group, Podesta and Evans have a group of Hollywood and pop culture sycophants to brainwash the masses the likes of which Hitler and Goebbels could only have dreamed. Whenever their faces appear, remember who they represent…those who pinpoint areas with George’s Satellite Sentinel Project to destabilize those regions economically, crash their economies, swoop in “save” the country as they get rich off the backs of the hard working people of that nation by raping the country’s resources, and then put their minions in place to lord over the mineral recovery and the destitute citizens while importing a replacement citizenry of “refugees”. Almost everywhere they have done it, Clooney has been involved with his ‘humanitarian” projects…Ukraine, Sudan, Congo, Malaysia, Yugoslavia, Syria, Libya…and now they are all working to do it in the west.

This is why they hate Trump. He represents their biggest obstacles to world domination. The first step was cutting off their funding through perpetual war. First, he allowed the destruction of ISIS in Syria (who the Obama administration armed). In fact, on Friday, March 22, 2019, the declaration of their defeat militarily in Syria was stated publicly. Therefore, there will be no regime change in Syria while Trump is President which means no war with Russia while he is in office which means vast quantities of oil are left for Putin. Additionally, remember when Clooney had to step up for Hollywood and support his friend Obama when tensions rose between Kim Jung Un with the Sony hack and The Interview? Then Trump was going to get us all killed via a nuclear confrontation with “Rocket Man”? Trump has since brought peace to the Korean peninsula. In March 2019, the US and South Korea ended spring military drills to “back diplomacy” and North Korea withdrew from the DMZ joint liaison office. Finally, Trump killed the Iranian nuclear deal which halts any potential conflict with Israel. His election also exposed the rabid anti-Semitism on the left including repeated calls for Israel’s destruction. Remember when Amal Clooney accepted a request to serve on a UN panel to investigate Israeli “war crimes” in the Gaza strip in 2014? She quickly withdrew her name from consideration because she did not want it to overshadow her three day wedding extravaganza. The elimination of the Jews is part of their plan. That will not happen for now. They could only invade Syria, Israel, etc via the “Responsibility to Protect” with a willing participant. With Trump in office, implementation of the R2P will not occur in the many areas of the world the Clinton camp had their eyes on which means no rich minerals to harvest and the “refugee” flow could stop since people have no need to leave and/or can return home. They hate Trump because he has choked off a primary source of their wealth from perpetual war.

Then there is Trump’s support of free market capitalism over socialism which they have tried to promote here. Venezuela’s President Maduro was praised by the likes of Sean Penn and Oliver Stone for his great “socialist haven”. Now, the people of Venezuela have gone three days without electrical power and are literally scouring the streets for food. The Paris Climate Agreement/renewable energy is not helping the people of Venezuela. The same Hollywood stooges screeched when Trump pulled out of the Paris Climate Agreement because it is designed to act as the UN’s ultimate financial grab by redistributing the wealth of the western nations to third world nations to help alleviate “poverty”. Noble except that the money always seems to get intercepted by these “humanitarians” when it transfers from the “first” world to the “third” world. Additionally, the United States has decreased its carbon footprint while out of the Paris Climate Accord while the top polluters, China and India, keep running unchecked with no calls from these Hollywood “environmentalists” for these countries to join the Paris Agreement. Trump is their “wall” to 1% domination. Not only that but most of them since the election have been outed as hypocritical long time friends/supporters/coverers for sexual predators after years of claiming to be “pro women”. Some of them were even accused themselves. It is why every person involved in these Clooney endeavors suffered a severe case of Trump Derangement Syndrome after the 2016 election. Their covers as “humanitarians”, “environmentalists” and “pro women” could be blown. A quick rundown of some of the “Enough” Project members and their violations:

George Clooney – A lifetime member of the Council of Foreign Relations, he famously declared in May of 2016 from Cannes “There’s not gonna be a President Trump”. Already noted is his involvement with the Magnitsky Act, which was being used to help take Trump out. Eventually we will find Amal and her family are tied to all the members of the Spygate/Russian Collusion attempted coup, too. Additionally, George was accused of blacklisting Vanessa Marquez, an actress on ER who recently spoke out against the sex assault on set. The woman who accused him was conveniently shot dead in a supposedly unrelated incident later. He is also a longtime friend of Harvey Weinstein and Les Moonves. In fact, Moonves takes credit for Clooney’s career in terms of getting him the breakout role on NBC’s ER, and his wife, Julie Chen, was given the exclusive to announce their pregnancy. Clooney also trashed Trump at the French Cesars Awards in February of 2017 as he defended child rapist Roman Polanski. Clooney is a sex assault enabler, if not one himself, tied to the attempted coup of a sitting President, and has also profiteered handsomely from the regime change he supports. For example, Nespresso claimed the coffee fields in South Sudan once the country was established with the help of George Clooney. He then received a $40 million contract as their spokesperson. He has not been back to visit since. Nespresso claimed he would be in 2015, but that all changed in 2016 a month before the rigged election. The country is now, as President Trump would say, a “shithole”. That’s “Democracy” George Clooney style.

Matt Damon – Damon appeared in numerous films with Clooney including the “Ocean’s” trilogy, “The Good Shepherd, “The Monuments Men” and “Suburbicon”. He intentionally misinterpreted Trump’s Charlottesville remarks in order to call him “absolutely abhorrent”. He owes his career to Harvey Weinstein as Weinstein gave him and his best friend Ben Affleck (who is also a member of the “Enough” Project) their big break with Good Will Hunting.

Julianne Moore – starred in “Suburbicon” with Damon and Clooney. Says what the Trump Administration is doing is “incredibly detrimental” (does not matter the subject). She joined a protest during the inauguration. She supports the elimination of our constitutional rights, especially the Second Amendment, and advocates for post birth abortion. She, too, claimed shock about Weinstein after decades of working with him and suddenly remembered James Tobak harassed her once. No problem keeping her mouth shut for years stay employed (and famous) while claiming to support women.

Don Cheadle – another Ocean’s 11 alum. His entire Twitter feed reads like some racist dialogue handed to Clooney’s token black friend to spew. Some of his insane rants are in this link. He blames the violence in Chicago, Obama’s homebase, ON TRUMP, not the economic and political issues brought on by decades of democrat rule and/or strict gun control laws.which Obama completely ignored for eight years. Cheadle worked for Weinstein (see: Oceans), attended the Weinstein Oscar parties, worked with accused rapist Paul Haggis…the list goes on.

Ryan Gosling – starred with Clooney in The Ides of March, which was a full on GOP bashing film, and with Cheadle in The United States of Leland. He’s Canadian, so…here he is with Will Ferrell appearing as “The Knife Guys,” hawking Trump knives, which unfortunately had disappointing results. Imagine doing that to Obama? On the Weinstein front, Gosling was “oblivious” to the claims.

Angelina Jolie – soon-to-be ex-wife of Brad Pitt who starred with Clooney in the Ocean’s trilogy as well as Burn After Reading. He also co-founded the “Not on Our Watch” project with Clooney and Cheadle and was involved with this one for a while although his name is no longer on the website. Angie’s is, though. 2007 was a banner year for her- worked closely with the Clinton Global Initiative , joined the Council on Foreign Relations , made her first public appearance with Brad Pitt at the Cannes Film Festival in May the same month they made a joint million dollar donation to three organizations in Chad and Sudan dedicated to those affected by the crisis in the Darfur because, coincidentally, that was the year the “Enough” Project was founded. In 2012, her primary role shifted to that of UN refugee “special envoy”. In 2017, she wrote an op-ed in rebuttal to the non-existent “Trump Travel Ban” stating it should be based on “facts not fear”. She should take her own advice. See, there is no “ban” of any one person or group of people. There is a stronger vetting process of those arriving from the seven countries on the list. Of those seven countries, two (North Korea and Venezuela) are not Muslim. If this “ban” was Islamophobic, only Muslim majority countries would be on the list, and that list would contain over fifty nations. Finally, it is not “Trump’” ban. This list was put together by Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s “justice” department during the Obama era. The appropriate term for this “list”, then, is “Obama’s Selective Vetting List”. They were all quiet then. In 2017, she just read the script she was given…if she had anything to do with it at all.

Javier Bardem star of the Coen Brother’s No Country for Old Men; perhaps the Coen brothers need investigating? Between their use of Clooney in a large majority for their movies, plus Pitt, Damon, Moore…they seem to cull talent from this cesspool. Bardem defends Woody Allen while his wife Penelope Cruz called her one time collaborator Weinstein “complicated” . Both are anti-Semites who had to be chastised by the father of Enough co-hort Angelina Jolie. .

Robin Wright– ex-wife to proud socialist Sean Penn who lauds human rights violator Castro as a “great leader” and said of Venezuela’s Chavez, “(Chávez) is a fascinating guy. He’s done… incredible things for the 80% of the people that are very poor there”. Wright stars in House of Cards as an incredibly narcissistic, sociopathic first lady in a marriage of convenience for political and financial gain. Of course, she says “Trump stole (House of Cards) ideas” when clearly this entire series is based on the Clintons. She plays the Hillary Clinton role, which means Kevin Spacey played the Bill Clinton part. You know Kevin Spacey…starred in The Men Who Stare At Goats with Clooney and held fundraisers in New Mexico with him for Democrat Bill Richardson? The same Kevin Spacey who was fired from House of Cards as sex assault after sex assault piled up against him? All men, many underage. Wright says, like the rest, she was “surprised” by these accusations and said he deserved a “second chance”. She, too, has worked with Harvey Weinstien many times over the years. In 2009 she attended the Weinstein Company’s dinner for “The Private Lives of Pippa Lee”. She’s like the rest of these “humanitarian” “Enough” project women…in the know about all the abuse…covered it up/stayed silent, stood by as it happened, and then feigned shock once discovered to save face. This plays-pretend-for-a-living person told CNN that Trump knows “so little about the world” especially where the Iran deal was concerned. This woman advocated giving nukes to a top sponsor of Islamic terror who chant “Death to America” in their streets to throw the President under the bus while working with/enabling sex offenders. Funny enough, like Clooney, she got her big break on NBC on the soap opera Santa Barbara. Let’s continue with NBC “Enough Project” members…..

Chris Meloni: the Law & Order: SUV star has Trump Derangement Syndrome almost as badly as Cheadle. His Twitter feed shows this. Take, for instance, “With all due respect – shut up u f—ing d—,” Meloni tweeted. “Ur damaged goods and only Putin and idiots and brown Nosers believe in u.” There is plenty more. Meloni tweeted an article from a former McCain aide titled “We Deserve Better Than Donald Trump” that referred to Trump as a “xenophobic bigot” and openly questioned his readiness for office. He has also called Trump a “snake oil salesman.” Of course, with the release of the Mueller report, we know there was not only no collusion between Trump and Russia but no obstruction, either. As for John McCcain, as the one who delivered the fake dossier that put in motion the Mueller witch hunt, he became every democrats favorite Republican before he died. In addition, Meloni tweets about being naked and also had no issue posting naked photos of Melania Trump. TDS has that effect. Of course, whatever misogynist activities he partakes in real life gets a pass because he plays a sex assault crime fighter at work, right?

Mariska Hargitay: Meloni’s former SVU costar had a recurring role on Clooney’s ER in the late 90’s. She kept quieter politically, though during the GOP primary she once jokingly suggested that it would be better if she were leading in the polls.” She actively supported Clinton. Keep in mind there’s an entire SVU episode dedicated to Trump bashing. This came after one of the debates where former Law & Order writer David Slack tweeted, “the only role Donald Trump could have in Law & Order is as a rich bastard suspected of killing his wife,” and former Law & Order: SVU executive producer Warren Leigh called Trump a “human virus.” Both Slack and Leigh spent the evening live tweeting the debate and criticizing Trump on Twitter; Slack said it looked like Hillary Clinton “was debating the comments section,” and Leigh said Trump “wet himself in the ring.” Then again this is NBC the network that hired Chelsea Clinton for a six figure job with no experience right out of college.

Melissa Fitzgerald & Alison Janney – More NBC political fiction this time from Aaron Sorkin’s The West Wing. They think their acting credentials make them political experts. Fitzgerald was sent to D. C. to be “Senior Director of Justice for Vets”. Yup. Senior director. As for Janney, in response to a tweet by real life Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders, actor Bradley Whitford, who portrayed White House Deputy Chief of Staff Josh Lyman on the popular show, shut down Sanders – telling her she was “no C.J. Cregg.” “I know C.J. Cregg. C.J. Cregg is a friend of mine. You’re no C.J. Cregg,” Uh…there is no CJ Cregg. CJ Cregg is a FICTIONAL CHARACTER played by Allison Janney. She responded to the tweets thanking her former colleague for his sentiment. “Thanks for having my back, Josh love, C.J.,” she wrote on Twitter. THESE PEOPLE ARE CONGRATULATING THEMSELVES FOR FAKE ROLES THEY HELD IN THE FICTIONAL BUBBLE OF HOLLYWOOD. Meanwhile Huckabee Sanders endures their hate and ridicule daily which makes sense because we know how they handle real life misogyny and assault. They partake in it and cover it up. They project.

Julianna Margulies –starred with Clooney in NBC’s “ER”. Used her show “The Good Wife” to bash Americans and Trump repeatedly. On May 17, 2017, to an applauding crowd at Cipriani Wall Street during the Paley Center Honors, she proudly declare, “(Trump) will be in a padded cell someday.” Coincidentally, she “happened” to “recall” in November of 2017 harassment by Weinstein when she went for a screen test with him in 1996 during her third season on ER. Was Margulies silenced then like her ER co-star Vanessa Marquez? Then again, serial sex assault Les Moonves, who was instrumental in ER’s success, inked Margulies to a production deal with CBS in 2014 after having starred in The Good Wife for several years stating, ““Les Moonves has been a mentor and friend since the beginning of my career, when he brought me onto ER,” Margulies said. She knew of Weinstein and owed her career to Moonves while championing Woody Allen? Take a seat, sister.

Maria Bello – another ER alum from 1997-1998; 2010 she guest starred on Law & Order SVU. at the Sundance Film Festival in January of 2017, she began a speech with “Hello, all you pussies!” and concluded with an invocation of “pussy power”. Yeah…that’s “empowering”.

Ashely Judd– also starred on a NBC series, Sisters, where George Clooney once had a guest starring role before making it big. Strong feminist who majored in “women’s studies” admitted she was harassed by a “studio mogul” in 2015, but she DID NOT NAME HIM because the work kept coming. She did out him in time to perform her “nasty woman” speech at the “Women’s March” which turned out to be a Soros funded anti-Jew group led by radical Islamists who supports Sharia Law. Eventually, Weinstein got part of her case dismissed. These NBC/Hollywood “feminists” stayed silent on the sexual predators in Hollywood in order to stay employed. Feminists? No. Enablers. Makes one wonder about her appointment in March of 2016 as ambassador to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) where she oversees population control in third world countries covered by Clooney’s “humanitarian” initiatives.

Mia Farrow – her husband, Woody Allen, left her for her adopted daughter. He met Soon Yi when she was 9. He started an affair with her when she was supposedly 21. Their adopted daughter, Dylan, claimed Allen molested her at age 7. There was a lot of “he said/she said” between Mia and Woody in the years that followed. Then their son , Ronan Farrow, published the article that led to the fall of Harvey Weinstein. He was working at NBC at the time, but he says NBC brass like news President Noah Oppenheimer would not run the story. He left and published it at the New Yorker. After seeing all of the NBC names involved with Weinstein, including all of the ones listed here as Enough Project members, it might not seem surprising as to why they would not run the story. However, Farrow’s mother is arguably one of the biggest sexual predator/pedophile enablers in Hollywood even with her defense of her daughter, yet she is also considered one of the great “feminists” and “humanitarians” much like the rest on this list.

The “Enough” Project members are not “humanitarians” who want to stop any type of violence as they have enabled it most of their careers. They like having a platform to deflect from that, though, and “human rights activism” through Soros’s Center for American “Progress” gives them that. Notice it is always the same actors who show up to “protest” at the same anti-American events? They are kept working and are paid well by these anti-American entities to do so. Who knows? Maybe there is some blackmail involved. This incestuous pop culture and “social justice” relationship is one of which Hitler and Goebbels would be proud. “Good Night and Good Luck”, indeed.

The Satellite Sentinnel Project/The Sentry

The elites pinpoint areas ripe to invoke the Responsibility to Protect based on satellite technology that shows them where the most valuable resources are located. Clooney has two of them-the Satellite Sentinel Project and The Sentry part of the CAP. He claims they are used to “keep an eye on the bad guys”. Maybe although all signs point to most likely not.

The better part of the year “humanitarian” George Clooney stumped for support for the independence referendum in South Sudan for “democracy”, CAP broadened their conquest map in Africa through the “Enough” initiative from Sudan/Darfur with the Satellite Sentinel Project which, “Through the use of satellite imagery, SSP provides an early warning system to deter mass atrocities by focusing world attention and generating rapid responses on human rights and human security concerns”. The ten year “rapid response” that followed in South Sudan has made the situation worse, not better, but Nespresso got the coffee fields and Clooney got a $40 million contract as their spokesperson. It also just so happens that in August of 2009 Soros was a shareholder in DigitalGlobal , one of the companies Clooney uses to maintain his satellite projects. It seems coincidental that George uses technology provided by the Soros family to locate the “bad guys” in areas that are always where resources such as coffee & oil (South Sudan), cobalt (Congo), and oil (Libya & Syria) are plentiful.

“The Sentry”, which was an initiative of the “Enough” project, sought to “seek to build leverage for peace and justice in Africa by helping to create real consequences for the perpetrators and facilitators of genocide and other mass atrocities”. Note the Newspeak of “The Sentry” shifted from “genocide in Africa” to “Following the money that funds atrocities and crimes against humanity in order to track and analyze how armed conflict and atrocities are financed, sustained, and monetized. The Sentry uses open source data collection, field research, and state-of-the-art network data analysis (Google & Technoserve) technology, and works in partnership with local and international civil society organizations, journalists (Media Matters, Al Jazeera), and (socialist) governments”. Who determines the impartiality in these assessments? This is from a guy funded by a billionaire who purposely dismantles economies of sovereign nations for political control and financial enrichment, whose wife’s uncle is one of the biggest arms dealers in the world, and supports the Obama/Clinton/McCain perpetual war enablers. If “The Sentry” is so concerned about following the money that funds atrocities and crimes against humanity, it would start with Clooney and his ilk. Democrats project, though, so The Sentry is a Soros/Podesta backed initiative designed not only to make George Clooney look good and to deflect from his pals but to help agenda push which is why the next question that any sane person should ask is why did The Sentry target….Australia?

George and Don Cheadle held a big press conference Monday, September 12th, 2016, in Washington D.C. regarding the results of 2 years of Sentry “kleoptocracy” research. Their focus was…Australia. They said it was because “kleptocratic” leaders of South Sudan hid out and stored their money there. However, already noted related to Australia is George’s association with Australian author of the “Responsibility to Protect” Gareth Evans. Know what happened in Australiain 2014? The “boats stopped”. The Australian version of a “conservative right wing” party took over, led by Prime Minister Tony Abbott, who stopped the “boats” of unvetted illegal immigrants. Clooney and company talked a good game about Sudan, but they were working to publicly shame Australia into opening its borders as public shaming is a part of their doctrine from “climate change” to “refugees” to “open borders” to “xenophobia”.

Vartan Gregorian (Carnegie Foundation)

Evans, Soros, Podesta and Prendergast covered satellites, “human rights” and the “Responsibility to Protect” for “refugees” as victims of “regime change”. Vartan Gregorian, Ruben Vardanyan and Sir Tom Hunter are involved in these areas, too, but focus more on the “education” and “hate specch” via “Islamaphobia” areas. There is a lot of overlap as all of these “humanitarian” organizations involve the same people, the same money, the same Newspeak, and the same outcome…to make them extremely wealthy.

Iranian Muslim Vartan Gregorian was the first non-native American citizen to become President of the Carnegie Corporation of New York. While Mr. Carnegie’s primary aim was to benefit the people of the United States, Mr. Gregorian opened the wealth flow straight to the hotbed of African cronyism. Currently, “this area of Corporation grant making focuses on selected countries in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Coincidentally, Gregorian served on the advisory board of the 2001 commission that originally founded the aforementioned “Responsibility to Protect” act. As a “non-assimilated” Muslim, he also serves on a few prominent boards to help streamline the Muslim overthrow of America smoothing over their radical ideology that runs completely contradictory to western values through “Islamophobia”, the “refugee” crisis and “education”. He is the former President of Brown University as well as having served in high ranking positions at several other ivy league schools and is very involved in the Common Core curriculum of public schools in the United States In fact, he was one of the first high ranking education officials to use the term “Islamophobia” in terms of “hate speech” to silence detractors while undermining the first amendment.

According to a book review by the Middle East Forum, Gregorian’s book Islam: A Mosaic, Not a Monolith “establishes the Islamist goal of world domination.” A chapter of the book, “Islamism: Liberation Politics,” quotes Ayatollah Khomeini: “Islam does not conquer. Islam wants all countries to become Muslim, of themselves.” Hassan al-Banna, founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, is quoted stating it “is the nature of Islam to dominate, not to be dominated, to impose its laws on all nations and to extend its power to the entire planet.” Gregorian himself recommends for Muslims a system he calls “theo-democracy,” which he defines as “a divine democratic government” that, according to the book review, “would have a limited popular sovereignty under the suzerainty of Allah.” Mr. Gregorian is thus very involved in shaping the image of Muslims in American especially since the September 11th attacks. WND reported Gregorian is closely tied to the Muslim leaders behind the controversial Islamic cultural center to be built near the site of the Sept. 11 attacks. Gregorian also serves on the board of the Sept. 11 Memorial and Museum. The museum is reportedly working with the American Society for Muslim Advancement, whose leaders are behind the mosque, to ensure the future museum will represent the voices of American Muslims. The Cordoba Initiative, which is behind the proposed mosque to be built about two blocks from the area referred to as Ground Zero, has the Carnegie Corporation, of which Gregorian is President, at the top of the list of society supporters on the Islamic group’s website. When asked about his involvement in these endeavors, he usually replies with some politically correct statement that promotes globalization. In reality what he is doing, and what his actions support, is shaming and silencing critics of Islam as he uses the “refugee crisis” to overrun the Christian majority populations of western nations.

One way Gregorian works to undermine the first amendment while silencing detractors is to identify “Islamophobia” and deem it “hate speech”. Although the term was coined in the 1990’s, “Islamophobia” did not become the focus of an active Muslim Brotherhood campaign until after 9/11. Since that time, Islamist lobby organizations, including several headed by Vartan Gregorian, have pushed the notion that Americans are deeply prejudice against Muslims, even though FBI data on hate crimes show this not to be the case. In fact, “prejudicial crimes” against Muslims have actually shown to decrease since 9/11. However, globalists never let facts get in the way of an agenda pushing opportunity. This “Islamophobia” was designed to primarily eliminate the free speech protections guaranteed by our first amendment by declaring any negative language directed towards Islam unprotected “hate speech”. According to Discover the Networks: A Guide to the Political Left:

“The term ‘Islamophobia’ was invented and promoted in the early 1990s by the International Institute for Islamic Thought (IIIT), a front group of the Muslim Brotherhood. Former IIIT member Abdur-Rahman Muhammad — who was with that organization when the word was formally created, and who has since rejected IIIT’s ideology — now reveals the original intent behind the concept of Islamophobia: ‘This loathsome term is nothing more than a thought-terminating cliché conceived in the bowels of Muslim think tanks for the purpose of beating down critics.’ In short, in its very origins, ‘Islamophobia’ was a term designed as a weapon to advance a totalitarian cause by stigmatizing critics and silencing them. This plan was an outgrowth of the Muslim Brotherhood’s ‘General Strategic Goal for North America,’ by which the organization aimed to wage ‘a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands … so that … God’s religion [Islam] is made victorious over all other religions.’ To implement this plan, the Brotherhood enlisted the help of 29 likeminded ‘organizations of our friends’ (one of which was IIIT), whose task would be to depict themselves as civil-rights groups speaking out on behalf of a Muslim American population that was allegedly besieged by outsiders who harbored an illogical, unfounded fear of them — i.e., by a society replete with ‘Islamophobia’.”

While at Brown University, Mr. Gregorian was one of the first university Presidents to expel a student for using “hate speech”. A drunken student yelled some questionable names at some other kids. The school deemed the words “unsafe” and, as such, the school felt the need to “balance free speech against freedom of fear”. No, that is not how the first amendment was designed to work. Mr. Gregorian was upset by news reports that suggested the student had been expelled because he violated university regulations governing speech. Gregorian said the rules proscribed behavior, not words, therefore it was fine. He was quite judicial with his language when he stated, “The day that Brown denies any student freedom of speech is the day that I give up my presidency of the university.” He did not give up his presidency when he should have, then, because he did deny a student’s right to free speech as protected by the first amendment. That is very subjective language and subjective interpretation of that language was used to kick that kid out of school. That was in 1991. Look where we are now. We live in an era of “safe zones” from “hate speech” on higher education campuses. “Free speech” means “the speech which the left authorizes”. Canada and the U.K. have passed bills criminalizing “Islamophobic hate speech”.

Similarly, Democrats in the U.S. are serious in using it to curtail our first amendment rights. House Resolution 569 was introduced on December 17, 2015 with “its self-described purpose is ‘condemning violence, bigotry, and hateful rhetoric towards Muslims in the United States’.” Democrats have been trying to ban what they deem hate speech and now plan to exploit Muslims to achieve their goals as an excuse to put in laws that damage or destroy the First Amendment. Their first priority when retaking the House in 2019 was to pass a speech restricting bill opposed by even the Anti Civil Liberties Union. The legislation “purports to reform campaign finance with a series of vague, sweeping measures that will act to chill speech when they don’t actively regulate or squelch it. HR 1 is called the For the People Act but would be more aptly titled The Be Careful What You Say, It Might Be Illegal Act.” Of course, they use this an a opportunity to declare war on “big Citizen United type money” in politics in the form of donations and Super PACs, but as the Institute for Free Speech notes, “the bill affects a much broader array of ‘trade associations, unions, business groups and advocacy organizations, such as Planned Parenthood and the National Right to Life Committee’.” It would not affect “humanitarian” organizations that act as Super PAC’s like The Center for American “Progress” and Media Matters.

As for public education, Gregorian’s influence financially and philosophically go much deeper. Obama’s mentor, domestic Weather Underground terrorist Bill Ayers, received $49.2 million in startup capital for an education-reform project from Vartan Gregorian, a board member of the Qatar Foundation, which, as reported in 2012, has close ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and was started by the former Emir of Qatar and founder of Al Jazeera news network, Sheikh Hamad Bin Khalifa Al Thani. Qatar has gained access to America’s K-12 students through other education programs as well. For example, Qatar Foundation International’s “flagship” Arabic Language and Culture program is offered in several US schools and districts. In addition, Gregorian is an integral part of “Connect All Schools”, through which Qatar invested $5 million to teach not just Arabic in American public schools but to clean up radical Islam’s image. For example, at Alice Deal Middle School in Washington, DC, students connected with Israel, Saudi Arabia, and Syria for a lesson that examined “how the media in the U.S. stereotypes Muslims in a negative light.” Note the “image cleanup” involves American changing their tune, not Islam doing anything about its radicalism. In an effort to alert these schools to the fact that Qatar is a “pernicious sponsor of Islamic terror,” Col. Allen West, Frank Gaffney, Jr. of the Center for Security Policy, and Pamela Geller of Atlas Shrugs, joined with several others to start the Qatar Awareness Campaign. According to the group: “Qatar is arguably the preeminent sponsor of terror in the world today. It is a benefactor of the genocidal armies of ISIS, al Qaeda, and Boko Haram; it is involved in Taliban narcotics trafficking through a relationship with the Pakistani National Logistics Cell; and profits from operating a virtual slave state. Qatar has leveraged its relationships with violent jihadi groups to its own benefit, and to the detriment of the United States and her allies.” Along with the Connect All Schools initiative, Gregorian has enabled Qatar’s access to America’s K-12 students to push their message.

In addition, former National Endowment for the Humanities Chairman Jim Leach seemed to use the NEA to “propagandize for the Obama administration’s wishful thinking about Islam”. Leach saw Obama’s much-vaunted Cairo speech as the blueprint for what the NEH should be doing, as he made clear in this fawning address to the Carnegie Corporation, and numerous Endowment initiatives followed, including the Bridging Cultures initiative, and the Muslim Journeys Bookshelf. Scott Johnson of Powerline notes, “Consider the Muslim Journeys Bookshelf that Leach foisted on the Endowment, with the support of a $1.2 million grant from the Carnegie Corporation. Carnegie is an organization run by Vartan Gregorian, under whose leadership Carnegie has become deeply invested in Islam-related initiatives”. Leach thus converted the NEH into a vehicle of propaganda because, upon further review, an NEH source familiar with the project has explained that the grant was awarded by Carnegie to the NEH with the unwritten (but completely understood) provision that there were to be “no books or voices critical of Islam and the dangerous Islamist tendencies within Islam.” Gregorian helps censor reading content through the power of the purse where his education grants are concerned. When asked about the exclusion, NEH political flack Eva Caldera stated those books were already “widely available.” This banning of books fits well with how the left supports “free speech” as long as it is speech of which they approve.

The last point regarding Gregorian’s Islamafication “contribution” to education involves Pearson Education which designs “education products and services to institutions, governments and direct to individual learners”. This company has the biggest contracts with the Gates Foundation to provide textbooks for the Common Core curriculum and its contents. Since the Common Core curriculum was designed by 12 politicians and special interests, not local school boards, parents, educators, and education specialists, Pearson is the perfect fit for this crony contract to push Islam, and it does as a pillar of the Common Core Social Studies Standards. In addition, Pearson is listed on the London and New York Stock Exchange with the Libyan Investment Authority as its largest financial contributor, holding 26 million shares. According to the Financial Times, the Libyan Investment Authority was founded by Muammar Gaddafi’s son, Saif al-Islam and more than five Gaddafi family members own shares. The Council on Islamic Relations (CAIR), Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and the Muslim Brotherhood are invested in Pearson Education through the Libyan Investment Authority. Oh…that son of Gaddafi? We know him as an affiliate of the Lockerbie bomber. Yes a proven terrorist who has blown up innocent western women and children in a Scottish terror attack has a vested interest in the future of America’s children.Additionally, the lawyer who not only saved him from execution but eventually got him freed from prison for he could run for the leader of Libya in 2019 is none other than Amal Clooney.

Coincidentally (or not), George Soros embarked on “opposition research” during the Gregorian years on certain critics of radical Islam. A 2011 document entitled “Extreme Polarization and Breakdown in Civil Discourse” lamented that progressive groups and members of the Arab, Middle Eastern, Muslim, and South Asian-American (AMEMSA) community lacked “high quality opposition research to combat anti-Muslim xenophobia and to promote tolerance”. To close that gap, Soros’s Open Society Foundation sought to provide a grant to CAP. The CAP project, called the “Examining Anti-Muslim Bigotry Project”, set out to engage progressives and journalists to raise awareness about the critics of radical Islam. OSF’s 2011 tax filings show that it “gave CAP a $200,000 grant as well as two others totaling $500,000.” Also in 2011, CAP issued a 132 page report titled Fear, Inc.: The Roots of the Islamophobia Network in America. This publication’s stated objective was to “expose and marginalize the influence of the ‘sinister’, ‘hateful’, ‘purposely deceptive’, ‘bigoted’, and ‘racist’ individual groups that, according to CAP, are part of an ‘Islamophobia network in America’.’ These include what CAP describes as ‘misinformation experts’, ‘anti-Muslim bigot’, ‘political players’, ‘right wing media’, ‘religious right zealots’, and ‘radical ideologues’ who intentionally ‘mischaracterize Islam’, ‘peddle hate and fear of Muslims’ and ‘rave about the overhyped dangers’ of Sharia, so as to ‘fan the flames of Islamophobia’. As with other “socially just” language, interpretation of these terms is completely subjective meaning they can be used against anyone at any time for any reason. This definition as written covers anyone who questions, especially after 9/11, the influx of unvented “refugees” into their neighborhoods as they watched the rise of ISIS, which thrived in the vacuum left in Libya after the “Responsibility to Protect” enabled failed regime change by Madame Secretary Clinton and the Obama administration. Established in 2013, by the end of Obama’s second term in December of 2016, the “JV team” had, according to CNN, “conducted or inspired more than 140 terrorist attacks in 29 countries other than Iraq and Syria, where its carnage has taken a much deadlier toll. Those attacks have killed at least 2,043 people and injured thousands more.” This led to a “refugee crisis” that saw boatloads of Muslims leave Libya for the west where they demanded unlimited and unvetted entry to the nations in which they landed. No one could question their motives for fear of being charged with “Islamophobia” especially by media members who took money from Soros/Gregorian entities, including Gregorian’s daughter in law, Maggie Haberman of The New York Times.

The 2011 Islam push in the U.S. continued in a number of other ways. First off, in September, Soros looked to expand his operations in Egypt via the Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights, which is run in partnership with the Open Society Justice Initiative. The group sought to develop a national network of legal empowerment actors for referral of “public-interest law cases”. Such organizations in the past have helped represent Muslim Brotherhood leaders seeking election or more authority in the country. The EIPR was founded by Hossam Bahgat, who was at one time detained in Egypt as were the “Al Jazeera Three”, one of whom Amal Clooney eventually “represents”. Al Jazeera, the most popular “news” channel in the Arab world, plays a prominent role in the dissemination of propaganda for the Clooney agenda as it is owned by the Qatari government, a state sponsor of terror most notably ISIS that supports of the Muslim Brotherhood worldwide. This same Qatar has been noted as a primary funding source for the Common Core curriculum with Gregorian’s blessing. Additionally, many of Amal’s cases deal with the Muslim Brotherhood, and her mother was in 2011 a “journalist” for Al Jazeera. Spreading radical Muslim propaganda while demonizing the west, especially the United States and Israel, is the Clooney’s job through “pop culture”. Soros and Gregorian do it though “education” and “media”. Consequently, the George Soros-funded Social Science Research Council, along with the Edward R. Murrow College of Communication at Washington State University, received $50,000 from the Open Society Institute as one of the groups behind a new course on Islam designed for journalists which tries to minimize the impact and importance of “jihad” by comparing it to the number of murders in America each year. Remember Edward R Murrow? He was the “journalist” hero of Clooney’s Good Night and Good Luck as Senator Joseph McCarthy was profiled as a radical Republican on a “witch hunt” looking for communists in the media and Hollywood that he thought were using pop culture to send communist messages to the public. Amazing that, almost 70 years after McCarthy/Murrow and almost 15 years after the Participant Media backed Clooney hit piece, we find ourselves on the other side of a “witch hunt” against a sitting US President led by a now openly socialist “democrat” party, which is also endorsed by the Communist Party, that is funded and backed by almost everyone in Hollywood, with George Clooney for a time one of it’s political “leaders”. In fact, eventually, the case will be made that the Clooneys are at the center of the ongoing episode in American history currently referred to as “Spygate” and “The Russian Collusion Hoax”.

That same course in keeping with Newspeak claims “right-wing activists” tried to tie American Muslims to terrorism and does not mention examples of Islamic attacks on press freedom. That fits with a theme for liberal financier Soros, who has spent more than $52 million on influencing the media. The Islamic course “also links to another Soros-funded entity, the well-financed Center for American Progress.” In about 30 pages of text with links to other reports and articles, journalists can go through and read about the history of Islam, Muslims in America, and how to cover stories on Islam. Besides learning basic facts about Muslims and their history, the course adds ways to put ”jihad into perspective, attack conservatives, and provide a list of liberal groups that can be contacted for expert advice and quotes.” The manipulation of the press/media and public education to formulate the west as intolerant Islamophobes who will not open their borders to help “refugees” as a modern day McCarthy witchhunt was well underway.

Anti Sharia bills? Sharia law, the Islamic system of moral codes that govern all aspects of Muslim life, runs in direct contradiction to the rights guaranteed to us in the Constitution. As Muslims get “elected” to office, Sharia Law is becoming mainstreamed with the likes of Jew hater Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, one of Obama’s “redistributed refugees” from Somalia. In fact, every Muslim who has been elected to office is a democrat (and the one GOP listed here is from CA, so he might as well be a democrat), and most achieved their positions under Obama’s “refugee resettlement” era. As our immigration laws were not enforced during the Obama era to allow for the “humanitarian” resettlement of “illegal” “refugees” and as “amnesty”, although ruled illegal by two federal judges, had been pushed by the Obama administration as “humanitarian”, our border eroded as attacks on our soil by radical Muslim extremists increased. The same could be said throughout every country in Europe. While normal, rational thinking Americans and Europeans understand that not all Muslims are terrorists, it cannot be said that all these attacks were not done by radicalized Muslims. Irrelevant, though, as the globalists have jumped on these attacks to push that ALL Americans–well, gun owning and Christian Bible belt “clingers”—conservatives–are Islamophobic. See how that Newspeak crafting works? This all lends more credibility to the “replacement population” agenda of Gregorian and Soros of which the Clooneys are the UN face.

Chapter 3: Establishing Clooney’s “Humanitarianism” in Africa

On July 14, 2004, the “Save Darfur Coalition” was founded at the Darfur Emergency Summit at CUNY Graduate Center in NYC. In January of 2005, the Comprehensive Peace Agreement between the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM) and the Government of Sudan was signed. Somewhere in 2005, Clooney was chosen to head the UN “humanitarian efforts” in Sudan. Why? To help mold the “human rights” narrative needed to facilitate the use of the “Responsibility to Protect” doctrine, which was adopted by a UN World Summit in September of 2005. According to “George Clooney’s War: The Filmstar’s Activism in Sudan”, “A UN World Summit in 2005 adopted humanitarian

intervention – the “Responsibility to Protect”, or R2P – as official UN doctrine. R2P enshrined in international law both the reason and duty for humanitarian intervention. A nation would henceforth forfeit its sovereignty if it committed or was unable to prevent massive human rights abuses on its soil. In such circumstances, the outside world could, and must, take action to stem the disaster through diplomacy, sanctions or, if needed, military force.” The “R2P” calls for the use of global police force as such as the need determined by the UN. This article seeks to “clarify the current legal status of a particular aspect of the ‘responsibility to protect’ principle—the idea that bystander states have a collective responsibility to protect populations beyond borders from mass atrocities when host states fail to do so. It outlines the development of this idea and argues that, while the legal force of key international statements on the ‘responsibility to protect’ principle may be weak at best, the International Court of Justice and the International Law Commission have offered bold declarations in recent years which do point towards the gradual development of legal duties for the extraterritorial protection of populations.” In effect, if the UN does not like the way a country is being run, it can claim it has a “responsibility to protect” it’s citizens from themselves and their government by suspending it’s’ sovereignty/borders and taking over. “Sovereignty”, “democracy”, “human rights”….these are just words used as language manipulation to appeal to the emotion of low informed voters to justify their wrongdoings.

It is not surprising, then, to find out that:

“Philanthropist billionaire George Soros is a primary funder and key proponent of the global organization that promotes the military doctrine used by the Obama administration to justify the recent airstrikes targeting the regime of Moammar Gadhafi in Libya. The Responsibility to Protect doctrine has been described by its founders and proponents, including Soros, as promoting global governance while allowing the international community to penetrate a nation state’s borders under certain conditions. Libya regarded as test of global doctrine… The joint U.S. and international air strikes targeting Libya are widely regarded as a test of Responsibility to Protect ­ which is a set of principles, now backed by the United Nations, based on the idea that sovereignty is not a privilege, but a responsibility. According to the principle, any state’s sovereignty can be overrun, including with the use of military force, if the international community decides it must act to halt what it determines to be genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity or ethnic cleansing. The term “war crimes” has at times been indiscriminately used by various U.N.-backed international bodies, including the International Criminal Court, or ICC, which applied it to Israeli anti-terror operations in the Gaza Strip. There has been fear the ICC could be used to prosecute U.S. troops. An organization calling itself the Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect is the world’s leading champion of the doctrine.

Activist Gareth Evans, who sits on the global group’s advi