This is some early bookstore research, which is the start of a set of (hopefully useful) dictionary reviews. I went to two large bookstores (The enormous Half Price Books and the equally enormous Barnes & Noble in Dallas) and wrote down the names of pretty-much every dictionary they had in every language they carried, and also noted whether they included pronunciation information (and if so, whether it was IPA, some formal system (pinyin, romaji), some random system they invented, or some terrible English approximation [Bawn-JOOR]). I’ve tried to provide Amazon links to as many dictionaries as possible.

Here’s the info I’d like to add:

More dictionaries

Whether or not the dictionaries include examples of the words in use (sentences and their translations or translations of little, 2-4 word phrases)

Any other features that might make you seriously consider one dictionary over any other.

If you have some of this info about one of the dictionaries I have listed here, or another dictionary you own, send me an email. I intend to keep updating this list with reader input. I’m using Amazon’s “Look inside!” function as much as possible, but it’s not always available. See the end of this post if you have a dictionary that isn’t on this list.

Index: Spanish | French | German | Italian | Portuguese | Russian | Chinese | Japanese | Korean | Arabic | Hebrew | Greek | Welsh | Finnish | Persian | Hindi | Swahili | Burmese

Spanish

Dictionaries with IPA transcriptions

None of these have many examples of the words in context, so if you have a dictionary you prefer on that front, let me know!

Dictionaries with phonetic information (not IPA)

These two dictionaries either use their own phonetic transcription methods or English approximations for Spanish (Cervantes = Serr-VAHN-tees). I find these confusing and misleading at best.

Harper Collins College Edition (Some terrible in-house system)

Easy Spanish Bilingual (Serrvahn-tees)

Dictionaries without any phonetic info at all

These dictionaries didn’t give you phonetic information. I suppose that this is acceptable for a very phonetic language like Spanish, but still, it seems like one of the basic functions of a dictionary to tell you how to pronounce an unknown word. Just for interest’s sake, I’ve noted whenever they’ve included phonetic transcriptions of the English half of the dictionary, and what sort of transcriptions they used for that. I’m hoping to eventually see some patterns across the major publishers.

Mini Collins School Spanish

Collins Spanish-English

American Heritage 2nd Edition Spanish-English (English - Other)

Oxford/Duden Pictoral Spanish-English

Geddes & Grosset Spanish-English

Random House Essential Spanish

Langenscheidt Spanish-English (English - IPA)

Oxford Pocket Spanish-English

Oxford (Big) - (English - IPA)

Webster New Explorer Spanish-English

Cassell’s Spanish-English

Webster’s Family Spanish-English (English - IPA)

Webster’s (Tiny) G+

VOX (English - Other)

Collins Easy Learning Spanish-English

Merriam Webster’s (w/ Latin American) (English - IPA)

Longman Pocket Spanish-English (blue)

Wordsworth Spanish-English

U of Chicago (English - Very accurate IPA)

Laxton Spanish-English

Cervantes-Walls Spanish-English

Collins Word-for-Word Spanish-English (Really not a fan of this one)

Larousse Concise Spanish-English (English - IPA)

Larousse Pocket Spanish-English (English - IPA)

Larousse Pocket Student Spanish-English (English - IPA)

French

Dictionaries with IPA transcriptions

French has a great many dictionaries with IPA transcriptions. They’ve really embraced the IPA, perhaps because the IPA came out of Paris in the first place.

Dictionaries without any phonetic info at all

These dictionaries didn’t give you phonetic information. This seems ridiculous for French. Even if you learn all of the spelling rules, you still need to know whether certain final letters are pronounced, at the very least. I’d avoid these unless you needed something special (I could see a specialized business dictionary being useful, but still, the lack of phonetic info is pretty lame)

Collins Easy Learning

Collin’s Beginner’s French (White medium-size)

Harrap’s French-English Business

Oxford-Duden Pictorial

Oxford School

Cassell’s Beginner’s Dictionary

German

Dictionaries with IPA transcriptions

Oxford-Duden

Concise Oxford-Duden

Collins Concise (Careful here; the normal edition of Collins German/English doesn’t have any phonetic info. I’m fairly confident that this links to a new edition same one I saw)

Langenscheidt

Berlitz (I’d avoid buying German Berlitz dictionaries online, only because they have so many different dictionaries with different content in each one. The one I saw with IPA was relatively large, and seemed like a fine dictionary, but I saw two different pocket Berlitz dictionaries, one without any phonetic info (blue, short and thick) and another (taller/thinner) with some terrible in-house transcription system)

Dictionaries without any phonetic info at all

These dictionaries didn’t give you phonetic information. German has reliable phonetic rules, but the same argument for Spanish holds here. What are dictionaries for, if not to give you all the info you might want on a word?

Collins German (Names only in IPA)

Larousse (English - IPA)

Pocket Oxford-Duden (English - IPA)

Everyday, McGraw Hill (English - IPA)

Collins German (Compact) (English - IPA)

Cassell’s

Oxford Berkley Reference (Brown) (English - IPA)

Mirriam-Webster (small) (English - Other)

Webster’s New Word (Names in IPA)

Oxford Mini (English - IPA)

Berlitz Pocket (Stout, thicker blue version)

Italian

Dictionaries with IPA transcriptions

Dictionaries with phonetic information (not IPA)

These were a mixture. Italy hasn’t embraced the IPA because their language is already very phonetic, but there’s still some information missing (namely whether zz is pronounced [ddz] or [tts] and whether stressed O’s and E’s are open or closed vowels). Some dictionaries have come up with their own ways of notating these two phonetic features that aren’t clearly shown in the original Italian word. This seems fine to me (except for the World-Wide Fawcett)

Penguin Concise (A few useful small markings)

Collins Zanichelli: Il Ragazzini (A few useful small markings)

World-Wide Fawcett (Terrible transcriptions)

Dictionaries without any phonetic info at all

These dictionaries didn’t give you phonetic information. As mentioned above, you need some phonetic info in Italian, so I don’t really understand why you’d make a dictionary without it. Boo.

Collins Beginners Italian (Medium white)

Langenscheidt (Tiny) (English - IPA)

Berlitz Compact (medium blue)

Berlitz (Tiny) (English - IPA)

Oxford New (Medium green) (Only stress markings)

Russian

Dictionaries with phonetic information (not IPA)

Russian has not embraced the IPA at all, but they have a very phonetic alphabet, and there don’t seem to be any other options, so for now, you’re kind of stuck. (If someone has found a Russian dictionary with pronunciation info, please let me know!) All dictionaries do provide stress information, which is the main thing you need to accurately pronounce a word, once you’ve internalized the alphabet and the phonetic rules of Russian.

Harper Collins (Slim pickings on Amazon! This is a major publisher, so I’m not sure why…)

Langenscheidt (English - IPA) (Sort of skimpy, one-word definitions)

Pocket Oxford (blue) (English - IPA)

Concise Oxford (Provides a fair bit of info on word forms, perfective/imperfective verb pairs, etc. I’d go for this one of the group I’ve seen)

New Russian-English Dictionary (Dover Dual Language Russian)(This one is cool for the English section; every English word is written out in Russian letters as a sort of phonetic transcription of the English. The Russian content is relatively good, although I like the feel of the Concise Oxford better)

Katzner (This is a solid contender for the #1 slot here. Has some in depth explanations and the English-Russian section is one of the best I’ve seen)

Chinese

Dictionaries with phonetic information (not IPA)

Chinese dictionaries tend to use Pinyin transcriptions, which are nice and standardized.

Japanese

Dictionaries with phonetic information (not IPA)

Japanese dictionaries tend to use Romaji transcriptions, but there are a few different Romaji transcription methods, so you’ll see the same word written in a few different ways. The first 4 seem to mostly contain 1-word definitions.

Dictionaries without any phonetic information Oxford Beginner Japanese Dictionary

Korean

Dictionaries with phonetic information (not IPA)

Korean dictionaries tend to use various transcription methods, which don’t seem particularly standardized, but also don’t seem particularly terrible or misleading.

Arabic

Dictionaries with IPA transcriptions

There was only ONE dictionary in the two stores I visited with IPA info for Arabic, and I cannot find the same edition on Amazon! It was a small blue Collins dictionary, and I believe that it’s an earlier edition of this one. If anyone can confirm, please let me know:

Dictionaries with phonetic information (not IPA)

Periplus Pocket Arabic (They use their own in-house transcription method)

The Hans Wehr Dictionary of Modern Written Arabic (This seems to be the dictionary of choice on Amazon. Fine in-house transcription method, pretty good explanations.) [Not in the bookstores I visited]

Dictionaries without any phonetic information Oxford Essential

Concise Oxford (Strange choices here: There was no way to look up a word in Arabic)

Hippocrene Standard (And here there was no way to look up a word in English.) Hebrew Didn’t find much, and what I found wasn’t particularly impressive. Would appreciate recommendations here. Honorable mention: The Oxford English-Hebrew dictionary only goes in the English->Hebrew direction, but it does have a large number of example sentences. Not bad. Dictionaries with phonetic information (not IPA) Webster’s New World Dictionar (Some odd, confusing transcription method) Dictionaries without phonetic information Ben Yehuda’s Pocket Dictionary Greek In sore need of resources here! Just one dictionary in the two bookstores, and it’s not particularly good. Dictionaries without phonetic information Pocket Oxford Welsh

Dictionaries without any phonetic information

No phonetic info on any individual words. Lame. You’ll need to rely on pronunciation guides.

Oxford Modern Welsh Dictionary (Actually pretty neat dictionary, except for the lacking pronunciation info. Lots of examples.) [Not in the bookstores I visited]

Teach Yourself Welsh Dictionary (meh)

Essential Welsh Dictionary (meh)

Finnish

Dictionaries with phonetic information (not IPA)

Slim pickings for Finnish. One Langenscheidt dictionary with HEER-teh-hee-nehn type transcriptions.

Persian

Dictionaries with phonetic information (not IPA)

Slim pickings for Persian, too. One Hippocrene concise dictionary with some odd, relatively confusing transcription method.

Hindi

Dictionaries with phonetic information (not IPA)

Hippocrene Hindi-English dictionary (This one seemed fine, if a little concise. Relatively straightforward transcription method and short definitions)