The tribe awaits word from a federal judge as to whether it can continue to offer blackjack at its casinos. According to the state, the tribe's ability to have blackjack expired and has to be hashed out in a new agreement. But the tribe contends that state regulators allowed pari-mutuel casinos to operate so-called "designated player games" that, the tribe argues, violate exclusivity agreements because they are for all practical purposes the same as blackjack.