911Debate.org

Upcoming Debates about September 11, 2001

from various perspectives and professions

Those who know the truth are confident to speak publicly in debate

"Encourage substantive debate on the evidence by knowledgeable proponents of all points of view."

Dr. Carl Sagan in his Baloney Detection Kit The Sage Sagans

Sagan's Debating Tips - Logical Fallacies to be aware of and avoid

We support open debate about 9/11

"The way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion,

but allow very lively debate within that spectrum." Noam Chomsky (PhD, MIT Professor)

Note: Richard Gage presented the Collected Articles On Nine Eleven to Dr. Chomsky

Requirement: PhD in Physics and Hirsch Index >= 9.11

Prize winner gets the higher of .00911 Bitcoin (budget $91.11)

Nominations: debate@ANETA.org

2014 debate - David Griscom, PhD, Brown

2015 debate - David Griscom PhD, Brown

2016 Debate - Crockett Grabbe, PhD, CalTech

2017 Debate - Steven Jones, PhD, Vanderbilt

2018 Debate - David Chandler, MS, CalPolyTech

2019 Debate - Crockett Grabbe, PhD, CalTech

Steve De'ak and Dr. James Fetzer

April 2, 2019 10:00 - midnight EST. De'ak vs Dr. Fetzer debate on 9/11

www.revisionmedia.org . Bring your popcorn Call in: (855) 492-6049

https://beforeitsnews.com/v3/9-11-and-ground-zero/2019/2442520.html

March 14, 2019 - Einstein's Birthday

6th Annual 9/11 Physics Debate

Broadcast on Dr. Kevin Barrett 's radio show

https://www.patreon.com/posts/9-11-physics-for-25514987 audio

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CkIe8bTlvFU video

Debate Resolution: The Bush Story of 9/11 about the complete collapse of

the World Trade Center towers violated Newton's Laws of Motion

Now accepting qualified nominations to debate

Dr. Crockett Grabbe (PhD, Physics, CalTech)

Author of 13 books including "How the WTC was Really Demolished"

Anatomy of Mass Murders and National Swindle of the World Trade Center

Who was ACE Elevator Company - working in the shafts 1994-2001/9/11

Over 1000 scientific publications from over 40 years of research

Challenger Requirements: 1) PhD in Physics from an accredited university

2) At least 10 papers published in independent scientific research journals

3) Hirsch Index or i10 Index of at least 10

3) Membership in the American Physical Society or international equivalent

Qualified candidates who want to defend the Bush Story of 9/11 (BS911)

please respond with curriculum vitae to Rick Shaddock Rick@ANETA.org

The winner, decided by vote of the physicists invited from 28 universities and 2 societies

(click graphic on left) will receive .911 Bitcoin Cash (BCH), around a value of US$119.



Dr. Grabbe also won in 2016

http://noliesradio.org/archives/111778

www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFJvoDRXhE8

video about the Invitations

http://sealane.org/books/AMMed2/adcopies/adcopy4

March 14 is also Lana Lokteff's birthday

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lana_Lokteff



Redice.TV

9/11 Physics Debate for 2018

Accepting nominations for a challenger to debate Physics and Mathematics

Professor David Chandler, Master of Science, California Polytechnic University

Coordinator for ScientistsFor911Truth.org

911SpeakOut.org more videos by Professor Chandler

Basic physics experiments prove 9/11 was an Inside Job

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8QLyum1gxBc

Debate Resolution: The Bush Story of 9/11 about the complete collapse of

the World Trade Center towers violated Newton's Laws of Motion

Therefore, we need a new, scientific, official investigation.

Debate challengers must be a Professor of Physics or at least a

Masters degree in Physics from an accredited university

or Hirsch Index >= 5

Professor David Chandler wins the 9/11 Physics Debate for 2018

https://kevinbarrett.heresycentral.com/2018/03/5thdebate

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1dLg_6SlIY

No Lies Radio Show to Debate@ANETA.org

2014 debate

2015 debate

2016 Debate

2017 Debate

2018 Debate

Honorarium prize is .00911 Bitcoin sponsored by the Shaddock Foundation

and Association for Nine Eleven Truth Awareness

Dr. Steven Jones

PhD, Physics, Vanderbilt, Professor Emeritus, BYU, h=13

Articles published in independent peer reviewed journals questioning 9/11

Debate Resolution: The Bush Story of 9/11 about the complete collapse of

the World Trade Center towers violated Newton's Laws of Motion

Therefore, we need a new, scientific, official investigation.

Accepting challengers with a PhD in Physics and Hirsch >=10

to debate on Dr. Kevin Barrett's No Lies Radio show. Email to rick@aneta.org

March 14, 2016 - Einstein's Birthday

3rd Annual 9/11 Physics Debate



Broadcast on Dr. Kevin Barrett 's radio show http://noliesradio.org/archives/111778

www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFJvoDRXhE8Debate Resolution: The Bush Story of 9/11 about the complete collapse of

the World Trade Center towers violated Newton's Laws of Motion

Now accepting qualified nominations to debate

Dr. Crockett Grabbe (PhD, Physics, CalTech)

Author of 13 books including "How the WTC was Really Demolished"

Anatomy of Mass Murders and National Swindle of the World Trade Center

Who was ACE Elevator Company - working in the shafts 1994-2001/9/11

Over 1000 scientific publications from over 40 years of research

Challenger Requirements: 1) PhD in Physics from an accredited university

2) At least 10 papers published in independent scientific research journals

3) Hirsch Index or i10 Index of at least 10

3) Membership in the American Physical Society or international equivalent

Qualified candidates who want to defend the Bush Story of 9/11 (BS911)

please respond with curriculum vitae to Rick Shaddock Rick@ANETA.org

The winner, decided by vote of the physicists invited from 28 universities and 2 societies

(click graphic on left) will receive .911 Bitcoin, up to a value of US$1000, for charity.

video about the Invitations

http://sealane.org/books/AMMed2/adcopies/adcopy4

www.physics911.ca - by Professor A. K. Dewdney

Advertising for a challenger

for the 9/11 Physics Debate Invitations have been emailed with a follow up phone call to the

physics departments of the following universities and societies. Messages have been posted on www.911Mensa.com

(High IQ Society) forum www.InternationalSkeptics.com

(formerly JREF, disowned by Randi)



www.SkepticForum.org

(Michael Shermer's) thread Continued debate discussion:

Skeptiko-forum.com/threads/9-11-discussion-thread

(founder: Alex Tsakiris)

individual email addresses available albany.edu

arizona.edu

asu.edu

berkeley.edu

brown.edu

buffalo.edu

caltech.edu

carnegiemellon.edu

colgate.edu

columbia.edu cornell.edu

dartmouth.edu

harvard.edu

hmc.edu

hobart.edu

iastate.edu

ithaca.edu

mum.edu

umd.edu

mit.edu

oxford.edu upenn.edu

princeton.edu

rit.edu

stanford.edu

ttu.edu

villanova.edu

wpi.edu

yale.edu

aps.org

dpg-physik.de

9/11 Professional Engineers Debate Proposal

Challenging any PhD in Engineering, PE, or SE to a debate about the collapse of the WTC towers on 9/11

World Trade Center

Building 7

Experiment and Evaluation Project www.WTC7evaluation.org An independent and open scientific investigation of the collapse of World Trade Center 7 on 9/11. Class photos

youtube.com/watch?v=R-zPna-OI70 Professor Leroy Hulsey, Ph.D.

Doctorate in Structural Engineering

PE - Professional Engineer

SE - Structural Engineer Chairman

Department of Civil Engineering

University of Alaska, Fairbanks

Outstanding Teaching Awards

UAF, UMR, NCSU

Interested and qualified PhD, PE or SE please send CV to info@ANETA.org

Dr. Griscom Wins Again in 2015



Click here for the audio

NASA, DARPA, and U.S. Navy Physicist http://noliesradio.org/archives/96719

The 9/11 Physics Debate was first announced on January 11, 2014.

For the 2nd year, no PhDs in Physics have come forward to defend the

Official Conspiracy Theory (OCT) - the Bush Story of 9/11 (BS911).

9/11 Truth Outreach Extends Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth’s

Debate Challenge to Colleges and Universities

https://www.911truthoutreach.org/557-news-releases/374-debate-challenge-to-colleges-and-universities.html



The Challenge is for $500 and is open to tenured professors in schools of physical science, architecture or engineering to publicly endorse and explain NIST's NCSTAR 1A analysis. Tenured professors who would champion the NCSTAR 1A analysis as technically sound are invited to apply.

The flyer is here:

https://www.911truthoutreach.org/610-afrikaans/download/201_c438eb392bf69355024d80ca3ecd9e9a.html

Press TV: Sabrosky vs. Budowsky

9/11 Debate between Dr. Alan Sabrosky (USMC) and Brent Bukowsky

www.presstv.com/Detail/2015/09/11/428771/September-11-attacks-14th-anniv-aftermath-US-terror-refugees



Former link: http://www.veteranstruthnetwork.com/index.php/false-flags/item/412-press-tv-9-11-debate-alan-sabrosky-vs-brent-budowsky

Brent at 10 minute point: "Well, I'm always suspicious of everything in a situation like this.

I'm always on the look out about everything in this kind of a thing...

I'd like to hear what anyone else thinks actually happened."

Because, believe me, I've read all the conspiracy theories." (Here is a list.)

Kenneth O'Keefe's Debate Challenge

Mark Ragev

Spokesman Israel's Prime Minister's Office (PMO)

https://youtu.be/S10Aotp_tvo?t=1150 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Regev www.timesofisrael.com/prime-ministers-office Kenneth O'Keefe

U.S. Marine Corps - now a Peace Activist



Let me also extend an open invitation to Israeli, British, and American government representatives so as to challenge me on on any point I make on this program or future programs, with a special invitation to Israeli spokesperson Mark Ragev, who I will devote an entire program to one-on-one debate, if he has the courage to take me up on it. The first thing to discuss about 9/11 is the fact that this event is quite possibly the greatest mind control event in human history. 20:07

Poll after poll makes it very clear that more and more people to not trust the official account of 9/11. 21:19

Despite all the mass media deception, people are seeing straight through the lies and regaining the capacity to think and process information intelligently. This is absolutely critical. 21:40

R osie's 9/11 Debate on The View

I do believe it defies Physics for the World Trade Center Tower 7, Building7, which collapsed in on itself.

It is impossible for a building to fall the way it fell without explosives being involved.

World Trade Building 7. WTC 1 and 2 got hit by planes.

Seven, miraculously, for the first time in history steel was melted by fire. It is physically impossible.

Get a physics expert here from Yale, from Harvard. Pick the school. It defies reason.

Rosie O'Donnell on The View www.youtube.com/watch?v=oNl964zavcA 5:00 min.

www.ANETA.org/AE911Truth/petition/summary/universities

There should be 1000's of physicists clamoring to defend the U.S. Government story.

It would show patriotism, and might even help them get Government research grants.

But where are they? Who will debate Dr. David Griscom on behalf of the BS911?

9/11 Engineering Debate



Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth is offering credentialed building professionals a 9/11 Debate Challenge — an opportunity to publicly endorse the National Construction Safety Team Act Report 1A (NCSTAR 1A), titled Final Report on the Collapse of the World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7) and published in November 2008 by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The winner will be determined by audience vote

and will receive $1000 for the charity of his choice Sponsored by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth Credentialed Professionals Need Only Apply To respond: DebateChallenge@AE911Truth.org

Wayne Coste, P.E. Board Member of AE911Truth ae911truth.org/en/news-section/911-debate-challenge

Foreign Policy Debate



Michael Lane

Founder of the American Institute for Foreign Policy Art Olivier

Engineer and Candidate for California Governor www.presstv.ir/live.html September 11, 2014

Plane / No Plane Debate

Resolved: Two large planes hit the World Trade Center

www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_x7-W4mndc July 18, 2013

wwwANETA.org/planes/FetzerEastman

Arguing the Negative Arguing the Affirmative

Dr. James Fetzer

Dick Eastman

9/11 Debate on C-SPAN

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sjj03pvlbq4 - May 7, 2012

Howard Stern and Jesse Ventura

Howard Stern

debated JFK, 9/11, and other issues

www.youtube.com/watch?v=yveSDrS_VX8



9/11 Debate: Popular Mechanics vs. Loose Change

www.youtube.com/watch?v=stVmEmJ666M

Norma Rae

"All Theories Welcomed" Facebook group administrator

https://facebook.com/goups/911AllTheories

Supports No Plane theory Rick Shaddock

"All Theories Not Welcomed - Except Norma's" Facebook forum

https://facebook.com/goups/911AllTheoriesNot

Supports simple Remote Control Take Over theory

911 Computer Consultants Debate

Frank of JREF vs Rick of ANETA Frank and Rick have been friends since 1985

both working as computer consultants in Washington DC

and for the Military Industrial Intelligence Complex. They agree on many things such as the value of computers and meditation,

yet they disagree dramatically about 9/11 debating in hundreds

of email messages and on JREF and SkepticForum.org

Host: Dr. Kevin Barrett, No Lies Radio

http://NoLiesRadio.org/archives/87037 RESULT: Frank refused to show up or answer his phone

at the time of the debate even after a 2 hour extension was given.

Later he claimed the topic was "not worthy of consideration",

not even for .911 to the charity of his choice. With the hour that Dr. Barrett had reserved on his show

Rick discussed 9/11, digital currency, and meditation.

http://truthjihadradio.blogspot.com

http://NoLiesRadio.org/archives/87037 Hear them debate Friday night 7:00 pm Eastern Time

August 15, 2014 and YOU vote for the winner





Vote for the Winner of .911 Bitcoin

http://www.easypolls.net

Dr. Barrett's $2000 Debate Challenge

Kevin Barrett's Debate Challenge



Debate911.blogspot.com Offering a $1000 $2000 honorarium to any qualified University of Wisconsin teacher (professor, lecturer, or teaching assistant) who defends the 9/11 Commission Report in a debate with blacklisted instructor Dr. Kevin Barrett. To respond: kbarrett(at)merr(dot)com University of Wisconsin



Home of the Badgers

9/11 Chemistry Debate

Shambrook - Harritt

9/11: What Really Happened?

April 1, 2014 19:00-21:00

University of Kent, UK

Dr. Niels Harrit vs. Edward Shambrook

9/11 Physics Debate I

Rev. Chris Mohr

235 points about the World Trade Center

Richard Gage, AIA

Founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth

Kaplan - Barrett Debate on Press TV



Lee Kaplan, investigative journalist from Berkley

Dr. Kevin Barrett, an American author and political expert in Madison, Wisconsin

Mackey - Szamboti Engineers Debate

on Ronald Wieck's HardFire Show



This debate between Ryan Mackey and Tony Szamboti

was monitored by official story supporter Ronald Wieck on his Hardfire show.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n1u3KO9kUdE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Guz04iFYxXY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kDvDND9zNUk Richard Gage, AIA, San Francisco Bay area architect and founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth debates Mark Roberts. July 22, 2008. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AlYVUUTeZp0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45Imd5i7IGo

Mark Roberts

on Ronald Wieck's HardFire Show

Fly Over vs. Fly Into Pentagon Debate

Points of Agreement and Disagreement (12-Jul-2012)

Fly Over Craig Ranke

Citizen Investigation Team (CIT)

Los Angeles, California Fly Into Rick Shaddock

Association for Nine Eleven Truth Awareness (ANETA)

Washington, DC The official Bush Story of 9/11 (BS911) is a lie.

Plane flew North of the Citgo gas station

Explosives were planted inside during remodeling.

The downed light poles were staged. The official Bush Story of 9/11 (BS911) is a lie.

Plane flew North of the Citgo gas station

Explosives were planted inside during remodeling.

The downed light poles were staged. Craig proposes that the plane flew over the Pentagon.

Small hole in Pentagon means plane flew over the roof. Flight 77 taken over by Remote Control using Boeing's patented technology

Small hole in Pentagon could result from plane exploding just prior to impact. Craig and Aldo Marquis flew from California to the Pentagon area, at their own expense, to make interviews of many eye witnesses, and documented many important facts on CitizenInvestigationTeam.org. Two Pentagon Police officers witnessed the plane passing north of the Citgo gas station, contrary to the official story. Craig interviewed the cab driver whose window was allegedly hit by light poles near the Pentagon, and exposes the fraud. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnboQNTHTYM Part 1 (15 min) www.youtube.com/watch?v=chUECF3paEU Part 2 (15 min) www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sOYFVR3b5Y Full debate (2 hours)

Ken Doc's 15 Hard Facts $1000 Challenge



"I am offering the FIRST person $1000 if they can fully debunk this list of 9/11 Facts!"

911Debate.org

Respectful debate leads both sides to truth



9/11 Commission - the biggest lie in American history

Disagreement Hierarchy



from Dr. Paul Graham (PhD, Computer Science, Harvard)

PaulGraham.com/disagree.html



Debating Tips

Logical Fallacies to be aware of and avoid

by Dr. Carl Sagan

Ben Shapiro's 7 techniques to win a debate

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JY5t6iUzajk



How Dr. Jordan Peterson wins an argument

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fS5nmy1v34c



Sponsored by the Association for Nine Eleven Truth Awareness

1629 K Street NW, Suite 319, Washington, DC 20006