Re: Elizabeth Warren/HRC Meeting

They have to believe it came from us. Reads too perfectly for HRC. If we intended to do it it probably wouldn't read so perfectly. Sounds good. And the NYT piece is fine -- for both sides. Mandy Grunwald Grunwald Communications 202-973-9400 gruncom@aol.com<mailto:gruncom@aol.com> ----- Just talked w Mindy. Good convo. She said she's been getting really good feedback about Dan's outreach--she said she knows we are talking to the people they suggested and they really like Dan. So good work, Schwerin! We should think about going back to them when we've isolated one or two ideas and getting more input on those (without showing our cards, obviously)...will probably be in our interest for them to have a sense of where we're headed before HRC delivers to the public. Also, she flagged that they're going to push back hard against POTUS on trade. She understood that HRC was already on the record as his SOS so we don't have a ton of room to maneuver. On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Huma Abedin <huma@hrcoffice.com<mailto:huma@hrcoffice.com>> wrote: Per Mindy, they received the same call simultaneously but are not returning it. Sounds like they plan to ignore but I asked her to confirm that. Huma emailed Mindy this am and I left her a msg. I told Mindy in my msg I heard it had leaked and wanted to discuss how we want to handle and touch base generally. On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Mandy Grunwald <gruncom@aol.com<mailto:gruncom@aol.com>> wrote: Have you reached out to Elizabeth's people? Do you need any help doing that? What do you plan to say? Mandy Grunwald Grunwald Communications 202 973-9400<tel:202%20973-9400> > On Feb 17, 2015, at 10:21 AM, Nick Merrill <nmerrill@hrcoffice.com<mailto:nmerrill@hrcoffice.com>> wrote: > > Hi All, > > The NYT (Jonathan Martin and Maggie Haberman) reached out this morning to tell us that they are aware of a meeting HRC had with Senator Warren at her house back in December. They plan to write imminently, so wanted everyone to be aware that this could pop soon. > > Nick