piotr_n



Offline



Activity: 2040

Merit: 1062





aka tonikt







LegendaryActivity: 2040Merit: 1062aka tonikt Re: Proposal: We should vote on the blocksize limit with proof-of-stake voting June 29, 2013, 05:52:54 PM #41 Quote from: retep on June 29, 2013, 05:32:00 PM Ah, that's who you are. Yeah /ignore

That's exactly what I am talking about.



A guy who fixed a bug in the official bitcoin client, by adding one line of code: a hero who saved the network from an extremely dangerous DoS attack.



A guy who dared to suggest that we should extend the net protocol to be able to prevent similar attacks in a future: a troll /ignore



You guys are just pathetic. That's exactly what I am talking about.A guy who fixed a bug in the official bitcoin client, by adding one line of code: a hero who saved the network from an extremely dangerous DoS attack.A guy who dared to suggest that we should extend the net protocol to be able to prevent similar attacks in a future: a troll /ignoreYou guys are just pathetic. Check out gocoin - my original project of full bitcoin node & cold wallet written in Go.

PGP fingerprint: AB9E A551 E262 A87A 13BB 9059 1BE7 B545 CDF3 FD0E PGP fingerprint: AB9E A551 E262 A87A 13BB 9059 1BE7 B545 CDF3 FD0E

AWARD-WINNING

CASINO CRYPTO EXCLUSIVE

CLUBHOUSE 1500+

GAMES 2 MIN

CASH-OUTS 24/7

SUPPORT 100s OF

FREE SPINS PLAY NOW tised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here. Advertised sites are not endorseby the Bitcoin Forum.They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in yourjurisdiction.

jdillon



Offline



Activity: 70

Merit: 10







MemberActivity: 70Merit: 10 Re: Proposal: We should vote on the blocksize limit with proof-of-stake voting June 29, 2013, 06:06:56 PM

Last edit: June 29, 2013, 06:18:57 PM by jdillon #42



Remind me to use the self-moderated threads option more often.





EDIT: I'll also point out how this "one-line-change" DoS attack was something that at least one of the Bitcoin developers knew about but didn't even realize it was an issue:



Heck, here's a Bitcoin for your efforts. Thank you!





-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----

Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)



hQEMA8xUMVQPvvGFAQf/frPPA2CHPDlMz9R28K05T3/wVmGhQ54v803OH8+SImg+

RQ8dGqh5H8Tgar8cuKE8jhikr5bg6NBf369F4h1L4Ir1lnplY2wDJj4tRr97Ea8b

4ADm91Fr0CWT03pa9XIp4LsgIC1oc3l2PUXxCQ/icVUnZk0jhSyp4ZnR0MYsRGqi

GuoVGHP765Xai7I56nLIO4E6LFqnvj5zIGgKYjc4o9ujmOs73gph5eGWEdna3rOG

GKkHrajshLviRgKGa99uG2RxtFltE8BcFkW1D7xweV8TLLH6jAGhIG2XrPol+bLc

RoQQZr3zR1w0ORdXL6GkIerxw4MNBI5hKRm4w93WRIUBDAO4Pc5vOCVNqAEIALeU

FJZZ8BUtgiQ4mMIUrEFXOD5h1BqqIsavUosOR3mVJNWtlnHuasYGn2LvFqJw1SzC

7uB1bGk7xyVNAOGECFDu6r5T9Diur6pr+CSxbRjh19dqNi+noKiD3V1z6yk6USf/

rqlfm13k7Tat6T4b1Kp/4JC8ofarL3ogyCzF3MXFbdnCBuqndklqDakb66iQv4SE

BI7rwWwwtaeI83uUBTQpJkH0wL1boHfjKtpuh4jOETOQ8zKJxWOFm4BJl6TzHmYf

/hnm5Wc7JIsV1GMqQYwNreJ+6RRBpPV5mayomzF9n01yOwV/rKY7bDBAS0LU5LEV

DcSuqJ6FRbihiFibS0HSwN8BhY0LpbmFCGH9NrHYHQW7WQ8tZVbMGvVSEoOwUdEZ

JUV7Uj3nLIGnmZ9vfePcu7zxCwUbrMk3eX1huaBbeCwdv/zkHQtzMTTySOAhbgxx

LcCZuUTUXDdO8oFCJD/3PUlBJgxniVkSGcsbMUo2ev+Lr541iWGmd+J6FlZvgwsz

bE0PkOtIyttYvMBHfqUJ9DN7xLLKu/gJnzcs0UrLauXrbFvV3NsBL6LcuZ62zp4n

Sj+iy+9LOnr2tOjv7uVyujut4moCHteFcD7VIBjr0Lxuzxf/scdPSe73Y9Rgs4yX

n8e+RjgOV6k4hjMKeyQRSutHuUHKY0OTtdEW7dbfnUpFR+n8dDqnS0uueMrCNakM

b0xxdHEZSticRzuv7mY8FVJ2AIMFaIlrGInorYbUBtqiAnkcfCD+LI0Vqz7fX8RP

8s7EK584hzzKvFgIYUQ5h4sNgo19ryvnNoeEJh73z3Bho5e6+nVdyW0M8U8hreio

xFHANgf+s46k2vmj9cVl1sH8tW5NOxTfQa+POmRAnIunLCfR9IDJUWCfiJBeYXJI

=6qYH

-----END PGP MESSAGE-----

I need to get better at not touching that "show/hide" option... But on IRC yesterday most of the developers put piotr_n on ignore for being an idiot who wouldn't listen to people showing why his idea was stupid and wasting everyones' time instead: http://bitcoinstats.com/irc/bitcoin-dev/logs/2013/06/28#l7875194 gmaxwell has the patience of a saint. (or a C++ developer on a slow machine)Remind me to use the self-moderated threads option more often.EDIT: I'll also point out how this "one-line-change" DoS attack was something that at least one of the Bitcoin developers knew about but didn't even realize it was an issue: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=31074593 Hopefully the other developers were just keeping their mouth shut and immediately understood how serious that issue was, but obviously it took a bit of insight on Peter's part to realize that the problem existed.Heck, here's a Bitcoin for your efforts. Thank you!

piotr_n



Offline



Activity: 2040

Merit: 1062





aka tonikt







LegendaryActivity: 2040Merit: 1062aka tonikt Re: Proposal: We should vote on the blocksize limit with proof-of-stake voting June 29, 2013, 06:12:15 PM #43

But it's not the first time I saw him talking bullshit, so I'm used to this.



@jdillon, you want to use self-moderated threads so nobody could tell you again that your idea is stupid?

way to go, man - that's how smart people solve problems Yeah, gmaxwell's comments yesterday were extremely helpful.But it's not the first time I saw him talking bullshit, so I'm used to this.@jdillon, you want to use self-moderated threads so nobody could tell you again that your idea is stupid?way to go, man - that's how smart people solve problems Check out gocoin - my original project of full bitcoin node & cold wallet written in Go.

PGP fingerprint: AB9E A551 E262 A87A 13BB 9059 1BE7 B545 CDF3 FD0E PGP fingerprint: AB9E A551 E262 A87A 13BB 9059 1BE7 B545 CDF3 FD0E