Those clamoring for College Football Playoff expansion and changes to the selection process will have to keep waiting.

CFB Playoff executive director Bill Hancock says the current model is progressing how the powers that be had hoped and there's no plans for additional teams being added to college football's championship postseason system in the near future.

“People know how the committee functions and they like the fact that we have 13 experts in the room,” Hancock said, via USA Today at this week's annual meeting. “They are very happy with the way things are going. I can’t say it any more plainer. It’s been a good four years.”

A "good four years" translates to increased TV revenues, substantially more exposure for the sport and the idea of an actual champion being crowned on the field through a four-team tournament vs. the older Bowl Championship Series computer model dictating the two teams that play for it all.

According to Forbes, the Big Ten drew a nation-leading $89.5 million in payout from the Playoff, to be distributed evenly among league schools.

Last season's final four featured the most controversy since the Playoff's inception when final rankings revealed Alabama getting in as the No. 4 seed over Big Ten champion Ohio State. It challenged the selection committee's original guidelines, stating teams are selected with “an emphasis on winning conference championships, strength of schedule and head-to-head competition when comparing teams with similar records and pedigree.”

Ohio State benefitted in similar Alabama fashion in 2016 after Penn State won the Big Ten, but was not invited to the Playoff. At least the committee is staying consistent with the way it views teams based on body of work.

"We want to know what they were thinking and why they think it,” Big 12 Commissioner Bob Bowlsby said, via USA Today. “We have to be willing to say, ‘OK, 13 honest people go into a room and make the right decisions. Some of those right decisions are made by individual vantage points. We always talk about that process, but we think we got it right the first time.”

Bowlsby said it was clear last season the CFB Playoff selection committee favored Alabama over Ohio State on paper and used subjective reasoning, which falls under the Playoff protocol's "four best teams" mantra.

“I think this year there was a belief Alabama was just a better football team than (Big Ten champion) Ohio State,” he said. “It’s always going to be based on the full body of work. They need to be pretty sure they’re right. But in the case of Alabama, they won the national championship so it’s hard to say they weren’t one of the four best teams.”

Big Ten commissioner Jim Delaney was absent from the annual meeting, reportedly on "vacation" prior to the start of his busy summer schedule.