

The author is clearly correct that any database which is online - and readily available - does risk hacking. How to manage data offline becomes the necessity for anyone that is vulnerable. While accepting that refugees may have particular concerns regarding their privacy, it is perhaps better to look at all aid and support as a category of priority for ensuring the quick flow of funds. If a privacy-based solution is to be applied, it is better if it is of sufficient scale to assist all displaced persons.

Iris recognition is a major step to 100% proof of a particular individual; how the control of payments and entitlements are managed is the critical factor.

Ideally we would see joint work by the UN and other aid agencies to not only preserve the identity of recipients but also better manage the flow of such funds to them.

To this end, centralizing support payments through clearing houses in the sending countries, prior to conversion into the recipient countries' currencies and networks, can lower costs and better manage the risk of hacking.

Privacy is important; so is lowering the risk of cheating by recipients - there is a need to work together to protect both facets.