If I asked you to bring me a single feathered egg of a unicorn, and I offered to buy it at any price you name, you couldn’t do it. You also likely would consider me mad—and with reason.

If I asked you to bring me a single page of written notes from the illegal wiretapping of Watergate telephone conversations, and I offered to buy it at any price you name, you couldn’t do that, either.

That’s because the wiretapping notes, or “logs,” that you were told about—over and over and over and over, by CIA mouthpieces at The Washington Post, at the New York Times, in federal courts, in movies, in books, in TV shows, and in Congressional hearings—do not exist now, and never existed at all. The claims of their existence are malicious myths. They have no more substance in reality than sea serpents, gorgons, flying horses, the Easter bunny, or yetis. (Or unicorn eggs, feathered or unfeathered, for that matter.) The claims of their existence are nefarious fiction.

And fiction doesn’t leave a paper trail.

Do you believe such Watergate “logs” exist? Do you believe they ever existed? If so, there are only two possibilities:

ONE, you have been lied to by expert liars who you placed (misplaced) trust in, in which case the lies hid the truth from you and clouded your judgment,

OR,

TWO, you’re every bit as mad as someone who believes there are feathered unicorn eggs.

If you fall into category ONE above, I’m going to tell you who lied to you, how they got away with it, and how you can help to prevent the same thing happening again, for yourself and others.

If you fall into category TWO above, I won’t be able to help you.

There is no shame in having been lied to by expert professional liars and falling for it. There is no stain or stigma attached—as long as you have the integrity and good sense find out that you were lied to, and that you fell for it. The problem we all face in current sensational headlines about Spygate and Russiagate is that we are being lied to right now, today, in very much the same way as we were lied to in Watergate—and by the very same institutions that lied to us before.

That’s why it is of utmost, even urgent, importance to find out what Sally Harmony saw.

WHAT SALLY HARMONY SAW1

Sally Harmony was G. Gordon Liddy’s secretary when on 5 June 1972 Liddy had her type “logs” of telephone conversations that Liddy provided to her. The crisp and efficient typing of Sally Harmony not only resulted in the resignation of a President of the United States, it also paved the way for the creation of the CIA’s top-secret Remote Viewing program at Stanford Research Institute (SRI) less than four months after her lithe and nimble fingers typed the last period on Liddy’s logs.

Why? Because as it turned out, these were no ordinary phone logs that the accommodating Sally Harmony typed up for George Gordon Battle Liddy. To hear Liddy tell it, he had been the mastermind of a hyper-clandestine “first break-in” at the Watergate on 28 May 1972, with the purpose of having CIA’s James McCord plant an illegal electronic “bug” on the phone of Lawrence O’Brien, chairman of the Democratic National Committee (DNC).

So, naturally, Liddy had his own secretary type up the phone logs from this super-secret, illegal operation of his. Wouldn’t you?

But Liddy went one better: he not only had Sally Harmony type these allegedly illicit logs, he instructed her to type them on special stationery Liddy also provided for the purpose, stationery that had emblazoned across the top, in color, a mysterious name he had dreamed up: GEMSTONE.

Of course the rational mind balks right there. Of course any self-respecting editor of even the cheapest, cheesiest, trashiest cloak-and-dagger fiction would laugh out loud at such a ludicrous premise before wadding it up and throwing it at somebody.

But in 1973 whole committees of United States Senators sat with furrowed brow for the cameras, listening to just such trumpery. So-called journalists took to wearing tennis shoes because they couldn’t get to phones fast enough to suit their editors in order to hold the presses for this lunacy. Special counsels for Congressional Committees frowned and pursed their lips and steepled their hands and asked deadly serious questions about this hogwash. Here the guileless Sally Harmony answers questions put to her by Special Counsels to the Watergate Committee, Sam Dash and Fred Thompson—at enormous taxpayer expense:

MR. DASH: Did you type these telephone logs on any particular

stationery?

SALLY HARMONY: Yes; Mr. Liddy had printed a stationery with

the name “Gemstone” across the top of it. . . .

MR. DASH: Did you have any directions as to how you were to

use this stationery? When were you to use the so-called

“Gemstone” stationery?

SALLY HARMONY: I used it for the telephone conversations that

I typed.

MR. DASH: For the telephone conversations?

SALLY HARMONY: Yes. . . . .

MR. THOMPSON: . . . [T]he printed Gemstone stationery, how many

times did you use that?

SALLY HARMONY: Perhaps two or three, Mr. Thompson; I cannot

be definite on that.

MR. THOMPSON: The printed Gemstone stationery was used only

on the illega—on the telephone bug results?

SALLY HARMONY: Yes, as I recall.

But from WHAT did Sally type these logs of alleged phone taps? WHAT had Liddy provided her to type from?

WHAT did Sally Harmony see?

It’s not an idle question, because ONLY Sally Harmony’s typed version of the logs, with GEMSTONE emblazoned across them, reportedly got distributed to and seen by others besides Liddy, and thereby ultimately brought down a President of the United States. ONLY Sally Harmony’s version of the logs made it possible for the CIA to enter into a top-secret contract with Hal Puthoff and Ingo Swann on 1 October 1972 to develop “remote viewing” for military intelligence purposes.

So WHAT did Sally see?

To answer that question, it’s necessary to pause in this story of skullduggery long enough to trace the provenance of these purported “logs.” After all, they did topple a President of the United States from office and sent many people to jail, so surely it would be worth allocating at least a few miserly paragraphs to a review of the claims for their very existence.

How did these history-making, history-changing, infamous records of allegedly bugged phone calls make their way from an illegal wiretap in DNC headquarters, through G. Gordon Liddy, to the neat and tidy desk of his prosaically obliging secretary at the Republican national campaign headquarters?

What did Sally Harmony see, and how did it come to her?

Immediately a confusion arises for anyone attempting to trace that crucial path because Liddy and two of his co-conspirators have alleged that there were TWO DIFFERENT VERSIONS of the phone logs, BOTH versions described as being TYPED:

1. Allegedly, there was an ORIGINAL version typed directly by

Liddy’s co-conspirator, Alfred Baldwin, while listening to

the output of the phone bug that supposedly had been planted

by their fellow co-conspirator, the CIA’s own James McCord.

These purportedly went from Baldwin via McCord to Liddy. This

alleged version of the logs will be referred to as the

BALDWIN VERSION of the logs.

2. There is the SECOND version, typed by Sally Harmony on

GEMSTONE stationery on orders from G. Gordon Liddy. This is

the ONLY version purportedly seen by people associated in

various ways with President Nixon. (There are too many

conflicting stories about who did or did not see them, but

that is neither here nor there for these purposes: whoever

saw logs or did not see logs, ONLY this SECOND version was

distributed.) This distributed version will be referred to as

the DISTRIBUTED HARMONY VERSION.

[NOTE: Read more about the CIA psyop of “twosies” here: “The CIA Psyops of Watergate and Beyond.” —Ed.]

Consider #1 above: the alleged original BALDWIN VERSION of typed logs. Did Sally Harmony see THAT version of the logs? Is that what Liddy gave her? Is THAT what Sally Harmony saw?

No, it is not. Sally Harmony never saw them.

The D.C. police investigating Watergate never saw them.

The FBI investigating Watergate never saw them.

The Congressional Watergate committees never saw them.

The press never saw them.

In fact, only three people in the world—all of them admitted co-conspirators—have ever claimed to have seen the alleged original BALDWIN VERSION logs. Not surprisingly, they are G. Gordon Liddy, the CIA’s James McCord, and Alfred Baldwin.

Here is what Liddy has claimed in sworn videotaped testimony that he was getting from McCord and Baldwin:

LIDDY: I wasn’t getting any tapes, nor was I getting

transcriptions of anything. I was getting logs. . . . And the

stuff was just of no use at all. It was stuff like

hairdressing appointments and somebody going to take a trip

somewhere, and personal stuff like that. . . . These logs were

so badly done, misspellings and all the rest of it, that I

felt compelled to edit them. And I did that through my

secretary, Ms. Harmony, and I tried to clean them up a little

bit and leave out the worst of it, try to include the best of

it, which wasn’t very much.

G. Gordon Liddy

in sworn testimony 6 December 1996

Well, Liddy should know—he’s the one who claims to have been receiving the original BALDWIN VERSION logs from Alfred Baldwin, via James McCord. And Liddy, with his background in law enforcement, certainly understands the difference between a “log” of calls and a verbatim “transcription” of actual conversations.

Now here’s what James McCord said in sworn testimony about these alleged original BALDWIN VERSION logs. McCord is being questioned under oath by Sam Dash, Chief Counsel to the Senate Watergate Committee (emphasis in ALL CAPS):

MR. DASH: Could you briefly describe . . . what actually would be

entered on the log which Mr. Baldwin would first type?

MCCORD: It would be similar to any other telephone

conversation that one person might make to another, beginning

with a statement on his log of the time of the call, who was

calling who, A SUMMARY OF WHAT WAS SAID during the

conversation itself, including names of persons who were

mentioned . . . .

Well, that seems more or less consistent with what Liddy claims to have been receiving, except McCord adds that there was a “summary” of each phone call as well.

Unfortunately, what Liddy and McCord claim Alfred Baldwin was producing isn’t what Alfred Baldwin himself said in his own sworn testimony before the Senate Watergate Committee:

SENATOR ERVIN: The information you got while you were at the

Howard Johnson [across] from the Democratic headquarters,

what form was it in when you gave it to Mr. McCord?

BALDWIN: The initial day, the first day that I recorded the

conversations was on a yellow sheet. On Memorial Day [Monday,

29 May 1972] . . . when he [McCord] returned to the room he

brought an electric typewriter. He instructed me in the upper

left-hand corner to print—or by typewriter . . . the date, the

page, and then proceed down into the body and in

chronological order put the time and then the contents of the

conversation . . . .

SENATOR ERVIN: And you typed a summary of the conversations

you overheard?

BALDWIN: Well, they weren’t exactly a summary. I would say

almost verbatim, Senator.

SENATOR ERVIN: Almost verbatim.

Yes, that’s what Baldwin said: “almost verbatim.” And he should know. After all, he’s the one—and the only one, according to their stories—who purportedly sat ’round the clock for two weeks in early June with headphones on, listening to the output of a bug that McCord allegedly had planted in the DNC, and typing his fingers to the bone. He’s the one who had to do all the typing of the alleged original BALDWIN VERSION of phone logs.

Alfred Baldwin must have been some special kind of typist. Even court reporters would be in awe. Certainly Sally Harmony would have been impressed. So would anyone who has ever tried to type an “almost verbatim” record of a conversation in progress.

And to think: he spent all that time typing “almost verbatim” transcripts of conversations about hair appointments, trips somebody was taking, “and personal stuff like that.”

So who’s lying about the logs? Liddy? McCord? Baldwin?

Of course they all are lying. Of course the reason that neither Sally Harmony nor anyone else in the world ever saw any such “logs” or “summaries” or “almost verbatim” transcriptions is because they never existed at all. There were no BALDWIN VERSION logs, ever. It is a lie, start to finish. There were no such logs because there were no bugs planted in the Watergate during any “first break-in” on 28 May 1972. That’s because there was no “first break-in” at all. It is a lie told by the same liars lying about the logs.

THEN WHAT DID SALLY HARMONY SEE?

To finally learn the truth about what Sally Harmony saw, we must venture once more into the labyrinthine mind of G. Gordon Liddy himself. Only Liddy can tell it; it is, after all, his tale.

Liddy claims that it happened this way, beginning on Wednesday, 31 May 1972, when he says he met with the CIA’s James McCord and Alfred Baldwin in the dark and secret “observation post”—Room 723 of the Howard Johnson’s across from the Watergate—where, according to Liddy’s fabulous fiction, Alfred Baldwin was busy making the original logs (emphasis in ALL CAPS):

“McCord gave me some typed logs of the interceptions to date.

. . . When I got home I looked over the logs. [Alfred Baldwin] was no typist. The logs revealed that the interception was

from a telephone . . . and that the telephone tapped was being

used by a number of different people, none of who appeared to

be Larry O’Brien. I decided I . . . had to wait until I had more

product of better quality from McCord. . . . I expected the

product to improve. No such luck. The next day’s take was the

same. . . . On Monday, 5 June, I DICTATED from the typed logs TO

SALLY HARMONY . . . EDITING AS I WENT ALONG.”

G. Gordon Liddy, “autobiography” WILL

And now we finally know the answer: Sally Harmony never saw anything at all.

She listened. Sally Harmony rolled a page of GEMSTONE stationery that G. Gordon Liddy had provided into her electric typewriter, she slipped on the earpieces of her dictation machine at her neat little desk, she pressed the pedal, and she listened to the voice of G. Gordon Liddy DICTATING the “logs” she was to type that gave Liddy, McCord, Hunt, and Baldwin the alibi they needed to cover up where they had REALLY been on 26, 27, and 28 May 1972.

The “logs” came from Liddy’s lying lips.

There were no actual “logs” from the Watergate.

There were no “bugs” planted in the Watergate.

There was no “first break-in” at Democratic National Committee headquarters at the Watergate on 28 May 1972 as claimed by Liddy, Hunt, McCord, Baldwin and their CIA-trained pack of Cuban liars, nor were there any failed “attempts” on 26 and 27 May 1972, as they also claimed. It all is, and always has been, a massive lie. And it is the REAL cover-up.

There is not now, and never has been, a single scrap of evidence to corroborate their stories of the alleged “first break-in” and prior “failed attempts.” Even the HARMONY DISTRIBUTED VERSION of these alleged “logs” didn’t survive to be seen by a single investigator of Watergate. All copies were destroyed first.

The co-conspirators only “corroborated” each other.

The reason they corroborated each other, lied for each other, went to jail for penny-ante crimes, and defrauded the entire world is because they were providing themselves with alibis for those fateful last days of May 1972 in order to cover up their REAL crimes committed then—crimes far more vicious, far more heinous, far more odious, shocking, and abhorrent than anything ever uncovered in all the endless annals of Watergate.

They were working directly for DCI [Director of Central Intelligence] Richard Helms.

The mission that they really carried out between 25 May 1972 and 29 May 1972 had been being planned for years and had been set in motion a year earlier by Daniel Ellsberg, who had been guaranteed that he would never be convicted on the “Pentagon Papers” before those strategically worthless “secret” papers ever saw ink.

That’s what opened the door for Hunt and Liddy to be slid over into the White House in July 1971. They had to be well established as being connected to the White House to carry out their ACTUAL assignments during the last week of May 1972. There was an important reason for them to have White House credentials. Part of that reason lies at the 89th Airlift Wing.

Hunt and Liddy also used the exact same team of CIA-trained Cuban liars on the phony “break-in” of the office Ellsberg psychiatrist Lewis Fielding in September 1971 as they used for the phony Watergate “first break-in.” The Fielding op also was an alibi for Liddy and Hunt while they were doing other dirty work for Helms and the CIA in preparation for what was to come in 1972. It also gave them an “excuse” for traveling to New York City on 4 September 1971, where they registered at the Pierre Hotel—just a brisk walk from the Times Square lab of CIA’s Cleve Backster.

Hunt was “the principal” for all of it—the principal hand-puppet of DCI Richard Helms.

Every DCI since Richard Helms has known exactly what was actually done during the last days of May 1972 by Liddy, Hunt, McCord and others, and so has been an accessory after the fact. They all have shared and kept the guilty secret because for over thirty years it has been the Number One filthy “national security” secret that has had to be protected at all cost. . . .

The “Watergate” scandal is still a festering, gangrenous national and international wound that will not heal. It cannot heal, ever, until that wound is reopened and every last septic secret that lies buried in it is dug out and exposed to the disinfectant light of public scrutiny.

Then you will know why on Sunday, 1 October 1972—exactly two weeks and one day after a federal grand jury indicted Liddy, Hunt, McCord and their pack of CIA-trained Cuban liars—CIA Office of Technical Service entered into the classified Contract 8473 with Hal Puthoff, Ingo Swann, and Russell Targ. And it was all because of what Sally Harmony saw.

The text of the above section is adapted from my book Watergate: The Hoax, specifically Chapter 5, “What Sally Harmony Saw,” and “Appendix I: The Usenet Posts of The Real Deep Throat.” With humble thanks to The Real Deep Throat—and, no, I don’t mean the desiccated wraith Mark Felt.

The surreal landscape of Watergate—and of Spygate, and of Russiagate, and of Dossiergate, and of FISAgate—is crawling with no-see-ums. It is dense with no-see-ums. It is practically a landfill of no-see-ums. The creation of these vicious and virulent vacuums and visions is art, not accident. Such nonexistent “things” and “events” are the stock-in-trade of the so-called “intelligence community.” The Deep State invests untold billions in creating these manufactured hallucinations and pawning them off, through their controlled “media,” on a gullible and unquestioning world.

The High Priests and handmaidens of these malicious myths, these festering fictions, delight in watching the world press and public babble and chatter like children over their hoaxes and frauds. Their greatest delight, though, comes from knowing that the suckers and useful idiots who are duped by their lies pay through the nose, in the form of taxes, for the privilege of being made fools.

If you doubt it for a moment, we’re not done yet with these infamous Watergate “logs”—that never had any more valid substantive existence than a feathered unicorn egg, but that millions of dollars have been spent on, discussing, dissecting, teaching, prosecuting, and investigating. These utterly fraudulent and nonexistent “logs” destroyed untold lives, but far more importantly, they destroyed a President of the United States, and far more importantly than that, they forever damaged the INTEGRITY OF THE OFFICE of the President of the United States.

Yet they were a HOAX. They were a MYTH. They were a LIE, manufactured with malice aforethought by the Central Intelligence Agency—the single largest criminal organization in the history of mankind—and its equally criminal FBI and Five Eyes accomplices.

Do you still doubt it? Read now: Myths and Madness: The No-See-Ums of Spygate, Russiagate, and Watergate, Part 2

Ashton Gray

Fiction doesn’t leave a paper trail.

Ashton Gray’s revolutionary 600-page CIA exposé Watergate: The Hoax prophetically foretold everything that is exploding across the headlines today about “Spygate” and the Russia hoax. It contains hundreds of cited references to government and personal documents, many of which have never been published before. It finally exposes the dirty truth behind Watergate that has confounded and dumfounded every investigation, book, report, and trier of fact that has gone before—and it is even dirtier than anyone ever guessed. The exact same kinds of tactics and methods are being used by the CIA and FBI, right now, today—still using their same Operation Mockingbird mouthpieces in “mainstream media” to package and sell their lies. Buy and read Watergate: The Hoax today, and recommend it to everyone you know, love, and care about!

Watergate: The Hoax is available now

at Amazon, iBooks and Barnes & Noble.

Order it today!

Rewrite history with the truth!

And be among the first to buy and own Ashton Gray’s revolutionary work Created Equal: The Greatest Lie, a merciless assault on 300 years of fatuously false philosophy, psychology, sociology, and politics! Order now for only $4.99 at Amazon.com.

Available as Kindle and trade paperback; also available at other fine book retailers.

Join the new cultural revolution! Buy and read Created Equal: The Greatest Lie!