Is this an undocumented change? Can you only get 50% warscore by fully sieging your enemy and then have to wait for it to tick up?I tried to imprison a plotting count but failed. It was only a single county count so I fully sieged his holding... but I only received 50% warscore:He was still willing to surrender though. Is this a change to prevent large empires losing wars to large invasions/decadence revolts before they have a chance to even raise their levies?Speaking of which, is the decadence mechanic on the list of things to have a look at? I had to ditch a recent muslim game because my dynasty became too big and decadence just piled in faster then I could remove it. So I had to just convert myself to another religion. The whole 'straigthen up' seems a bit broken still (they seem to have already been asked and relapsed into decadence or something) and sometimes I'm simply given no option but to incur tyranny via imprisonment... once I have 50-70 tyranny I have to assassinate via diplomacy (since noone ever wants to help me kill them via plots) and am in danger of incurring '-60 broke feudal obligations'. It's quite the fun killer late game in big empires... you have to unrealistically cull your family/dynasty.EDIT: Also, seems like only Dukes and below are fond of going on pilgrimages... yet to see a King with the trait.