By Debra Saunders - May 31, 2012

On Tuesday, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi explained to the Commonwealth Club the reason Washington passed Obamacare. Even if everyone in America "loved" his own health care plan, Pelosi argued, Congress had to pass President Barack Obama's Affordable Care Act because American health care was "unsustainable financially."

Yes, Pelosi actually believes Washington had to get involved in health care to reduce its cost.

The Democratic leader then listed some of Obamacare's new benefits: "free" annual checkups and preventive care and the ability of adult children to stay on their parents' policies until age 26.

Josh Archambault, director of health care policy for the Boston-based Pioneer Institute, expressed the frustration felt by health policy wonks who know the new benefits "are not free." The cost of physicals and services doesn't go away.

"It's OK to decide that we should offer something as a preventive service, but we must understand the trade-off of cost," Archambault noted. "We all pay more as a result."

Obama also has made the dubious claim that preventive care "saves money for families, for businesses, for government, for everybody." Problem: It's not true. Congressional Budget Office Director Doug Elmendorf warned in 2009, "Although different types of preventive care have different effects on spending, the evidence suggests that for most preventive services, expanded utilization leads to higher, not lower, medical spending overall." Elmendorf cited a 2008 New England Journal of Medicine article that reported that less than 20 percent of preventive services save money, whereas the rest drive up costs.

Pelosi also told the Commonwealth Club that the Affordable Care Act would mean as much for Americans' economic security as Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. Her analogy brought to mind PolitiFact's award of its 2010 "Lie of the Year" to the Republican assertion that Obamacare represented "a government takeover of health care."

PolitiFact based its conclusion on the grounds that, under Obamacare, most consumers continue to receive their health care through private carriers and that the new health care law "relies largely on the free market." Yet here was Pelosi putting Obamacare on the pedestal she reserves for Washington's three giant government programs.

There is a difference. The federal government taxes people and pays for those programs. Obamacare, on the other hand, mandates benefits and then passes the costs on to employers. "Government is not operating the mechanisms in the market," Archambault noted, "but they are setting the rules of the game."

Be afraid. Under Obamacare, Congress can take credit for providing consumers with more health care while forcing employers to pay for it. Pelosi, the once and would-be-future speaker, actually believes those benefits are free and will cut costs.