WASHINGTON ― President Donald Trump’s White House had its answer to Monday’s Congressional Budget Office analysis of the Republican health care proposal even before it was released: Don’t believe it.

The CBO released its official “score” of the bill designed to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, finding that the bill would result in 24 million more uninsured Americans by 2026.

That would nearly double the uninsured population in the country from the current 28 million to 52 million in nine years.

Neither Trump nor his White House had responded to that estimate by early Monday evening, although Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price said in a late afternoon news conference that the CBO analysis was flawed.

“We think that CBO simply has it wrong,” he said.

But the White House had already started discrediting the independent office, starting when informal discussions between the CBO’s nonpartisan analysts and Republican House leaders began offering hints of what the formal analysis would show.

Kevin Lamarque/Reuters President Donald Trump holds up a card made by a child and given to him by an attendee of a health care meeting at the White House on March 13.

Over the weekend, Trump’s budget director, Mick Mulvaney, told ABC News that health care legislation estimates aren’t something the CBO does well.

“So, I love the folks at the CBO, they work really hard,” Mulvaney said. “Sometimes we ask them to do stuff they’re not capable of doing, and estimating the impact of a bill of this size probably isn’t the best use of their time.”

And on Monday, White House press secretary Sean Spicer continued criticism of the CBO’s competence that he began last week.

“The last time they did this, they were wildly off,” Spicer said, pointing out that the CBO eight years ago had estimated that millions more people would be enrolled under President Barack Obama’s signature health care law than wound up doing so.

“That’s not a question of our credibility. It’s a question of theirs,” Spicer said.

But Spicer did not mention that the original CBO analysis of Obamacare was based on assumptions that states would be eager to set up insurance exchanges and accept an expansion of Medicaid for their poorer residents, particularly since the federal government was paying for all of it.

However, Republicans opposed to that law and opposed to Obama personally blocked both of those efforts in a number of states, leading to far fewer people being enrolled through those programs.