









Group: Private Forum Pilot

Posts: 106

Joined: 5-October 10

From: Canada

Member No.: 5,337









QUOTE (9/11 Justice Now @ Aug 11 2012, 09:48 AM)

presentation that is named "Does not look like NTSB record--N612U_9_11.ppt" i have looked at this file before many months a go and i could not figure what the person

who created this filed was hawking on about but now i am absolutely positive i have figured it out.



Look at the pictures i have created and linked below it is rather self explanatory, it is plain and simply to see that the aircraft that hit the South Tower was not UAL 175

and it cannot have been UAL 175 as we where told because at least one of the letters shown in the picture doesnt not match any of the letters or numbers which are

UAL 175's tail number rather it appears as thought for some reason the letter B or the letter P appears to be part of Flight 175's tail number, also note how the top

of the character is shaped it does not match any of the numbers or letters contained in UAL 175's original tail number, hence and therefore this cannot be wreckage

from United Airlines Flight and it must come from an entirely different flight altogether.



So we have only one conclusion to draw the flight that hit the South Tower cannot have been UAL 175 and must have been a completely different flight altogether.



The top of the letter shown on the far right side of the photo should match the top of one of these numbers or letters 12UA but it does not match the tops of any of the letters or

numbers shown to be UAL 175's tail number and appears to be from an airliner with the letter B or P as part of its tail number.



So how can this wreckage be from UAL 175 when one of the characters do not match the tail number of Flight 175?







Hello everyone i found a strangely titled power point presentation in the torrent NTSB_FOIA_Appeal_2012_00001 in a folder named "WTC Photos" there is a power pointpresentation that is named "Does not look like NTSB record--N612U_9_11.ppt" i have looked at this file before many months a go and i could not figure what the personwho created this filed was hawking on about but now i am absolutely positive i have figured it out.Look at the pictures i have created and linked below it is rather self explanatory, it is plain and simply to see that the aircraft that hit the South Tower was not UAL 175and it cannot have been UAL 175 as we where told because at least one of the letters shown in the picture doesnt not match any of the letters or numbers which areUAL 175's tail number rather it appears as thought for some reason the letter B or the letter P appears to be part of Flight 175's tail number, also note how the topof the character is shapedit does not match any of the numbers or letters contained in UAL 175's original tail number, hence and therefore this cannot be wreckagefrom United Airlines Flight and it must come from an entirely different flight altogether.So we have only one conclusion to drawthe flight that hit the South Tower cannot have been UAL 175 and must have been a completely different flight altogether.The top of the letter shown on the far right side of the photo should match the top of one of these numbers or letters 12UA but it does not match the tops of any of the letters ornumbers shown to be UAL 175's tail number and appears to be from an airliner with the letter B or P as part of its tail number.So how can this wreckage be from UAL 175 when one of the characters do not match the tail number of Flight 175?





Hello - I went looking for thew power-point presentation you mentioned but I had no luck finding it. Not to mention the links you provided here are not working for me. Can you provide us with more details please? Hello - I went looking for thew power-point presentation you mentioned but I had no luck finding it. Not to mention the links you provided here are not working for me. Can you provide us with more details please?