The Democratic Primaries: No more exit polls, Kentucky and Oregon recap

Richard Charnin

May 19, 2016

Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts

Proving Election Fraud: Phantom Voters, Uncounted Votes and the National Poll

LINKS TO POSTS

Democratic Primaries spread sheet

The networks cancelled plans for exit polls for the remaining presidential primaries. Forget about the California and New Jersey primaries. Hell, they aren’t important.

11 of 26 exit polls exceeded the margin of error for Sanders

The probability is 1 in 76.8 billion = 1- binomdist (10,26,.025,true)

24 of 26 exit polls shifted to Clinton in the vote

The probability is 1 in 190,000 = 1- binomdist(23,26,0.5, true)

The average exit poll margin of error for the 26 primaries was 3.52%. The MoE includes a 30% exit poll cluster factor (0.81) which is added to the theoretical 2.71% MoE. View a statistical comparison of exit poll discrepancies between the stolen 2004 presidential election and the 2016 Democratic Primaries.

Cancelling the exit polls is nothing new. Just before the 2012 presidential election, the National Election Pool announced that 19 state exit polls would be cancelled. Obama was headed for another landslide, although the pre-election polls said it was a close race. Why did the networks cancel exit polls in 19 states?

Unadjusted state exit poll data are a major component in calculating exit poll discrepancies. Having data for just 31 states made it impossible to compare the total weighted average of the state polls to the official recorded share. The decision was a blow to Election Integrity.

In six presidential elections from 1988-2008, the Democrats won the average unadjusted state and national exit polls by a 52-42%. The recorded margin was just 48-46%.

THE FRAUDULENT KENTUCKY PRIMARY

CLINTON won by 2000 out of 413,000 votes: 46.8-46.3%

Lundergan Grimes, the chief Elections officer for the state of Kentucky, told voters that electing Hillary Clinton is more important than doing her job.

Card readers malfunctioned and votes were fully erased from Pike County, Kentucky. This gave Clinton the lead. At one point, all Pike County data represented all zeroes in the vote totals. Later, 20 percent of the total votes were missing and Clinton gained the lead.

WKYT reported that the AP had actually “erased all votes from Pike County”. The numbers pushed Clinton back up by over 4,000. The Pike County Clerk’s Office said that there was an issue with one of their card readers, and it ended up causing them to have a delay in posting their numbers.

Election fraud was reported in 31 counties. There were at least 76 calls to the hotline of the Office of the Kentucky Attorney General, Andy Beshear. According to Kentucky news station WSAZ, ‘Complaints included procedural and legal questions, voter assistance, [issues with] voting machines, voter identification, residency, election officials, electioneering, poll disruption and vote buying.’

CUMULATIVE VOTE SHARES- JEFFERSON COUNTY

As is virtually always the case, the establishment candidate (usually a Republican) gains cumulative precinct vote shares in the largest (usually Democratic) counties. It is counter-intuitive. Jefferson is the largest county in KY and Clinton is the establishment candidate. Her cumulative vote share increased by 7.4% (55.9% to 63.3%) after 85% of smaller precincts were counted! The probability P of this vote spike occurring by chance is essentially ZERO:

P =1 in 6.7 billion if we assume a 2% MoE in a poll of 90,000 respondents

P= 1.49E-10= normdist (0.559,0.633,0.02/1.96,false) .

OREGON

This was a closed primary. Sanders won the election by 56-44%. Sanders had 53% of the first tier of votes at the 60% mark. He had 56% at the 96% mark. Therefore he had 67% of the 36% late votes. The calculation is basic algebra: X = 67.2% = (0.56-0.53*0.6)/0.36.

In 2014, the voter registration mix was Dem 37.8-Rep 29.9- Ind 32.3. There is no question but that the percentage of Independents is higher today. Assuming Independents could have voted in the primary, Sanders would have won by approximately 65-35% which agrees with the 67% calculated above.

Registration Pct Adjusted Sanders Clinton Dem (recorded) 37.8% 53.9% 56.0% 44.0% Ind 32.3% 46.1% 75.0% 25.0% Adjusted share 70.1% 100.0% 64.8% 35.2%

Oregon has an excellent track record of fair elections. Here is the historical evidence.

DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY EXIT POLLS

Margin of error, Sanders 2-party Recorded Vote, Exit Poll, Exit Poll – Recorded vote, Probability

Primary MoE Vote Exit Poll Exit-Vote Prob of Fraud AL 3.9% 19.8% 25.9% 6.1% 99.9% AR 4.0% 31.0% 33.3% 2.3% 87.3% AZ (Yavapai Cty) 3.9% 40.9% 63.0% 22.1% 100.0% CT 3.6% 45.6% 47.2% 1.7% 81.3% FL 3.0% 34.1% 36.0% 2.0% 90.2% GA 3.4% 28.3% 33.8% 5.5% 99.9% IL 3.5% 49.1% 51.2% 2.0% 87.5% IN 3.5% 52.8% 55.4% 2.6% 92.9% MA 3.5% 49.3% 53.3% 4.0% 98.7% MD 4.1% 33.3% 33.4% 0.1% 52.7% MI 3.3% 50.8% 53.2% 2.4% 92.2% MO 4.4% 49.9% 51.9% 2.0% 81.0% MS 3.4% 16.6% 21.3% 4.7% 99.7% NC 3.0% 42.8% 43.7% 0.9% 72.3% NH 2.6% 61.4% 60.4% -1.0% 22.7% NY 3.5% 42.1% 48.0% 5.9% 100.0% OH 3.1% 43.1% 48.1% 5.0% 99.9% OK 4.5% 55.5% 50.9% -4.6% 2.1% PA 3.5% 43.6% 45.1% 1.5% 80.6% SC 3.1% 26.1% 31.3% 5.2% 100.0% TN 4.0% 32.9% 35.5% 2.6% 90.0% TX 3.5% 33.7% 37.9% 4.2% 99.1% VA 3.3% 35.4% 37.4% 2.0% 88.4% VT 2.3% 86.3% 86.5% 0.2% 55.5% WI 3.0% 56.7% 63.6% 6.9% 100.0% WV 4.7% 51.4% 57.4% 6.0% 99.4% Average 3.52% 42.8% 46.3% 3.6% 97.6%

Probability that at least n of 26 Exit Polls exceed the margin of error for Sanders

n P=1 in

1 2 2 7

3 38

4 266

5 2,415

6 27,384

7 378,644

8 6,280,036

9 123,437,142

10 2,850,178,375

11 76,829,636,415