In case you hadn’t noticed, San Francisco is crawling with “eligible” singles—but it’s remarkably hard to get an honest date, not to mention find true love.

But don’t take our word for it. You can thank two recent reports for those “duh department” conclusions.

According to Zillow’s “Valentine’s Day Index,” San Francisco ranked as the No. 1 metro for singles. The folks at Zillow looked for areas with a large proportion of singles (that would be 52.4 percent), a high average income (after rent) and a large number of possible date spots.

But as anyone worth their Tinder swipes can attest, finding love in the Bay isn’t a numbers game. According to a recent collaboration between Facebook and the Wall Street Journal, despite its high number of singles, San Francisco is the city in which you’re least likely to find love. You read that right.

The researchers studied the percentage of single Facebook users who went from “Single” to “In a Relationship” in October, and found that Colorado Springs residents, not San Franciscans, were most likely to be in a relationship.

And since there’s nothing we love more than a good study (except, perhaps, a free lunch), there’s this nugget of gold: For those lucky enough to find “the one,” settling down is really, really expensive. According to Locality.com’s Yuppie Price Index, the Bay Area was ranked the No. 1 most expensive city in the United States for young urban professionals. So, there’s that.

Good news if you’re looking for romance, though, according to Groupon. Apparently, our neighbor to the North, Napa, is one of the top cities for romance, due to its number of flower sales per Groupon subscriber and sales of bed and breakfast deals.

Related:

Searching for love in San Francisco

16 San Francisco spots for romance

Secret to a good marriage: All you need is love – and some genetic luck