Form Submission 1649 | #Hannity — Sean Hannity (@seanhannity) January 27, 2018

This Tweet temporarily disappeared.

Was it deleted by Hannity himself, or did Twitter remove it for him?

The most watched TV host in the U.S., @SeanHannity has his Twitter account (3.3 million followers) mysteriously disappear after tweeting "Submission Form 1649" https://t.co/jIw0Lq5K1m pic.twitter.com/Op3b2h24Zu — Julian Assange ⌛ (@JulianAssange) January 27, 2018

In any event, it’s back up now.

So what happened? Email ID: 1649, from the Hillary Clinton Email Archive.

In September 2010, Barack Obama undertook an ambitious effort to settle the ancient dispute between Israel and the Palestinian people. Direct talks took place in Washington, D.C., in early September, and follow-up discussions were planned for later in the month. As Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton called up Tony Blair and Lynn de Rothschild for support.

“Be sure he knows I’ve been trading calls w Lynn de Rothschild and hope to connect late tonight”

https://www.wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/1649

I was trying to reach you to tell you and Teddy that I asked Tony Blair to go to Israel as part of our full court press on keeping the Middle East negotiations going. He told me that he had a commitment in Aspen w you two and the conference, but after we talked, he decided to go and asked me to tell you. He is very sorry, obviously, but I’m grateful that he accepted my request. I hope you all understand and give him a raincheck. If you were interested, he might be able to satellite in if you have the technology available. He should land around Sam Aspen time. Let me know what penance I owe you. And pls explain to Teddy. As ever, H

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/1570

This is because, this entire time, Hillary Clinton wanted a Palestinian state:

I spoke today with Quartet Representative Blair to discuss developments in the Middle East. This Administration has, from the beginning, worked to bring about comprehensive peace in the Middle East, including a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. On that issue our approach has been three-fold: (1) to help build the economy and capacity to govern of a Palestinian state; (2) to renew political negotiations to enable the earliest possible establishment of that state; and (3) to achieve these in a manner that ensures the security of Israel and of the Palestinians. Consistent with Prime Minister Fayyad’s plan for a future Palestinian state, Tony Blair, as the Quartet representative, will intensify his partnership with Senator Mitchell in support of the political negotiations. In his role as Quartet Representative Tony Blair will continue, with full support by and coordination with Senator Mitchell, to mobilize the efforts of the international community: (1) to build support for the institutional capacity and governance of a future Palestinian State, including on the rule of law; (2) to improve freedom of movement and access for Palestinians; (3) to encourage further private sector investment; and (4) to bring change in the living conditions of the people in Gaza.

But was it in good faith?

While the liberal media would love to insinuate that “talks broke down when a moratorium on West Bank settlement construction expired and Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu sought to tie renewal of the moratorium to Palestinian recognition of Israel”, that’s not the case here.

In early September, a coalition of 13 Palestinian factions began a campaign of attacks against Israeli civilians, including a series of drive-by shootings and rocket attacks on Israeli towns, in an attempt to derail and torpedo the ongoing negotiations.

Why should Israel accept the ambassadorship of a man who faces war crimes accusations for the entrance in the 2003 Iraq war?

Especially when the supporters of the state partitioning idea, when they don’t get their way, decide to carry out terrorist attacks with impunity on a bi-monthly basis?

“Two-state solution” sounds better than “I don’t want you to have your own state”.

Keep in mind that four years later, after Egypt, Libya, Yemen, Kuwait, Pakistan, Indonesia, Malaysia, Sudan, India, and Iran were in the throes of political revolution, Huma sent the following email to Hillary:

I’m giving you credit for inspiring the “peaceful” protests.

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/16792

Sounds like Israel dodged a huge rocket by not giving into Palestinian “peace talk” demands.

In the end though, it wouldn’t have mattered – Donald got there first. But did he arrive soon enough?

And how does this relate to Hannity’s tweet? Isn’t it easier to assume it was a mismatch between a chron job, a website’s contact form, an SQL injection, and a hacker’s desire to impersonate Hannity’s account on Twitter?

“A wizard is never late, nor is he early, he arrives precisely when he means to”.

The words a wizard chooses are meant to matter. Assange’s reference of “Submission Form 1649” is different from Hannity’s actual tweet “Form Submission 1649”. Assange makes it sound like a website hack, Hannity makes it sound like a call to action. But whose action, and whose call?

The Turkish Cyber Army’s definitely been busy hacking conservative social media accounts: