AbuHumayd

New Member







Posts: 34

New Member Narration on Praying One Rak'ah Witr Quote Select Post

Select Post Deselect Post

Deselect Post Link to Post

Link to Post Member Give Gift

Member Back to Top Post by AbuHumayd on رضي الله عنه , where he said one rak'ah for witr wasn't sufficient, after Maulana Zeeshan gave a hand and pointed me in the right direction, I forwarded my question to Shaykh Abul Hasan. I'll post my question first, followed by the Shaykh's reply.



My question:

السلام عليكم



Shaykh, regarding a narration in al-Tabarani's al-Mu'jam al-Kabir from 'Abdullah Ibn Mas'ud رضي الله عنه :





"حدثنا علي بن عبد العزيز، ثنا أبو نعيم، ثنا القاسم بن معن، عن حصين، قال: بلغ ابن مسعود أن سعدا يوتر بركعة، قال: "ما أجزأت ركعة قط

al-Tabarani said: 'Ali ibn 'Abd al-'Aziz narrated to us, from Abu Na'im who narrated to us, from al-Qasim ibn Ma'n who narrated to us from Husain that he said: "It reached Ibn Mas'ud that Sa'd did witr with one Rak'ah ", (to which) Ibn Mas'ud said:

"I do not consider one Rak'ah as enough".





library.islamweb.net/newlibrary/display_book.php?bk_no=84&ID=2379&idfrom=9013&idto=9323&bookid=84&startno=267





al-Haythami narrated it in his Majma' al-Zawa'id and said the isnad is hasan but Husain did not meet Ibn Mas'ud:





رواه الطبراني في الكبير ، وحصين لم يدرك ابن مسعود وإسناده حسن .

library.islamweb.net/newlibrary/display_book.php?bk_no=87&ID=641&idfrom=3453&idto=3465&bookid=87&startno=8





However Imam Muhammad narrated it in his Muwatta and added Ibrahim al-Nakha'i in the chain:





(حديث موقوف) قَالَ مُحَمَّدٌ : أَخْبَرَنَا يَعْقُوبُ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ ، حَدَّثَنَا حُصَيْنُ عَنْ إِبْرَاهِيمَ ، عَنِ ابْنِ مَسْعُودٍ ، قَالَ : " مَا أَجْزَأَتْ رَكْعَةٌ وَاحِدَةٌ قَطُّ " .

library.islamweb.net/hadith/display_hbook.php?bk_no=21&pid=9859&hid=236





And in Nasb al-Rayah, al-Zayla'i narrated al-Tabarani's version connecting it through Ibrahim al-Nakha'i:





ورواه الطبراني في " معجمه " حدثنا علي بن عبد العزيز ثنا أبو نعيم ثنا القاسم بن معن ثنا حصين عن إبراهيم ، قال : بلغ ابن مسعود أن سعدا يوتر بركعة ، فقال : ما أجزأت ركعة قط . انتهى .

library.islamweb.net/newlibrary/display_book.php?flag=1&bk_no=9&ID=472





Could it be some nuskhahs of al-Mu'jam al-Kabir have Ibrahim al-Nakha'i in the sanad? Do you think you can check some nuskhahs of it and let me know please when you have the time?



Could it be a mistake by al-Zayla'i?



Jazak-Allah Khayran Shaykh, regarding a narration in al-Tabarani'sfrom 'Abdullah Ibn Mas'udal-Haythami narrated it in hisand said theisbut Husain did not meet Ibn Mas'ud:However Imam Muhammad narrated it in hisand added Ibrahim al-Nakha'i in the chain:And in, al-Zayla'i narrated al-Tabarani's version connecting it through Ibrahim al-Nakha'i:Could it be someofhave Ibrahim al-Nakha'i in the? Do you think you can check someof it and let me know please when you have the time?Could it be a mistake by al-Zayla'i?Jazak-Allah Khayran

Answer from Shaykh Dr. Abul Hasan Hussain Ahmed:



Assalamu 'alaikum



The wording in the printed edition of al-Mu'jam al-Kabir of al-Tabarani only has the sanad going upto Husain as you mentioned:





9422 - حَدَّثَنَا عَلِيُّ بْنُ عَبْدِ الْعَزِيزِ ، حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو نُعَيْمٍ ، حَدَّثَنَا الْقَاسِمُ بْنُ مَعْنٍ ، عَنْ حُصَيْنٍ ، قَالَ : بَلَغَ ابْنَ مَسْعُودٍ أَنَّ سَعْدًا يُوتِرُ بِرَكْعَةٍ ، قَالَ : مَا أَجْزَأَتْ رَكْعَةٌ قَطُّ



al-Zayla'i also ascribed it to al-Mu'jam al-Kabir of al-Tabarani as you mentioned but this time the name of Ibrahim al-Nakha'i was mentioned in the link. The same was mentioned by al-Hafiz ibn Hajar in his al-Diraya fi Takhrij Ahadith al-Hidaya (p. 192):



وَمن الْآثَار فِي الْوتر بِثَلَاث مَا أخرجه الطَّبَرَانِيّ من طَرِيق إِبْرَاهِيم قَالَ ابْن مَسْعُود أَن سَعْدا يُوتر بِرَكْعَة فَقَالَ مَا أَجْزَأت رَكْعَة قطّ وَأخرجه مُحَمَّد بن يَعْقُوب عَن حُصَيْن عَن إِبْرَاهِيم عَن ابْن مَسْعُود أَنه قَالَ مَا أَجْزَأت رَكْعَة قطّ



What is surprsing is that al-Haythami also used the manuscript(s) of Tabarani's three Mu'jams in his Majma' al-Zawa'id (2/504) but he only knew of the version going upto Husain as follows:





3457 - وعن حصين قال : بلغ ابن مسعود أن سعدا يوتر بركعة قال : ما أجزأت ركعة قط رواه الطبراني في الكبير وحصين لم يدرك ابن مسعود وإسناده حسن



There are two ways to look at it:



1) It may be that al-Zayla'i had access to a manuscript of al-Tabarani's al-Mu'jam al-Kabir with the ziyada in the sanad mentioning the name of Ibrahim al-Nakah'i, and the same applies to Ibn Hajar.



2) al-Zayla'i may have erred while copying and he accidentally added in the name of Ibrahim as it appeared in the Muwatta of Imam Muhammad. Since al-Diraya of Ibn Hajar is based on Nasb al-Ra'ya of al-Zayla'i, then ibn Hajar may not have gone back and checked the original manuscript of al-Tabarani's al-Mu'jam al-Kabir, as his teacher - al-Haythami did.



Note also that al-'Ayni mentioned the version from al-Shaybani in his al-Binaya Sharh al-Hidaya (2/484) and he did not mention the version from al-Tabarani at all:





وأما ما روي أيضا من الآثار فروى محمد بن الحسن في " موطأه " عن يعقوب بن إبراهيم أنا حصين عن إبراهيم عن ابن مسعود قال: ما أجزأت ركعة قط



But he did so in his Sharh Sunan Abi Dawud (5/331):





ومنها ما رواه محمد بن الحسن في " موطئه "، عن يعقوب بن إبراهيم، أنا حصين، عن إبراهيم، عن ابن مسعود، أنه قال: " ما أجزأت ركعة قط " ورواه الطبراني في ما معجمها.



But he did not provide the sanad for Tabarani's version so we can't be sure if he had the ziyada of Ibrahim al-Nakha'i in the manuscript of Tabarani's al-Mu'jam al-Kabir he may have had access to - or else he may have relied on reading a work like Nasb al-Raya which was before his time.



Nevertheless, stick to what is in the Muwatta of Muhammad which is also in his al-Hujja 'ala Ahlil Madina (1/197):





اُخْبُرْنَا يَعْقُوب بن ابراهيم قَالَ اُخْبُرْنَا حُصَيْن عَن ابراهيم عَن ابْن مَسْعُود قَالَ مَا اجزات رَكْعَة وَاحِدَة قطّ



The narration with that wording does not seem to be located in other works of hadith besides the two mentioned above.





Wallahu a'lam.



Wassalam. A few days ago I asked regarding a narration of 'Abdullah Ibn Mas'ud, where he said oneforwasn't sufficient, after Maulana Zeeshan gave a hand and pointed me in the right direction, I forwarded my question to Shaykh Abul Hasan. I'll post my question first, followed by the Shaykh's reply.Assalamu 'alaikumThe wording in the printed edition ofof al-Tabarani only has thegoing upto Husain as you mentioned:al-Zayla'i also ascribed it toof al-Tabarani as you mentioned but this time the name of Ibrahim al-Nakha'i was mentioned in the link. The same was mentioned by al-Hafiz ibn Hajar in his(p. 192):What is surprsing is that al-Haythami also used the manuscript(s) of Tabarani's threein his(2/504) but he only knew of the version going upto Husain as follows:There are two ways to look at it:1) It may be that al-Zayla'i had access to a manuscript of al-Tabarani'swith thein thementioning the name of Ibrahim al-Nakah'i, and the same applies to Ibn Hajar.2) al-Zayla'i may have erred while copying and he accidentally added in the name of Ibrahim as it appeared in theof Imam Muhammad. Sinceof Ibn Hajar is based onof al-Zayla'i, then ibn Hajar may not have gone back and checked the original manuscript of al-Tabarani's, as his teacher - al-Haythami did.Note also that al-'Ayni mentioned the version from al-Shaybani in his(2/484) and he did not mention the version from al-Tabarani at all:But he did so in his(5/331):But he did not provide thefor Tabarani's version so we can't be sure if he had theof Ibrahim al-Nakha'i in the manuscript of Tabarani'she may have had access to - or else he may have relied on reading a work likewhich was before his time.Nevertheless, stick to what is in theof Muhammad which is also in his(1/197):The narration with that wording does not seem to be located in other works ofbesides the two mentioned above.