1. Institute of Medicine. Assessing genetic risks: implications for health and social policy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 1994.

2. Clarke A, Working Party of the Clinical Genetics Society (UK). The genetic testing of children. J Med Genet. 1994;31:785–797.

3. American Society of Human Genetics Board of Directors, American College of Medical Genetics Board of Directors. Points to consider: ethical, legal, and psychosocial implications of genetic testing in children and adolescents. Am J Hum Genet. 1995;57:1233–1241.

4. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics. Ethical issues with genetic testing in pediatrics. Pediatrics. 2001;107:1451–1455.

5. Arbour L, Canadian Paediatric Society, Bioethics Committee. Guidelines for genetic testing of healthy children. Paediatr Child Health. 2003;8:42–45.

6. European Society of Human Genetics. Genetic testing in asymptomatic minors: recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009;17:720–721.

7. National Society of Genetic Counselors. NSGC position statement: genetic testing of minors for adult-onset conditions. 2017. https://www.nsgc.org/p/bl/et/blogaid=860. Accessed 20 January 2019.

8. Human Genetics Society of Australasia. Presymptomatic and predictive testing for children and young adults. 2014. https://www.hgsa.org.au/documents/item/272. Accessed 20 January 2019.

9. Wade CH, Wilfond BS, McBride CM. Effects of genetic risk information on children’s psychosocial wellbeing: a systematic review of the literature. Genet Med. 2010;12:317–326.

10. Wakefield CE, Hanlon LV, Tucker KM, et al. The psychological impact of genetic information on children: a systematic review. Genet Med. 2016;18:755–762.

11. Fryer A. Inappropriate genetic testing of children. Arch Dis Child. 2000;83:283–285.

12. Duncan R, Savulescu J, Gillam L, et al. An international survey of predictive genetic testing in children for adult onset conditions. Genet Med. 2005;7:390–396.

13. Mand C, Gillam L, Delatycki MB, Duncan RE. Predictive genetic testing in minors for late-onset conditions: a chronological and analytical review of the ethical arguments. J Med Ethics. 2012;38:519–524.

14. Fenwick A, Plantinga M, Dheensa S, Lucassen A. Predictive genetic testing of children for adult-onset conditions: negotiating requests with parents. J Genet Couns. 2017;26:244–250.

15. McCullough LB, Brothers KB, Chung WK, et al. Professionally responsible disclosure of genomic sequencing results in pediatric practice. Pediatrics. 2015;136:e974–982.

16. Wisconsin v. Yoder, et al. 406 U.S. 205 (1972).

17. Feinberg J. The child’s right to an open future. In: Feinberg J, ed. Freedom and fulfillment: philosophical essays. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1992. p. 76–97.

18. Davis DS. Genetic dilemmas and the child’s right to an open future. Hastings Cent Rep. 1997;27:7–15.

19. Davis DS. Genetic dilemmas and the child’s right to an open future. Rutgers Law J. 1997;28:549–592.

20. Davis DS. Genetic dilemmas: reproductive technology, parental choices, and children’s futures. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010.

21. Gooding HC, Wilfond B, Boehm K, Biesecker BB. Unintended messages: the ethics of teaching genetic dilemmas. Hastings Cent Rep. 2002;32:37–39.

22. Hercher L, Uhlmann WR, Hoffman EP, Gustafson S, Chen KM, Public Policy Committee of NSGC. Prenatal testing for adult-onset conditions: the position of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. J Gen Couns. 2016;25:1139–1145.

23. Mameli M. Reproductive cloning, genetic engineering and the autonomy of the child: the moral agent and the open future. J Med Ethics. 2007;33:87–93.

24. Davis DS. The parental investment factor and the child’s right to an open future. Hastings Cent Rep. 2009;39:24–27.

25. de Souza M. Regulating preimplantation genetic diagnosis in Australia: disability and parental choice. J Law Med. 2015;22:915–933.

26. Wilfond BS, Miller PS, Korfiatis C, et al. Navigating growth attenuation in children with profound disabilities: children’s interests, family decision-making, and community concerns. Hastings Cent Rep. 2010;40:27–40.

27. Bredenoord AL, Dondorp W, Pennings G, De Wert G. Ethics of modifying the mitochondrial genome. J Med Ethics. 2011;37:97–100.

28. Darby RJ. The child’s right to an open future: is the principle applicable to non-therapeutic circumcision? J Med Ethics. 2013;39:463–468.

29. Hainz T. The enhancement of children versus circumcision: a case of double moral standards? Bioethics. 2015;29:507–515.

30. Camporesi S. Bend it like Beckham! The ethics of genetically testing children for athletic potential. Sports Ethics Philos. 2013;7:175–185.

31. Loland S. Against genetic tests for athletic talent: the primacy of the phenotype. Sports Med. 2015;45:1229–1233.

32. Camporesi S, McNamee MJ. Ethics, genetic testing, and athletic talent: children’s best interests, and the right to an open (athletic) future. Physiol Genomics. 2016;48:191–195.

33. Graf WD, Nagel SK, Epstein LG, Miller G, Nass R, Larriviere D. Pediatric neuroenhancement: ethical, legal, social, and neurodevelopmental implications. Neurology. 2013;80:1251–1260.

34. Krutzinna JI. Beyond an open future. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2017;26:313–325.

35. Yu JH, Jamal SM, Tabor HK, Bamshad MJ. Self-guided management of exome and whole-genome sequencing results: changing the results return model. Genet Med. 2013;15:684–690.

36. Bredenoord AL, de Vries MC, van Delden JJ. Next-generation sequencing: does the next generation still have a right to an open future? Nat Rev Genet. 2013;14:306.

37. Bredenoord AL, de Vries MC, van Delden H. The right to an open future concerning genetic information. Am J Bioeth. 2014;14:21–23.

38. Hofmann B. Incidental findings of uncertain significance: to know or not to know—that is not the question. BMC Med Ethics. 2016;17:13.

39. Sundby A, Boolsen MW, Burgdorf KS, et al. Attitudes of stakeholders in psychiatry towards the inclusion of children in genomic research. Hum Genomics. 2018;12:12.

40. Kon AA. Ethical issues in decision-making for infants with disorders of sex development. Horm Metab Res. 2015;47:340–343.

41. Cutas D, Hens K. Preserving children’s fertility: two tales about children’s right to an open future and the margins of parental obligations. Med Health Care Philos. 2015;18:253–260.

42. Kranendork EJ, Ploem MC, Hennekam RC. Regulating biobanking with children’s tissue: a legal analysis and the experts’ view. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016;24:30–36.

43. Mason PH. Personal genomic testing, genetic inheritance, and uncertainty. J Bioeth Inq. 2017;14:583–584.

44. Morissey C, Walker RL. The ethics of general population preventive genomic sequencing: rights and social justice. J Med Philos. 2018;43:22–43.

45. Mintz RL, Loike JD, Fischbach RL Will CRISPR germline engineering close the door to an open future. Sci Eng Ethics 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0069-6. pp. 1–15. [Epub ahead of print].

46. Sziron M, Hildt E. Digital media, the right to an open future, and children 0-5. Front Psychol. 2018;9:2137.

47. Bloch M, Hayden MR. Opinion: predictive testing for Huntington disease in childhood: challenges and implications. Am J Hum Genet. 1990;46:1–4.

48. Harper PS, Clarke A. Should we test children for ‘adult’ genetic diseases? Lancet. 1990;335:1205–1206.

49. Borry P, Stultiens L, Nys H, et al. Presymptomatic and predictive genetic testing in minors: a systematic review of guidelines and position papers. Clin Genet. 2006;70:374–381.

50. Duncan RE. Predictive genetic testing in young people: when is it appropriate? J Paediatr Child Health. 2004;40:593–595.

51. Duncan RE, Delatycki MB. Predictive genetic testing in young people for adult-onset conditions: where is the empirical evidence? Clin Genet. 2006;69:8–16.

52. Borry P, Goffin T, Nys H, Dierickx K. Predictive genetic testing in minors for adult‐onset genetic diseases. Mt Sinai J Med. 2008;75:287–296.

53. Wilfond B, Ross LF. From genetics to genomics: ethics, policy, and parental decision-making. J Pediatr Psychol. 2009;34:639–647.

54. Parker M. Genetic testing in children and young people. Fam Cancer. 2010;9:15–18.

55. Clarke A. What is at stake in the predictive genetic testing of children? Fam Cancer. 2010;9:19–22.

56. Fenwick J. Are guidelines for genetic testing of children necessary? Fam Cancer. 2010;9:23–25.

57. Gilbar R. Genetic testing of children for familial cancers: a comparative legal perspective on consent, communication of information and confidentiality. Fam Cancer. 2010;9:75–87.

58. Anderson JA, Hayeems RZ, Shuman C, et al. Predictive genetic testing for adult-onset disorders in minors: a critical analysis of the arguments for and against the 2013 ACMG guidelines. Clin Genet. 2015;87:301–310.

59. Mills C. The child’s right to an open future? J Soc Philos. 2003;34:499–509.

60. Cohen CB. Wrestling with the future: should we test children for adult-onset genetic conditions? Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1998;8:111–130.

61. Millum J. The foundation of the child’s right to an open future. J Soc Philos. 2014;45:522–538.

62. Ross LF. Children, families, and health care decision making. New York: Clarendon Press; 1998.

63. Harris J, Keywood K. Ignorance, information and autonomy. Theor Med Bioeth. 2001;22:415–436.

64. Malpas P. Predictive genetic testing on children and respect for autonomy. Int J Child Right. 2005;13:273–285.

65. Robertson S, Savulescu J. Is there a case in favour of predictive genetic testing in young children? Bioethics. 2001;15:26–49.

66. Rhodes R. Why test children for adult-onset genetic diseases? Mt Sinai J Med. 2006;73:609–616.

67. Häyry M, Takala T. Genetic information, rights, and autonomy. Theor Med Bioeth. 2001;22:403–414.

68. Wenar L. Rights. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy is Edward N. Zalta. Stanford, California: Center for the Study of Language and Information (CSLI), Stanford University; 2015.

69. British Society of Human Genetics (BSHG). Report on the genetic testing of children. 2010. https://www.bsgm.org.uk/media/678741/gtoc_booklet_final_new.pdf. Accessed 20 January 2019.

70. American Society of Human Genetics Board of Directors, American College of Medical Genetics Board of Directors. Points to consider: ethical, legal, and psychosocial implications of genetic testing in children and adolescents. Am J Hum Genet. 2015;97:6–21.

71. Ross LF. Theory and practice of pediatric bioethics. Perspect Biol Med. 2016;58:267–280.

72. Diekema DS. Parental refusals of medical treatment: the harm principle as threshold for state intervention. Theor Med Bioeth. 2004;25:243–264.

73. Gillam L. Children’s bioethics and the zone of parental discretion. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2010;20:01–03.

74. Malek J. What really is in a child’s best interest? Toward a more precise picture of the interests of children. J Clin Ethics. 2009;20:175–182.

75. Clayton EW. Genetic testing in children. J Med Philos. 1997;22:233–251.

76. Lucassen A, Fenwick A. Testing children for adult onset conditions: the importance of contextual clinical judgment. J Med Ethics. 2012;38:531–532.

77. Tan N, Amendola LM, O’Daniel JM, et al. Is “incidental finding” the best term?: a study of patients’ preferences. Genet Med. 2017;19:176–181.

78. Dworkin R. Rights as trumps. In: Waldron J, ed. Theories of rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1984. p. 153–167.

79. Wilfond BS, Fernandez CV, Green RC. Disclosing secondary findings from pediatric sequencing to families: considering the “benefit to families”. J Law Med Ethics. 2015;43:552–558.

80. Creighton S, Almqvist EW, MacGregor D, et al. Predictive, pre-natal and diagnostic genetic testing for Huntington’s disease: the experience in Canada from 1987 to 2000. Clin Genet. 2003;63:462–475.

81. Morrison PJ, Harding-Lester S, Bradley A. Uptake of Huntington disease predictive testing in a complete population. Clin Genet. 2011;80:281–286.

82. Wilfond BS, Diekema DS. Engaging children in genomics research: decoding the meaning of assent in research. Genet Med. 2012;14:437–443.

83. Brothers KB, Lynch JA, Aufox SA, et al. Practical guidance on informed consent for pediatric participants in a biorepository. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014;89:1471–1480.