I wonder what the hundreds of Sea Org room cleaners, laundry people, dishwashers, gardeners etc would say to this? Or the public that see them every day?

As to the rest of the questions, and the contention that the Church “reissues or revises” courses, the entire line of questioning is utterly ludicrous and offensive. Ms. Remini knows nothing of the ecclesiastic structure of the Church’s religious services.

Seriously? You think anyone is going to believe that you DON’T revise or reissue courses. Over and over and over?

And for someone who PAID for scientology services for decades, was a trained auditor and the at the highest levels of “OT” to say she knows nothing about the church’s religious services is absurd.

We never endorse those who shatter the bonds of marriage or allow infidelity to occur.

Calling Tom Cruise….

The Church does not discuss the personal spiritual quests of its parishioners.

Unless it is convenient for us to do so.

Like the next fucking sentence of your letter.

She is what we call a “No Case Gain” due to her repeated and continuing transgressions against herself, her family, those she knows and works with and others.

Wait, you just said you never discuss this?

Oh, she is no longer a “parishioner” so it’s OK? All your “firmly held religious beliefs” are no longer firmly held when it comes to dealing with an SP? Yet you claim you do not practice “Fair Game”? Wonder what scientologist are going to think when they read this? You are not too worried about it, because you think it will worry them that perhaps THEIR personal details will be disclosed. But you overestimate the value of blackmail. It only works if the person fears the consequences. And sooner or later the horrors of the threat create exactly what you don’t want. Someone that suddenly decides they are no longer afraid of the consequences. Threats and intimidation always fail in the end.

The Church declines to comment about Mr. Cruise or his wedding in 2006—and find it absurd that ABC is asking the Church about a private wedding.

Funny, the church is more than happy to parade Tom Cruise around as their poster child. ABC asks about the behavior of church officials who attended that wedding. And one who didn’t (Shelly Miscavige).

The feigned righteous indignation is a classic Miscavige tool to avoid the question. “How dare you ask about that?” And then move on…

But it’s pretty obvious.

I imagine there are plenty of scientologists who wonder why Shelly Miscavige was NOT at the wedding in which David Miscavige served as best man. And plenty more wonder about the outrageous drunken behavior of the “minister” at the wedding hitting on Brooke Shields, Norman Starkey — the “trusted friend” of L. Ron Hubbard and “Executor of Mr. Hubbard’s Estate.”

We decline to comment. How convenient.

Ms. Remini has a history of stalking Mrs. Miscavige.

That’s just rich…

The Church does not single out anyone for its services [referring to Jennifer Lopez]

Really? Is that why a professional soccer field was constructed at the Gold Base under the direct supervision of David Miscavige so Tom Cruise could bring David Beckham to there and impress him with the brilliance of Miscavige and the value of scientology? Is that why staff were provided for the school for Will and Jada Smith’s kids? Is that why Ron Howard was wined and dined at the Gold Base by Miscavige? There are MANY examples of David Miscavige specifically targeting celebrities.

But here now is the real dead agent that is stinking up this letter, and it’s a familiar one:

There is no policy in Scientology that requires Church members to disconnect from anyone, let alone family and friends who simply have different beliefs. The Church never pressured Ms. Remini to disconnect from anyone nor did it “pressure,” mandate or otherwise cause anyone to disconnect from her.

Well, how about this policy?

It is right in the Introduction to Scientology Ethics book, page 312, listed under “Suppressive Acts”:

Failure to handle or disavow and disconnect from a person demonstrably guilty of Suppressive Acts.

It’s pretty clear to me.

And everyone else.

And the church’s statement is about as disingenuous as the infamous one made by Tommy Davis that “disconnection does not exist.”

What is most puzzling about this is that EVERY scientologist knows about disconnection and that it will be enforced against them. Every single one.

Why scientology continues to pretend that it does NOT exist, instead of just owning it and saying “Yes, we do this and it is our religious right to do so” is a sign that the conviction about their beliefs is not too high. They are afraid if they admitted to this, they would be seen as “fringe” and people would turn away from scientology. News flash Dave. It’s already too late.

All you can do is try to hang onto the sheeple you already have.

And this is NOT helping that cause as those people, more so than anyone, know this is a bald-faced lie.

And thus, you are a Dead Agent.

And just for the hell of it, because it is SO snarky. This is the final statement in their letter.

It was not one of your questions, but we will answer it right now. We are very happy that Ms. Remini is no longer in the Church. She needs to move on with her life.