I was surprised and intrigued by a comment from DKos member 'joanneleon' that the anthrax attacks came around the time of the Patriot Act was passed. Was this true?

I did a quick little research and - surprise - it is true.

The anthrax letter sent to Democrat Tom Daschle was opened by an aide on October 15, 2001. Nine days later the House passed the Patriot Act. Apparently, some of them didn't read it -- or at least, didn't read it during the reauthorization in 2006, as we know from the revelation about the US Attorney clause that was slipped in by the DOJ.

Did the hysteria and fear caused by the anthrax attacks play a factor in the passage of the Patriot Act?

Anthrax letters sent to Congress on October 9

Tom Daschle letter opened on October 15

31 Capitol workers test positive for the presence of anthrax on October 17

Patriot Act passed the House on October 24 (Yeas: 357; Nays: 66)

Patriot Act passed the Senate on October 25 (Yeas: 98; Nays: 1)

Patriot Act signed into law by President Bush on October 26

The 31 Capitol workers include five Capitol police officers, three of Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy's staffers and 23 of Democratic Senator Tom Daschle's staffers. Including the victims of the earlier letters sent to media outlets, more than 22 people ultimately developed anthrax infections. Five people died from inhalation anthrax.

Rep. Holt says:

“The FBI’s refusal to brief Members of Congress raises serious concerns about the status of this investigation and whether it is a true priority of the FBI, which appears to be no closer to solving this act of bioterrorism than they were five years ago."

Holt wants answers about an act of bioterrorism conducted in his district. The FBI and DOJ refuse to answer. Since the DOJ benefited from the passage of the Patriot Act, isn't this just a little bit suspicious?

Don't we need some oversight into this?

[UPDATED: Wow. Thanks everyone for the great, informative responses (and not too much tinfoil-hattery).

The more I look into this issue, the more it seems like an excellent and needed subject of Congressional oversight. Talk about NOT PROTECTING American citizens! Democrats could make a really strong statement about who is really looking out for America's safety by demanding answers into why this investigation has been stalled under the Bush Administration. Let's ask Waxman and Conyers about it!]