Hillary Clinton

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton listens during a campaign event, Thursday, April 21, 2016, in Hartford, Conn. Clinton stopped in Hartford for a discussion on gun violence prevention with family members of gun violence victims. (AP Photo/Jessica Hill)

(Jessica Hill)

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has

by all sides of the political spectrum for her lack of transparency on speeches big banks and other corporations have paid her to make.

It's not just Wall Street. According to an Associated Press review, most companies and groups that paid Clinton to speak between 2013 and 2015 have lobbied federal agencies in recent years, and more than one-third are government contractors.

The review showed that almost all the 82 corporations, trade associations and other groups that paid for or sponsored her speeches have actively sought to sway the government in some form.

Rival Democratic candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders and Republican critics have slammed Clinton over her closed-door talks to banks and investment firms, saying she is too closely aligned to Wall Street to curb its abuses.

Sanders recently goaded her for declining to release the transcripts of the speeches. He claims she earned an average of about $225,000 for each speech.

Clinton yesterday said she will release transcripts of her paid speeches when other political candidates do the same.

Some of said releasing of the speeches would end her presidential campaign.

Should Clinton release transcripts of her paid speeches?