thank you for the clarification, that's what I was asking for, as I was making sure that I understood "offensive militia are "tied" to offending "forts", and once offending forts are destroyed , offending militia are removed"



As far as having it addressed, I'm not sure if that comment was intended to be snarky or not? I'm not complaining about the system. I'm merely looking at the feedback being posted here and elaborating objectively on how that could possibly be improved upon.

Click to expand...