Super Bowl Era NFL Dynasties Dynasty Requirement : Participate in a conference championship games within four years. Designed for 1-page printing See foxsports Top 9 thesportster Top 10 Return to Quick Notes Sports Please comment s to Walter at antonw@ix.netcom.com

Division Conference1 SB SB Scores SB Points Cheating Record

Team/Years Titles Record Record Score1 Real Cheats

1. New England

2001-2016

16 seasons 14 7 + 4 = 11 games

02, 04, 05, 07 , 08

12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 5 and 2

02, 04, 05

08,12 ,15,17 20>17 SL, 32>29 Ca

24>21 Ph, 14<17 NY

17<21 NY , 28>24 S,34>28 At 169 - 157 = 12 20 6

Team/NE

Should a weak division cause a lower ranking?

2. San Francisco

1981-1997

16 seasons 13 5 + 4 = 10 games

82, 85. 89, 90

91, 93 , 94 , 95, 5 and 0

82, 85, 89, 90, 95

26>21 Cin, 38>16 Mi, 23 >16 Cin, 55 >10 D

49>26 SD 191 - 89 = 94 35 8

Team /SF

Should SF be changed because of large point spread dominance & using two quarterbacks?

3. Pittsburgh #1

1972-80

8 seasons 7 4 + 1 = 5 games

75, 76, 77, 79, 80 4 and 0

75, 76, 79,80 16>6 Min, 21>17 Dal

35>31 Dal, 31> 19 LA 103 - 73 = 30 40 10

Team/PIT

Should Pitt gets the nod over Miami because playoffs were more difficult with new 1978 Wild Card?

4. Miami

1971-74

4 seasons 4

2 + 1 = 3 games

72, 73, 74 2 and 1

72 , 73, 74 3<24 Dal , 14>7 Was,

24 > 7 Min 41 - 38 = 3 30 10

Team/MIA

Should loss of 3 offensive stars to World Football League after 1974 season affect ranking?

5. Green Bay

1960-68

2 or 9? seasons 2

2 + 0 = games

67, 68 2 and 0

67, 68 35>10 KC

33>14 Oak 68 - 24 = 44 27 7

Team/GB

Does 4 Pre SB conference titles 60 , 61, 62, 65 & and 3 NFC championships move them up ?

6. Dallas

1967-85

19 seasons 11 6 + 5 = 11 games

67*, 71, 72, 73 , 74

76, 78, 79, 81,82,83 2 and 3

71 , 72, 76

78, 79 13<16 B , 24>3 M

17<21 P , 27>10 D

31<35 P 112 - 85 = 27 22 8

Team/DAL

Are Loses to B. Colts and great Pit plus outscoring opponents enough to move up over GB, Mia?

7. Washington

1982 -1992

10 seasons 4 4 + 1 = 5 games

83, 84, 87, 88, 92 3 and 1

83, 84 , 88, 92 27>17 M, 9<38 LA

42>10 D, 37>24 B 115 - 89 = 26 31 9

Team/WAS

Was call over Pittsburg as they opposed the great SF dynasty plus a tough division correct?

8. Pittsburgh #2

1994- 2011

18 seasons 10 4 + 4 = 8

95, 96, 98,02, 05

06, 09, 11 2 and 2

96, 06, 09, 11 17<27 Dal , 21>10 Sea

27>23 Ari, 25<31 GB 90 - 91 = -1

Should 8 champion appearances, 3rd most to NE and SF, move them up?

9. Dallas #2

1992-98

7 seasons 6 3 + 1 = 4 games

93, 94, 95 , 96 3 and 0

93, 94, 96 52>17 B, 30 >13 B

27 >17 P 109 - 47 = 63

Is 3-0 in SB and loss to SF better than P's 2-2 but 8 conference championship games?

10. Oakland

1973-81

9 seasons 4 2 + 4 = 6 games

74, 75, 76, 77 ,78, 81

2 and 0

77, 81

32 >14 Min

27 > 10 Phi 59 - 24 - 35

Does only 2 Super Bowls lower them to 10 even though they lost to great Miami and Pittsburg teams?

Washington

1982-91

11 seasons 4 3 + 1= 4 games

83, 84, 87, 88, 92 3 + 1 = 4 games

83, 84, 88, 92 27>17 Mia, 38 >9 <38 Oak

42 >10 Den, 10 >7 8 8 - 72

Should they go ahead of Washington?

12. Buffalo

1989 - 95

6 seasons 5 4 + 1 games 89 , 91, 92, 93, 94 0 and 4 91, 92, 93,94 19<20 NY, 24<37 Was,

17<52 Dal, 30<13 D An NFC winning strake of 6 was eventually extended to 12 with a B missed FG. 18 5

Team/BUF

13. Minnesota

1968-80

13 seasons 11 3 + 1 = games 74, 75, 77, 78 0 and 3 74, 75, 77 7<24 Mia, 6<16 Pit, 14<32 Oak Why didn't dominating division help as it seemed to help NE and SF? 23 5

Team/MIN

14. LA Rams

1973-79

7 seasons 7 1 + 4 = games 75, 76, 77, 79, 80 0 and 1 80 19<31 P Should losses to great NFC teams Min, Dal Min, Dal and Pit teams keep them off list?

1 Cheats as of 2015 14 3

Team/STL