A part of patriarchy is to control female reproduction. Usually it is done by threat of violence or by threat of withdrawing support which is a kind of emotional violence. If a man lives with a woman and she desires another man�s seed then that is her prerogative. A man will love a child that is not biologically his just as much as one that is. If there is such a thing as �misandry� then it is only through patriarchal thinking, such as the hate of raising another man�s biological child, that it rears its head. Luckily law reflects feminist thought when it comes to this. At least after marriage. If a woman is married, finds a particularly appealing man whose seed she desires, she may let him fill her with it and as long as her husband does not divorce before the child is born he owes her support by law. This is as it should be. The only way she may be deprived of her right is if a paternity test is done and paternity is contested in court. If the man has acted as a father long enough he, by law, becomes the father. Further legislation is needed. It should simply be the case that a woman chooses a father. If a man is intimate with a woman and they have a relationship that is of a loving kind, then he should owe her support. Either through his person, which is preferable, or monetary. Society will only move forward when such legislation is in place.In short: A woman should be in complete control of what seed she allows in her womb, not a man. Any coercion to restrict her right to choose, such as threatening to leave and withdraw support, is misogyny.