Which of course brings us to today, wherein Trump has gone and done the exact same thing that he and other Republicans have accused Reps. Omar and Tlaib of doing. Earlier this year, when Omar implied that some Jewish people are more loyal to Israel than the United States, Trump seized on the comments as evidence that Omar is an enemy of not only Israel, but all Jews. Now he’s saying that Jews are a monolith and should vote exclusively based on their religious interests—which Trump falsely and inaccurately conflates with the interests of Benjamin Netanyahu’s right wing government.

Shockingly, Tuesday’s little exercise in anti-Semitism didn‘t go over super well with actual Jews. “It’s unclear who @POTUS is claiming Jews would be ‘disloyal’ to, but charges of disloyalty have long been used to attack Jews,” tweeted Jonathan Greenblatt, CEO of the Anti-Defamation League. “As we’ve said before, it’s possible to engage in the democratic process w/o these claims. It’s long overdue to stop using Jews as a political football.”

In a statement, Halie Soifer, executive director of the Jewish Democratic Council of America, told the Hill: “At a time when anti-Semitic incidents have increased—due to the president’s emboldening of white nationalism—Trump is repeating an anti-Semitic trope. If this is about Israel, then Trump is repeating a dual loyalty claim, which is a form of anti-Semitism. If this is about Jews being ‘loyal’ to him, then Trump needs a reality check.”

If you would like to receive the Levin Report in your inbox daily, click here to subscribe.

Analyst: WeWork IPO a dazzling array of inscrutable bullshit

Rett Wallace, like many who came before him, does not have a high opinion of this particular coworking biz:

The We Co., which is expected to raise about $3.5 billion in what would be 2019’s second-biggest initial public offering, must have put in a great effort to conceal the unit economics underlying the coworking space provider, said Triton Research Inc. Chief Executive Officer Rett Wallace. “The prospectus is a masterpiece of obfuscation,” he said in an interview. “If the underlying facts were positive, why would a company go to so much trouble to prevent you from understanding them?”