Ok, lets be fair. The title is kind of misleading to make you angry so you can click on it to comment how stupid I am to support those unexperimented developers. Sorry for that, but it worked.

So hold on for a minute, read a few more lines and maybe we can agree on something. If you already insulted me on reddit after reading the title, don´t worry, I can live with that.

First thing first, I don´t know if Bitcoin Classic will achieve 75% of hashing power ever. I probably think they won´t. What I do know is that Classic has accomplished a lot on the Bitcoin community. Not on the technical side but still. Let me recap some of what I consider Classic achievements:

Bitcoin Core has now a new website , with meeting logs and a better way to communicate with the rest of the community. I know, you will say that they already used bitcoin.org and moved, but the truth is, that if they didn´t think that owning a dedicated website on 2016 was a priority, it should make you wonder.

, with meeting logs and a better way to communicate with the rest of the community. I know, you will say that they already used bitcoin.org and moved, but the truth is, that if they didn´t think that owning a dedicated website on 2016 was a priority, it should make you wonder. Core´s new Slack channel open for the rest of the community. This is a big step, we can now read and even comment while the core devs discuss the future of the protocol. I don´t really think it was a coincidence that this new channel was opened one week after Classic opened their own channel.

open for the rest of the community. This is a big step, we can now read and even comment while the core devs discuss the future of the protocol. I don´t really think it was a coincidence that this new channel was opened one week after Classic opened their own channel. Core developers tour on podcasts on the past two months explaining why they think that their roadmap is better than what Classic is proposing. Peter Todd, Adam Back, and several others giving extremely valuable opinions and explaining SW, the difficulties / risks of a hard fork and so on.

on the past two months explaining why they think that their roadmap is better than what Classic is proposing. Peter Todd, Adam Back, and several others giving extremely valuable opinions and explaining SW, the difficulties / risks of a hard fork and so on. Satoshi Roundatable and other meetings between miners, devs and exchanges, probably this one is the least productive as we could not have in the same table Classic and Core devs as it seems that they can´t stand each other. But it still a step forward.

As a summary communication, communication and communication. It´s been 2 months of 2016 and we probably have had more communication and learned about the Core team than in the past 2 years.

So, I really think that Classic already won. Or let me rephrase it, Bitcoin already won.