Photo credit: nymag.com

We've wasted countless millions of taxpayer dollars to investigate the false claims of Russia Collusion under Special Counsel Robert Mueller and the only results that have been provided thus far shows proof of Clinton bias with now removed Agent Peter Strzok exposing the entire investigation as a fraud.

General Michael Flynn, for example, has had his good name dragged through the mud and his entire career ripped apart, forced into a guilty plea by an agent who had an incomprehensible bias to begin with.

Not to mention that it now appears as if the entire investigation into the actual crimes against Hillary Clinton was infiltrated, and botched, since we now know that Peter Strzok was was working as the number two involved in investigating the misuse and improper handling of Hillary Clinton's email server, and simultaneously having been working to protect the Clintons.

Peter Strzok also improperly manipulated the findings of that investigation, to manipulate the final conclusion given by James Comey in order to give the impression that Hillary Clinton's aides, Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills, had done nothing wrong.

Essentially Peter Strzok, as we now know, is veraciously Anti-Trump, and Pro-Hillary Clinton, and may even potentially have committed Federal Crimes in the cover-up of he actually crimes committed by the Clinton Campaign and her aides (it's believed so but this is not something that I can determine, but for Congress and a multitude of committees to decide).

As if matters weren't already incredibly shady between Strzok and his Clinton bias, he was appointed as a leading agent into Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s (also biased) investigation into the Trump Campaign and transitional team's nonexistent alleged Russian Collusion investigation, even whilst having this obvious pro-Clinton, Anti-Trump bias.

In addition to this, Peter Strzok was able to obtain a partial confession from General Michael Flynn that led to a plea deal, which was obtained via fraud, since the Mueller team never granted any disclosure of the exculpatory material surrounding Peter Strzok to his defense (the obvious defense perspective here is that Michael Flynn should seek to have his confession and plea deal thrown out as null and void because of this).

At some point during the investigation, it became known to Robert Mueller that Peter Strzok was corrupted, allegedly after Anti-Trump text messages were discovered being sent by Strzok to and from a mistress, which has remained in the headlines for weeks now, and as previously reported, the support to the Clintons and Obama was hidden and covered up by <a href="https://thegoldwater.com/news/13406-Anti-Trump-Double-Agent-Peter-Strzok-Wife-Destroy-Evidence-of-Collusion-w-Clintons"> Strzok’s own wife on social media in an effort to remove any sign that there was a bias</a>.

Due to this revelation, Peter Strzok was removed from the investigation itself, and now could be summoned before a Congressional hearing if not indicted by a Grand Jury himself for what are clearly crimes during the Clinton investigation that he botched himself.

Now we're being told specifics of some text messages from FBI Agent Peter Strzok, which he referred to a political meeting that occurred inside or FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe’s office, saying in August of 2016 that read, “I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office, that there’s no way [Trump] gets elected, but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40.”

What the hell did Peter Strzok mean by this?

Some would assume that now it was intentionally planned from day one for Peter Strzok to help perpetuate the lies that the Trump Campaign has some sort of “Russian Collusion”, all after he had personally conducted the interviews with two of Hillary Clinton's aides who were accused of giving false statements about what they knew of the former Secretary of State's private email server.

As both an FBI Agent and the Section Chief at the time, Peter Strzok, allegedly determined that neither of the two Clinton Associates, Huma Abedin or Cheryl Mills, should face any subsequent charges as a result of giving those false statements, showing that he had intent to cover up the crimes.

We know this because the alleged double agent, Peter Strzok, actually changed Comey’s description of Hillary Clinton to “extremely careless”, and was considered as the number two person in charge of the investigation into Hillary Clinton at the time.

In doing this to the Clinton investigation, it possibly allowed Huma and Mills and possibly even Hillary Clinton to walk away free without charge, by defining the way Hillary Clinton was perceived.

Yes, those words matter and they're important.

”The shift from ‘grossly negligent’ to ‘extremely careless,’ which may appear pedestrian at first glance, reflected a decision by the FBI that could have had potentially significant legal implications, as the federal law governing the mishandling of classified material establishes criminal penalties for ‘gross negligence.’”

By making this change it essentially allowed Hillary Clinton to avoid charges.

Not only does this further give President Trump credit for firing James Comey, because he clearly knew this was happening since he was the FBI Director, and should have been aware, but this raises doubts about Andrew McCabe too, who was working right alongside Peter Strzok and James Comey at the time of these changes and said nothing; as well as the fact that Peter Strzok is now on record sending text messages about an alleged meeting in McCabe’s office where he called himself an “insurance policy”.

In fact, FBI Deputy Director McCabe was already on the radar of Congress for his perceived bias, with Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) raising questions about possible conflicts of interest with acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe and the FBI’s investigation into former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn this past summer.

At that time Senator Grassley sent the following<a href="https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2017-06-28%20CEG%20to%20DOJ%20(McCabe%20Continuing%20Conflicts%20Follow%20Up).pdf"> letter to Rod Rosenstein </a>about what he perceived as a “conflict of interest” involving Andrew McCabe:

<blockquote>”Dear Mr. Rosenstein,”</blockquote>

<blockquote>”On May 2, 2017, I wrote to you regarding Acting Director McCabe’s apparent conflicts in ongoing FBI investigations due to, among other things, his relationship with Governor Terry McAuliffe and asked what steps you have taken to address the appearance of political bias at the FBI. It now appears that Acting Director McCabe is the subject of three separate pending investigations. ”</blockquote>

<blockquote>”First, the Department of Justice Office of Inspector General is examining his failure to recuse himself from the Clinton investigation due to his political relationship with McAuliffe. ”</blockquote>

<blockquote>”Second, the Office of Special Counsel (OSC) is investigating allegations that he violated the Hatch Act by engaging in political campaign activities.”</blockquote>

<blockquote>”Third, he is also reportedly the subject of a pending Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) complaint by a female FBI agent for sex discrimination, who alleges she was targeted for retaliation because of her complaint.”</blockquote>

<blockquote>”According to new press reports, Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn provided a letter of support for the complainant in that case, which raises serious questions about why Mr. McCabe also failed to recuse himself from investigations involving Mr. Flynn.”</blockquote>

<blockquote>”In addition, a recent press report states that three FBI employees, “personally witnessed McCabe make disparaging remarks about Flynn before and during the time the retired Army general emerged as a figure in the Russia case.”</blockquote>

<blockquote>”That evidence and the failure to recuse calls into question whether Mr. McCabe handled the Flynn investigation fairly and objectively, or whether he had any retaliatory motive against Flynn for being an adverse witness to him in a pending proceeding.”</blockquote>

<blockquote>”In the May 2 letter, I noted the FBI’s failure to respond to the Committee’s previous questions. However, to date, you have failed to respond. On December 14, 2016, the FBI provided the ethical and recusal protocol applied to Mr. McCabe regarding his potential conflicts of interest in ongoing and future FBI investigations. ”</blockquote>

<blockquote>”Oddly, Mr. McCabe was the approval authority for his own recusal memo. That document contains a number of redactions. The Committee requires unredacted copies of the document for its inquiry.”</blockquote>

<blockquote>”Accordingly, please provide an unredacted copy of the attached document no later than July 12, 2017. In addition, please provide a written explanation of the steps you intend to take as Mr. McCabe’s supervisor to address the appearance of political and other conflicts of interest outlined above. ”</blockquote>

<blockquote>”I anticipate that your written reply and any responsive documents will be unclassified. Please send all unclassified material directly to the Committee. In keeping with the requirements of Executive Order 13526, if any of the responsive documents do contain classified information, please segregate all unclassified material within the classified documents, provide all unclassified information directly to the Committee, and provide a classified addendum to the Office of Senate Security. Although the Committee complies with all laws and regulations governing the handling of classified information, it is not bound, absent its prior agreement, by any handling restrictions or instructions on unclassified information unilaterally asserted by the Executive Branch.”</blockquote>

<blockquote>”Thank you in advance for your cooperation with this request. If you have questions, contact Josh Flynn-Brown of my Judiciary Committee staff at (202) 224-5225.”</blockquote>

<blockquote>”Sincerely,”</blockquote>

<blockquote>”Charles E. Grassley”</blockquote>

<blockquote>”Chairman”</blockquote>

<blockquote>”Senate Committee on the Judiciary”</blockquote>

Senator Grassley pointed towards that the Justice Department inspector general is investigating whether McCabe should have recused himself from the Hillary Clinton email probe, since Andrew McCabe’s wife took donations from Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe, a Clinton ally, when she ran for a Virginia state Senate seat.

Senator Grassley also threw punched at Andrew McCabe over a gender-discrimination complaint filed against the FBI. The Senator said that Michael Flynn filed a letter of support for the FBI agent who reported the discrimination.

“That evidence and the failure to recuse calls into question whether Mr. McCabe handled the Flynn investigation fairly and objectively, or whether he had any retaliatory motive against Flynn for being an adverse witness to him in a pending proceeding,” Grassley wrote.

It's overwhelmingly clear at this point that all the people who targeted Michael Flynn has reason to do so, and that if Michael Flynn attorneys were examining this, they would have already filed a motion to toss out any plea agreement due to the conflicts of interest which are blatantly clear.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Problem is that the acting head of the FBI & the person in charge of the Hillary investigation, Andrew McCabe, got $700,000 from H for wife!</p>— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/889792764363276288?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 25, 2017</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The fact that both McCabe and Strzok were even involved in any Clinton investigation, or any efforts to investigate President Trump or his transition team, shows an overwhelming sense of incompetence by the FBI and a bias that obviously has to go back to Rod Rosenstein himself, since he appointed Special Counsel Robert Mueller to begin with, and neither Mueller nor Rosenstein have addressed these plain-as-day conflicts of interest.

It seems shocking to me that everyday Americans and journalists are having to uncover these truths, when millions of taxpayer dollars are being wasted on these witch hunts.

Those who have witnessed what's occurring, such as Trey Gowdy, have since annihilated Robert Mueller, and rightfully so in light of the career of corruption from the Special Counsel, which we've talked about repeatedly here.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Trey Gowdy SMASHES Deep State / Clinton Puppet Special Counsel Robert Mueller<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/RedPill?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#RedPill</a><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Goldwater?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Goldwater</a><a href="https://t.co/orOhRCShhH">https://t.co/orOhRCShhH</a></p>— Red Pill (@IWillRedPillYou) <a href="https://twitter.com/IWillRedPillYou/status/941114042894106625?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 14, 2017</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Anyone who tells you that Special Counsel Robert Mueller is a good guy, is incompetent, a child, uninformed, or a paid disinformation agent.

I repeat that over, and over, and over.

Robert Mueller is NOT a good man, and <a href="http://thegoldwater.com/news/13950-Trey-Gowdy-SMASHES-Deep-State-Clinton-Puppet-Special-Counsel-Robert-Mueller">as previously reported his entire career is covered in horrifying actions</a>.

Those atrocities included in his youth as Acting US Attorney in Boston, indirectly<a href="https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/1970/01/19/one-lingering-question-for-fbi-director-robert-mueller/613uW0MR7czurRn7M4BG2J/story.html"> assisting in an FBI effort to frame four innocent men for murder</a>, in which the FBI did so to protect the “Whitey Bulger Gang” (Mafia) who were their informants. In that case two of the men wrongfully convicted died in prison, all over the FBI wanting to protect mobsters, and a lawsuit over the matter later cost the taxpayers $100 million.

That's partially why Mueller ended up promoted to the FBI under the infamous warmongering globalist George W. Bush, because they knew he could become a puppet.

After doing so it's alleged that be ignored intelligence warning of 9/11 prior to it occurring, and there's zero doubt Mueller was warned that Iraq had nothing to do with the September 11th attacks,<a href="https://mobile.nytimes.com/2003/03/05/politics/full-text-of-fbi-agents-letter-to-director-mueller.html"> via a letter from FBI Special Agent Coleen Rowley directly to him </a>warning that Al-Qaeda and Iraq were two entirely different battlefronts, unrelated, yet he still perpetuates the lie that Iraq somehow had WMDs or posed a threat towards the United States, both of which have cost Americans a two decade long illegal war built upon false pretenses where millions of civilians have died, trillions of dollars have been wasted, and thousands of US Forces have lost their lives.

<a href="https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/09STATE85588_a.html#efmBbpBlP">Wikileaks Cables show that Robert Mueller personally has ties to Russia</a>, considering he flew into Russia and hand-delivered Highly Enriched Uranium himself.

That alone means that Mueller shouldn't even be allowed to oversee any investigation into Russia.

This entire Special Counsel role is a farce, it's a disaster, and it's going to end very badly for someone.

It's an outrage that Mueller is even sitting in that chair, and anyone who has the audacity to say “he's on our side” after I just showed you the facts surrounding Mueller likely has an IQ below 80. Robert Mueller is a Globalist puppet. Period.

In essence what this amounts to is a completely shit-show, where Robert Mueller himself is a corrupt tool of the Deep State, Andrew McCabe is a Clinton backing leech, and Peter Strzok is clearly a slug that just keeps sticking his nose in wherever he could in order to prevent having salt poured on him by the Clintons.

The real collusion, the real crimes, are inside of these Federal Law Enforcement agencies, and only further give credence to the idea that Americans should not trust the intelligence community; for it lacks one of the two words that define it.

This is making America the laughingstock of the world. How embarrassing is our Federal Government, at this point? Sad.

—<i>[email protected]</i>

<i>On Twitter:</i>

<a href="https://www.twitter.com/IWillRedPillYou">@IWillRedPillYou</a>

Tips? Info? Send me a message!