A new data source became available in April, at the U.C. Berkeley SDA archive, and that’s the American National Election Studies (ANES) 2016. This provides a cornucopia of information not available in the exit polls.

I ran this report selecting only non-Hispanic white voters.

In this dataset, among this demographic, Trump beat Clinton by 52.5% to 40.2%

However, the breakdown by income clearly shows that those with the top incomes swung decisively for Clinton. Trump’s support came from whites with income below than $110,000/year. Note that study asks for “family income.”

Income below $110,000: Trump beats Clinton 55.7% to 36.7%

Income $110,000 and above: Clinton beats Trump 50.3% to 43.3%

I have a screenshot below of the entire output.

* * *

When you remove the race and ethnicity constraints from the data, Clinton beat Trump by 53.7% to 39.6% among respondents with income of $110,000 and higher.

Note that the ANES, like most polls, has a pro-Clinton and anti-Trump bias. The full weighted data set shows that 48.8% voted for Clinton, while the actual popular vote is 48.2%. And the dataset has 44.0% voting for Trump when the actual popular vote was 46.1%. I attribute this to the shy Trump voter effect