With some recent readings I’ve done in mind, I’d definitely now make a change to the Mage/Social Ecology choice – replacing it with Ecosocialism – for a few reasons:

1) Joel Kovel, a major figure in ecosocialist discourse, wrote extensively about spiritual transcendence in his book History and Spirit, which reads leftist implications into the mage’s mysticism. (I’m only about halfway through this one but so far I’d definitely recommend it to comrades with spiritual inclinations.) His broad metaphysical sensibilities can also be found in parts of Enemy of Nature too (which has a much more concrete political theme overall).

2) Bookchin was pretty deeply opposed to spiritual elements in the green movements he was involved in, to the point where he’d probably resent being assigned the mage in this trope triad. (And he was definitely right to come down hard on a lot of the appropriative New Age stuff that white hippies jump into, but painting all of spirituality with that brush is misguided.)

3) Most understandings of social ecology position it as an anarchist philosophy (or at the very least on the “deeply decentralist” side of the spectrum). On the other hand – especially with Kovel, Marcuse, and others in mind – ecosocialism advances a “plan C” that can be differentiated from traditional Marxism’s vanguard party and anarchism’s “smash the state”. Much of this third philosophy could be described as “centrist leftism” mixed with radical green politics, and it can be read about in the final chapter of Enemy of Nature.

So maybe this representation would work out better: