23 July 2012 16,327 views 23 Comments

Editor’s note

The following analysis was emailed to me by Jonathan Azaziah after I had asked him for his thoughts on Communism. Specifically I asked Jonathan how one can reconcile the notion that Communism is supposed to be an ideology based on altruism and social justice, while, in the case of the Bolshevik Revolution, it has been characterised by tyranny, terrorism, and unspeakable suffering.

by Jonathan Azaziah.

I do not, repeat, do NOT view Communism (Marxism) as a movement and ideology based on social justice by any means. Communism was not birthed by Karl Marx (son of a long line of racist, supremacist Talmudic rabbis) and Friedrich Engels as it is so often said. It is actually the work of the racist, supremacist, maniacal Talmudic rabbi Moses Hess, who also introduced Zionism to the world with his book “Rome and Jerusalem.” Karl Marx called Hess his “red rabbi”, and Hess viewed Communism as a means controlling Gentiles through crypto-Judaic thought and subsequently using their “revolutions” of communist mobilization to usher in an age controlled by Zionism. This is discussed at length in Michael A. Hoffman II’s groundbreaking book “Discovering Judaism”.

Persons of the “communist” or more broadly, the “leftist” persuasion have a difficult time admitting this fact or even looking into it because then their precious dogma would be completely and utterly shattered. More importantly, for all of Marx’s anti-capitalist writings and ravings, is it not impeccably odd that he never once, not even ONCE, criticized the Rothschilds and other Jewish-Zionist banking giants during his time? There is no doubt, thanks to the works of Professor Niall Ferguson known as “House of Rothschild (Volumes 1 and 2)”, which are based on official Rothschild family documents, that this Jewish dynasty controlled the colonial powers at this time through their central banks. A central bank, by the way, is central to Marxism. Again, impeccably odd, no? So again, why no criticism of the greatest plutocratic parasitic capitalists of his era and of his time??

Mikhail Bakunin, the father of anarchism and another hero of the “left” has the answer, although you will NEVER hear leftists bring this up,

This whole Jewish world, comprising a single exploiting sect, a kind of blood sucking people, a kind of organic destructive collective parasite, going beyond not only the frontiers of states, but of political opinion, this world is now, at least for the most part, at the disposal of Marx on the one hand, and of Rothschild on the other… This may seem strange. What can there be in common between socialism and a leading bank? The point is that authoritarian socialism, Marxist communism, demands a strong centralisation of the state. And where there is centralisation of the state, there must necessarily be a central bank, and where such a bank exists, the parasitic Jewish nation, speculating with the Labour of the people, will be found.” Here is a more complete quote, “Marx is a Jew and is surrounded by a crowd of little, more or less intelligent, scheming, agile, speculating Jews, just as Jews are everywhere — commercial and banking agents, writers, politicians, correspondents for newspapers of all shades; in short, literary brokers, just as they are financial brokers, with one foot in the bank and the other in the socialist movement, and their arses sitting upon the German press. They have grabbed hold of all newspapers, and you can imagine what a nauseating literature is the outcome of it …. Now this entire Jewish world, which constitutes an exploiting sect, a people of leeches, a voracious parasite, closely and intimately connected with another, regardless not only of frontiers but of political differences as well — this Jewish world is today largely at the disposal of Marx or Rothschild. I am sure that, on the one hand, the Rothschilds appreciate the merits of Marx, and that on the other hand, Marx feels an instinctive inclination and a great respect for the Rothschilds. This may seem strange. What could there be in common between communism and high finance? Ho ho! The communism of Marx seeks a strong state centralization, and where this exists, there the parasitic Jewish nation — which speculates upon the labor of people — will always find the means for its existence …. In reality, this would be for the proletariat a barrack-regime, under which the workingmen and the workingwomen, converted into a uniform mass, would rise, fall asleep, work, and live at the beat of the drum. The privilege of ruling would be in the hands of the skilled and the learned, with a wide scope left for profitable crooked deals carried on by the Jews, who would be attracted by the enormous extension of the international speculations of the national banks.

Truer words on the matter haven’t been spoken.

When this is then reconciled with the Bolshevik Revolution, which was indeed overwhelming Jewish, it all becomes cohesive. The Bolshevik Revolution began with Jews, was controlled by a Jews, was run by Jews, etc. The “revolutionaries”, again, for all their anti-capitalist fervor, actually took money from a Rothschild agent, and one of the greatest capitalists to ever live, Jacob Schiff, whose children intermarried into the Rothschild family. He gave Trotsky and Lenin $20 million to overthrow the Tsar and bragged about it on his death bed. Moreover, it was Schiff who financed Japan during the Russo-Japanese war to the tune of $200 million, facilitating a Japanese victory, the weakening of the Tsarist state and the beginnings of Bolshevik mobilization that would bear fruit a decade later. And this is NOT “anti-Semitic conspiracy theory”, it can be found in the landmark book on Jewish history and the beginnings of the Jewish Lobby in America, “To Free A People” by Gary Dean Best and “The Jewish Century”, an award-winning work on Jewish history by Professor Yuri Slezkine. The Bolshevik security apparatus, the NKVD (or Cheka), was also largely Jewish, and this is further confirmed by “Israeli” author Sever Plocker in his Ynet article “Stalin’s Jews”. The two greatest mass murderers of all-time, Genrikh Yagoda, the father of the Soviet gulag system and Lazar Kagonovich, Stalin’s right hand and perpetrator of the Holodomor in the Ukraine, were Jewish Bolsheviks. Men forgotten by history. Why? Why are the crimes of these men not discussed? Because any criticism of Jews on any level is deemed “anti-Semitic” by this Orwellian society. Even Stalin, a treacherous, gangster-like mass murderer who worked with the Zionist-driven Allied Powers during WW2, was murdered when he stood up to Jewish power in Russia. He was poisoned on Purim. Sound familiar?

In conclusion, Communism, which seeks to centralize the entire planet, making it one gigantic super-state (a one world government, a new world order), and Capitalism (a means of financial unification through international banking {founded by the Rothschilds} and neoliberalism {founded by Milton Friedman}, a one world government, a new world order) are two heads of the same Jewish-Zionist dragon. No matter which one comes to power, it is Jewish interests who come out on top. This isn’t to say every communist or Marxist is an evil, twisted puppet of International Zionism, of course not. Such assertions are moronic, lazy and ignorant. Persons like Castro, Guevara, the great Thomas Sankara of Burkina Faso (murdered by Mossad and CIA), Morales, Correa, Ghassan Kanafani Mossadegh, Allende, etc. were and are good men, obviously. But as a whole, its origins, and as evidenced by the mass murder carried out by the Bolsheviks, Mao, and others allied with these forces, Communism is the greatest killing machine known to man, excluding the imperialism of the United States, which is controlled through the Federal Reserve by the same plutocratic powers that propped up the “revolution” of the Bolsheviks. And therefore, it cannot be relied on to deliver “social justice” to anyone. No conspiracy theory here… just conspiracy fact.