Importantly, this was Manoranjana Sinh’s second petition to the Company Law Board “seeking impleadment” of Navin Jindal in her cases against Positiv Television. The CLB had rejected her first petition as it found that prima facie there was no evidence that Naveen Jindal had breached any previous order of the CLB. The previous order that the CLB cited here refers to one passed by the CLB on May 29, 2009. This was in response to another of Manoranjana’s petitions (against Positiv Television Private Limited) that Matang Sinh had unlawfully reduced her share holding to 9 per cent from the original 50 per cent she used to hold when Matang Sinh and she had initially founded the company. As you can see, the honeymoon was well and truly over for Matang and Manoranjana.