The cartoon illustrated a police officer lifting up a teenager by his shirt collar. Speaking to an Aboriginal man holding an open car of beer, the policeman says: “You’ll have to sit down and talk to your son about personal responsibility.” The man replies, “Yeah, righto — what’s his name then?”

AD

AD

After receiving a complaint from two Aboriginal men, the commission is considering if the cartoon, published in August, breaches a ban on insulting or humiliating anyone on the basis of race or national origin. Offenders can be sued but can’t be sent to jail.

The body that oversees newspaper standards launched its own an investigation after receiving 700 complaints from the public.

The racial vilification law is bitterly opposed by conservatives, who have campaigned against it for years. By portraying the commission’s investigation as a dangerous infringement of free speech and bureaucratic overreach, they built enough political momentum to convince the center-right Turnbull government this month to instruct a parliamentary committee to review the law, the first stage to abolishing or changing it.

AD

AD

“It’s a bad, bad law but you’ve also got, frankly, a pretty crook [sick] organization, the Human Rights Commission, which is persecuting people based on this bad law,” a former prime minister and leading conservative, Tony Abbott, said in a television interview on Nov. 11.

The review began Nov. 8. In a rare moment of unity, Jewish and Muslim groups are trying to mobilize public support for the law, which they regard as an important protection against oral and written abuse that sometimes leads to violence.

“At a time when xenophobia in Australia is rising, this legal provision is essential to help maintain social cohesion,” said Colin Rubenstein, the executive director of the Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council, in an email.

AD

There are protections in the law for comments made in good faith, even if they offend minorities.

AD

The Human Rights Commission says it is obliged to consider all complaints it receives. Liberals say the agency is being unfairly portrayed as trying to police public speech and it offers important protections at a time when anti-Muslim politicians are gaining strength.

The cartoonist at the center of the controversy, Bill Leak, has a history of pushing boundaries in the Australian, a nationally circulated right-wing newspaper. After publishing a cartoon of the prophet Muhammad in the wake of the Charlie Hebdo massacre in Paris last year he was urged by security agencies to move out of his Sydney home for his own safety.

His new house in a sleepy coastal town has three emergency buttons to summon help and a reinforced panic room. He uses an alias online.