I think we're on to something!Although, my solution was intended to treat '' as being equal to all multiples of '' to infinity.And while I admire your approach, I would argue that the magnitudes of 'Cute'can produce is not necessarily dependent on the value of, and in fact can very wildly:In these examples, one might posit that the cuteness (or magnitude of) is approximately equal, yet the second image clearly depicts what would appear to be the function(unless the effect of books is to be compounded by each additional book, making it insteadunless I'm mistaken).It occurs to me thatis, in fact, variable. What we aught to do is measureby herself determine her range ofemissions whenis not a factor. Only then can we properly calculate the effects ofon... Although thisassumeisn't variable as well.