IAEA Praises Sudan Nuclear Path, Then Takes No Q on It, Censorship Alliance

By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, April 27 -- Amid talk that the next UN Secretary General, and heads of UN system agencies, should not be picked by and beholden to only the most powerful countries, when International Atomic Energy Agency head Yukio Amano held a UN press conference on April 27 one expected such a question, even a simple one based of a Wikileaks released cable about how he got the job.



But the first question was set aside for UNCA, now the UN's Censorship Alliance, this time in the person of its Number One outright censor, blocking access to an anti-Press complaint he made tot he UN from Google's Search, here.



It's ironic, because by this logic Iran could censor the number reported about it that are leaked, including at the IAEA. But the IAEA press conference stumbled on, Iran top heavy with nary a question about India, much less African.



In fact, the IAEA's Africa Regional Officr Jin Kwang Lee was quoted this month that "Kenya and Uganda join their sub-Saharan Africa counter-parts, Ghana, Nigeria, Sudan and Niger while in North Africa - Egypt, Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia and Libya have taken notable steps."



Sudan? Nuclear? But the IAEA took no questions on this. Among other censorship-related reasons, which is why the new Free UN Coalition for Access opposes any set aside of first questions, particularly for an organization like UNCA whose Board members have tried to get independent Press thrown out of the UN. It's time to cast a skeptical and reforming eye more widely in the UN system. Watch this site.



Photo: #IAEA Jin Kwang Lee says #Sudan on nuclear pathway, but Amano & spox took no Africa Qs: #fail pic.twitter.com/1XHOWGhxFX — Inner City Press (@innercitypress) April 27, 2015



How should the next UN Secretary General be selected, to improve the Organization? That was the question on April 27, first in a 10 am press conference by the campaign called "1 for 7 Billion: Find the Best UN Leader."



Inner City Press asked the panel if, as happened last time, increase trade and aid funding by a candidates' country should at least be disclosed, if not prohibited. William Pace of WFM replied not only about countries spending hundreds of million of Euros, but also about the heads of international agencies using their posts to campaign.



Since UNDP's Helen Clark is known to have told associates and underlings she would like to be the next SG, Inner City Press asked the panel for comment. They were diplomatic, including on the UK, said to be a reformer on the SG post, having insisted it retain the Emergency Relief Coordinator positioon, albeit in the person of Stephen O'Brien and not Cameron's first nominee (and National Health Service destroyer) Andrew Lansley.



Natalie Samarasinghe of UNA-UK said the campaign around (well, against) Lansley was a positive step forward; she said that social media makes secret processes less possible. (But see the replacement at Yemen envoy of Jamal Benomar by a Mauritanian official who has not made public financial disclosure).



Yvonne Terlingen, now Senior Policy Adviser at WFM, also cited the OCHA process or campaign. WFM's Pace seemed to conflate the entire UN press corps with the UN Correspondents Association, a group that for example tried to censor Press coverage of how Under Secretary General Herve Ladsous got the job, then tried to get the Press thrown out.



The new Free UN Coalition for Access seeks to open the UN and these processes - watch this site.



Back on April 24 across the street from the UN at the International Peace Institution there was a panel about #NextSecGen moderated by former Indian Ambassador to the UN, and former Security Council member, Hardeep Singh Puri.

The post is said to be slated for the Eastern European Group, and the question and answer (or comment) portion was top-heavy with the Permanent Representatives of Croatia and Slovakia (also the chair of the Budget Committee) and the Deputy Permanent Representative of Estonia laying out of the positions of the ACT group, echoed by Costa Rica.

Inner City Press asked what about improving the transparency and place of merit in the selection of Under Secretaries General? Recently UK Prime Minister David Cameron's attempt to put Andrew Lansley of National Health Service infany atop the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs was defeated as reported in detail by Inner City Press, see credits in the Telegraph and UK Channel 4.

But, the position has stayed with the UK in the person of Stephen O'Brien (deemed better than the initial candidate by panelist Edward Mortimer). Should USG positions be “owned” by P3 countries, like France has owned UN Peacekeeping four times in a row (following a horse-trade for Kofi Annan becoming Secretary General) and the US has held Political Affairs twice in a row?

While Political Affairs USG Jeffrey Feltman came directly from the US State Department with the baggage that may carry, particularly in the Middle East, the most extreme example is Herve Ladsous of UN Peacekeeping, video here, Vine here.



When asked by Inner City Press about his history and qualification adopted the position of refusing all questions from Inner City Press and having his spokespeople, at least one of whom was present at IPI on April 24, go so far as to grab the UNTV microphone to avoid questions. Ladsous went so far as to say "I don't answer you Mister" at IPI itself, video here.



On the overall USG question Jean Krasno of the City College of New York favored “selecting candidates for these positions on merit rather than geographical. We want the highest quality people, serving in an impartial matter.”

Natalie Samarasinghe of the UN Association of the UK said, On the USG issue, we want an SG who has the freedom to make merit based appoints. At the moment as you have seen it is very unevenly applied. We need to condemn it. That pressure is very positive.”

Mortimer said he was among those who wrote to Ban Ki-moon (selected by the US and China, more than one attendee said, some citing John Bolton's book) about Cameron's first nominee for OCHA. He said that Press oversight is important. Puri said a good SG would pick good USGs. We'll have more on all this.



Photo: #ipinst panel on #NextSG moderated by frmr Indian PR Puri, so far 2 of 2 agree on USG reforms pic.twitter.com/0fMRrYXZMJ — Inner City Press (@innercitypress) April 24, 2015

Background: When Ban Ki-moon was selected as UN Secretary General in 2006 it was an untransparent process, with secret ballots in the Security Council.



On February 7, 2015, both processes were criticized by "The Elders." Appearing at the Munich Munich Security Conference, four Elders including Ban's predecessor Kofi Annan along with Gro Harlem Brundtland, Martti Ahtisaari and Graça Machel unveiled a UN reform plan.

Beyond Security Council reform, they specifically criticized Secretary General selection process for lack of transparency and choice, and suggested a single seven year term to avoid simply trying to get re-elected.

To replace Ban, the Elders say "we call on the General Assembly to insist that the Security Council recommend more than one candidate for appointment as the Secretary-General of the United Nations, after a timely, equitable and transparent search for the best qualified candidates, irrespective of gender or regional origin. We suggest that the next Secretary-General be appointed for a single, non-renewable term of seven years, in order to strengthen his or her independence and avoid the perception that he or she is guided by electoral concerns."

Inner City Press and the Free UN Coalition for Access, fighting for transparency including a Freedom of Information Act at the UN, agree and believe the Elders should have gone one level down, more timely, and criticized the ownership of Under Secretary General positions by P3 Security Council members like Peacekeeping and France's Herve Ladsous, and the process to replace Valerie Amos as OCHA, here (and above).

Even further down, t he under-performance of Team Ban, including for example UN Peacekeeping chief Herve Ladsous, has been enabled and concealed by what has become the UN's Censorship Alliance, formally the United Nations Correspondents Association. These forms of decay are not UNrelated.



Ban Ki-moon, meanwhile, is appearing in polls as running for president of his native South Korea in 2017. Inner City Press asked Ban's deputy spokesperson about it, who said Ban is “currently” focused on his current job. This has been repeated in South Korea, here. The UN is being used; the UN is in further decline; but there are moves afoot to stem the tide of decay. Watch this site.