Supervisor Scott Wiener has 3½ times as much cash on hand in the upcoming election for state Senate as his opponent, Jane Kim.

How that will play in the election is another matter. Wiener has consistently raised more money than Kim, but Kim narrowly defeated him in the June primary.

Maggie Muir, Wiener’s campaign manager, said the campaign is “exactly where we want to be.” She said Wiener was able to raise a lot of money despite voters’ being bombarded by donation requests from local, state and national candidates.

“It’s challenging to break through, so we’re feeling very comfortable about where we are financially right now,” she said.

Julie Edwards, a spokeswoman for Kim’s campaign, said she wasn’t worried by the money deficit.

“We believe the grassroots support is the path to victory in November, just like it was in June,” Edwards said.

Some of the biggest contributions to Wiener’s campaign come from construction trade groups, real estate interests and strip clubs, which chipped in $16,800, with contributions of $4,200 apiece from SAW Entertainment, the Penthouse Club, Gold Club and SFBSC Management.

The biggest contributors to Kim’s campaign came from labor unions representing teachers, nurses and service employees. She also received the maximum campaign donation — $4,200 — from investors and CEOs at technology companies, including Zendesk and Apple.

In San Francisco this fall, elections are being held in all odd-number supervisorial districts. The most expensive race is shaping up to be in District Five, a seat held by Board of Supervisors President London Breed.

Breed, whose district includes Hayes Valley, the Western Addition and the Inner Sunset, has $133,170 cash on hand. Her opponent, Dean Preston, has $90,798.

The race for District 11, which includes the Excelsior, the Outer Mission and the Ingleside, could also be close — at least looking at the money the candidates have raised. It is also looking to be an expensive one: Ahsha Safai has raised $99,458 to Kimberly Alvarenga’s $97,831.

Here are the numbers. The amount of money spent extends back to Jan. 1 and cash on hand as of June 30.

State Senate

Scott Wiener: Cash on hand: $627,818. Amount spent: $926,254.

Jane Kim: Cash on hand: $172,889. Amount spent: $763,467.

District 1

Sandra Fewer: Cash on hand: $75,490. Amount spent: $44,687.

Marjan Philhour: Cash on hand: $62,665. Amount spent: $76,984.

David Lee. Cash on hand: $29,791. Amount spent: $15,847.

District 3

Aaron Peskin: Cash on hand: $10,667. Amount spent: $27,052.

Wendy Chau: Cash on hand: $4,235. Amount spent: $14,007.

District 5

London Breed: Cash on hand: $133,170. Amount spent: $102,550.

Dean Preston. Cash on hand: $90,798. Amount spent: 98,694.

District 7

Joel Engardio: Cash on hand: $38,988. Amount spent: $8,544.

Benjamin Matranga: Cash on hand: $47,476. Amount spent: $27,434.

Norman Yee: Cash on hand: $77,302. Amount spent: $50,525.

District 9

Josh Arce: Cash on hand: $80,188. Amount spent: $76,302.

Hillary Ronen: Cash on hand: $137,884. Amount spent: $118,178

District 11

Ahsha Safai: Cash on hand: $99,458. Amount spent: $44,544.

Kimberly Alvarenga: Cash on hand: $97,831. Amount spent: $21,832.

— Emily Green

Re-emergence: When longtime political insider Bevan Dufty stepped down as the mayor’s homeless czar in December, nobody suspected he would sit on the sidelines for a long time. Indeed, he soon ran for and won a seat on the Democratic County Central Committee.

Now, he is making another move. He said Tuesday that he planned to run for BART Board of Directors, to fill the seat currently held by Tom Radulovich.

Dufty said Radulovich, who has held the seat since 1996, has told friends he plans not to run again.

Dufty has had a long career in city politics. He served two terms as supervisor from District Eight, worked as an adviser to then-Mayor Willie Brown and was chairman of the San Francisco County Transportation Authority.

“This is an opportunity for me to work in a field where I started my carer 40 years ago,” Dufty said.

Dufty will likely be running for the seat against Lisa Feldstein, a former city planning commissioner.

— Emily Green

Back at it: The supervisors were throwing insults at each other again on Tuesday, in a spat over putting measures on the November ballot.

It started when Supervisor Jane Kim asked her colleagues to put on the November ballot a measure aimed at preserving space for industrial use in the Mission and South of Market.

Supervisor Scott Wiener, her opponent in the upcoming race for state Senate, criticized Kim’s decision to put the measure on the ballot instead of getting it passed at the Board of Supervisors.

“Supervisor Kim clearly knows how to do legislation,” Wiener said. “We should be handling this here at the Board of Supervisors … in a consensus-driven, collaborative way.”

Good point, but Wiener similarly put on the ballot a measure that could be passed at the Board of Supervisors. His measure would require the Police Department to operate a neighborhood crime unit of at least 60 officers.

Kim retorted that her decision to go to the ballot shouldn’t be criticized “when other colleagues are doing the same exact thing.”

And, she said, if all the other supervisors took off the ballot measures that could be legislated at the board, she would follow their lead.

Fat chance. But, if they have a change of heart, the deadline for the supervisors to remove measures from the ballot is Friday.

— Emily Green

Email: cityinsider@sfchronicle.com, egreen@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @sfcityinsider, @emilytgreen