Prima.Vera Why not 4K@140Hz?

Prima.Vera Neh, the future is 8K@120Hz. Funny thing is this was tested almost 1 year ago. Now all we need is the connector for the video card --> TV/monitor



armdevices.net/2014/09/19/8k-120hz-demo-by-nhk-japan/

I'm not sure if a professional would benefit from 144 Hz but as far as entertainment goes there will be very little offerings for 4K because of the bandwidth required. For example I pay extra for HD TV but I only get a few channels in 1080p. Most are 720p or 1080i. I have been told that this is because of lack of bandwidth by Comcast. Maybe they are lying but it's the same if I switch to the other cable provider here. Downloading a 4K movie would take most people a long time.For gaming there is no combination of GPUs that can handle 4K @ 144 Hz and probably no CPU for a while that could feed the GPUs fast enough. Maybe that will improve with DX12. We'll see.As far as 8K goes supposedly LG outed Apple releasing an 8K iMac later this year. The story is that the image on the screen will be lifelike which I guess has it's appeal to professionals but not for entertainment.I don't see 8K movies and cable as a reality until serious effort is put into making the broadband bandwidth necessary practical and affordable. Bear in mind that an 8K TV would have the same number of pixels as a 16 Full HD TVs.For gaming at 8K @ 120 Hz that is a looooong way off imo. We will probably see a 3 way high end SLI/Crossfire setup that could handle that one day but what CPU could feed those GPUs fast enough?Edit: I went and looked at some reviews and the CPU side of things should not be a problem for most games even with games getting more demanding. Some RTS and open-world games probably will have issues though at 120/144 FPS.