“Given such a definition of what is relevant under our laws on evidence, it is easy to see that questions that tend to establish the degree of intimacy such as knowledge of the favorite food of one party by the other, awareness of an anniversary or even the predilection for sili (chilli) all tend to establish the limits of such intimacy, which are all legitimate jumping board questions to the logical implication that such intimacy translates to power over the decision making powers of the parties in relation to [the] drug trade,” said Belaro.