Yet Another E-voting Machine Vulnerability Found

from the because-of-course dept

Hacking voting machines: not that difficult. Hiding a secret deviation in votes from after-the-fact statistical analysis: nearly impossible. — Edward Snowden (@Snowden) November 7, 2016

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community. Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis. While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

We've been talking about the ridiculousness of e-voting machines for well over a decade . If a machine doesn't include a paper trail for backup, it's suspect. That's been the case since e-voting machines have been on the market, and many of us have been pointing this out all along. And the big e-voting companies have a long history of not really caring , even as their machines are shown to be vulnerable in a variety of ways . So it come as little to no surprise to find out that security firm Cylance has announced that it's found yet another set of e-voting vulnerabilities in the Sequoia AVC Edge Mk1 voting machine. Sequoia especially has a long history of buggy, faulty machines.Of course, with all the talk of "rigged" voting this year, the fact that some machines are hackable is. Mainly because it just enables conspiracy theory talk to seem much more believable. It remains true (for somewhat ridiculous reasons) that while these vulnerabilities do exist, a widespread hack would be quite difficult . The real problem is at the margin, where low level vote changing could occur. As Ed Snowden rightly notes , the hacking may not be difficult, but using that to rig an election is much more difficult, and would almost certainly be caught.That said, this remains ridiculous. Even the appearance ofvote hacking is a problem in actually getting the public to trust the results of an election. I can pretty much guarantee that no matter who wins tomorrow, someone will allege e-voting machine hacking, and point to this (or perhaps other) vulnerability disclosures in the days leading up to the election. And that's bad. For over a decade we've been sounding the alarm that it's ridiculous to use such electronic voting machines, and it would be a damn good idea to fix things . Would have been nice if someone listened.

Filed Under: e-voting, evoting, paper trail, vote rigging, vulnerability

Companies: sequoia