doombrigade:

doombrigade: Cisphobia sucks. Transphobia sucks. Heterophobia sucks. Homophobia sucks. Biphobia sucks. Queerphobia sucks. Racism against white people sucks. Racism against black people sucks. Racism against anybody sucks. Sexism against men sucks. Sexism against women sucks. Hating on… http://0llie-0llie.tumblr.com/post/121477646929/takashi0-scythera-fae-takashi0#notes Fuck you and your get educated bullshit.

breakdown of every link because you ain’t learned shit apparently so i’m gonna play teacher for a bit

A: Cisphobia:

literally every screenshot in the link provided is either missing a URL or is a confirmed/suspected troll blog. i can’t believe i even have to address this, but if you see a blog doing this shit, tagging a bunch, and listing themselves as vague shit (e.g; “a nonbinary”) and using neo-pronouns or nounself pronouns, they’re either a child or an anti-sj troll blog 99% of the time. a child will probably have a deactivated URL after being harassed for their asinine behavior. now u kno.

B: Heterophobia:

the same link was provided for heterophobia as cisphobia which, unsurprisingly, contains no actual examples of heterophobia. moving on.

C: “Racism” against white people:



white ppl not being allowed to own land in zimbabwe anymore: WELL THEY FUCKING CAME OVER AND COLONIZED IT, SUBJUGATED THE LOCALS, BOO FUCKING HOO sorry lmao but british settlers shouldn’t have been there in the first fucking place and profiting off of the locals–turning people who were actually living there into “tenants” like jfc how conceited do you have to be. anyway here’s a link. also, does the term “apartheid” mean anything to you? it should.



“no gaijin allowed” (in japan): the link provided actually explains that it’s not really a problem and also never specifies anti-white racism, just basic xenophobia. good going. the second link about a foreign student being denied housing, again, basic xenophobia.



racism in asia: the link provided clearly states “South Korean schools have been criticized for hiring only white teachers who apply to teach English, because Koreans regard fair skin color as representative of “American” or “English”-ness.”, and in the Philippines, “[u]p to the present-day, descendants of White colonizers of the country still obtain a positive treatment, while in the entertainment industry, actors/actresses are mostly of part-White descent”, so the only times white people are mentioned there is racism IN THEIR FAVOR. STILL NO RACISM AGAINST WHITE PEOPLE. WOW.



“racism against Irish”: from the link provided, dated 1997, “Today the Irish in America are no longer the victims of discrimination.” Of note, discrimination against Irish people is still an issue (though not in the US), but as explained in the second link it has always been perpetuated by more white people so idk why you thought either of those were gonna prove a point lmao.



racism in india: the link states aT THE VERY BEGINNING that perceptions are skewed favorably toward light-skinned people jfc



the second link about zimbabwe: see above. I mean, yes, this is fucking horrifying. however, in this case, it’s more like reaping what you sow. tbh these people are still at the beginning of a revolution: apartheid just ended in 1994, and there is no systematic disadvantage for white people instilled in government or social structures. unsurprisingly, though, people are still mad about all the bs white people caused; this doesn’t qualify as racism but it does qualify as discrimination. would fit better in section D, since it’s p much the only thing that counts as black-on-white hate crime



third link about zimbabwe: you are aware that the Daily Mail is a fucking TABLOID MAGAZINE, right?? like. holy shit. might as well source the national enquirer.



fourth link about zimbabwe/south africa: eyyyyy see the same shit i talked about in C6. discrimination, not racism.



D: black-on-white hate crimes:



san gennaro festival: uh a bunch of kids being jackasses isn’t a hate crime, and as there are no racial slurs actually listed it’s hard to say what’s going on here. other articles on the subject don’t support the one provided at all (and tbh, if Fox News isn’t pointing out their ethnicity, the troublemakers were probably white), and the one provided shows clear journalistic bias.



the second link provides zero context so unable to determine if actually a hate crime. however, that link also lists “Pine Ridge Indian Reservation, SD– A White man is dragged to his death by Indians. Federal officials hesitate to call it a “hate crime”. This was not investigated as a hate crime.” so its credibility is down the shitter eNTIRELY. if i need to explain why this is the case, there’s no helping you



the knockout game is not racially motivated and this is not a hate crime



same shitty biased site as example #1 and i know that incident already from the ferguson riots. definitely not a hate crime.



404 error, can’t get anything else on it.



misogyny, not a racially-motivated hate crime

E: sexism against men (misandry): be warned that for simplification purposes that this section will be very cissexist

misleading statistics, as this sample is specifically referring to people in relationships being coerced (and i feel it important to point out that this is likely a result of men being codified as “always willing”, and that hypermasculinity is defined and enforced by men.)



more misleading statistics: the assault rates by both men and women were similar, and the victims were mixed genders so there’s no evidence of misandry here. wow, it’s almost as if assholes in a position of power will act on their assholery.



actually states that, percentage-wise, male staff were more likely to abuse female inmates than vice-versa. all this article proves is that violence was more likely to be heterosexual in nature.



way to cherry-pick. “Youth of any gender were still most likely to be exploited by males (70%), but half (50%) of sexually exploited youth who answered the questions reported that they had exchanged sex for money or goods with females.” how is this misandry, anyway?



every single example afterward: radfems are fucking awful, yeah. and generally transphobic shitty humans. however, sexism, like racism, is prejudice+power, and the reality is that women, esp. radfems, do not have the power to enforce anything against men on a social scale.

also: the reason men aren’t taken seriously or helped when attacked by women, sexually or no, is because of hypermasculinity. see E1.

none of this actually constitutes sexism, as the systems that cause these disadvantages for men were created and are perpetuated by men. that’s kinda the key thing here.



TL;DR do your research

(via doombrigade)