Paul Singer

USA TODAY

So far this election cycle, groups opposing Donald Trump have spent just over $30 million on advertising to try to stop his renegade presidential campaign, a figure that far dwarfs the opposition any other candidate has faced.

Of course, all that vitriol doesn't seem to be helping much, as Trump cleaned up in Tuesday's New York primary and looks well-positioned to do the same next week in five "Amtrak Corridor" states. The graphic below built by our partners at Graphiq shows the dramatic comparison to the pro-Trump advertising (basically bupkis) and the anti-Trump spending (yuuuuuge).

Weeks after dropping out of the race, Marco Rubio still holds second place for negative advertising, with opposition groups spending 8.7 million against him while he was still running his campaign.That tops even Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton, who has been on the receiving end of just over 7 million in negative advertising from third parties.

This graphic compiles information reported to the Federal Election Commission by independent groups (not candidates).