The name NIPS became a flashpoint in the debate over how to make AI more inclusive earlier this year after complaints about sexist behavior at the conference, which takes place each December. A blog post about an on-stage remark about sexual harassment at last year’s conference led to investigations into accusations of physical harassment by Google’s director of statistics research Steven Scott, and University of Minnesota professor Brad Carlin. Both subsequently left their their jobs.

That incident helped inspire an open letter in March from 112 Johns Hopkins University faculty asking the NIPS board to seek a name less “vulnerable to sexual puns.” In April the board said it would consider alternatives, and in August it surveyed attendees from the past five years on crowdsourced options including SNIPS or ICOLS.

Monday, the board announced that it would not be changing the name after all, prompting the new round of protests. “The poll itself did not yield a clear consensus on a name change or a well-regarded alternative name,” a board statement said. Of the 2,270 respondents to the poll, 294 identified themselves as female. Overall, roughly 30 percent of respondents wanted to change the name; among those who identified as female, the proportion was 44 percent. In a statement on Friday, Terrence Sejnowski, president of the NIPS board and a professor at the Salk Institute, said the group had not ruled out reconsidering the name at some point in the future. "However the board wants to focus on taking substantive actions to make the conference more inclusive, and it welcomes suggestions for other actions," he said.1

Elana Fertig, an associate professor at Hopkins, can take some credit for forcing the NIPS board to consider the issue. She helped organize the Hopkins letter asking for the name change, after a grad student confided that she wanted to attend NIPS, but was concerned about the atmosphere there for women.

In an interview Thursday, Fertig questioned the conference board’s decision to survey only past attendees of the event. Surveying people who had been going to NIPS already isn’t a good way to help those who feel excluded from the community, she says.

Fertig and others unhappy with the name say there has been other progress in making NIPS and the wider field more inclusive. After last year’s conference, University of Maryland professor Hal Daumé pledged to boycott the event if it didn’t clean up its act. This year he’s one of two new “diversity and inclusion” chairs on the organizing committee, which has introduced a detailed new code of conduct, and support for childcare. “We’ve made some positive steps this year although there are a bunch more to go,” says Katherine Heller, a Duke professor who is the second diversity and inclusion chair, and has also spoken out about sexual harassment in the field. She and Daumé both say they “care a lot” about the name of the conference, but declined to elaborate.

Anandkumar hopes she and her fellow protestors can convince the NIPS board to reconsider its decision to let the current acronym stand, and begin a broader program of consultation. “It reflects on the deeper issues,” she says. “If we can’t resolve even a simple name change how can we deal with the more serious ones?”

Others who wish the acronym had been retired are doubtful the board will change course in the short term. “Hopefully we’ll revisit this at another time,” says Allison Chaney, a postdoctoral researcher at Princeton, who will present work at this year’s NIPS conference, which takes place in Montreal in December. “For now we can make the best efforts we can to make NIPS and other machine learning conferences as inclusive as possible.”

Fertig at Johns Hopkins says there’s plenty else to do. Her experience in biological research suggests that machine learning lags other areas of science in welcoming women and other groups that have historically found it hard to advance in science and technology. “The conversations there are just leaps and bounds beyond the conversations we’re having in machine learning,” she says.

1 UPDATED, Oct. 26, 1PM ET: This article has been updated to include comment from Terrence Sejnowski, president of the NIPS board.

More Great WIRED Stories