Article content

Everybody has a right to their opinion, right? Except when it infringes on the self-indulgence (Get used to this word. I’ll use it like salt) of those who disagree. To be precise, when the other person is inconvenienced.

Reference: West Island Gazette article by Kathryn Greenaway; Dorval backtracks after tempers flare over proposed dangerous dog bylaw; Sept. 24.

We apologize, but this video has failed to load.

tap here to see other videos from our team. Try refreshing your browser, or Schukov: Dorval had the proposed dangerous dog bylaw right the first time Back to video

So some people who own one of the following — pit bull, Rottweiler, German shepherd, bulldog, mastiff, husky, Labrador retriever, boxer, doberman, chow chow — went hairy all over Dorval city council over the proposed breed specific legislation (BSL).

Doesn’t matter these breeds are capable of taking your face off, based on statistical data (God forbid.) The draft was not based on imagination but research. Noooooooo. People who own these breeds are irate why? Forget the dog part. It’s because a self-indulgent person wants what they want, and doesn’t give a hoot about how it may affect others.