The news that a bare majority of voters, in one opinion poll, want to see Brexit delivered "by all means possible”, including suspending parliament, proved only one thing – how precarious parliamentary democracy now is.

The respondents, as ever, were not offered any guidance as to what a no-deal Brexit might mean, though I admit there’s a lot of public discussion about that now. It’s also significant that when it was pointed out it might mean the end of the Union, and Scottish independence too, many changed their mind.

We don’t run the country on opinion polls. They are useful, of course, but the fallacy of populism and the current tyranny of the “17.4 million want this” argument are part of the same phenomenon: that you take one vote, referendum or poll on a matter, and that marks the end of any debate or deliberation. People who dissent from this view are called anti democratic, elitist or "enemies of the people".

But they are no such thing. This latest ComRes poll for The Telegraph does not, in itself, give anyone a mandate for a no-deal Brexit. Neither, as a matter of fact, did the narrow Leave majority back in 2016. Even if some people thought, and knew, it would mean leaving the European Union without a deal in place, that cannot have accounted for all Leave voters.

I know this because I was one of the slim majority of British people who did vote to Leave – and I certainly did not expect, nor did I desire, a no-deal Brexit.

So where does this leave us? Given that parliament is unable to take on the role it needs to, to decide things through the traditional representative deliberative methods that have served us well until now, then the question does need to be put to the people once again. A Final Say referendum does mean exactly that. If we're heading for no deal, then parliament and the people need to be given the vote on that. And if they vote for it, fine; it’s game over.

The front pages on what would have been Brexit Day Show all 12 1 /12 The front pages on what would have been Brexit Day The front pages on what would have been Brexit Day March 29 2019 - The original date for Britain's departure from the EU, what do the newspapers have to say about it? The front pages on what would have been Brexit Day Daily Express The Daily Express focuses on the fact that today was the original day for Britain's departure from the EU The front pages on what would have been Brexit Day Daily Mail The Daily Mail warns MPs that they have "one last chance" to back the Prime Minister's Brexit deal The front pages on what would have been Brexit Day The Independent The Independent Daily Edition reports that the Prime Minister is gambling as she holds a vote today on the withdrawal agreement The front pages on what would have been Brexit Day The Sun The Sun reports that the Prime Minister last night sought to convince DUP leader Arlene Foster to back her deal The front pages on what would have been Brexit Day The Guardian The Guardian reports that some ministers want the Prime Minister to step down now, while Michael Gove becomes the favourite at the bookies to replace her The front pages on what would have been Brexit Day The i The i reports that Boris Johnson is preparing his leadership bid for when the Prime Minister resigns The front pages on what would have been Brexit Day The Times The Times reports that Brexit may be delayed for a further year The front pages on what would have been Brexit Day The Daily Telegraph The Daily Telegraph reports that the Prime Minister is making a "desperate final plea" to pass her Brexit deal through the house of commons The front pages on what would have been Brexit Day Financial Times The Financial Times reports on the Brexit Betrayal march that will reach London today after setting off from Sunderland with the intention of reaching London on Brexit day The front pages on what would have been Brexit Day Daily Mirror The Daily Mirror reports on the Prime Minister's difficulty passing her deal through the commons The front pages on what would have been Brexit Day Daily Star The Daily Star calls on its readers to shut up about Brexit

A “politicians versus the people” general election is a toxic idea. After all Boris Johnson, Sajid Javid, Michael Gove are politicians, are they not? To borrow a phrase, you can’t choose which politicians you respect the legitimacy of.

Ridiculing and despising politicians is easy, and always has been. They’re "all in it for themselves", they're "out of touch", they're expenses fiddling randy hypocrites. Well, maybe – but then that’s democracy, and it’s better than all the other systems.

Denigrating the democratic political class is shadowing into a fascistic contempt for parliamentary democracy, as if all our lives could be delegated to a strong man plus the occasional opinion poll or plebiscite.

It’s authoritarian populism. And it's not the Brexit I voted for.