Thanks for joining me!

The first half of this document details just some of the injustices and deceits perpetrated by women against men. It’s a far from exhaustive list.

The second half proposes a strategy by which men can address these issues to level the playing field.

What prompted me to write this?

In a word #MeToo. This movement has been just one more example of the disgusting way in which women take the actions of a small minority of men and use it to denigrate all men with the aim of further eroding what few rights we have left whilst taking yet more rights and privileges for themselves, all the while casually ignoring the fact that with rights come responsibilities, which as I will demonstrate women have utterly failed to meet.

The spectacle of has been actresses and celebrities crawling out from under their rocks to jump on the band wagon and grab just a few more minutes in the spotlight no matter what the cost to anyone else is nothing short of disgusting. Then the band wagon feminists taking up the call and destroying the reputation of random men simply because they can is a step too far. Yes there are men in the world who’s behaviour towards women ranges form the unacceptable to the obnoxious and criminal, but the same can be said of some women and their behaviour towards men. In the case of both genders they are a small minority and there are due processes to deal with them. But women have all jumped on the social media band wagon to do what women do best, seek advantage. What we are now seeing is the creation of a situation in which women can throw accusations at any man they so choose and they are believed without question. The man is guilty unless he can prove otherwise and even if he is found to be completely innocent his life and reputation are destroyed because women will simply counter that he got away with it, or worse still that “well it doesn’t matter because so many other men get away with it”. They do not care if the man accused actually did it as long as a man, any man, pays a price. We are allowing women to destroy the foundations of society and to corrupt the due process of law and justice for their own egotistical, selfish, short sighted agenda. The time has now come for men to stand tall, shoulder to shoulder, as brothers, and push back this morally bankrupt horde and restore balance and fairness to society. The time has come for men to take back control and take the necessary steps to ensure that women are held accountable for their actions too.

To fail to take action now is to condemn this generation and future generations of men and boys to a continuation of the discrimination and abuse they are now subjected to on a daily basis and will simply encourage women to further marginalise men to the detriment of society. Today it is #MeToo, if we fail to make a stand now, tomorrow it will be #IWantAUnicorn with the strap line “because of the misogynistic patriarchy I can’t have one”

What follows is based upon the situation in the UK. However, it is not unreasonable to assume that the percentage statistics are likely to be broadly similar in most western, industrialised societies in Europe, USA and Australia to name a few.

The proposed courses of action relate to the legal position in the UK. If you live outside the UK you must check the legality of these proposals as they apply to you in your country of residence and in the USA in terms of both federal and state law.

The Problem

Women lie, women cheat, women treat men with contempt. Basically women, particularly younger women no longer have any respect for men and see them as little more than a meal ticket.

Women, children and relationships

Research by the Liverpool John Moores University suggests that 4% of fathers in the UK are raising another man’s child but do not know it. Their wives or partners, the one person they have always been told they can trust without question has not only been unfaithful but has also allowed themselves to become pregnant by another man and then told their husband or partner that he is the father and in doing so denied him his reproductive rights and defrauded him of his resources in order to pay for another man’s child. To put 4% into prospective this equates to 600,000 men in the UK who are being deceived in this way.

Given the sensitive nature of the issue and the obvious difficulty in establishing accurate data, how reliable is this figure?

A survey by yougov.com revealed that 8% of fathers in the UK, 1.2M men, had doubts about the paternity of their child. Why would any man give a response like that if he didn’t have genuine doubts?

Data on paternity testing at a Manchester based DNA lab indicates that 50% of the tests that are carried out show that the man who was told he was the father was not in fact the biological father.

Given that these test are typically only carried out where there is doubt about paternity the figure of 4% would appear to be credible. To put it bluntly 600,000 women in the UK have committed paternity fraud by being unfaithful to their husbands or partners, becoming pregnant as a result and have then deceived their husbands or partners by telling them that they are the father, and women apparently don’t think that there is anything wrong with this.

Given the wide variety of readily available contraceptives in the UK and indeed most western societies one has to ask how so many of these women find themselves “unintentionally” pregnant. The only logical conclusion is that they are only concerned with what they want. They have no qualms about treating the man they have married or chosen as their life partner with complete and utter contempt. He is just a meal ticket, a pay pig.

This raises another equally serious question. If 600,000 women are committing paternity fraud, how many more have had unprotected sex with someone other than their husband or partner and used emergency contraception (the morning after pill) or worse still not even bothered with that, discovered that they are pregnant and had abortions? Simply to protect their position and relationship, to preserve their free ride from the consequences of their irresponsible behaviour?

If this many women are having unprotected sex with someone other than their husbands or partners, how many men are unknowingly being put at risk of contracting a sexually transmitted disease including HIV by these women?

Women are all too quick to call out men for not taking responsibility for their actions but are quite happy to put other peoples health, happiness and well being at risk to avoid taking responsibility for theirs. Lets be absolutely clear about this, these women are willing to perpetrate the most heinous deception on the 2 people who should be able to trust them unquestioningly (or so women claim), namely their partners and their children. They are willing to lie to their partners for their entire marriage and their children for their entire lives from the day they are born to the day their mothers die in order to satisfy their own selfish wants.

Many so called social scientist and ethicists have tried to argue that there is more to fatherhood than genetics and that male focus on genetics is misplaced. However, if a woman is sent home from a maternity hospital with the wrong baby, a thankfully rare occurrence, it is front page news. If 600,000 women had been deceived in this way it would be considered an outrage, immediate action would be demanded and would no doubt be forthcoming from the government.

These so called experts point to the thousands of children raised by step fathers or men who’s partners conceive by in-vitro fertilisation using donated sperm as examples to support their assertion, whilst casually ignoring the concept of consent. A step father knows that the children are someone else’s but consents to becoming a father figure from a position of knowledge, it is informed consent. Furthermore there are no legal consequences for a step father because he is not named on the register of births or the birth certificate as the father. The husbands or partners of women who conceive using IVF and donated sperm know what they are entering into and not only agree to follow this course of action, but are also happy to be named on the birth certificate. But in cases of paternity fraud the woman has lied and therefore there is no consent. The man is being deceived and denied his reproductive rights and bled of his resources thereby reducing the chances that he will ever have a child of his own.

When it comes to reproductive rights women are morally and ethically bankrupt and the ethicists and social scientists who argue that male concern with paternity is misplaced, that father hood is about more than genetics are little more than snake oil salesmen trying to justify the unjustifiable, namely the betrayal and deceit perpetrated by these women. If genetics is so unimportant, is it ethically or morally right that the National Health Service in the UK spends £400M per annum providing infertility treatment to childless couples so that the woman can have her own child when there are children’s homes the length and breadth of the country full of children hoping that someone will adopt them and give them the family life they so desperately want and need, or that people are required to wait for for medical treatments that could dramatically improve their quality of life so that these women can give birth to their own child?

A survey of women’s attitudes carried out for a popular UK women’s magazine called Thats Life revealed some truly shocking statistics about the sheer scale of the problem facing men with regards deceit by women in their reproductive strategy.

50% of the women polled stated that if they got pregnant by someone other than their husband or partner they would lie and tell their husband or partner that he was the father.

42% of women said that they would lie about contraception in order to get pregnant without their partners agreement or consent.

These are women who will look their husbands or partners in the eye and tell them that they love them!

Women are selfish, self centred and irresponsible. They are only interested in what they perceive to be in their own best interest over all other considerations. They have acquired such an inflated sense of entitlement to have what ever they want that they now view having a child as their right but do not feel the need the extend that right to their husbands or partners. Apparently men do not have the right to father their own children.

Mis-attributed paternity (paternity fraud) can have devastating consequences on so many people and not just the child and the man who have both been lied to. The child’s health could be at risk if the biological father had a genetic disorder that could be passed to the child. Without this information that child might not get the necessary preventative medical care to ensure the best potential outcome for its well being. The devastating impact on the child and the rest of the family if it is discovered later in life. The impact on the mental health of the child and the deceived man, and what about the man’s extended family? Grandparents, uncles and aunts who suddenly find that they are not. All this, because a woman was not willing to take responsibility for her actions, and yet women are all too quick to call out men for not taking responsibility for theirs. The notion that women put their children’s interests above their own is a myth that has been perpetuated by women for financial gain and to gain advantage over men through the legal system and the family courts, to the detriment of their children and those children’s fathers.

To make matters worse for men, the use of genetic testing is becoming increasingly common place in general medicine to identify pre dispositions to a number of diseases to enable preventative medical intervention and to tailor treatments to specific patient needs. These test also make the medical professionals involved aware of paternity status. The medical professions current policy with regards the disclosure of this information is that they do not. As the use of genetic testing in general healthcare becomes more prevalent, men are going to realise that this information is being withheld from them. This can do nothing other than create mistrust between men and the medical profession. Healthcare outcomes for men are bad enough as things stand and now the actions of these women and the complicity of the medical profession is creating a situation in which men will feel that they cannot trust the medical profession and that can only make this situation worse. Yet one more area in which men will become marginalised to protect the interests of women under the guise of protecting the interests of children.

Relationship breakdown

Relate, a marriage and relationship guidance charity in the UK conducted a survey which revealed that 1 in 3 separated mothers thought that they should have sole right to make decisions about their children’s lives – more than double the number of separated men who thought single parents should have sole say. This should not come as a surprise to anyone. Women view children as being theirs and the fathers as being a biologically necessary inconvenience with a bank account. When men talk about their children they refer to them as “our children” when women talk about children they refer to them as “my children”.

A report published by the Centre for Social Justice in 2013 linked fatherless families to higher rates of teenage crime and pregnancy, as well as social disadvantage, but apparently this is no reason for women to accept the need for the father’s involvement in the child’s life after a separation or divorce. Yet another example of women’s irresponsible, self centred, self obsessed desire to have what they want irrespective of the harm it does to anyone else including their own children. A woman’s view is very much she doesn’t want the father to have anything to do with her child, just go away but keep sending the money.

Despite this statistic and the evidence to back it up, the family courts, social services and the government still take the view that women should have residential custody of any children following a divorce and fathers are left with paltry, hard won visitation rights which these women then try to frustrate using tactics and strategies that include making false accusations of domestic abuse against her or worse still the child. Even if these are proved to be baseless the man’s standing in the community is tarnished forever, (Guess where #MeToo got the tactic from). She still gets custody of the children and no action is taken against the woman for making these false accusations. However the stigma of the accusations against the man can follow him for the rest of his life because people will always think that there is no smoke without fire, that the authorities just couldn’t prove it. It is rare indeed for a man to be granted custody of his children. Basically unless the mother is regularly found lying in the gutter, with an empty gin bottle in one hand and a syringe containing the remnants of her last heroine fix in the other, a man has almost no chance of being awarded custody by the courts and even in these circumstances the courts are just as likely to recommend additional support from social services for the mother to enable her to keep the children at all costs, including the damage to the child’s prospects and the financial cost to taxpayer.

Women are hypocrites

Every year women spent hundreds, sometimes thousands of pounds on make up, beauty products, plastic surgery, all to make themselves more attractive. They wear low cut tops and short skirts, High heeled shoes which they then claim hurt their feet and make their legs ache. Why do they do all this. They do it to make themselves look more attractive, to draw attention to themselves. At its most basic these things have only one real function and that is to attract men. But god help you if you compliment her or look at her. If you are the one she wants to attract you might be OK but if you are not then you are committing an act of sexual harassment by looking at or complimenting her. Apparently your inability to read her mind and figure out who she is trying to attract, now means that you should be put on the sex offenders register.

Even in everyday situations women have lost the plot with regards to interacting with men. Apparently they no longer have to say NO, they can give a few subtle visual clues and your failure to pick up on these is enough for them to level a charge of sexual assault or worse. And to cap it all off it appears that women can now wake up the morning after a consensual sexual encounter, regret what she has done and now feels empowered to withdraw consent after a sexual encounter and hurl accusations of sexual assault or rape. Don’t believe me? just look at what happened to Aziz Ansari.

If it is left to women the human race will become extinct because they have created an environment in which men now feel approaching a woman carries more risk than its worth and women wont approach men because their delicate little egos can’t handle being rejected.

With regards the work place women have have turned it into a battleground where they are quite happy to flirt with the boss to get what they want, but woe betide anyone who flirts with them, after all what can they get from that. They will use their sexuality to get what they want one minute and play the poor oppressed woman the next to throw around aligation’s of inappropriate conduct to gain advantage, safe in the knowledge that they will be believed without question, thereby destroying a man’s career and reputation. This is what women mean by empowerment, the power to destroy men’s lives.

Discrimination in the legal system

Discrimination against men by the judiciary runs through its veins. \leaving the family courts aside, in general terms with regards the justice system, mothers convicted of crimes are treated far more leniently than fathers in terms of general criminal activity and are far more likely to receive non custodial sentences than men for the same crime. Just one more area where women are allowed to wave the “think of the children” card and get a free pass.

Betrayal of Trust

Generally speaking when people start talking about betrayal of trust within a relationship the first thing, usually the only thing that comes to mind is infidelity. Women however take betrayal of trust well beyond that. Women generally want you to share everything with them, but think carefully before you do. Ask yourself how you feel about her mother, her sisters, her girlfriends, their friends, uncle Tom Cobley and all knowing about it. Because she will tell them all, and given their propensity to want to share the news quickly she has no qualms about doing it on social media which raises the risk that she might inadvertently share it with the world. If you told your friends about her gynaecological problem she would hit the roof. Men get this and don’t tell anyone. Women however do not see that there is anything wrong with telling her sisters, her mother and her friends about your prostate problem of any other medical issue that you might not want shared. Worse still if she ever cheats on you with another man she will tell him too because she has formed an emotional bond with him so he is someone she can share her personal intimate knowledge with. I suspect that women don’t see this as a betrayal because they simply don’t stop to consider how you would feel about her telling all of these people, but even if that is the case it shows how little consideration women give men. Their need to share is paramount, Just one more thing men are supposed to simply accept, which should come as no surprise given how selfish, self centred and inconsiderate of men’s feelings women have become.

Advice: Choose the things that you share with her and the things you close her out of carefully. If there are issues of any sort that you need to deal with that you don’t want all and sundry to know about, be they medical or otherwise, tell her you have to go on a business trip or a training course for work and that you will be away for a couple of days, go and get it sorted out and don’t tell her.

WHAT CAN MEN DO?

Men of the 21st century, stand shoulder to shoulder and declare ENOUGH IS ENOUGH; NO MORE; take control out of the hands of women, claim back your dignity and your rightful place in society and the family.

It will not be easy. The enemy forces massed against us are considerable. In population terms women enjoy a small advantage in numbers but massed behind them are the forces of government and its associated agencies, the judiciary and much of the media, but as Sun Tzu demonstrates in the Art of War the apparent power of those forces can undermined or turned against them and used to our advantage.

Women have now been given rights and privileges over and above any that men have and they have abused that power and wielded those rights and privileges like a knife, to marginalise and disempower men, but we still have 5 things in our favour. The differences between male and female biology, our ability to take control of reproduction out of the hands of women, male emotional strength versus the female inability to control emotion, money and last but not least science.

The time has come to deny women the things that they, the government and the judiciary unfairly see as their rights, children on their terms and access to your money and resources without having to put anything back into the relationship. It is time to make women live up to their side of the bargain.

THE BATTLEFIELD – HOME FRONT

Relationships and Progeny

Biology

Women see their role in human reproduction as giving them a significant advantage over men. For centuries they have used the fact that only they know who the father of their child really is to their advantage. Men must just take their word for it. 600,000 men and counting in the UK have, as a result, been deprived of their reproductive rights. But, there are weaknesses to their strategy which men can exploit to take back control.

Her biological clock is the first weapon in men’s arsenal. Women have a biological need to have at least one child. It drives much of what they do and as they get older the need to fulfil this role becomes more urgent. Tic tock, tic tock it’s called her biological clock.

Biologically, men remain fertile to a much later stage in their lives than women. As women get older the risks associated with pregnancy and child birth increase, their fertility and likelihood of getting pregnant decreases then disappears altogether following the menopause, usually in their forties although it can occur earlier. Consequently as women enter their thirties, if they have not yet had children they become more anxious where as men still have time.

The wonders of science and DNA means that it is now possible to determine whether a child really is yours when it is born.

From a strategic stand point men can and must take control of reproduction out of the hands of women to ensure that any children their partners give birth to are theirs.

At a tactical level this can be achieved by attacking the weak points in women’s reproductive strategy.

Using her biological clock to your advantage

Do not rush to settle down and start a family. A man under the age of 30 should have a life plan and be enjoying life, building a career and starting to accumulate resources. Save some money, start investing and building resources so that when YOU decide to start a family you can provide for it. Explore the world while you are free to do so. Enjoy the company of women but do not commit to one. In any sexual relationships take control of contraception, always use condoms and never, ever, rely on what a woman tells you about her contraceptive status. Remember 42% of women will lie about their contraceptive status to get pregnant without your consent and in doing so make you financially liable and potentially trapped. You will never be able to prove she lied about her contraceptive status and even if you can you are still the biological father of that child and will be held financially liable for it.

Do not be ashamed or embarrassed to pay for sex if you are not in a sexual relationship. It is not illegal to pay for sex in the UK. Apart from anything else, if you are paying for it directly as a service then you are more likely to get the sex you want when you want it and you don’t have to wine and dine them first. In a relationship you are still paying for it, indirectly, but the sex you get is the sex she can be bothered to give you when she can be bothered to have sex at all.

When you hit 30, that is the time to begin looking for your life partner, the woman you want to live with and raise a family with. The target is a woman in her mid twenties, 24 to 28 years old, who does not already have children and who is gainfully employed and able to pay her own way. Try to avoid university educated women, they will have been exposed to the rampant, feminist, men are to blame for everything propaganda that is peddled within the higher education system and as such are totally unsuitable as a life partner. Under no circumstances should you consider a divorced woman, especially one with a ready made family. She has no real interest in having your children, she already has her children and someone else has already kicked her to the curb. To her you are just a meal ticket. Always remember, there are more women than men, its a buyers market so shop around, you dont have to settle quite as much as they do.

Use your fertile longevity to your advantage

Women need sperm to get pregnant and thereby fulfil the role of motherhood. The source of that is men, either directly from a man through sexual intercourse or indirectly from a sperm bank via a fertility clinic.

The use of donated sperm comes with 2 problems for women. Firstly it is expensive. The well off, successful career women can afford the medical costs and the costs associated with raising a child on her own. Good luck to her. For the vast majority of women the cost is a barrier and the lack of a pay pig makes it unlikely to ever be a realistic option. The second problem is the limited number of donors. One London clinic boast on its website that it has 25,000 vials of high quality sperm on ice, but when you look deeper they have only found 500 sperm donors since 2010.

For these career women who want to fulfill their “right” to have a baby at any cost, fine, its their money. It is one more example of women putting their needs above all else including the child’s. Remember the research on the outcomes for children from single parent families? The wealth of the mother does not make much difference to those outcomes, it merely alters the ways in which those outcomes manifest themselves.

So, for the majority of women finding a male partner becomes the priority and when women hit their thirties their clock is ticking and they are much less likely to risk trying to present you with another man’s child as if it were yours, because time is against them.

Use Science to be certain and her biological clock for leverage

Once you have established a relationship and decided together that you want it to be a committed, exclusive, life long relationship, insist that you both sign an agreement consenting to paternity tests for any children born to the relationship. If she doesn’t agree that you have the same right to certainty that she has kick her to the curb and move on. If she plays the “If you loved me you would trust me” card, kick her to the curb and run. The moment any woman uses that statement in relation to anything, you can be certain that she is attempting to deceive you and in this instance it is with a view to keeping her options open. In reality, by her early thirties her clock is ticking loud and clear and given that she is not pregnant at this stage she has nothing to hide and potentially a lot to lose, so if she loves you she should be only to happy to give you that certainty. There are other women and if enough men are playing the game there will be some who have already learnt that men want certainty of paternity and without it they are willing to walk. Remember, time is on our side.

Having gained consent to a paternity test for any children, when those happy days arrive, do not let your feelings cloud your judgement. Do not look at her and the baby think you don’t need to do the tests. DO THE TEST. It is safe, non invasive, painless and quick. If you do not do the test for one child you are opening up the door for her in relation to any subsequent children.

Emotional strength

We have the ability and the mental strength to control our emotions. This, in itself, drives women nuts. Women on the other hand have almost no control of theirs. This makes them weak. It results in them behaving irrationally, making ill considered choices and being unable to think through to a logical conclusion the consequences and repercussions of their actions.

But be on your guard, women are aware of this and the assault on this male advantage has already begun. How often do we hear women bemoaning the fact that men don’t show their emotions, how they want men to show their feelings. They do not appreciate the benefit that the differences between the genders bring to a relationship or to children. Basically they want you to be a woman with a penis. Do not be fooled, maintain control. If you don’t they will emotionally emasculate you. It is yet one more example of the I want a unicorn mentality that modern women have developed. Another example of the “I wish” mentality that does not stop to look at the long term consequences, but as I have already shown, women are not big on considering the consequences of their actions. All they know is that they want, they want it all, they want it on their terms and they want it now and to hell with the cost or the consequences.

THE FEMALE COUNTER ATTACK

Women, feminists in particular will counter by saying that they don’t need a man to get pregnant they can use IVF or other fertility treatments.

If they want to pursue that route let them, at least you don’t have to pay for it and there are plenty of decent women who do want a man and a relationship in which both parties respect each other. These women will be willing to wait.

The go it alone strategy will fail for 3 key reasons.

If women want to go the solo route they would have to find and pay for private treatment. Realistically the cost of treatment and then raising a child on their own typically puts it out of the reach of most women.

The number of men donating sperm is quite small so the gene pool is small. Whilst the quality of the sperm might be high, they cannot guarantee the same of the source. If too many women want to go this route it will become a public health issue which will require the government to step in. It raises the prospect in 20 years time of half siblings unknowingly entering into relationships with each other. There are cases on record already of this happening where the children did not know that they had different mothers but the same father as a result of infidelity.

Burden on the state. If the number of women going the solo parent route grows to a statistically significant level this could become a financial burden on the state and the state will have to act.

PRIVILEGES

Though out history men have extended a range of privileges to women which women have now come to view as a right, to such an extend that they rely on these ”rights” to abuse men. The time has come to remind women that these are privileges, the courtesies that we afforded them as part of a culture of mutual respect. Women no longer extend men any respect and now lay claim to these courtesies as rights. The time has come to remind them that they are not something that they can demand as a right, by revoking them. Courtesies are afforded out of respect.

Privilege; Men don’t hit women.

Women now view this to mean men cannot hit a woman under any circumstances. A casual trawl through You tube turns up far to many videos of women punching, slapping, beating and trying to humiliate men, often in public and often while being egged on by other women, and then playing the “you can’t hit me I’m a woman” card. You could be forgiven for thinking that they have turned it into a sport akin to bear baiting.

NEWS FLASH: PRIVILEGE REVOKED

NO MAN SHOULD EVER INSTIGATE AN ACT OF VIOLENCE AGAINST A WOMAN.

By the same token a woman should not hit a man. But if she hits you first that is assault and you are entitled to defend yourself. You are no longer required to just stand there and take it.

MARRIAGE and RELATIONSHIPS

With regards marriage, in a word DON’T. This also applies to civil partnerships if proposed changes to UK family law to extend civil partnerships to opposite sex couples is passed into law.

For men in the 21st century there is no upside to marriage, it is all downside. As far as children are concerned the likelihood that the woman will lie about the paternity of a child is unacceptably high and frankly obscene. If you are married she can legally declare that you are the father on the birth certificate, whether you are the biological father. This brings with it obligations which the government and the family courts will use to fleece you for everything you have if she divorces you. It allows her to cheat on you safe in the knowledge that you either have to live with it and pay the price psychologically or divorce her and pay the price financially. Among other things it places statutory parental responsibilities upon you and bestows rights on her and the child with respect to your estate when you die.

If the marriage or civil partnership fails and ends in divorce you become a meal ticket for life. To make matters worse, as I write this in 2018 the family courts are yet again looking at how they can introduce the concept of no fault divorce which will give women yet another stick to beat men with. I can hear the little darlings bleating now “ I want a unicorn and if I cant have one I want a divorce, now pay up”.

If you cheat on her and she files for divorce YOU pay, in many cases for life.

If she cheats on you and you file for divorce YOU pay, quite possibly for life.

Now they want to allow her to file for divorce for no reason whatsoever, and guess what? YOU WILL PAY, FOR LIFE.

In effect the state through the family courts is telling women that they can do what ever they want because some poor sap will have to pick up the bill and support them for life.

Women, the government and the judiciary have turned marriage into a racket and men are the marks.

DON’T BE A SAP, DON’T GET MARRIED

Co habit, live together as man and wife but without giving her legal status. Remove the incentive that the state has so generously bestowed on women to behave in the way they do in 21st century western society and take control of your life and your relationships.

FINANCIAL

Myth: Women marry for love

Why are hurricanes named after women?

Because when they arrive they are wet and wild, when they leave they take your house and your car.

It’s an old joke but never was a truer word spoken in jest

A survey of women revealed that 33% of women would marry for money. They don’t love you, they don’t respect you, they don’t necessarily want YOUR children, they want THEIR children (not necessarily by you), your resources, your time, your money and if you are in a position of power either commercially, professionally or politically, the trappings and any advantages they can draw from that too. But remember this, they will destroy your reputation at the drop of a hat, in some cases simply out of spite or just because they can. They will empty your wallet and when the money runs out so will they, at the first opportunity, for the next meal ticket.

Financial rules for men in the 21st century

Do not get married, repeat after me, DO NOT GET MARRIED.

Do not under any circumstances contemplate, let alone agree to a joint checking account to pool your combined earnings. Set up a separate account to cover bills for rent, mortgage, utilities etc. and you both put in your equal contributions into this

Do not under any circumstances give any woman access to or information about your earnings or investments.

Do not under any circumstances allow any woman to use your joint incomes to apply for credit cards.

Give power of attorney to a close, trusted, male relative or lawyer, stipulating strict conditions relating to the management of your financial affairs in the event that you become incapacitated and unable to manage them yourself due to medical emergency, accident etc.

In the event of an unplanned pregnancy, if the woman refuses to agree to a paternity test you must refuse to be named as the resulting child’s father in the register of births and on the birth certificate. You must make a will specifically excluding the woman and the child from any part of your estate on the occurrence of your death. Ensure that the woman is aware that this will be the consequence before you ask for her consent to a paternity test. Let her make an informed choice. Men, if she still refuses then in all likelihood the child is not yours.

If the woman still refuses to agree to a paternity test this is not a guarantee that the child is not yours, her pride might overpower her objectivity, remember that inability to control their emotions. Therefore, it would be unwise to kick her to the curb at this stage. If you do that she will have no problem demanding a paternity test from you to prove you are the father so that she can claim support through the courts. Instead wait for the right moment and do the test yourself. Since you only want to know that you are the father it only requires a sample from you and the child. The tests are simple, safe and non invasive and are available online for as little as £60 in the UK at the time of writing. If the test proves you are the father your partner need never know you did it, if it says you are not or might not be the father do not act in haste. Challenge her on it and suggest that you both need to get a test done by a government accredited laboratory. If that gives the same result kick her and her bastard to the curb.

PROTECT YOURSELF OR PAY FOR LIFE AND PAY WHEN YOU DIE

THE WORK PLACE

Women have made the work place a toxic space where no man is safe. They have forced men to change their behaviour so return the favour.

If a female co worker is showing cleavage or wears a skirt or dress that is too short or is otherwise dressed in a way that can be seen as provocative, complain to your manager and HR. department that you feel this woman’s clothing is inappropriate and too provocative for the work place and request that they take action to remedy the issue.

Never allow yourself to be in a one 2 one situation with a female co worker or manager. If your work requires one to one communication do it by phone. If possible record all such calls. Remember to advise the other person that you are recording the call, failure to do so could constitute a civil or criminal offence or at the very least make any recording inadmissible if you have to rely on it to defend yourself.

If your job requires some one 2 one, face to face interaction with female colleagues insist on a male chaperone.

Be aware of who is around you and in open plan offices and sit with male colleagues. In private offices keep your door open at all times.

Avoid business trips with female colleagues. If it is unavoidable insist that your employer makes separate travel arrangements for you and that you are not booked into the same hotel as the female colleague. Do not socialise with the female colleague after business for the day is done and definitely do not accompany her to dinner.

Do not under any circumstance mentor female co workers. You teach her how to do your job, someone makes an allegation of inappropriate behaviour, you get fired and she gets your job, your career is ruined and to all intents and purposes you are unemployable. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED.

The goal should be to create gender segregated work spaces as far as is practical.

Whilst some women are not going to cause you any problems, too many are just looking for the opportunity. Remember, they have been empowered and all they can think of to do with that power is to abuse it to the detriment of men. They do so with impunity, safe in the knowledge that the outcome for them will never be unfavourable. They only have to say it and you are guilty of it.

PROTECT YOURSELF.

WHY SHOULD YOU TAKE THE RISK?

WHERE IS THE UPSIDE?

THE SECOND FRONT – GOVERNMENT

Political objectives

The repeal of the law relating to the Presumption of Paternity.

The introduction of statutory DNA tests to confirm paternity at birth.

The Problem

The Government will not change the law willingly. All efforts by men’s rights groups have failed to get anywhere with government in terms of legislation and the same is true of the judiciary with regards to men’s rights, family law or the way they interpret family law. Further, it has had no impact on the further erosion of men’s rights in relation to the recommendations that the judiciary make to government with regards changes to family law.

In effect the government and courts have discriminated against men for the benefit of women with regards family law and tried to shame men into silence by claiming that the child’s interests must come first. But as we have seen, the child’s interests rarely come into it. It is about putting women’s interest first whilst denying men any say and using the legal system to make men pay. In effect women have been given a free pass to do what ever they like, with impunity, and they have duly weaponised children for use against men with the complicit support of government and the judiciary. We must now force the government to make our children a de militarized zone for the sake of our children.

We do not have to demand changes to all the laws that negatively impact on our children or us as men and fathers. Changes to key laws will result in circumstances, a domino effect, that will force the government into addressing the rest.

It is time for men to address this as a matter of urgency and the ballot box is your friend. Do not waste time, resources or energy trying to lobby or consult main stream politicians. They will play along while we waste time and precious resources fighting on the battlefield of their choice. If we are to win we must choose the battlefield and tactics most appropriate for the resources we can deploy. Remember, the government will always be formed by main stream political parties who will not include our demands in their manifestos unless there is a perceived electoral benefit. The main political parties in the UK have no interest in men’s rights because the current situation works for them, they do not perceive there to be any benefit to them in changing it, In addition, if the 600,000 men subjected to paternity fraud had known about it and had kicked those women to the curb the potential cost to the government and society is something they do not want to contemplate, because if this man isn’t the father the mother must then be compelled to disclose the identity of the real father. If she does and he is married with children that destroys another family when the real father is pursued for maintenance. If she does not disclose or genuinely doesn’t know who the father is, will the state be prepared to leave this child without financial support? In my opinion the answer should be yes but the state would not agree with me. Until it does women will continue to behave in this irresponsible way because they know someone, somewhere will have to pay “because of the child”. The system is predicated on innocent men being required to accept being defrauded, duped and denied their reproductive rights and turned into pay pigs. Basically the state has taken the view that in their opinion leaving you in the hot seat is the least bad option for the state and for women so your rights don’t matter, just man up and pay up.

However, career politicians are for the most part a generally disgusting breed who, when it comes to retaining power will sell their beliefs, their stated policies and their own mothers down the river at the drop of a hat. Do not forget that BREXIT occurred because a political party sought to attract votes from anti EU parties in order retain power, not because an anti EU party was elected into power, or because the leader of the main stream party, the next Prime Minister believed in it or wanted it (even if the majority of the electorate did) but because they saw it as their best chance of winning the election.

Men USE YOUR VOTE, don’t believe it has no effect. In local and national elections use your vote and use it thus:

There is a constant push to get more women into politics, if we are to win, this is one of the political establishments weak spots. In any election, if a woman candidate is standing, do not vote for her, vote for the male candidate most likely to be able to defeat her, irrespective of his political views. Keep women out of your local authorities, keep women out of Parliament. If they want our vote they will have to start recognising what their gender is doing to men and stand on a platform that genuinely promotes equality and fairness between men and women, not as they currently do on a platform to promote women’s rights over men’s rights, thinly disguised as an equality platform.

With any political campaign either direct or indirect, it is essential that politicians know what our objectives are. To that end whether it is a local or national election write to all candidates on the ballot paper for your council ward or parliamentary constituency to ask for their views on our legislative objectives:

The repeal of the law relating to the Presumption of Paternity. The introduction of statutory DNA tests to confirm paternity at birth.

Where a positive response is received engage with that politician and ask them if they will refer to their support for our objectives in their personal statement on their manifesto or in their campaign literature.

If there are no female candidates, cast your vote for which ever candidate on the ballot paper has offered support for our objectives. If there is no support forthcoming vote for the candidate with the most socially objectionable manifesto. Write to them suggesting that there is potential support to be garnered from the male vote by putting our aims in their manifestos or campaign literature. If they are allowed to stand for election you are allowed to vote for them. Therefore, if Joseph Mengele is reincarnated and stands for election, if he will state that he shares our objectives in his campaign literature give him your vote. If these people get elected or even come close to being elected the main stream political parties will have to sit up, take notice and do something, because they understand that once the taboo for voting for people with distasteful views is broken wider sections of society will cease to feel socially inhibited from voting for people with more extreme but none the less populist agendas and the main stream fears populism. For the most part people with these views are kept out of public office through the use of shaming tactics by the main stream political parties and the media who tell us that these people are evil disgusting people who have no place in the modern world and should be shunned and shut out of society. Therefore, if you vote for them you too should be shunned and stigmatised. Don’t be afraid to break the taboo, it’s a secret ballot, no one gets to know who you voted for, but everyone gets to share in the love. Don’t be afraid to break the taboo, remember you do not have to believe in their policies or platform, delivery of that is not our objective, unless of course the main stream fail to act and address men’s legitimate grievances in which case they get to reap what they have sown. Women and main stream political parties will then have to face the consequences of their intransigence.

REMEMBER

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH – NO MORE

Forseti