What do groups like this advocate for? Getting the age of consent down to 5 or even younger. Not unlike PIE, the pedophile exchange network which ran out in the open for years even being allowed to sell periodicals on news stands before Good people Took a Stand! There is a 60 minutes Australia series on this which used to be found on Youtube. With their censorship it may disappear. Here is a report I did on this last year. Part 1

First thoughts on this survey, It Is ILLEGAL behavior to begin with, so why would you "role play" this type of scenario? According to what other independent journalist findings have researched, a group called Heart Progress has been allowed to have and operate a facebook page. If you are not familiar with them, they are avid supporters of a group called NAMBLA also referred to as a type of mafia. Their name says it all in plain English, yet numerous leftists still condone and applaud their goals and behavior. Their acronym stands for North American Man Boy Love Association. You can find articles on Heart Progress in the left leaning Salon owned by Salon Media Group. They feature pedophiles who like the term minor attracted person and their stories.

Upon first glance any good, common sense person existing on this globe thinks they must be reading this wrong. No, sadly this actually happened! This would have happened on March 4th of this year, 2018 where Facebook actually ran a survey asking users advice on how they, facebook should handle grooming behavior. What has this world come to for leftists. In the wake of Linda Sarsour organized marches and advocacy of children including those from the "Tide Pod" generation casting votes and having a say on adult issues. This is just a gateway into children having the protected right under government to give their consent on other issues as well. It is a Clear agenda!



Here is part 2

According to The Guardian, "one question began. “In thinking about an ideal world where you could set Facebook’s policies, how would you handle the following: a private message in which an adult man asks a 14-year-old girl for sexual pictures.”

The options available to respondents ranged from “this content should not be allowed on Facebook, and no one should be able to see it” to “this content should be allowed on Facebook, and I would not mind seeing it”.

A second question asked who should decide the rules around whether or not the adult man should be allowed to ask for such pictures on Facebook. Options available included “Facebook users decide the rules by voting and tell Facebook” and “Facebook decides the rules on its own”.

In neither survey question did Facebook allow users to indicate that law enforcement or child protection should be involved in the situation: the strictest option allowed involved turning to the social network as arbiter."

This is what their survey looked like ![Screen Shot 2018-03-09 at 1.28.04 PM.png]

( )

Yvette Cooper MP, chair of the Home Affairs Select Committee, stated it well when she said, “This is a stupid and irresponsible survey,” she said. “Adult men asking 14-year-olds to send sexual images is not only against the law, it is completely wrong and an appalling abuse and exploitation of children. I cannot imagine that Facebook executives ever want it on their platform but they also should not send out surveys that suggest they might tolerate it or suggest to Facebook users that this might ever be acceptable.”

Facebook's VP, Guy Rosen admitted the surveys were a mistake. Discerning people have to be asking, "then why were they Even put out there in the first place?" What is the purpose of putting out those kind of feelers that appear to be testing the waters. Who would need to know this? We all know Exactly who would benefit from this information.

Here is the link https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/mar/05/facebook-men-children-sexual-images