Kemal Derviş makes a point that identity crisis has become widespread among Europeans and "the question of national identity is reshaping Europe’s political landscape." This trend seems to be the more evident in the last two decades, after the fall of the Soviet Union and the EU eastward enlargement. The closer ties the European Union tries to forge, by strengthening its "economic institutions and policies," the more controversial and paradox at times the "identity politics" in its member states have become. The latest UK election and the landslide victory of the Scottish National Party had sparked debates about Britain's national identity and its "common destiny with Europe."

No doubt globalisation and trade liberalisation had played a role in alienating many Europeans, who, lacking skills and education to cope with mounting challenges, must take the short end of the stick - unemployment, dwindling income and declining living standards. Following the global financial crisis state authorities in some Eurozone countries can no long provide for social and public services. Their grievances are often being exploited by far-right or far-left populist parties, that "foster chauvinism, invidious discrimination, and open antagonism" against foreigners, the political elite and establishment.

The "bi-polar system" of the post-war Europe has weathered many storms. While conservatives have always been avid adherents of a laissez-faire economic policy, liberals and social democrats support a free-market economy and a social welfare programme. The European Union has been able to function, by cherry picking the principles of this "bi-polar system." Yet "identity-driven political movements" have emerged that undermine the dominance of the mainstream parties. It's also a reason why these parties oscillate and pander to myopic policies to win electoral support of fringe groups. A result thereof is the fragmentation of Europe's political landscape! Although people have their say, they do not always make the right decision.