The push by Conservatives senators to amend Stephen Harper’s elections act had all the elements of a marvelous yarn.

The unelected senators had taken their revenge, biting back and riding in on their white steed to save democracy, showing their relevancy and putting the government on its heels.

Unfortunately, it is nonsense.

What Conservatives senators have really done is give the government cover to suddenly shift course, drop their bullying demeanour and pretend to be reasonable and conciliatory then go ahead and pass a deeply flawed bill with nothing more than cosmetic tweaks.

As Craig Scott, the Toronto New Democrat and his party’s democratic reform critic put it: “They’re putting lipstick on two pigs — themselves and this bill.’’

Conservatives have already won the early communications battle over this bill by focusing on the vouching question, leaving the other problems with the legislation floating through the Ottawa bubble.

The two opposition parties have been unable to succinctly explain to Canadians why the proposed legislation stacks the deck in favour of the Conservatives and hurts democracy in this country.

That adds to the odds that somehow the proposed amendments will be given more weight than they are worth, wrapping this saga up with a nice bow, as the Senate flexes its muscle and the Harper governments feigns flexibility.

Like so much in Ottawa, this is less than meets the eye.

Conservatives did bell the cat, realizing after hearing from only 21 witnesses over six meetings that this bill was not passing the smell test, but its “pre-study” actually gets in the way of the work of a Commons committee that will hear from four times the number of witnesses and has not yet started working on amendments.

The most serious amendment is the one that would kill a provision lifting limits on what parties could spend on election fundraising from donors over the past five years, a move critics said would benefit richer parties like the Conservatives.

But the senators would only “clarify” Elections Canada’s new reduced role of promoting voting so it can still go into schools with get out the vote efforts. They would not go beyond that.

They would also only extend the retention of robocall records to three years from the proposed one, still well short of a complete election cycle.

They would still allow victorious parties to appoint poll supervisors and they do nothing to fully restore vouching, where one voter can confirm the right to vote of another.

Forcing First Nations, homeless shelters and old age homes to provide addresses if asked and allowing e-bills to be presented as valid proof of residence are only half-steps.

They do nothing to compel testimony for the Elections Commissioner during investigations, something all parties agreed to in a vote two years ago.

New Democrats launched a campaign Tuesday that has little or no hope of success, but keeps the issue alive.

They plan to try to pry Conservatives off one-by-one in a bid to get to a dirty dozen who will vote with the opposition to kill the bill.

Loading... Loading... Loading... Loading... Loading... Loading...

They can even name you six early targets, wobbly Tories who they believe can be shamed into voting against the bill.

It is hard to imagine, however, 12 brave Conservatives bucking the party on a signature piece of legislation.

Better to latch on to a hodge-podge series of weak amendments as an artificial show of good faith and save your political career.

The basics with this bill have not really changed from the Conservative perspective.

They already know that four Canadians in 10 don’t vote, six in 10 in the age category 18-25 didn’t vote in 2011 and that swath of the electorate is paying no attention to the legislation.

They believe opposition to the bill rests with a noisy, but irrelevant (to them) segment of the population that would not vote Conservative anyway.

They like their chances on taking on the “elites,’’ the editorialists, the pundits and the experts they like to demonize.

They believe opposition MPs are hearing from constituents because the election act has become the latest vessel for anti-Harper sentiment but once passed, opposition criticism will simply sound as so much bleating from losers.

They maintain their MPs are not hearing from voters in their ridings and they point to 2011 when opposition cries of “democratic deficits” and lack of transparency and accountability and contempt of Parliament was so much white noise that blew away with the prevailing winds early in the campaign.

The Senate has given them the cover they need to try it all again.

It is still up to the elected opposition to push back.

Tim Harper is a national affairs writer. His column appears Monday, Wednesday and Friday. tharper@thestar.ca Twitter:@nutgraf1

Read more about: