The chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee Tuesday called in a Tweet for someone in the Department of Justice to name a special prosecutor to look into the Uranium One scandal.

Whoever in DOJ is capable w authority to appoint a special counsel shld do so to investigate Uranium One "whoever" means if u aren't recused — ChuckGrassley (@ChuckGrassley) October 25, 2017

Trending: Bezos-Linked Thinktank Official Calls for Michael Anton’s Execution for Exposing Anti-Trump Color Revolution

The Tweet follows up on Senator Grassley‘s own call Thursday to have the Justice Department to lift the non-disclosure agreement preventing a former FBI confidential informant from speaking to Congress about the handling of a criminal probe linked to a controversial deal that ceded ownership of U.S. uranium assets to the Russian government.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense? VOTE NOW: Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot three BLM rioters?

Did Kyle Rittenhouse act in self defense when he shot 3 BLM rioters? * Yes, his life was in danger. No, his safety wasn’t threatened by an armed attacker.

Email *

Phone This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Completing this poll grants you access to Big League Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Despite an ongoing criminal investigation into officials working for subsidiaries of Rosatom, the Russian government entity seeking to acquire ownership of U.S. uranium, the Obama Administration approved the deal, he said.

The Justice Department has reportedly threatened to prosecute the informant if he discloses details of his involvement in the investigation,” he said.

“The Executive Branch does not have the authority to use non-disclosure agreements to avoid congressional scrutiny,” he said.

“If the FBI is allowed to contract itself out of congressional oversight, it would seriously undermine our constitutional system of checks and balances,” he said.

The Justice Department needs to work with the Committee to ensure that witnesses are free to speak without fear, intimidation or retaliation from law enforcement. Witnesses who want to talk to Congress should not be gagged and threatened with prosecution for talking. If that has happened, senior DOJ leadership needs to fix it and release the witness from the gag order,” Grassley said.

Grassley was responding to news reports that a U.S. businessman-turned-confidential informant documented bribes, extortion and money laundering by Russian entities that were attempting to secure U.S. government approval of a deal to acquire Uranium One. Uranium One at the time was said to have the rights to 20 percent of American uranium assets at the time.

The media reports said that the informant has information regarding payments made by Russian executives to a U.S. entity that supported the Clinton Foundation, controlled by President William J. Clinton.

Despite the informant’s detailed reports to the FBI and an ongoing criminal investigation, the Obama administration and the Secretary of State Hillary R. Clinton approved the sale of controlling interest in Uranium One by the Russian company Rosatom.

Grassley has long had the reputation as the guardian of whistleblowers. In early 2011, insiders aware of the both President Barack Obama’s Fast and Furious Mexican gunrunning program and that one of the weapons from the Fast and Furious program killed Border Patrol agent Brian Terry reached out to Grassley first. Because Grassley was not a committee chairman, since the Senate was controlled by the Democrats, the senator reached out himself to Chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Rep. Darrell Issa (R.-Calif.). That is why it was Issa and his committee that issued the subpoenas and conducted hearings on that scandal, not Grassley.

The Judiciary Committee chairman also requested that several federal agencies involved in approving the Uranium acquisition if they had any knowledge of the ongoing criminal investigation and all communications relating to donations made to the Clinton Foundation by interested parties in the transaction, including the Justice and State departments.

The chairman also demanded information about any non-disclosure agreements related to the Uranium One deal.