







proven

Here's a recent tweet from Scott Adamswhich perfectly sums up the Russia hysteria from the left since November 8th:Seeing as how the brainwashed left have been completely indoctrinated to believe that apparently Russia are the enemy now, let's review both the left's and Donald Trump's proven interactions with Russia. First, the left:* Hillary Clinton sold 20% of the US's uranium capacity to Russia.* Shortly after this, Bill Clinton received half a million dollars for a speech in Russia.* Russian money flowed into the Clinton Foundation during the time period of the uranium deal.* Hillary Clinton's campaign chairman, John Podesta, bought 75,000 shares in Uranium One, the Russian company who benefited from the uranium deal.* The Podesta Group received $170,000 to lobby on behalf of Russia's largest bank, Sberbank.Sberbank has a reputation for close ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin and to Russian intelligence services.* Obama was caught on an open mic secretly saying he could be more flexible with Russia after the election.Now Donald Trump:* Wants to work closer with Russia on mutual goals such as defeating ISIS.Given all of the above, it seems incredible that the left are still pushing an anti-Russia narrative. And even more incredible is the fact that large chunks of the brainwashed public are still falling for it!Here's a reply to Scott Adams' tweet which perfectly sums up the hypocrisy of the left.The tweet couldn't have summed it up better. If the brainwashed left want to paint Russia as the enemy, then why hasn't Hillary Clinton been charged with treason? Wouldn't selling uranium to the enemies of America constitute treason?And if Russia aren't the enemy, as Hillary Clinton presumably herself acknowledged when she approved the uranium deal, then why is it a bad idea to work with Russia to defeat ISIS?Of course the whole point of the Russia hysteria from the left is to use it as an excuse for Hillary Clinton losing the election. To claim that Russia were behind the leaked Podesta emails which revealed the dishonesty and corruption of Hillary Clinton, Obama, and the Clinton campaign team.Let's be clear, Julian Assange and Craig Murray have repeatedly stated that the Podesta emails didn't come from the Russian government. Do we trust the word of Wikileaks with their ten year record of authenticity? Or do we trust the word of proven liarslike Obama, John Brennan, and James Clasper?And just as importantly, it can't be stated enough times that everything Wikileaks released was 100% accurate. If the truth damaged Hillary's campaign, that's on her.Whoever leaked the Podesta emails is a hero. They helped expose lies. They helped expose corruption. This is what investigative journalists used to do back in the days when journalism was a profession with integrity. The person who leaked the emails is a hero, just as the journalists who exposed Watergate were heroes.The anti-Russia narrative being pushed by the left needs to stop. America and Russia share the goal of defeating ISIS. Why is working together with Russia to defeat ISIS such a bad thing?And again, if the left remain so keen to paint Russia as the enemy, then why did Hillary Clinton approve the uranium deal?Once again, the anti-Russia hysteria needs to stop. It is being fed to gullible sheep looking to validate the things they believe which have no basis in truth and reality. Look again at the list ofinteractions with Russia, then take a look at the following quote which the left may find familiar:- - - - - - - - - -