This email has also been verified by Google DKIM 2048-bit RSA key

Re: NYTimes: Hillary Clinton and the Super Trough

Thanks, Marc. We have a memo from Brennan with a menu of options, some of which are mentioned below. Policy team will circle with Dan and dig in further and come back with some concrete options. On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Elias, Marc (Perkins Coie) < MElias@perkinscoie.com> wrote: > The leading bills on this are sarbanes' and prices' in the house and > durbins in the senate. > > If you are looking for general election type things to support -- the > voter modernization bill is a great one. Increases the right to vote, saves > states money etc. Brennan has a version as does Schumer. Pew also has > something similar. It has some limited gop support too. > > Not campaign finance but involves elections. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On May 9, 2015, at 11:48 AM, Jake Sullivan <jsullivan@hillaryclinton.com> > wrote: > > Guys - this is what I was raising with you all on the call on Thursday > when we discussed next steps on campaign finance reform. As Marc says, it > is match for small dollar donations. I continue to think this would be a > smart move - and I believe we can support the bill or at least a variant of > the proposal. I'm adding Dan because we have already done work with the > Brennan Center on this topic. > > DISCLOSE is good too, but I would go further. > > Maya, in working these up, touch base with Dan on the work already done. > > On May 9, 2015, at 11:39 AM, Maya Harris <mharris@hillaryclinton.com> > wrote: > > I will touch base with our experts on EMPOWER. They also mentioned > DISCLOSE as a consensus D party reform. But will look into it further and > circle back. > > > On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Elias, Marc (Perkins Coie) < > MElias@perkinscoie.com> wrote: > >> I am not familiar with Udall¹s bill specifically, but it seems to be >> another version of the dominant reform theme ‹ create a super match for >> small donations ‹ i.e. 5 to 1 or 10 to 1. If someone has the bill text (I >> could not find it) I can look at quickly. >> >> I would think that the easiest bill for her to support ‹ I am sure she >> endorsed in the past ‹ is the DISCLOSE Act. It twice garnered near >> unanimous Democratic support in Congress but failed for lack of GOP >> support. >> >> -- >> Marc E. Elias >> Perkins Coie LLP >> 700 13th St, NW >> Washington, DC 20005 >> 202-434-1609 (ph) >> 202-654-9126 (fax) >> melias@perkinscoie.com >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ----- >> From: Robby Mook <re47@hillaryclinton.com> >> Date: Saturday, May 9, 2015 at 11:16 AM >> To: Jennifer Palmieri <jennifer.m.palmieri@gmail.com> >> Cc: Marc Elias <melias@perkinscoie.com>, John Podesta >> <john.podesta@gmail.com>, Maya Harris <mharris@hillaryclinton.com>, Jake >> Sullivan <jsullivan@hillaryclinton.com>, Kristina Schake >> <kschake@hillaryclinton.com>, Dennis Cheng <dcheng@hillaryclinton.com> >> Subject: Re: NYTimes: Hillary Clinton and the Super Trough >> >> Would be great to back something concrete. >> >> >> >> > On May 9, 2015, at 11:10 AM, Jennifer Palmieri >> ><jennifer.m.palmieri@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Elias - you familiar with this legislation? Is it something she should >> >support?, >> > >> > >> > >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.nytimes.com_2015_0 >> >> >5_09_opinion_hillary-2Dclinton-2Dand-2Dthe-2Dsuper-2Dtrough.html-3Fsmid-3D >> >> >nytcore-2Dipad-2Dshare-26smprod-3Dnytcore-2Dipad&d=AwIFaQ&c=XRWvQHnpdBDRh- >> >> >yzrHjqLpXuHNC_9nanQc6pPG_SpT0&r=mJZthOcamSml7FV7KXYLE6P2EQrjV525p9lKVucDNW >> >> >I&m=VFrdSxeVs8usEJTUZ2mihXQNnzpLhKRrL6t2JE2E8h0&s=vb0l2aiitKv0PbPEi3Wf82Vl >> >aKho9AcIDNhBshRcplQ&e= >> > >> > Can she stand for reform as she embraces ³super PACs²? All candidates >> >should address the risks these funding vehicles pose to the democratic >> >process. >> > >> > >> > Sent from my iPad >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other confidential >> information. If you have received it in error, please advise the sender by >> reply email and immediately delete the message and any attachments without >> copying or disclosing the contents. Thank you. >> > > > ------------------------------ > > NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other confidential > information. If you have received it in error, please advise the sender by > reply email and immediately delete the message and any attachments without > copying or disclosing the contents. Thank you. >