Hillary Clinton:

“I’ve been closing very strongly since Feb. 20,” she said, referring to the day after Mr. Obama won Hawaii and Wisconsin. “I have won more votes and won more states than Senator Obama. All the independent analyses break in my direction. A lot of the key states that we have to win, I win those states.”

Obama has won 32 states (including the Texas caucuses) plus DC. Clinton has won 19 (including the Texas primary). Now of course, Clinton is using a little sleight of hand to disenfranchise the states that voted before February 20. That's 37 states. Aravosis:

How do you magically choose February 20th as the day after which primaries and caucuses count, but any that happened before that date don't count? How - because only after February 19 does Hillary win more states. Now how many states do you think Hillary has thrown out of her calculations because their primaries and caucuses happened before? 38 states. That's 76% of the states not counted. Yes, Hillary's argument is that if you throw out the results in 38 of the 50 states, then she wins more states than Obama [...] So, under Hillary's absurd math you only count the last 24% of the game, and ignore the first 76%.

The states that Clinton no longer thinks matter:

Alabama Illinois New Jersey

Alaska Iowa New Mexico

Arizona Kansas New York

Arkansas Louisiana North Dakota

California Maine Ohio

Colorado Maryland Oklahoma

Connecticut Massachusetts South Carolina

D.C. Michigan Tennessee

Delaware Minnesota Utah

Florida Missouri Virginia

Georgia Nebraska Washington

Hawaii Nevada Wisconsin

Idaho New Hampshire

Par for the course for a campaign that has long mocked the notion of a 50-state party. Heck, it has long mocked the notion of a 50-state nation.