1. Introduction 2. Sapphire R9 285 ITX Compact 3. Sapphire R9 285 ITX Compact (High Res Gallery) 4. MSI GTX760 Gaming Mini ITX 5. MSI GTX760 Gaming Mini ITX (High Res Gallery) 6. Testing Methodology 7. 3DMark Vantage 8. 3DMark 11 9. 3DMark 10. Unigine Heaven Benchmark 11. Unigine Valley Benchmark 12. Grid AutoSport (1080p and 1600p) 13. Grid AutoSport (4k) 14. Thief (1080p and 1600p) 15. Tomb Raider (1080p and 1600p) 16. Tomb Raider (4k) 17. Metro Last Light Redux (1080p and 1600p) 18. Thermal Dynamics 19. Acoustics Performance 20. Power Consumption 21. Overclocking 22. Closing Thoughts 23. View All Pages

If you are building a new Mini ITX system then the graphics choices can be limited. Two of the leading solutions on the market right now are the MSI GTX760 Gaming Mini ITX and the Sapphire R9 285 ITX Compact. Both of these diminutive cards ship in a moderately overclocked state with custom coolers. Both solutions are priced below the £200 ‘sweet spot’, but how do they compare?





The R9 285 was a recent release by AMD and we covered multiple reviews of partner cards on launch day back at the start of September. The R9 285, along with the R9 290/X and R7 260X features a programmable audio pipeline. This TrueAudio technology is designed for game audio artists and engineers, so they can ‘bring their artistic vision beyond sound production into the realm of sound processing’.

The R9 285 is a 256 bit architecture design, which seems like a downgrade when compared directly to the 384 bit R9 280. AMD however are using a lossless delta colour compression (DCC) algorithm to get a 40% efficiency improvement. The colour data is being stored in a lossless compressed format using delta encoding – this is handled automatically on the fly.

Geometry performance has improved dramatically over the older part. Their 4xPrim rate has improved tessellation (2-4x) when compared to the R9 280. They have managed to enhance performance from improving their work distribution between geometry front end units and improved vertex re-use when dealing with many small triangles.

Multimedia areas have been improved including a new Unified Video Decoder which provides a full fixed function decode engine with support for H.264, VC-1, MPEG4, MPEG2 and MJPEG. It also adds support for high frame rate 4K H.264 content (High Profile Level 5.2). The new Video Coding Engine provides (up to) 12x faster than real time encoding for full HD and support for 4K resolutions.

The Sapphire R9 285 ITX Compact is available from Overclockers UK for £199.99 inc vat.

Nvidia’s GTX760 is getting a bit long in the tooth and is due for replacement to bring it into line with the latest Maxwell hardware. Still, it is a big seller for Nvidia and is widely available online. This card was a direct replacement for Nvidia’s GTX660 ti back in June 2013. The basespeed of the solution at launch was 980mhz, however as we will see the MSI GTX760 Gaming Mini ITX has received a moderate clock increase to deliver extra performance.

The MSI GTX760 Gaming Mini ITX is available from Amazon with a recent price reduction to £175.59 inc vat.

GPU MSI GTX760 Gaming Mini ITX Sapphire R9 285 ITX Compact Shaders 1152 Cuda Cores 1792 Stream Processors Base Clock (mhz) 1006 928 GPU Boost Clock (mhz) 1072 // Pixel Fillrate (GPixel/s) 32.2 59.4 Texture Units 96 112 Texture fill-rate (GTexel/s) 96.6 103.9 Memory Clock (mhz) 1502 1375 ROPs 32 64 Bus Width (bit) 256 256 Bandwidth (Gb/s) 192.3 176.0

The AMD card on paper looks more powerful, especially when factoring in the 64 ROP’s and 112 texture units – compared to Nvidia’s 32 ROP’s and 96 texture units. The GTX760 definitely has a edge in regards to memory performance/bandwidth, so it will be interesting to see how both MINI ITX solutions stack up in the real world tests.

First let us take a closer look at both cards.

Become a Patron!