Chelsea offered £11million per year to use Wembley Stadium as a temporary home while Stamford Bridge is redeveloped - £3m more than London rivals Tottenham Hotspur's bid.

Spurs need a venue for two years from 2017 and are believed to have offered £8m per year to use the national stadium.

Here, Tottenham fan Barnaby Slater from Spurred On TV tells us why he feels Chelsea have done it to spite their Barclays Premier League rivals, and how a compromise is needed.

Here we go again. First they knocked Spurs out of the Champions League in 2012 by fluking victory against a far superior Bayern Munich in their own backyard. Then they stole Willian from under our noses when we'd already had him at our training ground for his medical.

And now Chelsea are looking to complete their hat-trick by finding £11million in loose change down the back of Roman Abramovich's sofa to pay the FA for temporary use of Wembley Stadium while they redevelop their rickety old shed of a ground.

This grinds somewhat. We need somewhere to go to as we develop White Hart Lane over the next few years and Wembley would be the natural option. It's just a few miles down the road, it has excellent transport links, and it could house 50,000 screaming Spurs fans every other week.

Chelsea take on Tottenham in last season's Capital One Cup final at Wembley, the desired stadium for both

Wembley Stadium could be used for Chelsea games instead of Spurs with a restriction on capacity to 50,000

Tottenham intend to build a new stadium of up to 61,000 capacity within the new few years

Spurs had also been interested in using Wembley as a temporary venue but have been outbid by Chelsea

Chelsea's Roman Abramovich (left) and Tottenham's Daniel Levy (right) both want use of Wembley

With all that in mind, it's obvious what Daniel Levy has to do, surely? Smooth things over with the FA, promise them some corporate dollar and all will be cushy with the world.

But that would be too easy for Spurs. Instead, what's looking likely is that we are going to play at least a season in Milton Keynes at the home of the MK Dons... FIFTY FOUR MILES AWAY.

Yes, that's right. Us loyal Spurs fans will be forced to make that journey every other week, paying for the travel ourselves on top of the excruciatingly high season ticket prices we already pay to watch the fifth best team in English football.

Suffice to say, fans are p***** off about it. It just doesn't make sense.

The reality is that if we move there, a lot of fans won't go, and a lot of the momentum that we're starting to build with our young guns coming through the academy and pushing us towards great things may be lost in a season of regions-based apathy.

Chelsea's Stamford Bridge home as it looks now - the redevelopment work would commence in 2017

Chelsea revealed plans for their new 60,000-capacity stadium at Stamford Bridge last week

The design for the new stadium has been inspired by the architecture of Westminster Abbey

The long and the short of it is that there should be a bit of common sense here.

Why don't Levy and Abramovich get together over a couple of pints of Gazprom and work out a deal together to appease the OAPs at the FA where we split the use of Wembley one week on, one week off?

Hell, if they did that, Harry Kane may even get a few free tickets to Taylor Swift's Wembley tour dates at our new temporary home. And Harry loves Taylor!