Thirty Years Of NSA 'Oversight' And The Only Change Is Better Snooping Technology

from the downhill-with-the-wind-at-its-back dept

Thirty years down the road from a Senate select committee investigation into the NSA and what's changed for the intelligence agency? Based on this 1983 New York Times article (via Bruce Sterling), it appears the only difference is computing power and storage capacity. The NSA began as a virtually uncontrolled entity in 1952 and the next thirty years only saw it expand its grasp.

The power of the N.S.A., whose annual budget and staff are believed to exceed those of either the F.B.I. or the C.I.A., is enhanced by its unique legal status within the Federal Government. Unlike the Agriculture Department, the Postal Service or even the C.I.A., the N.S.A. has no specific Congressional law defining its responsibilities and obligations. Instead, the agency, based at Fort George Meade, about 20 miles northeast of Washington, has operated under a series of Presidential directives. Because of Congress's failure to draft a law for the agency, because of the tremendous secrecy surrounding the N.S.A.'s work and because of the highly technical and thus thwarting character of its equipment, the N.S.A. is free to define and pursue its own goals.

During the course of the investigation, its chairman, Senator Frank Church, repeatedly emphasized his belief that the N.S.A.'s intelligence-gathering activities were essential to the nation's security. He also stressed that the equipment used to watch the Russians could just as easily ''monitor the private communications of Americans.'' If such forces were ever turned against the country's communications system, Senator Church said, ''no American would have any privacy left. ... There would be no place to hide.''

Several months after the hearing, the Senate intelligence committee issued a report that expressed great concern about both the N.S.A.'s activities and the failure of Congress and the Federal courts to comprehend them. ''The watch-list activities and the sophisticated capabilities that they highlight present some of the most crucial privacy issues now facing this nation,'' the committee warned. ''Space-age technology has outpaced the law. The secrecy that has surrounded much of the N.S.A.'s activities and the lack of Congressional oversight have prevented, in the past, bringing statutes in line with the N.S.A.'s capabilities. Neither the courts nor Congress have dealt with the interception of communications using the N.S.A.'s highly sensitive and complex technology.''

The already expansive appetite of American intelligence analysts was further sharpened by technical advances that were occurring, not entirely by chance, at the same time. The technology in question was the digital computer, the wondrous tool diligently developed by American scientists working for such companies as I.B.M., the RCA Corporation and Sperry Rand, and covertly underwritten in a major way by the N.S.A.

Telephone links in the areas where Soviet spies were known to be listening were rerouted via underground cable. To further reduce the leakage of the new category of information, the President directed the N.S.A. to approach large corporations and other institutions, collect information about their communications networks and assist them in safeguarding their material. The Carter directive sanctioning the N.S.A.'s involvement in the planning, organization and development of private communications systems not handling classified secrets was only one of several ways in which the power of the agency grew.

The result of this dialogue so far has been the recommendation by a special committee of the American Council on Education, a prestigious organization of over 1,400 colleges and universities, that all researchers engaged in cryptographic research submit their work to the N.S.A. before publication.

Today, the National Science Foundation routinely allows the N.S.A. to review any request for the funding of cryptographic research. The N.S.A. also has begun providing financial support for related unclassified civilian research.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community. Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis. While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Is it any wonder the agency is prone to abuse? It may claim other entities have oversight, but at this point, it's had 60 years of setting its own agenda and tactics. Concerns that the NSA's power and reach could be misused were voiced by Frank Church (of the Church Committee), whose investigation resulted in the only "oversight" the agency has had to date -- the establishment of the FISA court in 1978.This was a concern in 1983, well before the internet served as the main communication route for millions of Americans and long before storage capacity was measured in zettabytes. And the NSAturn it on American citizens. Repeatedly. The article states the NSA surveilled 75,000 Americans between 1952-1974. These files were shared with the CIA, another agency supposedly charged with targeting non-Americans only. Together, the CIA and NSA developed files on over 300,000 Americans during this time frame. This program, along with a telegram-reading program that ran from 1945-1975, was illegal. Both shut down in May of 1975, when the Senate committee expressed an interest in them.Thirty years ago, there were also concerns about the NSA's "oversight," as the agency's techniques and programs were pretty much incomprehensible to its Congressional oversight.Over the past three decades, the NSA has had an active hand in the development of technology that aids its collection activities.The article also details how the NSA first got its hooks into American telecom companies. After learning the Soviet Union was conducting "wholesale eavesdropping" on communications in four major cities, the Carter administration called for the installation of 100 "voice scramblers" for government use., something the administration didn't bother telling other agencies utilizing the service. In addition, the NSA was sent out to protect American communication from Soviet surveillance, laying the groundwork for its communication interception programs.The agency has also guided developments in cryptography for more than three decades, beginning with a 1978 gag order issued to George Davida to prevent him from revealing details on his invention, a computer security device utilizing a stream cipher. A rare public speech addressing communication security given by NSA director Bobby Ray Inman in 1979 saw him calling for an "open dialogue" between intelligence agencies and the academic world. This bizarrely resulted in many institutes of higher learning applying voluntary "prior restraint" to cryptographic research.In addition to this prior restraint on cryptographic inventions and research, the NSA further insinuated itself into the development process.We're at the point now where the NSA has 30+ years of "intercepting" cryptographic research, which gives it a head start when it comes to decrypting collected communication. Of course, the encryption method doesn't really matter if the NSA has already inserted itself into the communication stream at the pre-encryption point. And if it hasn't, it will just hold the data until it can crack it.The NSA has been in operation for over 60 years and its history shows it's always been prone to abuse, thanks to a minimum of oversight and a nearly impenetrable cloak of secrecy. Only now, six decades later, is it finally being forced to deal with the repercussions of its actions. But what's happening now is far too little way too late, thanks to a very compliant administration and two fawning intelligence committees.The only thing the last thirty years has brought the NSA is better, faster tools and techniques. And the efforts to rein in the agency haven't kept pace.

Filed Under: history, nsa, nsa surveillance