Azeh



Offline



Activity: 441

Merit: 500







Sr. MemberActivity: 441Merit: 500 Re: [ANN] BitcoinDark (BTCD)--Financial_Privacy/SuperNET_Core/InstantDEX/PAX/Divs December 30, 2015, 01:26:57 PM #9541 1000 BTCD Bounty for a Block Explorer task. This is for the BTCD chrome app (Iguana).



https://twitter.com/BitcoinDark/status/682155103713796097



Please join SuperNET slack and join the channel #iguana or #btcd and let us know if you are interested. Bounty for a Block Explorer task. This is for the BTCD chrome app (Iguana).Please join SuperNET slack and join the channel #iguana or #btcd and let us know if you are interested.

AWARD-WINNING

CASINO CRYPTO EXCLUSIVE

CLUBHOUSE 1500+

GAMES 2 MIN

CASH-OUTS 24/7

SUPPORT 100s OF

FREE SPINS PLAY NOW dvertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. dvertised sites are not endorsedby the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.

Azeh



Offline



Activity: 441

Merit: 500







Sr. MemberActivity: 441Merit: 500 Re: [ANN] BitcoinDark (BTCD)--Financial_Privacy/SuperNET_Core/InstantDEX/PAX/Divs December 31, 2015, 07:00:01 PM

Last edit: January 06, 2016, 02:38:50 PM by Azeh #9545 Week 31: 37 BTCD have been paid to 585 unique BitcoinDark addresses for successfully staking blocks 87044-884491



Thanks for staking and supporting the BitcoinDark network and Happy New Year!!!



bitkokos2



Offline



Activity: 666

Merit: 500







Hero MemberActivity: 666Merit: 500 Re: [ANN] BitcoinDark (BTCD)--Financial_Privacy/SuperNET_Core/InstantDEX/PAX/Divs December 31, 2015, 11:44:03 PM #9548







Any solution without having to reinstall the wallet and redownload the blockchain? Yesterday the windows wallet was functioning OK. Today, I get thisAny solution without having to reinstall the wallet and redownload the blockchain?

novirudarzg



Offline



Activity: 104

Merit: 10







MemberActivity: 104Merit: 10 Re: [ANN] BitcoinDark (BTCD)--Financial_Privacy/SuperNET_Core/InstantDEX/PAX/Divs January 01, 2016, 11:42:39 AM #9549 Quote from: bitkokos2 on December 31, 2015, 11:44:03 PM







Any solution without having to reinstall the wallet and redownload the blockchain?

Yesterday the windows wallet was functioning OK. Today, I get thisAny solution without having to reinstall the wallet and redownload the blockchain?



Happy i healthy you all in this new btcd year 1st post in 2016



@bitkokos -- i think there is no other way; but if anyone knows one - let us know (havent got that error for a while but you never know) Happy i healthy you all in this new btcd year1st post in 2016@bitkokos -- i think there is no other way; but if anyone knows one - let us know (havent got that error for a while but you never know)

bitkokos2



Offline



Activity: 666

Merit: 500







Hero MemberActivity: 666Merit: 500 Re: [ANN] BitcoinDark (BTCD)--Financial_Privacy/SuperNET_Core/InstantDEX/PAX/Divs January 01, 2016, 08:55:09 PM #9552 I thought restarting the computer might fix something, but, it didn't. It was last restarted 10 days ago.

I think I will go for the redownload. I Will try to find which country has the best nodes and use a VPN so I will download the blockchain faster.

l8orre



Offline



Activity: 1127

Merit: 1006







LegendaryActivity: 1127Merit: 1006 Re: [ANN] BitcoinDark (BTCD)--Financial_Privacy/SuperNET_Core/InstantDEX/PAX/Divs January 02, 2016, 08:39:18 AM #9555 Quote from: bitkokos2 on January 01, 2016, 10:47:26 PM Quote from: riceberry on January 01, 2016, 09:16:34 PM Soon we will be using ramchains in iguana, and then it will be even faster.



I do not use chrome and I do not intend to be using it.

I do not use chrome and I do not intend to be using it.

not that I'd want to praise google in any way- but what would be your reasons to not use chrome?



all browsers are trash, IMO, so why put chrome on the bottom of the list?



been waiting for an alternative, but they all have severe deficits.



maybe opera deserves another look after 10+ years, and maybe vivaldi could be ok, but as a platform, chrome gets its job done... not that I'd want to praise google in any way- but what would be your reasons to not use chrome?all browsers are trash, IMO, so why put chrome on the bottom of the list?been waiting for an alternative, but they all have severe deficits.maybe opera deserves another look after 10+ years, and maybe vivaldi could be ok, but as a platform, chrome gets its job done...

bitkokos2



Offline



Activity: 666

Merit: 500







Hero MemberActivity: 666Merit: 500 Re: [ANN] BitcoinDark (BTCD)--Financial_Privacy/SuperNET_Core/InstantDEX/PAX/Divs January 02, 2016, 12:04:21 PM

Last edit: January 02, 2016, 12:21:03 PM by bitkokos2 #9556 Quote from: l8orre on January 02, 2016, 08:39:18 AM Quote from: bitkokos2 on January 01, 2016, 10:47:26 PM Quote from: riceberry on January 01, 2016, 09:16:34 PM Soon we will be using ramchains in iguana, and then it will be even faster.



I do not use chrome and I do not intend to be using it.

I do not use chrome and I do not intend to be using it.

not that I'd want to praise google in any way- but what would be your reasons to not use chrome?



all browsers are trash, IMO, so why put chrome on the bottom of the list?



been waiting for an alternative, but they all have severe deficits.



maybe opera deserves another look after 10+ years, and maybe vivaldi could be ok, but as a platform, chrome gets its job done...

not that I'd want to praise google in any way- but what would be your reasons to not use chrome?all browsers are trash, IMO, so why put chrome on the bottom of the list?been waiting for an alternative, but they all have severe deficits.maybe opera deserves another look after 10+ years, and maybe vivaldi could be ok, but as a platform, chrome gets its job done...

I am avoiding google as much as I can.

I have an android phone just for some apps. I have never placed my sim card inside, never used it to check my emails etc.

Google is trying to get as much private information as it can from users.

With an android phone google has access to your position, your email, text messages, calls, your credit card, etc.

They have even agreed that even your voice while you are not even using the phone can go to their servers (if you use apps to communicate with your phone with your voice)

I just do not trust google. That's it!

And one thing I didn't like is the decision to use BTCD with chrome.

You can't be anonymous on a spy.

I am avoiding google as much as I can.I have an android phone just for some apps. I have never placed my sim card inside, never used it to check my emails etc.Google is trying to get as much private information as it can from users.With an android phone google has access to your position, your email, text messages, calls, your credit card, etc.They have even agreed that even your voice while you are not even using the phone can go to their servers (if you use apps to communicate with your phone with your voice)I just do not trust google. That's it!And one thing I didn't like is the decision to use BTCD with chrome.You can't be anonymous on a spy.

l8orre



Offline



Activity: 1127

Merit: 1006







LegendaryActivity: 1127Merit: 1006 Re: [ANN] BitcoinDark (BTCD)--Financial_Privacy/SuperNET_Core/InstantDEX/PAX/Divs January 02, 2016, 01:26:06 PM #9557 Quote from: bitkokos2 on January 02, 2016, 12:04:21 PM



I am avoiding google as much as I can.

I have an android phone just for some apps. I have never placed my sim card inside, never used it to check my emails etc.

Google is trying to get as much private information as it can from users.

With an android phone google has access to your position, your email, text messages, calls, your credit card, etc.

They have even agreed that even your voice while you are not even using the phone can go to their servers (if you use apps to communicate with your phone with your voice)

I just do not trust google. That's it!

And one thing I didn't like is the decision to use BTCD with chrome.

You can't be anonymous on a spy.



I am avoiding google as much as I can.I have an android phone just for some apps. I have never placed my sim card inside, never used it to check my emails etc.Google is trying to get as much private information as it can from users.With an android phone google has access to your position, your email, text messages, calls, your credit card, etc.They have even agreed that even your voice while you are not even using the phone can go to their servers (if you use apps to communicate with your phone with your voice)I just do not trust google. That's it!And one thing I didn't like is the decision to use BTCD with chrome.You can't be anonymous on a spy.

agreed.



especially super filthy: the thing with the activating the microphnoes and routing everything to their servers.



Hey- I do not even own an Android device, and never have. If it must be such a 'smart'phone or mobile device, I'd be giving Sailfish a try.



I amusing chrome on Ubuntu, and I don't trust it very much either. The only reason to do that is that it is less bloated than Firefox.



But for mass adoption of BTCD/SuperNET, a standalone chrome app is a good option, because accessing the gigantic user base is a major achievement.



And for the tech and privacy aware, I am fairly sure that a standalone Iguana without chrome is also available- which I will be using for sure, instead of a chrome app... agreed.especially super filthy: the thing with the activating the microphnoes and routing everything to their servers.Hey- I do not even own an Android device, and never have. If it must be such a 'smart'phone or mobile device, I'd be giving Sailfish a try.I amusing chrome on Ubuntu, and I don't trust it very much either. The only reason to do that is that it is less bloated than Firefox.But for mass adoption of BTCD/SuperNET, a standalone chrome app is a good option, because accessing the gigantic user base is a major achievement.And for the tech and privacy aware, I am fairly sure that a standalone Iguanachrome is also available- which I will be using for sure, instead of a chrome app...

jl777



Offline



Activity: 1176

Merit: 1090







LegendaryActivity: 1176Merit: 1090 Re: [ANN] BitcoinDark (BTCD)--Financial_Privacy/SuperNET_Core/InstantDEX/PAX/Divs January 02, 2016, 01:53:42 PM #9558 the same codebase can certainly generate a native iguana

for now only for unix and osx, but if somebody can port a few functions to windows and do the build, it should even work natively in windows.



James http://www.digitalcatallaxy.com/report2015.html

100+ page annual report for SuperNET 100+ page annual report for SuperNET

riceberry



Offline



Activity: 487

Merit: 500









Hero MemberActivity: 487Merit: 500 Re: [ANN] BitcoinDark (BTCD)--Financial_Privacy/SuperNET_Core/InstantDEX/PAX/Divs January 02, 2016, 02:42:24 PM #9559 Quote from: l8orre on January 02, 2016, 01:26:06 PM Quote from: bitkokos2 on January 02, 2016, 12:04:21 PM



I am avoiding google as much as I can.

I have an android phone just for some apps. I have never placed my sim card inside, never used it to check my emails etc.

Google is trying to get as much private information as it can from users.

With an android phone google has access to your position, your email, text messages, calls, your credit card, etc.

They have even agreed that even your voice while you are not even using the phone can go to their servers (if you use apps to communicate with your phone with your voice)

I just do not trust google. That's it!

And one thing I didn't like is the decision to use BTCD with chrome.

You can't be anonymous on a spy.



I am avoiding google as much as I can.I have an android phone just for some apps. I have never placed my sim card inside, never used it to check my emails etc.Google is trying to get as much private information as it can from users.With an android phone google has access to your position, your email, text messages, calls, your credit card, etc.They have even agreed that even your voice while you are not even using the phone can go to their servers (if you use apps to communicate with your phone with your voice)I just do not trust google. That's it!And one thing I didn't like is the decision to use BTCD with chrome.You can't be anonymous on a spy.

agreed.



especially super filthy: the thing with the activating the microphnoes and routing everything to their servers.



Hey- I do not even own an Android device, and never have. If it must be such a 'smart'phone or mobile device, I'd be giving Sailfish a try.



I amusing chrome on Ubuntu, and I don't trust it very much either. The only reason to do that is that it is less bloated than Firefox.



But for mass adoption of BTCD/SuperNET, a standalone chrome app is a good option, because accessing the gigantic user base is a major achievement.



And for the tech and privacy aware, I am fairly sure that a standalone Iguana without chrome is also available- which I will be using for sure, instead of a chrome app...

agreed.especially super filthy: the thing with the activating the microphnoes and routing everything to their servers.Hey- I do not even own an Android device, and never have. If it must be such a 'smart'phone or mobile device, I'd be giving Sailfish a try.I amusing chrome on Ubuntu, and I don't trust it very much either. The only reason to do that is that it is less bloated than Firefox.But for mass adoption of BTCD/SuperNET, a standalone chrome app is a good option, because accessing the gigantic user base is a major achievement.And for the tech and privacy aware, I am fairly sure that a standalone Iguanachrome is also available- which I will be using for sure, instead of a chrome app...

What about using Chromium, it lacks the closed source parts that chrome has. I'm pretty sure Chromium can run chrome apps too. Correct me if I'm wrong. What about using Chromium, it lacks the closed source parts that chrome has. I'm pretty sure Chromium can run chrome apps too. Correct me if I'm wrong.