Article content

HALIFAX — A Conservative party policy debate ended in conflict on Friday as dozens of people failed to have their views on supply management heard.

On Thursday, Maxime Bernier said Conservatives’ support for supply management was one of the reasons he was quitting caucus and forming a new party. Ending the system that puts quotas on the production of dairy, eggs and milk, and limits their import with tariffs, was his biggest promise to members during last year’s leadership race.

We apologize, but this video has failed to load.

tap here to see other videos from our team. Try refreshing your browser, or After supply management cut from debate at Conservative convention, some members ponder backing Bernier Back to video

After the kerfuffle on the convention floor, several young delegates told the National Post they were now more likely to consider supporting Bernier.

At a convention centre in downtown Halifax, three groups of delegates had been handling 76 resolutions to alter the party’s policy book. Two of the groups were able to deal with 24 and 26 resolutions, respectively, within the three hours allotted.

The third group, which started late, did not get all the way down its list. At 4:30 p.m. local time, the chair tried to wrap up. But several resolutions, including the last — which sought to phase out supply management — had not been addressed.

This raised the ire of several dozen delegates. Some yelled, “shame,” and one man went to the microphone to say, “you’re driving us out of the party.”

Alberta MP Garnett Genuis went to the microphone to advocate that the party stick to the rules despite outstanding resolutions. After hearing his argument, the chair called a vote on whether to continue. The majority were in favour of wrapping up, although about 30 people wanted to extend the debate.

“The process is that the ranking and the order is determined based on online voting that happens by members before the convention. And that’s to make sure that the things members are most interested in discussing are discussed earlier,” Genuis said later. The process doesn’t always work the way people want, but it’s “well-designed” because it reflects the wishes of members.

“If people want to discuss a particular issue, then they need to work a little harder next time to get people to vote for it in the online process that happens beforehand,” he added.