Lähdeviitteet

Ahvenniemi, E., Akbashev, A. R., Ali, S., Bechelany, M., Berdova, M., Boyadjiev, S., ... Yurkevich, O. (2016). Review article: recommended reading list of early publications on atomic layer deposition—outcome of the “Virtual Project on the History of ALD”. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.1116/1.4971389

Ala-Kyyny, J., Korhonen, T., & Roinila, M. (2017). Tutkimusdatan avaamisen esteet: Haastattelututkimus helsingin yliopistossa. Signum, 49(4), 25–29. https://doi.org/10.25033/sig.69198

Aleksic, J., Alexa, A., Attwood, T. K., Chue Hong, N., Dahlö, M., Davey, R., ... Vieira, B. M. (2015). An open science peer review oath. F1000Research, 3, 271. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.5686.2

Ali-Khan, S. E., Harris, L. W., & Gold, E. R. (2017). Point of view: Motivating participation in open science by examining researcher incentives. eLife, 6, e29319. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.29319

All European Academies ALLEA, E. S. F. E. &. (2011). The european code of conduct for research integrity. https://www.allea.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Code_Conduct_ResearchIntegrity.pdf

Baden, T., Chagas, A. M., Gage, G., Marzullo, T., Prieto-Godino, L. L., & Euler, T. (2015). Open labware: 3-d printing your own lab equipment. PLOS Biology, 13(3), e1002086. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002086

Bartling, S., & Friesike, S. (eds.). (2014a). Opening science: The evolving guide on how the internet is changing research, collaboration and scholarly publishing. Heidelberg: Springer Open. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8

Bartling, S., & Friesike, S. (2014b). Towards another scientific revolution. In S. Bartling & S. Friesike (eds.), Opening science: The evolving guide on how the internet is changing research, collaboration and scholarly publishing (pp. 3–15). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_1

Brownell, S. E., Price, J. V., & Steinman, L. (2013). Science communication to the general public: Why we need to teach undergraduate and graduate students this skill as part of their formal scientific training. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 12(1), E6–E10. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3852879/

Bullock, M., & Panicker, S. (2003). Ethics for all: Differences across scientific society codes. Science and Engineering Ethics, 9(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-003-0003-3

Crosas, M. (2013). Joint declaration of data citation principles. FORCE11. https://www.force11.org/datacitationprinciples

David, P. A. (2013). The historical origins of ’open science’: An essay on patronage, reputation and common agency contracting in the scientific revolution. Capitalism and Society, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-0213.1040

Dobbs, D. (2012). Is the open science revolution for real? Wired. https://www.wired.com/2012/02/is-the-open-science-revolution-for-real/

DORA – san francisco declaration on research assessment. (2012). https://sfdora.org/

Draft European open science agenda. (2016). https://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/pdf/draft_european_open_science_agenda.pdf

Drenth, P. J. D. (2006). Responsible conduct in research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(1), 13–21. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/PL00022265

Eisfeld-Reschke, J., Herb, U., & Wenzlaff, K. (2014). Research funding in open science. In S. Bartling & S. Friesike (eds.), Opening science: The evolving guide on how the internet is changing research, collaboration and scholarly publishing (pp. 237–253). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_16

Elliott, K. C. (2017). An introduction to values in science. In A tapestry of values: An introduction to values in science (pp. 1–18). New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190260804.003.0001

Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008).The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x

European Commission. (2016). H2020 Programme Guidelines on FAIR Data Management in Horizon 2020. European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/hi/oa_pilot/h2020-hi-oa-data-mgt_en.pdf

European Commission. (n.d.). Trends for open access to publications. European Commission - European Commission. Text. https://ec.europa.eu/info/research-and-innovation/strategy/goals-research-and-innovation-policy/open-science/open-science-monitor/trends-open-access-publications_en

Fecher, B., & Friesike, S. (2014). Open science: One term, five schools of thought. In S. Bartling & S. Friesike (eds.), Opening science: The evolving guide on how the internet is changing research, collaboration and scholarly publishing (pp. 17–47). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_2

Finland, O. K. (2016). Open citizen science. https://fi.okfn.org/projects/open-citizen-science/

Finnish Committee for Research Data. (2018). Tracing data: Data citation roadmap for finland. Finnish Committee for Research Data. http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe201804106446

Funk, C., & Rainie, L. (2015). Public and scientists’ views on science and society | pew research center. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/01/29/public-and-scientists-views-on-science-and-society/

Giorgini, V., Mecca, J. T., Gibson, C., Medeiros, K., Mumford, M. D., Connelly, S., & Devenport, L. D. (2015). Researcher perceptions of ethical guidelines and codes of conduct. Accountability in Research, 22(3), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2014.955607

Godecharle, S., Nemery, B., & Dierickx, K. (2013). Guidance on research integrity: No union in europe. The Lancet, 381(9872), 1097–1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60759-X

Godecharle, S., Nemery, B., & Dierickx, K. (2014). Heterogeneity in european research integrity guidance: Relying on values or norms? Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9(3), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264614540594

Irwin, A. (1995). Citizen science : A study of people, expertise and sustainable development. New York, NY, USA: Routledge.

Kaiser, M. (1999). Development of international guidelines for research ethics: A commentary on ”scientific misconduct: Present problems and future trends”(b. Mishkin). Science and Engineering Ethics, 5(2), 293–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-999-0021-x

Karjalainen, S., Launis, V., Pelkonen, R., & Pietarinen, J. (eds.). (2002). Tutkijan eettiset valinnat. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.

Kuhn, T. S. (1964). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.

Laine, H. (2017). Afraid of scooping – case study on researcher strategies against fear of scooping in the context of open science. Data Science Journal, 16(0), 29. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2017-029

Laine, H. (2018). Open co-authorship of scientific articles. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1302235

Lategan, L. O. K. (2015). Software for academic integrity: The role of research codes, statements and declarations in research ethics and integrity. In Integrity in the global research arena (1st ed., pp. 165–176). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814632393_0021

Löfström, E. (2012). Students’ ethical awareness and conceptions of research ethics. Ethics & Behavior, 22(5), 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2012.679136

Löppönen, P., Mäkelä, P. H., & Paunio, K. (eds.). (1991). Tiede ja etiikka. Porvoo: W. Söderström.

Löppönen, P., & Vuorio, E. (2013). Tutkimusetiikka suomessa 1980-luvulta tähän päivään. Tieteessä Tapahtuu, 31(1), 3.

Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science : Theoretical and empirical investigations. University of Chicago Press.

Ministère de l’Enseignement supérieur, de la Recherche et de l’Innovation. (2018). Le plan national pour la science ouverte. Ministère de l’Enseignement supérieur, de la Recherche et de l’Innovation. m.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/cid132529/le-plan-national-pour-la-science-ouverte-les-resultats-de-la-recherche-scientifique-ouverts-a-tous-sans-entrave-sans-delai-sans-paiement.html

Mwaka, E. S. (2017). Responsible conduct of research: Enhancing local opportunities. African Health Sciences, 17(2), 584–590–590. https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v17i2.36

Nieminen, R., Bargum, K., Karvonen, E., Väliverronen, E., & Ruuska, M. (2018). Bold communication, responsible influence. Science communication recommendations. The Committee for Public Information. https://www.tjnk.fi/sites/tjnk.fi/files/recom_scicommunication_2018.pdf

Nosek, B. A., Alter, G., Banks, G. C., Borsboom, D., Bowman, S. D., Breckler, S. J., ... Yarkoni, T. (2015). Promoting an open research culture. Science, 348(6242), 1422–1425. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab2374

O’Carroll, C., Rentier, B., Cabello Valdes, C., Esposito, F., Kaunismaa, E., Maas, K., ... Vandelvelde, K. (2017). Evaluation of research careers fully acknowledging open science practices rewards, incentives and/or recognition for researchers practicing open science. European Commission Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. https://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/pdf/os_rewards_wgreport_final.pdf

Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716

Palacin-Silva, M., Seffah, A., Heikkinen, K., Porras, J., Pyhälahti, T., Sucksdorff, Y., ... Junttila, S. (2016). State-of-the art study in citizen observatories: Technological trends, development challenges and research avenues. Finnish Environment Institute. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/164810

Pontika, N., Knoth, P., Cancellieri, M., & Pearce, S. (2015). Fostering open science to research using a taxonomy and an eLearning portal. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on knowledge technologies and data-driven business(pp. 11:1–11:8). New York, NY, USA: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2809563.2809571

Powell, A. (2012). Democratizing production through open source knowledge: From open software to open hardware. Media, Culture & Society, 34(6), 691–708. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443712449497

Rappert, B. (2007). Codes of conduct and biological weapons: An in-process assessment. Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science, 5(2), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1089/bsp.2007.0003

Räsänen, L., & Moore, E. (2016). Critical evaluation of the guidelines of the finnish advisory board on research integrity and of their application. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 1(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-016-0020-9

Research Integrity, W. C. on. (2011). Singapore statement on research integrity. https://wcrif.org/guidance/singapore-statement

Resnik, D. B. (1998). The ethics of science : An introduction. Routledge.

Resnik, D. B., Rasmussen, L. M., & Kissling, G. E. (2015). An international study of research misconduct policies. Accountability in Research, 22(5), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2014.958218

Rossouw, T. M., Zyl, C. van, & Pope, A. (2014). Responsible conduct of research: Global trends, local opportunities. South African Journal of Science, 110(1/2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1590/sajs.2014/20130103

Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences. (2013). Responsible research data management and the prevention of scientific misconduct: Advisory report. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences. https://www.knaw.nl/en/actueel/publicaties/responsible-research-data-management-and-the-prevention-of-scientific-misconduct/@@download/pdf_file/20131009.pdf

Salmi, J. (n.d.). Study on open science: Impact, implications and policy options (vol. 2015). European Commission Directorate-General for Research and Innovation Directorate RTD. https://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/pdf/expert-groups/rise/study_on_open_science-impact_implications_and_policy_options-salmi_072015.pdf

Schuurbiers, D., Osseweijer, P., & Kinderlerer, J. (2009). Implementing the netherlands code of conduct for scientific practice—a case study. Science and Engineering Ethics, 15(2), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-009-9114-9

Sieber, J. E. (1994). Scientists’ responses to ethical issues in research. In W. R. Shadish & S. Fuller (eds.), The social psychology of science. New York: Guilford Press.

Smith, E., Gunashekar, S., Parks, S., Lichten, C., Lepetit, L., Morgan Jones, M., & Van Der Peijl, S. (n.d.). Open science monitoring: Impact case study – polymath. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/pdf/monitor/polymath_case_study.pdf

Steneck, N., Anderson, M., Kleinert, S., & Mayer, T. (eds.). (2015). Integrity in the global research arena. WORLD SCIENTIFIC. https://doi.org/10.1142/9369

Stevens, M., Vitos, M., Altenbuchner, J., Conquest, G., Lewis, J., & Haklay, M. (2014). Taking participatory citizen science to extremes. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 13(2), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2014.37

Stroebe, W., & Strack, F. (2014).The alleged crisis and the illusion of exact replication. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613514450

Suber, P. (2012). Open access. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

UNIFI. (2018). Avoin tiede ja data. Toimenpideohjelma suomalaiselle tiedeyhteisölle. Universities Finland UNIFI. http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2018052424593

van Wezenbeek, W. J. S. M., Touwen, H. J. J., Versteeg, A. M. C., & van Wesenbeeck, A. (2017). Nationaal plan open science. https://doi.org/10.4233/uuid:9e9fa82e-06c1-4d0d-9e20-5620259a6c65

Vasconcelos, S. M. R., Sorenson, M. M., Watanabe, E. H., Foguel, D., Palácios, M., Vasconcelos, S. M. R., ... Palácios, M. (2015). Brazilian science and research integrity: Where are we? What next? Anais Da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 87(2), 1259–1269. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201520150165

Vicente-Saez, R., & Martinez-Fuentes, C. (2018). Open science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition. Journal of Business Research, 88, 428–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.043

Whyte, A., & Pryor, G. (2011). Open science in practice: Researcher perspectives and participation | international journal of digital curation. International Journal of Digital Curation, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v6i1.182

Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A.,... Mons, B. (2016). The fair guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18

Williams, S. (2002). Free as in freedom: Richard Stallman’s crusade for free software. O’Reilly Media.