WikiLeaks, not surprisingly, has gone on the defensive in light of the report. It asserts that the AP story is "ridiculous," a "re-run" of a 2015 story that's pointless when the Saudi government already has the details. The group is also floating a conspiracy theory, suggesting that US journalists are trying to discredit its activities now that it has published emails tarnishing the Democratic National Committee and "presumptive winner" Hillary Clinton.

It's true that WikiLeaks didn't leak the Saudi cables itself (it just made them easier to search), and AKP party data that contained sensitive Turkish voting info was uploaded by someone else (who has since deleted it). Many of the details aren't new, for that matter. Even so, the report still isn't flattering -- it contradicts Assange's promises of a "harm minimization policy" that protects medical records and other private details that aren't necessary for exposing government corruption and overreach. However much good WikiLeaks might be doing, it's not being very discriminate in what it allows on its site.