lynx29 yep I am very surprised honestly, just hope AMD can hammer out better drivers, because even if they can beat Nvidia next round, if I can't launch any and every game I want with 0 issues... not going to bother. I hope they can pull it off.

Anymal Nvidia throws more money in developers.

1d10t Yeah, AMD bad at driver , but how many of them died within months ? :rolleyes:

There is an elephant in the room; Nvidia is expected to launch their 7nm Turing successor sometime in 2020, and if AMD finally launches a "RTX 2080 competitor" in 2020, then it's going to be too little too late once again.AMD need to catch up in the GPU market, and not by waiting and hoping for the competition to "screw up".Yes, AMD's driver quality is nowhere close to Nvidia's unfortunately. Whether or not this matters is up to the end users. But despite AMD having fewer resources than Nvidia, they could prioritize and get this solved. AMD have hundreds of engineers working on "optimizing" for games (which means manipulating shaders, etc.) to squeeze out that ~2% extra, while they should be focusing on making the best drivers ever. Even Nvidia's drivers is not perfect, so there is plenty of room for improvement.Due to the consoles, there are far more AMD sponsored titles.Feeding the conspiracy theories again?A few cards being DoA, and a failure rate of 2-5% is completely normal, and Turing is below that. Most of the reported problems were later dismissed as driver bugs (which were also fixed), and only a few cards were actually defective.