Former Vice President Joe Biden Joe BidenSenate Republicans face tough decision on replacing Ginsburg What Senate Republicans have said about election-year Supreme Court vacancies Biden says Ginsburg successor should be picked by candidate who wins on Nov. 3 MORE called for revoking a key legal protection for online companies in an interview with The New York Times released Friday.

The presidential hopeful railed against Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which gives platforms legal immunity for content posted by third-party users while also giving them legal cover to take good-faith efforts to moderate their platforms, when asked about his concerns with Facebook.

"[The Times] can’t write something you know to be false and be exempt from being sued. But he can," Biden told the Times editorial board, referring to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg Mark Elliot ZuckerbergHillicon Valley: Trump's ban on TikTok, WeChat in spotlight | NASA targeted by foreign hackers | Instagram accused of spying in lawsuit The Hill's Morning Report - Sponsored by The Air Line Pilots Association - Trump contradicts CDC director on vaccine, masks Hillicon Valley: DOJ indicts Chinese, Malaysian hackers accused of targeting over 100 organizations | GOP senators raise concerns over Oracle-TikTok deal | QAnon awareness jumps in new poll MORE.

ADVERTISEMENT

"The idea that it’s a tech company is that Section 230 should be revoked, immediately should be revoked, number one. For Zuckerberg and other platforms."

Biden's firm stance against the legal protection breaks with the other Democratic nomination contenders, some of whom have been critical of the law but none of whom have called for it to be "revoked."

"It should be revoked because it is not merely an internet company," Biden said when pressed about the importance of the law. "It is propagating falsehoods they know to be false, and we should be setting standards not unlike the Europeans are doing relative to privacy."

His comments suggest that Biden may want to revoke protections from Facebook, rather than removing the law entirely. The Hill has reached out to Biden's campaign for clarification.

As president, Biden would not be able to unilaterally remove Section 230. His comments suggest, however, that he would be willing to expend political capital to press Congress into acting on the internet law.

ADVERTISEMENT

Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have increasingly raised concerns about the statute, floating potential amendments to it. Sen. Josh Hawley Joshua (Josh) David HawleyRenewed focus on Trump's Supreme Court list after Ginsburg's death What Facebook's planned change to its terms of service means for the Section 230 debate Republican Senators raise concerns over Oracle-TikTok deal MORE (R-Mo.) introduced legislation last year that would require platforms prove they are politically "neutral" before receiving Section 230 protections.

Former Rep. Beto O'Rourke Beto O'RourkeJimmy Carter says his son smoked pot with Willie Nelson on White House roof O'Rourke endorses Kennedy for Senate: 'A champion for the values we're most proud of' 2020 Democrats do convention Zoom call MORE (D-Texas), who suspended his presidential campaign last year, was the first Democratic contender to defend making changes to Section 230 as part of his platform.

This is not the first time Biden has criticized Section 230 protections in the context of Facebook.

"I, for one, think we should be considering taking away [Facebook's] exemption that they cannot be sued for knowingly engaged on, in promoting something that's not true," he told CNN in November.

Joe Biden: "I, for one, think we should be considering taking away [Facebook's] exemption that they cannot be sued for knowingly engaged on, in promoting something that's not true." pic.twitter.com/p8Moh2fyJy — The Hill (@thehill) November 12, 2019

Biden has been increasingly critical of Facebook since the platform declined to remove an ad run by President Trump Donald John TrumpObama calls on Senate not to fill Ginsburg's vacancy until after election Planned Parenthood: 'The fate of our rights' depends on Ginsburg replacement Progressive group to spend M in ad campaign on Supreme Court vacancy MORE's reelection campaign accusing the former vice president of using his office to pressure Ukrainian officials to drop an investigation into Burisma. His son Hunter Biden sat on the board of the company.

Facebook has since defended its policy to not fact-check political ads several times, essentially allowing politicians to lie on its platform with limited exceptions.

The social media giant declined to comment on Biden's comments to the Times, but pointed The Hill to testimony from Facebook's vice president of global policy management Monika Bickert last week.

When asked about Section 230 by Sen. Roy Blunt Roy Dean BluntCDC tells Congress it urgently needs billion for vaccine distribution On The Money: Trump undercuts GOP, calls for bigger COVID-19 relief package | Communities of color hit hardest financially by COVID-19 | Businesses, states pass on Trump payroll tax deferral Trump undercuts GOP, calls for bigger COVID-19 relief package MORE (R-Mo.), Bickert described it as an "important part of my team being able to do what we do" which "gives us the ability to proactively look for abuse and remove it."