Fox News resident anti-President Donald Trump talking heads Judge Andrew Napolitano and Bret Baier are on the attack again.

The two spoke after Special Counsel Robert Mueller gave a statement on Wednesday in which he explained there was no collusion.

“This was not – as the president says time and time again – no collusion, no obstruction. It was much more nuanced than that,” Baier said.

“He said specifically they couldn’t find evidence to move forward with the crime of collusion for the investigation of the Trump campaign.

“He said specifically if they had found that the president did not commit a crime on obstruction, they would have said that, and then went into specific details about the DOJ policy and why they couldn’t move forward with anything else than their decision.”

TRENDING: Shock Video Shows Black Lives Matter Protesters Segregating Themselves by Race and Gender

“It was not anywhere as clear-cut as Attorney General Bill Barr. In fact, it was almost exactly the opposite: not clear-cut.,” he said.

Apparently Baier is unfamiliar with the American principle of innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

If American citizens charged with a crime had to rely on a prosecutor to find them innocent then there would not be anyone found innocent.

Napolitano said that for the Democrats Mueller’s speech “opens the door for the Democrats the pounce” on impeachment.

Should they work for CNN? Yes No Completing this poll entitles you to our news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You're logged in to Facebook. Click here to log out. 91% (703 Votes) 9% (72 Votes)

He said that Muelle’s message was “We had evidence that he [Trump] committed a crime, but we couldn’t charge him because he’s the President of the United States.”

“This statement is 180 degrees from the 4-page statement Bill Barr issued at the time he first saw the report,” he said.

Napolitano said that Mueller’s speech was a “parting shot” because “he didn’t say there was no conspiracy, he just said we were not able to establish it beyond a reasonable doubt.”

In other words he did what every prosecutor in the United States is supposed to do. If you could prove a crime prove it, otherwise there is no crime.

Fox's Judge Napolitano on Mueller's statement: "The evidence he laid out is remarkably similar to the impeachment charges against Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton" https://t.co/29iS9OaZkW — Mike Walker (@New_Narrative) May 29, 2019

Napolitano: Mueller’s statement is not good news for Trump https://t.co/UGixLj7BC2 pic.twitter.com/dGeDFdpoRf — PoliticTalks – Politics News and Politic Chat (@politic_talks) May 29, 2019

Napolitano: "This was not good news for the president because he has ginned up all the Democrats to believe there must be a 'there' there, and it was a parting shot at…Bill Barr, who basically whitewashed what Mueller said in the four-page summary he distributed back in March." pic.twitter.com/zMMawoseTy — Frank Dale (@fwdale) May 29, 2019

Today on Fox News State Media regarding Mueller’s statement??? Brett Baier: “It was not anywhere as clear-cut as Bill Barr. It was almost exactly the opposite.” Judge Napolitano: Mueller “had evidence he committed a crime… This is 180* from the statement Bill Barr issued.” pic.twitter.com/iqbtlXVN3S — Bryan Dawson (@BryanDawsonUSA) May 29, 2019

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1133753555691671552`

Bret Baier on Fox after Mueller's newser: "This was not, as the president says time and time again, no collusion, no obstruction … It was not anywhere as clear-cut as Attorney General Bill Barr— in fact, it was almost exactly the opposite: not clear-cut." pic.twitter.com/aBMcvfuxEV — Kyle Griffin (@kylegriffin1) May 29, 2019