Hey there, time traveller!

This article was published 28/8/2018 (759 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.

Opinion

In 2010, Canada’s health ministers stated in a Declaration on Prevention and Promotion that "the promotion of health and the prevention of disease, disability and injury are a priority and necessary to the sustainability of the health system." So, you would think that public health would be a clear priority in Canada’s health-care system. However, Canada’s governments have not acted in accordance with those fine words.

Public health is the only part of the health care system that is wholly concerned with preventing death, disease and injury. While most apparent in infectious disease control, it plays a leading role in the fight against tobacco, chronic diseases, obesity, injury, substance abuse, addictions and mental disorders. Not only does public health improve the health of the population, it is one of the best ways to sustain our publicly funded health-care system.

On average in 2015, the health-care system consumed 37 per cent of provincial program expenditures, a proportion that all provinces are struggling to contain. Because as health-care funding’s share of the budget increases, it squeezes other sectors whose contributions to health and well-being are just as important: housing, education, social services and others.

There is only so much the provinces can do to reduce the cost of health care through efficiencies before they have to reduce services and access. But there is a better way: reduce the burden of disease, which is the work of public health. In addition, there are significant economic benefits from prevention, not only from avoided health-care costs but in avoided loss of production, income and tax revenue.

Public health is being weakened across Canada. As it is, it receives only three to four per cent of health-care funding, and in some provinces and health authorities, much less. Public health funding in Nova Scotia is among the lowest in the country, at 1.5 per cent of health-care spending in 2010-11. Quebec’s regional public health units were hit by severe budget cuts of 33 per cent in 2015, while the British Columbia auditor general reported last year that while all the care sectors within the system had increases in funding between 2012-13 and 2015-16, public health funding actually decreased.

It is not only a matter of funding. Recent editorials and commentaries in the Canadian Journal of Public Health have pointed to other problems, including downgrading the status of public health within governments and health authorities, eroding the independence of medical officers of health and limiting the scope of public health.

Meanwhile, nationally, the chief public health officer for Canada was downgraded by the Harper government from leading the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) to being little more than an adviser to the president of PHAC. Inexplicably, the Liberal government — which established the agency in 2004 — has failed to reverse this change in status and authority.

So significant is the crisis facing public health that last year, Canada’s Chief Medical officers of Health wrote in the Canadian Medical Association Journal imploring "health ministers to reaffirm commitment to the principles outlined in the declaration."

Public health cannot fulfill its vitally important role with one hand tied behind its back. Our health care system depends upon a strong public health sector. Canada’s governments need to make public health a priority.

Trevor Hancock is a retired professor of public health at the University of Victoria. Art Eggleton is chairman of the senate standing committee on social affairs, science and technology.