Prof. Pamela Karlan is a hero to liberals today after her testimony before the House Judiciary Committee. They were thrilled with her unbiased, no-nonsense, straight-down-the-middle stance on President Trump’s impeachment … right.

As Twitchy noted, Rep. Matt Gaetz had the opportunity to ask the four law professors if any one of them had “any personal knowledge of a single material fact in the Schiff report,” and of course, none of the “witnesses” raised their hand.

As CNN saw it, Republican Congressman Gaetz was attempting to paint Karlan as a liberal elite with his questioning. You could almost say he pounced on her testimony.

During Wednesday's impeachment hearing, GOP Rep. Matt Gaetz attempted to paint Stanford Law professor Pamela Karlan as a liberal elite biased against conservatives https://t.co/CprFRLPuDt — CNN (@CNN) December 4, 2019

CNN reports:

In his questioning, Gaetz attempted to paint Karlan as a liberal elite biased against conservatives. Gaetz first noted that Karlan had previously given money to Democrats, including $1,200 to Barack Obama, $2,000 to Hillary Clinton and $1,000 to Elizabeth Warren. Karlan did not dispute these figures, but later noted that she has a constitutional right protected by the First Amendment to give money to candidates. Gaetz then pressed Karlan over her appearance at an event affiliated with a podcast called Versus Trump, during which she said that conservatives generally spread out, geographically, “perhaps because they don’t even want to be around themselves,” Gaetz noted.

It’s a good thing Gaetz failed in his attempt, or else people might have thought that the Stanford law professor really was a liberal elite with contempt for conservatives.

aaaaaaaaaand, he succeeded. — angelo biz (@bizman86) December 4, 2019

She did a fine job of proving him to be correct. — Mr. Mooch (@mmooch1970) December 4, 2019

So, he told the truth?? — 'That' guy. (@Wil_The_Thrill2) December 4, 2019

He succeeded. — Shelli Green (@shelligreen) December 4, 2019

He only had to let her talk. https://t.co/DrvufVOdNY — jeffswarens (@jeffswarens) December 4, 2019

He could of easily done that by sitting there quietly listening to her bark. — Shawn Belleque (@sbelleque) December 4, 2019

You misspelled "accurately described what was obvious to everyone paying attention". https://t.co/9riCtwiREM — Dodd (@Amuk3) December 4, 2019

Um, she is lol — Justin Matt ⚾️ (@dezcaughtitslim) December 4, 2019

Easy to paint that picture. — tokdoc (@Tokdoc) December 4, 2019

She did a pretty good job of that herself, wouldn’t ya say? — The Cool Brian (@SplitElement) December 4, 2019

He did a damn good job. Thank you @mattgaetz — Yasmina Rip ✝️?? (@yasminarippel) December 4, 2019

Attempted?! She basically silenced with one question. She had no reply. Facts matter. Not feelings. — jerome ierome (@jierome77) December 4, 2019

I think she painted that picture all by herself! — Jeff (@JeffGravis) December 4, 2019

He didn’t attempt. He did. Lmao. — sbm (@bmr757) December 4, 2019

I think she did it all herself. https://t.co/yLuuUl2OIX — Fra Gee Lay A ??? (@anewjusta) December 4, 2019

She is tho. https://t.co/l78mgHlz87 — Evil Red Kid (@_SOURKIDZ_) December 4, 2019

That crazy old hag is on record saying she couldn't walk by the Trump hotel. https://t.co/vRNKrGeP9i — Happy fall ya'll (@Belindahenry18) December 4, 2019

Her mocking a 13 year old child's name because she dislikes Orange Man did that more than he ever could https://t.co/ZrbO4BonBa — Big T Larrity (@WilliamVenomous) December 4, 2019

Attempted …. Hell he painted with a roller — Jeff riley (@RileyJwriley14) December 4, 2019

And left her holding it — John Regan ??????????? (@jregan11) December 4, 2019

Wow, after watching this clip, we’re beginning to wonder if Karlan really is biased against conservatives:

Professor Karlan hates straight white men pic.twitter.com/GVKUT7ZaHE — Legal Immigrant Cult Member (@1776Legal) December 4, 2019

Related: