This email has also been verified by Google DKIM 2048-bit RSA key

Re: HRC and DMR

+ Rob to proof and post once this is locked. I think it's great. On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Troy Price <tprice@hillaryclinton.com> wrote: > Love it. Let me know when it's out and I will send around to our > endorsers/influencers. > > Troy > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Feb 4, 2016, at 9:23 PM, Elias, Marc (Perkins Coie) < > MElias@perkinscoie.com> wrote: > > > Excellent. > > > -- > Marc E. Elias > Perkins Coie LLP > 700 13th St, NW > Washington, DC 20005 > 202-434-1609 > > melias@perkinscoie.com > > @marceelias <https://twitter.com/marceelias> > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Feb 4, 2016, at 10:15 PM, Matt Paul <mpaul@hillaryclinton.com> wrote: > > + Troy > > This is really strong. > > > On Thursday, February 4, 2016, Lily Adams <ladams@hillaryclinton.com> > wrote: > >> This has some suggestions from Reynolds but wanted to get it to the full >> group since she's in debate mode. we still havent heard from the IDP on >> what the specific 11 precincts are. the math is what they gave us so we >> havent been able to double check. >> >> *Draft Medium Post on Iowa* >> >> There's been even more bluster than usual from the Sanders campaign, this >> time in an effort to disqualify Hillary Clinton's historic victory in >> Monday night's Iowa caucus. >> >> Disparaging good news for Hillary Clinton has become a pattern for the >> Sanders camp. It you support someone else? You're dismissed as part of the " >> establishment >> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.kcci.com_politics_sanders-2Ddes-2Dmoines-2Dregister-2Dis-2Dmedia-2Destablishment_37615894&d=CwMFaQ&c=XRWvQHnpdBDRh-yzrHjqLpXuHNC_9nanQc6pPG_SpT0&r=mJZthOcamSml7FV7KXYLE6P2EQrjV525p9lKVucDNWI&m=fxp5A3e2l6MHoiCdTpQ4t9KSUdqCsbOHjjj78BQpsLc&s=J7446Lo-8SD46_sbmDQ5dhoqZacxrQXrm4JyXIshVjU&e=>," >> unless of course they want to claim your support in ads >> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__bigstory.ap.org_b99bdd52d829418490695b81aa0bfeb7&d=CwMFaQ&c=XRWvQHnpdBDRh-yzrHjqLpXuHNC_9nanQc6pPG_SpT0&r=mJZthOcamSml7FV7KXYLE6P2EQrjV525p9lKVucDNWI&m=fxp5A3e2l6MHoiCdTpQ4t9KSUdqCsbOHjjj78BQpsLc&s=UiyekSV0HNsbSqf2N4XdW7DSVIkVzT4_xh1u_Ccvgrc&e=> anyways. >> If a process doesn't go their way? It's invalid or flawed or they blame the >> Iowans who ran it. >> >> In Iowa, the Sanders camp started floating conspiracy theories leading up >> to the caucus. First, it was two weeks ago when they posited that >> Microsoft >> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.msnbc.com_msnbc_sanders-2Dcampaign-2Dsuspicious-2Dcorporate-2Dinfluence-2Diowa-2Dcaucus&d=CwMFaQ&c=XRWvQHnpdBDRh-yzrHjqLpXuHNC_9nanQc6pPG_SpT0&r=mJZthOcamSml7FV7KXYLE6P2EQrjV525p9lKVucDNWI&m=fxp5A3e2l6MHoiCdTpQ4t9KSUdqCsbOHjjj78BQpsLc&s=WpE8u5rGccFk7CdBBmxnrqjF5A332B9QdIi8W-a5jwM&e=> might >> steal the caucus from them. Now that the caucus is over, they are calling >> into question the results that were reported by everyday *Iowans*. >> >> Hillary Clinton won the Iowa caucus with incredibly high turnout - a >> level of turnout the Sanders camp claimed would earn them a win. It was a >> close contest and a hard fought campaign. But Hillary won. And once it >> became apparent that they had lost, the Bernie Sanders campaign began to >> peddle frivolous claims that have been disproven in an effort to poison an >> otherwise historic night for Hillary Clinton, our supporters, and >> volunteers. >> >> Remember coin flip-gate where people claimed Hillary won all the coin >> tosses? Turns out that wasn't true >> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.cnn.com_2016_02_02_politics_hillary-2Dclinton-2Dcoin-2Dflip-2Diowa-2Dbernie-2Dsanders_&d=CwMFaQ&c=XRWvQHnpdBDRh-yzrHjqLpXuHNC_9nanQc6pPG_SpT0&r=mJZthOcamSml7FV7KXYLE6P2EQrjV525p9lKVucDNWI&m=fxp5A3e2l6MHoiCdTpQ4t9KSUdqCsbOHjjj78BQpsLc&s=FbkNcbQp3NvMofZAvMdLAHaMla9EwwxsTD1agErbXcc&e=>. >> In fact, according to the official count, Sen. Sanders won more coin tosses >> than Hillary Clinton. >> >> Or how about the "90 precincts" with no chairs? Also untrue. Certainly >> there were precincts that took a while to report but once they all did, it >> was clear Hillary had won. >> >> Now the Sanders campaign is disputing the reported results that were sent >> in by everyday Iowans - volunteers, no less! - to the Democratic Party. All >> three campaigns have checked the results of certain precincts against their >> own data reported to them from volunteers. That's normal. For the Sanders >> campaign's challenges, there are 7 total precincts they are questioning >> (out of a whopping total 1,681 precincts!) and the Iowa Democratic Party is >> checking the results on a few more. And they will follow the same standard >> procedure for these questions as they did for precincts we asked them to >> look at - they'll look at the numbers reported that night, check the math >> and figure out if there are any discrepancies or misallocation of delegates. >> >> Here's the kicker. Even if the Sanders campaign were to win all of their >> challenges - the marginal bump they receive in support would not be enough >> to overcome Hillary Clinton's win margin. Those are just the facts. >> >> Here's the math. >> >> *Total Precincts in Contest: 11 (7 from Sanders and 4 from the Iowa >> Democratic Party)* >> *Total State Delegates being Contested: 1.7947 (not enough to change >> outcome)* >> >> *If every contest were to go in the favor of Sanders:* >> >> *HRC = -.775 * >> *Sanders = +.758* >> *MOM = +.0166* >> >> It may be inconvenient for the Sanders campaign that Hillary Clinton won >> the Iowa caucus, but it's the truth. Eight years ago Hillary came in third >> here in Iowa and when she did, she congratulated the winner. We suggest >> Senator Sanders do the same. >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 5:07 PM, John Podesta <jp66@hillaryclinton.com> >> wrote: >> >>> +Teddy >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On Feb 4, 2016, at 5:47 PM, Michael Halle <mhalle@hillaryclinton.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Michael Halle <mhalle@hillaryclinton.com >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> Just talked to the IDP and have some good data here. First, Kathy >>>> Obradabadf;ljaksd from the DMR is writing a column on this to run either >>>> tomorrow or Sunday (we should have IDP push to have it run tomorrow) but >>>> that will give good ammo. We also need to push the IDP to release the below >>>> >>>> Total Precincts in Contest: 11 (7 from Sanders and 7 from Chairs) >>>> Total State Delegates being Contested: 1.7947 (not enough to change >>>> outcome >>>> >>>> If every contest were to go in the favor of Sanders: >>>> HRC = -.775 >>>> Sanders = +.758 >>>> MOM = +.0166 >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Jennifer Palmieri < >>>> jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Sure >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* Michael Halle [mailto:mhalle@hillaryclinton.com] >>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 4, 2016 4:50 PM >>>>> *To:* Kate Offerdahl <kofferdahl@hillaryclinton.com> >>>>> *Cc:* Jennifer Palmieri <jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com>; Lily Adams < >>>>> ladams@hillaryclinton.com>; Christina Reynolds < >>>>> creynolds@hillaryclinton.com>; Marc Elias <melias@perkinscoie.com>; >>>>> Matt Paul <mpaul@hillaryclinton.com>; Robby Mook < >>>>> re47@hillaryclinton.com> >>>>> >>>>> *Subject:* Re: HRC and DMR >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Are people fine to have Troy Price join this call too? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I think we need to get our endorsers behind this and hard. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Kate Offerdahl < >>>>> kofferdahl@hillaryclinton.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Let's do 5:30pm. Sending around a number now. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Jennifer Palmieri < >>>>> jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Adding Elias and adding Kate to see if she can set up a time for a >>>>> call for us to discuss. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* Lily Adams [mailto:ladams@hillaryclinton.com] >>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 4, 2016 4:05 PM >>>>> *To:* Christina Reynolds <creynolds@hillaryclinton.com> >>>>> *Cc:* Jennifer Palmieri <jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com>; Matt Paul < >>>>> mpaul@hillaryclinton.com>; Michael Halle <mhalle@hillaryclinton.com>; >>>>> Robby Mook <re47@hillaryclinton.com> >>>>> *Subject:* Re: HRC and DMR >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Same >>>>> >>>>> --------- >>>>> >>>>> Lily Adams >>>>> >>>>> cell: (202) 368-4013 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Feb 4, 2016, at 2:58 PM, Christina Reynolds < >>>>> creynolds@hillaryclinton.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Free between now and 5 EST, then after 5:30 or so. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* Jennifer Palmieri [mailto:jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com] >>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 4, 2016 3:57 PM >>>>> *To:* Matt Paul <mpaul@hillaryclinton.com>; Michael Halle < >>>>> mhalle@hillaryclinton.com>; Robby Mook <re47@hillaryclinton.com>; >>>>> Lily Adams <ladams@hillaryclinton.com>; Christina Reynolds < >>>>> creynolds@hillaryclinton.com> >>>>> *Subject:* HRC and DMR >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I just told her about them calling for an audit and Sanders campaign >>>>> saying that they are looking at some inconsistencies. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> She is very upset about it – convinced they will try to take the >>>>> victory away from her and wear the party down. She wants a big effort to >>>>> fight here. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Suggest a call…. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> Michael Halle >>>>> >>>>> (217)649-4726 >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Michael Halle >>>> (217)649-4726 >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Michael Halle >>> (217)649-4726 >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Lily Adams >> Iowa Communications Director >> Hillary for America >> c: 202-368-4013 >> > > ------------------------------ > > NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other confidential > information. If you have received it in error, please advise the sender by > reply email and immediately delete the message and any attachments without > copying or disclosing the contents. Thank you. > >