Spurned Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland — whose chance at a spot on the high court was derailed by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell — may have a key say on whether President Trump’s financial records are released to the House.

Trump’s lawyers on Tuesday appealed a lower court’s decision ordering that the records be released to the House Oversight Committee to the Washington, DC, Circuit Court of Appeals — which Garland heads as chief judge.

President Barack Obama nominated Garland to replace Justice Antonin Scalia in 2016 after Scalia’s death.

But McConnell refused to even schedule a meeting of the Senate Judiciary Committee to consider Garland’s nomination, never mind bring Obama’s choice to a vote.

Trump later nominated Neil Gorsuch to replace Scalia, and the GOP-controlled Senate voted to confirm him.

Twitter wags were quick to react to the irony.

“Karma has a new name: Merrick Garland,” tweeted a poster named Tea Pain.

But others noted that Garland was a professional who wouldn’t let personal pique influence his judgment.

“I wish I could say revenge is a dish best served cold, but Merrick Garland is a consummate legal professional who I’m sure will do everything possible to avoid the appearance of any bias. Which, you know, would have been a great reason to have him on the Supreme Court,” posted Zev Karlin-Neumann, a Democratic speechwriter.

Garland is just one of 17 judges who sit on the appellate court, and cases are assigned to a three-judge panel, so it was unclear whether he would even hear the case.

The House Oversight Committee has said it needs Trump’s financial records to examine whether he has conflicts of interest or broke the law by not disentangling himself from his business holdings, as previous presidents have done.