Below is a recent interview with the Hungarian intelligence analyst László Földi, who has been featured in several videos here in the past. In this clip Mr. Földi and the presenter discuss the shadowy political forces that have generated the current “refugee crisis” in Europe for their own ends. In particular he addresses the important question: “Cui bono?”

Many thanks to CrossWare for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:

Transcript:

0:00 The national security expert László Földi is our guest. Good evening. —Good evening.

0:04 Let’s stay with the civilian organizations a bit, because with the

0:08 under-secretary we talked about this previously, that a civilian organization

0:12 could be a state security risk.

0:16 Is it possible to examine such risk with counter-intelligence tools, or

0:20 must Parliament be asked for permission beforehand?

0:24 It is not important whether it is a civilian organization or not,

0:28 this is not how we should phrase this, but everybody who endangers the safety of the state

0:32 that actually commits such an act.

0:36 So what needs to be measured,

0:40 this is done individually, or with a group,

0:44 or in as a civil organization, just a form, yes or no,

0:48 the authorities must decide that what it does

0:52 violates the national security of the state, the activity

0:56 of the organization. In that meaning, yes,

1:00 it is possible to disband any groups, no matter what was their original purpose,

1:04 or whatever ideology they try to align themselves with.

1:08 This example from Florence we were talking about, could it be included here?

1:12 Or we can say only hot-headed young people invented a cause for themselves,

1:16 and they represent that cause no matter what?

1:20 The situation is: the laws must be obeyed.

1:24 That is the basics. Whoever does not comply with the law is committing a crime.

1:28 It does not matter if they are older, or doing it

1:32 out of youthful vigor. If we examine the migration,

1:36 the issue is not how much the migrants want integration,

1:40 but the fact they do not obey laws.

1:44 While they are escaping and running away [from their homelands], I can accept

1:48 that there is no law there to obey, but

1:52 they travel through countries until they reach their destination,

1:56 where they are not in danger at all.

2:00 From that point they have only one task:

2:04 Obey the law. If they do not do that, they are criminals.

2:08 Would you confirm the V4 [Visegrad Four] point of view,

2:12 that we must provide or strengthen the security

2:16 of the external borders of the European Union?

2:20 I think that is a very basic question, in the EU Charter,

2:24 all kind of documents like the NATO Charter or the EU defense document,

2:28 contains such things, that Europe must be defended if anyone

2:32 violates that order, or the sovereignty of the states is violated.

2:36 These are now interesting-sounding sentences,

2:40 and this Australian general who gave this interview,

2:44 he does not really understand why the EU — Jim Molan right? — Yes.

2:48 So he does not understand why we do not solve this problem,

2:52 because it would be very easy to handle this professionally, and he explains it there:

2:56 we must not let the ships in; they must be returned, etc. etc. etc. Listing it.

3:00 One thing he does not take into consideration: he is a soldier, a professional,

3:04 an officer. In Europe the problem is that we could not defend our borders,

3:08 or the European officers could not implement the same logic,

3:12 or follow the same path, but the fact is, in Europe there are such political forces —

3:16 not just in Europe — that created this whole situation itself.

3:20 Australia did not invite anybody there; no political force did such a thing.

3:24 Europe is not playing defense, pulling the short stick,

3:28 but just the opposite: they generated the whole invasion.

3:32 Whose interest is it, to do such a thing?

3:36 Well, this got pointed out at many levels. There are economic groups

3:40 in the background that hope to gain from the migration industry,

3:44 such political forces in the background

3:48 that hope these masses will become their voter base,

3:52 and they will support them, and there are groups in Europe who simply

3:56 wants to convert the continent into a watered-down

4:00 multicultural system opposed against the nation-states.

4:04 These groups really created this invasion,

4:08 they really messed up these poor people here,

4:12 who very often become criminals or will at least be frustrated.

4:16 Jim Molan is that man, who…

4:20 General Jim Molan, who gave the interview to Politico talking about the Australian

4:24 Situation. He said something very interesting. He said

4:28 we should ruin the human smuggler’s business model.

4:32 Those people come here

4:36 and paid the 10-20 thousand euros or dollars.

4:40 Take them back where they came from and they would figure out instantly,

4:44 Oops, they lost 20,000 dollars or euros.

4:48 They would not jump into a deal like that again, and they could tell their friends, too.

4:52 Yes, but I’d like to emphasize the human smugglers just built on something; they didn’t start it,

4:56 So the problem is really this, and the human smugglers…

5:00 Could it be that the business groups and human smugglers have a connection?

5:04 Yes, that is possible. They could have a business relationship between them;

5:08 this is a multi-billion-euro business, and the profit is going somewhere,

5:12 not just to criminals but others, especially in a system

5:16 that was perfectly built for them. Let’s not kid around,

5:20 a gigantic logistical system is required to move such large masses,

5:24 across many borders and countries. By itself,

5:28 this could not spontaneously come into existence at any level.

5:32 The human smugglers are simply tools in the hands of

5:36 the system, which wants to “remake” Europe in this way.

5:40 So not only a political correlation exists here,

5:44 but also an economic one; so politicians and human traffickers are working together?

5:48 Yes those are facts, already well-established facts.

5:52 Because there some political forces in Europe who

5:56 themselves have become part of the migrant industry,

6:00 and participate in the profit-gathering.

6:04 Now you have published a book about the migration crisis. What is your

6:08 Expectation for the near future? Let’s take a one-year period,

6:12 and after a five-year interval, what will change in Europe,

6:16 and what will change in the migration crisis?

6:19 In one year, nothing. It will be interesting how the 2017

6:22 European elections… parliamentary elections turn out.

6:26 That will determine the next five years.

6:30 That is true. What is the event

6:34 that could turn around the outcome of the crisis?

6:38 Those who are thinking about a minimal defense system,

6:42 — it is enough, the minimal defense? Yes, it’s enough

6:46 to stop the process. It is not enough

6:50 to restore order out of the anarchy that we have now;

6:54 that will be a much longer and more arduous process.

6:58 We would need very hard-hearted politicians to take on these issues,

7:02 to work with the problems, the way the Australians are doing it.

7:06 In Australia the politicians are not worse or more hard-core than anywhere else, but

7:10 they defend the interests of their country and their people.

7:14 This is about political correctness (PC) in Europe? Yes, a significant portion