Catchwords:

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for interlocutory injunction requiring the provision to the applicant of urgent medical treatment – duty of care allegedly owed by respondents to applicant brought to Nauru under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – principles relevant to the grant of an interlocutory injunction – whether sufficient likelihood of success to justify grant – where the balance of convenience lies – injunction granted to require the respondents to transfer applicant to a location in Australia where she can be provided with urgent medical treatment – failure of respondents to comply with time limit in injunction due to intervention of Government of Nauru – variation of terms of injunction by consent – application for interlocutory injunction requiring the provision to the applicant of urgent medical treatment – duty of care allegedly owed by respondents to applicant brought to Nauru under the(Cth) – principles relevant to the grant of an interlocutory injunction – whether sufficient likelihood of success to justify grant – where the balance of convenience lies – injunction granted to require the respondents to transfer applicant to a location in Australia where she can be provided with urgent medical treatment – failure of respondents to comply with time limit in injunction due to intervention of Government of Nauru – variation of terms of injunction by consent