"You still work for money, still live in the Capitalist West."



Not out of any meaningful choice. Most of us still need some form of income in order to survive. But by your logic, it's hypocritical to be a slave on a slaveowners land and yet hate being a slave.



"Red China, USSR, Albania, Cuba have all tried Marxist Socialism."



Actually it was more like a form of State-institutionalized Socialism, which failed because the leaders behind the revolutions (Mao,Lenin,Castro etc.) foolishly assumed that they could use their power as well as their control over the state as a means to achieving the Stateless, Classless, Moneyless Society that Karl Marx promised in his Communist Manifesto, but as the book 1984 says: "No-one ever seizes power without relinquishing it. Power is not a means, it is an end."



"Guess what. No one likes it when they work harder than someone else, but don't reap the rewards, because everything has to be divided "equally"."



A simple solution to this that doesn't require Capitalism: in every worker-run factory, have democratically elected "Labour Moniters" that look at the amount of productive hours that a worker has done and determines the wage accordingly, so that the guy who sits on the job gets paid next to nothing and thus is incentivised to work harder. I believe that equal pay should mean equal ability to earn the no. of wages he desires, not a fixed amount that is paid to every worker no matter how hard he works.



"Don't like capitalism? Then don't work for money, find some lace to live where you need no "money"."



Not as simple as that. Eventually at some point, some large Corporation or Bureaucrat with a large sum of money will come across your turf and decide that he just might like having that, and you won't be able to fight back. Unless you go to the most remote corner of the earth, which just isn't an option for most people.



" And yes, Unions are part of Capitalism. Just go talk to their Presidents who make a lot more than you do."



Firstly,explain the Corporate opposition to worker unions in the early part of the 20th Century, like the Dublin Lockout of 1913 for example. Secondly, how does the Presidents of these unions having more money than me make them better than me? It's like saying that Donald Trump is smarter than me because he's wealthier.