Benjamin Garland

Daily Stormer

August 25, 2014

If anything you would think that the Jews would be thanking us for defeating the Germans and liberating the millions of the so-called ‘survivors’ from the so-called ‘Nazi death camps.’ That’s not how they operate though. They believe that there is a hatred for them that lies somewhere in all gentiles and that we can begin Holocausting them out of nowhere at any time.

This constant state of paranoia that the Jews live in is exacerbated by the fact that they ruthlessly exploit any society they are allowed to live in. Just simply allowing people to know the truth about their behavior is enough to guarantee their deportation to Israel at the very least, so they are forced to lie and suppress the truth constantly. This reality causes them to harbor a burning hatred and fanatical aggression toward all non-Jews.

The only way for the Jews to quell this fear of the gentiles turning on them is by completely neutralizing and weakening us so as to make an organized resistance, as what happened in 1930s Germany, impossible.

The promotion of sexual perversion, pornography and obscenity is one of the biggest weapons in the Jews’ arsenal for achieving this aim. The deliberate moral corruption of society can thus be seen as a preventative measure against a potential future Holocaust. The more people are masturbating and thinking about sex, the less they are thinking about what the Jews are doing—much less organizing to fight against them.

Sexual immorality weakens a nation in many ways, not the least of which is by breaking down the nuclear family. The use of pornography, in particular, is very harmful to men. It strips them of their masculinity and makes them docile, weak and apathetic.

An overt example of how the Jews have purposely used pornography as a weapon to destabilize an enemy is when Israeli soldiers took over Palestinian TV stations in 2002 and immediately started broadcasting porn over the airwaves. Professor E. Michael Jones wrote about this:

“The Israelis have recently shown themselves well-versed in what one could call the military use of pornography. At 4:30 PM on March 30, 2002, Israeli military forces took over Palestinian TV stations when they occupied Ramallah in the West Bank, immediately shutting them down. What followed was a little more unusual. Shortly after occupying the Al-Watan TV station, the Israeli forces began broadcasting pornography over its transmitter. Eventually, according to a report from The Advertiser, an Australian newspaper, the Israelis expanded their cultural offensive against the Palestinian people by broadcasting pornography over two other Palestinian stations, the Ammwaj and Al-Sharaq channels. One 52-year-old Palestinian mother of three children, according to the report in The Advertiser, complained about ‘the deliberate psychological damage caused by these broadcasts.‘”

Jews view White people in the West as every bit of an enemy to them as the Palestinian Arabs in the Middle East. Injecting pornography into Western culture had to be done through a much less overt process than what had been done in Palestine though, as their war against the West has been a subversive one, rather than a military one.

The Holocaust and the Sexual Revolution

Pornography—and perversity in general—was accepted into the White world after a long process, through the pseudo-scientific theories of the gentile-hating Jew Sigmund Freud. Freud began developing what is called “psychoanalysis” in Vienna in the late 19th century.

The theory of psychoanalysis is basically that when a person is sexually repressed, frustration builds in their subconscious mind and it eventually causes them mental health problems (including Antisemitism, which the Jews regard as a mental disease).

The traditional practice of suppressing vices such as pornography and homosexuality was demonized by Freudians as being “repressive,” and thus unhealthy to society. Restrictions that had been put into place in the civilized White Western world as a safeguard against the sexual addiction, disease, increase in sex crimes, destruction of the nuclear family and general lowering of morality that the allowing of pornography into a society inevitably leads to, were instead deemed to be the root of all problems in the world.

Freud’s theories were picked up and promoted heavily by many Jews who recognized how beneficial they were to their ethnic interest. Not only did psychoanalysis explain Antisemitism in such a way that let Jewish behavior off of the hook, it was also a great tool for destroying and confusing the minds of their gentile enemies.

Coupling Freud’s psychoanalysis with the theories of another hateful Jew, Karl Marx, a group of Jewish intellectuals started a think tank in Frankfurt, Germany, in 1921, called the Institute of Social Research, with the explicit intent of bringing down the existing social order of the West.

After Hitler came to power in 1933, the Institute for Social Research knew their gig was up in Germany, so they packed their bags and emigrated to New York City and set up what came to be known as the “Frankfurt School.” There they immediately resumed their subversive activities, now targeting their new host, America, who had just welcomed them with open arms.

Influential books by Frankfurt School Jews such as The Authoritarian Personality by Theodor Adorno, Eros and Civilization by Herbert Marcuse, and The Mass Psychology of Fascism, The Sexual Revolution and The Function of the Orgasm, by Wilhelm Reich, all made the same insane argument that Western civilization was fundamentally sick and inherently evil and Antisemitic, and could only be cured through the eradication of all sexual restraints, even (or even especially) in children.

The influence of the Frankfurt School Jews cannot be underestimated. Wilhelm Reich (who had been a direct pupil of Freud), for one, is no small figure – he is considered the “father of the sexual revolution.” Reich, who was a strong and outspoken proponent of the sexualization of children, was an extremist who claimed that all problems stem from people not having enough orgasms, and that if everyone would just have as many orgasms as they can, as often as possible, all of society’s ills would be cured.

As crazy as that sounds, he was taken very seriously by the 60s radicals on college campuses throughout Europe and America, thanks to the broad, tightly-knit, ethnic network of Jews in Academia and media who promoted his and the Frankfurt School’s works, giving them the air of respectability.

The 60s generation was ripe for accepting the ideas of Reich and his ilk, having been born during or right after the most brutal war of all time and living in the midst of another seemingly senseless war, Vietnam. And they were being told by these Jews that the Holocaust—and war in general—was the result of the sexual repression of their parents’ generation. If only we had “free love,” we wouldn’t have any war, the argument went, and so “make love, not war,” became the slogan and attitude of the day.

The sadistic brutality of the Holocaust story and the dishonesty it would take to tell such a monstrous lie were so alien to the soul of the White man that he bought it hook, line and sinker, and ended up perversely ashamed of his own kind and naively sympathetic toward his enemy, the Jew.

The post-WWII West was left puzzled as to how such a thing as the Holocaust could possibly happen. This period is often referred to as “struggling to come to terms with the Holocaust.” What Freud and his successors in the Frankfurt School had already been saying for years was now validated: The Germans had been sexually repressed, so a Holocaust was inevitable, and so the best way to prevent another Holocaust is to become “liberated” from any and all sexual morals.

This laid the groundwork for the sexual revolution that took place in the 1960s—the horrors of which we are still living with today:

Over 50% of all marriages now end in divorce. Children are having sex at earlier and earlier ages and have access to the most depraved, soul-crushing pornography imaginable with the click of a button on their smartphones or laptops. Homosexuality is basically normalized, with pedophilia and bestiality on the way. Sexually transmitted diseases and illicit pregnancies are on the rise. Tens of millions of babies have been murdered by abortions and the birth rate of the White race has dropped well below replacement level—with White women of child-bearing age making up only 1-2% of the world’s population—guaranteeing its rapid extinction unless there is a radical reversal of current trends.

In other words, Western society has been absolutely decimated by this Jewish instigated “sexual revolution.”

The Jews, on the other hand, have come to be the undisputed masters of the world since the end of WWII, while Antisemitism has been in a steady decline.

Origins of the Holocaust Myth



Most people will understandably have a programmed, knee-jerk response to questioning the Holocaust narrative, due to the massive amounts of propaganda they have been exposed to and the magnitude of the lie.

How can such a big lie exist? It has to be true, right?

But, upon taking a step back, if one is willing to do so, the reason for the existence of the Holocaust story makes perfect sense: war propaganda. The so-called “Holocaust” is propaganda in an ongoing war between the Jews and those with the courage to stand up to them—a war that began with the National Socialists coming to power in Germany in the 1930s and continues to this very day. The Jews do not have the means or the numbers to defeat Europeans with the force of arms so they have to rely mainly on infiltration, subversion, and economic and psychological warfare, with the Holocaust hoax being the best example of the latter.

The Holocaust story is not just simply psychological warfare against White Europeans though, it is also absolutely essential to the survival of Jewish supremacy, as any study of the Nazis rise to power will inevitably show the justification they had in opposing the Jews who had been wrecking their nation. All information about that era of German’s history has to be juxtaposed with stories of sadistic mass murder in order to diffuse the reality of the situation, which is that the Germans were completely justified in persecuting and expelling the Jews (which is all that was actually happening), just as we would be today.

Hitler and the National Socialists freed Germany from the death grip of the Jews and gave it back to the German people who subsequently turned it into the world’s foremost super power in a very short time. This posed a grave threat to the highly organized Jewish power base worldwide by exposing their machinations for the world to see.

Naturally, International Jewry, and Jews in general, hated Hitler and the Germans for this and wanted them destroyed. The only way to convince the American people, 50% of whom were of German ancestry themselves, to go to war with their European brothers was by using their control over the American media to spread atrocity propaganda of the worst kind.

The Jewish propaganda campaign against Germany started virtually immediately after Hitler came to power in 1933. Samuel Untermyer, speaking on behalf of Jewry worldwide, declared war on Germany with an economic boycott—an act of war the same as a gunshot or a bomb.

Shortly after that, Untermyer gave an hysterical radio broadcast denouncing the Germans as “ingrates” and “cruel and savage beasts,” and calling for Christians to unite with the Jews to destroy Germany in a “sacred war.” Untermyer claimed that the Germans were “annihilating” the Jews by:

locking them in vile concentration camps, starving and torturing them, murdering and beating them without cause and resorting to every other conceivable form of torture, inhuman beyond conception, until suicide has become their only means of escape, and all solely because they are or their remote ancestors were Jews, and all with the avowed object of exterminating them.

Even the official historical narrative of today only says that the so-called “extermination” of Jews, and the widespread utilization of concentration camps in Germany did not begin until 1939, yet this was only 1933 and Untermyer was already making clear and direct references to what we now know as the “Holocaust.”

How is that possible? That fact alone (along with no real evidence to the contrary) is proof that the Holocaust story is just the result of Jewish propaganda, rather than an actual happening. Furthermore, the Jews had been pushing the “six million” figure going back many decades, as early as 1897.

The wartime propaganda used to demonize Hitler and Germany that eventually evolved into what is now known as the “Holocaust,” was (and still is) the perfect excuse for the Jews and their allies to justify carrying out the most destructive war of all time.

The Jews saw how they could greatly benefit from the Holocaust hoax after the war in many ways, including painting themselves as the world’s eternal victims, raking in billions of dollars in ‘reparation’ payments, demonizing any and all opposition to them as ‘Nazis who want to kill six million Jews,’ and, as this article is attempting to show, weakening gentile society by corrupting our morals through the spread of obscenity.

From the ‘Suicide Girls’ to ‘Schindler’s List’

A standout feature in most stories about the “Holocaust” is the extreme perversity included in them. This, as anyone even vaguely familiar with the Holocaust industry knows, is done to traumatize people into sympathizing with the “poor, inoffensive Jews,” for what they supposedly had to endure during WWII.

The Jews also use the “Holocaust” as leverage to get people to accept perverse garbage that would otherwise be deemed unfit for public consumption. Under the pretense of trying to prevent atrocities such as the alleged “Holocaust” from ever happening again, the Jews force us to accept viewing and reading the most shocking and grotesque imagery that their demented minds can conjure up. People normally would not allow their children to look at piles of dead corpses, for example, yet this is occurring a grand scale in schools every single year—it’s even required by law in many areas.

A New York Times news story titled “93 Jewish Girls Who Choose Suicide Before Nazi Shame” that surfaced in 1943 is one of the aforementioned propaganda lies that were instrumental in whipping the Americans into an intense anti-German fervor. Jewish author Josh Lambert, in his eye-opening 2013 book Unclean Lips: Obscenity, Jews and American Culture had this to say about the myth of the “93 Suicide Girls,” and the Jewish spreading of anti-German sentiment in general:

Images of Nazis as sexual criminals, as rapists and defilers of Jewish women, whether based on fact or on fantasy, proliferated in the United States along with the earliest reports of the Holocaust. In one crucial and resonant case, on January 8, 1943, the New York Times, . . . printed in full the translated text of a Yiddish letter received in New York that purported to tell the story of “ninety-three Jewish girls and young Jewish women” in a Bais Yakov religious school who “chose mass suicide to escape being forced into prostitution by German soldiers” in Krakow in August 1942. Despite doubts about the letter’s veracity, the story of this incident spread widely and continues to be retold to this day as fact.

Lambert went on to talk about the mass promotion and far-reaching influence that the myth of the “93 Suicide Girls” had on American popular culture following its release:

. . . the story compelled attention and inspired creativity in the United States. Within months, the ninety-three martyred girls had become the subject of at least two published poems–one written in English, the other translated from Hebrew into English–and one English-language short story. In the postwar years, the story also seems to have partly inspired novels which depict concentration camp brothels filled with Jewish women: Yehiel Dinur’s House of Dolls, translated to English and published in the United States in 1955, and Edward Lewis Wallant’s The Pawnbroker (1961).

House of Dolls, first translated into English in 1955, is an extremely disturbing book that was written by a mentally insane Jew who called himself “Ka-Tzetnik 135633” (“Ka-Tzetnik” means “concentration camper” and “135633” was his prisoner number). House of Dolls was the second Holocaust book by “Ka-Tzetnik” in, as one Jewish journalist put it, a “string of often lurid novel-memoirs, works that shock the reader with grotesque scenes of torture, perverse sexuality, and cannibalism” It was also, of course, a complete hoax.

The scenario in Tzetnik’s book takes place in an alleged Nazi brothel called the “Joy Division,” where Jewesses were forced into prostitution. “Ka-Tzetnik 135633” is generally considered a hoaxster and his work is generally accepted as being nothing but fantasy, and is commonly referred to as “Holocaust pornography.”

The claim of Nazis having sex with Jewish prostitutes goes against the Nuremberg racial purity laws and flies in the face of the official narrative of the Nazis being hardcore racists, making it too far-fetched even for the Jews to get behind. The idea for Tzeknik’s disgusting book no doubt came from the “93 Suicide Girls” article, which is also, as previously stated, a known hoax.

The Pawnbroker was another Holocaust novel that was inspired by the “93 Suicide Girls” article. It was adapted into a movie in 1964 by the Jew Sidney Lumet and became the very first movie allowed to break the Production Code for nudity—showing the nude breasts of a Negress prostitute—on the predictable argument that it was necessary for telling the “full story.” The trivia section on the Internet Movie Database (IMDb) page for the movie says this:

After the filmmakers appealed to the MPAA’s appeals board to oppose censoring the film, it became the first US film to show a nude woman from the waist up and be granted a Production Code Seal. It was the first of a series of confrontations between filmmakers and the MPAA in the 1960s that would lead to the abandonment of the Code within five years in favor of a ratings system.

The film’s success was based largely on the controversy surrounding the nudity. So while the producers used the importance of telling the Holohoax story to convince the censors by claiming it was “necessary to the movie” and “moral,” it could be surmised that in this case, as far as to the public at large, they were using nudity to sell the Holocaust, rather than the other way around.

So while the Holocaust was cleverly and successfully used to get nudity past the censors, the nudity was in turn used to sell the Holocaust fantasy to the gentile masses. A movie about something as dark as the Holocaust was still a tough sell for the largely Christian, not yet as demoralized American public, but nudity was not. Most men cannot resist such a thing. 90% of all men have probably seen the godawful movie Swordfish for the same reason, to give a contemporary example.

Things got even more bizarre on the Holohoax front after House of Dolls and The Pawnbroker. Those two stories led directly to the advent of ‘Naziploitation’ films, which are campy, over-the-top, sex and gore, horror fantasy films about evil, cartoonish German Nazis conducting all kinds of weird experiments on Jewish concentration camp prisoners.

From the “93 Suicide Girls,” to the ‘Naziploitation’ films, these bizarre and perverted tales are still sometimes presented to the public as reality, though not really defended as real to anyone who does any real research. Much like the shrunken Jew heads or Jew soap or Jew lampshades, the stories have long since been discredited, and are admitted to be false even by mainstream Jewish historians—but if you don’t know that, the Jews aren’t exactly going to go out of their way to tell you.

Ilsa, She Wolf of the SS—the king of all ‘Naziploitation’ films—opens with a written statement claiming that the movie is based on a true story and needs to be seen in order that it “will never occur again.” Within 5 seconds of watching the film you see two people having graphic sex with a clear display of actual penetration. Ilsa is a truly sick movie, almost beyond belief.

Claiming that Ilsa has anything to do with real life events or that it contains uncomfortable truths that need to be seen in order to prevent them from happening again, is an insult to even the dumbest viewer’s intelligence. It is clearly nothing more than trashy, pornographic smut.

I watched this horrible movie on YouTube, by the way, the same place that a child could.

This is the synopsis for Ilsa:

Ilsa is Kommandant of a Nazi prison camp, who conducts sadistic scientific experiments designed to demonstrate that women are more capable of enduring pain than men are, and therefore should be allowed to fight in the army. Ilsa is also portrayed as a buxom woman with a voracious sexual appetite for men. Every night, she chooses another one of her male prisoners and rapes him; however, due to her insatiable hunger, she gets disappointed when her current victim eventually ejaculates, and promptly has him castrated and put to death. Only an American prisoner, who can withhold ejaculating, manages to use her weakness to his favor.

Just imagine the “chutzpah” of claiming that a b-grade Jewish torture porn movie such as that is based on “documented fact.”

Ilsa is only one of many filthy “Naziploixtation” genre films. Here are the covers of a few more of them:

Getting back to literature for a moment, let’s explore what is maybe the most famous Holocaust story of all time, the so-called Diary of Anne Frank, first published in 1952.

The ‘Diary,’ which is an obvious fraud—written well beyond the capabilities of a 12 or 13-year-old girl—is laced with pornographic and sexually subversive passages.

In the book, Anne opines that parents should “[tell] their sons and daughters everything [about sex] at the age of twelve” and that “it’s not wrong for a man to bring a little experience to a marriage. After all, it has nothing to do with the marriage itself, does it?”



Anne ponders how she would describe her genitalia to a boy she likes:

. . . In the upper part, between the outer labia, there’s a fold of skin that, on second thought, looks like a kind of a blister. That’s the clitoris. Then come the inner labia, which are also pressed together in a kind of crease. When they open up, you can see a fleshy little mound, no bigger than the top of my thumb. The upper part has a couple of small holes in it, which is where the urine comes out. The lower part looks as if it were just skin, and yet that’s where the vagina is. You can barely find it, because the folds of skin hide the opening. The hole’s so small I can hardly imagine how a man could get in there, much less how a baby could come out. It’s hard enough trying to get your index finger inside. That’s all there is, and yet it plays such an important role!

Anne was also a bisexual degenerate with homosexual fantasies, apparently:

Unconsciously, I had these feelings even before I came here. Once when I was spending the night at Jacque’s, I could no longer restrain my curiosity about her body, which she’d always hidden from me and which I’d never seen. I asked her whether, as proof of our friendship, we could touch each other’s breasts. Jacque refused. I also had a terrible desire to kiss her, which I did. Every time I see a female nude, such as the Venus in my art history book, I go into ecstasy. Sometimes I find them so exquisite I have to struggle to hold back my tears. If only I had a girlfriend!

What adult wouldn’t blush reading trash like this—supposedly written by a pre-teen girl—much less want to expose their young sons and daughters to it? Yet every year children read the Anne Frank story in elementary schools all across America and the world.

It is much harder for one to object to questionable material when it is contained in stories about the Holocaust though. That’s the Jewish trick. Anyone who objects is made out to be an evil person who must love the extermination of innocent Jews, Fascism and Hitler.

A good microcosm of how this Jewish propaganda tactic works is found in the comment section of an article on the Jewish news outlet Huffington Post about a mother who objected to exposing 7th grade students to the inappropriate material found in Anne Frank’s ‘Diary’:

Now that we have touched on how the Jews have used their Holocaust hoax as a sinister tool to successfully promote perversity in movies, literature and Academia, let’s look at what they have accomplished with it in regard to network television.

Just as the first theatrical movie to break the Production Code for nudity was a Holohoax film, so was the first to manage to get it onto prime time television. It was the miniseries War and Remembrance. It says this on the trivia page of the series’ IMDb:

In the “death camp” segment there is a shot of several nude “bodies” showing women’s breasts. This was the first time that nudity was shown on network TV in prime time.

An article from 1988 found on the Los Angeles Times website explains how ABC had to make a deal with the Jewish director to allow him to show nudity, in order for him to agree to filming the project:

ABC was able to hook him by promising him a budget far above the ordinary for a TV miniseries and agreeing to give him free reign to depict the graphic horror of the Holocaust–including extreme violence and nudity. “I told them to forget the rest of it–I didn’t know how I was going to do the Battle of Midway, I didn’t know how I was going to do submarine warfare and all of that stuff–but on the Holocaust,” Curtis recalled, “I cannot be censored. How can you worry about seeing frontal nudity when you’re talking about massacring 11 million people?”

The same excuse of wanting to show the full ‘reality’ of the so-called Holocaust was used to air the chief Holohoax film of all time, Schindler’s List, uncensored, on TV in 1997.

Schindler’s List took this clever subversion technique a step further though; along with the dozens of naked victims shown being abused and exterminated by the Nazis in the film, it also features non-gas chamber related nudity that has nothing to do with the so-called Holocaust, such as Schindler having sex with a woman and multiple women lying on beds with their breasts exposed.

The film was also shown during “prime time,” at 7 o’clock on a Sunday to 65 million viewers, many of them children, and has been aired unedited ever since.

The only public figure to come out against this travesty was a conservative Republican Senator, Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, who said the airing had taken network television “to an all-time low, with full frontal nudity, violence and profanity being shown in our homes.” and that “the fact that it aired on public television on a Sunday evening during a family time should outrage parents and decent-minded individuals everywhere.”

Coburn was viciously attacked on all fronts for these comments, even by fellow conservatives, demonstrating just how enslaved we have become to the Jews and their lies. Just 40 years earlier, prior to The Pawnbroker, there had still been censors in place preventing nudity in theatrical films—much less prime time television—but by 1997 there was just one man (who, by the way, later apologized due to pressure) who would object to it publicly.

Coburn’s position was, undoubtedly, the rational position that spoke to the best interests of the public, yet he was portrayed in the media as an immoral person with some kind of sinister agenda.

There was an all out Kosher Jihad unleashed on Coburn, simply for his stating of the obvious:

GOP activist William Bennett said: “These are very unfortunate and foolish comments. Coburn’s view obscures, even obliterates, the distinction between gratuitous violence and nudity — that is violence and nudity to titillate — and violence and human realism essential to the telling of an important story or historical truth.”

Sen Alfonse D’Amato, a New York Republican, said “To equate the nudity of the Holocaust victims in the concentration camp with any sexual connotations is outrageous and offensive.”

NBC West Coast president Don Olhmeyer said “I just wonder if Congressman Coburn is aware that there was a Holocaust, that millions of people died and it’s not something anybody should ever forget. We think that Congressman Coburn’s statement should send a chill through every intelligent and fair-minded person in America.”

Two-time Republican Presidential nominee Jack Kemp said that “Failure to recognize the value of such programming is disappointing and disturbing.”

What’s next, mandatory Holohoax pornography for Kindergarteners? And you’re an evil Nazi if you object to it?

When is Enough going to be Enough?



This topic of this article is just one aspect of the how the Holocaust story has been weaponized against us. It is also simultaneously used as the excuse for massive third world immigration into White countries, and the denial of any racial consciousness among Whites.

In fact, as hard of a pill as it is to swallow, the Jews are using their made up story of genocide as the primary tool to pull off a very real, much worse genocide, with the entire White race as their victims!

So even if the ridiculous Holocaust story was based on actual fact, if it means that we must be turned into a bunch of degenerates and eventually bred out of existence, then obviously the only sensible course of action would be for us to stop caring about it.

Why not forget about the alleged suffering that the Jews went through at the hands of our kind in the past, and start caring about the suffering being inflicted on us, right here in the present, at the hands of the Jew? Our current situation under the jackboot of these demons is more extreme and alarming than any Holocaust fairy tale that they could ever come up with. That much is certain.