Re: Superdelegates

From:tflournoy11@gmail.com To: re47@hillaryclinton.com CC: jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com, john.podesta@gmail.com, ha16@hillaryclinton.com Date: 2016-02-12 18:13 Subject: Re: Superdelegates

Well, I get that. But I am always wary of a movement narrative taking hold Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T ----- David and now Vlasich are working these guys full time with the help of the political staff--and we haven't had any flakes so far. On the press front, I don't want to engage. Nothing says establishment more than superdelegates, so I'd rather force the DNC to be the ones to defend it...I'd like to lay low and make sure we're touching our people very frequently and constantly re-affirming support. Moveon and other organizations are running an intense terrorism campaign and I worry responding publicly only emboldens them. I'd go so far as to say that some of the emails people have been sending have been backfiring (lots of bernie bro), but we're not taking anything for granted. On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 3:04 PM, tina <tflournoy11@gmail.com> wrote: > Both > Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T > ------------------------------ > *From: * Robby Mook <re47@hillaryclinton.com> > *Date: *Fri, 12 Feb 2016 15:00:43 -0500 > *To: *Tina Flournoy<tflournoy11@gmail.com> > *Cc: *Jennifer Palmieri<jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com>; John Podesta< > john.podesta@gmail.com>; Huma Abedin<ha16@hillaryclinton.com> > *Subject: *Re: Superdelegates > > Just so I'm clear--we're looking for a press strategy on this? Or a > strategy to retain our people? > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:07 PM, tina <tflournoy11@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Yes, as I think it's gaining traction >> Can you get a breakdown of the superdelegates? >> >> Race/ gender etc - >> And some biographies of some of the superdelegates - are there still >> Jackson DNC members? (Those added to DNC post a 1988 deal with Rev Jackson) >> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T >> ------------------------------ >> *From: * Jennifer Palmieri <jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com> >> *Date: *Fri, 12 Feb 2016 13:04:41 -0500 >> *To: *Tina Flournoy<tflournoy11@gmail.com> >> *Cc: *John Podesta<john.podesta@gmail.com>; Robby Mook< >> re47@hillaryclinton.com>; Huma Abedin<ha16@hillaryclinton.com> >> *Subject: *Re: Superdelegates >> >> We need to figure this out. >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:02 PM, tina <tflournoy11@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Do we have a message around this? >>> >>> The massive victory by Bernie Sanders in New Hampshire was a pivotal >>> moment in the race for the Democratic nomination. >>> >>> Taken with the close results in Iowa, one thing is increasingly clear: >>> This is going to be a long primary season, and every single delegate is >>> going to be important. >>> >>> Which is why many Sanders supporters were shocked to see what the news >>> media had to say about the delegate count on Wednesday morning. Even though >>> Bernie won New Hampshire by an absolute landslide, the press claimed that >>> he and Hillary Clinton were leaving the state with an equal number of >>> delegates -- because most of the state's superdelegates are promising to >>> vote for Hillary at the convention. >>> >>> Here's how it works. In addition to the thousands of pledged delegates, >>> who are allotted to each campaign based on primary and caucus results, >>> there are 712 superdelegates -- made up of Democratic elected officials and >>> party insiders -- who get to vote on who the party's nominee should be at >>> the convention. >>> >>> If the race is close, superdelegates could determine who the nominee >>> will be regardless of who the majority of voters supported. Pretty >>> undemocratic, isn't it? >>> >>> I think the race for who the Democratic nominee will be should be >>> decided by the voters, not by a handful of party elites. If you agree, >>> please sign my petition with Democracy for America calling on all >>> Democratic superdelegates to pledge right now that they will support the >>> candidate who wins the popular vote.< >>> http://act.democracyforamerica.com/sign/RobertReichSuperdelegates/?t=1&akid=7396.2141088.--fppZ >>> > >>> >>> This isn't the first time that Democrats have raised concerns over the >>> superdelegate system. >>> >>> In 2008, when the race between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton was at >>> its closest, some people thought that superdelegates would be able change >>> the results of the nomination process. >>> >>> My friends at Democracy for America took action then as well. In 2008, >>> more than 60,000 DFA members signed and delivered a petition to Democratic >>> Party leadership asking superdelegates not to overturn the will of the >>> voters. And that year, they didn't. Most superdelegates either changed >>> their support or waited to choose a side until after Obama won the majority >>> of delegates pledged through the primary process. >>> >>> Unfortunately, the party failed to reform this unfair and undemocratic >>> part of the nomination process in the years since President Obama was >>> elected. Now, we're facing another potential crisis in the party. >>> >>> If supporters of either candidate walk away from this process feeling >>> cheated because party insiders nullified their votes, it will be impossible >>> to put together a winning coalition in November. >>> >>> Holding on to the White House in 2016 is extremely important. We can't >>> afford to let party elites jeopardize that by ignoring the will of the >>> voters. Join me and DFA in telling superdelegates to pledge to support the >>> popularly-elected winner of the nomination now.< >>> http://act.democracyforamerica.com/sign/RobertReichSuperdelegates/?t=2&akid=7396.2141088.--fppZ >>> > >>> >>> Thanks for signing this important petition and passing it along to your >>> friends. >>> >>> - Robert >>> >>> Robert Reich >>> Former Secretary of Labor >>> >>> [http://act.democracyforamerica.com/o.gif?akid=7396.2141088.--fppZ] >>> DONATE< >>> https://secure.actblue.com/contribute/page/superdelegates?refcode=CSD021216RRw&refcode2=7396&akid=7396.2141088.--fppZ >>> > >>> Paid for by Democracy for America, >>> http://www.democracyforamerica.com/?t=3&akid=7396.2141088.--fppZ< >>> http://www.democracyforamerica.com?akid=7396.2141088.--fppZ> and not >>> authorized by any candidate. Contributions to Democracy for America are not >>> deductible for federal income tax purposes. >>> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T >> >> >> >