Download raw source

Delivered-To: john.podesta@gmail.com Received: by 10.25.24.71 with SMTP id o68csp99543lfi; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 19:17:37 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.55.42.129 with SMTP id q1mr13662408qkq.54.1425525455485; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 19:17:35 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: <robbymook2015@gmail.com> Received: from mail-qc0-x22c.google.com (mail-qc0-x22c.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22c]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i90si3028707qge.83.2015.03.04.19.17.34 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Mar 2015 19:17:35 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of robbymook2015@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22c as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22c; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of robbymook2015@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22c as permitted sender) smtp.mail=robbymook2015@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: by mail-qc0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id s11so1198276qcv.6; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 19:17:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=VpBgFGuq9MQjIXmd9Oy/KZar9NCjSjWs8TeCDpOg7Ow=; b=Tt1+inrsjMWXQSVCE3ZsO0S60NW/ivjrP93HCszyBKA4Diyoxe20P2hZ+g6QrcQCCw bOL0+PbindVfo+wX6j1enXHqqu1M8x9cSU8uw28qNB0oHH/Fw66IGu6QDFWkpLt/lZhU Q5e/O0XmiDNdjlDaMia1ogfdPp3bwz6zwQP8Xda3j1N8MDjj/qDBW7S5V4gQRH2fNfnR BhwoHwQrRP25M2CcoQiXE/c2XSeOTkh41EiCgyRb/tNST0XbXW7dYKrQwVAUbDEQbgwb jqQCKQBvpN94eDTMd0NLTxs0E+OhJ9WITzHKdDLlyoMDZAS1eti90KQ+/pKegV379VTt n4sw== X-Received: by 10.140.109.99 with SMTP id k90mr9560981qgf.35.1425525454393; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 19:17:34 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: <robbymook2015@gmail.com> Received: from [192.168.1.123] (rrcs-108-176-7-18.nyc.biz.rr.com. [108.176.7.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b8sm2134766qkb.46.2015.03.04.19.17.33 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Mar 2015 19:17:33 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Emails development From: Robby Mook <robbymook2015@gmail.com> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12B466) In-Reply-To: <49AE62D6-734D-440A-B139-30DD943C493F@aol.com> Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 22:17:32 -0500 CC: Jennifer Palmier I <jennifer.m.palmieri@gmail.com>, "Margolis, Jim" <Jim.Margolis@gmmb.com>, Joel Benenson <jbenenson@bsgco.com>, Teddy Goff <teddy@precisionstrategies.com>, Kristina Schake <kristinakschake@gmail.com>, John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <FD25E7BF-07DC-497C-B5A3-B4718D4C3B26@gmail.com> References: <A2030020-246D-443F-A0B7-ABEA6C5EF2D1@gmail.com> <D11D14DD.16E02%jim.margolis@gmmb.com> <F16B7D2C-0C62-4A46-990B-41951F15E834@gmail.com> <A398C3A9-53F9-41A0-9248-BC5C4FF744E3@aol.com> <8E3A8991-F8FE-4F96-8644-6BE4CB5E2829@gmail.com> <49AE62D6-734D-440A-B139-30DD943C493F@aol.com> To: Mandy Grunwald <gruncom@aol.com> Also good operations changes in the works. Will update tomorrow. =20 > On Mar 4, 2015, at 9:52 PM, Mandy Grunwald <gruncom@aol.com> wrote: >=20 > Great. >=20 > Mandy Grunwald > Grunwald Communications > 202 973-9400 >=20 >=20 >=20 >> On Mar 4, 2015, at 9:48 PM, Jennifer Palmier I <jennifer.m.palmieri@gmail= .com> wrote: >>=20 >> Those guys are all in the 55k. Sure there will still be haters who say i= t is not enough, but it will be an unprecedented release of emails. No one= else would have done anything approaching this (in an federal administratio= anyway). >>=20 >> Sent from my iPhone >>=20 >>> On Mar 4, 2015, at 9:34 PM, Mandy Grunwald <gruncom@aol.com> wrote: >>>=20 >>> Agreed. >>>=20 >>> Do we have a definition of "truly personal"? "Family and friends"? >>>=20 >>> Are Huma, Philippe, Cheryl etc included in the 55,000? >>>=20 >>> Mandy Grunwald >>> Grunwald Communications >>> 202 973-9400 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>> On Mar 4, 2015, at 8:20 PM, Jennifer Palmier I <jennifer.m.palmieri@gma= il.com> wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> 55k is entire batch of emails she gave to State. So that represents al= l of her email that was official business. Only emails we would not be maki= ng public are her truly personal ones. >>>>=20 >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>=20 >>>>> On Mar 4, 2015, at 8:01 PM, Margolis, Jim <Jim.Margolis@gmmb.com> wrot= e: >>>>>=20 >>>>> Yes. >>>>> If there is a release of the 55K, are there others that are not being >>>>> released? >>>>>=20 >>>>> On 3/4/15, 7:25 PM, "Jennifer Palmier I" <jennifer.m.palmieri@gmail.co= m> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>>> Team - wanted to let you know that Cheryl is working with State to ge= t >>>>>> agreement on release of the 55k pages of emails she have to State. T= he >>>>>> hope would be that we are able to say tonight to the press that we ar= e >>>>>> working with State to get emails released soon. Not sure where those= >>>>>> discussions will land, but hope is either State agrees to release on >>>>>> timely basis or we pledge to release them ourselves in ten days/week.= >>>>>> Assume you all would agree this is right move? >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>=20