1) At least 36 organized Trump inauguration day protests have been scheduled in 18 states across the US on January 19th, 20th and 21st, with 21 more protests setup in locales around the globe.

Firstly, it is important to address once again the outright hypocrisy of a group that recently lambasted Trump for refusing to say that he would accept the outcome of the election if he lost, while now doing exactly that.

Despite the venom that was spewed by the corporate media about Trump not respecting the glorious “democracy” that we so clearly do not have in this country, the very same group has now clearly committed the exact affront to freedom of which they so vehemently accused Trump during the election.

Hypocrisies aside, the right to protest is one of the most valued and important rights that Americans inherently possess. That being said, the bastardization of that right by globalist warmongers such as George Soros, who intentionally manipulate that sacred dynamic between a people and their government by orchestrating violence through agent provocateurs and paid instigators designed to create strife and aggression where none exists, completely dismantle that right and turn it into yet another control mechanism of the state. For you see, once a peaceful protest gets intentionally pushed, by instigators such as Soros, into riotous territory, it gives the state the excuse to both use force to shut it down and label the group violent disruptors which denigrates the true message of change.







2) The liberal media is openly, and unapologetically supporting the protest of Trump’s inauguration.

The New York Times even wrote an op-ed calling January 20th “the anti-inauguration.” For a supposedly “non-partisan” media, that seems alarmingly partisan. All sarcasm aside, even those supporting these extremely slanted news outlets know the idea of partisanship is now deeply embedded in their day-to-day operations–whether or not they admit it to themselves. To pretend it does not play a major role in both deciding what to cover as well as how to cover it, is to actively choose ignorance.

Knowing that Soros, as well as many other groups, are planning and orchestrating outright violence in an attempt to stop the lawfully elected president from being inaugurated, what these media organizations are doing is no less than intentionally inciting a riot on the day the President of the United States is to be sworn into office. Again, quite a hypocritical stance for the very outlets that claimed Trump has no respect for the “democratic process.” It would appear that in this nation of double-speak and programmed responses, burning down the city in protest is the utmost respect for our “democracy.”

“The inauguration of Donald Trump as the 45th president of the United States is just two weeks away, so now is the time to begin making plans to send him the strongest possible signal that your opposition to the presidency he has foreshadowed will not be pouting and passive, but active and animated. Now is the time to begin making your plans for the anti-inauguration.” NYT

3) Many supporters of this plan to disrupt inauguration day are openly threatening that this Trump “protest” will be like The Purge.

The Purge is a dystopian film where once a year the rule of law and emergency services are suspended for 12 hours wherein Americans can murder, rape, pillage and steal, breaking any law they desire without fear of legal reprisal. Aside from the clear associations this film has with the current electoral strife, such as the film’s tagline of, “Keep America Great,” or the last film’s title being Election Day, this propaganda tool is just a movie.

The actions about to take place on the 20th are real, and are being incited by those who wish to manipulate the outcome to better favor their own agenda, of which it would seem Trump does not serve. To fan such flames of resentment and intentional violence, is not only irresponsible, but shows a reckless abandon for the American lives that are at stake if such a political upheaval were to take place.

As much as this can be explained away as simple Internet boasting and exaggeration, it should show all the level of psychological derangement that has been created within the minds of these fanatics. It has been indoctrinated into these anti-Trump zealots that he is so evil and dangerous to our currently failing way of life, that they must take extreme measures to stop him. With that ideology in mind, such an extreme and violent path toward stopping Trump begins to seem all too possible.

It’s midnight (CST). Does the Purge start tonight or are we waiting for January 20? #ElectionNight — Jeff Wolfe (@bytezilla) November 9, 2016

Inauguration Day: Commencement of the Annual Purge — Lili Reinhart (@lilireinhart) November 9, 2016







4) Stars such as Rosie O’Donnell are openly calling for martial law to stop Donald Trump.

One might think at first glance that this type of statement, especially coming from the “comedian” Ms. O’Donnell, is made in jest or intentionally speaking in hyperbole to make a point. As that is entirely possible, it should first be noted that her tweet which made that call-to-action was pinned to her the top of her page with its million plus followers, in which each was left to decide for themselves whether she was joking or genuine in her plea. Many no doubt took that sentiment to heart, as now all across the internet liberals are calling for, and petitioning Obama to initiate, martial law. Not for any reason of protection, or an impending threat, but, because Trump.

That being said, with the heated past between the President-Elect and O’Donnell, it is all too clear that she would support such an extreme and ill-considered action to, at all costs, stop Trump from taking his seat of power. The point being that Rosie is not rising up to combat a person she sees as bad for Americans(although she likely does feel that way), she is seeking any path to stop a man with whom she holds in extreme contempt. She is taking her very personal hatred for an individual and allowing that hate to put the very structure of this country at risk, all for a personal vendetta. Her and any others willing to further destabilize this country at one of its weakest and most precarious points, all to further their own agenda, should be ashamed of themselves.

@Rosie Sounds good to me I support anything to stop the idiot — jaylisab (@jaylisab) January 12, 2017

@Rosie @MasterMarquette @CBSNews @luvauntyruth @Elaine_Quijano Rosie I work for Rachel Maddow would u like to come on show to discuss? DM ME — R. MaddowsAdamsApple (@NaseUrban) January 12, 2017

@Rosie not too smart. You do know soldiers are not “peace officers”, we don’t yell “Freeze” or “stop resisting”. #BeCarefulWhatUWish4 — Charlie Michaels (@GreenRoom_WTFNR) January 12, 2017

5) All signs point to the mainstream media and current administration colluding to bring down, or hinder Donald Trump’s inauguration.

One of the many false and intentionally misleading stories that have been put out just in the past few months, is that Trump is planning on dismantling the CIA; the very boisterous threat that many believe was the main reason JFK was assassinated. Yet, this was completely false, and Trump’s team has openly named it as such. Many independent researchers warned that this was an attempt to create a context on which Trump could be taken out; a line of thought that is not only believed to be true by many journalists, but by Trump himself. According to Paul Craig Roberts,

“Trump himself seems to think he is in danger. According to MSNBC, Trump intends to supplement his Secret Service protection with private security. As there is evidence of CIA complicity in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy (film shows Secret Service agents ordered away from JFK’s limo immediately prior to his assassination), Trump, who is clearly seen as a threat by the military/security complex, is not being paranoid. MSNBC implies that Trump’s private security is to suppress protesters, as if government security forces have shown any compunction about suppressing protesters.”







In addition to these clear signs that something is amiss, Obama has asked the head of the D.C. National Guard to step down effective 12:01pm on inauguration day. Major-General Errol Schwartz has not been given a reason for why he is suddenly being told to step down just before what is easily the most contested and seemingly confrontational election in recent history.

Schwartz said that he has not been told why he was asked to step down. “I’m a soldier,” he said, noting that he was following orders and has no regrets. “I’m a presidential appointee, therefore the president has the power to remove me.”

More over, Schwartz has spent months planning security for this upcoming event alongside D.C. police, secret service and other top D.C. officials. During the inauguration the Major-General was to not only command the members of the D.C. Guard, but also an addition 5000 troops that were sent in across the country to help, as well as oversee the military air support meant to protect the nation’s capital during the event. Schwartz himself is quoted saying,

“The timing is extremely unusual.”

Seems all too similar to the series of events that led up to the assassination of JFK in Dallas, wherein all Kennedy’s Secret Service were replaced and all the security plans were changed just before he was shot and killed.

This is not an attempt to outright claim that Trump is certainly in danger, or that the current administration is planning to assassinate Donald Trump, but rather a compilation of information on which each must come to their own conclusions, lest they be manipulated by outside influence.

Whether it be the instigation of violent protests on inauguration day to send a poorly thought-out message, or just an attempt at an altogether unlawful political transition to put another in power, it’s clear that something is happening. The true question all must ask, is whether the unrest and violent urgings are being perpetuated by a faction of our very own government, or if they are just simply choosing to allow it to happen. Either way, it would appear as if the sanctity of this nation’s “democracy,” as well as the safety of its citizens, are a mere afterthought in this Game-of-Thrones-style plot to bring down the next President of the United States of America.

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tS7sf6uyY6k, https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/05/opinion/the-anti-inauguration.html, http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/01/12/rosie-odonnell-calls-martial-law-delay-trump-inauguration/