Opposition to AT&T deal smacks of politics Is Trump administration poised to block a sensible merger just to spite CNN?: Our view

The Editorial Board | USA TODAY

Show Caption Hide Caption U.S. Justice dept. sues to block AT&T bid for Time Warner The U.S. Department of Justice sued AT&T on Monday to block its $85.4 billion acquisition of Time Warner Inc, saying the deal could raise prices for rivals and pay-TV subscribers. Video provided by Reuters

As a general rule, Republicans and Democrats see antitrust matters differently. Republicans tend to favor a light touch on mergers and acquisitions, while Democrats are more likely to step in if they see a threat to competition.

This was vividly illustrated in 2001, when the incoming Bush administration brought a quick end to the landmark case against Microsoft filed by the Clinton administration.

Why, then, is the Trump administration poised to take a hard line against AT&T's proposed acquisition of Time Warner?

OPPOSING VIEW: Reject 'wildly anti-competitive' merger

The legal grounds for a court challenge are weak, so the most plausible explanation is President Trump's oft-stated grudge against CNN, which is part of Time Warner's Turner Broadcasting unit.

Ever since the Nixon administration secretly meddled in antitrust policy, both parties have tried to keep raw partisan politics out of it. Presidents appoint certain types of lawyers to head the Justice Department and Federal Trade Commission antitrust units, then leave them alone to conduct independent reviews that follow the facts and the law.

At least that was the practice until Trump became president.

From a legal standpoint, the Justice Department challenge is puzzling. In fact, Trump’s top antitrust enforcer at Justice, Makan Delrahim, told an interviewer last year, before joining the administration, that he did not see any problem with the merger.

And why would he? “Vertical” mergers linking two adjacent industries raise far fewer red flags than “horizontal” mergers of competing companies in the same industry. AT&T, a telecommunications company, and Time Warner, a content provider, have virtually no competing business lines.

Now, however, Delrahim has inexplicably reversed course, joining Trump, who has long vented against both CNN and this merger, and a small coalition of liberal consumer groups that oppose most high-profile corporate combinations.

According to published reports, Justice has told AT&T that the company would need to divest either DirecTV, or buy Time Warner minus Turner Broadcasting, to get the deal approved.

None of this makes any sense outside of political vendettas. Turner Broadcasting is fairly small potatoes in terms of market power. And barring a combination of DirecTV with a slew of television channels would fly in the face of precedent.

The Obama administration, which earned a reputation for relatively tough antitrust enforcement, allowed a similar merger of media and content when it signed off on Comcast’s purchase of NBCUniversal.

If the AT&T-Time Warner case goes to court, the administration is highly likely to lose, but not before wasting a lot of taxpayer and shareholder money on legal fees in the process.

USA TODAY's editorial opinions are decided by its Editorial Board, separate from the news staff. Most editorials are coupled with an opposing view — a unique USA TODAY feature.

To read more editorials, go to the Opinion front page or sign up for the daily Opinion email newsletter. To respond to this editorial, submit a comment to letters@usatoday.com.

If you can't see this reader poll, please refresh your page.