The following excerpt isn't from the600Club. This one is from his recent revision to MindStar. He added one whole new chapter to the book, and here are some slices from it. He def shoulda included this stuff in the first edition.





"Some materialists are so fanatic in their certainty that since 'they' are only freak, persistent electrochemical accidents, everything else in the entire OU must be too. Thus they confidently deny not just any creative genius behind the subatomic, interfunctional complexity of the OU/'Nature', but the uniform and continuous enforcement of this 'Natural Law' (NL) everywhere from millisecond to millisecond.



"The odds against the entirety of this are prima facie impossible, so atheists handle this annoyance by refusing to discuss it. Questions as to why, if one’s personal consciousness is nothing more than a freak electrical collision in the brain, this 'illusion' should continue with consistent memory for the individual’s lifetime - and why such a “freak electrical accident” coincidentally occurs in every other human brain.



"Insistent that 'he' is nothing more than this electrical illusion, the atheist has nothing but nothing to anticipate when the electrical switch is turned off: the proverbial Big Black Sack (BBS) of extinction, of nothingness.



"The absence of any supernatural morality, including of posthumous reward/punishment for incarnate behavior, makes sincere atheists that much more dangerous to others, as they are motivated only by sensual gratification. Some may of course derive pleasure from kindness, but others just as whimsically may enjoy depravity, torture, murder. Indeed the entire spectrum of sensual gratification has nowhere a moral governor; the overriding goal is relief from boredom, of being forced to confront the futility of a meaningless consciousness."



[pp. 135-136]





"Agnostics seek to avoid the pretentious arrogance of avowed atheists by maintaining that there is not enough information to answer the design/enforce question one way or the other.



"Just as glaringly this but begs the question, because the intricacy/consistency realities are every bit as visible and inescapable to them. All they demonstrate by their refusal to confront the question is their fear that the obvious answer will doom them to 'creationist' ridicule in supercilious atheist circles. Thus they succeed only in emulating ostriches."



[p. 138]



