guru bala 684 days ago

National academy of sciences,committee reported,in its overall conclusion.., ''Answers to some of the more pressing questions cannot be addressed with existing data, and research methods however well designed...the data available on many questions are too weak to support unambiguous conclusions or strong policy statements.-'' so what you can trust is the pertinent question.. obviously policy cannot be trusted'' see can you trust GST as a policy, there are too many leakages in the very central government, obviously definitely you cheat the states that is a fact, quantum you may not say, may be too much or too differently in different states, so bank funding is it genuine need based or something else, you saw how PNB could advance so much money to Nirav Modi, do you have a sensible data... obvious, not at all. but you allowed him run away with so much funds at whose costs...- This doesn''t mean people won'';t continue to rely on just ''facts'', ''to justify ''preferred policy proposals''. So it does mean there won''t be any real world connections of (corrections) between the facts and the proposals (proposals mostly dubious for any reasons, you saw Amit shah at sabharimala now says against entry of women of fertility ages but why he did support first SC decision then)'', so his is a policy of convenience!. People will chose which ''facts'' they find persuasive on some meaningful basis as people mostly bestowed with robust common sense other than ''reality''. The basis is understand