Peter Golds is a Conservative politician in London. He’s also gay and Jewish. So, given the positions of the Board of Deputies, you would expect him to be delighted with the racial and religious vibrancy in the borough of Tower Hamlets. Thanks to mass immigration, White Christians are no longer dominant there and have lost the power to persecute and oppress Jews and gays.

But alas, Mr Golds is not delighted at the fruits of vibrancy. A Bangladeshi Muslim called Lutfur Rahman has just won a second term as mayor of Tower Hamlets. Has he turned the borough into a shining beacon of tolerance, equality and Islamic probity? Sadly, it doesn’t seem so:

December 2010-February 2011: At council meetings, Shiraj Haque and a crowd of other Lutfur supporters shout homophobic abuse at the mayor’s opponents from the public gallery. They abuse Peter Golds, the Tory leader, as “Mrs Golds” and a “poofter” [= “faggot”]. They heckle another gay councillor, Labour’s Josh Peck, and a gay local resident speaking at the meeting with animal noises and cries of “Unnatural acts! Unnatural acts!” January 27, 2011: An official Labour Party inquiry finds a “concerted effort” to add fake members to the party during the campaign to select Labour’s candidate for the Tower Hamlets mayoralty. February 23: Lutfur’s voting bloc on the council passes a motion to “campaign against the pariah state of Israel.” March 8: Lutfur gives a character reference on Town Hall notepaper for Zamal Uddin, a minicab driver who had six weeks earlier pleaded guilty to a serious sexual assault on a woman passenger. When the press finds out, he claims that he did not know the nature of Uddin’s crime before agreeing to provide the reference. March: Shiraj Haque is appointed chair of the advisory board for a major council-subsidised festival, the Baishakhi Mela. The council had previously removed him from all involvement with the festival and severed relations after allegations, which he denies, of massive financial irregularities and immigration fraud, with the Mela used as a front to bring in illegal immigrants under the guise of performers. (Lutfur Rahman: some facts the Guardian forgot to mention, The Daily Telegraph, 27th January 2013)

As Francis Carr Begbie has pointed out on TOO, modern Britain faces a baffling question: Why are Muslims behaving like Muslims? Peter Golds has said that Tower Hamlets is a stage for “third-world village politics” (see here). Mary Dejevsky, a journalist at The Independent, thinks that the recent elections there reflect the “worst of Bangladesh,” not the “best of British” (see here).

So Britain imports people from villages in the Third World and guess what? We get “third-world village politics.” Baffling. Britain allows mass immigration from Bangladesh and guess what? We get the “worst of Bangladesh,” not the “best of British.” Baffling again. But another apparent mystery — no action by the authorities — is easy to explain:

As councillors at the scrutiny hearing said, this spending was “not benefiting the borough as a whole” but “being directed to certain areas where the mayor had the majority of his voter base”. The council refused to answer questions from The Sunday Telegraph about the grants, merely saying that it had “followed the relevant laws, guidance and policies”. … Mr Golds said: “I think we know what the perceived community benefits in these cases are: the re-election of Lutfur Rahman. This council is out of control and its behaviour smacks of the days of Dame Shirley Porter.” John Biggs, Mr Rahman’s Labour opponent for the mayoralty, said: “It looks as if Lutfur Rahman is trying to use taxpayers’ money to buy votes.” Dame Shirley, the gerrymanderer of the Westminster “homes for votes” scandal in the late Eighties and early Nineties, was eventually disqualified, humiliated and forced into exile – but don’t expect anything to happen to Lutfur Rahman any time soon. Terrified of being accused of racism, the authorities appear content to let Tower Hamlets stew in its own juice. (Borough of Tower Hamlets: a byword for sleaze, The Daily Telegraph, 18th January 2014)

So is Lutfur Rahman following in the footsteps of a corrupt British politician? Not quite: Dame Shirley Porter went into exile in Israel. That’s quite a coincidence: two hugely corrupt administrations led by two minority politicians. It’s almost as though minorities don’t shower blessings on British Whites after all.

In fact, I’d go further: I think the destruction of Tower Hamlets is the result of a terrible pathology. An advanced White civilization has opened its borders to corrupt and violent non-Whites from the Third World. These non-Whites are of low average intelligence and have no history of economic success, intellectual achievement, or participation in a high-trust society. But they’re encouraged to blame all their failures in Britain on the racism and prejudice of Whites. They are also subsidized to reproduce at rates far above their White hosts.

Those are deeply unnatural acts. And they’ve been repeated right across the West. Whites have allowed non-Whites to immigrate and reproduce at startling rates, then blamed themselves for all failure by the non-Whites. There’s only one word for behaviour like that: pathological. A healthy, self-confident civilization doesn’t turn on itself like that. Would China allow mass immigration by Pakistanis and Somalis and then blame itself when the vibrant incomers began committing crimes and taking over Chinese politics? No, not in a million years.

But that’s what the West has done. And if Peter Golds wants to apportion blame for the destruction of Tower Hamlets, perhaps he should look first at his own folk: Jews in Britain have strongly supported both mass immigration and the crushing of free speech about its consequences. But the vibrant incomers do not appear to be grateful for the hospitality Jews have extended at the expense of the White British:

Lutfur Rahman sees himself as the victim both of a relentlessly hostile media and his former party, Labour, which dumped him as its mayoral candidate in 2010. … One thing is clear, though: the Mayor is not a racist. “I grew up with black kids and white kids,” he sobbed. “I grew up with Jewish kids, Christian kids, people of no faith.” Yet while Mr Rahman can’t take it when he’s accused of racism, some of his supporters seem happy to dish it out. Here, for example, are comments from one supporter’s Facebook page, adorned with pictures of the Mayor: “Zionists are the root cause of all the evil on this planet right now Zionists are filthy animals with total depravity of any form of decent humanity. Behaviour of those who are descendants of Pigs and Monkeys (Zionist). Zionist filth!” (Divide and rule: How race politics has poisoned Tower Hamlets, The Independent, 30th May 2014)

Britain is following France, where Jews have welcomed Muslims in and Muslims have responded with hatred and murder (see here and here). If Britain and France were genuine democracies, none of this would have happened, because the White majority have always opposed mass immigration from the Third World. We were right to do so. The hostile elite were wrong. Diversity is turning into a disaster. If you need proof, just take a tour of Tower Hamlets.

Appendix: A Lot More Lutfur