Second, the Supreme Court narrowly construes obstruction of justice. A threshold requirement is to prove a specific intent to obstruct justice. Trump’s comment to Comey about the Flynn investigation, which clearly acknowledges the FBI’s power to make the final determination, falls far short. Comey did not describe any other actions that would support an obstruction charge. He has no evidence that Trump destroyed, concealed, or tampered with evidence, or that he ordered witnesses to lie, or that he pressured any officials to stop their investigations. Trump did not discuss the broader investigation into Russian interference with our elections. Indeed, Comey’s testimony establishes that Trump actually welcomed an FBI investigation into his “satellite associates.”