You can disagree with her views on faith and traditional marriage, but just because it's lost on her that she lives in an era where she can actually choose to live this way instead of it just being "the way things are", doesn't mean it's appropriate for us to jump all over her and tear it down. No matter how confoundingly, inexplicabley, backwards I* — err, I mean, "you all" may think it is. It's not what most of us would choose and I, personally, have a hard time understanding it.

Also, she should use something less charged than "liberal". By her definition, marriage in the U.S. has been liberal since Abigail Adams told John to "remember the ladies" in 1776. But hey, if the perimeters they have set for their life include plastic surgery along with saying grace, I can only hope they're happy and never in the market for a new sucker* — I mean, spouse.

Now, if you want to get into how she thinks gays are going to hell, well, yeah, the gloves will be off. That's just her being a giant hypocrite.

*I know, right, it's hard to defend this level of nonsense!