On Tuesday’s Hardball and reacting to Iran having launched missiles at an Iraqi military base housing U.S. soldiers, NBC News Tehran bureau chief Ali Arouzi likely bolstered his perch in the eyes of the Iranian regime, promoting one propaganda point after another to MSNBC host Chris Matthews. This included the utterly false claim that “30 U.S. soldiers have been killed in this attack.”

Arouzi boasted: “The IRGC was saying that, Ayatollah Khamenei, the supreme leader of this country, was in the control center coordinating these attacks. This is — this bit of — I’m not sure about, but Iran state media is claiming that 30 U.S. soldiers have been killed in this attack. Now, this is not confirmed. This is just coming from Iranian media.”

If it’s unconfirmed and uttered by a murderous regime, perhaps not sharing it was the best option! Yes, the liberal media hate President Trump and have flip-flopped to not trusting our intelligence professionals, but deciding to pass along what Iran said was quite the turn.

Put it another way: CNN didn’t even think it was worth sharing. And if the Jeffrey Zucker-led network decided not to report it, call your offices, Ali.

Arouzi didn’t stop there, doing everything in his power to further escalate the situation and take a dig at Trump through the lens of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei (click “expand”):

But we have just stepped over the precipice here, Chris. We have entered a very unpredictable time. We have to see what the response is from the United States. But this is undoubtedly the most serious moment between Iran and America in the last 40 years. It's very, very tense here. On the way to the bureau, I had the radio on. Songs of marches to war were being played. We're just getting reports now that Iran has deployed its entire air force. They are saying that if they are retaliated for these attacks, they will launch attacks in the Emirates, in Dubai, and anywhere else that it is complicit with the United States. Also, Ayatollah Khamenei just released a statement saying that he sees no difference between the United States and Israel in this conflict. So this is drawing people from all sides into this what is potentially the beginning of a war, Chris. I just — I don't know how this is going to go in the coming hours, but it's not looking good from the rhetoric that came out from President Trump earlier today saying that he will retaliate against any retaliation from Iran. I think we can expect an attack on Iran imminently.

Unfortunately, but not surprisingly, Matthews wasn’t any better. Picking up on his constant use of using the Iranian regime’s preferred rhetoric on the strike, Matthews drew an equivalence between Iran and the U.S. because the U.S. “kill[ed] or assassinat[ed]...the general — the revered General Soleimani, the references by the President in the last week to going after cultural sites.”

Matthews added that he’s “sensing a religious fervor on the part of Khamenei” because “[o]nce again, the conversation is getting to the point of almost mortality of each country.”

Arouzi responded by again peddling Iranian talking points, boasting that Iran doesn’t “want this mistaken for a sign of weakness, that they need to rely on or prop up their proxies, so yeah, I mean, all bets seem to be off.”

He then went onto describe how, at around 4:21 a.m. in Tehran, “everybody is wake now,” “calling each other,” and “trying to get their families out of major cities like Tehran out into the countryside” as part of a fear that the country could plunge into a war like the Iran-Iraq war that left half a million Iranians dead.

Surmising that another such war “may be unfolding again,” Arouzi bragged that, considering all of the Iranian-backed militias in the Middle East, “all U.S. personnel in this region are — are in grave danger.”

Eventually, Arouzi concluded his embarrassing live shot with more boasting and speculating (click “expand”):

If all of those militias suddenly rise up, you know, all U.S. personnel in this region are — are in grave danger. Earlier in the day, Katib Hezbollah, which is the militia group under Iran’s patronage, that attacked the U.S. embassy that sparked off this initial crisis released a statement this morning saying that we are waiting for Iran — Iran's army to launch a military strike against U.S. forces and then we'll go immediately into action. So we're expecting the proxies also to strike at any moment now back as well. I mean, this — this is, I guess, what you call the fog of war. We're not sure what's going to happen from moment to moment as we're going forward. But Iran — I think Iran also caught — caught America off guard. They've been saying they're going to attack. They were trying to keep it as sort of elusive as possible, if you will, and all of a sudden, in the dead of night, they have hit that base in Iraq, which we have to see how the U.S. retaliates. If the U.S. retaliates, this is going to blow up beyond any imagination.

Like an empty suit, Matthews concluded without any pushback against this second set of comments, instead thanking Arouzi for having “given us a lot of clarity tonight, sir, in these remarkable circumstances.”

To see the relevant transcript from MSNBC’s Hardball on January 7, click “expand.”