Daniel Chomistek

2015-04-27 21:38:00 -0400

Hey Joan,

See you got up on the wrong side of the bed this morning.

Maybe you could help me out.

Misogynist seems to be your favorite salvo.

Want to explain why you think I’m one? Seeing as how we got into a bit of a tiff over women’s rights before?

You’ve already forgotten that I was the one who said I’d sailed through the Middle East, and was called an Islamophobe when I tried to tell people here, how women are treated like garbage over there. I kind of think, if I were misogynistic, I’d tend to be saying, "Dem Middle East guys, dey gots dis treat’n wimmens stuff down pat.



I haven’t looked up what “Philosophy” of Science and Education actually entails, but long term memory skills don’t seem to be a requirement.



Nor does logic and deductive reasoning.



First; I didn’t say all articles on Wiki were wrong. I said on social issues they’re very biased.

Second; I’m not anti-intellectual. I’m anti people who think they’re smarter than they are. Or is it Anti people who are not smart enough to realize they’re not that smart.

Third; Pro-shariah? Kindly refer to my previous statement: “I sailed through the Middle East, and was called an Islamophobe.” I can’t very well be both.

Fourth; And Fifth: Pro-communist/totalitarianism? Are you just slinging mud and seeing what sticks? I wasn’t even aware we got into world governments. Please point out how you came to those conclusions, cause I don’t seem to recall spewing any Marxist, Leninist, Stalinist, or Maoist rhetoric. You know. “Workers of the World Unite.” “Social Justice.” Bourgeoisie proletariats. (Although I don’t think those two words combined really make sense. But they sound cool. Which is good enough to fool the masses—Doh!)

Sixth; Of course I’m trying to “Attack your source” by discrediting Wikipedia. That’s how all debates go. You show how an opponent’s information is flawed or wrong, you don’t attack their character. If I say, Joan is this and Joan is that, that’s mud slinging; like your saying I’m use tactics similar to the kmer rouge, Nazis, and Islamic State. Lawyers don’t win cases by attacking the other lawyer. They win by saying, “Your defense is wrong because the source of your information, your client, is wrong. These are the laws, and this is what he did in violation of said laws. Ergo, you have nothing to back your position.”

Seventh: Ashamed of my closet endorsement of Russel Williams? Isn’t that more mud slinging. I never brought the guy up in our little back and forth here, so unless you can show how my comments endorse, or match his, aren’t you bordering on liable there?

Seventh; There’s a reason rude feminists are called FemiNazis. It’s because they adopt the Nazi tactics, or at least Brownshirt tactics, of mud slinging and brow beating.

Eighth; Just looked up Russel Williams. Skimmed through it and WOW ! What a nut job. If you think any of my comments are in any way, shape or form, akin or comparable to him, then…



You scare me.

commented