Download raw source

Delivered-To: john.podesta@gmail.com Received: by 10.25.24.103 with SMTP id o100csp1006457lfi; Sun, 14 Jun 2015 11:21:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.200.42 with SMTP id jp10mr43999715wjc.66.1434306064012; Sun, 14 Jun 2015 11:21:04 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com> Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com (mail-wi0-x22d.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id vl9si13308186wjc.156.2015.06.14.11.21.03 for <john.podesta@gmail.com> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 14 Jun 2015 11:21:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com; dkim=pass header.i=@hillaryclinton.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=hillaryclinton.com Received: by mail-wi0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id x6so57131438wif.0 for <john.podesta@gmail.com>; Sun, 14 Jun 2015 11:21:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hillaryclinton.com; s=google; h=from:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/C6d0+f4ZPhON5mL5UOPLzy30UzpG5q56ig8xQjTFTU=; b=DcsyFABeNDvoe/gaUQ46Lve+C6PYx3F6p5TxExhiiLMFaHHfl/tsBcfbT30URGctcn iXBTtMZ5FVS+ZJcGm6iamag8VjHrebnGbM0p23JaLW0gG/6IkS0XNvFtBzc9F1Kwwpcq 18+mzUOitwaBTc8HJ0W/uMubYQTgwe1faQydI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/C6d0+f4ZPhON5mL5UOPLzy30UzpG5q56ig8xQjTFTU=; b=jROwKQ5pYbEycV3kHv4PLTVdSP2hSGVa+pc6oe8I7hCh05WxWxwO6VndOX9CeO2SS9 WABMfZlXOjzJqyfmXFRwATMblqtmUB6GXUXbxDu06MD8mr/LMLOXQecCFYJoJh4Ll6Qh JsogisiDrXdQsFVUpBSN/tnNYd6AqgAB3cOn/DSk6A32POeBOopS4sil5cwvww/jvjON sUqtVUE845KLoj2icMFs7tpzM9GwcZkha+eT0X9MkEaPb/ayoc1ecVI9pBWwyceQyI/c MTpD74qYEZIu/W3CW3fLuDhUsl1Shw/isN70JIx3saNIeVv64/deK9upJDQCXXQqRHqb SKzw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmSdR1PNIEv28vQiiXNUvn+iYTdnYZGix1Wg9SSRxJH2zEelMD33ACoojQOY2QdKvdPZidO X-Received: by 10.181.11.229 with SMTP id el5mr25158865wid.40.1434306063738; Sun, 14 Jun 2015 11:21:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Jennifer Palmieri <jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) References: <-1729367223628963602@unknownmsgid> <8d47691037adedfdd062d6a5893d0b1a@mail.gmail.com> <130643142651199886@unknownmsgid> <c3e460543ce6ca8fa8697bc6f2762a6c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <c3e460543ce6ca8fa8697bc6f2762a6c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2015 13:21:02 -0500 Message-ID: <-5390133771552367950@unknownmsgid> Subject: Re: Should we make sure to frame her TPP position to reporters? To: Christina Reynolds <creynolds@hillaryclinton.com> CC: Robby Mook <re47@hillaryclinton.com>, Kristina Schake <kschake@hillaryclinton.com>, Brian Fallon <bfallon@hillaryclinton.com>, John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am here with the press too so can jump on anyone who is a prob. Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 14, 2015, at 1:19 PM, Christina Reynolds <creynolds@hillaryclinton= .com> wrote: > > Jennifer Epstein =E2=80=8F@jeneps 3m3 minutes ago > Clinton just sounded a lot more supportive of Nancy Pelosi's approach on > trade than of President Obama's > > Dan Merica =E2=80=8F@danmericaCNN 4m4 minutes ago > And on transparency, Clinton says people should be able to "see what will= be > in a final deal." > > Kathie Obradovich =E2=80=8F@KObradovich 4m4 minutes ago > .@HillaryClinton says president should work with Democrats in Congress to > improve TPP; if it can't be fixed, should be no deal. #iacaucus > > Kristen Welker =E2=80=8F@kwelkernbc 4m4 minutes ago > Clinton makes no definitive statement on trade but mentions Pelosi twice, > distancing herself from POTUS on trade, appealing labor etc. > > Jennifer Epstein =E2=80=8F@jeneps 4m4 minutes ago > Clinton on TPP: "some specifics in there that could and should be changed= " > and/but "let's take the lemons and turn them into lemonade" > > Alex Seitz-Wald =E2=80=8F@aseitzwald 5m5 minutes ago > Clinton still waiting on TPP/TPA, but moves towards opponents: Calls for > provide "more transparency" and changes to satisfy Pelosi. > > Ruby Cramer =E2=80=8F@rubycramer 5m5 minutes ago > Clinton framing TPP debate as an "opportunity" to make potential changes = to > the deal > > Dan Merica =E2=80=8F@danmericaCNN 5m5 minutes ago > Clinton: To get deal that "meets these high standards," Clinton says, Oba= ma > should "work with his allies in Congress," starting with Pelosi. > > Rick Klein =E2=80=8F@rickklein 1m1 minute ago > Hillary today: "the President should listen to and work with allies in > Congress starting with Nancy Pelosi." Via @CeciliaVegaABC > > Patrick Healy =E2=80=8F@patrickhealynyt 1m1 minute ago > In Iowa @HillaryClinton urges @BarackObama to work w/ @NancyPelosi (says > name 2x) on TPP. "If we don=E2=80=99t get it, there should be no deal." > > -----Original Message----- > From: Robby Mook [mailto:re47@hillaryclinton.com] > Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2015 2:17 PM > To: Christina Reynolds > Cc: Jennifer Palmieri; Kristina Schake; Brian Fallon; John Podesta > Subject: Re: Should we make sure to frame her TPP position to reporters? > > Ok. I'm fine w that then. > > > >> On Jun 14, 2015, at 2:16 PM, Christina Reynolds >> <creynolds@hillaryclinton.com> wrote: >> >> Reporters on twitter framing it as embracing Pelosi more, moving away >> from Obama. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Robby Mook [mailto:re47@hillaryclinton.com] >> Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2015 2:16 PM >> To: Christina Reynolds; Jennifer Palmieri; Kristina Schake; Brian >> Fallon; John Podesta >> Subject: Should we make sure to frame her TPP position to reporters? >> >> I want to make sure this isn't interpreted as "supporting TPP". I >> assume O'Malley and Sanders will characterize her remarks as support.