Daeda said: Excellent news, my fav game of 2011. Based on interviews I had with David Anfossi on the theoretical future of the franchise (so: lets say you make a sequel, where will you go given that HR is a preview) the game will most likely take place somewhere in the timeline between HR and DX1 btw.. Click to expand...

Vinterbird said: With a established engine, systems, work flow and team you can get a lot done in two years. A massive amount actually. Click to expand...

I'm happy with that. Another option is turning Invisible War into the Highlander 2 of the series and write it out of canon. And another is set it after Invisible War.One thing I'd like to see is a protagonist that's antiquated technology.I’m not saying they’re necessarily bad. It’s just, well, you have games like Uncharted 2 that took Uncharted 1 and made it (much) better. That’s cool and all. But to me MGS3 is the type of sequel I like to see. I like MGS2 more than MGS3, but it’s not a direct comparison. MGS3 is very different from MGS2. Same with Half-Life 2 compared to Half-Life 1, DXHR and DX1, etc.I’d rather developers have space to discover a sequel that doesn’t rely on iterative on what came before. I just like it when the sequel is the next thing. If it could be done in two years or even one year, then more power to them. Everyone operates differently.I’m all for new DLC or an expansion pack in the meantime, though. Missing Link was fantastic.