Turning Climate Change Upside Down

Written by Richard F Cronin

image source: filmblerg.com

Take everything you think of climate change and turn it upside down. The variations in heating, cooling, and CO2 concentration in the atmosphere come from below.

Of emphasis here is the very real, minuscule uptick in CO2 which does not come from radiation sources. Of course, CO2 has nothing to do with global warming. It only feeds the plants.

I argue such points about geothermal heat and my obsession about Herndon’s Georeactor as well as the uniform observation from ice cores and past epochs that the uptick in CO2 lags the uptick in heat. See: http://nuclearplanet.com/

The latest work on Antarctic ice cores were taken by French glaciologists and, allowing for degassing from glacial compression, yields a lag period of 200 years — say, the duration from the end of the Little Ice Age to the current time.

The French glaciologists took their ice core observations in the deep interior of Antarctica in what is the largest, most arid region (desert) of the world. With minimal snow, the ice sheets of Antarctica’s interior form from below due to the steam emitted from multiple subglacial volcanoes, trenches, canyons, and subglacial lakes. Researchers from Washington University (St. Louis) describe the bottom of the Bentley Subglacial Trench as a “magma blow torch”.

See: https://www.scientificamerican .com/article/ice-core-data- help-solve/

Recall that the Warmists dismiss observations of the Medieval Warming Period, claiming that the warming was largely confined to the Northern Hemisphere. The Dust Bowl of the 1930s was also an event peculiar to North America.

In a way, the Warmists are correct about the variations in warming confined to the Northern Hemisphere. Even the litigious Mickey Mann, like a blind squirrel, can find a nut every now and then.

See: https://www.meteo.psu.edu/holo cene/public_html/shared/articl es/medclimopt.pdf

Logically, the internal heat of the Earth transmits pretty uniformly thru the crust and continental land masses, notably in the land masses of the Northern Hemisphere. The boreholes measurements of Davies & Davies (2010, 2013) indicate a fairly uniform temperature profile — on land.

The work of Davies & Davies took no observations in the Arctic Ocean, Antarctica, Greenland, nor deep ocean waters. Very few boreholes were taken in northern Canada, Siberia, and continental shelves. Any heat dissipated into the ocean waters is less observable, yet the temperature differential ( driving force) is greatest for the heat transmitted from the crust into the oceans.

See: https://www.solid-earth.net/1/ 5/2010/se-1-5-2010.pdf

See: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary. wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ggg e.20271

Moreover, the Earth is a globe. The lithosphere (crust) is thickest around the Equator and thinnest around the landless North Pole — closest to the Earth’s heat engine. Antarctica’s atmosphere and surrounding ocean water is largely isolated due to the powerful, relentless circumpolar winds, which also drive the Antarctic current.

So, indeed, prior heating and cooling eras were driven by the Arctic regions and the mostly dramatic effects were observed in the Northern Hemisphere.

The Arctic has the Gakkel Ridge ( varying 3 to 5 km below sea level), multiple CO2-emitting submarine volcanoes, as well as the Laptev Rift in the Laptev Sea.

The result, during reduced activity in the GeoReactor (a Soliton Breeder Reactor), were the great ice sheets which descended across North America, Europe, and Siberia during the Ice Ages.

Any heating attributed to solar, Milankovitch cycles, and imaginary “CO2 forcing” are relatively uniform at any given point in time and should not be considered dominant. Again, we have experienced a measurable uptick in CO2 concentration. The inbound radiation heat sources are controlled by phase change in low level clouds. Condensation of water vapor to rain and rain freezing to snow.

See: https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.001 65

Emphasis:

“This is the reason why IPCC has to use a very large sensitivity to compensate a too small natural component. Further, they have to leave out the strong negative feedback due to the clouds in order to magnify the sensitivity. In addition, this paper proves that the changes in the low cloud cover fraction practically control the global temperature.” The heating/cooling variations emanating from the Arctic are the dominant, relevant phenomena. See: https://principia-scientific.o rg/climate-change-earths-inter nal-heat-flux-and-localized- hot-spots/ See: https://principia-scientific.o rg/naturally-occurring-fission -plate-climatology-and-the- georeactor/

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX .

Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.

Share this: Twitter

Facebook

Parler

LinkedIn

Print

Email

More

Telegram

Pinterest



WhatsApp

Reddit



Pocket

Skype



Tumblr



Related