The horrific case shocked even the Supreme Court Judge who presided over

Three young children watched as their radicalised father killed their mother

The ISIS-sympathiser father, 36, gouged out the 27-year-old mother eye out

He then cut of her fingers and put them inside her orifices before dumping her

WARNING: GRAPHIC CONTENT

The identity of the man who slaughtered his wife in front of their three young children before dumping her body in an empty lot will never be known, not even to the prisonmates he'll spend the rest of his life with.

Only a select few - his traumatised children, the horrified Supreme Court judge that presided over his trail, and a handful of disgusted journalists - know the face and name of the Islamic State sympathiser who murdered his wife.

ADVERTISEMENT

The case against RB, a pseudonym given to the 36-year-old killer, was one that horrified the Melbourne suburb of Broadmeadows, judge Lex Lasry, and even the man's own defence council as it was revealed .

It shook the country and made locals questioning how a man living in their midst could be so violent as it was revealed he plucked his wife's eye out, sliced open her genitals and raped her before brutally taking her life.

The ISIS-sympathiser father, 36, (pictured) brutally murdered the 27-year-old mother in their Broadmedows home

In handing down the sentence judge Lasry described the killer's actions as:' Grotesquely violent... horrific,' and 'disgusting.'

The 27-year-old woman had a short life marred by abuse from a husband that would culminate in her gruesome death.

At a young age she was sent to Lebanon to meet and marry the man who would eventually butcher her. The whole thing was arranged and carried out within two weeks.

Click here to resize this module

The family members of the victim, who was the eldest of 10 children, would later say that before she left for Lebanon she was 'strong,' before she had been broken by her new husband.From the very moment they returned home to Australia, the judge wrote that he 'dominated' his wife.

'Dictating who she could see, what clothes she could wear and what domestic work you required her to do.'

he dumped her body in the bushes at the Dallas tennis club (pictured) where a jogger found it in the morning

Three years after the newlyweds returned to Australia, she gave birth to their first child and he took a second wife 'in a ceremony presided over by a local sheik'.

His second wife fled after six weeks of enduring his controlling and abusive behaviour.

He already showed signs of paranoia and told the Islamic Sheikh who married them that she was not a real Muslim but an ASIO spy.

'[He] said that I was too intelligent to be a normal Muslim woman, and that I had to be an ASIO agent who was a spy,' she told a court in March last year.

'Sheikh just raised his eyebrows and looked at me and didn't say anything.'

His second wife also became the target of his: 'Domination, emotional abuse and physical assaults,' before she took her young son and left.

His first wife stayed, bearing two more children to him before the abuse escalated into a cruel and prolonged murder.

'You attacked your wife in front of your three children with a knife; repeatedly slashing, stabbing and cutting her to her face and body,' the judge wrote.

ADVERTISEMENT

Two of the children watched as their father ripped their mothers right eye out and flushed it down the toilet.

They watched as he cut off her fingers and put them insider her lower orifices.

They watched as he told them she “looked like Dajjal” - an Islamic anti-Christ, with her eye missing.

Now the ISIS-obsessed man has been sentenced to life behind bars, for a murder that even the judge said horrified him (stock image)

And they watched as he wrapped her body in a blanket, a plastic sheet and electrical tape and bundled it into the back of the family Corolla.

They would later tell mortified police that their father 'slaughtered’ their mother by using a ‘big white knife.'

He put the children in the car and drove to the nearby Dallas tennis club where he buried her body under the cover of darkness.

On the way home he stopped at an all-night bakery and brought the children pastries using their mothers card.

The next morning, a jogger found the body in the bushes. The police were called, forensics arrived but the body had suffered so many stab wounds that they could not at first determine it's gender.

Many of her injuries had been inflicted over a long period. The body mapped out each vicious beating, it showed months of abuse.

Her jaw was fractured, her skull was split, her teeth broken and her small bowel was damaged. The pathologist could see she most likely died from blood loss but they still couldn't identify her.

After 17 days police arrived on the killer's doorstep. They were there because an anonymous person had tipped them off to the welfare of the children.

Police arrested him on the spot, not for the brutal murder of the children's mother but for the abuse he had clearly inflicted on the them.

They were bruised, malnourished and dehydrated. One, a little girl, had burns from a hot iron on her body.

They were living in squalor, their beds soaked through with urine. One of the children's nappy, unchanged in days.

The children, now aged four, six and eight watched as their father gouged out their mother's right eye and flushed it down the toilet of their Broadmeadows, Melbourne, home

Two days late police realised the children's mother was missing and the mystery behind the mutilated body unravelled.

DNA tests from the children confirmed it was her.

The pathologist later paired the wounds to the instruments in the house. A white handled knife, some cleavers, an axe and a pair of scissors had left the different markings on the body.

ADVERTISEMENT

She was alive when he cut out her eye and he had raped her during the murder.

The defence claimed his actions were influenced by a meth-induced psychosis.

The prosecutor argued his extremist Islamic beliefs had influenced the killer.

In sentencing Judge Lasry wrote that even to him, the reasons behind the brutal murder weren't clear.

'In a case as violent as this, the Court and community will look for some reason which might explain your appalling conduct.'

'However, the primary motivation remains unclear to me.'

One thing he could see clearly, he wrote, was that the man showed absolutely no remorse.

'You have displayed no regret or remorse for something you accept you have done,' he told RB.