We are on FACEBOOK!:









S upport the American Patriot Party :



F ree Memb ership : http://www.americanpatriotparty.cc/Join/join.html



Donate and support the American Patriot Party today!: http://www.americanpatriotparty.cc/Donate/donate.html



We also strongly advocate s upporting both the Jo hn Birch Society: http://www.jbs.org and the Constitution Society as well: http://www.constitution.org for th eir vast available f ree records and documents of the Founders.





American Patriot Party Suggested Reading:



1.) Virginia & Kentu cky Resolutions, 17 98 - J ames Madison & Tho mas Jefferson



2.) Virginia Ratifying Convention , 6-16-1778 - Numerous Founders



3.) Absolute Rights of the Colonists, 1772 - Samuel Adams



4. ) Seco nd Treatise on C ivil Government, 1689 - John Locke



When you have studied these pages you can begin to understand freedom and

limited government.



Our ability to educate others depends on support from citizens promoting freedom

like you.



Support t he only party that actually follows the Constitution as it was intended .



No other party or organ ization will do this, not one.





Compare us to other parties : T he American Patriot Party believes in Constitutional and Common Law Carry of arms for bearing and concealment ; for preservation of self , family, commun ity, freedoms , liberties and property. the Founders hid th eir cannons, munitions and arms from their government, clearly indicat ing concealment without registration is an inalienable right





-------------------------





HAVE YOUR STATE JOIN THE GROWING NUMBER OF STATES THAT REQUIRE NO RE GIST RATION FOR CONCEALED OR OPEN CARRY AND ARE PASSING "CONSTITUTIONAL CARRY ".



13 States are already unrestricted, Oklahoma and Texas are on th eir way, how a bout your state?





Yes, they did have guns like t hat in 1776 . Above is the 1718 Puckle Machine Gun, 73 years BEFORE th e S econd Amen dment!



Wa tch Video of this gun: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GPC7KiYDshw



T wo of these weapons w e re purchased (without govern ment registration as with all gun purchases at that time) from Puckle, himself a citizen attorney inventor, by the 2nd Duke of Montagu .



George Washington's call for the C ITIZENS to manufacture and have readily at hand military grade weaponry First Annual Message to Congress, January 8, 1790 for the defense of their freedoms and liberties . See Quotes Below on this page .



T he A merican Patriot Party supports formation and armament of Citizens Militias (all citizens) as intended by the Founders. It is th e responsibility of the states and federal government to train and arm the Citizen militias (See: Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788); Once traine d, military members of the US armed forces have the duty to continue their service as members of the citizen militia where the y reside with those that have not ha d military service , work to train them, and to take their place as James Madison indicates in Federalist #46 as a opposing force to the standing military they once served as well as that of for eign aggression ; This is to balance and check the power of our limited government(s). This is not a anti -government stand, or anti - military stand ; this is a Constitutional check against the misuse of power by governments acting under a pretense of a uthority and outside those limited delegated powers given them . Note that if the federal government fails to arm and train the citizens, it is the right and duty of the state, local communities and or citizens to do so - including the right to import arms; including to import arms outside the federal prete nse of control - which by the Bill of Rights 2 nd Amendment, the federal government has no control regarding arms (See: Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788).



George Mason Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788: "...His fears, as he had before expressed, were, that grievous punishments ( LAWS and Laws against guns etc. ) would be inflicted, in order to render the service disagreeable to the (Citizen) militia themselves , and induce them to wish its abolition, which would afford a PRETEN S E for establishing a standing army . ..." (APP Note: This has already happened);



J ohn Marshall : "....If Congress neglect our militia (citizens), " we can arm them OURSELVES ". CANNOT (the state and or people of) Virginia "import arms? Cannot she put them into the hands of "HER" militia-men? He then concluded by observing , that the power of governing the militia was NOT vested in the states by implication , because, being " possessed of it " " antecedent to the adoption of the government , and " not being divested of it " by any grant or restriction in the Constitution, they must necessarily be as " FULLY possessed of it as ever they had been .> And it could NOT be said that the states derived ANY powers from that (the federal government or Constitution) system , " but RETAINED them ," >>>>>>>>" though not acknowledged in ANY part of it" . "



See F ederalist #46 - Ja mes Madison : A 25 to 1 Civilian Power Ratio over the Standing Army (MILITARY) is the "minimum power ratio" in any free country and the true defini tion of what a MILITIA is.



".....The highest number to which, according to the best computation, a standing army can be carried in any country, does not exceed one hundredth part of the whole number of souls; or one twenty-fifth part of the number able to bear arms. This proportion would not yield, in the United States, an army of more than twenty-five or thirty thousand men.



"TO THESE" (The United States Military) WOULD BE "OPPOSED" A (CITIZEN) "MILITIA" amounting to near half a million of "CITIZENS" with "ARMS IN THEIR HANDS", OFFICERED BY MEN CHOSEN FROM "AMONG THEMSELVES " ( CHOSEN BY THE LOCAL CITIZEN'S - NOT MILITARY OR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT - THE TRUE DEFINITION OF MILITIA ) , fighting for their (THE CITIZEN'S) common liberties, and united and conducted by governments possessing their (THE CITIZEN MILITIA'S) affections and confidence.



It may well be doubted, whether a (CITIZEN) MILITIA "thus circumstanced" (25 to 1 ARMED POWER RATIO) could ever be conquered by such a (SMALL) proportion of " regular troops " (i.e. federal US ARMY, NAVY, AIR FORCE, MARINES). ...."



Read Federa list #46 in full below on this page .... Get educated.





To send support , s ee our Donations p age:



-------------------------



Ben Swann - Truth in Media: W HO Created ISIS:



U PDATED - Video Links: 1.) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anPvNMDNpFQ

2.) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SK7jbxBQATw

3.) Christians fight back: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WnbGaquONic

4.) US Creates ISIS: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CnkWYggHsy8









New s:



1 . Freedom of Speech Under Attack by Paul Joseph Wa tson: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XDxRlsBi4Ac













-------------





World Immigration News and Related Videos - a MUST READ!:



When governments deny the existence of a radical violent religious culture and devious acts of war; and not only invite it, but inject it, into their country.



War is imminent when the governments establish the condition of it.



John Locke, "Second Treatise on Civil Government 1698"



Chapter 19: Of the Dissolution of Government



#211. HE that will, with any clearness, speak of the dissolution of government, ought in the first place to distinguish between the dissolution of the society and the dissolution of the government ..."



#217. Fourthly, the delivery also of the people into the subjection of a foreign power, either by the prince or by the legislative, is certainly a change of the legislative , and so a dissolution of the government . For the end why people entered into society being to be preserved one entire, free, independent society to be governed by its own laws, this is lost whenever they are given up into the power of another. ..."





Read John Locke "Second Treatise on Civil Government 1689" http://www.americanpatriotparty.cc/Locke_Civil_Government/locke_civil_government.html and http://www.americanpatriotparty.cc/Locke_Church_State_Man/locke_church_state_man.html so that you can understand the principles of toleration that the Governments of Europe, Britain and the United States have quite apparently forgot.



Toleration has limits.



John Locke on Treatise on Toleration: http://www.americanpatriotparty.cc/Locke_Church_State_Man/locke_church_state_man.html



"...#71. Again: That Church can have no right to be tolerated by the magistrate which is constituted upon such a bottom that all those who enter into it do thereby ipso facto deliver themselves up to the protection and service of another prince. For by this means the magistrate would give way to the settling of a foreign jurisdiction in his own country and suffer his own people to be listed, as it were, for soldiers against his own Government. Nor does the frivolous and fallacious distinction between the Court and the Church afford any remedy to this inconvenience; especially when both the one and the other are equally subject to the absolute authority of the same person, who has not only power to persuade the members of his Church to whatsoever he lists, either as purely religious, or in order thereunto, but can also enjoin it them on pain of eternal fire. It is ridiculous for any one to profess himself to be a Mahometan only in his religion, but in everything else a faithful subject to a Christian magistrate, whilst at the same time he acknowledges himself bound to yield blind obedience to the Mufti of Constantinople, who himself is entirely obedient to the Ottoman Emperor and frames the feigned oracles of that religion according to his pleasure. But this Mahometan living amongst Christians would yet more apparently renounce their government if he acknowledged the same person to be head of his Church who is the supreme magistrate in the state.



#72. Lastly, those are not at all to be tolerated who deny the being of a God. Promises, covenants, and oaths, which are the bonds of human society, can have no hold upon an atheist. The taking away of God, though but even in thought, dissolves all; besides also, those that by their atheism undermine and destroy all religion, can have no pretence of religion whereupon to challenge the privilege of a toleration. As for other practical opinions, though not absolutely free from all error, if they do not tend to establish domination over others, or civil impunity to the Church in which they are taught, there can be no reason why they should not be tolerated.



#73. It remains that I say something concerning those assemblies which, being vulgarly called and perhaps having sometimes been conventicles and nurseries of factions and seditions, are thought to afford against this doctrine of toleration. But this has not happened by anything peculiar unto the genius of such assemblies, but by the unhappy circumstances of an oppressed or ill-settled liberty. These accusations would soon cease if the law of toleration were once so settled that all Churches were obliged to lay down toleration as the foundation of their own liberty, and teach that liberty of conscience is every man's natural right, equally belonging to dissenters as to themselves; and that nobody ought to be compelled in matters of religion either by law or force. The establishment of this one thing would take away all ground of complaints and tumults upon account of conscience; and these causes of discontents and animosities being once removed, there would remain nothing in these assemblies that were not more peaceable and less apt to produce disturbance of state than in any other meetings whatsoever. But let us examine particularly the heads of these accusations. "..."



-------



Samuel Adams in "The Absolute Rights of the Colonists, 1772 " http://www.americanpatriotparty.cc/Rights_of_the_Colonists/rights_of_the_colonists.html summarizes these limits:



Samuel Adams : "In regard to Religeon, mutual tolleration in the different professions thereof, is what all good and candid minds in all ages have ever practiced; and both by precept and example inculcated on mankind: And it is now generally agreed among christians that this spirit of toleration in the fullest extent consistent with the being of civil society "is the chief characteristical mark of the true church"1 & In so much that "Mr. Locke" has asserted, and "proved beyond the possibility of contradiction on any solid ground", that such toleration ought to be extended to all whose doctrines are not subversive of society. The only Sects which he thinks ought to be, and which by all wise laws are excluded from such toleration, are those who teach Doctrines subversive of the Civil Government under which they live. The Roman Catholicks or Papists are excluded by reason of such Doctrines as these "that Princes excommunicated may be deposed, and those they call Hereticks may be destroyed without mercy; besides their recognizing the Pope in so absolute a manner, in subversion of Government, by introducing as far as possible into the states, under whose protection they enjoy life, liberty and property, that solecism in politicks, Imperium in imperio2 (i.e. a Government within a Government) leading directly to the worst anarchy and confusion, civil discord, war and blood shed-- "



This limitation was called for because as Locke presented, following a religious leader from another country (at that time Popes that would have people killed in other countries for heresy) is like having a foreign soldiers following the orders of foreign leaders in your local state and community.



Freedom relies on a set of defined principles based upon the "Laws of Nature" and local interests of local communities for the purpose of local commonwealths; Not distant legislators or leaders.



John Locke: "Chapter 2: "...Of the State of Nature 4. To understand political power aright, and derive it from its original, we must consider what estate all men are naturally in, and that is, a state of perfect freedom to order their actions, and dispose of their possessions and persons as they think fit, within the bounds of the law of Nature, without asking leave or depending upon the will of any other man. A state also of equality, wherein all the power and jurisdiction is reciprocal, no one having more than another, there being nothing more evident than that creatures of the same species and rank, promiscuously born to all the same advantages of Nature, and the use of the same faculties, should also be equal one amongst another, without subordination or subjection,..."



6. But though this be a state of liberty, yet it is not a state of license ; though man in that state have an uncontrollable liberty to dispose of his person or possessions, yet he has not liberty to destroy himself, or so much as any creature in his possession, but where some nobler use than its bare preservation calls for it. The "State of Nature" has a "Law of Nature" to govern it, which obliges every one, and REASON, which is that law, teaches all mankind who will but consult it, that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty or possessions; for men being all the workmanship of one omnipotent and infinitely wise Maker; all the servants of one sovereign Master, sent into the world by His order and about His business; they are His property, whose workmanship they are made to last during His, not one another's pleasure.



And, being furnished with like faculties, sharing all in one community of Nature, there cannot be supposed any such subordination among us that may authorise us to destroy one another, as if we were made for one another's uses, as the inferior ranks of creatures are for ours. Every one as he is bound to preserve himself, and not to quit his station wilfully, so by the like reason, when his own preservation comes not in competition, ought he as much as he can to preserve the rest of mankind, and not unless it be to do justice on an offender, take away or impair the life, or what tends to the preservation of the life, the liberty, health, limb, or goods of another.



7. And that all men may be restrained from invading others' rights, and from doing hurt to one another, and the law of Nature be observed, which willeth the peace and preservation of all mankind, the execution of the law of Nature is in that state put into every man's hands, whereby every one has a right to punish the transgressors of that law to such a degree as may hinder its violation. For the Law of Nature would, as all other laws that concern men in this world, be in vain if there were nobody that in the State of Nature had a power to execute that law, and thereby preserve the innocent and restrain offenders; and if any one in the state of Nature may punish another for any evil he has done, every one may do so. For in that state of perfect equality, where naturally there is no superiority or jurisdiction of one over another, what any may do in prosecution of that law, every one must needs have a right to do.



8. And thus, in the state of Nature, one man comes by a power over another, but yet no absolute or arbitrary power to use a criminal, when he has got him in his hands, according to the passionate heats or boundless extravagancy of his own will, but only to retribute to him so far as calm reason and conscience dictate, what is proportionate to his transgression, which is so much as may serve for reparation and restraint. For these two are the only reasons why one man may lawfully do harm to another, which is that we call punishment. In transgressing the law of Nature, the offender declares himself to live by another rule than that of reason and common equity, which is that measure God has set to the actions of men for their mutual security, and so he becomes dangerous to mankind; the tie which is to secure them from injury and violence being slighted and broken by him, which being a trespass against the whole species, and the peace and safety of it, provided for by the law of Nature, every man upon this score, by the right he hath to preserve mankind in general, may restrain, or where it is necessary, destroy things noxious to them, and so may bring such evil on any one who hath transgressed that law, as may make him repent the doing of it, and thereby deter him, and, by his example, others from doing the like mischief. And in this case, and upon this ground, every man hath a right to punish the offender, and be executioner of the law of Nature."



The Principle of Freedom added by Samuel Adams is this: "If men through fear, fraud or mistake, should in terms renounce and give up any essential natural right, the eternal law of reason and the great end of society, would absolutely vacate such renunciation; the [Volume 5, Page 396] right to freedom being the gift of God Almighty, it is not in the power of Man to alienate this gift, and voluntarily become a slave--"



This is the most important addition to the definition of true freedom, as no individual can give up the laws of nature and allow himself to give up (voluntary slavery), or allow others to accept his relinquishment (Slavery), of those rights to any one, or any religion, or any government, or any leader; Period.



Freedom requires consent, but you cannot consent to give up any inalienable right that keeps you free.



Here are a few videos taken from Y outube for your review and see if you can recognize that there are those that will misuse freedom to take away your freedoms.



Ron Paul had the correct statement to our military presence in Iraq; "We marched them over there, we can march them back";



And ask yourself regarding the below videos, would not the same answer by reversing the actions of governments that created this problem be the solution; and let them improve their own countries to their liking if that is what they truly wish to do.



This has nothing to do with racism; it has to do with freedom and free societies vs a religion that does not respect or recognize either; and mirrors the condition that old world Catholics and Papists imposed on those that sought refuge in the new world from religious persecution.



It is also about governments whose purpose is to protect private property , vacating that purpose by placing huge tax burdens upon the propert ies , societ y and earnings of its citizens. This change of pur pose is, by a ll definitions of civil society and explained by John Locke, an act of war agains t their own citizens; and can in no way be an act of a represen tative government :





John Locke Second Treatise on Civil Government:



Locke: " #222. The reason why men enter into society is the preservation of their property ; and the end while they choose and authorise a legislative is that there may be laws made, and rules set, as guards and fences to the properties of all the society , to limit the power and moderate the dominion of every part and member of the society. For since it can never be supposed to be the will of the society that the legislative should have a power to destroy that which every one designs to secure by entering into society , and for which the people submitted themselves to legislators of their own making: whenever the legislators endeavour to take away and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselves into a state of war with the people , who are thereupon absolved from any farther obedience, and are left to the common refuge which God hath provided for all men against force and violence . Whensoever, therefore, the legislative shall transgress this fundamental rule of society, and either by ambition, fear , folly , or corruption ,...



(APP Note: See this in Samuel Adams Statement within the Rights of the Colonists, 1772: "If men through fear , fraud or mistake , should in terms renounce and give up any essential natural right, the eternal law of reason and the great end of society, would absolutely vacate such renunciation; the right to freedom being the gift of God Almighty, it is not in the power of Man to alienate this gift, and voluntarily become a slave.")



...endeavour to grasp themselves , or " put into the hands of any other " (which they do when they force support of immigrants from the money derived from their citizens property and labor), an absolute power over the lives, liberties, and estates of the people, by this "breach of trust" they forfeit the power the people had put into their hands for quite contrary ends , and it devolves to the people, who have a right to resume their original liberty , and by the establishment of a new legislative (such as they shall think fit), provide for their own safety and security, (APP Note: See this in the Declaration of Independence) which is the end for which they are in society.... "



Macron s ets stage for a French civil war and promotes a EU army to subdue it.



As Germany wreaths from the agony of EU mandated uncontrolled mass immigration and president Merkels disregaurd to it's citizen's anguish of the establishment and digging in of Islamic fundamentalists, French president Macron, French socialist, takes strides in destroying his own country to step up in power in the European Union (EU); Favoring mass immigration and ignoring the cries of his French countrymen.



See: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-46108633



Bone chilling speech about threat of Islam in Europe

https://ok.ru/video/10318775568



Must See! Crazy European Immigration Crisis :

(thi s link has been consistently Removed from Youtube - Please Copy Video)

New Link: https://ok.ru/video/10318775568



Europe’s migration crisis may swing Sweden to the right:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AShK42vPUcA



Europe’s migration crisis may swing Sweden to the right:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AShK42vPUcA





Storming Spain's Razor-Wire Fence: Europe Or Die (Episode 1/4)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmqOlxNQABI





ISLAM IN EUROPE AND USA SHOCKING MUST SEE

https://player.vimeo.com/video/229136690



Germany Erupts Into Chaos As Protesters Declare "Rapefugees Not Welcome" - Cologne NYE

https://gloria.tv/post/aK73oHXjkDWc4Wb2ca4RdvsuU



Anti-Islamist Riots in Germany: Hooligans Against Salafists

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRZiTreKcCk







Anti-Islamists Demonstrate in Britain:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJaiJ_maUEY







Swe den Migrant Crisis - Swe den is a Puppy that does not know it is playing with a Tiger.

https://www.facebook.com/JohnBirchSociety/videos/190487862279018





FOX NEWS: Migrants to Sweden and all of Europe Invite Civil War from culture clash:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JBd4Ym-ci8



Sweeds expossed to Multiculturism: http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/22766"





JBS Word to the wise regarding ANTIFA, Alt Right and Antifa pro tests.



https://www.facebook.com/JohnBirchSociety/videos/embed/190487862279018



On YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4MClPjBJGCM





American Patriot Party is now posting on FACEBOOK with informative videos and insight to today's issues and events. https://www.facebook.com/pages/American-Patriot-Party-CC-National-Headquarters/174074706883







Remember to share our Facebook link, our articles and "LIKE" our page before returning! Help spread the word. Educate Yourself to the Constitution as it is correctly defined by the Founders in the Ratifying Conventions; Then Educate Others!



-------------------------





WARNING: United Nations attempting to control United States Citizen's Sovereignty again in :



UNITED NATIONS AGENDA 2030: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld



The United Nations is acting as a DISTANT LEGISLATURE to assume power over sovereign nations and remove power from citizens and place them under the direction and power of those people directing and controlling the United Nations.



Remember, ruling by Distant Legislatures, collectivism, socialism and creating dependency are what endanger our freedom's and liberties, as there can be NO representation by Distant Legislatures:



Samuel Adams, Absolute Rights of the Colonists, 1772:

In Full: http://www.americanpatriotparty.cc/Rights_of_the_Colonists/rights_of_the_colonists.html:



".....Now what liberty can there be, where property is taken away without " consent "?



Can it be said with any colour of truth and Justice, that this Continent of three thousand miles in length, and a breadth as yet unexplored, in which however, its supposed, there are five millions of people, has the least voice, vote or influence in the decisions of the British Parliament? Have they, all together, any more right or power to return a single member to that house of commons, who have not inadvertently, but DELIBERATELY assumed a power to dispose of their lives, 8 Liberties and properties , than to choose an Emperor of China! Had the Colonists a right to return members to the British parliament, it would only be hurtfull; as from their local situation and circumstances it is impossible they should be ever truly and properly represented there . The inhabitants of this country in all probability in a few years will be more numerous, than those of Great Britain and Ireland together; yet it is absurdly expected [Volume 5, Page 397] by the promoters of the present measures, that these, with their posterity to all generations, should be easy while their property, shall be disposed of by a house of commons at TH REE THOUSAND MILES DISTANT from them ;



and who cannot be supposed to have the least care or concern for their real interest: Who have not only "NO natural care for their interest", but must be in effect "BRIBED AGAINST IT "; as every burden they lay on the colonists is so much saved or gained to themselves. Hitherto many of the Colonists have been free from Quit Rents; but if the breath of a british house of commons can originate an act for taking away all our money, our lands will go next or be subject to rack rents from haughty and relentless landlords who will ride at ease, while we are trodden in the dirt. The Colonists have been branded with the odious names of traitors and rebels, only for complaining of their grievances; How long such treatment will, or ought to be born is submitted. "



--------



What is it that dissolves governments that are suppose to defend our liberties? John Locke presents this scenario:



--------



John Lock - Second Treatise on Civil Government - 1689 :



"...#212. Besides this overturning from without, governments are dissolved from within:



First. When the legislative is altered , ... When any one, or more, shall take upon them to make laws whom the people have not appointed so to do, they make laws without authority, which the people are not therefore bound to obey; by which means they come again to be out of subjection, and may constitute to themselves a new legislative, as they think best , being in full liberty to resist the force of those who, without authority, would impose anything upon them . Every one is at the disposure of his own will, when those who had, by the "delegation" of the society, the declaring of the public will, are excluded from it, and others usurp the place who have no such authority or delegation . "



-------- -



APP N OTE :



See Thomas Jefferson in the Kentucky Resolutions 1798:

Read i n Full: http://www.americanpatriotparty.cc/candidates



"... 2. " Resolved , That the Constitution of the United States, having delegated to Congress (the f ederal government) a power to punish:



a.) treason,

b.) counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States,

c.) piracies, and felonies committed on the high seas, and

d.) offenses against the law of nations,



and >>>> NO OTHER CRIMES >>>" WHATSOEVER ";



and it being true as a general principle , and one of the amendments to the Constitution having also declared, that "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution , not prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively , or to the people ,"



therefore the act of Congress, passed on the 14th day of July, 1798, and intituled "An Act in addition to the act intituled An Act for the punishment of certain crimes against the United States," as also the act passed by them on the — day of June, 1798, intituled "An Act to punish frauds committed on the bank of the United States," (>>>> and ALL their OTHER ACTS which assume to CREATE , DEFINE , or PUNISH crimes , OTHER than THOSE so "ENUMERATED" in the Constitution ,) >>> are " ALTOGETHER " " VOID ", and of " NO FORCE ";



and that the power to create, define, and punish such other crimes is reserved, and, of right, appertains SOLELY and EXCLUSIVELY to the respective "STATES", each within its own territory..."



To guard agains t states giving away or taking your rights and prepared to def end your rights , states need to be :



1.) small to give Adequate R epresentation , and

2.) strong to oppose the corruption of D istant (Federal and International) Legislatures .



----------



L OCKE CONTINUED :



#213. This being usually brought about by such in the commonwealth, who misuse the power they have ,..."



#217. Fourthly, the delivery also of the people into the subjection of a foreign power , either by the prince ( presi dent/executive) or by the legislative, is certainly a change of the legislative , and so a dissolution of the government . For the end why people entered into society being to be preserved one entire, free, independent society to be governed by its OWN laws, this is lost whenever they are given up into the power of ANOTHER . "



---------



APP NOTE: The United States are actually Sovereign Independent States, each with their own republic (Which even smaller independent republics can be created i.e. divided and formed into smaller independent states as provided under the Constitution to give adequate representation) - The Constitution does not take that away, as the Constitution is a very LIMITED "COMPACT" See Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788 http://www.americanpatriotparty.cc/americanpatriotpartynewsletter and Virginia Resolutions 1798 http://www.americanpatriotparty.cc/candidates-



Virginia Resolution of 1798

Read in Full: http://www.americanpatriotparty.cc/candidates



James Madison:



"... RESOLVED, That the General Assembly of Virginia, doth unequivocably express a firm resolution to maintain and defend the CONSTITUTION of the United States , AND the CONSTITUTION OF THIS STATE , against every aggression either foreign or domestic , and that they will support " the government " of the United States in all measures " WARRANTED" by "the former ".



That this assembly most solemnly declares a warm attachment to the Union of the "States" , to maintain which it pledges all its powers; and that for this end, it is their duty to watch over and oppose every infraction of those principles which constitute the "only basis" of that Union , because a faithful observance of them, can alone secure it's existence and the public happiness.



That this Assembly doth explicitly and peremptorily declare, that it views the powers of the federal government, as resulting from the compact, to which the states are parties; as limited by the "plain sense and intention" of the instrument constituting the "compact" ; as NO further valid that they are authorized by the grants "ENUMERATED" in "THAT COMPACT" ; and that in case of a deliberate, palpable, and dangerous exercise of other powers, not granted by the said COMPACT , the STATES who are parties thereto, have the right, and are in DUTY bound, to interpose for arresting the progress of the "EVIL" , and for maintaining within their respective limits , the authorities, rights and liberties appertaining to them.



That the General Assembly doth also express its DEEP REGRET , that a spirit has in sundry instances, been manifested by the federal government, to "enlarge its powers by FORCED constructions" of the constitutional charter which defines them;



and that implications have appeared of a "design" to "EXPOUND" certain >>>"GENERAL "PHRASES" (which having been copied from the very limited grant of power, in the former articles of confederation were the less liable to be misconstrued) so as to destroy the meaning and effect, of the particular "ENUMERATION" which NECESSARILY EXPLAINS AND LIMITS THE GENERAL PHRASES ;



and so as to consolidate the states by degrees, into " ONE SOVEREIGNTY " (APP: i.e. " ONE NATION " - N O WHERE INTENDED by the Founders ) , the obvious tendency and INEVITABLE CONSEQUENCE of which would be,



to >>>" TRANSFORM " the present "republican" "SYS TEM" (of which there are numerous "independent Republics") of the United State"s", into "an absolute", or "at best" a MIXED >>>"MONARCHY" . ..."



----------



(APP: a "M ixed Monarchy" is a ruling class which we can see emerging today with two Clintons and three Bush's attempting to monopolize the presidency and control of the United States - this was warned by George Mason in the Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788)



----------



W E ARE NOT O NE NATION :



The above Founders documents show we are NOT " One Sovereignty " and we are NOT " One Nation " ;



T his " O ne Nation" phrase was created by a SOCIALIST Francis Bellamy - See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Bellamy in 1892 ;



SOCIALIST Francis Bellamy served as founding vice president and wrote several articles for the Society of Christian Socialists ' newspaper, "the Dawn" ;



The Pledg e of Allegiance that was written by the SOCIALIST Francis Bellamy , See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pledge_of_Allegiance





W hen compared with the Founders Original intent as spoken by James Madison above in the Virginia Resolutions 1798 and in The Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788 sho w how far we have strayed from the true definition of free republics , liberty and freedom as defined in the O riginal Founding D ocuments and Original LIMITED Constitutional COMPACT .



O ur states when they transfer undelegated powers to the federal government and federal governments, dissolve themselves when they a ttempt to make us "One Nation " , OR when either of them attempt to transfer the authority given to them into the hands of the United Nations as clearly explained here by Locke .



A more accurate ple dg e would be one that would follow the written intent and principles of freedom and indicate the flag follows those principles, and one that w ould not lend itself to blind nationalism; or blindly following a image of a flag w hose legislatures change the mea ning of on a regular basis; o r to any such blind national socialism ;



This pledge would be and we propose:







New Pledge of Allegiance :



"I pledge allegiance to those Inalienable Rights respecti ng the Laws of Nature, which defines the Flag of the United States of America;



and to protecting our Free Common Law Societies in which they consen t to form; Independent State Republics, United under God, with liberty and justice for all."



Richard Taylor - American Patriot Party





----------





LOCKE CONTINUED:



#220. In these, and the like cases, when the government is DISSOLVED , the people are at liberty to provide for themselves by erecting a new legislative differing from the other by the change of persons, or form, or both, as they shall find it most for their safety and good. For the society can never, by the fault of another, lose the native and original right it has to preserve itself , which can only be done by a settled legislative and a fair and impartial execution of the laws made by it. But the state of mankind is not so miserable that they are not capable of using this remedy till it be too late to look for any. To tell people they may provide for themselves by erecting a new legislative, when, by oppression, artifice, or being delivered over to a foreign power, their old one is gone, is only to tell them they may expect relief when it is too late, and the evil is past cure. This is, in effect, no more than to bid them first be slaves, and then to take care of their liberty, and, when their chains are on, tell them they may act like free men. This, if barely so, is rather mockery than relief, and men can never be secure from tyranny if there be no means to escape it till they are perfectly under it; and, therefore, it is that they have not only a right to get out of it, but to prevent it.



#221. There is, therefore, secondly, another way whereby governments are dissolved, and that is, when the legislative, or the prince, either of them act contrary to their trust.



For the legislative acts against the trust reposed in them when they endeavour to invade the property of the subject, and to make themselves, or any part of the community, masters or arbitrary disposers of the lives, liberties, or fortunes of the people.



#222. The reason why men enter into society is the preservation of their property; and the end while they choose and authorise a legislative is that there may be laws made, and rules set, as guards and fences to the properties of all the society , to limit the power and moderate the dominion of every part and member of the society. For since it can never be supposed to be the will of the society that the legislative should have a power to destroy that which every one designs to secure by entering into society , and for which the people submitted themselves to legislators of their own making: whenever the legislators endeavour to take away and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselves into a state of war with the people , who are thereupon absolved from any farther obedience, and are left to the common refuge which God hath provided for all men against force and violence . Whensoever, therefore, the legislative shall transgress this fundamental rule of society, and either by ambition, fear , folly , or corruption , ...



(APP Note: See this in Samuel Adams Statement within the Rights of the Colonists, 1772: "If men through fear , fraud or mistake , should in terms renounce and give up any essential natural right, the eternal law of reason and the great end of society, would absolutely vacate such renunciation; the right to freedom being the gift of God Almighty, it is not in the power of Man to alienate this gift, and voluntarily become a slave.")



endeavour to grasp themselves , or PUT INTO THE HANDS OF "ANY OTHER" , an absolute power over the lives, liberties, and estates of the people, by this BREACH OF TRUST they forfeit the power the people had put into their hands for quite contrary ends , and it devolves to the people, who have a right to resume their original liberty , and by the establishment of a new legislative (such as they shall think fit), provide for their own safety and security, (APP Note: See this in the Declaration of Independence) which is the end for which they are in society . What I have said here concerning the legislative in general holds true also concerning the supreme executor, who having a double trust put in him, both to have a part in the legislative and the supreme execution of the law, acts against both, when he goes about to set up his own arbitrary will as the law of the society. He acts also contrary to his trust when he employs the force, treasure, and offices of the society to corrupt the representatives and gain them to his purposes, when he openly pre-engages the electors, and prescribes, to their choice, such whom he has, by solicitation, threats, promises, or otherwise, won to his "designs" , and employs them to bring in such who have promised beforehand what to vote and what to enact. Thus to regulate candidates and electors, and new model the ways of election, what is it but to cut up the government by the roots, and poison the very fountain of public security? For the people having reserved to themselves the choice of their representatives as the fence to their properties , could do it for no other end but that they might always be freely chosen, and so chosen, freely act and advise as the necessity of the commonwealth and the public good should, upon examination and mature debate, be judged to require. This, those who give their votes before they hear the debate, and have weighed the reasons on all sides, are not capable of doing. To prepare such an assembly as this, and endeavour to set up the declared abettors of his own will, for the true representatives of the people, and the law-makers of the society, is certainly as great a breach of trust, and as perfect a declaration of a "design "..."



(APP Note: See this in the Declaration of Independence and compare 223-226:



" ... But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a "design" to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right , it is their duty , to THROW OFF such government and to provide new guards for their future security.)



L OCKE CONTINUED: " ...to subvert the government, as is possible to be met with . To which, if one shall add rewards and punishments visibly employed to the same end, and all the arts of perverted law made use of to take off and destroy all that stand in the way of such a >>"design" , and will not comply and consent to betray the liberties of their country , it will be past doubt what is doing . What power they ought to have in the society who thus employ it contrary to the trust that along with it in its first institution, is easy to determine; and one cannot but see that he who has once attempted any such thing as this cannot any longer be trusted ."







-------------------------





CBC SPECIAL REPORT: Global Warming Doomsday Called Off:





Part 1 of 5: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fr5O1HsTVgA

Part 2 of 5: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fD6VBLlWmCI

Part 3 of 5: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZS2eIRkcR0

Part 4 of 5: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIbTJ6mhCqk

Part 5 of 5: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2XALmrq3ro



The Great Global Warming Swindle:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52Mx0_8YEtg









John Locke - #201:

"It is a

mistake

to think this fault is proper only to monarchies. Other forms of government are liable to it as well as that;



for

WHEREVER

the power that is put in any hands for the government of the people and the

preservation of their properties

is applied to

" other ends "

,



and

made use of to "IMPOVERISH" , " HARASS" , or "SUBDUE" them to the ARBITRARY and IRREGULAR commands of

those that have it ,





THERE it presently becomes TYRANNY,





whether those that thus use it are one or many . Thus we read of the thirty tyrants at Athens, as well as one at Syracuse; and the intolerable dominion of the Decemviri at Rome was nothing better. " ..."









-------------------------







FROM DEBT - TO DEFENSELESSNESS - TO SLAVERY -

UNITED STATES FINANCES CHINA' S MILITARY BUDGET ON DEBT INTEREST ALONE



2013 DEBT to CHINA: 1 TRILLION 264.9 BILLION





http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_debt_of_the_United_States



http://www.politifact.com/virginia/statements/2011/apr/26/randy-forbes/randy-forbes-says-us-pays-china-739-million-day-de/



"...Forbes based his comments on fiscal 2011, in which the CBO estimates the government will spend $225 billion, or $616,438,356 per day, on interest payments. China held 12.1 percent of public debt at the end of February. So if the 2011 estimates hold and China holds the same proportion of debt throughout the year, it would receive about



$ 74.4 million per day . ..."







That is 26 BILLION 156 MILLION A YEAR IN INTEREST ALONE ALREADY PAID - BACK IN 2011 !!!



Investments the Chinese make with this money compounds the danger TEN FOLD TIMES TEN.



Free trade is fine.



Handing our Country for free to the Chinese or reducing our defense by empowering a Communist Country to our eventual demise is NOT.





Presently, the interest owed on money borrowed from China and being paid to China, is financing a large percentage of the CHINESE MILITARY.



Interest to the debt owed to China By 2020, if not curtailed, can and will finance the ENTIRE CHINESE ANNUAL MILITARY BUDGET :





http://carnegieendowment.org/2013/05/28/misconceptions-about-china-s-growth-in-military-spending/g76a



" As another example, in 2012 China published a defense budget of RMB 670.274 billion , with an increase from 2011 of RMB 67.604 billion and a growth rate of 11.2 percent. "



http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-03-05/china-boosts-defense-spending-as-military-modernizes-its-arsenal.html



2013: "....Military spending is set to rise this year to 740.6 billion yuan ($119 billion) from 669.1 billion yuan, the Ministry of Finance said in a report. China has the second-biggest military budget in the world after the U.S., which spent nearly six times more on defense than China last year and is now cutting those outlays. ..."





We are presently financing and arming our potential futu re enemies IN MASS .







-------------------------









CHINA ARMED BY US FEDERAL GOVERNMENT - W HILE UNITED STATES CITIZENS ARE DISAR MED BY STATE & US FEDERAL GOVERNMENT





APPARENTLY OUR STATE AND FEDERAL REPRESENTATIVES BELIEVE THE CHINESE MILITARY HAVE A GREATER RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS AND SELF PRESERVATION THAN THE CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES.



Our Federal and State SO CALLED Representatives are financing through wasteful spending, lavish salary raises and retirements, forced taxation to pay for forced UNION "MAXIMUM" WAGES, WASTEFUL CORPORATE CONTRACTS, UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND NEEDLESS UNENDING WARS and DEBT CREATED BY THESE to which the interest owed China is no w the Arming of Chinese with Machine guns, Tanks, Cannons, Missiles, Jet fighters and Nuclear Arsenals;



ALL WHILE passing laws here to prohibit citizens from from owning even a machine gun to defend ourselves, communities and countries .



How more stupid and ignorant can those "so called" "REPRESENTATIVES" "you" have elected be?



But it is a fact that these representatives are not "stupid and i gno rant", but fully aware a nd calculating;



These Representatives, every one, are guilty of rendering aid to our enemies;



These representatives, every one, are guilty of the crimes of treason; Those who support or protect them in any fashion bear the same title - your duty to a "job" does not exceed your DUTY to uphold the Constitution o r Essential Natural Rights which exceed even the Constitution as our Founders have established.



Neither retirement nor time can reduce these crimes the se corrupted representatives have already committed.







Are you ready to READ and LEARN ?





ARE YOU READY TO VOTE FOR ("so called" by the Socialist Collectives Left and Socialist Corporates Collectives False Right ) "RADICAL" Constitutionalism the Founders readily PRESCRIBED YET? ...YES? OR......Maybe you want to "wait" just a "little longer"?... and "hope" it gets "better"......



NO?



Then how ready are you to put the federal government back in it's " 10 MILE SQUARE BOX " intended for the federal government and all th eir "DEPARTMENTS" b efore they Enslave you to a point you cannot even defend yourself? Don't Know what >>>> " BOX " I speak of? ......... Are You Ready to Learn? .......Lets see if you are....



Virgina Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788:



JAMES MADISON : (Author of the Constitution) "Mr. Chairman: ...I CANNOT COMPREHEND that the (FEDERAL LEGISLATURES, EXECUTIVE, FEDERAL SUPREME COURT, FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND ALL THEIR "DEPARTMENT S" ) "power of LEGISLATING" over a " SMALL " " DISTRICT " (Washington , DC - DISTRICT CAPITOL),



which >>>"CANNOT EXCEED" >>>"TEN MILES SQUARE", ( I.E. ......THE >>>>>>> " BOX " ) and may >>>"NOT BE" more than "ONE" MILE, (Limit of Physical Structures ) will involve the DANGERS which he (Patrick Henry) apprehends . ... "



SEE THE PHYSICAL LIMITS OF THE FEDERAL GOV ERNMENT?



Gett ing smarter? Want to learn more? Keep Reading and Read the Links provided as well.



Right now, even those that are being propped up a s "Patriotic", are setting you up for another fall.



How? Because most of the Citizenry have never read what re al freedom is ; and they are using th at ignorance to set you up.



"RAND " Paul and i ncluding such other s as Matt Kibbe - Freed omworks, Mike Huckabee, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, Mark Levin and others ; who are promoting a UNCO NSTITUTIONAL "UN -ENUMERATED" FLAT SALES TAX or "FAIRTAX" that will "SH OE HORN" the federal governments control over the states and loca l communities;



Which is very foolish and IGNORANT.



See more on Taxes Below.



RAND Paul is also trying to establish and continue to empower "Undelegated federal powers of "certain crimes" to unconstitutionally regulate the states and local communities;



SUCH AS - EXCHANGING the regulating power practiced with Roe VS W ade with yet another UN-DELEGATED FEDERAL power over the states, "INSTEAD OF" s imply removing the "unconstitutional Federal Power" that enforces Roe vs Wad e and replace it with "NOTHING"; and then let the local communities regulate it ;



FACT: The Federal Government is LIMITED to DEFINING OR PROSECUTING "ONLY FOUR" CRIMES in the Constitution Article 1 - Section 8; and in NO UNCERTAIN TERMS in the Kentucky Resolutions - Par.#2) ; Any other power arrogates a unconstitutional power;



By placing the issues where they belong - WITH THE STATES AND LOCAL COMMUNITIES - it would resolve many of the "just issues" Rand wishes to accomplish;



Simply continuing to give issues to a federal court; Giving to it authority to decide where it has absolutely NO Constitutional authority, is not the way. This simply allows the federal government to arrogate or continue to arrogate undelegated powers under a "PRETENSE OF AUTHORITY".







CAUTION





NOTE THAT EVERY OTHER PARTY (and almost every talk show host and public figure ) is following and promoting d i stor ted and deceptive definitions of the Constitution. Claiming to defend the Constitution on one hand, while continuing to hack at the Constitution's roots with the other.



ONLY the AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY is following the Founders INTENT, Constitutional Ratified Blueprint, Common Law Definitions of True Free Societies and that of Independent Local and Well Representative Constitutional Republics.



Read us and see for yourself.



If you trust yourself to any other party or organizational leadership, yo u WILL be misled and dec ei ved.









TAXES





AN IMPORTANT MESSAGE FROM THE AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY ON TAXATION :



D O NOT BE TAKEN IN BY NEW TAX SCHEMES - SUCH AS THE NATIONA L FLAT TAX OR FAIRTAX ;



DO NOT LET OLD TAX SCHEMES SUCH AS THE IN COME TAX REMAIN.





THE INCOME TAX :



The INCOME TAX is not un constitutional because it was, or was not, Ratified by enough states (as often surmised );



The INCOME TAX IS "UNCONSTITUTIONAL" "BECAUSE" IT IS A EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED "ARROGATION" OF POWER - OUTSIDE THE LIMITED DELEGATED POWERS GRANTED.



THIS TYPE OF TAX "CANNOT BE RATIFIED" BY THE STATES TO AMEND THE CONSTITUTION AND ARROGATE A POWER "NO WH ERE INTENDED" UPON THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT .



Changing the "LIMITED" power of "ENUMERATED" taxation which is a DELEGATED POWER,



into a "UNLIMITED" "UN-ENUMERATED" form of taxation OUTSIDE the DELEGATED POWER, is an ARROGATION OF POWER. It is a "NEW POWER", EXPRESSLY PR OHIBITED.







READ WHERE THE FOUNDERS SAY THIS: Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788





PATRICK HENRY (WARNS): "... I conjure you once more to remember the admonition of that sage man who told you that, "when you give power , you know not what you give". I know the absolute necessity of an energetic government. But is it consistent with any principle of prudence or good policy to grant unlimited, unbounded authority, which is so totally unnecessary that gentlemen say it will "never be exercised"? But gentlemen say that we must make experiments . A wonderful and unheard-of experiment it will be, to give "unlimited power unnecessarily"! ..." " ...The experience of the world teaches me the jeopardy of giving enormous power. Strike this clause out of the form of the government, and how will it stand? Congress will still have power, by the sweeping (supremacy) clause , to make laws within that {438} place and the strongholds, independently of the local authority of the state. I ask you, if this clause be struck out, whether the sweeping clause will not enable them to protect themselves from insult. If you grant them these powers, you destroy " every degree of responsibility ". They will fully screen them from justice, and preclude the possibility of punishing them. No instance can be given of such a wanton grasp of power as an exclusive legislation "in all cases whatever"."





EDMUND PEND LETON : "...I understand that ( Supremacy - Sweeping) clause as NOT going a " SINGLE STEP BEYOND " the " DELEGATED powers" (APP: i .e. THE POWER IS LIMITED TO THE DELEGATED POWER S AND THESE CAN NEVER BE CHANGED - TH IS IS WHAT MAKES US A REPUBLIC UNDER A "ORIGINAL COMPACT" ) . What can it act upon? Some power given by "THIS" Constitution . If they should be about to pass a law in consequence of this clause, they must pursue some of the " DELEGATED powers ", but can by " NO MEANS " DEPART from them , (N) OR " ARROGATE " " ANY NEW " powers; for the PLAIN LANGUAGE of the clause is, to give them power to pass laws in order to give " effect " to the " DELEGATED " powers"."

GEORGE NICHOLAS : "... If I understand it right, NO " NEW " power can be exercised. "

JAMES MADISON : "....The honorable member (PATRICK HENRY) asks, Why ask for this power, and if the subsequent clause be not fully competent for the same purpose. If so, WHAT NEW TERRORS can arise from this particular clause ? It is only a superfluity.



If that " LATITUDE " of " CONSTRUCTION " which he contends for were to take place with respect to the "sweeping (supremac y Article 1 - Section 8 ) clause" , there " WOULD " be room for those HORRORS . But it gives "NO" supplementary power. It only enables them to execute the "DELEGATED powers".



" IF " the " DELEGATION " (SET LIMITATIONS) of their powers be " SAFE " (UN-CORRUPTED FROM THEIR ORIGINAL INTENT AND FORM ) , no possible inconvenience can arise from this clause. It is at most " BUT " explanatory.... "



GEORGE NICHOLAS : The gentleman last up (PATRIC K HENRY) says that the power of legislation includes every thing. A general power of legislation does. But this is a "special power" of legislation. Therefore, it does "NOT contain that plenitude of power which he imagines. They (The Federal Government, Executive, Federal Legislative and Federal Supreme Court) " CANNOT LEGISLATE" in "ANY case" but those " PARTICULARLY ENUMERATED " (DELEGATED) .



APP: The Ratifying and AMENDMENT PROCESSES of the Constitution were established to make changes "WITHIN" the DELEGATED powers;



These processes were to limit and correct unnecessary power and only WITHIN the DEL E GATED powers ;



T hese processes were NEVER MEANT to ARROGATE "NEW" POWERS upon the federal governm en t at the will of the state or federa l representatives outside of the very limited DELEGATED powers .









-------------------------





DANGER !







NATIONAL " FLAT TAX "

AND " FAIRTAX " " DECEPTION"







A NATIONAL "FLAT TAX" OR THE "FAIRTAX" WILL ENSLAVE YOU FURTHER;



ATTEMPTS ARE BEING MADE TO DECEIVE YOU BY NATIONAL CORPORATE / UNION MEDIA.



Mark Levin and other talk show hosts ( including RAND Paul - Flat Tax) are promoting the FairTax and or Flat Tax. DO NOT BE FOOLED! Like the Income Tax, these are UNENUMERATED tax schemes . Worse yet, the se tax schemes invite the federal government into your state to define "WHAT IS AND WHAT IS NOT A BUSINESS"! Using th is reasoning will allow the Fair Tax and Flat Ta x to invite and "shoehorn" the federal government right into your home and computer ; This is as everyt hing , including your person and labor, will be considered "a business"; opening everyone and everything to be scrutinized by the NEW JOINT Federal / State Hybrid form of the IRS Created by the FAIRTAX and FLAT TAX Systems . The FairTax and Flat Tax systems are BU Y, SELL and T RADE TAXES . They further do not get rid of the IRS, they simply change the name to a far more dangerous and invasive bureaucracy. They simply insure that the waste in government continue; Both tax schemes a re like the income t ax, they use jealousy to sell you into deeper slavery.



The people that are promoting these unconstitutional tax systems are also stating they are for obeying the Constitution. This is clear de c eption.



Remember - RAND PAUL IS NOT RON PAUL ;



R ON PAUL as with other true Constitutionalists understand the limitation of the Constitution and want to get rid of the IRS and Income tax and replace them with NOTHING !



This will change everything to the BETTER.



Mark Levin, Sean Ha n nity , Glenn Beck (all promoting the same corporate message), RAND PAUL and other republicans and democrats, as well as special interests such as FREEDOMWORKS, all want t o maintain the flow of FLAT PERCENTAGE U N- ENU MERATED TAX MONEY to the federal government by simply changing the FORM of the IRS. (Even though they "preach" differentl y ).



The Fair Tax and Flat Tax "Tax S ch emes" will CHANG E NOTHING ; But they will in fact make things WORSE ;



This is because it will give "more invasive power" to the federal government and "tighter grip" over your "local and state laws "!



You will jump from the frying pan into the FIRE !



Every gain in "other areas" agains t a tyrannical government will mean "NOTHING"; --- "UNLESS" the tyrannical grip upon the "purse string s" are "pried from their fingers"; and the power is returned to the states and local communities so that their CONSENT must be granted to an "ENUMERATED" TAX, " BEFORE " it is directed to be collected - as originally established in the Constitution.



Anything less, will allow the tyrannical government to finance and shield itself from necessary change which will return us to true representative government as the Founders intended.



For more, read our Opposition Issues Page .



Let these talk show hosts and representatives know that this is NOT THE WAY!



BE RELENTLESS!



YOU AND THEY - ARE BEING SET UP FOR A FALL!



-------





LET US REVIEW THE FACTS :





The Original Constitution was written to safeguard against such corruption and abuse of power. All taxati on had to be ENUMERATED BEFORE CONSEN SUALLY being collected, it was als o derived from imports, collected simply from viewing the finished product; so your business affairs, income and papers were private :



COMPARE:

-------

Original Constitution:



Artic le 1 Section 9: "No Capitation, or OTHER direct, Tax shall be laid, "UNLESS" in "Proportion to the Census or " ENUMERATION " herein " BEFORE " directed to be taken. "



....This allows you the time and mean s to grant your "CONSENT" before it is "taken".



-------



Amended Constitution:



Amendment XVI: "The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and "WITHOUT REGARD" to any census of "ENUMERATI ON" ."



T he Federal Government Takes your money FIRST in a "FLAT " PERCENT ... THEN decides what THEY are going to spend it on " AFTER " the y TAKE IT . ......"WITH OUT YOUR CON S ENT".



-------







Can y ou SEE THE NECESSITY of ENUMERATED TAXATION!!! ...The Founders did! !



SEE THE ARROGATED POWER?!



SUCH "UN-ENUMERATED" "FLAT PERCENTAGE" TA XATION TAKEN CONTROL OF FIRST, WHERE CONSENT IS NEAR IMP OSSIBLE TO BE OF ANY EFFECT, CAN " NEVER " BE "CONSTITUTIONAL" ;



AND "RATIFYING" SUCH TAXATION, CAN NEVER BE MADE TO "AMEND" THE CONSTITUTION.



NO MA TTER HOW MANY STATES "RATIFY IT"! .



NO MATTER WHAT YOU NAME IT.



NOTE: The income tax was found unconstitutional twice by the Supreme Court before corruption entered and renamed a direct tax a "indirect tax" and used as an excuse to arrogate new powers expressly prohibited - It is in fact still unconstitutional and still an new arrogated power; Further, ALL taxes are DIRECT; a " INDIRECT " tax is simply a "DIRECT" tax taken from you in a different way or made to be taken from you b y someone else first -



Redefining a tax as indirect is NO EXCUSE to tax you without your CONSENT or as a " MEANS " to arrogate a taxing and s pending power beyond the ver y limited DELEGATED powers.



Here the Founders establish that creating a new >>>>>>> "MEANS" to "ARROGATE" A NEW POWER (WAY) OF TAXATION is EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED .



-------



Virgi nia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788:



Mr. EDMUND PENDELTON : "....With respect to the necessity of the ten miles square (Washi ngton , DC) being superseded by the subsequent clause, which gives them (the federal government) power to "make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof" , I understand that clause as NOT going a " SINGLE STEP BEYOND " the " DELEGATED powers" . What can it act upon? Some power given by THIS Constitution . If they (the federal le gislature) should be about to pass a law in consequence of this clause, they must pursue some of the " DELEGATED powers ", but can by >>>>>>>" NO MEANS " DEPART from them , (N) OR " ARROGATE " (create) " ANY NEW " powers; for the PLAIN LANGUAGE of the clause is, to give them power to pass laws in order to give " effect " to the " DELEGATED " powers"."





See Also: "Declaration of Independence" - "17th Grievance" Quote below defining Taxation WITHOUT " CONSENT" is TYRANNY .



-------



If the federal government stayed within their "delegated" powers, funding the necessary expenditures and paying the national debt and national defense would be easy.



Force the federal government stay within the limited DELEGATED powers ; Force them by not funding them to be wasteful, manipulative and tyrannical;



Stop paying for your own enslavement and destruction.



Stop allowing State born Exclusive Privileges; Get Unions, Corporations and Tax Supported Special Interests out of Government.



Remove ALL Lobbyists from Washington DC . Limit them to your states where they must confront the local citizens of the state and not manipulate our state representatives in our national government in places far distant from the citizens that are most effected by any legislation.



Reduce the size of states so that there is adequate representation and not the manipulative government which occurs from "Distant Legislatures";

" NULLIFICATION " is "the proper remedy" when delegated powers have been exceeded.



See Thomas Jefferson shows us this "BY EXAMPLE" Kentucky Resolutions only a page and a half - CLICK AND READ IT!



See also our Segment "Republics and Representation".





-------



" REMOVE THE INCOME TAX " and REPLACE IT WITH " NOTHING " - " MAKE " THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT " OBEY THE CONSTITUTION " AS IT WAS " FIRST WRITTEN "!





SAY "NO" TO ANY NEW TAX SCHEME!





TAKING MONEY WITHOUT CONSENT IS OUTSIDE OF OUR LAWS; IT IS TYRANNY, THEFT AND CRIME.





"NULLIFICATION" "FORCES THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OBEY YOUR CONSENT" - USE IT.





ENFORCE THE RIGHT BY ENGAGING THE STATE AND COUNTY LAWS AND LOCAL JUDICIAL / POLICE FORCE.





-------



Declaration of Independence



The 17th Grievance Defining TYRANNY in Government:



17.) For imposing taxes on us " WITHOUT " "OUR" " CONSENT ";

------



Takin g money in a FLAT PERCENT FIRST , by ANY METHOD (incom e, sales etc.) ,



Then deciding how "they" (the government) will spend your money later, when there is " LITTLE or NO MEANS to say NO" ;



Can in " NO MEANS " be considered " consent" .





------



Learn More on our "APP Opposition Issues Page"!



Review also The Constitutional "A" Tax!



Feel Free to paste this article everywhere so long as it is in it's compl ete unchanged text and links. Check back as we occasionally update articles .

