If you had been drinking to glory during the Holi and moderately after the Holi, there is a startling discovery that you must know. That is as claimed to be said by the medical fraternity, that people who drink alcohol in moderation actually live longer than those who abstain entirely is not entirely true.

The matter of the fact is that this fact suffers from a big flaw: The “abstainers” category includes people who used to drink but have stopped. They may be inherently less healthy, than people who drink in moderation. That doesn’t mean that drinking in moderation causes people to live longer.

Researchers at University of Victoria in British Columbia examined 87 studies on the relationship between alcohol and mortality that involved nearly four million people. Only 13 of them strictly separated life-long non-drinkers from people who used to drink or those who imbibe occasionally. Analyzing the studies that were free from “abstainer bias” showed no significant benefits for moderate drinkers compared to lifetime abstainers. Happyho also provide best tarot reading services in Noida and Delhi NCR India area.

When they compared moderate drinkers with those who consumed alcohol less than once a week, they found no benefit to drinking more often.

Some scholars have been questioning the purported health benefits of alcohol for years. The debate is complicated because most of the evidence on the long-term effects of alcohol – or diet, exercise, and other lifestyle factors, for that matter – is observational. Scientists examine people’s behaviour to try to find associations with different health outcomes.

Observational research can show associations between two things, such as drinking and mortality. But proving that one affects the other is not easy.