india

Updated: Mar 06, 2020 14:59 IST

Highlights SC to hear petitions that sought FIR for hate speeches

Petitioners had accused BJP leaders of hate speeches

Delhi High Court had put off hearing in this case to April

The Supreme Court will on Wednesday hear a petition which seeks immediate registration of FIRs against political leaders for inflammatory speeches and slogans. The petition filed by 10 victims of the violence was mentioned for urgent listing before a bench headed by Chief Justice Sharad Arvind Bobde which said it would be heard on Wednesday.

“We read newspapers blaming us. There is so much pressure on us…. But we cannot prevent such things. We don’t want people to die… We want peace. But the court has never been able to curb such violence,” the CJI had said when senior advocate Colin Gonsalves, appearing for petitioners, sought urgent listing of the plea on Monday.

Gonsalves had underlined that the FIRs should be registered immediately since nearly 10 people were dying every day.

“Last night 6 or 7 people died,” he told the bench. “The urgency is that 5 or 6 personalities are going around encouraging it,” Gonsalves had said.

Facts Damage due to Delhi riots - 745

Households - 112

Shops - 322

Vehicles - 301

The petitioners have named BJP leaders Anurag Thakur, Parvesh Verma, Kapil Mishra and Abhay Verma and other leaders for their purported inflammatory speeches.

A bench of the Delhi High Court led by Chief Justice DN Patel and justice C Hari Shankar had last week given the police four weeks to respond to petitioned that hate speeches by some political leaders had incited the protesters, leading to the riots in the national capital. Forty-six people died in the riots and over 300 were injured.

“We will hear it. But you must understand we are not equipped to prevent such things from happening,” Chief Justice of India SA Bobde

The Supreme Court agreed to hear the request at an early date but underlined that courts could not prevent such riots.

“We will hear it. But you must understand we are not equipped to prevent such things from happening. We can only come into the scene after such riots have happened… Court can never prevent such things,” CJI Bobde had said.

On Harsh Mander’s petition in the high court, a bench of justices S Muralidhar and Talwant Singh had initially come down hard on the police asking them to review all the video tapes of hate speeches and report back to the court within 24 hours with its decision on registration of cases.

Orders to transfer Justice S Muralidhar were issued before this 24-hour deadline ended.

The next day, a bench led by Chief Justice Patel of the high court gave the police four weeks after Solicitor General (SG) Tushar Mehta repeated that the atmosphere was “not conducive” to file cases at the moment. Mehta had taken a similar stand when the case was heard by Justice Muralidhar’s bench but it had criticised the police for inaction, asked them to do a review, take a decision, and reply the next day.