With Attorney General Jeff Sessions’s decision Thursday to recuse himself from any investigations into Russia’s connections to Donald Trump's presidential campaign, focus is turning to the Department of Justice’s secondary leaders.

The Hill will be providing updates from the Senate Judiciary hearing here.

They are likely to face sharp questions about how they might handle investigations into Russia’s interference in the 2016 election or ties to the Trump campaign, as well as the president's unsubstantiated accusation that former President Obama wiretapped Trump Tower during the campaign.

Deputy attorney general nominee Rod Rosenstein and associate attorney general nominee Rachel Brand will face the national spotlight Tuesday during their confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Calls for Sessions to return sparks spat

12:25 p.m.

Several Democrats took the opportunity to hammer Sessions for his corrected testimony on whether he had any contact with Russian officials during the campaign — earning a hurry-along from the chair in the process.

"I think Senator Sessions should come back. I think he owes it to this committee to come back and explain himself," Franken said in an extended summary of Sessions's confirmation testimony and subsequent correction. "He answered a question I did not ask. I bent over backward not to say that he lied. He needs to come back."

"If you’re making a statement, please make it very quickly," Grassley cut in.

Later, Grassley pushed back more strongly, touching off a brief brushfire between the two lawmakers.

"I would like to comment on what Sen. Franken just said," Grassley said, characterizing Franken's initial question to Sessions regarding Russian contacts, during his confirmation hearing, as a "gotcha" question.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It was not a gotcha question, sir,” Franken said.

“It was from the standpoint that he didn't know what you were asking about,” a visibly angry Grassley said, gaveling for order repeatedly as Franken attempted to respond to him.

“Look at the tape, Mr. Chair —” Franken said.

“Senator Tillis — Senator Tillis —” Grassley pressed, insisting the hearing move on.

"I know what I read in the newspaper"

12:09 p.m.

Pressed repeatedly by Democrats for a series of confirmations — including how he interpreted the scope of Sessions's recusal, whether he would publicly announce the close of a probe into Russian involvement in the election, whether he believed a special counsel was needed, whether he knew about the existence of an ongoing investigation — Rosenstein walked a careful tightrope.

Repeatedly, he declined to speculate, insisting that it would be inappropriate for him to offer a firm opinion when the extent of his knowledge is "what I read in the newspaper" — a position that at times appeared to frustrate Democrats.

Throughout the back-and-forth, Brand sat quietly. She was occasionally asked brief questions unrelated to Russia — but her answers were largely lost in the tense exchanges with Rosenstein.

Shows where their focus is today. https://t.co/cp7ig35Vrj — Katie Bo Williams (@KatieBoWill) March 7, 2017

"I'm going to ask Ms. Brand a question. Mr. Rosenstein, feel free to space out on this one," Sen. Al Franken Alan (Al) Stuart FrankenPeterson faces fight of his career in deep-red Minnesota district Getting tight — the psychology of cancel culture Tina Smith wins Democratic Senate primary in Minnesota MORE (D-Minn.) joked at one point.

Rosenstein declines to endorse — or condemn — a special prosecutor

11:04 a.m.

Sen Cornyn says he saw at CIA four large binders of information given to his colleagues for a bipartisan probe about Russian interference. — Sari Horwitz (@SariHorwitz) March 7, 2017

In an occasionally tense exchange with Feinstein, Rosenstein declined to weigh in on the need for a special counsel, arguing that he doesn't know the underlying facts as the current acting deputy attorney general does and therefore cannot make a determination on whether such a role is needed.

Feinstein was unsatisfied, arguing that she interpreted his answer as a "no."

Rosenstein pushed back gently.

"I'm simply not in a position to answer that," he said.

Later, pressed on the same subject by Sen. Patrick Leahy Patrick Joseph LeahyBattle over timing complicates Democratic shutdown strategy Hillicon Valley: Russia 'amplifying' concerns around mail-in voting to undermine election | Facebook and Twitter take steps to limit Trump remarks on voting | Facebook to block political ads ahead of election Top Democrats press Trump to sanction Russian individuals over 2020 election interference efforts MORE (D-Vt.), he affirmed: "I will appoint a special counsel whenever I determine it’s appropriate based on the policies and procedures of the Department of Justice."

Rosenstein sees no reason for his own recusal

10:52 a.m.

WASHINGTON (AP) — Nominee for deputy attorney general says he's not aware of any requirement for him to recuse himself from Russia matter. — Eric Tucker (@etuckerAP) March 7, 2017

Pressed by Grassley on any conversations he has had with Sessions about investigations into Russian interference, Rosenstein said not only did he not recall any conversation on that topic, he expected to treat any such investigation no differently than any other.

Roseinstein affirmed that he was "not aware of any" reason why he would need to recuse himself from such an investigation.

ADVERTISEMENT

"The bottom line is that it’s my job to make sure all investigations are conducted independently."