The arrest of yet another “transgender” sex-offender—this time in a women’s bathroom in Calhoun, Georgia—has highlighted the ongoing insanity of allowing these mentally ill people to use facilities not meant for their biologically-determined sex.

The “transgender” offender was charged with public indecency, disorderly conduct, and criminal trespass after entering and then taking his clothes off in front of children in the women’s restroom of Walmart in Calhoun.

Identified as Norwood Smith Burnes, 51, of 2 Leland Ave., Rome, the “transgender” was “found in stages of undress while on the stone floor and would do this in the presence of several young children.”

Police officers arrived to find Burnes wearing a dark woman’s suit including a short skirt and jacket, black leather coat, black high heels, red nail polish, green eye shadow, and women’s jewelry.

According to the witness, Burnes had been in the women’s section of the store with his skirt “kicked up showing his white girdle and dark thong underwear.”

The witness also said that when Burnes entered the women’s bathroom, he ordered other women out as they entered. He was arrested at 7:30 Sunday morning.

Notes on the police report indicate that Burnes “has a long criminal history of indecent exposure and is currently on probation for public indecency.”

Although normal people would not even consider allowing obviously mentally-ill people like “transgenders” to use opposite sex bathrooms, the insanity of ignoring biological reality has spread as far as the federal court system.

According to a report in Fox News, a federal appeals court in Virginia found that a high school in the state “discriminated” against a “transgender” student—identified as “G.G.”—when it forced the teen girl to use the girl’s bathroom.

The court ruled that “transgender” students should be covered under Title IX protections against “sex discrimination.”

In effect, this means that public schools no longer have the right to provide separate bathrooms based on sex.

The court decision showed just how far the “transgender” insanity has become the norm. It says that the “transgender” teen’s “birth-assigned sex, or so-called ‘biological sex,’ is female, but G.G.’s gender identity is male.”

Note the use of the phrase “so-called biological sex.” The use of the phrase “so-called” by a federal judge means that the very concept of biology is being called into question.

As Matt Walsh, a columnist for the Blaze wrote in his summary of the case:

This is a legal opinion written by a judge on a federal court and it treats with suspicion and contempt the very notion that biological sex exists. According to the legal analysis of these judges, the girl’s “gender identity” – her feelings about her gender – are far more real, demonstrable, and scientific than her chromosomes, anatomy, and DNA. Like I said, psychotic. They might as well have written an opinion stating that the moon is made of Pop Rocks and every citizen has a right to fly there on a unicorn with Santa Claus and Big Foot. But even that would make more sense because at least the moon is real. “Gender identity,” on the other hand, is not. The culture is going down the toilet in a hurry, so it probably behooves any man to determine how he might respond should he be in a position where he witnesses an obvious man trying to enter the facilities after his wife or daughter.

One Washington woman, Kristi Merritt, proved the point with a witty dress-up posting on Facebook.

A copy of her images and captions follow below, without the need for further elucidation.