David said: Dash is decentralized; there is no "boss" who gives permission for people to do things. Community members are free to do what they want; they are not subject to any central authority. That's the entire point of crypto!



There is nobody who can give permission to do anything, nor is there anyone who can forbid people from doing anything. How could a person be forbidden from doing something? They can't be fired, nor can they have their Dash taken away from them! Click to expand...

I agree with you fully that there is no some kind of centralized authority of "boss" like you pointed out.Would make me laugh if some community member took effort and start by itself promoting Liberlands "national currency" or whatever, but this was put in agenda of Dash Core Team Monthly Report.Correct me if I am wrong but community (me as well) should support actions what core team is doing, express opinion, like I stated earlier.My question is totally correct since I was surprised that funny story got attraction by the core team, so this is what I wanted to see, If they support this idea or it was just a hint from someone in the fly.Authorized can be also possible in decentralized way and I think this is exactly where DASH is going further, it would be one of leading argument of DASH being superb among other crypto.I respect your posts on BTCtalk and please dont get me wrong, but if we are promoting our experiment as a "decentralized virtual company" - brand, authorization is going to be determined anyhow. It is natural.If you like more it can be meaning, authorized by the community, or by MNs whatever...