We're mad as hell and we're not going to take it anymore. That's right, all of us are now Howard Beale, the out-of-control newscaster from the 1976 classic movie "Network." Both Republicans and Democrats in New Hampshire confirmed the mood of the country: anger, disgust, frustration. Fed up with Washington gridlock, with leaders continually kicking tough problems down the road, voters have made political neophyte Donald Trump and Vermont firebrand Bernie Sanders the new presidential front-runners. Can "traditional" candidates like Hillary Clinton, Jeb Bush and John Kasich respond? We will see. Below you will find hour-by-hour reports and analysis from Tuesday's "first in the nation" primary.

>> Analysis: New Hampshire primary winners and losers

Update (7:11 p.m. PT): Trump is king

"Oh, wow. Wow, wow, wow," said Donald Trump as he took the podium at his campaign headquarters in New Hampshire. "So beautiful."

Since getting in the race last spring, the real-estate mogul has insulted his opponents in the Republican presidential field and offended immigrants, women and many others. The Huffington Post news site called him a racist and banished coverage of him to its entertainment section. But Trump rode right-leaning outrage to victory in the "first in the nation" primary on Tuesday, confirming his front-runner status a week after finishing in second place in the Iowa Caucus. He won about 34 percent of the Republican vote in the Granite State, doubling the results of second-place finisher John Kasich.

In his victory speech, with chants of "USA! USA! USA!" filling the room, Trump declared that he would "make America great again" by cutting "great trade deals," rebuilding the military and securing the borders. "We're going to beat all of these countries that are taking so much from us," he said, singling out China, Japan and Mexico.

"The world is going to respect us again," he said. "Believe me."

Update (6:56 p.m. PT): Kasich is the comeback kid

John Kasich will finish second in the New Hampshire Republican primary. The Ohio governor, who languished in single digits in the polls for months, now becomes the leading alternative to "outsider" candidates Donald Trump and Texas Sen. Ted Cruz.

Kasich believes his quieter, policy wonkish approach ultimately will work when voters weigh him against the bombastic Trump and aggressive Cruz. He insisted earlier that he "would not take the low road to the highest office in the land."

Update (6:45 p.m. PT): Sanders revels in victory

Bernie Sanders, with his hair askew as always and his black-framed eyeglasses glinting in the lights, was received like a rock star by his supporters tonight at the Sanders campaign headquarters in New Hampshire.

The man who has demanded free college education, single-payer universal health insurance and increased Social Security benefits declared that it's "too late for the same old establishment economics. People want real change."

He called, once again, for a political revolution in the country. "I hear this not just from progressives, but also from conservatives and moderates," he said. "We can no longer have a campaign-finance system where billionaires buy elections. That is not what democracy is about. That is what oligarchy is about."

The Vermont senator boasted that he does not have or want a Super PAC (political action committee) and that the average contribution to his campaign is just $27.

Sanders now casts his eyes on the Nevada Caucus on Feb. 23. His insurgent, New World Order campaign has knocked former secretary of state Hillary Clinton, once considered a shoo-in for the Democratic nomination, back on her heels. Clinton remains the favorite as the schedule turns toward Super Tuesday on March 1, but Sanders has made clear that he plans to fight her and politics as usual every step of the way.

Update (6:32 p.m. PT): Clinton declares she still loves N.H.

Hillary Clinton gave a thumping concession speech, telling her supporters: "I know I have some work to do, particularly with young people," and vowing to do it.

"I still love New Hampshire and I always will," she said. "Now we take this campaign to the entire country."

Clinton lost the "first in the nation" primary by a wide margin to Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders. In her speech, she listed the many issues on which she and Sanders are generally in agreement, from ending the student debt crisis to addressing income inequality. Noting a widespread feeling among Americans that society's haves are gaming the system and holding down the have-nots, she emphasized a commitment to attack Wall Street corruption. "And you know what? I know how to do it," she declared, saying (without specifically saying) that she is a proven doer while Sanders is a lifelong tilter at windmills.

She ended by lauding police officers, firefighters, nurses and others who do "the quiet work, the heroic work for the rest of us," and saying she would fight for "human rights across the board for every single American."

Update (5:30 p.m. PT): Clinton tries to change the subject

Hillary Clinton expected to take a loss in New Hampshire and she has. She also knows she could lose Feb. 23rd's Nevada Caucus. Which is why her campaign put out a press statement tonight insisting it's March that truly matters.

"It's important to understand why the campaign is investing so much time, energy and resources in states with primaries and caucuses in March," the statement reads. "The reason is simple: while important, the first four states represent just 4% of the delegates needed to secure the nomination; the 28 states that vote (or caucus) in March will award 56% of the delegates needed to win."

So-called "Super Tuesday" on March 1 includes primaries or caucuses in Alabama, Arkansas, Colorado, Georgia, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Oklahoma, Tennessee and Texas.

Update (5:02 p.m. PT): Trump, Sanders win

The polls have officially closed in New Hampshire. CNN, MSNBC, Fox News and other news outlets have projected Donald Trump the Republican winner and Bernie Sanders the Democratic winner. John Kasich and Jeb Bush appear to be fighting for second place among Republicans.

Update (4:45 p.m. PT): Candidates look at early vote numbers

Exit polling and candidates' internal numbers suggest Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders are winning big and that a lot of independents are going for John Kasich. Meanwhile, people are still voting. Offers CNN:

"Deputy Secretary of State David Scanlan says turnout could set a new record and discussions are underway about whether to extend voting hours in Merrimack, New Hampshire, where there is a long line of cars backed up leading to the polling place."

Update (4:25 p.m. PT): Get in line!

The polls across most of New Hampshire are supposed to be closed but aren't. Why? Long, long lines. Donald Trump supporters are feeling confident. Watch a CNN time-lapse video of a "massive" queue at Trump headquarters in the state:

Time lapse of massive line waiting to get inside Trump election HQ pic.twitter.com/0zBw9fIrBX — Jim Acosta (@Acosta) February 9, 2016

Update (4:17 p.m. PT): A big night for John Kasich?

Ohio Gov. John Kasich is looking for a surprise second-place finish in New Hampshire that he believes would position him as the real "grown-up" alternative (rather than Florida Sen. Marco Rubio) to fire-breathing insurgents Donald Trump and Ted Cruz.

"It's a shame when you see people take the low road to the highest office in the land," he said. "I've decided not to do it. We feel the momentum. And we'll see what happens, and we'll live with the results. But there will be no regrets in the Kasich campaign for all the work we've put in, the positivity of all of it."

Update (4:05 p.m. PT): Fox News accidentally declares winner

Earlier today Fox News declared on its website that all the votes were in and Donald Trump was the Republican winner with 28 percent of the vote. Fox quickly pulled back that winner's call, saying it was accidental. Most of New Hampshire's polls, after all, are still open.

"During routine testing in preparation for the New Hampshire primary a malfunction occurred which briefly showed errant data on our website," Fox News said. "This error has been rectified. We apologize for any confusion this may have caused."

Update (3:50 p.m. PT): Exit polls track key issues

Exit polls indicate the top issues for New Hampshire Republicans are government spending and terrorism. 50 percent of Granite State GOP voters feel "betrayed" by their own party.

Income inequality ("fairness") and the economy/jobs are the top issues for Democrats. 41 percent of Democrats said President Barack Obama's agenda should be continued, while 40 percent said the next president should be "more liberal" than Obama.

Update (3:42 p.m. PT): Warren's difficult choice

Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, scourge of Wall Street and progressive heroine, is holding back on endorsing a presidential candidate for a very good reason, the Associated Press reports. Her passions align with Sanders, but if the front-running Clinton becomes president, Warren will need to be in her good graces to successfully push her agenda. "Warren and Clinton have had their disagreements, but each advocates a robust government that tackles social and economic problems," AP writes. "Yet endorsing Clinton while Sanders remains a viable candidate could disillusion Warren's exuberant young and liberal supporters, many of whom now are embracing Sanders."

The Associated Press adds: "Privately, many Democrats said they wonder whether Warren regrets not running herself when she sees how competitive Sanders, her ideological doppelganger, has been."

Update (3:25 p.m. PT): Where's Ted?

Pundits and reporters haven't been talking much about Ted Cruz today, even though the Texas senator won the Iowa Republican caucuses last week. Donald Trump is expected to win and Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush and John Kasich are believed to be fighting for second place in New Hampshire. The Economist explains that Cruz's problem is that he is essentially a religious candidate. "His game plan may itself betray a form of cognitive dissonance," the British magazine writes, "because, beyond Iowa and parts of the South, those elusive evangelical legions may not exist." The publication says this with a sigh of relief, adding: "the violence of his language might interest a psychoanalyst."

Update (3:05 p.m. PT): Exit polls for Sanders, 'stock market' for Clinton

Donald Trump is overwhelmingly getting the votes of first-time GOP primary voters in New Hampshire, according to exit polls. But ... the percentage of voters who are participating for the first time -- 12 -- is the same as in 2012.

Exit polls also suggest that Bernie Sanders is doing very well in the Granite State, as expected. This could provide valuable momentum for the underdog. He's believed to be running strong in Nevada, which holds caucuses Feb. 23.

That said, Hillary Clinton continues to look very good in the South, where many states vote shortly after Nevada.

PredictIt says Clinton leads Sanders 80 to 14 in Tennessee, for example. She also tops 80 in Texas, Oklahoma, Alabama, Arkansas and Georgia. Sanders leads in soon-to-come states outside the South, including a 98-2 lead in his home state of Vermont.

To be sure, those are not percentages but cents on the dollar. Huh? PredictIt does not offer preference polling. The University of Wellington crowd-sourcing project describes itself as a "real-money political prediction market, the stock market for politics."

Update (2:35 p.m. PT): Donald Trump's beautiful wall

Donald Trump told MSNBC this morning that the wall he wants to build along the southern border with Mexico will cost $8 billion. He came up with that number through "a very simple calculation," he said.

"We need 1,000 [miles] because we have natural barriers [along the 2,000-mile border] and I'm taking it price-per-square-foot and a price-per-square-mile," he said, pointing out that his experience as a real-estate developer has made him very good at nailing down such cost estimates.

He said the wall will be 35-40 feet high and will have a "beautiful door" for immigrants who go through the process to gain legal entry to the U.S. He continues to insist the Mexican government will pay for the wall, suggesting he would use trade sanctions and the withdrawal of aid to get them to pony up.

Update (1:25 p.m. PT): Ivanka on the ground, Hillary on YouTube

Much has been made about Hillary Clinton giving paid speeches to Wall Street, with critics suggesting she is in the financial sector's pocket. (Clinton has said this is part of the Sanders campaign's "artistic smear" of her reputation.) Sanders has highlighted the fact that Clinton, then in the U.S. Senate, changed her vote on a bankruptcy bill back in 2001.

Clinton's response: she did indeed initially oppose the bill, at the time telling progressive heroine Elizabeth Warren, then a little-known Harvard professor, "Professor Warren, we've got to stop that awful bill." And then later she did indeed vote for it, because her support came with strings attached. She says her backing brought about the removal of a hated provision about child support "she said would hurt women and children."

"That's the way it happens (in the Senate) sometimes," she told CNN's Jake Tapper. "I didn't like the bill any more than I had liked it before. It still had very bad provisions. But I also pushed hard for a deal to protect women and children. So, okay. I held my nose, I voted for it. It never became law."

It's this kind of approach to politics -- Washington insiders call it pragmatic and intelligent; Washington outsiders call it selling out -- that makes progressive activists suspicious of Clinton, and Sanders has taken advantage of that suspicion.

A Sanders spokeswoman recently called for Clinton to release transcripts of her speeches to banking groups. Well ... at least one has surfaced on YouTube: Clinton giving a 2014 Goldman Sachs-hosted speech. It is undeniably innocuous, with Clinton's theme being women's critical role in the economy. "If we are talking about global economic growth ... there is no path forward that does not include women," she says in the speech.

Is it representative of all her speeches to big banks? Politico is reporting on a Goldman Sachs speech from a year earlier that was apparently much different. "It was pretty glowing about us," said an unnamed source who apparently works for Goldman Sachs. "It's so far from what she sounds like as a candidate now. It was like a rah-rah speech. She sounded more like a Goldman Sachs managing director."

Below watch video of the 2014 speech:

Donald Trump is expected to win the New Hampshire primary, and from there the sky might be the limit. Forty-two percent of registered Republicans now say the political novice will go on and win the nomination.

If he does become the GOP standard bearer, can he win the votes of women that Clinton is having such a hard time with right now? The Washington Post doubts it. The paper has cataloged the insults he's lobbed at women reporters during the campaign. They include: "bimbo"; "liberal clown"; "dopey"; "dummy"; a "disaster"; "one of the truly bad reporters"; "third-rate reporter"; "two of the dumbest people in politics"; "poor and purposely inaccurate reporting"; "one of the dumber bloggers"; "kooky"; "so average in every way"; "dishonest!"; "absolutely terrible."

Trump has essentially argued that he slams everyone who's not fair to him and the fact that he doesn't treat women reporters better than male journalists shows he's all for equality.

There might be something to that -- or, at the least, there might be something to his ability to spin it that way. "After closely watching the GOP presidential debates, it's not hard to see that Donald Trump has been far more shrewd than his opponents have been giving him credit for," a commenter said on the Web community Quora, expressing an increasingly common opinion.

That might be why his daughter, 34-year-old businesswoman and former model Ivanka Trump, is making the rounds of New Hampshire voting sites today, talking up her father and posing for selfies. (Watch video below.) She's not just photogenic, she's poised, articulate and likable. She humanizes Trump, helping dispel the idea of him as the "American Mussolini" and thus making him more palatable to voters who are heading into the voting booth still undecided. (One estimate is that 30 percent of the GOP electorate in New Hampshire will make up their mind or change their preference today).

"I've seen him in the capacity obviously as a father, and a very loving one, and also as an incredible executive who built an amazing company," Ivanka said on the radio this week. "And he really is remarkable."

Morning report:

Dixville Notch loves its political ritual. Every four years, the tiny New Hampshire pseudo-town sends its registered voters to the polls just after midnight on primary day so that it can get a moment in the national spotlight. And it works every time.

Dixville Notch Republicans gave Ohio Gov. John Kasich, a decided underdog, the early lead in the New Hampshire primary. He beat businessman Donald Trump three votes to two. (Trump is the clear front-runner in both the New Hampshire and national polls.) All four of the hamlet's Democrats, meanwhile, voted for Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders.

Millsfield is another mini-town that's allowed to vote and close its polls early for publicity's sake. Texas Sen. Ted Cruz grabbed nine votes in Millsfield to Trump's three. Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton bested Sanders among Democrats, two votes to one.

The little towns can't be counted on as bellwethers for the state, but -- like a broken clock twice a day -- they do catch the zeitgeist sometimes. Back in the 1960 general election, for example, Dixville Notch gave nine votes to Richard Nixon and none to John F. Kennedy, and Nixon did carry New Hampshire with 53 percent of the vote. (Kennedy, of course, won the presidency in a famous squeaker.) Polls in New Hampshire close in most of the state at 7 p.m. Eastern.

Themes playing out today:

* Marco Rubio really might be a robot -- or, rubot, as he's been dubbed. At his last rally before New Hampshire voters headed to the polls, he showed that his tendency to repeat scripted lines -- sometimes the same ones over and over in a single short speech -- isn't reserved for TV debates. At Nashua Community College on Monday he said he and his wife found it difficult "to instill our values in our kids instead of the values they try to ram down our throats." Then he said it two more times before stepping down from the podium, seemingly unaware that he was repeating himself.

This criticism isn't especially fair. Every political candidate repeats the same lines over and over. But at Saturday's GOP debate, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie pointed out -- repeatedly -- that the junior senator from Florida does seem to have trouble talking off the cuff, and now people are noticing it. The Independent's Marco Rubio headline today: "Marco Rubio repeated himself again. Marco Rubio repeated himself again. Marco Rubio repeated." The YouTube video that proved it (watch below) is titled, "Marco Rubio Short-Circuits Again, Inexplicably Repeats Scripted Line World for Word."

All of which probably won't bother him much if he can repeat his Iowa vote percentage -- 23 percent -- in New Hampshire.

* Hillary Clinton is progressive. No, really. Sanders, seeking to clearly differentiate himself from Clinton, tweeted out last week, "You can be a moderate. You can be a progressive. But you cannot be a moderate and a progressive." This claim has received a fair amount of pushback. Vox succinctly explained why Sanders is, for the most part, wrong. "'Progressive' is an ideological term. It refers to a position on an ideological spectrum, namely to the left. A progressive's opposite is a conservative. 'Moderate' is a practical term. It belongs to the second category of assessment. Broadly speaking, it refers to a candidate who focuses on consensus building and incremental progress, someone who doesn't believe the US political system is capable of sudden, lurching change, or just doesn't want that kind of change. A moderate's opposite is a radical, someone who believes rapid, revolutionary change is both possible and necessary." Clinton, meanwhile, has been trying to shore up her progressive credentials all week. "I won't cut Social Security," she tweeted last Friday. "As always, I'll defend it, & I'll expand it. Enough false innuendos."

The perception that Clinton's progressivism is shaky, she and her closest advisers apparently believe, might be the campaign pros she's surrounded herself with. Politico reported Monday that heads are going to roll in the Clinton campaign after the New Hampshire primary. Clinton, for her part, said "we're going to take stock" after the vote, while adding that she supported her team.

2008 Obama campaign chieftain David Axelrod, apparently a sore winner, doesn't buy into the idea that the problem is the message rather than the messenger. Here's a tweet he sent out Monday:

* Clinton's still not as progressive as Bernie Sanders. A number of economists have said Sanders' ambitious (indeed, revolutionary) economic program -- free public college, Medicare for all, massive infrastructure spending, increased Social Security benefits, etc. -- would blow a big hole in the federal budget. But University of Massachusetts-Amherst economics professor Gerald Friedman says Sanders' plan would actually be a boon to the economy, leading to 26 million new jobs and raising average family income by about $22,000 per year. Friedman compared Sanders' program to Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal and said it would spur the economy more than the plans of any of the Republican presidential candidates, ultimately taking care of the budget deficit. Oh, and Sanders is the only presidential candidate, from either party, who pays campaign interns. His interns receive $10.10 per hour.

For more about the primary, including the final New Hampshire poll numbers and a scientific explanation for why many people find Republican candidate Ted Cruz so creepy, check out this story.

-- Douglas Perry