Update 3 October 2015 John Helmer, dean of the foreign press corps accredited in Russia, provides further evidence to my thesis [See Sputnik News interviews Swedish Doctors for Human Rights Chairman, on UN Security Council draft resolution ref. MH17 “The Australian Government is sure the Dutch Safety Board (DSB) investigation of the downing of Malaysian Airlines MH17 will fail to identify the precise cause of the crash, and will be inconclusive on who and what were responsible. A report, termed final by the DSB, is scheduled for release on October 13. So certain of the outcome are Australian officials that since May they have been negotiating with the Dutch Government to extend for another year until August 2016 a treaty agreement for Australian police, intelligence agents and Defence Ministry officers to operate in The Netherlands. Without Australian bodies left to identify or repatriate, and only the debris of the MH17 aircraft in partial reconstruction in a hangar at the Hilversum Army Barracks, Dutch and Malaysian sources are questioning what purpose is served by the treaty extension.” / JohnHelmer. Read the full report at: MH17 – WHY THE INVESTIGATION WILL NEVER END, THE EVIDENCE NEVER SEEN

Update 1 August 2015

If you think you have heard all about the alternative causes in the MH17 tragedy, you may read this report – it strongly suggests that a bomb exploded inside the aircraft causing it to crash. It is found here: Does voice recording suggest MH17 brought down by bomb on board?

@Professorsblogg note: A most interesting issue in this regards, is that Ambassador Samantha Power, U.S. Permanent Representative to the United Nations, declared at a Security Council Briefing on Ukraine (September 19, 2014), “Based on those preliminary findings, one can rule out that Flight MH 17 was brought down by a bomb on board. It was not.”

But prior to that who had mentioned that a bomb was the cause of the MH17 downing? To the best of my knowledge, no such a hypothesis had been put forward by then.

Update 30 July 2015

Full transcription of the interview by Sputnik News to Swedish Doctors for Human Rights Chairman on UNSC draft resolution, MH17.

[Click on image below for the article]

Update 30 July 2015

Swedish Doctors for Human Rights, on the facts VS. libelous allegations on the MH17 catastrophe.

[Click on image below for the article]

Update 29 July 2015

Prize-winner cultural icon investigates the feasibility of the ‘False-Flag Hypothesis’ in the MH17 crash.

[Click on image below for the article]

Update 22 July 2015

U.S. experts say that the refusal of Ukraine government to release the results of the official investigation about the MH17 crash may indicate it was shot-down by an Ukrainian jet-fighter.

Click on image below to view the full article

Update 8 February 2015



New analysis indicates that “data on Flight Tracking web sites was changed from four days after the plane went down”, and hypothesizes that adulteration in the Historic route data was devised to cover the fact that MH-17 was “deliberately re-routed onto the battlefield.” The analysis was taken from the site Be circumspect, published here

Excepts from the article’s Summary:

“Prior to its tragic downing on July 17, flight MH17 had avoided the battlefield, flying around it at least back to the 6th (last day I downloaded data from the FlightAware web site). The above screenshots * prove that FlightAware.com historic route data has now been changed to make MH17’s route down the middle of a hot battlefield appear to be the “regular route”. In fact it was not. MH17 had avoided the battle zone everyday until it was redirected into the kill zone, shadowed by a fighter, and shot down using multiple air to air missiles.

The fact that the old flight routes are being changed on web sites, speaks volumes about the degree of the cover up. You see if MH17 was re-directed, set up to be shot down, then it clearly was not an accident. As of writing, neither Poland, nor the Ukraine have released air traffic control tapes. No doubt because they once again would point to MH17 being set up.”

* Screenshots seen in the full-article

Update 25 December 2014

Video – Interview with witness testifying it was Ukraine’s Air force who downed MH17. Full transcript in English:

Update 20 December 2014

Ukrainian Soldier Confirms: Ukraine’s Military Shot Down Malaysian MH17 Plane.

Click on image below for this report by Eric Zuesse

Update 23 Nov 2014

SCANDALOUS: SECRECY AGREEMENTS allow Ukraine to put a lock on any incrimination evidence on MH17 downing.

Click on image below to read the full report by Jan Fluitketel, a Dutch citizen who lives in Malaysia:

Update 14 Nov 2014

Revealing new radar data: other jets in same course as Malaysia Airlines MH17

[Click on image below for article]

Update 12 Nov 2014

Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17. Artist: Amely Rose



Updates 6 Nov 2014

West media silence on MH17-downing analyses pointing Ukraine’s responsibility:

Click on image below

Update 5 Nov 2014

Click on screenshot below for the statements of Lt. General Pushkarev (Ret.), who maintains that the MH17 was downed by Ukraine forces.

.

Update 22 Sept 2014

Why the Malaysian MH17 plane was diverted to fly over the very war-scenario in East Ukraine – and then got shot down? This report published on the aftermath of the crash shed light on the issue of different routes assigned at different occasions to the same flight: “ Questions over why Malaysian plane flew over Ukrainian warzone “.

Update 21 Sept 2014

German families of victims in the shot-downed Malaysian Airlines MH17 to sue Ukraine AND Poroshenko over instructions on flying-route.

Click on images below for full ABC News article, and the report in Malaymailonline, respectively. Further, a video reporting that the MH17 was lead to a new route, different to that one used in ten flights before.

Update 18 Sept 2014

Report from the Russian Engineers Association confirm Malaysian Airlines MH17 was shot down by Ukraine fighter-jet.

Russian experts’ analysis shows that Dutch MH17-report was rigged. Links to the report in English here. For the report in original Rusian, go here. Links provided by The Oceania Saker. Here a news video on the Russian report, with English texts:

Update 10 Sept 2014

See NYT article in this link

This was said by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts on deceiving Western media reports on Ukraine:

Update 9 Sept 2014

Comment by The Professors’ Blog on “Summary of Findings” published in the Preliminary Report [Comment and Link to the full report in Pdf., at section XI at the bottom of this page]. For instance:

The Report says: “The damage observed in the forward section of the aircraft appears to indicate that the aircraft was penetrated by a large number of high-energy objects from outside the aircraft. It is likely that this damage resulted in a loss of structural integrity of the aircraft, leading to an in-flight break up.” The Report says: “The damage observed in the forward section of the aircraft appears to indicate that the aircraft was penetrated by a large number of high-energy objects from outside the aircraft. THAT, the last formulation in the transcript above, is the plausible explanation of the fragmentation of the aircraft (causing the rests were found scattered on the ground), and NOT that the “destruction of the aircraft already in the air” would have been “obviously” the result of a surface-to-air missile impact. I have to note that “Western” media have not reproduced that last sentence in the news reports. An illustration here below:



DW: “Damage observed on the forward fuselage and cockpit section of the aircraft appears to indicate that there were impacts from a large number of high-energy objects from outside the aircraft.” Period.



DW, 9 Sept 2014, Dutch preliminary report finds MH17 ‘pierced by high-speed objects’

Click to enlarge

Media sources of graphic above:

BBC, “MH17 crash: Dutch experts say numerous objects hit plane“; CBC News, “Video | Malaysia Airlines MH17: Michael Bociurkiw talks about being first at the crash site” ; Gobal Research, Calif. “The Downing of Malaysia Flight 17: Sinister Pretext for War with Russia“; Photo: NBAAI

”Reader-comments to my July 31st article, First Examination of Malaysian MH-17 Cockpit Photo Shows Ukraine Government Shot that Plane Down, have provided links and leads to independent additional confirmatory evidence, to such an extent that I now feel confident enough to say that the evidence on this matter is, indeed, ’conclusive’.” / Eric Zuesse, in: “Evidence Is Now Conclusive: 2 Ukrainian Government SU-25 Fighter-Jets Did Shoot Down that Malaysian Airliner. No ‘Buk’ Missile Ground-Shot Was Involved.“ Washingtonblog.com, 2 August 2014.

Update 22 August 2014:

Interviewed by the Swedish TV, Foreign Minister Carl Bildt stated in absolute terms, “Of course Russian separatists were behind the shooting down of the Malaysian MH17″. “Of course” Bildt did not provide any evidence for his xenophobic statement. A new posted comment on author Johan Croneman’s analysis in DN of 17 August, published at Bildt: “Of course Russian separatists downed Malaysian MH-17″. No Swedish media asked him for his evidence.



Update 7 August 2014:

Breaking: A Malaysia main paper reports on US-experts’ findings which indicate the MH17 was downed by an air-to-air missile attack, finished by cannon fire. Malaysia asking, Did Ukraine Military Do It? Click on link for the full article “ US analysts conclude MH17 downed by aircraft“.

A followed story based in the cited experts findings, in link below:

MH17 Brought Down by Air-to-Air Missile, Finished Off by 30-mm Cannon, Experts Allege

Please read these links successively, as they provide enhanced evidence built on analyses of previous and new emerging findings.



UPDATED LINKS 7 August 2014 (See Part IV):

1) John Kerry Says the Rebels Downed MH17 In Ukraine. How Can He Know? Questions For John Kerry. By Ian Shilling (Ian56789).

2) The evidence is building that the Kiev military shot down Malaysian Airlines Flight MH17 in Ukraine (17 July 2017). By Ian Shilling (Ian56789).

I

http://www.anderweltonline.com/wissenschaft-und-technik/luftfahrt-2014/shocking-analysis-of-the-shooting-down-of-malaysian-mh17/

II

Professorsblogg translation of SU-25 tech. performance referred in the German article cited by P. Heisenko above:

III

http://www.opednews.com/articles/First-Examination-of-Malay-by-Eric-Zuesse-Activism-Anti-War_Obama-Administration_Peace_War_President-Barack-Obama-POTUS-140731-170.html

IV

Video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MMFfBsxug0U

V

http://www.opednews.com/articles/First-Examination-of-Malay-by-Eric-Zuesse-Activism-Anti-War_Obama-Administration_Peace_War_President-Barack-Obama-POTUS-140731-170.html

VI

http://www.globalresearch.ca/evidence-is-now-conclusive-two-ukrainian-government-fighter-jets-shot-down-malaysian-airlines-mh17-it-was-not-a-buk-surface-to-air-missile/5394814

VII

Article by Prof. Anders Romesjö: Who shot down the Malaysian Airline MH17? [Swedish]

http://jinge.se/allmant/vem-skot-ned-malaysian-airline-mh17.htm

VIII

http://whowhatwhy.com/2014/07/31/the-mh17-downing-how-to-be-a-smart-news-consumer/

IX

Updated links, 7 August 2014:

Author: By Ian Shilling (Ian56789).

1) John Kerry Says the Rebels Downed MH17 In Ukraine. How Can He Know? Questions For John Kerry (21 July 2014)

2) The evidence is building that the Kiev military shot down Malaysian Airlines Flight MH17 in Ukraine (17 July 2017)

Source for the two links above: http://ian56.blogspot.se

X

Updated links, 4 September 2014:

Author: By Mike Whitney, in Counter Punch.

“The Downing of Malaysia Flight 17 – Sinister Pretext for War with Russia”

XI

Updated links, 9 September 2014:

Commenting summary of findings of the Preliminary report (link above, go to page 29 for Summary).

By M. Ferrada de Noli

“The last radio transmissions made by Dnipropetrovs’k air traffic control centre to flight

MH17 began at 13.20:00 hrs and ended at 13.22:02 hrs. The crew did not respond to

these transmissions.” | “The last radio transmission made by the crew began at 13.19:56 hrs and ended at13.19:59 hrs.”

Why Control called MH 17 by the same moment, or immediately after it was hit (communications interrupted) and not before?. And most importtant, why the conversations are not transcribed? Ten days before the Report was published, the Russian Deputy Minister of Defence, Anatoly Antonov, demanded anew the transcripts to be published by the authoriies with acces to the materials. Why they have neglected this relevant request, while it is absolutely (technically) feasible to do it?

“According to radar data three commercial aircraft were in the same Control Area as flight MH17 at the time of the occurrence. All were under control of Dnipro Radar. At 13.20 hrs the distance between the closest aircraft and MH17 was approximately 30 km.”

If there were other commercial aircraft in the radio of 30 kilometers fro MH17, it is preposterous to assume that the Rebels wished to down just MH17 and no the others. Or phrasing it in another way, why would not the Rebels downed the others aircraft too?

And why is not any mention of the Russia Minister of Defence reports on that they had established that one Ukraine jet-fighter was in the vicinity of MH17?

Damage observed on the forward fuselage and cockpit section of the aircraft appears to indicate that there were impacts from a large number of high-energy objects from outside the aircraft. That rather correspond to powerful machine gun of the type used by the S-25 cannons. The pattern of damage observed in the forward fuselage and cockpit section of the aircraft was not consistent with the damage that would be expected from any known failure mode of the aircraft, its engines or systems. That clearly indicate that the fire was directed at the cockpit, and that the communications interrupted with the killing of the crew. Finally: The damage observed in the forward section of the aircraft appears to indicate that the aircraft was penetrated by a large number of high-energy objects from outside the aircraft. It is likely that this damage resulted in a loss of structural integrity of the aircraft, leading to an in-flight break up. THIS, the last formulation in the transcript above, is the explanation of the fragmentation of the aircraft, and NOT that it would have been the result of a land-to-air missile.