Once again Reddit is caught censoring users who are not "convenient" and do not agree with all the "new moderators" brought in to take over the subs that deal discuss the current situation of Julian Assange who has gone missing since October 17th, 2016 following a sudden internet blackout and seige by police at the Ecuador Embassy on October 16th, 2016 as explained at these two links... http://yournewswire.com/julian-assan...anamo-express/ and http://www.opnlttr.com/letter/public...julian-assange The CIA rendition and takeover of Wikileaks may be their greatest coup ever and even Edward Snowden "does not disagree". But since he is hoping for a pardon from President Obama next month, he willnot comment further. Menwhile at reddit users who ask for "Verifiable Proof of Life" like DNA samples, a live face to face interview, handwriting samples, and fingerprints, are getting their posts down-voted or outright deleted. Moderator logs at WhereIsAssange have not been available for a week following the resignations of 3 top original mods in the last three months. Speculation now includes that even their user names have been hijacked to protest or disavow any allegations that the sub was compromised -just like Wikileaks.org and .com which now serves as a clever honeypot operation to identify future leakers and potential whistle blowers.Further evidence of the cesnorship is extreme bias towards users who insist Julian Assange was rendered and is now being tortured in America for the sources of government crimes (like arming ISIS, various murders, 911-Saudi- Huma Abedinlinks, and money laundering, and the role of the Clinton Foundation). With the presidential elections now over, public scrutiny has dropped off and the CIA and NSA have gotten "more aggressive" with Obama's blessings. Reddit itself had donated ober a million dollars to Hillary's campaign and was caught censoring posts that deeply incriminated her,while using their own moderators to have alternate user names to trash and demonize trump.Now those same mods, through their alt ids, are ridiculing users who say the sub is compromised or that Julian is being subjected to torture that has been well-documented in the past by amnesty international, Human Rights Watch and the U.N.:Jim Stone, Dr. Steve Pieczenik, Edward Snowden and most all Human Rights experts now agree that Julian Assange is no longer in the Ecuador Embassy in London, yet the MSM will not touch the subject as they are still under a media blackout order given by Obama on October 15th. It appears that Google is even cooperating by filtering search results for "Julian Assange is missing" as they will show those links containing the worfd "hoax" on the first page and no wordpress or anonymous posts about the subject.Also a moderator at Where is Assange, asked a user Perry-Mason to submit items proving his credibility and when Perry did so, the moderator (ThoriumWL) refused to post Perry's response and attachments verbatim. Instead he posted his own biased spin. https://www.reddit.com/r/WhereIsAssa...bruce_gorcyca/ Furthermore users of the subs are even noticing an effort to restrict controversial theories and basically cause disinterest to grow and prevail - driving more and more users away every day...People that mention Pamela Anderson could be setting up Julian for a fake rape charge (a real possibility) are down-voted en mass;Moderator even allow known government trolls to brek the sub's rules daily as they smear or accuse users of being shils if they do not agree that Julian is alive and well waiting in the London embassy for the internet connection to be restored! The two most obvious mole troll users are mjedmazga and smayonak . The original mods would have banned these guys after a single warning. But Thorium and new mods allow them continue to smear and "attack the messengers and not the message" Clearly there is some extreme bias and collusion since all the mods now at both Wikileaks and WhereIsAssange are like minded in that dissent willnot be tolerated in their subs. Users who suggest that the sub is compromised are allowed to comment once, but if they insist the sub is compromised and post proof of it, they are banned. The same applies if any user like "smellthiscoffee" provides proof that false information was posted and deliberately allowed to remain. And excellent videos like these get immediately downvoted and then quietly deleted:, and hereand hereIf people are truly concerned about the health and whereabouts of Julian Assange why would they downvote, hide, and delete threads like those above and this one