This article is a followup and correction from yesterday's post about the Seahawks salary cap with some theoretical scenarios that I had to abridge because they proved to be a pipe dream. I received a timely response tweet from Brian McIntyre, a longtime salary cap and blogging master who currently works for NFL.com's "Around the League" blog. Brian explained how the salary cap rollover really works, and it is not in the way I had hoped it would be -- which will henceforth be named the "Incredible Snowball Effect Cap Roll". More on that later...

First off, and as review for some, the Seahawks had the 5th largest cap rollover from 2011 to 2012 at $21.52M -- and have the 5th highest Adjusted Cap number right now at $142.96M. The Seahawks also have $8.47M in cap room as of today (though, John Clayton quoted $11 million this morning so it's possible the PFT numbers did not include the release of Mike Williams and his ~$3.5M contract). Again, I got these figures from a PFT blog dated July 15th, 2012 and a blog from Jason Laconfora on March 30th, 2012. When you subtract the current cap room of $8.47M from the Adjusted 2012 Seahawks Cap of $142.96M you get what I call "2012 Team Spend". Right now the Seahawks have spent $134.49M ($142.96 minus $8.47 = $134.49).

What's the significance of this $134.59M in current spent cap dollars?





SEAHAWKS SPENDING

As of today, the Seahawks are spending more than 29 other NFL teams. The only teams spending more than Seattle are the Denver Broncos, who spent a large chunk of their $26M rollover paying the highest profile free agent since Reggie White, Mr. Peyton Manning (and friends). They are spending $135.53M, only $1M more than Seattle. And who is Seattle neck-and-neck with? The friends from down south led by Mr. Jim Harbaugh, the San Francisco 49ers at $134.69M.

It's a dropoff from #3 Seattle at $134.49M to #4 Tampa at $130.35M, and a significant slide down to the median spend of about $122M in between the Oakland Raiders and St. Louis Rams. The Seahawks are outspending the #32 Tennessee Titans ($107.24M) by over $25M!

Now, fourteen 1st Round Draft Picks have yet to sign, so teams like Tampa and Dallas will jump up in their team spend, and have their available cap room and rollover decrease by the same amount. Cleveland has to sign both Brandon Weeden and Trent Richardson, and of course Indianapolis and Washington will have the biggest hit signing the top two draft picks, Andrew Luck and Robert Griffin III. These spending numbers will change as these fourteen picks are signed. These numbers will also swing back as NFL teams cut cap casualties in the next month and a half. More on this later...

HOW THE CAP ROLLOVER REALLY WORKS

I had erroneously hoped that a team could keep growing its adjusted salary cap, but alas -- it does reset and the rollover is pegged to the "base" NFL salary cap each year.

In the Seahawks case, I deduce that they spent $99M in salary cap in 2011, since the NFL league cap was $120M and they rolled $21M. There are things called "adjustments," which I won't get into in this blog, but the 2013 Seahawks Adjusted Cap worked out to be $143M (it's not as simple as $120 + $21 = $141M).

Right now the Seahawks are spending $134.5M in 2012 salary cap, and have $8.5M in cap room. If the Seahawks do not cut any of their 51 highest paid players out of the 89 currently on the roster, they will be able to roll $8.5M into 2013.

The league wide "base" salary cap in 2013 is expected to be $121M. 2014 "base" is expected to be $122M, and 2015 "base" is expected to be $125M. I have seen those estimated numbers used by John Clayton, Michael Lombardi and several others. So, right now, if the Seahawks do not cut any of their top 51 highest paid players, their 2013 Adjusted Cap will be $129.5M ($121 base + $8.5M rollover = $129.5M).

WHY I THINK MORE CUTS ARE COMING

If the Seahawks spend $134.5M in 2012, the most they will be able to spend in 2013 is $129.5M. I don't think it is ideal to reduce your cap by $5M. What's more, if the Seahawks spend $129.5M in 2013, they will roll zero into 2014, and be forced into the NFL base salary cap of $122M for the year 2014.

I don't think the Seahawks want to cut team spending by $5M in 2013, and then by another $7.5M in 2014.

I suspect, by the end of training camp, the Seahawks will trim their 2012 spend down to $131M, or perhaps even lower. At $131M, they will be able to roll $12M into 2013 (12 is always the magic number for me). If Seattle rolls $12M into 2013, they will have an adjusted cap of $133M (NFL base of $121M + $12M = $133M). If the Seahawks spend say, $128M in 2013, they can roll $5M into 2014 and have a 2014 adjusted cap of $127M.

If all of that looks like a big blur to you, just use this as a takeaway -- the Seahawks will be have to reduce spending from where they are today until at least 2015. I propose they reduce this spending more gradually than what they would be forced to do if they leave the 2012 cap situation "as is".

Why are 2013 and 2014 so important, in regards to creating rollover and keeping the Seahawks adjusted cap high? Because of Seahawk Unrestricted Free Agents looking for raises. In 2013 we are talking about Max Unger, Chris Clemons, Jason Jones and Alan Branch. There are others. In 2014 we are talking about Kam Chancellor, Doug Baldwin, Brandon Browner and more.

DEAD MONEY

Before you refuse to go out and buy the new Nike jersey for your favorite Seahawk, in fear he becomes a cap casualty -- let me throw in a caveat that may brighten your outlook. I believe there is significant dead money in the $134.5M '2012 Seahawks Spend'. At least, I hope there is. What is dead money? Dead money is the cap charge a team takes to their salary cap when they cut or trade a player. When big-time free agents and high draft picks get signed, they receive substantial signing bonuses. Those signing bonuses are paid in cash, but the team is able to prorate the signing bonus over the life of the contract (with a limit of five years).

The ability to prorate a signing bonus is why the Ravens 2012 cap situation actually improved after signing Ray Rice to a long-term deal. Before the signing of Rice the Ravens had less than $1M in cap room. The Saints cap situation in 2012 improved as well after they signed Drew Brees. Why? Again, because the signing bonuses are pro-rated over the life of the contract and in some situations the base salary in year one of the deal is low.

Back to dead money. When a high priced player is cut, the remaining proration is accelerated into the current year, and if the player is cut after June 1st, the proration is split between the current year and the next league year.

There is some Colin Cole dead money packed into the current Seahawks 2012 salary cap - as he was cut after June 1st, 2011. There may also be some dead money tied to Marcus Trufant (who was released from his original 2008 deal that had a $10M signing bonus). There may or may not be dead money tied to Aaron Curry, as I know his deal was restructured before he was traded, but I am leaning toward the "there is dead money in the 2012 cap tied to Aaron Curry" camp. There may be a little Stacey Andrews (remember him?) dead money. I could go on, but do you want to be reminded of Kentwan Balmer?

The thing is, there will always be dead money, every team has some, and every team will have some because the best teams and the worst teams all cut players every year. Hopefully this amount decreases in the future under the current regime. If that amount drops in 2013 the Seahawks are in good shape.

MY PROPOSED CAP FUTURE FOR THE SEAHAWKS VS THE NFL

Again, I propose the Seahawks trim some more weight this year to create more cap room in 2013 and 2014. My proposal is below with a plausible scenario for what I think the the Median NFL will do in the next 3-4 years. The Seahawks have a cap advantage in 2012 and 2013 (and hopefully 2014) because they rolled $21M from 2011 while the Median NFL team rolled only $7M.

NFC WEST FOES

The NFC, as a whole, is behind the AFC in terms of cap room in 2012 and 2013. In fact, 10 of the 16 NFC teams are in the bottom half in terms of 2012 Adjusted Cap. Arizona has a 2012 Adjusted Cap of only $123.8M, and St. Louis is below the median of about $128M at $125.49M.

San Francisco is in the top quartile in 2012 with an Adjusted Cap of $138.08M. Unfortunately, for San Francisco, they have only $3.39M in cap room, so unless they cut players, their 2013 Adjusted Cap will very likely be in the bottom half of the NFL at an estimated $124.39M. In fact, in 2013, the other three NFC West teams are poised to be in the bottom half of the NFL in terms of Adjusted Cap room barring some big changes.

However, the Seahawks should be in the 2013 2nd quartile if they stand pat, and can be in the top-8 with a bit of trimming in the next two months.