Nationalism is beautiful when it involves commitment to an essentially decent nation and when it welcomes other people’s commitment to their nations. Nationalism is evil when it is used to celebrate an evil regime, when it celebrates a nation as inherently superior to all others and when it denigrates all other national commitments.



One should add that nationalism is evil when it celebrates race, but that is not nationalism; it is racism. Nationalism and racism may be conjoined, as German Nazism did. But they are not definitionally related. While some Americans have conjoined American nationalism with race (such as the Confederacy, the Ku Klux Klan and currently various fringe “white identity” movements), American nationalism, based as it is on the motto “e pluribus unum” (“out of many, one”), by definition includes Americans of all races and ethnicities. That is how conservatives define American nationalism. I have never met a conservative who defined American national identity as definitionally “white.”

The intensity of the ongoing neoclown campaign against Western nationalism and the shamelessness with which they are attempting to redefine the perfectly straightforward concepts of "nationalism" and "Western civilization" indicates that they know they are on their way out. Again. In his recent column, (((Dennis Prager))) offers the precise opposite of "clarity " about nationalism:Notice the way in which the horrifically deceptive devil's son completely omits both the most relevant definition of nationalism from the dictionary as well as its etymological roots. He is truly of his father, the deceiver.Nationalism is, by logic, linguistics, and definition, aof racism because nation is a subset of race. The only "nationalism" that is not intrinsically related to race is civic nationalism, which is not nationalism at all, but an ersatz paperwork substitute for it.The irony, of course, is that these neoclowns are attempting to destroy American nationalism in the interests of their own nation. They are pure and unmitigated evil, all the more so for their attempt to disguise themselves as intellectual wolves in sheep's clothing. But they are not particularly bright intellectual wolves, as it is more than a little amusing to see how (((Prager)))'s own definition of evil nationalism obviously applies to the Jewish variety.Phelps points out that (((Prager))) also lies about "".This is an ABSOLUTE lie. It never meant, "out of many races", it explicitly meant "out of many states, one confederation." That is why it is the United STATES, not United Races.

Labels: nationalism, neoclowns