1. Lewis, G. N. The atom and the molecule. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 38, 762–785 (1916).

2. Neidig, M. L., Clark, D. L. & Martin, R. L. Covalency in f-element complexes. Coord. Chem. Rev. 257, 394–406 (2013).

3. Kaltsoyannis, N. & Kerridge, A. in The Chemical Bond: Chemical Bonding across the Periodic Table (eds Frenking, G. & Shaik, S.) 337–355 (Wiley, Weinheim, 2014).

4. Cary, S. K. et al. Emergence of californium as the second transitional element in the actinide series. Nat. Commun. 6, 6827 (2015).

5. Ferrier, M. G. et al. Spectroscopic and computational investigation of actinium coordination chemistry. Nat. Commun. 7, 12312 (2016).

6. Dutkiewicz, M. S., Apostolidis, C., Walter, O. & Arnold, P. L. Reduction chemistry of neptunium cyclopentadienide complexes: from structure to understanding. Chem. Sci. 8, 2553–2561 (2017).

7. Windorff, C. J. et al. Identification of the formal +2 oxidation state of plutonium: synthesis and characterization of {Puii[C 5 H 3 (SiMe 3 ) 2 ] 3 }−. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 3970–3973 (2017).

8. Jung, J., Atanasov, M. & Neese, F. Ab initio ligand-field theory analysis and covalency trends in actinide and lanthanide free ions and octahedral complexes. Inorg. Chem. 56, 8802–8816 (2017).

9. Cross, J. N. et al. Covalency in americium(iii) hexachloride. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 8667–8677 (2017).

10. Formanuik, A. et al. Actinide covalency measured by pulsed electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy. Nat. Chem. 9, 578–583 (2017).

11. Vitova, T. et al. The role of the 5f valence orbitals of early actinides in chemical bonding. Nat. Commun. 8, 16053 (2017).

12. Wilson, R. E., De Sio, S. & Vallet, V. Protactinium and the intersection of actinide and transition metal chemistry. Nat. Commun. 9, 622 (2018).

13. The bottom line. Nat. Chem. 9, 831 (2017).

14. Monreal, M. J. & Diaconescu, P. L. The riches of uranium. Nat. Chem. 2, 424 (2010).

15. Li Manni, G. et al. Assessing metal–metal multiple bonds in Cr–Cr, Mo–Mo, and W–W compounds and a hypothetical U–U compound: a quantum chemical study comparing DFT and multireference methods. Chem. Eur. J. 18, 1737–1749 (2012).

16. Penchoff, D. A. & Bursten, B. E. Metal–metal bonding in the actinide elements: conceptual synthesis of a pure two-electron U–U f δ single bond in a constrained geometry of U 2 (OH) 10 . Inorg. Chim. Acta 424, 267–273 (2015).

17. Foroutan-Nejad, C., Vicha, J., Marek, R., Patzschke, M. & Straka, M. Unwilling U–U bonding in U 2 @C 80 : cage-driven metal–metal bonds in di-uranium fullerenes. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 24182–24192 (2015).

18. Qu, N., Su, D.-M., Wu, Q.-Y., Shi, W.-Q. & Pan, Q.-J. Metal–metal multiple bond in low-valent diuranium porphyrazines and its correlation with metal oxidation state: a relativistic DFT study. Comput. Theor. Chem. 1108, 29–39 (2017).

19. Zhang, X. et al. U 2 @I h (7)-C 80 : crystallographic characterization of a long-sought dimetallic actinide endohedral fullerene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 3907–3915 (2018).

20. Scheibe, B. et al. The [U 2 F 12 ]2− anion of Sr[U 2 F 12 ]. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 2914–2918 (2018).

21. Lyon, J. T., Hu, H.-S., Andrews, L. & Li, J. Formation of unprecedented actinide≡carbon triple bonds in uranium methylidyne molecules. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 18919–18924 (2007).

22. Hu, H.-S., Qiu, Y.-H., Xiong, X.-G., Schwarz, W. H. E. & Li, J. On the maximum bond multiplicity of carbon: unusual C–U quadruple bonding in molecular CuO. Chem. Sci. 3, 2786–2796 (2012).

23. Hayton, T. W. Recent developments in actinide-ligand multiple bonding. Chem. Commun. 49, 2956–2973 (2013).

24. Hlina, J. A., Pankhurst, J. R., Kaltsoyannis, N. & Arnold, P. L. Metal–metal bonding in uranium-group 10 complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 3333–3345 (2016).

25. Ephritikhine, M. Molecular actinide compounds with soft chalcogen ligands. Coord. Chem. Rev. 319, 35–62 (2016).

26. Fox, A. R., Bart, S. C., Meyer, K. & Cummins, C. C. Towards uranium catalysts. Nature 455, 341–349 (2008).

27. Liddle, S. T. The renaissance of non-aqueous uranium chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 8604–8641 (2015).

28. Halter, D. P., Heinemann, F. W., Bachmann, J. & Meyer, K. Uranium-mediated electrocatalytic dihydrogen production from water. Nature 530, 317–321 (2016).

29. Arnold, P. L. & Turner, Z. R. Carbon oxygenate transformations by actinide compounds and catalysts. Nat. Rev. Chem. 1, 0002 (2017).

30. Bursten, B. E. & Ozid, G. A. Xα-SW calculations for naked actinide dimers: on the existence of ϕ bonds between metal atoms. Inorg. Chem. 23, 2910–2911 (1984).

31. Pepper, M. & Bursten, B. E. Ab initio studies of the electronic structure of the diuranium molecule. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112, 7803–7804 (1990).

32. Gagliardi, L. & Roos, B. Quantum chemical calculations show that the uranium molecule U 2 has a quintuple bond. Nature 433, 848–851 (2005).

33. Roos, B. O., Malmqvist, P.-Å. & Gagliardi, L. Exploring the actinide–actinide bond: theoretical studies of the chemical bond in Ac 2 , Th 2 , Pa 2 , and U 2 . J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 17000–17006 (2006).

34. Gorokhov, L. N., Emelyanov, A. M. & Khodeev, Y. S. Mass-spectroscopic investigation of stability of gaseous U 2 O 2 and U 2 . High Temp. 12, 1307–1309 (1974).

35. Pyykkö, P. & Desclaux, J.-P. Relativity and the periodic system of elements. Acc. Chem. Res. 12, 276–281 (1979).

36. Reiher, M. & Wolf, A. Relativistic Quantum Chemistry: The Fundamental Theory of Molecular Science (Wiley, Weinheim, 2009).

37. Dyall, K. G. & Fægri, K. Introduction to Relativistic Quantum Chemistry (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2007).

38. Saue, T. Relativistic Hamiltonians for chemistry: a primer. Chem Phys Chem 12, 3077–3094 (2011).

39. Christiansen, P. A. & Pitzer, K. S. Electronic structure and dissociation curves for the ground states of Tl 2 and T1 2 + from relativistic effective potential calculations. J. Chem. Phys. 74, 1162–1165 (1981).

40. Saue, T., Fægri, K. & Gropen, O. Relativistic effects on the bonding of heavy and superheavy hydrogen halides. Chem. Phys. Lett. 263, 360–366 (1996).

41. Blaise, J. & Wyart, J. F. Selected Constants Energy Levels and Atomic Spectra of Actinides (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 1992); http://web2.lac.u-psud.fr/lac/Database/Contents.html

42. Herzberg, G. Zum Aufbau der zweiatomigen Moleküle. Z. Phys. 57, 601–630 (1929).

43. Roos, B. O., Borin, A. C. & Gagliardi, L. Reaching the maximum multiplicity of the covalent chemical bond. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46, 1469–1472 (2007).

44. Shaik, S. et al. Quadruple bonding in C 2 and analogous eight-valence electron species. Nat. Chem. 4, 195–200 (2012).

45. Shaik, S., Rzepa, H. S. & Hoffmann, R. One molecule, two atoms, three views, four bonds? Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 3020–3033 (2013).

46. Schwerdtfeger, P. in The Chemical Bond: Fundamental Aspects of Chemical Bonding (eds Frenking, G. & Shaik, S.) 383–404 (Wiley, Weinheim, 2014).

47. Demissie, T. B., Garabato, B. D., Ruud, K. & Kozlowski, P. M. Mercury methylation by cobalt corrinoids: relativistic effects dictate the reaction mechanism. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 11503–11506 (2016).

48. Gaggioli, C. A. et al. Dioxygen insertion into the gold(i)–hydride bond: spin orbit coupling effects in the spotlight for oxidative addition. Chem. Sci. 7, 7034–7039 (2016).

49. Visscher, L. et al. DIRAC, a relativistic ab initio electronic structure program Release DIRAC17 (2017); http://www.diracprogram.org

50. Balasubramanian, K. Relativity and chemical bonding. J. Phys. Chem. 93, 6585–6596 (1989).

51. Maurice, R. et al. Effective bond orders from two-step spin–orbit coupling approaches: the I 2 , At 2 , IO+, and AtO+ case studies. J. Chem. Phys. 142, 094305 (2015).

52. Gagliardi, L., Pyykkö, P. & Roos, B. O. A very short uranium–uranium bond: the predicted metastable U 2 2+. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 7, 2415–2417 (2005).

53. Jong, W. A. D., Visscher, L. & Nieuwpoort, W. C. On the bonding and the electric field gradient of the uranyl ion. J. Mol. Struct. THEOCHEM 458, 41–52 (1999); corrigendum 581, 259 (2002).