

No kidding. I just came across and read through the Jim Stone "report" which can be found here: www.jimstonefreelance.com...



Is what Jim Stone 100% accurate? Probably not. Does that automatically make everything he said re: this matter a bunch of BS? Absolutely NOT. * Jan 2010 Japan offered to enrich Uranium for Iran's Nuclear Program, (Israel's real happy about that right?)

www.ynetnews.com... * A few months later, a group of 12 Israeli's (Magna BSP security company) are hired to install "cameras" that have been pointed out look very similar to mini-nukes. www.henrymakow.com... * A WEEK before the disaster, all 12 of them return to Israel. (hello? 9/11 anyone??) * March 11, 2011. All hell breaks loose. * report: June 2012. STUXNET confirmed to be joint US/Israeli venture. Did I mention that STUXNET infected the Natanz plant in Iran, around the same time Iran was talking to Japan about acquiring enriched uranium?? www.theregister.co.uk... Anyone ever heard of HAARP?? * Ionosphere goes bonkers above epicenter days before quake.

www.technologyreview.com...

www.humanresonance.org... So again, is Jim Stone the ultimate authority on what happened in Japan March 2011? No. However there are enough bits of info here that have to make any objective person at least stop and think for a minute.

There are too many dots here for this to be some crazy theory or just random coincidence.

