New York Times editors said Sunday that although the paper's reporters had been digging through WikiLeaks trove of 250,000 State Department cables for "several weeks," the online whistleblower wasn't the source of the documents.

But if WikiLeaks--which allegedly obtained the cables from a 22-year-old army private--wasn't the Times source, than who was? Apparently, The Guardian--one of the five newspapers that had an advanced look at the cables--supplied a copy of the cables to The Times.