On August 4, SC Koyal, an assistant solicitor general of the government of India at the Gauhati High Court, and Bijon Mahajan, a spokesman for the ruling Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), filed a criminal complaint against the English-language magazine Outlook, its publisher, Indranil Roy, its editor, Krishna Prasad, and Dixit. The complaint alleged that a July 29 story Dixit wrote forOutlook violated Indian laws against inciting hatred between groups, according to the Assam Tribune. The story accused members of the Hindu nationalist group Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) of trafficking 31 girls of tribal background in the northeastern state of Assam to other parts of India in an effort to inculcate them with a nationalist ideology.

Dixit’s story was widely circulated on social media. Since then, internet users have published photos of Dixit and her husband, sent her abusive tweets, and called for her arrest, according to social media posts reviewed by CPJ.

In an open letter published on the news website Daily News and Analysis, Priti Gandhi, a national executive member of the BJP’s women’s wing, denied the allegations raised in the Outlook report. The RSS is the ideological fountainhead of the BJP, the party of government both in Assam and at the federal level.

According to Outlook, a July 29 report in Cobrapost, and an August 7 open letterfrom civil society activists and journalists, police have not sought charges in response to the allegations of child trafficking, despite requests from the Assam State Commission for the Protection of Child Rights and the Child Line India Foundation, a nongovernmental organization. At the time of publication, Assam Superintendent of Police Prasanta Saikia had not responded to an emailed request for comment CPJ sent yesterday. Repeated phone calls to the Assam police headquarters did not go through.

“Faced with troubling allegations of child trafficking, Indian police have chosen to pursue the messengers: Neha Dixit and Outlook magazine,” said CPJ Asia Program Senior Research Associate Sumit Galhotra. “Indian authorities should ensure that journalists can do their work freely and safely, without fear of harassment.”

In their complaint, Koyal and Mahajan alleged that a portion of Dixit’s report violated section 153A of the Indian Penal Code, which criminalizes promotion of “disharmony or feelings of enmity, hatred or ill-will between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities,” online news websiteScroll reported. India’s Supreme Court has in its rulings narrowed the scope of this and other laws limiting speech, but human rights groups have found that state governments and local courts continue to apply the laws inconsistently.

CPJ research shows that section 153A of the Penal Code, a colonial-era provision, has been used to attempt to silence journalists, writers, and academics in India. The provision was invoked against Pushp Sharma of the Milli Gazette in May 2016 and against Shirin Dalvi of the Urdu-language Avadhnama in 2015.

This article has been re-published with the permission of Committee to Protect Journalists. Visit the website here