The United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination is assigned to combat racism around the world. Yesterday the committee’s “early warning” was publicized against the United States. The startling move is typically used to signal a potential civil war. The rare “urgent action procedure” was fueled by the recent demonstrations, and specifically noted the Charlottesville, Virginia conflict between Soros-paid thugs. However, the real intent was designed to shame the president and issue the warning to him.

The committee is part of the U.N. human rights office, a group that has historically ignored the human right violations of Muslim nations. It is designed to monitor compliance with the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, which was ratified by the U.S. under slick Willie’s rule.

Many conservatives and independent human rights groups are scoffing at the “warning” and are angry with the U.N’s involvement into a matter that they have no business issuing judgments about. The incident was minor compared to other countries’ unrest.

Anne Bayefsky, director of the Touro Institute on Human Rights and the Holocaust and president of Human Rights Voices is already reminding reporters of the council’s long history of both anti-U.S. bias and “notorious selectivity.” She told Fox News that its previous actions have made “it hard to take them seriously.”

As a NGO delegate at the Human Rights Council, she warned of another “anti-American outburst,” such as when the “former U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights questioning the legality of killing of Usama bin Laden.”

She added, “These same authorities on racism champion the U.N.’s racist Durban Declaration, support the U.N.’s rampant discriminatory treatment of the Jewish state, and turn a blind eye to modern forms of antisemitism. So their sudden concern with antisemitism in the United States appears disingenuous, to say the least.” And, she’s absolutely right.

Bayefsky and Hillel Neuer of U.N. Watch have been repeatedly attacked and ignored by the council for trying to speak the truth. In fact, the Human Rights Council was created in 2006 to replace the Commission on Human Rights, which was repeatedly condemned for bias. Although the U.N. established the state of Israel in 1947 (or, some say God established it according to Ezekiel 37:1-14), over the past fifty years the entire body has steadily grown in Antisemitism sentiment. Now, they frequently attack the U.S too.

For example, John Dugard, the notorious “Special Rapporteur” on Israel and the Palestinian territories, worked for the Commission from 2001 to 2008. He was given a mandate “to investigate human rights violations by Israel only, not by Palestinians.” The bias and deliberate design of the council, and the previous commission, is to verbally condemn the only countries left where freedom still exists in the world. They use the guise of racism to accomplish it.

The “white nationalists” in Charlottesville, VA do not represent the country and are few in number (no one knows the true numbers, although many liberal groups claim to). However, the U.N. committee is treating the incident as if the entire nation was infested. Perhaps they’ve been watching the mainstream media news.

“We are alarmed by the racist demonstrations, with overtly racist slogans, chants and salutes by white nationalists, neo-Nazis, and the Ku Klux Klan, promoting white supremacy and inciting racial discrimination and hatred,” committee head Anastasia Crickley said in a statement.

Something else that is alarming is when a peaceful family having dinner were brutally slaughtered as a form of Palestinian resistance, but the U.N. still blames Israel. Especially when the mother of the vile murderer praised her son’s vicious act.

President Trump has shouldered false accountability for his comments about the incident, which were distorted and ignored by the leftist media, and for his supposed supporters. However, more and more evidence points to a complete liberal orchestration of the events. Almost none of the people involved even lived there.

Of course, none of that matters to the U.N. committee. They’re filled with unholy glee at the opportunity to slam President Trump for something that is not his fault. Many people have pointed out that these statues in contention have been standing for decades, especially during the last eight years of the Obama regime, but no one mentioned tearing them down before.

The U.N. warning is supposed to prevent “existing problems from escalating into conflict” or to “prevent a resumption of conflict where it has previously occurred,” but no one knows how that could occur. Does the U.N. propose sending troops to the United States?

It urged “high-level politicians and public officials, to unequivocally and unconditionally reject and condemn racist hate speech.” However, there is already a Justice Department investigation being conducted concerning the incident.

Although the U.N committee issued the “warning” against the United States on August 18, it has just now been reported. They responded after rioters in Arizona were effectively controlled.

Many conservatives understand that the move is simply a way to further the disparagement of the President, and spur additional unrest. These people who do not live here or know anything about the laws governing the nation need to butt out. They’ve got no business commenting on the actions of a small portion of the population.