Equal Rights to Profit from Impoverishing People and Causing a Great Extinction Event

The New York Times makes its money making sure that the ideological justifications for whatever the establishment wants to do are in place.

The NYT was a key part of selling the Iraq War. Their columnists, with only a couple exceptions, are intellectual mediocrities like Ross Douthat, whose job it is to be stupid on cue. They buried the Bush surveillance story until after the election of 2004 because they were scared that if Americans knew, Kerry might win. They have buried other stories because the White House or Pentagon or NSA did not want Americans to know.

The firing of Jill Abramson has made it clear that she, a woman, was paid less by the New York Times than a man would have been.

(Her real offense is probably that she was against the continued erosion of the barriers between advertising and editorial.)

Abramson was, to put it simply, not treated fairly, almost certainly because she was a woman.

I do not care.

It is not in my mandate to care if the Duchesses of Hell are treated as well as the Dukes of Hell.

Too many people in the West want only one thing: they want in on the evil gravy train. They see that there is a scam going on, a scam that impoverishes millions and helps create and maintain rape factories like in the Congo, and their response is “I want in on that gravy train! Why are women, and African-Americans and the working class and (insert discriminated class here) not on the gravy train too!”

They look at what CEOs make, or the banker bailouts, and they want the money; they want their own bailouts.

But what they don’t want to do is drain the swamp. They don’t want to change the way the world works so that having an iPhone doesn’t mean men and women in the Congo are being raped and murdered in a systematic fashion. In the Congo they will take their rape victims, bend them over and have every man in a military unit rape them. The blood flows like water.

A choice was made in the late 70s to 1980, not to drain the swamp. In fact, the choice was made then to increase evil and poverty in the world an the only reason one can say that it has decreased is China, who didn’t go along with the IMF/World Bank prescription.

This was a choice: as problematic as Carter was (and he was very) he suggested a different way: Americans resoundingly rejected it. The Brits elected Thatcher.

These acts of greed and selfishness; these acts of “I’ve got mine, fuck you Jack” had consequences.

Institutions like the New York Times exist to control the acceptable range of political and social discourse: they are ideological bodies who help ensure change occurs largely within the spectrum amenable to current elites. That is their job, and they are very very good at it.

If you are a member of these institutions and you do not do your job, you are gone. The problem with Abramson isn’t about pay, it’s that she wanted to try and keep editorial and advertising separate. I’m sure that being an “uppity” woman helped get her fired, to be sure, but it was the small bit of good she wanted to (or evil she wanted to prevent) that the publisher hated, that is far more problematic.

After the Iraq war invasion, the mainstream pundits who were against the war were fired, let go, or demoted. The ones who were for it (and who objectively were wrong about in terms of its success and costs) were promoted.

The system is designed to do something, and it does it. Those who do not play are gotten rid of.

Abramson mostly played, she’s no martyr. Even with what remains of the siloing, the NYTimes was still doing plenty of evil.

But even the royalty of Hell sometimes have twisted notions of honor.

If what people want is equal rights to profit from a system which is profoundly evil, and whose function is to enrich a few people by impoverishing many many more while maintaining rape colonies, I’m out. I’m not fighting for fairness in the neo-Imperialism business. “The best people at maintaining our project of impoverishing people and screwing up the world, causing a great extinction event, should be chosen objectively, without regards to ethnicity, gender, age or sexual preference” is not a hill I’m dying on.

Rivers of blood from the victims, dead and alive, have priority and all I want for the class of senior retainers whom Abramson is one of, and the oligarchical class whom she worked for, and who treated her unfairly (only half a million), is for them to have all their power and all the money and influence that buys them that power, taken from them.

If you enjoyed this article, and want me to write more, please DONATE or SUBSCRIBE.