Article content continued

PST

Oger, who lost the election by 400 votes, took the matter to the tribunal, claiming her human rights had been breached because the flyer was intended to discriminate and expose Oger to hatred. Whatcott claimed what he wrote in the flyer was an act of religious expression.

In the ruling, Cousineau described a five-day hearing during which Whatcott was wearing a white T-shirt with Oger’s face on it, and derogatory statements written underneath.

“In the hearing room for this complaint, we were witness to repeated, deliberate and flagrant attacks on Ms. Oger based on nothing more than a belief that her very existence is an affront,” Cousineau wrote, adding Whatcott continued to call Oger “he” and “mr” during the course of the hearing, despite being told not to.

Whatcott told the hearing that he produced the flyer after praying to God to ask how he could help in the election.

Photo by Bryan Schlosser / Regina Leader-Post

Cousineau noted “there is conflict in this case between Mr. Whatcott’s religious belief that he should do everything in his power to stop a transgender woman from being elected to public office, and Ms. Oger’s right — and the right of transpeople more broadly — to enjoy equal dignified participation in the political life of this province.”

The three-person tribunal ruled that Whatcott had discriminated against Oger based solely on her gender.

“In my view,” Cousineau wrote, “the flyer is a modern version of a ‘whites only’ sign. It is an attempt to block the doors of government with a message that the political realm is for ‘cisgender people only’.”

He said the discrimination was severe and it was an intentional effort to block Oger from participating in politics, based on gender.

The tribunal also ruled the flyer subjected Oger to hate, and referred to a case in Saskatchewan where Whatcott had previously distributed flyers that were ruled by the Supreme Court of Canada to be hateful.

Oger was cross-examined for four hours and 15 minutes by Whatcott’s lawyer.

Later in the hearing, she stated, “I’m a transgender woman. People kill transgender women because of who we are. And they start with this. And it’s impossible to tell whether this is the ramblings of a person who’s likely to do that, or if it’s not. After this flyer came out, I had to worry what Mr. Whatcott looked like, but I also had to worry about other people who maybe gave him credibility. … It’s a vulnerable place already to be a candidate. And to be a transgender candidate is really vulnerable. Because people listen to outrageous things like this.”

Oger said that she had to explain to her two children that “somebody hates me because of who I am.”