As you know, the number of Democrats calling for an end to the Electoral College is increasing by the day. Slate weighed in on the issue with this question:

Is the Electoral College a threat to democracy? https://t.co/QXxvQsIz81 — Slate (@Slate) March 21, 2019

And they got plenty of answers, few of which the Left wants to hear.

this ratio gives new meaning to ratios https://t.co/mY074ZZPtq — Josh Perry (@MrJoshPerry) March 22, 2019

Here for the ratio pic.twitter.com/KGESd96FsM — Neil Montovani (@neilmontovani) March 21, 2019

There’s an impressive ratio on this one thanks to an avalanche of reality checks:

It's a check on it. https://t.co/yvArtJplpW — Drew McCoy (@_Drew_McCoy_) March 22, 2019

siri what's a republic — Anthony Bialy (@AnthonyBialy) March 22, 2019

No, because we're not a democracy, dimwits. — JWF (@JammieWF) March 22, 2019

#civicsfail The Electoral College protects us from mob rule. https://t.co/6vecwW3RIc — Opal ? (@OpalGlow) March 22, 2019

Eliminating the EC is a threat to the Republic — Kevin Tyler (@KevinFishtyler) March 21, 2019

We aren't a democracy and never have been. It's only a threat to those who want the mob rule of the majority. — Brian (@bhg70) March 21, 2019

Maybe this is what they really meant:

You misspelled Democrats https://t.co/TB1uoTzpuo — scott coleman ? (@bandphan) March 22, 2019

That’s more accurate. But if Slate wants to know what’s really a “threat to democracy,” it’s questioning the results of an election, according to Hillary Clinton a week before the 2016 election:

Donald Trump refused to say that he’d respect the results of this election. That’s a direct threat to our democracy. — Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) October 24, 2016

Hmm, nothing about the Electoral College in that tweet. What happened?