@ caamib

Well since you asked nicely (by your standards) and put yourself on the spot with a promise you have no intention of keeping I'll enlighten you.

I said I was under psychiatric observation at 11, not institutionalized. I further clarified that I was at the hospital as part of an early study of childhood autism - Asperger's Syndrome in particular - but had a bad reaction during the "shits and giggles" drug testing phase resulting in what was described to me as a psychotic break. It served as an object lesson as to why you shouldn't ever have a "shits and giggles" phase of testing medication meant to alter people's behaviour. I also gave reasons why your version of the story was actually way cooler. (Page 2. Trying to link directly isn't working for some reason.)

The blue text is a link by the way. You click on it to get the information that is being referred to. I'm explicitly mentioning this because when people use links to reference things you act like they never gave you any information.

P.S.

I'm pretty sure the grammatically incorrect and slightly nonsensical phrasing of "would having sex" was the joke. Your attempt to backpedal on using very clear phrasing with zero wiggle room made it sound like that's what you were saying except you denounced the grammatically correct and clear phrasing of the sentiment later as well saying that it made no sense... which you followed up with the most basic fallacy of anyone who has ever considered committing a crime: deluding yourself into thinking you're too smart to get caught. If you think you're too smart to fail you're automatically to dumb to succeed even half-way. But you also denied that you meant you wouldn't get caught in the act because you claimed you didn't mean you would actually try anything in the first place. The only possible remaining meaning of "nothing anyone can do about it" if you weren't referring to making a physical attempt or harboring desires and fantasies is that nobody can do anything to help you succeed in bedding anyone 12 or older. Think about what you're saying ahead of time or consider how you might have said it better. You might actually sound intelligent if you put that tiny bit of effort into it. Just give a try. You'll surprise and stun us. It'll be awesome, I promise.

In the end your own insult towards the impersonator encapsulated exactly what they were trying to say to you. Thank you once more for the laughs.

But on a more serious not you keep saying you're being misunderstood but when you actually try to justify that it tends to be in ways that ignore or invert the meanings of words in the English language. I don't think it's the native English speakers that are having trouble clearly making their points. If it bothers you that much then just don't bother saying anything.

You stopped seeing your psychiatrist when he wouldn't commit murder for you which you deemed the only proof he could understand your problem, ergo, committing murder was a condition for you to remain his patient. How is this in any way incorrect? Also I used plural for shrinks because you've had several and stopped seeing many of them. When a court orders you to see a psychiatrist you can't legally stop without the court allowing it. If you try you are sent to a different one or to prison. Funny how the wording you used at the time implied that you started seeing them after the end of the trial as an alternative to getting sent to prison.

... Oh hell you just publicly admitted yet another crime, didn't you? Man for an oppressive government Croatia is fucking lax.