Is this an honest face?





I really don't know but I would like her to explain two things here publicly so we can see how she thinks and why she allowed perjured testimony from a Canadian lawyer to prevail over 3 eye witnesses. Also why did she deny the defendant in Prouse Dash & Crouch V Bruce Gorcyca to testify on his own behalf - supposedly a constitutional right?If anyone takes the time to read the transcripts of this case, the verbal comments of the judge show she has already presumed the defendant to be guilty simply because he is facing an extradition from Canada. Had she actually read the submissions (her comments reflect that she did not) she would have know the legality and legitimacy of the extradition was suspect since there was no indictment and not even any charging documents. She would have also known that the defendant was under two court orders not to leave the Province of Ontario and that is exactly why she should have allowed a video link for the defendant to testify and add a fourth testimony to prove Gilmour was lying through his teeth.Would she have been so quick to favor a fellow-lawyer had she known the plaintiff was just arrested for child abuse in Ontario and had been asked to retire or be fired from the RCMP for shooting an unarmed teenager in the back?In her submissions she had background information on Gorcyca indicating years of community service, his honorable discharge from the military and all the following yet she let his character be assailed by the plaintiff with information SHE KNEW TO BE FALSE (if she read the written submissions).* Married 24+ years - 4 kids (current marriage 17+ years)* 3 Bachelor degrees* Honors graduate from Padua High School* Former U.S. federal Treasury agent* Former Department of Justice employee* Former air traffic controller with the FAA* Former Fortune 500 Executive* No violence or substance abuse issues* 7 Year Red Cross Volunteer Safety Instructor* PADI Scuba Instructor* Pilot* Founder of 3 civic organizations, member of 5* Volunteer Salvation Army House Parent* HRS-Certified Volunteer AIDS Counselor* A Food Bank Volunteer* Little League & Soccer Coach for Kids* Former consultant to Governor Carlos Romero in Puerto Rico* A writer and an artistDespite all this she decided to give the 40 year old family home to a lawyer who without any doubt perjured himself when Gilmour testified that he never signed any retainer agreement with Gorcyca. In fact he said he was sure of it. 15 minutes later he was a handwritten retainer agreement with his original signature on it and some editing he did to the document after the defendant had already signed it. See for yourself here: http://ohiocourtroomcorruption.blogspot.com . Was the good judge asleep or doing crossword puzzles when this perjury took place?In the interests of justice I think this lady should offer to buy back the house she wrongfully gave away. She also needs to actually read written submissions and not jut rely on verbal presentations as she seems to do. The Ohio court of appeals seems to agree.