



This is a serious subject, not a joke, and this site is here to expose the actions of those who exploited these young men and defrauded us their fans. It is to defend the honor of everyone involved who did not take part in it willingly. It has become apparent to us in this extensive and painstaking research that there were never just four individual people known as "John", "Paul", "George", and "Ringo" who comprised one Rock & Roll band known as "The Beatles", and rose to fame as the world's first supergroup. For all intents and purposes as far as we can tell, no one such group ever existed. We are here to explore whether the original individuals themselves ever existed (and if so, what may have happened to them and by whom), but have not been able thus far to calculate how many of each persona were fraudulently presented to the world. Please join us at the forum if you care to and can be open-minded. This is a highly-emotional topic for many of us, and most of us have very strong feelings about it. We have started this work because we were once fans to varying degrees, and many of us still listen to and enjoy their music

* * * * *

Were there Multiple Beatles?

Since the Beginning?



The purpose of this site is to present evidence that the Beatles were always sets of multiples since their inception, and were not just four individual young men "from Liverpool", as we've been led to believe. We will be showing lots of pictures here as well as on the forum so that we may provide our evidence sufficiently.



I'm presenting here what I see as the top 4 clues as regards the Beatles being multiples. They're in no particular order, although I do begin with the clue that I noticed first when I began this research: Height Differences - sometimes from year to year, and sometimes within the same year.



I hope you will view this with an open mind, and then conduct your own research to see what you come up with as to whether this seems likely or not.



Be sure to see our forum thread on "Why The Use of Multiples?" if you don't understand the possible reasons behind the concept.









After that, see how we've compared the different Pauls during the same era by reading the 'sticky' topics here; read about the different Johns here; about the different Georges here; and the different Ringos here. We have a second forum which contains our research from early March 2012 onward, at Fab Four Dozen on Proboards, but I have quite posting there as of August 2013 (due to my distrust of Proboards and their dishonest business tactics), and am now mostly posting at CTRN.







Do you see anything strange here?

(OUCH!)

(OUCH!)



Beatles Height Comparisons









#1 Height Discrepancies



We've found that the Beatles fluctuate within various height ratios over the years.

~~~

Clue #1: Heights





#2 Different Eyebrows



It's interesting to note that there were different shapes, sizes and styles of eyebrows over the years.

~~~

Clue #2: Eyebrows

(Coming soon)





#3 Ears



The ears also fluctuated wildly with each Beatle, as to shape, size, placement on the head, and which type of earlobes they had (attached or unattached).

~~~

Clue #3: Ears

(Coming soon)





#4 Teeth



This is another issue that must be addressed. There is a definite difference in the teeth - back and forth as to size and shaping (though always holding the same pattern) - from time to time.

~~~

Clue #4: Teeth

(Coming soon)



