A female University of Cincinnati student claims she was slut-shamed when she was suspended for allegedly sexually assaulting a male student.

The male student accused 'Jane Roe' of sexual misconduct while he was too drunk to consent, following an incident that took place while they were both intoxicated, according to the Cincinnati Enquirer.

Roe filed the lawsuit this week stating that she was treated unfairly by the university while it conducted a Title IX investigation into the male student's claims and that his allegations were made in revenge for an earlier incident involving one of his friends.

The alleged sexual misconduct occurred in the fall of 2017, when both parties had been drinking excessively.

A female University of Cincinnati student has filed a lawsuit claiming that the school 'slut-shamed' her when suspending her for alleged sexual misconduct involving a male student

According to Roe's lawsuit, she and the male student left a party together and then walked back to his home, where the alleged misconduct occurred.

The lawsuit stated that the male student's roommates told a Title IX investigator that they tried to get Roe to leave, but that she would not. The male student himself told the investigator that she had started 'kissing and touching him.'

The male student apparently told the investigator that she asked him to have sex with her, but that he declined, although he admitted to using his finger to penetrate her.

In her lawsuit, Roe recounted a different version of events.

She said that the male student actually initiated the kissing and that he had taken her shirt off. When she asked 'if there was anything else' he was interested in doing together, she claims the male student said he wanted to go to sleep, so they fell asleep together.

After their encounter, Roe said the male student went to the Title IX office to report that he had been too drunk to consent to sexual activity with Roe, initiating the university's investigation into her alleged misconduct.

The female student, 'Jane Roe,' claimed that the male student's allegations were made in revenge for a previous sexual assault accusation she had lobbed against his friend

During the course of the university's investigation into the male student's claims, Roe's lawsuit stated that once it was discovered that the male student had participated in sexual activity with Roe while she herself was drunk, the investigators did not encourage her to file a complaint against him or launch an investigation into his behavior.

Roe's lawsuit also claimed that the male student's allegations were actually made in retaliation for a previous sexual assault accusation that Roe had made against one of his friends.

After the Title IX investigation into the male student's allegations, the university determined that Roe was 'responsible.'

She appealed the decision, but was ultimately suspended in February and only allowed to re-enroll once the male student graduates or is otherwise not matriculated.

In the lawsuit, Roe claimed that she was disciplined for 'engaging in the same sexual freedoms that men on the campus enjoy.'

'You have a woman who was the sexual aggressor, and the school doesn't really know how to deal with that situation,' Roe's attorney, Josh Engel, told the Cincinnati Enquirer.

The lawsuit also stated that Roe was treated unfairly by the school because it is 'facing pressure to prosecute females accused of sexual assault because it has been named a defendant in multiple lawsuits brought by men who alleged that UC discriminates against men.'

A University of Cincinnati spokesperson said in a statement to the newspaper that the school 'focuses on the well-being of our entire community and makes every effort to provide an equitable process that respects everyone’s rights and accommodates their needs.'