ShelLuser said: I don't think people who aren't directly involved with all that can draw such conclusions to be honest. Click to expand...

As to "hiding"; I think that was a right move to make. When it comes to applying a punishment to someone for whatever reason then that is something between the involved person and the people who came to that decision. There's no need to involve 3rd parties in my opinion, especially when those people don't have access to the same kind of information on which the team based their decision. Click to expand...

I think it can also help the punished person to move on. No risk for people who might endlessly keep referring back to that decision and holding it against the one who got punished. In the end most people will easily allow themselves to base their opinion on hearsay and one sided stories. Click to expand...

I do.I'm a "2nd person" in this equation, the one directly affected by the decision. Shouldn't at least *I* have access to the kind of information used as justification to expel me after after a tremendous amount of work and time donated to FreeBSD? And shouldn't *I* be allowed to share that information as I see fit?Which is why people are rightfully saying "We don't trust you. Give us a least a peek of what he did, otherwise we're gonna draw our own conclusions".You say this "helps" me. What helps me is the truth.Every day where leadership is not forthcoming looks worse and worse.If I broke the code of conduct in such a serious way, somebody would know, right?It should not be hard to provide, especially when I am not asking for privacy.They can publish the whole damn dossier. I don't care, I'm not ashamed of my actions.And with that --- refusal to provide can only be driven by embarrassment on their part.I've said from minute #1 that A) nothing they had would withstand scrutiny and B) because of that, nothing would be provided.So far I've been 100% accurate.The only thing that's left is personal, probably driven by 1 or 2 people. As COC is highly subjective and vague intentionally, enough people were swayed by BS arguments that they finally wore down enough for a majority vote. Now that significant backlash is occurring and they realize any "hard" evidence they have will cause further uproar, they're hiding behind protecting my privacy as a justification for not being transparent.I mean, I must have done something TERRIBLE right? Or many clear cut transgressions? How hard is proof of bad behavior really?ShelLuser, at some point you're going to be a lemming. Don't trust leadership so blindly, especially this leadership which has a history of people in authority making drastic decisions for questionable reasons.