In the previous articles we have covered the introduction to testing and how to test Phoenix Models and Controllers.

This time are going to cover the testing approach for Phoenix channels.

This article is the part of the testing in Elixir series:

As usual, we will use “Prater” project as our playground. We already have a functionality to join a room and send messages to other users. So let’s cover that functionality with tests.

Testing socket authentication

Every time a user visits a page we are authenticating the socket in order to distinguish one user from another. We signing the token with the user’s ID inside. Once user connected we are verifying the token and assign the user’s ID to the socket.

Here is the implementation of the connect function.

defmodule PraterWeb . UserSocket do # ... @max_age 24 * 60 * 60 def connect (%{ "token" => token }, socket ) do case Phoenix . Token . verify ( socket , "user token" , token , max_age: @max_age ) do { :ok , user_id } -> { :ok , assign ( socket , :current_user_id , user_id )} { :error , _reason } -> :error end end # ... end

Let’s start with the tests of that functionality.

At first, we need to create a test file test/prater_web/channels/user_socker_test.exs with the following content.

defmodule PraterWeb . UserSocketTest do use PraterWeb . ChannelCase , async: true alias PraterWeb . UserSocket test "authenticate with valid token" do token = Phoenix . Token . sign ( @endpoint , "user token" , 503 ) assert { :ok , socket } = connect ( UserSocket , %{ "token" => token }) assert socket . assigns . current_user_id == "503" end end

In a similar way to Models and Controllers, Phoenix provides us a helper module to test channels. It is called ChannelCase and it’s located in the test/support/channel_case.ex file.

The module provides us all required functionality to test channels.

First, we sign the token with the user’s ID. For now, it does not matter if that user exists or not. Then, we are connecting to the socket and check if the connection was successful. As the last step, we check the assigned value of current_user_id to be sure it is the correct one.

And on a contrary, we can test unsuccessful connects.

test "authenticate with invalid token" do assert :error = connect ( UserSocket , %{ "token" => "invalid-token" }) assert :error = connect ( UserSocket , %{}) end

The first assert checks the connection with an invalid token. It is invalid because we didn’t sign it. The second asset checks the connection with the missing token parameter.

That is pretty much it for testing socket authentication.

Testing channel subscription

When a user visits the room’s page the second thing we do after the socket authentication is subscribing him to a room’s channel.

That is the implementation of the join/3 function. First, we are sending “after_join” event to track the presence (later about that). Then we are responding back with the list of messages. We also assign the room’s ID to the socket.

defmodule PraterWeb . RoomChannel do # ... def join ( "room:" <> room_id , _params , socket ) do send ( self (), :after_join ) { :ok , %{ messages: Conversation . list_messages ( room_id )}, assign ( socket , :room_id , room_id ) } end # ... end

Let’s start with the test for checking the correct assignment of a room’s ID to the socket. We need to create a test file test/prater_web/channels/room_channel_test.exs and add a first test.

defmodule PraterWeb . RoomChannelTest do use PraterWeb . ChannelCase alias Prater . Conversation alias PraterWeb . UserSocket import Prater . AuthHelpers test "assigns room_id to the socket after join" do user = create_user ( "user@example.com" ) { :ok , room } = Conversation . create_room ( user , %{ name: "Lobby" }) token = Phoenix . Token . sign ( @endpoint , "user token" , user . id ) { :ok , socket } = connect ( UserSocket , %{ "token" => token }) { :ok , _ , socket } = subscribe_and_join ( socket , "room: #{ room . id } " , %{}) assert socket . assigns . room_id == " #{ room . id } " end end

First, let’s look to our assertment and then we will figure out why do we need so much code for that.

We are trying to test what the socket has a correct room ID assigned to it.

That means we need to have a room in the database. In order to create a room, we also need to have a user. The first two lines are responsible for that. Then we need to authenticate a user. We do that in the same way as we did in the socket authentication section. And finally, we need to subscribe to the channel. That is when the join/3 function would be triggered.

In a similar way, we can test if join/3 function responds with the list of messages.

test "returns the list of messages after join" do user = create_user ( "user@example.com" ) { :ok , room } = Conversation . create_room ( user , %{ name: "Lobby" }) token = Phoenix . Token . sign ( @endpoint , "user token" , user . id ) { :ok , socket } = connect ( UserSocket , %{ "token" => token }) Conversation . create_message ( user , room , %{ "content" => "Hello from Test" }) { :ok , messages , _ } = subscribe_and_join ( socket , "room: #{ room . id } " , %{}) messages_template = %{ messages: [ %{ content: "Hello from Test" , user: %{ username: user . username }} ] } assert messages == messages_template end

The as in the previous example we are creating a user, a room and authenticate the socket. But this time, before we join we also need to create a message because we want to get something back. After that, we are subscribing to a room’s channels and expecting to get a list of messages back. And we do.

Both tests are working, but we have a duplication logic. That means we need to stop and refactor.

We can extract the repetitive behavior into the setup block.

setup do user = create_user ( "user@example.com" ) { :ok , room } = Conversation . create_room ( user , %{ name: "Lobby" }) token = Phoenix . Token . sign ( @endpoint , "user token" , user . id ) { :ok , socket } = connect ( UserSocket , %{ "token" => token }) { :ok , socket: socket , user: user , room: room } end

Now we need to update the attributes of the test macros and fetch socket , user , and room .

test "assigns room_id to the socket after join" , %{ socket: socket , room: room } do # ... end

and

test "returns list of messages after join" , %{ socket: socket , user: user , room: room } do # ... end

And now that part of the join/3 function is well tested.

Testing Presence

That is not everything our join/3 function does. We are also using the “Presence” functionality.

That is how the function looks like. Once a user subscribed to a channel, we are sending “after_join” event.

def join ( "room:" <> room_id , _params , socket ) do send ( self (), :after_join ) { :ok , %{ messages: Conversation . list_messages ( room_id )}, assign ( socket , :room_id , room_id ) } end

Which in the end triggers the following callback

def handle_info ( :after_join , socket ) do push socket , "presence_state" , Presence . list ( socket ) user = find_user ( socket ) { :ok , _ } = Presence . track ( socket , "user: #{ user . id } " , %{ typing: false , user_id: user . id , username: user . username }) { :noreply , socket } end

where we send “presence_state” event.

Let’s test it now.

test "broadcasting presence" , %{ socket: socket , user: user , room: room } do { :ok , _ , socket } = subscribe_and_join ( socket , "room: #{ room . id } " , %{}) user_data = %{ typing: false , user_id: user . id , username: user . username } assert_push "presence_state" , user_data assert_broadcast "presence_diff" , user_data end

Now we don’t need to create a room and authenticate the socket. We already do that in the setup block. All we need to do is to subscribe to a channel and check of “presence_state” has been pushed to a channel and “presence_diff” has been broadcasted. Both events should contain a user’s data we are expecting.

And we are done with the presence.

Testing broadcasting

When a user writes a message in the chat. We are pushing a new event to a channel. Then we are trying to create a message in the database. If we succeeded we are broadcasting a “new_message” event to all subscribers.

That is the implementation of that function

def handle_in ( "message:add" , %{ "message" => content }, socket ) do room = Conversation . get_room! ( socket . assigns [ :room_id ]) user = find_user ( socket ) case Conversation . create_message ( user , room , %{ content: content }) do { :ok , message } -> message = Repo . preload ( message , :user ) message_template = %{ content: message . content , user: %{ username: message . user . username }} broadcast! ( socket , "room: #{ message . room_id } :new_message" , message_template ) { :reply , :ok , socket } { :error , _reason } -> { :reply , :error , socket } end end

That is how the test would look like.

test "adding a new message" , %{ socket: socket , user: user , room: room } do { :ok , _ , socket } = subscribe_and_join ( socket , "room: #{ room . id } " , %{}) ref = push ( socket , "message:add" , %{ "message" => "I'm a new msg" }) assert_reply ref , :ok , %{} msg = get_last_message () msg_template = %{ content: msg . content , user: %{ username: user . username }} broadcast_event = "room: #{ msg . room_id } :new_message" assert_broadcast "presence_diff" , %{} assert_broadcast broadcast_event , msg_template refute is_nil ( msg ) end defp get_last_message do alias Prater . Conversation . Message import Ecto . Query Prater . Repo . one ( from m in Message , order_by: [ desc: m . id ], limit: 1 ) end

First, we are subscribing to a channel. After that we are emulating an “message:add” event. On the first milestone, we are using assert_reply to check the successful reply. Then, we fetch the last message in the database and prepare the expected template. The function creates a new message in the database, so in that test, we want to be sure we are broadcasting the message we just created. Then we check if the event has been broadcasted and the message exists in the database.

In that example I’m also using assert_broadcast "presence_diff", %{} before the actual broadcast assert. I’ve figured it out in an experimental way. I’ve noticed that without assert_broadcast "presence_diff", %{} the assert_broadcast broadcast_event, msg_template is always succeeding even if I comment out the actual broadcasting. That behavior still puzzles me. If you know more about that would be happy to learn about that form the comments below.

Wrapping Up

So, we are one more step further in the Elixir learning. This time we have learned how to test the sockets layer of Phoenix applications. Now we know how to test the socket authentication, how to test the response of the join function, the presence functionality and check that our stuff is properly broadcasted.

Yet still, that is not everything about testing we are still missing the proper integration testing.

See you next time.

All the changes you can find in the GitHub page of the project.