Hamas is a radical Islamic Palestinian nationalist movement founded in 1987 that had long called for the destruction of Israel. Hamas won legislative elections in Palestine in 2006. The U.S. is a strong ally to Israel and deems Hamas a terror group, as do many western nations, citing suicide bombings and mortar attacks that killed hundreds of civilian and military targets in Israel starting in the mid-1990s.

The criticism after Gilchrist’s tweets circulated online last week was furious, and within days Gilchrist released a statement taking it back, saying he had “waded into a complex geopolitical issue and made comments about a conflict I did not fully understand.” Gilchrist now says he supports Israel and calls Hamas a terrorist group.

Whitmer, meanwhile, said in interviews after the 16-second video clip that while “ICE has become the face of the most horrendous, horrific, heartbreaking action that has happened under the Trump administration,” she is not calling for the agency to be disbanded.

CONCLUSION

While voters are motivated by a host of issues ‒ including perhaps whether their political leaders are antagonistic toward Israel ‒ Truth Squad would like to remind candidates running for state office just how little time they’ll spend in their jobs dealing with tensions in the Middle East. Unless Hamas is putting potholes on I-96 or ICE is causing low third-grade reading scores, there are more important issues for most Michigan voters.

Beyond the question of relevance, though, is the question of fairness. The ad strings together a 16-second video clip that Whitmer quickly walked back, and nine-year-old tweets by Gilchrist that he apologized for, into a suggestion that the Democratic ticket actually sympathizes with terrorists and wants Washington to abandon border security.

Clearly, Whitmer’s hesitant response to her interrogator was not her finest moment on the campaign trail. And it’s worth asking if her campaign fully vetted Gilchrist’s social media history. Both incidents left them open to political attack.

But it’s now less than 8 weeks before Michigan elects a new governor. And voters might be forgiven for wanting the leading candidates for this office to, at long last, flesh out their plans for improving our public schools, rebuilding our roads and bridges, ensuring our groundwater is clean and our tax bills are reasonable and well spent.

Read Bridge Magazine’s 2018 Michigan Facts & Issues Guide here

Sending out ads with ominous, shadowy photos of your opponents and painting them as terrorist-sympathizing “extremists” may win a few votes in our divisive, hate-fueled political landscape. But they do little to educate voters about the consequential choice they will confront this November. The claims are misleading.