“Diversity is indeed a strength, not a threat.” That’s a line from the Queen’s Christmas message in 2004. “I love the diversity of London — I just feel comfortable.” That’s a line from the former immigration minister Barbara Roche in 2011. “Our priority as a government must always be to keep people safe.” That’s a line from the British Home Secretary Amber Rudd in 2017.

Racial and religious enrichment

All three women are suicide-mommas promoting an insane and deadly liberalism. All of them bear some responsibility for the suicide-bombing in Manchester on 22nd May 2017. But give Barbara Roche her due: unlike the other two, she was speaking the truth. She does indeed love an atomized society, because it fulfils her deepest political ambition: “to combat anti-semitism and xenophobia in general.” Roche is Jewish and feels paranoid in a homogeneous White society. That’s why she worked so hard to open Britain’s borders to the Third World under the traitorous Tony Blair.

And if the glorious project of racial and religious enrichment goes wrong, Barbara can always seek refuge in Israel, where her Jewish identity gives her an automatic right of citizenship. But let’s suppose that Salman Abedi, the British citizen responsible for the Manchester vibrancy, had wanted to take a short holiday in Israel to soak up some sun and enjoy some of that famous Israeli courtesy and charm.

Would he have been granted a tourist visa? No, not a chance. He was on terrorist watch-lists maintained by both British and American intelligence, so we can be absolutely certain that Israel would have refused him entry. Israel would also have refused his Libyan parents entry if they’d tried to claim asylum as refugees when they escaped the Gaddafi regime. Israel’s government really does make it a “priority” “to keep people safe.”

Pop-Pixie Meets Gang-Banger (Vibrancy Ensues)

Britain’s government, by contrast, makes it a priority to follow the diaspora Jewish ideology of open borders and minority worship. Abedi’s parents were granted asylum here and Salman Abedi was born and brought up in Manchester. In liberal ideology, that made him “as British as Prime Minister May or David Beckham.” Alas, Abedi never seems to have got the memo. He was reported again and again to the authorities for his “extremist views,” but Britain’s immigration policies have ensured that the intelligence agencies have too much vibrancy to handle.

After being funded by White tax-payers on his travels around Europe and the Muslim world, Abedi dropped in at a concert by the pop-pixie Ariana Grande in Melting-Pot Manchester. He then put his funding to further use. As the crowds were leaving the Manchester Arena, he issued a short but powerful critique of their musical tastes by detonating a suicide-bomb. Twenty-two concert-goers, most of them young girls, were killed on the spot; dozens more were left with serious injuries.

Two of the dead were a married couple from Poland, Marcin and Angelika Klis, who were waiting to pick up their two daughters. They were unlucky, but they would have had no need for luck if they’d been living in Poland, which doesn’t suffer from Muslim terrorism or from Rape Jihad. Unlike the British government, the Polish government really does make it a “priority” “to keep people safe.” That’s why it rejects mass immigration from the Third World: the Polish Prime Minister Beata Szydlo links “terrorism” with “the EU’s immigration policy” and acts accordingly.

Her views are a “true disgrace.” So said the former Labour politician and convicted fraudster Denis MacShane in March 2017. A few weeks later, Szydlo’s common sense and MacShane’s slimy dishonesty have been further underlined by Salman Abedi and his suicide-bomb.

The Steyn Line

But MacShane is far from unique in his dishonesty. When the Jewish journalist Mark Steyn heard that dozens of shiksas had been killed and mutilated in Manchester, his thoughts naturally flew to the poor, persecuted Jews, who were, it appears, the very first to come under attack by fanatics like Abedi:

For a while, it was Europe’s Jews, at a Brussels museum and a Toulouse school and a Copenhagen synagogue and a Paris kosher supermarket. But Continentals are, except for political photo-ops on Holocaust Memorial Day, relatively heartless about dead Jews, and wrote off such incidents as something to do with “Israeli settlements” and “occupation” and of no broader significance. So they [the Muslim terrorists] moved on to slaughter 49 gays in a nightclub in Orlando — the biggest mound of gay corpses ever piled up in American history and the worst terror attack on American soil since 9/11. But all the usual noisy LGBTQWERTY activists fell suddenly silent, as if they’d all gone back in the closet and curled up in the fetal position. And those Democrats who felt obliged to weigh in thought it was something to do with the need for gun control… So they targeted provocative expressions of the infidel’s abominable false religion, decapitating a French priest at Mass and mowing down pedestrians at a Berlin Christmas market. But post-Christian Europe takes Christianity less seriously than its enemies do, and so that too merited little more than a shrug and a pledge to carry on. So they selected symbols of nationhood, like France’s Bastille Day, Canada’s Cenotaph, and the Mother of Parliaments in London. But taking seriously assaults on your own nation’s symbols would require you to take your nation seriously, and most western citizens are disinclined to do so. As the great universal talismanic anthem of the age has it, “Imagine there’s no countries/It’s easy if you try…” So the new Caliphate’s believers figured out that what their enemy really likes is consumerism and pop music. Hence the attacks on the Champs-Élysées and the flagship Åhléns department store in Stockholm, and the bloodbath at the Eagles of Death Metal concert in Paris and now at Ariana Grande’s “Dangerous Woman” tour. (“Dangerous Woman” Meets Dangerous Man, SteynOnline, 23rd May 2016)

Steyn’s rhetoric is flagrantly dishonest: he claims a progression in tactics that simply doesn’t exist, so that he can yet again present Jews as powerless victims. The seven murders at the “Paris kosher supermarket” and Danish synagogue happened long after hundreds of goyim were killed in Madrid in 2004 and London in 2005. They also happened after the Charlie Hebdo massacre, which was directed at anti-religious satirists, not at Jews. The “bloodbath at the Eagles of Death Metal concert” came in November 2015, well before the murder of a “French priest at Mass” in July 2016 and the truck-attack on “pedestrians at a Berlin Christmas market” in December 2016.

Muslims and other non-Whites have been murdering, raping and robbing goyim right across Europe for decades. Steyn inverts the truth, which is that Jews in Europe have suffered less than average, not more.

Nor does Steyn mention the overwhelming support given by Jews both to mass immigration by Muslims and to laws against “hate speech.” He can’t mention it, because it demolishes his lying pretence that Jews are powerless victims. Indeed, “Holocaust denial” is at the heart of a new campaign to further undermine free speech in Britain: the Guardian is deeply concerned at how people are using the internet to exchange views on forbidden topics. Hate-thinkers are spewing “Hate speech and anti-migrant posts,” rather than shutting up and accepting the Guardian’s policy of open borders for more enrichers like the Abedis.

British Passport, Libyan Heart

Not that the Guardian can’t easily win the debate, you understand. When the Mancunian singer Morrissey attempted to link the Manchester vibrancy with “immigration policy,” the Guardian demolished his hate-think with these quiet but devastating words: “the bomber named by police, Salman Abedi, was British-born and from Manchester.”

The Guardian thinks they’re devastating, that is. It’s plugging the liberal fantasy that Abedi became British simply by being born here. He didn’t, of course. Morrissey’s ancestors lived on the British Isles for thousands of years, bequeathing him the introversion and intelligence that have made him one of the greatest and most original song-writers in popular music. Abedi’s ancestors lived in distant North Africa for thousands of years, bequeathing him the clannishness and aggression that made him completely unsuitable for life in a White liberal democracy. Like “Jihadi John,” the British citizen of Iraqi origin who chopped heads for Islamic State in Syria, he looked inbred and subnormal.

And like the London terrorist Khalid Masood , Abedi was bad for Britain long before he committed mass-murder and caused a hugely expensive police operation to track his movements and confederates. He was involved in Manchester’s vibrant non-White gang-culture and one of his melanin-enriched homies is currently in jail for gang-rape. Those repeated warnings to the intelligence services about his “extremist views” came to nothing because there are simply too many non-Whites like that in Britain (, according to The Times), committing crimes, eating resources , and nursing deep hatred of Whites and White society.

And our hostile elite, having imported those non-Whites by the million, then encourage them to blame all their failures on “White racism.” Besides promising to crush free speech, the manifesto issued by the fake Conservative Party for the general election proclaims that: “If you are black, you are treated more harshly by the criminal justice system than if you are white.” This is simply a lie: just as in the United States, Blacks here go to jail more because they commit much more crime. The “criminal justice system” in Britain treats them less severely than they deserve, which is why Breitbart had this vibrant news: “Knife Crime Soars to Five-Year High After Kerb on ‘Racist’ Police Stop and Search.”

“We’re All the Same Beneath the Skin (Amen)”

Theresa May is in thrall to the same cuckservative inanity that inspired Donald Trump to hand the fake Pope “a first-edition set of [Martin Luther] King’s five books, which were custom-bound and accented with gold hand-tooling.” But cuckservatives have to acknowledge that they come second-best when it comes to destroying the West. Liberals are still number one. This was the response of the repulsive Mark Easton, the BBC’s Home Affairs editor, to the Manchester vibrancy:

In a diverse and cosmopolitan city like Manchester, strength comes through tolerance of difference and intolerance of injustice. There will always be tensions and arguments, but respecting other people’s right to see the world differently, supporting them in times of need, that is the glue that holds communities and societies together. Experience tells us that, in reacting to the agony of last night’s violence against our children, we must remain true to those values, however hard that may be. To lash out would be to play into the hands of the bomber and his accomplices. There will be voices shouting for vengeance and retribution, but strength comes from calmness and resolution. The emergency service personnel, who responded with such professionalism and selflessness, epitomise true courage when the risks are high. The efficiency of medical staff in treating and comforting the victims and their families helps vaccinate our society against the cancer of hate. Those queuing to give their blood in Manchester today, people of all backgrounds and faiths, understand that we are all the same beneath the skin. This is a time for reaching out, not hunkering down. Manchester united is the fitting response to a vicious attack on fair Manchester city. (Manchester bombing: An attack on innocence, BBC Website, 23rd May 2016)

Easton has been lying and spinning liberal propaganda for many years. Like Queen Elizabeth II, Barbara Roche and Amber Rudd, he bears some responsibility for what happened in Manchester. And for what happened in Rotherham and Oxford. And in all the other places, past, present and future, where mass immigration does its entirely predictable harm to British Whites.

Feeble schmaltz at the Guardian

And Easton can’t even get his propaganda right. People who donate blood understand precisely that we aren’t “all the same beneath the skin.” Like countless other biological variables, blood-groups differ between both individuals and races. Mixing the wrong blood-groups can lead to a painful death. That’s a good metaphor for what happened in Manchester. Mixing incompatible races and cultures has led to disaster. Everything positive about Manchester, from its world-famous authors, musicians and soccer teams to its pioneering science and technology, is owed to its White inhabitants.

Its non-Whites, by contrast, have excelled at gang violence, sex-crime and terrorism in a city they could never have created for themselves. Manchester and the suicide-bombing there are a microcosm of what the hostile elite have been doing to the West for many decades. They’ve imposed mass immigration on unwilling Whites everywhere from America and France to Australia and Italy. Abedi’s suicide-bombing is just one more entry in an ever-expanding list of death, destruction and horror.

Forty years of fighting for refugees

Liars like Mark Easton and useful idiots like Queen Elizabeth II have the blood of innocents on their hands. So does the energetic Edie Friedman, who recently celebrated “forty years of fighting for refugees” like the Abedis:

Forty years ago, the Jewish community in Britain was not overly concerned with anti-racist causes. So says Edie Friedman, the American-born psychologist who was so disturbed by British Jews’ lack of engagement that she set up the Jewish Council for Racial Equality (Jcore). She recalls coming to the decision while sitting in her bedsit in Leeds, having arrived in the UK to work as a youth organiser for Oxfam. “When I got here, I found things in the Jewish community were very different from in America. The only thing I could find on race issues was a dusty pamphlet in the Board of Deputies office. Tackling institutional racism generally and racism within the Jewish community was not on the agenda. So I set up with just myself and a typewriter.” On Monday this week, Jcore marked its 40th anniversary with a celebratory dinner in London for 140 guests. (Forty years of ﬁghting for refugees, The Jewish Chronicle, 19th May 2017 / 23rd Iyar 5777)

Meanwhile, a rare refugee in Israel describes how life “is completely difficult and hard. Super tough. You never know what you’ll do next — the government can decide at any time to put you in prison and give you a deportation order.” In Israel, the authorities “break the spirit of asylum seekers, so they will leave.”

Unlike the traitors in Britain, the elite in Israel and Poland really do make it a “priority” “to keep people safe.” That’s why Israel and Poland don’t have Libyan suicide-bombers blowing up their children.