As the self-proclaimed free speech platform, Gab has consistently struggled to maintain its own mission statement and now has begun to weigh in on sociopolitical issues in relation to how porn and only porn destroyed the Western Patriarchy. Nevermind what they qualify as the “Patriarchy” is nothing more than the 800 year old chivalry established by the Marian Cult as gynocentric worship alongside a legal structure that insulated women from consequences because of the high mortality rate civilizations faced, thus rendering their definition of “Patriarchy” as void by definition.

On Twitter Gab Trends blames pornography for the complicated decline of western civilizations relationship norms and with it subsequent stability, but then takes it a step forward by stating the supreme court was wrong. Pornography is not protected as a form of free speech anymore than flag burning is.

When you boil their argument down without getting into any of the complexities that would keep us here for days, their position is simply women only brought to the table sexual gratification so poor that a hand and a picture outperform it.

Personally I find it hilarious when these groups attempt to get reverse woke and end up being immensely sexist while refusing to acknowledge the finer parts of their arguments. Only twisting it to somehow be men’s fault because being male is inherently a sin.

As a “Capitalist” the solution would appear to be increase the value of said pussy with say exclusivity and overall quality or increase the value of women by adding additional assets beyond “plot” and vagina. Call me crazy because the left is already calling me a misogynist, but the problem thus doesn’t appear to be with men, but with women and society who need men to take care of women because women are a negative net income on society and someone needs to pay for the obligations.

It is this drive behind the “gaming addiction” label along with the various “man up” initiatives and slurs. At the end of the day one of the two groups produces a larger amount of taxable income comparably to what they extract from society. No matter how much they want to scream to the heaven about broken class ceilings thanks to quotas and women can do anything a man can do at the end of the day it’s all based upon a collective pooling of resources and only one of the two groups is primarily paying into it.

Of course Gab doesn’t see it this way, but then again they banned loli content because their own thought fictional drawings without real life age were real, so their grasp on reality is questionable to say the least.

Users that frequent gab in decreasing amounts (see chart below) aren’t buying into the muh-pornography is bad rhetoric. Instead they’ve taken to mocking the site calling them boomers. Only to be met with the devastating Coomer comeback. A retaliation so bad that at first I thought it was a reference to millennials before Urban Dictionary informed me it was a reference to porn addicts who had developer sociopathy.

What exactly is the point in insulting a sociopath? It’s not going to win you any clout with observers and the sociopath now devoid in part or entirely of emotion is going to find said attempts to be amusingly juvenile. Then again this is the same website that thought censoring images and words was a brilliant idea.