A proposed constitutional amendment to allow the medical use of marijuana will go before Florida voters in November after the state Supreme Court narrowly approved the ballot language Monday.

The 4–3 decision is a victory for Orlando personal injury lawyer John Morgan, who spent $4 million on a medical marijuana petition drive, and a defeat for Attorney General Pam Bondi, who fought to keep the question off the ballot.

The decision comes three days after Morgan secured enough voter signatures to make the ballot. He made a massive push in December and January to beat the Feb. 1 deadline instead of waiting for the Supreme Court decision -- a gamble that has now paid off.

Neither Morgan nor Bondi immediately returned messages left on their cellphones after the decision was announced.

The 74-word ballot, coming in at just under the 75-word limit on summing up a proposed amendment, reads as follows:

Allows the medical use of marijuana for individuals with debilitating diseases as determined by a licensed Florida physician. Allows caregivers to assist patients' medical use of marijuana. The Department of Health shall register and regulate centers that produce and distribute marijuana for medical purposes and shall issue identification cards to patients and caregivers. Applies only to Florida law. Does not authorize violations of federal law or any non-medical use, possession or production of marijuana.

Medical marijuana is legal in 20 states and the District of Columbia, and Colorado and Washington state allow recreational use.

Polls have shown strong support for the measure. Gov. Rick Scott last week said he plans to vote against it, but he said he would respect the voters' wishes if it is approved. The measure must receive 60 percent approval from voters. The Democrats hoping to challenge Scott -- former state Sen. Nan Rich and former Gov. Charlie Crist -- support medical marijuana.

Bondi challenged the ballot summary, saying the language was misleading and a more widespread use of marijuana would be allowed than what voters would be led to believe.



Gov. Rick Scott said Tuesday he will vote against it.



I’m not in favor of marijuana. I think illegal drug use is not right. I’ve seen how it’s impacted families, the same as how alcoholism has impacted families. I’m going to be voting against it but look the voters are going to decide. It’s going to be on the ballot and I’ll be voting against it."

Local reaction

Floridians sounded off on the ruling Monday night.



"I think it definitely has it's pros and cons," said Nicola Savona of Clearwater. "I think that for a certain group of people it is beneficial. I would just hate to see people abuse that."



"We have to figure out whose legally allowed to have it," said Sonia Savona of Clearwater questioning how it could be regulated. "How do we go ahead and make sure people aren't abusing and taking advantage and putting other people in danger?"



While the non-profit organization, Save our Society from Drugs, called it, “…extremely unfortunate….and not in the best interest of Floridians.’ It went on to say the amendment is “…extremely flawed and wide open to significant abuse.”

———————————————

How Florida's justices voted

Approved: Justices Barbara Pariente, Fred Lewis, Peggy Quince and James Perry said the ballot language was clear.

"The proposed amendment has a logical and natural oneness of purpose -- namely, whether Floridians want a provision in the state constitution authorizing the medical use of marijuana, as determined by a licensed Florida physician," they wrote. "The ballot title and summary fairly inform voters of the chief purpose of the amendment and will not mislead voters, who will be able to cast an intelligent and informed ballot."

Disapproved: Justices Ricky Polston, Charles Canady and Jorge Labarga dissented.

"Placing this initiative's title and summary on the ballot will result in Floridians voting on a constitutional amendment in disguise," Polston wrote. He took issue with the ballot summary saying medical marijuana would be allowed for patients with debilitating diseases, but the amendment also allows the use for patients with debilitating conditions, which might not be a disease.



Associated Press writer Gary Fineout contributed to this report.

———————————————

Reaction to the decision

Charlie Crist, former governor and current Democratic gubernatorial candidate