Yup I second that, they will never put it in order, it wouldnt matter anyway, how are they gona get those type published? When its time to combine it on a book there are rules, it must be reviewed first, these phoney wiki, forum, blog and web sites from fans and non-experts arent in any published science journals of the 20th century, when it would be time to examine their phoney list in a college scene, the professor would in just 10 minutes reading the whole abstract will throw out 90% of the books because they all mention the details of the exact same accounts, martial, and jamrachs incident.Yet the list we got there of lions winning has some with even the photo of the lion or tiger and a photo of the person making the claim the tigers were killed, like beatty, hoover, ect. None of the people saying a tiger killed a lion has any credence of empirical evidence or tangible proof, they just copy other books and then twist the storys to their own views. The wild fact members are just the same ones who were once on yuku, they are all jokes, the only one who ever did any research was peter, and he exposed himself when he wrote like a thousand pages trying to demonize beatty, peter is no different, he acts as if he doesnt debate it, hes debated it on yuku and carnivora. Now we know most of beatty, so his rants are nulled. Beatty lost over 55 tigers to lions, and only less than 4 lions to tigers. This is consistent with all the rest of the records, the lion almost always wins.Guate is a joke, he and pckts pump in this idea that tigers are twice the sizes of lions, yet I showed lions can have 1 to even 2 feet of height over the average tiger, even the biggest tiger in the world would be shorter than a regular tall lion.. 80% of the tiger population is only in the 300 lb range. While there are now the crap lode of sites showing lions are typical at 280 kg as even sub adults, with several wild lions in the 800-900 pound probability:I already showed in the other thread that guate, pckts and peter them fake countless of sources, faking them.........faking...them, you lose 100% credibility when you have to actually make up a phoney article you yourself created. This shows two things:1.) You never had any confidence in the tiger against the lion.2.) You are butt hurt and already conceded the lion wins by faking it because you couldnt, cant and most likely know you will never match the list of lions winning.Let them edit there list in and mix in a 1,000 more times, and say you have a list of 1,000+ times the tiger has killed the lion...won't mean shit. We've already analyzed all the sources of tigers winning, and it doesnt even get pass 20 individually, majority of them are female lions being killed, and most of them werent even fair against the lionesses, vartys lioness was drugged, huerta was 2 years old, the indian lioness was sleeping ect. As for males, there isnt even 5 male lions killed, and unlike ours, doesnt have a single modern account with a photo of the person making the claim, or a photo of the winner or loser lion/tiger. Them saying neither is superior is a cop out of living in denial, not even knowing the definition of superior, its a fact that in heraldry and combat the lion is without a doubt the superior.