They are the new public enemy No. 1.

No, I'm not talking about plastic straws.

Or smokers who are afraid they may soon not be allowed to have a puff in their own home.

Smokers are the old public enemy No. 1.

The new public enemy No. 1 is the e-scooter.

Not only have e-scooters sent people to hospital (and I don't mean transporting them there), but they also have batteries that can catch fire and barbecue your home.

Hence, all the new safety regulations.

Then last week, I saw a comment on Facebook that offended me so much that it was all I could do not to make a police report.

Someone was commenting on a Straits Times video about the new law reducing the e-scooter speed limit from 15kmh to 10kmh on footpaths.

The comment was: "I see people jogging at more than 10kmh at times. Can we restrict their jogging speed as well? Will be dangerous if they knock into people. Maybe we can have them wear helmets?"

What the what?

As a runner (not the loanshark kind), I was triggered.

In the first place, if your speed is more than 10kmh, you're no longer "jogging".

You're running, baby.

And you know why there are no laws restricting "jogging speed"?

Because a runner didn't collide with a 45-year-old woman in Bedok Reservoir Road in March, leaving her with severe head injuries.

Because a runner didn't collide with a 56-year-old woman in Yishun nine days later, leaving her with a lower lip laceration, chest wall strain and skin abrasions.

Because a runner didn't collide with a five-year-old girl outside Sembawang MRT station in May, leaving her with abrasions on her limbs and a bruise on her forehead.

Because a runner didn't collide with a nine-year-old boy in Clementi in July last year, leaving him with abrasions on his right elbow, wrist and left knee.

Because a runner didn't collide with a 61-year-old woman in a Yishun hawker centre last October, knocking her unconscious.

Because a runner didn't collide with a 55-year-old woman at a Pasir Ris bus stop last September, leaving her with severe brain injuries and in a month-long coma.

You know who did all that colliding and injuring?

The people who won't be allowed to go over 10kmh on footpaths next year.

Some e-scooter riders have complained that at that speed, they might as well walk.

You know what? That's not a bad idea.

EXERCISE

Walking is good exercise and you have less chance of burning down your home or knocking someone unconscious. It's cheaper too. Practically free.

And if you can walk 10km in one hour or even 5km in half an hour, hats off to you, although technically speaking, you're not walking but running, as I've established earlier.

But if you can't pass your IPPT, even 2.4km in 15 minutes will be hard. You might as well ride an e-scooter even with the new speed limit.

E-scooter fans should be grateful that their favourite two-wheel hazard hasn't been banned outright - yet.

An online petition started by a Mr Rodney Tan called "It Is Time to Ban E-Scooter in Singapore" has already surpassed its goal of 1,000 signatures.

Mr Tan wrote in his petition: "I have seen, and can safely say many others too, that these e-scooterists would utilise both pedestrians walkpaths and road meant for vehicles, whenever they feel it was convenient.

"As a motorist, I really do not know what to expect of them in terms of road practices.

"As it is, LTA is short of manpower to police irresponsible cyclists who had caused so many accidents to pedestrians."

Oooh, and he managed to throw in a little shade at cyclists too, just to let them know that even though e-scooter riders have overtaken cyclists as the No. 1 road nuisance, they haven't been forgotten, although losing their deposit to oBike should be punishment enough.

Instead of a ban that Mr Tan wants, the Government seems to be making it as onerous as possible to ride an e-scooter.

We can see how effective that strategy has been with smokers. Old habits die hard.

Now please excuse me while I jog at less than 10kmh to Kopitiam to get a straw for my KFC drink.