Formatting may be lacking as a result. If this article is un-readable please report it so that we may fix it.

Posted on May 15, 2013, Ian Miles Cheong Nintendo Flexing Copyright Clout on YouTube Let’s Play Channels

Reporting by Mitchell Saltzman (@gamefrontmitch), Ian Cheong (@stillgray) and Mark Burnham (@MarkBurnham)

Nintendo is reportedly issuing “content ID match” claims on Let’s Play videos featuring their game franchises, according to prolific YouTuber Zack Scott, who is currently playing Luigi’s Mansion: Dark Moon.

Scott noted that Nintendo made content ID matches against a number of his videos, thus preventing him from monetizing those videos on YouTube.

In a Facebook post, Scott wrote the following message as an open letter to Nintendo:

I just want to express my feelings on the matter of Nintendo claiming not just my YouTube videos, but from several LPers as well. I’m a Nintendo fan. I waited in the cold overnight to get a Wii. I’m a 3DS ambassador. I got a Wii U at midnight when I already had one in the mail. I’ve been a Nintendo fan since the NES, and I’ve owned all of their systems. With that said, I think filing claims against LPers is backwards. Video games aren’t like movies or TV. Each play-through is a unique audiovisual experience. When I see a film that someone else is also watching, I don’t need to see it again. When I see a game that someone else is playing, I want to play that game for myself! Sure, there may be some people who watch games rather than play them, but are those people even gamers? My viewers watch my gameplay videos for three main reasons:

1. To hear my commentary/review.

2. To learn about the game and how to play certain parts.

3. To see how I handle and react to certain parts of the game. Since I started my gaming channel, I’ve played a lot of games. I love Nintendo, so I’ve included their games in my line-up. But until their claims are straightened out, I won’t be playing their games. I won’t because it jeopardizes my channel’s copyright standing and the livelihood of all LPers.

So, What the Hell are Content ID Matches, Anyway?

Note that content ID matches are different from ‘copyright strikes,’ which YouTube issues a channel after processing a verified request for the full removal of a video by the copyright owner. If a channel receives “three strikes,” YouTube suspends the channel and deletes all of its videos.

Content ID matches are less severe. When a publisher issues a content ID match against a video, it allows them to monetize that video with in-video ads, block it in certain countries, or even block it from playing worldwide. If a video is blocked worldwide as a result of a content ID match, the associated channel can lose its “good standing,” and as as result lose access to certain YouTube features.

Based on Nintendo’s statement to Game Front (below), it would appear they are not opting to block videos from playing outright, but rather monetize videos over a certain length with their own ads.

Widespread Complaints

Scott is not alone in his complaints, which have since been echoed by a number of other YouTubers, as well as Thomas Was Alone creator Mike Bithell.

Thomas – youtubers = flop. — Mike Bithell (@mikeBithell) May 15, 2013

It’s safe to say I’ll never try Nintendo games in the near future. The content ID claims will shake up a lot of big Nintendo LP channels. — theRadBrad (@thaRadBrad) May 15, 2013

GG Nintendo Nice stunt you are pulling there hope it doesnt bite you in the ass!I feel bad for nintendo mainly content producers out there — SlyFoxHound (@SlyFoxHound) May 15, 2013

Nintendo are goddamn fools if they believe going after YT’ers w/ ID claims that put up gameplay from their games will benefit them AT ALL. — Max Gonzalez (@GassyMexican) May 15, 2013

Wow, ridiculous move by Nintendo going after YT content makers by hitting them with content ID claims. Foolish — James (@UberHaxorNova) May 15, 2013

Hearing a lot of rumblings that Nintendo is content-ID matching gameplay videos of their titles on YouTube. Dick fuckin’ move. — Ryan Letourneau (@NorthernlionLP) May 15, 2013

We’ve since reached out to Nintendo for comment, to which they have responded that they are currently looking into the situation and will update us as soon as possible. More as we have it.

Update: Nintendo issued Game Front the following statement: