No, not here. Over on the reddit textblade subforum. It’s cool because it confirms so much of that I’ve been saying.

You’ve seen the many posts here about how terrible the banning supposedly is - though usually it isn’t actual banning but just reduction in how often they can post.

Well, it took exactly two posts I made before I was banned! And arguably it would only have taken one. I just made two in a row before they reacted.

The next day, I found I couldn’t make a reply to anything. Since I was new to reddit, I thought maybe I wasn’t doing things right (well, actually I figured the snowflakes wanted to keep their little safe zone, but I gave them the benefit of the doubt until I had better facts - you know, what they DON’T do with WT).

So I sent a message asking the moderator and he told me I was banned. I’ll get to the details in a moment, but first let me make a general observation that there are a bunch of posts over there which include comments - negative, of course - about me. In fact, in just the first 8, rather short, threads I checked, there are at least 6 comments about me before I was even there!

So, lets go to the response I got from the “moderator” - who, surprise, was one of those who also took a shot at me:

Your two comments were not related to the topic of this subreddit and soon intended to get a rise from others, which is something I would rather not see in this subreddit.

Two reasons given, right? Well, as to the first, my 2 posts were in direct response, item by item, to a new thread which was almost entirely about me! So if my responses are not related to the topic of the subreddit then, by definition, neither was the person who made the original post. Pretty sure they aren’t banned.

So their excuse doesn’t work. Let’s look at the second - that I was trying to get a rise out of people. Well, I only posted there because one might say they got a rise out of me, talking about me! So why haven’t all those who attacked me banned?

Seems that excuse doesn’t hold up well either. BTW, here is a small portion - the first part and last part about me - that I was responding to, just so you can see how pathetic they are:

But that’s nothing compared to Dummy #1, aka DBK:

…

liar, blowhard, boob == that’s you, but what am I?

In between was a series of misleading and downright false statements about things I’ve said. I methodically was going through them showing how they were wrong. So 1585 characters were about me.

Conclusion: Just as I said before. They want their “safe space”, they don’t want different views. It’s funny to read over there about how this forum is all one-sided even though anyone can see it is not, yet over there, at least the threads I’ve read so far, are overwhelming holding to one view. I only recall seeing ONE post so far from someone not spouting the same kind of stuff against WT.

So now you know what you get from their definition of "advanced citizenship