Republicans on Capitol Hill have a unified message for President Trump: Don’t fire Robert Mueller.

A close friend of Trump, Chris Ruddy, said in separate interviews Monday and Tuesday that the president is considering terminating Mueller, the special counsel leading the FBI’s investigation into possible ties between the Trump campaign and the Russian government.

But congressional GOP leaders are urging Trump to allow Mueller to conduct his probe without White House interference so the president can be “vindicated.”

And some rank-and-file Republicans said ousting Mueller one month after Trump fired then-FBI Director James Comey would appear to be a case of obstruction of justice and could risk the entire Trump presidency.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I think it’s a form of political suicide. If you fire one guy, then you fire another, all of a sudden it begins to look like you’re trying to hide something, look like you have a reason to want the investigations to go away,” Rep. Mark Sanford (R-S.C.), who has criticized Trump at times, told The Hill on Tuesday.

“It doesn’t pass the smell test. ... I think people would go nuts,” Sanford added.

Mueller, himself a former FBI director, has built a sterling reputation in Washington as a serious, straight-shooting investigator who works above the political fray. Indeed, before he was tapped as the special counsel in the Russia probe, Mueller was reportedly on Trump’s shortlist to replace Comey atop the FBI.

In his new role, however, Mueller has quickly become the target of some Republicans, who are suddenly questioning his credibility because of his close relationship with Comey and the team he is assembling.

Former Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) this week raised questions about the fairness and impartiality of the Mueller-led investigation. Gingrich said it’s “time to rethink” Mueller’s role given that at least four members of Mueller’s team have donated to Democratic presidential campaigns and groups.

The top two GOP leaders on Capitol Hill — Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell Addison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellTrump 'no longer angry' at Romney because of Supreme Court stance On The Money: Anxious Democrats push for vote on COVID-19 aid | Pelosi, Mnuchin ready to restart talks | Weekly jobless claims increase | Senate treads close to shutdown deadline The Hill's Campaign Report: Trump faces backlash after not committing to peaceful transition of power MORE (R-Ky.) and Speaker Paul Ryan Paul Davis RyanKenosha will be a good bellwether in 2020 At indoor rally, Pence says election runs through Wisconsin Juan Williams: Breaking down the debates MORE (R-Wis.) — wouldn’t comment on Mueller’s team but praised Mueller himself.

“I have a lot of confidence in Bob Mueller. I think it was a good choice,” McConnell told reporters.

At a news conference Tuesday, Ryan grew frustrated at having to answer so many questions about what he called media-generated “rumors” that Mueller could soon be ousted. But the Speaker made clear he believed Trump should not interfere with the FBI probe.

“I think the best thing to do is to let Robert Mueller do his job. I think the best vindication for the president is to let this investigation go on independent and thoroughly,” Ryan said. “That to me is the smartest thing to do, the best thing to do, hopefully it will happen.”

Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn John CornynQuinnipiac polls show Trump leading Biden in Texas, deadlocked race in Ohio The Hill's Campaign Report: GOP set to ask SCOTUS to limit mail-in voting Liberal super PAC launches ads targeting vulnerable GOP senators over SCOTUS fight MORE (R-Texas), a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee who launched a separate Russia investigation, was asked if he has seen anything that might warrant Trump firing Mueller. “I've seen no reason for that,” Cornyn told reporters.

Asked if he trusts Mueller to run the FBI investigation, Cornyn replied: “I do.”

Democratic leaders are thrilled to have Mueller conducting the Department of Justice probe and are eagerly awaiting the conclusions. But some rank-and-file members have escalated their calls for ousting Trump, and Rep. Brad Sherman (D-Calif.) on Monday introduced an article of impeachment accusing the president of obstructing justice in the act of firing Comey.

Sherman, at the moment, is the lone lawmaker to endorse that proposal. But other Democrats, who are highly critical of Trump, said the surest way to get them on board would be the termination of Mueller.

“I dare him to do it,” said Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), perhaps Trump’s most vocal detractor on Capitol Hill.

“If he fires Mueller, he’s going to upset this country in a way that he, perhaps, does not understand,” she added. “He has already gone much too far, created much too much distrust, and this would be the straw that breaks the camel’s back.”

Rep. Al Green Alexander (Al) N. GreenThe Memo: Trump's race tactics fall flat Trump administration ending support for 7 Texas testing sites as coronavirus cases spike The Hill's Coronavirus Report: Miami mayor worries about suicide and domestic violence rise; Trump-governor debate intensifies MORE (D-Texas), who is eying his own articles of impeachment, sounded a similar alarm this week, saying any move by Trump to curtail Mueller’s task would “validate the reasons why he should be impeached” and lead Green to force a floor vote on ousting Trump.

Even some of Trump’s closest GOP allies on the Hill say it’d be unwise to remove Mueller in such a public fashion, though they don’t think the investigation itself has much merit.

“Politically, I think it’s difficult for the president to fire him, but I don’t know what the heck the guy is going to do. There is no purpose any longer unless he is going to find out more about Susan Rice unmasking issues and potential obstruction from [former Attorney General] Loretta Lynch,” Rep. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.) told The Hill.

“The fact that Russia tried to influence our election, that’s barely news. They’ve been doing that for years and decades,” Cramer continued. “To spend a bunch of people’s money and anxiety for a media-frenzy soap opera is not a great idea.”

Rep. Scott DesJarlais (R-Tenn.), another Trump defender and member of the Oversight Committee, called the possibility of collusion between the Trump campaign officials and the Russians “a farce.”

“I don’t think there is any evidence of obstruction of justice. Trump is guilty of being Trump in the way that he talks,” DesJarlais said, downplaying Comey’s testimony last week that he felt the president was directing him to halt his FBI probe into Trump campaign adviser Michael Flynn’s undisclosed contact with the Russians.

Rep. Robert Aderholt Robert Brown AderholtLobbying world The Hill's Coronavirus Report: WHO vs. Trump; Bernie's out Bottom line MORE (R-Ala.), who advised candidate Trump on agriculture issues, said axing Mueller now would be “too premature.” But he said things could change if more evidence comes out that Mueller is simply on a “witch hunt.”

Aderholt shared Gingrich’s concerns that some of Mueller’s team had contributed in the past to Democrats, including Trump’s 2016 rival Hillary Clinton Hillary Diane Rodham ClintonFox News poll: Biden ahead of Trump in Nevada, Pennsylvania and Ohio Trump, Biden court Black business owners in final election sprint The power of incumbency: How Trump is using the Oval Office to win reelection MORE.

“Clearly, some of the attorneys that he picked are clearly in the Clinton camp. I’m not sure he should have done that,” Aderholt said in an interview just off the House floor. “When you see someone who’s been in the Clinton camp who were big donors to Clinton who are going to be doing the investigation … I would look for somebody who was maybe — that was out of the political scene.”

Cristina Marcos and Jordain Carney contributed.