Leaked Documents Reveal Democrats' Plans to Control Social Media

Dems plot to control tech platforms on the internet is exposed in memo

© press Democrats are planning to take control of social media and big internet platforms

A leaked memo has exposed plans by the Democratic Party to take control of the Internet's leading tech platforms.

The documents, that were circulating between senior Dems reveal a plot to push for strict government regulations, placing leading social media networks such as Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter under full control of the Democrats.

By regulating other major web companies such as Google and Apple, the Internet would come under the Democrats' authoritarian rule, allowing them to ban conservatives, independent media outlets, and anybody who doesn’t toe the party line.

The draft policy paper, titled “Potential Policy Proposals for Regulation of Social Media and Technology Firms,” – penned by Sen. Mark Warner and leaked by an anonymous source to Axios – details how the Democrat party, working with liberal Silicon Valley, can regulate the Internet according to their own set of arbitrary standards.

© press Democrats will work with liberal Silicon Valley to regulate the Internet

Reason reports: The paper starts out by noting that Russians have long spread disinformation, including when “the Soviets tried to spread ‘fake news’ denigrating Martin Luther King” (here he fails to mention that the Americans in charge at the time did the same). But NOW IT’S DIFFERENT, because technology.

“Today’s tools seem almost built for Russian disinformation techniques,” Warner opines. And the ones to come, he assures us, will be even worse.

Here’s how Warner is suggesting we deal:

Mandatory location verification. The paper suggests forcing social media platforms to authenticate and disclose the geographic origin of all user accounts or posts.

Mandatory identity verification: The paper suggests forcing social media and tech platforms to authenticate user identities and only allow “authentic” accounts (“inauthentic accounts not only pose threats to our democratic process…but undermine the integrity of digital markets”), with “failure to appropriately address inauthentic account activity” punishable as “a violation of both SEC disclosure rules and/or Section 5 of the [Federal Trade Commission] Act.”

Bot labeling: Warner’s paper suggests forcing companies to somehow label bots or be penalized (no word from Warner on how this is remotely feasible)

Define popular tech as “essential facilities.” These would be subject to all sorts of heightened rules and controls, says the paper, offering Google Maps as an example of the kinds of apps or platforms that might count. “The law would not mandate that a dominant provider offer the service for free,” writes Warner. “Rather, it would be required to offer it on reasonable and non-discriminatory terms” provided by the government.

Other proposals include more disclosure requirements for online political speech, more spending to counter supposed cybersecurity threats, more funding for the Federal Trade Commission, a requirement that companies’ algorithms can be audited by the feds (and this data shared with universities and others), and a requirement of “interoperability between dominant platforms.”

The paper also suggests making it a rule that tech platforms above a certain size must turn over internal data and processes to “independent public interest researchers” so they can identify potential “public health/addiction effects, anticompetitive behavior, radicalization,” scams, “user propagated misinformation,” and harassment—data that could be used to “inform actions by regulators or Congress.”

And—of course— these include further revisions to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, recently amended by Congress to exclude protections for prostitution-related content.

A revision to Section 230 could provide the ability for users to demand takedowns of certain sorts of content and hold platforms liable if they don’t abide, it says, while admitting that “attempting to distinguish between true disinformation and legitimate satire could prove difficult.”

“The proposals in the paper are wide-ranging and in some cases even politically impossible, and raise almost as many questions as they try to answer,” suggested Mathew Ingram, putting it very mildly at the Columbia Journalism Review.

Total newsroom employment in the US is down 23 percent from 2008 to 2017, from 114,000 newsroom staffers to 88,000. https://t.co/wIKCt6IQqf — Jay Rosen (@jayrosen_nyu) July 31, 2018

.@foxandfriends playing a clip of Limbaugh this morning egging on Trump's threat to shut down the government over wall funding: "Trump is showing he is not afraid of a government shutdown which, believe me, the base of this party loves... The Republican base is Trump's now." https://t.co/QOW6FKGq46 — Alex Mallin (@alex_mallin) July 31, 2018

© press Democrats plan to take control of leading social media platforms

FREE MARKETS

Telemedicine abortion test sanctioned by FDA. “A nonprofit group is testing whether it’s safe to let women take abortion pills in their own homes after taking screening tests and consulting with a doctor on their phones or computers,” notes Politico.

The group, called Gynuity Health Projects, is carrying out the trial in five states that already allow virtual doctors to oversee administration of the abortion pill, and may expand to others. If the trial proves that allowing women to take the pill at home is safe—under a virtual doctor’s supervision—the group hopes the FDA could eventually loosen restrictions to allow women to take pills mailed to them after the consult.

If FDA took that step, it could even help women in states with restrictive abortion laws get around them, potentially blurring the strict boundaries between abortion laws in different states if—as is likely—the Senate confirms a high court justice who is open to further limits on Roe.

Meanwhile, a rapidly increasing number of state attorneys general are suing over whether its safe to let people print guns in their own homes after the group Defense Distributed posting of 3D-printed gun plans online.

QUICK HITS