



Kyrie Irving is one of the best point guards in the NBA today and has provided the Cleveland Cavaliers with a star young player after the departure of one relatively renowned superstar. Kyrie's ability to perform in the clutch has already earned recognition along with some of the best in the game (ala Kobe Bryant and Kevin Durant). And remarkably, like that former Cavs superstar, everybody knows it’s going to come down to Irving in the final minutes of the game because the second and third highest scorers on the team are the oh-so-formidable Dion Waiters and Tristan Thompson at 14.6 and 11.4 points per game.





While Irving is doing so great—and set a high standard for incoming rookie point guards—often Damian Lillard of the Portland Trailblazers is set aside as a decent up-and-coming player. Let there be no question: Irving is better than Lillard right now by a considerable margin, but a comparison of their rookie years sheds some light into a more equitable comparison. Lillard has considerably similar potential to Kyrie.





Both are the new-brand of scoring point guards who can take over a game. Need an example? In a 136-106 win on Friday, the Trailblazers beat the team with the best record in the NBA handily (San Antonio). Lillard went off for 35 points and 9 assists, going 12-20 from the field, 3-4 from three, and 8-8 from the line. That’s big time from the sure-fire 2013 NBA Rookie of the Year





in the NBA last year. Better than those very LeBrons, Kobes, and Durants, you name it…and this year has been no different. Why is this a problem? Lillard’s recognition as a big-time player is diminished by that prowess. While Cleveland has a minimal spotlight, the remnants of LeBron’s past give Kyrie some (deserved) love. On the other hand, the lowly Trailblazers have a reputation for passing up on Michael Jordan and Kevin Durant—that’s about it. Everything about Irving’s late-game heroics has already been well-documented. An ESPN Insider article showed that the rookie Irving was hands down the best clutch playerlast year. Better than those very LeBrons, Kobes, and Durants, you name it…and this year has been no different. Why is this a problem? Lillard’s recognition as a big-time player is diminished by that prowess. While Cleveland has a minimal spotlight, the remnants of LeBron’s past give Kyrie some (deserved) love. On the other hand, the lowly Trailblazers have a reputation for passing up on Michael Jordan and Kevin Durant—that’s about it.





Moreover, a direct comparison of these guys shows that, in fact, they have remarkably similar rookie years.







Kyrie Irving Damian Lillard Points 18.5 18.8 Rebounds 3.7 3.2 Assists 5.4 6.4 Steals 1.1 1.0 Games played 51 61 eFG percentage .518 .497 FT percentage .872 .859



Across the board, the numbers are really comparable. Yet Lillard is not getting as much hype because of this encore of a Round 2 by Kyrie Irving. The plethora of great point guards in the NBA also has put Lillard at a slight disadvantage but I fully expect him to compete with Irving for the top point guard spot once the Chris Paul and Rajon Rondo era has ended…and maybe even before then. Across the board, the numbers are really comparable. Yet Lillard is not getting as much hype because of this encore of a Round 2 by Kyrie Irving. The plethora of great point guards in the NBA also has put Lillard at a slight disadvantage but I fully expect him to compete with Irving for the top point guard spot once the Chris Paul and Rajon Rondo era has ended…and maybe even before then.





. However, it is important to keep in mind that the Blazers are in the Western conference and the Cavs in the East. Thus far the Blazers are 29-32 and fighting for a playoff spot against the 10th lowest SRS (essentially strength of schedule) whereas the 2011-12 Cavaliers had the second worst SRS and finished with an abysmal 21-45 record. In other words, they played terribly against terrible teams Lillard has had significantly better team success than Irving which is is in large part because the Blazers also have Batum, Aldridge. By contrast, Irving’s supporting cast is not nearly as capableit is important to keep in mind that the Blazers are in the Western conference and the Cavs in the East. Thus far the Blazers are 29-32 and fighting for a playoff spot against the 10th lowest SRS (essentially strength of schedule) whereas the 2011-12 Cavaliers had theSRS and finished with an abysmal 21-45 record. In other words, they played terribly against terrible teams —not impressive. —not impressive.





Imagine these guys on the same team... What does this mean? Simply that with more around him, Lillard has been able to compete for a playoff spot in the Western conference. With less and against worse competition, Irving has had minimal team success. Irving is in a more difficult situation and performed stunningly considering he was a teenager taking over the reins of the most famous teenage NBA superstar, What does this mean? Simply that with more around him, Lillard has been able to compete for a playoff spot in the Western conference. With less and against worse competition, Irving has had minimal team success. Irving is in a more difficult situation and performed stunningly considering he was a teenager taking over the reins of the most famous teenage NBA superstar, LeBron James . So which factors you weigh more is personal preference but the reality is that Lillard is not significantly worse than Kyrie by any stretch of the imagination.





more during clutch time whereas the Cavs scored 11 points less when Irving was on the floor last year. Irving may be worth more as an individual but his team did better when he was on the bench during clutch time (according to these numbers). The exact opposite can be said of Lillard. This does not help Kyrie's case because (these numbers say that) his team was better off with him on the bench at the end of the fourth. How about clutch stats? While Irving has an impressive edge in points per 48 minutes and eFG%, the other numbers tell a different story. When Lillard is on the floor, his team scores 15 pointsduring clutch time whereas the Cavs scored 11 pointswhen Irving was on the floor last year. Irving may be worth more as an individual but his team did better when he was on the bench during clutch time (according to these numbers). The exact opposite can be said of Lillard. This does not help Kyrie's case because (these numbers say that) his team was better off with him on the bench at the end of the fourth.







Net pts per 48 min eFG% Win% Pts per 48 min FT% D. Lillard +15.6 .500 54.5 27.5 77.8 K. Irving -11.7 .579 37.5 53.8 83.9





The most important conclusion that we should get from this is that the two are incredibly similar in their ability. Right now—and in general—it may be hard to imagine that Lillard will become a better player than Irving but a critical look the numbers shows that Lillard is not far behind…if he is behind at all in the first place. He’s on our radar but Lillard should not be considered far off from the spotlight. Maybe it will take time for small market PG to gain recognition but at least you can now officially chalk me up as saying that Damian Lillard is the real deal.