IMJim



Offline



Activity: 1218

Merit: 1000







LegendaryActivity: 1218Merit: 1000 Re: SummerCoinV2 Foundation - *SUM2 Fund* July 02, 2014, 10:54:32 PM #86 Quote from: soopy452000 on July 02, 2014, 05:38:27 PM



Thank you for standing up for me and aligning with the truth.

He owes me an apology and I will unlock with a new update mate.Thank you for standing up for me and aligning with the truth.

I would say he owes you more than just an apology!! He owes 2 great communities an HUGE apology as well, BitcoinTalk owes it's users a ban from this jerk! I can't believe they allow such disruptive behavior, especially towards a devoted and honest dev with the following you have. I wish more people would take 2 seconds to lodge a complaint about this guy. Maybe everyone else is in the know or something and know it will do no good........but I at least tried now a couple times to bring their attention to this clown.



Thanks soopy......much appreciate your efforts brother! I would say he owes you more than just an apology!! He owes 2 great communities an HUGE apology as well, BitcoinTalk owes it's users a ban from this jerk! I can't believe they allow such disruptive behavior, especially towards a devoted and honest dev with the following you have. I wish more people would take 2 seconds to lodge a complaint about this guy. Maybe everyone else is in the know or something and know it will do no good........but I at least tried now a couple times to bring their attention to this clown.Thanks soopy......much appreciate your efforts brother!

Remy_5



Offline



Activity: 1195

Merit: 502







Hero MemberActivity: 1195Merit: 502 Re: SummerCoinV2 Foundation - *SUM2 Fund* July 03, 2014, 08:58:17 AM #88 Quote from: blackened515 on July 01, 2014, 12:34:08 PM Quote from: Remy_5 on July 01, 2014, 11:55:55 AM

Another point, secondary, as many know NAV in the financial field stands for Net Asset Value.

IMHO use NAV to identify this coin, I think it can be a suicide, would create confusion.





BTC - Buissnes Travel Club

DRK - Deutsches Rotes Kreuz

BC - British Columbia

VRC - Virtual Radar Client

VTC - Video Tele-Conference



Want some more confused names?

BTC - Buissnes Travel ClubDRK - Deutsches Rotes KreuzBC - British ColumbiaVRC - Virtual Radar ClientVTC - Video Tele-ConferenceWant some more confused names?

LOL No, thank you.

It would be like shooting to the Red Cross.



The fact that I referred to is that most of the examples cited is referring to things and activities

in other fields, while in the case of NAV is practically the same field.



But as I said this was just a minor point, the least important.



(Sorry for the late response)

LOL No, thank you.It would be like shooting to the Red Cross.The fact that I referred to is that most of the examples cited is referring to things and activitiesin other fields, while in the case of NAV is practically the same field.But as I said this was just a minor point, the least important.(Sorry for the late response)

Remy_5



Offline



Activity: 1195

Merit: 502







Hero MemberActivity: 1195Merit: 502 Re: SummerCoinV2 Foundation - *SUM2 Fund* July 03, 2014, 09:14:08 AM

Last edit: July 03, 2014, 10:22:04 AM by Remy_5 #89 Quote from: GREEDYJOHN on July 01, 2014, 11:55:02 PM

WE NEED TO JUST GET ON WITH THINGS AND STOP ALL THIS NAME CONFUSION. We should just smash through things, if you expect perfection or satisfy everybody's complaint, we will go nowhere.



We need to move on and forget the critics.





IMHO, a better approach would be:

We need to evaluate every critics and move on.



But it's just the way I see it.



Of course, not all ideas and critics are reasonable or practicable,

but if we limit ourselves to ignore and forget all the critics, I think,

we could fall into mistakes that others have seen, or make our project

very mediocre.

(Besides creating disaffection in the group)



I repeat, this is' just the way I see things, and applicable in any field.





Apart from that, about the main point of the question that I had done, it

seems that there has been no response. So it must be a No.



I think it's a pity, if it was handled really well from the beginning, it could

become an opportunity.



In any case, a man warned is half saved...

and his scalp too.

IMHO, a better approach would be:We need to evaluate every critics and move on.But it's just the way I see it.Of course, not all ideas and critics are reasonable or practicable,but if we limit ourselves to ignore and forget all the critics, I think,we could fall into mistakes that others have seen, or make our projectvery mediocre.(Besides creating disaffection in the group)I repeat, this is' just the way I see things, and applicable in any field.Apart from that, about the main point of the question that I had done, itseems that there has been no response. So it must be a No.I think it's a pity, if it was handled really well from the beginning, it couldbecome an opportunity.In any case, a man warned is half saved...and his scalp too.

SUM2dev



Offline



Activity: 356

Merit: 251





Official account of NAV Development Team







Sr. MemberActivity: 356Merit: 251Official account of NAV Development Team Re: SummerCoinV2 Foundation - *SUM2 Fund* July 03, 2014, 12:29:16 PM

Last edit: July 03, 2014, 01:42:34 PM by SUM2dev #90 First look into Navajo



You can see here the first screenshots of the new Navajo client. We will give the Community more updates in incoming days, including the Anonymous Technology.

You can expect more sneak peeks every 2 days.

Stay tuned!



















You can see here the first screenshots of the new Navajo client. We will give the Community more updates in incoming days, including the Anonymous Technology.You can expect more sneak peeks every 2 days.Stay tuned! Ⓝ Official account of NAV Coin [NAV] Development Team Ⓝ Visit the Thread!

SUM2dev



Offline



Activity: 356

Merit: 251





Official account of NAV Development Team







Sr. MemberActivity: 356Merit: 251Official account of NAV Development Team Re: SummerCoinV2 Foundation - *SUM2 Fund* July 03, 2014, 10:34:59 PM

Last edit: July 03, 2014, 11:03:49 PM by SUM2dev #95 Donation Wallet status - update:



0.2 BTC from the BTC donation wallet was sent as an advance to the official Navajo Coin website coder.

We will inform the community about all donation wallets transactions

0.2 BTC from the BTC donation wallet was sent as an advance to the official Navajo Coin website coder.We will inform the community about all donation wallets transactions Ⓝ Official account of NAV Coin [NAV] Development Team Ⓝ Visit the Thread!

Remy_5



Offline



Activity: 1195

Merit: 502







Hero MemberActivity: 1195Merit: 502 Re: SummerCoinV2 Foundation - *SUM2 Fund* July 05, 2014, 11:56:25 AM #99 Quote from: SUM2dev on July 04, 2014, 05:14:37 PM Quote from: soopy452000 on July 04, 2014, 04:57:02 PM NavajoCoin Aka SummerCoinV2 Sneak Peak 2 - Decentralized Nodes (New Addition)



You now have the ability to choose a preferred Navajo Node for the transaction to be routed through apart from the one's hard-coded one's and at your own discretion.







The system is now 100% decentralized!

The system is now 100% decentralized!

Watching sneak peek 2 I noticed some things, and since you're in the development stage, I have a couple of suggestions:



1) How GreedyJohn has already noticed in the first preview, but it went unnoticed by everyone else, the references

to the total coin, the balance and unit of coin to spend still refers to the units (CODE), I think it comes from the

previous wallet from which you are making the fork. Obviously it's just an oversight and should be corrected.



2) I saw that the field used to select the node on which route the Navajo transition, appears to be a simple Text Area.

IMHO, it could be much more user friendly to use a Drop-down List filled automatically with the Navajo active nodes,

or (a little more complex) a list of selectable nodes from which the wallet might choose randomly.

On my proposal maybe there are downsides that I am not able to consider, as I have not much information on the function

of these nodes, for example, on what basis should we choose one or another.

So you consider whether it is right to change the TextArea into a Drop-down List or not.



3) I noticed that in the picture there is no field for the "Transaction Comment."

This feature was not present in the original SUM wallet, but as you know has been included in V. 1.0.7.

In the current version of the SUM2 wallet this function is newly gone, I guess to avoid confusion during

the operation of SWAP.

Now the swap is terminated, and personally I think it is a useful feature, re-include it would be a sign of constant evolution,

and it would now be usable by users as a simple reminder to the transaction, and in the future it may also lead to the

development of other functions, such as the integration with external applications.

The lack of Transaction Comment in the new wallet, it's just an oversight or is a precise design choice?





PS:

If I have correctly understood the info-graphics/dataflow, the system will be decentralized to 33%, and 66% monopolized.

But I may have misunderstood. Watching sneak peek 2 I noticed some things, and since you're in the development stage, I have a couple of suggestions:1) How GreedyJohn has already noticed in the first preview, but it went unnoticed by everyone else, the referencesto the total coin, the balance and unit of coin to spend still refers to the units (CODE), I think it comes from theprevious wallet from which you are making the fork. Obviously it's just an oversight and should be corrected.2) I saw that the field used to select the node on which route the Navajo transition, appears to be a simple Text Area.IMHO, it could be much more user friendly to use a Drop-down List filled automatically with the Navajo active nodes,or (a little more complex) a list of selectable nodes from which the wallet might choose randomly.On my proposal maybe there are downsides that I am not able to consider, as I have not much information on the functionof these nodes, for example, on what basis should we choose one or another.So you consider whether it is right to change the TextArea into a Drop-down List or not.3) I noticed that in the picture there is no field for the "Transaction Comment."This feature was not present in the original SUM wallet, but as you know has been included in V. 1.0.7.In the current version of the SUM2 wallet this function is newly gone, I guess to avoid confusion duringthe operation of SWAP.Now the swap is terminated, and personally I think it is a useful feature, re-include it would be a sign of constant evolution,and it would now be usable by users as a simple reminder to the transaction, and in the future it may also lead to thedevelopment of other functions, such as the integration with external applications.The lack of Transaction Comment in the new wallet, it's just an oversight or is a precise design choice?PS:If I have correctly understood the info-graphics/dataflow, the system will be decentralized to 33%, and 66% monopolized.But I may have misunderstood.