Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is now considering unspecified actions to hamper free speech and silence hateful criticism…. According to the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) the Liberal government is prepared to “tackle any form of hate or threat” directed at Members of Parliament (MP). Every member of Parliament — and indeed, every Canadian — is entitled to work and live in an environment that is free of hate speech and the threat of violence,” PMO spokesman Cameron Ahmad wrote.

Every citizen in Canada is also entitled to live in a country where he or she feels safe from jihad terror and the Islamic agenda of civilizational jihad and conquest outlined in the Muslim Brotherhood’s Strategic Plan for North America.

The controversy in Canada over hatred and threats allegedly directed to Members of Parliament (MP) is part of the larger controversy over Toronto-area MP Iqra Khalid’s efforts to force through “anti-Islamophobia” motion M-103. The Center for Israel and Jewish Affairs, among others, presented her with the option of promoting instead a motion against “anti-Muslim bigotry,” rejecting the term “Islamophobia” as “misleading, ambiguous, and politically charged,” but Khalid remains resolute in pushing her anti- “Islamophobia” agenda, which is widely seen as a first step to curb the freedom of speech. Her motion enables the current incursion of anti-democratic values into Canada, as we see from the example of Europe: the Muslim migrant chaos and rampant crime, including the rape of infidel women, has been arrogantly waved away by leftist politicians and leaders who insist that it is “racist” to point out the fact that Islamic texts contain justifications for such crimes. These rapes are not isolated cases, but are committed so frequently in part because of the justification for them within Islamic teaching:

(Quran 24:31) And tell the believing women to reduce of their vision and guard their private parts and not expose their adornment except that which appears thereof and to wrap their headcovers over their chests and not expose their adornment except to their husbands, their fathers, their husbands’ fathers, their sons, their husbands’ sons, their brothers, their brothers’ sons, their sisters’ sons, their women, that which their right hands possess, or those male attendants having no physical desire, or children who are not yet aware of the private aspects of women. And let them not stamp their feet to make known what they conceal of their adornment. And turn to Allah in repentance, all of you, O believers, that you might succeed.

If a woman does not cover up, she is fair game to be assaulted:

(Quran 33:59) O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused.

Any Muslim who supports democracy and the rights of women is quick to maintain that the literal understanding of such texts are antiquated, barbaric and have no place in modern times.

Omar Alghabra, another Toronto-area MP, has resorted to arrogantly insulting Canadians for daring to question the obvious threat of introducing Sharia values into Canada. Back in 2002, Alghabra stated that he did not believe that Hamas (a Muslim Brotherhood proxy group) or Islamic Jihad were terrorist groups, prompting any reasonable Canadian to question Alghabra’s personal commitment to Canadian and Western values. Alghabra has also “openly stated that he favors Sharia Law for Ontario and that he was disappointed when he did not happen in Ontario after the 2003/2006 debate in Ontario.”

The “Islamophobia” agenda is being pushed at the highest levels. The former Secretary General of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, Ekmeleddin Mehmet İhsanoğlu, has stated: “The OIC has become an indispensable player at the international level, in many domains, notably in the realms of dialogue among civilizations, defending the image of Islam, and combating the phenomenon of Islamophobia.”

The OIC is an international organization with the objective of establishing global Sharia. Its activists exploit the generosity of Westerners as they aggressively beat down critics through intimidation and the imputation of guilt. In the case of M-103, Iqra Khalid uses the victimology narrative to promote her “Islamophobia” agenda…..

Iqra Khalid, the Toronto-area Muslim MP who introduced the divisive “Islamophobia” motion without defining “Islamophobia,” told reporters last month that she received a lot of angry emails over her potential legislation. Someone even called her an “idiot” and “scumbag,” she reported. Another writer apparently promised not to shoot Khalid but said he was “going to be there to film you on the ground crying.”

While Khalid advances her schemes through guilt, she was in cahoots with the virulently anti-Semitic Muslim Student Association; she was its president while at York University as a student, and she has also allied herself with Palestine House in Mississauga, which was defunded by the Conservative Harper government for supporting terrorism.

“Trudeau Gov’t Looking At Ways To Protect Members Of Parliament From Hateful Criticism”, by David Krayden, Daily Caller, March 5, 2017: