Warning: Graphic details follow.

Gavin MacMillan testified the complainant was coherent and consenting when she initiated and "aggressively led" sexual activity with him and another man at a bar on College St., but security video from half an hour earlier shows her staggering across the bar, slumping into a chair and passing out, the Crown suggested in cross-examination Thursday afternoon.

“If you were behind that bar and were seeing what you just saw … and she pulled out her car keys and said have a good night, I’m driving home now, you would never let her leave,” prosecutor Rick Nathanson said.

“I would be concerned for her … because she is not walking straight,” MacMillan said. He was not at the bar at this time, at about 11:33 p.m.

The video shows the other defendant, Enzo DeJesus Carrasco, pulling the complainant over to the bar and slapping her face after she has spent 10 minutes in the chair. A few minutes later, she gets up and staggers out of the bar, almost crashing into a table.

“Would you let her drive home 19 minutes later?” Nathanson said.

“It depends on her condition, I don’t know what is affecting her like that. I don’t believe it was alcohol at all,” MacMillan said. He said if it was alcohol, she would not recover enough to drive in that time.

MacMillan, 44, and DeJesus Carrasco, 34, have both pleaded not guilty to charges of gang sexual assault, forcible confinement and drugging with intent to overpower. DeJesus Carrasco has pleaded not guilty to two additional charges of sexual assault. All the charges are linked to the one complainant.

The jury has heard MacMillan was the owner of the College Street Bar and DeJesus Carrasco the manager.

At issue is whether the complainant consented to sex acts and whether she had the capacity to consent. Her identity is covered by a publication ban.

The now 27-year-old complainant has testified she could only remember bits and pieces of what happened that night, including being raped simultaneously and being forced to perform oral sex. She said she did not consent at any point and said DeJesus Carrasco raped her again at his home after they left the bar.

Footage from eight security cameras inside College Street Bar show much of what took place in the bar from when the complainant arrived at 7:30 p.m. on Dec. 14, 2016 until she left for the last time at 6 a.m. the following morning, excluding an hour or so while she was in the women’s washroom.

MacMillan has testified he had shots of whiskey with the complainant and DeJesus Carrasco at around 10 p.m. He remembered one or two shots, the Crown alleges the video shows three shots in a 10-minute period.

MacMillan returned to the bar at around 11:51 p.m. after DeJesus Carrasco texted him about receiving some cocaine and was surprised to see the complainant still there. The video shows the complainant was sitting at the bar, bent forward with her head lying on the bar top.

MacMillan said he asked if she was OK and “she perked up and said yes.” He said she’d had a few drinks but was not at the point of intoxication and he had no concerns about her cognitive capacity. He said she was speaking clearly.

She did two lines of cocaine, once off the bar and once off a tray held by MacMillan, according to MacMillan and the video.

“Taking cocaine doesn’t make you more sober,” Nathanson said.

“It doesn’t make you more sober; it makes you more alert,” MacMillan said.

“If someone was too drunk to drive you wouldn’t say, ‘hey take two lines of cocaine and you’ll be fine!’ ” Nathanson said.

“No, I wouldn’t,” MacMillan said.

MacMillan said that, at about 12.03 a.m., the complainant was making sexually suggestive comments and told the two men she wanted to have a threesome, that she wanted to be submissive and that she wanted to perform oral sex on both men.

Nathanson suggested that at this time the complainant was extremely intoxicated and unable to stand on her own. MacMillan disagreed.

MacMillan also testified he was made uncomfortable and awkward by the complainant’s requests to be sexually dominated, which he’d never done before.

Loading... Loading... Loading... Loading... Loading... Loading...

Nathanson suggested in the video he seemed very comfortable with the role and appeared in the video to be directing the activity, not the complainant.

“I’m a quick study,” said MacMillan, later adding: “I take body language cues.”

Nathanson questioned how he could know the complainant well enough in just a few minutes to understand her cues. MacMillan said it was part of the role play and “it was turning her on.”

The video shows MacMillan holding the complainant and pushing her back against the bar while speaking to her. He said he could not remember what he was saying.

Nathanson suggested he was telling the complainant that she had to do exactly what they said and sexually satisfy them or she wouldn’t be allowed to leave.

MacMillan said he absolutely disagreed with this.

Nathanson said the complainant ultimately “just gives up and the pain and the humiliation in that surrender is dulled by the substances running through her veins at the hands of yourself and (DeJesus Carrasco).”

MacMillan said he strongly disagreed.

MacMillan testified the complainant wanted to be “controlled and manipulated” by the two men as part of her submissive role play, which is why they can be seen moving and positioning her body.

He said she was able to move by herself if she wanted to.

MacMillan said the complainant never said no at any point, and that all the sexual activity was “one hundred per cent consensual.” He said that she was moaning, smiling and it appeared it was “very pleasureful,” for her.

He said he repeatedly asked her if she was enjoying what occurred, including being slapped and having her hair pulled, which he did because she asked him to. He said he filmed her using her phone and his phone at her request.

“I think everyone had a good time … everyone enjoyed it,” he said of that night, although he was initially uncomfortable with the presence of another man and had not been involved in a threesome before.

He said that before he left the complainant asked him to delete the videos on his phone and he did so once he had charged his phone.

The trial continues.