Throughout history, jails and prisons have been terrible places, which mostly kept bad guys locked away from the rest of us. There was little in the way of reform, and most were happy about that, and still are. Who could blame them today, with so many soft judges letting criminals walk the streets as free men and women? They have every reason to want prisoners to suffer behind bars.

However, there is a way to punish prisoners adequately while still reforming them so that when they return, few will repeat their crimes. It is not another cliched plan but an original approach, and if tinkered with, it may fail.

The plan’s basic elements are as follows:



1. Quarantining Criminals

What does anyone think will happen when criminals are stuck in cells all day, together? Many will brag about their exploits, and others will ask many detailed questions. Rapists will teach thieves about the finer details of how to rape, while thieves will teach racketeers how to shoplift, and extortionists will instruct child molesters on the art of blackmailing. It is the College of Crime. If you wish to learn how to steal, rob, rape, pillage, blackmail, kill, molest and kidnap, go to prison. Where is the best place to dispose of a body? What kind of clothes should you wear to shoplift? What are the best con-artist routines? How do you open a locked car? Prisoners will fill you up with great advice and details on all these activities and many more, giving you step by step, face to face instructions. You will come out of prison much more of a criminal than when you entered, and you will have many new friends and connections to encourage you into committing crimes. To truly have a chance of reforming inmates, you need to keep them the hell away from other inmates.



2: Privatization & removal of red tape

Federal, State, and local governments are renowned for their inefficiency and waste. Public servants do not spend their money, but yours, which makes wastefulness easy. Also, thanks to unions, they are rarely sacked, which removes their incentive to try hard. Government workers are often asked favors by their co-workers, friends, and family, and some become suppliers of stolen property or services care of the taxpayer. Easily bribed, they allow others to bend the rules, escape fees, avoid fines, or delete taxes, in exchange for favors of their own. The more power bureaucrats enjoy, the more corrupt they can sometimes become, spending their days playing games, chatting online, and boasting about the holidays they enjoy on full pay. Annoyingly many pat each other on the back for jobs poorly done, saying, “Great job!” Over time they firmly believe they are heroes. It is a pathetic spectacle.

Privatizing prisons needs to take place wholly, not partially. When you only privatize one jail and smother it with government regulation, it will barely function better than a State-run facility. Remove the red and green tape, and privatize all such institutions, and you will see a massive change for the better.



3: State legislated charter

Now for the part that trips up Lefties, who howl in pain when anyone mentions privatization. A State Charter would govern the essential function of private prisons. It would not strangle the business in red tape but would be a checklist of basics, and a warning to those who might break the rules. This charter would apply to all prisons and jails in a State. Each State would have its own rules, either the same or with slight changes, but the decision to privatize should be up to each State.



4: Franchising

Each prison or jail would be a franchise, and the number purchased by one owner would depend on his success, calculated according to his prison’s recidivism rate. According to this Special Report (backup here) from the U.S. Department of Justice, 2018:

Five in 6 (83%) state prisoners released in 2005 across 30 states were arrested at least once during the 9 years following their release. The remaining 17% were not arrested after release during the 9-year follow-up period.

About 4 in 9 (44%) prisoners released in 2005 were arrested at least once during their first year after release 40 (figure 1). About 1 in 3 (34%) were arrested during their third year after release, and nearly 1 in 4 (24%) 30 were arrested during their ninth year.

Governments think this lousy recidivism rate is fine and dandy, and congratulate themselves on a job well done. As Donald Trump might say, it is a shithole rate. Consider that the report above cuts off at the nine-year mark, but more prisoners would be arrested in years 10 to 20, making the percentage higher. Also, many crimes go unsolved by government-run police, so the real recidivism rate would be higher again if the police did their job correctly. In short, government prisons suck. Probably close to 95% of prisoners re-offend, which is a dreadful failure, equal to a score of less than 1 mark out of 10!

Owners of private prisons could open another jail if they were in the top 20% of the lowest recidivism rate. Those owners in the losing 80% category would not be able to expand, providing all a strong incentive to work hard at improving their services. The charter would dictate that prisons with persistently poor records would have their licenses revoked and be put up for sale. The franchise McDonald’s has similar rules. If one of their restaurants suffers persistently poor sales and constant complaints, its franchisee will have his lease canceled or not renewed, and new franchisees will take over.

The top ten and five percent of prison owners would have other incentives, including tax concessions, the ability to buy and expand further, and various other goodies. There would be a limit on total ownership of something like a hundred prisons nationally.



5: Intelligent jail cells

Prisons would operate very differently from those in the past and would generate profits. Racist gangs, violence, hierarchies, shivs, illegal drugs, alcohol, cigarettes, and gambling would not exist inside. Prisoners would not communicate together unless working or studying under strict robot and human supervision. The building’s design and technology would make prohibited contact almost impossible, and there would be little incentive for inmates to try.

Solid steel soundproof cells would be staggered to prevent the use of sound or mirrors to communicate. In the eight corners of each cell would be built-in, tamper-proof cameras, speakers, and microphones. The speakers would provide surround-sound background noise regulated by voice commands, with thousands of choices. Prison officials could also provide messages through the same speakers, and phone calls could be made using the same, with conditions.

Background sounds (city, beach, forest, etcetera) would help inmates remain rational. They would keep their sanity while being punished, which is what you want. It is the key to assisting them to change for the better. They would prefer to be home instead of stuck in a cell, but making them go crazy only disrupts society further once they are released. Since AI would generate sounds, they would never repeat themselves. All combinations of sounds would be original, as they are in real life.

Cameras would work 24 hours a day in light or dark, and computers would monitor vision, alerting humans if needed. As long as an inmate was not doing anything suspicious, no humans would watch. The inmate would have one less thing to fret about, again, reducing his mental torture. He would have a sense of privacy and an incentive to behave well.

Inmates’ food would be delivered to their door by robots only when the inmate was lying on his stomach on the bed, with his hands in front of a sensor plate on the wall. The cell’s watching computers would monitor this. If the inmate tried to move towards the food entry port, it would instantly shut, and the inmate would miss his meal. The same would apply when removing or supplying dishware, laundry, and toilet paper. To cut down on disease, all inmates would need to wash their hands before eating and after using the lavatory. Failure to comply would make the cell power down, so all light, TV and sounds would turn off.

A menu would be available, and inmates would place orders through voice commands. Saying “menu” would bring a response and a list of foods available. Inmates would not gather in a cafeteria to eat, and nor would they gather in any courtyard to exercise or communal showers to wash.



6: Gym

Every hundred prisoners would require a gym catering for one prisoner at a time, between the hours of 6.00 am and 9.00 pm., seven days a week. Each prisoner would use the gym for 50 minutes weekly. A personal trainer would assist them as they went through a variety of exercises, and these would be carefully recorded and adjusted to the inmates’ ability and condition. There would be a ten-minute gap between inmates for sterilizing equipment. Guards would escort cuffed prisoners to and from the gym, making sure none met on the way. The few hours left over would be used for proper cleaning and maintenance of equipment. During their time in the gym, inmates’ cells would be cleaned by cleaning bots.



7: Entertainment

Television would be available but no phones, computers or games. Inmates could buy phone calls from their smart jail cells if they had money in their jail cash accounts (voice calls, not video). A computer would monitor and record their conversation, and some numbers and subjects would not be allowed. They would be limited to two or three calls a day unless there were important reasons to allow more.



8: Work, training, and profits

Any business must make profits, and a private prison is no exception. To accomplish this without leaning on taxpayers, inmates would have to do far more. First, any money they have will need to be used to help fund their stay in jail. For that to happen, laws would be changed. Bills would be passed, allowing private prisons to charge inmates for their accommodation. Money would be taken from their bank accounts or seized possessions, legally. If Fat Tony robbed a bank and went to jail, his house, car, and furniture would be sold to pay prison expenses. Whatever remained on his bill would need to be paid off through work, arranged by the prison. Produce from crime would also be included if rightful owners remained unknown.

Prisoners’ records and behavior would determine their grouping. Some would be put into chain gangs to work on various projects, paid for by private enterprise. The chain would only connect three inmates at a time, rather than larger groups. Since food and board are provided, their wages would be below minimum wage, and 75% would be taken for any bills they owed. The rest would go into their accounts. Profits from the actual job in question would be kept by the prison.

In the meantime, inmates could learn a trade. Each week they would be provided half a day to learn auto mechanics, plumbing, carpentry, building, bricklaying, roofing, painting, plastering, electrical work, or landscaping. Those performing well could receive a valid license of some kind after some years.

If his sentence was not over, a prisoner could qualify to teach the same trade to other inmates and earn a wage for this. His salary would be small, and he would pay much for unpaid bills, but this would also save the prison money. Inmates taking teaching positions would also impress a parole board, possibly leading to an earlier release.

Training programs teaching inmates how to improve their lives and manage their money would also be available. If an inmate attended these sessions and did well, he would be given a higher wage when working on the chain gang. Inmates would learn the value of manners, honesty, and a good reputation.

At the end of an inmates’ term, before release, he would attend ‘leaving’ classes, that would look closely at his plans and means. What was he going to do, and how would he pay for it? Other class members would add their opinions and advice. Any connections the prison had with previous inmates, now in business, would be used to improve his chances. He would be provided names of people to contact for possible jobs and help in reconnecting with society.



9: Why a decent prison is not a ‘hotel’

This idea for prison reform will have its critics who will say, “Prison is meant to punish prisoners, not be a desirable hotel,” but their description would only be half right.

Yes, prison is meant to punish, but my system is by no means desired. Which hotel forces you to work in a chain gang, or to stay in a tiny cell all day and night, for years? Show me a hotel that will not let you use the internet and restricts private phone calls. Nobody wants to be in jail, even when the prison can reform. Which would you prefer: prisons that treat inmates so poorly that they come out worse than when they went in or prisons that transform a large percentage of criminals into honest citizens?



10: No misbehavior copied or taught

Most prisons are breeding grounds for violence, racism, and crime. Oddly enough, documentaries about jail life often feature this terrible behavior as though the authorities are proud of it. Many government wardens and guards think it is okay that racist gangs decide how things will be inside. Black inmates tell journalists why they hate whites and Latinos, and how they will beat them up if they cross their boundaries. White’s gnash their teeth about the other groups, threatening to shiv them at the slightest provocation. Guards stand around nodding in agreement, giving the arrangement their blessing. When questioned, they shrug and say, “It is what it is,” with Einstein-like focus.

In traditional prisons, inmates get together in many areas, from shared cells, exercise yards, canteen meals, and group showers. Gangsters teach newbies the ropes. Some inmates end up raped, others beaten, and some are forced to provide money to avoid a similar fate.

In the prison system proposed here, there would be no such grooming since none of the prisoners would meet unless they were working or in class, under strict supervision at all times. Anyone trying to groom anyone else would be banned for months, instantly.



11: Neck collars

During education or work, among other prisoners, each inmate would wear a neck collar that would be listening, watching, and communicating to the said inmate. It would be tamper-proof and un-blockable. Any racist or grooming behavior would be forbidden. Computers would surveil through collars at all times, alerting humans when necessary.

Drugs would not exist in prison. Any guard found guilty of smuggling them in would be sacked immediately and face criminal charges themselves. Any visitor found trying to sneak illegal goods into the prison would be banned from visiting for five years and charged with criminal offenses.



12: Lie Detectors

All prisoners applying for parole or early release would be subject to lie detector tests, and these would play a role in the decision made by boards. For those who say lie detectors are not a hundred percent accurate, I point out that neither are the humans on the parole board, in judging the inmates’ honesty. Some humans are wildly incorrect, yet they remain on the board. A lie detector is a tool that provides data to be judged by those humans. It does not make final decisions; they do. Finally, lie detectors do not live in 1965 – they are a continually-improving technology. By the time private prisons like the ones I describe exist, lie detectors will be twice as good as they are now, and eventually, their success rate will be 100%. If you refuse to use them, then you may as well not use humans either.



13: Recidivism rate

The recidivism rate would be low for most private prisons of this kind, certainly compared to government prisons, which are about as high as they can be. As such, crime would drop markedly, and society would benefit significantly. Prices of goods and services would decrease since shop-owners would no longer need to mark up prices to cover theft. Insurance would cost less, life expectancy would rise, and prison populations would shrink, as would the number of prisons required. The impact of this would be extraordinary.



Summary of main points:

Privatization and franchising of prisons

A legislated charter with simple guidelines

Expansion only allowed for those with low recidivism rates

Payment for costs by inmates, through assets and labor

Quarantine of prisoners – keeping them separate most of the time

Smart soundproof cells with microphones, cameras, and speakers in every corner

Smart collars with the same

24-hour monitoring by AI computers, in jail cells and collars

Robot delivery of food, laundry, books, minimizing contact with human guards

Gym time alone, once a week, with trainer



Background noise to counter effects of cells’ soundproofing

Work gangs to make money for prison

Training to licensed new trades for prisoners

Use of lie detectors by parole boards

Effective counseling before release to make re-entry into society a success

So, which political leader has the courage to start the ball rolling in their State? Once you do, all other States will see the dramatic effect and eventually copy you. Pretty soon, society will look back to the days of old when prisons were the way they are now, and blush with embarrassment. “How primitive we used to be!” they will lament.

You know I am correct in my assessment, so what is stopping you? Why remain rooted in medieval times when you could be a shining star in history, changing things for the better?

A felon sentenced to fifty years in today’s prisons is a wasted life and a drain upon taxpayers, swallowing up millions of their dollars. That same person would be paying his way and being reformed in my system, able to leave prison in 20 years, to live productively. For those who were never released, at least they would still contribute to society through their work.