The adman and actor pokes fun of the director for the historical accuracies found in the film.

SLB's bucket of woes is overflowing day by day! After the Pinga controversy and that Peshwa descendants are going down hard on him for historical inaccuracies over Bajirao Mastani, Sanjay Leela Bhansali finds another voice of dissent in adman Bharat Dabholkar. Also Read - Deepika Padukone's Padmavati starts rolling on a musical note!

Bharat Dabholkar, who was seen in Company and Corporateand currently acting in Ananth Mahadevan's historical film, wrote a satirical piece on Facebook about Mahadevan's working style. In a jestful manner, he poke fun at the director's 'adamancy' in sticking to historical accuracies. In doing so, he also made digs at Sanjay Leela Bhansali and how he modulated Peshwa Bajirao's love story to suit his vision. Also Read - IIFA Awards 2016 LIVE: Priyanka Chopra's melodious singing will leave you AMAZED - watch video!

This is how his Facebook post looked like, Also Read - Bajirao Mastani and Befikre have set Ranveer Singh APART from the rest of the actors, suggests trade expert!

"It may not be the most diplomatic thing to say in public,but it has been weighing on my mind so I might as well say it. I hate working with a director like Ananth Mahadevan. I recently acted in a period film directed by him and was disgusted with his fanatical sticking to the correct historical and character details of the period , i.e. 1890. I kept telling him about creative liberties one should take but he wouldn't budge. I gave him many creative suggestions that would have made the film 'sexier' so to say, but he kept turning them down saying that won't be authentic, that character is real and he/she wouldn't behave like that in that era. I mean, come on, what's this stubbornness? Just to give you a couple of examples, in one scene, set in 1890s, the protagonist wins a case in a British court. So I suggested that to demonstrate her happiness she should drop her pallu and dance on the judge's desk , with the bailiff and others dancing in chorus line and judge joining in, throwing in the air his white wig. He said NO.

In another scene there is this girl going abroad with a big suitcase, so I suggested that we can put a dead body in that suitcase so she can dump it mid -sea (will remind audiences of recent murder cases, so topical and fascinating, you would agree ) he said NO. And the list goes on and on. I got sick and tired of this sticking to authenticity of that period .

I would rather work with Sanjay Leela Bhansali, who takes these creative leaps (and damn historical realities) . Peshwa's wife dancing with her sauten in an alluring midriff showing dance (so deliciously erotic). Or the peshwa dancing and mouthing words like 'dushman chi wat laavli (so topical and so close to how today's tapori Maharashtrians would talk, and therefore so relatable to the youth.) He could have also said that I can't do this because my film is based on true historical characters and I have to stick to authenticity, but he didn't. More strength to his tribe. And then there are these directors like Shri Mahadevan, chhya!! So Mr Mahadevan, I don't want to act in your films anymore. So next time you want a good looking and talented actor, look elsewhere.

Thank you."

Wonder how Sanjay Leela Bhansali would react to this!