On the Monday edition of CNN’s Inside Politics, Washington Post political reporter Abby Phillip employed a tiresome tactic to deflect away from any number of the Clinton scandals and particularly the revelations via WikiLeaks because it’s all “too complicated” to explain to voters in building a case against her.

Host John King turned from Donald Trump’s continued issues with female voters to Clinton’s ongoing problems with the truth as he explained that, despite the Clinton campaign’s deflections, “just now voters are learning some of the things in these WikiLeak releases that are pretty damaging or at least raise serious questions.”

King then aired a clip of State of the Union host Jake Tapper grilling Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook on one WikiLeaks revelation that “[t]he King of Morocco wanted to donate $12 million to the Clinton Foundation this year, but he only wanted to do it if he could get a face-to-face meeting with Hillary Clinton.”

Yahoo! News correspondent Olivier Knox responded after the video by pointing out the reality that such “external shocks” like the WikiLeaks dumps would be having more of an impact “if [Trump] is a plausible alternative” in the eyes of voters as exhibited in poll after poll that while voters dislike Clinton, many despise Trump even more.

This led right into Phillip, who initially acknowledged that the near-constant pop-ups of either new Clinton scandals or further details about one have translated to “her unfavorability ratings are really sky high, and it is in there.”

Phillip changed her tune thereafter and chalked up the unfavorability to it largely being “baked into the electorate” and then dropped the decades-old line of Clinton scandals being too “complicated”(for just a few examples, see here and here):

[B]ut we're seeing it's not enough to push voters over the line to support Trump, and also, it's a complicated. I mean, some of this stuff is not easy to boil down. It is complicated to prosecute an argument against her on these grounds, and I think that Trump is having trouble prosecuting that case, and he's not doing it, frankly with any consistency.

<<< Please consider helping NewsBusters financially with your tax-deductible contribution today >>>

Almost immediately, conservative and The Federalist writer Mary Katharine Ham shot back that “what’s not complicated, though, is look, the argument this is a person doing business in Washington” and doing it “as usual and it's really bad business, and here's where it is and he can point to it.”

However, Ham quickly pointed to how Trump hasn’t been able to do so “consistently without veering into the other brambles he's been in.”

The segment wound down with more of those sentiments that Trump could have thrived in light of these Clinton scandals if he had been more disciplined with The Boston Globe’s Matt Viser ruling that “[h]e had those moments where he did and those were his most effective moments and then suddenly he shifts to, I'm going to sue those women.”

King concluded that Trump could have “made the case consistently” but “instead he goes to Gettysburg the other day” and spends portions of a speech intended to be a preview of his first 100 days as president if elected on how he’ll sue the women who have accused him of sexual misconduct.

The relevant portions of the transcript from CNN’s Inside Politics on October 24 can be found below.