Meaninglessness

“There is meaning in dreaming, but there is also dreaming in meaning.” -Tenzin Wangyal Rinpoche, The Tibetan Yogas of Dream and Sleep

I noticed last night that the frog-bug inside its shell glitches, shakes and slows down like a lodge scene “shrouded in the temporality of fantasy.” BOB also appears glitchy inside his shell. Surrealist objects for Lynch are not just a complicated metaphor and brain-blood flow-state; they are waking dreams. Untainted by reason, they are fragments of real space altered to solicit the viewers' unconscious desires. Moreover, like the mind — a ‘found-subject’ — these strange, altered ‘found-objects’ aren’t categorizable, aren’t placeable; they do not make sense. We don’t know what to do with them, and so we dream outside the box, and subject and object blend into something surreal.

According to Breton, surrealist objects appear as “hypnagogic images” — that is, as half-waking, half-dreaming visual experiences. They poke fun at the analytical mind, the part of us set on making things make sense. As soon as that part gives up, however, we can finally taste freedom from meaning; freedom from dreaming. Let the Lynchian object hold your attention just for a second, and watch part of yourself flicker out, while another part flickers on. Then, according to Breton, we can see things “that are not visible.”

Lynch likes to talk about how he will fall in love with an idea and have to include it in a film even if it doesn’t make sense…especially if it doesn’t make sense. If you love it, trust it. Of course, for Lynch, meaninglessness and confusion are exalted spiritual states. He views the world through the lens of Transcendental Meditation, a method that employs the power of meaningless sounds to quiet the brain and lure practitioners into an oceanic consciousness beyond our ordinary sense of space and time.

Meaningless associations, meaningless objects, meaningless characters also have the potential to lure viewers beyond themselves. This ‘placeless place’ is correlated with experiences of deep rest, and, according to TMers like Lynch, a “unified field” which offers an “ocean of solutions.” Ideas are like fish, and you have to go deep to catch the really big ones. And the biggest ideas, the strangest images, arrive as visual koans that substantiate and beg the question, who is trying to make meaning here? Who is dreaming contradictory meanings into this “visual experience”? Are you dreaming? And the answer is always, no matter what state of consciousness you are in, or which character you are in Twin Peaks, yes you are!

The surrealist object can signify something outside itself. It has meaning, real significance, even if that meaning is situated, shifting and subjective. Here we can be reminded of creamed corn, Jumping Man, or the Log Lady. These hybrid-objects provoke many meanings — but like the sounds used in mantra meditation, they also point beyond meaning altogether.

Alfred Gell, in Art and Agency, argues that enchantment is a kind technology, and if the art object is made technically well it gets a “halo” which startles the consciousness of the viewer, seducing them into an altered and adoring state of mind. I think that is one way to understand why Twin Peaks fans believe so whole-heartedly that the show points to what Breton called “ultimate reality, surreality.” It’s just so well made.

Twin Peaks is sometimes called an anti-narrative narrative, anti-nostalgia nostalgia, or an anti-serious serious TV show. It’s your classic self-contradictory anti-art art experience, and because it resists what it is, in that resistance is a new space, a new opening, and we are granted new “room to dream.”