The Times wants gun control:

The Times’ editorial board describes as a “moral outrage” and “national disgrace” that under Constitutional protections Americans are legally permitted to purchase deadly weapons that “kill people with brutal speed and efficiency.”

You would think it was fear, except for the fact that they support importing more of the same types of Muslim terrorists from Syria who just ignored the gun laws of California to kill normal law-abiding Americans in massive numbers.

They want to import mass killers who ignore gun laws to kill decent Americans, and they want law-abiding citizens disarmed and defenseless – denied the same weapons the terrorists will use. That doesn’t make logical sense, unless you view it as an r-selected instinct. Then it makes perfect sense.

Viewed that way, the r-selected human rabbits of liberalism want a massive high mortality rate placed on their populations, identical to that which rabbits and other r-selected prey species have in nature, and they want to take measures to make sure that the mortality is not selective for fitness, intelligence, or defensive ability by disarming everyone equally, rendering those who would fight unable to do so. They want to create a human version of hawks out of the terrorists, to foist an r-selecting selective pressure on Americans. But that only works if every human is killed equally, regardless of fitness, intelligence, daring, or defensive ability.

The liberal rabbits don’t know this consciously. They haven’t thought it through. It isn’t a logically thought out plan. There is no blueprint or flow-sheet. But the urges are imbued instinctually within r-strategists to produce this outcome because that is the world they are designed for, and we all are most comfortable in the world we are designed for. The overall effect is not bothersome to them, in the same way it is bothersome to us. They want that rabbit-like, prey-species model of existence for Americans, because that is what they are designed to be. They literally cannot imagine anything else.

The alternative to that hypothesis is that the r-selected component of our populace, which exhibits every aspect of the rabbit’s r-selected reproductive strategy – from conflict aversion, to promiscuity, to single mom’ing, to sexualization of young, to total lack of loyalty – just happens, by sheer chance, to have adopted the most illogical route forward from the perspective of personal safety. They want to disarm the good guys with laws, and actively import more bad guys who we know will break the law and kill us in large numbers. In addition, the rabbits just happen to be repulsed by the most common-sense path forward, namely the good guys owning weapons to defend ourselves while banning immigration from the center of the hotbed of ISIS, especially when that group has promised to use the refugee crisis to infiltrate sleeper cells into our nation.

And then there would have to be the biggest coincidence of all – this r-selected rabbity cohort’s weird, nonsensical urges just happen to perfectly create for our nation the closest thing to the rabbit’s r-selected environment of constant mass mortality absent selection of the fittest.

It seems like an awful lot of coincidence.

Apocalypse cometh™ and the wolves are rising.