A few days ago, a young girl in Iran climbed atop a small barricade, took off her hijab, and waved a white flag to protest Islamism. By doing so, she courted not only prison- but also public humiliation, rape and torture by the fanatical supporters of the Theocratic Islamic Republic of Iran. A social commenter, Armin Navabi, released the video of the scene as well as statements by young Iranian Nationalists declaring “We are Aryan and we won’t worship Arabs”– but the fate of the young girl remains unknown.

Here in India, our local champions of Women’s Rights have been busier in most worthwhile matters. While a chunk of them have been busy mocking and trolling the actress Anuskha Sharma for committing the dire sin of ‘perpetuating the Patriarchy’ by applying sindoor to celebrate her marriage, others- such as the famed feminist lawyer Indira Jaising have embarked on defences of Triple Talaq that would make even a Taliban cleric beam at them with approval- before insisting they wear the Hijab, of course.

Feminism is, at this point of time, an utter and complete Fraud- if not a direct threat to the existence of all right-thinking peoples of the World.

The one narrative that seeps out from the current narrative surrounding Feminism is its utter and complete antipathy to anything stemming from ‘traditional’- read, Pagan or Ethno-centric- beliefs as well as blind adherence to ‘globalist’ or ‘post-modern’ ideals. Indian Feminists have gone to absurd lengths to peddle their anti-Hindu, anti-Indian narrative- be it JNU historians describing Harems of medieval Islamic tyrannies as ‘Medieval Universities’ or Bengali Intellectuals calling for the replacing of the phrase ‘Men’- as in ‘Statement’ or ‘Mental’- with ‘Myn’- presumably to protest ‘Patriarchal conspiracies’ such as Sanity or the English Language. We are told that Sindoor is regressive while Hijab is a sign of modernity. We are told that Shri Rama was a misogynist while Stalin and Mao are icons of Freedom and Modernity. We are told that reading Amar Chitra Katha magazines is anti-women but drinking and smoking are icons of Women’s Rights. We are told that the very idea of Arya Dharma and Bharata is a ‘patriarchal’ conspiracy by Brahmin males while braying for ‘Free Kashmir, Free Nagaland, Free Dravidianistan’ is the epitome of ‘young progressive values’.

Is it any wonder that when the Pakistanis recently humiliated Avanti and Chetna Jadav- Kulbhushan Jadav’s mother and wife, they made it a point to tell them to remove their Sindoor and Bangles?

Is it any wonder that when their ordeal was over, they were mobbed by a mob of braying posh modern young Pakistani journalists with big degrees with big colleges?

Is it any wonder that over two hundred Feminists and Liberals lined up to sign Mercy petitions for Kasab, a mass-murdering piece of filth, while not one voice has been heard in defence of Jadav when even Baluchis and Iranians have defended him?

It is clear that this ‘Patriarchy’ that Feminists criticize is some sort of synonym for Pagan Civilization and SANITY itself- be it Hindutva in India or Modern Aryanism in Iran.

Back in the 1970s, Feminism and Liberalism were instrumental in the destruction of Iran and its regression into a Theocratic State. It were ‘Liberal Intellectuals’ and ‘Feminist Rebels’ who took advantage of then US President Jimmy Carter’s absurd message of Human Rights to pressurise and demonize the Shah. It were ‘Feminist Rebels’ who led the largest protest marches, who funded the malcontents on the streets, who turned Iranian Universities into hotbeds of treason and, later, jihad. It is the very same Liberals and Feminists who first denounced Iranian Nationalism, who first spat on the concept of an Aryan Iranian family, who so weakened Civil Aryan society in Iran that when the Islamists walked in, there was nary a wisp of resistance.

In India, Feminists claim to be representing the Youth and its ‘new’, ‘progressive’ values. Why these new ‘progressive’ values demand Sharia Law and Harems no one can explain- but all this has happened before.

In the famed political piece ‘The Prophet and the Proletariat’ by Chris Harman- first published in 1994- he pointed out how: ‘…In February 1979 the left wing guerrillas of the Fedayeen and the left-Islamist guerrillas of the People’s Mojahedin succeeded in fomenting large scale mutinies in the armed forces, so bringing about a revolutionary collapse of the old regime. Much of the rising movement had identified with the exiled Islamist Ayatollah Khomeini. His name had come to symbolise opposition to the monarchy.’

The reason for this is obvious.

When Feminists cry out against ‘oppression’ or ‘male chauvinism’ or whatever new half-baked post-modern term they cook up in their universities, what they are actually whining against isn’t some sort of vague Global Male Conspiracy- but instead the local Culture and Civilization itself. Aurobindo called Victimhood and Self-pity the worst sins an Arya might commit- but such whining and complaining what Feminists encourage. By describing the prevailing Traditions as ‘regressive’ and ‘patriarchal’, they perpetuate a sense of false self-pity and victimhood among young women and separate them from the social structures which have fostered the longest running Civilization in the World- Dharma.

As such, these young people run adrift of societal centres which might have served as moral foci for them in previous times- most importantly, the security provided by Family and Faith.

It is, thus, natural for the Hedonists and Morally Corrupt to take advantage among these uprooted youth. Recently the host of one of the biggest Liberal Media Outlets- a prominent Feminist named Cenk Ugyur- was exposed as the exploitative misogynist he was. Ugyur also happens to be a Turk who denies the Turkish genocide of Christian Armenians. Closer home, prominent ‘intellectuals’ who regularly bash Hinduism and Dharma as ‘regressive’ were recently called out by an NRI woman student for essentially whoring out young girls in their big colleges. The founder of a certain ‘comedy’ outlet was also in the news for similar reasons a few months back. However- while the West retains enough civilization pride and self-respect to call out ‘Feminist’ criminals like Ugyur, Indian Youth remain too modern and thus, too blind, to see the foul end that awaits them.

Argue as much as Intellectuals can, there is no question that sexual promiscuity, the destruction of the Family, and mockery of one’s ancestors will ever be the foundation of a Stable Society.

What does await us then? Simple- the same fate that awaited the Feminists and Liberals who started the Iranian Revolution in the 1970s. Since Feminism is pushed primarily by Elites and Intellectuals trying to justify their own hedonism and hatred for prevailing cultural norms using the faux siren of ‘Equality’ as the crutch, the Institutions they build are similarly hollow and morally bankrupt. As such, they are easily swept aside by strong Civilizational Institutions that do not cater to Feminism and thus, retain their societal stability. The only major such Institution that insists on doing so- and coincidently the only one Feminists do respect- is Islamism.

Is it any surprise that Cenk Ugyur who denies the Armenian genocide is a feminist?

Is it any surprise that Indira Jaising who calls the abolishment of Triple Talaq an attack on Muslim men is a feminist?

Is it any surprise that Farasat Latif of the Luton Islamic Centre- described by Tommy Robinson as ‘first point of Radicalization’ in his hometown of Luton- was a revolutionary Leftist in his youth?

Is it any surprise that the notorious Umar Khalid of JNU fame is the son of Syed Qasim Rasool Ilyas of SIMI fame?

Is it any surprise that the Communist hellholes called West Bengal and Kerala are now hotbeds of Islamism with entire villages falling to Sharia? Is it any surprise that Leftist and Feminist bodies are the primary defenders and deniers of ‘Love Jihad’? Is it any surprise that Feminist and Liberal leaders are the fore-front of any movement mocking Arya pride in India- as they were in the days of the Shah in Iran? Is it any surprise that Feminist cry themselves hoarse protesting ‘Hindu Patriarchy’ and ‘Hindu oppression’- as they similarly demonized the Shah of Iran in the 70s while molly-coddling Islamists? The same feminists who went about calling Hindu sadhus ‘frauds’ and ‘lechers’ in the basis of till-now unproven accusations on Asaram bapu are conspicuously silent on regular reports of exploitations of nuns in monasteries, why? Is it any surprise that the same Feminists who call Shri Rama and the Buddha ‘misogynist’ can be found calling Harems places where ‘women… joined Sultan Ghiyas-ud-din to discuss matters of theology and philosophy?’ What philosophy? The Art of wearing Hijabs? Or the Science of Halala?

Feminism is an assault on Sanity itself.

It is an assault on History. It is an assault on Culture. It is an assault on Civilization. It is an assault on Freedom. It is an assault on Children. It is an assault on Women. It is an assault on Men. It is an assault on all that is beautiful and traditional and civilized. Unless the women and men of Bharata make the conscious and deliberate choice to stamp out every vestige of this divisive and hateful ideology, it is clear that we in Bharata will end up in the same pit the Iranians have.