As Twitchy reported, one thing we learned from Wednesday’s impeachment hearings is that “hearsay can be much better evidence” than direct evidence; those were the wise words of Democratic Rep. Mike Quigley. And there was a lot of hearsay going around, as Republican Rep. Jim Jordan so well put it.

Here’s radio host Dan O’Donnell:

In what court of law in this country would the statement “After I testified, my aide told me he overheard Trump through a cell phone tell another guy something about the investigation” be admissible as evidence? — Dan O'Donnell (@DanODonnellShow) November 13, 2019

It doesn’t sound like Quigley convinced a lot of people with his defense of hearsay evidence, and on CNN Wednesday afternoon, legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin even admitted the Democrats have a problem:

CNN’s Toobin: neither witness “had direct contact with the president…that’s a problem”https://t.co/fjNz4cr00Z pic.twitter.com/zKW239luNF — RNC Research (@RNCResearch) November 13, 2019

Ya THINK, Legal Genius? — The Barbarian (@BarbarianinSF) November 13, 2019

Democrats have already voted down the GOP’s request to subpoena the whistleblower, and not even he was on the phone call that set all this off.

Donald Trump Jr. was pretty amused to see Toobin admit the game of telephone the Democrats are playing is going to be a problem.

When even CNN’s Toobin is calling BS… ??? https://t.co/2WzlFpazGA — Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) November 13, 2019

Yeah it is a problem. It means neither one of them are actually witnesses. — Paul Hurst (@pnhurst) November 13, 2019

OMG! Did the Earth just stop spinning too? Never thought I'd hear this from CNN. Must be a sign of the upcoming apocalypse. — joeldt (@joeldt3) November 13, 2019

It’s all a waste of time. — Nancy O'Connor (@ihatecellphones) November 13, 2019

Next witness please, Mr. Biggs? "Yes, sir". What do you know? "The President did a quid pro quo with Ukraine." What proof do you have? "I heard it from a guy at work who heard it on MSNBC." — ?? metalmikef (@metalmikef) November 13, 2019

How can anybody see the hearings and come out with " yeah we need to impeach him"? Makes no sense and they already gave us their star witness ? — R.P Music, Inc. (@rpmusicinc) November 13, 2019

In case anyone is wondering: The needle didn’t move either direction as a result of today’s hearing. No surprise, and I’d say that favors the GOP. — All Better Now (@AllBetterNow1) November 13, 2019

Agreed. No one changed any minds Wednesday, and there weren’t any bombshells the media can use to change the public’s mind either.

Toobin is CANCELLED! — Intoxicating Masculinity (@whiteworkingguy) November 13, 2019

CNNs panel imploded..Hilarious. — ESully16 (@ChromeChaos16) November 13, 2019

CNN will Quickly try and scrub this out. — Ricardo a Patriot (@PatriotRicardo) November 13, 2019

The biggest problem is that these "witnesses" claimed to have psychic powers to be able to mindread the people who were on the call, without providing any evidence of their psychic prowess. Schiff should've asked them to guess what number he was thinking. — mrxak (@mrxak) November 13, 2019

But, but, but, the evidence is “overwhelming”. ? — Gary Smith (@garynada) November 13, 2019

Related: