Recent evolutionary theory has argued that what people find “beautiful” is not arbitrary, but rather has evolved over millions of years of hominid sensory, perceptual, and cognitive evolution. Sensations that have adaptive value (i.e., that enhance safety, survival, and reproduction) often become aesthetically preferred. One purpose of the current study was to present a personality and social attitude template for persons who prefer a relatively recent and generally unappreciated form of art, namely abstract art. One hundred and four college participants (68 female) completed personality (openness and experience seeking) and social attitude questionnaires and recorded their preference for 15 realistic, 15 ambiguous, and 15 abstract works of art. Results showed that open participants preferred every form of art presented, but that this difference increased as the art became more abstract. In addition, those with attitudes more tolerant of political liberalism and drug use preferred abstract art the most.

References

Aiken, N. E. ( 1998 ). The biological origins of art. Westport, CT : Praeger .

Google Scholar

Barron, F. ( 1955 ). The disposition towards originality . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 478 – 485 .

Google Scholar Crossref | Medline

Barron, F. , & Welsh, G. S. ( 1952 ). Artistic perception as a possible factor in personality style . Journal of Psychology, 33, 199 – 203 .

Google Scholar Crossref | ISI

Barrow, J. D. ( 1995 ). The artful universe. Oxford : Clarendon Press .

Google Scholar

Berlyne, D. E. ( 1971 ). Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York : Appleton-Century-Crofts .

Google Scholar

Boselie, F. , & Cesàro, A. ( 1994 ). Disjunctive ambiguity as a determinant of the aesthetic attractivity of visual patterns . Empirical Studies of the Arts, 12(1), 85 – 94 .

Google Scholar SAGE Journals

Brant, L., Marshall, P. H., & Roark, B. ( 1995 ). On the development of prototypes and preferences . Empirical Studies of the Arts, 13(2), 161 – 170 .

Google Scholar SAGE Journals

Child, I. L. ( 1965 ). Personality correlates of esthetic judgement in college students . Journal of Personality, 33, 476 – 511 .

Google Scholar Crossref | Medline | ISI

Child, I. L., Cooperman, M., & Wolowitz, H. M. ( 1968 ). Esthetic preference and other correlates of active versus passive food preference . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11, 75 – 84 .

Google Scholar Crossref | ISI

Coss, R. G. ( 1968 ). The ethological command in art . Leonardo, 1, 273 – 287 .

Google Scholar Crossref | ISI

Costa, P. T. , & McCrae, R. R. ( 1992 ). Revised NEO Personality Inventory and NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Odessa, FL : Psychological Assessment Resources .

Google Scholar

Darwin, C. ( 1871 ). The descent of man. London : Murray (reprinted in 1998 by Prometheus Books).

Google Scholar

Dissanayake, E. ( 1988 ). What is art for? Seattle, WA : Washington University Press .

Google Scholar

Dissanayake, E. ( 1992 ). Homo aestheticus: Where art comes from and why. New York : The Free Press .

Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. J. ( 1941 ). Personality factors and preference judgments . Nature, 148, 346 .

Google Scholar Crossref

Eysenck, H. J. ( 1995 ). Genius: The natural history of creativity. Cambridge, England : Cambridge University Press .

Google Scholar Crossref

Feist, G. J. ( 1998 ). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity . Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290 – 309 .

Google Scholar SAGE Journals

Feist, G. J. ( 2001 ). Natural and sexual selection in the evolution of creativity . Bulletin of Psychology and the Arts, 2, 11 – 16 .

Google Scholar

Furnham, A. , & Avison, M. ( 1997 ). Personality and preference for surreal paintings . Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 923 – 935 .

Google Scholar Crossref | ISI

Furnham, A. , & Bunyan, M. ( 1988 ). Personality and art preferences . European Journal of Personality, 2, 67 – 74 .

Google Scholar Crossref | ISI

Heinrichs, R. W. , & Cupchik, G. C. ( 1985 ). Individual differences as predictors of preference in visual art . Journal of Personality, 53, 502 – 515 .

Google Scholar Crossref | ISI

Hekkert, P. , & Snelders, H. M. J. J. ( 1995 ). Prototypicality as an explanatory concept in aesthetics: A reply to Boselie (1991) . Empirical Studies of the Arts, 13, 149 – 160 .

Google Scholar SAGE Journals

Kagan, J. ( 1994 ). Galen's prophecy: Temperament in human nature. New York : Basic Books .

Google Scholar

Kettlewell, N., Lipscomb, S., Evans, L., & Rosston, K. ( 1990 ). The effect of subject matter and degree of realism on aesthetic preferences for paintings . Empirical Studies of the Arts, 8, 85 – 93 .

Google Scholar SAGE Journals

King, R., Meganathan, J., Nagahara, J., & Boscolo, M. ( 1998 ). Individual differences in complexity preference and artistic style: Neoclassical versus expressionistic aesthetics . Empirical Studies of the Arts, 16, 15 – 23 .

Google Scholar SAGE Journals

Lazarus, R. S. ( 1991 ). Emotion and adaptation. New York : Oxford .

Google Scholar

Lindauer, M. S. , & Dintruff, D. D. ( 1975 ). Contrast effects in the response to art . Perceptual and Motor Skills, 40, 155 – 164 .

Google Scholar SAGE Journals | ISI

Machotka, P. ( 1982 ). Esthetic judgment warm and cool: Cognitive and affective determinants . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 100 – 107 .

Google Scholar Crossref

Martindale, C. ( 1996 ). A note on the relationship between prototypicality and preference . Empirical Studies of the Arts, 14, 109 – 113 .

Google Scholar

Martindale, C. , & Moore, K. ( 1988 ). Priming, prototypicality, and preference . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 661 – 670 .

Google Scholar Crossref | ISI

McCrae, R. R. ( 1987 ). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258 – 1261 .

Google Scholar Crossref | ISI

Miller, G. F. ( 2000 ). The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. New York : Doubleday .

Google Scholar

Miller, G. F. ( 2001 ). Aesthetic fitness: How sexual selection shaped artistic virtuosity as a fitness indicator and aesthetic preferences as mate choice criteria . Bulletin of Psychology and the Arts, 2, 20 – 25 .

Google Scholar

Nicki, R. M. , & Moss, V. ( 1975 ). Preference for non-representational art as a function of various measures of complexity . Canadian Journal of Psychology, 29, 237 – 249 .

Google Scholar Crossref | ISI

Orians, G. H. ( 2001 ). An evolutionary perspective on aesthetics . Bulletin of Psychology and the Arts, 2, 25 – 29 .

Google Scholar

Orians, G. H. , & Heerwagen, J. H. ( 1992 ). Evolved responses to landscapes . In Barkow, J. H. and Cosmides, L. (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 555 – 579 ). New York : Oxford University Press .

Google Scholar

Osborne, J. W. , & Farley, F. H. ( 1970 ). The relationship between aesthetic preference and visual complexity in abstract art . Psychonomic Science, 19, 69 – 70 .

Google Scholar Crossref

Power, C. ( 1999 ). “Beauty magic”: The origins of art . In Dunbar, R., Knight, C., & Power, C. (Eds.), The evolution of culture (pp. 92 – 112 ). New Brunswick, NJ : Rutgers University Press .

Google Scholar

Rawlings, D. ( 2000 ). The interaction of openness to experience and schizotypy in predicting preference for abstract and violent paintings . Empirical Studies of the Arts, 18, 69 – 91 .

Google Scholar SAGE Journals

Rawlings, D., Barrantes i Vidal, N., & Furnham, A. ( 2001 ). Personality and aesthetic preferences in Spain and England: Two studies relating sensation seeking and openness to experience to liking for paintings and music . European Journal of Personality, 14, 553 – 576 .

Google Scholar Crossref | ISI

Rawlings, D., Twomey, F., Burns, E., & Morris, S. ( 1998 ). Personality, creativity, and aesthetic preference: Comparing psychoticism, sensation seeking, schizotypy, and openness to experience . Empirical Studies of the Arts, 16, 153 – 178 .

Google Scholar SAGE Journals

Rothbart, M., Ahadi, S., & Evans, D. ( 2000 ). Temperament and personality: Origins and outcomes . Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 78, 122 – 135 .

Google Scholar Crossref | Medline | ISI

Thomas, A. , & Chess, S. ( 1977 ). Temperament and development. New York : Brunner/Mazel .

Google Scholar

Thornhill, R. ( 1998 ). Darwinian aesthetics . In Crawford, C. B. & Krebs, D. L. (Eds.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology: Ideas, issues, and applications (pp. 543 – 572 ). Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum .

Google Scholar

Tooby, J. , & Cosmides, L. ( 2001 ). Does beauty build adapted minds? Toward an evolutionary theory of aesthetics, fiction, and the arts . SubStance, 30, 6 – 27 .

Google Scholar

Wilson, G. D., Ausman, J., & Mathews, T. R. ( 1973 ). Conservatism and art preferences . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 286 – 288 .

Google Scholar Crossref | Medline | ISI

Zahavi, A. , & Zahavi, A. ( 1997 ). The handicap principle: A missing piece of Darwin's puzzle. New York : Oxford University Press .

Google Scholar

Zajonc, R. B. ( 1968 ). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 1 – 27 .

Google Scholar Crossref | Medline | ISI

Zuckerman, M. ( 1979 ). Sensation seeking: Beyond the optimal level of arousal. Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum .

Google Scholar

Zuckerman, M. ( 1994 ). Manual with scoring keys and forms for Form V of the Senation Seeking Scale (SSS-V). Newark, DE : University of Delaware .

Google Scholar

Zuckerman, M., Eysenck, S. B., & Eysenck, H. J. ( 1978 ). Sensation seeking in England and America: Cross-cultural, age, and sex comparisons . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 139 – 149 .

Google Scholar Crossref | Medline | ISI

Zuckerman, M., Neary, R. S., & Brustman, B. A. ( 1970 ). Sensation-seeking scale correlates in experience (smoking, drugs, alcohol, “hallucinations,” and sex) and preference for complexity (designs) . Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the APA, 5(1), 317 – 318 .

Google Scholar