I'm not wrong about anything. In fact, I wasn't even the one making the wrongful assertions, here. It's you who's been doing it, not me.



For starters, it seems as though you don't fully understant what I meant about truths. When I said truths, what I actually meant is the story itself and the truths it was built with. As I said already, anything a person creates are formed through the truths within their own hearts in order to become a truth itself. Thus, no matter what the story is, no matter its contents a story is a reflection of what's really going on within your own mind.



Why is it possible for a story to be considered as bad? Why is it possible for a story to be louded as a masterpiece? Heck, how come stories formed through conventions seem tk be entirely mechanical? The way a story reflects your true thoughts is a huge contributing factor as to the wuality of your work.



When I said "dodgy truths", I did not mean that the truths of the story were formed for the ourpoce of deception. In fact, even a false truth can have strong foundations, making them near indisguinishable from a real truth. Rather, whe I said that the truths were dodgy, what I really meant was that it was formed through dodgy foundations, formed through truths already known for contradicting what has preiously been established. Dodgy truths were the reason why terms like "Jumping the Sharks" came to be in the first place.



Your emotiona do not determine the lifelihood of a work. It's the truths of the heart that do. In fact, your emotions have nothing to do with the truths of your heart, and can actually hamper the story if your emotions are written into it. Emotions are the states of mind that form in response to your thoughts, They are not the thoughts themselves.



What I was saying, and what I'm saying right now. This is what I really think about the story itself. If you're not of the type not willing to listen... that'll mean you're also not the type to accept attempts at constructive criticism. Therefore, asking me what I thonk would be useless in that regard.



(And by the way, this has never beem about the clarity within your work. Even when I first started the "argument", when I claimed that the spell was formed through dodgy truths. I did not say that because I believed it was unclear. Quite the opposite, actually.)