Several filings were unsealed Wednesday in the dispute over the lack of transparency in the secret grand jury case brought by a witness subpoenaed by special counsel Robert Mueller.

The filings unsealed Wednesday revealed more about the back-and-forth between prosecutors and the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, which sued to unseal court documents and details about the grand jury case.

An appellate court also on Wednesday ordered that “Company A,” the unidentified foreign-owned corporation that is fighting Mueller’s subpoena, submit by next week proposed redactions for currently sealed court filings in the underlying grand jury case, meaning more will likely be revealed soon about the closely-watched subpoena fight.

Since reporters picked up on hints last fall that Mueller may be linked to the sealed case, details about it out have come out slowly. Courts so far have held up Mueller’s subpoena, and the company — having been held in contempt and facing a steep fine — has taken its fight to the Supreme Court.

Much of the filings unsealed Wednesday deal with the procedural minutia of the transparency lawsuit that the Reporters Committee brought. For instance, one of the freshly unsealed government filings is a “Motion of the United States to Unseal the Response of the United States to Motion to Unseal.”

However, the unsealed government filings reveal the identities of other prosecutors signed on to the briefings not previously known to be involved in the matter. Members of Mueller’s team, as well as attorneys in the U.S. Attorneys Office of D.C. are listed on the filings.

BREAKING: In DC Circuit filing by the government, a full list of lawyers involved in the grand jury dispute — from the special counsel’s office and the US Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia — are revealed for the first time. pic.twitter.com/jgbQYFwPdv — Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner) February 13, 2019

The unsealed filings illuminated some of the fault lines between between the Reporters Committee, which is pushing for transparency, and the government, which has agreed to allow some filings in the grand jury case to be released publicly with redactions.

The Reporters Committee repeatedly argued that the identity of Company A should be allowed to be made public. In an unsealed filing from January 28, the group pointed to an email exchange its lawyers were on with prosecutors and with the company’s attorney. The government cc’d the company’s attorney when sending the Reporters Committee a court filing.