On Monday, Politico’s Ben White and Katie Glueck reported that Wall Street is becoming increasingly concerned at the idea of Senator Rand Paul in the White House. Paul has been barnstorming around the country promoting his “Audit the Fed” bill and making ignorant statement after ignorant statement about monetary policy. His libertarian audience has eaten it up, which has only reinforced the fear that Paul is a real threat to the economy.

But he's not the only Republican that Wall Street should worry about. While the Kentucky senator has the most dangerous economic views of any 2016 candidate, thanks to his rabid disdain for the Fed, his views aren't that different from the GOP establishment or the rest of the primary field.

Consider Texas Senator Ted Cruz, a major supporter of Paul’s “Audit the Fed” bill. “Enough is enough,” Cruz said in a statement in January. “The Federal Reserve needs to fully open its books so Congress and the American people can see what has been going. This is a crucial first step to getting back to a more stable dollar and a healthy economy for the long term.” In 2012, just after he was elected to the Senate, Cruz gave a speech in which he worried about the debasement of the dollar. “We've seen the cost of living for those struggling to climb the economic ladder get higher and higher and higher,” he said. “And every bit as problematic, the savings and investments of those people climbing the ladders have been devalued.” That’s nonsense: Core inflation, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, has been below 3 percent for almost 20 years and, right now, deflation—falling prices—is a much larger concern than inflation is.

“Audit the Fed” has 29 other co-sponsors besides Cruz—one Democrat and 28 Republicans, including Florida Senator Marco Rubio. Rubio has been quiet about monetary policy during his political career, and avoided the topic altogether in his recent, policy-heavy book. But Rubio touched on it in 2012. “The arbitrary way in which interest rates and our currency are treated is yet another cause of unpredictability injected into our economy,” Rubio said at the Jack Kemp Foundation Dinner. “The Federal Reserve Board should publish and follow a clear monetary rule—to provide greater stability about prices and what the value of a dollar will be over time.” Those comments echo many speeches Paul and Cruz have given over the years.

But as National Review’s Reihan Salam posited at the time, they are also not inconsistent with the arguments many conservative economists have made for nominal GDP targeting, in which the Federal Reserve conducts monetary policy so that nominal growth increases at the same rate each year. NGDP targeting, as it is known, has garnered support from economists on the left and right over the past few years, but has yet to be endorsed by a major politician. If Rubio were to endorse it, it would represent a major break with traditional Republican monetary policy (and a smaller, but still significant break with Democratic monetary policy). It would also give him a far more coherent and smart economic platform than any GOP candidate. Yet, it’s hard to imagine Rubio explicitly supporting NGDP targeting, at least in the primary, since it would be a huge political risk (conservative primary voters are very receptive to Rand Paul’s views).