Newly released Cabinet papers reveal John Major told his ministers to avoid attending a “jamboree” for Rupert Murdoch, only to have his home secretary Michael Howard go anyway after refusing to catch a “diplomatic cold” as a polite excuse for not turning up.

Mr Howard was at the time suspected of being one of the “bastards” referred to by Mr Major while venting his frustrations about three unnamed Eurosceptic cabinet ministers in off-the-record remarks picked up by TV microphones in July 1993.

Mr Major also knew the Murdoch-owned Sun had backed Mr Howard during the bastards controversy, saying his “gut instinct for the way ordinary people think” made him a contender for the tabloid’s preferred candidate for prime minister.

The same editorial had called Mr Major a “spiteful political pigmy”, while an accompanying Richard Littlejohn column suggested the then prime minister had a secret double life as: “A traffic warden called Eric Blenkinsop, living a lonely existence in a bed-sit in Scunthorpe, with only his three cats and his subscription to Health and Efficiency for company”.

Both articles were among a bundle of unflattering cuttings sent to Mr Major by his press secretary Gus O’Donnell ahead of a meeting with Mr Murdoch on 19 August 1993.

Michael Howard eventually became leader of the Conservative Party (Reuters)

When two weeks later Mr Howard attended Mr Murdoch’s jamboree, which was timed to coincide with the launch of nine new Sky TV channels, it attracted comment from Mr Major’s private secretary Roderic Lyne.

“You decided we should discourage cabinet ministers from attending Rupert Murdoch’s 1 September jamboree,” Mr Lyne wrote to Mr Major. “When I had a quiet word with the home secretary’s office, they told me he had already accepted the invitation.

“I suggested the he might catch a diplomatic chill. He evidently decided otherwise.”

“Far be it for me to judge,” added Mr Lyne. “His attendance at the dinner was noted, see attached front page article from the [Murdoch-owned] Times, but not hugely exploited.”

Brexit: 10 of the most ridiculous headlines Show all 10 1 /10 Brexit: 10 of the most ridiculous headlines Brexit: 10 of the most ridiculous headlines The Sun, March 9 2016 This wholly false headline merited the first ruling by IPSO (the press regulator) under clause 1 of the revised Editor's Code of Practice. Clause 1 makes specific reference to newspapers printing "headlines not supported by the text" Brexit: 10 of the most ridiculous headlines Daily Mail, November 4 2016 In perhaps the most notorious front page of the past few years, the Mail derides the High Court judges who ruled that parliament must have a vote on whether to trigger article 50 and start the Brexit process Brexit: 10 of the most ridiculous headlines Daily Express, November 4 2016 In the Express' take on the same story, they manage to incorporate the Union Jack, allude to First World War propaganda, invoke memories of Churchill and, of course, state "Brexit means Brexit" Brexit: 10 of the most ridiculous headlines The Sun, March 29 2017 The Sun marked the day on which Mrs May triggered article 50 by projecting a huge and terrible pun on to the Cliffs of Dover Brexit: 10 of the most ridiculous headlines The Sun, April 4 2017 Referencing their notorious eurosceptic headline from 1990 (See: Up Yours Delors), the Sun stokes the flames of the brief Gibraltar dispute, a dispute in which Spain, the supposed aggressors, only joined to note that there was "no need for it" Brexit: 10 of the most ridiculous headlines Daily Mail, April 19 2017 This headline followed Mrs May's snap election announcement, which gave the Mail hope that dissenting opinions on Brexit would disappear Brexit: 10 of the most ridiculous headlines Daily Mail, December 14 2017 In recent months, the Mail has often forgone catchy headlines in favour of rambling rants, this is an early example aimed at Tory Brexit rebels Brexit: 10 of the most ridiculous headlines Daily Mail, January 31 2018 This headline (?) takes aim at the Lords over their repeated amendments to the EU Withdrawal Bill Brexit: 10 of the most ridiculous headlines The Sun, June 12 2018 On the day that the EU Withdrawal Bill is to be debated in the Commons, the Sun offers two choices to MPs, desperately including all conceivable imagery that might make Brits feel patriotic, which apparently includes the Loch Ness Monster Brexit: 10 of the most ridiculous headlines Daily Express, June 12 2018 On the same day, the Express lets MPs know what the consequences of the vote may be

In a handwritten note written to Mr Major on the eve of the jamboree, Mr Howard explained his attendance by saying: “On Thursday morning I am due to give a press conference on press privatisation. So any ‘chill’ would be very conspicuously ‘diplomatic’. There would be an obvious risk of comment speculation.”

Mr Howard added: “More fundamentally this does raise the question of what tactics we should adopt towards the Murdoch press.

“I hope I need hardly say I fully share your dismay at their behaviour since the [1992] election.

“But we shall need them at the next election. And given the unpalatable (to them) nature of some of the things we are likely to be doing quite soon – Calcutt [recommendations on press self-regulation], VAT [on newspapers] – the case for some harmless costless gesture such as attending a dinner seems to be quite strong.”

Despite former minister Ann Widdecombe telling the Commons there was “something of the night about him” in May 1997, Mr Howard went on to become Conservative Party leader in 2003.

The newly released files, now in the National Archives at Kew, offer fresh detail on the Major government’s tortured relationship with the Murdoch empire. They show officials describing the Murdoch papers as irrational while still hoping for helpful coverage, including from the tabloid that after the 1992 election had claimed: “It’s The Sun wot won it”.

'God alone knows what Kelvin tells him' wrote one civil servant of The Sun editor's near-daily chats with proprietor Rupert Murdoch (Getty)

Briefing the prime minister ahead of his August 1993 meeting with Mr Murdoch, Mr O’Donnell wrote: “I was surprised to learn, given the worldwide scale of his business, that he phones [Sun editor] Kelvin MacKenzie most days to keep up to date with the British scene.

“God alone knows what Kelvin tells him, as he is often very poorly informed.”

At a time when Mr Major was trying to hold together a 21-seat majority in the teeth of rebellions by his more right-wing and Eurosceptic MPs, Mr O’Donnell advised the prime minister to tell the media tycoon: “Your papers have made matters worse.

“They have ceased to make rational criticisms of policy. They are now simply anti-everything and anti-me in particular.

“This is bad for economic confidence and hence, bad for business.”

Seeming to inject an element of threat into what Mr Major should say, Mr O’Donnell added: “Conservative MPs now see no reason to be helpful to media. (Pressure growing over privacy rules, VAT on newspapers, cross-ownership. I am not keen to move on any of these areas but MPs from all parties becoming increasingly attracted to them.)”

The 1993 meeting with Mr Murdoch occurred almost a year after Black Wednesday, 16 September 1992, when the UK crashed out of the European Exchange Rate Mechanism.

According to Mr Mackenzie, when Mr Major phoned to ask how The Sun would be covering that day’s chaos, he replied: “Well, John, let me put it this way - I’ve got a large bucket of shit lying on my desk and tomorrow morning I’m going to pour it all over your head.”

Twenty years later the former prime minister told the Leveson Inquiry that Mr MacKenzie’s account of the phone call had caused him “a degree of wonder and surprise” because “I frankly can’t recall the bit that has entered mythology”.

John Major as prime minister in the Nineties. He later admitted: 'I was much too sensitive from time to time about what the press wrote.' (PA)

Mr Major did, however, admit: “I was much too sensitive from time to time about what the press wrote. It was a basic human emotion to get a bit ratty about it.

“The press to me at the time was a source of wonder. I woke up each morning and I opened the morning papers and I learned what I thought, what I didn’t think, what I said, what I hadn’t said, what I was about to do, what I wasn’t about to do.”

Support free-thinking journalism and attend Independent events

Sir John told the Leveson Inquiry that he met Mr Murdoch three times while prime minister: in 1992, 1993 and just before the 1997 election.

“It was suggested to me I ought to try to make some effort to get closer to the Murdoch papers,” he said of the February 1997 meeting. “I agreed I would invite Mr Murdoch to dinner.

“It is not often someone sits in front of a prime minister and says to a prime minister ‘I would like you to change your policy or my organisation cannot support you.'”