Former Vice President Jejomar Binay Sr. arrived at the Sandiganbayan on Friday to post bail for malversation, graft and falsification of public document charges over the P2.28-billion Makati car park building anomaly.

Wearing a light blue polo shirt and flanked by his security aide and lawyers, Binay Sr. arrived at the anti-graft court Third Division around 2 p.m. after the court decided to consolidate Binay Sr.’s charges with the ongoing case of his son, dismissed Makati mayor Jejomar “Junjun” Binay Jr., who was earlier charged with graft and falsification of public document raps for the phases IV and V construction of the building.

ADVERTISEMENT

READ: Junjun Binay charged with graft, document falsification over carpark building

He was accompanied by his son Binay Jr., his co-accused in the malversation and graft charges.

After undergoing the usual booking procedure, he proceeded for a courtesy visit to the office of Sandiganbayan Presiding Justice Amparo Cabotaje Tang, who vowed that the court would not be swayed by politics but would base its decisions on the evidence presented. Tang chairs the third division which would hear the Binay cases.

READ: Sandiganbayan assures Binay it won’t be swayed by politics

Both Binay Sr. and Jr. refused interviews with the media.

While Binay Sr. was charged with rigging the first three phases of the building when he was Makati mayor, Binay Jr. was charged for phases IV and V of the building when he succeeded his father in the city hall.

Binay Sr. on Thursday was charged with one count of malversation or violation of Article 217 of the Revised Penal Code, four counts of graft or violation of Section 3(e) of Republic Act 3019 or the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act and nine counts of falsification of public documents or violation of Article 171 of the Revised Penal Code against the former Vice President, who lost his presidential bid in the May 9 general elections.

Binay Sr. paid a total of P376,000 bail bond for all his charges—P40,000 for malversation, P30,000 for each count of graft and P24,000 for each count of falsification of public documents.

Binay Jr. was included as a co-accused in his father’s malversation charge and in the two counts of Binay Sr.’s graft charges. Thus, Binay Jr. also paid his P100,000 bail for his one count of malversation (P40,000 each) and two counts of graft (P30,000 each).

ADVERTISEMENT

Binay Jr. was included as a co-accused in his father’s malversation charge and in the two counts of Binay Sr.’s graft charges. Binay Jr. was earlier charged with graft and falsification of public documents in a separate case.

The charges against the former Vice President were filed when his term ended upon the expiration of his immunity from suit.

READ: Ombudsman finds probable cause to charge VP Binay with graft

Binay Sr. decried political harassment by the Ombudsman to derail his presidential bid, saying that he could not be investigated because he was immune from suit. The Ombudsman said it would file the charges only after his immunity from suit ends.

READ: Binay appeals graft indictment, says it’s meant to ruin 2016 run

According to the charge sheet, Binay Jr. and Sr. face a malversation charge for misappropriating P11.011 million as payment to Mana Architectural and Interior Design (MANA) for the architectural design of the building and dispensing with public bidding to enter into a negotiated contract with MANA.

In its resolution finding probable cause against the two, the Ombudsman said the documents showed that Binay Jr. and Sr. had approved the Bids and Awards Committee (BAC) resolutions, notices of awards, contracts and payments using unnumbered/undated disbursement vouchers and obligation requests despite glaring procurement violations.

The Binays released the payment to MANA despite its failure to submit the approved plans and specifications for the construction of the Makati car park building.

Binay Sr. also faces four counts of graft for causing injury to government and giving undue advantage to MANA, the winning firm for the architectural design and Hilmarc’s Construction, the firm for the construction of the building which started in 2007.

Binay Sr. and Binay Jr. were charged with one count of graft each for acting with manifest partiality, evident bad faith and gross inexcusable negligence when he awarded the design contract to MANA despite violations of procurement laws and failure to deliver the approved plans and specifications.

Binay Sr. was charged with three more counts of graft for giving undue advantage to Hilmarc’s for the first three phases of construction. Binay Jr. was charged for awarding the contract to Hilmarc’s in connection with the third phase.

The prosecution said Binay Sr. entered into a contract with Hilmarc’s despite the absence of accepted and approved plans and specifications of the project.

Binay Sr. then allegedly rigged the bidding for the phase I construction worth P386.998 million, phase II construction worth P499.357 million and phase III construction worth P599.395 million despite the absence of an approved appropriation for the project and through a simulated bidding.

“(The Binays) caused undue injury to the government by depriving Makati city of the opportunity to obtain the most advantageous offer for the project,” the prosecution said.

In connection with the falsification charges, Binay Sr. allegedly conspired with the city administrator and BAC members in falsifying two 2007 issues of the newspaper “Balita,” one 2008 issue, and another 2009 issue to make it appear that invitations to apply for eligibility and to bid (IAETB) were published “when in truth and in fact… said publisher did not do so, and no such IAETB was published.”

He was also accused of fabricating affidavits of publication to make it appear that the publisher authorized the publication of invitations to bid when in fact there were none.

He was also charged with allegedly falsifying the unnumbered BAC resolutions declaring Hilmarc’s as the bidder with the lowest calculated bid for the first three phases of construction.

The resolutions made it appear that invitations to bid were published and a public bidding was conducted although these were “untruthful statements” embodied in the statement of facts of the resolution.

The Ombudsman earlier noted the following anomalies—the BAC completed the procurement process for the building with undue haste or only 11 days; the procurement for the construction was awarded to Hilmarc’s Construction despite lack of invitations to bid with Hilmarc’s as lone bidder in four phases of the project; the construction also began despite the absence or approved design standards, contract plans, agency cost estimates, detailed engineering and programs of work; and the city officials and Hilmarc’s colluded to rig the public biddings.

The following city officials charged over the car park anomaly have also paid their bail bond: city administrator Marjorie De Veyra, legal officer Pio Kenneth Dasal, budget officer Lorenza Amores, central planning chief Virginia Hernandez, central planning management officer chief Line Dela Peña, BAC committee chair Giovanni Condes, BAC vice chair Ulysses Orienza, BAC secretariat Manolito Uyaco, BAC technical working group chair Rodel Nayve, city engineer Arnel Cadangan, civil engineer Emerito Magat, city treasurer Nelia Barlis, city accountants Cecilio Lim III, acting city accountant Raydes Pestaño, general services department official Norman Flores and Efren Canlas of Hilmarc’s Construction Company (Hilmarc’s).

The other accused who remain at large are city engineer Mario Badillo, city accountant Leonila Querijero, and Orlando Mateo from MANA.

Ombudsman Conchita Carpio-Morales in an earlier interview said the office was still investigating Binay Sr. for plunder, a non-bailable offense of earning at least P50 million in ill-gotten wealth.

The former Vice President was the subject of a yearlong Senate blue ribbon investigation into the allegations of kickbacks from overpriced infrastructure deals in Makati.

Binay Jr. has been dismissed and perpetually barred from public office in connection with his administrative offense for misconduct and dishonesty in connection with the alleged offense.

In a statement, Binay Sr.’s lawyer Daniel Subido said the former vice president is “eager to go to court to prove the grave abuses of the Ombudsman and have these frivolous cases dismissed.”

Subido said the Ombudsman violated Binay’s constitutional rights because the information filed against him does not state any specific criminal act other than a “tenuous conclusion of conspiracy.”

He lamented the trial by publicity being perpetrated by the Ombudsman against Binay.

“Even the prosecutors of the Ombudsman sought clarification from the latter regarding the previous cases filed against the Makati officials. This shows the sloppiness of the work done by the Ombudsman in her attempt to maliciously indict the Binays by way of trial by publicity,” Subido said.

He noted that even the Commission on Audit has not issued any notice of disallowance on the anomalous car park building. RAM/rga

Read Next

EDITORS' PICK

MOST READ