It’s election-eve, and so-called “whistle blowing” website WikiLeaks has played a huge role in this year’s election cycle. As of the evening of November 7, election-eve, Wikileaks has ramped up its foray into politics with yet another Clinton-slamming email dump. If you’re keeping count, you know that equals 34 Wikileaks email dumps this election cycle, and two today alone.

One of the biggest election-eve WikiLeaks stunners has been the unwavering argument from Julian Assange and company that the U.S. election is akin to a massive farce. A dog and pony show in which presidents are selected (and not by the American voters) rather than elected. As YourNewsWire reported, even before election-eve, WikiLeaks has stood by its claim that there is no U.S. election in truth. Just a bunch of smoke and mirrors.

And the practice of American’s being duped into believing that they’ve chosen their own president, claims WikiLeaks, has been the norm well before Clinton vs. Trump 2016.

There is no US election. There is power consolidation. Rigged primary, rigged media and rigged 'pied piper' candidate drive consolidation. — WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) October 21, 2016

WikiLeaks has been a divisive factor in this years general election, something that’s been a fact leading up to this long-awaited and controversial election-eve. As the organization has continued to dump more and more anti-Clinton email batches (the Julian Assange-led group has dubbed them “The Podesta Emails”), it has found itself under fire from people and organizations that don’t appreciate the group’s “meddling.”

After one such email dump, when WikiLeaks let loose a bunch of President Obama’s personal emails, the organization was accused of “picking a side” in the U.S. election. WikiLeaks’ response? Check it out, per WikiLeaks on Twitter, where the exchange took place.

@dangillmor What election? It has been clear from the beginning who is going to win. This is, in effect, a power consolidation exercise. — WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) October 20, 2016

For a while, it seemed that WikiLeaks (which has been spouting the same “rigged election” line as Republican candidate Donald Trump) may have gotten it wrong. After taking a trouncing at the debates, Donald Trump began to pick up steam again following the news that the Hillary Clinton’s email scandal had blown up once again. The polls began to swing in Trump’s favor, and undecided voters seemed increasingly likely to decide on the “Trump train.”

Then came Sunday, November 6. That’s the day, repored Fox News, that FBI Director James Comey made the shock and awe announcement that he and his bureau had reviewed 650,000 Clinton-related emails in the previous eight days and that he was standing behind the FBI’s previous decision not to prosecute Hillary Clinton. The close presidential race flipped one more time, a WikiLeaks-predicted election-eve “miracle.” Not surprisingly, Trump responded to the FBI bombshell with accusations and incredulity.

“You can’t review 650,000 emails in 8 days. Now it’s up to the American people to deliver justice at the ballot box on November 8.”

According to WikiLeaks, Clinton has been the chosen candidate the whole time. In fact, WikiLeaks has long contended (and buttressed with leaked emails) that Donald Trump was the opposition candidate of Hillary Clinton’s choosing.

WikiLeaks has further released emails that clearly illustrated that George W. Bush and Barack Obama were secretly very close leading up to Obama’s November 2008 presidential victory. According to WikiLeaks leaked emails, the pair orchestrated a smooth transition of power before votes were ever cast in the 2008 election.

wikileaks exposes that our presidents have been groomed + selected since 1933 — кєℓℓу ♡ (@kellyfreethem) November 5, 2016

We still need a Convention of the States regardless of who wins. Wikileaks exposure of Clinton shows the depth of corruption in DC. — Meta World Data (@Pqlyur1) November 6, 2016

If Hillary Clinton wins after all these Wikileaks I honestly don't understand what the point of an election is — Antonio Povinelli (@AntwanDon7) October 31, 2016

When Clinton wins she will have beaten Trump,his insane followers,the media,the FBI,Putin,GOP traitors and Wikileaks.Sounds impressive to me — Aladdin Sane (@BedfordBootBoy) October 31, 2016

Reportedly, well before election-eve 2008, Bush and Obama had been in repeated contact. A WikiLeaks leaked memo clearly states that all parties involved knew that such a lengthy pre-election relationship was bizarre. Yet, according to WikiLeaks, it happened.

“We are now at the point of deciding how to staff economic policy during the transition, who should be the point of contact with Treasury and how to blend the transition and campaign economic policy talent.

“Normally these decisions could be made after the election, and ideally after the selection of a National Economic Advisor, but, of course, these are not normal times.”

Fast forward eight or so years to election-eve 2016, an election that WikiLeaks has taken an unapologetic side in. According to WikiLeaks (and Trump) same kind of pre-election grooming has already taken place. Because, as WikiLeaks claims, “there is no U.S. election.” Selected not elected, as WikiLeaks likes to say.

For a brief moment, it appeared that Donald Trump was dialing back his claims of a rigged election. Just after the news broke that the FBI was “reopening” the Hillary email investigation, Trump jumped in the polls. It was then, reports Real Clear Politics, that Donald Trump changed his mind about how “rigged” the U.S. election might be, diverging from the WikiLeaks narrative.

“…it might not be as rigged as I thought!”

Now that Hillary Clinton is back in the lead, though, in the aftermath the wholly unexpected FBI announcement that the agency isn’t pursuing her prosecution, Trump has changed his tune on election-eve, and WikiLeaks might just be proven right, reports Sputnik News.

“The system is rigged, at least we know it, people have never known it so obviously as they do now.”

As WikiLeaks has been saying throughout the election cycle, up ’til election-eve, Donald Trump may have a point. But that point is appearing less and less likely to help him secure the White House tomorrow.

The newest electoral maps and polls show a clear Clinton lead, almost across the board.

Final national NBC/WSJ poll of '16 race

Clinton 44

Trump 40

Johnson 6

Stein 2



2way

Clinton 48

Trump 43



Nov 3-5, MOE +/- 2.7 — Mark Murray (@mmurraypolitics) November 6, 2016

LATimes, whose poll w/ USC Dornsife has consistently shown good numbers for Trump, now sees Clinton winning 352 EVs! https://t.co/voe2n3y9Ps — Jim Roberts (@nycjim) November 7, 2016

Roughly 24 hours from now, election results should be rolling in, and the American public should know whether the latest polls are correct. What do you think on election-eve? Can Donald Trump pull off a win? Or will we have a Madame President Clinton? Would a Clinton win prove WikLeaks’ election-eve predictions and warnings right?

[Featured Image by 360b/Shutterstock]