National security adviser Robert O’Brien said Sunday that U.S. embassies were not alerted or evacuated due to the “imminent threat” of an attack because “we’re not going to cut and run every time somebody threatens us.”

ABC "This Week" host George Stephanopoulos George Robert StephanopoulosTrump ABC town hall pulls in fewer viewers than 'America's Got Talent,' NBA, Fox News The Hill's Morning Report - Sponsored by The Air Line Pilots Association - Trump contradicts CDC director on vaccine, masks The Memo: Warning signs flash for Trump on debates MORE pressed O'Brien about the intelligence purportedly showing an imminent threat to Americans and asked why the administration didn't evacuate U.S. embassies in the region.

“I can tell you with respect to other embassies in the region, we’ve taken very reasonable security precautions there, and it’s something we monitor all the time,” O'Brien said.

O’Brien said President Trump Donald John TrumpHR McMaster says president's policy to withdraw troops from Afghanistan is 'unwise' Cast of 'Parks and Rec' reunite for virtual town hall to address Wisconsin voters Biden says Trump should step down over coronavirus response MORE was “decisive” and noted the administration’s decision to send troops in reaction to the protests at the U.S. embassy in Baghdad last month.

Pressed on why embassies allegedly targeted by Iran's Gen. Soleimani weren't alerted or evacuated, national security adviser Robert O'Brien: "We're not going to cut and run every time somebody threatens us...we're not going to have another Benghazi." https://t.co/A9mOySQrdm pic.twitter.com/EczuftS6kr — This Week (@ThisWeekABC) January 12, 2020

He contrasted the Trump administration’s reaction to what happened at the U.S. embassy in Tehran in 1979, resulting in the Iranian hostage crisis, and in Benghazi, Libya, in 2012.

The adviser added he would like to release the intelligence that justified the killing of Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani but added it wouldn’t be best in the long-term.

“I’d love to release the intelligence,” he said. “The reason we don’t, George, is because that same intelligence, those same streams and channels, are what allow us to protect Americans going forward.”

“So rather than have a short-term political win, release the intelligence and say, ‘I told you so,’ we want to keep the American people safe going forward,” O’Brien added.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Trump administration has fallen under scrutiny after a U.S. strike killed Soleimani. The administration has claimed there was evidence the general was conducting an “imminent attack” on Americans but has declined to release further details, even to congressional members.

Sens. Rand Paul Randal (Rand) Howard PaulSecond GOP senator to quarantine after exposure to coronavirus GOP senator to quarantine after coronavirus exposure The Hill's Morning Report - Sponsored by National Industries for the Blind - Trump seeks to flip 'Rage' narrative; Dems block COVID-19 bill MORE (R-Ky.) and Mike Lee Michael (Mike) Shumway LeeMcConnell shores up GOP support for coronavirus package McConnell tries to unify GOP Davis: The Hall of Shame for GOP senators who remain silent on Donald Trump MORE (R-Utah), as well as many Democrats, condemned the administration for its briefing on the attack, saying the intelligence was lacking.

The killing of Soleimani prompted Iran to strike Iraqi bases hosting U.S. troops last week. President Trump has said it seems like Iran is stepping down its attacks.