As most of the United States saw last night, the second presidential debate was co moderated. One of the moderators was ABC News Chief Global Affairs Correspondent Martha Raddatz. The other was Anderson Cooper, from CNN.

Raddatz was actually involved in the 2008 election cycle. During that cycle there was a major story about how then-Senator Barack Obama was involved with some collusion with the Association of Community Organizations for Reform, also known as ACORN.

Raddatz initially showed some interest in that story. It was juicy, had some evidence to be backed up, and could have changed the entire 2008 election. So what happened? Raddatz refused to publish a story on it!

Anita Moncrief, who was the eventual ACORN whistleblower, told Breitbart News that she had met with Raddatz’s producer Avni Patel in 2008. Both Patel and Raddatz were given evidence that showed the collusion between Obama and ACRON.

The evidence included personal accounts of the collusion between the Obama campaign and ACORN in October of 2008, a month before the election. This would have easily changed the outcome of the election, considering that it occurred literally a month before Election Day.

Except these two refused to report on it until AFTER the election. Moncrief went to the two news producers because they had the power to literally change the election outcome. During that time the public didn’t know the depth of the scandal. If Raddatz had decided to run with it, then the public would have been better informed and it could have swayed a lot of votes.

So what happened? According to Moncrief’s account, she met with Raddatz’s producer in Washington in an hour-long meeting in a coffee shop in Washington, D.C. After the meeting, Moncrief had received an email from Patel.

“Anita, It was good talking to you today. I look forward to learning more, and taking a look at those documents you mentioned. It sounds like the easiest way to get those from you would be to directly download the files from your web-transfer site. If that doesn’t work, you can try to send them to my gmail account.”

Moncrief was told that ABC News was going to broadcast the report. “They were very excited. They said they were willing to run the story.” Moncrief then sent documents two separate times, once on October 14, 2008, and again on October 26, 2008. Those dates were very close to the election, so they would have had a huge impact on it.

ABC News received the documents and acknowledged that they had gotten it. The documents spelled out specific instances of collusion between the Obama campaign and named individuals at ACORN and Project Vote. This would have ousted Moncrief as her name was on it. However she included that to prove that she was who she said she was.

What happened was the Obama campaign passed to ACORN and its sister entity Project Vote the campaign’s full donor list. It was different from the limited list of contributors the campaign filed with the Federal Election Commission, which didn’t include small-dollar donors. However because ACORN and Project Vote are considered non-profits, they are prohibited from coordinating with a candidate’s committee.

Originally Moncrief had been working with the New York Times and Stephanie Strom about this cooperation. Strom’s articles were using the information given, but they weren’t describing the cooperation, which was frustrating Moncrief. Later she become close with attorney and columnist Michael Gaynor.

The two decided that the Times wasn’t going to do what she wanted so they started thinking of other news outlets. Eventually they settled on Raddatz and ABC News. What they didn’t know was that Raddatz has a history of undisclosed associations with Democrats that affects her ability to be impartial.

But the news outlets have had a history of letting impartial people be associated with the Democratic elections. Raddatz was the moderator in the 2012 vice presidential debate between Joe Biden and Paul Ryan. But Raddatz didn’t tell viewers that President Obama had attended her wedding, thereby having a serious conflict of interest.

She was confronted about her failure to disclose that after Obama won reelection. She said, “I didn’t do anything. I mean, I didn’t have to handle that. It was—and I’m really not going to comment about that. That was something that happened two days before the debate. It had been in the New York Times quite a while before that, I believe. I just got to put this out of my head. That had nothing to do with what I did at the debate. Nothing.”

But this wasn’t the first time that ABC News covered up a story about a Democrat before the election. There was another incident that involved United States Senator Bob Menendez. They had a chance to break part of the scandal that Menendez had underpaid prostitutes in the Dominican Republic.

When Raddatz had Menendez on her program after the election and the scandal in full swing, she didn’t ask him about it. ABC News also attempted to undermine several of the prostitutes, but they turned out to be true.

All of this means that ABC News and everyone associated there will not show any news that would potentially hurt Democrats. They have shown it time and time again. Not only that, but some of their anchors are being selected to moderate key presidential debates. That is just something that shouldn’t happen!

Share this article to show that one of the moderators of the debate has been involved in several Democrat scandals but has refused to air them. This means that anything she says or does with the Democrats should be looked at suspiciously, because you never know if she is covering something up.

That means that any story on Clinton will have some truths withheld from it. That isn’t something that the country needs. So to combat it, go out and vote for Donald Trump. He will put an end to the media’s connections with the Democratic Party.