Brilliant Arken, it is not a rocket stage as some might suggest due to the fact it is not rotating or out of control but appears to be stable in its orbit and parallel to the earths horizon, this is a UFO of some kind and I think they have been around for a very long time myself and the ruined objects I think of as human in origin on the moon and mars make me wonder if perhaps we were the losers in a war of some kind.Here is one image Arken of such a structure on the moon (this is for Arken and I have posted eleswhere,The website that posted these was taken down in 2007 but was suppressed from about 2005 onward, here is an excerpt from the page on which this was posted.Trouble at Geology Station 6We have concluded that the object in the photograph (roughly four times the size of an Asian Elephant) is not a boulder or a rock, and for that matter its formation had nothing to do with any natural process. It is, in fact, a piece of machinery which has experienced prolonged exposure to the elements and now exists in a state of advancing deterioration. It sits where it stopped moving long ago and is slowly turning to dust. As with many Apollo photographs the evidence indicates this image has been altered.The view of the artifact is roughly from the north. This side would experience to a lesser degree the deteriorating effects of essentially unfiltered solar radiation. A perspective view of the south side of "Tracy’s Rock" is never accurately shown. We will speculate that photographs of the south and down slope images of Tracy’s Rock would, among other things, likely show the two right side legs fallen away and laying on the ground along with other revealing mechanical features including, possibly a view of the ‘guts’ of the rear section. Based on photographic procedures executed by U.S. astronauts we are confident that accurate perspective images of the south side of "Tracy’s Rock" do exist and have been withheld.A panorama of lunar history is captured in this view looking south over the Valley of Taurus Littrow. A huge fragmented boulder had rolled almost a mile down the side of the North Massif to here, Station 6 on our traverse (see here). Our LM and its light area of surface alteration can be seen on the photo about an inch to the right of the top point of the boulder. That's me at the left. Note the marks of my sampling scoop on the debris resting on a slanting surface of the boulder at left. Gene Cernan took the photos from which this mosaic was assembled." The preceding caption was written by Harrison Schmitt. (Labeling of the background Taurus Littrow Valley features has been added. The South Massif seen in the right background is about 5 miles away. (Image courtesy of NASA– labeling added)Although the above digitized mosaic from "Apollo Expeditions to the Moon" consisting of the two frames is of low resolution (62.7 KB) major differences between it and all other available revisions can be discerned. Those frames were AS17-140-21497 – described in the Lunar Surface Journals as- "Station 6 pan (north). Jack, Tracy's Rock, talus sample site, East Massif, Bear Mountain. (Left) & AS17-140-21494 Station 6 pan (north). LRV, South Massif, TGE, Henry, Bear Mountain or similar (right).1- Coloration- (Magazine 140 was color) the pale green appearance of the above frame differs significantly from the labeled frame-21496HR & other revisions. This may be the most accurate color rendition of the Taurus Littrow Valley the public has been allowed to see. The color issue will be later discussed.2- The top of the drive unit- (‘boulder with legs’) is not consistent as shown in partials of the two revisions of AS17-140-21497 (below).3- Left Front Leg- is not consistent as shown in partials of the two revisions of AS17-140-21497 (below).The following thumbs I do have but have not uploaded as they are merely comparisons of the above image and the public release catalogue image comparing the differences, both the official release and the above are NASA in origin but the above has less air brushing done to it.This was in reference to the front of the object (the piece that looks like the early nasa test gliders (probably copied from this with inferior technology in the 1970s and droped from nasa jumbos to test glide performance))(Left) is a reduced copy of a photo detail from the Apollo 17 Science Report. Is "Fragment 1"of the "Large Split Boulder" being treated as a rock or an archeological artifact? (Image Courtesy NASA)So there is definitely stuff up there that is artificial and not fake.Here is another just for you Arken as I know you are searching but be careful there is truth and there are paid debunkers but false evidence is even more harmful than the debunkers, this is the real body on the moon as followsTaken from this shotThis is a crash site/battle site of some kind that is very ancient and the body and remains are indistinguishable as they are in the process of molecular decay (turning to dust) caused by prolonged exposure to hard particle solar radiation and temperature variations.So yes you have a UFO but when we pose a risk to them what will there intentions to us be.