Here’s one I missed from August (while prepping in Portugal):

The Danish Meteorological Institute (DMI) admitted it wrongly reported Greenland’s record summer warmth, in what it called “good news from a climate perspective”…?

The DMI, a key player in monitoring Greenland’s climate, reported a “shocking” early-August temperature of between 2.7C (37F) and 4.7C (40.5F) at the Summit weather station, located some 3,202m above sea level at the center of the Greenland ice sheet.

This news quickly spread to every corner of the left-leaning web, like some nasty EOTW rash. But just a few days later the DMI posted a tweet retracting that record temp, saying that after a “closer look” (whatever that means exactly) it was revealed that the monitoring equipment had been giving “erroneous results”.

“Was there record-level warmth on the inland ice on Friday?” said the institute’s tweet dated Aug 08. “No! A quality check has confirmed out suspicion that the measurement was too high.”





🌡️Var der rekordvarmt på indlandsisen i fredags? Nej! Kvalitetstjek har bekræftet vores formodning om, at målingen var for høj🧐

Temperaturen på Summit var ikke over 0 grader hverken torsdag 1. aug. eller fredag 2. aug. — DMI (@dmidk) August 8, 2019



By combining measurements with observations from other weather stations, the DMI has now estimated that the temperature was more like -2C (28F) — quite a difference, and still only a guess.

“You could say that this is good news from a climate perspective,” Herdis Damberg, one of the Institute’s meteorologists told Danish state broadcaster DR. “There are probably a lot of people wiping their foreheads saying that it’s pretty good that it wasn’t four degrees.”

In my opinion, Damberg is an idiot — an erroneous reading like this is terrible news from a climate perspective. The damage was done almost instantly when hundreds of MSM outlets leaped to publish the bad news without even the sniff of a fact-check. The AGW train must keep on chugging — the mere fact that the DMI reported record-warmth in Greenland –true or otherwise– was no-doubt seen as a gift-from-heaven to all those propagating the climate scare.

Also aiding to prove my point, ZERO retractions of the erroneous record have been issued by the MSM.

The ruse is clearer than ever.

And also, for what it’s worth, the DMI believes that heavy snow (ironically) had caused poor ventilation around the thermometers at the site, wrongly boosting the temperature. The institute still claims the ice sheet is melting away, however, even though every data-point they have clearly contradicts that:







Furthermore, snow cover across the entire Northern Hemisphere is currently, as of Nov 15, at astonishing levels. Very rarely, since GSL records began in 1998, has this much of the Hemisphere been blanketed in the white stuff so early in the season. In addition, the FMI’s Total Snow Mass for the NH chart is tracking at twice the rate of the 1982-2012 average.





NH Snow Cover – Nov 15

NH Snow Mass – Nov 15



Don’t be fooled by bogus political ideologies.

The lower-latitudes are likely refreezing in line with historically low solar activity.

Yes, a few far-northern areas like Alaska and the Arctic are warming –slightly– but 1) no one lives up there so quite frankly, who cares, and 2) as NASA succinctly identify in their ‘Maunder Minimum Temperature Reconstruction Map’ (below), these regions are expected to warm during periods of global cooling, as are the North Atlantic, Iceland and the southern tip of Greenland.

There is now such thing as a ‘global’ climate.





Temp change between 1780 (a year of normal solar activity) and 1680 (a year within the depths of the Maunder Minimum) — NASA.



And regarding any Arctic sea ice melt –and the potential consequences for sea level rise– again, a non-issue — at least 90% of the planet’s ice is safely locked up in Antarctica which, for as long as we can tell, has been steadily advancing, comfortably offsetting the comparatively tiny losses observed at its northern cousin.





NASA has recently revealed this upcoming solar cycle (25) will be “the weakest of the past 200 years,” and they’ve correlated previous solar shutdowns to prolonged periods of global cooling here.







Our future is COLD — prepare accordingly — grow your own.





Social Media channels are restricting Electroverse’s reach — be sure to subscribe to receive new post notifications by email (the box is located in the sidebar >>> or scroll down if on mobile).

And/or become a Patron by clicking here: patreon.com/join/electroverse

Any way you can, help us spread the message so others can survive and thrive in the coming times.





Grand Solar Minimum + Pole Shift

Thanks to Dave for the heads-up.



