117 SHARES Share Tweet

“Working as intended.”

That is how an attorney with the Gifford’s Law Center described Proposition 63, California’s cockamamie ammunition background check system, which in less than six months, has denied over 60,000 Californians their right to purchase ammunition.

That equates to approximately 20% of all ammunition sales being rejected by the California Department of Justice.

So, of course those 60,000 cases must have been violent felons who were forbidden from owning firearms altogether, right?

Wrong.

More than 99% of the denials were false-positives.

People whose only crime was having a change of address, a misspelled name, or simply not being in California’s registry.

These law-abiding Californians were denied their God-given, and constitutionally-guaranteed right to bear arms, and the Gifford’s Law Center boasts that it is “Working as intended.”

All part of the plan

While I don’t often find myself in agreement with the Gifford’s Center, in this situation, we are in total agreement.

This crooked system is working exactly as intended.

The goal of the anti-gun left is, and has always been to impose as many barriers to firearms ownership and operation as possible, until it becomes so inconvenient to exercise our Second Amendment rights, that firearms ownership in the United States simply dries up.

Of course this type of Constitutional infringement is not solely limited to California.

In fact, the same sort of violations have been taking place on the national level for years.

The NICS Gun Registration system, which processes background checks on all commercial firearms transactions also has an abysmal false positive rate of over 90%.

continued 117 SHARES SHARES ShareTweet