Dion Waiters, Cleveland, shooting guard

His contract status: Two years, $9.2 million.

Why it could make sense for the Thunder: Waiters is a young, explosive scorer who is on a terrific rookie scale contract. He could step in as the starter at shooting guard and provide Westbrook and Durant a shooter who also can create his own shot when things break down. At 22, Waiters also is an ideal addition that can grow with and complement the current core for years to come.

Why it could make sense for Cavs: Depending of what you believe, there’s beef between Waiters and star point guard Kyrie Irving. The two might not be able to coexist, and with a recent report that Cleveland is preparing to offer Kyrie a max deal this summer that could be worth upward of $90 million, the Cavs have clearly made their choice. The question is what else the Thunder can offer Cleveland? One of this year’s two first-rounders? One of its young prospects? A future pick or overseas prospect? OKC would have to come up with something, because there are probably plenty of teams that would put together a nice package for Waiters.

The drawback for the Thunder: In addition to being undersized for his position, Waiters (6-4) needs the ball in his hands too much. He had a 26.9 usage rate this season. By comparison, Reggie Jackson was at 22.6. That’s not going to fly on the Thunder. So Waiters either would have to tailor his game or he simply wouldn’t fit.

Do I think it will happen: Probably not.

Jarrett Jack, Cleveland, point guard

His contract status: Three years, $18.9 million (the final year is a team option).

Why it could make sense for the Thunder: Here’s where things could get interesting. But in order for it to happen, it would take some outside-the-box (or, if we want to use Presti’s word, independent) thinking. Jack has been a very solid guard throughout his career. He could be next year’s backup point guard and even pose problems in three-guard lineups with Westbrook and Reggie Jackson. Of course, if this happens Jackson is your starting shooting guard next season, which probably isn’t the preferred route for the Thunder. But in the days of the small ball craze, this might not be a bad idea at all.

Why it could make sense for Cavs: I’ll tell you as soon as I figure out what the Cavs are doing up there. The one possible reason that comes to mind, though, is that with Irving in the fold Cleveland doesn’t need a backup point guard who plays 20-25 minutes a night — especially not if the Cavs are determined to keep Waiters and decide to go with a wing player, either Andrew Wiggins or Jabari Parker, in the draft. Parting with Jack frees up plenty of minutes and allows Cleveland to get a much cheaper player at that spot.

The drawback for the Thunder: It’s risky. Will Jack be happy with his role? Will he disrupt team chemistry if he’s not? Will his $6.3 million contract be prohibitive to the Thunder’s plans? A lot of questions on Jack. Maybe too many to take a chance on him.

Do I think it will happen: Doubt it, but I’m intrigued.

Randy Foye, Denver, shooting guard

His contract status: Two years, $6.1 million.

Why it could make sense for the Thunder: Foye is a starting shooting guard with a sensational shot. He’d give Durant and Westbrook a great outlet to kick to on the perimeter. He’ll be 31 next season, so he’s a veteran with plenty of experience to step in and be a contributor now. Foye also is on a tremendous contract that wouldn’t bloat the books.

Why it could make sense for the Nuggets: Denver holds the 11th overall pick in this year’s draft. Trading Foye would allow the Nuggets to commit to a youth movement and clear room for that selection, which could be Michigan State’s Gary Harris or Michigan’s Nik Stauskas.

The drawback for the Thunder: For his career, Foye has appeared in just 11 playoff games. Steven Adams appeared in 18 postseason games as a rookie this year. So while Foye has plenty of regular season experience, who knows what kind of playoff performer he is? He shot 39.2 percent (but 43.8 percent from 3-point range) in his lone postseason with the Clippers in 2012.

Do I think it will happen: Probably not, but I wouldn’t be surprised.

Jared Dudley, L.A. Clippers, small forward/shooting guard

His contract status: Two years, $8.5 million (final year is a player option).

Why it could make sense for the Thunder: Dudley is kind of a version of the type of two-way player fans suddenly are coveting. He can be a solid defender on the perimeter and a lights-out 3-point shooter. Dudley’s contract fits and he’s also a class act that fits the Thunder’s culture.

Why it could make sense for the Clippers: In one season, Dudley went from a promising acquisition to out of their rotation. Now, by shedding his $4.25 million deal, the Clippers could avoid the tax next season, or re-sign Darren Collison and/or Glen Davis without blowing past the threshold. Who know whether the Thunder thinks anything of Dudley? If OKC does, the biggest challenge might be convincing the Clippers to help a West rival.

The drawback for the Thunder: Dudley looked finished this season. He was absolutely abysmal. His production plummeted across the board despite playing with perhaps the best playmaking point guard in the world in Chris Paul. That’s not a good sign, especially seeing as how the Thunder would pair Dudley with a shoot-first point guard in Westbrook.

Do I think it will happen: I’d be shocked.