2018: 500+ Papers Support Skeptics On Climate Alarm

Written by Kenneth Richard

In 2018, over 500 scientific papers were published that cast doubt on the position that anthropogenic CO2 emissions function as the climate’s fundamental control knob…or that otherwise serve to question the efficacy of climate models or the related “consensus” positions commonly endorsed by policymakers and mainstream media sources.

More than 500 scientific papers published in 2018 affirm the position that there are significant limitations and uncertainties inherent in our understanding of climate and climate changes, emphasizing that climate science is not settled.

More specifically, the papers in this compilation support these four main skeptical positions — categorized here as N(1) – N(4) — which question the climate alarm popularized in today’s headlines.

N(1) Natural mechanisms play well more than a negligible role (as claimed by the IPCC) in the net changes in the climate system, which includes temperature variations, precipitation patterns, weather events, etc., and the influence of increased CO2 concentrations on climatic changes are less pronounced than currently imagined.

Solar Influence On Climate (103)

ENSO, NAO, AMO, PDO Climate Influence (22)

Modern Climate In Phase With Natural Variability (8)

Cloud/Aerosol Climate Influence (4)

Volcanic/Tectonic Climate Influence (3)



N(2) The warming/sea levels/glacier and sea ice retreat/hurricane and drought intensities…experienced during the modern era are neither unprecedented or remarkable nor do they fall outside the range of natural variability.

No Net Warming Since Mid/Late 20th Century (36)

A Warmer Past: Non-Hockey Stick Reconstructions (76)

Lack Of Anthropogenic/CO2 Signal In Sea Level Rise (16)

Sea Levels Multiple Meters Higher 4,000-7,000 Years Ago (18)

Nothing Unusual Occurring With Glaciers, Polar Ice (33)

Polar Bear (and other) Populations Not Decreasing (10)

Warming, Acidification Not Harming Oceanic Biosphere (10)

Coral Bleaching A Natural, Non-Anthropogenic Phenomenon (2)

No Increasing Trends In Intense Hurricanes/Storms (8)

No Increasing Trend In Drought/Flood Frequency, Severity (7)

Global Fire Frequency Declining As CO2 Rises (2)

CO2 Changes Lag Temperature Changes By 1000+ Years (3)

N(3) The computer climate models are neither reliable or consistently accurate, the uncertainty and error ranges are irreducible, and projections of future climate states (i.e., an intensification of the hydrological cycle) are not supported by observations and/or are little more than speculation.

Climate Model Unreliability/Biases/Errors (27)

No AGW Changes To Hydrological Cycle Detectable (6)

The CO2 Greenhouse Effect – Climate Driver? (12)

N(4) Current emissions-mitigation policies, especially related to the advocacy for renewables, are often ineffective and even harmful to the environment, whereas elevated CO2 and a warmer climate provide unheralded benefits to the biosphere (i.e., a greener planet and enhanced crop yields, lower mortality with warming).

Failing Renewable Energy, Climate Policies (17)

Wind Power Harming The Environment, Biosphere (19)

Elevated CO2: Greens Planet, Higher Crop Yields (20)

Global Warming Saves Lives. Cold Kills. (9)

Global Losses/Deaths From Weather Disasters Declining (2)

In sharp contrast to the above, the corresponding “consensus” positions that these papers do not support are:

A(1) Close to or over 100% (110%) of the warming since 1950 has been caused by increases in anthropogenic CO2 emissions, leaving natural attribution at something close to 0%.

RealClimate.org: “The best estimate of the warming due to anthropogenic forcings (ANT) is the orange bar (noting the 1𝛔 uncertainties). Reading off the graph, it is 0.7±0.2ºC (5-95%) with the observed warming 0.65±0.06 (5-95%). The attribution then follows as having a mean of ~110%, with a 5-95% range of 80–130%. This easily justifies the IPCC claims of having a mean near 100%, and a very low likelihood of the attribution being less than 50% (p < 0.0001!).”

A(2) Modern warming, glacier, and sea ice recession, sea level rise, drought and hurricane intensities…are all occurring at unprecedentedly high and rapid rates, and the effects are globally synchronous (not just regional)…and thus dangerous consequences to the global biosphere and human civilizations loom in the near future as a consequence of anthropogenic influences.

A(3) The climate models are reliable and accurate, and the scientific understanding of the effects of both natural forcing factors (solar activity, clouds, water vapor, etc.) and CO2 concentration changes on climate is “settled enough”, which means that “the time for debate has ended”.

A(4) The proposed solutions to mitigate the dangerous consequences described in N(4) – namely, wind and solar expansion – are safe, effective, and environmentally-friendly.

To reiterate, the 500+ papers compiled in 2018 support the N(1)-N(4) positions, and they undermine or at least do not support the “consensus” A(1)-A(4) positions. These papers do not do more than that.

In other words, it is not accurate to claim these papers prove that anthropogenic global warming (AGW) positions are invalid, or that AGW claims have now been “debunked”.

There were just over 500 papers published in 2016. Skeptic Papers 2016

There were just under 500 papers published in 2017. Skeptic Papers 2017

Between 2016 and 2018 there were about 1,500 peer-reviewed scientific papers published that support a skeptical position on climate alarm.

Below are the three links to the list of scientific papers for 2018 as well as an outline to their categorization.

Skeptic Papers 2018 (1)

Skeptic Papers 2018 (2)

Skeptic Papers 2018 (3)

1. Climate Change Observation, Reconstruction (189)

No Net Warming Since Mid/Late 20th Century (36)

A Warmer Past: Non-Hockey Stick Reconstructions (76)

Lack Of Anthropogenic/CO2 Signal In Sea Level Rise (16)

Sea Levels Multiple Meters Higher 4,000-7,000 Years Ago (18)

Nothing Unusual Occurring With Glaciers, Polar Ice (33)

Mass Extinction Events Caused By Glaciation, Sea Level Fall (3)

Antarctic Ice Melting In High Geothermal Heat Flux Areas (2)

Abrupt, Degrees-Per-Decade Natural Global Warming (5)

2. Natural Mechanisms Of Weather, Climate Change (152)

Solar Influence On Climate (103)

ENSO, NAO, AMO, PDO Climate Influence (22)

Modern Climate In Phase With Natural Variability (8)

Cloud/Aerosol Climate Influence (4)

Volcanic/Tectonic Climate Influence (3)

The CO2 Greenhouse Effect – Climate Driver? (12)

3. Unsettled Science, Failed Climate Modeling (161)

Climate Model Unreliability/Biases/Errors (27)

Urban Heat Island: Raising Surface Temperatures Artificially (5)

Failing Renewable Energy, Climate Policies (17)

Wind Power Harming The Environment, Biosphere (19)

Elevated CO2: Greens Planet, Higher Crop Yields (20)

Polar Bear (and other) Populations Not Decreasing (10)

Global Warming Saves Lives. Cold Kills. (9)

Warming, Acidification Not Harming Oceanic Biosphere (10)

Coral Bleaching Is A Natural, Non-Anthropogenic Phenomenon (2)

No Increasing Trends In Intense Hurricanes/Storms (8)

No Increasing Trend In Drought/Flood Frequency, Severity (7)

Natural CO2 Emissions A Net Source, Not A Net Sink (5)

Global Fire Frequency Declining As CO2 Rises (2)

CO2 Changes Lag Temperature Changes By 1000+ Years (3)

Global Losses/Deaths From Weather Disasters Declining (2)

No AGW Changes To Hydrological Cycle Detectable (6)

Peak Oil As Myth (3)

Miscellaneous (16)

Read more at No Tricks Zone

Share this: Twitter

Facebook

Parler

LinkedIn

Print

Email

More

Telegram

Pinterest



WhatsApp

Reddit



Pocket

Skype



Tumblr



Related