Battlefield Hardline Ultra vs Low Comparison

Battlefield Hardline Ultra vs Low Comparison

| Source: DSO Gaming Author: Mark Campbell

Battlefield Hardline Ultra vs Low Comparison

Battlefield: Hardline, Ultra versus Low Comparison Screenshots. How much detail is lost moving from the highest to the lowest graphical settings.

Moving from Ultra setting to Low setting no doubt will yield a massive boost in framerate, but if you look closely at the images below you will see that the differences may not have been as night and day as you first thought, at least in some situations.

The top screenshots are taken with Battlefield Hardline at Ultra Game setting and the image below it is from the exact same scene in low in-game settings.

As we can see in the Screenshots above you can see that in some of the screenshots that the differences are not exactly night and day. The largest differences seem to be in shadows, textures and particle affects. For more in depth analysis I advise you to look at the original screenshots at dsogaming as they are of a higher resolution than the screenshots we have here.

Undoubtedly the game looks great at both low and ultra game settings, which is great for those who use use low to mid-end PCs.

You can join the discussion on Battlefield: Hardline's Low to Ultro Screenshot showdown on the OC3D Forums.

Here is a Battlefield: Hardline, Ultra versus Low screenshot comparison. http://t.co/lihNeKnvfT pic.twitter.com/0xbBf20kNy — OC3D (@OC3D) March 23, 2015

1 - Battlefield Hardline Ultra vs Low Comparison «Prev 1 Next»

Most Recent Comments