Download raw source

MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.98.132 with HTTP; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 16:22:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <62D87DF8-ABCD-4B48-9A4B-F52F6D9C5B67@presidentclinton.com> References: <1967210526-1427639644-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-424779131-@b15.c1.bise6.blackberry> <EE632191-09D6-4698-8BB6-807F48B259C8@presidentclinton.com> <6EF64703-4105-43C2-9885-718631D85FED@gmail.com> <7E6E6564-F9AD-4A90-BEA1-8F3D3C643654@presidentclinton.com> <40920375-DAB5-49C8-AECE-BDA4DD02603B@gmail.com> <24EE5C5A-DB38-42A1-814B-CEDA721FD231@gmail.com> <62D87DF8-ABCD-4B48-9A4B-F52F6D9C5B67@presidentclinton.com> Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 19:22:32 -0400 Delivered-To: john.podesta@gmail.com Message-ID: <CAE6FiQ9hq4nYDAL3kjYsisKERAWzijKcNm-CchKGvA4PXpPq=g@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Fwd: NY Times From: John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com> To: johnpodestatemp@outlook.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b414188d466e4051275a3e3 --047d7b414188d466e4051275a3e3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Tina Flournoy <Tina@presidentclinton.com> Date: Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 2:16 PM Subject: Re: NY Times To: Jennifer Palmieri <jennifer.m.palmieri@gmail.com> Cc: Robby Mook <robbymook2015@gmail.com>, John Podesta < john.podesta@gmail.com> A difficult task but it must be attempted On Mar 29, 2015, at 2:05 PM, Jennifer Palmieri < jennifer.m.palmieri@gmail.com> wrote: Yes, none of our actual team talked to Healy. For me this just reinforces need to get the talkers under control. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 29, 2015, at 10:24 AM, Robby Mook <robbymook2015@gmail.com> wrote: I highly doubt anyone in the (currently tentative volunteer) campaign team is talking directly to reporters but I DO think that people are getting things second hand. I had a convo about this last week and when we have everyone in person I'm going to make it clear again. That said, we never really discuss WJC (vs launch plans which we talk about endlessly!). That mtg you and I did with Bari was the first time I'd been in any discussion abt a staffer. So I'm wondering if that's coming from donors/speculators. But regardless, agree we need to tamp stuff down. On Mar 29, 2015, at 11:00 AM, Tina Flournoy <Tina@presidentclinton.com> wrote: Yes, a lot that's frustrating and I've been around long enough to know that talkers talk and most who do often have little in the way of proximity or knowledge. That being said, it does feel like some people who should know better took an opportunity to talk about WJC/his potential role in a way that is not helpful. The rest is Amy/Pat and I'm dealing with them directly. On Mar 29, 2015, at 10:53 AM, Robby Mook <robbymook2015@gmail.com> wrote: Just left you a msg on this. There's a lot that's frustrating. Although I thought other parts portrayed him as engaged. That said we have some dinners coming up to make clear who speaks with authority and who doesn't. When the campaign is "real" it's going to be better but I'm sure they'll always be seeking intrigue. On Mar 29, 2015, at 10:33 AM, Tina Flournoy <Tina@presidentclinton.com> wrote: not happy about this Begin forwarded message: *From:* tina <tflournoy11@gmail.com> *Date:* March 29, 2015 at 10:34:01 AM EDT *To:* Tina <tina@presidentclinton.com> *Reply-To:* <tflournoy11@gmail.com> WILL BILL GET A MINDER? NYT A1, "Clinton Team Hopes to Keep Bill at His Best," by Patrick Healy and Amy Chozick: "In hopes of collaborating with Mr. Clinton better than in 2008 ... advisers to Mrs. Clinton are involving him more closely in early campaign planning, and they are discussing whether to deploy a senior aide to travel with him to keep him focused on his wife's central message. ... "Mr. Clinton has ... brushed up on ... modern campaigns ... 'The Victory Lab: The Secret Science of Winning Campaigns,' a 2012 book by Sasha Issenberg about how data and analytics have upended presidential campaigns, caught Mr. Clinton's eye in an article he read." http://nyti.ms/1Hdft3I Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T --047d7b414188d466e4051275a3e3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">---------- Forwarded messag= e ----------<br>From: <b class=3D"gmail_sendername">Tina Flournoy</b> <span= dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:Tina@presidentclinton.com">Tina@presiden= tclinton.com</a>></span><br>Date: Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 2:16 PM<br>Subjec= t: Re: NY Times<br>To: Jennifer Palmieri <<a href=3D"mailto:jennifer.m.p= almieri@gmail.com">jennifer.m.palmieri@gmail.com</a>><br>Cc: Robby Mook = <<a href=3D"mailto:robbymook2015@gmail.com">robbymook2015@gmail.com</a>&= gt;, John Podesta <<a href=3D"mailto:john.podesta@gmail.com">john.podest= a@gmail.com</a>><br><br><br> <div dir=3D"auto"> <div>A difficult task but it must be attempted<br> <br> <br> </div><div><div class=3D"h5"> <div><br> On Mar 29, 2015, at 2:05 PM, Jennifer Palmieri <<a href=3D"mailto:jennif= er.m.palmieri@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">jennifer.m.palmieri@gmail.com</a= >> wrote:<br> <br> </div> <blockquote type=3D"cite"> <div> <div>Yes, none of our actual team talked to Healy.=C2=A0 For me this just r= einforces need to get the talkers under control.=C2=A0<br> <br> Sent from my iPhone</div> <div><br> On Mar 29, 2015, at 10:24 AM, Robby Mook <<a href=3D"mailto:robbymook201= 5@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">robbymook2015@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br> <br> </div> <blockquote type=3D"cite"> <div> <div>I highly doubt anyone in the (currently tentative volunteer) campaign = team is talking directly to reporters but I DO think that people are gettin= g things second hand.=C2=A0 I had a convo about this last week and when we = have everyone in person I'm going to make it clear again.=C2=A0 That said, we never really discuss WJC (vs laun= ch plans which we talk about endlessly!).=C2=A0 That mtg you and I did with= Bari was the first time I'd been in any discussion abt a staffer.=C2= =A0 So I'm wondering if that's coming from donors/speculators. =C2=A0But regardless, agree we need to tamp stuff down. =C2=A0<br> <br> <br> </div> <div><br> On Mar 29, 2015, at 11:00 AM, Tina Flournoy <<a href=3D"mailto:Tina@pres= identclinton.com" target=3D"_blank">Tina@presidentclinton.com</a>> wrote= :<br> <br> </div> <blockquote type=3D"cite"> <div> <div>Yes, a lot that's frustrating and =C2=A0I've been around long = enough to know that talkers talk and most who do often have little in the w= ay of proximity or knowledge. That being said, it does feel like some peopl= e who should know better took an opportunity to talk about WJC/his potential role in a way that is not helpful. The res= t is Amy/Pat and I'm dealing with them directly.<br> <br> <br> </div> <div><br> On Mar 29, 2015, at 10:53 AM, Robby Mook <<a href=3D"mailto:robbymook201= 5@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">robbymook2015@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br> <br> </div> <blockquote type=3D"cite"> <div> <div>Just left you a msg on this.=C2=A0</div> <div>There's a lot that's frustrating.=C2=A0 Although I thought oth= er parts portrayed him as engaged.=C2=A0</div> <div>That said we have some dinners coming up to make clear who speaks with= authority and who doesn't.=C2=A0 When the campaign is "real"= it's going to be better but I'm sure they'll always be seeking= intrigue. =C2=A0</div> <div><br> <br> </div> <div><br> On Mar 29, 2015, at 10:33 AM, Tina Flournoy <<a href=3D"mailto:Tina@pres= identclinton.com" target=3D"_blank">Tina@presidentclinton.com</a>> wrote= :<br> <br> </div> <blockquote type=3D"cite"> <div> <div>not happy about this<br> <br> <br> </div> <div><br> Begin forwarded message:<br> <br> </div> <blockquote type=3D"cite"> <div><b>From:</b> tina <<a href=3D"mailto:tflournoy11@gmail.com" target= =3D"_blank">tflournoy11@gmail.com</a>><br> <b>Date:</b> March 29, 2015 at 10:34:01 AM EDT<br> <b>To:</b> Tina <<a href=3D"mailto:tina@presidentclinton.com" target=3D"= _blank">tina@presidentclinton.com</a>><br> <b>Reply-To:</b> <<a href=3D"mailto:tflournoy11@gmail.com" target=3D"_bl= ank">tflournoy11@gmail.com</a>><br> <br> </div> </blockquote> <blockquote type=3D"cite"> <div><span>WILL BILL GET A MINDER? NYT A1, "Clinton Team Hopes to Keep= Bill at His Best," by Patrick Healy and Amy Chozick: "In hopes o= f collaborating with Mr. Clinton better than in 2008 ... advisers to Mrs. C= linton are involving him more closely in early campaign planning, and they are discussing whether to deploy a senior aide= to travel with him to keep him focused on his wife's central message. = ...</span><br> <span></span><br> <span>"Mr. Clinton has ... brushed up on ... modern campaigns ... '= ;The Victory Lab: The Secret Science of Winning Campaigns,' a 2012 book= by Sasha Issenberg about how data and analytics have upended presidential = campaigns, caught Mr. Clinton's eye in an article he read." <a href=3D"http://nyti.ms/1Hdft3I" target=3D"_blank">http:/= /nyti.ms/1Hdft3I</a></span><br> <span>Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T</span><br> </div> </blockquote> </div> </blockquote> </div> </blockquote> </div> </blockquote> </div> </blockquote> </div> </blockquote> </div></div></div> </div><br></div> --047d7b414188d466e4051275a3e3--