Foreword

In this post, I’ll try to explain how to setup logging (and dependency injection in the process) in a .Net Core library, and setup an application configuring listeners and filters as an example.

You can Go directly to the Solution if you want.

The context, the mind process

My DEM.Net project is a class library, intended to be used as a NuGet Package for any kind of .Net application (WebAPI, Console app, WinForms, other class library).

At the early development stage of this project, I was using good old Console.WriteLine() or Debug.WriteLine() statements to give output to me, as a developer inside Visual Studio.

Then when the classes were OK, I needed to write only warnings in specific cases. I still could use Console.WriteLine("WARNING: bla bla") , but this is ugly I know you can feel it.

Why should I log

I usually log For troubleshooting : progress of a task, cases encountered, dumps of in-memory structures : everything that will be useful if I need to know what was running and why.

To give the consuming code a basic knowledge of the progress of their demand. Anything that could prevent the “ black box “ effect : waiting for something to complete with no feedback.

At different levels (Trace, Debug, Info, Warn, Error, Critical) : it’s very important to prioritize what’s important and what’s internal or critical.

With categories, allowing logical grouping of messages.

The rule-of-thumb is : read the logs, and you should know exactly what is going on inside the code.

So I have built a custom wrapper for different types of logs.

using System.Diagnostics ; public static class Logger { public static void Info ( string message ) { Trace . TraceInformation ( message ); } // ... plus other methods for each log lvel }

I could emit logs from my code with a single line, and I knew I could migrate with no pain when I will find a solution for clean logging.

Logger . Info ( $"Processing file { fileName } ..." );

The problem

Using System.Diagnostics.Trace , library consumers are constrained to listen to Traces, and coded this way, there is no categories to enable them to filter out those trace logs.

, library consumers are constrained to listen to Traces, and coded this way, there is no categories to enable them to filter out those trace logs. Depending on the consumer logging system, they may need to redirect my Trace output. That’s a lot to ask, they may never do that.

I need to enable logging without actually logging anywhere . The consumer can be able to choose where the traces go, either Console, Trace, a Database, Event Logs, File, …

. The consumer can be able to choose where the traces go, either Console, Trace, a Database, Event Logs, File, … I need to find a solid solution, where there is no custom hand-coded class, I want to be pro.

The solution

The ILogger<T> interface

This interface resides in the NuGet package Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions , which is part of ASP.Net Extensions catalog.

.NET APIs for commonly used programming patterns and utilities, such as dependency injection, logging, and configuration.

This is not tied to ASP.Net alone in any way. We can use it in our library!

This interface is simple and allows log calls to be made without having a concrete implementation. Don’t dive into the internals, it’s made for ease of use. Just remember that the generic type T is the type of the service for which the logging is made. Remember T as TYourService.

Let’s setup :

A library with a simple service. We want this service to log its activity.

A Console app referencing the library and calling the service.

1. Starting point : a class library with your MyService

Create a new Class Library project MyNetStandardLib targeting .Net Standard 2.0.

Your service takes a param and simulates a long processing task for 1 second.

using System ; using System.Threading ; namespace MyNetStandardLib { public class MyService { public void DoSomething ( string theParam ) { // Simulate something we do for 1 second Thread . Sleep ( 1000 ); // done } } }

2. Add package Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions

You can do it by right clicking your project and choosing Add NuGet Packages… or via dotNet CLI:

nuget add Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions

3. Add support for ILogger<TYourService>

Change the service class as follows:

Add a constructor taking an ILogger<MyService>

Add a backing field for the logger

public class MyService { // backing field private readonly ILogger < MyService > _logger ; // constructor public MyService ( ILogger < MyService > logger = null ) { _logger = logger ; } public void DoSomething ( string theParam ) { _logger ?. LogInformation ( $"DoSometing with { theParam } ..." ); // Simultate something me do for 1 second Thread . Sleep ( 1000 ); // Test logs at each level _logger ?. LogTrace ( "DoSometing TRACE message" ); _logger ?. LogDebug ( "DoSometing DEBUG message" ); _logger ?. LogInformation ( "DoSometing INFO message" ); _logger ?. LogWarning ( "DoSometing WARN message" ); _logger ?. LogError ( "DoSometing ERROR message" ); _logger ?. LogCritical ( "DoSometing CRITICAL message" ); } }

At this point, apart from the new Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions dependency, nothing has changed from a caller perspective.

If a program was calling MyService it still can do it after recompilation because the ILogger is optional.

it still can do it after recompilation because the is optional. If null is passed for the ILogger , the service still works thanks to the null check operator _logger ? .LogInformation() which is equivalent to:

if ( _logger != null ) _logger . LogInformation (...);

Note that if you are migrating an existing service from your code that already has a constructor with parameters, your could pass an optional ILogger as the last parameter.

The ILogger passed as a parameter is perfectly suited for dependency injection. With dependency injection, we can register a concrete implementation of the Logger on the caller side. Let’s do it the .Net way!

4. The caller application, using dependency injection

So, now we have a class library that is logging. How can connect the wires ?

ASP.Net Core has already a DI container and could call our library directly. But this is very well documented yet and falls outside the scope of this article.

We are going to create a simple Console App. Follow those steps, in order to setup dependency injection and logging:

Create a new Console App,

Add a project reference to MyNetStandardLib ,

, Add a NuGet package Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection . This is the Microsoft DI container. There are plenty of others (AutoFac, StructureMap, Ninject among others), but I’ll stick to the .Net Foundation stack.

So let’s change the Program.cs file from this:

namespace TestConsole { class Program { static void Main ( string [] args ) { Console . WriteLine ( "Hello World!" ); } } }

to that:

using Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection ; using System ; namespace TestConsole { // Program with Dependency Injection // Still no logging support! class Program { static void Main ( string [] args ) { // Setting up dependency injection var serviceCollection = new ServiceCollection (); ConfigureServices ( serviceCollection ); var serviceProvider = serviceCollection . BuildServiceProvider (); // Get an instance of the service var myService = serviceProvider . GetService < MyNetStandardLib . MyService >(); // Call the service (logs are made here) myService . DoSomething (); Console . ReadLine (); } private static void ConfigureServices ( ServiceCollection services ) { // Register service from the library services . AddTransient < MyNetStandardLib . MyService >(); } } }

Let’s explain:

We create the DI container ServicesCollection and configure it in a separate method for clarity.

and configure it in a separate method for clarity. We register our MyService as a Transient (ie: short lived instance within the calling code variable’s scope)

as a Transient (ie: short lived instance within the calling code variable’s scope) When we call var myService = serviceProvider.GetService<MyNetStandardLib.MyService>(); the DI container will instanciate the MyService and will check the dependency tree for the object and pass required instances that are registered within the container. As we have still not registered any ILogger , a null will be passed.

the DI container will instanciate the and will check the dependency tree for the object and pass required instances that are registered within the container. As we have still not registered any , a will be passed. We can use the myService variable as usual, calling the DoSomething service

5. Add Logging support

We will add Console and Debug loggers. For a Console App, this will be useful because we will see logs in the console and in the Output>Debug window.

Add the following NuGet packages:

Microsoft.Extensions.Logging

Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Console

Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Debug

Add the following using statements at the top of Program.cs

using Microsoft.Extensions.Logging ; using Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Console ; using Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Debug ;

Change the ConfigureServices method as follows:

private static void ConfigureServices ( ServiceCollection services ) { services . AddLogging ( config => { config . AddDebug (); // Log to debug (debug window in Visual Studio or any debugger attached) config . AddConsole (); // Log to console (colored !) }) . Configure < LoggerFilterOptions >( options => { options . AddFilter < DebugLoggerProvider >( null /* category*/ , LogLevel . Information /* min level */ ); options . AddFilter < ConsoleLoggerProvider >( null /* category*/ , LogLevel . Warning /* min level */ ); }) . AddTransient < MyNetStandardLib . MyService >(); // Register service from the library }

Very, very neat and powerful. Let’s explain:

services.AddLogging allows us to add various loggers to the DI container and configure their options. Here we register the Console and Debug loggers with AddConsole() and AddDebug() : two extensions methods provided by their respective NuGet packages.

allows us to add various loggers to the DI container and configure their options. Here we register the Console and Debug loggers with and : two extensions methods provided by their respective NuGet packages. Then we configure (optionally) their filter level. The first parameter is the category: not very well documented, it acts as a StartsWith or Contains filter on the type name T of ILogger<T> , allowing to filter which logs we want to listen or mute. The second parameter takes a LogLevel , allowing to listen only when log have a level greater or equal than the specified parameter.



This configuration can also be made via configuration files. Now, every time a ILogger<T> is required, as in our MyService constructor, an instance will be injected, and this instance will log to the destinations registered.

6. Test run

After the Console App launch, this is what we see in the Console window. Note that only Warn, Error and Critical logs are written, as configured:

And this is what we see in the Debug window, note that Info level is also written, as configured:

Conclusion

We have seen how powerful Dependency Injection is, and how we can build a library that supports logging without constraining the calling application.

You can find all the source files for this project here (Tested on VS2019, both Windows and Mac) : https://github.com/xfischer/CoreLoggingTests.

Sources

Those articles helped me a lot, and it’s good to cite them: