Hillary can continue in her telling silence because America will answer that question for her, depending completely upon which way this election takes us

If Nixon Had Done Emailgate, He Would Have Died In Prison

The second presidential debate pushed these two thoughts into the front of my brain: First, why are the moderators always allowed to be so egregiously, unapologetically, shamelessly biased against Mr. Trump? And, secondly, and this is not supposed to be funny - indeed, it is no laughing matter - why didn’t Hillary do her part of the debate dressed in orange and in a concrete and steel cell - pacing back and forth under an observation camera? I mean, if our principally spineless nation is going to stand around with its hands in its pockets, and allow this woman to continue her candidacy, she should do that from the same sort of ‘study’ in which Adolf Hitler wrote ‘Mein Kampf.’ She has more than earned that. And no judge would grant her bail, seeing that she is the quintessential flight risk. [A prefatory note: For the sake of life-giving brevity, I won’t spend a lot of time and space attempting to document the obviously nefarious janitorial behavior of Hillary Clinton. Anyone who has Internet access and any gray matter can check out the colorful history of former FLOTUS, United States Senator, Secretary of State, and now presidential candidate Clinton. Further, the controversial Clinton Foundation is an ever-morphing dark castle that already has an abundance of good reading out there documenting its shady movement. Reciting its exploits is a temptation that would kill my story - because it’s just too much to wade through. In fact, let’s just call this whole thing a ‘what if’ (which is really what it is). So many have seen enough of the information available thoroughly exposing both the Clintons and their altruistic-looking ‘Foundation’ as nothing short of an elaborately engineered storefront laundering money and hiding all sorts of criminal behavior. But that’s just my opinion - and I’m still entitled to that. For now.]

Finally I Can See What ‘Emailgate’ is REALLY All About! My last article, Finally I Can See What ‘Emailgate’ is REALLY All About!, was the detailed, nascent version of what you’re reading here. I was thinking aloud about Hillary’s ‘emailgate’, I wrote everything down and ran it past the many readers of Canada Free Press and then the several journals, blogs and message boards that subsequently picked up the article. I didn’t find a single commentor who disagreed with any of my conclusions. Some of you may be thinking, “They probably didn’t know how to type” I thought about that, myself. In its last paragraph I quoted Jon Sopel, North American editor for BBC News (and most probably the man who minted the term ‘emailgate’). In his March 2015 article, one of the earliest about that, Jon asked a most elementary question that has yet to be answered: “But if Hillary Clinton is - genuinely - so supremely relaxed about everyone seeing her e-mails, why did she conduct her business through this private e-mail account and server, rather than through normal US government systems?” (And, as Jon didn’t then know, why did she permanently delete 33,000 of them? We had to drag that fact out of her smoke and mirrors, ourselves.) After a lot of thought, I feel certain that I do know the answer to that question - and here it is, pure and simple. To set the stage, I’ll give you a ‘for instance’.... Let’s say I am a Saudi Arabian prince, ‘Mohammed,’ who possesses tons of power, money and evil intent. (Huge money, on this earth, enables anyone to walk tall.) And, let’s say I want an hour and a half of face time with the sold-out president of the United States (who is a best friend to all my other keffiyeh/robe-wearing, wealthy friends and relatives). I know that this is not the standard request that requires submitting a few government forms and a 30-day wait for consideration and approval. I also know that between Barack and me are dozens of watching eyes and monitored telephones. Besides all that, my business with the president must stay entirely off the record. Maybe I want to help some Iranian friends with a rocket-powered gift package they are preparing for Israel. Who knows? Nevertheless, how can I go about this so I can stay in the shadows?

Demise of constitutional America No problem! The Great Satan’s (America’s) Secretary of State is running a ‘full service shop’ in order to accommodate, for the right price or barter, exactly what I want. She has her own private communications system set up at her charming country home in Chappaqua. I can acquire that e-mail address from any one of my friends or relatives who have already used it. The real world knows that Hillary is a past master at getting things done, ‘extra empirium’. So I drop her an e-mail from my own double-blinded e-mail account, tender my encrypted request, and wait for a quote. An hour or so, later, I am told, through another stoutly encrypted RSVP mailing, that my audience with the president can of course happen. The price is steep. “We will press ahead whenever the Clinton Foundation notifies us of your generous donation.” While Hillary and Barack may not be the best of friends, they are fellow employees - and this is strictly business. That afternoon Mohammed receives a confirming e-mail sent from the same place he’d sent his earlier request. The mailing acknowledges receipt of funds and also contains a backdoor address to the admin of that server. Everything is arranged. He knows the drill - If he ever breathes a word of the transaction/arrangement that just took place he won’t be able to find a hole deep or dark enough to save his donkey. And, despite any titillating, clandestine, cloak-and-dagger adventure that may have happened up to that point, Mohammed soberly understands that THAT threat is absolutely backed up by all the sovereign power a blindly obedient United States Government can muster. The above scenario was, of course from my imagination. But given Hillary’s performance during her glaringly apparent connection/involvement (that which we have seen, anyway) in years of the use and abuse of all sorts of material and access to thrones and power and its kindred secrets/documentation, it naturally follows that her appointment to the office of Secretary of State - by ultra-patriot, Captain America himself, Barack Obama - could be seen as tantamount to leaving the alpha wolf to guard literally anything that had to do with the farm. [I, for one, will never forget watching an exaulted Saudi prince getting out of his chopper on the White House lawn and striding boldly into our president’s office ... as the stammering announcer expressed his total ignorance as to the nature of his ‘unscheduled’ visit. That was not my imagination.] But the most genius part of it all (and any lawyer would agree with me) was the ‘PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY’ that very naturally came packed with the whole scheme. And here I quote myself again ... “(But) ... if anything ever backfired - if she were ever questioned about anything at all - she always, instantly has the PERFECT plausible deniability in reciting pretty much exactly what we’ve been hearing for the past year and a half: ‘Gee, it was just a matter of convenience. Everybody uses these newfangled appliances - from cell phones to laptops and PCs - to expedite transmission of all sorts of stuff as we do our daily business!’” I believe that she knew, LONG BEFORE SHE EVER SET UP SHOP IN HER GARAGE, (INSTALLING AN UNMONITORED CONDUIT FROM THE WORLD’S MOST SECURE ETHERNET) that at the first sign of trouble she would simply raise her hands in a ditzy exasperation (long enough for her terrified IT guy to strategically scrub the daily business discs). And walk away from the whole mess. This, after all, is the one top government employee who has the luxury of excusing even the most serious of her transgressions with a crowdpleasing “What DIFFERENCE does it make???!!” But most terrifying is really about where we are in the demise of constitutional America. A monstrously burgeoning portion of the left’s digitally entertained/mesmerized constituency doesn’t give a good dam regarding much of anything nowadays so long as it doesn’t interfere with their own personal peace. And that’s how today’s professional politicians can move about in godlike confidence and shameless hubris: It’s because, effectively, nobody’s watching. And the completely collaborative liberal media/entertainment world has churned all of our most dangerously looming threats into profitable parodies making fun of the right’s solidly documented warnings. An easy way to fill a cavernous ravine with cars full of dead people is to convince folks that the “BRIDGE IS OUT” signs are actually just like left over pieces of an old ‘Burma Shave’ joke. Liberal news people/ ‘commentators’ are masters of owning a story by telling it in a way that makes the clearest face of any plain fact appear to be the most subtle of fabricated deception. Combine that sort of devlish apologetics with the bludgeon of PC ridicule, and it’s no wonder that most people whose only source of knowledge is cable tv are actually so willing to give space to and make treaties with peoples and things that will kill them (just as the Bible talks about in Isaiah 28:15 ... “Because ye have said, We have made a covenant with death, and with hell are we at agreement; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, it shall not come unto us: for we have made lies our refuge, and under falsehood have we hid ourselves:” It’s because it’s ‘thinking’ that is done for you. It’s easier than standing on truth and a good conscience. And it circumvents the crucifiction that today is awaiting anyone who doesn’t keep his eyes straight ahead and/or go with the flow.

Hillary Clinton and her two lap dogs - James Comey and Loretta Lynch - aren’t just weathering the storm. They are surfing on its waves toward the Marxist autocratic paradise You know when Watergate went down, everybody and their dog went after Richard Nixon & Co. with a lust for blood. Today in the face of a possible security breach like the civilized world has never seen, and other breathtaking felonies, Hillary Clinton and her two lap dogs - James Comey and Loretta Lynch - aren’t just weathering the storm. They are surfing on its waves toward the Marxist autocratic paradise their fearless leader has all but ensured for them. Save for a precious few voices in Congress, St. Julien Assange, INDEPENDENT journalistic efforts such as Canada Free Press and others like them, and grassroots conservative America along with the unmerited grace of our very loving and patient Creator-God, the swaggering subterfuge of modern liberal America will succeed in opening a Pandora’s box that will surely destroy us. Repeating more thoughts from my first installment: Obama, who should be leading the charge, FBI boss Comey, and Attorney General Lynch (who is supposed to be the crème de la crème of the thorough, junkyard-dog-meanest prosecutors out there), are all entrusted to root out the threats that, of necessity, plague world power nations such as ours. And, instead, they are treating one of the biggest possible security breaches - EVER - like it is another unfortunate caprice by poor ‘careless’ Hillary. And she is free and happy. And America is tired of hearing about it. Period. And again ... If you or I, a.k.a. ‘John Q. public’, pulled even half the stuff that has been taking place, more or less noticeably, since Hillary Clinton married Bill, we would be serving a life sentence in the electric chair in some federal institution. But Ms. Clinton, along the way in her privileged life and career that we’ve financed for her, bought every ‘Get Out Of Jail Free’ card (and character) that her momentus avarice could purchase. In the most recent presidential debate, both candidates basically said that this coming election will be the last fork in the road deciding, like no fork prior, what America will be - irreversibly. The progeny of the baby boomers have had their chance and say. And NOW, if every man-Jack of conservatism doesn’t NOW rally in COMPLETE SOLIDARITY and put the Obamas and Clintons, et al., at bay for at least the next four years, we can kiss our formerly great nation and freedoms goodbye. And the people who dare to write articles such as these will soon have prices on their heads. Even now, in this cyber-based 21st-century America, we are standing and speaking on the rapidly disappearing grace of borrowed ground. If we have something to say, we had better say it now. After this we won’t be given another opportunity. As for Jon Sopel’s question: “But if Hillary Clinton is - genuinely - so supremely relaxed about everyone seeing her e-mails, why did she conduct her business through this private e-mail account and server, rather than through normal US government systems?” .... Hillary can continue in her telling silence because America will answer that question for her, depending completely upon which way this election takes us.



Dave Merrick -- Bio and Archives Dave Merrick, Davemerrick.us is an internationally known and published artist whose works reach into the greatest diversity of audiences. Known primarily for his astoundingly lifelike portraiture, Merrick’s drawings and paintings grace the walls of an impressive array of well-known corporate and private clientele. Many of his published wildlife pieces have become some of America’s most popular animal imagery. He has more original work in the Pro-Rodeo Hall of Fame than any other artist. His wildlife and Southwestern-theme work is distributed internationally through Joan Cawley Galleries of Scottsdale AZ.

{/exp:ce_cache:it}