NEW: @TGowdySC responds to Democrat critics of GOP memo: “I get that Adam Schiff and others are worried about what's not in my memo. I wish that they were equally concerned about what's not in the FISA application” WATCH FULL INTERVIEW THIS MORNING ON @FaceTheNation : pic.twitter.com/kn7lZd8Igq

Rep. Trey Gowdy, one of the authors of the FISA abuse memo, responds to his fellow House Intelligence Committee member, Rep. Adam Schiff's concerns about the content of the memo.



"I get that Adam Schiff and others are worried about what is not in my memo. I wish that they were equally concerned about what's not in the FISA application," Gowdy said about the memo's core allegation, that political documents were passed off as intelligence to obtain a surveillance warrant on a member of the Trump campaign.





MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, the FBI was gravely concerned that there was information missing from this memo, that it actually was dangerous in setting a precedent in terms of disclosing classified information, and it could actually hurt future intelligence efforts.







How do you respond to that and to Chris Wray?



REP. TREY GOWDY: Difficult facts make for really bad precedent.



I hope this is a one-off. I hope it is a one-off that Congress takes this position, but I also hope it's a one-off that a FISA application contains errors and product that is funded by a political opponent. I hope that is a one-off. So...



BRENNAN: That's the Steele dossier that you are pointing to there?



GOWDY: But it's both the Steele dossier and who paid for it and whether or not it was vetted. But it's also what was not in it.



This is an application to a court. So, I get that Adam Schiff and others are worried about what is not in my memo. I wish that they were equally concerned about what's not in the FISA application, which is a lot of really important information about the source and his sub-sources and the fact that he was hired by the DNC and the Clinton campaign, and the fact that he was biased against President Trump.



That is all information that the finder of fact is entitled to.