Clinical Pearls from ACEP 2018 – San Diego, CA

Written by Salim Rezaie REBEL EM

This year ACEP 2018 took place in San Diego, CA from Oct 1st– 4th, 2018. There were lots of amazing speakers and topics as was evidenced by the eruption of everyone’s twitter feeds with the #ACEP18 hashtag. I was fortunate enough to not only attend, but also speak at this amazing conference. I was approached by several attendees requesting that I put together a list of my favorite pearls from this conference, as I have done in years past on REBEL EM. Below is my top 10 list, in no particular order.

Pearl #1: Plateau Pressure is More Important than the Peak Inspiratory Pressure When Patients are on the Ventilator – Mike Winters

Although EM physicians frequently intubate patients, many are not facile with ventilator management 394 EM attendings surveyed, 211 responded (53.6%) à5% reported receiving ≤3 hours of ventilation-related education from EM sources over the past year and 46% reported receiving between 0 – 1 hour of education [1]

Ventilator Pressures: Peak Inspiratory Pressure & Plateau Pressure Peak Pressure – Reflects the pressure from airflow resistance and respiratory system compliance (measured during inspiratory flow); it is the pressure to overcome endotracheal tube and the large proximal airways & the elastic pressure of the lung (pressure to distend the small airways and the alveoli) Plateau Pressure (PPlat): The pressure needed to distend the small airway and alveoli (Measure with end-inspiratory hold); The goal is to keep PPlat <30cm H20.



Pearl #2: Computerized Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram is NOT Accurate [2] – Amal Mattu

855 triage ECGs collected à222 (26%) interpreted by computer as normal à1/222 had clinical significance [3]

If we get on average 10 ECGs per shift + Work 15 Shifts in a month = 150 ECGs/month àOver 12 months this equals 1,800 ECGs/year àThis means we would miss 8 clinically significant bad outcomes over the course of the year if we depended on computerized interpretation of ECGs

ECG computers are not programmed to pick up subtle changes and if we depend on this read will miss subtle signs of ACS

Also, when in doubt, get a 2ndECG, as ACS is a dynamic process

Pearl #3: There is NO High-Level Evidence that Pre-Hospital Spinal Immobilization in Trauma Patients Positively Impacts Patient Oriented Outcomes – Christopher Colwell

Spinal Immobilization: Does NOT Help Immobilize the Cervical Spine [4] Does NOT Decrease Rates of Spinal Cord Injury [5] INCREASES the Difficulty of Airway management [6] CAN Cause Pressure Ulcers [7] CHANGES the Physical Exam [8] Worsens Pulmonary Function [9] INCREASES Intracranial Pressure [10]



Pearl #4: BNP is NOT Helpful in the Diagnosis of CHF – Jerome Hoffman & Rick Bukata

Physician gestalt is already accurate in patients with clinically obvious CHF

BNP is not associated with improving patient oriented outcomes such as length of stay, return visits, and overall health care costs [11]

201 patients with intermediate probability of CHFàNo difference in the accuracy of ED physicians diagnosis, time to diagnosis, time to discharge, length of stay, ICU admission rate, or 60 day survival [12]

BNP is NOT helpful at extremes when the diagnosis is clinically obvious, and less helpful in patients that are less clinically obvious. Use history & POCUS in these cases not BNP.

Pearl #5: Good PreOx Makes ApOx Superfluous in the ED in Most Cases – Anand Swaminathan

Single Institution RCT of Apneic Oxygenation (ApOx) vs Usual Care à200 patients randomized àNo difference in mean lowest SpO2 [13]

In patients who receive proper pre-oxygenation (PreOx), defined as 3 minutes with flush 100% O2, apneic oxygenation may be a superfluous intervention

ApOx is not a complicated procedure, not expensive, and has not been shown to be harmful. The absence of benefit doesn’t mean there is no group who won’t benefit (i.e. prolonged apnea times and crash intubations) and should be continued to be used until we have better ways to predict which intubations are going to be difficult.

Pearl #6: It is Completely Normal and Expected to Have a Cough for 2 or even 3 Weeks After Onset of Upper Respiratory Illness – Jerome Hoffman & Rick Bukata

Don’t forget to tell patients that cough from upper respiratory illness can last approximately 3 weeks A systematic review of 1821 patients with upper respiratory infection àDuration of cough 15.3 – 28.6 days [14]

It is important to emphasize the natural history of cough from respiratory illness with patients when they seek care for an episode of acute cough from respiratory illness. It is also important to emphasize that they should seek care if they are having worsening symptoms.

Pearl #7: Measuring the Volume of Intra-Parenchymal Hemorrhage (IPH) on CT is as Simple as ABC/2 [15] – Matthew Siket

Hemorrhage volume can be a predictor of 30-day mortality after spontaneous ICH

ABC/2 A = Largest hemorrhage diameter on CT B = Diameter 90 degrees to A on the same slice C = Approximate number of CT slices with hemorrhage multiplied by slice thickness (CT slices are usually measured in millimeters, so count # of 5mm cuts, then divide by 2) Divided by 2 (/2) = approximates an ellipsoid

MDCalc has the formulafor you, so you can just type in the measurements

Pearl #8: Cardiovascular Testing in ED Patients with Low Risk Chest Pain is Associated with Increased Downstream Testing WITHOUT a Reduction in Acute Myocardial Infarctions [16] – Jerome Hoffman & Rick Bukata

Retrospective cohort analysis of 926,633 patients between noninvasive testing or coronary angiography within 2 days or 30 days of presentation for chest pain vs no testing Testing within 2 days vs no testing associated with: Increase in coronary angiography (7.7 per 1000 patients tested) at 1 year Increase in revascularization PCI and/or CABG (15.0 per 1000 patients tested) at 1 year NO SIGNIFICANT change in AMI admission (2.3 per 1000 patients tested) at 1 year Testing within 30 days vs no testing associated with: Increase in coronary angiography (36.5 per 1000 patients tested) at 1 year Increase in revascularization – PCI and/or CABG (22.8 per 1000 patients tested) at 1 year Increase but NOT SIGNIFICANT change in AMI admission (7.8 per 1000 patients tested) No subgroup in which testing was performed was associated with reduction in AMI admissions

Cardiac testing in patients presenting to the ED with chest pain was associated with increased downstream testing and treatment without a statistically significant reduction in AMI admissions and deferral of testing is not associated with worse outcomes

Pearl #9: Capnography Tells you What Your Patients Oxygen Saturation Will Be, Pulse Oximetery Tells you What Your Patients Oxygen Saturation Was – Mike Winters

Pulse Oximetry measures oxygenation or amount of arterial blood oxygen saturation via device clipped to the finger or earlobe. Pulse ox may take time to detect potential problems, and may appear normal even if a patient is not breathing (i.e. the pulse ox lag)

Also, when a patient desaturates, the pulse ox will lag even when you are providing good oxygenation (i.e. delayed increase in pulse ox)

Capnography reflects breath to breath ventilation, detects hypoventilation/apnea immediately, and does not appear normal if your patient is not breathing

70 patients underwent sedated diagnostic colonoscopy (35 with supplemental oxygen and 35 without supplemental oxygen) [17] After sedation SpO2 decreased as alveolar hypoventilation developed in each group At peak etCO2, SpO2 was significantly increased by more than 5% in the oxygen supplementation group when compared with the room air group (98.6% vs 93.1%) SpO2 monitoring during oxygen supplementation overestimates SpO2 and provides little information about adequacy of alveolar hypoventilation



Pearl #10: Back Up Head Elevated (BUHE) Intubation is Better than Supine Intubation [18] – Anand Swaminathan

Retrospective review of all adult patients undergoing emergent tracheal intubation outside of the operating room 528 patients analyzed Intubation-related complications: ≥3 Attempts or >10min Duration Hypoxemia <90% SpO2 Esophageal Intubation or Esophageal Aspiration Intubation Related Complication: Supine Position: 22.6% BUHE Position: 9.3%



References:

Post Peer Reviewed By:Anand Swaminathan, MD (Twitter: @EMSwami)