(I'm used to typing SCP-XXXX oops, sorry if some of this uses the wrong number of X's)

A Foundation web crawler is currently in place to monitor for any mention of the website My Daily Odd Life/SCP-XXX across all internet platforms.

I'm not really a fan of the way you introduce sub-designations through this. I'd suggest rewording to something like "A Foundation web crawler is to monitor for any mention of SCP-XXX, the website My Daily Odd Life, across all internet platforms."

Actually tbf, the "the website My Daily Odd Life" line should likely be moved into the description.

Any instances of SCP-XXX must be removed from public access immediately. Any images, videos or recordings known to contain SCP-XXX must be removed.

You should be consistent here: "instances of SCP-XXX" implies "SCP-XXX is not one thing"; whereas "known to contain SCP-XXX" implies "SCP-XXX is one thing". I'd suggest something like "Any instances of SCP-XXX are to be removed from the internet immediately, along with images, videos or recordings containing SCP-XXX instances."

are required to be submitted

drop the "required" here

the active site manager before any response may be made.

There hasn't been mention of a specific site that deals with SCP-XXX, so it's a little unclear who is meant here. I'd suggest introducing e.g, MTF Mu-4 (“Debuggers”) here as a point of contact. I'd also suggest rewording the "before any response" to indicate that they'd handle devising the response.

At no time should SCP-XXX be given any information pertaining to the Foundation.

I'm kinda conflicted on this. Like it definitely feels like a good line sure but also, clearance levels exist. No-one in the Foundation is going to give out information to a SCP without a good reason/permission. I'd suggest cutting it as an assumed thing.

accessible for public viewing.

This makes it sound like it's in a museum or something: like, a physical object. I'd suggest something like "accessible on the internet."

display variations in physical anomalies, with no distinguishable pattern.

This feels really clunky and kinda off. I feel like "anomalies" is a bad way to describe them being like, different species? Since it implies a level of "not physically possible"? "appearance" might work better here, with the "no distinguishable pattern" line being cut and "both humanoid and non-humanoid entities" being moved into it's place?

along with a small bio on all of its known staff members

There's 300 staff members: this section of the website homepage feels really long and not very useful for anyone who visits it. Like it feels to me that the homepage should be more modelled on e.g, the front page of medium .

This section is currently hypothesized to be suggested to the viewer based on their previous searches.

Can the Foundation not test this hypothesis by like, getting a bunch of D-class to search for one very specific thing and then view the homepage? I'd suggest rewriting this to be more, "This section is suggested to the viewer…" in style.

Lagarto Cola/SCP-XXX-A

I'd introduce the SCP-XXX-A designation first

The only distinguishing feature of SCP-XXX-A being reptilian-like scales covering the majority of his upper torso.

If this is the only distinguishing feature of SCP-XXX-A, why is it mentioned last.

On 2009/9/10, the Foundation took action in removing SCP-XXX from the internet due to the risk of confidential information being leaked to the public.

It's not clear when the Foundation discovered the website here but the implication is that for approximately a year, the Foundation were like "eh, this isn't an issue" before deciding "wait maybe it is??".

"confidential information" also feels off here; "classified" might be better but it kinda sounds too government-y?

and reinstalled

cut this

my daily odd life

My Daily Odd Life

within the span of the

imo just us "during" here

Sincerely Lagarto Cola and Staff

I'm tempted to say it should be:

Sincerely,

Lagarto Cola and Staff

statement was released Foundation staff

comma after released

Subject referred to by SCP-XXX as Metalman6

"Subject who goes by Metalman6 on SCP-XXX"

The subject is thought to be made of oxidized copper and incapable of movement.

I feel like "appears to be" works better than "is thought to be"; and don't mention they're incapable of movement until after you mention they do workout videos.

and on the average is known

cut the "the"

Subjects videos

The subject's videos

Vocalization will usually consist of subject summarizing the days' video, subject will then dismiss itself and video will then cut shortly.

The "video, subject" part is real awkward, I think at least a "the" after the comma is needed. So is the "video will then cut shortly" part: something like "the video will be cut shortly after." or "the video ends shortly after." works better.

Metalman6's dialogue here feels, really stilted? It sounds like a politician reading a prepared script, not a comedy metal man who does fitness videos making a vid. Like there's one mention of workouts here and like, it feels like it should be a lot more tied into what he does? Y'know, have him be all "I can't show you workout people how to get buff if My Daily Odd Life goes down!" and whatever; reference what he does and why he cares.

know are website

I think the "are" is meant to be "our"

48 hours are site admins

And this "are" should be "and"

was going on.

You've missed an empty line after this

Who here remembers Odd Ones Out or Strange Music know what both these websites have in common?

"Who here remembers "Odd Ones Out" or "Strange Music"? Know what both of these websites have in common?"

the million-dollar question

why does Metalman6 use dollars. Actually, why does Metalman6 use english. It might be worth making a note somewhere about languages and translation and stuff; probably in the description?

can't see it.

Another missing line break after this

The subject referred to by SCP-XXX as TheRoseGuardian is a humanoid entity comprised of radiophones. Radiophones adhere to each other via unknown means and seem to be able to move freely.

"The subject referred to by SCP-XXX as TheRoseGuardian is a humanoid entity comprised of radiophones which adhere to each other via unknown means and seem to be able to move freely."

ingesting food do to this is believed to have a digestive system

I think you mean "due to this, they are believed" here but I'm not sure

whether or not the subject is comprised entirely of radiophones is unknown.

This clause does not flow on from the previous one at all. I'd suggest making it a new sentence and moving it before the one about about food.

The subject posts videos on cosmetics application, videos usually follow a similar format.

These two clauses do not flow together either; I would recommend dropping the second clause and moving the next sentence into this one to give something like:

The subject posts videos on cosmetics application which start with a short description of the video to come before it samples the products featured in the video.

…Also you can give subjects pronouns other than it (e.g, she, he, they); only SCP object humanoids are forced to use "it" (which is deliberate dehumanisation of a thing they have in containment).

product then rate the product

"product, before rating it"

(uh in general, don't repeat a noun a few words later or really within the same sentence unless you need to. Generally you don't need to.)

Following this subjects sums up the video and excuse itself, shortly after the video will cut.

"Following this, the subject sums up the video and excuses itself. Shortly after this, the video will cut".

gardeners, its TheRoseGuardian

it's

I Know

I know

hey Rose why are you back so early, I thought you wouldn't be coming back until the makeup drama cooled down?

I'd at least wrap this in quotation marks but I'd also be tempted to italicise.

Well truth be told I couldn't

comma after told

doing in in-depth

doing an in-depth (I think you're meant to be saying "not doing an in-depth" thing here? It's not clear).

conspiracy theories,

conspiracy theories.

A group that so little is known

"A group so unknown" or "A group so poorly known" or even "A group that so little is known about"

some of you might be wondering where did this theory even come from, You might be surprised to find out it's been around for a while.

"Some of you might be wondering where this theory came from! You might be surprised to find out that it's been around for a while!"

Know how would

Now how would

disappearing it

disappearing: it

The common denominator of every single one of these people

The common denominator of these people

fit in the

fit into the

Know,

Now

There are surely too many of us to contain.

Contain is a word that only makes sense if TheRoseGuardian knows what the Foundation does. TheRoseGuardian does not know this. I suggest "to disappear." instead; or perhaps "to make disappear." to be more explicit.

really, they

really: they

Two days pending the removal

"Two days after" (pending isn't the right choice here at all; it sounds like you mean before and it doesn't fit grammatically really)

Life Dr. Solomon

Life, Dr. Solomon

Hello, I am contacting you due to the recent removal of the website My Daily Odd Life. Looking into the recent removal of a website,

The repetition of "recent removal of (a/the) website" here is unnecessary. I suggest cutting the second one and starting the sentence with "We believe"

My Daily Life

My Daily Odd Life

Because of this the

"Because of this, the"

events concerned

"events have concerned"

We would like to prevent events like this from happening in the future.

"We would like to prevent this from happening in the future."

Thank you Lagarto Cola

"Thank you,

Lagarto Cola"

it was determined that Dr. Solomon was in no way negligent of SCP-XXX obtaining his email

"it was determined that Dr. Solomon was not responsible for SCP-XXX obtaining his email address".

It is currently unknown how SCP-XXX obtained Dr. Solomons's work email. As Dr. Solomons was not working on SCP-XXX at the time. To further communicate with SCP-XXX. Dr. Solomons's email was turned over to the on-site manager of SCP-XXX. Because SCP-XXX was actively posting information relative to SCP-XXX’s removal on its site. The foundation was unable to give any information on the nature of the Foundation removal when addressing SCP-XXX.

This whole section is a mess of partial sentences. I'm gonna suggest a full rewrite because there's not really an easy way for me to suggest fixes. That said, I'm going to note a few things: "Dr. Solomon's email address", not "Dr. Solomons's email"; "on-site manager" should be adjusted to the MTF team I suggested you reference earlier; there's a bunch of times where you use "Dr. Solomons's" but his name isn't "Solomons" it's "Solomon".

My name is Jake Scott.

Why does Dr. Solomon say his name is "Jake Scott"? This email really could do with a little context as to why it's being sent

I am part of an internet watch group, We monitor for websites and content which we believe to be unsafe for people to be exposed to.

"I am part of an internet watch group which monitors for websites and content that we believe is unsafe for people to be exposed to."

This email should really have a "Regards, (new line) Dr Solomon" at the end

When building The

When building the

when I say we

when I say that we

Following this message, all communication with SCP-XXX was ceased. Under the circumstances that any further communication with SCP-XXX could result in SCP-XXX gaining information about the Foundation.

This should be one sentence.

On 2003/16/10 My Daily Odd Life was removed from public access by unknown means proceeding this the following message was received by Dr. Somolon.

First up: the date is 6 years before the last one. Secondly, the format you're using here should be "yyyy/mm/dd"; using "yyyy/dd/mm" is needlessly confusing.

Dear Foundation staff,

cut this.

Hello, my name is Dr. Solomon overseer of the SCP Foundation we came into contact with you while a few of our researchers observed SCP-899998/My Daily Odd Life. We noticed the removal of the site and assumed that there had to be a cause for this thus coming into contact with you. I don't know what else to say other than, I am glad we're not alone out here.

Suggestion: