Another woman has come forward and publicly accused Judge Brett...

New Yorker writers Ronan Farrow and Jane Mayer pushed back Monday against the New York Times’ coverage of the latest sexual-misconduct allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

The Times reported Sunday that the reporters’ never confirmed “with other eyewitnesses” that Kavanaugh attended a Yale University dorm party where Deborah Ramirez claims he drunkenly exposed himself.

The paper said it interviewed “several dozen people” in a vain attempt to find someone with “firsthand knowledge” to corroborate Ramirez’s allegations.

The Times also said Ramirez contacted former classmates to see if they remembered the alleged incident — and told some she wasn’t sure it was Kavanaugh who exposed himself.

But in a Twitter post Monday, Farrow said it was “not accurate” for a Washington Post columnist to have tweeted that the Times “‘declined’ to publish” Ramirez’s claims, a story Farrow and Mayer broke online Sunday night.

“Their reporter pursued Ramirez aggressively. She declined to participate because she was talking exclusively to the New Yorker,” Farrow wrote.

Mayer re-tweeted Farrow’s remarks, and added that “the NYT is best paper around, but if Ramirez had talked to them on the record, and they’d found a classmate who heard the identical story at the time, and they knew Congress was investigating, and she wanted FBI to come in, the chance they wouldn’t publish is…0.”

In a statement to Washington Post columnist Erik Wemple, Times Executive Editor Dean Baquet said: “I gather some people thought we were trying to knock down her account, but that’s not what we were doing.”

“I’m not questioning their story. We’ve been competing against Ronan Farrow for a year and he’s terrific,” Baquet added.