A Republican-led, Democrat-supported bill to safeguard US elections from foreign interference is stuck in the bowels of Congress. Here’s a possible explanation: The White House doesn’t want it to pass.

The Secure Elections Act, which Sen. James Lankford (R-OK) introduced, would have made significant changes to the way states protect their voting systems in three significant ways. It proposes to:

Give security clearances to the top election official in all 50 states so they can follow real-time threats to their voting systems

Establish a formal channel among the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), other government agencies, and states to share information on the security of each state’s election

Ensure a state conducts an audit after any federal election, including incentivizing efforts to purchase electronic voting machines that retain a paper record of each ballot

That last part is crucial, as it would help states keep an accurate vote count if cyberattackers tried to manipulate or interfere with a final, electronic-only report.

The White House, however, doesn’t like the bipartisan bill. The government, and mainly DHS, “has all the statutory authority it needs to assist state and local officials to improve the security of existing election infrastructure,” Lindsay Walters, a White House spokesperson, told Yahoo News.

Citing congressional sources, Yahoo reported that that disapproval led the White House to stop further consideration of the bill in the powerful Senate Rules and Administration Committee, which oversees federal elections. On Wednesday, Sen. Roy Blunt (R-MO), the panel’s chair, abruptly canceled one of the committee sessions that would’ve led to a full Senate vote on the bill in October.

Lankford, however, told me White House pressure had nothing to do with the bill’s delay.

“I spoke to the White House yesterday and they were clear in our conversations that they did not try to block the Secure Elections Act,” he said. “There are a number of misconceptions about the bill, including the false rumor that the White House opposes the bill. I look forward to working with other members and the White House to address any concerns so we can pass the Secure Elections Act.”

Also on Wednesday, Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen requested that all state and local elections officials “make certain that by the 2020 presidential election every American votes on a verifiable and auditable ballot.”

The White House says the legislation would replicate existing authorities for DHS and would “violate the principles of federalism.” Still, it’s not a good look to squash a bill that could potentially stop Russians, Iranians, or others from interfering in federal elections.

It’s unclear if the bill is forever dead or if it will be considered again, either in its current or different form. But it goes to show that the White House doesn’t seem to take its interest in election security extremely seriously — all because of the man who sits in the Oval Office.

“A keyboard click away”

On July 27, White House press secretary Sarah Sanders said in a statement that President Donald Trump “will not tolerate foreign interference in our elections from any nation state or other malicious actors.”

That doesn’t seem to be the case. That same day, NBC News reported that “there is no coherent Trump administration strategy to combat foreign election interference — and no single person or agency in charge.”

Trump administration officials warned about this for months. When now-retired Navy Adm. Michael Rogers led US Cyber Command, he told lawmakers in February that Trump had yet to direct him to directly strike Russia’s cyber operations.

Not much has changed since then. Moscow is only “a keyboard click away” from conducting a serious cyberattack on US voting infrastructure, Dan Coats, the nation’s top spy, said on August 2 at the White House.

And it’s not just Russia the US needs to worry about. In a Sunday interview on ABC’s This Week, National Security Adviser John Bolton said the Trump administration is worried that China, North Korea, and Iran have stepped up their efforts to meddle ahead of the November vote.

“I can say definitively that it’s a sufficient national security concern about Chinese meddling, Iranian meddling, and North Korean meddling that we’re taking steps to try and prevent it,” Bolton told ABC’s Martha Raddatz. “So all four of those countries, really.”

Two days later, Facebook revealed that it removed about 650 pages, groups, and accounts it determined are part of a coordinated disinformation campaign out of Russia — and Iran. Twitter said it had suspended 284 Iran-linked accounts.

It’s undoubtedly hard to stop cyberattacks on America’s elections — former President Barack Obama struggled with it too. But there is still no White House-led, coordinated effort to stop current and future attempts — except to block bills in Congress from possibly helping.

Update: This article and its headline have been updated after a statement from Sen. Lankford.