The BBC reported yesterday that Wikipedia, the online fountain of knowledge, temporarily banned the entire nation of Qatar from accessing its articles after repeated attacks by someone in that nation on the entries on the US, sex and Muhammad.The restriction for the entire country was originally thought to be a forced necessity, due to the nature of Qatar’s internet service. Wikipedia would normally ban the offending editors IP but that isn’t possible with Qatar, as all web traffic is routed through one single IP. Wikipedia wanted to make clear that its position wasn’t to offend any particular nation, with chair of the Wikimedia Foundation, Florence Devouard telling the BBC:We did a little bit of investigating to see if we could find the offending posts in the Wiki history. In the entry for Muhammad we found this reason for deleting one new entry:Unfortunately we weren’t able to find the picture of the Arabs in the red hats and so can’t offer an opinion on the legitimacy of the ban.To clarify; the ban on Qatar only affects those without a login. Even once the ban was implemented people could still edit articles if they were from Qatar provided they logged in. Obviously most people don’t like creating a log in as that removes the opportunity for posting anonymously.In speaking with the Guardian Jimmy Wales explained the block on the entirety of Qatar was in fact an administrative error:So there you have it, Wiki will continue to have this struggle against vandals whilst it allows people to edit articles anonymously. Do you support anonymous editing? Let us know in the forums