England Calling

April 27, 2014

Without mass immigration we would not have …

1. A rapidly rising population.

2. Ethnic minority ghettoes.

3. Race relations legislation, most notably the Race Relations Act of 1976.

4. Gross interferences with free speech such as those in the 1976 Race Relations Act and 1986 Public Order Act arising from the British elite’s determination and need (from their point of view) to suppress dissent about immigration and its consequences.

5. Native Britons being charged with criminal offences and, in increasing numbers of cases, finding themselves in prison for expressing their opposition to mass immigration or for being non-PC about immigrants and British-born ethnic and racial minorities.

6. Native Britons losing their jobs simply for beings non-pc about immigration and ethnic and racial minorities.

7. Such a virulent political correctness, because the central plank of the creed – race – would have been removed or at least made insignificant. Without large numbers of racial and ethnic minorities to either act as the clients of the politically correct or to offer a threat of serious civil unrest to provide the politically correct with a reason to enact authoritarian laws banning free discussion about the effects of immigration, ‘antiracism’ would have little traction. Moreover, without the massive political leverage race has provided, political correctness in its other areas, most notably homosexuality and feminism, would have been much more difficult to inject into British society. But even if political correctness had been robbed of its dominant racial aspect whilst leaving the rest of the ideology as potent as it is now, it would be a trivial thing compared to the ideology with its dominant racial aspect intact. Changes to the status of homosexuals and women do not fundamentally alter the nature of a society by destroying its natural homogeneity. Moreover, customs and laws can always be altered peacefully. A country with large unassimilable minorities cannot be altered peacefully.

8. State sponsored multiculturalism, which is now institutionalised within British public service and the state educational system.

9. Islamic terrorism.

10. The creeping introduction of sharia law through such things as the toleration of sharia courts to settle disputes between Muslims provided both parties agree. The idea that such agreement is voluntary is highly suspect because of the pressure from within the Muslim population for Muslims to conform to sharia law and to settle disputes within the Muslim population. But even if it was always entirely voluntary, it would be wrong in principle to have an alien system of law accepted as a rival to the law of the land because inevitably it would undermine the idea of the rule of law and further isolate Muslims from the mainstream.

11. Muslims Schools which fail to conform to the national curriculum at best and at worst are vehicles for the promotion of Islamic supremacist ideas.

12. A calamitous housing shortage.

13. Housing Associations which cater solely for ethnic and racial minority groups.

14. A serious and growing shortage of school places, especially primary school places.

15. Health tourism on a huge scale.

16. Benefit tourism on a massive scale.

17 . Such crowded roads and public transport.

18. Such a low-wage economy.

19. Such high unemployment and underemployment.

20. Such a need for the taxpayer to subsidise those in work because of the undercutting of wages by immigrants.

21. Areas of work effectively off limits to white Britons because either an area of work is controlled by foreigners or British-born ethnic minorities, both of whom only employ those of their own nationality and/ or ethnicity, or unscrupulous British employers who use foreigners and ethnic minorities because they are cheap and easier to control.

22. As much crime (and particularly violent crime) because foreigners and British born blacks and Asians commit a disproportionately large proportion of UK crime (for example, see here, here and here).

23. Double standards in applying the law to the white native population and immigrants, with the white native population being frequently treated more harshly than blacks, Asians and white first-generation immigrants.

24. Female genital mutilation.

25. ‘Honour’ killings.

26. Forced marriages.

27. Widespread electoral fraud.

We would have …

1. A very homogenous country, as it used to be.

2. No fear of speaking our minds about race and immigration.

3. No fear of speaking our minds about foreigners.

4. No fear of being proud of our country and Western culture generally.

5. No people being sent to prison for simply saying what they thought about race and ethnicity.

6. Much less political correctness.

7. Equality before the law in as far as that is humanly possible.

8. A stable population.

9. Plentiful housing, both rented and for purchase, at a price the ordinary working man or woman can afford.

10. Abundant school places.

11. An NHS with much shorter waiting lists and staffed overwhelmingly with native Britons. Those who claim that the NHS would collapse without foreign staff should ask themselves one question: if that is the case, how do areas of the UK with few racial or ethnic minority people manage to recruit native-born Britons to do the work?

12. A higher-wage economy.

13. Far more native Britons in employment.

14. No areas of work effectively off limits to white Britons because either an area of work is controlled by foreigners or British-born ethnic minorities, both of whom only employ those of their own nationality and/ or ethnicity, or unscrupulous British employers who use foreigners and ethnic minorities because they are cheap and easier to control.

15. A much lower benefit bill for those of working age.

16. Substantially less crime.

17. An honest electoral system