In researching a response to another thread, I discovered that it’s now a thing for married women to charge their husbands for sex. I s~~~ you not! To quote the article –

“I don’t like sex, so I should get something out of it.”

This was how one woman – let’s call her Marie – justified charging her partner $50 any time he wanted sex more than twice a week.

But this isn’t a 50-year old mother of seven indulging her over-sexed hubby’s desires. This is a 24-year old, childless, career woman.

Australia’s own leading sex therapist, Dr Rosie King, said financial transactions or contracts could be used to encourage “decision-driven” sex, as opposed to “desire-driven” sex.

“Receiving a cash donation may increase her willingness. It’d increase my willingness,” the good doctor laughs.

So my brothers, we get a glimpse into the future of feminism. Girlfriends and wives of the future will have a cordless EFTPOS machine in their bedside top-drawer alongside their vibrator and yeast-infection cream for next time their man wants some lovin’ – besides, it’s not enough that hubby slaves his life away in some soul-destroying job so wifey can stay at home all day watching Ellen on the sofa and eating cheese-doodles so he gets more pounds to pound!

.



.

Imagine if men started keeping a spreadsheet of how much their housewives actually cost them during a life sentence marriage. Then imagine correlating it with an equivalent spreadsheet like the one this bloke kept tracking how many times his wife rejected his amorous advances;

.



.

A simple process of division between the cost of maintaining a housewife and the minutes of actual intimate activity would yield a shockingly high cost/intimacy hourly rate.

Armed with such information, young men could make better educated decisions on the pros and cons of long-term relationships and marriage and I’m sure we would see a significant uptick in short-term relationships (f~~~-buddies only), and in the use of escort and prostitution services purely based on the financial value they offer.

Such services remove the risk of continued ‘maintenance payments’ (child-support, alimony) in the likely event of a complete cessation of sexual service (divorce, loss of libido, monkey-branching). These services also grant the man the benefit of endless sex with women in the peak Sexual Market Value age range (18-28) and, if desired, an endless variety should he decide he wants to try a redhead, Latino, Asian, short, tall, etc. for pure curiosity’s sake. Variety is, after all, the spice of life.

Amazingly, in researching the subject I could not find a case where a married man had kept such such data to quantify the full hourly cost of worshiping the golden vagina.

If wives charge their husbands for sex, does this bring with it the inverse scenario where men can now calculate the financial cost of spousal maintenance and request an equivalent number of hours of sexual activity in return? To make the new ‘pay-for-play’ paradigm fair, the hours of intercourse due could be calculated according to the going female prostitution rate city-by-city and country-by-country. By these calculations, I am sure billions of husbands are owed a few months worth of ball-draining action in the sack. After all, what’s good for the goose is good for the gander ….

.



.

P.S. – As I mentioned earlier, this is a rewording of a repost of I made on another thread. On discovering the Mamamia article ‘Some wives get paid to have sex‘ in my research, my mind was blown and I thought the topic worthy of its own thread. Apologies in advance if this annoys anyone.