1 Young, L. et al. Femtosecond electronic response of atoms to ultra-intense X-rays. Nature 466, 56–61 (2010).

2 Rohringer, N. et al. Atomic inner-shell X-ray laser at 1.46 nanometres pumped by an X-ray free-electron laser. Nature 481, 488–491 (2012).

3 Bencivenga, F. et al. Four wave mixing experiments with extreme ultraviolet transient gratings. Nature 520, 205–208 (2015).

4 Singer, A. et al. Hanbury Brown–Twiss interferometry at a free-electron laser. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 034802 (2013).

5 Lehmkühler, F. et al. Single shot coherence properties of the free-electron laser SACLA in the hard X-ray regime. Sci. Rep. 4, 5234 (2014).

6 Alaimo, M. D. et al. Mapping the transverse coherence of the self amplified spontaneous emission of a free-electron laser with the heterodyne speckle method. Opt. Express 22, 30013 (2014).

7 Bachelard, R. et al. Wavefront analysis of nonlinear self-amplified spontaneous-emission free-electron laser harmonics in the single-shot regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 234801 (2011).

8 Allaria, E. et al. Highly coherent and stable pulses from the FERMI seeded free-electron laser in the extreme ultraviolet. Nature Photon. 6, 699–704 (2012).

9 Allaria, E. et al. Control of the polarization of a vacuum-ultraviolet, high-gain, free-electron laser. Phys. Rev. X 4, 041040 (2014).

10 Brumer, P. & Shapiro, M. Principles of the Quantum Control of Molecular Processes (Wiley, 2003).

11 Brumer, P. & Shapiro, M. Control of unimolecular reactions using coherent light. Chem. Phys. Lett. 126, 541–546 (1986).

12 Brif, C., Chakrabarti, R. & Rabitz, H. Control of quantum phenomena: past, present and future. New J. Phys. 12, 075008 (2010).

13 Ehlotzky, F. Atomic phenomena in bichromatic laser fields. Phys. Reports 345, 175–264 (2001).

14 Yin, Y.-Y., Chen, C., Elliott, D. S. & Smith, A. V. Asymmetric photoelectron angular distributions from interfering photoionization processes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2353 (1992).

15 Baranova, N. B. et al. Observation of an interference of one- and two-photon ionization of the sodium 4s state. JETP Lett. 55, 439–444 (1992).

16 Wang, Z.-M. & Elliott, D. S. Determination of the phase difference between even and odd continuum wave functions in atoms through quantum interference measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 173001 (2001).

17 Baranova, N. B. & Zel'dovich, B. Ya. Physical effects in optical fields with non-zero average cube, <E3> ≠ 0. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 8, 27–32 (1991).

18 Sorgenfrei, F. et al. The extreme ultraviolet split and femtosecond delay unit at the plane grating monochromator beamline PG2 at FLASH. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 81, 043107 (2010).

19 Tzallas, P., Charalambidis, D., Papadogiannis, N. A., Witte, K. & Tsakiris, G. D. Direct observation of attosecond light bunching. Nature 426, 267–271 (2003).

20 Mauritsson, J. et al. Attosecond pulse trains generated using two color laser fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 013001 (2006).

21 Paul, P. M. et al. Observation of a train of attosecond pulses from high harmonic generation. Science 292, 1689–1692 (2001).

22 Ranitovic, P. et al. Attosecond vacuum UV coherent control of molecular dynamics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 912–917 (2014).

23 Johnsson, P., Mauritsson, J., Remetter, T., L'Huillier, A. & Schafer, K. J. Attosecond control of ionization by wave-packet interference. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 233001 (2007).

24 Schumacher, D. W., Weihe, F., Muller, H. G. & Bucksbaum, P. H. Phase dependence of intense field ionization a study using two colors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1344 (1994).

25 Sasaki, S. Analyses for a planar variably-polarizing undulator. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 347, 83–86 (1994).

26 Diviacco, B., Bracco, R., Millo, D. & Musardo, M. Phase shifters for the FERMI@Elettra undulators. In Proc. IPAC 2011 3278–3280 (IPAC, 2011).

27 Zangrando, M. et al. Recent results of PADReS, the Photon Analysis Delivery and REduction System, from the FERMI FEL commissioning and user operations. J. Synch. Rad. 22, 565–570 (2015).

28 Franco, I. & Brumer, P. Minimum requirements for laser-induced symmetry breaking in quantum and classical mechanics. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 41, 074003 (2008).

29 Garcia, G. A., Nahon, L. & Powis, I. Two-Dimensional charged particle image inversion using a polar basis function Expansion. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 75, 4989–4996 (2004).

30 Grum-Grzhimailo, A. N., Gryzlova, E. V., Staroselskaya, E. I., Venzke, J. & Bartschat, K. Phys. Rev. A 91, 063418 (2015).

31 Lyamayev, V. et al. A modular end-station for atomic, molecular, and cluster science at the Low Density Matter beamline of FERMI@Elettra. J. Phys. B 46, 164007 (2013).

32 Svetina, C. et al. The Low Density Matter (LDM) beamline at FERMI: optical layout and first commissioning. J. Synch. Rad. 22, 538–543 (2015).

33 Fawley, W. M. An enhanced GINGER simulation code with harmonic emission and HDF5 IO capabilities. In Proc. FEL (eds Abo-Bakr, M. et al.) 218, abstract MOPPH07 (BESSY, 2006); http://accelconf.web.cern.ch/AccelConf/f06/PAPERS/MOPPH073.PDF

34 NIST Atomic Spectra Database (NIST, accessed 31 January 2016); http://www.nist.gov/pml/data/asd.cfm

35 Svetina, C. et al. Characterization of the FERMI@Elettra's on-line photon energy spectrometer. In Proc. SPIE Vol. 8139 (eds Morawe, C. et al.) 81390J (SPIE, 2011).

36 Mazza, T. et al. Determining the polarization state of a short-wavelength free-electron laser beam using atomic circular dichroism. Nature Commun. 5, 3648 (2014).