Quoted By:

All I'm ever going to say is this. MAYBE the SAME PEOPLE, who talk about Assange in the "present tense" are in fact, the SANE PEOPLE, who literally saved his VERY thankful ass. Think Hillary and (((they))) were kidding about droning him?! If not a drone, an unironic "terror attack" that just happened to be so unfortunately close (as planned) to the Embassy might have sufficed too, no?! I mean, you can't really drop a drone on a guy after you say it out loud in front of actual people, right?I will never confirm or deny, but, hypothetically, if a covert, exhaustive effort had been made, to "save" Assange from an intercepted, impending and immediate threat against his life, then one could ONLY ASSUME that an EQUALLY exhaustive effort, to make him disappear from ANYONE LOOKING FOR HIM, would also be made... and yes, sadly, even innocent and concerned people like you, unknowingly begging him to EXPOSE HIMSELF, via requests for the "proof of life" he could NEVER FOLLOW THROUGH ON, IN THE EXACT WAY HE TOLD YOU TO EXPECT HE WOULD, because he knew what that would ultimately lead to.See when you save and hide people, confusion is the FIRST line of defense. If not important, why not just ditch the hood and drape him in an American flag while sticking him in a car with Idaho license plates for fucke sake. Hell, maybe it wasn't Americans. Maybe it was a military ops contractor. Maybe they weren't contracted directly by the US. Maybe an ally did us a solid and came through on their promise to make it look good for the "eye witnesses". Come on, /pol/. Didn't his offer of extradition tip you off?! Didn't you find it all odd, at least by now... in 20/20 hindsight?!Point is, you don't know who took him. You don't know where they took him. You don't know what he's done since being taken and most importantly, until it's time... YOU NEVER WILL.