Download raw source

Delivered-To: john.podesta@gmail.com Received: by 10.25.24.94 with SMTP id o91csp3590400lfi; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 18:43:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.42.10.84 with SMTP id p20mr1100588icp.68.1429234997217; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 18:43:17 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <re47@hillaryclinton.com> Received: from mail-ie0-f176.google.com (mail-ie0-f176.google.com. [209.85.223.176]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k65si8083499iok.7.2015.04.16.18.43.16 for <john.podesta@gmail.com> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 16 Apr 2015 18:43:17 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of re47@hillaryclinton.com designates 209.85.223.176 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.223.176; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of re47@hillaryclinton.com designates 209.85.223.176 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=re47@hillaryclinton.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=hillaryclinton.com Received: by mail-ie0-f176.google.com with SMTP id rt8so52587059iec.0 for <john.podesta@gmail.com>; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 18:43:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=7Ff5ka/SoHIIMY7Y8lCaDlJUKt/+2Ueunsh4ZLnW8pw=; b=DD2gIcXlG2bZXBqIOrjVyNZYYcdJjtqPZcvXZdyc9V4jOIasCfLX+g6k3EH+o+EJB+ aR2Cco/SqN7VlNZFLX2u3S1qIV9QFGasHe/dSfQumQ6B5e6i+MRFkHsq5VYKBYRNClcX mFJN2OpIGqRdGQcLwbLgoMMXsbDpjfIvFuO8HTPhgDvIfZQh59Af1L5zVxi7wjOS35DG t/nW29OYMKw6YmxQljx0bOidW9/rvLRMvTNUlEtUwpjshAZoOCxGtmyBGkkwwrbOeVSu OCD+zGsYBdJBQ3s6z7q/uf3xuM2R45KMckBMOG8jqlP36Bi9dec1IRJvWJe51eZTOPzG aNTw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkk+R7m63rtshhA1Nroy3QfUYp3Zmz0d85tlGl/ioGil/MYEJ+a/riCiYycAKhVgVYfynwk MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.45.103 with SMTP id l7mr1304552igm.41.1429234996457; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 18:43:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.113.138 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 18:43:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <43BFDC4A-3180-43D5-93AA-D32368C05982@gmail.com> References: <2269a89a47075f737ad07e50d6791746@mail.gmail.com> <43BFDC4A-3180-43D5-93AA-D32368C05982@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 18:43:16 -0700 Message-ID: <CAMhPeA8M7EAjQtvp_0P8hThGrDN==MCJ+ysFrqGbrwnek-fmoA@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Trade Statement From: Robby Mook <re47@hillaryclinton.com> To: Jake Sullivan <jake.sullivan@gmail.com> CC: Dan Schwerin <dschwerin@hillaryclinton.com>, Jennifer Palmieri <jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com>, Kristina Schake <kschake@hillaryclinton.com>, Marlon Marshall <mmarshall@hillaryclinton.com>, John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0111b1b643e3940513e1b470 --089e0111b1b643e3940513e1b470 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Two thoughts: 1) I wouldn't mention prior support. I only see downside to that. 2) I would just do the first paragraph--or just add a sentence onto it about the enviro, labor stuff. I think it's a bit longer than it needs to be right now. On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Jake Sullivan <jake.sullivan@gmail.com> wrote: > One thought: do we need a sentence acknowledging her prior support for > TPP? > > Hillary has been on record in favor of an outcome that meets both these > tests. But we should be willing to walk away from an outcome that falls > short. > > Or Robby is that a problem? > > On Apr 16, 2015, at 9:01 PM, Dan Schwerin <dschwerin@hillaryclinton.com> > wrote: > > How does this look to everyone? > > > > Hillary believes that any new trade measure has to pass two tests: First, > does it put us in a position to protect American workers, raise wages and > create more good jobs at home? Second, does it also strengthen our nation= al > security? We should be willing to walk away from any outcome that falls > short of these tests. The goal is greater prosperity and security for > American families, not trade for trade=E2=80=99s sake. > > > > Hillary will be watching closely to see the result of a number of pivotal > questions yet to be decided, including what is being done to crack down o= n > currency manipulation and unfair competition by state-owned enterprises; = to > improve labor rights and protect the environment, public health, and acce= ss > to life-saving medicines; and to open new opportunities for our family > farms and small businesses to export their products and services overseas= . > And, as Hillary warned in her book, Hard Choices, we shouldn=E2=80=99t be= giving > special rights to corporations at the expense of workers and consumers. > Getting these things right will go a long way toward ensuring that trade > will be a net plus for everyday Americans. > > --089e0111b1b643e3940513e1b470 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr">Two thoughts:<div>1) I wouldn't mention prior support.= =C2=A0 I only see downside to that.</div><div>2) I would just do the first = paragraph--or just add a sentence onto it about the enviro, labor stuff.=C2= =A0 I think it's a bit longer than it needs to be right now.</div></div= ><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, Apr 16, = 2015 at 6:09 PM, Jake Sullivan <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:jake= .sullivan@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">jake.sullivan@gmail.com</a>></spa= n> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;b= order-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"auto"><div>One thou= ght: do we need a sentence acknowledging her prior support for TPP? =C2=A0= =C2=A0</div><div><br></div><div>Hillary has been on record in favor of an o= utcome that meets both these tests.=C2=A0 But we should be willing to walk = away from an outcome that falls short.=C2=A0<br><br>Or Robby is that a prob= lem?</div><span class=3D""><div><br>On Apr 16, 2015, at 9:01 PM, Dan Schwer= in <<a href=3D"mailto:dschwerin@hillaryclinton.com" target=3D"_blank">ds= chwerin@hillaryclinton.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div></span><div><div cla= ss=3D"h5"><blockquote type=3D"cite"><div><div><p class=3D"MsoNormal">How do= es this look to everyone?</p><p class=3D"MsoNormal">=C2=A0</p><p class=3D"M= soNormal">Hillary believes that any new trade measure has to pass two tests= : First, does it put us in a position to protect American workers, raise wa= ges and create more good jobs at home? Second, does it also strengthen our = national security?=C2=A0 We should be willing to walk away from any outcome= that falls short of these tests.=C2=A0 The goal is greater prosperity and = security for American families, not trade for trade=E2=80=99s sake. </p><p = class=3D"MsoNormal">=C2=A0</p><p class=3D"MsoNormal">Hillary will be watchi= ng closely to see the result of a number of pivotal questions yet to be dec= ided, including what is being done to crack down on currency manipulation a= nd unfair competition by state-owned enterprises; to improve labor rights a= nd protect the environment, public health, and access to life-saving medici= nes; and to open new opportunities for our family farms and small businesse= s to export their products and services overseas.=C2=A0 And, as Hillary war= ned in her book, Hard Choices, we shouldn=E2=80=99t be giving special right= s to corporations at the expense of workers and consumers.=C2=A0 Getting th= ese things right will go a long way toward ensuring that trade will be a ne= t plus for everyday Americans.</p></div> </div></blockquote></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div> --089e0111b1b643e3940513e1b470--