With all the hoopla going around about the GTX 1080, the charts that Nvidia displayed rubbed me the wrong way. I've no doubt that Nvidiawhen they showed the graphs, it's just that trying to get any actual meaning from them was really hard to come by.So that's why I decided to take the chart and try to make some sense out of it. Right now, this is what I got:When you see that a 1080 is 103% faster than a 960, that means it'sas fast. Additionally, a 1080 being 20% faster than a Titan X means that it is 1.2x faster.There will obviously be differences per game, but right now I think it's probably within the scope that you could take a look at Titan X benches and multiply them by 1.2 and you'd get 1080 benches.So how did I get these numbers? Well I had to measure the pixels and then kind of eyeball where they were on the graph to feel comfortable with determining a number from the Y-axis.Then if we multiple the Y-axis by 20 to make it 100 and we can get the other numbers:and from there we could just get the % difference:Now that I had these numbers, I decided to take a look at the only other numbers that Nvidia shared, which was Witcher 3 and Tomb Raider benches. The really interesting bit is that if you look atthe % diff between a 980 and a titan isand when I went looking for recent Witcher 3 benches (which I found here: http://www.gamersnexus.net/guides/1970-gtx-980-ti-sli-benchmark-vs-sli-980-titan-x/Page-2 ) you'll see this:Which is a third-party benchmark that shows the Titan X and 980 having adifference.I put up my video a few hours ago and someone already showed me where my math was wrong. In my video I show this:Basically, when I measured the pixels on the game benches located on Nvidia's website. A full bar was 108px wide and the Tomb Raider bar was 82px wide and the Witcher bar is 72px wide.to make the graph equal 100, I had to multiply 108x0.0741. And when you multiply 82px by 0.0741 you get 6, which is what I put in the graph. What I was supposed to do wasAnyhoo the correct information is:1.75x for Tombraider which is 93FPS at 1080 which I showed 85 originally.1.66x For Witcher 3 which is 43FPS at 4K which I showed 40 originally.which shows a 1080 having 2x the performance of a Titan X. People are misinterpreting this chart because Nvidia is comparing a 1080 with Pascal's VR feature to do a sceneIt's a very devious chart.Also,It'll be interesting to see where things are when benchmarks actually surface. But for now, we can use these as a general % to apply to other benches and get an idea of where the 1080 will be., it might not be a huge difference but it's something to think about.