Download raw source

Delivered-To: john.podesta@gmail.com Received: by 10.25.24.71 with SMTP id o68csp353932lfi; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 12:30:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.112.110.231 with SMTP id id7mr40561918lbb.28.1426188658029; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 12:30:58 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <matt@algpolling.com> Received: from public3-exrmfnj1-3.serverdata.net (public3-exrmfnj1-3.serverdata.net. [206.225.165.38]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r2si5107079lbb.46.2015.03.12.12.30.57 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 12 Mar 2015 12:30:58 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of matt@algpolling.com designates 206.225.165.38 as permitted sender) client-ip=206.225.165.38; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of matt@algpolling.com designates 206.225.165.38 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=matt@algpolling.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by exrmfnj1-3.serverdata.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49EFC45892C; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 12:30:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Relayed-From: 10.254.254.71 X-Relayed-From-Added: Yes X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at exrmfnj1-3.serverdata.net Received: from public3-exrmfnj1-3.serverdata.net ([10.240.128.89]) by localhost (exrmfnj1-3.serverdata.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qXWCoG2eZ0eW; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 12:30:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from exmr-vx1-2.serverpod.net (exmr-vx1-2.serverpod.net [10.254.254.71]) by exrmfnj1-3.serverdata.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EF884585A2; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 12:30:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from HUB031-CO-4.exch031.domain.local (unknown [10.224.113.49]) by exmr-vx1-2.serverpod.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 069783C766; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 12:30:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from MBX031-W1-CO-6.exch031.domain.local ([10.224.113.72]) by HUB031-CO-4.exch031.domain.local ([10.224.113.49]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 12:30:53 -0700 From: Matt Hogan <matt@algpolling.com> To: John Anzalone <john@algpolling.com>, Jim Margolis <Jim.Margolis@gmmb.com> CC: Mandy Grunwald <gruncom@aol.com>, Robby Mook <robbymook2015@gmail.com>, Joel Benenson <jbenenson@bsgco.com>, Jennifer Palmieri <jennifer.m.palmieri@gmail.com>, John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com>, Kristina Schake <kristinakschake@gmail.com>, Huma Abedin <huma@hrcoffice.com>, David Binder <david@db-research.com>, Teddy Goff <teddy@precisionstrategies.com>, Elan Kriegal <elan.kriegel@bluelabs.com>, Mona Thinavongsa <Mona@algpolling.com>, Jeff Liszt <jeff@algpolling.com>, "Pia Nargundkar" <Pia@algpolling.com> Subject: RE: Clinton email toplines Thread-Topic: Clinton email toplines Thread-Index: AQHQXHWQvQFrs0lT9kCfES2uxJtoNZ0YzILPgAB3zwD//459e4AADeexgABazDA= Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 19:30:53 +0000 Message-ID: <52A07E91ECADAE408B1CB500CC02E8626BE0BA47@mbx031-w1-co-6.exch031.domain.local> References: <CACEywDJoOqwH5AB=HAt+DOWeYVs=_kFyzAOjrYk6BXviBbdMuw@mail.gmail.com> <E28E31F8-B4BB-470F-8661-AA63276E600B@algpolling.com>,<028ACDEF-D9D6-476B-9F0D-62C5E8C75BE1@aol.com>,<0BB511CE-88C2-4A53-9ED4-A1C2C24A5EC7@gmmb.com> <C80D995D-98A8-4FD7-9F0B-F7141227ED11@algpolling.com> In-Reply-To: <C80D995D-98A8-4FD7-9F0B-F7141227ED11@algpolling.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [209.194.9.236] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CMAE-Score: 0 X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=ca+KNQ/M c=1 sm=1 a=lhpwQro_NrcA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=D8ikcw6IAAAA:8 a=emO1SXQWCLwA:10 a=WJvzc8IIAAAA:8 a=3oc9M9_CAAAA:8 a=ard7eB9QMfam2gXGcz0A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=jLrMpxUXvkwA:10 a=A4Eg3tGXNCUA:10 a=QOQr3hJYs0cA:10 a=hZ2BIe_3TokiqmeG:21 a=sylKzJXwfud30-LI:21 a=Hg80ZWjARWgEz5ezofG2iQ==:117 To Mandy's question on who the 7% are that mentioned "emails" in the open-e= nded q on what concerned them most: Partisan-wise they are basically the same as the electorate overall. Demographically, they are more likely to be female (61%), skewing towards o= lder, college educated women.=20 They are a little more likely to be Fox News watchers (31% vs. 26% voters o= verall) Regionally they are less likely to live in the south than voters overall bu= t otherwise don't differ much.=20 -----Original Message----- From: John Anzalone=20 Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 10:00 AM To: Jim Margolis Cc: Mandy Grunwald; Robby Mook; Joel Benenson; Jennifer Palmieri; John Pode= sta; Kristina Schake; Huma Abedin; David Binder; Teddy Goff; Elan Kriegal; = Mona Thinavongsa; Jeff Liszt; Matt Hogan; Pia Nargundkar Subject: Re: Clinton email toplines We will be able to profile the 7% once we get some tabs.=20 To Jim's inquiry, the construct of the question was designed to weed out t= hose who would never vote for who so that 7% is probably a real number and = not insignificant but also not overwhelming. When you add it to the 10% wh= o are still processing this issue and maybe waiting if there is more too it= then it shows this is a pretty big chunk of voters. Winning over those 10= % becomes our challenge. If there is no new twist to the story naturally w= e probably win them over on other issues=20 John Anzalone Anzalone Liszt Grove Research 334-387-3121. Office @AnzaloneLiszt > On Mar 12, 2015, at 8:10 AM, Margolis, Jim <Jim.Margolis@gmmb.com> wrote: >=20 > And is 7% starting to mean something if it is among up for grabs? >=20 > Jim Margolis > Sent from my iPhone.=20 > Please excuse typos. >=20 >> On Mar 12, 2015, at 8:56 AM, Mandy Grunwald <gruncom@aol.com> wrote: >>=20 >> Any idea who that 7% is -- demographically and geographically? >>=20 >> Mandy Grunwald >> Grunwald Communications >> 202 973-9400 >>=20 >>=20 >>> On Mar 12, 2015, at 8:47 AM, John Anzalone <john@algpolling.com> wrote: >>>=20 >>> I am on a board of a company called Civic Science that does about a hal= f a million internet interviews a day nationwide across multiple platforms.= They asked a question yesterday to gauge the impact the email story might= be having on voters. as you see below about 7% say it bothers them enough= to reconsider their vote. Another 10% are still trying to sort it out. W= e will keep it up for a couple of days to see if we see any movement. Inte= restingly enough 7% is about the number who "volunteered" the email controv= ersy in our nationwide polls as something that bothers or concerns them abo= ut HRC. >>>=20 >>> Raw results are below but we will be getting some crosstabs later. >>>=20 >>> John Anzalone >>> Anzalone Liszt Grove Research >>> 334-387-3121 >>>=20 >>> PLEASE NOTE NEW EMAIL ADDRESS: john@ALGpolling.com=20 >>> www.ALGpolling.com >>>=20 >>> twitter: @AnzaloneLiszt >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> Here you go. 70% of Dems said the issue is being blown out of proporti= on, 15% said they haven't made up their mind yet, and 5% weren't familiar w= ith the issue. Almost half of people under age 30 said they were unfamiliar= with issue altogether, for whatever that's worth. >>> <image.png> >=20