It is rather biased that the authors do not consider at all population control. Wouldn't it be much easier than both considered *global* approaches, to urge population control and contemplate its problems in the most problematic areas?



What is it that --supposedly-- forces a global perspective to the problem? Who has decided that economies must be dependent and reliant on foreign and even global provision, for their "food-security", instead of responsible and self-sufficient? What is the argument that supports that globalisation and "market efficiency" can compensate any kind of behaviour and lack of responsibility? Aren't the authors arguing on a line against their proposed MSF solution, in this way?



PS: Btw, economic incentives are a far better approach to birth control, than the culturally biased pressure for "women reproductive rights".