READER COMMENTS ON

"90-Year-Old Won't Be Voting Today"

(13 Responses so far...)





COMMENT #1 [Permalink]

... Robert Lee said on 11/3/2009 @ 2:33 pm PT...



I take it, then, that you believe every name on the voter rolls is valid. Every fraudulent vote disenfranchises a valid vote. There is little doubt that there are more fraudulent votes than there are registered voters who weren't allowed to vote due to lack of ID.

COMMENT #2 [Permalink]

... ProgressiveMews said on 11/3/2009 @ 4:04 pm PT...



"Some N.J. voters still running into problems at polling places, monitors say"

COMMENT #3 [Permalink]

... Brad Friedman said on 11/3/2009 @ 4:30 pm PT...



Robert Lee said:

I take it, then, that you believe every name on the voter rolls is valid.

Nope. There's a lot of dead wood, as everyone agrees, which is (one of the reasons) why there have been so many purges in those roles since the state computer database registration has been required by HAVA.

How many of those deadwood registrants "vote"? Almost none, as all legitimate experts, as well as DoJ reports, tend to agree.

Every fraudulent vote disenfranchises a valid vote.

Yup. And every voter disenfranchised by overly draconian restrictions disenfranchises a valid vote and robs an American of their rights.

There is little doubt that there are more fraudulent votes than there are registered voters who weren't allowed to vote due to lack of ID.

"Little doubt" by who? Fox "News" viewers who've been lied to about it? Perhaps, but nobody else who actually knows what they're talking about. FAR more voters are disenfranchised by suppressing legal votes than by non-existant voters voting. It's not even close. Unless, of course, you're a Fox "News" viewer and believe in John Fund and Glenn Beck more than actual SCIENCE and stuff.

But you are welcome to continue your delusions as you like. Sadly, the result is Americans denied of their democratic rights.