Having directed the likes of Drive, Bronson and Only God Forgives, Nicolas Winding Refn has gradually become one of Europe’s most polarising filmmakers.

Take The Neon Demon, for example. Released earlier this year, the initial critical reaction saw one reviewer award the film five stars while another yelled “Trash!” at the cinema screen.

Like his films, the director himself is quite divisive. In an interview with a reporter from The Independent before the release of The Neon Demon, Refn refused to speak about the upcoming project despite the synopsis and a poster having been released. Then, when interviewed alongside the film’s leading actor, Elle Fanning, he remained characteristically quiet.

When I meet the director to discuss the film's DVD release, there’s an intensity in the air. As you may be able to tell from the transcript below, the 46-year-old made for a quite odd interview experience, offering more questions than answers and often allowing silences between the two of us to be drawn out for extended periods of time. Thankfully, Refn gave some revealing answers about the film, proffering some interesting information about his entire filmmaking process.

Hi, Nicolas. Really enjoyed The Neon Demon. The whole thing has a very occult feel, the three ‘villains’ being very witch-like. Was that your intention?

Yes. They were like the Aleister Crowley disciples. The whole movie was very much designed around the witchcraft ceremony.

Elle Fanning in ‘The Neon Demon’ (Courtesy Everett Collection/Rex/Shutterstock)

What was the inspiration for that?

I wanted to make a film about beauty, and the power of it. If you go through our history, our culture, our mythology, beauty has always been a very dominating factor in our culture. I have two daughters, so I read a lot of fairy tales and beauty is very much a common definition of women. And their power over men is strong. But, with the invention of the fitness centre, physical strength lost a lot of its importance but beauty remained. Beauty is like a new class system. The world is so obsessed with beauty, it has been for the last 2,000 years, it’s the one stock that’s never gone down, the one stock that’s never gone out of fashion. The longevity of beauty has continued to shrink. It's becoming younger and younger, so, eventually, it will always feed on itself, don’t you think?

It’s interesting that you say beauty gives women power over men because, in the film, it seems the men have power over women. For instance, the photographer dismisses the other models when he doesn’t like their look. Or Keanu Reeves’ character. Is that a reversal you wanted to make?

It’s an interesting question because the photographer is only a gateway, he’s not the consumer. The men in the film have no other function other than being servants of the story. The film isn’t about men and women but purely about women where the men have no real function. I don’t think the photographer has any power over women, he’s just a facilitator of a stereotype that the feeding machine wants to eat. But who essentially is eating? Certainly not the men. It’s the women.

The men are gate-masters to facilitating those women going out there.

Yes, but they’re not in control of it. That’s the difference.

Supply and demand, basically.

Yeah, that’s all it is. There’s no difference between how a male photographer or a female photographer would tell models to go away or stay.

How come you cast the photographers as men?

Because it was more interesting in terms of the horror undertone. Her always being vulnerable in a predatorily way.

Elle Fanning’s character [Jesse] is very driven, yet is sometimes naive as well. Is that perhaps what you see in people coming to Hollywood?

Is she naive, though? In an early scene, at the modelling agency, she is asked who took the photographs and replies ‘Oh, just some guy online’. Then, later in the film, he endearingly asks whether the photos came up at the meeting and she lies. The question is, is she manipulating? Naive? Is she Dorothy? She’s many things. Is she self-aware?

She’s self-assured.

When Sarah [Abbey Lee Kershaw’s character] asks, ‘What’s it like being the sun?’ she very matter-of-fact says, ‘Everything you’re not’. When Gigi [Bella Heathcote’s character] reveals all the plastic surgery she’s had to make her beautiful, she defends it by saying no one really likes the way she looks, and Jesse replies, ‘I do’. Every scene has a curl. Sometimes very clear, sometimes not.

Elle’s character is this beautiful woman, yet even when she interacts with this young photographer there is nothing sexual. But then, when she later drives with him after getting into the agency, she’s almost aroused by that victory.

That’s the beginning of the narcissism. You need sexuality, or you need non-sexuality, you need to be very clear. There’s no overt sexuality in the Jesse character because she’s partly a girl becoming a woman who fears penetration. She’s uncertain what she can do, yet she plays in a world of wolves. She’s the lamb, but she’s the one leading them.

Regarding the triangles. Each point, presumably, represents one of the three ‘witches’. [He nods] And the triangles surround her, like the witches?

Yes, like in a ritual. They fence in the lamb, capture her. Then they feed off the lamb.

As the film progresses, the colours are quite drastic, particularly the reds and blues. You're also colour blind: is that something that affects your filmmaking?

I like extremes. The more extreme, the more interesting it becomes.

What meanings did you apply to each colour?

Whatever feels right. For me, it works purely on what I would like to see. Like an infant doing a drawing, I try to make it very simple.

But it still serves a purpose.

Yes. But the purpose is unknown to me until the film is done.

Is that not difficult going into a film?

Well, I shoot in chronological order because of that. So I can see the movie unfold in front of me. I can change it. Mutate it. I can continue. It is like being a painter.

Do people you’re working with ever find that frustrating?

I think, at the beginning, some people can find it frightening, because it's a bit like creative free-fall. But I think creativity breeds on fear.

Fear of?

Fear of failure.

Is that what you fear?

Yeah. I think you have to put yourself in a situation that is so dire. The greatest artists were in a situation where they had to pay their bills. That’s a very convenient way to get very creative very fast. It’s very important to have that constant fear around you. For many years, it was about money, because I never had any money. Things are a little bit different now, so I have to create another kind of fear. Failure.

The best films of 2016 (so far) Show all 22 1 /22 The best films of 2016 (so far) The best films of 2016 (so far) Creed This empowering spin-off sequel to the Rocky franchise sees Sylvester Stallone return as the personal trainer to Odonis Creed (Michael B. Jordan), the son of his old rival-turned-compadre Apollo (Carl Weathers). Barry Wetcher The best films of 2016 (so far) Room A grandstanding adaptation of the Emma Donoghue novel. At Room's heart is two towering performances from Brie Larson and Jacob Tremblay as a mother and son who find freedom after being locked away by in a boxed building for years. The best films of 2016 (so far) The Big Short Plenty of The Big Short's charm is manifested in the way that it takes a clunky story (the 2007-8 financial crisis) and transforms it into a cinematic experience. The best films of 2016 (so far) Spotlight The facts speak for themselves in this Oscar-winning biographical film about four investigative journalists who uncover a scandal of child molestation in the Catholic church. Strong performances and a firm directorial presence in Tom McCarthy make Spotlight a worthy recipient of this year's Best Picture Oscar. The best films of 2016 (so far) Bone Tomahawk The best films of 2016 (so far) Anomalisa Paramount Pictures The best films of 2016 (so far) The Witch Take any shot from Robert Eggers' assured debut - based on a New England folktale - and your spine will tingle. A masterclass in understatedness. The best films of 2016 (so far) 10 Cloverfield Lane If you're going to unveil a secret sequel-of-sorts to 2008 hit Cloverfield, this is how you do it. Essentially a chamber piece set in the same world of Matt Reeves' original, 10 Cloverfield Lane will hold you in a vicelike grip until its closing frame. The best films of 2016 (so far) High-Rise Ben Wheatley's fifth feature as director may not be to everyone's tastes but, should you be up to it, there's a lot to take away from this adaptation of J.G. Ballard's dystopian tale. The best films of 2016 (so far) Zootropolis Despite strong competition in the form of Finding Dory and Kubo and the Two Strings, Zootropolis - named Zootopia in the US - takes the trophy of 2016's greatest animated film. The best films of 2016 (so far) Victoria The best films of 2016 (so far) Captain America: Civil War Even those who aren't invested in superhero films will have a hard time keeping their breath in several of Civil War's action sequences. The best films of 2016 (so far) Son of Saul The haunting winner of the Best Foreign Language Oscar, Son of Saul's technical mastery (courtesy of first-time director László Nemes) is backed up by a harrowingly real portrayal of life within a Nazi concentration camp. Sony Pictures Entertainment The best films of 2016 (so far) Everybody Wants Some!! Richard Linklater followed Boyhood with this charming coming-of-age story that bears similarity with 1993's Dazed and Confused. This time, our ensemble are a group of baseball-playing college freshmen. In the upper echelons of the year's best. The best films of 2016 (so far) Green Room The best films of 2016 (so far) Sing Street The best films of 2016 (so far) Love and Friendship The best films of 2016 (so far) Suburra The best films of 2016 (so far) The Neon Demon The best films of 2016 (so far) Hell or High Water The best films of 2016 (so far) Kubo and the Two Strings The best films of 2016 (so far) Hunt for the Wilderpeople

It’s interesting that you work off the cuff because the shots in your films, like Elle’s character, are so self-assured.

Because I force myself to react purely on my instinct. It’s like the trick, the game. I have to make that instinct as pure as I can because that is success. That is something that can never be taken away from me. That’s my choice. If you love it or hate it, I don’t care, because I did it exactly how I wanted to do it. That probably means it is going to polarise. Polarisation is good because then you have been violated. Violation means you have an emotional reaction to it and that’s the essence of creativity. Good or bad, that’s your Chinese dinner. We spend so much time talking about art being good or bad, or what’s it worth. It’s like, those words have no meaning in creativity. It’s just us trying to create a standard.

I guess when people describe things these days, especially in the internet age, it feels like there is so much hyperbole thrown around, people using extremes to explain things. Are you against that?

No, I’m all for it. I think the internet is the greatest invention since women.

Have you always worked on instinct when making your films?

I started on my first film because I read John Cassavetes did it on his films. I really loved The Killing of a Chinese Bookie and thought ‘If he can do it, I can do it’. Then it became a mantra, a dogma of the process.