Today the good ole folks at Gallup have taken the criticisms of the fab-five-at-fox to a whole "nuther" level. Aside: I've always wanted to put "nuther" in something.

You see, they did a study of Republicans who watch Fox and cousin, you "gots" to check it:

They found with "unrefudiatinized" evidence--(sorry, I sometimes slip into my Barracuda mode) that Newt Gingrich has a much higher rating among Fox viewers than republicans who don't watch the network.

Hmmm, shall we say, unethical or in-kind donation or should we just look out for the next 11 million Crooked-Roger will pay to elect some GOP candidate?

As you know, Fox courageously (actually, not so much) suspended two of their five presidential hopefuls but Politico says "that Gingrich may already have gotten what he needed out of Fox – viewers of the network are more likely to support him than are Republicans at large." http://www.politico.com/...

Okay, um--that's unethical.

I also applaud Gallup for punching Roger in the nose with their little summary nugget:

"Given that viewership of the channel is common among Republicans, Fox News provides a unique opportunity for possible Republican candidates to raise their profile and increase their potential support. There have been discussions about how ethical it is to have potential candidates on its payroll, and the network seemed to be sensitive to those concerns by suspending Gingrich and Santorum Wednesday."

http://www.gallup.com/...

Good job Gallup on your analysis but let me just tell the folks the real deal: Fox is not a legitimate news outlet, they completely run the GOP and all Republican presidential candidates are selected solely by Roger Ailes.