David and Goliath was an early expression of Judaeo-Christian morality that attempted to instruct that the power of God was an absolute moral force that backs the small, weak, meek, shepherd David to kill the large, strong, soldier, Goliath.

Intersectionality is an attempt to use the power of Academia and Science as the publicly recognised authority on knowledge to ‘prove’ Judaeo-Christian morality. Academia/Science is the current authority of knowledge in the world. It is natural and normal for Judaeo-Christian morality to seek and establish authority for itself depending on what society and culture designates as authority.

Marxism was an attempt to use the power of Economics as the publicly recognised authority on Money, to ‘prove’ Judaeo-Christian morality. Marx is open in admitting that he considers money the pre-eminent cultural artefact of power (for Marx, money is ‘God’), so Economics is the authority he invokes. (Or that Judaeo-Christian morality invokes, through him)

Christianity was an attempt to use the power of God, as the publicly recognised authority on the natural world (at the time) to ‘prove’ Judaeo-Christian morality. God was the pre-eminent authority available at the time Christianity developed.

David and Goliath fantasizes about the size and threat of Goliath (and the small, meek status of David to contrast)

Intersectionality has enemies who are fantasized about, Racists, Misogynists, Rapists, Men. White people, White Men, White Women contrasted with small, meek, morally superior victims in Minorities, Gays, Women, Illegal immigrants.

Marxism has enemies who are fantasized about, Capitalists, Bourgeoisie, contrasted with the virtuous worker.

Christianity has enemies who are fantasized about, Satan, The Devil who is responsible for sins through the individual that torture Jesus, the original victim-beyond-reproach.

In this morality, the status and objectification of both Evil object and Morally Pure object must be firmly established, and protected. The results of this objectification and contrast are as follows.

For David and Goliath, we have the weak David killing the strong Goliath.

For intersectionality, we have affirmative action, female quotas, minority quotas

For Marxism, we have ‘the proletariat should seize the means of production’

For Christianity we have ‘the meek shall inherit the earth’

The logic of David and Goliath is corrupted when David is more powerful and kills Goliath. The objectification of them both allows this as the morally ‘right’ outcome that God makes sure of.

The logic is corrupted for intersectionality, when Race/gender becomes of utmost importance in objectifying individuals. The objectification of the ‘good’ race and the ‘bad’ race makes advantaging and disadvantaging people for their race to be ok. They create un-natural and unscientific social constructions to combat social construction. The moral implications make this corruption ok.

The logic is corrupted for Marxism, when a conspiracy of an elite hoarding capital is fixed with an elite hoarding capital. The objectification of capitalists as evil people taking advantage of the workers is replaced by an entire government structure of an elite taking advantage of workers. The objectification of the ‘good’ Communist/Socialist politician allows this, compared with the ‘Evil’ of the capitalist.

The logic is corrupted for Christianity when it claims that ‘the meek shall inherit the earth’. We know that the meek do not inherit the earth. Christianity invents heaven/hell, good and evil and Gods judgement to get this concept passed.

This morality identifies power disparities with a presumptive correctional mechanism – that it is true, proper and correct that the party perceived as weaker should defeat the party perceived as stronger. In fact this mechanism is expressed as an absolute morality, which is the same as saying that it is expressed with a literal belief in the power of a God. What is actually seen as powerful or not reflects the attitudes of the prevailing culture.

Christianity is the only ideology that ever managed to successfully yoke the power of this morality through a complex mechanism that linked the individual and their sin to the torment of Jesus, the morally perfect object of pity. Being capable of harming the son of God, the individual became both very important, also very conscious of not adding to the harm of their object of pity, and also opening the door for a type of sado-masochistic pleasure in doing evil, by Judeao-Christian standards. Inevitably fetishizing sin and aggrandizing the natural ‘good’ and ‘bad’ heuristic judgement into ‘divine’ and ‘evil’, it warped the world around it. God was watching your sins, and you were making Jesus suffer.

Without the authority of an external, mysterious and abstract ‘God’, all of the social movements that form around this morality are the same. This morality slowly changes the world around it to imbue meaning into people, creating objects out of them and herding them into groups. There are always religious overtones – this totalitarian morality creates the impression of a good versus evil story.

The morality acts like a perceptual virus, it becomes a pre-supposition in generating personal reality. The individuals infected reality cannot be understood from the perspective of a logical and consistent systematic reality. The individual ignores the inconsistencies as this morality makes them sympathetic to a passive-aggressive logic that gives rise to the morality to begin with.

Judaeo-Christian morality creates objects of people and things and establishes qualitative value in them so that a new, twisted and ultimately self-contradicting logic may be established. This is the inevitable weakness of the ideology – it is unstable, degenerative, irrational and doomed to fail.

The passive-aggression at the core of the logic of the morality is due to the individuals lack of power in their life. Instead of adjusting to reality, they fantasize with reasoning that has an external locus of control.

As members of the herd (as opposed to individuals), they seek external authority for the growing power of this mechanism, and grasp it from whatever cultural and social sources of authority they are allowed to claim. This authority is used as credibility – ironically enough it is credibility that they simultaneously assault. The evil in their enemy is a projection.

Being able to divine the morally correct conclusions of this morality using available cultural and social objects gives a person a Priestly status – their goodness and authority is established in spite of obvious corruptions to their stated set of aims.

Marxists are obsessed with money and so they crave the power to control the economic system, something that they allege of their opponents.

Feminists seek to establish an ordered and entrenched bias against the opposite sex, something that they allege their opponents to do.

Racial justice warriors seek biased social conditions towards somebody based on their racial characteristics, something that they allege their opponents to do.

Of course, Marxists and Feminists are consciously acting as an established group identity while their opponents are identified as a ‘group’ but have never attempted to act as a group or subvert the pre-eminence of the individual.

Marxists see capitalists as financial parasites but end up as corrupt government officials themselves, siphoning all that they can from the public, through the government. The absolute morality and the narrative they are seen to control give them an absolute

Feminists project specific gender-hating conspiratorial social construction leveraging systematic control but end up constructing a specific gender-hating systematic bias leveraging systematic control.

They attain positions of authority to inflict punitive punishment and to punish others who break their code. In this code they are projecting all of their own intentions into their scape-goat. They are the thing they are against, and in this degenerate and totalitarian-morality ideology they all become the thing they hate. After all, it was a projection of their own beliefs into an ‘external’ object that they were fighting all along

Russian Deaths – 20 million (14 million sent to prison camps)

Chinese Deaths – 45 million

Cambodian Deaths – 2.5 million

Bulgaria – 50,000 to 100,000

Vietnam – 100,000

North Korea – 2,000 000

Laos – 100,000

Ethiopa – 500,000

Intersectionality would have had a similar ending if it was allowed.