This has its drawbacks. Basically, user transfers his funds in custody to a 3rd party (and we all know that trusted 3rd parties are security holes, thanks to Nick Szabo). But how much of a problem is that? Let’s think a bit about it. Trust is minimized to an absolute minimum required to carry its duties. On the other hand, Lightning is expected for day-to-day use, and how much the average user usually has in his pocket for daily expenses? Probably, $50 for groceries and coffee? A fair tradeoff risking those for an exchange of usability.

Of course, on-chain Bitcoins private keys should be in full user’s control. Not your keys — not your coins, as they say. We are thinking of it as “savings” account (as opposed to Lightning — “current” account).

Other drawbacks include centralisation of the network. Given lots of users start using LndHub, amount of funds and liquidity it holds will also grow, turning LndHub into a major Hub on the network. This was anticipated in the dawn of Lightning development, and we don’t see a problem with that. Network still remains open, and is free to morph and mutate as per current economic reality.

Luckily, LndHub is completely opensource, which means any tech-savvy user can deploy his own instance of LndHub and use it with his wallet. This instance can even be shared with the party, such as friends and family: each member will have his own independent balance and transaction history. Should be pretty convenient for someone to onboard more people to the Lightning party. Just install lnd, bitcoind, lndhub and in your wallet settings put a link to your hub. Share the link with your friends and help them config their wallets. Done!

open Settings and hook BlueWallet with your own lnd/lndhub

This also mitigates effects of hub centralization, letting the user maintain control over his on-chain and off-chain funds.

To sum this up, here’s a quick pros and cons list:

Pros:

Improves user experience, allowing to onboard more users

Completely removes technicalities, like opening and maintaining channels and liquidity (both incoming and outgoing)t

Improves chances of successful payment routing

Receiving payments is a breeze (lndhub and lnd are 100% online, no need for Watchtowers)

Single LndHub (if self-hosted) can help share lightning experience with many users (think friends and family)

Cons:

Funds are held by a 3rd party (but only small amounts for everyday use). Mitigated by opensourcing LndHub.

Minor network centralization

Less private. Hub operator knows who paid whom. Luckily, trust is minimized as Hub doesn’t know who is on sending and who is on receiving end, and what is being paid for. And again, LndHub is opensource for people needing extra privacy.

What next?

You can give it a try with BlueWallet mobile app (iOS and Android), check out code for LndHub or BlueWallet (both are opensource and MIT licensed), and let us know what you think! Of course, there might be bugs, so be careful and please report them. LndHub API spec is also open, so you can build your own product on top of it.

For bonus cypherpunk points you can build wallet binaries yourself and plugnplay your own bitcoind/lnd/lndhub!

Handy links