You know nothing about tennis or about cs. Maybe both. First tennis: " Venus and Serena Williams, aged 17 and 16 respectively, had claimed that they could beat any male player ranked outside the world's top 200, so Braasch, then ranked 203rd, challenged them both. Braasch was described by one journalist as "a man whose training regime centered around a pack of cigarettes and more than a couple bottles of ice cold lager."The matches took place on court number 12 in Melbourne Park, after Braasch had finished a round of golf and two beers. He first took on Serena and after leading 5–0, beat her 6–1. Venus then walked on court and again Braasch was victorious, this time winning 6–2. Braasch said afterwards, "500 and above, no chance." He added that he had played like someone ranked 600th in order to keep the game "fun." Braasch said the big difference was that men can chase down shots much easier, and that men put spin on the ball that the women can't handle. The Williams sisters adjusted their claim to beating men outside the top 350. An 18 year old 4th ranked Serena Williams claimed she could compete with men in professional sport; the US Open champion believing she could take on and beat the best players in the men's game. Nothing ever came to be from this claim." I know they were much younger and bla,bla,bla, but i'm sure that serena still wouldn't be able to beat any male player above 500ATP. Women are just genetically weaker and their physic gives them no chances to compete with men in any sport. Also cs. Men react faster, are smarter and able to communicate better with their teammates. That's all. That's why i think, that these girls are great, cause they beat other opponents, who they can manage to beat. Men level is just unreachable for them. We should respect them, because they also train hard and get very little money for it.

2016-03-26 23:38