Adachi I, Kuwahata H, Fujita K (2007) Dogs recall their owner’s face upon hearing the owner’s voice. Anim Cogn 10(1):17–21

Akaike H (1973) Information theory as an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Csaki F (eds) Second international symposium on information theory. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, pp 267–281

Bates D, Maechler M (2010) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-35

Beerda B, Schilder MBH, van Hooff JARAM, de Vries HW (1997) Manifestations of chronic and acute stress in dogs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 52(3):307–319

Bovet D (1999) Capacités d’abstraction et de catégorisation: etude comparative chez le babouin et l’enfant. Dissertation. University of Aix-marseille, France

Brown SD, Dooling RJ (1992) Perception of conspecific faces by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) I. Natural faces. J Comp Psychol 106:203–216

Bruce C (1982) Face recognition by monkeys: absence of an inversion effect. Neuropsychology 20:515–521

Buswell GT (1935) How people look at pictures: a study of the psychology of perception in art. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

Campan R, Scapini F (2002) Ethologie: approche systémique du comportement. De Boeck Université, Bruxelles

Cerella J (1979) Visual classes and natural categories in the pigeon. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 5(1):68–77

Clutton-Brock J (1996) Origin of the dog: domestication and early history. In: Serpell J (ed) The domestic dog: its evolution, behaviour and interaction with people. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 6–20

Coile DC, Pollitz CH, Smith JC (1989) Behavioral determination of critical flicker fusion in dogs. Physiol Behav 45(6):1087–1092

Coulon M, Deputte BL, Heyman Y, Delatouche L, Richard C, Baudoin C (2007) Visual discrimination by heifers (Bos taurus) of their own species. J Comp Psychol 121(2):198–204

Coulon M, Deputte BL, Heyman Y, Baudoin C (2009) Individual recognition in domestic cattle (Bos taurus): evidence from 2D-images of heads from different breeds. PLoS ONE 4(2):e4441

Coulon M, Baudoin C, Heyman Y, Deputte BL (2010) Cattle discriminate between familiar and unfamiliar conspecifics by using only head visual cues. Anim Cogn 14(2):279–290

Dahl CD, Wallraven C, Bülthoff HH, Logothetis NK (2009) Humans and macaques employ similar face-processing strategies. Curr Biol 19(6):509–513

Denis B (2007) Génétique et sélection chez le chien, vol 2ème édition. PMCAC et SCC, Paris

Dufour V, Pascalis O, Petit O (2006) Face processing limitation to own species in primates: a comparative study in brown capuchins, Tonkean macaques and humans. Behav Process 73:107–113

Eimas PD, Quinn PC, Cowan P (1994) Development of exclusivity in perceptually based categories of young infants. J Exp Child Psychol 58(3):418–431

Faragó T, Pongrácz P, Miklósi Á, Huber L, Virányi Z, Range F (2010) Dogs’ expectation about signalers’ body size by virtue of their growls. PLoS ONE 5(12):e15175

Farah MJ, Wilson KD, Drain M, Tanaka JN (1998) What is “special” about face perception? Psychol Rev 105(3):482–498

Ferreira G, Keller M, Saint-Dizier H, Perrin G, Lévy F (2004) Transfer between views of conspecific faces at different ages or in different orientations by sheep. Behav Process 67:491–499

Fujita K (1987) Species recognition by five macaques monkeys. Primates 28(3):353–366

Fujita K (1993) Development of visual preference for closely related species by infant and juvenile macaques with restricted social experience. Primates 34(2):141–150

Fujita K, Watanabe K (1995) Visual preference for closely related species by Sulawesi macaques. Am J Primatol 37(3):253–261

Gaunet F, Deputte B (2011) Functionally referential and intentional communication in the domestic dog: effects of spatial and social contexts. Anim Cogn 14(6):849–860

Gheusi G, Bluthé R-M, Goodall G, Dantzer R (1994) Social and individual recognition in rodents: methodological aspects and neurobiological bases. Behav Process 33(1–2):59–87

Ghosh N, Lea SEG, Noury M (2004) Transfer to intermediate forms following concept discrimination by pigeons: chimeras and morphs. J Exp Anal Behav 82(2):125–141

Goto K, Lea SEG, Wills AJ, Milton F (2011) Interpreting the effects of image manipulation on picture perception in pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens). J Comp Psychol 125(1):48–60

Hare B, Tomasello M (1999) Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) use human and conspecific social cues to locate hidden food. J Comp Psychol 113:173–177

Harlow HF (1949) The formation of learning sets. Psychol Rev 56:51–65

Hattori Y, Kano F, Tomonaga M (2010) Differential sensitivity to conspecific and allospecific cues in chimpanzees and humans: a comparative eye-tracking study. Biol Lett 6:610–613

Hemmer H (1990) Domestication: the decline of environmental appreciation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Herrnstein RJ (1990) Levels of stimulus control: a functional approach. Cogn 37(1–2):133–166

Jacobs GH, Deegan JF, Crognale MA, Fenwick JA (1993) Photopigments of dogs and foxes and their implications for canid vision. Vis Neurosci 10:173–180

Kanwisher N, Yovel G (2006) The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces. Phil Trans R Soc B 361:2109–2128

Kendrick KM, Atkins K, Hinton MR, Broad KD, Fabre-Nys C, Keverne B (1995) Facial and vocal discrimination in sheep. Anim Behav 49(6):1665–1676

Kendrick KM, Atkins K, Hinton MR, Heavens P, Keverne B (1996) Are faces special for sheep? Evidence from facial and object discrimination learning tests showing effects of inversion and social familiarity. Behav Process 38(1):19–35

Kendrick KM, Hinton MR, Atkins K, Haupt MA, Skinner JD (1998) Mothers determine sexual preferences. Nature 395:229–230

Kendrick KM, Leigh A, Peirce J (2001a) Behavioural and neural correlates of mental imagery in sheep using face recognition paradigms. Anim Welf 10:89–101

Kendrick KM, Haupt MA, Hinton MR, Broad KD, Skinner JD (2001b) Sex differences in the influence of mothers on the sociosexual preferences of their offspring. Hormon Behav 40(2):322–338

Kerswell KJ, Butler KL, Bennett P, Hemsworth PH (2010) The relationships between morphological features and social signalling behaviours in juvenile dogs: the effect of early experience with dogs of different morphotypes. Behav Process 85(1):1–7

Leopold DA, Rhodes G (2010) A comparative view of face perception. J Comp Psychol 124(3):233–251

Ligout S, Porter RH (2004) The role of visual cues in lambs’ discrimination between individual agemates. Behaviour 141(5):617–632

Ligout S, Keller M, Porter RH (2004) The role of olfactory cues in the discrimination of agemates by lambs. Anim Behav 68:785–792

Lombardi CM, Delius JD (1990) Size invariance of pattern recognition in pigeons. Behavioral approaches to pattern recognition and concept formation. In: Commons ML, Herrnstein RJ, Kosslyn SM, Mumford DB (eds) Behavioral approaches to pattern recognition and concept formation. Quantitative analyses of behavior, vol 8. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 41–65

Malpass RS, Kravitz J (1969) Recognition for faces of own and other race. J Personal Soc Psychol 13(4):330–334

Megnin P (1897) Le chien et ses races. Tome I: Histoire du chien depuis les temps les plus reculés, Origine des races et classification. Bibliothèque de l’Eleveur, Vincennes

Meissner CA, Brigham JC (2001) Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Public Policy Law 7(1):3–35

Miklósi A (2007) Dog: behaviour, evolution, and cognition. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Miller PE (2008) Structure and function of the eye. In: Maggs DJ, Miller PE, Ofri R (eds) Slatter’s fundamentals of veterinary opthalmology. Saunders Elsevier, St Louis, Missouri, pp 1–19

Morgan CL (1898) An introduction to comparative psychology. Walter Scott Ltd, London

Nagasawa M, Murai K, Mogi K, Kikusui T (2011) Dogs can discriminate human smiling faces from blank expressions. Anim Cogn 14(4):525–533

Neuhaus W, Regenfuss E (1967) Über die Sehschärfe des Haushundes bei verschiedenen Helligkeiten. Z Vgl Physiol 57(2):137–146

Ogura T (2011) Contrafreeloading and the value of control over visual stimuli in Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata). Anim Cogn 14:427–431

Parr LA, Heintz M (2008) Discrimination of faces and houses by Rhesus monkeys: the role of stimulus expertise and rotation angle. Anim Cogn 11:467–474

Parr LA, Dove T, Hopkins WD (1998) Why faces may be special: evidence of the inversion effect in chimpanzees. J Cogn Neurosci 10:615–622

Pascalis O, Bachevalier J (1998) Face recognition in primates: a cross-species study. Behav Process 43:87–96

Pascalis O, de Haan M, Nelson CA (2002) Is face processing species-specific during the first year of life? Science 296:1321–1323

Peirce JW, Leigh AE, Kendrick KM (2000) Configurational coding, familiarity and the right hemisphere advantage for face recognition in sheep. Neuropsychol 38(4):475–483

Perrett DI, Mistlin AJ (1990) Perception of facial characteristics by monkeys. In: Stebbins WC, Berkley MA (eds) Comparative perception: complex signals, vol 2. Wiley, New York, pp 187–215

Perrett DI, Rolls ET, Caan W (1982) Visual neurones responsive to faces in the monkey temporal cortex. Exp Brain Res 47:329–342

Perrett DI, Mistlin AJ, Chitty A, Smith PAJ, Potter DD, Broennimann R, Harries M (1988) Specialized face processing and hemispheric asymmetry in man and monkey: evidence from single unit and reaction time studies. Behav Process 29:245–258

Pinsk MA, Arcaro M, Weiner KS, Kalkus JF, Inati SJ, Gross CG, Kastner S (2009) Neural representations of faces and body parts in macaque and human cortex: a comparative fMRI study. J Neurophysiol 101(5):2581–2600

Porter RH (1987) Kin recognition: functions and mediating mechanisms. In: Crawford C, Smith M, Krebs D (eds) Sociobiology and psychobiology: ideas, issues and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp 175–203

Porter RH, Nowak R, Orgeur P, Lévy F, Schaal B (1997) Twin/non-twin discrimination by lambs: an investigation of salient stimulus characteristics. Behaviour 134:463–475

Pretterer G, Bubna-Littitz H, Windischbauer G, Gabler C, Griebel U (2004) Brightness discrimination in the dog. J Vis 4:241–249

Quinn PC, Eimas PD (1996) Perceptual cues that permit categorical differentiation of animal species by infants. J Exp Child Psychol 63(1):189–211

R Development Core Team (2010) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria

Racca A, Amadei E, Ligout S, Guo K, Meints K, Mills D (2010) Discrimination of human and dog faces and inversion responses in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris). Anim Cogn 13(3):525–533

Range F, Viranyi Z, Huber L (2007a) Selective imitation in domestic dogs. Curr Biol 17:868–872

Range F, Aust U, Steurer M, Huber L (2007b) Visual categorization of natural stimuli by domestic dogs. Anim Cogn 11(2):339–347

Regodon S, Robina A, Franco A, Vivo JM, Lignereux Y (1991) Détermination radiologique et statistique des types morphologiques Crâniens chez le Chien: dolichocéphalic. Mésocéphalie et Brachycéphalie. Anat Histol Embryol 20(2):129–138

Rybarczyk P, Koba Y, Rushen J, Tanida H, de Passillé AM (2001) Can cows discriminate people by their faces? Appl Anim Behav Sci 74(3):175–189

Schrier AM (1984) Learning how to learn: the significance and current status of learning set formation. Primates 25(1):95–102

Sherman SM, Wilson JR (1975) Behavioral and morphological evidence for binocular competition in the postnatal development of the dog’s visual system. J Comp Neurol 161(2):183–195

Somppi S, Törnqvist H, Hänninen L, Krause C, Vainio O (2012) Dogs do look at images: eye tracking in canine cognition research. Anim Cogn 15(2):163–174

Soto FA, Wasserman EA (2010) Error-driven learning in visual categorization and object recognition: a common-elements model. Psychol Rev 117:349–381

Spence KW (1960) Behavior theory and Learning. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

Sperling SE (1965) Reversal learning and resistance to extinction: a supplementary report. Psychol Bull 64(4):310–312

Svartberg K, Forkman B (2002) Personality traits in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). Appl Anim Behav Sci 79(2):133–155

Sweller J (1973) The effect of task difficulty and criteria of learning on a subsequent reversal. Q J Exp Psychol 25(2):223–228

Tate AJ, Fischer H, Leigh AE, Kendrick KM (2006) Behavioural and neurophysiological evidence for face identity and face emotion processing in animals. Phil Trans R Soc B 361:2155–2172

Tibbetts EA (2002) Visual signals of individual identity in the wasp Polistes fuscatus. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:1423–1428

Tinbergen N (1953) Social behaviour in animals with special references to vertebrates. Methuen & Co. Ltd, London

Tsao DY, Freiwald WA, Tootell RBH, Livingstone MS (2006) A cortical region consisting entirely of face-selective cells. Science 311:670–674

Van der Velden J, Zheng Y, Patullo BW, Macmillan DL (2008) Crayfish recognize the faces of fight opponents. PLoS ONE 3(2):e1695

Vaughan W (1988) Formation of equivalence sets in pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 14(1):36–42

Virányi Z, Topál J, Gácsi M, Miklósi Á, Csányi V (2004) Dogs respond appropriately to cues of humans’ attentional focus. Behav Process 66(2):161–172

Virányi Z, Gácsi M, Kubinyi E, Topál J, Belényi B, Ujfalussy D, Miklósi Á (2008) Comprehension of human pointing gestures in young human-reared wolves (Canis lupus) and dogs (Canis familiaris). Anim Cogn 11(3):373–387

Wayne RK, Ostrander EA (2007) Lessons learned from the dog genome. Trends Genet 23(11):557–567

Yin RK (1969) Looking at upside-down faces. J Exp Psychol 81(1):141–145

Yoshikubo S (1985) Species discrimination and concept formation by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Primates 26:285–299