COLUMBIA, S. C. — Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders are highlighting their contrasting styles and character as election season rolls on.

While the Democratic presidential candidates continue toward the South Carolina primary Saturday and looming March contests, their different pitches are on full display. Clinton touts her regional expertise and personal ties on the ground, while Sanders focuses on his message of tackling income inequality and political oligarchy.

Undecided voters must determine which candidate would best represent their interests moving forward.

The stylistic choices by the former secretary of state and Vermont senator highlight key tensions in the race. She shows strength in endorsements and party support, much of which Sanders lacks. But he has the ability to connect with voters through a big inspirational message, something Clinton has struggled to do.

The Democratic contenders agree on some fundamental goals for the country, but have much different views regarding how to achieve them. For example, both seek to answer to the anger many Americans are feeling towards Wall Street and the nation’s largest banks through reforms. However, there is a clear divide in the ways they would accomplish this.

Clinton wants to manage financial institutions by pushing Congress to pass legislation that would regulate “high-risk” behavior. She wants to close loopholes in an already existing post-bailout law originally meant to prohibit banks from shaky trading bets with taxpayer-backed money; the loophole allows hedge funds to be used in these bets.

Sanders believes the best way to manage the largest financial institutions and prevent a future crisis is to break them up into smaller companies, instead of attempting to control them through additional regulations. He is a proponent of reinstating Glass-Steagall provisions, which originally prevented banks from “gambling” with their customers’ money. The repeal of those laws in the late 90s is a key reason the economy took a nosedive over the last decade.

Clinton would face an uphill battle, with Congress at a near-stalemate on a number of issues, especially corporate finance and how to handle the “big banks.” Sanders too, would face a difficult fallout from the financial and banking industries he’s challenging. How well they will handle backlash from opponents as president is undoubtedly a major selling point for voters, as well as strength in convictions to keep promises and avoid changing views in the face of pressure.