The day after the Grand Jury of Middlesex met at Westminster, the Grand Jury of Kent met at Deptford in front of Sir John Baldwin (Chief Justice of the Common Pleas), Sir Walter Luke and five other Justices. Their task was to rule on the alleged crimes of Queen Anne Boleyn, Sir Henry Norris, Sir William Brereton, Sir Francis Weston, George Boleyn (Lord Rochford) and Mark Smeaton committed in Kent, at Greenwich Palace, East Greenwich and Eltham Palace.

The Baga de Secretis, as transcribed in the Appendix of Wriothesley’s Chronicle, lists the Grand Jury panel members. The dots show those who appeared and the word “jur.” appears after the names of those who were sworn in.1

. Ricardus Clement, miles, jur.

. Willelmus Fynche, miles, jur.

. Edwardus Boughton, miles, jur.

. Antonius Seyntleger, armiger, jur.

. Johannes Cromer, armiger, jur.

. Johannes Fogg, arrniger jur.

. Thomas Willesford armiger, jur.

. Johannes Norton, armiger, jur.

. Humfridus Style, armiger, jur.

. Robertus Fysher, gent. jur.

. Thomas Sybbell, gent. jur.

. Johannes Lovelas, gent. jur.

. Walterus Harynden, gent. jur.

. Edwardus Page, gent. jur.

. Thomas Fereby, gent. jur.

. Lionellus Ansty, gent. jur.

Willelmus Buston, gent.

Stephanus Astyn, gent.

Thomas Grene, gent.

Thomas Chapman, gent.

Willelmus Iden, gent.

Marcus Aucher, gent.

Robertus Brograve, gent.

Willelmus Swan, gent.

Thomas Swan, gent.

Here is a transcript of the Kent Indictment:

“Record of indictment and process before Baldewyn, Luke, and others, in co. Kent.

The indictment found at Deptford, on Thursday, 11 May 28 Hen. VIII., is precisely similar in character to the Middlesex indictment, except as regards times and places; viz., that the Queen at Estgrenewyche [East Greenwich], 12 Nov. 25 Hen. VIII., and divers days before and since, allured one Hen. Noreys, late of Est Grenewyche, to violate her, whereby he did so on the 19 Nov., &c.; that on 22 Dec. 27 Hen. VIII., and divers other days, at Eltham, she allured Geo. Boleyn, lord Rocheford, &c., whereby he did so, 29 Dec., &c.; that on the 16 Nov. 25 Hen. VIII., and divers, &c., at Est Grenewyche, she allured one Will. Bryerton, late of Est Grenewyche, &c., whereby he did so, 27 Nov., &c.; that on the 6 June 26 Hen. VIII., &c., at Est Grenewyche, she allured Sir Fras. Weston, &c., whereby he did so, 20 June, &c.; that on the 13 May 26 Hen. VIII. &c., at Est Grenewyche, she allured Mark Smeton, &c., whereby he did so, 19 May 26 Hen. VIII.

And further that the said Boleyn, &c. grew jealous of each other; and the Queen, to encourage them, at Eltham, 31 Dec. 27 Hen. VIII., and divers times before and since, made them presents, &c.; that the Queen and the others, 8 Jan. 27 Hen. VIII., conspired the King’s death, &c., and that she promised to marry one of the traitors whenever the King was dead, affirming she would never love him, &c.”2

As the editor of the Baga de Secretis points out (and as is pointed out in the record of the indictment in Letters and Papers), the indictment is “nearly identical in wording with the like precept to the Sheriff of Middlesex” so it is little wonder that the Grand Jury of Kent also decided that there was sufficient evidence for Anne and the men to be tried for their crimes.

As I mentioned in The Fall of Anne Boleyn: A Countdown, if we combine the Kent and Middlesex Indictments we get a clearer picture of the dates of the alleged offences:

6th and 12th October 1533 – Anne “procured” Sir Henry Norris “to violate her” at Westminster.

12th November and 19th November 1533 – Anne “allured” Sir Henry Norris “to violate her” at Greenwich.

16th and 27th November 1533 – Anne and Sir William Brereton at Greenwich.

3rd and 8th December 1533 – Anne “procured” Sir William Brereton “to violate her” at Hampton Court.

12th April 1534 – Anne “procured” Mark Smeaton at Westminster (date for Anne procuring Smeaton).

8th and 20th May 1534 – Anne “procured” Sir Francis Weston at Westminster.

6th and 20th June 1534 – Anne “allured” and then slept with Sir Francis Weston at Greenwich.

26th April 1535 – Mark Smeaton “violated” Anne at Westminster.

13th and 19th May 1535 – Anne “allured” and then slept with Mark Smeaton at Greenwich.

31st October 1535 – Anne and some of the men plotted the King’s death at Westminster.

2nd and 5th November 1535 – Anne “procured” her brother George Boleyn,Lord Rochford, “to violate her” at Westminster.

27th November 1535 – Anne gave gifts to the men at Westminster.

22nd and 29th December 1535 – Anne “allured” and then slept with her brother George Boleyn, Lord Rochford, at Eltham Palace.

8th January 1536 – Anne plotted the King’s death with Rochford, Norris, Weston and Brereton at Greenwich.

As historian Eric Ives3 pointed out in his book, The Life and Death of Anne Boleyn, these dates actually do not make sense. Three quarters of the alleged offences can be disproven because either Anne Boleyn or the man she was alleged to have slept with were actually not at the place cited in the indictments. I find it interesting that the final weekend of April 1536 is not mentioned in the indictments, yet we know that Anne reprimanded Smeaton for mooning over her and had the fateful “dead men’s shoes” argument with Sir Henry Norris. Does this suggest that the indictments were drawn up before those events? It’s impossible to know.

The Grand Juries obviously believed that Anne Boleyn had the time, energy and means to sleep with five men. How odd that nobody noticed before April 1536!

Notes and Sources

Wriothesley, Charles. A Chronicle of England During the Reigns of the Tudors, from A.D. 1485 to 1559, 206, Appendix, Baga de Secretis Pouch VIII LP x. 876 Ives, Eric. The Life and Death of Anne Boleyn, 344

Categories: Anne Boleyn Fall, Events of 1536, George Boleyn

