whatever the plan is, those leaks are damaging it. since people who'll watch the presentation also are paying attention to that. And at the end of the day does it matter since none of those even said something interesting. at least to me, I just can't care at all about the setting of yet another shooter

anyway, I fully expect the 3d mario to be just as great as all the previous mario. I'm not thinking at all it should solve the question about making a fully designed world more interesting and yet not sequential. Zelda and mario exchanging place would

be way better.

Other than that though, it's bad. since thanks to the leak we only have the name, it doesn't sound appealing. I'll be more than happy to bite again on those two online games (mk splatoon) but yeah like nothing new ?

and who cares about "reboot" as if they could reboot a game existing solely for you know gameplay reason. So no new games ?

in fact those leaks are the single worst way to present those information.

and as for 3rd parties, yeah it won't work. No there isn't going to be a reason to not take the online fees money (or comarketing bs) and in fact not putting the game on a nintendo platform is weirdly a way to prove the technical achievements of a game.

Not that I care that much since those games are just awful, and now due to the leak , I'm incline to think that once again nintendo let the launch window to the 3rd parties (3ds) and they just mess it up !

It's plausible to me, that zelda is delayed because oh look at that skyrim. And this is pretty bad

objectively the new mario, new zelda, a very needed sequel to splatoon , a mk8 (costly) dlc and pikmin, would a be a great ds wii 3ds wii u year, but thanks to this leak. It's the worst way to show it