1. Okazaki, T. & Honjo, T. PD-1 and PD-1 ligands: from discovery to clinical application. Int. Immunol. 19, 813–824 (2007).

2. Pagès, F. et al. International validation of the consensus immunoscore for the classification of colon cancer: a prognostic and accuracy study. Lancet 391, 2128–2139 (2018).

3. June, C. H., O’Connor, R. S., Kawalekar, O. U., Ghassemi, S. & Milone, M. C. CAR T cell immunotherapy for human cancer. Science 359, 1361–1365 (2018).

4. Chen, D. S. & Mellman, I. Oncology meets immunology: the cancer-immunity cycle. Immunity 39, 1–10 (2013).A definition of the cancer–immunity cycle.

5. Chen, D. S. & Mellman, I. Elements of cancer immunity and the cancer–immune set point. Nature 541, 321–330 (2017).

6. Mellman, I., Coukos, G. & Dranoff, G. Cancer immunotherapy comes of age. Nature 480, 480–489 (2011).

7. Medzhitov, R. & Janeway, C. A. Jr. Innate immune induction of the adaptive immune response. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 64, 429–435 (1999).

8. Vivier, E. et al. Innate lymphoid cells: 10 years on. Cell 174, 1054–1066 (2018).

9. Pradeu, T., Jaeger, S. & Vivier, E. The speed of change: towards a discontinuity theory of immunity? Nat. Rev. Immunol. 13, 764–769 (2013).

10. Broz, M. L. et al. Dissecting the tumor myeloid compartment reveals rare activating antigen-presenting cells critical for T cell immunity. Cancer Cell 26, 638–652 (2014).

11. Hildner, K. et al. Batf3 deficiency reveals a critical role for CD8α+ dendritic cells in cytotoxic T cell immunity. Science 322, 1097–1100 (2008).A demonstration of the role of cDC1 in cancer.

12. Poulin, L. F. et al. Characterization of human DNGR-1+ BDCA3+ leukocytes as putative equivalents of mouse CD8α+ dendritic cells. J. Exp. Med. 207, 1261–1271 (2010).

13. Crozat, K. et al. The XC chemokine receptor 1 is a conserved selective marker of mammalian cells homologous to mouse CD8α+ dendritic cells. J. Exp. Med. 207, 1283–1292 (2010).

14. Sancho, D. et al. Tumor therapy in mice via antigen targeting to a novel, DC-restricted C-type lectin. J. Clin. Invest. 118, 2098–2110 (2008).

15. Fuertes, M. B. et al. Host type I IFN signals are required for antitumor CD8+ T cell responses through CD8α+ dendritic cells. J. Exp. Med. 208, 2005–2016 (2011).

16. Spranger, S., Dai, D., Horton, B. & Gajewski, T. F. Tumor-residing Batf3 dendritic cells are required for effector T cell trafficking and adoptive T cell therapy. Cancer Cell 31, 711–723 (2017).

17. Barry, K. C. et al. A natural killer-dendritic cell axis defines checkpoint therapy-responsive tumor microenvironments. Nat. Med. 24, 1178–1191 (2018).

18. Schumacher, T. N. & Schreiber, R. D. Neoantigens in cancer immunotherapy. Science 348, 69–74 (2015).

19. Raulet, D. H. & Guerra, N. Oncogenic stress sensed by the immune system: role of natural killer cell receptors. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 9, 568–580 (2009).

20. Vivier, E. et al. Innate or adaptive immunity? The example of natural killer cells. Science 331, 44–49 (2011).

21. Bottcher, J. P. et al. NK cells stimulate recruitment of cDC1 into the tumor microenvironment promoting cancer immune control. Cell 172, 1022–1037 (2018).

22. Buck, M. D., Sowell, R. T., Kaech, S. M. & Pearce, E. L. Metabolic instruction of immunity. Cell 169, 570–586 (2017).

23. Marabelle, A., Tselikas, L., de Baere, T. & Houot, R. Intratumoral immunotherapy: using the tumor as the remedy. Ann. Oncol. 28 (suppl. 12), xii33–xii43 (2017).

24. Houot, R. & Levy, R. T-cell modulation combined with intratumoral CpG cures lymphoma in a mouse model without the need for chemotherapy. Blood 113, 3546–3552 (2009).

25. Marabelle, A. et al. Depleting tumor-specific Tregs at a single site eradicates disseminated tumors. J. Clin. Invest. 123, 2447–2463 (2013).

26. Sagiv-Barfi, I. et al. Eradication of spontaneous malignancy by local immunotherapy. Sci. Transl. Med. 10, eaan4488 (2018).

27. Ribas, A. et al. SD-101 in combination with pembrolizumab in advanced melanoma: results of a phase Ib, multicenter study. Cancer Discov. 8, 1250–1257 (2018).A clinical trial showing the efficacy of intratumoral TLR9 agonist injections in patients with cancer.

28. Milhem, M. et al. Phase 1b/2, open label, multicenter, study of the combination of SD-101 and pembrolizumab in patients with advanced melanoma who are naïve to anti-PD-1 therapy. J. Clin. Oncol. 37, 9534 (2019).

29. Demaria, O. et al. STING activation of tumor endothelial cells initiates spontaneous and therapeutic antitumor immunity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 15408–15413 (2015).

30. Corrales, L. et al. Direct activation of STING in the tumor microenvironment leads to potent and systemic tumor regression and immunity. Cell Rep. 11, 1018–1030 (2015).

31. Sivick, K. E. et al. Magnitude of therapeutic STING activation determines CD8+ T cell-mediated anti-tumor immunity. Cell Rep. 25, 3074–3085 (2018).

32. Harrington, K. et al. Preliminary results of the first-in-human (FIH) study of MK-1454, an agonist of stimulator of interferon genes (STING), as monotherapy or in combination with pembrolizumab (pembro) in patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphomas. Ann. Oncol. 29, mdy424.015 (2018).

33. Middleton, M. et al. Phase I/II, multicenter, open-label study of intratumoral/intralesional administration of the retinoic acid–inducible gene I (RIG-I) activator MK-4621 in patients with advanced or recurrent tumors. Ann. Oncol. 29, mdy424.016 (2018).

34. McPherson, A. et al. Divergent modes of clonal spread and intraperitoneal mixing in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Nat. Genet. 48, 758–767 (2016).

35. Jimenez-Sanchez, A. et al. Heterogeneous tumor-immune microenvironments among differentially growing metastases in an ovarian cancer patient. Cell 170, 927–938 (2017).

36. Galluzzi, L., Buqué, A., Kepp, O., Zitvogel, L. & Kroemer, G. Immunogenic cell death in cancer and infectious disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 17, 97–111 (2017).

37. Rios-Doria, J. et al. Doxil synergizes with cancer immunotherapies to enhance antitumor responses in syngeneic mouse models. Neoplasia 17, 661–670 (2015).

38. Abruzzese, M. P. et al. Inhibition of bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) proteins increases NKG2D ligand MICA expression and sensitivity to NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity in multiple myeloma cells: role of cMYC-IRF4-miR-125b interplay. J. Hematol. Oncol. 9, 134 (2016).

39. Cao, G. et al. Tumor therapeutics work as stress inducers to enhance tumor sensitivity to natural killer (NK) cell cytolysis by up-regulating NKp30 ligand B7-H6. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 29964–29973 (2015).

40. Ruscetti, M. et al. NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity contributes to tumor control by a cytostatic drug combination. Science 362, 1416–1422 (2018).

41. Garg, A. D. et al. Trial watch: immunogenic cell death induction by anticancer chemotherapeutics. OncoImmunology 6, e1386829 (2017).

42. Schmid, P. et al. Atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in advanced triple-negative breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 379, 2108–2121 (2018).

43. Apetoh, L. et al. Toll-like receptor 4-dependent contribution of the immune system to anticancer chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Nat. Med. 13, 1050–1059 (2007).

44. Obeid, M. et al. Calreticulin exposure is required for the immunogenicity of gamma-irradiation and UVC light-induced apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 14, 1848–1850 (2007).

45. Deng, L. et al. STING-dependent cytosolic DNA sensing promotes radiation-induced type I interferon-dependent antitumor immunity in immunogenic tumors. Immunity 41, 843–852 (2014).

46. Fiorica, F. et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab and radiotherapy in pretreated lung cancer patients: efficacy and safety of combination. Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 41, 1101–1105 (2018).

47. Luke, J. J. et al. Safety and clinical activity of pembrolizumab and multisite stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors. J. Clin. Oncol. 36, 1611–1618 (2018).

48. Vanpouille-Box, C. et al. DNA exonuclease Trex1 regulates radiotherapy-induced tumour immunogenicity. Nat. Commun. 8, 15618 (2017).

49. Salmon, H. et al. Expansion and activation of CD103+ dendritic cell progenitors at the tumor site enhances tumor responses to therapeutic PD-L1 and BRAF inhibition. Immunity 44, 924–938 (2016).

50. Hammerich, L. et al. Systemic clinical tumor regressions and potentiation of PD1 blockade with in situ vaccination. Nat. Med. 25, 814–824 (2019).

51. Dranoff, G. et al. Vaccination with irradiated tumor cells engineered to secrete murine granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor stimulates potent, specific, and long-lasting anti-tumor immunity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 3539–3543 (1993).

52. Mach, N. et al. Differences in dendritic cells stimulated in vivo by tumors engineered to secrete granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor or Flt3-ligand. Cancer Res. 60, 3239–3246 (2000).

53. Nasi, M. L. et al. Intradermal injection of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in patients with metastatic melanoma recruits dendritic cells. Cytokines Cell. Mol. Ther. 5, 139–144 (1999).

54. Andtbacka, R. H. et al. Talimogene laherparepvec improves durable response rate in patients with advanced melanoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 33, 2780–2788 (2015).

55. Chesney, J. et al. Randomized, open-label phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of talimogene laherparepvec in combination with ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone in patients with advanced, unresectable melanoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 36, 1658–1667 (2018).

56. Ribas, A. et al. Oncolytic virotherapy promotes intratumoral T cell infiltration and improves anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. Cell 174, 1031–1032 (2018).

57. Zitvogel, L., Galluzzi, L., Kepp, O., Smyth, M. J. & Kroemer, G. Type I interferons in anticancer immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 15, 405–414 (2015).

58. Diamond, M. S. et al. Type I interferon is selectively required by dendritic cells for immune rejection of tumors. J. Exp. Med. 208, 1989–2003 (2011).

59. Dunn, G. P. et al. A critical function for type I interferons in cancer immunoediting. Nat. Immunol. 6, 722–729 (2005).A study describing the role of type I IFNs in cancer.

60. Le Mercier, I. et al. Tumor promotion by intratumoral plasmacytoid dendritic cells is reversed by TLR7 ligand treatment. Cancer Res. 73, 4629–4640 (2013).

61. Wang, S. et al. Intratumoral injection of a CpG oligonucleotide reverts resistance to PD-1 blockade by expanding multifunctional CD8+ T cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E7240–E7249 (2016).

62. Wennerberg, E., Kremer, V., Childs, R. & Lundqvist, A. CXCL10-induced migration of adoptively transferred human natural killer cells toward solid tumors causes regression of tumor growth in vivo. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 64, 225–235 (2015).

63. Swann, J. B. et al. Type I IFN contributes to NK cell homeostasis, activation, and antitumor function. J. Immunol. 178, 7540–7549 (2007).

64. Huang, T. H., Chintalacharuvu, K. R. & Morrison, S. L. Targeting IFN-α to B cell lymphoma by a tumor-specific antibody elicits potent antitumor activities. J. Immunol. 179, 6881–6888 (2007).

65. Rossi, E. A. et al. Preclinical studies on targeted delivery of multiple IFNα2b to HLA-DR in diverse hematologic cancers. Blood 118, 1877–1884 (2011).

66. Yang, X. et al. Targeting the tumor microenvironment with interferon-β bridges innate and adaptive immune responses. Cancer Cell 25, 37–48 (2014).

67. Cauwels, A. et al. Delivering type I interferon to dendritic cells empowers tumor eradication and immune combination treatments. Cancer Res. 78, 463–474 (2018).

68. Monticelli, L. A. et al. Innate lymphoid cells promote lung-tissue homeostasis after infection with influenza virus. Nat. Immunol. 12, 1045–1054 (2011).

69. Van Gool, F. et al. Interleukin-5-producing group 2 innate lymphoid cells control eosinophilia induced by interleukin-2 therapy. Blood 124, 3572–3576 (2014).

70. Berntsen, A., Brimnes, M. K., thor Straten, P. & Svane, I. M. Increase of circulating CD4+CD25highFoxp3+ regulatory T cells in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma during treatment with dendritic cell vaccination and low-dose interleukin-2. J. Immunother. 33, 425–434 (2010).

71. Sim, G. C. et al. IL-2 therapy promotes suppressive ICOS+ T reg expansion in melanoma patients. J. Clin. Invest. 124, 99–110 (2014).

72. Hurwitz, M. et al. Baseline tumor-immune signatures associated with response to bempegaldesleukin (NKTR-214) and nivolumab. J. Clin. Oncol. 37, 2623 (2019).

73. Tannir, N. et al. A phase III randomized open label study comparing bempegaldesleukin (NKTR-214) plus nivolumab to sunitinib or cabozantinib (investigator’s choice) in patients with previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 37, TPS4595 (2019).

74. Khushalani, N. et al. CA045–001: A phase III, randomized, open label study of bempegaldesleukin (NKTR-214) plus nivolumab (NIVO) versus NIVO monotherapy in patients (pts) with previously untreated, unresectable or metastatic melanoma (MEL). J. Clin. Oncol. 37, TPS9601 (2019).

75. Huntington, N. D. et al. IL-15 trans-presentation promotes human NK cell development and differentiation in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 206, 25–34 (2009).

76. Uchida, J. et al. The innate mononuclear phagocyte network depletes B lymphocytes through Fc receptor-dependent mechanisms during anti-CD20 antibody immunotherapy. J. Exp. Med. 199, 1659–1669 (2004).

77. Gerdes, C. A. et al. GA201 (RG7160): a novel, humanized, glycoengineered anti-EGFR antibody with enhanced ADCC and superior in vivo efficacy compared with cetuximab. Clin. Cancer Res. 19, 1126–1138 (2013).

78. Paz-Ares, L. G. et al. Phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic dose-escalation study of RG7160 (GA201), the first glycoengineered monoclonal antibody against the epidermal growth factor receptor, in patients with advanced solid tumors. J. Clin. Oncol. 29, 3783–3790 (2011).

79. Herter, S. et al. Preclinical activity of the type II CD20 antibody GA101 (obinutuzumab) compared with rituximab and ofatumumab in vitro and in xenograft models. Mol. Cancer Ther. 12, 2031–2042 (2013).

80. Stockert, E. et al. A survey of the humoral immune response of cancer patients to a panel of human tumor antigens. J. Exp. Med. 187, 1349–1354 (1998).

81. Reuschenbach, M., von Knebel Doeberitz, M. & Wentzensen, N. A systematic review of humoral immune responses against tumor antigens. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 58, 1535–1544 (2009).

82. Murphy, M. A., O’Leary, J. J. & Cahill, D. J. Assessment of the humoral immune response to cancer. J. Proteomics 75, 4573–4579 (2012).

83. Daëron, M., Malbec, O., Latour, S., Arock, M. & Fridman, W. H. Regulation of high-affinity IgE receptor-mediated mast cell activation by murine low-affinity IgG receptors. J. Clin. Invest. 95, 577–585 (1995).

84. Schreiber, H., Wu, T. H., Nachman, J. & Rowley, D. A. Immunological enhancement of primary tumor development and its prevention. Semin. Cancer Biol. 10, 351–357 (2000).

85. Clynes, R. A., Towers, T. L., Presta, L. G. & Ravetch, J. V. Inhibitory Fc receptors modulate in vivo cytotoxicity against tumor targets. Nat. Med. 6, 443–446 (2000).A description of the role of FcRγ in antitumour responses.

86. Roghanian, A. et al. Antagonistic human FcγRIIB (CD32B) antibodies have anti-tumor activity and overcome resistance to antibody therapy in vivo. Cancer Cell 27, 473–488 (2015).

87. Andre, P. et al. Anti-NKG2A mAb is a checkpoint inhibitor that promotes anti-tumor immunity by unleashing both T and NK cells. Cell 175, 1731–1743 (2018).The definition of monalizumab as a broad-spectrum immune checkpoint inhibitor.

88. van Montfoort, N. et al. NKG2A blockade potentiates CD8 T cell immunity induced by cancer vaccines. Cell 175, 1744–1755 (2018).A description of the role of NKG2A blockade in cancer vaccination.

89. Zhang, Q. et al. Blockade of the checkpoint receptor TIGIT prevents NK cell exhaustion and elicits potent anti-tumor immunity. Nat. Immunol. 19, 723–732 (2018).

90. Joller, N. et al. Cutting edge: TIGIT has T cell-intrinsic inhibitory functions. J. Immunol. 186, 1338–1342 (2011).

91. Johnston, R. J. et al. The immunoreceptor TIGIT regulates antitumor and antiviral CD8+ T cell effector function. Cancer Cell 26, 923–937 (2014).

92. Zhou, X. M. et al. Intrinsic expression of immune checkpoint molecule TIGIT could help tumor growth in vivo by suppressing the function of NK and CD8+ T cells. Front. Immunol. 9, 2821 (2018).

93. Chauvin, J. M. et al. TIGIT and PD-1 impair tumor antigen-specific CD8+ T cells in melanoma patients. J. Clin. Invest. 125, 2046–2058 (2015).

94. Das, M., Zhu, C. & Kuchroo, V. K. Tim-3 and its role in regulating anti-tumor immunity. Immunol. Rev. 276, 97–111 (2017).

95. Chiba, S. et al. Tumor-infiltrating DCs suppress nucleic acid-mediated innate immune responses through interactions between the receptor TIM-3 and the alarmin HMGB1. Nat. Immunol. 13, 832–842 (2012).

96. de Mingo Pulido, A. et al. TIM-3 regulates CD103+ dendritic cell function and response to chemotherapy in breast cancer. Cancer Cell 33, 60–74 (2018).

97. Andrews, L. P., Marciscano, A. E., Drake, C. G. & Vignali, D. A. LAG3 (CD223) as a cancer immunotherapy target. Immunol. Rev. 276, 80–96 (2017).

98. Baixeras, E. et al. Characterization of the lymphocyte activation gene 3-encoded protein. A new ligand for human leukocyte antigen class II antigens. J. Exp. Med. 176, 327–337 (1992).

99. Kouo, T. et al. Galectin-3 shapes antitumor immune responses by suppressing CD8+ T cells via LAG-3 and inhibiting expansion of plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Cancer Immunol. Res. 3, 412–423 (2015).

100. Xu, F. et al. LSECtin expressed on melanoma cells promotes tumor progression by inhibiting antitumor T-cell responses. Cancer Res. 74, 3418–3428 (2014).

101. Wang, J. et al. Fibrinogen-like protein 1 is a major immune inhibitory ligand of LAG-3. Cell 176, 334–347 (2019).

102. Veillette, A. & Chen, J. SIRPα–CD47 immune checkpoint blockade in anticancer therapy. Trends Immunol. 39, 173–184 (2018).

103. Chao, M. P. et al. Anti-CD47 antibody synergizes with rituximab to promote phagocytosis and eradicate non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cell 142, 699–713 (2010).

104. Sikic, B. I. et al. First-in-human, first-in-class phase I trial of the anti-CD47 antibody Hu5F9-G4 in patients with advanced cancers. J. Clin. Oncol. 37, 946–953 (2019).

105. Advani, R. et al. CD47 blockade by Hu5F9-G4 and rituximab in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 379, 1711–1721 (2018).A study of the clinical efficacy of phagocytosis manipulation.

106. Gabrilovich, D. I. & Nagaraj, S. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells as regulators of the immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 9, 162–174 (2009).

107. Ruffell, B. & Coussens, L. M. Macrophages and therapeutic resistance in cancer. Cancer Cell 27, 462–472 (2015).

108. Gabrilovich, D. I. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Cancer Immunol. Res. 5, 3–8 (2017).

109. Mittal, D. et al. Antimetastatic effects of blocking PD-1 and the adenosine A2A receptor. Cancer Res. 74, 3652–3658 (2014).

110. Ohta, A. et al. A2A adenosine receptor protects tumors from antitumor T cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 13132–13137 (2006).

111. Cekic, C., Day, Y. J., Sag, D. & Linden, J. Myeloid expression of adenosine A2A receptor suppresses T and NK cell responses in the solid tumor microenvironment. Cancer Res. 74, 7250–7259 (2014).

112. Wang, L. et al. CD73 has distinct roles in nonhematopoietic and hematopoietic cells to promote tumor growth in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 121, 2371–2382 (2011).

113. Perrot, I. et al. Blocking antibodies targeting the CD39/CD73 immunosuppressive pathway unleash immune responses in combination cancer therapies. Cell Rep. 27, 2411–2425 (2019).

114. Mascanfroni, I. D. et al. IL-27 acts on DCs to suppress the T cell response and autoimmunity by inducing expression of the immunoregulatory molecule CD39. Nat. Immunol. 14, 1054–1063 (2013).

115. Sun, X. et al. CD39/ENTPD1 expression by CD4+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells promotes hepatic metastatic tumor growth in mice. Gastroenterology 139, 1030–1040 (2010).

116. Siu, L. et al. Preliminary phase 1 profile of BMS-986179, an anti-CD73 antibody, in combination with nivolumab in patients with advanced solid tumors. Proc. AACR Annual Meeting 2018 Abstr. CT180 (2018).

117. Overman, M. et al. Safety, efficacy and pharmacodynamics (PD) of MEDI9447 (oleclumab) alone or in combination with durvalumab in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) or pancreatic cancer (panc). J. Clin. Oncol. 36, 4123 (2018).

118. Thomas, D. A. & Massagué, J. TGF-β directly targets cytotoxic T cell functions during tumor evasion of immune surveillance. Cancer Cell 8, 369–380 (2005).

119. Mariathasan, S. et al. TGFβ attenuates tumour response to PD-L1 blockade by contributing to exclusion of T cells. Nature 554, 544–548 (2018).

120. Tauriello, D. V. F. et al. TGFβ drives immune evasion in genetically reconstituted colon cancer metastasis. Nature 554, 538–543 (2018).A demonstration of the role of TGFβ in the exclusion of immune cells at the tumour bed.

121. Ghiringhelli, F. et al. Tumor cells convert immature myeloid dendritic cells into TGF-β-secreting cells inducing CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cell proliferation. J. Exp. Med. 202, 919–929 (2005).

122. Viel, S. et al. TGF-β inhibits the activation and functions of NK cells by repressing the mTOR pathway. Sci. Signal. 9, ra19 (2016).

123. Gao, Y. et al. Tumor immunoevasion by the conversion of effector NK cells into type 1 innate lymphoid cells. Nat. Immunol. 18, 1004–1015 (2017).

124. Novitskiy, S. V. et al. Deletion of TGF-β signaling in myeloid cells enhances their anti-tumorigenic properties. J. Leukoc. Biol. 92, 641–651 (2012).

125. Harizi, H., Juzan, M., Pitard, V., Moreau, J. F. & Gualde, N. Cyclooxygenase-2-issued prostaglandin E 2 enhances the production of endogenous IL-10, which down-regulates dendritic cell functions. J. Immunol. 168, 2255–2263 (2002).

126. Göbel, C. et al. Functional expression cloning identifies COX-2 as a suppressor of antigen-specific cancer immunity. Cell Death Dis. 5, e1568 (2014).

127. Martinet, L., Jean, C., Dietrich, G., Fournié, J. J. & Poupot, R. PGE2 inhibits natural killer and γδ T cell cytotoxicity triggered by NKR and TCR through a cAMP-mediated PKA type I-dependent signaling. Biochem. Pharmacol. 80, 838–845 (2010).

128. Zelenay, S. et al. Cyclooxygenase-dependent tumor growth through evasion of immunity. Cell 162, 1257–1270 (2015).

129. Markiewski, M. M. et al. Modulation of the antitumor immune response by complement. Nat. Immunol. 9, 1225–1235 (2008).

130. Vadrevu, S. K. et al. Complement c5a receptor facilitates cancer metastasis by altering T-cell responses in the metastatic niche. Cancer Res. 74, 3454–3465 (2014).

131. Medler, T. R. et al. Complement C5a fosters squamous carcinogenesis and limits T cell response to chemotherapy. Cancer Cell 34, 561–578 (2018).

132. Ajona, D. et al. A combined PD-1/C5a blockade synergistically protects against lung cancer growth and metastasis. Cancer Discov. 7, 694–703 (2017).

133. Holmgaard, R. B. et al. Timing of CSF-1/CSF-1R signaling blockade is critical to improving responses to CTLA-4 based immunotherapy. OncoImmunology 5, e1151595 (2016).

134. Pyonteck, S. M. et al. CSF-1R inhibition alters macrophage polarization and blocks glioma progression. Nat. Med. 19, 1264–1272 (2013).

135. Ries, C. H. et al. Targeting tumor-associated macrophages with anti-CSF-1R antibody reveals a strategy for cancer therapy. Cancer Cell 25, 846–859 (2014).

136. Peranzoni, E. et al. Macrophages impede CD8 T cells from reaching tumor cells and limit the efficacy of anti-PD-1 treatment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E4041–E4050 (2018).

137. Zhu, Y. et al. CSF1/CSF1R blockade reprograms tumor-infiltrating macrophages and improves response to T-cell checkpoint immunotherapy in pancreatic cancer models. Cancer Res. 74, 5057–5069 (2014).

138. Salvagno, C. et al. Therapeutic targeting of macrophages enhances chemotherapy efficacy by unleashing type I interferon response. Nat. Cell Biol. 21, 511–521 (2019).

139. Cassier, P. A. et al. CSF1R inhibition with emactuzumab in locally advanced diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumours of the soft tissue: a dose-escalation and dose-expansion phase 1 study. Lancet Oncol. 16, 949–956 (2015).

140. Papadopoulos, K. P. et al. First-in-human study of AMG 820, a monoclonal anti-colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 23, 5703–5710 (2017).

141. Autio, K. et al. Phase 1 study of LY3022855, a colony-stimulating factor-1 receptor (CSF-1R) inhibitor, in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) or metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (MCRPC). J. Clin. Oncol. 37, 2548 (2019).

142. Gyori, D. et al. Compensation between CSF1R+ macrophages and Foxp3+ Treg cells drives resistance to tumor immunotherapy. JCI Insight 3, 120631 (2018).

143. Beffinger, M. et al. CSF1R-dependent myeloid cells are required for NK-mediated control of metastasis. JCI Insight 3, 97792 (2018).

144. Mantovani, A., Dinarello, C. A., Molgora, M. & Garlanda, C. Interleukin-1 and related cytokines in the regulation of inflammation and immunity. Immunity 50, 778–795 (2019).

145. Mantovani, A., Barajon, I. & Garlanda, C. IL-1 and IL-1 regulatory pathways in cancer progression and therapy. Immunol. Rev. 281, 57–61 (2018).

146. Guo, B., Fu, S., Zhang, J., Liu, B. & Li, Z. Targeting inflammasome/IL-1 pathways for cancer immunotherapy. Sci. Rep. 6, 36107 (2016).

147. Kuan, E. L. & Ziegler, S. F. A tumor-myeloid cell axis, mediated via the cytokines IL-1α and TSLP, promotes the progression of breast cancer. Nat. Immunol. 19, 366–374 (2018).

148. Ridker, P. M. et al. Effect of interleukin-1β inhibition with canakinumab on incident lung cancer in patients with atherosclerosis: exploratory results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 390, 1833–1842 (2017).

149. Hong, D. S. et al. MABp1, a first-in-class true human antibody targeting interleukin-1α in refractory cancers: an open-label, phase 1 dose-escalation and expansion study. Lancet Oncol. 15, 656–666 (2014).

150. Hickish, T. et al. MABp1 as a novel antibody treatment for advanced colorectal cancer: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 18, 192–201 (2017).

151. Pencheva, N. et al. Convergent multi-miRNA targeting of ApoE drives LRP1/LRP8-dependent melanoma metastasis and angiogenesis. Cell 151, 1068–1082 (2012).

152. Pencheva, N., Buss, C. G., Posada, J., Merghoub, T. & Tavazoie, S. F. Broad-spectrum therapeutic suppression of metastatic melanoma through nuclear hormone receptor activation. Cell 156, 986–1001 (2014).

153. Tavazoie, M. F. et al. LXR/ApoE activation restricts innate immune suppression in cancer. Cell 172, 825–840 (2018).

154. Hollingsworth, R. E. & Jansen, K. Turning the corner on therapeutic cancer vaccines. NPJ Vaccines 4, 7 (2019).

155. Brown, C. E. & Mackall, C. L. CAR T cell therapy: inroads to response and resistance. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 19, 73–74 (2019).

156. Titov, A. et al. The biological basis and clinical symptoms of CAR-T therapy-associated toxicites. Cell Death Dis. 9, 897 (2018).

157. D’Aloia, M. M., Zizzari, I. G., Sacchetti, B., Pierelli, L. & Alimandi, M. CAR-T cells: the long and winding road to solid tumors. Cell Death Dis. 9, 282 (2018).

158. Daher, M. & Rezvani, K. Next generation natural killer cells for cancer immunotherapy: the promise of genetic engineering. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 51, 146–153 (2018).

159. Li, Y., Hermanson, D. L., Moriarity, B. S. & Kaufman, D. S. Human iPSC-derived natural killer cells engineered with chimeric antigen receptors enhance anti-tumor activity. Cell Stem Cell 23, 181–192 (2018).

160. Schmohl, J. U. et al. Tetraspecific scFv construct provides NK cell mediated ADCC and self-sustaining stimuli via insertion of IL-15 as a cross-linker. Oncotarget 7, 73830–73844 (2016).

161. Gauthier, L. et al. Multifunctional natural killer cell engagers targeting NKp46 trigger protective tumor immunity. Cell 177, 1701–1713 (2019).The generation of NKp46 NK cell engagers.

162. Oberg, H. H. et al. Tribody [(HER2) 2 ×CD16] is more effective than trastuzumab in enhancing γδ T cell and natural killer cell cytotoxicity against HER2-expressing cancer cells. Front. Immunol. 9, 814 (2018).

163. Zaretsky, J. M. et al. Mutations associated with acquired resistance to PD-1 blockade in melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 375, 819–829 (2016).

164. Rodrigues, E. & Macauley, M. S. Hypersialylation in cancer: modulation of inflammation and therapeutic opportunities. Cancers (Basel) 10, E207 (2018).

165. Wang, J. et al. Siglec-15 as an immune suppressor and potential target for normalization cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Med. 25, 656–666 (2019).The identification of myeloid checkpoints.

166. Beatson, R. et al. The mucin MUC1 modulates the tumor immunological microenvironment through engagement of the lectin Siglec-9. Nat. Immunol. 17, 1273–1281 (2016).

167. Jandus, C. et al. Interactions between Siglec-7/9 receptors and ligands influence NK cell-dependent tumor immunosurveillance. J. Clin. Invest. 124, 1810–1820 (2014).

168. Stanczak, M. A. et al. Self-associated molecular patterns mediate cancer immune evasion by engaging Siglecs on T cells. J. Clin. Invest. 128, 4912–4923 (2018).

169. Crinier, A. et al. High-dimensional single-cell analysis identifies organ-specific signatures and conserved NK cell subsets in humans and mice. Immunity 49, 971–986 (2018).

170. Godfrey, D. I., Le Nours, J., Andrews, D. M., Uldrich, A. P. & Rossjohn, J. Unconventional T cell targets for cancer immunotherapy. Immunity 48, 453–473 (2018).

171. Saad, E. D., Paoletti, X., Burzykowski, T. & Buyse, M. Precision medicine needs randomized clinical trials. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 14, 317–323 (2017).

172. Marcus, A. et al. Tumor-derived cGAMP triggers a STING-mediated interferon response in non-tumor cells to activate the NK cell response. Immunity 49, 754–763 (2018).

173. Ishikawa, H. & Barber, G. N. STING is an endoplasmic reticulum adaptor that facilitates innate immune signalling. Nature 455, 674–678 (2008).

174. Ishikawa, H., Ma, Z. & Barber, G. N. STING regulates intracellular DNA-mediated, type I interferon-dependent innate immunity. Nature 461, 788–792 (2009).

175. Woo, S. R. et al. STING-dependent cytosolic DNA sensing mediates innate immune recognition of immunogenic tumors. Immunity 41, 830–842 (2014).A study of the role of STING in antitumor immunity.

176. Ho, S. S. et al. The DNA structure-specific endonuclease MUS81 mediates DNA sensor STING-dependent host rejection of prostate cancer cells. Immunity 44, 1177–1189 (2016).

177. Ahn, J., Xia, T., Rabasa Capote, A., Betancourt, D. & Barber, G. N. Extrinsic phagocyte-dependent STING signaling dictates the immunogenicity of dying cells. Cancer Cell 33, 862–873 (2018).

178. Burdette, D. L. et al. STING is a direct innate immune sensor of cyclic di-GMP. Nature 478, 515–518 (2011).

179. Gao, P. et al. Cyclic [G(2′,5′)pA(3′,5′)p] is the metazoan second messenger produced by DNA-activated cyclic GMP-AMP synthase. Cell 153, 1094–1107 (2013).

180. Ablasser, A. et al. cGAS produces a 2′-5′-linked cyclic dinucleotide second messenger that activates STING. Nature 498, 380–384 (2013).

181. Zhang, X. et al. Cyclic GMP-AMP containing mixed phosphodiester linkages is an endogenous high-affinity ligand for STING. Mol. Cell 51, 226–235 (2013).

182. Ablasser, A. et al. Cell intrinsic immunity spreads to bystander cells via the intercellular transfer of cGAMP. Nature 503, 530–534 (2013).

183. Mackenzie, K. J. et al. cGAS surveillance of micronuclei links genome instability to innate immunity. Nature 548, 461–465 (2017).

184. Harding, S. M. et al. Mitotic progression following DNA damage enables pattern recognition within micronuclei. Nature 548, 466–470 (2017).

185. Dou, Z. et al. Cytoplasmic chromatin triggers inflammation in senescence and cancer. Nature 550, 402–406 (2017).

186. Aguilera, A. & Gómez-González, B. Genome instability: a mechanistic view of its causes and consequences. Nat. Rev. Genet. 9, 204–217 (2008).

187. Wu, J. & Chen, Z. J. Innate immune sensing and signaling of cytosolic nucleic acids. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 32, 461–488 (2014).

188. Ishizuka, J. J. et al. Loss of ADAR1 in tumours overcomes resistance to immune checkpoint blockade. Nature 565, 43–48 (2019).

189. Chung, H. et al. Human ADAR1 prevents endogenous RNA from triggering translational shutdown. Cell 172, 811–824 (2018).

190. Liu, H. et al. Tumor-derived IFN triggers chronic pathway agonism and sensitivity to ADAR loss. Nat. Med. 25, 95–102 (2019).

191. Dahan, R. et al. Therapeutic activity of agonistic, human anti-CD40 monoclonal antibodies requires selective FcγR engagement. Cancer Cell 29, 820–831 (2016).

192. Yu, X. et al. Complex interplay between epitope specificity and isotype dictates the biological activity of anti-human CD40 antibodies. Cancer Cell 33, 664–675 (2018).

193. O’Hara, M. et al. CT004—A phase Ib study of CD40 agonistic monoclonal antibody APX005M together with gemcitabine (Gem) and nab-paclitaxel (NP) with or without nivolumab (Nivo) in untreated metastatic ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients. AACR 2019 Abstr. 8060 (2019).

194. Holmgaard, R. B. et al. Tumor-expressed IDO recruits and activates MDSCs in a Treg-dependent manner. Cell Rep. 13, 412–424 (2015).

195. Munn, D. H. & Mellor, A. L. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase and tumor-induced tolerance. J. Clin. Invest. 117, 1147–1154 (2007).

196. Della Chiesa, M. et al. The tryptophan catabolite l-kynurenine inhibits the surface expression of NKp46- and NKG2D-activating receptors and regulates NK-cell function. Blood 108, 4118–4125 (2006).

197. Terness, P. et al. Inhibition of allogeneic T cell proliferation by indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-expressing dendritic cells: mediation of suppression by tryptophan metabolites. J. Exp. Med. 196, 447–457 (2002).

198. Holmgaard, R. B., Zamarin, D., Munn, D. H., Wolchok, J. D. & Allison, J. P. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase is a critical resistance mechanism in antitumor T cell immunotherapy targeting CTLA-4. J. Exp. Med. 210, 1389–1402 (2013).

199. Gibney, G. T. et al. Phase 1/2 study of epacadostat in combination with ipilimumab in patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma. J. Immunother. Cancer 7, 80 (2019).

200. Mitchell, T. C. et al. Epacadostat plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors: phase I results from a multicenter, open-label phase I/II trial (ECHO-202/KEYNOTE-037). J. Clin. Oncol. 36, 3223–3230 (2018).