The new Ghostbusters movie has been praised for putting women into roles once reserved exclusively for men. No longer relegated to secretaries or love interests, these ladies were going to be doing the actual busting. So many male tears were spilled and that was awesome because it’s cool when dudebros are given sadz.

Obviously, though, Lady Ghostbusters is still deeply, incredibly problematic. I mean, AYFKM with this trailer?

“Oh, wow, cool, three white ladies who are into science and inventing stuff” you’re thinking and then you see Leslie Jones and you’re like “YES AN AFRICAN AMERICAN GHOSTBUSTER” and then she’s all “I want to join your club” and you’re like “whoa hold on their club why can’t it be her club too” and then she’s all “you guys are really smart about this science stuff” and you’re like “WHY CAN’T THE BLACK LADY BE SMART ABOUT SCIENCE STUFF” and then you see her working in a subway and you’re like “ffs i cannot even with this.”

Every. Single. Time. One steps forward. Ten steps back.

Fortunately, our fellow warriors for social justice are all over it.

Uh, I think it’s pretty fkin obvious.

UGH THIS. I mean, fans of the Ghostbusters would never settle for a blue collar African American character

would they?

Twitter gave the voiceless a chance to vent their rage:

oh i think we all know why

Hollywood is notably reactionary, though; to studio execs, ghosts are more believable than a black scientist. #smdh

Appropriate handle this one has.

I don’t know why people keep asking this when the answer is so obvious. It’s like asking “Why does she love Cadillacs?”

Remember: SALTY MALE TEARS are worth mocking while SOCIAL JUSTICE TEARS really make you think.

I think we all know why. Because everything’s a problem.

I give the transgression of making a Lady Ghostbusters film in which one of the ladies is black and also not a scientist three problematics.