Anyone who sees my twitter suspension as some kinda win should probably re-evaluate exactly what they’re fighting for.

Or to put it a different way, I wouldn’t celebrate if femfreq was removed from twitter because it is not my intention to silence Feminist Frequency, but rather to prove that the vast majority of what she says is factually incorrect. Her persona and her arguments are completely different things to me (in person, she’s probably very nice, I imagine, but I don’t have a clue), and my entire issue is with her arguments.

My twitter suspension, on the other hand, only has the consequence to completely remove my voice from the conversation on twitter, and now I have to deal with accusations like this that are completely removed from reality:

And the only way I can defend myself from these accusations of “ableism” and “transphobia” is on a completely different site.

Of note, I have never, ever interacted with @ArchivistBecks. This post is the only place I’ve *ever* mentioned him. And in his head, it will be the self-fulfilling prophecy that I might as well be guilty for sending mobs at him, because the only way I can defend myself from his claims is to address his claims. When he initially appeared and there was a ton of drama about him, I stayed out of it because I didn’t see any value in making a stink over a #GamerGate “neutral” traitor.

Post edited: I did not realize Becks identified as male and have corrected this post to reflect that he does. I am not in the business of assuming I have ownership over other people’s identities. I apologize for my initial mistake and must reiterate: I had no idea Becks identified as male as of originally writing this and only realized this as being suspended from twitter has left my twitter account in a read-only state and invalidated all profile bans on my account. In other words, if I could not read your profile on twitter before, I can now.

