In a week where the president of the United States disparaged two critics as “Pocahontas” and “Horseface,” no wonder most of the electorate is fatigued by our political discourse. Now Michael Avenatti enters the fray.

Avenatti is repurposing Michelle Obama Michelle LeVaughn Robinson ObamaBlack stars reimagine 'Friends' to get out the vote Obama shares phone number to find out how Americans are planning to vote Michelle Obama: 'Don't listen to people who will say that somehow voting is rigged' MORE’s “when they go low, we go high” to “when they go low, I say hit back harder.” Last week, he challenged Donald Trump Jr. Don John Trump'Tiger King' star Joe Exotic requests pardon from Trump: 'Be my hero please' Zaid Jilani discusses Trump's move to cancel racial sensitivity training at federal agencies Trump International Hotel in Vancouver closes permanently MORE to a mixed martial arts fight. Yes, Democrats should hit back harder, but with a strategy to win votes rather than headlines. Hitting below the belt may be cathartic for a dispirited base, but I’m more interested in victory than catharsis. It is nearly impossible to beat Donald Trump Donald John TrumpSteele Dossier sub-source was subject of FBI counterintelligence probe Pelosi slams Trump executive order on pre-existing conditions: It 'isn't worth the paper it's signed on' Trump 'no longer angry' at Romney because of Supreme Court stance MORE in a race to the bottom. He will outdo you every time.

ADVERTISEMENT

Democrats stand a strong chance of winning control of the House not because our candidates hit lower, but sharper. Not by calling their opponents names, but by articulating solutions. That is the discourse that wins votes, particularly from nonpartisans who are exhausted by the vitriol. We are talking about the three branches of government established by our Constitution, not a three ring circus.

What is a better strategy? Challenging Trump Jr. to three rounds in the ring or, say, running M.J. Hegar in Texas? She is an Air Force helicopter pilot who received a Purple Heart from her service in Afghanistan. Her leading campaign goals are not to disparage or insult, but rather “fight to make health care more affordable for everyone, support military families, and work hard to protect Medicare and Social Security.”

In blood red Texas, often thought of as out of reach for Democrats, Beto O’Rourke is competitive not because he has come up with a catchy nickname for Senator Ted Cruz Rafael (Ted) Edward CruzThe Hill's Morning Report - Sponsored by Facebook - Trump previews SCOTUS nominee as 'totally brilliant' Cruz blocks amended resolution honoring Ginsburg over language about her dying wish Trump argues full Supreme Court needed to settle potential election disputes MORE (Trump beat him to the punch with his “Lying Ted” two years ago), but because he has traveled the state and inspired such vast levels of support, making national news.

Other candidates across the country are treading similarly constructive paths and running campaigns based on positive contrast, as opposed to name calling. These include Mikie Sherrill in New Jersey, Jason Crow in Colorado, Sharice Davids in Kansas, and many others. Despite what Avenatti may lead you to think, many of them are on track to win.

With a record number of women candidates, and first time candidates from varied backgrounds, Democrats are competing across the map. They are not racing to the bottom, but rather elevating our discourse and running towards a majority. So we should cede the low ground to Trump. Let him wallow in the muck and mud with the third of Americans who are fine with this stain on our democracy. Let Democrats win elections. Avenatti, meanwhile, should focus on winning lawsuits.