Oklahoma’s all-Republican delegation seems to agree. Both U.S. senators and at least three of the five representatives said Tuesday they are against Garland’s nomination going forward.

“The next president should be the one to fill the vacancy on the Supreme Court,” said U.S. Sen. Jim Inhofe.

Nineteen years ago, Inhofe voted to confirm Garland to his current position on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

Garland talked to Inhofe on Wednesday, but was told the senator would not be considering any nominee before the presidential election.

Asked if Inhofe’s opinion of Garland has changed, spokeswoman Donelle Harder said Inhofe would have to review Garland’s record on the bench.

U.S. Sen. James Lankford, who has been adamant about not allowing an Obama nominee to be confirmed, on Wednesday cited instances in which Democrats have opposed judicial confirmations in election years, and he praised the late Justice Antonin Scalia, whose death last month created the current opening.

Lankford’s statement does not mention Garland at all.

Neither did the three representatives from Oklahoma who issued statements Wednesday.