LEGAL AFFAIRS / Government Mind Games / A CIA Mickey -- / Lawsuit claims LSD was put in veteran's drink in 1957

LSD-C-11JUL02-MT-JRS-Portarit of Wayne Richie at his home in San Jose. He is suing the U.S. govt. because he says they put LSD in his drink at a party in 1957. Chronicle Photo by John Storey. LSD-C-11JUL02-MT-JRS-Portarit of Wayne Richie at his home in San Jose. He is suing the U.S. govt. because he says they put LSD in his drink at a party in 1957. Chronicle Photo by John Storey. Photo: John Storey Photo: John Storey Image 1 of / 1 Caption Close LEGAL AFFAIRS / Government Mind Games / A CIA Mickey -- / Lawsuit claims LSD was put in veteran's drink in 1957 1 / 1 Back to Gallery

Until the night of an office Christmas party in 1957, Wayne Ritchie was a Marine Corps veteran, a deputy U.S. marshal and a solid citizen. Overcome by what he later described as depression and a delusion that everyone had turned against him, he tried to hold up a bar that night in San Francisco's Fillmore District.

Spared a prison sentence, Ritchie quit his job in disgrace, spent years fighting off suicidal urges and for more than three decades lived with guilt and self-contempt -- until a 1999 newspaper article propelled him into federal court with a lawsuit against the U.S. government that could soon go to trial.

The article was an obituary of Sidney Gottlieb, director of a CIA mind- control project called MKULTRA, in which LSD and other drugs were given to hundreds of unsuspecting Americans during the Cold War. Ritchie believes he may have been one of the guinea pigs, especially after the diary of a federal agent involved in MKULTRA showed he may have been at the same 1957 Christmas party attended by Ritchie.

Ritchie, now 75 and living in San Jose, "felt that a great weight had been lifted from his shoulders," said psychiatrist James S. Ketchum in a report filed in federal court this April. "He wept when he called his brother with the news."

Ketchum's report, based on six hours of interviews with Ritchie last year, a review of the case records and research on drugs and the CIA, concluded the federal marshal had been a victim of the "covert administration of LSD or an LSD-like substance."

Government lawyers said their own psychiatric expert had determined Ritchie was probably drunk and certainly wasn't on LSD. They accused Ritchie of concocting the drugging theory to cash in on publicity about MKULTRA, the subject of congressional hearings in the 1970s and a 1997 movie, "Conspiracy Theory."

But a new ruling by a federal judge in San Francisco may have removed the major obstacles to a trial of the former marshal's $12 million damage suit. The suit claims invasion of privacy, intentional infliction of emotional distress and negligent supervision of government employees.

MIND CONTROL

MKULTRA, the government's search for chemicals or techniques to control human consciousness, was largely a response to reports of brainwashing of American prisoners during the Korean War.

According to congressional testimony and other records, the CIA and federal narcotics agents started giving mind-altering drugs to prison volunteers as well as unsuspecting government employees and private citizens in the early 1950s and continued to do so for at least a decade.

"We tested these drugs in bars, in restaurants, in so-called massage parlors, any place where there was a drink and people were eating and drinking, " said MKULTRA operative Ike Feldman in a 1999 documentary on the Arts and Entertainment cable network.

Because of the secrecy and destruction of records, many victims were never told what happened to them, said Ritchie's lawyer, Sidney Bender.

One unwitting subject, Army chemist Frank Olson, jumped to his death from a hotel window in 1953 under the influence of LSD that had been slipped into a glass of Cointreau. Congress approved a $750,000 payment to his widow in 1976.

The U.S. government later paid a total of $750,000 to settle a suit by nine Canadians who learned they had been the subjects of MKULTRA experiments during psychiatric treatment in the mid-1950s.

SUIT FAILED AT TRIAL

At least one lawsuit has gone to trial. It ended in a government victory in 1999. The suit was filed by Bender on behalf of the daughter of Stanley Glickman, an American art student who suffered hallucinations and long-lasting psychiatric damage after being given a drink by a fellow American in Paris in 1952.

Before his death in 1992, Glickman said the stranger who gave him the drink resembled the club-footed Gottlieb, but a New York federal jury that examined government travel records decided Gottlieb had not been in Paris at the time.

Ritchie's case may depend on the whereabouts of a man named George White, who in 1957 was a federal Bureau of Narcotics agent and ran MKULTRA in the Bay Area.

White kept a diary that read, for the day in question, "home flu -- xmas party Fed bldg Press Room." White was never asked about the entry before his death in 1975, and its meaning is disputed by the opposing sides. Ritchie argues the entry shows White either attended the party or was in touch with other agents who were there. The government says it shows White stayed home.

Ritchie, then 30, had been a deputy marshal since 1954 after five years in the Marines and a little over a year as a prison guard at Alcatraz. At the party, he downed four or five bourbon and sodas over several hours, then returned to the marshal's office and started feeling strange.

"I became depressed and was overcome with a sense that all my friends and acquaintances had turned against me," he said in a court declaration. He went outside -- where, according to the psychiatrist's report, he seemed to be walking in a tunnel without effort and with increasing feelings of paranoia -- and stopped at several bars, where he conceived the idea of getting money for his girlfriend to buy a plane ticket to New York, something she had once mentioned in jest.

HOLDING UP THE BAR

He retrieved his two service revolvers, drove to the Fillmore bar, demanded money, got distracted and was hit over the head and knocked unconscious. When police arrived, he tearfully asked one officer if he could spare a bullet and save the state some money.

A Chronicle story two days later was headlined, "Good Guy Fails as Bad Guy. " Ritchie pleaded guilty to attempted robbery and was fined $500 and given a suspended sentence.

"He remained severely depressed for at least six years, and experienced disturbing flashbacks and nightmares," said Ketchum's psychiatric report. "His self-esteem was destroyed, and his lifestyle changed from that of an outgoing, cheerful and ambitious marshal to that of a guilt-ridden, self-depriving, subdued house painter, with recurrent suicidal urges."

Ritchie painted houses for 34 years before retiring in 1992, and now lives with his wife on his union pension and Social Security. He said his lawyer has told him not to discuss the case.

In her ruling rejecting the government's attempt to dismiss the suit, Chief U.S. District Judge Marilyn Hall Patel said the usual deadline for such personal-injury claims -- two years after the injury occurred -- might not apply to Ritchie's suit more than 40 years after the Christmas party. She said the evidence could show that, because of government concealment, Ritchie had no reason to know what had happened to him before reading the 1999 obituary.

"A reasonable person who had never used LSD would not think he had been exposed to it," the judge said in her July 1 decision. She noted that Ritchie denied previous knowledge of MKULTRA and that the government destroyed records of the program in the 1970s.

JOB DESCRIPTION

The government also sought dismissal on the grounds that the alleged injury occurred while Ritchie was on duty at the Christmas party and was covered, at most, by workers' compensation benefits, which Ritchie never sought. But Patel said the normal risks of a marshal's job do not include involuntary drugging by the CIA.

Patel did not discuss whether the evidence presented so far supported Ritchie's LSD claim. In a case that concerns decades-old events with scanty records and few living witnesses, that question might not be resolved even by a trial -- which, under the federal law on damage suits against the government,

would be conducted by Patel without a jury.

The Justice Department is making a final attempt to dismiss the suit without a trial by arguing that Ritchie has presented no evidence, beyond speculation, that federal agents caused his injuries. The motion is pending before Patel.

The government denies that Ritchie was an MKULTRA subject and says the likely explanation is the one he himself believed for more than 40 years -- that he was drunk. They cite his admission that he often had 12 to 25 drinks on weekend nights at the time and that he had been drinking before the robbery attempt.

Psychiatrist Henry D. Abraham, in a declaration filed by the government, said Ritchie's actions that evening showed few of the known symptoms of LSD use and included "a complicated set of planned behaviors" that would be difficult after taking the drug.

But Ketchum countered that Ritchie had never reacted that way to alcohol before and showed clear signs of LSD intoxication -- a debate that may soon be replayed in court.