I’ve met many landlords who are convinced that an applicant cannot be rejected based on a conviction as a sex offender.

When the subject comes up in conversation, they typically claim that their lawyer/brother/buddy said, “It’s against the fair housing laws.”

However, they’re never able to cite the statute or law that supports their claim.

This article is intended to explore the facts, examining the housing laws pertaining to sex offenders at a federal, state and local level.

With that said, this is not intended to be exhaustive or a substitute for qualified legal advice.

Federal Government

The Fair Housing Act

The Civil Rights Act (Fair Housing Act) of 1968, Sec. 804. [42 U.S.C. 3604], and all subsequent amendments, do not identify sex offenders as a protected class.

At a federal level, the only protected classes are:

Race

Color

Religion

Sex

Familial Status, including having children or being pregnant

National Origin, or

Mental or Physical Disability

Housing and Urban Development (HUD)

In the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (e-CFR), specifically 24 CFR 5.856, it mandates that sex offenders are prohibited from living in “federally assisted housing” (as defined in 24 CFR 5.100).

§5.856 When must I prohibit admission of sex offenders? You must establish standards that prohibit admission to federally assisted housing if any member of the household is subject to a lifetime registration requirement under a state sex offender registration program. In the screening of applicants, you must perform necessary criminal history background checks in the state where the housing is located and in other states where the household members are known to have resided. (See §5.905.)

Though federally assisted housing is only a small percentage of the total housing in the United States, it sends a strong message when the federal government takes such a strong stance.

After all, convicted sex offenders pay taxes just like everyone else.

Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA)

In 2006, the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act was signed into law by President George W. Bush.

The significance of the law is that it organizes sex offenders into three tiers and mandates specific requirements for each:

Tier 1 offenders: Must update their whereabouts every year with 15 years of registration

Must update their whereabouts every year with 15 years of registration Tier 2 offenders: Must update their whereabouts every six months with 25 years of registration

Must update their whereabouts every six months with 25 years of registration Tier 3 offenders: Must update their whereabouts every three months with lifetime registration requirements.

The Walsh Act also establishes the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (42 U.S.C.16911), abbreviated as SORNA, which requires U.S. jurisdictions (states and territories) to update their sex offender registration laws to conform with federal guidelines. States in noncompliance face a 10 percent penalty in their Bureau of Justice Assistance grant money.

State Governments

All 50 states and the District of Columbia require convicted sex offenders to register with their state, even if they have completed their sentence and have been rehabilitated.

Many states have laws that even restrict residency within a certain number of feet of a school or day care; however, these laws vary from state to state.

California Leads the Way

California became the first state to have a sex offender registration program in 1947. In 2006, the California Attorney General stated in an official report that sex offenders are not a protected class.

THE HONORABLE NICOLE M. PARRA, MEMBER OF THE STATE ASSEMBLY, has requested an opinion on the following question: Does the prohibition against the unauthorized use of registered sex offender identifying information obtained from the California “Megan’s Law” Web site qualify registered sex offenders as a “protected class” for purposes of housing discrimination under the Fair Employment and Housing Act? CONCLUSION The prohibition against the unauthorized use of registered sex offender identifying information obtained from the California “Megan’s Law” Web site does not in itself qualify registered sex offenders as a “protected class” for purposes of housing discrimination under the Fair Employment and Housing Act.

Various state supreme court hearings have occurred over the years, including notable cases in Hawaii, Alaska, Missouri, and Florida, but most discuss the topic of retroactive application of the law, not whether it is currently applicable.

Local Governments

Each county must abide by federal and state legislation, but are allowed to add onto, or attempt to fight the top-down legislation. However few (if any) have succeeded in establishing sex offenders as a protected class.

Seattle Attempted to Fight

In 2010-2011, the Seattle Office for Civil Rights launched a campaign to make it easier for registered sex offenders, among others with arrest and conviction records, to find housing and employment.

After public backlash, the Seattle Office for Civil Rights scaled down the effort to exclude any specific mention of sex offenders from the campaign.

In a Q&A pamphlet, entitled “Proposed protections to end discrimination in housing and employment based on arrest/conviction record” the following question is answered:

Q. Would this mean that landlords would have to accept people with a record of violent or sexual offenses as tenants? No. The proposal that we are exploring would prevent housing providers from discriminating against any and all applicants solely on the basis of a conviction or arrest. Applicants’ records would be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. If a landlord felt that an applicant’s record poses a threat to the safety of residents, s/he would still have the discretion to deny housing. Other places in the United States that have passed similar protections require landlords to look into the context of the conviction, the amount of time that has passed, and any rehabilitation that has occurred. The Seattle Office for Civil Rights would work with housing providers, community advocates and employers to develop similar rules.

Seattle has a long list of protected classes, and yet sex offenders are not included.

Protected Classes in Seattle:

Age

Ancestry

Breastfeeding in a public place

Color

Creed

Disability

Gender identity

Marital status

National Origin

Parental status

Political ideology

Race

Religion

Sex

Sexual orientation

Use of a Section 8 certificate

Use of a service animal

Military status or Veteran

In fact, Seattle’s Official Fair Housing Handbook, page 21, even clarifies that a history of sex offense does not qualify as a disability:

47. Who does not have a disability?

Under fair housing laws, the definition does not include: sex offenders

current illegal drug users (however, fair housing laws do protect people who are recovering from substance abuse)

those with convictions for the illegal manufacture or distribution of a controlled substance Under fair housing laws, the definition does not include:

This citing does not exclude sex offenders from having other legitimate and protected disabilities, it simply validates that the status as a sex offender is not a disability in itself.

Additional Resources

Conclusion

Based on this research, I’ve come to the conclusion that while convicted sex offenders are indeed a specific class, they are not a protected class and do not have special rights and leniencies when being considered for housing.

Though there are notable tiers of offenses, confirming that some crimes are worse than others, the choice to commit a crime is exactly that, a choice. And with all choices, there are consequences.

As of yet, I have not been able to find a federal, state, or local law that identifies sex offenders as a protected class for purposes of housing discrimination under the Fair Employment and Housing Act.

Let’s Figure this Out Together!

I’m not a lawyer nor can I give legal advice. I am simply a landlord who wants to know what the housing laws say about sex offenders.

Though I’ve made a notable attempt at researching these statutes at multiple levels of government, I realize this research is not exhaustive.

If you know of a statute or law that supports sex offenders as a protected class, please let me know. I’ll add it to this article, and we’ll examine the evidence together.

Get our free newsletter Join 200,000+ landlords ​Tips to increase income

Time-saving techniques

​Powerful tools & resources ​Your privacy is safe