Prince Knight

2015-07-08 10:25:58 -0400

The “scientific method” requires that any theory be hammered from all sides, repeatedly, to see if it fails, even once. If it fails even once, the theory is invalid, and needs to be approached again, from a different standpoint. If it passes all tests, it may be considered “fact”.



Facts, logic, and even history have disproven this man-caused global warming/climate change theory, and yet they still present it as fact. Forest fires, such as this ironic article describes, volcanoes, sunspots all contribute much more than man does. Hell, all we need to do is go back to the 70s when kids (including myself, but I haven’t grown up yet) were taught about global cooling and the coming ice age. Cleaning up pollution was a huge issue, because it was surmised that all the particulate thrown into the atmosphere was blocking the sun’s rays, so the earth was cooling. Industry was cleaned up, and the smog drastically reduced. Hey, guess what? The earth is “warming”!



So why aren’t they permitting pollution again, to control this “temperature increase”?



Further, roughly 1000 years ago the climate was MUCH warmer than it is now — how else did they have year ‘round settlements on the west coast of Greenland? And with a miniscule fraction of today’s earth’s population? And no heavy industry? And no hydrocarbon-burning machines?



Facts, logic, and history have disproven this theory, but we’re called “deniers” and marginalized.



“There is none so blind as he who will not see.” And they won’t see. Their minds are made up; don’t confuse them with facts.

commented