Two of the region’s more conservative government bodies — the Escondido City Council and the county Board of Supervisors — will decide soon whether to join a growing backlash against the state’s “sanctuary” laws.

Escondido Mayor Sam Abed and Councilman John Masson have put an item on the April 4 agenda that would authorize the city’s filing of a legal brief in support of the federal government’s lawsuit challenging three state laws enacted last year.

“I expect it to pass,” Abed said Wednesday.

The San Diego County Board of Supervisors is expected to discuss the matter in closed session on April 17.


“I’ve always supported the great working relationship between the Sheriff’s Department and federal law enforcement agencies, and it needs to continue,” said Supervisor Dianne Jacob, adding she intends to support the county joining the lawsuit.

Escondido appears to be the first city in San Diego County to tackle the issue.

The inland North County city would join the Orange County Board of Supervisors, which on Tuesday voted 4-0 to join the federal lawsuit as a “friend of the court.” Several other cities in Orange County are also beginning to take action against the state’s sanctuary laws.

Senate Bill 54, signed by Gov. Jerry Brown last year, prohibits state and local police agencies from notifying federal officials in many cases when they have unauthorized immigrants in their custody who could be subject to deportation.


San Diego County supervisors, all Republicans, will consider the Trump Administration’s lawsuit against the state’s sanctuary policy as well as California’s lawsuit against the administration’s decision to ask about citizenship in the 2020 census when members convene in closed session on April 17, said a spokeswoman for Supervisor Kristin Gaspar.

The board typically doesn’t discuss lawsuits openly, but any decision to take a side in the cases would later become a matter of public record.

In an interview Wednesday, San Diego County Sheriff Bill Gore said he does not think the county should get involved in the administration’s lawsuit against the state’s sanctuary policies.

“I’d tell them stay out of it...that would be my recommendation,” he said.


Deputies shouldn’t act as immigration officers because it might deter people who are in the country illegally from reporting crimes, making them vulnerable to victimhood, he said.

“For domestic violence, they won’t report it to the cops if they’re in the country illegally,” Gore said.

Escondido Police Chief Craig Carter said he preferred not to comment since he hasn’t seen what his council is proposing.

In 2006, Escondido made national headlines when it tried to enact an ordinance that would have punished local landlords who rented dwellings to unauthorized immigrants.


The city became the focus of large protests, Fox News broadcast live from beneath the green dome in front of City Hall, and the rift in the city between its Latino and white populations intensified. That was exacerbated by what some thought were controversial DUI and driver’s license checkpoints conducted by local police, often in Latino parts of town, as well as other policies adopted by the council around the same time.

The city has been trying to distance itself from racial issues ever since.

Though the city is more than 50 percent Latino, Escondido Councilwoman Olga Diaz, the lone Democrat and Latina on the council, often finds herself on the losing end of 4-1 votes. She said Wednesday she has not yet seen what the council will be asked to vote on next week, but said she will “be engaged” when the vote is taken.

“Here we go again,” she said.


“What I do know is that it’s an election year and every time it’s an election year Sam (Abed) has some kind of immigration thing he wants to discuss or have sort of vivid in people’s minds,” she said.

Both Abed and Masson, strong conservatives who have been outspoken about the federal government’s lack of a comprehensive immigration policy and are the two council members who have placed the item of the agenda, are running for re-election this November.

Diaz said a few years ago the council adopted a policy she feels applies to this case.

“We have a council policy that says we will only put things on the agenda that directly affect the city of Escondido and that we will not be taking positions on things that are not city issues,” she said.


“I would imagine this is the kind of thing that policy was meant to prevent.”

Supporters will argue that the sanctuary and other state laws dealing with immigration have a direct impact on what happens in their city.

Last April, the Escondido council passed a resolution expressing opposition to SB 54, saying it did not “provide protection for local communities because it expressly prohibits local law enforcement, who are most likely to come into contact with violent offenders unlawfully in the United States, from communicating effectively with federal authorities who are the only agencies who have the authority to remove these individuals from the country.”


jharry.jones@sduniontribune.com; 760/529-4931; Twitter: @jharryjones