Explaining the change, Ilamaran says that earlier when a student was asked to write about his place, all the 40-odd students in a class, for example in Chennai, would write about the same place. But now, each student would be writing differently about his place.

“Earlier, students depended on book bank questions. Now, that has been done away with. Questions will be asked from the book and it is essential that the students read the textbooks thoroughly. Memorising, which has been a bane of Tamil Nadu students, will no more work. This will help the students in states to face competitive exams without any fear,” says Ilamaran.

More importantly, content-based textbook has now became concept-based. The old myth of “textbook is Gita, Bible and Quran” is slowly changing and the book is now an appetiser, says Kumar.

It is now possible for teachers to take classes for students with an Android phone. “No other state has such a facility,” says Ilamaran, adding that other states have smart classes but not the mobile facility. “Today, even a five-year-old child can operate an Android phone. The changed syllabus will make all students tech savvy,” he adds.

The other feature of the reforms, according to Kumar, is the administration reforms that are being carried out. A revenue district is normally divided into two or three educational districts for better administration with a chief educational officer put in charge of the revenue district and a district educational officer (DEO) for the educational district. “From this year, more educational districts have been created and more DEOs will take charge. This will help in better administration of every educational district,” he adds.

In order to ensure that students benefit from the reforms, the government has made workshops and training part and parcel of the education system.

“Training for teachers to teach students from the new syllabus and training for DEOs on administration reforms are some of good initiatives the government has taken,” says Kumar.

Shaukath says the government is changing the teaching methods, especially looking to simplify things.

According to Ilamaran, the state government has set up 402 centres that will train students for competitive exams to take the reforms forward. Each educational district will have at least four such centres.

One reason why the state has been able to go forward with its reforms is the free hand given by Education Minister K A Sengottaiyan. “The minister never interfered with the functioning of the officials. He gave total freedom to carry out the reforms,” the Tamil Nadu Teachers Association president said.

Kumar says he was told that Sengottaiyan encouraged state-level directors in the education department to go for the reforms, besides giving them full support and freedom. “He is also addressing the state-level training workshops,” he adds.

Shaukath says it will be difficult to say if the reforms will help education in Tamil Nadu to be on a par with CBSE. “The syllabus certainly will be on a par with CBSE but the implementation will need to be seen,” she says.

Ilamaran says the reforms will see education standards in Tamil Nadu better CBSE. “So far, we have not implemented the question pattern of CBSE. Had this happened earlier, it would have helped all,’ he says.

Kumar, however, is cautious. “If the new textbook and training are properly handled, there is a better chance for it (to be at par with CBSE). The need of the hour is change in the aptitude of teachers to adapt to the changes,” he says.

Though it is too early to say if the reforms are bringing about any changes, Kumar says one sea change is that students have begun using QR code.

Shaukath says it is too early to pass a judgement. “There is some positive response from the teachers with respect to the simplified pedagogy,” she says.

On the other hand, Ilamaran says the state can expect dividends of the change from 2020 onwards. “Next year, too, the reforms may not help students writing NEET,” he says.

Experts in the field of education do have a word of caution on the reforms launched by Tamil Nadu. Shaukath says the reforms are resource intensive. “If the quality of training isn’t at par with the quality of content, then all efforts would be in vain,” she says.

“Reforms should be implemented in phases,” says Kumar, adding that Rome wasn’t built in a day. “One of the drawbacks of the reforms is that the government is expecting immediate results. Reforms on the academic side should be followed by reforms in management and administration. There are many flaws in administration of schools. These should be set right to get the best results,” says Kumar.

Explaining his views, the youth thinkers forum leader says in some schools the headmaster is given more administrative work than academic work. “They (headmasters) are managers of school rather than academicians. So, changes in a single direction will result in a growth that is not uniform,” Kumar adds.

Ilamaran says teachers need to be trained well ahead of the start of the academic year. Besides, infrastructure in government schools need to be improved. “Good syllabus, good teachers and good infrastructure are the key to reforms yielding results,” he says, adding that teachers should be given independence from just sticking to teaching children from the syllabus. “It will help to enrich students knowledge. It is better than to stick to notes of lessons. Importantly, the government should expect results from students and not teachers,” he cautions.