Freedom of religion, not freedom from religion. from a Republican in Ketchikan, AK

ABSOLUTELY NO!!!! We were founded at a Christian nation and should continue. from a Republican in Lowell, MA

Oh, eternal and everlasting God, direct my thoughts, words and work. Wash away my sins in the immaculate blood of the Lamb and purge my heart by Thy Holy Spirit. Daily, frame me more and more in the likeness of Thy son, Jesus Christ, that living in Thy fear, and dying in Thy favor, I may in thy appointed time obtain the resurrection of the justified unto eternal life. Bless, O Lord, the whole race of mankind and let the world be filled with the knowledge of Thee and Thy son, Jesus Christ.

- George Washington



We have this day [Fourth of July] restored the Sovereign to whom all men ought to be obedient. He reigns in Heaven, and from the rising to the setting of the sun, let His Kingdom come.

- Samuel Adams



Congress printed a Bible for America and said:

“The United States in Congress assembled … recommend this edition of the Bible to the inhabitants of the United States … a neat edition of the Holy Scriptures for the use of schools.”

- United States Congress 1782



Congress passed this resolution:

“The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.”

- United States Congress 1782



There is no such thing as separation of Church and state, no where can it be found in the founding documents. It was made up by a bigoted judge on the U.S. Spreme Court. from a Republican in Lakemore, OH

Yes - this nation was not and is not a Christian nation. Pursuant to the 1st Amendment, there is no established faith for the USA; ergo, any references to God in or on government property or currency should be removed. from a Libertarian in Albuquerque, NM

Since what we have now is actually a part of the history of our country, it should be left as is, however, adding anything in the future would clearly be a violation of the separation of church and state. from a Libertarian in Billings, MT

America was founded by Christians, and just because we let foreigners move here that don't hold our current stances doesn't make it right for them to take away ours. If this were the case then we shouldn't allow other churches within the... from a Democrat in Belleville, IL

Give to Caesar what is Caesar's. Christ was very clear about this. If one religious creed is accepted, then where is the free speech to others who also want to be accepted. Leave what currently stands, but exclude from future. Let religious... from a Democrat in Sun City, AZ

If you're going to nit pick division of church and state then say out of the bible when denying gays the right to marriage; women the right to an abortion or birth control - you can't pick and choose. from a Democrat in Forest Park, OH

Our rights are God-given. George Washington would have considered such a proposal to be very destructive: "Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man... from a Republican in Dunedin, FL

Tough question. Christianity is a large part of our national heritage and I don't think it should be swept under the rug as if it is shameful. However, the first amendment exists for a reason, and no one should be forced to share in a faith they... from a Republican in Coppell, TX

Yes, religion is the root of all evil. It is a vessel for power and control. from a Green in Hollywood, FL

No, America should make Fat Jesus the replacement of Christianity and the church should run the state. from a Constitution in Flemington, NJ

No, total removal would be a large cost for a generally low value goal. from a Democrat in Tucson, AZ

The first amendment is about protecting citizens from government interference in their religious practices, not about removing the influence of religion from the public arena, including government activities. I fail to see how references to God on money... from a Constitution in Tuckahoe, VA

Much of the "cryptic" symbols & references on our US American currency came about during our struggles to become a "new nation" during the past 400+ years. People from other countries (with their OWN cryptic symbols &... from a Republican in Boston, MA

Yes, from this point forward. However, history is history and this is an unnecessary expense. It shows us where we have been and how we evolve. from a Democrat in Blairsville, GA

No. The reference is too important for the freedoms of man. It says that our rights come from a higher power than that of a mortal man, and being that we are born with them, they cannot be taken away. That is much more important than any religious... from a Republican in Marionville, MO

No, because if the religious sector feels it is beneficial to their beliefs then allow them the comfort as having it as a symbol of their faith and trust. If one is Atheist then it ought not to affect them one way or another. I as an agnostic am okay with... from a Democrat in Spring Valley, NV

I dont really care, just as long it doesnt seem that we are a country run by a religion. from a Green in Miami, FL

No, as long as they don't say that all the other religions have to believe in God. Some People just get to offended. from a Democrat in Winder, GA

It dont matter. from a Democrat in York, PA

No because it's been there for a long time and hasn't hurt anyone prior to now. from a Democrat in Garden City, ID

Religious freedom is a must in this country. Although many common religions even non Christian based, praise a for of God, it is never in the same light as the Christian version the US projects. This practice only alienates those who do not believe in the... from a Democrat in Altamonte Springs, FL

If they were placed there at the time the monument was erected then that is part of the original architecture and design and should not be messed with. Anything new unless it is a memorial, which the memorial can include religious references, should not... from a Democrat in Duluth, GA

Yes, have and keep separation of church and state. from a Libertarian in Jefferson, OR

No - we have more important things to worry about for the immediate future. from a Republican in Eugene, OR

No, because taxpayers money going toward the removal of "references" is frivolous. from a Democrat in Everett, WA

I just think this is politically impossible to achieve. from a Green in Springfield, MO

Everything but the national monuments, which are monuments of history, which may include references to God because the references are part of history. from a Libertarian in Potwin, KS

I am torn because I believe that we were brought up on separation, with people believing in different gods, but than I also think that Taking down monuments and other things that represent god is a bad idea because it has been their for so long. from a Democrat in Seattle, WA

It is fiat anyway so what would God care and why should we even use these FRN's that enslave us? It is the biggest FRAUD in history!. from a Republican in New Freedom, PA

Yes if they are going to separate church and state then they need to do that completely not when it benefits them. from a Democrat in Seattle, WA

Does it really matter? Get over it people. from a Democrat in Fosterville, TN

It doesn't hurt me so I don't care. from a Democrat in Warrensburg, MO

Take it off of our money but on everything else is should remain the same. And it should not be removed from anything else. from a Republican in Spokane, WA

Yes, to aspects of government. Forms of art and such should be allowed because of freedom of artistic expression. from a Democrat in Ypsilanti, MI

Yes, I am religious, but don't want the government to privilege even my views. from a Democrat in Hobart, IN

No, these buildings, monuments, and other aspects of government are historical landmarks, and shouldn’t be defiled because some pussy has his feelings hurt. from a Libertarian in Roachdale, IN

No. Respect for God's laws will result in national success. "Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is [i.e., brings God's] reproach to any people." -- Solomon. Unfortunately many U.S. citizens consider themselves to be wiser than Solomon. from a Republican in Potwin, KS

Yes, but leave references in place where it is a part of the original structure. from a Democrat in Carlsborg, WA

No, because the change is purely cosmetic. The money is better spent doing more practical things. from a Democrat in San Ramon, CA

No! We should uphold and strengthen the Judeo Christian values. It has been the very foundation that has made this country great and held us together as the wealthiest and most giving country in the world. from a Republican in East Olympia, WA

Not if it going to cost taxpayers money to remove the references. from a Democrat in Brooklyn, NY

The government should worry about more important things like the budget, health care, and unemployment. We waste enough money just printing it in the first place. Changing it costs more. from a Libertarian in Comstock Park, MI

Take it off currency. Don't add it to anything new. Keep it in existing monuments. from a Libertarian in West Sacramento, CA

No. That would be a waste of time and money. from a Green in Waldron, MO

I believe something promoting human advancement would be pleasing. from a Democrat in West Jordan, UT

Leave it alone. "In god we trust" is the equivalent of saying merry Christmas instead of happy holidays it's not meant to offend or exclude. We just don't need to add it to anything new. from a Democrat in Durham, NC

Restore 'e pluribus unum'. from a Republican in Potwin, KS

Having god referenced on a coin or in a song or in a pledge is fine. But the separation of church and state means that references to god should not used in deciding federal laws and policies. from a Democrat in Medford, NY