This story is part of a joint project between the Center for Responsive Politics and the Center for Public Integrity. The main story, “Super PACs, Nonprofits Favored Romney Over Obama: Citizens United Decision Helped Romney Neutralize Obama’s Fundraising Advantage,” can be found here.

In the 2012 election, nonprofits have been the preferred vehicle for donors who prefer to keep their identities secret. But with the right lawyers, super PACs, which are supposedly transparent about their donors, can accomplish the same feat.

Social welfare nonprofits, known as 501(c)(4)s by the Internal Revenue Service, file tax returns with the IRS. The names of their top donors are revealed to the IRS — but not to the public.

Super PACs, on the other hand, do report their donors. In some instances, though, those donors are nonprofits. Or the funds might come from shell corporations, which have passed through millions of dollars to the political organizations from unidentified donors in this election.

Aetna’s oops



Insurance giant Occasionally, the veil is lifted on the secrecy of these groups, sometimes inadvertantly.Insurance giant Aetna accidentally disclosed earlier this year to insurance regulators that it had contributed $3 million to the American Action Network , a 501(c)(4) group that has spent $11 million targeting mostly Democratic candidates for Congress.

The company later scrubbed the disclosure from its filing and declined to elaborate on it despite demands from institutional shareholders for an explanation.

Aetna also has a corporate political action committee, which is funded by employees and limited in what it can take in and spend. It has spent $2.6 million in the last three cycles combined, a fraction of what is spent by the PACs of other insurance giants.

Last week, the New American Energy Opportunity Foundation, a 501(c)(4) group led by two executives at an oil and gas company, revealed it had paid for nearly $800,000 in radio ads targeting President Barack Obama on his energy policy and the funds came thanks to a donation from Las Vegas casino titan Sheldon Adelson

Adelson and his family have given more than $53 million to super PACs this election.

Shell corporations

Not all secret money comes from nonprofits.

On Sept. 26, a corporation was formed in Knoxville, Tenn., with the most mundane of names: Specialty Group, Inc. On its registration paperwork, one name was listed, that of attorney William S. Rose Jr. The address provided was a home owned by Rose.

Specialty sent several checks totaling $5.2 million to FreedomWorks for America , a super PAC affiliated with the tea party network and with former Republican House Majority Leader Dick Armey.

The donations make Specialty Group the sixth-largest organization contributing money to super PACs, and only a handful of individuals have contributed more.

Rose could not be reached for comment and all listed phone numbers have been disconnected.

Specialty Group, Inc., isn’t the first apparent shell corporation–a company with no known physical presence, product or staff–to throw cash into the post-Citizens United campaign finance arena.

In 2011, two other shell companies, one called Eli Publishing and the other called F8 LLC, both incorporated at the same address in an office building in downtown Provo, Utah, contributed $1 million to Restore Our Future , the super PAC backing Mitt Romney.

The suite number given for both corporations doesn’t actually exist, and there is no office, but the registered agents for both companies had connections to Nu Skin, a multi-level marketing cosmetic company founded by conservative Utah resident Steve Lund.

No official confirmation has ever been made, however, and Lund and his wife have gone on to contribute a combined $1 million, in their own names, to Restore Our Future.

The extended money trail



Taking money from hard to track shell corporations isn’t the only way for a super PAC to skirt disclosure rules.

Another common tactic is for a nonprofit to give money to a super PAC. This happens frequently when a nonprofit is closely affiliated with the super PAC it is giving money to.

In total, Center for Responsive Politics data shows that 501(c)(4) groups contributed at least $10 million to 46 different super PACs.



The super PAC Sen. Dick Lugar , R-Ind.’s failed bid for re-election stopped at the primary when he lost to Richard Mourdock , his tea party affiliated opponent. His loss wasn’t for lack of trying by a group called Indiana Values Super PAC , which spent $459,000 to defeat Mourdock.The super PAC received $137,000 of its funds from a 501(c)(4) group also called Indiana Values, based out of the office of a lobbying firm on K Street in Washington, D.C., where the money trail ends.

Sometimes the chain is longer, but with a similar end result.

At least $165,000 of that money came from another super PAC, called Fight for the Dream based out of a post office box at a UPS Store in Allentown. Fight for the Dream in turn got all of its money from a nonprofit called Restore the Dream, based out of the very same post office box.

Organizers told the Center for Responsive Politics that the group was designed with the help of their legal counsel, a lawyer named Anthony Ferate. Ferate is also an in-house lobbyist for natural gas company Devon Energy.

He denied there was anything improper about the setup, and said in an interview with CRP that it is a widespread practice.

“This was set up within federal election laws,” he said. “I would disagree that there’s anything to question about transfers between super PACS. In fact, the Democrats are coordinating between their super PACs.” (Update, Nov. 2: Ferate said he is no longer involved with the groups.)

According to a CRP analysis, the super PAC that is the single largest recipient of cash from a nonprofit is FreedomWorks For America, the same super PAC that received $5.2 million from the Tennessee shell corporation.

CRP data shows the group received $2.3 million from its own nonprofit, FreedomWorks. That means that although the group has disclosed $15.4 million in donations, but $7.5 million of it has been untraceable.

This story is a collaboration between the Center for Public Integrity and the Center for Responsive Politics . For up-to-date news on outside spending in the 2012 election, follow our Source2012 Tumblr and the hashtag #Source2012 on Twitter.



For permission to reprint for commercial uses, such as textbooks, contact the Center: Feel free to distribute or cite this material, but please credit the Center for Responsive Politics.For permission to reprint for commercial uses, such as textbooks, contact the Center: [email protected]

·

·

Support Accountability Journalism At OpenSecrets.org we offer in-depth, money-in-politics stories in the public interest. Whether you’re reading about 2020 presidential fundraising, conflicts of interest or “dark money” influence, we produce this content with a small, but dedicated team. Every donation we receive from users like you goes directly into promoting high-quality data analysis and investigative journalism that you can trust. Please support our work and keep this resource free. Thank you. Support OpenSecrets ➜

About The Author Russ joined the Center in March 2012 as the money-in-politics reporter. His duties include reporting for OpenSecrets Blog and assisting with press inquiries. Russ has a background in investigative journalism, having worked as a reporter for the Investigative Reporting Workshop at American University, and he spent five years as a newspaper reporter in New Hampshire. He has a degree in political science from Muhlenberg College and a M.A. in journalism and public affairs from American University. Follow Russ Choma

Read more of Russ's posts

Read more OpenSecrets News & Analysis: