Humans are hyper-social. Everything we think, feel, and do is influenced by our social experiences. This is the case even when we are alone as past, current, and future social experiences and culture itself continue to shape us.

What I am basically saying is there is no , emotion, or action independent of a social component for humans. That might sound like an extreme view, and maybe it is, but I honestly can't imagine an argument that could counter it.

Now, in the midst of this, many people, perhaps all people, feel to varying degrees as though their subjective experiences are not shared by other people. In their minds what they think, see, feel, is not what other people think, see, feel. This is perhaps best echoed in statements such as "I feel like I am living in a different universe to everyone else."

This is why research on "I-sharing" — sharing a subjective experience with someone else - is so powerful. This work shows that this can improve relationships between members of different racial groups (e. ., less dehumanization and ), and generally increase feelings of closeness with other people. What's remarkable, I think, is that these shared experiences are often seemingly trivial, such as another participant in the study wanting to be a specific animal that you would want to be out of a list of four animals provided. Both want to be a turtle? Well dang, time to feel some social connection.

I-sharing is most powerful among people who feel existential isolation. And current research headed by Peter Helm at the University of Arizona shows that existential isolation tends to be stronger among men than women. But why?

These researchers first conducted a survey to test if this could be accounted for by differences in . This was not the case as the gender difference existed even when controlling for the influence of being lonely.

In a follow up survey they found that valuing communal traits (e.g., kindness, warmth, ) was associated with less existential isolation. Further, the reason males had more existential isolation than females was because women tended to value communal traits more highly.

This work is consistent with a broad range of research showing that males are restricted in the range of emotions that are deemed socially acceptable (at least males tend to think this). Being warm, kind, and emotional really at all (except for ) is not viewed by males as desirable (relative to for females). As such, males feel existential isolation, because they accept social norms that impede their ability to truly connect with other people.