Outside the town of Yalta, Crimea today, the Speaker of Russia's lower parliament calls for today's global powers to remember the lessons of Yalta. Really I have to ask: What could those be? Does anyone have any idea?



The rehabilitation of Soviet dictator Josef Stalin continues as the Russians don't waste any time in putting up a huge monument to reinforce their claim to a disputed land mass.

Today, Russians unveiled a 10-ton monument of Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin to mark the 70th Anniversary of their so-called "Big Three" summit from Feb. 4-11, 1945 in the town of Yalta on the Crimean Peninsula.

The 300,000 native Crimean Taters, who are Muslim and boycotted last year's referendum, have been against the installation of the sculpture because they were persecuted under Josef Stalin's rule--accused of collaborating with National Socialist Germany and deported to Central Asia. Many died of disease and starvation.

Stalin is the tallest

The sculpture by Russian Zurab Tsereteli depicts the leaders seated on chairs as in the familiar, widely propagated photographs, with a sickly U.S President Roosevelt seated between Britain's Churchill on the left and the Soviet despot Stalin on the right. Not surprisingly, Stalin is 4 inches higher than his co-criminals which are 10 ft. high.



From AFP:

Speaking at the unveiling ceremony, Sergei Naryshkin, speaker of the Russian parliament's lower house, said that as global powers seek to settle the Ukraine crisis the West should remember the lessons of the Yalta talks [Yikes, what lessons?] including "readiness for dialogue." [But the reality is that Stalin dominated the talks because Roosevelt was incapacitated and had Soviet moles on his "team" at Yalta, while Britain was in too weak a position to stand up to Stalin. This was a conference that should never have taken place.] But analyst Vyacheslav Nikonov, grandson of Stalin's foreign minister Vyacheslav Molotov, said it was hardly possible to stage a similar meeting now. "The West lacks political figures of the calibre of Churchill and Roosevelt," he told AFP. Oh wow, these two murderers and world-wreckers are what the Russian government holds in high esteem. Today, there is no one up to that level to meet with current Soviet murderer-in-chief Vlad Putin

Also of note:

Tsereteli first hoped to see the monument installed a decade ago but Ukrainian authorities dropped the plan after outraged Crimean Tatars took to the streets across the peninsula. Ukraine, then under strong Russian dominance to install the offensive sculpture, used the fierce objections of the Taters to derail the project. Now, with the Russian takeover, it appears, as a symbol of Russia's dogmatic assertions as to the "absolute goodness" of the WWII victory that resulted from the unnatural joining of the West and East.



Comparable to Jewish takeover of land

My further reaction to this surprising event is to compare it to the way Jews immediately erect large monuments to themselves on land that they have determined is a Jewish burial ground of "hundreds of holocaust victims" without turning over more than a foot of ground. They then declare that their religious laws against "disturbing the dead" applies, preventing any investigation from taking place. See the end of my ariticle here. Soviet monuments and Jewish monuments are very similar in looks and in purpose.



This is the Russia that so many Whites are trying to tell us are the "good guys" in this conflict with Ukraine. I can only see such a stance as a completely unprincipled position.

