IMHO



There are two possibilities.



1. He's got a working system that really works and he's beating off investors with an oak rod negotiating tax free dollars and a house in Majorca,



OR



2. He can't replicate squat and is refocusing his life on commercial real estate sales while the market is good





I don't know which is real, but IMHO, the force is with you, or not.



Simple question.



If you found the cure for all cancers, would you hold back to maximize your personal ROI or give everything you know unconditionally?



Sounds like Roger has some corporate funding that includes an NDA.



Question about your frustum dimensions... With a frustum that small how would you introduce microwaves, without significantly altering the resonance. It seems that might have been one of the problems that Tajmar and Fielder ran into.



Wasn't there mention somewhere that Roger had some funding/contract with Boeing? That would very likely come with property rights and an NDA.



Roger has told me SPR has multiple licensees, which I suspect pay fees. Not good for Roger to disclose what they consider to be proprietary information and have a bunch of angry licensees.



To my understanding, Roger has disclosed as much as he wishes to disclose. Apparently he has no desire to upset any contracts and/or NDA obligations that are current binding on him.



Okay, so it seems like people have either ignored or forgotten about the fact that you can actually go and look up Satellite Propulsion Limited's (SPRs)and. There is no need for this completely baseless speculation into NDA's, corporate contracts and investors, licensing agreements, the SPR "team", etc, because you can actually look at theand tell right then and there what's what.I'm going to do my best in the following post to:1) Summarize and link everything I previously posted on the subject.2) Address some of the specific concerns raised in the last few pages.3) Illustrate that Shawyer, while not necessarily a fraud, has been obviously misleading TheTraveller (TT).First, here is the link to UK Companies House where all of this data is. Don't take my word for it. Anyone who has had accounting 101 can read the balance sheets and come to their own conclusions.Here is a list of every post I have made on the subject of SPRs financials: SPR has been in debt to the tune of roughly 230,000 pounds since 2011 , with no appreciable change in their balance sheet. It is an inactive company. I summarize SPRs Intellectual property (IP) position , and demonstrate that SPR has burned through oversince inception in October, 2000.To those who don't want to read all that and don't want to work through the companies house list on their own, I will summarize: Here is the annual return (which shareholder owns what) made up to Oct.21st/2015. It has not changed in years. There are no corporate investors.Looking at the balance sheet, there have been no changes in tangible assets since at least 2011.. It is to all extents and purposes inactive, since even R&D companies have to buy stuff now and then.Looking at the balance sheets, it is impossible to imagine SPR ever having an employee or employees, much less the SPR "team". Unless these employees were magically unpaid...If SPR has these licensee's, they sure as hell don't get paid for them. Once again, look at the balance sheets. No need to speculate.So:This is a bit of a false dichotomy, but it sure isn't option 1.Roger unequivocally does NOT have corporate funding as of Oct 21st of this year.Roger does not have a funding contract with Boeing (He himself has said as much in an aviation week interview).No. Roger has no licensees that pay fees, and never has.Maybe, by the magic of terrible business practices, Roger has signed NDAs with external parties without actually getting paid for them. It is at least a possibility, and stupider things have happened. Personally, I have a hard time thinking anyone could be that clueless. Idoubt Roger has an NDA.So now to point (3). In my opinion, Roger has been deliberately misleading in the information he has given to TT and which has been subsequently passed on to this forum. If you look through the balance sheets and the annual returns which are all right here , you'll see there is no team, or licensees, or big contracts that would necessitate an NDA. SPR hasn't bought things in years. It has moved a few pounds between accounts; that's it. It never had cash flows that would have been commensurate with employees or contracts.So we really only have two options:1) SPR has intentionally misfiled it's public records.2) Roger has been intentionally misleading about the state SPR is in.It leave it to the audience of this forum to choose which one they think it is.