Breaking: Evelyn Farkas ties to Crowdstrike...The rabbit hole is deep..in the deep state Posted by Captain Drago Postedon 3/31/17 at 2:40 pm 69 6

The key to all of this is the Atlantic Council. The vehemently anti-russian think tank that Dr. Farkas is a senior fellow.



Most people think that the FBI analyzed the DNC servers and came to the conclusion based on their analysis that Russia hacked the DNC. That is not true. The DNC refused to let the FBI look at their servers. Instead the DNC hired a private company, Crowdstrike, to do an analysis of their servers. It was Crowdstrike that concluded that Russia hacked the DNC. They then turned over those findings to the FBI.



If this sounds incredibly shady its because it is. While private companies do such analysis its very odd that in a case where national security is involved that FBI/CIA analysts were not allowed to do their own analysis of the evidence. This isn't someone hacking card readers at a McDonald's. This is a hack of the DNC during the presidential campaign. That the FBI was not allowed to look at the servers is unconscionable. It sounds eerily similar to the Duke lacrosse rape case. Nifong didn't let the state forensic office analyze the evidence. Instead he hired a private company to do it and that componay found what Nifong wanted them to find.



So what do we know about Crowdstrike? Well Crowdstrike was founded by Dmitri Alperovitch, a Ukrainian National, who just like Dr. Farkas is a fellow at, you guessed it, Atlantic Council. So we have one senior fellow at this think tank pushing for the administration to get and desiminate everything they can on a Trump/Russia connection and we have this other senior fellow at the Atlantic council Dmitri Alperovitch establishing the case that it was Russia that hacked the DNC.



Now answer me this. I'm sure Crowdstrike has a good reputation in most circumstances, but can a company founded by a vehemently anti-Russian Ukrainian, who is a member of this vehemently anti-Russian think tank, be trusted to do a fair unbiased analysis when there is a question of Russian involvement?



