Speaking for myself, it seems like a terrible catch 22.

State law as I understand it (I am not a lawyer IANAL), allows anonymous requests for public records. They are, after all, public and generally we want government to be open. On the other hand this seems really obviously a setup for theft and harassment for people exercising their article1 section 24 civil right. I don't know how many carve outs we want for public records, I really wish WSP had thought to NOT ask for this information. Given that it's there, and can be anonymously requested and that serving court papers on someone who is anonymous is... "hard" I think if I were on that list I'd check my alarm system and be sure everything was in the safe.

If I knew a lawyer who was on this list I would be asking if they could help us under rcw 42.56.540 but... at very best that's only an injunction for _this_ request and this would be in courts that haven't been kind to this one particular civil right (IANAL and all IMO)