If you will click onto Crowleys cross you will find more information from L Ron Hubbard's son , who said, in his 1983 interview with Penthouse Magazine:

"I believed in Satanism. There was no other religion in the house! Scientology and black magic. What a lot of people don't realize is that Scientology is black magic that is just spread out over a long time period. To perform black magic generally takes a few hours or, at most, a few weeks. But in Scientology it's stretched out over a lifetime, and so you don't see it. Black magic is the inner core of Scientology --and it is probably the only part of Scientology that really works. Also, you've got to realize that my father did not worship Satan. He thought he was Satan. He was one with Satan."

Ron had a dark side. Chuck Murray, my old TRs supervisor and the original Volunteer Minister told us once back in 1980, You guys think Ron is Santa Clause. Let me tell you something. LRH is not a nice man.

Obviously this comment stuck with me. I still remember it vividly. The Affirmations, in their original handwritten version, were brought into evidence in open court in Los Angeles in mid-1984, and are part of the court record.

One of these affirmations of L Ron Hubbard, per page 58 of Messiah or Madman is:

Blockquote> All men shall be my slaves. All women shall succumb to my charms. All mankind shall grovel at my feet and not know why.

I would say that that qualifies as a pretty blatant evil purpose. Dont you agree?

Well, in any event, there certainly is a lot of groveling going on right now and most of us do not know why.

There are obvious truths in the tech and I personally feel that some of it is useful. Many well-intentioned people contributed to it, most without attribution by Hubbard. Hubbard himself said that we should always go to "source." Perhaps the unworkable techniques should be looked at and removed but the first step would require that the harmful practices of Scientology be brought to a end.

One is unlikely to do that because Keeping Scientology Working has been instilled in us so deeply. Many of us are convinced that the entire tech works. That is part of the problem.

Keeping Scientology Working is at the beginning of every course. We old-timers know that many contributed to the tech. This is obvious if you have pre-1991 tech volumes and admin volumes. A quick look at the Administrative Dictionary shows all the Board Technical Bulletins, none of which were written by LRH. Get the admin dictionary while you still can, before the golden age of admin is brought in. Take a look.

The new red and green volumes are stripped of their history. The older ones show who wrote or assisted on each policy letter and technical bulletin. They have memory.

Many individuals contributed to the tech. Volney Mathieson invented the e-meter, Alfred Korzybski discovered misunderstood word phenomenon and had insisted upon defining each word, Dr. Nandor Fodor argued prior to 1950 that birth and prenatal experiences could be re-experienced with a resultant betterment to behavior. Purportedly, William Sargant, an English Psychiatrist, toured Naval Hospitals in 1945 at the time when Ron was a patient. Ron was being treated for duodenal ulcer flare-ups. Hubbards Dianetics is strikingly similar to William Sargants Battle for the Mind. There were many others that Hubbard failed to credit.

When I first came into Scientology there was no purification program. People were running around in rubber suits on the sweat program. Many of us thought to use a sauna. It is human nature to look for ways to make things better.

A lot of class XII auditors authored or co-authored the tech and then Hubbard approved it and later claimed it as his own. Power processes are an example of this as is NOTs.

There were splinter groups and guys were going off on their own. They were actually making money. The monopoly called Scientology was being lost. Perhaps this is the main reason why Keeping Scientology Working was written in 1965.

Anyway, per this policy, if the tech works, learn it and use it. If it doesnt work get rid of it. There is much tech that doesnt work. Personally, I think we need to get rid of quite a lot of it. The problem is, with the current management it is impossible to correct it, much less get rid of it.

Clearly, disconnection is wrong with few exceptions. An SP like Joseph Stalin perhaps deserves such treatment. Few others do. The policy creates upset and can ruin lives.

HCOPL 16 May 1980 Issue I stated, The idea is to handle. Abrupt termination of a relationship, or disconnection is not a handling to be suggested or encouraged by any staff member and is forbidden. This remains a firm policy of the church. HCOPL 15 November 1968 had also cancelled disconnection.

To me, that sounded right. However, RTC canceled that policy, perhaps under Rons hidden advice. Per Robert Vaughn Youngs court affidavit at paragraph 29 of http://www.whyaretheydead.net/krasel/aff_rvy97.html he, meaning Vaughn, wrote the bulletin in 1983 reinstating disconnection. This was done on David Miscaviages orders and it never went to LRH for approval. This could mean that LRH wanted it reinstated with no evidence tracing it to him or it could mean Miscaviage acted alone. In either case, it should be cancelled and my children should be permitted to speak to me.

I am a little upset at LRH playing God with his policies, especially as it relates to my ability to communicate with my children. He would no doubt say it is my overts and withholds making me upset. Could love have something to do with it Ron? Did the thought ever cross your mind?

Did Ron ever love? Could he? Lets find out.

This is what he had to say about women in his 1947 handwritten, affirmations:

It doesn't give me displeasure to hear of a virgin being raped. The lot of women is to be fornicated." e) Sexual feeling has been depressed by several things amounting to a major impasse. To cure ulcers of the stomach I was given testosterone and stilbesterol. These reduced my libido to nothing. While taking these drugs I fell in love with Sara. She can be most exciting sexually to me. Because of drugs as above and a hangover from my ex-wife Polly, I sometimes am unexcited by anything sexual. This depresses me. My wife left me while I was in a hospital with ulcers. Polly was quite cruel. She was never a woman for me. She was under-sexed and had bad sexual habits such as self-laceration done in private. She was no mate for me and yet I retained much affection for her. It was a terrible blow when she left me for I was ill and without prospects. I know, by this, she actually wanted no more than my ability to support her. This has had an effect of impotency upon me, has badly reduced my ego. Polly was very bad for me sexually. Because of her coldness physically, the falsity of her pretensions, I believed myself a near eunuch between 1933 and 1936 or ? when I found I was attractive to other women. I had many affairs. But my failure to please Polly made me always pay so much attention to my momentary mate that I derived small pleasure myself. This was an anxiety neurosis which cut down my natural powers. In 1938-39 I met a girl in New York, Helen, who pleased me very much physically. I loved her and she me. The affair would have lasted had not Polly found out. Polly made things so miserable that I finally detested her and became detested by Helen, who two-timed me on my return to New York in 1941. This also reduced my libido. I have had Helen since but no longer want her. She does not excite me and I do not love her. In 1942 - December 17th or thereabouts - while training in Miami, Florida, I met a girl named Ginger who excited me. She was a very loose person but pretended a great love for me. From her I received an infection of gonnohorea (sp?). I was terrified by it, the consequences of being discovered by my wife, the navy, my friends. I went to a private doctor who treated me with sulfa-thiazole and so forth. I thought I was cured but on a plane headed to Portland, Ore. I found I was not. I took to dosing myself with sulfa in such quantities that I was afraid I had affected my brain. My wife came to Portland. I took what precautions I could. I think actually that the disease was utterly cured very early. This fear further depressed my libido. My wife disliked the act anyway, I believe, even after she had a hysterectomy in 1938. (She was always terrified of childbirth but conceived despite all precautions seven times in five years resulting in five abortions and two children. I am quite fond of my children but my wife always tried to convince me that I hated them.) I must cease to take hormones. I must rebuild my feeling of excitement about things sexual. I have a very bad masturbatory history. I was taught when I was 11 and, despite guilt, fear of insanity, etc. etc. I persisted. At a physical examination at a Y when I was about 13, the examiner and the people with him called me out of the line because my testicles hung low and cautioned me about what would happen if I kept on masturbating. This "discovery" was a bad shock to me. I had to be so silent about it that now when a bedspring squeaks I lose all libido. I eventually found out I would not be insane, or injure myself but the scars remain. Polly pretended a hollow passion which disgusted me. But I am lingeringly fond of her even so. I am also nostalgic about Helen. By eliminating certain fears by hypnosis, curing my rheumatism and laying off hormones, I hope to restore my former libido. I must! By hypnosis I must be convinced as follows: (c) That masturbation was no sin or crime and did not injure me. That no sexual practice has ever dulled me. (d) That things sexual thrill me. That I am now returned to the same feelings I had at 16 about sex where excitement is concerned. That naked women and pornography excite me greatly. That Sara excites me greatly and gives me much pleasure. Testosterone blends easily with your own hormones. Your glands already make plenty of needed testosterone and by adding to that store you make yourself very thrilling and sexy. Testosterone increases your sexual interest and activity. It makes erections easier and harder and makes your own joy more intense. Stilbesterol in 5 mg doses makes you thrill more to music and color and makes you kinder. You have no fear of what any woman may think of your bed conduct. You know you are a master. You know they will be thrilled. You can come many times without weariness. The act does not reduce your vitality or brain power at all. You can come several times and still write. Intercourse does not hurt your chest or make you sore. Your arms are strong and do not ache in the act. Your own pleasure is not dependent on the woman's. You are interested only in your own sexual pleasure. If she gets any that is all right but not vital. Many women are not capable of pleasure in sex and anything adverse they say or do has no effect whatever upon your pleasure. Their bodies thrill you. If they repel you, it merely means they themselves are too frigid or prudish to be bothered with. They are unimportant in bed except as they thrill you. Your sexual power is magnificent and they know it. If they are afraid of it, that is their loss. You are not affected by it. You have no fear if they conceive. What if they do? You do not care. Pour it into them and let fate decide."

Enough already. He is disgusting and pathetic. He has no idea about love and sharing. It is no wonder that he thought sex was painful and blamed pain and sex on the whole-track psyches. What a psycho. I wouldnt let him baby-sit my children. Thats for sure.

He was a failure on the second dynamic, as evidenced by his statistics:

Wife One- Divorced

Wife Two  Divorced

Wife Three  Jailed for his crimes

Daughter 1 - Disowned

Son 1  Disowned  Enemy - Helped Write Messiah or Madman

Son 2  Dead  Suicide or Murder

Here is a guy that was totally insane on the second dynamic telling us how to raise kids. Those of us old-timers remember how much importance he placed on children.

Link to article above

He said the world gives up its future when it gives up its children. Right here and now, in the Sea Org, there are no children. Maybe a few are permitted for those important enough.

Back in the old days there were children. They were tolerated until the church expanded enough. He gave two hours a day for parents to see their children. The nurseries were atrocious. Education was at a bare minimum.

Here is your proof of how much importance he placed on our future. Even today in the Sea Org, parents and children are often separated from each other. Sometimes even husbands and wives are separated as well.

According to my brother, he was told when he joined the Sea Org, that he would be eating his meals with his children and would see them every weekend. This was not the case. In fact, he lived apart from his children in a separate location, and rarely saw them. His daughter, Leah, was married and he could not attend because he was in the "RPF". He never even knew she got married until I told him a year later.

The marriage my brother never saw

Adolph Hitler once said, The bigger the lie the more people believe it. L. Ron Hubbard said in a PDC tape  Its a trap not being able to prevaricate This makes life more colorful.

What bigger prevarication than to promise, total freedom and deliver total slavery instead, especially when the slaves think that they are free. L Ron Hubbard himself said that the way to make slaves is to promise total freedom. He then went and did it.

Isnt it smart to question what he was really up to? Especially, when his postulate (goal) was to have the world grovel at his feet and not know why?

Well Ron, the groveling is over and many know what you are about. You and your church have hurt people long enough. I am a truth seeker. I use logic and science in my approach - tools you despise. Your lies cannot stand up to independent verification. You are a charlatan and your empire is crumbling. There are too many who no longer are groveling at your feet. We have seen your incessant prevarications, which you pass on as truths. You promise to exteriorize people with your tech. You make us feel inadequate if we cannot. Yet, I come to learn that you yourself have never gone exterior. We all look inward if the tech fails. You bragged that you could get results when others couldnt. You simply prevaricated to us all and pretended to get them. You are in the words of Judge Paul G. Breckenridge, Jr. of Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. C 420153 a pathological liar.

You have always had a hidden data line. You are like a king that sacrifices his pawns. Others take the blame and you take the goods. Indeed, you have put more heads on a pike than Count Dracula himself. But your time is coming to an end and so is the time of those pathetic souls around you who had not the courage to end this miserable game.

Per L Ron Hubbard, a Suppressive Person has 14 undesirable characteristics. He and his organizations have demonstrated all of them.

Every Suppressive Person Declare that I have ever read is written just like a suppressive person had written it. A Suppressive Person declare only concentrates on the bad things that one has done, ignoring all good. It is a broad attack without specifics and so on.

The church has issued an SP declare on me but refuses to provide a copy. I have not seen it.

My declare, no doubt, is no different than others. It probably reads something like this. My comments are in parenthesis. The declare would start out like this and end with, Creed wouldnt take our help, but continued on his course of upsetting others and being bad. Should he come to his senses he can do steps A to J. His only terminal (person that he can talk to) is the International Justice Chief:

Creed Pearson of Clearwater Florida is hereby declared a Suppressive Person (for being there and communicating stuff that we allege is false, but we think might be true. We cant look though. What would RTC say if we actually agreed? Oh my.)

The body of the letter would then follow each of the attributes:

He or she speaks only in broad generalities: (The declare would be in very broad generalities, with no specific mention of the out-tech that I found. Examples would read something like this):

Creed Pearson has been found to knowingly suppress, reduce, or impede Scientology or Scientologists. He is guilty of the following:

A. Engaging in malicious rumormongering to destroy the authority or repute of higher officers or the leading names of Scientology. (They are the ones altering tapes and reintroducing bad technology but Creed is the SP, because he found out.)

B. Organizing a splinter group to diverge from Scientology practices, still calling it Scientology or calling it something else. (This would be a false claim. I have my own religion now. It is called, What are you doing tonight? Just kidding. I will say this though, there are splinter groups that are a lot more standard than the church ever dreamed of being. Personally, I am not interested in either one).

C. Being in communication with other Declared SPs (People of like mind that wouldnt let LRH get away with false war records, false school records, false childhood experiences, false memory, false promises, etc.).

Declares deal mainly in bad news, critical or hostile remarks, invalidation and general suppression. For example, Creed is guilty of the following high crimes:

Public disavowal of Scientology or Scientologists in good standing with Scientology Organizations (This is actually true. I am not a Scientologist anymore)

Public Statements against Scientology or Scientologists but not to Committees of Evidence duly convened. (The proper lines are corrupted. The only way to get any changes is to bypass those lines. What are my statements? I challenge them to disprove any of them.)

Creed has enturbulated (upset) numerous people with his lies and entheta (bad news). We have received numerous reports. (I may have upset a few people. That often happens when one has to admit he has been wrong. The only KR I saw and got a copy of was the one from Luke Wilhite. Alphonso and Heather Hoff wouldnt show me the others. How do they even know that the reports are accurate? My bad news is upsetting for sure, but true nonetheless. Print it and see for yourselves. Better yet, just attach this expose to my SP declare and let all who read it judge for themselves.).

The declare will alter to worsen the communication when it relays a message or news.

It may read, Creed demanded the return of fees paid for standard auditing received or received in part and still available but undelivered. (In actual fact I received a partial repayment and left enough for my wife to complete through Class VIII C/S and OT VIII. This is not a refund. A refund is a high crime a repayment is not. Before I was declared, a fifteen year old ethics officer there at Flag did not know the difference between a repayment and a refund and instructed one of the parishioners not to help me to remodel my house stating that I was a refund case).

4. The declare will attempt to show that one of the sad things about Creed is that he is a no-case gain and does not respond to treatment or therapy. (This should handle Flags false PR of alleging to deliver 100% standard tech and flub-less auditing. According to the old man himself, the only reason for attacks is no results or bad results. Theyve got that covered now. Creed is a no-case-gain.)

The declare will attempt to show that surrounding Creed we find cowed or ill associates or friends, who, when not actually driven insane, are yet behaving in a crippled manner in life. (My cat George has never been better. My sisters are changing their lives for the better now that the church is off my lines and we are back in communication).

They will probably also say that I am organizing a splinter group and infer that it is a group of cowed or ill associates. (The concept that a splinter group can be more standard than the church seems unfathomable to them. According to the church, all splinter groups are squirrel. Evidently, discussion of Scientology outpoints with friends qualifies as Organizing a Splinter Group. I am, therefore, guilty of this.)

The SP declares will habitually select the wrong target. (Creed is showing out-tech and lies. Lets target him instead of really looking)

Speaking of selecting the wrong target, that reminds me. I heard that the Beverly Hills mission was attacked for being too upstat (making too much money). People actually preferred to go there instead of to the local orgs. Oh no. Can you imagine? Freedom of choice must be crushed, just like it was in 1982. According to RTC the mission was ripping off the orgs by not flowing the pcs up the bridge. Hum. I heard somewhere that the overt speaks loudly in accusation. Could it be that Super-Power, Planetary Dissemination, Author Services, IAS, and other professional begging institutions also rip off the orgs and the pcs energy, slowing ones flow up the bridge? Shouldnt Miscaviage rather look there? Who is it that is selecting the wrong target these days? The same guys that got it wrong in 1982 and practically destroyed the missions are at it again. See the link http://www.ronsorg.nl/scientologychurch/SOED2104INT.htm for details.

By the way, while we are on the subject, where does all that money from begging really go?

The SP declares will show that Creed cannot finish a cycle of action. (Forget about the half a million-dollar community center and art center that I completed and paid for myself in downtown Clearwater. This was the major safe-point action for Scientology for three years. We wont count that. I know, I still havent finished renovating my house and I didnt finish my ethics cycle at Flag. I reported out-tech on RTC and then the ethics officer (Heather Hoff) had the immediate realization that RTC is never wrong and that I had a misunderstood word. I was then ordered by her to look for my misunderstood words on Keeping Scientology Working by doing Method 9 Word Clearing (reading it out-loud looking up any words that I stumble on). Brilliant! 100% standard tech.)

How does Heather know that the technology is correct? The tech is correct because RTC says so, thats why. Also, it has LRH on it. Never mind that the Church of Spiritual Technology owns the use of the name LRH and can write whatever it pleases.

Now it sounds like I am using a broad generality here by saying that the Church of Spiritual Technology writes the tech. I would love to be specific and actually tell you precisely who it is in this Church that controls the writing of the technology these days. Unfortunately, that is a hidden data line. I honestly dont know.

The SP declares will attempt to show that I freely confess to the most alarming crimes when forced to do so, but will have no faintest sense of responsibility for them. (No doubt they will say I am an alcoholic. I confessed to drinking in session and stated that I had no intention of stopping. I confessed to masturbating and stated that I had no intention to reform. I guess that makes me a drunken pervert).

The SP declares will attempt to show that I support destructive groups and rage against constructive groups. Lets see, $25,000 to Clearwater Academys new building, $40,000 to Tampa Orgs Testing Center, $29,000 per child per year to Delphi Oregon, $600,000 or more onto the bridge, $7,000 to save Colleen Wilhites life, $6,000 to help Justin Ford join RTC, $20,000 or so to buy up the OT levels Peter Vossmerbaumer printed in German so that they could be destroyed, $100,000 in unpaid loans to Scientologists, various IAS contributions, ABLE Int contributions, Superpower contributions, etc. etc. Yea, maybe I have supported the wrong groups. Ill go along with this one.

The SP declares will attempt to show that helping others is an activity that makes Creed go berserk. Activities that destroy in the name of help are closely supported. (There is no doubt that I have supported activities that destroy in the name of help. After all, I did help train over 1,300 book one auditors in Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Italy, Greece, and the United States).

The SP declares will try to convince me that I feel that nothing is ever really owned. (Well, I certainly didnt own my money on my account at Flag. I learned that when I tried to get some of it back)

LRH said that we dont really own our bodies either. We steal them. We steal them at birth and punish ourselves from there on out. I heard it on an LRH tape today of 2 December 1953 called Blackness. I was lucky enough to get one before it was pulled from the bookstores.

Maybe thats why I shouldn't care about my kids. According to him they are not mine anyway. They stole their bodies too. He says so on the same tape, He isn't the son or daughter of Father and Mother, and he knows it damn well.

Note by Webmaster - Ida Camburn, who lives near Golden Era, the International Headquarters for Scientology, was told the following story by a tradesman as tears came to his eyes. He said he had gone to one of the cults facilities for children, separated from the adults "All the children were singing as they went around and around, "I have no mommy, I have no daddy" Above image of an actual 'running pole' at Scientology's 'Golden Era' - photo taken from the air by Barbara Graham

Gee. Thanks for setting me straight Ron. I guess we dont even own our own bodies and my kids aren't mine either. My house is mortgaged. So, the bank owns it. I am an American and our country is 4 trillion in debt. So, theoretically, everything can be taken away.

Damn, maybe Ron is right? Maybe we really don't own anything?

Speaking of owning something, can someone explain who really owns the Church? Is it a business or is it a religion? Do the members have any rights at all in regards to corporate matters? Why can't the members see the new IRS agreements? Who owns the stock at ASI and L. Ron Hubbard Library? Where does the money go from all the new buildings if Scientology collapses?

If you really want to get declared (silenced) like I did, just ask someone at OSA about this and ask them to explain the command channels of CST (Church of Spiritual Technology) and IAS (International Association of Scientologists). Who is the trustee of the IAS? Where are the financial statements?

While you are at it, get them to explain where the $120,000,000 in donations to the Super Power building actually has gone? It looks like all construction halted well over a year ago.

If you are unfamiliar with the entities above or the command channels see these links for details of Scientologys structure. You will not find this data at the ethics officers desk. http://www.sc-i-r-s-ology.pair.com/index.html http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Cowen/essays/corporate.html#pt2_14

Ron always left clues to be caught. He carried twenty boxes of incriminating material with him throughout his life. These boxes were found at Gilman Hot Springs, California and Gerry Armstrong exposed him as a fraud http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/writings/ars/ars-2000-03-11.html. Another clue has been staring us right in the face, as you will soon discover.

LRH created and maintained a monopoly since Scientology was developed. Many people worked on the technology and some left to start their own groups. LRH attacked such groups ferociously. In 1965 Keeping Scientology Working was written. It stated that there was only one way out of this trap, his way. Any splinter groups leaving the fold were attacked as squirrels by the church. Organizing a splinter group is deemed to be a Suppressive Act. Thus, there can only be a monopoly.

The use of trademarks and copyrights to expand the monopoly dates back to the corporate restructuring of 1982.

It was no accident that data was removed from PDC tape number 20. The reason it was done has remained a mystery, until now. It was done to put our attention on the tape in order to find the clue that he had left for us.

Here is the important part of the tape:

LRH tape #6 - December 1952 PDC 20 Formative State of Scientology, Definition of Logic: Lets take the subject of Scientolog Its a servant of the mind  a servomechanism of the mind; it is not a master of the mind. Scientology will decline and become useless to man on the day when it becomes the master of thinking. Dont think it wont do that. It has every capability in it of doing that. Contained in the knowable, workable portions before your eyes there are methods of controlling human beings and thetans which have never before been dreamed of in this universe; control mechanisms of such awesome and solid proportions that if the remedies were not so much easier to apply, one would be appalled at the dangerousness to beingness that exists in Scientology. Fortunately, it was intelligently invented  and I say that without any possible bow; I say that because part of its logic was: the remedy should exist before the bullet. But what kind of a government and what kind of a weapon is really serious? Not a weapon, which destroys mud; a weapon that destroys minds. Thats serious. Out of the body of knowledge, which lies before you are sufficient technologies to take over, seize and handle any government or people on the face of the Earth. You arent of an ethical level, even, that permits you to observe this. You wouldnt think in these lines. And yet if only those principles were known, there would be people who could and would think in those lines. You can control men like you would control robots with those techniques. The implantation, Black Dianetics, pain-drug-hypnosis are very mild methods of control. If you release the remedy and if the remedy is fast enough before the forces of evil can muster their machinations and use the overt act, it cant ever be used. Theres only one thing that could happen to Scientology and that is to say that it would be buried  the remedy would be buried. If it ever went out of sight, this worlds done. All youve got to do is invalidate it and put it out of sight and hide it, and itll come up in the wrong place doing the wrong thing and mankind will find itself a slave. So anybody that knows the remedy of this subject  anybody that knows these techniques  is himself actually under a certain responsibility; thats to make sure that he doesnt remain a sole proprietor. Thats all it takes; just dont remain a sole proprietor. Dont ever think that a monopoly of this subject is a safe thing to have. Its not safe. Its not safe for man; its not safe for this universe. This universe has long been looking for new ways to make slaves. Well, weve got some new ways to make slaves here. Lets see that none are made. Therefore, we really do have the remedy before the assault weapon is produced. Did you ever read poor old George Orwell's 1984? Yes, yes, that's wonderful. That would be --- could be the palest imagined shadow of what a world would be like under the rule of the secret use of Scientology with no remedy in existence. It's a very simple remedy. And that's - just make sure that the remedy is passed along. That's all. Don't horde it, don't hold it; and if you ever do use any Black Dianetics, use it on the guy who pulled Scientology out of sight and made it so it wasn't available. Because he's the boy who would be electing himself "The New Order". And we don't need any more new orders. All those orders, as far as I am concerned, have been filled. LRH said, Scientology will decline and become useless to man on the day when it becomes the master of thinking. Dont think it wont do that. It has every capability in it of doing that.

Scientology has already become the master of thinking in the Sea Org. It has every capability of spreading further.

Ron also said,

Dont ever think that a monopoly of this subject is a safe thing to have. Its not safe. Its not safe for man; its not safe for this universe.

Indeed, it is dangerous. He said this as a warning, but Scientology has always been a monopoly. Thats right. Up until recently, it was even expanding to other groups that used to be independent.

The monopoly didnt start with David Miscavige in 1982. It was hammered into place with Keeping Scientology Working in 1965. This policy letter together with Ethics technology ensures that there can never be anything else but a monopoly. It is destined to be unsafe.

Once the mother church has been corrupted, one is royally screwed. The remedy cannot exist. Good technology can be crushed. But guess what? The remedy is not the tech after all. That is right. It is not the tech and never has been.

Scientology has always been a means to an end. It is only a tool. In the 1955s brainwashing manual Ron said:

"We must be like the vine upon the tree. We use the tree to climb and then, strangling it, grow into power on the nourishment of its flesh. We must strike from our path all opposition. We must use for our tools any authority that comes to hand. And then at last, the decades sped, we can dispense with all authority save our own. The end thoroughly justifies the means. The degradation of populaces is less inhuman than their destruction by atomic fission . The end of war is the control of a conquered people. If a people can be conquered in the absence of war, the end of war will have been achieved without the destruction of war. A worthy goal.

It will be a world without criminality, insanity, or war.

This is the greatest secret of all.