Google's first Pixel phones, released in 2016, were surprise stunners in the camera department. A year on, Google has doubled down on its desire to take great photos by introducing super-advanced post-processing techniques — oh, and it upgraded the hardware at the same time. Yes the Pixel 2 (and 2 XL) has a great camera. That much was shown in our Pixel 2 review and all over social media the week it launched. But how much better is it than last year's Pixel, which up until a few weeks prior to the Pixel 2's launch was still considered one of the best cameras available? We've taken both the Pixel and Pixel 2 cameras out for a spin in different situations to get a feel for how they compare head-to-head today. Verizon is offering the Pixel 4a for just $10/mo on new Unlimited lines Daylight

As you can easily see, both of these phones take excellent photos in relatively good lighting conditions. What I didn't necessarily expect is to have the results be so close together — a year on, the 2016 Pixel really holds its own. There isn't anything the Pixel 2 does worse than its predecessor, and everything it does better is very subtle. The new phone has all of the same characteristics as its predecessor, with some fine tuning for even better photos. Color representation is still relatively accurate with a little bit of extra kick, and the Pixel 2 seems to bring out a little more saturation in the colors, and just a bit more light out of scenes that needed HDR to brighten dark areas — this leads to challenging scenes being captured more consistently across the photo as a whole. When you zoom in on the photos you notice the Pixel 2 is much better with sharp edges and fine detail in textures, without over-processing and creating more issues — though it's wroth noting this really is only noticeable when you start to finely scrutinize things. One other interesting thing to note is that the Pixel 2 has completely eliminated the exaggerated lens flare "issue" that was pointed out on the original Pixels. You now get typical light artifacts and banding when shooting directly toward a bright light, rather than the bothersome purple rings and halos the original Pixels often produced. Being that Portrait Mode is exclusive to the Pixel 2, it isn't part of this comparison directly. But it is worth mentioning that it's a neat feature to have on the newer phone and it works surprisingly well. It just isn't such a big deal that it'd make an upgrade from last year's Pixel to the new Pixel 2 worth it. Low light

At a glance, things are once again in a dead heat between these two when taking low-light photos. Viewing photos side by side at typical sizes you'd be hard pressed to pick which one came from which phone, and that's a great sign for the original Pixel. The new Pixel 2 tends to take slightly cooler photos, and getting the white balance a bit better seemed to help with color reproduction in some scenes. This wasn't the case universally, though. Both phones take near-identical low light shots, but the Pixel 2 offers better colors and fine detail in dark areas. Once again when you start to zoom in you'll find where the Pixel 2 has made improvements in fine detail and lines. You get far more detail in textures in dark areas, whereas on the original Pixel things would kind of be blotched together and smoothed out. The same goes for detail in areas with high ISO grain, where the Pixel 2 does a better job defining sharp lines and detail even though it keeps a very similar amount of grain. The OIS, wider aperture, and overall faster capture time on the Pixel 2 all add up to a more consistent shooting experience in low-light situations, but as you can see from the samples above, the end result isn't much ahead of the 2016 Pixel. That's not a knock on the Pixel 2, honestly — last year's phone was just that fantastic in low-light photography. Bottom line