tungfa said: TREZOR is 100% user friendly - incl newcomers

u can NOT find an easier to use wallet ! Click to expand...

tungfa said: Services like masternode.me, Node40 .... have nothing to do with wallets Click to expand...

tungfa said: "Dash Copay on an almost always offline machine would be perfect"

so u suggest we implement MN's there

BUT only

with the option of using it ONLY on a almost always offline machine ? Click to expand...

AndyDark said: no that's not really the case that we want non-technical masternode operators directly - if they're non technical they should employ someone to do it for them. Click to expand...

We are talking about user a Trezor for storing the MN colatoral, entering MN configuration and 1 or 2 MN commands/operations as required by services like masternode.me. If you think that is 100% user friendly - including newcomers, I think you would benefit from re-calibrating your standards for user friendliness.For the MN owner they do because even when using such services you need a wallet to store the MN collateral, enter MN configuration and 1 or 2 MN commands/operations as required by the services.Is that what we do for dash core? Because the people I am suggesting should be able to store the MN collateral, enter MN configuration and 1 or 2 MN commands/operations as required by the services, with copay on an almost always offline machine are currently doing that with dash core, not using Trezor.IMHO it would be more secure with dash-copay than dah core because copay is easier to backup and restore backups, does not need to be re-backed up, is easier to use and harder to make mistakes with. Perhaps my objectives would be better achieved by making dash core HD and easier to use but I don't suppose that will happen.Yeh they do, like masternode.me node40 and Splawiks. They still need a user friendly wallet to store the MN collateral, enter MN configuration and 1 or 2 MN commands/operations as required by services.What I am hearing is that we are not interested in helping non-technical people own masternodes. This will be bad for diversity and decentralisation of the MNs.