Good day and welcome to the review of our bots vs experts’ article. These review(s) will help us determine if the bots options are preferable to the experts or if human judgement trumps their call. It will also help us keep track of the performance of these sites over the course of the season.





for cross checking. Thanks. The previewing article can be found here for cross checking. Thanks.













FFFIRST had returns for 2/3 of their goalkeeper picks, 3/5 of their defence picks, 3/7 of their midfield picks and 2/5 of their forward picks with a captain success giving an average 10/20 or 50% correlation rate. had returns for 2/3 of their goalkeeper picks, 3/5 of their defence picks, 3/7 of their midfield picks and 2/5 of their forward picks with a captain success giving an average 10/20 or 50% correlation rate.





FFFIX came in with 2/3 on the goal keepers, 4/5 on defenders, 3/7 on midfielders and 2/5 on forwards to give a marginally better 11/20 or 55% correlation rate. came in with 2/3 on the goal keepers, 4/5 on defenders, 3/7 on midfielders and 2/5 on forwards to give a marginally better 11/20 or 55% correlation rate.





OVERLORD picked 2/3 on keepers, 4/5 on defenders, 1/7 on midfielders and 3/5 on forwards at 10/20 or 50% correlation. picked 2/3 on keepers, 4/5 on defenders, 1/7 on midfielders and 3/5 on forwards at 10/20 or 50% correlation.





FFASSIST had a 2/3 on goalkeepers, 4/5 on defenders, 1/5 on midfielders and 1/3 on forwards to join in with 8/16 or 50% correlation. had a 2/3 on goalkeepers, 4/5 on defenders, 1/5 on midfielders and 1/3 on forwards to join in with 8/16 or 50% correlation.





BOTS TEAM gave a 2/3 on goal keepers, 4/5 on defenders, 2/7 on midfielders and a 2/5 on forwards to give the highest score of 10/20 or 50% correlation. Mixing the trio, the modalgave a 2/3 on goal keepers, 4/5 on defenders, 2/7 on midfielders and a 2/5 on forwards to give the highest score of 10/20 or 50% correlation.





FFFIX got passed an average 50% score. With like for like selections by the bots, onlygot passed an average 50% score.





TheFpl had 1/1 for goalie, 2/3 in defense, 0/4 in midfield, and 1/3 in attack for a poor 4/11 or 36% correlation. For the experts,had 1/1 for goalie, 2/3 in defense, 0/4 in midfield, and 1/3 in attack for a poor 4/11 or 36% correlation.





OFFICIALFPL scouts had 0/1 in goal, 3/3 in defense, 2/4 from midfielders and 2/3 from forwards for a 7/11 or 63% pass. Thescouts had 0/1 in goal, 3/3 in defense, 2/4 from midfielders and 2/3 from forwards for a 7/11 or 63% pass.





FFSCOUT turned in 0/1 with their goalkeeper slot, 3/3 with their defence slot, 2/4 with the midfield slot and 1/3 with the forwards giving an above average 6/11 or 54% correlation rate. turned in 0/1 with their goalkeeper slot, 3/3 with their defence slot, 2/4 with the midfield slot and 1/3 with the forwards giving an above average 6/11 or 54% correlation rate.





ACADEMY had 1/1 in goal, 2/2 in defense, 2/5 in midfield and 2/3 in attack for 7/11 or 63% success. Remember that they gave us an AOA team this week. Finally, thehad 1/1 in goal, 2/2 in defense, 2/5 in midfield and 2/3 in attack for 7/11 or 63% success. Remember that they gave us an AOA team this week.





EXPERTS TEAM had 0/1 in goal, 3/3 for defenders, ¼ in midfield and 2/3 in attack for 6/11 or 54% correlation. The modalhad 0/1 in goal, 3/3 for defenders, ¼ in midfield and 2/3 in attack for 6/11 or 54% correlation.





FINAL TEAM had a 0/1 on goalkeeper, 3/3 in defence, 1/4 in midfield and 2/3 with the forward picks to give 6/11 or 54% correlation. Thehad a 0/1 on goalkeeper, 3/3 in defence, 1/4 in midfield and 2/3 with the forward picks to give 6/11 or 54% correlation.





From the data, the experts were the winners this week though both were poor with most midfield picks not performing.





gameweek score of 82 which is 26 points more than the average score after a captain success with BENTEKE. The final team had aafter a captain success with



