Anderson, J., Lin, H.-S., Treagust, D., Ross, S., & Yore, L. (2007). Using large-scale assessment datasets for research in science and mathematics education: programme for international student assessment (PISA). International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(4), 591–614. doi:10.1007/s10763-007-9090-y.

Baenninger, M., & Newcombe, N. S. (1989). The role of experience in spatial test performance: a meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 20(5), 327–344. doi:10.1007/BF00287729.

Baker, D. P., & Jones, D. P. (1993). Creating gender equality: cross-national gender stratification and mathematical performance. Sociology of Education, 66(2), 91–103. doi:10.2307/2112795.

Barnes, G., McInerney, D. M., & Marsh, H. W. (2005). Exploring sex differences in science enrolment intentions: an application of the general model of academic choice. The Australian Educational Researcher, 32(2), 1–23. doi:10.1007/BF03216817.

Beilock, S. L., Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., & Levine, S. C. (2010). Female teachers’ math anxiety affects girls’ math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(5), 1860–1863. doi:10.1073/pnas.0910967107.

Benbow, C. P. (1988). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability in intellectually talented preadolescents: their nature, effects, and possible causes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11(2), 169–232. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00049670.

Benbow, C. P., Lubinski, D., Shea, D. L., & Eftekhari-Sanjani, H. (2000). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability at age 13: their status 20 years later. Psychological Science, 11(6), 474–480. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00291.

Bernstein, B., Jacobson, R., & Russo, N. F. (2010). Mentoring women in science, technology, engineering and mathematics fields. In F. Denmark, M. E. Reuder, & A. M. Austria (Eds.), A handbook for women mentors: transcending barriers of stereotype, race, and ethnicity (pp. 43–64). Westport, CT: Prager.

Bhanot, R. T., & Jovanovic, J. (2009). The links between parent behaviors and boys’ and girls’ science achievement beliefs. Applied Developmental Science, 13(1), 42–59. doi:10.1080/10888690802606784.

Borenstein, M., & Rothstein, H. R. (1999). Comprehensive meta-analysis: a computer program for research synthesis. Englewood, NJ: BioStat.

Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. West Sussex: Wiley.

Buckley, S. (2016). Gender and sex differences in student participation, achievement and engagement in mathematics. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.

Burkam, D. T., Lee, V. E., & Smerdon, B. A. (1997). Gender and science learning early in high school: subject matter and laboratory experiences. American Educational Research Journal, 34(2), 297–331. doi:10.3102/00028312034002297.

Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2011). Understanding current causes of women’s underrepresentation in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(8), 3157–3162. doi:10.1073/pnas.1014871108.

Charles, M., & Bradley, K. (2009). Indulging our gendered selves? Sex segregation by field of study in 44 countries. American Journal of Sociology, 114(4), 924–976. doi:10.1086/595942.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the Behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

Crowley, K., Callanan, M. A., Tenenbaum, H. R., & Allen, E. (2001). Parents explain more often to boys than to girls during shared scientific thinking. Psychological Science, 12(3), 258–261. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00347.

Dwyer, C. A., & Johnson, L. (1997). Grades, accomplishments, and correlates. In W. Willingham & N. S. Cole (Eds.), Gender and fair assessment (pp. 127–156). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: a current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associatiates.

Eccles, J. S. (1987). Gender roles and women’s achievement-related decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11(2), 135–172. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1987.tb00781.x.

Eccles, J. S. (1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18(4), 585–609. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb01049.x.

Eccles, J. S. (2007). Where are all the women? Gender differences in participation in physical science and engineering. In S. J. Ceci (Ed.), Why aren’t more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 199–210). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

Eccles, J. S. (2013). Gender and achievement choices. In E. T. Gershoff, R. S. Mistry, & D. Crosby (Eds.), Societal contexts of child development: pathways of influence and implications for practice and policy (pp. 19–34). New York: Oxford University Press.

Else-Quest, N. M., & Grabe, S. (2012). The political is personal: Measurement and application of nation-level indicators of gender equity in psychological research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36(2), 131–144. doi:10.1177/0361684312441592.

Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (2010). Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(1), 103–127. doi:10.1037/a0018053.

Else-Quest, N. M., Mineo, C. C., & Higgins, A. (2013). Math and science attitudes and achievement at the intersection of gender and ethnicity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(3), 293–309. doi:10.1177/0361684313480694.

Feingold, A. (1992). Sex differences in variability in intellectual abilities: a new look at an old controversy. Review of Educational Research, 62(1), 61–84. doi:10.3102/00346543062001061.

Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in variability in intellectual abilities: a cross-cultural perspective. Sex Roles, 30(1), 81–92. doi:10.1007/BF01420741.

Feniger, Y. (2011). The gender gap in advanced math and science course taking: does same-sex education make a difference? Sex Roles, 65(9), 670–679. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9851-x.

Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., Carpenter, T. P., & Lubinski, C. A. (1990). Teachers’ attributions and beliefs about girls, boys, and mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21(1), 55–69. doi:10.1007/BF00311015.

Frome, P. M., & Eccles, J. S. (1998). Parents’ influence on children’s achievement-related perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), 435–452. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.435.

Gallagher, A. M., & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.). (2005). Gender differences in mathematics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Geary, D. C. (2010). Male, female: the evolution of human sex differences (2nd ed.). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

Goldman, A. D., & Penner, A. M. (2014). Exploring international gender differences in mathematics self-concept. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 1–16, doi:10.1080/02673843.2013.847850.

Guiso, L., Monte, F., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2008). Culture, gender, and math. Science, 320(5880), 1164–1165. doi:10.1126/science.1154094.

Gunderson, E., Ramirez, G., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. (2012). The role of parents and teachers in the development of gender-related math attitudes. Sex Roles, 66(3), 153–166. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9996-2.

Halim, M. L., & Ruble, D. N. (2010). Gender identity and stereotyping in early and middle childhood. In J. C. Chrisler & D. R. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology (pp. 495–525). New York: Springer.

Halpern, D. F., Aronson, J., Reimer, N., Simpkins, S., Star, J. R., & Wentzel, K. (2007a). Encouraging girls in math and science. Washington DC: National Center for Education Research, U.S. Department of Education.

Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C. P., Geary, D. C., Gur, R. C., Hyde, J. S., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2007b). The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8(1), 1–51. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2007.00032.x.

Handelsman, J., Cantor, N., Carnes, M., Denton, D., Fine, E., Grosz, B., et al. (2005). More women in science. Science, 309(5738), 1190–1191. doi:10.1126/science.1113252.

Hausmann, R., Tyson, L. D., & Zahidi, S. (2011). The global gender gap report 2011. Geneva: World Economic Forum.

Haworth, C. M. A., Dale, P. S., & Plomin, R. (2010). Sex differences in school science performance from middle childhood to early adolescence. International Journal of Educational Research, 49(2–3), 92–101. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2010.09.003.

Hedges, L. V. (2008). What are effect sizes and why do we need them? Child Development Perspectives, 2(3), 167–171. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00060.x.

Hedges, L. V., & Nowell, A. (1995). Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science, 269(5220), 41–45. doi:10.1126/science.7604277.

Huang, C. (2013). Gender differences in academic self-efficacy: a meta-analysis. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(1), 1–35. doi:10.1007/s10212-011-0097-y.

Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2000). Fixed effects vs. random effects meta-analysis models: implications for cumulative research knowledge. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8(4), 275–292. doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00156.

Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581–592. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581.

Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (2006). Gender similarities in mathematics and science. Science, 314(5799), 599–600. doi:10.1126/science.1132154.

Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., Ryan, M., Frost, L. A., & Hopp, C. (1990). Gender comparisons of mathematics attitudes and affect. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14(3), 299–324. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1990.tb00022.x.

Hyde, J. S., Lindberg, S. M., Linn, M. C., Ellis, A. B., & Williams, C. C. (2008). Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science, 321(5888), 494–495. doi:10.1126/science.1160364.

Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, S., Osgood, D. W., Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children’s self-competence and values: gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 73(2), 509–527. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00421.

Jodl, K. M., Michael, A., Malanchuk, O., Eccles, J. S., & Sameroff, A. (2001). Parents’ roles in shaping early adolescents’ occupational aspirations. Child Development, 72(4), 1247–1266. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00345.

Kane, J. M., & Mertz, J. E. (2012). Debunking myths about gender and mathematics performance. Notices of the AMS, 59(1), 10–21. doi:10.1090/noti790.

Kenney-Benson, G. A., Pomerantz, E. M., Ryan, A. M., & Patrick, H. (2006). Sex differences in math performance: the role of children’s approach to schoolwork. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 11–26. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.11.

Kimura, D. (2000). Sex and cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Kimura, D. (2002). Sex hormones influence human cognitive pattern. Neuroendocrinology Letters, 23, 67–77.

Kost-Smith, L. E., Pollock, S. J., Finkelstein, N. D., Cohen, G. L., Ito, T. A., Miyake, A., et al. (2012). Replicating a self-affirmation intervention to address gender differences: successes and challenges. In AIP Conference Proceedings-American Institute of Physics (Vol. 1413, pp. 231, Vol. 1).

Lauer, S., Momsen, J., Offerdahl, E., Kryjevskaia, M., Christensen, W., & Montplaisir, L. (2013). Stereotyped: investigating gender in introductory science courses. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 12(1), 30–38. doi:10.1187/cbe.12-08-0133.

Leibham, M. B., Alexander, J. M., & Johnson, K. E. (2013). Science interests in preschool boys and girls: relations to later self-concept and science achievement. Science Education, 97(4), 574–593. doi:10.1002/sce.21066.

Liben, L. S., & Coyle, E. F. (2014). Developmental interventions to address the STEM gender gap: exploring intended and unintended consequences. In L. S. Liben & R. S. Bigler (Eds.), The role of gender in educational contexts and outcomes (Vol. 47, pp. 77–115, advances in child development and behavior). San Diego: Academic Press.

Linn, R. L. (2002). The measurement of student achievement in international studies. In A. C. Porter & A. Gamoran (Eds.), Methodological advances in cross-national surveys of educational achievement (pp. 27–57). Washingon: National Academy Press.

Lippa, R. A. (1998). Gender-related individual differences and the structure of vocational interests: the importance of the people–things dimension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(4), 996–1009. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.996.

Luzzo, D. A., Hasper, P., Albert, K. A., Bibby, M. A., & Martinelli Jr., E. A. (1999). Effects of self-efficacy-enhancing interventions on the math/science self-efficacy and career interests, goals, and actions of career undecided college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46(2), 233–243. doi:10.1037//0022-0167.46.2.233.

Lynch, J. (2002). Parents’ self-efficacy beliefs, parents’ gender, children’s reader self-perceptions, reading achievement and gender. Journal of Research in Reading, 25(1), 54–67. doi:10.1111/1467-9817.00158.

Lytton, H., & Romney, D. M. (1991). Parents’ differential socialization of boys and girls: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 267–296. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.267.

Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Machin, S., & Pekkarinen, T. (2008). Global sex differences in test score variability. Science, 322(5906), 1331–1332. doi:10.1126/science.1162573.

Marginson, S., Tytler, R., Freeman, B., & Roberts, K. (2013). STEM country comparisons : international comparisons of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education. Melbourne: Australian Council of Learned Academies.

Martin, C. L., & Ruble, D. N. (2004). Children’s search for gender cues: cognitive perspectives on gender development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(2), 67–70. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00276.x.

Martin, M. O., & Mullis, I. V. S. (2012). Methods and procedures in TIMSS and PIRLS 2011. Chestnut Hill: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.

Miyake, A., Kost-Smith, L. E., Finkelstein, N. D., Pollock, S. J., Cohen, G. L., & Ito, T. A. (2010). Reducing the gender achievement gap in college science: a classroom study of values affirmation. Science, 330(6008), 1234–1237. doi:10.1126/science.1195996.

Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., & Gonzalez, E. J. (2000). TIMSS 1999: International Mathematics Report: Findings from IEA’s repeat of the Third International Mathematics and Science Study at the eighth grade: International Study Center.

National Science Foundation (2011). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2011. National Science Foundation, http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/pdf/wmpd2011.pdf

National Science Foundation (2017). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2017. National Science Foundation. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2017/nsf17310/

Neuschmidt, O., Barth, J., & Hastedt, D. (2008). Trends in gender differences in mathematics and science (TIMSS 1995–2003). Studies in Educational Evaluation, 34(2), 56–72. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2008.04.002.

Newcombe, N. S., & Frick, A. (2010). Early education for spatial intelligence: why, what, and how. Mind, Brain, and Education, 4(3), 102–111. doi:10.1111/j.1751-228X.2010.01089.x.

Newcombe, N. S., Ambady, N., Eccles, J. S., Gomez, L., Klahr, D., Linn, M., et al. (2009). Psychology’s role in mathematics and science education. American Psychologist, 64(6), 538–550. doi:10.1037/a0014813.

Nguyen, H.-H. D., & Ryan, A. M. (2008). Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1314–1334. doi:10.1037/a0012702.

Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Math= male, me= female, therefore math≠ me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 44–59. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.83.1.44.

Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Sriram, N., Lindner, N. M., Devos, T., Ayala, A., et al. (2009). National differences in gender–science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10593–10597. doi:10.1073/pnas.0809921106.

Nuttall, R. L., Casey, M. B., & Pezaris, E. (2005). Spatial ability as a mediator of gender differences on mathematics tests: a biological-environmental framework. In A. M. Gallagher & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Gender differences in mathematics: an integrative psychological approach (pp. 121–142). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

OECD (2011). Education at a Glance 2011: OECD Indicators. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/education-at-a-glance-2011_eag-2011-en

OECD (2014). Are boys and girls equally prepared for life? Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/PIF-2014-gender-international-version.pdf.

OECD (2016). PISA 2015 results—Excellence and Equity in Education. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Priess, H. A., & Hyde, J. S. (2010). Gender and academic abilities and preferences. In J. C. Chrisler & D. R. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology (pp. 297–316). New York: Springer.

Reilly, D. (2012). Gender, culture and sex-typed cognitive abilities. PloS One, 7(7), e39904. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0039904.

Reilly, D., Neumann, D. L., & Andrews, G. (2015). Sex differences in mathematics and science: a meta-analysis of National Assessment of Educational Progress assessments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 645–662. doi:10.1037/edu0000012.

Reilly, D., Neumann, D. L., & Andrews, G. (2017). Gender differences in spatial ability: implications for STEM education and approaches to reducing the gender gap for parents and educators. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Visual-spatial ability: transforming research into practice (pp. 195–224). Switzerland: Springer International.

Riegle-Crumb, C., Farkas, G., & Muller, C. (2006). The role of gender and friendship in advanced course taking. Sociology of Education, 79(3), 206–228. doi:10.1177/003804070607900302.

Riegle-Crumb, C., Moore, C., & Ramos-Wada, A. (2011). Who wants to have a career in science or math? Exploring adolescents’ future aspirations by gender and race/ethnicity. Science Education, 95(3), 458–476. doi:10.1002/sce.20431.

Rosenthal, R., & DiMatteo, M. R. (2001). Meta-analysis: recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 59–82. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.59.

Rozek, C. S., Hyde, J. S., Svoboda, R. C., Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2014). Gender differences in the effects of a utility-value intervention to help parents motivate adolescents in mathematics and science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 195–206. doi:10.1037/a0036981.

Sander, E., Endepohls-Ulpe, M., & Quaiser-Pohl, C. (2016). Adult education in science, technology, engineering and mathematics under the gender aspect—a critical overview of programs and strategies in Germany. In M. Maksimović, J. Ostrouch-Kamińska, K. Popović, & A. Bulajić (Eds.), Contemporary issues and perspectives on gender research in adult education (pp. 211–223). Belgrade: Institute for Pedagogy and Andragogy.

Shapiro, J., & Williams, A. M. (2012). The role of stereotype threats in undermining girls’ and women’s performance and interest in STEM fields. Sex Roles, 66(3–4), 175–183. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0051-0.

Shields, S. A. (1982). The variability hypothesis: the history of a biological model of sex differences in intelligence. Signs, 7(4), 769–797. doi:10.2307/3173639.

Simpkins, S. D., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2005). Parents’ socializing behavior and children’s participation in math, science, and computer out-of-school activities. Applied Developmental Science, 9(1), 14–30. doi:10.1207/s1532480xads0901_3.

Simpkins, S. D., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Math and science motivation: a longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 70–83. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.70.

Smeding, A. (2012). Women in science, technology, Engineering,and mathematics (STEM): an investigation of their implicit gender stereotypes and stereotypes’ connectedness to math performance. Sex Roles, 67(11–12), 617–629. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0209-4.

Spelke, E. S. (2005). Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for mathematics and science?: a critical review. American Psychologist, 60(9), 950–958. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.9.950.

Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(1), 4–28. doi:10.1006/jesp.1998.1373.

Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: how stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52(6), 613–629. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.6.613.

Stoeger, H., Duan, X., Schirner, S., Greindl, T., & Ziegler, A. (2013). The effectiveness of a one-year online mentoring program for girls in STEM. Computers & Education, 69, 408–418. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.032.

Su, R., Rounds, J., & Armstrong, P. I. (2009). Men and things, women and people: a meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. Psychological Bulletin, 135(6), 859–884. doi:10.1037/a0017364.

Sugimoto, C., Larivière, V., Ni, C., Gingras, Y., & Cronin, B. (2013). Global gender disparities in science. Nature, 504(7479), 211–213. doi:10.1038/504211a.

Thompson, S. G., & Higgins, J. (2002). How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? Statistics in Medicine, 21(11), 1559–1573. doi:10.1002/sim.1187.

UNESCO (2011). Fact Sheet: Women in Science (2011). UNESCO Institute for Statistics. http://www.uis.unesco.org/ScienceTechnology/Documents/fs14-women-science-2011-en.pdf

Unger, R. K. (1979). Towards a redefinition of sex and gender. American Psychologist, 34(11), 1085–1094. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.34.11.1085.

Uttal, D. H., Meadow, N. G., Tipton, E., Hand, L. L., Alden, A. R., Warren, C., et al. (2013a). The malleability of spatial skills: a meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 352–402. doi:10.1037/a0028446.

Uttal, D. H., Miller, D. I., & Newcombe, N. S. (2013b). Exploring and enhancing spatial thinking links to achievement in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(5), 367–373. doi:10.1177/0963721413484756.

Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 250–270. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.117.2.250.

Wai, J., Cacchio, M., Putallaz, M., & Makel, M. C. (2010). Sex differences in the right tail of cognitive abilities: a 30 year examination. Intelligence, 38(4), 412–423. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2010.04.006.

Walters, J. (2010). Recasting title IX: addressing gender equity in the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics professoriate. Review of Policy Research, 27(3), 317–332. doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.2010.00444.x.

Weinburgh, M. (1995). Gender differences in student attitudes toward science: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1970 to 1991. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(4), 387–398. doi:10.1002/tea.3660320407.

Wilkinson, L. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54(8), 594–604. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.8.594.