Imbarkus said: Okay Kotaku found 8 of them who were willing to anonymously attest to a lot of allegations about their ex-boss, and then slink away.



Dyack had 8 of them who were willing to stand with him in a new company and work with him again directing them creatively to make a new game.



The problem with technological representations of human opinions is the method of aggregation is all wrong. Like the Nielsen ratings, your evaluation of the testament of those 8 people gains more weight, total voice in fact, for everyone who worked there. Even the ones who claimed on video that the things said were not true.



Many favor only certain opinion aggregates when it comes to this man: Averages of Maximums (in Blame), is my closest estimation. Click to expand...

The only person claiming any of this is untrue is Denis himself, whose previous project also spiraled over budget and out of control many, many times; who tried to bring a lawsuit against Epic, destroying what was left of his company in the process by stealing Epic's property and lying about it; had a very public egotistical breakdown on this very site...even Blood Omen had its share of controversy behind it. The man has no track record, no credibility, and that is his own fault.I'm sure he had friends in SK; but again, why has literally nobody not working with him at the moment said anything in defense of what occurred there, whether his behavior or their own work? As an example, even people who didn't seem to get on great with Ken Levine have not tossed him under the bus in the face of the implosion of Irrational - why is this situation different?The only way he gets to repair his reputation as a quality game maker is to ship quality games, not argue about the sourced and investigated piece via a YouTube video or take a fluff piece interview with a third-rate site and an interviewer who clearly is beside himself to be acknowledged by anyone in the industry at all.