by Jason Hommel, updated, July 15th, 2019

Most of the articles/sources cited below were found in the top 20 searches at google within a day. The reasons they present as to why Global Warming is a fraud, are as follows:

Several U.S. states are trying to pass unconstitutional legislation that would make it a crime to speak out against man-caused global warming. The desire for censorship shows they lost the debate. CO2 is good for the earth and plants. CO2 levels are unusually historically very low right now. 31,487 American scientists say, “There is no man made global warming, and CO2 is good. Historic data over 94 years show no warming: U.S. Data Since 1895 [to 1989] Fail To Show Warming Trend By PHILIP SHABECOFF and SPECIAL TO THE NEW YORK TIMES JAN. 26, 1989 Satellite data over 40 years show no warming: What the graph shows is the departure from the average for the 30 years from 1981 to 2010. The last data point is February 2019 with a result of -0.03 degrees C. So we have had 40 years of global warming and the temperature has remained flat. Climategate 2009, 2011 show the global warming scientists lied about the “warming data”: ” “Three themes are emerging from the newly released emails: (1) prominent scientists central to the global warming debate are taking measures to conceal rather than disseminate underlying data and discussions; (2) these scientists view global warming as a political “cause” rather than a balanced scientific inquiry and (3) many of these scientists frankly admit to each other that much of the science is weak and dependent on deliberate manipulation of facts and data.” “ “If global warming and ocean levels rising up to 10 feet (the low estimate) were real, there would be warnings in all the real estate prospectuses for investors, and banks would not issue loans for Florida real estate, nor could you get a loan for property in London. It is therefore the greatest fraud ever in the history of the world!” “Asked if coastal cities such as Miami would be flooding due to sea-level rise caused by alleged man-made global warming, Mörner was unequivocal: “Absolutely not.” “There is no rapid sea-level rise going on today, and there will not be,” he said, citing observable data. The U.S. Government, as of 2014, spent $37.7 billion promoting the fraud of global warming, and trying to stop something that is not even happening. That’s why this is an important issue. That 97% of scientists agree that global warming is real is a fraudulent statement; it’s only 0.3%. ” Only 34 percent of the papers Cook examined expressed any opinion about anthropogenic climate change at all. Since 33 percent appeared to endorse anthropogenic climate change, he divided 33 by 34 and — voilà — 97 percent! When David Legates, a University of Delaware professor who formerly headed the university’s Center for Climatic Research, recreated Cook’s study, he found that “only 41 papers — 0.3 percent of all 11,944 abstracts or 1.0 percent of the 4,014 expressing an opinion, and not 97.1 percent” “

What stands out to me is that there never has been, and is no, serious debate as to whether global warming would be good for the planet, such as reducing the need for burning heating oil, or opening up more land in Canada and Russia for farming. And that it might help prevent the catastrophic ice age the earthers were warning about in 1977.

And there is no serious debate among “manmade increased CO2 alarmists” that more CO2 will be helping the earth to grow more plants, as it’s actually doing.

I found this study shocking, that the global warming data is held by a handful of scientists who have been caught lying about the data, and that both historical data, and modern sattelite data proves there is zero global warming.

I also find the oft repeated claim that 97% of scientists agree, and that there is a global consensus about global warming is just total fraud, that it was only 0.3% of scientists in papers looked at. What a monsterous fraud!

Finally, CO2 is only 4/100th’s of 1% of the Earth’s atmosphere. That’s 0.04%. Stated another way, 99.97% of the atmosphere contains zero CO2, and is “CO2 free”. In the precious metals market, 99.9% or 99.99% is as pure as gold and silver gets.

Here are a series of articles showing that global warming is fraud.

Trump Climate Panel Could Expose Huge Fraud, Hence the Hysteria Friday, 08 March 2019

https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/31677-trump-climate-panel-could-expose-huge-fraud-hence-the-hysteria

Excerpt: ” “CO2 will be good for the Earth,” Happer told The New American magazine at a 2016 climate conference in Phoenix, Arizona, that brought together leading scientists and experts in various fields to expose the lies and alarmism. “If you look at geological history, CO2 levels are unusually low right now, it’s very seldom that they’ve been this low. Many plants are not growing as good as they could if they had more CO2, so CO2 by itself will be very good for the Earth, more will be a good thing.” He also said it was “pretty clear that we’re not going to see dangerous climate change” as a result of human CO2 emissions. “

The global warming fraud

JAY LEHR and TOM HARRIS Nov 15, 2018

https://thetandd.com/opinion/columnist/the-global-warming-fraud/article_f2514dd9-b65f-5eb1-ab38-383972f965a8.html

Excerpt: “Several U.S. states are trying to pass unconstitutional legislation that would make it a crime to speak out against man-caused global warming.

Socialists are also trying to place all energy sources under government control using a “smart grid” that will eventually be able to monitor and dictate the energy use of all Americans.

Global warming represents the most pervasive and damaging example of scientific fraud in history.”

Reporting the fraudulent practices behind global warming science

Guest Blogger / June 3, 2019 by Christopher Monckton of Brenchley

wattsupwiththat.com /2019/06/03/reporting-the-fraudulent-practices-behind-global-warming-science/

Excerpt: “I described to [the police] certain specific matters that appeared, prima facie, to be frauds. I told him exactly how the fraudulent claim of “97% consensus” had been fabricated. He got the point at once.

I went on to tell him how certain parties have wilfully and, as we see it, fraudulently thwarted our attempts to get one of the leading learned journals of climatology to publish our paper demonstrating that a single, elementary, catastrophic error of physics is the sole cause of the absurdly overblown predictions of warmer weather on the basis of which scientifically-illiterate governments have been panicked by downright evil lobby groups and profiteers of doom into causing untold death, disease, educational disadvantage, industrial destruction and financial ruin worldwide.

His eyes widened as the story unfolded.”

31,487 American scientists have signed this petition,

including 9,029 with PhDs

http://www.petitionproject.org/

Petition states: “”There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.”

61% Fake Data

https://realclimatescience.com/61-fake-data/

Excerpt: ” The vast majority of high quality long-term temperature data comes from the US, and in fact much of the planet has little or no long-term temperature data. “

One Proof offered:

U.S. Data Since 1895 [to 1989] Fail To Show Warming Trend

By PHILIP SHABECOFF and SPECIAL TO THE NEW YORK TIMES JAN. 26, 1989

https://www.nytimes.com/1989/01/26/us/us-data-since-1895-fail-to-show-warming-trend.html?src=pm

Jim Cochran: The facts show that climate change is a hoax, with redistribution of wealth as the goal

Excerpt: ” Three facts prove climate alarm is a scam — besides the 2009 Climategate emails about hiding altered climate data and refusal to share it and 2011 Climategate 2.0 emails telling colleagues to delete their data for fear of their fraud being revealed (Forbes). “

Climate change: this is the worst scientific scandal of our generation

By Christopher Booker 6:10PM GMT 28 Nov 2009

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/6679082/Climate-change-this-is-the-worst-scientific-scandal-of-our-generation.html

Excerpt: “the highly disturbing series of emails which show how Dr Jones and his colleagues have for years been discussing the devious tactics whereby they could avoid releasing their data to outsiders under freedom of information laws.

They have come up with every possible excuse for concealing the background data on which their findings and temperature records were based.

This in itself has become a major scandal, not least Dr Jones’s refusal to release the basic data from which the CRU derives its hugely influential temperature record, which culminated last summer in his startling claim that much of the data from all over the world had simply got “lost”. Most incriminating of all are the emails in which scientists are advised to delete large chunks of data, which, when this is done after receipt of a freedom of information request, is a criminal offence.”

Climategate 2.0: New E-Mails Rock The Global Warming Debate

Nov 23, 2011, 11:38am

James Taylor

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2011/11/23/climategate-2-0-new-e-mails-rock-the-global-warming-debate/#65413baf27ba

Excerpt: “Three themes are emerging from the newly released emails: (1) prominent scientists central to the global warming debate are taking measures to conceal rather than disseminate underlying data and discussions; (2) these scientists view global warming as a political “cause” rather than a balanced scientific inquiry and (3) many of these scientists frankly admit to each other that much of the science is weak and dependent on deliberate manipulation of facts and data.”

IS GLOBAL WARMING THE BIGGEST FRAUD IN HISTORY? – Dan Pena

Paraphrasing: “If global warming and ocean levels rising up to 10 feet (the low estimate) were real, there would be warnings in all the real estate prospectuses for investors, and banks would not issue loans for Florida real estate, nor could you get a loan for property in London. It is therefore the greatest fraud ever in the history of the world!”

Note: since this appears on youtube, there is a disclaimer about global warming put up, because youtube has “liberal bias”.

Dan Pena Net worth: $50 billion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Pe%C3%B1a

Ten Years after Climategate, the Global Warming Fraud Is on Life Support

By David Archibald March 21, 2019

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/03/ten_years_after_climategate_the_global_warming_fraud_is_on_life_support.html

Excerpt: “The passage of those ten years has given us another lot of data points on the global warming. There are now 40 years of satellite measurements of atmospheric temperature and this is how that plots up for the Lower 48 States:

What the graph shows is the departure from the average for the 30 years from 1981 to 2010. The last data point is February 2019 with a result of -0.03 degrees C. So we have had 40 years of global warming and the temperature has remained flat. In fact it is slightly cooler than the long term average. Is it possible to believe in global warming when the atmosphere has cooled? No, not rationally. Is it possible for global warming to be real if the atmosphere has cooled? Again no.”

UN IPCC Scientist Blows Whistle on Lies About Climate, Sea Level

Written by Alex Newman Tuesday, 12 February 2019

https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/31472-un-ipcc-scientist-blows-whistle-on-un-climate-lies

Excerpt: “Asked if coastal cities such as Miami would be flooding due to sea-level rise caused by alleged man-made global warming, Mörner was unequivocal: “Absolutely not.” “There is no rapid sea-level rise going on today, and there will not be,” he said, citing observable data. “On the contrary, if anything happens, the sea will go down a little.” The widely respected scientist, who has been tracking sea levels in various parts of the globe for some 50 years, blasted those who use incorrect “correction factors” in their data to make it appear that seas are rising worldwide. That is just wrong, he said.”

U.S. Government Accountability Office

Climate Change Funding and Management

https://www.gao.gov/key_issues/climate_change_funding_management/issue_summary

Excerpt: “Federal funding for climate change research, technology, international assistance, and adaptation has increased from $2.4 billion in 1993 to $11.6 billion in 2014, with an additional $26.1 billion for climate change programs and activities provided by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act in 2009. As shown in figure 1, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has reported federal climate change funding in three main categories since 1993:

technology to reduce emissions,

science to better understand climate change, and

international assistance for developing countries.”

My comment, by Jason Hommel: The U.S. Government, as of 2014, spent $37.7 billion promoting the fraud of global warming, and trying to stop something that is not even happening. That’s why this is an important issue.

The 97 Percent Solution

By IAN TUTTLE

October 8, 2015

https://www.nationalreview.com/2015/10/climate-change-no-its-not-97-percent-consensus-ian-tuttle/

Excerpt: “Surely the most suspicious “97 percent” study was conducted in 2013 by Australian scientist John Cook — author of the 2011 book Climate Change Denial: Heads in the Sand and creator of the blog Skeptical Science (subtitle: “Getting skeptical about global warming skepticism.”). In an analysis of 12,000 abstracts, he found “a 97% consensus among papers taking a position on the cause of global warming in the peer-reviewed literature that humans are responsible.” “Among papers taking a position” is a significant qualifier: Only 34 percent of the papers Cook examined expressed any opinion about anthropogenic climate change at all. Since 33 percent appeared to endorse anthropogenic climate change, he divided 33 by 34 and — voilà — 97 percent! When David Legates, a University of Delaware professor who formerly headed the university’s Center for Climatic Research, recreated Cook’s study, he found that “only 41 papers — 0.3 percent of all 11,944 abstracts or 1.0 percent of the 4,014 expressing an opinion, and not 97.1 percent”

https://edberry.com/blog/climate-physics/agw-hypothesis/2018-was-the-year-of-climate-truth/

” The physics I use to prove the IPCC is wrong is not complicated physics. Human CO2 adds only about 18 ppm to the atmosphere while natural CO2 adds about 392 ppm, for a total of about 410 ppm that exists today. There is no valid argument that the human contribution is any larger than 18 ppm. Therefore, all the political actions people are doing to “address climate change” and “save the planet” will have zero effect on climate. These people may call me a “denier” but it is they who deny science. “

Increased levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) have helped boost green foliage across the world’s arid regions over the past 30 years through a process called CO2 fertilisation, according to CSIRO research.

https://www.csiro.au/en/News/News-releases/2013/Deserts-greening-from-rising-CO2?fbclid=IwAR16r8nleOoIM3FjjPJrvUo2wLbRg2mIr0Ldw6K4irHTNDOWHyOxo4y6jMM

See also: