

An FBI informant connected to the Uranium One controversy told three congressional committees in written testimony that Moscow routed millions of dollars to America with the expectation it would be used to benefit Bill Clinton's charitable efforts while Secretary of State Hillary Clinton quarterbacked a “reset” in US-Russian relations.



The informant, Douglas Campbell, said in the testimony obtained by The Hill that he was told by Russian nuclear executives that Moscow had hired the American lobbying firm APCO Worldwide specifically because it was in position to influence the Obama administration, and more specifically Hillary Clinton.



...





Campbell said Russian nuclear officials “told me at various times that they expected APCO to apply a portion of the $3 million annual lobbying fee it was receiving from the Russians to provide in-kind support for the Clinton’s Global Initiative,” he added in the testimony.



“The contract called for four payments of $750,000 over twelve months. APCO was expected to give assistance free of charge to the Clinton Global Initiative as part of their effort to create a favorable environment to ensure the Obama administration made affirmative decisions on everything from Uranium One to the U.S.-Russia Civilian Nuclear Cooperation agreement. “



William D. Campbell, an American businessman, provided extensive information on other counterintelligence issues to the FBI for decades and he had also provided information to the CIA on various issues during his time overseas.



“For several years my relationship with the CIA consisted of being debriefed after foreign travel,” Campbell noted in his testimony, which was obtained by this reporter. “Gradually, the relationship evolved into the CIA tasking me to travel to specific countries to obtain specific information. In the 1990’s I developed a working relationship with Kazakhstan and Russia in their nuclear energy industries. When I told the CIA of this development, I was turned over to FBI counterintelligence agents.”

By now everyone knows that Christopher Steele's, the ex m16 british spy, dossier was used at least in part to get a fisa warrant to spy on a person that was in trumps campaign, Carter Page.The Grassley memo says that instead of verifiying all of steeles claims, the FBI relied more heavily on steeles reputation as he had worked with them before.People on ATS and elsewhere have said that this is perfectly legitgimate; that because the claims in the dossier were so serious, and Steele so reputable, that this was enough tp spy on Carter Page.Well if you followed the news, yesterday the infomant on the Uranium One scandal, Douglas Campbell, testified to congress about what he saw going on with russia in their efforts to buy Uranium.Here is part of it.Bacially he says that these russians, a couple which have actually been charged with crimes related to bribing, were actually bribing hillary and Obama connected people. In fact he goes on to say that he gave the FBI info that russia was helping iran with their nuclear program as well.When he asked why despite his years of work getting info about this, the Obama admin still allowed the sale of uranium one, he was told by the FBI it was politics.Now keep in mind, Campbell had worked for the CIA or FBI for decades.So given Campbells reputation for having worked with the CIA and FBI for years, and given the seriousness of hwat he has said, why shouldnt he be given the same treatment as Steele was, and his claims be used for fisa warrants against Hillary, Obama, and other connected people?In fact, Campbells credibility seems to be much more intact, seeing as how he never said he hated Obama or Hillary as he was compiling the data, or that he wasnt paid by opponents of Obama or Hillary to compile his research.And not to mention that the end result was that the U1 sale went through, despite the fact that we know there were criminals around the deal.So I am sure that everyoone that think steeles credibility and the seriousness of his claims were reason enough to spy on people that were in trumps team should agree Campbells credibility should be enough to spy on people in Hillary and Obamas team.Lets wiretap phones, lets check all of their emails going years back; after all we are interested in getting to the bottom of russian influence, right?