Important background information: Benghazi was the third embassy to be destroyed on a Clinton’s watch. In every instance, dozens of security requests were sent, dating back nearly a year.

U.S. received detailed warning of embassy bombing, officials say Egyptian man reportedly told of plans 9 months before Kenya attack | BALTIMORE SUN | OCT 23, 1998

NAIROBI, Kenya — Nine months before the attack on the American Embassy here, U.S. intelligence officials received a detailed warning that Islamic radicals were plotting to blow up the building, according to Kenyan and American officials.

Warnings to the FBI: Could the Bombings Have Been Prevented? | PBS

A year before the U.S. embassy bombings in East Africa, the FBI and the Kenya police raided the house of Wadih El Hage in Nairobi, Kenya in August of 1997 and found a very disturbing letter on his computer hard drive. The letter, which the FBI believes was written by Fazul Abdullah Mohammed, AKA Haroun Fazul, outlines the presence of a bin Laden terrorist “cell” in Nairobi and clearly states the member’s knowledge of bin Laden’s call to kill Americans.

With those details in mind, consider the following:

2011 Chinook shootdown in Afghanistan | WIKIPEDIA | AUG 6 2011

After US intelligence services revealed a possible location of a senior Taliban leader by the name Qari Tahir in Tangi Valley, Wardak province, Afghanistan,[15] a mission to apprehend or neutralize him was launched on the night of 5/6 August 2011 from the forward operating base in Logar Province.[15] It was led by a platoon of 47 U.S. Army Rangers with a troop of 17 U.S. Navy SEALs kept in reserve in case of need.[15][16] The Ranger platoon was transported to the area via two CH-47D transport helicopters (one of them was the accident helicopter) and supported by two AH-64 Apache helicopters and an AC-130 gunship as well as additional intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance aircraft (ISR).[15] The mission was deemed high risk.[15]

Author Don Brown, a former United States Navy JAG officer stationed at the Pentagon, and former Special Assistant United States Attorney, released a book on May 1, 2015 titled, Call Sign Extortion 17: The Shoot-Down of SEAL Team Six[40] In his book, Don Brown examines the wartime action, tells the life stories of the service members who were lost that day and questions the official military explanation of the incident contained in the infamous Colt Report, which Don Brown contends reveals either gross incompetence or a massive cover-up.

Mr. Brown indicates in his publication that the seven Afghan soldiers aboard that helicopter may have been undercover Taliban who either maneuvered the chopper within easy range of being shot down or sabotaged it from within. He makes controversial accusations that the SEALS were sacrificed on the altar of political correctness and deliberately flown into a known Taliban hot zone.

Call Sign Extortion 17: The Shoot-Down of SEAL Team Six | WIKIPEDIA | APR 11 2017

Call Sign Extortion 17: The Shoot-Down of SEAL Team Six, is a 2015 non-fiction expose, written by best-selling author and former U.S. Navy JAG Officer Don Brown, about the 2011 Chinook shootdown in Afghanistan of a United States Boeing CH-47 Chinook helicopter.[1][2][3][4][5] It is published by Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, through its Imprint, Lyons Press. In the shoot-down, 30 Americans lost their lives, including 17 U.S. Navy SEALs, most of whom were members of SEAL Team Six, officially the United States Naval Special Warfare Development Group.

He deems the Pentagon’s shifting position on the black box not to be credible, and has pointed out that a team of US Army Pathfinders was sent to the crash site to look for the black box. He criticizes the Congressional subcommittee investigating the crash [11] for not questioning why US Army Rangers were sent to search for a Black Box if there were no Black Box to begin with.

He also criticizes the official military report for claiming that U.S. Army Rangers were the first units on the ground after the crash, at 412 AM, but omitting other evidence that two other unidentified units were on the ground before the Rangers, one as early as 304 AM.

He also argues that the Taliban was tipped as to the exact landing zone, and was awaiting with RPGs, and fired a point-blank shot at the chopper upon final approach.[10] He is critical of both the military’s official investigation for not investigating British Press reports that the Taliban was tipped off, and the Congressional subcommittee which held a hearing on the matter in February 2014,[11] In the book, and in interviews with both Tom Trento and David Chadwick,[12]

Nightmare in Libya: Thousands of Surface-to-Air Missiles Unaccounted For | ABC NEWS | SEP 27 2011

The White House announced today it planned to expand a program to secure and destroy Libya’s huge stockpile of dangerous surface-to-air missiles, following an ABC News report that large numbers of them continue to be stolen from unguarded military warehouses.

ABC News reported today U.S. officials and security experts were concerned some of the thousands of heat-seeking missiles could easily end up in the hands of al Qaeda or other terrorists groups, creating a threat to commercial airliners.

“Matching up a terrorist with a shoulder-fired missile, that’s our worst nightmare,” said Sen. Barbara Boxer, D.-California, a member of the Senate’s Commerce, Energy and Transportation Committee.

Though Libya had an estimated 20,000 man-portable surface-to-air missiles before the popular uprising began in February, Assistant Secretary of State Andrew Shapiro told ABC News today the government does not have a clear picture of how many missiles they’re trying to track down.

American Killed in Libya Was on Intel Mission to Track Weapons | ABC NEWS | SEP 13 2012

In an interview with ABC News last month, Glen Doherty, a 42-year-old former Navy SEAL who worked as a contractor with the State Department, said he personally went into the field to track down so-called MANPADS, shoulder-fired surface-to-air missiles, and destroy them. After the fall of dictator Moammar Gadhafi, the State Department launched a mission to round up thousands of MANPADS that may have been looted from military installations across the country. U.S. officials previously told ABC News they were concerned the MANPADS could fall into the hands of terrorists, creating a threat to commercial airliners.

and any other aircraft

“Glen was a superb and respected operator, a true quiet professional,” Webb told ABC News today. “Don’t feel sorry for him, he wouldn’t have it. He died serving with men he respected, protecting the freedoms we enjoy as Americans and doing something he loved. He was my best friend and one of the finest human beings I’ve ever known.”

‘Lies and Deceit’: See What the Families of the SEAL Team 6 Members Slain in Chopper Crash Alleged at Their Press Conference | THE BLAZE | MAY 9 2013

Military experts and the families of the soldiers killed in the August 6, 2011, helicopter crash in Afghanistan — the single largest loss of soldiers’ lives in the Afghanistan campaign — think it is fitting that they are sharing details regarding the unusual events and unanswered questions surrounding their son’s deaths now at a time when similar themes are being discussed at the Benghazi hearings.

“I think it is timely that we are here at a time when Benghazi is going on,” Vallely said at a press conference where the family divulged details regarding their sons’ deaths. Like the events surrounding Benghazi, Vallely said he believes the crash of the helicopter, which was carrying many men who only 93 days before had aided in the killing of Osama Bin Laden, has “a constant plethora of lies and deceit.”

As the numbness over the news of their sons’ deaths began to lift, questions took its place. Charles Strange, the father of Navy SEAL Michael Strange, said he was embraced by President Barack Obama when he was receiving the body of his 25-year-old son back in the U.S. He asked the president if there would be an investigation, to which Obama said yes. In Strange’s assessment, and that of other parents present at the presser hosted by attorney Larry Klayman who is representing some of the families through Freedom Watch, such an investigation has not delved into the questions that need to be answered.

Obama stonewalls SEAL Team 6 helicopter crash probe, watchdog says | WASHINGTON TIMES | AUG 5 2015

The Obama administration is violating a judge’s order to turn over documents in the Aug. 6, 2011, shootdown of a U.S. helicopter — call sign Extortion 17 — that killed members of SEAL Team 6 in Afghanistan, a watchdog group is charging.

On the fourth anniversary of the worst one-day loss of military life in the war on terror, families of the dead say they are aghast that the government will not honor basic requests under the Freedom of Information Act.

“It has now been four years since Extortion 17 was shot down,” said Doug Hamburger, whose Army air crew son, Patrick, was one of the 30 Americans killed. “I find it quite disturbing that the government is not willing to give us the answers we deserve. I find it very irritating that we will not question the Afghans about their knowledge of what took place that night.”

The tragedy took some of the glow off SEAL Team 6’s grand achievement just three months earlier: A team penetrated Pakistan airspace, infiltrated a compound in Abbottabad and killed al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden.

The families accept the fact that a single shot brought down the helicopter. But some say the official report, which contained no direct criticism of decision-makers that day, did not delve deeply enough.

They believe SEAL Team 6 had a target on its back and that persons inside the Afghan National Security Forces may have tipped off the Taliban that night in Tangi Valley. That is why, they say, a fighter just happened to be stationed in a turret within 150 yards of a landing zone that had never been used before.

Benghazi Victim’s Widow: Ty’s Death ‘Handled With Disrespect and Negligence’ by Clinton and Obama | CNS NEWS | AUG 4 2016

Dr. Dorothy Narvaez-Woods, the Gold Star widow of Tyrone Woods who was murdered in the 2012 attack on the U.S. compound in Benghazi, Libya, said that then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton did not send military help during the attack, and that Woods’ death “was ultimately handled with disrespect and negligence by both Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration.”

Dorothy Woods, DDS, is a veteran of the U.S. Navy and the mother of Kai Woods, the son she and her late husband Tyrone Woods had together. In an interview with talk-radio host Hugh Hewitt on Aug. 4, Mrs. Woods talked about her experience with the military and particularly the Navy SEALS – Tyrone Woods was a Navy SEAL and, at the time of his death, working security as a contractor for the CIA, along with fellow SEAL Glen Doherty.

‘What’s the chance of two ex-Navy SEALs turning up dead in the same room?’ Family and friends demand U.S. investigation into COVER UP deaths on ship made famous by Captain Philips | DAILY MAIL | MAR 7 2014

Disbelieving family and friends of an ex-Navy SEAL who died of an apparent drugs overdose on the ship made famous in the movie Captain Phillips are convinced of a ‘cover-up’ and have called for a US investigation into his death, MailOnline can reveal today.

The body of Mark Kennedy, a super fit, highly-decorated member of the elite fighting force, was found inside a cabin on the cargo ship Maersk Alabama – the vessel involved in a 2009 hijacking that ended with Somali pirates shot dead by SEALs.

Another former SEAL, Jeffrey Reynolds, was found alongside him, also dead from a suspected drug overdose. The men were seen partying with two women believed to be prostitutes the previous evening.



By who?

Crew members: ‘Captain Phillips’ is one big lie | NY POST | OCT 13 2013

All of this is the basis for “Captain Phillips,” starring Tom Hanks as the titular, real-life hero. The only problem, say some members of the real Capt. Phillips’ crew, is none of it is true.

Capt. Richard Phillips, they say, is no hero, and the film is one big lie.

The Maersk Alabama leaving the Port of Mombasa, Kenya in 2009.Photo: AP The Maersk Alabama leaving the Port of Mombasa, Kenya in 2009.Photo: AP

“Phillips wasn’t the big leader like he is in the movie,” says one crew member, who, for legal reasons, spoke with The Post anonymously. He worked very closely with Phillips on the Maersk Alabama and was alarmed by his behavior from the beginning. Phillips, he says, had a bad reputation for at least 12 years prior, known as a sullen and self-righteous captain.

“No one wants to sail with him,” he says.

After the hijacking, 11 crew members have sued Maersk Line and the Waterman Steamship Corp. for almost $50 million, alleging “willful, wanton and conscious disregard for their safety.” Phillips is a witness for the defense.

“The crew had begged Captain Phillips not to go so close to the Somali coast,” said Deborah Waters, the attorney who brought the claim. “He told them he wouldn’t let pirates scare him or force him to sail away from the coast.”

‘REAL ARROGANT’

Phillips had taken command of the Maerskin late March 2009. Left for him, says the crew member, was a detailed anti-piracy plan now used by all ships per the International Maritime Organization. Should pirates get too close, the crew should cut the lights and power and lock themselves below deck.

“He didn’t want anything to do with it, because it wasn’t his plan,” says the crew member. “He was real arrogant.” Phillips says he knows nothing about such a plan.

Over this three-week period, 16 container ships in the same region had been attacked by pirates, and eight had been taken hostage.

As the film opens, Hanks, as Phillips, is seen assiduously tending to safety protocols. “Let’s tighten up security!” he orders. “I want everything closed, locked, even in port.”

Phillips has admitted that, on board, he got seven e-mails about increased piracy off Somalia — each exhorting ships to move farther offshore by at least 600 miles.

The Maersk was 235 miles off the coast, says the crew member, though Phillips has since rounded that number up to 300.

“I couldn’t tell you exactly the miles,” Phillips tells The Post. “I don’t know.”

In 2010, Phillips told CNN the Maersk was 300 miles off shore; published reports from that time had the ship at 240.

U.S. Imposes Sanctions on Libya in Wake of Crackdown | NEW YORK TIMES | FEB 25 2011

U.N. votes to impose sanction on Gaddafi | WASHINGTON POST | FEB 26 2011

The drama unfolded as the 15-nation council considered a package of sanctions, including an arms embargo, a travel ban and an asset freeze on Gaddafi and his associates.

The arms embargo is designed to prevent Gaddafi from resupplying loyalist forces, including thousands of African mercenaries.

U.S.-Approved Arms for Libya Rebels Fell Into Jihadis’ Hands | NEW YORK TIMES | DEC 5 2012

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration secretly gave its blessing to arms shipments to Libyan rebels from Qatar last year, but American officials later grew alarmed as evidence grew that Qatar was turning some of the weapons over to Islamic militants, according to United States officials and foreign diplomats.

Tiny Kingdom’s Huge Role in Libya Draws Concern | WALL STREET JOURNAL | OCT 17, 2011

Qatar provided anti-Gadhafi rebels with what Libyan officials now estimate are tens of millions of dollars in aid, military training and more than 20,000 tons of weapons. Qatar’s involvement in the battle to oust Col. Gadhafi was supported by U.S. and Western allies, as well as many Libyans themselves.

But now, as this North African nation attempts to build a new government from scratch, some of these same figures worry that Qatar’s new influence is putting stability in peril.

At issue, say Libyan officials and Western observers, are Qatar’s deep ties to a clique of Libyan Islamists, whose backgrounds variously include fighting in Afghanistan in the 1980s and spending years in jail under Col. Gadhafi. They later published a theological treatise condemning violent jihad. With Qatar’s support, they have become central players in Libyan politics. As they face off with a transitional authority largely led by secular former regime officials and expatriate technocrats, their political rivals accuse Qatar of stacking the deck in the Islamists’ favor.

With the blessing of Western intelligence agencies, Qatar flew at least 18 weapons shipments in all to anti-Gadhafi rebel forces this spring and summer, according to people familiar with the shipments. The majority of these National Transition shipments went not through the rebels’ governing body, the National Transitional Council, but directly to militias run by Islamist leaders including Mr. Belhaj, say Libyan officials.

Separately, approximately a dozen other Qatari-funded shipments, mostly containing ammunition, came to Libyan rebels via Sudan, according to previously undisclosed Libyan intelligence documents reviewed by The Wall Street Journal as well as officials.

Qatar is a nation of Wahhabi radicals. They support the caliphate. Barack Hussein Obama made a deal with the Devil.

EAGER TO ‘HELP’ | QATAR BECOMES 1ST ARAB COUNTRY TO FLY OVER LIBYA | WASHINGTON TIMES | MAR 25, 2011

“TRIPOLI, Libya (AP) — Tiny Qatar became the first Arab country to fly combat missions over Libya on Friday after NATO agreed to take command of the no-fly zone part of air operations against Moammar Gadhafi’s regime.”

QATAR’S EMIR VISITS GAZA, PLEDGING $400,000,000 TO HAMAS | NYT | OCT 23, 2012

U.S. APPROVED ARMS FOR LIBYA REBELS FELL INTO JIHADIS’ HANDS | NYT | DEC 5, 2012

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration secretly gave its blessing to arms shipments to Libyan rebels from Qatar last year, but American officials later grew alarmed as evidence grew that Qatar was turning some of the weapons over to Islamic militants, according to United States officials and foreign diplomats.

QATAR ISLAMIC CHARITY OFFICIALS GAVE MILLIONS TO AL-QAEDA, U.S. SAYS | WA POST | DEC 22, 2013

FORMER HEAD OF HUMAN RIGHTS CHARITY ACCUSED OF LEADING DOUBLE LIFE AS TERRORIST FUNDRAISER | TELEGRAPH | SEP 20, 2014

“Abdul Rahman al-Nuaimi accused of sitting at centre of web of funding for al-Qaeda affiliates in countries ranging from Yemen to Syria, to Iraq to Somalia.”

“Mr Nuaimi, 60, has previously worked as a professor of history at Qatar University and even as president of the Qatar Football Association.”

“A leaked cable from the US Embassy in Doha in 2007 describes him as an “Islamist hardliner” and states that he was briefly jailed in 2000, for criticising the wife of Qatar’s then ruler for her role in public life.” US DIPLOMATIC CABLE | WIKILEAKS

He also was a founding board member of the Eid bin Mohammed Al Thani Charitable Association and a past board member of Qatar Islamic Bank.

EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN JOHN PODESTA & HILLARY CLINTON ACKNOWLEDGING QATAR’S AND SAUDI ARABIA’S INVOLVEMENT IN TERROR FUNDING | WIKILEAKS | AUG 29, 2014 “While this military/para-military operation is moving forward, we need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL and other radical Sunni groups in the region.” “The Qataris and Saudis will be put in a position of balancing policy between their ongoing competition to dominate the Sunni world and the consequences of serious U.S. pressure. By the same token, the threat of similar, realistic U.S. operations will serve To assist moderate forces in Libya, Lebanon, and even Jordan, where insurgents are increasingly fascinated by the ISIL success in Iraq.” Qatar’s Support of Islamists Alienates Allies Near and Far | NY TIMES | SEP 7, 2014 HOW QATAR IS FUNDING THE RISE OF ISLAMIST EXTREMISTS | TELEGRAPH UK | SEP 21, 2014 Western officials have tracked the Qatari arms flights as they land in the city of Misrata, about 100 miles east of Tripoli, where the Islamist militias have their stronghold. Even after the fall of the capital and the removal of Libya’s government, Qatar is “still flying in weapons straight to Misrata airport”, said a senior Western official. GOVERNMENT DONATION TO MUSLIM CHARITIES FORUM DENOUNCED AS “MADNESS” | TELEGRAPH | SEP 23, 2014 A government department donated £18,000 to a charity coalition with ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, a group whose activities Britain has vowed to curtail following concerns over their extremist links in the Middle East, it has been claimed. The Case Against Qatar | FOREIGN POLICY VOICE | SEP 30, 2014 The tiny, gas-rich emirate has pumped tens of millions of dollars through obscure funding networks to hard-line Syrian rebels and extremist Salafists, building a foreign policy that punches above its weight. After years of acquiescing — even taking advantage of its ally’s meddling — Washington may finally be punching back. BANKER WHO FINANCED 9/11 MASTERMIND NOW FUNDING TERRORISTS IN SYRIA AND IRAQ | TELEGRAPH | OCT 4, 2014 Khalifa Muhammad Turki al-Subaiy – a Qatari citizen who was said to have provided ‘financial support’ for Khalid Sheikh Mohammed – was jailed for terrorist offences in 2008 but released after only six months.A terrorist financier from Qatar is at the centre of a jihadi network linking him to al-Qaeda fighters in Syria and Iraq. STATE DEPARTMENT DEFENDS PARTNERSHIP WITH HAMAS-SUPPORTING QATAR | CNS NEWS | DEC 2, 2014 US CONGRESS INFORMED OF QATARI “CHARITIES” FINANCING TERRORISM | DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSMAN BRAD SHERMAN | DEC 10, 2014 U.S. ALLY QATAR SHELTERS JIHADI MONEYMEN | THE DAILY BEAST | DEC 10, 2014

TERRORIST FINANCE: ACTION REQUEST FOR SENIOR LEVEL ENGAGEMENT ON TERRORISM FINANCE | WIKILEAKS 09STATE131801_a

While the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) takes seriously the threat of terrorism within Saudi Arabia, it has been an ongoing challenge to persuade Saudi officials to treat terrorist financing emanating from Saudi Arabia as a strategic priority.

Saudi Arabia remains a critical financial support base for al-Qa’ida, the Taliban, LeT, and other terrorist groups, including Hamas. Riyadh has taken only limited action to disrupt fundraising for the UN 1267-listed Taliban and LeT-groups that are also aligned with al-Qa’ida and focused on undermining stability in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

While the GOK has demonstrated a willingness to take action when attacks target Kuwait, it has been less inclined to take action against Kuwait-based financiers and facilitators plotting attacks outside of Kuwait. Al-Qa’ida and other groups continue to exploit Kuwait both as a source of funds and as a key transit point.

United Arab Emirates (UAE)-based donors have provided financial support to a variety of terrorist groups, including al-Qa’ida, the Taliban, LeT and other terrorist groups, including Hamas.

Pakistan’s intermittent support to terrorist groups and militant organizations threatens to undermine regional security and endanger U.S. national security objectives in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Qatar has adopted a largely passive approach to cooperating with the U.S. against terrorist financing. Qatar’s overall level of CT cooperation with the U.S. is considered the worst in the region. Al-Qaida, the Taliban, UN-1267 listed LeT, and other terrorist groups exploit Qatar as a fundraising locale. Although Qatar’s security services have the capability to deal with direct threats and occasionally have put that capability to use, they have been hesitant to act against known terrorists out of concern for appearing to be aligned with the U.S. and provoking reprisals.

Why don’t news releases from the Defense Security Cooperation Agency make note of this? In fact, they say just the opposite.



FOREIGN MILITARY SALE REQUEST NOTIFCATION | DSCA | JUL 12, 2012

“WASHINGTON, July 12, 2012 – The Defense Security Cooperation Agency notified Congress July 10 of a possible Foreign Military Sale to the Government of Qatar for 24 AH-64D APACHE Block III LONGBOW Attack Helicopters and associated equipment, parts, training and logistical support for an estimated cost of $3.0 billion.”

“This proposed sale will contribute to the foreign policy and national security of the United States by helping to improve the security of a friendly country that has been, and continues to be, an important force for political and economic progress in the Middle East.”

“The helicopters will provide a long-term defensive and offensive capability to the Qatari peninsula as well as enhance the protection of key oil and gas infrastructure and platforms …”

The prime contractors will be The Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation, General Electric, Longbow Limited Liability Corporation, and Raytheon Corporation.

“There are no known offset agreements proposed in connection with this potential sale.”

FOREIGN MILITARY SALE REQUEST NOTIFCATION | DSCA | NOV 5, 2012

“WASHINGTON, November 5, 2012 – The Defense Security Cooperation Agency notified Congress November 2 of a possible Foreign Military Sale to the Government of Qatar for two Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) Fire Units and associated equipment, parts, training and logistical support for an estimated cost of $6.5 billion.”

“This proposed sale will contribute to the foreign policy and national security of the United States by helping to improve the security of a friendly country that has been and continues to be an important force for political stability and economic progress in the Middle East.”

“There are no known offset agreements proposed in connection with this potential sale at this time.”

FOREIGN MILITARY SALE REQUEST NOTIFCATION | DSCA | NOV 7, 2012

“WASHINGTON, November 7, 2012 – The Defense Security Cooperation Agency notified Congress Nov. 6 of a possible Foreign Military Sale to the Government of Qatar for the sale of 11 PATRIOT Configuration-3 Modernized Fire Units and associated equipment, parts, training and logistical support for an estimated cost of $9.9 billion.”

“This proposed sale will contribute to the foreign policy and national security of the United States by improving the security of an important ally which has been, and continues to be, a force for political stability and economic progress in the Middle East. This sale is consistent with U.S. initiatives to provide key allies in the region with modern systems that will enhance interoperability with U.S. forces and increase security.”

The prime contractors will be Raytheon Corporation and Lockheed-Martin.

“There are no known offset agreements proposed in connection with this potential sale.”

DSCA Foreign Military Sale Request Notifications (PDF)

Qatar is not the only country harboring terrorists and buying arms.

bahrain_09-14bahrain_10-57_0bahrain_10-71_0eg_10-18_0eg_10-21_0egypt_09-59_0egypt_09-54_0egypt_09-68_0egypt_09-43ghana_09-47_0egypt_09-34egypt_09-71_0iraq_09-73_0egypt_10-67_0iraq_10-12_0iraq_10-23iraq_10-31_0jordan_09-33iraq_10-69_0iraq_10-65_0iraq_10-48_0iraq_10-47_0israel_10-41_0iraq_10-78_0jordan_09-46_0iraq_11-11_0jordan_09-74_0iraq_11-23_0jordon_09-32_0kuwait_09-30iraq_12-30_0kuwait_09-29iraq_11-46_0kuwait_09-26iraq_11-35_0iraq_12-42_0kuwait_09-31lebanon_12-07_0iraq_12-63_0kuwait_09-58_0kuwait_09-66_0kuwait_10-34_0morocco_11-01_0kuwait_9-24morocco_09-53_0kuwait_09-78_0morocco_09-25_0morocco_11-07_0kuwait_10-51_0mu_10-05_0morocco_12-28_0kuwait_11-41_0oman_10-40_0kuwait_12-18_0pakistan_10-07_0oman_11-38_0kuwait_12-17_0oman_10-49_0kuwait_11-53_0

oman_12-19_0kuwait_12-20_0pakistan_10-28qatar_11-26_0oman_12-64_0kuwait_12-29_0qatar_12-13_0saudi_arabia_09-63_0qatar_12-10_0oman12-66_0qatar_12-08_0pakistan_11-04_0saudi_arabia_10-03_0qatar_12-24_0saudi_arabia_10-20qatar_12-49_0saudi_arabia_10-24tu_10-11_0turkey_09-70_0qatar_12-59_0saudi_arabia_10-44_0turkey_09-44_0qatar_12-58_0saudi_arabia_10-43_0_0saudi_arabia_10-45_0saudi_arabia_10-46_0turkey_12-12_0saudi_arabia_10-68_0uae_09-42saudi_arabia_11-29_0saudi_arabia_10-74_0uae_09-69_0saudi_arabia_10-77_0uae_09-67_0saudi_arabia_10-75_0uae_09-61_0uae_09-72_0saudi_arabia_11-50_0uae_10-06_0saudi_arabia_12-22_0uae_10-25_0saudi_arabia_12-36_0uae_10-79_0saudi_arabia_12-61_0uae_10-58_0_0uae_10-56_0saudi_arabia_12-55_0uae_10-52_0saudi_arabia_12-65_0uae_11-02_0saudia_arabia_09-20uae_11-17_0saudia_arabia_09-40uae_11-27_0uae_12-40_0uae_12-38_0uae_11-45_0

Military intel predicted rise of ISIS in 2012, detailed arms shipments from Benghazi to Syria | FOX | MAY 18 2015 Seventeen months before President Obama dismissed the Islamic State as a “JV team,” a Defense Intelligence Agency report predicted the rise of the terror group and likely establishment of a caliphate if its momentum was not reversed. While the report was circulated to the CIA, State Department and senior military leaders, among others, it’s not known whether Obama was ever briefed on the document. The DIA report, which was reviewed by Fox News, was obtained through a federal lawsuit by conservative watchdog Judicial Watch. Documents from the lawsuit also reveal a host of new details about events leading up to the 2012 Benghazi terror attack — and how the movement of weapons from Libya to Syria fueled the violence there. The report on the growing threat posed by what is now known as the Islamic State was sent on Aug. 5, 2012. ‘Bullets everywhere’: Navy SEAL killed by ISIS was sucked into a hellish fight | NAVY TIMES | MAY 4 2016 The Navy SEAL killed in Iraq Tuesday was part of a “quick reaction force” attempting to extract a team of American combat advisers who came under attack from Islamic State militants in Iraq’s Kurdish region. Navy SEAL killed in Iraq was part of rescue team | PBS | MAY 4 2016 The small team of American advisers went to Teleskof, about 14 miles north of Mosul, to meet with Kurdish peshmerga forces. Warren said that Islamic State fighters launched a large, complex attack on the peshmerga there around 7:30 a.m., with armored Humvees and bulldozers, and broke through the front lines. Navy SEAL Is Killed in Northern Iraq in Fight With ISIS | NY TIMES | MAY 3 2016 WASHINGTON — Islamic State fighters killed a member of the Navy SEALs on Tuesday after they broke through Kurdish defenses in northern Iraq, in what military officials described as the militant group’s biggest offensive in months. Gov. Doug Ducey of Arizona identified the serviceman as Charlie Keating IV, the grandson of the Arizona financier Charles H. Keating Jr., who was imprisoned in the savings-and-loan crisis of the 1980s. 18 U.S. Code Chapter 115 – TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES | LEGAL INFORMATION INSTITUTE 18 U.S. Code § 2381 – Treason Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 807 Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII , § 330016(2)(J), , 108 Stat. 2148 .) 18 U.S. Code § 2382 – Misprision of treason Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.

18 U.S. Code § 2383 – Rebellion or insurrection

Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

18 U.S. Code § 2384 – Seditious conspiracy If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both. 18 U.S. Code § 2385 – Advocating overthrow of Government Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government; or Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts to do so; or Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof— Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction. If two or more persons conspire to commit any offense named in this section, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction. As used in this section, the terms “organizes” and “organize”, with respect to any society, group, or assembly of persons, include the recruiting of new members, the forming of new units, and the regrouping or expansion of existing clubs, classes, and other units of such society, group, or assembly of persons.

18 U.S. Code § 2386 – Registration of certain organizations (A) For the purposes of this section:“Attorney General” means the Attorney General of the United States;“Organization” means any group, club, league, society, committee, association, political party, or combination of individuals, whether incorporated or otherwise, but such term shall not include any corporation, association, community chest, fund, or foundation, organized and operated exclusively for religious, charitable, scientific, literary, or educational purposes;“Political activity” means any activity the purpose or aim of which, or one of the purposes or aims of which, is the control by force or overthrow of the Government of the United States or a political subdivision thereof, or any State or political subdivision thereof;An organization is engaged in “civilian military activity” if: (1) it gives instruction to, or prescribes instruction for, its members in the use of firearms or other weapons or any substitute therefor, or military or naval science; or (2) it receives from any other organization or from any individual instruction in military or naval science; or (3) it engages in any military or naval maneuvers or activities; or (4) it engages, either with or without arms, in drills or parades of a military or naval character; or (5) it engages in any other form of organized activity which in the opinion of the Attorney General constitutes preparation for military action; An organization is “subject to foreign control” if: (a) it solicits or accepts financial contributions, loans, or support of any kind, directly or indirectly, from, or is affiliated directly or indirectly with, a foreign government or a political subdivision thereof, or an agent, agency, or instrumentality of a foreign government or political subdivision thereof, or a political party in a foreign country, or an international political organization; or (b) its policies, or any of them, are determined by or at the suggestion of, or in collaboration with, a foreign government or political subdivision thereof, or an agent, agency, or instrumentality of a foreign government or a political subdivision thereof, or a political party in a foreign country, or an international political organization. (B) (1) The following organizations shall be required to register with the Attorney General:Every organization subject to foreign control which engages in political activity; Every organization which engages both in civilian military activity and in political activity; Every organization subject to foreign control which engages in civilian military activity; and Every organization, the purpose or aim of which, or one of the purposes or aims of which, is the establishment, control, conduct, seizure, or overthrow of a government or subdivision thereof by the use of force, violence, military measures, or threats of any one or more of the foregoing. Every such organization shall register by filing with the Attorney General, on such forms and in such detail as the Attorney General may by rules and regulations prescribe, a registration statement containing the information and documents prescribed in subsection (B)(3) and shall within thirty days after the expiration of each period of six months succeeding the filing of such registration statement, file with the Attorney General, on such forms and in such detail as the Attorney General may by rules and regulations prescribe, a supplemental statement containing such information and documents as may be necessary to make the information and documents previously filed under this section accurate and current with respect to such preceding six months’ period. Every statement required to be filed by this section shall be subscribed, under oath, by all of the officers of the organization. (2) This section shall not require registration or the filing of any statement with the Attorney General by: (a) The armed forces of the United States; or (b) The organized militia or National Guard of any State, Territory, District, or possession of the United States; or (c) Any law-enforcement agency of the United States or of any Territory, District or possession thereof, or of any State or political subdivision of a State, or of any agency or instrumentality of one or more States; or (d) Any duly established diplomatic mission or consular office of a foreign government which is so recognized by the Department of State; or (e) Any nationally recognized organization of persons who are veterans of the armed forces of the United States, or affiliates of such organizations. (3) Every registration statement required to be filed by any organization shall contain the following information and documents: (a) The name and post-office address of the organization in the United States, and the names and addresses of all branches, chapters, and affiliates of such organization; (b) The name, address, and nationality of each officer, and of each person who performs the functions of an officer, of the organization, and of each branch, chapter, and affiliate of the organization; (c) The qualifications for membership in the organization; (d) The existing and proposed aims and purposes of the organization, and all the means by which these aims or purposes are being attained or are to be attained; (e) The address or addresses of meeting places of the organization, and of each branch, chapter, or affiliate of the organization, and the times of meetings; (f) The name and address of each person who has contributed any money, dues, property, or other thing of value to the organization or to any branch, chapter, or affiliate of the organization; (g) A detailed statement of the assets of the organization, and of each branch, chapter, and affiliate of the organization, the manner in which such assets were acquired, and a detailed statement of the liabilities and income of the organization and of each branch, chapter, and affiliate of the organization; (h) A detailed description of the activities of the organization, and of each chapter, branch, and affiliate of the organization; (i) A description of the uniforms, badges, insignia, or other means of identification prescribed by the organization, and worn or carried by its officers or members, or any of such officers or members; (j) A copy of each book, pamphlet, leaflet, or other publication or item of written, printed, or graphic matter issued or distributed directly or indirectly by the organization, or by any chapter, branch, or affiliate of the organization, or by any of the members of the organization under its authority or within its knowledge, together with the name of its author or authors and the name and address of the publisher; (k) A description of all firearms or other weapons owned by the organization, or by any chapter, branch, or affiliate of the organization, identified by the manufacturer’s number thereon; (l) In case the organization is subject to foreign control, the manner in which it is so subject; (m) A copy of the charter, articles of association, constitution, bylaws, rules, regulations, agreements, resolutions, and all other instruments relating to the organization, powers, and purposes of the organization and to the powers of the officers of the organization and of each chapter, branch, and affiliate of the organization; and (n) Such other information and documents pertinent to the purposes of this section as the Attorney General may from time to time require.All statements filed under this section shall be public records and open to public examination and inspection at all reasonable hours under such rules and regulations as the Attorney General may prescribe. (C) The Attorney General is authorized at any time to make, amend, and rescind such rules and regulations as may be necessary to carry out this section, including rules and regulations governing the statements required to be filed. (D) Whoever violates any of the provisions of this section shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.Whoever in a statement filed pursuant to this section willfully makes any false statement or willfully omits to state any fact which is required to be stated, or which is necessary to make the statements made not misleading, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. 18 U.S. Code § 2387 – Activities affecting armed forces generally (a) Whoever, with intent to interfere with, impair, or influence the loyalty, morale, or discipline of the military or naval forces of the United States: (1) advises, counsels, urges, or in any manner causes or attempts to cause insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty by any member of the military or naval forces of the United States; or (2) distributes or attempts to distribute any written or printed matter which advises, counsels, or urges insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty by any member of the military or naval forces of the United States— Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction. (b) For the purposes of this section, the term “military or naval forces of the United States” includes the Army of the United States, the Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Coast Guard, Navy Reserve, Marine Corps Reserve, and Coast Guard Reserve of the United States; and, when any merchant vessel is commissioned in the Navy or is in the service of the Army or the Navy, includes the master, officers, and crew of such vessel. 18 U.S. Code § 2388 – Activities affecting armed forces during war (a) Whoever, when the United States is at war, willfully makes or conveys false reports or false statements with intent to interfere with the operation or success of the military or naval forces of the United States or to promote the success of its enemies; orWhoever, when the United States is at war, willfully causes or attempts to cause insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty, in the military or naval forces of the United States, or willfully obstructs the recruiting or enlistment service of the United States, to the injury of the service or the United States, or attempts to do so— Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both. (b) If two or more persons conspire to violate subsection (a) of this section and one or more such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each of the parties to such conspiracy shall be punished as provided in said subsection (a). (c) Whoever harbors or conceals any person who he knows, or has reasonable grounds to believe or suspect, has committed, or is about to commit, an offense under this section, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both. (d) This section shall apply within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of the United States, and on the high seas, as well as within the United States. 18 U.S. Code § 2389 – Recruiting for service against United States Whoever recruits soldiers or sailors within the United States, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction thereof, to engage in armed hostility against the same; or Whoever opens within the United States, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction thereof, a recruiting station for the enlistment of such soldiers or sailors to serve in any manner in armed hostility against the United States— Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. 18 U.S. Code § 2390 – Enlistment to serve against United States Whoever enlists or is engaged within the United States or in any place subject to the jurisdiction thereof, with intent to serve in armed hostility against the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. Definition of offset agreement | FINANCIAL TIMES | LEXICON “An offset agreement is a type of side deal, sometimes best described as a sweetener. This is an agreement between two or more parties that provides additional benefits and is ancillary to another negotiated contract.” “The deal is between a government and company, often a defence company but it can also be used in big civil deals for items such as infrastructure and transport. The company ($$ COUNTRY-> CLINTON <- CONTRACTOR $$) “Companies (and the foreign countries in this case) do this because it boosts their chance to win lucrative government contracts, particularly in developing countries.” “A company’s offset obligation is usually worth 50-100 per cent of the value of the contract and can be direct or indirect. Direct offsets are linked to the original defence contact. Companies often agree to transfer relevant technological knowhow or use local suppliers to build the equipment they are selling to the government.” U.S. Code Title 22 Chapter 39 Subchapter I § 2752 (b) Responsibility for supervision and direction of sales, leases, financing, cooperative projects, and exports Under the direction of the President, the Secretary of State (taking into account other United States activities abroad, such as military assistance, economic assistance, and the food for peace program) shall be responsible for the continuous supervision and general direction of sales, leases, financing, cooperative projects, and exports under this chapter, including, but not limited to, determining whether there will be a sale to or financing for a country and the amount thereof; whether there will be a lease to a country;

whether there will be a cooperative project and the scope thereof; and

whether there will be delivery or other performance under such sale, lease, cooperative project, or export, to the end that sales, financing, leases, cooperative projects, and exports will be integrated with other United States activities and to the end that the foreign policy of the United States would be best served thereby. Clinton Foundation Donors Include: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia $10,000,001 – $25,000,000 Friends of Saudi Arabia $1,000,001 – $5,000,000 Sheikh Mohammed H. Al-Amoudi $5,000,001 – $10,000,000 State of Qatar $1,000,001 – $5,000,000 Qatar 2022 Supreme Committee $250,001 – $500,000 Qatar Foundation International $100,001 – $250,000 The Government of Brunei Darussalam $1,000,001 – $5,000,000 The Sultanate of Oman $1,000,001 – $5,000,000 United Arab Emirates $1,000,001 – $5,000,000 Dubai Foundation (UAE) $1,000,001 – $5,000,000 Dubai Financial Market (UAE) $10,001 – $25,000 Abraaj Holdings (UAE) $500,001 – $1,000,000 State of Kuwait $5,000,001 – $10,000,000 National Bank of Kuwait SAK $25,001 – $50,000 OCP Corporation (Morocco) $1,000,001 – $5,000,000 BMCE Bank (Morocco) $100,001 – $250,000 Bahrain Petroleum Company $10,001 – $25,000 Kingdom of Bahrain $50,001 – $100,000 Gulf Finance House (Bahrain) $50,001 – $100,000

US approved $40 billion in 2009 private arms sales | WASHINGTON POST ARTICLE | MAR 11 2011 The U.S. government approved $40 billion in worldwide private arms sales in 2009, including more than $7 billion to Mideast and North African nations that are struggling with political upheaval, the State Department reported. From 2008 to 2009, the U.S. authorized increasing sales of military shipments to the now-toppled Egyptian government of Hosni Mubarak and the embattled kingdom of Bahrain. The $40 billion figure during the first year of the Obama administration reflects a rise in total approved arms sales over the final year of the Bush administration in 2008, when the State Department licensed $34.2 billion. The $7.3 billion in U.S.-approved defense sales to Mideast and North African countries in 2009 totaled up to nearly a fifth of the entire $40 billion in licensed sales – indications of both the region’s strategic importance and their governments’ willingness to pay top dollar for American defense equipment. Iraq, where U.S. forces are still drawing down and the fledgling government is struggling against militants, was the biggest buyer ($1.51 billion), closely followed by Turkey ($1.50 billion) and the United Arab Emirates ($1.09 billion). U.S. Arms Sales Make Up Most of Global Market | AUG. 26, 2012 | NY TIMES ARTICLE Weapons sales by the United States tripled in 2011 to a record high, driven by major arms sales to Persian Gulf allies. Overseas weapons sales by the United States totaled $66.3 billion. The American weapons sales total was an “extraordinary increase” over the $21.4 billion in deals for 2010, the study found, and was the largest single-year sales total in the history of United States arms exports. The previous high was in fiscal year 2009, when American weapons sales overseas totaled nearly $31 billion. Increasing tensions drove a set of Persian Gulf nations – Saudi Arabia, UAE and Oman to purchase weapons at record levels. The agreements with Saudi Arabia included the purchase of 84 advanced F-15 fighters, a variety of ammunition, missiles and logistics support, and upgrades of 70 of the F-15 fighters in the current fleet. Sales to Saudi Arabia last year also included dozens of Apache and Black Hawk helicopters, all contributing to a total Saudi weapons deal from the United States of $33.4 billion, according to the study. The United Arab Emirates purchased a Terminal High Altitude Area Defense, an advanced antimissile shield that includes radars and is valued at $3.49 billion, as well as 16 Chinook helicopters for $939 million. Oman bought 18 F-16 fighters for $1.4 billion. Here’s who buys the most weapons from the U.S. | CNN ARTICLE | MAY 25, 2016 The U.S. is responsible for nearly 33% of worldwide exports — by far the top arms exporter on the planet — but which countries does the U.S. sell the most weapons to? Saudi Arabia was the top recipient of American-made arms from 2011-2015, followed closely by the United Arab Emirates. Experts believe the Middle East will remain a top destination for weapons for some time — it currently accounts for about 40% of U.S. arms exports — especially given the rise of ISIS. The American exports include everything from small arms to fighter jet aircraft and tanks, to Patriot Missile batteries. U.S. defense companies were explicit in their desire to boost international exports in the wake of recent defense budget cuts. CEO of U.S. defense giant Lockheed Martin, Marillyn Hewson, said, “One area where we expect the majority of our growth potential to come from in the years ahead is our international customers.” Under Clinton’s leadership, the State Department approved $165 billion worth of commercial arms sales to 20 nations whose governments have given money to the Clinton Foundation | INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS TIMES Even by the standards of arms deals between the United States and Saudi Arabia, this one was enormous. A consortium of American defense contractors led by Boeing would deliver $29 billion worth of advanced fighter jets to the United States’ oil-rich ally in the Middle East. At press conferences in Washington to announce the department’s approval, an assistant secretary of state, Andrew Shapiro, declared that the deal had been “a top priority” for Clinton personally. In the years before Hillary Clinton became secretary of state, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia contributed at least $10 million to the Clinton Foundation. Just two months before the deal was finalized, Boeing — the defense contractor that manufactures one of the fighter jets the Saudis were especially keen to acquire, the F-15 — contributed $900,000 to the Clinton Foundation, according to a company press release. Lockheed Martin “Donations” to the Clinton Foundation” The Lockheed Martin Foundation $10,001 – $25,000

Lockheed Martin Corporation $100,001 – $250,000 Lobbying fees paid to Podesta Group: $6,600,000 1998 | Lockheed Martin | $20,000

1999 | Lockheed Martin | $280,000

2000 | Lockheed Martin | $240,000

2001 | Lockheed Martin | $260,000

2002 | Lockheed Martin | $280,000

2003 | Lockheed Martin | $140,000

2004 | Lockheed Martin | $280,000

2005 | Lockheed Martin | $280,000

2006 | Lockheed Martin | $200,000

2007 | Lockheed Martin | $200,000

2008 | Lockheed Martin | $240,000

2009 | Lockheed Martin | $420,000

2010 | Lockheed Martin | $440,000

2011 | Lockheed Martin | $530,000

2012 | Lockheed Martin | $650,000

2013 | Lockheed Martin | $620,000

2014 | Lockheed Martin | $550,000

2015 | Lockheed Martin | $550,000

2016 | Lockheed Martin | $420,000 Side note: Mr. James Comey served as General Counsel and Senior Vice President of Lockheed Martin Corporation from October 1, 2005 to June 24, 2010. General Dynamics Lobbying fees paid to Podesta Group: $3,450,000 2005 | General Dynamics | $40,000 2006 | General Dynamics | $200,000 2007 | General Dynamics | $400,000 2008 | General Dynamics | $360,000 2009 | General Dynamics | $560,000 2010 | General Dynamics | $560,000 2011 | General Dynamics | $320,000 2012 | General Dynamics | $440,000 2013 | General Dynamics | $240,000 2014 | General Dynamics | $120,000 2015 | General Dynamics | $120,000 2016 | General Dynamics | $90,000 Boeing “Donations” to the Clinton Foundation The Boeing Company $1,000,001 – $5,000,000 Lobbying fees paid to Podesta Group: $1,130,000 2008 | Boeing Co | $190,000 2009 | Boeing Co | $200,000 2010 | Boeing Co | $200,000 2011 | Boeing Co | $200,000 2012 | Boeing Co | $200,000 2013 | Boeing Co | $140,000 Raytheon Lobbying fees paid to Podesta Group: $200,000 2008 | Raytheon Co | $90,000 2009 | Raytheon Co | $90,000

2010 | Raytheon Co | $20,000 Michael C. Ruettgers Raytheon Independent Director since 2000 Raytheon Former Lead Director 2006-2013 Ruettgers Foundation Trustee since 1997 “Donation” to the Clinton Foundation Ruettgers Family Charitable Foundation $500,001 – $1,000,000

George R. Oliver Raytheon Independent Director since 2013 Johnson Controls International PLC President, Chief Operating Officer & Director since 2016 Tyco International Ltd. Chief Executive Officer & Director since 2006 Lobbying fees paid to Podesta Group: $970,000 + $650,000 2006 | Tyco International | $140,000 2007 | Tyco International | $240,000 2008 | Tyco International | $150,000 2009 | Tyco International | $210,000 2010 | Tyco International | $200,000 2011 | Tyco International | $30,000 2007 | Tyco Electronics | $60,000 2008 | Tyco Electronics | $140,000 2009 | Tyco Electronics | $210,000 2010 | Tyco Electronics | $240,000 “Donation” to the Clinton Foundation Johnson Controls, Inc. $100,001 – $250,000 General Electric Lobbying fees paid to Podesta Group: $2,850,000 1999 | General Electric | $120,000 1999 | General Electric | $20,000 2000 | General Electric | $180,000 2000 | General Electric | $60,000 2001 | General Electric | $140,000 2001 | General Electric | $100,000 2002 | General Electric | $140,000 2002 | General Electric | $200,000 2003 | General Electric | $140,000 2003 | General Electric | $100,000 2004 | General Electric | $100,000 2004 | General Electric | $100,000 2005 | General Electric | $220,000 2006 | General Electric | $300,000 2007 | General Electric | $0 2009 | General Electric | $120,000 2011 | General Electric | $50,000 2012 | General Electric | $160,000 2013 | General Electric | $170,000 2014 | General Electric | $160,000 2015 | General Electric | $160,000 2016 | General Electric | $110,000 “Donation” to the Clinton Foundation General Electric $500,001 – $1,000,000 G.E. loves Clinton | THE CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY | MAY 24, 2016 Clinton’s largest batch of defense-related contributors, from the beginning of 2015 through February 2016, were associated with General Electric, which received contracts from the Defense Department totaling $2.2 billion in fiscal 2014 and $2.3 billion in fiscal 2013.Clinton served on the Senate Armed Services Committee during her final six years in the Senate where she also received defense-industry contributions. Adjusted for inflation, she collected $258,024 from the top contractors for her Senate campaign and leadership political action committee (PAC) during that period — 2003 through 2008 — including $125,351 from contractor PACs. BAE Systems Lobbying fees paid to Podesta Group: $3,600,000 2008 | BAE Systems | $110,000 2009 | BAE Systems | $440,000 2010 | BAE Systems | $440,000 2011 | BAE Systems | $440,000 2012 | BAE Systems | $440,000 2013 | BAE Systems | $440,000 2014 | BAE Systems | $450,000 2015 | BAE Systems | $480,000 2016 | BAE Systems | $360,000 Textron Lobbying fees paid to Podesta Group: $3,460,000 1998 | Textron Inc | $200,000 1999 | Textron Inc | $240,000 2000 | Textron Inc | $200,000 2001 | Textron Inc | $200,000 2002 | Textron Inc | $80,000 2003 | Textron Inc | $80,000 2004 | Textron Inc | $80,000 2005 | Textron Inc | $80,000 2006 | Textron Inc | $120,000 2007 | Textron Inc | $160,000 2008 | Textron Inc | $190,000 2009 | Textron Inc | $240,000 2010 | Textron Inc | $240,000 2011 | Textron Inc | $200,000 2012 | Textron Inc | $200,000 2013 | Textron Inc | $200,000 2014 | Textron Inc | $200,000 2015 | Textron Inc | $280,000

2016 | Textron Inc | $270,000 United Technologies “Donation” to the Clinton Foundation United Technologies Corporation $25,001 – $50,000 Lobbying fees paid to Podesta Group: 2010 | United Technologies | $270,000 2011 | United Technologies | $240,000 United Technologies sold China software for attack copter | USA TODAY | JUN 28, 2012 In June 2012, United States charged Hamilton Sundstrand, its parent company United Technologies, and Canadian affiliate Pratt & Whitney Canada, of selling engine control software to China, which aided in the development of the CAIC Z-10. UTC, Hamilton Sundstrand, SolarReserve Hamilton Sundstrand, a subsidiary of United Technologies Corporation, was an American globally active corporation that manufactured and supported aerospace and industrial products for worldwide markets.On 2 January 2008, Hamilton Sundstrand announced it would commercialize the concentrated solar power tower technology and corresponding molten salt storage system developed by Rocketdyne through a new entity known as SolarReserve. The very next year, SolarReserve hired the Podesta Group. Lobbying fees paid to Podesta Group: $1,510,000 2009 | SolarReserve | $180,000 2010 | SolarReserve | $180,000 2011 | SolarReserve | $200,000 2012 | SolarReserve | $200,000 2013 | SolarReserve | $200,000 2014 | SolarReserve | $200,000 2015 | SolarReserve | $200,000

2016 | SolarReserve | $150,000 Professional Services Council Lobbying fees paid to Podesta Group: $1,690,000 2007 Professional Services Council $40,000

2008 Professional Services Council $310,000

2009 Professional Services Council $170,000

2010 Professional Services Council $110,000

2011 Professional Services Council $170,000

2012 Professional Services Council $280,000

2013 Professional Services Council $280,000

2014 Professional Services Council $120,000

2015 Professional Services Council $120,000

2016 Professional Services Council $90,000

“If” – Stuttering Obama Remix featuring Trump | YOUTUBE | JUN 29 2016



Obama: If You’ve Got A Business, You Didn’t Build That | YOUTUBE | JUL 16 2012

Joe the Plumber and Mr. Obama – spread the wealth around | YOUTUBE | SEP 28 2013

“If you like your plan, you can keep your plan.” – Barack Obama | YOUTUBE | JUL 5 2013

Bill Clinton is a rapist | INFOWARS | OCT 5 2016