Oceans of corn would be dotted with islands of native plants. Homeowners would have fewer lawns — and a lot less mowing. Roadsides would grow thick with grasses and flowers. And more than a billion unruly milkweed plants would pop up along a 200-mile-wide corridor along I-35 from Duluth to Texas.

That’s the ambitious vision buried in a national pollinator plan released recently by the White House — an epic attempt to save the gaudy symbol of the prairie from its steady slide toward the Endangered Species list. The key is milkweed, the one and only food source for monarch caterpillars, which has all but disappeared from Midwestern landscapes, thanks largely to GMO crops and the widespread use of Roundup.

But if it succeeds, the plan would rescue pollinators considered vital to a healthy environment, and in five years the number of monarchs that travel 3,000 miles every year from the Midwest to the mountains of Mexico and then back again, would increase by nearly tenfold.

“We are going to get the most bang for our buck by concentrating on the prairie corridor,” said Karen Oberhauser, a University of Minnesota professor and one of two key scientists advising federal agencies on the monarch plan.

And monarchs won’t be the only ones to benefit. “It’s a flagship species for a lot of other critters that will enjoy that habitat,” said Tom Melius, director of the Midwest region for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, which is leading the monarch restoration plan. That includes grassland birds, which are also disappearing from the landscape, and pollinators of all kinds, he said.

Graphic: Monarch highway Graphic: Monarch highway

A crash in numbers

Monarchs earned a place in the White House pollinator plan in part because they are wildly popular, and because they have an extraordinary migration that makes it easy to measure their shocking decline.

In January this year, monarchs covered about 2.8 acres of trees in Mexico, their primary overwintering site, where they droop from the branches in great fluttering clusters through the cold months.

That’s better than the all-time low of 33 million butterflies spread over 1.6 acres, in 2014. But their numbers have crashed since the mid-1990s, when they covered 30 to 40 acres of acres of trees every winter. The trend is so alarming that last year a number of environmental groups petitioned the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to put the butterfly on the federal Endangered Species list, which the agency is now considering.

Scientists have cited a number of reasons for the decline. For a time, logging in and around Mexico’s mountain forests deprived them of critical winter protection, but that’s been largely stopped. Now their numbers are so low that there’s room to spare in the mountains.

Climate change and the severe weather events it brings, like drought and flooding, can wipe out the milkweed plants that monarchs need to lay their eggs and the flowers they need for nectar throughout their migration route.

Pesticides may also play a part — chief among them a class known as neonicotinoids that are now embedded in virtually all row crops planted across millions of acres. A recent study by the U.S. Department of Agriculture found that milkweed growing near farm fields absorbed the pesticide, most likely from the soil. And 50 to 80 percent of the monarch eggs on contaminated plants died before or soon after hatching.

But the biggest reason, scientists say, is that between Duluth and Texas there’s just not much milkweed anymore.

Farmers used to pull the plant out with machines when they cultivated the rows, and year after year it would simply grow back. But in the 1990s, Monsanto revolutionized Midwestern agriculture with seeds resistant to the herbicide Roundup, and now the widespread use of that combination means that most row crops are, for the most part, completely bare of all weeds.

A 2012 study by Oberhauser and John Pleasants, a scientist at Iowa State University, showed the consequences for monarchs: Half the milkweed in the corn belt disappeared between 1999 and 2010.

“Milkweed densities were not all that great in soybean and cornfields,” Pleasants said. “But there were so many corn and soybean fields that when you added it all up it was a huge amount.”

Not anymore.

The number of eggs that monarchs produce took an even greater hit, declining 81 percent during that same period. Turns out, the milkweed plants inside farm fields were more important to the butterflies than those outside. The monarchs laid four times as many eggs on milkweed plants in farm field plants than on those growing in pastures or roadsides. The scientists weren’t sure why — maybe the eggs were better protected from predators, or perhaps the farm fertilizers made the plants more nutritious.

Since then, the loss of milkweed has only accelerated as row crop agriculture has continued to expand across the country. Between 2008 and 2012, another 5.7 million acres of grasslands were converted to row crops, primarily corn, according to a University of Wisconsin study published earlier this year.

And that, said Pleasants, means the loss of about another 53 million milkweed plants per year.

225 million butterflies?

Monarchs complete almost all of their growth during the larval stage, which lasts 9 to 14 days in normal summer temperatures.

Bringing milkweed back will be a lot harder than eradicating it was in the first place.

Plants lost on agricultural land will never come back, Pleasants said. So the new monarch plan calls for planting milkweed somewhere else.

Now, scientists both in and outside federal agencies are trying to figure out just how much land and how many milkweed plants will suffice to increase the number of monarchs to 225 million in five years, or enough to cover 15 acres of trees in Mexico.

Are all the back-yard gardens between Minnesota and Mexico enough? How about roadsides and utility rights of ways, boulevards, county, state and federal parks?

Wherever they find it, raising the monarch population to 225 million individual butterflies will probably require an amount of restored land equal to half of Wisconsin, said Wayne Thogmartin, a U.S. Geological Service specialist who is doing the land calculations. Almost all of it has to be in the north central region of the country, where monarchs need it most.

And it will take 500 million milkweed seeds.

“The problem is, we don’t have 500 million seeds,” he said. “And even if we did, that wouldn’t be enough.” Only one out of 100 seeds germinate, so the plan really needs “billions and billions of seeds,” he said.

Thogmartin sometimes envisions a nationwide campaign similar to the World War II effort in which kids across the country collected milkweed fuzz for pillows. This time, the kids could instead break open the pods and send the milkweed seeds floating away on the wind.

Caitlin Smith, a biologist with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, looked over a recently converted parcel north of New Richmond Wis. Once covered in trees and brush, it’s been logged and burned to bring back a flowering landscape better suited to monarchs.

But that’s a fantasy.

“It’s going to be difficult to get enough milkweed,” he said.

Nonetheless, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the USDA and conservation groups across the country are getting started. The wildlife service is looking at the land it manages with an eye toward planting pollinator-friendly habitat. The USDA’s conservation service is doing the same with farm conservation programs. Last week the National Fish And Wildlife Foundation announced it’s seeking proposals for land restoration, education, and seed production.

Will it be enough?

Scott Hoffman Black, executive director of the Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation, said the federal pollinator plan is light on funding and weak on the issue of pesticides.

Still, he says it is a significant step — if only because President Obama has ordered all the federal agencies to work together to find a way to save the monarch.

“That,” he said, “is a sea change.”





