The US announcement that it will no longer view West Bank Israeli settlements as inconsistent with international law has provoked outrage in all corners of the globe, on humanitarian, legal, and common-sense grounds.

The Trump administration’s controversial move on Monday reversed decades of US policy, contradicting numerous United Nations resolutions and international human rights conventions. In an effort to downplay the change, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said the decision came as a result of a “legal review” of the State Department opinion on the settlements from 1978, but reactions exploded both domestically and internationally.

Also on rt.com US now considers Israeli settlements consistent with international law – Pompeo

While most US politicians avoided immediately confronting the president on Israel – always a third-rail topic in Washington – Vermont Senator and Democratic presidential hopeful Bernie Sanders slammed Trump for “isolating the United States and undermining diplomacy by pandering to his extremist base” in a tweet.

EU foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini renewed calls for Israel to “end all settlement activity, in line with its obligations as an occupying power,” following the announcement. An EU court ruled last week that all goods originating in Israeli settlements must be labeled as such.

Jordan’s Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi warned the move would have “dangerous consequences” on the possibility of peace in the Middle East.

Settlements in occupied #Palestine are a blatant violation of Int’l law & UNSCRs. They are an illegal action that’ll kill 2-state solution. Jordan’s position in condemning them is unwavering. We warn against dangerous consequences of US change of position on settlements on MEPP — Ayman Safadi (@AymanHsafadi) November 18, 2019

Others pointed out that aiding and abetting a breach of international law made the US complicit in Israel’s crimes. Amnesty International has deemed Israeli settlements in occupied territories a war crime.

Trump/Pompeo: “Israel’s West Bank Settlements Don’t Violate International Law.” Guess what guys? You don’t get to decide what violates international law. And if you aid and abet a violation, you become complicit. So you’re law-breakers. Nothing new there! https://t.co/3SLa5nEHBj — James J. Zogby (@jjz1600) November 18, 2019

US announcement that Israeli settlements don’t violate international law is merely a shedding of the fiction that the US has ever opposed Israel’s land-theft colonies. It changes nothing but makes clear to all that the US and Israel are partners in crime https://t.co/kYri7ZuDdl — Ali Abunimah (@AliAbunimah) November 18, 2019

“Trump can’t wipe away with this announcement decades of established international law that Israeli settlements are a war crime,” Human Rights Watch’s Kenneth Roth tweeted, adding “Trump doesn’t read, but we do,” and pointing to Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention.

Some commenters wondered at who the move was supposed to appeal to, since “US Jews massively reject Trump.” A few mused whether this might be the straw that breaks the camel’s back regarding a backlash against Israel.

This is going to backfire. The immediate result will be worldwide repudiation of #Israel's occupation of the West Bank and more specifically of the #settlement enterprise. Ultimately, the new Democratic Administration will restore the old American position against the settlements https://t.co/nTZjsGysXe — Barak Mendelsohn (@BarakMendelsohn) November 18, 2019

Others merely snarked at the mushy headlines US media used to cover the announcement.

How the hell is it possible for the US policy to be any softer?https://t.co/VPeUxd42yM — Jeffrey St. Clair (@JSCCounterPunch) November 18, 2019

Much as Trump’s decision to “recognize” the Israeli occupation of Syria’s Golan Heights, the West Bank move may be a bid to shore up the crumbling position of Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu, who still hasn’t formed a government after two elections and multiple failed attempts to build a coalition. Pompeo, however, has denied the connection.

Of course, not everybody was upset – Israeli settler leaders stepped up calls for annexing the West Bank, a controversial campaign promise of Netanyahu’s, while others demanded the territory be referred to by settlers’ nomenclature – “Judea and Samaria” – seldom heard outside Israel.

Like this story? Share it with a friend!