GOP lawmakers pushed back on Democrats' proposed net neutrality bill at a testy hearing on Tuesday, calling the legislation "extreme" and overly partisan, while saying it would be dead on arrival in the Senate.

Rep. Bob Latta (R-Ohio), ranking member of the House Energy and Commerce technology subcommittee, called the bill a "non-starter," pointing out that it opens up the broadband industry to regulations that Republicans have long opposed.

ADVERTISEMENT

"Instead of engaging with us to try to solve the problem, my colleagues have retrenched back to the most extreme position in this debate," Latta said. "[The bill] has no chance of even passing the Senate or being signed into law."

The Save the Internet Act, introduced by Democrats last week, would restore Obama-era regulations on the broadband industry.

The bill would codify the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) 2015 Open Internet Order into law, reigniting a debate between Republicans and Democrats over whether the FCC should have the legal authority to enforce net neutrality rules.

Under the Democrats' bill, the broadband industry would be classified as a telecommunications service under Title II of the Communications Act — a designation which opens up the industry to more stringent regulations enforced by the FCC.

The "Title II" designation has long been a sticking point for Republicans.

Republicans at the hearing repeatedly promoted a trio of bills recently introduced by Latta, Rep. Greg Walden Gregory (Greg) Paul WaldenTrump order on drug prices faces long road to finish line Ignore the misinformation: The FDA will ensure the safety of any COVID-19 vaccine Hillicon Valley: Trump backs potential Microsoft, TikTok deal, sets September deadline | House Republicans request classified TikTok briefing | Facebook labels manipulated Pelosi video MORE (R-Ore.) and Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers Cathy McMorris RodgersHillicon Valley: Trump backs potential Microsoft, TikTok deal, sets September deadline | House Republicans request classified TikTok briefing | Facebook labels manipulated Pelosi video Top House Republicans request classified TikTok briefing More than 100 lawmakers urge IRS to resolve stimulus payment issues MORE (R-Wash.), which would reimpose some net neutrality rules without using "Title II."

McMorris Rodgers called the bills "reasonable," while witnesses and some Democratic lawmakers criticized them as weak on internet service providers.

The hearing was marked by sharp digs on both sides, with Democrats flexing their powers in the majority while some Republicans directed their criticism toward witnesses appearing before the panel.

At one point, Rep. Billy Long William (Billy) H. LongMissouri Rep. Billy Long wins GOP primary The Hill's Coronavirus Report: GoDaddy CEO Aman Bhutani says DC policymakers need to do more to support ventures and 'solo-preneurs'; Federal unemployment benefits expire as coronavirus deal-making deadlocks Lawmaker says he urged Pelosi to auction ripped up speech for charity MORE (R-Mo.) pressed Matt Wood, the vice president of policy and general counsel with consumer advocacy group Free Press, over his organization's tactics on Twitter.

Long asked Wood, a longtime advocate for net neutrality rules, to reveal "how many fundraising emails" his organizations sent out and how much money it raised through those emails.

The Missouri Republican went on to accuse Free Press and other consumer groups of "attacking" him on Twitter over his support for "bipartisan legislation" on net neutrality.

"Quit attacking people on Twitter when we are trying to do things in a bipartisan fashion," Long said.

Fight for the Future, another group that supports strong net neutrality rules, shortly after tweeted, "Aw, thanks for the shout out."

Aw thanks for the shout out @USRepLong



Just to be clear: we're fiercely nonpartisan & we're ready to do a lot more than "attack on Twitter"



We're mobilizing the entire Web to demand that ALL lawmakers stand up for free speech & restore #NetNeutralityhttps://t.co/S8d0OxZQe0 pic.twitter.com/Ck3g0AD8Uq — Fight for the Future (@fightfortheftr) March 12, 2019

A coalition of consumer groups has started to intensify pressure on lawmakers to support the net neutrality bill, in particular focusing on the only Democrat who did not support the companion legislation in the Senate — Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.).

Rep. Mike Doyle Michael (Mike) F. DoyleHillicon Valley: Facebook removed over 22 million posts for hate speech in second quarter | Republicans introduce bill to defend universities against hackers targeting COVID-19 research | Facebook's Sandberg backs Harris as VP pick House Democrats pressure Facebook oversight board to address racist, voter suppression content Hillicon Valley: Facebook civil rights audit finds 'serious setbacks' | Facebook takes down Roger Stone-affiliated accounts, pages | State and local officials beg Congress for more elections funds MORE (Pa.), the top Democrat on the House Energy and Commerce technology panel, maintained that Democrats are interested in working with Republicans on the bill.

He slammed the Republicans for failing to "inform" their Democratic colleagues about the bills in advance.

"After being in the majority for so long, it might be difficult for some of my colleagues to recognize that they’re not anymore," Doyle said. "A better approach would be to sit down and get in touch with us before you drop bills."

Rep. Darren Soto Darren Michael SotoFlorida Democrat introduces bill to recognize Puerto Rico statehood referendum Ocasio-Cortez, Velázquez call for convention to decide Puerto Rico status Let's build a better post-COVID future than fossil fuel consolidation MORE (D-Fla.) called the bill an "opening offer," indicating that he and other Democrats are open to "amendments" from Republicans on the committee.

"We’ll have a markup so this bill’s not just messaging," Soto said, adding it is "not true" to say that there is no chance the bill will pass.

Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle expressed interest in net neutrality rules that would prevent internet service providers from blocking, slowing down or speeding up any content. But the parties remain deeply divided over how to prevent that form of web discrimination.

Doyle told reporters after the hearing he anticipates a subcommittee markup before the end of the month.

Updated at 4:32 p.m.