@Verxion - we can certainly see your point. Anything we can do that makes the subtleties more clear is helpful.

The caveat is “first, do no harm”. We have to make sure whatever change we write does not actually create more confusion. And it also has to be super short haiku for folks to get it at sight, which is always harder than a long-winded paragraph.

Apple got hauled in front of congress because of changes to their power management software. They had moved in good faith to help, but they did it so quickly that they did not think through how it might be misunderstood, which actually made sentiments worse before they got better.

Apple ultimately came up with a more refined opt-in method that resolved it, but it was surprising how a well-intentioned action at first upset their customers. So you just want to think these things through.

What you see today was actually the result of consulting with a lot of our customers to get it right.

That’s why for example, just removing the page would have actually hurt, and not helped.

Team will brainstorm some further refinements, and alternative ways to present it. We’ll plan to revise it within a week.

Thanks so much for the observations guys.

Another example of why there’s more to fielding new tech than just assembling parts.