denied my refusal of the U.S. District Court to allow me to file a Motion to Modify that Restraining Order and (ii) the refusal of the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia to rule upon my Yesterday, Chief Justice Robertsmy Application to be relieved from the Restraining Order which prohibits me from releasing any of the D.C. Madam Jeane Palfrey's Escort Service Records. This follows: (i) theof the U.S. District Court to allow me to file a Motion to Modify that Restraining Order and (ii) theof the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia to rule upon my Petition which sought to Order the District Court Clerk to file my Motion to Modify.





Before I simply release the records in my possession, I must exhaust all judicial remedies. Accordingly, invoking Supreme Court Rule 22.4 , I am renewing the Application with a second Justice, the estimable Clarence Thomas. I will wait to see what he says before taking my next step.





But permit me to make this observation: On January 19, 2016, I sought to be released from a "gag order" covering First Amendment protected political speech and to date -- seventy eight (78) days later -- I have yet to be allowed to even file that request in the proper court. Can anyone deny that justice delayed is justice denied in this instance?