Two months after President Donald Trump's administration released a "skinny budget" calling for wide-reaching discretionary cuts to offset a $54 billion defense boost, government officials have rolled out a $4.1 trillion spending blueprint with more meat on its proposals.

The top-line numbers were little changed from the skinny budget, as Trump is angling to cut funding to the Agriculture Department by 20.5 percent, the Labor Department by 19.8 percent and the State Department and certain other international programs by 29.1 percent. The plan would boost defense spending to $603 billion, up 3 percent from former President Barack Obama's proposal for 2018. The National Nuclear Security Administration's funding, meanwhile, would increase by 11.4 percent.

But more specific details are now available regarding what Trump plans to get rid of or bolster. Medicaid, food stamps and the Environmental Protection Agency all have fallen into the budgetary line of fire, while the proposal's call for a new family leave policy follows up on a Trump campaign promise to lend a hand to working parents.

"I think the president made some very difficult decisions, and the overriding issue is he thinks we need to make a significant investment in our military," Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said Tuesday.

Congress, of course, gets the bulk of the say over what will end up in the country's final spending plan. But for now, here's a list of winners and losers in Trump's budget.

Winner: Those Without Paid Family Leave

Trump's budget includes what the administration calls a "fully paid-for proposal to provide six weeks of paid family leave to new mothers and fathers, including adoptive parents, so all families can afford to take time to recover from childbirth and bond with a new child without worrying about paying their bills."

The policy is expected to cost up to $25 billion over the course of a decade and would be doled out at the state level through the unemployment insurance system.

Loser: Medicaid and Poverty Assistance Programs

The proposal calls for a deep Medicaid reform that would cut funding by more than $600 billion over the course of a decade, seemingly separate from but reportedly overlapping with the roughly $800 billion cut to Medicaid that comes with the House-passed American Health Care Act. An executive summary of the budget notes that the overall reform to the program designed for low-income Americans will encourage states to "prioritize Medicaid dollars to the most vulnerable populations."

The budget also calls for a $272 billion cut to the overall U.S. welfare system. Food-stamp program funding would be gutted by more than $190 billion over a 10-year period, while the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program would see a roughly $16 billion reduction.

The proposal additionally would reduce 12-month retroactive disability insurance benefits to six months, for projected savings of nearly $10 billion over the course of the next decade. And the plan projects savings of more than $40 billion over the next decade through blocking child care tax credits and earned-income tax credits for immigrants in the country illegally.

Winner: Prospective Border Agents

Should Trump get his way and his budget proposal pass on Capitol Hill, those hoping to get a job as a Border Patrol agent could be in luck. The document calls for a $300 million investment to "recruit, hire and train 500 new Border Patrol agents and 1,000 new Immigration and Customs Enforcement law enforcement personnel."

Another $2.6 billion would be funneled into Customs and Border Protection "to deploy high-priority tactical infrastructure and border security technology, including funding to plan, design and construct a physical wall along the southern border," according to the executive summary.

The Trump administration is also calling for $1.5 billion to go toward expanding detention, transportation and deportation efforts in the U.S.

Loser: Indebted Government Workers

Trump's budget does call for a reinstatement of year-round Pell Grants, which the administration hopes will incentivize students to "complete their degrees faster, helping them reduce their loan debt and enter the workforce sooner."

But it also introduces significant changes to student loan repayment, eliminating a forgiveness program for public servants and consolidating a handful of income-based repayment programs into a single plan that caps monthly payments "at 12.5 percent of discretionary income" and forgives balances for undergraduate borrowers after 15 years.

Trump's plans are projected to save about $1 billion next year and more than $27 billion over 10 years by scrapping the student loan program for government workers. Eliminating subsidized student loans would save another $39 billion over that span, according to the budget's projections.

Winner: Revenue Neutrality Fans

The Trump administration has vowed that its economic and tax plans will bolster America's gross domestic product and generate more government revenue over the course of the next decade should they be implemented, thereby chipping away at the nation's deficit.

And based on what's included in the budget, it looks like Trump's economic advisers have found a way to make those numbers line up. The administration estimates its economic policies – tax plan included – will bolster government revenues by $2.1 trillion and push America toward a balanced budget by 2027.

Baked into the numbers is the assumption that the country's real GDP – which expanded last year at a lackluster 1.6 percent clip – will hit a pace of 3 percent by 2021 and maintain that pace in every year through 2027. It also assumes the unemployment rate will drop to 4.4 percent in 2018 and flat-line at 4.8 percent between 2021 and 2027.

Loser: Revenue Neutrality Fans With Calculators

Trump's revenue neutrality claims were widely panned when details of the document came out, in part because the budget experts that drafted the bill appear to have counted the benefits of his tax plan without including the costs.

Relatively few specific details of Trump's tax plan are included in the budgetary blueprint, and the temporary – or long-term, depending on whom you ask – revenue shortfall associated with lowering personal and corporate tax rates across the board are not included in the budgetary projections.

But the good stuff – the growth boost, the newly generated revenue – is included, and economists therefore have criticized the Trump administration for essentially cherry-picking data. Former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers tweeted Wednesday that the questionable math "appears to be the most egregious accounting error in a presidential budget in the nearly 40 years I have been tracking them."

When asked about Summers' remarks, Mnuchin on Tuesday referred to the budget proposal as a "preliminary document that will be refined as we go through a process with Congress" and that "many changes" will be made.

Meanwhile, Mick Mulvaney, director of the Office of Management and Budget, deflected when asked about Summers' criticism by pointing out budgets under President Barack Obama also made what could be considered generous economic assumptions.