The Day RussiaGate ended and the BRITISH BETRAYAL of Americans was CONFIRMED…

Have we been looking in the wrong place – at the wrong country – to unearth the so-called ‘foreign meddling’ in the 2016 US election all along? If Obama administration plotted with British Intelligence to spy on & generally sabotage Trump candidacy and ultimate presidency, that’s a violation of International Intel Laws.

BY: Vachel Lindsay, Elizabeth Lea Vos, Julian Assange and Stephen McIntyre

Yesterday’s release of Peter Strzok’s texts is perhaps the most damning of them all!!!

It connects three key people critical to the conspiracy to subvert the US election, frame an innocent citizen (Trump) and then to destroy an elected POTUS.

[2]

[2.1] [2.2]

If we are right, for the first time we have FBI agent Peter Strzok interacting with George Papadopoulos & Alexander Downer, in London – on 1 August 2016, the day after the FBI probe into Drumpf-Russia started.

Back in October 2016, I proposed a theory that Papadopoulos was in fact a plant burrowed into the Trump campaign team (ditto Manafort). You can read my observations here on his movements in the UK/Europe, from March 2016 onward:

[3]

Back then (like many) my working assumption was that Papadopoulos main contacts in Europe were Russians, feeding him BS – Mifsud (the Professor) & Sergei Millian, who was IMO a Russian spy and was also an apparent source for the Steele Dossier.

My theory was that Papadopoulos, certain of a Clinton win and the rewards that would follow, was tasked to burrow inside Team Trump to set up meetings with Russians. Which is exactly what he did do – and failed.

The connection with Sergei Millian remains unexplained, but these Strzok texts, as well as a bombshell article yesterday, have put an entirely new perspective on what seems to have happened.

The core idea remains the same : Papadopoulos was a plant & knowingly so – however, it now appears the scheme was driven by a combined group of US/UK intelligence conspirators, working with Fusion GPS and by extension, the Obama administration & Clinton campaign.

Here is the bombshell article, which explains that in fact Mifsud was probably a UK intelligence asset (not Russian, as I first assumed – although I’m keeping an open mind on that):

[4]

[4.1]

[4.2]

Each of these strands of UK-tied elements of the Russiagate narrative can be substantially dismantled on close inspection. This untangling process leads to the surprising conclusion that UK intelligence services fabricated evidence of collusion to create the #TrumpRussia.

Mifsud strongly denied claims that he was associated with Russian intelligence, telling Italian newspaper Repubblica that he was a member of the European Council on Foreign Relations and the Clinton Foundation.

[4.3]

The findings from Decipher You, a collaborative initiative by @Suzi3D and myself, were also relevant in this story, giving context for Mifsud’s eclectic academic background.

[4.4a] [4.4b]

Mifsud’s alleged links to Russian intelligence are summarily debunked by his close working relationship with Claire Smith, a major figure in the upper echelons of British intelligence. Julian Assange likewise noted the connection between Mifsud and Smith in a Twitter thread….

In his thread, Julian Assange pointed out Mifsud’s connection with #Saudi intelligence.

This writer was able to confirm the identity of both Mifsud and Smith in the photograph Assange and others brought to the public’s attention.

[4.5]

There is something very odd about the Joseph Mifsud story and the role of the UK in the 2016 US presidential election:

Boris Johnson met with Misfud on 19 Oct 2017 (Politico)

[4.5a]

But who’s the guy on the right?

Misfud worked in Riyadh for a “think tank” run by the former head of Saudi intelligence, Prince Turki al Faisal. (BBC)

[4.5b]

Misfud and Claire Smith of the UK Joint Intelligence Committee and eight year member of the UK Security Vetting panel both trained Italian security services at the Link university in Rome and appear to be both present in this photo

[4.5c]

It was Alexander Downer in London, closely associated with

Hakluyt (now Holdingham Group Ltd) a private MI6 outfit, that met with Papadopulos. The FBI used AD’s statement about Misfud to open the FISA interception warrants against the Trump camp.

[4.5d]

It was former UK MI6 officer Christopher Steele who compiled the smear filled “Steel Dossier” funded by Hillary Clinton

The UK government approved of giving the Steele dossier to the Obama FBI

It was the UK government that issued a press suppression notice (DA Notice) about Steele

[4.5e]

Steele used former UK ambassador Sir Andrew Wood to funnel the dossier to the Trump hating Senator John McCain; seemingly deliberately moving the handover out of London, to Canada.

[4.5f]

UK government TV then “verified” the dossier. The reporter? Paul Wood, a reporter who has been repeatedly operated within UK military and intelligence covert operation zones.

[4.5g]

CIA Director John Brennan:

[4.5h]

Comments:

Left-Right:

F. Frattini: ITA Minister of Foreign Affairs (2002-2004/2008-2011)

V. Scotti (ITA Under-Min of Foreign Affairs 2008-2011/LinkU. founder)

Michael Cox (LSE/Chatam House)

Adam Austerfield (LSE/UK Embassy in Spain)

Joseph Mifsud

Conference on Brexit at LinkU -20March’17

Misfud, LINK, Rome, UK…

[4.5i]

This LINK, uh..

[4.5j]

The photograph in question originated here: [4.6]

Specifying that Mifsud is indeed standing next to Claire Smith, who was attending a: training program on International Security which was organized by Link Campus University and London Academy of Diplomacy.

This is incredibly significant for a number of reasons, which will be broken down piece by piece in this thread as it is in the Disobedient News article.

[4.6]

First, the training program Smith attended with high-ranking members of the Italian military was organized by the London Academy of Diplomacy, where Joseph Mifsud served as Director, as noted by The Washington Post and in Mifsud’s LinkedIn profile.

[4.7]

That Claire Smith was training military and law enforcement officials alongside Mifsud in 2012 during her tenure as a member of the UK Cabinet Office Security Vetting Appeals Panel, is not happenstance.

This took place during her tenure on the UK’s intelligence vetting panel.

Claire Smith’s LinkedIn profile confirms that she served as a visiting Professor at the University of Stirling, where Mifsud was also employed in connection with the London Academy of Diplomacy.

Smith’s LinkedIn profile:

[4.8]

Claire Smith was training military and law enforcement officials alongside Mifsud in 2012 – during her tenure as a member of the UK Cabinet Office Security Vetting Appeals Panel.

This is only the start of the indications Mifsud is a UK asset.

[4.9]

The final nail in the coffin of the theory that Mifsud is a #Russian spy is this photograph of Mifsud standing next to Boris Johnson, the UK Foreign Secretary, as reported by The Guardian.

Nine months after Mifsud was named in the Russian meddling issue.

“Another aspect of the RussiaGate claims tied to the UK includes the reported conversation between George Papadopoulos and Alexander Downer, Australia’s High Commissioner to the UK who was based in London. Downer secured $25 million for the Clinton Foundation to fight AIDS.”

“Downer is also a member of the advisory board of London-based Hakluyt & Co, an opposition research and intelligence firm set up in 1995 by three former UK intelligence officials and described as “a retirement home for ex-MI6 [British foreign intelligence] officers.”

Lifezette states that Hakluyt is “a second, even more powerful and mysterious opposition research and intelligence firm… with significant political and financial links to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her 2016 campaign”.

[4.10]

Yet another UK link to a central pillar of the Trump-Russia narrative is British music promoter Robert Goldstone, who was reported to have organized a meeting between Donald Trump Jr. and Russian nationals in June 2016.

Some have speculated that Goldstone was also involved with British or US intelligence efforts to concoct the RussiaGate narrative.

[4.11]

“As soon as his name emerged in the press, Goldstone – like Christopher Steele and Joseph Mifsud – went into ‘hiding’. Multiple press reports claimed he had done so out of fear for his safety, a claim also made about Christopher Steele.”

The UK government issued a DA Notice (a press suppression advisory notice) to the British press to suppress the ex-spy Steele’s name. Of all those swept up in the RussiaGate investigation, only the UK-linked witnesses have felt the need to go into hiding.

Robert Hannigan, former head of British intelligence agency GCHQ, is another personality of note in the formation of the RussiaGate narrative.

He resigned from his position w/GCHQ only 3 days after Trump’s inauguration….

Hannigan flew to Washington D.C. to personally brief then-CIA Director John Brennan on alleged communications between the Trump campaign and Moscow.

But why was he interfacing w/ the CIA Dir, not Mike Rogers at the NSA, which is GCHQ’s Five Eyes intelligence-sharing partner?!?

If it was not Russia at the heart of a complex operation to topple the Clinton campaign in 2016, then was British Intelligence responsible for creating false narratives and mirage-like ‘evidence’ on which the Trump Russia scandal could hinge?

Is British intelligence involvement in RussiaGate, as outlined above, the international version of CrowdStrike and former FBI figures manufacturing the #Guccifer2.0 persona specifically to smear @WikiLeaks via false allegations of a Russian hack of the DNC?

Finally, have we been looking in the wrong place – at the wrong country – to unearth the so-called ‘foreign meddling’ in the 2016 US election all along?

– Finis –

Comments:

Is Central European Initiative a Soros Org? I ask this bc Sergei Millian also has ties to Soros’ NGO & China.

So we have Papadopoulos meeting with shady characters like Mifsud & Millian after joining Team Trump from March 2016, including Alexander Downer, the Australian High Commissioner a in the UK on May 4 (according to NYT).

[5]

Papadopoulos apparently never discloses these meetings to Team Trump back in the USA, however. I find that EXTREMELY odd in itself.

Anyway, the NYT article says:

‘About three weeks earlier, Mr. Papadopoulos had been told that Moscow had thousands of emails that would embarrass Mrs. Clinton, apparently stolen in an effort to try to damage her campaign..’

So, early April. Yes, that’s when Papadopoulos met the shady characters.

Interestingly, the NYT article says that Mifsud gave Papadopoulos the Clinton gossip in ‘late April’. Whatever, the story is Papa told Downer that on 4 May while drunk (yeah right).

Then Downer didn’t tell anyone, apparently, until two months later (July). Another thing that’s quite odd, as Downer was a great friend of the Clinton’s and also he knew Papadopoulos was part of Team Trump.

But he told no-one.

Again, sure, that sounds believable. NOT!

From the NYT:

‘But two months later, when leaked Democratic emails began appearing online, Australian officials passed the information about Mr. Papadopoulos to their American counterparts..’

Remember, this BS has been invented AFTER the fact to cover up the crime.

And hey presto, in early August our heroes at the FBI dispatch Peter Strzok, noble defender of the Republic, to ‘interview’ ‘George’ and someone at the oldest continuously staffed embassy in London.

Australia House. Wonder who it was?

Now Papadopoulos didn’t leave the Trump team, until at least mid-late September 2016.

This means the rogue FBI crew KNEW Papadopoulos was on the Trump campaign team the whole time, from at least August 1 to when he left.

I have no doubt that Comey’s crooks were spying on Team Trump – and also that they had Papadopoulos, a plant, wired up.

Another thing that causes concern.

Robert Mueller.

If you go to his Statement of Offense in the Papadopoulos indictment, you will find absolutely no reference to ‘the Professor’ being a UK Intel asset, not to the FBI investigation, not to the meeting with Strzok, not to the meeting with Downer.

Nothing. It’s all ‘Russia’.

But Mueller MUST have known all this, unless he was totally incompetent. It seems inconceivable to me that George could have hidden it while being questioned by experienced FBI agents. He’s just not that smart.

So why no mention at all of these things in the indictment?

It seems strange. But don’t throw Mueller under the bus quite yet.

Let’s return to Peter Strzok.

Here’s a thing many aren’t aware of. How long did Mueller keep Strzok on his team?

He was appointed in early/mid July 2017.

[6]

He was gone within 6 weeks. Why?

Official story – the OIG (Horowitz) gave Mueller the texts between Strzok & Page.

Likelier story – Mueller has been working with Horowitz, from the moment his SC started. And knew ALL about Peter Strzok.

Mueller firing the crook made it MUCH easier to demote Strzok within the FBI. Remember, Andrew McCabe was in charge at that time (amazing isn’t it?). He was hardly going to fire or demote Strzok, was he?

And the MSM were hardy going to object to their hero Bob Mueller.

That’s how I’m seeing it. To demote Strzok within the FBI, Sessions and Horowitz used Mueller. A plan Mueller is fully part of.

But what about the indictment?

Again, Mueller may not want to show his hand about what he knows – and is really investigating. By indicting Papa on ‘muh lying’ charges and getting the guy to co-operate on a plea deal, he can investigate everything Papadopoulos was up to with all the key actors.

Such as Mifsud, Millian, Steele, Simpson, Downer.

What Papadopoulos was offered to help Hillary & Obama in their wretched sedition.

Others, we may not know of.

And of course, Peter Strzok. On 1 August, in London.

ADDENDUM :

[7]

[7.1]

THREAD: some context on Strzok meetings in London on Aug 2, 2016.

on July 29, Strzok asked Lisa if she had discussed “new case” with McCabe.

On Sat Jul 30, ignorant Lisa Page summarizes Russian literature, music and art (Tolstoy, Dostoevsky, Tschaikovsky, Shostakovich,,,,) as “couple of good writers and artists”. Strzok wonders if his mistress can arrange to go to London with him.

On Sun July 31, Strzok sent notorious email that “damn, this feels momentous. Because this matters”. He’s then headed towards London meetings, almost certainly about supposed Trump collusion.

On Mon Aug 1, Lisa informed Strzok that McCabe had arranged POC [point of contact with US government] in London when he needed it.

On Tue, Aug 2, Lisa inquired at 12:04 UTC about Strzok’s morning meeting. Details redacted. Lisa was impressed though: “Whoa.” She reminded Strzok to make sure he can “lawfully” conceal (“protect”) information from congress, FOIA. Strzok wasn’t worried.

Aug 2 afternoon: Strzok is about to interview someone interesting – name redacted.

Aug 2 evening: Strzok sends Lisa a “lot to read”. Recalls some details from interview that he hadn’t remembered. Ponders that he needed to jot them down. Another redacted comment.

Aug 3 wee hours UTC. UK has asked that they not “disclose identities” outside the FBI, raising questions about DOJ disclosure. Lengthy redaction.

Strzok is back in Washington by evening Aug 3. Lisa tells Strzok to call “George” [Toscas of DOJ] before he comes in to FBI.

More details over next few days. Skip to Aug 11. Strzok being pestered by reporter who’s been tipped off [by Steele and Fusion] on inquiry. Strzok dumbfounded at what they are “SERIOUSLY LOOKING AT”. Points decisively (IMO) to Steele memos, not innocuous Papadop story.

Details leaked by Harry Reid from Brennan briefing (fabricated story of Carter Page meeting with Sechin identifiable in details) also points to Steele dossier

Some online speculation that “George” in these Strzok texts points to Papadopolous. This has grabbed wrong end of stick. George met with Lisa in Washington and, from other information, is George Toscas of DOJ, who is mentioned frequently as coordinating with FBI.

George Toscas had important cameo in election. He caught McCabe trying to slow-walk Weiner emails until after election (without even telling Comey). He made McCabe tell Comey, who got rattled by subterfuge and made famous announcement.

Returning to narrative on August 3. Strzok had 4:00 pm meeting which was “Not Helpful”. Text times appear to be UTM (-4) i.e. text is at 5:38 pm EDT.

Thu Aug 4 – texts anomalously silent (only 2). What’s missing? Strzok reported in early AM that briefing of Bill [Priestap] went well.

On Thu evening (remember UTM times), Strzok and Lisa discuss whether Strzok should go to Friday meeting. Lisa discourages him on grounds that meeting is not important.

Thu evening Aug 5: Strzok and Lisa discuss classic bureaucratic turf war – which agency gets to bring more people to meeting and who goes to who. Meeting is prob DOJ. Strzok worries that they will have more people, who will sit and take notes. Thinks about rescheduling.

Fri Aug 5 morning (UTM-4 hrs): Strzok’s meeting, presumably reporting on London, now has over 10 people, incl FBI General Counsel James Baker and 4 OGC [Office of General Counsel] attorneys

Fri Aug 5 2:30 pm: Strzok reports that meeting with lawyers went “well, best we could have expected”. REDACTED told him that “the White House is runnin this” (!!!). A very early appearance of White House which supposedly stayed out of FBI investigations. Lisa mentions email

Would be interesting to see Lisa’s email saying “otherwise” i.e. that White House not running this. Strzok goes to meet boss Bill [Priestap] ~5 pm, who was “FREAKING out”, perhaps about their earlier meeting with [DOJ].

Sat Aug 6. mostly unrelated, complain about FBI email system. Strzok gives Lisa some advice on what to say to McCabe, described as having “limited bandwidth” about a really bad memo. Sir Humphreyesque: “l’m not sure l found that as compelling as you did”,

reading Strzok-Page texts as a whole, there are a LOT of texts about career advancement. Here Strzok carries a grudge because his then supervisor Giacalone appears to have cost Strzok 5 months of posting at a higher job rating because he was busy on other matters.

after griping about Giacolone, there is notorious Aug 6 exchange in which Lisa tells Strzok “maybe you’re meant to stay-where you are because you’re

meant to protect the country from that men”. Strzok back from London only 3 days before.

the two lovers are text quiet through Sunday day Aug 7. Only two peripheral texts.

‘

Mon Aug 8. Prep for Aug 10 White House session: internal joint cyber piece for Comey, scenesetter for REDACTED. A REDACTED “directed all the cyber info be pulled” . Didn’t make sense to Strzok who let Bill [Priestap] and Jim [Baker?] hammer out first.

Mon Aug 8. sparse texts here,

aft: Lisa talking to REDACTED about Strzok.

11:30 pm: Strzok worries about Trump becoming president. “right? Right?!”

Early morning Tuesday (6 am), Lisa asks about Trump comment.

TO BE CONTINUED….

SOURCES:

[1] Twitter – Vachel Lindsay

[2] Twitter – Vachel Lindsay

[2.1] Twitter

[2.2] UK.Embassy

[3] Twitter – Imperator Rex

[4] Twitter – Vachel Lindsay

[4.1] Twitter – Elizabeth Lea Vos

[4.2] Disobedient Media

[4.3] ZeroHedge

[4.4a] Decipher.you.com

[4.4b] Disobedient Media

[4.5] Twitter – Julian Assange

[4.5a] Politico

[4.5b] BBC archive link

[4.5c] Univ of Stirling archive link

[4.5d] News.com.uk

[4.5e] IBTimes

[4.5f] FoxNews

[4.5g] BBC

[4.5h] Twitter – WikiLeaks

[4.5i] NYTimes

[4.5j] Washington Post

[4.6] GeoDiplomatics archive link

[4.7] Washington Post archive link

[4.8] Linkin – Claire Smith

[4.9] Disobedient Media

[4.10] ZeroHedge

[4.11] Twitter Kyle Olbert archive link

[5] NYTimes

[6] CNN

[7] Twitter – Vachel Lindsay

[7.1] Twitter – Stephen McIntyre