Politico reports on another anti-gun Bloomberg client group, this one called MomsRising.

From the actual history of the gun controls Bloomberg and his clients want, it might as well be called “Mom’s For Murder.” After all, here is the United States homicide rate from 1885 to 2011, documenting the rise in murder rates after each and every restrictive gun law – and after 1992 each and every permissive gun law:

Politico reports the president of this pro-homicide group thinks they will be able to swing the 2014 elections for the gun ban people. Briefly quoting the Politico report linked above:

Next week, members of MomsRising will go to Capitol Hill with their children dressed in cow costumes to deliver small cow toys to Senators with the message that they should not be “cowed” by the gun lobby and to get “moo-ving” on gun policy. Last February, they roamed the halls of the Hill with a children’s choir. For the July 4th holiday, another group called Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America is marching in parades across the country. “We have found that most politicians do listen when moms and children speak, and that they do take time out to hear the stories and to look at the messages,” Rowe-Finkbeiner said.

Of course, these Bloomberg clients have a single weakness. The facts. As is my habit, I left a brief outline of the facts at the Politico website. Here is what I posted with the addition of links to the source of the data mentioned:

In the 518 year history of gun control there have been more than 65,000 restrictive gun laws. More than 22,500 of those laws are still in force. Of those laws, not even one has ever reduced violent crime or murder rates. Over the past century, 341 permissive gun laws have been put in place. 12 of those have been “repealed by conquest,” leaving 319 permissive gun laws still in force. Of those, 319 have resulted in very much lower violent crime and homicide rates. Since 1992, 34 American States have enacted permissive gun laws. The Bureau of Justice Statistics “2011 Crime Victimization Survey” says violent crime declined by 75% between 1992 and 2011. Over the same period, the FBI’s 2011 Uniform Crime Report says our serious violent crime rates have dropped by essentially half. And the United Nations Global Survey on Homicide for 2011 says our homicide rate has dropped from 28th to 102nd place in the world between 1992 and 2011. Add the results of permissive laws across the rest of the world to the results from the United Sates and the fact based conclusion is inescapable. Permissive gun laws save lives, while restrictive gun laws kill. Now, ladies, tell me what restrictive gun laws you intend to repeal? Will you repeal the Chicago laws that drive murder rates to 3rd world levels? How about New York’s Sullivan and “SAFE” laws. California’s massive mess of pro-crime laws? If you do not want to repeal the laws that have driven our violent crimes sky high, we will fight you with the resources and the knowledge that fifty years of fighting pro-crime laws have given us. Because we have enough crime, enough violence, and enough political repression. We need no more.

Of course, Bloomberg’s clients claim 1.2 million members. The NRA has five million – and more than fifty million supporters. Those groups patrons are well aware of the arithmetic of gun control. And when Congress returns from its August break, our elected officials will have done their homework as well.

It is again time for you and I to pick up our telephones and tell Representative Smith and Senator Jones just how we feel about gun control. And about the massive increases in violent crime gun control ushers in. Because a word now may very well save much worse later.

Stranger