I received an email today from a reader who generously shared some Lewandowsky related news on the climate front. As you know, I haven’t exactly been energetic in my posting. I’m rather disgusted with climate science and while I still read regularly, I don’t seem to be able to find the energy to actually give a crap about what the leftist Climate Science(TM) crowd says. Still, I can be dragged from my grumpy shell. Here is the article of interest, written by these luminary visionaries – bork!!

.

In short, Stephan Lewandowsky has published yet another piece of fake science, using yet more government money, stolen from productive free-market minions, for purposes of bashing on those of us who can read a graph. AKA, climate skeptics. At this point, even other leftist scientists like Dr. Ivar Giaever are bailing out of the climate science wagon. You have to be a shill or a moron to not understand that climate science is a scam at this point. Not that it stops the ever-less relevant Real Climate guys from diving on the constant grenades to cover the scam.

.

Here is Steve’s real funding disclosure for his fake paper:

The first author was supported by a Discovery Outstanding Researcher Award from the Australian Research Council during

part of this research, and he has been supported by a Wolfson Research Merit Award from the Royal Society since 2013. In

addition, the research was supported by internal funding from the University of Bristol and the University of Western Australia.

The remaining authors have no funding to report.

I literally cannot imagine living in a world where the likes of Stephan Lewandowsky receive “outstanding researcher awards” (lc intended). The man is the lowest form of life on this planet as history will certainly show. There is no value in his publication other than to slander those who disagree with him. Intellectually, and mathematically he doesn’t reach the kneecaps of the majority of readers of this blog and the man has reached high fame by slandering our group.

.

Anyway, I replied to the email as follows:

I’m trying to make myself care about this. Lew is a leftist political hack who will never give up. Cook is tagging along with a moron, so what does that make him. I read/skimmed most of the article because I found myself fogging out after a few paragraphs. How does a “journal” publish something like that? How do “scientists” take it seriously? It ain’t much like engineering.

Publish away Lewie. No matter how extreme you are, you cannot stop basic observation which contradicts theory.



