Spider-Man movie, but star Tom Holland was recently filled in. Of course, he knows better than to share any details... now!



The British actor has built something of a reputation for spoiling or hinting at plot details during interviews, but while speaking to HeyUGuys on the red carped of his new Pixar movie Onward, he managed to refrain from spilling any beans. However, Holland did reveal that he had his pitch meeting with the studios a couple of weeks ago, and now "knows everything" about the follow-up to Spider-Man: Far From Home.



The interviewer does attempt to get a reaction by name-dropping The Sinister Six, but to no avail.







“I know everything now. I had my big pitch meeting with Marvel and Sony about two weeks ago and I know all the secrets. But I’ve also done about a thousand interviews so I know how not to spoil a movie anymore!"



We didn't even learn the title of Far From Home until June of 2018 so we likely have another while to go until some official details on the third Spidey movie come our way. In the meantime, let us know what you hope to see from the movie in the comments, and check out our rankings of all previous big screen Spider-Man adventures below.



Simply click the next button below!

The Amazing Spider-Man 2



Marc Webb's TASM sequel really is a mess. While the first movie definitely has its share of problems, the follow-up basically took all of the elements that didn't work - annoying, "cool" Peter, overstuffed plot, awful villains - and amplified them.



To be fair, leads Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone do their best with the material and Gwen's demise is well handled, but by that point we've already sat through over 2 hours of increasing silliness, cliched romance and Jamie Fox's Electro. We still know very little about Marvel and Sony's plans for the thirdmovie, but star Tom Holland was recently filled in. Of course, he knows better than to share any details... now!The British actor has built something of a reputation for spoiling or hinting at plot details during interviews, but while speaking to HeyUGuys on the red carped of his new Pixar movie, he managed to refrain from spilling any beans. However, Holland did reveal that he had his pitch meeting with the studios a couple of weeks ago, and now "knows everything" about the follow-up toThe interviewer does attempt to get a reaction by name-dropping The Sinister Six, but to no avail.We didn't even learn the title ofuntil June of 2018 so we likely have another while to go until some official details on the third Spidey movie come our way. In the meantime, let us know what you hope to see from the movie in the comments, and check out our rankings of all previous big screen Spider-Man adventures below.Marc Webb'ssequel really is a mess. While the first movie definitely has its share of problems, the follow-up basically took all of the elements that didn't work - annoying, "cool" Peter, overstuffed plot, awful villains - and amplified them.To be fair, leads Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone do their best with the material and Gwen's demise is well handled, but by that point we've already sat through over 2 hours of increasing silliness, cliched romance and Jamie Fox's Electro.

Spider-Man 3



Many of you were probably expecting this to take worst place, but Sam Raimi's Spider-Man 3 is not quite as bad as its reputation suggests.



Sure, it's tonally all over the place Topher Grace's Venom is... not very good, but Kirsten Dunst gives arguably her best performance of the trilogy as MJ, and there are some well executed action sequences.



Then there's the dancing. Okay, there's no defending the dancing. Many of you were probably expecting this to take worst place, but Sam Raimi'sis not quite as bad as its reputation suggests.Sure, it's tonally all over the place Topher Grace's Venom is... not very good, but Kirsten Dunst gives arguably her best performance of the trilogy as MJ, and there are some well executed action sequences.Then there's the dancing. Okay, there's no defending the dancing.

The Amazing Spider-Man



Sony and Marc Webb's first Spider-Man reboot is technically a well made film and Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone make for likable enough leads, but it's basically a complete rehash of Raimi's first movie - and it falls way short.



Peter Parker being re-imagined as a cool skateboarder kid would have been forgivable if the script took a few chances and skipped over the origin story, but at the end of the day it's a copy-and-paste job with a subplot involving Peter's parents that goes nowhere, and a truly horrendous looking villain.



Not bad, but not quite good enough to justify its existence. Sony and Marc Webb's firstreboot is technically a well made film and Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone make for likable enough leads, but it's basically a complete rehash of Raimi's first movie - and it falls way short.Peter Parker being re-imagined as a cool skateboarder kid would have been forgivable if the script took a few chances and skipped over the origin story, but at the end of the day it's a copy-and-paste job with a subplot involving Peter's parents that goes nowhere, and a truly horrendous looking villain.Not bad, but not quite good enough to justify its existence.

Spider-Man: Far From Home



I know I'm going to be in the minority on this one, but I thought Far From Home was just okay, and I left the theater quite disappointed. It's a fun movie for the most part and Tom Holland once again does a stellar job as Peter Parker, but I was never fully engaged with the story.



It's basically a high-school romance with some superhero stuff thrown in, and that's fine... to an extent. A couple of scenes with Peter and MJ awkwardly flirting is endearing, but it soon becomes a little tedious - even if the actors do have strong chemistry.



Unfortunately, the action sequences are also very repetitive with continuous shots of Spidey swinging around giant CGI monsters as they destroy a few buildings. We're told that these Elementals represent a major threat to the world, but that never comes across and the movie, in general, lacks bite. The final set piece is undeniably impressive, however.



Perhaps my biggest gripe with the film is that it feels like a step backwards for Spider-Man. Or a step to the side, at least. After having fought alongside The Avengers, stopped The Vulture and helped defeat Thanos and reverse The Snap (sorry, "The Blip"), this movie takes a still ridiculously inept Parker right back to the beginning and basically repeats his Homecoming arc to the letter.



I'm a big Spider-Man fan, I guess I've just had enough of Spider-Boy at this stage. I know I'm going to be in the minority on this one, but I thoughtwas just okay, and I left the theater quite disappointed. It's a fun movie for the most part and Tom Holland once again does a stellar job as Peter Parker, but I was never fully engaged with the story.It's basically a high-school romance with some superhero stuff thrown in, and that's fine... to an extent. A couple of scenes with Peter and MJ awkwardly flirting is endearing, but it soon becomes a little tedious - even if the actors do have strong chemistry.Unfortunately, the action sequences are also very repetitive with continuous shots of Spidey swinging around giant CGI monsters as they destroy a few buildings. We're told that these Elementals represent a major threat to the world, but that never comes across and the movie, in general, lacks bite. The final set piece is undeniably impressive, however.Perhaps my biggest gripe with the film is that it feels like a step backwards for Spider-Man. Or a step to the side, at least. After having fought alongside The Avengers, stopped The Vulture and helped defeat Thanos and reverse The Snap (sorry, "The Blip"), this movie takes a still ridiculously inept Parker right back to the beginning and basically repeats hisarc to the letter.I'm a big Spider-Man fan, I guess I've just had enough of Spider-Boy at this stage.

Spider-Man: Homecoming



This second reboot fully integrated Spider-Man into The MCU, taking the character back to basics for a light-hearted, John Hughes-inspired high-school adventure that doesn't quite reach the heights of Raimi's first two films, but comes pretty damn close.



Tom Holland is terrific as a younger take on Peter Parker, and he's bolstered by a strong supporting cast that includes Zendaya, Maria Tomei and Michael Keaton. Robert Downey Jr's extended cameo as Tony Stark came in for some backlash, but there's no denying that his presence gives this latest Spidey flick a much-needed injection of originality - as does the decision to dispense with Peter's origin story.



A little more edge wouldn't have been unwelcome, however. This second reboot fully integratedinto The MCU, taking the character back to basics for a light-hearted, John Hughes-inspired high-school adventure that doesn't quite reach the heights of Raimi's first two films, but comes pretty damn close.Tom Holland is terrific as a younger take on Peter Parker, and he's bolstered by a strong supporting cast that includes Zendaya, Maria Tomei and Michael Keaton. Robert Downey Jr's extended cameo as Tony Stark came in for some backlash, but there's no denying that his presence gives this latest Spidey flick a much-needed injection of originality - as does the decision to dispense with Peter's origin story.A little more edge wouldn't have been unwelcome, however.

Spider-Man



X-Men is widely credited with rejuvenating the CBM genre, but the success of Sam Raimi's Spider-Man most definitely ensured its longevity.



The Evil Dead director brings all of the requisite blockbuster thrills while maintaining some of the pulpy charm of his earlier films to deliver what is widely considered to be one of the best comic book adaptations of all time.



There are a few issues (as great as Willem Dafoe is, that Green Goblin suit just does not work), but for the most part, Spider-Man is about as great a big-screen debut for Marvel's web-slinging hero as one could have hoped for. is widely credited with rejuvenating the CBM genre, but the success of Sam Raimi'smost definitely ensured its longevity.Thedirector brings all of the requisite blockbuster thrills while maintaining some of the pulpy charm of his earlier films to deliver what is widely considered to be one of the best comic book adaptations of all time.There are a few issues (as great as Willem Dafoe is, that Green Goblin suit just does not work), but for the most part,is about as great a big-screen debut for Marvel's web-slinging hero as one could have hoped for.

Spider-Man 2



What can be said about Raimi's Spidey sequel that hasn't been already? Some still believe the original to be superior, but for me Spider-Man 2 is smarter, funnier, more emotional, more exciting and features more nuanced performances from Tobey Maguire and Kirsten Dunst.



Alfred Molina also makes for a terrific Doc Ock, and is involved in two of the movies standout sequences: the deliriously dark operating table massacre, and that train fight people tend to bring up once in a while.



Flaws? Well, Maguire does pull that weird face while stopping the train... What can be said about Raimi's Spidey sequel that hasn't been already? Some still believe the original to be superior, but for meis smarter, funnier, more emotional, more exciting and features more nuanced performances from Tobey Maguire and Kirsten Dunst.Alfred Molina also makes for a terrific Doc Ock, and is involved in two of the movies standout sequences: the deliriously dark operating table massacre, and that train fight people tend to bring up once in a while.Flaws? Well, Maguire does pull that weird face while stopping the train...