For the third time, Ashton Gray’s explosive 600-page exposé of CIA crimes, Watergate: The Hoax, has been CENSORED from a public forum. Although we at Chalet Books knew that the book blew the lid off of long-hidden secrets of the Deep State, and proved beyond any shadow of a doubt that the CIA framed and overthrew a sitting President of the United States, none of us foresaw the lengths to which defenders of “The Official Story” of Watergate would go to keep that fiction afloat, while suppressing the truth.

A reader wrote to us today to report that he had attempted to post in Reddit’s /r/history subreddit, linking to an excerpt from Watergate: The Hoax that is published freely here at Chalet Reports: “CIA Crimes: There Were No ‘Bugs’ in DNC Headquarters at the Watergate” (click to read).

Here, with his permission, is a copy of what he tried to post. The title of his post is in bold—which linked to the excerpt named above—followed by the text message he included with it:

Who can answer how many “bugs” were planted in DNC headquarters in the Watergate? TIL the answer in a recent 600-page exposé, “Watergate: The Hoax.” I was stunned [click to read article]

The publishers have posted excerpts from the book, so I’ve linked to an excerpt from the chapter that deals with this question in ways I’ve never seen anywhere—and I’ve read every book on Watergate I’ve ever been able to find. I sat through almost all of the Congressional hearings on Watergate. The “Official Story” never made sense to me There is no doubt that “Watergate: The Hoax” is controversial, but for the first time in the countless hours I’ve spent researching Watergate, this is the first work ever that makes all of the senselessness make “sense.”

His post never appeared, and then he received this bot-generated message:

Your submission has been automatically removed because it triggered some filters since you are fairly new. This is nothing to worry about, if your post follows the /r/history rules we can approve it for you once you message us. Here are some often made mistakes you can check on before messaging us: Is it really about history? See our second and third rule.

Have you included a submission statement in the form of a comment? When submitting link posts, leave a description. Focus on the quality, subject, authority, etc. Be the one that starts the discussion! Please message the moderators, if you believe your post follows the rules, so we can review your submission. I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

The reader writes: “Nothing about my post violated any of the rules of /r/history, and obviously it was ‘really about history.’ The whole thing seemed so ridiculous that I messaged the moderators, asking that they permit my post to appear in the subreddit. No one even answered, so after about 10 hours I messaged the most senior moderator.”

Here is the reply he ultimately got back—and, no, we aren’t making this up; it is exactly as forwarded to us, word-for-word:

We’ve decided to limit submissions about certain historical subjects which closely relate to current political developments. As always, submissions on this subreddit are limited to events greater than 20 years ago. While your submission can be historical in nature, the comments it will attract are veering too much into current politics, at the moment. These submissions make for a disproportionate drain on our limited, volunteer mod resources, which could be better allocated elsewhere. Thank you for your understanding.

The illogics in that statement are too complex and interlinking even for us to attempt to deconstruct. On one hand, it is rewarding to see someone admit flatly that the crimes committed by the CIA in Watergate “closely relate to current political developments,” because the corrupt activities of the FBI (cutouts for CIA) and other Deep-State actors against Donald Trump carry the same bloody handprints that are all over Watergate, as exposed by Ashton Gray in Watergate: The Hoax.

But to use that as an excuse to CENSOR the documented and inarguable historical facts contained in the Chalet Reports article is inexcusable and beneath contempt. It is a chilling example of the epitaph that is engraved on the headstone of every fallen nation throughout the bloody romp of civilizations, attributed variously to George Santayana or Winston Churchill, but no less true whoever said it:

“Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.”

A reasonable person would think that those moderating a forum for history or education would enthusiastically welcome the kind of historical revelations contained in a work so thoroughly researched as Watergate: The Hoax. The book contains nearly 500 citations, many of them to files of the FBI that never once have seen the light of day in any other book on Watergate, with other citations to, e.g., private papers never before published, uncovered by long years of dedicated and often wearying investigative research.

Yet this latest CENSORSHIP is the THIRD TIME a public forum has engaged in such virtual book-burning with Ashton Gray’s work.

First it was The Education Forum, the account of which censorship is told here: “‘Watergate: The Hoax’—CENSORED by the Education Forum and Wikipedia!” (click to read)

Then the information vandals who sit like vultures over Wikipedia eradicated ALL REFERENCES to Watergate: The Hoax: “Wikipedia’s Big-Brother Doublethink Brigade Censors and Bans ‘Watergate: The Hoax'” (click to read)

Now comes this third unconscionable suppression of incontrovertible facts at /r/history.

We at Chalet Books aren’t fatuous enough to think that the senior moderator at /r/history is some CIA operative out to get us, or that the moderators at The Education Forum have as their primary goal and function to CENSOR the truth about Watergate. We know that Douglas Caddy brought pressure on the moderators of The Education Forum with threats of a law suit, and Caddy unquestionably had close ties to the CIA at all relevant times. (See “Bob Woodward and Douglas Caddy: Deep State Operatives and Mouthpieces for CIA” [click to read].)

Wikipedia has its own censorship issues, covered somewhat at the article linked to above about its BANNING of Watergate: The Hoax, but anyone who believes that the Deep State doesn’t have a vested interest in the content of that site for certain topics is living in a fantasy land entirely divorced from the realities of this world.

We know with certainty that the biggest problem any of these people have with Ashton Gray’s book is this: They have no way at all to counteract the facts contained in it. The book is based on a database compiled over the course of nearly 20 years, containing over 13,000 entries from thousands of sources, fully searchable, and fully sortable chronologically. No other work on Watergate has ever come close to the depth of research and analysis that went into Watergate: The Hoax.

The facts and analysis in Watergate: The Hoax shred “The Official Story” of Watergate as though it had been put through a wood-chipper. Ashton Gray exposes the CIA-created “official” narrative as the ridiculous spy fiction that it is—including the pathetic fiction of a trench-coated “Deep Throat” hanging out in parking garages to pass deep, dark secrets to the CIA mouthpiece Bob Woodward. That drives devotees of “The Official Story” into a frenzy, because “The Official Story” of Watergate is like religion to them, and Woodward is their primary prophet. Anyone who dares to question the mythology is a heretic.

For us, we’ll go right on telling the truth, and the more others attempt to suppress it, the further the truth spreads. It is unstoppable. It penetrates all armor.

Our deep appreciation to the responsible reader who attempted to spread that truth at /r/history, and notified us of the blatant censorship. Our endless respect to all those who seek real justice, real truth, and work tirelessly to expose the lies of the Deep State and their lap-dog “mainstream” media.

Honest reviewers are calling Ashton Gray’s Watergate: The Hoax “a forensic tour de force,” “magisterial,” “brilliant,” “stunning,” and “monumental.” Buy it today. Read it today. Tell the world.

Watergate: The Hoax is available now

at Amazon, iBooks and Barnes & Noble.

Order it today!

Rewrite history with the truth!

And be among the first to buy and own Ashton Gray’s revolutionary work Created Equal: The Greatest Lie, a merciless assault on 300 years of fatuously false philosophy, psychology, sociology, and politics! Order now for only $4.99 at Amazon.com.

Available as Kindle and trade paperback; also available at other fine book retailers.

Join the new cultural revolution! Buy and read Created Equal: The Greatest Lie!