“If the trial court’s decision is not heard by the Supreme Court, the defendant’s confidential statement describing the details of the killing of her husband may be used to prosecute her in violation of Connecticut’s long-standing strong public policy of protecting attorney-client communications,” the lawyers wrote in their petition. “In the lower court, the defendant strongly asserted that because the two statements were virtually identical, authored during the same time frame and located in separate clearly labeled files in a double locked cabinet that the documents, as a matter of logic and ordinary reason, were protected by the attorney-client privilege.”