Last Train to Yuma: The Arizona 2016 Democratic Primary

Richard Charnin

March 24, 2016

Updated: March 28, 2016

Arizona 2016 is the latest poster child of election fraud, along with Florida 2000 and Ohio 2004.

Sanders won Utah (a bordering state)and Idaho primaries with nearly 80% of the vote. But he lost in Arizona by 60-38%. Who believes it?

The National Exit Pool of six major media conglomerates funds exit pollster Edison Research. The NEP decided not to poll AZ. It’s as if they knew they would have to match the unadjusted poll to a bogus recorded vote; the massive discrepancies would be too obvious.

But the networks called it for Hillary with less than 1% of the votes in. How did they know this if they did not exit poll?

Luckily the Yavapai County Daily Courier did an exit poll – and Bernie led by 63-37%. Hillary won the county by 54-43%- an impossible 37% difference in margin. But the evidence of fraud goes much further than this one poll.

These are the primaries that have been exit polled:

Primary Sanders Vote Sanders Exit Poll Difference Probability of Diff OK 55.5% 50.9% -4.6% 0.1% VT 86.3% 86.5% 0.2% 45.8% NC 42.8% 43.7% 0.9% 27.6% MO 49.9% 51.9% 2.0% 9.8% FL 34.1% 36.0% 2.0% 9.6% IL 49.1% 51.2% 2.0% 9.2% VA 35.4% 37.4% 2.0% 9.3% MI 50.8% 52.1% 1.3% 20.5% AR 31.0% 33.3% 2.3% 6.4% MA 49.3% 52.1% 2.8% 3.3% TN 32.9% 35.5% 2.6% 4.5% TX 33.7% 37.9% 4.2% 0.3% OH 43.1% 48.1% 5.0% 0.1% MS 16.6% 21.3% 4.7% 0.1% GA 28.3% 33.8% 5.5% 0.0% AL 19.8% 25.9% 6.1% 0.0% AZ (Yavapai Cty) 37.% 63.0% 36.0% 0.0%

Approximately 70% of voters were turned away because they were registered independents – and Bernie has won a solid majority of them.

John Brakey is an AZ election activist who has proven fraud. Brakey developed a spreadsheet on the primary. Sanders had 60% in the precincts, but Clinton had 60% in Vote by Mail (VBM) which comprised nearly 80% of the total vote.

Pima County (Tucson)

Hillary led VBM by 59.9-38.2%. But Sanders led the precinct vote by 59.1-39.6% at 11:20. There were 98,303 VBM but just 25,697 precinct votes.The voting machines used were ES&S (Optiscan); Premier Accuvote (Optiscan)

Maricopa County (Phoenix)

At 8pm HRC led VBM by 61.5-36.1% of 114,286 votes.Sanders led the 32,959 precinct votes by 60.3-38.8%. The voting machines used were the AVC Edge (DRE); Optech Insight (Optiscan); Optech 400C (Optiscan).

Voters had to stand stand on line to vote and are angry that the primary has been called for Hillary Clinton. The majority of Bernie Sanders’ voters have not been allowed to vote. Approximately 1.3 million voters who reportedly would have voted for Sanders were disenfranchised.

The Arizona Republic reported that Maricopa County reduced the number of polling places from more than 200 in the 2012 presidential election to 60. Arizona law effectively disenfranchises 36 percent of registered voters.

Registered Democrats who had voted in primaries before were told that they were not on the Democratic voting lists . Others who switched their party were told they were not on the list – but could vote on a provisional ballot.

The fraudsters apparent goal: suppress voting on election day and rely on Clinton’s large lead among early voters to secure a win by reducing the number of polling locations.

At 2:45 AM ET, Sanders was leading Clinton in Election Day voting in Arizona 50.2% to 49.8%, with just under 75,000 votes (about 17.3% of all Election Day votes) counted.

The media called the election for Clinton with less than 1% of the vote counted and thousands of people waiting in line to vote. Four hours after polling stations closed, hundreds of people were still waiting in line: 37% (1.219 million) of registered voters declared as independents; 34% (1.115 million) as Republicans; and 28% (932,722) as Democrats. Sanders has won a vast majority of independents in every state.

Bomb threats prevented many voters from getting the help they needed: Two hours after polls closed in Arizona, officials there had counted only 54,000 of the estimated 431,000 (12% of Election Day ballots.

Sanders has done much better in caucuses than in primaries. He has won just 4 of 21 primaries with a 41% share but has won 11 of 12 caucuses with a 66% share. There is a 97.8% probability that the difference was not due to chance.View the graph.

The Utah primary: This is what a fair election looks like: Note the parallel lines representing Sanders and Clinton vote shares.

UT Vote shares vs. Precinct Size

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sGxtIofohrj3POpwq-85Id2_fYKgvgoWbPZacZw0XlY/pubchart?oid=440801838&format=interactive

MO Vote shares vs. Precinct Size

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sGxtIofohrj3POpwq-85Id2_fYKgvgoWbPZacZw0XlY/pubchart?oid=844926264&format=interactive

Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts

Proving Election Fraud: Phantom Voters, Uncounted Votes and the National Exit Poll (E-book)

LINKS TO WEB/BLOG POSTS FROM 2004

Election Fraud Overview