RCMP Pre Employment Polygraph (PEP) Experiences



A friend of mine did a pre-employment polygraph with the RCMP in the past several weeks and he/she was outraged by the whole experience. For those wondering, my friend did Pass, but the experience has left my friend shaken and demoralized. This not some bitter or biased story; it is factual and real. It is also detailed. The following is a composite of experiences, and key details have also been provided by one or two other applicants, all who had direct experience with the polygraph and recruiting process; therefore the information below is not from just a single source.



Here is some information pertaining to how RCMP pre-employment polygraph exams are conducted:



During the instrumentation phase the subject is instructed to close his/her eyes and only think about the question or issue at hand, focusing on it, and nothing else. The subject is sitting 90 degrees to the polygrapher. The subject is also told about the sensor underneath the seat pillow (and how it detects any movements or attempts at trying to cheat the device) and instructed not to move while the questions are being asked and the instrument is running. If the topic of countermeasures is brought up then the examiner briefly states that they are very obvious on the charts, that they dont work, and that he/she has seen them in the past and can very easily recognize them right away since he/she conducted many tests.



Myth 1: There are no surprise questions asked.



Reality: This is one a total myth. Each question on the booklet that one fills out beforehand (which is publicly accessible as a pdf document on the recruiting website) is actually followed up during the test by several other previously unknown sub-questions (e.g., Have you ever ., How about , Sometimes people in these situations ). These sub-questions also involve plausible scenarios that are pushed on the applicant in such a sly away as to suggest casualness and even an attitude that such activities are common, normal, and encouraged. In such an environment of questioning (especially when it comes to all sorts of implied scenarios totally out of the blue) someone who may get confused or more easily influenced could easily start to believe that some of these, up to now totally foreign possibilities, might in fact be possible, and maybe somewhere, sometime, might have even happened. Then at the slightest admission of possibility, the interrogator will start to insinuate and probe what previously did not seem to be a big deal at all. Pretty soon the minor detail is turned over its head, and something previously simple and innocent is turned around and framed as a major activity with menacing intent. Some of the extra questions asked can also be quite personally offensive and unjustly insinuating.



Myth 2: There are no tricks employed.



Reality: There are many tricks employed. There is no such thing as a truth verifying question, baseline question, nor is there such a thing as questions used to calibrate the instrument, or any other such made up mumbo-jumbo. The only questions that do not appear in the polygraph booklet that are asked when hooked up to the machine (about 20 minutes towards the end), are either asked as meaningless buffers between real questions, or as additional specific real probes to the real main questions. If the polygrapher suspects that the applicant might be familiar with polygraphy, then all questions (aside from the neutral buffers) will be real questions, and there will be simply an overall comparison made as to which showed the greatest response. The card trick is rigged (as can be inferred by the fact that the cards are special large cards specifically made for the test by the manufacturer of the instrument, and are not in a typical full deck).



Myth3 : There are no trick questions.



Reality: There might be dirty trick questions, especially at the end. For example, if a subject were to repeatedly answer No to a drug question, but the polygrapher think that the subject is lying, then questions such as So when did you really do x drugs , or So when was the last time that you did x drugs , How often did you actually  might surface at the end when the test is supposedly over. Of course, this is a bluff and the examiner will have a smirk on his face hinting that he/she has figured things out, that he/she has caught you and that you better stop playing games and finally come clean.



The examiners sheer silliness will be showcased by the fact that he/she will claim that the polygraph works almost flawlessly each and every time, and that it detects lying with practically close to 100% accuracy (especially when he/she so proudly detects the mystery card, which supposedly only the subject is aware of); but his tomfoolery is easily revealed by the fact that he/she will NEVER show you the computer charts, even when stating that Yes, the charts show very clearly that the card you were holding is .. The reason why the test subject is never shown the charts is because the charts dont show anything, other than random patterns and supposed reactions.



Further proof usually comes at the end of the interview when the polygrapher might ask such questions as How come you were so nervous when (even when at the very beginning it was stipulated that nervousness is normal and expected in many people), Which questions do you feel that you reacted the most to the strongest to (of course after initially claiming that the charts revealed all and were very clear during the card guessing phase), etc.



Myth 4: The examiner is fair and neutral.



Reality: The examiner might use psychologically coercive interrogation methods such as stating that there is a clear lack of information on the initial forms and that he/she expects a lot more to be revealed by the end of the test, as many others have done before. Other psychologically coercive tactics might be to explicitly state that there are a very limited number of training spots and that the process is very competitive (implying that if he/she doesnt like that he/she hears, or what he/she doesnt hear, then it only takes a small negative nudge to make sure one doesnt make it through the process successfully). Periods of silence will also be used to maximum effect, as well as positive inducers such as What else , Go on , And , followed by more induced silence.



The examiner will also play games by saying such things as This test is voluntary but so it your job application, You dont have to be here if you dont want to, do you want to leave?, It doesnt look to me like you are really in the right mood (attitude) for this, would you prefer that we end it now?, Its a long way until lunch, looks like were gonna be here for a while, Yup, this is going to take a lot longer than I thought, Uh huh, it definitely looks like were going to be here for a while, etc. Some of these statements are made almost as quiet statements to himself/herself, which the subject is meant to only casually overhear.



Myth 5: The polygraph is not decisive but only one of many tools in the overall recruiting process.



Reality: This is a misleading half-truth. The polygraph examination does not use any quantitative or automatic scoring criteria. The examiner makes a report based on his/her holistic impression and the interview video is then viewed by a lower ranking recruiter, at recruiting headquarters at a later time, after which, based on the complete applicant file, a recommendation to continue with the process is either made, or a deferral is issued. Note that the Recruiting NCO is of much lower rank than the active duty polygrapher; therefore, it can be obvious how a biased personal opinion from the polygrapher can strongly influence the lower-ranking Recruiting NCOs further decisions. And the final review and hiring decision is essentially made by the lower-ranking Recruiting NCO (and not by a final review committee as is the case in modern organizations).



Otherwise, the polygraph is used to generate leads for the background investigation and to formulate future schemas for handling the application. The polygrapher will claim that he/she only submits a report and then never hears about an applicant again. In reality, the polygrapher can also personally make a call or send an email to recruiting in order to subjectively express any concerns or opinions about the candidate that he/she may have; information which has nothing to do with the specific questionnaire items that the polygraph was intended for.



In other words, if the polygrapher likes the applicant (in terms of personality and personal background) and no significant admissions are made, then most likely that applicant will go on forward and be successful. If on the other hand the polygrapher takes offence personally with the applicant for whatsoever reason, then the applicant may still go on (assuming no damaging admissions were made); however, the polygrapher will now ensure that the applicant will not be successful during the background or later stages. All the polygrapher has to do in order to make sure an applicant does not make it through successfully to the hiring stage is to personally express his/her concerns about someone in terms of subjective qualities such as personality or cultural fit. This is because all future investigative steps and suitability evaluations are very strongly influenced and coloured by the polygraphers initial report/opinions. Therefore, the RCMP pre-employment polygraph is the most biased and subjective phase of the RCMP recruiting process, more akin to a popularity contest, as opposed to any strictly objective method.



Myth 6: The RCMP polygraph interview is very sophisticated and has been perfected over many decades.



Reality: The RCMP only started conducting pre-employment polygraph interviews in 2005 and the polygraph examiner did not have to undergo one as part of his/her initial job application process. The methods used are directly adapted from private American pre-employment polygraph companies, as are most of the guidelines and general procedures. The interviewer is an interrogator by trade, and will be fairly experienced, but he/she relies on surprise, subject inexperience, gullibility, and outright naiveté. Part of the scientific rhetoric spewed by the polygrapher (standard phrases directly from the polygraph instrument manufacturer) actually reminds the critical listener that the instrument was designed with the uneducated hill-billy deep-south criminals in mind; being that what is explained biologically/physiologically is both simplistic and scientifically inaccurate. Some of the things that polygrapher says initially are outright lies, while other preliminary things are in direct contradiction to what is later said or done. Any astute observer who critically listens to what is being said the whole time, will pick up on the contradictions and inconsistencies between the early rhetoric and the later actual procedure. The overall polygraph procedure is fairly crude, and the approaches are rather overt, as opposed to subtle. Some of the interviewers line of questioning can be somewhat more skilled and subtle, but only because he/she has done many suspect interviews over many years.



Myth 7: Everything that happens at the polygraph is classified and confidential and should never be talked to anyone about (this is the prevailing view between applicants).



Reality: The only confidential parts in the recruiting processing cycle from an applicants perspective are the RPAT test items and the RMSI interview content; the first two steps in the recruiting cycle. All the waivers and forms signed during the polygraph interrogation are one sided; they are designed so that the applicant waves away all rights to confidentiality and privacy in all possible contexts, both present and future. The waivers ensure that the RCMP can do whatever it wants with the contents of the polygraph interview (including the audiovideo recording), and also allows it to share any information with any other agency or department that it wishes at any time, while leaving the applicant powerless to do anything about it. Ironically, it is the applicant who signs away all of his/her rights and privacy during the polygraph exam interrogation. There are no documents signed that prohibit the applicant from talking about his/her polygraph experience.



The reason for posting this information here is because law-enforcement forums (supported by law enforcement specific advertising and related partnerships) will almost always censor and delete such information, and will supress any public debate about the realities of the RCMP recruiting process (specifically when it comes to the polygraph). And once again, the closed-in mentality of law enforcement applicants (who simply do not know better), prohibits any real public discourse from taking place, and therefore enables non-transparent, nonsensical, non-objective, and discriminatory hiring practices to continue.



Endnote: If this is the organizational culture exhibited during the recruiting process, then one can only guess what the working culture is really like within the organization. Suffice it to say, my friend was not impressed, and is hoping that other applicants might think twice before jumping so blindly into the proverbial deep end of the recruiting pool. My friend is now considering becoming a teacher and putting her creative skills to better use.