(TeaParty.org) – Greta Van Susteren, former MSNBC and Fox News host, sparked a heated debate on Twitter recently after reaching out to investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson on her thoughts on the FCC fine print regarding “broadcasting false content.”

Attkinson responded with an emphatic statement that these rules are being blatantly violated.

Van Susteren then replied that this would be a good place to start dialoguing about how journalists can be better, but that the FCC language “puts some crooked people at risk.”

.⁦@SharylAttkisson⁩ , have you seen this (below) from FCC homepage? Words to focus on ..illegal …intentionally …distort…your thoughts? pic.twitter.com/ZweBH0DRwy — Greta Van Susteren (@greta) December 29, 2018

I think there's more than enough evidence of intentional distortion in some instances but have given up on the idea that our govt. will act on such laws or rules unless it is to certain interests' benefits and not others. You? https://t.co/iqvq3J7fdh — Sharyl Attkisson🕵️‍♂️ (@SharylAttkisson) December 30, 2018

I think at a minimum this would be good to start a dialogue about journalism and how we all can do a better job… https://t.co/ycuPnBjv54 — Greta Van Susteren (@greta) December 30, 2018

I also think this language on FCC home page puts some crooked people at risk (need solid proof…like contemporaneous notes)…and this behavior also harms all the good decent journalists out there (and there are many) https://t.co/ycuPnBjv54 — Greta Van Susteren (@greta) December 30, 2018

She also added that journalists need to set higher standards.

I think journalists should police journalism more…and give no “professional courtesy” to sloppy journalism…it hurts all of us when even one journalist is dishonest….or when even one news executive pushes an agenda on the journalists ..we need high standards for ourselves https://t.co/ycuPnBjv54 — Greta Van Susteren (@greta) December 30, 2018

We should all start w/ one thing: facts (not agenda) https://t.co/DyFAZg0CYV — Greta Van Susteren (@greta) December 30, 2018

Attkinsson then wondered if perhaps the industry was too blind to their own bias:

Unfortunately we have devolved into an industry that in some cases invests in one-sided and sometimes incorrect criticism, and unethical practices, while turning a blind eye to itself. — Sharyl Attkisson🕵️‍♂️ (@SharylAttkisson) December 30, 2018

It usually is standing up against management https://t.co/kCJgkqGwWO — Greta Van Susteren (@greta) December 30, 2018

“Makes me mad when facts are not considered ‘gold,’ whatever they may be..and when executives at news organizations do what they can to slant the news to meet an agenda (and one inconsistent w/ the facts, whatever they may be),” she wrote.

“I think these executives hurt good decent journalists and hurt American people ..facts should drive all news…and opinion shows should be driven by facts, whatever they may be,” she later added in another tweet.

The rush to get it first often leads to poor journalism ..mistakes are made when rush before you get all the facts https://t.co/7gCJhHnGd9 — Greta Van Susteren (@greta) December 30, 2018

She also made sure to note the language of the FCC rules and its implications for biased journalists:

The key word is INTENTIONAL — eg if any network executive told an anchor or threatened an anchor to deliberately slant the news, that would be horrible — if accidentally misstate, then, while not good to make a mistake, not to the level of intentional.. https://t.co/CEcIO8FSqa — Greta Van Susteren (@greta) December 30, 2018

She cited one unnamed example:

You would have to ask individual anchors/correspondents …I do know of one disgraceful effort by a network executive to get an anchor to deliberately slant the news https://t.co/xsCBkuuQtF — Greta Van Susteren (@greta) December 30, 2018

This remarkable conversation between seasoned journalists led to many enthusiastic comments:

My two favorite journalists- please work together — Andrew Denney (@1219ddenney) December 30, 2018

Come back? Where? I don’t see any place for me to go…I will only return to TV if 1/sufficient resources to do a good job and 2/ executives don’t do the unethical and try to get me to do something inconsistent w/ facts, whatever the facts might be https://t.co/xAdUFdlWxZ — Greta Van Susteren (@greta) December 30, 2018

Thank you Greta for making this point with credibility, authority, experience, perspective, audience, force of words. 💙 I appreciate your understanding of journalism & choice to share thoughts here in this medium in today’s media landscape. — DGold Radio (@dgold) December 30, 2018

Journalists who intentionally write false stories and their editors knowingly publish with intent to mislead the public should be held severally liable and prosecuted. Freedom of Speech comes with responsibility and integrity. — SandyG (@muffypih) December 30, 2018

Preach it Greta! The best keepers of journalistic integrity MUST BE the journalists of and between themselves. Sadly, no one’s listening to this antiquated ideology. It’s all about clicks and ratings – TRUTH is lost. We miss you and your honesty. — 2SS_SAC (@ScoxSheryl) December 30, 2018

ABSOLUTELY! Regardless of whether they lean-left or right. Case in point the professionally rude Jim Acosta. Shame on CNN This is why the refrain “fake news” resonates. — The Black Hand (@blackha50711355) December 30, 2018

Hear! Hear!! Bust ‘em up, ladies! — Gilbert Henry (@RandyWeeble) December 30, 2018

"journalism"

– out-do other click-bait tweets/outlandish headlines to virtue signal, push narrative, & inflate marketing click-through metrics

– blame imaginary, woke 8yr olds & anonymous sources when the story falls apart.

– call criticism an attack on the Free Press

– repeat — Dr Pepper Addict (@jer2911tx) December 30, 2018

That ship has sadly sailed long ago. No going back now. The activists have picked sides and because of that we don't know who to trust. An entire industry has handed over its credibility. — BW (@b_weishahn) December 30, 2018