One wonders what would be Haldane’s reaction if he were to know that nearly seven decades after he made that statement, the Supreme Court of India ordered a special bench to decide if a remarkable verse from the Upanishads exhorting humanity to move from darkness to light and from unreal to the real, violated secularism. The petitioner has construed the verses as a sectarian, dogmatic, religious prayer.

The problem seems to be the profoundness of Hindu dharma and the exponential increase in the quantum of cultural illiteracy in the country.

Haldane himself had observed that Hinduism is not a religion like the proselytising religions and that it is actually an attitude towards the universe which is compatible with the variety of religious and philosophical stands. If we can term a verse, asking to be led from darkness to light and from the unreal to the real, as against secularism, then tomorrow we may even call teaching of evolution as anti-secular. After all, does it not favour a Vedantic impersonal Spinozan concept of divinity and the absence of a creator god over the Islamo-Christian beliefs in a creator god?



Already, in Tamil Nadu, political parties have successfully stopped the introduction of the secular ‘BCE’ and ‘CE’ in the place of sectarian ‘BC’ and ‘AD’ as they allege the terms are – hold your breath – against secularism.



Sitaram Goel did prophetically call this kind of ‘secularism’ India’s perverted political parlance. Today, this particular brand of secularism is nothing but a fanatical hatred of proselytising religions towards India’s theo-diverse knowledge traditions that go by the name, Hindu dharma.

India as a nation and civilisation lives only to harbour and nourish this flame of diverse and pluralist knowledge and spiritual traditions – what Haldane called as attitude towards all existence that is compatible with a wide variety of philosophical systems and spiritual visions. Founding fathers of modern India, warts and all, understood intuitively this duty of the nation-state towards the Hindu nation. That would explain why the Indian Navy carries a Vedic verse in its motto and the Indian Air force, a Gita verse, and why the Upanishad verse Satyameva Jayate adorns the very emblem of this nation.



The logo of the National Council of Educational Research and Training carries the verse from Isavasya Upanishad. Problems arise because of intentional or inadvertent confusing of India being a Hindu nation with the state needing to be a secular state.

There can be no two opinions that the state has to be secular in the same way there should be no two opinions that India as a nation is Hindu, in the broadest, profoundest and deepest sense of the word.

The unfortunate identity disorder that has crept into the political psyche which blurred the difference between the two is at the root of the kind of problem that we face today, with the Supreme Court even admitting and assigning a special bench to a petition that should have been summarily dismissed with the contempt it deserves.

If at all we need anything very urgently in the curriculum, it is the need for the integration of vedic darshanas, Vedanta and Sankhya, Satkaryavada of vedic systems, Syadvada of the Jains, Pratityasamutpada of Buddhists etc, intelligently into the teaching of science, art and humanities.



This is a need that was felt very early in the history of the modern Republic of India. The report of the Education Commission, 1966, headed by eminent physicist and educationist Prof D S Kothari submitted to then the minister of education Muhammad Carim Chagla, has this to say regarding this aspect of education: