Vince Lombardi also won five NFL championships. Who cares that only two of them were called Super Bowls. It is exactly the same thing. The title in the top pro league.

Lombardi did it in the span of seven years. Is that bad? Isn’t the fact that it took fewer attempts a good thing?

Yes, there is a huge problem of vastly different eras. But I watched all those great Packer teams on TV growing up. They were fabulous and had that same never-beaten champion feel about them.

Lombardi coached many fewer games: 96-34-6, and 9-1 in postseason. But doesn’t that .728 career percentage matter?

I am not saying Lombardi is better. Look at the length of time for Belichick’s superiority and the need to get through at least three rounds of playoffs to be a champion.

I am just trying to be troublesome. Or respectful.

Also, is there a tiebreaker for Better Character?

It’s called The Lombardi Trophy for a reason.

And I am pretty sure the NFL is never going to name it the Belichick Trophy.

But I get the G.O.A.T case for Bill. It’s probably correct. But don’t forget it’s still 5-to-5 in NFL titles.