THE ABOVE VIDEO is the result of my recent research into the mysterious life of George H.W. Bush. I've dived into his connection to the JFK coverup. That's right: not the murder itself. Bush's participation in the coverup is actually far more interesting than the rumors concerning Bush and the assassination.

The evidence of Bush's involvement in the murder is rather slender. It consists of a photo showing someone who looks somewhat like Bush, standing outside the Texas School Book Depository on the day of the assassination. As you can see from my animation (pictured right) it is a fair similarity. But it doesn't wholly convince me. Photographs can be very misleading, especially blurry old photographs.

What is even more misleading is the proposal that the photo depicts someone who is watching the assassination unfold. The disputed "Bush" photo was taken well after the shooting, while police were still swarming the area around the Book Depository. But that leads us to an interesting fact: Bush was indeed in Dallas just an hour or two after the assassination. So, while we can't say whether or not it's Bush in the photo, the timing would certainly permit it. (You can view the entire photo at the bottom of this article.)

At the moment of the assassination, Bush was addressing a Republican campaign conference in the Blackstone Hotel, in Tyler, Texas. When news of the shooting arrived, Bush interrupted his remarks, saying he thought it would be improper to continue a political speech, and sat down in silence.

He and wife Barbara then headed for Dallas, arriving soon after Air Force One had departed from Love Field airport with America's newly sworn-in President, Lyndon Johnson, safely aboard. If you buy it, Barbara Bush explained that she had an appointment at a Dallas hair salon, which means George would have been in the city with an hour or two to himself.

Some might say that it looks suspicious that Bush was in front of a crowd at the time of the shooting. Almost as though he was deliberately trying to create a water-tight alibi. That suspicion might not necessarily be as far-out as it seems.

Later on the day of Kennedy's murder, Bush made a call to the FBI, about a man called James Parrott, who Bush claimed might be an assassination suspect. This man turned out to be of no interest, because—exactly while Bush was making this phone call—another man, Lee Harvey Oswald, was being arrested.

When I consulted Dr Barrie J. Ritter, a renowned specialist in criminal psychology, she was very struck by this phone call, saying: “I find the timing impressive.”

There are some other coincidences that may not be coincidental. One of the most interesting is the fact that a 1963 JFK-related FBI memo mentions a “Mr George Bush of the CIA.” Bush supposedly had no connection to the CIA until he became its director in 1976. Bush later claimed that the memo must be referring to another George Bush. There was indeed a George William Bush working for the CIA in 1963, and he categorically ruled out the idea that the memo referred to him. So who do we believe? As you'll see from my video, George H.W. Bush was definitely more than a bit of a liar on the subject of the Kennedy assassination.

This confusion may have been the whole reason the CIA employed two George Bushes: a counter-espionage tactic. Identical names make tracing individuals via documents very difficult, especially when locations and timings overlap. For instance, in my video, you'll meet William F. Buckley, a well-known conservative journalist, who was also a CIA officer. He is emphatically not the same CIA officer called William F. Buckley that worked for the CIA on assassinations in the 1960s, and later became head of the CIA station in Beirut. Sort of like having a doppelgänger. I'm sure you can imagine how useful such a coincidence would be to an intelligence organization.

12 August 2019