Supporters of “Deadbeat Donald” Trump are far more likely to have bad credit scores than the supporters of his Republican rivals, Ohio Gov. John Kasich, Florida Sen. Marco Rubio and Texas Sen. Ted Cruz.

More than 20% of the people nationwide supporting Trump have a bad credit rating, compared to just 10% for Kasich, a new survey reveals.

And while Trump supporters may look down their noses at the supporters of Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, when you look at their credit scores they’re not all that different. Trump supporters are nearly as likely to have bad ratings as Clintonistas and those “Feeling the Bern” — and are actually slightly less likely to have “good” ratings.

WSJ Opinion: Violence at Trump Rallies

No, this isn’t your father’s Republican Party.

The remarkable insight into the current political maelstrom comes not from a political or partisan source, but from WalletHub, a company that provides online personal finance information. It conducted a survey of a representative audience of 765 people across the country between March 9 and March 13.

Credit scores only offer a quick snapshot of a group of people, naturally. But marketers have found that credit ratings in aggregate are surprisingly good predictors of attitudes and behaviors, which is why lenders and even employers look at them.

According to WalletHub, about two thirds of voters have “good” or “excellent” credit scores and about one third have “bad” or “fair.” But a few details stand out from the survey.

The first is that Kasich supporters are in a league of their own. They have by far the best credit ratings, on average. Some 86% have “excellent” or “good” scores. No other candidate’s supporters even breaks 70%. Kasich’s supporters are half as likely to have bad or fair ratings as anyone else.

The second is that Donald Trump supporters are the least likely to have “good” scores. Only half of them do (49.8%), slightly behind Hillary Clinton supporters (50.7%) and Sanders supporters (51%) and well behind the supporters of the other Republicans. Trump supporters are also far more likely to have “bad” scores than supporters of the other Republican candidates.

And maybe we shouldn’t be surprised.

Trump is appealing to the angry, frustrated (and Caucasian). There’s no serious doubt that his political brand is way down market. Since time immemorial the so-called “authoritarian right” has appealed to people who feel they are falling down the scale and are desperately trying to stay out of the bottom class.

And there’s a particular spin this time around.

“Deadbeat Donald” is the first presidential candidate in history to have stiffed his creditors not once but four times using the bankruptcy laws. In total his creditors lost hundreds of millions of dollars, while Trump has allegedly pocketed billions. He frequently boasts that he used the corporate laws rather than personal ones to file for bankruptcy, but this is little more than a detail. Harry Truman famously considered it a matter of honor to pay off the creditors of his haberdashers’ store, which went out of business in 1922 following a steep recession.

Meanwhile John Kasich pitches himself as a traditional, balanced-budget conservative Republican.

The intriguing question is why even more people with really bad credit scores aren’t supporting Donald Trump as well. After all, if he becomes president, who could seriously complain if they walked away from their debts and filed for bankruptcy as well? After all, if bankruptcy is good enough for the president of the United States, why isn’t it good enough for everyone else?