New England winters are melting away.

According to an alarming new study out of the University of Massachusetts Amherst, the northeastern United States will see warmer temperatures significantly faster than the rest of the planet.

“I tell my students that they’re going to be able to tell their children, ‘I remember when it used to snow in Boston,’” Raymond Bradley, co-author of the study, and director of the Climate System Research Center at UMass, told The Boston Globe.

The study, published Jan. 11 in PLOS ONE, suggests that the Northeast will reach the Paris Agreement’s global warming threshold 20 years earlier than anywhere else in the world.

The Paris pact sought to limit the rise in global temperatures to two degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit.) Average global temperature have already risen one degree since 1880, and two-thirds of that increase has taken place since 1975. The 2 degree mark is considered the point of no return for catastrophic effects of global warming.

“The 2 C number is a global average, and many regions will warm more, and warm more rapidly, than the earth as a whole,” Bradley said in a statement.

Bradley and his co-author, Dr. Ambarish Karmalkar, predict the Northeast will have already warmed by 3 degrees Celsius as the rest of the world approaches the 2 degrees mark.

Their report follows an equally dismal prediction from June, which found that, in a worst-case scenario, rising sea levels could sink 30 percent of Boston by the end of the century.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration announced Jan. 9 that 2016 was the US’s second warmest year on record behind 2012.

“No other year had as many states breaking or close to breaking their warmest annual average temperature,” NOAA said in a statement, calling the warming “unparalleled.”

The Northeast can expect more wet winters, an increase in flooding, and many, many more 90-degree days (at least 90 a year, compared to 11.) The southwest is also expected to warm faster, while the Northwest and Great Plains will experience longer droughts and drier summers.

“Policymakers need information that is useful at the local, not global scale,” Karmalkar said in the press release.

But despite the agreement’s global attempt to curb temperature increase, a United Nations report in November found that even if countries meet their pledges, a failure to cut an additional 12 billion metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 would result in a warming between 2.9 to 3.4 degrees Celsius (5.2 to 6.1 degrees Fahrenheit) by the end of this century.

And the World Economic Forum’s annual risk report released Jan. 11 predicted that the world is now most likely to be devastated by environmental — not economic — disasters.

Boston will host the 2017 US-China Climate Leaders Summit this June.

The reports come the same week as Rex Tillerson’s confirmation hearing for Secretary of State. The former head of Exxon Mobile acknowledged the threat of climate change but stated that climate scientists have a “very limited” ability to predict the effects of global warming.

President-elect Donald Trump has been wavering in his opinion on the issue. In May he said he would withdraw from The Paris Agreement if elected, but softened his stance in November, telling the New York Times that’d he keep “an open mind.” In 2012, he notoriously tweeted that climate change was a hoax.

“While the US may choose not take action, it’s important to remember that there are great initiatives at a state level, and the rest of the world (Europe, in particular, and even China and India) are taking steps in the right direction,” Karmalkar said in an e-mail to The Post.