Re: Another thing Anderson will make her eat. Keystone.

Wonder about the use of conventional there. Most of the increase is fracked liquids which is usually considered unconventional oil production. Missing something? On Monday, October 12, 2015, Kristina Costa <kcosta@hillaryclinton.com> wrote: > Key facts: > > 1) Domestic conventional oil production increased 72 percent > <http://money.cnn.com/2015/01/28/news/economy/obama-oil-boom/> since > President Obama took office, and 60 percent from 2010 to 2014 (% change in > EIA annual bbd data > <http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/pet_crd_crpdn_adc_mbblpd_a.htm>) > 2) The impacts of climate change have grown more acute. > a. California is in the grips of a four year drought made 15 > to 20 percent worse > <http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/21/science/climate-change-intensifies-california-drought-scientists-say.html?_r=0> > by climate change > b. More than 9 million acres have burned in wildfires this year > alone - equal to MD + RI (in her book) > 3) Tar sands crude is dirtier than most domestic conventional oil > production. It is 20 percent more carbon intensive > <http://cen.acs.org/articles/93/web/2015/06/Gauging-Carbon-Cost-Fuel-Canadian.html> > than most U.S. onshore conventional oil production. We had a tar sands > crude spill in the Kalamazoo River in 2010, and EPA and NOAA will tell you > <http://response.restoration.noaa.gov/about/media/oil-sands-production-rises-what-should-we-expect-diluted-bitumen-dilbit-spills.html> > it is harder and more costly to clean up than a conventional spill. And it > causes more significant negative environmental impacts locally, producing > toxic byproducts > <http://www.nrdc.org/energy/files/tar-sands-health-effects-IB.pdf> that > conventional production doesn’t. > 4) At a time when we need to be investing in making America the clean > energy superpower of the 21st century, KXL points us in the wrong direction. > > Also attached as a Word doc without links. I'm assuming at this stage we > just want tight bullets not TPs but correct me if I'm wrong. > > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Sara Solow <ssolow@hillaryclinton.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ssolow@hillaryclinton.com');>> wrote: > >> Kristina (who is taking a brief rest) will likely be able to track that >> down >> >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Tony Carrk <tcarrk@hillaryclinton.com >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','tcarrk@hillaryclinton.com');>> wrote: >> >>> Jake and JDP correct me but I thought we had q and a on what evidence >>> came out bt then and now >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On Oct 12, 2015, at 3:40 PM, Sara Solow <ssolow@hillaryclinton.com >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ssolow@hillaryclinton.com');>> wrote: >>> >>> Thanks Tony. >>> >>> The date is 2010, and she begins that remark by saying they aren't done >>> the full analysis. >>> >>> >>> *SECRETARY CLINTON:* Well, there hasn't been a final decision made. It >>> is -- >>> >>> *QUESTION:* Are you willing to reconsider it? >>> >>> *SECRETARY CLINTON:* Probably not. (Laughter.) And we -- but we haven't >>> finish all of the analysis. So as I say, we've not yet signed off on it. >>> But we are inclined to do so and we are for several reasons -- going back >>> to one of your original questions -- we're either going to be dependent on >>> dirty oil from the Gulf or dirty oil from Canada. And until we can get our >>> act together as a country and figure out that clean, renewable energy is in >>> both our economic interests and the interests of our planet -- (applause) >>> -- I mean, I don't think it will come as a surprise to anyone how deeply >>> disappointed the President and I are about our inability to get the kind of >>> legislation through the Senate that the United States was seeking. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Tony Carrk <tcarrk@hillaryclinton.com >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','tcarrk@hillaryclinton.com');>> wrote: >>> >>>> Here is the source >>>> http://m.state.gov/md149542.htm >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>> On Oct 12, 2015, at 3:35 PM, Sara Solow <ssolow@hillaryclinton.com >>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ssolow@hillaryclinton.com');>> wrote: >>>> >>>> What are you getting this from -- what date/source? >>>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Ron Klain <ron.klain@revolution.com >>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ron.klain@revolution.com');>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >