Following on from a crisply executed Kingdom Hearts HD re-release, Square Enix now unbinds Final Fantasy X's world of Spira from the PS2's decade-old shackles, letting it find its legs on more modern Sony platforms. This remastering project ranks as the company's most ambitious to date, delivering a 16:9 HD presentation with higher quality textures, improved lighting and re-sculpted character models on both PS3 and Vita. But after all this time, has anything been lost in the transition or do both remasters unequivocally offer the best way to play these games?

Barring the tease of its infamous Final Fantasy 7 tech demo, this duo of releases marks the first time a 3D entry in the series gets the full remaster treatment. To throw adequate muscle behind the project, Square Enix enlists Shanghai-based studio Virtuos Games to tackle the bulk of the optimisation work, with the PS3 version targeting a resolution of 1280x720. [Update: There's also a native 1080p mode too, which operates without the benefits of any AA at all, engaged by setting the XMB to 1080p - there's a comparison gallery at the foot of the page. Additional: There's some discussion that the 720p mode super-samples down from 1080p, but it is definitely 720p with FXAA here - there are edges not filtered showing clear, native 720p rendering.]

Meanwhile the original team in Tokyo delves into its archives to salvage any texture and FMV assets it can from the original production, while a majority of the soundtrack - originally orchestrated via the PS2's on-board sound chip - gets a remix for the update. As a result, both Vita and PS3 are very close indeed and stand apart vividly from the PS2 side of the equation. One concession for the handheld release that bears mention is the need to run at a sub-qHD 720x408 resolution, causing minor upscale artefacts on hair and plants - but regardless the game is beautifully presented on Vita. Post-processing AA once again helps here, and in terms of overall pixel rate it still impressively stands above the PS2's original 512x416 output.

With the PS2 versions captured via HDMI with a fully backwards-compatible PS3, we're able to achieve the most accurate comparable footage from the 2001 and 2003 releases, without resorting to PC emulation. Matching the footage side-by-side down to the pixel, the upgrades on PS3 and Vita are very satisfying to witness - as you can see from the head-to-head video below. Also, please feel free to check out our 85-strong Final Fantasy X and X-2 HD Remaster three-way comparison gallery.

"The Vita version compares very favourably to PS3 visually, with just minor cutbacks to the remastered textures."

This content is hosted on an external platform, which will only display it if you accept targeting cookies. Please enable cookies to view. Manage cookie settings Final Fantasy X and X-2 HD Remaster compared on PlayStation 3, PlayStation Vita, and also the PlayStation 2 original. Use the full-screen button and 720p resolution for the best viewing experience.

First off, let's look at the major steps forward on PS3 and Vita. From the bright Besaid Island beach area onwards, it's clear water effects have received attention - delivering a different level of opacity that sees ripples react to sunlight more realistically. To match the spruced-up textures, the environmental geometry also receives minor tweaks, while cloud skyboxes are redrawn from scratch. As a result, the resolution bump reveals few rough edges or low-resolution assets; practically every wall and object gets a brand new map, with texture filtering included to reduce the garish pixel-crawl seen on the PS2 release.

Back to the small screen, and the Vita version compares very favourably to PS3 in the visual sense. All geometry is identically presented, while textures and plants are based on the same fundamental designs as PS3's remaster effort. These are dialled back in resolution to suit the handheld's limits alas - as is the quality of water effects - but the difference is only apparent once blown up to a likewise scale and not much of an issue on the portable's screen. When playing Final Fantasy X at the Vita screen's fixed pixel density, the game deserves to be held in the same esteem as the home console release, and crucially, outranks the PS2 version in image quality and asset-work.

Another major component of Final Fantasy X's design is its detailed pre-rendered backdrops - used sparingly for Besaid's inns and the pier-side hovels in Kilika village. The move to a 16:9 widescreen presentation is a huge point in the game's favour when it comes to real-time 3D rendering, but poses a problem for these particular spots. Designed to a fixed aspect ratio of 4:3, the issue with planting these on-screen with no tweaks is there will be thick borders to either side. Converting these to widescreen dimensions isn't easy, and in this case Square Enix opts to crop the tops and bottoms of those areas to allow the image to fill out horizontally. In this sense, it's regrettable that the only way to see the full image is to go back to the PS2 release.

Final Fantasy X and X-2's textures are overhauled across the entirity of Spira. Fortunately, these new assets slot right in without appearing tacked on, where the older PS2 mapping wouldn't have stood up to scrutiny. Dynamic shadows are added to characters and Aeons too. A darkened spot at a character's feet was all the PS2 could muster at the time, but now we see limbs and wings casting shadows based on the sun's position. The 2D sky-boxes used for both games, such as the distant clouds in this shot, are redrawn to better suit the resolution boost. PS3 and Vita also add embellishments such as extra flags around the Luca area. Major character models get a revamp that toes the line more closely with their looks during FMVs. The combination of post-process anti-aliasing and the lower resolution can give a fuzzy effect to hair on Vita. The impact of the PS3 and Vita's texture filtering can't be overstated. Alongside the resolution increase, the filtering reduces a pixel crawl effect that runs across the PS2's lower-grade textures at a distance.

On the plus side, static backgrounds now receive take a boost in clarity by being rendered a much higher resolution on PS3. Adapting these assets for the Vita's smaller screen resolution has also been taken into account, meaning that - while sliced and diced to fit - these smaller interior areas look crisper than ever. The same goes for FMV sequences, which are now cropped top-and-bottom logically, according to the composition of each shot, but benefit hugely from finally being seen through a higher resolution window.

Another point worth noting for FMVs: on PS3 these are running with a limited range colour scale (ranging from 16-235 on the RGB scale). This occurs even with the console set to full RGB mode in the XMB (designed to output 0-255), causing these otherwise gorgeous cut-scenes to appear slightly more washed out than intended. It's a disappointing oversight and one that's thankfully not an issue on the Vita release.

Perhaps the most technically demanding upgrade in this remaster is to the lighting. In its PS2 form, Final Fantasy X relies on simple circular spots for shadows that hold shape wherever you tread. For the PS3 and Vita versions alike, we have fully dynamic shadows appearing below a character or creature. Areas appear brighter than before too, with bloom noticeably intensified on spotlights scanning above Rikku's ship, and likewise for the lit skyscraper windows in Zanarkand.

Rounding out these upgrades is the re-jigging of character models. NPCs are largely ignored, besides a tweak to their texture-set, but leading forces in the narrative see a big tweak to their designs - and likewise for Aeons. For both Tidus and Yuna's facial features, the polygon count has been raised to a point where any obvious angles have been smoothed over, and the mapping for Tidus' accessories now adds more pop to their details.

Final Fantasy X remains a beautiful game to behold, with the original art design still shining through a new widescreen presentation. Enemies in battle are generally based off the same geometric models as the original game, though some do benefit from texture boosts - as do NPCs. Also curious is the removal of the PS2's depth of field effect. Water effects have been massively improved in the revamp, and assets for Besaid Island's plant-life are used more liberally to create a fuller look around its jungle areas. Particle effects in battle remain unaltered in this HD remaster, though alpha for waterfalls sees an improvement. We also see instances of lost detail from the PS2 version, such as the rubble marks beneath each enemy in the background. A long view of Djose temple shows sharp corners have been rounded off the building's front - something that goes for many of the game's major areas.

However, some of the changes take creative license, giving the impression of a Hollywood makeover; noses and chins are thinned, while eye-lines are made sharper across the board. It's a change which may impact the nostalgic appeal of this remaster for some, but on the whole the characters now look closer to what we'd expect of a PS3 Final Fantasy release. This jump in detail does draw attention to its animation system however, where in some cut-scenes the characters need to pivot on the spot before making a run. The lip-syncing also goes without any touch-ups from its original state - an area in which Square Enix has improved greatly through its authentic voice-work in the Kingdom Hearts series.

The visual turnout for this remaster is nevertheless a strong one, and the performance figures bear this out as well. The Vita release is undoubtedly the straggler of the three, with obvious dips when too many members of the main cast appear on-screen concurrently. It's a v-synced game much like the original release, meaning the renderer switches between increments of 20 and 30fps when pressed in these scenarios - but in the main it holds at 30fps for most dungeon areas and regular battles.

From our tests so far, the PS3 release has relatively little trouble hitting this 30fps target by comparison. We get close to perfect frame-rates here, barring the odd hiccup during the opening Zanarkand chaos, which sets a precedent when compared to the PS2's issues during alpha-heavy boss battles. For overdrive moves that rely on careful timing, it's a refreshing change to have no slowdown impact our controller's response - though this is the only point where playability is ever truly affected.

"The PS3 is the only version capable of holding a perfect 30fps, barring the odd hiccup during the opening Zanarkand area."

This content is hosted on an external platform, which will only display it if you accept targeting cookies. Please enable cookies to view. Manage cookie settings A performance analysis of the PS3 and Vita versions, with a rare look back at metrics of the original PS2 release. Of the three, it's the Vita version that struggles the most - especially in the company of a big crowd of characters - but overall the results are mostly locked at 30fps. We also tested the PS3 version running at 1080p and noted no difference in performance.