2 Since August 2016 at the latest, partisan FBI and DOJ leaders conspired to destroy Mr. Flynn. These documents show in their own handwriting and emails that they intended either to create an offense they could prosecute or at least get him fired. Then came the incredible malfeasance of Mr. Van Grack’s and the S CO’s prosecution despite their knowledge there was no crime by Mr. Flynn. All this new evidence, and the government has advised t here is more to come, proves that the crimes were committed by the FBI officials and then the prosecutors. The government’s mis conduct in this case is beyond shocking and reprehensible. It mandates dismissal. Furthermore, this Court should order the government immediately to provide the defense with unredacted copies of the documents in Exhibit 3, filed under seal. Those documents were filed under seal solely in an abundance of caution because the government produced them under the protective order, and we request that they be unsealed. Consequently, Mr. Flynn is filing Exhibit 3 to this Supplement contemporaneously and asks that the Court promptly unseal the document. This case is a shameful blight on the American justice sys tem. “The first duties of the officers of the law are to prevent, not to punish crime. It is not their duty to incite to and create crime for the sole purpose of prosecuting and punishing it. . . [I]t is unconscionable, contrary to public policy, and to the established law of the land to punish a man for the commission of an offense of the like of which he had never been guilty, either in thought or in deed, and evidently never would have been guilty of if the officers of the law had not inspired, incited, persuaded, and lured him to attempt to commit it."

Sorrells v. United States

, 287 U.S. 435, 444-45 (1932) (quoting

Butts v. United States

, 273 F. 35, 38 (8th Cir. 1921)).