The only punch Carter landed was a body shot so the win has to go to Winchester. The rules state that a player cannot leave his feet to make a hit. Giroux's hit was illegal because he very clearly left his feet. He was 6" off the ice and his shoulder was well above Winchester's head when he made contact. That fact can't be disputed, and that does make it a dirty hit. Then to top it off he turtles on the ground with his hands in front of his face like a little girl (which seemed to be a recurring theme on the night for the Flyers). Broad Street Bullies? More like Broad Street Sallies. Some people seem to have the same problem understanding or respecting the rules of the game as Giroux, which is basically what the commentators were saying when they said the hit was a cheapshot, which it was. Leaving your feet to make the hit is bad enough, doing it when the guy doesn't see it coming when you're way ahead at the end of the game is worse. If he hadn't left his feet the hit would have been clean and the play probably would have just continued. Some people also have a problem with Winchester's linemates sticking up for him after the hit. So I guess it's fine for Giroux to make the cheap hit, but not ok for the other team to retaliate. No double standard there. Also, if you're Giroux and you've just made what you know is an illegal hit, you should really have your head up expecting a facewash at the very least. One good turn deserves another, and what Neil gave him was exactly what he had coming. Suck it up ladies. The last thing people have a problem with is Winchester fighting with Giroux, because Giroux is a frail all-star and Winchester currently holds the league heavyweight title with Boogard being a close second. News flash: Winchester hardly ever fights and he's not a good fighter anyway. So once again we have the double standard where it's ok for him to take the cheap shot, but not ok to retaliate.