Mycorrhizas

The word mycorrhiza is derived from the Classical Greek words for 'mushroom' and 'root'. In a mycorrhizal association the fungal hyphae of an underground mycelium are in contact with plant roots, but without the fungus parasitizing the plant. In fact the association is commonly (but by no means always) mutually beneficial. Through photosynthesis a chlorophyll-containing plant makes simple carbohydrates (using carbon dioxide, water and sunlight). While it is clear that the majority of plants form mycorrhizas, the exact percentage is uncertain, but it is likely to lie somewhere between 80% and 90%. In many of these associations between 10% and 30% of the food produced by the plant moves through to the fungi.

A point about spelling - youll often see mycorrhizae as another older spelling of the plural of mycorrhiza.

While the classical Greek word for mushroom is part of the word mycorrhiza, there are many mycorrhizal fungi which have fruiting bodies other than mushrooms. An example is Hydnum repandum . Its superficially mushroom-like (stem and cap), but below the cap there are spines rather than gills. Theres more about the fruiting bodies of mycorrhizal fungi later on.

This section gives some basic facts about mycorrhizas. As these associations are important for plant health, they have been extensively researched, both in Australia and overseas. Hence, there is a lot of information available, both on the internet and in printed form. An excellent mycorrhizal website, especially from an Australian perspective, has been created by Mark Brundrett of the University of Western Australia [http://mycorrhizas.info/].It deals mainly with ectomycorrhizas and VA mycorrhizas (both of which will be explained shortly) and gives much detailed information, numerous illustrations, many references and links to numerous other mycorrhizal sites. Further in this section there will be links to specific areas within that site.

Another very useful website, with links to numerous other sites and bibliographies of printed information, is the Mycorrhiza Literature Exchange. [http://mycorrhiza.ag.utk.edu/] The webpage of the new International Mycorrhizal Society (formed in 2002) [http://www.mycorrhizas.org/] may eventually replace the Mycorrhiza Information Exchange.

The printed references given in the button give useful overviews and are the source of much of the information presented here. Ill make special mention of the first of these because it is very recent and with copious references. It also has further information on all the topics discussed below and contains some interesting hypotheses about the evolution of mycorrhizas.

Different types of mycorrhizas

Physically, there are several forms of mycorrhizas, with different forms of hyphal arrangement or associated microscopic structures. Youll find micro-photographs of some of these structures in the introductory section of the this site. [http://mycorrhizas.info/#intro]

In vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas (or VA mycorrhizas) the fungal hyphae penetrate root cells and form intricately branched, shrub-like arbuscles within the cells and, at times, bladder-like vesicles as well. These associations are often called just arbuscular mycorrhizas, since not all the fungi that are involved form vesicles. There will not be much here about the fungi involved in VA mycorrhizas, not because they are unimportant, but because the fungi that are involved are outside the scope of this website. The VA mycorrhizas certainly are very important and are well-covered here [http://mycorrhizas.info/vam.html]. They are the most abundant type of mycorrhiza and the most ancient. It is likely that these fungi originated between 350 and 450 million years ago and probably played an essential role in the colonization of land by the plants.

The hyphae of ectomycorrhizal fungi form a mantle around the root and also grow into the spaces between root cells - but do not penetrate the root cells. The hyphae form a net-like covering, called a Hartig net, around the cells. You’ll find out a lot more about ectomycorrhizas (and see some very nice photographs of Hartig nets) here [http://mycorrhizas.info/ecm.html]. While the VA mycorrhizas are the most abundant, no more than a few hundred species of fungi are involved, whereas over 6,000 species of fungi are involved in ectomycorrhizas. Many of the worlds dominant forest trees form ectomycorrhizas and the ectomycorrhizal fungi produce many of the commonly seen fungal fruiting bodies in Australian forests or gardens. To give just two examples, there are numerous species of Amanita and Cortinarius in Australia and these two fungal genera form ectomycorrhizal associations with various native tree species in a wide variety of habitats. Therell be more about ectomycorrhizal fungi a little later.

In ericoid and orchid mycorrhizas [http://www.anos.org.au/groups/newzealand/biology/fungi.htm] the hyphae penetrate the root cells but neither arbuscles nor vesicles are formed.



Woollsia pungens

Plants in the order Ericales are the dominant species in many arctic or sub-arctic areas of the northern hemisphere and many of the Ericales are more commonly collectively known as "heaths". The bulk of these plants form ericoid mycorrhizas. Examples of Australian heath plants are the genera Epacris, Leucopogon and Woollsia. These and similar plants are often collectively called the epacrids and ericoid mycorrhizas have been found on many of the Australian epacrid plants.

The reference given in the button contains much up-to-date information about mycorrhizas on epacrids and is the source of the various facts about Australian ericoid mycorrhizas given further on.





Thelymitra ixioides

a terrestrial orchid

The terrestrial orchids (of which Australia has many species) form mycorrhizas and need fungal partners in order for seedlings to survive beyond the germination stage. In at least some species the orchid needs the fungus throughout the orchids life. In these associations the orchid gets the better deal and in effect harvests the fungus.

Other types of mycorrhizas, not yet found in Australia are arbutoid mycorrhizas, ectendomycorrhizas and monotropoid mycorrhizas. In effect, these are variants of ectomycorrhizas.

The ecology and roles of mycorrhizas

In many cases there is an exchange of nutrients between the two organisms, but in some mycorrhizal associations the benefits flow one way rather than both ways, as in the orchid example noted above. Where there is an exchange, the fungus receives some of the carbohydrates photosynthesized by the plant and the plant obtains various inorganic nutrients and trace elements which the mycelium has extracted from the soil.

Photosynthesis provides a chlorophyll-containing plant its source of carbon. Other important nutrients, such as nitrogen, potassium and phosphorus (as well as various trace elements) come from the soil. Usually those other nutrients will be dispersed in the soil, so necessitating the exploration of a large volume of soil if the plant is to get the required amounts of those nutrients. In addition, the non-carbon elements will be present in the soil in various chemical compounds - some of which are readily soluble and easily absorbed by roots whereas others are insoluble (and therefore inaccessible to plant roots). If a plant were to use roots to explore a large volume of soil, it would require a considerable expenditure of energy by the plant. Making use of fungal hyphae saves this expenditure. Moreover, the very fine fungal hyphae can explore much finer cavities than roots and are also capable of exploiting compounds that are inaccessible to roots.

Various mycorrhizal fungi also help protect the associated plants against pathogenic fungi, a number of soil microbes, heavy metals and toxic compounds. Experimental studies have shown that many photosynthesizing plants fail to develop into strong individuals, if deprived of their mycorrhizal partners. All in all, the plants get a fair return on the 10-30% of photosynthesized carbohydrates that pass through to the attached mycelia.

Mycorrhizal associations can be fairly complex, with numerous mycelia (from more than one fungal species and of more than one type of mycorrhiza) simultaneously latching onto the roots of one plant. Conversely, a given mycelium may be attached to more than one plant, perhaps even to plants of different species. This latter plant-mycelium-plant connection allows the carbon produced by one plant to move through the attached mycelium to another plant. In this way, a seedling growing in heavy shade (and therefore unable to make much use of the sunlight) can benefit from the photosynthesizing activities of some other, better-placed plant. These intricate, multiway connections have led some people to refer to the underground roots-and-mycelia network as the "wood wide web"!

In the world there are over 400 species of plants which lack chlorophyll. These achlorophyllous plants are found in many families and the majority rely on fungal associates for the carbohydrates which chlorophyllous plants would produce via photosynthesis. In some cases an entire plant family is achlorophyllous (such as the Monotropaceae in the northern hemisphere) while in others (such as the Orchidaceae) only certain genera lack chlorophyll. You can find photos and information about achlorophyllous plants here http://staff-www.uni-marburg.de/~b_morpho/imhtopic.html

In Australia the orchids Gastrodia sesamoides (the Potato Orchid), Dipodium punctatum (the Spotted Hyacinth Orchid) and the two species of the genus Rhizanthella (Rhizanthella gardneri and Rhizanthella slateri) lack chlorophyll. The Rhizanthella species are unusual because they are underground orchids, whereas both Gastrodia and Dipodium produce above-ground flower spikes. The fungi involved in these associations are quite varied, both in terms of species and lifestyles. For example the species of Gastrodia (both in Australia and overseas) are associated with species of Armillaria (a genus of virulently parasitic fungi, which the orchids manage to keep under control). The Western Australian underground orchid Rhizanthella gardneri forms an orchid mycorrhiza with a fungus that also forms ectomycorrhizas with Melaleuca (one of the Australian native Tea Trees). Incidentally, this also shows that some fungi can form more than one type of mycorrhiza. The eastern Australian species, Rhizanthella slateri, pictured here, has been rarely seen. It was discovered in 1931 on Alum Mountain, in Bulahdelah on the New South Wales north coast, and these photos (taken in 2002) are also of specimens growing on Alum Mountain. The fungal associate of this species is unknown.



Rhizanthella slateri

Rhizanthella slateri



All such orchids are directly parasitic on the associated fungi. The carbohydrates that end up in Gastrodia and at least the Western Australian Rhizanthella originated in other living plants, so you could also look at these orchids as being indirectly parasitic on other plants.



Orobanche australiana

Not all the achlorophyllous plants have fungal associates. Some attach directly to the roots of host plants and the best known are probably the Broomrapes, which constitute the genus Orobanche. Here is an Australian example, Orobanche australiana, and this link http://www.parasiticplants.siu.edu/Scrophulariaceae/Orobanche.Gallery.html leads to a photo gallery of Orobanche species from around the world. Another example is the genus Balanophora . Both Balanophora and Orobanche are flowering plants, but are often mistaken for a fungi.

The mycorrhizal associations formed by a particular plant need not be static. Over time, the fungi that are involved can change. Some may associate only with young plants, others come into the picture only when the plant is a few years old - while some may stick around and it is possible that, depending on conditions, there are some which come and go. A study of the ericoid mycorrhizas on several epacrid species in the south-west of Western Australia showed that the mycorrhizas were seasonal. The area has a Mediterranean climate with cool, wet winters but hot, dry summers. The mycorrhizas are formed on the very fine hair roots that grow out from the main roots. In summer many of the hair roots die but regrow, and become mycorrhizal, in the wet winter months. Similar studies around Sydney, not subject to a Mediterranean climate, didnt show this die-regrow pattern and studies in the northern hemisphere also show year-round persistence of mycorrhizal roots in most species. In summary it seems that, except in very dry conditions, ericoid mycorrhizas are present and functioning all year round.

Finally, the formation of the mycelium-root connection is not just a simple matter of fungus-meets-plant, fungus-hooks-onto-plant. There are soil bacteria, known as mycorrhizal helper bacteria, which promote the formation of mycorrhizas.

You’ll find out much more about the roles of mycorrhizas here [http://mycorrhizas.info/roles.html].

Which plants form mycorrhizas?

It has been estimated that at least 80% and perhaps up to 90% of the world's plants form mycorrhizas of one form or another and you will find mycorrhizal associations from well-watered forests to the arid areas.

The table on this page [http://mycorrhizas.info/ozplants.html] gives the mycorrhizal status of numerous genera of Australian plants. Many of the imported garden trees in Australia are also mycorrhizal, for example beeches, oaks, firs and pines.



Banksia praemorsa

Though a great many Australian plants form mycorrhizas, especially VA mycorrhizas, there are some noteworthy exceptions. For example, many genera in the Proteaceae (which includes the widespread genera Banksia, Grevillea and Hakea) do not form mycorrhizas. Even in artificial conditions, when attempts are made to force mycorrhizas these genera seem to actively resist mycorrhizal formation.

While 80-90% of plants form mycorrhizas, the proportion of mycorrhizal plants in a particular habitat may be markedly different from the percentage range just given. Depending on the plant composition of an area the proportion of mycorrhizal plants may be virtually 100% or less than 50%. Given what was just said about the Proteaceae, just think of an area of Australian bushland dominated by Grevillea and Hakea with just a few eucalypts and a scattering of other plants.

Liverworts are another group of plants with fungal associates. Though liverworts are plants they lack both roots and the internal nutrient conducting systems found in the ferns and flowering plants. Liverworts have anchoring filaments, called rhizoids, which are superficially root-like in appearance but, unlike roots, do not draw water or minerals from the soil. Instead, water and minerals are absorbed through the liverwort surfaces. So, strictly speaking, liverworts cannot form mycorrhizas, since these have been defined as requiring roots. However, a number of liverworts form fungal associations that physically resemble mycorrhizas, with fungal hyphae found in the liverwort rhizoids. The functions of some of these liverwort-fungus associations still need to be determined.

In the northern hemisphere heath plants (in the family Ericaceae) and some groups of liverworts can form associations with the same group of fungi. Fungi that are either the same as (or very similar to) the northern hemisphere ones have also been observed in ericoid mycorrhizas with Australian epacrids as well as in mycorrhiza-like associations with some Australian liverworts. One suggestion is that the liverwort rhizoids serve as a source from which the fungi can colonize plant roots. However, the nature of the association (if any) between liverworts, fungi and northern hemisphere heaths (or Australian epacrids) is unknown but is being investigated.

Almost all liverworts contain chlorophyll and so produce simple sugars through photosynthesis, just as the majority of other plants do. The genus Cryptothallus, found in the northern hemisphere, is an exception and lacks chlorophyll. As in the case of the achlorophyllous orchids mentioned above, Cryptothallus relies on its fungal partner for nutrients.

Which fungi form mycorrhizas?

The fungi that form mycorrhizas are quite varied. Ectomycorrhizal fungi produce many of the easily seen fruiting bodies that you commonly come across. There are many mushroom-producing ectomycorrhizal fungi and examples of Amanita and Cortinarius were given earlier. These are large mycorrhizal genera, with many species worldwide. While there are many native Amanita species in Australia, there are also some introduced species. For example, Amanita muscaria (commonly called the Fly Agaric) and Amanita phalloides (known as the Deathcap [see DEATHCAP SECTION]) have been introduced unintentionally. Youll commonly see the first of these near pine or birch trees and the latter near oak trees. However, in Tasmania Amanita muscaria has been found growing in native Nothofagus forests - with not a pine or birch tree anywhere to be seen. Amanita muscaria has also been introduced to New Zealand, where it has been found in native forests with Kunzea and Leptospermum. While some fungi may have preferences for particular plants, the Tasmanian and New Zealand reports show that at least some mycorrhizal fungi can take up new partners. There has also been a report of Amanita phalloides associating with eucalypts in Canberra (but this requires more investigation) and there are records of that species in a eucalypt plantation in Tanzania and near eucalypts in Algeria.

Apart from Amanita and Cortinarius there are many more species of mushroom-producing ectomycorrhizal fungi in various genera - Hebeloma , Inocybe, Lactarius , Paxillus, and Russula to give a few examples of commonly seen genera.

As noted at the beginning of this mycorrhizal section, there are numerous non-mushroom, ectomycorrhizal fungi and youve already seen the example of Hydnum repandum, which was pictured right at the start. The majority of truffle-like fungi are mycorrhizal and examples of these are the introduced species Melanogaster ambiguus (which is found growing near introduced oak trees), this native species of Setchelliogaster and Peziza whitei , another endemic Australian species. Some of the coral fungi, many boletes, such as the native Phlebopus marginatus and the introduced Suillus luteus (which is found under non-native pine trees) and a few powdery, superficially puffball-like fungi (such as Pisolithus and Scleroderma ) are mycorrhizal.

The earthstar-like Astraeus hygrometricum (introduced to Australia) is known to be ectomycorrhizal with various northern hemisphere tree species.

Species of Morchella can grow quite well as saprotrophs, but some overseas studies suggest that the species of Morchella may sometimes form ectomycorrhizas.

The corticioid fungi commonly produce their flat, sheet-like fruiting bodies on the underside of dead wood, twigs and similar plant litter on the forest floor. It would be excusable to suppose that these are all saprotrophic fungi, feeding on the dead plant matter on which the fruiting bodies are formed. That is often the case but in the northern hemisphere there are about a hundred species of corticioid fungi that are mycorrhizal, many of them in the genus Tomentella. A probable mycorrhizal Tomentella has been found in Australia recently, but the majority of Australian corticioid fungi are poorly studied.

The mycorrhizal nature of a few of those hundred corticioid species in the northern hemisphere has been known for a long time, but in most cases the mycorrhizal evidence was discovered in the late 1900s. These corticioid genera contain confirmed ectomycorrhizal species: Amphinema, Byssocorticium, Byssoporia, Piloderma, Pseudotomentella, Tomentella, Tylospora. Tylopsora fibrillosa is not known from Australia and the photo was taken in a Sphagnum bog in Estonia. The whitish bloom growing over the Sphagnum plants is the Tylospora fruiting body and is lined with the spore-producing basidia. These corticioid genera are suspected to contain ectomycorrhizal species: Athelia, Lindtneria, Tomentellopsis, Trechispora.

There are more photographs of fruiting bodies of ectomycorrhizal fungi here [http://mycorrhizas.info/ecmf.html].

Many of the VA mycorrhizal fungi do not produce fruiting bodies, the spores often being produced on hyphae in the soil near plant roots. Where fruiting bodies are formed they are usually more-or-less spherical in shape and truffle-like, in that they are hidden in the soil or leaf litter. Many fruiting bodies are small, only a millimetre or so in diameter, though some can get to a couple of centimetres or more in diameter. The fungi are neither ascomycetes nor basidiomycetes and are outside the scope of this website.

Identification of the fungi present in ericoid mycorrhizas is mostly based on the physical, chemical or DNA analyses of the hyphae found in roots, since fruiting bodies are rarely found. Understandably, there is still very much to be learnt about the fungi involved. The best known ericoid mycorrhizal fungus, Hymenoscyphus ericae, is an ascomycete that produces small disc-like fruiting bodies up to 1mm in diameter. However, it appears the fruiting bodies have never been seen in the wild and have been produced in laboratory experiments, only with considerable difficulty. While there is still much ignorance about the species of fungi involved, the various chemical, physical and DNA studies indicate that there is considerable similarity between the northern and southern hemisphere fungi that form ericoid mycorrhizas.

Orchids form mycorrhizas with various macro and micro fungi. The association with the mushroom genus Armillaria was mentioned above, but a number of orchids are known to form associations with macrofungi in the genera Ceratobasidium, Sebacina, Thanatephorus, Thelephora, Tomentella and Tulasnella. Many of these form inconspicuous fruiting bodies, sometimes being no more than powdery or cobwebby coatings on forest litter.

A thousand words

Since a picture is worth a thousand words, heres a simple diagram (plus a few words) which portrays some of the complexities described earlier.

So, whats going on....