Two US congressmen introduced bipartisan legislation designed to prevent bitcoin price manipulation and position the United States as a leader in the crypto industry.

Democrat Rep. Darren Soto of Florida and Republican Rep. Ted Budd of North Carolina unveiled the following bills:

Virtual Currency Consumer Protection Act . This bill directs the CFTC to explain how price manipulation occurs and to recommend regulatory changes to prevent it.

. This bill directs the CFTC to explain how price manipulation occurs and to recommend regulatory changes to prevent it. Virtual Currency Market and Regulatory Competitiveness Act. This law directs the CFTC to conduct a comparative study of crypto regulations in other countries and to recommend ways to make the United States more competitive by providing regulatory clarity and finding alternatives to burdensome laws that impede innovation.

Lawmakers: Crypto Can Drive Economic Growth

In a joint statement released December 6, Rep. Darren Soto and Rep. Ted Budd underscored the “profound potential” of cryptocurrencies and blockchain, the technology underpinning bitcoin.

“Virtual currencies and the underlying blockchain technology has a profound potential to be a driver of economic growth,” the congressmen said. “That’s why we must ensure that the United States is at the forefront.”

Soto and Budd said the laws they proposed would protect consumers and investors without dampening the “environment of innovation” that would maximize the potential of these groundbreaking technologies.

DOJ Probes Bitcoin Price Manipulation

In September 2018, the New York Attorney General’s Office released a report concluding that some cryptocurrency exchanges can easily be manipulated because they lack sufficient consumer protections, are riddled with conflicts of interest, and don’t have safeguards to prevent abusive trading.

“Platforms lack robust real-time and historical market surveillance capabilities — like those found in traditional trading venues — to identify and stop suspicious trading patterns,” the report said.

In November 2018, the US Department of Justice launched a criminal investigation into whether the cryptocurrency market’s spectacular price spike in 2017 was manipulated using tether (USDT).

The DOJ probe came five months after a University of Texas finance professor published a report claiming that at least 50 percent of the increase in bitcoin’s price in 2017 was artificially manipulated using tether.

Report: Bitcoin Price Was Artificially Inflated

In his damning 66-page research paper entitled “Is Bitcoin Really Un-Tethered?“, Professor John M. Griffin said trading patterns suggest there was coordinated manipulation designed to keep bitcoin prices artificially high.

Griffin — who specializes in spotting financial fraud — claimed tether was used numerous times to buy bitcoin on Bitfinex after its price slipped.

“It was creating price support for bitcoin, and over the period that we examined, had huge price effects,” Professor Griffin said. “Our research would indicate that there are sophisticated people harnessing investor interest for their benefit.”

Tom Lee: Keep Calm and Hodl On

While skeptics point to regulatory crackdowns to discredit the industry, bitcoin bulls like the Winklevoss twins and Fundstrat’s Tom Lee welcome regulatory scrutiny, saying it will help — not hurt — the industry by ridding it of scam artists. This, in turn, will legitimize the market, they argue.

“Do I think bitcoin as a long-term fundamental story is broken? I don’t think so,” Lee said. “Price at the moment isn’t confirming fundamentals.”

Bitcoin plunged 16% Tuesday and fell as low as $4,200.22. Crypto evangelist Tom Lee joined us to discuss why he is lowering his bitcoin price target to $15,000 from $25,000. https://t.co/H04pEqEm7v pic.twitter.com/AZ2zQZWcea — CNBC (@CNBC) November 20, 2018

Lee also pointed out that bitcoin’s market penetration is gradually increasing, despite recent setbacks. “The next wave of adoption is institutional,” he said. “There is a crossover happening. This is just an awkward transition.”