Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>

On 25/02/2015 14:27, Alexey Melnikov wrote: > CFRG chairs are starting another poll: > > Q3: This is a Quaker poll (please answer one of "preferred", > "acceptable" or "no") for each curve specified below: > > 1) 448 (Goldilocks) > 2) 480 > 3) 521 > 4) other curve (please name another curve that you "prefer" or > "accept", or state "no") Thank you for all responses. 521 - 6 preferred, 14 - acceptable 448 - 16 preferred, 4 - acceptable Very few prefer others (512 NUMS, 480). So CFRG prefers curve 448. > > If you stated your curve preferences in the poll that ended on > February 23rd (see the attachment), you don't need to reply to this > poll, your opinion is already recorded. But please double check what > chairs recorded (see the attachment). > > If you changed your mind or only answered the question about > performance versa memory usage for curves 512 and 521, feel free to > reply. > > Once this issues is settled, we will be discussing (in no particular > order. Chairs reserve the right to add additional questions) > implementation specifics and coordinate systems for Diffie-Hellman. We > will then make decisions on signature schemes. Please don't discuss > any of these future topics at this time.