In an attempt to downplay Bill Clinton’s deep ties with convicted child molester – and Clinton Foundation co-founder – Jeffrey Epstein, Hillary Clinton will push a questionable lawsuit alleging that Trump kept “sex slaves” with Epstein’s help.

The Clintons’ achilles heel is Bill’s sexual abuse and his alleged pedophilia linked to Epstein, and to curtail this weakness they are trying to pin Bill’s reported crimes on Trump, according to insiders.

This is ironic – and desperate – given that Bill flew at least 16 times on Epstein’s private 747 known as the “Lolita Express.”

“Epstein is a registered sex offender who would regularly host Clinton and many others at his private Caribbean island before being put in prison for sexually abusing underage girls around the globe,” according to the Washington Free Beacon. “He spent just 13 months in jail for the charges, though evidence is reported to have existed that could have led to more serious federal charges such as using his private jet for sex trafficking.”

On one trip, Clinton and Epstein visited the Sultan of Brunei and his brother, the Prince, who are “infamous for their sex parties and their harems composed mainly of underage girls,” the New York Post reported.

All of this, of course, poses a problem for the Clintons. How do they deflect?

By claiming that Trump is the sex offender and not Bill, despite all the evidence to the contrary, including the numerous sex cases Bill has previously settled.

The Clintons in particular will use a recently refiled lawsuit claiming that Trump, with Epstein’s help, raped a 13-year-old in 1994.

Interestingly, an Obama-appointed federal judge, Ronnie Abrams, was assigned to preside over the case and ordered a December hearing – after the election.

However, when the lawsuit was initially filed in April, questions were raised about its validity by the media.

For one thing, the lawsuit, which was anonymously filed, seems light on details of the alleged crimes and the specific circumstances.

Mainstream reporters also discovered that the plaintiff’s address listed in the court documents is a foreclosed home in Twentynine Palms, Calif., and that no one had lived there since its owner died in Oct. 2015.

There’s no known connection between the deceased owner and the plaintiff.

In fact, days before the plaintiff filed the lawsuit, the property was officially taken over by a mortgage lender after it went into default.

“A neighbor… told Radar that no one has lived at the home since its owner died,” Radar Online reported. “He said he and other neighbors have kept a close watch on the home because it was overrun by drug addicts who squatted there while [the owner] was hospitalized in the final days of his life.”

“The neighbors, with the help of police, managed to clean up the home several months before his death, Radar has learned.”

Additionally, the plaintiff apparently filed the lawsuit without legal representation and did not refile the case until nearly a month before the election – meaning that it won’t even go to trial until well after election day, if it’s not eventually thrown out.

There won’t even be an initial hearing until December, as previously mentioned.

“What’s more, the phone number the woman listed on the court documents is not connected, and she also told the court she had less than $300 to her name in savings,” Radar also reported.

The mainstream media may also attack Trump by using a 2002 New York magazine interview in which he praised Epstein, but the interview was several years before Epstein was first accused of sexually abusing underage girls.

The Emergency Election Sale is now live! Get 30% to 60% off our most popular products today!