From RationalWiki

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons is a small group of physicians who, under a false authoritative name, advocate for far-right conservative values in the practice of medicine. While purporting to have high regard for the Hippocratic Oath, "the sanctity of the patient-physician relationship, and the "practice of private medicine",[1] it appears to treat these concepts as terms of art. Despite also calling itself "non-partisan", its main focus appears to be opposing abortion, vaccination, universal health care coverage and Obamacare in particular, and birth control.

These concerns evidence a particular contempt for women's health and wellness. The AAPS specifically opposes vaccination for HPV,[2] a known cancer-causing virus for which a vaccine administered to young women is extremely effective. The group also makes the objectively false claim that there is a meaningful correlation between abortion and breast cancer.[3]

Its website offers this ridiculous claim:

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) is a non-partisan professional association of physicians in all types of practices and specialties across the country. Since 1943, AAPS has been dedicated to the highest ethical standards of the Oath of Hippocrates and to preserving the sanctity of the patient-physician relationship and the practice of private medicine. Our motto, "omnia pro aegroto" means "all for the patient."[4]

The AAPS is listed as a quack organization by Quackwatch[5]. The organization has made the questionable decision of engaging homeschool instructor and Conservapedia founder Andrew Schlafly as its general counsel to represent its interests in a variety of matters, including filing amici briefs in appellate litigation and even representing member physicians in disciplinary proceedings.

We have witnessed an accelerated transformation of our profession away from individualized patient care toward politicized and collectivized “evidence-based medicine.” Without a doubt, this one-size-fits-all approach does not work and never can.[6]

Crowded office [ edit ]

As of 2016, their president, Melinda Woofter, has stated:So, there you have it. Bring in the leeches and bloodletters, I guess.

Its physical address, 1601 N Tucson Blvd #9, Tucson AZ 85716, a suite in a medical center, is shared with a lot of other equally weird organizations including Doctors for Disaster Preparedness, the American Health Legal Foundation,[7] the AAPS Educational Foundation (contact: Dr Jane Orient), Physicians for Civil Defense (contact: Dr Jane Orient),[8] the Southwestern Institute of Science (contact: Dr Jane Orient),[9] and the Southern Arizona Association for Play Therapy.[10]

Activities [ edit ]

Many of these activities appear to violate their "Patient's Bill of Rights", which, among other things, states:

(the right) to refuse third-party interference in their medical care, and to be confident that their actions in seeking or declining medical care will not result in third-party-imposed penalties for patients or physicians

AAPS files lawsuit against FDA to overturn approval of "Plan B" morning after pill for over the counter use by women over 18. [11]

Fight against "Sham Peer Review": The AAPS recognizes "sham peer review" as an abusive use of such entities as hospital by-laws and disciplinary committees to exclude physicians for other-than legitimate or the explicitly-stated reasons. [12]

Defense of a physician convicted of improper narcotic prescribing while operating a clinic to treat patients with chronic pain. [13]

Fighting mandatory vaccination. [14]

Fighting against mandated mental health parity, [15] which is advocated by the National Alliance on Mental Illness, American Medical Association, [16] the American Psychiatric Association, and the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. [17]

which is advocated by the National Alliance on Mental Illness, American Medical Association, the American Psychiatric Association, and the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Promoting contracting between physicians and patients without government or insurance company involvement.

Fighting socialized and single-payer healthcare. [18]

Fighting to "debunk" Shaken baby syndrome, and to link it to vaccines rather than abuse. [19]

Advocating for so-called "freedom of conscience" to allow pharmacists to refuse to fill lawful prescriptions. [20] This would appear to interfere with a patient's right "to refuse third party interference in their health care".

This would appear to interfere with a patient's right "to refuse third party interference in their health care". Fighting abortion, not simply through moral objection, but also by attempting to link abortion to unrelated health problems, [21] including breast cancer. [22]

including breast cancer. Advocating against the sale of organs for transplant. [23]

Advocating against organ donation in cases where brain death is unclear. [24]

Advocating against withdrawal of care, as in the Terri Schiavo case,[25] including misrepresenting the results of autopsy in the case.[26]

Publications [ edit ]

The AAPS publishes the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons (JPANDS), until 2003 called the Medical Sentinel. The journal is not considered a valid, peer-reviewed journal for inclusion in major scientific databases, and has been listed by Quackwatch as "Fundamentally Flawed"[27]. An article in the "journal"[28] was used in 2008 to justify a petition against proposed solutions to the problem of global warming.[29]

Members [ edit ]

Conflicts [ edit ]

According to their literature:

AAPS members believe this patient-physician relationship must be protected from all forms of third-party intervention.

The organization, a third party to the Schiavo case, interfered in the relationship between the patient's advocate and physicians, even helping to bring the power of the federal government to bear on a single medical case.

AAPS advocates for so-called "freedom of conscience" where patients are denied legal drugs, treatments, and information based on the morals of the provider rather than the patient.

AAPS views patient advance directives designed for dignity at the end-of-life as a financial plot to kill patients in order to save money.[43]

Quackery [ edit ]

The society's "journal" JPANDS has published an article on the supposed link between breast cancer and abortion.[44] It has been roundly debunked.[45][46][47] Near the end of the 2008 Presidential Election the "journal" published a claim that Barack Obama uses neuro-linguistic programming to exercise mind control over people at his rallies.[48]

On their website, former AAPS president Dr. Lawrence Huntoon describes peer review boards which review complaints against doctors as "an insidious and spreading evil which threatens to destroy not only the integrity of the medical profession but quality care for all patients."[49]

Stepping into the fray [ edit ]

In the midst of the 2016 U.S. presidential election, they released a survey purporting to show that a large number of medical professionals harbor grave concerns about Hillary Clinton's health; specifically, that her health is in such a poor state that it "could be disqualifying for the position of President of the U.S."[50] Of course, who these medical professionals are is nowhere to be found.

What's that? Did I hear you say they could be the doctors in the AAPS?!1?!?!11!?! That's patently absurd. Don't be ridiculous. Are you high?