So what was wrong in 2019 is now both wrong and ridiculous.

At that time, Evers hadn’t proposed any such thing, and the article only details a call for red flag laws from the attorney general.

A Facebook post finding new life amid the coronavirus outbreak says Evers is pushing gun confiscation, but the linked article is from April 2019.

A year-old claim about Gov. Tony Evers and firearm confiscation is getting new life online amid the coronavirus pandemic.

Many on Facebook have recently picked up a story from April 2019 headlined "Wisconsin gov. pushing firearm confiscation orders."

When shared, no date for the story is visible on Facebook.

The post was flagged as part of Facebook’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Facebook.)

The new life and lack of date gives this claim a very different ring amid the flurry of executive orders by Evers.

The first-term Democrat has taken a series of dramatic steps to limit activity in Wisconsin as he and officials across the country take steps to contain the spread of coronavirus. His latest "Safe at Home" order, issued Tuesday, March 24, 2020, closed non-essential businesses and gathering places until April 24.

But none of those orders deals with gun confiscations.

The headline was misleading in 2019.

Surfaced a year later, it’s downright ridiculous.

Missing proof

The article, from a website called Steadfast and Loyal, describes Evers as "attacking the Second Amendment." But it offers zero proof for that claim or the headline reference to the governor "pushing firearm confiscation orders."

Instead it pastes in a series of paragraphs from a similarly headlined story from far-right Breitbart news, published back in January 2019.

But neither story actually details Evers proposing any such thing. The Breitbart story — as quoted by Steadfast and Loyal — refers to a WISN-TV story about Attorney General Josh Kaul, a Democrat, calling for red flag laws during his inaugural address.

We will note, though the stories didn’t, that Evers had generally voiced support for Kaul’s plan in January 2019.

Defining red flag laws

But there’s a huge difference between red flag laws and the widespread gun seizures implied by this headline.

Red flag laws provide a mechanism — with a judge’s approval — to take guns from people exhibiting dangerous behavior before they harm themselves or others.

RELATED: Do red flag laws allow gun seizure without a judge’s OK?

RELATED: Wisconsin Assembly Speaker's new take on red-flag gun laws still misses target

At the time the Steadfast and Loyal article was written, Evers hadn’t proposed anything in this vein, but he later did, in November 2019. He called a special session of the Legislature to consider proposals for a red flag law and universal background checks, but Republicans who control the Assembly and Senate immediately closed the session without action.

Under Evers’ proposal, a law enforcement officer, family member or household member could petition a judge to intervene if they believe an individual is a danger to self or others. The judge then could issue a preliminary order good for up to 14 days, during which the guns could be taken away. A judge would then schedule a full hearing, where the gun owner could present his or her case and the judge could issue a final order valid for up to one year.

Our rating

A year-old story now circulating again on Facebook says Evers is "pushing firearm confiscation orders."

That was an overreach in 2019, and it’s even more absurd now.

The article was referring to red flag laws, but at the time of this post Evers hadn’t proposed one yet. And more importantly, red flag laws are a far cry from the implication this headline gives of some form of widespread gun confiscation.

We rate this claim Pants on Fire.