What happens when we give quarterbacks two more points for each touchdown pass?

Like snowflakes, no two fantasy leagues are alike. (Man, that was lame.)

Are you getting points for a reception? How deep is the bench? Can you start a tight end in the flex spot? Is it a two-quarterback league?

The many variations to league structures lead to even more specific fantasy questions. I canâ€™t even tell you how many times on Twitter Iâ€™ve gotten questions along the lines of, â€œHey, in my .5 PPR, two-quarterback (no flex) with .25 points per completion league, would you take Andre Brown in the eighth round?â€

The problem there is obvious: Typical analysis is done using only a handful of scoring systems. Anytime your league shies away from the traditional ways, analysis becomes a little more obsolete.

Now, you could always use numberFireâ€™s cheat sheet and enter your specific league information. Not only is it extremely helpful for the crazy rules your league institutes, but it can give you a great understanding of how value shifts. Essentially, before you ask any questions, you should always check that out.

Fantasy owners donâ€™t always just want lists though. They want to understand the â€œwhyâ€ aspect of fantasy analysis. Iâ€™m sure Nik, the founder and CEO here at numberFire, is asked on a consistent basis to describe the algorithms used for our projections. Clearly heâ€™s not going to give away how theyâ€™re formulated, especially to someone with the Twitter handle â€œJason4Ever1994â€. But that doesnâ€™t mean people wonâ€™t ask. They want to know why things are the way they are.

The most common non-standard question I receive â€“ whether via email or on Twitter â€“ is, â€œWhat happens to your draft strategy when quarterbacks are rewarded six points per touchdown pass rather than four?â€ I try to answer, but itâ€™s difficult to fit in a legitimate explanation in 140 characters or less. Iâ€™ll point them to our nifty tool, but they often times come back and want further justification.

Hopefully after this analysis, I can just send these inquirers the URL to this article.

The Scoring Impact

To begin, letâ€™s take a look at our top-12 quarterback projections in standard, 4-points per touchdown pass leagues.

Quarterback Projected Fantasy Points Aaron Rodgers 340.94 Drew Brees 334.44 Tom Brady 333.06 Peyton Manning 330.41 Cam Newton 326.44 Matt Ryan 314.40 Colin Kaepernick 302.97 Tony Romo 295.60 Robert Griffin III 291.14 Matthew Stafford 272.56 Russell Wilson 270.35 Andrew Luck 267.72

Why only look at 12 signal-callers? Well, from a high level, this will give us a look at how much of an advantage a team is getting versus any other squad in a 12-team league at the quarterback position. This is not the best way to do value analysis, but itâ€™s a quick and dirty method to explain the difference in point value. Bear with me.

Weâ€™ve got Rodgers for around 341 fantasy points in standard, 4-points per touchdown pass leagues this season. The worst hypothetical starter is Andrew Luck â€“ our 12th-ranked quarterback â€“ who is projected to score about 268 points. The difference between the two is 73.22 points across an entire season.

Letâ€™s now do the same, but adjust things for six points for each touchdown pass:

Quarterback Projected Fantasy Points Aaron Rodgers 411.38 Drew Brees 410.46 Peyton Manning 405.63 Tom Brady 403.34 Matt Ryan 380.86 Cam Newton 368.10 Tony Romo 359.34 Colin Kaepernick 351.35 Robert Griffin III 331.24 Matthew Stafford 325.68 Ben Roethlisberger 325.22 Russell Wilson 315.87

Not only did the top 12 shift, but the difference in point projections increased. Aaron Rodgers owners now have a 95.51-point advantage versus the worst theoretical starter, giving Rodgers owners a larger benefit when compared to standard leagues.

The reason thereâ€™s an increase in quarterback point margin from best to worst starter is because the elite quarterbacks are projected to throw more touchdowns than other passers. Thereâ€™s not a simple shift, as the low-end QB1s arenâ€™t throwing as many touchdown passes.

If you canâ€™t comprehend why the math works this way, think of it from an exaggerated standpoint. If quarterbacks were rewarded 100 points for each touchdown pass, would you value Aaron Rodgers and Drew Brees more than you do in a standard league? Hopefully you answered yes, because both of them are virtual locks to be near the top of the league in passing touchdowns. If they were to throw just three more scores than any other quarterback, youâ€™re gaining a significant edge at the position.

Clearly thatâ€™s not the case, as youâ€™re only gaining an additional two points per scoring throw when compared to the typical league. But keep the bottom line in mind while we move through this analysis: Elite quarterbacks matter more in 6-point passing touchdown leagues.

Should We Devalue Rushing Quarterbacks?

Most astute fantasy owners know that scrambling, athletic quarterbacks have historically not thrown as many touchdown passes as traditional pocket passers have. Cam Newton may be fantasy football gold to some, but letâ€™s be real, folks â€“ the man has averaged 20 touchdown tosses over the first two years of his career. Thatâ€™s worse than Josh Freeman, Ryan Fitzpatrick and Andy Dalton over the same time frame.

Taking a look at the shift in rankings though, thereâ€™s a different story told. Cam Newton, Colin Kaepernick and Russell Wilson only dropped one slot when the scoring was modified, and Robert Griffin III actually stayed put. Hmmâ€¦

Does this mean we shouldnâ€™t devalue rushing quarterbacks? Not exactly. You see, one thing to keep in mind is that they do get worse â€“ in terms of points â€“ compared to the elite passers. Cam Newton, for instance, is no longer part of the elite discussion. The other thing to remember is that the rushing passers may not have as high of a weekly floor. Weâ€™re only looking at year-end results here. Thereâ€™s a possibility â€“ and a good one, too â€“ that Cam Newton secured a significant amount of points in just a handful of games. True pocket passers, on the other hand, will give you more game-to-game consistency.

Replaceability and Fun Times With Economics

The first thing you learned in any economics course was the basic functions of supply and demand. According to The Google, supply and demand is defined as â€œthe amount of a commodity, product, or service available and the desire of buyers for it, considered as factors regulating its price.â€

â€œWhy are we talking about this in a fantasy football article?â€ says Barney.

Because itâ€™s important.

The second half of the definition, â€œthe desire of buyers for itâ€, is the demand aspect of the equation. The desire, in fantasy football, is the need to fulfill a lineup requirement. At quarterback, this lineup requirement is, quite simply, â€œoneâ€.

â€œThe amount of a commodity, product, or service availableâ€¦â€ is the â€œhow many useable quarterbacks are there to fulfill my lineup obligation?â€

Thatâ€™s where things get a little fuzzy.

Everyone â€“ even my dog, Henry â€“ has been saying the quarterback position is deep in 2013. Itâ€™s true. Weâ€™ve talked about it many times here at numberFire. You could, however, based on supply and demand principles, make the argument that the quarterback position is deep every year.

When you only need one in your standard lineup, thereâ€™s an excess of supply. Regardless of your scoring rules, there are 32 starting quarterbacks in the NFL, and only a dozen will be started in your 12-team league. Some may have passers on their bench, but the Brandon Weedens of the league will more than likely be free agents.

And now youâ€™re probably asking, â€œWhy would I want to start Brandon Weeden? So what if heâ€™s a free agent?â€ Well, you donâ€™t want to start Weeden, but consider this: There were 25 different quarterbacks who cracked the positionâ€™s top 12 last season four or more times. Considering you only need one in your lineup, that surplus is much greater than at wide receiver and running back. And itâ€™s only because of lineup limitations, not because of the positionsâ€™ importance on a real football field.

This is all to say that fantasy football is a weekly game. When you draft a quarterback, a wide receiver or a tight end, youâ€™re not locked to starting them each week throughout the season. You make lineup decisions up until Sunday kickoffs. Because thereâ€™s only one lineup slot for your signal-caller, you can realistically build a quarterback Frankenstein while stocking up on your running back and wide receivers throughout the draft.

Replaceability: How easy is it to replace a particular position in fantasy football? Because of supply and demand principles and weekly lineup changes, you can actually devalue the position in single-quarterback leagues, even if youâ€™re getting more points for touchdown passes. There will be weeks where Brandon Weeden outscores Aaron Rodgers, and you can capitalize because itâ€™s one of the more predictable positions in fantasy. Unfortunately, wide receiver and running back production isnâ€™t as foreseeable each week, as usage from waiver wire commodities is always questionable.

How to Approach 6-Point Passing Touchdown Leagues

The idea mentioned above is what fantasy analysts like to call â€œstreamingâ€. You start a different player in a lineup slot each week based on matchup, rather than going with one, plug-and-play option. Because of supply and demand, positions with just one spot in your lineup (QB, TE, D/ST, K) are streamable. Wide receiver and running back slots are not, unless youâ€™re in a four-team league.

Your goal at draft time should never be to stream. However, know that itâ€™s a worst-case scenario situation. And itâ€™s not a bad one.

That, ladies and gentlemen, is why 6-point passing touchdown leagues may not skew quarterback strategy as much as advertised. Itâ€™s not to say elite quarterbacks donâ€™t hold more value, because they do. But reaching for one could be an unnecessary venture in 2013 because of the depth and replaceability at the position. Even in leagues where you get more points for each scoring toss.

You may see it as risky, but to me, the true risk is losing an opportunity in getting a library full of solid running backs and receivers â€“ the scarce resource in fantasy football. That doesnâ€™t change when you receive an additional two points for each throwing touchdown. It only does when the demand of your lineup requirements is altered.

In essence, there will more than likely be an owner who selects a quarterback early in one of these leagues. While he â€“ they â€“ do that, you know what waiting on a quarterback means. Itâ€™s not to say you shouldnâ€™t go for Matt Ryan, Tony Romo or Matthew Stafford. Itâ€™s to say that drafting one in the first couple of rounds may be overrated.