Fletcher Building suffered an annus horribilis in 2017, and 2018 is looking like it will be testing for the company as well.

Mismanagement of Fletcher Building may have destroyed up to $2.7 billion in wealth over the past nine years.



Fletcher Building has extended the halt on trading of its shares here and across the Tasman as it continues to review mounting losses on key construction projects.



Professor Jilnaught Wong, in the department of accounting and finance at the University of Auckland business school, estimated the company had suffered between $1.7 billion and $2.7b in total wealth loss over the past nine years as a result of not earning enough to cover the cost of its capital.

"It's quite horrific – if you think about an organisation that's supposed to be performing."

READ MORE:

* Fletcher Building extends trading halt

* Fletcher Building boss's exit must trigger some soul searching

KIRK HARGREAVES/STUFF Fletcher Building's share price topped more than $12 in 2008, but was $7.77 before the trading halt began.

He said the company seemed to have been trying to work its assets harder to boost productivity, but its profit margins were declining. "It's quite frightening. This is their third go at an assessment of what their losses will be."

Wong said investors who put money into Fletcher Building could end up being burnt.

The share price topped more than $12 in 2008 but was $7.77 before the trading halt began. It had previously dropped below $6.

SUPPLIED Ross Taylor, the new chief executive of Fletcher Building, maybe reassessing the losses to provide a clean slate to start from.

"Their profitability is hurting them," Wong said. "There's no point being really productive if you're not profitable."

Wong said there were questions to ask about the construction sector experience of the Fletcher board, because it was an industry where specialist knowledge was required. "General knowledge is not good enough... The company has been around for so long and construction is not a new industry, there should be people around with experience."

But he said those working in management in the troubled building and interiors (B&I) unit "ought to have known what's going on – why isn't that information filtering through?

JOHN SELKIRK/STUFF Fletcher Building has had a number of chief executives over recent years, including Jonathan Ling, (left) and Mark Adamson.

"You would expect people with expert specialist knowledge to get it right. Will they get it right the third time? I thought they were reasonably confident they got it right the second time.

"It's a great company with lots of legacy, it's a shame the performance hasn't been there and hasn't been there for quite a while. That's come home to roost."

He said Fletcher should look hard at not only its board level but organisational governance to examine the quality control involved in setting its pricing and bidding strategies.

New chief executive Ross Taylor has a background in the construction sector. Wong said it could be that he wanted to reassess the situation to allow himself to start from a clean slate base.

News is expected by Wednesday. Fletcher is believed to be renegotiating its debt covenants and working to avoid needing to raise more money – something that could be difficult given the pressure on its share price.

Sam Trethewey, of Milford Asset Management, said the prospect of a capital raising, offering discounted equity in return for extra cash, was not a good one for shareholders in the current market environment.

He said he expected Fletcher to do what it could to instead negotiate to give its lenders comfort that its issues were one-off. But he said the $2 billion of debt held by Fletcher Building was complex and across a number of different parties.

A Fletcher Building spokeswoman said the company could not comment during a trading halt.