Decision:

1. Set aside Order 4 of the consent orders made on 16 February 2017 (but noting that any use by the defendants of the documents falling within the scope of Order 4 that would otherwise have been in breach of the implied Harman undertaking or not authorised for any other reason shall be deemed to have been authorised).

2. Dismiss the amended notice of motion filed by the plaintiff on 14 November 2018 with costs.

3. Dismiss the notice of motion filed 6 March 2019 by the second defendant with no order as to costs.

4. Order the plaintiff to comply by 30 June 2019 with the notice to produce issued by the second defendant on 1 June 2018.