

Originally posted by Alfie1

reply to post by Cassius666





What an extraordinary response. Perhaps you can point out the ad hom attack in my post ?



Of course it is relevant to consider whether there is actually any remote possibility that an Israeli could have been on a 9/11 flight and whether there is a shred of evidence for that. Fact is the concept is beyond absurd and there is no evidence whatsoever.



Waffling on about someones supposed accent on a low grade recording is going to get you nowhere.



edit on 8-6-2011 by Cassius666 because: (no reason given)



For the big puzzle, yes, it is important. Else it would be an off topic subject. However how you perceive the possibility, that an Israeli was on that flight has nothing to do with determening what accent that is. I wrote about that kind of approach in my last post.Its like a moonhauxer saying the landing was faked, because the astronauts couldnt have survived the radiation. Before you take his word on that, youd like to get some more information on that particular detail. Then you learn that there are indeed radiation belts, but that they dont dish out lethal doses. Same here, before one speculates on what an hebrew speaking person would do or not do, you would want to determine what accent that exactly is.One of the posters explained why he thinks that is an hebrew accent.Hoopers reply was "no it aint an hebrew accent. Are we done here?"Thats not a reply, thats flaming. He didnt contribute anything. Nobody is forcing him to contribute to my threads. It aint like I insist on anyone to contribute to my threads, so I dont see a reason for that kind of attitude. I dont think such an behaviour is defensible if you are of drinking age.I have the impression some posters feel they are on some kind of E-War here. An E-War about what I wonder.