Wray: I’ve given no loyalty oath to Trump The FBI director nominee faces a smooth path to confirmation after winning bipartisan praise at the highly-anticipated hearing.

Christopher Wray sailed through his confirmation hearing Wednesday to become the next director of the FBI, winning support from both sides of the aisle for his frequent pledges to remain independent of political pressure — coming from President Donald Trump or anyone else.

The nearly five-hour hearing was highly anticipated, amid the continuing fallout from the James Comey firing and the deepening Russia scandal dogging the White House.


A lawyer and former Department of Justice official, Wray faced a slew of questions about whether Trump demanded loyalty from him, his assessment of Comey’s probe into Hillary Clinton’s private email server and his view of the George W. Bush administration’s interrogation practices.

And he came out largely unscathed.

“It was very positive. Very open, very positive,” Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) said of Wray’s performance, although he said he was withholding final judgment for the time being.

Wray quickly sought to ease concerns from senators about his willingness to take on Trump.

“I believe to my core that there is only one right way to do this job,” Wray said. “And that is with strict independence by the book, playing it straight, faithful to the Constitution, faithful to our laws and faithful to the best practices of the institution, without fear, without favoritism and certainly without regard to any partisan political influence.”

He added, “Anybody who thinks I’d be pulling punches as the FBI director sure doesn’t know me very well.”

Wray also said that he was not asked for any kind of loyalty oath, as Trump allegedly requested of Comey during a private dinner between the two men in January. Comey rebuffed that request and was fired in May, in part, Trump has said, because of Comey’s handling of the FBI’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election and possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Moscow.

If Trump asked that Wray do something unlawful, he said he would “try to talk him out of it, and if that failed, I would resign.”

POLITICO Playbook newsletter Sign up today to receive the #1-rated newsletter in politics Email Sign Up By signing up you agree to receive email newsletters or alerts from POLITICO. You can unsubscribe at any time. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Wray also testified that he did not have conversations with anyone in the White House about the firing of his predecessor. And he said he would “absolutely” report any attempts to interfere with special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe.

“I would consider an effort to tamper with Director Mueller’s investigation to be unacceptable and inappropriate, and [it] would need to be dealt with very sternly and appropriately indeed,” Wray said.

FBI directors are typically installed by wide bipartisan margins, and Wray’s confirmation appears to be on a glide path despite all the questions surrounding loyalty, Comey, Russia and other contentious issues.

Several Democratic senators said during the hearing that they would support Wray’s confirmation. He also has the backing of former Attorney General Eric Holder and former acting Attorney General Sally Yates, both veterans of the Obama administration.

“I’ll be very candid with you, I’m going to vote yes,” California Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, told reporters midway through Wray’s confirmation hearing. “In this man, we have somebody who understands the process of justice … who is committed to the law, the Constitution and the people, and does not look at himself as a servant to the chief executive.”

One early mention of the Trump-Russia investigation at Wednesday’s hearing came as Wray disclosed that the No. 2 official at the Justice Department tried to entice him into taking the FBI job by noting that the inquiry was recently placed in the hands of Mueller, who also once served as FBI director.

Wray said Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein suggested that handing the probe off to Mueller might take some stress off Wray if he took the FBI director post. Rosenstein said “that, in effect, made for a better landscape for me taking on this position,” Wray said.

He also carefully distanced himself from the decision by Comey to publicly discuss the investigation into Clinton’s use of a private email server as secretary of state, noting that policies governing how to handle people who are not charged with a crime are “there for a reason, and I would follow those policies.”

“I can’t imagine a situation where as FBI director, I would be giving a press conference on an uncharged individual, much less talk to the Hill about it,” Wray said. Later, he added, “If you collapse prosecutor and investigator into one role, it’s just one step away from having judge, jury and executioner all rolled into one.”

Making a cameo at Wray’s confirmation hearing: the Donald Trump Jr. email exchange detailing plans to set up a meeting in the heat of the 2016 general election campaign with a Kremlin-linked lawyer who, Trump Jr. was told, was willing to share damaging material about Clinton.

Sen. Lindsey Graham read aloud from parts of the email messages that the president’s eldest son published Tuesday to Twitter. While insisting he had only been following the story from a distance as he was preparing for his hearing, Wray did respond that he expected Mueller would be examining the emails as part of the larger special counsel investigation.

(From left) Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT), Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) are seen as Christopher Wray testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee on his nomination to be the director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation on July 12. | Jim Watson/AFP/Getty Images

The South Carolina Republican, who was quickly dispatched from the 2016 GOP primaries, nonetheless kept pressing Wray for his assessment on whether it’s legally questionable for presidential candidates to be talking with foreign nationals for opposition research.

“You’re going to be the director of the FBI, pal,” Graham said. “So here’s what I want you to tell every politician: If you get a call from somebody suggesting that a foreign government wants to help you by disparaging your opponent, tell us all to call the FBI.”

Wray replied: “To the members of this committee, any threat or effort to interfere with our elections from any nation-state or any non-state actor is the kind of the thing the FBI would want to know.”

Later in the exchange, Graham pressed Wray to weigh in on Trump’s repeated public remarks disparaging the Mueller probe as a “witch hunt.”

The FBI nominee’s answer: “I do not consider Director Mueller to be on a witch hunt.”

Wray was pressed repeatedly by senators to give responses that contradicted Trump or downplayed the White House’s power over the FBI. “I don’t think the White House should be playing a role in prosecutorial decisions, period,” he told Nebraska GOP Sen. Ben Sasse.

Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) had this comment on how Wray should remain apolitical: “I want you to be Socrates. I want you to be Dirty Harry with the bad guys.”

In an exchange with Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.), Wray said FBI agents had their “head down” doing their work and he didn’t sense the same low morale that Trump described when he fired Comey.

“You don’t think Director Comey is a nut job?” Franken asked.

“That’s never been my experience,” Wray replied.

Democratic senators also raised questions about Wray’s involvement in the counterterrorism policies of the Bush administration, when he was a top official at the Justice Department.

Feinstein asked Wray about his role in the controversial Bush-era anti-terror tactics and legal memos written by then-Justice Department official John Yoo outlining the basis for using enhanced interrogation techniques against terrorism suspects. Wray denied playing a role in approving the highly controversial memos.

“I can tell you that during my time as principal associate deputy attorney general, to my recollection, I never reviewed, much less provided comments on or input on and much less approved any memo from John Yoo on this topic,” Wray told Feinstein. “I understand that he thinks it’s possible he might have. I can only tell this committee that I have no recollection whatsoever of that. And it’s the kind of thing I think I would remember.”

Yoo, who authored some of the memos, had previously testified that Wray may have received and commented on drafts of them at the time while working in the Bush Justice Department. Feinstein cited that testimony while questioning Wray on Wednesday, but the nominee said the Office of Legal Counsel, which issued the memos, was not part of his portfolio at the time.

“My view is that torture is wrong,” Wray told the committee.

In advance of the hearing, key committee members from both parties said they had found no major red flags in Wray, a veteran corporate lawyer who spent four years at the Department of Justice, mostly after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.

“It’s a demanding job that requires a keen understanding of the law, sound management skills, calmness under significant pressure, and a very level head,” the committee’s chairman, Chuck Grassley of Iowa, said in his opening remarks. “From what I’ve seen so far from meetings with Mr. Wray and from looking at his record, he appears to possess these qualifications.”

Grassley added: “In reviewing his record, I’ve seen Mr. Wray’s commitment to independence.”

Wray was announced as Trump’s pick on June 7, just one day before Comey testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee.

Trump, who fired Comey on May 8, cycled through several other potential candidates for the job before settling on Wray, including Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn (R-Texas), former Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.), former Transportation Security Administration Administrator John Pistole and Andrew McCabe, the bureau’s current acting director.

Heading into his hearing, Wray also faced questions about his experience handling major national security issues — central to the bureau’s mission of overseeing key counterterrorism issues in the wake of Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Pressed on his résumé by Grassley — Wray was head of the Justice Department’s criminal division from 2003 to 2005 — the FBI nominee replied that counterterrorism and counterespionage issues were a direct part of his oversight responsibilities.

“Well over 50 percent of my time in those four years was focused on those very kinds of issues,” Wray said.

The committee did not indicate when it will vote on Wray’s nomination. Grassley has said he would like to see Wray confirmed before the now-delayed August recess.

Madeline Conway contributed to this report.