It is nine days now since my last technical post with no response or counter to it from you. The ground rules we agreed to say that since you did not respond within seven days that you have forfeited your turn on that topic. Since you didn't respond it has to be assumed that you had no answers to my critique of the NIST and ARUP analysis problems, which shows that column 79 could not have lost enough lateral support to cause it to buckle to begin the collapse as those analyses purport.



However, it is now your turn to start another topic, if you choose to continue this debate.