I Am Hollywood5

True Bro





PC elitist snob prick

Posts: 732

True Bro Ghosts Maverick Quote Select Post

Select Post Deselect Post

Deselect Post Link to Post

Link to Post Member Give Gift

Member Back to Top Post by I Am Hollywood5 on I have a feeling it's like the MSBS with 0.9/0.8 multipliers to the limbs, but even then it still makes the AK-12 and R5 totally useless. They might as well just remove those guns from the game completely now.



Drift0r said it's a 3-5 kill and in most of the footage I saw it was a 3HK up close but I did see occasional 2HKs. So it's gotta be 2-shots to the torso only or something like that.



The sniper version is also stupidly OP.

42

True Bro







Bingo Bango Bongo

Posts: 1,588

True Bro Ghosts Maverick Mousey likes this Quote Select Post

Select Post Deselect Post

Deselect Post Link to Post

Link to Post Member Give Gift

Member Back to Top Post by 42 on I Am Hollywood5 said: Why do you keep it from the community? What do you gain from that? Smug feeling



Except it's Marvel who told Mousey not to tell. Check your facts. There are plenty of logical reasons not to; one of them might be because the information is not fully complete. As you said yourself, this 2HK might only apply to shots to the torso and head. It's not uncommon to verify findings to make sure they are of the utmost accuracy. Except it's Marvel who told Mousey not to tell. Check your facts. There are plenty of logical reasons not to; one of them might be because the information is not fully complete. As you said yourself, this 2HK might only apply to shots to the torso and head. It's not uncommon to verify findings to make sure they are of the utmost accuracy.

wittyscorpion

True Brorange







All warfare is based on deception.

Posts: 8,598

True Brorange Ghosts Maverick Quote Select Post

Select Post Deselect Post

Deselect Post Link to Post

Link to Post Member Give Gift

Member Back to Top Post by wittyscorpion on



1) it is definitely not an OP weapon. For medium range on the short side I still do better with Honey Badger, and for medium range on the long side there are many options that are still better;

2) the weapon is interesting enough to provide novelty. IMHO as an DLC gun it is significantly better than Peacekeeper in BO2;

3) Experimented with burst attachment for one game. Feels terrible.

4) Experimented with semi attachment in Squad (veteran difficulty) for a few games. Feels "good", but did not look into whether it is 2HK max, I suspect it is because I was able to win gun fights against "veteran" AIs that I thought I would otherwise lose;



In a nutshell: I think that they did it as an DLC gun just right. If you don't buy DLC, you are not losing out "competitively"; if you buy the DLC, the gun is interesting enough so you won't regret it. I a) played with this weapon myself, b) got into gun fight on the receiving end, and c) watched streaming from PWNSTARZdotCOM (fast forward to 6 hour 40 minutes mark for DLC) quite a bit, and below are my impressions:1) it is definitely not an OP weapon. For medium range on the short side I still do better with Honey Badger, and for medium range on the long side there are many options that are still better;2) the weapon is interesting enough to provide novelty. IMHO as an DLC gun it is significantly better than Peacekeeper in BO2;3) Experimented with burst attachment for one game. Feels terrible.4) Experimented with semi attachment in Squad (veteran difficulty) for a few games. Feels "good", but did not look into whether it is 2HK max, I suspect it is because I was able to win gun fights against "veteran" AIs that I thought I would otherwise lose;In a nutshell: I think that they did it as an DLC gun just right. If you don't buy DLC, you are not losing out "competitively"; if you buy the DLC, the gun is interesting enough so you won't regret it.

r00stad00ks

True Bro





Posts: 50

True Bro Ghosts Maverick Quote Select Post

Select Post Deselect Post

Deselect Post Link to Post

Link to Post Member Give Gift

Member Back to Top Post by r00stad00ks on Did some messing around today with it and it looks like the 2 hit is about 7 and a half meters tops and after wall testing it looks to have more recoil with a grip then the remington without a grip and about the same as the ak but it's less predictable. When I say the same as the ak I mean the amount of spread the pattern is more similar to the ameli. All in all this thing is ok but the remington is still a generally better AR.

banana

True Banana







Zoro > Law

Posts: 1,575

True Banana Ghosts Maverick Quote Select Post

Select Post Deselect Post

Deselect Post Link to Post

Link to Post Member Give Gift

Member Back to Top Post by banana on The stats are up and with muzzle brake it seems to be a 7.4 m 2hk (don't quote me on this)

Maverick grip + muzzle break seems to be the best set-up. I'd use it over the sc2010.

The sniper has less recoil, moves faster, higher fire rate, less idle than the lynx (idk about the leg multipliers)



Wouldn't say pay to win but they are definitely high to top tier





probaddie

True Bro





You're triggering my intelligence

Posts: 11,043

True Bro Ghosts Maverick Quote Select Post

Select Post Deselect Post

Deselect Post Link to Post

Link to Post Member Give Gift

Member Back to Top Post by probaddie on banana said:

Maverick grip + muzzle break seems to be the best set-up. I'd use it over the sc2010.

The sniper has less recoil, moves faster, higher fire rate, less idle than the lynx (idk about the leg multipliers)



Wouldn't say pay to win but they are definitely high to top tier



The stats are up and with muzzle brake it seems to be a 7.4 m 2hk (don't quote me on this)Maverick grip + muzzle break seems to be the best set-up. I'd use it over the sc2010.Thehas less recoil, moves faster, higher fire rate, less idle than the lynx (idk about the leg multipliers)Wouldn't say pay to win but they are definitely high to top tier



With Muzzle Brake, it's a 2HK out to 307 units (7.80 m) whenever both bullets strike the body or head or you strike the head and a limb. Otherwise, it's at least a 3HK.

With Muzzle Brake, it's a 2HK out to 307 units (7.80 m) whenever both bullets strike the body or headyou strike the head and a limb. Otherwise, it's at least a 3HK.

qupie

True Bro





Posts: 12,395

True Bro Ghosts Maverick Quote Select Post

Select Post Deselect Post

Deselect Post Link to Post

Link to Post Member Give Gift

Member Back to Top Post by qupie on Very short 2 hk range only to the body, yeah, no thanks... In close firefights I tent to spray a little more. I think I can count the number of 2 hk I got on one hand. On long range it is clearly outclassed by at least 75% of the other AR, and on close range, I would still prefer a higher ROF over a chance of a 2hk really close range. Or use the shotgun attachment.

I Am Hollywood5

True Bro





PC elitist snob prick

Posts: 732

True Bro Ghosts Maverick Quote Select Post

Select Post Deselect Post

Deselect Post Link to Post

Link to Post Member Give Gift

Member Back to Top Post by I Am Hollywood5 on Yeah IW was very conservative with this weapon, which is highly unusual for them... the IW of old days would have given this thing a 2HK to the foot out to 30 meters. I guess I'd prefer it to be underpowered than overpowered, but hopefully they give it a little buff in the future. If it's only a 2HK when both shots are body shots, then I think it's fair to have a 15-20 meter range.



Or they could have made this thing a 550 RPM 50-30 damage gun with good range, high recoil, and a 20-round mag, and it would feel a lot different than the AK12 or R5. But that's just what I would have done