Opinion Tulip mania: the classic story of a Dutch financial bubble is mostly wrong ‘No one drowned themselves in canals. I found not a single bankrupt who could be identified as someone dealt the fatal financial blow by tulip mania’ BL PREMIUM

Right now it’s bitcoin. But in the past we’ve had dotcom stocks, the 1929 crash, 19th-century railways and the South Sea Bubble of 1720. All these were compared by contemporaries to "tulip mania", the Dutch financial craze for tulip bulbs in the 1630s. Bitcoin, according some sceptics, is "tulip mania 2.0". Why this lasting fixation on tulip mania? It certainly makes an exciting story, one that has become a byword for insanity in the markets. The same aspects of it are constantly repeated, whether by casual tweeters or in widely read economics textbooks by luminaries such as John Kenneth Galbraith. Tulip mania was irrational, the story goes. Tulip mania was a frenzy. Everyone in the Netherlands was involved, from chimney-sweeps to aristocrats. The same tulip bulb, or rather tulip future, was traded sometimes 10 times a day. No one wanted the bulbs, only the profits — it was a phenomenon of pure greed. Tulips were sold for crazy prices — the price of houses — and fortunes were won an...