May 25, 2014

An example of the colonized goy mind

is when David Duke says

the Protocols of Zion

are "a work of imagination."

"You believe the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. But what is that beside the unquestionable and historic conspiracy which we have carried out, and which we have never denied because you have never had the courage to charge us with it?" (The Real Case Against the Jews, by Marcus Eli Ravage

Century Magazine, January, 1928)



by Henry Makow Ph.D.



Last week, two excited readers sent a link to a new video by David Duke which promised an analysis of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. I have great respect for both David Duke and the Protocols, which I regard as 100% authentic, so I had

high expectations.

Imagine my dismay when right off the bat, Duke tells us

it doesn't matter if the Protocols are a "forgery" because they are a "work of imagination" like George Orwell's dystopia 1984.



Duke says The Protocols hold imaginative truth comparable to Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet (on the subject of love.) He inserts a 30-second segment from the movie Romeo and Juliet to illustrate this point. This in the first three-minutes of a video ostensibly devoted to the

Protocols of Zion?





Turns

out Duke is

asking for $100 donations so he can publish a handsome new "leather-bound," "illustrated"

edition of the Protocols at an "affordable" price.

People who donate more than $100 will get his autograph and low-numbered versions.

Next to the Bible, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is the most important book in print today.

The blueprint of the New World Order, it contains priceless insights into the Cabalist Jewish bankers' plans for world tyranny and their methodology.



It is beyond pathetic that a respected white nationalist leader like David Duke thinks they are "a work of imagination." In fact, they are indispensable to understanding mankind's tragic past, present and future.

The video hardly cites the Protocols, let alone analyzes it. Instead, Duke provides examples of how the Protocols' promise of Jewish domination has been realized. Most readers of Duke's excellent books and videos will already be familiar with these examples, i.e the Fed, the mass media etc..

The Protocols are available online and in numerous inexpensive editions on Amazon and elsewhere. Do we really need a "leather bound" edition?





The otherwise brilliant Michael Hoffman has also disparaged the Protocols.



What do we expect the Cabalists to say when their game-plan was leaked?



Naturally, they stigmatized it as "anti Semitic" so now everyone is too afraid to read or admit it is true. This hate-filled satanic document is not "anti Semitic;" it is anti-goyim. But the goyim are too feckless to recognize this. It is the work of a secret cabal that most Jews would reject if they believed it actually existed. It is not a reflection on any Jews I know.







THE IMPORT OF THE PROTOCOLS



The western world has been conquered and colonized by Cabalist (Illuminati) Jews using Gentile Freemason traitors as their fronts and proxies.This conquest did not involve armies but was financial and cultural in character. They took control of government credit, campaign finance, corporations, the mass media, education and culture in general. The conquest is now complete and most people don't realize it has taken place.



Wars, depression and "social progress" in general all have been contrived with one end in view, to undermine the heritage, coherence and power of European Christians, the only people Cabalist Jews view as rivals.



The Protocols are necessary to understanding the true diabolical character of the NWO agenda. In my book Illuminati, (pp.113-123) I summarize the main passages. These show that "liberalism" was mainly a ruse used to put Jewish proxies in power. There is no genuine desire to uplift society materially or spiritually.



On the contrary, the Protocols explicitly state that their intention is to "seize the property of others" (i.e. the goyim) and "bring all governments into subjection to our super-government." (Protocols 1)



Does that sound like "a work of imagination" to you?



The next chapters detail the methods by which cabalist bankers have destroyed Christian civilization: "The principal object of our directorate is...to debase the public mind...head it away from serious reflection calculated to arouse resistance; to distract the forces of the mind towards a sham fight of empty eloquence." (Protocols 5)



Doesn't this describe politics today?



"We further distract the masses with amusements, games,..art..sports...people will begin to talk in the same tones as we because we alone shall be offering them shall be offering them new directions for thought..of course through such persons who will not be suspected of solidarity with us." (Protocols, 13)



The goyim "can amuse themselves until the hour strikes..." (2)





The Protocols explain that we are complicit in their own debasement and enslavement: "The people will know that upon these leaders will depend its earnings, gratification and the receipt of all kinds of benefits." (10)



"All nations will be swallowed up in the pursuit of gain and in the race for it, will not take note of their common foe." (4)



The Protocols of the Elders of Zion are anything but an artistic creation or dystopic prophesy.

Although written more than 100 years ago, they are obviously the blueprint of today's world.



The Illuminati (Masonic) Jewish conquest is now a fait accompli. They stigmatize political opponents as "bigots" and "terrorists," although they are behind most terror, incl. 9-11. People lose their jobs for resisting their attack on marriage and family. NSA surveillance is designed to nip resistance in the bud.



But what need they fear when leaders like David Duke can't even appreciate the Protocols?







"Protocols of Zion" is the NWO Blueprint

-----------Zionism - How the Elders Use Anti Semitism to Control Jews ---------- Voters reject Masonic Jewish Superstate (i.e. EU) Makow: "Protocols of Zion" is the NWO Blueprint ---------- Protocols Forgery Argument is Flawed ---------- Maurice Joly Plagiarized Protocols, Not Vice-Versa ---------- Fritz Springmeier's Iluminati Bro'mance Stanley - Why I Admire David Duke who I believe cannot recognize the truth (of the Protocols) when he sees it.My point has always been that the Protocols are disputed. Johann Andreascannot be refuted, and any disputation concerning it pertains to its facts, not its provenance.How were our people moved away from Entdecktes Judenthum and toward the Protocols? It's a question that deserves an answer. I have never seen anyone even try to answer it. If Entdecktes Judenthum received the publicity which the Protocols have received, the Enemies of Truth would go out of their minds because its consists of 2,000 pages of the deadliest documentary information on Judaism ever assembled. Supreme Court Justice Scalia would not be able to give speeches at Talmud societies (as he has done under the patronage of his colleague Nathan Lewin) and still call himself a Catholic Conservative, if Entdecktes Judenthum was in broad circulation. Much of the ignorance and many of the evils of our day would be in retreat. It's possible that Judaism would never recover short of a Fahrenheit 451-type of book burning.As for the language barrier, the Third Reich had the resources of the state at its disposal and the talents of some of the finest philologists and translators in the world. A handsome English edition could have been produced, published and exported. Instead, Hitler staked his worldview on the thin gruel of the disputed Protocols. This is like having a choice between a starship and an ox-cart, and choosing the ox-cart. People tell me that this was no conspiracy. I believe it has all the hallmarks of deliberate misdirection; a misdirection which continues to this day.Dr. Makow says the Protocols are prima facie genuine. In other words, by the contents of the text he can adduce the origin of the text. No credible historian would accept such a linkage, but it appears that professional standards of historiography matter very little in the Right wing.I respect Dr. Makow for many of his other views, but not in this matter.Sincerely,Michael HoffmanCoeur d'Alene, Idaho U.S.A.www.revisionisthistory.org