comments ( 97 )

22/03/14 14:23 #1 (Archived) Why do you want ban there weapon?

22/03/14 14:52 #2 ADi (Archived) becuase both of these weapons are "one-shot" kill weapons (well thats how many players are feeling like when they got killed by these weapons)



1 edits

22/03/14 14:58 #3 hadoukenzzz (Archived) It's more a combination of the weapons power and the poor netcode. Combine those two and the weapons often seem overpowered.

22/03/14 15:20 #5 PhanTOM (Archived) BAN BOTH

22/03/14 15:23 #7 Brav3hearT (Archived) Keep the guns fuck the system :)

22/03/14 15:25 #8 (Archived) Why now? these weapons are like this since the beginning

22/03/14 15:26 #9 lordz (Archived) ban both

22/03/14 15:29 #10 ADi (Archived) BAN IT BAN IT!

22/03/14 15:42 #11 (Archived) Both should stay please !



if you want people to use different weapons, make them play on a real game mode and on a real game

22/03/14 15:53 #12 (Archived) Chose to ban them both...



At least with other weapons, the poor quality of the netcode doesn't seem to create "one-shot" kills...

22/03/14 15:54 #13 dpX_nnowa (Archived) lenoob thats because the other weapons does not ahve that high damage.

22/03/14 15:55 #14 Frantic- (Archived) Personally I dont see the reason to ban this. To me it doesnt happen all that often and its definately not a reason to ban 2 weapons for it. Seems a little drastic to me. I respect others opinions and can see how it's annoying though. But like i said, in my opinion it's a bit of a drastic action.

22/03/14 15:58 #15 dpX_nnowa (Archived) frantic. basically i shouldnt have made the post lol.

22/03/14 16:02 #16 (Archived)



It's sad to ban them but if it is the only way, so be it...

People who are denying the inherent problems of these weapons are dishonest :)



http://www.esl.eu/eu/bf4/forum...g=8652171&postcount=96



Even with damages at 45&40, it's a problem seeing that these weapons are (or seem) to be bugged as hell...It's sad to ban them but if it is the only way, so be it...People who are denying the inherent problems of these weapons are dishonest :) 1 edits

22/03/14 16:38 #17 vS-Tyoooo (Archived) allowed just one weapon? As on BF3 would be nice right?

22/03/14 16:48 #18 dpX_nnowa (Archived)



nothing. i wonder why my post created this but this http://www.esl.eu/eu/bf4/forum...3581/?lastvisit=1395501280 nothing.

22/03/14 17:11 #19 DelArco (Archived) I would ban both just for a more skill-rewarding game

22/03/14 17:57 #20 FrD (Archived) "I would ban both just for a more skill-rewarding game"



+1 true

22/03/14 18:02 #21 Sh33p (Archived) Is there a time limit or a poll deadline? When can we see a change in rules?(if there will be any)...

22/03/14 18:09 #22 (Archived) "I would ban both just for a more skill-rewarding game"

Agreed! +1

22/03/14 18:10 #23 Epic (Archived) +1 DelArco

22/03/14 18:17 #24 DRUNKKZ3 (Archived) I had to agree with a spanish guy for once in my life, +1 DelArco

22/03/14 18:20 #25 luesse (Archived) Best poll ever.

22/03/14 18:30 #26 Var3la (Archived) i trade both weapons for good hitreg

22/03/14 18:44 #27 xDarkDomainx (Archived) http://www.esl.eu/eu/bf4/forum...3581/?lastvisit=1395501280 - this is the post that sparked the debate

22/03/14 18:57 #28 ADi (Archived) Link not found

22/03/14 19:20 #30 vicius (Archived) BAN BOTH

22/03/14 19:22 #31 ADi (Archived) @NoWa thx

22/03/14 19:22 #32 eiN0x (Archived) Ban both

22/03/14 20:20 #33 Relaaaaaa (Archived) Ban them and the hipfire gameplay they accentuated

22/03/14 20:34 #34 Persown (Archived) Ban Scar-H, too powerfull!

22/03/14 20:41 #35 Sh33p (Archived) either both, or none FFS

22/03/14 22:57 #36 najs (Archived) ban BF4

22/03/14 22:59 #37 (Archived) Ban ROCKETS, of ANY KIND instead... or ALL EXPLOSIVES except grenades. That would make a lot more sense, IMHO...

23/03/14 03:14 #38 (Archived) Ban only one is retarded :)

23/03/14 04:34 #39 Tonyyy (Archived) BAN BOTH

23/03/14 10:34 #41 (Archived) Ban both, ofc. ( Maybe only m16a4/m416 and aek/ak12 rule for different sides? :D)

23/03/14 11:03 #42 (Archived) When will we have the results?

23/03/14 11:09 #43 Hupsux (Archived) Why do the results have to be hidden??

23/03/14 11:23 #44 Hupsux (Archived) Even though why are these polls public for everyone when just some casuals and vs heroes can come here to ban these weapons only because they couldnt handle the scarh..



Imagine a scenario where a guy like mil gets 50 casuals on his side and weapons get banned, when teams like dignitas and mym would like to keep the weapons in competitions (just speaking metaforically, not saying that they would want to)

but weapons get banned because of people getting pissed in vs of dying.. or vice versa



The poll should be made for only EMS groupstage/final teams and then maybe make another poll for for banning weapons from vs for example.



And I assume that everyone knows that these weapons dont 1shot, the game is just so bugged that when you get shot by enemy with these weapons it just doesnt show you the red hitmarks on your screen when you get hit few times before the leathal hit. Giving you an illusion of being oneshotted.



#If you cant stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen

BR Hupsux, the brother, the legend.



2 edits

23/03/14 11:57 #45 najs (Archived) wheres the poll to ban the players who want to ban these weapons?

23/03/14 12:03 #46 misiek (Archived) ban both lulz @drunkz

23/03/14 13:38 #47 duckiechan (Archived) Since these two weapons does not change how the game is played, they are not gamebreaking. No reason for banning them. Banning them will only make the game more about tickrate and less about skill.

23/03/14 14:23 #48 lif3 (Archived) If you ban these weapon, go allow just one weapon like in bf3. Ban just 2 weapon had no sense.

23/03/14 14:36 #49 lordz (Archived) #47 - You made my day, thanks for that.