Richard Grant continues his theological experiment:

Creationists (and I include proponents of so-called Intelligent Design’ in that) don’t understand science, obviously: but they also fail to understand faith. Creationism is used as a proof, as evidence for the existence of (a) God...This is not a philosophical objection: I’m not saying that faith fails to be faith if there’s proof. I’m saying that if your proof’ is shown to be false then you’re utterly screwed. So if you tie your faith to a proof’ you actually end up trying to prove that your proof is true, rather than seeking out truth’. Which is the cleft stick Creationists find themselves in.