The Bronx District Attorney’s Office became the first in the city on Monday to publicly release a “naughty list” of NYPD members whose credibility could lead to criminal cases being tossed.

The heavily redacted records, obtained by The Post through a Freedom of Information request, names 75 current and former officers, sergeants and lieutenants who have given questionable testimony in criminal cases or have had evidence tossed for unconstitutional policing.

At least three of the cops were red-flagged for lying — including one NYPD captain, the records show.

Dozens of other officers were included in the 11 pages of three separate adverse credibility lists reviewed by The Post — but their names were redacted because some of the cases are sealed.

In one of the cases, a federal judge threw out the gun arrest of Tyqaun Williams in 2011 after ruling that Officer Christopher Lopez had no reason for a traffic stop, court records show.

Williams was a passenger in a rental car on March 14, 2011, when Lopez and his partner, Steven Lopez, stopped the Hyundai in a “high-crime area” of Morris Heights, near the intersection of University and West Tremont avenues, for “a thin black plastic frame around the edges of its rear license plate,” court papers say.

Prosecutors dropped the case after the judge ruled that the stop was unconstitutional — and Christopher Lopez and his partner landed on the adverse credibility list.

Two other cops named were Sabrina Alicea and Waikiria Velez — whose statements in a June 2015 crash, which killed one and left another brain-dead — were contradicted by surveillance video, the DA’s records say.

Detective Winston McDonald made the list for lying about being robbed at knife point in early 2016 — and Capt. David Dent landed on the list after he was caught fudging transit crime numbers.

Andrew Stengel, a former prosecutor with the Manhattan DA’s Office, cheered the release of the documents.

The NYPD members could not be reached for comment Monday.

“Releasing the list is a victory for transparency for people who have been arrested in Bronx County, but it doesn’t solve all the problems,” he told The Post. “It’s a good step forward but by no means is this list comprehensive.”

The city’s police union responded to the release by slamming the Bronx DA’s prosecution record and attacking the “anti-cop activists” who requested the lists to smear “honest, hard-working police officers.”

“It’s sad to see our district attorneys continuing to undermine their own work. Prosecutors are well aware that judges discount or discard police testimony for a variety of reasons, including the judge’s own biases,” said PBA President Patrick Lynch.

The Post has requested similar lists from the four other DA offices in the city, but those requests have been denied.

Stengel, who is suing the Manhattan DA’s Office to force the release of their list, claims his review shows at least one cop who allegedly lied to a grand jury is missing from the Bronx DA’s tally.

In May, The Post obtained internal records from the Manhattan DA that revealed red flags against 31 NYPD officers — five of whom had been called to testify in criminal cases. The Manhattan DA’s Office previously denied they keep a “naughty list.”

The Legal Aid Society lauded the disclosure as a win for transparency but noted “it is not the last step.”

“We must continue to demand more public access to internal police misconduct information to allow the public to hold police and the administrations that protect them accountable,” said staff attorney Cynthia Conti-Cook.

In 2014, the NYPD said it started collecting the list from DAs offices and created an Adverse Credibility Committee to review the rulings. The department monitors the findings for any potential “re-training, re-assignment or, where warranted, a referral to the Internal Affairs Bureau.”

“It is important to note that the Department does not consider every adversarial judicial finding as indicative of a credibility issue for a member of the Department,” an NYPD spokeswoman said, noting there is no appeal process for the rulings.

The Bronx DA’s office declined to comment.