No baited drumlines will be set this summer after concerns over program’s impact on great whites leads to EPA recommendation

This article is more than 6 years old

This article is more than 6 years old

Baited drumlines will not be deployed in Western Australia this summer after the Environmental Protection Authority recommended that the state’s controversial shark culling program not be extended, citing “a high degree of scientific uncertainty” about the impact of drumlines on the great white shark population.

Under the WA government’s proposal – which followed a three-month trial earlier this year – more than 70 hooks would be strung about 1km off popular beaches in Perth and the state’s south-west each summer for the next three years.

The state government’s own environmental assessment estimated about 25 great whites, a protected species under state and commonwealth regulations, would be snared on the hooks.

But on Thursday the EPA chairman, Paul Vogel, said a CSIRO review of the government’s estimates “stated there remained too much uncertainty in the available information and evidence about the south-western white shark population, population trends and the bycatch from commercial fisheries”.

“In view of these uncertainties, the EPA has adopted a cautious approach by recommending against the proposal,” he said.

The EPA’s recommendation is open to public appeal for two weeks, with a final decision on the shark cull to be made in October by the WA environment minister, Albert Jacobs. The program also needs to be approved by the federal environment minister, Greg Hunt.

Vogel said the EPA had only assessed the impact of the drumlines on the environment. “The minister, in making his final decision, may take other matters into consideration,” he said.

The WA premier, Colin Barnett, told parliament he was disappointed by the decision, but it was “very unlikely” the government would appeal

“That means it will not be possible to have drum lines over this summer. If we were to do so there would clearly be court challenges and you would never get there,” he said.

Barnett said Perth beaches were “pretty well safe” due to air patrols, but he could not say the same for beaches in the state’s south-west, where the government would have to rethink how it could provide greater protection.

“I cannot look the people in the south-west in the face and say ‘your beaches are safe, your diving [and] surfing conditions are safe’ because I don’t believe they are.”



Hunt has previously said that he would approve the cull only if it underwent a full environmental assessment.

A spokeswoman for his office said on Thursday Hunt would “look very carefully at the Western Australian assessment report, the advice of the department, and the public submissions received during the public environmental review”.

The EPA’s study was the subject of unprecedented public interest. It received nearly 7,000 submissions and and two petitions with more than 25,000 signatories.

Both the WA and federal governments had to grant exemptions from their own environmental protection regulations in order to lay the drumlines, which enabled the capture of 172 sharks between January and April.

The policy allowing for the culling of any sharks longer than 3m was introduced after seven lethal shark attacks in three years off West Australian beaches.

Fifty of the sharks, none of them great whites, were larger than 3m and were shot by contractors. Twenty sharks, 14 of them under 3m, were found dead on the baited hooks before crews reached them. Ninety sharks were tagged and released.

The cull has been the subject of international condemnation, including from actor Ricky Gervais and billionaire businessman Richard Branson. Protests held on beaches around the world drew thousands and polls have consistently shown that Australians oppose the measure.

The EPA was criticised in March for declining to assess the three-month trial. Vogel told Perth radio that he believed its environmental impact would be “negligible”.

A legal challenge to the bait-and-kill policy by marine activists Sea Shepherd was rejected by the WA supreme court in March.

WA Greens MP Lynn MacLaren, a strident critic of the program, said the EPA’s recommendation was “a cause for celebration”.

“It follows the enormous efforts of thousands of Western Australians from all backgrounds who have stood up to the Barnett government to protect our marine environment,” she said.

“Both Labor and Liberal governments in WA have form in overriding EPA recommendations in WA so the battle is far from over – but the message to premier Barnett and federal minister Hunt is clear: culling is not the answer.”