That's incorrect. Market capitalization is calculated by multiplying a company's shares outstanding by the current market price of one share. As long as a coin has an ownership and can be traded, it is considered an outstanding share."all country coins would still be listed as someone (developer) owns them" ---> it should. (I should be corrected here - if the dev. are allowed to sell the premine then they are outstanding shares, otherwise they re not). CMC should not list coin that has a sign of market manipulation but it is incorrect to not count the premine.For NEM, all regular stakes now have an owner and can be sold or traded. That the owner does not request to put his share on an exchange does not mean it is not an outstanding share. That Bill Gates do not put his Microsoft shares on an exchange does not change Microsoft market cap.

This was the main problem that country coins exploited to get on top of the list, even though 50 to 70 percent were not tradable and were "locked" for future release to a country.Only stakes that are available for trade on asset exchanges should be counted to calculate market cap --coinmarketcap will not make the same mistake as they did with country coin, artificially inflating the ranking. I think he already learnt his lesson,

"all country coins would still be listed as someone (developer) owns them" ---> it should. (I should be corrected here - if the dev. are allowed to sell the premine then they are outstanding shares, otherwise they re not). CMC should not list coin that has a sign of market manipulation but it is incorrect to not count the premine.

I think it should not be listed at all -- not on regular list -- until official launch. Same should apply to mediasafe.Maybe there can be separate list for assets. It would be fine on that list

In the case of country, the coins are locked up for a purpose so they are not outstanding shares. In the case of NEM, no regular share is locked up. For example: any stakeholder can request a token and sell it tomorrow. It is real money and completely actionable. If NEM stake shoot up to 10.000$ tomorrow, I am sure the tokens will be running out pretty fast. It does not stop there. I am open to list else where as long as there are requests so ALL shares are actually tradable and sellable.I did not talk with Gliss yet but you can bet that NEM will be listed in CMC before the official launch as long as he think maidsafe could be there.

This was the main problem that country coins exploited to get on top of the list, even though 50 to 70 percent were not tradable and were "locked" for future release to a country.Only stakes that are available for trade on asset exchanges should be counted to calculate market cap --coinmarketcap will not make the same mistake as they did with country coin, artificially inflating the ranking. I think he already learnt his lesson,

"all country coins would still be listed as someone (developer) owns them" ---> it should. (I should be corrected here - if the dev. are allowed to sell the premine then they are outstanding shares, otherwise they re not). CMC should not list coin that has a sign of market manipulation but it is incorrect to not count the premine.

How much do you want to bet? :pGliss also has the requirement that the trading must be on atleast one exchange with a good trackrecord and a good API. I don't think he will implement his own implementation for the AE just for one asset. So I wouldn't be so sure about getting listed

In the case of country, the coins are locked up for a purpose so they are not outstanding shares. In the case of NEM, no regular share is locked up. For example: any stakeholder can request a token and sell it tomorrow. It is real money and completely actionable. If NEM stake shoot up to 10.000$ tomorrow, I am sure the tokens will be running out pretty fast. It does not stop there. I am open to list else where as long as there are requests so ALL shares are actually tradable and sellable.I did not talk with Gliss yet but you can bet that NEM will be listed in CMC before the official launch as long as he think maidsafe could be there.

This was the main problem that country coins exploited to get on top of the list, even though 50 to 70 percent were not tradable and were "locked" for future release to a country.Only stakes that are available for trade on asset exchanges should be counted to calculate market cap --coinmarketcap will not make the same mistake as they did with country coin, artificially inflating the ranking. I think he already learnt his lesson,

"all country coins would still be listed as someone (developer) owns them" ---> it should. (I should be corrected here - if the dev. are allowed to sell the premine then they are outstanding shares, otherwise they re not). CMC should not list coin that has a sign of market manipulation but it is incorrect to not count the premine.

How much do you want to bet? :pGliss also has the requirement that the trading must be on atleast one exchange with a good trackrecord and a good API. I don't think he will implement his own implementation for the AE just for one asset. So I wouldn't be so sure about getting listed

In the case of country, the coins are locked up for a purpose so they are not outstanding shares. In the case of NEM, no regular share is locked up. For example: any stakeholder can request a token and sell it tomorrow. It is real money and completely actionable. If NEM stake shoot up to 10.000$ tomorrow, I am sure the tokens will be running out pretty fast. It does not stop there. I am open to list else where as long as there are requests so ALL shares are actually tradable and sellable.I did not talk with Gliss yet but you can bet that NEM will be listed in CMC before the official launch as long as he think maidsafe could be there.

This was the main problem that country coins exploited to get on top of the list, even though 50 to 70 percent were not tradable and were "locked" for future release to a country.Only stakes that are available for trade on asset exchanges should be counted to calculate market cap --coinmarketcap will not make the same mistake as they did with country coin, artificially inflating the ranking. I think he already learnt his lesson,

"all country coins would still be listed as someone (developer) owns them" ---> it should. (I should be corrected here - if the dev. are allowed to sell the premine then they are outstanding shares, otherwise they re not). CMC should not list coin that has a sign of market manipulation but it is incorrect to not count the premine.

I think it should not be listed at all -- not on regular list -- until official launch. Same should apply to mediasafe.Maybe there can be separate list for assets. It would be fine on that list

How much do you want to bet? :pGliss also has the requirement that the trading must be on atleast one exchange with a good trackrecord and a good API. I don't think he will implement his own implementation for the AE just for one asset. So I wouldn't be so sure about getting listed

In the case of country, the coins are locked up for a purpose so they are not outstanding shares. In the case of NEM, no regular share is locked up. For example: any stakeholder can request a token and sell it tomorrow. It is real money and completely actionable. If NEM stake shoot up to 10.000$ tomorrow, I am sure the tokens will be running out pretty fast. It does not stop there. I am open to list else where as long as there are requests so ALL shares are actually tradable and sellable.I did not talk with Gliss yet but you can bet that NEM will be listed in CMC before the official launch as long as he think maidsafe could be there.

This was the main problem that country coins exploited to get on top of the list, even though 50 to 70 percent were not tradable and were "locked" for future release to a country.Only stakes that are available for trade on asset exchanges should be counted to calculate market cap --coinmarketcap will not make the same mistake as they did with country coin, artificially inflating the ranking. I think he already learnt his lesson,

"all country coins would still be listed as someone (developer) owns them" ---> it should. (I should be corrected here - if the dev. are allowed to sell the premine then they are outstanding shares, otherwise they re not). CMC should not list coin that has a sign of market manipulation but it is incorrect to not count the premine.

How much do you want to bet? :pGliss also has the requirement that the trading must be on atleast one exchange with a good trackrecord and a good API. I don't think he will implement his own implementation for the AE just for one asset. So I wouldn't be so sure about getting listed

In the case of country, the coins are locked up for a purpose so they are not outstanding shares. In the case of NEM, no regular share is locked up. For example: any stakeholder can request a token and sell it tomorrow. It is real money and completely actionable. If NEM stake shoot up to 10.000$ tomorrow, I am sure the tokens will be running out pretty fast. It does not stop there. I am open to list else where as long as there are requests so ALL shares are actually tradable and sellable.I did not talk with Gliss yet but you can bet that NEM will be listed in CMC before the official launch as long as he think maidsafe could be there.

This was the main problem that country coins exploited to get on top of the list, even though 50 to 70 percent were not tradable and were "locked" for future release to a country.Only stakes that are available for trade on asset exchanges should be counted to calculate market cap --coinmarketcap will not make the same mistake as they did with country coin, artificially inflating the ranking. I think he already learnt his lesson,

"all country coins would still be listed as someone (developer) owns them" ---> it should. (I should be corrected here - if the dev. are allowed to sell the premine then they are outstanding shares, otherwise they re not). CMC should not list coin that has a sign of market manipulation but it is incorrect to not count the premine.