"As far as I understand, the coalition announced ISIL and other associated groups as the enemy and the coalition does the same as Russia [does]. Somehow some people try to present the coalition action as leading to a political settlement and Russia fighting the same people is being perceived or presented like defending the regime. It's absolutely unfair."

Victor Mikhin, Corresponding Member of the Academy of Natural Sciences, exclusively for the online magazine "New Eastern Outlook."

As soon as Russian air forces began bombing terrorists in Syria, a perfectly timed and thoroughly planned anti-Russian media campaign was launched in the Western media. In those loud and defiant cries to stop bombing "valuable US assets in the region" one can clearly trace the true goals and objectives of Washington and its associates.Biased "experts" are already sensing the imminent Russian defeat, predicting that Syria will become "a new Afghanistan" for Russia,Russian experts at "Voice of America", for instance, are saying that Russian air strikes can serve as a catalyst for global jihad, since extremists can take advantage of Moscow's actions in Syria to recruit new fighters. One can only note that the same jihadists, despite the fact that they are supposedly being bombed by the international coalition led by the United States, for some reason, are not waging jihad against the latter.Western tabloids were let off the leash to hound Russia with false claims that its aircraft have been bombing residential neighborhoods and civilian populations. Out of the blue they've managed to locate "witnesses" capable of telling distinct features of Russian planes with Russian pilots flying at an altitude of five thousand meters. All these false claims have been accompanied by unseen photos of destroyed houses and killed Syrian civilians."Regarding information in the media that the civilians were affected, we are ready for such information attacks and I would like to direct your attention to the fact that first information that there were casualties among civilians were published before our planes took off." - said Russian President Vladimir Putin at a meeting of the Council for Civil Society and Human Rights.For example, the Ministry released the clear footage of airstrikes against militant positions (which, by the way, are nowhere to be found in case of American, French or Saudi raids against terrorists). One of the released videos shows terrorist field camps along with an ISIL command bunker getting obliterated by a Su-34 strike fighter . It is reported that Su-34s, Su-24Ms and Su-25s carried out 18 sorties while destroying 12 targets affiliated with the Islamic State. The better part of the sorties - 10 - were carried out at night. As a result, ISIL's command post and communications center were destroyed in the area of Dar Taazza (province of Aleppo) along with weapon stores and fuel depots in the area of Maarat al-Numan. And all that damage has been done in just 24 hours!In the same time-span the "mighty" international coalition led by the United States has carried out a single drone attack, which, according to CENTCOM, has done an "extensive amount of damage to terrorists" - two excavators were destroyed. Apparently, Syria's Ambassador to Moscow Riyad Haddad was right when he claimed that ever since the establishment of the US coalition against the Islamic State, the area controlled by terrorists in Syria has only been increasing.In turn, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, said that Moscow has information indicating that the US is well aware of where the positions of the Islamic state terrorists are, but it isExplaining Russia's position Sergei Lavrov said The anti-Russian campaign that has been unleashed in the Western media has clearly manifested in the fact that neither the United States nor its allies were planning to fight international terrorism in Syria.In this respect, one can take a look at the publications like the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal, which openly confirm the fact that among others, Russian aircraft attacked "moderate forces" that had been trained by American instructors from the CIA.Those claims reveal that the US has been waging a kind of a hybrid war against Bashar al-Assad and his government, while using semi-legal and completely illegal means of getting rid of him.BBC journalist Jon Sopel went further than others in admitting the level of US involvement in Syria by asking:On this occasion, US Secretary of State John Kerry and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov agreed that US and Russian military officials will coordinate their actions in Syria.It has all come down to the Pentagon discussing the possibility of using military force to protect its terrorists, according to the Associated Press But maybe one should listen to the opinion of Republican Congressman Dana Rohrabacher who stated that Islamist terrorists carried out attacks both against the US and Russia, therefore declaring a war on the modern civilized world. This member of the US House of Representatives is convinced that their barbaric acts and crimes in Syria prove one thing - they must be destroyed.This position can only be confirmed by the following fact.As it was reported across the Arab media, those militants who have families in Syria have started evacuating them urgently to neighboring Iraq.The shameless and vicious media campaign against Russia has highlighted the fact that the West is willing to push the blame of mass extermination of the civilian population in a number of Middle Eastern countries on almost any international player it can - besides itself.Doctors Without Borders has already called for an independent investigation of the tragedy. Earlier, NATO officials have blatantly declared that US air strikes "could cause collateral damage to local medical facilities." What makes this situation rather odd is that over the past month this humanitarian organization provided exact locations of all of its buildings to NATO officials, yet the bombardment lasted for more than an hour even after US officials were told that their forces had been hitting the wrong target.Washington doesn't want to lose the position of "world leader", so it's going to use a wide range strategies to put obstacles in the way of Russia's drive for a settlement in the Middle East to disrupt that position, and which, if successful, will allow refugees to return to their homes.