Abbey, A., Cozzarelli, C., McLaughlin, K., & Harnish, R. J. (1987). The effects of clothing and dyad sex composition on perceptions of sexual intent: Do women and men evaluate these cues differently. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 108–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1987.tb00304.x.

American Psychological Association, Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls. (2007). Report of the APA task force on the Sexualization of girls. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Aquino, K., Sheppard, L., Watkins, M. B., O’Reilly, J., & Smith, A. (2014). Social sexual behavior at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 34, 217–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2014.02.001.

Bernard, P., Gervais, S. J., Allen, J., Campomizzi, S., & Klein, O. (2012). Integrating sexual objectification with object versus person recognition: The sexualized-body-inversion hypothesis. Psychological Science, 23, 469–471. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611434748.

Bishin, B. G., Stevens, D., & Wilson, C. (2006). Character counts? Honesty and fairness in election 2000. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70, 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfj016.

Brewer, P. R., Hoffman, L. H., Harrington, R., Jones, P. E., & Lambe, J. L. (2014). Public perceptions regarding the authenticity of the 2012 presidential candidates. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 44, 42–757. https://doi.org/10.1111/psq.12158.

Calogero, R., Tantleff-Dunn, S., & Thompson, J. K. (2011). Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Cardon, P. W., & Okoro, E. A. (2009). Professional characteristics communicated by formal versus casual workplace attire. Business Communication Quarterly, 72, 355–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569909340682.

Deaux, K., Winton, W., Crowley, M., & Lewis, L. L. (1985). Level of categorization and content of gender stereotypes. Social Cognition, 3, 145–167. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1985.3.2.145.

Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033731.

Dixson, B. J., Grimshaw, G. M., Linklater, W. L., & Dixson, A. F. (2010). Watching the hourglass. Human Nature, 21, 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-010-9100-6.

Dixson, B. J., Grimshaw, G. M., Linklater, W. L., & Dixson, A. F. (2011). Eye tracking of men’s preferences for female breast size and areola pigmentation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9601-8.

Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but…: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.109.

Ehlers, A. S. (2005). A study of recruitment competency indicators for potential hospitality employers. The Consortium Journal, 9, 59–68.

Erchull, M. J., & Liss, M. (2013). Exploring the concept of perceived female sexual empowerment: Development and validation of the sex is power scale. Gender Issues, 30, 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-013-9114-6.

Fredrickson, B. A., & Roberts, T.-A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women's lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x.

Fredrickson, B. L., Roberts, T.-A., Noll, S. M., Quinn, D. M., & Twenge, J. M. (1998). That swimsuit becomes you: Sex differences in self-objectification, restrained eating, and math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 269–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.269.

Gervais, S. J., Vescio, T. K., Förster, J., Maass, A., & Suitner, C. (2012). Seeing women as objects: The sexual body part recognition bias. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 743–753. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1890.

Gervais, S. J., Holland, A. M., & Dodd, M. D. (2013). My eyes are up here: The nature of the objectifying gaze toward women. Sex Roles, 69, 557–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0316-x.

Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491.

Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1037//O003-066X.56.2.1O9.

Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2011). Ambivalent sexism revisited. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 530–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684311414832.

Glick, P., Larsen, S., Johnson, C., & Branstiter, H. (2005). Evaluations of sexy women in low- and high-status jobs. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 389–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00238.x.

Grose, R. G., Grabe, S., & Kohfeldt, D. (2014). Sexual education, gender ideology, and youth sexual empowerment. Journal of Sex Research, 51, 742–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.809511.

Gurney, D. J., Howlett, N., Pine, K., Tracey, M., & Moggridge, R. (2017). Dressing up posture: The interactive effects of posture and clothing on competency judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 108, 436–451. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12209.

Hakim, C. (2010). Erotic capital. European Sociological Review, 26, 499–518. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcq014.

Hakim, C. (2011). Erotic capital. New York: Basic Books.

Hakim, C. (2012). Erotic capital, sexual pleasure and sexual markets. In O. Kontula (Ed.), Pleasure and health by education, councelling and treatment (pp. 27–44). Helsinki, Finland: Nordic Association for Clinical Sexology.

Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analyses. A regression based approach. New York City: The Guilford Press.

Heflick, N. A., Goldenberg, J. L., Cooper, D. P., & Puvia, E. (2011). From women to objects: Appearance focus, target gender, and perceptions of warmth, morality and competence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 572–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.020.

Heilman, M. E., & Stopeck, M. H. (1985). Being attractive: Advantage or disadvantage? Performance-based evaluations and recommended personnel actions as a function of appearance, sex, and job. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 202–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(85)90035-4.

Helminiak, D. A. (1989). Self-esteem, sexual self-acceptance, and spirituality. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 15, 200–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/01614576.1989.11074961.

Hewig, J., Trippe, R. H., Hecht, H., Straube, T., & Miltner, W. H. (2008). Gender differences for specific body regions when looking at men and women. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 32, 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-007-0043-5.

Howlett, N., Pine, K. J., Cahill, N., Orakçıoğlu, İ., & Fletcher, B. C. (2015). Unbuttoned: The interaction between provocativeness of female work attire and occupational status. Sex Roles, 72, 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0450-8.

Johnson, V., & Gurung, R. A. (2011). Defusing the objectification of women by other women: The role of competence. Sex Roles, 65, 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0006-5.

Kang, M., Sklar, M., & Johnson, K. K. (2011). Men at work: Using dress to communicate identities. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 15, 412–427. https://doi.org/10.1108/13612021111169924.

Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2006). The leadership challenge (Vol. 3). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Lamb, S. (2010). Feminist ideals for a healthy female adolescent sexuality: A critique. Sex Roles, 62, 294–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9698-1.

Lindeman, T. (2004, March 2). Tough job climate causes casual look to give way to more formal attire. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Retrieved from http://www.post-gazette.com/business/businessnews/2004/03/02/White-Collar-Suited-for-work-Tough-job-climate-causes-casual-look-to-give-way-to-more-formal-attire/stories/200403020171.

Liss, M., Erchull, M. J., & Ramsey, L. R. (2011). Empowering or oppressing? Development and exploration of the enjoyment of Sexualization scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210386119.

Loughnan, S., Haslam, N., Murnane, T., Vaes, J., Reynolds, C., & Suitner, C. (2010). Objectification leads to depersonalization: The denial of mind and moral concern to objectified others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 709–717. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.755.

McDonnell, G. H. (2008). Sexual empowerment: How erotic capital attracts wealth and power. Christchurch: McDonnell Publishing Company.

McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The objectified body consciousness scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00467.x.

Moradi, B., & Huang, Y. P. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00452.x.

Morrow, P. C. (1990). Physical attractiveness and selection decision-making. Journal of Management, 16, 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639001600104.

Ogle, J. P., & Damhorst, M. L. (1999). Dress for success in the popular press. In K. K. Johnson & S. Lennon (Eds.), Appearance and power (pp. 79–101). Oxford: Berg Publishing.

Overstreet, N. M., Quinn, D. M., & Agocha, V. B. (2010). Beyond thinness: The influence of a curvaceous body ideal on body dissatisfaction in black and white women. Sex Roles, 63, 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9792-4.

Parnes, A. (2001, June 13). Dress-down is down if not quite out. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2001/06/13/jobs/dress-down-is-down-if-not-quite-out.html.

Puvia, E., & Vaes, J. (2012). Being a body: Women’s appearance related self-views and their dehumanization of sexually objectified female targets. Sex Roles, 68, 484–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0255-y.

Rafaeli, A., Dutton, J., Harquail, C. V., & Mackie-Lewis, S. (1997). Navigating by attire: The use of dress by female administrative employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 9–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/257019.

Raza, S. M., & Carpenter, B. N. (1987). A model of hiring decisions in real employment interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 596–603. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.72.4.596.

Rucker, M., Anderson, E., & Kangas, A. (1999). Clothing, power, and the workplace. In K. K. P. Johnson & S. J. Lennon (Eds.), Appearance and power (pp. 59–78). New York: Berg.

Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E., & Nauts, S. (2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.008.

Ruetzler, T., Taylor, J., Reynolds, D., Baker, W., & Killen, C. (2012). What is professional attire today? A conjoint analysis of personal presentation attributes. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31, 937–943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.11.001.

Shertzer, J. E., & Schuh, J. H. (2004). College student perceptions of leadership: Empowering and constraining beliefs. NASPA Journal, 42, 111–131. https://doi.org/10.2202/1949-6605.1417.

Six, B., & Eckes, T. (1991). A closer look at the complex structure of gender stereotypes. Sex Roles, 24, 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288703.

Society for Human Resource Management. (2016). 2016 Employee benefits: A research report by the Society for Human Resource Management. Retrieved from https://www.shrm.org/hr-today/trends-and-forecasting/research-and-surveys/Documents/2016%20SHRM%20Employee%20Benefits%20Full%20Report.pdf.

Solomon, M. R., & Schopler, J. (1982). Self-consciousness and clothing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 508–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167282083018.

Tobii Technology. (2011). Tobii T60 and T120 eye tracker, revision 4. User manual. Sweden (Headquarters): Author.

Umberson, D., & Hughes, M. (1987). The impact of physical attractiveness on achievement and psychological well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 227–236.

Vaillancourt, T. (2013). Do human females use indirect aggression as an intrasexual competition strategy? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 368, 20130080–20130080. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0080.

Vaillancourt, T., & Sharma, A. (2011). Intolerance of sexy peers: Intrasexual competition among women. Aggressive Behavior, 37, 569–577. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20413.

Vanwesenbeeck, I. (2009). The risks and rights of sexualization: An appreciative commentary on Lerum and Dworkin’s “bad girls rule.” Journal of Sex Research, 46, 268–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490903082694.

Watkins, L. M., & Johnston, L. (2000). Screening job applicants: The impact of physical attractiveness and application quality. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00135.

Watkins, M. B., Smith, A. N., & Aquino, K. (2013). The use and consequences of strategic sexual performances. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 27, 173–186. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2010.0109.

What to wear: “Professional” vs. “business casual”. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://careerservices.princeton.edu/node/1279.