majamalu said: I'm keeping most of my BSV (98%) for the same reason I kept most of my BTC (70%):



The State has shown an amazing ability to adapt for thousands of years. I wouldn't be surprised to see the bad guys win once more, and if they win I want a share of the spoils, if only to continue fighting them in the next battle. Click to expand...

This is interesting. I kept roughly 30% of my BSV as I kept roughly 30% of my BTC. From a value-optimization point of view this hasn't been a good strategy at all, but there's also the fact that my "wallet" is the only thing I can use to "vote" and influencing how things develop is something I *want* to do.I'd rather lose wealth making the choice I believe in than profit off the opposing side winning, especially when the battle is fought with money like it at least partly is here and so my betting on the opposing side is actually harmful to my own cause.On the other hand: maybe I'm just overly optimistic and that's why I act so decisively. And I take the point about keeping powder for another battle, which I do, but not to a large enough extent. It's impatience maybe. Usually my strategy in games like Command and Conquer is to identify a weak spot in the enemy, then concentrate on building suitable weaponry (and pretty much ignore everything else except resource flow), time it right and then throw everything I have at the enemy. Usually works fine. But here of course I'm not the only player on the friendly side, so this doesn't work very well depending on how many people join in...Looks like I have some things to learn...