dmorr



During their segment, they Below is a screenshot of Fox & Friends featuring the photo it used of Steinberg, with the original photo on its left. Comparing the two photos, it appears that the following changes have been made: Steinberg's teeth have been yellowed, his nose and chin widened, and his ears made to protrude further.







Similarly, a comparison of the photo of Reddicliffe used by Fox News and the original photo suggests that Reddicliffe's teeth have been yellowed, dark circles have been added under his eyes, and his hairline has been moved back.



Now, my opinion of Fox News is not very high. But even I didn't think they'd stoop to the photoshop equivalent of drawing little mustaches on their perceived enemies. Is it a coincidence, as jgische



Oh, and they didn't even do it well. Check out the modified hairline on Reddicliffe, with the blurry top of his forehead, as if the top of his head just isn't in focus. C'mon, guys, I suck at photoshop and even I could do better than that. The NYTimes published an article about Fox News' declining market share . Fox News' Fox and Friends got irked about it, and complained about the "hit piece" in the NYTimes.During their segment, they altered the photos of the journalist and editor behind the story to make them uglier. Media Matters showed the actual images next to the edited images. Here they are.Now, my opinion of Fox News is not very high. But even I didn't think they'd stoop to the photoshop equivalent of drawing little mustaches on their perceived enemies. Is it a coincidence, aspointed out to me, that they exaggerated the nose and ears of the guy with the Jewish name?Oh, and they didn't even do it well. Check out the modified hairline on Reddicliffe, with the blurry top of his forehead, as if the top of his head just isn't in focus. C'mon, guys, I suck at photoshop and even I could do better than that. Tags: fox, media 3 comments

Speak

Link

Share

Flag Leave a Comment to the Entry