30 frames is unacceptable to pc gamers everywhere. However 30 frames per second, there is a 24hz or framerate for my ps3's blue ray player which looks very natural. Most recorded t.v shows are 30 frames per second. Also my hdtv is 120hz or frames that's i'm using as a monitor. Yes 60 frames does look too smooth and without the 24hz settings all my movies are 60 frames by default. Alot of my games are near 60 frames on pc.



Not sure what i'm trying to say however the info from my post does show alot of ppl does share your concern. However imo for videogames, that's really slow. Maybe it's not the 30 frames you like, rather it's the use of vertical sync in games which is locked at 30 frames for most console games. If you use v sync for pc games, you might get a similar effect of not going too fast. Since you know what 60 frames looks like, I assume you played pc games before.



Still going up to 120hz or 240hz, it also looks great for fast moving images which maybe a bit fast, however more natural. There are even plasmas out there with 600hz or frames out there which looks natural. Look resident evil 5 on the pc looks okay if you lock it to 30 frames, it's very natural, however when I unlock the framerates where it runs at like 70 frames or more, it also looks very natural imo. Maybe 60 is not the best number because 30hz and 120hz, 260hz and 600hz looks more natural to me than 60. I used to think the human eye can only see abouit 85 frames, now having owned a 120hz hdtv, I can say that's totally wrong, it can probally go alot higher in the hundreds, 60 isn't a great number for anything, it's neither slow or fast enough.