"Your sources are just as corrupt as mine, also my sources aren't corrupt"? Doublethink, much?



See, there's a difference in bias, when it comes to the three sites you mentioned and the ones you love.



Fox News, Infowars, Breitbart? They hate you. If you embarass yourself, they'll call you out on it. If you or your celebrities or your politicians get caught doing something shady or blatantly illegal, they're going to call you out on it. And if you choose to use a "Mass Shooting" as a club to bash gun owners and the right to bear arms, they're going to judge you for it.



They hate you, because you're a destructive pack of liars and idiots. So they criticize you. And there's plenty about the modern left they can criticize.



And then, there are the liberal sources you like. CNN, Buzzfeed, Snopes. They've been caught getting paid off by George Soros. They chose to defend con-artists like Anita Sarkesian and pedophiles like John Money solely because the right was criticizing those criminals. They've been caught giving free passes to liberal politicians who say objectionable things while attacking conservative and centrist politicians for saying the same things. They've been caught giving free passes to liberal rapists while attacking conservative and centrist politicians for being accused of rape. Their irrational loathing of me, my friends, my race, my gender, and my politicians has no basis in reality, so they make up stories and publish them, claiming they're from "Anonymous sources". An act only a liberal would fall for.



They hate me, because they're a destructive pack of liars and idiots. So they childishly insult me, like what you're doing right now. And there's nothing about the modern right they can criticize, so they use negative labels like "Idiot" and "Moron" and "Nazi" and "Sexist" and "Divisive" to obfuscate a complete lack of honest content and journalistic integrity.