Barrett, M. E., Swan, A. B., Mamikonian, A., Ghajoyan, I., Kramarova, O., & Youmans, R. J. (2014). Technology in note taking and assessment: the effects of congruence on student performance. International Journal of Instruction, 7, 49–58.

Blasiman, R., Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. A. (2017). The what, how much, and when of study strategies: comparing intended versus actual study behavior. Memory, 25, 784–792. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2016.1221974.

Braver, S. L., Thoemmes, F. J., & Rosenthal, R. (2014). Continuously cumulating meta-analysis and replicability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 333–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614529796.

Bui, D. C., Myerson, J., & Hale, S. (2013). Note-taking with computers: Exploring alternative strategies for improved recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030367.

Carter, J. F., & Van Matre, N. H. (1975). Note taking versus note having. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 900–904. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.67.6.900.

Carter, S. P., Greenberg, K., & Walker, M. S. (2017). The impact of computer usage on academic performance: evidence from a randomized trial at the United States Military Academy. Economics of Education Review, 56, 118–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2016.12.005.

Di Vesta, F. J., & Gray, G. S. (1972). Listening and note taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032243.

Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2017). Spontaneous spatial strategy use in learning from scientific text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 66–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.01.002.

Francis, G. (2012). Publication bias and the failure of replication in experimental psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 975–991. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0322-y.

Glass, A. L., & Kang, M. (2018). Dividing attention in the classroom reduces exam performance. Educational Psychology. 1–14. On-line first publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1489046.

Gurung, R. A. (2005). How do students really study (and does it matter)? Education, 39, 323–340.

James, K. H. (2017). The importance of handwriting experience on the development of the literate brain. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 502–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417709821.

James, K. H., & Engelhardt, L. (2012). The effects of handwriting experience on functional brain development in pre-literate children. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 1, 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2012.08.001.

James, K. H., & Gauthier, I. (2006). Letter processing automatically recruits a sensory-motor brain network. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2937–2949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.06.026.

Johnson, C. I., & Mayer, R. E. (2009). A testing effect with multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 621–629. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015183.

Karpicke, J. D., Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L. (2009). Metacognitive strategies in student learning: do students practice retrieval when they study on their own? Memory, 17, 471–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210802647009.

Kiewra, K. A. (1985). Students’ note-taking behaviors and the efficacy of providing the instructor’s notes for review. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 10, 378–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(85)90034-7.

Kiewra, K. A. (1989). A review of note-taking: the encoding-storage paradigm and beyond. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 147–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01326640.

Kobayashi, K. (2005). What limits the encoding effect of note-taking? A meta-analytic examination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 242–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.10.001.

Kobayashi, K. (2006). Combined effects of note-taking/reviewing on learning and the enhancement through interventions: a meta-analytic review. Educational Psychology, 26, 459–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500342070.

Kornell, N., Bjork, R. A., & Garcia, M. A. (2011). Why tests appear to prevent forgetting: a distribution-based bifurcation model. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.04.002.

Luo, L., Kiewra, K. A., Flanigan, A. E., & Peteranetz, M. S. (2018). Laptop versus longhand note taking: effects on lecture notes and achievement. Instructional Science, 46, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-018-9458-0.

Morehead, K., Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Blasiman, R., & Hollis, R. B. (2019). Note-taking habits of 21st century college students: implications for student learning, memory, and achievement. Memory. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2019.156969.

Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The pen is mightier than the keyboard: advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological Science, 25, 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614524581.

Nandagopal, K., & Ericsson, K. A. (2012). An expert performance approach to the study of individual differences in self-regulated learning activities in upper-level college students. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 597–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.11.018.

Palmatier, R. A., & Bennett, J. M. (1974). Notetaking habits of college students. Journal of Reading, 18, 215–218. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40009958. Accessed 12 April 2016.

Patterson, R. W., & Patterson, R. M. (2017). Computers and productivity: evidence from laptop use in the college classroom. Economics of Education Review, 57, 66–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2017.02.004.

Peverly, S. T., & Sumowski, J. F. (2012). What variables predict quality of text notes and are text notes related to performance on different types of tests? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 104–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1802.

Peverly, S. T., & Wolf, A. D. (2019). Note-taking. To appear in J. Dunlosky & K. A. Rawson (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of cognition and education (pp. 320–355). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Peverly, S. T., Sumowski, J. F., & Garner, J. (2007). Skill in lecture note-taking: what predicts? Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.167.

Peverly, S. T., Vekaria, P. C., Reddington, L. A., Sumowski, J. F., Johnson, K. R., & Ramsay, C. M. (2013). The relationship of handwriting speed, working memory, language comprehension and outlines to lecture note-taking and test-taking among college students. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2881.

Peverly, S. T., Garner, J. K., & Vekaria, P. C. (2014). Both handwriting speed and selective attention are important to lecture note-taking. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 27, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9431-x.

Ragan, E. D., Jennings, S. R., Massey, J. D., & Doolittle, P. E. (2014). Unregulated use of laptops over time in large lecture classes. Computers & Education, 78, 78–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.002.

Reddington, L. A., Peverly, S. T., & Block, C. J. (2015). An examination of some of the cognitive and motivation variables related to gender differences in lecture note-taking. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 28, 1155–1185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9566-z.

Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17, 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x.

Sana, F., Weston, T., & Cepeda, N. J. (2013). Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers. Computers & Education, 62, 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.003.

Sibley, C. G. (2008). Utilities for examining simple meta-analytic avergages [computer software]. Auckland: University of Auckland.

Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632.

Simons, D. J. (2014). The value of direct replications. Perspectives on Psychological Sciences, 9, 76–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613514755.

Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): a proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630.

Toppino, T. C., & Cohen, M. S. (2009). The testing effect and the retention interval. Experimental Psychology, 56, 252–257. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.56.4.252.