When The Intercept asked the NYPD for comment on the program and providing IBM with police camera footage, the department responded as follows: "Video, from time to time, was provided to IBM to ensure that the product they were developing would work in the crowded urban NYC environment and help us protect the City. There is nothing in the NYPD's agreement with IBM that prohibits sharing data with IBM for system development purposes. Further, all vendors who enter into contractual agreements with the NYPD have the absolute requirement to keep all data furnished by the NYPD confidential during the term of the agreement, after the completion of the agreement, and in the event that the agreement is terminated."

The counterterrorism unit of the NYPD had access to a prerelease version of the program in 2012 and were able to test its features. However, by 2016, the NYPD decided not to install it widely. IBM's analytics software was phased out after that and is no longer in use.

The question here is why wasn't the development of this software, and the agreement between the NYPD and IBM, made public? After all, IBM was given access to police body camera imagery and video. Privacy experts argue that New Yorkers have a right to know where, when and how their images are being used, especially when it comes to handing them over to a private company to create surveillance technology.