Vayra86 Dude, come on. 99% of that is inflated marketing BS and the remaining 1% is never really visible unless you're analyzing the pixels themselves. It also doesn't defeat physics in any way, if you have huge FPS dips, you will have problems no matter what and Gsync or FreeSync makes no difference then. I can bet you right now that in double blind testing no one could see a difference. Even high refresh uncapped versus Gsync is already hard for most. Maybe its not technically the same, but the experience sure is.

It depends on the model my friend. You can clearly see the response time going nuts when there are a lot of framerate dips on some models. While with a Gsync module the overdrive stays consistent amongst the entire range.And this doesn´t mean I don´t agree with you; For example, Nvidia considers Asus XG248Q as a Gsync compatible on their official list. If you try Gsync on that monitor and compare with let´s say a Samsung FG73 the difference is clear. A Gsync module monitor still offers a superior VRR experience that can´t be ignored.You can also notice how many times a no Gsync Module monitor hits the ceilling, unless you cap to 120fps. While on a Gsync module monitor you can get away with a 141fps cap and be assured it will never hit the ceilling. Hitting the ceilling will cause either:- tearing- input lagIt is more precise when you have a module, while with the driver the monitor adjustements are all over the place, again, depending on the model. You can notice it more on some compared to others.You can visit Blur Busters if you are interested in reading the differences. With that being said, Gsync is still too expensive and that´s the problem. Getting just a good FreeSync monitor that works well with driver enabled gsync is a much smarter option. But simply saying this driver Gsync is the same as the module one, is not right, trust me.