Andrew Anglin

Daily Stormer

May 31, 2017

We often do “what if the races were reversed” thought experiments.

These are very basic red pills to get the wheels in people’s brains turning.

For instance:

What if two white people were convicted of torturing and killing black babies in the same week?

Questions to then ask:

Would there be national media coverage?

Would the races of the perpetrators and victims be reported?

Would politicians be expected to comment on it?

Would activists be organizing in response?

Would there be hundreds of op-eds written about the oppression blacks suffer, and how whites feel their lives have no value?

The answer to all of those questions is obviously “yes,” and yet, many normies never ask themselves these questions, because they do not see anyone else asking these questions.

It is helpful to point these things out.

Let’s Apply This to Something Else

For about 2 years now, nonwhites from Africa and the Middle East have been marching into Europe. We don’t know the numbers because the governments all lie, but they are in the millions.

Nine out of ten of these nonwhite “migrants” coming in are young, aggressive males.

Meanwhile, nine out of ten of the whites who go out to demonstrate in support of this invasion are female.

I have been criticized – even insulted and called names – for suggesting that there is a sexual element to these sex demographics.

I have argued that these women clearly have a sexual fixation with these men, and I have been accused of hating women.

Well: What if the Sexes were Reversed?

For instance:

What if 90% of the “migrants” marching into Europe were submissive young women from Asia, and 90% of the white demonstrators supporting this invasion were men, who marched through the streets holding handmade signs with hearts painted on them reading “refugees welcome”?

Questions to then ask:

Would white women feel comfortable with this situation?

Would the media comment on the sexual demographics of demonstrators in support of the invasion?

Would women who pointed out the sex demographics of the “migrants” in contrast to the white supporters of the influx be accused of “hating men”?

Would feminists be writing more op-eds than usual about how “white men have fetishized Asian female submissiveness”?

Would nationalists attack another nationalist for claiming there was a sexual dynamic to the overwhelming male support for an overwhelmingly female “migrant crisis”?

It’s just a thought experiment.

To get the wheels turning.

Because I think we may have a situation here where both:

A) White men are biologically evolved to view women as sexually innocent, and

B) White men are afraid to admit that their women are lusting after foreign men; it feels like something they should be shamed by, and so they choose to embrace delusion

But it is extremely important that we understand what is going on with this situation.

Refusing to admit that our women are colluding with Jews to cuck us on a civilizational scale does not help us understand the situation, nor does being an adult and accepting obvious, in-your-face facts of life mean you “hate women.”

For the Record

Our women do not necessarily prefer men of other races, women are simply oblivious of race when choosing a mate. What they are doing is bringing in aggressive men to compete with us for them.

Women want men to fight with one another, so that they can mate with the one who is stronger. This is an in-born drive they have.

The fact that they will try to pretend they don’t like it is also an evolutionary function – because if they made it obvious they did like it, men would say to one another “what is this woman’s game?”

Any man who has spent any significant portion of time around women is aware of the phenomenon where they will provoke a fight between two men and then begin to hysterically ask them to stop it. This is also another level of the challenge, as if the man acquiesces to her demand to stop, he is as unworthy as if he loses the fight outright.

Also note that this is all subconscious for the overwhelming majority of these women. They are carrying out an evolutionarily programmed mating function, by forcing one group of men to establish dominance and thus win the right to their wombs.

Women are sexually fixated on male dominance. Moslems are viewed as dominant, while men of the West are viewed as weak – primarily, for the very reason that they have allowed women “freedom.”

However, their support for the invasion can also be viewed as a challenge to white men. The same situation as when a girl you are pursuing allows another guy to start flirting with her in front of you to see how you will react; of course, the reaction she wants is for you to come say “hey buddy – get outta here, she’s mine” – but if you don’t do that, maybe she’ll just go with him instead.

Women, particularly single women, will always choose to maximize the number of men competing for them if possible. There is no morality to this. It is simply a function of their psychology.

Men, on the other hand, will use logic to create a situation that is as livable and productive as possible.

This is why never in history did anyone ever imagine the concept of allowing women to engage in politics.

NOTE: This writer responded extensively to comments on this article, some of which may be interesting to you, as the concepts are expanded on. Check it.