Summary: According to researchers, people tend to change the pitch of their voice depending on who they are talking to and how dominant they feel. The study found that a person’s vocal characteristics altered in response to people of different social status. When a person was believed to be more dominant, people’s voices became more high pitched.

Source: University of Stirling.

People tend to change the pitch of their voice depending on who they are talking to, and how dominant they feel, a study by the University of Stirling has found.

The psychology research, published in PLOS ONE, put participants through a simulated job interview task and discovered that individuals’ vocal characteristics – particularly pitch – are altered in response to people of different social status.

Regardless of self-perceived social status, people tend to talk to high status individuals using a higher pitch.

Dr Viktoria Mileva, a Postdoctoral Researcher at the University of Stirling, said: “A deep, masculine voice sounds dominant, especially in men, while the opposite is true of a higher pitched voice. So, if someone perceives their interviewer to be more dominant than them, they raise their pitch. This may be a signal of submissiveness, to show the listener that you are not a threat, and to avoid possible confrontations.

“These changes in our speech may be conscious or unconscious but voice characteristics appear to be an important way to communicate social status. We found both men and women alter their pitch in response to people they think are dominant and prestigious.”

The researchers also found that participants who think they are dominant – who use methods like manipulation, coercion, and intimidation to acquire social status – are less likely to vary their pitch and will speak in a lower tone when talking to someone of a high social status.

Individuals who rate themselves as high in prestige – they believe people look up to them and value their opinions, thereby granting them social status – do not change how loud they are speaking, no matter who they are speaking to. This may signal that they are more calm and in control of a situation.

The participants responded to introductory, personal, and interpersonal interview questions. They lowered the pitch of their voice most in response to the more complex, interpersonal questions, for example when explaining a conflict situation to an employer.

Dr Mileva added: “Signals and perceptions of human social status have an effect on virtually every human interaction, ranging from morphological characteristics – such as face shape – to body posture, specific language use, facial expressions and voices.

“Understanding what these signals are, and what their effects are, will help us comprehend an essential part of human behaviour.”

Experts believe the vocal changes identified in this study could be true for other situations where there are perceived social status differences between two people talking. This includes talking with a rival on the football pitch or interacting with a colleague.

About this neuroscience research article

Source: University of Stirling

Image Source: NeuroscienceNews.com image is in the public domain.

Original Research: Full open access research for “Perceived differences in social status between speaker and listener affect the speaker’s vocal characteristics” by Juan David Leongómez, Viktoria R. Mileva, Anthony C. Little, and S. Craig Roberts in PLOS ONE. Published online June 14 2017 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0179407

Cite This NeuroscienceNews.com Article

[cbtabs][cbtab title=”MLA”]University of Stirling “Social Status of Listener Alters Our Voice.” NeuroscienceNews. NeuroscienceNews, 29 June 2017.

<https://neurosciencenews.com/voice-social-status-7008/>.[/cbtab][cbtab title=”APA”]University of Stirling (2017, June 29). Social Status of Listener Alters Our Voice. NeuroscienceNew. Retrieved June 29, 2017 from https://neurosciencenews.com/voice-social-status-7008/[/cbtab][cbtab title=”Chicago”]University of Stirling “Social Status of Listener Alters Our Voice.” https://neurosciencenews.com/voice-social-status-7008/ (accessed June 29, 2017).[/cbtab][/cbtabs]

Abstract

Perceived differences in social status between speaker and listener affect the speaker’s vocal characteristics

Non-verbal behaviours, including voice characteristics during speech, are an important way to communicate social status. Research suggests that individuals can obtain high social status through dominance (using force and intimidation) or through prestige (by being knowledgeable and skilful). However, little is known regarding differences in the vocal behaviour of men and women in response to dominant and prestigious individuals. Here, we tested within-subject differences in vocal parameters of interviewees during simulated job interviews with dominant, prestigious, and neutral employers (targets), while responding to questions which were classified as introductory, personal, and interpersonal. We found that vocal modulations were apparent between responses to the neutral and high-status targets, with participants, especially those who perceived themselves as low in dominance, increasing fundamental frequency (F0) in response to the dominant and prestigious targets relative to the neutral target. Self-perceived prestige, however, was less related to contextual vocal modulations than self-perceived dominance. Finally, we found that differences in the context of the interview questions participants were asked to respond to (introductory, personal, interpersonal), also affected their vocal parameters, being more prominent in responses to personal and interpersonal questions. Overall, our results suggest that people adjust their vocal parameters according to the perceived social status of the listener as well as their own self-perceived social status.

“Perceived differences in social status between speaker and listener affect the speaker’s vocal characteristics” by Juan David Leongómez, Viktoria R. Mileva, Anthony C. Little, and S. Craig Roberts in PLOS ONE. Published online June 14 2017 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0179407

Feel free to share this Neuroscience News.