George Conway, the husband of White House counselor Kellyanne Conway Kellyanne Elizabeth ConwaySpecial counsel investigating DeVos for potential Hatch Act violation: report George and Kellyanne Conway honor Ginsburg Trump carries on with rally, unaware of Ginsburg's death MORE, on Monday replied to a tweet from President Trump Donald John TrumpOmar fires back at Trump over rally remarks: 'This is my country' Pelosi: Trump hurrying to fill SCOTUS seat so he can repeal ObamaCare Trump mocks Biden appearance, mask use ahead of first debate MORE, telling the president he thinks the case that Trump violated campaign finance law "looks like a pretty good case."

Replying to a tweet quoting Fox News from the president that said there was no "smocking [sic] gun tying the Trump campaign to Russia," Conway said that campaign finance violations were found by "professional line prosectors" and added that it was done by a "Republican-controlled" Justice Department.

ADVERTISEMENT

"No, the criminal campaign-finance violations were found by professional line prosecutors in a Republican-controlled United States Department of Justice," Conway, a frequent critic of the president, wrote on Twitter. "It looks like a pretty good case. Kudos to them."

No, the criminal campaign-finance violations were found by professional line prosecutors in a Republican-controlled United States Department of Justice. It looks like a pretty good case. Kudos to them. https://t.co/PrtXErjcVI — George Conway (@gtconway3d) December 10, 2018

Federal prosecutors in New York on Friday said that they had found Trump directed his former lawyer, Michael Cohen, to violate campaign finance law by using campaign funds to pay off two women who claimed to have had affairs with Trump.

Cohen had previously said Trump told him to pay the women off, breaking campaign finance law, but his lawyer Lanny Davis, who is an opinion contributor to The Hill, had said there might be no evidence of Trump's involvement beyond Cohen's testimony.

Conway was responding to a tweet that Trump wrote earlier Monday, in which he wrote that Democrats had been unable to find clear evidence that his 2016 presidential campaign colluded with Russia, arguing that this demonstrated his innocence.

The president went on to say that the money spent to pay off the women was a "private transaction" and not a "campaign contribution."

"'Democrats can’t find a Smocking Gun tying the Trump campaign to Russia after James Comey James Brien ComeyDemocrats fear Russia interference could spoil bid to retake Senate Book: FBI sex crimes investigator helped trigger October 2016 public probe of Clinton emails Trump jabs at FBI director over testimony on Russia, antifa MORE’s testimony. No Smocking Gun...No Collusion.' @Fox News," Trump wrote.

"That’s because there was NO COLLUSION," he said. "So now the Dems go to a simple private transaction, wrongly call it a campaign contribution."

“Democrats can’t find a Smocking Gun tying the Trump campaign to Russia after James Comey’s testimony. No Smocking Gun...No Collusion.” @FoxNews That’s because there was NO COLLUSION. So now the Dems go to a simple private transaction, wrongly call it a campaign contribution,... — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 10, 2018

....which it was not (but even if it was, it is only a CIVIL CASE, like Obama’s - but it was done correctly by a lawyer and there would not even be a fine. Lawyer’s liability if he made a mistake, not me). Cohen just trying to get his sentence reduced. WITCH HUNT! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 10, 2018

In his initial response to Trump, Conway seemed to mock the president's apparent misspelling of "smoking gun."

Conway later deleted the original tweet.

Special counsel Robert Mueller Robert (Bob) MuellerCNN's Toobin warns McCabe is in 'perilous condition' with emboldened Trump CNN anchor rips Trump over Stone while evoking Clinton-Lynch tarmac meeting The Hill's 12:30 Report: New Hampshire fallout MORE, who is investigating possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, as well as Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, has indicted numerous people and several companies, but none yet with direct connections to collusion between the campaign and Russia.

He is reportedly expected to make his final report soon, which Democrats anticipate could be a key step toward possibly impeaching the president.