draugredgelord:

inferentialdistance:

draugredgelord: inferentialdistance: shieldfoss: shieldfoss: leviathan-supersystem: shieldfoss: brazenautomaton: tariqah: A lot of men are specifically attracted to “Broken” girls like mentally ill and traumatised girls and half of it is to manipulate them the other half is the aesthetics and there’s one part of them thinking all their disgusting fetishes will be fulfilled by them it’s bad Progressives worship cruelty, news at 11. No I’m with OP, broken people should be shunned by society and sent away to die in solitude. Broken people should never be allowed to taste the milk of human kindness, nor have anything that even pretends at normality. This is a normal opinion for good people. hey maybe you could use your brainstem and discern a distinction between saying “broken people should never be loved,” which is an absurd statement nobody is making, and saying “there are people who specifically seek out broken people who are manipulators who are looking for easy marks,” which is a demonstrably true statement

How did I not already have you blocked, I thought I had you blocked But to everybody else now that LS definitely is blocked: That’s not actually a real distinction, what’s gonna happen is that nice and decent people are going to fall in love with broken people, and it’s going to be seen as a sign of weakness that they’re willing to “settle” for somebody broken. Assholes are going to come out of the fucking woodwork to enforce social norms by harrassing both people involved in the name of social conformity, except they’re going to phrase it to be in the name of being woke to the danger of predators going after broken people. As a broken person who would like to be loved, I don’t need such allies, and would like them to fuck off. there are people who specifically seek outbroken people who are manipulators who are looking for easy marks

Because that’s not what was said, you equivocating asshole. What was said was: A lot of men are specifically attracted to “Broken” girls like mentally ill and traumatised girls and half of it is to manipulate them

And in case you missed it, “there are people” and “a lot of men” are not equivalent, since the latter indicates a much bigger proportion of the relevant population. Then it goes on to conflate attraction with desire to abuse. The end result is that it asserts that men who like women who are “broken” are categorically abusers, and that this is a significant percentage of all men. Wild how it’s only you sociopathic MRA/incel types who are interpreting the OP’s post as conflating attraction in and of itself with a desire to abuse. If everyone else (including myself, and I’m a man) gets it through common sense reading comprehension, but you guys have to hyperrationalize it and run it through these kinds of contorted pseudolinguistic analyses to justify whatever self-serving interpretation, that says a lot. You’re all desperately trying to defend yourselves by manipulating the context in an attempt to dismiss the OP, derail a conversation about abuse, and project your own tendencies onto others because deep down you identify with the kind of dickless worm described in the OP’s post You know that accusations of abuse are a common tool of actual abusers, right? That the only reason to use such broad, vague, and ambiguous language when having a “conversation about abuse” is to weaponize anti-abuse sentiment against innocent people who don’t have the social standing to defend against it. It’s telling that you bring up “MRA/incel types”, since they’re exactly the sort of demographic group of low social standing that you can get away with casually insulting… And, you know, MRAs are people who think men need help, thus failing to meet male gender expectation of stoicism, and incels fail to meet the male gender expectation of sexual prowess, so good job reinforcing the patriarchy there. If you actually cared about abuse, you’d be talking about the actual signs of abuse, and what to do when you spot them. Such as, for example, a pattern of consistently placing the abuser’s own wants and needs above the wants and needs of the abused, and enforcing your boundaries, respectively. But instead you’d rather aid the structures of oppression you claim to oppose, because it lets you mock the hated outgroup.

Who are you honestly trying convince here? Yourself? Some echo chamber among your followers? Because it sure as hell ain’t me

I know you want me to gratify all of that with some extensive argument against each “point” you made and make you feel validated, but you’re not going to get that here because there’s nothing valid about your argument. It’s just the same gaslighting, projection, and deflection as before; twisted meanings and bullshit excuses, all because you ain’t got the dick to admit that the OP struck a nerve by criticizing these manipulative, opportunistic fucks who prey on psychologically vulnerable women

The only time straight men come out the woodwork to talk about abusive women or unfair male gender roles is when incel MRA fucks desperately need to derail conversations about abusive men and female gender roles. It’s just a pathetic gotcha and it’s not going to work here, at all