WARNING WALL OF TEXT AND NUMBERS AHEAD, KIRA BEWARE

Today I wanted to analyze some [redacted]* from the last two days:

*Note this number is [redacted] count

Day 1: [redacted]: 1 (we can determine how many [redacted] did [redacted] in each zone)

A - 8109

B - 5104

C - 7042

Day 2: [redacted]: 15 (This is where it gets tricky, see if you can catch up)

A - 39028

B - 46497

C - 99590

Since we know how many [redacted] were sent, lets try to guess how many people [redacted] in each zone.

A

39028 / 15 = ~2602 - But this number accounts for the people who knew that you can put in 15. Let's include the casuals

39028 / 2 = ~19514 - Now you may wonder why I put 2 instead of 1, lets also include those cases where people dump the materials first then scouted so they could only deploy 1~2 drones

(2602 + 19514) /2 = ~6963 - We sum up both and average them and we get roughly 6.9K people. My Assumption

B

46497 / 15 = ~3100 - We do the same for B as A so first assume all voted normally.

46497 / 7 = ~6642 - For this case, we assume most people who just blinded voted for A are out of the picture leaving just those who only sent 1~2 drones.

We assume that the amount of people is roughly ~6.6K people +/- 300

C

99590 / 15 = ~6640 -> ~6650

Same as before, I assume people who voted for C knew they could send 15 drones and added around 10 for "random misclicks"

Now we get to the part of so please bear with me, I has autism.

A: From Day 1 -> 2, we see the change of 8109 -> 6963, with a net loss of 1146 people Once again my number, doesn't reflect real numbers in game

people Once again my number, doesn't reflect real numbers in game B: From Day 1 -> 2, we see the change of 5104 -> 6642, with a net gain of 1538 people Once again my number, doesn't reflect real numbers in game

people Once again my number, doesn't reflect real numbers in game C: From Day 1 ->2, we see the change of 7042 -> 6650, with a net loss of 394 people Once again my number, doesn't reflect real numbers in game

Assuming we had the same amount of people who participated Day 1 as in Day 2, those are my assumptions on where people went.

Once we put the data together:

A won for Day 2, the voters will tend to go to B. (Logically)

B tied for Day 2, voters have the option to stay B or choose the winner A (Logically)

C lost for Day 2, so voters tend will to go to A.

However this doesn't cover the 3rd party voter who may potentially affect the EN logic. Since Ceia's video says "Vote for C" and the meme CChair took off, it was hard to debate why C won Day 2 and where that adds up in the equation for Day 3.