On Friday, seasoned political commentator Brit Hume took issue with Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman’s testimony regarding the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump.

According to Vindman, Trump’s call to Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky on July 25 left him “deeply troubled” that the president was attempting to “subvert U.S. foreign policy,” The Washington Post reported:

He told lawmakers that he was deeply troubled by what he interpreted as an attempt by the president to subvert U.S. foreign policy and an improper attempt to coerce a foreign government into investigating a U.S. citizen.

Hume, reacting to the Post’s write-up on Twitter, highlighted that Vindman’s supposed fear is “illogical,” since it is the president who sets the U.S. foreign policy agenda.

“This from the article: ‘he was deeply troubled by what he interpreted as an attempt by the president to subvert U.S. foreign policy…’ There is a huge fallacy in this. Anyone know what it is?” Hume wrote.

Hume clarified the “huge fallacy” in a reply, explaining, “it’s the fact that the president is the constitutional author of foreign policy, so the idea he is ‘subverting’ it is illogical.”

This from the article: “he was deeply troubled by what he interpreted as an attempt by the president to subvert U.S. foreign policy…” There is a huge fallacy in this. Anyone know what it is? https://t.co/L1Jfgck6G2 — Brit Hume (@brithume) November 2, 2019

Actually, it’s the fact that the president is the constitutional author of foreign policy, so the idea he is “subverting” it is illogical. — Brit Hume (@brithume) November 2, 2019

As highlighted by The Blaze, “the executive branch has the most significant role in crafting U.S. foreign policy, and because the president is the head of the executive branch, the president essentially determines the direction of U.S. foreign policy while in office.”

Vindman also testified that the call’s official record and rough transcript “included an inexplicable change,” the Post noted. Instead of including the word “Burisma,” Ukraine’s largest private gas company and the company that employed former Vice President Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden, the transcript included the phrase, “the company that you mentioned in this issue.”

The Post suggests that “Burisma” was intentionally left out of the transcript, but notes that “[s]ome argue that the transcribers simply misunderstood or missed the word but used a generic description” — that is, if the company name was actually said during the call.