The feminist virus has negatively affected humanity more than has the Coronavirus, with many more deaths and suffering occurring as a result, yet why has it not been equally feared and opposed?

Because it is transmitted through women with no antibodies due to chivalry and a cultured female superiority rating (e.g. ‘placed on a pedestal’). Its means of spread is likened to the perception of a child who is captivated by the colours of a Black Widow Spider without being savvy to its deadly effects, openly welcoming the spread of the dreadful disease.

Let’s begin from what is an equal point in the creation of human life–conception and the forming of a human embryo. Both sexes at a certain point start out as equals, so what changes that status? At what point is this tiny being determined to be less valuable and worthy as a human being? What makes this one different is it is destined to become a human male. Little does he know that how he is naturally created will determine his fate per an outside environment deeming him status at present less significant than a household pet. Pets, in many cases, have more rights, consideration, and empathy applied to them than do men. (What is commonly conveyed, even considered ‘humorous’, toward men is unacceptable toward pets.)

Males are groomed from boyhood by their mothers and other men, also groomed from their boyhood by their mothers, to serve women as a part of their defined ‘manhood’. This male-designated discount comes to light immediately after a boy is born. That he is not adequate (even ‘dirty’) due to the way God and Mother Nature (ironically) created him is soon demonstrated shortly after he emerges from his mother’s womb when his intimacy is immediately severed to accommodate a female and religious preference through circumcision. (This alone could have altering/desensitizing effects on his development.)



As he develops into boyhood he soon realizes that he is treated differently from his sisters in other ways too. He experiences a conditional ‘love’ in which case he is designated for use such as a utility who must ‘earn’ affections to be ‘deserving’ of any. He finds in contrast that the love provided to his sisters is unconditional. They receive a true and genuine love for who they are as persons and individuals. They are in fact pampered and given attention at a whim.

[Note: Men are told they do not know what love is. Could this be why? Or, being deprived of something may mean just the opposite in that man who yearns for something may have a more sincere and genuine appreciation and expression of love than those who are spoiled and take what they have been given for granted–in fact use ‘love’ to get what they want through privilege and entitlement as ‘little princesses’.]

This assigned identity is something a male is groomed to take ‘pride’ in as he is sculpted to become what others have deemed for him to become ‘a man’. He is otherwise branded a boy and irresponsible, in fact, made out to be a criminal–otherwise ‘appropriately’ packaged as inadequate, not qualified to be ‘a man’ and therefore undeserving of life’s simple pleasures or even his basic needs. His assigned position of accountability requires that he takes blame for everything and even places him conveniently as a scapegoat and mere figurehead to take the blame. The utility and disposable assignment of his owned existence are evident throughout his life, with his next level of servitude and accommodating disability attributed at the young age of eighteen when he is required to register for military service or be subject to humiliation, threat, and potential criminal punishment unless he complies.

During this same time period, he is to also prove himself worthy to his ‘superior’ female counterpart, who has been spoiled and pampered (placed above him) in the mating process. Once he ‘proves’ himself to her as a worthy utility, he must continue to do so throughout the mating process and thereafter striving to please and prove himself as her worthy servant. Hence, “Happy wife, happy life.” As he has been cast as a reliable slave, he retains this status even after separation (through a divorce settlement, paying alimony and child support) and even after his death (left her well-off). This process, unless he complies with the female’s wishes, also subjects him to criminal liability. Little recognition is provided to him as an individual or someone with any personal value.

At the discretion of a woman (who has an automatic superior status granted by law and the courts) a man is also forced to have a child and pay CS, sometimes even if he is not the biological father–a certified slave per (proving himself worthy as one prior) per court order, as a father has no reproductive rights compared to the mother. He is once again potentially criminalized if he fails to provide finances due to his child, purposely deprived a father, being used as a human token to do so.

He will also be criminalized through his sexuality at the female’s discretion for enacting his natural part in the sexual mating process per law and by many other males who blindly serve women socially and within in a prejudiced and discriminatory government system. Even if he chooses to be a father he is exempt from being considered a part of the family, not only through the family courts but through government subsidy funding and support programs designating a family consisting of only women and children (e.g. WIC–Women, Infants, and Children)–ironically out from which the male children will soon be cast when they no longer can be used as tokens to extort financial resources from their fathers. (Also through these government programs fathers are not allowed in the household, otherwise, single women with children will be disqualified from receiving government funding/subsidized housing.)

[Note: Men and fathers and their infants and children are not even recognized through these discriminatory and unconstitutional references, programs, and associated practices. How can something (the Constitution, freedom, and the family itself) upon which a country is built, be so easily discarded? Is this not a form of treason? Of course it is. What do soldiers fight for and military might even mean if this unopposed attack on our freedom and a violation of our basic civil rights is allowed from within?]

We need not look too closely to perceive the pain and extreme violations of men, but most are not adequately receptive to the injustices being openly applied to men. This can be achieved through human compassion and merely caring about the truth which is needed to make an impact. Few competent news media sources exist to ensure this but instead continue to promote misandry, robbing men of equal empathy to women.

In conclusion, this boy now a man, upon being robbed of his personal and financial assets which he’s worked hard to secure, now looks back on his life. He sees what others can not, or do not care enough to see, and realizes that his existence, for which he has been sculpted from birth with a defined identity for which to ‘pride’ himself, has been a sham. He has been deprived of an existence defined in his own right. In his memory he is, more often than not, referred to as someone who wasn’t there for his children and/or wife when he had been court-ordered to be separated from them, and/or he has had worked a dangerous job with long hours, as a worthy slave does, or died in such performance. He is blamed even after his death for failing to be an adequate utility–“He left a wife and three kids”–with little personal attachment or the individual value attributed to his existence, let alone deemed a status ‘deserving’ of an existence defined in his own right.



Alan Millard’s most recent book, A Flaw From Within: How Women’s Higher Status Defies Equal Justice, Violates Men, and Destroys Society, is available through Amazon.

You can read more from us at…..