edit on 5-1-2018 by OtherSideOfTheCoin because: (no reason given)



Well this is him speaking in his own words.He is pretty adiment that his account is a true as it can be.Also the author is not saying he made it up he is saying that he believes at times those he was interviewing didn’t tell him the truth and it’s for the reader to decide what to believe of their claims.To me reading the article and the OP it’s sounds like a attempt to twist things to try to discredit this book. Actually this entire OP is very misleading, even reading through the arrival it does not say that Wolff has admitted that it’s mostly untrue. So I’d say if anything belongs in the Hoax bin it’s probably thisMore of the right grasping at straws to run to the Defense of trum and actually I am almost starting to pity them.To be clear: it is factually incorrect to claim that Wolff has said that the contents of this book are “mostly untrue”.Sure individuals might want to believe the the contents of the book are untrue but it is factually incorrect to claim that Wolff has said that this book is “mostly untrue”as the OP has said....it is “fake news”