On Thursday 11.04.19, a survey was posted to the Pete Buttigieg subreddit, receiving 625 results (which is a nice even 5^4).

That little purple sliver at the top are those from Alaska, Hawaii and other overseas regions.

Age

Next were four questions with multiple choice. The first two were asked three times, for a 1st, 2nd, and 3rd choice; the second two twice. The multiple repeats were aggregated and weighted: a vote in the 1st question getting 3 points, in the 2nd two, and in the 3rd one point.

“Non-policy wise, which of these is the most appealing about Mayor Pete?”

(options: calm demeanour; language skills; education at Harvard and Oxford; youth; mayoral experience; LGBT representation; Chasten; McKinsey experience)



“Policy wise, which of these most attracts you to Mayor Pete?”

(Options: Medicare for all who want it; environmental policies; SCOTUS reform; ending the electoral college; automation policies; statehood for Washington DC and Puerto Rico; addressing racial injustice; federal non-discrimination act; background checks for gun sales; legalisation of marijuana; ending the death penalty; withdrawing troops home from Afghanistan)

Which (if any) of these most concerns you about Mayor Pete?

Only 59% of people gave any concerns, and only 32% of responders gave two. Eliminating all the “none” answers produced the following graph

(Options: not supporting free college; not supporting immediate implementation of Medicare for all; lack of experience; McKinsey experience; military experience; policies as mayor; too centrist; too far left)

“Which of the following would you most want for president excluding Pete?”

“Would any of the following, if selected as Democratic nominee, not get your support? (i.e. you would not vote at all / vote 3rd party / vote Trump)”

Note: Tulsi Gabbard was not the list of options, but received around thirty write-ins, so I suspect she would be much higher if I had included her as a click-option