unobject:

the argument is two-fold:

1. the two are completely unrelated- trans men are men and are structurally and interpersonaly in a position of power in relation to women generally, regardless of ”cissexism” and

2. that nearly all of ”cissexism” is actually based in and enacted through trans/misogyny, as are the ways trans men have access to of navigating through it.

these play out in all social dynamics, but trans men are also able to leverage their relatively un-stigmatized place against women for their own benefit (nearly exactly similar to gay men leveraging their gay-ness to excuse their dehumanization of women) - and the typical outcome of trans man-centric trans politics is a space where trans men become beyond critique and simultaneously level narratives of oppressed-masculinity-b/c-trans as excuse and justification for abusive male behavior and female-socialization as gaslighting aimed at making women unable to name dynamics of abusive male behavior.

(for the most obvious and direct example of this, see literally every trans man who has been exposed as a rapist by survivors on tumblrs justification for why he is not a rapist.)

This ”analysis” is based on actually being involved a multitude of groups(womens/dyke/queer/trans communities) that inevitably involve trans men (and trans womens unfortunate forced social proximity to trans men) and watching the same dynamics play out over and over again.