He continued:

"We test new equipment all the time. We test new guns, new vests, new shields, new things for police cars all the time. That doesn't mean that we're going to go with that particular product. We just want to see if it works."

OPD spokesperson Michelle Guido told Orlando Sentinel that the chief didn't know the cameras downtown are also part of the program when he first spoke about it. However, she didn't explain the circumstances around it either, such as when the cameras with Rekognition were installed in a public area and why the chief didn't know about them in the first place.

During his speech, Mina said he would share the locations of the public cameras with Rekognition, but the department later declined to divulge that info, citing "security risks." Mina also said that he doesn't know whether those cameras' footage are uploaded to any Amazon server.

ACLU attorney Matt Cagle said in a statement:

"After misleading the people of Orlando, the Orlando Police Department has finally confirmed that it is indeed using Amazon's face surveillance technology on public cameras. Now, it's up to Amazon. Will it stop selling dangerous technology to the government? Or will it continue compromising customer privacy and endangering communities of color, protesters, and immigrants, who are already under attack in the current political climate?"

Privacy advocates are concerned that authorities could abuse their power using Amazon's facial recognition tech. They could, for instance, track immigrants or people participating in peaceful protests. Considering a lot of facial recognition technologies still have a hard time identifying people of color, they could put innocent people in trouble, as well. Mina reiterated, however, that facial recognition can help authorities catch murder suspects and stalkers, and that they'd "never use this technology to track random citizens, immigrants, political activists or, certainly, people of color."