Dogma

I have read several posts about myself that have been produced right up to recently stating that I should be forced to go to court to face charges of identity theft. I wonder if any of these people actually realise that my legal actions against multiple people in the space involve my demonstrating my role as the sole creator of bitcoin.

The argument is created that the crypto elite don’t believe me or that I haven’t suitably impressed them. These are self-appointed authorities with no real knowledge of blockchain, and deftly no understanding of bitcoin who have copied my software and broken many of the features. Before bitcoin in 2012, one of the principal authors on the bitcoin Core Ethereum front was close to being homeless and unemployable. Now he begs for money selling the dogma are associated with the self-appointed crypto priesthood.

There is a reason for this hierarchy, of course. It is used in the Ponzi that is BTC and associated systems to falsely sell the concept of wealth through merely holding coins as a system for takedown government and destroy global banking.

And yet the people following this religion believe that they are decentralised and outside the control of governments for the mere fact that they have been told. A decade ago, I was asked about why I created bitcoin as a commodity system in the manner that I did. This relates to the concept of why bitcoin is a protocol that was set in stone. If you have a variable supply, you need to manipulate the system. Once this occurs, it is no longer decentralised.

As soon as you start modifying the system to realign it…. as soon as you can change it to introduce something like lightning that is designed to lose records, you have a system of control by a few individuals. Bitcoin Core is a partnership. Worse than that, it is an association that acts in a cult-like manner as if they maintained a source of truth and that anyone who questions that is a heretic. Unfortunately for them, they have no source of truth. In saying that people do not believe me because the crypto elite, people whom I despise don’t believe me matters is to miss the entire purpose of bitcoin. It is not a system designed to take down governments nor banks. It doesn’t act outside of the law. It can be confiscated and when transactions are more substantial than a few hundred dollars’ worth, is the most straightforward system on this planet to be seized. Yet, for those suffering the illusion that bitcoin has become for some following the hijacking into BTC and associated forks away from the goals of bitcoin, the cognitive disjunction that they suffer would never allow them to see the error and what they have been falsely promoting. It astounds me that people believe in the cyberpunk lies. Bitcoin doesn’t create a system that destroys the old, it reinjury bitcoin reintroduces concepts of law and atomic structures of property ownership that digital systems precluded. That is, the ability to copy files without consequence can be negated and removed using bitcoin. The entire problem with copyright law in the digital age stems from the simplicity provided by computers in the early days in breaching this requirement of property. Bitcoin does not remove the traditional aspects of the law that have built society; it enhances them.

We have crossed a tipping point this year. As we go forward, I will destroy the myths and then allow the government to destroy every single system that seeks anonymity using a blockchain. With hundreds of years of common law that is associated with pseudonymity and identity, it is astounding that people believe that you needed a digital signature algorithm to demonstrate the creation of intellectual property or identity. While at the same time, these people do not realise that a digital signature algorithm is not a methodology that allows you to create a signature without first having an identity.

The problem with the mentality of the bucket shop trader is that they watch little squiggly lines and believe that this gives them insight into the working of the universe and an ability to predict what will happen in a chaotic system such as trading where they have no knowledge of the system itself. It is unfortunate, but such individuals always end up thrown under of us and manipulated by more technically market savvy operators.

A significant part of the problem in any response of this form is a lack of understanding of the fundamentals. It is one of the problems with pseudo-knowledge systems such as Wikipedia. It relies on what some people will argue was the wisdom of crowds, but wisdom is only derived from crowds and markets where something is at risk. The alternative is in many instances a delivery of mass delusion and groupthink. When this is applied to monetary systems and trading, not doing real research leads to a loss of more than many can imagine. It’s all too easy to sell a system like bitcoin based on the false premises of other cryptocurrency systems and yet to not point out that bitcoin is in no way decentralised because many nodes run the software. It’s decentralised because the platform doesn’t change. If bitcoin is not a fixed protocol, it is not decentralised, and hence it is not bitcoin.

As for being unconfiscatable, I’m going to enjoy seeing all of the people with this mass delusion awaken to find just how easy it is to seize bitcoin. Many freezing orders have already been applied across many bitcoin holdings around the world. The next step will be to have individuals regain bitcoin and related systems that have copied my protocol.

I’m sorry to tell you, but I will never do things the way you want. I will never jump through the hoops that your priests want to prove their dogma. I created bitcoin for the reason that opposes everything that bitcoin core seeks, and without the understanding of the system that is essential for any developer working on it to have, these individuals are about to find the world is built without solidity.