Disclaimer: As per usual the same rule applies. Of course this article is not directed at all women. Just entitled narcissists living in a delusional bubble of female entitlement.

It never ceases to amaze me how quickly some women in the media like to tell men what to do with their own lives and dictate to men what they owe women, as if their vagina gives them some magical higher station in life. Here is yet another one of these articles linked here, explaining to men that they are utilities for women’s benefit and attempting to shame them into conformity. I expect articles like this to become all the more common over the coming years, as more and more women like the columnist, begin to realise that men, particularly young men, really don’t care what they think anymore and won’t play ball regardless of the guilt trips and shaming they employ. It is amusing and rather pathetic at the same time, to see these grown up children posing as independent women, erupt when they don’t get what they want from men.

I really feel sorry for women that the mainstream media seems to want these children to speak on your behalf and tell men what do. It has not gone unnoticed by me, or by other men, that the media likes to pick the worst of womankind and give them space to promote their garbage. It is simple really. Women have a choice, they can either accept the responsibilities, obligations and accountability that comes with being equals to men, or they can resort to temper tantrums and passive aggressive shaming tactics when they don't get their own way, like little girls.

The article begins honestly enough as they usually do, before the predictable segway into hypocrisy. Should people and particularly men, give seats to elderly or pregnant women on trains and buses? Sure in my opinion and so should women. But the gender is irrelevant here. If I see an elderly man, or a father carrying around an infant, I am just as likely to offer him a seat. Then of course the article takes it’s predictable declining path. I won’t bother to repeat the column word for word, just read it if you can stand the narcissism and entitlement wafting off the pages. Quoting directly from the article when the author makes some bizarre reference to the Golden Girls, the bigotry is there in print for all to read:

"....a line in the last season of The Golden Girls where she explains to a suitor: “I don’t want to be treated like your equal. No! I want to be treated much better than you.” That should be the ideal all women strive for in life. It’s not only pregnant woman who deserve to be treated with all due deference."

The message in the article is clear. According to the columnist, women should be treated as equals to men when it is convenient, but be given special privileges when sexist double standards benefit women. Suddenly sexism is no longer a problem when women are benefiting at men’s expense, even to the point where men are dying. Of course if you reversed the genders, it is suddenly misogyny, but if men get the short end of the stick it is all ok. Yeah that is perfectly consistent logic. Then again who said the column was logical?