President Trump Donald John TrumpBiden on Trump's refusal to commit to peaceful transfer of power: 'What country are we in?' Romney: 'Unthinkable and unacceptable' to not commit to peaceful transition of power Two Louisville police officers shot amid Breonna Taylor grand jury protests MORE's retweet calling to extend his term by two years was made in jest, according to White House officials and other people close to the president.

White House aides told The Washington Post that the president has not privately discussed extending his term, which would violate the Constitution, and that the tweet was not serious.

ADVERTISEMENT

Trump on Sunday retweeted Liberty University President Jerry Falwell Jr., who suggested that Trump's term be extended by two years "for time stolen by this corrupt failed coup," alluding to the special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russia's election interference.

Trump also tweeted Sunday that "they have stolen two years of my (our) Presidency (Collusion Delusion) that we will never be able to get back."

The tweets come as Speaker Nancy Pelosi Nancy PelosiHoyer: House should vote on COVID-19 aid — with or without a bipartisan deal Ruth Bader Ginsburg lies in repose at Supreme Court McCarthy threatens motion to oust Pelosi if she moves forward with impeachment MORE (D-Calif.) said she was worried that Trump would challenge the legitimacy of the 2020 election if he lost the White House.

White House spokesman Hogan Gidley responded to the president's tweets by calling out Democrats' reaction to Attorney General William Barr Bill BarrHarris faces pivotal moment with Supreme Court battle Hillicon Valley: DOJ proposes tech liability shield reform to Congress | Treasury sanctions individuals, groups tied to Russian malign influence activities | House Republican introduces bill to set standards for self-driving cars McCarthy threatens motion to oust Pelosi if she moves forward with impeachment MORE's conclusions on the Mueller investigation.

"How hilariously ironic that it’s the Democrats who refuse to accept the results of a free and fair presidential election in 2016, refuse to accept the clear results of a nearly 400-page report that showed no collusion and no obstruction, but now, they have the audacity to question the president ‘accepting results?’ — give me a break," he said, according to the Post.

When asked about the president's retweet, Sen. Lindsey Graham Lindsey Olin GrahamSenate GOP aims to confirm Trump court pick by Oct. 29: report The Hill's Campaign Report: GOP set to ask SCOTUS to limit mail-in voting Senate GOP sees early Supreme Court vote as political booster shot MORE (R-S.C.), a staunch Trump ally in the Senate, laughed and said, “I think y’all people are crazy,” according to the newspaper.

“When it comes to Trump, people need to dial it back a little bit,” he said, adding that when he facetiously suggested Trump get a third term “people went nuts.”

Sen. John Cornyn John CornynThe Hill's Campaign Report: GOP set to ask SCOTUS to limit mail-in voting Liberal super PAC launches ads targeting vulnerable GOP senators over SCOTUS fight Senate GOP faces pivotal moment on pick for Supreme Court MORE (R-Texas) told the Post that the retweet exemplified the president's sense of humor and frustration with the Mueller probe.

"The president has sort of a dry sense of humor,” Cornyn said. “He obviously understands that’s not possible but I take his point that there’s been two years of distractions based on claims that proved not to be substantiated. So again I understand his frustration.”

Last month, the Justice Department released a redacted version of Mueller's report on Russia's election meddling in 2016.

Before that, Barr released a short summary of the report saying that Mueller's team did not find conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia and that there was not enough evidence to pursue an obstruction of justice charge against the president.

That summary came under scrutiny last week after Senate Democrats published a letter Mueller wrote to Barr accusing him of creating "public confusion" and not grasping the full context in the summary about the probe's results.