Article content continued

The second accuser, who worked as a summer student in Brown’s office in 2013, also maintained he fed her drinks following a Barrie hockey fundraiser and, during an after-party at his home, kissed her without permission then tried to pressure her into sex in his bedroom, which she described to CTV as a “sexual assault.”

John Galianos, who has conducted polygraph tests for some 40 years and has extensive expertise and credentials, asked Brown a series of questions about both sets of allegations.

Brown was asked whether he asked the first accuser to perform oral sex on him, whether he put his penis in her mouth, whether he exposed himself to her, and whether he was lying about denying he received oral sex from her.

In each case, Brown not only answered truthfully, Galianos said, but exceeded the standards use to determine truth by the FBI and RCMP.

“There was no deception,” he told the Sun.

Regarding the second set of allegations, Brown was asked to explain his version of what happened — specifically that the second accuser came into his bedroom and kissed him, not the other way around as she described. And that afterwards, because he felt she might be embarrassed, he drove her home.

Again, Brown showed no sign of deception, Galianos said.

Brown was tested twice, once on each set of allegations, to ensure no “contamination” between the two sets of allegations took place, he said.

“Upon evaluating the lengthy pre-test interviews and the polygraphic charts, I am of the opinion that Mr. Patrick Brown is being truthful while answering the relevant questions asked of him during the tests,” Galianos said at the conclusion of his seven-page report.