The video game website Kotaku posted what could be seen as a massive spoiler for Batman: Arkham City on its front page. That's all I'm going to say about the content—the information is everywhere at this point, and you're welcome to visit the site if you'd like to see what I'm referring to—but it raises a basic question: can major plot points of video games legitimately be considered "news"?

Many readers say no; reactions in the comments to the story and on Twitter have been both numerous and negative. Kotaku isn't backing down, however, and claims that the plot point is news and it's their job to report it.

"When a publisher includes such an extraordinary moment as part of their press preview—and when that news is the most high-profile thing they're showing—then I don't see how it doesn't merit headline treatment," Kotaku deputy editor Stephen Totillo wrote in the story's comments section. "If the game creators didn't want gamers to know, then why in the world would they include it in their presentations to the press?"

The spoiler is likely to be talked about in the comments to this story, and it's hard to really give this issue context without sharing the information. But, in my view, gamers should generally have the option of finding out this sort of thing, or at least get a sporting chance to avoid some aspect of the story being revealed to them.

When I visited Kotaku this morning, the story was right there on the front page, written as a flat declarative statement. There was no way to avoid the spoiler. While it's common to be given major plot information during hands-on previews of games, it's part of the job to know what you should filter out—or at least what you should hide behind spoiler tags so that people can experience the story fresh for themselves, if that's their choice.

"We were surprised they let the plot point be known, too, but that doesn't mean we are then going to start trying to second-guess them and the rest of the media and selectively omit prominent news that is part of promotion for a game," Totilo continued.

Good games journalists try to think critically about what they're shown and how to best serve readers in presenting that information. Otherwise, they can cease to become press and end up becoming promoters instead. In this case, I'm not convinced the presentation served readers—but I want your take. How would you have handled the situation?