In forty years of covering Washington politics, I have never seen anything like President Trump Donald John TrumpBarr criticizes DOJ in speech declaring all agency power 'is invested in the attorney general' Military leaders asked about using heat ray on protesters outside White House: report Powell warns failure to reach COVID-19 deal could 'scar and damage' economy MORE’s amazing rise to power.

But I have seen presidents laid low by botched Congressional investigations that lead to special prosecutors.

That’s why I’m starting to feel like I’ve seen this movie before.

ADVERTISEMENT

Spoiler Alert: This political thriller ends with the president’s top aides striking plea bargains with federal prosecutors to reduce prison sentences.

The U.S. has a rich recent history of special prosecutors. The odds are rising that one more is coming to look into alleged links between the Trump campaign and Russia.

The dwindling trust in the GOP majority in Congress to conduct such a probe is due to the fading credibility of the Senate Intelligence Committee. The problem is that the Republican chairman of that panel, Sen. Richard Burr Richard Mauze BurrRep. Mark Walker says he's been contacted about Liberty University vacancy Overnight Defense: Trump rejects major cut to military health care | Senate report says Trump campaign's Russia contacts posed 'grave' threat Senate report describes closer ties between 2016 Trump campaign, Russia MORE (R-N.C.), is widely perceived as a Trump acolyte.

When FBI director James Comey announced shortly before last year’s election that his agents had reopened their investigation into Hillary Clinton Hillary Diane Rodham ClintonBarr criticizes DOJ in speech declaring all agency power 'is invested in the attorney general' Virginia Democrat blasts Trump's 'appalling' remark about COVID-19 deaths in 'blue states' The Hill's Campaign Report: Biden asks if public can trust vaccine from Trump ahead of Election Day | Oklahoma health officials raised red flags before Trump rally MORE’s emails, Burr cheered the “gift.” Back then, he bragged there is “not a separation between me and Donald Trump.”

Last month, it was revealed that Burr was one of the Republicans asked by White House chief of staff Reince Priebus to speak with reporters to downplay damaging news stories about Trump campaign contacts with the Russians.

Sen. Charles Schumer Chuck SchumerDemocrats scramble on COVID-19 relief amid division, Trump surprise Pelosi, Schumer 'encouraged' by Trump call for bigger coronavirus relief package Schumer, Sanders call for Senate panel to address election security MORE (D-N.Y.), the top Democrat in the Senate, had been slow to bury Burr with a call for a special prosecutor, perhaps seeking to avoid charges that he was politicizing the probe.

But on NBC's "Meet the Press" on Sunday, Schumer did make that call. A special prosecutor was necessary, he asserted, to probe "whether the Trump campaign was complicit in working with the Russians to influence the election."

Now Republicans, including Sens. Lindsey Graham Lindsey Olin GrahamSenate Republicans signal openness to working with Biden Loeffler calls for hearing in wake of Netflix's 'Cuties' Quinnipiac poll shows Graham, Harrison tied in South Carolina Senate race MORE (S.C.), Marco Rubio Marco Antonio RubioHillicon Valley: DOJ indicts Chinese, Malaysian hackers accused of targeting over 100 organizations | GOP senators raise concerns over Oracle-TikTok deal | QAnon awareness jumps in new poll Intelligence chief says Congress will get some in-person election security briefings Republican Senators raise concerns over Oracle-TikTok deal MORE (Fla.) and Susan Collins Susan Margaret CollinsThe Hill's Campaign Report: Biden asks if public can trust vaccine from Trump ahead of Election Day | Oklahoma health officials raised red flags before Trump rally Gideon leads Collins by 12 points in Maine Senate race: poll Senate leaders quash talk of rank-and-file COVID-19 deal MORE (Maine), are starting to peel away. Graham has said that if Attorney General Jeff Sessions Jefferson (Jeff) Beauregard SessionsTrump's policies on refugees are as simple as ABCs Ocasio-Cortez, Velázquez call for convention to decide Puerto Rico status White House officials voted by show of hands on 2018 family separations: report MORE spoke with Russian diplomats, “then for sure you need a special prosecutor.”

On cue, last week Sessions had to recuse himself from the FBI’s probes into the Trump campaign’s ties to Russia after the Washington Post revealed he met with the Russian ambassador to the U.S. twice last year. Those details seemed to contradict sworn testimony he gave during his Senate confirmation hearing.

Even former President George W. Bush told NBC’s “Today” last week, “we all need answers” on the current president’s ties to Russia.

If trust in the Senate probe is weak, then the credibility of any House investigation is even weaker.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) served with Sessions on Trump’s presidential transition team. Nunes was also one of the lawmakers actively recruited by Priebus to counter stories about Trump’s ties to Russia.

Nunes gave a rambling press conference last week in which he said he did not want the committee’s investigation to turn into a “witch-hunt” and warned of “McCarthyism” where innocent Americans were “haul[ed] before Congress.”

Rep. Adam Schiff Adam Bennett SchiffOvernight Defense: House to vote on military justice bill spurred by Vanessa Guillén death | Biden courts veterans after Trump's military controversies Intelligence chief says Congress will get some in-person election security briefings Democrats, advocates seethe over Florida voting rights ruling MORE (Calif.), the lead Democrat on the committee, further diminished trust in any House probe when he said last week that the FBI director refused to share with the committee more than “a fraction of what the FBI knows.”

Rep. Darrell Issa, the California Republican who was a bulldog when he chaired the House Oversight Committee during the Obama years, told Bill Maher that the situation warranted a special prosecutor. Later he changed his tune, saying he was willing to wait. But Issa’s backpedalling took place before Sessions recused himself.

And last week, we learned that the Trump White House Counsel’s office issued a memo to all White House staff instructing them to preserve all documents related to Russia.

If history is a guide, all that is left now is for public pressure to build on the GOP and the special prosecutor to be named.

Here’s a quick look at that history:

During the Iran-Contra affair, President Reagan tried to put the scandal behind him by agreeing to the appointment of a special prosecutor, Lawrence Walsh. Walsh indicted several of Reagan's top aides, including Defense Secretary Caspar "Cap" Weinberger.

During President Clinton's first term, shady controversies from his time as governor of Arkansas led to the appointment of the special prosecutor Kenneth Starr and set the stage for the Monica Lewinsky sex story that resulted in Clinton's impeachment.

President George W. Bush's Attorney General, John Ashcroft, recused himself from a White House probe. His deputy then appointed an independent special counsel to find out who leaked the name of a CIA agent. That special prosecutor, Patrick Fitzgerald, won the conviction of the Vice President's chief of staff, Lewis ‘Scooter’ Libby.

Sen. John McCain John Sidney McCainKelly's lead widens to 10 points in Arizona Senate race: poll COVID response shows a way forward on private gun sale checks Trump pulls into must-win Arizona trailing in polls MORE (R-Ariz.) recently said that he has “more hope than belief” that the GOP Congress will properly investigate Trump’s ties to Russia.

"Have no doubt, what the Russians tried to do to our election could have destroyed democracy," McCain said.

Julius Caesar feared the “Ides of March” with good reason. As the middle of the month approaches, President Trump and his GOP supporters will be under fearsome pressure to go along with the naming of a special prosecutor.

Juan Williams is an author, and a political analyst for Fox News Channel.

The views expressed by contributors are their own and are not the views of The Hill.