The court found there was a "significant possibility" an innocent person has been convicted. The High Court judgment, although a relief to 78-year-old Pell, leaves Australia’s most senior Catholic facing an invidious task to restore his reputation. "I have consistently maintained my innocence while suffering from a serious injustice," Cardinal Pell said in a statement released soon after the court's judgment. "This has been remedied today, with the High Court's unanimous decision. I look forward to reading the judgment, and reasons for the decision in detail.

"I hold no ill will toward my accuser. I do not want my acquittal to add to the hurt and bitterness so many feel. There is certainly hurt and bitterness enough." The end of criminal proceedings clears the way for the federal government to publish previously redacted royal commission findings into Cardinal Pell’s conduct in Ballarat, a centre of historic church sex abuse. Cardinal Pell and the church are also facing a fresh wave of civil legal action by abuse survivors. The High Court decision does not repudiate Cardinal Pell’s accuser, a former choirboy who testified that he and a friend were indecently assaulted more than 20 years ago by Cardinal Pell, who was archbishop of Melbourne, at St Patrick’s Cathedral. Cardinal Pell’s senior counsel, Bret Walker, SC, and Victoria’s Director of Public Prosecutions, Kerri Judd, QC, agreed in their submissions to the court that the choirboy was a credible, believable witness.

Rather, the decision exposes flaws within the rest of the prosecution case; evidence given by other witnesses who were at St Patrick’s at the time which raised doubts about whether Cardinal Pell had an opportunity to commit the crimes he was accused of. The High Court found this evidence should have caused a jury to have reasonable doubt about Cardinal Pell’s guilt. It should also have caused the Court of Appeal majority, Chief Justice Anne Ferguson and Court of Appeal President Chris Maxwell, to have misgivings about the jury’s verdict. "While the Court of Appeal majority assessed the evidence of the opportunity witnesses as leaving open the possibility that the complainant's account was correct, their Honours' analysis failed to engage with the question of whether there remained a reasonable possibility that the offending had not taken place," the court found. The botched decision of Victoria’s highest court extended by seven months Cardinal Pell’s time in jail.

Loading Replay Replay video Play video Play video Supreme Court Justice Mark Weinberg, in a lengthy dissenting judgment, described the testimony of the "opportunity witnesses" as "a significant body of cogent evidence casting serious doubt upon the complainant’s account". The former choirboy first told police in 2015 that he and a fellow chorister were indecently assaulted by Cardinal Pell in 1996 after he caught them drinking altar wine in the priest’s sacristy shortly after Sunday mass. The second choirboy died of a drug overdose in 2014, having previously denied to his mother that he was abused by Cardinal Pell. Cardinal Pell was convicted in December 2018 on one charge of sexual penetration of a child and four charges of an indecent act against a child. He was sentenced to six years in jail, with a minimum of three years and eight months.

Separate criminal proceedings against Cardinal Pell, based on allegations by multiple witnesses that he sexually abused them at a Ballarat swimming pool nearly 50 years ago, were discontinued by the DPP. Cardinal Pell’s case before the High Court was that it was not open to a jury, on the whole of the evidence, to find him guilty as charged, and that the Victorian Court of Appeal majority erred in law by upholding the verdict. Loading Mr Walker told the court that the approach taken by justices Ferguson and Maxwell, in weighing the testimony of the choirboy against other evidence in the case, had the effect of reversing the onus of proof.

This argument was rejected by Ms Judd, who submitted that the Court of Appeal majority properly reviewed the evidence and had left no question of law for the High Court to resolve. Ms Judd submitted to the court that, in the event of a successful appeal, the case should be remitted back to the Court of Appeal to be heard again. Instead, the High Court ordered Cardinal Pell's conviction be quashed. Cardinal Pell learned of the decision from inside his isolation cell at Barwon Prison, home to some of the state’s most dangerous murders and terrorists. "My trial was not a referendum on the Catholic Church, nor a referendum on how Church authorities in Australia dealt with the crime of paedophilia in the Church," he said.