Uber Got Off the Hook for Killing a Pedestrian with its Self-Driving Car

Who killed Elaine Herzberg? Not the driver of the car that ran her over — because there was no driver. And therein lies a problem.

Arizona prosecutors’ decision to not criminally charge Uber for the March self-driving-car death of Herzberg signals that tech companies won’t be punished for taking egregious risks with their untested technology even when the worst happens — in this case, the crash death of Herzberg, a homeless woman in Tempe who became the first person killed by a self-driving car.

Uber has already settled a civil case with Herzberg’s family. And the National Transportation Safety Board has yet to release its full findings of an ongoing investigation. And local authorities say that the car’s “backup driver” may still be charged with vehicular manslaughter because she was watching “The Voice” on her phone when the car hit Herzberg. She did not hit the brakes until after the collision.

But Uber isn’t blameless; a preliminary report by NTSB found that Uber had deactivated the car’s emergency braking system. And that decision comes down to money. Self-driving cars can be programmed to brake whenever there is an object that the computer system can’t identify, which in tech jargon is called an “edge case.” But programming the car that way can make the journey jerky and nauseating. Uber was in a rush to start its self-driving taxi service that summer, so it had programmed the car to take chances.

Indeed, the car’s detection system had noticed Herzberg six seconds before the collision. But it did not brake because it read her shape — she was pushing a bicycle with bags — as benign.

Advocates for Herzberg — and, indeed, future victims of autonomous vehicles — were disappointed in how the Yavapai County Attorney handled the case

“How is it that … Uber can experiment with potentially deadly technology in public, but two women are paying the price for it?” Jim McPherson, an attorney who works in the transportation sector and writes about self-driving safety issues, told Streetsblog.

The National Highway Transportation Safety Administration and Congress have taken a hands-off approach to regulating self-driving car companies. There are no special regulations to ensure the safety of these vehicles at this time.

Instead, the feds are relying on companies to police themselves — and the Herzberg case is a good example of the problem with that approach. The District Attorney’s decision to not hold Uber criminally responsible is reminiscent of how law enforcement officials rarely hold drivers accountable for crashes under the outmoded and car-friendly belief that it was just “an accident” — as if no one had any agency at all.

Uber suspended its self-driving vehicle operation following Herzberg’s death, but plans to resume operations in some cities this summer, according to reports.