A drone is to be sent to the area to make sure the box has not been unburied.

With the current wording, the drone is only sent once, and not on a regular basis, to check if the SCP is still buried. Also, why bother burying it so far away from everything? Why not just bring it to a site and keep knowledge about it a secret.

If this requires using any Amnestics over Class-D Amnestics, this person is to be terminated for their own sake.

Drop the "For their own sake", as that's poor tone. Amnestics also doesn't need to be capitalized.

SCP-xxx is not to be included in any other foundation archives

Foundation should always be capitalized, as it's a proper noun.

SCP-xxx is a 25cm x 34cm x 46cm stone statue of an ant-like insect from unknown origins.

If the SCP is a statue, all three vertices of measurement are unneeded. Just use one, and the reader will be able to assume the thing's size. Also. "From unknown origin" is kind of a pointless thing to say in an article. If the Foundation knew where it comes from, they'd write as such. If they don't, why would they bother saying they don't know? The decription also fails to actually describe the SCP. We know it looks like an insect, and that's it. What it's made of would be one thing they'd be able to test and would include.

This article also claims it's an ant-like creature but the image included later in the article is very clearly a spider.

According to Dr. Schneil, it's at the foundation since 20██. All experiments and research run on SCP-xxx ended up unsuccessful.

These sentences do not belong so high in the description. The anomalies history is less important than the anomaly itself, when it comes to the description. The order I suggest when it comes to writing description is like this:

Physical Description

Anomaly description

Personality / Non-anomalous description

Misc info, including history or backstory

Also, I have a hard time believeing that all experiments and research conducted on the SCP have failed. We can set up automatic tests using drones and technology.

Whenever SCP-xxx is thought of by anybody, that person will fall asleep.

It's present throughout the draft, but I'm bringing it up here to cover the rest. The tone in this article is rather poor. Using this sentence as an example, it's poor tone as it's too casual and not clear enough. Yes, it explains what's going on, but it does so through inexact terms. Good tone is reliant on being as clear and concise as possible. I could probably condense the first two sentences into a single sentence with proper tone.

SCP-xxx is a 25cm tall spider-like statue, that exhibits an infohazarduous property causing affected people to immediately fall unconscious.

t takes approximately 9 seconds for someone to fall asleep after thinking of SCP-xxx with the longest recorded time being around 32 seconds. The sleeping subject cannot be wakened and must awake themselves, the length of the sleep is approximately 3 hours. The shortest sleeping time recorded is 1h28min and the longest sleeping time recorded is of 5h46min.

The longest and shortest sleeping times and falling asleep times are superfluous, and should be removed.

Incident-FRGT:

This entire Incident is just kind of the Foundation holding the Idiot Ball. I'm fairly sure people working at the Foundation would be smart enough to realize what caused this sudden sleep by looking at whatever object or box they were holding. I'd also be concerned that they're immediately sending the information to people on the O5 Command. Finding a new anomaly isn't really something that the Foundation would alert them to, cause there are far better things the O5s can be doing with their time.

Think of it like this. If you were working for a big company, and you were looking through the career drive from a retired person at your company, and you found an old project that could be helpful, you wouldn't go running to the board of directors to tell them about it.

Interviewer: Dr. Bright

There's a pretty big stigma against using characters from the LolFoundation era, as it's often difficult to write them well. That's not to say you can't, but more often than not the characters and how we perceive them has evolved.

Dr. Schneil: Shit, that's SCP-xxx! god fucking damn it, oh well goodni-

Dr. Schneil proceeds to fall asleep.

Dr. Bright proceeds to fall asleep.

This is dumb, and not the good kind of dumb. This is people being written in a way that doesn't make them feel like humans or even just characters.

In regards to the Interview over all, it's kind of pointless. You've already informed us what the anomaly is and told us about the Incident, so this interview does not give us any new information or show us a different understanding to the information that we did not consider before.

The collapsible with the picture

First of all, the quote from Bright here is pretty against his character, both his LolFoundation days character and the current interpretations. This infohazard is harmless at worst. It just causes people to sleep, so he'd probably find it mildly amusing. Plus, if it's an infohazard, why include the image at all? Wouldn't that just cause it to activate? Lastly, the image is very clearly a 3d Model, which really hurts my suspension of disbelief.