There you have it. “Islamophobia” is intolerable. Bombs designed to cause maximum pain, mutilation and dismemberment of our babies flesh and bone at a pop concert — not so much. But “islamophobia”? Intolerable. That is sharia, and that is not a world which I will consent to live. Ever.

“Figures have shown a fivefold increase in the number of Islamophobic attacks since the attack at London Bridge and a 40 per cent increase in racists’ incidents.”

This includes, mind you, tweets deemed offensive to Islam.

London’s police chief: “Islamophobia” is intolerable

By Robert Spencer, June 13, 2017:

“Figures have shown a fivefold increase in the number of Islamophobic attacks since the attack at London Bridge and a 40 per cent increase in racists’ incidents.”

Given the frequency of fake anti-Muslim hate crimes, this claim must be received with skepticism.

“The terrorists seek to divide us and we must not let them do that. London is a fantastic, diverse, integrated city and that that’s the way it needs to continue.”

Actually, the terrorists don’t really care if we’re united or divided. The objective of jihad terror attacks is to weaken, and ultimately destroy, the Infidel state, so that it can be replaced by a Sharia government. When Cressida Dick vows that she is not going to let the terrorists divide us, she means that she is not going to confront their motivating ideology, since the Muslim community in London doesn’t want her to do so. So in reality, when she says that she is not going to let the terrorists divide us, she means that she is going to follow a course of action that will weaken London’s response to jihad terror, and enable jihadis to act more freely.

Also, where is Cressida Dick saying that jihad massacres are intolerable?

“Islamophobia is intolerable, says London police chief,” Pakistan Today, June 11, 2017 (thanks to Lookmann):