Text Size: A- A+

New Delhi: The BJP seems to have quietly buried its promised disciplinary action against Pragya Singh Thakur — the main accused in the Malegaon bomb blast and now a party MP from Bhopal.

Thakur had described Mahatma Gandhi’s assasin Nathuram Godse as a patriot, causing nationwide outrage during the Lok Sabha election campaign. In a damage-control exercise, the BJP had announced on 17 May that her case was being referred to the party’s disciplinary action committee.

BJP president Amit Shah had then given the committee 10 days to come up with a detailed report for further action. It’s been exactly a month since and there has been no word.



Reason: The three-member disciplinary action committee was virtually defunct in the first place when the case was referred to it, with its chairperson having been appointed a governor and another member having already resigned.



Also read: Difference between Pragya Thakur and LK Advani is only in the shade of Hindutva



An inactive committee

The BJP’s disciplinary committee normally consists of three members. When the Pragya Thakur case was referred to it, however, one of its members, Ganeshi Lal, was by then appointed as Odisha governor. Vijaya Chakravarti, another member, had resigned for personal reasons.

The third member was Satyadev Singh, who is also the president of the UP BJP disciplinary committee. He is already burdened with more than 100 cases of sabotage and other indiscipline complaints filed by the state BJP.

According to Satyadev Singh, when the Pragya Thakur case was referred to the committee, it neither had a president nor a secretary. He told ThePrint that he felt a one-man committee would not be able to take a decision in such a high-profile case and had hence requested BJP general secretary Ram Lal to either take a decision on suspending Thakur on his own or to refer it to party president Amit Shah.



Also read: In 1964, calling Godse patriot led to uproar in Parliament. Now, Pragya Thakur gets approval



New members



On 4 June, much after the 10-day deadline had lapsed, the party finally nominated two new members — Avinash Rai Khanna from Punjab and Om Pathak from UP — to the committee. When ThePrint asked Pathak about the progress in the case, he said that he was not authorised to speak on the issue.

Khanna pointed to the office of BJP secretary Mahendra Pandey, saying that the records of the committee’s meetings in the case were in his office. He added that as far as he knew, no final decision has been taken on the issue and the ball is in Amit Shah’s court now.

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Why news media is in crisis & How you can fix it You are reading this because you value good, intelligent and objective journalism. We thank you for your time and your trust. You also know that the news media is facing an unprecedented crisis. It is likely that you are also hearing of the brutal layoffs and pay-cuts hitting the industry. There are many reasons why the media’s economics is broken. But a big one is that good people are not yet paying enough for good journalism. We have a newsroom filled with talented young reporters. We also have the country’s most robust editing and fact-checking team, finest news photographers and video professionals. We are building India’s most ambitious and energetic news platform. And have just turned three. At ThePrint, we invest in quality journalists. We pay them fairly. As you may have noticed, we do not flinch from spending whatever it takes to make sure our reporters reach where the story is. This comes with a sizable cost. For us to continue bringing quality journalism, we need readers like you to pay for it. If you think we deserve your support, do join us in this endeavour to strengthen fair, free, courageous and questioning journalism. Please click on the link below. Your support will define ThePrint’s future. Support Our Journalism

Show Full Article