WikiLeaks has released a fourth batch of emails from Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta. They cover a number of issues highlighting the campaign's cozy relation with media outlets and more scathing remarks about the Bernie Sanders campaign.

The latest leak contains 1,193 new emails and it comes just a day after the whistleblowing website released another batch of 1,190.

MORE: As many as 1190 emails are part of the latest #podestaemails release from Wikileaks https://t.co/KiHPnnIKADpic.twitter.com/9FPEOTIxTX — RT America (@RT_America) October 11, 2016

Bernie Sanders

As with previous releases, there are a number of emails discussing Bernie Sanders and his bid to be the Democratic presidential nominee.

In an email dated March 20, 2014, Mark Siegel, a former executive director of the DNC, advised Tamera Luzzatto, who previously worked with Hillary Clinton, on how best to keep the “Bernie people… marginally on board."

"If we ‘give’ Bernie this in the Convention's rules committee, his people will think they've ‘won’ something from the Party Establishment," Siegel wrote. "And it functionally doesn't make any difference anyway. They win. We don't lose. Everyone is happy."

Also included is an email chain which followed the outrage over the Iowa caucus being decided on a coin toss back in February. Tina Flourney forwarded CNN Director of Political Research Robert Yoon’s email explaining the format to Robbie Mook.

“And now he's fundraising off of it,” Flourney said, referring to the Sanders campaign.

“Yet again, they fundraise off of lies. Christina is pushing this around,” Mook replied.

READ MORE: Clinton’s lucky quarter: Democratic frontrunner wins 6 coin tosses in narrow Iowa caucus victory

Wall Street

In January 2016, Clinton speechwriter Dan Schwerin emailed Jennifer Palmieri about handling Wall Street and Sanders in an upcoming speech, “In particular, she's keen to find a way to keep going after him on Wall Street [she's convinced his plan is naive and unworkable] as part of a broader indictment,” he said.

“I liked messing with Bernie on wall street at a staff level for the purposes of muddying the waters and throwing them off their game a bit," she said. "But don't know that it is most effective contrast for her. Seems like we are picking the fight he wants to have."

Communications advisor Mandy Grunwald replied, “I agree with you. Bernie wants a fight on a Wall Street. We should not give him one. Our polling shows this is one of our weakest areas. Further, our Wall Street approach has always been to agree about the problem, show passion about it, and say we have a better approach to holding the rascals accountable.”

“We don't need to prove he's bad on Wall Street – that's not really credible. We need to prove we're ok. Most of all, we don't want this fight,” she added.

Relationship With Media

In another example of the media’s cozy relationship with the campaign, a February email chain between Patrick Healy of the New York Times and the Clinton campaign with the subject line, ‘Hi Angel and Tina -- running stuff by you re Clinton/Trump’, discussed details of a story about how the campaign viewed Trump.

Read more

“We're told that President Clinton [like Mrs. Clinton and some other Dems] thinks that Trump would be a formidable opponent in the general election, and that Dems are in a form of denial if they dismiss Trump as a joke who would be easily defeated in November,” the email reads.

“President Clinton, like others, thinks that Trump has his finger on the pulse of the electorate's mood and that only a well-financed, concerted campaign portrayed him as dangerous and bigoted will win what both Clintons believe will be a close November election.”

The Clinton campaign was worried about the journalist’s plans to mention “President Clinton, like Secretary Clinton and some others, think Trump could pose a real threat in battleground states that President Obama carried in 2008 and 2012 – like Virginia and Ohio – and he will be competitive in Florida, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin."

“I think the first point is ok, but don’t love pointing to states where we think he’ll do well, unless that’s just a total done deal,” Deputy Communications Director Christina Reynolds said.

In a mail from Neera Tanden from July 2015 “AP” are thanked for their help in diffusing an unmentioned situation. The mail came a day after the New York Times revealed that two mails in a small sample from Clinton’s private server that were being investigated had contained top secret information.

“Tide does seem to be shifting a bit on this, great work by the press shop. Cummings is helpful as is AP,” possibly referring to the Associated Press and Elijah Cummings, a member of the House Oversight Committee who accused the Republican chairman of misusing the power of the committee to adversely influence Clinton’s bid for presidency.

“I do think that if Hillary doesn't speak to this today, people will assume she's guilty though," Tanden said in the mail. "With normal people, if you are accused of being a criminal, they expect you to deny it pronto.”

Neera suggests Hillary deny she is a criminal because that's what the "normal people" expect. #PodestaEmails4#Wikileakspic.twitter.com/ELyEx9d1jk — Lori (@iCounterSpin) October 12, 2016

A December 2015 email from Mary Pat Bonner contains attachments listing the accomplishments of two organizations, Correct the Record (CTR) and American Bridge – which formally separated in May that year, but obviously continue to work together through Bonner.

The arrangement “allows CTR to retain its independence but coordinate directly and strategically with the Hillary campaign. This work is necessary now more than ever,” according to the attached documents.

CTR has “helped write and place 36 op-eds across the country in a number of publications including Politico, Times Union, Huffington Post, CNN, Washington Blade, and New Jersey’s Bergen Record,” the attachment says.

CTR staff have given more than 900 media interviews in order to counter Republican attacks on Clinton and even “kill negative stories before they are even published.”

Read more

In a June 10, 2016 email exchange with Clinton’s special assistant Milia Fisher, Podesta is suggesting a better quote to go with a fundraising email – which is entirely based on a puff piece in the Washington Post, published the day before. The point of the story was that the campaign is so thrifty that Podesta and other staff take the bus.

“You have my word that we're going to use your grassroots donations as wisely as we can to help make Hillary Clinton the 45th president of the United States. That means no luxury travel, no fancy office furniture, and no overpriced phone systems that we don't need,” goes the pitch.

In another instance, an email from Huma Abedin to Podesta and other staffers highlights the campaign’s constant awareness of media optics.

“We ordered Indian," Abedin writes. "Please come in for drinks and food when we get to house if you can. Cameras are there so behave accordingly :)”

Damage Control & Bill

It also shows Bill Clinton as out of touch with the public regarding an anecdote he told claiming “somebody making $110k per year” would struggle financially.

In a mail from Hillary’s campaign spokesman Josh Schwerin he warns Bill’s press secretary Angel Ureña about the potential damage the comment could do if used in public.

Clinton & the Middle Class

An email from 2015 about the upcoming December 19 primary recommends the campaign removes a reference to Clinton visiting middle class homes from the planned talking points – due to the fact Clinton had not done that.

“On the middle class tax cut. I wouldn't say ‘I've been in their homes,’” Grunwald said. “HRC has not really done a lot of that this year. Also, there is something pejorative about ‘the 'these’ in "these people don't need a tax hike."

READ MORE: ‘I’m kind of far removed’: Clinton admits estrangement from middle class in Wall Street paid speech