- video encodings still in process -

"By the time the government finds out, you'll be inthe hole thirty days" 9/11 Truther is Told By OfficerWho Admits to False Accusation of Having a BombAaron Dykes / JonesReport | April 27, 2007Two persons identifying themselves as New York policeofficers interrupted a 9/11 Truth demonstration- - on apublic sidewalk in front of the new WTC 7 Building--to intimidate free speech, stating "Larry[Silverstein] doesn't want to hear it," beforeaccusing We Are Change founder Luke Rudkowski ofhaving a bomb and that his cell phone was "a gun."The officer was apparently responding to refusals tostop filming their faces as police attempted to impedefree speech on behalf of Larry Silverstein- - makingslanderous and knowingly false accusations:"I think he's got a bomb in his bag. Saw wires comingout. Think he's got a bomb in there."The police officer carried on during the encounter,saying "A terrorist act-- I guess they go away forabout 30 days."Rudkowski tell him he is not a terrorist and that heis an American citizen. The officer responds, "You'reright. But by the time the government figures it out,you'll be in the hole for 30 days."The officer made the statements on camera with anotable smirk, and made no attempt to distance himselfor other witnesses from any physical danger (as hewould have done he actually believed the activist hada bomb). The officer went on to give away his criminalbehavior-- still on tape, despite ongoing demands heand the other officer made that the cameras be shutoff.Alex Jones commented, "We have New York police ON TAPEthreatening to frame someone for terrorism in anonchalant fashion. How bad would it have gotten ifthere were no cameras around? If they'll talk likethis ON CAMERA, heaven help us." www.encyclop edia.com/ doc/1G1-11236151 5.htmlPeople are arrested every day for joking about bombsor making other bomb references, even if it is clearlynot meant to be serious.http://news. bbc.co.uk/ nolpda/ukfs_ news/hi/newsid_ 4281000/4281814. stm?%28none% 29This man identified himself as a police officer andaccused Rudkowski of 'having a bomb' and 'being aterrorist' to silence his free speech for LarrySilverstein. It is a serious federal and state crimeto publicly state that someone has a bomb and is aterrorist when not true-- like extreme example ofyelling fire in a theater-- and needs to beprosecuted.Such knowingly misleading and false information is notonly malicious and immoral, but has been madespecifically illegal under the Anti-Hoax Terrorism Actof 2003-- and expanded for more stringency in 2004 andthe Terrorism Prevention Act of 2006, not to mentionlong-standing protections against defamation andpublic endangerment. There are also many state andlocal laws prohibiting such activity.http://thomas. loc.gov/cgi- bin/bdquery/ z?d108:s. 01441:http://thomas. loc.gov/cgi- bin/query/ z?c108:S. 2204: www.fas . org/irp/congress /2006_cr/ s3848.html www.yale . edu/lawweb/ avalon/sept_ 11/ny_001. htmThis man who identified himself as a police officerinsisted that Rudkowski and other members ofWeAreChange. org must cease videotaping him.Based on this video evidence alone, this officershould receive a prison sentence and would be liablefor civil damages as well-- not only to the wrongeddemonstrator, but by law enforcement for a dangerouswaste of resources, as cited by Ted Kennedy'scommentary regarding expansion:http://kennedy. senate.gov/ newsroom/ press_release. cfm?id=F0B71889- 81FC-4A5F- 97F9-FB5A2ABD654 B"In addition, this measure expands civil liabilityto allow federal and state governments to seekreimbursement from someone who knows that emergencypersonnel are responding to a hoax and fails to informauthorities that no such event has occurred."Rudkowski was not only intimidated by the corrupt andcriminal officer, but his camera was confiscated.Shortly afterwards, police also confiscated his cellphone, claiming that it was "a gun," according toRudkowski.The detective also snickered and "sang"tauntingly atRudkowski, "Guess who's going to jail? Guess who'sgoing to jail?"Luke was not arrested, but was detained for over anhour while police deliberated over whether takefurther action.The Face of IntimidationThe Face of RidiculeThis officer makes equal attempts to intimidate andridicule Rudkowski.Luke Rudkowski told the perpetrating policeman thathis statements were "slanderous, " denying ridiculousaccusations that he was a terrorist.The officer again responded, "I saw wires. You looklike a terrorist. I don't know what a terrorist lookslike. You may be a terrorist for all I know...You'vemade threats; now I'm concerned."It is obvious from the recorded video that thedemonstration was peaceful, no laws were broken and nothreats were made. It is also clear that the reason heapproached the group did not regard suspicion ofthreatening behavior, but to tell them that "Larrydidn't want to hear it."The levels of betrayal against the First Amendment ofthe Constitution are so absurd and violate the basictenants of original intent, they can only be comparedwith gross violations by the enforcement officers ofthe police state apparent, such as that with AbbyNewman (as seen below, from 9/11: The Road toTyranny). Egregious misinterpretation and abuseperpetrated by the very members of society supposedlyin place to guarantee our freedoms.