That the Canadian Justice System is corrupt through and through has been manifested to the world profusely with the arrest of Mark Marek and the subsequent denial of justice at all levels of judiciary. But did you know that it’s also an official fact that Canadian judiciary is one of the most corrupt in the world?

Global Integrity is a non-governmental organization (NGO) which assesses anti-corruption and good governance mechanisms in several countries around the world. The last time they did a whole world report on corruption was in 2010. Since then, their annual reports only including a couple of countries previously not assessed.

2010 was when Canada was last assessed and unsurprisingly, the Global Integrity Report found that the Canadian Justice System is one of the most corrupt in the entire world.

Global Integrity assigns each area of public sector points based on particular criteria, and once all considerations have been taken into account, the area is given a total score between 0 (absolute corruption) and 100 (no corruption). The higher the score, the less corrupt the tested area of this particular country is.

Canada’s rating for whether “judges are appointed fairly” is measly 17 – one of the lowest in the entire world. For comparison, Angola – which is a country most wouldn’t even be able to point out on a map – got 25. In other words, Angola is way less corrupt than Canada when it comes to appointing fair judges. In the same category, Ethiopia got 75, Bangladesh got 83. Even Somalia has less corrupt judiciary and scored 42 in the same category.

When assessing whether there’s “a transparent procedure for selecting national-level judges” in Canada, the answer was a straight NO. Somalia, for comparison, received a YES because in Somalia, the appointment of judges follows a public process and is based on legal qualification and competence.

In Canada, Judges Are Politically Appointed

In the USA, judges are elected at the state level. There are many recorded cases of corrupt judges who were prosecuted and thrown in jail for fixing cases or taking bribes in the USA. In Canada however, there are absolutely no recorded cases of a judge being prosecuted for corruption. Many have been exposed by their victims, but in Canada, they enjoy absolute impunity.

Likewise, in the USA, a candidate’s fitness for judicial appointment is scrutinized and assessed in an open hearing not only by their lawyer friends, but also by the general public.

In Canada, there are no elected judges. All Canadian judges are appointed to their position by the State. And you can rest assured the state ensures only the “right” people are appointed as judges.

Pierre Trudeau

It started to go fast down hill with former Prime Minister of Canada Pierre Trudeau, who re-created the Privy Council, which allowed for a supreme control of Canada by non elected persons, while greatly diminishing the role of the elected representatives of the people.

To greatly confuse the Canadian public, Pierre Trudeau also established the Canadian Judicial Council – a smoke screen body with an apparent role as a judicial watchdog. This created an illusion of an institution watching over judges, ensuring they remain fair and impartial, but the fact is that the council is an autonomous, unaccountable body that is responsible for policing itself. It’s the same idea as assigning the investigation of alleged police misconduct to the buddies of the abuser.

The Council is made up of judges who are appointed to the role by the government, and are as such selected from the pool of most “government friendly” candidates. Thus, instead of working to secure the inherited rights of a free and independent people, they work to ensure the agendas of the government are met.

Pierre Trudeau also created another great illusion in form of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Charter creates an illusion of protecting civil rights, but unlike before the Charter, it gave judges unprecedented powers. Thus, Pierre Trudeau opened doors for a judicial oligarchy that would continue to grow in power regardless of public’s opinion or their votes.

Role of Chief Justice

In 1998, a British Columbia judge John Bouck published a series of articles in which he explained to the public the mechanism of how the judiciary in Canada operates. Some speculate that this was his attempt at redeeming himself after his false judgment against Sun Belt Water Inc in 1997. He was assigned to hear that case by the Chief Justice who made it understood what ruling is expected of him. And so he followed orders of his superior. But it ate into his conscience.

Judge John Bouck explained that because some lawyers actually become judges out of sheer willingness to safeguard justice and the rule of law, the judicial corruption is secured by the role of Chief Justice. The Chief Justice is handed the absolute power to decide which judge will hear which particular case.

When the Chief Justice wants a corrupt result, he or she will select a judge to hear the case, who can be relied upon to produce the corrupt result.

Is It Possible for Inconvenient Journalists to Receive Justice in Canada

The short answer is NO. As a country with one of the world’s most corrupt judiciary systems, one that’s more corrupt than almost any judiciary in Africa, Middle East or Asia, there is simply no way for an inconvenient journalist to receive justice in Canada. Absolutely no way.

Judges are appointed to their roles by the government which is in turn controlled by the Privy Council, aka the secret government that holds the real strings of power. There is no standards Canadian judges are held to, their term in the office is not limited in any way, they never face consequence for their abuses and misuses of power, even if they intentionally and knowingly ruin an innocent life by sentencing the person to harsh penalties, including jail, and the only body that oversees their activity is composed of their carefully selected buddies who are appointed to these roles by the same government who appoints judges according to how fitting they are for the purpose of achieving the government’s goals in the first place.

No Canadian lawyer who defended freedom of speech when the Canadian regime attempted to crush it has ever been appointed a judge!

As I’ve explained in the post about the Second Generation of Tyrants, the Canadians, while vastly nice people, are also a nation of perfectly complacent sheeple. No other people on Earth have been so pussifies that they unconditionally accept the absolute power their government has over them and unconditionally surrender to it.

Most Canadians are not even aware of the fact that political participation is intentionally made impossible to them and that the politics is too a “buddy business” in their country. Most would surely get offended if you implied to them that their judiciary is one of the most corrupt in the world, and that it reflects on the entire government which keeps it that way, and which in turn make their government one of the most corrupt and tyrannical in the world. Just because Canada does it the Tyrannism v2.0 way, it doesn’t make it any less dictatorial.

That being said, even though by legal means, there is no chance for a persecuted inconvenient journalist (or for anyone the regime takes interest in) to receive justice in Canada, the only way for Tyrannism v2.0 to fuel the corruption, is if the public remains blind to it. As such, the greatest threat to Canadian corruption is that which they so vigorously strive to silence – independent journalism. That’s because independent journalism has the power to influence, or even to enforce justice, even if they want to crush it.