READER COMMENTS ON

"ANN COULTER, VOTER FRAUD FELON, GETS AWAY WITH IT"

(51 Responses so far...)





COMMENT #1 [Permalink]

... DMcD said on 12/7/2007 @ 9:11 pm PT...





FLORIDA , again; Florida should have its charter revoked and be "thrown" out of the union much less , have the right to vote , at all.

COMMENT #2 [Permalink]

... vw clown said on 12/7/2007 @ 10:36 pm PT...





I thought she might get away with this. But then, the last thing I wanted to see was more Ann Coulter on the news, even if she would be wearing an orange jumpsuit in an interview with Sean Hannity through the glass. Makes me wonder why she would do this in the first place... Any publicity is good publicity?

PS What is the actual penalty for voter fraud?

COMMENT #3 [Permalink]

... Rick said on 12/7/2007 @ 10:56 pm PT...





This blog is retarded. Did she vote multiple times? No. She just put a different address down. Big freaking deal. Perhaps you should read Ann Coulter's book, Brad. It sounds as if you have a lot to learn.

COMMENT #4 [Permalink]

... Brad Friedman said on 12/7/2007 @ 11:35 pm PT...





VW Clown - The oath that Coulter affirmed when she signed it (and, as a supposed attorney who used to care about the "rule of law" in the 90's at least, she should understand the importance of such oaths) says "I understand that if it is not true, I can be convicted of a felony of the third degree and fined up to $5,000 and/or imprisoned for up to five years." She also committed another third degree felony for receiving a drivers license under the same phony premise. And a first degree misdemeanor for voting in the wrong precinct. Ricky - Your "retarded" reference gives you away as an Ann Coulter butt buddy. That said, however, your Bush Justice Dept. has put folks in jail for far less, in regard to voting. Example, filling out a registration form fraudulently and never even voting at all. And then there's the Pakistani national who lived in the U.S. for 10 years, was given a stack of papers at the DMV, one of them a registration form which he filled out with all of the others. He was deported to Pakistan, separated from his American wife and child, all for following the directions of an official. He never even voted. Your excuses for the criminal Coulter are shameful. We are all embarrassed to share the same nation with you.

COMMENT #5 [Permalink]

... don myers said on 12/8/2007 @ 12:36 am PT...





Don't compare a decision by a jury where all members must agree with a decision by a board of elections - the slap in the face to our judicial system isn't necessary. I don't like anything about Coulter but I choose not to pay any attention to anything that she does. She has no credibility but continues to say and do anything that puts her name in the spotlight. Don't play the game by her rules.

COMMENT #6 [Permalink]

... jamie said on 12/8/2007 @ 6:26 am PT...





Ann Coulter is an entertainer. , She sells books and newspapers. i dont like her politics , I think she is pretty funny , This issue is dumb. next please!

COMMENT #7 [Permalink]

... cars said on 12/8/2007 @ 7:14 am PT...





Dang... this blog reads like a parody, but it's not, is it? Next, you'll be hyperventilating over the base, disgusting and outrageous criminal Bill O'Reilly for flagrantly getting a speeding ticket and thwarting the law by actually arriving in court and contesting it, then paying a small fine. The villain! Obsessing over small crap like this just makes you people look even more foolish, petty, and vindictive than we already thought you were. Meanwhile, your party has no moral qualms about bribing homeless people to vote, bussing in activists to vote in districts they do not live in but are known for lax rules, slashing the tires of buses meant for elderly citizens who are going to vote the wrong way, and even filling the voting rolls with stacks of dead people (all activities on record and sometimes on video, so don't bother trying to filibuster reality). {ED NOTE: The above graf is pure disinformation. While normally such disinfo might merit deletion of the entire comment, with notice of cause, we don't know whether or not "cars" knows this to be disinfo, or is just extraordinarily uninformed/gullible. So we'll leave it posted, along with this note of warning, so others don't fall prey to such unsubstantiated claims. Along with our note as to what a pity it is that folks like "cars" have such an embarrassingly, transparent and subjective sense of the difference between right and wrong.} A real newspaper puts it quite plainly: "The Florida Elections Commission has concluded no probable cause exists to charge the conservative columnist and author with violating state election laws." --in *addition* to the fact that the statute of limitations had run out. A full account of the incident doesn't show Coulter wrestling some poor poll worker to the ground, as is intimated in this blog. "Coulter had initially gone into the Bethesda polling place to vote. Poll worker Jim Whited advised her to fill out a change of address form, saying the address listed on the computer fell within the boundaries of the St. Edward precinct. Instead, Coulter asked where she would vote under the address listed in the computer. Whited told her St. Edward's and she left. "Although [Coulter] should have followed the directions of poll worker Jim Whited when she attempted to vote in precinct 1198, there is no evidence that she willfully violated [Florida election laws] when she voted in precinct 1196," the order signed by [FEC General Counsel Charles] Finkel states." Like it or not, this is entirely consistent with the behavior of most people if they found themselves in a similar situation, and doesn't really suggest that Coulter was intentionally defrauding the system. Why don't you just stick to making fun of her looking manly? As pathetic and girly as these cowardly attacks are, she probably *is* more manly than you are.

COMMENT #8 [Permalink]

... Kris Kemp said on 12/8/2007 @ 7:23 am PT...





Great post. Keep waking people up to what's going on. Visit:

www.rense.com

COMMENT #9 [Permalink]

... George Stuart said on 12/8/2007 @ 8:00 am PT...





What happens in FL, stays in FL. Forget Ann Coulter; forget the voting laws;--- forget FL---(unless you are a Republican).

COMMENT #10 [Permalink]

... Dan said on 12/8/2007 @ 8:05 am PT...





Cars, Ricky, Jamie, et al.... She is a lawyer. An officer of the court. She fraudulently filed false documentation. I aint sayin throw the bitch in court. I'm just sayin, hold her to an appropriate standard of conduct. The false documents are readily available in the public record. As is Florida election law. And a basic examination of both shows the violation. This bitch, who has advocated assassination of the poor and democrats (in the name of entertainment), DOESN'T EVEN HAVE THE BASIC DECENCY TO SAY...oops, I'm sorry. No, assholes. NO. NO NO NO NO NO. This bitch does NOT GET A FREE RIDE...and SCREW YOU FOR EVEN THINKING SHE SHOULD.

COMMENT #11 [Permalink]

... BOB YOUNG said on 12/8/2007 @ 8:27 am PT...





#3 You are of no help at all! Only an idiot has anything to learn from reading a book by another idiot. #6 Ann is nothing more than a manure spreader. She starts out each of her tirades using 100% USDA certified pure BS. She then packs more 100% USDA certified pure BS around that and spreads the results everywhere she goes. If you love S#!t on your face you should love Ann Coulter. Otherwise Ann should never impress you one iota!

COMMENT #12 [Permalink]

... Mark A. Adams JD/MBA said on 12/8/2007 @ 8:52 am PT...





I'm not surprised that the Florida Election Commission failed to find Coulter at fault. They never find against a Republicon AKA RINO (Republican In Name Only – one who is actually for big, intrusive, and expensive government while claiming not to be). Also, I'm not surprised that the local police didn't press charges. However, the standard operating procedure is for the police department to refer all complaints to the local State Attorney who then decides whether or not to pursue them. Did the police fail to follow procedure in this case? Of course, if the police had forwarded the complaint to the local State Attorney, Barry Krischer, the responsibility for the failure to prosecute would have fallen directly on him. It may have hurt his chances of re-election. Maybe it still will. After all, many are calling on the people to throw the incumbents out. See, an excerpt from Lee Iacocca’s new book, “Where Have All the Leaders Gone” at http://www.snopes.com/po...tics/soapbox/iacocca.asp It has been working, too. For example, almost a quarter of the members of Pennsylvania’s legislature were thrown out of office in 2006. However, that was not newsworthy according to the big corporate media. If you want to know more about that see, http://www.pacleansweep.com/legal.html Ron Paul supporters are tired of RINO’s throwing elections and trashing our Constitutional rights and our economy. They are working on doing the same thing this year. For information on this movement to take back our country from the RINO Neo-cons, see http://www.paulcongress.com/ I hope that members of the Democratic Party will take action to expose the failures of the leaders of their party to represent the people, and remove the DINOs (Democrats In Name Only – one who is really for undermining worker rights and shipping jobs overseas) from leadership positions in their party. As Noam Chomsky and many others who are paying attention have been saying for years, the claim that we have two parties is only an illusion as both parties act in the interests of big business, the oil companies, the defense industry, the prison industry, etc. Far too many of our leaders are in their pockets, so like Lee Iacocca and many others are saying, “Throw the bums out!” Take action, and do it now before it’s too late! If you still have any questions, see Naomi Wolf on The End of America

http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/177.html Salt Lake City Mayor Rocky Anderson Calls for Action

http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/28179 Mark Adams speaks at the FCC Hearing in Tampa

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAni0WoI7LI Bill Faulkner and Mark Adams speak at the Voting System Reform Rally in Tallahassee, Florida on March 21, 2007

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrNxSzw_qvI John Russell and Mark Adams speak at the St. Petersburg peace rally on March 17, 2007 on why we are still at war when the vast majority of Americans are against it and what you can do about it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZG5krR3jbhs Mark Adams on Op Ed News about How to Take Action on Holt and Fix Our Elections

http://www.opednews.com/...how_to_take_action_o.htm Links to speech titled "No Justice, No Peace" given by Mark A. Adams, Esquire JD/MBA at the National Judicial Reform Conference at Rice University in Houston, Texas on August 11, 2007.

Higher Quality Video http://video.google.com/...ocid=5135583133302349969

Lower Quality Video http://video.google.com/...cid=-5274592268158533722 The Brad Blog report on Republicans caught rigging elections in Florida and my comment on that article.

https://bradblog.com/?p=5407

COMMENT #13 [Permalink]

... greggp said on 12/8/2007 @ 9:13 am PT...





CARS # 7 said

Obsessing over small crap like this just makes you people look even more foolish, petty, and vindictive than we already thought you were. Did you support the Clinton impeachment?

COMMENT #14 [Permalink]

... Perry Logan said on 12/8/2007 @ 9:36 am PT...





Shucks. I was hoping she'd get the chair.

COMMENT #15 [Permalink]

... TJSwift said on 12/8/2007 @ 10:00 am PT...





#7 nailed it. " real newspaper puts it quite plainly: "The Florida Elections Commission has concluded no probable cause exists to charge the conservative columnist and author with violating state election laws." --in *addition* to the fact that the statute of limitations had run out." All of you mouth-breathing, moonbat lawyers can spew as much foam as you want in your little echo chamber, but the fact remains that Coulter was investigated by the proper authority and exonerated...end of story. Next non-issue please..

COMMENT #16 [Permalink]

... pv said on 12/8/2007 @ 10:05 am PT...





I wonder if this will set a precedent for future felons who try to vote illegally. Only if they're from the Republican party, I'll bet. Why isn't the right up in arms about this? Can you imagine if a Democrat, or worse, a MEXICAN, tried to pull this scam like Ann the Man? They'd be swiftboated, waterboarded and flown off to lala land. F'ing Hypocrites. But what can you expect from the Redneck Riviera known as Florida?

COMMENT #17 [Permalink]

... kimo said on 12/8/2007 @ 10:14 am PT...





I knew HE would get away with it. He had the balls to do it. He has the support of 26% of this country.

COMMENT #18 [Permalink]

... Dan said on 12/8/2007 @ 10:19 am PT...





#14.. I read your blog a bit, Mr Swift. Why are you so intent on insulting anyone you disagree with? Why do you ridicule the will of a democratic peoples? Australia's public elected someone else to be Prime Minister...he's the choice of the people of Australia. The fact that you insist on name calling and labeling others is more of a testament to your own weak mind than ANY of the hate and disinformation you actually put in type. I'm not surprised that you would come to the defense of Ms Coulter. Both you and she appear of the same ilk. Very small minded and intolerant. Her insults are not humorous. Nor are they Christian. And neither are yours. Sadly, you are far to representative of the powers that be in this once proud USofA. (Which truly do not mirror the actual will of the people.) Your day of atonement for your sins of hatred are coming. Very very soon.

COMMENT #19 [Permalink]

... LindyLou said on 12/8/2007 @ 10:46 am PT...





To Ricky, Cars, and all the other apologists for Ms, Coulter. Doesn't it bother you just a little that this woman who has a law degree, and who never hesitates to call anyone else ugly names, retarded among them, and who constantly tells others how to think "intelligently" like she does--doesn't it bother you just a little that this paragon of all intelligent thought can't figure out where to legally vote? And you think I should waste my time reading a book by this idiot? Either she's really, really dumb or else she's a dirty liar. Or she finds a lot of really dumb people do do her dirty lies for her.

COMMENT #20 [Permalink]

... DerekLarsson said on 12/8/2007 @ 11:09 am PT...





Is Ann Coulter a CIA operative?Does anyone know? It doesn't really make any sense why neither the police, the election commission, the sheriff, etc. all would just lay down and refuse to enforce the documented election laws unless other pressures are involved here. If you or I tried to do this, we would've been charged and faced sentencing. And, by the way, the act of not prosecuting someone on a mere technicality like "statute of limitations" is not the same thing as exhonoration or innocence. It is totally absurd that a "statute of limitations" could even apply to begin with. It has only been 1 friggin year since the 2006 election. Coulter remains a criminal.And the question remains why is she getting special treatment?

COMMENT #21 [Permalink]

... Savantster said on 12/8/2007 @ 12:12 pm PT...





Man, I love it when the right-wing psychos come out and piss their hypocrisy all over the left-leaning blogs. So far, the message has been in collusion with Rick{y} with "She just put a different address down. Big freaking deal." .. Yet, when it comes time for the elections, these SAME morons are SCREAMING shit like "voter fraud! OMG voter fraud! they are trying to rig the election by having those dirty Dems vote in a Repuke district to sway the vote!!!! OMG OMG OMG!! KILL THEM ALL!!!"... So, let's be clear as to exactly what it is that these right-wing trolls are espousing. "It's OK for one of our right-wing psychos to illegally vote, even after being corrected. It's also OK for one of our right-wing nutjobs to put false information on her Driver's License.. but if ANY of you DIRTY LIBERALS do anything like that, you need to be executed (for being.. stupid, uh.. ugly.. uh.. dirty.. uh.. Murika haters.. uh)". So long as we're crystal on the double standard, guys.

COMMENT #22 [Permalink]

... Margaret said on 12/8/2007 @ 2:01 pm PT...





I've never commented on this blog before though I read from time to time. What surprises me most about these comments is the transparent hypocrisy that is on display from the Coulter sycophants. Don't sweat the small stuff,eh? Funny that you were all about impeaching a president over a blow job, (not a crime), but want to badmouth people for attempting to hold Coulter responsible for committing a felony and for then lying about it, (ostensibly the same reason you cheerled for Clinton's impeachment) but then that's all you people are about isn't it? A "compromise" is when Bush gets his way, science is what the right wing says it is through the lens of religious fear mongering and intolerence and voter fraud is only a crime if someone *gasp* did it in order to vote for a Democrat or that they are of a demographic that makes people believe that they may vote Democratic. How do you look at yourselves in the mirror without laughing?

COMMENT #23 [Permalink]

... Big Dan said on 12/8/2007 @ 2:54 pm PT...





The Ann Coulter apologists above are saying that it's "OK" to break the law! Can you believe it? I didn't know it's "OK" to break the law! Thanks for letting me know that! I thought you hicks say, for the illegal immigration issue, "Illegal is Illegal", don't you? Guess "illegal ISN'T illegel"...only if a Republican does it! That's called "hypocrisy", btw...

COMMENT #24 [Permalink]

... jgmurphy said on 12/8/2007 @ 2:56 pm PT...





The hypocrisy of the Right is amazing. These are the same folks who shriek "voter fraud!" at anyone with a Latino-sounding last name and whine for a recall of EVRY---I said EVERY--Congressional race on the West Coast (remember how they tortured poor Loretta Sanchez when she beat rightwing moonbat Bob Dornan?). But here we have a documented case of voter fraud by a rightwing Conservative and their take is "yawn, no big deal."

COMMENT #25 [Permalink]

... Gaspar said on 12/8/2007 @ 3:12 pm PT...





News to you?? She's a NAZI. They only ever take, they never ever pay. She is a FRAUD of a human, much less fraud as a woman, pleeeease! Just like with all Nazis, karma eventually triumphs. You cannot beat the law of nature forever.

COMMENT #26 [Permalink]

... Savantster said on 12/8/2007 @ 3:21 pm PT...





"How do you look at yourselves in the mirror without laughing?" I'm guessing most don't have mirrors.. they get tired of all the crying, puking, and smashing in anger that they have to see their faces after [insert some childhood trauma here] happened to them, and they are disgusted with themselves. Well, then the closet cases who want to come out but can't seem to drum up the balls (no pun intended).. Laughing implies a sense of humor, and the only time I see people on the right-wing laughing is when someone is suffering. That should be the first clue that their wiring is TOTALLY screwed up.

COMMENT #27 [Permalink]

... TJSwift said on 12/8/2007 @ 4:23 pm PT...





Listen closely children. No one, certainly not I, is suggesting that Anne Coulter should "get away" with anything. The point here is that she was investigated by the proper authorities and found innocent. That's the way it works in America kids, sometimes the facts just do not meet the definitions we wish to ascribe them. #18 Dan: If you thought I was harsh with Rudd (a mere socialist), be sure to tune into what I have to say to Hugo Chavez & his merry band of Communist artillary goalies.

COMMENT #28 [Permalink]

... Mark A. Adams JD/MBA said on 12/8/2007 @ 4:51 pm PT...





Hello, please see my comment above. It's # 12. The proper authorities sat on everything until the statute of limitations ran, and they did so in a way in which it would help the State Attorney avoid accountability to the voters. Of course, the actions involved in arranging the delay may give rise to other criminal charges, but of course, those would also probably be ignored. Unfortunately, the rule of law means nothing to our current leaders and their ignorant apologists.

COMMENT #29 [Permalink]

... Dr Eric Durand said on 12/8/2007 @ 9:32 pm PT...





Brad Blog: In regard to your Ann Coulter Story, you provide a "perfect case" for why the New Scientific Government Training Programs (which reprovably-would've prevented Every Major Disaster, since Reagan left office in 1988-89---including the $8 Trillion-plus Deficit) need to be implemented, as soon as possible. Noone on our budget (paid to do a job) knows what their job is. While many would think that your Ann Coulter Story is a wild exaggeration of a slight "faux paux" for someone with as hectic a schedule as her's, as Americans, you have the right to the Representative Government you pay for. If you're willing to risk it (as if you're wrong, you owe money, minimally), it's your representative government's JOB to try it. It's why you've paid taxes to build and staff a government; and it's criminal for them to do otherwise.....which is the real story, even if this is a minor infraction, as regards Ann Coulter, the Major Infraction is your representative government being obstructed. Moreover, as such "little crimes" are what BIG CRIMES are made of and how socio-economic-descent into war occurs, officially allege wrongdoing to your Grand Jury, if your allegations are correct. If what you've related is accurate, in fact, you should also allege that your Elections Commission is OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE (and principal to such crimes). As it's a Scientificly-undeniable fact (as my Scientific Entirety of the Supreme Law of the Land REPROVES) that The Elections Commission is engaged in Misprision, Concealment, Obstruction of Justice, Malfeasance, and Principalship (before and after the fact) to fail to present or prevent the presentment of such allegations of wrongdoing to the Grand Jury, these are crimes you should include in your Report/Petition to them. As well, if Ms. Coulter falsely-registered to vote, the time-limit for a Statute of Limitations to apply would begin at the time she corrected the error and cease to be applicable at the time the official allegation of wrongdoing was made (not at the time they got around to the case). This is all REPROVABLE, UNDEFEATABLE, FACT AND LAW (any/all evidence to the contrary is wrong, illegal, fraudulent), so if these provisions apply, get 'em. Of course, you should realize that Ms. Coulter may have done you and the rest of Americans (and Floridians) a Massive Favor, via her slight miscalculation---by uncovering an officeholder (or officeholders) who not only negligently didn't know the job, but, were not of a mind to rightly perform it (an organized, criminal, effort that jeopardizes the very Office of the President, itself). Moreover, if Ms. Coulter's infraction wasn't corrected (being known and officially reported, to someone-anyway), how many more, similar infractions exist that were not reported and are not known? Do yourself (and the World) a favor, if you're of a mind to be an Investigator of Government wrongdoing and corruption, include the Scientific Government Training Programs in Every Allegation of Wrongdoing that you find and make (as the Negligent reason that such crimes have occurred), and we'll get rid of these criminals on our budget and get competent, Equal Protection of the Law, supporters and defenders in our government(and it's opponents out). Like Dr. Einstein's disproof of Faraday's assertions, subatomicly, everything else was either fraud or counterfeit (crime and debt producing or expanding, either way). So too it is with these New Scientific Government Training Programs, only moreoso, there are no substitutes-----all others (frauds or counterfeits, as they MUST be) are only a means of obtaining higher offices to which those doing so reprovably-do not qualify (as those on the Federal Elections Commission and/or their appointers have, obviously done---if your assertions are accurate). You should realize, that the phenomena you relate of (large numbers on your budget, paid via your taxes) having knowledge of official allegations of wrongdoing and "doing nothing"(no Grand Jury Presentments, etc.), if true, would be evidence of the International Crime of "Taxation Without Representation", which the Founding Fathers historically-battled against (I'm sure you've heard the phrase, even if you didn't know what it looked like, up close and personal)----which would bring it under the 1950 International Crime Act (The Anti Communist Act it's called) and make you qualify for the new $500,000 Reward of 18USC3071 (I think it is), if you can prove it----even if Ms. Coulter's infraction is only a "minor" piece in the Big Picture (she may not even realize it;and may turn "state's evidence", upon learning of the facts and realizing how and why they were attempting to "play" her, you should ask her). While this type of activity is, obviously, how international crime has long worked to invade and dysfunction representative government, it's longetivity doesn't make it's existence or danger any less certain. Reserving Contractual Construction for Myself, Always: Dr. Eric Durand, Ph.D.........

{Ed Note: This turned into something a little too much like advertizing. Please don't do that. --99}

COMMENT #30 [Permalink]

... Dr Eric Durand said on 12/8/2007 @ 9:45 pm PT...





DON'T FORGET "YOUR" $500,000 REWARD...

{SHE HASN'T GOTTEN AWAY, LEST YOU LET HER GO}

COMMENT #31 [Permalink]

... JUDGE OF JUDGES said on 12/8/2007 @ 10:19 pm PT...





Ya know Some folks just ain't too swift . . .

COMMENT #32 [Permalink]

... JUDGE OF JUDGES said on 12/8/2007 @ 10:31 pm PT...





I didn't know they were allowing internet privileges at Creedmore again . . . #29 - Are the pages nice and soft ?

COMMENT #33 [Permalink]

... Dredd said on 12/9/2007 @ 5:19 am PT...





The bushie doctrine is bushies walk, bushies get pardoned for grave felonies, and all others don't. The law in the mind of a bushie is a whip to use on non-bushies. Now the preznit blush has applied the law of the bushies to the housing crisis which Bob Ney (R-Prison) started with his little judge Roy L. Bean law:

Only a fraction of the homeowners who face huge jumps in their mortgage payments appear likely to be helped by the plan, negotiated by the Bush administration, to freeze the low introductory rates on their subprime loans for five years. (Rate Freeze). All you Annie "Get Your Gun" Gannon-Guckert fans need to get in line and take your pablum. Its beddie bye time bushies. The rest of us are cleaning up your mess ... for one generation at least.

COMMENT #34 [Permalink]

... cars said on 12/9/2007 @ 8:36 am PT...





"unsubstantiated claims" Heh, touched a nerve, didn't I? The slashing of van tires was in the freaking newspaper, a well-publicized incident, and the culprits went to court. The Democrats at fault were excused and explained away--unless we catch Ted Kennedy himself committing these misdeeds, it somehow doesn't count. And even then, their would be excuses. We've seen the videos of Dems giving cigs to the homeless. The incident, despite the damning evidence, is simply denied and ignored. We could expand this to other dubious Democratic party election activities, like rifling through opposition trash. But every factual misdeed committed by the Democratic party is conveniently explained away as "right wing noise". But no matter how shrilly you scream "disinformation", you simply can't run away from the modern Democratic party record of voter fraud. Despite the terrified boldface warning above, don't take my word for it, anyway. But also don't take the word of these silly partisans screaming "nazi" and "manure spreader" because they are emotionally incapable of dealing with dissenting speech in a free society. Go look up the record of voter fraud, yourself. Do some real research, instead of following contrived sets of links. Neither major US party is completely innocent, yet Republicans are amateurs compared to the depth and breadth of Democrat fraud. {ED NOTE: And yet, in five years of the BUSH Justice Department trying to prosecute every little thing that even smelled like "voter fraud", even going so far as to fire REPUBLICAN US Attorneys for not prosecuting false cases of it, they were only able to find "Scant evidence of Voter Fraud". Go figure. Guess those cheatin' Dems are now running the Bush DoJ too. Wicked conspiracy, that. You have been warned about disinfo, Cars. Knock it off, or you're gone. --- BF}

COMMENT #35 [Permalink]

... Off the Grid said on 12/9/2007 @ 9:22 am PT...





Holy shit circus batman! ps-brad, focus on the felons in the White House, PLEASE.

pps-cars are coffins

COMMENT #36 [Permalink]

... TJSwift said on 12/9/2007 @ 9:29 am PT...





#28 "The proper authorities sat on everything until the statute of limitations ran, and they did so in a way in which it would help the State Attorney avoid accountability to the voters." Ahh, of course. The Vast, Rightwing Consipracy...and GWB was flying those planes into WTC I&II using a playstation II console modified for the purpose by Haliburton's Mad Scientist division, right?.....pfft. Fine, then blame the government. Still doesn't change the fact that Coulter stood under an investigation and was exonerated. Tough taffy for you, I know, but it's those dang facts always in the way of a really good delusion.

COMMENT #37 [Permalink]

... Agent 99 said on 12/9/2007 @ 11:15 am PT...





Neither major US party is completely innocent... Yuh, and at least the Republicans are right up front in your face about it... but the Democrats are hopelessly inept when it comes to brainwashing and, even more effective, paying people to clog the "tubes" with their perfidious talking points. So if you're doing it for free, you should really look into the going rate at the shill mills. The extra cash will come in handy at the pump.

COMMENT #38 [Permalink]

... JUDGE OF JUDGES said on 12/9/2007 @ 12:17 pm PT...





Dem ineptness at propaganda cums from their cognitive dissonance to play with da truth. Now a few words from our sponsor . . . 13 sec.

COMMENT #39 [Permalink]

... Brad Friedman said on 12/10/2007 @ 12:09 am PT...





TJSwift #36 incorrectly said: Fine, then blame the government. Still doesn't change the fact that Coulter stood under an investigation and was exonerated. First time dealing with legal issues, Swifties? No, she was not exonerated, and no she did not "stand under and investigation". Unless you include the investigation by the Palm Beach Sheriff who dismissed the case after inappropriate and illegal interference by the FBI. Learn the facts, son, and then get back to us. Though I suspect facts make little difference to folks like yourself who don't give a shit about the rule of law. I know, but it's those dang facts always in the way of a really good delusion. Be careful of that petard, slick. It's easy to hoist ones self right down on it.

COMMENT #40 [Permalink]

... troy k said on 12/10/2007 @ 1:16 pm PT...





ann coulter is a man so of course he has the balls to get away with it anyone dont think hes a man check out that adams apple if it has a adams apple it has grapes and a bannana also coulter is a freak and a right wing wack job forget about the idiot

COMMENT #41 [Permalink]

... w.c. said on 12/10/2007 @ 2:03 pm PT...





Did anyone actually ask Ann why she put down the wrong address? There may be a logical and/or even legal reason for doing so. 1. Perhaps she was living where she stated even though she also had another address. For example, people that just moved in with their boyfriend/girlfriend often keep their own apartment in case things don't work out. That way they could always return. Where you actually live is a matter of perspective. You may actually physically live in one place but still have your old address on all legal documents for awhile. 2. Perhaps she put down a different address to help avoid releaving her true home address because she's constantly being harassed by crazy people like you? Maybe someone should try asking her instead of hating on her because you don't like her politics. What a bunch of hate mongers! This is quite an example of the kettle calling the pot black!

COMMENT #42 [Permalink]

... BOB YOUNG said on 12/10/2007 @ 3:26 pm PT...





#41 "This is quite an example of the kettle calling the pot black!" That sums up your post very well. I sure didn't think you would spot that in the end as totally lost as you were along the way.

COMMENT #43 [Permalink]

... TJSwift said on 12/10/2007 @ 5:22 pm PT...





"No, she was not exonerated, and no she did not "stand under and investigation". Unless you include the investigation by the Palm Beach Sheriff who dismissed the case after inappropriate and illegal interference by the FBI." So, in this echo chamber my definition of "investigation" has to take your black helicopter delusion into consideration...whooooowee. Well it's your site sport, whatever makes the propeller on your tinfoil hat spin is fine with me. So, are are any of you law talking moonbats going to file a complaint against the FBI for inappropriately and illegally interfering with this capital case? Heh.

COMMENT #44 [Permalink]

... Brad Friedman said on 12/10/2007 @ 11:39 pm PT...





W.C. asked: Did anyone actually ask Ann why she put down the wrong address? Yes. And if you bother to go back and read the series of articles at http://www.Bradblog.com/CoulterFraud you'll hear her many different answers (both from her own mouth, and those of her attorneys, along with the admission that she lied about it all) There may be a logical and/or even legal reason for doing so. There isn't. The closest she came to "logical" is her unevidenced claim that she has dangerous "stalkers". That doesn't hold up much given that the address she gave was that of her real estate agent who had no idea Coulter was giving out her address. Very thoughtful if she felt herself in danger to give the address of someone else without telling them. 1. Perhaps she was living where she stated even though she also had another address. She wasn't. 2. Perhaps she put down a different address to help avoid releaving her true home address because she's constantly being harassed by crazy people like you? See above. Maybe someone should try asking her instead of hating on her because you don't like her politics. We did. She refused to reply on order of her attorney. Perhaps you should try asking before "hating on us" because you don't like our politics. What a bunch of hate mongers! This is quite an example of the kettle calling the pot black! Couldn't have put it better myself. Keep up the bad work.

COMMENT #45 [Permalink]

... Brad Friedman said on 12/10/2007 @ 11:44 pm PT...





TJSwift continued his clueless streak my writing: So, in this echo chamber my definition of "investigation" has to take your black helicopter delusion into consideration...whooooowee. Yes, unless you consider the FBI to be black helicopter headquarters. It was they who announced an internal investigation into the inappropriate interference in the local investigation into Coulter's voter fraud. Facts. You may wish to peruse them before making yourself look even more like a dope in your next silly posting. So, are are any of you law talking moonbats going to file a complaint against the FBI for inappropriately and illegally interfering with this capital case? As mentioned, it's already under investigation. Give the FBI a call to check your facts. Or keep embarrassing yourself. Up to you. Best of luck!

COMMENT #46 [Permalink]

... cars said on 12/11/2007 @ 3:43 pm PT...





Heh! Is this Brad character always so touchy? My post, at the very least, could be easily dismissed as "just one dope's opinion" by any rational, reasonable person who believes they have a strong argument on their own side. Yet every time I come back I find frantic, terrified boldface tacked onto my own comments-- as opposed to simply responding to me, as most bloggers do when debating commenters in their blogs. Sorry, Brad, but your rage is impotent... I'm just passing by, and don't much care if I ever post here again. Ban away, censor discomforting dissent, all those modern liberal anti-speech techniques we've come to know and love. Your argument-fu remains weak and unconvincing, and if thinking people examine the arguments you make, pick apart how much of it is simply based on your ongoing prejudices, they will find the obvious holes, mislogic, and non sequiturs. Citing current investigation by an administration already rapped for being divisive, for instance, is obviously irrelevant. Unless, of course, you're insane and think the Bush administration is trying really really hard to "get" Democrats. But, of course, you probably do.

COMMENT #47 [Permalink]

... Agent 99 said on 12/11/2007 @ 3:53 pm PT...





Dunno, Brad. He might be on drugs. Can't seem even to make his buzzwords fit circumstances, let alone post about actual facts or honest opinion.... I don't think he has the ability to interact as a sentient being.

COMMENT #48 [Permalink]

... Aion said on 12/12/2007 @ 12:12 am PT...





So if I live in a red state where my vote will almost certainly not tip the scale, according to 'Ricky' above, I should be able to waltz across my own border to some other state where my vote might actually make a difference? Or better still, how about people from heavily blue areas deciding to take buses to neighboring red states to do the same? What Coultergeist did was illegal. And it is her celebrity status mixed with the fact that she is NOT a dem that got her off the hook. Justice is NOT blind.

COMMENT #49 [Permalink]

... Steve said on 12/16/2007 @ 12:31 am PT...





Wow, liberals really chase themselves in tails. Hey, that Borchers stalker guy hasn't been around much lately, I wonder maybe Michelle Malkin may actually give him the attention Coulter didn't. "Last month, following several incidents, including a hand-delivered obscene greeting card placed in her home mailbox, Coulter's identifying information was removed from Palm Beach County voter and appraiser records under a state law that exempts harassment or stalking victims from public records law." Geez, which websites were responsible for publishing her address, obsessing about her phone numbers, memorizing her dress size, and documenting her bathroom routine just because she voted one block out of her precinct? She deserved amnesty from the same rules that apply to overweight liberal women that aren't stalked by Republicans - like Rosie O'Donnell. If she would have gotten that exception years ago, then none of this would have been an issue. Save that freeze-frame you have of her home address. It's not accessible to the public anymore, as it should have not been years ago when she requested so.

COMMENT #50 [Permalink]

... sadisticon said on 12/24/2007 @ 9:39 am PT...





It's a crime, she knew it was a crime.

She walks; today.

Don't try to cover for her, she doesn't pay your rent.

She is still a phony.

COMMENT #51 [Permalink]

... ohboy said on 1/21/2008 @ 3:59 pm PT...

