He added, “We will work with the parties in the weeks ahead to ensure that the parties honor and memorialize these commitments.”

The Weinstein Company had said on Sunday that it would file for bankruptcy after the collapse of talks with Ms. Contreras-Sweet’s group, which includes the billionaire investor Ron Burkle. The Weinstein Company’s board said at the time that promised interim funding from the group had not materialized, leaving bankruptcy as the only option.

But on Thursday, Mr. Schneiderman got the sale back on track by holding a meeting in his offices with Mr. Burkle and Ms. Contreras-Sweet and members of the Weinstein Company’s board, including Bob Weinstein and Lance Maerov, an executive at the advertising giant WPP Group. Mr. Burkle, who has a long history with the Weinstein Company, stepping in to help Harvey Weinstein finance films like “Our Idiot Brother” in 2011, asked for the meeting.

Mr. Schneiderman sued the company and the Weinstein brothers on Feb. 11, alleging that they violated state and city laws barring gender discrimination, sexual harassment and coercion. A deal for the company had been expected to be formalized on Feb. 12, but the lawsuit brought sale talks to a halt.

Amy Spitalnick, the press secretary for Mr. Schneiderman, said on Feb. 11 that his office had recently reached out to representatives of Ms. Contreras-Sweet to emphasize the importance of adequately compensating victims, protecting employees and not rewarding those who enabled or perpetuated Mr. Weinstein’s misconduct.

“We were surprised to learn they were not serious about discussing any of those issues or even sharing the most basic information about how they planned to address them,” Ms. Spitalnick said. Mr. Schneiderman said again in a Feb. 12 news conference “there was no victim compensation fund.”

Ms. Contreras-Sweet was stunned by Mr. Schneiderman’s public remarks, according to one person briefed on the matter, believing that he was overlooking money for victims that had been built into her proposal.