Maine Gov. Paul LePage is objecting to a break the U.S. Department of Agriculture under the Obama administration gave a halal market that made fraudulent food stamp transactions.

But federal officials told LifeZette the decision is final.

“If you have rules, you need to follow the rules. The problem with the previous administration is they were very, very weak on fraud.”

More from LifeZette TV

MORE NEWS: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg dead

The case involves Sindbad Market in Portland. According to the Agriculture Department’s Office of Inspector General, the market made four fraudulent transactions with three ineligible customers. Because the owner was personally involved in one of the transactions, that ordinarily would trigger a one-year suspension of the ability to accept food stamps, formally known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

But an attorney for Sindbad Market asked for and received an exemption in September on grounds that suspension would cause a hardship for Muslim food stamp recipients, who rely on the market for its preparation of halal meat, in accordance with Islamic law. The federal government agreed to impose a $33,000 fine instead.

Do you agree that protesting is acceptable, but rioting is not? Yes No Email Address (required) By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from LifeZette and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement Results Vote

“In consideration of the attorney’s response and our analysis of other SNAP retailers in the area, it was our determination that disqualification of Sindibad [sic] Market LLC would cause a hardship for SNAP households due to no comparable stores within a one mile radius,” a federal document states.

[lz_table title=”Food Stamp Fraud” source=”Department of Agriculture”]Years,Amount,Ptg. of benefits

1993,$811M,3.8%

1996-1998,$660M,3.5%

1999-2002,$393M,2.5%

2002-2005,$241M,1%

2006-2008,$330M,1%

2009-2011,$858M,1.3%

[/lz_table]

LePage, who has made rooting out social services fraud a central feature of his administration, criticized leniency for the rule-breaker.

“I don’t agree with the last administration,” LePage told LifeZette. “I think they should have been suspended. If you have rules, you need to follow the rules. The problem with the previous administration is they were very, very weak on fraud. In fact, they were so weak, it was an incentive to get into fraud.”

MORE NEWS: ‘The View’ Derails After Kim Klacik Calls Out Joy Behar For ‘Parading In Blackface’

Officials from the Agriculture Department point out that fraud rates for food stamps are near all-time lows. The most recent report, in 2013, indicated that fraud accounted for 1.3 percent of food stamp benefits from 2009 to 2011. That was up slightly from the 1 percent rate between 2002 and 2008, but below the 3.8 percent mark in 1993. At the same time, fraud accounted for $858 million during the most recent time frame, a 20-year high. The report attributed that to a big increase in the number of people receiving food stamps and a resulting spike in the amount of money the government spends on the program.

In addition, from 2009 through 2011, 10.5 percent of stores engaged in fraud. That is close to the 20-year high of 11.7 percent in the 1996-1998 period. The report attributes that to the fact that small stores are more likely to engage in fraud.

Assistant State’s Attorney David Williams told the Chicago Tribune in August that food stamp trafficking was “fairly rampant” among corner stores in the city. The paper reported that more than 140 stores in Chicago and another 34 in suburban Cook County have been permanently disqualified since October 2014.

Sami Deffala, who manages a corner story in Chicago’s Englewood neighborhood, told the Tribune that customers ask every day to trade food stamps for cash.

“I have people young and old doing this, from an 18-year-old woman to a 67-year-old man,” he told the paper. “It’s a big problem.”

But if offending stores can make a case on religious grounds, they have a better chance at avoiding suspension. Sindbad Market’s lawyer submitted statements from 10 customers claiming they made many purchases for fresh halal meat products and other culture staples at the store. The market also submitted photographs and invoices.

Under Department of Agriculture regulations, federal officials consider whether there are comparable vendors within a mile radius of the store that has committed a violation. In this case, according to the documents, there is another medium grocery store within a mile of Sindbad. Makkah Halal Market, is a medium specialty grocery little more than a tenth of a mile away.

But investigators from the Agriculture Department determined that the store does not sell fresh halal meat, only frozen.

“It was felt the subject store’s disqualification would cause a hardship to SNAP households due to the absence of comparable stores offering fresh meat products (Halal) within one mile of the subject store,” the document states.

[lz_related_box id=”365096″]

LePage rejected that.

“I spoke to the people in the other market, and they said there shouldn’t be a difference,” he said.

Jalil Isa, a spokesman for the Department of Agriculture, said the federal government gives flexibility to states in managing the federally funded food stamp program.

“But as far as the penalties are concerned, this is something that very much falls in the purview of the federal jurisdiction,” he said.

Isa said the market already has paid the fine and that the decision is final.