londiste Looking at financial statements, this actually currently looks bleak for AMD. Numbers seem to be roughly the same across last few quarters but using the same first quarter of calendar year 2019. Trend for this should be upwards though, so that is a good thing.



AMD Data Center, Embedded and Semi-custom revenue (that includes both servers as well as consoles) is a little over 50% of what Computing and Graphics segment brings in.



For comparison, Nvidia gets 60% from Data Center (Teslas) and additional 25% from Professional Visualization (Quadro). This is revenue as percentage of Gaming segment revenue. Intel gets about 57% from Data Center (with downward trend). Again, revenue as percentage of Client Computing Group revenue.

Ah, I didn't catch the second to last reply, my bad. Nice catch, I have to work and I read tech news to warm up my mind for the day.Unfortunately 'Computing and Graphics' is a very blanket/general term. I believe I've seen unit count numbers in reports in the past, maybe through HardOCP (RIP and damn Intel for killing off a damn good source of news). The challenge is putting a dollar price on the total unless they have a report with that break down too?Obviously with the report you linked to they are slowly knocking down the debt and increasing their R&D costs. There isn't any way around it, they've got a ways to go. At the end of the day when I'm in a position to upgrade my GPU I'm going to buy the best I can with the money that I have which almost always is AMD. Liquid cooling is a must at this point though and I'd love to see upper-midrange and up to include at least some models. Plus I see way too many "high end" cards sporting part or even full aluminum heatsinks plus the fins point to the side instead of moving the heat out to the back of the case.The problem with market share is mindset. Unfortunately most people don't use their brains for critical thinking. In example if Nvidia has the fastest video card then a very disproportionate percent of the market will buy a $100 GPU from Nvidia with 40% less performance than AMD because they're reading benchmarks for $800+ cards. The Radeon VII card isn't bad from the benchmarks middling between the 2070 and 2080 and people act like it's some great disappointment. I think HBM2 has it's place though realistically once AMD has more of a budget to work with I'm sure we'll see GDDR6 and HBM2 high end cards come out at the same time. Plus people doing video editing think 16GB cards are a boon since they keep running out of GPU memory on other cards (and Nvidia's wacky RAM numbers just make my roll my eyes, 11GB? Seriously?). So many people act like it's disappointment, doom and gloom but I don't see them standing in David's shoes fighting against a Goliath. AMD is still securing their place in the market, the only difference now though is that they have more of a long term grip on things.