"The intent of the committee is to try to alleviate and clean up some of the things in our league that we've all agreed need to be addressed," Waibel said. "The frustrating part is when we feel it could've been prevented. In this particular situation, I feel the whistle should've been blown for a foul committed previous to the later foul. There's always two sides to it. For the actual suspension itself, it's one that we understand the committee's been making consistently."