Freddie tackles Stephen Fry for advocating the misuse of words:

Words have value in their ability to distinguish and to discriminate. And they are only ever damaged in one direction: they become more abstracted, more broad, less specific, less forceful, less memorable, less powerful, more middling, less individual. When people misuse "anticipate" to the point where it is identical to "expect," there's nothing to cheer for anyone. Why? Because where we once had two words for two concepts, we now have two words for the same concept-- and no word that means "anticipate". You and I are rapidly losing that wonderful word. In it's place is a vague shell. Irony is a fantastic concept, wonderfully precise. The word "ironic," at this point, is close to having no individual meaning whatsoever. When "ironic" can mean any kind of sort of strange, sort of funny happenstance, we no longer use that word to access a specific and incisive idea.

Orwell was right. There are some core underpinnings for Anglo-American democracy. One of them is the constant struggle to use plain English directly. As a language, its breadth and concreteness are its strengths. And yet we speak increasingly like Germans. 'Enhanced interrogation techniques" my ass. It really did sound better in the original German. In English, we say torture. Like Englishmen.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to letters@theatlantic.com.