As some of you are no doubt aware, the Russian intelligence agencies and military services, cyberwarfare division, have definitively been exposed by our government's intelligence services as the engine behind the greatest election theft in history, stealing the election from the rightful heiress to American people's choice for President, Hillary Clinton, and managing to install Donald Trump, Celebrity TV reality game show host and serial rapist, pedophile and bankruptcy practitioner extraordinaire in the Oval office. Or maybe they just installed his brand, TRUMP™.

What the Director of National Intelligence and the Intelligence Community Assessment, Russia’s Influence Campaign Targeting the 2016 US Presidential Election, issued by his office on January 6, 2017, could not tell us, in order not to expose "crucial technical data demonstrating Russian culpability," is truly disappointing.

Fortunately for you, I am in possession of undeniable evidence that the extent of Russia's influence on American elections and it's political process is wide and far-ranging. Russia's influence extends from the furthest reaches of the revolutionary left to the most radical conservative organizations, and from the wealthiest elites to the poorest people in our country. It has penetrated our society at all levels, from lobbyists to activists, and from from political party soirées to neighborhood backyard barbecue get-togethers. The Russian influence this year was simply astounding.

Using my special investigative tools, which go by the code name the "intertubes," I have investigated at length the most troubling breach of our national security since the early years of the Cold War, when Hollywood, the Army, politicians, government officials and bureaucrats, labor organizations and even ordinary Americans were indoctrinated as a secret Fifth column working for the Russians. Let's start with just a few of my most explosive revelations, shall we? Individuals and groups you would never expect to have a hand in advancing the Russian agenda to suborn our freedom and to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.



The Koch Brothers

Yes, the two brothers, Charles and David Koch, arch-conservatives who secretly and not so secretly fund and seek to pass laws favorable to Big Business and anti-labor, operate one of the largest and most successful Russian front operations in America. You want proof? Just look at who was behind all those voter suppression efforts that funded the election of politicians who then passed model laws designed by Koch funded entities that were designed hurt the chances of Hillary Clinton and the Democrats by making it harder for minorities, poor people and young people to vote. Needless to say, these voter suppression efforts cost Hillary dearly in critical states she needed to win an electoral victory.

What makes this all the worse is that behind the veneer of anti-communist and anti-Russian rhetoric, the Koch family has been a sleeper cell for Russian interests for nearly a century!

What few realize is that the secretive oil billionaires of the Koch family, the main supporters of the right-wing groups that orchestrated the Tea Party movement, would not have the means to bankroll their favorite causes had it not been for the pile of money the family made working for the Bolsheviks in the late 1920s and early 1930s, building refineries, training Communist engineers and laying down the foundation of Soviet oil infrastructure. [...] In 1929, after hosting a delegation of Soviet planners in Wichita, Kansas, Winkler and Koch signed a $5 million contract to build 15 refineries in the Soviet Union. According to Oil of Russia, a Russian oil industry trade magazine, the deal made Winkler–Koch into Comrade Stalin’s Number One refinery builder. It provided equipment and oversaw construction:

Not a shock oil prices are rising just after a Trump victory, thanks to Russia's decision to cut production, in an agreement with other oil producers including Iran and the Gulf states. Putin's gift to Trump (and the Kochs, too!).

Bernie Sanders and Occupy Wall Street

One name that the DNI was willing to throw out in it's report was Occupation Wall Street, the far left movement that contested our nation's most precious freedom - the right to legally ripoff our fellow Americans by paying them billions less in less wages than a few Wall Street brokers and Hedge Fund Managers earn, all while ripping them off as consumers of financial services, too. Imagine the nerve of those people, wanting workers to have rights, and for the government to better enforce the few rights they did have! Well, as the DNI intelligence assessment stated regarding the RT media outlet funded by Putin himself, its broadcasts actively promoted OWS as "freedom fighters" against an oppressive and corrupt corporate/political system known as the "oligarchy.":

RT aired a documentary about the Occupy Wall Street movement on 1, 2, and 4 November. RT framed the movement as a fight against "the ruling class" and described the current US political system as corrupt and dominated by corporations. RT advertising for the documentary featured Occupy movement calls to "take back" the government. The documentary claimed that the US system cannot be changed democratically, but only through "revolution." [...] Simonyan [RT editor in chief] has characterized RT's coverage of the Occupy Wall Street movement as "information warfare" that is aimed at promoting popular dissatisfaction with the US Government. RT created a Facebook app to connect Occupy Wall Street protesters via social media. In addition, RT featured its own hosts in Occupy rallies ("Minaev Live," 10 April;

RT, 2, 12 June).

After all that "help" provided to OWS, it should come as no surprise that the single greatest threat to Hillary Clinton's election, the Bernie Sanders movement, was staffed by thousands of former OWS activists, many of them prominent names in the OWS movement to radicalize American politics to make it and our economy subservient to Russian interests.

In Sanders and in his campaign, the more mainstream elements of Occupy Wall Street have found an ideological ally. The Vermont senator's laser focus on economic issues are a big draw, local organizers said, but they also delight in his affection for the shoe-leather activism of past generations. A public show of electoral solidarity -- and a sign of things to come -- came last month, when prominent Occupy organizer Beka Economopoulos led a phone-banking effort for Sanders from Zuccotti Park. "It was another one of those moments that helped solidify the connection between the folks who had been part of Occupy and the Sanders campaign," Lenchner said.

In effect, OWS formed the heart of the sinister BernieBro movement, whose sole purpose was to demean and denigrate Hillary Clinton. People who would stop at nothing to defeat her pragmatic progressive agenda, even if that meant the election of TRUMP™ and the GOP.

And in light of events, who can say that they didn't do exactly what their Russian handler expected? They damaged Hillary in the primary with their constant rallies, which emboldened Sanders to attack Clinton for her many friendships and connections to the leaders of our free enterprise system. It's clear that Sanders' and his followers' anti-American attacks on Clinton dovetailed nicely with the Trump campaign's own treasonous messaging.

Robby Mook

I know some might find this odd, but all the circumstantial evidence supports my contention that Mook, Hillary's campaign manager was the secret Russian mole in the Clinton campaign. Consider that he operated a political campaign that outspent Trump's by a margin of 2:1. He made the unfathomable decision to "pivot" to Arizona and Texas, both long term GOP strongholds, as swing states Hillary could win, rather than dedicating resources to traditional blue states in the Rust Belt where the polls showed the race was tightening. He encouraged or enabled an air of entitled arrogance among the senior Clinton campaign staff, a top down know-it all approach that ignored veteran activists from the DNC and former Obama campaigns to veteran local pols on how to allocate resources and run a proper ground game.

“I’ve never seen a campaign like this,” said Virgie Rollins, a Democratic National Committee member and longtime political hand in Michigan who described months of failed attempts to get attention to the collapse she was watching unfold in slow-motion among women and African-American millennials. [...] “There’s this illusion that the Clinton campaign had a ground game. The deal is that the Clinton campaign could have had a ground game,” said a former Obama operative in Michigan. “They had people in the states who were willing to do stuff. But they didn’t provide people anything to do until GOTV.” Most importantly, multiple operatives said, the Clinton campaign dismissed what’s known as in-person “persuasion” — no one was knocking on doors trying to drum up support for the Democratic nominee, which also meant no one was hearing directly from voters aside from voters they’d already assumed were likely Clinton voters, no one tracking how feelings about the race and the candidates were evolving. This left no information to check the polling models against — which might have, for example, showed the campaign that some of the white male union members they had expected to be likely Clinton voters actually veering toward Trump — and no early warning system that the race was turning against them in ways that their daily tracking polls weren’t picking up. [...] State officials were banned from speaking directly to anyone at the DNC in Washington. [...] “Don’t touch them. Stay away,” one person on the other end of the call remembered Clinton campaign states director Marlon Marshall saying after hearing about a rogue conversation between a battleground operative and an official at the DNC. “You can’t be calling those people and making them think something is coming when nothing is. Mook himself made a number of those calls.

Instead, Mook and company relied on a computer program to make all their important decisions regarding the allocation of campaign resources, and more importantly where not to allocate them. A computer program that could have been infested with Russian malware from the very first day Mook began to rely upon its "simulations."

Of course, this may have been due to sheer incompetence. However, I ask you, is that really possible with so many smart people, with such great "political instincts," including the candidate's own husband and hordes of homegrown advisors, working so hard to ensure Hillary would win?

And Mook may not have been the only mole (think Elan Kriegel, e.g., her "analytics advisor, or John Podesta and his brother Tony with their many ties to Russian business interests, not to mention Bill "Big Dog" Clinton himself), but ultimately Mook bears the responsibility and the blame, and is the most likely candidate who set out to sabotage his own boss for reasons we may never know.

* * *

There are so many parties that the Russians used that the list could be endless. However, let's cut to the chase, shall we? The one single largest group that committed treason on behalf of Russia was ...

Democratic Voters Who Didn't Vote for Hillary

This is the clearest sign that Russia has been preparing for decades to install a Russian puppet in the White House. The millions of reliable Democratic voters who failed to show up on election day to vote for Hillary, or worse, voted for TRUMP™. Indeed, in the Obama campaigns in 2008 and 2012, these very same people came out to vote for Obama, that Kenyan born, black Muslim usurper. So why didn't they come out to vote for a true red, white and blue candidate like Hillary in the same percentages they voted for the black guy?

One could argue a lot of things, but sometimes the simplest answer is the best. These voters were Russian assets just waiting to be activated when needed. So, Mr. Smarty Pants, why didn't Putin activate them in 2008, or at least by 2012? Well, in 2008, Obama expressed a preference for working with Putin, just as George Bush had done. And by 2012, even if the relationship had soured, Putin recognized the Obama was weak and unlikely to pose a threat to Russia's program for world domination. Clinton on the other hand ...

WALLACE: Secretary Clinton, you have talked about — and in the last debate and again today — that you would impose a no-fly zone to try to protect the people of Aleppo and to stop the killing there. President Obama has refused to do that because he fears it’s going to draw us closer or deeper into the conflict. And General Joseph Dunford, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, says you impose a no-fly zone, chances are you’re going to get into a war — his words — with Syria and Russia. So the question I have is, if you impose a no-fly zone — first of all, how do you respond to their concerns? Secondly, if you impose a no-fly zone and a Russian plane violates that, does President Clinton shoot that plane down? CLINTON: Well, Chris, first of all, I think a no-fly zone could save lives and could hasten the end of the conflict. I’m well aware of the really legitimate concerns that you have expressed from both the president and the general. This would not be done just on the first day. This would take a lot of negotiation. And it would also take making it clear to the Russians and the Syrians that our purpose here was to provide safe zones on the ground.

But she previously admitted in private that a no fly zone would kill a lot of people, and would require an attack on Russian supplied and possibly manned manned anti-aircraft defenses in Syria:

An excerpt of a June 2013 paid speech Clinton delivered to Goldman Sachs, recently released by the WikiLeaks, shows that Clinton is well aware of how dangerous a no-fly zone could be. “To have a no-fly zone you have to take out all of the air defense, many of which are located in populated areas,” the former secretary of state explained in the 2013 speech. “So our missiles, even if they are standoff missiles so we’re not putting our pilots at risk — you’re going to kill a lot of Syrians.” “So all of a sudden this intervention that people talk about so glibly becomes an American and NATO involvement where you take a lot of civilians,” she added.

In fact, in October, Russia made threats against US warplanes operating over Syria if attacks were made on Syrian air defenses.

In Moscow’s starkest warning yet against Western intervention in the war, Russia’s chief military spokesman said that any airstrikes on government-held territory in Syria would be considered a “clear threat” to Russian servicemen.

Yet, despite these clear signs Russia was willing to shoot down US plane over Syria, and indeed deliberately tangled with US planes over Syrian airspace that same month, only Hillary stood up to the Big Bad Russian Bear, letting Putin know that he couldn’t have his way with the US if the country elected the first female President in its history.

So yeah, I think Putin cashed in his chips this year, and activated the millions of American sleeper cells that the FSB and its predecessor the KGB put in place over the last seven decades. Sleeper cells that the FBI failed to disclose except in limited cases. And what were they ordered to do? To vote for Trump in those key battle ground states, or stay home and not vote at all. After all, we do have proof they put someone deep into the Clinton circle in 2010:

One of the Russians, who identified herself as Cynthia Murphy of Montclair, N.J., provided financial planning for Alan Patricof, a New York venture capitalist and top Democratic donor who was finance chairman of Hillary Rodham Clinton's 2008 presidential campaign, according to news reports.

So now you know. It's much worse than Obama and the intelligence agencies who released their little 25 page "declassified report" let on. Russia owns us now, lock stock and barrel. He has the right, he has the left, and as was made clear in this last election the center could not hold. Alas, poor Hillary, we never had a chance to see your formidable war powers in action. Just remember this when we are all studying in re-education camps for our loyalty tests to Vladimir Putin and the Greater Russian Empire in a few years.

Steven D