1. Le Quéré, C. L. et al. Global carbon budget 2018. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 10, 2141–2194 (2018).

2. Schimel, D., Stephens, B. B. & Fisher, J. B. Effect of increasing CO 2 on the terrestrial carbon cycle. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 436–441 (2015).

3. Walker, A. P. et al. Decadal biomass increment in early secondary successional woody ecosystems is increased by CO 2 enrichment. Nat. Commun. 10, 454 (2019).

4. Norby, R. J. & Zak, D. R. Ecological lessons from Free-Air CO 2 Enrichment (FACE) experiments. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 42, 181–203 (2011).

5. Leuzinger, S. & Hättenschwiler, S. Beyond global change: lessons from 25 years of CO 2 research. Oecologia 171, 639–651 (2013).

6. Arora, V. K. et al. Carbon-concentration and carbon-climate feedbacks in CMIP5 Earth system models. J. Clim. 26, 5289–5314 (2013).

7. Ellsworth, D. S. et al. Elevated CO 2 does not increase eucalypt forest productivity on a low-phosphorus soil. Nat. Clim. Chang. 7, 279–282 (2017).

8. Körner, C. et al. Carbon flux and growth in mature deciduous forest trees exposed to elevated CO 2 . Science 309, 1360–1362 (2005).

9. Ryan, M. G. Three decades of research at Flakaliden advancing whole-tree physiology, forest ecosystem and global change research. Tree Physiol. 33, 1123–1131 (2013).

10. Klein, T. et al. Growth and carbon relations of mature Picea abies trees under 5 years of free-air CO 2 enrichment. J. Ecol. 104, 1720–1733 (2016).

11. Norby, R. J. et al. Model-data synthesis for the next generation of forest free-air CO 2 enrichment (FACE) experiments. New Phytol. 209, 17–28 (2016).

12. Pugh, T. A. M. et al. Role of forest regrowth in global carbon sink dynamics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 4382–4387 (2019).

13. Grassi, G. et al. The key role of forests in meeting climate targets requires science for credible mitigation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 7, 220–226 (2017).

14. Peñuelas, J. et al. Shifting from a fertilization-dominated to a warming-dominated period. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1438–1445 (2017).

15. Luo, Y. et al. Progressive nitrogen limitation of ecosystem response to rising atmospheric carbon dioxide. Bioscience 54, 731–739 (2004).

16. DeLucia, E. H. et al. Net primary production of a forest ecosystem with experimental CO 2 enrichment. Science 284, 1177–1179 (1999).

17. Crous, K., Ósvaldsson, A. & Ellsworth, D. S. Is phosphorus limiting in a mature Eucalyptus woodland? Phosphorus fertilization stimulates stem growth. Plant Soil 391, 293–305 (2015).

18. Medlyn, B. E. et al. Using models to guide field experiments: a priori predictions for the CO 2 response of a nutrient- and water-limited native eucalypt woodland. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 2834–2851 (2016).

19. Medlyn, B. E. et al. Using ecosystem experiments to improve vegetation models. Nat. Clim. Chang. 5, 528–534 (2015).

20. Friedlingstein, P. et al. Uncertainties in CMIP5 climate projections due to carbon cycle feedbacks. J. Clim. 27, 511–526 (2014).

21. Yang, J. et al. Low sensitivity of gross primary production to elevated CO 2 in a mature eucalypt woodland. Biogeosciences 17, 265–279 (2020).

22. DeLucia, E. H., Drake, J. E., Thomas, R. B. & Gonzalez-Meler, M. Forest carbon use efficiency: is respiration a constant fraction of gross primary production? Glob. Change Biol. 13, 1157–1167 (2007).

23. Norby, R. J. Forest canopy productivity index. Nature 381, 564 (1996).

24. Duursma, R. A. et al. Canopy leaf area of a mature evergreen Eucalyptus woodland does not respond to elevated atmospheric CO 2 but tracks water availability. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 1666–1676 (2016).

25. Drake, J. E. et al. Short-term carbon cycling responses of a mature eucalypt woodland to gradual stepwise enrichment of atmospheric CO 2 concentration. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 380–390 (2016).

26. Drake, J. E. et al. Three years of soil respiration in a mature eucalypt woodland exposed to atmospheric CO 2 enrichment. Biogeochemistry 139, 85–101 (2018).

27. Drake, J. E. et al. Increases in the flux of carbon belowground stimulate nitrogen uptake and sustain the long-term enhancement of forest productivity under elevated CO 2 . Ecol. Lett. 14, 349–357 (2011).

28. Hasegawa, S., Macdonald, C. A. & Power, S. A. Elevated carbon dioxide increases soil nitrogen and phosphorus availability in a phosphorus-limited Eucalyptus woodland. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 1628–1643 (2016).

29. Ochoa-Hueso, R. et al. Rhizosphere-driven increase in nitrogen and phosphorus availability under elevated atmospheric CO 2 in a mature Eucalyptus woodland. Plant Soil 416, 283–295 (2017).

30. Crous, K. Y., Wujeska-Klause, A., Jiang, M., Medlyn, B. E. & Ellsworth, D. S. Nitrogen and phosphorus retranslocation of leaves and stemwood in a mature Eucalyptus forest exposed to 5 years of elevated CO 2 . Front. Plant Sci. 10, 664 (2019).

31. Zaehle, S. et al. Evaluation of 11 terrestrial carbon-nitrogen cycle models against observations from two temperature Free-Air CO 2 Enrichment studies. New Phytol. 202, 803–822 (2014).

32. Fleischer, K. et al. Amazon forest response to CO 2 fertilization dependent on plant phosphorus acquisition. Nat. Geosci. 12, 736–741 (2019).

33. Todd-Brown, K. E. O. et al. Changes in soil organic carbon storage predicted by earth system models during the 21st century. Biogeosciences 11, 2341–2356 (2014).

34. Kuzyakov, Y., Horwath, W. R., Dorodnikov, M. & Blagodatskaya, E. Review and synthesis of the effects of elevated atmospheric CO 2 on soil processes: no changes in pools, but increased fluxes and accelerated cycles. Soil Biol. Biochem. 128, 66–78 (2019).

35. Luyssaert, S. et al. Old-growth forests as global carbon sinks. Nature 455, 213–215 (2008).

36. Jones, C. et al. 21st century compatible CO 2 emissions and airborne fraction simulated by CMIP5 Earth System models under 4 representative concentration pathways. J. Clim. 26, 4398–4413 (2013).

37. Australia’s Agriculture, Fisheries And Forestry At A Glance 2012 https://www.agriculture.gov.au/about/publications/glance2012 (Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, 2012).

38. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2000 FAO Forestry Paper 140 (Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, 2001).

39. Gimeno, T. E., McVicar, T. R., O’Grady, A. P., Tissue, D. T. & Ellsworth, D. S. Elevated CO 2 did not affect the hydrological balance of a mature native Eucalyptus woodland. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 3010–3024 (2018).

40. Hasegawa, S. et al. Elevated CO 2 concentrations reduce C 4 cover and decrease diversity of understorey plant community in a Eucalyptus woodland. J. Ecol. 106, 1483–1494 (2018).

41. Pathare, V. S. et al. Water availability affects seasonal CO 2 -induced photosynthetic enhancement in herbaceous species in a periodically dry woodland. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 5164–5178 (2017).

42. Paul, K. I. et al. Development and testing of allometric equations for estimating above-ground biomass of mixed-species environmental plantings. For. Ecol. Manage. 310, 483–494 (2013).

43. Collins, L. et al. Understorey productivity in temperate grassy woodland responds to soil water availability but not to elevated CO 2 . Glob. Change Biol. 24, 2366–2376 (2018).

44. Snowdon, P. et al. National Carbon Accounting System Technical Report no. 17 (Australian Greenhouse Office, 2000).

45. Wallander, H. et al. Evaluation of methods to estimate production, biomass and turnover of ectomycorrhizal mycelium in forests soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 57, 1034–1047 (2013).

46. Buyer, J. S. & Sasser, M. High throughput phospholipid fatty acid analysis of soils. Appl. Soil Ecol. 61, 127–130 (2012).

47. Gherlenda, A. N., Esveld, J. L., Hall, A. A. G., Duursma, R. A. & Riegler, M. Boom and bust: rapid feedback responses between insect outbreak dynamics and canopy leaf area impacted by rainfall and CO 2 . Glob. Change Biol. 22, 3632–3641 (2016).

48. Facey, S. L. et al. Atmospheric change causes declines in woodland arthropods and impacts specific trophic groups. Agric. For. Entomol. 19, 101–112 (2017).

49. Murray, T. J., Tissue, D. T., Ellsworth, D. S. & Riegler, M. Interactive effects of pre-industrial, current and future CO 2 and temperature on an insect herbivore of Eucalyptus. Oecologia 171, 1025–1035 (2013).

50. Trakimas, G. et al. Ecological stoichiometry: a link between developmental speed and physiological stress in an omnivorous insect. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 13, 42 (2019).

51. Farquhar, G. D., von Caemmerer, S. & Berry, J. A. A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO 2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 149, 78–90 (1980).

52. Medlyn, B. E. et al. Reconciling the optimal and empirical approaches to modelling stomatal conductance. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 2134–2144 (2011).

53. Gimeno, T. E. et al. Conserved stomatal behavior under elevated CO 2 and varying water availability in a mature woodland. Funct. Ecol. 30, 700–709 (2016).

54. Yang, J. et al. Incorporating non-stomatal limitation improves the performance of leaf and canopy models at high vapor pressure deficit. Tree Physiol. 39, 1961-1974 (2019).

55. Martins, C. S. C. et al. Identifying environmental drivers of greenhouse gas emissions under warming and reduced rainfall in boreal-temperate forests. Funct. Ecol. 31, 2356–2368 (2017).

56. Zhang, X. & Wang, W. The decomposition of fine and coarse roots: their global patterns and controlling factors. Sci. Rep. 5, 9940 (2015).

57. Reich, P. B. et al. Plant diversity enhances ecosystem responses to elevated CO 2 and nitrogen deposition. Nature 410, 809–810 (2001).

58. Gherlenda, A. N., Moore, B. D., Haigh, A. M., Johnson, S. N. & Riegler, M. Insect herbivory in a mature Eucalyptus woodland canopy depends on leaf phenology but not CO 2 enrichment. BMC Ecol. 16, 47 (2016).

59. Gherlenda, A. N. et al. Precipitation, not CO 2 enrichment, drives insect herbivore frass deposition and subsequent nutrient dynamics in a mature Eucalyptus woodland. Plant Soil 399, 29–39 (2016).

60. Drake, J. E. et al. The partitioning of gross primary production for young Eucalyptus tereticornis trees under experimental warming and altered water availability. New Phytol. 222, 1298–1312 (2019).

61. Salomón, R. L., Steppe, K., Crous, K. Y., Noh, N. J. & Ellsworth, D. S. Elevated CO 2 does not affect stem CO 2 efflux nor stem respiration in dry Eucalyptus woodland, but it shifts the vertical gradient in xylem CO 2 . Plant Cell Environ. 42, 2151–2164 (2019).

62. Raumonen, P. et al. Fast automatic precision tree models from terrestrial laser scanner data. Remote Sens. 5, 491–520 (2013).

63. Calders, K. et al. Nondestructive estimates of above-ground biomass using terrestrial laser scanning. Methods Ecol. Evol. 6, 198–208 (2015).

64. Davidson, E. A., Samanta, S., Caramori, S. S. & Savage, K. The dual Arrhenius and Michaelis–Menten kinetics model for decomposition of soil organic matter at hourly to seasonal time scales. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 371–384 (2012).

65. Guenther, A. B. et al. The Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): an extended and updated framework for modeling biogenic emissions. Geosci. Model Dev. 5, 1471–1492 (2012).

66. Emmerson, K. M., Palmer, P. I., Thatcher, M., Haverd, V. & Guenther, A. B. Sensitivity of isoprene emissions to drought over south-eastern Australia: integrating models and satellite observations of soil moisture. Atmos. Environ. 209, 112–124 (2019).

67. Kännaste, A., Copolovici, L. & Niinemets, Ü. Gas chromatography mass-spectrometry method for determination of biogenic volatile organic compounds emitted by plants. In Plant Isoprenoids: Methods And Protocols (ed. Rodríguez-Concepción, M.) 161–169 (Humana Press, 2014).

68. Tholl, D. et al. Practical approaches to plant volatile analysis. Plant J. 45, 540–560 (2006).

69. Li, T., Holst, T., Michelsen, A. & Rinnan, R. Amplification of plant volatile defense against insect herbivory in a warming Arctic tundra. Nat. Plants 5, 568–574 (2019).

70. Johnsen, L. G., Skou, P. B., Khakimov, B. & Bro, R. Gas chromatography—mass spectrometry data processing made easy. J. Chromatogr. A 1503, 57–64 (2017).

71. Keith, H. et al. Multiple measurements constrain estimates of net carbon exchange by a Eucalyptus forest. Agric. For. Meteorol. 149, 535–558 (2009).

72. Bates, D., Machler, M., Bolker, B. M. & Walker, S. C. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48 (2015).

73. R Core Team. R: A Language And Environment For Statistical Computing https://www.R-project.org/ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2018).

74. Ouimette, A. P. et al. Accounting for carbon flux to mycorrhizal fungi may resolve discrepancies in forest carbon budgets. Ecosystems https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-019-00440-3 (2019).

75. Harris, I., Jones, P. D., Osborn, T. J. & Lister, D. H. Updated high-resolution grids of monthly climatic observations—the CRU TS3.10 dataset. Int. J. Climatol. 34, 623–642 (2014).

76. Olson, D. M. et al. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on Earth. Bioscience 51, 933–938 (2001).

77. Jiang, M., Felzer, B. S., Nielsen, U. N. & Medlyn, B. E. Biome-specific climatic space defined by temperature and precipitation predictability. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 26, 1270–1282 (2017).

78. Scarascia-Mugnozza, G. et al. Response to elevated CO 2 of a short rotation, multispecies Poplar plantation: the POPFACE/EUROFACE experiment. In Managed Ecosystems and CO 2 (eds. Nösberger, J. et al.) 173–195 (Springer, 2006).

79. Linder, S. NPP Boreal Forest: Flakaliden, Sweden, 1986-1996, R1. Dataset at https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/201 (Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center, 2013).

80. Anderson-Teixeira, K. J. et al. ForC: a global database of forest carbon stock and fluxes. Ecology 99, 1507 (2018).

81. Shangguan, W., Dai, Y., Duan, Q., Liu, B. & Yuan, H. A global soil data set for Earth system modelling. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 6, 249–263 (2014).