Paul W.S. Anderson has put his name in the unofficial bidding for helming the first Metal Gear Solid movie... and that sound you hear is many a MGS fan bracing for the movie equivalent to a car wreck. Maybe.

How+awesome+would+Martin+Campbell's+MGS+movie+be?+(Answer:+Better+than+W.S.+Anderson's.)

What Say You, IGN-ers? Is Anderson the right man for the job? Or does Solid Snake deserve better? (We'll give you a hand there: Yes, Snake deserves better. Way better.)Metal Gear Solid and Solid Snake are two things very near and dear to our gamer hearts here at IGN. A movie chronicling Konami's badass is in the top five of things we want, sooner rather than later. But we don't want that movie to be done at the sacrifice of worthwhile storytelling and dynamic character development, which may be what happens if Anderson gets his wish.Sure, Event Horizon and the first Resident Evil movies are, to some extent, worthwhile in a guilty pleasure, might-watch-it-if-it's-on-TBS sorta way. But the director has yet to make anything more than slick-ass, bargain bin entertainments. He hovers somewhere near the vicinity of Hack and Meh, but the reason why this guy still has a career making mediocre to worse videogame movies is a mystery.Fans have waited a long time for a Solid Snake movie. Both they and the character deserve a helmer and a story that can tackle the complex and intricate Metal Gear world of the games in such a way that grounds it in a reality that mainstream audiences can handle. Anderson's resume doesn't support that he is the man for that job.So What Say You, good people of the interwebs: Who should direct the first Metal Gear Solid movie? Do you want a Snake mission on par with Casino Royale, or do you want a 2-star movie that is, at best, a rainy day diversion? Drop your opinions and wish-list of directors in the comments, and cast your vote in the poll.