Two Toronto-based organizations are launching a challenge to the constitutionality of Bill C-51.

Canadian Journalists for Freedom of Expression and the Canadian Civil Liberties Association are filing the lawsuit in response to the bill they call “overbroad” and “offensive.”

“C-51 is the most dangerous legislation we’ve had in recent Canadian history,” said Tom Henheffer, executive director of CJFE. “It will lead to a massive, massive chill on free speech, huge violations of privacy rights and of what is constitutionally protected speech in Canada.”

The Conservative government’s anti-terrorism legislation became law in June, but it’s been the subject of scrutiny and public outcry for the expanded powers it gives to police and the Canadian Security Intelligence Service.

The two organizations are appealing the bill with the help of Paul Cavalluzzo, a renowned constitutional lawyer who previously served as the lead commission counsel during the inquiry into the actions of Canadian officials in relation to Maher Arar.

“I feel that the government has gone far beyond the need to protect Canadians . . . terrorism is a problem, but that doesn’t give the government license to, in effect, run stampede over our rights and liberties,” he said.

According to Cavalluzzo they plan to challenge five sections of the bill:

They say the bill attempts to give CSIS the ability to get a warrant in secret that pre-authorizes violations of the charter.

They draw issue with the fact that twenty-one Canadian agencies have the authority to share or exchange personal information without any accountability or transparency.

They raise concerns about new provisions under the bill that give the government the ability to hold secret hearings relating to people the government is trying to deport and say the bill would limit the information available to special advocates working on behalf of the person being deported.

They do not support Secure Air Travel Act legislation which authorizes the government to have a no-fly list with the names of Canadians and, according to Cavalluzzo, evaluates the appeals of people who have their name on list in secret without representing their interests before a judge.

Finally, they do not agree with amendments to the Criminal Code which create a new offence of “promoting terrorism in general.” Cavalluzzo said the term is too vague and will limit journalists who write about national security.

The 20-page application goes into extensive detail about where the organizations believe the bill is unconstitutional.

CCLA executive director Sukanya Pillay said one of the biggest issues with the bill is that many of the powers it allows will be exercised in secret and without oversight.

“You have information being shared at warp speed without any review of whether it was necessary or proportional or being used solely for the purpose for which it was shared,” she said.

Henheffer called the challenge “the best chance to kill the legislation.”

“It (C-51) does so much to remove accountability and it destroys the system of checks and balances we have in this country,” he said. “It’s just stomach churning to think that these laws are being passed in Canada.”

Loading... Loading... Loading... Loading... Loading... Loading...

The CCLA and CJFE are accepting financial support for the charter challenge online at http://www.gofundme.com/c51ontrial

Note - July 21, 2015: Michelle Shephard, the Star's national security reporter, is a member of the board of Canadian Journalists for Free Expression. She recused herself from all board discussion and debate related to the CJFE decision regarding this court challenge and will not be reporting on this court challenge for the Star.