What is the problem with the Dawkins quote? He's specifying that people should learn good reasons to *oppose* eugenics. That people should study it carefully and understand all of the good reasons against eugenics, instead of just relying on trivial reasons like "Hitler did it, so it's bad." That's an anti-eugenics statement, and a pro-education statement. Why would this blog be opposed to that?

Asked by

aelfswithe

“instead of just relying on trivial reasons like "Hitler did it, so it’s bad.”“

"instead of just relying on trivial reasons like "Hitler did it, so it’s bad.”“

"instead of just relying on trivial reasons like "Hitler did it, so it’s bad.”“

"instead of just relying on TRIVIAL REASONS like "Hitler did it, so it’s bad.”“

"instead of just relying on TRIVIAL REASONS like "Hitler did it, so it’s bad.”“

History books aren’t just FUCKING PAPERWEIGHTS, you know.

Have I mentioned today that humanity is doomed? No?

HUMANITY IS DOOMED.

-ArteToLife