Easier connectivity and integration with SAP would be helpful. It would be improved by adding a drag-and-drop interface to help alleviate the coding. The support from Micro Focus needs a lot of improvement. The product has shown no development over the past 10 or 15 years. UFT is like a flagship of testing tools, but it's too expensive and people are not using it so much. They should work on their pricing to make themselves more competitive. It's now too heavy and they should be making it faster. We do an attempt at automatic regression testing. We schedule a test to start at a certain time. It takes a lot of time to download the resources and start UFT. Competitors in this area have tools that start faster and run the test faster. For example, if the test at our side will take 10 minutes, another tool will do that in one minute. The parallel execution of the tests needs improvement. When we are running tests in LeanFT, there are some limitations in terms of running the same tests simultaneously across different browsers. If I'm running a test, let's say to log in, I should be able to execute it through IE, through Microsoft Edge, through Chrome, through Mozilla, etc. This capability doesn't exist in LeanFT. Parallel execution of the test cases across different browsers need to be added. It is unstable, expensive, inflexible, and has poor support. More Micro Focus UFT Developer Cons »

Selenium uses a layer-based approach that is somewhat slower than Eggplant when it comes to executing code. Selenium is good when the team is really technical because Selenium does less built-in methods. If it came with more built-in and pre-built methods it would be even easier for less technical people to work with it. That's where I think the improvement can be. There should be standardized frameworks to build automation. Could have additional readability and abstraction. I would like to see XPath made more reliable so that it can be used in all browsers. The solution does not offer up enough information in regards to personality testing. The solution's UI path needs to be modernized. Technical support isn't very good. Sometimes their recommendations were not very clear. More Selenium HQ Cons »