If trapped would you become a victim, or drive through the mob?

The rioting in Charlotte turned even uglier overnight, after the apparently false claim that a black man was shot dead by police for pointing a book.

All evidence so far shows that the “victim” was a career criminal who had a gun and turned towards police.

This appears to be another false media narrative, just like “hands up, don’t shoot” in the Michael Brown case, but it was enough to spark mobs of racist rioters and looters who attacked people and each other, including people trapped in cars.

Anyone who was old enough to remember the 1992 Los Angeles riots after the police in the Rodney King case were found not guilty is old enough to remember Reginald Denny:

I’ve always wondered what I would do if I were in Reginald Denny’s situation. Would I stop and let myself and my family become victims, or drive through the crowd to get away even if it meant running over the attackers (lacking a firearm to defend myself). I resolved at the time of the Denny incident not become a victim.

In Charlotte, the scene was as bad as in Los Angeles, with violent attacks on innocent people by the mob:

Rioters took over the highway:

Drivers were trapped:

Portion of my interview with a truck driver caught in the protests @wsoctv pic.twitter.com/i1vz9GKFxn — Joe Bruno (@JoeBrunoWSOC9) September 21, 2016

and attacked on two separate highways:

This family was traveling on I-85 when they say #CLT protesters who were throwing rocks at drivers shattered their windshield. @wsoctv pic.twitter.com/Lz3Z3nU7iC — Mark Barber (@MBarberWSOC9) September 21, 2016

Looking at a situation out of control with motorists trapped among the racist thug rioters, Prof. Glenn Reynolds of Instapundit tweeted:

That got him suspended.

Glenn posts on Instapundit:

Sorry, blocking the interstate is dangerous, and trapping people in their cars is a threat. Driving on is self-preservation, especially when we’ve had mobs destroying property and injuring and killing people. But if Twitter doesn’t like me, I’m happy to stop providing them with free content. ANOTHER UPDATE: Was just on Hugh Hewitt talking about this. Since Twitter won’t let me respond to — or even see — my critics, let me expand here. I’ve always been a supporter of free speech and peaceful protest. I fully support people protesting police actions, and I’ve been writing in support of greater accountability for police for years. But riots aren’t peaceful protest. And locking interstates and trapping people in their cars is not peaceful protest — it’s threatening and dangerous, especially against the background of people rioting, cops being injured, civilian-on-civilian shootings, and so on. I wouldn’t actually aim for people blocking the road, but I wouldn’t stop because I’d fear for my safety, as I think any reasonable person would. “Run them down” perhaps didn’t capture this fully, but it’s Twitter, where character limits stand in the way of nuance. Meanwhile, regarding Twitter: I don’t even know that this is why I was suspended, as I’ve heard nothing from Twitter at all. They tell users and investors that they don’t censor, but they seem awfully quick to suspend people on one side of the debate and, as people over at Twitchy note, awfully tolerant of outright threats on the other.

We will add the Hugh Hewitt audio when available, and will update. (Update: AUDIO is here and transcript at Hewitt’s website.) Here is an excerpt from the transcript:

HH: What happened? GR: Well, you know, I actually tried to figure it out. I woke up and just found out my account was suspended, and didn’t know why and couldn’t find an email from them. It’s apparently a tweet I put up last night. They had a thing about how protestors were stopping traffic and surrounding vehicles on the interstate, and I said, perhaps a little too pithily, but it is Twitter, run them down. And apparently, that’s why, I don’t actually know that’s why they did it. but I assume that’s why they did it, because that’s what everybody’s talking about. I’ve heard nothing from Twitter. HH: Now let me do what I did with Donald Trump last week, ask you to expand. I think I know what you meant. If you are threatened, you can defend yourself. Is that what you meant, Glenn Reynolds?

GR: Yeah, I’ve blogged about that before where we’ve had other interstates blocked and people surrounded by mobs. I’ve always said I would just keep driving. HH: And so do you regret being pithy? Might you have said something along the lines of if threatened, you can run them down? GR: I mean, I guess, although I, you know, it’s Twitter. Pithy is what you do on Twitter, and you sort of expect people to figure out what you’re saying from context…. GR: But I have to say I don’t apologize for the sentiment. I think that this tactic of blocking people on the interstate and surrounding cars is itself violent. It is threatening. It is not peaceful protest, and it should not be permitted.

In the meantime, Twitter’s political bias is showing.

Advocate murdering cops? Twitter makes you a hashtag: #BlackLivesMatter Advocate self defense against rioters? Suspended. #FreeInstapundit — Orwellian_Dilemma (@Orwells_Dilemma) September 22, 2016

UPDATE: as of 10;05 a.m. @Instapundit is back.

Twitter has unblocked my account on condition of deleting the offending tweet. I've done so, but it's here:: https://t.co/DDkZd2el6Y — Instapundit.com (@instapundit) September 22, 2016

You know what this means. (Warning, video may cause seizures)



