1 Kerry, F. G. Industrial Gas Handbook: Gas Separation and Purification (CRC Press, 2007).

2 Darby, S. et al. Radon in homes and risk of lung cancer: Collaborative analysis of individual data from 13 European case-control studies. Br. Med. J. 330, 223–227 (2005).

3 Turkevich, A., Winsberg, L., Flotow, H. & Adams, R. M. The radioactivity of atmospheric krypton in 1949–1950. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 7807–7810 (1997).

4 Bowyer, T. W. et al. Elevated radioxenon detected remotely following the Fukushima nuclear accident. J. Environ. Radioact. 102, 681–687 (2011).

5 Rutherford, E. Absorption of the radio-active emanations by charcoal. Nature 74, 634 (1906).

6 Munakata, K. et al. Adsorption equilibria of krypton, xenon, nitrogen and their mixtures on molecular sieve 5 Å and activated charcoal. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 36, 818–829 (1999).

7 Gaul, W. C. & Underhill, D. W. Dynamic adsorption of radon by activated carbon. Health Phys. 88, 371–378 (2005).

8 Wright, P. A. Microporous Framework Solids (Royal Society of Chemistry, 2008).

9 Li, J. R., Kuppler, R. J. & Zhou, H. C. Selective gas adsorption and separation in metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 38, 1477–1504 (2009).

10 Bloch, E. D. et al. Hydrocarbon separations in a metal–organic framework with open iron(II) coordination sites. Science 335, 1606–1610 (2012).

11 Couderc, G. et al. Reversible sorption of nitrogen and xenon gas by the guest-free zeolite tris(o-phenylenedioxy)cyclotriphosphazene (TPP). Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 88, 170–175 (2006).

12 Carta, M. et al. An efficient polymer molecular sieve for membrane gas separations. Science 339, 303–307 (2013).

13 Van Heest, T. et al. Identification of metal–organic framework materials for adsorption separation of rare gases: Applicability of ideal adsorbed solution theory (IAST) and effects of inaccessible framework regions. J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 13183–13195 (2012).

14 Mitra, T. et al. Molecular shape sorting using molecular organic cages. Nature Chem. 5, 276–281 (2013).

15 Bae, Y. S. et al. High xenon/krypton selectivity in a metal–organic framework with small pores and strong adsorption sites. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 169, 176–179 (2013).

16 Wang, H. et al. The first example of commensurate adsorption of atomic gas in a MOF and effective separation of xenon from other noble gases. Chem. Sci. 5, 620–624 (2014).

17 Liu, J., Strachan, D. M. & Thallapally, P. K. Enhanced noble gas adsorption in Ag@MOF-74Ni. Chem. Commun. 50, 466–468 (2014).

18 Sikora, B. J., Wilmer, C. E., Greenfield, M. L. & Snurr, R. Q. Thermodynamic analysis of Xe/Kr selectivity in over 137 000 hypothetical metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Sci. 3, 2217–2223 (2012).

19 Liu, J., Thallapally, P. K. & Strachan, D. Metal–organic frameworks for removal of Xe and Kr from nuclear fuel reprocessing plants. Langmuir 28, 11584–11589 (2012).

20 Tozawa, T. et al. Porous organic cages. Nature Mater. 8, 973–978 (2009).

21 Willems, T. F. et al. Algorithms and tools for high-throughput geometry-based analysis of crystalline porous materials. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 149, 134–141 (2012).

22 Haldoupis, E., Nair, S. & Sholl, D. S. Pore size analysis of > 250,000 hypothetical zeolites. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 5053–5060 (2011).

23 Yang, L. et al. Synthesis and characterization of a new structure of gas hydrate. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 6060–6064 (2009).

24 Ohgaki, K., Sugahara, T., Suzuki, M. & Jindai, H. Phase behavior of xenon hydrate system. Fluid Phase Equilib. 175, 1–6 (2000).

25 Fogarty, H. A. et al. A cryptophane core optimized for xenon encapsulation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 10332–10333 (2007).

26 Fairchild, R. M. et al. A water-soluble Xe@cryptophane-111 complex exhibits very high thermodynamic stability and a peculiar 129Xe NMR chemical shift. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 15505–15507 (2010).

27 Taratula, O. et al. Crystallographic observation of ‘induced fit’ in a cryptophane host–guest model system. Nature Commun. 1, 148 (2010).

28 Parkes, M. V. et al. Screening metal–organic frameworks for selective noble gas adsorption in air: Effect of pore size and framework topology. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 9093–9106 (2013).

29 Perry, J. J. et al. Noble gas adsorption in metal–organic frameworks containing open metal sites. J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 11685–11698 (2014).

30 Simgen, H. Radon assay and purification techniques. AIP Conf. Proc. 1549, 102–107 (2013).

31 Lorenz, H. & Seidel-Morgenstern, A. Processes to separate enantiomers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 1218–1250 (2014).

32 Hasell, T. et al. Porous organic cage nanocrystals by solution mixing. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 588–598 (2012).

33 Dubbeldam, D., Torres-Knoop, A. & Walton, K. S. On the inner workings of Monte Carlo codes. Mol. Simul. 39, 1253–1292 (2013).

34 Dubbeldam, D., Calero, S. & Vlugt, T. J. H. Exploring new methods and materials for enantioselective separations and catalysis. Mol. Simul. 40, 585–598 (2014).

35 Hasell, T. et al. Reversible water uptake by a stable imine-based porous organic cage. Chem. Commun. 48, 4689–4691 (2012).

36 Liu, M. et al. Acid- and base-stable porous organic cages: Shape persistence and pH stability via post-synthetic ‘tying’ of a flexible amine cage. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 7583–7586 (2014)10.1021/ja503223j

37 Seo, J. S. et al. A homochiral metal–organic porous material for enantioselective separation and catalysis. Nature 404, 982–986 (2000).

38 Kim, K., Banerjee, M., Yoon, M. & Das, S. Chiral metal–organic porous materials: Synthetic strategies and applications in chiral separation and catalysis. Top. Curr. Chem. 293, 115–153 (2010).

39 Dybtsev, D. N. et al. A homochiral metal–organic material with permanent porosity, enantioselective sorption properties, and catalytic activity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45, 916–920 (2006).

40 Liu, B. Metal–organic framework-based devices: Separation and sensors. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 10094–10101 (2012).

41 Xuan, W. et al. A chiral quadruple-stranded helicate cage for enantioselective recognition and separation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 6904–6907 (2012).

42 Li, P. et al. A homochiral microporous hydrogen-bonded organic framework for highly enantioselective separation of secondary alcohols. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 547–549 (2014).

43 Hasell, T. et al. Controlling the crystallization of porous organic cages: Molecular analogs of isoreticular frameworks using shape-specific directing solvents. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 1438–1448 (2014).

44 Hasell, T., Zhang, H. & Cooper, A. I. Solution-processable molecular cage micropores for hierarchically porous materials. Adv. Mater. 24, 5732–5737 (2012).

45 Brutschy, M., Schneider, M. W., Mastalerz, M. & Waldvogel, S. R. Porous organic cage compounds as highly potent affinity materials for sensing by quartz crystal microbalances. Adv. Mater. 24, 6049–6052 (2012).

46 Mastalerz, M., Schneider, M. W., Oppel, I. M. & Presly, O. A salicylbisimine cage compound with high surface area and selective CO2/CH4 adsorption. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 1046–1051 (2011).

47 Mastalerz, M. Shape-persistent organic cage compounds by dynamic covalent bond formation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 5042–5053 (2010).

48 Zhang, G. et al. A permanent mesoporous organic cage with an exceptionally high surface area. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 1516–1520 (2014).