We can turn accusations of “racism” against those who employ it to silence us.

Submitted by Johannes Scharf

In his recently published article Anti-Racism is Immoral, Emmanuel Spraguer stated that the term “racism” is “essentially always and everywhere an underhanded attempt to end all civil debate and declare victory, by people incapable of reasoning above a very rudimentary level”. Needless to say, I wholeheartedly agree with his observation; but I also believe that we are able to turn this weapon against those who employ it to silence us.

In the past, the term “racist” was exclusively set aside for those people who thought that individuals belonging to a particular race were inferior to others per se and that their oppression was therefore justified. However, nowadays, anyone who might dislike the fact that Whites will become a minority in Western Europe and the United States in a few decades is called a racist. What SJWs do not realize is that the extension of meaning which the term “racism” underwent enables us to hold a mirror up to the self-declared anti-racists and expose them as secret racists. I will, therefore, argue that the very concept of anti-racism is deeply dishonest. Self-declared anti-racists, I believe, hate us so passionately because we constantly remind them of what they dislike about themselves.

In his book White Identity. Racial Consciousness in the 21st Century, Jared Taylor collected a sheer unbelievable amount of evidence for my hypothesis that not just we ourselves but also the goody-goodies are in actual fact “racists.” All the facts which I will present in the following are drawn from this scientific work.

I would like to start with an example from the state of North Carolina. At Westerly Hills Elementary School, black and white children sit next to each other, having lunch as if they were indeed color-blind. However, it is fool’s gold. The children have assigned seats. That is the only way to get black and white children to eat together. In schools in which children do not have assigned seats they are integrated in class but they self-segregate in the lunchrooms. Also, church congregations are in general mono-cultural since they cannot be forced to racially integrate.

Let’s just for a second imagine there was a law which stated that a certain percentage of Methodists had to be black, a certain percentage had to be white and a certain percentage had to be Asian. It would work somewhat like this: “Excuse me, Sir, we are really sorry but unfortunately it doesn’t matter that you champion the concept of the universal grace of God instead of the Calvinist doctrine of double predestination, because in our congregation the percentage of Whites is already 60 percent. Therefore, please try to find another faith.”

This is why nearly 95 percent of churches in the United States have congregations that are made up of at least 80 percent one race.

And furthermore, regarding schools, it is absolutely evident that white parents send their kids to other schools the very moment the number of black and Hispanic students is rising. It is mainly the children of the lower class who are forced to continue attending these schools. The exact same phenomenon can be witnessed in German cities like Mannheim, Berlin or Pforzheim. Those parents who can afford to pay 500 Euros per month send their kids to private schools – the others are left with nothing… Just a couple of weeks ago – in the magazine Focus – I learned of a school in Berlin-Schöneberg that was a hotspot for violence, and in which 99 percent of the students were not native Germans!

The second example I want to give of the hidden racism of the silent majority is closely related to the first. What do we immediately realize looking at the ethnic makeup of districts and entire cities in the United States? Well, the inner cities nowadays have become near exclusively black or Hispanic. By the school year 2006-2007, in Detroit the white percentage of students was down to 2.4 percent, in San Antonio it was 3 percent, and in the capital Washington, DC it was 5.7 percent. The whites – mostly with families with children – have long left these areas and moved to the suburbs. The same can be said of the parallel societies in European cities like Brussels, Malmö or Mannheim. Meanwhile however, also the suburbs are changing. They are getting successively darker. Thus, as early as the 1980s whites started moving north in order to get away from Southern California, which was becoming increasingly Hispanic. Many resettlers were drawn to Nevada County, which in only fifteen years had a population growth of 65 percent and remained 93 percent white.

It is not just that whites do not wish to live among blacks; blacks do not want to be around whites either. – And the fact that blacks and Hispanics have a mutual disinclination toward each other has long been known. How many people have lost their lives due to this hatred in schools and prisons, because again and again these groups are integrated against their will? But that would be the topic of a whole new article. Here we ought to remember that the personal deeds of members of the white middle class and upper class starkly contradict their alleged love of multiculturalism.

The postulates of egalitarians – none of their dogmas are scientifically sound – are being led ad absurdum by the deeds of those very people. They preach water and drink wine!

In contrast to whites, blacks and people belonging to other minorities in the United States do not hold back when talking about their dislike of other races. Taylor has dedicated two chapters of his book to quotations of blacks and Hispanics that are likely to make the blood run cold for those whites who still believe in multiculturalism.

In 2005, one Mr. Kambon, formerly a professor of African Studies at North Carolina State University in Raleigh, said that white people wanted to kill blacks, and that it was necessary to exterminate all white people off the face of the planet in order to solve this problem. When, shortly thereafter, there was a discussion about Prof. Kambon’s remarks with a black man on the radio, and this black man was confronted with similar suggestions by other African-Americans, he started laughing. He explained his amusement as follows: “Listen. I’m laughing because if I had a dollar for every time I heard a black person [talking about] killing somebody white I’d be a millionaire.”

In contrast, whites are so afraid of being called racists that they even lie about their friendships. When a sociologist at Duke University asked his white students to raise their hands if they had a black friend at the university, all did so. When he next asked his black students to do the same if they had a white friend on campus, not a single black student raised his hand. The percentage of blacks being about 10 percent of the student body, every black student would have had to have eight or nine white friends. Somehow I almost feel pity for these goody-goodies!

Also, the disapproval of interracial relationships is much greater in the black community than among whites. In a reader poll by Interrace magazine, it was revealed that the black city of Detroit was least receptive to mixed-race couples, while the whitest cities were the most welcoming. The black movie director Spike Lee once said: “I give interracial couples a look. […] They get uncomfortable when they see me on the street.”

With a third category of examples – this time originating from natural science – I want to substantiate my argument that not only we ourselves but also the goody-goodies themselves are in reality racists.

In 1996, after fifteen years of intensely studying children in regard to race, Lawrence Hirschfeld of the University of Michigan arrived at the conclusion that our brain functions in a way that made thinking racially an almost automatic part of our mental repertoire. Recent studies confirm this. Researchers from the prestigious Stanford University have found that people, if shown plain black profiles, are better at guessing the race than the sex or the age group.

MRI studies have brought to light other breathtaking facts. Whenever people are shown photographs of people they are unfamiliar with, a high activity in the amygdala can be observed. When these people are shown the same pictures a second time, there is no such high amygdala activity to be observed – except if the people in the photographs aren’t of the same race as the subjects of the study; in this case, their faces continue to provoke high amygdala activity. The amygdala is associated with fear and the analysis of threats. If I interpret these findings correctly, this suggests that the brains of people who live in a multiracial environment are constantly being put on the alert.

If we see someone else being injured in a particular part of the body, our nervous system reacts in a way as if we ourselves had been injured, although we obviously do not feel the actual pain. Mindful of this, an Italian research team showed white and black subjects short film clips of needles pricking hands. The findings of this study must be disastrous – downright devastating – for proponents of rainbow societies. When it was a white hand getting pricked, the sympathetic pain reaction of whites was far greater. Also, there was a greater surge in heart rate and sweat-gland activity. Blacks had the opposite reaction.

We see that the unconscious affinity toward our own race is a biological reality from which not even the most obstinately color-blind can escape. However, there is actually a group of people who do not have any built-in preference for their own race. They suffer from something known as Williams Syndrome. At the Central Institute of Mental Health in Mannheim, researchers had children aged five to seven match good or bad characteristics with photographs of various people. The normal children matched good characteristics with photographs of people of their own race – the negative characteristics they matched with people of other races. At the same time, twenty children with Williams Syndrome showed no racial prejudice whatsoever attributing the characteristics to different people.

People suffering from Williams Syndrome are not able to detect danger in the faces of people who may pose a threat. Moreover, they are also mildly retarded. Physical characteristics are a lathy thorax and drooping shoulders as well as a forward displacement of the tongue which often leads to an open mouth. It is believed that the communication between the amygdala and the pre-frontal cortex is impaired in these people’s brains.

The egalitarians now, as I see it, are left with two options: they either concede that, deep inside, they too think in racial categories, and that this racism is a gift of evolution which they may hate but cannot get rid of – or they let their shoulders hang down and start mouth breathing…

But there are indeed some goody-goodies who fall for their own life-lie. Those are the only ones I really have heartfelt sympathy for. Here, I want to give two examples which serve to demonstrate this phenomenon quite drastically and vividly.

A British woman by the name of Lowri Turner, whose second marriage was to a man from India with whom she has a daughter, describes her feelings when glancing at herself in the mirror holding her mixed-race child as follows: “[…] I am shocked. She seems so alien. With her long, dark eyelashes and shiny, dark brown hair, she doesn’t look anything like me […]. I didn’t realise how much her looking different would matter and, on a rational level, […] it shouldn’t. But it does.” There is thus a deeper emotional connection with her two sons from her first marriage, who are both milky complexioned. Quite similar was the reaction of an American woman who adopted a child from India. Convinced that race shouldn’t matter, she flew to India and returned to the United States as a “mother.” After a couple of weeks had passed however, she stared at the baby and “felt like a trespasser, performing ablutions on this private flesh […]. How could this be my daughter?” She started to look for similarities between her and the girl she had adopted. The woman was somewhat relieved that the hair of the child was straight and her lips weren’t too full.

Both women, by their own accounts, were ashamed of their feelings, but in my opinion, this shame is unfounded, because natural things are nothing to be ashamed of.

The desire to be able to recognize oneself in one’s children is completely legitimate and characteristic of any sane person. This was no mystery to the great black boxer Cassius Clay – better known as Muhammad Ali. During a talk show, he said: “Blue birds fly with blue birds, red birds wanne be with red birds. […] Every intelligent person wants his child to look like him.”

Mrs. Turner has even found out the deeper reason for her feelings. She says: “Evolution demands that we have children to pass on our genes, hence the sense of pride and validation we get when we see our features reappearing in the next generation. With my daughter, I don’t have that.”

It would probably be an insult to the intelligence of the readers of this website if I now started presenting evidence for the existence of races. Therefore I will refrain from doing so. The point remains that we would still be right in our assumptions if race was indeed merely a “social construct.” This would change absolutely nothing since the aforementioned neural activity would thereby not be altered. And that, of course, is the decisive factor!

By use of a last study which I deem absolutely noteworthy in this context, I will attempt to drive the ultimate nail into the coffin of multiculturalism.

The Harvard sociologist Robert Putnam studied forty-one different communities in the United States, ranging from the extremely homogeneous South Dakota to the multicultural juggernaut of Los Angeles. He found a strong correlation between homogeneity and levels of mutual trust. Contrarily, the most racially and ethnically diverse areas were also the areas in which he found the greatest distrust among the residents. Putnam wasn’t pleased with the results of his study and checked his findings by controlling for other variables such as poverty, age structure, education, population densities, and crime rates, but in the end, he was forced to conclude that “diversity per se” had a major effect. Among the consequences of the highly-praised diversity he listed:

a lower frequency of registering to vote and a lower likelihood of volunteering, fewer close friends and a lower perceived quality of life, along with more time spent watching television and more agreement that “television is my most important form of entertainment.”

His findings can be boiled down to a simple formula: ethnic diversity equals social disintegration.

And how many of my fellow Germans are already living in neighborhoods in which they make up a tiny minority? And to be sure, not the migrants are to blame for this unpleasant situation. There is no “problem of foreigners” in Germany. There is a problem with Germans. (And quite a massive one, at that…)

It was just yesterday that I involuntarily overheard a conversation of two elderly women in Mannheim who were talking about how the situation downtown has become unbearable. People were getting accosted by blacks and so on. One of the old ladies then said: “And all these people they have now let in! What these Africans look like! There one can really see that the human is the descendent of the apes.” I do not wish to validate this observation. But I am prepared to bet that none of the old women mentioned ever thought of voting for a right-wing party like the NPD, because such parties are “racist.”

If only whites could somehow pick up courage again and profess their feelings about race! Of course, they would have to stop lying to themselves in the first place… They are – as everyone else is – tribal (“racist”) by nature. Racial consciousness must yet again be viewed as something obviously natural, as something positive. Europeans truly do not have a reason to remain blithely unconcerned about the end of their existence – or to even welcome this trend. A race that has sent people into space – astronauts and cosmonauts – does not have the right to be indifferent about its future.

Whenever a white musician is playing reggae music, jazz, swing or rap “music,” he may be accused of cultural appropriation. The same is true for a white person who dresses up as an Indian for a carnival. The General Assembly of the United Nations has even issued a declaration against cultural appropriation (Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples). However, it would perhaps be more prudent not to cry over cultural appropriation all too much.

What if a black man is wearing a suit, is driving a car, is taking a ride with the train – or is even sitting in an airplane? In this light, wouldn’t he be scrounging off the benefits of another race’s civilization?

But let’s restrain ourselves to the field of music. What would the early jazz music have been without the clarinet, which was developed by German instrument makers around 1700? And one can hardly imagine swing without the saxophone, which was invented by the Belgian Adolphe Sax!

Just as Adam and Eve realized that they were in fact naked after they had eaten from the Tree of Knowledge, everyone who has wandered through Charles Darwin’s orchard of knowledge must have come to the awareness of racial differences. It is indeed an astonishing fact that the theory of evolution has not yet been banned from public schools. For someone who has eaten from the fruit of Darwinism, however, there can be no turning back without a total loss of self-respect. And we must call out to these people: Be courageous! Throw away the shackles of “political correctness” and breathe freely! Stand up against the platitudes and dogmas of the regime! You are not alone! By doing this, we take on the role of the little kid in the fairy tale who shouts: “The emperor is naked!”

Anyone who in view of all the aforementioned facts and perceptions still denies the fundamental importance of the race question or does not believe that racism is in fact an anthropological constant (perhaps one of the most striking commonalities between the races) must be – with all due respect – viewed intellectually on the same level as a creationist who thinks the earth was created in six days.

I would like to end this article with a quotation from the great American writer H. P. Lovecraft: “Race prejudice is a gift of nature, intended to preserve in purity the various divisions of mankind which the ages have evolved.”

And to the fact that Mother Nature has arranged it that way, we raise our glasses! To evolution!