2012-10-03 07:12

Ok... if a company changes the content of one of their products PRIOR to release, and also changes the content of the advertising to reflect the change of the product PRIOR to release... then how is it at all possible that it's false advertising?



Or do you think you should be able to sue car manufacturers because their production cars don't look like the concept cars they bring to auto shows?



This is what pisses me off about the Armored Kill crybabying going on. DICE/EA changed a mistaken ad that ran only on their own website well before the product was available to the public, and people who hadn't even bought the DLC yet were crying foul because it didn't contain features that it didn't even claim to have upon release. And Premium members, who paid for the content well in advance without what would or wouldn't be in the content even being considered in the purchase were crying foul as if the lack of new vehicle unlocks would somehow have deterred them from buying the DLC they had already long since paid for. It's ridiculous.



And now DICE changes the advertising for a pack that isn't coming out for MONTHS, and people are already crying foul?! Seriously?!

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. - George Bernard Shaw