On Wednesday, a new trailer for Netflix’s “Queer Eye for the Straight Guy” revealed that the show will blaze back to TV on Feb. 7. But is it time to give this reboot the boot?

The reality program, which originally aired on Bravo from 2003 to 2007, featured a quintet of perky gay men — dubbed “The Fab Five” — who would enter the homes of heterosexual schlubs, impart some homosexual wisdom and leave the dudes looking like freshly minted Patrick Batemans. Back then, “Queer Eye” glittered.

The series was fun, sassy and, above all else, representational. But more than a decade later, the premise of a pentagon of gay Henry Higginses temporarily entering a man’s life to turn him into a metrosexual is hopelessly antiquated. It fuels the damaging stereotype that gays are good for nothing more than just a few giggles and style tips — that they make better caterers and finer hairdressers than people’s friends and neighbors.

When “Queer Eye” originally premiered, the show was rightly lauded for the groundbreaking visibility it afforded homosexuals. Sure, “Will & Grace” brought gay characters to the forefront — but Jack and Will were fictional. Here were five real people, having a good time and being presented likably in a volatile moment when even Democratic politicians feared being publicly in favor of gay marriage.

Many shows throughout TV history have walked a similar path and, despite being arguably offensive, helped make waves for other groups.

Desi Arnaz hollering at his wife on “I Love Lucy” was perhaps not the most acceptable depiction of Latin Americans, but here was a Cuban man headlining an enormously popular comedy. Same goes for Jimmie Walker’s “Dy-no-mite!” on “Good Times.” Silly and stereotypical, yes, but it also introduced audiences to an African-American family going about their daily lives. Now, viewers cringe when a rerun of any of these programs pops up on TV Land at 2 a.m., but the shows were right for their particular time and place. Just as “Queer Eye” was right for 2003.

2018? Not so much.

“The original show was fighting for tolerance,” says a narrator in the trailer. “Our fight is for acceptance.” That’s odd. I thought the original series was fighting for fusion sushi and tailored suits. And, as for being accepted for who you are, that would seem a difficult aim on a show that’s all about fundamentally changing a person.

And besides, thanks to the original “Queer Eye,” the mantle in the battle for acceptance has since been picked up by regular gay people — at the office, at the gym, at the bar. And their effort to be open about who they are in their local communities is paying off. In 2003, just 48 percent of Americans thought gay relationships should be legal according to Gallup. Today, that number has steamrolled to 72 percent.

So, should a reality TV makeover show really be so obnoxiously self-righteous?

The press copy from Netflix seems to think so: “Our new Fab Five will forge relationships with men and women from a wide array of backgrounds and beliefs often contrary to their own, touching on everything from LGBTQ rights and social commentary to how to make the best farm-to-table guacamole!”

The original Fab Five consisted of a quintet of men, each with a special focus: Ted Allen was the Food and Wine Connoisseur, Kyan Douglas was Grooming Guru, Thom Filicia was Design Doctor, Carson Kressley was Fashion Savant and Jai Rodriguez was the Culture Vulture. In the New York Times in 2003, executive producer David Collins called them “gay superheroes.”

While the new show insists it will shed light on more hard-hitting topics, such as Black Lives Matter, the fairy godmother format has remained more or less the same. The new group includes Antoni Porowski (Food & Wine), Bobby Berk (Interior Design), Karamo Brown (Culture), Jonathan Van Ness (Grooming) and Tan France (Fashion).

This time around the posse will not be scurrying around New York City, like the original five did, but in Atlanta, Georgia, instead. Perhaps the thinking goes that, in this divisive political climate, southern states require more “gay superpowers” than the LGBT-friendly north. That would make Atlanta an off-kilter choice, considering it’s consistently named one of America’s “gayest cities” by the Advocate.

Just about everything to do with “Queer Eye 2.0” is breathtakingly misguided and poorly considered.

Allow me to play Emily Post, dears: When it comes to a changing society, one must never be fashionably late.