The power of feminists is awe inspiring. Feminists conquered and brainwashed the minds of lawmakers, police, interpol, press,United Nations. Wait, there is more! This article continues! Continue reading » Female evolutionary Superiority in social manipulation causes feminist Language Distortions’ universal acceptance » continues here »

The power of feminists is awe inspiring.

Feminists conquered and brainwashed the minds of lawmakers, police, press, the United Nations.

And people are not even aware of the sweeping changes feminists did, to encroach upon men’s rights, men’s well being, freedom. How much terror feminists managed to sow with teenage sex and child porn witch hunts. This sounds exaggerated? Please read on.

The feminist social manipulation skill superiority hypothesis

Females are superior in social manipulation & language distortion to foster their reproductive interest (An evolutionary hypothesis).

More provocatively it could be called “feminist cunningness hypothesis”, female evolutionary cunningness hypthesis, …… Any more naming suggestions?

Hypothesis: Females are vastly superior in social manipulation skills

In evolution, everything is result of an evolutionary arms race. (cheetah and gazelle’s running skills, bacteria vs. our bodily defense system, …) Skills and capacities get honed over time, to solve evolutionary tasks. Women, in evolutionary time, had the hard task to convince a much stronger man to assume his paternal role and take care of her offspring (which might be his, or even just his cuckold offspring). In any argument, men had clear superiority with 2 powerful weapons

economical superiority: men were the hunters, they had the meat, they also could defend and own territory

physical superiority: men could always win an argument by brute force, by simple violence.

So to achieve some kind of evolutionary long term equilibrium, women must have developed some weapeons to counter men’s economical & physical power. What weapons could they have?

Social manipulation: gossiping among women, ganging up together against the common enemy, making intrigues, badmouthing a man, destroying his reputation, manipulating the opinion of other men (and women).

Women would actually need the skills to win over other men to defend the female agenda. In order to counter men’s physical superiority, women needed to be better then men at these social manipulation skills. They could not confront men clearly straight on, or else men could resort to the big stick argument. They would have to “con” men into doing what is in women’s interest, without men noticing.

Women would have to manipulate epecially skillfully, when it has to do with reproductive success, with getting men to provide for them and their kids, with men staying away from other women.

So the historical stone age balance of power is:

men have economical and physical superiority,

women have verbal manipulation, cunningness, intrigue, social manipulation.

Nowadays, men surrendered their physical and economical power. Women maintained and expanded their verbal manipulative social power

Men surrendered both their advantages. Winning an argument with physical violence became criminalized. Women got to earn their own money, plus they get the government to collect pension money and child support from fathers that must pay up but have no say over how their money is being used. So most of the male power advantage waned.

Mass media and the internet even increased the verbal manipulative power of women beyond what they had in the evolutionary EEA, 50 000 years ago.

This would explain womens total win on all fronts. They started winning when they outlawed bigamy, made it a crime for consensual adults to engange in marriage with several partners, and now are curtailing the rights to have consensual sex for pay, with adolescents, take one’s own photograph and doing DNA tests on one’s own children.

Anecdotal and other Evidence

It is self evident that women must have developed some skills to counter the obvious male physical superiority.

I will explain the

reasoning behind my female-social-manipulation-superiority hypothesis.

I was inspired by the

Feminism as middle aged womens trade union to promote their selfish reproductive interest, even their plain interest in an easy life, trying to curb men’s access to more attractive or cheaper competitors.

I was wondering:

Why and with which methods do the feminist trade unions score such resounding victories

how do feminists convince everyone else to promote their goals?

And why are they winning the war on all fronts with absolute resounding victory?

there must be a special evolutionary skill how feminists manage to convince male law makers to support their warped feminist “women studies” logic and distract from the egalitarian goal of creating “men’s studies” and “men’s rights” (Feminist arguments against prostitution debunked)

Distortion and re-definition of language

When a “Rape” is not a Rape! The Abuse of the word “Rape”. & the Perversion of Language shows how language got re-defined for purely manipulative purposes.

Rape : in the past, rape was violent, non consensual sexual penetrative abuse. Nowadays consensual sex with a 17 year old was first called “statutory” rape, and a few years later, the word statutory got omitted. So a man having consensual sex with a 17 year old adolescent now became child rapist. Fondling a minor also became defined as rape, so indecently touching a minor also became rape.

: in the past, rape was violent, non consensual sexual penetrative abuse. Nowadays consensual sex with a 17 year old was first called “statutory” rape, and a few years later, the word statutory got omitted. So a man having consensual sex with a 17 year old adolescent now became child rapist. Fondling a minor also became defined as rape, so indecently touching a minor also became rape. Child : In the past a child was under 12 or under 14 years old, now 17 year-olds are children. In Europe, for the purpose of child porn, photos of 25 year olds with pony tails and young appearance are child porn.

: In the past a child was under 12 or under 14 years old, now 17 year-olds are children. In Europe, for the purpose of child porn, photos of 25 year olds with pony tails and young appearance are child porn. These definitions are clearly for manipulating purposes. It is easier to incite the public to severely punish a “child rapist” then for “fondling an adolescent” or “consensual sex with an adolescent”. Not only do they re-define perfectly defined terminology (indecent touching of an adolescent), they also banalize real rape: “No, I did not agree to have sex with my boyfriend. I REALLY got raped by a stranger who dragged me in the woods at knife point”.

Feminist arguments against prostitution debunked shows more example of feminine logic that amazingly gets even academic recognition, in spite of being devoid of any logic and inconsistent with our logical and legal system in all other fields of life

Such comments got me officially kicked out: Change.org sucks: “womens rights” feminists censor & silence dissent.

Warped due process and warped language confuse press and public

An example: an Italian court acquitted a man of rape charges because the woman’s jeans was so tight that she could not be raped unless she helped to take it off. How shocking. But, do you think he would be acquitted were there 3 witnesses or surveillance camera proof of the rape? of course not! He was tried on unproven accusations of one singe women. Had he committed another crime like robbery, bullying, he would not even be in court on a simple accusation with absolutely no other evidence. So one proof to the contrary correctly got the falsely accused off the hook.

Feminists managed to pervert due process of law. Men are guilty until proven innocent and get arrested on hearsay, on unproven accusations of one single person complaining of rape or child abuse. Would we apply such methods to real problems like neighborhood and school bullying, mafia intimidation, a lot of real world problems could be solved. Normally, everyone knows who the school bullies are, just clear proof is missing. If one single accuser, with no proof, could get a school bully arrested, lots of problems could be solved. Well, as collateral damage, a few would be arrested unjustly, but that happens with child porn and child abuse cases too. Even females as collateral damage get accepted, in pursuit of the higher goal of final domination * 25 hottest sex offenders any boy wishes to become a rape victim of

Childrens obesity, diabetes, early death due to bad nutrition is no concern for feminists

Feminists seem so concerned about children. I identified a real threat to our children: Childhood Obesity Promotion: Cartoon characters attract kids to junk food . Here the danger is real. Millions and millions of children get condemned to a life of diabetes, early death, due to obesity. Where are feminists protesting the violation of children.

17 year olds incapable to consent to sex?

But 5 year olds are capable to consent to fattening junk food?

Reminist logic is always selective, ad hoc. Convincing until you start questioning more deeply.

Can children agree to eating fattening McDonald’s meals, soda, and disease causing sugar cereals? No, they do not have to maturity to decide that. So, in analogy to the “rape” word for 17 year olds that allegedly cannot agree to sex (except to sex with peers of same age, strangely), what do you call feeding a person dangerous substances without consent?

Poisoning! We are poisoning our children and the guilty parties are advertisers, McDonald’s, and the parents. In analogy to a little known term: Food Porn arouses Lust for Food with No Nutritional Value I coined the term “Child Food-Porn” (Junk food advertising) makes our children obese & unhealthy.

How come feminists are so concerned about a 17 year old getting fondled? But no concern about a 4 year old getting raised towards a life of obesity and diabetes? Maybe feminists are not really concerned with children. The antifeminist explanation is the only one that makes sense.

Feminists enlist Interpol to track down depictions of nude adolesents

FEMINISTS Not worried about videos of kids getting spanked, killed, maimed clubbed to death

Finally I wondered Nude adolescent photos: a Crime. Videos of lynching, killing, beating adolescents are legal Prime Time TV. It is perfectly ok for prime time TV to show how a 16 year old gets killed by a youth gang mob with hits of planks to his head. If the same kid made love to his girl friend or were simply naked, this would be a huge crime. Amazingly, the entire might of interpol would go after every single person in the world that inadvertently would have downloaded such a photo.

The power of feminists is startling.

Feminists conquered and brainwashed the minds of lawmakers, police, press, the United Nations. I am in awe!

Feminists agenda brought sweeping changes in law & customs

Most feminist goals actually look very justified. But justified goals are the means to reach further reaching exaggerated goals and end up being true witch hunts instilling terror in the populace. The AntiFeminist blog is full of examples:

the noble goal of making deadbeat dads pay for their offspring got extended so fathers have to pay a large part of their income while having absolutely no say over how it is applied. A father normally can not say: “I pay xx University” but refuse to pay for a fancy car, fashionable clothes or a second rate University. He has to pay and nothing to say.



I also have seen examples of fathers whose paycheck decreased dramatically and owed more child and spouse support then they were earning. Also it is amazing with which vigor the justice system in most countries enforces child support claims.

In Germany, a law got defeated (thank god) that would give jail terms to fathers who did DNA testing to prove that a child was not his.

This is noble, but it is getting excessive.

All this deserves analysis by academics, in the light of recent evolutionary psychology research, and new research to test the hypotheses here.

Of course, the results speak for themselves. Self interested feminism is winning hands down. We only need to see if the explanation here is correct of if there are other explanations.

I hope, when men wake up, and well intentioned women see the effects of the drakonian feminist inspired witch hunt laws, maybe we can revert to reasonable laws we had 50-100 years ago.

Reading List: