I wanted to follow some of Feinstein’s money that came from contributors to her campaign and the first name on the list that popped up was a group known as Emily’s List. I had heard the name before and looked it up on DiscoverTheNetworks where I found near the top of the description another group I had heard of before, America Votes. This made us look up Emily’s list first to see just what the group is and we found that this group only contributes to Democratic women.

The lead-in comes from DiscoverTheNetworks:

“EMILY’s List (EL) is a political action committee that raises millions of dollars each year for Democratic, pro-choice, female candidates running for elected office. The organization strives to make these funds available to the recipients as early as possible in each election cycle, so as to give them every opportunity to gain maximum public exposure and credibility, and thus to access additional campaign donations from a wide variety of sources thereafter. “EMILY” is an acronym standing for “Early Money Is Like Yeast,” which, as EL’s slogan puts it, “helps the [political] dough rise.”[1] [1] One of the group’s major, long-term objectives is to help build a society where women “are equally represented at all levels of government and achieve the highest leadership positions with our legislative and executive bodies.” take our poll - story continues below Will You Be Voting In Person November 3rd?(2) Will You Be Voting In Person November 3rd?

Should the Government be Mandating Masks? * Yes No My State Is Not Allowing In Person Voting

Email *

Name This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Completing this poll grants you access to DC Dirty Laundry updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. EL is a national partner of the America Votes coalition. To view a list of additional members belonging to this coalition, click here.[2] [2] EL is also a constituent of the so-called “Shadow Party,” a term that DiscoverTheNetworks employs in reference to the large network of nonprofit activist groups that were initially organized by George Soros, Hillary Clinton, Harold Ickes, and others to support Democratic candidates and causes, and to guide the Democratic Party ever-further towards the political left. For a comprehensive discussion of the Shadow Party, its constituent members, and its agendas and activities, click here.

We will get to the Shadow Party affiliation after the America Votes is shown.

This group has some connections to the one and only, George Soros. No big surprise here, and I will show what Feinstein is also connected to through this group and another group she gets funds from, one called J Street. I will show that after we show the group noted on the Emily’s List page called – America Votes. From that group, the Soros association begins to climb all the way to what is called the “Shadow Party.” Yes, it’s a heavily dominated group that is funded and was started by none other than George Soros.

Is this strange that Dianne Feinstein has connection to these Soros-tied groups, of which are many?

Let us move on to the America Votes.

AMERICA VOTES (AV)

Coalition of get-out-the-vote organizations

This is a lot to associate Senator Feinstein to but it is there for all to see. That is just a small part of the information on America Votes and it also is deeply associated with George Soros. One has to question why would Senator Feinstein would allow her name to be associated with these groups. It seems that the list just goes on and on with some sort of association to groups either supported by or related to George Soros. Senator Feinstein could never say she is not associated with George Soros and her campaign money shows two groups which have connections to George Soros, Emily’s List and J Street. Both of those organizations have associations close to and in some way aligned to the George Soros and his ideologies. Let’s show the association to George Soros with America Votes.

Notice that once again, George Soros is mentioned in the description of America Votes. Senator Feinstein is connected to all this by association to these groups through Emily’s List and America Votes.

Now, let’s show another connection.

Once again, we see that J Street is also not just connected to George Soros, but was secretly funded by Soros and is probably still being funded in a secretive way. We see that J Street has an association with other groups that are also either supported by George Soros or are part of the George Soros “Shadow Party.” It would seem that maybe other groups, not reported, might also be part of the George Soros arm of funding through groups that do not wish to make America great to any end.

The “Shadow Party” a group begun by George Soros, Harold Ickes, and many others.

Right off the bat, we see the names of people of which we are familiar, but let us take this a bit further. You can read the entire profile on the Shadow Party, now called the “Deep State.” Senator Feinstein is associated with this group from donations to her campaigns. So, in a sense, we can say she has accepted money from those associated with the “Shadow Party,” but allow me to show a bit more of the “Shadow Party.”

George Soros had quietly laid the groundwork for the Shadow Party apparatus from 1994 to 2002. During that period, the billionaire spent millions of dollars promoting the passage of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, better known as the McCain-Feingold Act,[1] which was ultimately signed into law in November 2002 by President Bush. Soros began working on this issue shortly after the 1994 midterm elections, when for the first time in nearly half a century, Republicans had won strong majorities in both houses of Congress. Political analysts at the time attributed the huge Republican gains in large part to the effectiveness of television advertising, most notably the “Harry and Louise” series (which cost $14 million to produce and air) where a fictional suburban couple exposed the many hidden, and distasteful, details of Hillary Clinton’s proposals for a more socialized national health-care system. Soros was angry that such advertisements were capable of overriding the influence of the major print and broadcast news media, which, because they were overwhelmingly sympathetic to Democrat agendas, had given Hillary’s plan a great deal of free, positive publicity for months. Three weeks after the 1994 elections, Soros announced that he intended to “do something” about “the distortion of our electoral process by the excessive use of TV advertising.”[2] That “something” would be campaign-finance reform.

Starting in 1994, Soros’s Open Society Institute and a few other leftist foundations began bankrolling front groups and so-called “experts” whose aim was to persuade Congress to swallow the fiction that millions of Americans were clamoring for “campaign-finance reform.” This deceptive strategy was the brainchild of Sean Treglia, a former program officer with the Pew Charitable Trusts.[3] Between 1994 and 2004, some $140 million of foundation cash was used to promote campaign-finance reform. Nearly 90 percent of this amount derived from just eight foundations, one of which was the Open Society Institute, which contributed $12.6 million to the cause.[4] Among the major recipients of these OSI funds were such pro-reform organizations as the Alliance For Better Campaigns ($650,000); the Brennan Center for Justice (more than $3.3 million); the Center For Public Integrity ($1.7 million); the Center For Responsive Politics ($75,000); Common Cause ($625,000); Democracy 21 ($300,000); Public Campaign ($1.3 million); and Public Citizen ($275,000).[5] The “research” which these groups produced in order to make a case on behalf of campaign-finance reform was largely bogus and contrived. For instance, Brennan Center political scientist Jonathan Krasno had clearly admitted in his February 19, 1999 grant proposal to the Pew Charitable Trusts that the purpose of the proposed study was political, not scholarly, and that the project would be axed if it failed to yield the desired results: “The purpose of our acquiring the data set is not simply to advance knowledge for its own sake, but to fuel a continuous multi-faceted campaign to propel campaign reform forward. Whether we proceed to phase two will depend on the judgment of whether the data provide a sufficiently powerful boost to the reform movement.” The stated purpose of McCain-Feingold was to purge politics of corruption by: (a) putting restrictions on paid advertising during the weeks just prior to political elections, and (b) tightly regulating the amount of money that political parties and candidates could accept from donors. Vis à vis the former of those two provisions, the new legislation barred private organizations, including unions, corporations, and citizen activist groups, from advertising for or against any candidate for federal office on television or radio during the 60 days preceding an election, and during the 30 days preceding a primary. During these blackout periods, only official political parties would be permitted to engage in “express advocacy” advertising, i.e., political ads that explicitly urged voters to “vote for” or “vote against” a specified candidate. Equally important, major media networks were exempted from McCain-Feingold’s constraints; thus they were free to speak about candidates in any manner they wished during their regular programming and news broadcasts. This would inevitably be a positive development for Democrats, who enjoyed the near-universal support of America’s leading media outlets.[6] 1. Laura Blumenfeld, “Soros’s Deep Pockets vs. Bush,” The Washington Post(November 11, 2003)

2.David Horowitz and Richard Poe, The Shadow Party (2006), pp. 131-136

3. http://www.richardpoe.com/2005/03/25/pewgate-the-battle-of-the-blogosphere/ ; Ryan Sager, “Buying ‘Reform’: Media Missed Millionaires’ Scam,” New York Post (March 17, 2005). 4. http://www.richardpoe.com/2005/03/25/pewgate-the-battle-of-the-blogosphere/ ; Ryan Sager, “Buying ‘Reform’: Media Missed Millionaires’ Scam,” New York Post (March 17, 2005). (The other seven major contributors were the Pew Charitable Trusts ($40.1 million); the Schumann Center for Media and Democracy ($17.6 million); the Carnegie Corporation of New York ($14.1 million); the Joyce Foundation ($13.5 million); the Jerome Kohlberg Trust ($11.3 million); the Ford Foundation ($8.8 million); and the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation ($5.2 million). 5. Byron York, “The Soros Agenda: Free Speech for Billionaires Only,” Wall Street Journal (January 3, 2004); Byron York, “Democrats Throw The Spirit Of Reform Out The Window,” The Hill (November 5, 2003); Byron York, The Vast Left Wing Conspiracy (2005), p. 62. 6. http://www.mrc.org/static/biasbasics/MediaBias101.aspx

I have shown some of Senator Feinstein’s connections to George Soros and Soros-tied groups like Emily’s List and J Street, but also her connection to the “Shadow Party”; and George Soros, like many Democrats, are working to destroy our nation, not fix it.

Do yourself a favor and follow all the links in the article above to see just how much the Democrats have misaligned themselves against our nation. This is with just one US senator!

In the next article, I’ll show other Democratic senators with similar ties. It is very strange but so far we have not found this to be true for the Republican Senators.

Think about that for a while.

Courtesy of Freedom Outpost

Leon Puissegur is a Disabled Vietnam Veteran with 3 children and 9 grandchildren. He has been married to the same wonderful lady for 43 years. He is an award winning author and has been writing opinion pieces over the years and in just the last few years has written 4 books and a large amount of articles on many sites. You can purchase his books at Amazon. Pick up his latest The Oil Man.