In the actual filing, she explicitly states that the court either didn't read the original complaint or (and get this) is being controlled by, and in conspiracy with the executive branch. Get a load of this language:

"The fact that Court's 14 page order does not address any actual statements in Plaintiff's complaint by page or paragraph number, or any page citation to her TRO, suggests to a reasonable and objective mind that the Court either did not read these documents or was summarily instructed by that same illegitimate "chain of command" alleged above not to address at least three key questions asserted in Plaintiff's complaint..."

and then it goes even deeper in accusing the Court of conspiracy by saying:

"The Court's failure to address these three key issues again, standing alone, is suggestive that the executive branch is exercising control over the Court's decision making process, and is sufficient ground, by itself, to justify this Court's grant of an EMERGENCY STAY OF DEPLOYMENT for at least TEN DAYS..."

So she is saying, in the actual Court filing, that the Court either is incompetent or is in conspiracy with the administration.

Wow. Just plain wow.

If nothing else, this outta put her on the fast track to a serious fine, a court summons, disbarment, contempt of court charges and possibly even jail time.

Orly Taitz, Esq. Onward and upward!

Update: Thanks for making this hit the rec. list.

Update #2: Seems my typing and spell checking is as good as Ms. Taitz legal acumen. Fixed "contentment of court" for "contempt of court". h/t to jgilhousen for the catch.

Update #3: Fixed a grammatical error in the second sentence. h/t to JackND for the catch.