DNC Court Case Exposing The Democrat Party

United States Florida Southern District Court

Case No. 16-61511-CIV-WJZ

The suit claims that the DNC acted against its charter when it showed demonstrable favoritism towards Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primary, and failed to secure the data of DNC donors. The suit could have massive significance for the Democratic Party and could have an even wider impact if the origin of the DNC leaks are disclosed in the proceedings.

The court released a copy of this April 25th transcript which has been brought against the DNC by Sanders supporters.

Opinion.com author Michael Sainato wrote on May 1, 2017:

“Throughout the hearing, lawyers representing the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz double down on arguments confirming the disdain the Democratic establishment has toward Bernie Sanders supporters and any entity challenging the party’s status quo.” In large part, the mainstream media has not covered the lawsuit in the six months between the court’s initial hearings in October 2016 to its latest hearing on April 25, 2017. In the latest hearing, attorneys representing the DNC repeated the tone-deaf argument that neutrality is a political promise and that the DNC can do whatever it wants without being legally bound to the charter. The resulting message is that the Democratic Party serves the interests of itself and its wealthy donors and that its voters have no choice but to deal with their totalitarian authority and undemocratic processes”

DNC attorneys arguments during the trial:

-They claim Article V, Section 4 of the DNC Charter—stipulating that the DNC chair and their staff must ensure neutrality in the Democratic presidential primaries—is “a discretionary rule that it didn’t need to adopt to begin with.”

-Arguing that Sanders supporters knew the primaries were rigged, therefore annulling any potential accountability the DNC may have.

-People who supported Bernie Sanders would have not given to Senator Sanders if they had known that there was supposed favoritism.

– It is a political weapon against the DNC and its former chairperson, Congresswoman Debbie Wassermann Schultz.

Sanders attorneys leveled six accusations against the DNC:

Count 1, fraud by the DNC Donor Class and the Sanders Donor Class.

Count 2, negligent misrepresentation by the DNC Donor Class and the Sanders Donor Class.

Count 3, violation of Section 28-3904 of the District of Columbia code by the DNC Donor Class and the Sanders Donor Class.

Count 4, unjust enrichment by the DNC Donor Class.

Count 5, breach of fiduciary duty by the Democratic Party Class.

Count 6, negligence by the DNC Donor Class.

–##–

Interesting side note to this trial:

Observer also wrote an earlier article in May covering the DNC debacle titled “DNC Lawsuit Recap: Democracy Averted.” In that article, the lawsuit was initially tied up in court after the attorneys representing the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz affirmed that the suit was not properly served by process-server Shawn Lucas, who served a DNC staff member at DNC headquarters in late July. In November 2016, Lucas unexpectedly passed away in an accidental death caused by mixing pain relief medications.

The DNC attorneys did succeed in getting the court to rule in favor of quashing the server of process on August 30, but it was properly served on September 2.

ZeroHedge article May 30, 2017 by William Craddick titled “DNC Lawsuit Exposes Corruption, Data Breaches, Raises Questions About Death Of Shawn Lucas.”

If the law firm Beck and Lee can successfully gain the right to discovery on the origin of the DNC documents, the mystery regarding whether Seth Rich leaked the information might potentially be resolved. Jared Beck has stated via twitter that Seth Rich would have been a potential witness in the DNC lawsuit. If Rich did indeed leak the DNC emails to Wikileaks, the ‘Russian hacking’ narrative would be utterly negated. The Becks have copies of their communications with Washington D.C. police that include discussion regarding the body cameras worn by police as well as Shawn Lucas’ death report. Police reports describe how Shawn Luca’s girlfriend found him unconscious on the bathroom floor in early August. Paramedics were unable to revive him. Lucas’ cause of death was described by the Office of Chief Medical Examiner of Washington D.C as “Combined adverse effects of fentanyl, cyclobenzaprine, and mitragynine,” with the manner of death listed as “accident.” The Becks have indicated Shawn Lucas was to be a Federal witness in the proceedings. Lucas would have served as a witness in order to rebut the defendant’s contention that process was incorrectly served. This would have included a sworn declaration from Lucas; Beck stated that footage of Lucas serving process had been introduced as evidence in the case in his stead, due to the unexpected death.

Speculation is rift that this was an assassination not an accident. Certainly there is cause for the speculation since if the drugs listed, fentanyl, cyclobenzaprine, and mitragynine, by ZeroHedge are the ones in fact, then that combination would have been lethal.

Fentanyl is a strong opioid pain medication, sometimes used as part of anaesthesia. (Both Prince and Michael Jackson died from overdoses of Fentanyl.) Cyclobenzaprine is a muscle relaxant. Mitragynine is a component of ‘herbal high’ preparations in the Western world.

Somehow I simply cannot fathom a large healthy looking man like Shawn knowingly adding two different extremely powerful drugs and a herbal high opiod together in one cocktail. I realize people do strange things especially today with all the “recreational” use of opiods but looking at the man in that video does not lead me to think he would have acted so irresponsibly.

Yet again we find medical examiners subscribing “accident” or “suicide” or “robbery gone bad” to death involving people who have some connection to or are investigating suspicious Democrat activities. So when do we draw a line and say enough? Obviously attempting to actually try to bring people in the Democrat Party to justice or to question their activities either from within its ranks or as outside sources is lethal to those who are involved. Given the attorneys’ attitudes in the DNC case, it really isn’t a stretch to believe that those powerful agenda-driven members in the party would bother with worrying about resorting to murder.

–00–

Each year we go through many election cycles around the country. Some are for local business, some affect states and their laws, while the more contentious elections most often are reserved for federal election cycles for congress and presidency.

We rally around political parties such as the Democrat and Republican which we believe most represents our opinions. Often we are hit up constantly to donate huge sums of money during the year for not only current candidates but for succeeding years. Money is either exchanged or volunteer activities are done.

Do we know that the party we chose is really using our money lawfully or that they are above-board in their treatment of member rights?

Apparently not, as the current DNC court case has been exposing.

Conservatives, constitutionalists, and most informed citizens have known for years that things have been off in BOTH major parties.

The liberal voters after leaked documents decided to take the National Democrat Party to court. What is coming out should be a warning to all citizens about making sure that every political party is following all the laws and being fair about their handling of funds to all of those running for office.

People with common sense have for years declared PACs as a threat to the democratic process. OpenSecrets estimated that over $615 million was raised in 2016 by candidates through PACs just on the presidential election. Their push to gather huge bankrolls of funds is not transparent and could be easily be in question as to who and how much is being donated by foreign entities or individuals with agendas that are against our country’s interests.

There have always been allegations of “back room” deals, party favoritism, and partisan political maneuvers. Most citizens of voting age simply sigh and shrug remarking what can be done. This is the way it has been, is, and will always be.

WHY?

Shouldn’t we as voters demand better of those parties that we have chosen to side with? Shouldn’t we be better assured of fair and unbiased handling of our hard-earned money to make sure our values, interests, and beliefs are best represented without interference? How can we hope to have our voices heard during legal or congressional sessions on any level if we can not be assured that our own political party is performing lawfully and with our goals in mind?

As we have seen over the last year, exorbitant amounts of money have rolled into both parties but in particular to the Democrat Party as they tried to outspend and outmaneuver the Republican candidates. According to OpenSecrets, over $1.5 billion was raised by presidential candidates. That amount could have made a lot of difference in education assistance, health, environment, or a dozen other needed programs.

Even now from the smallest local races to special elections for vacated congressional seats, the Democrat Party is funneling huge dollars into campaigns and favored candidates in order to make sure they are able to influence and by extension continue to rewrite our laws and government from the ground floor up. Republican candidates are responding for the most part in kind to keep up.

For instance, LATimes reported that the March local and school board races that in their schoolboard race a whopping total of $3,358,847 had been spent for the three schoolboard seats while all eleven other city elections reported only a total of $465,803 spent. In Montana, reportedly the cost of the seat for congress faceoff was a minimum of $12.4 million, more than has been spent on any House race in the state going back at least as far as 1990.

It is time to clamp down on the illegal activities behind the Democrat Party as has been shown by the trial. It is also time to stop the massive amounts of outside contributions being funneled in to local, county, and state elections from people who have no skin in the communities. Just as importantly it is time to force PACs to list ALL donors, their origins and anything else that would make them more transparent to the FEC and regulatory commissions.

Above all, we citizens regardless of political leaning should be assured that our vote counts and not backroom pandering and deals decided by national committees before we have had a chance to cast our ballots. The buck stops here. Before another election is run, pressure by concerned citizens should be placed on election officials to do their jobs to assure each of us that our votes and our candidates have an equal opportunity to present their cases and be able to run clean races. We also should have the assurance that illegal votes cast will not happen again because care has been taken to follow laws not corrupt, illegal practices. Clean up those voter rolls NOW before another election rolls around.

–Uriel–

Share this: Email

Facebook

Twitter

MeWe



Like this: Like Loading...