Abstract The analysis of the human remains from the megalithic tomb at Alto de Reinoso represents the widest integrative study of a Neolithic collective burial in Spain. Combining archaeology, osteology, molecular genetics and stable isotope analysis (87Sr/86Sr, δ15N, δ13C) it provides a wealth of information on the minimum number of individuals, age, sex, body height, pathologies, mitochondrial DNA profiles, kinship relations, mobility, and diet. The grave was in use for approximately one hundred years around 3700 cal BC, thus dating from the Late Neolithic of the Iberian chronology. At the bottom of the collective tomb, six complete and six partial skeletons lay in anatomically correct positions. Above them, further bodies represented a subsequent and different use of the tomb, with almost all of the skeletons exhibiting signs of manipulation such as missing skeletal parts, especially skulls. The megalithic monument comprised at least 47 individuals, including males, females, and subadults, although children aged 0–6 years were underrepresented. The skeletal remains exhibited a moderate number of pathologies, such as degenerative joint diseases, healed fractures, cranial trauma, and a low intensity of caries. The mitochondrial DNA profiles revealed a pattern pointing to a closely related local community with matrilineal kinship patterns. In some cases adjacent individuals in the bottom layer showed familial relationships. According to their strontium isotope ratios, only a few individuals were likely to have spent their early childhood in a different geological environment, whilst the majority of individuals grew up locally. Carbon and nitrogen isotope analysis, which was undertaken to reconstruct the dietary habits, indicated that this was a homogeneous group with egalitarian access to food. Cereals and small ruminants were the principal sources of nutrition. These data fit in well with a lifestyle typical of sedentary farming populations in the Spanish Meseta during this period of the Neolithic.

Citation: Alt KW, Zesch S, Garrido-Pena R, Knipper C, Szécsényi-Nagy A, Roth C, et al. (2016) A Community in Life and Death: The Late Neolithic Megalithic Tomb at Alto de Reinoso (Burgos, Spain). PLoS ONE 11(1): e0146176. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146176 Editor: Siân E. Halcrow, University of Otago, NEW ZEALAND Received: June 26, 2015; Accepted: December 13, 2015; Published: January 20, 2016 Copyright: © 2016 Alt et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files. The HVS-I mtDNA consensus sequences were uploaded to GenBank (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank) under the accession numbers KT868907-KT868932. Funding: The archaeological research was supported and financed by the Junta de Castilla y León (Spain), the anthropological analyses by the German Research Foundation Al 287/14-1, the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Germany (no grant number), and the Danube Private University, Krems, Austria (no grant number). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction Once the Neolithic had been established in the Middle East the new way of life spread from the 7th millennium BC onwards via different routes into Europe. The earliest evidence of farming and animal husbandry on the Iberian Peninsula dates from as early as the 6th millennium BC and is found in the eastern Mediterranean coastal regions, southern Spain and to a lesser extent in the interior [1–5]. Towards the end of the 6th millennium farming had already spread throughout almost the entire peninsula [5]. The Neolithic on the Iberian Peninsula can be divided into an early (5700−4500 cal BC), a middle (4500−4000 cal BC) and a late (4000−3000 cal BC) phase [6]. The earliest evidence of pulses and cereals found so far was unearthed in the interior of Iberia at La Lámpara, La Revilla del Campo, and La Vaquera [2,4]. This early phase of agriculture already comprised a wide range of farming produce: wheat, barley, pulses (peas, lentils, beans) as well as vetch, flax, and poppy. The considerable variety of agricultural crops that have different requirements with regard to their cultivation, processing and use shows that these early farmers already had extensive knowledge of farming [2]. The Neolithic also introduced new funerary rites into Western Europe. The first so-called megalithic tombs were built in Spain, Portugal and France using large blocks and slabs of stone. Soon thereafter similar megalithic tombs appeared along the European Atlantic coast, in Britain and Ireland, Scandinavia and the European interior [7]. In the interior of the Iberian Peninsula these tombs began to appear at the end of the 5th millennium BC [8] and spread throughout the entire region over the course of the 4th millennium BC [5]. The funerary monuments were extremely varied in their construction [5]. A characteristic feature of megalithic tombs is that these were frequented and used permanently and over an extended period of time as collective burial places for the members of a community whilst also serving as venues for ritual acts. Complex patterns of “treating” and “reburying” the skeletal remains have been identified in some megalithic tombs [9]. Skeletal remains are valuable biogenic archives for the study of the human past [10–11]. In this investigation we chose an integrative approach that combined archaeological and anthropological methods to explore the lifestyles and living conditions of the burial community. The osteological findings provided information about the minimum number of individuals (MNI), age, sex, body height, stress markers, diseases, traces of violence, and activity patterns [12–14]. Molecular genetic (mtDNA) data made biological relationships visible and revealed the genetic profile and relations of the individuals buried at Alto de Reinoso with other Iberian and European Neolithic populations [15–16]. Strontium isotope ratios of enamel and bone are geological tracers and were analysed as an indicator of mobility and change of residence [17]. The 87Sr/86Sr ratios of the trace element strontium in bedrock vary according to the kinds and ages of geological units. The biologically available strontium is transferred through the food chain, stored in enamel during tooth development, and remains afterwards unchanged. Under the precondition of consumption of locally produced food, strontium isotope ratios in enamel that differ from the local baselines can identify non-local individuals in burial communities. The light stable isotope ratios of carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N) reflect dietary habits [18]. Isotope fractionation allows for estimations of the proportions of C 3 and C 4 plants in the human diet as well as the contribution of meat, dairy products, or fish. Other studies with a similarly comprehensive approach to reconstructing the past have been published in recent years for different regions and epochs [19–22]. However, similarly extensive presentations of the research results in collective graves are still generally quite rare and completely lacking for Spain [24–25]. The analysis of the skeletal remains from the megalithic tomb at Alto de Reinoso is therefore the most wide-ranging study of the Neolithic in Spain. First of all, it aims to characterise the population group who buried their dead in the megalithic tomb. Did it comprise several generations of a village-like community with a restricted territory and indications of kinship relations, or do the genetic, isotopic, and osteological characteristics point to the presence of people originating from various communities throughout the wider area and/or their mobile lifestyles? What were the specific living conditions of the population, including dietary habits as well as stress due to disadvantageous health conditions or interpersonal violence? Moreover, do the mtDNA data reflect population-dynamic processes over the course of the establishment and consolidation of the Neolithic on the Iberian Peninsula as well as long-distance contact and migration?

The Late Neolithic Site at Alto de Reinoso, Spain The megalithic tomb at Alto de Reinoso is situated in sprawling hills between the villages of Monasterio de Rodilla to the north and Fresno de Rodilla to the south (Province Burgos, northern Spain). Located on a narrow platform in the Paramo highlands, the burial site dominates the entire surrounding area and is placed in a striking topographical location (Fig 1). The tomb is surrounded by the Northern Meseta landscape, a vast plateau in the interior of the Iberian Peninsula. This plateau has an average elevation of 600 to 700 metres and is flanked by mountain ranges that separate it from the coastal regions: in the north by the Cantabrian Mountains (Cordillera Cantabrica), in the north-east by the Iberian Mountains (Sistema Iberico) and in the south by the Central System. Highly diverse landscapes with strong contrasts in altitude within relatively short distances are characteristic of the Iberian Peninsula [26]. PPT PowerPoint slide

PowerPoint slide PNG larger image

larger image TIFF original image Download: Fig 1. Map showing the geographical location of the Alto de Reinoso megalithic tomb in the Burgos province (Castilla y León, Spain) (graphic: Héctor Arcusa Magallón; Copyright by the authors). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146176.g001 The collective tomb had a diameter of approximately three metres and was excavated between 2006 and 2007 by archaeologists from the University of Valladolid, Spain. The primary aim of the rescue excavation was to prevent further destruction of the tomb. Only a few of the stones used in the construction of the mound had been preserved in situ. All the findings made during the excavation suggested that the tomb had originally been some kind of hut constructed in vegetal materials (house of the dead) that was eventually dismantled, closed off and finally turned into a monumental structure by erecting a stone mound above the ossuary (Fig 2). PPT PowerPoint slide

PowerPoint slide PNG larger image

larger image TIFF original image Download: Fig 2. Reconstruction of the original appearance of the megalithic mound of Alto de Reinoso (graphic: Héctor Arcusa Magallón). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146176.g002 The excavators identified three distinct layers in the area of the tomb. The uppermost Bronze Age layer, which had been disturbed by the plough during long-term agricultural activity around the grave in more recent times, contained numerous widely scattered stone remains as well as severely disturbed human bones and grave goods. The skeletal remains of two individuals dating from around 1700–1500 cal BC were found in this layer. These two individuals were not included in the study presented here. The actual Neolithic ossuary containing a surprisingly high density of human bones in two burial layers (top and bottom) of very different states of preservation was discovered beneath this layer. The skeletal remains of the top layer were highly disturbed and included the upper body parts and skull of a male adult (Rein 30) and numerous concentrations of disarticulated human bones: groups of skulls (e.g. the isolated skulls Rein 17 and Rein 23 arranged next to the skull of individual Rein 8; S1 Fig), assemblages of long bones or even skulls intentionally framed by long bones. Most assemblages of skulls and postcranial bones appeared to have been arranged (e.g. Rein 29; see S2 Fig). Furthermore, a huge amount of disarticulated postcranial bones and a number of isolated skeletal parts were found in this layer. Most likely, these were the result of human interference in the context of rituals or were perhaps the result of bone dislocation whilst new bodies were placed in the megalithic tomb. The bottom layer, on the other hand, revealed complete primary burials in situ, which showed hardly any signs of disturbance. It lay directly on the natural bedrock and contained six relatively complete (Rein 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 10) and six half skeletons (Rein 6, 7, 8, 9, 11 and 12) in anatomical order as primary burials (S1 Table and S3 Fig). The individuals had been interred in a crouched position, as it was typical in many Neolithic archaeological contexts [27]: six individuals lay on their left side (Rein 1, 2, 4, 5, 8 and 11) whilst two were found lying on their right side (Rein 3 and 10). However, it was not possible to reconstruct the exact burial sequence of the bodies in the tomb. The skeletal remains had lain relatively undisturbed until being covered by other burials, which provided them with additional protection against relocation. Due to the collective utilisation of the tomb characterised by successive burials whereby older corpses were displaced in favour of more recent ones, individualisation of the human remains was only possible for some of the skeletons. Hence, the reconstruction of the demographic profile of the burial community proved challenging. The archaeological material recovered from inside the ossuary was not overly abundant and included both personal adornments (stone necklace beads, wild boar tusk pendants) and grave goods (polished stone axes, flint blades and microliths, bone spatulae) (S4 Fig). Some had been intentionally deposited beneath or near the skulls (flint blades and stone polished axes). Two bone spatulae, one of which was decorated, and a stone bead had been placed beneath a skull (Rein 29), and it had also been surrounded by a triangular frame consisting of three long bones (see S2 Fig). Small artefacts such as microliths or beads were easily removed and repositioned along with the bones; one exception to this rule was a lignite bead found on the neck of individual Rein 1. Remarkably, there was a distinct lack of ceramic vessels in megalithic tombs, at least during the earlier period of their use. Researchers assume that this was due to ritual reasons [5]. The archaeological material suggested a date for the megalithic tomb at Alto de Reinoso in the Late Neolithic. Overall the finds exhibited strong chronological coherence and were all artefacts typically found in megalithic tombs throughout the Meseta during the 4th millennium BC. Radiocarbon dates were obtained from three human bone samples recovered from different layers in the ossuary, giving a maximum chronological range of between 3770 and 3539 (2 sigma cal BC) (S2 Table). The OxCal v4.2.4 software [28] allowed us to narrow down the actual time span represented by the radiocarbon dates to a period of 60 to 80 years, or roughly three generations (S2 Table and S5 Fig). Both the archaeological finds and the radiocarbon dates are characteristic of collective burials from the Late Neolithic [5]. In principle, we may state that collective burials were abundant at the beginning of the 4th millennium BC and exhibited diverse architecture ranging from simple non megalithic barrows, that is to say lacking colossal stone structures, to large passage graves as simple dolmens and allées couvertes [29]. Alto de Reinoso is a good example of a non-megalithic barrow, as the result of the monumentalization of a more basic structure, probably a burial chamber made of wood, mud and other organic materials, the actual shape of which is difficult to ascertain. This structure was finally dismantled as part of a closure ritual, and then marked and monumentalised by erecting a small stone barrow covering the remains of the ossuary [30]. Where a tomb had once stood, a monument to the memory of the ancestors was now erected as a permanent reference to their presence in the symbolic and cultural landscape. Similar examples of this type of monument have been discovered at La Tarayuela (Ambrona Valley, Soria) and at El Castillejo [31].

Materials and Methods This study deals with archaeological skeletal material and adheres to the Helsinki Declaration on Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. The excavation licenses were issued by the General Director of Cultural Heritage of the Junta de Castilla y Léon (Spain) and are stored in its archives. Following excavation campaigns 2006/2007, the skeletons were transferred to the former Bioarchaeology group at the University of Mainz, Germany for investigation. At present all archaeological remains, including the human bones, recovered at the site of Alto de Reinoso, are stored in the Prehistory and Archaeology lab of the University of Valladolid. The inventory list of the bones in their current storage place is identical to the list supplied in S1 Table of the supplemental information. A basic concern of anthropological examination of human remains from megalithic monuments is the dense occupation of the tombs both by completely preserved individuals and partial burials as well as isolated bones. One of the preconditions of investigating the demographic structure of a burial community is the analysis of the minimum number of individuals (MNI) which serves as a starting point for all further studies including osteological determination of age and sex, reconstruction of body height, investigation of diseases, trauma and stress markers as well as molecular genetics and isotope analysis. The techniques used in this interdisciplinary integrative study were based on established methods and these are described in the supporting material (S1 Text). A varying number of individuals were available for each section of the examination, depending on the part of the skeleton required to carry out the analysis (Table 1 and S1 Table). PPT PowerPoint slide

PowerPoint slide PNG larger image

larger image TIFF original image Download: Table 1. Results of osteological, mtDNA and isotopic analysis for the human individuals from Alto de Reinoso. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146176.t001 In order to reproduce the aDNA results, two or three samples were taken from each of the available individuals (n = 27) for molecular genetics analyses. We generated mitochondrial profiles by analysing the hypervariable regions I and II (HVR I, HVR II) and coding region single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the mitochondrial genome (S7, S8 and S9 Tables). Protocols for sample preparations, extraction, amplification setups, and contamination control were applied as described previously [15, 16, 22, 32]. During genetic sample preparation, the tooth enamel—which is not required for molecular analyses—was separated from the dentine and passed on to undergo strontium isotope analysis. This investigation was based on 36 enamel samples from the permanent dentition of 19 individuals. In most cases both an early and a late mineralising tooth were sampled from each individual in order to gain information on potential changes of residence during childhood. Individuals whose bones were too poorly preserved to determine their sex and age at death were excluded from the sampling process. The analytical procedure included the mechanical abrasion of all surfaces and remaining dentine, chemical cleaning with buffered acetic acid, ashing, strontium separation with Eichrom Sr-Spec resin and determination of Sr concentrations with a Quadrupole-Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometer (Q-ICP-MS) and the 87Sr/86Sr ratios with a Multi Collector-ICP-MS (VG Axiom) at the Curt Engelhorn Centre Archaeometry gGmbH in Mannheim, Germany following the procedures described in Knipper et al. [33]. Details on sample preparation and analyses are given in S1 Text. In addition to the tooth samples, three human bones from the grave and two samples from domestic cattle (Bos taurus) also derived from the grave provided comparative data for the interpretation of the 87Sr/86Sr ratios. During the osteological examination bone samples were also taken for collagen extraction with the aim of analysing the carbon and nitrogen isotope ratios (δ13C and δ15N) in both humans (n = 29) and animals, including cattle (Bos taurus) and a rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) (n = 4). The taphonomic alterations of the rabbit bone suggest that it belonged to the same burial context and time period as the human remains. The analytical procedure included mechanical cleaning, demineralization, removal of humic acids, gelatinization, filtration, concentration of the long-chained collagen by ultrafiltration and lyophilisation [22]. The carbon and nitrogen contents were determined by an elemental analyzer (vario EL III, Elementar Analytical Systems) and the isotope ratios by an IsoPrime High Performance isotope ratio mass spectrometer (IRMS; VG Instruments) at the Department of Organic Chemistry at the University of Mainz. More information on sample preparation and analysis is given in S1 Text. The sampled skeletal remains were given laboratory assignations ranging from Rein 1 to Rein 33 (Table 1 and S1 Table). In cases where sampling was not possible the bones were only listed with an inventory number (Inv.). Isolated postcranial bones are not listed, but recorded under its inventory number.

Integrative Analysis and Interpretation Because of its remote elevated location (Meseta) the economy at Alto de Reinoso would have been characterised by small-scale farming and herding. The economic subsistence and the remote geographical location would obviously be reflected in the results. Moreover, the short period of use of the tomb and the preservation of the skeletal remains, which was of a sufficient quality for most of the analyses carried out, provided an opportunity to generate scientific data that would allow us to ascertain whether the subsistence conditions had had an impact on the social structure within the community, what it could have looked like and what dynamics may have developed. Besides the standard osteological methods to reconstruct the fundamental “biographical” data, this approach requires the use of modern methods of analysis, several of which were in fact employed in this study. Megalithic tombs—human connections in life and in death How prehistoric communities dealt with death is reflected in predetermined communal rituals. These also incorporated the place where the dead were laid to rest. The Neolithic megalithic tombs in Europe represent a particular type of collective burial. Compared to individual graves in a cemetery, the communal use of a “house of the dead” more clearly illustrates the bond within a community where the individual is not at the forefront, in life or in death [112]. It was not until the Chalcolithic period and the Bronze Age that social differentiation increased and individuals and groups came to the fore more and more clearly [113]. According to the archaeological finds and features as well as the radiocarbon dates the collective tomb was used by a small farming community for a period of three generations at most (generation = 25 years). This rather short period of use appears typical of the megalithic ossuaries in the Iberian interior, as seen at La Tarayuela, La Velilla, La Sima (especially phase II), La Vega and Los Zumacales [5]; all these tombs were used by only a few generations (no more than four). Given the estimated period of use, the MNI calculated at 47 for Alto de Reinoso suggests that an average of one or two people died every year; this number would include infants, which were largely absent. The MNI is within the range typically observed at Neolithic megalithic tombs situated relatively close to Alto de Reinoso such as La Peña de la Abuela [114], La Sima [115] and La Tarayuela [116], and also at other Spanish sites further afield such as San Juan ante Portam Latinam [62] in the Basque country, Cerro Virtud in Almeria [117] and Cueva de Malalmuerzo in Andalucia [118] and at Late Neolithic sites in Portugal [119]. All the data and findings generated at Alto de Reinoso in relation to the tomb, its size, the number of burials and its period of use attest to relatively uniform funerary rites at that time in the Meseta and (in some cases far) beyond. Is the demographic composition of the community representative? From the point of view of palaeodemographics a skeletal sample is considered representative if the adults exhibit a natural stratification regarding age and sex distribution and if the proportion of infants is not below 20% due to the high mortality rates of children under 1 year [120–121]. Because the data gathered at Alto de Reinoso did not fulfil these criteria, the sample would at first glance not be deemed representative. The percentages of adults and subadults at Alto de Reinoso were offset in favour of the adults because the infants and small children in particular were clearly underrepresented (S3 Table). The lack of bones of the age group infans I can generally be attributed to taphonomic processes, particularly in collective burials, where a lot of disturbance occurs over their period of use. At Alto de Reinoso the group was represented by individual bones but could not be accounted for as a whole. In a comparative study on the demographic structures in megalithic graves in northern Spain Fernández-Crespo and de-la-Rúa [122] presented results similar to those found at Alto de Reinoso with a shortage of children less than five years, although they also pointed to examples of a lack of mature and senile adults. However, compared to Cerro Virtud [117], La Peña de la Abuela [114], La Tarayuela [116] and La Sima [114] the tomb at Alto de Reinoso contained more children and adolescents, whilst yielding fewer compared to San Juan ante Portam Latinam [62] and Cueva de Malalmuerzo [118]. The age determinations yielded mainly adolescents (n = 8) and young adults (n = 12), whilst older adults (> 41 y) were underrepresented. However, taking into account the adults whose ages could not be ascertained (n = 7) could potentially increase the number of mature individuals. The ratio of sexes which favoured the males (determination based on crania) was put into perspective by the examinations of the pelvic bones which indicated a rather more equal distribution (S4 Table). Therefore, the predominance of males in megalithic graves as has been suggested due to comparable data gathered at Cerro Virtud [117], La Peña de la Abuela [114], La Tarayuela [116] and San Juan ante Portam Latinam [62] was not observed at Alto de Reinoso. The idea of the predominance of males was already discredited elsewhere [122]. Based on the Las Arnillas dolmen where more males than females were identified Delibes de Castro argued for a possible social relegation of women [123]. He believed that, besides problems linked to pregnancy and childbirth, women may have had a lower life expectancy due to social discrimination, which could perhaps even have impacted on their diet. The striking lack of skulls can again be explained by taphonomic processes. Some of them were found as part of groupings with isolated long bones elsewhere in the tomb which, however, does not explain the shortfall. We would suspect that skulls were removed from the tomb, perhaps as part of ritual acts within the context of ancestor worship. The fact that children and young adults would not be considered ancestors could explain the relative underrepresentation of older individuals in the tomb. Numerous examples of ancestor worship using skulls in pars pro toto ceremonies are known from the Neolithic period [124–128]. The structure and dynamics of the community at Alto de Reinoso The best way to answer questions regarding the social structure and potential dynamics within the Alto de Reinoso community, beyond the demographic data, is to study the molecular profiles. Taking into account the MNI, the number of burials in the two layers and its period of use, the bottom layer probably contained one generation, whilst the top layer is more likely to have included members of two generations. This means that all individuals from the same layer were separated by one generation at most. Reproducible genetic profiles were generated for 9 individuals from the bottom layer and 17 individuals from the top layer. The fact that, according to the molecular genetic analyses, 15 of the individuals buried at Alto de Reinoso shared their mtDNA haplotypes with at least one other person is not surprising given the limited size of the community, nor should it come as a surprise that pairs of individuals with identical haplotypes were found buried directly beside each other in the less disturbed part of the tomb, which suggests very close genetic relations (Fig 3). The fact that shared maternal lineages generally occurred between individuals within both layers and also between individuals from different layers is population-biological evidence for a certain degree of continuity within the group. On the other hand, some of the genetic profiles only occurred in one of the layers. One could argue that the lineages that were especially frequent at Alto de Reinoso—mainly of haplogroups K and T2—were also identified at other Neolithic sites in Spain (Cova d´Avellaner, Can Sadurní, San Pau de Camp, and Chaves; [74,77]) and therefore perhaps simply reflect common Neolithic lineages instead of mitochondrial kinship. However, these lineages were not identified as frequently by any of the prehistoric aDNA studies carried out elsewhere and the rCRS lineage of haplogroup V (Rein 6 and 9) was exclusively found at Alto de Reinoso. The fact that a total of six different mitochondrial lineages occur in two or three individuals argues against random haplotype matches and for the existence of maternal kinship among the individuals buried at Alto de Reinoso. Given the period of use of the tomb one would not expect more than two or three members of any particular nuclear family to have been buried in the tomb, and these may represent successive generations. In summary, the overall picture is that of a closely related community that did not experience any noteworthy changes over the period of time the collective tomb was in use. The absence of dynamic changes within the group is further confirmed by the 87Sr/86Sr isotope ratios. There was no clear evidence pointing to non-local individuals from distinctly different geological areas. In examining the dataset as a whole, one of the striking features is that three of four individuals with a slightly divergent Sr isotope pattern compared to the remainder of the population (Rein 3, 23 and 30), had genetic profiles that did not have any parallels in the collective burial (Fig 5), despite the fact that numerous haplotypes were represented at the site. The lack of evidence regarding to biological relations between these three individuals and the other members of the community supports the assumption that they had come from elsewhere. The isotope ratios in the late mineralising tooth crowns of Rein 3 and Rein 30 were equivalent to the local baseline, which means that if there had been a change of location it would have occurred during their childhood. The individuals with identical haplotypes, on the other hand, largely yielded Sr isotope ratios typical of the locality and very slight differences between the 87Sr/86Sr ratios in the earlier and later mineralised teeth, which both argues against residential changes. This further confirms the notion of a closely related community, several generations of which sourced their food from geologically uniform economic areas. One possible exception was the 16–20 year-old male individual Rein 5 (hg T2b) with 87Sr/86Sr ratios typical of the locality in the first permanent molar, whilst the second permanent molar yielded the lowest Sr isotope ratio of the entire dataset. Whilst it is quite possible that the individual was born locally, he may have lived with a different community for some of his childhood. However, due to the only slight difference in the 87Sr/86Sr ratios of both teeth and the small number of comparable samples it must be emphasised that this is only one possible interpretation. The Sr isotope ratios overall paint a picture of the funerary site at Alto de Reinoso as a largely closed community within which (long-distance) mobility probably played a rather insignificant role. Because the sample only included a small number of females, no definitive conclusions could be drawn with regard to the rules of residence (matri- or patrilocality). Alto de Reinoso in view of the Western and Central European Neolithic population and settlement history It is widely accepted that the Neolithic spread to the Iberian Peninsula from the Near East via the Mediterranean route [129]. Dependent on the Mesolithic background, there is, however, considerable variation with regard to the acceptance of pioneer farmers and the assimilation of autochthonous hunter-gatherers in different areas of Spain and Portugal. Because Western and Central Europe differ both in the beginning of the Neolithic and in the admixture of the first farmers, it is essential to analyze sites from various regions [86]. General statements concerning the settlement and population history of Europe can only be reached in comparison. When compared to other Neolithic groups on the Iberian Peninsula, the haplogroup composition of the Alto de Reinoso site showed close similarity to the Early and Middle Neolithic of Central Europe. (S11 and S12 Tables). Most interestingly, Middle to Late Neolithic groups in north Spain (NS_MLN) located in the Upper Ebro and Ambrona Valley [76,86] and Alto de Reinoso—though situated in close geographical proximity—showed essential differences at the mitochondrial level (see PCA, Fig 4). The haplogroup composition in north Spain (NS_EN and NS_MLN) appears to have remained relatively unchanged over the course of the Neolithic and a great many haplogroups typical of south-western hunter-gatherer populations (H, U, U5b) still existed in the area. On the other hand, a much greater number of “Neolithic haplogroups” (e.g. J, K, T2, and X) were present in the Early Neolithic north-east Spain, at Alto de Reinoso, and at the nearby Chalcolithic El Mirador site [75] arguing for an influx of Near Eastern Neolithic lineages from north-eastern Spain into the northern Meseta during the Early and Middle Neolithic. The results point to different population-dynamic processes in these regions in the latter stages of the Neolithic period. This stands in contrast to genetic data obtained in Central Europe, where populations seem to have remained rather uniform in their mitochondrial composition during the Early and Middle Neolithic [16,21,86]. The subsistence and dietary data confirm the impression of a closely related community Overall, the stable carbon and nitrogen values show that all the members of the community consumed a very similar diet, again confirming the impression of a largely homogenous community. The evidence supporting this assumption is low standard deviations of 0.3 ‰ in δ13C and 0.4 ‰ in δ15N [130]. The dietary evidence points exclusively to C 3 plants and a slightly higher consumption of meat and dairy products or increased fertilisation of the farmland compared to contemporaneous cultural groups in Central Europe [131–133]. Increased fertilisation is less likely to occur in the keeping of smaller ruminants due to their usually higher mobility than in cattle and pig farming. Whilst at that time cattle and pigs were predominant in Central Europe, sheep and goats were the preferred sources of food in south-western Europe, where pigs and cattle were rarely part of the diet up to the Late Neolithic [105–106]. Furthermore there were no relevant differences in the consumption of food between the sexes or the different age groups within the community. Due to the lack of grave goods, which also underlines the impression of an egalitarian group, any social differentiation between the individuals could be excluded. Though not statistically verified, the females at Alto de Reinoso tended to yield lower nitrogen isotope values than the males (with values more than 0.2 ‰ lower being outside of the range which could be explained by analytical error; Fig 6). Moreover, the data of seven individuals from the top layer were somewhat set apart from the main data cluster due to more negative carbon isotope values (Rein 28, 28/2, 29–33). The lower carbon values could have been the result of different carbon sources in the diet, for example due to the consumption of animals and plants from wooded areas with a distinct canopy [134–135]. It is worth noting that all these individuals were from the final phase of use of the megalithic tomb. Besides climate change, which is difficult to identify in short-term variation, other possible reasons for the lower carbon values could have been changes in the subsistence economy such as an increase in legumes whose cultivation requires rather more shaded locations. The data of two individuals (Rein 29 and 32) differ from those of the others by lower carbon and higher nitrogen isotope values. The latter could have been as a result of an increased consumption of animal protein including freshwater fish [136]. Compared to most other sites in Spain, Portugal, and the South of France for which nutritional data are available the nitrogen isotope values at Alto de Reinoso were higher (Fig 6). The only site showing higher δ15N value was the Mesolithic site at El Collado near Valencia. However, this site was located on the Spanish Mediterranean coast and the high nitrogen isotope values were probably a result of the consumption of marine fish [137]. The values of Alto de Reinoso are better comparable to late Neolithic data from the Garonne area in the South of France [138]. In this case researchers interpreted the relatively high nitrogen isotope values as the result of a high consumption of animal protein or as a consequence of fertilising practices, and this may also have applied to Alto de Reinoso. Another reason for increased nitrogen values at Alto de Reinoso could have been the aridity in the Meseta compared to other regions on the Iberian Peninsula and in the South of France [111]. The carbon isotope values measured at Alto de Reinoso were similar to those from the Late Neolithic site of Cova de la Pastora [139] in Spain, from Neolithic sites in Portugal (Casa da Moura, Gruta do Caldeirao, Gruta da Feteira, Gruta da Fontainhas, Roche Forte II, Cerca do Zambujal, Melides; [140]) and Late Neolithic sites in the Languedoc area of France [138].

Conclusion Methodologically comprehensive and impressively supported by a multitude of results, the study is the first of its kind to provide a more in-depth understanding of the living environment of a burial community such as this. The bioarchaeological data generated have thus allowed us to go beyond the most important individual data such as age and sex and to trace biographical details including familial kinship relations, to reconstruct dietary habits and to highlight patterns of mobility and migration within the region and beyond. Some 50 deceased found their final resting place in the tomb. Based on radiocarbon dates we may state that they covered two or three generations and some of them exhibited close genetic similarities. As shown by the mtDNA profiles the community was composed of a series of independent familial groups whose members generally grew up in the vicinity of Alto de Reinoso. The demographic and genetic composition of the burial community and the reconstruction of its lifestyles and dietary habits, supported by the funerary rites, paint a picture of a close-knit local community whose subsistence was based on farming. With regard to their origins and ancestry the farmers buried at Alto de Reinoso exhibited mainly early farming genetic component, introduced during the Neolithisation of the Iberian Peninsula by immigrants from the Near East, as it is typically seen on the north-eastern part of Spain and in Central Europe. However, a smaller proportion of hunter-gatherer genetic legacy is also reflected in the maternal genetic composition of the population buried at Alto de Reinoso. The number of bioarchaeological analyses has increased considerably in recent years [141–142], although it is still quite rare to find a study that combines a multitude of available scientific methods [20,22–23]. The often inadequate social-historical interpretation of such data must, however, be optimised at a meta-level, which will require an even more intensive discourse with archaeological research. For instance the fact that, as today, the societal conditions and social relationships were not necessarily always stable in the past, is often not taken into account. Therefore, we should generally assume that biographies included times of crisis, upheaval and social dislocation and both individuals and communities as a whole were continuously forced to adapt to changing social circumstances. From the point of view of the data generated, however, no particularly unusual individual situations or substantial group-dynamic breaks could be identified that would have impacted on the population of Alto de Reinoso.

Acknowledgments We thank Willi Dindorf and Sabine Moeller-Rieker (University of Mainz), Sigrid Klaus, Michael Brauns and Bernd Höppner (Curt-Engelhorn-Centre Archaeometry gGmbH Mannheim) as well as Bernd Kromer, Susanne Lindauer, Robin van Gyseghem and Ute Blach (Klaus-Tschira Archaeometry Centre at the Curt-Engelhorn-Centre Archaeometry Mannheim) for technical assistance for the preparation of samples and for conducting measurements, Sandy Haemmerle (prehistrans) for language editing, and Sandra Pichler (Integrative Prehistory and Archaeological Science, Basel, Switzerland) and the anonymous reviewers for comments that greatly improved the manuscript.

Author Contributions Conceived and designed the experiments: KWA MARG RGP. Performed the experiments: KWA CK PH CR DN. Analyzed the data: KWA ASN CR PH CK SZ MARG RGP HAM. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: KWA MARG RGP CTR IGML HAM. Wrote the paper: KWA CK MARG RGP PH ASN CR SZ. Participated in the excavation: MARG CTR IGML. Provided ancient samples, contextual information, and access to unpublished archaeological data: MARG RGP CTR IGML HAM. Provided input on the manuscript: CTR IGML HAM.