There’s been a lot of silly talk lately about “punching Nazis.” Too much. And in most cases it’s coming from uneducated people who have no idea who Nazis actually were. They get their knowledge of Nazi history and policy from comic books and movies. They see Brad Pitt in Inglorious Basterds talking about punching Nazis and they want to live out that fantasy. Others watch Hellboy and Iron Sky and feel that gives them enough information to know what a Nazi is and was.

It makes SJWs feel like they’re heroes fighting villains in a comic book or movie. But of course it’s all pure delusion.

Now don’t get me wrong, Indiana Jones movies are some of my favorites. And comic books are fun. I’m going to be reading Ethan Van Sciver’s #CyberFrog soon, which I’m really looking forward to.

But we have to understand that comic books and movies depict caricatures of much more complex scenarios. For instance, The Last Crusade depicted the Nazis as book burners, when in fact it was German student activists who actually did the book burning. Movies and comic books are fun, and I enjoy them too, but they’re poor substitutes for learning history the old fashioned way: by reading lots and lots of dusty old history books and long form articles. Movies and comic books just don’t cut it.

I’m always hesitant to post very long blogs of this nature, because the modern SJW has been trained to label citation of basic history as a “conspiracy theory.” But since Godwin’s Law has seemingly been discarded in favor of the desire to punch a Nazi, I think it’s important to take some time here to take a really good long thoughtful look at just who and what the Nazis actually were. So grab a cup of tea and your favorite barkalounger. This is going to be a long one.

There is far too much text here for the average SJW to read. Or bring up these points to your professor or in your next big paper that you have to write. It will piss off your professor for certain, in fact it will make them positively incandescent. But in time you may come to enjoy your idiot professor’s anger as entertaining theater, as I once did.

So it will be up to you to bring up these points a la carte in your own arguments. This is all basic history that is freely available to anyone willing to put forth the effort to read in many different places. Don’t take anything for granted though. Confirm the information in this blog post with your own research.

Some of the citation links may be broken or outdated, but a determined scholar will likely be able to find them through the Wayback Machine.

This blog post too will be hosted via the Wayback Machine right here. And at archive.today right here.

“Many who think themselves infinitely superior to the aberrations of Nazism, and sincerely hate all manifestations, work at the same time for ideals whose realization would lead straight to the abhorred tyranny.” ~ F.A. Hayek

Nazis were Leftist Socialists

Nazis. The National Socialist German Worker’s Party. It’s right there in their name. It seems like it would be pretty cut and dry, that leftist socialists, calling themselves socialists, claiming to be socialists, publishing propagandist marketing material promoting socialism, and advancing socialist policies, would in fact be socialists. Logically, limited government, free markets, deregulation, freedom of speech, religious freedom, and firearms ownership don’t really come to mind when discussing Nazi Germany or fascism in general. But somehow, the revisionist notion that Nazis were right-wingers became conventional wisdom. A conventional wisdom which seems to be based on little more than the fact that Nazis had short hair cuts, starched collars, and good personal hygiene.

But the advent of the internet made rediscovery of the Nazis’ socialist roots easier than ever, so a new myth had to be born which says that the Nazis were merely pretending to be socialists just to gain the popular vote from the worker class for Hitler, due to the usefulness of socialism’s sterling reputation, or something. Some amusingly say that the Nazis were capitalists despite Hitler openly citing capitalists as enemies. Some try to excuse Hitler’s provable connection with socialism as some sort of political schizophrenia and opportunism.

Others stupidly contend that Nazis couldn’t be socialists, because they were in conflict with other socialists. Some misunderstand Hitler’s criticism of Marxists and socialists as anti-Marxism and anti-socialism. Others erroneously contend that socialism and nationalism are mutually exclusive. But socialists fight among themselves between different socialist factions all of the time, as is evidenced in the conflict between Fabian Socialists (reform socialists), and Marxist Socialists (revolutionary socialists). In reality Nazism represented the emergence of a third strain of the socialist virus; National Socialism. Reich Minister of Propaganda in Nazi Germany Joseph Goebbels wrote:

“We are socialists because we see in socialism, that is the union of all citizens, the only chance to maintain our racial inheritance and to regain our political freedom and renew our German state. “The sin of liberal thinking was to overlook socialism’s nation-building strengths, thereby allowing its energies to go in anti-national directions. The sin of Marxism was to degrade socialism into a question of wages and the stomach, putting it in conflict with the state and its national existence. An understanding of both these facts leads us to a new sense of socialism, which sees its nature as nationalistic, state-building, liberating and constructive.



“We are socialists because we see the social question as a matter of necessity and justice for the very existence of a state for our people, not a question of cheap pity or insulting sentimentality. The worker has a claim to a living standard that corresponds to what he produces. We have no intention of begging for that right. Incorporating him in the state organism is not only a critical matter for him, but for the whole nation. The question is larger than the eight-hour day. It is a matter of forming a new state consciousness that includes every productive citizen. Since the political powers of the day are neither willing nor able to create such a situation, socialism must be fought for. It is a fighting slogan both inwardly and outwardly. It is aimed domestically at the bourgeois parties and Marxism at the same time, because both are sworn enemies of the coming workers’ state. It is directed abroad at all powers that threaten our national existence and thereby the possibility of the coming socialist national state.”

Goebbels also wrote:

Some argue that the existence of private ownership and corporatism in Nazi Germany discredits Nazis’ claims of being socialists. But Hitler was a pragmatist when it came to his position on private ownership. He used private ownership to his benefit when the creative competition and technical innovation helped his cause. However, he would insist that private corporations bend to the will of the state if they were to be “productive” rather than “parasitical.” National Socialists did indeed believe in limited private ownership when it benefited the state, but Nazi Germany never had genuine capitalism, and enacted numerous policies to suppress it. Nazi theologian Gregor Strasser stated:

Leonard Peikoff writes:

“Contrary to the Marxists, the Nazis did not advocate public ownership of the means of production. They did demand that the government oversee and run the nation’s economy. The issue of legal ownership, they explained, is secondary; what counts is the issue of CONTROL. Private citizens, therefore, may continue to hold titles to property — so long as the state reserves to itself the unqualified right to regulate the use of their property.”

Additionally, Hitler himself credited the philosophy of Karl Marx with the founding of National Socialism:

His private conversations, however, though they do not overturn his reputation as an anti-Communist, qualify it heavily. Hermann Rauschning, for example, a Danzig Nazi who knew Hitler before and after his accession to power in 1933, tells how in private Hitler acknowledged his profound debt to the Marxian tradition. “I have learned a great deal from Marxism” he once remarked, “as I do not hesitate to admit”. He was proud of a knowledge of Marxist texts acquired in his student days before the First World War and later in a Bavarian prison, in 1924, after the failure of the Munich putsch. The trouble with Weimar Republic politicians, he told Otto Wagener at much the same time, was that “they had never even read Marx”, implying that no one who had failed to read so important an author could even begin to understand the modern world; in consequence, he went on, they imagined that the October revolution in 1917 had been “a private Russian affair”, whereas in fact it had changed the whole course of human history! His differences with the communists, he explained, were less ideological than tactical. German communists he had known before he took power, he told Rauschning, thought politics meant talking and writing. They were mere pamphleteers, whereas “I have put into practice what these peddlers and pen pushers have timidly begun”, adding revealingly that “the whole of National Socialism” was based on Marx.

So we know that Hitler’s beef with Bolsheviks and communists was one of methodology rather than ideology, and the economics of Nazi Germany confirm this. There is no record of what Hitler thought of Karl Marx’s Jewish heritage and German Supremacy viewpoints, but assertions that Hitler and the Nazis were right-wing, also ignore the eugenics-centric ideological inspiration, praise, support, and collaboration that they received from contemporary socialists such as George Bernard Shaw and Margaret Sanger, both of whom shared the same belief in eugenics that would inspire in the Holocaust. If the Nazis were truly right-wing, then wouldn’t fellow euthanasia enthusiasts and Fabian Socialists like George Bernard Shaw and Margaret Sanger have expressed an immediate visceral opposition to them?

Socialist George Bernard Shaw praised the Rise of Hitler

Fabian socialist and eugenicist George Bernard Shaw gave praise to socialist dictators, and did not distinguish Hitler as different from them, but rather included him with them:

Fabian socialist George Bernard Shaw also offered suggestions to fellow eugenicists:

Fabian socialist George Bernard Shaw also had nice things to say about the Nazi Party:

Margaret Sanger Inspired Hitler

SJW folk hero Margaret Sanger was impressed by Nazi policy no doubt because they resembled a proposed federal law that she herself had written previously:

Margaret Sanger wanted “feeble-minded persons” to be “isolated” through segregation:

How would this segregation be achieved? What place or facility would these feeble-minded be segregated to? Given their parallels in common thinking, we can look to Nazi Germany’s Final Solution for a potential answer:

Now, some try to excuse Margaret Sanger’s eugenics enthusiasm by attempting to parse good eugenics from bad eugenics, and highlight her experience with the poor as some sort of meaningful context. Others dismiss such criticisms as generic Nazification of political opponents. But Margaret Sanger’s deep involvement in the founding of the National Society for the Legalization of Euthanasia, not to mention her glowing admiration of fellow eugenicist George Bernard Shaw, bespeaks of more than just concern for the poor. Indeed, it demonstrates a woman who was keenly interested in exterminating whomever she didn’t care for. Just like Hitler.

Hitler was the follower, the groupie. Margaret Sanger was the star, the brainchild. So the Holocaust at least in part sprang from the mind of Margaret Sanger. Hitler just put her concepts into practice.

Margaret Sanger Collaborated with a Nazi Supporter and a Nazi

In the 1930s eugenicist Margaret Sanger invited Harvard graduate Dr. Lothrop Stoddard onto the board of directors of the American Birth Control League, which would later change its name to Planned Parenthood. Stoddard wrote the 1920 book The Rising Tide of Color Against White World-Supremacy, in which he writes:

“That is the exact alternative that confronts the white race. . . . If white civilization goes down, the white race is irretrievably ruined. It will be swamped by the triumphant colored races, who will eliminate the white man by elimination or absorption. . . . We now know that men are not and never will be equal. Just as we isolate bacterial invasions, and starve out the bacteria, by limiting the area and amount of their food supply, so we can compel an inferior race to remain in its native habitat.” “Non-white races must be excluded from America … The red and black races if left to themselves revert to a savage or semi-savage stage in a short time.”

In Negro Equality Lothrop wrote in 1927:

“The basic reason for White America’s attitude and policy toward the Negro is, — not a belief in the Negro’s inferiority, — but the fact of his difference. True, most Whites to-day believe the Negro to be their inferior. Yet this belief is, in itself, no mere arbitrary prejudice. “And the overwhelming weight of both historical and scientific evidence shows that only so long as the American people remains White will its institutions, ideals, and culture continue to fit the temperament of its inhabitants, — and hence continue to endure. Therefore, if we desire to perpetuate our America, we White Americans must absolutely refuse to countenance the spread through our stock of racial strains so different and so numerous that they would undermine our ethnic foundations. In other words, we are dealing, not with opinions concerning relative racial merits or demerits, but with an imperative urge of self-preservation. And self-preservation is the first law of nature.”

In 1939 Lothrop met with Adolf Hitler and Heinrich Himmler.

So the notion that Margaret Sanger’s work inspired the Holocaust is more than mere hyperbole. Though Lothrop tried to express that Nazi Germany’s methods were too severe, he felt that their ideals were justified. In fact,

Adolf Hitler’s director of genetic sterilization and co-founder of the Nazi Society for Racial Hygiene Dr. Ernst Rüdin, penned an article for the April 1933 issue of Margaret Sanger’s Birth Control Review periodical. In it he wrote:

“My experience has led me to the conclusion that systematic and careful propaganda should be undertaken where sterilization is advisable. In my view we should act without delay Not only is it our task to prevent the multiplication of bad stocks, it is also to preserve the well endowed stocks and to increase the birth rate of the sound average population.”

Hitler Forced Workers onto Public Unions

One of the talking points that SJWs to mischaracterize Nazis as right-wing, is that “Hitler killed the unions.” So if Hitler killed the unions, then he must be right-wing. Did Hitler kill the unions? Why yes, he did.

Upon gaining power in 1933 he disbanded the Weimar Trade Unions; free and diverse private unions. He outlawed these unions because many of them were run by Jews. Union leaders were arrested and money belonging to the unions was confiscated. But that’s only half of the story.

As Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf:

I think that I have already answered the first question adequately. In the present state of affairs I am convinced that we cannot possibly dispense with the trade unions. On the contrary, they are among the most important institutions in the economic life of the nation. Not only are they important in the sphere of social policy but also, and even more so, in the national political sphere. For when the great masses of a nation see their vital needs satisfied through a just trade unionist movement the stamina of the whole nation in its struggle for existence will be enormously reinforced thereby. Before everything else, the trades unions are necessary as building stones for the future economic parliament, which will be made up of chambers representing the various professions and occupations.

So Hitler needed to replace the Weimar Trade Unions. After disbanding and outlawing the private Weimar Trade Unions, Hitler then directly proceeded to force all workers onto the German Labor Front which consisted of two branches; the National Socialist Factory Organization and the National Socialist Trade and Industry Organization. These were public unions which were used to expand the power of the state. Strikes and collective bargaining would subsequently be banned by the Nazis, since they would effectively stand as protests against the state. That’s the half of the story that never gets told in the “Hitler killed the unions too” parrotings.

German Student Activists Burned Books

Many call refer to these events as Nazi book burnings, but that’s not technically true. It was German university student activists who primarily burned the books.

In 1933 student activists at German universities organized book burnings in order to purge an “un-German spirit.” As part of this purge, books written by Jewish authors were sought out for the burnings in what Josephs Goebbels called, “the right to clean up the debris of the past.” Let the past die indeed. Many intellectuals fled Germany in response to this barbaric attack on intellectual freedom.

In 1939, Margaret Sanger claimed that her books were among those that had been burned. She wrote:

These claims stretch the boundary of believability however. Remember, Margaret Sanger collaborated with Nazis and Nazi supporters in her own publications, and on the board of her “committee” such as Lothrop Stoddard. Furthermore, as previously demonstrated, Margaret Sanger’s own work in Eugenics inspired the Holocaust.

So the claim that Sanger’s books were targeted for burning is fishy at best.

In the early 21st Century, there are two primary events that American students are engaged in, that are analogous to the German university student book burnings.

The first is known as Positive Jamming. This is where an online mob organizes, usually comprising of university student activists, and aggressively overwhelms an online forum with their messaging. It can also take the form of barraging blog posts or websites with reports of inappropriate content. Either way, its intent is to shut down and silence discussion that is not explicitly approved by their collective. However this digital tactic sometimes spills over into the real world. Students also protest public speakers by yelling and chanting so as to drown the speaker out, sometimes storming the stage to present their own uneducated speeches and signage.

The second is eschewing of books written by “white men” which will likely become policy in the academic field if it isn’t already. Remember, whether the concept is white supremacy or white privilege is irrelevant. Both are merely two sides of the same coin; a deeply sick obsession with the artificial divisions of race.

The nonsense concepts of hate speech, safe spaces, free speech zones, speech codes, trigger warnings, checking privileges, and micro-aggressions, all serve to create an anti-educational environment for the modern Snowflake Generation. This facilitates the same kind of speech intolerance that led German college students to burn books in the 1930s, and is now leading progressive tech giants to unperson Alex Jones. The only question is, who’s next?

Hitler Pursued a Prohibition on Tobacco

Even though Adolf Hitler himself smoked two packs a day as an aspiring artist in his youth, he reportedly despised smoking after he quit, which naturally meant that he was then compelled to force all of Germany to quit. After the Nazis rose to power, they banned smoking in public places such as movie theaters, government offices, retirement homes, college campuses, public transportation, restaurants, cafes, bars, air raid shelters, hospitals, and workplaces. They even called for a ban on smoking while driving. They heavily regulated the tobacco industry. Exorbitant taxes on tobacco accounted for a twelfth of Germany’s tax revenue. Advertising of smoking products was banned. Children under 18 were banned from smoking. They launched an aggressive anti-smoking campaign under the aegis of racial hygiene and public health. They used pseudoscience to suggest that smoking caused spontaneous abortions in women. Hitler was reported to have discussed banning tobacco altogether after the war.

However the smoking rate rose in Germany anyway more than it ever did before, suggesting that the Nazi anti-smoking campaign was as counter productive as the American Prohibition on alcohol. If it weren’t for the massive unpopularity of the disastrous American Prohibition, similar anti-smoking measures likely would have been pursued under Liberal Democratic President FDR.

Hitler and the Nazis Hated Christianity Too

One of the ways that modern SJWs like to mischaracterize Nazis as right wing, is to erroneously connect them with Christianity. They oftentimes cite the following passage from one of Hitler’s speeches:

“The National Government will regard it as its first and foremost duty to revive in the nation the spirit of unity and co-operation. It will preserve and defend those basic principles on which our nation has been built. It regards Christianity as the foundation of our national morality, and the family as the basis of national life.”

Although SJWs erroneously claim that Hitler was not a socialist just because he said he was one, they will simultaneously use statements like these to say that Hitler was a Christian just because he said he was one. The difference between the Hitler’s statements on socialism, and his statements on Christianity, is that unlike Hitler’s statements with regards to his socialist allegiances, there are directly conflicting statements made by Hitler out of the public eye regarding Christianity that have been documented. Although Hitler was raised Catholic, he developed other religious leanings over time. But Germany was predominately Christian, and Hitler could not have rose to power without the support of Christians, so he appealed to them.

In the book Rise And Fall Of The Third Reich, William Shirer wrote:

“Under the leadership of Rosenberg, Bormann and Himmler, who were backed by Hitler, the Nazi regime intended to destroy Christianity in Germany, if it could, and substitute the old paganism of the early tribal Germanic gods and the new paganism of the Nazi extremists.”

Additionally,

Historian Richard Evans wrote that,

“the Nazis regarded the churches as the strongest and toughest reservoirs of ideological opposition to the principles they believed in.”

This is congruent with the sentiments of communist inmate Antonio Gramsci, who felt that the primary enemy was Christiandom, because Christianity was the dominant force in Western Civilization for around 2000 years. It’s also congruent with the conflict between Christianity and Eugenics which the Nazi party would embrace. You can read more about Gramsci here.

Hitler himself writes in Mein Kampf,

So Hitler was appealing to what he felt was the lowest form of intelligence, some of whom happened to be Christians. They were people that Hitler thought he could take advantage of, with a little Eddie Hascal-esque charisma. For instance, let’s look at the following statement from Adolf Hitler:

Clearly Hitler was a liar, and we know that socialists are inherently dishonest, particularly when it comes to doing and saying whatever it takes to advance their smelly struggle. In fact, we can cite a whole series of other statements made by Hitler in confidence, that demonstrate his true sentiments towards Christianity. Much like domestic socialists in the United States and elsewhere in the Western world, Hitler and his Nazis didn’t much care for Christians.

The sentiment towards Christianity in these statements are corroborated by other Nazi Officials such as Jeffrey Goebbels who remarked,

“The Fuhrer is deeply religous, though completely anti-Christian. He views Christianity as a symptom of decay. Rightly so. It is a branch of the Jewish race… Both [Judaism and Christianity] have no point of contact to the animal element, and thus, in the end, they will be destroyed.”

Reich Leader Martin Bormann stated,

“National Socialist and Christian concepts are incompatible. The Christian Churches build upon the ignorance of men and strive to keep large portions of the people in ignorance because only in this way can the Christian Churches maintain their power. On the other hand, National Socialism is based on scientific foundations. Christianity’s immutable principles, which were laid down almost two thousand years ago, have increasingly stiffened into life-alien dogmas. National Socialism, however, if it wants to fulfill its task further, must always guide itself according to the newest data of scientific researches.”

In fact, it’s common historical knowledge that Germany’s Nazi Party was partly founded on an occult goulash which consisted of the Vril Society, the Thule Society, Theosophy, Nordic and Germanic Paganism, the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche, and a whole host pseudosciences such as Eugenics and Social Darwinism (see John Dewey). In fact, the Nazi regime routinely used Pagan symbols throughout Nazi symbology and iconography. These are hardly the practices and foundational beliefs of a Christian oriented political party.

The fact of the matter is that Hitler and his leftist Nazis, had a plan ready to be put into place to eliminate Christians, similar to what they imposed upon the Jews, according to secret OSS documents.

Hilter envisioned a National Reich Church, but its purpose appears to have been to worship Hitler and oppose and replace Christianity,

Hitler and Mussolini were Big Fans of FDR’s New Deal

The New Deal was a series of relief, recovery, and reform packages of legislation that were intended to cope with the Great Depression primarily from 1933 to 1936 via central planning. Contrary to the SJW myth that the New Deal helped America recover from the Great Depression, it in fact had the unfortunate side effect of prolonging the Depression until 1943. GDP dropped from $104 billion in 1929 to $56 billion in 1941. The unemployment rate soared from 3.2% in 1939 to 24.9% in 1933. The Federal Budget went into deficit throughout the 1930s from a surplus in 1929. New Deal cultural programs were stricken with government censorship. Government activism and experimentation through New Deal policies worsened nearly every aspect of the American economy.

Dictators Hitler and Mussolini both praised Liberal Democratic President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s New Deal programs, which they saw as closely resembling programs established under their own fascist governments. Indeed, many argue that the New Deal accomplished much of which Fabian Socialists had been pining for.

Now, who is it that wants to “silence dissenting voices?”

American Student Activists Protest War Against Hitler

Throughout the 1930s, hundreds of thousands of college student activists consisting of liberals, pacifists, communists, and socialists all identifying with the American labor movement, engaged in anti-war and anti-fascist protests against going to war with Hitler and Nazi Germany. Such students were likely created through John Dewey’s low literacy education reforms which made socialist indoctrination possible. In the video below they hold signs asking “Hitler has not attacked us, why attack Hitler?” and “Why Not Peace with Hitler?”

Nazis Were Huge Animal Rights Activists

Animal Rights were of primary importance to the Nazi regime. In 1933 Hermann Goering announced,

The Nazi Law for the Protection of Animals was hailed as a new moral concept where animals would be protected as primary beings rather than secondary to the human condition. Not only were laws against vivisection instituted, but also prohibitions against using animals in film making or other public events, strict regulations on slaughtering of cattle, severe limitations on hunting, guidelines for the transportation of animals, protections for animals in the wild, and so on. Animal rights were taught in the universities. These laws and regulations were oftentimes used as a pretense to have Jewish scientists arrested.

Historians Arnold Arluke and Boria Sax wrote,

“The Nazis abolished moral distinctions between animals and people by viewing people as animals. The result was that animals could be considered `higher’ than some people. “Nazi German identity relied on the blurring of boundaries between humans and animals and the constructing of a unique phylogenetic hierarchy that altered conventional human-animal distinctions and imperatives. . . . As part of the natural order, Germans of Aryan stock were to be bred like farm stock, while `lower animals’ or `subhumans,’ such as the Jews and other victims of the Holocaust, were to be exterminated like vermin as testament to the new `natural’ and biological order conceived under the Third Reich.”

Nazis Used German Proto-Hippies to Invent Eco-Fascism

Green ideas were at the core of Nazi thinking. It began with the merging of the environmental activists from the Volk Society and Nazi philosophies. Both came together over their shared hatred of capitalism and Judeo-Christianity. But it was primarily capitalism that they blamed for harm to the environment.

“The work of the peasant does not challenge the soil of the field. In sowing grain it places seed in the keeping of the forces of growth and watches over its increase. But even the cultivation of the field has come under the grip of another kind of setting-in-order, which sets upon nature … Agriculture is now the mechanized food industry. To save the earth is more than to exploit it or even wear it out. Saving the earth does not master the earth and does not subjugate it, which is merely one step from boundless spoliation.” -Nazi Philosopher Martin Heidegger

During the Weimar Period of Germany, the Wandervögel emerged with their own brand of environmentalism.

That’s right. America did not produce the world’s first hippies. Germany did. Confirmation of this can be read in their 1913 essay Man and Earth. But the Wandervögel would eventually be absorbed by the Nazi Party, in a similar way that American hippies were absorbed by the Democratic Party.

“Man’s effort to build up something that contradicts the iron logic of nature brings him into conflict with those principles to which he himself exclusively owes his existence. By acting against the laws of nature he prepares the way that leads to ruin … Our planet has been moving through spaces of ether for millions and millions of years, uninhabited by men, and at some future date may easily begin to do so again – if men should forget that wherever they have reached a superior level of existence, it was not the result of following the ideas of crazy visionaries but by acknowledging and rigorously observing the iron laws of nature.” -Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf

There also appeared to be a kind of quasi-religious belief system that combined with Nazi environmentalism, which in part came from the neo-pagan elements that the Nazi Party was partly founded on.

Blood and Soil would become the name for the Nazi environmental policies, making the Nazi Party one of the first leftist organization to embrace pseudoscience as a tool to push policy making.

Interestingly, it has been recently discovered that carbon emissions simultaneously green deserts, and grow rainforests. It’s a good thing that I don’t have a YouTube channel.

Nazis Had A Hankerin’ For Organic Food

The concept of organic farming began with a group of German “naturopaths, nature healers, nudists, and back-to-the-landers” known as the Life Reform Movement (Lebensreform). But the concept appealed to top Nazi officials so much, that they organized state action around organic food farming. Most of the top Nazi officials ate strictly organic food, many were vegetarians, and special organic food supplies were secured for Hitler’s SS. Himmler even established experimental organic farms to grow herbs for SS medicinal purposes. However, Nazis would discover that the medieval farming methods used to produce organic food, would not meet demands. So they had to grudgingly utilize modern capitalist food production to pick up the slack. Older ex-Nazis would carry the organic food tradition into the 1950s, 60s, and 70s, when it was assimilated by the larger environmental movements.

Hitler was a Vegetarian

For years SJWs have been writing articles all over the internet attempting to deny Hitler’s vegetarianism. Many of the articles cite Hitler’s purported “fondness for sausages” as some sort of proof. Then in 2013 Hitler’s personal food taster, Margot Woelk, opened up about working as one of 15 female food testers, who ensured that the Fuhrer’s food wasn’t poisoned by taking a bite of it themselves. She stated,

Hitler referred to meat broth as “corpse tea,” and told Goebbels that he intended to convert all of Germany to vegetarianism after the war. Most of Hitler’s top officers were vegetarians. A Hitler Youth manual promoted soya beans as an alternative to meat, referring to them as “Nazi beans” in a likely attempt to condition youth for the planned vegan conversion. The hunting of animals for food or sport would eventually be prohibited.

Margot was relieved of her duty when the war came to an end, after which she was raped for 14 consecutive days by “liberating” communist Russians.

Nazis Would have Hated Wal-Mart, Hobby Lobby, and Chick-fil-A

Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Party appealed to the mittlelstand, a group of people in between the bourgeois and the proletariat; the middle class. These consisted of mom and pop store owners, artisan craftsmen, small independent farmers, etc., whom the Nazi Party promised protection from the competition of large department stores. The Nazi Party organized the mittelstand to engage in protests, physical attacks, boycotts against large department stores, and franchised chain businesses. Propaganda attacks were launched against religious Jewish stores, which were taken over at bargain prices, and driven out of urban areas. Eventually the Nazi Party would prohibit chain businesses from opening new franchises, or from offering significant discounts on prices. This was done under the aegis of protecting small business owners. In reality, the cheaper prices that made commodities available to wider classes of peoples undermined the social status of self stylized elites.

Nazi Germany Impressed W.E.B. DuBois

In 1937, socialist turned communist W.E.B. DuBois had the honor of touring Nazi Germany. He praised their housing and highway system. Deputy Führer Rudolph Hess “made the best impression” on Professor DuBois. While DuBois marveled at the “universal and complete elimination of opposition,” he did not detect “any undercurrent [of discontent], certainly at the same time a little pure happiness.” He saw no parallels between the plight of the African American and the Jewish German, because as he saw it, what was happening in Germany was happening “in a lawful way and openly.”

Nazis Used Gun Registration to Disarm Their Political Enemies

While the tactic of disarming your political opponents and scapegoats is not exclusive to Nazi Germany, many continue to erroneously believe that gun control played no part in the Nazi rise to power. Some argue semantics, some are under the false impression that gun ownership was deregulated and expanded under the Nazis, some believe that if there had been stricter gun laws it might have prevented the Nazis from rising to power even though the Nazis never bothered to register their weapons anyway, some naively believe that an armed people is easier to subjugate than a disarmed people, others simply have no idea what on Earth they’re talking about.

“The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. So let’s not have any native militia or native police. German troops alone will bear the sole responsibility for the maintenance of law and order throughout the occupied Russian territories, and a system of military strong-points must be evolved to cover the entire occupied country.” –Adolf Hitler dinner talk on April 11, 1942, quoted in Hitler’s Table Talk 1941-44: His Private Conversations, Second Edition (1973), Pg. 425-426. Translated by Norman Cameron and R. H. Stevens. Introduced and with a new preface by H. R. Trevor-Roper. The original German papers were known as Bormann-Vermerke.

The Weimar Republic passed the Firearms Law in 1928 which required police stations to maintain detailed records on firearms owners, and required firearms owners to register. Weimar officials ensured the public that such records would be confidential and kept out of the reach of extremists. Those committing communist and Nazi political violence did not register their weapons. When the Nazis came to power in 1933, they continued to enforce the strict gun laws that the left leaning Weimar Republic had put into place. Then in 1938, the Reichstag enacted new gun control laws called Waffengesetz. From that point forward, only “politically reliable” people would be allowed to own firearms, and they had to register their firearms with the Nazi Party which involved a background check. Private unauthorized firearms ownership was a capital crime. All records would be used to track down firearms owners and deal with them. Shooting clubs were banned. Later, weapons were seized from political opponents designated as “enemies of the state” throughout Germany. Then, the disarmament of their political scapegoats came shortly thereafter:

Joseph Goebbels gave the order:

“All Jewish stores are to be destroyed immediately . . . . Jewish synagogues are to be set on fire . . . . The Führer wishes that the police does not intervene. . . . All Jews are to be disarmed. In the event of resistance they are to be shot immediately.”

The New York Times Reported on Kristallnacht; The Night of Broken Glass:

The Berlin Police President, Count Wolf Heinrich von Helldorf, announced that as a result of a police activity in the last few weeks the entire Jewish population of Berlin had been “disarmed” with the confiscation of 2,569 hand weapons, 1,702 firearms and 20,000 rounds of ammunition. Any Jews still found in possession of weapons without valid licenses are threatened with the severest punishment.

Heinrich Himmler forbade Jews to own weapons of any kind and gave them a 20 year sentence at a concentration camp if any were found in their possession. Their homes, businesses, and synagogues were ransacked, and burned.

Nazis Were Selectively Pro-Choice

SJWs have written article upon article all over the internet claiming that the Nazis were opposed to abortion. They were, but just as with the SJW narrative about Nazis killing the unions, its only half of the story.

Nazis prohibited abortion only for Aryan women. For “unAryan” women, and for Aryan women deemed “feeble minded,” the Nazis supported abortion as a eugenicist tool for racial cleansing much in the same way that American eugenicists advocated.

This of course is congruent with euthanasia enthusiast and socialist Margaret Sanger’s vision, which inspired Nazi eugenicist thought:

Non-Aryan women in conquered nations were subject to forcible abortions. Lebensraum was the name given to the effort to create Aryan living space in conquered nations by reducing the population of undesirables, and whomever the Nazis deemed as racially impure.

Abortion for any reason was originally prohibited in 1939 Poland. But when the Nazis conquered half of Poland in that year, they abolished all Polish anti-abortion laws. They then later instituted a pro-abortion campaign entitled Auswahlfeiheit, which means “Freedom of Choice.” Auswahlfeiheit was marketed to non-Aryan women only. One can’t help but wonder if the Nazi “Freedom of Choice” marketing campaign in Poland inspired the “Pro-Choice” campaigns in America.

Adolf Hitler stated,

“They may use contraceptives or practice abortion–the more the better. In view of the large families of the native population, it could only suit us if girls and women there had as many abortions as possible. Active trade in contraceptives ought to be actually encouraged in the Eastern territories, as we could not possibly have the slightest interest in increasing the non-Germanic population.”

Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf,

In 1939 after the conquest of Poland, the SS organization Reich Commission for the Strengthening of Germandom decreed:

“All measures which have the tendency to limit the births are to be tolerated or to be supported. Abortion in the remaining area of Poland must be declared free from punishment. the means for abortion and contraceptive means may be offered publicly without police restriction. Homosexuality [which was illegal under Polish law] is to be declared legal. The institutions and persons involved professionally in abortion practices are not to be interfered with by police.”

In 1943, Nazi Racial Administrator for the Reich’s Eastern Territories Ministry Professor Erhard Wetzel wrote in regards to nations conquered by the Nazis:

“Every propaganda means, especially the press, radio, and movies, as well as pamphlets, booklets, and lectures, must be used to instill in the Russian population the idea that it is harmful to have several children. We must emphazise the expenses that children cause, the good things that people could have had with the money spent on them. We could also hint at the dangerous effect of child-bearing on a woman’s health. Paralleling such propaganda, a large-scale campaign would be launched in favor of contraceptive devices. A contraceptive industry must be established. Neither the circulation and sale of contraceptives nor abortions must be prosecuted. It will even be necessary to open special institutions for abortion, and to train midwives and nurses for this purpose. The population will practice abortion all the more willingly if these institutions are competently operated.”

In 2010 an anti-abortion campaign in Poland caused outrage, because it reminded Polish people of how Hitler introduced abortion to Poland with Pro Choice.

Hitler and Stalin go on Honeymoon

As previously noted, some mischaracterize the conflict between National Socialists and Marxist Socialists as Nazis hating Marxist Communists. But in fact, those two competing visions of socialism found common ground and worked together before igniting World War II.

Shortly after the Nazis conquered half of Poland in 1939, the Soviet Unions’s Red Army rolled into Poland as well. The Soviet forces however, gave the Polish the impression that they were there to fight the Nazis off. Instead, the Nazi and the Soviet armies met in the town of Brest; the same town where the German Keiser and Vladimir Lenin signed the 1918 Peace Treaty during World War I. The generals of the two armies, Guderian and Krivosheinmet, met for lunch. The soldiers from both armies fraternized and performed a joint military “brotherhood” parade. The Soviet commander invited German reporters to visit him in Moscow “after the victory over capitalist Albion.” Thus began the Nazi-Soviet Pact on August 23rd which would last for 22 months.

SJWs dismiss the Nazi-Soviet Pact, also known as the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, as a tactical pause. But the reality was that, “The two totalitarian systems traded in all the necessary commodities of war: not just oil and vital chemicals, but arms and ships. They exhibited each other’s cultural achievements, performed each other’s music and films, stressed their joint hostility to Western capitalism.” In fact the Nazi SS and the Soviet NKVD enjoyed direct cooperation during the first two years of World War II.

Soviet Secret Police would capture Jews that had escaped Germany, and handed over to the Gestapo. Nazi Germany sent the Soviet Union fighter jets, explosive chemicals and bombs, radio stations, and industrial facilities. In return, the Soviet Union cooperated with Germany by routinely sending the Nazis petroleum products, grain, nickel, manganese, and chromium for steel production, phosphate, wood, and other raw materials, until 1941 when Hitler attacked the Soviet Union which ended the Pact. It’s no wonder that the Pact is also referred to as The Honeymoon For Two Dictators.

Afterward, Josef Stalin would claim that he moved to protect the Ukrainian and Byelorussian minorities in Eastern Poland. Stalin then, “organised rigged elections, which produced new parliaments, which promptly petitioned to be allowed to join the USSR.” It’s no surprise that Ex-KGB Vladimir Putin defended the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, given the similarities of recent events in Crimea and Georgia.

A Times editorial observed that “Only those can be disappointed who clung to the ingenuous belief that Russia was to be distinguished from her Nazi neighbour, despite the identity of their institutions and political idiom, by her foreign policy”.

Subsequently, August 23rd became celebrated as Black Ribbon Day in nations that Stalin was able to invade thanks to the Pact, to remind the West of the treachery of Josef Stalin and of the victims of communism.

FDR Didn’t Like Jews Much More Than Hitler Did

Liberal Democratic President Franklin Delano Roosevelt was reported to have told Stalin, that the only concession he would make to the Saudi King would be to give him America’s 6 Million Jews. Roosevelt felt that the “specific and understandable complaints which the Germans bore toward the Jews in Germany” ought to be dealt with. FDR once claimed with pride that, “there is no Jewish blood in our veins.” Some have suggested that FDR’s comments were merely icebreakers, but other instances corroborate what does appear to be genuine anti-semitism.

FDR would refuse to bomb the railroad tracks that transported Jews to the Nazi death camps in order to appease domestic anti-semites in exchange for political favors, which some refer to as the middle ground of statesmanship. FDR refused to give European Jews visas to enter the United States, for much the same reason. FDR refused to admit the Jewish refugees aboard the S.S. St. Louis, and instead returned them to Germany. With FDR’s approval Harvard University would accept no more than 15% Jews.

Perhaps worse of all is the revelation that FDR’s White House actively worked to suppress news of the Jewish Holocaust.

So the question then becomes, was FDR’s treachery the result of the anti-semitism he shared with other tyrants of the day, or was it concern that foreign Jews with first hand experience of socialism would come to the United States and vote against him, while additionally convincing the domestic Jewish population to vote against him?

Nazi Universal Healthcare

Universal Healthcare in Germany was adopted in the 1880s under the Bismark with Reichsversicherungsverordnung (Reich Insurance Act), under the misguided notion that injecting a little socialism into the system would inoculate Germany from being infected with much more severe socialism. During the Weimar Republic, the focus shifted away from treating ailments and to preventative medicine. Doctors worked for government rather than the individual patient, and would provide healthcare to all German citizens. Eugenics and Social Darwinism crept into the medical profession, and “mental defectives” that were once relatively free in local wards were sent to state institutions for euthanasia. This feeling towards “defectives” began to expand to include those who were viewed as weak, since they felt many were too weak to serve as soldiers in the German army. The feeling was that limited resources should not be used to treat the sick and suffering, and that they ought to be sacrificed for the greater good of Germany.

When the Nazis came to power, they began forcibly sterilizing anyone they deemed mentally ill. Private insurers were heavily regulated and forced to report directly to Berlin. The right of reproduction was prohibited for mental inferiors. A Genetic Health Court made health decisions based on the prevailing eugenics and Social Darwinism philosophies and politics of the day. Concepts of racial hygiene also became part of the German medical profession, and euthanasia initiatives were employed to rid Germany of other undesirables and “defectives.” Some of these solutions would involve medical experiments on children. Other solutions were more final. Inspired by the work of Margaret Sanger’s eugenics collective, Nazi Universal Healthcare employed a combination of forced sterilizations and euthanasia in order to improve the remaining racial stock.

Thus, the Holocaust began in socialized German hospitals, and then expanded with Adolf Hitler’s T4 program which subjected the handicapped, mentally ill, the elderly, and any other groups that Hitler deemed had “lives not worth living” with “mercy killings.” Killing these individuals would save them years of suffering, while simultaneously saving money in the socialized medicine system. “A healthy society costs less.” In fact, the Holocaust and the Final Solution were an extension of Nazi Universal Healthcare, given that the death camps were run by socialized doctors and medical personnel. Fabian Socialist George Bernard Shaw got his wish, and “humane” Zyklon B was invented.

Hitler used the imposition of Universal Healthcare on the foreign nations that he conquered as a weapon, and as a method to control the local population. Whatever class of people he deemed racially unhygienic could be eliminated via the socialized medicine infrastructure.

Economic Fascism in Nazi Germany

“The maxim that society exists only for the well-being and freedom of the individuals composing it does not seem to be in conformity with nature’s plans. If classical liberalism spells individualism, Fascism spells government.” -Benito Mussolini

Nazi Germany and their contemporary ally Italy, engaged in Economic Fascism, also known as Corporatism.

Corporatism had four primary elements:

The Nazis raised corporate taxes from 20% in 1934, to 40% by 1939.

The Nazis lowered income taxes for favored racial stocks in Germany, while simultaneously raising income taxes for their political enemies in conquered lands.

[Götz] Aly demonstrates convincingly that Nazi “domestic policies were remarkably friendly toward the German lower classes, soaking the wealthy and redistributing the burdens of wartime.” And with fresh memories of Weimer inflation, “transferring the tax burden to corporations earned the leadership in Berlin considerable political capital, as the government keenly registered.”

Privatization existed in name only, while in reality all substantive ownership of industry lied in Nazi Germany government. Government decided through heavy regulation what was to be produced, how it was to be produced, how much to produce, who would receive what was produced, what prices and wages should be set at, etc. “Owners” were little more than figureheads.

In the Nazi economy there was no question of private initiative and free enterprise. All production activities were directed by the Reichswirtschaftsministerium. No enterprise was free to deviate in the conduct of its operations from the orders issued by the government.

There was also the Reich Flight Tax. This sought to prevent capital from leaving the country when citizens understandably fled.

The Pink Swastika

Many are familiar with The Pink Triangle, the symbol that homosexuals sent to internment camps were forced to wear. It’s estimated that somewhere between 5,000 and 15,000 homosexuals were persecuted. An unknown percentage of them had no homosexual history whatsoever, but were victims of false accusations for political purposes. But many of these homosexuals would later be released from their camps, and drafted to serve in the German army.

The Roehm Purge is often cited as evidence of Nazi persecution of homosexuals. Over the course of a weekend, Hitler ordered the assassination of hundreds of Hitler’s political rivals and opponents. Some of these victims happened to be homosexuals including Roehm himself. Publicly, Hitler justified these actions as some sort of moral purge, but the fact that there were many victims without any homosexual history demonstrates that this was part of a political power struggle.

Few however, are familiar with The Pink Swastika.

Before Adolf Hitler, the first leader of the Nazi Party was Ernst Roehm who was a homosexual. Hitler and Roehm met in a socialist organization called the Iron Fist. Hitler was Roehm’s protege who “saw in Hitler the demagogue he required to mobilize mass support for his secret army,” according to author author Heinz Hohne. Roehm later commanded the Nazis stormtroopers.

Roehm saw homosexuality as the foundation for a new society that would elevate homosexual behavior to that of high repute. He flaunted his homosexuality and encouraged others to do the same. Roehm felt that only homosexuals could engage in the kind of belligerent and violent behavior that he needed in Nazi soldiers, to assault anyone that would oppose them. Many homosexuals would be recruited into positions within the Nazi stormtroopers solely on the basis of their sexuality, without regard to their qualifications or lack thereof. In fact the leadership of the stormtroopers were predominately if not entirely homosexual.

Much of the Nazi interest in homosexuality had to do with the revival of ancient Greek and Hellenic standards which dovetailed into the Nazi interest of ancient Pagan beliefs. Pederasty with the Wandervögel became fashionable as a result. Additionally, homosexuality was used in schools as one method to de-Christianize youth.

Hitler himself was rumored to have worked as a male prostitute in his youth. Hitler surrounded himself with homosexual companions, and appointed many homosexuals to significant positions within the 3rd Reich.

As with unions and abortion, leftist Nazis were in favor of anything that supported their cause, while simultaneously opposing anything that didn’t. So much like modern SJWs in America, they celebrated and rewarded homosexuals that supported their political cause, while simultaneously persecuting those who didn’t. Sadly, like many other things, homosexuality was merely used as a pretense by the Nazis to persecute political opponents and reward political allies.

In the United States, capitalism would lead to open civil rights for gay Americans.

Nazi Public Education

“When an opponent declares, ‘I will not come over to your side,’ I calmly say, ‘Your child belongs to us already… What are you? You will pass on. Your descendants, however, now stand in the new camp. In a short time they will know nothing else but this new community.'” -Adolf Hitler

Separating children from parental authority in order to indoctrinate them with a new moral code is a common theme often repeated among SJW “educators.” John Dewey, the father of modern public education, blamed parents for many of society’s ills:

“Just as society may deny satisfaction to the physical, educational and cultural needs of the young, so their parents and guardians may slight or ignore their rights. Most adults cannot be held individually culpable for such misdeeds; they, too, have been shaped by the society around them and are goaded by its necessities. Through them and others around them the rising generation suffers from the inadequacies of their social inheritance and the evils of their surroundings. Growing children are normally unaware of the remoter social causes of their misfortunes and miseries; even their elders may not know about them. So they direct their resentments, as well as focus their affections, upon the members of their immediate circle. The novels of the past 150 years provide plenty of pathetic tales and tragic descriptions of family conflicts at all age levels.”

Founder of the Frankfort School Georg Lukacs used derision of parental authority as part of his academic indoctrination strategy. In 1983 Secular Humanist author John Dunphy wrote about Christian parents in Humanist Magazine:

“The classroom must and will become an arena of conflict between the old and new – the rotting corpse of Christianity, together with all its adjacent evils and misery, and the new faith of humanism, resplendent in its promise of a world in which the never-realized Christian ideal of ‘love thy neighbor’ will finally be achieved. That friends, is a declaration of war. Our children are under attack in the classroom day in and day out, yet many parents do not even know the war has begun!”

Under the condition of separation from parental authority which Nazi public education fostered, the Nazis would control education from kindergarten to university. Hitler demanded universal education for German children in point 20 of the National Socialist German Workers Party Platform:

“We demand the education of gifted children of poor parents, whatever their class or occupation, at the expense of the State.”

The Reichsschulpflichtgesetz (Compulsory Eduction Law) required all German children to attend Nazi schools. Home schooling was explicitly banned, and the few private schools that were allowed to exist were required to operate under strict Nazi guidelines and approval. Parents who dared to interfere with the state indoctrination of their children, were punished.

All content in textbooks were required to adhere to a core curricula and had to receive approval by the central Nazi authority. Devotion to the national leader Adolf Hitler, a key component in socialist indoctrination, was omnipresent in school curricula.

German youth were inundated with Nazi propaganda in school and in organizations like the Hitler Youth which also provided instruction and guidance. Children were made to feel special, made to feel that the Nazi Party was a youth movement, and that Nazi youth themselves were “dynamic, resilient, forward-looking, and hopeful.”

German students were constantly indoctrinated with racial grievances, whereby they were taught glorification of favored races (Aryans), while simultaneously being taught denigration of inferior races (Jews, gypsies, bastard races, etc.). This sick obsession with divisive racial grievances inflicts SJWs today. In modern American public education, the racial bigotry still remains, but the color of the bigotry has shifted for political convenience. Today educators indoctrinate children with glorification of favored races (people of color), while simultaneously indoctrinating children with denigration of inferior races (white privilege). Both are merely two sides of the same coin; a deeply sick obsession with the artificial divisions of race.

The Nazis would purge their public school system of “politically unreliable” educators, in virtually the same manner that modern American public education institutions currently do. Nazis would examine German teachers and remove all “harmful and untrustworthy” elements. Such teachers were dismissed and replaced with “state spirited” teachers who were required to swear an oath of loyalty to Hitler, though there weren’t many teachers who didn’t support Hitler. Teachers were required to participate “strenuously” in elections through activism, and encourage political activism in their students.

The Nazis would pander to the ego of youth to win their support:

Suppression of the individual in preference of servitude to the state was a core educational principle.

This is congruent with John Dewey’s views of individualism vs. collectivism. He said:

And of course leftists in general have a visceral reaction against individualism, rugged or otherwise. Children were never taught or encouraged to question their teachers or the curricula they were being fed. Most of them never did.

The Nazis also imposed a mandatory national service on their youth:

Bishop Joseph McFadden of the Diocese of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania made the following observation about the American public education system:

The Prisoners of Auschwitz Were Not FDR’s Friends

In 1944, Allied forces sent planes into Germany to conduct surveillance for future bombing raids. During their mission, these missions secured photographs of railways leading to the Auschwitz internment camp.

Some defend the decision not to bomb Auschwitz as the decision to not bomb innocent Jews imprisoned within them. But requests were also made to bomb the railways that carried Jews to the internment camp.

Some claim that the bombing was imprecise, and wouldn’t have destroyed Auschwitz. They denied the request, stating that bombing Auschwitz would require diverting aircraft from the battlefield. But a B-24 pilot disagreed.

The Israeli Prime Minister concurred:

Some claim that FDR’s domestic plans did not include a new wave of Jewish refugees. But we can look to FDR’s anti-semitism and his own affinity for multi-cultural internment camps (Japanese, German, and Italian) for a potentially deeper context.

The Nazis Fulfilled the Dreams of Fabian Socialists

One of the trademarks of leftist tyrants is their affinity for internment and concentration camps, where they place whomever they deem undesirable at any given moment. The Chinese have their laogai. The Soviet Union had their gulags. Mussolini’s Italy had Fossoli. No doubt FDR thought he could gain entrance into the exclusive dictator collective by establishing his own multi-cultural internment camps. But nothing could compare to the horrors of Nazi Germany concentration camps, which were discovered in 1944 when the Soviet Army marched into Majdanek; the first Nazi concentration camp to be discovered. In the infamous Auschwitz camp, 348,820 men’s suits and 836,515 women’s dresses neatly folded, pyramids of dentures and eyeglasses, and seven tons of women’s hair were found. Not only were prisoners in these camps forced into hard labor, but they were also the involuntary subjects of “scientific” experimentation, as well as victims of genocidal slaughter in the infamous Nazi gas chambers. The Nazis had accomplished what Fabian Socialists called for.

“I have never felt able to describe my emotional reactions when I first came face to face with indisputable evidence of Nazi brutality and ruthless disregard of every shred of decency…. I have never at any other time experienced an equal sense of shock.” -Dwight Eisenhower

The Matriarchy Gave Birth to Nazi Ideology

One might look at Adolf Hitler, Heinrich Himmler, Joseph Goebbels, and think that these patriarchal figures who led the Nazis are the perfect example of the toxic masculinity that SJWs constantly blather on about. Perhaps.

But where did the ideology that these men fell for come from?

As I demonstrated earlier, SJW folk hero Margaret Sanger was the leading mind in the Eugenicist aspects of Nazi ideology.

Hitler’s father was a violent drunkard whom he hated. Though he loved his mother. His father died in 1903, leaving his mother Klara to raise Adolf as a single mother.

Notions of Aryans, came from Thosophist Madame Blavatsky.

Three women who contributed to Adolf Hitler’s upbringing and the formation of Nazi ideology. That sounds like the Matriarchy to me.

Democratic Financier was a Nazi Collaborator

George Soros was born in Hungary in 1930 under the name George Schwartz. His parents were non-practicing Jews who changed their name from Schwartz to Soros in 1936, in order to conceal his family’s Jewish heritage. When the Nazis conquered Budapest in 1944, the father Trividar Soros/Schwartz divided his family in order to minimize any chance that they might all be killed together. He forged documents for family members to conceal their identities and ethnicity, and sent them to various locations. He sent his son George to a Hungarian bureaucrat named Baumbach who would take George in as his godson. Baumbach was tasked with confiscating the property of Jews and sending them deportation notices, before sending them directly to Germany. George, at the age of 14, would accompany Baumbach on his rounds. Of his experience, George Soros later stated that the German occupation of Hungary was,

According to an interview with the Toronto Sun,

Some attempt to explain Soros’ work for the Nazis as little more than the hi-jinks of a naive teenager. Though, teenagers younger than 14 have been tried for murder as an adult in America, and other teenagers who served with the Nazis have been tried as war criminals. Werewolf and Hitler Youth Karl Dietz for instance was only 15 years old.

So there you have it. A basic CliffsNotes as to who and what the Nazis actually were.

This is why I commonly ask SJWs the following questions:

Did Nazis support a Constitutional division of powers, or did they consolidate centralized power? Were Nazis champions of deregulation, or strict regulation? Did Nazis support limited government, or big government? Did the Nazis support free markets? Did Nazis support free speech? Did the Nazis support religious freedom? Did the Nazis promote private firearms ownership? What is your perspective on the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact?

Go ahead and ask them these questions. Then be sure to tell them that you’re “genuinely curious” as to their answers.

Firstly it’s amusing to watch the ones who have no idea how to answer these questions sputter and stammer. Secondly, the answers the brighter SJWs are forced to give make them realize some very uncomfortable realities.

How on Earth, would the Nazis, or any fascist regime, impose fascism through the deregulation that right-wingers support? Don’t you need as many regulations as you can get, in order to impose fascism in the first place? How can you have limited government which the right-wing supports, under a fascist state? Wouldn’t a fascist state require big government in order to impost fascism? Why would fascists want their own power divided with a Constitution? Why would fascists allow private firearms ownership, when it would only arm the very people that they want to subjugate and impose fascism on? The rest is probably obvious.

So the whole notion that the Nazis were or are right-wing, is laughable at best. It ultimately doesn’t make any sense once you start to answer really basic questions.

And no, the few freaks running around today wearing swastikas are not Nazis, anymore than the robed hippies worshiping at Stonehenge are druids. The Nazis were defeated in 1945 by men far braver and bolder than any idiot SJW could ever hope to be, even if they use the word “literally.”