babygiraffe said: Coinfirm provides compliance services to companies (centralized entities) that are subject to regulation. They have been and will continue to be subject to regulation. We can either ignore the needs of these businesses, or ensure a solution exists that allows them to integrate with Dash. This has nothing to do with regulation of the network itself to be absolutely clear. Click to expand...

This hasto do with regulation of the dash network. There is no store of value that isn't a slave to lawmakers... or else, in their eyes, a conduit for money laundering. There are strict laws for loyalty points, strict laws for lotteries... what makes you think dash is different to everything else? Let me guess, dash is just a pipe and not subject to regulation? - wrong.. that would be like saying, google is just a pipe for information, therefore no need to block fake news sites, or piracy sites, or even eu laws for "the right to be forgotten". The fact is, every day google removes tens of thousands of links. Do you think google wouldn't abide by data retention laws? - or assist in the tracking and monitoring of individuals? For even if google said no - haha, not a chance! - they surely wouldn't or couldn't stop the insertion of black boxes on the edges of their network. Do you think Evan, the face of dash, could never be held to account for being complicit in money laundering? - without some kind of mechanism for accountability? Or members of the core team coerced into inserting "accidental bugs" in the code? Aaah, is that why there isn't a single core member willing to give greater priority to improving dash's privacy?Go ahead core team, prove me wrong and counter all this compliance shit with a greater commitment to improving dash's privacy. But core won't when it's far more convenient to let dash's privacy rot into oblivion.