The attorney of Alabama Senate candidate Roy Moore sought to discredit one of the women accusing Moore of sexual assault, implying she had manipulated circumstantial evidence.

The accuser, Beverly Young Nelson, showed reporters a yearbook that she said Moore had signed in 1977 when he was visiting the restaurant she worked at.

Moore’s attorney demanded that Nelson and her attorney turn over the yearbook so a “handwriting expert” can analyze the message.

He further implied that Nelson had lifted a signature from court documents and planted it onto the yearbook.

The attorney of Roy Moore, the Alabama Republican running for Senate amid allegations that he sexually harassed and assaulted teenage girls decades ago, sought on Wednesday to discredit the account of one of Moore’s accusers, demanding an expert investigate one of the claims she made.

Philip Jauregui, the attorney, cast doubt on a yearbook brought forward as circumstantial evidence by Beverly Young Nelson, a woman who said she was assaulted by Moore when she was a 16-year-old waitress and he was 30.

In a press conference with attorney Gloria Allred earlier this week, Nelson showed reporters a copy of the yearbook she said Moore had signed during an earlier visit to the restaurant she worked at.

“To a sweeter more beautiful girl I could not say, ‘Merry Christmas.’ Love, Roy Moore DA, 12-22-77, Olde Hickory House,” the message said.

Foto: source Screenshot

Jauregui on Wednesday said that he is sending a letter to Allred demanding that she and Nelson turn over the yearbook itself and subject the message to an analysis by a handwriting expert.

Lees ook op Business Insider Daimler stort zich op de markt voor elektrische trucks met 2 nieuwe modellen van Mercedes – en gaat strijd aan met Tesla en Nikola

“Is it genuine? Or a fraud?” Jauregui said, urging the public to compare the yearbook against Moore’s handwriting themselves. “Judge Moore says there’s no way in the world that that’s his handwriting … I’m asking you all to take a look and make a judgment.”

Jauregui also said that despite Nelson’s statements that she had never had contact with Moore since the alleged incident, she actually had made contact with him – when she filed a divorce action against her husband in 1999.

The judge who signed the document was Moore, Jauregui said, adding that the “D.A.” initials displayed in the yearbook after Moore’s signature did not signify “district attorney,” as many had assumed.

“Judge Moore looked at that D.A. after that signature,” Jauregui said. “No, he wasn’t, he was the assistant district attorney.” He added that Moore’s assistant when he was presiding over Nelson’s divorce proceedings was named Delver Adams, who typically stamped his initials on court filings.

Yet some reporters immediately cast doubt on Jaregui’s argument, noting that Moore’s signature on the court document in question did not look similar enough to the signature in the yearbook to have been lifted directly from the document.

Roy Moore's team is suggesting Beverly Young Nelson lifted his signature from a court document. But they don't look alike… pic.twitter.com/Rb5zNZJqbF — Steven Nelson (@stevennelson10) November 15, 2017

Allred responded to Jauregui’s press conference in a CNN interview with Wolf Blitzer later on Wednesday evening, repeating her call for Moore to testify under oath in a Senate hearing conducted before the election, at which point Nelson would address any questions about her account.

Allred did not directly answer Blitzer’s questions on whether the yearbook message was forged, or whether Nelson had been aware that Moore was the judge who presided over her divorce proceedings.

“There’s a lot that she didn’t mention in her statement, including perhaps other witnesses she may have or other evidence she may have that is corroborative,” Allred said.

She added that she and Nelson welcomed an independent expert analysis of the yearbook message and a comparison to separate examples of Moore’s handwriting – so long as the analysis took place in a “professional” setting, and under oath in a Senate hearing.

In the meantime, she said, the suggestions Moore’s attorney made during the Wednesday afternoon press conference were nothing more than a distraction.

“If he wants to evade, avoid, deny, distract, threaten to sue, try to smear, try to discredit, we’re not going to allow ourselves to be distracted by all of that noise,” Allred said.