It’s on now.

Earlier today we reported that Barack Obama’s Homeland Security Secretary, Jeh Johnson, blew a massive hole in the Democrats’ Russia-hacked-the-election narrative by testifying that he knew of “no evidence that through cyber intrusions, votes were altered or suppressed in some way.”

He also testified that as far as he knew, the Democrat National Committee had rejected the FBI’s help in patching up its system after the DNC had been hacked — a most suspicious move if a foreign power really was orchestrating a conspiracy to help the GOP win the 2016 election.

TRENDING: FBI Official Assigned To Trump-Russia Probe Admits Bombshell: There Was a 'Get Trump' Attitude

Well, it seems that ousted ex-DNC Chair, Democrat Congresswoman, and notorious left-wing hack Debbie Wasserman Schultz is none too pleased with Johnson’s testimony. The Washington Examiner reports:

“At no point during my tenure at the DNC did anyone from the FBI or any other government agency contact or communicate with me about Russian intrusion on the DNC network. It is astounding to me that the chair of an organization like the DNC was never contacted by the FBI or any other agency concerned about these intrusions,” Wasserman Schultz said in a statement. “As a member of Congress, I had the unique clearance to hear any classified briefing that would be involved in such an intrusion, and the FBI clearly should have come to me with that information. They did not” […] “If the FBI or any other government agency ever came to me with that information, I would have gladly welcomed their help,” she said. “In fact, back in March, former FBI Director Jim Comey testified that he wished he had personally done more to notify the DNC of the Russian intrusion.”

That’s a stark contrast from Johnson’s recollection:

Johnson said he was told the FBI had spoken with the DNC, which instead decided to rely on a private cybersecurity firm for help. “My interest in helping them was definitely of nonpartisan interest, and I recall very clearly that I was not pleased that we were not in there helping them patch this vulnerability,” he said.

So let’s see: one one side, we have the word of an Obama administration official, with no incentive to contradict the Democrat party line and every incentive to reinforce it. To be fair, Johnson is admittedly discussing his understanding of another agency’s actions, not FBI-DNC interaction he personally directed or participated in, so he could be wrong.

However, on the other side, we have the word of a notorious, pathological, partisan liar, citing another discredited hack to support her. She has every incentive to lie about this, not only to explain her party’s loss and to demonize Donald Trump, but to defend her own sorry reputation, having been canned from the DNC in part over this very scandal.

In any event, whenever Democrats turn on each other, America wins.





