Tammie Putinski-Zandbelt

2017-09-11 13:49:38 -0400

TAMMIE

PUTINSKI

ZANDBELT

KHADR

HIGH

TREASON

TAMMIE

PUTINSKI

ZANDBELT

IED

UNITED

STATES

AMERICA

OMAR

AHMED

KHADR

TAMMIE

PUTINSKI

ZANDBELT

WHY

TAMMIE

PUTINSKI

ZANDBELT

Andrew Stephenson, I am re-posting as I don’t know if you have already read my previous comments.commented 1 month agoAyan Khadr, I mean Ray,Here are links to the trial video and the signed stipulation of fact signed by Khadr and his lawyer. You posted an opinion piece….to bad for you.What I find so curious about the “infringement of Khadr’s Charter Rights” is when someone commits High Treason against Canada, why does the infringement take a front seat to the repeated acts of High Treason? The Canadian tax payer didn’t radicalize Khadr and train him to be a killer; we didn’t drop him off in Afghanistan with supplies to build IED’s; we certainly didn’t give him instructions to fight Canadian and American troops; we didn’t introduce him to Osama Bin Laden & yet, the government stole our tax dollars to pay for this despicable settlement.High treason(1) Every one commits high treason who, in Canada,(a) kills or attempts to kill Her Majesty, or does her any bodily harm tending to death or destruction, maims or wounds her, or imprisons or restrains her;(b) levies war against Canada or does any act preparatory thereto; or© assists an enemy at war with Canada, or any armed forces against whom Canadian Forces are engaged in hostilities, whether or not a state of war exists between Canada and the country whose forces they are.Omaris guilty ofunder Sections B & C.Khadr is an admitted & convicted terrorist. The majority of Canadians feel this political decision by the Liberal government as a deep betrayal, and, will never accept the Big Lies being trotted out by Trudeau, Gerald Butts, Ralph Goodale, McKenna and the mainstream media Trudeau groupies..The SCoC did not attach a monetary amount or apology to it’s ruling; and the remedy was to Repatriate this killer.A normal Prime Minister would have disputed this lawsuit before the judiciary and vehemently opposed any kind of payout. The legal team could have presented legal evidence which exists to support the position Khadr was an illegal enemy combattant; committing High Treason; was found guilty of five war crimes; was not a child soldier under Geneva Convention, a court did not find that Khadr had been tortured as he claimed.commented 1 month agoOops Ayan, I forgot to include promised links,here they are:construction Video with Omar Khadr (Trial Video)OFv.a/kIa’" Akhbar Farhad" a/kIa “Akhbar Famad” a/kIa “Ahmed Muhammed Kbali”Stipulation of Fact1. This stipulation of fact is entered into by the Prosecution and Defense knowingly and voluntarily in the case of United States v. Omar Ahmed Khadr (hereinafter “the accused”). It is hereby stipulated and agreed, by and between the Prosecution and Defense, with the express consent of the accused, that the following facts are true.commented 1 month ago“Liberal MP assistant who didn’t think my correspondence should be shared with his boss, he did a cursory search and realized I am not a constituent.My response:Dear Martin Leblanc,Thank you for your message. I’m a Canadian citizen and permitted to write to any Member of Parliament. I wrote to all Liberal MP’s across Canada, I spent two full afternoons sending my concerns to elected officials who betrayed Canadians by surreptitiously paying a convicted terrorist without a court order to do so.Omar Khadr was repatriated and that was the remedy, the SCoC did not speak to giving Khadr money or an apology. We know Jean Chretien, Paul Martin and Stephen Harper would have rigorously disputed this in court instead of capitulating in such a devious manner. There is footage of Khadr building IED’s – this is treason and he was never charged with this, or his mother.? Had his father lived, he could have been charged with treason too.Please forward my communication to MP Ginette Petitpas Taylor, I worked very hard to send e-mails and it is my democratic right to do so.Other MP’s have responded directly to my concerns or their assistants have assured me the Parliamentarian will receive a printed copy of my correspondence. I am tracking all responses.Your help with this is greatly appreciated."Andrew, 71% of Canadians were very upset with this political decision to pay Khadr, it backfired on the Liberals. Trudeau’s gross exaggeration of “possible costs between 30 and 40 million dollars”. The SCoC did not attach any monetary compensation or apology. Given Khadr’s conviction and footage of building IED’s in Afghanistan, the court could have awarded him nothing, or maybe one dollar to make a statement.commented 2 days ago (Khadr wants bail conditions to be revoked)The Khadrs, Canada’s First Family of Terrorism, in the Newsby Daniel Pipes Last updated Sept.2/17Excellent chronological compendium of this crime family.Omar Khadr not torturerd