In the clip below from French TV, the popular commentator Eric Zemmour discusses the recent bestial murder in Paris of a Jewish woman named Mireille Knoll. Mr. Zemmour points out that the attack on the murder victim was not specifically anti-Semitic; that is, Islamic doctrine requires the killing of infidels in general — Christians and atheists as well as Jews.

Many thanks to Ava Lon for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

00:12 Good day Eric Zemmour! —Good day.

00:16 Mireille Knoll, an old lady of 85, was murdered in Paris, a murder

00:20 which resembles that of Sarah Halimi, but, this time

00:24 the prosecutor recognized right away the anti-Semitic character of this assassination.

00:28 Yes, there everyone made sure they did not make the same blunders as last time, meaning

00:32 the media talked about it and they didn’t suppress this information.

00:36 The prosecutor recognized the anti-Semitic character, since the victim was killed

00:40 while being called a “dirty Jew” and so on, as usual, and three: the police officers

00:44 have arrested two perpetrators, who are two thugs,

00:49 which is a rather classical pattern, unfortunately. —The two alleged murderers

00:57 they did bestow an anti-Semitic character on this act, but you consider

01:01 that there is no specific anti-Semitism, let’s say “a hood anti-Semitism”, generally speaking.

01:06 —Well, if you want: yes and no. Yes, of course they attacked her because she was Jewish;

01:10 they said so, but what I want to say when I say that there is no specific anti-Semitism, I mean

01:17 that it’s Jews AND Christians who are put in the same bag from the beginning

01:21 for the last forty years, since the beginning of family reunification,

01:25 since… It’s Jews and Christians who are targets.

01:30 It’s not especially Jews. See, that’s what I want to say. And this is

01:34 the interest, if I may say so, of all those acts. It’s that you can see clearly

01:38 the unity that is behind it, and which isn’t understood by some authorities

01:42 of the Jewish community, and so on, who think that there is an anti-Semitic specificity

01:46 and so on. NO. It’s solely because they are French, because they are

01:50 Jewish, because they are Christians, because they are infidels, in fact, as they say

01:54 in the Muslim religion. —Do you think that there’s a will

01:58 to terrorize the population in order to introduce

02:02 a certain unity, in certain neighborhoods, in certain quarters? —Well, that is the result!

02:06 This is the result. That means the result is that for

02:10 decades the non-Muslim populations,

02:14 the population of the ethnic French, the Jewish population,

02:18 from all those neighborhoods, they escape increasingly them and they move, by the way, towards

02:23 what Christophe Gilluy [French geographer and writer] calls “peripheral France”. There are even

02:27 many Jews, the poorest ones, who themselves leave for Israel, and who have transformed certain towns

02:31 in Israel into “peripheral France”. What an irony of destiny!

02:35 Since they live among themselves, with other French Jews, and so on, they speak French.

02:39 It’s a annex of “peripheral France”. By the way, Houellebecq [French writer/filmmaker] evokes it in

02:43 his latest novel. All right. This is the result. I don’t say that

02:47 the thugs who commit those acts are thinking about that. But the result is that

02:51 there are more and more territories composed uniquely of Muslim populations,

02:55 since the others run away because of this delinquency, because of