“Beep” is not a sound you expect to hear coming from a hummingbird feeder. Yet “beeps” abounded during a study led by the University of California, Davis, to monitor hummingbirds around urban feeders and help answer questions about their behavior and health.

For the study, published today in the journal PLOS ONE, veterinary researchers tagged 230 Anna’s and Allen’s hummingbirds with passive integrated transponder, or PIT, tags and recorded their visits to feeders equipped with radio-frequency identification, or RFID, transceivers. This is the same technology animal rescue shelters use when placing microchips under the skin of cats and dogs so they can be tracked if lost.

Similar to when a grocery item is swept across a supermarket scanner, little beeps sounded each time a hummingbird fluttered inside one of the study’s feeder stations. This gave researchers around-the-clock information about how often individual hummingbirds visited the feeders and how long they stayed there.

Such information can help explain how hummingbirds interact with each other at feeders, as well as inform veterinarians about potential disease transmission that could occur from such interactions.

Ruta Bandivadekar, a visiting scholar to the UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, lightly blows on a hummingbird to initiate its release. (Jen May Photography)

In the wild, hummingbird species do not tend to directly interact much with each other. But with urban feeders, that dynamic changes.

“Hummingbird feeders attract birds to gather in areas where they normally wouldn’t congregate,” said co-leading author Lisa Tell, a professor at the UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine. “This is a human-made issue, so we’re looking at how that might change disease transmission and dynamics in populations.”

(Scott Logan/Wild Wings Ecology)

Frequent flyers

RFID technology has been used to monitor hummingbirds before, but this is the first time it has been used to monitor multiple hummingbirds at feeders at the same time, which is critical when studying their interactions.

The study, conducted September 2016 to March 2018, recorded about 65,500 visits to seven feeding stations across three California sites. These included the UC Davis Arboretum Nursery, a private home in Winters and The Gottlieb Native Garden in Beverly Hills. More than 60 percent of the tagged birds returned to feeders at least once — some immediately, some months later. During spring and summer, most visits occurred in the morning and evening hours.

From left, Susan Gottlieb and UC Davis Professor Lisa Tell prepare a banded hummingbird for its release at The Gottlieb Native Garden in Southern California. (Jen May Photography)

Behavioral differences by gender were also recorded. Females tended to stay longer at feeders than the males. And males overlapped their visits with other males more frequently than with other females.

“It’s the first time we were able to truly quantify not only the time spent at feeders but also time spent co-mingling with fellow hummingbirds at these feeders,” said co-leading author Pranav Sudhir Pandit of the UC Davis EpiCenter for Disease Dynamics within the School of Veterinary Medicine.

The science on backyard feeders

Science has yet to make an informed judgment call on whether backyard hummingbird feeders are “good” or “bad” for hummingbirds. The authors note that planting native plants known to attract hummingbirds, such as salvias and those with tubular-shaped flowers, provide a clear benefit to the birds. But given that urban hummingbird feeders are highly prevalent, researchers want to understand the health implications for birds congregating and sharing food resources at these bird buffets. Data from the study is one piece of that puzzle.

Hummingbird feeders hang from a tree at The Gottlieb Native Garden in Beverly Hills, one of the sites used in a UC Davis study about hummingbird interactions, behavior and health. (Jen May Photography)

“The aggregation of hummingbirds in urban habitats due to feeders is the new normal and now it’s time to understand the implications of this,” said co-leading author Ruta Rajiv Bandivadekar, a visiting research scholar in the UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine.

Small challenges

Finding a tracking device for a creature as small as a hummingbird can be challenging. PIT tags, inserted under their skin, are providing valuable insight into their movements and behaviors. (Don Preisler/UC Davis)

Before she was tagging hummingbirds, Bandivadekar was radio collaring tigers to monitor their movements at a national park in India. The tigers' collar alone weighed about 5 pounds, whereas a hummingbird’s entire body is about 5 grams, the weight of a nickel.

Their small size is the main reason finding the proper technology to monitor hummingbirds can be challenging. For instance, before the study, researchers weren’t sure they could successfully tag and monitor Allen’s hummingbirds, a smaller species the Audubon Society has determined to be a “climate endangered” bird.

Regulations require that tracking devices weigh no more than 3 percent of an animals’ body weight, a maximum Tell and colleagues did not want to risk approaching. But the efficient use of PIT tags is providing valuable insight into their movements and behaviors, which could ultimately help their health and conservation in a changing landscape.

Additional authors include Rahel Sollman, Michael Thomas and Peter Klimley in the UC Davis Department of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation Biology; Scott Logan of Wild Wings Ecology, and Jennifer Brown with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Development engineer Steven Lucero with the UC Davis School of Engineering also helped design the feeder units.

The study received funding support from The Daniel and Susan Gottlieb Foundation, Zoological Society of San Diego, UC Davis Interdisciplinary Research Award, Glide Foundation, and Pandit was supported by Christine Kreuder Johnson’s lab in the EpiCenter for Disease Dynamics.