Weapons debris from attack site allegedly shows Aramco attack came from north, US says, blaming Iran.

The United States has said new evidence and analysis of weapons debris recovered from an attack on Saudi oil facilities on September 14 indicates that the attack likely came from the north, reinforcing its earlier assessment that Iran was behind the offensive.

In an interim report of its investigation – seen by Reuters News Agency ahead of a presentation on Thursday to the United Nations Security Council – Washington assessed that before hitting its targets, one of the drones traversed a location approximately 200 kilometres (124 miles) northwest of the attack site.

“This, in combination with the assessed 900 kilometer maximum range of the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV), indicates with high likelihood that the attack originated north of Abqaiq,” the interim report said, referring to the location of one of the Saudi oil facilities that were hit.

It added that the US had identified several similarities between the drones used in the raid and an Iranian-designed and produced unmanned aircraft known as the IRN-05 UAV.

A comparison of vertical gyroscopes, left, involved in the September 14, 2019 attack on an Aramco oil facility in Saudi Arabia and from the Shahed-123, displayed in the Iranian Materiel Display, is shown in this handout image provided by a US government source [US government/Handout via Reuters]

The report, however, noted that the analysis of the weapons debris did not definitely reveal the origin of the attack that initially knocked out half of Saudi Arabia‘s oil production.

“At this time, the US Intelligence Community has not identified any information from the recovered weapon systems used in the 14 September attacks on Saudi Arabia that definitively reveals an attack origin,” it said.

The new findings include freshly-declassified information, a State Department official told Reuters.

The US, European powers and Saudi Arabia blamed the September 14 attack on Iran. Yemen’s Houthi group claimed responsibility for the attacks, and Iran, which supports the Houthis, denied any involvement. Yemen is south of Saudi Arabia.

Oil price spike

Reuters reported last month that Iran’s leadership approved the attacks but decided to stop short of a direct confrontation that could trigger a devastating US response.

It opted instead to hit the Abqaiq and the Khurais oil plants of US ally Saudi Arabia, according to three officials familiar with the meetings and a fourth close to Iran’s decision making.

According to the Reuters report, a Middle East source, who was briefed by a country investigating the attack, said the launch site was the Ahvaz airbase in southwest Iran, which is about 650km (404 miles) north of Abqaiq.

Some of the craft flew over Iraq and Kuwait en route to the attack, according to a Western intelligence source cited by the report, giving Iran plausible deniability.

The 17-minute raid by 18 drones and three low-flying missiles caused a spike in oil prices, fires and damage and shut down more than 5 percent of global oil supply. Saudi Arabia said on October 3 that it had fully restored oil output.

US special envoy for Iran, Brian Hook, told Reuters that the newly-declassified information was more evidence that Tehran was behind the attack.

“The UAVs flew into Saudi Arabia from the north, and the recovered debris is consistent with Iranian-produced materiel,” he said.

“As many nations have concluded, there are no plausible alternatives to Iranian responsibility,” he said.

The US presented its findings to a session of the UN Security Council on Thursday as it hopes to mobilise more support for its policy to isolate Iran and force it to the negotiating table for a new nuclear deal.

“The damage at the oil facilities shows that the attack came from the north, not from the south, as you would expect if the Houthis were responsible,” US Ambassador to the UN Kelly Craft told the Security Council on Thursday.

UN political affairs chief Rosemary DiCarlo stressed to the council that the UN was still reviewing components and collecting and analysing additional information on the missiles.

Iran’s UN Ambassador Majid Takht Ravanchi addressed the Security Council and categorically rejected the accusations against Tehran over attacks on Saudi oil facilities. He described US sanctions on Iran as “economic terrorism” and said “Iran does not negotiate under the threat of a sword”.

Drone parts ‘nearly identical’

In a similar report last week, the UN also said it was “unable to independently corroborate” that missiles and drones used in attacks on Saudi oil facilities in September “are of Iranian origin”.

The report noted that Yemen’s Houthis “have not shown to be in possession, nor been assessed to be in possession” of the type of drones used in the attacks on the Aramco facilities.

A comparison of engines, left, involved in the September 14, 2019 attack on an Aramco oil facility in Saudi Arabia and from the Shahed-123, displayed in the Iranian Materiel Display, is shown in this handout image provided by a US government source [US government/Handout via Reuters]

Washington’s interim assessment also included pictures of drone components including the engine identified by the US as “closely resembling” or “nearly identical” to those that observed on other Iranian unmanned aerial vehicles.

It also provided pictures of a compass circuit board that was recovered from the attack with a marking that is likely indicating a potential manufacturing date written in the Persian calendar year, the report assessed.

The name of a company believed to be associated with Iran, SADRA, was also identified on a wiring harness label from the September 14 wreckage, the report said.

The name of a company believed by US authorities to be associated with Iran, SADRA, is seen on a wiring harness label from the wreckage of the September 14, 2019 attack on an Aramco oil facility in Saudi Arabia in this handout image provided by a US government source [US government/Handout via Reuters]

US President Donald Trump last year withdrew from a 2015 nuclear deal between world powers and Iran and snapped back sanctions on Tehran with the aim of choking Iranian crude sales, the Islamic Republic’s main source of revenues.

As part of its “maximum pressure” campaign, Washington has also sanctioned dozens of Iranian entities, companies and individuals to cut Tehran’s revenue, a move some analysts have suggested may have forced Iran to act more aggressively.