Overall

Vision Vision

Originality Originality

Technique Technique

Impact Impact

Starting once more from the top, we have a light shinning upon the scene with added noise in the background given way to a more rugged and almost trapping place as the dust is held aloft and viewable by the light.Once more, your detail and capture of the face is still impressive as the lips are full, the nose angled and smoothed, with the horns and eyebrows have a proper mix of crispness while being smoothed.I'm not entirely certain if your choice of 4 fingers per hand is purposeful or they are just missing a finger. I will assume it is based on creativity instead of standard anatomy, I hope to learn which it is so I will just put it to the side in this critique.The raised left arm is done well as the pose is rather difficult to highlight both the shoulder, armpit, and bicep. The corresponding hand is a bit thick for the palm but it is only a minor issue where a slight reduction would give it more form to her hand.The dress flows down with smoothed detail and despite the lack of crispness, I believe it is rather fitting to the piece as a whole. If anything, I'm a stickler for consistency and it manages to keep itself well within reason of its surroundings.The hand that lays upon the "stump" seems to suffering from slightly elongated index and middle finger and the hand as a whole appears larger than the other hand when comparing perspectives of the two.The leg closest to the eye(right leg) has enough detail and clarity that is well done while the remaining leg seems to need some touch up here and there as the toes are not as defined and neither is the shading throughout the left leg.Moving away from the figure herself and focusing more on the background. The "tendrils" or "branches" that come forth from the stump are more definite on one side than the other, with those at the right of the image having rapid strokes and more transparent than the left. However, I cannot readily be certain as to what they may be, so for now I will chalk it up as creativeness once again but there are still hard visible lines showing the strokes a little too much and the very top of these "branches" at the right of the image seems to not connect back to the stump as the stroke stops early unlike the others.I find the rest of the smoothness of the background to be fitting, even the almost washed looking feel to the stump itself and the little details to the floor.Yet the floor seems to suffer from a sort of square shading in a few areas(bottom left), making it rather strange. It even approaches the stump at the base and while you can see a hint of squarish shading at the bottom right, it is a bit more hidden and not as noticeable.Overall, I think I went on a lot longer than I should have but it is still a great piece to look at and something I could imagine hanging on wall as either a poster or a painting.Well done.