Eric Striker

Daily Stormer

December 17, 2016



Anne Frank’s Diary is one of the most important hoaxes perpetrated in the interest of advancing the Holocaust racket. The power of this hoax is that it puts a dead little girl’s face on a lie, which puts you in an awkward spot if you ask questions about what really happened during WWII. The book was “co-authored” by her father, Otto Frank, as admitted recently by the Anne Frank Fund, which is especially sick as it explains why there are detailed masturbation scenes in the diary that you can just tell weren’t written by a 13-year-old girl 70 years ago.

Now the evidence is beginning to mount that the diary wasn’t Otto Frank’s first rodeo – he was a highly experienced criminal. The narrative goes that a group of Dutch “good samaritans” hid the Franks during sweeping Gestapo raids and eventually sold them out, but this too is a lie. What really happened is that German and Dutch investigators were looking to crack down on highly lucrative food ration card racket, and by sheer happenstance came across a bunch of Jews.

Times of Israel:

Anne Frank may not have been betrayed to Nazi occupiers, but captured by chance. A new study published Friday by the Anne Frank House museum in Amsterdam says that despite decades of research there is no conclusive evidence that the Jewish diarist and her family were betrayed to the Netherlands’ German occupiers during World War II, leading to their arrest and deportation. Ronald Leopold, Executive Director of the Anne Frank House museum, said in a statement that new research by the museum “illustrates that other scenarios should also be considered.” … The new research points to two men who worked in the building on Amsterdam’s Prinsengracht canal and dealt in illegal ration cards. They were arrested earlier in 1944 and subsequently released, Dutch records show. The arrests also are mentioned in Anne’s diary. Such arrests were reported to an investigation division based in The Hague and the report says that, “During their day-to-day activities, investigators from this department often came across Jews in hiding by chance.” Another possibility raised by the report is that the raid was part of an investigation into people being allowed to work to prevent them being called up as forced labor and sent to Germany. … The entries, the study suggests, show the hiding house on Prinsengracht 263 was tied to activities punishable under the Nazi occupation in addition to Dutch underground fighters’ sheltering of Jews there. “Anne Frank’s diary did provide an interesting new clue,” the study reads. “Beginning on March 10, 1944, she repeatedly wrote about the arrest of two men who dealt in illegal ration cards. She calls them ‘B’ and ‘D,’ referring to the salesmen Martin Brouwer and Pieter Daatzelaar.” The two men represented Gies & Co., a company that was affiliated with the Opekta firm owned by Anne Frank’s father, Otto, and located on Prinsengracht 263. “B. and D. have been caught, so we have no coupons,” Anne Frank wrote on March 14, 1944. “This clearly indicates that the people in hiding got at least part of their ration coupons from these salesmen,” the study states. Other evidence shows that people associated with Prinsengracht 263 were punished by the Nazi occupation for evading work.

So in other words, the Jews “hiding” with Frank, as well as some non-Jews intertwined with the Franks in business, were running a ration card scam while simultaneously cheating the labor conscription system. The Gestapo wasn’t going door to door searching for raw materials for lamp shades and soap, they were investigating gangsters and exploiters and boom: a bunch of Jews.

Jewish internment by the Germans was no less ethical or humane than Executive Order 9066, where Franklin D. Roosevelt did the exact same thing to the Japanese. The damage to German infrastructure by generally excessive Allied bombardment led to many Jews as well as Germans dying from famine.

Otto Frank, the shifty rat, survived while his daughter did not. This was because Otto feigned illness so that he could avoid labor in Auschwitz, and spent the war in a hospital, leaving his wife and two daughters to fend for themselves at Auschwitz-Birkenau. While there, his entire family died of typhus in transit to Bergen-Belsen, while he laid around safe and snug in his pajamas waiting for his Soviet Uber.

The Mirror:

The guilt that Anne Frank’s father felt after his two daughters and wife died in the Holocaust has been revealed by a former penpal. The letters were sent to an Australian woman, who said Otto Frank told her of his turmoil following the deaths of Anne, Margot and Edith who all died in 1945 – just weeks before the end of the Second World War. Writing to 19-year-old Anne Finlayson in 1965, Mr Frank told her he blamed himself for the fate of his wife and two daughters and that he should have done more to protect them. Anne was inspired, like many others, to write to the Holocaust survivor following the publication of The Diary of Anne Frank in 1947. Anne’s diary entries spread across the globe after she began to write as a 13-year-old Jew hiding from the Nazi occupation of the Netherlands in a secret annexe of her father’s factory in Amsterdam. The Anne Frank House in Amsterdam has kept all the letters sent to Mr Frank but his replies were never copied or archived.

This filthy kike died in the 1980s at the age of 91. The real reason his replies to then 19-year-old Anne Finley have vanished is because he was likely using his new found fame at the expense of his daughter in a sexual and predatory fashion. Rather than using his knack for cutting corners to procure food or medical help in starving war time Europe like the Gentiles did, he said “sayanora suckers” to his wife and children and saved himself.

Profiling Otto Frank, we find: a sociopathic criminal, compulsive liar, an amoral Jew.

Anne Frank’s Diary: MYTH BUSTED.