Towards the end of Wednesday’s Democratic debate, Joe Biden Joe BidenSenate Republicans face tough decision on replacing Ginsburg What Senate Republicans have said about election-year Supreme Court vacancies Biden says Ginsburg successor should be picked by candidate who wins on Nov. 3 MORE was interrupted by protestors in the audience at the Paris Theater in Las Vegas. The former Vice President was launching into his closing statement when immigrant rights activists briefly brought the event to a halt. “You deported three million people,” one shouted, a reference to the record number of deportations during the Obama administration. Before they were escorted out of the venue, the protestors shouted, “No more kids in cages!” and “Don’t look away!”

Yet for nearly the entire debate the candidates and moderators did look away from the issue of immigration. That was a shame, as immigration is a topic deserving of substantive discussion — especially in the most diverse state to vote in 2020 so far.

The Las Vegas debate could have been the ideal moment for the candidates to expound on their immigration platforms. In the days leading up to the debate, Democratic candidates were racing around Nevada, courting Latino voters. The state is nearly one-third Latino, and several of the states that vote on Super Tuesday, like California and Texas, are home to significant Latino populations as well. In a debate co-sponsored by Noticias Telemundo, surely there would be a robust discussion around immigration, right?

ADVERTISEMENT

Wrong. Immigration did not come up until the last 20 minutes of the debate. It ended up being a single question about how to protect Dreamers, undocumented young people brought to this country as children, if the Supreme Court strikes down DACA, the program that grants them temporary relief from deportation. Only Sen. Amy Klobuchar Amy KlobucharThe Hill's Morning Report - Sponsored by The Air Line Pilots Association - White House moves closer to Pelosi on virus relief bill EPA delivers win for ethanol industry angered by waivers to refiners It's time for newspapers to stop endorsing presidential candidates MORE (D-Minn.) was given the opportunity to answer, and she reiterated her support for DACA and comprehensive reform. Other than former South Bend, Ind., mayor Pete Buttigieg Pete ButtigiegBipartisan praise pours in after Ginsburg's death Bogeymen of the far left deserve a place in any Biden administration Overnight Defense: Woodward book causes new firestorm | Book says Trump lashed out at generals, told Woodward about secret weapons system | US withdrawing thousands of troops from Iraq MORE jumping in to criticize Klobuchar’s vote to confirm Kevin McAleenan as head of Customs and Border Protection, that was about it for immigration.

This was unfortunate, coming after other debates in Atlanta and Des Moines in which immigration was likewise not addressed in any meaningful way. Consider that debate viewers have heard seemingly endless dissections of the candidates’ respective health care plans, and protracted discussions about whether college should be free. Immigration deserves the same attention. To ignore such a critical topic is a disservice to the electorate.

It’s not fair to blame the moderators for largely skipping over immigration. This was a debate in which the candidates were encouraged to engage with one another, and they did. They brought up all kinds of issues — especially as they dogpiled on former New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg Michael BloombergTop Democratic super PAC launches Florida ad blitz after Bloomberg donation The Hill's 12:30 Report - Presented by Facebook - Latest with the COVID-19 relief bill negotiations The Memo: 2020 is all about winning Florida MORE — that were not raised by the moderators. There were ample opportunities for the candidates to pivot to immigration when discussing anything from their electability to climate change. However, that didn’t happen. Instead there was petty sniping about one candidate who momentarily forgot the name of the president of Mexico.

It would be a mistake to assume that the Democratic candidates for president are in sync on immigration issues. Do they support undocumented immigrants obtaining drivers’ licenses? What would their administration do with unaccompanied children who arrive at our southern border? Should ICE be abolished? The candidates should able to articulate and defend their positions on such questions, as immigration will be the signature issue in Donald Trump Donald John TrumpObama calls on Senate not to fill Ginsburg's vacancy until after election Planned Parenthood: 'The fate of our rights' depends on Ginsburg replacement Progressive group to spend M in ad campaign on Supreme Court vacancy MORE’s re-election campaign.

Meanwhile, the Pew Center reports that Latinos are expected for the first time to be the nation’s largest racial or ethnic minority group in a U.S. presidential election, with a record 32 million projected to be eligible to vote. With Latino voters paying attention this election cycle, ignoring a key concern of the community sends a signal that you are taking them for granted. Sanders and Biden, who are doing well with Latinos, should have brought up immigration on their own. Same goes for those candidates who are struggling to win more support from Latinos and communities of color.

ADVERTISEMENT

True, immigration is not the only important issue for Latinos. In fact, a poll this month by Univision found that health care, improving incomes, and jobs ranked ahead of immigration as the top concerns of Latino voters. But immigration affects the lives of all Americans and it is imperative to know more about the candidates’ views.

If a Democrat does win the White House, he or she will face enormous challenges in undoing Trump’s moves on asylum and refugee policy, improving the conditions in immigrant detention, and re-opening channels for legal immigration. We still don’t know what this all might look like in a possible Sanders, Biden, or Warren administration.

On immigration, the Democratic debate in Las Vegas was a missed opportunity. Not giving more time to such a critical issue was a loss to Latinos, viewers, and voters.