Forty years ago, a movie was released in theaters that late film critic Roger Ebert immediately knew represented something “scary.” [Review, January 1, 1974]

In contrast to Obama’s America, where Hollywood, television, and the Main Stream Media are working overtime to promote false consciousness about crime in America (just watch an episode of Law & Order or remember what the producer of COPS said about wanting to show only reversing the ratio of white and minority criminals (“I do that intentionally because I do not want to contribute to negative stereotypes”) this movie packed a powerful reminder: no matter how much incessant propaganda tries to make people believe a lie, one perfectly-packaged dose of truth is enough to make it all go away.

That movie: Death Wish. To celebrate the 40th anniversary of its theatrical release, a special edition Blu Ray version was released today (February 4). [Purchase here and direct a commission to VDARE.com at no cost to you!] Never has the response of the Charles Bronson character (named, by an amazing coincidence, Paul Kersey) to the rape-murder of his wife and rape-mental ruin of his daughter looked better.

Based on a novel by Brian Garfield (interestingly, its protagonist was named Paul Benjamin and was Jewish), Death Wish spawned four sequels. But it was the compelling manner in which the original movie portrayed Bronson’s actions as justified that frightened Ebert. He said:

There's never any question of injustice, because the crimes are attempted right there before our eyes. And then Bronson becomes judge and jury—and executioner. That's what's scary about the film. It's propaganda for private gun ownership and a call to vigilante justice.

No doubt this was exactly why the great Murray Rothbard praised the movie so much:

Death Wish is a superb movie, the best hero-and-vengeance picture since Dirty Harry. Bronson, an architect whose young family has been destroyed by muggers, drops his namby-pamby left-liberalism, and begins to pack a gun, defending himself brilliantly and uncompromisingly against a series of muggers who infest New York City. Yet he never kills the innocent, or commits excesses. Naturally, even though he is only defending himself against assault, the police, who have failed to go after the muggers and who acknowledge the fall in the crime rate due to Bronson’s activities, devote their resources to pursuing him instead of the criminals who terrorize New York. It is a great and heroic picture, a picture demonstrating one man’s successful fight for justice. As might be expected, Death Wish has been subjected to hysterical attacks by the left-liberal critics who acknowledge the power and technical qualities of the picture, which they proceed to denounce for its “fascist ideology” (self-defense by victims against crimes) and its “pornography of violence” (in a just cause). Don’t miss Death Wish; it says more about the “urban problem” than a dozen “message” documentaries, and it helps bring back heroism to the movies. August 1974 issue of The Libertarian Forum

One line of dialogue in Death Wish cuts to the heart of America’s crime dilemma. While Bronson’s character is at a dinner party in New York City, he overhears a conversation between two guests about his vigilante actions:

Man: I’ll tell you one thing: the guy’s a racist. You notice he? kills more Blacks than Whites. Woman: Oh, for Pete’s sake, Harry. More Blacks are muggers than?Whites. What do you want to do–increase the proportion of White? muggers, so we’ll have racial equality among muggers?

Roger Ebert balked at the movie’s depicting New York City

But as the 1970s drew on, New York City did indeed become a place where “anarchy” reigned, along with all the ills Ebert brushed aside.

Fast forward to 2014: Those demographic groups behind Rothbard’s “urban problem” in New York City now have a true friend in Mayor Bill de Blasio.

And, with the repudiation of Rudy Giuliani’s reforms, it will again become a city with the increasingly “bloody future” that Ebert whined about Death Wish’s depicting.

Today, New York City is 33 percent white, 25.5 black, 28.6 Hispanic, and 12.7% Asian.

When Death Wish came out (1974), New York was 62.95 white, 21.13 percent black, and 16. percent Hispanic.

Only 30 years prior to that, the city was 91.97 percent white.

Our friends at the New York City Police Department put out a yearly guide (Crime and Enforcement Activity in New York City).

The record shows that 1.3 percent (2008), 1.4 percent (2009), 1.4 (2010), 2.5 (2011), and 2.4 (2012) of the arrested suspects in shootings (defined as any crime where the victim is struck with a bullet) in New York City were white.

During that same time, 78.3 percent (2008), 79.8 percent (2009), 74.2 (2010), 72.5 (2011), and 78.2 (2012), of the arrested suspects in shootings were black.

And during that same time, 18.3 percent (2008), 19.9 percent (2009), 23.3 (2010), 23.9 (2011), and 18.9 (2012) of the arrested suspects in shootings were Hispanic.

In short: forty years after Death Wish, almost all gun crime in New York City is non-white.

How about murder victims/suspects?

Between 2008-2012:

Blacks were 61.72 percent of murder victims and 58.3 percent of murder suspects.

Hispanics were 26.2 percent of murder victims and 32.78 percent of murder suspects.

Whites were 7.84 percent of murder victims and 6.08 percent of murder suspects.

In short: between 2008-2012, blacks and Hispanics were 91.08 percent of murder suspects in New York City.

How about rape victims/suspects over the same period?

Blacks were 39.34 percent of rape victims and 51.42 percent of rape suspects.

Hispanics were 38.44 percent of rape victims and 35 percent of rape suspects.

Whites were 16.64 percent of rape victims and 9.28 percent of rape suspects.

In short: Between 2008-2012, blacks and Hispanics were 86.42 percent of rape suspects in New York City.

Robbery victims/suspects?

Blacks were 31.6 percent of robbery victims and 71.02 percent of robbery suspects.

Hispanics were 37.46 percent of robbery victims and 23.32 percent of robbery suspects.

Whites were 18.04 percent of robbery victims and 4.32 percent of robbery suspects.

In short: between 2008-2012, blacks and Hispanics were 94.34 percent of robbery suspects in New York City.

The face of crime in New York City is non-white. (Excellent NYPD graphics for murder victims/suspects: 2010, 2011, 2012).

Ebert was right to label Bronson’s Death Wish “scary,” but he was wrong about why. The fact that, despite all the anti-gun propaganda in school, the MSM, and Hollywood/TV, that this film resonated so deeply proves that Andrew Breitbart was right when he said: “Politics is downstream from culture.”

The subversive essence of Death Wish wasn’t that Bronson’s character went out and killed muggers, seeking revenge.

It’s that one scene from the dinner party, when the racial reality of crime in New York City is repudiated—a powerful reminder that “noticing” is the true crime in modern America.

Because when you “notice,” and pattern recognition develops obvious truths—justifying, for example “Stop and Frisk”—it becomes apparent why, as the black and Hispanic population of New York City becomes greater, the white American population becomes less.

But this bit of dialogue between Kersey and the young husband of his destroyed daughter puts that white flight in a grim perspective:

Paul Kersey: Nothing to do but cut and run, huh? What else? What about the old American social custom of self-defense? If the police don't defend us, maybe we ought to do it ourselves. Jack Toby: We're not pioneers anymore, Dad. Paul Kersey: What are we, Jack? Jack Toby: What do you mean? Paul Kersey: I mean, if we're not pioneers, what have we become? What do you call people who, when they're faced with a condition or fear, do nothing about it, they just run and hide? Jack Toby: Civilized? Paul Kersey: No.

2014 America is a less civilized place—precisely because we have been cutting and running in the forty years since Death Wish came out.