“In 2014, Mourad T. was arrested for the violent rape of then 16-year-old Sofie in the Dutch town of Hoorn. At the time of the rape, Mourad T. is said to have been wearing an ankle bracelet monitor that was assigned to him for a prior conviction. When he was apprehended by police for the rape, Mourad T. sprayed pepper spray in the arresting officer’s face. The following year, he was sentenced to 27 months in prison.” Yet “less than four years later, Mourad’s DNA was collected from the victims of several assaults and rapes that took place in the Dutch town of Horn.”

Clearly Mourad will soon be a loyal, stable, productive member of Dutch society.

Why wasn’t he deported after the offenses in 2014? Would that have been “Islamophobic”?

Why does this keep happening? One reason is because such behavior is sanctioned in Islam if the victim is an Infidel woman. One survivor of a Muslim rape gang in the UK said that her rapists would quote Quran to her, and believed their actions justified by Islam.

The Qur’an teaches that Infidel women can be lawfully taken for sexual use (cf. its allowance for a man to take “captives of the right hand,” 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, 70:30). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful.” (33:59) The implication there is that if women do not cover themselves adequately with their outer garments, they may be abused, and that such abuse would be justified.

“Netherlands: Convicted immigrant rapist charged with three more sex offenses,” by Arthur Lyons, Voice of Europe, December 20, 2019: