Most of us agree that privacy on the internet is important. Unfortunately, those of us that advocate for privacy aren't focused. We rant about a scattershot of real issues, conspiracy theories, half-truths, and aphorisms, and don't focus on how we actually fix things. We need to change this.


It's easy to get caught up in one headline issue instead of actually working to protect privacy on the internet. Similarly, protecting privacy isn't something you do in Facebook comments—it's something we each do for ourselves, and then campaign for on behalf of others. Let's talk about where we're getting tripped up, and what we can actually do if we focus and put our efforts in the right place.

It's Complicated, so We Boil It Down to Inaccurate Sound Bites


Privacy issues are complicated. Like many complicated things, it's easier to ignore them or oversimplify them, so we do. Yet privacy is so important to protect because it allows each of us to make our own decisions. When it comes to things like internet privacy, you fight for the rights of everyone, including yourself, even if your choice is to not exercise those rights.

You've probably heard people say things like "There's no such thing as privacy on the internet." "If you don't have anything to hide, you shouldn't worry." “I'd rather companies know me so they can target me instead of trying to sell me crap I'm not interested in." "Just watch what you post online." On a case-by-case basis, or for specific individuals, some of these statements are valid. The real problem is that they boil down an issue that involves everyone to the perception of one person. Those witty-sounding quotes, perfect for collecting likes and +1s, actually distract us from talking about the real issues.

You Don't Own Your Data Many of us have a protective instinct when it comes to our data. After all, it's ours. Why should… Read more


Every time we resort to a quip like "well, I have nothing to hide," we're stemming a real discussion on privacy. We broke down the ridiculousness of "nothing to hide" a while ago, but the other sound bites are just as easily dismissed. For everyone who doesn't think there's any privacy on the internet, there's someone new just coming online—like a young person on their first device or someone in a country just gaining affordable access, for example—who's wading into the internet we know without a compass. Telling them "there's no such thing" does them a disservice, and assuming that our individual choice to be openly tracked should apply to them is dangerous.

Plenty to Hide Does government surveillance matter if you're not doing anything illegal? It's a tricky question… Read more


We Pretend Privacy is a Local Problem when the Internet Is Global


The Internet is a big place, and treating privacy as a local (or in our case, an American) issue ignores the global reach of tech companies, and the long arm of government agencies. When we hear about foreign issues, we treat them like they're strange and far away, ignoring the fact that those issues very quickly come home to roost. In truth, everyone's plight is our plight. Every time we glance over issues at home or abroad, we ignore the legal precedents they set and hang real people who are impacted by them out to dry—whether they're activists in Pakistan, whistleblowers in China, or consumer advocates in the United States.

For example, most of us see Facebook's ever-changing privacy policies as a mild annoyance, but it doesn't take much to find people who have lost their jobs because "private" posts weren't really private. Even if you think those people should have just watched what they posted, think about the people who rely on those privacy controls to keep their identities secret from governments, employers, or companies that punish dissenting speech. Similarly, when we pretend that it's not our problem when Russia forces bloggers to "register" with the government, we do a disservice to the people who share the internet with us. It could also blow up in our faces if companies decide to keep data on everyone, just in case they need to turn it over.


We Don't Speak Up, and When We Do, We Choose the Wrong Targets


NSA spying is a serious problem, but we need to stop focusing so much on it. I'm not excusing what NSA does—far from it, and we'll talk about how to get involved later—but right now, it's a massive distraction from other privacy battles that we could actually win if people were engaged. "NSA trolling" has turned into a thing: Every new app or feature is met with "and they send your data to the NSA!" It's led to "NSA fatigue," and like any other aphorism, it's a distraction that diminishes the real issue and paints privacy advocates as tinfoil hat-wearing conspiracy theorists.


In the meantime, we miss out on the Trans-Pacific Partnership and its copyright provisions, many of which are reminiscent of ACTA—the treaty that came to light after SOPA and PIPA. We fail to lend our support to Mexican protesters actively campaigning against a disastrous telecom bill that could gut internet freedom and privacy there. We shake our heads at copyright trolls, but forget their method of strongarming ISPs into identifying users actually hurts us. We fail to understand that the debate over Net Neutrality is pertinent to privacy, even though it's made headlines. Since the time for public comment on the FCC's proposed guidelines is right now, now is the time everyone should be talking about it. We're also missing our opportunity to strengthen the USA Freedom Act—the bill that would curb the very NSA spying everyone's aware of. The House of Representatives recently passed a version (read it online here) that's considered watered down at best. It's the Senate's turn now, and it's up to constituents to encourage them to strengthen it instead of pass the House's version.


Speaking of the wrong targets, we also give a pass to the companies that happily suck up our personal, identifiable data and sell it to the highest bidder. We accept the excuse that it's all "targeted marketing," even when it's actually used against us in healthcare, banking, and credit decisions, and that the data is "anonymous and aggregate" even when it really isn't. We assume that even if we're okay with such targeted data collection, everyone else is, too. We point at huge companies—who definitely have real problems that need to be addressed—and ignore easily defeated companies like KlearGear, who'll subpeona Yelp for your information and sue you if you leave a negative review (even though courts have ruled they can't.) We ignore the fact that LG's new privacy policy says they can collect specific data on everything you watch on their new Smart TVs, even if it's your own media, and if you decline their privacy policy, your expensive Smart TV is stripped of all of its features. All of these are campaigns easily won if we paid attention to them. Plus, they'd turn into legal precedent that would be useful against those big companies we're busy complaining about instead.

FTC Asks Congress To Require Transparency From Data Brokers Who would you say knows the most about you? Your family or friends, perhaps? Wrong. You likely have Read more


So What Should We Do?


So far, we've talked about the problems that plague the current privacy debate, and some issues that probably need more attention than they're getting. Part of the problem is that between security and privacy, there's just so much going on that it's difficult to get a complete picture. For those of us who actually want to make a difference, though, there's plenty you can do:


In a way, the internet privacy discussion is easily sidetracked by debates over individual preferences and the myriad angles from which you can approach the issue: Corporate versus government, local versus international, personal versus societal. The important thing is that we focus on the right issues, not get sidetracked by red herrings and navel gazing, and make sure to speak up to protect everyone's privacy, even when we don't care about our own, or think it's at risk.

Advertisement