As of March 22nd, Joe Biden leads Bernie Sanders in delegates 1,201 to 896. Whoever first achieves 1,991 delegates (of 3,979) becomes the Democratic candidate for the general election in November. That means whoever wins the Democratic primary must also be capable of beating Trump. Duh.

Unfortunately, under no circumstance will Biden beat Trump in the 2020 presidential election. Not even with all this flu bullshit ravaging the economy. Biden is not only a bad candidate, but I am willing to explicitly declare that he appears to be a bad person, too.

It may be that he’s just such a bumblefuck moron that he keeps hurting Americans on accident, but to make my bias clear now, after all the research I’ve done and all the links and writing before you, I do not think Joseph Biden Jr is just bumblefuckling about. Evidently, there’s more to it. But you decide for yourself.

Listed extensively below are all the actions, policy decisions, and reasons I could find to prove why Biden, in fact, cannot beat Trump in the general election. Biden is not viable competition against an incumbent who happens to be just a Republican version of Biden. If Americans are forced to choose between two bumblefuck failsons, incumbent Trump with a tsunami of corporate corruption at his back wins that contest hands-down, guaranteed.

You must understand that Trump, moreso the team of truly skilled experts behind him, want to compete against Biden in the general election because they already know they will definitely win against him. How? They also know all this shit I’m about to tell you. They also have Google.

So here’s what I know about Biden, here’s what you should know about Biden before you vote for him, and here’s what the opposition already knows about Biden.

TLDR He fucking sucks.

WARNING: NO MORE TLDRS. THIS IS LONG AS HELL.

Biden Will Definitely Cut Social Security and Medicare

Biden will never appeal to people who know his history and also care about Social Security and Medicare/healthcare. Why? Historically he’s always discredited those programs, or even attacked them alongside Republicans. I shouldn’t have to say this, but for a “Democrat” to frequently side with Republicans in gutting social programs proves that Biden is not a competent social liberal by any definition.

You can read about Biden’s history of lacerating social programs on The Intercept: FACT CHECK: JOE BIDEN HAS ADVOCATED CUTTING SOCIAL SECURITY FOR 40 YEARS

Biden has attacked social security even very recently:

“…at a Brookings Institution event in April 2018, Biden addressed Social Security again. “Paul Ryan was correct when he did the tax code. What’s the first thing he decided we had to go after? Social Security and Medicare. Now, we need to do something about Social Security and Medicare,” Biden said, then added in a whisper: “That’s the only way you can find room to pay for it.”

Here, watch him say it yourself:

This is the truth, in his own words.

“[Biden:] I tried with Senator Grassley back in the 1980s to freeze all government spending, including Social Security, including everything.”

“[Biden:] When I introduced my budget freeze proposal years ago, the liberals of my party said, ‘It’s an awful thing you are doing, Joe. All the programs we care about, you are freezing them — money for the blind, the disabled, education and so on,’” Biden continued. “My argument then is one I make now, which is the strongest, most compelling reason to be for this amendment — or an amendment — that if we do not do that, all the things I care most about are going to be gone — gone.”

“At Iowa’s Jefferson-Jackson dinner in November 2007, weeks from the Iowa caucus, Biden again returned to Social Security. “The American people know we have to fix Social Security,” he said. “They know we can’t grow our way to a solution. They know we’re going to have to make some tough decisions. They’re ready to make those decisions. They’re ready to step up. We have to be ready to straightforwardly tell them what we’re about to do.”

“… We need a pro-growth, progressive tax code that treats workers as job creators, as well, not just investors; that gets rid of unproductive loopholes like stepped-up basis; and it raises enough revenue to make sure that the Social Security and Medicare can stay,it still needs adjustments, but can stay; and pay for the things we all acknowledge will grow the country.”

A final noteworthy quote from the end of the article: “When the program is popular, “adjustment” is a Washington euphemism for cuts. But you can count on Trump to use the more common term” [“cuts”, when describing Biden’s actions].

Biden Opposes Medicare for All and Single-Payer Healthcare

Biden does not support single-payer healthcare, which is the fundamental quality that makes a healthcare system stable. That is, there must be a coalescent influence (in this case, a “single-payer”, ie the government) with real power to guide how the market operates and thus what terms are available to choose from. Individual consumers do not actually have that power. Biden is explicitly denying you this. He wants things to (effectively) stay as they are right now. They are inarguably bad right now.

In case you hadn’t heard.

From the Advisory Board, a healthcare think-tank and medical standards organization: Biden just weighed in on ‘Medicare for All’

“Former Vice President Joe Biden, who is seeking the 2020 Democratic nomination for president, during a campaign event on Monday called for allowing all U.S. residents to have the option to buy into Medicare — but he did not call for moving the United States to a single-payer health system.”

“[Biden:] Whether you’re covered through your employer or on your own or not, you all should have a choice to be able to buy into a public option plan for Medicare,” he said, adding, “Your choice. And if the insurance company isn’t doing the right thing by you, you should have another choice.”

But public healthcare doesn’t work if you have a “choice” to pay in. We all have to contribute just like taxes, precisely so that we each only have to contribute very little. The fewer the contributors, the more participants pay.

“Biden also said policymakers must protect the ACA. “Affordable health care was a huge step forward, the ACA in our country,” Biden said. He continued, “We have to stop [the Trump] administration’s effort to gut it first, and then we have to move on and finish the job and make health care a right.” Biden said, “Health care is a right, not a privilege.”

However, the ACA is what we have now. Is it working well? No. Does it feel like a right or a privilege when no one but the rich are getting tested for SARS2 in America? The ACA was a massive handout to private insurers whom you contract with using the ACA’s own exchanges. It helped relatively few people, though undeniably it saved lots of people some money. But look around you.

Biden explicitly intends to protect that state of failure, which happens to be mechanically nearly identical to the state of failure that preceded the ACA. He’s not actually promising you anything.

Continuing:

“But Biden did not express support for so-called “Medicare-for-All” proposals that would shift the United States to a single-payer health system, highlighting a divide among Democratic policymakers and presidential candidates.”

For clarity, Biden explicitly doesn’t want Medicare-for-All.

“According to the [Washington] Post, Biden’s policy adviser said Biden shares the goal of “achiev[ing] universal health care,” but thinks policymakers should build on the ACA and implement more incremental approaches instead of replacing the United States’ current health care system with a single-payer system.”

We’re 8 years in on the ACA, and at the time of writing nearly every element of the US economy is crippled by a fucking flu.

This Axios article largely reiterates the above, but for redundancy: Axios Vitals

Again, Biden is promising you nothing more than a modified version of what we have now, and he’s explicitly denying you the only reasonable option on the table (some form of single-payer system with universal coverage). Please remember: By GDP, the US is the richest nation in all of human history, but also the US is literally the only developed industrialized nation that doesn’t have a single-payer healthcare system. The. Only. One.

Everything Biden says about ACA is incorrect, period. The proof is in the pudding. Look out the window of the building you’re probably quarantined inside of right now. He’s obviously wrong.

Biden Probably Still Supports the Hyde Amendment

The Hyde Amendment is a provision of law that states federal funds cannot be used to pay for abortion except in life-saving circumstances. Regardless one’s preference, we can all admit that liberals are generally pro-choice. Biden certainly does not represent the majority of his supposed voting base.

From The Hill 06/05/2019: Biden campaign confirms he supports Hyde Amendment

“… Biden’s presidential campaign confirmed that he still supports a controversial ban prohibiting the use of federal funds for certain abortion services.“

“Biden has never changed his support for Hyde Amendment, the campaign clarified.” Biden is Roman Catholic. He opposes abortion. To anyone who thinks he might protect pro-choice interests, you’re being ridiculous.

“Coincidentally”, Biden changed his opinion the very next day, after other Democratic candidates torched his ass for the policy. Here’s Fox News baiting libs about it, as they are want to do: Biden caves after being battered on abortion by media, liberal rivals

Also, from When Joe Biden Voted to Let States Overturn Roe v. Wade by New York Times, we learn that:

In 1973, Biden expressed that the Supreme Court went “too far” on abortion rights with Roe v Wade. “[Biden] told an interviewer the following year that a woman shouldn’t have the “sole right to say what should happen to her body.”

In 1982, Biden voted in approval of an amendment that would allow states to overturn the Supreme Court’s decision on Roe v Wade.It failed, but when it returned in 1983, Biden flipped and voted against it.

Both past and present, he’s opposed abortion. Also worth noting, his campaign handlers frequently decline to clarify his current policies on abortion. They’re hiding the truth from you. Joe Biden is almost certainly anti-abortionist.

Biden Opposed Busing (Desegregation)

Busing was a practice from the ‘50s of driving black kids to white schools in areas that didn’t have black kids, so white kids and black kids could learn to get along. That’s the best explanation I can give in a sentence, for a matter that deserves much more recognition than that. The busing issue proves that Biden holds a rather unique role in history for his effective, negative impact on black lives in America. This is not just a consistent theme with Biden. Its a consistent quality of his being, across his entire political existence: Biden hurts black people, damn near every chance he gets.

FYI This one’s long. As you will see, Biden is extremely agreeable to being racist as fuck, and has been his entire political career (at least). For a short, 3 minute synopsis, watch this video:

Props to Vox for really putting the labor in on this one.

Excerpts from Vox: Joe Biden’s record on school desegregation busing, explained

“In 1974, a federal court panel ruled that state housing and education policies had been used to keep the school systems of the city of Wilmington, Delaware (which was predominantly black), and its predominantly-white suburbs segregated. … It presented a challenge for Biden, who had supported busing during his 1972 campaign against two-term incumbent Republican Senator J. Caleb Boggs, with Biden including busing as just one part of a larger commitment to uphold the Brown ruling and the Civil Rights Act. But after narrowly winning election to the Senate, in 1973 and 1974, Biden began to vote for anti-busing measures after feeling pressure from his constituents.”

“In one exception highlighted by the Biden campaign in recent days, he voted in 1974 against the Gurney Amendment, an anti-busing measure… Biden cast the deciding vote on the measure, ending the amendment’s path forward… But while the Biden campaign has presented this as an example of the former senator’s allowance of busing, at the time Biden said he opposed the legislation for other reasons. It “would have allowed anyone affected by a civil rights decision from 1954 onward to re-open their court case,” Biden said of the amendment during a 1975 television interview. “Ninety percent of those cases had nothing to do with busing. It would have created havoc in our court system.”

Biden cannot claim he tried to oppose anti-busing measures when the busing aspect was not why he opposed it, by his own admission on TV: Transcript of then-Sen. Biden’s interview with The People Paper

“[Biden] added that busing was an “asinine concept, the utility of which has never been proven to me.”

“Biden in some theoretical sense was in support of school integration,” says University of New Hampshire historian Jason Sokol, who wrote a 2015 Politico article on Biden’s busing record. But after seeing how angry his constituents were, Biden “fashions a politically expedient stance where he could claim he supports integration while opposing busing, which was the means to bring that integration.”

“In 1975, shortly after Boston residents protested and rioted over the city’s desegregation order, Biden came out in favor of an amendment introduced by North Carolina Sen. Jesse Helms, a staunch opponent of civil rights legislation and desegregation efforts. Helms’s amendment would bar the then-active Department of Health, Education, and Welfare from collecting data about the race of students or teachers, and also prevented the department from requiring schools “to classify teachers or students by race.” Helms proudly announced that the measure would effectively end any federal oversight or enforcement of busing.“I have become convinced that busing is a bankrupt concept,” Biden said as he stood to support Helms’s amendment.”

“Biden did not stop with that proposal. In the years that followed, the then-senator would cast other votes and propose other anti-busing legislation, often working across the aisle to do so.”

The New York Times describes:

– Mr. Biden introduced another proposal in 1976 that blocked the Justice Department from seeking busing as a desegregation tool, and co-sponsored an amendment in 1977 that limited federal funding of busing efforts. He continued his efforts that year with a bill curbing court-ordered busing.

– In February 1982, he voted for an amendment to a Justice Department appropriations bill described as the “toughest anti-busing rider ever approved by either chamber of Congress.” A month later, he voted in favor of another amendment that allowed the Justice Department to participate in litigation “to remove or reduce the requirement of busingin existing court decrees or judgments.

And on June 28, NPR reported on a recently unearthed 1975 interview where Biden said that if legislation failed, he would be open to using a constitutional amendment to end mandated busing.”

[Note: This mother fucker meant to amend the constitution in deference to his racist political allies.]

“Biden came to embrace his position as an opponent of busing, continuing to propose measures even after Wilmington officially entered a busing program in 1978. “No issue has consumed more of my time and energies than the question of court-ordered busing of students to achieve integration in our public school system,” Biden said during a 1981 Senate hearing on busing and the 14th Amendment. “The courts have taken it upon themselves to go beyond simply dismantling deliberate segregation as an illegal government policy,” he added. “They have gone on to attempting to force integration by reassigning students to achieve particular racial balances.”

“On June 28, the Biden campaign pointed to a quote the then-senator gave in 1975 explaining his stance. “In cases where a school system has racially segregated by gerrymandering district lines or by other legalistic means, Biden said he supports desegregation by any legal means at hand — including busing,” the Wilmington News Journal reported at the time. “However, for school districts which are all white or all black ‘because of historical pattern not involving segregation practices disapproved by a court’ he is against busing.”

“He’s muddied his record a bit,” Sokol says. “The question is about where he stands on mandatory busing. The answer is that he became one of the leaders of anti-busing legislation in the Senate.”

Phew! We’re almost done with this one issue, but I feel it’s necessary to reiterate and reinforce how common it was for Biden to actively side with extremists in Congress. From CNN: Letters from Joe Biden reveal how he sought support of segregationists in fight against busing

“Biden … serving his first term in the Senate, repeatedly asked for — and received — the support of Sen. James Eastland, a Mississippi Democrat and chairman of the Judiciary Committee and a leading symbol of Southern resistance to desegregation. Eastland frequently spoke of blacks as “an inferior race.”

“Dear Mr. Chairman,” Biden wrote on June 30, 1977. “I want you to know that I very much appreciate your help during this week’s committee meeting in attempting to bring my anti-busing legislation to a vote. … Biden, who would go on to lead the Judiciary Committee a decade later, got his start on the panel under Eastland. Few senators were more virulently outspoken against desegregation than the Mississippi senator, who was known for incendiary floor speeches on race. … While most of Biden’s legislative efforts failed, he was not a passive observer like many fellow Democrats of the era…”

Finally, some additional, fucking paywalled New York Times articles that reinforce (and source) the initial info from Vox:

Biden Hurt Anita Hill, Helped Thomas to the Bench

In 1991, George HW Bush nominated Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court. Thomas skated through Senate confirmations towards supreme office almost unhindered. But then it came to light that in 1981, he had frequently sexually harassed Anita Hill, who worked with him as attorney-adviser. This information was initially disclosed during an FBI interview that was not initially released to the public. No one knew this happened until the FBI report was leaked to the press. Anita Hill had essentially let the issue go before she was forced to testify about it, as a consequence of the leak.

Biden, of course, defended Clarence Thomas. Un-fucking-believably, Biden even went so far as to strike a deal with Republicans to block Anita Hill’s supporting witnesses. Biden was Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman at the time; Biden led the Democratic-side of the agreement to “not require” public testimony from supporting witnesses including Angela Wright. Instead, they took Wright’s interview in private, then released a transcript to reporters “late that night”, outside the regular news cycle in order to soften the blow.

In case you’re unaware, Thomas is on the Supreme Court now.

Quotes from from Politico: Biden’s ‘Anita’ problem

“Biden presided over those hearings as chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, blamed for doing little to stop the attacks on Hill and opting not to call three other witnesses who would have echoed Hill’s charges of sexual harassment.”

“He’s acknowledged that he was wary of the racial dynamics involved. He’s said that calling those witnesses might have killed Thomas’ nomination. He and aides admit that they didn’t anticipate the degree to which Republicans would target Hill personally and that they were outplayed politically.”

Republicans seemingly always outplay Biden. Remember the premise of this article.

Biden has since apologized to Anita Hill. To her credit, she rejected the apology: Joe Biden Expresses Regret to Anita Hill, but She Says ‘I’m Sorry’ Is Not Enough

Perhaps she gave him this same expression.

It’s important to mention here that this contrasts starkly against the fact that Biden also drafted the Violence Against Women Act, which he’s called the “the single most significant legislation that I’ve crafted during my 35-year tenure in the Senate.” Another significant act during that tenure was to dismiss 5 women to an extent so far that he violated the integrity of our systems of political oversight.

For more specific interactions regarding Biden and Anita Hill, surmount NYT’s paywall: What Joe Biden Has Said About Anita Hill Over the Years

Biden’s Got Quite an “Uncle Touchy” Persona

I don’t want to waste time on this petty bullshit, but it’s certainly relevant after mentioning Anita Hill. It must be said: Biden is a goddamned creepy weirdo. Take it from me, we smell our own kind.

Here’s a compilation video of some creepy shit Biden has been caught on film saying and doing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xy07yHAgM4E

And here’s Biden taking zero personal responsibility for being nasty:

“I made it clear that if I made anyone feel uncomfortable, I feel bad about that, that was never my intention,” Biden told reporters on Friday. “I’m sorry I didn’t understand more. I’m not sorry for any of my intentions,” Biden said. “I’m not sorry for anything that I have ever done. I’ve never been disrespectful intentionally to a man or a woman.”

If you say so, Joe.

Biden Destroyed Stability for Generations of Americans with His Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act

Who built the mass incarceration system that today ruins familial stability for generations, especially if you’re not white? Predominantly Biden. When you talk about mass incarceration and prison overcrowding, or the increasingly blurry line dividing prison-labor from slave-labor, you’re talking about the system that Biden wanted for us, and then lawfully put into place with his Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act. He originally authored the bill.

Covering this topic and its implications adequately demands books worth of text, hence why such books already exist (ex. The Social History of Crime and Punishment in America). Thankfully, that means this topic is so well-discussed in so many different contexts that I can pass the buck on this one. Other people should explain this, not me.

Here’s a list of articles to learn about the details and consequences of the VCCLEA. If you aren’t already vaguely familiar, you should at least skim the Wiki. The VCCLEA explains why so many things about America have come to be the way they are today. It really is one of the most consequential acts of legislation this country has ever suffered; a mistake almost every American of any sort participated in; truly, a great shame.

You probably have family who’ve been directly effected by the VCCLEA. It’s plausible they’re imprisoned now as you read this, instead of in rehabilitation.

Welp, Joe Biden wrote that narrative for you and yours.

Biden Advocated the Drug War Failure for Decades

In 1986, Biden sponsored and co-wrote the Anti-Drug Abuse Act “which caused a large disparity between the sentencing of crack cocaine and powder cocaine users”. Black communities were more likely to use crack, thus the laws affected black communities to a greater degree for what is essentially the same drug except diluted and baked.

Once again, Biden positioned himself to assault the legacy of black American families.

And it’s not that he just supported a bill that almost everyone stupidly supported at the time. He, again, personally led the effort to see it made law. And it’s not the only time Biden has taken the wrong side in the Drug War:

Further, from The Intercept: The Untold Story: Joe Biden Pushed Ronald Reagan To Ramp Up Incarceration — Not The Other Way Around

“Throughout Reagan’s first two years in office, Biden frequently criticized him for shortchanging the war on crime and drugs. In June 1981, Biden spoke before a House committee hearing on budget cuts to drug enforcement. “I, personally, am getting tired of rhetoric about the war on violent crime and the war on drugs. … These types of budget cuts certainly would seem to contradict a serious effort to develop a federal drug strategy,” he said. “My patience for action in the drug arena by this administration is beginning to waiver. Just as I criticized the Carter administration for a lack of innovative ideas in this area I will criticize this administration if promises and rhetoric are not soon replaced by results.”

“[Biden] criticized President George H. W. Bush’s anti-drug strategy as “not tough enough, bold enough or imaginative enough”, stating that “what we need is another D-Day, not another Vietnam, not a limited war fought on the cheap.”

“Biden used the expansion of the death penalty to defend the crime bill he helped write against critiques that it was too soft. He emphasized in a 1994 floor speech that the legislation included “60 new death penalties—brand new.”

Biden Sold Us Out to Banks After They Caused 2008 Recession

[This one is out of line with the rest. This one’s for me.]

The “Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008” and the “American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009” were fiscal stimulus packages signed into law following the 2008-2013 recession. The former, broadly referred to as the 2008 “bank bailout”, largely served as a parachute to save predatory lenders from the consequences of pursuing and accepting risky assets. The latter was a jobs and stimulus package that wasn’t a bad response to the problem, but together these acts cost over one trillion dollars… that’s approximately $1,400,000,000,000ish… to start… to resolve a crisis that never would’ve happened under any actual regulatory oversight.

The EESA directed the government to buy up over $700B of toxic assets, such as loans contracts unlikely to be paid in full. The goal was to stabilize the financial markets by giving lenders more liquidity (cash to spend). As vice president under Obama, Biden led in a primary oversight role over both bills. It’s impossible to detach him from direct responsibility for choosing to spend federal funds on toxic assets that never should’ve been allowed to exist in the first place.

Biden also voted to in support of the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999, which repealed certain Glass-Steagall protections from 1932 that separated commercial and investment banking, reducing corruption and risky behavior. Many believe this repeal agitated the circumstances that led to the 2008 recession.

For a great, quick comparison of Biden’s voting record on major issues including these, look at this chart from Tampa Bay Times: How Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders voted on 25 important bills

Now, if you’ll allow me further bias.

I, a moron, feel that only lenders have the data-perspective to foresee trouble within something as complex as a subprime mortgage loan contract/market. As a matter of fact, that complexity was intentional, claimed Bernie Madoff, the guy who essentially induced said 2008 collapse. Complexity deters review; banks used that complexity to operate in a manner not at all dissimilar to a pyramid scheme. New recruits (other banks), for their part, were more than happy to jump onboard, all the way until the bottom on the economy fell out. They didn’t care how investing in liabilities was sustainable, they didn’t even ask most of the time. When someone outside the pyramid finally did ask, Madoff was caught.

In conclusion: The banks took your money, then the government under Biden’s watch took your taxes and gave it to the banks, rewarding them for causing an economic collapse that literally put people on the street and even induced a few suicides (an uptick of 5000 between 2008 and 2009, actually). And unfortunately, history seems certain to repeat itself.

Biden is a Liar, Senile, or Both

The notorious Goldwater Rule states that it’s unethical for psychiatrists to give a professional opinion about public figures that they have not personally examined. Fortunately, I’m not accredited, or even qualified, so I can go ahead and say whatever dumb shit I want. In my professional opinion, Biden’s brain is clearly deteriorating. That, or he’s lying with such simultaneous ease and incompetence that it’s become immediately apparent that he cannot be allowed to have power. Let’s presume the former, more favorable possibility first.

Major evidence of mental decline follows. You decide whether he’s losing it, lying, or perhaps both:

Biden on far right.

Further minor evidence follows. Every sentence for the next 4 paragraph is a different example…

From Washington Post (opinion section), March 12 2020:

“There is plenty of cause for concern [about Biden’s mental state]. Biden recently announced “I think we can win back the House” and promised to ban the “AR-14.” He mistook Super Tuesday for “Super Thursday,” and forgot the words of the Declaration of Independence, saying “We hold these truths to be self-evident. All men and women are created, by the, you know, you know the thing.”

Quite a lot, no? But, what if his brain isn’t melting? What if he’s actually just giving us good ol’ American-built lies? Hard to pin a lie on someone even if you’re certain of it, but proving this liar won’t be a problem. Biden dropped out of presidential bid in 1988 after it was discovered he had plagiarized parts of his law school papers, and also stolen parts of political speeches from the likes of Robert F Kennedy and other politicians out of the UK.

His preferred method seems to be attributing quotes and ideas to the originators the first few times he uses them, but then he ceases to attribute, claims their words for his own, and at times even their stories. NYT describes:

“… the Senator talked admiringly about Mr. Kinnock’s themes and incorporated phrases and concepts after first crediting the Briton. But, in his closing remarks at the Iowa State Fair forum, he did not mention the Labor leader, nor did he some days later in an interview when he recounted the positive response.”

One more thing: I noticed in all this goddamned nightmare-research that Biden just will not apologize correctly. I genuinely believe he has some kind of personality defect. It’s beyond me to support that, but the more you read of his actions, the more he seems like a robot trying to emulate the appropriate human response.

Biden Plagiarizes Better People

Biden steals, and has throughout his entire career. Specifically quotes, effective phrases, emotive gestures, and even “lyrical Welsh syntax” from other famous political figures who’ve inspired him.

From Snopes: Did Joe Biden Drop Out of the ’88 Presidential Race After Admitting to Plagiarism?

(Spoiler: Yes)

Yes, he did. From Snopes

Further, from Business Insider: Flashback: Joe Biden’s first presidential run in 1988 cratered amid multiple instances of plagiarism

Contemporary news article from Chicago Tribune archive, September 24 1987: Biden admits errors, drops out

Whatever Biden is telling you, there’s an unacceptably high probability that he did not come up with those thoughts, ideas, words; even the physical movements he’s making might be an act. Truly, it’s all an act.

Biden Dodged Vietnam and Already Lost a Presidential Bid in ‘88

Joe Biden is hauling baggage like everyone else, but his happens to be uniquely positioned to disqualify him upon the very grounds which he’d attack his only opponent. Yes, Trump draft-dodged Vietnam, but guess who also did that? That’s right: “patriot” Joe Biden, who took as many student deferments as Dick Cheney’s evil ass did (5) and then finally he was disqualified from service… for asthma?

Evidence, from The Denver Post: Deferments, asthma kept Biden out of Vietnam

Further evidence via Washington Times: Biden’s draft deferments equal Cheney’s during Vietnam War

However, in his memoirs “Promises to Keep”, Biden never mentions his asthma. He does mention though his “work as a lifeguard and football exploits in high school”.

Joe Biden Sr, Joseph Biden’s father, damns his own son via Washington Post: JOE BIDEN THE POLITICS OF BELIEF

“I was looking for Bs, a C-plus,” says Joe Sr., who made his son quit football in college because of poor grades. Joe “was never a knock-down, drag-out scholar. That’s for sure. He was primarily interested in girls and sports.“

It’s obvious by Biden’s own account, alongside his father’s, that Joe Biden the Younger has never had serious asthma. It’s not in his medical records and he’s never seen with an inhaler or any related medical equipment. I am entirely convinced that Joseph Biden lied about having asthma in order to evade the draft, or received a politically-motivated deferment somehow which required him to make up that lie.

Regardless what happened, Biden fucking lied about having asthma to get out of Vietnam, just as Trump lied about bone spurs. Biden certainly will not be able to use that against Trump.

And, in case you forgot or didn’t bother reading the previous section:

Did Joe Biden Drop Out of the ’88 Presidential Race After Admitting to Plagiarism? (Spoiler: Yes)

Did the fucking timeline change since then? No. We don’t need to repeat that all over again. That shit already happened, and it already took him out of this same race. We already know what’s going to happen with this.

Hunter Biden is Just “Hillary’s Emails” All Over Again

Joe’s son Hunter Biden is a piece of shit lobbyist who’s been handed high positions his whole wasted life. He’s ripe for an overblown scandal on par with Hillary’s emails, which were relatively inconsequential, but more than enough to help end Hillary’s run with a startling loss. Hunter is easily equal to that stupid email server. His ability to land influential jobs with no credibility after constant mistakes truly is suspicious as hell. He can easily be dragged in order to sink Biden’s chances.

Business Insider: The life of Hunter Biden: How Joe Biden’s middle child landed in Trump’s impeachment inquiry and a paternity scandal of his own

This article from Washington Examiner was quite an eye-opener: Cocaine-laced cigarettes, crack, and vodka binges: Hunter Biden details his drug and alcohol abuse

In 2013, Hunter was discharged from the Navy Reserve after testing positive for cocaine, but it seems that may have actually been a crack-laced cigarette. I don’t do tons of coke, but I know you don’t usually smoke coke because that destroys more than you get from horking it. This happened after he’d received a waiver, for drug convictions, in order to join the service in the first place.

In early 2016, he did coke with a homeless woman named “Bicycles” while standing outside the Kolmac Outpatient Recovery Center in Washington. Don’t get me wrong, I love coke too, but this guy’s an avalanche looming overhead. By fall of 2016, it’s crack. And by November, you get a police report of a “cocaine pipe” (crack pipe) and “white powdery substance” found in his rental car.

Is Hunter Biden driving while high on crack? You must ask that.

As if there wasn’t enough to work with, we also already know that Trump has full control over Hunter’s life, too. Trump has already pushed out Hunter from two separate jobs by political will alone (BHR Partners and Burisma Holdings). Trump and Co. already know they own Hunter, and beyond that they have proven it too.

I am not trying to drag this guy for minor mistakes, but ignoring that he’s made so many would be utterly idiotic.

Biden is a Fucking Warmonger

The thing about American warfare is, only 100 Senators can make the final authorization for war or invasion, such as that of Afghanistan and Iraq. The president can’t even do it (legally). When it came time to make the final Senate approval of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002, just 77 cruel bastards affirmed that agenda with their vote, permitting the decades-long quagmire that followed and continues to this day, 18 years later.

By now you can surely see that I’m going to tell you that Biden was one of those 77 bastards that bought into Bush and Cheney’s lie that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction, and that somehow he was connected to al Qaeda, and thus we had to invade Iraq. None of that was true. American soldiers died for it.

Many, many civilians too have died for this (deliberate) mistake. Biden was 1 of only 77 in all of America that could give final authorization to that action, and he did, and he must take responsibility for it. “Why” he did what he did hardly seems relevant in light of “what” actually happened. He cannot be trusted with severe decisions.

In fact, this wasn’t even the start of Biden’s willingness to invade Iraq. He was onboard with such a plan as easily as 1998. From Washington Post archive, Nov 13 1998: Support for U.S. Stance on Iraq Grows

No surprise then that he would support the same action in 2003. The New York Times: Joe Biden’s Vote for War

Nor any additional surprise, then, that Biden would be at Obama’s side as the president escalated strikes in the Middle East, extending the mistake even beyond his own two terms.

The reality of Biden’s true and genuine war crime in Iraq is not lost on those who actually served there. Recently, a group of US veterans confronted Biden about his support of the Iraq War (video at top of page):

‘Their blood is on your hands’: Veterans confront Joe Biden over support for Iraq war, from The Independent

Biden Didn’t Just Support the PATRIOT Act, He Claims Credit For It

The USA PATRIOT Act was signed into law following the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Essentially, the Patriot Act:

Removed all practical limitations on governmental surveillance, effectively making it lawful to surveil Americans and foreigners alike without a warrant by way of National Security Letters; Legalized indefinite detention of non-Americans (remember Guantanamo Bay); Permits law enforcement to search buildings without the occupant’s consent or knowledge (they can go in your house and fuck with your shit and they are not obligated to ever tell you they did that); Expanded law enforcement access to private business records.

Of course, Biden voted “Yea” on the PATRIOT Act.

Happens Biden also drafted similar anti-terrorist legislation called the Omnibus Counter terrorism Act of 1995, but it was defeated. He’s since claimed that the PATRIOT Act is essentially a replication of his ‘95 Omnibus bill. He’s as eager to claim credit for surveillance programs as he is to make them law. But for what it’s worth, he voted against the wiretapping aspect of the PATRIOT Act. It still passed.

Finally, while Biden could not vote on the extension of the PATRIOT Act after it was changed into the “USA Freedom Act”, it just so happens he was vice president at the time Obama signed it into law.

Somehow, Biden is at the table whenever awful legislation succeeds.

Biden Doesn’t Respect Your Privacy

I know encryption isn’t something anyone cares about, but it matters more than you know, you’re owed privacy, and you absolutely must not concede it. There is an extremely aggressive movement within the US government to literally completely end useful encryption. Still, even if you do care, probably you still don’t want to read my uninformed rants about encryption.

Here instead is a rote list of too many times when Biden tried to defeat or diminish encryption technology, often at the request of industry lobbyists like the MPAA and RIAA. And if I remember anything from my Limewire days, it’s that the MPAA and RIAA are not chill, bruh. B)

All I want you to see here is just that Biden consistently dismantles reasonable demands about your person. Again, he cannot be trusted, and we know that because he has been trusted constantly and consistently fails.

Biden Also Wanted a Damn Border Wall

This is quite inane, but those looking to differentiate Biden from Trump may want to know that Biden voted “yea” on the Supported Secure Fence Act of 2006. The act “authorized and partially funded the construction of 700 miles (1,125 km) of fencing along the Mexican border.”

He even bragged about it at a fundraiser:

Before anyone thinks otherwise, no, I don’t give a shit about this. But other people definitely will.

Truly, it’s not a big deal by itself, but it’s incredibly relevant that Biden cannot differentiate himself from Trump even in obscure policies regarding walls. Also, if it’s any consolation to anyone, Biden’s stupid fucking wall doesn’t work either.

Biden is No True Ally of the LGBTQ Community

Learning to accept some aspects of the LGBTQ community may be the only consistent progress Biden’s shown on any serious issue, but, of course, he’s still got relevant baggage. In September of 1996, Biden voted in support of the Defense of Marriage Act which prohibited the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriage.

In 1996, Joseph Biden made himself an enemy of the LGBTQ community and their interests.He used state resources and force of law to enforce and increase systems that serve still to oppress lesbians, queers, and everyone in between. Since then he may have changed, but back then, when that time actually was, at that time, Joe Biden was an adversary to every queer in America. Anything they’ve earned since then, they took in spite of people like Biden, with great effort against people like Biden, and against Biden’s own vote.

By 2012, Biden finally seemed to grow up, saying “I am absolutely comfortable with the fact that men marrying men, women marrying women, and heterosexual men and women marrying another are entitled to the same exact rights, all the civil rights, all the civil liberties. And quite frankly, I don’t see much of a distinction beyond that.” – Joe Biden Tells ‘Meet The Press’ He’s ‘Comfortable’ With Marriage Equality via Huffington Post

Biden Resurrected Civil Forfeiture

Civil forfeiture is the goddamned practice of taking personal property from people who have not yet been charged with any crime. It was used to break up bootlegging during Prohibition, but fell out of use once it ended until the ’80s. It’s typically done on the presumption that a crime was committed, but “as many as 80% of people who have their assets seized are never charged with a crime” says the Southern Poverty Law Center. It’s one thing to take a potentially stolen car from a drug dealer, it’s another matter entirely to take a presumably innocent person’s property in order to process them as though they committed a crime without actually charging them with one.

The true purpose of forfeiture is to provide additional revenue to law enforcement departments of all sorts across the nation. Quite often though, it’s actually used to steal property from innocent or relatively harmless Americans who do not actually owe their stuff as penalty for their crimes.

Who already guessed that Biden supports civil forfeiture?

For a truly fascinating long-form breakdown of civil forfeiture, please watch this (long) clip from Last Week Tonight with John Oliver, presuming you haven’t already seen it:

In 1983, Biden introduced the Comprehensive Forfeiture Act. Besides lawful robbery, this bill even goes so far as to afford the Attorney General the ability to transfer “drug-related forfeited” assets into the possession of any other governmental agency under federal authority (aka “federal adoption”). It seems to imply that, say if Feds take your truck, that truck could be legally transferred to Mississippi, Puerto Rico, even a US military base in Germany. Local and state agencies can initiate this process quickly, sending your property into federal authority, at which point your legal case is no longer against the local sheriff’s department, it’s against the federal government. This fact is entirely meant to dissuade people from ever fighting back, and it works.

But there’s no motivation to do something that offensive, right? No benefit, no profit?

From the SPLC: Civil asset forfeiture: Unfair, undemocratic, and un-American

“Police agencies also engage in an administrative procedure called “equitable sharing” that allows them to maximize forfeiture profits. Equitable sharing, introduced in the 1984 CCCA, allows federal “adoption” of seized assets, which the federal government rewards by giving local agencies up to 80% of the forfeiture revenue. Law enforcement agencies are thus authorized to circumvent more restrictive state forfeiture laws that might earmark revenue for social services or a general fund.”

Say, hypothetically, there’s an asset crisis in one region. Say, Michigan. Hypothetically, the government could lawfully seize assets in another region… perhaps, California… and move them across the country into possession of another agency. And they could seize those assets from Americans, without charging them with anything, by the permissions given in Biden’s Comprehensive Forfeiture Act.

That’s a crazy example, of course. No such incident could ever happen here in the US…

I don’t want to blow this out of proportion, though. I’ve read a few of the horror stories (short examples here; long; national study). It is possible to get your stuff back. It just takes months and tons of paperwork, thousands in legal fees, and it might not work in the end.

Please visit EndForfeiture.com if you wish to learn more about how to end this civil fuckery.

CONCLUSION

Besides Biden’s Faults? Republican Embattlements are UNDENIABLY Sturdy.

If you’ve made it this far, goddamn; I commend you. I doubt even I read this whole thing, and I was the unlucky bastard who proofed it. Now that we know Joe Biden for who he’s always been, let’s acknowledge the elephant in the room.

Biden is up against one of the most corrupt incumbents in American history. Trump is more than willing to cheat to win, and he already proved he would do that during an election, even going to far as to employ obviously criminal tactics as well as commit further criminal conspiracy to hide those crimes.

Not only is Biden incapable of leading this country, Biden isn’t capable of defeating Trump’s weak ass, either. Not even close.

Incumbent candidates (person who’s already in office) have a huge advantage in elections.

On top of that, a dominant method of vote manipulation is gerrymandering, which is a strategy Republicans have employed to immense success for decades now, even in 2016, which they won, remember? Though they’ve since lost court cases for having illegally gerrymandered the 2016 general election, that has changed absolutely nothing about the state of government that exists today. They STILL WON.

More on the legal battles raging over illegal gerrymandering: The State of Redistricting Litigation from Brennan Center for Justice

And never let yourself forget that Trump still has a real base of inalienable support, even if certainly it’s diminished recently.

Fiiiinally, the last thing I’m gonna ask you to read, for a few days, at least…

It’s undeniable that Trump and his supporters want to compete against Biden in the general election. You decide why that is, I fucking just told you dammit, but here, an easy hint. The last thing is just gonna be a picture. Trump supporters can speak for themselves:

Don’t vote for Joseph Biden. He can’t beat Trump. If you let him win the primaries then Donald Trump will win the presidency.

Wanna gamble on it?

#Bernie2020

DID I MISS SOMETHING?

Use the Contact Form (bottom-right, green button, envelope) to let me know and I’ll add it.

https://bidentruth.com/ – Might as well add this, but I didn’t use it as a source, or even read much of it.