One of sexual predator Jeffrey Epstein’s accusers is trying to resurrect a lawsuit to throw out the controversial non-prosecution agreement that shielded the dead pedophile’s accomplices from criminal investigation, according to new court filings.

Florida federal Judge Kenneth Marra threw out the 2008 lawsuit last month, ruling that litigation was “moot” following Epstein’s death by suicide in a Lower Manhattan jail in August as he awaited trial on charges of sex trafficking.

Yet accuser Courtney Wild argues in her appeal, filed Monday, that Marra’s decision “harmed the victims” — as she asked an appellate court to reinstate the suit.

Wild, who says the abuse began when she was just 14, had previously been identified in documents as a Jane Doe, though the new court papers state she now wishes to use her real name “to encourage other sexual assault victims to step forward.”

She and others filed the suit after Epstein was allowed to secretly plead guilty over a decade ago to a lesser charge, as part of a sweetheart deal that also included a non-prosecution agreement for his alleged accomplices.

Despite tossing the suit, Marra ruled the deal was unconstitutional and federal prosecutors had violated victims’ rights.

“In February 2019, after more than a decade of litigation, the district court ruled that in orchestrating a secret non-prosecution agreement, the Government had ‘misled’ the victims and violated their [Crime Victims’ Rights Act] rights,” writes lawyer Paul Cassell. “But following extensive briefing — and the apparent suicide of Epstein — the district court concluded that it could not award any remedy to the victims. The district court’s ruling turns the CVRA into a hollow promise for victims and should be overturned.”

The petition also requests a court hearing in which Epstein accusers can publicly speak about their abuse.

Manhattan federal Judge Richard Berman held a similar hearing following Epstein’s death.