Fw: Israel Tests on Worm Called Crucial in Iran Nuclear Delay

From:conroy.tom@gmail.com To: aaron@hbgary.com Date: 2011-01-17 16:08 Subject: Fw: Israel Tests on Worm Called Crucial in Iran Nuclear Delay

Interesting. Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry ----- January 15, 2011 Israel Tests on Worm Called Crucial in Iran Nuclear Delay By WILLIAM J. BROAD, JOHN MARKOFF and DAVID E. SANGER This article is by William J. Broad, John Markoff and David E. Sanger. The Dimona complex in the Negev desert is famous as the heavily guarded heart of_Israel_ (http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/israel/index.html?inline=nyt-geo) s never-acknowledged nuclear arms program, where neat rows of factories make atomic fuel for the arsenal. Over the past two years, according to intelligence and military experts familiar with its operations, Dimona has taken on a new, equally secret role as a critical testing ground in a joint American and Israeli effort to undermine_Iran_ (http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/iran/index.html?inline=nyt-geo) s efforts to make a bomb of its own. Behind Dimonas barbed wire, the experts say, Israel has spun nuclear centrifuges virtually identical to Irans at Natanz, where Iranian scientists are struggling to enrich uranium. They say Dimona tested the effectiveness of the_Stuxnet_ (http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/c/computer_malware/stuxnet/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier) computer worm, a destructive program that appears to have wiped out roughly a fifth of Irans nuclear centrifuges and helped delay, though not destroy, Tehrans ability to make its first nuclear arms. To check out the worm, you have to know the machines, said an American expert on nuclear intelligence. The reason the worm has been effective is that the Israelis tried it out. Though American and Israeli officials refuse to talk publicly about what goes on at Dimona, the operations there, as well as related efforts in the United States, are among the newest and strongest clues suggesting that the virus was designed as an American-Israeli project to sabotage the Iranian program. In recent days, the retiring chief of Israels Mossad intelligence agency, Meir Dagan, and Secretary of State_Hillary Rodham Clinton_ (http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/c/hillary_rodham_clinton/index .html?inline=nyt-per) separately announced that they believed Irans efforts had been set back by several years. Mrs. Clinton cited American-led sanctions, which have hurt Irans ability to buy components and do business around the world. The gruff Mr. Dagan, whose organization has been accused by Iran of being behind the deaths of several Iranian scientists, told the Israeli Knesset in recent days that Iran had run into technological difficulties that could delay a bomb until 2015. That represented a sharp reversal from Israels long-held argument that Iran was on the cusp of success. The biggest single factor in putting time on the nuclear clock appears to be Stuxnet, the most sophisticated cyberweapon ever deployed. In interviews over the past three months in the United States and Europe, experts who have picked apart the computer worm describe it as far more complex and ingenious than anything they had imagined when it began circulating around the world, unexplained, in mid-2009. Many mysteries remain, chief among them, exactly who constructed a computer worm that appears to have several authors on several continents. But the digital trail is littered with intriguing bits of evidence. In early 2008 the German company Siemens cooperated with one of the United States premier national laboratories, in Idaho, to identify the vulnerabilities of computer controllers that the company sells to operate industrial machinery around the world and that American intelligence agencies have identified as key equipment in Irans enrichment facilities. Seimens says that program was part of routine efforts to secure its products against cyberattacks. Nonetheless, it gave the Idaho National Laboratory which is part of the Energy Department, responsible for Americas nuclear arms the chance to identify well-hidden holes in the Siemens systems that were exploited the next year by Stuxnet. The worm itself now appears to have included two major components. One was designed to send Irans nuclear centrifuges spinning wildly out of control. Another seems right out of the movies: The computer program also secretly recorded what normal operations at the nuclear plant looked like, then played those readings back to plant operators, like a pre-recorded security tape in a bank heist, so that it would appear that everything was operating normally while the centrifuges were actually tearing themselves apart. The attacks were not fully successful: Some parts of Irans operations ground to a halt, while others survived, according to the reports of international nuclear inspectors. Nor is it clear the attacks are over: Some experts who have examined the code believe it contains the seeds for yet more versions and assaults. Its like a playbook, said Ralph Langner, an independent computer security expert in Hamburg, Germany, who was among the first to decode Stuxnet. Anyone who looks at it carefully can build something like it. Mr. Langner is among the experts who expressed fear that the attack had legitimized a new form of industrial warfare, one to which the United States is also highly vulnerable. Officially, neither American nor Israeli officials will even utter the name of the malicious computer program, much less describe any role in designing it. But Israeli officials grin widely when asked about its effects. Mr. Obama s chief strategist for combating weapons of mass destruction, Gary Samore, sidestepped a Stuxnet question at a recent conference about Iran, but added with a smile: Im glad to hear they are having troubles with their centrifuge machines, and the U.S. and its allies are doing everything we can to make it more complicated. In recent days, American officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity have said in interviews that they believe Irans setbacks have been underreported. That may explain why Mrs. Clinton provided her public assessment while traveling in the Middle East last week. By the accounts of a number of computer scientists, nuclear enrichment experts and former officials, the covert race to create Stuxnet was a joint project between the Americans and the Israelis, with some help, knowing or unknowing, from the Germans and the British. The projects political origins can be found in the last months of the Bush administration. In January 2009,_The New York Times reported_ (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/11/washington/11iran.html?scp=1&sq=january%202009%20sa nger%20bush%20natanz&st=cse) that Mr. Bush authorized a covert program to undermine the electrical and computer systems around Natanz, Irans major enrichment center._President Obama_ (http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/o/barack_obama/index.html?inline=nyt-per) , first briefed on the program even before taking office, sped it up, according to officials familiar with the administrations Iran strategy. So did the Israelis, other officials said. Israel has long been seeking a way to cripple Iran s capability without triggering the opprobrium, or the war, that might follow an overt military strike of the kind they conducted against nuclear facilities in Iraq in 1981 and Syria in 2007. Two years ago, when Israel still thought its only solution was a military one and approached Mr. Bush for the bunker-busting bombs and other equipment it believed it would need for an air attack, its officials told the White House that such a strike would set back Irans programs by roughly three years. Its request was turned down. Now, Mr. Dagans statement suggests that Israel believes it has gained at least that much time, without mounting an attack. So does the Obama administration. For years, Washingtons approach to Tehrans program has been one of attempting to put time on the clock, a senior administration official said, even while refusing to discuss Stuxnet. And now, we have a bit more. Finding Weaknesses Paranoia helped, as it turns out. Years before the worm hit Iran, Washington had become deeply worried about the vulnerability of the millions of computers that run everything in the United States from bank transactions to the power grid. Computers known as controllers run all kinds of industrial machinery. By early 2008, the_Department of Homeland Security_ (http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/h/homeland_security_department/inde x.html?inline=nyt-org) had teamed up with the Idaho National Laboratory to study a widely used Siemens controller known as P.C.S.-7, for Process Control System 7. Its complex software, called Step 7, can run whole symphonies of industrial instruments, sensors and machines. The vulnerability of the controller to cyberattack was an open secret. In July 2008, the Idaho lab and Siemens teamed up on_a PowerPoint presentation_ (http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/science/NSTB.pdf) on the controllers vulnerabilities that was made to a conference in Chicago at Navy Pier, a top tourist attraction. Goal is for attacker to gain control, the July paper said in describing the many kinds of maneuvers that could exploit system holes. The paper was 62 pages long, including pictures of the controllers as they were examined and tested in Idaho. In a statement on Friday, the Idaho National Laboratory confirmed that it formed a partnership with Siemens but said it was one of many with manufacturers to identify cybervulnerabilities. It argued that the report did not detail specific flaws that attackers could exploit. But it also said it could not comment on the laboratorys classified missions, leaving unanswered the question of whether it passed what it learned about the Siemens systems to other parts of the nations intelligence apparatus. The presentation at the Chicago conference, which recently disappeared from a Siemens Web site, never discussed specific places where the machines were used. But Washington knew. The controllers were critical to operations at Natanz, a sprawling enrichment site in the desert. If you look for the weak links in the system, said one former American official, this one jumps out. Controllers, and the electrical regulators they run, became a focus of sanctions efforts. The trove of State Department cables made public by _WikiLeaks_ (http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/w/wikileaks/index.html?inline=nyt-org) describes urgent efforts in April 2009 to stop a shipment of Siemens controllers, contained in 111 boxes at the port of Dubai, in the United Arab Emirates. They were headed for Iran, one cable said, and were meant to control uranium enrichment cascades the term for groups of spinning centrifuges. Subsequent cables showed that the United Arab Emirates blocked the transfer of the Siemens computers across the Strait of Hormuz to Bandar Abbas, a major Iranian port. Only months later, in June, Stuxnet began to pop up around the globe. The Symantec Corporation, a maker of computer security software and services based in Silicon Valley, snared it in a global malware collection system. The worm hit primarily inside Iran, Symantec reported, but also in time appeared in India, Indonesia and other countries. But unlike most malware, it seemed to be doing little harm. It did not slow computer networks or wreak general havoc. That deepened the mystery. A Dual Warhead No one was more intrigued than Mr. Langner, a former psychologist who runs a small computer security company in a suburb of Hamburg. Eager to design protective software for his clients, he had his five employees focus on picking apart the code and running it on the series of Siemens controllers neatly stacked in racks, their lights blinking. He quickly discovered that the worm only kicked into gear when it detected the presence of a specific configuration of controllers, running a set of processes that appear to exist only in a centrifuge plant. The attackers took great care to make sure that only their designated targets were hit, he said. It was a marksmans job. For example, one small section of the code appears designed to send commands to 984 machines linked together. Curiously, when international inspectors visited Natanz in late 2009, they found that the Iranians had taken out of service a total of exactly 984 machines that had been running the previous summer. But as Mr. Langner kept peeling back the layers, he found more what he calls the dual warhead. One part of the program is designed to lie dormant for long periods, then speed up the machines so that the spinning rotors in the centrifuges wobble and then destroy themselves. Another part, called a man in the middle in the computer world, sends out those false sensor signals to make the system believe everything is running smoothly. That prevents a safety system from kicking in, which would shut down the plant before it could self-destruct. Code analysis makes it clear that Stuxnet is not about sending a message or proving a concept, Mr. Langner later wrote. It is about destroying its targets with utmost determination in military style. This was not the work of hackers, he quickly concluded. It had to be the work of someone who knew his way around the specific quirks of the Siemens controllers and had an intimate understanding of exactly how the Iranians had designed their enrichment operations. In fact, the Americans and the Israelis had a pretty good idea. Testing the Worm Perhaps the most secretive part of the Stuxnet story centers on how the theory of cyberdestruction was tested on enrichment machines to make sure the malicious software did its intended job. The account starts in the Netherlands. In the 1970s, the Dutch designed a tall, thin machine for enriching uranium. As is well known,_A. Q. Khan_ (http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/k/abdul_qadeer_kha n/index.html?inline=nyt-per) , a Pakistani metallurgist working for the Dutch, stole the design and in 1976 fled to Pakistan. The resulting machine, known as the P-1, for Pakistans first-generation centrifuge, helped the country get the bomb. And when Dr. Khan later founded an atomic black market, he illegally sold P-1s to Iran, Libya, and North Korea. The P-1 is more than six feet tall. Inside, a rotor of aluminum spins uranium gas to blinding speeds, slowly concentrating the rare part of the uranium that can fuel reactors and bombs. How and when Israel obtained this kind of first-generation centrifuge remains unclear, whether from Europe, or the Khan network, or by other means. But nuclear experts agree that Dimona came to hold row upon row of spinning centrifuges. Theyve long been an important part of the complex, said Avner Cohen, author of The Worst-Kept Secret (2010), a book about the Israeli bomb program, and a senior fellow at the Monterey Institute of International Studies. He added that Israeli intelligence had asked retired senior Dimona personnel to help on the Iranian issue, and that some apparently came from the enrichment program. I have no specific knowledge, Dr. Cohen said of Israel and the Stuxnet worm. But I see a strong Israeli signature and think that the centrifuge knowledge was critical. Another clue involves the United States. It obtained a cache of P-1s after Libya gave up its nuclear program in late 2003, and the machines were sent to the Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee, another arm of the Energy Department. By early 2004, a variety of federal and private nuclear experts assembled by the_Central Intelligence Agency_ (http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/c/central_intelligence_agency/index.html?inline =nyt-org) were calling for the United States to build a secret plant where scientists could set up the P-1s and study their vulnerabilities. The notion of a test bed was really pushed, a participant at the C.I.A. meeting recalled. The resulting plant, nuclear experts said last week, may also have played a role in Stuxnet testing. But the United States and its allies ran into the same problem the Iranians have grappled with: the P-1 is a balky, badly designed machine. When the Tennessee laboratory shipped some of its P-1s to England, in hopes of working with the British on a program of general P-1 testing, they stumbled, according to nuclear experts. They failed hopelessly, one recalled, saying that the machines proved too crude and temperamental to spin properly. Dr. Cohen said his sources told him that Israel succeeded with great difficulty in mastering the centrifuge technology. And the American expert in nuclear intelligence, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said the Israelis used machines of the P-1 style to test the effectiveness of Stuxnet. The expert added that Israel worked in collaboration with the United States in targeting Iran, but that Washington was eager for plausible deniability. In November, the Iranian president,_Mahmoud Ahmadinejad_ (http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/a/mahmoud_ahmadinejad/index.html ?inline=nyt-per) , broke the countrys silence about the worms impact on its enrichment program, saying a cyberattack had caused minor problems with some of our centrifuges. Fortunately, he added, our experts discovered it. The most detailed portrait of the damage comes from the Institute for Science and International Security, a private group in Washington. Last month, it issued a lengthy Stuxnet report that said Irans P-1 machines at Natanz suffered a series of failures in mid- to late 2009 that culminated in technicians taking 984 machines out of action. The report called the failures a major problem and identified Stuxnet as the likely culprit. Stuxnet is not the only blow to Iran. Sanctions have hurt its effort to build more advanced (and less temperamental) centrifuges. And last_January_ (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/13/world/middleeast/13iran.html) , and again in_November_ (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/30/world/middleeast/30tehran.html) , two scientists who were believed to be central to the nuclear program were killed in Tehran. The man widely believed to be responsible for much of Irans program, Mohsen Fakrizadeh, a college professor, has been hidden away by the Iranians, who know he is high on the target list. Publicly, Israeli officials make no explicit ties between Stuxnet and Iran s problems. But in recent weeks, they have given revised and surprisingly upbeat assessments of Tehrans nuclear status. A number of technological challenges and difficulties have beset Irans program, Moshe Yaalon, Israels minister of strategic affairs, told Israeli public radio late last month. The troubles, he added, have postponed the timetable.