Block N. Consciousness, accessibility, and the mesh between psychology and neuroscience. Behav. Brain Sci. 30 : 481-548 View in Article PubMed

Google Scholar

Sperling G. The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychol. Monogr. 74 : 1-29 View in Article Crossref

Google Scholar

Tye M. Attention, Seeing and Change Blindness. Philos. Issues. : 20 View in Article Google Scholar

Rensink R.A.

et al. To see or not to see: the need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychol. Sci. 8 : 368-373 View in Article Scopus (1497)

Crossref

Google Scholar

Noë A. Action in Perception. MIT Press , View in Article Google Scholar

Block N. Functionalism, Consciousness and Representation. MIT Press , View in Article Google Scholar

Gill N.F.

Dallenbach K.M. A preliminary study of the range of attention. Am. J. Psychol. 37 : 247-256 View in Article Crossref

Google Scholar

Phillips I.B. Attention and iconic memory. in: Mole C. Attention: philosophical and psychological essays. Oxford University Press , : 204-227 View in Article Google Scholar

Naccache L.

Dehaene S. Reportability and illusions of phenomenality in the light of the global neuronal workspace model. Behav. Brain Sci. 30 : 518-519 View in Article Scopus (18)

Crossref

Google Scholar

Byrne A.

et al. Do we see more than we can access?. Behav. Brain Sci. 30 : 501-502 View in Article Google Scholar

Block N. Overflow, access and attention. Behav. Brain Sci. 30 : 530-542 View in Article Google Scholar

Baars B. A Cognitive theory of consciousness. Cambridge University Press , View in Article Google Scholar

Sligte I.G.

et al. Magnetic stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex dissociates fragile visual short tem memory from visual working memory. Neuropsychologia. 49 : 1578-1588 View in Article Scopus (35)

PubMed

Crossref

Google Scholar

Cowan N.

et al. The legend of the magical number seven. in: Della Sala S. Tall Tales about the brain: things we think we know about the mind, but ain’t so. Oxford University Press , : 45-59 View in Article Google Scholar

Saults J.S.

Cowan N. A central capacity limit to the simultaneous storage of visual and auditory arrays in working memory. J. Exp. Psychol.: Gen. 136 : 663-684 View in Article Scopus (153)

PubMed

Crossref

Google Scholar

Awh E.

et al. Visual working memory represents a fixed number of items regardless of complexity. Psychol. Sci. 12 : 329-334 View in Article Scopus (40)

Crossref

Google Scholar

Alvarez G.

Cavanagh P. The capacity of visual short-term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects. Psychol. Sci. 15 : 106-111 View in Article Scopus (814)

PubMed

Crossref

Google Scholar

Zosh J.M.

Feigenson L. Beyond ‘what’ and ‘how many’: capacity, complexity and resolution of infants’ object representations. in: Santos L. Hood B. The origins of object knowledge. Oxford University Press , : 25-51 View in Article Crossref

Google Scholar