“A report by Alexis Jay exposed ‘blatant’ failures by police and the Labour-run local council, where officials feared racism accusations at the time. The independent inquiry said an unpublished Home Office research report from 2002 described the extent of child sexual exploitation in Rotherham and a series of criticisms over the response ‘that should have raised concern’. But a large-scale inquiry was not launched until after a Times report on the scale of grooming provoked a national scandal a decade later.”

The Home Office sat on this information for a decade while the lives of untold numbers of British girls were ruined. Everyone who drew up that report in 2002 and then stayed quiet about it should be fired now, and barred from public life forever. They sacrificed their nation’s future to their fear of being called “Islamophobic.” If Britain has any hope of surviving as a free society, and that hope is very, very dim at this point, the entire British political elite class that enabled this massive betrayal needs to be repudiated and thrown out of office. But that isn’t happening.

“Home Office had information on Rotherham grooming gangs in 2002 but failed to act, review finds,” by Lizzie Dearden, Independent, July 18, 2018 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

The government received information detailing the extent of grooming gang activity in Rotherham as far back as 2002 but failed to properly act on it, a review has found.

The National Crime Agency’s ongoing investigation has revealed that more than 1,500 girls and young women may have been abused in the Yorkshire town between 1997 and 2013.

A report by Alexis Jay exposed “blatant” failures by police and the Labour-run local council, where officials feared racism accusations at the time.

The independent inquiry said an unpublished Home Office research report from 2002 described the extent of child sexual exploitation in Rotherham and a series of criticisms over the response “that should have raised concern”.

But a large-scale inquiry was not launched until after a Times report on the scale of grooming provoked a national scandal a decade later.

An internal Home Office review of the information it handled could not locate the 2002 document but found that records were “imperfectly operated” and it may have been received.

After reviewing the internal probe, barrister Richard Whittam QC and NSPCC chief executive Peter Wanless concluded that the government had been “significant and proportionate” and found no evidence of files deliberately being destroyed.

But they added: “The department knew that significant disputes between local agencies in Rotherham existed within the research project.

“However, the Home Office focus seems specifically to have been on the consequence of such disputes for the advancement of evidence that would support a commissioned evaluation, rather than the cause of such disputes.

“Closer consideration of the latter could have uncovered faster the failings we now know were putting children at risk.”

They called on the Home Office to improve its recording of child abuse allegations to ensure they are prioritised.

Sajid Javid, the home secretary, said the recommendation had been accepted and that the department introduced a new referral system in 2014.

He acknowledged that “opportunities to follow up on, or seek further information about, matters in Rotherham including whether the police and other statutory agencies were responding appropriately existed”.

“As public servants, we all have an important responsibility to raise and respond effectively to any safeguarding concerns we may encounter in the work we do – not least allegations of child sexual abuse,” Mr Javid said.

“The permanent secretary and I take this issue extremely seriously and the Home Office will continue to promote amongst all staff the vital importance of using all available information to consider if a child is at risk of abuse.”

Sarah Champion, the Labour MP for Rotherham, said it was “clear that the Home Office knew about child sexual exploitation in Rotherham from 2002”.

“Why, when so many in authority knew the scale and severity of this crime, did it take until 2014, with the publication of the Jay report, for a large-scale investigation to occur?” she asked. “How many lives could have been protected if swift action had been taken a decade before?”…

The most recent abuser jailed was 42-year-old Tony Chapman, who was imprisoned for 25 years in May for raping two girls and indecently assaulting another….