The fact that FBI agents raided the office of Andrew Cohen, President Trump’s lawyer, indicates that it has highly compelling evidence, infers Adam Serwer of The Atlantic. This warrant could not have been approved without the approval of a federal judge, who would have had to see hard evidence to do so. Trump’s claim that his exchanges with Cohen fall under attorney-client privileges isn’t necessarily correct. If they were discussing matters outside of the lawyer’s legal representation of the president, these are not confidential. Particularly so when it’s possible that these dialogues were furthering criminal activities.