The News: An obscure Defense Department IT certification has become the latest flash point in a long-running fight over which West Coast tech company is best suited to safeguard the United States’ national security secrets. In late October, the Pentagon jilted Amazon when it turned to Microsoft for a centralized cloud computing network called the Joint Enterprise Defense Infrastructure, or JEDI for short. Analysts had widely assumed the contract would go to Amazon Web Services, the commercial market leader, in large part because an earlier CIA contract gave it years of experience handling sensitive government data.

But on Dec. 12, Microsoft became the second company to hold the Pentagon’s highest-level IT security certification, called Impact Level 6, Defense Information Systems Agency spokesman Russ Goemaere told The Washington Post in an email. The temporary certification lasts three months, after which a longer one will be considered, Goemaere said. The news of Microsoft’s certification was reported earlier by the Washington Business Journal. Read the full story on the Washington Post.

Analyst Take: I’ve covered JEDI across a number of different media outlets including an in depth podcast, a MarketWatch op-ed and our team has written a handful of articles here on the Futurum site and it has been with great interest that I have tracked the continued developing story around Microsoft’s award of the coveted ~$10 Billion dollar contract.

After its award, it was hard to imaging that Microsoft would not be facing a drawn out contest from AWS as the company would seek to have the decision reconsidered based upon a number of capabilities that AWS has as not only the IaaS market leader by some margin, but also as the only holder of a special DoD security clearance known as Impact Level 6.

While I have been the first to say that superiority in terms of product capability is not necessarily a requirement for the award of a government contract, for such an important relationship like the Department of Defense and the provider of cloud services, I could see why AWS may be miffed if a company that was objectively less secure was awarded such a significant piece of business. Having said that, I was also pretty certain that as part of the award to Microsoft, the requirement to up level its security clearance would have been a contingency of the award. Although the news piece didn’t specifically call this out, that is still what I sense happened here.

I see this step as an important move for Microsoft as the company continues to seek a more level playing field with Amazon’s AWS. Especially as the two companies have separated from the pack of public cloud providers making a bit of a two horse race for superiority. However, up until now AWS has had a significant advantage, and only over the last 18 months has the gap seemingly narrowed.