1. [+332, -183] Why are people calling this original? She has ruined the beauty of the hanbok by making it look cheap and superificial.2. [+244, -155] The drawings are pretty... but I feel like putting the hanbok in a messy setting like that brings down its beauty... not really for it.3. [+238, -167] How dare she bring down the hanbok's beauty like this? This is not original at all.4. [+88, -23] I feel like the drawings are more of a satire on the modern Korean woman;5. [+55, -14] All of the best replies are talking about how she made the hanbok look cheap and while I agree that the hanbok in its original form is beautiful, I think we should work towards wearing it more informally than only in formal situations. Seeing the hanbok in every day settings like this brings the hanbok to a deeper level of relation to our everyday lives.6. [+42, -20] The hanbok is a representation of modesty and elegance and she drew it in such a cheap and superificial manner.7. [+30, -6] The illustrations are clearly a satire on the modern woman.8. [+26, -4] I don't know why people are calling the drawings cheap... If the hanbok became acceptable as everyday wear, this is exactly how women would look wearing them in modern society.9. [+25, -9] I don't think she's ruining the beauty of the hanbok... I actually like seeing the hanbok melt into our modern society. Enough with the idea that the hanbok can only be worn in formal settings.10. [+22, -37] This is actually cool ㅋㅋㅋ It's a refreshing idea to mix modern society with the Chosun dynasty hanbok.