This is what is on my mind:

Labour comes before capital : Capital comes before currency.. And should never be the other way around.. If there is infinite labour, there should be infinite currency.. Currency should never dictate labour.. Labour should always comes first.. Labour and overall productivity should dictate the amount of capital and of course the amount of currency..

There is a relatively infinite amount of labour that can be done on this planet and within the Universe over the next billion or however many years.. How would you fund an infinite source of labour?? This is why when slavery was legal it was possible to develop countries and mega cities because the currency cost was essentially infinite.. The labour cost however was tremendously expensive and countless people have suffered through lack of knowledge..

With an infinite source of money?? Which there technically is because it isn't backed by anything of value nowadays.. Now the ultimate question is.. Who should control this infinite supply of money?? Or should this source of money simply be monitored very effectively like being totally transparent to the public so that no one defrauds the system..

Why is an infinite source of money bad for pure capitalists?? Because a private company with limited funds can never compete with a public company with unlimited funds.. Why would you want to own a hospital and profit off off other people's misery.. The only way that a hospital could be owned is if a government or a public structure has a limited budget.. Why though should a government have a limited budget?? It's budget should be determined by it's productivity and not the budget determine the productivity.. The crux of the matter is is that there is any unlimited amount of labour available.. So long as there is an infinite source of energy there will be an infinite source of labour.. We should therefore also have an infinite source of currency, which we currently do not have..

Another point I would like to make is this: Imagine a world in which every living being did not want to share any information.. We would all be mutes and totally dumb.. No parent to nurture us or even to feed us.. We will all have died a loooooooooooooooong time ago..

Only the greediest of people would want to own information in a legal sense so that they could keep it to themselves.. (as if they deserved all the credit for stumbling onto that information first - as in they fed and raised themselves, developed a complex language, etc, etc) Keep it to themselves so that they could mislead people and profit off their lack of knowledge..

We are individuals that are a culmination of our immensely detailed surroundings.. We should share as much information with each other as we can.. Some people are naturally gifted and will most of the time have an edge over the rest but that is the natural order of things.. This is my dream and if the Internet has taught me one thing.. It's that sharing is the only way we can progress..