written by David Steffen

One of the aspects of the craft writing that never seems to get much discussion is the choice of title.Â Now, certainly there are lots of other things you need to work on, endings, the beginning hook, characterization, so on.Â And those other things are more likely to affect your chances at making a sale.Â But titles do matter.Â At the very least they can be the icing on the cake.Â At the most they can make the story itself more memorable and thus easier to recommend and discuss (always an important thing).Â Their value is less obvious and harder to measure.

So, here’s a list of factors when choosing a great title.Â I’ll give at least one good and bad examples for each.Â Keep in mind that I’m only commenting on the choice of title, not the story itself.Â And I’m certainly not proud of every title I’ve created for my own stories.Â Note, I do also include some movies and video games in these entries, because titles are equally important in those media.

Factors for a Great Title

1.Â Is it compelling?

When you hear the best titles, they just make you WANT to read the story, even without knowing anything else about them.Â A story needs to draw you in, but even before you read the opening paragraph, you’re going to see the title in the table of contents of the magazine, or on the spine of the book at a bookstore.

Good:

The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, written by Douglas Adams

Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, directed by Michael Gondry

Through the Looking Glass, and What Alice Found There, written by Lewis Carroll

Bad:

Prey, written by Michael Crichton

This is a stock title that doesn’t really tell you anything interesting about the story, a tale of self-modifying nanobot swarms escaped from laboratories.Â It doesn’t help that a video game came out within a couple years of this with the same title but having no relation whatsoever to the Crichton book, about a Native American alien abductee trying to fight his way off the spacecraft.

The Bride of Frankenstein, written by Mike Resnick

There have been so many Frankenstein’s monster media tie-ins over the years that mentioning “Frankenstein” in the title actually lowers my interest a bit, unless something about it would imply that the setting or details were wildly different than the original.Â Which this title doesn’t.

The Old Man and the Sea, written by Ernest Hemingway

The title is certainly accurate, but it really does not make me want to read the story.

2.Â Is it memorable?

When a story really becomes popular, much of the reason for its popularity are word-of-mouth recommendations.Â To really allow word-of-mouth to do have its full effect, the title needs to be memorable.Â If you think of the storyline then the title should spring to mind.

Good:Â The Merchant and the Alchemist’s Gate, written by Ted Chiang

The Tell-Tale Heart, written by by Edgar Allen Poe

Bad:Â The Loneliness of the Long-Distance Diplomat, written by Matthew Sanborn Smith

This is a great, hilarious story.Â But I have a bugger of a time remembering the title because the story doesn’t call this title to mind at all.

3.Â Is it evocative?

The memory association between title and story is a two way street.Â If you hear the title, the story should spring to mind.Â It helps to avoid cliched phrases, because they already have existing associations.Â But new variations of cliched phrases can make very evocative titles.Â Again, this can be very important to promote discussion.Â If someone asks you if you’ve read Book X, if the title evokes nothing for you there’s less chance of a real discussion happening.

Good:

The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe, written by C.S. Lewis

Deus Ex (PC Game), produced by Eidos

This is an example of a common phrase being expressed in a new way.Â This is part of the phrase “deus ex machina”, literally “god from a machine”, usually used to refer to a last-minute savior that solves an apparently unsolvable problem.ÂÂ The protagonist of this game is a deus ex machina in this sense, but he is also nano-augmented, essentially gaining godlike powers through technology, making him a sort of god from a machine.ÂÂÂ Truncating the original phrase makes it more distinct, and more brief, packing a lot of meaning into just six letters.

Bad:Â The Bear in the Cable-Knit Sweater, written by Robert T. Jeschonek

The word “bear” is certainly relevant to the story, but the sweater has no real importance.Â So when I hear this title it leads my associative memory down roads that don’t relate to this story.

Dragons of Autumn Twilight, written by Margaret Weis and Tracy Hickman

This title is just lazy.Â It tells you that there are dragons in the book, but it’s part of a series called Dragonlance so that is hardly a surprise.

4.Â Does it match the tone of the story?

Generally, it’s a good idea to have the tone of the title match the tone of the story.Â A humorous title hints at a humorous story; a dark title hints at a dark story, etc…

There are definitely exceptions to this one.Â For instance, S. Boyd Taylor’s “Teddy Bears and Tea Parties.”Â The title is light and childish, but that’s a very dark one.Â But in that story the mismatch is clearly an intentionally contrasting choice and does well as a title.

Good:Â Just a Couple of Highly Experimental Weapons Tucked Away Behind the Toilet Paper, written by Adam Troy Castro

Extremely long titles tend to give a humorous slant.Â Funny story, funny title here.

What They Consumed, written by Helmut Finch

Dark story, dark title.

Bad:Â Cloverfield, directed by Matt Reeves

5.Â Does it keep its promise?

A title shouldn’t write a check that its story can’t cash.

Good:Â Biographical Notes to ‘A Discourse on the Nature of Causality, with Air-Planes’, by Benjamin Rosenbaum, written by Benjamin Rosenbaum

Philosophy on a blimp with a character sharing the name of the author in a parallel universe.Â It matches the title quite well.

Eight Heads in a Duffel Bag, directed by Tom Schulman

I haven’t actually seen this movie, but according to synopses there is actually a duffelbag full of heads.Â With a title like that, you’ve gotta follow through.

Snakes on a Plane, directed by David R. Ellis

This one’s a late entry to the list, suggested by Marshal.Â But it was such a good example I couldn’t pass it up.

Bad:Â Evil Robot Monkey, written by Mary Robinette Kowal

For obvious reasons I began reading thisÂ story anticipating an evil robot monkey.Â The story contained no evil, no robot, and no monkey.Â It’s not that the story was bad, but with that title, anything that didn’t actually fulfill the title is bound to disappoint.

Let Us All Praise Awesome Dinosaurs, written by Leonard Richardson

This story did not make me want to praise dinosaurs, nor did anyone in the story praise any dinosaurs.Â There were at least dinosaurs in it, though, so it gets partial credit.

6.Â Is it related to the story’s kernel?

Ideally, a title will relate to the core idea, the kernel, the theme of the story.

Good:Â Friction, written by Will McIntosh

Friction is the number one concern of the protagonist, and is the motivation behind most of his life’s decisions, as well as being a major factor in the climax and the resolution.

The Matrix, directed by Andy and Larry Wachowski

Bad:Â The Gathering Storm, written by Robert Jordan and Brandon Sanderson

This does relate to the events of the book as the series approaches its resolution, presumably centered around the Last Battle.Â The storm does relate to that but is by no means the kernel of this particular book.

The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, written by Stieg Larson

The girl does indeed have a dragon tattoo.Â It’s an interesting detail that certainly helps contribute to characterization and gives her an unmistakable feature.Â But it has pretty much nothing to do with the story’s kernel.

7.Â Is the meaning of the title clear?

Good:Â Cursed, written by Jeremy C. Shipp

We know from right at the beginning that the protagonist is cursed, and his biggest desire is to remove that curse.

City of Golden Shadow, written by Tad Williams

Again, the primary motivating factor is right in the title.

The Amazing Maurice and His Educated Rodents, written by Terry Pratchett



Bad:Â Knife of Dreams, written by Robert Jordan

Based on a quote also written by the author.Â The trouble is that I never remember the meaning of the quote and it doesn’t seem to have much to do with anything.Â Not only that, but some of the other titles refer to specific objects, such as “Crown of Swords”, and this sounds like another one of those.Â Add to that the fact that the World of Dreams is a major setting in the series, and it seems pretty clear that this is a magical object.Â So I kept waiting for that darned knife to show up.

More Full of Weeping Than You Can Understand, written by Rosamund Hudge

I looked this up after listening to the story, it’s pulled from a Yeats poem about Fae changelings.Â Knowing that, it certainly relates, but that only helps if you know the Yeats quote.Â That’s the trouble making titles based on quotes, they’re generally only meaningful if you know the quote.Â I kept waiting for it to make sense while I was reading, and then it never did.

Perilous Seas by Dave Duncan

Much of his Man of His Word series takes place crossing from country to country by ocean.Â The seas are perilous from time to time, but no more so in this book than the others.Â All four titles of this series were taken from a passage from The Rubayyat of Omar Khayyam, and seemingly plucked phrases at random from it, though none of them were particularly good titles, with two of them seeming to be entirely unrelated to their book.

What goes around

As I said before a bad title doesn’t mean it’s a bad story and probably doesn’t have much to do with editorial selection.Â Lest anyone complain about me picking on other writers’ titles, I’ll pick on my own a bit as well.

To date I’ve seen four of my stories published, so I’ll comment on them here for each of the categories I’ve listed.Â I would comment on others, but I enter some contests like Writers of the Future where anonymity of stories is mandatory, so I don’t want to risk losing eligibility on those stories.Â I’ll give each of them a score from 1-10, 10 being the highest, 1 being lowest, 5 being average.

An SF story set in a future where phone dependence has grown to such a degree that everyone is attached to phone symbiotes after being born.Â This story centers around those who have been disconnected from their phones (once disconnected you cannot be reconnected).

1.Â Compelling?Â 6

2.Â Memorable?Â 6

Funny story:Â I set up a Google Alert search for this story, and for months I kept getting hits that said “Jesus Loves the Disconnected”.Â Good to know that he’s a fan.

3.Â Evocative?Â 3

“Disconnected” is simply too common a word to be extremely evocative.

4.Â Tone?Â 4

Story is darker than the title.

5.Â Keeps promise?Â N/A

It doesn’t really promise anything with the title

6.Â Story kernel?Â 10

7.Â Clear meaning?Â 10

A horror retelling of The Wonderful Wizard of Oz.Â It begins with Dorothy’s house landing in Munchkinland, but the Tin Man here is very different than the original book’s version, truly compassionless.

1.Â Compelling?Â 10

2.Â Memorable? 10

3.Â Evocative?Â 10

4.Â Tone?Â 7

The cold, calculating of “utility” matches well the Tin Man’s cold manner of thinking.Â But Dorothy would likely not agree that the tone is right.

5.Â Keeps its promise?Â N/A

Doesn’t really promise anything with the title.

6.Â Story Kernel?Â 10

7.Â Clear meaning?Â 10

A flash story about anÂ alien autopsy from the point of view of the alien.

1.Â Compelling?Â 2

It’s too cliched a phrase to be terribly compelling.

2.Â Memorable?Â 5

I think the meaning is clear, so hopefully the title is at least somewhat memorable.

3.Â Evocative?Â 1

Again, cliched phrases do not work well for this aspect.Â There are too many associations for the phrase already.

4.Â Tone?Â 10

5.Â Keeps its promise?Â N/A

Doesn’t really promise anything with the title.

6.Â Story Kernel?Â 7

It’s definitely centered around the story kernel but I’m not sure how clear that association is.

7.Â Clear meaning?Â 8

A man comes home to find his wife killed by robbers.Â He has an hour to cross the Time Zone boundary and literally turn back time to prevent her death.

1.Â Compelling?Â 1

Way too cliched to be compelling.

2.Â Memorable? 9

3.Â Evocative?Â 1

Again, way too cliched.

4.Â Tone?Â 2

The tone doesn’t do much to convey the sense of urgency.

5.Â Keeps its promise?Â 7

6. Story Kernel?Â 10

The title is the protagonist’s driving motivation.

7. Clear meaning?Â 10