NEW DELHI: Posing a fresh challenge to

, a writ in the

has questioned the constitutional validity of the

to make its linkage with bank accounts mandatory, adding strength to pending pleas challenging the unique identification on the grounds of violation of privacy.

The writ comes a day after RBI stated that linking of bank accounts with Aadhaar has been made mandatory under the provisions of the Prevention of

Act.

“The government has issued a gazette notification GSR 538(E) dated 1 June 2017 regarding Prevention of Money Laundering (Maintenance of Records) Second Amendment Rules, 2017, inter alia, making furnishing of Aadhaar (for those individuals who are eligible to be enrolled for Aadhaar) and permanent number (PAN) mandatory for opening a bank account,” the central bank said.

The new petition by

, who describes herself as a feminist scholar and activist working for 25 years on issues relating to women’s rights, also challenged the validity of the March 23 circular issued by the department of telecommunication making it mandatory for citizens to link their

. She said both decisions violated an individual’s right to privacy and, hence, are unconstitutional.

A nine-judge Constitution bench of the

that the “right to privacy is an integral part of right to life and personal liberty guaranteed in Article 21 of the Constitution”. The question whether right to privacy is a fundamental right and if it can be invoked to challenge Aadhaar was decided by the nine-judge bench, which left the adjudication of the validity of Aadhaar to a five-judge bench.

Sen’s petition, filed through advocate

, said the government’s decision to link Aadhaar with bank accounts by amending rules under PMLA violate the solemn promise given by the authorities that parting of biometrics by individuals was on a voluntary basis.

By making it mandatory through PMLA rules, the government was coercing those who have not given their biometrics to part with it by providing for stringent punishment. “Present and potential bank account holders who do not wish to part with their biometric information are, therefore, treated on a par with alleged offenders under PMLA,” she said.

She said the Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Act, 2016 had expressly limited the purposes for which Aadhaar number was required to be quoted. It was to be mentioned while receiving a subsidy, benefit or service which was given from the money drawn from the Consolidated Fund of India. “Services which are provided by public and private sector banks and operating of bank accounts do not fall under any subsidy, benefit or service,” she added.

Terming the mandatory linkage of bank accounts with Aadhaar as an arbitrary amendment to the KYC requirement, the petitioner said, “Building a database dependent on Aadhaar and information linked there constitutes an unreasonable risk for financial autonomy and privacy of account holders, banks and financial sovereignty of the nation.”

The petitioner said: “A citizen’s right to privacy is a fundamental right that is constitutionally protected. The right to privacy in the context of these two circulars (linking Aadhaar with bank accounts and mobile phones) has violated a citizen’s complete right over ownership and control of his core biometric information to the exclusion of all others, including the State.”

It also violates “the citizen’s right to self-determination with respect to core biometric information without fear of penal consequences, which extends even after a person has (voluntarily or otherwise) parted with his or her core biometric information”. The petition is likely to be heard next week by the Supreme Court.