

Create a poll

Is the notion female superiority being imprinted on the younger generation? Question: These days, it seems that the idea of female superiority is being encouraged and imprinted on the minds of children as they grow up. Do you think the next generation is being inundated with images encouraging the belief that women are superior? Please comment.

Created by: truthseeker at 07:06:08 PM, Saturday, May 08, 2004 PDT

Comments I checked out the Copulins website. Wow! That could explain a lot of things. I think the reason this information is being covered up is pretty obvious. It will completely destroy the myth of male power.



SarahMay 10 2004 1:18pm I think its true, we got all these little charlies angels girls running around Hi-ya! but women are stressing the point so much on this site its getting old, I mean the next poll will be called "Was God drunk when he created men?" and he probably wasn't but we are now.



Joe May 17 2004 7:52pm Was God drunk? Silly! We all know she doesn't drink!



Anonymous May 17 2004 9:00pm She should when she looks at the world today.



Anonymous May 19 2004 12:15am This is not harmful, because it is the truth.



Anonymous May 24 2004 10:03pm Female Superiority isn't a notion nor a believe, it's the truth.



Anonymous May 25 2004 9:51am Female superiority is not an 'idea', it is the way things are.



buffgirl May 26 2004 5:39am Women are superior...God made Adam and then made Eve for his helpmate...God is also referred to as man's helpmate...helpmate meaning someone to guide him in the right direction.



believer May 28 2004 3:19am The notion female superiority is being imprinted on everyone, not just the younger generation.



Anonymous May 31 2004 9:47pm Men will be living under the full authority of women for a long long time to come.



JMT Jun 05 2004 11:14am I have been in college administration for more than 30 years. As a woman I have seen enormous changes. Young women no run most campus organizations and male students routinely defer to their judgment. I recently oversaw a concert that was put on at the student union. The women ran the show and when one young man failed to complete his assigned task the leader of the group gave him a tongue lashing he won't soon forget. When she finished, he apologized and the meeting continued. That, in a nutshell, is the future.



Diane Jun 08 2004 7:33am Television Commercials often show a clever wife and a bumbling husband. Watch, you'll see.



Tammi Jun 08 2004 7:58am I am a White Man!



White Man Jun 08 2004 11:51am The clever wife will lead the way. The celver wife will love her bumbling husband. The clever will run the house. The bumbling husband had better get used to it.



JMT Jun 09 2004 5:23pm My wife forces me to recognize her as the dominant and smart one. I guess she really is right. Women are smarter than men



husband Jun 09 2004 6:22pm The women at work are aware of the fact they are faster thinkers, they've been discussing this for some time. It is pretty obvious they can accomplish more, and have fun doing it. They rub it in a lot, too.



Bill Jun 13 2004 10:04am The media has a lot to do with the fact women are presented as superior. Charlie's Angels, La Femme Nikita, Dark Angel, Xena, She Spies, and even mainstream shows constantly show women as vastly superior. This is part of a plan. Women have been dominating the entertainment industry more each year. They are the new wage earners and will have a growing influence on the images people see every day. Those images shape the way people think. The way people think will shape society.



Mark Jun 24 2004 10:11pm This is part of a plan. Ha ha ha, Mark. There is no "upper management plan"...it's just an industry giving society what it wants. If society didn't like seeing women in dominant roles, then the film industry wouldn't make such shows and movies. The mighty dollar rules.



HH Jun 30 2004 8:58am And women will control that mighty dillar.



Dave Jul 01 2004 12:21am Not only that, but they will control the economy also. The marketplace already recognizes women as the most important demographic to cater to. This is how it begins.



Anonymous Jul 08 2004 8:59pm Girl power!



Anonymous Jul 24 2004 12:03pm I want to make a comment to the woman who claimed to be an administrator for thirty years. You talk about that young woman who was in charge of a concert and how she deliberately abused a male because she was so drunk with power. It is just a shining example of how women can blast men for such bad chauvinistic and abusive behavior and then praise and justify it in themselves. He should have sued the broad for obvious harrassment based soley on his being male.



Randy Aug 01 2004 5:21am Until more than a few senators are female, will women really run this country.



Gabriel Aug 03 2004 7:58pm In due time. Women are conquering the political system faster than people realize.



Brenda Aug 14 2004 10:03pm The younger generation is growing up surrounded by images of female superiority. In the media and popular culture women are portrayed as strong, intelligent, practical, independent, etc. but men are stupid bunglers or predatory criminals. A recent book by Catherine Young, Misandry, documents this. In movies and advertising men are replaced by hairless, pouting metrosexuals. Add to that the school experience where girls get better marks, participate more, take on leadership roles, and learn self-confidence, young people can't help learning to look down on males.



Anonymous Aug 27 2004 9:50am Have you noticed most news anchors are women these days? The fact we get our information from women has a psycological effect also. It reinforces their image of superior intelligence.



Paul Sep 06 2004 8:46am also here in the uk,most of the new sports reporters are female.My dad hates it,but i love it,also agree about the huge number of female anchers,imagine what it will be like in another decade or two.Seems also to be a large number of female producers and directors,check out the credits(sad i know,but i have noticed it a lot recently)



frank Sep 06 2004 5:15pm go screw yourself you are total idiots, and i think you know it. of course you do!



j. hamburg Sep 07 2004 8:00pm Hostility is a strange reaction to the truth.



Anonymous Sep 08 2004 8:26am wow chill out j.Hamburg.Why get angry when here in the uk,it is true that women seem to becoming the face of tv.Maybe it is only because the powers that be,think its better to get your news from a pretty face.But i believe they are just making massive inroads into all forms of jobs,and the results are slowly beginning to show.I mean go back 10-15 years and see the difference on the tv then.There was few if any female sports reporters.



will Sep 08 2004 11:20am las mujeres siguen siendo tan tontas y estupidas como siempre , solo que la indusria del entretenimiento las ha puesto en un alto pedestal , aqi asistimos al entronamiento de la mujer prostituta , triunfo en la sociedad actual la prostitucion observe madona , brittney speers , thalia, etc. y todo el enjambre de prostitutas en el mundo holiwoodense es dominado por la decadencia moral y espiritual de un a sociedad que exporta pautas de comportamiento errado pero que vende al resto del mundo como bueno y deseable pobres , lo malo es que muchos se lo creen ,hoy para vender en los espectaculos hay que desnudarce y ceder a la lascivia y a la bajesa sexual ,solo se que alguien esta detras de todo esto es una mente maestra que tiene mucha experiencia con el pecado y experto en perder y extraviar a la gente y por consecuencia a la sociedad .en el principio el uso a la mujer y ella cayo yarrastro al varon mas noble y fuerte que ella al final del tiempo la historia se repite el varron cedera nuevamente o esta ves solo ella se perdera.



el profeta Sep 23 2004 4:52pm IF U CN RD THS U ND TO GET A LYF



Anonymous Oct 02 2004 5:24pm No way. Females are not superior , this kind of bigoted thinking belongs in Nazi germany (only they believed they were superior to jews, think about it, theres little difference). Males are not superior either, I find it deeply saddening that I see so many males being destroyed mentally by all this female superiority propoganda, of course you are going to underperform if you believe that you are inferior. I for one am a male, and I can tell you, I am doing extremely well at college, if a woman comes up to me saying I am mentally inferior, I will show her my results and see her pathetic face distort as she sees the truth. I cant believe people are actually believing this nonsense! More fool you! Females have their qualities, males have their qualities, its just that in this day and age, being male is deemed as wrong. Males are being attacked in the media, unfair stereotypes are being shown, all a mans life he is told that he is inferior, that he is somehow some pathetic lowlife violent thung, a 'potential rapist' , dirt of a bottom of a womans shoe. Note to men : Do not believe this superiority lark, it took Winston Churchill to stop Hitlers rants of superiority, I am wondering what will rectify this new wave of bigotry that we see.



Fenrir_0025@hotmail.com Oct 06 2004 2:49pm It's great! Females are passing males up in schools, with better grades and higher test scores. Females are proving to be better managers in the business world, where the majority of new businesses are female-owned. We are far superior, and we have plenty so show for it.



Sandy Nov 10 2004 11:24pm I think it's great too. Society has finally reached the point where we can fully utilize the entire population to it's fullest potential. There was a time when there was a need, real or perceived, to have large families and since you don't get much milk from a mans nipples, women stayed home. But 100 years ago being a housewife was a full time job. With modern conveniences it no longer is and now women can have careers if they choose to and that is to everyones advantage. IT's not a superiority lark that females far surpass males in school and now business. They're more intelligent. Evidently, much more intelligent and they know it. Not universally but on average, it is indisputable. The more women in power positions the better of we will all be.



Anonymous Nov 13 2004 2:55am So true. Another factor is the advancement of technology, which is rapidly eliminating the demand for masculine characteristics in the workplace and the business world. Women are better qualified for the jobs of today than men, and the gap is increasing as women become better educated.



Tina Nov 13 2004 9:07pm Anonyomous and Tina have touched on social facts that shape young people's experience today. Boys and girls grow up today without the prejudices of the past about "women's work" or "a woman's place," in fact what they see around them is examples of women living up to their potential, and in many cases working easily alongside men or doing better than them. I don't know if they would conclude that women are superior but they certainly aren't learning that women are inferior.



Anonymous Nov 19 2004 4:56pm Since girls are so much better in school and they are influenced by the young women outperforming men in business, it is hard to believe they wouldn't conclude that they are superior.



Anonymous Nov 20 2004 6:54am Regarding Fenrir_0025@hotmail.com's comment on female superiority: > > > > > > > > I am male and grew up believing the same thing. I would hear comments that women matured earlier or were somehow better but dismissed them. And I understand the comment about his grades being better. I too have come across women (and men) who need help learning and understanding things. The world is full of people of varying levels of knowledge and aptitude. If we are to make a case for gender superiority, we have to understand we are speaking in general terms. There will always been exceptions just as there are geniuses and idiots of both genders. So we are examining the majority of women versus the majority of men. Secondly, we have to dismiss the notion that since we are of the same species, we MUST be equal but different. This is an ideal and frankly one I wish was true. However, the evidence clearly shows, women are not only different, but truly better in many ways. Just because this isn't what I would like, I can't deny the truth: Women ARE doing better in most levels of education all over the world. Studies show women have better senses, especially taste and smell. And they do better in facial recognition tests. Studies show women have more stamina and better endurance. In many cases, they handle colds better than men. Ever notice men with a cold get knocked down harder while women keep going? Many teachers find women are better learners. This due in part to not being afraid to ask questions and appear dumb. Women's brains are wired differently and have better connections to both hemispheres. Women are biologically superior (including the double X advantage). Women have better language and communication skills and are better at multitasking. Studies also find that women have better memories. They make better investors. And I could go on but I'm not writing a book. On the other side of the coin, men are more susceptible to certain diseases. They have more emotional and developmental problems. Men are filling the prisons while women are filling the universities. Some call this a jack-off site since the idea of women being superior gets some men hard. They know women are taking over and the roles are being adjusted (or corrected, depending on your point of view). This is relevant, but beside the point. No one really knows how society will change over time but I think its a safe bet to put your money on women making major contributions and leading us into a better world. As our superiors they will guide and train us men to become better people. You see, women also eat healthier, take better care of themselves and others. They even donate more to charities. All in all I really admire and respect women. And yes, I reluctantly have to admit my inferiority since this is the reality of female superiority. But this doesn't mean men should give up and not get educated. Men need to strive to overcome our weaknesses and become better persons. Be the best we can be. This is what most women want too. Societal changes are happening VERY rapidly. I see more and more where its the woman who rules in the relationship. And with good reason, since female superiority isn't a dream or a belief. It's a fact and its true.



STTG Jan 05 2005 10:38pm What a load of sad, self-deluding losers! There is really nothing more to say to your imbecilic nonsense.



Billy Feb 11 2005 6:17pm damn right billy boy,f*ck help us if a war ever started,with all the poofs on this site we would lose easily.



jj Feb 21 2005 1:42pm People are beginning to realize that wars will be less andless likely the more women are in power. And don't go on about Margaret Thatcher. One or two women in a male dominated power structure tend to play the boy's game. When women reach real parity with men in the positions of power in the world things will really change for the better.



Anonymous Apr 24 2005 1:23pm I want to make a comment to the woman named Diane from above. The one who has been in college administration for thirty years. If a man had given a woman that kind of treatement, you would have poo your panties about how abusive he is. It's amazing how you women rationalize and accept in yourselves what you condemn in us. And you say that in a nutshell that is the future. Hypocrisy, thy name is woman. Women will be far more incompetent in running the world because they cannever accept accountability. The world is doomed to matriarchal tyranny, far worse than patriarchy ever could be.



Ted Apr 25 2005 6:38pm Females are passing up males in school because of this affirmative action crap. If you are so damned superior why do you continue to need it?



Ted Apr 25 2005 6:47pm I want to make a comment to the woman named Diane from above. The one who has been in college administration for thirty years. If a man had given a woman that kind of treatement, you would have poo your panties about how abusive he is. It's amazing how you women rationalize and accept in yourselves what you condemn in us. And you say that in a nutshell that is the future. Hypocrisy, thy name is woman. Women will be far more incompetent in running the world because they cannever accept accountability. The world is doomed to matriarchal tyranny, far worse than patriarchy ever could be.



Ted Apr 25 2005 6:48pm I want to make a comment to the woman named Diane from above. The one who has been in college administration for thirty years. If a man had given a woman that kind of treatement, you would have poo your panties about how abusive he is. It's amazing how you women rationalize and accept in yourselves what you condemn in us. And you say that in a nutshell that is the future. Hypocrisy, thy name is woman. Women will be far more incompetent in running the world because they cannever accept accountability. The world is doomed to matriarchal tyranny, far worse than patriarchy ever could be.



Ted Apr 25 2005 6:48pm I want to make a comment to the woman named Diane from above. The one who has been in college administration for thirty years. If a man had given a woman that kind of treatement, you would have poo your panties about how abusive he is. It's amazing how you women rationalize and accept in yourselves what you condemn in us. And you say that in a nutshell that is the future. Hypocrisy, thy name is woman. Women will be far more incompetent in running the world because they cannever accept accountability. The world is doomed to matriarchal tyranny, far worse than patriarchy ever could be.



Ted Apr 25 2005 6:48pm I want to make a comment to the woman named Diane from above. The one who has been in college administration for thirty years. If a man had given a woman that kind of treatement, you would have poo your panties about how abusive he is. It's amazing how you women rationalize and accept in yourselves what you condemn in us. And you say that in a nutshell that is the future. Hypocrisy, thy name is woman. Women will be far more incompetent in running the world because they cannever accept accountability. The world is doomed to matriarchal tyranny, far worse than patriarchy ever could be.



Ted Apr 25 2005 6:48pm All Diane did was verbally reprimand (gave a tounge lashing to) an incompetent subordinate who happened to be male. If anything, it only demonstrates that she is assertive and in control, and deserves to be in an authorative position. If he failed to complete his assigned task, he got what he deserved, and she should be commended for doimg what needs to be done. It is not an example of matriarchal tyranny, it is an example of confidence and leadership ability in a strong woman. If a man can't handle answering to a woman in a position of authority, he is the one with the problem.



Beth May 10 2005 4:51pm He has a big problem because it's impossible to go through life without answering to a woman unless perhaps you're in construction. But even in that career it is unlikely because when renovating a house the wife invariably becomes the primary client. Not because she has authority over her husband but because women care much more about their homes than their husbands do. If Ted is a white collar worker, he's done for because more and more men have to defer to women in the office world.



a guy May 21 2005 5:47am Female superiority is probably not being advanced in kids today however I have heard boys rationalize why they are so far behind girls academically by saying "Girls are smart.". Reciprocally it's not uncommon to hear girls say that boys are stupid. I don't remember feeling that way when I was a child. Perhaps it's just a lack of maturity or a lack of sophistication that makes kids say such things. Women do seem to be more intelligent in most areas but that doesn't necessarily mean that a blanket statement like "men are stupid" is accurate.



Anonymous May 29 2005 7:44am Anon, superiority is a comparative term. Younger people these days see a lot of evidence of female superiority in the academic world and in small business where women are starting twice as many businesses as men and completely dominating fields that were once almost exclusively male, such as real estate and middle management. Also there is a continual stream of scientific data affirming the natural superiority of the female sex on a genetic and physiological level. The taboos about women being strong have been lifted and females are asserting themselves like never before. Men are, in many ways, not as smart as women even though there are a lot of highly intelligent men. On average women have greater IQs than men. If you take a random sample and exclude 1 percent of the most intelligent people of both sexes, women are significantly smarter than men. There may be a few more males in the top 1%, but they are, in a sense, freaks and not the norm at all.



womnpwr Jun 01 2005 11:22am The facts that women posess superior multi-tasking and intellectual abilities are strong evidence to support the idea that women are mentally superior. Superior intellect is all women need to call the shots.



Beth Jun 19 2005 12:14am Finally, society is returning to Matriuarchy, I readily take my place beneath the Authority and Rule of Womyn. I submit to her strength over me and I obey her wisdom as she leads me into wisdom. Women are the natural leaders of men and, now men are finally seeing the truth of womans'primacy. Women are the born leaders and a man is to follow under, be quiet and demure, submissively bowing to her superior power, strength and wisdom.



dennis Jul 06 2005 12:44pm You only have to look at young women today and how they act,they have a certain aragance about them now,i reckon they realise they can do what they want,and do it better then men.Guys like randy will never change,but the younger ones will have grown up,besides these girls and will be used to seeing women beating men at most things,so it will not be seen as someting strange or weird,like some guys seem to today.What i love is how men still deny it,yet everywhere you look women,are working away hard,and overtaking men.In the uk they dominate medical,law,vets, schools as well as education,also middle management is pretty much female dominated,and they start up more new companys then men.Also this week it has been reported women in the uk,are richer then men from the ages of 18-44yrs old,and by 2025 will have the bulk of the money.Better just get used to it guys,you can fight it,but most men it seems are not,or just aint up to it.



chris Jul 27 2005 4:32pm It is estimated at the rate that male college enrollment is declining that in about a dozen years the student population will be exclusively female. If women are the only ones with access to higher education, it is only logical that they will be in control of things economically. She who holds the pursestrings has the power to call the shots across the board, money and power go hand in hand.



Darcy Aug 23 2005 10:36pm Its funny is it not though,that men who try to deny that women are taking over,say things nowdays like education is not so important,and the exams are to easy,aslo as to why there are no male teachers,its because its to lowly paid. Yet when males dominated education,it was a good job,and to get a education was highly thought of.Makes me laugh at how they twist it to suit themselves. Still bet they will not be laughing so hard,when they find there bosses are nearly all female,and they cannot rise higher in there jobs,because they dont have the right exam results,and degree. I am at the moment sitting a adult education class,as well as having a fairly good job.What is amazing is the course i am on,has a female teacher,and 20 out of 25 female students.The lady in charge of getting people in to the course,told me they have tried everything they can think of,to get more male students,but they just will not appear.She reckons they are now running scared,she straight up tode me this,and what the hell could i say back,the statistics worldwide bar a few countrys,totaly back this up. Gonna be a scary strange world,for the largly uneducated,men with nothing to do,and poorly payed jobs.



chris Aug 26 2005 6:14pm Yes it is, because it's true.



a guy Aug 30 2005 10:44am The concept of female superiority has taken hold on people of all ages. It really is not a debate anymore, those who resist it are an obscure and irrelevant minority.



Tom Oct 02 2005 12:00pm Well said Tom.



STTG Oct 21 2005 3:28pm If there are changes too far in the fem supreme direction, it's a superficial fad. But it will be self-correcting. Most guys who buy into it lose the respect of women and aren't even desirable to them. They may not tell you that, but they won't tell you they're using you and banging the guy they like on the side. Women get away with what men let them get away with.



SC Nov 21 2005 8:29am Yes and rightfully so.



HERboy Jan 28 2006 5:42pm Women stronger than men seems exciting now because it is still new. When the newness fades, men are going to become very weary of stronger women, and women will feel unsatisfied by weak wimpy men.



Anonymous 101 Apr 03 2006 10:41pm It's not really new. As stated elsewhere, men have been excited by the idea of women being stronger since the amazon legends.



Anonymous Apr 06 2006 7:26am Since women are so superior, let THEM fight the wars while us weak and stupid men stay home and enjoy life without women. Contrary to popular belief, us men can be very happy without sex. Being away from women helps us males to focus our minds and find true meaning. And save lots of money.



Kung Fu Master Apr 15 2006 10:04pm Yes, the notion female superiority being imprinted on the younger generation. And it looks like the girls are enjoying it.



Anonymous Apr 19 2006 11:39pm Since males seem to want to spend their educational life after puberty having fun and not applying themselves to study why not ban all males from higher education.Males need to be educated just enough for the menial and hard physically tasks.The resources should be directed to female education as being superior intelectually and having a greater ability to concentrate and study they will fill the command roles in employment.No male should be in charge of a female in the work place or the home unless she be a child.Males should be excluded by law from the teaching proffession if they don't exclude themselves by dint of their own lack of effort or qualifications.In any firm no male should earn more than the lowest paid female.



Big Brenda Apr 28 2006 6:51pm Women should be wearing miniskirts as often as possible: At work, school, shopping, public events, etc. And get rid of those irritating SLEEVES! Women should be showing arms, shoulders and back. This business of women wearing sleeves and long pants that cover knees is GARBAGE !!



He Man May 01 2006 10:19pm Female superiority is not merely a notion being imprinted in the minds of the young, it is an undeniable fact. As a girl I don't merely think myself to be superior to boys I rejoice in the knowledge that I am superior. Nearly all the pupils in the top groups at my school are girls, the reverse being true for the remedial classes which are bulging at the seems with underachieving pointless examples of male failure who's only purpose in life seems to be to try and gratify their primal sexual urges. We don't need to sell a notion of female superiority to either sex, both girls and boys instictively know it to be true. GIRLS RULE!!!!



A GIRL May 21 2006 11:52pm As a male I also rejoice in the knowledge that the female is superior. Unfortunantly it has taken far too long for this truth to emerge from years of suppresion, but finally and joyfully it is acknowleged fact. It's amazing how the fight for equality has turned into the fact of female superiority.



Anonymous May 22 2006 11:16pm A whole generation of boys and Girls are growing up witnessing first hand the superior achievements of Females. The best and brightest minds of the future will be Female. It is reality that is leving its imprint.



womnpwr May 23 2006 10:11am A woman's place is in the home.



Old Fashioned May 24 2006 11:03pm A man's place is in the home.



New Fashioned May 27 2006 6:17pm A Girl is entirely right Women are superior and there is not a "notion" but a demonstable fact that they are superior.Praise to the Goddess that Women are finally going to rule society and guide us to the peacefull prosperous future that rule will entail.



Anonymous May 28 2006 6:31am The superioity of women is so taken for granted now, that all the discussion is of how to possibly reverse the decline of males. It's not that males have declined, it's just that the natural superiority of females which had been suppressed for so long is now being allowed to flourish. The greatest advancement in human history is the recognition of the superiority of the female.



AG May 28 2006 7:54am Sorry New Fashioned but you are wrong. A mans place is licking the feet of his superior.... WOMAN!!!



A GIRL May 30 2006 1:32am A man's place is in the home. Taking care of the children and the home while the head of the household, the superior female goes out to work.



Anonymous May 30 2006 12:32pm I disagree. A man's place is where ever he wants it to be as long as he earns it. It's not a universal truth that women are smarter than men any more than it is a universal truth that men are larger than women. It's just that most women are more intelligent than most men. This leaves room for guys to succeed or at least work.



male May 31 2006 11:09am "most women are more intelligent than most men." It's really astonishing how widely accepted this truth has become. What was once unthinkable has become accepted truth. Amazing!



Anonymous May 31 2006 3:18pm a girl a mans place is in the home licking a Womans feet, bottom,anus, vagina,clitoris or anything else of hers he is ordered to lick.



Lou Rolls Jun 01 2006 5:45am www.likelike.com/poll.php?poll_id=2550



Anonymous Jun 07 2006 12:52pm female-led-relationships.com/forum/index.php



Anonymous Jul 16 2006 6:48pm And why not! The way of the future is Female supremacy and a total reversal of roles and power between the sexes..... get used to that lacy apron males as you dutifully submit and obey your Female Masters without a word of backtalk.



Omphale Aug 16 2006 10:39am It seems that the media propaganda against men never stops. Today I saw a TV program which empatically said that ALL of the world's problems are caused by men, and women would be much happier in a world with NO MEN. If somebody made a TV program claiming that the world would be better if there were no negros or no Muslims or no Chinese or no women, there would be outrage directed against that TV station. Yet men are targeted by the media every day, and nobody protests.



2006/08/19 Aug 19 2006 10:22pm My wife excepts this as fact and always says that women are superior in every way and is very competitive. I had made mention that women are weaker, now that we have a home gym I shoked at her physical strength. Her endurance is killing me and the result is that she will out work me in our gym. She has gained strength so fast as to become stronger in the legs and match my upper body strength in a fairly short time. She has been comparing her strength to mine all along and is now showing me how she has gained strength much faster as well as adding muscle to her frame. I could tell for sure but she showed me comparing our recorded log books (that was her idea) and is now stating that this is what is happening "women are becoming the stronger sex all around and superior physical strength is in our future too" "I am becoming stronger than you and there is nothing that will change that outcome" now when I workout with my wife, she sets the pace and is already stronger in her legs but is now proving to pull ahead of me in upper body strength. At first it was as all along her ability to do more reps and sets and now to keep up with the same weight, I can't match her sets unless I remove weight. This has started about four months ago. She now says that this is just the beganing and that she is only going to get stronger.



Anonymous Aug 20 2006 1:42pm Yes woman are outperforming man academically, socially, biologically and even PHYSICALLY. More and more proof is coming to light that they are stronger too. They are closing the strength gap quite fast. Many of you men are finding that out as you are out muscled by your wife, sister, or female friend. As the rest of the male rule falls to women so we see physical strength increasing in women until men are finding the shocking truth of ... she's now even stronger he.



Carly Aug 20 2006 1:56pm As women gain more and more control over society, they will discover the many uses of "feminization." The highly feminized role, terms of dress, posture, behavior and voicing was designed by men over the centuries to enforce submissiveness among women. The point is that there is NOTHING that this role that is necesarily "female". Look at the successful female leaders and athletes and you will see no trace of the "sissy" type image. It is simply a tool that has been used to enforce social control and it can just as easily be applied to men as women. In the greatest gender reversal since the ancient overthrow of the "Mother Goddess," women will begin to take hold of feminization as a means of maintaining control over males. This was foreshadowed in the Victorian era when women (mothers and governesses) would discipline adolescent boys by making them dress in feminine attire and adopt feminine behaviors as a form of punishment. This was known as "petticoat discipline." Today, men are being feminized in a thousand different ways. In the future, feminization will be used as a form of social control and what we now think of as especially female attributes will be enforced for males. Mens' shoes will become more ornate, less comfortable and ultimately be so unstable and hard to remove that any woman will be able to outrun any man on any street anytime. Men's fashions will feature fabrics and designs that are more delicate, more constricting, harder to put on and take off and more focussed on fashion than function. Even male voices will change. I can see the day when it is considered the height of rudeness for a male to use the chest register when speaking. Men will be expected to speak in a whisper-- or not at all. As this happens, males will as a whole will lose mental and physical strength. Indeed that was the whole point of the highly feminine image in the first place. For centuries it helped keep "women in their place." The greatest irony is that males will ultimately have these techniques used against them--- every day, for centuries to come.



Anonymous Aug 30 2006 7:08am Look men are strong and being strong is all that really matters. No woman can really beat up any man in the real world. If some men want to play around and pretend like women are all powerful and everything that's fine by me but its all fake and doesn't change the facts of life. Men run the show always have always will.



A Real Man Aug 31 2006 8:22am Actually, being intelligent counts for quite a bit as well. Napolean, Al Capone, these guys weren't exactly physically intimidating, they gained power through brain not brawn. Beyond that I agree. Some of these fantasies are just that.



Anonymous Aug 31 2006 1:09pm Intelligence is a combination of nature and nurture. Clearly, men and women each have their own distinctive talents and traits. The question is which talents and traits society chooses to value and reward most abundantly. In the past, male traits were exalted and female traits were defined in the narrowest possible scope. (Home, family, marriage etc.) In the future, female traits will rise in importance and common male behaviors will be defined as deviant or even criminal.



Anonymous Sep 01 2006 6:31am Male behavior is already being defined as criminal. Merely LOOKING at a woman the wrong way is now enough to get a man labeled as a rapist or fired from his job -- even though he never touched a woman and never even attempted to touch them.



Anonymous Male Victim Sep 01 2006 1:31pm I used to resent some of the sexual harrassment attitudes but I have come into line with what women demand. They still want us to hit on them, it's just that we have to do so more respectfully. And they're right to feel that way. They're always right about everything.



Anonymous Sep 02 2006 4:29pm The results of "scientific" studies are determined politically more often than people realize. If a "scientific" study concluded that women were somehow inferior to men, would those results be publicized in the pro-Feminist, male-bashing news media? No way!! That would be politically incorrect. Only "scientific" studies that conclude female superiority are good enough to be publicized in the pro-Feminist, male-bashing news media. Furthermore, any researcher who discovered any kind of female inferiority would probably be defunded and slandered. Only researchers who conclude female superiority get additional funding, so they can publish more male-bashing "research."



Angry Man Sep 06 2006 5:54pm Anonymous, just because you are whipped, don't class us all in with you. Women are not always right, in fact they are wrong a lot of the time. They just hide their wrongs up with "make up" much like they do their faces because they can't accept the fact that they aren't as attractive without it. Men rule this world, and the only place women will rule is on this place. Like Like



Future King of America Sep 09 2006 6:11pm Many places in the USA have low or very low educational standards. Therefore, outperforming the average is easy, so females who outperform males have little to boast about. I fear that the low academic performance of boys is merely a symptom of a deeper psychological problem: It seems that American males are more depressed, discouraged, aimless and unmotivated than ever before. What is causing this mental fog, and how to escape it?



Samurai Psychiatrist Sep 10 2006 7:32pm Anonymous on the feminisation of males.Brilliant i think you have really hit on something.Of course males will not be allowed to shout at Womyn except maybe to warn them about a fastly advancing male drawn rickshaw etc.males will nee a vast array of laws and conventions tailored for them in order for Womyn to feel safe and comfortable around the violent sex. However the point about Governesses employing petticoat discipline highlights the extremely patriarchal society of Victorian times.Why should it be humiliating to don the superior sexes clothing? Please please write again.



Lou Rolls Sep 12 2006 4:04pm By "feminization" I refer to the patriarchal attitude that women are the "weaker sex." This idea, is increasingly belied by the facts but the history remains. The HYPER-feminine role was desigend to reinforce submissiveness. That is the role to which I am referring. Active successful women of the feminine kind have already rejected the HYPER feminine role-- recognizing that it is a tool of the dominance.



Anonymous Sep 13 2006 7:46pm New Poll: THE WAR AGAINST BOYS www.likelike.com/poll.php?poll_id=2603



Anonymous Sep 19 2006 6:05pm Has anyone here read THE WAR AGAINST BOYS, by Christina Hoff Sommers? I just finished reading it, and it is excellent.



Anonymous Sep 28 2006 11:53am No I haven't and I never will.



Anonymous Oct 14 2006 6:21pm What is the earliest age at which athletically active girls can have beautiful muscular legs that men like: (1) Age 18 (2) Age 21 (3) Age 25 (4) Age 30.



MiniPoll Oct 29 2006 6:11pm The concept of female superiority is indeed being imprinted on the minds of the young, and it is having a profound effect. It is re-shaping society a little at a time.



Bob Jan 28 2007 1:02pm I think the percentage of males who accept female superiority has risen sharply over the last decade. Probably most men now really believe that wome are superior. Only a small percentage of girls would not laugh out loud at the suggestion that males are superior.



wmnpwr Jan 29 2007 2:32pm Sat. 2/3/07



Date Update Feb 03 2007 9:57pm #110



# Feb 06 2007 10:34pm The assertion of female superiority has been so successful in schools that few boys would now question that girls are more imtelligent and able than they are. The strange thing about this phenominum is that both girls AND boys are so comfortable with this shift in gender power that female SUPREMACY can be but a few step further on!



A male who knows his place Mar 01 2007 1:42pm Males are actually the weaker sex, biologically speaking. Do a google search on xy chromosome, you will see.



dawn Mar 04 2007 12:51pm Dawn is a female chauvenist pig, and I don't believe that superiority, one way or the other can be established by Googling. What a moron!



Randy Mar 14 2007 8:57pm Dawn is correct men are weaker than the women.



ben Mar 31 2007 4:08pm In the last thirty years or so, since girls have been encouraged to do well in education and think of their careers they have caught up with and now gone way beyond boys exam results. Boys are currently only achieving grades that girls were making seven years ago, and the gap is growing, despite government initiatives to help boys catch up. The end result, women will have all the highest qualifications, take all the best jobs and ultimately, organise and run the world. So i guess the notion 'females are superior' is being imprinted on our children, because it's true.



Nicola Apr 03 2007 11:22am #0117 (Tue.) 4/10/07



Update Apr 09 2007 11:04pm Irrelevant of the content I would expect there to be much more debate.How logistically do you think males will die out ?. With a gradual decline or with a rapid change. I think a few intelligent men of which there are many will have something to say.



Fred Aug 14 2007 3:34am If there was a web site with 50 polls about white people being superior to blacks, that web site would be quickly shut down. I want to see all of www.likelike.com permanently shut down and removed from the internet. If that is not possible, then I would like to see all polls on this web site erased and all new polls.



Anonymous Oct 21 2007 3:05pm If there was a web site with 50 polls about white people being superior to blacks, that web site would be quickly shut down. I want to see all of www.likelike.com permanently shut down and removed from the internet. If that is not possible, then I would like to see all polls on this web site erased and all new polls.



Anonymous Oct 21 2007 3:06pm I had to review a training video this morning at the direction of my Female boss and the video used She and Her as the third person pronouns. In fifty years we have gone from us of the male pronoun to describe a person of unspecified gender, to the 1970's "he or she" and "him or her" to She and Her. I think that does indicate a generational shift and it will accelerate.



obedient husband Nov 28 2007 6:32pm Nicola is right. For years now, girls and women have been gaining educationally on boys and men. Today, they are pulling away. How can we males not be affected by this. We are seeing daily that we can't keep up academically with them. We now have to look to other ways to find our self esteem and place in the world. In the end, that probably means simply being there to help women as they advance. Certainly, i can see many more househusbands in the future and other jobs that require less education.



thomas Jan 21 2008 9:09pm As interesting and exciting as the femdom/submale thing is, it makes me vomit in my mouth a little to read most of these comments and 'studies'. Women perform better in school because they're good at shutting up and being told what to do, which is how our education system now works. Men who dare to think for themselves, who are independent, who don't fit into a mold, are told they're 'bad' or given amphetamines until they fall in. I'm sure every woman on here will respond with some 'brainwashed' or 'misogynist' argument, but I'm far from your masucline, beer-chugging, All-American Male. My girlfriend is more masculine than I am, my psychiatrist approve me for sex-reassignment if I want to do it, and I was brought up by a single mother. I have ever personal reason to wish female-domination was the norm, because then I wouldn't feel so out of place because of my passive-submissive nature. 'Facts' and responses like these though make me realize that women are no better than men.



Dana Jan 31 2008 7:45pm Nicola, girls are taking over not by achievement or padded test scores that favor females, but because of reverse descrimination, or as other nazis like you would like to call it, affirmative action. A process handed to people who just can't cut it



your mamma Feb 01 2008 3:32pm Its sad that we men have fallen to the point that we have to blame others or hidden agendas for why girls are out performing us. Either we have to step to the plate and do better or admit that they are better than us.



thomas Feb 27 2008 11:30am The daughters of today are going to castrate the men of tomorrow. GIVE UP YOUR BALLS, BOYS its over.



Anonymous Mar 20 2008 8:55am "The daughters of today are going to castrate the men of tomorrow. GIVE UP YOUR BALLS, BOYS its over.". Luckily I won't need them, because tomorrow I'm going to be a genetically/nanotech enhanced next generation human being. And with the body irrelevant in the battle of the sexes the competition will be a tournament of minds only. Better buff up that personality Anonymous , that's what you'll need where the future travels.



FNOL Mar 26 2008 1:45am It should read "the Hitlers of today are going to castrate the men of tomorrow". Hitler just replaces the word daughters, but they are one and the same.



NG Apr 25 2008 5:30pm Anyone who goes around with the idea that girls and women are more sensitive, thoughtful, nurturning and blah, blah, blah, needs to see the movie Odd Girl Out, and you will see that it just isn't true. Females are just as bad as males and YOU ALL KNOW IT!



sTEVE Jun 08 2008 8:35am Female Superiority does not occur because Women are somehow morally superior to males. Some are and some aren't. Rather it occurs because Women emit what for lack of better words is a Female aspect that mentally and physically subjugates males. The desire to be subsumed by a Woman's inner thighs reduces a male to slave status. For any trekkies out there, all Women are the Dolman of Elas if they get in touch with themselves and learn how to activate their control.



obedient husband Jun 08 2008 2:41pm I love star trek !. A show that promoted equal rights for all and the ideas of peace , humanity and freedom from subjugation !.



FNOL Jun 17 2008 6:58pm The feminist movement has had a strong subliminal effect on the male population. A lot of men have been influenced by the imprinting of the image of female superiority and have developed fetishes because of it.



Anonymous Jul 14 2008 8:05pm FNOL, what about Mistress Beata on Angel One? She is probably my favorite Star Trek guest character.



obedient husband Jul 26 2008 7:23pm There is no such thing as female superiority. Get off the drugs now.



Rick Oct 22 2008 5:34pm The feminist movement has far reaching effects in school. In one Jr. Hi six 8th grade girls hazed a dozen 7th grd. boys by lining them up making them remove all their clothes and sing I AM WOMAN with the change to YOU ARE WOMAN..you are invinible..etc.." Everyone thought it was hilarious. The girls got two days detention. There was an uproar for a while but as one girl said, now it's a big uproar, but a few years from now, it will be 'a tradition'. A feminists professor commented that oneday all males will be lined up naked and sing YOU ARE WOMAN with their little wee wees showing. The women will all laugh and applaud, the men will all shrink and obey. She's ivy league.



little wee wee Nov 27 2008 10:14am Oh, these Girls are really superior! Yes, that's the way we inferior stupid males must be treated in public! And in private there's nothing better to make us behave properly that a harsh whipping!



Nick N Nov 29 2008 6:51am Little Wee Wee, that never happened. And you are dillusional and I am here to ruin the fun of the inferior liberal feminazis and their panty waste breathren. Men are and always will be in charge. Sorry to disappoint all of your readers of Variations and Penthouse Letters



Paul Apr 05 2009 2:30pm Yes the notion that females are better at everything is being imprinted on the minds of the young by female teachers who form the majority in that profession.



Anonymous Apr 15 2009 1:26pm yes and it is a good thing girls should know they are superior boys should know they are inferior



Steve Jul 21 2009 4:08am #0140 - (Sat.) * 10/3/09



Update Oct 03 2009 1:26pm This is all very amusing. People like you tend to make me lose faith in the world as 90% of you have, seemingly, no ability to think in logical and complex terms. We all know there are men that may as well be women and women who may as well be men. Also, in all statistics regarding the abilities of men and women the margin is rather small maybe 5-10% which is interesting, but not terribly exciting. Given that there will always be a statistical distribution of abilities among people, male or female, there is going to be some serious overlap when it comes to cognitive and physical abilities. So in answer to the question of which gender is superior: Women might be superior in some areas %5-10 of the time. This is nothing to get too thrilled about. I suspect that most of the women commenting here feel like failures in their personal lives to some degree and need this madness to create the illusion that they are some kind of godlike figure to compensate. I suggest you all go outside, take a deep breath of fresh air and go read a book on logical fallacies. Thank you for reading.



Joe Oct 04 2009 11:22am Little Wee Wee...Even if that did happen, which I sincerely doubt, those girls should have been expelled from school and considered sex offenders just like it would have happened if the boys had done it to them. Shove this I am Woman bull poo up your ass unAmerican commie pinko.....



Gloria Steinam Oct 05 2009 3:27am Anyone who uses the word "poo" is an idiot.



Anonymous Oct 20 2009 9:27pm The future is female - there is no doubt about it. Women and girls are outperforming men and boys in all areas and by the middle of this century, if not sooner, women will hold all the positions of power and wealth and the vast majority of graduates will be female. Men will have to learn to take second place to the superior women in their lives, but they will adapt and become supportive husbands. It is unlikely that the dominant females will impose a reversal of dress or seek to feminise their menfolk as feminine attire makes a woman glamourous and women will still value the male as a sexual partner. Men will be left in their drab attire, as insignificant drones to their ambitious, dazzling queen. Women will conquer all but men will learn to adapt and survive.



Jasmine Nov 24 2009 11:48am However, if the dominant females so wish it is within their power to inflict the ultimate humiliation and to force femininity upon their men and boys and force them to adopt the skirts, high heels and make up that has formally been the province of women and to impose upon them the roles of housewife, secretary, cheerleader and maid and oh for a Star Trek anology imagine a Captain Uhura in the command chair in her command gold shirt and a lowly Lt Kirk in his mini-dress announcing "Hailing Frequencies open Captain"



Jasmine Nov 24 2009 3:29pm Mistress Beata of Angel One should have kept Riker as a personal slave and it is too bad Picard didn't lose his trial with Ardra and have to serve Her. One would think that by the twenty-fourth century Star Fleet would have discovered a number of Female dominant cultures but maybe the writers were too closed minded.



obedient husband Dec 01 2009 5:13pm I've been around for awhile and I've witnessed most of the changes that have taken place in the last 50-60 years. I've watched as females have nearly completely and soon will completely change positions in society with males. It frightened me at first, but today I welcome it as I realize that females are truely superior. One only needs to study the order of creation to realize that God created the basic things first, and that each thing he created was superior to the previous creation. Woman was the last thing created and is indeed the most superior of all of God's creation. Personally, I beleive males, when compared to females are nothing more than emotional and mental infants and should be treated as such. Males in my generation always boasted about "I wear the pants" meaning they were male and had the power. I think it's time for females to quit sharing the pants and take them away and put the males in dresses, skirts, and all the other pretty lacy underthings that will enhance a males sense of inferiority and submission. I would see no harm even if females were to decide that males are so inferior that they be put in diapers for complete and absolute control of every aspect of their life.



obedient and submissive husband Dec 22 2009 1:54pm Each thing "he" created! Goddess created Woman in Her own image, and created males so that Woman could have slaves.



obedient husband Dec 22 2009 5:57pm God created Adam and then out of his rib created Eve. As the last of God?s creations, the human female is the perfected version of the human male, and was endowed with superior intelligence, endurance, wisdom and grace. The only advantage conferred upon the human male was his superior upper body strength. Up until recently, males have used their superior physical strength as the basis of their power to build civilization and the modern world, but have abused their power by subjugating women and preventing them from using their superior intellect and wisdom for the betterment of humanity as a whole. In the late twentieth century though, males became the victims of their own successes and propensity for warfare. Increased technological advances over a very short period of time meant that women did not need to spend all their time confined to doing housework and raising children as labour saving appliances came into the home and freed women so that they could enter the workplace. Technological advance favoured women as they are better at interacting with technology than the men who created it. Technology rendered the one advantage that men had over women, their greater physical strength, redundant. As a result of the colossal world wars that were fought in the early twentieth century and which required for the first time for women to be fully mobilized into the war effort, and as a result of political agitation from women?s rights movements, women gained the vote and politicians had to obtain the female vote by passing laws to give women the same rights as men under the law and to provide equal access to education and to the workplace. The economy also changed, becoming more reliant on service industries, which required the skills such as communication, customer service skills and technology at which women excelled, rather than the old manufacturing industries where men had once thrived. Thus, by the end of the twentieth century, men had been forced to give up the political and legal advantages they had once enjoyed over women and were now forced to compete with them in the education system and in the workplace on level terms ? except that, of course, women possessed greater intellect and wisdom than men and now that all constraints upon them had been removed they began to seriously outperform males in education and in the workplace. Within the first couple of decades of the twenty-first century, in the western world women became dominant within the education system, the professions, the business world, communications and entertainment, politics and even the military, as they formed the majority of the officer class. Males, by comparison, were reduced to a disadvantaged minority in all walks of life and were becoming increasingly unemployable and confined to the home as househusbands to their more successful wives. By the middle of the twenty-first century, the gap between men and women had become a chasm and western society faced social problems as a result of high levels of male underachievement, unemployment, crime and resentment of the success of women. In response to these problems, women across the western world formed a political movement, The Matriarchy, which advocated the superiority and domination of women and inferiority and subjugation of males for the good of society. The Matriarchy gained widespread support from the majority of women and the movement gained power at the polls in most western countries. The new all-female governments and legislatures soon passed laws stripping men of the right to vote and to hold public office, to own property and businesses, to be employed in the professions and to be company directors. Men were effectively excluded from public life. Having gained complete control of the state and the economy, the new governments concentrated on the solution to the social problems posed by the mass of redundant males, which was a programme of enforced feminization of all males under the age of 16. All such males were required to report to special facilities where they were forced to dress in female clothing and accessories and make up and trained to become maids and then, once trained, sent back to their homes to serve as maids. The Matriarchy then imposed sumptuary laws upon the members of both sexes. Women were to dress in the suits traditionally worn by men, eschewed the use of cosmetics and jewellery, and the frills and lace on underclothes was removed. Males were forbidden to wear trousers and had to adopt the traditional dress of women, including skirts, dresses, frilly underwear, make up, jewellery and high heels. Women considered this a small price to pay for the advantages they now enjoyed over males. The humiliation of males was now complete as they now had to consider what pretty underwear and frock to wear each day. That most constricting and feminine of garments, the corset and petticoat was re-introduced, to be worn by males as a means of control and humiliation and all males were required to wear them from an early age. Thus adult males became as corseted and petticoated as any lady in the early twentieth century. Thereafter, the upbringing of boys was to mirror that traditionally given to girls i.e as babies they were dressed in pink, then put into little girls? dresses and made to play with dolls, do ballet and tap, and have their ears pierced. Then, dressed in schoolgirls uniforms, they attended classes to give them basic reading, writing and math skills only until the age of ten. They were then to attend the Maids Academy for full training as maids, including all the skills needed to keep a home clean and tidy, sewing, embroidery and etiquette. Particular emphasis was placed on personal hygiene, including the removal of all body hair, make up, beauty and fashion tips. Maids passing all the exams then graduated and were assigned to the home of woman to serve her completely. Throughout this process, boyish traits were highly discouraged and boys were made to be demure, submissive and eager to please and eager to follow the lead of a strong woman. Electrolysis was used on all pre-adolescent boys to prevent them ever having facial or body hair and boys were taught to speak in soft, dulcet tones. Boys were taught that women were superior in every way to them and must be obeyed. The will of even the strongest boys was broken so thoroughly that the end product would not dare to even open his mouth to contradict a female, let alone commit any act of rebellion. Girls attended a female only school, where boys could not disrupt classes or otherwise distract the girls, dressed in trousers and received a full education in all subjects and a full sports and extra curricular programme. All women were educated to degree level and then entered the workplace to embark on their careers. Throughout childhood and adolescence, women were encouraged to be leaders, to be assertive, competitive and opinionated and driven to succeed and were taught that all males were inferior to them in every way. Naturally, over time, this meant that the male became progressively weaker physically, intellectually feeble, timid mentally and emotionally stunted, while the development of females in all these areas became enhanced. Males became the weaker sex in every way and to the weaker sex is assigned the traditional feminine role, as distinct from the sexes. History was taught to both sexes to show that when men were given power and responsibility, centuries of warfare and suffering were the inevitable result and that only women had the wisdom to wield power for the benefit of everybody and that allowing men any measure of power was the recipe for disaster for mankind. Women were allowed, if they wished, to formally marry any maid in their service. The male selected for marriage had no choice in the matter and as per his upbringing would assume the role traditionally intended for the female and would attend the wedding fully dressed as a bride. In the ceremony, he would take an oath to obey his wife in all things and would take her name. Thereafter, he would assume his husbandly duties as homemaker and child rearer. When required by his wife to be presentable for her friends and business associates, he will have his hair, nails and make up done in a beauty salon, buy himself a new evening gown and dainty lingerie and become a pretty accessory to his wife on business and social meetings. Finally, laws were passed to deprive men of any rights under the law and made them the property of their wives, mothers, or the mistress they served as a maid. A woman had the right to punish any male or to transfer ownership of him to another mistress. Males, helpless and dependent upon a woman for the most basic essentials of life have no choice but to submit and obey. This is the future??.all trends and statistics point to it. After centuries of being held back and marginalized by men, it is now payback time. P.S As an inferior, but feminine male who bitterly laments not being born as a female, I would be proud to stand at the altar in my silk bridal gown, corset, petticoats and veil and submit to a strong woman and to thereafter serve her like a submissive handmaiden as I recognize that women are destined to rule.



Jasmine Jan 01 2010 3:56pm Sounds like Regiment of Women by Thomas Berger.



obedient husband Jan 02 2010 4:39pm My vision is extreme, but the main points hold good and are backed up by the statistics. Females are outperforming males and it is becoming increasingly apparent that not only is the male not superior to the female, he is not even her equal. It is human nature that when you encounter somebody who is less able than you you will at best feel pity and be slightly patronising to that person or at worst become so irritated by their failings that you will put them down or ridicule them - this is now what is beginning to happen between the superior woman and the inferior man. The next logical conclusion that woman will draw is that as men are inferior to them, they should not hold positions of power and responsibility, especially not over a woman, and should not even be entitled to vote. What the future holds is hard to say but the main issue is what is going to happen to millions of inferior men, who can't get the traditional jobs their father's had, won't retrain to do "women's work". The only avenue open to men is to be pleasing to their wives and a good homemaker and father. For those who want to be in the workplace, they will need to become more "feminine" not to the extent of adopting female dress and behaviour, but they will have to learn to speak in a more pleasing voice,pay ensure that they are well dressed and groomed, learn better communication and customer care skills and learn to multi-task. As these are not part of the male psyche, a painful period of learning and adjustment will be required. I can foresee that enforced cross-dressing will be increasingly used against naughty boys or house husbands who fail to keep house properly or be attentive to his wife, as women become more confident in their mastery. Interesting times lie ahead, especially for us males.



Jasmine Jan 03 2010 6:45am Further to my last post,the ascendancy of female over male is already upon us - women now outnumber men in the US workforce, the world's largest and most powerful economy and the this trend will extend to the rest of world, which tends to follow the lead of the USA. Males are being rapidly squeezed out of the workplace and education system (85% of the jobs lost in the current recession in the US were those of male employees) and are being subtley feminised by society - witness the tighter clothing for younger men, ear piercing and even male "make up" and more and more men are now resorting to surgery to make themselves look better and younger, and are using far more products to enhance their appearance than even 10 years ago. The long journey to the feminisation of the male is well underway and the end product will be radically different to the male of today. Some women are already using their power to impose enforced femininity upon their menfolk as a means of asserting their dominance and maintaining control - I read about it every day.



Jasmine Jan 07 2010 1:43pm No, the notion of female superiority is not being imprinted on the younger generation of males. All it does is give us gas and that warns us all about what your intentions are. That's when we explode and make life miserable for all of you female supremacists.



Zac Efron Jan 12 2010 11:38am No, tammi. The wife in those commercials posses average intelligence, whereas the husbund is clearly a retard.



an intelligent life form Jan 12 2010 12:59pm If my relationship is anything to go by, girls are totally in control. My girlfriend is not only taller than me but physically stronger too as she works out everyday. She is more confident and assertive than me and has a better paid job with real prospects whilst my career prospects are limited. My girl calls the shots in everything from home finances to what I get to wear. She has sensed that I am more "feminine" in personality than her and as I am smaller and weaker she wears sports underwear and I get to wear the pretty, lacy panties and when the fancy takes her, a complete outfit of her clothes which fit me reasonably well. I do all the cooking and housework and my girl says I will make her an sweet wife one day.



Jasmine Jan 13 2010 2:08am Equal rights must be demanded of all, by all. Authority must be earned, never given freely.



an intelligent life form Jan 20 2010 6:19pm Are any of you celebrities?



Julia Roberts Jan 24 2010 7:16pm Well, Julia, if we were surely you would have heard of us?



Jasmine Jan 26 2010 12:05am The question was 'Is the notion female superiority being imprinted on the younger generation?' I say yes and a good thing too! Males need to be understand that females are generaly brighter, better communicators, networkers, nourishers. We think faster, we can endure more pain, we live longer, we are less subject to disease and all our sesnses are more acute than the males. We are better multi-taskers and more balanced decision makers. This is not prejudice or misandry. Try reading a book guys! The weight of evidence for female superiority is awesome and mounting every day. The male brain fixated on aggression and sexual obsession makes it unsuitable to hold any decision role in society. The poor dears are just not up to it. The last two thoudand years is proof enough if you doubt me. In my view tertiary education should almost exclusively reserved for females. Its kinda going that way anyway! Boys should be taught how to read and write and basic arithmetic. That will be sufficient for most. After that they can undertake vocational courses that our useful to women in society. The dirty. menial, brain free tasks that that the Superior gender do not wish to do. Its really time accepted these these self evident truths and learned to live with it.



Sylvia Feb 09 2010 11:48am Sylvia,f*ck women in society. This is a man's world. You get back into the kitchen and keep your big mouth shut.



Gloria Steinam and Robin Morgan Mar 22 2010 2:02am Does anybody have any kleenex?



Snot Nose Mar 22 2010 2:14am If women are such great nourishers, this is all the more reason for them to stay home and take care of their kids.



Feminist Man Mar 22 2010 2:15am Check out the website "Femulate" - it's a scarily accurate picture of the role reversal steadily taking place between the sexes and very amusing too! Before too long women will be wearing the trousers, literally, and men will be in dresses. It's the future.



Jasmine Apr 19 2010 11:55am About 8% of males have color-vision deficiency compared with only 0.4% of females, a 20 to 1 advantage for the female. Dichromasy, the most severeform of color-vision deficiency occurs in about 2% of males and only 0.02% of females, a 100 to 1 advantage for women. I took a color-vision test with my wife. I could not determine the numbers among all the colored dots. She tried to show me the numbers by drawing over them with a pen in an attempt to help me see the numbers. It only made mattters worse for me. I felt so inferior to her at that point. She got 6 of 6 test plates correct while I got only 1 of 6 correct. She said, "Now will you admit you are color blind?" What could I say?



Color-blind Male (green deficient) Apr 19 2010 2:26pm There is no question that females have made enormous gains in educational achievement, while males have lagged farther and farther behind. In 1985 the college population was divided about equally between males and females. As of 2010 the college student population is about 60% female to 40% male, a substantial change over the 25-year period. There is no evidence that males are doing anything to stop this female advance. What will the situation be 25 years from now. A straight-line projection would suggest 70% female to 30% male. Even if the trend slows a bit, we could easily end up with 65% female and 35% male by 2035. I am not sure if females are actually smarter than males on average, but what is certain is that the female develops much faster than the male and reches the various stages of maturity much earlier. While there is evidence that the female is more mature than the male starting at birth, the maturity gap becomes most pronoumced during the teens and early 20's, coincidng with middle school, high school, and college. I think society would be better if males started first grade one to two years later than females and that the system allow grade promotion based on achievement. The result would be that females, on average, would progress through the grades faster while many males would be held back until they were mentally ready to master the work. My guess is that females would finish high school in the range of 14 to 18 with an average age of 16-1/2. Males would finish betwen 18 and 25 with an average age of 22. O.K., the boys would take 5 to 6 years lnger to get to the same place as the more mature girls, but I think they would be better able to compete with girls for admission to college. Comments please.



Jack Apr 21 2010 7:31pm Jack,the way I see it is it is not just a question of girls maturing earlier than boys, which as you rightly say is an established fact and gives them the advantage in the education system, but the main issue as I see it is that the traditional gender sterotypes are STILL prevailing and that males are failing to recognise that perpetuating the old macho sterotypes and the old system of advancing males over females simply because they are males is no longer working for them - they are rejecting education because they associate it with femininity and they are terrified to identify with femininity. The results are obvious - males are falling further and further behind when compared to females and it is very scary to think where this will lead - to millions of unemployable, unmarriagable males who feel that they have no stake in society and will commit crimes to validate their existence - I am not exaggerating here - there is a real danger of anarchy and the collapse of civilsation. What you suggest is part of the solution but what needs to happen before anything is for males be discard the traditional male sterotype and to embrace the ready made alternative - femininity - yes it will be painful and humiliating for the male to remove his pants and put on the frilly, feminine attire usually worn by women but once the transition has taken place the femme male, stripped of redundant stereotypes, will appreciate his new found femininity and be better able to relate to women and girls and become more like them and thus hope to achieve parity with them. The road to true equality will be achieved once all males are in skirts and can accept femininity as THE positive force in mankind's future.



Jasmine Apr 24 2010 3:34pm I've been looking at a website called the "Demale Society", which is a secret society dedicated to the feminisation of males by petticoating, discipline, drugs and therapy to reduce or eradicate the testosterone in the male body and to inculcate into the subject feminine behaviours. Their rationale is that males are (largely but not totally) responsible for the problems this planet face and by reducing their testosterene levels and reprogramming them with femininity wars and other disasters will be eradicated. They aim to demale all males one at a time, which could take some time but will exempt some males (called Remales) deemed to be essential for reproduction, heavy manual work or just there to please women. The feminisation of males sounds good, especially for a feminine male like myself who would offer no resistance - I would love to be feminised - but I was disturbed to read their SCUM manifesto. Never have I seen the male gender described in such negative and bleak terms - it essentially said that all males are deformed females and project their negative qualities onto females while appropriating "male virtues" (which are actually female qualities). They advocate the complete eradication of males - they are not even useful for reproduction apparently - by means of women withdrawing from public life and thus bringing civilisation to a grinding halt. Once civilisation has collapsed, women will fill the vaccum and take over and eliminate the economy on the grounds that mankind is advanced enough to become automated so that women only have to work a few hours a week. Males who resist this process are liquidated and the survivors either end up in female attire and serving females or embittered and impotent relics living out a meaningless afterlife. Once the males are gone, the females follow. It is the most bleak tract I have ever read - surely the future for both women and men can be better than this?



Jasmine Apr 24 2010 4:07pm By the way, in case you haven't guessed, I am a firm adovocate of male femininity. I believe that the best interests of society will be served when traditional femininity - so derided for so long - is imposed on us males, myself included, by females to encourage or force us into corsetry, frilly knickers, bras, dresses, skirts, blouses, make up and jewellery and to strive to be beautiful and ladylike - whilst the women abandon their feminine trappings and adopt more masculine/unisex clothing which is more practical for their role of breadwinners and leaders. I acknowledge that women are superior to men. In the past it was assumed that men were the stronger sex, women were "feminised" which included the wearing of pretty and restrictive clothing and being forced to be submissive and pleasing. That kind of worked in the past because men were physically stronger and were needed to build the civilisation we enjoy today. However,the future of mankind going forward relies on brain, not brawn, and it is clear that as the intellectually superior gender, women are the future leaders, so what is happening is that women are abandoning femininity as this is no longer relevant to their new status. Males, finding that the old male dominated system no longer works for them, are either discovering femininity for themselves or having it imposed on them by the stronger woman. This will result in an inversion of the sexes where trousered females will rule over skirted males. Males, once the undisputed masters of the earth, preoccupied with mastery and conquest, will become the servants of women,now preoccupied with runs in their tights, touching up their make up, and what sexy lingerie they should wear to please their dominant wife. This is the future - males will have to adjust to learnt to serve women and do so with a pretty curtsey and a smile as they serve.



Jasmine Apr 24 2010 4:57pm We males, the afterthought sex (we all start out as female in the womb), must cease and desist with our inbred silly notions that we are the stronger sex. If not it will only make it harder to adapt the more the superior female organism takes prominence! Girls are born with the more sophisticated brains, sensory superiority sheer stamina and a sexual arsenal embodied in their amazing clitorises that no boy can match. So why all the angst? Lets give the girls their due before they decide to castrate us at birth!!!



Mr. Mike May 07 2010 8:29pm Hey there, new (inferior) guy again. After a closer examination of the above comments, I was surprised to read STTG's premise that some men jerk-off to this site. And no, I don't doubt it for a minute. Leave it to the male sex to lay about having a wank while girls and women close in on us from every corner! That alone should prove how lazy, lame and stupid my sex really is. Whilst the House Of Patriarchal Superiority Fantasies burns to the ground, we are too busy playing with our peckers to notice. But then, I've never understood the "male as the weaker sex - female domination thing" that many men find so sexually necessary. Probably because I'm GAY ! Even at that I have a hard (?) time getting it up when I realise where my sex his heading so willy-nilly and without a backup plan. WAKE UP, BOYS AND SMELL THE SMOKE !!!



Mr. Mike May 08 2010 4:54pm Hey there, new (inferior) guy again. After a closer examination of the above comments, I was surprised to read STTG's premise that some men jerk-off to this site. And no, I don't doubt it for a minute. Leave it to the male sex to lay about having a wank while girls and women close in on us from every corner! That alone should prove how lazy, lame and stupid my sex really is. Whilst the House Of Patriarchal Superiority Fantasies burns to the ground, we are too busy playing with our peckers to notice. But then, I've never understood the "male as the weaker sex - female domination thing" that many men find so sexually necessary. Probably because I'm GAY ! Even at that I have a hard (?) time getting it up when I realise where my sex his heading so willy-nilly and without a backup plan. WAKE UP, BOYS AND SMELL THE SMOKE !!!



Mr. Mike May 08 2010 5:00pm Men, on average, still outperform women on intelligence tests (look it up). But the public schools and the media are completely geared torwards feminism. Women in power are more likely to abuse their power (ever get pulled over by a female cop). Women are not superior, but its time for a feminist society and we'll all suffer because of it.



valerie p. May 16 2010 8:25am Boys learn differently than girls. Girls learn best by rote and repetition. Boys learn best by action and practice. As a society we have consigned our boys to the bottom of the scholastic heap (as stats now show), precisely because we teach them like they are girls. One size does not fit all. Boys need to be demonstrative in their quest to acquire knowledge. Sitting at a desk all day bores a boy and makes him restless. He has no outlet for the physicality he comes by so naturally. Gender separation is necessary in schools in order to bring up male test scores. The fact remains that males tend to occupy the upper and lower extremes on I.Q. test scores where as girls and women tend to take up the middle. Reports that I have read have concluded that when I.Q. tests are structured to be gender-neutral, GIRLS outscore boys by approximately 3-5 points. And indeed with girls proven sensory superiority (50% better sight, hearing, smell, taste and memory), it's no small wonder girls are poised from birth onward to exceed the accomplishments of boys.



Mr. Mike May 17 2010 1:53pm Boys learn differently than girls. Girls learn best by rote and repetition. Boys learn best by action and practice. As a society we have consigned our boys to the bottom of the scholastic heap (as stats now show), precisely because we teach them like they are girls. One size does not fit all. Boys need to be demonstrative in their quest to acquire knowledge. Sitting at a desk all day bores a boy and makes him restless. He has no outlet for the physicality he comes by so naturally. Gender separation is necessary in schools in order to bring up male test scores. The fact remains that males tend to occupy the upper and lower extremes on I.Q. test scores where as girls and women tend to take up the middle. Reports that I have read have concluded that when I.Q. tests are structured to be gender-neutral, GIRLS outscore boys by approximately 3-5 points. And indeed with girls proven sensory superiority (50% better sight, hearing, smell, taste and memory), it's no small wonder girls are poised from birth onward to exceed the accomplishments of boys.



Mr. Mike May 17 2010 2:18pm I wish to thank Jasmine for responding to my proposal that boys should go to school with younger girls to help offset faster maturation in girls. To help benchmark this phonomenon, at what age or age range do boys finally "catch up" to the level of an agerage 16-year-old girl? To put it another way, do you think that by 21 or 22 boys are on the level of a female age 16?



Jack Jun 02 2010 5:34am Hi Jack. I think that the answer to the question of what age range boys catch up with girls is simply, they don't. The female brain is wired into both hemispheres whilst the male brain is limited to just one hemisphere so a female is capable of doing more with her brain than her male peer. As you have pointed out already, girls mature faster than boys and their concentration span is far longer whilst boys are easily distracted and have short attention spans. The education system favours course work and group activities which girls thrive at and boys struggle with because they get distracted and have more limited communication and teamworking skills than girls. With these disadvantages, it's little wonder that females are now outperforming males by a wide margin at every level of the education system and that margin is getting wider each year as more girls attend higher education and more boys drop out. Unfortunately for males, the situation does not get equal in adulthood. A woman is a lot smarter and emotionally stronger than any man and she will always be superior to him. Ultimately, I can see a segregation of the sexes in the education systems - girls will go to science and tech colleges to ready them for university and good careers. The authorities will reason that it is a waste of time giving boys much education and so they will attend state schools and learn basic math and literacy and skills that will equip them for menial jobs or a future role as househusband for the superior, well-educated career woman.



Jasmine Jun 02 2010 11:24am I must partially disagree with the cliche ridden generalizations put forth by Jasmine in her response to Jack above. The male brain is wired to focus on one hemisphere at a time (predominantly). The connective pathway which affords girls easier dual hemisphere brain function is undeniably thicker and enriched with a greater number of neurons than the corpus callosum of boys - yet boys perform as well as or only slightly less so than girls on I.Q. tests. (That must irk the men-should-wear-dresses crowd!) It's one thing to gloat about the obvious gains girls have made academically, but to misrepresent the scope and degree of said gains makes me wonder just how superior some women really are? Are they so desperate to turn the tables on boys and men that they must resort to stretching the truth? Wouldn't today's girls be better served by their female elders if women like Jasmine chose not to adopt the very same tactics that men have used for centuries to subjugate females? Surely eschewing such erroneous (though historically successful) male nonsense would prove women infinitely superior to the biologically weaker sex! Aw, what the hell, let's give Jasmine the benefit of the doubt and hope that she is speaking with tongue firmly implanted in cheek (those above the waist!). Otherwise, I have a difficult time taking her seriously when the main focus of her purportedly superior brain routinely, as if on auto-pilot, digresses into vengeance seeking fantasies concerned with (and I'm a Gay Man, here!) turning men into subservient drag queens! Drag Queens are bar-none, the biggest bitches on der erde! TRUST! You DO NOT want a cross-dressing husband, housebound or otherwise! (Been there, did that, paid the sky-high millinery bills). Better you should fully castrate your "househusband" (as you've already done mentally with just one glance, I'm sure) and sew the relinquished sex organs on as your own. Until then, save it for your next life, sweetie and spare us all the smug eugenics - just come back as a man next time and get the bloody-hell on with it! (By the way Jazz, Gay Men and women have nearly identical corpus callosums!). Stick to the facts, dahling, before they stick to you!



Mr. Mike Jun 02 2010 8:17pm Dear Mr Mike. You clearly haven't read my previous posts in full as I am in fact a genetic male and don't need to castrate any males as I have all the equipment a male should have. I find your references to my assumed "cheeks below the waist" highly offensive the use of which reveals your low opinion of females, or perhaps it is fear, and anyway such remarks make it difficult to take you seriously. However, I am flattered and amused that you believed me to be a genetic female as I wish I had been born as one. I am merely an unhappy, feminine male who recognises that women are superior. Regardless of how well boys do in IQ Tests all of the statistics I have seen show that boys are falling behind academically at EVERY level - in the US and the UK 67% of girls leave university with good degrees compared to about 50% of boys and the majority of undergraduates and post graduates are female. In the UK, the majority of medical and law students are now female and again fewer males are entering these professions each year. It is not just IQ that matters but attitude and the signs are that girls are focused on getting good grades and good careers, whilst boys get distracted and demotivated. In the last recession (aka the he-cession or man-cession due to the loss of million of jobs held by males), very few women lost their jobs as women are now the workers of the future due to their motivation, energy, better communication skills and better equipped intellectually and emotionally to function in an ever changing global economy. In the UK, it was recently reported that the number of househusbands shot up from 60000 in 2000 to 600000 in 2010 - the main reason? The female spouse earnt more and the male could not equal her wage and so simple economics meant he has to stay at home and mind the house and kids. More women, frustrated with the glass ceiling, are quitting the corporate ladder and starting their own businesses and being their own bosses and fewer men are starting businesses. I could on, but I won't. Mr Mike, the truth of female superiority is evident and if you can't handle it that is your problem. And by the way, I wear a dress and I certainly not a bitch and I hope I come back as a woman next time.



Jasmine Jun 02 2010 10:17pm Jasmine, allow me to point out, if you will, that you might have overlooked my previous posts with your assumption that I have a problem admitting that the female is the distaff, biologically better put together sex. My previous postings say exactly that. In fact as I suspect, you may very well have read my musings but as a disgruntled, embittered outcast of either sex, are so closed off to the opinions of men that differ from your own or do not validate your fence-straddling choices, that you presume all men to be idiots. In short, disillusioned with your own fractured existence, you have arbitrarily written off every man and boy on the planet as servant and subjugate to the sisterhood you so tragically lament being left out of by accident of birth. Pardon me while I grab my sad rag! How unfortunate to air such profound shortcomings in a venue so cold and impersonal as this. Is there, perchance, therapy and surgery in your future? As to not picking up on your self-imposed surface attempt at gender reassignment - no sooner did I spot all that psycho-babble putting househusbands everywhere in curlers and taffeta bustiers when I found myself rummaging through my former and now deceased, tranny BFF's chest of abandoned apparel, thus completely losing sight of your gender affiliations - wishy-washy and thus difficult to discern except with a flashlight and full-boy search, as they must be. How can a reasonably intelligent man such as myself sit through the hysterical fantasies of a person who discounts honest discourse. Before my opinion is on the table, you have me lumped in to a category that presumes my opinions to be lacking in both validity and experience. I am not a hater of women. Nor of men! It is you, Herr Quisling that hates your own kind! That much my pee-brained male mind somehow managed to glean from your posts. I do not believe any one to be better than his or her opposite if it requires knocking that person down and using their prostrate body in order to hoist ones self up! Save your self-loathing for someone who is as equally imprisoned in his skin as you are. We all face limitations and self-doubt, but taking an entire sex down in your flames of sour-grapes is not the answer, dearest Jazz. I didn't spend five years trying to help my above mentioned friend through his unsuccessful and eventually suicidal quest for gender reassignment and walk away with nothing. Again, you misconstrue the facts regarding societies wholesale abandonment of boys in the classroom. I.Q. does matter as it suggests the foundation of intelligence and the potential realization of that intellectual capacity. You have stated that males are totally lacking in such endeavors. BUNK! If you feel ignorant and, ergo inferior in your undesired male form, please afford those of us at peace with our penises and testosterone the chance to break free of your men-are-little-more-than-stupid-beasts, mentality. Is that what drove you in to wearing a dress? About your "facts": girls (in the U.S.) have not caught up with boys in math. Your data is no doubt skewered with the same anti-male wishful thinking of those who wish it to be so. Like it or not, males enjoy a superiority in spatial and abstract thought that no amount of girl-favoring in the classroom has yet overcome. it is a plus due to our supposedly inferior, poorly connected hemispheres! Who knew! Likewise boys have always trailed girls in reading and other rote skills (Please see my womyn-hatin' entry above - the one you ignored). Oh, forgive me you must be stuck back on the page marked "Mourning What Might Have Been". I see the differences in male-female brains as complementary. Where one leaves off the other picks up. Males have focus while females have breadth. One could only be superior if possessed of both. And here is where I have an edge over the hetero-males you so belittle (your sad self included): research suggests that homosexual men have a more female imprinted brain yet still within basic male parameters! So, please do not discount the entire male race with your female wanna-be generalizations. What you are or "posted" yourself as being, carries little clout in our discussion since you have made this, with a broad sweep of the brush, about an entire gender and not the individuals we all are. Ignorance (fear based, I suspect) hears what it wants to hear. I am the last person who would presume to try and interest you in opening your mind or accepting your biological reality. Just don't hem me in as a man with your psycho-sexual limitations. I would love to be forever 21, as alluring and sexual as I was way back when - but to ignore reality is pure denial. I do not begrudge you your opinion - I just feel at a loss to see what should be serious discussion returned as if in a wigged-out time machine, to the realm of medieval mindsets stuck on Lords turned Ladies, corsets, gowns and serfdom. Is this, then, Jasmine, what you would sentence the entire male sex too? I look forward to your next posting. In the meantime do find a sense of humor!



Mr. Mike Jun 03 2010 3:57pm I realize this female superiority stuff feeds into people's femdom fantasies, and if that's your bag, go to it. I like to play the submissive role myself sometimes with women but it stops as a bedroom game. Even if women are healthier, or smarter (and I say, IF) or better off than men in any capacity it still doesn't follow that men should serve women. You guys and gals are just feeding your own fantasies here. People have different strengths and weaknesses, some of them are male and some of them are female. No gender is, by default of their gender, "superior". However, if people want to play that role then that's there business. The problem I have with all of this is the tendency among the people here to talk about males as if they are degenerate, ignorant imbeciles and believe that it is desirable to teach this to children. By your logic any one who is handicapped must submit to the health "superior" people because they are physically inferior. That's the natural result from the argument here that because women have better chromosomes or recover better from illnesses that they should rule the world, LOL. It just doesn't make any sense. Ladies, go out in the world and be as successful as you can. That is your right and if you end up being the dominant sex, more power to you. However, I think you will find that things are likely to just about even out and that is all. Now that women have more opportunity it is no wonder that women are making great strides, now that there is less oppression. The discrepancy in power was bound to start to balance out. However, it is highly unlikely that you will achieve a matriarchal society with the "dumb" subserviant males as your hired help. There just isn't that much difference between the sexes. Sorry, but it doesn't make sense. Play your femdom games in the bedroom or in your own relationships if you like, but don't you dare go infecting your male children or anyone's children with the idea that they are just a dumb inferior male who needs to be seated at a woman's feet in order to have any value.



Pat Jun 03 2010 7:27pm I was merely trying to convey the point that all of the statistics I have seen are pointing to a situation where females are gaining superiority over males in the education system and which will carry over into employment market. Females are becoming the main breadwinners in their families so males are increasingly finding themselves as the stay at home father or are having to come to terms with the fact that they will never earn as much as their female partner. With girls doing better and better at school and university this trend will continue and accelerate. I believe that this will ultimately lead to a reversal of the traditional roles but I don't advocate that males should be feminised - I am a feminine male purely by choice but can certainly appreciate that to forcibly feminise a male against his will is wrong - however, ultimately, the way things are going, power will lie with women. This is not a fantasy, this is fast becomine reality. I don't disrepect males - we have our merits and the world would be a lot less interesting without us - but of late with the rapid advance of women and girls - men do appear to be losing a lot of ground to women and there are frequently articles in the press and online that express concern over a "crisis of masculinity" and and urgent need to help boys in the classroom before they fall too far behind their female peers. Males and females are both valuable but the gender roles are becoming reversed and it is an unsettling and confusing time for both men and women.



Jasmine Jun 03 2010 10:25pm Mr Mike - this is not about me - I am insignificant in the grand scheme of things. I just try to interpret the trends.



Jasmine Jun 04 2010 5:12pm Jasmine, I don't find it "unsettling" that women are earning a better position for themselves in society. What I find unsettling is the attitude towards men on this board - that they should just accept their place and sit down in the street with a burka on, so to speak. Teaching this to children will have a severely detrimental effect on a young boy's self esteem. Not because he's been beat out by a female, which is an incredibly sexist point of view in itself, but that he is incapable because he is male. That's the position that the feminazi bitches who advocate female supremacy advocate. Also, there are some bitch males in the femdom community who see themselves as worthless and buy into this crap about being a lowly male worm. As far as the statistics go, yes women may be over taking men in universities, but I don't see it as anything but a natural balancing out. Of course, it won't be 50/50 but do you honestly see society becoming completely female dominated? It's unrealistic to believe that one gender could so dominate the other by sheer natural ability. Our male dominated society has been unnaturally preserved and a female dominated society would require the same type of control to keep men down. One thing that concerns me about young men is the immaturity and idiocy I see among the group. For whatever reason, they do seem to be getting more irresponsible as time goes on. If that trend continues then I can see a scenario where women will assume most of the leadership positions but it will never be total. Remember, the greatest geniuses our world has ever known have been predominantly men. If there is a crisis with males performing poorly in schools I think it is a cultural and social problem amongst young males, not a male defect and it can be corrected. As for the women who need to see themsel