In order to achieve the ideal of equality and justice for all in the United States of America, people deserve equal access to plentiful work opportunities and there ought to be a job that is guaranteed for each and every American citizen and immigrant. However, those who are easily intrigued by a seemingly progressive proposal from so-called “forward thinkers,” will be lured into the trap of supporting Universal Basic Income, which makes ludicrous claims to help lift the poor out of complete destitution, but in actuality, it is an insidious plan to keep the poor trapped and unable to support themselves through the most dignified means — a job. And the Federal Jobs Guarantee is a far superior and more practical solution because it has absolutely no influence from Libertarian or capitalist ideals.

The Federal Minimum wage must first be set to $15 and then what needs to follow is a policy that makes it mandatory for people to work a job created by the Federal Government in order to ensure that highly important work gets done such as digging ditches, rebuilding infrastructure, providing quality customer service at fast food joints, and filling out routine paperwork for the Federal Government. The majority of people struggle with knowing what they want to do (and thus, they are incapable of finding a job that is a right fit for them), so it is best for the government to dictate what will be the most suitable form of work because only then will the most important work get done and people can better identify what they are able to do, even if they previously had no idea before.

Unlike Universal Basic Income, Federal Jobs Guarantee provides all Americans the chance to prove that they were born with a solid work ethic deemed acceptable by society’s standards. Universal Basic Income only gives free money to everyone and the rich will only get richer because of this, which we must prevent at all costs for the benefit of the working class. Because in order to be fair to every ordinary American, it is better for a rich person to be deprived of $12,000 than to have both the rich and poor person gain $12,000, no matter how much the poor person really needs $12,000 after losing work and still not qualifying for unemployment or any form of aid. As long as the rich receive no extra money, the poor will benefit (don’t listen to the Libertarians who senselessly argue that the poor desperately need cash). The rich must not get richer, period!

Universal Basic Income is a program created by a Libertarian Trojan horse that would hurt the poor, but a Federal Guaranteed job can lift them out of poverty and give them a chance to survive

Bot supporters of a Democratic candidate with a hidden Libertarian agenda claim that Universal Basic Income will free the poor by enabling them to make decisions on how they will spend the money that’s already circulating around and being reallocated to them.

This is a highly counterproductive and downright evil capitalistic solution that would keep millions of people in poverty trapped in poverty — and it is obvious that the Libertarians do not understand the obvious fact that a poor family starting at $0 is much better off than if they were starting at $12,000! Only a job can help poor people prove their worth and give them a measurable sense of pride that only comes from working for 40 hours a week on a job they don’t enjoy and gaining the benefits that come with the job. Work is work and enjoyment is a detriment that prevents work from getting done. Nobody should ever feel like their lives mean anything without work that’s utterly deprived of joy. Because the joy that comes for free makes life less meaningful, while busywork adds meaning to lives that would have been empty otherwise. The government, not the people, decides what is meaningful for us.

There is no substitute for hard work and all people who cannot find work still ought to work and the government will aid them in providing a job for them to do so that they are better able to prove they can be productive enough to hold a job that serves the interests of the Federal Government.

But what if a person is struggling to find work after losing his job? The solution to this problem is not free money to help with the transition between jobs but rather another job that is lined up, even if he has no prior qualifications for it.

All people, regardless of past experiences and education, deserve a chance at proving themselves through a job because a job is a basic human right that the government is able to provide through efficient budgeting, which is something a mathematically conniving Libertarian posing as a Democrat could never do — by proving that the government can afford to give $12,000 to every American, he’s obviously serving the interests of high tech companies and his army of bots, not the poor people or those who are suffering hardships after losing their ability to work.

On the other hand, politicians and economists in favor of Federal Jobs Guarantee have done the most accurate calculations to prove how creating jobs by simply writing bills and mandating a guaranteed job in every state is by far the best use of government spending in history (even if creating one job costs more than simply providing UBI for an individual, as long as the Libertarian agenda isn’t passed, it’s considered most cost-effective to keep creating jobs for people who may or may not be suited to work).

This plan would eradicate corruption that would have occurred as a result of Libertarian Trojan horses handing the less fortunate folks “free” money, which would only debilitate them if they are struggling to survive, pay the bills, pay for unexpected emergencies (which would prevent them from working), and provide for their families. People are still not entitled to government money without first earning it. Even if they don’t have time to work when they have to take care of other people in their family who suffer from illnesses, that is absolutely not a valid excuse for them not to show up at the jobs that the government needs for them to do. What must be done to make our country even more productive and prosperous is far more important than what needs to get done to provide emotional support to even one’s own family.

By default, anyone who receives cash directly will only be harmed by it, not helped because the only legitimate means of helping oneself is a mandatory job that the government creates for every American.

All Federal Guaranteed jobs are free from exploitation and will maximize the effectiveness of government spending

All humans are innately worthy…to work a job. They must rise up to a high standard of dignity set by the Federal Government because how else can they prove that they are dignified?

But the Libertarian con artists and their scheming bots will tell you that the government has the ability to exploit those who work under their guaranteed jobs.

This simply isn’t true. The government is fair to all people who work jobs that they are not necessarily qualified for and all people are entitled to jobs without having to prove they’ve met basic prerequisites for each job they apply for. Exploitation is just a scare tactic from futurists who want people to create their own jobs and be entrepreneurial, which hurts the poor, and it’s absolutely critical for Federal Jobs Guarantee to be implemented before entrepreneurial free spirits use their slimy Libertarian dollars to take over the United States and make humanity prosper at Maslow’s highest hierarchy of needs (self-actualization) — this is a disastrous and downright dystopian situation that would weaken government power, and weakening the government’s power to employ everybody will definitely hurt the poor. We must prevent the poor from being entrepreneurial or working for an entrepreneurial boss that actually treats them fairly. The government is always going to be fairer and less exploitative than the manager of a family-owned creative business funded with UBI!

Instead, let’s take a former fashion stylist and make her a government loan officer. Let’s take a former McDonald’s worker and make him teach linguistics to kindergarteners. Let’s take a former English teacher and make him build bridges. Let’s take socially anxious people and make them interact with rude and inconsiderate customers for 40 hours a week without a break — who cares if they get burnt out easily from too much social interaction? Who cares if they’re better suited for some other job? People who know what they’re good at and interested in must never be trusted. The government knows what’s best for everybody and having choices is an ideal that capitalists and Libertarians want to fulfill, but it is detrimental for the poor to choose what they want for a long-term career. They must have a minimum wage job mandated by the government to be financially secure, regardless of personal interests.

The government’s agenda must come first and foremost, while self-awareness (knowing oneself and the extent of one’s capabilities, motivations, and purpose) must be tempered down in order for work to be done in a manner that the government dictates. The dissenters of this policy are against the poor and self-awareness should never be an excuse as to why they can’t work a government job. Because passion and self-actualization are two Libertarian ideals that undermine the government’s plan to employ every American 18 and above.

Universal Basic Income is enslavement to Libertarian propaganda while a dictated job is a means of acquiring true liberty because Thomas Paine and Martin Luther King Jr. obviously were more in favor of government creating a job for everyone as opposed to income that’s unconditional for every American citizen. Giving free money enslaves the poor by helping them pay for expenses that they couldn’t have afforded otherwise, while a mandated federal job will provide them with the means to pay for a high bill that’s late…yet it will provide them the money a week later, only after they have put in the 40 hours to pay for the bill and even if the payment is late and they need to pay extra late fees, FJG still is a vastly superior way to help the poor pay their late bills than “free” capitalist-tainted cash that starts at $1,000. Capitalism should start at $0 to minimize government spending so that more can be spent on creating jobs in a manner that is no different from the way the brain conjures up apparitions.

Every person is guaranteed a job, even the ones who physically aren’t able to work or suffer from setbacks that prevent them from working — they still have a guaranteed way to earn a living

Proponents of Universal Basic Income make false claims and assumptions about people who are physically incapable of working and are in dire circumstances that prevent them from working because they want to slander politicians in support of Federal Jobs Guarantee. It’s not because they are concerned about the poor and those who can’t work. You need to consider this carefully: they want to further their Libertarian Trojan horse agenda, which hurts those who are incapable of working and those who can’t hold a job due to debilitating disabilities should never be given cash unconditionally because a Federal Job will take care of that, not a Libertarian policy that allows people to decide what they need to pay for the most, even if it’s an emergency they cannot control because they need to put in the work to deserve having the ability to pay for the unexpected emergency.

Living should never be unconditional, period. The foolproof policy of government jobs must come before anything else and must be defended, even when people are physically unable to work. The politicians with most experience know that Federal Jobs Guarantee is indeed the most efficient and beneficial way to lift the physically disabled person out of poverty, regardless of how severe the disability is and how it disrupts normal human functions.

Let’s suppose there is a family comprised of a father who is a veteran with major injuries that prevent him from working, a mother with Stage IV breast cancer, and two children over the age of 18 who have genetic disorders and mental illnesses that prevent them from being productive at their full capacity. You need to be very careful about how you approach this kind of family situation because the Libertarian Trojan horses will lure you into their snares by claiming that providing unconditional income for these four adults $48,000 will lift them above the poverty line and help them survive when they are too ill and disabled to work. Not so!

Why is Federal Jobs Guarantee more helpful to this particular family (with all four members who are physically unable to work) than this sinister Libertarian agenda formed by a capitalist mercenary?

UBI would keep them trapped in poverty with $48,000! On the other hand, FJG will keep these four people employed at $124,800, which is much more money than Libertarians claim that UBI will provide. After all, the disabled veteran father can be a good factory worker, even if he was shot in the arm while he was stationed overseas. The mother who’s stuck in the hospital with cancer can be a good nurse — she just needs to be coerced by her boss to get up for nine hours a day and then go back to rest on the hospital bed. The two children with rare chronic illnesses and severe depression will wholeheartedly become masters at filling out important and highly complex paperwork for government security! Only then will they find satisfaction in their lives through government-mandated hard work.

After all, the more dependent people are on their employers and the government to provide work to do, the freer they are and Federal Jobs Guarantee is the only legitimate policy to ensure the liberty, dignity, health, and overall happiness for every American.