Flask is a new microframework for web development. Created by Armin Ronacher, it grew from an April Fools’ prank into an elegant, usable tool in a very short time, mostly thanks to its clever leveraging of Armin’s two other babies, the Werkzeug webserver and the Jinja2 templating language.

I work daily with Django and love it, but after reading about Flask I got a small case of microframework envy. Why can’t Django development scale down as well as it scales up, and let a beginner have fun with single-file web development without becoming swamped in the full complexity of modern web development? It turns out Django can easily scale down.

Single-file Django

import os from django.conf.urls.defaults import patterns from django.http import HttpResponse filepath, extension = os.path.splitext(__file__) ROOT_URLCONF = os.path.basename(filepath) def yoohoo(request): return HttpResponse('Yoohoo!') urlpatterns = patterns('', (r'^hello/$', yoohoo))

If you’re not familiar with Django, this code simply defines a 2-line function ( yoohoo ) that accepts an HTTP Request and returns a webpage to the browser. In Django this is called a view. After we create the view, we have to associate it with a URL. The last line of code simply means “when someone asks for the page http://your.server.com/hello/ , run the yoohoo view and display the result”.

To try this code out in Mac OSX or Linux, all you need to do is install Django, copy the above code into /some/path/to/somefile.py and type the following incantation into a terminal: PYTHONPATH=/some/path/to DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE=somefile django-admin.py runserver

This will run a local webserver in your machine, which you can access by opening http://localhost:8000/yoohoo/ in your browser. Not too bad for a single file with 10 lines of code.

Look Ma, no project!

If you’re familiar with Django, you might have noticed what’s missing: we didn’t have to run the usual django-admin.py startproject someproject to create the initial Django project skeleton. This means there is no manage.py file, no settings.py , no urls.py , no views.py , and no Django app in sight. Projects are really a superfluous convenience, as James Bennett argues in Practical Django Projects. The file manage.py is simply a shallow wrapper around django-admin.py that adds its directory to PYTHONPATH and points the DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE to the settings.py in its directory. By explicitly passing these two parameters to django-admin.py as we did in the above incantation, we eliminate the need for manage.py .

Actually settings.py hasn’t disappeared, we’re just calling it somefile.py or whatever you prefer. The thing is, it probably doesn’t look like a settings.py to you if you’re used to Django. What happened?

It turns out that Django has sensible defaults for much of the stuff that usually goes into settings.py . The absolute minimal settings.py only has to define the ROOT_URLCONF variable and point it to the urls.py module that usually contains the URLs for you Django project. In our single-file Django example, we’re actually pointing the ROOT_URLCONF to the somefile.py file itself.

As for the urls.py file, it hasn’t so much disappeared as merged with settings.py into somefile.py . The same goes for what would usually be the views.py file. We have a single view merged into the somefile.py file. The only restriction is that we must make sure our views are defined before we refer to them in our urlpatterns .

Look Ma, no django-admin.py!

The problem is, typing PYTHONPATH=/some/path/to DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE=somefile django-admin.py runserver seems too much of a mouthful to be typing all the time. It almost makes you want to create a project just so you can type python manage.py runserver . Repent, O ye of shallow faith! Copy this code into a file named django and give it execution permissions with chmod +x django :

#! /usr/bin/env sh USAGE="Usage: `basename $0` path/to/module.py django_command [arg1 arg2 ...]" if [ "$#" == "0" ]; then echo "$USAGE" exit 1 fi module=`basename $1 .py` dir=`dirname $1` if [ -n "${PYTHONPATH}" ]; then NEWPATH=$PYTHONPATH:$dir else NEWPATH=$dir fi shift echo PYTHONPATH=$NEWPATH DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE=$module django-admin.py [email protected] PYTHONPATH=$NEWPATH DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE=$module django-admin.py [email protected]

Using this, you can now simply type ./django ./somefile.py runserver and run your projectless Django code as easily as within a project.

Django Templates

As so often happens with this kind of minimalistic example of microframework usage, our 12-line example looks enticingly simple but is not very realistic. In real life, the HttpResponse returned by the yoohoo view expects to be fed not a simple string such as "Yoohoo!" but a long and complex string containing your HTML code. Now, we could build that string incrementally inside the view function as people did in the good old ASP times, but by now we all should know that this leads to very brittle code and should never be taught to beginners, lest they stray from the righteous path. Instead of embedding HTML into our Python code, we’re going to embed a simplified kind of code into our HTML, using Django Templates. Fortunately, adding templates to our minimal django example is easy:

import os from django.conf.urls.defaults import patterns from django.http import HttpResponse filepath, extension = os.path.splitext(__file__) ROOT_URLCONF = os.path.basename(filepath) DEBUG=TEMPLATE_DEBUG=True TEMPLATE_DIRS = (os.path.dirname(filepath),) from django.views.generic.simple import direct_to_template def yoohoo(request): return HttpResponse('Yoohoo!') urlpatterns = patterns('', (r'^hello/$', yoohoo), (r'^howdy/$', direct_to_template, dict( template='howdy.html', extra_context=dict( name='Stranger', ), )), )

In this extended example, we’ve added the URL your.server.com/howdy/ to our urlpatterns variable, but instead of pointing it to a previously defined view such as yoohoo , we’re pointing it to a built-in Django view called direct_to_template . This view accepts a few additional parameters such as the template file used to render the HTML page and a dictionary of variables that should be available inside the template, in our case name .

We’ve also activated debugging, which makes Django display more user-friendly messages in the browser when an error occurrs.

The template could be something as simple as this or as complex as your wildest Dreamweaver fantasies:

<!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head> <title> Hi, {{ name }}! </title> </head> <body> <h1> Hi, {{ name }}! </h1> <p> My time is <strong>{% now "H:i:s" %}</strong> </p> </body> </html>

This now looks less like a toy and more like something you could actually use to build something useful. We could add decorators à la Bottle or Flask to decorate views with their URLs instead of writing them separately at the bottom, and we could define a nicer syntax to point URLs to templates, but the basics are there and can do much of what Flask does. The difference is, the whole remaining paraphernalia of Django is hidden behind the curtains, ready for you to use it if or when you decide that you need to use an ORM to talk to a database, use Form helpers, build an administrative back-end, internationalize your webapp, etc.