d1am0ndt1ara:

sugarpuss-manslayer:

d1am0ndt1ara: sugarpuss-manslayer: Gotta love the whole Men Get Raped Too™ spiel. Ever seen a 12 year-old boy being accused of seducing the pedophile(s) that raped him? Yeah, me neither. Happens to girls all the time, though. And how does the fact that men get raped by other men disprove the fact that men are rapists? *blink* Lulz. Gotta love MRA logic. Fucking crackpots. Lol, exactly, but they always change the subject to female-on-male crime. AS IF that shit even exists. I don’t even know how I’d go about raping a dude. First, he’d have to get it up, and well, if he’s up, it sure as hell aint rape. haha!

“Rape by envelopment” is a fucking joke, figuratively and literally. Leaving aside the definition of rape as forced penetration as opposed to forced envelopment, I can see it being physically possible in some instances — for example, if you strapped the guy down and injected him with Viagra. But how often would women be that motivated to have intercourse with unwilling men? Intercourse isn’t that great for us, and even the women who can (supposedly) have orgasms from intercourse alone have to risk more than men do in the process. And for the “rape is abut power, not sex” camp (I think it’s about both), power-hungry women usually don’t express dominance in terms of overt, hand-to-hand aggression against men — let alone sexual humiliation of men by “enveloping” them. Penetration (which, of course, is still occurring when a woman is “raping a man by envelopment”) is considered an act of dominance. At least, most men talk about it in those terms amongst themselves even if women often have more romantic notions about PIV. So it would be hard to make a man feel humiliated and degraded by enveloping him/forcing him to penetrate you. If anything, men would be more likely to interpret the “rapist-by-envelopment” as a whore/slut/nymphomaniac (therefore seeing the act as degrading to her).