Yurizhai: Yurizhai: So what purpose did CCEDK have in fraudulent open source voting? Should we be worried about this?

It’s unclear at this point if it was a manual configuration error or an action with malicious intent. As I understand it, funds were requested to be withdrawn from CCEDK as a precautionary measure in the event the duplicate open-source voting was intentional.

As far as open-source goes though, we’re lucky that shareholders voted over 70% in favor of it even after the duplicates were removed. There’s no controversy that the majority of shareholders are in favor of it.