0 Shares 0



0

0







If the world wishes to avoid another power vacuum like what has occurred in Iraq following the U.S. withdrawal, it needs a legitimate government in Syria (at very least an interim one) to keep things from falling apart in the aftermath of this war.

Sadly, the world has sat on its hands for too long, and the options for finding a resolution to this conflict are as ugly as ever. Unless a strong international military presence exists within the country for over 10 years after the 'end' of this mutated war, it will require the current government to play a crucial role. Mending bridges and restoring a long-term peace are the biggest obstacles in this conflict, and no side has options at this point thatwon'tbe painful.

A no-fly zone would be a declaration of war which would escalate to a nuclear conclusion, make no mistake, this is very serious, not that you'd know it with our complicit media. The sabre rattling with Russia and Putin is sheer insanity, beyond ludicrous, the kind of slugging match hyped by no-nothing politicians on both the liberal and conservative stripe, in order to look like tough guys.

Imagine, for example, if Russia tried to enforce a no-fly zone over Yemen to stop Saudi atrocities, when American tankers are in the air refuelling the Saudi jets; imagine how it would escalate if the Russians shot down Saudi and American planes in order to "stop the carnage." That would be the equivalent action, wouldn't it?

If you wanted a massive regional war to break out, likely involving a Saudi-Iranian conflict that would shut down all shipping in the Persian Gulf that's what you'd promote - and trying it over Syria is just as insane.

It is high time we think about the consequences of such reckless actions before promoting them, not after.

Make no mistake about it, if Clinton gets elected she will impose a no-fly zone. Not for humanitarian reasons, of course, but to save the American "Islamist" proxies, and prevent Assad from winning this war and restoring peace. And then it won't be long until she finds a pretext for full on air strikes against the legitimate Syrian government. Don't expect our 'free media' to do their job properly either - they'll simply go along with the war narrative, prey on the public's moral sympathies and negate any critical thought or analysis in order to justify intervention.

Expect the propaganda to be ramped up either further. And just like in Libya she'll then leave the country in a complete mess, ISIS and Nusra will hold larger swathes of the country with no effective unified army to fight them, they'll be mass genocide, an even bigger refugee crisis, and even more terrorist attacks on our cities with people being killed because they're 'infidels'.

Then five years later they'll be another parliamentary 'inquiry' which will inevitably conclude that it was all based on unfounded intelligence, that the media only got their sources from groups and individuals that were partisan and simply wanted to oust Assad (e.g. White Helmets, Syrian Observatory) - again just like in Libya.

The Syrian government of Assad supports a relative secular regime and lifestyle while Saudi Arabia supports a scarily conservative and Wahhabi world view. The rebels supported by the Saudi Arabian government are Wahhabi extremists. In this fight, UK and US forces are supporting the side of Wahhabi extremism against a secular state for financial gain from Saudi Arabia.

A no-fly zone over Aleppo will be a desperate measure by the West to prop up murderous mercenaries who are terrorising the civilians.

Poking the Russian bear is simply not the answer.