Eric Striker

Daily Stormer

November 2, 2016

A lot of rubes get worried about “Sharia Law” taking over the USA, but if you actually take a look at how the American legal system works, you will notice the underlying principle of the Talmud – that Gentiles who offend a Jew or his property must be punished radically out of proportion to their crime – hangs in the air of every courtroom where the dynamic of Jew vs non-Jew is in play.

In this case, we have the conviction of a 24-year-old Indian man, who along with his Italian co-defendant, threw a Molotov Cocktail at New Jersey Synagogues in 2011, one which blackened the door, and another which burned a hole in a Jews rug. Nobody was hurt in any of these attack, and it barely charred the property, but they were hit with, and recently convicted of, charges that will leave you aghast. Somehow, a (((Bergen County))) jury thought it appropriate to convict them of a post-9/11 terrorism law that carries a minimum of 30 years to life in prison.

Here is the flagrantly dishonest Jewish account of the crime.

Times of Israel:

On Tuesday afternoon, a jury in Hackensack found Aakash Dalal guilty of 17 counts, including terrorism charges, for his role in masterminding the attacks on Bergen County synagogues in December 2011 and January 2012. The attacks began with graffiti on Temple Beth Israel in Maywood. That could have been dismissed as a rash act, but when there were more attacks at different synagogues, culminating in the actual throwing of Molotov cocktails at Congregation Beth El in Rutherford, the situation grew frightening. Public officials responded reassuringly. Police stepped up patrols in towns throughout the county, and the Bergen County Prosecutors Office made the investigation a top priority. Before long, detective work fingered Anthony Graziano as the man who bought the ingredients for the Rutherford bombs [IE, Gasoline and an empty glass bottle–Eric Striker]. And then other clues — including a mysterious message left as a comment on the Jewish Standard’s website — fingered Dalal as a co-conspirator and partner in some of the crimes. In May, in a separate trial, Graziano was convicted of terrorism and other charges. In Dalal’s trial, prosecutors brought in text messages proving that he egged on Graziano, promising that he could be “fuhrer” some day. The two of them, the trial showed, gloated, as the Jewish community held solidarity evenings with the attacked synagogues. The guilty verdict showed that Dalal’s attorneys efforts to minimize his responsibility failed to convince the jury. And it showed that Dalal sought to incite fear in more than five people, as the state’s post-9/11 terrorism statute required. The verdict showed, importantly but not surprisingly, that we are blessed to be in a place where crimes against our community are prosecuted seriously. Dalal’s fate, like Graziano’s, will be decided at sentencing. They face life in prison.



Here is a summary of the laundry list of trumped up charges Graziano and Dalal were hit with.

Asbury Park Press:

He was found not guilty of conspiracy to commit arson at K’Hal Adath Jeshurun Temple where worshipers on Jan. 3, 2012 found singed siding after investigating an odor that turned out to be from the fuel in smashed Molotov cocktails that failed to do significant damage to the building. Yet, Dalal was found guilty of arson, bias intimidation, possession of a weapon and possession of a destructive device for the incident at the same synagogue on Arnot Place in Paramus. Dalal was also convicted of conspiracy to commit arson, attempted arson, bias intimidation, possession of a weapon and possession of a destructive device for a failed arson attempt at the Jewish Community Center in Paramus on Jan. 7, 2012. At the time, Dalal was campaigning for Ron Paul in New England and Graziano went alone to the scene, but was scared off by a police officer who made a routine patrol through the JCC’s parking lot. Jurors also found Dalal guilty for conspiracy to commit arson, arson, bias intimidation, possession of a weapon and possession of a destructive device in the Rutherford firebombing of Temple Beth El on Montross Avenue. Rabbi Neil Schuman testified that he awoke to find his bed, carpet and window on fire at about 4 a.m. on Jan. 11, 2012. His then-wife, five children, father and mother-in-law were also asleep in the residence, which is adjacent to the synagogue. The terrorism charge for which Dalal was convicted, relating to the Rutherford incident, is the most serious charge and carries a sentence of 30 years to life in prison.

The spirit of the law against possessing a destructive device is meant to cover actual explosives, like say, a U-Haul truck full of ANFO as used in the Oklahoma City bombing. While you can technically stretch the definition to include a Molotov Cocktail under the current federal statue, any time you do stretch it you have ulterior motives, like using the legal system to make a political or racial statement – inappropriate in a courtroom context (on paper, at least).

The only damage reported at these Synagogue attacks were slightly singed doors and burned marks on carpets. The “bias intimidation” was spray-painting “Jews Did 9/11,” and a very poorly drawn Swastika the Jews probably drew themselves afterwards the next day.

But none of this compares to the ludicrous abuse of the post-9/11 federal terrorism laws. Rabbi Neil Schuman at the Rutherford synagogue claims his entire extended family (mother in law, wife, kids, etc) was coincidentally sleeping in the very room above the Synagogue (no evidence the two defendants were targeting them or knew they were in there, or else they would’ve been hit with attempted murder judging from how this case was prosecuted), which is how they were able to gin up the terrorism charge.

As to the extent of the “terrorist attack” according to Schuman’s testimony, it was a small fire on the window and rug he was able to quickly put out with a comforter.

NJ.com:

“They were trying to kill me and my family,” Schuman said during testimony, according to the report. Schuman told the court he used a comforter to snuff out flames from his bed, rug and window, according to the report.

Where is the evidence his family was in that room? There is none, only a Jew’s word, which is less than nothing.

But here is one interesting caveat. One year after Jews at Temple Beth El framed the misdemeanor by some kids as an act of international terrorism, they were given a grant from the Department of Homeland Security federal racket. Jews get a mind-blowing 94% of all Homeland Security grants to renovate their Jews-only recreational centers on your dime, Goyim.



North Jersey Record:

Congregation Beth El synagogue was awarded a $30,000 Homeland Security grant to enhance security since the rabbi’s home, located in the same building as the synagogue, was the target of an attempted firebombing on Jan. 11. The attack was one of several bias attacks planned and/or undertaken on Jewish landmarks in the North Jersey area in December and January. The incidents put law enforcement on high alert and communities in Paramus, Rutherford and Maywood on edge, officials said.

In the end, two young men with no criminal record of note will spend decades, if not the rest of their lives, in prison, for the crime of ruining some Jew’s carpet.

Would a Jew face life in prison if he burned a hole in your rug and spray painted “White People Did 9/11”?

No.

And that’s Talmudic Law in a nutshell.