Trump admin opposed bill punishing Turkey for purchasing S-400, leaked memo shows

Trump administration opposed a bill that would sanction Turkey for its purchase of Russian S-400 missile defense systems, arguing that the legislation would “effectively terminate U.S.-Turkey defense trade,” a seven-page memo obtained by The Daily Beast showed. The bill would “treat Turkey as a pariah in NATO, feeding a narrative that the Russian Federation would likely seek to amplify and exploit,” the administration said.

US President Donald Trump.

Duvar English

The administration of U.S. President Donald Trump opposed a bill that would punish Turkey over its purchase of Russian S-400 missile defense systems, a leaked memo shows, saying that it would drive NATO ally Turkey towards Russia further.

According to the seven-page document obtained by The Daily Beast, Trump administration opposed a provision in the bill that would help Syrian Kurdish refugees immigrate to the United States.

The memo was sent by the State Department to Capitol Hill ahead of the Senate mark-up of a bill co-sponsored by Sens. Jim Risch and Bob Menendez titled “Promoting American National Security and Preventing the Resurgence of ISIS Act.”

That legislation, which passed out of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee despite Trump administration’s opposition, would sanction Turkey for buying Russian surface-to-air missiles and would bar the U.S. from selling Turkey F-16 or F-35 fighter jets, including parts, until the country has fully abandoned the S-400s.

The “Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act” (CAATSA) mandated sanctions on countries that make major new purchases of Russian weapons. But despite the fact that Turkey’s deal with Russia fits the bill, the administration hasn’t imposed sanctions—enraging members of Congress on both sides of the aisle.

‘Effectively terminate US-Turkey defense trade’

In the seven-page description of the Trump administration’s views, the administration detailed a host of problems with the legislation. The administration argued that the legislation would “effectively terminate U.S.-Turkey defense trade,” which would increase Turkey’s reliance on Russia or “other adversary arms providers” for weapons.

The bill would also “treat Turkey as a pariah in NATO, feeding a narrative that the Russian Federation would likely seek to amplify and exploit.”

A State Department spokesperson said the U.S. government wants to keep the NATO relationship strong.

“NATO is stronger with Turkey as a member, and has been for nearly 70 years,” the spokesperson said.

“Turkey has been a significant contributor to NATO collective security for decades. One of Russia’s key strategic goals is to drive a wedge between NATO members; we are working to maintain strong cooperation within the Alliance. We remain deeply concerned with Turkey’s acquisition of the Russian S-400 missile system, and stress the S-400 and F-35 cannot coexist. We will continue to urge Turkey to ensure its defense investments adhere to the commitment all Allies made to pursue NATO interoperability.”

‘Administration’s approach to refugees is clear’

The document also said the administration opposes a provision of the bill that would help Kurdish allies come to the U.S. as refugees more quickly.

“The President has been clear on this Administration’s approach to refugees as reflected in the National Security Strategy of the United States,” the document says.

The State Department document also raises concerns about a provision of the bill that would give Kurds access to Special Immigrant Visas—normally used to authorize travel to the U.S. for Iraqi and Afghan translators who faced retaliation because they helped American soldiers. According to the letter, the nine-month processing time for those visas is too short “to accommodate vital national security screening.”

‘Sanctions on Halkbank are unnecessary’

The Senate bill also includes sanctions against Halkbank, a Turkish bank accused of participating in a multi-billion-dollar sanctions-evasion operation on behalf of the Iranian government.

Though the Trump administration already has the authority to level sanctions against Halkbank, it hasn’t done so—perplexing many observers of Trump’s Iran policy. The Justice Department, however, has charged Halkbank with helping Iran illegally access billions of dollars. And the chief of the DOJ’s National Security Division, John Demers, called it “one of the most serious Iran sanctions violations we have seen.”

In just about every other instance, the Trump administration has taken an aggressive approach to enforcing Iran sanctions and targeting Tehran. The administration even declared Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps to be a terrorist group earlier this year, which fed into acute tensions simmering in the Gulf.

The president’s personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani has done legal work for Reza Zarrab, a gold trader who pleaded guilty to participating in the sanctions-dodging scheme that allegedly involved Halkbank. Giuliani worked hard to keep Zarrab from having to make that plea; he reportedly pushed the Trump administration to send Zarrab back to Turkey as part of a prisoner swap. The bid failed and Zarrab’s testimony about the sanctions-evasion scheme proved valuable to prosecutors.

The Trump administration’s comments to Congress only gave boilerplate language opposing Congressional sanctions on the controversial bank.

“[T]he sanctions on Halkbank are unnecessary because the Department of Treasury already possesses the authority to designate Halkbank, if appropriate,” the document said.

“Purporting to require the President to impose sanctions on Halkbank, constrains the President’s authority to conduct foreign relations.”