Innocent victims of the FBI's quack science were sentenced to death

FACT: The FBI runs the majority of America's domestic terror plots

Fake terror plots and faked evidence... what else is the FBI faking?

How many innocent people have been persecuted by fraudulent science?

(NaturalNews) The FBI engaged in a massive science-based conspiracy to alter and distort forensic evidence for over two decades, the agency has now publicly admitted. "The Justice Department and FBI have formally acknowledged that nearly every examiner in an elite FBI forensic unit gave flawed testimony in almost all trials in which they offered evidence against criminal defendants over more than a two-decade period before 2000," reports the Washington Post in a rare moment of truth-telling.Astonishingly, 93% of the forensic scientists in the FBI's hair analysis unit "overstated forensic matches in ways that favored prosecutors in more than 95 percent of the 268 trials reviewed so far," reports WashPost. To pull this off, they used "scientific jargon" to bamboozle juries, making their evidence sound convincing even though it was entirely invalid. As usual, this science-based fabrication of false evidence was offered by egotistical, self-assured FBI scientists who sounded convincing even though they were misleading the court with false testimony.As The Guardian reports about one particularly disturbing trial:Thirty-two cases now under review involved defendants who were given the death penalty. There is little question that the FBI's faked hair analysis "science" has resulted in people being sentenced to death who were completely innocent.The FBI, just like Monsanto and Merck, usedAll this only emerged after the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) investigated the matter in cooperation with the Innocence Project . A total of 342 cases were reviewed for possible problems, and of those in which hair evidence was used against defendants in trials,that isn't supported by the facts.As The Guardian writes:What this means, essentially, is that virtually the entire FBI forensics team just "made $#!# up" to achieve convictions. And why wouldn't they? After all, the FBI is the same agency that also plots its own domestic terror hoaxes, recruits people to carry them out, stops them at the last minute and then claims it's "preventing domestic terrorism."Yes,. For the scoop on all that, check out these stories:New York Times openly admits domestic terror plots masterminded by the FBIFBI halts terror plot dreamed up by the FBI, then claims victory against terrorismThe FBI is amazingly good at halting terror plots dreamed up by the FBIFBI 'entrapment' tactics questioned in web of phony terror plots and paid informantsFBI intercepts its own terrorist plot against US Capitol, PentagonUpon learning how the FBI faked hair analysis "science" and faked domestic terror plots in order to halt them, a reasonable person can't help but ask the obvious question: "What else is the FBI faking?"Is the FBI arresting and prosecuting completely innocent people who have done nothing wrong at all? Almost certainly so.Did the FBI intentionally train its forensic scientists to lie on the witness stand in order to achieve more convictions against innocent people? Without a doubt. That has now been openly admitted in the hair analysis fiasco.Does the FBI have the power to arrest, prosecute and even have executed a completely innocent individual? Without a doubt. They do.On the other hand, the FBI also. The agency also investigates and successfully prosecutes many white-collar criminals engaged in elaborate financial fraud schemes, extortion, kidnapping and so on. No one doubts the FBI achieves some important victories against real criminals, but the question must now be asked, "At what cost to the innocent?"How many innocent people are rotting in prison today for every truly guilty person the FBI arrested and prosecuted?And what else has the FBI gotten wrong in its forensic "science" department? If the FBI's own top forensic scientists were gullible and arrogant enough to believe that a single strand of hair can identify a single person like a fingerprint, then they don't sound very intelligent and "scientific" in the first place.Do these people even know how to run and interpret genetic samples? Chemical samples? Biological samples? The competence of the entire operation must now be called into question, because if these people are so bad at science that they got the hair analysis question completely wrong, then surely they are also capable of failing in other areas of forensic analysis.It pains me to realize just how many innocent people have been persecuted over the years by fraudulent science. The arrogance of those pushing the certainty of "SCIENCE!" has always amazed me. Somehow, once people are trained in some small branch of science,Many people even ridiculously believe that science itself is incapable of producing errors. (They clearly don't understand how science really works.) Members of the general public -- most of whom are scientifically illiterate -- can easily be hoodwinked by an arrogant, seemingly self-confident science-based bamboozler. Just look at how the media is so easily tricked into supporting toxic vaccines that provably brain damage children in alarming numbers Scientific arrogance is a dangerous thing in any context: the FBI, the American Medical Association, medical journals, the American Dental Association and so on. Any time someone waves the banner of science and declares they have the exclusive monopoly on knowledge that no one else is capable of understanding,. They're about to pull a fast one on you that might get you injured, killed, or even sentenced to death."As the scientific basis of hair analysis has crumbled, the scale of the judicial catastrophe caused by the FBI's enthusiastic use of it for decades until about 2000 has now begun to emerge more fully," reports The Guardian.In a world where even the FBI fails to grasp the limits and faults of its own forensic science, no one is truly safe because the FBI simultaneously has the power toand even have you killed by the state. The question in my mind right now is, "Why aren't those former FBI forensic scientists being arrested and tried for committing fraud?"