Investment Banks as Corporate Monitors in the Early 20th Century United States

NBER Working Paper No. 20544

Issued in October 2014

NBER Program(s):Corporate Finance, Development of the American Economy, Law and Economics



We use the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914 to study the effect of bankers on corporate boards in facilitating access to external finance. In the early twentieth century, securities underwriters commonly held directorships with American corporations; this was especially true for railroads, which were the largest enterprises of the era. Section 10 of the Clayton Act prohibited investment bankers from serving on the boards of railroads for which they underwrote securities. Following the implementation of Section 10 in 1921, we find that railroads that had maintained strong affiliations with their underwriters saw declines in their valuations, investment rates and leverage ratios, and increases in their costs of external funds. We perform falsification tests using data for industrial corporations, which were not subject to the prohibitions of Section 10, and find no differential effect of relationships with underwriters on these firms following 1921. Our results are consistent with the predictions of a simple model of underwriters on corporate boards acting as delegated monitors. Our findings also highlight the potential risks of unintended consequences from financial regulations.

A non-technical summary of this paper is available in the February 2015 NBER Digest. You can sign up to receive the NBER Digest by email.



Acknowledgments

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w20544

Published: Frydman, Carola, and Eric Hilt. 2017. "Investment Banks as Corporate Monitors in the Early Twentieth Century United States." American Economic Review, 107 (7): 1938-70. DOI: 10.1257/aer.20150143

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these: