The British Secret Services gave Saudi Arabia and all its Trillions of dollars of Petroleum to the Satanic House of Saud after the first World War and the destruction of the Ottoman Empire.



This was done to obfuscate - as in the creation of stooge Rajas in British India - the fact that after the Second World War, behind the scenes in Saudi Arabia, Europe, India, China, USA, Australia, South Africa, Canada, Israel, Argentina, Brazil etc, it is really Britain with its band of Satanic Lords, who rule all these countries by proxy and, through Globalism and its New World Order, intend to conquer the World.



Saudi Arabia has been giving 400 million dollars annually for the creation of Wahhabist Mosques in every country of the World in order to create ISIS terrorism worldwide.

The Satanic element indicated by the raw eating of hearts and livers of prisoners, still beating after just being torn from their chests - cannibalism by ISIS leaders.

ISIS aids the SOROS Quantum creature employed by the CIA, NSA and Rothschild and his colour revolution hybrid warfare destabilisation of the Middle East, Russia and China as well as of Europe and USA to create police state control for the “protection” of the populaces.



Indeed the problem, reaction, solution dialectic is used by Illuminism to control society and dumb it down in this way.



Brunnell alleged that some within the Illuminati were so heartless as to believe that their socialist “World Order” must be brought about even if the orchestrating of wars, etc., had to be accomplished in order to create the conditions necessary for establishing it… or, in other words, that the end justified the means.



These lost souls were and are apparently convinced that they have the divine right to decide the fate of nations, and that the masses of humanity exist for no other reason than to serve their cause.



They consider themselves “gods” and the rest of humanity as “mere mortals”. So much for the end-result of the false promise that was given to man by the serpent race as revealed in Genesis chapter 3, which was that men could be as gods, and that the creature could be independent from or equal to the Creator.



Prince Philip of England of the Coberg Saxe Gotha clan, descended from Vlad the Impaler or Dracula of Transylvania, – Price Charles has a “Stake” in Transylvania and lives in Dracula’s Transylvania six months out of each year - has blood transfusions regularly from young children to make him live longer like many of the billionaire Globalist class.



Like Al “Gore” of the firm Blood and Gore who skims off the Carbon Tax scam keeps raw blood in his refrigerator.

The Bohemian Grove is a super ultra-elite club - including presidents of the united states - that practice bizarre Satanic Druid customs during the summer solstice in a Grove in the redwood forest above San Fransisco – when the SUN (Sol) appears to be at it’s highest point in the sky (one of the Earth’s hemispheres is at it’s maximum tilt towards the Sun), it creates the longest daytime of the year.

Then the Bohemian Grove emulate the ancient Satanic secret COSMIC mystery cults of Babylon, Rome, and Greece. The members secretly celebrate and sacrifice to the old Gods such as Moloch, Ishtar- CYBELE, Lilith, Attis, SUN Gods- Mithra-Mithras, and APOLLO (Sol Invictus- Unconquered SUN)

Bohemian Grove with the "Cremation of Care" Ritual where they sacrifice a child, killing it and burning it - they say they pretend to - beneath a 40ft stone statue of an owl symbolizing Minerva and thus Cybele.

BOHEMIAN GROVE



Prince Philip of Britain once asked ICL - International Computers Ltd. - for a secure operating system of 15 levels where you could see your level and the levels underneath you, but not the levels above.

This indeed is the way all Secret Societies work and like Russian dolls, one within the other, the secrets get more deep and more secret and that all the myths expounded by all the lower levels are lies and the highest level only tells the truth which explains all the other levels.



This final secret must be intense because only the highest psychopaths can implement it as they are Globally implementing it now….



THE LUCIFERIAN SPECIES are humans who have meditated and learned, perhaps many, many tens of thousands of years ago, how to cut off from god by using energy blockages to block chakras above the head so they can live outside the body in private universes made possible by draining the psychic energy of their human prey - so they seem like psychopathic aliens to us - then they download into their mind weakened sons - throwing their sons out - on their 21st birthday so as to become the Head of their Baron, Lord or Crown families and control their multi trillion dollar, thousands of years old families wealth, to manage the human herd.

By removing connection with their hearts and consciences they are thus less than human, a new Species looking like humans but in fact, psychopathic intra - human parasites.

Satanists use infil-traition to infect, take over and destroy each new civilisation using War and the false Satanic Economics of Adam Smith, Ricardo, Mills, Keynes and Von Hayek to create the destruction of infrastructure for of the, "Policy of Poverty" or Austerity to control the human herd for tens of thousands of years.

Because Luciferians live outside the body and only want to vampirise human spiritual energies in order to live forever, they will consider any solution to problems. Their Victim Satanists are their Psychopathic Infil-Traitor, Lives for Satan Destroyers of people, wealth, infrastructure, culture, goodness.. who are promised Eternal Life for their service - THEY LIE!!

THE SATANIC SPECIES ARE LOWER MANAGEMENT who are given money and power. They are, like all humanity, Victims of the Luciferians, taught to Ritually degenerate themselves and further and further degenerate themselves in order to maintain their energy which at every stage is vampiristically harvested by the Luciferian Watchtower elite who live outside the body.

BOHEMIAN GROVE

Our Oligarch Masters like Madame Bathory, Count Vlad the Impaler and Giles de Rais, have used Blood for thousands of years as part of their Rituals - see video above.

A picture of the Satanic ritual, The Cremation of Care - where United States Presidents, Politicians and their Oligarch Masters - "Grovers" - from the Eleusinian Mysteries and the Druids who all performed their Rituals in Groves - burn a baby on an Altar in font of a 40ft stone Owl (Dedicated to Minerva and thus Cybele - the State Religion of the Roman Empire) in front of a lake. Fake Gang Bohemian Grove Gaytriarchy WISE OLD OWLS including presidents of the USA plan on preying on the victim human race which cannot “see” in the darkness their propaganda and mind control creates so they can devour YOU!! The Satanist Grovers make “policy” between Luciferian rituals, romping around in the redwoods in togas.



Their attitude: “Hey nothing personal! You’ve heard of Satanic Darwinian “Survival of the fittest", haven’t you? We Owls can see in the dark, you can’t. Therefore we are entitled to EAT you! Right? Of course we’re right. And so it has been for thousands of years! And so we intend to keep it!” BOHEMIAN GROVE - THE GROVERS Congress: Union of Sacred Masculine and Sacred Feminine, The Dove, swallowed by Rothschilds and minions such as Morgans, Rockefellers etc. Their lodge member urban planner and his masters are telling you: Congress? Representative Democracy? Hah! Suckers, we OWN you and your congressman. Ha! - and they are saying that in broad daylight, which gives them a big charge of legitimacy and empowerment, for they are “illuminated” and you are in the dark.

I guess the education system isn't full proof indoctrinating your children into Bolshevik Communism....they need more weapons to more quickly dumb down humanity...vaccines are all set up to make the tribe over at the Rockefeller medical industrial complex $90 Billion a year....autism was practically unheard of until they started pumping babies with tainted vaccines to turn them into a bunch of handicapped chimps...



If you really think that my analysis is a form of softness or passivity then you really misread me and the purpose of this site. You probably know that it is a well-known problem with despots and dictators when the gradually surround themselves with only those kind of advisors who enthusiastically agree with everything the despot wants to hear and with everything the despot says.

Enemy Propaganda is like this.

My question to you is simple: do you want to turn into a “despotic reader” – somebody who will come to this site to hear his views supported, his ideas vindicated and his hopes affirmed? Or do you prefer to come here, get what I hope is an honest, if generally cautious, analysis which you can then either accept or reject?



My job is to try to present to you the truth as best as I can distinguish it - and see below the supporting evidence. Even when that truth is cautious or, worse, unpleasant.



Look, the intelligence process goes through what is called the “Four A's”: Acquisition, Analysis, Acceptance, Action. The first one is “getting the data/info”. The second one means making sense of it and presenting it to your “client” (in this case: all of you). The third one is always overlooked: acceptance by the “client” – i.e., the willingness to hear a negative or disappointing analysis. This is the part which YOU (collective “you”) must do (or refuse to do).

Last is action...

Breakfast at Owls Nest Camp, Bohemian Grove, July 23, 1967. Around the table, left to right: Preston Hotchkis, California Governor Ronald W. Reagan, Harvey Hancock (standing), Vice President Richard M. Nixon, Glenn Seaborg, Jack Sparks, (unidentified individual), (unidentified individual), and Edwin Pauley. Courtesy of Edward W. Carter (deceased). Lawrence Berkeley reporting on the Manhattan Project to create the Atomic bomb, lunching with future president Eisenhower and past president Hoover at Bohemian Grove, July 23, 1950.



The Elite, for 10,000 years, have used meditation and psychic powers as part of their mind control arsenal. Consciously, they have denigrated meditation in all normal, mind controlled, - non questioning - people, because the people who do not question are kind of dumb!!

Meditation is one of the powers which controls the World, therefore learn meditation!!

The actions I recommend are the avoidance of poison, and the active getting the poison out of the body, physically, emotionally, mentally, spiritually with Energy Enhancement Meditation Course either by Video or Live, with us. Deprogram, Become normal. Spread the plan.

THERE IS A PATH!!

WANT TO LEARN HOW TO REMOVE MIND CONTROLLING ENERGY BLOCKAGE IMPLANTS - MORE ABOUT ENERGY ENHANCEMENT MEDITATION? WANT TO LEARN WHY "TRADITIONAL MEDITATION TECHNIQUES ARE DESIGNED TO FAIL"? DOWNLOAD FREE ENERGY ENHANCEMENT E-BOOK!! DOWNLOAD NOW!! FREE MEDITATION EBOOK NAME: EMAIL: DOWNLOAD NOW!! THE EVOLUTION OF A NEW HUMANITY - 1. THE ENLIGHTENED SPECIES AND THE HUMAN INTRA SPECIES PARASITES 2. THE LUCIFERIAN SPECIES 3. THE SATANIC SPECIES Satanic ISIS, British 1706 Secret Agent Hempher created Salafism and Saudi Arabian Wahhabism ISIS - British/ Venetian Empire created Secret service created Wahhabism in 1706 - based on the same principles as Lutherism - and institutionalised it in MI6 created Saudi Arabia

THE LUCIFERIAN SATANIC RELIGION'S ROLE IN THE FALL OF CIVILISATIONS

- THE ROLE OF PAGAN SATANIC RITUAL HOMO-OCCULTISM IN LEADING THE FALL OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE AND THE DEGENERATION OF HITLERS GERMANY

One of the stories of Satanism in world history is also a story of the introduced Pagan element of Tantric Ritual Sex (with the Whore of Babylon) and Ritual Homosexual Anal Intercourse into any Religion - in a way, turning every Sacred Symbol upside down - thus the ability to turn any Religion into its perverted Satanic opposite. Whilst these satanic practises activate the Kundalini; because they are against the Will of the Soul, they also convert pure positive spiritual energy which has been stored to enable Enlightenment thus perverting and degenerating those who practise these rituals into psychopathic satanists, - which is their purpose. As well as altering the state of the involuntary nervous system, anal intercourse, according to traditional Satanic belief, results in the ejaculation of semen into the rectum, which nourishes the "Kundalini gland" much as the white of an egg feeds the fertilized yolk or embryo. The Satanic Left Hand Tantrist, sustaining his Shakti or Goddess with sexual intercourse anal or otherwise, facilitates the arousal of his/her internal fire. However the belief is a lie, as previously stated - Anal intercourse is a specific Satanic Left hand path of Kundalini arousal method which activates the Kundalini but the Satanic Tantric Initiate also injects a stream of Satanic Energy Blockages into the student - male or female - which perverts and eventually bestialises and psychopathises their mind. Sexual Congress with evil leads to evilisation as you absorb addiction implant energy blockages from evil people.. "Stay away from evil" Jesus Christ. Satanic Left Hand Tantric practices may be viewed by some as "degenerating", "perverted" or "deviating," and in terms of the inner meaning of words, they are. "Pervert" means "to overthrow the soul," "to turn around from the right hand path," while "deviate" (de and via, the way or path) suggests "off the road of the Path of the Soul," "out of the way." Not only does male or female sexual congress with any evil person cause degeneration but Anal intercourse is a specific Satanic Left hand path of Kundalini arousal method which activates the Kundalini but which also injects a stream of Satanic Energy Blockages into the student which perverts and eventually bestialises and psychopathises their mind, but this movement of the student away from the "Dharma" Soul Path also burns up specific energies already stored whose purpose is to aid the Enlightenment process of the student. This degeneration, this psychopathation, of the student and its movement into the perverting and degeneration of society, stopping the Evolution of Humanity as part of the, "Policy of Poverty" is the Purpose of the creation of the Satanic and Luciferian religions The Satanic Homosexual practice of Anal intercourse and of Ritual Sex (with the Whore of Babylon) whilst raising Kundalini also degenerates the student because the tantric or sodomiser is always connected with Demon Energy Blockages which he injects with every Satanic Initiation. White Kundalini activating Hatha Yoga practices as Mulabandha (anal sphincter lock), and Asvini Mudra (alternating relaxation and contraction of the anus) Yogic Flying, and white Kundalini activating Angelic - connected to goodness and the thousand years old Traditions of the ENLIGHTENED Spiritual Masters - Energy Enhancement practices of the Agnisar Kriya, Pranayama and the Energy Enhancement Meditative practises of the Kundalini Kriyas deepened by Alchemical VITRIOL and the Kundalini Key which do not pervert and degenerate, which connect you to the Energies of the Universe itself instead allowing you to increase the storage within you of pure positive spiritual energy, thus accelerating - Speeding Up!!- the true path of Enlightenment.

The Satanic Homosexual practice of Anal intercourse and of Ritual Sex (with the Whore of Babylon) is the Dark Tantric equivalent of such White Kundalini activating Hatha Yoga practices, Maharishi Yogic Flying and white Kundalini activating Energy Enhancement practices of the Kundalini Kriyas deepened by Alchemical VITRIOL and the Kundalini Key which do not pervert and degenerate, instead they increase the pure positive spiritual energy stored, thus accelerating - Speeding Up!!- the true path of Enlightenment.

In a spiritual sense, Satanic Pederastic Sodomites have been illuminated or initiated into the illumination of Lucifer. The initiation into the light of Lucifer is achieved by sodomy of the three year old. However, if that person does not follow through, he can become a dud -- he doesn’t go anywhere, so he hasn’t really risen to any rank within the movement of the body of the Illuminati. They have certain degrees associated with being a high-level Illuminati -- you wouldn’t get there simply by being initiated as a three year old. The initiation of the three year old is the beginning requirement of someday rising up into the ranks of a group that is considered to be the Illuminati. A lot of people think of the Illuminati as being a political group of people, but in another sense it’s a brotherhood of sodomites that’s like family.

Satanism infiltrates and takes over every genuine religion, it takes the symbols of that religion, turns them upside down and uses them in its own rituals. Satanism takes the philosophy and symbols of every religion, inverts it and thus perverts that philosophy.

By Satanic occult, we mean the perversion of formalized religious expression of pagan culture using, for example, the philosophical ideas - Homosexuality and Paedophilia - of Hellenic paganism.

In Sexual Experience Between Men and Boys, homosexualist historian Parker Rossman writes, In Central Europe...there was another effort to revive the Greek ideal of pedagogic pederasty, in the movement of Wandering Youth [Wandervoegel]. Modern gay homosexuality also can trace some of its roots to that movement of men and boys who wandered around the countryside, hiking and singing hand-in-hand, enjoying nature, life together, and their sexuality. Ultimately Satanic Hitler used and transformed the movement — much as the Romans had abused the paiderastia of the ancient Greeks — expanding and building upon its romanticism as a basis for the Nazi Party (Rossman:103).

SATANIC BLOOD RITUAL SACRIFICE

In, "The occult Roots of Nazism", historian Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke identifies the roots of Satanic occultism in western history: Satanic occultism has its basis in a perverted religious way of thinking, the roots of which stretch back into antiquity....Its principal ingredients have been identified as the satanic perversion of Gnosticism, the Hermetic treatises on alchemy and magic [rooted in Satanic Gnosticism], Neo-Platonism, and the Cabbala.... Real Gnosticism properly refers to the beliefs of certain heretical sects among the early Christians that possessed Gnosis, or the connection of man with the chakras above the head and thus with God.... The Gnostic sects disappeared in the fourth century, but their ideas inspired the dualistic Satanic Manichaean religion of the second century (Goodrick- Clarke:17) Since occultism is associated primarily with Satanic Gnosticism, the association of the Satanic Gnostics with homosexuality and with the Ritual homosexuality of the Dog - Priest is of primary relevance to this study. Thus we found an obscure reference to Hitler as a Manichaean in Steven Katz’s The Holocaust in Historical Context, Volume 1, of interest. Arthur Evans’ Witchcraft and the Gay Counterculture provides some illumination here. Mani, for whom Manichaeism is named, was a third century Prince of Satanic Babylon who devised his own form of Gnosticism. Satanic Manichean Gnostics blended pagan sex rituals and Gaia Cybele Mother Goddess worship with elements of New Testament Christianity and “rejected Jehovah God as an evil demon.” Manichaeism imposed on Gnosticism a caste system of leaders (elect) and followers (hearers). A Manichaean sect called the Bogomils (later called the Cathars) arose in Bulgaria and spread across Europe. Homosexuality became so closely associated with these Bulgarian heretics that the practice be came known as “buggery.” Indeed, “the word for Cathar in most European languages came to be the word for homosexual: in German, Ketzer, in Italian, Gazarro, and in French, Herite....Heresy and homosexuality became so interchangeable that those accused of heresy attempted to prove their innocence by claiming heterosexuality” (Evans:51ff). We probably all take for granted the fact that to day our modern world culture is dominated by the religions based on the Mosaic law (i.e. Judaism, Christianity and Islam). In their orthodox forms each of these religions regards homosexuality as an abomination because of their knowledge that Pagan Sex Rituals always turn Satanic.. But pagan cultures have no such prohibition. (By definition, pagans are people who are not Jews, Christians or Moslems). In pagan cultures, homosexuals as a group often hold an elevated position in religion and society because the dark Satanic practices of Anal Sex artificially raise Kundalini and give psychic powers. When pagan civilizations ruled the world, homosexuality and pederasty were widely practiced and accepted. The Satanic Perversion of all Ancient Religion, spanning all continents is written about by Homosexualist author Judy Grahn who writes, "Many aspects of shamanism had homosexual content, and many of the gods, spirits, and divinities of the world have been associated with Gayness. In Tahiti there were special divinities for homosexual worship. The ancient Shinto temples of Japan display scenes of sexual ritual orgies similar to those of the Bacchanalia of the Romans... the Great Mother Goddess of ancient China, Kwan - Yin, was worshiped with sexual rites that included homosexuality. When the Spanish conquistadores reached Central America and the Yucatan, they found a prevalence of Gay priests and sacred statues and stone sculpture depicting the homosexual union as a sacred act. In the Yucatan the god Chin is said to have established sacred homosexuality and a Gay priesthood serving in the temples just as was true of the temples of ancient Babylon and Sumeria" (Grahn:129). Romosexual... Christian writer George Grant concurs. He writes that “Rome was a perpetual satyricon. Egypt, Persia, Carthage, Babylon, and Assyria were all steeped in the pederastic tradition. And the ancient empires of the Mongols, Tartars, Huns, Teutons, Celts, Incas, Aztecs, Mayans, Nubians, Mings, Canaanites, and Zulus likewise celebrated depravity, degradation and debauchery” (Grant, 1993:24). In Sexuality and Homosexuality, historian Arno Karlen writes of homosexual cults through out the ancient world: The Egyptian, Dog Priests or "male temple prostitutes" —existed among the devotees of Ishtar and Astarte in Syria, the Albanians and Babylonians, the Canaanite neighbors of the ancient Hebrews, and in Cos, Crete and Ephesus in the Greek world” (Karlen:6). The ancient religion of Baal, familiar to students of the Bible as the set of beliefs and practices which so often corrupted Hebrew society in history, was one such cult. Worshippers of Baal “‘built for them selves high places and pillars, and Asherim (phallic poles used to honor the goddess of fertility) on every high hill and under every green tree; and there were also male cult prostitutes in the land’” (quotation from 1 Kings 14 in Karlen:9). Reference to these practices is found in several places in the Bible, notably Deuteronomy 23:17-18: “There shall be no ritual harlot - Crowley's "Whore of Babylon" - of the daughters of Israel, or a perverted one of the sons of Israel. You shall not bring the wages of a harlot or the price of a dog priest [male prostitute] to the house of the LORD your God for any vowed offering, for both of these are an abomination to the LORD your God” (NKJ). The Baal cult survived into Roman times and figured prominently in the infamous debaucheries of the Roman emperors in the first centuries after Christ. Karlen writes, It was in association with such cults that emperors’ deviance be came most flagrant. Just reading the Bible you can come across stories such as the Daughters of Lot - of Sodom and Gomorrah - sleeping with their father so they could have children. The first daughter founded the Moabites and the second daughter founded the Caananites. The story of Ruth who was born a Moabite and who married into Judaism who renounced the Moabite practise of the human sacrifice of Babies to Molech. Fourteen out of the last fifteen Roman Emperors were homosexual. Commodus, who took the throne in AD180, appeared in public dressed as a woman and was strangled by a catamitic [homosexual] favorite; Hadrian deified his homosexual lover Antious. But neither matched Implanted Sexually and addicted with the Sexual addiction blockage, Roman Emperor Elegabalus, who began his rule at the age of fourteen in AD218, after having been raised in Syria as a priest of Baal. He entered Rome amid Syrian priests and eunuchs, dressed in silks, his cheeks painted scarlet and his eyes made up. Various Roman historians say that he assembled the homosexuals of Rome and addressed them garbed as a boy prostitute; put on a wig and solicited at the door of a brothel; tried to get doctors to turn him into a woman; offered himself for buggery while playing the role of Venus in a court mime; kissed his male favorites’ genitals in public and, like Nero, formally married one of them... Elegabalus erected in Rome the great phallic asherim which the Hebrew kings had kept trying to purge from their land (Karlen:62).

Roman Emperor Heliogabalus in Homosexual Heaven

How does this occur? 'These crimes were committed on the unscrupulous initiative of few individuals, with the blessing of more, and amid the passive acquiescence of all" - TACITUS It is relevant to point out that this time period in the Roman empire can be considered the Christians’ Holocaust. In 64 A.D. Christians were blamed by Nero for the burning of Rome and were targeted for extermination. Many Christians suffered unimaginable tortures as entertainment for the sadistic homosexual emperors of Rome.

“Slaughter of the Prophets of Baal,” by Gustave Dore, Old Testament Bible illustration depicting the purging of the Baalist priests from Israel after their defeat in a contest with the Prophet Elijah.

Though Rome was less homosexually oriented than Greece, Roman society was nevertheless heavily influenced by homosexual and Satanic Human Sacrifice practices. Nero used to dress up as a vampire or as a wolf (the festival of Lupercallus) at his parties. He regularly used to rush up on a Slave Boy and rip out his throat with his teeth. In Homosexuality, the Torah and Grace, Dwight Pryor reports that 14 of the first 15 Roman emperors were homosexual. In The Construction of Homosexuality, historian David F. Greenberg writes that “Roman homosexual tastes were so taken for granted that when Antony asked Herod to send his younger brother-in-law Aristobulus to the Roman court, Herod refused be cause ‘he did not think it safe to send him... to the principal man of the Romans, that would abuse him in his amours’” (Greenberg:154f). While there are many differences between the treatment of Christians in Pagan Rome and Jews in Nazi Germany, the prominence of homosexuality among the chief perpetrators of both atrocities can not be ignored. As we seek to understand Nazism, it is important to remember that Judaism and its Christian and Islamic offshoots are fundamentally opposed to homosexuality. As we begin to grasp the relationship between homosexuality and satanic occult ritual on one hand, and between homosexuals and Nazism on the other, the hatred of the Nazis for Jews and Christians may be more easily explained. The Jews were the people responsible for the demise of pagan world domination. Their theology (especially in its Christian form) banished pagan practices, including homosexuality, to a hidden and often reviled sub culture. This is not to say that anti-Semitism is strictly a result of occult or homosexual influences. But at its very root there is a spiritual element to the Holocaust that suggests that it was, in some respects, vengeance against the people whose moral laws had relegated pagan sex-religions to obscurity and ignominy.

Yet, while Christianity, Judaism and Islam made great strides in limiting pagan practices, they were not eliminated. Under Judeo-Christian cultural pressure, surviving pagan beliefs and practices, including sexual perversion, were forced from public life, reemerging in secretive and mystical Satanic occultic societies.

READ MORE BELOW ON TANTRA AND HOMOSEXUALITY IN SATANIC RITUAL THE NAZIS

It is important to our study that we recognize that the Nazis - another failed Empire - were strongly influenced by pagan occult and Satanic beliefs and, additionally, that homosexuality is fundamental to many Satanic pagan belief systems. Also Drugs. Hitler was addicted to Methamphetamine. He specified that all the Army should be given Methamphetamine. As noted by Greenberg this is especially true in relation to “aristocratic warrior societies” (ibid.:111). Indeed, this was true even of the Greeks, whose homosexuality was forced upon them by the Dorian invaders of the twelfth century B.C. “Plutarch (Erotikus, 761 D) states: ‘it was chiefly warlike peoples like the Boeotians, Lacedemonians and Cretans, who were addicted to homosexuality’” (Flaceliere:64ff). Author Brian Pronger notes that even the ancient Egyptians exhibited this tendency; their warriors raped enemy soldiers after defeating them in battle (Pronger:138). It is also important to recognize that homosexual Satanic Occultism has remained a part of pagan cultures throughout the centuries to the present, even though the global predominance of the Judeo-Christian sexual ethic has limited its acceptance in most modern pagan societies such as China and Japan. When Jesuit missionaries arrived in sixteenth century China, for example, they found widespread pederasty (Spence:220) which they quickly moved to erase. And Rossman compares “the institutionalized pederasty of the privileged warrior class of medieval Japan’s pederastic military structure” to “Nazi society” (Rossman:23).

HOMOSEXUALITY IS THE BACKDOOR TO SATANISM. FOR SATANISM TO BECOME THE POLITICAL CONTROL METHOD, CHRISTIANITY AND JUDAISM MUST BE DESTROYED!!

Greenberg reports on dozens of mostly primitive modern pagan societies which practice ritual homosexuality, usually pederasty. These societies are found through out the world, in countries such as Brazil, New Guinea, Morocco, sub-Saharan Africa and Malaysia. Greenberg writes, In many societies, male homosexual relations are structured by age or generation: the older partner takes a role defined as active or masculine; the younger, a role defined as passive or female... The homosexual practices are justified by the belief that a boy will not mature [with out these attentions] (Green berg:26ff). Such modern societies are profiled in The Sambia, by anthropologist Gilbert Herdt, who studied homosexuality in primitive cultures. He writes that “ritual homosexuality has been reported by anthropologists in scattered areas around the world [revealing a]...pervasive link between ritual homosexuality and the warrior ethos.... We find these similar forms of warrior homosexuality in such diverse places as New Guinea, the Amazon, Ancient Greece, and historical Japan” (Herdt:203). The process of a boy’s homosexual initiation in these societies is horrific: he is deprived of sleep, starved, beaten and raped over several days until he is completely “resocialized” as a homosexual (ibid:179f). Thus homosexuality in paganism is not a relic of antiquity but an ongoing phenomenon. And the prevalence of homosexuals as occult leaders continues today. In the context of Western culture this may simply be because homosexuals gravitate to philosophies which oppose Judeo- Christian morality. But this would not explain the wide occurrence of homosexual rituals in primitive and pre-Christian pagan cultures. Homosexualist Laurence J. Rosan writes that “the priests of polytheistic or spirit religions...[are] expected to be ‘different’-- un worldly, even eccentric, given to visions, dramatic pronouncements and so on -- an ideal opportunity for both male and female homosexuals!” (Rosan:268f). The Bible, however, offers its own explanation, defining an individual’s homosexuality not as an incidental factor in pagan religion but, at least in some cases, as the consequence of “worshiping the creation rather than the Creator.” The Book of Romans, Chapter 1, Verses 18-27 reads as follows: For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and un righteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, because what may be known of God is manifest in them, for God has shown it to them. For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are with out excuse, be cause, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but be came futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened. Professing to be wise, they became fools, and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man — and birds and four footed animals and creeping things. Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness, in the lusts of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies among themselves, who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. Like wise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one an other, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due (NKJ). Ironically, the Biblical event which marks the beginning of homosexual practices in the post-flood world is the same one that is misinterpreted by pseudo-Christian white supremacists to justify their racial theories. Christian researcher Dwight Pryor gives the following interpretation (which we have summarized) of a familiar Biblical passage. In Genesis 9, Noah fell unconscious from drinking too much wine and while he was thus incapacitated Ham “saw [or uncovered] his nakedness.” This term, used primarily in the book of Leviticus, is a Hebraic euphemism for sexual intercourse. “And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done to him.” As a result of his sexual attack on his father, Ham is cursed by Noah. (In Call of the Torah Rabbi Elie Munk cites Hebrew scholars who also interprets Ham’s violation as “an act of pederasty”) - (Munk:220). Thus Ham be comes Canaan, for whom the land of Canaan is named. Some generations later the Canaanite cities of Sodom and Gomorrah would be destroyed by God be cause of homosexuality. White supremacists refer to Ham as the father of the colored races which they call “mud people.” But it is Satanic homosexual perversion, and child sacrifice (see the story of Ruth) not skin color, which is associated with the curse of Canaan.

“Noah Cursing Caanan,” by Gustave Dore.

THE NAZI HATRED OF JUDEO-CHRISTIAN ANTI-HOMOSEXUAL MORALITY



"HOMOSEXUALITY IS THE BACKDOOR TO SATANIC RITUAL"



We are not against Homosexuality, merely Against Satanic Ritual.

A common misperception held by present day Americans is that the Nazi campaign against the Jews was driven solely by racism. However, the Nazis were equally motivated by a vicious hatred of Biblical morality. In fact, the two were inseparable. Samuel Igra addressed this question in Germany’s National Vice.

Why should it be the Jews particularly that the German forces arrayed under Hitler want to exterminate?...What does this small people stand for which was accounted hateful and obnoxious to the Nazi rulers of Germany? Or, to put the question in another way, what is there in the Jewish traditional code of morals which induced Hitler to come forward as the protagonist of the German people against the Jews?....He was....the condottiere of a band of evil men who were united together by a common vice [homosexuality, whereas] Jewish national tradition for thousands of years has been actively opposed to this particular evil; because it is germinal vice, a virus that poisons the whole life-blood of human existence (Igra in Lively, The Poisoned Stream, p.13f) .



A widely circulated German publication by racial theorist Dietrich Hutton, titled Defilement of Race, helps to illuminate this point. It preached that Germany could only achieve its racial goals (and its destiny) by destroying Judeo-Christian morality.



Through the German soul and through unadulterated German blood, the world will be able to return to a state of health, but only after it has been freed from the curse of Judaism and of Christianity....The mission of German nationality in the world is to free this world of Jews and Christians....It is the very essence of Christianity...for all people to become “united in brotherhood.” To achieve this, all barriers of race must fall. The maintenance of such barriers means the preservation of national individuality, which is essentially irreconcilable with the Christian aim of universal brotherhood....Because this disintegration of racial culture has been consciously and systematically pursued by Christianity, and is still being pursued today, it is race defilement. (Hutton:3ff).



The Nazi regime viewed Judaism as the source of the problem but identified Christianity as the essential and willing tool by which the Jews sought to gain world domination. Hutton writes,

The way in which Christianity is directed in the interests of world Jewry and its attitude toward Judaism is traceable to the undeniable fact that the founders and proclaimers of the teachings of Jesus of Nazareth were full-blooded Jews....It cannot therefore be coincidence, or negligence or ignorance that consciously makes Christians...deviate from the fundamental tenets of conserving nationality and cultivating race. The reason for this is to defile non-Jewish races, weaken and destroy them so that Judaism, as the “chosen people,” can...[erect] a world sovereignty on the ruins of the non-Jewish races which Christianity has destroyed. (ibid:19).



Significantly, Hutton’s argument is not fundamentally an attack upon race, but upon theology. Both Jews and Christians are evil because of what they believe and how they thus organize their societies.



Why then did the Nazis maintained a murder campaign against all Jews but only against certain Christians? One factor was obviously political pragmatism since a sizable number of Germans identified themselves as Christians. But another factor was that, distinct from Christianity, the Jewish identity is ethnic as well as religious. The simple solution to the “Jewish problem,” therefore, was to scapegoat and kill all ethnic Jews (even those who had abandoned Biblical morality).



In contrast, Christianity was perceived by the Nazis as merely the theological puppet of Judaism; a tool to enslave the minds of otherwise rational people of every race. Thus, the Nazi approach to Christianity was a campaign of “reeducation” by advancing Nazi ideology through relentless propaganda, while simultaneously suppressing the opposing Christian view.



If we wish to create something new [writes Hutton] we cannot permit the existence and operation of disorganizing factors such as Christianity...we must overthrow and shatter all opposing and destructive forces --unsparingly and without compromise. Germanic blood and Christian baptismal water can never mix ” (ibid:15).



The Biblical Condemnation of Homosexuality



A brief review of the Judeo-Christian perspective of homosexuality is appropriate here to show why Nazi homosexuals reacted so harshly to it. We will see that homosexuality is condemned in every place in which it is mentioned; that all forms of homosexuality are equally condemned; and that homosexuality is always linked to personal and/or social destruction The primary passages addressing homosexuality in the Torah (1-3, 7a) and the Christian Bible (1-7) read as follows:



1) Sodom & Gomorrah, Genesis 19:19. [T]he men of Sodom...surrounded the house. And they called to Lot and said to him, ‘Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us that we may know them carnally.’...Then the angels said to Lot... ‘We will destroy this place, because the outcry against them has grown great...and the LORD has sent us to destroy it.’



2) The Curse on Sexual Perversion, Leviticus 18:22-30 You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an abomination. Nor shall you mate with any animal, to defile yourself with it...It is perversion...[F]or by all these the nations are defiled...therefore I visit the punishment of its iniquity upon it, and the land vomits out its inhabitants. You shall therefore keep My statutes and My judgments and shall not commit any of these abominations...I am the Lord your God.



3) The Benjamite Wars, Judges 19-21 [S]uddenly certain men of the city, perverted men, surrounded the house and beat on the door...saying, ‘Bring out the man who came to your house, that we may know him carnally!’...Then the tribes of Israel...[said] ‘What is this wickedness that has occurred among you? ‘Now therefore, deliver up...the perverted men who are in Gibeah...But the children of Benjamin would not listen to the voice of their brethren...Instead...[they] gathered together...to go to battle against the children of Israel.’



4) The Reprobate Mind, Romans 1:18-32 Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness, in the lusts of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies among themselves, who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen. For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due.



5) Homosexuals Must Repent To Go To Heaven, 1 Corinthians 6:9-11 Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you. But you were washed, but you were sanctified, in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.



6) The Reason God Destroyed Sodom, Jude 1:7 Sodom and Gomorrah...having given themselves over to sexual immorality and gone after strange flesh, are set forth as an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.

7) Regarding Homosexuality Generally, see also (a) Gen 2:24, 9:22, Deut 23:1, 1 Kings 14:24, 15:9-12, 22:46, 2 Kings 23:7, Job 36:14, (b) 1 Tim 1:9-10, Rev 22:15.



While today certain “gay theologians” misinterpret these passages to try and strip them of their proscriptive authority, these arguments were unknown to the Germans in the Nazi era. What was known, especially in faithful Jewish circles, was that the Torah (Old Testament) designates homosexuality as toeva, or abomination. This Hebrew word is in fact the severest term of opprobrium in the Bible. Used particularly in connection with homosexuality, toeva connotes a degree of moral perversion so heinous that (as cited above) the land will literally “vomit out” the nation which practices it (Rabbi Samuel Dresner: Private letter).



In light of this, Nazi hostility to Jews and Christians (especially those who remained true to their faith) is thus easier to understand. Yet even this insight does not fully explain the depth of Nazi hatred.



Towards the Final Solution



There is perhaps no more terrible expression in human speech than the “Final Solution.” In it is contained an evil so profound as not to be easily assimilated by the human mind. How could people be so filled with malice, we wonder, that they would seek to exterminate whole races of fellow human beings from the face of the earth? Only in a spiritual context can we truly understand the meaning of the “Final Solution,” the Holocaust of the Jews.

It is not surprising, then, that the roots of the Nazi evil are found in the neo-pagan revival of the late 1800s, which manifested itself in the glorification of occultism and the subversion of the Judeo-Christian foundations of German culture.



We have addressed many elements of the neo-pagan revival in previous chapters, but to find the specific roots of the Holocaust we must revisit the occult ideologue, Jorg Lanz von Liebenfels. Remember that Lanz, the homosexual male supremacist, was called “the man who gave Hitler his ideas,” by Austrian psychologist Wilhelm Daim. Anti-Semitic pamphlets by Lanz and Guido von List shaped Hitler’s early hatred of the Jews. It was Lanz who originated the concept of Himmler’s Lebensborn, the Aryan breeding colony. And it was Lanz, again, who can be seen behind Hitler’s answers to “the Jewish question.” Goodrick-Clarke writes,



The similarity between Lanz’s proposals...and the Nazi plans for the disposal of the Jews and the treatment of the enslaved Slav populations in the East [is unmistakable]. Lanz’s specific recommendations for the disposal of racial inferiors were various and included: deportation to Madagascar; enslavement; incineration as a sacrifice to God; and use as beasts of burden. Both the psychopathology of the Nazi Holocaust and the subjugation of non-Aryans in the East were presaged by Lanz’s grim speculations (Goodrick-Clarke:97).



We are all too familiar with the Nazi enslavement of “non-Aryans” and with their incineration of the Jews in the death camps, but these atrocities, though they agree perfectly with his ideas, do not by themselves prove any special influence by Lanz. In the Nazis’ “Madagascar Plan” (which was nothing more than a proposal to put all the Jews on the island of Madagascar), however, we find an indisputable connection to Lanz. In Harvest of Hate: The Nazi Program for the Destruction of the Jews of Europe, historian Leon Poliakov writes about the “Madagascar Plan,” but reveals that he was unaware of Lanz’s influence:



Goering had mentioned the “Madagascar Question” during the...meeting of November 12, 1938.

Himmler had been dreaming of it since 1934, as one witness testified. Putting all the Jews on a large island — moreover, a French island — would satisfy the Nazi love of symbolism. At any rate, the idea was put forth by the Minister of Foreign Affairs...[and] was accepted by Himmler as well as by the Fuehrer himself. Great inventions always have several originators; other more or less famous dignitaries can claim the honor of fathering this “philanthropic solution.” For example, Philip Bouhler, Chief of the Fuehrer’s personal chancellery...hoped to become the governor of the island (Poliakov:43).



Guido von List directed his hatred more specifically against Christians, and developed an elaborate mythology to justify attacks against Christianity. Goodrick-Clarke explains List's ideas:



[List developed] a conspiracy theory that identified Christianity as the negative and destructive principle in the history of the Ario-Germanic race. If it could be shown that Christian missionaries had been intent upon the destruction of Armanist culture, its actual non-existence in the present could be related to empirical events...List's account of Christianization in the historic German lands reiterated the debilitation of Teutonic vigour and morale and the destruction of German national consciousness. He claimed that the Church's gospel of love and charity had encouraged a deviation from the strict eugenics of ‘the old Aryan sexual morality’...it was he who had demonized the Church as the sole source of evil in the pan-German scheme of belief (Goodrick-Clarke:68f).



Unfortunately, the occult dimension of Nazi history is overlooked by many historians who must attempt, therefore, to find materialist answers to ideological questions. And if the occult dimension has been ignored, this is doubly true of the homosexual dimension. As Duberman, Vicinus and Chauncey have stated in the title to their “gay studies” text, the role of homosexuals and pederasts has been Hidden from History. They, of course, imagine the influence of homosexuality to be positive. Yet the rise of homosexuality in a Judeo-Christian-based culture necessarily represents the diminution of Biblical morality as a restraint on human passions. Consequently, where Judeo-Christian ideals decrease, violence and depravity increase.



It was the pederasts of the Community of the Elite who, in large part, sponsored the revival of Hellenic pagan ideals in German society. These men were fanatically anti-Jew and anti-Christian because of the injunctions against homosexuality implicit in the Judeo-Christian sexual ethic. Johansson notes that Hans Blueher, one of the leading theoreticians of the Community of the Elite, “maintained that Judaism had suppressed the homosexual aspect of its culture, with concomitant hypertrophy [enlargement] of the family” (Johansson:816). Benedict Friedlander, in an essay for Der Eigene titled “Seven Propositions,” chose as his first proposition an attack on Christianity. “The white race is becoming ever sicker under the curse of Christianity, which is foreign to it and mostly harmful,” writes Friedlander. “That is the genuinely bad ‘Jewish influence,’ an opinion that has proven true, especially through the conditions in North America” (Friedlander in Oosterhuis and Kennedy:219).



For his part, Adolf Brand called Christianity “barbarism” and “expressed his desire to fight ‘beyond good and evil,’ not for the sake of the masses, since the happiness of ‘the weak’ would result in a ‘slave mentality,’ but for the human being who proclaimed himself a god and was not to be subdued by human laws and ethics” (Oosterhuis and Kennedy:183). We should not forget Nietzsche, who called Christianity “the lie of millennia” (Macintyre:188).

Much has been made of the reported silence, and in some cases complicity, of the supposed Christian churches during the Third Reich. But few have noted the long period of “Biblical deconstruction” that preceded the rise of Nazism, and fewer still have chronicled the systematic perversion of German religious culture by the Nazis themselves.



While the neo-pagans were busy attacking from without, liberal theologians undermined Biblical authority from within the Christian church. The school of so-called “higher criticism,” which began in Germany in the late 1800s, portrayed the miracles of God as myths; by implication making true believers (Jew and Christian alike) into fools. And since the Bible was no longer accepted as God’s divine and inerrant guide, it could be ignored or reinterpreted. By the time the Nazis came to power, “Bible-believing” Christians, (the Confessing Church of Barth and Bonhoeffer) were a small minority. Francis Schaeffer writes of this phenomenon in The Great Evangelical Disaster:



In the late nineteenth century it was these ideas [the all-sufficiency of human reason and the falsehood of supernatural religion] which began to radically transform Christianity...This started especially with the acceptance of the “higher critical” methods that had been developed in Germany. Using these methods, the new liberal theologians completely undercut the authority of Scripture...in spite of the efforts of...[theologians Hodges, Warfield and later Machen], the destructive methods of biblical criticism came into power and control in the denominations. By the 1930s liberalism had swept through most of the denominations and the battle was all but lost (Schaeffer:34).



The replacement for Biblical Christianity in Germany was a pseudo-Christian “pietism” that grew increasingly more bizarre as devotion to the social ideals of traditional Christianity was divorced from its source. In The Twelve Year Reich, social historian Richard Grunberger writes of Nazi-sponsored “charity” drives, for example, in which collectors of surplus goods for the poor became irrational fanatics:



[Collectors] indefatigably pounded the staircases of apartment houses in the large towns, rooting out the last possible donor...Small rural communities erected what were known as Boards of Shame, listing those who, ‘despite financial ability, refuse to make donations.’ Not infrequently, ‘selfish elements’ were victims of organized physical violence: ‘Widow B. of Volksdorf, who had only contributed riding boots to a Winter Relief collection of clothing, had to ask the police to take her into protective custody after a threatening crowd gathered outside her house and started to smash her greenhouses.’ Hereditary farmer, Bernard Sommer Kempdorf, who had told the collectors that if they wanted any fruit from him they were at liberty to pick it off the trees themselves, had to be taken into protective custody when a crowd of hundreds gathered around his farm chanting demands for his imprisonment. (Grunberger:88).



The Germans under Hitler developed a “purely German i.e. de-Romanized and de-Judaicized form of Christianity,” writes Grunberger, while the growing “New Heathenism” rejected Jesus entirely and substituted “either Wotan worship or a cult of nature centered on the Sun” (ibid.:482). Soon, this neo-paganism had entered the weakened churches. “German Christianity [began to focus] on the Aryan savior Jesus...[and theological studies appeared] under such titles as ‘Wotan and Jesus,’ ‘Baldur and the Bible,’ and ‘The German Savior’” (ibid.:482).



Despite all this, however, it would be a mistake to believe that the German church, as liberal and/or heretical as it had become, would have supported Hitler’s total agenda on its own. On the contrary, Hitler and the Nazi elite were forced to conduct a slow and methodical takeover of the German churches to silence their dissent.



In September of 1933, a pro-Nazi cleric named Ludwig Muller was appointed by Hitler to bring all evangelical congregations into one State Evangelical Church. Heiden writes that “The Reich Bishop [Muller] was not formally inducted into his office before the year had expired and the last independent Churches in Bavaria and Wurttemberg had been suppressed” (Heiden, 1935:405). Justice Robert Jackson, prosecutor of the Nazi war criminals at Nurnberg many years later noted that “the policy toward the Evangelical Churches...was to use their influence for the Nazis own purposes” (Jackson:51). This was perhaps best evidenced by Muller’s decision in December, 1933 to transfer the Evangelical youth organization into the Hitler Youth which caused a complete break with the so-called Confessing Church of anti-Nazi congregations (Zentner and Bedurftig:608). Pastor Niemoller, leader of the Confessing Church, was later sent to a concentration camp (Jackson:51).



In March of 1935 seven hundred Protestant priests were arrested by the Gestapo in Prussia “for issuing condemnations of neo-paganism from the pulpit,” and later a similar number of clergy in Wuerttemberg had their teaching credentials stripped for “‘violating the moral instincts of the German race’ by references to Abraham, Joseph and David in the course of their teaching” (ibid.:494). The Nazis confiscated Protestant seminaries in Wuerttemberg and Catholic convents and monasteries in the Rhineland (ibid.:500). In May of 1941, a Nazi decree banned all Catholic periodicals and newspapers (Fact on File Yearbook, 1941:240).



As Grunberger asserts, Nazism itself was a “pseudo-religion” (Grunberger:79) that competed, covertly, with Christianity and Judaism. The Nazi regime, attempting to usurp the role of the church and eliminate its influence on German culture, “spawned an unending series of relatively minor, but cumulatively effective, anti-Church measures” (ibid.:500). The Nazi Party’s spiritual adjunct, the German Faith Movement (Deutsche Glaubensbewegung), represented one of several fronts in this war on the church. Its most profound attack upon Christianity, expressed by a Faith Movement leader, was the doctrine that “God has manifested himself not in Jesus Christ, but in Adolf Hitler” (Snyder:104). Grunberger writes,



The movement...could best be defined by its negative articles of faith of which the chief was enmity to Christianity and the established churches. Planning to use neo-pagan “conversion” to complement its own more general anti-Church measures (such as hamstringing communal and youth organizations, or attenuating religious instruction in schools), the Party therefore launched a drive to make individual parishioners withdraw from Church membership. The “Church Secessionist Campaign” was particularly effective among professionals materially dependent on the regime: civil servants, municipal employees, teachers, [and] full-time party workers (Grunberger:491).



As soon as the Nazis came to power they replaced many Christian holidays with pagan celebrations: “The Day of the Summer Solstice,” “The Day of the Winter Solstice,” and “Mothering Sunday” (which featured the so-called “Rune of Life” as a symbol to honor births) (ibid.:80f.). Marriage ceremonies increasingly invoked “Mother Earth” and “Father Sky” as the deities by whom the covenant was blessed (ibid.:492). Birth and death announcements began to feature the life and death runes, respectively, as part of a campaign to eliminate the star and the cross from public life, and crucifixes were gradually removed from hospitals and schools (ibid.:494). The Nazis made all religious activities which were not centered in the churches dependent on official permission and confiscated lists of churchgoers who were on active duty in the military (ibid.:500).



The schools were heavily targeted in the strategy to deChristianize the young. Mandatory prayer in schools was stopped in 1935, and from 1941 onward, religious instruction was completely eliminated for all students over fourteen years old (ibid.:494f). The Nazi Teachers Association actively discouraged its members from taking religious instruction, while at the same time many teachers of religious studies (who were all required to be licensed by the state) “inculcated neo-paganism into their pupils during periods of religious instruction.” Later, teachers were outright prohibited from attending voluntary religion classes organized by the Catholic church (ibid.:495).



In an obscene twist, the Nazis used former Christian religious facilities, seized by the government, to establish schools in which students were trained in male supremacist ideology, using teachings from the works of homosexual theorists such as Otto Weininger (Rosenthal:69).

Igra writes,



[Weininger’s Sex and Character] was revived as a kind of text book in the Nazi Ordensburgen, those schools for the training of future German leaders which have been set up in the confiscated monasteries and convents. There they learn the doctrine that ‘the lowest type of male is infinitely higher than the noblest woman,’ and that ‘by her very nature, woman is deceitful, mentally inferior to man and unmoral’ (Igra:99).



The de-Christianization of German society was carried out in the Nazis’ characteristically duplicitous style. Ever masters of the euphemism and of political sleight-of-hand, they kept the general population confused about their true motives. When Hitler needed the support of the churches in the early days of the regime, for example, the SA attended Sunday services en masse, creating “veritable SA church parades” (Grunberger:485). But just months later these same troops marched in the Nuremberg Party Rally alongside the Hitler Youth as they sang anti-Christian songs. “No evil priest can prevent us from feeling that we are the children of Hitler,” the children sang. “We follow not Christ, but Horst Wessel. Away with incense and holy water...The swastika brings salvation on earth” (ibid.:489). For their part, the SA sang, “Storm Trooper Comrades, hang the Jews and put the priests against the wall” as the refrain to one of their favorite tunes.



In Hitler and I, Strasser records a conversation he had with Hitler, in which Strasser criticized Nazi propagandist Alfred Rosenberg for his pagan ideals. “Hitler stopped and looked me in the eyes,” writes Strasser, “‘Christianity is, for the moment, one of the points in the programme I have laid down. But we must look ahead. Rosenberg is a forerunner, a prophet. His theories are the expression of the German soul’” (Strasser, 1940:96). Much later, as Hitler’s religion of hate appeared to have completely overwhelmed the German culture, Hitler proclaimed, “Do you really believe the masses will ever be Christian again? Nonsense, that tale is finished” (Newton:16).



From the early years, leading Nazis openly attacked Christianity. Joseph Goebbels declared that “Christianity has infused our erotic attitudes with dishonesty” (Taylor:20). Himmler is reported to have considered Christianity “the greatest plague delivered by history, and demanded that it be dealt with accordingly” (Ziegler:85).



Martin Bormann, who replaced Hess as Deputy Fuehrer, issued a decree to the Party Gauleiters titled, “The Relations Between National Socialism and Christianity” in which he said “National Socialist and Christian conceptions are incompatible. The Christian churches build upon men’s ignorance...The people must be increasingly wrested from the churches...Never again must the churches be allowed any influence over the leadership of the people. This must be broken totally and forever” (Fest, 1970:132f). The Nazis ultimate goal was the elimination of all the Christian churches. Grunberger points out that “[j]ust as the genocide programme provided for certain areas to be made ‘free of Jews’ before others, so the Warthegau [the Posen-Lodz civil defense region] was envisioned as the first region to be ‘free of churches’ in the Reich” (Grunberger:498).



It is in the Nazi campaign against Judeo-Christian morality that we find one of the reasons for the German people’s acceptance of Nazism’s most extreme atrocities. Their religious foundations had been systematically eroded over a period of decades by powerful social forces.



By the time the Nazis came to power, German culture was spiritually bankrupt. Historians have largely ignored the spiritual element of Nazi history, but if we look closely at Hitler’s campaign of extermination of the Jews, it becomes clear that his ostensible racial motive obscures a deeper and more primal hatred of the Jews as the “People of God.”



The probable reason for Hitler’s attack on Christianity was his perception that it alone had the moral authority to stop the Nazi movement. As late as March 19, 1942, Julius Streicher, in an article appearing in his publication Der Sturmer complained that Christian teachings stood in the way of a “radical solution the Jewish question in Europe” (Jackson:54). But Christians stumbled before the flood of evil. As Poliakov notes, “[W]hen moral barriers collapsed under the impact of Nazi preaching...the same anti-Semitic movement that led to the slaughter of the Jews gave scope and license to an obscene revolt against God and the moral law. An open and implacable war was declared on the Christian tradition...[which unleashed] a frenzied and unavowed hatred of Christ and the Ten Commandments” (Poliakov:300).



As we examine the issue of Nazi hatred for Christianity we are reminded of the common moral standard shared by believing Christians and Jews. It is a standard which unequivocally condemns homosexuality. This fact assumes enormous significance in the context of this book and causes us to question the common wisdom, which explains the Holocaust in purely racial terms.



We have shown how homosexuality figures prominently in the history of the Holocaust. The ideas for disposing of the Jews originated with Lanz. The first acts of terrorism against the Jews were carried out by the homosexuals of the SA. The first pogrom, Kristallnacht, was orchestrated in 1938 by the homosexual Reinhard Heydrich. And it was the sometime transvestite Goering who started the “evolution of the Final Solution...[with an] order to Heydrich (Jan. 24, 1939) concerning the solution of the Jewish question by ‘emigration’ and ‘evacuation’” (Robinson:25).









Homosexuality and Islamist Terrorism



We turn next to the relationship between the Nazi regime and the Islamist terror groups which share its militarism and its anti-Semitism. We distinguish the Islamist terrorists from the specifically fascist and “neo-Nazi” successors to the Third Reich which will be addressed in the next chapter. Interestingly, while Hitler ranted against Judaism and Christianity, he contrasted the “[Judeo-Christian] theological doctrines devoid of any depth” with “those of...Mohamed [which provided spiritual] sustenance of a much different value” (Angebert:246).

Islamist terrorism has become an issue of great interest since the attacks of September 11th, 2001, against the United States. Interestingly, the leaders of the nineteen terrorists, including ringleader Mohamed Atta, have been reported to be homosexuals. “Gay” journalist Rex Wockner, quoting what he described as “the sensationalistic-yet-often-accurate National Enquirer” reported that “‘Atta’s gay lover for the past two years was his right-hand man, Abdulaziz Alomari, who was with Atta when he crashed the plane into the North Tower’....Atta and other terrorists believed that ‘women are for procreation only and men are for recreation’” (Wockner Wire, www.PlanetOut.com, November 9, 2001). Uncharacteristically, the left-leaning Newsweek magazine “scooped” the Enquirer with a piece about the Enquirer story before it was released: “gay” strategist Michelangelo Signorile produced an editorial which, while not denying the truth of the Enquirer claims, dismissed them as irrelevant to the evil behavior of the terrorists.



Few are aware that some of the earliest terrorism of the modern era sprang from a Nazi/Arab collaboration. According to Icelandic historian, S. G. Bergsson, in Muftism and Nazism, the leading figure in this collaboration was Haj Amin Husseini, the Mufti (supreme religious leader) of Jerusalem. One of the leaders of the massacre of Jews in the 1920 Arab riots in Palestine, he became Mufti in 1921 and celebrated by organizing a Jewish pogrom that year.



Husseini first made contact with the Nazi regime in 1933, and by 1936 was carrying out anti­

Jewish riots “with funds supplied by the Nazis” (Bergsson:chapter 3, p.2f.). In 1937, “during the celebration of Mohammed’s birth, the German swastika flag was flying high as well as pictures of Hitler” (Ibid.). When the British stopped secret arms shipments to the Mufti in 1938, he declared jihad against them, was quickly defeated and fled to Germany. From then on he coordinated a large and active worldwide network of pro-Nazi Moslems from Berlin and agitated for the extermination of all Jews. Hitler was friendly with Husseini, giving him the honorary rank of SS Major (Ibid.).



The Sowetan newspaper of Johannesburg published this editorial by South African legislator Jack Bloom:

Ambiguous Arab-Muslim attitudes to Hitler can be traced to his popularity in much of the Arab world both before and during the Second World War. Political parties that imitated the Nazis were founded, such as the Syrian Social Nationalist Party and Young Eqypt, replete with storm troopers, torch processions and Nazi slogans. The most significant collaborator with Hitler was...Haj Amin el-Husseini....His energetic pro-Nazi efforts included a Muslim SS unit in Bosnia...



General Abdul Nasser was a member of Young Egypt and made no secret of his earlier Nazi sympathies when he became president of Egypt. Former Nazis served in his army and secret police, and his personal bodyguard was SS General Oskar Dirlewanger (The Sowetan, October 2, 2001).



One of the reasons for Nazi popularity in Egypt is that Nasser’s brother Nassiri published and distributed an Arab edition of Mein Kampf in 1939 (Mac Mathuna, Flame Magazine, 1999).



Oskar Dirlewanger (see Chapter Six), was the creator of the dreaded SS Sonderkommando Dirlewanger which some homosexual inmates joined to gain release from Nazi concentration camps. Dirlewanger, was assisted by former Hitler buddies, Otto Skorzeny and Eugen Dollman, who recruited “‘large numbers’ of former Nazi fugitives from Argentina for key posts in the new republican regime in Egypt” (ibid.). Dollman was well known as a homosexual; less is known about Skorzeny, although he had been Hitler’s bodyguard in 1939, and is thus likely to have been “gay.”



We have not found evidence that Husseini was homosexual. However, historian Jamie Glazov explains the phenomenon of Islamist terrorism itself as the consequence of rampant pederasty in parts of the Arab world. He writes,



Socially segregated from women, Arab men succumb to homosexual behavior. But, interestingly enough, there is no word for “homosexual” in their culture in the modern Western sense. That is because having sex with boys, or with effeminate men, is seen as a social norm. Males serve as available substitutes for unavailable women. The man who does the penetrating, meanwhile, is not emasculated...The man who is penetrated is emasculated. The boy, however, is not, since it is rationalized that he is not yet a man.



In this culture, males sexually penetrating males becomes a manifestation of male power, conferring a status of hyper-masculinity....In all of these circumstances, the idea of love is removed from men’s understanding of sexuality. Like the essence of Arab masculinity, it is reduced to hurting others by violence....It is excruciating to imagine the sexual confusion, humiliation, and repression that evolve in the mindsets of males in this culture. But it is no surprise that many of these males find their only avenue for gratification in the act of humiliating a foreign “enemy,” whose masculinity must be violated at all costs --as theirs once was (Glazov, “The Sexual Rage Behind Islamic Terror,” FrontPage magazine, 10-4-01). [For a comparison with the Spartan military camps, see pp. 54-61.]

Scholar Bruce Dunne of Georgetown University portrays the sexual world of some Arab males as a realm of unspoken and unequal “Butch/Fem" bisexuality. In this world, as with the pre-Nazi “gay” factions in Weimar Germany, “Butches” are “not [even] considered homosexual” while “Fems” are considered to be suffering from an “inexplicable...pathology” (Dunne, “Power and Sexuality in the Middle East,” Middle East Report, Spring, 1998). (This attitude is not found in all Islamic societies, only those which combine hyper-masculine militarism with misogyny.)



Another parallel is the case of terrorist leader Yasir Arafat. According to Dr. Asher Eder, Jewish Co-Chairman of the Islam-Israel Fellowship organization, the name “Yassir Arafat” is an alias. Arafat changed his real name, Abdul Rauf el-Codbi el-Husseini, to hide his relationship to Mufti Haj Amin Husseini, his uncle (Eder, “How to Disarm the Terrible Jihad Psychosis Against Jews and Israel that Afflicts the Muslim World Today,” www.rb.org, February 24, 2000).



Arafat’s homosexuality has been widely acknowledged since at least 1976, when the testimony of a former associate (also homosexual) was published in a Canadian biography, Arafat, the Man and the Myth by Thomas Kiernan. Kiernan quotes this man at length:



We went one night on a training exercise, about twenty of us. We were camped in a citrus grove near Gaza in tents. There was an emergency of some kind...Several of us ran to Abu Khalid’s tent to find out what we should do. There we discovered Abu Khalid and Yasir giving themselves pleasure --or should I say Yasir was giving Abu Khalid pleasure? After that, Abu Khalid was quite open about what he did with Yasir. In fact, he encouraged all of us to participate in such activities. He said it should be a part of the guerrilla way of life....It created a closer bond among us. Most of us sooner or later were doing it as a regular way of life. Some of us even gave pleasure to Abu Khalid, and him to us. But he would never let us touch Yasir. Yasir was his special province (Kiernan:108).

Arafat is more often identified by his critics as a pederast than simply a homosexual, but we did not find documentation of his alleged abuse of boys.



Recent events show that common cause still exists between Islamic radicals and Nazis: both celebrated the terror attacks of September 11th. Arafat’s Palestinian supporters, including police officers, were caught on camera celebrating wildly in the streets upon hearing the news. Meanwhile, German neo-Nazi Horst Mahler used his website to thank the terrorists for “knocking out” the “common enemy,” while another Nazi group, the National Resistance (NW) said September 11th was a day for celebration (The Observer, UK, 10-7-01). Hans-Joachim Kunz, of the Bavarian section of the German Office for the Protection of the Constitution, explained that “neo-Nazis and Islamic fundamentalists have a common ideology and that is they both see the USA as their enemy” (ibid.).



We have shown that a hidden motive for Nazi anti-Semitism was a deep hatred of Biblical morality. This conclusion, supported by the comments of key Nazi thinkers, provides a more satisfying explanation for Nazi policies than does racism alone. For while widely-promoted racial theories seem sufficient to explain the persecution of the Jews, they do not explain the Nazi’s equal hatred of Bible-believing Christians. The Nazis were apparently not hostile to Moslems, even though Islam ostensibly draws its authority from the same Bible. This was not merely the pragmatic tolerance of a military ally. It seems likely that the Nazis were genuinely drawn to their hyper-masculine brothers-in-arms because they shared a common homoerotic spirit.



We will find that this thread of homoeroticism is woven throughout the history of post-Hitler fascism as well.



American homo fascism



Hay was not a fascist, but he was a neo-pagan. He participated in occultic rituals at “the Los Angeles lodge of the Order of the Eastern Temple, O.T.O., Aleister Crowley’s notorious anti-Christian spiritual group” (Timmons:76). Hay provided musical accompaniment to ceremonies performed by the lesbian “high priestess.” Later in life he founded a New Age group called Radical Faeries, which met in an asram in the high desert of Arizona to offer invocations to pagan spirits (ibid.:265).



In some ways, Hay can be compared to Karl Heinrich Ulrichs, the “grandfather” of the gay rights movement. Hay is his American counterpart in the sense that both men launched enduring social movements in their respective cultures. The avowed purpose of each was to undermine the Judeo-Christian moral consensus in respect to homosexual relations. And both had been molested as boys (though some suggest that this is the rule rather than the exception among homosexual men). But unlike Ulrichs, Hay became increasingly militant over the course of his life until, in the 1980s, he participated in California’s notoriously violent ACT-UP demonstrations (ibid.:292). ACT-UP, the AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power, was one of the earliest manifestations of homo-fascism in the “gay rights” movement. Though Hay was in his 70s, and is not directly linked to any of the property destruction associated with ACT-UP demonstrations, his presence validated the terrorist tactics of the group. Hay also openly endorsed pederasty as an essential part of the “gay rights” movement (ibid.:296).



Harry Hay and the Mattachine Society spawned large-scale political and social activism among homosexuals that soon outgrew their expectations and their control. Their highly motivated activists operated in groups designed like communist cells, each a “secret fraternity” bound by the common vice. As Hay stated in a later interview, “[we wanted to] keep them underground and separated so that no one group could ever know who all the other members were” (J. Katz:410). Slowly at first, from innumerable obscure sources, came theories, public statements and actions in support of the social acceptance of homosexuality. And as the power of the homosexualist political lobby grew, so did the ugliness of its demands and its methods.







Alfred Kinsey and the Kinsey Institute



Alfred Kinsey was funded by the Satanic Rockefellers in their search to transform American Society towards Satanism.

In this search, Alfred Kinsey - liar - from the Father of Lies - was very effective..

While Harry Hay would soon take the homosexual movement public with the Mattachine Society, most homosexual activism continued to be carried out by hidden cell groups and individual “in the closet” activists. One such activist was Alfred Kinsey. No one but Kinsey’s closest associates and sex partners knew that his image as a respectable family man and college professor masked his role as one of the most dedicated homosexual change-agents in America.



In 1948, sex researcher Kinsey released his culture-shattering book, Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. The first major sex study of its kind, the Kinsey Report purported to show that Americans were far more promiscuous and sexually deviant than they said they were (Reisman and Eichel, 1992:2). For over forty years, Kinsey’s data went more-or-less unchallenged and the conclusions that he drew continue to serve as the “scientific” justification for the so-called sexual revolution. His theory of sex as a mere “outlet” released human behavior from what Marcuse called “the repressive order of procreative sexuality.” All forms of sexual expression were equalized in the Kinsey model.



Recently, several studies have shown that America is not the hotbed of promiscuity and deviancy that Kinsey's study made it appear to be, even after forty-six years of influence by that study, which was loudly trumpeted as “fact” by the media and much of academia. U.S. News and World Report reported that one such recent study, conducted by the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago, that it showed that “[f]idelity reigns. Fully 83 percent of Americans had sex with one person or had no sex partners in the past year, and half of Americans have had only one partner in the past five years” (U.S. News and World Report, October, 1994:75).



Kinsey’s study was tailor-made for the homosexual/pederast community. Indeed, just weeks after its release, Harry Hay formally launched the Mattachine Society. We have no proof that Kinsey and Hay actually coordinated their efforts, although we know that Hay and Kinsey met together more than seven years before the publication of the first Kinsey report (Timmons:111). We also know that influential Kinsey co-worker, Wardell Pomeroy, later became a member of the Mattachine Society’s advisory board, perhaps indicating a deeper relationship between the Kinsey organization and the Mattachines (Marotta:80).



Kinsey’s vastly inflated figure of the number of homosexuals in America is the basis of the enduring myth that at least 10% of the population is homosexual. His seven-point Kinsey Scale, “in which bisexuality occupied a middle ‘balanced’ position between heterosexuality (0) and homosexuality (6)” (ibid.:10), attempted to establish homosexuality as a norm by definition. He further declared adult/child sex harmless. This “finding” was based on data gathered by pedophiles from experimentation with hundreds of children as young as two months old (ibid.:36).

In Kinsey, Sex and Fraud, Reisman and Eichel state that Kinsey “purported to prove that children were sexual beings, even from infancy and that they could, and should, have pleasurable and beneficial sexual interaction with adult ‘partners’” (ibid.:3). Reisman and Eichel go on to suggest that Kinsey deliberately overlooked criminal sexual child abuse and purposefully falsified data to further his personal sexual and political agenda. They cite former Kinsey coworker Gershon Legman who said that “Kinsey’s not-very-secret intention was to ‘respectablize’ homosexuality and certain sexual perversions” (ibid.:34). They also reference sociologists Albert Hobbs and Richard Lambert who observed “that the Kinsey authors seemed purposefully to ignore the limitations of their own samples in order ‘to compound any possible errors in almost any way which will increase the apparent incidence of [homosexuality]’” (ibid.:24).



Was Kinsey a homosexual, a pedophile or both? One historian proposed that Kinsey “may have discovered in himself the homosexual tendencies he would later ascribe to a large proportion of the population” (Robinson in Reisman and Eichel, 1992:204). But Reisman and Eichel suggest he manifested more of the behaviors of a pedophile. “In addition to his interest in sex experiments with children,” they write, “Kinsey was an avid collector of pornography (and maker of sex films) — an elemental feature of the pedophile syndrome” (Reisman and Eichel, 1992:205). In a later work, Reisman reports more specifically that Kinsey produced and directed films of homosexual sado-masochism at Indiana University, and that his collection of pornography included films of children engaged in sexual acts (Reisman,1998:80f).



There is no question, however, that Kinsey fits the profile of a homosexual activist. Like the militant homosexuals who benefitted from his work, Kinsey was “indignant about the effect of Judeo-Christian tradition on society,” write Reisman and Eichel. “It is clear that he shared [co­researcher Wardell] Pomeroy’s view that Christians inherited an almost paranoid approach to sexual behavior from the Jews” (ibid.:6). Pomeroy, incidentally, is known for his support of adult/child sex. In a 1992 article on pedophilia, author Michael Ebert quotes Pomeroy as saying, “People seem to think that any [sexual] contact between children and adults has a bad effect on the child. I say this can be a loving and thoughtful, responsible sexual activity” (Ebert:6f).



The Kinsey Institute should be recognized as the American counterpart and successor to the Sex Research Institute of Berlin. Indeed, E. Michael Jones, editor of Fidelity magazine told one of us (Lively) in conversation that he had perused some of the surviving documents of the Berlin institute in the basement of the Kinsey building. Like its German predecessor had been, the Kinsey Institute is dedicated to the legitimization of sexual perversion.





The Sexual and Drug Revolution



Within five years of the Kinsey report, Hugh Hefner launched Playboy magazine (and the modern pornography industry), whose initial target audience was the very generation of young men to whom Kinsey had been speaking on his college lecture circuit. More significantly, it popularized Kinsey’s “gay” ethic of sexual license with the much of the rest of the male population of America. Hefner himself is quoted as saying that if Kinsey were the researcher of the sexual revolution, he (Hefner) was the pamphleteer (Reisman, 1998:108).

SATANIC PAMELA ANDERSON



We are not suggesting the Hefner is homosexual, only that Playboy magazine serves as a tool of “gay” social engineering in that the existence of a thriving pornography industry serves the “gay” cause by morally corrupting the men who use it.

It logically makes them less likely to oppose homosexuality on moral grounds and more likely to support public policies which legitimize sexual license. Exposure to pornography, especially at a young age, can also be a gateway into the “gay” lifestyle itself.



In the same manner, the “gay” cause is advanced by a successful abortion industry (which also arose in response to the sexual revolution). The choice to kill their unborn children morally compromises both men and women (making them unwilling to criticize the choice to engage in other forms of immoral behavior), and ensures that the outcome of an unwanted child will not be a lasting deterrent to those who have chosen sexual license over family. This explains why homosexuals, who by definition cannot bear children together, are among the most militant advocates of abortion on demand.



The acceptance of sexual indulgence as an important social value inevitably initiates a downward moral spiral in a culture. In American society, the selling of the idea of recreational sex to young college-aged men in the 1950s created a “market” for immodest and sexually adventurous young women, which in turn helped to legitimize the idea of female promiscuity. In the 1960s, once immodesty and promiscuity became acceptable for some women, the pressure increased for all women, competing for the attentions of men, to adopt these behaviors. This was especially true of the youngest of marriage-age women of that generation, whose personal morals and values had been influenced by a decade of sex-saturated pop culture.



The wholesale entrance of women into the world of sexual license created a number of societal demands: for a feminist political movement to “liberate” women from social expectations about marriage and child-rearing (National Organization for Women formed 1966); for contraception on demand (Griswold v. Connecticut --1966); for abortion on demand (Roe. V. Wade --1973); and for “no fault” divorce (state-by-state liberalization of divorce laws began in the early 1970s). The result of these policies has been the achievement of the “gay” goal as embodied by Kinsey’s teachings: the progressive denormalization of marriage and the steady normalization of sexual license. The most recent census data, published in 1998, showed a fourfold increase in divorce from 1970 to 1996, while the population of “cohabiting” couples who had never married had more than doubled.



Among the side-effects produced by these dramatic changes in the life of a people, side-effects which have increased steadily since the 1960s, are the escalation of crime (especially violent crime), the proliferation of sexually-transmitted and other diseases, and the escalation of mental illness and chronic substance abuse. These are all results which one would expect to find in a generation of citizens raised in unstable homes. Each and every one of these social problems is a direct consequence of embracing the “gay” ethic of sexual license as popularized by Kinsey.



Meanwhile, as the pursuit of sexual hedonism became the personal goal of an ever larger percentage of the non-homosexual population, the “gay” movement continued its advance.





President Bill Clinton has called for “hate crimes” legislation based on “sexual orientation” (code words for homosexuality). A few days ago, in an act unprecedented in the history of the presidency, Mr. Clinton aligned himself with the homosexual cause at a fund-raiser for the Human Rights Campaign Fund, the “gay” movement’s largest political action committee. Knowing what it cost this president in 1993 to endorse “gays in the military,” I am wondering what “gay” leaders might have promised the president in exchange for this new endorsement. Or can it be that public perception of the “gay” movement has changed so much that the Clinton administration (notorious for its reliance on polls and “focus groups”) has decided that it is now safe for the president to identify himself and his office with the “gay” political agenda.



This question has personal significance for me, since I was one of the few people to publicly challenge then-candidate Clinton on his support for “gay” issues during his first run for presidential office. In response to my questions during a live Town Hall television program (simulcast from Seattle, Washington and Portland, Oregon), Mr. Clinton said he was against promoting homosexuality as a valid, alternative lifestyle to young people. At that time he also affirmed the right of the Boy Scouts to exclude “gay” scout leaders.



I raise this issue to contrast the benign public image of “gays” with the face of the “gay” movement that we have seen in these pages. Those whose perceptions of the “gay” movement have been shaped primarily by the popular media may find President Clinton's pro-“gay” political actions appropriate, even laudable. Such people have been persuaded that “gays” are society's victims in need of protection. But the “gay” movement I have seen and investigated is neither benign, nor are its members “victims.” It is vicious, deceptive and enormously powerful.



Its philosophy is Machiavellian and its tactics are (literally) Hitlerian.



What explains the dichotomy of perspectives on the “gay” movement? If any of the facts in this book are true, then the image of the “gay” movement Bill Clinton and other pro-“gay” opinion makers would like you to accept cannot be true. Are typical heterosexual supporters of “gay rights” simply unconcerned about the association of homosexuality with personal and societal dysfunction and violence? Or have these presumably well-intentioned people been denied complete information?



I have always been cautious of the word conspiracy, yet this is the word which best describes how the “gatekeepers” of American popular culture have helped to shape public opinion on this issue. The truth about homosexuality and the Nazi Party (indeed most information that might reflect negatively on the “gay” movement) appears to have been deliberately suppressed. We know that so-called “gay rights” has become a virtual cause celebre among the self-styled cultural elites in government, academia and the news and entertainment media. Over fifty years ago Samuel Igra also observed that homosexualism “had become a veritable cult among the ruling classes” in Germany prior to the rise of Hitler. I have come to believe that America's cultural elitists, perceiving themselves to be the moral arbiters of our society and the protectors of “gays,” have used their power and their positions to protect and shield the “gay” movement from all unfavorable publicity. More than this, they have colluded to promote an image of “gays” as sterling citizens.



When I initially learned the truths set forth in this book, I was first astonished and then angered. Why had this information never surfaced during the many months in which the Oregon campaign to stop the “gay” agenda was continually being compared (in the local and national media) to the Nazi regime? The information is certainly not hidden. Anyone with the most basic research skills could easily find many of the two hundred-odd sources we have cited in this book. Are we to believe that the hundreds of trained journalists, college professors and politicians who helped guide the debate on that campaign (and many similar events) failed to discover any of these sources? We must assume that at least some of these professionals knew of these facts but decided not to inform the public. At best this represents an appalling level of arrogance (allowing that they might have disregarded these facts as not credible — denying “common” people the right to make up their own minds). The more plausible (and more frightening) conclusion is that the facts were withheld because of their likely negative impact on the “gay” movement.



“Gay” political power derives in large part from the public perception that homosexuals are victims. As Kirk and Pill so baldly admitted in The Overhauling of Straight America, “gays must be cast as victims in need of protection so that straights will be inclined by reflex to assume the role of protector.” What would happen to the protective instinct of Americans if they knew that many of the worst villains of the Third Reich were “gay”? How closely would America scrutinize the “gay” agenda if “homoeroticism” were revealed as the very foundation of Nazism? (And I believe the movement would not survive such scrutiny). The evidence points to a conspiracy of silence — a nearly universal self-censorship by the same opinion-makers who mock conspiracy theories and decry any form of censorship.



If the facts in this book are true, and if it is also true that the “gatekeepers” of our public information are deliberately keeping these facts from us, can we hope to educate our fellow citizens before the “gay agenda” plunges this nation into social chaos? The outcome is uncertain.



Surely, however, there have been times in the past when the inevitable repetitions of history were derailed by a few warning voices. It is our hope that the facts we have presented here will penetrate the fog of media-sponsored misinformation and “political correctness.”



Have we exaggerated the urgency of our task? I think not. The future of America, indeed of civilization itself, depends upon the preservation of the natural family --God’s model for effective human society and the training ground for healthy human relationships. Yet the goal of the “gay” movement is the devaluation of the Judeo-Christian sexual ethic (monogamous heterosexual family-centered marriage) and its replacement with a “gay” affirming pagan alternative.



The “gay” movement in America (as contrasted with the German version) is different in style but not in substance. It remains characteristically selfish and hedonistic, but more importantly it continues to be defined by what it is against: Judeo-Christian family-based society. This “gay” vision for America is best defined in a widely circulated satirical essay written by a homosexualist under the pseudonym “Michael Swift” (probably to remind us of the political satire of Jonathan Swift. Although the writer intends to discredit this view of the homosexual agenda, its very eloquence (in the context of our study) belies this attempt. Echoing from the ancient Spartan culture, from the Teutons, from the Knights Templar, from the SA under Ernst Roehm, and now from the American “gay rights” movement comes this, our final glimpse into the fascist heart of homosexualism:



This essay is outre, madness, a tragic, cruel fantasy, an eruption of inner rage, on how the oppressed dream of being the oppressor. We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools [Project 10], in your dormitories [forced homosexual roommates], in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in your seminaries, in your youth groups [Wandervoegel , Boy Scouts], in your movie theater bathrooms, in your army bunkhouses [“gays in the military”], in your truck stops, in your all-male clubs, in your houses of Congress, wherever men are with men together.

Your sons will become our minions and do our bidding. They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us. Women, you cry for your freedom. You say you are no longer satisfied with men; they make you unhappy [radical feminism, lesbian separatist movement]. We, connoisseurs of the masculine face, the masculine physique, shall take your men from you then.

We will amuse them; we will embrace them when they weep. Women, you say you wish to live with each other instead of men. Then go ahead and be with each other. We shall give your men pleasures they have never known because we are foremost men too and only one man knows how to truly please another man; only one man can understand with depth and feeling the mind and body of another man.

All laws banning homosexual activity will be revoked [anti-discrimination ordinances, minority status based on homosexuality]. Instead, legislation shall be passed which engenders love between men [graphic “pro-gay” sex and AIDS education, mandatory “sensitivity training,”]. All homosexuals must stand together as brothers; we must be united artistically, philosophically, socially, politically and financially [the multi-faceted and powerful “gay rights” movement].

We will triumph only when we present a common face to the vicious heterosexual enemy [suppression of internecine conflicts and other negative information about homosexuals by the homosexualist dominated media]. If you dare to cry faggot, fairy, queer, at us, we will stab you in your cowardly hearts and defile your dead puny bodies [“hate crimes,” speech codes, fines]. We shall write poems of the love between men; we shall stage plays in which man openly caresses man [the play Bent and a multitude of others; the lesbian counterpart in the television show, Ellen]; we will make films about the love between heroic men which will replace the cheap, superficial, sentimental, insipid, juvenile, heterosexual infatuations presently dominating your cinema screens [Hollywood promotion of homosexual “love-making” and of the “gay rights” agenda in movies and television].

We shall sculpt statues of beautiful young men, of bold athletes which will be placed in your parks, your squares, your plazas [public funding of homosexual pornography by the National Endowment for the Arts, National Public Broadcasting Service]. The museums of the world will be filled only with the paintings of graceful, naked lads. Our writers will make love between men fashionable and de rigeur, and we will succeed because we are adept at setting styles [invention of “gay-speak” — “gay,” “homophobia,” “diversity,” “sexual orientation”].

We will eliminate heterosexual liaisons through usage of the devices of wit and ridicule which we are skilled in employing. We will unmask the powerful homosexuals who masquerade as heterosexuals [outing]. You will be shocked and frightened when you learn that your presidents and their sons, your industrialists, your senators, your mayors, your generals, your athletes, your film stars, your television personalities, your civic leaders, your priests are not the safe, familiar bourgeois, heterosexual figures you assumed them to be.

We are everywhere [a commonly used bumper-sticker]; we have infiltrated your ranks [strategic “surprise” announcements by “conservative” homosexuals, e.g. Mel White, former ghostwriter for Christian leaders]. Be careful when you speak of homosexuals because we are always among you; we may be sitting across the desk from you; we may be sleeping in the same bed with you. There will be no compromises. We are not middle class weaklings.

Highly intelligent, we are the natural aristocrats of the human race, and steely-minded aristocrats never settle for less [Brand/Friedlander, Fuehrer principle]. Those who oppose us will be exiled [the “Fems”]. We shall raise vast, private armies, as Mishima did, to defeat you [Rossbach and Roehm, Frederick the Great]. We shall conquer the world because warriors inspired by and banded together by homosexual love and honor are invincible as were the ancient Greek soldiers [Plato's Banquet ].



The family unit — spawning ground of lies, betrayals, mediocrity, hypocrisy and violence — will be abolished [homosexual “marriage” and adoption]. The family unit, which only dampens imagination and curbs free will, must be eliminated [Plato's Republic]. Perfect boys will be conceived and grown in the genetic laboratory. They will be bonded together in communal setting, under the control and instruction of homosexual savants [Sparta].

All churches who condemn us will be closed [attacks on the McIlhennys, St. Patrick’s Cathedral]. Our only gods are handsome young men. We adhere to a cult of beauty, moral and esthetic. All that is ugly and vulgar and banal will be annihilated [Kummerlings]. Since we are alienated from middle-class heterosexual co