Sen. Marco Rubio Marco Antonio RubioFlorida senators pushing to keep Daylight Savings Time during pandemic Hillicon Valley: DOJ indicts Chinese, Malaysian hackers accused of targeting over 100 organizations | GOP senators raise concerns over Oracle-TikTok deal | QAnon awareness jumps in new poll Intelligence chief says Congress will get some in-person election security briefings MORE (R-Fla.) on Monday knocked Democrats over the meaning of a "compromise" amid stalled negotiations to reopen the government, saying that compromise for Democrats "means when 3 or 4 Reps vote with the Dems."

Rubio, who made the comment in a tweet, also questioned "what happened" to the "need to compromise."

ADVERTISEMENT

"The current Democratic position on shutdown is 'no compromise' & @POTUS unconditional surrender on border security. What happened to all the lectures from commentators about the need to compromise? I guess for them 'compromise' means when 3 or 4 Reps vote with the Dems," Rubio tweeted.

The current Democratic position on shutdown is “no compromise” & @POTUS unconditional surrender on border security.



What happened to all the lectures from commentators about the need to compromise?



I guess for them “compromise” means when 3 or 4 Reps vote with the Dems. — Marco Rubio (@marcorubio) January 14, 2019

There have been few indications that the ongoing shutdown is nearing an end, with Democrats and Republicans still at odds over President Trump Donald John TrumpHR McMaster says president's policy to withdraw troops from Afghanistan is 'unwise' Cast of 'Parks and Rec' reunite for virtual town hall to address Wisconsin voters Biden says Trump should step down over coronavirus response MORE's demand for a wall along the southern border.

Democrats have vowed not to approve any funding for the wall, while Trump has said he won't sign a bill to fund the government that doesn't include at least $5 billion for the wall.

The shutdown over the weekend became the longest in history and is now in its 24th day.

Trump has threatened to declare a national emergency to begin construction of the wall, though recently he has appeared to back away from that idea as lawmakers have warned of the likelihood that it would be met with an immediate legal challenge.