Remember when the liberal media hollered when candidate Donald J. Trump refused to say if he’d honour the election results?

Now the shoe’s on the other foot. But who’s keeping, or rather counting, score? Well, biggest loser Hillary Clinton, aided and abetted by little loser Green Party candidate Jill Stein, who earned a teeny-weeny less than 1% of the vote.

You see liberals, amongst whose company I include Stein, just can’t accept what was unexpected in their liberal world order of fake news and phony polls — that Trump won! Recently, liberal election security experts speculated that the election could have been hacked by Russia’s cyber malware in the predictably Democratic states of Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania, which helped Trump win.

So Stein, who many voters never knew was a presidential candidate, ran with this conspiracy and started a costly $7-million recount crusade in those states, despite the fact that the experts and Hillary’s campaign don’t think this counting exercise will change anything.

In fact, one of the chief instigators of this recount movement, J. Alex Halderman, University of Michigan computer science professor, conceded as much.

“Were this year’s deviations from the pre-election polls the results of cyberattack? Probably not,” Halderman said. “I believe that the most likely explanation is that the polls were systematically wrong, rather than that the election was hacked. But I don’t believe that either one of these seemingly unlikely explanations is overwhelmingly more likely than the other.”

This guy’s opinion sounds about as solid as Jello.

Yet, last-ditch-effort grasping at votes to make herself politically relevant again, Hillary grabbed onto Jill’s pant legs.

Marc Elias, Hillary’s campaign counsel, wrote this in a post on Medium:

“Because we had not uncovered any actionable evidence of hacking or outside attempts to alter the voting technology, we had not planned to exercise this option ourselves, but now that a recount has been initiated in Wisconsin, we intend to participate in order to ensure the process proceeds in a manner that is fair to all sides.”

Like Trump tweeted Nov. 27:

“Hillary Clinton conceded the election when she called me just prior to the victory speech and after the results were in. Nothing will change.”

Hillary Clinton conceded the election when she called me just prior to the victory speech and after the results were in. Nothing will change — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 27, 2016

In her concession speech given nearly 10 hours after Trump won (because Hillary didn’t have the guts to face America), she said:

“We have to accept the results and look to the future, Donald Trump is going to be our president. We owe him an open mind and the chance to lead.”

Instead of making it about America, Hillary is again wasting other people’s money for her own political enrichment, despite the fact her campaign staff admits there’s no way recounting 107,000 votes will change the results.

During the last debate between the two, Hillary shuddered at Trump’s delay in answering if he would honour the results of the election.

“That is not the way our democracy works. Been around for 240 years. We’ve had free and fair elections. We’ve accepted the outcomes when we may not have liked them, and that is what must be expected of anyone standing on a debate stage during a general election. ... I, for one, am appalled that somebody who is the nominee of one of our two major parties would take that kind of position,” lectured Hillary.

Apparently, in her life-long run for the White House, Hillary Clinton only believed our democracy was worth upholding and honouring if she was the winner. That’s exactly why she was the biggest loser — voters could see through her decades of political B.S. and they rejected it.

— Wright is author of the book Con Job: How Democrats Gave Us Crime, Sanctuary Cities, Abortion Profiteering, and Racial Division

@gopblackchick