I’m not a conspiracy theorist; I’m a conspiracy analyst.

Gore Vidal

Idiots who declare that conspiracies don’t take place are too daffy to entertain, but they certainly can be entertaining. Some of the most amusing conversations I’ve had, for example, have been with ardent Pecksniffian “skeptics” (read “dolts”) who disdainfully dismiss my book Watergate: The Hoax as a “conspiracy theory”—uniformly without having read it. I merely ask them what they think happened in Watergate, and they immediately, inevitably, invariably, reel off the “Official Story”—which of course is that Richard Nixon somehow masterminded a secret conspiracy (they don’t use the word) to have a group of people break into the Democratic National Committee (DNC) offices at the Watergate to photograph documents inside the DNC offices, or to plant electronic bugs inside to spy on the Democrats, or both (they usually aren’t sure), which Nixon’s people did (they claim), but then the group of people who were in on Nixon’s secret plan got caught when they tried to break in a second time. Uniformly, these people telling me this see no irony at all in what they have just said. I keep a good poker face.

And I ask them to cite one piece of material evidence to support their claims—just one. Even a tiny scrap. And they can’t. And I ask them who actually ordered the “first break-in” at the Watergate, when the bugs were supposedly planted. And they cannot answer the question. (The correct answer is that nobody did, because there never was a “first break-in” at all.) And I ask them how many bugs, exactly, did James McCord plant inside the DNC headquarters, and where. They can’t answer. Ever. (That’s because the exact number of planted bugs was zero.) I ask them if they have seen any of the photographs of documents that the burglars took inside the DNC, and I ask if they can show those photographs to me. They haven’t seen any, and they can’t show any to me. Ever. (That’s because no such photos exist.)

And ultimately, inevitably, invariably, I rip their own “conspiracy theory” to strips and tatters. Which proves conclusively that they never objected to a “conspiracy theory” at all; they objected to someone challenging their own blindly accepted “conspiracy theory” that had been spoon-fed to them by the very government that created it. The government’s “Official Story” of Watergate is malicious and ridiculous fiction created by the Central Intelligence Agency, and it shreds like wet toilet paper the moment anybody with an ounce of probity and rational thought truly inspects it, instead of accepting it with the fervent fanaticism of religion. It is nothing whatsoever but a “conspiracy theory”—and a shoddy dime-novel one at that.

All of the current socially saturated antagonism to and ridicule of “conspiracy theories” was created by the CIA itself as part of its own self-protection propaganda. Now, why would that be? The answer should be blatantly obvious: Because every single thing that the CIA ever engages in, anywhere in the world, is, by definition, a conspiracy. So why would you ever, for even a moment, suffer a fool who denies that conspiracies exist, when the US government provably, inarguably spends literally billions of dollars every year (using that conspiracy-denying fool’s tax dollars) for the sole purpose of creating and carrying out secret conspiracies?

We have exactly the same situation right now, today, as in Watergate: The CIA conspired with others, within and without our own government, to destroy and overthrow a duly elected President of the United States, and has accused the target of the conspiracy of having committed a conspiracy, this time with Russia.

And the CIA is using the exact same tactics, methods, and modus operandi as they used in Watergate. That’s why I’m doing this series. Let’s get to it, shall we?

When we parted at the end of Part E of this series, we were on an airport tarmac, like Bogey and Bergman in Casablanca—except we were on the tarmac of the Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport in Arizona. It was Monday, 27 June 2016. Bruce Ohr‘s boss, Attorney General Loretta Lynch, had touched down in an airplane there, and had held a private on-plane meeting for 20 or 30 minutes with Bill Clinton, who just happened to be there at the same airport, and just happened to find out she was there. And all they talked about was grandchildren and fishing or tatting or something.

Nah, I’m kidding about that last part. That’s the lie they told about what they were doing in their hoped-to-be-clandestine rendezvous (but they got busted by a nosy local reporter). What they almost certainly were doing instead was poring over the salacious “golden showers” dossier document about Donald Trump. Just three day’s before the airport meeting, on Friday, 24 June 2016, MI6 agent Christopher Steele had sent the “pee dossier” report, air-couriered from London, into the waiting sweaty hands of the scummy “anything-for-a-buck” CIA tool Glenn Simpson in Washington, DC, who had hired Steele to manufacture the fictional filth. If you believe that a copy of that salacious document had not gone immediately from Simpson to his employee (and CIA operative) Nellie Ohr, and then from her hands immediately to the hands of her husband Bruce Ohr—an assistant deputy attorney general directly working for Lynch—and then from his grimy hands directly into the hands of Loretta Lynch, then you probably believe there were bugs in the Watergate and there are fairies under toadstools.

In the real world, though, all you have to do is draw one perfectly reasonable conclusion, and then everything that is about to come rushing at you in a seemingly random confusion will make perfect sense. In fact, if you’ll give it a moment’s thought, you will find it ridiculous that it could be otherwise. That perfectly reasonable conclusion is this: By this date we’re launching from, Monday, 27 June 2016, Attorney General Loretta Lynch, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, CIA Director John Brennan, Greg Vogle—director of the CIA’s dirty National Clandestine Service—and FBI Director James Comey all had copies of the first “dossier” memo from Christopher Steele, which contained the “golden showers” filthy fiction about Donald Trump, and which had been written one week earlier, on Monday, 20 June 2016.

There. That wasn’t so hard, was it? Hold on to that thought tightly, because without it, all that’s coming next may feel like walking into a spinning propeller.

Four days later, on Friday, 1 July 2016, the sewage merchant Christopher Steele in London sent a somewhat cryptic email to his dear friend Bruce Ohr—who worked directly for Loretta Lynch: “I am seeing [REDACTED] in London next week to discuss ongoing business.” That’s what makes it cryptic: that “[REDACTED]” part. But mark it well, and mark this date, because very soon we will find out more about who Christopher Steele was going to meet with in London the following week. Stay tuned …

Meanwhile, on the same day—just four days after her airport tête-à-tête with Bill Clinton—on Friday, 1 July 2016, Loretta Lynch announced publicly that she “would accept the recommendation of the Midyear investigative and prosecutorial team regarding whether to charge” Hillary Clinton—the term “Midyear” referring to the FBI investigation into Clinton’s use of a private server as Secretary of State.

On the very same day, FBI agent Peter Strzok texted to his illicit lover, FBI attorney Lisa Page: “The timing looks like hell, will appear to be choreographed.” (Gee, ya think, Peter?) Lisa Page texted back, insightfully, it seems, if sarcastically, about Loretta Lynch: “It’s a real profile in courage since she knows no charges will be brought.”

Let’s back the tape up and play that again: “She knows no charges will be brought.”

One more time, please, and turn up the volume:

“She knows no charges will be brought.”

Oh. Yeah, that’s what I thought you said. Of course, there’s damn-little-to-no doubt that Loretta Lynch had fingered and dog-eared her copy of the filthy “golden showers” document from Steele, and was confident that with that kind of dirt, Donald Trump could be brought down if and when needed. But even given that, there was a little bit of problem with Lynch already knowing that “no charges” would be brought against Hillary Clinton. Here’s what that problem was:

On the very next day, Saturday, 2 July 2016, FBI agent Peter Strzok did the first and only interview of Hillary Clinton in the “Midyear” investigation of her use of a private server. <Blink> Yes. You’re right. That means that the Attorney General of the United States, Loretta Lynch, somehow knew that “no charges” would be brought against Hillary Clinton before Clinton was interviewed by the FBI.

There is one, and only one, possible explanation: At all relevant times, Loretta Lynch had been specifically and expressly informed by FBI Director James Comey that he was going to exonerate Hillary Clinton of any criminal liability, and that he already had written his speech exonerating her, which Lynch had read. No matter how allergic to “conspiracy theories” you might be, no matter how you attempt to slice, dice, chop, mince, or puree any of it, there is not even one other possible explanation of these facts in their correct sequence. And that means that Loretta Lynch and James Comey—at the time the highest law-enforcement and judiciary officials in the nation—are both bare-faced amoral liars who have lied under oath, and who both used the force and power of their offices to attempt to rig a presidential election for one candidate and against another. Their own actions were criminal.

But don’t attempt even to pause and take a breath at that recognition, because only three days later—the instant that the 4th of July holiday was over—on Tuesday, 5 July 2016, FBI Director James Comey went on national television and did exactly what the Attorney General Loretta Lynch already knew he was going to do, something he had no lawful right or authority to do: He cleared Hillary Clinton of any criminal liability for patently criminal acts by declaring, without any foundation, the following:

Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. … As a result, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to Justice our view that no charges are appropriate in this case.

Of course “the Department of Justice,” in the person of Attorney General Loretta Lynch <Spit!> had already preemptively made the “final decision” on this matter by publicly stating days earlier that she would abide by whatever Comey said—and that’s because Loretta Lynch and James Comey knowingly had conspired to effect this exact plan and outcome.

And on the very same day, Tuesday, 5 July 2016, sewage merchant and covert MI6 operative (but I repeat myself) Christopher Steele allegedly met in London with an FBI agent from Rome named Michael Gaeta, who had flown to London just for the occasion. Does the name sound familiar? If you have been following this series, it should, because I brought up Michael Gaeta in both Part A and Part B of this series as someone who possibly had been instrumental in setting up a Rome meeting between useful idiot George Papadopoulos and the mysterious Maltese professor Joseph Mifsud. (One recent report suggests that Mifsud seemed to disappear off the face of the Earth around the time Gaeta was scheduled for an interview with the House Intelligence Committee in Congress, lending some credence to my earlier analysis.)

It’s worth noting that in addition to being an FBI agent, Michael Gaeta was the assistant legal attaché at the United States Embassy in Rome. I have mentioned before, and it bears repeating: All “ambassadors” and embassies everywhere in the world are covers and cut-outs for intelligence agencies and their operatives. Period. Anyone who tells you otherwise is probably an ambassador or an intelligence agent. (Or “liar,” to use the technical term.)

Michael Gaeta currently is virtually (pun unavoidable) a non-entity on the Internet. So Gaeta well may have been more than he appeared to be, but whatever his status, by Tuesday, 5 July 2016, he allegedly (stay tuned) had been given permission by the State Department’s Victoria Nuland to travel from Rome to London—on taxpayer dimes, natch—and meet with the sewage merchant Christopher Steele.

There are problems with this story, a host of problems that we’ll get to in a moment, but this also tells us something fairly certain, and it’s important: By no later than Friday, 1 July 2016, the gossipmonger Christopher Steele in London apparently already knew that Michael Gaeta was coming to London to meet with him. We have a strong indication of this, because Steele emailed Department of Justice official Bruce Ohr that day—see above—to announce the meeting, but the only available copy of that email redacts the name. For now, let’s go with the presumption that the redacted name was Michael Gaeta.

Now for the problems with the claim that the State Department’s Victoria Nuland approved this trip, and how, and when.

The first question is why? Why would the State Department approve this trip at all? It’s a thumping good question.

For the answer to that skull thumper, it’s instructive on more levels than I can easily count to turn to two of the CIA’s other mouthpieces, two inveterate hacks who probably would sell their soul to carry the CIA’s sewage—if they had a soul between them. But like Woodward and Bernstein, that’s an unlikely proposition. Also like WoodStein, though, they have that gnarly knack for really awful bargain-basement pulp spy fiction, weaving in many of the CIA’s favorite psyops, so let’s be very quiet and reverent for a moment, and listen to David Corn (regrettably, the name is not my joke) and Michael Isikoff tell their breathless story of this incident from their book Russian Roulette:

Soon after sending Simpson the memo [the “Golden Showers” memo, on Friday, 24 June 2016], Steele made an unnerving suggestion: They should share this report with the FBI. … “I wouldn’t even know who to call,” Simpson said at one point. Steele replied, “Oh, I know who to call.” Finally, Simpson relented. … Steele was now free to tell the FBI. … Steele called Michael Gaeta, his FBI contact … . “I’ve got something you should see,” he said. “I can’t discuss it over the phone. You have to come here. Believe me, Mike, you have to come to London.” There were a few hoops Gaeta had to jump through. He was assigned to the U.S. embassy in Rome. The FBI checked with Victoria Nuland’s office at the State Department: Do you support this meeting? Nuland, having found Steele’s reports on Ukraine to have been generally credible, gave the green light. Within a few days, on July 5, Gaeta arrived and headed to Steele’s office near Victoria station. Steele handed him a copy of the report. Gaeta, a seasoned FBI agent, started to read. He turned white. For a while, Gaeta said nothing. Then he remarked, “I have to report this to headquarters.” … When the first Steele memo arrived in FBI headquarters that same week, it got the attention of the Bureau’s counterintelligence division.

Sometimes, I have to simply put my head down on my desk. A great weariness overcomes me at the contemplation of just how far we have sunk as a species that fetid crap like the above not only can get published, but that it can get heralded, lionized, in the so-called “mainstream media,” and lapped up as “journalism.” <Spit!> If it were packaged and sold for what it actually is—pulp spy fiction—no self-respecting human being would buy it. But by fraudulently claiming to be “journalists” writing “nonfiction,” dysfunctional cretins like these two hacks, Corn and Isikoff—or Cornikoff—can cram so much garbage into such a tiny space that it’s a wonder it doesn’t convert itself into a black hole and suck all of life and the universe right down into it. And maybe we’d better deconstruct it before it does.

In that humanitarian effort, first I’m going to pull a small section here from my article “The CIA Psyops of Watergate and Beyond” because the above quotation from Cornikoff is an exact, precise example of one of the CIA’s favorite psyops, this one:

CLOSED DOORS AND CLANDESTINE INTERACTION

A PSYOPS technique heavily relied upon in Watergate to create the conflicts and fictions … is alleged private, secret talks and meetings and activities between two, or a few, of the principal actors, with nothing more than their own assertions of what the subject and substance of such an interaction was. An almost inconceivable amount of what we know as Watergate is built on no more foundation, and it is no foundation at all. It often is pure fiction.

In most instances where we literally are forced to rely on the accounts of a small number of the co-conspirators interacting, one or more of the persons involved has known CIA background, connections, clearances, employment, or all four. The Watergate literature is so strewn with one-on-one encounters that the exceptions are easier to count than the instances.

That entire quote above from Corn and Isikoff about the Steele-Gaeta connection is nothing but a “closed doors and clandestine interaction” psyop. If you slipped on the muck and got sucked into it, don’t feel bad: The whole world fell for the CIA-WoodStein hoax that was Watergate. But this is far from the worst of it.

Because there’s this precious quote from the Cornikoff book: “The FBI checked with Victoria Nuland’s office at the State Department.” The FBI did? The entire FBI? WHO in the FBI? Peter Strzok? Bill Priestap? Andrew McCabe? James Comey? WHO? Well, you’ll wait until the end of time for the answer to that from these scum. Yet how could these “investigative journalists” <Spit!> possibly know that “the FBI checked” with anything or anybody without also knowing who at the FBI did the checking? Of course it’s impossible. So there are only two possibilities: Corn and Isikoff are bare-faced liars peddling fictions for the CIA, or they have willfully, knowingly withheld crucial information concerning WHO inside the FBI knew about Steele’s meeting with Gaeta at the time. Take your pick. Because we are nowhere near the worst of it yet.

See, David Corn, in writing this trash (or, more accurately, peddling the trash that the CIA told him to say) in Russian Roulette, above, is claiming forcefully along with Isikoff that the way the “pee memo” from Steele got to the FBI was by Michael Gaeta flying from Rome to London and getting a copy. That’s odd. It’s very odd indeed, because this same simian stenographer, David Corn, told a completely different story about it back on Halloween, 31 October 2016, in the rag Mother Jones (bold emphasis and names added, because in the article Corn did not reveal the names we now know):

This was, the former spy [Chrisopher Steele] remarks, “an extraordinary situation.” He regularly consults with US government agencies on Russian matters, and near the start of July on his own initiative—without the permission of the US company [Glenn Simpson, Fusion GPS] that hired him—he sent a report he had written for that firm to a contact at the FBI, according to the former intelligence officer [Steele] and his American associates [Glenn Simpson, Fusion GPS], who asked not to be identified. (He [Steele] declines to identify the FBI contact [which may or not have been Michael Gaeta].) The former spy [Steele] says he concluded that the information he had collected on Trump was “sufficiently serious” to share with the FBI.

Where even to start trying to pull apart the tarry taffy of contradictions? Let’s ease into it.

In the Halloween article version, Corn claims that Steele had contacted the FBI “without the permission” of Glenn Simpson/Fusion GPS. Yet Corn and Isikoff themselves said in their co-auhored book, quoted earlier above, that Simpson had “relented” and therefore Steele was “free to tell the FBI.”

Was Corn lying in his Halloween Mother Jones article, or did he lie in his book? It’s one or the other. Or will he try to pin the lies on the only two people he possibly could have gotten any of it from, Simpson and Steele?

Glenn Simpson himself said under oath in Congress that he specifically had given Christopher Steele approval to go to the FBI (bold emphasis added):

GLENN SIMPSON: So he [Steele] proposed to— He said we should tell the FBI … I questioned how we would do that … He said, “Don’t worry about that. I know the perfect person; I have a contact there; they’ll listen to me, they know who I am. I’ll take care of it.” I said okay. You know, I agreed.

So did Glenn Simpson lie under oath in Congress, or had he lied to David Corn earlier, claiming that he did not give Steele permission to contact the FBI? Somebody sure as hell is lying, and the nature of the lies is grim indeed, grim enough to reach to possible criminal liability. But I hate to have to tell you that this still is not the worst of it.

No, because in one place, the book, David Corn claims that an FBI agent and legal attaché of the United States, Michael Gaeta, flew from Rome to London (on taxpayers’ dimes) to pick up a filthy piece of salacious gossip about a presidential candidate of the United States from a foreign covert agent, Christopher Steele—but in another place, the Halloween article, the same David Corn claims that Christopher Steele sent that memo to his unnamed “contact at the FBI” (which may or may not have been Michael Gaeta).

It cannot possibly be both. This is yet another bloody-handprint of psyops of the CIA, specifically these, taken from the same article I quoted from above, “The CIA Psyops of Watergate and Beyond” :

CONTRADICTIONS TO CREATE CONFUSION

A time-honored and favorite intelligence technique for creating confusion is to supply two separate and contradictory accounts of what purportedly is the same event. The mind locks. It cannot be resolved. No certain truth can be reached about the time span of the event, because both contradictory accounts cannot be true. The mind is forced to make a choice between two accounts that might both be false, or to leave it unresolved, yet still attempt to link that enduring mystery to other claimed or actual events that depend on it, or that take place around it. The landscape of Watergate is littered with such mental traps. They work hand-in-hand with the next op:

CONTRADICTION BY MULTIPLE SOURCES: THE COMMONALITIES

One frequently used technique to spread a tremendous amount of confusion is to supply seemingly plausible accounts of the “same” events through different sources, with the varying accounts appearing at different times and in different places. A variation is to have several different accounts from one source, but told at different times. Each of the conflicting accounts has certain major commonly agreed-upon and sometimes true components. These are crucial to the fraud. The perceiver’s mind latches onto these common components they’ve heard about from “multiple sources,” and attempts to synthesize it all together into a cohesive whole, no matter how many details are at variance and odds with each other. The contradictory details most often are overlooked. That factor alone is the key to the success of the fraud.

But really, that’s still not the worst of it, because the worst of it is this: It may well have been neither. As usual with CIA-created gawdawful spy fiction, there is not a single scrap of hard evidence to prove any of these claims. That’s because fiction doesn’t leave a paper trail.

Somebody is lying. Is it Corn and Isikoff? Is it Steele and Simpson? If the latter, does that conclusively prove that Corn and Isikoff are such gullible and incompetent idiots that they shouldn’t be allowed anywhere near a word processor? The most likely correct answer by far is that all of them are lying. The most likely correct answer by far is that at all relevant times, from no later than Monday, 27 June 2016, Attorney General Loretta Lynch, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, CIA Director John Brennan, Greg Vogle—director of the CIA’s dirty National Clandestine Service—and FBI Director James Comey all had copies of the first “dossier” memo from Christopher Steele, which contained the “golden showers” filth about Donald Trump, and which had been written one week earlier, on Monday, 20 June 2016.

And that brings us back to something else that Cornikoff slipped up (badly) and said in their book, as quoted earlier: “When the first Steele memo arrived in FBI headquarters that same week [the week between Tuesday, 5 July and Friday, 8 July 2016], it got the attention of the Bureau’s counterintelligence division.”

Let’s back the tape up and hear that again: “When the first Steele memo arrived in FBI headquarters that same week [the week between Tuesday, 5 July and Friday, 8 July 2016], it got the attention of the Bureau’s counterintelligence division.”

Okay, one more time—and crank the volume up a bit:

“When the first Steele memo arrived in FBI headquarters that same week [the week between Tuesday, 5 July and Friday, 8 July 2016], it got the attention of the Bureau’s counterintelligence division.”

Wait: “counterintelligence division”? But— But that would mean that the head of the FBI’s Counterintelligence Division, Bill Priestap, would have had that “first Steele memo,” the infamous “golden showers” memo, absolutely no later than Friday, 8 July 2016. But it couldn’t possibly have been as late as that Friday, because if you’ll recall from the Cornikoff claims, three days earlier, on Tuesday, 5 July 2016, seasoned FBI agent Michael Gaeta supposedly “turned white” when he read it in London, and said dramatically, “I have to report this to headquarters.” (I know, I know; it’s just truly pathetic pulp spy fiction, staged like a grammar-school play, but that’s their story, which they imply came from Christopher Steele himself, so for now let’s go with this date.)

So that means that Gaeta would have immediately gotten that document to Priestap by the fastest means possible, probably by secure email, and that means that Bill Priestap had in his possession that “pee memo” by the same day that Comey exonerated Hillary Clinton: Tuesday, 5 July 2016.

And if Bill Priestap had it by then, it is absolutely necessary that Peter Strzok also had it by then, because Strzok, who worked directly under Priestap, was the Section Chief of the Counterespionage Division—that Twilight Zone “floating” job that was the go-between for the FBI liaison to the CIA—and this dossier memo had everything to do with alleged Russian espionage on American citizens. And it’s a 100-percent, all-in, put-the-baby’s-milk-money-on-the-table bet that if Peter Strzok had it, his adulterous girlfriend Lisa Page, counsel to then-Deputy Director of the FBI Andrew McCabe, knew all about it. And if any of them—Priestap, Strzok, or Page—knew about it, it’s a lead-pipe cinch that the FBI’s General Counsel James “Jim” Baker knew about it. (By the way, that name, “Jim Baker,” is another CIA “twosie,” and they are never accidental, but that’s another story.) All of them knew about the “golden showers” memo and likely had copies of it by no later than Tuesday, 5 July 2016.

Stop the presses. Stop the piano player. Stop the train. Stop, stop, stop.

This is not possible. Why? For one reason, because the man who was the Director of the FBI at the time, James Comey—and we know he would never lie, right?—told George Stephanopoulos in an interview that it was impossible:

STEPHANOPOULOS: Did [the dossier] trigger the FBI investigation in any way?

COMEY: No, in fact, as I said, the information that triggered it was the Papadopoulos information that came in late July. The FBI didn’t get any information that’s part of the so-called Steele dossier, as I understand it, until after that.

So, okay: somebody is definitely lying.

But, look, we have it on authority from “the very best people” in the realm of journalism <Spit!>, none other than the vaunted “paper of record,” The New York Times, that it was indeed weeks later after 5 July 2016 before Peter Strzok got his hands on it (emphasis added):

Christopher Steele, who was working as a private investigator hired by a firm working for a Trump opponent … provided the documents to an FBI contact in Europe on the same day as Mr. Comey’s news conference about Mrs. Clinton. It took weeks for this information to land with Mr. Strzok and his team.

It’s an awful shame that they don’t bother to explain why it would take “weeks” for the information to get to Strzok, but don’t despair, because Peter Strzok himself swore under oath in Congress—and he would never lie, right?—that the Steele dossier had nothing to do with the FBI later (um, weeks later) opening an investigation into the Trump campaign and “Russia collusion,” so it certainly is very convenient that the CIA’s Operation-Mockingbird mouthpiece The New York Times would gratuitously supply this “it took weeks” alibi for Strzok and friends. Of course, Strzok also refused to answer any questions about the “dossier” in his sworn congressional testimony, “on direction by the FBI”—and nobody anywhere, including in Congress, has ever been able to state any actual DATE OF WHEN THE FBI GOT HOLD OF THE STEELE DOSSIER OR ANY PART THEREOF.

That last statement ought to scare you to death. If it doesn’t, allow me now to introduce you further to one Victoria Nuland. Remember Victoria? If you have a nagging, lingering thought about Victoria Nuland and her part in all of this—after all, she was named by Corn and Isikoff, so she must be a “witness” to it, and she wouldn’t lie, right?—let’s revisit for a moment what Cornikoff said about her role in the drama, which purportedly was approving Michael Gaeta flying from Rome to London to have a meeting with sewage merchant Christopher Steele:

The FBI checked with Victoria Nuland’s office at the State Department: Do you support this meeting [Gaeta with Steele in London]? Nuland, having found Steele’s reports on Ukraine to have been generally credible, gave the green light.

Got all that? Any questions? “The FBI”(we don’t know who in the FBI) purportedly “checked with” Victoria Nuland about this meeting between Christopher Steele and Michael Gaeta—an FBI agent and a legal attaché (“It’s a floor wax and a dessert topping!”)—and she said it was just fine. It’s a tad disappointing to note that Cornikoff somehow manages to entirely skirt the issue of whether Nuland was told what the meeting was about in order for her to approve this expense and a trip to London—but let’s not nitpick.

So with that all firmly in mind, let’s find out what Victoria Nuland herself says about it all. First, I have to warn you that she claims that it happened not at the beginning of July, but in “the middle of July,” just in case your stomach is already a little queasy. Now let’s let her tell it, from her appearance on Face the Nation:

VICTORIA NULAND: Chris Steele … had a friend at the state department [Jonathan Winer, about whom more later in this series] … . Then in the middle of July when he was doing this other work and became concerned …

MARGARET BRENNAN: The dossier.

VICTORIA NULAND: The dossier. He passed two to four pages of short points of what he was finding, and our immediate reaction to that was, “This is not in our purview. This needs to go to the FBI, if there is any concern here that one candidate or the election as a whole might be influenced by the Russian federation. That’s something for the FBI to investigate.” And that was our reaction when we saw this. It’s not our— We can’t evaluate this.

<Blink> Back the tape up and play that again.

VICTORIA NULAND: The dossier. He passed two to four pages of short points of what he was finding, and our immediate reaction to that was, “This is not in our purview. This needs to go to the FBI.”

Louder, please:

VICTORIA NULAND: The dossier. He passed two to four pages of short points of what he was finding, and our immediate reaction to that was, “This is not in our purview. This needs to go to the FBI.”

But Cornikoff told us—and they wouldn’t lie, would they?—that Nuland is the one who SENT the FBI agent to get the damned thing in the first place, and— Oh, never mind.

Have you had enough yet of the lies and contradictory claims? Do you begin to feel a little as though somebody is rapidly waving their hands about two inches from your eyes—or possibly as though you have walked into a spinning propeller? Allow me to gently recall to your attention what I gently suggested earlier in this article, and I quote myself:

All you have to do is draw one perfectly reasonable conclusion, and then everything that is about to come rushing at you in a seemingly random confusion will make perfect sense. In fact, if you’ll give it a moment’s thought, you will find it ridiculous that it could be otherwise. That perfectly reasonable conclusion is this: By … Monday, 27 June 2016, Attorney General Loretta Lynch, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, CIA Director John Brennan, Greg Vogle—director of the CIA’s dirty National Clandestine Service—and FBI Director James Comey all had copies of the first “dossier” memo from Christopher Steele, which contained the “golden showers” filth about Donald Trump, and which had been written one week earlier, on Monday, 20 June 2016.

That’s right: ALL of this crap from CIA mouthpieces David Corn, Michael Isikoff, Glenn Simpson, and Christopher Steel, ALL the made-up garbage fiction about Michael Gaeta “turning white” on Tuesday, 5 July 2016 in London, ALL the CIA-generated sewage about Strzok not having gotten the dossier memos for “weeks” after that date, ALL the impossible contradictions—ALL of it is to accomplish one thing, and one thing only: to create a completely fictional “reality” to hide the fact that by no later than Monday, 27 June 2016, Attorney General Loretta Lynch, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, CIA Director John Brennan, Greg Vogle—director of the CIA’s dirty National Clandestine Service—and FBI Director James Comey all had copies of the first “dossier” memo from Christopher Steele, which contained the “golden showers” filth about Donald Trump, and which had been written one week earlier, on Monday, 20 June 2016.

It doesn’t take a leap of faith, or of logic, or of even fundamental common sense to realize that this means that every single person depicted and listed in the illustration at the top of this article—minimally—had access to, and almost certainly a copy, of the filthy, salacious, fictional “Golden Showers” memo. Here’s the list of The Dirty 13: Hillary Clinton, Loretta Lynch, Bruce Ohr, Glenn Simpson, Nellie Ohr, Greg Vogle, John Brennan, James Clapper, Peter Strzok, Bill Priestap, James “Jim” Baker, James Comey, and Barack Obama.

And every last one of the scummy criminals has lied about it, either overtly, or covertly by omission: lied, lied, lied, lied, lied.

Why? Because if that truth ever got out, it would prove beyond the last shred of doubt a criminal conspiracy among these people to frame, smear, and overthrow, if necessary, a presidential candidate, who became a President Elect, and who then became a duly elected and sworn-in President of the United States. And that is precisely what took place.

These are serious, deadly serious, crimes, much of it carried out under color of law.

I pray you are beginning to get some glimpse, however disturbing it might be (and should be), of just how debased, degraded, corrupt, debauched, amoral, and criminal these people are, and how the CIA regularly plays you, the American people, for utter and complete fools, using its mooing herd of sewage carriers that crawl around inside the gates of our own government, and that run loose on the streets in the “mainstream media” <Spit!>. Such is the arrogance of a perfect tyranny of knowledge that can be kept from you behind the massive lie of “national security,” and that is what makes it a perfect tyranny of power, which is exactly what the CIA was created to be. [Please see Part E of this series for more on that. —Ed.]

The really bad news is that we haven’t managed to even get past Tuesday, 5 July 2016 in all of this. I vow I will pick things up right here soon in Part G of this series, and will walk with you through all the spinning propeller blades they can throw at us, and even the jet blasts that follow. For now, though, there’s only so much of these scummy criminals I can take in a sitting. Till we meet again: “Here’s looking at you, kid.”

Ashton Gray

Fiction doesn’t leave a paper trail

Don’t miss Ashton Gray’s staggering 600-page CIA exposé Watergate: The Hoax, which one seasoned trial lawyer has called “a forensic tour de force.” The exact same kinds of tactics and methods are being used by the CIA and FBI, right now, today—still using their same Operation Mockingbird mouthpieces in “mainstream media” to package and sell their lies. Buy and read Watergate: The Hoax today, and recommend it to everyone you know, love, and care about!

Watergate: The Hoax is available now

at Amazon, iBooks and Barnes & Noble.

Order it today!

Rewrite history with the truth!

And be among the first to buy and own Ashton Gray’s revolutionary work Created Equal: The Greatest Lie, a merciless assault on 300 years of fatuously false philosophy, psychology, sociology, and politics! Order now for only $4.99 at Amazon.com.

Available as Kindle and trade paperback; also available at other fine book retailers.

Join the new cultural revolution! Buy and read Created Equal: The Greatest Lie!