Tom Hayes: For GOP Congress is now the opposite of Progress







Thomas Hayes is an entrepreneur, journalist, and political analyst who contributes regularly to a host of web sites on topics ranging from economics and politics to culture and community.





It would be laughable if it wasn't such obvious partisan grand-standing. The minority party wants to have their cake, and eat it, too. After years ofexercising rock-solid legislative control with Congressional majorities they're finding the rules aren't as fun when the other guys are in charge.The GOP leadersthey want the President to,and,But along the way he'd better compromise with them. The latest example comes from the stage of international relations. The President's supposed to represent indecision in Copenhagen, courtesy of the 7 GOP members of the Senate's Environment and Public Works Committee.These esteemed Senators have threatened a boycott of planned work sessions - get this - to delay the start of the committee debate. We're not even talking about a vote, they don't even want to talk about the bill yet. Progress isn't supposed to be the opposite of Congress, is it? Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) , who chairs the committee, said,because she hopes Republicans will,She's extending the deadline for Republicans to notify her of amendments they're considering, and canceled the Tuesday session so Environmental Protection Agency staff could come appear before EPW to answer technical questions, even. She's bending over backwards to craft a bi-partisan bill and get a committee vote before the Copenhagen Climate talks.But she doesn't have to. All the posturing about costs, and how acting too quickly will surely be a burden on business, are echoes of the tired, familiar litany that the GOP always recites whenever their lobbyists haven't blessed a bill.Even if the 7 Republicans don't show up the committee still has the necessary quorum to conduct business. It only takes 10 votes to move the bill forward to the floor, and 12 of the 19 members are Democrats. Obviously Senator Boxer and the administration know this simple math.Evidently the decision has been to to compromise on some of the procedures, and possibly even policies, but to set an agenda that shows American values in the court of world opinion - yet the GOP chooses to play obstructive games while complaining that Obama doesn't exhibit leadership in world affairs.I know that sort of thing can be spun into indignant rants by extreme pundits selecting judicious sound-bites. Yet, when Swedish Prime Minister, Fredrik Reinfeldt, has called on China to set a tougher target of cutting greenhouse gas emissions after 2020 as its part of the international agreement to be negotiated in Copenhagen, shouldn't the U.S. Congress step back from the rhetoric and help set the stage for U.S. participation?The facts are stark; the U.S. can lead in Copenhagen, or we can trail along behind petulantly like a spoiled brat.