With the success of their 1999 animated feature Tarzan it’s no surprise that the House of Mouse would bring the Ape Man to television, as part of their Disney’s One Saturday Morning lineup, but what was a little surprising is how good it was. Often times Disney direct to video sequels were of less than stellar quality, Beauty and the Beast: The Enchanted Christmas being a prime example of this, but when it came to their animated televisions shows they tended to do a better job. The 1998 Hercules series ran two seasons, and was far more interesting than the theatrically released movie it was based on, and in the case of Disney’s The Legend of Tarzan they really struck gold. When adapting the Disney movie into a series format the writers had to tackle two key problems; first being that they couldn’t stray too far from how the characters were depicted in their hit movie, and secondly none of the voice actors returned for this small screen venture. The second point turned out to be no problem at all, as they managed to get a roster of great voice talent to fill out their cast, but in keeping with the way Disney depicted these classic characters in the past, by looking at their feature films, it was less than ideal situation, especially if one was trying to faithfully adapt the stories of Tarzan by Edgar Rice Burroughs.

Of course no one should ever expect a Disney produced project to stay true to the source material, this is the same studio that made Hercules mortal by inept poisoning, instead of it being because Zeus just couldn’t keep it in his pants, and so a Disney Tarzan was never going to be the pulp adventure hero that Burroughs penned. Like the 1999 movie this series will have a Jane Porter (Olivia d’Abo), who is decidedly British for some arcane reason, and a Tarzan (Michael T. Weiss) who spends much of his time scrambling around on all fours, and speaking in somewhat halting English. Like in the 1976 Filmation series Tarzan, Lord of the Jungle this Ape Man will not be a killer, not even in self-defence, but he will defeat most enemies with the strength of his mighty limbs, and luckily enough for the Disney writers by the 1990s Standards and Practices had lessened some of the restrictions on what violence could be included in a show aimed at kids, and so Tarzan isn’t forced to spend all his time dodging opponents as he did in the Filmation series, he’s able to properly fight back.

Though a knife would certainly come in handy here.

What stands out most when watching Disney’s The Legend of Tarzan is the quality of the animation, once again we are treated to Tarzan beautifully surfing the jungle like and Extreme Sports God, and nobody does character designs better than the people at Disney. As I mentioned earlier the writers of this show were rather hamstrung by the feature movie, and so we get a slightly less civilized jungle man than what Burroughs had depicted in his books; Jane and Tarzan’s relationship in the first few books was fraught with misunderstandings and abductions, opposed to the Disney movie where they just kind of fell in love and decided to get married. The animated series picks up shortly after the movie ended, with Jane now blissfully married to Tarzan and living with him in a fabulous treehouse (a treehouse more in keeping with the Johnny Weissmuller Tarzan films). Sharing their life in the jungle is Jane’s absent minded father Professor Archimedes Q. Porter (Jeff Bennett), the cowardly elephant friend Tantor (Jim Cummings), and Terk (April Winchell) Tarzan’s female gorilla pal, and for those of you thought that the Rosie O’Donnell Terk in the movie was annoying it’s increased tenfold for the show. They have a running gag where Tantor is constantly falling on her, but instead of it killing her, as it would most living creatures, it just provides bad comedy.

Tantor and Terk, the Two Stooges.

A Few Words on the Language Barrier: One element that really bothered me, while watching this show, was the use of talking animals; Terk, Tantor, and all the gorillas seem to be speaking colloquial English, but when visitors come to the jungle they ask about Tarzan’s amazing ability to speak to the animals. We apparently are supposed to assume that Tarzan taught Jane and her father to speak the language of the beast, yet at times we see Jane correcting Terk’s grammar on occasion. So are they speaking English or is Jane even a grammar Nazi in ape language? Even stranger is that we often see Tarzan, Jane and even Terk going, “Ook, ook.” When speaking to monkeys. There is just no consistency on display here, but then again I’m probably over thinking what’s basically a show aimed at kids.

In my review of Filmation’s Tarzan, Lord of the Jungle I mentioned how impressed I was that they had managed to use elements straight out of the books – not completely faithful but the spirit was there – and now in the case of Disney’s The Legend of Tarzan we see even more characters from the books brought to life, sadly in most cases it seems like simple name dropping, and I doubt the writers of the show did more than glance at the chapter headings. One classic Tarzan location that appears in both the Filmation series and the Disney one is the lost city of Opar, and strangely enough both shows get it completely wrong, in the books Opar was a lost outpost of Atlantis, populated by beautiful women and hideous ape like men, and ruling over them was their queen and high priestess La. Any who fell into her clutches would quickly find themselves sacrificed to the Sun God, unless of course you were Tarzan because then you’d capture the heart of La, spurn her advances, and then loot the city’s vaults of the gold that were hidden there. In the Filmation series Opar was seen as an abandoned ruin, no hot tempered priestess to be seen, and certainly no spurning going on, but in the Disney series we do have Queen La (Diahann Carroll), but she’s no Atlantean priestess, instead she is a sorceress with an army of leopard men.

Note: Her leopard men are not to be confused with the sadistic cult in the book Tarzan and the Leopard Men, as these aren’t men in costumes but animals transformed by magic into bipedal monstrosities.

Queen La herself is not a descendant of fabled Atlantis, for we learn that she was once a member of the local Waziri tribe who was forced out due to her evil practitioning of forbidden magic, and it’s her magic staff that allows her to transform animals into humanoids, as well as turn humans into animals. She can even animate giant stone statues to do her bidding. Like in the book The Return of Tarzan La falls in “love” with Tarzan, and when he tells the Queen that he loves Jane things get a bit dicey. In the episode Tarzan and the Leopard Men Rebellion the titular leopard men kidnap Jane, so that she can become their new queen and free them from being the abominations La had turned them into, but when the magic staff is broken the leopard men revert to being just plain old leopards, and La herself turns to dust. Of course that isn’t the end of her evil ways, for in the episode Tarzan and the Return of La, the evil queen’s spirit manages to possess Jane. The book version of La is vastly more sympathetic, almost a tragic figure whose love for Tarzan is her only escape from her horrible life, but the Disney version of La is equally great in a totally different manner. This is the one thing Disney changed that I could get completely behind.

Also their version of Queen La is totally hot.

That she was once a member of the Waziri is bit of a strange and unnecessary change, but then again this show’s version of the Waziri is nothing like in the books. In the books the Waziri tribe were Tarzan’s closest allies, and often provided numerical back-up if Tarzan found himself against enemies of superior numbers, but the show’s change to making them just a neighbouring tribe is probable a way to distance themselves from the racists overtones that Burroughs was sometimes accused of. In the books Tarzan often referred to the Waziri as “His children” and one could certainly take a white father figure commanding a group of blacks to be, if not racist, a little patronizing. So that change I will give Disney a pass on, but what I don’t understand is the name dropping of name Muviro, featured in the episode Tarzan and the Eagle’s Feather. In this episode Muviro (Kevin Michael Richardson) is a jealous Waziri warrior who hates Tarzan, and tries to steal a woman betrothed to a fellow tribesman, but in the books Muviro is the leader of the Waziri, and next to Paul D’Arnot is Tarzan’s closest friend. Why Disney would pick that particular name to make into an enemy for Tarzan is beyond me, why not just make one up out of whole cloth, why besmirch such a great character from the books?

This is something they did in the movie as well, where they gave the head villain the name Clayton, when in fact Clayton is actually Tarzan’s real surname, and this kind of thing drives me crazy. Speaking of enemies the show does borrow one of Tarzan’s most notorious enemies from the books, the nefarious Nikolas Rokoff (Ron Perlman), whose numerous plots in the books constantly threatened Tarzan and his family.

Nicholas Rokoff and his henchman Alexis Paulvitch.

These two villains first appeared in the book The Return of Tarzan, and they crossed paths with our hero when he foiled a plot they had to discredit a Count, and later Tarzan foiled their espionage plans when the tried to obtain classified military information. Then in the next book The Beasts of Tarzan Nicholas Rokoff kidnaps Tarzan’s wife and child, which puts him right at the top of any villainy list. But what is the dastardly Rokoff doing in this Disney version? He’s in Africa looking for pirate treasure, and when he learns that the location of the buried treasure is fraught with danger he kidnaps Jane to force Tarzan to retrieve the treasure. So this Disneyfied Rokoff isn’t quite as well rounded and evil as his book counterpart, he’s more from the Snidely Whiplash School of Villainy.

Queen La and Rokoff are not the only villains to make the transition from the books to the show, we have the ape Tublat (Keith David), who was a rival ape to Kerchak’s rule, and One Punch Mulligan, the World’s Heavyweight Champion, who visits Africa as a publicity stunt. When Tarzan accidentally knocks him down with “one punch” the fighter does everything he can to get a re-match with the Ape Man, but aside from the character’s name there isn’t much from the short story, collected in the book Tarzan and the Castaways, to found in this animated version. In story “Tarzan and the Champion“ One Punch Mulligan comes to Africa to hunt and bag some trophies, but after machine gunning down any wildlife within range of his guns, he finds an angry Tarzan on his trail. Unlike his animated counterpart the Mulligan in the book learns the value of all life, including that of animals, and he becomes Tarzan’s friend. In the episode One Punch Mulligan he’s just a blowhard that leaves in disgrace after being accidentally punched out by both Tarzan and Terk.

Another strange change is that of Samuel T. Philander (Craig Fergusson), character who in the book was Professor Porters trusted assistant, but in this show he’s his academic rival. Philander is depicted as a lying cheat, whose achievements all stem from stealing the researcher of Jane’s father, and who has come to Africa in the hopes of discovering what Professor Porter is working on now and stealing that as well. You couldn’t get further from his character in the book unless you had him try and kill Professor Porter, oh wait he does that as well in this show. In the episode Tarzan and the Hidden World Professor Porter convinces Tarzan to lead him to the subterranean world of Pellucidar, where Philander tries to trap Porter and friends in this land of killer dinosaurs, while making off with the proof of their existence. As in the Filmation series you can access Pellucidar by a crater like hole located near Tarzan’s home, but unlike the Tarzan at the Earth’s Core, or even the Filmation version, there are no Mahars or ape-like Sagoths. The Disney version doesn’t even give us cave men.

Tarzan does get to fight some dinosaurs though.

Disney’s The Legend of Tarzan isn’t just a collection of re-worked characters from the books, there are quite a slew of original characters populating this series, and most of them are pretty fun. Renard Dumont (René Auberjonois) is introduced as an opportunistic French proprietor, who opens up a trading post near Tarzan and Jane’s home, at first the relationship between our heroes and Dumont is a bit antagonistic, but later they become friends and the Frenchmen even helps Tarzan out of a jam or two. Then there is the villainous Lt. Colonel Staquait (Jim Cummings), whose draconian methods put him at odds with Tarzan. He who orders the burning of a village that contains women and children, and when two of his soldiers refuse the order, and flee execution, he tracks the pair into Tarzan’s neighbourhood.

“Sadly my moustache is too pencil thin to twirl.”

The two soldiers he tracks down in the episode titled The Fugitives are easily my favorite additions to the Tarzan cast, Hugo and Hooft (Dave Thomas and Joe Flaherty) are clear parodies of Bob Hope and Bing Crosby from the popular Road to… movie series. Though the characters don’t quite resemble the legendary comic duo, Thomas and Flaherty do pitch perfect impressions of them. Hugo and Hooft quickly become regulars on the show, and they bring some nice comic moments, opposed to the terrible ones provided by Terk. Though their appearances makes one wonder why we never got a Bob Hope/Bing Crosby meet Tarzan movie.

Comic Legends meet Jungle God.

One of the major differences from the Disney cartoon and the books, and certainly from the Filmation series – where she is completely absent – is the predominate use of Jane Porter. Aside from using Jane as a damsel in distress Burroughs often found himself at a loss as to what to do with her, even going so far as to dabble with the idea of killing her off, but in Disney’s The Legend of Tarzan Jane is front and center with her man through all their adventures. Not only does Jane appear in every episode she is most often integral to the story, and even saves the day once and awhile. How well she is portrayed in this series makes me almost forgive them for making her British.

Jane looking even hotter while possessed by the spirit of Queen La.

Disney’s The Legend of Tarzan is not a faithful representation of the Tarzan stories told by Burroughs, drop any as many characters from the books as you like and it’s still not going to be the boisterous pulp adventures from the original stories, but it was still loads of fun. Sure I wish they would stop making Tarzan scamper around on his knuckles, and let him speak fluent English for Christ’s sake, but the stories we do get from this Disney series are mostly well written. The action is fun, the villains are properly villainous, and if seeing this series causes one child to track down the original stories then this show has more than served its purpose. Disney’s The Legend of Tarzan may be guilty of widely diverging from the source material, but it’s also quite entertaining.

Disney’s The Legend of Tarzan 7/10 Show Rank - 7/10 7/10 Summary Disney managed to put together a solid adventure show starring one of literature’s greatest heroes, though not a faithful as one would like you can’t deny its entertainment value. With a great voice cast and excellent animation The Legend of Tarzan is fun for all ages.