President Trump Donald John TrumpOmar fires back at Trump over rally remarks: 'This is my country' Pelosi: Trump hurrying to fill SCOTUS seat so he can repeal ObamaCare Trump mocks Biden appearance, mask use ahead of first debate MORE and Education Secretary Betsy DeVos Elizabeth (Betsy) Dee DeVosSpecial counsel investigating DeVos for potential Hatch Act violation: report NEA president says Azar and DeVos should resign over school reopening guidance The Hill's 12:30 Report - Presented by Facebook - You might want to download TikTok now MORE stumbled this week in explaining the administration’s proposed budget cuts to the Special Olympics.

In two separate congressional hearings, DeVos found herself defending the cuts in Trump’s 2020 spending request, only to have the president turn around and denounce his own proposal.

ADVERTISEMENT

The contrasting positions played out amid a backdrop of lawmakers grilling agency chiefs about draconian cuts to popular government programs, leaving administration officials with the choice of defending the spending reductions or disagreeing with Trump, who is known to prize loyalty among his Cabinet members.

DeVos went before appropriators to defend the administration’s proposal to slash $8.5 billion, or 12 percent, from the education budget.

"It eliminates 30 programs, it significantly reduces funding for several others," said Sen. Roy Blunt Roy Dean BluntSocial media platforms put muscle into National Voter Registration Day Senate GOP faces pivotal moment on pick for Supreme Court This week: Supreme Court fight over Ginsburg's seat upends Congress's agenda MORE (R-Mo.), chairman of the Senate Appropriations subcommittee that covers education. "There are programs here that are unlikely to be eliminated in any final budget.”

Sen. Patty Murray Patricia (Patty) Lynn MurraySenate Democrats introduce legislation to probe politicization of pandemic response Trump health officials grilled over reports of politics in COVID-19 response CDC director pushes back on Caputo claim of 'resistance unit' at agency MORE (Wash.), the top Democrat on the committee, drove the point home more aggressively.

"Your budget request fails to invest in our youngest learners, our students in public schools,” she said. “It fails to help students who are struggling to better themselves in higher education, and it fails student loan borrowers who are saddled with debt.”

DeVos responded by saying tough fiscal times called for tough fiscal measures.

“We had to make tough choices and decisions around budget priorities," she told senators.

ADVERTISEMENT

But appropriators seized on the $18 million cut for the Special Olympics, the world’s largest sporting event for adults with disabilities. Trump has proposed cutting funding to it in each of his three annual budget proposals.

“I have given a portion of my salary to Special Olympics. I hope all of this debate inspires private contributions to Special Olympics," DeVos said, arguing that the program could make up the government shortfall through charitable donations.

When pressed, she said she did not know how many children might be impacted by the cuts, a figure Democrats put at 272,000.

The spectacle set off waves of negative headlines and reactions, including from the Special Olympics chairman and ESPN personalities. With no signs to change course from the White House, DeVos maintained her position from Tuesday's House hearing at the follow-up Senate hearing on Thursday.

But DeVos was not the only member of the administration forced to defend Trump’s budget in front of angry lawmakers.

Trump’s fiscal 2020 budget plan calls for slashing domestic spending by as much as 9 percent, with many of the cuts targeted at key programs. It suggested shaving a third off the Environmental Protection Agency, axing nearly a quarter from the State Department, and lopping off more than a fifth from the Department of Transportation, which oversees much of the nation's federal infrastructure.

In a hearing on the National Science Foundation (NSF), the country’s leading non-medical research organization, Director France A. Córdova thanked the committee for record-high funding in 2019, and she reminded members that previous funding had led to major achievements, including technologies necessary for smartphones, weather radars and even sign language. She proceeded to defend a proposed 12 percent budget cut as a contribution toward deficit reduction.

“Why would anyone in the world want to cut NSF funding given that its funding drives our economy, enhances our national security and advances this nation’s leadership globally?” asked Rep. Matt Cartwright Matthew (Matt) Alton CartwrightRaces heat up for House leadership posts Trump Jr. seeks to elect 'new blood' to Republican Party Republicans face worsening outlook in battle for House MORE (D-Pa.).

Energy Secretary Rick Perry Rick PerryEnergy secretary questions consensus that humans cause climate change OVERNIGHT ENERGY: Democrats push resolution to battle climate change, sluggish economy and racial injustice | Senators reach compromise on greenhouse gas amendment stalling energy bill | Trump courts Florida voters with offshore drilling moratorium OVERNIGHT ENERGY: Trump signs major conservation bill into law | Senate votes to confirm Energy's No. 2 official | Trump Jr. expresses opposition to Pebble Mine project MORE, meanwhile, defended an 11 percent cut to his budget by saying, "Success will be measured not by the dollars spent but by the results achieved."

Rep. Marcy Kaptur Marcia (Marcy) Carolyn KapturUkraine language in GOP platform underscores Trump tensions Eye on gavel, Wasserman Schultz proposes panel on racial inequality in spending Overnight Defense: Army now willing to rename bases named after Confederates | Dems demand answers on 'unfathomable' nuke testing discussions | Pentagon confirms death of north African al Qaeda leader MORE (D-Ohio), chairwoman of the Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies, told him the budget request "is riddled with backward looking proposals." She pointed to cuts in energy efficiency programs, a $1 billion reduction in energy research and the elimination of weatherization programs.

Democrats fumed over the proposed elimination of entities like the National Endowment for the Arts and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.

House Appropriations Committee Chairwoman Nita Lowey Nita Sue LoweyTop House Democrats call for watchdog probe into Pompeo's Jerusalem speech With Biden, advocates sense momentum for lifting abortion funding ban Progressives look to flex their muscle in next Congress after primary wins MORE (D-N.Y.) called Trump’s spending proposal “devastating” and pointed to “deep cuts in investments in clean energy, mental health services, after-school programs and much more.”

For administration officials like DeVos, this week’s experience highlights the challenge of defending Trump’s spending priorities without any guarantee he will back them up.

At one point, DeVos attempted to push back on her congressional critics.

"Let’s not use disabled children in a twisted way for your political narrative, that is just disgusting and shameful and I think we should move on from that," she said at the Senate hearing.

But when reporters asked Trump about the proposed cuts, he distanced himself from the matter — two days after DeVos’s initial testimony and after her second congressional hearing.

“I have overridden my people,” he said.” We're funding the Special Olympics.”

DeVos then released a statement saying she and Trump “see eye-to-eye” on the issue.

Rep. Mark Pocan Mark William PocanOvernight Defense: Pentagon redirects pandemic funding to defense contractors | US planning for full Afghanistan withdrawal by May | Anti-Trump GOP group puts ads in military papers Democrats call for investigation into Pentagon redirecting COVID-19 funds Clark rolls out endorsements in assistant Speaker race MORE (D-Wis.), who grilled DeVos at the House hearing, jokingly called for someone to “pull Betsy from under the bus.”