UPDATE (November 2016)

Voters pass Proposition E by 79% to shift maintenance responsibility of street trees and root-damaged sidewalks from property owners to the City. The measure also provides funding for trees on public schoolyards.

Can you imagine a San Francisco without trees?

Developed in collaboration with San Francisco Public Works, the Urban Forestry Council, and Friends of the Urban Forest, the Urban Forest Plan (Phase 1: Street Trees) provides a long-term vision and strategy to improve the health and sustainability of the City’s urban forest.

Adopted by the Board of Supervisors in 2015, the Plan identifies policies and strategies to create an expanded, healthy, and thriving street tree population for all of San Francisco (download the Urban Forest Plan (Phase 1) Summary or the Full Report).

Importance of Trees

Healthy tree-lined streets are a key component of our urban forest. An estimated 105,000 trees grow along San Francisco’s streets. These trees contribute to a more walkable, livable and sustainable city. They remove pollutants from air and water. They create greener and more vibrant neighborhoods. They make streets more enjoyable to walk and shop along. Street trees connect us to nature and enhance the quality of our daily lives. The urban forest returns millions of dollars annually in benefits 1. See sidebar for more info on the benefits of trees.

Why a Plan Now?

Without a comprehensive vision for the care and management of the City's street trees, their fate is uncertain. The Urban Forest Plan seeks to address the following threats to the long-term health of San Francisco's street trees:

Small and Shrinking Tree Canopy

San Francisco has one of the smallest tree canopies of any major U.S. city.

San Francisco was naturally a non-forested environment with fewer trees than east coast or other forested environments. Today, the City’s urban tree canopy (13.7%), measured by the amount of land covered by trees when viewed from above, is one of the smallest of any large U.S. city – less than Los Angeles (21%), Chicago (17%) and New York City (24%) – and unfortunately, it’s on the decline. New plantings are not keeping pace with tree removals and mortality, while tens of thousands of potential street tree planting spaces remain empty. A concentrated effort to add new street trees will help stem the decline of the urban forest while bringing highly visible greening benefits to our neighborhoods.

San Francisco has one of the smallest tree canopies of any major U.S. city. San Francisco was naturally a non-forested environment with fewer trees than east coast or other forested environments. Today, the City’s urban tree canopy (13.7%), measured by the amount of land covered by trees when viewed from above, is one of the smallest of any large U.S. city – less than Los Angeles (21%), Chicago (17%) and New York City (24%) – and unfortunately, it’s on the decline. New plantings are not keeping pace with tree removals and mortality, while tens of thousands of potential street tree planting spaces remain empty. A concentrated effort to add new street trees will help stem the decline of the urban forest while bringing highly visible greening benefits to our neighborhoods. Inadequate Maintenance Funding and Fragmented Maintenance Structure

Trees in San Francisco face a number of challenges due to historic underfunding and inadequate maintenance.

Since 2007, the urban forestry budget has decreased dramatically, bringing the average pruning cycle for City-maintained trees from 5 years to 12 years per tree. The City is transferring maintenance responsibility for tens of thousands of trees to property owners, creating an inefficient, confusing, and costly maintenance program that is compromising tree health and safety and diminishing the social and environmental benefits that street trees provide. This controversial and fragmented maintenance structure has raised concerns about the long-term health and future of the City’s street trees. Identifying stable funding sources is essential to restoring the health of our urban forest.

Trees in San Francisco face a number of challenges due to historic underfunding and inadequate maintenance. Since 2007, the urban forestry budget has decreased dramatically, bringing the average pruning cycle for City-maintained trees from 5 years to 12 years per tree. The City is transferring maintenance responsibility for tens of thousands of trees to property owners, creating an inefficient, confusing, and costly maintenance program that is compromising tree health and safety and diminishing the social and environmental benefits that street trees provide. This controversial and fragmented maintenance structure has raised concerns about the long-term health and future of the City’s street trees. Identifying stable funding sources is essential to restoring the health of our urban forest. Harsh Growing Environment

San Francisco’s streets can be a difficult place for trees to take root and flourish.

Narrow sidewalks, compacted soil, drought, neglect, improper care, underground utilities, and vandalism make it difficult to survive and reach maturity. San Francisco’s urban forest has great potential to expand by embracing alternative methods to green our streets, buildings, and public spaces; especially where tree planting is not currently feasible. Embracing a range of greening methods on public and private property can provide significant potential to expand our urban forest.

Key Recommendations

The Urban Forest Plan (Phase 1: Street Trees) contains a long-term vision and strategy for the city's street trees. The Plan includes the following key recommendations:

RECOMMENDATION #1: Maximize the benefits of street trees

Street trees should be recognized for their ability to help achieve targeted environmental and public health goals. The City should identify which species perform best to maximize the environmental, economic, and social benefits of San Francisco’s trees. This information can be used by forest managers and property owners to more carefully select and plant trees, thereby maximizing the benefits most relevant to the City.

Street trees should be recognized for their ability to help achieve targeted environmental and public health goals. The City should identify which species perform best to maximize the environmental, economic, and social benefits of San Francisco’s trees. This information can be used by forest managers and property owners to more carefully select and plant trees, thereby maximizing the benefits most relevant to the City. RECOMMENDATION #2: Increase the street tree population with 50,000 new trees by 2035

The Plan calls for planting 50,000 new street trees over the next 20 years: from 105,000 to 155,000. These new trees will help stem the decline of the urban forest, help create a more equitable distribution of tree canopy, and reduce greening inequities in different areas of the City. An associated funding and maintenance program is needed to carry out this expanded planting program and ensure their long-term health.

The Plan calls for planting 50,000 new street trees over the next 20 years: from 105,000 to 155,000. These new trees will help stem the decline of the urban forest, help create a more equitable distribution of tree canopy, and reduce greening inequities in different areas of the City. An associated funding and maintenance program is needed to carry out this expanded planting program and ensure their long-term health. RECOMMENDATION #3: Establish & fund a citywide street tree maintenance program

Creating a citywide street tree maintenance program would require the City to get serious about establishing long-term funding solution for our trees. Privately maintained street trees generally fare worse than publicly maintained trees. The Plan recommends relieving homeowners from the responsibility of maintenance and repairing tree-related sidewalk damage by centralizing responsibility for 100 percent of San Francisco’s street trees under the San Francisco Public Works through a fully funded municipal street tree program. Possible funding tools include general obligation bonds, an assessment district, parcel tax, and General Fund revenue.

Creating a citywide street tree maintenance program would require the City to get serious about establishing long-term funding solution for our trees. Privately maintained street trees generally fare worse than publicly maintained trees. The Plan recommends relieving homeowners from the responsibility of maintenance and repairing tree-related sidewalk damage by centralizing responsibility for 100 percent of San Francisco’s street trees under the San Francisco Public Works through a fully funded municipal street tree program. Possible funding tools include general obligation bonds, an assessment district, parcel tax, and General Fund revenue. RECOMMENDATION #4: Manage street trees throughout their entire life-cycle

The Plan recommends managing San Francisco’s street trees throughout their entire life-cycle be creating an interdependent urban forestry operation. By minimizing waste, reducing travel distances, and providing second-life opportunities for locally grown urban wood, San Francisco can become a model of 21st century urban natural resource management. Components of the Plan include developing a street tree nursery to grow street trees locally through a community partnership; determining a tree removal and succession plantings strategy; and creating an urban wood re-use program to geberate second-life products from trees removed from City streets.

Find a more detailed summary of the Plan’s primary recommendations here.

Notes

1. Assessing Urban Forest Effects and Values: San Francisco’s Urban Forest, United States Department of Agriculture-Forest Service, Northern Research Station (2007).