Untold money has been spent at the Etihad yet the squad remains reliant on an ageing midfielder with no deputy

Pep Guardiola’s failure to find a credible back-up for Fernandinho despite a £542.9m spend on players since taking over as Manchester City manager in 2016 is receiving heightened scrutiny. City have lost three times in four league games and significantly Fernandinho’s thigh problem forced him to miss the losses to Crystal Palace and Leicester. The player Guardiola believes could operate in any outfield position is in contention for Sunday’s trip to Southampton but he may not start.

City’s slump has allowed Liverpool to take advantage at the top of the Premier League and without Fernandinho the fear is they may slip further behind. City are already 11 points worse off than at the season’s midpoint a year ago.

When Sheikh Mansour bought the club a decade ago the plan was for City to acquire two elite performers for each position. So for Guardiola to oversee a half-a-billion-pound splurge on players and end up with no serious competition for Fernandinho is a puzzle.

City’s Pep Guardiola after Leicester loss: I must change the dynamic Read more

The manager’s assessment that the Brazilian is indispensable is supported by City’s results with and without the midfielder in the starting XI under Guardiola. Of the 14 league outings for which Fernandinho has been absent, City have won nine – a success rate of 64.3%. In 81 matches with him, City have recorded 60 victories, or 74.1%. After the defeat to Leicester Guardiola said: “It is not necessary to lose three games from four to say how important Fernandinho is to us. It is a specific position, we don’t have his qualities again. He is an incredible player.”

In October the manager fiercely defended Fernandinho when Gary Neville pointed on Sky to how many fouls he commits, and last month the player indicated how trusted he feels: “The responsibility on me is big.”

All of which underlines his importance to the team (he was in the side for the 2-0 loss at Chelsea on 8 December, but was not fully fit and ended that match in discomfort).

At the start of the month Guardiola voiced concern at the risk to Fernandinho by saying it would kill him for next season if he continued to start every league outing, adding further weight to the question: why did City not follow through in the summer with acquiring a back-up for a player who turns 34 in May?

Facebook Twitter Pinterest The £60m purchase of Riyad Mahrez looks misguided given Manchester City’s current predicament. Photograph: Darren Staples/Reuters

Interest was shown in Fred but when he joined Manchester United in June, Guardiola turned to Jorginho. City believed a deal was in place for the then Napoli midfielder only for him to follow Maurizio Sarri to Chelsea.

Back then, City’s stance was that they would not pursue another defensive midfielder, yet with Yaya Touré also departing they were left doubly exposed. It made the £60m purchase of Riyad Mahrez seem particularly misguided. With Raheem Sterling, Leroy Sané, Bernardo Silva, Gabriel Jesus and Phil Foden already in the ranks, Mahrez appears a luxury given City’s current predicament.

Yet it is understood the club are adamant the defeats by Palace and Leicester and Fernandinho’s contributing absence will not lead to a kneejerk reversal of the decision to avoid spending in the January window, which opens on Tuesday. “The answer was clear two times about this issue,” said Guardiola.

Manchester City lose again as Ricardo Pereira hits shock winner for Leicester Read more

Since Fernandinho arrived in the summer of 2013, the club has added only two specialist back-ups: Fernando, from Porto in June 2014, and Fabian Delph, from Villa in July 2015, with the former departing in August 2017 and the latter not trusted for the role by Guardiola.

It is a further surprise that Guardiola has not identified an able second-choice from within City’s squad, especially given his ability to improve and recast those under his management. Delph – suspended for the game at Southampton – would seem a prime candidate: a central midfielder rated good enough to play in the position for England by Gareth Southgate, and whose muck-and-nettles game is akin to Fernandinho’s. Delph has become Benjamin Mendy’s stand-in at left-back but he is no natural fit there, as his red card at Leicester for a two-footed lunge at Ricardo Pereira underlined. Ilkay Gündoğan was chosen for the position against Leicester, but, while a silkier operator, he lacks the Englishman’s bite.

It is an attribute Fernandinho has in abundance and that City miss sorely when he is unavailable. One of his finest displays this season came in his last match – the 3-1 win over Everton at the Etihad Stadium on 15 December – when his muscularity wrested control of a contest City might have lost.

That afternoon he did what he so often does for the team: married an ability to pass and create with the awareness to anticipate and destroy. City concede in excess of 50% more goals when he does not start. He is the complete midfielder.

John Stones has been tried but so far has not been a success. The centre-back was given 16 minutes as a replacement for Fernandinho in September’s 5-0 win at Cardiff City before playing all of the Palace loss.

Despite City having no plans to enter the market next month one potential target might be Lyon’s Tanguy Ndombele, who impressed in the Champions League against them.

Guardiola has other personnel problems as he takes City to Southampton for a match he must win. Mendy is once again out injured, until the end of January, but the jury remains out regarding his temperament – and with no obvious backup, left-back is another weak link. On the other flank, Kyle Walker’s composure is a concern, as evidenced by him conceding what proved to be Palace’s winning penalty. He was criticised by Guardiola and dropped for the Leicester loss.

Yet it is the failure to fill Fernandinho’s boots that has left Guardiola most vulnerable. After the result at Anfield went against City yesterday, even with the Brazilian’s return, the prospect of a successful title defence may have slipped away.