The latest in the RIAA search for money, we have Warner v. Berry . Berry is a homeless man living in a shelter in Manhattan. The RIAA sent the summons to an apartment where the man once lived before moving onto the streets. I don't even know how a man being so poor could possibly share music on the Internet when he clearly can't even afford a place to live let along Internet access. If this guy went to jail, it'd be a huge step up for him. He'd get meals, a place to sleep, government assistance to get back on his feet. I think this is an outrage. The RIAA's "fear tactics", as they say "you could be the next one", have turned to nothing less than a rabid dog biting any creature that moves and without discretion. It they're so inclined to secure money lost by attacking homeless people, stroke victims fetus' (j/k), computer-less people and other cases frowned upon by decent society, maybe they should stop digging a money pit and spend some on better analysis of their supposed victims.If things continue this way, the RIAA should just be shot like the danger to society that it has become. More harm is caused by their madness than by any current and former illegal sharing network. Every time I hear one of these cases, I'm inclined to stop or postpone purchase of movies and music that I would have otherwise liked to own. The free indie and fair-use markets have grown so much in the last 5 years that I'm inclined to donate my money to the betterment of the little people and the collapse of capitalist power. Mainstream music has slowly started to show its true colors, and they are ugly colors at that.The RIAA has turned rabid, and its death comes like the survival of the fittest.