Download raw source

Delivered-To: john.podesta@gmail.com Received: by 10.25.24.94 with SMTP id o91csp2346853lfi; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 21:57:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.55.42.148 with SMTP id q20mr25478513qkq.68.1430283425795; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 21:57:05 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <jake.sullivan@gmail.com> Received: from mail-qc0-x229.google.com (mail-qc0-x229.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400d:c01::229]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 83si20170229qkv.4.2015.04.28.21.57.05 for <john.podesta@gmail.com> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 28 Apr 2015 21:57:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jake.sullivan@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c01::229 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400d:c01::229; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jake.sullivan@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c01::229 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jake.sullivan@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: by mail-qc0-x229.google.com with SMTP id m10so7678670qcp.3 for <john.podesta@gmail.com>; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 21:57:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=2H05MD6HZ30eeFCPaHMVFD0oJB43XcDUBz4OTft42Wo=; b=xC+zsXit4gMk3Q2LpsJzpv4WjM+6z/53i9aChGYR9xmFRC359BXjvCaQDrYJ/PKoQe 1V2Qrrtltq7PVzAoVYN+pEtpMiSRBEM64vaqz0im5LWZIHmB48L2wVGZHdWkkIxAxEhW ZYfuUbAC3aRh1aUzrGQUIgtk+d16du2n+vXwkiICDkHKCxS1AUMdK55fwi3BH5R3R2vt gt0zgLw0LDMZbDzGMPLXMjiFESc7hrfH4Ck8OgMCH6ZX/ZT+IJc3MjbcdBP7rD3KbSIt +NtdLXuSI3aQ5uM8WiWFo2WWcHtlNcXJ1wjim+WTWE9To1Xd76O/GiFxSDYWyuMsMQYj ARlA== X-Received: by 10.140.81.39 with SMTP id e36mr15324463qgd.10.1430283424963; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 21:57:04 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <jake.sullivan@gmail.com> Received: from [29.106.112.24] (66-87-80-24.pools.spcsdns.net. [66.87.80.24]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id t33sm14216895qge.19.2015.04.28.21.57.03 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 28 Apr 2015 21:57:04 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-746B4D4D-17E5-46D3-A772-E38B9CE61F53 Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: HRC @ Dinkins Forum From: Jake Sullivan <jake.sullivan@gmail.com> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12B436) In-Reply-To: <CAE6FiQ8zrfJ-oEwswS6QaWb-onRyajFvdmf-aVWJ6OVO8+z68Q@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:57:01 -0400 CC: Dan Schwerin <dschwerin@hillaryclinton.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <7EE52DF3-6E44-4BC2-AB71-D3331A0FCBD2@gmail.com> References: <CAKErNju+by-TKSL0iUzON5GeiUhKLPhXE85yreikNcyKrxYtNA@mail.gmail.com> <14d01ee11e1-7984-4439@webprd-a75.mail.aol.com> <CAAEwKfxDM4wE1CSGAUTFELTc1qX7bcW+NXEC=T0u1jG3R9uBeA@mail.gmail.com> <5991663817678951920@unknownmsgid> <CAAEwKfz7xzbnj+NFrug4UT5Gm9jQHE2FjnTLcFtSBGc7eMU=cA@mail.gmail.com> <CAE6FiQ8zrfJ-oEwswS6QaWb-onRyajFvdmf-aVWJ6OVO8+z68Q@mail.gmail.com> To: John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com> --Apple-Mail-746B4D4D-17E5-46D3-A772-E38B9CE61F53 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable HRC objected to "non-violent" on grounds that various kinds of "non violent"= offenders (white collar criminals, corrupt officials, money launderers, fra= udsters, etc) should do the time. She was more comfortable with low level. = =20 > On Apr 29, 2015, at 12:00 AM, John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com> wrote:= >=20 > Dan,=20 > Excellent and sorry to be late in. Just two small points recognizing it ma= y ne too late: > 1) You use low level offenders. Did you resist using non-violent offenders= ? Comes up like on page 22. Non-violent seems like the most sympathetic grou= p, but maybe doesn't cover enough of the problem.=20 > 2) kinda light on treatment which is probably ok fpr this, but need to bui= ld that out in the future >> On Apr 28, 2015 6:57 PM, "Dan Schwerin" <dschwerin@hillaryclinton.com> wr= ote: >> Sending this around one more time. HRC is pleased and ready to go. If yo= u have any final thoughts or concerns, please let me know. >> Thanks >> Dan >>=20 >>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Marlon Marshall <mmarshall@hillaryclint= on.com> wrote: >>> Dan this really is fantastic. Thanks for your work on it. >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> > On Apr 28, 2015, at 6:18 PM, Dan Schwerin <dschwerin@hillaryclinton.co= m> wrote: >>> > >>> > Thanks to all for the great feedback. Here's a revised draft. HRC is r= eviewing as well. >>> > A few notes: >>> > -- Please take one more look at the graph Mandy added about the previo= us tragedies. It's a powerful litany. However, we're not naming Michael Bro= wn here. Is that ok? >>> > -- Sharpened the body cameras point >>> > -- Added a bit more on the link to economic injustice. >>> > Dan >>> > >>> > <2015-04-28 Dinkins - 6pm .docx> --Apple-Mail-746B4D4D-17E5-46D3-A772-E38B9CE61F53 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>HRC objected to "non-violent" on grounds that various kinds of "non violent" offenders (white collar criminals, corrupt officials, money launderers, fraudsters, etc) should do the time. She was more comfortable with low level. </div><div><br><br></div><div><br>On Apr 29, 2015, at 12:00 AM, John Podesta <<a href="mailto:john.podesta@gmail.com">john.podesta@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><p dir="ltr">Dan, <br> Excellent and sorry to be late in. Just two small points recognizing it may ne too late:<br> 1) You use low level offenders. Did you resist using non-violent offenders? Comes up like on page 22. Non-violent seems like the most sympathetic group, but maybe doesn't cover enough of the problem. <br> 2) kinda light on treatment which is probably ok fpr this, but need to build that out in the future<br> </p> <div class="gmail_quote">On Apr 28, 2015 6:57 PM, "Dan Schwerin" <<a href="mailto:dschwerin@hillaryclinton.com">dschwerin@hillaryclinton.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Sending this around one more time. HRC is pleased and ready to go. If you have any final thoughts or concerns, please let me know.<div>Thanks</div><div>Dan</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Marlon Marshall <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mmarshall@hillaryclinton.com" target="_blank">mmarshall@hillaryclinton.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Dan this really is fantastic. Thanks for your work on it.<br> <div><div><br> <br> <br> > On Apr 28, 2015, at 6:18 PM, Dan Schwerin <<a href="mailto:dschwerin@hillaryclinton.com" target="_blank">dschwerin@hillaryclinton.com</a>> wrote:<br> ><br> > Thanks to all for the great feedback. Here's a revised draft. HRC is reviewing as well.<br> > A few notes:<br> > -- Please take one more look at the graph Mandy added about the previous tragedies. It's a powerful litany. However, we're not naming Michael Brown here. Is that ok?<br> > -- Sharpened the body cameras point<br> > -- Added a bit more on the link to economic injustice.<br> > Dan<br> ><br> </div></div><div><div>> <2015-04-28 Dinkins - 6pm .docx><br> </div></div></blockquote></div><br></div> </blockquote></div> </div></blockquote></body></html> --Apple-Mail-746B4D4D-17E5-46D3-A772-E38B9CE61F53--