news, latest-news

Claims by a NSW police worker that she was raped by her prison guard ex-boyfriend have been labelled as "thoroughly absurd and ridiculous" by prosecutors. And the prosecution has also alleged that her new boyfriend, a NSW police officer, lied on oath to back up his girlfriend's story about being raped. The hearing of the false rape accusation case finished on Tuesday afternoon in the ACT Magistrates Court. The woman is accused of falsely claiming her ex-boyfriend, an officer at the Alexander Maconochie Centre, raped her twice. It has also been alleged that she made up stories about having an iPad stolen from her home, that her car was broken into at Canberra Hospital, and of being run off the road and attacked with a knife on Horse Park Drive in Canberra's north. She suggested the prison guard's family may have been involved in those acts. A GPS tracker on her car later suggested she planted the iPad outside her ex's family home, while CCTV footage appeared to conflict with her story about the hospital. The guard was locked up for four months in Goulburn jail, before being released when doubt was raised about some of the woman's claims. The woman had also made an unrelated claim that her friend's father had raped her years earlier, in 2007. The prosecution is alleging that accusation was also false. But defence lawyer Michael Kukulies-Smith has argued the prosecution had failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the events did not occur, which they were required to do to prove his client had made false accusations. Nor, he said, had they proved that the woman intended for the prison guard or her friend's father to be charged by police, saying members of the public often assumed it was up to them whether a charge was laid. "Many people misunderstand the nature of reports to police and who has prosecutorial control," he said. Prosecutor Anthony Williamson used his closing submission to describe the woman's claims as a "tornado of lies" that saw a prison guard go to jail for something he did not do. He said her motivation was financial, and alleged she used the allegations to try to influence family law proceedings involving the couple's home. The woman had claimed that she was raped and bashed viciously in her backyard on March 21, 2014. Mr Williamson said she had given various statements about that attack to responding police, paramedics, and again to police in two statements. He said that in a later affidavit tendered in family court proceedings she added a significant new element, that her ex had hosed her down after the rape. "We say that's absolute rubbish, that's a lie. Neither [the police sergeant] or the paramedic reported anything about her being wet," he said. Mr Williamson said her skin-tight jeans were also pulled up around her waist when police arrived, something that made no sense. "Does it really make sense that he would brutally and violently rape her and then go to the trouble of pulling her pants up?" Her hair was also found to be neat and in a bun, despite her claims she had been grabbed by the hair and smashed into a brick wall. Mr Williamson said her story about that day simply did not add up, and that it was "inherently implausible". "The only conclusion is that what has been described by the defendant is thoroughly absurd and ridiculous. "We say it's indicative of this defendant getting carried away with her own lies." Later on Tuesday, Mr Kukulies-Smith said it was remarkable prosecutors were now attacking the accusations as utterly implausible. The case against the prison guard made it all the way to the ACT Supreme Court on the basis of the woman's claims, before questions were raised about her credibility. "The elephant in the room is my friend's office filed indictments on these bases," he said. "The office of the Director of Public Prosecutions in the ACT now submits that it filed indictments alleging inherently implausible matters. "It just seems beyond belief that such a submission could be made." Mr Williamson had also alleged that the woman's new partner, who cannot be named due to his police work, had lied about a conversation with a neighbour about family law proceedings, and about receiving a call from the defendant and hearing screaming and yelling in the background on a day she was alleged to have been raped. Chief Magistrate Lorraine Walker has reserved her decision in the case and is expected to hand down judgment next month.

https://nnimgt-a.akamaihd.net/transform/v1/crop/frm/silverstone-ct-migration/3eb8903a-038f-47f1-abda-222d5b79b0fc/r0_185_480_456_w1200_h678_fmax.jpg