As expected, the House Judiciary Committee voted this morning to subpoena the entire Mueller report without redactions:

House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler says the committee will issue subpoenas if Attorney William General Barr does not provide the full Mueller report to Congress https://t.co/YtWy602adh pic.twitter.com/EPP2ROHEcR — CNN Politics (@CNNPolitics) April 3, 2019

JUST IN: House Judiciary Committee votes to authorize Chair Jerry Nadler to issue subpoenas for full Mueller report and the special counsel's underlying evidence. https://t.co/ZcUZnFjSYv pic.twitter.com/Gl3bkjxWy3 — ABC News (@ABC) April 3, 2019

CNN’s Manu Raju: “Are you willing to negotiate any middle ground in terms of redactions of the Mueller report?” House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler: “No. The committee must see everything” pic.twitter.com/F1IOTWIZaf — CNN Politics (@CNNPolitics) April 3, 2019

People have noticed that Nadler had a different opinion about Congress obtaining unredacted special counsel reports a couple decades ago:

Trump: Nadler wants full Mueller report but opposed release of Starr report https://t.co/ttilerHA7i — The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) April 2, 2019

Rep. Jerry Nadler Did Not Want the Starr Report to Be Released: 'It's Grand Jury Material' https://t.co/AiprsQdIrc via @mediaite — John Roberts (@johnrobertsFox) April 2, 2019

In which the chairman takes the exact opposite position from the one he took 21 years ago regarding the Starr report. https://t.co/XJ8HuSpvQh — Brit Hume (@brithume) April 3, 2019

But wait, Nadler can explain that! Or at least he tried to:

Nadler on reasons he opposed releasing the Starr report in 1998 and pushing to release the Mueller report today:

I was right 21 years ago. I’m right now. And it’s totally consistent — Chad Pergram (@ChadPergram) April 3, 2019

Spin like the wind, Rep. Nadler!

and he said it with a straight face. That's the best part. — Mark M. (@mmontuori) April 3, 2019

Mueller finding no collusion continues to drive Democrats crazier by the day.