I’ve seen a few libertarians around the ‘sphere question the existence of ‘sexual status’ or even the ‘sexual market’, so it’s time to set the record straight on that. I don’t quite understand your pathological aversion to the unquantifiable, but luckily for you I can speak your uncouth language. Just as the ‘market value’ of diversity-free safety and social trust is reflected in the housing market, we have hard data on the sexual market because sex is a commodity that people buy and sell.

Now, I’m sure you’re still with me when I say that every exchange of goods and services for money is a ‘fair exchange’. I.e. the money provided accurately reflects the value of the service provided at that point in time. If something is worth more one week than another, well, that’s just how markets work. Supply and demand. So, let’s take a look at what sex sells for. If you go out to a shady neighborhood at night to find a street whore, you’re looking at a few hundred bucks to get your rocks off with an older, moderately attractive slut. Which varies depending on how drug-addicted, young, and attractive said street meat is.

A few years back, I remember a scandal where some politician, Spitzer I think his name was, was caught paying for high-end prostitutes. A high-end escort is a young, feminine, and beautiful whore. Spending the night with one of those bitches will set you back $20,000 to 50,000. So we can see that whorishness being a constant, the value multiplier for youth and beauty is a whopping 100x. Still with me? We can go deeper (heh). Occasionally, young beautiful women who are virgins will sell their virginity. You can already tell what price that commands on the market. I even recall a story about an Arab prince paying $6,000,000 for an Instagram model’s virginity. (That’s supply and demand at work, of course, because white girls are scarce and in demand in brown countries.)

You should still be with me. My model might be a bit rough, but markets are markets. They don’t lie. The market value of a beautiful young virgin, as opposed to a beautiful young whore, is 50-100x greater. Compared to an old used-up whore, the market value of a young, beautiful virgin is 10,000x greater, or 1,000,000% of the value of an old slut.

Here’s where it gets tricky. You already knew that there’s a ‘real’ market where people trade sex for hard, liquid cash. Now how do we derive another ‘sexual market’, where people voluntarily have sex with each other, from this? Well, we’ve already established that a beautiful young virgin has an asset worth 2.5-5 million dollars that she carries around with her everywhere. Even if she’s a young beautiful slut, her sex is worth 20-50,000. Everywhere she goes, she encounters men who see her and are as tempted by her beauty as they would be tempted by a suitcase full of benjamins.

Under this metric, it would seem insane that beautiful young women would give up their sex for anything less than the equivalent of a shitload of money. But if you’ve gotten out of your libertarian-cave recently and tasted the fresh air, you can’t help but notice that they do it a lot. For free, to rich suitboys, and broke bikers, and smelly DJs with heroin habits. And those girls feel like they’re getting a fair deal, because they’ll do it again and again. As a libertarian, you have to conclude that they’re making a rational economic choice. What those men are giving her in exchange isn’t good dick, which is almost worthless on the market, but something else. Something unquantifiable.

What men who fuck beautiful young girls have in common is that they are all top dog within their respective social milieux, or they project so much dominance that women get the impression that he is top dog of something, or will be in the future. Being owned by a top dog male, or even just the feeling of it for a night, is even more valuable to women than the suitcases of cash they occasionally sell their pussies for. Even more valuable, because far more of them choose to be piped out by a dominant male for free than choose to get poked by beta male peckers for suitcases of cash.

This quality in men that women trade their incredibly valuable sex for can be called ‘sexual capital’, but it refers to the quality that we tend to call ‘sexual status’ ’round these parts. I know my model is accurate because when men learn about my history slaying virgin puss, and fucking beautiful young sluts, they treat me with a respect about equivalent to the respect I see multimillionaires with successful businesses get. And from women, even more respect than men treated me with. Thus you will see dirty bikers and broke musicians swagger around like millionaires. They’ve accrued millions of dollars worth of sexual capital and have the envy of very rich men, like Elon Musk and his >tfw no gf. Needless to say, you’re not going to care very much about getting filthy rich when you’re a sexual millionaire. A modest living will do you just fine.

Finally, I’ve seen some morbidly autistic libertarians call traditionalist sexual mores “sexual communism”, as if society was more or less giving out wives to undeserving men, and the current, deregulated sexual market was a bastion of truth and beauty. First of all, it’s not a subsidy or a gift if duties and obligations are attached to it. It’s a contract. Even if traditional society was some ‘bureau of marriage’, handing out wives to every man (which it was not, and should not become), the concomitant responsibilities of upholding the King’s law, defending the Church, and fighting on the state’s behalf during war, would make this arrangement not a subsidy but a contract of employment. Secondly, you still had to find your own wife. Enforced virginity increases the supply of virgins, and thus lowers the market price so that marriageable young women are not monopolized by a tiny male elite. If this happens, 80% or more of men have no stake in the future and nothing to lose. You either get tribalism, on display in a ghetto near you, where over a third of men die from interpersonal violence, or you get Islam, where the harem-masters send out their surplus males to foreign lands to pillage and rape. Take away patriarchy and you have no hope of achieving anything resembling libertarian society.