Former Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard felt it was appropriate in 2011 to rebrand ‘Male Chauvinism’ as ‘Misogyny.’ The reasoning behind her decision was she did not think men took the term ‘male chauvinist’ seriously since its inception in the 60’s/70’s. She felt that the term had lost its bite.

The 1970’s man would have take offence to being called a male chauvinist pig. Through female overuse, the term has lost its punch to the point most men don’t even remember that Chauvinism was even a label, never mind a bad label.

Women are prone to demanding the redefinition of words because they feel that they are not inclusive enough to satisfy female emotional pride. Two recent examples:

A woman claims to have been ‘sort-of-raped’ because her partner ejaculated in her out of spite during anger sex. She states ‘Now that I’ve taken a small sip at the cup of rape, I understand just how terrible it is to have another human being rob me of my agency, and mark my body as their domain. It has taught me to look beyond troubled legal definitions of “rape” and instead focus on how victims feel.

Rape has a very specific legal definition. This is because it is a very very serious crime. Very specific words have very specific legal definition for a reason, people’s lives can be ruined if the words are misinterpreted. We can not change the meanings of words for the sake of emotional hysteria. Accusations of rape will put a man in jail. Sort-of-rape accusations will get thrown out of court. Prime example of this is UK dj Dr Fox who was taken to court for snog-rape of a 15 yr old girl who requested a snog, which is clearly not a crime. The case was thrown out.

An incredibly unattractive manly woman who wants to be a model laments “During my career path I’ve experienced first hand what people deem as beautiful. It’s not me. It’s not most people. It’s limited and small. It needs to change.’

We can not change the meaning of the word beautiful just so that those not worthy of the label can feel exceptional. We can not change instinctual primal concepts for the sake of the vanity of the few. The scale of beauty is ingrained throughout the human species and we all rate beauty on that scale identically.

The word misogyny has now become a political term. When a political term loses its bite, it’s normally through overuse and it’s subsequent normalisation and acceptance. Does feminism really want males to consider the pathological disorder of misogyny to be the norm? If feminism insists all men are misogynists, what will prevent all men from developing a true hatred and subsequent violence towards women?

Psychological disorders are different to societal constructs.

Misogyny is clinical psychological term referring to the pathological and irrational hatred of women. Violent rapists and murderes fall into this category.

Male Chauvinist is the cultural label for a man who negates women by applying to them stereotyped ideas of incompetence, inferiority, passivity, etc. Donald Trump, myself and most men would fit into this group.

Calling a man a misogynist has about the same impact as calling a female a slut, which no longer has not much impact after its acceptable use in the SNL news skits of the ’70’s (Jane, you ignorant slut). Amber Rose finds the word slut empowering. Does feminism want men to find the word misogynist empowering? Do men really get offend at the mention of misogyny?

By applying an extreme word to a lesser issue, feminism is nullifying the harsh edge the word carries. If most men are chauvinistic to a degree and are not ashamed to be labelled as such, why should a new word like ‘misogynist’ not lose its impact if over used.

If most men are now labelled misogynists, and misogyny breeds rape and fear, why would feminism want all males to become comfortable with the branding. Remember, even the word ‘Rape’ has become meaningless after accusations by women insisting that men of ‘sort of raping’ them is a crime.

Is chauvanism/misogyny really such a bad thing anyway?

Examples of valid stereotyping in support of a superior sex:

Incompetence: Boys say any failure they experience is down to lack of effort while often girls put their own failures down to lack of ability.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/sideways-view/201410/are-men-really-more-intelligent-women

Inferiority : Males are physically stronger than females. Males suffer from fewer mood swings than females.

Passivity : Women are frequently classicaly photographed passively leaning on men for security and serenity. They classically crave respect, time, consistency, communication, engagement, humour and humility. These are all passive requests.

These differences between the stereotypical characteristics of the sexes and are based on research and study. Studies show that for survival, men have the more important traits.

Females will always be the inferior sex. Until their strength, resilience and fortitude surpasses that of men, there will never be an even power balance as brute force will always win over the weaker sex.

Women need to remember half of the population in the world is male…And one day we will just say no.

Share this: Twitter

Facebook

Like this: Like Loading...