josh huff.JPG

Josh Huff

(Thomas Boyd/The Oregonian)

Oregon senior Josh Huff, named a

, has taken to Twitter to discuss his displeasure with the distinction.

And statistically speaking, he has a point.

Known for being outspoken, the senior said he felt "disrespected" by the nod and engaged on Twitter in a series of exchanges with fellow Ducks receiver Bralon Addison and lineman Tyler Johnstone, who both also were honorable mention selections.

Pac-12 first team wide receiver choices were Oregon State's Brandin Cooks and Colorado's Paul Richardson. Second team selections were Stanford's Ty Montgomery and Arizona's Jaelen Strong.

Based on receiving stats, a clear case could be made that Huff deserved consideration ahead of Montgomery -- whom he outranked in receptions, total yards, average yards per catch and touchdowns.

Here's how Pac-12 receivers ranked nationally by total receiving yards:

1. Cooks: 120 receptions, 1,670 yards, 13.9 yard average, 15 touchdowns

6. Richardson: 83 receptions, 1,343 yards, 16.2 yard average, 10 touchdowns

24. Strong: 69 receptions, 1,067 yards, 15.5 yard average, 7 touchdowns

28. Huff: 57 receptions, 1,036 yards, 18.2 yard average, 11 touchdowns

32. Utah's Dres Anderson: 53 receptions, 1,002 yards, 18.9 yard average, 7 touchdowns

53. Montgomery: 53 receptions, 868 yards, 16.4 yard average, 9 touchdowns

60. Cal's Chris Harper: 70 receptions, 852 yards, 12.2 yard average, 5 touchdowns

62. Addison: 56 receptions, 842 yards, 15.0 yard average, 7 touchdowns

Here's how the ensuing discussion went on Twitter. Take a look and let us know what you think in the comment thread: Does Huff have a point? Is there a chance Huff and Addison split the votes of Pac-12 coaches?

Huff previously spoke with disappointment regarding the Ducks' one-time prospects of a Rose Bowl, calling it a "prep game" for the national championship that is held a week later in Pasadena.

After his three-touchdown performance in Friday's Civil War, which earned him

, he had this to say, which one could suspect still applies: