A Denver school teacher has sued President Donald Trump claiming his recent administrative rule changes creating religious and moral exemptions to the Affordable Care Act violate her rights and discriminate against women.

Jessica Campbell, 30, relies on hormonal contraception for medical reasons, according to a civil rights lawsuit filed Thursday in U.S. District Court in Denver on her behalf by Denver attorneys Alan Kennedy-Shaffer and Joel Judd.

The lawsuit seeks a preliminary and permanent injunction to prevent Trump and several of his cabinet members from enforcing two interim final rules: the religious and moral exemptions of the Affordable Care Act.

The claim names Trump, Acting Secretary of Health and Human Services Eric Hargan, Secretary of Labor R. Alexander Acosta and Secretary of Treasury Steven Mnuchin as defendants.

Campbell also seeks declarations that Trump’s IFRs, implemented on Oct. 6, violate federal laws, the U.S. Constitution and provisions of the Affordable Care Act.

The IFRs allow any entity, not just churches or closely held corporations, to invoke religious or moral beliefs to unilaterally block employees from receiving contraception insurance coverage, the lawsuit says. They allow employers to dictate whether or not their female employees can reliably and affordably get contraception from their insurance provider, it says.

“The IFRs jeopardize women’s health and economic success in order to promote certain religious and moral views by attempting to nullify the right of equal access to preventive medical care, particularly contraceptive care and services, protected by the U.S. Constitution and set forth by Congress in the Women’s Health Amendment to the Affordable Care Act,” the lawsuit says.

Campbell received health insurance coverage through private school Colorado Academy’s health insurance plan, the lawsuit says.

Colorado Academy’s head of school Mike Davis said Friday afternoon that health insurance benefits provided to Campbell by the school “include coverage for contraception and contraceptive care, have not changed, and there are no plans to change those benefits.”

According to the lawsuit, Campbell “uses hormonal birth control for medically necessary health and safety reasons, including prevention of formation of ovarian cysts.”

Campbell also uses contraception to prevent unintended pregnancy, which is “foundational to her financial security, liberty, and reproductive freedom.”

She brought the lawsuit on behalf of herself and other women “whose basic rights are being violated.”

The interim final rules, the lawsuit says, “were promulgated without any notice, opportunity to comment, or evidence-based expert guidance, and fail to address fact-finding supporting prior regulations.”