Enter Donald Trump. If the Clinton forces could have handpicked a Republican candidate to run against this fall, it would almost certainly be Trump. He's even MORE high-profile than her. He's even MORE controversial than her. He's even MORE prone to dominate media coverage than her.

AD

AD

None of those things are good for Republicans. If the recipe to winning the White House in November is to turn the race into a referendum on Clinton, Trump is the exact worse choice to do that. Take the race to date as evidence. Trump has, without question, overshadowed Clinton (and every other candidate) for the nine months he has been an official candidate. Yes, when Clinton's email problems bubble up, they get covered. And, yes, when Bernie Sanders beat Clinton in Michigan or she swept all five states on March 15, that got covered, too. But, generally, the story each and every day is TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP.

Trump promises that if he is the nominee, he will act differently than he has in the course of winning the nomination -- more "presidential." But the defining quality of Trump's time in public life, which spans decades, is a knack for attracting -- and a love of -- the spotlight. He is someone who lives his entire life in public -- and likes it that way. He takes pride in his ability to get attention. He regularly touts how he hasn't had to spend as much of his own money as he thought he might have to in this campaign because he's gotten so much free media attention.

All of that has been great for him in a primary context. He has sucked the oxygen out of the GOP field, strangling the likes of Jeb Bush, Scott Walker, Marco Rubio and Chris Christie in the process. But a primary against 16 other candidates is not the same thing as a one-on-one general-election race against Hillary Clinton. Trump's ability to draw attention to himself -- largely via a willingness to say and do things other politicians won't -- works far less well in the latter race than it does in the former.