The Ethereum Improvement Proposal (EIP) The EIP, a reopened The original EIP proposal # 867 was introduced by Musiconomi developer Dan Phifer funds.

EIP editor Yoichi Hirai had criticized the draft for what he saw in his violation of a Japanese law on the creation of electromagnetic records, as well as it being " at odds with Ethereum philosophy ]

When the original proposal was closed, the Ethereum Reddit Community responded positively in a thread that congratulated the community, one user calling it a " bi g for the Ethereum community and network . "

Comments on Github on the opened version of the proposal # 867 showed the polarity of users' views on standardizing lost fund recovery.

Trojan horse for Ethereum "writing that" adding a recovery mechanism, no matter the amount of refinement and "safeguards" put in place, weakens the protocol . "

User Aribo went into more detail about the functions of the Ethereum philosophy, stating that fund recovery is not the responsibility of the system's developers:

" Instilling the recovery of funds as IMO misunderstands the function of the system. Ethereum is not a bank or a private company that has profits / losses and investments. If someone loses money in the economy system created within Ethereum is at its own peril, and it never should be the function and responsibility of the system, and thus its developers, to allow the recovery of these funds, even less, build the rules (19459003)

Implementing a method for stagnation or stolen crypto (19459003) [TheEthereumcommunityhasalreadybeendividedoveradisputewhenahardforkwasimplementedintheaftermathoftheDAOhackleadingtothesplitbetweenEthereum(ETH)andEthereumClassic(ETC)-withETCmaintainingtheBlockchainwiththestolenmoneystillwiththehackers