Even in lean athletes dieting does not have to cost muscle mass.

no

What about fasting and eating / skipping breakfast - does it hamper or promote weight loss?

Breakfast and Circadian Rhythm Breakfast and Circadian Rhythm

Does Meal Timing Matter? Does Meal Timing Matter?

Breakfast & Glucose Metab. Breakfast & Glucose Metab.

Breaking the Fast, Cardio & the Brain Breaking the Fast, Cardio & the Brain

Does the Break- Fast-Myth Break? Does the Break- Fast-Myth Break?

Breakfast? (Un?) Biased Review Breakfast? (Un?) Biased Review

Figure 1: Changes in body fat and lean mass in grams (Huovinen. 2014)

Figure 2: Pre- and post protein, fat and carbohydrate intake (in g/kg/day) according to subjects' food logs which had to be kept for the whole study period (Huovinen. 2014)

"The counter-movement jump and 20-m sprint time improved consistently (p ≤ 0.05) only in HWR (-700kcal/day), by 2.6 ± 2.5 cm and 0.04 ± 0.04 s, respectively. Finally, athletes with a fat percentage 10% or over at the baseline were able to preserve FFM." (Huovinen. 2014)

"High or Low Protein Intakes Have Profound Influence on Testosterone, SHBG, Estrogen, Cortisol & Co?" (learn more) and

"High Protein Diets Don't Counter Anti-Anabolic Effects of Low Energy Intake" (learn more)

basic

way

Learn more about dieting, here. Bottom line: The results of the study support the use of short , but relatively intense dieting periods. Dieting periods with a 750kcal/day deficit - a deficit that is still only -24% below the baseline intake of the athletes.



What's yet also important is that we don't forget that a dieting principle that works for lean athletes will not necessarily work for an overweight or obese person. The general idea to cut back by 24% and not just 12% (to avoid muscle loss) from carbohydrates and fats while maintaining an optimal protein intake of ~2g/kg body weight is yet something I can whole-heartedly recommend to heavier dieters, as well. The results of the study support the use of, but relatively intense dieting periods. Dieting periods with a 750kcal/day deficit - a deficit that is still only -24% below the baseline intake of the athletes.What's yet also important is that we don't forget that a dieting principle that works for lean athletes will not necessarily work for an overweight or obese person. The general idea to cut back by 24% and not just 12% (to avoid muscle loss) from carbohydrates and fats while maintaining an optimal protein intake of ~2g/kg body weight is yet something I can whole-heartedly recommend to heavier dieters, as well.

Huovinen et al. "Body Composition And Power Performance Improved After Weight Reduction In Male Athletes Without Hampering Hormonal Balance." Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research Publish Ahead of Print DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000619

One of the commonest reasons people don't achieve the physique of their dreams is fear! The fear of losing muscle weight on a "cut" and the fear of gaining fat weight on a "bulk". The study at hand confirms: There is no reason to be afraid of cutting.In the course of the four-week cutting period in the study at hand, the subjects, 20-35 year-old national and international level Finnish track and field male athletes from jumping and short distance running events (e.g. 100-200m) with already low body fat percentages lost another ~2% body fat, andmuscle in spite of a highly significant 750kcal/day deficit.In contrast to the guys who had been randomized to the "high energy deficit" group, the guys who ended up in 300kcal/day deficit group aka the"afraid of losing muscle group", lost neither muscle nor fat weight - and I bet, they did not feel significantly less hungry.The data inwhich is the outcome of a controlled 4-week study in the course of which the subjects were advised to cut fat and carbs and keep their protein intake stable make a clear statement: Trying to cut with a caloric deficit of only 300kcal/day is a waste of time" ... at least for someone who starts with a body fat percentage of only 10%, as the subjects in the study at hand did.As you can see inthe subjects did as they were told and cut back on both fat and carbohydrates - in conjunction with the physical activity this is certainly the key to lean body mass and performance maintenance.Whether that's also the reason that the scientists did not observe significant differences in serum testosterone in either of the two groups is questionable (Testosterone / cortisol: 33.6 (pre) vs. 38.3 (post)), though - especially in view of previous results like those I wrote about in the following two articles:It's more likely that the 27.1kcal/kg of body weight, the subjects in the 700kcal/day diet consumed were still more than enough to cover theenergy requirements. With an average body weight of ~75kg that's still more than 2,000kcal and thusmore than the average starvation diet of the average overweight person will deliver.Reference: