Without greater action to prevent global warming, melting arctic permafrost could cause $70 trillion in economic damages between now and 2300, according to a study published in Nature Communications. What do you think?

“I thought the whole reason we nam ed it permafrost was to make sure it never melted.” Eric Swift • Kiosk Architect


“Thankfully, ‘damage’ really doesn’t sound as bad when you put ‘economic’ in front of it.” Zaine Sloan • Paperwork Reviewer