A corporate presentation made public by WikiLeaks reveals exactly how the energy industry sees pesky climate activists: as a bunch of “radicals,” “realists,” “idealists, and “opportunists.” Also, as a real threat, judging from evidence that Canadian energy giant Suncor hired the consulting firm Strategic Forecasting, or Stratfor, to help it nip populist opposition to development Alberta, Canada’s vast oil reserves—which depends on the controversial Keystone XL Pipeline—in the bud. (Suncor told InsideClimate News that it never hired Stratfor, but its name comes up 11 times in this 35-page presentation, embedded below.)

Over the past two years, WikiLeaks has released millions of emails and memos from the Texas-based Stratfor. The firm bills itself as a purveyor of “geopolitical intelligence,” and WikiLeaks advertises the scoop as a glimpse into the machinations of a for-profit CIA, but Max Fisher at The Atlantic has argued that the firm peddles nothing more exciting than “banal corporate research,” and that it’s “considered a punchline more often than a source of valuable information or insight.” Though its advice to big oil, in this file dated December 2010, is light on geopolitical secrets, it’s rich evidence of how the industry thinks about its foes. When it comes to characterizing the field, Greenpeace is “radical”; the Sierra Club, Amnesty International, and Eartworks are “idealists”; and the Natural Resources Defense Council and WWF are “realists.”

Here are a few of the “Engagement Options” Stratfor suggests:

RAPID NEGOTIATIONS

Rationale: “Gives Suncor the lead on the resolution of the issue.” In the best case scenario, “Campaign ends quickly with a resolution along the lines Suncor had wanted.” In the worst case, “Activists see weakness and press for an unrealistic deal.”

STRUCTURED DIALOGUE

Rationale: “Uses Suncor’s size and importance to force activists to look for softer deal.” In the pro column, “Potentially reduces demand set.” In the con, “Could lead to a direct action campaign that does not necessarily have to be acrimonious.”