Minimum Viable Data Synchronization Source

Authors Oskar Thorén, Dean Eigenmann Status Draft Version 0.6.0

Table of Contents

Abstract

In this specification, we describe a minimum viable protocol for data synchronization inspired by the Bramble Synchronization Protocol. This protocol is designed to ensure reliable messaging between peers across an unreliable peer-to-peer (P2P) network where they may be unreachable or unresponsive.

We present a reference implementation including a simulation to demonstrate its performance.

Definitions

Term Description Peer The other nodes that a node is connected to. Record Defines a payload element of either the type OFFER , REQUEST , MESSAGE or ACK Node Some process that is able to store data, do processing and communicate for MVDS.

Wire Protocol

Secure Transport

This specification does not define anything related to the transport of packets. It is assumed that this is abstracted in such a way that any secure transport protocol could be easily implemented. Likewise, properties such as confidentiality, integrity, authenticity and forward secrecy are assumed to be provided by a layer below.

Payloads

Payloads are implemented using protocol buffers v3.

syntax = "proto3" ; package vac . mvds ; message Payload { repeated bytes acks = 1 ; repeated bytes offers = 2 ; repeated bytes requests = 3 ; repeated Message messages = 4 ; } message Message { bytes group_id = 1 ; int64 timestamp = 2 ; bytes body = 3 ; }

The payload field numbers are kept more “unique” to ensure no overlap with other protocol buffers.

Each payload contains the following fields:

Acks: This field contains a list (can be empty) of message identifiers informing the recipient that sender holds a specific message.

This field contains a list (can be empty) of informing the recipient that sender holds a specific message. Offers: This field contains a list (can be empty) of message identifiers that the sender would like to give to the recipient.

This field contains a list (can be empty) of that the sender would like to give to the recipient. Requests: This field contains a list (can be empty) of message identifiers that the sender would like to receive from the recipient.

This field contains a list (can be empty) of that the sender would like to receive from the recipient. Messages: This field contains a list of messages (can be empty).

Message Identifiers: Each message has a message identifier calculated by hashing the group_id , timestamp and body fields as follows:

HASH("MESSAGE_ID", group_id, timestamp, body);

Group Identifiers: Each message is assigned into a group using the group_id field, groups are independent synchronization contexts between peers.

The current HASH function used is sha256 .

Synchronization

State

We refer to state as set of records for the types OFFER , REQUEST and MESSAGE that every node SHOULD store per peer. state MUST NOT contain ACK records as we do not retransmit those periodically. The following information is stored for records:

Type - Either OFFER , REQUEST or MESSAGE

- Either , or Send Count - The amount of times a record has been sent to a peer.

- The amount of times a record has been sent to a peer. Send Epoch - The next epoch at which a record can be sent to a peer.

Flow

A maximum of one payload SHOULD be sent to peers per epoch, this payload contains all ACK , OFFER , REQUEST and MESSAGE records for the specific peer. Payloads are created every epoch, containing reactions to previously received records by peers or new records being sent out by nodes.

Nodes MAY have two modes with which they can send records: BATCH and INTERACTIVE mode. The following rules dictate how nodes construct payloads every epoch for any given peer for both modes.

NOTE: A node may send messages both in interactive and in batch mode.

Interactive Mode

A node initially offers a MESSAGE when attempting to send it to a peer. This means an OFFER is added to the next payload and state for the given peer.

when attempting to send it to a peer. This means an is added to the next payload and state for the given peer. When a node receives an OFFER , a REQUEST is added to the next payload and state for the given peer.

, a is added to the next payload and state for the given peer. When a node receives a REQUEST for a previously sent OFFER , the OFFER is removed from the state and the corresponding MESSAGE is added to the next payload and state for the given peer.

for a previously sent , the is removed from the state and the corresponding is added to the next payload and state for the given peer. When a node receives a MESSAGE , the REQUEST is removed from the state and an ACK is added to the next payload for the given peer.

, the is removed from the state and an is added to the next payload for the given peer. When a node receives an ACK , the MESSAGE is removed from the state for the given peer.

, the is removed from the state for the given peer. All records that require retransmission are added to the payload, given Send Epoch has been reached.



Figure 1: Delivery without retransmissions in interactive mode.

Batch Mode

When a node sends a MESSAGE , it is added to the next payload and the state for the given peer. When a node receives a MESSAGE , an ACK is added to the next payload for the corresponding peer. When a node receives an ACK , the MESSAGE is removed from the state for the given peer. All records that require retransmission are added to the payload, given Send Epoch has been reached.



Figure 2: Delivery without retransmissions in batch mode.

NOTE: Batch mode is higher bandwidth whereas interactive mode is higher latency.

Retransmission

The record of the type Type SHOULD be retransmitted every time Send Epoch is smaller than or equal to the current epoch.

Send Epoch and Send Count MUST be increased every time a record is retransmitted. Although no function is defined on how to increase Send Epoch , it SHOULD be exponentially increased until reaching an upper bound where it then goes back to a lower epoch in order to prevent a record’s Send Epoch ’s from becoming too large.

NOTE: We do not retransmission ACK s as we do not know when they have arrived, therefore we simply resend them every time we receive a MESSAGE .

Formal Specification

MVDS has been formally specified using TLA+: https://github.com/vacp2p/formalities/tree/master/MVDS.

Changelog

Version Comment 0.6.0 Breaking change to update protocol buffer and field changes. 0.5.2 Breaking change to update protocol buffer and field changes. 0.5.1 Documentation updates: clarifications on spec, RFC-2119 and message identifiers. 0.5.0 Initial Release

Acknowledgments

Preston van Loon

Greg Markou

Rene Nayman

Jacek Sieka

Copyright

Copyright and related rights waived via CC0.