Edit: Some pictures have broken because the domain name expired. I tried to replace a few but some are missing.What is Building 7?Building 7 was a 47-story skyscraper and was part of the World Trade Center complex. Built in 1984, it would have been the tallest high-rise in 33 states in the United States. It collapsed at 5:20 pm on September 11, 2001. It was not hit by an airplane and suffered minimal damage compared to other buildings much closer to the Twin Towers.7 FACTS ABOUT BUILDING 71) If fire caused Building 7 to collapse, it would be the first ever fire-induced collapse of a steel-frame high-rise.2) Building 7’s collapse was not mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report.3) According to a Zogby poll in 2006, 43% of Americans did not know about Building 7.4) It took the federal government seven years to conduct an investigation and issue a report for Building 7.5) 1,700+ architects and engineers have signed a petition calling for a new investigation into the destruction of Building 7, specifying that it should include a full inquiry into the possible use of explosives. 6) Numerous witnesses say the possibility of demolishing Building 7 was widely discussed by emergency personnel at the scene and advocated by the building’s owner.7) Building 7 housed several intelligence and law enforcement agencies, and the NYC Office of Emergency Management’s Emergency Operations Center, more commonly known as “Giuliani’s Bunker”.VIDEO COMPILATION OF BUILDING 7‘S DESTRUCTION (NO SOUND)BUILDING 7 — BEFORE COLLAPSEPhotos of Building 7 in normal conditions:BUILDING 7 — DURING COLLAPSEFor videos of the collapse, click here. BUILDING 7 — AFTER COLLAPSEAerial view of Building 7 after September 11th, 2001.WHAT ABOUT WORLD TRADE CENTER BUILDINGS 3, 4, 5 AND 6?In addition to the Twin Towers and Building 7, the World Trade Center complex included buildings 3, 4, 5, and 6. Compared to Building 7, all of these buildings were severely damaged, first by falling rubble from the tower collapses, then by fires that burned for hours. Although these buildings were in critical condition, none of them collapsed.Source link: rememberbuilding7.org/7-facts-about-building-7/

Here is the top comment with a lot of information.Richard Gage talked about his group, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, which claimed that the World Trade Center was brought down by explosive demolition on September 11, 2001. The group was founded in 2006 and said its mission was to “expose the official lies and cover-up surrounding the events of September 11, 2001 in a way that inspires the people to overcome denial and understand the truth.”Steven Dusterwald, S.E. - Structural Engineer:Mr. Dusterwald presents contradictory evidence between the NIST model and the actual sequence of failures within all the WTC Buildings.Tom Sullivan - Explosives Technician/Loader:Former Explosives Loader for Controlled Demolition, Inc. (CDI) Tom discusses the complex process of preparing a building for controlled demolition and sites the reasons why WTC building 7 had to have been a controlled demolition.Richard Humenn P.E. - WTC Chief Electrical Design Engineer:Mr. Humenn gives us quite a unique perspective inside the elevator shafts in the twin towers and how access to the core columns could have been gained.David Topete, MSCE, S.E., Structural Engineer:Mr. Topete discusses how WTC Building 7's column 79's failure could not have caused the symmetrical and simultaneous collapse into it's own footprint.Kamal Obeid, C.E., S.E. – Civil/Structural Engineer:Mr. Obeid, a 30-year structural engineer explains how NIST's analysis actually disproves it's own theories on how WTC Building 7 collapsed, thereby confirming the use of controlled demolition.Ed Munyak, FPE - Fire Protection Engineer:Mr. Munyak uses his considerable experience as a 25 year Fire Protection Engineer to expose the NIST reports of WTC 1, 2 & 7 as fraudulent.Bob Bowman PhD, Lt. Colonel (ret.):The former head of the Star Wars program under President Ford & Carter, has multiple engineering degrees and agrees that NIST is conducting a massive coverup. (RIP)1999 Presidential Medal of Science award winner, Lynn Margulis PhD:Famed scientist, Lynn Margulis, provides crucial rules and elements within an investigative scientific analysis to procure an accepted hypotheses vs. what's depicted in the NIST report. (RIP)Rudy Dent, 9/11 survivor and former Fire Marshall:32 year veteran of NYC fire department and the NYPD, speaks about his incredible first hand experience of the lies surrounding WTC 7 and gives his professional opinion on the destruction of the buildings with his experience as a Fire Marshall.Robert McCoy - High-Rise Architect:Mr. McCoy expresses his doubt abut the official story and from NIST as to how these 3 skyscrapers were destroyed and calls for a new investigation examining he hypothesis of controlled demolition.Kathy McGrade, B.S -- Metallurgical Engineering:Kathy McGrade explains how normal office fires cannot melt steel and how the symmetrical collapse of all WTC skyscrapers, according to the official story violates the laws of physics and thermodynamics.Ron Brookman, Structural Engineer:Mr. Brookman discusses his direct inquiries with President Obama and NIST on NIST's responsibility to find the cause of the collapse of WTC Building 7 and their responses.Tony Szamboti, M.E. - Mechanical Engineer:Mr. Szamboti provides a comprehensive analysis of the undeniable discrepancies between the NIST report, their modeling and their findings compared to what factual-based evidence exists.Casey Pfeiffer, S.E. – Structural Engineer:Mr. Pfeiffer provides a in-depth look at what actually happened to the top portions of the WTC towers prior to collapse and how WTC 7 could not have experienced simultaneous connector failure without the use of controlled demolition devices.Stephen Barasch - High-Rise Architect:Mr. Barasch discusses his skepticism of this theory of collapse by fire and talks about how one might expect a collapsing high-rise to behave.Les Young High-Rise Architect:This high-rise architect expresses his suspicions that the explanations provided by NIST speculates how the Towers might have fallen if they were to have fallen at all. Further, he analyzes the fire in the buildings.Jerry Lobdill, C.E. - Chemical Engineer, Physicist:Mr. Lobdill presents an in-depth explanation of why the resulting chemical component elements found in the WTC dust, deflagration and steel deformations indicate that incendiaries were used to destroy all 3 WTC skyscrapers.Scott Grainger, FPE - Fire Protection Engineer:Just a few of the thousands who are funding a $300,000 project at the University of Alaska Fairbanks: www.WTC7Evaluation.org