What do you think about the versatility of Leaders? How much should a leader tell the opponent what he should expect from the deck?

As an example Crach an Craite offers with Veterans and Greatswords two archetypes, which work completly differently and each require the enemy to adept their playstyle in a different way and having different counters in the hand.

I'm not talking about niche decks, which intentionally go against the Meta to surprise their opponent.



How much of a core gameplay should each leader have and do you prefer leaders who have more than one distinguishable archetype, or should each distinguishable archetpye have its own leader?