Gold is wreaking havoc with our export statistics.

The government press machine went into overdrive last week as new export figures were released: “The UK is an exporting superpower and these new statistics show that UK companies are exporting record levels of goods and services,” said International Trade Secretary Liz Truss.

Dig beneath the headline figures though – a 5% increase in exports of goods and services last year compared to 2018 – and it turns out the rosy picture does not quite reflect the reality.

Firstly, nearly every year on record has been a ‘record breaking’ year for UK exports. After all, short of a major crash, the UK economy tends to grow year on year:

https://twitter.com/BruceReuters/status/1227217855965470720

In a series of tweets, Sky News’ Economics Editor Ed Conway further revealed just how misleading No 10’s spin on the exports figures really is.

“For the vast majority of history [exports of gold from the UK] were near zero (average monthly level apt £126m). Then, suddenly, in the last two months of last year, gold exports were catapulted higher,” Conway tweeted.

An unexplained two month gold export spike in November and December was roughly equivalent to the GDP of Jamaica:

It has serious consequences. Since comparable records began in 1998, there hasn't been a single month where the UK was a net goods exporter. We've always had a deficit. In December, thanks to the £12bn gold exports, Britain recorded its first monthly trade surplus on record pic.twitter.com/iAJS7BxG4K — Ed Conway (@EdConwaySky) February 14, 2020

So what happened?

The Office for National Statistics are bound by international rules to include gold in the headline numbers. However, that massively distorts them, says Conway: the UK is a world hub for gold trading, so ‘any movement/change of ownership of gold bars counts as imports/exports, even though it’s hardly what anyone would consider an “export”‘.

In other words, a company moving changing the official holding location of the gold they hold from Britain to another country counts as an ‘export’…even if the gold stays in exactly the same UK vaults. (That could happen if a company allocates a portion of its UK gold to a US buyer, for example.)

The ONS does try and be transparent about the distorting nature of gold on UK exports – publishing figures that strip them out – but don’t expect Tory politicians to let that get in the way of a press release:

📢Record breaking year for UK exports.



New @ONS data out today shows that in 2019…



💼UK businesses exported £689.0 bn of goods and services

⬆This is a 5.0% increase on 2018

📈Exports of goods to non-EU countries grew by 13.6%https://t.co/YRerqQGXw7 — Liz Truss (@trussliz) February 11, 2020

According to Conway, ‘every bullet point in Truss’ tweet is wrong if you strip out gold exports’: UK biz exported £674bn of goods & services (not £689). A 2.9% increase on 2018 (lowest since 2016; not 5.0%) [and] we don’t know how much exports to non-EU countries rose; ONS hasn’t worked them out ex-gold.”

The likely reason appears to be that A US bank with London gold vaults shifted some of its gold from being ‘unallocated’ to being ‘allocated’: “The gold stayed in the same vault but technically it shifted from UK ownership to US. In other words, a couple of clicks in a bank’s spreadsheet caused the biggest fluctuation in Britain’s trade figures in modern history. At least that’s the most plausible explanation,” Conway said.

LFF spoke to several accounting experts – including LFF contributing editor Prof Prem Sikka who said the analysis stacked up.

“[This] was little more than a notional change of ownership of gold that sat on the same shelf before and after its supposed ‘export’ took place – [and] does seem to have had a material impact on the UK’s trade statistics. This is absurd,” Richard Murphy, Professor of Practice in International Political Economy, at City University told Left Foot Forward.

“What actually happened was a notional change of ownership of an asset that has no impact on the UK’s well being. What is more, it reflected nothing that was really made. The sale of this gold certainly added no value.

“What is needed then is a system that ensures that if such anomalies arise they can be identified, noted and removed from the reported trade data as what are called in accounting terms ‘exceptional items’. We expect commercial accounting to do this. It’s entirely reasonable to think the government might do the same, albeit that it should also report that it has happened to prevent abuse taking place.

“We deserve national income accounting that really reflects what happens in our economy. It seems that we are not getting it,” Prof Murphy told LFF.

Of course, the Tories’ right-wing attack dogs didn’t waste any time parroting the misleading figures…

Josiah Mortimer is Co-Editor of Left Foot Forward.

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.