Mr Felt



Offline



Activity: 494

Merit: 518









Hero MemberActivity: 494Merit: 518 Re: Part 3  Much more on why clues suggest Peter Todd is probably Satoshi January 27, 2016, 01:55:37 PM

Last edit: January 27, 2016, 02:08:24 PM by Mr Felt #8 Quote from: gmaxwell on January 27, 2016, 12:24:26 PM Quote from: jonald_fyookball on January 27, 2016, 06:48:15 AM Doubt it.His view on block size debate is pretty different than

your own fevered imagination, you mean.



on this subject; the topic is boring. It doesn't matter who Bitcoin's creator is... the design of the system was intended to eliminate third party trust; give it some respect by respecting it's creator's desire for privacy.

your own fevered imagination, you mean.on this subject;. It doesn't matter who Bitcoin's creator is... the design of the system was intended to eliminate third party trust; give it some respect by respecting it's creator's desire for privacy.

Welcome to Felt's lair.



You find determining Satoshi's hacker boring? Why were you sharing part2 on bitcoin-wizards IRC the other day (Jan 22) and calling it "entertaining" or something? Why do you want to cover up for Satoshi's hacker?

Quote

hehe, trolls on reddit are sometimes entertaining:

2:32 am

"Personally I like the idea of hashcash if, and only if, it's structured like a real currency as opposed to simply proof of work. In the real world you pay for resources used. In many cases this should also apply to P2P and other computer systems.

2:32 am

Of course getting hashcash workable as a real currency is extremely difficult. I've thought of a scheme that would work (coins are signed by owner and can only be changed (signed to a different owner) by owner) except you need a decentralized "central" database of all the hashcash that's been minted. Unworkable. !@#$ spend-twice problem. " ... Peter Todd in 2001, on a mailing list with Hal and

2:33 am

Adam Back

2:33 am

...

2:35 am gmaxwell2:32 am"Personally I like the idea of hashcash if, and only if, it's structured like a real currency as opposed to simply proof of work. In the real world you pay for resources used. In many cases this should also apply to P2P and other computer systems.2:32 amOf course getting hashcash workable as a real currency is extremely difficult. I've thought of a scheme that would work (coins are signed by owner and can only be changed (signed to a different owner) by owner) except you need a decentralized "central" database of all the hashcash that's been minted. Unworkable. !@#$ spend-twice problem." ... Peter Todd in 2001, on a mailing list with Hal and2:33 amAdam Back2:33 am http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/bluesky/2001 ...2:35 am Welcome to Felt's lair.You find determining Satoshi's hacker boring? Why were you sharing part2 on bitcoin-wizards IRC the other day (Jan 22) and calling it "entertaining" or something? Why do you want to cover up for Satoshi's hacker?