Let’s start by clearing up some nomenclature. The tax bill is not tax reform.

Tax reform — oh, that sounds so wonderful. Every terrible provision in the bill is sanitized by saying it is tax reform. What the Republican Senate bill is, is a big whopping gift to corporations and the very wealthy.

ADVERTISEMENT

But you ask, “How about those tax cuts for the ordinary working man and woman?” Those reductions for individuals are temporary. The reductions for corporations are permanent.



You remember Donald Trump during the campaign railing against “carried interest?” The concept of taxing the profits of hedge fund billionaires not as ordinary income but less. That is untouched in the bill.

How about the elimination of the estate tax? That would benefit the super-rich, just .02 percent of the nation’s population. In this bill, this onerous burden would be eliminated.

If that’s not enough, how about doing away with the ObamaCare individual mandate? That’s a real “great” idea. That way the government would spend less on Medicaid — premiums would rise 10 percent a year, and 4 million people would lose their health insurance coverage by 2019 and, by 2027, the total would go up to 13 million.

To those who are worried that all this tax cutting might be fiscally irresponsible, the Republicans have a neat solution. Down the road, under the rubric of “entitlement reform” (another “reform”), they would start cutting essential programs that ordinary people count on, such as Medicare and Social Security.

All of this awful stuff is being done without one hearing.

The Senate Republicans aren’t interested in a bipartisan bill, nor is President Trump Donald John TrumpBubba Wallace to be driver of Michael Jordan, Denny Hamlin NASCAR team Graham: GOP will confirm Trump's Supreme Court nominee before the election Southwest Airlines, unions call for six-month extension of government aid MORE. They say they are, but they don’t mean it.

The plan is to get something to the floor and quickly use majority control (52 votes) and pass it. That way they can say they’ve done something this year.

They are smarting from their failure to repeal ObamaCare. The GOP desperately needs a victory. Any victory will do.

What’s in the tax bill is not nearly as important as passing a bill. That’s how vacuous and devious the entire enterprise has become.

Now, there are supposedly reluctant GOP senators who have problems with the bill.

Sens. Ron Johnson Ronald (Ron) Harold JohnsonThis week: Supreme Court fight over Ginsburg's seat upends Congress's agenda GOP set to release controversial Biden report Democrats fear Russia interference could spoil bid to retake Senate MORE of Wisconsin and Bob Corker Robert (Bob) Phillips CorkerHas Congress captured Russia policy? Tennessee primary battle turns nasty for Republicans Cheney clashes with Trump MORE of Tennessee have been mentioned prominently. So has Sen. Steve Daines Steven (Steve) David DainesMcConnell locks down key GOP votes in Supreme Court fight Will Republicans' rank hypocrisy hinder their rush to replace Ginsburg? Toobin: McConnell engaging in 'greatest act of hypocrisy in American political history' with Ginsburg replacement vote MORE of Montana. But when it finally comes down to voting no, will they have the guts to do it?

I believe they will buckle and fold. That leaves it up to Sens. Jeff Flake Jeffrey (Jeff) Lane FlakeJeff Flake: Republicans 'should hold the same position' on SCOTUS vacancy as 2016 Republican former Michigan governor says he's voting for Biden Maybe they just don't like cowboys: The president is successful, some just don't like his style MORE of Arizona, Susan Collins Susan Margaret CollinsGraham: GOP will confirm Trump's Supreme Court nominee before the election Gardner signals support for taking up Supreme Court nominee this year Tumultuous court battle upends fight for Senate MORE of Maine and John McCain John Sidney McCainBiden's six best bets in 2016 Trump states Replacing Justice Ginsburg could depend on Arizona's next senator The Hill's Morning Report - Sponsored by Facebook - Washington on edge amid SCOTUS vacancy MORE of Arizona.

Flake could back up his gutsy words with real backbone by voting no.

McCain could pull a McCain: Vote no again, just like he did with the repeal of ObamaCare.There are a few others muttering dissent. Sen. James Lankford James Paul LankfordMcConnell works to lock down GOP votes for coronavirus bill Charities scramble to plug revenue holes during pandemic Warren calls for Postal Service board members to fire DeJoy or resign MORE of Oklahoma has been talking a good game. But will he really buck his party and vote his convictions?

Even Sen. Chuck Grassley Charles (Chuck) Ernest GrassleyGardner signals support for taking up Supreme Court nominee this year Grassley, Ernst pledge to 'evaluate' Trump's Supreme Court nominee McConnell digs in on vow to fill Ginsburg's Supreme Court seat MORE of Iowa has expressed reservations.

When it is all over, I’m not the least bit optimistic. The Republicans so crave a “win” they will pass anything and call it a “win” for the ordinary Joe.

The content of any legislation, as we know, this president doesn’t know about or care about. He just wants to say he “did the deal.”

This deal is bad for the American taxpayer. Real bad.

Its purpose is fundamentally to further enhance the rich and well-off and basically screw those who don’t have deep pockets.

It is in no way reform. It is a big fat wet kiss to the donor class that continues to fund and favor the GOP.

GOP really stands for Grand Old Plutocracy.

Mark Plotkin is a contributor to the BBC on American politics and a columnist for The Georgetowner. He previously worked as the political analyst for WAMU-FM, Washington’s NPR affiliate, and for WTOP-FM, Washington’s all-news radio station. He is a winner of the Edward R. Murrow Award for excellence in writing.