On the debut episode of ‘Bring it to the Table’, Peter Rosenberg, JBL and Paul Heyman debated on all of the latest stories and topics in WWE. Rosenberg played the role as the voice of the fans as he asked the two wrestling legends questions about the current state of WWE.

Heyman was noticeably annoyed with some of the comments from Rosenberg, speaking the mind of some fans. Heyman argued that fans should try to effect change instead of complaining about it.

Heyman took to twitter to explain more of what he meant:

I can see where some won’t like @HeymanHustle complaining about the “internet fans,” on #BringItToTheTable but he was right in everything. — Chris Slater (@chris_slater) January 3, 2017

. @chris_slater I never said “internet fans.” Never said “IWC.” I don’t pigeon hole fans – customers – viewers into categories. — Paul Heyman (@HeymanHustle) January 3, 2017

. @chris_slater #PeterRosenberg represented “the fans’ point of view” by bitching, moaning and complaining. Want change? EFFECT change! — Paul Heyman (@HeymanHustle) January 3, 2017

. @chris_slater Change was effected with @WWEDanielBryan because of an uprising. A revolution by the audience. I applaud that. — Paul Heyman (@HeymanHustle) January 3, 2017

[irp posts=”18981″ name=”Paul Heyman and JBL Address Critics That Say RAW Should Only Be 2 Hours”]

. @chris_slater But when everything is nitpicked by Rosenberg, and he reps the fans, it’s kvetching. #BringItToTheTable @WWENetwork — Paul Heyman (@HeymanHustle) January 3, 2017

Some pretty interesting comments. Is Paul Heyman right? If WWE fans are unhappy with the product, they need to show it by not giving the company any of their money. Many times we hear fans say that they are never watching RAW again, but still tune in the next week regardless.

Let us know what you think in the comment section below!