Perhaps the most important question of the modern era: Is white culture being replaced?

To answer this sufficiently, one must define equitably two separate parts of this phrasing: Culture and white culture.

What is culture? No offense—thus far—to the neo-Marxist SJWs, but I cut my teeth on a stronger cloth than most regular folks, and dare I say all the safe-space troupe. Rather than nodding my noggin in agreement with pinko professors professing their undying adoration for the deadliest political system perhaps in human history, I studied in laboratory conditions at a Science & Tech campus en route to a master’s degree in evolutionary biology, microbiology previous (B.S.). So what we learned about culture was—and still is, of course—undoubtedly dissimilar by degrees from what the soft liberal arts learned.

Understand that “culture” was one of the first terms redefined by Marxists. I have my suspicions as to why, into which we need not tediously delve; my point: We learned culture was the foundational underpinnings of societies – your advancement for the greater good of your tribe, which includes how you go about fixing water and food supplies, and food safety, and rule of law, and personal property rights; that sort of thing.

Other folks learned that other, less important things made up culture: Clothing and food and dance and your holidays.

Notice the difference between the two? One is a concrete foundation on which society can be orderly constructed; the other is a group of trends which can—and do—change, and change often – often on a whim or via the powers that be or whatever is most popular with the populous.

So when I think about (white) culture, I think about the first-world. You know, all of those (coincidentally white) nations liberals love to show you when they speak about lower gun crime in Norway, Denmark, Australia, New Zealand, etc, vs. the United States. I think about the developed world, Western civilization.

When other people think about culture, they think about Mexican sombreros and Kwanzaa decorations and the latest Lil’ Whoever rap song.

In short: They’re wrong.

They’re wrong because they have to be wrong, at the risk of begging the question. You cannot say a trend is a culture. How can something be culture if that something is in a state of perpetual flux?

“Curry is Indian culture,” someone will shout. You mean a dish that’s made differently by every household everywhere is somehow culture? Same with pizza being Italian culture, or musical trends that change every decade – you see where this is going. Even the arts. Look at what we consider “art” these days. Holy shit. That’s culture? No. These things are topical trends of cultures, not cultures themselves.

Evidenced by the fact that every culture can adopt a music trend or a recipe, but not everyone can adopt proper sanitation and clean water.

Cultures are firmly rooted, to the point you cannot change the culture without changing its people. Everything else is the window dressing on top.

Foundations vs. facades.

Unfortunately, other definitions are going to be changed too. Others are being changed right before our eyes, like “racism” and “nationalist,” and especially “diversity.” And it’s the same forces behind it.

So, what is white culture?

This section will be much more shorter and succinct, to be sure. White culture is the western world. The first-world west. Even nations that are nonwhite, which have their own examples of a first-world culture, got there by emulating exactly what the west was doing – Japan and South Korea, and China, too, if ever it could stop stepping on its communist dick.

Like it or not, butthurt or need a safe space or perhaps a ba-ba to suckle as you hug the nearest ally you can find, white people erected through thousands of years of trial, error and actual work, the concrete foundations of an ordered, modern, first-world culture. It’s why we see only white nations, save two, considered the “modern world.”

It’s not Christianity. 1) We were the west and building toward modernity while still polytheist. No issue there. If anything, Abrahamic monotheism crippled Rome and set us back a thousand years. 2) Like curry, which version? There’s like 45,000 from which you can choose, and none of them give you liberal values like freedom of religion and speech, nor do they separate and allow man to rule over himself.

White culture is the inherent order and cooperation necessary to advance, to push forward. Other cultures lack that drive. Never mind the IQ question; a beaver doesn’t need to join Mensa to build a proper dam. People in the third-world evolved in chaos and thrive therein; that’s just their damn dam. For whatever reasons, they remain incapable of reproducing the concrete foundations necessary on which to build upon the sorts of structures necessary to construct great, modern cultures.

So they flee to our culture, which is the point of this article. They flock to our nations en masse, they keep their customs and their languages, and their behaviors which forged their cultures, and they superimpose their dams over ours. Time and again, from every country, when speaking about aggregate immigration, there is no assimilation.

Individually? Sure. Undoubtedly quite a few of those in the Honduran migrant caravans are traveling to America because they want to be Americans. But most wave their Honduran flags and want to exist as Hondurans inside of America, not as Americans.

Every Latin-majority protest, parade or event you see, you see every flag but America’s. In the UK, I never see Union Jack proudly ripplin’ in the breeze when “diversity” gathers. I see an amalgam of Middle Eastern nation states’ pennants being waved about to spite intentionally their host nation.

And sorry to say—or rather, sorry this is the case—but we’re working on a principle of displacement here, whereby every single person to build their shitty dam over-top ours is objectively displacing ours.

I’ve written before, in length (if you can believe it), about how hard it is to keep the first-world running smoothly, compared to how easy it is to exist in the third-world. Make sure you avoid bad people, don’t starve to death vs. that, plus getting up to work; paying your bills; running maintenance on your property and municipalities and public utilities; and inoculating your children and educating them and forming them into moral, well-adjusted adults; maintaining legal standards; operating a functional economy and commerce; and infrastructure; and on it goes.

And that’s if you just want to stay level and maintain what you have, not to mention the extras associated with doing better and making more of yourself.

I find no clever way to segue at 5a.m. so I’m just going to name-drop Sargon of Akkad here, and the reason is that it frustrates me that he’s halfway there, but not quite.

Until the White 85ers known as the alt-right crawled up out the woodwork, most liberal-minded people were in agreement that it was the neo-Marxists behind all of this in order to dismantle white supremacist capitalist patriarchy and to usher in their socialist utopia, with all the cheap brown labor their corporate masters deemed appropriate. So white man bad, white man evil, white man die, the future is brown!

Now it’s the Jews. Why? Because Hitler did nothing wrong and was just trying to save the entire white race from the subversive merchants.

In all seriousness, I do have a point of dragging Sargon into an article. I’ve watched his videos since he had 4,000 subscribers and dogshit audio that you’d have to turn up so loud that you’d have to press F for your eardrums if YouTube auto-played to the next vid.

I’ve seen him do videos sarcastically shredding shithole cultures.

Though I don’t think he’s come around yet to the correct position that culture is necessarily genetic, as culture is little more than a manifestation of a tribe’s behaviors. And behavior is genetic. Hell, there’s even this entire cool branch of science about just that…

This troubles me because I see all the beef that’s currently popping off on YouTube. I’m a YouTuber myself, albeit not at all popular. My current channel, which has two community guideline strikes and is on a stream ban, barely has 900 subs. Not an influencer; a level-one noob. Sargon’s got nearly a million subs, and is a legit political activist, but he, like the alt-right, is missing the mark.

Sargon has the right target, in my opinion. But never mind me. I just spent years of my life creating a scientific model of utility which perfectly mirrors reality. The point is that these two sides could actually come together to do some damage, if the alt-right let go of the everything-wrong-in-the-world-is-the-Jews nonsense, and if Sargon came around to caring and speaking more about cultural displacement, dispossession, and the loss of something bigger than classical liberal values: Our nations entire.

I think of effective political activism like I think of effective medicine. You go to the doctor and say you’re lethargic, have a rash, are getting dizzy, don’t have an appetite, etc. Doctors do tests, tell you that you have one of the myriad liquid (blood) cancers, Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. So they give you chemo and radiation and all the workups to treat the disease.

Turns out, however, when you die, you had lupus all along!

Effective political activism, like effective medicine, diagnoses properly the illness and treats accordingly that diagnosis. Sargon has the right cancer picked out, but he’s missing the breadth of its metastasis. So while he’s focusing on shooting those beams into one area, another is overwrought with cancer.

The alt-right miss entirely the diagnosis. They’re on some other shit. Like SJWs LARP as communist revolutionaries, the alt-right are busy trying to be (((clever))) and tie everything in to making Hitler a hero and the Jew’s removal the world’s solve-all.

But, at least in my rationalizing of the two sides, I do believe Sargon could influence them away from such sweeping generalizations about the Jews and get many of them back on target if he himself would actually come around to seeing the entire scope—the immediate danger—of… well, white genocide, I think it’s safe at this point to call it.

White culture is objectively being replaced. Little by little, wave by wave, caravan by caravan, white people hold less power in nations their ancestors created, are victims of more crimes, are losing their voting power, and are losing their homelands.

Yes, Virginia, there is a such thing as white culture, and it’s on the endangered species list.

I wish someone with the social influence of a Sargon of Akkad would slide over to this realization, at the risk of being thought alt-right, solely because it is the demonstrable reality of the west in its current state. As an added bonus, I also think he could bring a lot of focus back onto the neo-Marxists and off this Jew boogeyman.

Maybe I’m wrong. Been wrong before, will be wrong again. But, damn, it’d be nice to see people who are fighting at cross purposes, and each in their own way missing the mark, come together a little more so we can science the shit out of this like good medicine!