Strzok-Page Text Redacted by FBI, But Not by OIG, Shows Couple Discussing Possible Overseas Spying in 2015 It's not just that they were discussing this. It's that the FBI, the organization we're supposed to trust so much, is hiding information they know damn well is relevant to congressional investigations not for national security reasons but only because if reflects badly on them. The leftist/NeverTrump defense here is that we don't know they were discussing siccing overseas spies on the Trump campaign; they might have been discussing deploying the overseas spies in any of a dozen other investigations. The leftist/NeverTrump defense here is that we don'tthey were discussing siccing overseas spies on the; they might have been discussing deploying the overseas spies in any of a dozen other investigations. True. True. But the FBI redacted this for some reason, didn't they? But the FBI redacted this forreason, didn't they? People cover up abuses. They don't cover up business as usual. People cover up abuses. They don't cover up business as usual. 1) BOMBSHELL- From DECEMBER 2015�The word LURES is redacted by FBI but not OIG



"OCONUS LURES"



OCONUS= Outside Contiguous US



LURES= In this context LURES = SPIES - multiple



Is this an admission that the FBI wanted to run a baited Sting Op using foreign agents against Trump? pic.twitter.com/OtLxlOEGsV — Falco (@Nick_Falco) 4. lipnja 2018.

2) Kevin Brock (FMR ASST DIR OF COUNTER-INTELLIGENCE FBI)



"If the FBI opened a Source or tasked a Source to gather information particulary from a US person, before opening a formal investigation, then that would be a violation of the guidelines."



Looks like we have a VIOLATION pic.twitter.com/k3yLenf1wh — Falco (@Nick_Falco) 4. lipnja 2018.



Trump jumped on this, prematurely: Trump jumped on this, prematurely: Wow, Strzok-Page, the incompetent & corrupt FBI lovers, have texts referring to a counter-intelligence operation into the Trump Campaign dating way back to December, 2015. SPYGATE is in full force! Is the Mainstream Media interested yet? Big stuff! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) 6. lipnja 2018.



Again, we don't know for a fact, yet, that they were discussing "oconus lures" with respect to the Trump campaign specifically. Again, we don't know for a fact,, that they were discussing "oconus lures" with respect to the Trump campaign specifically. But were I betting man, I'd bet stacks of money that's what we find out this refers to. I'd guess it specifically refers to trying to "lure" Flynn into a compromising conversation. But were I betting man, I'd bet stacks of money that's what we find out this refers to. I'd guess it specifically refers to trying to "lure" Flynn into a compromising conversation. And I think it's pretty obvious that Stephan Halper was one such "oconus lure," though not necessarily one of the oconus lures the kompromat couple was trying to get approved. And I think it's pretty obvious that Stephan Halper was one such "oconus lure," though not necessarily one of the oconus lures the kompromat couple was trying to get approved. Posted by: Ace of Spades at 12:25 PM











MuNuvians MeeNuvians Polls! Polls! Polls! Frequently Asked Questions The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick Top Top Tens Greatest Hitjobs News/Chat