So the inevitable has happened and Boris is Prime Minister. How long he lasts is another matter – it’s probably safe to say that on the 1st November we will either be out of the EU or Boris will be out of office. It’s going to be a fascinating three months; our new PM’s patriotic, Churchillian ebullience is both entertaining and infectious – but there is nothing good in it for our vision of Britain.

Much has been made of the new Cabinet’s “diversity”; here’s a typical headline (this one is from the Telegraph) “This diverse Cabinet exemplifies the global-minded spirit which drove Britain to vote Leave”. Here’s another “The best thing about Boris Johnson’s ‘diverse’ Cabinet is that its diversity is irrelevant” (in which case, one might wonder, why waste an article writing about it?). And another: “Britain’s Trump? Boris Johnson will prove himself to be a cosmopolitan liberal”.

And indeed Boris has wasted no time in proving himself to be just that – a cosmopolitan liberal. In his two and a half hour address to Parliament on Thursday he extolled the benefits (as he sees them) of immigration, removed the cap on skilled migration, revoked the pledge to reduce immigration to below 100,000 (which, as George Osborne has reminded us, the Tories never really believed in), and pledged to amnesty the million or so illegals thought to be currently in the country. This proposed amnesty will empower the newly legitimised illegals to import their families under Human Rights Laws, and you can no doubt imagine the baby boom which will follow the joyful reunions. Such is the charm and magnetism of Boris that I have little doubt that many – particularly Conservative supporters – who were previously anti-immigration will be persuaded to change their minds, at least until his star fades.

The first headline quoted above, the one which claims that it was our “global minded spirit which drove Britain to vote Leave” exemplifies a new narrative about the Brexit vote. Until recently it was assumed that uncontrolled mass immigration gave rise to UKIP, which panicked Cameron into offering a referendum, and the rest is history. The new version now emerging is that it was NOT about reducing immigration, it was rather the reverse; it was about making Britain “outward looking”, “open”, “internationalist”, “welcoming”, “global”. You will have heard these words, or variants of them, repeatedly in the mouths of Tory politicians over the last few months and they all mean the same thing – open and welcoming to more immigration.

This new narrative thus plays perfectly into Boris’ great liberalisation of our borders. His alternative to our existing leaky controls is to hand over control to the immigrants themselves! That is what his proposed “Australian style points system” (also proposed by the Brexit Party) actually does – if you have enough points you can come in; it’s in your own hands not the hands of our government or any immigration officer. It’s worth noting that the Australian system was designed to increase immigration, and that is what happened when the Labour government tried such a system in the UK early this century.

So there is Boris’ biggest joke – we voted for Brexit to reduce immigration and we end up with a Prime Minister eager to increase it! I often wonder why a party, the Conservative, which likes to portray itself as the party of the nation, is permanently dominated by liberal internationalists who are distinctly immigration friendly. No doubt it’s mainly about money – those who fund the Tory party like immigration because it provides them with cheap labour. Neither those money men, nor those who rise to the top in the Conservative party, appear to have any understanding of a country as the homeland of a particular people, to them it is merely an economy.

Mention of the “homeland of a particular people” reminds me of a piece by Greg Johnson which I read recently on his Counter Currents site. Describing himself as a “National Populist” he said that the object of the populist movement must be create a homeland for White people in North America, particularly for people like the sixty million Whites who voted for Trump. He is hardly alone in wanting an all-White homeland in North America, and in the limitless spaces of the continent there would be room for such an entity (although how to get from here to there is another matter!). For we here in Britain, there is no country-sized territory to be hived off for ourselves alone; and why should we? Every square inch of our land is ours. Until such time as we can recover our country, we must inhabit an “internal” homeland, a Racial Nationalist organisation of the like-minded supporting each other in the manner of an organised ethnic minority, because that is what we may well become.

By Frederick Dixon © 2019

# # # #

JOIN WESTERN SPRING

Western Spring is not just a website. We are a community of people dedicated to achieving the Six Prerequisites and thereby acquiring the wherewithal needed to win political power and through that secure the future survival, proliferation and advancement of the British people and other White peoples of European descent, wherever they may live. Please join us:

[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]

# # # #