Her campaign tweeted the document, which calls for Bloomberg and his company to release individuals from any agreements that bar them “from disclosing information related to sexual harassment, discrimination, or other misconduct at the Company or by Bloomberg himself.”

“If he’s not willing to remove those gags and let those women—and maybe those men—talk, then he is disqualified from being president of the United States,” Warren said Thursday, adding that, when push comes to shove, she will support whoever the Democratic nominee happens to be because literally anyone is better than Trump. But, she said, “what we’ve got right now is a chance for the Nevada voters to make sure that Michael Bloomberg is not our nominee, and that’s what I’m asking.”

Bloomberg, of course, is about as likely to sign the document as he is to announce at the next debate that he thinks Warren’s wealth tax is a great idea. On Wednesday, he insisted that his company has “very few nondisclosure agreements,” all of which he suggested were signed “consensually,” adding that none of the agreements accuse him of any wrongdoing “other than maybe they didn’t like a joke I told.” (Among the alleged jokes: that he told a woman who announced she was pregnant to “kill it,“ and told another, of her boyfriend, “Keep him happy with a good [oral sex].”) Bloomberg also claimed that the NDAs were signed because the parties involved all decided the wanted to keep the details “quiet.”

Yet, according to a report from ABC News, that may not be the case for at least some of those involved:

ABC News has spoken with several women who expressed interest in telling their stories, but feared the prospect of retribution from the company, including significant financial losses for violating the terms of their confidentiality agreement by speaking out. Donna Clancy, an attorney for three former employees who have sued both Bloomberg and his firm, said if the women were to break their NDAs, the “terms and conditions say that they would suffer the consequences.”