

Science Errors

Mathematical and Evidence-Based Proof

Explained For Nonscientists

Energy Misdefined Global Warming Contrived

Gary Novak

Independent Scientist

Liberal Progressive

Seattle, WA

Science is overwhelmed by incompetent scientists who do not understand the abstractions of scientific knowledge. They use science to rationalize their errors instead of correct them. Journalists brought fake science to the surface and suppressed real science.

Here's why there is no such thing as a greenhouse effect in the atmosphere:

All matter emits radiation constantly including the atmosphere, which is a cooling mechanism. There is no trapping with radiation emission. Conservatives are wrong about it.



The use of the word trapping is a fraud upon the public designed to create the subject of greenhouse gases existing in the atmosphere. Without the word trapping, the subject does not exist. With the atmosphere emitting radiation constantly, the air will cool 10 to 20 degrees in a few hours during clear nights, because a transparent gas emits radiation much more readily that an opaque solid such as the surface of the earth. With heat moving through the atmosphere that fast, a small amount isn't going to be trapped in place. Fake math was used as the supposedly definitive physics upon which the science of greenhouse effects is based. It's called Radiative Transfer Equations.



Only one CO2 molecule in 2,500 air molecules (at 400 parts per million CO2) is absorbing the unusual radiation.



If five air molecules radiate away the added energy, while one CO2 molecule absorbs, the added energy is gone and the other 2,495 air molecules surrounding each CO2 molecule are not affected. There cannot be a significant temperature increase in the atmosphere when 2,495 air molecules surrounding each CO2 molecule are unaffected by the process. In other words, each carbon dioxide molecule would have to be 2,495°C to average 1°C temperature increase, but the CO2 would only be 0.03°C warmer than the surrounding air molecules.



Normally emitted radiation (black body infrared radiation) is 12 times stronger than the radiation absorbed by carbon dioxide. It means the energy is emitted as fast as it is absorbed. Absorbed radiation in the atmosphere is re-emitted in 83 femto seconds, average. Heat absorbed by everything else in the atmosphere is re-emitted in 83 femto seconds, average. There is no difference. What then is trapping heat in the atmosphere? (Heat can accumulate in the atmosphere short-term, because conduction and convection can put heat into the atmosphere faster than radiation can emit it; but radiation does not put heat into the atmosphere faster than radiation can emit it.) It means there is no such thing as a greenhouse gas trapping heat in the atmosphere. There are other explanations for weather effects. The atmosphere cannot heat the oceans, because there is not enough heat capacity in the atmosphere. The Math.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is not science. It is designed by politicians for political purposes with the result being dictated by politicians. The few scientists involved do no more than contrive scientific legitimacy where there is none. Any real scientists who get involved either quit in disgust or are kicked out for criticizing the process. Any who remain do not have enough respect for real science to be called real scientists. Climate is too random and complex for scientific measurement. That's why fakes have nothing but modeling. It's not a science tool, it's a propaganda tool. Modeling is a lot like painting in that it is not a measurement, it's a synthesis.

Energy Misdefined Simple and unquestionable mathematical proof shows energy has been misdefined in physics. The representation of kinetic energy being used is mass times velocity squared ( ½mv² ), when it should be mass times velocity unsquared ( mv ), momentum. The consequence is that everything in physics which involves energy is in error, which includes at least 90% of physics. The resulting physics functions as super engineering but not science. Engineers make the best estimate possible and describe the procedure in terms which reproduce a similar result. Each problem is met with a fix which gets to the desired result. The end result determines the adequacy. Science is vastly different from engineering, as it attempts to produce basic knowledge determining universal laws which always hold true without errors. This means, scientific results are broadly applicable, where engineering is limited to a specific result under limited conditions. And science enhances judgement and predictability, where engineering must be tested for each set of conditions, which means "trial-and-error" testing. Mathematical Proof Of Energy Misdefined Experiments cannot determine the correct definition of energy, because elastic force cannot be separated from inelastic force in experimental results. So pure mathematics is needed. By using rockets as a substitute for gravity, simple mathematics shows the proof. Physicists used a falling object test in an improper manner starting with false assumptions. Here is proof applying simple rocket math to the same test that physicists used proving that they were wrong and momentum (mv) is the real kinetic energy. Explanation of Concept: Energy is defined as "that which is conserved during transformations." Conserved means totals stay the same when components are re-arranged. So the test for the definition of kinetic energy is to re-arrange the components and see which total stays the same. Part 1: Kinetic energy is not ½mv²: A 4kg object dropped 1m (meter) has the same amount of ½mv² as a 1kg object dropped 4m, because force times distance equals ½mv² for an accelerating mass. But a rocket accelerating the masses to those velocities requires twice as much energy as fuel for the large mass as for the small one. Rocket burn time:

large mass: 1.77177876722800 seconds

small mass: 0.88588938361400 seconds Therefore, both masses do not have the same energy; the rocket does not transform energy in proportion to ½mv²; ½mv² is not kinetic energy; and a gallon of fuel does not produce a consistent amount of ½mv². Part 2: Kinetic energy is mv: A 4kg object dropped for 1s (second) has the same amount of mv (momentum) as a 1kg object dropped for 4s, because force times time equals mv for an accelerating mass. A rocket accelerating the masses to those velocities uses the same amount of energy as fuel for both masses. Rocket burn time:

large mass: 3.92400000000000 seconds

small mass: 3.92400000000000 seconds Therefore, both masses have the same amount of energy; the rocket transforms energy in proportion to mv; mv is kinetic energy; and a gallon of fuel produces a consistent amount of mv. All logic and evidence of energy point to the same conclusion. The logic created the need to derive the mathematical proof. About ninety percent of physics is corrupted by the error. Energy Misdefined Today's temperature is 5.77λR2/dθ3T4 ,

becoming λR/755·T/γ3θ by tomorrow. Gary Novak

Mushroom Physiologist

Evolution Biologist

Liberal Progressive

Seattle, WA About the Author

Graduate Research

Morel Mushroom Research gn37@nov79.com