"The proposed Marriage Law Amendment Bill, already approved by the Indian cabinet, to ensure more benefit to divorcee women has drawn different opinions about it in India. However, in a contrast development in China 9 months back, a similar property law had to be amended by Chinese Supreme Court. As per a report published in ‘The Telegraph (UK)’, ‘with divorce rates soaring, and widespread worries about a new culture of hyper-materialism, the Chinese government is now trying to stop women marrying for money. In a bid to temper the rising expectations of Chinese women, China's Supreme Court has now ruled that from now on, the person who buys the family home, or the parents who advance them the money, will get to keep it after divorce’."

The Marriage Law Amendment bill or MAD bill, as it is being referred to in many facebook and other social networks by shocked Indians, is being driven by a few women’s rights groups, who have also held the country hostage earlier during the amendment of section 498a which was ordered by the Honourable SC itself.

Dissatisfied that the DV act did not turn out to be the property grabbing law that thought it would become after the famous Batra vs Batra judgement of the Honourable Supreme Court, the Indian Feminists are now lobbying for the even more biased and dangerous Marriage Law Amendment Bill , brought in with little debate. The bill which proposes to divide the property of the husband as if cheese cake and give most of the assets to the wife and the liability to the husband is, surprisingly, being supported by the Law minister Salman Khurshid for reasons best known to him. In a hyper-materialistic country with property prices shooting through the roof, this law will cause severe social and marital destruction in all forms.