Re: Draft Infrastructure Model

From:john.podesta@gmail.com To: doug@presidentclinton.com CC: cheryl.mills@gmail.com, Justin@presidentclinton.com Date: 2011-12-15 15:21 Subject: Re: Draft Infrastructure Model

I'm good with this. On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Doug Band <doug@presidentclinton.com> wrote: > Are we doing this at 4? I have a 5pm mtg that can't be moved > Terry should also join > > From: Cheryl Mills [mailto:cheryl.mills@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 01:18 PM > To: Doug Band > Cc: john.podesta@gmail.com <john.podesta@gmail.com>; Justin Cooper > Subject: Re: Draft Infrastructure Model > > I can do 4-5pm. > > cdm > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Doug Band <doug@presidentclinton.com> > wrote: >> >> Agreed >> >> A call friday afternoon? >> I can do anytime from 230 to 530 >> >> ----- >> From: John Podesta [mailto:john.podesta@gmail.com] >> Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 08:34 AM >> To: Doug Band >> Cc: cheryl.mills@gmail.com <cheryl.mills@gmail.com>; Justin Cooper >> Subject: Re: Draft Infrastructure Model >> >> See you on return. We should try to button this up when you two are back. >> >> On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Doug Band <doug@presidentclinton.com> >> wrote: >> > Justin and I are both going to the me >> > >> > >> > >> > ----- >> > From: John Podesta [mailto:john.podesta@gmail.com] >> > Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2011 04:12 PM >> > To: Cheryl Mills <cheryl.mills@gmail.com> >> > Cc: Doug Band; Justin Cooper >> > Subject: Re: Draft Infrastructure Model >> > >> > Doug, >> > Are you going to the middle east? If not, want to do this in DC first >> > of the week? Cheryl, you back? >> > John >> > >> > On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Cheryl Mills <cheryl.mills@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> Revised/Updated Memo attached. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Doug Band <doug@presidentclinton.com> >> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Let's do a call and discuss this >> >>> Document is mostly fine with a few >> >>> >> >>> Late last night, laura graham called me as she couldn't reach my >> >>> brother >> >>> or her shrink. She was on staten island in her car parked a few feet >> >>> from >> >>> the waters edge with her foot on the gas pedal and the car in park. >> >>> She >> >>> called me to tell me the stress of all of this office crap with wjc >> >>> and cvc >> >>> as well as that of her family had driven her to the edge and she >> >>> couldn't >> >>> take it anymore. I spent a while on the phone with her preventing her >> >>> from >> >>> doing that, as I have a few times in the past few months, and was able >> >>> to >> >>> reach roger and her shrink. >> >>> >> >>> Bruce said the stress of specifically the office had caused his very >> >>> serious health issues as you both know. >> >>> >> >>> But I'm sure chelsea is more concerned with a mostly false story in >> >>> the >> >>> distinguished ny post about mf global and teneo not her role in what >> >>> happened to laura/bruce, what she is doing to the organization or the >> >>> several of stories that have appeared in the ny post about her father >> >>> and a >> >>> multitude of women over the years. >> >>> >> >>> For teneo, well before mf global, we have been discussing this. Its >> >>> going >> >>> to hurt teneo to have wjc on the adv bd any longer but we need come up >> >>> with >> >>> a reorg concept for the relationship with wjc and teneo that is lower >> >>> key >> >>> and handled privately and properly that we should discuss >> >>> >> >>> Life is to short so let's have a call and get this over with >> >>> >> >>> From: Cheryl Mills [mailto:cheryl.mills@gmail.com] >> >>> Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 04:38 PM >> >>> To: Doug Band; Justin Cooper >> >>> Cc: john.podesta@gmail.com <john.podesta@gmail.com> >> >>> Subject: Draft Infrastructure Model >> >>> >> >>> Doug/Justin (and John): >> >>> >> >>> Not sure where things stand in terms of folks feelings and willingness >> >>> to >> >>> engage with WJC -- attached is a revised model memo based upon >> >>> offering one >> >>> option and outlining the creation of a personal office paid for by WJC >> >>> 100% >> >>> which acts as the interlocutor for his time regarding engagement with >> >>> the >> >>> various entities and serve as advisors to him regarding what and how >> >>> he does >> >>> things. Each separate entity then would operate independently and >> >>> would >> >>> engage the leadership of the personal office - a designated CEO or COS >> >>> who >> >>> b/cs in effect what Doug and Justin have been de facto -- the arbiter >> >>> and >> >>> decision-maker. That person would have the benefit (if you two >> >>> choose) of >> >>> Doug and Justin's best advice as consultants but ultimately would be >> >>> accountable for ensuring that the implementation of the President's >> >>> will >> >>> occurs in the various entities and the various entities would operate >> >>> according to the time and engagement and direction as necessary as the >> >>> President gives. >> >>> >> >>> See what you think. >> >>> >> >>> This model would mean that all non-Foundation entities would no longer >> >>> be >> >>> co-located with Foundation; that folks would be on a single payroll - >> >>> Foundation or personal. Whatever rules the Foundation creates for >> >>> folks >> >>> being able to earn outside income would apply equally (so e.g., if >> >>> Bari is >> >>> on the Foundation payroll and Dorvir; and Ami is on Teno and the >> >>> Foundation >> >>> -- whatever rules there are for outside income would apply equally to >> >>> both >> >>> of them as Foundation employees -- namely, if rule becomes no outside >> >>> income, then both have to stop doing anything except Foundation to >> >>> stay on >> >>> Foundation payroll; if rule is you can earn outside income as long as >> >>> it is >> >>> disclosed and approved by the Board, that becomes the applicable rule; >> >>> etc. >> >>> - you get the pix). >> >>> >> >>> It's easiest for me if folks sent actual edits or comments in writing >> >>> that >> >>> can be implemented -- otherwise this exercise b/cs one of feeling in >> >>> the >> >>> dark for me. >> >>> >> >>> I am happy to do a call on Thursday or Friday if that works too. >> >>> >> >>> best. >> >>> >> >>> cdm >> >> >> >> > >