Dog

Cat

Dog

Malays are immigrants

Parameswara is an Indian

Cat

Dog

I did not even know from the temple where they studied history. They simply can not distinguish between a Religion and a Nation, how their "study" can be a scientific matter?

Cat

Dog

This is their attempt to eradicate Malay history and civilization. But, do not forget. DNA is never deceiving

Gangster

Cat

Dog

SHUT UP!

Malaya, which is located in Malay Archipelago.

The Malay Archipelago: A Travel Narrative The Malay Archipelago: A Travel Narrative - Kindle edition by Alfred Russel Wallace. Download it once and read it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Use features like bookmarks, note taking and highlighting while reading The Malay Archipelago: A Travel Narrative.

Malay is An Immigrant? Parameswara is An Indian? Come On, Get the Facts Right!

It is very funny when some say that there is no term relating to "Ketuanan Melayu" or falsely translated into Malay Supremacy . What is funny is that the party says the founder of the Malay kingdom is an Indian-born king, named, Parameswara.

Parameswara is a Malay ( Nation/Race ) King/Ruler who professes Hinduism ( Religion ).

Parameswara (king) - Wikipedia Parameswara (1344 - c. 1414), thought to be the same person named in the Malay Annals as Iskandar Shah, was the last king of Singapura and the founder of Malacca. According to the Malay Annals, he ruled Singapura from 1389 to 1398.

Otherwise, even if it is true that Parameswara is an Indian-born king, evidence, historical artifacts and radiocarbon dating suggest that Malay civilization is earlier than the existence of Parameswara itself.

EARLY HISTORY OF MALAYSIA The earliest evidence of human life in the region is a 40,000-year-old skull found in Sarawak's Niah Caves. But it was only around 10,000 years ago that the aboriginal Malays, the Orang Asli, began moving down the peninsula from a probable starting point in southwestern China.

Malay is An Immigrant? Come On, Get the Facts Right! You Must Know How To Distinguish Between A Religion and A Nation.

Readers need to be literate in understanding the difference between a RELIGION and a NATION . Religion is a belief in something spiritual(s) such as Islam, Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism and others. Whereas, the nation refers to the characteristics of the inherent characteristics of heredity, clan and ethnicity such as Malay, Chinese, Indian and others. Under this main nation there is a sub-ethnic.

The question of who is Malay and where it originates is often a debate. Some believe that the Malays themselves do not exist . Malays are said to be born from mixed marriages between "locals" with Chinese, Indian, Arab and Siam merchants who have stopped in the Malay Peninsula to trade during the reign of hundreds of empires in Malaya. The speculation of who is "the locals" is often a matter of debate between academicians, historians, politicians and the exception of keyboard warriors on social sites.

Malays are not actually a nation that exists only in Malaysia but the Malays have existed in the Malay Archipelago. The archipelago, located between the Indian Ocean and the Pacific Ocean, extends to 4,000 miles from east to west and 1,300 miles from north to south and is the largest archipelago in the world.

Malay Archipelago - Wikipedia The Malay Archipelago ( Indonesian & Malaysian: Kepulauan Melayu/Nusantara, Tagalog: Kapuluang Malay, Visayan: Kapupud-ang Malay) is the archipelago between mainland Indochina and Australia. It has also been called the Malay World, Indo-Australian Archipelago, East Indies, Nusantara, Spices Archipelago, and other names over time.

The Malay Archipelago is formed by thousands of small islands and large islands such as Borneo, Sumatra, Java, Sulawesi, Philippines and including Peninsular Malaysia.





Before the great flood that flooded the Sunda Shelf and its civilization about 10,000 years ago, the island group located on the Sunda Shelf is believed to be connected as a mainland that facilitates the movement and interaction of humans on it.

Sunda Shelf - Wikipedia Geologically, the Sunda Shelf is a southeast extension of the continental shelf of Southeast Asia. Major landmasses on the shelf include the Malay Peninsula, Sumatra, Borneo, Java, Madura, Bali and their surrounding smaller islands. It covers an area of approximately 1.85 million km 2.

As a result of this massive flood, some of the residents of the Sunda Shelf had to migrate and they were believed to have started new settlements in East Asia and the Pacific Islands.

The Out of Taiwan theory by Peter Bellwood states that Austronesian speakers have migrated out of Taiwan and moved to Southeast Asia about 10,000 years ago and brought with them the technology of rice cultivation.





As the Malay language is one of the branches of the Austronesian language , the Malays are also regarded as coming from Taiwan.

The belief that the Malays are from Yunnan or southern China are also believed to have arisen from understanding that the earliest inhabitants of Southeast Asia are from a group of people moving from southern China to Taiwan and further to Southeast Asia (the direction of north-south movement).

A History of Southeast Asia: Critical Crossroads (Blackwell History of the World) A History of Southeast Asia: Critical Crossroads (Blackwell History of the World) [Anthony Reid] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. A History of Southeast Asia: Critical Crossroads presents a comprehensive history of Southeast Asia from our earliest knowledge of its civilizations and religious patterns up to the present day.

The Population is Earlier. Again, Malay is An Immigrant? Come On, Get the Facts Right!

However, this long-established belief has been challenged and denied, as evidence from DNA studies shows that human movements in Asia and Southeast Asia are the opposite.

New Thoughts on the "Out of Taiwan" Theory - Archaeology Magazine A publication of the Archaeological Institute of America

The study of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) published in the Science magazine titled Mapping Human Genetic Diversity in Asia in 2009 shows that Southeast Asia is the earliest location of humanity from Africa to Asia.

In this study, 50 percent of the haplotype found (the SNPs group on one chromosome that was inherited together called haplotype) in the East Asian population was found only in the Southeast Asian population. This suggests that Southeast Asia is a major source of population genetic reserves in East Asia such as China and Taiwan. This evidence further promotes that the human movement in Asia is from the south to the north.

The phylogenetic analysis using the SNPs marker has placed the Semang and the Malays at earlier branches than the East Asian population , directly indicating that Orang Asli Semang and Malays are a more "early" population than the populations in China and Taiwan.

In addition to evidence from studies using SNPs, the full sequencing of mitochondrial DNA has also proven that Orang Asli in Peninsular Malaysia (Semang) is derived from the earliest modern human group that moves out of the African continent.





This movement took place roughly 60,000 - 75,000 years ago by road along the coast through India to Southeast Asia and onward to Australasia (Title of publication: Single, rapid coastal settlement of Asia revealed by analysis of complete mitochondrial genome; Science 2005).

Single, Rapid Coastal Settlement of Asia Revealed by Analysis of Complete Mitochondrial Genomes A recent dispersal of modern humans out of Africa is now widely accepted, but the routes taken across Eurasia are still disputed. We show that mitochondrial DNA variation in isolated "relict" populations in southeast Asia supports the view that there was only a single dispersal from Africa, most likely via a southern coastal route, through India and onward into southeast Asia and Australasia.

At this time, it is likely that the route to the north is blocked by extreme weather, the hilly terrain and the wilderness. The more rugged coastal route and less extreme weather may be among the factors why a group of people moving south has managed to arrive in Southeast Asia.

Similar studies conducted on 10 Malay sub-ethnic groups (Kelantan, Bugis, Banjar, Java, Acheh, Minang, Mendeleng, Swamp, Champa and Pattani) use mitochondrial DNA showing that some Malays also have mitochondrial DNA nearly 60,000 years old (Nur Haslindawaty Abd Rashid, PhD thesis, 2013) and also share the same haplogroup (mitochondrial DNA group) with the Orang Asli.

These findings prove that the Malays also belonged to a group of people moving out of Africa about 60,000-75,000 years ago who became the earliest occupants of the Malay Archipelago . Studies using different types of DNA markers have proven that all sub-ethnic Malays have very high genetic equations (Edinur et al, 2009; NurWaliyuddin et al., 2014).

Ancient Genetic Signatures of Orang Asli Revealed by Killer Immunoglobulin-Like Receptor Gene Polymorphisms The aboriginal populations of Peninsular Malaysia, also known as Orang Asli (OA), comprise three major groups; Semang, Senoi and Proto-Malays. Here, we analyzed for the first time KIR gene polymorphisms for 167 OA individuals, including those from four smallest OA subgroups (Che Wong, Orang Kanaq, Lanoh and Kensiu) using polymerase chain reaction-sequence specific primer (PCR-SSP) analyses.

This discovery has further reinforced the beliefs about the origins and connections between the early population of the Malay Archipelago . All these sub-ethnic Malays are from the same lines and share the same offspring . However, today, they have been separated by geographical and political boundaries and their outcomes are seen as different populations.

This separation however can not deny their genetically proven relationship , just like the fact of their existence in the Malay Archipelago since 60,000 years ago . Perhaps for some, knowledge about history and the origin of a nation is not important. Why do we have to bother to understand what happened thousands of years ago?

Are the journeys and experiences of our ancestors still rely on to learn? It should be remembered, our views on history actually shape our view of the future. Failure to live history means we fail to appreciate and respect the hard work of our ancestors, whereas the result is that we enjoy today.

: Welcome to #MalaysiaBaru.: What's new with Malaysia?: Nothing new, bro. Same old, same old world. What's sad is that they say thatand: Really, bro? They learn history from where?: Oh schnitzel! Really? How can this happen?....: THERE IS NO ‘KETUANAN MELAYU’ BECAUSE THE LINEAGE OF MELAKA SULTANS ARE INDIANS, NOT MALAYS!andWe do not care what you learn. Because now you live in