Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)

Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)

Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Disgraced movie mogul Harvey Weinstein must face sexual assault, battery and false imprisonment claims by a former Netflix producer who says the filmmaker subjected her to years of abuse across three continents.

Manhattan federal Judge Paul Engelmayer on Monday declined Weinstein’s motion to dismiss allegations brought by “Marco Polo” producer Alexandra Canosa in a May 2018 civil lawsuit.

He found that Canosa “plausibly alleged” Weinstein forced her into commercial sex acts and assaulted and harassed her numerous times during “ostensible business meetings” between 2010 and 2014.

Canosa accused Weinstein of sexually assaulting her at the Toronto Film Festival in September 2010, raping her while they were working on “Marco Polo” in May 2014 in Malaysia, and physically assaulting her at the Four Seasons Hotel in Hungary in June 2015.

The Weinstein Company, the fallen filmmaker’s shuttered powerhouse, attempted to dodge human sex trafficking allegations by arguing that Canosa’s predicament was nothing like a 15-year-old whose abuser gave her crack cocaine.

Engelmayer called attempts by Weinstein and his now-shuttered production company “to cabin the Trafficking Victims Protection Act to reach only caricatures of child slavery, and to exclude corporate-supported conduct … wholly un-persuasive.”

“That The Weinstein Companies, as alleged, enticed Canosa to meet with Weinstein through the promise of production deals rather than the promise of crack, does not remove their conduct from the ambit of the statute,” the judge wrote.

“Nor does the fact that as alleged the companies enabled Weinstein to force sexual acts on Canosa [in] expensive hotels rather than brothels,” he added.

The judge allowed the director’s brother, Robert Weinstein, as well as directors of their company’s board out of the suit because Canosa’s claims that they fueled Harvey’s behavior weren’t made with “adequate specificity.”

But he kept the defunct Weinstein Company in the case, writing that the firm “enabled and concealed Weinstein’s predations as a means of keeping him happy, productive and employable.”

Canosa’s lawyer, Thomas Giuffra, said, “We are very pleased with the Court’s decision, particularly its recognition of the potential culpability of the Weinstein Company in enabling Mr. Weinstein’s abuse of women.”

“It is important that the corporate culture that empowered and turned a blind eye to this conduct be held accountable in a court as well as the abuser,” Giuffra added. The Weinstein’s Company’s attorney declined to comment. Harvey Weinstein’s lawyer, Elior Shiloh, said, “Mr. Weinstein is prepared to defend against the remaining frivolous claims filed by Alexandra Canosa.”

“The documents and communications in Mr. Weinstein’s possession tell a very different tale than that alleged in Ms. Canosa’s lawsuit.”