Posted on May 13th, 2016 by Marc Stevens

Congrats to Chrisitne for standing up to the predators in Wales, and thanks for sending me the proof. This is our first dismissal in Wales, at least as far as I know.

This was a traffic ticket and Chrisitne filed the application to dismiss he got from me. The application is based on a lack of evidence proving the laws applied just because he is physically in Wales, no jurisdiction and no valid cause of action.

A. Slight, the prosecutor, withdrew his complaint on grounds:

“there is not enough evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction.”

Given the application is based on a lack of evidence, it’s easy to see why Slight declined to prosecute. There is no guess work here, though critics will speculate it had nothing to do with the application.

And critics will further dismiss this saying “it’s just a traffic ticket.” A traffic ticket is based on the same claim as more serious charges, that your physical location makes their rules (“laws”) magically apply to us.

It’s no easier to prove the laws apply in a traffic case as it is in a tax or drug case. It’s impossible to do, that is why A. Slight, like so many others, declined to prosecute.

If you think there is evidence proving the laws apply to Chrisitne, evidence the crown prosecutor could not provide, then please call into a live broadcast and present it.