P.R. Srinivasan 669 days ago

The temple at sabarimala is of buddhist origin and the traditions and beliefs is the aftermath thought of the tantri family which took over the control from the earlier family. This may be less than 50 years old and it has no originality. The lady called malakipourathu amma is the companion of ayyappa and she is of menstruating age. If ayyappa can allow malikapurathu amma to be allowed to be worshipped in the sabarimala temple adjacent to his own (it is not swayambu) why other menstruating women cannot be allowed. One of the opponents Rahul is a namboodiri and he married a nair girl without following customs, traditions, beliefs and acharayams and such people ought to be banned because it is this kind of people who are instigators for the preent turmoil. The temple must be locked and kept closed till these troubnle makers are taught a lesson. The word saranam is associated with Buddhism and not Hinduism hence there is no such custom or tradition associated with buddhist temple. People who come here as devotees also visit first vavar who was the muslim commander of ayyappans army. If ayyappa trusted vavar and his devotees are allowed to worship vavar then why hindu women cannot be allowed to worship both vavar and ayyappa .. it is vinasa kala vipireetha buddhi. SC will definitely uphold its verdict because temples are subjected to Indian constitution where customs, traditions, beliefs etc have no place at all.It is foolish people who talk nonsense in the name of ayyappa