01:09:221 (1,2,3,4) - 01:14:801 (2) - 01:17:681 (2,3,4) - 01:20:501 (1) - 01:22:901 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1) - 01:37:841 (2,3,4) - 01:40:661 (1,1) - 01:43:061 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - 03:39:821 (6,7,8,9,10,11,1) - 04:05:921 (2,3,4) - 04:40:901 (1) - 05:47:061 (5) - 05:54:661 (4,5) - You will want to reconsider your rhythm choices this part. These are the ones that had a weak, or nearly no distinct beat in the song yet got mapped (which I consider overmaps). I see you were expressing some weak beats are an extremely close spaced streams. The thing is, some of those were really weak beats and mapping that way was pretty fine, but the ones I've highlighted here are ones with nearly no beat. Some 1/4 reverse sliders are also in the list, because some 1/4 sliders were having a strong & real beat while the ones I've highlighted here are ones with nearly no beat to get expressed. Mapping the same way didn't felt really great here.

02:20:021 - Personally, a change of pitch wasn't as notable as 02:19:541 which kinda felt apart froom the song. Imo, just using a long slider that starts from 02:19:541 would reflect the song better.

02:35:381 - The sudden switch from 1/3 to 1/4 along a similar looking stream shape doesn't really seem to be properly indicating the rhythm of the pattern.

02:51:701 - The claps at the slider end in this section... I can understand that it fits with the song, but in the viewpoint of hitsounds, since the tail's sound was much stronger than the head, while the prominent rhythm the clicking beats are following something other than drum beats, it really felt weird for me. Mind using some alternative hitsound file, or something?

03:48:101 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - I wasn't pretty sure if this is accurate to be 1/4.

04:58:421 (4,1,2,3,4,5) - I'm pretty curious what happened to the patterning and the comboing. It kinda felt broken with the 3 combo cycle.

05:04:181 (1) - The slider concept I'm seeing here is mostly parallels. I'm pretty sure avoiding this overlap would work much better for consistency.

05:11:861 (1) - Parallel at the last part could be better.



I do approve the aesthetic concepts and the structure idea overall, but the map quite feels too excessive for me.

Popping over questionable rhythm choices.