Download raw source

Delivered-To: john.podesta@gmail.com Received: by 10.25.43.68 with SMTP id r65csp134945lfr; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 12:16:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.90.169 with SMTP id bx9mr14131526wjb.1.1445454964808; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 12:16:04 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <nbudzinski@hillaryclinton.com> Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com (mail-wi0-x22d.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hj12si12174002wib.32.2015.10.21.12.16.04 for <john.podesta@gmail.com> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Oct 2015 12:16:04 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nbudzinski@hillaryclinton.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of nbudzinski@hillaryclinton.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=nbudzinski@hillaryclinton.com; dkim=pass header.i=@hillaryclinton.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=hillaryclinton.com Received: by mail-wi0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id fv8so74544244wic.0 for <john.podesta@gmail.com>; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 12:16:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hillaryclinton.com; s=google; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=8MqlihjxHb2FV73iriLlPNfD4xNiaPdJLm80e/SSqe4=; b=dnYH0cVO/UGEaScVB3t+cryXsuSg6EOLNlCLppM1twyPF2hKcluJWyfo5BkWZmdzdP L6nGqTPxGDE3Y2/dBcb2gZdLYjWza0l7pWcdZ7gTg2X2xeGXL5ueGJua3SRDktZ7DyYL jOQZFt3V4jJ/h3gt3rTjIMyAYUUoJkxSyZ3Q0= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=8MqlihjxHb2FV73iriLlPNfD4xNiaPdJLm80e/SSqe4=; b=fwABK1KYSXOcg0+iVhuJGlXD6U8kD0UwZnrYNCd8mGU4S/eb2OmypAz0VH7w1soVQs VrK/DF7fHP7+wIimWJacQc1ZveDHFnUqWAedGeHO7lMemRk6SukrUIK7AUpPDexFIVgP h2xGHpY+304RIYP0otPI11CFzeG2W0MVsqvrtJFoNO+1llvv/pEU6/NVLNtdQINIU8lm UJCKMUZxG707ywA9LbkFjhnnGBB+HTQkjl7hpvqozSRpViPrkZtdKPo/VvJN27Evugd5 sOk2vZ857hD2ti7kIAyJszWm9/eZkOqPMbVccfaEz6Ojxu4bFO9YLKp6WHZ7YZduYRmQ CFcA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQknMJtM1kT1cmjufIgEn+Ayh/sCrEzS2Z/Z0ljvov3F7sKw35SW0wxR5J2GeindHt0OlAli X-Received: by 10.180.11.212 with SMTP id s20mr12656086wib.40.1445454964434; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 12:16:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.27.7.77 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 12:15:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Nikki Budzinski <nbudzinski@hillaryclinton.com> Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 15:15:44 -0400 Message-ID: <CA+Z3wa0ZYJT5oc4PR4rrQVRCznR99vV7azNVuy1KqUT2EwF2Sg@mail.gmail.com> Subject: AFL-CIO Math To: Robby Mook <re47@hillaryclinton.com>, Marlon Marshall <mmarshall@hillaryclinton.com>, John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com>, Amanda Renteria <arenteria@hillaryclinton.com>, Huma Abedin <ha16@hillaryclinton.com>, Sara Latham <slatham@hillaryclinton.com>, Heather Stone <hstone@hillaryclinton.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c243f0b1be290522a2350b --001a11c243f0b1be290522a2350b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi guys I wanted to provide you with a updated outlook on where we stand with the AFL-CIO endorsement process. Technically the vote requires unions that represent 2/3 of the 12.5 million member organization to support endorsement. My recommendation is that once we cross 50% we have a delegation of Presidents come to Trumka and ask him to call the vote for HRC. I have outline below where we currently stand with AFL-CIO affiliated unions, these numbers include two union endorsements (AFSCME and IUOE) that I fully expect to happen by October 28th, 2015. I have included recommendations on what is needed to cross the threshold, I believe it lies with the UFCW. AFT 1.6 million AFSCME 1.6 million (10/23) IAM 720,000 IUOE 400,000 (10/28) UA 340,000 IUPAT 160,000 BAC 50,000 Roofers 30,000 OPCMIA 20,000 *HRC Total: 4.9 million* *Goal: 6.0 million* Outstanding Unions in AFL-CIO: Smaller building trades unions outstanding that I think we can get Insulators, Elevator, SMART and Ironworkers=total 389K (I am working these with Monroe) UFCW 1.3 million AFGE 670,000 UAW 390,000 We could hit the goal with the remaining building trades + AFGE (but AFGE won't go until mid December). The quicker and more expedited path is thru the UFCW. Focusing in on the UFCW endorsement, needed next steps: 1. Brooklyn HQ Policy Discussion (I need to set up dates to offer Stuart next week that work for Robby and Maya Harris)-The UFCW will be bringing in their Executive Vice Presidents and key International Vice Presidents for a policy conversation around their industries. 2. It is likely I will need some HRC time with either Marc and/or his Executive Board before the vote. Standard 60 minutes, like other Executive Board convenings. I'd like to push (with Stuart) the UFCW to move in November. After this endorsement, we set a AFL-CIO endorsement goal immediately to follow pre-Iowa in December/January. What do you think? -- Nikki Budzinski Labor Outreach Director Hillary for America 646-854-1442 (direct) --001a11c243f0b1be290522a2350b Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr">Hi guys<div><br><div>I wanted to provide you with a update= d outlook on where we stand with the AFL-CIO endorsement process.=C2=A0 Tec= hnically the vote requires unions that represent 2/3 of the 12.5 million me= mber organization to support endorsement.=C2=A0 My recommendation is that o= nce we cross 50% we have a delegation of Presidents come to Trumka and ask = him to call the vote for HRC.=C2=A0 I have outline below where we currently= stand with AFL-CIO affiliated unions, these numbers include two union endo= rsements (AFSCME and IUOE) that I fully expect to happen by October 28th, 2= 015.=C2=A0 I have included recommendations on what is needed to cross the t= hreshold, I believe it lies with the UFCW.</div><div><br></div><div>AFT =C2= =A01.6 million</div><div>AFSCME 1.6 million (10/23)</div><div>IAM =C2=A0720= ,000</div><div>IUOE =C2=A0400,000 (10/28)</div><div>UA =C2=A0340,000=C2=A0<= /div><div>IUPAT =C2=A0160,000</div><div>BAC =C2=A050,000</div><div>Roofers = =C2=A030,000</div><div>OPCMIA =C2=A020,000<br></div><div><br></div><div><b>= HRC Total: =C2=A04.9 million</b></div><div><u>Goal: =C2=A06.0 million</u></= div><div><br></div><div>Outstanding Unions in AFL-CIO:</div><div>Smaller bu= ilding trades unions outstanding that I think we can get Insulators, Elevat= or, SMART and Ironworkers=3Dtotal 389K (I am working these with Monroe)</di= v><div>UFCW =C2=A01.3 million</div><div>AFGE =C2=A0670,000</div><div>UAW = =C2=A0390,000=C2=A0</div><div><br></div><div>We could hit the goal with the= remaining building trades + AFGE (but AFGE won't go until mid December= ).=C2=A0 The quicker and more expedited path is thru the UFCW.</div><div><b= r></div><div>Focusing in on the UFCW endorsement, needed next steps:</div><= div><br></div><div>1.=C2=A0 Brooklyn HQ Policy Discussion (I need to set up= dates to offer Stuart next week that work for Robby and Maya Harris)-The U= FCW will be bringing in their Executive Vice Presidents and key Internation= al Vice Presidents for a policy conversation around their industries.</div>= <div><br></div><div>2.=C2=A0 It is likely I will need some HRC time with ei= ther Marc and/or his Executive Board before the vote.=C2=A0 Standard 60 min= utes, like other Executive Board convenings.</div><div><br></div><div>I'= ;d like to push (with Stuart) the UFCW to move in November.=C2=A0 After thi= s endorsement, we set a AFL-CIO endorsement goal immediately to follow pre-= Iowa in December/January.</div><div><br></div><div>What do you think?</div>= <div><div><br></div>-- <br><div class=3D"gmail_signature"><div dir=3D"ltr">= <div><div dir=3D"ltr"><div>Nikki Budzinski</div><div>Labor Outreach Directo= r</div><div>Hillary for America</div><div>646-854-1442 (direct)</div></div>= </div></div></div> </div></div></div> --001a11c243f0b1be290522a2350b--