$150 Billion in Foundation Funds Attacking Trump and Pushing Third World Immigration; Soros, Ford, Carnegie, Gates, Rockefeller, Etc.

Obama-Clinton friend George Soros and the other major foundation chiefs purposely use their network of pro-immigration, black activism and feminist groups to attack Trump's policies day in day out. It's amazing to see how much hatred and division $150 billion in foundation funds can steer up under the pretense of trying to do the opposite.

Contents

"While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavor to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their [colonialist] exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life... With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites..."

~ 1957 hoax during the early Rockefeller-funded Civil Rights movement. Nevertheless a hoax that appears to be awfully accurate and prophetic.

LISTS OF SOROS, FORD, ROCKEFELLER, ETC.-FUNDED ACTIVIST NGOS



Obama-related: Woods Fund; Gamaliel, Joyce and Annenberg foundations

The Woods Fund is a pro-Third World immigration and black activism-related foundation that does the bidding of much larger liberal establishment foundations as Rockefeller, Open Society, Ford, Carnegie, etc., all listed on the main "liberal CIA" page. Obama's elite Joyce Foundation is also detailed there.

Anti-Trump-specific activism

* '17 TMBCO: Trump Muslim Ban Counter-Offensive (Bill Gates Foundation-tied). Also, there will be many more, but there's no time to investigate them all.

General immigration groups

Black activist groups

Latino immigration groups

Arab/Muslim immigration groups

Pro-Palestine, pro-Iran / anti-Israel activism

Music / TV / Movies

EU-based immigration and "anti-racism" groups

Largely focused on the Netherlands for now. Some of the groups mentioned here cannot be linked as tightly to "liberal CIA" foundations, but are important to list here in light of future articles. They still are very "multiculture" propagandist with ties to Soros, EU and/or national government-funded groups.

"A government report said today that whites and ethnic minorities in Britain had become deeply divided and that they were leading separate lives with no social or cultural contact and no sense of belonging to the same nation."

December 12, 2001, New York Times, 'British Life Is Fractured Along Racial Lines, a Study Finds'. Old news, but elites don't want to listen. It's the same all over Europe and everywhere else.



Keep in mind Far Eastern and Latin American immigration, which you primarily see in the U.S., while not perfect (especially the latter), is far less problematic than Africans and Arabs.

"Separating people can be an act of love. Bringing people together can be an act of hate."

~ Possibly this author.

New article, old ground

This oversight and introduction is an offshoot of ISGP's article The Grassroots Myth: "Liberal CIA" Network of New Left Foundations, Media and Activist Groups - Much More Than Just Soros. Considering the unusually heated nature of the Third World immigration and black activism subject, I thought it best to put it all on a separate page.

Witnessing the death of white America and conservatism

I didn't exactly intend to write about it, but seeing all the highly aggressive and irrational protest groups arise against president Donald Trump, apart from the extreme bias in the dominant liberal media against him and literally every last supporter of his, made this additional oversight necessary.

Based on the picture sketched by the mainstream media (certainly over here in Europe), you'd think Trump got elected without anyone really voting for him, certainly not with any enthusiasm. However, the fact is that a whopping 58% of the native white population (only 61% of the U.S. in late 2016) voted for him. If Trump wouldn't have been caught with his "grab 'em by the pussy" incident and would have been able to keep abortion on the agenda without too much upsetting the conservative right, he would possibly have gone over 60% support. The only white group that strongly went against him were young, college-educated and seemingly highly politically-activated women.

These facts sure disappeared from the news quickly, didn't they? You heard a ton of complaining about the "popular vote" and how "totally unexpected" the Trump election was (not with the right poll), but these facts were not really seen as important enough to properly analyze. The more isolated people felt in their support for Trump, the better.

The media clearly not looking deeper than Obama's 2009 inauguration, in part because Trump went along and also did not look deeper.

Similarly the view was pushed that almost nobody bothered to show up at the Trump inauguration in January 2017 (estimated at 800,000 on average) by only comparing it to Obama's 1.8 million of January 2009. What the media - and bizarrely even Trump with statements as, "It looked honestly like a million and a half people." [1] - failed to explain is that the Trump inauguration in numbers was on par with Bill Clinton's first inauguration in 1993 and more than twice as large as George W. Bush's first inauguration in 2001.

As most people will probably remember, the first Obama administration was one giant hype train: he was the first black president in U.S. history and with that was presented as the savior of the United States and the rest of the world, certainly after 8 years of Bush administration controversy, including questions about 9/11, unilateral actions, and an endless War on Terror. By 2013 Obama's inauguration numbers had fallen with 44% to 1 million, while earlier Bush's second inauguration number at 400,000 represented an increase of 33%. [2]

These are the real facts. And thus we once again have to conclude that the dominant liberal mainstream media is hiding, underrepresenting and distorting facts. In this article and oversight we're dealing with supposedly "independent" and "grassroots" activist groups which supposedly have no connection whatsoever with the ruling liberal establishment, including the mainstream media. Except... they have.

The information presented on this page should quickly make it clear that most of the key "liberal CIA" foundations as Rockefeller, Open Society (Soros), Ford, Carnegie, Packard, MacArthur and Gates that I discussed in early 2016 as having poured vast amounts of money into "new left" media outlets, sustainable development and anti-corporate activists groups, also help keep afloat the U.S.' entire pro-Third World immigration and black activism network. As a result, and in coordination with Democrat Party elites in particular, they have been able to activate these Third World immigrants and the black population against Donald Trump and his supporters.

Someone is clearly building a North American Union, although the question is how much it will be a union among the masses. By mid-century white Americans will become a minority in their own country, while many major European cities will be near 100% inhabited by a hodgepodge of Arab, African and East-European nationalities.

It's not a given, at all, by the way, that the Mid-West and such votes Republican, as the 2000 and certainly 1996 map demonstrates - which might be evidence that U.S. citizens are willing to reject the benefits of liberalism in a desperate attempt to stop Third World immigration.

The result can be seen in the map above. Black-dominated districts all vote Democrat, but as soon as the percentage drops below 50%, the white population - which, as in Europe, will be more "reactionary" due to what they see around them - still manage to swing their districts towards the Republicans. The giant influx of Latinos since the 1990s, however, is creating more and more minority-dominated districts in the south-western United States, rendering all voting activity of the native white population obsolete and swinging these districts to Democrat. All natives can do from that point on is retreat north or accept that they now are a minority in their own state.

Old white people retiring to Florida might well have saved this state from turning fully Democrat.

It must be said, the tendency of Latinos to vote Democrat is less than that of the systematically poorer blacks, but once a district rises to about 55-60% foreign, which is getting increasingly common in the south-west, any political struggle is generally over. Clearly California (which until 1988 often voted Republican) and New Mexico are states that have been conquered from Republicans in this manner. Arizona is about to be next. Certainly looking at the fact that the white population in the United States is decreasing with a staggering 0.42% per year, it should be clear that this scenario is only a matter of time.

States swinging from R. to D. Original 2016 result Change Florida (29) and Arizona (11) R. 306 vs D. 232 R. 266 vs D. 272 Texas (38) R. 306 vs D. 232 R. 268 vs D. 270

From this perspective it is very easy to see why liberal globalist elites, in the 2008-2016 period working through the Democrat Party under top "liberal CIA" asset Barack Obama (Rockefeller Republicans traditionally were the other liberal establishment option), have been so obsessed with bringing Third World inhabitants into the United States. Bring enough of them into Arizona and Florida and it's going to be next to impossible for conservatives and their Republican Party to ever win an election again. Bring in even more, especially into Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, Texas and Utah and by 2050 white people in the United States, and their cultural heritage, are basically lost.

An exaggeration? Hardly, Georgia's white population alone dropped from 72% in 1980 to 55% by 2013, with the Latino share increasing 9-fold. [3] By the time most readers run into this article, Georgia's white population will have fallen below 50%. As in Europe, this change (read: deterioration) is causing great friction among whites, who are starting to flee the Latino and "Asian" (read: Muslim) immigrant hordes. One example is the Georgian town of Norcross that went from 95% white to just 20% in a generation. Employers here now often require whites to be bilingual in their own state, simply because so many foreigners banding together have no desire to learn English, or adapt in general. [4]

If everything goes as planned by the liberal superclass, and the country doesn't break down into full-scale sectarian warfare, the North America Union might be a reality by 2100. All we can do is pray for the most peaceful and prosperous outcome in which the West remains the dominant, stabilizing power in the world.

Pray for Europe as well, because with all the Arabs and African blacks dominating the inner cities these days, complete with hugely increased crime levels and a destruction of any kind of unity, it's looking even worse.

Obama reelected with... 39% of the white vote

News biased much?

Fascinatingly, hard evidence that white people in the West - the United States at the front - are losing their country to the Third World, is posted every 4 years in the form of election exit polls per ethnicity on the website of the New York Times. The trick is to pay attention to it - which took this author about 15 years.

Unfortunately, Muslims (probably hidden under "Asian") and Jews are missing from these polls, but even with that we can see that if it had been up to the native white people, not a single Democrat president would ever have been elected . Gerald Ford would have easily beat Jimmy Carter in 1976, George H. W. Bush and Bob Dole would both have beat Bill Clinton, and John McCain and even more so Mitt Romney would have absolutely smoked Barack Obama.

Looking at these polls, Donald Trump's election is a near miracle. Among white people, he smoked Hillary Clinton even harder than Romney did Obama, but there are just too many Third World immigrants - who are too "activated" by the "liberal CIA"-funded NGOs. More and more of them are coming in every day.

Readers can also see the importance of a strong black candidate - such as the often-mentioned Rockefeller ally Oprah Winfrey - these days. Polls show that whether a candidate is white or black doesn't matter much to white voters. But it does matter a lot to black voters, who start turning up at higher numbers than usual and - looking at the 2008 Obama election - will vote for that candidate another 7 percent points more than for a white candidate. Quite possibly it ups the Latino vote as well. Would Trump stand a chance against a well-spoken Oprah? Good question.

Looking at the above and other exist polls of the last few decades in the New York Times oversight and it instantly becomes clear how elections are a game of percentages. To affect change in these percentages, all you have to do is target various subsections of the population and see how it leads to change in the various polls. If there's no change, or not enough, try a different form of propaganda. Certainly it should be immediately clear now why elites:

are riling up blacks and other minorities against the white majority;

have been driving blacks and Latinos to the voting booths through a variety of NGOs;

are financing extremist feminism and creating a divide between men and women;

are financing extremist LGBTQ activists who blame white males in particular for everything;

have been driving women to the voting booths and getting them onto the streets to protest;

have been targeting the entire school system with the above issues, including open borders propaganda;

ban anti-open borders opinions from the top layers of the education system and government departments;

are intimidating the white masses against speaking out against relentless Third World immigration through the media and politics.

If only 1 or 2% in each subsection switches votes as a result of this propaganda, that can easily mean the elites are getting the election result they desire. Arguably, the cumulative effect of long-term propaganda is much greater than this.

How liberalism, without a third party, has become the enemy

Years ago already, ISGP detailed how the Democrat vs. Republican election system is a ruse. The liberal establishment runs through both Democrat and somewhat moderate Republicans, with every administration since WWII having extremely close ties to the Rockefeller clique. It also runs the pro-Palestine "new left", which today is attacking Trump.

The alternative, the conservative establishment, these days consists of pro-Israel neocons and controlled opposition old right/alt right isolationists. They're mostly Republican, but some, with Trump advisor James Woolsey at the top, are hawkish Democrats.

It's amazing really how the liberal superclass has turned liberalism into the enemy of the West. You care about the environment? Then you vote Democrat - and thus for relentless Third World immigration. You care about a decent minimum wage? Then you vote Democrat - and thus for relentless Third World immigration. You care about weed and psychedelics legalization, abortion rights, minority rights, social security programs, medical care, decent taxation of the upper classes? Anything social? Anything progressive? Well, you are going to vote Democrat - and thus for relentless Third World immigration.

The situation in Europe is largely similar. While you often have a multi-party system with half a dozen competing parties, all of them typically represent shades of Bilderberg gray, certainly when it comes to European integration, open borders to the Third World, the environment and support for the Palestinians. Labour Party? Green Party? Socialist Party? Liberal Party? Christian Democrat Party? It makes very little, if any difference, on these issues. Any talk by these party leaders of curbing immigration is generally populist window dressing for highly ineffective measures.

Many of these European parties, by the way, have played a role in organizing overseas anti-Donald Trump rallies in the wake of his election by getting together a few hundred or a few thousand of their party members and having friends in the media point a camera on to them. A bunch of Oxfam-financed (in turn backed by the more familiar foundation names) activist groups generally delivered the remaining protesters.

In Europe there's often an openly fascist party as well - which hardly anyone votes for. Then there is a more mainstream conservative party (neocon or anti-Semite old/new right) that many (otherwise liberal) people reluctantly vote for as these parties represent the only solution to the most nagging problem of all: Third World immigration. Among the better known names in this category are Nigel Farage, Pim Fortuyn (assassinated), Geert Wilders, Jorg Haider (car accident) and Jean-Marie le Pen. They differ quite a bit, but in the end they all oppose the European Union and immigration. You just can't have one without the other.

Paris, the city of love, anno 2017. If you want structural solutions to this, who you gonna vote for? Good question. Options are extremely limited.

Note: 28% of South Africans openly admit to having raped a women, with much of Africa not far behind in numbers.

This is why ISGP has taken the stance for years at this point that a third party is needed, both in Europe and the United States: one that fully embraces modern, liberal thinking, but at the same time is strongly anti-Third World immigration. Immigration and race mixing are still seen as desirable by this (liberal) Third Party, but in a controlled manner that takes place over a number of centuries in order to prevent balkanization, tribalism and enormous frustration among the native culture - and possibly even sectarian war and genocide.

To be honest, I have never heard any ordinary person I talked to about this disagree with this line of reasoning. On the contrary, it makes all the sense in the world to most (liberal) people. So why don't we have political parties with these programs? Considering temporary political parties are descended from permanent liberal and conservative establishments, the "by design" answer might not be entirely incorrect.

Pro-immigration elite brought us today's graying populations

The (short-sighted) reason of the pro-immigration propaganda. Less than 2 means a declining population and - to a degree - would certainly mean a more influential and higher paid work force due to labor shortages and lower house prices because there's a surplus - things banks and multinationals do not like. But why not propagandize higher birth numbers? Why infest our society with the crime-ridden , religiously-indoctrinated Third World? And why even support Black Lives Matter

Really one of the most bizarre angles of the immigration crisis is that it is largely the liberal elite's fault to begin with. As discussed in a little more detail in the "liberal CIA" oversight on feminism, the introduction of birth control measures - such as legalized abortion, condoms and the pill - has been spearheaded by the Morgans, Carnegies and Rockefellers. Unfortunately, while effective in reducing population growth in the West, the Third World didn't want to listen - Africa and a number of Asian countries in particular. So today we are still left with a massively overpopulated planet and people from all over the Third World banging on our doors.

Planned Parenthood, one of two key partners behind the anti-Trump Women's March on Washington. The group also happens to be largely responsible for the West's aging problems, necessitating Third Wold immigration.

Granted, Planned Parenthood brought tons of improvements to western society. If only the elites financing it would have "planned" the birth rate drop-off a little better.

On top of that, the population growth in the West dropped off too quickly due to aggressive promotion of these birth control measures through elite-backed non-profits as Planned Parenthood, leaving us with a serious population aging problem and a society in which adequate medicare programs are hardly even feasible anymore, especially not in western Europe. Graying populations are putting an ever increasing amount of stress on the younger generation.

So, how do our elites solve this problem? Well, they open the floodgates to the Third World, that same Third World, especially in Africa and the Middle East, that never had a functioning democracy, or in case of Africa, even a civilization to speak of. In order to make it happen, elites just suppress all numbers on crime, religious extremism and genetic IQ; and run permanent psychological warfare operations against the native masses to keep them as docile as possible.

To give just one example of crime numbers, 28% of South African men openly admit to having raped at least one woman in their lives, with much of Africa having numbers not too far behind, and we're actually allowing people from these regions to enter our society? Without a debate? Really? Then to think that elites have actually managed to rally American feminists to the cause of unrestrained Third World immigration. If they want their feminist rights to survive, maybe they should do less campaigning and make more babies.

May 2017, Netherlands: "Islamophobia increases", the wrong kind of propaganda. Pro-immigration propaganda on Dutch government TV and radio closely mirrors that of the U.S. and all other western countries.

And maybe liberal elites should have started a propaganda campaign 40 years ago, when the first "guest workers" arrived in Europe from the Middle East, that this type of Third World immigration would continue to increase - including the crime numbers and cultural destruction - if the native masses do not produce more babies. At least then we, the masses, would have been provided with a reasonable alternative and we would only have ourselves to blame if things didn't work out. This situation is by far the worst in Europe.

All this begs the same eternal question: should we be ruled by undemocratic, shadowy, manipulative elites who think they know what's best for us? Or should we have a free media in which the masses actually get a voice? And in which realistic, productive debates take place, so we can work towards real solutions in which everybody knows what is going on? Wouldn't that create much more of a united and productive civilization? Quite possibly. Certainly it would rank much higher on that oh-so-beloved "social justice" scale than what we have today. Really, why rely on elites that essentially are doing little more than trying to correct their past mistakes with even bigger mistakes? Like this last one: an open borders policy complete with pitting immigrant and minority ethnic groups against native populations through the stimulation of the use of slurs as "haters" and "racists"... Nothing good can come from that.

Pro-immigration elite, supposedly "anti-racist", brought us the Holocaust

When you think deep about the liberal establishment's anti-"racism" or anti-"hate" campaign, you realize that it is these same Morgan, Carnegie and Rockefeller elites, in addition to other Anglo-American Pilgrims Society families, who pre-World War II backed the "Nordic" and eugenicist theories that helped inspire Hitler's race obsession. Madison Grant's The Passing of the Great Race, for example, quite literally was a Pilgrims Society-Morgan-Carnegie-Rockefeller publication. These facts are discussed in ISGP's Pilgrims Society article, but basically Hitler took the Anglo-Saxon concept of an ideal "Nordic" race, renamed this race "Aryan", and determined that the Jews were the least desirable race of all. What he did next is history.

Hitler with Neville Chamberlain. Supposedly Chamberlain "appeased" Hitler out of fear for another war, but history books have failed to notice that he and his family were deeply involved in Imperial Chemical Industries, General Motors and Du Pont, just three (Pilgrims-tied) corporations that helped build Nazi Germany's war machine.

Of course, these same Pilgrims Society elites thought it a wonderful idea to financially support the fascist regimes of Europe - Hitler, Mussolini and Franco - and even to sponsor a little domestic fascism in the form of the American Liberty League and a number of related groups. These facts also have been discussed at length in ISGP's Pilgrims Society article.

Now, today, of course, these same elites are intimidating the masses by promoting the use of slurs as "fascist", "hater", and "racist" to any anti-immigration politician and his or her followers, to the point that hardly anyone even dares to publicly ask one legitimate question about the whole subject.

Isn't it incredible how elites always manage to cause problems by forcing extremes onto the masses? Religion is probably the best example of that. Over the past several thousand years humans were forced to believe all kinds of different cultic religious nonsense and now that we in the West have finally been moving beyond that, we are increasingly being forced to accept the religion of no religion: absolute atheism. Or we have this equally peculiar new age network of Deepak Chopra and the like. It's all very strange.

Of course, the question in relation to this latest liberal elite-pushed utopian ideal of a fully "multicultural" western society is if it's going to result in a similar disaster that we saw after they introduced their favorite race theories in the early 20th century: over 60 million dead and a virtual annihilation of the Jewish people.

Because like it or not, the white tribe is making up an ever smaller portion of the global population and, especially in Europe, is rapidly giving its living space away to a hodgepodge of Third World societies - some openly hostile to the West - that have never able to get their own houses in order. We essentially are the only tribe that is doing that. Our open-mindedness and sense of social justice is our greatest strength, but if balance is lost because our actions come from a place of weakness where we don't dare to say "enough is enough", it can also result in our ultimate downfall.

How foundations influence, obstruct and even kill state leaders

Pim Fortuyn and Donald Trump: 14 years apart, but received the exact same mainstream media and "grassroots" activism treatment. In both instances the media also conveniently ignored the most reliable sort of poll with these candidates.

Of course, Fortuyn nor Trump was/is independent. Both have received backing from Zionist/neocon corners, particularly obvious to see with Trump when James Woolsey's group began to advise him. But did the mainstream media properly explain this? No, they haven't, which, of course, is highly curious.

The Trump phenomenon of a mainstream media in full panic and upset mode is not entirely new to the Dutch people. In 2002 Pim Fortuyn would have been elected as Holland's prime minister, were it not that he was assassinated by an environmentalist a week before the election. Throughout the entire election campaign, Fortuyn was relentlessly demonized by the media and all political parties (soon even his own, from which he was booted mid-election) while the average native, especially in the major cities with massive Third World immigration, was wildly excited about his arrival onto the political scene.

After the assassination it was widely accepted that the political and media establishment (surrounding the royal family of Orange and its Bilderberg and 1001 Club groups) played a role in Fortuyn's death. Nobody was punished, of course, and now we see with Trump that the same phenomenon has arrived. It is entirely possible that Trump is murdered tomorrow by a radical feminist, environmentalist, black activist, or disenchanted Third World immigrant because of the heated climate these billion dollar foundations, the mainstream media, and both mainstream Democrat and Republican politicians are creating. And because it is the United States, the situation is actually even more extreme than with Fortuyn. Is anyone in doubt that these liberal establishment interests are begging for someone to assassinate Trump in all but words? And if it comes that far, will anyone believe that they are not breaking out the champagne behind closed doors?

In short: foundations can kill political leaders through demonization in the public's eye. And they might even kill more directly, as the environmentalist that assassinated Pim Fortuyn received close to $200,000 for his little environmental club from a Dutch foundation closely allied with the Ford and Rockefeller foundations. His club also was a spin-off of the Dutch branch of Friends of the Earth, a club more directly financed by Ford and Rockefeller money. Subsequently you had the chair of Greenpeace Holland, another group financed by Ford, Turner and Rockefeller money, stepping down to rush to the aid of this environmentalist. Of course, none of these ties were discussed in the mainstream (or even alternative) media; only ISGP has.

What we see with Trump is not just massive amounts of international activist groups being financed and provided with media attention, but even that these foundations are actively undermining his executive orders through judicial officers that they have in their pockets. The most stunning example of this is attorney general Bob Ferguson and federal judge James Robart, both from Washington state, effectively blocking a January 27, 2017 executive order of Trump to not allow any more refugees into the country from a number of Middle Eastern countries.

Attorney general Bob Ferguson (small, mid) and Judge James Robart (small, right), both responsible for blocking Trump's executive order to ban Muslim refugees from a number of countries from entering the U.S. Both Ferguson and Robert maintained very close (financial) ties to Bill Gates, Sr., visible here (second from right) with other anti-Trump financiers: George Soros, David Rockefeller and Ted Turner.

I didn't pay much attention to the case until reading that only a few months earlier Robart had shut down a case involving Seattle police reform with the statement "black lives matter!" He was utterly irrational in his closing statement, ignoring severely higher black crime numbers to make the case that black people are persecuted minorities. So I checked his background and in no-time noticed his trusteeship and chairmanship of Whitman College, which has been repeatedly financed by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation during his tenure. And guess what? The Seattle Children's Home and the Children's Home Society of Washington, which Robart respectively served as president and trustee of, have received large sums of money from not just the Gates Foundation, but also the MacArthur Foundation and other big interests. There's also Robart's old law firm, Seattle's Lane Powell PC, which has clients as Microsoft and just about every other American multinational, many of which support pro-Third World immigration NGOs.

Then you look at Robart's partner-in-crime, attorney general Bob Ferguson, in shutting down Trump's executive order and you notice that Ferguson has a long-standing involvement in NGO networks and used to work at Preston Gates & Ellis, the law firm of "liberal CIA" kingpin Bill Gates, Sr., the same Bill Gates, Sr. who has been deeply involved in running the Gates Foundation in coordination with the Rockefeller, Ford, Packard and other foundations, all of which are involved in financing anti-Trump protest groups. To underscore the Microsoft influence one more time, Microsoft openly supported the counter-action of Ferguson and Robart against Trump's executive order, together with Amazon. This last company is owned by the billionaire Jeff Bezos, a fervent Hillary Clinton supporter who these days also owns the Washington Post.

A watered-down executive order of Trump's immigration ban once again was blocked on March 15, 2017, this time by Hawaiian federal judge Derrick Watson and Maryland federal judge Theodore Chuang. Both are educated at Harvard, the number one Eastern Establishment university, have worked for very prestigious (liberal elite-oriented) law firms, and were appointed to the federal court by Trump's arch-rival Barack Obama. Isn't it ironic here that two East Asians and one black person (Obama) are making decisions here on an issue that primarily affects white Americans? Granted, looking at crime numbers, East Asians don't benefit from Third World immigration either, but hopefully one does get the point that the blocking of this order essentially comes down to one massive conflict of interest.

Ironically, Barack Obama saw a February 2015 executive order of his trying to keep 4 million immigrants in the United States blocked by Republican federal judges from Texas and other states. One looks at these sweeping immigration executive orders and one can't help but wonder if maybe such decisions should be left to popular opinion of the native masses who have been in the country for generations. Of course, that's just a pipe dream, as the liberal establishment is desperate to pump as many Third World citizens into the West as it can.

Having so often read articles in primarily the "alternative" media about presidents abusing the executive order system to bypass congress, it has been quite revealing to see that most of these orders could easily have been blocked if the liberal establishment really would have wished they were. All they have to do is have a friendly federal judge block the executive order. Whether it sticks or not, a lot of media attention gets drawn to the case, forcing a particular policy of a president into the open. It once again makes one wonder about the immense forces any truly independent elected president would be up against. There are just so many ways to shut a presidency down: through congress, the senate, the media, NGO activism and now the system of federal judges.

Also looking at the incredibly hard time Trump has with filling his State Department and a number of other government departments with qualified personnel, we find more evidence of the influence of this $150 billion foundation network. Most senior officers in government have a degree of involvement in the private think tank world surrounding the CFR, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg and Aspen Institute - which all receive a mix of corporate and foundation funds - had scholarships paid for by these foundations, or went to a handful of key universities - mainly Harvard, Yale, Princeton - that receive massive financing from these foundations. All of this is discussed in ISGP's Pilgrims Society article. Essentially, these foundations have enslaved the whole upper-most tier of society with the money they dole out. Very few individuals in this highest level network appear to be interested in aiding the Trump government in any way, if only because they can forget about getting any position of substance at liberal elite-dominated NGOs and corporations if they do. Even if they do express to be interested, it's next to impossible for Trump to tell what the real objectives of these people are. Quite possibly they will undermine him down the line. So Trump rejecting literally everyone who has criticized his presidential campaign in the past might have been a wise move.

Although he does appear to have a will of his own (or certainly is restricted by old/alt right support base), Trump has a degree of support from the highest-level neoconservative corners, filtering down from his presidential campaign advisor James Woolsey. Now, imagine a truly independent, third party presidential candidate. Imagine it's you. Imagine you somehow manage to circumvent the mainstream and similarly-controlled alternative media, get your voice out to the masses, and manage to get elected president with such an overwhelming majority that vote tampering is out of the question. How are you gonna get past the electoral college confirmation? How are you going to have your key, totally independent cabinet officials ratified by the senate? How are you going to fill approximate 4,000 government positions while no one from previous administrations - the only persons with the necessary experience - is there to help you? How are you going to stop infiltration and internal sabotage? Simply looking at the truly stunning amount of disinformers trying to latch themselves to a tiny site as ISGP, I can only imagine what a president-elect would have to deal with. How are you going to stop the judiciary from overturning all your executive orders? As the James Robart case appears to demonstrate, foundation money can buy federal judges.

Not all of this can be pinned on the foundations, but the private funds they have at their disposal, and their cooperation with numerous multinationals, do seem to hold most of this "soft power" establishment network together. Without these funds, it becomes infinitely harder to "own" people. They shift loyalties, start doing their own thing, etc.

Trump: actually pro-Third World immigration

Fully in-line with ISGP's premise from the start that he is merely a "conservative CIA" actor, Trump has not only spread large amounts of conspiracy disinformation, but has actually quietly supported the globalist open borders program. During his election campaign, he briefly made some statements of Latin Americans being rapists. After his election, he tried to ban Muslims from the country. Despite popular demand, this executive order was obstructed by Obama- and Bill Gates Foundation-tied federal judges.

In February 2018 his "Four Pillars" program, focused on reducing uncontrolled immigration (border security and banning a diversity/immigration lottery and the dreaded chain migration, where whole families are brought in after a single member has been granted citizenship), was blocked by pro-business Republicans and leftists. Meanwhile, his attempts at building a border wall have also been thwarted to a large extent. For the most part, very quickly after his inauguration, Trump's focus largely shifted towards waging a variety of trade wars with China, Russia and Europe.

Worse, if we look at the small print, we find that Trump has done nothing at all to stop the white percentage from declining with 0.5% a year. He has not advocated higher birth numbers for whites and has quite openly continued to sign off on increased Third World immigration. For example, during his 2019 State of the Union address, Trump said:

"Legal immigrants enrich our nation and strengthen our society in countless ways. I want people to come into our country, in the largest numbers ever , but they have to come in legally." [5]

As Breitbart very accurately pointed out, Trump is using the usual "legal/good, illegal/bad dodge". In contrast to Europe, where people criticize Third World immigration as a whole, the debate in the United States has been manipulated into a "legal/good", "illegal/bad" argument. In other words, if the government officially approves Africans, Arabs and Latinos to enter the United States, it is "good".

But one can ask: how is that good? Yes, they pay taxes. Fine. Them adding to GDP is already neutral, because it is the distribution of wealth that matters most. For the rest these immigrants keep wages low, which to a degree is important for international competition, but mainly benefits big business. Most problematic, of course, is that you are still dealing with the exact same cultural, genetic IQ and ethnic crime issues as with "illegal" immigration. The whole social and cultural element of society is purposely overlooked. And what is left of a society that has no social and cultural backbone anymore? Is such a society even worth saving?

As for the numbers, under Trump indeed we've seen "the largest numbers ever" of Third World immigration into the U.S., standing in 2019 at about 1.2 million per year. As Breitbart explained:

"That is a massive inflow of legal immigrant workers who are eager to take jobs at lower wages from the 4 million young Americans who enter the workforce each year. The inflow of extra labor generates massive profits and gains for CEOs, employers, investors, and real estate owners."

Legal or illegal immigration, as the debate has been framed in the U.S., really makes little difference in the crime, social and cultural problems these immigrants cause.

When the Coronovirus pandemic hit the United States in March 2020 with over 3 millions workers already unemployed by the end of the month, Trump's secretary of state Mike Pompeo announced that his State Department had decided to waive in-person interviews for "blue collar" temporary foreign VISA workers (effectively not "immigrants") in the H-2 program, who mainly enter the agriculture, landscaping, restaurant, and hotel industries. [6] At the exact same time, it was reported that the H-1B VISA program would continue unmitigated, bringing in "white collar" foreign workers into America's Fortune 500 tech, banking, health care, engineering, science, teaching, insurance and other industries. According to Breitbart, this process is based on greed, where the lower labor costs are divided among CEOs and stock holders, increasing the wealth gap. [7] Undoubtedly that's a good part of what is going on, but it's a good question if that is all there is to it.

One thing should be clear though: these VISA programs do not just exist to supplement American labor shortages. No matter how they invest the profits, they exist to increase the profit margin of American corporations. They want low-wage slaves. And they want to indefinitely expand the economy through immigration and erasing all economic borders. The 1994 NAFTA agreement is an example of that. It very much looks as if big business is looking to turn American, Canada and Mexico into one country, eventually to be followed by all of the Americas. In fact, despite heavy lobbying from David Rockefeller and allies, the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) agreement fell through in 2005. This would have turned all of the Americas, except for Cuba, into a free trade zone, once again making it easier to bring all of Latin America into the United States.

The NAFTA deal of 1994 destroyed the Mexican economy, aiding drug cartels and forcing millions of economic refugees into the U.S. Luckily the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) deal fell through in 2005.

In addition, ISIS and the removal of Gaddafi under Obama created huge Muslim and black refugee streams into Europe.

To summarize, looking at immigration numbers and policy, a vote for Trump has demonstrated to make no effective difference in the wholesale replacement of white people by Third World wage slaves. The multinationals are picking the fruit by getting all the unorganized cheap labor they desire and governments and society as a whole will have to deal with all the costly, bad apples. Voting for Trump has indeed proved to be a "protest" and a "populist" vote on the immigration issue. He has been unable to implement any radical changes, and it could well be that he was never supposed to. Look, for example, also how Silicon Valley has been relentlessly propagandizing against him, censoring him and his followers in every way they can. But what has Trump effectively done about it? Nothing. He even continues to use Twitter as his primary platform to communicate with the world. He just doesn't change anything.

Just by looking at Trump's cabinet appointments, many are right-wing globalists close to George Shultz and Henry Kissinger through NGOs as the Hoover Institution, CSIS and Spirit of America. Ivanka Trump's closest ally since the election campaign has been Trilateral Commission member and Goldman Sachs Foundation president Dina Habib Powell. In addition, (alleged) arch-conservatives as Trump, with their love for "small government" and hatred of labor rights/ "socialism" (a minimum wage, a maximum number of working hours, etc.), have always been on the side of cartels and monopolies. And the only thing they want is cheap Third World immigration.

2020: Black Lives Matter and "white guilt" go mainstream

Anything you put money in and the media gives attention to grows: so much seems clear. Back in 2014-2015 Black Lives Matter was rather a fringe group. In 2017, despite an extreme media bias in favor of the group, support for Black Lives Matter stood at 35% among whites, mainly among women and children. For a long time it looked as if the group would just fizzle out. Then, in May 2020, there was the murder, or virtual murder, of George Floyd by Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin.

2014: tiny police officers trying to restrain a resisting, serial offending, morbidly obese Eric Garner, with the antifa Copwatch filming (certainly PoliceWatch was set up by Van Jones and his Google-, Hewlett Foundation and Soros-funded Ella Baker Center).

Nothing going on really, but Garner's family was paid $5.9 million and the cop in question - eventually, in August 2019 - fired.

Floyd's case is not dissimlar to the first "I can't breathe" incident, Eric Garner of 2014. Garner had been arrested 31 times over a period of 34 years over anything from assault to grand larceny. Garner died after resisting arrest and being put in a choke hold, this while weighing 350 pounds and suffering from "heart disease, severe asthma, diabetes, obesity, and sleep apnea." The 6'4" George Floyd wasn't a saint either. Far from it. And he too resisted arrest while suffering from serious health issues.

Between 1997 and 2007, Floyd had been arrested with an average of once a year for theft, robbery with a firearm, criminal trespassing, repeated cocaine possession and eventually, in 2007, for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. In this last case he was part of a gang of six who broke into a house, held the two Latino women and their one-year-old daughter inside at gunpoint, while searching the house for money and drugs. Floyd threatened one of the women by pressing a gun in her abdomen, while an associate beat her after she screamed for help. For this last incident he stayed in prison until 2014, after which he moved to Minneapolis.

In Minneapolis Floyd does appear to have tried to change his ways a bit. Unfortunately, and as all too common in the black community, he appears to have prided himself with being an "OG", or "original gangster", a type of status required to help connect the church to wayward black youth. He also kept struggling with drug abuse and all too easily resorted back to thieving.

To illustrate, the day of his fatal arrest he paid for a pack of cigarettes with a counterfeit $20 bill. After store personnel confronted him outside, with Floyd sitting on his car, he refused to return the money and was described by personnel as being "awfully drunk" and "not in control of himself ... not acting right." The coroner's report appears to explain why: "fentanyl intoxication; recent methamphetamine use." Also, as he was arrested, Floyd dropped two small baggies with a white substance that were not observed by the police.

Maybe worse, Floyd didn't just act erratically to the police. He acted like a typical criminal by being obsessed with obstructing and annoying the police in every possible way: always playing the victim, always claiming to be innocent, always insinuating or claiming police brutality, always maximally obstructing while claiming not to do that.

Conveniently, the bodycam footage of the arrest was only released with a solid two month delay, but it shows exactly what many already suspected. The officers are trying to be civil, but Floyd is just being dumb, annoying and erratic beyond belief. Let's produce a quick transcript of the bodycam footage:

"Whoa! Damn man, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry. Please, please, I didn't do nothing.



[Only now the cop points his gun to Floyd, who has to be asked non-stop if he can put his hands on the wheel. Floyd only does this for 1 second, and as a result represents a serious threat.]

First doesn't want to leave the driver's seat of his own car; next absolutely refuses to sit in the police car, because he's "too claustrophobic" and "can't breathe" as a result (and also is worried about Covid...). Most people don't even realize: This is how little 2pacs troll and obstruct te police.

The gun here was only raised after Floyd refused to comply with keeping his hands on the wheel. Even after the gun, he absolutely would not listen.

It's incredible how the Daily Mail, which released this bodycam footage, shamelessly and bizarrely went along with the white guilt: "[This image] shows a rookie officer terrifying Floyd by pointing a handgun." Unsurpringly, the comment section did not agree with the Daily Mail's position.

"Eh! Alright! What did I do though? [Turns away to passenger, still flapping his arms:] What we do? God! I got shot before. I got shot. Yes sir! I'm sorry, sergeant. I'm so sorry.

"Goddamn man, I got shot the same way as before. Oh, I'm so sorry, officer. [Starts crying] Please, I don't have any beef with you. Don't shoot me, please man. Please! ... I just lost my mom, man [note: two years before]. Please don't shoot me, Mr. Officer. ... You not gonna shoot me, man? Okay, man [I'll get out of the vehicle]. Please, man. Please, man.

[Floyd doesn't step out, doesn't sit still, and doesn't keep his hands on the wheel, so the officer starts pulling his arm. A woman screams at him: "Stop resisting!" Next Floyd is gently escorted to the wall and then a police car:]

"Oh! Ouchie, man! Damn, man!

[Officer: "Keep him on his feet!"] [Much inaudible, but Floyd is kept up against a police car and threated very gently:]

"I'll do anything, man. I'm not resisting, man. I didn't do nothing to you all. I'm not that kind of guy. Please, Mr. Officer. Don't leave me by myself, man. I'm claustrophobic.

[Friendly police officer: "Well, you are still going in the car." Another: "Do you have anything sharp on you?"] [Inaudible whining of Floyd, followed by:]

"I'm claustrophic for real, Mr. Officer. Can you please beg 'em for me, Mr. Officer? For me? Stay with me, man.

[Officer: "I will." - Floyd stays outside of the car:]

"Please man, I didn't do nothing. I didn't do nothing to you all.

[Refuses to get in the car. Officer: "We'll roll the windows down." Others: "Take a seat!"]



"Why don't you all believe me? I'm not that kind a guy, man. Imma gonna die in there, man. I'm gonna die!



[Officer: "Take a seat!"]



"And I just had Covid, man. I won't go back to that! [Keeps yelling and resisting; won't go in the car] Man, when I stop breathing, it's gonna go out on me, man. Okay, okay, okay, let me count to three and then I'm going in. I'm not trying to win. I'll lie on the ground. I'll do anything. I'm claustrophobic. God, I'm claustrophobic.



[Both pushing and pulling him in onto the backseat of the car, still quite gently:]



"No, I can't. Choke. I can't breathe, officer! Ah! Ah! My wrist, man! My wrist! I'll lay on the ground. I'll lay on the ground. [Now he's on the ground and instantly start yelling:] I can't breath! I can't breath!"

The woman sitting in the car with him - who claims Floyd is her "ex-man", initially isn't too cooperative either. When asked to move back towards the wall, she goes, "Me? What did I do?" When asked why Floyd is "getting all squirly and not showing his hands?", she goes, "Because he's been shot before. [Points to her brain:] He got a thing going on. No, [he's not on something] [note: this is a lie]. He got a thing going on. We have problems all the time with the police, especially when that men stood [with] that gun like that."

So Floyd has trouble with the police all the time? That's nice to hear. It's also not particularly surprising looking at his behavior. As said, it's how most repeat criminals - Third World ones in particular - behave to police officers and prison guards, all the time. The amount of abuse these officers take is absolutely incredible. And Floyd is fitting that profile. In any other country outside the West, he would have been hogtied and thrown in the trunk, tortured, or beaten to death with behavior like that. But here we allow it, with many online viewers actually taking Floyd's pleas serious.

May 25, 2020 killing of George Floyd. He's already unconscious here, with no pulse, but officer Chauvin keeps his knee on Floyd's neck, despite endless pleas from bystanders.

What you have here is a situation in which otherwise extremely/overly polite police officers simply can't tell for certain if Floyd is trolling them, or whether he is in genuine danger. That having been said, what Chauvin did was problematic to say the least. He kept his knee pressed into the neck of Floyd, despite him begging minutes-long for it to be removed: "Please, the knee in my neck, I can't breathe. ... Mama. ... Don't kill me." If anything, Chauvin pressed down on Floyd's neck harder, with the arteries on the side of the neck pinned inbetween the pavement and the knee. Even after Floyd went unconscious, with bystanders pointing this out again and again, Chauvin just kept on pressing, even grabbing his mace to let bystanders know not to intervene. His fellow officers detected no pulse and suggested that they roll Floyd over; Chauvin still wouldn't let off.

Yes, Floyd was yelling at the cops from the first second, "Please don't kill me. ... My mom just died. ... Ouchie! ... I just had Covid, man. ... Choke. I can't breath, officer! Ah! Ah! My wrist, man! ... God, I'm claustrophobic." He's also the one who volunteered to "lie on the ground". Chauvin also couldn't know about the fact that Floyd was "Arteriosclerotic [with] hypertensive heart disease", seemingly strongly contributing to his death.

All that still is no excuse for Chauvin's actions. There are migitating circumstances, but simply following the law he needs to be prosecuted not just for manslaughter, but really murder. There is no way around that. Everything is on video and that is the law. Should his fellow officers be prosecuted. In my view, no. They were very polite and correct to Floyd all the way through, and it was Floyd himself who wanted to lay on the ground. The officers also repeatedly suggest to Chauvin to ease off, but Chauvin is the one in charge and refuses to listen. He screwed over the rookie officers under his care with his actions, and really even every white person in the West.

ISGP looks at this differently, however. No matter what Chauvin's actions, the problem simply is one of unresponsible race mixing. Floyd and his entourage at the arrest scene gave off the impression of having very low (genetic) IQ, as none of them could talk or behave properly. Low genetic IQ is a major problem with pure black gene, as are the corresponding extremely high violent crime numbers that cause. Pure black gene has no business living in the West, except on a case by case basis. It's unsustainable and immoral to have them here in large numbers. They should be living in the Caribbean or Africa. No man, no problem.

BLM protests

Now that we got the details of this case out of the way, it might be more important to focus on the aftermath: namely, the media implementing the usual white guilt warfare, and with that actively inciting black riots and hatred against white people throughout the world. Protests and riots were organized under the Black Lives Matter banner, the same elite-funded group that caused the Ferguson riot of 2014 and the Baltimore riot of 2015. This time, however, the riots and looting went from coast to coast and even spilled over into Europe.

Top: Minneapolis building burned down in the wake of George Floyd murder, as was a police station.

Bottom: renewed Black Lives Matter looting, here in Santa Monica.

From the start, the Black Lives Matter movement was heavily influenced by George Soros, the biggest pusher of open borders to the Third World who also happens to be a veteran of Bilderberg, the Trilateral Commission, the CFR, the European CFR, the International Crisis Group, the Munich Security Conferences, the Bretton Woods Committee and more, operating in half of them alongside the likes of David Rockefeller and Henry Kissinger. His Open Society Foundations has got huge influence within the European Commission and the European Parliament, where at least 30% of MPs are considered "reliable friends".

Does that sound like an individual without any ulterior motives? Hardly, even more so because George Soros is the biggest pusher of unlimited Third World immigration into the West. Already in the late 1990s, he was sitting on the board of Refugees International, well ahead of the times.

As has been documented in great detail on this page, a handful of newspapers also figured out that Soros pumped $33 million into a wide variety of black activist NGOs that ended up (violently) protesting in Ferguson (2014) and Baltimore (2015) under the Black Lives Matter umbrella. In addition, DeRay Mckesson, a gay black man who has been a major force in the #BlackLivesMatter movement from the start, lived in a home owned by a director of the Baltimore chapter of Soros' Open Society Foundations. The Center for American Progress, founded by Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign manager John Podesta and funded by Soros, the Ford Foundation and Bill Gates, was another early financier, as were artists as Beyonce and Jay-Z. The donations of the latter two went through the "liberal CIA" New World Foundation, with its historic ties to the Rockefellers, Bilderberg and Hillary Clinton.

Statement that caused some consternation in 1958, during the early stages of the Rockefeller-funded Civil Rights movement. However, it was a 1957 hoax by the Hunt oil fortune-financed Jew-hating conspiracy author Eustace Mullins.

It's scarily prophetic though. And apart from cheap immigrant labor and women being too expensive when raising 2-3 children on average, seems to give the reason behind today's "white guilt" agenda, as pushed by the elites.

Mind you, the John Birch Society and the Mullins-allied Liberty Lobby for decades claimed the Rockefellers, the CFR, Bilderberg and the Trilateral Commission were part of a "communist" plot. It's code for "big business globalist". And it doesn't make the basis of what they wrote untrue.

Meanwhile, in 2016, the Ford Foundation set up the overarching Black-Led Movement Fund, with the intention of pumping $100 million into it over the next few years through a variety of allied "liberal CIA" foundations. Soros' Open Society Foundations and the Kellog, Tides and Nathan Cummings foundations were among these additional donors. In later years, Silicon Valley corporations and entertainment figures have been particularly active in donating several hundred thousand to several million dollars at a time to a variety of black activist groups. Hollywood has also been extremely supportive of a black insurrection in the West through films as Django Unchained (2012) and Black Panther (2018), not to get into the mass immigration aspect.

Predictably, with this amount of money and support, Black Lives Matter never went away. It staged all kinds of protests during the Trump campaign and subsequent presidency, often pitting it against rather pro-Nazi, pro-KKK "alt right" white supremacists (i.e. "conservative CIA"). In Europe it has had a limited presence as well. But it wasn't really until the murder of George Floyd that the group all of a sudden started having mainstream acceptance. In the days after, just about every major social media model, Hollywood actor, or other major entertainment industry star with a social media account made #BlackLivesMatter posts.

Soon there was George Soros again, right when mass protests started to simmer down a bit. On July 13, 2020 his Open Society Foundations announced another investment in "emerging [black] organizations and leaders" totalling an enormous $220 million. That's a confirmed $353 million dollars from just the Soros and Ford foundations alone over the 2014-2020 period, with countless additional donations to black groups to be found in grants lists in between.

This time corporations were not left in the dust by the "liberal CIA" foundations. In early July 2020, Silicon Valley giant PayPal - which never died despite crypto offering far cheaper (read: free), equally reliable payment systems - pledged $530 million to support black businesses hurt in the Corona crisis. Bank of America had done the same thing a month earlier, pledging no less than $1 billion over just four years to black and other minority causes. Days after, Nike, whose Nike Foundation receives millions from the Warren Buffett family annually, pledged $100 million over 10 years.

That is a combined treasure chest of $2 billion dollars, with likely billions more going to invested in black activism and riots over the next decade. That makes it hard to believe that somebody is not looking to destabilize and burn down the West at record pace - whatever the reason.

In contrast to the "liberal CIA" foundations and the executive board of Silicon Valley giants, a lot of what we see on social media actually is mere token-support; people being afraid to lose their income if they don't get on board with Black Lives Matter. On Instagram this especially went for those individuals only making a #BlackOutTuesday (June 2, 2020) post, with more than a few of them not even realizing, or wanting to realize, that they shouldn't be making any social media posts that day.

In case it involved a (rare) celebrity that was perceived as not giving enough support on social media, they were heckled by a variety of foreigners, dedicated white antifa and young teenagers with (heavily upvoted) comments as "Did you donate?", "Open your purse bae", "This isn't helping", "Post some links and sign some petitions this is bare minimum", etc.

Most worrying is that also a scary amount of hardcore white guilt propaganda, including white privilege claims, could be spotted for the first time. Let's cite a little from of what I personally noticed, mainly among mid-level models (and I didn't pay a whole lot of attention). It's pretty shocking and makes one see just how many people, women at the front it appears, have no issues at all with committing treason if there is enough pressure from above. Mass treason has become the norm.

English social media model with 1 million followers:



"please respectfully don't come onto my page and tell me that all lives matter, we know that, but this is not about you, this is about discrimination and this is about racism and this MUST stop, I hope this post filters out people that I don't wish to have following me anymore and I send all my love to everyone who is going through pain right now."



Australian-UK bisexual girl with 100,000 followers (and similarly superhot Goth girlfriend) reposting a quote of the Marxist Mimi Zhu:



Finding any excuse to tie LGBTQ and the open borders agenda together. Gays and lesbians seem to play a major role in BLM protests, apart from antifa and general youngsters. "Non-black people must do better. ... Call your racist family member out. Move beyond the internet to show your outrage and grief. Take action and do not remain complicit. ... This reminder can no longer be gentle. ...



" [Reposting Matt "nyc proud fairy" Bernstein:] Dear white followers ... At some point [you have] thought: "but I'm not racist." I have thought that too. ... all white people benefit from the same institutionalized racism. this does not mean all white people hate people of color -- it means that we all still benefit from their enduring oppression. we benefit from eurocentric school curriculums , we benefit from racial profiling, we benefit from racist jokes."



" [Repost:] Black Lives Matter: Key London Dates. Keep an eye on #LDNBLM on social media for updates. ... IMPORTANT: ... wear non-identifiable clothing ."



Girl located in Hawaii with a transgender fascination:



As one of the girls here proudly posted to the world: the antifa's "Statue Storm", discussed earlier by ISGP, continued during the 2020 BLM protests. Generally, only very extreme anarchists and cultural Marxists participate in these activities. Who financed them? Who brought them together? It should be investigated. Some of their faces are right there. "Black Lives Matter: Protest safely. Know your rights. ... SO: Turn off cellular data . ... Conceal tattoos, piercings and dyed hair. Wear brandless, shapeless black clothing. Wear masks , goggles, long sleeves and gloves to protect against tear gas and pepper spray. DO NOT: Take photo or video. Speak to the press. ... Speak to law enforcement without a lawyer. BRING: CASH... If you pay with a card, your activity can be traced.



" [Repost:] Now that you've made your statements & reposted those stories, how will you take it further? ... Do you listen to the black community? Make space for them? Do you protect black women from the relentless attacks they survive in your workplace? In your neighborhood? Do you address the colourism, the microaggressions? ... Do you still use your voice & stand by your words when you don't have a protective liberal bubble that repeats your thoughts?"



Australian girl with 120,000 followers:



"#BlackLivesMatter ... How to help the George Floyd protests from Australia. Channel the energy and anger you are feeling into action ."



Canadian fitness model with 300,000 followers reposting a post of actor Jerry Seinfeld's wife:



"Follow Blacknationapp ... If someone doesn't understand white privilege, show them this video. [vague video, apparently of white kids not wanting to give a black guy his credit and $100 bucks after he wins a sprint] ... [Repost of some some white pornstar-looking model:] Between the Trump, the protests, Covid, racism [spell-corrected], What a mess! ... Stay Woke!"



White guilt taken to the ultimate extreme: kneeling in front of blacks and begging them for forgiveness. It's beautiful in a way, but when are blacks going to beg us for forgiveness for their extreme crime levels? For all the black-on-white rape and murder? And put a stop to that? Asian-Latina, very new agy model with 3.5 million followers who is employed by a leading entertainment company -- reposting a very feminine male black model:



"A powerful show of unity and support. The white community kneeling down in front of the black community to ask for forgiveness after years of racism. The black community followed that up by kneeling down as well [not shown, and not with whites standing up] and they all eventually joined in prayer."



White model - similarly new age - employed by the same entertainment company, with 1 million followers:



" [Puts up art of 2pac - a godfather of gangsta rap - with the song lyrics:] I see no changes, all I see is racist faces. Misplaced hate makes disgrace to races. ...



" [Photo of a protest sign:] We said: Black Lives Matter. NEVER SAID: Only Black Lives Matter. WE KNOW: All lives matter. (duh). We just need YOUR HELP with #BlackLivesMatter, for BLACK LIVES are in DANGER.



" [Repost from a black screenwriter and director:] The Blackout Tuesday does NOT mean to simply post a black picture and leave social media for the day. It means to stop promoting your own stuff for 24 hours, and instead amplify the voices & projects of Black creators, writers, directors, activists and more. Pass it on.



"[Holds up a sign at a rally herself:] Imagine all the people living life in peace."



Canadian tattoo model with close to 1 million followers:



"Black Lives Matter. ... In the past few days I've seen accounts uploading and sharing footage of what's actually going on in the world, and we need to see that now more than ever. We cannot rely on big media to feed us manipulated coverage."



Famous YouTuber, actor, Flat Earth criticist, and generally all-round-cool-guy Logan Paul:



"I'm embarrassed that it's taken me 25 years to realize this: It is not enough to be not racist. You have to be anti-racist. Condemn those who feign superiority because of the color of their skin.



"Friends – hold friends accountable. Hold your family accountable. Hold yourself accountable. And most importantly, we must hold our authorities accountable – police officers, politicians, policy-makers. As Killer Mike said, bully the politicians at the voting booth. Make your voice heard. Attend a protest. Speak up against injustice. If you're white, if you look like me, use your privilege.



Logan Paul's pro-BLM speech literally appears written for him by someone at the Open Society Foundations, pretty much identifying him on the spot as a "sleeper": a "liberal CIA" propagandist. Seeing his chemtrails, Hollywood and Alex Jones associations, things immediately make sense again. "And for those of you who do not think white privilege exists, you are f**king blind. You are delusional, and you are part of the problem. ... Acknowledge and weaponize your privilige. I believe we are going to a protest today. And you bet your fucking ass I'll be in the front line. ...



"If you are an influencer or a celebrity friend of mine, I hope you are using your platform to spread the message of solidarity and unity. ... We must now reverse engineer the system, as a collective. We must open our eyes and realize that there is only one race, and that is the human race.



"On behalf of Breonna Taylor, we must change. On behalf of Ahmaud Arbery, we must advance. And on behalf of George Floyd and the hundreds of others who have been unjustly murdered in this country, we must evolve."



"[Instagram picture of 13-year-old-or-so gay black girl holding up a sign that reads, "Support Black Lives the way you appropriate black culture":] You can't be black AND gay," she joked. [ Note: that's a problem of the intolerant black community, as well as Muslims - not our fault] ... White people -- it's been over 400 years of injustices and the "United" States of America still haven't figured it out. Become an ally. Get uncomfortable, have the difficult conversations, show up to a protest, support black owned businesses, unlearn and educate yourself about the black experience. Amplify the voices of your brothers and sisters... our white ancestors caused this shit, we gotta fix this shit. Racism ends with our generation."



Conspiracy-loving half-white-half-Arab European Playboy model known to have moonlighted as a Dubai prostitute:



Official BLM policy: "We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure..." "Corona is a hoax. Black lives matter indeed [is not]. ... I cried my eyes out watching the news updates two days ago [surrounding George Floyd]. ... Did George Soros pay rioters? Hell yes [ Explanation: There exists disinfo about Soros paying individual protestors; the fact that he funded BLM as a whole is left out.] . Are bricks laid down for people to throw by the government? Hell yes. [ Explanation: Virtually all brick piles could be linked to construction projects planned before Floyd's death. Others were guarded by police or in the process of being removed over rioting precautions.] So when I use my brain to think about these subject.. I get called out for being racist.. does my curiosity to the bigger picture behind the death of a man [disinfo taken from "the_truth_hunters"] make my sadness less? No.



" [Imagine of aliens in their UFO over the Earth:] "[Humans] kinda became delusional and imagined these invisible borders, beliefs and structures separating them..."



[Links to a post of black conspiracy disinformer "Dr. Malade Fanfaron" with the caption "hairlines don't lie" , suggesting police officer Derek Chauvin is not the real killer of George Floyd (no issue to be seen, except that after 8 years his hair withdrew a bit on the sides):] "Family they are pulling the sheets over our eyes!!! Let's not let the fall dummy fool us to believe the real killer has been captured... Stay woke!"



"What do you think about this?" link of Adriana Lima to Instagram channel "Consciouss_Thoughts" of "Young Pharaoh", another black version of Alex Jones:



"They couldn't just kill motherfuckers directly. So they tried to do it with the vaccines. That didn't work, so now they are trying to instigate you to be violent. ...



"They put these deep state motherfuckers in law enforcement to encite and instigate violence, and mistrust between the citizens and law enforcement. And then they are gonna use that to create riots - like they just did - to enact martial law. And then they wanna bring in martial law to bring in the New World Order. So it's not, "Fuck ALL of the police." You have to realize the police has been infiltrated.



"Now if you don't believe me, look at the police tearing their own shit up! [Explanation: cops taking out a broken windshield, after kids destroyed it - of which there is video...] [And here] the police is promoting crime. It's not US! It's THEM! ... Look, they are telling this bitch what to spray. She is spraying "Black Lives Matter" on the wall. ... That's not [even] a black person. Look, she put the "A" on the wall. The "A" is for "Anarchy". [Explanation: The police officers are talking to someone while a fat teenage girl keeps spraying an already totally vandalized wall. An older fat woman telling the young one to spray something isn't police...] ...



"Get your dumb ass in the house and demand that these motherfuckers arrest Bill Gates, George Soros and everybody else. [Note: Still hasn't explained that Soros funded and pretty much ran BLM early on.] Stop rioting! This is what they want. They started it. ... Freemasons are real! It's not a f*cking fantasy. They have infiltrated every layer of this motherf*cking country! And they are using it to make everybody hate [each other]. ... Now, this nigger admitted that he was a paid protestor. ... Nigger said you go to GeorgeSoros.com! [Explanation: involves a 2017 troll video of "liberal CIA" outlet The Young Turks.] ... It's not the white people doing this! I'ts the freemasons! ... Who put the motherfucking bricks down there? I know niggers didn't do this. ... The government supplied the bricks for you to use in the riots. [Explanation: See previous model.] "



A few things can be observed in these Instagram posts:

Obviously a total and complete absence of information that blacks commit 5 to 30x the heavy crime compared to whites and purely genetically lack about 15 IQ points compared to whites - largely explaining the levels of crime.

and compared to whites - largely explaining the levels of crime.

The reposted messages generally are very passive-aggressive, specifically designed to foster a gang-mentality and make people who oppose Black Lives Matter feel isolated, unloved, "racist" and mentally handicapped. The principles on which many statements were put together, clearly have a common "liberal CIA" origin, indicating that there are handlers or "influencers" operating in the background of at least some semi-celebrities.



"White Folks Guide to Protesting" that was spread among Canadian and Australian Black Lives Matter-allied protest groups. Even many white antifa weren't thrilled with it. But the boundaries get stretched further and further, similar to the groups of white protesters getting on their knees for blacks over colonial crimes. Probably the most bizarre is the coordinated, psywar-like effort to relentlessly instill "white guilt" into the white masses, while increasingly elevating black people to the status of being the masters of the white race. It is extremely reminiscent of the hoaxed 1957 quote of later famous conspiracy author Eustace Mullins:



"While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavor to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their [colonialist] exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life... With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites..."

You can hardly profess this opinion though - due to the existence of this hoax. That's very convenient, because let's face it, this is exactly what is going on. If intermarriage, forced-interracial-sex-to-combat-"racism", or mass rape of white women by black men will be the endgame, remains to be seen. Personally, I can't unremember an encounter with an otherwise friendly black man here in the Netherlands - part of some black group I unfortunately forgot the name of - who explained to all whites he encountered that:



"When black people get into power, all your dicks are gonna go off. We are gonna cut your bellies open. Torture you. And rape all your women. That's just what is gonna happen. You've been doing it to us, so we are going to do it to you."

I guess we'll see what the future brings.

You can hardly profess this opinion though - due to the existence of this hoax. That's very convenient, because let's face it, this is exactly what is going on. If intermarriage, forced-interracial-sex-to-combat-"racism", or mass rape of white women by black men will be the endgame, remains to be seen. Personally, I can't unremember an encounter with an otherwise friendly black man here in the Netherlands - part of some black group I unfortunately forgot the name of - who explained to all whites he encountered that: I guess we'll see what the future brings.

The instructions on Black Lives Matter flyers - in a deniable way - seem to be specifically designed to create an atmosphere of animosity towards ALL law enforcement and to promote rioting and looting by explaining in great detail how activists can prevent being identified in any way (Really? Why feel the need if you peacefully protest? Why dress up like the black antifa army?). The flyers also very often do not specifically mention "peaceful" protesting, despite knowing full well that black people have a particular affinity for rioting and looting - and hate the police.



We have a Playboy model and Adriana Lima linking to black conspiracy disinformation artists who both appear to have escaped from black supremacy cult The Nuwaubian Nation. Their only purpose is to help brainwash black people in a slightly different way than through Black Lives Matter and keep everyone running around like headless chickens. They will protest Trump's attempts to bring back order, elites will be kept in place, and third World immigration will continue. So nothing changes.



Not seen in these above quotes, but certainly very prominent among Black Lives Matter pushers are quotes of Martin Luther King Jr. ("There comes a time when silence is betrayal."), top superclass member Desmond Tutu ("If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chose the side of the oppressor.") and Nelson Mandela were making the rounds everywhere. Ironically, all three were solidly backed by the Rockefeller family, representing the exact same elite interest as George Soros supporting Black Lives Matter.

The most important count-down clock on the planet for whites - but only to be found on the Nazi website The Daily Stormer... White birthrates are around 1.5 and we are not allowed to up them... Why not?

So, what on Earth are we witnessing here? All the psychological warfare, propaganda, disinformation and misdirection related to white guilt - discussed in ISGP's White Guilt Warfare Manual - that for years we've seen coming from politicians, the dominant liberal media, Silicon Valley CEOs, Hollywood actors, musicians, Twitter trolls, and "liberal CIA"-funded action groups -- now all of a sudden are also being propagandized by countless seemingly ordinary Instagram models. A great many others have also been providing token support for Black Lives Matter with their #BlackOutTuesday posts of June 2, 2020.

It's really interesting to see how easy it is to commit treason. The whole idea that you can lean back and fix everything with "love", as so many girls in particular like to promote, is utterly irrational. It might be acceptable in the classical role play in which women simply take care of the home and the kids, but in today's "equal, feminist" society, that type of laziness and irresponsibility should not be tolerated. Neither maybe putting out any messages without using capital letters and periods...

What is additionally worrying is that going through comment sections of various Instagram channels - much of it dominated by youngsters from the Third World - is that no one really understands what is going on. Most - at least those who dare to comment - agree with the notion that the cops shouldn't be so racist. But what they forget are the vastly heightened crime numbers for blacks - and lower genetic IQ numbers - making any kind of "equality" within any multicultural society virtually an impossibility.

In any case, for the time being Black Lives Matter is an international phenomenon, and almost globally on social media. And it's all due to $100 million+ in "liberal CIA" foundation money, Hollywood, Silicon Valley, the media, and the radicalization of lots and lots of blacks, gays, lesbians, trannies and youths - women in particular.

Even the Anonymous hacking group was activated again on May 31, 2020, days after Floyd's death and very actively started promoting violent, destructive rioting and lootings, firmly establishing this group as well as being under the same "liberal CIA" influence.

What has been going on throughout the West, really is a very well-funded CIA coup, as many countries around the world have experienced in the past 70 years. It doesn't seem to have any purpose though besides collapsing white culture and ending western civilization, replacing it with some kind of big business-oriented multi-etnic social nightmare.

EUROPE



Europe: "anti-racism" wars of the EU and George Soros - with sometimes the White House mixed in

In terms of immigration the situation in Europe is completely different, but ultimately just as bad and controversial. The most criminal ethnic group in the United States by far - blacks - have been in the United States for centuries because of the slave trade to Latin America and America's south. The second most problematic group - Muslims - "only" stand at about 2% of the U.S. population anno 2018. A portion of these Muslim immigrants is black, such as the Somalis, and actually will soon demonstrate to have higher crime numbers than American blacks, especially in the sex crimes department. The most dominant immigration group in the United States are the Latinos. While problematic in terms of culture, crime and genetic IQ, ultimately it's a culture that is somewhat compatible with the West. There's a difference though between the American Indians of Central America and the predominantly Hispanic white civilizations in the southern portion of South American.

Compare this to western Europe where African blacks and Arab Muslims - very criminal cultures, with the latter also extremely ideologically hostile to western ways of living - are pouring into Europe at almost similar rates as the Latin Americans into the United States, and it's not hard to see why opposition to immigration in Europe is at an even higher rate as it is in the United States. Traditional western culture in major western European cities has been all but wiped away, apart from a handful of commercial and upper class districts.

November 14, 2017: UKIP's Nigel Farage criticizing Soros collaboration with EU parliamentarians.

Absolutely none of this matters to the liberal superclass, however. Crime numbers are hidden and white people, especially the men, are increasingly turned into the enemy. The primary culprit here in Europe is George Soros. While in the United States he is strongly supported by the Ford Foundation and a number of more minor foundations, when it comes to Europe, Soros' Open Society Foundations in particular has developed a very close relationship with the European Commission and the European Parliament. Meanwhile, his International Crisis Group and European Council on Foreign Relations is employing an army of former EU prime ministers and presidents, all continuing the battle for open borders. Obviously, Soros is just a "left-wing" offshoot of the Trilateral Commission and Bilderberg, other globalist NGOs fully dedicated to open borders.

As for examples of Soros' influence with the European Commission and the European Parliament, on November 14, 2017, former Euroskeptic UKIP head Nigel Farage held one of his infamous speeches at the European Parliament in Strasbourg, during which he targeted Soros in unusually candid language:

"I'm going to come back to "so what" and it may have some personal interest for you as well. ...



"I just wonder ... when we're talking about political subversion, when we're talking about collusion, I wonder whether we're looking in the wrong place. And I say that because George Soros recently gave Open Society, his organisation, ... he recently gave it 18 billion dollars. And his influence here and in Brussels [with just the $2 billion that it was previously already] is truly extraordinary.



"Open Society boasts that they had 42 meetings last year [in 2016] with the European Commission. They have even published a book of "reliable" friends in the European Parliament and there are 226 names [out of 751] on that list - including yours, sir. I thought you'd find this interesting.



"We even had last week [former Belgian prime minister and EMP] Mr Verhofstadt lobbying on behalf of Mr. Soros at the Conference of Presidents [of the EU] in a battle that is going on with Viktor Orban, the Prime Minister of Hungary."

To provide more examples of Soros' influence in Europe, in 1997 the European Network Against Racism (ENAR) was founded. It consists of a EU-wide network of roughly 120 "grassroots" antifa-type action groups that "combat racism". Roughly 80% of the funds are paid for by the European Union, 17% by George Soros. Of course, ENAR is silent about the vastly higher crime numbers Third World immigrants bring. It also riles up foreigners against the police by continually making an issue out of "police brutality", even though many countries in western Europe have incredibly soft-handed police services that basically are 100% talk and 0% violence. Members of foreign ethnicity youth gangs are walking over them at will. It's a completely unpractical and irrational agenda copied from the United States.

The ENAR-UNITED-EU-Soros alliance, with a little bit of Rothschild mixed in.

Another example is UNITED for Intercultural Action. The organization boasts that it is "supported by more than 550 organisations from all European countries" that, during the annual "European Action Week Against Racism" fights against "nationalism, racism, fascism and in support of migrants and refugees." Obviously, the list of membership organizations consists of countless antifa groups, such as the "Antifaschistisches Info Blatt, Germany" and the "Antifa Netwerk, Belgium", combined with peculiar immigration groups with names as the "Ass. Iranian Students" and the "National Afro-Swedish Association, Sweden". One wonders how many of these groups are ran by informants of the EU's national security services. In any case, these groups are deployed throughout Europe each year on March 21, simulating "grassroots" protests, along with other elite-backed antifa, communist and anarchist groups, such as those part of the European Network Against Racism (ENAR).

Also with UNITED, part of the financing comes from George Soros' Open Society Foundations, although the majority seems to come from various bodies of the European Union and national governments in Europe. The Rothschild Foundation also chips in, likely on behalf of the Jews to counter anti-Semitism. With millions upon millions of Muslim pouring into Europe, this is only going to get worse though.

Another interesting group is the Migration Policy Group, which claims to have "played a pivotal role in shaping European migration, integration and anti-discrimination policies and law [with] many original MPG initiatives [having] become established features of the European Union's legal and policy landscape." Financing for the Migration Policy Group has come from Atlantic Philanthropies and Soros' Open Society Foundations.

From the EU to the national level

The Netherlands: EU and Soros-backed Dutch antifa and intelligence networks

Soros' influence goes deeper than just through the structures of the EU itself. Here in the Netherlands, Soros' Open Society Foundations helps finance the Euro-Mediterranean Center Migration & Development (EMCEMO), a collective of more than 100 antifa, green, anarchist, communist, feminist, Islamic and black African protest groups. Everything and everyone is lumped together, from the Society of Ethiopians and the National Council of Moroccans, to the New Communist Party and mainstream left-wing parties as the GreenLeft and Labour. Some of the involved groups can also be found in the previously-discussed European Network Against Racism (ENAR) and UNITED, large collectives of action groups coordinated and funded by the EU and Soros, with a little Rothschild money mixed in.

Annual 21 March Committee - and EMCEMO - protestors in the Netherlands, with many of the groups tied to government or Soros financing, or having peculiar security state ties. At the EU level these groups tie into the Soros and EU-funded ENAR and UNITED NGOs. Protestors mainly consist of extreme socialists, anarchists, communists, Muslims, blacks, globalist feminists, and members/employees of existing political parties.

All EMCEMO membership groups annually protest in the Netherlands during UNITED's "European Action Week Against Racism" surrounding March 21. In fact, one member of the Soros-funded EMCEMO group is the 21 March Committee, another overarching antifa, communist, Muslim, etc. collection of protests group: about 60 in this case. Of the 30 or so that are eligible for government financing, 10 actually receive it. Two major groups, EMCEMO and UNITED, as we already know, receive EU and George Soros financing. Another, the Report Islamophobia Foundation has also received Soros funding. The Dutch branch of the huge Women's March is there, whose U.S. counterpart is deeply tied to Soros, Ford Foundation, Warren Buffett and other elite funds.

So many additional interesting names are to be found in the 21 March Committee: the Socialist International, the white-hating, increasingly popular DENK Party of extremist Turkish Muslims, various anti-Black Pete outfits, whom we will get in a minute; etc. Much it is also to be found in EMCEMO and/or UNITED.

There's also the Pirate Party Amsterdam, headed by fetish model Ancilla Tilia van de Leest. She's quite easy to identify as an intelligence asset for her appearance in February 2016 on the "conservative CIA" Infowars radio show of Alex Jones. On the opposite side of the spectrum, she's a signer of the standwithsnowden.com petition, along with George Soros, Alex Soros, and a long list of prominent "liberal CIA" assets. Apart from her Pirate Party activism, she's a privacy advocate (including the right to cash money - which banks increasingly oppose). In this last capacity she serves as one of four board members of the Dutch Privacy First Foundation, a type of NGO that in the U.S. generally receives funding from foundations as Ford, Soros and Rockefeller. Lo and behold, in the 2015 annual report, p. 12, we read that the Privacy First Foundation is funded by the earlier-mentioned, Soros-allied Democracy and Media Foundation:

"Since early 2015, this project is supported financially by the Democracy & Media Foundation (Stichting Democratie en Media)."

February 17, 2016: Ancilla van de Leest on Alex Jones' Infowars for her Pirate Party and privacy activism. Half of Jones' family is CIA, he is the world's biggest conspiracy disinformer, and it appears he only allows intelligence assets on his radio program. So once again running into Ancilla was not too much of a surprise.

Anno 2018 the Democracy & Media Foundation still is listed as a "partner" on the website of Privacy First. Ironically, in the past I have regularly seen Privacy First being featured on Nu.nl as a genuinely "independent" watchdog of Dutch intelligence and its various schemes to counter "terrorist activity" - a problem which obviously is only going to grow worse as more and more Arabs are brought into Europe. I always was suspicious of this watchdog agency, and, as usual, for good reason, it turns out. Clearly Privacy First is just an artifically propped-up authority, brought into existence to similate a largely non-existent democratic process.

Privacy First is not the only such group either. Bits of Freedom, with its annual Big Brother Awards that are occasionally mentioned on the news, is the Netherlands' leading "citizen's privacy protection" platform. Financiers? Soros' Open Society Foundations, the Ford Foundation and... the Democracy & Media Foundation. The overseeing international organization is Privacy International, similarly financed by the Soros and Ford foundations.

As for additional details on the Democracy & Media Foundation, it is the most significant minority stakeholder in The Press Group, responsible for printing most leading Dutch newspapers. Also on other occasions, besides Bits of Freedom, it has cooperated with George Soros' Open Society Foundations. In recent years both were funding anti-"Islamophobia" street protests groups - immediately ahead of elections.

Supervisory board chair of the The Democracy and Media Foundation is Alex Brenninkmeijer, a member of an elite family tied to Prince Bernhard's 1001 Club, the Knights of Malta, Opus Dei, and the Jesuits. Ironically, since 2014 Brenninkmeijer is national "ombudsman", tasked with "handling complaints of citizens about government conduct." Don't you just feel the soft blanket of protection coming from this office? The question, of course, is: for whom? The people? Or the government? And what does "government" even mean at this point? The fact that in 2014 Brenninkmeijer officially criticized the police for the 2011 arrest of the initial Black Pete protesters Quinsy Gario en Jerry Afriyie probably tells us enough. We'll get to these protesters in a minute.

Yet another interesting name within the Dutch 21 March Committee is the Nederland Palestina Komitee. This group was founded way back in 1969 by Kees Wagtendonk, a rather obvious agent of Dutch intelligence, and, more importantly here, by Mahmoud Rabbani, at the time the honorary consul of Kuwait and Jordan in the Netherlands. Rabbani quite clearly also was intelligence, because he became a close friend of the aristocratic banker Bib van Lanschot, reportedly a founder of the Dutch branch of the CIA's Stay Behind network, together with his friend Prince Bernhard. Coincidentally, Prince Bernhard invited both Van Lanschot and Rabbani to his elite 1001 Club, of which ISGP is the first to publish the membership lists.

If we switch back from the 21 March Committee to its Soros-funded partner group EMCEMO, we find more interesting members that absolutely need discussing. Prakken d'Oliveira is a major example. This is the "human rights" law firm of the curious Ties Prakken and Britta Bohler, which can also be linked, through the earlier-mentioned Bits of Freedom. The latter has previously been discussed on ISGP as a former member of the curious, suspected controlled opposition political group the Republican Society, together with her polar opposite, Pim Fortuyn. Fortuyn was assassinated in May 2002 by "liberal CIA"-funded environmentalist Volkert van der Graaf. The first thing Van der Graaf did after his arrest was request former Rote Armee Fraktion lawyer Pieter Bakker Schut to be his representative. Schut declined, but his activist ally Britta Bohler accepted, stepping down as chairman of ("liberal CIA"-funded) Greenpeace to do so. Bohler's later law partner, Ties Prakken, used to be the law partner of Schut, who, along with his wife, also played a pivotal role in the prominent Joris Demmink child abuse scandal in the Netherlands. In fact, his wife, fellow lawyer Adele van der Plas, is responsible for spreading copious amounts of conspiracy disinformation in the Demmink affair. Looking at these ties, Ties Prakken's role as a representative of the Collective Against Islamophobia and Discrimination seems mild in comparison. Key though is that Prakken, Bohler and Bakker Schut for decades have been involved in the managing and defending of controversial, often security state-tied, left-wing "radicals".

Incredibly, even at the local level here in my birth town of Rotterdam, the Soros influence can be observed in the form of the Platform for Islamic Education Rijnmond Foundation (SPIOR). In 2017, ahead of the election, it organized a debate about Islam and the state of "Islamophobia" in which all leading Dutch parties, except the leading populist one, participated. Representatives of SPIOR also regularly appear on local Rotterdam television to comment in favor of Islam-related issues and occasionally also are featured on national TV or a national newspaper. Apart from Soros' Open Society Foundations, funding also comes from the Soros-partnered Democracy and Media Foundation, the Oranje Fonds of the Orange royal family, the Prince Bernhard Culture Fund-linked VSB Fonds, the Maagdenhuis Foundation, which we will get back to; and Oxfam Novib.

The attack on Sinterklaas' Black Petes

Going back to the national level in the Netherlands, the Soros-funded EMCEMO group includes more interesting names, apart from the afore-mentioned antifa, communist, Muslim, and seemingly security state-linked groups. There's the New Urban Collective and StopBlackface.com, both founded and headed by a person named Mitchell Esajas; and the National Institute for the Netherlands Slavery Past and Heritage, employing a certain Quinsy Gario. There's also Kick Out Zwarte Piet, headed by semi-violent racist Jerry King Luther Afriyie. These three African blacks have regularly made the news starting in 2011 in their efforts to get the Zwarte Piet / Black Pete aspect of the children's feast Sinterklaas banned. They've done so in a vicious, propagandist manner by continually calling all native Dutch whites racist and by resorting to claims of non-existent "police brutality".

All that is fascinating, of course, considering Dutch police records, quite similar to other international ones, reveal that Dutch blacks are roughly 15 times more involved in cases of rape than whites (numbers on murder and robberies haven't been produced, even internally as far as we know), with the number only going up if violent street rape and gang rape is isolated. The majority of victims? White women. That alone makes one wonder if any native white Dutch should take any claims of racism or police brutality coming from the black community serious. Of course, the rape number just mentioned has never appeared in the media. And you won't hear any black activist talking about it either.

The entire European and Dutch aspect of this oversight and article actually started with African-Dutch Mitchell Esajas. After doing a whois of the website StopBlackface.com, of which Kick Out Zwarte Piet of Afriyie also is part, his name came up as admin. A quick check immediately revealed Esajas not to be any kind of grassroots activist at all: he's an Antillean black employed at the University of Amsterdam.

July 2016: Mitchell Esajas in Atlanta, the US, with the Soros and Ford Foundation-backed Black Lives Matter group, when a black snipe