The entire premise of this video is based on a false assumption.

He makes the valid point that non-combatant men get f~~~ed in armed post-government conflict. However he assumes that MGTOW are non-combatant. That’s incorrect.

MGTOW are not non-combatant. Just because they refuse to fight for someone else’s gynocentric bulls~~~ does not mean MGTOW don’t fight. MGTOW fight for themselves.

He also assumes that survivability depends entirely on access to some form of aid or assistance from an outside source, be it governmental or whatever. Well that is true for disposable blue pill non-combatants, but then blue pill fools get f~~~ed over no matter what. It doesn’t apply to MGTOW who refuse to be disposed of. MGTOW aid themselves.

Take the example of a sinking ship. Survivability on a sinking ship depends highly on access to aid and evacuation in the form of a limited number of lifeboats. Now in the past men suffered greatly in these scenarios thanks to the gynocentric rule of “ladies first”. A hell of a lot of men died when the Titanic went down thanks to their belief in that rule. But that rule only works as long as men abide by it. MGTOW don’t. And as the Costa Concordia sinking showed, neither do most men these days. Are you going to willingly go down with the ship just to let some feminist “all men are rapists” bitch have your seat on the lifeboat?

Didn’t think so.

That was then. MGTOW are now.