Machine learning is becoming more and more ubiquitous in our daily lives. From thermostats which know when you will be home, to smarter cars and the phone we have in our pocket. It seems like it is everywhere and that makes it an interesting field to explore! But what is machine learning? In general terms, it is a way for a system to learn and make predictions. This can be as simple as predicting relevant shopping items to as complex as a digital assistant.

With this blog post I will try to give an introduction into classification using the Naive Bayes classifier algorithm. It is an easy algorithm to implement while giving decent results. But it will need some statistic knowledge to understand, so bear with me. By the end of it you might see some applications and even try to implement it yourself!

Setup

So, what does the classifier want to achieve? Well, it should be able to guess if a sentence is Positive or Negative. For instance, "Symfony is the best" is a Positive sentence, while "No Symfony is bad" is a Negative sentence. So given a new sentence, I want the classifier to return the type without me implementing new rules.

From this, the basic setup for the classifier will be in a class called Classifier with a guess method. This method gets a sentence as input and will return either Positive or Negative. The class would like something like so:

class Classifier { public function guess($statement) {} }

Moreover, I prefer using a Enum-like class instead of strings. This Emum will be called Type and will contain POSITIVE and NEGATIVE constants. These constants which will be the output of the guess method.

class Type { const POSITIVE = 'positive'; const NEGATIVE = 'negative'; }

Setup done, time to create an algorithm that can make predictions!

Naive Bayes

Naive Bayes works by looking at a training set and makes a guess based on that training set. It does so using simple statistics and a bit of math to calculate the result. For example, when looking at the following training set, it consisting of 4 documents:

Statement Type Symfony is the best Positive PhpStorm is great Positive Iltar complains a lot Negative No Symfony is bad Negative

If given the sentence "Symfony is great" you can say that this input is a Positive statement. You usually do this by looking at what was taught before and make a decision on that information. This is what Naive Bayes also does: it looks at the training set and sees which type is more likely.

Learning

Before the algorithm can do anything, it requires a training set with historic information. It must know two things: which word occurs how many times for each Type , and how many documents (or statements) are there per Type . The implementation will store this information in two arrays. One which contains the word counts per Type and one which contains the documents counts per Type . All the other information can be aggregated from those arrays. The implementation would look like:

function learn($statement, $type) { $words = $this->getWords($statement); foreach ($words as $word) { if (!isset($this->words[$type][$word])) { $this->words[$type][$word] = 0; } $this->words[$type][$word]++; // increment the word count for the type } $this->documents[$type]++; // increment the document count for the type }

So with that set, the algorithm now has historic data so it can make educated guesses.

Definitions

To explain how the algorithm works a couple of definitions are needed. First of all, lets define the probability that the input is one of the given types. This is denoted with P(Type) . This is done by dividing the number of known documents of a Type , by the total of documents in the training set. A document is in this case an entry in the training set. For now, this method will be called totalP and would look like so:

function totalP($type) { return ($this->documents[$type] + 1) / (array_sum($this->documents) + 1); }

Note here that 1 is added to both the numerator and denominator. This is to prevent 0 probabilities which will ruin the total probability.

In the given example, both Positive and Negative would result in 0.6 . There are 2 items each of the total 4 documents so (2 + 1) / (4 + 1) .

The second definition is that of the probability of a word belonging to a certain Type. This is defined as P(word, Type) . This is done by first counting how often a word occurred in the training documents for the given Type . This result is then divided by the total words in the documents for that Type . This method is called p and would look like so:

function p($word, $type) { $count = isset($this->words[$type][$word]) ? $this->words[$type][$word] : 0; return ($count + 1) / (array_sum($this->words[$type]) + 1); }

In the training set, the probability the word "is" is Positive would be 0.375 . The word occurs twice in the total of 7 words for the Positive training set, which would result in (2 + 1) / (7 + 1) .

Finally, the algorithm should only consider words and ignore anything else. A simple method to give a list of words from a string can be implemented as such:

function getWords($string) { return preg_split('/\s+/', preg_replace('/[^A-Za-z0-9\s]/', '', strtolower($string))); }

All set, time to start implementing!

Guessing

To guess the Type of a sentence, the algorithm should calculate for each Type the probability given a sentence. Formally this is written would as P(Type, sentence) . The Type with the highest probability will be the result of the classification and returned by the algorithm.

To calculate P(Type, sentence) the algorithm uses Bayes' theorem. The theorem is defined as P(Type, sentence) = P(Type) * P(sentence, Type) / P(sentence) . This means that the probability for the Type given a sentence is the same as the probability of the Type times the probability for the sentence given a Type divided by the probability of the sentence.

Since the algorithm calculates each P(Type, sentence) for the same sentence, the P(sentence) is always the same. This means that it can be omitted since we only care about the highest probability, not the actual value. The simplified calculation would be: P(Type, sentence) = P(Type) * P(sentence, Type) .

Finally, to calculate P(sentence, Type) we can apply the chain rule to each word in the sentence. So if there are n words in the sentence this is the same as P(word_1, Type) * P(word_2, Type) * P(word_3, Type) * ... * P(word_n, Type) . The calculation of the probability of each word is using the definition as seen earlier.

Okay, all set, time for the actual implementation in php:

function guess($statement) { $words = $this->getWords($statement); // get the words $best_likelihood = 0; $best_type = null; foreach ($this->types as $type) { $likelihood = $this->pTotal($type); // calculate P(Type) foreach ($words as $word) { $likelihood *= $this->p($word, $type); // calculate P(word, Type) } if ($likelihood > $best_likelihood) { $best_likelihood = $likelihood; $best_type = $type; } } return $best_type; }

And that is it, now the algorithm can guess which type a statement is. All that is needed is to put it all together like so:

$classifier = new Classifier(); $classifier->learn('Symfony is the best', Type::POSITIVE); $classifier->learn('PhpStorm is great', Type::POSITIVE); $classifier->learn('Iltar complains a lot', Type::NEGATIVE); $classifier->learn('No Symfony is bad', Type::NEGATIVE); var_dump($classifier->guess('Symfony is great')); // string(8) "positive" var_dump($classifier->guess('I complain a lot')); // string(8) "negative"

The full implementation I have added to the git repository of this post, see Classifier.php

Wrapping up

There you have it! Even with a very small training set the algorithm can still return some decent results. In a real world example you would have hundreds of learning records to give more accurate results. For example, Naive Bayes has been proven to give decent results in sentiment analyses.

Moreover, Naive Bayes can be applied to more than just text. If you have other ways of calculating the probabilities of your metrics you can also plug those in and it will just as good.

Hopefully with this post you I have made the world of machine learning a bit more accessible to you. If you like this one, let me know in the comment below!

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.