A correction to an earlier version of this article has been appended to the end of the article.

The University of California disciplined more than 100 employees for sexual misconduct, about a quarter of them faculty members, at campuses across the state in the nearly three years before a scandal blew up at UC Berkeley, according to documents released Tuesday after a public records request from this news organization.

The records covered a period from January 2013 to April 2016, and were requested after a series of sexual harassment cases surfaced at Berkeley that brought down prominent researchers, deans and coaches. In all, campuses across the state released details Tuesday on more than 110 cases.

The documents show for the first time how widespread sexual harassment was across the 10-campus UC system beyond Berkeley and which schools had the biggest problems:

UC San Francisco had 26 cases, the most of any UC campus, ranging from a cook offering a co-worker money for sex to a top fertility doctor inappropriately touching nurses and calling them “bitches.”

UCLA had 25 cases, including a French professor who wrote over 300 poems professing his love to his graduate assistant, and a cancer researcher who sent sexually explicit jokes to colleagues and had been accused of sexual harassment twice before.

UC Davis had 13 cases and UC Irvine had 11 and UC San Diego had 9. UC Berkeley had released records of 19 cases last year.

The allegations ranged from inappropriate comments to sexual assault, according to a summary from UC President Janet Napolitano’s office.

About 58 percent of the cases were generated by complaints from staff members, 35 percent were from student complaints, and the rest are unknown or anonymous.

Seven percent of the cases involved sexual assault, including inappropriate touching and nonconsensual sex. About two-thirds of the people accused of misconduct no longer work for the university, Napolitano’s office said, but it isn’t clear how many were fired.

The sexual misconduct at UC San Francisco included doctors and professors, including Dr. Mitchell Rosen, the director of UCSF’s fertility preservation center. He was censured in 2015 after an anonymous call to the school’s whistleblower hotline accused the doctor of having a relationship with one of the nurses and creating a hostile work environment, including piggyback rides in the office and the use of inappropriate language. Rosen and the nurse denied the affair, but investigators determined it happened. Rosen told investigators he was surprised about the complaints, saying they were “making mountains out of mole hills.”

UCSF found that Dr. Richard Schneider sexually harassed one of his students over a two-year period, involving a sexual relationship that included trips to a strip club, attempted sex in his office and at a conference. “She felt she had no choice but to acquiesce since Schneider had significant power and control over her future career,” investigators found.

Schneider said the woman initiated the relationship, it was consensual and it did not impact her treatment in his lab, according to the report. In February 2015, Schneider was demoted from professor to associate professor and censured.

Efforts to reach the doctors Tuesday night were unsuccessful.

In a statement Tuesday, Barbara French, UCSF’s vice chancellor for university relations, said in all of the cases the university “took steps to stop the harassment, prevent its recurrence, and remedy its effects. Where violations occurred, they were addressed by appropriate actions, training, counseling and/or demonstrated improvement on the part of the respondent, or training for the department.”

UC Santa Cruz professor Hector Perla — one of four employees disciplined for sexual misconduct at the campus — resigned last year after a student accused him of raping her in June 2015 on the day before graduation. He claimed the sex was consensual, but late last month, the UC regents agreed to pay the former student $1.15 million after she accused UC Santa Cruz of failing to properly investigate her claims.

The UC campuses released the heavily redacted records Tuesday, 16 months after a public records request from the Bay Area News Group and other media organizations.

Victims advocates and student groups say UC Berkeley’s scandal exposed a double standard: University staffers were routinely fired or forced to resign, but tenured faculty members who committed similar transgressions usually received lighter sanctions and were allowed to keep their jobs.

The controversy led Napolitano to re-examine the rules governing how UC professors are disciplined for sexual misconduct. Many of Berkeley’s most elite members who violated the campus’s sexual misconduct policy were initially disciplined through secretive agreements with academic administrators rather than the formal faculty conduct process.

Since then, UC has overhauled its policies on sexual violence, from mandatory sexual assault training for students to improved investigation protocols, said Claire Doan, a spokeswoman for the Office of the President. One new policy makes sure that proposed sanctions for senior leaders found to have engaged in sexual misconduct — chancellors, vice-chancellors, coaches and deans — are reviewed by a committee on each campus to ensure a fair outcome.

“As soon as these cases came to light at Berkeley, the president said: ‘How are we going to tackle this? What are the problems? How are we going to make these changes to make the process more transparent and fair for everyone involved?’” Doan said.

Referring to the files released Tuesday, she said, “Most of these cases were adjudicated under old processes that are no longer in effect.”

In April 2016, Berkeley released records showing rampant sexual misconduct on campus since 2011. In all, 19 employees — including six professors — were disciplined, including world-renowned astronomy professor Geoff Marcy, the dean of the law school, the men’s diving coach and an assistant men’s basketball coach. Victims included seven students and 10 employees.

University officials say the scrutiny has led to positive reforms, but advocates for the victims of campus sexual misconduct are still concerned.

“Even with the new policies, faculty still have quite a few more protections than students and staff, so I wonder how much of a difference they really would add,” said Cory Hernandez, a third-year law student at UC Berkeley appointed last year to serve on a campus committee on sexual violence. “A lot of these committees aren’t getting to the root of the issue, which is there needs to be a culture change.”

Staff writer Tracy Seipel contributed to this story.

Correction: March 1, 2017

An earlier version of this story included a chart with incorrect information about the number of sexual misconduct cases at some of the campuses. The chart has been updated with the correct numbers.

Reading this on your phone? Stay up to date with our new, free mobile app. Get it from the Apple app store or the Google Play store.