



Back to the issue you identified though, it may well pose a problem with the establishment of many models of worker ownership, along with similar problems like the purposed problem of minority non-representation of say the more skilled workers etc (although it is worth noting the current situation does I would argue a worse job of it), the tariffs and subsidies argument (again I would say there are worse parallels in neocapitalism)



I don't know about that examples specifics, but remember there are many different possible ways for co-ops can be constructed, using a blend of things like representation, consensus and veto's, not all are the same construct(1). In general it could be said the argument generally is in large due to the advertisers and politics that control much of the media content, which require such structures to be demonized or marginalized(2), under the profit motive; In doing so it is much like an elephant and a mouse in a small room and the elephant complaining the mouse is taking up to much space; under capitalism the majority of all workers are non-people, without democratic influence, the creepy part to this is how much this is overlooked.



It doesn't mean that there is not a solution to this problem, or indeed that the problem would even exist in the new model, as a co-op based economy would not have to compete in the same way as it does in the current solely profit orientated climate; in any case transitional methods would have to be introduced.



Regulation would be the last and feasible option to your dilemma, or possibly a union/s exclusively for temps and freelance workers(3) in balance with the businesses. The perforable solution would be to end traditional wage labor eventually, having easy investment liquidity, transferability or a less profit driven method for investment would be a good step in what are supposed to be relatively free entry and exit opportunities(4).







If all those characters didn't stuff you full then here's a few links:

(1)

(2) www.you tube.com/watch?v=E8oHl3ooeZo&list=FLRJp-uT-r9ca6DwkTdinnAA&index=37&feature=plpp_video

(3)

(4)







PS My talents seem to reside in other places than the use of grammatical accuracy or restrain, hopefully it's in the content that it is made with.



PPS Hmm, maybe have gone a bit to far from this threads sheep pen now, I'm new here so I don't really know this forums code of conduct yet beyond T&Cs. ... the question is whether democratic worker ownership is more socially optimum than private hierarchical systems, after all this is the basis for an economic models ratification, and so the long and short term implications of both systems pro and cons must be weighed against each other to see which is desirable, the most fundamental aspects to address are the central dynamics, as I went into before.Back to the issue you identified though, it may well pose a problem with the establishment of many models of worker ownership, along with similar problems like the purposed problem of minority non-representation of say the more skilled workers etc (although it is worth noting the current situation does I would argue a worse job of it), the tariffs and subsidies argument (again I would say there are worse parallels in neocapitalism)I don't know about that examples specifics, but remember there are many different possible ways for co-ops can be constructed, using a blend of things like representation, consensus and veto's, not all are the same construct(1). In general it could be said the argument generally is in large due to the advertisers and politics that control much of the media content, which require such structures to be demonized or marginalized(2), under the profit motive; In doing so it is much like an elephant and a mouse in a small room and the elephant complaining the mouse is taking up to much space; under capitalism the majority of all workers are non-people, without democratic influence, the creepy part to this is how much this is overlooked.It doesn't mean that there is not a solution to this problem, or indeed that the problem would even exist in the new model, as a co-op based economy would not have to compete in the same way as it does in the current solely profit orientated climate; in any case transitional methods would have to be introduced.Regulation would be the last and feasible option to your dilemma, or possibly a union/s exclusively for temps and freelance workers(3) in balance with the businesses. The perforable solution would be to end traditional wage labor eventually, having easy investment liquidity, transferability or a less profit driven method for investment would be a good step in what are supposed to be relatively free entry and exit opportunities(4).If all those characters didn't stuff you full then here's a few links:(1) http://www.redpepper.org.uk/Workers-of-the-world-co-operate/ (2) www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8oHl3ooeZo&list=FLRJp-uT-r9ca6DwkTdinnAA&index=37&feature=plpp_video(3) http://www1.cs.columbia.edu/~unger/articles/workerCo-Ops.html (4) http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=4-Vr4KKQd4sC&pg=PA204&lpg=PA204&dq=free+entry+and+exit+principle&source=bl&ots=A_ObiQ8R4G&sig=e4HshTNHwqg0hGzw-VcCrfaIQkY&hl=en&sa=X&ei=9ascT8rKHdOZ8gO9oa3KCw&ved=0CEkQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=free%20entry%20and%20exit%20principle&f=false PS My talents seem to reside in other places than the use of grammatical accuracy or restrain, hopefully it's in the content that it is made with.PPS Hmm, maybe have gone a bit to far from this threads sheep pen now, I'm new here so I don't really know this forums code of conduct yet beyond T&Cs.