Some disturbing news has surfaced on the Los Angeles Times today that surely confirms that Hillary Clinton and her supporters belong in a dictatorship. An article dated May 9, 2016, seems to point to a disturbing new trend within the Clinton Campaign, one that jeopardizes free speech itself.

According to the article, when “Hillary Hecklers” online express their opinions about her in chatrooms or on Facebook, they may now find themselves face to face with Clinton’s “multimillion dollar Super PAC.” This is bad news for any American who happens to not buy into Clinton’s rhetoric and positions.

The article states that Clinton’s well connected and ultra wealthy campaign backers have “opened a new frontier in digital campaigning, one that seems to have been inspired by the internet’s worst instincts.”

This means that Crooked Hillary Clinton and her backers are launching an all out war on free speech in this country.

The Super PAC you would encounter, referred to as “Correct The Record” will be spending approximately 1 million dollars to locate and apprehend social media users who “post unflattering messages about the Democratic front-runner.”

What happened to free speech? Clinton is clearly trampling on the Constitution.

In the end, however, this campaign to seek out and arrest anyone who isn’t willing to buy into Hillary’s nonsense will actually “increase the amount of trolling that already exists online.”

How did this plan originate? Well, it seems that the Clinton Campaign first got the idea to do this when “Clinton operatives” suddenly found themselves in a specifically, Clinton supporters haven’t been as “engaged and aggressive online” as others have.

The fact that her supporters have not been “as engaged” online is in fact one of the most significant weak points of the Campaign, even compared with the supporters of her rival in the sam party as her, Bernie Sanders, when he ran for President.

Many “experts on digital campaigns” believe this idea- that of “launching a paid army of former bloggers, public affairs specialists and designers” to launch counterattacks online probably won’t work.

However, having to use a Super PAC to “create a counterweight to movements” that have appeared naturally also shows how poorly adapted the Clinton campaign is to using 21st century technology.

Ultimately, trying to engineer opposition to Clinton’s opponents rather letting it be generated naturally confirms that Clinton’s positions and platforms are not “populist” but rather ” paid and brought by lifetime political operatives and high level consultants.”

What do you think of the Clinton’s campaign’s attempt to silence her opposition and free speech? Please share this article and comment below.