Recent editorials of statewide and national interest from Ohio newspapers:

Flu is serious business; get your shot

The Marietta Times

Sept. 30

What is the most serious respiratory illness threat facing Americans today? If you answered “e-cigarettes” or “vaping,” we commend you for keeping up with current events.

But that is the wrong answer. The correct one is influenza.

During the 2017-18 season, nearly 15 percent of Americans contracted influenza, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and approximately 79,400 people died of the illness. Though most of those deaths were older individuals, children are also at risk. In the 2017-18 season, 183 of the reported flu deaths were children.

There is no way to guarantee you will not get the flu - but there is a safeguard that will reduce the likelihood of that dramatically or give you a better chance of fighting it off. It is getting an annual flu shot.

With colder weather and the flu season just around the corner, many health care outlets already have the flu vaccine.

Most health insurance companies cover flu shots. They can be obtained from doctors’ offices, hospitals, many pharmacies and at many health departments - which often can make provisions for those not covered by insurance.

Consider this: You may think you can get through a bout with the flu just fine - but what if you transmit it to someone more at risk? Think about getting the shot, and soon.

Online: https://bit.ly/2nYyqZu

___

U.S. Senate to vets: Drop dead

The Sandusky Register

Sept. 24

Sen. Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., takes questions during his town hall meeting at Kennesaw State University on Aug. 14, 2017, in Kennesaw, Ga.

There are times, we believe, when the truth sits in plain view but we cannot see it, and fallacies of patriotism are accepted and not questioned. Veterans suffering from life-threatening and terminal illnesses caused by exposure to toxic smoke from burn pits maintained by the U.S. military should get fair and compassionate care and comfort from the nation they served.

We all agree to that. Or do we?

We hear the refrain so often, with a flag waving in the background, “Thank a veteran. Thank a veteran.” We hear it from celebrities and politicians, to car dealers, from neighbors and friends. “Thank a veteran.”

It’s just not true to our actions.

For nearly two decades we sent members of our all-volunteer army into harm’s way, in wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, with the promise their nation would stand behind them, now and forever. They served with dignity, with honor, even though, in hindsight, our involvement in those wars, and how we became involved, were questionable at the start, and are still questionable to this day.

There was no WMD, the cause pushed for entering the Iraq War 18 years ago. And, most Americans do not understand why went in, and why we are still on the ground in Afghanistan, an obvious failure in U.S. leadership to provide coherent explanations for our involvement, for two decades.

The very use of football field-sized burn pits to burn waste of all kinds around the clock is a statement against the interest of the soldiers who served at nearby bases and were forced to breath that smoke at work and in the barracks, 24/7. The evidence it was dangerous was known when the match was lit; it’s always been known. The failure to attend to the needs of these returning veterans, many of whom have died from diseases caused by exposure to the never ending streams of toxic smoke from more than 250 burn pits maintained by the U.S. military near combat bases in Iraq and Afghanistan is another declaration against the belief that we care as a nation for our veterans after they return from service.

The failure of the U.S. military, the Veterans Administration, the president and Congress to address the dire medical needs of this growing group of veterans is a statement to them and to their families: Go away and die.

For several years now, U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, has lobbied fellow members of the Senate Veterans Affairs’ Committee to hold hearings about burn pit illnesses and allow veterans and their families to testify. We appreciate the Ohio senator’s advocacy on their behalf, and his promise to tell their stories and submit written testimonies from them to the committee.

But U.S. Sen. Johnny Isakson’s decided to exclude veterans from testifying, and, in our view that’s his way of telling them to “drop dead.” As chairman of the Senate committee, Isakson, R-Georgia, has the power to let them testify, and the power to deny their voices from being heard. Isakson, who has delayed these hearing for years, has had plenty of time to formulate an explanation for barring veterans, but he’s refused to address the question.

Many of the veterans suffering illnesses from exposure believe the military and the VA want to avoid tracking, categorizing or properly treating their illnesses due to the huge financial liability it would create to render such services. Some believe the military and the VA can “wait them out,” meaning let them die with that financial liability dying with them.

Some times the truth sits in plain sight, right behind or next to false platitudes of respect and gratitude. With Isakson’s decision to bar veterans from next week’s hearing, this would seem to be one of those times.

Online: https://bit.ly/2nXv1u0

___

Any Clinic, Mercy deal must go beyond ‘care’

The Canton Repository

Sept. 29

“Every life deserves world-class care.”

If you’ve watched broadcasts from a Cleveland television station or listened to local radio, you’ve probably heard that slogan in an advertisement.

It is, of course, the mantra of Cleveland Clinic.

And why not?

Year in and year out, “The Clinic” has been rated among the world’s best hospitals overall and in numerous specialties. In the recently released U.S. News & World Report’s “2019-20 Best Hospitals,” it was named a top U.S. hospital and earned the highest ranking in Ohio. It’s heart program has been ranked No. 1 in the nation since 1995, and five specialties are ranked in the top five this year.

Perhaps soon Cleveland Clinic will establish a presence in Stark County, something it has desired for some time. Information discussed Friday, as the Clinic and the Sisters of Charity Health System announced a letter of intent to explore Mercy Medical Center joining the Clinic family, indicated talks started roughly two years ago.

A location in Canton would fill a coverage gap between Clinic-affiliated facilities in Summit County - Akron General Medical Center, including a Health and Wellness Center in Green among the sites - and Union Hospital in Dover, where the Clinic became a partner about 18 months ago.

It has been apparent for some time Mercy needs a partner to keep pace in the ever-changing and competitive business of health care delivery. Only two miles away, Aultman Hospital has been strengthening its position in the field, with acquisitions and partnerships to keep itself not only viable but also a leader and innovator in several areas.

Assuming the Clinic and Sisters of Charity can work out details of maintaining the medical center’s Catholic identity and other finer points of a complex agreement, more “world-class care” will be available to patients in our area.

While that can bring great benefits to potential patients, we hope it doesn’t come at the cost of losing a world-class neighbor, a world-class employer and a world-class contributor to the entire community.

Because that is what Mercy Medical Center and its predecessors have been in Canton for well over 100 years: world-class partners.

Almost exactly 111 years ago, the Sisters of Charity of St. Augustine opened the doors to Mercy Hospital in downtown Canton. Only five months earlier, Rose Klorer had purchased the home of former President William McKinley on Market Avenue N. Over the next several years, the hospital grew and added care units, including a pediatric unit and later the first psychiatric unit in Ohio.

In 1950, The Timken Foundation of Canton gave Mercy more than 30 acres of land where the medical center still sits, several expansions and name changes later, at its convenient location along Interstate 77. While the Timken name hasn’t been associated with the hospital in a formal way for nearly a quarter-century, many in the community still remember it that way and can recall the family values and faith-based care patients could count on - and still can - at Mercy.

That’s what we can’t lose.

Cleveland Clinic says its six “fundamental values” are quality, innovation, teamwork, service, integrity and compassion. We’ve certainly seen the Sisters of Charity carrying out those same values in our community for decades, so perhaps the two cultures will prove to be a world-class fit.

Online: https://bit.ly/2nUF96S

___

Trump administration’s food-stamp end run around Congress must not stand

The Cleveland Plain Dealer

Sept. 29

Ohio’s congressional delegation must fight the unjustifiable Trump administration plan to kick millions of Americans — including tens of thousands of Ohioans — off the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), otherwise known as food stamps.

Besides the human costs, the administration’s proposal clearly breaches congressional intent.

If President Donald Trump does succeed, his administration plan would deny food stamp benefits to an estimated 61,081 Ohio households, about 8 percent of the Ohio households now enrolled in the program. According to the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services, about 43 percent of Ohio’s food stamp beneficiaries are children. Kicking kids off food stamps would be a travesty that amounts to disinvesting in Ohio’s future.

The Trump plan’s bite would be even bigger nationally, according to Mathematica, a research firm that analyzed SNAP data. Of the 21.5 million American households that now benefit from SNAP, Mathematica estimated that the plan would cut about 1.9 million households from SNAP’s rolls.

At issue, to Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue, is a procedure Ohio and most other states use to screen food stamp applicants - Broad-Based Categorical Eligibility (BBCE). The Trump administration claims BBCE can let people qualify for food stamps even when assets or income should disqualify them.

The nonpartisan Congressional Research Service, an arm of Congress, reports that states have been allowed to use categorical eligibility since the 1996 welfare reform. Categorical eligibility considers an applicant’s receipt of a “service” (not necessarily a payment) from other welfare programs.

A fact sheet on Perdue’s plan, distributed by the Agriculture Department, doesn’t say how many SNAP clients shouldn’t be receiving benefits. But the fact sheet makes this telling observation: “(The) law” - note that word - “(authorizing SNAP) allows states to confer ‘categorical eligibility’ on those who have already been certified for similar means-tested programs - that is programs that check income, assets, and other circumstances, to ensure applicants are eligible - such as Temporary Assistant for Needy Families.”

The problem, the Agriculture Department claims, is that “some (unnamed) states” stretch eligibility, so even if SNAP applicants haven’t been means-tested by other welfare programs, they can be deemed to participate in those programs just by receiving a brochure on them.

Where does this happen? The department doesn’t say. How often does this happen? The department doesn’t say.

Congress passed the underlying law — note, it’s a law, not an administrative rule — in part to streamline cumbersome, costly and often duplicative means-testing for different federal programs. Advocates for Ohio’s approach, for instance, say this state’s use of the flexibility the law allows to waive asset tests — besides acknowledging that poor people may need small nest eggs in case of emergencies — has actually saved taxpayers money, not the other way around.

Maybe the Agriculture Department doesn’t like this law. But a federal agency can’t repeal laws. Only Congress can. And twice in the last five years, Congress has specifically refused to crimp or abolish “categorical eligibility” for food stamps.

The House-passed version of the 2014 farm bill would have ended broad-based categorical eligibility. But the House-Senate conference committee that reconciled the bill’s versions deleted the provision.

The House-passed version of the 2018 farm bill would have limited (but not ended) BBCE. The House-Senate conference committee that reconciled the bill’s versions deleted the provision. And Donald Trump signed the bill into law last Dec. 20.

One of the Trump administration’s purported aims is to reduce “the administrative state,” that is, government by unelected, rule-writing bureaucrats. Yet the administrative state is precisely what Perdue’s proposal exemplifies - trying to do, bureaucratically, what an elected Congress refuses to do.

In human terms, the proposed rule would cause cruel and unmerited damage to low-income families and lead more children to go to bed hungry. But in political terms, this attempted administrative end-run around congressional intent is brazen hypocrisy.

Ohio’s congressional delegation needs to defend its prerogatives, as well as its constituents, and demand that the administration withdraw this flawed attempt to undo lawmaking through which Congress has clearly, and repeatedly, expressed its intent.

Online: https://bit.ly/2mlxYnX

Sign up for Daily Newsletters Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2020 The Washington Times, LLC.