Skip to comments.

PROOF Democrats Paid for RUSSIAN HACKING, Big Conspiracy to Impeach Trump

Posted on by HomerBohn

Democratic leaders like Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi are responsible for the huge lies that Russia hacked into the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and our election. There is no evidence that anything happened between Donald Trumps campaign and the Russians. Now, weve uncovered that the Democrats secretly paid for the Russian hacking lies to be sold to the American people. This is going to blow your mind.

To understand all the hoopla behind the Russian conspiracy, we have to start at the beginning. The Russian story started with the Democratic National Committee (DNC) reporting that they had been hacked during their convention last year. From that hacking, we found out Bernie Sanders had been thrown under the bus by the DNC in favor of Hillary Clinton. But, who really hacked the DNC? It wasnt Russia; it was a hacker calling himself Guccifer 2.0.

Politico, a left-wing source, reported back in September that it was Guccifer 2.0 that hacked the DNC. The hacker persona Guccifer 2.0 has released a new trove of documents that allegedly reveal more information about the Democratic National Committees finances and personal information on Democratic donors, as well as details about the DNCs network infrastructure, the source said.

So, where did the Russian hacking story come from? The answer should piss you off. It originated from a private security company called Crowdstrike, and that company was paid over $267,000 dollars by the Democratic National Committee. But, heres the real kicker: its Crowdstrike that says Guccifer 2.0 is a Russian Government spy, and that is laughable!

Heres why: Justice.gov says, Marcel Lehel Lazar, 44, of Arad, Romania, a hacker who used the online moniker Guccifer, was sentenced today to 52 months in prison for unauthorized access to a protected computer and aggravated identity theft. So, Guccifer is a Romanian, and there is absolutely no evidence that he was working for Russia. If that was true, dont you think, when he was sentenced to 52 years in prison, that would have come out?

Marcel Lehel Lazar, 44, of Arad, Romania, is Guccifer 2.0. Sentenced to 52 years for hacking, there was no evidence he was working for Russia.

Not the FBI, CIA, Department of Justice, or any American intelligence agency ever proved Russia hacked anything. All of this crap about Russia is coming from a report from this private security firm Crowdstrike which was contracted by Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats.

In fact, the mind blowing part of this whole fake conspiracy is that the FBI and DHS give zero forensic proof of any hacking. Instead, they say they are relying on Crowdstrike. Lets go over that again in case its not sinking in  the FBI and DHS report nothing except that this private security firm Crowdstrike, paid by the DNC, says this hacker Guccifer 2.0 is a big bad Russian.

The Hill reported on the FBI and DHS joint report on the alleged hacking, saying, But security experts say that the document [FBI and DHS joint report] provides little in the way of forensic proof to confirm the governments attribution. Private security firms  like CrowdStrike, who investigated the DNC breach  went much further, they [FBI, DHS] say.

Breitbarts Lee Stranahan confirms that it was Crowdstrike and the Democrats who made up the Russian hacking story.

Heres what Crowdstrike says, CrowdStrike stands fully by its analysis and findings identifying two separate Russian intelligence-affiliated adversaries present in the DNC network in May 2016. On June 15, 2016, a blog post to a WordPress site authored by an individual using the moniker Guccifer 2.0 claimed credit for breaching the Democratic National Committee. This blog post presents documents alleged to have originated from the DNC.

So, Guccifer 2.0 is Russian intelligence? Did he work for Vladimir Putin, too? This is all a fake conspiracy that the Democrats paid Crowdstrike to find. This false narrative was concocted with one endgame, and that is to take out President Donald Trump. The Democrats are using the paranoia around the fake Russian hacking story to make anyone who spoke to a Russian diplomat seem nefarious.

Its a pack of lies, and now that you know the truth, we must spread it far and wide. Dont let these scumbags in the Democratic Party do any more damage. We all know the mainstream media will never report these facts, so its up to us patriotic Americans to make sure the liars go down in flames and are exposed as traitors to everything they vowed to uphold.



TOPICS:

Crime/Corruption

Foreign Affairs

News/Current Events

Politics/Elections

KEYWORDS:

clintonrico

dncrico

evilobama

jaildemocrats

obamarico

subornationofperjury

Since Democrats spread terror try them, convict them and ship them off to the prison at Guantanamo.



To: HomerBohn

Trump just tweeted this but I can’t really understand what he’s trying to say....can the DNC do that? “Is it true the DNC would not allow the FBI access to check server or other equipment after learning it was hacked? Can that be possible?”



To: HomerBohn

BTTT



To: HomerBohn

Crowdstrike is google owned. Google were major supporters of Hillary and Obama. The FBI was denied access to the DNC servers. RNC allowed them to inspect. Granting them access = waiver of any warrant requirement. DNC likely concerned an insider like Seth Rich would have been found to be the leak with proper forensics being done or other criminality exposed.



To: HomerBohn

Bad mistake.

Marcel Lazar is Guccifer.

Who is Guccifer 2.0 is still not known.



by 5 posted onby ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)

To: HomerBohn

Some would find it most odd that the commies in our own government and on our streets are fanning the flames of the Red Scare. Remember how the old media reacted to the real threat of the Red Scare in the 50s and 60s? McCarthy was vilified for exposing the truth.



by 6 posted onby Neoliberalnot (Marxism works well only with the uneducated and the unarmed)

To: lilypad

Is it true the DNC would not allow the FBI access to check server or other equipment after learning it was hacked? Can that be possible? The one and only reason Democrat president Obama would have for wire-tapping a

Repub presidential candidate is to feed any useful intel to Hillary's campaign. Read on. =============================================== THIS WE KNOW AS FACT: The Pittsburgh FBI field office (Cyber-security Unit) is investigating to identify those behind breaches of the DNC's computer systems. The trail leads to a family of Muslim IT staffers who worked exclusively for Democrats on Capitol Hill. The FBI is looking at Muslim Brothers Imran, Abid, and Jamal, Imram's wife Hina Alvi,

and several others in the Capitol Hill gang doing IT exclusively for Democrats. The computer-savvy Muslim brothers (Imran here) seemed to be friendly w/ the Clintons.

It's very odd to see a lowly Capitol Hill staffer get that close to a bigshot Clinton. Did the brothers share Democrats' Capitol Hill intel w/ the Clintons? Did the Clintons need data coming into the DNC computers? =================================== The Awan criminal Muslim gang collected $5 million tax dollars from congressional offices for IT services. Trickling in is compelling evidence that they overbilled the Democrats, stole US govt property and funneled intel to an outside computer. The number of Democrats who employed these criminals could number as high as 80 Democrat members. Did any of these Democrats publicly express concern for taxpayers being bilked and/or for US citizens' safety and security? Did any Democrats file police reports? <><> for stolen govt property?

<><> falsified official govt documents?

<><> falsified payment vouchers? I didn't think so. ================================================ Let's just help out and report it for them (smirk) FBI TIP PAGE---https://tips.fbi.gov Contact President Trump's web site. www.greatagain.gov/ =========================================== CALL CONGRESS---http://www.contactingthecongress.org/ DEMAND CONGRESS MOBILIZE THESE AGENCIES AT ONCE: <><> FBI -- Wire Fraud Division <><> IRS-Fraud Unit <><> Department of Justices Office of the Inspector General, <><> Department of Commerces Office of Inspector General. <><> DOJ's Criminal Division-- Public Integrity Section



by 7 posted onby Liz (DNC Chair Perez's new Democrat slogan: Join us, or we'll sue Trump.)

To: All

ITEM---Americans demand to see the campaign contributions to the eight members of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence that employed the Awan cabal....and other Democrats who had contact w/ the Awans. =============================================== ITEM---Eight other Democrat members issued a letter to then DNC-Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz. The Democrat Congressmen demanded that their staffers be granted access to top secret classified information. The signatories to the letter were Democrat Congressmen (a) Andre Carson, (b) Luis Guiterez, (c) Jim Himes, (d) Terri Sewell, (e) Jackie Speier, (f) Mike Quigley, (g) Eric Swalwell, and, (h) Patrick Murphy. Some of the named Democrats had a history of attempting to undermine national security. Two Democrats have been linked to an emerging security breach. The office of Andre Carson, the second Muslim in Congress, employed ITer Imran Awan. As did the offices of Jackie Speier and Cong Debbie Wasserman Schultz (then DNC Chair). The Democrats letter demanding intel access had been addressed to then-DNC Chair Cong Debbie Wasserman Schultz.



by 8 posted onby Liz (DNC Chair Perez's new Democrat slogan: Join us, or we'll sue Trump.)

To: HomerBohn

The democrats are playing fast and loose with Russia. The damage the are doing to the internal structure of the U.S is incredible. While they [the Dems and several GOP senators] try and destroy not only are the inflicting deep wounds in U.S psyche and fueling the schism, they are emboldening insurrection and sedition behavior and providing years of workable tools for Russia to keep destabilizing our culture of freedom.



To: HomerBohn

This article still misses the point! Russians did not “hack” the election because it was impossible to do so. No votes were changed or counted incorrectly. Despite the non stop media attempts to get rid of trump, he still won the election. if anything was “hacked,” it was the DNC, but how easy did they make it to be hacked anyway? Using “password” as your password is stupidity! Falling for a phishing scheme is stupid! The most they can say is that the Russians tried to influence or mess with the election. But what did Obama do with Israel when he spent millions in taxpayer monies ? and Brexit when he said the Brits would have to go back of the end of the line ? Words have meaning. The media and Dems use the term “hacking” the election instead of “influence” because it sounds worse. But republicans should keep saying the truth... They might have hacked the DNC because of the DNC inability to protect its information, but they did not hack an election ... Don’t let them get away with the propaganda



To: ScaniaBoy

Interesting take on Guccifer 2.0 I find Tracy D seems to be very sharp chasing down these rabbit holes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5oAP6aumHg Any opinions?



To: ScaniaBoy

Yes, this is sloppy work. They may end up being right, but it is for the wrong reasons. Two different hackers. Hopefully Trump didn't tweet this as they mentioned in the article.



To: HomerBohn

And Crowdstrike is a business that operates under the Google umbrella of companies.



To: HomerBohn

Guccifer Guccifer2.0 The time line of Guccifer's arrest shows that he couldn't possibly be Guccifer 2.0. Very interesting statement in the Wiki piece on Guccifer 2.0: "The US Intelligence Community concluded that some of the genuine leaks that Guccifer 2.0 has said were part of a series of cyberattacks on the DNC were committed by two Russian intelligence groups. This conclusion is based on anayses conducted by various private sector cybersecurity individuals and firms including Crowdstrike, Fidelis Cybersecurity, etc."

NOT FBI, NOT NSA. Strange that no official US agencies are involved in such a high profile cybersecurity breach.



by 14 posted onby ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)

To: HomerBohn

“Heres why: Justice.gov says, Marcel Lehel Lazar, 44, of Arad, Romania, a hacker who used the online moniker Guccifer, was sentenced today to 52 months in prison for unauthorized access to a protected computer and aggravated identity theft. So, Guccifer is a Romanian, and there is absolutely no evidence that he was working for Russia. If that was true, dont you think, when he was sentenced to 52 years in prison, that would have come out?” Years, months, what’s the difference.



by 15 posted onby Beagle8U (Long live Yoga Pants! ( and boycott 84 lumber. Let's bankrupt the bastards!))

To: Cboldt

That would mean that Google might be involved in sedition?



To: TigerClaws

Yeah, Crowdstrike is indeed a suspicious company. From wikipedia—note its multiple senior FBI executives on its board: “In late 2011, along with entrepreneur George Kurtz[4][5] and Gregg Marston, Dmitri Alperovitch co-founded and became the chief technology officer of CrowdStrike,[6] a security technology company focused on helping enterprises and governments protect their intellectual property and secrets against cyberespionage and cybercrime. CrowdStrike has brought on board senior FBI executives, such as Shawn Henry, former executive assistant director (EAD) of the FBI’s Criminal, Cyber, Response and Services Branch, and Steve Chabinsky, former deputy assistant director of the FBI’s Cyber Division. CrowdStrike has received $156 million in funding from Warburg Pincus, Accel Partners, and Google Capital.”



To: HomerBohn

He was sentenced to 52 months, not years. You would think this person could at least get his facts right.



To: HomerBohn

The Hill reported on the FBI and DHS joint report on the alleged hacking, saying, But security experts say that the document [FBI and DHS joint report] provides little in the way of forensic proof to confirm the governments attribution. Private security firms  like CrowdStrike, who investigated the DNC breach  went much further, they [FBI, DHS] say. Just coming to this conclusion now?? I disassembled that "security report" here on FR months ago proving it was nothing more than a copy and paste job, a "Security 101" for Dummies report which cited zero proof of any of the allegations made. Sheesh, I should've bookmarked it.



by 19 posted onby usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))

To: Major Matt Mason

I could not find this tweet under Trumps twitter account.



by 20 posted onby dontreadthis (I finally came up with this tagline)

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

FreeRepublic , LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794

FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson