Photo credit: The Goldwater

Today we've learned that former President Barack Obama may have been in contact with Mark Zuckerberg giving advice about the news that would be or would not be allowed on the Facebook platform.

If the stories being reported are correct, and they're coming from globalist propaganda outlets that promote Democratic agendas such as the Washington Post, then it certainly appears as if the former President of the United States of America involved himself or attempted to involve himself in how a privately owned and publicly traded corporation like Facebook conducted its business mantra.

The Washington first reported that <a href="http://archive.is/CJbWn"> <i>”Obama tried to give Zuckerberg a wake-up call over fake news on Facebook”</i></a>, which suggests that not only was Barack Obama incredibly close with Mark Zuckerberg, which most of us have long since believed anyway, but that Obama may have attempted to use his authority and position to pressure Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook to censor news that was damaging to the Democratic Party.

Whether or not Washington Post realizes it, that's exactly what they've just admitted to having knowledge of. This is an excerpt:

<blockquote>after Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg dismissed as “crazy” the idea that fake news on his company’s social network played a key role in the U.S. election, President Barack Obama pulled the youthful tech billionaire aside and delivered what he hoped would be a wake-up call.</i>

<i>For months leading up to the vote, Obama and his top aides quietly agonized over how to respond to Russia’s brazen intervention on behalf of the Donald Trump campaign without making matters worse. Weeks after Trump’s surprise victory, some of Obama’s aides looked back with regret and wished they had done more.</i>

This is an amazing revelation on so many levels. What this implies is likely criminal misconduct once again on behalf of the Obama Administration and Facebook via Mark Zuckerberg.

How ironic is this? Facebook just continues to dig themselves into a hole.

A few days ago The Goldwater reported on the case of Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook agreeing to give the government records of advertising purchases that it claims was bought by Russians.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Since Mark Zuckerberg Sold Ads to Russia to Influence US Election, Doesn't That Make Him A Criminal?<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/RedPill?src=hash">#RedPill</a><a href="https://t.co/nVpj3jyLyn">https://t.co/nVpj3jyLyn</a></p>— Red Pill (@IWillRedPillYou) <a href="https://twitter.com/IWillRedPillYou/status/911127078325637120">September 22, 2017</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

As I said already before, <a href="http://thegoldwater.com/news/8469-Since-Mark-Zuckerberg-Sold-Ads-to-Russia-to-Influence-US-Election-Doesn-t-That-Make-Him-A-Criminal"><i>Since Mark Zuckerberg Sold Ads to Russia to Influence US Election, Doesn't That Make Him A Criminal?”</i></a>

If in fact the Russian Government or entities from Russia did purchase these advertisements with the intent of interfering in the United States of America's Democratic Electoral Process, and Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook agreed to sell the advertisements to a foreign government, in return for cash, didn't Facebook knowingly aid and abet the enemy?

Isn't that treason? Now we're also being told that Mark Zuckerberg was “given guidance” by Barack Obama on what types of news to censor or allow? How is that not interfering in the election? How did Facebook not hack the election?

On an ethical level, sure we don't expect much in the way of morals or values <a href="https://thegoldwater.com/news/8620-Facebook-Allows-Pedophile-to-Operate-Child-Porn-Ring-for-YEARS-before-Busted">from Facebook after they've been caught repeatedly hosting child pornography and allowing pedophiles to traffic illegal content on their platform,</a> but at the same time, Facebook has an outreach of well over a billion unique users.

Where does the line become drawn that such a powerful platform can censor speech and content related to an election of a President of the United States of America in order to benefit one party over another?

Shouldn't the Federal Elections Commission be performing an investigation into this clearly impartial gross negligence and potential foreign aid to interfere in the 2016 elections?

The mainstream media, of course, is going to drop the ball on this, if not sweep it under the rug by ignoring this aspect altogether.

I implore each and every American Voter from all parties who want a free and open election to contact the FEC themselves and file a complaint and demand justice.

The same tactics could have been used in primaries, to benefit Hillary Clinton for example, because as we've all noticed she had the most unfair advantage over her opposition in the press.

You can give the FEC a call toll-free at 1-800-424-9530 between the hours of 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. Eastern Time.

You can send the FEC an email by emailing [email protected] and demanding an inquiry.

Or you can visit their site at https://www.fec.gov/contact-us/ for more information.

As a Democracy, we have to stand up for freedom, liberty, and justice for all.

—<i>[email protected]</i>

<i>On Twitter:</i>

<a href="https://www.twitter.com/IWillRedPillYou">@IWillRedPillYou</a>

Tips? Info? Send me a message!