If you don’t think that George Soros’ entire weltanschauung harkens back to messianic politics and subversive movements, if you believe that USA Today is right when it states that Soros is just a person who is committed to spreading human rights “around the world,”[1] then George Soros himself would radically disagree with you.

Soros would almost certainly ask you to pick up a copy of his book The Alchemy of Finance, in which you would read things like this:

“It will come as no surprise to the reader when I admit that I have always harbored an exaggerated view of my self-importance—to put it bluntly, I fancied myself as some kind of god or an economic reformer like Keynes or, even better, a scientist like Einstein.

“My sense of reality was strong enough to make me realize that these expectations were excessive and I kept them hidden as a guilty secret…As I made my way in the world, reality came close enough to my fantasy to allow me to admit my secret, at least to myself…I have been fortunate enough to be able to act out some of my fantasies…”[2]

Soros moves on to say that writing things like that “exposes me in a way I never dared to expose myself before, but I feel I can afford it: my success in business protects me.”[3] Soros then dropped the political bomb, which obviously has become the principle of his political substratum ever since he began to use his economic power to manipulate nations and destroy economic progress:

“If truth be known, I carried some rather potent messianic fantasies with me from childhood, which I felt I had to control, otherwise they might get me in trouble.”[4]

When asked about this very issue, Soros responded, “It is a sort of disease when you consider yourself some kind of god, the creator of everything, but I feel comfortable about it now since I began to live it out.”[5]

Soros risibly told Robert Slater, who wrote an unauthorized biography of Soros, that his “potent messianic fantasies” has nothing to do with subversive movements but had everything to do with helping humanity.[6]

Complete balderdash.

What about funding violent movements such as Black Lives Matter? Does Soros mean to tell us that he is helping humanity by doing so? Even USA Today, a largely Zionist outlet, did not hesitate to report last July that “According to 2014 FBI data, 90% of African-American homicides were committed by African Americans.”[7]

Let’s just hypothetically grant the premise that the 10% were killed by “racist” cops. Do BLM thugs and gangsters and Soros mean to tell us that the 10% are more important than the 90%? What kind of rationale is this? As E. Michael Jones said in our conversation last February:

“In 2014 there were 432 homicides in the city of Chicago. During the week beginning October 18, 2015, four people were shot and killed in the city of Chicago and 34 people were shot and wounded. During the month of October 2015, as of October 24, 21 people have been shot and killed and 136 people have been shot and wounded…

“If ‘black lives matter,’ why aren’t we talking about these murders? The answer to that question is very simple. It’s because George Soros isn’t paying anyone to talk about them, and even if some other rich Jew were to come up with the money, the Jewish controlled media wouldn’t run the story because they would prefer that we remain in ignorance of the Black/Jewish alliance.

“George Soros is to Ferguson what the Spingarn brothers were to the NAACP, what the Communist Party was to the Scottsboro Boys, what Stanley Levinson was to Martin Luther King and what Burt Schneider and David Horowitz were to the Black Panthers. He is one more rich Jew who is trying to turn a local incident into a slave rebellion by turning Blacks into Jewish revolutionaries.”

Soros obviously knows what he is doing. He told Robert Slater that he is “fascinated by chaos. That’s how I make my money: understanding the revolutionary process in financial markets.”[8] Like Daniel Pipes who has articulated a worldview that is quite consistent with Jewish subversive movements in Syria, Soros is killing two birds with one stone in America through Black Lives Matter.

Soros once called the former Soviet Union the “Soros Empire.”[9] As we have seen in the past, he helped destroy the Russian economy in the 1990s. By 1994, Soros was pouring millions upon millions of dollars in the Russian education system,[10] obviously to brainwash young people and teachers.

One of the goals was to “retain teachers and write new textbooks.”[11] Those textbooks would have obviously hailed Soros as the new Caesar and the savior of the Russian economy. Russia, under Vladimir Putin, kicked Soros out of their territory because it was obvious to all that he was covertly destroying the nation.

Soros again tells us something about himself that probably would surprise many of his supporters and apologists. He said back in 1994:

“I am sort of a deus ex machina. I am something unnatural. I’m very comfortable with my public persona because it is one I have created for myself. It represents what I like to be as distinct from what I really am. You know, in my personal capacity I’m not actually a selfless philanthropic person. I’ve very much self-centered.”[12]

Soros continued: “I do not accept the rules imposed by others…. And in periods of regime change, the normal rules don’t apply.”[13]

There you have it. Since “normal rules don’t apply,” then Soros has to attempt to rig the system at will. And he did. The economic and political system was rigged in Yugoslavia, Russia, and Soros tried to do the same thing in America and even in Asia.

Soros thinks he can wave his political hands and expect magical things to happen. He wants to be a god, therefore he has to do miracles–fantastic miracles–miracles that would dazzle his audience for hours. Through rapacious usury, Soros has been able to do magic. That’s why he titles his book The Alchemy of Finance.

Finance, according to Soros, does not come from true labor but from cheating the system. It comes from living in an “amoral” universe and bludgeon everyone else to economic death. And this is one reason why my dear friend and colleague Mark Dankof is seeing Soros’ magical hands behind Jill Stein’s new movement.

“A fundraiser launched by the Stein campaign to finance the costs of the recount bid had returned over $5 million as of Friday, higher than the money Stein took in terms of donations during the campaign run.

“‘The fact of the matter is this entire thing smells,’ Dankof said. ‘It is very clear that when Jill Stein can suddenly raise this kind of money, then there is someone other than her Green Party grassroots supporters that is behind this effort.

“It is quite clear that Jill Stein, in my view, is a player, a major player, for a hidden cabal that continues to manipulate results that it cannot deal with in terms of the way that the election actually went. This is also an attempt on the part of the Soros and company in my judgment to provide a further legitimization of a mainstream media.’”

Stein is obviously making a fool of herself, and even the Obama administration is now thinking that she is engaging in a weird activity. “We stand behind our election results,” says the administration, “which accurately reflect the will of the American people.”

But if you think Dankof’s view is a little far-fetched, then keep in mind that Soros is willing to support any movement or group that essentially pledges allegiance to his political weltanschauung. Remember that Sarah Palin’s Republican lobbyist Randy Scheunemann was on Soros’ payroll. Remember Soros gave Scheunemann $150,000 for “lobbying work”?[14]

So, whenever Soros writes about “humanitarian crisis” or “human rights” or even “democracy” or “freedom,”[15] he is using the media to cover his subversive and essentially diabolical tracts, which even the Daily Mail itself has found surprising.[16] It is well-known by now that Soros is the billionaire “who broke the Bank of England”[17] in 1992.

Because he is living in an incoherent world, because he is against the moral and political order—which is the essence of being satanic—Soros believes that he can posit contradictory statements at the same time and in the same respect, and to Soros, those contradictory statements are all true.

Soros told one interviewer that he is engaging in “amoral” activities and at the same time he tries to be moral. “I don’t feel guilty,” he says, “because I’m engaged in an amoral activity, which is not meant to have anything to do with guilt.”

Now we can understand why Soros was more than welcome to translate Saul Alinsky’s Rule for Radicals in other languages. In that book, Alinsky praises Lucifer as the first rebel. Alinsky meant it when he said:

“Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins—or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom—Lucifer.”

Certainly decent people are revolting against this diabolical system. As E. Michael Jones asked last February, do we really need another George Soros or subversive movement in order to create chaos in the world?

The answer is a resounding no.

What we need is Logos, the essence and creator of the rational universe. It was Logos who created you and me, and we can only be rational people by responding to our destiny, which is following or pursuing the truth and embracing it.

Failing to do so will inevitably drag us into the world of George Soros and subversive movements. We certainly cannot afford to follow this essentially diabolical path any longer. Jones writes:

“Just as Cyrus, King of Persia, set captive Israel free without a Jewish Revolution, so the three Persians whom we call the Magi showed us that Logos, not revolution, is the source of our liberation…

“Our model in this regard should be these three Persians, whom we call wise because they studied the logos that God has made apparent in the sky. The three Magi from the East were different than the decadent philosophers from the West, who, St. Paul tells us, have been schooled to ‘keep truth imprisoned in their wickedness.’”

Do we have the courage the follow the truth, regardless of where it leads? As Alexander Solzhenitsyn would have put it,

“Let each man choose: will he remain a witting servant of the lies, or has the time come for him to stand straight as an honest man, worthy of the respect of his children and contemporaries?”[18]

Truth, regardless of whether it seems awkward, uninteresting, or threatening, is humanity’s only defense against spiritual, moral, and intellectual insanity. May this be our attitude toward truth as we make our way through these tough times.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i0cU7AVR3gk

[1] Dawn Chmielewski, “Trump supporters target George Soros over protests,” USA Today, November 25, 2016.

[2] George Soros, The Alchemy of Finance (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1987 & 1994), 362-363.

[3] Ibid., 363.

[4] Quoted in Rachel Ehrenfeld and Shawn Macomber, “George Soros: The ‘God’ Who Carries Around Some Dangerous Demons,” LA Times, October 4, 2004.

[5] Rachel Ehrenfeld and Shawn Macomber, “George Soros: The ‘God’ Who Carries Around Some Dangerous Demons,” LA Times, October 4, 2004.

[6] Robert Slater, Soros: The Life, Times & Trading Secrets of the World’s Greatest Investor (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1997)), ix.

[7] Josh Hafner, “Why Black Lives Matter doesn’t focus on ‘black-on-black’ crime,” USA Today, July 27, 2016.

[8] Slater, Soros, 49.

[9] Rachel Ehrenfeld and Shawn Macomber, “George Soros: The ‘God’ Who Carries Around Some Dangerous Demons,” LA Times, October 4, 2004.

[10] Richard Boudreaux, “U.S. Billionaire Donates Millions to Russian Causes : Aid: George Soros has already sponsored scientists. Now he’s giving $250 million for teacher training and textbook writers,” LA Times, March 17, 1994.

[11] Ibid.

[12] Rachel Ehrenfeld and Shawn Macomber, “George Soros: The ‘God’ Who Carries Around Some Dangerous Demons,” LA Times, October 4, 2004.

[13] Ibid.

[14] Ben Smith, “Soros, anti-Communist,” Politico, November 12, 2010.

[15] See for example George Soros, “A New Policy to Rescue Ukraine,” NY Review of Books, February 5, 2015; Nolan D. McCaskill, “George Soros to Give $500 million to migrant, refugee businesses,” Politico, September 20, 2016; George Soros, “Putin is a bigger threat to Europe’s existence than ISIS,” Guardian, February 11, 2016.

[16] Karl West, “Man who broke the Bank of England, George Soros, ‘at centre of hedge funds plot to cash in on fall of the euro,’” Daily Mail, February 27, 2010.

[17] Szu Ping Chan, “George Soros, the billionaire ‘who broke the Bank of England’ opts for gold haven saying Brexit would spell end of EU,” Telegraph, June 16, 2016.

[18] Alexander Solzhenitsyn, The Solzhenitsyn Reader (Wilmington: ISI Books, 2006), 558.

Biography

Biography Jonas E. Alexis Jonas E. Alexis has degrees in mathematics and philosophy. He studied education at the graduate level. His main interests include U.S. foreign policy, history of Israel/Palestine conflict, and the history of ideas. He is the author of the new book Zionism vs. the West: How Talmudic Ideology is Undermining Western Culture. He is currently working on a book tentatively titled, Kevin MacDonald’s Abject Failure: A Philosophical and Moral Critique of Evolutionary Psychology, Sociobiology, and White Identity. He teaches mathematics in South Korea.