This post originally appeared at Robert Reich’s blog.

Dozens of big American corporations are considering leaving the United States in order to reduce their tax bills.

But they’ll be leaving the country only on paper. They’ll still do as much business in the US as they were doing before.

The only difference is they’ll no longer be “American,” and won’t have to pay US taxes on the profits they make.

Okay. But if they’re no longer American citizens, they should no longer be able to spend a penny influencing American politics.

Some background: We’ve been hearing for years from CEOs that American corporations are suffering under a larger tax burden than their foreign competitors. This is mostly rubbish.

It’s true that the official corporate tax rate of 39.1 percent, including state and local taxes, is the highest among members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

But the effective rate — what corporations actually pay after all deductions, tax credits and other maneuvers —± is far lower.

Last year, the Government Accountability Office examined corporate tax returns in detail and found that in 2010, profitable corporations headquartered in the United States paid an effective federal tax rate of 13 percent on their worldwide income, 17 percent including state and local taxes. Some pay no taxes at all.

One tax dodge often used by multi-national companies is to squirrel their earnings abroad in foreign subsidiaries located in countries where taxes are lower. The subsidiary merely charges the US parent inflated costs, and gets repaid in extra-fat profits.

Becoming a foreign company is the extreme form of this dodge. It’s a bigger accounting gimmick. The American company merges with a foreign competitor headquartered in another nation where taxes are lower, and reincorporates there.

This “expatriate” tax dodge (its official name is a “tax inversion”) is now at the early stages but is likely to spread rapidly because it pushes every American competitor to make the same move or suffer a competitive disadvantage.

For example, Walgreens, the largest drugstore chain in the United States with more than 8,700 drugstores spread across the nation, is on the verge of moving its corporate headquarters to Switzerland as part of a merger with Alliance Boots, the European drugstore chain.

Founded in Chicago in 1901, with current headquarters in the nearby suburb of Deerfield, Walgreens is about as American as apple pie — or your Main Street druggist.

Even if it becomes a Swiss corporation, Walgreens will remain your Main Street druggist. It just won’t pay nearly as much in US taxes.

Joseph E. Stiglitz Calls for Fair Taxes for All

Which means the rest of us will have to make up the difference. Walgreen’s morph into a Swiss corporation will cost you and me and every other American taxpayer about $4 billion over five years, according to an analysis by Americans for Tax Fairness.

The tax dodge likewise means more money for Walgreens’ investors and top executives. Which is why its large investors — including Goldman Sachs — have been pushing for it.

Some Walgreens’ customers have complained. A few activists have rallied outside the firm’s Chicago headquarters.

But hey, this is the way the global capitalist game played. Anything to boost the bottom line.

Yet it doesn’t have to be the way American democracy is played.

Even if there’s no way to stop US corporations from shedding their US identities and becoming foreign corporations, there’s no reason they should retain the privileges of US citizenship.

By treaty, the US government can’t (and shouldn’t) discriminate against foreign corporations offering as good if not better deals than American companies offer. So if Walgreens as a Swiss company continues to fill Medicaid and Medicare payments as well as, say, CVS, it’s likely that Walgreens will continue to earn almost a quarter of its $72 billion annual revenues directly from the US government.

But as a foreign corporation, Walgreens should no longer have any say over the size of those payments, what drugs they cover, or how they’re administered.

In fact, Walgreens should no longer have any say about how the US government does anything.

In 2010 it lobbied for and got a special provision in the Dodd-Frank Act, limiting the fees banks are allowed to charge merchants for credit-card transactions — resulting in a huge saving for Walgreens. If it becomes a Swiss citizen, the days of special provisions should be over.

The Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision may have opened the floodgates to American corporate money in US politics, but not to foreign corporate money in US politics.

The Court didn’t turn foreign corporations into American citizens, entitled to seek to influence US law and regulations.

Since the 2010 election cycle, Walgreens’ Political Action Committee has spent $991,030 on federal elections. If it becomes a Swiss corporation, it shouldn’t be able to spend a penny more.

Walgreens is free to become Swiss but it should no longer be free to influence US politics.

It may still be the Main Street druggist, but if it’s no longer American it shouldn’t be considered a citizen on Main Street.

—–

Watch Bill’s interview with Robert Reich about his documentary film, Inequality for All: