Sections Below:

Voter Party Registration Switching (NV, CA)

New Story Links

Voter Suppression Lawsuits (TX, NC, WI)

Ohio Election Integrity Lawsuit

Multiple CA Local Grand Jury Investigations

JAM PAC – National Class Action Lawsuit seeking redress for the fact that the Bernie Sanders Donors and Voters were defrauded by how the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz ran the Dem party primaries – now with OVER 1,000 class members and over 13,000 Voters asking to join the Class Action Lawsuit

CA 7-12-2016 SAN BERNARDINO Election Lawsuit

Election Justice Resource Links Section

Links in the Past Updates:

Action Item Links

Closing Thoughts

NEW SECTION Voter Party Registration Switching

NEVADA 6-13-2016 – LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL – Pahrump woman arrested for falsifying party affiliations on voter registrations – CARSON CITY — A Pahrump woman was arrested Wednesday on 11 felony charges involving allegations she falsified party affiliations while registering voters before the June 14 Nevada primary, the secretary of state’s office said. An arrest warrant issued for Tina Marie Parks listed bail at $50,000 cash or $100,000 bond. The arrest follows an investigation conducted by the state’s Election Integrity Task Force after it received complaints from voters who said Parks, while working for the conservative outreach group Engage Nevada, filled out their applications and listed the wrong party affiliation. CALIFORNIA

7-8-2016 The Press Enterprise – RIVERSIDE COUNTY: District attorney claims voters’ party affiliations purposely changed without consent – Registered Republicans as well as registered Democrats were victims of the switch, Hestrin said, adding that complaints came from party officials, candidates for office and regular voters.

NEW Story and group Links – SEVERAL HIGHLY RECOMMENDED TO WATCH

NEW SECTION Voter Suppression Lawsuits

NEW SECTION : Ohio Election Integrity Lawsuit Filed July 11, 2016

A lawsuit against Edison Media Research to release the raw data which shows such dramatic differences on exit polls and electronic vote totals in eleven states in the presidential primaries throughout the US. The file number and details of this lawsuit as transmitted to me are as follows: The following transaction was entered by Fitrakis, Robert on 7/11/2016 at 5:03 PM EDT and filed on 7/11/2016 Case Name: Johnson v. Edison Media Research, Inc Case Number: 2:16-cv-00670-EAS-TPK Filer: Peter M Johnson Document Number: 2 Docket Text: COMPLAINT with civil cover sheet against Edison Media Research, Inc, filed by Peter M Johnson. (Attachments: # (1) Civil Cover Sheet) (Fitrakis, Robert) The exit polls have been adjusted to fit electronic vote totals since 2004 when they appeared to show Kerry winning against Bush. Explanations were developed at that time to explain the differences between the exit polls and the vote totals which was that exit polls are generally unreliable. This assessment of exit poll reliability was developed by Karl Rove who was an assistant to George Bush. In order to keep the Media Consortium business money coming in, Edison Media Research has always edited, or “cleaned” as they put it their data since that time. The raw data exit polls are stored at the University of Connecticut. No one has ever requested them. We are requesting it for the first time. People who want to see raw data are often labeled “conspiracy theorists”. We want to make sure you know that we will be described as such. Actually, we are just people wanting to see unedited exit polls and to learn what really happened during our primary elections. As you may know, the exit polls and the electronic vote totals are very different in eleven states. The Media Consortium and Edison Media Research canceled the exit polls for California, New Jersey, Delaware, South Dakota, North Dakota, Montana, New Mexico and Puerto Rico, after receiving a letter from Cliff Arnebeck, the other lawyer who works with Bob Fitrakis asking the Edison Research to put a hold on the raw data. We are expecting the Edison Media Research to file a motion to dismiss. They have up to sixty days to do this. During this time, we need to spread the word about this lawsuit to as many people as possible. We also need to raise funds to address further legal costs. If you feel inspired to support us, please donate to this lawsuit on the Ohio Election Integrity lawsuit button on Trustvote.org. We really appreciate your help however large or small. Thank you!! Our costs are going to rise significantly now. If we raise money beyond our legal costs, we will be able to direct some of this money towards alternative media education so that many people in the US begin to know about the kind of election editing that goes on. If we are successful with this lawsuit, we will then file another lawsuit to look at the paper ballots. Everyone will be educated throughout this process about the real role of Edison Media Research and the Media Consortium in presenting news about our elections. The Media Consortium consists of CBS, NBC, MSNBC, ABC, Fox News and the Associated Press (AP). Our examining the ballots will show us who really won the Democratic presidential primary. Although Bernie may have already conceded by that time or before then, at least he will know what the truth was about how many votes he really garnered. He can do with that what he wants. Additionally, voters will know the truth about the Democratic presidential primary and how votes were handled. 7/12/2016 – KPFA – Flashpoints Live w/Lori Grace, Bill Simpich & Bob Fitrakis [1500 views as of 7-18-2016] Justice Served – support site for lawsuit

NEW SECTION: Multiple CA Local Grand Jury Investigations Possible/Probable

7-8-2016 – HuffPo – Californians Call for a Grand Jury Investigation of the Primary – A Grand Jury Investigation Into the Role of the Press – The media’s influence before, during, and after the election would perpetrate a fraud on the American public. The Associated Press called California’s election the day before, giving voters the impression that there was no need to waste a visit to the polls. The day of the primary, the press announced Hillary Clinton the winner without certifiable election results. And California’s Secretary of State Alex Padilla remained silent even though the County Registrars established that too many vote-by-mail and provisional ballots were still uncounted to be certain of the outcome. These tactics by the media are propaganda at its finest, to the detriment of the democratic process. Voters who have suffered any of the above issues are urged to make their problems known to WatchtheVoteUSA.com. The group seeks to start a Civil Grand Jury investigation as soon as possible. To file a California Voter Declaration, visit WatchtheVoteUSA.com. 7-8-2016 – Submit California Voter DECLARATION – This is a quick, simple task. Click the link to fill out and submit your Voter Declaration online: California Voter Declaration

NEW SECTION: JAM PAC – National Class Action Lawsuit seeking redress for the fact that the Bernie Sanders Donors and Voters were defrauded by how the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz ran the Dem party primaries

NEW SECTION – CA SAN DIEGO Lawsuit to stop Certification of the CA Election Results

NEW SECTION – CA 7-12-2016 SAN BERNARDINO Election Lawsuit

Election Justice Resource Links Section

Links in the Past Updates:

Action Items:

Closing Thoughts

7-4-2016 Ted Rall Who are you going to believe: us, or your lying eyes? That’s the good word from Democratic Party powers that be and their transcribers in the corporate media, in response to the “allegations” by Bernie Sanders supporters that the nomination was stolen by Hillary Clinton. I used scare quotes around the word “allegations” because the truth is plain to see and undeniable by anyone with a microgram of honesty: Hillary Clinton cheated. If the rules had been followed, Bernie Sanders would be the nominee. As with all things Clinton, of course, definitions matter. It depends on what the meaning of “cheat” is. To most people, “cheating” means breaking the rules of a contest. By this standard definition, there’s no doubt that the Clinton campaign, its political allies and the Democratic National Committee cheated in favor of Clinton and against Sanders. They broke the law. They disenfranchised voters. They broke party rules. And they violated long-standing customs that are so widely accepted that they are essentially de facto rules of the Democratic Party and the American political system. Bernie Sanders, on the other hand, ran a clean campaign.