In the past 10 years, “sponcon,” the business of getting paid to promote a company via your social media, has spread pandemic-like. Sponsored content may be obnoxious (and even morally questionable at times), but it's plenty legal—as long as influencers cop to the fact that they're being paid. The Federal Trade Commission says that if influencers have received money, gifts, or anything else that could affect how users view their mention of a brand or product, they should disclose it prominently in the post. Few do. Unsurprisingly, the agency isn't actively monitoring individual influencers. And the short life of stories on Instagram and Snapchat means it's even easier for covert #ads to simply disappear. Welcome to the weird—and booming—industry of influence.

The amount of sponcon in your feed has exploded.

When it comes to social media shilling, Instagram is by far the fan favorite. People branded as “influencers” posted more than 3.7 million #ads to the platform in 2018. That's 43 percent more than the year before. And those numbers only include the properly disclosed ads.

*projection

And companies are spending more ad dollars on influencers.

Traditional ads suck, and brands know it. But people choose to follow influencers, and they are primed to heed their recommendations, #sponsored disclosures be damned. Inevitably, influencers are hawking some weird stuff: miracle weight-loss detox teas, text-therapy apps, entire apartments, scammy island music festivals.

Which means there's a lot of money to be made.

But with great reach comes great responsibility. Take model turned actor Luka Sabbat and his 1.7 million-ish Instagram followers. Last September, PR Consulting paid him $45,000 to wear Snap's bulbous video-recording sunglasses, Spectacles, in Instagram posts and stories during Fashion Week. By the end of October, the PR firm filed suit against Sabbat, alleging, for one thing, that he shortchanged them by at least two posts. Among the requirements in the contract …