For the first time, the budget allocates some $41.8 million for unmanned aerial vehicle “integration and interoperability.” That’s part of strategic plan rolled out in 2013.

The document lays out a wish list of capabilities for the drones of tomorrow. They include the ability to process vast amounts of sensed data rather than just transmit it, stay over a target for days and communicate with a wider variety of other systems. The missions also expand from just ISR and close ground support to air combat (presumably drone on drone) and even “non-lethal crowd control.”

The request also asks for 29 new Reaper drones, which are in demand to fight terrorism, a larger buy than last year. Not all drones fared well, however.

The Navy’s Unmanned Carrier Launched Airborne Surveillance and Strike, or UCLASS, drone was basically sent back to the drawing board for a year. The program saw a drop of funding from more than $400 million down to just $134 million.

It’s the surest signal yet that the military increasingly understands that some of the most innovative thinking in technology is happening outside of the Pentagon

Many drone proponents were actually pleased. Paul Scharre, a senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security has long argued that the UCLASS was poorly conceived, overloaded with intelligence capabilities and capable of 14 hours of uninterrupted flying. Program detractors like Shawn Brimley, executive vice president of the Center for a New American Security, at a House Armed Services Committee hearing last year said that the plane should be reconsidered as more of a fighter with better weapons, even if that made it heavier. In fact, the entire fate of the aircraft carrier as a credible projection of power depended on it.

“It's a question of ensuring that the aircraft carrier can project (and sustain) power over longer ranges. I don't think the carrier air wing will be able to be all that effective in the future if we don't develop something like a UCAV,” he said referring to a sizable drone that can provide real combat support to fighter jets, or that “that can complement other strike capabilities in the air wing,” and not just take pictures.

Navy representatives last year told the committee, “Frankly, that does not exist. It’s not technically achievable today.”

Perhaps next year?

The military has its eyes turned again to space. The budget requests $7 billion for Defense Department space programs. Expenditures for Navy satellite communications systems rose from $11 million to nearly $21 million. Spying from space also became more expensive. The request for space-based reconnaissance jumped from $78 million to $100 million this year. Architecture and support for space electronic warfare rose from $18 million to nearly $30 million. The Air Force space situation awareness program rose from $9 million to $32 million (in the form of two satellites) and the nation’s $200 million dollar “space fence” a system to track bits of space debris and objects orbiting the Earth, received more money, bringing the total cost for that program to $243 million.