As the anti-conversion drive initiated by Hindutva outfits continue to grab headlines, RSS ideologue MG Vaidya tells ET that he is all for the Ghar Wapsi campaign but feels it should not have been done in full public glare. He feels the BJP is not prepared to bring an anti-conversion law, and, interestingly, thinks only Indian Muslims will be able to "save" Islam because they believe in pluralism.We are only doing a re-conversion. Who were the Muslims in India? 99% of them were already Hindus. How were they converted, history knows. We are only doing their Ghar Wapsi. There was a time when Hindus were not ready to socially accept re-converts, that mentality has changed.Once you leave the home, you were considered polluted…that was the mentality at that time. The idea of Hindu society then was that there was only one door, for exit. It was only after 1965 that another door for letting people in was opened.It is not a private affair. In Dangs (in Gujarat) there were so many churches, now there are no churches. Who did it? Swami Aseemanand, he was not a RSS Pracharak, he did it on his own. Now he is accused of some blast (Assemanand is accused in three terror cases including the blast in Samjhauta Express).It is not necessary to advertise it, make a show of it, but this thing cannot be hidden. They should not make a show of it, but even if they did it, is it an offence? The BJP is saying that they are ready to bring a conversion law. But are they prepared?We can still do it, if they want to come back they should be allowed to come, because it is not conversion. The government's job is limited to finding out if any force is being used. Vice-versa, Hindus can be allowed to convert to other religions but it should be by one's own choice.It is better that Hindu population in this country is more. We have not learned the principle of secularism from the British. The British ruled over Pakistan and Bangladesh also. We are a secular state because Hindus are a majority. Are not Jainism and Buddhism different religions? But they are in the Hindu fold. The Hindu code bill is applicable to the Jains, Buddhists and the Sikhs too. Have the Jains and Buddhists lost their identity? It should be applicable to both Christians and Muslims also.Yes, but let's first start with marriage and divorce. I have a draft of a common civil code prepared by a retired judge. If monogamy is good for a Hindu it should be good for a Muslim also. If polygamy is beneficial then Hindus should be allowed to marry more than one woman. If I want to divorce my wife and if she doesn’t want to, why should I convert to Islam? That has what happened in Haryana recently. Are not Muslims citizens of India, are they not governed by the same criminal law?Yes, but I have no powers to push for it. Is the government following the Constitution? Article 44 says, "The government shall endeavor to secure for the citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India." But you have not even taken one step forward.It is for the Central government to do it, I had sent it to Chhattisgarh and MP ten years back but they could not do it. I argued with them but their law department probably did not give them a go ahead.Yes, and Hindus believe in the plurality of religions. Look how Shias and Ahmediyas are being targeted in Pakistan and elsewhere... Muslims have to change according to the times. Islam can only be saved by Indian Muslims because they believe in plurality.