The NY Times came out with a dramatic article predicting climate change disasters in a draft report written by Obama embeds in the government agencies. This was the day after the U.S. was officially taken out of the Paris Accords.

In furtherance of the MSM’s propensity to lie, they lied about this report being “leaked” and kept from the public. It has been available online since January and there is no new news. There’s just propaganda.

There hasn’t been any negligible global warming in 16 years but the NY Times report says otherwise. The hysterics have come up with excuses for what they call is a “pause” in warming.

Government data has been fudged, experts have been ignored, Arctic Ice is not vanishing, and so on, but that is never considered.

The media lied and they know they lied

WaPo and NY Times are claiming the report is a leak and it was leaked because the scientists were fearful the report would be suppressed. Only, that is a lie.

The report has been available publicly since January as we know from climate scientists tweeting about it. The lying MSM is inventing a conspiracy of censorship.

Why (?) are reporters and the @nytimes and @washingtonpost lying about the climate report “leak” … what a joke. #FakeNews — Ryan Maue (@RyanMaue) August 8, 2017

Instead, NY Times leak is example of “Streisand Effect” — highlighting the Nat’l Climate Assessment & making up conspiracy about censorship — Ryan Maue (@RyanMaue) August 8, 2017

One of the scientists interviewed by the NY Times tweeted:

Good golly, BBC asked me if I leaked our climate sci report to the media. I said, NO–why bother?! It was publicly available during review. — Katharine Hayhoe (@KHayhoe) August 8, 2017

Side-by-side comparison shows that @nytimes has public review version of our new climate sci report – so, no leak. It was available to all. — Katharine Hayhoe (@KHayhoe) August 8, 2017

It’s not clear what the news is in this story; posted draft is public review draft from Dec, and WH review hasn’t yet missed Aug 18 deadline https://t.co/0sZxCCvoMn — Bob Kopp (@bobkopp) August 8, 2017

And finally this:

Why would Trump want to bury NC4 Climate Science Report with no news & will be forgotten/castigated as “too conservative” ? @RogerPielkeJr — Ryan Maue (@RyanMaue) August 8, 2017

Technically, the NY Times finally did upload a fifth draft – switched it out after publication – that isn’t public yet but scientists explained there are no substantive changes over prior documents.