Download raw source

Delivered-To: john.podesta@gmail.com Received: by 10.25.24.71 with SMTP id o68csp89107lfi; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 18:48:41 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.229.98.7 with SMTP id o7mr10085744qcn.30.1425523720984; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 18:48:40 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: <jennifer.m.palmieri@gmail.com> Received: from mail-qa0-x22d.google.com (mail-qa0-x22d.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22d]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l35si3249951qkh.56.2015.03.04.18.48.40 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Mar 2015 18:48:40 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jennifer.m.palmieri@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22d as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22d; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jennifer.m.palmieri@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22d as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jennifer.m.palmieri@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: by mail-qa0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id x12so5552801qac.4; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 18:48:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:mime-version:subject:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=nQZq97ftFcRdSQNj9Sgkp6ludUy5kjSJ5/K4pXfE7Dw=; b=yaZNagUJotfDqZqUY6xv/tSU92nR2O47nsP+ta6aL1Y/p0+7tslx9Ti2AHqVNHOmrj ePiJbXs29Z9NRs3ehAq31sYi4K3wZ4EOgX0s2/EAteBsgsT/GYQnBG+rcnpRsVOce+BX Pgomgve6bo/9q+45ra8xVMFDq7XEvpHgZnPhqTErNPlBOxMjc7xLY7jFClNBSVfBMRG7 5Z8uDz241nkeXgeQxAs12ep16ItUmqmPjMPtngVAdgp6yrwwhioZ7kwaHpptBq7rC3Vg wPNzyUv81pu/2qgFsBA/Ro27fztqDNZBBDHOiFplGWMUPp6/Zse73Fzo5Jdx315TEAcr au4A== X-Received: by 10.140.43.11 with SMTP id d11mr9295807qga.95.1425523720299; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 18:48:40 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: <jennifer.m.palmieri@gmail.com> Received: from [10.77.110.250] (mobile-166-171-186-175.mycingular.net. [166.171.186.175]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 16sm2099414qkx.2.2015.03.04.18.48.39 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Mar 2015 18:48:39 -0800 (PST) From: Jennifer Palmier I <jennifer.m.palmieri@gmail.com> X-Google-Original-From: Jennifer Palmier I <jennifermpalmieri@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Emails development X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12B436) In-Reply-To: <A398C3A9-53F9-41A0-9248-BC5C4FF744E3@aol.com> Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 21:48:45 -0500 CC: Jennifer Palmier I <jennifer.m.palmieri@gmail.com>, "Margolis, Jim" <Jim.Margolis@gmmb.com>, Joel Benenson <jbenenson@bsgco.com>, Teddy Goff <teddy@precisionstrategies.com>, Robby Mook <robbymook2015@gmail.com>, Kristina Schake <kristinakschake@gmail.com>, John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8E3A8991-F8FE-4F96-8644-6BE4CB5E2829@gmail.com> References: <A2030020-246D-443F-A0B7-ABEA6C5EF2D1@gmail.com> <D11D14DD.16E02%jim.margolis@gmmb.com> <F16B7D2C-0C62-4A46-990B-41951F15E834@gmail.com> <A398C3A9-53F9-41A0-9248-BC5C4FF744E3@aol.com> To: Mandy Grunwald <gruncom@aol.com> Those guys are all in the 55k. Sure there will still be haters who say it i= s not enough, but it will be an unprecedented release of emails. No one el= se would have done anything approaching this (in an federal administratio an= yway). Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 4, 2015, at 9:34 PM, Mandy Grunwald <gruncom@aol.com> wrote: >=20 > Agreed. >=20 > Do we have a definition of "truly personal"? "Family and friends"? >=20 > Are Huma, Philippe, Cheryl etc included in the 55,000? >=20 > Mandy Grunwald > Grunwald Communications > 202 973-9400 >=20 >=20 >> On Mar 4, 2015, at 8:20 PM, Jennifer Palmier I <jennifer.m.palmieri@gmail= .com> wrote: >>=20 >> 55k is entire batch of emails she gave to State. So that represents all o= f her email that was official business. Only emails we would not be making p= ublic are her truly personal ones. >>=20 >> Sent from my iPhone >>=20 >>> On Mar 4, 2015, at 8:01 PM, Margolis, Jim <Jim.Margolis@gmmb.com> wrote:= >>>=20 >>> Yes. >>> If there is a release of the 55K, are there others that are not being >>> released? >>>=20 >>> On 3/4/15, 7:25 PM, "Jennifer Palmier I" <jennifer.m.palmieri@gmail.com>= >>> wrote: >>>=20 >>>> Team - wanted to let you know that Cheryl is working with State to get >>>> agreement on release of the 55k pages of emails she have to State. The= >>>> hope would be that we are able to say tonight to the press that we are >>>> working with State to get emails released soon. Not sure where those >>>> discussions will land, but hope is either State agrees to release on >>>> timely basis or we pledge to release them ourselves in ten days/week. >>>> Assume you all would agree this is right move? >>>>=20 >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>=20