Andrew Anglin

Daily Stormer

July 11, 2015

The narrative is now shifting.

First, it was Merkel’s “all of these people from Senegal and Nigeria have to escape Libya,” which the media loved and ran with for months. Then all of the sudden people were like “but wait, why are all these people in Libya?” and then they were like “you know, I bet they’re in Libya because they want to get on a boat to Europe.”

This meant that the idea that they had no choice but to flee Libya was nonsensical. So then they started saying “yeah, well, also they have to flee their own countries, maybe there is a war there also, or whatever.” But this was a very weak argument, and too close to reality to be taken seriously (the “they’re in Libya for no reason but they must flee there” bit was so insane people felt uncomfortable questioning it).

Now, at least, we are entering basic reality. The actual fact is that After Libya collapsed, there was no government to keep these people from coming into the country and boarding boats to Europe. And of course they want to go to Europe because their own countries are poor and in Europe they get free everything.

So the question becomes: do we want to give infinity Africans infinity free everything for all of infinity, simply because they want it?

The UK immigration minister has now come out and acknowledged that there is such a thing as objective reality.

Daily Mail:

The majority of people trying to cross the Mediterranean are economic migrants seeking out a better life and are not fleeing persecution in their own countries, the immigration minister has claimed. James Brokenshire also warned that programmes to relocate those who reach Europe risk exacerbating the crisis when he appeared in front of a sub-committee at the House of Lords today. But his comments have drawn sharp criticism from refugee groups, who say it is just another example of the Government trying to distance itself from the crisis which has seen 1,800 people drown in the Mediterranean since the beginning of the year.

So the fact that people died trying to get riches means that they deserve these riches?

Listen, woman – people also died trying to get the Maltese Falcon. Do they all deserve it?

Are there an infinity number of Maltese Falcons? If there were, surely people wouldn’t be risking their lives to obtain it.

Mr Brokenshire said: ‘In terms of the mix of people who are seeking to make that journey, our estimate is that the majority of those are probably economic migrants, rather than those who are fleeing persecution or some sort of civil conflict. ‘Therefore it is to try to make a better life in the EU rather than on that greater humanitarian side.’ … Many have landed in Greece and Italy, leading to EU leaders announcing 40,000 migrants will be relocated from the besieged countries over the next two years.

LOL @ 40,000 in two years.

What is that like 1%?

Mr Brokenshire – who said between 500,000 and 600,000 Libyans were estimated to want to travel towards Europe – also argued there was an intrinsic ‘weakness’ in the scheme, as ‘you might try to relocate people to one country but the reality is they are unlikely to stay there’.

Did he really say “Libyans”?

I’m having a very hard time believing he said that. No one is saying that anymore, it’s been months since anyone claimed these people were originating from Libya – Merkel and Amnesty International don’t even claim that anymore – and this dude seems to have a little bit of a clue.

But Refugee Council chief executive Maurice Wren reacted angrily to his comments. ‘The immigration minister’s sweeping judgment that the majority of people arriving on Europe’s shores from some of the world’s biggest refugee producing countries are economic migrants is utterly startling,’ she said. ‘The Government must stop looking for flimsy excuses to justify dealing with this humanitarian crisis at arm’s length.’

Well, they are either economic migrants or war deserters. Because I have noticed one thing looking at these pictures: they are all healthy men in their twenties.

And as far as I’m aware, sub-Saharan Africa doesn’t have any more wars now than it has had for the last 50 or so years. In fact, significantly less.

So. What are we talking about here, exactly?

Can you not simply be straight with us?