Although it might take a law degree to go through all the legalese, according to the suit, Acushnet’s patent infringement claims stem from technical areas such as the Shore D hardness of cores; the coefficient of restitution for the first three layers of the ball versus the finished ball and amount of dimple coverage, among other things. Costco’s suit asks for a declaratory judgment confirming that Costco is not infringing any Acushnet patent rights as a result of its sale of the KS ball, as well as reasonable attorney’s fees and other costs involved with the suit.