Copenhagen – Hypocrisy – Fraud – Confidence Trick

Over the next few days in Copenhagen, World leaders will try to work out how they can produce something positive from what has been somewhat of a debacle, as each day, a new crisis seems to be thrown up. Led by the Major leaders of the most important Countries, they will attempt to work out something. Both the UN, and those major World leaders need something positive to save losing face, the UN on the overall scene, and those major World leaders at home, because they want to take any decision here back home to implement their own agendas, and if nothing really substantive comes out, then that makes it more difficult for them back home.

There is no doubt that they will try and come up with something, because there is no way the UN will come out and admit that nothing concrete can be agreed to. The spin will be that this United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) COP15 Conference was in a actual fact quite successful. That’s the way of the UN. They will try and find some sort of consensus that they can announce to the World, showing that they are the only ones looking after the future of our Planet. They NEED something successful to be produced, because, for them, there is too much at stake, not the spin that they deliver on a daily basis, but the underlying reason for all this. They have to protect the most important thing they have, and to that end, they have engaged in the most massive of confidence tricks.

They consistently tell us that CO2 emissions are the cause of global warming/climate change, and that something drastic and immediate needs to be done to lower those emissions. However, by the end of the Conference, the truth of the matter is that nothing whatsoever will have changed with respect to CO2 emissions, and no decision they make will make them decrease.

They can spin the Science for all they please, but emissions will not come down in the long term, let alone in the near term.

That’s where the hypocrisy, the fraud, and the confidence trick come into it.

The confidence trick has been played on those scientists by the major world leaders. For so long now they have been directing what now amounts to Billions of dollars, and perhaps even hundreds of billions of dollars to scientists, both individually, and in research facilities and universities, and other establishments, to explain why CO2 is causing what has now been described as catastrophic global warming. Those scientists, who for decades and longer have worked on shoestring budgets, or no budget at all, have recently seen vast amounts of money being pushed in their direction. To that end, they endeavoured to find every single piece of what they now call evidence to support that finding, and to ensure that the money keeps flowing. More and more scientists came on board, finding more and more correlations in support of the argument. Now we find that absolutely everything can be put down to global warming or climate change, and because of that, we now are in the situation where there is now the single largest body of so called scientific ‘evidence’ than there has been for anything of a scientific nature in history.

Those politicians and World leaders have cashed in on what they instigated in the first place. They now have what they call vast proof that CO2 causes global warming. Those scientists who dispute these findings are marginalised, sneered at, labeled with epithets, have their funding rescinded, roundly attacked by nearly all media outlets, scoffed at, sneered at, and even laughed at. Scientist has turned against scientist.

All this has played into the hands of those politicians and World leaders.

Why have those politicians and world leaders done this?

The scientists have concentrated on their special field alone. They even know the main source of the CO2 emissions, that being from the coal fired power production sector. They tell us that the vast emissions from this main source are the main contributing factor, and tell us that the only way to avoid absolute catastrophe is to reduce those emissions.

This was an absolute Godsend for those politicians.

Running concurrently now with that science is the political part of all this equation. Now they have their ‘proof’, and they have a source, those politicians have come up with what they call the answer.

Their answer is to regulate that CO2, place a cost on it, and then spin that with the science. The cost can be in two ways, either an outright cost on the CO2, or with a Cap and Trade mechanism, and either way, they win. Now, because of that science that backs them up so neatly, it becomes an easier thing to foist on the public. They tell them that the science demands that they they do something. In effect. they have found a beautiful way to impose what amounts only to a huge tax, and then make it completely acceptable to the people, who will be happy to pay it, because they are led to believe that this will solve the problem of the approaching catastrophe that they have all been scared into believing.

So, then, why is it a fraud?

No one has even bothered to ask an electrical engineer. They have become so caught up in the science, that the root cause of the whole thing has become totally lost. Any electrical engineer will tell you that there is no way to replace the power that is currently being delivered by those coal fired power plants. True, it can be replaced by Nuclear power plants, but only a very few Countries are rich enough to instigate measures to construct those nuclear power plants, and we’re not talking one or two nuclear plants. We’re talking in the vicinity of thousands of them. So now you see the predicament regarding nuclear power plants.

Coal fired plants, (and nuclear plants) are the only ones that can run at near full speed for 24 hours of every day, barring scheduled and planned maintenance down time, supplying huge amounts of a constant and regular electrical power. You will be led to believe that these plants can be replaced by the three versions of renewable power, that of wind turbines, Solar photovoltaic, and Concentrating Solar. These three types of plant can never, and will never replace the constant power that is already being delivered by those coal fired power plants. These three types of plant are enormously expensive, take years to construct, supply minimal power, can only deliver that power for less than one quarter the time at best, need vast Government subsides, both at the construction end, and also at the delivery of power end, last only one third of the time, and the scale of power they provide is barely the smallest fraction of coal fired power.

Again, this renewable power sector is also being used by Government bodies as they direct vast amounts of money to them in an effort to make them ‘seem’ that they can be scaled up to provide replacement power.

Those politicians and World leaders know all of these things, and they know it BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT.

The UN. Well, they also know this, and they also know it BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT.

The both of them, world leaders and the UN are using the science for the reason of raising money, and here I’m not talking piddling amounts, because this will amount to hundreds of billions of dollars, and even more.

Whichever way it goes, even if they can find a way to replace the power supplied from those coal fired plants, we’re talking decades for it to come on line, and in the meantime, those coal fired plants will have to keep producing the power they do, and emitting the same amounts of CO2 they always have. In those still developing countries, well they have no power that we in the Western World already have, and to that end, for them to actually develop, they must keep constructing power plants that can provide 24 hour a day electrical power, and that’s those coal fired plants, because they are the cheapest at the front end, come on line the quickest, and the fuel to run them, the coal, is still plentiful, and relatively cheap, plentiful being the main thing here.

So, no matter what decision comes out of Copenhagen, those emissions levels will not only not be coming down, they will be increasing, and increasing steadily.

Major Western Governments will be using the science to impose that tax on emissions. This tax will be imposed on the providers of that electrical power, those owners of the coal fired power plants. They, in turn, will pass that cost down to the consumers of the electrical power in the three sectors that use it, the Residential sector, the Commerce sector, and the Industrial sector, so not only will your personal residential power bill rise, and rise considerably, but at every point, that charge will be added to all you buy, to all you have done, everything. The ploy that the Government will use is that this new monetary impost is essential to reduce those emissions. In fact, they have even stated that each year the emissions level that they impose will be lowered so that the plants will actually have to pay even more, and in the process, they have even spun this positively so that the people will not only accept it, but will be happy to do so, because they have been told that it is doing something good for the environment.

Because electricity is an essential of life in our Western World, and it is discretionary, then any changes you make to your level of consumption will be so minor as to not even register.

So, those coal fired plants will just keep humming along as they always have done, emitting the same amounts of CO2, and no amount of tax will lower those emissions.

Meanwhile. overall levels of emissions will be rising, as China especially, India secondarily, and those other developing Countries construct more of them so their people can actually have access to the electrical power that they do not currently have.

So that accounts for the major Countries that will be introducing, or attempting anyway, to introduce that new tax on those CO2 emissions.

The UN has also gotten onto this gravy train of an endless source of huge amounts of money by imposing costs on those Countries already with huge numbers of coal fired power plants. Then, as well, they will be sending in Inspectors to every Country to monitor those emissions, work out how much then comes into the UN coffers, and then add on further penalties if, (and that obviously means when) those emissions increase, which will inexorably happen.

The confidence trick has been played on those scientists by those world leaders, and also by the UN. Those scientists haven’t even bothered to find out what would happen if all those coal fired power plants were to be closed down.

The confidence trick has then been perpetrated down to the ordinary people who have been told only the science part of the equation, and not the consequences of closing down the source of those emissions. They have now been fed so much science that the brainwashing process is all but complete.

The people themselves are almost willing to pay this huge new tax, and in fact a vast majority are actually clamoring for it to be introduced.

There is so much hypocrisy in all this that it is difficult to find a place to start, but the major part of the hypocrisy is that nobody has been told the side of the argument that shows the implications of this belief in that science.

I couldn’t care less if you believe the science that the Atmospheric CO2 content (388 parts per million or 0.0388% of the total Atmosphere) is what alone is causing runaway Global Warming. You can believe whatever you want to believe, or as is the case here, what you have been directed to believe. What you need to be aware of in conjunction with that belief is the consequences.

Read what others are saying:

Cutting Wealth, Not Emissions By Andrew Bolt

Copenhagen: A Matter Of Sovereignty By Steven Groves

350: The Most Important Number In The World For Global Warming By Nick Loris

The Plot To ‘Steal The Deal’ In Copenhagen By William R. Hawkins

Gore’s Deceits Catch Up With Him By Andrew Bolt