From an absolutist framework, we will be able to make a number of claims which are open to falsification. The primary claim will be that the perpetrator will have been known to UK secret services, this is followed by the claim that they will have allowed him to operate freely with the aim of encouraging him to direct his attentions towards a geopolitical conflict where they are utilising Jihadists. This is pretty much the reason why the likes of Tommy Robinson will be locked up on nonsense and open to attack, whilst preachers encouraging Jihadism and facilitating Jihadism are allowed to run free. Jihadists are useful conflict tools, Tommy Robinson is not.

This mechanism expands further, as it is clear that Jihadists are the best friends of the western elite and as such the resultant problems which occur, such as an unfortunate bombing on western soil, or their co-ethinic’s predation of little girls/ basic savagery, will be met as problems to be managed, not resolved. This is also amplified by the elites’ electoral immigration requirements as an issue in itself. Those electoral parties and anti-Islam agitators are problems for the elite, the Muslims are not really.

The problem with Islam and by extension immigration is a problem of the elites operating in a deranged political system. The solution being put forward so far of electing anti-Islam parties appears obviously laughable considering the above. Just look at Trump’s about turn on Syria. Such a prescription inherently assumes the political system has no effect on those taking power – this is magical thinking.

A further problem inherent in the common reaction to Islamic terrorism is the inability of those responding to comprehend the principals of the above absolutist model, and this leads to calls for the “people” to wake up. Blaming the “people” only makes sense within an anarchistic model of society, also known as liberalism, as opposed to a non-anarchistic model which accepts that the elite are the keys to any action or cultural development. If you believe liberalism fully, then the joke is on you, because the elite don’t.

The outlook for Islamic terrorism and further clownish Kafkaesque bullshit that will make the USSR appear amateurish by comparison is about as bleak as it gets. Burma has become a geopolitical hot spot by becoming a transit route for oil that bypasses the China Sea, so expect more Muslim violence and Western elites crying for their pet jihadis’ human rights there. The Philippines as you can see from current news will have a huge increase in their Jihadi problem because of Duterte’s China turn. The Central Asian states supplying land access from China to Europe will be subject to Jihadi upsurges thanks to the West and Saudi Arabia. Syria and the Middle East will continue being an open sore and a ground for the West using Jihadis. The business of jihadism is bright.

That means horrifying behavior will be covered up and not dealt with in the west. Sorry, but that’s just the way it is.