If approved, the bill would also mandate that anyone interviewed by the media would be able to request and receive copies of photographs and audio and video recordings taken by reporters and photographers. Such copies would have to be provided free of cost, even though state and local governments are allowed to charge the public for copies of any documents it provides.

If a media outlet refuses to provide the copies, it would be subject to a lawsuit and a civil penalty, under the bill.

In calling for subjects of interviews to get access to photographs, audio and video recordings, Welch is setting a higher standard than he and other members of the General Assembly are under. The General Assembly long ago exempted itself from the Georgia Open Records Act, which applies to all other governmental entities in the state. Only a month before the start of the 2019 session, the state was in court trying to block a group from getting legislative records on how a bill got passed in 2012.

Richard T. Griffiths, president of the Georgia First Amendment Foundation, said, “First I thought this was an April Fools joke, but this is clearly an effort to rein in those who have been scrutinizing what’s been happening at the Legislature. In this country there is a First Amendment which reads, in part: Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom of speech or of the press. This applies even to the Georgia Legislature.

“Frankly, this is the kind of proposal one would expect to surface in a banana republic, not the Peach State.”

It is not unusual for lawmakers to disagree with media coverage during legislative sessions. For instance, some Republican House members have expressed unhappiness this year with an investigation by The Atlanta Journal Constitution and Channel 2 Action News that revealed that House Speaker David Ralston, a lawyer, on numerous occasions used legislative privilege laws to delay court cases for his clients, sometimes for years.