This is a matter of national importance. Of criminality and of law.

Surveys show that 90% of British people are angry at Britain’s metrication against their will. For

centuries, Britain led the world with well thought-out imperial measurements. Their convenient

size, simple whole numbers and instantly relatable measures however, are being energetically

derided by Europhiles as inapt when the world has itself refused to adopt the metrication political

agenda unless enforced by despotism.

We are being forced, illegally, to accept poorly conceived, inferior foreign standards to our

detriment. It is as consequential as being compelled to give up our English language. But it is part

of the planned destruction of our English society because it obstructs foreign rule and subjugation.

Told we must be metric in order to trade with Europe, we have successfully traded with the world

for centuries (and the world with us) using imperial measurement which many nations have

benefited from and still choose.

Britain’s metrication also has to do with the purposeful dumbing-down of society. Where for

centuries, man has successfully worked with nature’s multiples of 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 16, his

mental capacity is being intentionally degraded to a primitive aptitude with multiples only of 10.

As one head teacher put it, “It is a serious insult to our children and abuse of their thinking

capability to deliberately limit their mental agility by imposing such a restricting system of

measurement as metrication”(Daily Mail). Many parents, apparently, agree.

Does it not occur to you that Britain’s metrication was never offered for public consideration ? It is

imposed with a religious fervour by public servants presuming to be lord and master, conspiring in

an illegal agenda against their own people. Britain’s metrication is contrary to English Law. And it

is treason. Imperial weights and measures for all purposes protected by English Constitutional and

Common Law, have been expressly authorised by Parliament in Westminster. No amending Act

has ever been introduced. British industry refused to adopt metrication until threatened with

prosecution and imprisonment. Now, industry is forced to act illegally and oblige its British

customers to do so as well. The Metric Martyrs (http://www.metricmartyrs.co.uk/) lost their court

battle to use imperial weights and measures solely because of treasonous governmental chicanery

and manipulation.

Britain will never be a “metric” nation

Despite the proclaimed importance and necessity for metrication, Britain is never likely to become a

metric nation. The people do not consent. Survey results show they reject metrication as “inferior,

restricting, inflexible, problematic, unfit for daily purpose and of limited utility”. Ask any person

on the street. They instinctively know their height, weight and approximate distance from home in

English imperial measurement. A vast majority of those taught metrication in school even, do not

know what those are in metric units and choose imperial measurement over metric anyway.

Our roads, distances and road signs will never become metric. The financial and political cost of

conversion is far too colossal for any government ever to consider risking its electoral reputation for

such an unpopular matter. The United States too, will never be metric for that reason and American

2

people reject metrication just as strongly. In Canada, metrication proved so unpopular that the

Government backed down and reinstated people’s freedom to choose imperial measurement.

Australian and other English speaking peoples also choose imperial despite governments’ claims

otherwise. Many “metric” nations use metric units in imperial quantities because only those suit

life’s needs. Metric units do not.

The argument that Britain must adopt international measurement standards is unfounded. There is

no international standard. Every metric nation uses a slightly different version while many of their

people use imperial instead. So while nations in their nationalism reject the international principle,

their populations for reason of practicality still choose imperial. The world-leading German optics

industry for example, pay lip-service to metrication as European law demands, but convert all their

calculations into imperial units for greater utility.

International law, moreover, demands that all aviation and sea going measurements be imperial.

The metre can never replace altitudes in feet as radio communication dictates the simple clarity of

whole round numbers while practical flying height above ground level cannot be divided into the

necessary range of safely separated altitudes, quadrantal cruise levels and flight levels when the

metre is much too cumbersome for such precision.

All air and sea distances are in nautical miles, yards, feet and inches and quantities are in ounces

and pounds weight, tons, pints, quarts and gallons. Note the generally single monosyllabic nature

of these. Aviation fuel is measured in pounds compatible with aircraft weight and balance

calculation and all aircraft instrumentation is in imperial as is air traffic control. Imperial units are

chosen universally for their practicality and application. The metric accounting system however, is

unsuitable as it is workable only 10s.

If the metric system offered the claimed improvement on traditional measurements, then it will have

been eagerly adopted across the world long ago. But it has not. The world’s people have

consistently rejected it. Why ? Because it offers only obstruction in people’s lives.

Problems with the metric system

An arbitrary construct arising from disquiet during the French Revolution, the metre was conceived

by the very people who tried to abolish the Christian calendar and even Christianity itself. In their

obsession to reduce every quantity to ten, they have never succeeded in decimalising time, angles or

the degrees in a circle. Space and the planet we inhabit have from time immemorial, been measured

in multiples of six squared. For its base 10 principle, metrication is a system of accounting not

measuring. Life’s dimensions unfortunately, do not obey the strict principle of measurement in 10s.

There is even doubt as to its suitability in science where many regard it a political expedience to

help progress bureaucratic meddling.

Metrication suffers intractable problems. Unlike imperial, it offers too few units each of ill

conceived, impractical size. This necessitates unnecessarily complex numbers often needing

decimal fractions whose decimal point is easily misplaced (catastrophic in medicine and science),

unseen or omitted altogether. Long number strings are in any case, off-putting and far from easy to

scale or mentally calculate. Unlike imperial, its units have no readily identifiable reference in the

world or relationship with man’s existence on Earth. This means their dimensions are unrelatable

unlike imperial’s instantly recognised parts of the human anatomy or commonplace articles for

immediate assessment, appreciation and ease of communication.

Whether one accepts the metre as being one ten-millionth part of the distance from the North Pole

to the Equator along the Paris Meridian at sea level (how did they ever measure that precisely ?), or

3

the length of the path travelled by light in a vacuum during a time interval of 1/299,792,458 of a

second, it is actually meaningless. Neither can be visualized much less bring any kind of

perception. The most recent incarnation of the metre as declared by the International Committee

for Weights and Measures is as a “unit of proper length” whose definition is restricted to “lengths ℓ

which are sufficiently short for the effects predicted by general relativity to be negligible with

respect to the uncertainties of realisation”. But still the metre cannot be readily identified. The

imperial foot can.

As standard divisions on scales and rulers, the inch is divided into 2, 4, 8, 10, 12, 16, 32 and 64 for

instant measurement and accuracy. The metre offers only 10ths (centimetres) and 100ths

(millimetres). Not just unduly wordy, but far less practical with life’s natural sizes. So for fine

measurement, you invariably end up with decimal fractions because the metric scale does not lend

itself to the task. Perhaps not surprisingly, some modern rulers and scales offer inches only in 10ths

on one edge and centimetres and millimetres on the other as if this choice satisfied every

measurement requirement. The two are entirely incompatible so one is left struggling with

imagined parts of either. This would seem an ill-considered political decision as the 32nd of an inch

is finer than the millimetre and would more practicably associate directly with the inches edge as a

complete system.

When using imperial, how sensible was it to base every measurement from several miles down to a

matter of inches, on the yard (3 feet) ? Did you assess weight as a decimal fraction of not quite two

and a quarter pounds or measure liquid in multiples of less than a quarter of a gallon ? How

practical was it to use (say) “0.762 yard” (30 inches, the standard door width) instead of simply

saying “2 foot 6” or even “2-6” ? A standard door is 2-6 by 6-6. When did you ever measure

empty space (oven size, car boot size) in gallons ? We used width, breadth and depth which

gainfully conveyed something to us, or maybe cubic measure. The metric procedure quantifies

volume by liquid equivalent – which conveys little and cannot be visualised. Just how big is a 20

litre oven ? And how often did you consider that your airliner was flying at the standardised flight

level of 10666.6 yards (32,000 feet) ? Why are imperial measurements the international choice ?

Because they are practical, appropriately sized and have considerable utility.

Metrication’s few measures are all impractical. A kilo of produce is far more than people want.

The English pound is well suited. There is no viable metric unit in use between centimetres and

metres. We usefully have inches, feet and yards, all interrelating but distinct for life’s ranges of

size. There is nothing between metres and kilometres. We benefit from yards, furlongs

traditionally in horse racing and fathoms at sea and very conveniently, standard simple quarters or

halves of a mile. And there is nothing between kilograms and tonnes. We have ounces, pounds,

stones, hundredweights and tons for every range of weight. All imperial units offer instant

application in simple whole numbers for any size or purpose. Metrication involves large and

anomalous complex numbers in few units often involving a decimal point easily misplaced or

unseen. It is not so simple or quick to work with. What is so telling however, is that many metric

sizes and quantities throughout the world are in complex part units that approximate to the imperial

sizes. So the imperial measures were right all along then – and they use simple whole numbers.

Another frequent decimalisation problem is that it cannot use imperial’s simple whole round

numbers. Has it ever occurred to you that the imperial system was conceived to provide a measure

size suited to every quantifying need that allows simple whole round numbers for instant

comparison, mental calculation and communication. You cannot do these things with metric units.

Yet only metrication is taught in schools, denying young people the practicality of imperial

measurement. Not only is teaching metrication in place of imperial unlawful because it is contrary

to English law, but it is actively messing-up our children with illegality and cultural denial while

ensuring poorer mental agility.

4

Unbelievably, we now find the “apolitical” BBC and other TV companies and producers employing

their unthinkable political influence to sponsor and impose metrication upon unsuspecting viewers

by public broadcast and websites. Not only that, but they presume to instruct independent TV

producers in this illegal activity and the general public as to the metric measures they must

customarily use. As the British people reject metrication, this is outright treason. Yet such is the

BBC’s understanding of British measurement that we are told the imperial yard (36 inches) is

greater than the metre (393/8 inches).

From wherever around the world they report, TV companies insist on giving every measurement in

metric units presumably to emphasise the “foreignness” of the location completely ignoring that

British people do not understand, indeed refuse to understand, these foreign terms glibly foist upon

them. It is not beyond the wit of man to realise that British viewers want imperial units they

understand and that to convert metric to imperial for their comprehension is all part of the service

they pay for. Many viewers, apparently, simply turn it off as all trust and confidence in the

companies is thereafter lost.

We also find that TV companies ridiculously believe it shrewd to use miles for large distances in

Britain but metres for everything else. First, two entirely incompatible systems cannot work

together. There is no correlation or continuity. Assessing metric measurements with miles

becomes impossible. Second, it demonstrates a gratuitous determination to pursue the metric

political campaign irrespective of sense or logic, with no thought for the confusion and hostility it

causes, the obscuring of information offered and loss of public trust. Companies moreover,

advertise themselves as serial law breakers.

NOW THE LEGAL PART.

Lawyers these days are not trained or versed in English Constitutional and Common Law. Thus

few comprehend that these laws remain in force as written or that crimes against them are being

continually committed. Such crime therefore goes unrecognised, unheeded and is consequently

“acceptable”. This is why society is so insensible and lawless and it is why foreign (European) law

is so casually imported and allowed to prevail in Britain’s judicial system.

Treason is an important part of English laws. It is why many were written in the first place. These

English laws, importantly, are immutable and in perpetuity. They cannot be altered, repealed or

disregarded by Government and they were specifically written with that aim in mind so to forever

protect British people from despotic governance. Treason is betrayal or breach of faith against the

will or the interests of the person or the nation. In speech, intent or action, it is disloyalty or to

violate one’s allegiance or obligation to another, to one’s own people and thus to one’s country in

support of any other principle, state, power or authority. It carries very serious penalties.

To use or represent the metric system in Britain as the accepted legal standard British units of

measurement is to undermine and mislead the British public mind. Most commonly found in

government services and British TV broadcasting, its use is to influence the nation into believing

that Britain has accepted and adopted this alien system of measurement when in fact, the people

flatly reject it. To undermine or mislead the British nation against its will is a serious offence. It is

TREASON.

Imperial weights and measures for all purposes are protected by English Constitutional and

Common Law. They have been expressly authorised in law by the British Parliament in

Westminster. No amending Act has ever been introduced. No law, ruling or edict exists that

5

requires Britain’s metrication. No White or Green Paper, political party manifesto, Queen’s speech,

parliamentary legislative programme or popular mandate has ever suggested that Britain should or

would adopt the metric system. The imperial scales therefore remain the lawful standard British

measurement system in official and exclusive use in this country, required and protected by law.

BY LAW. Nothing else is legal or permitted.

The government inspired mantra “The UK took the decision to adopt the metric system in 1965” has

been clearly exposed as the deliberate lie that it is. It was contrived for political purpose and is

widely known as “the Myth of 1965”. The UK has never “decided” to adopt metrication. The

public have never been consulted. Their agreement or consent has never been sought, let alone

given and metrication has never been debated in Parliament. The myth arises solely from the

personal hope of two 1960’s pro-Europe civil servants and Harold Wilson’s failed sop to the French

who refused UK admission to the EEC anyway. These do not justify or authorise Britain’s

metrication against people’s will.

Britain is not and has never been part of the European Union. Metrication therefore has no claimed

purpose.

When he signed the European Communities Act in 1972, Prime Minister Edward Heath knowingly

and wilfully tricked, deceived and betrayed the British people into foreign rule by the EEC/EU.

His was the most calculating and grievous treason in British history. He gave away his country.

Upon signing, his treasonous act instantly removed him from lawful office and it failed to become

legally binding because treason has no legitimacy and cannot do that. His then treasonous

government immediately became an unlawful assembly since a treasonous government is not lawful

and has no legitimacy.

No parliament can bind a successor. But no following parliament has ever reversed Heath’s

treachery. Instead, every following prime minister and parliament has consciously and deliberately

lied to reinforce Heath’s outrageous pretence that Britain had knowingly and willingly consented to

foreign rule. As public servants, neither he nor they ever had such authority and their actions are

treasonous for conspiring against the nation’s known interests, intention to surrender its

sovereignty, using wilful deception to deliberately betray the nation and for acting in the political

interests of a foreign power. It is effectively to declare war on the British Crown and the nation –

treason in its own right.

Every parliament since Heath’s therefore, is and has been an unlawful assembly. With no

legitimacy and in knowingly committing the most evil act of treason against their own people, each

has invited and imposed foreign rule over their own country. Since 1972, not one has acted within

the law. Having solemnly sworn lifetime oaths of loyalty and allegiance to Britain, each has

conspired in this treason and they persist in deceitfully concealing the truth of their illicit activities

from the public as it has always been known that the British people would object most violently

were they ever to find out. But they are finding out. Parliaments’ treason is a matter of public

record with an overwhelming amount of Foreign and Commonwealth Office documentary evidence

released to the public domain. Over 600 pages of it on the CD “Shoehorned into the EU” are also

to appear here http://www.englishconstitutiongroup.org/. The evidence is further verified in

Hansard as a full and complete record of politicians’ statements.

No law or other binding obligation can result from treason or intent by an unlawful assembly.

English law and the supremacy of the imperial system of measurement therefore, remain as they

were prior to signing of the 1972 Act. That means that just as before 1972, metric measurements

have no place in Britain whatsoever. It also means that Britain is not and has never been part of the

European Union as every Act and EU Treaty since 1972 whether or not given the Royal Assent is

6

treasonous, illegal, null and void. So too, is any attempted standard use of the metric scales in

Britain, even as metric equivalents to imperial quantities.

The European Union has no lawful influence in Britain whatsoever. Neither does its Napoleonic

European Law. Their authority exist only in the minds of certain politicians of whose actions the

public are already very well aware. In any case, the outright supremacy of English law

automatically intercedes and strikes down any attempt to repeal, subvert, overrule or replace it. The

pretence of European influence and of metrication is pure theatre and make-believe designed at the

highest levels of Westminster to deceive and subjugate Britain to foreign rule against the people’s

will for others’ political purpose, contrary to law. It is WILFUL TREASON.

A succession of unlawful British parliaments therefore, having no legitimacy, illegally and

without mandate, wilfully import and impose upon their own people, foreign rule and

influence that have no force of law in Britain.

This includes such unlawful documents as the Weights and Measures Act 1985, the Metric

Regulations 1994 and all EEC/EU Regulations and Directives, all of which are null and void so far

as Britain is concerned. Not one has the force of law as each was brought by an unlawful assembly

of government ministers having no legitimacy (thus could not enact legislation) in the clear

parliamentary knowledge that it was treasonable contrary to English Constitutional and Common

Law. While the Weights and Measures Act 1985 was relied upon as the authority in the metric

martyrs case and others, such legislation while held to be rightful at the time, never had legitimacy

or force of law. And as Chief Justice Beresford of the Common Pleas ruled, “There is no such

thing as a bad law for if it is bad it is not law”.

Metrication in Britain then, is based solely upon the deliberately contrived lie that “The UK took the

decision to adopt the metric system in 1965” when in fact the people knew nothing about it, would

never have consented and have been knowingly and purposely deceived and betrayed by those paid

to serve them. For the avoidance of any doubt, all of the above is historical fact. It is evidenced in

public documentary record and is acknowledged by the Attorney General, the Lord Chancellor, the

Lord Chief Justice and others.

Britain’s metrication is directly contrary to among others, the Treason Act 1351, the Act of

Supremacy 1559, the Declaration and Bill of Rights 1689 and the Treason Felony Act 1848. These

laws are far beyond the reach of Parliament to amend, repeal or to disregard and just because

modern day lawyers are not trained in these laws does not mean they do not exist or that serious

offences against them are not committed. Under the Act of Settlement 1700 S4, these major

Constitutional and Common Laws are the birthright of the people. Supremacy of imperial

measurement in Britain, protected and required by these laws, is thus the birthright of the people

and cannot be removed. Acknowledged in law for all purposes by Parliament, no amending Act has

every been introduced. Only imperial measurement may be used in Britain.

Realising the truth

Not only is Britain’s metrication entirely contrary to law, but the people clearly refuse to accept it.

It serves no gainful purpose and is far from any improvement over imperial. It is a political intent

criminally and enthusiastically imposed by uncompromising Europhiles not seeing that the true

purpose of this Frankfurt School subversion technique is to remove yet another part their own

culture for ulterior motive not in our interests – the collective consequences of which their own

families will have to live with. They ardently pursue its adoption and are quick to put down anyone

7

who disagrees. Thus they wantonly encourage the commission of treason against the British nation

– their own children’s diminishing inheritance.

If metrication had offered the advantages claimed, then it will have been readily adopted around the

world without need for such tyrannical imposition and constant attempts to convince of its benefits.

But hundreds of millions of the world’s people cannot all be wrong in its rejection.

Born of the 18th Century French notion that everything on Earth should unworkably conform to

units of 10, it ignores nature’s laws of 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 16. Is the structure of crystals

decimal ? Is the structure of snowflakes decimal ? Imperial measurements were conceived

specifically to relate directly with nature and man’s existence on Earth using practical everyday

measures of relatable dimension in instantly scalable simple whole numbers. Metrication’s 10s can

do none of those things. Even worse than its few impractical units, its greatest downfall perhaps, is

its decimal point so catastrophic if lost, left out or disastrously misplaced.

With no physical reference, metric measures convey nothing relatable and are imaginary. Yet

ridiculed by metriphiles as “clumsy and old fashioned” imperial measurement has single-handedly

enabled man’s every refinement, industry, scientific progress, micro electronics, internet

technology, medical advancement and manned exploration of space. It brings considerable

advantage over metrication’s poorly conceived inadequacies.

Why then, should we ever need the nonsense of an inferior measurement system that conspicuously

offers less utility ? Rather than for Britain’s advancement, metrication is to help accomplish a dark

political agenda – Britain’s subjugation and destruction of her English sophistication and culture.

To reduce everybody to one primitive level.

Select further reading

You should earnestly read this – http://www.freedom2measure.org/Our%20Units.html#right

Truthful views about metric – http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/estatopia/inch.htm#intro

Protecting the interests of British weights and measures – http://www.bwmaonline.com/

The benefits of English weights and measures – http://home.clara.net/brianp/ametric.html

Lawful Britain Society

_________________________________

Share this: Twitter

Facebook

Print

Email

Like this: Like Loading...