I acknowledge and greatly appreciate the extended rebuild options in Season 7 when errata changes things.

But I think that in the specific case of the ACG changes even the new rules do not go far enough.

Paizo has publicly admitted that mistakes on their part caused the product to be unacceptably flawed. It is to their credit that they have owned up to the problem and taken steps to correct it.

But they have not yet gone far enough. There are many PFS characters significantly adversely affected by the changes that do not qualify for free rebuilds. These characters find themselves with features that they would not have taken under the new rules and have to pay to change those features if such a change is even possible. I have already seen several examples of such characters in the various threads prompted by the ACG errata and Season 7 changes.

This seems unfair (the customer is paying for Paizo's mistake) and poor public relations.

I would suggest that very liberal rebuilds be allowed. Something along the lines of "if your character uses features in the ACG that were significantly changed in the errata and if, in your honest opinion, you would have made different choices in your character build had the changes been in place when you built your character then you may freely rebuild those aspects of your character directly or indirectly affected by the changes".

I acknowledge that is liberal and could be considered abuseable but I think it is the right solution. The harm caused by any abuses is less than the harm caused by telling customers that they must pay to fix Paizo's mistakes.

If that is too far reaching, perhaps an alternative would be many individual exceptions. For example, "if an archetype changed, then you may retrain that archetype into another legal archetype or that class into another legal class at no cost". That particular example would fix my personal problems.