FSF/GNU future without RMS, my opinion

From: Sergey Matveev Subject: FSF/GNU future without RMS, my opinion Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 13:38:13 +0300 User-agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21)

Greetings, FSF and GNU fellows! For past month and especially last days, I am shocked about attacks, insults and blames of Richard M. Stallman and all that awful terrifying situation happening. Completely insane and hardly believed events like several GNU projects blackmailing RMS to stop representing free software, FSFE welcoming his resignation and now joint statement of GNU developers asking him to leave the GNU project at all. They fear that RMS is some kind of barrier for gaining popularity of free software. Free software has NEVER been about popularity. It is open source about. Free software mainly is about ethics and importance of ethical decisions. * I tend to spent all my free time developing free software. Why? Because of RMS convinced me the importance of movement's ideas and targets. * I talk with my employer and take vacations to write software outside the work, to forbid employer making it non-free and to copyleft it. I doubt I would ever think about all that issues if there will be no RMS articles and talks. * Several times I was a speaker at meetups and conferences and every time I mention and underscore the importance and necessity of free software in our life, that no security can be achieved without it. Software can be opensourced, but that does not mean we are able to control it, control our computers. I done that because of RMS exclusively. * I have bought free software related products like OpenMoko, Lemote YeeLoong and similar things not because of their quality, not because I want to deal with them as a developer, but because I want to support projects supporting free software. Without RMS I hardly will be interested in them. I can not imagine that I will ever notice FSF organization existence without RMS. What is GNU without RMS? Well, without its philosophical section is just yet another organization developing software, like Apache, RedHat etc, with hardly considerable value amongst them. Some of GNU creations are incredible and a must-have. Some are not. But the most important thing that they are free software. RMS taught and showed me how this is the most important. Would I use XXX software? Literally my first question will be "is it free?". If no, then no way I would be using it, even if no other software exists solving the desired task. Would I use opensource/free software because of its quality and popularity? I am in Unix-like world for nearly 20 years and let's look at its most popular GNU/Linux distribution Ubuntu -- its quality sucks, that I hardly believe it is tested before the release. Also all that systemd cancer is a reason I use FreeBSD, OpenBSD systems instead of any popular GNU/Linux distribution. If there will be no free software *BSD systems, will I use GNu/Linux distributions? Well, yes, of course, because at least they are free software, however their quality sucks. Popularity and quality is the questions of open source movement, that fails reaching its quality and excellence goals. If not RMS, then I will use something like Solaris, probably will have wife with children and hope that I am bringing no less value to society. What can I see happening now? Total hypocrisy, where some well-known hackers, highly intelligent men are weak and fear to unsatisfy the loud useless minority of someone does not like absolutely adequate (however not everyone will agree with) but misinterpreted and misunderstood RMS comments on the subject totally unrelated to free software. Who ingratitudely immediately joins all that brainsick blaming without having anyone/anything to "replace" him with, having nothing that fulfils the task of free software movement's ethics spreading. FSF and GNU can do whatever they want, but without RMS they will be hardly visible. -- Sergey Matveev (http://www.stargrave.org/) OpenPGP: CF60 E89A 5923 1E76 E263 6422 AE1A 8109 E498 57EF

signature.asc

Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

