“Two Jews, three opinions.” It’s a very common saying, but it’s also a very dishonest one. Jews and their gentile allies use it to suggest that Jews are on all sides of every political argument, so they don’t have a decisive influence one way or another. But on some matters there’s an overwhelming consensus among Jews and it’s decisive in shaping important policies. For example, back in 2004 the Jewish intellectual David Aaronovitch, a fixture of the British commentariat, was musing in the Guardian on “The Joy of Diversity.” He first ludicrously claimed that a vapid “respect for diversity” can “bind” completely different groups “together,” then went on to bash those Whites who don’t accept nonsense like that:

Respecting diversity can almost be a value in itself, one which binds together the girl from Hunan who served me with coffee in Starbucks yesterday and the assortment of quiet, paper-reading ethnicities who shared my tube carriage on Friday. It is the BNP [British National Party] supporter in Burnley who seems like an exotic, incomprehensible stranger to me. (The Joy of Diversity, The Guardian, 29th February 2004)

Burnley is a town in Lancashire where large numbers of Pakistani Muslims have settled against the wishes of the native White inhabitants. Those Whites turned to the British National Party, the only party prepared to stand up for them rather than demonize them and dismiss their concerns as racist and Islamophobic. David Aaronovitch is supposedly British, but he claims that British Whites who stand up for their own interests are “exotic, incomprehensible strangers.”

He’s lying even as he says that. He doesn’t find White BNP-supporters “incomprehensible.” He understands their behaviour perfectly and finds it threatening, which is why he inverts the truth and labels those Whites “exotic.” He’s trying to pathologize entirely normal people who are behaving in an entirely natural way. In other words, he’s promoting a culture of critique identified by Kevin MacDonald as central to Jewish politics.

And part of that culture of critique has been to promote immigration and ethnic diversity from all the countries of the world into the West, typically clothed in high-flown moralisms (that they don’t apply to Israel). There is no Jewish organization of any stature that opposes this process. All of the financial, political, and media power of the Jewish community is pushing in one direction only: the replacement of Western populations. Millions of Jews and, in effect, one opinion.

BHL vs MLP

Now let’s cross the English channel to France, where the Jewish intellectual Bernard-Henri Lévy is an even bigger fixture in the media than Aaronovitch is in Britain. In fact, Lévy is so well-known as a talking head that he often goes simply by his initials: BHL. But BHL was no fan of MLP, or Marine Le Pen and her party the Front National (now the National Rally). In 2017, Lévy said this: «Je me sens certainement plus proche d’un Afghan ou d’un Kurde démocrate que d’un Français votant Front National» — “I definitely feel closer to a democratic Afghan or Kurd than to a Frenchman who votes for the National Front.”

And there you have it: Aaronovitch and Lévy are two Jews who hold one opinion, namely, that they feel closer to non-White immigrants than to Whites who vote for White-supporting parties. Aaronovitch speaks English and lives in Britain, while Lévy speaks French and lives in France. But they think the same way and are hostile to White interests in the same way. They are part of the culture of critique that unites the Jewish elite more than any other topic. And Aaronovitch’s comment about “quiet, paper-reading ethnicities” was echoed in 2011 by another Jew, the former Labour immigration minister Barbara Roche:

Friday rush hour. Euston station [in London]. Who’s here? Who isn’t. A kaleidoscope of skin colours. The world in one terminus. Barbara Roche can see it over the rim of her cup of Americano coffee. “I love the diversity of London,” she tells me. “I just feel comfortable.” (Hideously Diverse Britain: The immigration ‘conspiracy’, The Guardian, 2nd March 2011)

In 2001, Roche had told the Guardian that she “entered politics — she still emphasises this today — to combat anti-semitism and xenophobia in general.” In 2003, while urging her party “to promote the benefits of legal migration,” she told the Independent that “My being Jewish informs me totally, informs my politics.” After all, she’s the “child of a Polish-Russian Ashkenazi father and a Sephardic Spanish-Portuguese mother.”

Irrational and inexplicable anti-Semitism

That’s why she was so enthusiastic about opening Britain’s borders to the Third World. Like Aaronovitch and Lévy, she feels more “comfortable” in an atomized society because she doesn’t stand out as a Jew and doesn’t fear more of the irrational and inexplicable anti-Semitism that has periodically swept Western Europe. It’s irrational and inexplicable to Jews, that is, because they can’t admit that gentiles might have legitimate grounds for objecting to Jewish behaviour.

But there is more to Jewish support for mass immigration than simply the desire to atomize White societies and feel more comfortable there. Roche was also motivated by the desire for revenge on the White British. In one speech in 2000 she was clearly gloating about her ability to direct migration policy. She was the proud descendant of Jews who had been insulted by a xenophobic White Briton. Note how she begins this section of her speech with a blatant lie:

Britain has always been a nation of migrants. There were in practice almost no immigration controls prior to the beginning of the 20th century. The 1905 Aliens Act was a direct response to Jewish immigration, and it is difficult to deny that it was motivated in part by anti-Semitism. Major [William] Evans-Gordon, an MP, speaking in support of the legislation, said: “It is the poorest and least fit of these people who move, and it is the residuum of these again who come to and are let in this country… Hon[ourable] Members [of Parliament] opposite do not live in daily terror of being turned into the street to make room for an unsavoury Pole [i.e. Polish Jew].” I expect Major Evans Gordon would be spinning in his grave if he knew that their descendant would not only be Immigration Minister but would be standing before you today making this speech. (UK migration in a global economy, Draft Speech by Barbara Roche MP, Immigration Minister, London, 11th September 2000)

Roche’s blatant lie — “Britain has always been a nation of migrants” — was borrowed from Jewish propagandists in the United States. In fact, before the Second World War Britain was remarkable for the stability of its population, whose ancestry could be traced back thousands of years, even as far as the last ice age. According to recent genetic studies, “successive waves of invaders never wiped out the existing populations but interbred with them.” And those invaders were from closely related races and cultures in Europe. Britain is not “a nation of migrants,” but the homeland of the White British.

More consensus among the hostile Jewish elite

But what does the truth matter to a Jew like Roche when there is pro-migration propaganda to broadcast and a White Christian nation to demonize and atomize? In Roche’s eyes, the White British have no right to say who can cross their borders. Resistance to migration is xenophobic and there’s a consensus among Jews that xenophobia is a very bad thing in White nations (but not in Israel). And the xenophobia of the White majority must be attacked by the minorities whom it threatens. Accordingly, the Jewish anti-racist Dr Richard Stone, a high priest in the martyr-cult of Stephen Lawrence, says that “British Jews and Muslims are natural allies.”

This is another consensus among the hostile Jewish elite: that Jews should unite with other supposedly oppressed minorities against the White majority. The Jewish Chronicle is Britain’s largest and most influential Jewish newspaper. It knows its readers very well and says exactly what they want to hear. That’s why it ran a story called “Jewish and Muslim women pledge to work together to combat hate” in 2018. The Chronicle’s readers will have read with approval of how the “largest conference gathering of Muslims and Jews in Europe has seen women from both faiths vow to work together to combat hate.”

Racially, religiously and culturally alien

Whose hate? The hate of the White and historically Christian majority, of course. Jews in Britain now “overwhelmingly back” the so-called Conservative party, but there is nothing conservative about their support for non-White immigration. Jews welcome Muslims in particular because Muslims are racially, religiously and culturally alien to Britain. Furthermore, with their low average IQs and weak academic performance, Muslims don’t present an immediate threat to Jewish dominance in fields like politics, the media, law and academia. What’s not to like about Muslims for Jews who despise Christianity and are paranoid about White Christians?

Anti-White readers of the Jewish Chronicle will also have been pleased to read that “British Jewry’s leading communal security expert” will help the “Muslim group Tell MAMA tackle Islamophobia.” The “communal security expert” is called Richard Benson and was the “chief executive” of the Community Security Trust (CST) for twelve years. The CST hate free speech about the corrupt influence of Jews on British politics and culture, so it’s no surprise to find them working with Muslims, another group that hates free speech.

Liddle evades the truth

It’s also no surprise that fierce mainstream critics of Tell MAMA ignore its close alliance with the CST. The English journalist Rod Liddle is proud to be called an “Islamophobe” and often condemns the pernicious influence of Muslims on British politics and culture. He’s also happy to criticize Blacks and once sardonically remarked that: “The overwhelming majority of street crime, knife crime, gun crime, robbery and crimes of sexual violence in London is carried out by young men from the African-Caribbean community. Of course, in return, we have rap music, goat curry and a far more vibrant and diverse understanding of cultures which were once alien to us. For which, many thanks.” But Liddle is well aware that if he criticized Jews and the CST too, he would get in serious trouble. He would not keep his well-remunerated jobs at the Spectator and Sunday Times if he identified the central Jewish role in the highly dishonest and deceitful Islamophobia and anti-racism industries.

And there’s no way that Liddle could claim to be unaware of the alliance between Jews and Muslims. As we’ve already seen, the Jewish Chronicle doesn’t hide the alliance but positively celebrates it, knowing how much its readers enjoy reading about anti-White and anti-Christian campaigns. Here’s yet another example from the Chronicle, as a “young Jewish woman and a young Muslim woman teach schoolkids about racism”. Note how the Community Security Trust are involved again, hard at work with those “natural allies” of Jews:

The classroom is full but attentive, with the students, aged 14 and 15, sitting in chairs arranged in a horseshoe shape. In front of them are two young women; Zaynab Albadry, who is Muslim, and Roxana Jebreel, who is Jewish. … The seminar is the brainchild of an organisation called Stand Up! Education Against Discrimination. It was launched in January 2017 as part of Streetwise, a partnership between the Community Security Trust and Maccabi GB which works to empower Jewish students in certain areas, including anti-bullying, personal safety — and antisemitism and discrimination. Nathan Servi, the head of education at Maccabi GB, is manager of both the Streetwise and Stand Up! Projects. “In 2015 we had a review of all our work and decided that we really felt the need to export antisemitism education to mainstream schools”, he said. “What we really wanted to do was to create an interfaith partnership. The obvious outlet for this was Tell Mama.” Tell Mama, a national project which, as its acronym indicates, works on “Measuring Anti-Muslim Attacks”, works closely with the CST. “The idea was to have somebody from a Jewish background and someone from a Muslim background, together coming into a classroom of around 30, anything from 14- to 17-year-olds and discuss racism and discrimination, with a specific focus on Islam and Judaism, and therefore antisemitism and anti-Muslim hate.” … Stand Up! has a number of other exciting projects in the pipeline. The organisation has been working on video to “introduce Judaism and Islam to young people. “It has two rabbis and two Muslim leaders, one male, one female [of each]. From the Jewish perspective there’s an Orthodox and Progressive rabbi; from the Muslim perspective, there’s a very well known imam and a female faith leader.” But above all, they’re hoping to expand the programme further afield. “In terms of reach we’ve exceeded our expectations and been in many more schools than we thought we would be,” Mr Servi says. The opportunities for expansion are “almost limitless. There are 3,400 secondary schools in the country”. (This young Jewish woman and a young Muslim woman teach schoolkids about racism, The Jewish Chronicle, 7th February 2019 / 2nd Adar I 5779)

It’s like the set-up for a joke: “This young Jewish woman and this young Muslim woman walk into a classroom.” But the joke turns out to be a sick one: the Jewess and the Muslima are there to instil guilt in White children and grievance in non-White children. It’s Roche’s revenge at work once again, with the CST directing the charade from the wings. The ideological contradictions are monumental, because Jews and Muslims are both highly clannish and xenophobic groups. The Jewish nation of Israel privileges the Jewish majority and ensures that minorities are kept firmly in their place. Muslim nations like Pakistan actively oppress non-Muslim minorities, often in ways that read like something out of Alice in Wonderland: “the new [blasphemy] laws in Pakistan were also noteworthy on other counts: there were no agreed standards of evidence; no requirement to prove intent; no penalties for false allegations, and no clear guide-lines for what actually constituted blasphemy. Most remarkably, accusers retained the right not to repeat offending statements in court in case it aggravated the blasphemy, leaving the accused vulnerable to a sentence without knowing what was said or done to have constituted blasphemy.”

To those who hate the truth…

But in Britain, Jews and Muslims unite to condemn the White majority for its racism, xenophobia and majority supremacism. And while stern-eyed commentators like Rod Liddle and Mark Steyn will tirelessly condemn the junior side of the alliance, they don’t raise a squeak against the senior side. That is, they condemn Muslims but never mention Jews. They don’t even admit that there is an alliance between Jews and Muslims.

Well, there definitely is an alliance and commentators like Liddle and Steyn need to say so. All problems caused by Muslims in Britain, from the rape-gang horrors of Rotherham and Huddersfield to political corruption in Tower Hamlets and censorship-by-murder in Glasgow, are a direct consequence of Jewish influence on British politics. Muslims are in Britain because of Jews and are fully supported by Jews in their subversion and criminality. Tell MAMA and its mentor the CST will call those statements “hate,” but that’s exactly what you would expect. “Truth is Hate to Those Who Hate the Truth!”