News Item (4/15/2020): AE911Truth, together with 9/11 family members and a large group of individual architects and engineers just submitted an official “Request for Correction” to NIST, requiring them to answer for some of the egregious flaws and deceptions embedded in the NIST WTC 7 report. We have the full documents on the Scientists for 9/11 Truth web site and also on the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth web site. Facebook just blocked me from posting the link (as a violation of “community standards”!) but somehow they allow me to link to this site, so I’m posting the links indirectly here.

(See the six-part serial essay, Free Fall on Medium.com, by David Chandler for a discussion of freefall and its implications for understanding 9/11.)

The collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC7), a building with localized fires and not hit by a plane, is one of the most telling events on the day of September 11, 2001. Yet it has rarely been shown on T.V. since the first-day reporting. A significant fraction of the American public has not seen video footage of Building 7’s collapse. Please watch this short video (compiled by Nate Flach) before continuing into this site.

9/11: Short WTC7 Video Compilation (YouTube version)

[YouTube has at various times added censorious labels to videos that question the official government account of 9/11 and a number of other topics. We are concerned that they might choose to remove this content entirely at some point in the future. We are therefore duplicating the videos embedded on this site onto Bit Chute, an alternative streaming site, leaving the YouTube link as a backup.]

This web site documents the work on the scientific understanding of the events of 9/11 by several independent researchers: David Chandler (retired physics teacher), Jonathan Cole (professional engineer), Wayne Coste (electrical engineer), Frank Legge (PhD chemist), and Nathan Flach (video archivist). We are all independent 9/11 researchers, and affiliated with Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and/or Scientists for 9/11 Truth. Our goal has been to uncover the truth and shed some light on the events of 9/11, each in our own way.

We are collaborating on this web site because we feel the work done by each of us complements the work of each of the others. Collections of our work (and more) are accessible through the menu tabs in the page header.

A talk at University of Colorado, Boulder, on 9/11/2018 about the implications of freefall of WTC 7 and the near freefall of the North Tower (YouTube version)

Playlist of Five Videos: NIST Technical Briefing on WTC7 –David Chandler, (YouTube version)

David Chandler is best known in the 9/11 Truth Movement for proving that NIST lied in denying that Building 7 underwent freefall. Freefall is a literal smoking gun for controlled demolition. See David’s 6-part serial essay entitled Free Fall on Medium.com.

David has looked at the overall behavior of Building 7 as it comes down in freefall. Others have looked carefully at the structural details and whether it is possible for the building to come down the way it did due to natural causes. Most notable in this research is a project by Dr. Leroy Hulsey at the University of Alaska, Fairbanks, who, with two graduate students, has constructed mathematical models in two different finite element analysis systems to simulate the behavior of the structure. (A quick summary of the conclusions is that fire could not have caused the observed failures.)

The Great Thermate Debate — Jonathan Cole (YouTube version)

NIST has placed itself in the untenable position of arguing, on the one hand, that the buildings of the World Trade Center were brought down by office fires started by jet fuel (kerosene) , which burn 1000°F cooler than the melting point of iron, while, on the other hand they have denied that Thermite, which burns hot enough to melt steel, could do the same job. Watch this video for a dose of reality, … Jonathan Cole at his best.

[By the way, the seminal paper, Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe, should be available at the Bentham Open Chemical Physics Journal web site. If you can’t find it there, try this alternative direct download link.]

We are in agreement with each other, and with over 2000 architects and engineers who have signed the petition at AE911Truth.org, that the so-called “investigation” we have been given by the government is nothing more than an elaborate, expensive cover-up.

So, how do we respond to the atrocities of 9/11?

Here are a few thoughts.



Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth has produced a major feature-length video entitled 9/11: Explosive Evidence — Experts Speak Out which is available on DVD or for download from the AE911Truth.org web site. There is now a 1-hour version on BitChute and YouTube (below) which was shown on Colorado PBS and became the most watched video in that station’s history. For a time it was also the most viewed and most shared video on the national PBS website. This is a breakthrough for exposure of our research on the mainstream media, where it is more typically treated as a taboo subject.

PBS Documentary 9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out Final Edition, 60min (YouTube version)

* * * * * * * * * * * *

The International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001

(Also known as “The Toronto Hearings”)

Trailer

The 2-hour video summary of the Toronto Hearings, 9:11 Decade of Deception (YouTube version)) is now available for free streaming. See the Toronto Hearings tab in the main menu above to view the whole DVD broken into an introduction and day-by-day segments.

The printed Proceedings have been published and are available from Amazon.com.

* * * * * * * * * * * *

It is generally thought that the academic community approaches significant issues without bias. However there appear to be significant pressures on the academic community with regard to 9/11, as this video documents.

9/11 in the Academic Community (YouTube version)