2015-16 NCAA Division

I Men’s Basketball

Officials Evaluation Form

(over)

Referee Umpire 1 Umpire 2

Individual’s Name

Game Information vs.

Date: Time:

Description Rating

Difficulty of game to officiate Average Difficult

Rating Codes 1 = Unsatisfactory 2 = Satisfactory 3 = Exceptional Note:

If you evaluate an official as UNSATISFACTORY in any category, please note any specifics in the comment section.

Evaluation Official

Description Rating

1.

Fitness/mobility.

Official was fit enough to keep up with the pace of the game and get in good position to observe and officiate plays in his area(s) of responsibility. 1 2 3 2.

Communication skills.

Communicates as needed; treats coaches, players and table personnel in a professional manner. 1 2 3 3.

Illegal contact/flow of the game.

Official found an acceptable balance between marginal contact, illegal contact and reducing physical play. 1 2 3 4.

Bench decorum/sportsmanship.

Official dealt properly with bench decorum and player sportsmanship issues. 1 2 3 5.

Call accuracy throughout the game.

Based on the observations of the evaluator; assess the play calling accuracy of the official. 1 2 3 6.

Game management/mechanics.

Official was aware of and correctly handled all administrative, dead ball, time outs, substitutions, scoring and timing and rules issues. 1 2 3 7.

Use of monitor/end of game officiating.

Including authorized use of courtside monitor to end game correctly.

1 2 3 N/A