nangbaby:

hellomysteriouslycoldworld:

nangbaby: hellomysteriouslycoldworld: nangbaby: hellomysteriouslycoldworld: nangbaby: hellomysteriouslycoldworld: hellomysteriouslycoldworld: nangbaby: That’s because, contrary to popular belief, I’m not that wrapped up in Tumblr or chasing popularity. If someone isn’t saying anything to me or about me, I don’t have much to say. I come and go as I please. If you’ve noticed, July and early August are merely a peak from the “Tumblr” slide. My interest in this site is waning. Plus, there is a delayed effect in people telling me I am worthless. Eventually, without support, even I will cave. Isn’t that what you wanted? Don’t start none, won’t be none. Isn’t that what you wanted?

Umm…huh? I don’t even know you. @nangbaby you seem to have issues, fam If other people say I am worthless or not who I say I am that would cause issues. who says that to you? Nearly my entire tag on Tumblr and the people who have blocked me. Yeah…not that much hate I’m seeing, fam. I have an entire tag devoted to this. Two, three, or four even. Other people have singled me out. If you don’t see the hate, you’re not looking hard enough. This is just a sample. You sure like to collect the hate shot to you. But I won’t just blindly believe you without the whole story. There must be a good reason people have hated you all this time, not just waking up one day and pissing at you Context is key.

This isn’t about you believing me. This is about me saying what happened in response to your question. If I say someone calls me a nasty name and I provide the evidence, that’s what happened, no excuses. I have called other people nasty names and have been and still am justly punished for it. If I get punished, the same measure should be held to anyone who speaks against me. All I’m asking for fairness. To put an onus on me for just describing what happened is patently prejudicial and unfair; I should be allowed the same measure of belief, consideration, and respect as anyone else.

For instance, people like you demand context from me, yet no context is required for you to agree with others and support them. However, when I do provide contextand links, it’s considered making excuses or equivocating, and that I am always to assume good faith of others no matter what.

If I say, “This person blocked me and told me to die,” then someone says, “I don’t believe you.”

If someone says, “Nangbaby is a connossieur of fail who begs for money on Patreon,” people lap it up. When I say they’re lying they say I’m whining and blindly agree with libel.

How does “context” make my verifiable account untrue and their unverfiable accounts accepted? Abuse is abuse. Sexism is sexism. Racism is racism. It doesn’t matter if the target is white or black or any other color. Something is either true or false. There is no context that would change a false statement to a true one or vice versa.

Again, you don’t have to believe me, but to discredit and undermine what I say is true without doing the same to everyone elss involved isn’t being even-handed, but unreasonably hostile towards me and declaring me as worth less than others.

If you can’t accept what I am saying despite you asking who said the awful things I outlined, then please let me be instead of backhandedly supporting death-threat tags like this.