There is tremendous hope across the country for a tax the rich plank in any of the presidential candidate's platforms, yet none of them have produced one. President Obama had one in his jobs plan but this was scaled back and later removed.To demonstrate the importance of the tax the rich plank to the American voter, Philip A. Bralich, Ph.D. of TaxTheRichDotName is seeking signatures on this petition to enter his name and more importantly, his tax the rich plank, and full platform in the presidential ballot in all 50 states.The full platform, the tax the rich plank in particular, and a statement about the family of four income economy is available at http://www.taxtherich.name website on the newsletter page.

Tax the Rich: Thoroughly, profoundly, and Punitively.





http://www.taxtherich.name



The Economic Policy (the full platform follows)



Growing up in a lower, middle-class family in the mid-west, my parents and other adults were all aware of the family of four income and what jobs and college majors would likely provide such an income. There was little interest in jobs that paid millions, but great interest in jobs that allowed you to raise a family, own a house and a car in a safe neighborhood with good schools, a hospital, a church and convenient shopping. In fact, an interest in wealth beyond that was considered tawdry at best and dismissed with lines such as, “We don’t want that kind of money.”

This was an outgrowth of the efforts of the World War II generation who came home from war to create an economy that included jobs with family of four incomes, security, 40-hour work weeks, vacations, insurance, retirement, pension plans, and social security. They provided good schools, immunizations and doctor’s checkups for their kids, and they saw pets and family vacations as important to raising children. They also supported unions to help guarantee the whole family of four system. My father would leave work decisively everyday at five to go home for dinner and take care of his family. We always expected him at six minutes after five. His insistence on leaving not earlier or later than five was part of the discipline that the World War II generation agreed was necessary to create the family of four economy. It was not “greed is good”: it was good-hearted and family oriented. It was the true right wing. The right wing that people feel nostalgia for that was destroyed by Reagan and the broken right wing that has followed him. It was not the right wing that would bury the family of four income and attack job security, 40-hour work weeks, vacations, insurance, retirement, pension plans, and social security. It was a generation that kept a wary eye on the wealthy, recognizing the sneers, spin and frozen countenances of the greedy.

Since Reagan all of that has diminished significantly as the wealthy have continued to take more and more family of four incomes out of their companies, their communities, and U.S. economy and put it in the pockets of the upper 10%. There is no excuse for it. It is not based on family values; it is not based on the family of four income; it is based on personal greed. Trickle down is as much of a joke to them as is the claim that cutting the taxes for the rich will create jobs. Both are snide dismissals of a thinking public who recognize that trickle down and cutting the taxes on the rich are merely more hands in their pockets taking away the wealth that they have rightfully earned and which deserves to go to their families.

Let’s assume for the sake of easy math that a family of four income is $50,000 per year. With that figure in mind, we can note that each $100,000 executive bonus takes 2 family of four incomes out of the company, the community, and U.S. economy. Every seven figure annual income takes 20 family of four incomes out of the company, the community, and the U.S. economy every year. Every nine figure annual income takes 200 family of four incomes out of the company, the community, and the U.S. economy every year. One $25,000,000 severance package for failed performance takes 500 family of four incomes out of the company, the community and the U.S. economy every time.

The presence of ATM’s saved banks billions in salary packages and yet rather than paying us 50 cents each time we use it, they charge us instead and think that we are unaware of the guile behind this. There are countless examples of the shiftless, cunning, conning mentality of the broken right wing but little as yet that we can do about it. They turn to us and say we are going to have to take cuts in Medicare and the minimum wage and shamelessly turn around and give themselves millions in bonuses for having done so. They turn to us and say, like Herman Cain, “Don’t complain. Go out and get a job and earn your wealth.” This jaded, sadistic dig is just one of many that are eating at the hearts of the American public. The wealthy look, act, walk and talk like perps and pimps because they are. Their targets, the American family, look, act, walk and talk like vics because they are.

They aren’t that good. We are. They did not provide the talent, creativity, hard work, inventiveness, and social skills necessary to run a business. We did. They merely developed a set of financial tools to wrench the profits from us and line their own pockets. They lower the wages, remove benefits, raise our fees and then when we have the audacity to say my child needs a doctor or my grandfather is bedridden, and I can no longer care for him, they say, “You should have thought of that earlier. You should have worked harder.” And then for the brilliance of those rejoinders, they give themselves another million dollar bonus and create a 9 figure income for a crony.

They are not making this wealth, they are taking it, and it is time to take it back. They do not grow their companies, their communities, or the U.S. economy: in fact the problems in America today are precisely the result of this shift in the distribution of wealth and this destruction of the inventor, the talent and the creative, and it is attributable to one thing and one thing alone: the greed of today’s wealthy and their inability to make judgments about anything other than the size of their wallets and their next bonus. They could see Social Security running at a profit if they did not see a huge sum of money that they could transfer into their own pockets. They could realize that government jobs are good jobs if they did not see the government payroll as a target. If they did not have their hands and minds on everybody else’s wealth, they could see that local, state and federal governments would be far more interested in creating jobs with family of four incomes than the wealthy would ever be. There would be no mansions or yachts to pay for if the government were creating the jobs. The right wing has gone so far off track as to see themselves as the new fascists and liberals as the new non-Aryans. Jesus Christ was a liberal, and we are all sure that he still believes in giving to the poor, not creating them. The family of four income represents a distribution of wealth that would be expected of a Christian country. The current distribution of wealth looks like the Rome of Christ’s time more than anything that developed out of Christianity.

The frustration of the American voting public is profound and justified and the occupy movements indicate the mere tip of an iceberg of a growing mass movement to get jobs, houses, and families back from the broken right wing that took it, the evil broken right wing that took it.

Fortunately, there is a solution at hand to return the distribution of wealth to the way it was in the 50’s: we simply need to surtax the rich. President Obama currently has a 5.6% surtax the rich bill on the table, and we can look at this as a good start that hits exactly the right note. We can surtax them to pay the national debt; we can surtax them to fix social security; we can surtax them to put student grants and loans back on the table to the levels they were in the 70’s. we can surtax them again and again and again until the wealthy sit-up straight, fold their hands nicely on the table, admit they were wrong, and put the money back. We can also be sure that a surtax the rich bill is as easily available and as easily implemented as a draft bill. The former to defend us from the rich who have demonstrated they can become internal enemies and the latter to defend us from external enemies.

There is no need for discussion or debate: this not about a fair tax. It is punitive. We can make or break the 2012 election around the surtax. President Obama has one ready to go. How about the family values right wing (not the broken right wing)?

When they say to us “Who’s going to pay for this?” We’re going to turn to them and say, “ You are!” and then press the voting button for the surtax.





We at TaxTheRichDotName, watching the developing 2012 presidential elections, have begun to suspect that there is a dark horse candidate out there somewhere. The 9 candidates on the right wing are all floundering and President Obama’s potential landslide is prevented by those voting right just because there are no real solutions. In addition to this, the entire population seems to be taking heart around the possibility that something could actually be done, that the gridlock, the borders, and much, much more could be solved if just something … just something could be done. But what is that something?

We suspect that the hope is coming from the intuition that there is a dark horse, presidential candidate out there somewhere who could actually effect a substantial change in the national and international gridlock that has so many of us and so many cultures so frustrated. The advances that we all have made over the last few centuries simply do not indicate that such a sorry state of affairs should exist, so we all lament and continue our efforts with the hope that something can actually be done and the belief that their might actually be true leadership somewhere that could actually move the entire planet beyond the , ambivalent state of hope and near despair.

If there is such a dark horse out there, our intuitions lead us to suspect that his/her potential platform would look like something like the following:

1) A Tax the rich bill to effect a redistribution of wealth that recognizes both the value of talent, creativity, social connectedness, and hard work as well as the value of wealth and ownership: capitalism skews things toward the wealthy, and communism/socialism skews things toward the work. Both seem to ignore a proper appreciation of who is actually making the contributions that create the wealth necessary to run an effective economy. A new system needs to look at the profits of a company in terms of one third for the employees, one third for the stockholders and one third for the executives. It also needs to protect the customer.

2) A reinstate the draft bill to discipline the children of dysfunctional families, disrupt the unfortunate reality of 20-something, “google” millionaire wealth, and to provide the wealthy, the politicians, and the privileged with a proper fear of the future safety of their children that would prevent frivolous, wealth or power based conflict.

3) An encouragement for the governors of southern states to call out the National Guard for a state of emergency based on the criminality that exists in their border towns. They would need one sweeping power, the power to check I.D.’s in bars, brothels, coffee shops, known crack houses and suspected crack houses as well as with the loiterers and street walkers in those villages, towns, and cities. They would also have to be careful to check everyone, white, Latino/a, Asian, and black.

4) A prison reform bill to get the psychologists and counselors out of their menial jobs and into facilities that take non-violent addicts into 30 day, 60 day, 90 day and 120 day treatment facilities (over and over again) until they understand themselves, their families of origin, and a twelve step program sufficiently to turn their lives around. This would save billions compared to the current incarcerations in prisons for so many years. The entire population is beginning to look like an episode of Lock Up and for that reason, we must conclude that reform is necessary. We are being too harsh and ignoring real solutions.

5) A health care bill that would transform the current situation that has turned health care into the murder of the elderly and the poor and the indulgence of the privileged hypochondriac into one that understands, educates, and heals those who require medical attention.

6) A GI Bill that actually allows our veterans to get the help they need and the appreciation they deserve without the spin and grousing of the bitter.

7) Student grants and loans that the student aged can actually qualify for. Keeping the amounts at the level of the 70’s while disqualifying most and leaving them to the despair driven drug and bar scenes merely creates a frustrated youth with no access to anything but anarchy and revolution.

8) A collective bargaining amendment that would both guarantee the family of four income and avoid the abuses of unions that have been demonstrated since the time of Samuel Gompers.

9) A bill or a committee that could guarantee that social security and Medicare could be run at a profit just as insurance companies do in the private sector.

10) A bill that could guarantee that the ten commandments and nativity scenes can be enjoyed by the secular as well as the religious as cultural and historical realities that we all want to enjoy and protect them from a few nitpicking spoilsports who want to abuse the separation of church and state.

If we can find that dark horse candidate with this platform, we might be able to effect the change we all suspect is lying just around the corner.

Sincerely,

Philip A. Bralich, Ph.D.









Sincerely,

Philip A. Bralich, Ph.D.