@article{7125635, abstract = {Predation causes a lot of suffering in the wild. Yet, a lot of people believe it is morally permissible. This article presents an ethical principle that justifies (condones) predation without referring to anthropocentric notions such as moral agency or species membership. The moral intuition that predation is permissible is coherent with other intuitions about harmful behaviors in the wild, such as the permissibility of some kinds of procreation (for example r-selection) that do not sufficiently contribute to wellbeing. These intuitions can be unified in an ethical principle that uses the three conditions of naturalness, normality and necessity. Furthermore, this 3-N-principle is related to the intrinsic value of biodiversity. Finally, some analogies between well-being of a sentient being and biodiversity of an ecosystem are discussed.}, author = {Bruers, Stijn}, issn = {2280-9643}, journal = {Relations, Beyond Anthropocentrism}, language = {eng}, number = {1}, pages = {85--91}, title = {The predation and procreation problems: persistent intuitions gone wild}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.7358/rela-2015-001-brue}, volume = {3}, year = {2015}, }