Skip to comments.

Posted on by maggief

(Excerpt) Read more at wikileaks.org ...

To: maggief

The Mook is the smuggest ass ever.

To: maggief

To: maggief

Thank you, honorable Special Agents, for refusing to comply with the cover-up orders.

Agent Leaker does not look Russian to me.

To: maggief

To: MNDude

Sounds like there was a plan in advance for Bernie to lose.

To: MNDude

I bet he cries if Hillary loses. To his ilk, we are back in the middle ages if the evil Trump is in the White House. That’s how these people think.

Robby Mook is smarmy and snarky. He’s pajama boy personified. He’s a snarky liberal know it all.

To: maggief

To: MNDude

Cheryl Mills is a close second. She seems to have a perpetual smirk on her face.

To: maggief

I wonder how the the progressive grass roots will feel about one of their top 'strategists' talking about Bernie Sanders campaign in the past tense before the first primary vote.

This email was sent in December 2015.

To: MNDude

He sucked his way to the top. He'll be spat out soon.

To: maggief

Follow the link to the message on Wikileaks -- they have added something new:

Secondary verification by google.com DKIM key

This is a big deal, and I wish there was an explanation, or at least a link to an explanation.

What this means is that the message was signed with DKIM when it originated at GMail. Neera Tanden sent the message from her Gmail account, and the DKIM signature was added to the header at that time.

What does this mean?

The message is authentic, and has not been modified since origination.

The DKIM signature is generated with a mathematical algorithm, using the content of the message and selected header fields as the input. In this case, the Date:, From:, Subject:, and To: fields are among the header fields verified.

More information here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DomainKeys_Identified_Mail

Why is this important?

The participants cannot claim the message has been "doctored" to make them look bad.