Download raw source

Delivered-To: john.podesta@gmail.com Received: by 10.25.24.103 with SMTP id o100csp1936934lfi; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 18:26:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.170.155.193 with SMTP id w184mr973332ykc.43.1433467610208; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 18:26:50 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <re47@hillaryclinton.com> Received: from mail-yh0-x22b.google.com (mail-yh0-x22b.google.com. [2607:f8b0:4002:c01::22b]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h83si4000033ykb.86.2015.06.04.18.26.49 for <john.podesta@gmail.com> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Jun 2015 18:26:50 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of re47@hillaryclinton.com designates 2607:f8b0:4002:c01::22b as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4002:c01::22b; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of re47@hillaryclinton.com designates 2607:f8b0:4002:c01::22b as permitted sender) smtp.mail=re47@hillaryclinton.com; dkim=pass header.i=@hillaryclinton.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=hillaryclinton.com Received: by mail-yh0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id k3so10661635yha.2 for <john.podesta@gmail.com>; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 18:26:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hillaryclinton.com; s=google; h=from:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pnJJWoh3gpazvYAGBfhhB9f1HvoO6e7gCiaMShptBoE=; b=avsLXFTwWfe+neJxHfBXVGqpJf5zC5H/GBX8YGFXdgEJeeMMqx5BVpCvXwNxqCsq1K qTnKA8mSr696tAPXLNrCChKfAwatu+EzvCqz3x45QS1lZWO60CCjP3NbUo05pkdDzE7T Evew+7629qHJ5Tq1AxnHuHeud0CUpCUPH75WA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pnJJWoh3gpazvYAGBfhhB9f1HvoO6e7gCiaMShptBoE=; b=FYhRPdQ6e3sUrXn5mTWO/7gZTB+F0ymrl5AZw/Ok3GlDEi6WkCv+kWlmCvYedh+Oq2 PwddDT4/tOLyD0HsCzomGjcevbPqNMsD+WFk2+nNO9dMWVlI0nAeNxZuvNulvZaTmcD8 D3QUDRo63yjzvqEQZjFd+1vvT2EvnIiTpYOQb8BBxDE1WKhDKIWTB3vo6ezbraTztqT1 Pmfw+t7AXpzo4EGxrValJXC510ShY+StHNDtQA00lBk73rYylOewsKYfCARkYOuKcbLA 452zWakIcZ+0bxr7nWhupCrB+9kjBFDQefuOqhaVlawUtQc1+DLz9aC4Uh8hgapW4/Ip ZCSg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnGrawZNiLXwqvPjkdxS5/UYunaZ2yIiQTa347b0Be/haGe7zNVJ5vTw3Ah0yuKmU3iGRxI X-Received: by 10.129.55.200 with SMTP id e191mr197601ywa.48.1433467609321; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 18:26:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Robby Mook <re47@hillaryclinton.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: <CAH2oiqK5r-pwrLb6v72Zu08Q2sHcHSeB8WAbhWVLGjJErsRGSw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAH2oiqK5r-pwrLb6v72Zu08Q2sHcHSeB8WAbhWVLGjJErsRGSw@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 21:26:48 -0400 Message-ID: <6683279928691981095@unknownmsgid> Subject: Re: Next steps on speech draft To: Jennifer Palmieri <jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com> CC: Mandy Grunwald <gruncom@aol.com>, Joel Benenson <jbenenson@bsgco.com>, John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com>, Kristina Schake <kschake@hillaryclinton.com>, Jim Margolis <jim.margolis@gmmb.com>, Jake Sullivan <jsullivan@hillaryclinton.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks for sending Jen. I will read shortly. Correct me if I'm wrong about one other point--we are working on a longer term solution for speechwriting generally and will come back about that so we can integrate it into our larger re-tooling for the quarter. Just wanted to flag that for everyone. I'm confident we are going to have a good speech and am excited about next Sat. It's going to be a great event and a great week. > On Jun 4, 2015, at 8:51 PM, Jennifer Palmieri <jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.c= om> wrote: > > All of you should have Lissa and Jon's revised draft. > > It is good. Has some great, tight riffs in it. I particularly like the = formulation on why she is running for President and tying that back to the = Methodist creed. > > It achieves some, but not all of our speech take aways. Still needs a sl= ogan, needs more on Dorothy, and I not sure it gives you the clear sense of= where she would take the county. > > I don't think it quite captures HRC's vision. The theme I see emerging i= s that making progress is hard and you have to stick with it - as opposed t= o HRC's belief that talent is universal, everyone has a role to play, unloc= king potential, etc.. > > Dan is going to add more on Dorothy and the HRC vision to the Lissa draft= and send that back around to this group tonight and to HRC. > > Robby, John's and my belief is that Dan should have the pen going forward= and manage edits with input and writing from Lissa and Jon. I called Liss= a to tell her that Dan would manage the process going forward. She thinks = that is a mistake and does not believe it will work. Just want to be upfro= nt about that. I assume Joel and Mandy will hear from her, too. I still bel= ieve having Dan manage the process is best of not great options at this poi= nt. If HRC has a different reaction after seeing the speech, we can adjust= . > > What's everyone's reaction to the new draft?