Originally Posted by schild Originally Posted by

The bolded is a bit scary and mildly threatening. Isn't it way, way easier just say "Multiple accounts are fine, exploitation is not." Surely exploits are easy to track.



Edit: I guess what I'm saying is that I know many people with legitimate secondary accounts (and tertiary accounts), including myself - and all this policy shift does is make it possibly to be pretty boned in the future. For something that doesn't seem to serve a purpose other than to strike fear in the hearts of those that may exploit things. The value of that exploitation is debatable, but the value of the policy seems to be zero as it hurts more than it could possibly help. Is the exploitation of starter decks and trials so hazardous to the economy that account policies have to change in regards to them?