This is where the story gets weird.



HALLIBURTON

edit on 18-2-2017 by AnAbsoluteCreation because: (no reason given)



I am not writing this thread to convince anyone of anything. I simply present a theory from a Russian Nuclear Scientist and the coincidental evidence that I found supports what he says. Other than that, I just want to see what ATS thinks about this coincidence against accusation.Dmitiri khalezov a former Soviet Nuclear scientist, made a public claim that what hit the Pentagon was a P-700 Granite Missile.This got me interested, so I looked into it.This is a P-700 Soviet era Granite Missile. It's an ICBM that can travels at Mach 2.5.To me, a missile impact explains much more than a plane impact. Here's why I say that...I find it absolutely impossible that an aluminum nose and fuselage can penetrate reinforced concrete through three sectors of the Pentagon. This is literally what these missile are meant to do, not airplanes.Then leaving this perfect impact three levels deep into the Pentagon.The first thing I thought was, how did a Soviet era ICBM hit the damn Pentagon. That's where things took off. As I was researching the P-700 Granite Missile I stumbled on the sinking of the Russian submarine The Kursk in 2000 where all 131 men on board died.I'm sure many still remember the Kursk sinking because it was a very bad public relations incident for Putin. He was on holiday and said he'd deal with it swiftly when he returned from Holliday. Additionally, reports surfaced that they heard knocking from within the sub 48 hours after sinking, insinuating men were still alive.But that story was soon buried and it came out that those knocks are automatic timers in the mechanism.Putin promised that he would raise that Submarine immediately. But the family members of the dead petitioned him not to do it because they feared more would die in the recovery. Needless to say, Putin ordered the salvage.During the bid submissions for the contract to salvage the sub, additional details started to leak.There were public stories that there were two explosions under water, one actually measured a 3.6 on the Richter Scale. Putin first claimed that a foreign sub rammed the Kursk causing the first explosion, then an onboard torpedo cause the second explosion.Here is the explosion:So when word got out that USS Memphis and the Los Angeles Long Sub was in the area, the Pentagon was forced to make a statement. They stated that The Kursk was destroyed by an errant torpedo fired by one of the Russian Battleships. War Games Torpedoes never hit target. The stop before impact and float to the surface to retrieve.Putin under a lot of Pressure from the incident was willing to let the story bury itself. Until the satellite images he had previous ordered came in. Not only did Russians intercept a message from The US Memphis that it needed to emergency port in Norway for repairs, but the satellite photos actually confirmed the docking on Norway.Here is a picture of the US Memphis and was is shown as damage to the front of the sub. The US Memphis stayed in Norway for repairs for 8 days. Before limping into Britain.It's important to mention that people in Russia still claim US and Britain sank the Kursk What's weird is that the Pentagon claimed that the US Memphis didn't check in for 4 days after the Kursk sinking.Here's the damaged to the Kursk. Look at the hole entry point circled in green. Might be torpedo? Kind of matches the idea of the US Memphis's front damage if they did in fact collide. But that's just speculation.Putin wants to raise the sub to the surface. Because on board there is a Nuclear reactor and 22 P-700 Granite Missiles on board.Guess who got the contract to salvage the bodies of the Kersk from the bottom of the ocean?That's right. The company that Dick Cheney was the CEO. Not to mention, the first company that had already had a contract mysteriously bowed out of their obligation allowing Halliburton the job. Conventional ways to enter the sub were blocked so Halliburton literally cut off the nose of the Sub, giving it access tot he missile silos.If that is not weird enough, Russian, supported by Dmitiri khalezov claimed that there were 3 missing P-700's. Now if the story is true and one was fired during exercise, then that would mean that two were missing.Which leaves me with the question: If people think it's impossible for a plane to breach 6 reinforced concrete walls and it was more likely a missile. This makes this story much more interesting.But that is not all. On the morning of 9/11. NORAD picked up energy displacement on radar that looked like a ICBM. These missile are too fast for NORAD to shoot down and often they fly below radar. Which is why they use energy displacement to see them. That morning, they are on record speaking about "something coming."Look how cavalier Porter Gross is as you can ear the Pentagon being attacked.As you can hear he tells reporters that "THEY" had always considered airplanes flying into America Buildings. Later that day both GWB and Rice went public saying, "we never ever, in my administration, or anyone else, thought they'd fly planes into buildings."Anyway, that's all. Love to hear your thoughts. Is this Cheney connection to Kersk Sub sinking and salvage and missing P-700's just in time for September 2001 intriguing or nah?AAC