None of these definitions matter. At all. And neither if the woman is okay with it. It doesn't matter to them. Because everyone participating in that weird stuff that derived from the whole #MeToo thing going on is assuming that kissing someone in their sleep is universally wrong. Which it isn't. You might have a partner you're in a relationship with for some time and you spontaneously kiss them in their sleep because they look cute while asleep and because you know they don't mind it. Then it isn't wrong, because your partner is ok with it.

You might be the prince in "Snow White" and kiss Snow White awake, because you know she's under a curse and will die if you don't. Then it isn't wrong, because you saved her life. And, last thing I recall about this fairy tale, Snow White was pretty happy about that. She knew it was done for the morally right reasons, so not only did she have no reason to protest against it, but was also glad and thankful the prince saved her life.

Yet, those who are part of this movement vilify everything that happens without having asked for permission first and call it "abuse" or "harassment", whether that is true or not, because they don't grasp the difference. That's what's riling me up. I am not defending actual abuse or harassment, but I find myself more than just rolling my eyes at it when everything is classified as such vile things by people who are either paranoid, too stupid to know the difference or just like to see the world (or, you know, MEN) burn.









Besides, my main point here, that you overlooked, was how that stupid logic is even applied to renowned, classical works of literature and how the comic here jumps on that bandwagon, because Fluttershy's and Prince Rutherford's lines are clear references to that fairy tale. I bet everyone who complains about Snow White being kissed awake by a prince has never really heard that fairy tale before and simply jumps straight to judgement mode with red-glowing eyes because all they know about it is "There is that woman who got kissed in her sleep without consent, so that fairy tale is so wrong!" and that's where they don't care about the actual story anymore. Finest behavior by them to reveal they fail to grasp the most easy concepts of morality and rather twist everything according to their own products of paranoia and an intense desire for judgement.



And the way you use the term "moral" here falls exactly into that. Morals aren't relative. And neither subjective. MLP: FiM has morals, yes, but this isn't a moral here in this comic. It's just fuel for the fire of a movement of people who don't properly grasp what sexual harassment is and where that definition should be applied. We don't need this in a pony comic that is supposed to be innocent, funny entertainment and not an instrument of social justice. Excusing that with moral relativism won't help.

