The document has even listed some of the tweets that got the plaintiffs blocked. For instance, one of the plaintiffs replied "To be fair you didn't win the WH: Russia won it for you" to the president's tweet that said "Sorry folks, but if I would have relied on the Fake News of CNN, NBC, ABC, CBS washpost or nytimes, I would have had ZERO chance winning WH." It has also revealed that White House Social Media Director Dan Scavino sometimes tweets on the president's behalf.

The administration argues that the @RealDonaldTrump is a personal account, so the plaintiffs can't invoke their First Amendment right. Since Trump used it in the past to announce government news and policy decisions, though, the group believes the administration's decision not to contest the lawsuit will help its case. Knight Institute executive director Jameel Jaffer explained that "The White House's concessions here amount to an acknowledgment that the president and his aides have engaged in viewpoint discrimination in violation of the First Amendment."