Postcapitalist constructive theory and precapitalist theory

Helmut F. E. Tilton



Department of Gender Politics, Cambridge University





1. Expressions of defining characteristic

In the works of Gaiman, a predominant concept is the distinction between

masculine and feminine. The subject is contextualised into a precapitalist

theory that includes consciousness as a paradox. Therefore, Sartre’s analysis

of the pretextual paradigm of discourse states that narrativity serves to

entrench sexism.

Baudrillard promotes the use of postcapitalist constructive theory to

deconstruct the status quo. Thus, the subject is interpolated into a capitalist

nihilism that includes reality as a reality.

If postcapitalist constructive theory holds, we have to choose between the

pretextual paradigm of discourse and neocultural materialist theory. But

Lyotard uses the term ‘precapitalist theory’ to denote the absurdity, and

eventually the economy, of preconceptual class.

2. Sartreist absurdity and cultural discourse

If one examines precapitalist theory, one is faced with a choice: either

reject subdialectic theory or conclude that the State is fundamentally used in

the service of class divisions, but only if the premise of cultural discourse

is invalid. In Stardust, Gaiman affirms postcapitalist constructive

theory; in Sandman he denies precapitalist theory. However, the cultural

paradigm of context implies that language is used to disempower the

underprivileged.

In the works of Gaiman, a predominant concept is the concept of

prematerialist reality. Parry[1] states that we have to

choose between cultural discourse and textual postcultural theory. But the

subject is contextualised into a textual libertarianism that includes culture

as a paradox.

Several discourses concerning cultural discourse exist. Thus, Lyotard

suggests the use of precapitalist theory to challenge sexual identity.

The characteristic theme of Abian’s[2] critique of

cultural discourse is not theory, as precultural libertarianism suggests, but

subtheory. However, if postcapitalist constructive theory holds, we have to

choose between precapitalist theory and textual precapitalist theory.

Lacan uses the term ‘Debordist image’ to denote the role of the artist as

writer. Thus, Lyotard promotes the use of precapitalist theory to attack

capitalism.

1. Parry, A. P. K. (1986) The

Broken Sky: Postcapitalist constructive theory in the works of Rushdie.

Loompanics

2. Abian, V. ed. (1999) Precapitalist theory and

postcapitalist constructive theory. University of Georgia Press

The essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly generated by the Postmodernism Generator. To generate another essay, follow this link.

If you liked this particular essay and would like to return to it, follow this link for a bookmarkable page.

The Postmodernism Generator was written by Andrew C. Bulhak using the Dada Engine, a system for generating random text from recursive grammars, and modified very slightly by Josh Larios (this version, anyway. There are others out there).

This installation of the Generator has delivered 26,662,321 essays since 25/Feb/2000 18:43:09 PST, when it became operational.

More detailed technical information may be found in Monash University Department of Computer Science Technical Report 96/264: “On the Simulation of Postmodernism and Mental Debility Using Recursive Transition Networks“.

More generated texts are linked to from the sidebar to the right.

If you enjoy this, you might also enjoy reading about the Social Text Affair, where NYU Physics Professor Alan Sokal’s brilliant(ly meaningless) hoax article was accepted by a cultural criticism publication.