House conservatives are fuming over the format of an upcoming interview with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein Rod RosensteinDOJ kept investigators from completing probe of Trump ties to Russia: report Five takeaways from final Senate Intel Russia report FBI officials hid copies of Russia probe documents fearing Trump interference: book MORE, saying the closed-door setup will hinder transparency.

Reps. Mark Meadows Mark Randall MeadowsAnxious Democrats amp up pressure for vote on COVID-19 aid Pelosi hopeful COVID-19 relief talks resume 'soon' The Hill's Morning Report - Sponsored by Facebook - GOP closes ranks to fill SCOTUS vacancy by November MORE (R-N.C.) and Jim Jordan James (Jim) Daniel JordanHouse panel pulls Powell into partisan battles over pandemic Sunday shows preview: Justice Ginsburg dies, sparking partisan battle over vacancy before election House passes resolution condemning anti-Asian discrimination relating to coronavirus MORE (R-Ohio), both key figures in the ultra-conservative Freedom Caucus, have criticized the logistics of Wednesday's planned sit-down with Rosenstein which will be limited to the top Republicans and Democrats on the House Judiciary and Oversight and Government Reform committees and a court reporter.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Why are we continuing to do hearings in private where we don’t have press or the American people to be the arbiter of what is fair and right?” Meadows asked on Friday, while questioning whether the interview "

will do anything to alleviate the concerns of Americans."

He added that Rosenstein “has “purposefully gone out of his way to not be transparent with the American people.”

Jordan indicated on Friday that some members plan to “push back” on the interview format, saying the setup is “completely unacceptable” because the American people will never know what was said.

Neither Jordan nor Meadows, two of President Trump Donald John TrumpSteele Dossier sub-source was subject of FBI counterintelligence probe Pelosi slams Trump executive order on pre-existing conditions: It 'isn't worth the paper it's signed on' Trump 'no longer angry' at Romney because of Supreme Court stance MORE's top allies on Capitol Hill, directly blamed Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte Robert (Bob) William GoodlatteNo documents? Hoping for legalization? Be wary of Joe Biden Press: Trump's final presidential pardon: himself USCIS chief Cuccinelli blames Paul Ryan for immigration inaction MORE (R-Va.) or Oversight Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy Harold (Trey) Watson GowdySunday shows preview: Election integrity dominates as Nov. 3 nears Tim Scott invokes Breonna Taylor, George Floyd in Trump convention speech Sunday shows preview: Republicans gear up for national convention, USPS debate continues in Washington MORE (R-S.C.) for the interview arrangement. Instead, they said the format stems from "weakness."

Goodlatte and other GOP aides pushed back on their criticism, noting that a transcript of Rosenstein's sworn-oath testimony will be made public.

"It's important to note that there is no limitation on the scope of these questions," Goodlatte told Fox News on Sunday. "We will have a court reporter present who has a security clearance, and we will have transcripts of that interview. And then we will turn that over to the intelligence community to make sure that there are no things that cannot be released the public."

Goodlatte said lawmakers will be permitted to view the classified version of the interview before an unclassified one is made public. The Virginia Republican added that he and Gowdy proposed the interview format.

A Gowdy aide said that the Oversight chairman has encouraged other lawmakers to submit questions that he can ask on Wednesday alongside Goodlatte, Rep. Jerrold Nadler (N.Y.), the top Democrat on Judiciary, and Rep. Elijah Cummings Elijah Eugene CummingsBlack GOP candidate accuses Behar of wearing black face in heated interview Overnight Health Care: US won't join global coronavirus vaccine initiative | Federal panel lays out initial priorities for COVID-19 vaccine distribution | NIH panel: 'Insufficient data' to show treatment touted by Trump works House Oversight Democrats to subpoena AbbVie in drug pricing probe MORE (D-Md.), the ranking member on Oversight.

Freedom Caucus members called for Rosenstein, the top DOJ official overseeing special counsel Robert Mueller Robert (Bob) MuellerCNN's Toobin warns McCabe is in 'perilous condition' with emboldened Trump CNN anchor rips Trump over Stone while evoking Clinton-Lynch tarmac meeting The Hill's 12:30 Report: New Hampshire fallout MORE’s Russia investigation, to be subpoenaed after plans for him to be interviewed by the two committees earlier this month fell through for reasons that are unclear.

Before the initial meeting was postponed, Meadows told The Hill that only joint task force members — a select group of Republican lawmakers on the two committees that include Meadows and Jordan — would be interviewing Rosenstein behind closed-doors, an arrangement that appeared acceptable to conservative lawmakers.

Conservative lawmakers have been eager grill Rosenstein, even before a bombshell New York Times article last month said he had considered wearing a wire to record Trump after the president fired former FBI Director James Comey James Brien ComeySteele Dossier sub-source was subject of FBI counterintelligence probe Judge will not dismiss McCabe's case against DOJ Democrats fear Russia interference could spoil bid to retake Senate MORE in May 2017.

The Times story also said Rosenstein had discussed the possibility of Cabinet officials invoking the 25th Amendment to remove Trump from office.

Rosenstein and the Justice Department disputed the story, while some news outlets reported that he made the suggestions in jest.

Trump later said he had no plans to fire Rosenstein.

Despite the president’s recent assurances that Rosenstein is safe, Republicans continue to chatter that Rosenstein and Attorney General Jeff Sessions Jefferson (Jeff) Beauregard SessionsRoy Moore sues Alabama over COVID-19 restrictions GOP set to release controversial Biden report Trump's policies on refugees are as simple as ABCs MORE — who recused himself from the Russia probe — will be out after the midterm elections.

Democrats have warned Trump not to fire Rosenstein and other top officials tied to the Mueller probe, saying that doing so would lead to a “constitutional crisis.”