House Democrats are struggling to show a united front as the shocking ouster of their Caucus chairman rekindles tensions about the future of the party — and who is best suited to lead it into the crucial 2020 cycle.

Energized by the constant turmoil surrounding the Trump administration, Democrats of all stripes are bullish about their chances of flipping the House in this year's midterm elections. And the last thing they want is a nasty internal leadership fight heading into November.

Yet last month's stunning primary defeat of Rep. Joseph Crowley (N.Y.), the Democratic chairman, to a young liberal activist with no political experience, has created an unexpected void in the higher ranks of the party; injected new life into the longstanding campaign for fresher faces at the leadership table; and sparked a renewed interest in insurgent challenges to the current party brass.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It was a shock to everyone,” said Rep. John Yarmuth John Allen YarmuthPelosi, Democrats unveil bills to rein in alleged White House abuses of power GOP, White House struggle to unite behind COVID-19 relief House seeks ways to honor John Lewis MORE (D-Ky.), “and that shock lasted about three or four minutes before everyone started plotting.”

The shake-up has transcended thoughts of merely replacing Crowley as Caucus chairman, as some Democrats are now weighing runs at the very top of the party, where Reps. Nancy Pelosi Nancy PelosiHoyer: House should vote on COVID-19 aid — with or without a bipartisan deal Ruth Bader Ginsburg lies in repose at Supreme Court McCarthy threatens motion to oust Pelosi if she moves forward with impeachment MORE (Calif.), Steny Hoyer Steny Hamilton HoyerOVERNIGHT ENERGY: California seeks to sell only electric cars by 2035 | EPA threatens to close New York City office after Trump threats to 'anarchist' cities | House energy package sparks criticism from left and right House energy package sparks criticism from left and right Hoyer: House should vote on COVID-19 aid — with or without a bipartisan deal MORE (Md.) and James Clyburn (S.C.) have reigned for a dozen years.

Rep. Tim Ryan Timothy (Tim) RyanNow's the time to make 'Social Emotional Learning' a national priority Mourners gather outside Supreme Court after passing of Ruth Bader Ginsburg Lincoln Project hits Trump for criticizing Goodyear, 'an American company' MORE (D-Ohio), who challenged Pelosi unsuccessfully after the 2016 elections, had previously ruled out another attempt this year. With Crowley’s loss, he’s now rethinking his options.

“I got a lot of calls from members, I got a lot of calls from activists … and donors from around the country. So I think there’s some interest in re-evaluating things at this point,” Ryan told The Hill, without committing to a challenge. “It’s certainly got everybody talking, because a lot of people were of the mindset that Joe was going to be the person moving forward that had a lot of support in the Caucus.

“Now that’s all being shook up.”

Highlighting the discontent among some newer Democrats, Rep. Linda Sánchez (D-Calif.), the vice chairman of the Caucus, is amplifying her previous calls for an overhaul of the top three leaders next year, citing a desire for younger lawmakers with fresh ideas to take the reins of the party.

“I think it’s time for that generational change,” Sánchez told reporters Wednesday on Capitol Hill.

Sánchez, 49, declined to say whether she’ll seek to replace Crowley as Caucus chairman, but made clear she’s hoping to climb up the leadership ladder whenever the opportunity arises.

“Whether there’s transition or not [next year] remains to be seen,” she said. “I want to be part of that transition, because I don’t intend to stay in Congress until I’m in my 70s.”

The comments prompted an immediate repudiation from the office of the 78-year-old Pelosi, which issued a one-sentence statement warning that internal divisions will only hurt the Democrats at the polls in November.

“House Democrats are focused on winning in November and if you are rowing in the opposite direction, you are only helping Republicans,” Pelosi spokesman Drew Hammill said in an email.

The back-and-forth is exactly the type of internal sniping that Democrats are scrambling to avoid heading into the elections, and most Democrats are being highly cautious in their approach to the leadership question. Democrats should focus first on winning back the House in November, these voices argue, and dive into the leadership debate after the dust has cleared.

“With Crowley being gone, it creates a vacuum and people are going to move to fill it,” said Rep. Peter Welch Peter Francis WelchShakespeare Theatre Company goes virtual for 'Will on the Hill...or Won't They?' Vermont Rep. Peter Welch easily wins primary Vermont has a chance to show how bipartisanship can tackle systemic racism MORE (D-Vt.). “[But] in my view, we should spend a lot less time in the next several months focusing on the leadership speculation.”

Rep. Gerry Connolly Gerald (Gerry) Edward ConnollyJudge issues nationwide injunction against Postal Service changes House panel advances bill to ban Postal Service leaders from holding political positions Shakespeare Theatre Company goes virtual for 'Will on the Hill...or Won't They?' MORE (D-Va.) echoed that message, saying the leadership debate has been limited to “subterranean conversations” for that very reason.

“Those conversations are muted, largely because most of my colleagues in the caucus really are focused on the main thing, which is not the leadership race, it is ensuring that we win the majority,” he said.

“If we win the majority, everything’s on the table.”

For all the talk of Crowley’s defeat, it’s done nothing to alter the most significant — and unknowable — factor likely to dictate the Democrats’ leadership team next year: namely, the outcome of November’s midterms.

In conversations with more than a dozen Democratic lawmakers and aides, the common sentiment is that Pelosi’s future in Congress will depend on whether she can steer the Democrats into the majority, as she did in 2006 — and by how many seats. Clyburn, for one, has already asserted that a failure to win back the gavel after eight years in the minority wilderness would mean he, Pelosi and Hoyer should all step aside.

“It all still hinges on Pelosi. If she stays, everybody stays. If she’s got to go, I think most people think everybody’s got to go,” said a Democratic aide. “In that respect nothing’s changed.”

Aside from Sánchez and Ryan, Rep. Barbara Lee Barbara Jean LeeOvernight Defense: Pentagon redirects pandemic funding to defense contractors | US planning for full Afghanistan withdrawal by May | Anti-Trump GOP group puts ads in military papers Democrats call for investigation into Pentagon redirecting COVID-19 funds Steph, Ayesha Curry to be recognized by the Congressional Hunger Center MORE (D-Calif.) is also exploring a run at leadership next year. Lee, 71, a former head of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC), had lost a narrow contest to Sánchez for vice chairman and now has her eyes on Crowley’s spot.

For openly discussing her intentions, Lee is an anomaly among the Democrats. Yet numerous sources said the absence of public debate is no indication that lawmakers aren’t working the phones behind the scenes to position themselves for a leadership run, just in case the opportunity emerges.

“I would assume that anybody from Linda Sánchez down on the leadership rung, … if they’re not making calls now, are thinking about how to proceed pretty quickly here,” said the Democratic aide.