The Grizzlies head home to Memphis looking to dig themselves out of a 2-0 hole. Will the San Antonio Spurs give up any ground? We weigh in on the big questions of the series heading into Saturday's Game 3 at the Grindhouse.

1. Is Tim Duncan better than Marc Gasol?

Kevin Arnovitz, ESPN.com: Duncan was the most productive two-way big man in the league this season, at 37 years old. He scored more points per 48 minutes than he has in eight seasons and had his best rebounding season of the past five. Gasol isn't far from claiming the mantle -- and might already be there defensively -- but he needs to hunt shots more aggressively, especially when things get gummy on the offensive end for Memphis.

Chip Crain, 3 Shades of Blue: Yes. Duncan is one of the top 50 players in NBA history; Gasol has had a great season. If you need someone to play 40-plus minutes and carry the team at the defensive end, I'd take Gasol. But Duncan is better for the first 40 minutes.

Andrew McNeill, 48 Minutes of Hell: Yes. Although Gasol rightfully received the Defensive Player of the Year award, Duncan was the better two-way player this season. Duncan averaged more points, rebounds and blocks per game, and his PER was almost five points higher. This while anchoring a defense that finished just one spot behind Gasol's in defensive efficiency.

Danny Nowell, Portland Roundball Soc.: No. Duncan's first-team All-NBA selection was a legacy call, and I'm fine with that, but Gasol is the better player at this moment. And that's no knock on Timmy, as I think Gasol is currently the world's best center. Or, "power forward," if we're indulging Duncan.

Darius Soriano, Forum Blue and Gold: No, give me Marc Gasol. Duncan has aged like fine wine, but Gasol's the better defensive player and is just as skilled offensively (even though he's not the post player Duncan is).

2. Who is the most disappointing Grizzly so far?