And I will not merely suggest that this is precisely because they tend to discard organisms in their models and foci.

That’s about the most egregious mistake we could make.

Of course, it is nefariously common to overlook the seeker in the theories, models and equations, and, basically we had to be forced not to before we would even consider anything else, because, firstly, it seemed absurd to include the organism in the equation — and, secondly, the organism is such an unthinkably bizarre and sophisticated event situation that it’s almost impossible to get any formal handle on the beast.

1.61619926 × 10-35 meters

But these researchers, mathematicians, physicists and pioneers do have one small insight in their favor: they are absolutely clear about the fact that extremely tiny things behave and relate in unimaginably strange ways and have truly bizarre features of identity, location, ‘speed’ and ‘function’.

Follow my breadcrumbs here... suppose we are confused in the following way: the smaller something is, the more of the entire structure, history, identity and activity of the whole universe is crammed into it. And, further, the smaller it is, the more ways this is or tends to become true.

You did notice that life forms tend to have shorter lifespans at smaller sizes, yes? And that this might mean something we have not properly understood? Good. Stay with me. In the progression of objects (and thus organisms) toward the minute… variables that had a certain value or meaning at one order of size, often acquire other meanings and values as they shrink.