J. Briggs Myers took as a basis a typology of Jung and introduced the 16 psychological types. Myers-Briggs types are defined as a combination of a receivingfunctions (intuitionor sensation) with one of the judgingfunctions (thinking or feeling). Let note that the termshave been replaced by the terms. As a result, a simple combination of functions with theoccurs 16 types. However, there is a definite difference in the method of removing these types. J. Briggs Myers introduced the concept ofandprocesses. If a person is dominated by the processis an additional process, and conversely, if the dominant process -, the additional process - perceiving. According to Myers-Briggs, "the dominant process is concentrated in the outer world of people and events, and an additional process has to take care of their inner life, without which were extroverts I would be extremely extroverted, and, according to them better balanced colleagues - superficial." In introverts "dominant process is absorbed by the inner world of thought, and an additional process It is doing everything it can, in relation to their external life. " However, the "introverts are forced to use dominant process in relation to the external world is slightly larger than necessary, due to predictable results. "J. Briggs Myers compares the dominant process with the General, and the additional - with Adjutant. In general extrovert it is outside the tent and decides all questions, communicates with people. Adjutant is in the background or in a tent. In general introvert "is inside the tent, treating issues of highest priority. " It communicates with the outside world adjutant. Note that this idea J. Briggs Myers and the dominant role of additional processes It looks a bit strange in the case of extroverted not quite clear as an additional process in extroverts.As a result of this distinction arises 8 extraverted types and 8 introverted. It is assumed that the dominant process is always connected withoutside world and indicates - preference. Fororin their type designation It represents an additional process as introverts, according to J. Briggs Myers, do not use dominant process to communicate with the outside world.We emphasize thatFor example, considertype of CG Jung in compared to the Myers-Briggs typology. The function. If we accept an additional function as a function of, in this type of letter symbols can be written as follows:For the extraverted thinking type with auxiliary intuition record looks as follows:By I. Briggs-Myers these types are written asor, respectively. If the concept of rationalityand-preferences and the notion of irrationalityand-preferences respectively, the same, the recording encoding type for Jung and Myers-Briggs are the same.For thetype, defined by Jung(main function -- rational), the record will be as follows:a) If the auxiliary functionb) if the auxiliary function, theAccording to Myers-Briggs record is as follows:a)b)Get the paradoxical result: on the Myers-Briggs with the dominant introverted types judging function are perceived or irrational in terms of Jung. Contradiction there. Myers-Briggs types do not match the encoding of the types of CG Jung.What type of Jung corresponds to the acronymMyers-Briggs typology? Obviously, if we take as a priority indication-predpochtenie, the desired type of Jung willtype withas a subsidiary process, namelyTo verify this assertion, it suffices to compare the description of introverted Jungian types with descriptions of American typology, for example, in D. Kersi.Absolutely obvious, that by committing replacement crisp and clear sign Jungown terms, J. Briggs Myers was in captivity semantics of these terms, which differs from the semantics of terms Jung (see Note 1). Thus, in the interpretation of the American typology there is a serious disagreement with Jung (Socionics) in understanding the essence of the primary and secondary processes. The main function Jung's introverted type is interpreted I. Briggs Myers as an auxiliary. So Jungiantype with an auxiliary functionempirically, the description matches the type inMyers-Briggs typology calledtype with the dominantfunctionand support functions(Note 1: This is true for types of left social progress (in terms of socionics). Briggs Type I. Meyers described as :t::eIEI).)What kind of function is actually dominant in this type? From point of view Jungian typology and socionics - aorfunction. From the viewpoint of typology Myers-Briggs- just a helper function.It should again be emphasized that the practice of using semantics and description of the signs inAmerican typology actually match the description attributein Jung, who, in turn, is actively used in socionics. Therefore, all statements that sign J-P describes "something else", it should be recognized erroneous and unfounded.Why did we have identified a discrepancy was not noticed before? Apparently it happened because of the terminological ambiguities of both the works of Jung, and (increasingly) of his followers, which, being more psychoanalysts often confuse leadership and support functions have type. A striking example of this - the description "with the types of parties" where sotsionike easy to detect inconsistencies in description introverted types and their relationships with extroverted types. So, given the right descriptiontype with auxiliary functionand his wife as thetype, as well as their relations as(To use the concept of socionics). However, that such a couple is in a relationshipeach other, the spousetype with auxiliaryto betypewith the auxiliary. Otherwise - incompatible types (such relations are relations in socionics). Next, thetype, and indicated that his wife -type (which corresponds precisely sotsionike). Apparently the author "Parties to the types of" describing the two couples with similar nature of the relationship, admits confusion in the description and notation types.Examples can be continued.Thus, D. Kersi, developing ideas J. Briggs Myers offered the best combination of psychological types. This, according to him, those who have all the qualities of the opposite, for example, INTP and ESFJ. From the point of Kersi logical view of all - the extreme should converge. But in terms of Jung's typology (and sotsioniki) talking about irrational introverted intuitive type with an auxiliary thinking (installation of consciousness), with the installation of an archaic unconscious as extroverted sensation of feeling with the auxiliary. It is clear that this type is best suited irrational extroverted sensing type with an auxiliary function of feeling (Installation of consciousness) and introverted archaic setting with the function of the unconscious intuition and auxiliary thinking. And it does not fit a rational extraverted feeling type with auxiliary sensation. This follows from the fact that irrational and rational style life is very different, and in this particular case, these general types are not compatible or conflicts.The development of these ideas leads to unique ideas of socionics.