Jay Shah’s counsel senior advocate S.V. Raju could not be present in the court as he was busy in the Gujarat High Court.

A metropolitan court in Ahmedabad on October 11 adjourned the hearing of a criminal defamation case filed by BJP president Amit Shah’s son Jay Shah against news portal The Wire, as the complainant’s advocate was not present in the court.

A lawyer for Mr. Jay Shah sought time from Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate S.K. Gadhvi, saying senior advocate S.V. Raju could not be present in the court as he was busy in the Gujarat High Court. The court granted the time and adjourned the hearing to October 16.

Mr. Jay Shah filed the case on October 9 over a report, which claimed that the turnover of his firm, Temple Enterprise, grew exponentially after the BJP came to power at the Centre in 2014. The magistrate had ordered a court inquiry in the matter under CrPC section 202 (to inquire into the case to decide whether or not there is sufficient ground for proceeding).

In his application, Mr. Jay Shah prayed for “criminal action against the respondents for defaming and tarnishing the reputation of the complainant through an article, which is scandalous, frivolous, misleading, derogatory, libellous and consisting of several defamatory statements”.

Also Read How can government counsel defend Jay Shah, asks Congress

The seven respondents in the case are — the author of the article, Rohini Singh; founding editors of the news portal, Siddarth Varadarajan, Sidharth Bhatia and M.K. Venu; managing editor Monobina Gupta; public editor Pamela Philipose and Foundation for Independent Journalism, a non-profit company that publishes The Wire.

The case seeks action against respondents under IPC sections 500 (defamation), 109 (abetment), 39 (voluntarily causing grievous hurt) and 120 B (criminal conspiracy).

Mr. Jay Shah said the news portal first published an article, which was later “edited and reworded” to the current form. “The accused conspired to get a fabricated, reworded and edited version of the defamatory article to be published in place of the original version.”

Also Read How can government counsel defend Jay Shah, asks Congress

Mr. Jay Shah alleged that there was a “predetermined conspiracy hatched to defame” him. He said he was given “unreasonable time to respond” and no further inquiry based on his response was made.

He said the article did not reflect the loss that his company incurred in FY 2015-16, and that the net profit and gross turnover for the said financial year was “wilfully and mala fidely” delinked into two different unconnected paragraphs.

The court is of the opinion that it will issue summonses to the respondents only after the initial inquiry establishes a case. Mr. Jay Shah is yet to file a civil defamation suit against the respondents. He had announced that he will also file a ₹100 crore civil defamation suit.