Of the many reactions from Singaporeans, most simply think it’s a quirky change to our Singapore skyline, although they don’t immediately link the alteration to a deeper meaning.

“I feel very little emotional connection to Raffles. I think if someone did the same to a statue of Lee Kuan Yew, I would have a stronger reaction. But Raffles was just a figure in my history textbook who has never reappeared in my life or consciousness,” says 29-year-old Clara.

“Sure, I can read something into it if I had to, but I wouldn’t say I see it and automatically think it has meaning.”

Similarly, another Singaporean, Anne, didn’t even notice anything was different at first. Though she likes the illusion and aesthetics, she doesn’t think there’s any broader significance.

Then there’s the shock. After all, any tourist planning on taking a selfie with Raffles today would be sorely disappointed by not getting their travel dollars worth; perhaps a day at the museum would suffice.

Malaysian couple, Azhan and Juraida, say, “We were shocked to see that it wasn’t white as we expected. It’s a historic icon after all. We still prefer the original.”

On the other hand, Christian, who’s from the UK, appreciates the unexpected artistic flair of the Raffles statue ‘fading’ into the background.

“The pedestal and plaques appear classical, whereas the artwork looks modern. To me, I see a merger of the old and new, of Raffles ‘merging’ into Singapore. I don’t see it as an erasure of his existence or a sign of being invisible,” he shares.

Otherwise, there is mostly bemusement. A few reckon it’s merely a prank or publicity stunt.

“Honestly, I never was a fan of the statue. The idea that we glorify the coloniser never sat well with me,” quips Jessica, a fellow Singaporean.

Whatever the case, the message is loud and clear.