Each week, readers are invited to submit questions about the Green Bay Packers via Twitter using the hashtag #PackersMail. Here are the best from this week:

@RobDemovsky #packersmail what do you think the chances are the pack will keep both James Starks and Eddie Lacy long term? — Dan B (@inkyfingers13) November 7, 2014

@RobDemovsky #PackersMail Is DuJuan Harris's days numbered? Seems that MM cant get him in the offense & he hasnt shown a lot on ST. — Michael Klinck (@MichaelKlinck) November 7, 2014

@RobDemovsky Will the Pack keep getting Davante Adams more and more involved down the stretch? #PackersMail — Dan P (@dan19790) November 7, 2014

@RobDemovsky is a London home game more detrimental to the Packers then other teams because they are more dependent on revenue #PackersMail — Jonathan Roe (@Jondrea) November 7, 2014

: That depends on what you mean by long term. James Starks is under contract through 2015, and Eddie Lacy is signed through 2016. Right now, they look like a good combination. But how many running backs do three contracts with the same team? That would be Starks if he did another deal after this one. By the time he's a free agent again, he will have just turned 30. The Packers appear to be preserving Lacy by limiting his carries this season. That suggests they want to keep him around for more than just one contract, but the shelf life for running backs is so short that at this point nothing's guaranteed. Lacy runs so hard and takes on so much contact that you wonder what he'll be like after four seasons.: It just goes to show you how things change in the NFL. Heading into last season, coach Mike McCarthy kept insisting that DuJuan Harris was his starting running back. He looked so promising after the 2012 season. Even after the Packers drafted Lacy, he and Harris were supposed to be the 1-2 punch until injuries hit Harris. At this point, Harris is well behind Starks and Lacy on the depth chart and even fullback John Kuhn has more carries (10) than Harris (eight). Harris also hasn't wowed anyone on kickoff returns.: That's a good bet. For starters, Davante Adams has moved well ahead of Jarrett Boykin for the No. 3 receiver spot. Put it you this way: Teams aren't going to start paying less attention to Jordy Nelson and Randall Cobb . They would rather try to make a guy like Adams beat them. About the only thing that could reduce the number of targets headed Adams' way is if one of their tight ends somehow became productive. But based on the first half of the season, that seems unlikely. Adams' workload should increase.: Well, it's more detrimental to the city of Green Bay than it probably would be to the Packers' organization because they would get a cut of the ticket revenue no matter where the game was played. Out of deference to the city and Northeast Wisconsin area, which depends so heavily on the eight home games a season, the Packers would never agree to give up a home game to play overseas, and the NFL isn't likely to make them do so, either. So don't worry, it's not going to happen. If the Packers play in London, which team president Mark Murphy seems to think they will at some point soon, they will be the road team.