I read on page 13 of today’s The Times of India (TOI) the reporting of the hearing of my petition in the Supreme Court challenging the resolutions of Parliament relating to my comments on Gandhi and Bose. The news item mentions that my petition was turned down. This is factually incorrect. There were no doubt some tentative observations by the bench, but ultimately the hearing of the petition was adjourned by two weeks. This fact has not been mentioned in the news item, nor the fact that Mr. Fali Nariman has been appointed amicus curiae, and the Attorney General has also been asked to appear on the next date. This makes the news reporting totally misleading, as if the petition was dismissed…If the petition had been dismissed, why was the case adjourned, and why were Fali Nariman and the Attorney General asked to express their views on the matter on the next date? Is this not contradictory?