This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

(As some people noticed, I've been pretty quiet for several weeksnow, being overwhelmed with stuff other than putting out anti-political rantings. So I feel the need to do a little fire-breathing now, to let off some steam, after spending too longquietly listening to the authoritarian, slave-speak tripecontinually spewed out by the mainstream media.)I have a message for all the conservative Republicans out there,sick of all the paternalistic, nanny-state, socialist garbage thatthe Obama regime has been pushing--the wealth redistribution, theattempts to nationalize various industries, the liberal tax andspend agenda, etc. My message to all the conservative Republicansout there who are upset by the way things are going, is this:Serves you right, you unprincipled, hypocritical boneheads.(As you can see, my break didn't make me any more moderate, or anymore polite.)No, it's not that I support Obama and his collectivist agenda. It'sthat I don't support his collectivist agenda or YOUR collectivistagenda. In fact, in principle I don't see a shred of differencebetween the agenda of the "R" megalomaniacal parasites and the "D"megalomaniacal parasites. If you're a loyal Republican, you're notactually against wealth redistribution, or nationalizing industry,or trashing the Constitution--you just want YOUR narcissisticcrooks to be the ones doing it.You think it's horrible for "government" to rob productive people,to give money to those who didn't earn it? Yeah, me too. But topretend to be principled when whining about having to fund coercedpseudo-charity, only to then turn around and advocate that peoplebe forced to fund mass murder instead (in the name of "nationalsecurity"), is the height of hypocrisy. In short, your Democratneighbors are merely doing to you what you want to do to them:using the violence of the state to coerce you into supporting theirbeliefs and values.If you vote to rob your neighbor, and your neighbor votes to robyou, and you happen to lose the contest of control-freakism, youdamn well deserve it. If you whine that you're being forced to funda welfare state you oppose, and then you turn around and try toforce others to fund a military empire they oppose, then you're acoward and a hypocrite, and you don't deserve freedom. (Is thatblunt enough?) If those of you fighting over which slave-mastershould own us all--Republican or Democrat--were the only onesvictimized by the statist game, I wouldn't really care. But thosefew of us who actually like freedom (we're the ones that get called"extremists") are forced to support both of the stupid statistagendas.If you complain about Obama trashing the Constitution, yet yousupport the fascist, draconian "war on drugs" (as you swig yourbeer), then you deserve the Obama administration. If you complainabout the nanny state doing their paramilitary thuggery againstproducers of raw milk, organic produce, guitars (yes, guitars),lemonade stands, and so on, and yet you support what the ICE, DHS,TSA, and other jackboots are doing every day in the name of"security," then you're a two-faced twit.In short, if you refuse to allow your neighbors--all six billion ofthem--to live in freedom, then you yourself deserve to be enslaved.Republicans are not for freedom, any more than Democrats are.Neither group of state-worshipers even understands what freedom is.They accept a violent ruling class as a necessary and legitimatething, and then they bicker over the meaningless details. Insteadof opposing mass extortion in principle, they argue about whoshould receive the loot. They don't oppose intrusive oppression inprinciple; they just want it used in a way that fits their ownbeliefs and values.If you want me to be forced to fund your views--and if you voteRepublican or Democrat, then you do--then your values suck. Youdon't love freedom or justice, or even know what those words mean.You're nothing more than whiny slaves, asking the "massuh" to whipthe other slaves harder, and make the other slaves work longerhours. There's nothing noble or righteous about that.The Republican party isn't against socialism, or wealthredistribution. Where are the "R" politicians who dare to call forending coercive wealth redistribution, by ENDING Social Security,Medicare, Medicaid, AFDC, and so on? Saying that you want to slowthe rate of growth of something is not the same as opposingsomething in principle! (Duh.) With the exception of Ron Paul, allof the Republicans in Congress combined don't have enough vertebraeamongst them to put together one spine. There is not one principleto be found on which the Republican and Democratic establishmentsdisagree. Not one.Wanting "lower taxes" means wanting LESS robbery. How about NOrobbery? Where is the Republican proposing that? (Not even Ron Pauladvocates that.) Cutting back, or at least slowing down, wealthredistribution schemes is not the same as opposing coercive wealthredistribution in principle. Where is the Republican who will say,"Stealing from one to give to another is wrong"? Wanting toforcibly meddle with some non-violent choices, and not others, isnot principled. Whining about the nanny state, while supporting theDEA and ATF, is the sign of an unprincipled doofus. Whining aboutcertain examples of war-mongering, while defending others--whichboth parties do--is a pretty glaring example of how unprincipledmost Americans are. This may come as a shock to you voters, butadvocating violent aggression, terrorism and mass murder is alwaysbad, whether it's done by your party or by the other one.All the talking heads out there, vehemently condemning one set ofcontrol freaks, while acting as apologists for another, are adisgrace. The viewpoints portrayed in the media as the "far left"and the "far right" of the political spectrum are, in principle,the same thing. The state-approved drivel that is vomited out oftelevisions and radios across the country has two very slightlydifferent flavors, and no principles whatsoever.Allow me to put this in terms that a kindergartner (and hopefullyeven an American voter) can comprehend: If you continually vote forliars and crooks to infringe upon the freedom of your neighbors,then you do not deserve, and will not have, freedom yourself. Infact, there is only one group that is out here, not only advocatingthat WE be free, but advocating that YOU be free, too. And we'rethe ones you love to hate, because we don't worship the state asyou do. We are proudly and unapologetically anti-"government,"because "government" is always anti-freedom, anti-justice and anti-human.Incidentally, if you ever decide to get a principle, we'd love foryou to join us. In the meantime, we'll just be annoyed that youcontinue to imagine yourselves to be rational and moral, while youbeg for the mercenaries of the state to foist your bad ideas on us.Then you whine when others do the same thing to you. Get aprinciple, and give up your statism. Grow up, and act like athinking, responsible human being. Then you can be one of those"fringe, kook, extremist anarchists" that the media so thoroughlydespises. (We even make Ron Paul look like a moderate ... becausehe is.)Larken Rose