This week we take a break from

the serialization of Sacred Economics: Money, Gift and Society in the Age of

Transition to present an article inspired by the recent anniversary of 9/11. We will

resume with Chapter 11 of Sacred Economics next Thursday.





Looking out upon the horrid

ruin we seem to have made of the planet, in spite of the kind hearts and good

intentions of the vast majority of human beings, it is hard to avoid the

conclusion that some nefarious force has hijacked civilization, driving it

towards ends that serve almost no one.

If we are headed for a future

that no one would consciously choose, it stands to reason, some say, that we

are not choosing; that something else, unfriendly to human welfare, is

choosing for us.

Deeper study of certain pivotal

events in history strengthens this conclusion. The official explanations of the

Kennedy assassination or 9/11 are riddled with contradictions that are

difficult to explain. Ominous coincidences pile up and make patterns, pointing

toward a conscious agency orchestrating these events toward sinister goals.

Diving deeper, one discovers patterns of patterns that ultimately coalesce into

an alternate history of the world.

The alternate history explains

world events as resulting from the machinations of a powerful, dark cabal of

secret organizations comprising the global elite: the banks, wealthy families

like the Rockefellers and Rothschilds, non-official organizations like the

Bilderburg Council, organized crime, shadowy agencies within the government,

secret societies like Skull and Bones and the Freemasons, and so on. Behind

them all is a group even more secret, comprising the true rulers of earth, who

count even prime ministers and presidents among their puppets. Some theorist

say that these Illuminati who hold the reins of power are human beings; others

say that they have extraterrestrial allies, or that this group is controlled

by, or consists of, ETs. Their goal, it is said, is to impose a New World Order

(NWO) in which their dominion is complete.

In addition, the dark cabal

that rules the earth is purported to have powerful secret technologies at its

disposal. Weather control, mind control, energy weapons, artificially created

diseases like Lyme and Swine Flu, and other near-magical technologies enable

them to destroy any opposition and control us in ways we barely suspect. Always

they are seeking to impose new forms of tyranny, to extend their dominion over

mind and matter.

The purpose of this essay is not

to debunk conspiracy theories or uphold the dominant historical narrative.

Rather, I will advance a third explanation that respects and transcends both.

Most critiques of conspiracy theories dispute the author's evidence, logic, and

sources, and impugn his sanity, intelligence, or integrity. I will not do that.

While such critiques often have merit, they tend to go after the low-hanging

fruit: the sloppiest authors, the weakest points of their theses, the most

easily explained of their evidence. Giving the best of the genre a fair

reading, however, the impartial reader realizes that something strange is going

on.

Moreover, the NWO conspiracy

theory, whatever its flaws, bears some important truths. For one thing, it

speaks to our sense that there is something deeply wrong in the world,

something that is right in front of our faces yet that we are too blind to see.

The NWO hypothesis feels validating and liberating. In the end, though, many

people find it to be disempowering; as I shall describe, it subtly feeds into

the mentality behind the very same conditions that it aspires to change. It

robs us of our power and helps maintain the status quo. How does this happen,

and how can its liberating potential be realized? To answer this question, let

us begin with a meta-level critique of the NWO thesis, and conspiracism in

general, a critique that opens the door toward integrating both the NWO and the

dominant narrative into a larger framework.

The Futility of Control

Are there really

ultra-intelligent, ultra-competent people on top whose plans actually work and

whose technologies actually succeed in molding the world to their plans? Or are

the elites of our civilization as confused and scared as the rest of us,

responding to events that, at every turn, take on a life of their own? The

futility of control is written into the fabric of reality. Complex non-linear

systems such as a body or a society are inherently unpredictable. Of course,

those in power try to maintain control and often wreak awful damage in so doing,

but generally speaking it is events that control them, and not the other way

around.

Conspiracy theories ascribe a

degree of competence, foresight, and efficiency to the controlling

organizations that is generally foreign to human institutions. We live in a civilization built on

control, on the idea that we can order the world through material and social

technology and, once we perfect those technologies, win the war against nature,

against disorder, against uncertainty. But in fact, the world is messy,

chaotic, and unpredictable, and no matter how tightly we attempt to orchestrate

events, control slips through our grasp like mud through a clenched fist. We

are immersed in an ideology that says that with the next technological

revolution, with next medical innovation, or the next set of comprehensive

regulations, finally we will get all the messy variables under control and live

in an orderly, secure world.

The conspiracists agree with a

defining precept of our civilization: that the world is fundamentally amenable

to control. They think that this power to control has been turned toward evil,

but do not dispute the technocratic doctrine that society and the material

world can be endlessly improved through the methods of science: gathering

information, making plans, eliminating variables, applying force, and so on. To

believe that the NWO conspiracy is even possible is to conform to one of the

primary motivating and justifying beliefs underlying totalitarianism. The NWO

believers are not as radical as they think.

We have been betrayed. After

centuries of sacrifice on the altar of technological development, we harbor a

deep disappointment and anger. We export that anger onto the Illuminati, or

whoever it is that has robbed us of The Future. Surely this technological

utopia exists – it has only been withheld from us, and the technologies of

paradise turned toward nefarious ends. But the real problem is deeper than

that. It is the paradigm of control itself that causes us to sacrifice

everything in pursuit of a mirage.

The Dynamics of Command

A staple of conspiracy theories

is the idea that "President Obama is a puppet" or that, "Even

David Rockefeller is taking orders from higher up." So let us look into

the social dynamics of hierarchies. For someone to obey orders, either the

command-giver must have direct physical power over the subordinate (for

example, a literal gun to the head), or both commander and commandee must be

embedded in a social institution that legitimizes and enforces the command. An

obvious example of the latter is the army. When a colonel gives an order to a

major, the latter obeys not because he is afraid the colonel will beat him up

if he refuses, but because both are part of a web of (mostly implicit)

agreements. Ultimately, if he doesn't comply with the order, someone

(say military police) might beat him up or imprison him, but that happens as

well because the web of agreements includes consequences for violating them. We

could say that colonel, major, military police, and the rest all share a common

"story of the army".

What about the global

conspiracy? What social institution exists that would legitimize orders issued

to David Rockefeller or Barack Obama? The story of the army is embedded in

larger legitimizing stories that ultimately encompass the legitimacy of the

government, the value of money, an interpretation of history, a system a values

and morals, and more. What infrastructure exists that would allow direct

hierarchical control over Obama or Rockefeller? Hierarchies cannot exist in a

social vacuum. They require a system of indoctrination and acculturation along

with numerous supporting institutions.

Consider, for example, the idea

that the World Trade Center towers fell due to demolition charges placed inside

the buildings by government operatives. For them to be willing to do this, they

would have to exist nearly in a separate social universe, inculcated with

values very different from those of the rest of society. Contrary to the

impression given by Hollywood movies, people don't commit acts like this out of

pure unreasoning evil. They do so in conformity to a culturally-embedded

world-view. I could see how Islamic Jihadists, inflamed by radical imams and

outraged by the devastation that American imperialism has wreaked on their society,

could hatch a plot to strike a blow at the "Great Satan". But what

would it take for American demolitions experts to commit mass murder against

their own compatriots? What would it take for you, dear reader, to do

it? What kind of alternate education, acculturation, indoctrination would you

have to go through to commit and then keep secret such an act? Who would administer this education?

How would the operation, and the whole educational and support infrastructure

around it, be kept secret from the rest of society? Are the low-paid works in

building security, or the majority of decent folks at the CIA or NSA in on it

too? Basically, for a conspiracy of this scale to exist, there would have to be

an entire parallel society hidden within our own, complete with a full set of

parallel institutions to create people with a very different culture among us.

Reread that last sentence

through a metaphoric lens for a hint of where this essay is headed.

Psychological addiction

I have noticed that conspiracy

theories have a very strong emotional appeal — at least to some people.

Believers like to think that they are impartially choosing their belief because

they are more rational, more intelligent, or more open-minded than all those

benighted, deluded "sheeple" out there. Two people look at the same

set of facts and draw different conclusions. Is that choice a function of

intelligence and reason? Or could it be that we choose interpretations to meet

psychological and emotional needs?

One indication of the emotional

appeal of conspiracy theories is their addictive nature. When I visited the

conspiracy state of being some time ago, I found myself constantly checking

certain websites, and feeling a kind of gratification at each discovery of some

new outrage. Other than that, it

was a very dark and heavy state of being that I visited, full of gloomy

cynicism and a superficial feeling of superiority that didn't even fool myself.

I've heard from people for whom this became a full-fledged addiction. They

spend hours every day reading about the machinations of the New World Order,

and go through intense withdrawal whenever they miss their

"fix".

Believers spend lots of time

getting "informed", but do they really act upon that information?

Some do, I suppose: they move to an armed compound in Idaho or hide gold coins

in their basement. But most go on with life as usual. How are they any

different from their neighbors? Their eyeballs linger over Alex Jones' website

rather than NPR's, but to what end? They may believe themselves to be among the

canny, righteous few, fighting against evil on behalf of the ignorant masses,

but mostly they do nothing. Like any addiction, addiction to conspiracy

websites or the closely related end-of-the-world websites disempowers people,

and actually helps maintain the status quo.

Belief in conspiracy theories

is not one of several emotionally coequal world-view alternatives. It is part

and parcel of an emotional, psychological, and spiritual state of being. That

state of being is a victim state. The belief that events are controlled by

malevolent people far more powerful than ourselves, that any attempt at change

is futile in the face of the tremendous powers arrayed against us, leaves no

alternative but to carve out a small, safe realm of rebellion-in-private. If

there were indeed a global conspiracy, it would be quite happy with this

result. Paradoxically, then, we might say that the idea that there is a global

conspiracy is itself a lie propagated by the global conspiracy.

Non-falsifiability

One of the most common

criticisms of conspiracy theories is that they are non-falsifiable, since any

contradictory evidence can be written off as a fabrication, a false trail, or

so forth. A conspiracy, moreover,

must be well-hidden — lack of evidence is itself evidence! What is less

frequently acknowledged is that the alternatives to conspiracy theories are

very nearly non-falsifiable as well. Anyone who comes forth to expose a

conspiracy can be labeled a fraud or a madman, and nearly anything can be written

off as coincidence. We are faced, as we are so often in life, with two

narratives that can, with perhaps a bit of stretching, account for all of the

facts. How then to choose?

Much as we would like to think

otherwise, evidence and logic cannot bring certainty. Nor, as numerous social

psychology experiments demonstrate, are they the primary determinants of our

judgments and choices. Despite the epithets hurled back and forth, neither side

of, say, the 9/11 conspiracy issue is stupid. Critics of conspiracy theories

paint their proponents as naïve, unsophisticated, and guilty of obvious

selection biases and a host of elementary errors in research and logic. I have

found such critiques unsatisfactory. They certainly apply to the worst of the

genre, but not always to the best.

Reasonable people can,

depending on their vantage point and life situation, look at the same set of

events and form different beliefs about them. These beliefs then become a

filter that determines what they see and, indeed, what they look for. It is as

if they enter separate but parallel realities. As we shall see, there is more

to this appearance than meets the eye.

The War against Evil

Among conspiracism's

psychological payoffs that it provides someone to blame, to hate, and perhaps

to fight in a world of otherwise incomprehensible injustice and horror.

Paradoxically, even though it casts us as victims of super-powerful

conspirators, it also provides a kind of control. After all, if the source of

evil in the world today is the conspirators, then the solution is quite clear:

expose and remove them. If there

is no conspiracy — if, for instance, evil is endemic to the world or an

emergent property of organizations — then we are even more helpless. Even if as

a practical matter we cannot hope to defeat the conspiracy, at least we understand

why things are the way they are. We know a solution, even if it be out of

reach.

That solution, to put it

succinctly, is to conquer evil. Conspiracism offers an external evil and

thereby exculpates us from our own complicity in the awful things happening on

earth today. We can think, "If only I were in charge, I would run things

very differently than the New World Order Illuminati, because I am a decent

person, not evil like they are."

The paradigm that sees human

affairs — and even cosmic processes — as a war between good and evil has deep

roots, originating with the first agricultural civilizations. It was then that

the concept of evil arose, mirroring the growing oppositional relationship to

nature implicit in the taming of the wild. Rather than being seen as integral

parts of the whole, such things as weeds, wolves, and locusts became threats to

human well-being and the object of extermination campaigns – campaigns that are

still with us today. The chaotic forces of nature were identified with evil,

while good was associated with the bringing of order to nature and to human

affairs. If only, someday, our control over nature and society could be

complete, the thinking goes, then good will reign on earth and suffering be

minimized or even, with nanotechnology and neuro-engineering, eliminated. Evil

will have been conquered.

When new political movements

come to power, they often bring with them the idea of eliminating evil. Whether

it is the Nazi Holocaust or the Stalinist purges, the result is usually bloody,

regardless of how evil is identified. In other words, the idea of evil begets

evil. We may add, then, a second paradox to the one above. In the war between

good and evil, a great weapon of the forces of evil is the notion that there is

a war between good and evil.

Conspiracism gives new guise to

a very old thoughtform (that the horror of our world is caused by forces of

evil) that is becoming obsolete. We can see its obsolescence both in our

changing attitudes toward nature, which no longer hold it as an object of

conquest and exploitation, and in newly ascendant spiritual beliefs that

emphasize the integration and transcendence of dualities. In social psychology

as well, a new movement called situationism contends that the totality of our

external and internalized circumstances, rather than some disposition toward

good or evil, determines our choices.

In fields as disparate as

physics, psychology, ecology, and spirituality, people are understanding that

what happens "out there" is intimately connected to what happens

"in here"; that self and world are interdependent and mutually

co-constructed. A dark conspiracy controlling world events mirrors the same

inside ourselves. When I say "ourselves" I don't mean some people and

not others and certainly not us good guys. I mean you, me, and everyone.

Herein may lie an important

truth encoded in conspiracy theories: not a factual truth, but a mythological

truth. There does seem to be a conspiracy running inside my psyche that

keeps me enslaved to fear and greed; that indeed possesses technologies of mind

control; that presents the whole world through a filter of lies; that is

associated somehow with the reptilian part of my brain; that manipulates me to

serve an agenda inimical to my authentic happiness. Everything that the

Illuminati are purported to do to the world, we do to ourselves. Could it be

that when we see an evil cabal controlling the world, we are actually seeing

the projection of our own egos?

And, because our collective

institutions mirror the prevailing psychodynamics of our time, could it be that

story of the New World Order conspiracy, despite its flaws, gives us a window

onto some important truths about our society?

The Matrix of Synchronicity

The aforementioned shortcomings

in the New World Order (NWO) hypothesis are not cause to dismiss it entirely,

for the nature of the flaws points to some deep truths. The conspiracists are

onto something, something that is actually even more radical — and far more

hopeful — than they imagine. So let us consider a riddle: If there is no

conspiracy in the normal sense, then how to explain the evidence pointing to

one? Let us not throw out the baby with the bathwater. When you look into the

Kennedy assassination, or the history of suppression of unconventional energy

technologies, or the cancer industry and the criminalization of alternative

therapies, or any number of other issues, it sure can look like a conspiracy.

If there isn't one, then we must discover some third explanation that doesn't

turn a blind eye to some very incongruous events.

You may not think there is any

such evidence. You may think that the well-documented human capacity to make

meaning and perceive patterns where none exist is sufficient to explain the

conspiracists' conclusions. After having read a fair amount of the literature

with an open mind, I find that explanation too quickly dismissive. Even

discounting the considerable selection bias that filters the evidence presented

in conspiracy books, many of the coincidences remain striking. Moreover, there

is something uncanny about the facility with which certain events lend

themselves to conspiracy hypotheses. It is as if they are begging for it; for

example, Jack Ruby killing Lee Harvey Oswald before he could talk in court

about his motive for assassinating President Kennedy. It looks like a

conspiracy. It smells like a conspiracy. But is it a conspiracy?

In the last section I suggested

that perhaps when we see conspiracies, we are seeing a reflection of something

inside ourselves, building stories and imposing patterns onto reality. But

perhaps there is more to the story: What if, in addition to predisposing us to

see patterns that aren't there, our emotions and beliefs actually attract

experiential data that fits them? What if, for example, the psychic energy

beneath conspiracism organizes events to fit into a conspiracy pattern, so that

it looks like a conspiracy even if there are no actual conspirators?

Consider some of the events

surrounding 9/11: numerous military exercises that very day that tied up and

confused a military response; blatant contradictions in official accounts in

the near aftermath of the attack; suppression of the air traffic control logs

for the flights; suppression of contradictory news broadcasts and their removal

from news site archives; the miraculously quick identification of the hijackers

despite the fact (at least according to some websites) that their names never

appeared on the passenger manifests; the subsequent anthrax attack using

anthrax from a government bioweapons lab; the 9/12 "Bin Laden

Airlift" that evacuated members of the family from the United States, and

so on. Each of these, on their own, admits to an innocent explanation. But to

say that their confluence is mere coincidence strains credibility. One is

tempted to conclude that these events must have been orchestrated somehow.

But what if they are

coincidence — but coincidence isn't what we think it is: Perhaps

coincidence is not random, but orchestrated (not by a conscious human agency)

into patterns that conform to certain belief systems and meet certain

psychological needs. As illustrated earlier, people with certain emotional or

psychological needs are attracted to conspiracy theories. Well, the reverse

might also be true: patterns of events that look like conspiracies are

attracted to needs that exist in human society. Together these form what we

might call a "matrix of synchronicity" that is grist to the

conspiracy mill.

This possibility opens up even

deeper problems, however. For one thing, it inverts traditional scientific

notions of causality, resting wholly in the realm of the Aristotelian

"final cause," the teleological explanation of, "It happened in

order that…" That a constellation of events could just happen,

without design, yet accomplish something seemingly purposive, is profoundly

disturbing to the reductionism-steeped mind. For there to be design, we think,

there must be a designer. From this perspective, conspiracism is actually not

very radical at all. While appearing to occupy opposing poles of opinion,

conspiracy believers actually agree with their conventional counterparts on a

deeper issue: that overwhelming evidence of a conspiracy means there is

probably a conspiracy. They merely disagree whether such evidence exists. My

disagreement with conspiracism is of a different sort. I accept (at least more

than the skeptics do) much of their evidence, and I accept that it looks like

events have been orchestrated by a conspiracy. But for the reasons given, I

find the New World Order myth just as unsatisfying as the conventional point of

view it merely draws specious signals from random noise.

I want to emphasize just how

radically mind-twisting the matrix-of-synchronicity explanation really is. I am

saying: "These patterns of events are drawn to history because we need

them to flesh out conspiracy theories and give expression to the psychological

energies driving those theories." It is as if events organize themselves

around some kind of field that makes them appear to have a causal linkage even

when they do not.

Shadow Realities

A second and related problem

that the matrix of synchronicity opens up is, if anything, even more deeply

challenging to our way of thinking. For here is another thing on which skeptic

and conspiracist secretly agree: that there is an objective fact-of-the-matter

as to whether a conspiracy exists. One side thinks it does and the other thinks

it doesn't, but both agree that either it does or it doesn't. Both, in other words,

agree on the doctrine of objectivity: that there is a reality out there, a set

of events that actually happened, and that while our knowledge of them may be

incomplete, the events themselves happened or did not happen independent of our

knowledge of them. It is only a matter, then, of finding out the truth, the

facts.

That both skeptic and believer

share this doctrine is unsurprising, for it lies at the very foundation of the

scientific method. We try to find out the way things really are, what really

happened. Such locutions reveal the unquestioned assumption of objectivity. But

what if this assumption is false? What if there is no independently existing

reality "out there"; what if reality is a dialogic construct between

self and other? I will not go to

deeply into the philosophic history of this idea, except to say that I am not

propounding solipsism and am well familiar with the classic refutations of it.

For the present purpose, suffice it to say that perhaps conspiracies occupy an

intermediate ontologic state, what one might call a shadow reality. They exist

in a realm less real than, say, the U.S. Congress, but more real than Batman or

Santa Claus.*

The realm in which the New

World Order (NWO) conspiracies exist has its own history, its own logic, its

own emotional complexes, its own experiences. The more one enters that belief

system, the more experience confirms it. These confirmations can be very

tangible: illness from chemtrails, sightings of black unmarked helicopters,

discoveries of unidentifiable implants, anonymous death threats, and so

forth.

I once had a conversation with

a leader in the 9-11 Truth movement, a very credible, emotionally stable,

down-to-earth woman, generous, broad-minded, intelligent, and full of good

humor. She related quite a few strange experiences that happened at the peak of

her activism. Once, she was pulled over on the highway by a squad of seven

police cars, taken into custody, and then released hours later with no charges,

no explanation, and subsequently no admission that it ever happened. She also

received a strange package in the mail filled with Russian documents. We would

like to think, either, that these events were orchestrated by some New World

Order operative as a warning, or, that she is confabulating or consciously

lying. What I'm saying here, however, is that perhaps these events were

attracted to her because she had entered quite deeply the reality in which such

things happen.

Let's take it further: What of

the secret operative? Does he

exist or doesn't he? Well, perhaps he too has a shadow existence: he exists in

the shadow reality of the NWO, but not in the broadest consensus reality. What

if the operative is, say, an insurance agent, who sometimes blacks out or is

taken over by an alternate personality and does inexplicable things like take

his grandfather's Russian papers from his attic and mails them to a random

address that just so happens to be my friend's? A leading conspiracy writer,

David Icke, comes close to saying this when he states, "…often the most

significant operatives in the Illuminati hide behind apparently 'ordinary'

lives while dictating the agenda and attending human sacrifice rituals."

Could it be that these operatives are hidden, by their ordinary lives, even

from themselves?

What if you went to ask the

police officers who pulled her over, and they claimed with all apparent

sincerity to have no memory of it. But suppose one says, "That's funny,

something you said sounds familiar – I think I had a dream about this." Then,

under hypnotic regression, he recalls just the incident the woman describes. Is

this a "real" memory? You inquire further and find that several of

the officers had a "missing time" episode that day. It seems like

they pulled the woman over and then forgot about it. Was there some conscious

agency that compelled them to do so? Or was it just a piece of the

aforementioned matrix of synchronicity?

Following such questions, we

eventually might develop doubts about what it means to say that my friend

"really" was pulled over by seven police cars. We might look at the

police record — did such an incident happen? We find no record. Of course not —

it has been expunged. But maybe we do find a record, that disappears the next

time we check. Maybe we, as investigators, get sucked down the rabbit hole: the

more we investigate, the more evidence we find, but it is only ever enough to

confirm it to ourselves, not to others. When we try to convince others, the

documents we need are unavailable, key sources mysteriously disappear or change

their story… We begin to wonder about our own sanity. We seem to be living in

a world in which the conspiracy exists for us, but not for most other people.

Yet it is not all in our heads – real things are happening to us.

It is as if the events are

happening for you, but not for me; that in one universe, the police raid really

did happen, and in another universe it did not — and both these universes

coexist on earth. Steeped in the doctrine of objectivity, we would like to

think there is a "fact of the matter", an absolute reality in which

it either did or did not happen, independent of our knowledge. But perhaps

reality is not like that. Perhaps reality is relational, co-created, and never

just "out there."

The shadowy nature of these

down-the-rabbit-hole realities comes through in certain conspiracist writings

that refer to reptilian alien races, the true puppet masters, who control the

Illuminati from the fourth dimension. This reference to the "fourth

dimension" encodes an implicit acknowledgment that these beings don't

"exist" in the three-dimensional Cartesian matrix of our

objectivity-based worldview. They occupy an intermediate state, again,

somewhere between Michael Jordan and Santa Claus.

Another clue lies in the common

NWO belief that a gigantic network of tunnels, secret bases, and entire cities

lies beneath our own, a whole parallel world. Is their existence literally

subterranean, or is it, rather, subconscious? Or neither/both? When you go

looking for them, you find them; or perhaps they come looking for you if you

are in the right psychological state. You find mysterious maps, ominous

references, eerie stories from retired Department of Energy officials. But, if

you approach the matter from a different mindset and a different state of

being, you find nothing unexplainable. The maps have other interpretations, the

former officials seem not credible. For you, there is nothing to find.

You occupy a universe in which it doesn't exist. Paradoxically, the

conspiracists and the skeptics are both right.

In most organizations I have

encountered there is a conspiracy of silence that hides the organization's true

goals. This secret, shadow organization is nearly coextensive with its visible

constituency, meaning that we are each members of the conspiracy to enslave

humanity; we are victims and perpetrators both. At one time or another, all of

us have contributed to the "reptilian agenda" of maximizing power and

control over others. This agenda has a personal and a collective dimension.

Personally, it is the egoic, even psychpathic behavior projected onto the

secret rulers of the world. Collectively, it is the propensity of

organizations, even those founded with great and sincere idealism, to succumb

eventually to the service of their own survival interest. Their stated mission

becomes an afterthought, a justification for their secret purpose of

self-preservation. Certainly on a metaphorical level, the New World Order

hypothesis is true. Follow it down the rabbit hole and it becomes not only

true, but also real.

The divergence of reality and

truth is confusing to the objectivity-steeped mind. To further confuse matters,

shadow realities can have effects on each other. It is just like a quantum

experiment in which each possible state of a particle has an effect on

an observable system, even though when a measurement is taken, the particle is

found to occupy only one of those states. In other words, the mere possibility

of it occupying a certain state has physical effects.

In a similar way, perhaps our

world occupies a superposition of states, one of which is the NWO state, and we

can see the interference effects of that state even without its being

"real". Its reality, and that of the conventional explanation as

well, is indeterminate. It is only when we begin to investigate that we

collapse the wave function and enter into one or another shadow reality.

The Mythic Truth of the New

World Order

However rational and

evidence-based we like to imagine ourselves to be, ultimately our beliefs are

founded on faith. Few readers of David Icke actually do the footwork that would

be necessary to verify his sources, and his sources' sources, many of whom,

indeed, are already dead. If the NWO conspiracists are correct, then everything

we have been told is wrong. For some, this is profoundly liberating; for

others it is deeply disturbing. The former are predisposed to believe; the

latter to reject; this predisposition then clothes itself in facts and

evidence. Thus it is that facts and evidence rarely change anyone's mind – they

are symptoms and not causes of our beliefs. It is only when life-changing

events alter one's predisposition that room becomes available for new beliefs.

Our beliefs, and the states of

being underlying them, do evolve and sometimes shift dramatically. This happens

especially when for one reason or another, one's world falls apart. Because we

live in a time of mounting crisis, the world is falling apart for more and more

people, and the unraveling of the old certainties will only accelerate in coming

years. At such times, we occasionally face a moment of choice, in which we can

decide what to believe. But, recognizing that evidence alone is insufficient to

guide belief, how are we to choose?

I suggest that we choose a

belief, and the corresponding psychological state accompanying it, based on how

well it aligns with who we truly are and who we want to become. This doesn't

mean to ignore evidence, for quite often anomalous events can show us that our

personal mythology is cracking apart, and that we are ready to moult. It does

mean to consider how each belief-state feels, what it implies about the world,

about human beings, and about oneself. How does it affect the answer to the

question, "Who am I?" What needs does it meet? How does it hurt? What

emotions does it evoke? You can take a few moments to sit with an article from

a conspiracy website like Project Camelot or 9/11 Truth, and then with a

debunking article from CSICOP, and notice the ways in which each feels

gratifying, offensive, reassuring, or threatening. Then I invite you to do the

same with the third alternative that I offer in the essay.

This third alternative

preserves the mythic truths of the New World Order hypothesis, truths that lie

outside its interpretive framework. Here are two of them:

(1) A nefarious power, inimical

to human well-being, manipulates the course of human events from behind the

scenes, seeking the total control of every human being.

Rather than an evil Illuminati,

could that power be money? Some say that a global elite controls humanity via

the money system, but could it be that it is rather the money system that

controls the global elite? I'm sure many of you have known the feeling of being

enslaved to money. The wealthy are not exempt, and indeed, possessing more of

it, are even more deeply enslaved to its logic. It is truly an "invisible

hand," a force that "makes the world go 'round." Moreover, the

end toward which money compels us is one of misery and ugliness: the

destruction of nature and culture, community and health, and all that is

beautiful on earth.

Even those we might consider

most culpable for the injustices and despoliation of our world act with little

awareness of what they are creating. Whether they are hedge fund managers

seeking to maximize a number (profit), or political leaders seeking to further

"American interests," the reality behind these symbols is obscure to

them. They are victims of their own propaganda, doing harm while sincerely

believing to be doing good. It is easy to believe this of people in the middle

and bottom of the pyramid, the ignorant and the duped. It is harder to

understand how it could apply to people at the top, yet it is equally true – if

not more true – of them. They are among the most hopeless dupes of all.

Money is not the only candidate

for the nefarious controlling power. Various ideologies and their corresponding

being-states, in particular those I call Separation and Ascent, are

even more deeply responsible. They create a culture, and a self, that seeks to

maximize security, predictability, and control; to measure and quantify the

world; to eliminate risk and establish liability; to extend property rights and

legal codes into every corner of life, and to monitor everyone and keep track

of every thing. The destination of such a program is none other than what the

conspiracists fear: a totalitarian "one world government."

We might say, then, that it is

not those at the top of the pyramid that control the rest; it is the pyramid

itself that controls all. But this pyramid, this Tower, built of the defining

myths of our civilization, is evidently crumbling before our eyes.

I am not necessarily saying,

"It isn't the Draconian races, it is the money system (or the myth of

Separation)." Rather, these refer to one and the same thing, viewed

through a different lens. In one reality, it is money, in another it is the

ETs.

(2)We are subject to

technologies of mind control that hold us in thrall.

New World Order conspiracists

posit the existence of futuristic mind control based on alien technologies,

beamed from the communication infrastructure, riding upon cell phone towers,

television transmissions, and so on, or transmitted via occult symbology.

subliminal messages, and neuro-linguistic programming techniques. There is

truth in this, but the truth is deeper than the conspiracists realize.

Television stupifies us not only through its content, but through the ability

of the medium itself to usurp the image-making capacity of the brain and create

intellectual dependency. Advertising and, more subtly, the narratives of the

mass media condition our thoughts and desires, so that we become afraid of

freedom and nearly incapable of rebelling. But these technologies are rather

clumsy and overt compared with the way that institutions of our culture, by

their very logic, limit the range and manner of our thinking. Education,

science, religion, medicine, parenting, and the legal system all condition us

to think in certain ways. But the most pervasive and powerful mind control

technology, so ubiquitous as to be unnoticable, is undoubtedly the language

itself.

Can we overcome dualism, when

our language is rife with it? Can we transcend separation, when our language

assumes it in its very structure? By their very existence certain words limit

us to thoughts that subtly serve the status quo. For example, when I when I say

that reality isn't what we think it is, by using the word "is" I

reinforce the very independently-existing reality that I am trying to deny.

More generally, as a system of signs, language distances us from the reality it

is supposed to represent, allowing us to more easily treat the world as other.

Sometimes, during meditation or mystical experience, the veil of language lifts

and the richness of the unmediated world is revealed, and along with it the

depth of our thralldom.

Again, even as it reaches its

extreme, the system of mind control is crumbling. The devaluation of language

that I discuss in The

Ubiquitous Matrix of Lies has engendered a pervasive cynicism, a

discounting of all speech, that renders the tools of mind control increasingly

ineffective. So inured are we to a world of image and hype, that we believe

little of what we are told. Switching to the NWO lens, we might say that the

Illuminati are panicking, desperately ramping up their mind control efforts to

less and less effect.

A New Story

There are many other mythic

truths, and variants of these, that could be added to the list. To me, they

carry a resonance that transcends interpretation. Here are a few to play with:

"The institutions of power are carrying us toward a secret and horrible

destination." "Many among us have been programmed through trauma to

serve this end." "The servants of the conspiracy look and act as

normal people — you can never tell who they are." (And maybe you could be

one of them and not even know it.) "All that we think is real is an

illusion." "Invisible shadow institutions lie hidden within the

visible ones and serve purposes different from, or even opposed to, their

stated purpose." The New World Order story dresses these mythic truths in

its own language, and in so doing provides a valuable service, giving people

access to them.

At some point, however, the

story that was once enlightening becomes confining. As I have explained,

conspiracy theories eventually bring most people to a kind of despair, even

paralysis. When that happens, when the NWO story has run the course of its usefulness,

it helps to have a new, larger story to step into.

The new story says that the

abiding intuition that you have carried perhaps your whole life, and which drew

you to conspiracism in the first place, is true. The world is governed

by a secret power that holds us in bondage to no good end. But the conspirators

are not others, they are we, you and I and everyone. A secret agenda of

domination and control has existed in nearly everyone, and a world embodying

that agenda has congealed around us, attracted to the dark, reptilian energies

we have harbored. The good news is that these energies have nearly run their

course, as the world of control breaks down and the campaign to conquer and

dominate all other being founders on its own consequences. Just as Voldemort

was unable to possess Harry Potter because he couldn't abide the love within

him, so also is the ruling power of the world unable to abide our growing

realization of our connectedness. Love, the felt experience of oneness, is

spreading as the walls of separation come down. They never were sustainable.

Today, even the most deluded – the power elite – are beginning to recognize

that. The reign of the Illuminati is nearly over. That is seems to be reaching

unprecedented heights only bespeaks the imminence of its demise, the extreme of

yang giving birth to yin.

The war of good versus evil was

never anything but a lie. The concept of evil is perhaps the greatest servant

of evil. "Is there such a thing as evil?" I was once asked.

"Before you asked, the answer was no. After you asked, the answer is

yes." But ultimately, evil and its expression as the New World Order, or

as I would call it, the process of Separation, has like all other things its

purpose in this universe. We embark on a journey of separation in all its

forms, we reach its extreme, and we come back to Union at a higher level of

complexity, enriched by our journey. To adopt one last time the vocabulary of

the New World Order myth, we might say that the reptilian overlords or the

Illuminati have fulfilled their purpose. Though some might try to hold onto it

a little longer, sooner or later they will accept that their time is over, and

they will bow out of service.

The greater truth, though,

which contains but does not contradict the lesser, is that the Illuminati, the

Reptilians, are you and I. On this level too, what I have said is true. Can you

not feel the obsolescence of that part of you, the part that endlessly seeks to

control the world, to dominate others, to maximize egoic self-interest? Is it

not increasingly evident that its efforts have created only misery? Is it not

apparent that, no matter how hard you try to remedy its failure by intensifying

its efforts, its ultimate failure is assured? For all of us, the time is coming

for that part of ourselves to bow out, so that we can step into service, into

trust, and, collectively, into the more beautiful world our hearts know is

possible.

* Note to Santa and the Caped

Crusader: please don't take offense. I'm only invoking your names for rhetorical

effect, not because I actually doubt your existence.

Image by vasenka, courtesy of Creative Commons license.