↓

https://twitter.com/mombot/status/575899315912077313



I am really Sorry about that.

I’m afraid to say but I have to say the fact. I’m sorry about my profile writting.

I was surprised at meaning of the text in the picture when I was told it by Dhan_Shark. Because I am not a proffesor of any university. But I never wanted to pretend it on purpose. There are some reasons to have happened this mistaken. Please give me opportunity to explain my mistake. I never want to have you read the essay under the misrepresenting. So, I have explained that to everyone before I release the body of the essay. I would like to try to explain that. And I would like you to listen it if you don’t mind. However, I’m afraid to say but I am very bad at English.So, Dhan Shark, who helps me to read and write in English in roninworks, explain that.(This text also is translated by him.)

I’m going to RT his tweet of explanations.

==============================================================

Dharnshark’s tweet (@Dahan_Shark)

Hello Gamergate. I will appriciate your kindness if you give me opportunity to explain that. And if you accept our apology after that, we roninworks greatly appriciate for your tolerance. Okakura is so bad at English that he writes “I’m mistake” for meaning “I made a mistake”.

So, I @Dahan_Shark verify and support Okakura’s English tweets but I can’t do that every time and every where. In this case, I got firstly aware of it and then told Okakura. I would like to ask you for understanding this case is not preparing but just mistaken and failure of comunication. Okakura told @mombot “I will send this essay to universities in America” in Japanese on twitter DM. And mombot probably had seen a phrase “2channeler, Prof and Storywriter of Japanculture in Roninworks” in the twitter profile of Okakura.

So, he thought Okakura was a professor. It is natural. Mombot met Okakura only 2 days ago. But Okakura and I never had thought he would mention about our idea directly on twitter at all. And I were not able to verify the text in the picture. Actually, I am not good at English very much too, and at that time other English comunications took all time from me and Okakura.

I asked Okakura why he wrote “Prof”, and he answered me that he had expected that the expression was accepted as a nickname or meaning of a person seems like a professor. He says he imagined Ryuichi Sakamoto to be called “Professor” in Japan, in spite of he is not a real professor, or Professor X in X-Men. But, of cause, mombot didn’t know that, so this mistaken happened. I believe that you are disappointed with this if you would like to read text that is written by a person who has real career of a professor. I and Okakura are really sorry about that. So, of cause, you don’t have to read the Okakura essay. But I would like to recommend once reading it even though that.

Actually, I graduated from institution of the master’s degree of Humanities and social sciences at a national university in Japan. (This is not a rhetorical expression. Just literally.) From the viewpoint, Okakura has deep thought of wide‐ranging studies and reading a large amount of books as much as enough to be called “Professor”. Especially, Okakura has studied literature of Haniya Yutaka(埴谷雄高) who was a political and social thinker and a novelist in Japan.

Haniya had predicted human being has a potential that seems like a potential as comunication among many anonymous on the internet will make, from todays aspects. Haniya’s writings “Shirei(死霊)” had expressed that idea. He started writing that book at 1946. Haniya noticed the potential on the supposition that the style of comunication can be done, long before the internet has appeared in the world. I believe that you will understand it is true what I have said when you read the Okakura essay. I must be grateful to you if you keep motivation to read the essay. I ask you to remember and believe your feeling when you read the introduction.





I also would like to explain the reason why roninworks will send the essay to the trade of academism. I never said that from caprice. I gave this plan to Okakura in discussion with him. Gamergate activity is fights to defend gaming. It seems like a battle defencing a fortress of fairness. This kind of fights is positively necessary for the first step to win this long war finally.

But it is also necessary for us to evolve situation to the next step. We need to take the offensive against the enemy in the second step. However, how can we legally attack Anita Sarkeesian and her clique ? She still looks like having enough strength in reserve.

To begin with, why can she looks like something putting on airs unashamedly ?

Because, She has never fought in her own home area. She alawys fight in other people home area anytime. So, her stronghold have been still left untouched. What is her fortress ? It’s feminism and cultural studies in academism. Please think about this. If Sarkeesian was just as a gamer, does yellow journalism take up her opinion ?

Yellow journalism do so because of Sarkeesian is a feminist and cuturalstudies scholar. If she only shown the pile of video game softwares on youtube, yellow journalism would never pick up her. It means that yellow journalism looks on her as somethng being usefulfor a certain purpose when she is an academician.

Well, here is a phrase in a tactics method book “Sonshi(孫子)”. The phrase is “背丘勿逆” in Chinese. This means “Don’t attack face to face a enemy who has some support behind them”. So, we have to pull the gaming-feminist apart from the usual ones in universities. Then, how can do we that?

I have read a section of the master’s thesis by Sarkeesian. That is terrible because that has big problem as lack of reasons and rational explanations, similar to her videos. I and Okakura can reasonably point out wrong things in her text. Of cause, she must ignore that. But other feminists in universities can neglect that ?

For example, she is one. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angela_McRobbie

If she lets that be, she will be in danger of losing her public credibility. If she criticize Sarkeesian, Sarkeesian lose feminism’s support. We can do the same action for cultural studies scholars in universities. I have said “She always fight in other people home area anytime.” This is the radical problem in cultural studies and their Achilles’ heel. Because all cultural studies has the aim to make any sub culture be free from main culture’s ruling regarding that as the act of aggression. They can’t permit letting the fact be left.

If cultural studies scholars in universities become aware that gaming is one of the unique cultures, we can separate Sarkeesian from other cultural studies scholars. Because that awareness means the present cultural studies for gaming is also act of aggression.

I think it will be easy for roninworks to prove that logically, since Sarkeesian also claim by herself that gaming culture is a unique culture. And the Okakura essay tells about value of gaming, too. You may suspect that scholars neglect our voice even though we claim rationally. I think about that, and then I have one of the solutions we need.

Look at this article. http://www.buzzfeed.com/lizzyf620/repost-gamergate-through-my-eyes-190rr

I and Okakura would like to make some opinion paper and report analyzing the truth of Gamergate without the gaming feministic biased view. This news media is a rival company competing the medias plopeling the present yellow journalism today. Of cause, this is an example of those rival company.

If there are other sites or other companies can agree with us or are competing the todays main gaming journalism medias, we can cooperate them.

They want to rise above their station and the todays biggest gaming news medias are in the way. If the rival company uncovers todays main gaming journalism media’s scandal, that helps the rival company to success in the journalism media trade. They will appearl the general public out of gaming culture for looking for new subscribers besides gamers since there is a situation that nowadays gaming journalism medias have already monopolized subscribers in gamers. If scholars and feminists in universities still have neglected the gaming-feminism fault when it is, they will get exposed blaming from the general public, not only from gamers. It works as pressure on academicians and scholars in universities.

Eventually, these our action also will help the honest academicians and scholars like @CHSommers to appeal to the general public. Okakura tells necessity of speaking to people who are not gamers, in his essay introduction. Appealing to universities and medias except gaming journalism medias of nowadays, that form a part of the speaking to. Generally speaking, Okakura and I have made the essay in order to get evolving the present situation to these next steps. However, we Gamergate don’t have to refute each opponent perfectly. Gamergate have only one necessity for the general public not to conclude that Gamergate is evil. And, the general public usually stop judging when they feel that they can’t do judging whether opinion is true crealy by themself. Then, Gamergate can avoid the bad conclusion. For that situation coming true, each academician and scholor and journalist claims various opinions from their own perspective. So, it is enough to end in a draw against SJW and yellow journalism. It keeps our gaming culture fortress to be protected. But on the other hand, at the same time, that means Anita Sarkeesian and her clique aggression have ended in failure.

I could not explain details of the every method for now because of I’m not good at English. But I promise we roninworks can do things I have told you if we have good translators help.