<a class="H-lightbox-open" href="http://www.overclock.net/content/type/61/id/2326110/"><img alt="" class="lightbox-enabled" data-id="2326110" data-type="61" src="http://www.overclock.net/content/type/61/id/2326110/width/1500/height/2500/flags/LL" style="; width: 1190px; height: 1170px"></a><br><br>

For Comparison (The current Firestrike Extreme Record):<br><br><a class="H-lightbox-open" href="http://www.overclock.net/content/type/61/id/2326129/"><img alt="" class="lightbox-enabled" data-id="2326129" data-type="61" src="http://www.overclock.net/content/type/61/id/2326129/width/1500/height/2500/flags/LL" style="; width: 1500px; height: 904px"></a><br><br><div class="quote-container"><span>Quote:</span>

<div class="quote-block">In Baidu Post Bar gives a figure known as running sub R9 390X Quad Crossfire, with the Core i7-5960X, 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme project reached 38,875 points.<br><br>

This is what concept? In the current 3DMark official rankings, the best result is four parallel 29,207 from Core i7-5960X, GTX 980, and are significantly overclocked, this four R9 390X cards can lead a full 33%!<br><br>

Judging from the screenshot, 3DMark for identifying new card already in place, the core frequency over to 1455MHz, memory frequency of 5GHz, but not the frequency of the processor, but also to see the rumors of HBM high-bandwidth memory.<br><br>

Puliao who said that this achievement and the last leaked ran 3DMark 11 points, are from Fujian friends Xel'Naga hair test, but used the same graphics card and driver samples from a Japanese friend in Taiwan to work in Shanghai .</div>

</div>

<div class="quote-container"><span>Quote:</span>

<div class="quote-block">To further prove that, "cooldogman" also released a photo card back, saying that the MSI R9 390X sample card:</div>

</div>

<a class="H-lightbox-open" href="http://www.overclock.net/content/type/61/id/2326113/"><img alt="" class="lightbox-enabled" data-id="2326113" data-type="61" src="http://www.overclock.net/content/type/61/id/2326113/width/1500/height/2000/flags/LL" style="; width: 305px; height: 769px"></a><br><br><b>Source 1:</b> <a href="http://www.chiphell.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1224052&extra=page%3D1%26filter%3Dauthor%26orderby%3Ddateline" target="_blank">http://www.chiphell.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1224052&extra=page%3D1%26filter%3Dauthor%26orderby%3Ddateline</a><br><br><b>Translated Source:</b> <a href="https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chiphell.com%2Fforum.php%3Fmod%3Dviewthread%26tid%3D1224052&sandbox=1" target="_blank">https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chiphell.com%2Fforum.php%3Fmod%3Dviewthread%26tid%3D1224052&sandbox=1</a><br><br>

So the question is can this one be debunked too?