Fud Busters 2 — Big Lebovsky strikes back

On second of February, a Medium article was published. It was about an ongoing ICO at that time. Guess what was it about ; the future of Cryptofinance: Fusion.

On his article, which still circulates and creates FUD around Fusion, he implies 3 major points

Previously I have answered his 3. claim about KYC process . If you want to read that ;

https://medium.com/@barszen/lebovsky-throws-a-needle-in-the-barn-thousands-are-still-trying-to-find-it-kyc-17e315180ae

Today I will investigate his second claim.

He says “2. We need to know who are the “Institutional Supporters” of Fusion.”

Our beloved Lebovsky, starts to investigate Fusion’s institutional investors. And didn’t like the website of the 1. investor; Eastmore group. He finds out the IP address was recently acquired , and finds the website like “ business card”.

IF, our friend Lebovsky, had checked SEC files ,rather than godaddy’s IP addresses, he could have find that Eastmore group was a SEC registered fund.

I have mailed Eastmore Group and informed Lebovsky’s discontent about their website. The assistant told me that she will let the CEO know about it.

About the second investor , our friend Lebovsky, says the website is not even working but strange I just work perfectly fine to me

· http://www.alpviewcapital.com/

Go ahead and try for yourself!

Also he mentions that the company logo was not the same on Fusion’s website.

I am posting both logos, you decide for yourself.

The third investor is Lockwood. Here Our friend Lebovsky states

“Another one-pager with a simplest website template. It’s obviously a fake page”.

http://lockwood.lu/

If he could just not based everything on his search “whois.com”.

He could have searched Linked-in and find out , for example

That , there is actually a Company called Lockwood, has a manager called Mark Klein. And even better, if he had looked his recent activities, he would have seen that they are interested in blockchain technology.

I guess he couldn’t find out anything, meaningful for FBG Capital when he did his research by “Whois.com”. Here meaningful for him is really not meaningful for anybody else, by the way)

https://fbg.capital/

Strangely, he does not make any other research about these companies other than the IP address registration data ,like legitimacy, legal documents, workers etc. Only research and fake accusations just depends on our beloved Lebovsky’s famous “Whois.com” investigation. And he decides, just by looking at the IP addresses that these companies do not exist and they are fake.