Might have been best for them, but I sure don’t agree with some of their reasoning.

We’ve been through the use of voice for typing. Fine (eventually) for some situations, but absolutely awful for others. It isn’t going to replace keyboards for most.

The supposed lack of “need” is overblown. No one has ever argued that it is needed. That applies to pretty much every keyboard.

His “novelty” wearing off argument doesn’t seem to match the feelings of any testers. As for maybe wearing out, who knows, but it sounds almost like he’s looking for excuses to justify his decision.

I believe he also made a comment about it starting to look “long in the tooth”? Huh?