The Order Paper and Notice Paper is a document that guides the deliberations of the Senate and lists items of business currently before it. These items are listed in several different categories and in a priority according to an arrangement adopted by the Senate as stipulated in the rules. The majority of these items constitute the Orders of the Day which are called following Routine Proceedings. These items are themselves divided into two principal categories - government business and other business. Within each of these two categories are items for bills, motions, inquiries and reports of committees.

The Notice Paper contains the text of motions and inquiries not yet called for debate.

The Order Paper and Notice Paper is prepared every day in advance of the actual sitting.

Order of Business

(The following is an outline of a typical sitting day in the Senate. Variations are possible subject to the Rules and to the decisions of the Senate.)

Senators' Statements (15 minutes)

ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS (30 minutes)

1. Tabling of Documents

2. Presenting or Tabling Reports from Committees

3. Government Notices of Motions

4. Government Notices of Inquiries

5. Introduction and First Reading of Government Bills

6. Introduction and First Reading of Senate Public Bills

7. First Reading of Commons Public Bills

8. Reading of Petitions for Private Bills

9. Introduction and First Reading of Private Bills

10. Tabling of Reports from Interparliamentary Delegations

11. Notices of Motions

12. Notices of Inquiries

13. Tabling of Petitions

Question Period (30 minutes)

Delayed Answers

ORDERS OF THE DAY

Government Business

• Bills — Messages from the House of Commons

• Bills — Third Reading

• Bills — Reports of Committees

• Bills — Second Reading

• Reports of Committees — Other

• Motions

• Inquiries

• Other

Other Business

• Bills — Messages from the House of Commons

• Senate Public Bills — Third Reading

• Commons Public Bills — Third Reading

• Private Bills — Third Reading

• Senate Public Bills — Reports of Committees

• Commons Public Bills — Reports of Committees

• Private Bills — Reports of Committees

• Senate Public Bills — Second Reading

• Commons Public Bills — Second Reading

• Private Bills — Second Reading

• Reports of Committees — Other

• Motions

• Inquiries

• Other

NOTICE PAPER

• Notices of Motions

• Notices of Inquiries

Orders Of The Day

Government Business

Bills – Messages from the House of Commons

Nil

Bills – Third Reading

Nil

Bills – Reports of Committees

No. 1.

November 28, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator MacDonald, seconded by the Honourable Senator Carignan, P.C., for the adoption of the fifth report of the Standing Senate Committee on Transport and Communications (Bill S-2, An Act to amend the Motor Vehicle Safety Act and to make a consequential amendment to another Act, with an amendment), presented in the Senate on November 24, 2016.

Bills – Second Reading

No. 1.

December 13, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Petitclerc, seconded by the Honourable Senator Lankin, P.C., for the second reading of Bill S-5, An Act to amend the Tobacco Act and the Non-smokers’ Health Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts.

No. 2.

November 28, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Mitchell, seconded by the Honourable Senator Fraser, for the second reading of Bill C-16, An Act to amend the Canadian Human Rights Act and the Criminal Code.

Reports of Committees – Other

Nil

Motions

No. 1.

December 8, 2015—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Jaffer, seconded by the Honourable Senator Cordy:

That the following Address be presented to His Excellency the Governor General of Canada:

To His Excellency the Right Honourable David Johnston, Chancellor and Principal Companion of the Order of Canada, Chancellor and Commander of the Order of Military Merit, Chancellor and Commander of the Order of Merit of the Police Forces, Governor General and Commander-in-Chief of Canada.

MAY IT PLEASE YOUR EXCELLENCY:

We, Her Majesty’s most loyal and dutiful subjects, the Senate of Canada in Parliament assembled, beg leave to offer our humble thanks to Your Excellency for the gracious Speech which Your Excellency has addressed to both Houses of Parliament.

Inquiries

No. 1.

By the Honourable Senator Harder, P.C.:

April 13, 2016—That he will call the attention of the Senate to the budget entitled Growing the Middle Class, tabled in the House of Commons on March 22, 2016, by the Minister of Finance, the Honourable Bill Morneau, P.C., M.P., and in the Senate on March 24, 2016.

Other

Nil

Other Business

Rule 4-15(2) states:

Except as otherwise ordered by the Senate, any item of Other Business on the Order Paper and any motion or inquiry on the Notice Paper that have not been proceeded with during 15 sitting days shall be dropped from the Order Paper and Notice Paper.

Consequently, the number appearing in parentheses indicates the number of sittings since the item was last proceeded with.

Bills – Messages from the House of Commons

Nil

Senate Public Bills – Third Reading

Nil

Commons Public Bills – Third Reading

No. 1.

December 15, 2016—Third reading of Bill C-210, An Act to amend the National Anthem Act (gender).—(Honourable Senator Lankin, P.C.)

Private Bills – Third Reading

Nil

Senate Public Bills – Reports of Committees

Nil

Commons Public Bills – Reports of Committees

Nil

Private Bills – Reports of Committees

Nil

Senate Public Bills – Second Reading

No. 1.

December 15, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Moore, seconded by the Honourable Senator Joyal, P.C., for the second reading of Bill S-234, An Act to amend the Parliament of Canada Act (Parliamentary Artist Laureate).—(Honourable Senator Bovey)

No. 2. (three)

December 8, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Frum, seconded by the Honourable Senator Pratte, for the second reading of Bill S-232, An Act respecting Canadian Jewish Heritage Month.—(Honourable Senator Wetston)

No. 3. (three)

February 2, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Hervieux-Payette, P.C., seconded by the Honourable Senator Joyal, P.C., for the second reading of Bill S-206, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (protection of children against standard child-rearing violence).—(Honourable Senator Sinclair)

No. 4. (four)

March 24, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Patterson, seconded by the Honourable Senator Enverga, for the second reading of Bill S-221, An Act to amend the Constitution Act, 1867 (Property qualifications of Senators).—(Honourable Senator Hubley)

No. 5. (seven)

May 31, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Jaffer, seconded by the Honourable Senator Hubley, for the second reading of Bill S-222, An Act for the promotion and advancement of Canada’s linguistic plurality.—(Honourable Senator Jaffer)

No. 6. (fourteen)

February 18, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Jaffer, seconded by the Honourable Senator Baker, P.C., for the second reading of Bill S-210, An Act to amend An Act to amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, the Civil Marriage Act and the Criminal Code and to make consequential amendments to other Acts.—(Honourable Senator Mockler)

No. 7. (three)

December 8, 2016—Second reading of Bill S-233, An Act to amend the Customs Act and the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (presentation and reporting requirements).—(Honourable Senator Runciman)

No. 8.

December 15, 2016—Second reading of Bill S-235, An Act to amend the Prohibiting Cluster Munitions Act (investments).—(Honourable Senator Ataullahjan)

Commons Public Bills – Second Reading

Nil

Private Bills – Second Reading

Nil

Reports of Committees – Other

No. 1.

November 2, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Tannas, seconded by the Honourable Senator Wells, for the adoption of the sixth report (interim) of the Special Senate Committee on Senate Modernization, entitled Senate Modernization: Moving Forward (Speakership), presented in the Senate on October 5, 2016.—(Honourable Senator Day)

No. 2.

October 6, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Eggleton, P.C., seconded by the Honourable Senator Day, for the adoption of the third report (interim) of the Special Senate Committee on Senate Modernization, entitled Senate Modernization: Moving Forward (Committees), presented in the Senate on October 4, 2016.—(Honourable Senator Plett)

No. 3. (one)

November 24, 2016—Resuming debate on the consideration of the eighth report of the Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs, entitled Delaying Justice is Denying Justice: An Urgent Need to Address Lengthy Court Delays in Canada, deposited with the Clerk of the Senate on August 12, 2016.—(Honourable Senator Runciman)

No. 4. (two)

December 12, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Joyal, P.C., seconded by the Honourable Senator Cordy, for the adoption of the tenth report (interim) of the Special Senate Committee on Senate Modernization, entitled Senate Modernization: Moving Forward (Nature), presented in the Senate on October 26, 2016.—(Honourable Senator Joyal, P.C.)

No. 5. (three)

December 8, 2016—Resuming debate on the consideration of the ninth report (interim) of the Special Senate Committee on Senate Modernization, entitled Senate Modernization: Moving Forward (Question Period), presented in the Senate on October 25, 2016.—(Honourable Senator Frum)

No. 6. (four)

December 7, 2016—Consideration of the sixth report (interim) of the Standing Senate Committee on Transport and Communications, entitled Pipelines for Oil: Protecting our Economy, Respecting our Environment, tabled in the Senate on December 7, 2016.—(Honourable Senator MacDonald)

No. 7. (five)

December 6, 2016—Consideration of the fifth report of the Standing Senate Committee on Human Rights, entitled Finding Refuge in Canada: A Syrian Resettlement Story, deposited with the Clerk of the Senate on December 6, 2016.—(Honourable Senator Munson)

No. 8. (ten)

November 28, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Wells, seconded by the Honourable Senator Enverga, for the adoption of the second report (interim) of the Special Senate Committee on Senate Modernization, entitled Senate Modernization: Moving Forward (Omnibus Bills), presented in the Senate on October 4, 2016.—(Honourable Senator Bellemare)

No. 9. (twelve)

October 27, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator McCoy, seconded by the Honourable Senator Ringuette, for the adoption of the fifth report (interim) of the Special Senate Committee on Senate Modernization, entitled Senate Modernization: Moving Forward (Caucus), presented in the Senate on October 4, 2016.—(Honourable Senator Sibbeston)

No. 10. (fifteen)

November 3, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Greene, seconded by the Honourable Senator Andreychuk, for the adoption of the fourth report (interim) of the Special Senate Committee on Senate Modernization, entitled Senate Modernization: Moving Forward (Order Paper), presented in the Senate on October 4, 2016.—(Honourable Senator Cools)

No. 11. (thirteen)

November 22, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Massicotte, seconded by the Honourable Senator Moore, for the adoption of the seventh report (interim) of the Special Senate Committee on Senate Modernization, entitled Senate Modernization: Moving Forward (Regional interest), presented in the Senate on October 18, 2016.—(Honourable Senator Plett)

No. 12. (fourteen)

November 15, 2016—Resuming debate on the consideration of the first report (interim) of the Special Senate Committee on Senate Modernization, entitled Senate Modernization: Moving Forward, deposited with the Clerk of the Senate on October 4, 2016.—(Honourable Senator McInnis)

No. 13. (one)

December 14, 2016—Consideration of the third report (interim) of the Standing Committee on Rules, Procedures and the Rights of Parliament, entitled Changes to the Order Paper and Notice Paper, presented in the Senate on December 14, 2016.—(Honourable Senator Fraser)

Motions

No. 73.

March 24, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Patterson, seconded by the Honourable Senator Runciman:

Whereas the Senate provides representation for groups that are often underrepresented in Parliament, such as Aboriginal peoples, visible minorities and women;

Whereas paragraph (3) of section 23 of the Constitution Act, 1867 requires that, in order to be qualified for appointment to and to maintain a place in the Senate, a person must own land with a net worth of at least four thousand dollars in the province for which he or she is appointed;

Whereas a person’s personal circumstances or the availability of real property in a particular location may prevent him or her from owning the required property;

Whereas appointment to the Senate should not be restricted to those who own real property of a minimum net worth;

Whereas the existing real property qualification is inconsistent with the democratic values of modern Canadian society and is no longer an appropriate or relevant measure of the fitness of a person to serve in the Senate;

Whereas, in the case of Quebec, each of the twenty-four Senators representing the province must be appointed for and must have either their real property qualification in or be resident of a specified Electoral Division;

Whereas an amendment to the Constitution of Canada in relation to any provision that applies to one or more, but not all, provinces may be made by proclamation issued by the Governor General under the Great Seal of Canada only where so authorized by resolutions of the Senate and House of Commons and of the legislative assembly of each province to which the amendment applies;

Whereas the Supreme Court of Canada has determined that a full repeal of paragraph (3) of section 23 of the Constitution Act, 1867, respecting the real property qualification of Senators, would require a resolution of the Quebec National Assembly pursuant to section 43 of the Constitution Act, 1982;

Now, therefore, the Senate resolves that an amendment to the Constitution of Canada be authorized to be made by proclamation issued by His Excellency the Governor General under the Great Seal of Canada in accordance with the Schedule hereto.

SCHEDULE

AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF CANADA

1.(1) Paragraph (3) of section 23 of the Constitution Act, 1867 is repealed.

(2) Section 23 of the Act is amended by replacing the semi-colon at the end of paragraph (5) with a period and by repealing paragraph (6).

2.The Declaration of Qualification set out in The Fifth Schedule to the Act is replaced by the following:

I, A.B., do declare and testify that I am by law duly qualified to be appointed a member of the Senate of Canada.

3.This Amendment may be cited as the Constitution Amendment, [year of proclamation] (Real property qualification of Senators).—(Honourable Senator Maltais)

No. 72. (one)

October 27, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Joyal, P.C., seconded by the Honourable Senator Moore:

The Senate invite the Government of Canada to mark the 150th anniversary of Confederation by striking a commemorative medal which, with the traditional symbols of Canada, would recognize the inestimable contribution made by aboriginal peoples to the emergence of a better Canada; and

That this medal be distributed, among others, to those persons who contributed to improving the living conditions of all Canadians in a significant manner over the last 50 years.—(Honourable Senator Joyal, P.C.)

No. 69. (one)

March 10, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Boisvenu, seconded by the Honourable Senator Dawson:

That the Senate urge the government to take all necessary steps to bring into force as soon as possible by order-in-council the provisions of C-452 An Act to amend the Criminal Code (exploitation and trafficking in persons), chapter 16 of the Statutes of Canada (2015), which received royal assent on June 18, 2015.—(Honourable Senator Lang)

No. 146. (two)

December 12, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Ringuette, seconded by the Honourable Senator Lankin, P.C.:

That the Standing Senate Committee on Banking, Trade, and Commerce be authorized to:

(a)Review the operations of the Financial Consumer Agency of Canada (FCAC), the Ombudsman for Banking Services and Investments (OBSI), and ADR Chambers Banking Ombuds Office (ADRBO);

(b)Review the agencies’ interaction with and respect for provincial jurisdictions;

(c)Review and determine best practices from similar agencies in other jurisdictions;

(d)Provide recommendations to ensure that the FCAC, OBSI, and ADRBO can better protect consumers and respect provincial jurisdiction; and

That the Committee submit its final report no later than May 31, 2017, and retain all powers necessary to publicize its findings until 180 days after the tabling of the final report.—(Honourable Senator Tkachuk)

No. 89. (four)

May 12, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Bellemare, seconded by the Honourable Senator Harder, P.C.:

That, in order to ensure that legislative reports of Senate committees follow a transparent, comprehensible and non-partisan methodology, the Rules of the Senate be amended by replacing rule 12-23(1) by the following:

“Obligation to report bill

12-23. (1) The committee to which a bill has been referred shall report the bill to the Senate. The report shall set out any amendments that the committee is recommending. In addition, the report shall have appended to it the committee’s observations on:

(a) whether the bill generally conforms with the Constitution of Canada, including:

(i) the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and

(ii) the division of legislative powers between Parliament and the provincial and territorial legislatures;

(b) whether the bill conforms with treaties and international agreements that Canada has signed or ratified;

(c) whether the bill unduly impinges on any minority or economically disadvantaged groups;

(d) whether the bill has any impact on one or more provinces or territories;

(e) whether the appropriate consultations have been conducted;

(f) whether the bill contains any obvious drafting errors;

(g) all amendments moved but not adopted in the committee, including the text of these amendments; and

(h) any other matter that, in the committee’s opinion, should be brought to the attention of the Senate.”

And on the motion in amendment of the Honourable Senator Nancy Ruth, seconded by the Honourable Senator Tkachuk:

That the motion be not now adopted, but that it be amended by:

1.adding the following new subsection after proposed subsection (c):

“(d) whether the bill has received substantive gender-based analysis;”; and

2.by changing the designation for current proposed subsections (d) to (h) to (e) to (i).—(Honourable Senator Bellemare)

No. 92. (eleven)

May 17, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Ngo, seconded by the Honourable Senator Cowan:

That the Senate note with concern the escalating and hostile behaviour exhibited by the People’s Republic of China in the South China Sea and consequently urge the Government of Canada to encourage all parties involved, and in particular the People’s Republic of China, to:

(a) recognize and uphold the rights of freedom of navigation and overflight as enshrined in customary international law and in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea;

(b) cease all activities that would complicate or escalate the disputes, such as the construction of artificial islands, land reclamation, and further militarization of the region;

(c) abide by all previous multilateral efforts to resolve the disputes and commit to the successful implementation of a binding Code of Conduct in the South China Sea;

(d) commit to finding a peaceful and diplomatic solution to the disputes in line with the provisions of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea and respect the settlements reached through international arbitration; and

(e) strengthen efforts to significantly reduce the environmental impacts of the disputes upon the fragile ecosystem of the South China Sea;

That the Senate also urge the Government of Canada to support its regional partners and allies and to take additional steps necessary to de-escalate tensions and restore the peace and stability of the region; and

That a message be sent to the House of Commons to acquaint it with the foregoing.—(Honourable Senator Meredith)

No. 60. (eleven)

February 25, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Wallace, seconded by the Honourable Senator Demers:

That, in order to provide for a representative of independent, non-partisan senators to be elected to the Standing Committee on Ethics and Conflict of Interest for Senators;

1. The Rules of the Senate be amended by replacing rule 12-27(1) by the following:

“Appointment of Committee

12-27. (1) As soon as practicable at the beginning of each session, the Leader of the recognized party with the largest number of Senators shall move a motion, seconded by the Leader of the recognized party with the second largest number of Senators, on the membership of the Standing Committee on Ethics and Conflict of Interest for Senators. This motion shall be deemed adopted without debate or vote, and a similar motion shall be moved for any substitutions in the membership of the Committee.”; and

2. The Ethics and Conflict of Interest Code for Senators be amended by replacing subsections 35(4) to (6) by the following:

“Election of members

(4) Two of the Committee members shall be elected by secret ballot in the caucus of the recognized party with the largest number of Senators at the opening of the session; two of the Committee members shall be elected by secret ballot in the caucus of the recognized party with the second largest number of Senators at the opening of the session; the fifth member shall be elected by secret ballot by the majority of the Senators who are authorized to attend sittings of the Senate and who do not belong to the caucus of the recognized party with either the largest or second largest number of Senators at an in camera meeting called by the Clerk of the Senate at the opening of the session.

Presentation and adoption of motion

(5) The Leader of the recognized party with the largest number of Senators, seconded by the Leader of the recognized party with the second largest number of Senators, shall present a motion on the full membership of the Committee to the Senate, which motion shall be deemed adopted without any debate or vote.

Chair

(6) The Chair of the Committee shall be elected by its five members.”.—(Honourable Senator Martin)

No. 43. (twelve)

February 4, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Fraser, seconded by the Honourable Senator Joyal, P.C.:

That, notwithstanding rule 12-27(1) and subsections 35(1), (4), (5) and (8) of the Ethics and Conflict of Interest Code for Senators, the Honourable Senators Andreychuk, Cordy, Frum, Joyal, P.C. and Tannas, be appointed to serve on the Standing Committee on Ethics and Conflict of Interest for Senators, until such time as a motion pursuant to rule 12-27(1) is adopted by the Senate; and

That, when a vacancy occurs in the membership of the committee before the establishment of the committee pursuant to rule 12-27(1), the replacement member shall be appointed by order of the Senate.

And on the motion in amendment of the Honourable Senator McCoy, seconded by the Honourable Senator Wallace:

That the motion be not now adopted, but that it be amended by replacing all words following the words “Ethics and Conflict of Interest Code for Senators,” by the following:

“the Standing Committee on Ethics and Conflict of Interest for Senators be composed of two Conservative senators, two Liberal senators, and one independent senator;

That the Conservative senators select the Conservative members to sit on the committee by means of a secret ballot;

That the Liberal senators select the Liberal members to sit on the committee by means of a secret ballot;

That the independent senators who are authorized to attend the Senate select the independent member to sit on the committee by means of a secret ballot;

That each of the groups of Conservative, Liberal and independent senators select a representative to move a motion in the Senate without notice that the selected senator or senators be a member or members of the committee, which motion shall be deemed seconded and adopted when moved;

That, when a vacancy occurs in the membership of the committee before the establishment of the committee pursuant to rule 12-27(1), the replacement member be appointed by the same process used to name the previous member of the committee; and

That the membership of Standing Committee on Ethics and Conflict of Interest for Senators as established pursuant to this motion remain in effect until such time as a motion pursuant to rule 12-27(1) is adopted by the Senate.”.

And on the subamendment of the Honourable Senator Pratte, seconded by the Honourable Senator Gagné:

That the motion in amendment be not now adopted, but that it be amended by:

1.replacing the words “two Liberal senators, and one independent senator” by the words “one Liberal senator and two independent senators”;

2.replacing the words “the Liberal members” by the words “the Liberal member”; and

3.replacing the words “the independent member” by the words “the independent members”.—(Honourable Senator Martin)

No. 31. (thirteen)

February 2, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Bellemare, seconded by the Honourable Senator Enverga:

That the Senate — in order to ensure transparency in the awarding of public funds and foster efficiency in infrastructure projects in the larger context of economic diversification and movement toward a greener economy, all while avoiding undue intervention in the federal-provincial division of powers — encourage the government to make provision in the budget for the creation of the Canadian Infrastructure Oversight and Best Practices Council, made up of experts in infrastructure projects from the provinces and territories, whose principal roles would be to:

1.collect information on federally funded infrastructure projects;

2. study the costs and benefits of federally funded infrastructure projects;

3. identify procurements best practices and of risk sharing;

4. promote these best practices among governments; and

5. promote project managers skills development; and

That a message be sent to the House of Commons to acquaint that House with the above.—(Honourable Senator Ataullahjan)

No. 51. (fourteen)

February 25, 2016—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Eggleton, P.C., seconded by the Honourable Senator Dawson:

That the Senate encourage the federal government, after appropriate consultations, to sponsor along with one or more of the provinces/territories a pilot project, and any complementary studies, to evaluate the cost and impact of implementing a national basic income program based on a negative income tax for the purpose of helping Canadians to escape poverty.

And on the motion in amendment of the Honourable Senator Bellemare, seconded by the Honourable Senator Harder, P.C.:

That the motion be amended to read as follows:

That the Senate encourage the federal government, after appropriate consultations, to provide support to initiatives by Provinces/Territories, including the Aboriginal Communities, aimed at evaluating the cost and impact of implementing measures, programs and pilot projects for the purpose of helping Canadians to escape poverty, by way of a basic income program (such as a negative income tax) and to report on their relative efficiency.—(Honourable Senator Eggleton, P.C.)

Inquiries

No. 1. (one)

December 10, 2015—Resuming debate on the inquiry of the Honourable Senator Chaput, calling the attention of the Senate to the Program to Support Linguistic Rights, the importance of ensuring public financing of court actions that seek to create a fair and just society and to the urgent need for the federal government to re-establish the Court Challenges Program.—(Honourable Senator Joyal, P.C.)

No. 16. (one)

December 13, 2016—Resuming debate on the inquiry of the Honourable Senator Meredith, calling the attention of the Senate to the increasing rates of violence in Canada’s urban centres and to the causes of this increase, and to some possible strategies to deal with this serious problem.—(Honourable Senator Meredith)

No. 17. (one)

December 13, 2016—Resuming debate on the inquiry of the Honourable Senator Meredith, calling the attention of the Senate to the Canadian Temporary Foreign Workers Program, including the living and working conditions of workers and their access to health care.—(Honourable Senator Meredith)

No. 13. (two)

October 25, 2016—Resuming debate on the inquiry of the Honourable Senator Bellemare, calling the attention of the Senate to the relevance of full employment in the 21st century in a Globalized economy.—(Honourable Senator Mitchell)

No. 15. (two)

October 25, 2016—Resuming debate on the inquiry of the Honourable Senator Maltais, calling the attention of the Senate to the softwood lumber crisis.—(Honourable Senator Martin)

No. 19. (three)

December 8, 2016—Resuming debate on the inquiry of the Honourable Senator Pate, calling the attention of the Senate to the circumstances of some of the most marginalized, victimized, criminalized and institutionalized in Canada, particularly the increasing over-representation of Indigenous women in Canadian prisons.—(Honourable Senator Omidvar)

No. 18. (five)

December 1, 2016—Resuming debate on the inquiry of the Honourable Senator Mockler, calling the attention of the Senate to the issue of pipeline safety in Canada, and the nation-building project that is the Energy East proposal, and its resulting impact on the Canadian economy.—(Honourable Senator Mercer)

No. 8. (eight)

May 5, 2016—Resuming debate on the inquiry of the Honourable Senator Bellemare, calling the attention of the Senate to the Senate’s legislative work from the 24th to the 41st Parliament and on elements of evaluation.—(Honourable Senator Andreychuk)

No. 12. (nine)

May 18, 2016—Resuming debate on the inquiry of the Honourable Senator Seidman, calling the attention of the Senate to its role in the protection of regional and minority representation.—(Honourable Senator Ataullahjan)

No. 14. (nine)

November 29, 2016—Resuming debate on the inquiry of the Honourable Senator Hubley, calling the attention of the Senate to the current state of literacy and literacy programs on Prince Edward Island, including the need for federal support of the PEI Literacy Alliance.—(Honourable Senator Griffin)

No. 11. (thirteen)

June 20, 2016—Resuming debate on the inquiry of the Honourable Senator Tardif, calling the attention of the Senate to the Trans Canada Trail — its history, benefits and the challenges it is faced with as it approaches its 25th anniversary.—(Honourable Senator Mitchell)

No. 2. (fifteen)

March 9, 2016—Resuming debate on the inquiry of the Honourable Senator Jaffer, calling the attention of the Senate to the human rights implications of climate change, and how it will affect the most vulnerable in Canada and the world by threatening their right to food, water, health, adequate shelter, life, and self-determination.—(Honourable Senator Sinclair)

Other

Nil

Notice Paper

Motions

No. 139. (eight)

By the Honourable Senator Joyal, P.C.:

December 1, 2016—That with Canada celebrating 150 years as a nation and acknowledging the lasting contribution of the First Nations, early settlers, and the continuing immigration of peoples from around the world who have made and continue to make Canada the great nation that it is, the Senate urge the Government to commit to establishing a National Portrait Gallery using the former US Embassy across from Parliament Hill as a lasting legacy to mark this important milestone in Canada’s history and in recognition of the people who contributed to its success.

No. 158. (one)

By the Honourable Senator Merchant:

December 14, 2016—That the Senate call upon the government of Canada:

(a) to recognize the genocide of the Pontic Greeks of 1916 to 1923 and to condemn any attempt to deny or distort a historical truth as being anything less than genocide, a crime against humanity; and

(b) to designate May 19th of every year hereafter throughout Canada as a day of remembrance of the over 353,000 Pontic Greeks who were killed or expelled from their homes.

Inquiries

No. 20. (three)

By the Honourable Senator Tardif:

December 8, 2016—That she will call the attention of the Senate to regional universities and the important role they play in Canada.

Written Questions

No. 18.

By the Honourable Senator Kenny:

October 18, 2016—With respect to bonuses (i.e. performance pay and at-risk pay) at the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) for “regular members”:

(a)how many RCMP employees were eligible to receive bonuses in each of the fiscal years for the period 2005-2016;

(b)how many RCMP employees received bonuses in each of the fiscal years for the period 2005-2016, and what was the

i)minimum bonus,

ii)maximum bonus, and

iii)average bonus, broken down by bonus type, and

(c)how many RCMP employees received bonuses awarded in whole, or in part, for achieving a savings or spending target in each of the fiscal years for the period 2005-2016, and what was the

i)minimum bonus,

ii)maximum bonus, and

iii)average bonus.

No. 19.

By the Honourable Senator Downe:

October 25, 2016—With respect to Veterans Affairs Canada:

In his response tabled on September 29th, 2016 to my Written Question, the Minister for Veterans Affairs indicated that 19 of the 61 senior management positions in Veterans Affairs Canada are not located at VAC National Headquarters in Charlottetown Prince Edward Island.

Regarding those 19 senior managers:

1.Who are these senior managers, identified by name, position title and salary range for each position?

2.Please provide a detailed list of the actual days that each of those 19 senior managers identified by the minister worked in Ottawa and how many days they worked at the National Headquarters in Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island since their respective appointments.

No. 20.

By the Honourable Senator Downe:

November 3, 2016—According to successive reports of the Public Service Commission of Canada, there has been a disturbing trend of federal government jobs becoming concentrated in the National Capital Region at the expense of the regions. For example, between 2008 and 2014, over 1,780 federal government jobs have been eliminated in Atlantic Canada and more than 360 of those jobs were in Prince Edward Island. During the same time period, the Ottawa area had their federal job employment increase by 1,835 positions.

In the past, moving government employment away from Ottawa has served to spread those jobs — and the benefits derived from them — throughout the country. Unfortunately, recent experience has been the opposite.

Therefore, with regard to federal government employment:

As of March 2016, what were the changes to the Public Service Employment Act population, by organization, for each of the provinces of Atlantic Canada as well as the National Capital Region?

No. 21.

By the Honourable Senator Cordy:

November 16, 2016—Hundreds of thousands of Canadians receive a Canada Pension Plan Disability Benefit due to a severe and prolonged diagnosis. For many who receive this benefit, it is their sole source of dependable financial support.

The Canada Pension Plan Disability Benefit Program does allow for those recipients who may be able to work part time, the option to earn up to $5400 a year before taxes (roughly 10 per cent of maximum pensionable earnings) before a penalty is incurred to their benefit.

As a result of this, some recipients do not actively seek out part time employment opportunities for fear of losing their CPP disability benefit. This is unfortunate, as many recipients, especially those with dependants, are living at or near the poverty line. Allowing recipients to supplement their disability benefit with additional income, when able, would help these Canadians provide better for their families.

1.What factors or criteria were considered by the government when it determined the annual allowable earnings amount to be 10 per cent of maximum annual pensionable earnings?

2.The Government of Canada website states that the $5400 (before taxes) earnings limit “may increase in future years”. Since 2002, has the government of Canada revisited this limit and considered changing the earnings cap?

a.If so, when was this and why was the 10 per cent of maximum pensionable earnings cap maintained?

b.If not, does the Government of Canada have plans to consider increasing the earnings cap?

3.What factors prevent the Government of Canada from allowing recipients to earn more than 10 per cent of their maximum pensionable earnings without incurring a penalty to their benefit?

No. 22.

By the Honourable Senator Runciman:

November 23, 2016—Correctional Service Canada (CSC) has many challenges to deal with, in particular providing adequate treatment and rehabilitation services for inmates who suffer from a spectrum of mental health, addiction and other social problems. CSC’s failure to fulfill its mandate is well-documented, particularly in the recommendations of the inquest into the death of Ashley Smith. It is important that CSC focus its resources on frontline services in order to maximize the use of taxpayer dollars and deliver the results Canadians expect from their government. In light of this, I request answers to the following:

1.How much was spent on preparation, production and distribution of the 2016 book “Celebrating the People of CSC”?

2.How many copies of the book were produced, how were they distributed, and how many remain undistributed?

3.How does this book contribute to CSC’s core mandate?

4.How many people were part of the Canadian delegation to the International Corrections and Prisons Associations conference in Bucharest, Romania, in October 2016, who were they, and what was the total cost of their participation, including registration, travel, food, accommodation, hospitality, and all other ancillary expenses?

5.What role did Canada’s representatives play at this conference and how did their attendance contribute to CSC’s core mandate?

No. 23.

By the Honourable Senator Downe:

December 8, 2016—With regard to goods in transit (goods passing through Canada but not destined for sale or consumption in Canada):

For the period 2010 to the present, have any such goods been diverted (whether though accident or design) from their original destination and ended up being consumed, sold, spilled or otherwise released into Canada?

And if so:

1.How many such diversions took place?

2.What were the circumstances of these diversions? Did they result from theft or were they accidental (a spill, for example)?

3.What was the impact of these diversions (health, environmental, economic)?

No. 24.

By the Honourable Senator Carignan, P.C.:

December 14, 2016—Regarding federal taxation:

1. Could the Government of Canada provide a copy of any briefing information that has been prepared since October 2015 for the Minister of Finance regarding raising the Goods and Services Tax (GST)?

2.Could the Government of Canada provide a copy of any briefing information that has been prepared since October 2015 for the Minister of Finance regarding the elimination of tax credits?

No. 25.

By the Honourable Senator Carignan, P.C.:

December 14, 2016—Regarding Ministerial Appointments:

1.Could the Government of Canada provide a list of all Ministerial appointments for each province and territory from October 2015 to November 2016?

2.Could the Government of Canada provide the name of the appointee, the appointment received, and the length of the term?

No. 26.

By the Honourable Senator Carignan, P.C.:

December 14, 2016—Regarding Governor in Council (GIC) Appointments:

1.Could the Government of Canada provide a list of all Governor in Council appointments for each province and territory from October 2015 to November 2016?

2.Could the Government of Canada provide the name of the appointee, the appointment received, and the length of the term?

No. 27.

By the Honourable Senator Carignan, P.C.:

December 14, 2016—Regarding the National Seniors Council:

1.What is the current status of the National Seniors Council?

2.If the Council is active, who are its members?

3.Is the Council currently providing advice to the Minister of Families, Children and Social Development or the Minister of Health?

No. 28.

By the Honourable Senator Carignan, P.C.:

December 14, 2016—Concerning the program Growing Forward 2 (GF2):

1.How much did the Government of Canada spend per year and per province under this program?

2.In which program sectors of activities was this money spent?

3.Does the government intend to renew this program when it expires?

No. 29.

By the Honourable Senator Carignan, P.C.:

December 14, 2016—Since November 4, 2015, how many offenders who broke Canada’s new rail safety rules have received administrative monetary penalties, what offences were reported, and who are the offenders?

No. 30.

By the Honourable Senator Carignan, P.C.:

December 14, 2016—Since November 4, 2015, how much money has Transport Canada spent, per month and per province:

•To improve safety at railway crossings;

•To improve or install automated railway safety management systems; and

•To conduct safety inspections of railway cars, locomotives, rails and other railway companies’ material and facilities?

No. 31.

By the Honourable Senator Carignan, P.C.:

December 14, 2016—What are the implementation costs estimated by the federal government for a system to legalize marijuana in Canada?

Specifically, what is the breakdown of costs estimated by the government for each of the first three years following legalization in these areas:

1.Health care:

(a)hospitalization associated to marijuana;

(b)treatment programs;

(c)awareness programs; and

(d)injuries caused by marijuana-impaired driving;

2.Justice and safety:

(a)border control;

(b)public transportation safety; and

(c)drug treatment courts.

For each category, what studies did the government use to make its cost projections?

No. 32.

By the Honourable Senator Carignan, P.C.:

December 14, 2016—What are the government’s projections concerning the number of deaths caused by marijuana-impaired driving for each of the first three years following the legalization of marijuana? What studies did the government use to make its projections?

No. 33.

By the Honourable Senator Carignan, P.C.:

December 14, 2016—Concerning the legalization of marijuana, since November 4, 2015:

1.Which groups, public organizations, individuals and governments asked to be consulted for each of the following departments: Health, Justice and Public Safety?

2.For each of the abovementioned departments, which groups, public organizations, individuals and governments were consulted?

3.What studies did the government commission?

No. 34.

By the Honourable Senator Carignan, P.C.:

December 14, 2016—Concerning Canadian citizens who are also citizens of another country:

1.What is their number and what are the details of the country where they hold another citizenship?

2.How many do not reside in Canada and what are the details of their country of residence?

No. 35.

By the Honourable Senator Carignan, P.C.:

December 14, 2016—Can the government provide the following documents and information with regards to Syrian refugees, since November 4, 2015 to the present:

(a)how many have arrived in Canada;

(b)in which regions and cities have the refugees re-settled in Canada;

(c)how many are living in temporary housing;

(d)what is the total cost of flights, accommodations, per diems and allowances;

(e)how many refugees were privately sponsored;

(f)how many refugees were government sponsored;

(g)how many are still unemployed;

(h)how many are relying on food banks;

(i)how many are men;

(j)how many are women; and

(k)how many are under the age of 18?

No. 36.

By the Honourable Senator Carignan, P.C.:

December 14, 2016—Regarding the Marine Protected Areas (MPA):

1.What is the percentage of Canada’s marine and coastal areas that are included in the MPA?

2.When will the government reach its target of five per cent?

3.Has the government conducted any study on the impact of the increase in MPA?