Andrew Stephenson

2017-10-12 07:45:48 -0400

“Maybe these fags and dikes and sodomites could learn to dress and act like everybody else in the workplace or in society but when they’re at home and nobody else can see them let them act and dress anyway they like”



And why should they adhere to your definitions of “normal”? Clothing styles, for example, are entirely arbitrary, and your definition of “normal” has no objective justification. If a guy wishes to wear women’s clothes, makeup etc, … who really cares? I understand it’s different and change can be uncomfortable, but enforcing arbitrary standards to avoid discomfort seems fundamentally incompatible with a free society. I don’t care if you’re a “sodomite” – even if various religious texts (Bible or Quran) demand you kill them. Their existence in no way interferes with you beyond hurt feelings.



I find ti amusing that the same people squawking about forced conformity are themselves pretty quick to demand the same in reverse. (to head off the inevitable accusation of hypocrisy, I agree, prosecution for the wrong pronoun is not something we should be encouraging. However, it should not be necessary and we, as a society, should be capable of respecting other people’s life choices without needing to be told to do so. Ideally we do not need to be treating people like petulant 6 year olds).

commented