Recently I received advice, from a person closely following the Trayvon Martin / George Zimmerman story, to take some researched evidence to the “main stream” media. So I did, and I’ll outline my experience below. What follows is the exact reason why the Media is no longer considered a Fourth Estate.

One thing the media never does any longer is ask questions, the “why” questions. You’ll notice the mainstream media, in a general sense, only reports on stories, and even then only on the stories they view are within the purpose of their editorial agenda; And stories fed to them from daily newswires, or occasionally consultants, which they are paid to regurgitate.

“It’s a cost vs. benefit analysis”, I was told by a local Orlando media reporter, “we have limited funding for resources, and expenses, and so the editors only want to expend money on stories that will drive income”, they continued.

As I asked whether or not they would be willing to look into information, or even consider information if it were just presented to them, the response was also oddly disjointed when you think of the original purpose of a news gathering and public interest.

“If it pertains to Trayvon Martin’s criminal behavior, or evidence of burglary, we are not interested”, I was told. “Our editors and editorial board have decided that nothing about that has anything to do with the events in Sanford”. “Nor does that have anything to do with the shooting of Trayvon Martin by George Zimmerman”.

I paused for a bit, while I was absorbing what I was being told. ‘Not interested’ in that possible criminal aspect of Trayvon Martin. But apparently, considering prior articles published, quite interested in accusations of George Zimmerman as a 6-year-old having molested a cousin. Odd, hypocrisy no?

Somehow an accusation from 20 years earlier, against one of the participants while in grade school has some bearing on a shooting on February 26th 2012; But the criminal conduct of the other participant merely months before hand does not. Again, odd reconciliation, no?

So I asked, ‘well, what aspects would be of interest’? And I was told, “if you could prove, with certainty, that Trayvon was Baker-Acted by the M-DSPD, we would be interested in that”. However, “you would have to point us to the evidence with “laser accuracy” because we will not investigate it on our own”.

Meaning, if I would put the proof of Trayvon Martin being “Baker-Acted” directly in front of them -as in ‘under their nose’- then perhaps they would be interested in that aspect. Or, “if you could prove, that Trayvon Martin had been expelled from school, we might be interested in that also”.

“But nothing more”.

When I asked them if they would be willing to question the people, that I would outline and prove, who possess specific first-hand knowledge of the corruption, hiding of information, intentional lies and manipulation. The answer was even easier for them, err, well, “no”!

When I asked them if I could prove criminal conduct had occurred, and a specific cover-up, was known to exist, and be admitted to by the participants in the cover-up with sworn ‘under oath’ affidavits to that effect, where the subjects were admitting they intentionally hid the criminal activity of Trayvon Martin, would they be interested – the answer was “No, not our concern”.

When I asked them…. if I could prove, beyond any doubt, that the same cover-up principles applied to Police Officers in Sanford Florida (near where this media outlet is located) and give them the specific evidence that outlined two Police Detectives, from SPD, who were involved in the Trayvon Martin shooting investigation, and yet participated in the intentional manipulation of evidence, would they then be interested? I continued,… for further consideration I could not only name both of the police officers but could also provide the sworn legal affidavits from other officers testifying to the intentional cover-up? Would that interest you? The answer was again, “No”, not interested.

You see folks…… People ask why the media never questions Benjamin Crump about his lies surrounding his created witness, DeeDee. Lies about her age, location, and substantive known provable lies within the story attributed to her. It’s simple, the media does not care. It diminishes the product value they are assembling.

So when the legal system is corrupt, when those within “the system” can do anything, say anything, hide anything, and falsify anything, then what possible hope can anyone have of finding justice from within the same system.

When the criminal justice system is defined around Law and Order; Where “Law” is the legal enforcement mechanism, and “Order” is the judicial application of whether a consequence for violation of the criminal statute(s) should apply…..

……Yet the ‘law’ half of the equation is corrupt and acting unlawfully; And the ‘order’ half is complicit in the corruption, such that they do not care -and/or even assist in the facilitation of the corruption; Then what recourse is available for someone entangled within it?

Combine that with a “free press” who really does not care about guarding the fourth estate and holding truth to power; A press who willfully and intentionally refuse to even discuss the fraud, corruption and intentional abuses of power, let alone inform the public about it, then what hope really exists?

The Media is waiting on a finished product to bring them revenue.

The Law (Police) are assembling the construct of that product for them to sell.

The Order (Judiciary) is determining the value of that product.

The product is human, but the actual opinion of the product itself as to whether or not he chooses to be sold – is, well, irrelevant….. the human lost right to that opinion when they entered the process….. and so the product is easily de-humanized by those who draw benefit from the transaction.