Download raw source

MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.98.132 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 07:47:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.98.132 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 07:47:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <BL2PR03MB116E283D39459B795A5CED3DDF50@BL2PR03MB116.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> References: <3FFEE8C8-AB4F-4F76-9936-0E1EB350F9AE@presidentclinton.com> <1CABCC9A-0780-4A20-B5A6-0B10C4F91F8D@presidentclinton.com> <BL2PR03MB116E283D39459B795A5CED3DDF50@BL2PR03MB116.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 10:47:03 -0400 Delivered-To: john.podesta@gmail.com Message-ID: <CAE6FiQ-4yXw1jyMevhiWmW0L2ah4pnPWgNG9iendgBSRmRS2XA@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Victor Pinchuk From: John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com> To: Huma Abedin <huma@hrcoffice.com> CC: Dan Schwerin <dschwerin@hrcoffice.com>, Jon Davidson <Jon@presidentclinton.com>, Amitabh Desai <ami@presidentclinton.com>, Tina Fluornoy <Tina@presidentclinton.com>, Jake Sullivan <jake.sullivan@gmail.com>, Margaret Steenburg <Margaret@presidentclinton.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bdc1a282c11470512828e52 --047d7bdc1a282c11470512828e52 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 No is better. Is that viable? On Mar 30, 2015 10:02 AM, "Huma Abedin" <huma@hrcoffice.com> wrote: > Ok > ________________________________________ > From: Tina Flournoy <Tina@presidentclinton.com> > Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 9:58:55 AM > To: Amitabh Desai > Cc: Jon Davidson; Margaret Steenburg; Jake Sullivan; Dan Schwerin; Huma > Abedin; John Podesta > Subject: Re: Victor Pinchuk > > Team HRC - we'll get back to you on this > > > > > On Mar 30, 2015, at 9:53 AM, Amitabh Desai <ami@presidentclinton.com> > wrote: > > > > Victor Pinchuk is relentlessly following up (including this morning) > about a meeting with WJC in London or anywhere in Europe. Ideally he wants > to bring together a few western leaders to show support for Ukraine, with > WJC probably their most important participant. If that's not palatable for > us, then he'd like a bilat with WJC. > > > > If it's not next week, that's fine, but he wants a date. I keep saying > we have no Europe plans, although we do have those events in London in > June. Are folks comfortable offering Victor a private meeting on one of > those dates? At this point I get the impression that although I keep saying > WJC cares about Ukraine, Pinchuk feels like WJC hasn't taken enough action > to demonstrate that, particularly during this existential moment for the > county and for him. > > > > I sense this is so important because Pinchuk is under Putin's heel right > now, feeling a great degree of pressure and pain for his many years of > nurturing stronger ties with the West. > > > > I get all the downsides and share the concerns. I am happy to go back > and say no. It would just be good to know what WJC (and HRC and you all) > would like to do, because this will likely impact the future of this > relationship, and slow walking our reply will only reinforce his growing > angst. > > > > Thanks, and sorry for the glum note on a Monday morning... > --047d7bdc1a282c11470512828e52 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <p dir=3D"ltr">No is better. Is that viable?</p> <div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mar 30, 2015 10:02 AM, "Huma Abedin"= ; <<a href=3D"mailto:huma@hrcoffice.com">huma@hrcoffice.com</a>> wrot= e:<br type=3D"attribution"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margi= n:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Ok<br> ________________________________________<br> From: Tina Flournoy <<a href=3D"mailto:Tina@presidentclinton.com">Tina@p= residentclinton.com</a>><br> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 9:58:55 AM<br> To: Amitabh Desai<br> Cc: Jon Davidson; Margaret=C2=A0 Steenburg; Jake Sullivan; Dan Schwerin; Hu= ma Abedin; John Podesta<br> Subject: Re: Victor Pinchuk<br> <br> Team HRC - we'll get back to you on this<br> <br> <br> <br> > On Mar 30, 2015, at 9:53 AM, Amitabh Desai <<a href=3D"mailto:ami@p= residentclinton.com">ami@presidentclinton.com</a>> wrote:<br> ><br> > Victor Pinchuk is relentlessly following up (including this morning) a= bout a meeting with WJC in London or anywhere in Europe. Ideally he wants t= o bring together a few western leaders to show support for Ukraine, with WJ= C probably their most important participant. If that's not palatable fo= r us, then he'd like a bilat with WJC.<br> ><br> > If it's not next week, that's fine, but he wants a date. I kee= p saying we have no Europe plans, although we do have those events in Londo= n in June. Are folks=C2=A0 comfortable offering Victor a private meeting on= one of those dates? At this point I get the impression that although I kee= p saying WJC cares about Ukraine, Pinchuk feels like WJC hasn't taken e= nough action to demonstrate that, particularly during this existential mome= nt for the county and for him.<br> ><br> > I sense this is so important because Pinchuk is under Putin's heel= right now, feeling a great degree of pressure and pain for his many years = of nurturing stronger ties with the West.<br> ><br> > I get all the downsides and share the concerns. I am happy to go back = and say no. It would just be good to know what WJC (and HRC and you all) wo= uld like to do, because this will likely impact the future of this relation= ship, and slow walking our reply will only reinforce his growing angst.<br> ><br> > Thanks, and sorry for the glum note on a Monday morning...<br> </blockquote></div> --047d7bdc1a282c11470512828e52--