The attorney general of Tennessee Friday announced that the state would pull out of the 10-state coalition that had threatened to challenge the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program in courts.

In a letter to Tennessee's two GOP senators, Lamar Alexander Andrew (Lamar) Lamar AlexanderChamber of Commerce endorses McSally for reelection Trump health officials grilled over reports of politics in COVID-19 response Now is the time to renew our focus on students and their futures MORE and Bob Corker Robert (Bob) Phillips CorkerHas Congress captured Russia policy? Tennessee primary battle turns nasty for Republicans Cheney clashes with Trump MORE, Attorney General Herbert H. Slatery III (R) said, "At this time, our office has decided not to challenge DACA in the litigation, because we believe there is a better approach."

That leaves Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, Kansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, South Carolina and West Virginia in the coalition led by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R).

In June, Paxton led that group in a letter that demanded President Trump rescind DACA by Sept. 5, or the states would file a lawsuit against its legality.

ADVERTISEMENT

Under pressure from that deadline, Trump plans to announce his decision whether to defend or rescind the program on Tuesday.

Several administration officials, including White House chief of staff John Kelly John Francis KellyMORE, said they didn't believe DACA would survive a lawsuit, and Attorney General Jeff Sessions Jefferson (Jeff) Beauregard SessionsTrump's policies on refugees are as simple as ABCs Ocasio-Cortez, Velázquez call for convention to decide Puerto Rico status White House officials voted by show of hands on 2018 family separations: report MORE declined to say whether he would mount a defense in court.

A similar lawsuit by 26 states against Deferred Action for Parents of Americans (DAPA), DACA's sister program, successfully obtained an injunction against DAPA in a case that ultimately ended in a 4-4 Supreme Court tie, effectively killing that program.

"We have every reason to believe the states' legal challenge to the DACA program would yield a similar outcome. It suffers from the same constitutional infirmities," wrote Slatery on Friday.

"There is a human element to this, however, that is not lost on me and should not be ignored," he added.

Slatery told Alexander and Corker that in light of DACA recipients' "outstanding accomplishments and laudable ambitions," his office now favors a legislative solution.

Several proposals have been filed in both houses of Congress to permanently enshrine in legislation DACA benefits, including a renewed version of the Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors (DREAM) Act, first presented by Sens. Lindsey Graham Lindsey Olin GrahamSenate Republicans face tough decision on replacing Ginsburg Democratic senator calls for eliminating filibuster, expanding Supreme Court if GOP fills vacancy What Senate Republicans have said about election-year Supreme Court vacancies MORE (R-S.C.) and Dick Durbin Richard (Dick) Joseph DurbinMcConnell focuses on confirming judicial nominees with COVID-19 talks stalled Senate Republicans signal openness to working with Biden Top GOP senator calls for Biden to release list of possible Supreme Court picks MORE (D-Ill.).

"Whether this particular legislation is a viable solution is a matter for congressional debate," said Slatery. "It is not a comprehensive answer to our immigration policy challenges, but it would be a very good start."

Tennessee's change of heart comes as Trump weighs pressure from his base against a growing number of voices supportive of the fundamentals of DACA, if not necessarily its legality.

Democrats and some Republicans, like Graham, had long spoken in favor of DACA and its beneficiaries.

They were joined by Speaker Paul Ryan Paul Davis RyanKenosha will be a good bellwether in 2020 At indoor rally, Pence says election runs through Wisconsin Juan Williams: Breaking down the debates MORE (R-Wis.) Friday, who said Trump should leave DACA in place and allow Congress to legislate on the matter, while arguing that President Obama exceeded his powers in installing it in the first place.