In principle, Diana welcomes the development of the moon and its benefits because It is necessary for the future of mankind.

However, the Diana project wishes to build something that does not exclude people in the right to the benefits of developing the Moon, which is clearly a common human heritage.

Therefore, Diana can be a ‘win-win plan’ for countries and companies that want to develop the moon and secure the rights to do so.



The countries and organizations that are currently active in the development of the moon face the following situation.



Countries with advanced spaceflight capabilities such as the United States, Russia, China, India, Japan, and Europe are active in establishing their own laws against the UN Outer Space Treaty to preempt ownership of the Moon.

However, we cannot stop the public rage against monopolizing the benefits of Moon development.

Therefore, it is necessary to find an optimal solution for the securing of the rights of development for the Moon and the distribution of the value of human common heritage.



How can Diana be the optimal solution?



Let's compare with a case where the state needs private land for road construction.

If there is private land where development is needed to build infrastructure, the state will provide land compensation and land to individuals.

Land compensation is covered by a national tax, citizens sell the corresponding land to the government to create profit, and the surrounding land prices also rise.

The government will gain additional revenue from infrastructure while people will have a more convenient life, which is a win-win for both sides.



The same logic applies to the Diana project.

In other words, Diana will support citizens' ownership, and compensation will be made by purchasing tokens from Moon owners who have them.

Therefore, the countries and companies that are developing the Moon can establish cooperation systems with Diana to secure the right to develop the common heritage at the minimum price without conflict.