Yesterday, I spent some time migrating my vanilla Emacs configuration to Doom Emacs. The whole process took me about 2 hours, and then today I spent another hour or so figuring out why my original configurations felt different, and tweaked it back to my liking.

For reference, here is my original .emacs.d (now archived), and my current configuration lives in my home git repository.

Why Doom Emacs?

Why did I bother? I was in the midst of configuring my LaTeX editing environment for writing my Final Year Project report, and wasn’t having a good time. Despite my attempts at being careful, the company completion backends weren’t added in the order that I wanted. I’m no beginner at Emacs. I’ve been using it for a while, and it’s still frustrating that I can’t get these little things right.

I needed a configuration that worked, so I studied Doom Emacs’ LaTeX module for inspiration. I figured it’d be easier if I just gave Doom Emacs a try, and see if I liked it.

Doom and Spacemacs are configuration kits, which allows one to use a heavily customized Emacs that works out of the box. I don’t belong in that category: I prefer a small configuration, with only the things I need. My configuration started out with a large number of additional packages, but I’ve been gradually removing them in favour of in-built Emacs functionality. For example, improvements to isearch in Emacs 27 has allowed me to replace heavier options like swiper .

But Doom offers more than a nice, loaded starting configuration. There’s a lot of machinery underneath that makes Doom Emacs fast. When I first loaded Doom, I was surprised at how much faster it was in terms of responsiveness and load speed. I couldn’t go back. I decided to use Doom for this machinery, choosing only a small subset of its provided modules.

A big factor in making this decision was that Doom’s organization is how similar it is to how I originally managed my configuration:

Doom uses straight.el to manage packages, which was also my practice Doom uses use-package heavily, and so do I

This made the migration seem less daunting . Using Doom has brought me these benefits:

Doom starts up really quickly, which means less waiting time. This is especially important for me because I use exwm, and the time Emacs loads is the time I can start using my computer. Doom has awesome default modules, including for writing, and programming. With Doom I’m able to par down my own configuration even further, and focus on customizing the things I really care about, like my Org workflow. Everything works the same, but feels snappier, and with less config! All pros and no cons!

The Migration Process

First, I followed the instructions in the README to install Doom Emacs:

git clone https://github.com/hlissner/doom-emacs ~/.emacs.d ~/.emacs.d/bin/doom install

Next, I looked through Doom’s generated init.el . Doom starts out with a configuration using evil-mode everywhere. I played around with it for a while, but figured that I’m still much more efficient with just the usual Emacs keybindings, so I ended up turning it off. I’m pleasantly surprised that Doom works just as well without evil-mode . I tweaked init.el to contain only modules that I use.

It took me a while to understand how Doom worked, but it became clear that packages.el contains packages and their recipes, and everything else should go into config.el . I began slowly copying things from my configuration over into the .doom.d/config.el file, following a small mental checklist.

Is this really necessary? Is this already handled by a Doom module (glancing at init.el )? Are the keybindings I’m using here important to me? Doom places most of the configuration behind its leader key C-c , but that also makes certain frequent interactive commands (like my agenda) further away than I hoped.

When I decide to copy something over, the basic process goes like this:

Copy the use-package declaration, replacing use-package with use-package! , Doom’s own macro. Move the recipe into packages.el Migrate bindings to the :init section of the use-package! macro, using Doom’s map! macro. Make sure the package is lazy loaded, by adding autoloads via :commands in use-package , or similar. I find inspiration for these by looking through the modules Doom ships with. Reload and test my configuration with C-h r r , or doom/reload

Configuring Doom’s Defaults

Doom’s defaults can be a bit strange, and it’s important to know where these settings are set, and how to have them changed. For example, I noticed that when composing mail using Doom’s notmuch module, hard line breaks are added in paragraphs. This makes for a terrible mobile reading experience. How do we figure out what’s going on?

First, I look at what modes are enabled via C-h m . That quickly reveals the culprit to be auto-fill-mode , which doesn’t occur in my config.el . To figure out what’s turning it on, I navigate to the .emacs.d folder and do a project-wide search for “auto-fill-mode”. Doom exposes its search functionality on prefix key “s”, so for me this is C-c s s . I quickly found that Doom’s core-editor module turns on auto-fill-mode on all text-based modes. Doom provides an alternative word-wrap module that uses soft line-breaks, so I added the following to remove auto-fill-mode , and enable word-wrap-mode on message-mode buffers:

( remove-hook 'text-mode-hook #' auto-fill-mode ) ( add-hook 'message-mode-hook #' word-wrap-mode )

Conclusion

Migrating to Doom has increased the speed of my Emacs configuration, despite it behaving nearly the same. My configuration reduced from 1800 lines to 600 lines, containing the (Org-mode-related) tweaks that make this Emacs configuration truly mine. My experience with Doom on Emacs keybindings so far has been good, and things work just like I expect them to!