









































Every so often we have group calls with top pro players to provide updates on things like game settings, share announcement details, and more. One of these calls took place yesterday, and it was really productive. We were not only able to talk about the exciting news we had but we also had an open and honest conversation about the settings process.While we’ve made a lot of progress so far with the addition of some community Forge maps, the addition of Oddball, and the removal of Spartan Charge and Ground Pound, players expressed wanting to also add CTF on Outpost. Outpost should sound familiar, it was one of the stellar Forge maps we were fortunate enough to test this off season for HCS consideration. Ultimately, it didn’t make the cut and it was partially because it didn’t play very well on the standard CTF rules that exist within Halo 5/HCS. It also didn’t hit our aesthetics bar which is particularly important for maintaining our viewer experience goals. Gameplay is absolutely the most important factor when deciding which maps to go with, but viewership is a key goal for the HCS and so aesthetic quality is something we must consider as well (amongst other things like framerate, etc). We needed to make a decision on which maps we could move forward with in order to begin the polish phase, and we decided to move forward with Echelon and Fissure - both of which are continuing to perform well and see improvements each day.Halo 5 has only ever had one CTF ruleset in the core Arena mode suites since the game launched, which has allowed for a consistent and easy to understand playing and viewing experience. With that being said, we’re open to exploring other CTF rulesets today, but we need to make sure we’re thinking about the impact it has on player and viewing experience. How do we communicate to players that rules are different on one map vs another? How do viewers at home understand that as well? These are some of the things that we have to keep in mind as we evaluate changes to rulesets.We told the pros that we’d have some discussions with various teams here at 343 and get back to them with an update as soon as we can. So, here’s the update: we’ll be changing our plans for the settings update process a bit to start testing new CTF rules for Outpost. While StrongSide has already run some initial tests today with pros, the official testing period kicks off on Monday, May 21. By next week, we should be able to share more details on the specific rulesets we’ll be testing.In terms of aesthetics, the Forger pwn jones has done an absolutely astonishing job of updating Outpost to look more modern. It looks so different in fact, he actually changed the name to Sanctum. Don’t take my word for it though, you can see the latest photos in his tweet here . The Forgers of all of these maps continue to be the real MVPs of this whole process, as the iteration we’ve seen to improve these maps in such a short period of time has been nothing short of incredible.Finally, one of our goals for this whole process was to improve Fathom in some fashion to address issues surrounding general gameplay leading to ties/standoffs. While we’re still just testing CTF on Sanctum/Outpost, if it were to be added, it would replace CTF on Fathom in the official rotation.Again, we’ll keep everyone posted on the latest throughout this whole process. Don’t forget to follow @StrongSide to get in on playtest or watch those that are streaming and leave your feedback as well. Have a great weekend!-Tashi