Date Mon, 09 Sep 2019 04:47:48 +0000 From gameonlinux@redchan ... Subject Why isn't Grsecurity being sued for its long standing GPL violations? Hi, RMS and Bruce Perens;



I noticed that recently Grsecurity's Brad Spengler (who sued you, Bruce,

for speaking the truth), decided to "Flex" and basically advertise while

chastising the linux community:



news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20874470





Another poster then pointed out the history of Grsecurity's copyright

violations (as a derivative work that is restricting redistribution),

but said he didn't want to say to much, because he didn't want to get

sued. He referenced your good write-up on the situation:

perens.com/2017/06/28/warning-grsecurity-potential-contributory-infringement-risk-for-customers/



(Which has not changed)



Why isn't Grsecurity being sued for it's copyright violations? They've

been going on for years now. Clearly their scheme works: it can be shown

to a court both the attempt to restrict redistribution was tendered (the

agreement) and that said attempt has been successful.



Also isn't Open Source Security simply an alter-ego of Brad Spengler?

Him being the only employee? Couldn't the corporate veil be pierced and

he be found personally liable for any damages?



