



Many Germans know her for witty, thought-provoking articles and columns on Germany's political challenges, with works such as her open letters "Sie, Frau Merkel, gehören ins Gefängnis!" (You, Miss Merkel, belong in prison!) and "Ein Liebesbrief an die Vergangenheit" (A love-letter to the past) targeting a very difficult to handle audience - modern day Germans.



On February 10th, she published her final work - " Susanne Kablitz was a German Libertarian politician, publicist and owner of her own publishing company. She has been fighting for her country on multiple fronts simultaneously for truth and reason.Many Germans know her for witty, thought-provoking articles and columns on Germany's political challenges, with works such as her open letters "Sie, Frau Merkel, gehören ins Gefängnis!" (You, Miss Merkel, belong in prison!) and "Ein Liebesbrief an die Vergangenheit" (A love-letter to the past) targeting a very difficult to handle audience - modern day Germans.On February 10th, she published her final work - " Dieses Land ist unrettbar verloren " (Germany is Lost Beyond Hope) and killed herself the next day, after leaving behind that last message to Germany.

Here is a translation of that message:

Germany is Lost Beyond Hope

There is this day in the life of every man when he becomes perfectly sure of a certain thing. When he is 100% certain that things will come the way he never wanted them to come. Such a day is, on one hand, depressing, but on the other hand, tremendously liberating. Because you know that you won't be able to do anything against the progression of history. No matter what you write or say or do.

Many decades ago, Ludwig von Mises was in a similar situation. At the time, he said, that he wanted to contribute to the enlightenment, foresight, and prudence in the world, but merely ended up becoming "the chronicler of its downfall"

This realization has touched me deeply and, a long time ago, led me to dedicate an entire chapter of my novel to it.

Meanwhile, I also feel this way - because no matter whatever you try: Most people in the world (at least going by the experiences I've had) have an unshakable belief in authority, in the God that is the state, in the cult of guilt, in self-denial, and are deeply entrenched in their hatred towards themselves.

No matter how much you point at the fact that most people are on their direct way to hell - nothing changes. The opposite happens. You are being insulted, ridiculed, and disavowed.

A few weeks ago, at an event in Dresden regarding the German cult of guilt, the national socialist Bernd Höcke made some comments. He said, among other things: "We Germans, our people, we are the only people in the world who erected a memorial of shame in the heart of our capital city." and "the government of Merkel mutated to a regime. Neither habit nor her flowers of speech make a meaningful difference between Angela Merkel and Erich Honecker", Höhe said while listeners shouted "Merkel must go!".

One thing was clear: Immediately afterwards, the storm of outrage arrived. Coming from people from his own ranks as well as outsiders.

And you might wonder why.

I am truly not a fan of Bernd Höcke. Like all national socialists, he also wants the overbearing, all-encompassing state. He wants to have it in a different way than the Green-Leftist fraction, but he wants to have it at least as much.

With a Höcke on top, nothing would change for the better. Because he also wants total power. The power he considers right, the power he considers as "good" when it rules over other people.

But this should not be the topic here. What is much more astounding is the realization that allegedly "middle-class" and even freedom-minded people immediately wallow in guilt as soon as they think they recognize a "Nazi" who has, in one way or the other, the inexcusable audacity to spread the dirt of the criminals of all regimes a bit more equally and fight against the eternal groveling before the thousand-year Nazi guilt under Hitler and return to something like a reasonable way of dealing with the past.

"Never, never, never" should we forget, an acquaintance of mine wrote on Facebook. Other people vehemently support this mindset.

The criticism towards the Holocaust craze reaches adventurous heights - especially regarding the double standard.

Of course one should not relativise what happened in Germany seven decades ago - just as unrelativised it is in all other dictatorships, regimes, and governments. Just like there has been a bombing of Dresden by the Brits (when there has been not the slightest reason to do it - and in which approx. a quarter of a million people, the vast majority of them defenseless, unarmed people were slaughtered) or the "Killing Fields" in Cambodia or the killing of people in the former DDR or the mass killings in the Soviet Union or in China or the dropping of the nuclear bombs by the Americans or, or, or.

But! Do you witness such a kind of subjugation of people alive today because of the actions of crazy people in any other country? Neither in Russia, nor in China, nor in Cambodia, nor in the former DDR, and especially not in England or America.

What is the most astounding is that, remarkably often, the same people who show the most outrage about "Nazis" are the ones who support the massive influx of people of Muslim belief in every aspect. The latter being exactly those people who have massive "problems" with the Jewish belief.

Bernd Höcke has frequently made comments regarding this fact. Such as a few weeks ago, when he voiced his concern that the "Holocaust denier" Ursula Haverbeck had to expect more severe consequences than a "refugee" who is found guilty of committing a crime.

Even back then, there was outrage. Was that because something that "shouldn't" be said was said (whoever defines such a thing) or was that because the sense of decency was ignored or was that because political correctness was violated? And what's with the right to free expression? Does that not exist here? Or only in a limited way? And who sets such a thing?

Let's look into this: What did Mr. Höcke really say?

In the first part of his statement, he raised attention to the fact that the German cult of guilt has reached hysterical levels. He says: "We Germans, our people, we are the only people in the world who erected a memorial of shame in the heart of our capital city."

Where is this sentence wrong? Where is it ambiguous as long as you have a clear mind?

When he says that Germany erected a memorial of shame, then it is a completely different statement than saying that IT IS a shame that this memorial has been erected here.

Many people will probably not understand this, because they don't know anything about verbal clarity or the ability to differentiate.

He does not leave any room for doubt when he calls the memorial a memorial of shame. He does not deny the Holocaust, nor does he relativise it. He would never do such a thing anyway; he, as an advocate for the authoritarian state, would never say something that would go against the profiteers of written (and found in the feeling of guilt which has been implanted in every last nook and cranny inside the brain of every German) German history.

He does not complain about the objective examination of the, allegedly, fully examined 12 years of the Third Reich - no, he complains about the cult of guilt. He wants a "proud German Volk" again.

Well, I don't want a "deutsches Volk" again, but I'd like to see proud people.

People who don't contribute to a forced and collectively governed guilt. Who morally reject that people are being treated as second-class humans for collective reasons and not because it is the "reason of the state".

Who understand guilt as an individual construct. Not as a liability of kin. Who don't let others talk them into feeling guilt, but experience it for themselves - if it is truly real... and only then. Who don't let themselves be put under pressure, who are authentic and honest and don't act ritualistically. Who advocate for their own, incorruptible opinion, not the one that, if you don't have it, is punished with prison time.

Guilt is something personal. To recognize guilt is an individual decision, an individual confession. Something that one has to live with INDIVIDUALLY, when you recognize it, and also when you don't recognize it. Guilt is not something which may be forced onto others who don't have it. Others who you may vilify as bad people when they don't accept this guilt.

People should voluntarily remember something and then act according to it; when they are being forced to do it, it is dishonest and has nothing to do with a real feeling, just with political correctness and kowtowing to the cult of guilt.

And what does he say in the second part of his statement? Well, he says that a "crime of opinion" is worse than a true violation of the law.

Well, both statements are correct. And they are not allowed to be said. And especially not by a Bernd Höcke. And not because he is a socialist, but because he is "national".

National socialists are out. International socialists are en vogue. A good example for that is the former President Barack Obama. International socialists are allowed to kill people, they are allowed to wage war, they are allowed to violate the law. National ones aren't.

This double standard is disgusting.

Adolf Hitler was a national socialist, that's what they like to tell us. But this is not true - in two ways. Because Adolf Hitler wanted - in the mid or long term - a unified Europe. Under his rule. A construct under which people who don't share the mindset of the ruler have almost no way to escape. Who have no refuge, no alternative. Who have to stay - and follow.

National socialists didn't want that. They wanted a "fatherland". This is foolish and childish as well, but at least it still gives you the possibility to pursue happiness elsewhere when you don't want to go with this craze.

And the only thing which seemed to be "right" [as in, the right on the "left-right spectrum", not right meaning "true" or "correct"] about Adolf Hitler was his fervid anti-Semitism which was coupled with a manic anti-Americanism.

It was his hatred towards capitalism, towards "Jewish" speculators, towards "rich Jews", towards the entire "financial Jewry". It was exactly the thing that connects him to almost all socialists, i.e. leftists. Every thing that he lived, said, or did, was leftist. Every pore of him was "left".

I will never understand how you can tell thinking men that Hitler was "right", the only explanation I can come up with is total brainwashing.

What did Roland Baader once say considering this connection?

Socialism is an infectious mental illness. Those who have it can be identified from the fact that they want to establish an authoritarian system and think that doing so would be pure justice, and then treat everyone who does not want to subjugate himself under that with aggression. ​

​

Let's also talk about the third statement of Höcke. He said that Mrs. Merkel, in her behavior, is reminiscent of her spiritual father Erich Honecker. Again, earsplitting outrage.

But why? That's exactly what's being the case. It's even worse.

Packaged in an alleged democracy, the freedoms of man are being expropriated more and more every single day. Mrs. Merkel and her entourage are committing massive violations of the law, are making calls for denunciation, are using taxpayers' money to create government agencies of opinion control in which even former Stasi employees have leading positions, are forcing a way of life onto the majority of the population which makes them poorer and more dependent, and are robbing them of, meanwhile, up to 70% of their monthly income.

So why is there outrage?

Meanwhile, the people in this country are so desperate that they are clinging to a Martin Schulz. But how mentally degenerated do you have to be to do such a thing? How hard must you have hit rock bottom?

People are tearing their mouths open about the "dumb people" who made no resistance to the "Third Reich". Even though the former are EXACTLY THOSE who would have joined it. Running after their "Führer" who promised them the world. Exactly this group of people is now lamenting over democracy and is thus talking about diversity... but only wants both of these things when things go according to their small-minded view on the world.

And no, there is no "big mind" hidden in the people who shout towards Multikulti and verbally destroy all those who hold a different opinion. A "big mind" should have shown itself if those people had been outraged because of the bad deeds of Obama, Clinton & co. THEN there would be character. But right now, they are only dismal pitiful creatures who don't even have one iota of moral principles.

As an example, look at this gentleman: Michael Müller, mayor of the bankrupt city of Berlin.

A total loser who has, in his entire life, not worked one day to create value, and is only allowed to finally ruin the most bankrupt cesspool of Germany because of a coalition with Green fascists and Wall murderers.

This "fine gentleman" might not be able to differentiate between a wall that is used to lock in your own population and a wall which should protect them from criminals, but this inability does not stop him from explaining to an elected US President how the world works . These living moral and intellectual embarrassments who can be found in Germany and praise themselves and each other as the "political elite" and give each other awards and prizes (which, by the way, is also a characteristic of all socialist and communist governments) are just cringe-worthy.

What else is there to realise?

Well, the saving of banks and the saving of the Euro, bureaucracy madness, exploding crime rates, warmongering, government television, record-breaking tax rates, outlawing of light bulbs, Energiewende, surveillance state, terrorism, harassment of smokers and drivers and self-employed and entrepreneurs, gender madness - there is no day in which we are not being confronted with the total failure of the governments. And at the same time we have to witness and experience that this cancer called "state" is spreading itself further and further.

And why is this happening?

Well, this is probably because of how the majority of people are reacting to these cute little "incidents". Lethargic, full of guilt, suppressed. The perfect people under a ruler. You could say that this part of the population deserves what's being done to them. Because they don't want to see the parallels to the events of the past.

For a long time, I have defended against the point that these people deserve their doom. But I don't do that anymore. They are really to blame for that.

And that is going to be the case again: In September, the majority is going to elect one of the "big" parties again, because they have been successfully persuaded that every vote for a small party is a wasted vote and nobody who believes in "democracy" (unfortunately the majority of this people) would want to waste his allegedly valuable (but truly completely worthless) vote.

Almost nobody listens when you ask them to examine the "Energiewende", the "Saving of the Euro" and the "Refugee Crisis" more carefully. You can even publish books which come to the perfectly convinced and fact-based conclusion that every single problem, on its own, already suffices to completely destroy Germany.

But how do people react?

Disbelief, exclamation of ridicule, and the label of the Debbie Downer and conspiracy theorist. Almost nobody wants to escape from his belief to the almightiness of government propaganda. Most people prefer to believe instead of know. And that's why you can tell them all sorts of things. And that's the same people who get heated over those in the 30s of the past century. Who want to retroactively correct their mistakes.

And while they do that, they make even worse mistakes.

Because who tells these people that, back then, there have also been people who warned that, not only then, there were people who have been warning for the "opinion of the state"? Who have defended themselves? And who have been vilified, ridiculed, and mocked because of that?

But in their moral arrogance, the people of today cannot imagine that in the least. Because they are allegedly better people. What a mockery!

An especially disgusting example for a dishonest "Gutmenschentum" is the "modern" political asylum industry. A mostly corrupt organization which is successfully disguising criminal activity using all sorts of Newspeak: Help, those who seek protection, refugees , traumatized, charity, social justice, and all other sorts of cotton candy for the brain.

The political help and asylum industry is meanwhile, by far, the largest industry in Germany, far larger than the highest revenue DAX corporation. With so many profiteers, it is not puzzling that the government thief manages to recruit a few protesters for the alleged "fight against the right" among the exploiters.

And because the Germans are so tremendously brainwashed, there are a few people in these protests who don't even profit at all. They are the useful idiots of the asylum industry and the politicians who go to the elections under the banner of "social justice". Because these two "professions" are, by far, the most greedy, two-faced, and unethical exploiters that exist.

And it's truly unbelievable!

Again, we live in a fascist Dictatorship modeled after 1933, today's Nazis are Gutmenschen drunk on refugees and asocial "Anti-Fascists". Whoever speaks the truth gets persecuted. It's just a question of time when there will be dead bodies on both sides. The SPD [socialist democratic party of Germany] has openly called to violence and wants to provide the Federal President as well as the Federal Chancellor.

It truly is a panopticon of pitifulness.

Unfortunately, you can't avoid realizing that this incredibly embarrassing country truly deserves its inevitable downfall. Germany is lost. Definitely. To reverse this would perhaps only be possible - maybe - with extremely drastic actions.

Which NO party is brave enough to do. Because they are all just staring at the majority. Staring at the feeding troughs. Because there, they're well cared for. And because they have no spine to resist a temporary outrage and firmly stand by their own principles. There's always someone who comes and talks about the next elections. That you want and need to win. And that you shouldn't jeopardize your allegedly reached goals by hurting the "soul of the people". And in that moment, all of them are sold to the Devil. And not even for a good price.

It's just disgusting. May it come soon and may it be final, because whoever does not learn from the previous downfall has not deserved a third chance.

Perhaps things can go well at some point afterwards. With people who walk upright and are self-assured and are no longer drunk on the state. Those who have fallen by the wayside are just the victims.

But - I hope - at least for a good cause.