Judge George Daniels said Saudi Arabia had sovereign immunity from damage claims by families of nearly 3,000 people killed in the attacks

This article is more than 4 years old

This article is more than 4 years old

Zacarias Moussaoui says al-Qaida was backed by Saudi Arabia. But can he be believed? Read more

A US judge on Tuesday dismissed claims against Saudi Arabia by families of victims of the September 11, 2001, attacks, who accused the country of providing material support to al Qaeda.



US district judge George Daniels in Manhattan said Saudi Arabia had sovereign immunity from damage claims by families of nearly 3,000 people killed in the attacks, and from insurers that covered losses suffered by building owners and businesses.

“The allegations in the complaint alone do not provide this court with a basis to assert jurisdiction over defendants,” Daniels wrote.

The victims had sought to supplement their case with new allegations to avoid that result, including based on testimony they secured from Zacarias Moussaoui, a former al Qaeda operative imprisoned for his role in the attacks.

Daniels said even if he allowed the plaintiffs to assert those new claims, doing so would be “futile, however, because the additional allegations do not strip defendants of sovereign immunity.“

Lawyers for the plaintiffs did not immediately respond to requests for comment. A lawyer for Saudi Arabia declined comment.

‘You can’t make us be foreign’: young Muslim leaders who were shaped by 9/11 Read more

The ruling came just over 14 years after the September 11 2001 attacks, in which airliners were hijacked by al Qaeda militants.

Most of the 19 attackers were Saudi nationals who hijacked planes and flew them into the World Trade Center in New York, the Pentagon near Washington DC, and into a field in Pennsylvania after passengers revolted.

The case against Saudi Arabia has had a complicated history, with trial judges including Daniels twice before ruling Saudi Arabia was entitled to immunity under the federal Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act.

But in 2013, the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals in New York revived the lawsuit, in light of a 2011 decision that allowed similar claims to proceed against Afghanistan.