The world of archaeology was electrified last year by the news that Tutankhamun’s tomb could contain hidden chambers possibly containing the remains and riches of Queen Nefertiti. It was a story that seemed to have everything: false walls, buried treasure, at least one mummy – and new hope for Egypt’s ailing tourist industry.

Tutankhamun's secret? Experts hope new chambers could contain tomb of Nefertiti Read more

There was just one problem: the announcement now seems to be unfounded. But scientists say the evidence, based on new research, is being suppressed by the government in Cairo.



The announcement in November by the then minister of antiquities, Mamdouh Eldamaty, that he was “90% positive” that an earlier radar scan of the tomb had revealed an unexplored chamber, galvanised worldwide excitement, and seemed to add weight to the theory of a British Egyptologist, Richard Reeves, that the tomb was also the intact burial site of Nefertiti, widely believed to be Tutankhamun’s stepmother and who may have preceded him as pharaoh.

A second scan was carried out this year using advanced ground-penetrating radar technology and was organised by the National Geographical Society (NGS), which said it sent the report to the Egyptian ministry of antiquities.

Facebook Twitter Pinterest A 3,300-year-old limestone bust of Queen Nefertiti. Photograph: Robert Michael/AFP/Getty

However, the ministry has not revealed the findings, raising suspicions that they disprove the original claim, and triggering political infighting in Cairo. Eldamaty was replaced in March.

Dean Goodman, a California-based geophysicist who analysed the data from the new scan, said he was unable to comment due to a non-disclosure agreement with NGS. But he was earlier quoted by the National Geographic website as saying that no hollow chamber had been found. “If we had a void, we should have a strong reflection,” he said. “But it just doesn’t exist. Radar data can often be subjective. But at this particular site, it’s not. It’s nice at such an important site to have clear, convincing results.”

An NGS spokeswoman said: “National Geographic scans and Goodman’s review of them were shared with the Egyptian ministry of antiquities. Any questions about the National Geographic scan results should be directed to the ministry.”

However, there was no answer on Thursday at the ministry’s press office telephone number, and an email bounced back with an automated message saying the email address was no longer valid. There has been no response to a request for comment from Reeves, a senior Egyptologist at the University of Arizona.

Facebook Twitter Pinterest King Tutankhamun in his burial chamber in the Valley of the Kings. Photograph: Khaled Desouki/AFP/Getty Images

Lawrence Conyers, an anthropology professor at the University of Denver and the author of Ground-Penetrating Radar for Archaeology, said: “National Geographic came in and collected two sets of data and they used the used all the newest equipment with the right antenna. They first did a scan of a wall where they knew there was a void space behind it and used that as a model, so they knew what they were looking for. They did multiple scans of every single wall, and from what I understand, there is absolutely no indication of a void space.”

A scientist familiar with the controversy said: “My understanding is that the Egyptians are in a state of denial about this. They are freaking out, and it has become politically toxic. When you’re the in the middle of a situation in which people are being purged because of their position on this, then scientists should back off and let the politics take its course. We have left the realm of science.”

The initial optimism about finding hidden chambers in the tomb was fuelled by a radar scan performed by a veteran Japanese specialist, Hirokatsu Watanabe. Those findings are under scrutiny, particularly as Watanabe has refused to share the raw data upon which he based his conclusions.

He told the National Geographic website at a conference in Cairo that after more than 40 years in the field, he has customised his equipment to such a degree that its data is unreadable to others. “When someone says that they want to check the data, I am so sad,” he said. But he expressed no doubts about his results: “I trust my data completely.”