



So ... the innocuous looking HB 875 brings these two Monsanto-connected agencies together, and with immensely more power. In recognizing the large international corporate moves being made to take over food , one can appreciate where this and the other bills fit in.

Hillary Clinton ran on a platform to create this centralized "food safety-actually-the-opposite" department (just as Bill Clinton wanted an "organic" label that would absurdly include genetically engineered and irradiated food and sewage sludge as fertilizer). Both promoted a great twisting of reality - dangers with a positive label slapped on top. Her long-time advisor (and perhaps his) has been Mark Penn, head of Burson-Masteller, one of the largest and most reviled PR firms in the world which represents Monsanto, Blackwater, ExxonMobil (they helped cover up the spill), Union Carbide after Bhopal (minimizing the disaster there), the Argentinian junta, and more.

We all know what PR firms do. They stage things, they time things just right for the introduction of something, they create atmosphere they want, they dress things up to look good for the camera which are in fact rotten or dangerous. And they can make people and things which are good, look bad. In short, they manipulate public opinion by manipulating the truth. And when they work for one of the most evil corporations on earth, Monsanto, the degree to which they can pull that off is the degree to which we are all subjected to extreme dangers.

HB 875 is called a "food safety" bill and it looks "nice." But it includes coded words that make other very not nice things become suddenly operative, things that are not mentioned directly in the bill but are buried in multiple other places, as simple lists or as regulations which have never been debated by law makers or voted on by the public, but simply inserted into the agencies, frequently by industries which are supposed to be regulated by those very industries.

absolute government controls over such things as what the farmers must feed their animals (one assumes it will be GMO feed from Monsanto Bt-corn and Bt-soy) and when, what medical regimen they must follow (one assumes it will be the drugs Big PHARM and Big PHARMA sell), what kind of spray (one assumes it will be the pesticides Monsanto sells) and when and where farmers must apply it. The coded words around "tracing" trigger NAIS [please watch this video by the Organic Consumers Association, which is not fooled] and any words around "best farming practices" would unleash a slew ofgovernment controls over such things as what the farmers must feed their animals (one assumes it will be GMO feed from Monsanto Bt-corn and Bt-soy) and when, what medical regimen they must follow (one assumes it will be the drugs Big PHARM and Big PHARMA sell), what kind of spray (one assumes it will be the pesticides Monsanto sells) and when and where farmers must apply it.

It is clear from those three items alone (what the animals eat, what drugs they are subject to, what is done to the soil and plants) that "best farming practices" (and much, much more anti-farming practices are included under that) would impose a complete industrialization of farming and would destroy any farm that was organic.

But it is worse even than that because we are looking at the actual industrial enslavement of our once free farmers by government, forced into a system in which they would become literally "captives" to purchasing mandated products from the very industry that has taken over our tax-payer-funded agencies and is imposing this farm-and-health-destructive regime. They would be paying taxes to be destroyed by the centralized USDA/FDA "food safety" department while those farmers are the only ones producing safe food.

Monsanto influences both agencies. It gets power. It gets data banks to oversee all farmers and even to take DNA from their animals. It gets mandated purchase of its products. It gets to kill organic farming and food.

And as you will see below, it gets even more.

"Best farming practices" include not having animals and crops on the same farm. Does it get more bureaucratically distant from farming or more insane than that?

As massively tricky and corrupt as it seemed Bill Clinton's proposal to label Monsanto's genetically engineered crops and animals "organic," this centralized "food safety" department proposed by Hillary Clinton leaves such single layered, too-transparent wrong-doing in the dust. For now it is not a fake label blatantly proposed, but an entire fake (as to providing "food safety") agency being called for and "in response to" deaths and with all the threats hidden in multiple places.

So while Bill Clinton's proposal would have only hidden everything we eat under a lying label, trapping us into dangers through enforced ignorance, these bills hide the hand of and the greatly multiplied power of Monsanto, hide the death of all independent (non-corporate) and organic farming, and hide the literal take over the entire US food supply.

Hard to get more clever than that.



Given both Bill and Hillary Clinton's long standing connections to Monsanto, and given how much Monsanto already influences both agencies to its own advantage, one assumes this proposal came at the behest of Monsanto.

The examples of both the USDA and FDA favoring industry to the literal destruction of safer small farmers or small businesses, are endless. The USDA wiped out black farmers through massive discrimination against them, the FDA has attacked and eliminated natural health practitioners. The USDA and FDA have worked to eliminate all non-corporate, less expensive, more healthy, green, and localto industrial food and industrial drugs under the aegis of food or drug safety, while passing and protecting and promoting dangerous corporate products such as rBGH and Vioxx.