Instead of Mueller’s investigation proving that Trump colluded with Russia, it is showing that Clinton did.

On Friday evening, Rep. Darrell Issa spoke to Fox News’ Sean Hannity and explained how Clinton is knee deep in Russian collusion.

“Congressman Issa, you were in there. Hopefully, we’ll get the transcript tomorrow. I just went over the problems with these FISA applications. Is it true that the bulk of the information came from the dossier that Christopher Steele doesn’t even stand by?” Hannity asked.

“That’s exactly right,” Rep. Issa said.









“Not only came from the dossier but as you know, Christopher Steele hasn’t been in Russia in 20 years.,” he said.







“So even the people, the unknown people responsible for it could easily, easily have in fact been agents of the Russian government, which would mean that Hillary Clinton is the one guilty of the so-called ‘collusion,’” he said.

Hannity then spoke to strategist and commentator Mark Penn about the investigation.

“Well, that’s a great irony there,” Hannity said.

“You have been very critical, Mark Penn, of this process, from the get-go here, as you should be,” he said.

I believe we have a dual justice system. I’m looking at taxis, loan applications, tax violations, I’m not seeing any collusion here at all,” Hannity continued.

“But I do see issues with Russia with uranium one and that is that we had a spy within that network. And we did have a lot of money kickback in the end. I do see issues with this dossier, it’s full of Russian lies and the FBI used it as the basis of the FISA applications and in fact, they never verified it. What James Comey just said is false. We know they didn’t verify it,” he said.

Penn agreed.

“Well I typically urge all Americans to read the dossier,” Penn said.

“Because anyone who actually reads the dossier, understands it’s a joke document. It’s a document filled with nonsense, what couldn’t possibly be true that almost reads like an April fools joke,” he said.

“Now that we’ve spent, I don’t know, $30 million, you know, investigated almost everyone in the campaign and the administration, there is still no evidence of anything that one would call collusion, and certainly not related to the individual case,” Penn continued.

“If anything we’re drifting more and more back to Monica Lewinski days by talking about payments to Stormy Daniels and trying to take payments that are clearly not campaign-related,” he said.