Oh good lord, another skin betting dipshit teaching people CS through irrelevant numerics. We're not talking about a grand statistic of what happens when you win both pistol rounds, over x amount of maps over x amount of teams. Were talking about a specific singular match, where you're skewed statistic is nothing more than that. A number inflated to support you're obviously biased opinion that na'vi played with an advantage due to winning 5/6 pistol rounds. Winning pistol = advantage, winning eco on 2nd round especially vs CT's is an even bigger advantage. Great were back to square one where any LEM knows as much. If NaVi won 5 pistols, and then proceeded to secure the economic advantage by forcing save rounds on each occasion I would have no choice but to agree with you. However, given that they lost the second round force on multiple occasions in this match, which put them into an even worse financial situation than they would have been had they lost those pistol rounds. I do not agree with you, since you're dead wrong. At the end of the day arguing easy rounds is semantics, all you really need is eyes and a brain, and to actually see and process what happened during the match. Faze would have decimated navi on overpass regardless of pistol rounds, and navi would have dominated faze on inferno regardless of pistol rounds too. All it came down to was Mirage, when as far as I remember both teams played an even amount of economical rounds to gun rounds. If you told me tyloo would win 6/6 pistol rounds vs FAZE, id still bet that FAZE would go 3/3 on maps and so would you. Like I said stop spewing redundant statistics, and better yet just shove em up your ass instead next time you feel like sharing.

2018-02-20 02:35