Markey Says He's Watching AT&T Caps Carefully Though Like Most Politicians, Seems To Miss The Larger Point On Sunday we broke the story that AT&T would be imposing 150-250GB usage caps with $10/50GB overages on all DSL and U-Verse customers. Our forums have since been filled with a number of users who say they'll be leaving AT&T because of the move -- assuming they have the option of more than one carrier in their markets and can vote with their wallets. Not too surprisingly consumer advocates don't like AT&T's vision of the future, and worry that AT&T has set the cap high initially simply to gain customer approval for the concept, with lower caps and higher overages to come. Politicians however had been quiet on AT&T's decision until today, when Rep. Edward Markey (D-Mass.) chimed in on the story. According to Markey comments to The Hill, the new caps could do damage to broadband adoption levels and hurt U.S. competitiveness, both things our new national broadband plan was supposed to help: quote: "I am concerned that charging more for increased usage would raise prices for some consumers and potentially lead to lower broadband adoption levels," he said. "This would undermine our broadband goals as outlined in the National Broadband Plan while undercutting our global competitiveness, and I will be closely monitoring this decision." Except as we've noted an annoying number of times, our national broadband plan Except as we've noted an annoying number of times, our national broadband plan doesn't address competition , and a significant majority of the plan is little more than a series of nice-sounding and politically-safe but ultimately empty policies. The FCC avoided addressing competitive issues in order to avoid upsetting AT&T, and it's not some wild coincidence that AT&T is now implementing incredibly unpopular pricing policies that couldn't be implemented in a truly competitive market. Our global ego and broadband adoption isn't really the core issue. Regulatory capture and competition is. Markey could be asking more pointed questions, such as: can AT&T show any raw, real data proving that congestion on the AT&T network makes these new overage fees necessary? Given we've shown repeated instances of carriers who implement metered billing being unable to offer accurate usage meters, a politician actually concerned about consumers might also like to ask: who is going to bother to make sure AT&T's meters are accurate? Folks who've been around here for a while know the answer to both of these questions ("no" and "nobody," respectively). Still, it might be a good idea if the press, content companies, napping startups in Silicon Valley and politicians started asking harder questions on this subject if they're truly concerned about how punitive per byte pricing impacts consumer prices and U.S. innovation. Folks who've been around here for a while know the answer to both of these questions ("no" and "nobody," respectively). Still, it might be a good idea if the press, content companies, napping startups in Silicon Valley and politicians started asking harder questions on this subject if they're truly concerned about how punitive per byte pricing impacts consumer prices and U.S. innovation.







News Jump SpaceX Providing Internet To Towns Hit by Wildfires; Verizon Launches New 5G Home Hardware In Twin Cities; + more news Stark New Reality In The Telco Business: Dumb Pipes No Longer Cut It; AT&T Unveils Mix and Match Plans; + more news AT&T Extends Overage Charge Waiver; Verizon And T-Mobile Each Insist Their 5G Strategy Is The Right One; + more news War Of Words Heats Up: T-Mobile Fires Back At Verizon, AT&T; Amazon Intros Gaming Service To Take On Stadia; + more news Starlink's Network Faces Huge Limitations; AT&T Whines T-Mobile Merger Put Too Much Spectrum In One Place; + more news WISPs Get CBRS Range As Great As Six Miles At 100 Mbps Speeds; Windstream Officially Exits Bankruptcy; + more news Charter Relaunches Free 60-day Internet And Wi-Fi Offer; NCTA: FCC Should Stick With 25/3 Speed Threshold; + more news Comcast Shuts Off Internet for Subs Who Were Sold Service Illegally; AT&T, Verizon Team To Stop T-Mobile 5G; + more news California Defends Its Net Neutrality Law; AT&T's Traffic Up 20% Despite Data Traffic Actually Being Down; + more news Are The Comcast-Charter X1 Talks Dead In The Water?; AT&T May Offer Phone Plans With Ads For Discounts; + more news ---------------------- this week last week most discussed

Most recommended from 186 comments

jcremin

join:2009-12-22

Siren, WI 2 recommendations jcremin Member The sky is falling I fail to see how this will kill the internet. Hasn't Comcast had a 250GB cap for quite some time now? And once we got past the initial horror stories about how everyone was going to cancel because nobody could live with only 250GB, I haven't really heard anything about it.



The reality is that very few of the people who are saying they will cancel will actually do so. Stories like these get people all worked up, a few months go by and they realize they are only using 20 GB, and they get over it and go on with their normal lives.



This too will be old news in a few months and nobody will care anymore.