Djokovic is not concerned by Shapovalov’s preparations (Picture: AFP/Getty Images)

Novak Djokovic is not concerned by Denis Shapovalov’s plans to study Rafael Nadal in order to beat him and suggested that the pair had little in common in terms of game style.

The Serb will take on the 19-year-old Canadian on Saturday in an enticing third-round encounter at the Australian Open – a match-up Shapovalov described as a ‘dream’.

However, the world No. 27 is adamant he won’t head onto court to make up the numbers and he would study Djokovic’s game thoroughly in order to develop the ideal game plan to beat him.

Shapovalov is hoping to spring a shock (Picture: Getty Images)

As part of his preparation, Shapovalov intends to watch fellow left-hander Nadal’s matches against the world No. 1 in order to gain a tactical advantage.




And while Djokovic is impressed with the youngster’s professionalism and is expecting a good match, he’s unfazed by the prospect of him picking up tips from his great rival in order to beat him.

He smiled: ‘Everyone has access to YouTube. Doesn’t worry me at all.

‘Actually I’m glad to hear that, that he’s doing his homework and research. It’s important for a young player. He’s impressive not just as a talented tennis player but also how he goes about his professionalism, his commitments, how he deals with pressure, how confident he is on the court.

What could Shapovalov learn from Nadal? (Picture: AFP/Getty Images)

‘Quite impressive. I’ve been following him the last couple years because he’s one of the Next Gen stars, promising young players.

‘Yeah, he’s very pumped. He brings a lot of energy to the court, which is great to see. I expect a really interesting encounter. He will not have anything really to lose, so I’m sure he’s going to come out really pumped.

‘On the other hand, in terms of his preparation, I guess he knows what he’s doing. Nadal and him, yes, I mean, the only thing they’re sharing I think is the left hand. I don’t think they share many similarities in their game. I think it’s quite different.’