There is so much happening, and so quickly, on the national political scene that, to quote former Philadelphia Mayor Wilson Goode, “It boggles the entire mind.” If you have read my periodic columns in The Hill, you know I was an opponent of impeaching President Trump Donald John TrumpFederal prosecutor speaks out, says Barr 'has brought shame' on Justice Dept. Former Pence aide: White House staffers discussed Trump refusing to leave office Progressive group buys domain name of Trump's No. 1 Supreme Court pick MORE because I believed the Mueller report did not lay out a persuasive rationale and because, as a pragmatist, I knew that even if the House impeached the president we would never get enough Republican votes to convict in the Senate — so I felt the only thing that would be accomplished in the process would be to fire up the president’s base and make him even harder for Democrats to defeat in the 2020 election.

However, the events concerning the president’s contact with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky have changed my mind. Although I still don't believe enough Republican senators will have the guts to do the right thing and protect the security of our country, I believe the president’s conduct in asking for “a favor” — that is, for Ukraine to investigate former vice president Joe Biden Joe BidenFormer Pence aide: White House staffers discussed Trump refusing to leave office Progressive group buys domain name of Trump's No. 1 Supreme Court pick Bloomberg rolls out M ad buy to boost Biden in Florida MORE and his son’s conduct in Ukraine — was such an egregious abuse of power that, even if there is a political downside to impeachment, the U.S. Constitution obligates Congress to move forward with it.

One thing should be clear: When President Trump asked the Ukrainian leader to investigate Biden and his son, he violated a federal law that says it is a crime for a foreign nation to do anything to help a federal candidate; the president would be guilty of solicitation to commit such a crime. What people should understand is that criminal offense does not require a quid pro quo. Notwithstanding it not being required, the president’s words — “I would like you to do me a favor, though” — and the subsequent email exchange between former Special Representative to Ukraine Kurt Volker Kurt VolkerGOP senators request details on Hunter Biden's travel for probe Yovanovitch retires from State Department: reports Live coverage: Senators enter second day of questions in impeachment trial MORE, Ambassador to Europe Gordon Sondland and Acting Ambassador to Ukraine Bill Taylor make it obvious that there was to be a definite quid pro quo.

ADVERTISEMENT

Although political realities would dictate that this process be completed as quickly as possible, things are unfolding so fast that some degree of patience should be applied to see how many impeachable offenses may be outlined in the charges.

A few days after the November 2018 election, I wrote in a column for The Hill that said it was OK for House Democrats to investigate some of the abuses of this president, but that it was equally important for the House to continue to legislate and not just investigate. Under the leadership of Speaker Nancy Pelosi Nancy PelosiDemocratic senator to party: 'A little message discipline wouldn't kill us' Overnight Health Care: New wave of COVID-19 cases builds in US | Florida to lift all coronavirus restrictions on restaurants, bars | Trump stirs questions with 0 drug coupon plan Overnight Defense: Appeals court revives House lawsuit against military funding for border wall | Dems push for limits on transferring military gear to police | Lawmakers ask for IG probe into Pentagon's use of COVID-19 funds MORE (D-Calif.), Democrats have done a fairly good job of this, passing bills that would:

We continue to legislate while we investigate and, in the next few months, pass bills putting some real teeth in gun control, setting forth a national infrastructure revitalization plan and legalizing the Dreamers, to name just a few. But in the face of President Trump’s campaign ad onslaught, it is important for House Democrats or the Democratic National Committee (DNC) to spend money now to let the public know the important legislation that they have passed and sent to the Senate — which Majority Leader Mitch McConnell Addison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellDemocratic senator to party: 'A little message discipline wouldn't kill us' House to vote on resolution affirming peaceful transition of power Republican lawyers brush off Trump's election comments MORE (R-Ky.) and President Trump have vowed to not even bring to a vote.

It’s doubtful that one in 10 Americans could name one bill the Democratic-controlled House has passed and sent to the Senate. If we are to make the country understand that we have been legislating as well as investigating, we need to spend money now — before we get into the heavy political months that lie ahead. This is vitally important because, although the view in Washington may be that impeachment is the only thing on the voters’ minds, it isn’t. Most voters have an opinion about impeachment, but they are more concerned about issues that involve them personally.

Democrats vowed that we would “legislate and not just investigate.” We have made good on that promise and now we have to tell the American people what we have done. If we do so convincingly, 2020 could indeed be a very good year.

Edward G. Rendell was the 45th governor of Pennsylvania. He is a former mayor of Philadelphia and former district attorney in that city. He served as chairman of the Democratic National Committee during the 2000 presidential election. He is now co-chairman of the Immigration Task Force at the Bipartisan Policy Center. Follow him on Twitter @GovEdRendell.