Download raw source

Delivered-To: john.podesta@gmail.com Received: by 10.100.139.5 with SMTP id m5cs283083and; Sat, 9 Aug 2008 13:14:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.193.16 with SMTP id q16mr2347215rvf.173.1218312869239; Sat, 09 Aug 2008 13:14:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.248.19 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Aug 2008 13:14:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <ab48a30f0808091314n368a759bo92279ef7383bd6db@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 13:14:29 -0700 From: "Christopher Edley" <cedley@gmail.com> To: john.podesta@gmail.com Subject: Three matters MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_46545_19688120.1218312869220" ------=_Part_46545_19688120.1218312869220 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Dear John: 1. Preeta Bansal wrote and called me. Recall that she is the chief of appellate litigation at Skadden, put together the Asian American Finance Committee (which is raising over $5m), and been active on campaign policy groups. You called her last week about participating, but when Mike Froman called her to follow up after Friday's Board conference call, Preeta got a very different description of her proposed role than what she had understood from your tactically vague description. Bottom line is that in light of her previous campaign activities and conversations with Betsy Myers and Tom Daschle, Preeta had thought she would be invited to play a considerably more significant role, if not made a member of the Board. (I note that the Board has no Asian-Americans.) I know independently that there is frustration among Asian-American supporters that they have not had a voice in the campaign, despite the fundraising, loyalty in politically tough times ("Democrat from Punjab") and hard work. Post-primary, Asians have been added from the DNC and HRC camp, while dissing the Obama loyalists -- or so people have told me. I'd be happy to have Preeta co-chair the Immigration working group, but that's probably not enough. My sense from the conversation with Preeta is that she may talk to Daschle or even try to reach Barack. She's not a kid, John. She's a senior, very accomplished Wall Street litigator. (And another former student of mine.) On a mission. 2. On the outcome of the ethics discussion, I said more than I cared to but much less than I could have. I was disappointed that folks claiming to be politically shrewd think the formal "lobbyist" distinction in law will suffice for political cover. If a half-smart journalist thinks about it for five minutes -- admittedly not a certain thing -- they will realize that the real issue is "special interests", not the definitions in the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. sec. 1602. 3. I am nervous about the Health Care group. These are your people, not mine, and the dancing around on membership has left me feeling not just impotent but also worried about whether the relationships and agendas in all of this will ultimately work for an Obama agenda -- defined in terms of the substance and strategy. (Childress?) The President of RWJ Foundation, for example, told me that Daschle (with Mitchell, Dole, Baker) are supposed to be promoting and fashioning a bipartisan approach to universal care legislation. Ain't obvious that those conversations are the right vehicle for developing an Obama plan's details. (Although it's possible, especially if Obama doesn't care to sweat the details.) But in that Leader quartet, I don't see any unalloyed progressives, and I had hoped that would be a dimension of Obama policymaking. Barack isn't our friend "Let's Make a Deal" Bill Clinton, and he may welcome opportunities to consider tough stands in favor of poor people or colored people or undocumented immigrants, or scoring rules more encouraging of investments in long term efficiencies. I don't see the Quartet producing those. And, as I say, I don't find encouragement in what I know of the profiles of the folks Jeanne, with your encouragement, wants on the committee. Can we please talk about this? I've been trying to bend over backwards to be deferential to you on this stuff and support your leadership. *This might not be the perfect moment to remind you that I'm still hoping for a favorable response on our invitation to speak at Berkeley on 9/19 !! * Saturday, 8/09/08 at 1:15 pm PST (personal email) Christopher Edley, Jr. Professor and Dean UC Berkeley Law School ------=_Part_46545_19688120.1218312869220 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline <div dir=3D"ltr">Dear John:<br><br>1. Preeta Bansal wrote and called = me. Recall that she is the chief of appellate litigation at Skadden, = put together the Asian American Finance Committee (which is raising over $5= m), and been active on campaign policy groups. You called her last we= ek about participating, but when Mike Froman called her to follow up after = Friday's Board conference call, Preeta got a very different description= of her proposed role than what she had understood from your tactically vag= ue description. Bottom line is that in light of her previous campaign= activities and conversations with Betsy Myers and Tom Daschle, Preeta had = thought she would be invited to play a considerably more significant role, = if not made a member of the Board. (I note that the Board has no Asia= n-Americans.) I know independently that there is frustration among As= ian-American supporters that they have not had a voice in the campaign, des= pite the fundraising, loyalty in politically tough times ("Democrat fr= om Punjab") and hard work. Post-primary, Asians have been added = from the DNC and HRC camp, while dissing the Obama loyalists -- or so peopl= e have told me.<br> <br> I'd be happy to have Preeta co-chair the Immigration w= orking group, but that's probably not enough. My sense from the c= onversation with Preeta is that she may talk to Daschle or even try to reac= h Barack. She's not a kid, John. She's a senior, very accompl= ished Wall Street litigator. (And another former student of mine.) On= a mission.<br> <br>2. On the outcome of the ethics discussion, I said more than I ca= red to but much less than I could have. I was disappointed that folks claim= ing to be politically shrewd think the formal "lobbyist" distinct= ion in law will suffice for political cover. If a half-smart journali= st thinks about it for five minutes -- admittedly not a certain thing -- th= ey will realize that the real issue is "special interests", not t= he definitions in the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. sec. = 1602.<br> <br>3. I am nervous about the Health Care group. These are your= people, not mine, and the dancing around on membership has left me feeling= not just impotent but also worried about whether the relationships and age= ndas in all of this will ultimately work for an Obama agenda -- defined in = terms of the substance and strategy. (Childress?) The President of RW= J Foundation, for example, told me that Daschle (with Mitchell, Dole, Baker= ) are supposed to be promoting and fashioning a bipartisan approach to univ= ersal care legislation. Ain't obvious that those conversations ar= e the right vehicle for developing an Obama plan's details. (Although i= t's possible, especially if Obama doesn't care to sweat the details= .) But in that Leader quartet, I don't see any unalloyed progress= ives, and I had hoped that would be a dimension of Obama policymaking. = ; Barack isn't our friend "Let's Make a Deal" Bill Clinto= n, and he may welcome opportunities to consider tough stands in favor of po= or people or colored people or undocumented immigrants, or scoring rules mo= re encouraging of investments in long term efficiencies. I don't = see the Quartet producing those. And, as I say, I don't find encouragem= ent in what I know of the profiles of the folks Jeanne, with your encourage= ment, wants on the committee. Can we please talk about this? I've= been trying to bend over backwards to be deferential to you on this stuff = and support your leadership. <br> <br><b><span style=3D"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 0);">This might not b= e the perfect moment to remind you that I'm still hoping for a favorabl= e response on our invitation to speak at Berkeley on 9/19 !!</span><br styl= e=3D"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 0);"> </b><br>Saturday, 8/09/08 at 1:15 pm PST<br><br><br>(personal email)<= br>Christopher Edley, Jr.<br>Professor and Dean<br>UC Berkeley Law School<b= r> </div> ------=_Part_46545_19688120.1218312869220--