Internal Environmental Protection Agency documents don’t support the EPA's contention that Administrator Scott Pruitt Edward (Scott) Scott PruittJuan Williams: Swamp creature at the White House Science protections must be enforceable Conspicuous by their absence from the Republican Convention MORE needs round-the-clock security and first-class flights, two leading Democratic senators say.

Sens. Tom Carper Thomas (Tom) Richard CarperDemocrat asks for probe of EPA's use of politically appointed lawyers Overnight Energy: Study links coronavirus mortality to air pollution exposure | Low-income, minority households pay more for utilities: report OVERNIGHT ENERGY: Democrats push resolution to battle climate change, sluggish economy and racial injustice | Senators reach compromise on greenhouse gas amendment stalling energy bill | Trump courts Florida voters with offshore drilling moratorium MORE (D-Del.) and Sheldon Whitehouse Sheldon WhitehouseHillicon Valley: Murky TikTok deal raises questions about China's role | Twitter investigating automated image previews over apparent algorithmic bias | House approves bill making hacking federal voting systems a crime House approves legislation making hacking voting systems a federal crime LWCF modernization: Restoring the promise MORE (D-R.I.) said on Tuesday that various records question the EPA’s contentions that Pruitt has faced an “unprecedented” number of death threats and that the agency “has identified specific, ongoing threats associated with the administrator’s air travel.”

“These assertions do not appear to be consistent with the non-public EPA documents we have obtained,” the two senators wrote in a letter to Senate Environment and Public Works Committee Chairman John Barrasso John Anthony BarrassoMurkowski: Supreme Court nominee should not be taken up before election Battle lines drawn on precedent in Supreme Court fight Sunday shows - Ruth Bader Ginsburg's death dominates MORE (R-Wyo.).

ADVERTISEMENT

Carper, the top Democrat on the panel, and Whitehouse, a senior member, are asking Barrasso to convene oversight hearings into Pruitt’s security practices.

Carper and Whitehouse said the agency's Office of Homeland Security Intelligence Team found that Pruitt’s security detail “has not identified any specific credible direct threat to the EPA administrator.”

EPA had also requested a pair of Secret Service reports, neither of which found “reports of behaviors of interest directed toward EPA Administrator Pruitt,” the lawmakers added.

“It is hard to reconcile the public statements of EPA, and the President, with these internal and external assessments,” the Democrats wrote.

“It may be that the materials we have been provided are incomplete and that EPA has additional information that justifies its public position. However, another view is that certain factions within EPA have justified the exorbitant taxpayer spending incurred by the administrator’s first-class travel and large entourage of security personnel through unsubstantiated claims about threats to his security, either at the direction of the administrator himself or others in the agency.”

Pruitt has been under fire for months for how he spends taxpayer money. A 24-7 protection detail with 19 agents — which The Associated Press said has cost $3 million — is a focus, as is first-class travel in the name of security.

President Trump Donald John TrumpBubba Wallace to be driver of Michael Jordan, Denny Hamlin NASCAR team Graham: GOP will confirm Trump's Supreme Court nominee before the election Southwest Airlines, unions call for six-month extension of government aid MORE indicated this past weekend that Pruitt’s security spending is acceptable to him.

“While Security spending was somewhat more than his predecessor, Scott Pruitt has received death threats because of his bold actions at EPA,” he tweeted.

EPA spokesman Jahan Wilcox also defended Pruitt’s practices.

“Scott Pruitt has faced an unprecedented amount of death threats against him and these threat assessments are conducted within [Office of Enforcement] using information collected from the [security detail], EPA’s Office of Homeland Security, and Inspector General. Americans should all agree that members of the president’s cabinet should be kept safe from these violent threats,” Wilcox said in a statement.

Carper and Whitehouse said the EPA justified Pruitt’s security spending based in part on an October memo summarizing the supposed threats against him.

That memo described protesters disrupting a speech Pruitt gave, a social media post expressing a desire to speak with Pruitt about the author’s displeasure and a postcard saying, in part, “CLIMATE CHANGE IS REAL!!! We are watching you.”

“Notably, none of the incidents listed in this report concerned air travel and the only threat to Administrator Pruitt currently being prosecuted by a United States Attorney’s office was a threat made to him and his predecessor Gina McCarthy Regina (Gina) McCarthyFormer EPA chiefs endorse Biden, criticize agency direction under Trump OVERNIGHT ENERGY: Energy Department proposes showerhead standards rollback after Trump complaints | Interior memo scaling back bird protections is 'contrary to law,' court rules | Former EPA chiefs call for agency 'reset' Former EPA chiefs call for agency 'reset' MORE,” the senators said.