I will keep this simple. I see no need to defend my previous syllogism as my opponent clearly sees no value in actually debating. Instead, I will once again rebut my opponent's emotionally fueled argument point by point.

Rebuttal

Please, don't go into abstractions.

If you wish to avoid metaphysical discussions, I suggest you avoid topics on God's existence in the future.

I am basing my argument on physical evidence, namely that we can disprove nearly everything god was believed to have done.

What physical evidence? This is just ipse dixit.

We know not how the universe was created, but we will find out in time.

In other words, you have faith in Atheism.

Tell me, if god does exist, why is there so much evil in the world? Why doesn't he set it all right, being omnipotent?

In case this is meant to be the logical Problem of Evil, the refutation is simple. The Problem of Evil asserts there is a logical contradiction given these three premises:

P1. God is all powerful

P2. God is all good

P3. Evil exists

These three premises are in conflict. One of them must logically be removed to make it coherent. However, the refutation is simple: add a fourth premise.

P1. God is all powerful

P2. God is all good

P3. Evil exists

P4. God has a morally sufficient reason for the evil which exists

There is no logical contradiction in the above four premises. All four of these can now be simultaneously true insofar as logic is concerned. Now, my opponent wants to know why, but frankly, asking "why" is not enough to support his position. I've at least shown that it's not a logical problem.

And do you mean to say that our destinies are controlled by god? That whatever we do, we must follow the script that is already in place? It is proved that we have the power of choice, opening up multiple dimensions with each choice we make or don't make. We know that we have the power of deciding, but they d=say god has scripted out outr [sic] lives, so the existence of god is disproved.

There are plenty of atheists that argue against free will, saying that it is illusory. So, what "proof" do you have that free will is a reality other than just stating as such. Once again, ipse dixit.

I will answer your abstractions with abstractions of my own - you say someone had to create the universe, so that can be counted as proof for god's existence, but proof denies faith, and without faith god is nothing, therefore god cannot exist.

Faith is not the absence of reason, but the confidence in one's belief. The more reason you have to believe something, the more faith you have in it. For example, you have faith that your car will start when you turn the key, and you have good reason for that faith. However, you can't know with 100% certainty that the car will start. Maybe the battery is dead one morning.

Conversely, you can have complete faith that a particular brick wall doesn't exist, but that faith matters little to the reality that when you attempt to ride your bike through it, you will come to an abrupt (and possibly painful) stop. God's existence is utterly independent of our faith. He either exists or he doesn't.

Conclusion

I have given a simple syllogism that my opponent has blatantly ignored. I ask the voters to set aside their current convictions and give the vote to the better debater.