OKC - WHAT REALLY DESTROYED THE BUILDING?

PART 1

By: Devvy January 11, 2004 NewsWithViews.com "We will leave no stone unturned in our effort to get to the truth." ï¿½ Attorney General Janet Reno Recently two new articles on the OKC bombing have been published: January 28, 2004, McCurtain Daily Gazette Langan to testify at Nichols trial, name others in OKC bombing "A convicted neo-Nazi bank robber is expected to name several other suspects in the Oklahoma City bombing when he testifies in the trial of Terry Nicholsï¿½.." The article gives general background and then states: "Briefly explaining the scope of his expected testimony, Langan indicated that he will provide evidence to the jury that will tie McVeigh and the bomb plot to several men with very close connections to the white supremacist enclave called Elohim City." I find it rather suspect that after all these years, just at the time when Nichols is scheduled to be tried again at the state level, a convicted waste of human skin suddenly wants to name suspects with conveniently white supremacist ties. In a recent phone discussion with Brigadier General Ben Partin, U.S.A.F. (Retired), this association with the Elohim City connection is "a manufactured image to justify all this anti-terrorism legislation. Blame everything on the 'right-wing Christian threat' and lump them in with white supremacists. One only has to look at the FBI's "Project Mediggo" to see the blueprint for this scenario." (Megiddo means "mountain" in Hebrew, and har Megiddo, "the mountain," eluded to become Armageddon. According to geography books, Megiddo lies south of Nazareth, where Jesus lived as a child. According to the New Testament, Armageddon is where Jesus will triumph over evil after an apocalyptic battle on Judgment Day. Rather interesting that the Federal government decided to use Mediggo as the title for their home grown terrorist report.) Unfortunately, there are neo-Nazi organizations operating in this country, one being too many. But, to carte blanche paint every American who holds Christian beliefs as some sort of domestic terrorist is heinous and goes against everything this nation was founded upon. Then again, the end game for those who seek destroy what we hold so dear is literally a clash of civilizations: Christianity vs. Communism. The clash is here and now like never before in this history of this Republic. In my opinion, the only question about the OKC bombing that should be asked is what really caused the multiple explosions that destroyed the Murrah Building? In a nutshell, the case of the FBI investigation into this horrific crime was beyond incompetence, it is an ongoing cover up. The FBI manipulated any real evidence and tore at the heart strings of Americans to build their case. The second article cited below does raise the question and rightly so about where are the video tapes known to exist of those critical moments the morning of April 19, 1995? February 1, 2004 - Worldnetdaily.com Ex-Congressmanï¿½s aide has video of explosion? "The Fairfax County, Va., home of John Culbertson ï¿½ once a member of former U.S. Rep. James Traficant's scandal-plagued congressional office ï¿½ was raided Friday afternoon by Oklahoma City police detectives searching for evidence related to the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing." According to this article, Culbertson may have in his possession a number of crucial videos and still photos never known to federal or state prosecutors until recently. If true, it is inconceivable that this Culbertson would conceal, at his private residence no less, important evidence ï¿½ no matter who it may or may not implicate. Further into the article it states: "In an affidavit obtained by this newspaper, Detective Easley said Mills told him the images he was shown included the Murrah building in ''pristine condition.'' "Mills then said, ''Mr. Culbertson pushed a button and a second photograph came up with a small glow at the bottom of the building. Mr. Culbertson pushed another button and another frame appeared of a ball of fire rising from the building and the building fell." Other videos still out there? Martin Keating (brother of Frank Keating, former company man for the FBI and Governor of Oklahoma at the time of the bombing), bragged after the bombing that he had copies of the surveillance film from the Southwest Bell building across the street from the Murrah building. Another odd thing about Martin Keating that just can't be ignored: Brother Martin wrote a manuscript in 1991, roughly four years before the OKC bombing. Keating could not get this work published until after the bombing. This manuscript, now a published book, is titled The Final Jihad. In this book, Keating lays out a story of terrorists based in OKC who decide to bomb a federal building. Guess what the name of the one of the key "terrorists" in the book is? Tom McVey. And for the kicker of this fictional work: The terrorists in The Final Jihad are stopped by an Oklahoma highway patrolman for a broken tail light. How extraordinary! We have a book in manuscript form written four years before the OKC bombing whose story line involves terrorists in Oklahoma City. This part of this fictional work comes true. We have a main character in the book by the name of Tom McVey. In real life, the bomber four years later in OKC is named Tim McVeigh. We have the terrorists in this fictional work stopped by Oklahoma state troopers for a broken tail light. In real life, our bomber, Tim McVeigh, is pulled over by an Oklahoma state trooper because of a missing license plate. How's that for fiction being stranger than reality? In this book, written in 1991, Martin Keating also predicts the TWA downing and the World Trade Center bombing. Was this just a premonition that Mr. Keating had? The bottom line is why hasn't Martin Keating been put under the microscope regarding his own statements that he has videos that could unlock the truth? That aside, now we are starting to touch on the real issue in the OKC bombing: What really destroyed the building? It is the key to the crime and this two part series, I hope, will encourage the American people demand a real investigation by experts, who have no ties whatsoever to the Federal government, into all the facts and evidence about OKC. McVeighï¿½s Second Trial Millions and millions of words have been written about Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols. Most of it focuses on the "anti-government" hate mongers, Tim McVeigh, Nichols and the Ryder truck filled with drums of ammonia nitrate, which once cooked and detonated, turned into "weapons of mass destruction" that brought down the Murrah Building ï¿½ or it is alleged. Several weeks before McVeigh's execution, this writer authored a 228-page document titled McVeigh's Second Trial . This meticulous statement of facts was not compiled to defend Timothy McVeigh, although every defendant is presumed to be innocent until proven guilty. That was impossible in the United States v. Timothy McVeigh trial. The greatest majority of the American people have never been told the truth about the facts surrounding that heinous act. Both the Clinton and Bush administrations, through their minions, Janet Reno and John Ashcroft, have gone to extraordinary lengths to conceal the truth and have participated in a colossal cover up pertaining to the slaughter of 168 innocent men, women, children and babies. I am compelled to cite some of the factual details contained in McVeigh's Second Trial because it is one of my life goals to see those who perpetrated this screaming act of murder suffer the full consequences of the law at the state level; the feds have no jurisdiction to try McVeigh or Nichols for murder; see the U.S. Constitution. These are just a tiny fraction of issues covered in McVeigh's Second Trial : Question: With no suspects and absolutely no leads, how is it the feds zeroed in on McVeigh within 48 hours? Fact: Because, quite conveniently, his social security number was put out to all law enforcement as a suspect within two days of the bombing . This is how patsy's are made. Question: Was Trooper Charlie Hanger alone when he pulled McVeigh over near Perry, Oklahoma? According to the official trial transcripts, apparently not: Trooper Hanger under cross by the completely incompetent McVeigh defense team: Q: Did you drive even with the driver's side of Mr. McVeigh's vehicle? Response by Trooper Hanger: "I actually overshot him. We passed him." "We" passed him? Was this just a slip by Hanger because he usually rides with a partner or was there another trooper in his official car that day when the real Timothy McVeigh was pulled over? If so, why was he/she never mentioned or put on the stand? On May 20, 1995, just a few days before the evidence (the Murrah Building) was destroyed, I drove the stretch between the crime scene (the Murrah Building) and the location where McVeigh was pulled over. It would have been impossible for him to drive this distance in the time available for the government's time line to work without exceeding a consistent speed of 80+ mph. No one has ever stepped forward to say they observed this 1977 crummy old Mercury Marquis speeding away from OKC at high speed, all the way up the interstate to the Perry turn off. Not to mention how foolish it would have been for McVeigh to draw such attention to himself. McVeigh's car had very distinct rust markings, yet no one remembers seeing this vehicle speeding away from OKC to the Perry exit. How extraordinary. The Carol Howe Case This case was directly connected to the investigation of the loons who lived in Elohim City, McVeigh and the bombing. During Ms. Howe's trial, a single witness destroys the government's time line regarding Timothy McVeigh. As this witness was a victim of the bombing, it isn't likely she would want to do anything to help mass murderer Timothy McVeigh, but she did. Why on earth Stephen Jones never subpoenaed her to testify at McVeigh's trial in Denver remains a mystery to this writer. Testimony from the official transcripts of Germaine Johnston; the full transcript testimony can be read in McVeighï¿½s Second Trial . Certain parts have been omitted for brevity. Please be prepared when you read the transcripts contained in that document because the testimony of victims and their families will rip your heart out. Q. Did you have an encounter with someone that stood out in your mind? Answer by Ms. Johnston: Yes, I did. When I got down here, to the Southwestern Bell property, there was a car sitting facing north, and there were two young men standing by it. And as -- approached them. Q. Do you know about how long after the bombing that would have been? A. My estimate would be that it was 20 or 25 minutes afterwards. I think between 9:25 and 9:35 or something like that. Q. Okay. Now, you said that there were two young men that you saw? A. Uh-huh, there were two men standing by the passenger side of this car. It was yellow car. It was parked in the alley, close to this building right here, facing north; and they were standing by the driver's door. Q. Now, did you recognize the type of car? A. It was a Mercury. Q. How do you know that? A. My husband and I used to drive a Mercury, about that same age and about that same color. Q. What model, year model was your Mercury? A. '77. Q. What color was this Mercury? A. It was faded yellow. Q. Okay. Was it a four-door? A. Yes. Photos of McVeigh's car are at: [www.okcitytrial.com/content/current/April/exb41 2.jpg]

[www.okcitytrial.com/content/current/April/exb41 3.jpg]

[www.okcitytrial.com/content/current/April/exb41 4.jpg] You will notice on the driver's side of the car, there is huge discoloration and rust. There is no mention of this in Mrs. Johnston's testimony above because, unfortunately, she is standing on the passenger side of the car. Did she happen to see the other side of the car before going on her way? The question was never asked, but it should have been by McVeighï¿½s defense attorneys. The other critical statement during Mrs. Johnston's testimony that must be considered is this: She states that she approached this yellow '77 Mercury approximately 20-25 minutes after the bombing. That would make it somewhere between 9:25 and 9:35 am in her words. That is her testimony. These are very, very important minutes. Why? Because Trooper Hanger stated in his testimony that "we" pulled McVeigh over at approximately 10:20 am. According to his log for that day, it says he called in the arrest at 10:22 am. That would mean that McVeigh would have driven from the Murrah Building to the location of his arrest in 50 minutes or less. As I said earlier, unless McVeigh was flying in his clunker, which no one observed, the time line doesn't fit. Come on, with all the horror and publicity surrounding his arrest, not one single person on that highway that day at around that time came forward to report seeing McVeigh's car. A whole lot of people saw the brown pick up with Middle Eastern looking men inside speed away from the building. However, that solid lead was quickly dropped at the altar of political correctness. How revolting. According to the feds in McVeigh's trial, he allegedly left the Ryder truck at 9:00 am, walked quickly away and 1 hr and 20 minutes later, he was pulled over. That can be done if you drove straight as the crow flies, however, it doesnï¿½t square with Ms. Johnston's sworn testimony. Even if McVeigh walked straight to his get-away car, the Murrah Building was not located next to the freeway on-ramp. Precious minutes would be eaten up getting to I-35 north. Trooper Hanger says McVeigh was not speeding when he approached him. Now, let's go back to Mrs. Johnston. She says she spoke with McVeigh and another man at roughly 9:25-9:35 am. She testified that as she approached them, they were just standing there on the driver's side. She briefly spoke with them and then moved on. The question is how long did this McVeigh and the other unidentified man continue to stand there? Did they get in this yellow car and leave? Did the unidentified man leave then and then this McVeigh get in his car and take off? We don't know. One thing I do know: If it was 9:25-9:35 am and McVeigh was standing around near the building, there simply is no way, without traveling at a high speed all the way, that McVeigh could have made it to marker 202-203 where Trooper Hanger stopped him at 10:20 am. Also, what happened to the second man this McVeigh was with when Ms. Johnston spoke with them? It wasn't Nichols. McVeigh would have had to leave the minute Mrs. Johnston walked away, hurry to I- 35, which would have drawn a lot of attention, some one fleeing instead of sticking around to help, and race up I-35 to travel 75 miles in the 45 minutes left to him based on Mrs. Johnston's testimony. Could you drive 75 miles in 45 minutes? This means getting to the freeway through the massive mess and heading out at a very high speed. The time line doesn't work. Mrs. Johnston was a victim. It's unlikely she would want to mislead anyone during her testimony to protect McVeigh. This not only establishes very reasonable doubt, it also puts us once again with two McVeigh look-alikes. In the June 1995 issue of Soldier of Fortune Magazine is a photo of three ATF agents taken in a court room during the Waco trials. Two are identified; the agent in the middle is not. He is also a dead ringer for Timothy James McVeigh. Coming in Part II: 1 Devvy Kidd v Dept. of the Army: Court sitting on motion for summary judgment for almost six months to obtain McVeighï¿½s medical records

2 More government witnesses destroy the feds concocted lies

3 Chaos at the FBI lab that evaluated the physical evidence ï¿½ what evidence?

4 What did Samuel Cohen, inventor of the Neutron bomb convey in a letter to former Oklahoma State Representative Charles Key about the truck bomb?

5 What about all the "as it was happening" official calls about un-detonated bombs being found inside the building? Where are they? ï¿½ 2004 Devvy Kidd - All Rights Reserved Sign Up For Free E-Mail Alerts Please, Help Us Wake Up America



Devvy Kidd authored the booklets, Why A Bankrupt America and Blind Loyalty, which sold close to 2,000,000 copies. Has been a guest more than 1600 times on radio shows, ran for Congress twice and is a highly sought after public speaker. Devvy is a contibuting writer for www.NewsWithViews.com Devvy's web site is: www.devvy.com; e-mail is: devvyk@earthlink.net Home

"The greatest majority of the American people have never been told the truth about the facts surrounding that heinous act."