http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IemQiJ0QNs

Aunt of the accused thinks it's a set-up...

http://www.infowars.com/father-of-boston-suspects-us-security-services-set-up-my-sons/

Father of the accused thinks it's a set-up, is travelling to America to help with their defense...

https://twitter.com/xXjungaXx/

Their friend thinks it was a set-up, points to the twitter of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev where he says he takes pride in being a lifeguard because he can save lives...

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/bomb-suspect-dzhokhar-tsarnaev-throat-injury-self-inflicted-article-1.1323323

Dzhokhar shot in the throat - allegedly by himself.

Question - assuming he is innocent, how will this affect the public's perception of him during a trial?

Answer - it removes the public's ability to sympathize with him. A young man with a clear concience exonerating himself under cross-examination can destroy an entire case - especially considering that there doesn't appear to be a single shred of evidence tying him to the planting of bombs, the instigation of a shoot-out, the throwing of bombs out of a moving automobile, or the robbing of a 7/11.

Somebody please correct me if i'm wrong here, if there is actual evidence that either of these two brothers have done anything at all.

In lieu of such evidence, all I can conclude is that this is one more example of the ruling class/government sacrificing innocent people, blaming them for crimes, and then expecting the public to pay them more money for more oppressive crackdowns on society. In other words, another Timothy McVeigh/Waco (the OLD Waco incident, where the ATF burned all those religious people alive)/Osama Bin Laden staged PR event.

I took a screengrab of the "xXjungaXx" twitter right here - it is certainly persuasive.

Where's the evidence?

So what evidence do we have that seems to prove SOMEBODY ELSE is guilty?

Well, first, here's a detonated backpack:

Black body, black strap with white to gray extra fabric stripe, and white stuff coming out of the interior. Right?

So, here are the surveillance shots of the brothers:

They don't have that backpack.

Who has backpacks resembling that one? Well, the guys who were apparently working the event from "Craft International" - the guys dressed in the khaki pants, black jackets, and combat boots, hiding behind the crowd and talking in earpieces - would be some people's first guess:

But we can plainly see their backpacks have fully black straps - which leaves them as candidates for the other explosion, but not the first.

Who was holding the backpack that exploded?

Maybe this really sketchy looking guy, in the blue jacket and red shirt, who's seen holding the backpack in front of him?

This is basically slam-dunk evidence. As you can see from this photo above, he is not only apparently planting the backpack, but even casing the scene.

The entire society is going on a witch hunt. Vulture politicians are already swooping in to try to turn this into a debate on IMMIGRATION:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/04/21/graham-boston-marathon-bombings-ought-to-prompt-swifter-action-on-immigration-reform/

As if we're going to solve the problem of people violent acting out against society (if they had even done it!) by making society subject to even more crackdowns and misery?

This is pathetic. Our society is driving off of a cliff right now.