The evidence available to the public of crimes by the Clintons — including pedophilia, fraud, and treason — leaves no doubt that Trump should have them investigated. But will he?

Throughout his campaign for the White House, Donald Trump repeatedly asserted that it was his mission, if elected, to “drain the swamp” of corruption in Washington, D.C. And he frequently noted that “Crooked Hillary” is a key figure in that swamp. During his televised debate with Hillary Clinton on October 10, he dramatically upped the rhetorical ante, pointedly telling his opponent: “If I win, I am going to instruct my attorney general to get a special prosecutor to look into your situation. Because there have never been so many lies, so much deception.”

Trump told Clinton she owed America an apology for the “33,000 emails you deleted,” and, further, that if he became president, “You’d be in jail.” The exchange made for spectacular political theater, but was Trump serious? Should Hil­lary Rodham Clinton be in jail — and not merely for jeopardizing national security by transmitting classified material over a private, unsecured e-mail account, in violation of the law while secretary of state? There is ample evidence to persuasively suggest that, yes indeed, she should be occupying a residence in one of our federal institutions of higher detention. On October 30, The Hill reported that former assistant FBI director James Kallstrom stated in an interview: “The Clintons, that’s a crime family, basically. It’s like organized crime. I mean the Clinton Foundation is a cesspool.... God forbid we put someone like that [Clinton] in the White House.” Kallstrom also blasted current FBI Director James Comey and Attorney General Loretta Lynch, both Obama appointees, for impeding the investigation into Clinton’s use of the private server.

“The problem here is this investigation was never a real investigation,” he said. “That’s the problem. They never had a grand jury empaneled, and the reason they never had a grand jury empaneled, I’m sure, is Loretta Lynch would not go along with that.” According to Kallstrom, rank-and-file FBI agents “are furious with what’s going on” to protect Clinton from prosecution.

However, as serious as the Clinton e-mail security breaches are, they are but a minuscule portion of the Clinton crime cesspool. Hacker websites such as WikiLeaks, Guccifer, Guccifer 2.0, and DCLeaks, have released tens of thousands of e-mails to and from Hillary Clinton, her campaign chairman John Podesta, other Clinton staff members, lobbyists, donors, and investors that paint a very incriminating picture.

Hillary’s media pals, however, have discounted the hacked e-mails almost entirely. Probably the most common media theme has been that expressed by Russell Berman, in his piece entitled “What the WikiLeaks Emails Say About Clinton,” for The Atlantic, one of the many establishment presstitute vehicles that has stumped for Clinton. According to Berman, the hacked e-mails “show a political candidate being political. Not much more, and not much less.”

Likewise for Berman’s brethren in the Clinton propaganda choir; they stuffed page after page of reports on WikiLeaks with the most inconsequential and mundane e-mails: petty in-fighting amongst Clinton staffers, scheduling arrangements, arguments over campaign strategy, suggested jokes for Hillary to use in a speech, suggestions that Hillary should smile more, etc. But the media “watchdogs” have displayed a glaring and obstinate lack of curiosity about investigating the most obvious issues that carry the distinct criminal reek of influence peddling, graft, bribery, money laundering, and (yes, we dare say) treason. Hillary Rodham Clinton, her royal consort William Jefferson Clinton, her consiglieri John Podesta, and other members of the Clinton Foundation and Hillary Clinton campaign have been engaged in an enormous shakedown operation for personal enrichment that appears to involve many instances of subverting our electoral process and selling out American national security to foreign adversaries.

We are not dependent solely on WikiLeaks and other hacktivists for evidence. Judicial Watch, the public service watchdog group, has obtained many of the Clinton e-mails and other documents from the State Department through its Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests and lawsuits. Also, undercover video reporters of James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas have caught Hillary Clinton’s operatives red-handed, admitting to using illegal activities — including violence and voter fraud — to advance their radical political agenda. Best-selling author and investigative journalist Dr. Jerome Corsi has uncovered mountains of alleged criminal misconduct, which he has detailed in his columns for WorldNetDaily and in his latest book, Partners in Crime: The Clintons’ Scheme to Monetize the White House for Personal Profit. Likewise, Peter Schweizer, the independent investigator and president of the Government Accountability Institute, has detailed a strong case for indicting Hillary Clinton in his book Clinton Cash — The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich.

We have utilized all of the above sources — and more — to assemble a collection of some of the most notable instances of corruption, abuse, and outright criminal activity by the “Clinton Crime Family” that have been “overlooked” by the Clinton-friendly establishment media.

Uranium One: From Russia With Love (and Money)

Throughout the recent election cycle, Team Clinton tried to make political hay with the charge that Donald Trump is tied up in some type of love tryst (and business deals) with Russia and Vladimir Putin. This is really rich and brazen hypocrisy, since it is Bill and Hillary Clinton and John Podesta who have been wheeling and dealing with Putin & Company. One of the most incredible examples of this is the Uranium One deal, in which Hillary and Bill Clinton and their Clinton Foundation raked in a huge fortune (reportedly $130 million — or more) from American, Canadian, and Russian investors who helped arrange for Russian companies — under the control, ultimately, of Vladimir Putin — to take control of at least 20 percent of our strategic uranium assets.

According to some calculations, the Uranium One deal, involving top Clinton donors Frank Giustra and Ian Telfer, has transferred as much as 50 percent of projected American uranium production to Kremlin control. Now, that may not be as racy as the charges of sexual harassment (which may or may not turn out to be substantive) brought against Trump by heretofore unknown women, but it is certainly a more substantive matter for our national security, and there is far more evidence publicly available to lift it beyond the sensational and speculative. But the “prestige” press have elected to focus on the sex charges against Trump, rather than the possible treason involved in the Uranium One transaction, which is but one of many involving Russia.

As secretary of state, Hillary Clinton exercised crucial decision-making power on the Committee for Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) to approve the Russian government energy agency Rusatom’s purchase of majority control of Uranium One. Members of Congress were rightfully alarmed. Senator John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) was particularly concerned, since the proposed deal involved a large uranium mine in his state. He wrote to President Obama, noting the deal “would give the Russian government control over a sizable portion of America’s uranium production capacity” through Rusatom and its subsidiary, ARMZ. “Equally alarming,” Barrasso said, “this sale gives ARMZ a significant stake in uranium mines in Kazakhstan.”

But President Obama and Secretary Clinton ignored those concerns. And the Obama administration, via the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), apparently lied to Senator Barrasso when it assured him that ore from the Uranium One mine in Wyoming wouldn’t be exported. But it is indeed exporting uranium. Senator Barrasso was also assured that Uranium One would remain a public company, guaranteeing some measure of transparency. But it has since been taken private, with Putin’s company ARMZ now owning 100 percent of the stock.

Hillary Clinton’s State Department was signing off on the Russian takeover of Uranium One while the Clinton Foundation was taking in tens of millions of dollars from Uranium One exec Frank Giustra, and while Bill Clinton and Frank Giustra were zooming about the globe on Giustra’s private jet consummating mega-mining deals.

Building Putin’s Silicon Valley

On May 11, 2009, The New American published the online story “U.S., Russia ‘Reset’ the Convergence Agenda,” in which we reported: “When Secretary Clinton met with [Russian Foreign Minister] Lavrov in Geneva in March, she presented him with a yellow box with a large red reset button. Clinton and Lavrov then mugged for the cameras while both of them pushed the button together, symbolizing the dawning of a new cooperative relationship between the two powers.” And in a series of articles in 2010, we detailed the Obama-Clinton efforts to assist the Kremlin plans in building their own high-tech Silicon Valley, known as Skolkovo, with huge multi-billion dollar deals and transfers of U.S. technology from the likes of Microsoft, Intel, Cisco Systems, Boeing, IBM, and many more. Many of the Russian firms involved in this joint effort are key weapons manufacturers and primary actors in the Russian military-industrial complex. Why waste time, effort, and resources with espionage when your enemy is willing to give you everything, right?

One of Team Clinton’s strategic partners in this venture (whom we will see recurring in items below) was billionaire Russian oligarch Viktor Vekselberg, a close ally of Putin and president of the Skolkovo Foundation. He is also a board member of RUSNANO, the Russian State Investment Fund, as well as owner and president of the Renova Group, the huge Russian conglomerate that is at the center of a number of Clinton Foundation scandals, including Uranium One.

Money Laundering With Russian Oligarchs

One of the more notable deals to show up in WikiLeaks involves Clinton Foundation operatives, including Hillary’s campaign chairman John Podesta, in alleged money laundering with the above-mentioned Russian billionaire Viktor Vekselberg. Podesta, whom the New York Times has called “one of Washington’s biggest players,” is the former chief of staff to President Bill Clinton, former counselor to President Obama, and current chairman of the Soros-funded Center for American Progress. His brother, Tony Podesta, a wealthy Washington lobbyist/power broker, is his longtime “partner in crime.”

As with the cavalcade of shady deals and shady characters that became emblematic of unethical (and illegal) fundraising during Bill Clinton’s presidency — Lippogate, Buddhist Templegate, James Riady, Charlie Trie, Johnny Chung, Ted Sioeng, et al. — the current Clinton Foundation/Clinton State Department scandal sheet is littered with a confusing profusion of shady characters linked to a labyrinth of entities, including government agencies, NGOs, foundations, think tanks, companies, and shell companies. Only this is on a much grander scale than when Bill and Hillary were occupying the Oval Office as co-presidents.

Vekselberg’s and John Podesta’s dealings intertwine, for instance, at Joule Unlimited, a small Massachusetts-based energy company that attracted investments from Vekselberg and the Russian government. Joule Unlimited is owned by Joule Global Stichting and Joule Global Holdings, based in the Netherlands. Jerome Corsi reported, in an October 6, 2016 article for WorldNetDaily, that “Podesta had been paid an undisclosed amount for serving on the executive board of Joule Global Stichting, an appointment he neglected to report to regulatory authorities in the U.S.,” as required by law.

Podesta also reportedly received 75,000 shares of stock in Joule Unlimited, which undoubtedly netted Hillary’s chairman a handsome profit, thanks to a Russian “investment” of tens of millions of dollars in Joule. Vekselberg’s Renova Group and the Putin regime’s RUSNANO (on which Vekselberg serves as a board member) were the major investors. Vekselberg’s holdings are scattered through offshore accounts in Cyprus, the Bahamas, and the British Virgin Islands, which facilitates laundering of his proceeds. One of his conduits appears to be Renova Capital Partners, a Denver-based private equity group founded and owned by Philip Caplan. Caplan’s bio at the Renova company website notes that he had “a 17-year career in politics and government, capped by serving as Assistant to the President and Staff Secretary to Bill Clinton.”

A principal funnel for Vekselberg’s dark money is the Russian-based Metcombank, which the controversial oligarch owns. According to Jerome Corsi, “Metcombank is the bank Vekselberg is using to make clandestine transfers to the Clinton Foundation. The money goes through the Moscow branch of Metcombank via Deutsche Bank and Trust Company Americas in New York City, ending up in a private bank account in the Bank of America that is operated by the Clinton Foundation.”

So have Vekselberg, Putin & Co. lavished money on the Clintons because they believe so deeply in Bill and Hillary’s global “philanthropic” ventures? Or is there a quid pro quo here? Dr. Corsi writes that the “transfer of advanced U.S. technology to Russia, including both military technology and solar energy technology as part of Secretary Clinton’s ‘reset’ program” with Russia, “greatly enhanced the Russian military’s capabilities, according to both the FBI and the U.S. army.”

Pay-to-Play: “If This Story Gets Out, We Are Screwed”

The extent of the pay-for-play cronyism between Hillary’s State Department and Bill and Hillary’s Clinton Foundation is astounding. In fact, in a November 13, 2011, e-mail to John Podesta, Doug Band writes: “I’m also starting to worry that if this story gets out, we are screwed.” So who is Doug Band and why was he worried? Band, the president of Teneo Holdings, a global consulting firm, is the former personal assistant and counselor to President Bill Clinton, and was subsequently employed by the Clinton Global Initiative and the Clinton Foundation. At Teneo, he has been a major cultivator of funding for ex-president Clinton’s for-profit and non profit revenue streams. Bill Clinton, in turn, became honorary chairman of Teneo, a position for which he was scheduled to be compensated to the tune of $3.5 million — until Band’s e-mail to Podesta cited above, which was released by WikiLeaks, detailed some of the tens of millions of dollars he had secured for the Clintons. The e-mail was apparently precipitated by a turf feud that had developed between Band and Chelsea Clinton. Band told Podesta that Chelsea “is acting like a spoiled brat kid who has nothing else to do but create issues to justify what she’s doing because she, as she has said, hasn’t found her way and has a lack of focus in her life.” Band felt compelled to spell out his value to the Clintons.

“Throughout the past almost 11 years since President Clinton left office, I have sought to leverage my activities, including my partner role at Teneo, to support and to raise funds for the Foundation,” Band wrote. “This memorandum strives to set forth how I have endeavored to support the Clinton Foundation and President Clinton personally.”

“Independent of our fundraising and decision-making activities on behalf of the Foundation, we have dedicated ourselves to helping the President secure and engage in for-profit activities — including speeches, books, and advisory service engagements,” Band says. “With respect to business deals for his advisory services, [Teneo] found, developed and brought to President Clinton multiple arrangements for him to accept or reject. Of his current 4 arrangements, we secured all of them.” These arrangements, he noted, “have yielded more than $30 million for [Bill Clinton] personally, with $66 million to be paid out over the next nine years should he choose to continue with the current engagements.”

Doug Band provides Podesta with a breakdown of the amounts Teneo brought in from various “donors” to Clinton, including $4,330,000 from Coca-Cola, $4,276,841 from the Rockefeller Foundation, $780,000 from Dow Chemical, $540,000 from UBS, $1.1 million from Barclays Capital, and $1,401,332 from Laureate International University. This was in November 2011, remember, and much more funding has rolled in since then.

Like much of the rest of the funding listed, the timing of the Dow Chemical donations is more than merely interesting. In 2009, the chemical giant was in a pickle owing to the collapse of a $17.4 billion joint venture with a Kuwaiti state-owned company. Dow stood to lose $9 billion. With Band’s help, Dow CEO Anthony Liveris obtained special access to, and help from, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Band notes in his e-mail to Po­desta that one month after getting access to Secretary Clinton, Liveris invited former President Clinton and Band out for a day of golf — and then donated $500,000. Another $150,000 donation soon followed, to pay for former President Clinton to attend a Dow dinner at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. Then Li­veris provided a Dow corporate jet to fly Clinton and his foundation entourage to Korea. According to news reports, Dow subsequently paid Band/Teneo $2.8 million in 2011 and $16 million in 2012 for “consultancy services.”

The Dow experience is more ordinary than extraordinary for Clinton donors, which include authoritarian and totalitarian regimes, as well as corporations. “Under [Hillary] Clinton’s leadership, the State Department approved $165 billion worth of commercial arms sales to 20 nations whose governments have given money to the Clinton Foundation,” according to an analysis of State Department and foundation data, as reported by the International Business Times on May 26, 2015. That figure — derived from the three full fiscal years of Clinton’s term as secretary of state (from October 2010 to September 2012) — says the IBT report, “represented nearly double the value of American arms sales made to the those countries and approved by the State Department during the same period of President George W. Bush’s second term.”

The IBT analysis further noted that the “Clinton-led State Department also authorized $151 billion of separate Pentagon-brokered deals for 16 of the countries that donated to the Clinton Foundation, resulting in a 143 percent increase in completed sales to those nations over the same time frame during the Bush administration.”

Caught on Tape: Organizing Voter Fraud, Orchestrating Violence

Some of the most damning evidence of criminal activity by Hillary Clinton and her inner circle — including on-camera boasting admissions by top Democratic Party operatives — was exposed in 2016 by undercover video reporters for Project Veritas, the maverick news organization run by James O’Keefe. The explosive videos — which were ignored, dismissed, or condemned by the mainstream media Clinton hacks — featured admissions of criminal acts by Bob Creamer, Scott Foval, Cesar Vargas, Zulema Rodriguez, and Aaron Black, all of whom are veteran dirty-deeds strategists, “field generals,” or street provocateurs for the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and the Hil­lary Clinton Campaign. Among the most incriminatory statements are confessions by these political agents concerning their roles in rigging elections through massive voter fraud, inciting riots, and orchestrating violent confrontations at Republican events to discredit and disrupt their opponents’ campaigns.

Scott Foval, head of the Foval Group and the national field director for Americans United for Change, a left-wing group providing shock troops to the DNC, was captured on video by a Project Veritas undercover reporter posing as a Democrat donor seeking help to perpetrate voter fraud. Foval bragged: “It’s a very easy thing for Republicans to say, ‘Well, they’re bussing people in.’ Well, you know what? We’ve been bussing people in to deal with you f***ing a***holes for 50 years and we’re not going to stop now.” Foval’s profanity-laced sales pitch then got into nitty gritty details about how he and his colleagues engage in felonious acts to subvert the electoral process. According to Foval, it “doesn’t matter what the friggin’ legal and ethics people say, we need to win this motherf***er.”

New York lawyer Cesar Vargas (who is also a Mexican-born illegal alien) has been a key DNC operative helping to get illegal aliens into the voting stream. He tells Project Veritas’ “Democratic donor”: “Yeah, and for me I totally get it, this is illegal; this is something that can be done.”

Scott Foval revels in his criminal activity and proudly explains to the hidden camera how he scripts and organizes violent activists to disrupt Republican events, and then provides photos and video of the staged provocations to friendly media to discredit his opponents. His highest praise is reserved for his mentor (and employer), veteran DNC agent Bob Creamer, who runs Democracy Partners. Foval walked the Project Veritas reporter through the Clinton-DNC criminal labyrinth: “I am contracted to him [Bob Creamer]. But I answer to the head of special events for the DNC and the head of the special events and the political for the campaign.... The [Hillary Clinton] campaign pays DNC, DNC pays Democracy Partners, Democracy Partners pays the Foval Group, the Foval Group goes and executes the s**t on the ground.... We are the primary mechanism as a team. Democracy Partners is the tip of the spear on that stuff.”

Foval’s guru, Creamer, is seen on camera telling the undercover reporter: “The campaign is fully in it.... Hillary knows through the chain of command what’s going on.” President Obama is certainly “fully in it” also, since Creamer, no small fry, is on record as having visited the Obama White House 342 times! After the videos went public, Scott Foval was fired by the DNC and Creamer announced he is “stepping back” from his work with the Hillary Clinton campaign.

One of the most damning admissions comes from Creamer agent Zulema Rod­riquez, who is recorded taking credit for organizing the March 2016 anti-Trump riots in Chicago that resulted in police officers being injured and caused Trump to cancel his rally. FEC records show she was on the Clinton campaign payroll, and she tells the Project Veritas reporter she has “a call with the campaign and the DNC, every day at one o’clock.” She and her employers could (and should) be prosecuted for felony violation of state and federal laws (18 U.S. Code § 2101) against sedition and inciting a riot.

The Podesta-Clinton Kiddie-sex, Occult Cesspool

Just a few days before the November 8 presidential election, WikiLeaks released shocking e-mails from John and Tony Podesta regarding the extremely troubling issue of pedophilia/cannibalism/occult/Satanism inside the Clinton-Podesta ring of power. One important element in that ugly matrix is something called “Spirit Cooking,” a euphemism for a vile, occult form of “performance art” that, apparently, is a welcome dinner-party practice in the Podesta-Clinton social-political circles.

It involves a “recipe” that requires menstrual blood, semen, breast milk, and urine. Marina Abramović, a Serbian “artist” supported and courted by the Podesta brothers, is the most celebrated practitioner of “Spirit Cooking” on the scene today. She is not only a Hillary supporter, but is a spiritual/artistic guru to other Clinton celebrity endorsers, such as the absurdist pop star Lady Gaga.

Among the latest hacked e-mails from WikiLeaks is an “All my love” e-mail from Marina Abramović to Tony Podesta on June 28, 2015, asking if he will be attending the Spirit Cooking dinner at her place. And she wants to know if brother John will be coming too. Tony passes on the e-mail to John.

Marina Abramović, an unquenchable narcissist, has produced a revolting video of her Spirit Cooking (widely available online) and has posted many self-portrait videos and photos, including images in which she frames her face with the horns of a bloody goat skull, the symbol of Baphomet, one of the most common satanic images. Other portraits of the “artist” can be found online showing her with a mouthful of live snakes, as well as her signature fixation on death, cannibalism, and — in general — the lewd, crude, nude, and rude. In an apparent self-identification with the biblical Antichrist, her Twitter account is “@AbramovicM666.”

The Podesta-Abramović-Spirit Cooking revelations go beyond mere kinkiness; they come on the heels of a long train of verified stories that are interrelated, most especially regarding criminal activities with minors and children. There is, for starters, the long-running close relationship between Bill Clinton and hedge fund billionaire (and convicted pedophile) Jeffrey Epstein, whose Manhattan mansion and private island estate in the Caribbean have been the sites for many notorious sex parties — especially for Democratic politicians, celebrities, and high-end political donors. Flight logs for the mogul’s private jet, dubbed the “Lolita Express,” show Bill Clinton taking 26 trips. Hillary Clinton, reportedly, has also made at least six trips to Epstein’s lair, known as “Sex Slave Island.”

Hillary Clinton’s ties to Democratic Congressman Anthony Weiner and the most recent revelations coming from his computer underscore the fact that at the highest levels of power in Washington, D.C., top officials of both parties for many years have been winking at the criminal sexual exploitation of children by politicians and their high-placed friends. Only rarely do the offenses leak out in a way that ends up with prosecution of the powerful, as in the case of Republican Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert, a serial abuser of teenage boys. But as we have reported, Hastert was just the tip of the iceberg.

Related to this same subject matter are hacked WikiLeaks e-mails between Hil­lary Clinton and her then-top aide Cheryl Mills regarding one Laura Silsby, who was arrested and charged with child abduction and child trafficking in Haiti, after the island was devastated by a hurricane in January 2010. Silsby and nine others, posing as missionaries for a non-existent Christian orphanage, were apprehended by authorities while attempting to take a busload of Haitian children off the island. Silsby’s attorney was convicted felon Jorge Torres Puello, who, at the time, was a fugitive from U.S. authorities for alien smuggling. Thanks to intercession by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and former President Bill Clinton, Laura Silsby’s charges were reduced and she was allowed to leave Haiti with time served.

Some analysts and critics have suggested that Silsby was kidnapping the Haitian children to be sold to child sex rings. The evidence we have seen thus far does not prove that claim — but, at the very least, it must be seriously investigated, in light of the evidence available and the global crisis in child sex trafficking.

Endangering National Security

In her August 17, 2014 e-mail to John Podesta from her private, unsecured e-mail account, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. , Hillary Rodham Clinton clearly violated Title 18 U.S. Code § 798 (“Unauthorized Disclosure of Classified Information”) by sharing war plans in Iraq from U.S. and Western intelligence sources. “It’s unquestionably an OPSEC [operations security] violation,” Dr. John Schindler, a former NSA analyst and national security expert, told The Daily Caller News Foundation regarding the e-mail transmission. Clinton even begins her message to Podesta, who does not have security clearance, with this advisory: “Note: Sources include Western intelligence, US intelligence and sources in the region.” Thus, it would seem that, unless she flunked “Government 101” and “National Security for Dummies,” hrod17 knowingly violated U.S. law and willfully jeopardized national security. And this is but one of many similar violations exposed by WikiLeaks and other sources.

Moreover, State Department e-mails that a federal court ordered released to Judicial Watch confirm that not only Clinton, but also her former top aides at State (and current campaign advisors) Huma Abedin and Jake Sullivan illegally sent classified material via private e-mail accounts.

Saudi, Qatari Funding for ISIL/ISIS, Clinton Foundation

In her August 17, 2014 security-violating e-mail to John Podesta (cited above), Clinton includes an intelligence memo that states the governments of our “allies” Saudi Arabia and Qatar are funding the terrorist group ISIS/ISIL, our declared enemies. According to Clinton’s e-mail, “The governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia … are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL and other radical Sunni groups in the region.” This admission by the former secretary of state had never been acknowledged by Clinton in her official capacity, neither had any other U.S. official made such a claim publicly, although the Saudi funding of ISIS/ISIL has been widely accepted as a well-known fact. Nevertheless, the Clinton Foundation has accepted more than $10 million from the Saudi government since it was set up in 1997. And a Clinton Foundation e-mail of April 16, 2012 revealed that Qatar had given a William Jefferson Clinton a “$1 million check that Qatar promised for WJC’s birthday in 2011.”

Clinton Foundation Ties to Iran

On January 27, 2016, Dennis Cheng, the finance director of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, sent an e-mail to Clinton Foundation contributor Michael Bronfein and John Podesta expressing concern about the foundation’s cozy relationship with the “National Iranian American Council (NIAC), a notorious group with links to the Iranian regime.” Cheng, whom the pro-Clinton Daily Beast called “Hillary Clinton’s $2 Billion Money Man,” was concerned that a California fundraiser with Chelsea Clinton at the home of an NIAC official, Michael Chegini, “should worry Hillary’s pro-Israel backers.” Cheng writes:

“The Clintons never miss an opportunity to put money ahead of principle,” a spokesman for the Republican Jewish Coalition told me. “They should know better than raising money from folks whose primary concern has been supporting the NIAC — a notorious supporter of the Radical Islamic Mullahs in Iran. Instead as is always the case, the Clintons have thrown principle out the window in exchange for cold hard cash.”

Cheng appears to be concerned only about the impact that the Clintons’ ties to the Iranian regime will have on raising money from Jews and supporters of Israel. Millions of Americans, no doubt, will also be more concerned about what those ties mean for our nation’s security, as well as what they say about the Clinton Crime Family’s corruption of our entire political system.

The Corruption Goes On and On

The examples cited above are far from a complete itemized account of the myriad corrupt and criminal acts that call out for justice. Among the dozens (if not hundreds) of additional lawless acts of Hil­lary Rodham Clinton and the Clinton cartel that demand investigation and exposure (if not prosecution) are:

• Rigging the presidential debates: WikiLeaks e-mails showed Democratic National Committee Chair (and CNN commentator) Donna Brazile helping Hillary Rodham Clinton cheat by providing debate questions (which are supposed to be sequestered) ahead of time. The revelations forced CNN to sever ties with Brazile.

• Clinton ties to George Soros and the thugs, riot-makers he funds: WikiLeaks e-mails show communications between billionaire globalist George Soros and top Clinton staff members John Podesta, Robby Mook, and Huma Abedin. On October 7, 2014, Abedin writes to Mook, saying Secretary Hillary “is having dinner with George Soros tonight,” and Soros wants to know if she will be able to attend a fundraising dinner at his home in December for America Votes, a left-wing coalition effort he funds. Mook responds, “I would only do this for political reasons (ie to make Soros happy).”

• Implementing globalist agenda of Soros as official U.S. policy: WikiLeaks e-mails show Soros contacting Secretary Clinton to direct U.S. policy responses overseas, as for instance a Soros message regarding “Unrest in Albania,” where he has funded “protesters” and faux grassroots political organizations.

• Advocating and implementing “open borders” for Europe and the United States: In a WikiLeaks-disclosed speech to Latin American bankers, Hillary stated: “My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders.” She has supported every effort to break down borders in the United States and in Europe, including support for amnesty for illegal aliens and huge increases in acceptance of Muslim “refugees,” which she has publicly admitted cannot be vetted against security concerns.

• Hillary and Bill Clinton pushing “open borders” agenda for Clinton funder George Soros: Billionaire George Soros, along with his sons and his foundations, have poured millions of dollars into the Clintons’ political campaigns and the Clinton foundations. Secretary Clinton supported German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s disastrous refugee/migrant plan for Europe, which was designed by Soros agent Gerald Knaus. When Hungary and Poland took back control of their borders, they were blasted by Bill Clinton. Hungarian Prime Minister Vicktor Orbán, well aware of the Soros network’s hand in the “migration movement,” noted that “although the mouth belongs to Clinton, the voice belongs to Soros.”

• Attempting to bribe the FBI to change classified e-mails: FBI documents obtained by Judicial Watch under FOIA show Undersecretary of State Patrick Kennedy, a top lieutenant to Hillary Clinton, attempting to “bribe” or arm-twist the FBI into changing the classification of Hillary’s e-mails and putting “immense pressure” on State Department employees to rush the review process, to relieve Clinton of the e-mail security violation charges.

• Colluding with Department of Justice (DOJ) to subvert investigation: WikiLeaks e-mails disclose that Hillary Clinton’s staff was coordinating with the Obama DOJ regarding the DOJ’s “investigation” of Clinton’s illegal use of a private server to send classified material by e-mail. On June 29, 2016, Attorney General Loretta Lynch met on a private plane with Bill Clinton, just hours before the House Select Committee on Benghazi released its final report to the public.

The Clinton crime and corruption chronicle goes on and on. There will be a mighty chorus of partisans that will denounce any investigation and prosecution of these malefactions as purely political vengeance. However, failing to do so would be a crime against justice — and would be a guarantee that political corruption would multiply and that corrupt politicians would act with even more blatant impunity and brazenness.

Photo of Hillary Clinton: AP Images

This article is an example of the exclusive content that's only available by subscribing to our print magazine. Twice a month get in-depth features covering the political gamut: education, candidate profiles, immigration, healthcare, foreign policy, guns, etc. Digital as well as print options are available!