Jessica McCallin of the Telegraph records her reaction to the New Years Eve sexual assaults in Cologne, Germany: (H/T Alpha Game)

I was not surprised by the mass sexual attacks against German women during New Year’s Eve celebrations in Cologne. Shocked by the scale and the audacity of them, yes, but not remotely surprised. When Angela Merkel announced her decision to take in 800,000 refugees this summer, my sisters and I immediately predicted that this was going to lead to big problems for Western women. “If liberal Europe wants to continue with the current level of Muslim immigration it needs to have an urgent debate about how much cultural relativity it is prepared to tolerate” In 1993, when I was 17 and my sister were 12 and 11, our family moved to the Turkish capital, Ankara, because of my father’s job with the UN’s refugee agency, the UNHCR. For the next two years we were leered at, jeered at, hissed at, groped and touched, again and again and again, every single time we left the house. The only time this treatment lessened was if we went out with my father. Once I was groped and hit in the face right outside the president’s palace. The guards responded by hooting and laughing and shoving their pelvises at me.

Given that Muslims idolize a man who forcefully married a 6 year old, and then consummated their ‘union’ on her 9th birthday, I’m not the least bit shocked that Turks were sexually harassing her prepubescent sisters. The bestial nature of those who follow the Religion of Peace is widely known, especially amongst the Left’s intelligentsia who do everything in their power to cover it up, so I see little value in continuing to beat this dead horse.

What troubles me is the following phrases she uses in her article: “Not all Muslim societies allow such misogynistic behaviour… Naturally, the West is not always a bastion of sexual equality and respect. But in my experience the worst examples of misogyny do come from Muslim societies, and disproportionate numbers of Muslim men hold misogynist views.” Her use of ‘misogynistic’ in this context is troubling because it’s inaccurate: she’s mistaking a frog for a toad. And through its inaccuracies, it undermines the presumed goal of her writing, enabling rather than preventing further Islamic abuse of Western women.

H.L. Mencken once jokingly defined a misogynist as “A man who hates women as much as women hate one another.” While there’s a great deal of intellectual cachet in this bon mot, a witticism is not a definition; in fact, the whole point of a witticism is to turn a word on it’s head, to use absurdity to point towards a fundamental truth.

The truth that Mencken is pointing to is that men instinctively love women. We see purity in their souls, sonnets in their speech, and perfection in their forms. Women are often confused by this, as they know perfectly well how vicious, stupid, and ugly other women can be. Nonetheless this is human nature, and while it may be strange and inexplicable, any deviation from it is immediately recognized as monstrous and abhorrent.

What Mencken defines as ‘misogynist’ is merely a man who, through experience or wisdom, is able to overcome his natural inclinations and view women as they actually are. This is rare and shocking (and inconvenient) to the ladies, but it isn’t actually hatred. A man who truly hates women is a sick puppy indeed.

The actual misogynist is a psychologically damaged specimen, as twisted as a woman who gags at the thought of having a child – so she adopts a puppy instead. In both case, the adult is regressing to the age of first sexual awakening, and reliving the abuse at the hands of their opposite-sex parent. The misogynist recalls the cruelties inflicted upon him by a mother who resented him, and as an adult he craves this feminine, mothering attention, while still fearing it. He needs a woman to be psychologically complete – and yet he resents the feminine.

So he finds a woman who wants to be abused, and instead of cherishing her, he tears her down. The only way he can feel secure receiving feminine love is if shes’ been de-clawed, de-fanged, and locked in a cage. What a monstrous, pitiable creature he is.

The behaviour we see coming out of the Muslim world – abuse, exploitation, rape (Latin: rapere, to seize) – is not the modus operandi of the misogynist. He seduces like an obedient son, only to utter vicissitudes behind closed doors. The Muslim seizes women publicly as if they were chattel.

Because that is what women are in the Islamic world: chattel. They are not creatures of moral worth, to be cherished when they freely choose to submit, but to be crushed into obedience. For that matter, men are chattel too, to be crushed under the theocratic state. Where the Christian Occident honours our parents, they Islamic Orient obeys their parents. Any moral outrage they feel is directed onto the kafir.

Thanks to the perversities of Feminism (the same feminism which acts to cover up violent gang rapes) the word ‘misogynist’ has been stripped of its original meaning to conform to the tenets of the female imperative. It now means “Anything men do that women don’t like,” which is why McCallin can unironically refer to rape as ‘misogynistic’.

Rape is not misogyny. It is bestial and psychopathic, the behaviour of a brute. A misogynist desires the love of a woman in his own sick way; the rapist pursues nought but hedonism.

‘Misogyny’ is one of the linguistic Trojan Horses of those who want to destroy Western civilization. Definition A is the regressive monster, which all men feel contempt for, while Definition B is whatever behaviour a woman wishes to complain about. Misogyny: it’s double-plus ungood! Misusing it abuses and twists the language into Newspeak. It is no different than using the word ‘gender’ to refer to a person’s sex (a term coined by a practicing pedophile), and referring to Muslims as misogynists is linguistically infantile, no different than saying “I don’t like being raped!”

Nobody likes being raped, honey.

Employing the word so loosely does little to undermine Islam, while wreaking devastation on your fellow countrymen. Protecting our civilization from these brutes starts by respecting the men who will fight them. It starts by allowing fathers to say “You’re not going out dressed like that,” without causing a worldwide protest. It starts by respecting men, and accepting that you can’t always have your own way. It starts by rejecting the post-modern ideology which turns all people into interchangeable cogs, and labels as crimethink anybody who dares to stay faithful to our past.

You cannot flirt with feminism, anymore than you can be a little bit pregnant. Virtue isn’t a sometimes thing: it’s a way of life. And as dangerous as the enemies within our gates might be – its the enemies within ourselves who will ultimately see us destroyed.

Clear thought is the beginning of the resistance. It is time to cleanse your mind.