Vaccination Adverse Reactions Removed from Nursing Manuals … WHY?

By TLB Contributing Partner: Christina England, BA, Hons

Over the last couple of years, the general public have been prevented from learning the truth about vaccinations. Many of the websites that we have come to rely on to provide us with the truth about the possible dangers of vaccinations have been completely erased from search engines such as Google, making the truth very difficult for the public to discover.

Websites such as Health Impact News, VacTruth, Vaccine Impact, Learn the Risk, Natural News, and Greenmedinfo are becoming more and more difficult to find and many emails that we have been regularly receiving from these websites have been relegated to our spam folders, in the hope that we will not find and read them.

In a further bid to try to prevent us from learning about any possible dangers of vaccinations, YouTube and social media platforms such as Facebook have also joined in the war to hide any information that they deem to be anti-vaccination from their websites.

If all of this has not been difficult enough, Amazon have also pulled many of their books and DVDs on the subject of vaccination, autism and possible cures for the symptoms of autism from their website.

These books and DVDs include:

Healing the Symptoms Known as Autism by Kerri Rivera

As you can see, it has completely disappeared; however, you can still get a copy of this particular book from Goodreads.

However, if you are prepared to hunt for these books and DVDs you can find them available elsewhere.

I asked Ms. Rivera what she thought about Amazon removing her book from their website. She told us that:

“Whether you agree or disagree with what me or anyone else has to say, we all need to respect one another’s freedom of speech to say it. Amazon is not just a book seller. Amazon is a public space that is privately owned, albeit funded by my government to whom I pay taxes. I digress. In the olden days when a country won the battle over another, the winners would burn the libraries to erase the other’s history. This is the modern day book burning. On some level, it is as though there is conspiracy against those of us who have a difference of opinions. It is correct to say that those of us who have been successful at that which “they” have not and we affect their bottom line, “they” come out against us. It is an honor to be enemy #1 of the establishment since my CD protocol has been the most successful protocol in autism recovery ever. The unfortunate part is that people who need the information will not be able to find it. Many will needlessly suffer the pain and solitude of autism without knowing that there are options like mine available. I was the first person to have applied CD to autism in 2010. There was no backlash initially. Just recovery after recovery. Until those who make money off of others’ suffering got together and created a backlash. 2019 has been the year of overwhelming censorship in the USA. The USA is where Amazon, Facebook, PayPal, email servers like Yahoo who deleted my account overnight after 20 years. The list is long of those who have been censored and the tech companies control most. It is a sad day for the world when Julian Assange is rotting in a jail without a trial and books on curing autism have been banned and the support groups on Facebook have disappeared. George Orwell nailed it with his book 1984 written in 1949. He was light years ahead of the rest of us. And now here we are. The culture and its rich history destroyed. My heart breaks for the hundreds of thousands who will cry in pain day and night because their parents will never know that my CD protocol exists. Please share my email and website with anyone who has an autistic child. kerri@kerririvera.com”

We believe that she is correct. Why should these websites be allowed to censor information just because they do not like what is being said.

RollingStone, a website reporting on the news, reported that:

“Following an open letter to Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos from Rep. Adam Schiff, who has been vocal in the fight against promoting misinformation about vaccines, Amazon has taken steps to remove books promoting the view that vaccines cause autism, as well as anti-vaccine documentaries like Vaxxed; GoFundMe has similarly banned fundraising campaigns from anti-vaxxers, though it made a point of saying in a press release that such campaigns are “extremely rare” and the platform only had occasion to remove about 10 pages thus far.”

Whilst the public have had no choice but to put up with these antics, measures to cover up what many believe to be the truth about vaccination, appear to have been taken to the next level.

Censorship or Medical Fraud?

It is a fact that all drugs and vaccinations have adverse reactions. There is no drug or vaccine that is 100% safe and until this year, this information used to be provided to all nurses and doctors in nursing manuals such as the manual titled Mosbey’s Nursing Drug Reference.

In fact, as far back as 2013, the contraindications to every drug and vaccine were marked up very clearly in several manuals for nurses.

••••

••••

••••

However, this information appears to have changed. This year, in a manual titled Nursing 2019 Drug Handbook, the authors have decided, in their wisdom, to remove all references relating to contraindications to vaccines.

••••

••••

••••

••••

In fact, we have discovered that the adverse reactions to vaccination section was also removed from last year’s manual.

However interestingly, when we looked at the 2013 edition of this particular manual, the section on vaccination was not available online, therefore we presume that it did contain the adverse reaction section, as we have seen from the Mosbey’s edition.

We at The Liberty Beacon Project would like to know why. What do these authors have to hide and, more importantly, who is funding their work?

Surely, by removing any reference to adverse reactions to vaccinations from their manual, the authors are denying the medical staff who administer these vaccines information that could potentially put the lives of their patients at risk.

We believe that this is a step too far and that by omitting this information from their manuals, the authors are potentially putting hundreds of thousands of lives at risk.

If nurses are administering vaccinations to their patients and they are completely unaware that these vaccinations can cause adverse reactions, then this practice contradicts the Montgomery ruling on informed consent.

The Montgomery ruling was passed in the UK in 2015 and stated that:

“In a case where it is being alleged that a plaintiff has been deprived of the opportunity to make a proper decision as to what course he or she should take in relation to treatment, it seems to me to be the law, as indicated in the cases to which I have just referred, that if there is a significant risk which would affect the judgment of a reasonable patient, then in the normal course it is the responsibility of a doctor to inform the patient of that significant risk, if the information is needed so that the patient can determine for him or herself as to what course he or she should adopt.”

It continued that:

“Another current document (Consent: patients and doctors making decisions together (2008)) describes a basic model of partnership between doctor and patient: “” The doctor explains the options to the patient, setting out the potential benefits, risks, burdens and side effects of each option, including the option to have no treatment. The doctor may recommend a particular option which they believe to be best for the patient, but they must not put pressure on the patient to accept their advice. The patient weighs up the potential benefits, risks and burdens of the various options as well as any non-clinical issues that are relevant to them. The patient decides whether to accept any of the options and, if so, which one.””

Of course, if the doctor or nurse administering a vaccine is completely unaware that the vaccine could cause significant harm to their patient because they have been denied the knowledge to be able to offer their patient full informed consent, then they could not offer their patients informed consent, which would be very convenient indeed for any government wishing to implement mandatory vaccination for all.

For further information on the Montgomery Ruling and the US equivalent, please read:

••••

About the Author: Christina England was born and educated in London, U.K. She received an A Level in Psychology and a BTEC in Learning Disabilities. She has spent many years researching vaccines and adverse reactions. She has an HND in journalism and media and is currently writing for the American Chronicle, Green Med Info, The Liberty Beacon, the Weekly Blitz and Vaccination Truth on immunization safety and efficacy. Christina England has been a journalist since 2008. Her main areas of expertise are researching false accusations of child abuse and adverse reactions to vaccines. She has co-authored two books – Shaken Baby Syndrome or Vaccine Induced Encephalitis – Are Parents Being Falsely Accused? with Dr. Harold Buttram and Vaccination Policy and the UK Government: The Untold Truth with Lucija Tomljenovic PhD, which are sold on Amazon. Christina’s websites are Profitable Harm and Parents and Carers Against Medical Injustice

••••

••••

••••

Stay tuned to …

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.