And in the process he learned something awesome.

It's easy to be cynical about -- or perhaps merely bored by -- the annual profusion of best-of lists. There are simply so many that they begin to lose their meaning. What good is one best-of list, when hundreds of others lay their own claim to that superlative? The arbitrariness of any single list is laid bare by the sea of competing lists it swims among.*

But that vast sea might itself tell us something, if only we could see it all -- and that's the project writer and web developer David Gutowski has set himself to for five years, collecting all of the year's best-of-books lists into one massive meta-list, which he updates continuously on his site, Largehearted Boy, from mid-November to mid-January. He finds most of the lists through a couple dozen search strings he's developed over the years, and others are sent to him by readers, journalists, and other bloggers, he explained over email. As of today, he's collected 1,320 best books lists for 2012.

"Lists are pervasive in our culture -- even more so in the Internet age because they drive online traffic," he wrote. In the time since he started, Gutowski says he's seen some changes, as many media outlets try to compete for an original take -- for examples, he's observed an increasing number of negative lists (such as "worst books" or "most disappointing book"), more "most overlooked" lists, and more lists where famous authors are asked to name their own personal favorites.