A new opinion piece in the Louisiana State University student newspaper tells white women that their brand of feminism is “not inclusive.”

“White feminists should not call themselves feminists, but instead should call themselves sexist, racist and homophobic,” student Ashlon Lusk writes in the Daily Reveille.

“If you do not support bisexual Muslim women, you are not a feminist. If you do not support non-binary Latino men, you are not a feminist,” Lusk explains. “If you do not support women who get abortions, you are not a feminist. If you do not support immigrants, you are not a feminist.”

According to Lusk’s editorial, feminism goes beyond merely supporting women. True feminists must also support every gender identity and sexual preference, as well as abortion and mass immigration.

Lusk goes on to inform Caucasian individuals of a certain privilege that they possess merely for being white, and informs her readers that it is impossible to be racist or sexist towards a straight white man. In her opinion, since feminism must be inclusive, white men and women should always be mindful of their privilege because they are responsible for racism and sexism.

“Straight white men have the most privilege of any group in the entire world. They never have to endure bigotry. You can dislike a straight white man, but you cannot affect them by being racist or sexist,” writes Lusk. “Racism and sexism are institutions built by white men to bring down other races and genders to better themselves and keep themselves at the top of the ‘food chain.’”

Lusk concludes by complaining that feminists tend to focus too much on sexual equality, which she believes leads to too much emphasis on straight sexual equality, rather than other issues. Specifically, she believes feminists should focus more on issues like Black Lives Matter, and less on issues like Free the Nipple.

“White feminists tend to focus on things that either only help them or don’t include every group of people. They are usually advocating for sexual equality, which is still important, but not inclusive,” writes Lusk. “Sexual equality, in theory, is very important, but straight sexual equality is usually the only thing being talked about. ‘Free the Nipple’ is an important movement, but there are bigger movements to fight for, like Black Lives Matter.”

In case there was any question as to whether a white, pro-life woman would be welcomed by ultra-left feminists at a movement such as the Women's March, Lusk has given us an answer. And of course, that answer is no.

John Patrick (@john_pat_rick) is a graduate of Canisius College and Georgia Southern University. He interned for Red Alert Politics during the summer of 2012 and has continued to contribute regularly.