The former City Hall staffer suing the city and Los Angeles City Councilman Mitch Englander’s chief of staff alleging harassment will reveal her identity to comply with a new court ruling, her attorney said Friday.

A Los Angeles Superior Court judge ruled Thursday the woman can’t file as a Jane Doe in court documents, so the plaintiff will use her name, her attorney Bradley Benham said.

He declined to release her name on Friday.

“We will comply with the court’s order,” Benham said. “Our client won’t be deterred,”

The staffer, who worked as a field deputy in Englander’s office until April 2013, filed the lawsuit in September alleging harassment and discrimination, and maintains that chief of staff John Lee “repeatedly made inappropriate and offensive jokes and comments of a sexual nature in front of and directed at (the woman).”

Councilman Englander is also accused of making inappropriate remarks.

The woman alleged she was paid less than her male colleagues and wasn’t allowed to professionally advance, which caused her to leave the office.

Englander, through a spokeswoman, has denied the charges. In court documents, attorneys for Lee and the city dispute that she was paid less than someone in her same position in the office.

A trial is set for June 2015.

Lee Frank, a Gardena-based attorney who specializes in harassment and discrimination lawsuits against employers, said the judge’s order this week isn’t surprising.

“I can’t think of a situation in a civil harassment case where you would use a Jane Doe,” Frank said.

Jane Doe filings more are common in criminal cases, where the woman has been a victim of violence, or is seeking protection. Minors’ identities are also sometimes protected, he said.

Attorneys in City Attorney Mike Feuer’s office have repeatedly challenged the woman’s lawsuit. In April, attorneys unsuccessfully sought to dismiss the case by questioning the timeline of the alleged victim’s assertions and stating she failed to prove her claims of retaliation.

Feuer’s attorneys also argued against the use of a Jane Doe filing by questioning the woman’s claim that Lee was part of a group of “widely-known, broadcasted public figures,” and her assertions that the case would attract media attention.

A statement from Feuer’s office on the judge’s ruling wasn’t immediately available.

Frank said he believes a plaintiff in a civil harassment case can benefit from going public. “Anytime you can get your versions of the events out there, it’s good thing,” Frank said.

The case against Lee is one of two high-profile harassment cases targeting a City Council office. City Councilman Jose Huizar is being sued by former staffer Francine Godoy in a case set to go to trial in November.