In an article penned by Jonathan Watts of the Guardian yesterday, Feb 19, 2020 he wrote:

“The oil and gas industry has had a far worse impact on the climate than previously believed, according to a study indicating that human emissions of fossil methane have been underestimated by up to 40%. Although the research will add to pressure on fossil fuel companies, scientists said there was cause for hope because it showed a big extra benefit could come from tighter regulation of the industry and a faster shift towards renewable energy. Methane has a greenhouse effect that is about 80 times more potent than carbon dioxide over a 20-year period and is responsible for at least 25% of global heating, according to the UN Environment Programme.”

Methane only makes up 0.00017% of the atmosphere (1.7 parts per million by volume), it is 23,530 times less abundant than water molecules, which averages out at 40,000ppm, and 235 times less abundant than carbon dioxide, which is estimated to be about 400ppm at present – a level much lower than it has historically been throughout Earth’s history. (During the Precambrian and Cambrian eras, it was in the region of 7,000ppm, coral reefs evolved and flourished during this period as did many of the genera that we see today).

In the same article as above, Jonathan also states:

“The findings, published in Nature, suggest the share of naturally released fossil methane has been overestimated by “an order of magnitude”, which means that human activities are 25-40% more responsible for fossil methane in the atmosphere than thought. This strengthens suspicions that fossil fuel companies are not fully accounting for their impact on the climate, particularly with regard to methane – a colourless, odourless gas that many plants routinely vent into the atmosphere.”

Obviously, Jonathan is not a scientist as if he were, he would know that the tiny amounts described in this study could not have an effect due to the well-established and proven “ideal gas law” — which relates to the properties of and measurable effects of P (pressure) × V (volume) = n (number of moles) × R (the gas constant) × T (temperature in Kelvin). This law alone explains why the temperature of Venus is +462 Celsius whilst the temperature on Mars is -60 Celsius despite the carbon dioxide concentration on Venus being 96.5% CO2 and that on Mars being 95.32% CO2. The difference between the two planets is their atmospheric pressure, Venus = 1348.85 psi; and Mars = 0.088 psi.

Clearly it is the atmospheric pressure that is determining the differences in surface temperature between these two planets, as well as their relative proximity to the sun. Therefore, minuscule additions of either CO2 or CH4 can have little, if any, affect on climatic temperature. This observation alone is the proof that the entire concept of “Manmade or induced Climate Change” is a farce.







Also, the assertions of this study and the article referencing it pay little heed to the fact that practically all the modeled effects postulated are masked by water vapor in the atmosphere, and are therefore impossible to measure in a dynamic fluid system like that of our planet.

It’s a shame that the Guardian does not have an editorial team who fact-check their articles before they go to print…

I know, I know.

Silly me.

“Shut up and pay your taxes.”





Social Media channels are restricting Electroverse’s reach — be sure to subscribe to receive new post notifications by email (the box is located in the sidebar >>> or scroll down if on mobile).

And/or become a Patron, by clicking here: patreon.com/join/electroverse

The site receives ZERO funding, and never has.

Any way you can, help us spread the message so others can survive and thrive in the coming times.





Grand Solar Minimum + Pole Shift