Rep. James Clyburn (S.C.), the third-ranking Democrat in the House, said special counsel Robert Mueller Robert (Bob) MuellerCNN's Toobin warns McCabe is in 'perilous condition' with emboldened Trump CNN anchor rips Trump over Stone while evoking Clinton-Lynch tarmac meeting The Hill's 12:30 Report: New Hampshire fallout MORE’s conclusions are “bigger than Watergate” and suggested President Trump Donald John TrumpBiden on Trump's refusal to commit to peaceful transfer of power: 'What country are we in?' Romney: 'Unthinkable and unacceptable' to not commit to peaceful transition of power Two Louisville police officers shot amid Breonna Taylor grand jury protests MORE would have been indicted if he weren't a sitting president.

“It may not be as big as a lot of the crises that we have had as a nation, but this is bigger than Watergate was. All you’ve got to do is look at this report and you know, that but for his status as president of the United States, this president would have been indicted for obstruction of justice, and there are 10 or 12 instances in the Mueller report that indicate that,” Clyburn said on MSNBC Thursday.

Rep. Clyburn on Chairman Nadler's 'constitutional crisis' comment: “This is bigger than Watergate was. All you've got to do is look at this report.” pic.twitter.com/ZzoB9TxRi6 — MSNBC (@MSNBC) May 9, 2019

Though Mueller found insufficient evidence to suggest that any Trump associates conspired with Moscow during Russia's efforts to interfere in the 2016 election, he declined to make a prosecutorial judgement on whether Trump had obstructed any subsequent probes, specifically citing Justice Department guidelines saying a sitting president cannot be indicted.

ADVERTISEMENT

Attorney General William Barr Bill BarrHarris faces pivotal moment with Supreme Court battle Hillicon Valley: DOJ proposes tech liability shield reform to Congress | Treasury sanctions individuals, groups tied to Russian malign influence activities | House Republican introduces bill to set standards for self-driving cars McCarthy threatens motion to oust Pelosi if she moves forward with impeachment MORE and former Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein Rod RosensteinDOJ kept investigators from completing probe of Trump ties to Russia: report Five takeaways from final Senate Intel Russia report FBI officials hid copies of Russia probe documents fearing Trump interference: book MORE later told Congress that they would not bring any obstruction charges after reviewing Mueller’s underlying evidence.

Democrats have seized on Mueller’s comments concerning obstruction of justice, particularly regarding 10 “episodes” he cited that may detail obstructive acts from Trump.

House committee chairs have since ramped up their oversight efforts over the Trump administration, launching a slew of probes both related to and independent of the Mueller investigation.

The administration has fought back, with Barr declining to appear in front of the House Judiciary Committee and the White House declaring executive privilege over the Mueller report and preventing a former White House lawyer, Don McGahn, from testifying. House Democrats have responded by issuing more subpoenas and holding Barr in contempt of Congress.

“I would define it as a confrontational crisis. That’s exactly what it is,” Clyburn said.

“In a time when you have such divisions between the branches of government as we have between the executive and legislative, and looking for the judiciary to step in to moderate or help us navigate through this, that’s a crisis situation.”