ATTORNEY-General Jarrod Bleijie has declared it's the judiciary's right to voice its dissatisfaction about new laws in Queensland, saying community debate on the issue was "healthy".

Speaking on ABC radio, Mr Bleijie declined to comment directly on the refusal by Supreme Court Judge George Fryberg to hear a bail matter for an alleged Bandido bikie because of the Premier's statements.

Justice Fryberg yesterday adjourned the case after seeking a withdrawal of Premier Campbell Newman's suggestion the judiciary was out of touch and should act according to what the community wanted.

LAWS: Premier vs Justice in bikie war

OPINION: Anti-gang laws vital to shield innocents

Mr Bleijie said it was healthy to have such a public debate about laws among politicians and the judiciary.

"I think the community debate is healthy, it's good, we live in a democracy and I think everyone including politicians and judiciary should respect each other's views and respect the view that we're allowed to have those views," said Mr Bleijie.

"Politicians for years have commented on cases before the courts.

"You can't silence politicians from having a say on these matters.

"As the leader of the state, the leader of the government the Premier is entitled to have a view and if that view is looked at in some quarters as being not well received then that's their prerogative."

Mr Bleijie insisted the government had not singled out any single judge for criticism even though that had occurred under the previous Labor government.

"There have been many, many cases where a politician has attacked a particular judge," he said.

Mr Newman highlighted a number of incidents in parliament yesterd

ay where previous Labor Ministers had attacked particular decisions by the judiciary.

The only specific case distributed to the media related to an attack by former Attorney-General Rod Welford on Justice Fryberg over his release of a child sex offender in 2005.