Each year Buffalo Trace releases the Buffalo Trace Antique Collection (BTAC), which represents a cross-section of American Whiskeys spanning a wide range of ages, proofs, and styles. In the bourbon industry, BTAC is widely revered as some of the absolute best and most highly sought after American Whiskeys released each year, setting the bar high for competitors as well as subsequent releases of each expression within the Antique Collection itself. While the expressions remain relatively consistent from year to year, each year’s vintage brings with it unique nuances relative to previous releases. Because demand for these whiskeys has greatly outpaced supply, bourbon enthusiasts frenzy to get their hands on these whiskeys each year. So just how does 2016’s Antique Collection fare? Our tasting notes and overall thoughts on each brand follow.

Dry and arid consisting of cigar box, aged oak, dried leather, and a healthy dose of ethanol upfront with hints of dark chocolate and raisins layered in. Sweeter than the nose would lead you to believe, I am surprised that this seems to drink lower than the listed 126.2 proof. A healthy dose of rye spice along with raisins, honey, and toffee are all present. The finish is where Handy reminds me that this is a barrel proof rye, as one way to sum it up is HOT! This is a finish where the heat lingers with you for a while, starting by enveloping my mouth all the way down to my stomach. Rye spice, white pepper, and oak are most noticeable with the oak lingering with the heat the longest.​ When directly comparing this to a 2014 Handy that I sampled this next to, I found the 2016 version to contain a more layered nose and more flavorful palate. Finish-wise, they both contained that familiar Handy heat which is exemplary of the brand. Compared to years past, I found this year's Handy to be one of the bolder and tastier releases in recent memory and look forward to drinking more of it in the future.



It should be noted that after the tasting I added a few drops of water to see how it would impact the experience. While a few drops seemed to slightly tame the heat in the finish, it also muted the overall flavors of the nose and the palate too. I’d recommend trying this one neat first and then adding water or ice to preference. -Jordan

Quite pleasant and inviting with hints of seasoned oak, vanilla, and dark fruits. Dry upfront. Seasoned oak is most prevalent, with dark cherries, a bit of caramel, and light spice in the background. It’s rather one-dimensional, though what it offers is pleasant.​ Long and dry. Seasoned oak dominates upfront with the sweeter elements quickly fading out. The oak flavor turns a bit south, as if aged a bit too long. I might describe the finish as over-oaked, but in a slightly different way than I’ve ever experienced, turning to a slightly soggy oak flavor and doing just enough damage to notice something is off. It’s not bad by any means, but a little surprising considering the established quality of the brand.​ The Eagle Rare 17 Year brand has surprised me. Aside from this sample, I have one bottle open, a 2013 vintage. I didn’t particularly love it at first, but a few pours deep and its nuanced flavor profile has really grown on me. Additionally, about a year ago I had a flight of all five Antique Collection bottles, varying years. The Eagle Rare 17 Year was a 2009 vintage, and to my surprise the most enjoyable pour of the bunch. Now I would typically list Eagle Rare 17 Year as my least favorite bottle of the Antique Collection, but for whatever reason it seems to have really hit the spot on a number of occasions and if I had to make a general list, not specific to vintage, Eagle Rare 17 Year might be somewhere in the middle.



A prominent whiskey reviewer suggested that this might be one of the best, if not the best, Eagle Rare 17 Year expressions to date. Unfortunately, I did not arrive at the same conclusion. Tasted next to the 2013 vintage, this year’s Eagle Rare 17 Year was an obvious second place with a lack of dimension and slightly off taste by comparison. I even stepped out of the box and tasted it against Orphan Barrel Barterhouse, a bourbon we listed as an alternative to Eagle Rare 17 Year, and for me the two were just about on par with one another. I suspect this year’s Eagle Rare 17 Year will get better as the bottle breathes, and while still a good bourbon, it’s a disappointment overall. -Nick

For being a 144.1 proof, I’m surprised by how tolerable this nose is. Don’t get me wrong there’s a big dose of ethanol that dominates much of the nose, but not much more than was found in this year's Thomas H. Handy release. Hiding behind the ethanol is burnt caramel, toasted oak, and a hint of toasted marshmallow. A big smack to the face as the palate brings you right back to the realization that you’re drinking a 140+ proof bourbon. On first sip, heat, heat, and more heat dominate the palate. This is also where you begin to notice the age of this year's Stagg as heavily charred oak, aged leather, and caramel mix with a touch of vanilla. The heat continues to dominate the finish upfront, with the backend consisting of aged oak, caramel, and a lingering flavor of dry leather.​ The bourbon world was abuzz when Buffalo Trace announced they would release another 140+ proof version of Stagg. Whiskeys in excess of 140 proof are commonly referred to as a “hazmat”, due to the fact that it’s against the law to pack in your checked luggage when flying due to the high alcohol content qualifying as a hazardous material. Additionally, with so much of this year's Stagg lost to the “Angel’s Share”, expectations were high to taste a bourbon that lost so much to evaporation while aging in the barrel.



Unfortunately, I feel that this year's Stagg just didn’t meet expectations. Even adding a few drops of water did nothing to tame the nose, however it did slightly sweeten the palate and the backend of the finish ever so slightly. The heat is incredibly dominant, and while that is to be expected with a 144.1 proof bourbon, combined with the fact that it tastes over-aged and over-oaked results in a less than stellar experience. While still good, this year’s Stagg is certainly not the best tasting Stagg released in recent years, falling far short of what has become expected of the brand.



The good news is that this may end up opening up nicely. The 2012 version of Stagg was also 140+ proof, and weighed in at 142.8 proof. It also made for a great comparison to do a side by side against. Containing many similar qualities, the 2012 version seems to have opened up really nicely with a little air time in the bottle and hopefully this year's version will do the same down the road. Until that time get ready for a hot over-age tasting bourbon experience. -Jordan

Delicate notes of gingerbread, vanilla, and baking spices overlay a slightly more potent bed of oak. The caramel notes are a bit more robust than needed, and that might have a lot to do with the nose being a bit more pedestrian than previous years. It’s far from unique and has many similarities with the majority of rye whiskeys on the market. ‍ Big and bold. At 90 proof, it comes across a lot hotter than the proof suggests, which unfortunately dampens some of the palate’s flavor. Equal amounts of black pepper, ginger, and nutmeg give way to seasoned wood and a dash of clove.​ The boldness of the palate mellows and gives way to a gentle cinnamon aftertaste. Even further on the backend the cinnamon combines with spice notes and turns it into a mild “Red Hot” fireball aftertaste. Overall drier and spicier than previous years. The silky smoothness that Sazerac 18 Year has been known for cannot be said of this year’s edition. It was always a bit of a miracle how smooth and balanced the tanked batch of Sazerac 18 Year always was. Despite the perceived trials and tribulations Buffalo Trace must have went through to try mimic that now legendary batch, it’s a bit disheartening of this year’s result. The 2016 edition is certainly good, some may even call it great, but it’s impossibly far from being called legendary. Calling this year’s Sazerac 18 Year bolder and spicier might sound intriguing, but it’s the worse thing that could have happened to the brand. This year’s Sazerac 18 Year isn’t much different than many other high-aged ryes on the market. Where it once held rank with the most elite ryes, it now holds company with the general populous ryes. Maybe it will be able to return one day to its former glory. Here’s hoping. -Eric

Wonderfully rich and warm, with notes of cinnamon, baking spices, and plum. Not overly complex, but enough scents are present and they’re represented well. Just the right amount of oaky base helps round out the nose. Molasses, dark cherries, dark chocolate, and vanilla all blend together to create an enjoyable burst of flavor. Its sweetness is offset by its oak barrel influence and its thick mouthfeel makes you think at times you can chew it. Just the right amount of complexity and drinkability. A straightforward classic style finish that’s warm, bold, and slowly says goodbye. As the palate’s flavors dissipate, additional minor notes of pine, coffee, and tobacco are introduced.​ William Larue Weller has always been a large and in charge bourbon, and while its heat can sometimes overpower its flavors, its richness always makes up for it. At 12 years and 7 months old, there’s a nice balance of flavors and barrel influence, with not one outdoing the other. Once again this year’s edition provides an enjoyable layer of depth and complexity and despite its 135.4 proof, is hot, but never harsh. In fact, compared to some of the higher proof previous editions, a few proof points less goes a long way curbing its hardness and making it overall a very enjoyable drinker. This year’s edition might lack some of the bells and whistles from previous years (e.g. higher age, higher proof, and oddball flavor notes), but its matter-of-fact nature might actually become its most celebrated attribute. -Eric