HEADS-UP: A ton has changed since this post was originally published!

Why not check out the latest comparison? A ton has changed since this post was originally published!

Yes, Linode announced a $5 plan. You can check out the $5 Showdown: Linode vs. DigitalOcean vs. Lightsail vs. Vultr

Yes #2, Linode made some changes to their $10 plan, increasing the storage a bit and kicking up their network out. I have updated the post to reflect the network changes.

Amazon caught me off guard this week with a VPS offering that mirrors the pricing of DigitalOcean and potentially rivals the quality of Linode.

Curious how things compared, I am revisiting my last Linode vs. DigitalOcean post from July 2016 and bringing Lightsail in the mix.

Let the best VPS win!

Overview

Even though Lightsail is offering a 5 dollar plan, Linode does not. Because of this, I am comparing hosting plans at the 10 dollar price point. Also, all of the benchmarks were generated on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS system.

Linode DigitalOcean Lightsail Memory 2GB 1GB 1GB Processor 1 Core 1 Core 1 Core Storage 30GB SSD 30GB SSD 30GB SSD Transfer 2TB 2TB 2TB Overage $0.02/GB $0.02/GB $0.09/GB Network In 40Gbps 1Gbps ??? Network Out 1000Mbps 1Gbps ??? Price $10/month $10/month $10/month $0.015/hour $0.015/hour $0.013/hour

If simply comparing plans, Linode wins if you need more RAM but lacks in storage compared to both DigitalOcean and Amazon Lightsail.

What’s interesting to note is that Lightsail’s network overage is 4.5x that of Linode and DigitalOcean. If you only need a server for a couple of hours, Lightsail’s pricing is a few fractions of a cent better.

Unfortunately, I don’t have a reliable number for Amazon’s network throughput for Lightsail. There is a network comparison later on though, so all is not lost.

CPU

sysbench --test = cpu run

Linode DigitalOcean Lightsail Number of Events 10,000 10,000 10,000 Execution Time 12.6811s 14.8737s 11.5520s Minimum Request 1.24ms 1.37ms 1.03ms Average Request 1.27ms 1.49ms 1.16ms Maximum Request 3.78ms 13.54ms 2.19ms

Lightsail is off to a good start clocking in a full second below Linode and even moreso against DigitalOcean.

Memory (read)

sysbench --test = memory run

Linode DigitalOcean Lightsail Number of Events 104,857,600 104,857,600 104,857,600 Execution Time 47.7652s 96.0324s 72.7207s Minimum Request 0.00ms 0.00ms 0.00ms Average Request 0.00ms 0.00ms 0.00ms Maximum Request 9.72ms 8.76ms 19.83ms MB/sec 2,143.82 1,066.31 1,408.13

Linode reads from memory twice as fast as DigitalOcean and Lightsail ended up a distant 2nd to Linode. Perhaps something to be said about having more RAM?

Memory (write)

sysbench --test = memory --memory-oper = write run

Linode DigitalOcean Lightsail Number of Events 104,857,600 104,857,600 104,857,600 Execution Time 47.0562s 74.9946s 72.1367s Minimum Request 0.00ms 0.00ms 0.00ms Average Request 0.00ms 0.00ms 0.00ms Maximum Request 9.33ms 4.05ms 0.33ms MB/sec 2,176.12 1,084.67 1,419.53

Aside from DigitalOcean, the other hosting providers showed write speeds consistent with the read speeds. What’s interesting is that Amazon’s maximum request was absurdly low compared to Linode yet somehow couldn’t process as many megabytes per second.

File I/O

sysbench --test = fileio prepare sysbench --test = fileio --file-test-mode = rndrw run sysbench --test = fileio cleanup

Linode DigitalOcean Lightsail Number of Events 10,000 10,000 10,000 Execution Time 0.9361s 1.8158s 4.9561s Minimum Request 0.00ms 0.00ms 0.00ms Average Request 0.04ms 0.08ms 0.14ms Maximum Request 4.10ms 4.53ms 3.52ms Requests/sec 10,682.79 5,507.67 2,017.73

Linode’s SSD is nearly twice as fast as DigitalOcean’s. DigitalOcean’s SSD is more than double the speed of Amazon Lightsail’s.

Question is, do you want more space or faster disk access?

OLTP with MySQL

mysql -uroot -e "CREATE DATABASE sbtest;" sysbench --test = oltp --oltp-table-size = 1000000 --mysql-user = root prepare sysbench --test = oltp --oltp-table-size = 1000000 --mysql-user = root run sysbench --test = oltp --oltp-table-size = 1000000 --mysql-user = root cleanup

Linode DigitalOcean Lightsail Number of Events 10,000 10,000 10,000 Execution Time 31.6980s 54.2631s 46.3136s Minimum Request 2.27ms 3.10ms 2.22ms Average Request 3.16ms 5.42ms 4.63ms Maximum Request 15.77ms 40.84ms 85.15ms Read/write Requests/sec 5,994.07 3,501.46 4,097.89

Amazon performed better than DigitalOcean but not nearly as well as Linode. Amazon had slightly better minimum request time but the maximum request time was double that of DigitalOcean’s. Linode’s min and max request times have a significantly tighter range.

Network

Network speed benchmarks are generated by speedtest-cli.

Out of the gate, DigitalOcean touts a significantly faster network and I don’t have any numbers for Amazon Lightsail. If anybody knows what Amazon is offering network-wise with Lightsail, please comment below.

Linode DigitalOcean Lightsail Download Mbit/sec 1,895.03 844.65 161.76 Upload Mbit/sec 456.75 441.93 385.58

SpeedTest.net picks different servers each time, so it’s hard to get an apples to apples comparison. Amazon’s download speed was pretty horribad compared to both DigitalOcean and Linode. Upload on the otherhand, Linode followed by DigitalOcean were neck and neck with Amazon bringing up the rear.

Conclusion

Not too far off from my previous posts, Linode seems to be the all around best bet. DigitalOcean and Amazon Lightsail are for the most part equivalent at the 10 dollar price point.

Between DigitalOcean and Lightsail, you would need to prioritize between memory and file I/O. Based on Amazon’s overage pricing, I would favor DigitalOcean.

A couple of non-benchmark things worth mentioning. First, and perhaps this is more of a self-serving sentiment, but Amazon does not offer any sort of affiliate program for Lightsail or any other of their web services.

The other thing is that Amazon does not offer free DNS hosting. Their service is negligibly priced at 40 cents per million queries. I have no idea how many DNS queries per month any of my sites do. I do know that I don’t spend anything on DNS hosting with Linode or DigitalOcean or even CloudFlare.

Amendment I ended up focusing on the fact that Amazon is charging at all for DNS and failed to realize that you do get up to 3 DNS zones and unlimited records for free. You get 3 million queries per month and anything above that is $0.40 per million queries. Still not entirely free but based on your DNS volume it is probably sufficient.

As always, your mileage may vary based on your own requirements. As for me, I’m still happy with Linode and Amazon’s recent VPS offering doesn’t sway me at all.

If you happen to find this post helpful when deciding on your next hosting solution, I’ll love you forever if you sign up using my referral links for Linode and DigitalOcean.

As mentioned, Amazon doesn’t do the whole affiliate thing, but you could grab me something cheap from my Amazon Wish List or even better, be a real MVP and make a donation to the Wounded Warrior Project.

And as always if you end up signing up, hit me up on Twitter and let me know about it!