After an exhaustive search of every known article or source discussing Lisa Page’s departure from the Mueller team, the closest we could narrow it down was in an online story by CBS News: Special counsel attorney departs for FBI. Even that, though, left wriggle room:

Page, who was an attorney with the FBI’s Office of the General Counsel, returned to the FBI in mid-July [2017], special counsel spokesman Peter Carr confirmed to CBS News’ Andres Triay.

Mid-July? Well, just how “mid” in July was it, and why not just give the date? As we reviewed and re-reviewed our time-line of the Mueller sideshow, a curious coincidence rose up out of it, one so curious, so perplexing, that we decided there was no other course but to ask Peter Carr directly. And so I did, in an email dated 8 May 2018:

Dear Mr. Carr, I am a research associate for Omen Books, an imprint of Chalet Books & Multimedia, and for Chalet’s news and information site, Chalet Reports. I have been tasked to compile research for an upcoming investigative report. Specifically, I am writing to you to request the exact date on which Lisa Page left Mr. Mueller’s Special Counsel team. My task has been made difficult by various media outlets, some of them quoting you, claiming she left the team anywhere from “mid June” to late September 2017, and several vague time frames in between. Given that her departure unquestionably is a matter of record, I would be grateful if you would give me the exact date: day, month, and year. Thank you for your time and kind attention. David Reznor

To his credit, Mr. Carr sent an email to me the same day—and while it could be called a reply, it could not be called a response:

Hi David, Thank you for reaching out to us. All that we have provided publicly is the following: “Lisa Page is an attorney brought on through a short-term detail from the FBI’s Office of the General Counsel, and she returned to the FBI in mid-July 2017.” Best,

Peter Carr

It was nothing more than what we already had read elsewhere. And that “mid-July” dodge was troubling for a very specific reason, which I spelled out to him in a follow-up that I sent back to him that day. Read on …

TRISKAIDEKAPHOBIA

That word above is defined as “fear or a phobia concerning the number 13.” I don’t know if Robert Mueller might be a triskaidekaphobe, or perhaps Peter Carr himself, but in our research, the number 13 had begun to loom large in relation to July of 2017. So I explained it in detail to Mr. Carr:

Hello Peter, Thank you for sending me an email. You wrote: >All that we have provided publicly is the following: “Lisa Page is an

>attorney brought on through a short-term detail from the FBI’s Office

>of the General Counsel, and she returned to the FBI in mid-July 2017.” Yes, we at Chalet Reports are intimately, exhaustively familiar with what you have “provided publicly” prior to now, and “mid-July” is vague enough—especially in relation to other events around that time—that it reasonably could be viewed as a term of art. For our purposes, that is compounded by the fact that you also have been quoted as saying: “Lisa Page completed her brief detail and had returned to the FBI weeks before our office was aware of the allegations” about the Strzok-Page texts.

www.cnn.com/2017/12/02/politics/fbi-agent-removed-trump-investigation/index.html In fact, that fog of uncertainty as to dates is exactly why I wrote to you at all. According to our best information and belief, the Special Counsel, Robert Mueller, was made “aware of the allegations” on Thursday, 27 July 2017, by the DOJ Inspector General, along with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.

dailycaller.com/2017/12/13/new-details-emerge-about-discovery-of-fbi-agents-anti-trump-texts/ In your quote by CNN above, you use the language that Page returned to the FBI “weeks before” that. You omit the number of “weeks.” Did you mean two weeks? If so, that would make her return to the FBI on Thursday, 13 July 2017, which hangs us on the horns of a curious coincidence: Thursday, 13 July 2017

CNN reports that Peter Strzok has been brought onto the team for Mueller’s Special Counsel investigation.

www.cnn.com/2017/07/13/politics/peter-strzok-special-counsel-russia-fbi/index.html You see the problem? So did Lisa Page “return to the FBI” on the very same day that Peter Strzok was brought onto the Special Counsel’s team—Thursday, 13 July 2017? If not, did she return to the FBI before that date, or after that date? On what specific date did she return to the FBI? This was my original question. Five days after Strzok was reported as having been signed on to your team: Tuesday, 18 July 2017

DOJ/FBI have FISA surveillance request renewed (renewal #3)

twitter.com/TheLastRefuge2/status/959891090806640642 Have you stipulated that Lisa Page, having returned to the FBI in “mid-July,” was already back working at the FBI when this occurred? Or was she still on the Mueller team? Then these events took place: Thursday, 20 July 2017

DOJ Inspector General receives compromising texts of Mueller investigator Peter Strzok from FBI

dailycaller.com/2017/12/13/new-details-emerge-about-discovery-of-fbi-agents-anti-trump-texts/ Have you stipulated, using the “mid-July” language, that Lisa Page was already back at the FBI when the Inspector General received the texts compromising her and Strzok—only one week, exactly, after you had taken Strzok onto your team? 27 July 2017

DOJ Inspector General meets with Special Counsel Robert Mueller and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein to inform them of the Strzok-Page texts. “Immediately upon learning of the allegations, the Special Counsel’s Office removed Peter Strzok from the investigation,” said Peter Carr.

dailycaller.com/2017/12/13/new-details-emerge-about-discovery-of-fbi-agents-anti-trump-texts/

www.cnn.com/2017/12/02/politics/fbi-agent-removed-trump-investigation/index.html I’m very sorry that in my initial query to you I somehow failed to make clear the exact information I was asking you to supply–although I genuinely tried in all good faith. I do hope that this brief snippet of time-line from our research and investigation has helped to clarify exactly what we are attempting to determine. Therefore—again in all good faith—I ask again: Please supply the EXACT DATE—day of the month, name of the month, and year—on which Lisa Page “returned to the FBI” from the Mueller team. I will be very grateful for your help and candor in this matter. David Reznor

And we waited. And we waited more. And we continued to wait. And nothing came back from Peter Carr. Crickets. Swamp crickets.

OUR SENIOR EDITOR WADES INTO THE SWAMP

This morning, after six days had passed since my initial inquiry to Peter Carr, our senior editor followed up:

Dear Mr. Carr, I am … senior editor for Chalet Books and the Chalet Reports website. It has come to my attention that you have not responded to our research associate, David Reznor, on the questions he has asked you about the date on which Lisa Page returned to the FBI from the Special Counsel’s team. Both Mr. Reznor and I are under considerable deadline pressures, and I cannot understand why you have evaded this simple question, but it has now been six days, and your nonresponse is working to our detriment. Inarguably, the fact of the return of Ms. Page to the FBI from the SC team is not classified or confidential, as you already have stipulated to that fact publicly. Given that a date is not the proprietary property of any entity, public or private, it is impossible that you could withhold the date of her return on any valid grounds of confidentiality. Therefore I beseech you to timely answer the question, as quickly as possible at this point. I am going to summate the clear and specific questions that Mr. Reznor has submitted to you (original traffic included below). 1. On what specific DATE did Lisa Page leave the Mueller Special Counsel team and return to the FBI (month, day of the month, and year)? [NOTE: Answering this simple question will obviate need for attention to the further questions.] 2. Given your public statements that Lisa Page left the Special Counsel team in “mid-July” 2017, and that she left “weeks” before the 27 July 2017 briefing of Robert Mueller concerning the Strzok-Page texts, do you stipulate that Lisa Page left the SC team on 13 July 2017–the same date that Peter Strzok was added to the SC team? 3. If you do not so stipulate as in 2. above, then did Lisa Page leave the SC team and return to the FBI before, or after, 13 July 2017, and on what specific date? Your earliest possible attention and answers are urgently requested. Best regards, [Name] Senior Editor

Chalet Books & Multimedia

It didn’t take him long to slam the door:

Thank you for the email. We will continue to decline to comment beyond the information I previously provided to Mr. Reznor Best,

Peter

MUELLER MOUTHPIECE MUZZLED

It’s difficult to come to any other conclusion than that Robert Mueller has expressly ordered Peter Carr to obfuscate the date on which Lisa Page returned to the FBI from the Mueller team. And if that is the case, there is something about it that Robert Mueller wants hidden.

Did Lisa Page in fact return to the FBI from the Mueller team on the very day that Peter Strzok was brought over to the Mueller team from the FBI: Thursday, 13 July 2017? It certainly looks like a very likely possibility.

Even if not, for the date to be even in the ballpark of “mid-July,” it only could have been within a very few days either side of Strzok’s arrival on the Mueller team.

Yet the claim is that Mueller didn’t find out about the Strzok-Page texts until two weeks later: on Thursday, 27 July 2017. Then why would Strzok and Page be essentially switching places between Mueller and the FBI on or about the very same day in “mid-July”—only for Strzok to be removed two weeks later? What did Mueller actually know about Strzok and Page, and when did he know it?

Something stinks like a swamp bottom.

We urge everyone reading this to contact Peter Carr directly and asked him why Mueller has muzzled him on this point. Here is his email address:

SpecialCounselPress@usdoj.gov

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We’d like to extend our everlasting gratitude to Sundance at The Last Refuge/a.k.a. The Conservative Treehouse for his tireless and uniquely insightful analysis of this Mueller-Strzok-Page-McCabe-Rosenstein-Comey-Clinton mess. If you haven’t read him, you owe it to yourself to catch up on everything he’s written—and check in daily.

Thanks also to Doug Ross for his extraordinary online database in timeline spreadsheet form, “A TIMELINE OF TREASON: How the DNC and FBI Leadership Tried to Fix a Presidential Election.”

It is impossible to overstate the value, and downright necessity, of a timeline for analysis of critical events—the more exact the better. The Deep State denizens specialize in twisting and obfuscating and lying about the dates and times of events. Beat them at their own game. Find out the explosive revelations in Ashton Gray’s revolutionary 600-page CIA exposé, Watergate: The Hoax. It contains hundreds of cited references to government and personal documents, many of which have never been published before. It finally exposes the dirty truth behind Watergate that has confounded and dumfounded every investigation, book, report, and trier of fact that has gone before—and it is even dirtier than anyone ever guessed. The exact same kinds of tactics and methods are being used by the CIA and FBI, right now, today. Buy and read Watergate: The Hoax today, and recommend it to everyone you know, love, and care about!

Watergate: The Hoax is available now

at Amazon, iBooks and Barnes & Noble.

Order it today!

Rewrite history with the truth!

And be among the first to buy and own Ashton Gray’s revolutionary work Created Equal: The Greatest Lie, a merciless assault on 300 years of fatuously false philosophy, psychology, sociology, and politics! Order now for only $4.99 at Amazon.com.

Available as Kindle and trade paperback; also available at other fine book retailers.

Join the new cultural revolution! Buy and read Created Equal: The Greatest Lie!