Now, before anyone starts complaining about Faux News and its coverage of Wednesday’s impeachment hearing, keep in mind that Judge Andrew Napolitano was a guest on Neil Cavuto’s show, and he seemed to think that the Democrats scored big with Wednesday’s questioning:

Napolitano: "I think the Democrats established conclusively that the aid was held up in return for a political favor … The president was more concerned with Biden than he was with helping an ally fighting a bloody war with Russia" pic.twitter.com/seeFGHWLFP — Lis Power (@LisPower1) November 13, 2019

However, anchor Bret Baier later talked to former independent counsel Ken Starr from the Clinton impeachment, and Starr opined that the Democrats didn’t manage to prove any crime was committed, and furthermore, the chances of the Senate removing Trump from office are nonexistent — Wednesday’s testimony certainly wasn’t going to flip any of them.

Ken Starr: “no hope for impeachment” and “no crime was proven today” pic.twitter.com/xfVORRGbRJ — Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) November 13, 2019

We the people agree!! — Ann Bard (@AnnBard1) November 13, 2019

Not what the Democrats and Trump haters want to hear. — Alexander Padilla (@Alexpad) November 13, 2019

@SpeakerPelosi lost the House majority today. Thanks Madame Speaker! — Madison_Con (@Madison_con) November 13, 2019

This is really bad for the Dems. It warms my heart! — Trumpchick ??❤️? (@1986rockchalk) November 13, 2019

They have nothing. Their “evidence” is locker room hearsay about who the star quarterback is asking to the prom. It’s ridiculous. — MAGAbyMILLIONS (@BobbiMaga22) November 13, 2019

No Crimes Committed — Are You Not Entertained? (@SheriHerman10) November 13, 2019

Most important analysis of the day! — ?Deplorable ER RN (@DeplorableEr) November 13, 2019

KEN KNOWS – GAME OVER NANCY — Rick Lucky (@LoccheadRick) November 13, 2019

Who knows … Nancy Pelosi might even pull the plug on this thing at the end of the week if the Democrats can’t come up with some better soundbites.

Concerns, Opinions, What if's and Maybe he meant this is not evidence. You have Ukraine's own President saying he was not pressured. Case closed! Voters should know if former VP Biden and his son broke the law. More so if that former VP is running for POTUS. — Anthony (@Robust346) November 13, 2019

See the problem with Ken Starr’s statement is that he is applying logic. Dems have decided to impeach President Trump no matter the outcome. They will vote and it will pass the house. — Michael (@mdsennett) November 13, 2019

I think they've decided to pretend to impeach President Trump, but I seriously doubt there will be a House vote, at least not one that passes. They're hoping if they "investigate" forever, they might fool enough gullible voters into thinking there's something there. — mrxak (@mrxak) November 13, 2019

It wasn't even that! @RepAdamSchiff got destroyed today! — Tonya still @watchingfoxes (@tonya_still) November 13, 2019

Ahhh, but a crime was proven! Adam Schiff keeps lying on camera, and eventually will be found guilty of treason against his country, for being heavily involved in attempting to stage a coup against his President! — Digger (@digger_geensen) November 13, 2019

there never was hope for impeachment against Trump…but high hopes for impeachment of schiff …and a few others — mmjmd.net (@frankjames) November 13, 2019

Lol, President Trump is actually looking for who really interfered in our elections 2016 and they have turned it around to suggest that it’s President Trump looking to interfere with the 2020 election. What a joke! — Fabian Carrazana ?? (@SSGCarrazana) November 13, 2019

Not that they’d take our advice, but the Democrats would be a whole lot better off (and Pelosi likely agrees) if they focused on the 2020 election.

Related: