The head of the House Judiciary Committee subpoenaed the Department of Justice (DOJ) on Thursday to obtain documents related to how the FBI handled its probe into Hillary Clinton Hillary Diane Rodham ClintonJoe Biden looks to expand election battleground into Trump country Biden leads Trump by 12 points among Catholic voters: poll The Hill's Campaign Report: Biden goes on offense MORE’s email server, potential surveillance abuses and the recent decision to fire a top FBI official.

Chairman Bob Goodlatte Robert (Bob) William GoodlatteNo documents? Hoping for legalization? Be wary of Joe Biden Press: Trump's final presidential pardon: himself USCIS chief Cuccinelli blames Paul Ryan for immigration inaction MORE (R-Va.), who is leading a joint investigation with Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy Harold (Trey) Watson GowdySunday shows preview: Election integrity dominates as Nov. 3 nears Tim Scott invokes Breonna Taylor, George Floyd in Trump convention speech Sunday shows preview: Republicans gear up for national convention, USPS debate continues in Washington MORE (R-S.C.), issued the subpoena after conservatives on his panel became increasingly frustrated with what they said was the administration's unacceptably slow move to turn over documents.

The lawmakers say they have only received about 3,000 out of the roughly 1.2 million documents they are seeking, despite repeated letters requesting them to be handed over to the committee.

ADVERTISEMENT

"To date, the Department has only produced a fraction of the documents that have been requested," Goodlatte wrote in a letter to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein Rod RosensteinDOJ kept investigators from completing probe of Trump ties to Russia: report Five takeaways from final Senate Intel Russia report FBI officials hid copies of Russia probe documents fearing Trump interference: book MORE on Thursday. "Given the Department’s ongoing delays in producing these documents, I am left with no choice but to issue the enclosed subpoena to compel production of these documents."

DOJ spokesman Ian Prior said in a statement that officials are carefully combing through the documents page-by-page to protect certain sensitive information. He also pushed back on the breadth of the document request, saying the DOJ believes there are 30,000 documents relevant to the committee's inquiry and describing the 1.2 million document request as "substantial."

"We are individually reviewing the remaining documents to ensure that they do not include grand jury information, information about ongoing law enforcement actions involving American citizens, or privileged attorney-client communications," Prior said. "In cases where redactions have been necessary, the Department has, when appropriate, provided Committee staff an opportunity for in-camera review of unredacted materials."

"Since January, more than two dozen FBI staff have been assisting the Department in producing, on a rolling basis, responsive documents to the Committee’s broad request every 10 to 14 days," he said, adding that the DOJ and FBI take the committee's inquiry seriously.

Prior confirmed that the committee has received 3,000 records so far.

Goodlatte told The Hill that the Judiciary Committee would subpoena for FBI documents relating to the conduct of former FBI Director James Comey James Brien ComeyDemocrats fear Russia interference could spoil bid to retake Senate Book: FBI sex crimes investigator helped trigger October 2016 public probe of Clinton emails Trump jabs at FBI director over testimony on Russia, antifa MORE and his former deputy, Andrew McCabe Andrew George McCabeGraham: Comey to testify about FBI's Russia probe, Mueller declined invitation Barr criticizes DOJ in speech declaring all agency power 'is invested in the attorney general' GOP votes to authorize subpoenas, depositions in Obama-era probe MORE. Both officials oversaw the Clinton probe as well as the early stages of the probe into the Trump campaign's ties to Russia.

The Judiciary chairman said statements McCabe made after being fired by Attorney General Jeff Sessions Jefferson (Jeff) Beauregard SessionsGOP set to release controversial Biden report Trump's policies on refugees are as simple as ABCs Ocasio-Cortez, Velázquez call for convention to decide Puerto Rico status MORE last week have raised questions about Comey's prior testimony to Congress when he denied having authorized leaking information to the press about then-candidates Trump or Clinton while leading the FBI.

DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz has separately been examining the FBI and DOJ’s actions in the Clinton probe and is expected to release a report on his findings this spring. A portion of that review involving McCabe was cited by Sessions when he fired the FBI official last Friday, just two days before McCabe's scheduled retirement.

McCabe has denied any wrongdoing and has claimed his firing was part of an effort to undermine special counsel Robert Mueller Robert (Bob) MuellerCNN's Toobin warns McCabe is in 'perilous condition' with emboldened Trump CNN anchor rips Trump over Stone while evoking Clinton-Lynch tarmac meeting The Hill's 12:30 Report: New Hampshire fallout MORE's investigation, of which he is a possible witness. McCabe said he was within his authority to disclose information to the media and claimed he was being "singled out" because of his ties to the former FBI director fired by Trump.

Goodlatte and Gowdy earlier this month called for a second special counsel to investigate the FBI's handling of the Clinton probe, something that Sessions and DOJ officials have resisted, pointing to the current inspector general investigation.

The Judiciary chairman has also pushed for information surrounding conservative allegations of Foreign intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) abuse relating to information used in warrants to monitor a former Trump campaign adviser as part of the Russia probe.

While Goodlatte had signaled he would issue a subpoena to obtain the FBI documents, he faced criticism from Rep. Jerrold Nadler (N.Y), the top Democrat on the Judiciary panel, for unilaterally issuing the subpoena on Thursday.

Nadler accused Goodlatte of working to divert attention from the "chaos" surrounding President Trump Donald John TrumpBubba Wallace to be driver of Michael Jordan, Denny Hamlin NASCAR team Graham: GOP will confirm Trump's Supreme Court nominee before the election Southwest Airlines, unions call for six-month extension of government aid MORE's administration.

“Instead of using our time and resources to conduct oversight on pressing matters that actually impact our country today — like the Russian government’s ongoing attack on our elections or President Trump’s crusade to undermine the independence of the Department of Justice — Judiciary Republicans have chosen to issue a unilateral subpoena to acquire information related to Hillary Clinton’s emails," Nadler said in a statement, calling their priorities "upside-down."

“The Department of Justice has largely complied with that request, transmitting new documents to the Committee every two weeks since late last year. It seems that this subpoena is intended to speed up that production to pivot the discussion back to Hillary Clinton and divert attention from the chaos surrounding the Trump Administration and allegations involving the Trump campaign," he said.

The subpoena comes shortly before House lawmakers are set to depart Capitol Hill for a two-week Easter recess. The DOJ will have two weeks to produce the documents with the deadline being set to April 5 at noon, which lands shortly before the House reconvenes.

Goodlatte faced increasing pressure from conservatives on his committee who were eager to charge forward into the investigation. Some GOP lawmakers began to direct their frustration at the chairman after lawmakers heard from just two FBI officials out of roughly 20 they wanted to interview.

Goodlatte first floated the possibility of a subpoena on Sunday, although lawmakers privately buzzed about a possible order earlier this month.

Some members, before it was officially issued Thursday, characterized the subpoena as a last resort to compel the DOJ to cooperate.

“I would hope that we wouldn’t have to compel them to comply, but more and more evidence would suggest that compelling them to deliver documents may be our only recourse,” Rep. Mark Meadows Mark Randall MeadowsSouthwest Airlines, unions call for six-month extension of government aid Airline CEOs plead with Washington as layoffs loom Trump reacts to Ginsburg's death: 'An amazing woman who led an amazing life' MORE (R-N.C.), the head of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, told The Hill on Monday.

Updated at 8:05 p.m.