After years of being in the crosshairs of many Conservatives, the CBC faces some unprecedented challenges. An internal memo from the CBC’s president spoke of “dark clouds” facing the corporation. Its ardently antagonistic rivals at Sun News recently published an Abacus poll noting that the Canadians are “ready” to sell the CBC. This result is very inconsistent with other polling on the CBC — although it is very consistent with the policy preferences of the sparsely viewed Sun Network.

Whether one sees the cloudy future of the CBC as a source of deep angst or schadenfreude depends very much on one’s position on the partisan spectrum. What is clear, however, is that most Canadians agree on the source of this recent trouble for the CBC — the blockbuster deal between the NHL and Rogers. Let’s have a quick look at how the public saw that deal.

We asked Canadians about Rogers Communications Inc.’s $5.2 billion broadcast deal that effectively gives them exclusive rights to all NHL games for the next 12 years. In short, Canadians are most decidedly opposed to the deal and they foresee dire consequences for the future of the CBC.

If there’s one thing that Canadians follow with near-fanatical devotion, it’s not the economy and it’s certainly not politics — it’s hockey. An astonishing 79 per cent of the Canadians we surveyed had heard of the Rogers-NHL deal. By comparison, just 67 per cent were aware that Stephen Harper had prorogued Parliament in 2010 and 66 per cent had heard that Canada was projected to run a budget deficit that same year.

[start_gallery]Click to enlarge [end_gallery]

Those who are aware of the deal don’t particularly care for it — these respondents oppose the deal by a wide margin (49 per cent to 28 per cent). Regionally, Albertans and Quebeckers are somewhat more open to the deal, but the only place where this agreement receives plurality support is among the ranks of the Conservative Party (where 46 per cent support the deal). Once again, we see the constituency for the Conservative party in a fairly different place than the rest of the political spectrum. We don’t think this is driven by deep affection for Rogers and recall the Conservative government is championing easing some of the oligopolistic practices of Rogers and other carriers, presumably to the applause of their constituents (so much for the whole invisible hand thing).

[start_gallery]Click to enlarge [end_gallery]

So why are Canadians so averse to the deal? Well, there is some uncertainty as to how this deal will affect the various players, but from coast to coast, Canadians of all political stripes seem to agree on one thing — it is bad news for the CBC. Six in ten (63 per cent) say the deal will place the future of Canada’s public broadcaster in jeopardy, compared to just one in seven (14 per cent) who feel these concerns are wildly exaggerated. Once again, however, “bad” for the CBC is a relative thing.

Furthermore, of those who expressed an opinion one way or the other, Canadians lean heavily towards the belief that the Rogers deal will negatively affect hockey fans and, somewhat more broadly, Canadians in general. Indeed, the only perceived winner in this deal (aside from Rogers, that is) is the NHL itself (38 per cent foresee a positive impact on the NHL, compared to just 21 per cent who predict a positive outcome for hockey fans and 16 per cent who think Canadians in general will be better off).

[start_gallery]Click to enlarge [end_gallery]

Let’s return to the question of the future of the CBC. Clearly, everyone agrees that the Rogers deal is a financial dagger to the heart of the CBC. As the leaked memo noted, the profound loss of revenue from the NHL Rogers deal will shake the very foundations and viability of the CBC. With this point of consensus aside, let’s see if this is seen as a good or bad thing and what — if anything — the public sees as a response to these challenges.

[start_gallery]Click to enlarge [end_gallery]

According to Sun News, Canadians are “ready” to sell the CBC. Our recent poll, however, comes up with a profoundly different result. It doesn’t ask whether the CBC should be sold but it does explain to respondents where the current levels of public stand it asks whether the public leans toward cutting, maintaining or expanding public funding for the CBC.

In spite of (or perhaps because of) the demise of CBC’s Hockey Night in Canada as we know it, a plurality of Canadians (38 per cent) want to see the CBC’s funding increased, while one-third want its funding levels to remain steady (31 per cent). Only a little over a quarter of respondents want to either cut or eliminate the CBC’s funding. It seems difficult to reconcile the dramatic claim that Canadians “favour privatizing the CBC” with our finding that around two-thirds want its funding increased or preserved.

[start_gallery]Click to enlarge [end_gallery]

Notably, views of the CBC are largely split along party lines. There certainly are members of the public who would favour eliminating the CBC but they are a very small minority and they are largely supporters of the Conservative party. Outside of the Conservative party, roughly half of Canadians want more public funding for the corporation. Conservative supporters, however, don’t share these warm feelings for the CBC, with the plurality of these respondents (35 per cent) calling for the broadcaster’s public funding to be scrapped completely. These results may at least partially explain Conservative supporters’ aforementioned support for the Rogers-NHL deal, given the resulting financial blow to the CBC.

So how can both poll results be right? In short, they can’t. The Abacus poll isn’t readily available and we can’t find the wording or sequencing. It does appear that the question came from a poll with a lot of questions on the economy and fiscal issues. Perhaps selling the CBC is more acceptable in this context. We also wonder if the results may be influenced by the use of an opt-in panel which doesn’t cover those who are unwilling or unable to do surveys online. Even the online portion of respondents are opt-in participants; the American Association of Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) and the Marketing Research Intelligence Association (MRIA) have noted that such surveys are not scientifically accurate representations of the general population.

Abacus is a reputable organization that acknowledges these points in their release and they did not author the headline. In the absence of other evidence, we suggest that the notion that ‘Canadians are ready to sell the CBC’ headline is not an accurate reflection of real public opinion. While Conservative supporters may be more receptive to such a drastic measure, the vast majority of the public wants to maintain the CBC and leans toward augmenting its funding base.

In summary, Canadians are worried about the Rogers-NHL deal and the consequences for hockey fans and the CBC. For the next few years, Rogers will carry the burden of proving to Canadians that it can preserve (and perhaps improve upon) the hockey experience, as hockey fans aren’t likely to tolerate the degradation of their most beloved pastime. Indeed, when it comes to hockey, Canadians have been known to set cities ablaze for less.

Frank Graves is the founder and president of EKOS Research Associates, Ltd.

The views, opinions and positions expressed by all iPolitics columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of iPolitics.

This study was conducted using EKOS’ unique, hybrid online/telephone research panel, Probit. Our panel offers exhaustive coverage of the Canadian population (i.e., Internet, phone, cell phone), random recruitment (in other words, participants are recruited randomly, they do not opt themselves into our panel), and equal probability sampling. All respondents to our panel are recruited by telephone using random digit dialling and are confirmed by live interviewers. Unlike opt-in online panels, Probit supports margin of error estimates. We believe this to be the only probability-based online panel in Canada.

The field dates for this survey are December 12-20, 2013. In total, 1,531 Canadians aged 18 and over responded to the survey. Of these cases, 1,427 were collected online, while 104 were collected by computer assisted telephone interviews (CATI). The margin of error associated with the total sample is +/-2.5 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.

Please note that the margin of error increases when the results are sub-divided (i.e., error margins for sub-groups such as region, sex, age, education). All the data have been statistically weighted to ensure the sample’s composition reflects that of the actual population of Canada according to Census data.