By Walid Shoebat

Bring up “Trump-Putin” relations in the debates next Monday and Trump should bring up Hillary’s three secret ‘love affairs’ with major Muslim Brotherhood operatives while he makes the case for his complement of Putin. This will be long (7000 words), detailed and loaded with documents, translated links, packed with evidence on Hillary’s affairs with Muslim Brotherhood operatives who intend to destroy us from within. It must be circulated and carefully studied.

But before we disclose all the juicy details, there is no question, the issue of Donald Trump complementing Russia’s President Putin will come up during the debate. If I was Trump I will remind Hillary Clinton once compared Putin with Hitler. Lets compare and see who better qualifies to win the ‘Hitler award’. Hillary is one who does not mind putting evil Hitler to good use, so long it advances another evil: Hillary.

Trump complemented Putin, sure, but should her photo here be misconstrued as “Hillary meeting with Hitler”? Had Jesus been here, in our times, a photo of His temptation will definitely be misconstrued as “God’s secret pact with the devil”. Even God’s testing of Job via Lucifer will be considered history’s great conspiracy. History always gets twisted by politicians and slanderers. But it is only History that will eventually set the record straight regarding the truth.

Trump can easily flip the table showing she is guilty of the very thing she accuses Putin of. But first, he must ask, shouldn’t it be prudent and wise for a U.S. Presidential candidate to deal with and address the wide variety of passé mass culture clichés and stereotypes that were developed during the Cold War about Russians? Would we dare say all what we say about Putin what is said about the Jewish people? Carl Marx and Lenin were Jews, Communism therefore should be a Jewish conspiracy?

Is hating Russia the other only accepted prejudice after hating Catholics? When it came to hating Catholics, even John McCain had to denounce anti-Catholic pastor John Hagee who endorsed McCain during his failed presidential race.

Yet so many of these American politicians, like Hillary Clinton, including many others even in the Republican Party do the same to Russians as Hagee did with Catholics. When it comes to Putin they paint him as the most evil dictator of our times while forgetting that the U.S. protects and defends evil allies that Putin pales in comparison to when it comes to their tyrannical rulers.

Saudi Arabia, the mother of all Wahhabi terrorism, is still officially an ally of the U.S. America even invaded Iraq to protect Saudi Arabia and now we have the Middle East implode as result. It was Mr. Dmitry Peskov, the press spokesman for the Russian President, lambasted the Saudi regime for sowing terrorism and backing al-Qaeda inspired guerrillas even now throughout the crisis-hit Syria. President Putin, when it came to Saudi Arabia, made his threat clear: ” …Russia will defeat Saudis in Syria which became the epicenter of their [Saudis] malevolent plots. It is imperative for all Syrian parties that believe in a peaceful resolution for their country’s five-year civil war to sit down at the negotiation table and denounce the Saudi destructive role,” said President Putin. Did Hillary say the same? No.

Putin even added that Russia will bomb Saudi Arabia back to the Stone Age life when nomad Arabs were in the habit of living in tents unless the regime gives up assisting radical terrorists in the Middle-East.

We have gone wild off the rails regarding the Russian leader, blaming anything and everything on Vladimir Putin just as we did Saddam Hussein, Gaddafi, Egypt’s Mubarak and now Bashar Al-Assad of Syria.

The Communist Soviet Empire collapsed without a shot, spawning a much better Russia, while Hillary compared Putin to Hitler painting Russia as a country dying to attack Western Europe.

I would ask: Hillary, why are you turning your back on the very people who mounted the greatest bloodless revolution in history to remove the Communist Soviet regime? Is Russia’s democracy less advanced than Saudi Arabia, which we defend, while NATO expansion into Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic and NATO’s Turkey expansion into Syria and Iraq should be acceptable to you?

It should not be difficult to put Hillary in checkmate.

Isn’t it time to rid the U.S. from the mad policies of Bill Clinton, Joe Lieberman, William Cohen, Madeleine Albright, Sandy Berger and Trent Lott?

Was it not Putin who was the first world leader to telephone US President George W. Bush after 911? And now that we know the folly of meddling in the Middle East we are still on the same course of destruction?

Obama and Hillary’s policies caused the death of a quarter million human beings and the displacement of millions more who flooded Europe and now you want to bring these into our nation? Did Putin do this in Crimea? Who is best to win the Hitler Award?

Hillary is still honing after Syria’s President Bashar al-Assad for purportedly crossing Obama’s whimsical “red line” claiming he used chemical weapons. This is an assertion that was never proven. Where is your proof Hillary? Was it not Russia that launched a formidable aerial attack against ISIS positions in Syria?

We speak of the lack of democracy in Russia. But do we really have a democracy when majority Americans opposed genetically modified foods? Do we have a democracy when most Americans opposed same-sex marriage? Russia stood behind marriage and became a leading global supplier of healthy, organic and high-quality food and its ‘anti-gay’ legislation is in fact ‘pro-children’ and pro-marriage legislation. Yet you run ads about how much you care about children? Liar.

And what does Hillary do? She accused, slandered and frothed saying that we, the American people, for not supporting such agendas are homophobic and more:

“You can put half of Trump supporters into what I call the ‘basket of deplorables.’ Right? They’re racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic, you name it.… Now some of those folks, they are irredeemable, but thankfully they are not American.”

Perhaps its time to re-open a can of worms for the Clintons that is least addressed. Trump can have the media do summersaults the day after if Trump addresses what the media failed to address before. And if history already recorded the disaster of Iraq, it will also record the disaster of Syria, especially when we dig deeper into Hillary’s role to advance the Muslim Brotherhood, which is now infecting Syria in a gigantic way. Syria is the second hub for the Muslim Brotherhood after Egypt, which your administration nearly destroyed as well and now Trump meets Al-Sissi to fix what you messed up.

When it comes to the Clintons, they remind me of the prophetic movie, the Siege. Densel Washington as Trump. I would be Tony Shalhoub in his role as the FBI Special Agent Frank Haddad. Hillary as the CIA officer Elise Kraft / Sharon Bridger. Trump should ask Hillary: at least we know who your husband’s sexual partners were, but as for you, Hillary, the lights were so dim, how could you possibly know who you were screwing with?

Have the New York Times a day after the debate even try to refute the secret ‘love affairs’ between Hillary and the Muslim Brotherhood.

HILLARY’S FIRST M.B SECRET LOVER

Shoebat.com has produced evidence that reveal Hillary Clinton, while she was Secretary of State, had conspired to snuff out criticism of Islam. We collected numerous photos and meetings that were leaked from inside sources of one named Bassam Estwani. This would be the first ‘Samir’ in The Siege movie. An Imam of a mosque, where Anwar Al-Awalki used to speak, Estwani as it turned out, is one secret Muslim Brotherhood figure that had access to the Clinton White House.

There was leaked exchange between Hillary’s office regarding Estwani. While his membership in the Muslim Brotherhood can be found on Ikhwanwiki – a Muslim Brotherhood directory – the site has kept all the information on him out of public access.

However, thanks to Arabic sources, Shoebat.com has obtained evidence of an alarming conspiracy – involving Estwani – to spread Islam in the U.S. military. Muhammad Ratib Al-Nablisi, one of the most prominent Muslim Theologians and Hamas supporters in the Levant (Syria) referenced Estwani’s efforts in a 2001 progress report on the spread of Islam in America. In the report, al-Nablisi relayed the contents of his conversation with Estwani (translated):

The first issue now in the world should be Islam. Islamic books are entirely absent in Europe and the U.S. However, I was told by my entrusted friend, Mr. Bassam Estwani two weeks ago. He told me that during the Gulf War they appointed an Islamic supervisor to guide twenty thousand American soldiers and officers in Washington to be a religious mentor for them in the army. But that the news is not good. There are several threats and the interests of Muslims are threatened in the world. But that the advocacy news is quite good. Allah wanted to show his religion. He wanted to push people to know Islam.

Based on research done by Shoebat.com, it’s believed that the man, Estwani, was referring to could be Taha Jaber al-Alwani, a vehement anti-Semite, whom Huma Abedin referred to as key figure in using the Muslim Minority Affairs to invade the U.S. The other is Abdurahman Alamoudi, who founded the American Muslim Armed Forces and Veterans Affairs Council (AMAFVAC). Coincidentally, one of the leaked photos shows Alamoudi with Estwani and U.S. Congressman Jim Moran (D-VA)

As Shoebat.com has reported, Estwani serves on the board of the Syrian Emergency Task Force (SETF) which became a source of controversy last year when its Research Director – Elizabeth O’Bagy – was found to have a serious conflict of interest. Subsequently, as Shoebat.com reported, SETF didn’t handle the spotlight all that well. In addition to being funded by the U.S. State Department, the SETF also backed an anti-Semitic imam named Sheikh Ahmed Moaz al-Khatib to lead the Syrian rebels politically.

The name of Estwani’s mosque is significant because the term “Dar al-Hijrah” represents one of two spheres in the Islamic world. It refers to a place designated for immigrants to Islam. The other sphere is “Dar al-Harab” which refers to a place where people are at war with Islam.

In 2004, Al-Jazeera quoted Estwani as saying the following:

“Dar Al-Hijra Center in Washington has played a prominent role and was remarkable to educate patrons on the importance and the need to participate in the elections for the selection of the fittest and the closest to the needs and values of the Muslim community … The center of Dar al-Hijrah has good relations with some in Congress, whether Republicans or Democrats , and I have repeated visits to the center on several occasions , which was visited by the Republican candidate Tom Davis and he addressed the Muslim audience after Friday prayers that preceded the elections for the House of Representatives.”

Clearly, the efforts of Estwani included endearing himself to both Republicans and Democrats. Here he is flanked by Republican Congressman Tom Davis he mentioned above and Democrat Moran:

… To ensure the entry of Arab and Islamic figures and institutions in the U.S. decision making process in the U.S. Congress … The establishment of the “Muslim lobby” through pressure groups which would have an impact on the U.S. presidential election and foreign policy orientations.

In another shocking revelation, Estwani was quoted in an article published by Da’wa.net in which the topic was the rise in demand for pro-Islamic books in the U.S. after 9/11:

One such case is the rise in demand for Islamic books in non-Muslim countries as result of 9/11. This alone is a big win that is clear to the people of Allah. Professor Bassam Estwani, owner of Dar Al-Quran and other publishing houses said that, “Hundreds of Islamic books were re-printed to meet the huge demand of Westerners to read these books…”

If you’ve ever found yourself scratching your head at the disinterest of Republicans when it comes to the Muslim Brotherhood, consider that Estwani also met with the most powerful member of the House of Representatives at the time – Speaker Dennis Hastert. Hastert’s successor John Boehner has shown a propensity for either ignoring or helping the Brotherhood. He vehemently defended Abedin in the face of overwhelming evidence she’s connected to the Muslim Brotherhood. Senator Marco Rubio and Rep. Mike Rogers did as well. Boehner has also avoided appointing a select committee to look into Benghazi. John McCain’s passionate defense of the SETF and O’Bagy is another glaring example.

And of course, who can forget Congress’s Gaza Queen Cynthia McKinney:

Bassam Estwani was the Chairman of the Dar al-Hijrah mosque when then President Bill Clinton wrote him a personal note, as Shoebat.com previously reported. In that note, Clinton told Estwani that “all suggestions” Estwani had given to him – presumably in a letter Estwani presented to Clinton on March 9, 2000 – were ones that Clinton was “interested in” and that the President wanted to “follow-up”.

At the beginning of the note, Clinton appears to be telling Estwani to check back with Mary Beth Cahill and Ben Johnson, two Clinton aids at the time. In subsequent days, in an email from Maureen T. Shea to Cahill and Johnson, Shea opens by explaining why she was writing:

This places Estwani at no fewer than two events with President Clinton. The One America event at the White House Shea was referring to was for religious leaders.

After providing the three suggestions from Estwani that Clinton was “interested in”, Shea asks if the suggestions will work. One suggestion was to combine all three religious events at the White House in December (deceitful practice of Muslim bridge-building). The second had to do with getting Clinton to visit the Dar al-Hijrah mosque. The third involved a one-on-one meeting between Estwani and Clinton, which Clinton said was “ok to do”.

In another email by Shea a couple of weeks later, she gives a subordinate the parameters for a letter to Estwani in response to the suggestions he presented to Clinton:

The verdict was in. Shea thought it a bad idea for Clinton to go to Dar al-Hijrah and a bad idea for a one-on-one meeting. This suggests that the hateful nature of the mosque – which would be home to Anwar al-Awlaki and visited by multiple 9/11 hijackers – was well known by the White House. That level of knowledge is not surprising. What is shocking is that Estwani would have as much access as he did. After all, the imam for Dar al-Hijrah from 1995-1999 was Mohammed al-Hanooti. In 1995, al-Hanooti had been named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.

That’s right, the Chairman of the Dar al-Hijrah mosque, which was home to an individual implicated in the first World Trade Center attack, had access to President Clinton. That WTC attack occurred on Clinton’s watch. Another such co-conspirator is Siraj Wahhaj, who invited convicted terrorist Sheikh Omar Abdul Rahman (Blind Sheikh) to speak at his mosque several times. As Shoebat.com has reported, Wahhaj’s links to that attack continue to strengthen. Estwani has proudly posted a photo of him with Wahhaj (we don’t ever recall seeing Wahhaj so happy):

So why was Hillary so involved with Muslim Brotherhood operatives? Hillary was steeped in the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) which had been pushing for criminalizing criticism of Islam for years, as far back as 1999. However, the objective of the OIC – to make illegal “defamation of religions” – needed a moderation makeover, which led to the “Istanbul Process”, kicked off officially in the city of its namesake, little more than one year prior to the Benghazi attacks. The agenda was intended to give a facelift to UN Resolution 16/18, which was adopted earlier that year by the Human Rights Council.

Hillary Clinton attended and Co-chaired this event with then Secretary General of the OIC – Ekmeleddin İhsanoğlu – and Foreign Minister Davutoğlu – on July 15, 2011, exactly five years to the day when Erdogan’s Islamist major coup sparked in Istanbul, after defeating a minor coup.

HILLARY’S SECOND M.B SECRET LOVER

The Clinton’s nefarious dealings of close Mursi advisor Essam el-Haddad and his son (another Samir from the Siege) Gehad el-Haddad. Both were leaders in Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood apparatus and worked very closely together. Prior to working for the Mursi regime, Gehad worked for the Clinton Foundation for five years.

The working relationship between Gehad and his father was close as well. Both men were politically active and were later arrested in their capacities as Muslim Brotherhood leaders.

The Egyptian intelligence documents implicate the elder Haddad in dealings with the Sudanese branch of the Islamic Da’wa Organization (IDO), the same IDO that the President’s brother Malik Obama has been linked to. And if these were sufficient in the Egyptian court, shouldn’t they be sufficient to expose Hillary’s connect to the Haddads?

The evidence demonstrated that these Clinton sidekicks were Muslim Brotherhood agents engaged in shoddy and nefarious activities. The Washington Post can review all 42 pages from the Egyptian central intelligence docket, rife with references to Hillary’s aids, Essam and Gehad el-Haddad, as well as several American officials and dignitaries working their way through unofficial backdoor channels, using bribery through Khairat Al-Shater, who was not even, and never became, an Egyptian government official. For example, this document talks of a request from the U.S. Embassy for then Ambassador to Egypt Anne Patterson to meet with Gehad el-Haddad and Khairat el-Shater:

As for the complaint against Mursi’s wife Naglaa Mahmoud, it alleges that she collaborated with Hillary Clinton and planned to help lead domestic insurrections in Egypt after her husband was removed from power. Notwithstanding the validity of the complaint, what cannot be denied is that Saleha Abedin, the mother of Hillary’s very close adviser Huma Abedin, is a close colleague of Naglaa. Together, both women constitute two of the 63 Muslim Sisterhood leaders first revealed by Shoebat.com.

Shoebat.com reported on additional evidence introduced into Egyptian courts. One had to do with the dealings of Rep. David Dreier (R-CA) and the other surrounding a $750 million deal between Blumberg Grain and the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.

Both involved dealings with Gehad el-Haddad. What U.S. officials didn’t realize is that Egyptian authorities carried out espionage missions against the Muslim Brotherhood to build a case against Mohammed Mursi. This involved major money laundering, bribery and illegal dealings regarding lucrative offers to the Muslim Brotherhood on behalf of members of the Obama administration.

El-Shater, a man with whom Blumberg and members of Congress dealt, wasn’t even a government official. Here is a link to the pages of evidence that pertain to this matter.

Translation: Exhibit 2, March 26-27, 2012 from U.S. Embassy requesting to meet el-Shater with team from U.S. Congress, led by Rep. David Dreier to discuss relations between two nations that U.S. admits Muslim Brotherhood the largest organized movement and the most influential in Egypt. To also discuss the Muslim Brotherhood’s vision for Egypt. Essam el-Haddad (Ex 3) coordinating with el-Shater and with emissaries from EU for aid to be sent to Egypt and Int’l Bank. Ex 4, June 5, 2012: Meeting Khairat el-Shater, Essam Haddad, Gehad el-Haddad with EU emissary regarding financial aid to Egypt from EU and World Bank.

Translation: Ex. 9, August 30, 2012: U.S. Embassy requests appt with accused Khairat el-Shater and Hassan Malik with American James Harmon (head of U.S. Projects) to discuss spending $60 Million (envelope B-9).

Ex. 10, U.S. Embassy, September 1, 2012: U.S. Embassy requesting meeting with Khairat el-Shater and Gehad el-Haddad alongside Mike, assistant adviser for U.S. Nat’l Security for International commerce to discuss economic vision for new Egyptian Government.

Translation: Meeting at 1400 hours, dated May 12, 2013 with Khairat el-Shater and Makram Obeid regarding David Blumberg, an American who is a liaison with Muslim Brotherhood leadership, aided by Khairat el-Shater in which the American will secure for the Muslim Brotherhood a project for sea exports (hub) which links to Suez Canal, proposed by Muslim Brotherhood, which secures the interests of foreign nations, particularly, the U.S., Qatar, and Turkey. This hurts Egyptian national security.

Translation: Ex. 28, a letter dated May 3, 2013 entitled, “Blumberg Grain-Egypt” sent by Khairat el-Shater from his email [email protected] sent to Gehad el-Haddad and Ashraf Siri, considered a letter coming from David Blumberg of Blumberg Capital to the accused Izz Nasser via email. The American says he obtained a letter from Ted Deutch. Democratic U.S. Congressman and Republican Mario Ballart. Sent to Egyptian ambassador, telling him that Congress has allocated aid and it is the group that supports $750 Million additional in aid… that el-Shater should consider a consolidated letter from Democrats and Republicans in Congress, not easy to obtain. See link for complete story.

Translation: Accused Jihan Hamza, who’s accused of working inside U.S. Embassy to coordinate communications involving 30-45 minute discussion dated 4/4/13 between el-Shater and the American (Lyle Brenard of U.S. treasury) to discuss aid to Egypt and to get views of el-Shater in that regard. This showed the court the extent of power given to el-Shater, despite his not working in the capacity of any government office, in accordance with traditional methods of dealings within a government during the reign of Mohammed Mursi.

All this Al-Sissi of Egypt knows well and is why he wants a Trump victory. Both Trump and Al-Sissi know that with a Trump victory, at least we can say that 50% of Egyptians will look favorably towards the United States when it is currently 99% hate the U.S.

HILLARY’S THIRD AND FAVORITE M.B SECRET LOVER

When Estwani was visiting the White House, Hillary’s other ‘secret lover’, another female version of ‘Samir’ is none other than #1, Huma Abedin – the daughter of a Muslim Sisterhood leader – had already been working for Hillary Clinton for four years. Shoebat.com revealed that Abedin’s brother was a fellow at the Oxford Center for Islamic Studies (OCIS) for several years when al-Qaradawi, the #1 Muslim Brotherhood spiritual leader, served on the Board.

While we admit, we did not find Huma Abedin’s membership card to the Muslim Brotherhood, her family (father, mother, brother), took us a few months, but wasn’t difficult if you are Shoebat stubborn. Trump should drop Weinergate and focus on Humagate. In government, relationships and family are a crucial part of any vetting. And if Hillary failed to vet Huma, at such a high position, how can she vet Muslim immigrants for that matter? How can she find out whether they want to use pressure cookers for chicken or for some other purpose like cooking Americans instead?





The type of Islamist memberships one finds on Huma’s family is the the same type of memberships one would find in Rafia Sultana Farook’s collections. Rafia was the mother of the San Bernardino terrorist. In the top green line (photo above) is Rafia Farook’s membership of the Muslim Brotherhood; “The Islamic Circle of North America Sisters wing” which sprouted from the radical Pakistani political group called Jamaat-e-Islami created by Abu A’la Maududi, in Pakistan (where Rahami last week’s pressure cooker bomber visited), India and Bangladesh. The goal of this outfit, Jamaat-e-Islami, is to establish an Islamic state worldwide and who also worked closely with Huma and her family (the Abedins) in Saudi Arabia.

The arm of this group is so extensive and operates worldwide. This system of recruiting Muslim women (the sisters) stems from the Muslim Brotherhood’s plan to fulfill its mission for the Sisterhood, which was established as far back as 1933, headed by Lebiba Ahmad and expanded to the Indian subcontinent with Saleha Abedin (Huma’s mother) was also member.

Interestingly, Hillary’s Muslim aid, Huma Abedin, and her parents, were also working with the same radical outfit Jamaat-e-Islami (just as Farook’s mother, Rafia did) under its Prince: Maulana Muhammad Yousuf while living in Saudi Arabia.

To even comprehend how extensive this movement is, read our translated research from reliable Arabic sources and see how far the “sisterhood” movement (which Huma’s mother was member) expanded working with the Abedin family; father Syed Abedin, Brother Hassan Abedin and mother Saleha Mahmoud Abedin. The information in the link is loaded with photocopies of crucial documents, photos, U.N reports and all the links to show how interlinked the Abedins were with the international outfits of the Islamist movement.

And just as Syed Farook’s mother has a membership, so does Hillary’s aid’s mother. Huma Abedin’s mother, Saleha Abedin (I kept a photocopy of her membership before they deleted it after they knew I was on her trail):

How much did Syed Farook’s mother, Rafia Farook know of her son and daughter in law’s planned terrorist plot? The answer would probably be that she knew as much as Saleha Mahmoud Abedin knew of her daughter Huma Abedin whom she worked extensively with.

Syed Farook and Rafia are not far off from where Hillary Clinton’s aid, Huma Abedin was also raised when her parents (the Abedins) went back and forth between the Indian subcontinent and Saudi Arabia.

In Saudi Arabia, Huma’s parents worked with Jamaat-e-Islami, the very terror umbrella that produced Rafia, Tashfeen Malik, and Syed Farook, the son; terrorists who masterminded the San Bernardino massacre and most likely the recent Rahami, the chicken pressure cooker man.

But Islamic Jihad is much bigger than the biggest American fear of terrorism; there is Muslim migration, Islamization and infiltration at the top level. During 1978, the conference for Muslim Minority Affairs directed by Huma’s father Syed Zaynul Abedin met with Maulana Muhammad Yousuf (The Prince) of Jamaat-e-Islami, Pakistan branch ( محمد يوسف أمير الجماعة الإسلامية باكستان).

The latter went as far back as 1927 when Maududi wrote a book called Jihad in Islam, in which he highlighted his view that the role of jihad was to fight to establish Islam as a political ideology and then use jihad to forcibly spread the ideology to the whole world to establish an Islamic State:

‘Islam wishes to destroy all states and governments anywhere on the face of the earth, which are opposed to the ideology and programme of Islam regardless of the country or the nation which rules it. The purpose of Islam is to set up a state on the basis of its own ideology and programme, regardless of which nation assumes the role of the standard-bearer of Islam or the rule of which nation is undermined in the process of the establishment of an ideological Islamic State. Islam requires the earth — not just portion, but the whole planet’.

But how can Islam rule “the earth”? The Abedins were the “experts” who provided Jamaat-e-Islami with the study and research on the demography of Muslim populations who can carry out such task and worked extensively at the Abdul Aziz University in Saudi Arabia where it was the main duty of the Abedins to spark the Muslim Minority Affairs program with a U.S. branch which Huma worked as the masthead at IMMA (Institute for Muslim Minority Affairs). The study was done in order to assess Muslim populations overseas and see how they can slowly immigrate into host nations to change the host nations through Da’wa (Islamic proselytization). Isn’t this what we see happening today?

The Abedin’s contact, Yusuf (The Prince) came after Abu Al-Ala Maududi, who was key in the Tabligh in the Indian subcontinent. Maududi died in 1979 while the prince died last year in February in a Bangladesh jail.

Maududi’s Islamic supremacy and Jamaat-e-Islami’s was involved in genocide against unarmed Bengalis in 1971 led the Bengali government to outlaw Maududi’s books in 2010.

And if Al-Qaeda recruiter Anwar al-Awlaki spoke at an ICNA event in 2002, before he joined al-Qaeda and was dangerous as a terrorist, how much more danger could someone like Huma Abedin cause and leak the highest sensitive information?

No, America does not understand the type of danger its in, and as Trump suggested, a serious assessment is necessary, not just from terror fronts, but from a policy point where Islamists must be stopped influencing policy from within, right at the top.

I run into all sorts of naive Americans who will ask: how could Huma be an Islamist, she dresses western and married a Jew?

America cannot comprehend, that while a Hijab could be a clue for a female terror mastermind, but the Islamist with a much bigger agenda, can look very western as commanded by Sheikh Yusuf Qaradawi for the Sisterhood, in his instructions of how to apply Islamic Muruna and be allowed to violate Sharia law to be stealth.

With Muruna, Huma Abedin, a practicing Muslim, is allowed to marry Jewish former Congressman Anthony Weiner even if he is now being investigated for pedophilia sexting to a minor.

It becomes absolutely permissible in Islam where sanctioning prohibitions apply. In fact, it makes it even more suspicious that a Muslim woman like Huma with her extensive background in Islamic movements marry this pedophile Jew!

It was al-Qaradawi, the spiritual head of the Muslim Brotherhood, who introduced Muruna to the American Muslim community in December of 1989 at the annual conference of the Association of Muslim Youth Forums. The Muslim Brotherhood leader introduced this tactic along with a 30-year plan (1990-2020) of conquest for Muslims in the U.S. It would include a tactic that would permit Islamic prohibitions:

Muruna was designed to catapult and advance Sharia by using Western means. If one thinks that Sharia, with its harsh code, is problematic enough, how about the elimination of the kinder, gentler laws? Muruna is literally accomplished by permitting behavior normally so eschewed by Sharia that Westerners logically assume a more moderate version of Islam when such prohibitions are suddenly permitted. Westerners’ eyes are, in fact, deceiving them. Muruna is about going to great lengths to gain interests through a much deeper level of deception while simultaneously lowering the guard and gaining the support of the infidels.

The consultations of the Abedin family did not only encompass Jamaat-e-Islami in the Indian subcontinent, but also in Saudi Arabia where Tashfeen Malik also lived while receiving her dose of Wahhabist ideology. Huma’s involvement in The Muslim Minority Affairs program and the proof of membership can be seen in the link [here] which makes an ironclad case, she, her mother, brother and father were instrumental in sparking the movement in the U.S. and they all worked as a collective unit on this mission with the late King Fahd bin Abdul Aziz [here]. There, working with Jamaat-e-Islami, the plan was established by the team to flood the U.S. with Muslim minorities, which was clearly expressed in the Abedins’ Institute for Muslim Minority Affairs—on whose Board Huma Abedin served for years.

And if in doubt of what we say here, (click here) and use Google translate to read Huma’s father, “Sayed/Syed Zaynul Abedin” (his name as major contributor is on page 134) in the 143 page manifesto commissioned by the Muslim Wahhabists which stated:

This snapshot in English says: “The Muslim societies in all continents of the world exist as either ‘Muslim Nation’ or ‘Muslim Minorities’. The assessment to determine what constitutes ‘state’ from a ‘minority state’ is done based on a number of measures. First the numbers scale, which is, if a nation has Muslims exceed half the population and its Constitution states that Islam is its official religion or that Islamic Sharia is its source of law, this state is then considered an Islamic state.” (p.29) “Since the number of Muslims has risen greatly in the last years where they became 1.3 billion Muslims. From these we have (900) million already in Muslim nations. The 400 million live as communities and as Muslim Minority” (p. 31) “… In Africa resides (250) million Muslims and in Europe resides (60) million Muslims and in North America and South America resides (10) million Muslims. So, according to these statistics it is expected that the number of Muslims will reach 2.6 billion six hundred thousand within a short span of time. The Muslims then will become a mighty and effective power in the world, of course, due to the increase in their numbers—then these will shift the demographic balance in their favor.” (p. 32). It actually maps out with statistics and demographic analysis every nation where Muslim minorities exist. Huma’s mother is an expert on demography and world populations and contributed greatly to that effect in the JMMA journal. Regardless how small the numbers, these are expected to advance Wahhabist ideology. The Abedin’s contribution in the Wahhabist Manifesto pulls no punches. It mentions “puritan Islam” as directed by “Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab,” the father of Wahhabism: “Allah destined this region [Saudi Arabia] for a historic role. So He commissioned the two Imams—Muhammad bin Saud and Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab, may Allah have mercy upon them. But the times have passed on Imam Muhammad bin Saud by the emergence of the reformer—Muhammad bin AbdulWahhab. So the two Imams cooperated together to judge by what Allah brought forth, to fight against heresy and to bring Muslims back to puritan Islam.” (p. 8 ) Indeed, all over it, it discusses accomplishments in ISNA, MSA, banking, centers and even names the mosques designated to fulfill the plan in the United States, except there are obstacles. The United States is the home of the main obstacle that hinders their agenda—the Jews. There the manifesto shifts, sounding more like an Arab version of Mein Kampf. Here I include the original snapshot from the document itself and translated it to English: “The greatest challenge that faces Muslims in the United States and Canada are the Jews who take advantage of their material ability and their media to distort the image of Islam and Muslims there by spreading their lies and distortions in the minds of the people in these countries. The Jews employ their efforts and direct their material wealth and their high positions to serve Zionist interests in the Arab region. They [the Jews] take advantage of situations to distort the image of Arabs and Muslims. The Zionist organizations spend enormous efforts to obstruct the spread of Islam in these areas.” (P. 79-80) The House of Al Saud had used Huma’s father Sayed Zaynul Abedin’s work Muslim Minorities in the West published in 1998 as part of 29 works to construct a plan to conquer the world with Wahhabi Islam (see P. 134) and “The Muslim Minority Affairs” in the west was a major discussion with the United States to be infiltrated with Islamists is mentioned throughout. We only showed 4 snapshots out of a whole 150 page manual. Page after page explained the Abedin’s “Affairs”, not simply as a title, or as a religious or even a social activism, but as a Saudi foreign policy, a jurisprudence and commandment from the highest of authorities commissioned to the Saudi Ministry of Religious Affairs. It was an entire management system using “The Muslim Minority Affairs” as the main vehicle to bring in Muslim immigrants bringing victory against an infidel world by increasing the numbers of Muslims entering the U.S.

It spoke of recruiting Muslims that live in non-Muslim lands and transforming them as a collective unit. It spoke of already established centers, educational programs, mosques and organizations in the United States like ISNA and MSA, all geared towards hindering any western plan for Muslim assimilation in a non-Muslim host nation. It mentioned “The Muslim Society of North America (ISNA) and the Muslim Students Association (MSA) [which Huma was member] established in the United States in 1962” (p. 65), as key agents to protect Muslims from assimilation. It named the mosques and centers in major United States cities established to carry out the mission. Five decades of efforts were spent with billions to ensure that Muslim refugees and immigrants will be an “unassimilated group” which then can infuence the non-Muslim host nation and other nations, regardless of how small the numbers of Muslims, by shifting the demographic scale due to their population growth in favor of this Saudi agenda. It explained how a gradual change would ensue by becoming a major revolutionary powerhouse that will tilt the host nation in favor of Muslims due to their increase as a population. It was a conundrum to transform a nation from within, where a Minority population can act as a ffth column, incubating in the host nation with the intent of gradually implementing the Wahhabist plans. Translating the manifesto was as if I was watching a science program on how a cell is invaded by a virus, where it gradually does its thing until the host cell fnally succumbs to the disease. The whole case of such infiltration takes a book which I documented in my book, The Case For Islamophobia. Trump is right. And when it comes to Trump’s call to ban Muslims entering the U.S. until “we figure it all out,” Abedin’s Wahhabist Saudi Menifesto is the best reference to prove the case. The Abedins went back and forth from east to west, even working during 1978 with Maulana Muhammad Yousuf of Jamaat-e-Islami in India. Yusuf came after Abu Al-Ala Maududi, who was key in the Tabligh in the Indian subcontinent’s equivalent of the Muslim Brotherhood. It has extensive ties to Wahhabists, including Al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups. They represent an extremist Salafst brand. Then they travel to Saudi Arabia working with an Al-Qaeda godfather, Naseef, who spearheaded IMMA and commissioned the Abedins from Saudi Arabia to launch the program in the U.S. and the United Kingdom. Do Americans think they circulated the earth, promoting this program solely by themselves? Were the Abedins fulflling an “American dream”, “representing our country and the democratic values that we hold dear” as President Obama says? Or is it that they are fulflling a Saudi Wahhabist fantasy that our silence is making a reality? What is ISNA’s Mohamed Magid, an entity in the Saudi manifesto, doing in the White House, sitting across the table from Huma Abedin who was an IMMA assistant editor, another entity created by the House of Saud? The Abedins’ boss, Abdullah Omar Naseef, never faced American justice. Is oil more powerful than justice? Why does the State Department keep the masses in the dark, not wanting them to connect the dots between the Saudi Wahhabist plans and the Abedins’ IMMA and Sisterhood program? Only then, when they connect the dots, can they begin to unravel why the Abedin family works with nefarious characters like Naseef and Qaradawi. Only then can they understand how inter-linked these organizations are, their layers and sub- layers. IMMA was and is a family affair under Saudi management, a foreign entity that intends to do harm to United States interests. Only when Americans fnally wake up and ask politicians why it is taboo to discuss Huma Abedin, and demand the refutation of facts coupled with answers that are devoid of rhetoric. Only then will they support courageous candidates like Donald Trump. These are heroes, not slanderers as many imply. They represent the interests of the people and not the policy of silence. House Speaker John Boehner said to question Huma Abedin’s loyalty is “dangerous”; silence is more deadly. When Bin Laden was fnally given justice, no one was looking for jurisdictions. Yet, Al Saud and their henchmen still roam free, making sure America remains addicted to oil and constantly silent. Read Abedin’s Mein Kampf:Abedins-Mein-Kampf and feast your eyes you sleeping American. Also read Huma Abedin’s extensive ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. WAKE UP YOU SLEEPING AMERICANS AND ELECT DONALD TRUMP AND THROW THE BUMS OUT OF WASHINGTON Read Abedin’s connections to the Muslim Brotherhood: CHRISTIANS ARE BEING KILLED AND RAPED EVERY SINGLE DAY, PLEASE CLICK HERE TO MAKE A DONATION TO OUR RESCUE TEAM THAT WILL SAVE THE LIVES OF CHRISTIANS FROM PERSECUTION

print