All, there has been some discussion here on the potential need for a user led full fork if miners refuse to activate Classic and increase the block size. I have started a full fork project to prepare for this possibility and anyone who is interested is welcome to help.My thinking is if an alt coin is going to win because Bitcoin has been artificially capped, then it is best if that alt coin preserves as much of Bitcoin's transaction history and ownership as possible. This also incentivizes the large Bitcoin user base of early adopters and owners, since they automatically have an ownership stake in the forked branch.My goal here is not to decide what Bitcoin should be, but to start a user lead rebellion against what is happening. I hope this effort kick starts many different projects that provide users many different options, and through that choice the free market can choose what is the best path, not a corrupt board of directors. If a different project creates a fork that gains more traction but is closer to Satoshi's white paper than today's Bitcoin, that is a great outcome.The discussion thread is here, which describes the plan, where the github project is, etc.The coding effort is not too involved I believe, only a few changes are needed and they are relatively straight forward to implement. A couple months should be enough. The code is directly forked from Classic 0.11.2 and will be easy to diff from that version.I originally announced this on /r/btc, but the post was censored within 5 minutes. Then when I posted a question asking how to find out why my post was censored, that post was censored as well. So apparently /r/btc has gone full North Korea too. Given the history of the censorship from BCT and /r/bitcoin this tells me the project is pushing the right buttons....