The next stage of the “neoliberal world order” is the neo-federal world order, now what is that? Neo-federalism, also known as world federalism, is a more academic form of the old philosophy which traditionally focused on the development of a world federal government. By switching the word “world” for “neo and a dash” it makes the proposal more interesting to the millennial and post-millennial generations.

While older world federalists seem to run away from the use of a “ism”, the new generations aren’t willing to wash language in the need to soften the image of our true end-goals. This is because the older generations are still reacting to the old paradigm which affected leftists and government sceptics following the end of the second world war. The need for government establishment types to flush out these “undesirable groups” from society would spread throughout the US media and institutions leading to a post-war culture which rejected the brainwashing of the masses in an effort to defeat the communists.

Younger generations have come to be disgusted with the washing of language to comfort the government’s goals to lead us to either to glorify capitalism or look down on people who look different than us. This is all in a goal to “further US interest”. The new generation of millennials and post-millennials like Neo from the film “The Matrix”, we can see through the old forms of propaganda. And it is because our new abilities to see beyond the old forms of propaganda that a new form of propaganda has been created; neo-propaganda.

Neo-propaganda doesn’t hide behind creative words and mental tricks. Which in the past they said, this is not propaganda, and today we say, yes, this is propaganda. Which they lied to cover the truth, we say the truth and deem what also shouldn’t be said but dealt with. This new form of propaganda is all around us. We realize that arguments will never be proven and if there is no winner of the argument then why have it. We choose to create proxy debates which the derivative of the derivative of the actual argument.

We have come to understand the battle which is happening over thought and language in the debate over the new dominating philosophy. We do not fear the truth, or to fail. We would rather try something new than continue living in a world of stagnation. While the establishment continues to believe chaos will ensue or, in the least, the people will make the wrong decisions, if provided with the truth. The problem is that such a thought is irrelevant from the view of a neo-federalists, because we firmly believe that individual freedom is more important than national power—now how many in the establishment will say that out loud.