All during the campaign, the one common refrain that Hillary Clinton heard above all else was concerning her misuse of email servers. The facts of her cavalier attitude towards classified material dogged her every day of her run until calls to “LOCK HER UP!” were surpassed by her defeat. It seems that the flow in corruption from Clinton is not something that corked itself shut after her loss. New information released from Judicial Watch shows 1,184 pages of State Department records that expose even more depth to her folly.

To quote their recent article, this includes “previously unreleased Hillary Clinton email exchanges, revealing additional instances of Abedin and Hillary Clinton sending classified information through unsecured email accounts and contributors being given special access to the former secretary of state.” Basically, the State Department is telling us that America has certainly dodged a bullet by not having her in office.

Huma Abedin is not a name that we have heard since Clinton’s run and Anthony Weiner’s sexting, but she is not forgotten to those who are conducting investigations into the handling of classified material by the campaign. A court order from May 5, 2015, is what caused the new information to come to light. It was a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed against the State Department following the failure “to respond to a March 18 FOIA request (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:15-cv-00684)),” according to the article.

The wording of the lawsuit is as follows: “All emails of official State Department business received or sent by former Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin from January 1, 2009, through February 1, 2013, using a non-“state.gov” email address.” Revealed were “29 previously undisclosed Clinton emails,” bringing the total count thus far to “288 emails that were not part of the 55,000 pages of emails that Clinton turned over to the State Department.” The data is said to have been “classified as the material includes information to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy; foreign relations or foreign activities of the US, including confidential sources.”

Information about Guantanamo prisoner Binyam Mohamed was included in an email, as was his request for “various classified intelligence documents,” which contained the case that the government had against him. This information could have (and may have been for all that we know) been hacked and sold to ISIS or used as blackmail to do so. This is just one possible way that such data could be abused, of which there are many.

It is revealed also that in April 2010, Sid Blumenthal sent a pair of messages to Clinton containing information that is now classified, again showing that she had no prowess or instinct in the handling of sensitive data. This was then forwarded via unsecured networks to Huma as information to be printed out about “change of government in the Kyrgyz Republic.” February 2010 saw former Deputy Chief of Staff to Clinton, Jake Sullivan, emailed to “Clinton’s and Abedin’s [sic] unsecure email accounts” data that the State Department called “to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy; foreign relations or foreign activities of the US, including confidential sources.”

The loss of protocol continues on April 2010,March 9, 2010, March 15, 2010, and, February 23, 2010. They talked about the funerals of Bill and Hillary Clinton. There were even emails found that showed Clinton telling where she was going to be and when. This latter tidbit may sound as though it only jeopardizes her, but the email was sent to “Clinton Foundation officials Doug Band, Terry Krivnic, Margaret Steenberg, and others, and forwarded to Abedin’s [sic] unsecure email account.” Not only were all of those lives put at risk, but so were her service details, other officers who were to be present, and likely many others. Also, this opened the door for her other unsecured networks to be hacked to eavesdrop at certain times, since we know already that her Blackberry was in question.

The never ending litany of facts against Clinton will never stop nor slow, it seems. They go on and on like some nightmare that returns every time that we close our eyes. Democrats will charge that this does not matter since she did not win, but such a thought has no basis in fact. The hard truth is that the kinds of things gleaned just from what we know that she did so far are things that could have fallout well into the future. This was seen by her husband’s poor presidential performance that saw our nation’s nuclear trade secrets fall into Chinese hands. Today, many years removed from the negligence, America has WMD made from that very technology pointing at us and our families.

Also hidden is the fact that Hillary Clinton has dropped not only hints, but copious amounts of campaign signs, upon New York City. She has designs on being the mayor of the Big Apple, and since the city leans so far to the left that they can not stand upright, she could easily win. Do we want people sitting in the Mayor’s Seat that have a history of corruption, bad intelligence handling and no idea how to send or store classified or sensitive data? New York has seen enough misery due to bad practices, some even suggest that these kinds of lackadaisical mindsets are what lead to 9/11. Are we going then to elect someone who would allow something like it to happen again?

Beyond the fact that Clinton is soft on the border, wrong on trade, wrong on healthcare, and mistaken on global warming, this cheater is also terrible with information that the voters elect her to be mindful of. Even Democrats have to see that they may be opposed to all things “Republican,” but at the end of the day, they don’t want themselves nor their families harmed. Upon seeing this news and when viewing them in light of how poorly Clinton really did at each of her jobs, even if the handle is pulled for a Democrat in that Mayor’s Chair, it may not be for Clinton. For those that love their lives and their nation, electing someone who could not be bothered to learn why some servers are secured against threats, both foreign and domestic, is not someone who they want at the seat of power in the city that never sleeps, because hackers don’t rest, either.