Rep. Dan Crenshaw wrote a fairly vicious thread about House Democrats playing the pre-existing condition card in an effort to deliberately mislead voters. We realize Dan is a junior rep and is not quite so jaded and cynical as the rest of us who have been watching these a-holes lie for YEARS about health care.

You can tell Dan was pissed when he wrote this.

And who could blame him?

We reached a new low in deceitful politics today. The lies about protection for pre-existing conditions continue. This was one of the most shameful and dishonest bills passed in the House so far.#HR986 — Dan Crenshaw (@DanCrenshawTX) May 9, 2019

Dems … lying about health care?! WE’RE SHOCKED!

Bill is called “Protection for Pre-existing Conditions Act” but it has NOTHING to do with pre-existing conditions. It is a bill that limits states’ ability to innovate with more cost-effective solutions. Dems labeled it that way to mislead voters. Shameful. — Dan Crenshaw (@DanCrenshawTX) May 9, 2019

Yup. They love pretending the bill they’re working on does something positive when it’s usually only positive for them and or the government. Then when Republicans vote against it they can say, ‘HEY LOOK, REPUBLICANS HATE YOU AND WANT YOU TO GO WITHOUT HEALTH CARE.’

As we said, we’ve been watching these shills do this for years.

States that have successfully innovated under current law include Alaska, Maryland, Oregon, Maine, Wisconsin, Minnesota, and New Jersey. They have saved money on premiums AND protected pre-existing conditions. Dems are against that, AND lying about it. — Dan Crenshaw (@DanCrenshawTX) May 9, 2019

Dems want more government at the federal level so of course, they’d be against states figuring these things out for themselves. Let’s not forget what’s really the most important to Democrats, and that’s making Republicans look bad, especially the president. At the end of the day, all they really want is power.

And if that means they lie to their base so be it.

It’s what Democrats do best, lie — Carolyn L Daniels (@witchylou02) May 10, 2019

True story.

Oh, good, Chris Hayes chimed in.

Do you support DOJ’s position in the the current lawsuit to scrap the ACA? — Chris Hayes (@chrislhayes) May 10, 2019

*sigh*

get your advocating journalism swag on there Hayes, real professional — Gianbattista (@gbtiepolo1) May 10, 2019

You’re deflecting Chris — Eduardo Neret (@eduneret) May 10, 2019

So what else is new?

From what we can tell, Dan did not respond.

#TalkToTheHand

Related:

‘Yeah, and monkeys might fly outta my butt!’ VICE asked ‘experts’ if AOC will end up being president and OMG-LOL

Come GET SOME! Blue-check broads try ganging up on Dana Loesch and learn the HARD WAY why that’s a bad idea

‘WELP, this is bulls**t.’ James Woods absolutely WALLOPS ‘coward Jack’ in statement about Twitter suspending his account