By Stefanos Evripidou

RESEARCHERS have raised initial calculations of a Cyprus peace dividend upwards, estimating that a solution could raise per capita incomes by approximately €12,000 over 20 years, expanding the size of the economy by around €20 billion.

Last March, economists Fiona Mullen, Alexander Apostolides and Mustafa Besim revealed the findings of a preliminary study on the ‘Cyprus peace dividend’ funded by Sweden, Denmark, Finland and Norway, estimating GDP to rise by an extra €18 billion two decades after reunification.

However, new research on the study published yesterday by PRIO Cyprus Centre showed that the peace dividend could be even greater if one takes a closer look at the benefits a solution would bring to each sector of the economy.

The initial results were first presented to Greek Cypriot and Turkish Cypriot business representatives in Brussels in early March. They were asked to give their own input, which was then incorporated by the researchers to produce the final report presented yesterday.

Speaking at the event UN Special Representative Lisa Buttenheim welcomed the “timely contribution” to the public debate on the talks, as well as the two leaders’ decision to speed up the process by meeting twice a month.

“As the negotiations intensify, Cypriots will naturally have many questions about the impact of a settlement on their own lives and on their own ‘pockets’,” said Buttenheim, who has taken on the role of acting UN Special Adviser following the departure of Alexander Downer.

The research undertaken attempts to address these questions by putting a number on the benefits to the economy as a whole and to individuals, she said.

The acting special adviser hailed the potential total peace dividend of some €20 billion over 20 years as “a great prospect”.

She encouraged people to challenge the models and figures used by the researchers in the study and engage in an inclusive debate.

“Because in engaging, you take a step, for just a moment, into a future united Cyprus. You dare to imagine what the future can look like together.

“You start to focus on the opportunities—not only those that come from a settlement itself but also the permanent gains that may arise… as the authors say, ‘from opening up a Turkish market of 74 million people to Greek Cypriots and a European Union market of 500 million people to Turkish Cypriots’. Imagine that.”

Buttenheim said yesterday’s launch was the result of “a renewed vibrancy of civil society, which has a crucial role to play in building public confidence in a better future”.

The study followed a two-pronged approach, looking at total factor productivity (TFP) or the capacity for long-term growth with and without a solution, and then potential growth on a sector-by-sector basis, and looking at the average of the two combined.

“In the past, the tendency has been to see the costs and benefits of a solution in a static way: there was an appreciation of the immediate costs, but there was little understanding of the dynamic benefits,” said the research team in a press release.

The study works on the basic assumption that a settlement comes into force in 2016, and that a united Cyprus will be based on a bicommunal, bizonal federation with political equality as outlined in the joint declaration of February 11, 2014.

All-island GDP at constant 2012 prices would rise from just under €20bn in 2016 (Year 1) to just under €45bn by 2035 (Year 20) compared with around €25bn without a solution. In other words, the peace dividend over 20 years would be approximately €20bn.

According to the study, the average peace dividend every year would be just over €2bn on average in the first five years after a solution, just under €5bn in the first ten years and just over €10bn the first 20 years.

GDP per capita, that is, the income to individuals, would rise from around €15,500 in 2016 to around €28,500 in 2035, compared with approximately €16,500 without a solution.

Thus, annual incomes, at constant 2012 prices, would be around €12,000 higher by Year 20 with a solution than without one, said the researchers.

The annual average growth rate would be 4.5 per cent over 20 years, compared with just 1.6 per cent without a solution, with the peak growth rates coming in the first ten years. The lift to real GDP growth rates would therefore be around 2.8 percentage points on average each year.

Per-capita incomes in the Turkish Cypriot community would be 91 per cent of the Greek Cypriot community incomes in 20 years, near full convergence, compared with around 60 per cent of Greek Cypriot incomes today.

The various sectors analysed are: tourism; construction; wholesale and retail trade; transport; financial and professional services; and higher education.

Researches also looked at solution-specific investment like natural gas (potential pipeline to Turkey in addition to an LNG plant), housing and Famagusta’s reconstruction.

“A pipeline to Turkey would generate €1.3bn in additional gross investment. More importantly, it would yield much earlier government gas revenues than would be the case without a solution,” said the study.

Rejuvenating Famagusta, including Varosha and Famagusta port, could generate, in a low-investment scenario, €5bn.

However, sector specialists informed the authors that a “big-vision idea”, such as a state-of-the art eco-city that integrated the whole of Famagusta, could generate investment of up to €15bn, and is more likely to attract private investment than the low-investment scenario. The researches took the lower scenario in their assumptions.





