Article content continued

All together, she is seeking $147,193 from the company best known for its yoga apparel.

The Government of Alberta is also named as a plaintiff, and is seeking to have Lululemon pay over $2,000 in hospital and practitioner costs, plus interest.

Beaulieu argues that Lululemon was “negligent” in three aspects of the jacket’s design, including the use of elastic material for a cord that hangs near the wearer’s face, the use of a metal tip on the draw cord, and failing to use other, safer draw cord material when there was “little or no advantage to using elastic and the risk of harm was obvious, foreseeable and easily preventable.”

In her statement of claim, Beaulieu said the jacket she bought was one of the models subject to a Health Canada recall last year. In June 2015, a recall for a number of jackets and sweaters that had elastic draw cords with hard metal or plastic tips in the neck area was issued after reports of five consumer injuries in Canada and one in the United States. The recall described the trouble with the jackets as being that the elastic could be pulled or caught something, and then snap back, hitting the wearer in the face. more than 300,000 of the tops were sold, most before 2014.