We have all heard of the term ‘Melting Pot’, it means the mixing of different races and cultures into one monolithic group forming the ‘New World and the New Man’. The term was popularized in 1908 by a play called ‘The Melting Pot’ written by the British born Jewish Zionist Israel Zangwill, his parents were Jewish immigrants from Russia.



Israel Zangwill

The play has come to represent the importation of mass non-European immigration into America which up until 1965 was over 90% white, and the assimilation and mixing with them into a ‘melting pot’. The idea of melting different cultures and ethnicities into sameness to create a ‘new man’ had been spoken of in the 18th and 19th century, but with the production of the 1908 play, it became popularised and known as the ‘melting pot’ that is spoken of today.

It is said that the 1908 play was idealising the mixing of people from different European nations into the ‘new American’. And to an extent this is what happened prior to 1965 and the Open Immigration Act, vigorously campaigned for by Jewish groups. Since 1965, the term ‘melting pot’ has meant the mixing of all races from all over the world into one group of uniformity bereft of any racial identity, the ‘post racial society’. This is not only happening in America, but every nation that had a once white majority population. The pursuit of ‘racial diversity’ in white nations, is the pursuit of an end to real global racial diversity for the benefit of one group of people who see themselves as reigning supreme over us all.

One of the characters in the 1908 play says:

“America is God’s Crucible, where all the races of Europe are melting and reforming! Germans, Frenchmen, Irishmen and Englishmen, Jews and Russians, into the Crucible with you all! God is making the American.”

Is this what Israel Zangwill really wanted to put across in his play, or was it the precursor for what happened in 1965 and the opening of America’s borders to the whole world? Is it just a coincidence that Zangwill, a Jewish Zionist, and Jews who campaigned for the Open Immigration Act have advocated the mixing of races and cultures?

Lets take a closer look at Israel Zangwill.

Zangwill was a Fabian socialist and advocate of world government, he was also very supportive of the Bolshevik Revolution. Benjamin Netanyahu writes of Zangwill, in his book A Place Among the Nations: Israel and the World (Bantam Books, New York, 1993):

{p. 11} The receptivity that the great courts of the day accorded him in no way blinded Herzl to the primacy of winning Jewish adherents to Zionism. After Nordau, his greatest conquest among Jewish {p. 12} intellectuals was the celebrated English writer Israel Zangwill, who used his talents and influence to spread the creed of Zionism in Britain, which at the time was the foremost world power.

Read More on Israel Zangwill and his close links to Jewish banking families such as the Rothschilds and the Schiffs.

http://www.centurean2.wordpress.com/2011/07/08/israel-zangwill-fabian-zionist-advocate-of-world-government/

A revealing quote of Israel Zangwill:

“No, the real American has not yet arrived. He is only in the crucible, i tell you, he will be the fusion of all races, perhaps the coming superman.”

Israel Zangwill, being a Fabian socialist had close links with George Bernard Shaw, and one Israel Cohen, author of ‘A Racial Programme for the 20th Century’, a book that is said to be a hoax by the usual suspects, but the proof of which can be seen in your nations today. The only remaining quote from this book is the following:

“We must realize that our party’s most powerful weapon is racial tensions. By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by whites, we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party. In America we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavor to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause.”

Entered into the Congressional Record on June 7, 1957 (Vol. 103, p. 8559, top of page.)



Israel Cohen

This book is now out of print, and the existence of the author Israel Cohen is denied even though he was one of the founders of Fabian Socialism in Britain, had written many books, and the foreword in a book by Israel Zangwill called ‘The Schnorrers’. It stands to reason that the existence of such a book, ‘a Racial Programme for the 20th Century’, would blow wide open the real agenda of mass non-white immigration hence the need to deny its existence.

It took 2 years for the existence of the book and the author to be denied after all books had been seized and printing had been stopped. The book was said to be a humanitarian follow up to the Zangwill ‘The Melting Pot’ play. This was revealed by a man named Myron Fagon a staunch anti-communist.

Whether you believe this book and quote to be a hoax or not doesn’t matter in the grand scheme of things. If you are awake to the ‘diversity’ agenda and the real reasons behind mass immigration, then it passes the duck test, ie if it quacks like a duck, then its a duck. The proof is in the visual, and only the awakened can see it. You can see the link between Zangwill and his melting pot idea, and Cohen and his ‘racial programme for the 20th century’. They both have one defining and recurring theme, the Jewish desire to use race as a weapon against their primary foe, the White European.

People often refer to the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion as being a hoax, but ultimately it is immaterial because whoever wrote them has provided us with a prophetic look into the future and the Racial Programme for the 20th century can be put into the same category. George Orwells ‘1984’ was a work of fiction, however nobody would deny that today there is an uncanny similarity between what he wrote, and the world we live in today. It could easily be considered a warning of a dystopian future that he had forseen and which we live in today. Again, the same applies to the Protocols and the Racial Programme for the 20th Century.

The proof is in the pudding.