It’s fairly common knowledge that the DNC has a lot of assistance from the MSM when it comes to spin, but the apparent coordination of narrative to describe the impeachment witnesses (most of whom haven’t actually witnessed anything) is a sight to behold. Becket Adams from the Washington Examiner has a full column about this, but he also tweeted out some examples. It’s something else:

A defense of using a thesaurus to expand one’s own vocabulary. A thread: — ???? ?????? ????? (@BecketAdams) November 22, 2019

There’s one word the Dems and media just coincidentally shared in their descriptions of impeachment witnesses:

CNN commentator and former DHS official Jack Tomarchio on Oct. 23: Ambassador William Taylor’s record is "impeccable." MSNBC co-host Mike Barnacle on Oct. 24: Taylor has "impeccable credentials.” — ???? ?????? ????? (@BecketAdams) November 22, 2019

NBC News’ Peter Alexander declared on Oct. 24: “Bill Taylor, Marie Yovanovitch — people whose reputations remain impeccable.” The Daily Beast’s Jonathan Alter on Oct. 26: Taylor had an “impeccable career.” — ???? ?????? ????? (@BecketAdams) November 22, 2019

MSNBC commentator and former assistant U.S. attorney Mimi Rocah on Oct. 28: Alexander Vindman is a man of “impeccable character,” CNN’s Don Lemon on Oct. 28: Vindman has “impeccable credentials.” The NYT's Maggie Haberman on Oct. 29: Vindman's credentials are “impeccable.” — ???? ?????? ????? (@BecketAdams) November 22, 2019

The New Yorker’s Jeffrey Toobin on Oct. 29: Vindman "seems like an impeccably credentialed” person. Newsweek on Oct. 29: Vindman’s testimony is expected to carry weight given his “impeccable resume.” Foreign Policy on Oct. 29: Vindman is a man with an "impeccable resume.” — ???? ?????? ????? (@BecketAdams) November 22, 2019

Washington Times columnist Donald Lambro on Nov. 1: Vindman has an “impeccable career record.” CNN senior political reporter Nia-Malika Henderson on Nov. 7: The witnesses who have testified against POTUS have “impeccable credentials.” — ???? ?????? ????? (@BecketAdams) November 22, 2019

CNN legal analyst Michael Zeldin on Nov. 10: Taylor has an "impeccable resume.” The New York Times' Michelle Goldberg on Nov. 11: Kent, Taylor, Vindman, and Yovanovitch, are “people with kind of impeccable national security credentials.” — ???? ?????? ????? (@BecketAdams) November 22, 2019

CNN contributor Julian Epstein on Nov. 13: Taylor's and Kent's credentials are "impeccable.” CNN’s Henderson (again) on Nov. 13: The impeachment witnesses "obviously" have "impeccable resumes.” — ???? ?????? ????? (@BecketAdams) November 22, 2019

The Associated Press’ Jonathan Lemire on Nov. 14: The impeachment witnesses have “impeccable reputations.” The New York Times’ Goldberg (again) on Nov. 14: Taylor and Kent have “impeccable credentials.” — ???? ?????? ????? (@BecketAdams) November 22, 2019

MSNBC’s Nicole Wallace on Nov. 15: Yovanovitch is an “impeccable witness.” NBC legal analyst Danny Cevallos on Nov. 18: Kent, Taylor, Vindman, and Yovanovitch “generally have impeccable credentials.” — ???? ?????? ????? (@BecketAdams) November 22, 2019

And for no reason at all: — ???? ?????? ????? (@BecketAdams) November 22, 2019

Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., on Oct. 22: Taylor has "impeccable credentials.” Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Tenn., on Nov. 6: The impeachment witnesses, and foreign service agents in general, have "impeccable records of honesty and scholarship.” — ???? ?????? ????? (@BecketAdams) November 22, 2019

Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., said on Nov. 11: Taylor is a diplomat of "impeccable credentials.” Rep. Eliot Engel, D-N.Y., on Nov. 13: The impeachment witnesses have "impeccable records.” — ???? ?????? ????? (@BecketAdams) November 22, 2019

Read it all here. It’s absolutely amazing.

Impeccable thread. — Nick Carroll (@LibertyAndTech) November 22, 2019

Narrative Engineers spouting the talking points of the day — Fredo Delecto (@CapCube) November 22, 2019

They’re not even trying to hide it either.