India's record against Australia

In the last 20 years, India are the only team to have won more Tests than they have lost against Australia, winning 16 and losing just 14. England also have 16 wins in this period, but they lost 30 Tests.

Even against the dominant Australia sides of the 2000s led by Steve Waugh and Ricky Ponting, India had a creditable record, winning nine Tests and losing nine. Every other team lost at least twice as many Tests as they won.

All countries versus Australia under Ponting/Waugh, 1999-2010 Team Mat Won Lost Draw W/L Ratio India 24 9 9 6 1.00 England 29 8 16 5 0.50 South Africa 18 4 13 1 0.31 West Indies 22 3 17 2 0.18 Pakistan 14 1 13 0 0.08 Sri Lanka 10 1 6 3 0.17 Bangladesh 4 0 4 0 0.00 New Zealand 15 0 11 4 0.00 Zimbabwe 3 0 3 0 0.00

Even if the analysis is restricted to more recent times, say the last ten years starting 2004, India have won 10 Tests and lost only eight, once again making them the only team to have won more Tests than they have lost against Australia.

Playing in Australia

While it is true that a bulk of India's wins came at home, their record in Australia is not to be scoffed at. The first table below shows that India played 11 Tests against Australia during the tenure of Ponting and Waugh, winning two, drawing three, and losing the remaining six. It means that India either won or drew 45 percent of their Tests in Australia during that period. No other team had a better record.

All countries versus Australia, in Australia, under Ponting/Waugh, 1999-2010 Team Mat Won Lost Draw (W+D)% India 11 2 6 3 45.45 New Zealand 7 0 4 3 42.86 South Africa 9 2 6 1 33.33 England 14 3 10 1 28.57 Sri Lanka 4 0 3 1 25.00 West Indies 11 0 10 1 9.09 Bangladesh 2 0 2 0 0.00 Pakistan 9 0 9 0 0.00 Zimbabwe 2 0 2 0 0.00

Clearly, even when Australia were at their peak, India were a formidable opponent. Restricting the comparison to more recent times, it is undeniable that the 4-0 drubbing in 2011-12 has spoiled India's recent record in the country. However, it is still not so dismal that it pales in comparison to other teams. Below is a table comparing the record of overseas teams in Australia over the last ten years. In fact, India are still second on the list of teams with the highest percentage of wins and draws in Australia.

All countries versus Australia, in Australia, since 2004 Team Mat Won Lost Draw (W+D)% South Africa 9 3 3 3 66.67 India 9 1 6 2 33.33 England 15 3 11 1 26.67 New Zealand 6 1 5 0 16.67 West Indies 6 0 5 1 16.67 Sri Lanka 7 0 6 1 14.29 Pakistan 6 0 6 0 0.00

Adelaide, venue of the first Test

India and Australia have played 10 Tests in Adelaide, with Australia winning six, India one, and the remaining three being drawn. The perception about Adelaide is that the venue assists spin. In the last five years, spinners have bowled about 38% off all overs in Adelaide, which is the highest percentage of spin bowled at any Australian venue during this period. Every other Australian venue has seen more than 70% of the overs being bowled by medium-pacers, with the fast bowlers only sending down 62% off all deliveries in Adelaide.

Though a significant chunk of the overs in Adelaide have been sent down by spinners, this has not translated into good returns for them. The below table shows that spinners average almost 60 at Adelaide, about 14 runs more than at any other venue. Pacers have a better average here, 34.05, but this too is among the worst for an Australian venue.

Pace v spin at Adelaide in the last five years Spin Pace Ground Mat Overs Runs Wkts Ave Econ SR Overs Runs Wkts Ave Econ SR Sydney 5 439.4 1560 34 45.88 3.54 77.5 1114 3779 130 29.06 3.39 51.4 Adelaide 4 584.5 1975 33 59.84 3.37 106.3 936.5 2963 87 34.05 3.16 64.6 Perth 5 302.3 1137 29 39.20 3.75 62.5 1220.2 4230 151 28.01 3.46 48.4 Melbourne 5 367.1 1159 26 44.57 3.15 85.7 1119 3350 129 25.96 2.99 52.0 Hobart 3 267.3 848 25 33.92 3.17 64.2 788.4 2333 78 29.91 2.95 60.6 Brisbane 4 367.2 1162 25 46.48 3.16 88.1 991 3142 80 39.27 3.17 74.3

The above table tells us that neither spinners nor pacers have had much success in Adelaide, suggesting that batsmen generally thrive at the venue. The below table proves that theory. Adelaide is the only Australian venue where the average score per innings has been in excess of 400 over the last 10 years. Scores in Melbourne and Perth are closer to the 300 mark, and around 350 in other venues.

Team batting stats at Australian venues in the last 10 years Ground Mat Runs/wicket Runs per over High Score Low Score Adelaide 9 40.77 3.24 620 129 Brisbane 9 36.53 3.35 602 129 Sydney 11 34.74 3.51 659 127 Hobart 4 34.44 3.24 542 136 Perth 10 32.75 3.54 569 72 Melbourne 10 30.33 3.15 513 98

At Adelaide itself, there is a significant difference between the average score in the first and second innings. The average first innings score at Adelaide in the last ten years has been 485, while teams only average 293 in the second innings.

1st and 2nd innings at Adelaide, in the last 10 years Inns Mat Runs/Wkt RPO High score Low score 1st innings 9 48.51 3.43 620 172 2nd innings 9 29.33 2.86 317 129

Since November 2005, batsmen have scored six double hundreds in the first innings at Adelaide, more than at any other venue in the world. Two of those six hundreds were scored by Michael Clarke. Clarke has scored 1279 runs from nine Tests at Adelaide, at an average of 98.4. Clarke has scored the most runs for any batsmen who has played 10 Tests or fewer at Adelaide, with Don Bradman (970 runs from seven Tests) in second spot. Over the years, Indian batsmen have also scored more runs at Adelaide (5636) than at any other Australian venue.

The broad conclusion, therefore, is that Adelaide is a good venue for the batsmen, not a great venue for pacers, and one where spinners are likely to bowl a bulk of the overs. Overall, India should be reasonably happy and fancy their chances.