As reported previously, the Shambhala International Interim Board of Directors was sworn in on October 17th with a religious oath that pledges allegiance to the now-resigned spiritual leader of the organization, Sakyong Mipham Rinpoche (Mipham Mukpo). Mukpo has been accused of sexual assault by several community members.

On December 1, Kevin Anderson, a former coordinator of the Sackville Meditation Group in Sackville, New Brunswick, wrote the following letter to the Interim Board. By email, Anderson explains that the group has recently “taken a first step away from Shambhala due to the recent allegations” against Mukpo. (Correspondence shared with permission.)

_____

Dear Shambhala Interim Board, I’m writing you because a discussion arose between some members of the

Sackville Meditation Group, concerning the appointment of the new

Interim Board. I am hoping you can help us deepen and nuance our

understanding of this. According to some media outlets, the new interim board has “Sworn a

Religious Oath to Leader Accused of Sexual Assault”. The article proceeds to discuss the implications of this, and provides what purports to be a copy of this oath. The questions that arose are threefold:

1. Is this oath text accurate as reported?

2. Who authored the text?

3. If SMR [Mukpo] has “stepped back” from the organisation for the time being,

why then was the oath worded with direct references to him? I personally am quite concerned that the optics of this kind of language

can undermine the credibility of the Interim Board. Therefore I look

forward to your input on this matter. Sincerely,

Kevin Anderson

_____

Two days later, Anderson received the following response from the Interim Board.

_____

Dear Kevin, Thank you for taking the time to write to the Interim Board. You may know it is traditional for leaders in any leadership position in Shambhala to take a oath when they begin their position. Shambhala oaths are a statement of loyalty to the principles of our community. The Shambhala Interim Board was appointed by the Transition Task Force, and is not a governing body appointed by the Sakyong. The Board functions independently of the Sakyong in terms of our legal and fiduciary responsibilities. We are currently focused on understanding the financial, operational and ethical issues before us and plan to make regular reports of progress to the community. We appreciate you taking time to contact us and will include your comments in our considerations. Yours in the Vision of Shambhala, The Shambhala Interim Board Veronika Bauer, Martina Bouey, Mark Blumenfeld, John Cobb, Jennifer Crow, Sara Lewis, Susan Ryan, Paulina Varas _____ Anderson replied on December 9th: _____ Dear Interim Board, Thanks for your reply. I will comment here, but probably not pursue this further. Imagine, for a moment, that I had asked a trusted person (a friend, or a spouse, a child, a spiritual friend) those very direct, and very reasonable (though uncomfortable) questions. If they had avoided my questions as starkly as you have, it would have eroded my trust. In that light I’m finding your answers to be dishonest. Commenting each question: 1. You could have said, “yes the wording is accurate”. Since the oath is on your website, it would have been easy to say that.

2. You avoided the question of authorship – it would have been easy to say “We don’t generally reveal authorship, but we can assure you it was not SMR”. Since you didn’t answer, that leaves open the possibility that Mr. Mukpo authored it.

3. I’m really not surprised that you didn’t address this, but in any other organization it would have made sense to build trust by at least temporarily distancing oneself from a leader. It erodes my trust that you have chosen not to do that, or somehow because of “guru logic, samaya logic” you feel unable to do so. An honest answer would have been to at least address the question in some fashion. With kind regards, Kevin Anderson