People’s access to basic rights such as water and energy could be at the mercy of multinational corporations, according to a new report into two controversial EU free trade deals.

The report claims that the agreements could allow all public services to be locked into commercial deals that would place profit above the rights of individuals to access basic services - regardless of any possible consequences for welfare.

According to the report, Public Services Under Attack, such deals would be “effectively irreversible.” They would allow multinational corporations to sue governments that try to regulate the cost of public services if it could be proved companies’ profits would be harmed.

The two trade agreements, the CETA (Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement) with Canada and the TTIP (Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership) with the US, are currently being negotiated.

In their current state, it is claimed, all public services including health, education and energy could be at risk of privatisation.

TTIP controversy: what an FOI request revealed Show all 14 1 /14 TTIP controversy: what an FOI request revealed TTIP controversy: what an FOI request revealed TTIP controversy Responding to a Freedom of Information request from an EU watchdog regarding contacts between officials and the tobacco industry, the European Commission released a set of documents that had been so heavily redacted as to be meaningless. In this 14-page letter from British American Tobacco from its London HQ, outlining its “serious concerns with the consistency of [redacted]”, only five per cent of the text was visible. TTIP controversy: what an FOI request revealed TTIP controversy Page 2 TTIP controversy: what an FOI request revealed TTIP controversy Page 3 TTIP controversy: what an FOI request revealed TTIP controversy Page 4 TTIP controversy: what an FOI request revealed TTIP controversy Page 5 TTIP controversy: what an FOI request revealed TTIP controversy Page 6 TTIP controversy: what an FOI request revealed TTIP controversy Page 7 TTIP controversy: what an FOI request revealed TTIP controversy Page 8 TTIP controversy: what an FOI request revealed TTIP controversy Page 9 TTIP controversy: what an FOI request revealed TTIP controversy Page 10 TTIP controversy: what an FOI request revealed TTIP controversy Page 11 TTIP controversy: what an FOI request revealed TTIP controversy Page 12 TTIP controversy: what an FOI request revealed TTIP controversy Page 13 TTIP controversy: what an FOI request revealed TTIP controversy Page 14

Under current WTO agreements, access to water is regarded as a basic human right. The new trade agreements would effectively undermine this, according to John Hilary, the executive director of War on Want, one of the campaign groups behind the report .

He claims that in a worst-case scenario, if individuals were unable to pay their water bill, they would be denied access to it.

“Suddenly, instead of water being considered a human right, it would be treated as a commodity and people could be cut off if they can’t afford it,” Mr Hilary told The Independent.

Previously, the UK Government has insisted that public services such as education and the NHS would be protected from such action.

In November last year, the UK Government published a document on the deal, Separating Myth from Fact, in which it states: “TTIP will not change the way that the NHS, or other public services, is run.

“The European Commission is following our approach that it must always be for the UK to decide for itself whether or not to open up our public services to competition.”

But Mr Hilary believes the public should be sceptical of such assurances. He said: “There is no truth in the government’s claim that public services are safe in TTIP.

“Corporate lobbyists have made sure that key services such as health, education, post, rail and water are to be opened up to the private sector, and treaties such as TTIP will lock in that privatisation for ever.

“As a result of the lobbying by these special interest groups in the services sector, it’s quite clear that public services are in the frame and any claim to the contrary is bogus.”

One of the most contentious elements of TTIP and CETA is that both deals employ a “negative list” approach.

This means that all services are open to liberalisation unless they are mentioned as an explicit exception. In TTIP there are no such exceptions listed, other than audiovisual services, which were the report says were excluded at the French government’s insistence.

In the past politicians and commissioners have said that so-called ‘carve outs’ could be used to make sure certain public services would not be open to privatisation, despite being included in the deal.

However, the report claims that such exemptions would not protect services such as the NHS.

Mr Hilary said: “The UK government and the Commission are saying even though the public sectors are in TTIP, there is still enough possibility of carving out public services.

“What this report shows categorically and unequivocally is that those claims are meaningless. There’s no truth at all in the substance of the claims that public services can be safe when they’re in TTIP.”

The report says that corporate lobbyists such as the European Services Forum and BusinessEurope have pushed for public services to be opened up to privatisation under TTIP from the start.

And it claims that education is particularly under threat: “The US is eyeing the opening up of the education market via TTIP – from management training, and language courses, to high school admission tests.”

The report was produced by War on Want alongside the anti-EU lobbying group Corporate Europe Observatory, and several trade union groups from across Europe.