1. Norby, R. J., Warren, J. M., Iversen, C. M., Medlyn, B. E. & McMurtrie, R. E. CO 2 enhancement of forest productivity constrained by limited nitrogen availability. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 19368–19373 (2010).

2. McCarthy, H. R. et al. Re-assessment of plant carbon dynamics at the Duke free-air CO 2 enrichment site: interactions of atmospheric [CO 2 ] with nitrogen and water availability over stand development. New Phytol. 185, 514–528 (2010).

3. Reich, P. B., Hobbie, S. E. & Lee, T. D. Plant growth enhancement by elevated CO 2 eliminated by joint water and nitrogen limitation. Nat. Geosci. 7, 920–924 (2014).

4. Terrer, C., Vicca, S., Hungate, B. A., Phillips, R. P. & Prentice, I. C. Mycorrhizal association as a primary control of the CO 2 fertilization effect. Science 353, 72–74 (2016).

5. Ellsworth, D. S. et al. Elevated CO 2 does not increase eucalypt forest productivity on a low-phosphorus soil. Nat. Clim. Change 320, 279–282 (2017).

6. Ainsworth, E. A. & Long, S. P. What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO 2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO 2 . New Phytol. 165, 351–372 (2005).

7. Friedlingstein, P. et al. Uncertainties in CMIP5 climate projections due to carbon cycle feedbacks. J. Clim. 27, 511–526 (2014).

8. Ciais, P. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 465–570 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

9. Zhu, Z. et al. Greening of the Earth and its drivers. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 791–795 (2016).

10. Sitch, S. et al. Recent trends and drivers of regional sources and sinks of carbon dioxide. Biogeosciences 12, 653–679 (2015).

11. Keenan, T. et al. Recent pause in the growth rate of atmospheric CO 2 due to enhanced terrestrial carbon uptake. Nat. Commun. 7, 13428 (2016).

12. Le Quéré, C. et al. Global Carbon Budget 2018. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 10, 2141–2194 (2018).

13. Campbell, J. E. et al. Large historical growth in global terrestrial gross primary production. Nature 544, 84–87 (2017).

14. Schimel, D., Stephens, B. B. & Fisher, J. B. Effect of increasing CO 2 on the terrestrial carbon cycle. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 436–441 (2015).

15. Manzoni, S., Jackson, R. B., Trofymow, J. A. & Porporato, A. The global stoichiometry of litter nitrogen mineralization. Science 321, 684–686 (2008).

16. Hoosbeek, M. R. Elevated CO 2 increased phosphorous loss from decomposing litter and soil organic matter at two FACE experiments with trees. Biogeochemistry 127, 89–97 (2016).

17. Fernández-Martínez, M. et al. Global trends in carbon sinks and their relationships with CO 2 and temperature. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 1–79 (2018).

18. Liu, Y. Y. et al. Recent reversal in loss of global terrestrial biomass. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 470–474 (2015).

19. Ter Steege, H. et al. Continental-scale patterns of canopy tree composition and function across Amazonia. Nature 443, 444–447 (2006).

20. Nasto, M. K., Winter, K., Turner, B. L. & Cleveland, C. C. Nutrient acquisition strategies augment growth in tropical N 2 fixing trees in nutrient poor soil and under elevated CO 2 . Ecology 100, e02646 (2019).

21. Cernusak, L. A. et al. Responses of legume versus nonlegume tropical tree seedlings to elevated CO 2 concentration. Plant Physiol. 157, 372–385 (2011).

22. Qie, L. et al. Long-term carbon sink in Borneo’s forests halted by drought and vulnerable to edge effects. Nat. Commun. 8, 1966 (2017).

23. Almeida Castanho, A. D. et al. Changing Amazon biomass and the role of atmospheric CO 2 concentration, climate, and land use. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 30, 18–39 (2016).

24. Soudzilovskaia, N. A. et al. Global mycorrhizal plants distribution linked to terrestrial carbon stocks. Preprint at bioRxiv https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/331884v2 (2018).

25. Hodge, A. & Storer, K. Arbuscular mycorrhiza and nitrogen: implications for individual plants through to ecosystems. Plant Soil 386, 1–19 (2015).

26. Terrer, C. et al. Ecosystem responses to elevated CO 2 governed by plant–soil interactions and the cost of nitrogen acquisition. New Phytol. 217, 507–522 (2018).

27. Peñuelas, J. et al. Human-induced nitrogen-phosphorus imbalances alter natural and managed ecosystems across the globe. Nat. Commun. 4, 2934 (2013).

28. De Kauwe, M. G., Keenan, T., Medlyn, B. E., Prentice, I. C. & Terrer, C. Satellite based estimates underestimate the effect of CO 2 fertilization on net primary productivity. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 892–893 (2016).

29. Wieder, W. R., Cleveland, C. C., Smith, W. K. & Todd-Brown, K. Future productivity and carbon storage limited by terrestrial nutrient availability. Nat. Geosci. 8, 441–444 (2015).

30. Medlyn, B. E. et al. Using ecosystem experiments to improve vegetation models. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 528–534 (2015).

31. Dieleman, W. I. J. et al. Simple additive effects are rare: a quantitative review of plant biomass and soil process responses to combined manipulations of CO 2 and temperature. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 2681–2693 (2012).

32. Baig, S., Medlyn, B. E., Mercado, L. M. & Zaehle, S. Does the growth response of woody plants to elevated CO 2 increase with temperature? A model-oriented meta-analysis. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 4303–4319 (2015).

33. Terrer, C. et al. Response to comment on ‘Mycorrhizal association as a primary control of the CO 2 fertilization effect’. Science 355, 358–358 (2017).

34. Harris, I., Jones, P. D., Osborn, T. J. & Lister, D. H. Updated high-resolution grids of monthly climatic observations—the CRU TS3.10 dataset. Int. J. Climatol. 34, 623–642 (2014).

35. Maherali, H., Oberle, B., Stevens, P. F., Cornwell, W. K. & McGlinn, D. J. Mutualism persistence and abandonment during the evolution of the mycorrhizal symbiosis. Am. Nat. 188, E113–E125 (2016).

36. Wang, B. & Qiu, Y. L. Phylogenetic distribution and evolution of mycorrhizas in land plants. Mycorrhiza 16, 299–363 (2006).

37. Stekhoven, D. J. & Buhlmann, P. MissForest—non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data. Bioinformatics 28, 112–118 (2011).

38. Van Lissa, C. J. MetaForest: exploring heterogeneity in meta-analysis using random forests. Preprint at https://psyarxiv.com/myg6s/ (2017).

39. Viechtbauer, W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software 36, 3 (2010).

40. Calcagno, V. & de Mazancourt, C. glmulti: an R package for easy automated model selection with (generalized) linear models. Journal of Statistical Software 34, 12 (2010).

41. Hedges, L. V., Gurevitch, J. & Curtis, P. S. The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology 80, 1150–1156 (1999).

42. Osenberg, C. W., Sarnelle, O., Cooper, S. D. & Holt, R. D. Resolving ecological questions through meta-analysis: goals, metrics, and models. Ecology 80, 1105–1117 (1999).

43. Rubin, D. B. & Schenker, N. Multiple imputation in health-care databases: an overview and some applications. Stat. Med. 10, 585–598 (1991).

44. Lajeunesse, M. J. Facilitating systematic reviews, data extraction and meta-analysis with the metagear package for R. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 323–330 (2016).

45. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T. & Rothstein, H. R. in Introduction to Meta-Analysis (eds Borenstein, M. et al.) 225–238 (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2009).

46. Del Re, A. C. & Hoyt, W. T. MAd: meta-analysis with mean differences. R version 0.8-2 (2014).

47. Batjes, N. H. Harmonized soil property values for broad-scale modelling (WISE30sec) with estimates of global soil carbon stocks. Geoderma 269, 61–68 (2016).

48. Post, W. M., Pastor, J., Zinke, P. J. & Stangenberger, A. G. Global patterns of soil nitrogen storage. Nature 317, 613–616 (1985).

49. Jiao, F., Shi, X.-R., Han, F.-P. & Yuan, Z.-Y. Increasing aridity, temperature and soil pH induce soil C-N-P imbalance in grasslands. Sci. Rep. 6, 19601 (2016).

50. Wang, C. et al. Aridity threshold in controlling ecosystem nitrogen cycling in arid and semi-arid grasslands. Nat. Commun. 5, 4799 (2013).

51. Zomer, R. J., Trabucco, A., Bossio, D. A. & Verchot, L. V. Climate change mitigation: a spatial analysis of global land suitability for clean development mechanism afforestation and reforestation. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 126, 67–80 (2008).

52. Billings, S. A., Schaeffer, S. M. & Evans, R. D. Trace N gas losses and N mineralization in Mojave Desert soils exposed to elevated CO 2 . Soil Biol. Biochem. 34, 1777–1784 (2002).

53. Evans, R. D. et al. Greater ecosystem carbon in the Mojave Desert after ten years exposure to elevated CO 2 . Nat. Clim. Change 4, 394–397 (2014).