1. Brienen, R. J. W. et al. Long-term decline of the Amazon carbon sink. Nature 519, 344–348 (2015).

2. Phillips, O. L. & Brienen, R. J. W. Carbon uptake by mature Amazon forests has mitigated Amazon nations’ carbon emissions. Carbon Balance Manag. 12, 1 (2017).

3. Cernusak, L. A. et al. Tropical forest responses to increasing atmospheric CO 2 : current knowledge and opportunities for future research. Funct. Plant Biol. 40, 531–551 (2013).

4. Ciais, P. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 465–570 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

5. Cox, P. M. et al. Sensitivity of tropical carbon to climate change constrained by carbon dioxide variability. Nature 494, 341–344 (2013).

6. Huntingford, C. et al. Simulated resilience of tropical rainforests to CO 2 -induced climate change. Nat. Geosci. 6, 268–273 (2013).

7. Talhelm, A. F. et al. Elevated carbon dioxide and ozone alter productivity and ecosystem carbon content in northern temperate forests. Glob. Chang. Biol. 20, 2492–2504 (2014).

8. Norby, R. J., Warren, J. M., Iversen, C. M., Medlyn, B. E. & McMurtrie, R. E. CO 2 enhancement of forest productivity constrained by limited nitrogen availability. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 19368–19373 (2010).

9. Zaehle, S. et al. Evaluation of 11 terrestrial carbon–nitrogen cycle models against observations from two temperate Free-Air CO 2 Enrichment studies. New Phytol. 202, 803–822 (2014).

10. Hofhansl, F. et al. Amazon forest ecosystem responses to elevated atmospheric CO 2 and alterations in nutrient availability: filling the gaps with model-experiment integration. Front. Earth Sci. 4, 19 (2016).

11. Norby, R. J. et al. Model-data synthesis for the next generation of forest Free-Air CO 2 Enrichment (FACE) experiments. New Phytol. 209, 17–28 (2016).

12. Lloyd, J., Bird, M. I., Veenendaal, E. M. & Kruijt, B. in Global Biogeochemical Cycles in the Climate System 95 (eds Schulze, E.-D. et al.) 95–114 (Academic, 2001).

13. Vitousek, P. M. Litterfall, nutrient cycling, and nutrient limitation in tropical forests. Ecology 65, 285–298 (1984).

14. Quesada, C. A. et al. Basin-wide variations in Amazon forest structure and function are mediated by both soils and climate. Biogeosciences 9, 2203–2246 (2012).

15. Lambers, H., Raven, J. A., Shaver, G. R. & Smith, S. E. Plant nutrient-acquisition strategies change with soil age. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 95–103 (2008).

16. Reed, S. C., Yang, X. & Thornton, P. E. Incorporating phosphorus cycling into global modeling efforts: a worthwhile, tractable endeavor. New Phytol. 208, 324–329 (2015).

17. Jiang, M., Caldararu, S., Zaehle, S., Ellsworth, D. S. & Medlyn, B. E. Towards a more physiological representation of vegetation phosphorus processes in land surface models. New Phytol. 222, 1223–1229 (2019).

18. Turner, B. L., Brenes-Arguedas, T. & Condit, R. Pervasive phosphorus limitation of tree species but not communities in tropical forests. Nature 555, 367–370 (2018).

19. Goll, D. S. et al. A representation of the phosphorus cycle for ORCHIDEE (revision 4520). Geosci. Model Dev. 10, 3745–3770 (2017).

20. Wang, Y.-P., Law, R. M. & Pak, B. A global model of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus cycles for the terrestrial biosphere. Biogeosciences 7, 2261–2282 (2010).

21. Haverd, V. et al. A new version of the CABLE land surface model (Subversion revision r4601) incorporating land use and land cover change, woody vegetation demography, and a novel optimisation-based approach to plant coordination of photosynthesis. Geosci. Model Dev. 11, 2995–3026 (2018).

22. Comins, H. N. & McMurtrie, R. E. Long-term response of nutrient-limited forests to CO 2 enrichment; equilibrium behavior of plant–soil models. Ecol. Appl. 3, 666–681 (1993).

23. Zhu, Q., Riley, W. J., Tang, J. & Koven, C. D. Multiple soil nutrient competition between plants, microbes, and mineral surfaces: model development, parameterization, and example applications in several tropical forests. Biogeosciences 13, 341–363 (2016).

24. Yang, X., Thornton, P. E., Ricciuto, D. M. & Post, W. M. The role of phosphorus dynamics in tropical forests—a modeling study using CLM-CNP. Biogeosciences 11, 1667–1681 (2014).

25. Malhi, Y. et al. Comprehensive assessment of carbon productivity, allocation and storage in three Amazonian forests. Glob. Chang. Biol. 15, 1255–1274 (2009).

26. Araújo, A. C. et al. Comparative measurements of carbon dioxide fluxes from two nearby towers in a central Amazonian rainforest: the Manaus LBA site. J. Geophys. Res. 107, 8090 (2002).

27. Quesada, C. A. et al. Soils of Amazonia with particular reference to the RAINFOR sites. Biogeosciences 8, 1415–1440 (2011).

28. Friend, A. D. et al. Carbon residence time dominates uncertainty in terrestrial vegetation responses to future climate and atmospheric CO 2 . Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3280–3285 (2014).

29. Walker, A. P. et al. Predicting long-term carbon sequestration in response to CO 2 enrichment: how and why do current ecosystem models differ? Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 29, 476–495 (2015).

30. Vitousek, P. M. Nutrient Cycling and Limitation: Hawai’i as a Model System (Princeton Univ. Press, 2004).

31. Nardoto, G. B. et al. Basin-wide variations in Amazon forest nitrogen-cycling characteristics as inferred from plant and soil 15N:14N measurements. Plant Ecol. Divers. 7, 173–187 (2014).

32. Fyllas, N. M. et al. Basin-wide variations in foliar properties of Amazonian forest: phylogeny, soils and climate. Biogeosciences 6, 2677–2708 (2009).

33. Wieder, W. R., Cleveland, C. C., Smith, W. K. & Todd-Brown, K. Future productivity and carbon storage limited by terrestrial nutrient availability. Nat. Geosci. 8, 441–444 (2015).

34. Medlyn, B. E. et al. Using models to guide field experiments: a priori predictions for the CO 2 response of a nutrient- and water-limited native eucalypt woodland. Glob. Chang. Biol. 22, 2834–2851 (2016).

35. Ellsworth, D. S. et al. Elevated CO 2 does not increase eucalypt forest productivity on a low-phosphorus soil. Nat. Clim. Chang. 7, 279–282 (2017).

36. Wright, S. J. et al. Plant responses to fertilization experiments in lowland, species-rich, tropical forests. Ecology 99, 1129–1138 (2018).

37. Warren, J. M. et al. Root structural and functional dynamics in terrestrial biosphere models—evaluation and recommendations. New Phytol. 205, 59–78 (2015).

38. Hoosbeek, M. R. Elevated CO 2 increased phosphorous loss from decomposing litter and soil organic matter at two FACE experiments with trees. Biogeochemistry 127, 89–97 (2016).

39. Yang, X., Thornton, P. E., Ricciuto, D. M. & Hoffman, F. M. Phosphorus feedbacks constraining tropical ecosystem responses to changes in atmospheric CO 2 and climate. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 7205–7214 (2016).

40. Vicca, S. et al. Fertile forests produce biomass more efficiently. Ecol. Lett. 15, 520–526 (2012).

41. Wang, Y. & Lambers, H. Root-released organic anions in response to low phosphorus availability: recent progress, challenges and future perspectives. Plant Soil https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-03972-8 (2019).

42. Gatti, L. V. et al. Drought sensitivity of Amazonian carbon balance revealed by atmospheric measurements. Nature 506, 76–80 (2014).

43. Powell, T. L. et al. Confronting model predictions of carbon fluxes with measurements of Amazon forests subjected to experimental drought. New Phytol. 200, 350–365 (2013).

44. He, M. & Dijkstra, F. A. Drought effect on plant nitrogen and phosphorus: a meta-analysis. New Phytol. 204, 924–931 (2014).

45. Quesada, C. A. et al. Variations in chemical and physical properties of Amazon forest soils in relation to their genesis. Biogeosciences 7, 1515–1541 (2010).

46. Chambers, J. Q. et al. Respiration from a tropical forest ecosystem: partitioning of sources and low carbon use efficiency. Ecol. Appl. 14, 72–88 (2004).

47. Aragão, L. E. O. C. et al. Above- and below-ground net primary productivity across ten Amazonian forests on contrasting soils. Biogeosciences 6, 2759–2778 (2009).

48. Holm, J. A., Chambers, J. Q., Collins, W. D. & Higuchi, N. Forest response to increased disturbance in the central Amazon and comparison to western Amazonian forests. Biogeosciences 11, 5773–5794 (2014).

49. Hadlich, H. L. et al. Recognizing Amazonian tree species in the field using bark tissues spectra. Ecol. Manag. 427, 296–304 (2018).

50. Kucharik, C. J. et al. Testing the performance of a dynamic global ecosystem model: water balance, carbon balance, and vegetation structure. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 14, 795–825 (2000).

51. Fisher, R. A. et al. Taking off the training wheels: the properties of a dynamic vegetation model without climate envelopes, CLM4.5(ED). Geosci. Model Dev. 8, 3593–3619 (2015).

52. Medvigy, D., Wofsy, S. C., Munger, J. W., Hollinger, D. Y. & Moorcroft, P. R. Mechanistic scaling of ecosystem function and dynamics in space and time: Ecosystem Demography model version 2. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 114, G01002 (2009).

53. Smith, B. et al. Implications of incorporating N cycling and N limitations on primary production in an individual-based dynamic vegetation model. Biogeosciences 11, 2027–2054 (2014).

54. Zaehle, S. & Friend, A. D. Carbon and nitrogen cycle dynamics in the O–CN land surface model: 1. Model description, site-scale evaluation, and sensitivity to parameter estimates. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 24, GB1005 (2010).

55. Best, M. J. et al. The joint UK land environment simulator (JULES), model description—Part 1: Energy and water fluxes. Geosci. Model Dev. 4, 677–699 (2011).

56. Farquhar, G. D., von Caemmerer, S. & Berry, J. A. A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO 2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 149, 78–90 (1980).

57. Collatz, G. J., Ball, J. T., Grivet, C. & Berry, J. A. Physiological and environmental regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration—a model that includes a laminar boundary-layer. Agric. Meteorol. 54, 107–136 (1991).

58. Kull, O. & Kruijt, B. Leaf photosynthetic light response: a mechanistic model for scaling photosynthesis to leaves and canopies. Funct. Ecol. 12, 767–777 (1998).

59. Etheridge, D. M. et al. Natural and anthropogenic changes in atmospheric CO 2 over the last 1000 years from air in Antarctic ice and firn. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 101, 4115–4128 (1996).

60. MacFarling Meure, C. et al. Law Dome CO 2 , CH 4 and N 2 O ice core records extended to 2000 years BP. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L14810 (2006).

61. Lamarque, J. F. et al. Historical (1850–2000) gridded anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of reactive gases and aerosols: methodology and application. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 7017–7039 (2010).

62. Lamarque, J. F. et al. Global and regional evolution of short-lived radiatively-active gases and aerosols in the Representative Concentration Pathways. Clim. Change 109, 191–212 (2011).

63. Wang, R. et al. Global forest carbon uptake due to nitrogen and phosphorus deposition from 1850 to 2100. Glob. Chang. Biol. 23, 4854–4872 (2017).

64. Tomasella, J. & Hodnett, M. Pedotransfer functions for tropical soils. Dev. Soil Sci. 30, 415–429 (2004).

65. Marthews, T. R. et al. High-resolution hydraulic parameter maps for surface soils in tropical South America. Geosci. Model Dev. 7, 711–723 (2014).

66. De Kauwe, M. G. et al. Where does the carbon go? A model–data intercomparison of vegetation carbon allocation and turnover processes at two temperate forest Free-Air CO 2 Enrichment sites. New Phytol. 203, 883–899 (2014).

67. Walker, A. P. et al. Comprehensive ecosystem model–data synthesis using multiple data sets at two temperate forest Free‐Air CO 2 Enrichment experiments: model performance at ambient CO 2 concentration. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 119, 937–964 (2014).