[Wikimedia-l] Who oversees the AffCom?

Actually, I'm not familiar with this specific situation as well, apart from having been informed by my affiliate that WMF had informed it I was under some sanction that probably I was unaware of, related to affiliates I was not part of and episotes I do not took part. This is an outraging, appalling and unbelievable behavior from the Wikimedia Foundation in general, and AffCom in particular. I really would like to get to the bottom of this, and more than have it reverted, I actually want to know who planted the false information about me there which led to this situation. I hope there is some way to effectively and officially demand and internal inquiry inside the Wikimedia Foundation over this situation. Best, Paulo Benjamin Ikuta <benjaminikuta at gmail.com> escreveu no dia segunda, 6/05/2019 à(s) 10:20: > > > > I'm not familiar with this specific situation, but I agree that more > transparency and accountability would be good. > > > > On May 6, 2019, at 12:40 AM, Paulo Santos Perneta <paulosperneta at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > A few days ago the Wikimedia affiliate I belong to was officially > informed, > > by a WMF source, that I'm being subject to a until now unknown sanction, > > with an accusation from AffCom I can only describe as baseless and > > fraudulent, relating to a a situation between two affiliates, dealt with > by > > AffCom more than one year ago, of which I was never part of, occurred > more > > than one year ago. I was never informed of this. > > > > This is not the first time AffCom engages in this sort of appalling > > behavior. As far as I know, WMPT is still waiting for the accusations > made > > by AffCom last year, which led to its suspension, to be substantiated. > > AffCom never substantiated anything related to that, with the excuse of a > > need for secrecy. > > > > How, I ask you all as members of the Movement, how come the Wikimedia > > Movement allowed for such a secretive, arbitrary, apparently unchecked > and > > very much powerful institution to grow and thrive like this in its > middle, > > overseeing and effectively controlling the relation of all of us (both > > affiliates and individuals) and the WMF? > > > > More important than that, what can be done about this? Where one can > appeal > > to, when presented with such fraudulent, baseless, secretive, > > unsubstantiated accusations by a body which was supposed to be above all > > suspicion? > > > > Can an internal inquiry be demanded somewhere at the Wikimedia Foundation > > over the activities and decisions of AffCom, in the same way we do with > > suspicious activity by checkusers and supervisors, with the Ombudsman > > Commission? > > > > Looking forward for any help and insight on this, > > > > Paulo - DarwIn > > Wikimedia Portugal > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request at lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l > New messages to: Wikimedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request at lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>