Skip to comments.

Jena 6 case caught up in whirlwind of distortion, opportunism

Kansas City Star ^ | Sep. 29, 2007 | JASON WHITLOCK

Posted on by neverdem

JENA, La. | Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and talk-show hosts certainly feasted on the racial unrest in this tiny central Louisiana town.

But it would be unfair to claim they threw the match that ignited the Jena Six case into a global blaze of hostility and misinformation.

That distinction belongs to Alan Bean, a 54-year-old white, self-proclaimed Baptist minister from Tulia, Texas.

Do I know him? was LaSalle Parish District Attorney Reed Walters sarcastic and dismissive response when I asked about Bean during a 45-minute interview.

People are reluctant to say it, said Craig Franklin, editor of the Jena Times, but there is no doubt that Alan Bean created all of this.

This is different things to different people. To some, this is a long overdue civil-rights reawakening, which points out pervasive racism in the South and in our justice system. To others, this is a horrific public-relations crime against the white people of Jena and irreparable damage to race relations in the poor oil town. And to some dispassionate observers, this is an unfortunate situation being exploited by white and black racial extremists.

On Sept. 20, when Jackson, Sharpton and Jena Six family members led competing rallies in support of six black youths accused of brutally attacking a white classmate, this  more than 20,000 marchers  was something no one in Jena could ever imagine.

But Alan Bean could.

Bean  the creator of Friends of Justice, an organization primarily dedicated to helping poor minorities victimized by our justice system  had warned prominent members of the Jena community as early as January that the town would be painted as racist by the national media if Walters didnt back down.

I told them I was going to bring media attention to this situation, and it was likely the same thing would happen to them that happened to my little hometown, Bean said by phone on Friday. Tulia got a bad rap, a rap it probably didnt deserve. But the media doesnt do its job. Its in the entertainment business.

Tulia refers to the case that made Bean and Friends of Justice a player in the world of American criminal justice. In the late 1990s, Bean exposed a corrupt cop in his hometown. More than a dozen drug convictions against minorities were overturned because of Beans work. Tulia was labeled as racist, and Bean became the person to call if you thought the police and/or a prosecutor were exploiting you.

A lawyer in New Orleans put Bean and parents of the Jena Six in contact with each other in December. Within three months, Bean had researched Jena and the events surrounding the assault, and published a 5,400-word narrative titled The Making of a Myth in Jena, Louisiana and a 2,400-word, media-friendly narrative titled Responding to the Crisis in Jena, Louisiana.

These two pro-defense narratives form the outline for most of the worlds understanding of the case. Bean connected the December assault on Justin Barker to the September noose hangings, to Reed Walters infamous I can ruin your life with the stroke of a pen statement at a hastily called school assembly, and to separate off-campus confrontations between Robert Bailey and white men on the Friday and Saturday before the attack on Barker.

Walters said Wednesday hed never heard that the attack on Barker had anything to do with the noose hangings until the defense filed motions in the spring to recuse him from the case.

Bean said he first spoon-fed his narratives to Tom Mangold of the BBC because Mangold had worked with Bean on the Tulia drug cases. The BBC filmed a documentary on the Jena Six titled Race Hate in Louisiana. Bean said he then gave the Jena Six story to newspaper reporter Howard Witt of the Chicago Tribune, which published a similar story on May 20.

I put it in the hands of people I knew would do a good job with the story, Bean said.

Bean also gave his story to a blogger, Jordan Flaherty, and a law professor, Bill Quigley. From all of these sources the story mushroomed and became fact.

The Jena Six beat up Justin Barker because they were still angry about the lack of sufficient punishment given to white kids who hung nooses on a whites-only shade tree, and the six were railroaded by an overzealous district attorney who failed to properly prosecute white men who viciously assaulted Robert Bailey and later pulled a shotgun on Bailey and two others at a convenience store.

Walters, police investigators, school officials and some Jena residents say Beans story is hogwash. There is at least some legitimacy to those claims. Beans story and subsequent posts on his Web site contain factual errors.

The three kids responsible for hanging the nooses were given more punishment than just a few days of in-school suspension. They went to an alternative school for nine days and received two weeks of in-school suspension, LaSalle Parish school superintendent Roy Breithaupt said.

But more than the factual errors, Beans story is framed  by his own admission  as an indictment of the criminal justice system and the people in power in Jena and, therefore, the story is unfairly biased. Bean never examined the other forces at work that contributed to the Jena Six assault and Walters heavy-handed approach to justice as it relates to the alleged perpetrators.

I didnt know, Bean said when asked whether he knew of defendant Mychal Bells violent juvenile history when he was crafting his narratives. I never talked to Mychals family, and I never talked to Mychal. He was in jail. I knew he had a history for getting into trouble. I knew he was a kid at a crossroads.

Bean also didnt know that in fall 2006, Bell, who 16 at the time, was living with his then-18-year-old best friend John McPherson and McPhersons then-16-year-old wife, Ashley, in a three-bedroom trailer. The McPhersons are white. Bell is the godfather to their 18-month-old daughter.

Bean has a very idealistic view of the Jena defendants.

These are fun-loving, impetuous, athletically gifted black males that dont drink and dont smoke, and they go to church as well, he told me.

The church-going contention flies in the face of what Rev. Jimmy Ray Young, pastor at L&A Baptist Church, said Wednesday.

None of these boys have been in church except when Al Sharpton was in town, Young complained. Ive told the ministers we need to get these boys back in church.

Walters claims that Bean and the media have distorted other key elements in the case.

Bean reported that Walters directed his stroke of the pen remark at black students when the school called an assembly to quell protests of the noose hangings. Some pro-Jena Six chain e-mails create the impression that Walters met privately with black students and threatened them. Not true, Walters and police say.

Paul Smith, Jenas chief of police, says he and sheriffs investigator Jimmy Arbogast called Walters to the school after a student took a swing at Smith when he was breaking up a fight between students.

Tensions were high. Everybody was upset, Arbogast said. We wanted Reed to explain to them that, Hey, look, you have to think for a minute. Look what age you are. Yall are in high school. 

Flanked by Arbogast and Smith, Walters addressed the entire student body. He said he began by telling the students about an aggravated rape case (possible death penalty) that he was considering.

Walters recalls saying:  I can be your best friend or your worst enemy. With the stroke of a pen I can make life miserable on you or ruin your life. So I want you to call me before you do something stupid. That last part doesnt get reported. It doesnt make good press.

Bean also wrote that three days before the Jena Six assault a white man, Matt Windham, pulled a shotgun on Bailey and two others. He wrote that they wrestled the gun away from the man and ran off, and that Walters charged them with a crime rather than the white man.

The police contend that Windham  not the boys  called the police, claimed the boys threatened him, chased him back to his vehicle and wrestled his gun away. The police also say that two uninvolved female witnesses backed Windham, and thats why the boys were charged.

Bean also mischaracterized the simple battery that Bailey suffered at the Fair Barn party four days before the attack on Barker, according to Walters, police, several witnesses and Baileys statements to police.

Robert Bailey Jr. was attacked by a savage white mob at a local dance, Bean wrote. True, he wasnt knocked unconscious  but that is just a matter of aim and good fortune. He was punched, he was kicked, and he was smacked over the head with a beer bottle (and hes got the scars to prove it).

Walters, who prosecuted Baileys lone attacker (Justin Sloan), said there was no mob attack. It was simply a dispute at the door of a mixed-race, invitation-only party that Bailey was denied access to.

It wasnt a fight, Walters said. Robert Bailey didnt swing. He didnt do anything. The kid hit him, knocked him down. No beer bottle, no anything. There was no statement of the victim at that time indicating any weapon was used. The defendant (Sloan) was arrested on a simple battery. He was prosecuted on a simple battery. He pled guilty to a simple battery.

It was only after the fact that I learned that a beer bottle was involved, that stitches were involved, Walters continued. And I checked after the fact with my local hospital: Did this happen? The information (about a beer bottle) came up in a motion to recuse me from the current charges. Thats the first time Id heard about that.

Ironically, Bean is now growing frustrated with the way the case has turned, particularly since Jackson and Sharpton got involved. He said they wouldnt return his calls. He indicated there was a riff between the Bailey (Bean camp) and Bell (Sharpton camp) families.

People in Jena say the feud is over money. The families are handling the donations to the Jena Six defense fund. Robert Bailey recently posted and took down MySpace photos of himself and another Jena Six defendant with wads of $100 bills stuffed in their mouths and splashed across their bodies.

I can tell you there is no misappropriation of the funds, said Bean, adding he was not being paid for his services. Ive been there and seen them handling the checks. Where Robert got his hands on that money, I dont know. Hes a kid. It was a stupid thing to do.

As for Beans thoughts on Jackson and Sharpton?

Im not at all comfortable with the way this has been handled by the Jackson and Sharpton folks, Bean said. Whats wrong is that Jesse and Al have tried to turn this into an old civil-rights story in which Mychal Bell emerges like Rosa Parks, and thats not right. These guys (Jackson and Sharpton) have lost their gravitas, lost their credibility. People are really tired of the same old 1960s shtick.

Based on the crowds in Jena on Sept. 20, Im not so sure.

To reach Jason Whitlock, call 816-234-4869 or send e-mail to jwhitlock@kcstar.com.



TOPICS:

Crime/Corruption

Editorial

News/Current Events

Politics/Elections

KEYWORDS:

6haters

6racialhaters

6racists

6thugs

jena

jena6

jenasix

louisiana



Jason Whitlock

Jason Whitlock

To: neverdem

A voice of sanity... and truth. Truth is poison to the scum-bag media and their comrades on the left.



by 2 posted onby johnny7 ("But that one on the far left... he had crazy eyes")

To: neverdem

A homerun by Jason Whitlock. That distinction belongs to Alan Bean, a 54-year-old white, self-proclaimed Baptist minister from Tulia, Texas. Self-proclaimed? This Bean character sounds like something of a self-promoter.



by 3 posted onby puroresu (Enjoy ASIAN CINEMA? See my Freeper page for recommendations.)

To: neverdem

I have been reading and following J Whitlock. Good luck my man I am sorry that facts and reality are going to destroy you. BTW Jason, for those of you who don't know, is not an uncle Tom, he is a no holds barred original journalist. He tells it like it is no BS. Man is he going to get crucified. If ur reading this Jason I love you on Jim Rome.It’s about time for your own nationally syndicated show I would be there everyday.



by 4 posted onby VaRepublican (I would propagate tag lines but I don't know how...)

To: neverdem

by 5 posted onby TornadoAlley3 ( An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping that it will eat him last..)

To: neverdem

Dennis Prager needs to have this fellow on his show to explain the whole thing and why it’s not what it appears to be. How it was stretched and stretched by journalists, race-baiters and lawyers to “fit the template.”



by 6 posted onby TenthAmendmentChampion (Global warming is to Revelations as the theory of evolution is to Genesis.)

To: TornadoAlley3

Thanks for the link.



by 7 posted onby neverdem (Call talk radio. We need a Constitutional Amendment for Congressional term limits. Let's Roll!)

To: neverdem

Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton—When you see the clowns, you know the circus is in town.



by 8 posted onby attiladhun2 (Islam is a despotism so vile that it would warm the heart of Orwell's Big Brother)

To: neverdem

“Alan Bean-leader of the Texas auxillary of the Westboro Baptist Church of Kansas”-Right said Fred (Phelps). Like Sharpton and Jackson, just a bunch of publicity hounds!



by 9 posted onby getarope (The best weapon for the Presidential campaign is a THOMPSON!)

To: neverdem

Whitlock is the only guy at the KC Star who deviates from the standard PC line of BS that is typical of most big city newspapers these days. It’s mildly ironic that he’s “only” a sports columnist.



To: neverdem; AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...

Thanks neverdem.



by 11 posted onby SunkenCiv (Profile updated Wednesday, September 27, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)

To: neverdem

Great article!



To: neverdem; abb; alnick; AzaleaCity5691; bayourant; BerniesFriend; Bitsy; bigeasy_70118; Bogey780; ...

*Louisiana Ping List If you would like on or off the Louisiana Ping list please FReepmail me and your name will be added or taken off of the list.



To: CajunConservative

What the centrist should do is conduct a poll amoung black Americans asking the following questions: 1. Where would you prefer to live as an average citizen, Europe or Africa? 2. Within the last 400 years, which governments established a relatively high quality of life for its citizens, European or African? 3. Which continent has had slavery throughout its history and where slavery still exists, Europe or Africa? 4. In which continent do people die by the thousands every year to leave due to unliveable conditions, Europe or Africa? 5. As an American, which continent best describes your values, Europe or Africa? 6. Which political party promotes the values of Africa in America for black Americans, Republican or Democratic? 7. Which political party promotes the values of Europe in America for black Americans, Republican or Democratic? 8. Which values do Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton promote for black Americans, European or African? 9. Which values should black American’s have, European or African? 10. Which values should white Americans have, European or African? I tend to think Hispanics and Asians have a better work ethic and subsequently enjoy a better quality of life in America because they value America more than their native countries. Black Americans simply dont and that is the real elephant in the living room! The long term trend will probably be that most black American’s lives will resemble that of Gypsies (and my wife’s family is a well-to-do Gypsy family with European values) in eastern and northern Europe. Viva España para yo y mi familia!



by 14 posted onby kipita (Conservatives: Freedom and Responsibility------Liberals: Freedom from Responsibility)

To: neverdem

Robert Bailey Jr. was attacked by a savage white mob at a local dance, This quote appears in a blog entry 9-25-07, Why the liberal media doesnt get Jena Basically the DA was right at the point where he decided to not appeal to the LA Supreme Court. The quote would have no effect in inflaming the situation more or any actual input by that time. The Reed Walters quote below about the Beer bottle in the Bailey assault leaves some doubt about whether a bottle was used or not. If Walters actually went to the trouble of checking with the hospital, why isn't he saying one way or the other if Bailey got stitched. If there was no record of Bailey getting such treatment it would reinforce the account of the Bailey assault in the first paragraph below. It wasnt a fight, Walters said. Robert Bailey didnt swing. He didnt do anything. The kid hit him, knocked him down. No beer bottle, no anything. There was no statement of the victim at that time indicating any weapon was used. The defendant (Sloan) was arrested on a simple battery. He was prosecuted on a simple battery. He pled guilty to a simple battery. It was only after the fact that I learned that a beer bottle was involved, that stitches were involved, Walters continued. And I checked after the fact with my local hospital: Did this happen? The information (about a beer bottle) came up in a motion to recuse me from the current charges. Thats the first time Id heard about that.



Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

FreeRepublic , LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794

FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson