Right-Wing Rep. Matt Krause is Undeterred by Economic Backlash in North Carolina

Despite economic backlash over House Bill 2 in North Carolina, one right-wing Texas lawmaker wants to write anti-LGBT discrimination into the state Constitution.Â

And Republican Gov. Greg Abbott is signaling that he would sign the measure if it passes the House and Senate.Â

Texas already has a strong Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), which prohibits the government form substantially burdening a person’s free exercise of religion unless it has a compelling interest.Â

GOP Rep. Matt Krause (shown above with Sen. Ted Cruz, whom he supports for president) is an attorney who previously worked for Liberty Counsel, an anti-LGBT hate group, and hasÂ compared gays to Nazis. Last year, Krause authoredÂ a proposal to remove the word “substantially” from the law, and enshrine it in the Constitution. Now, in the wake of overwhelming opposition from businesses to anti-LGBT bills in North Carolina and Georgia, Krause is vowing to introduce his proposed amendment to the state constitution when the Texas Legislature meets again in 2017. Only one other state in the nation, Alabama, has an RFRA in its Constitution.Â

â€œNobody should be forced to go against their conscience or religious beliefs,â€ Krause told The Austin Statesman.Â

Gov. Abbott’s press secretary, John Wittman,Â told the Statesman: â€œTo imply that religious liberty cannot be protected without hurting a businessâ€™ bottom line is inherently false and goes against the principles our country was founded on. Gov. Abbott has always sought to protect and expand religious liberty and economic freedom in Texas, and he looks forward to continuing that work in the 85th legislative session.â€

In addition to sanctioning anti-LGBT discrimination, experts say Krause’s measure would open the door to a host of unintended consequences,Â such as domestic abusers using it as a defense to criminal charges; medical professionals refusing to provide life-saving treatments based on their beliefs; and workers being fired for violating the tenets of an employerâ€™s faith.Â

â€œA lot of lawyers would say that the word â€˜substantialâ€™ has some real meaning to it, and that droppingÂ it means that youâ€™re going to give any litigant the right to say, â€˜I feel burdened,â€™ and that will be that with regard to forcing the state to show the compellingÂ interest,â€ said Sanford Levinson, a law professor at the University of Texas. â€œIf thatâ€™s not what youâ€™re out to do, then Iâ€™m not sure what the point ofÂ the amendment would be, becauseÂ the state RFRA seems to be quite strong, so why do we need this?â€Â

The Texas Association of Business, the state’s chamber of commerce, opposed Krause’s measure last year and is already speaking out against any potential anti-LGBT legislation in 2017.Â

â€œWe certainly donâ€™t want Texas to appear to be unwelcoming for future talent, and thatâ€™s what I think weâ€™ll get if something like North Carolinaâ€™s bill is taken up by our Legislature,â€ TAB President Chris Wallace told The Texas Observer.Â

Seven hundred of the state’s employers, including 30 from the Fortune 500, have joined the pro-LGBT coalition Texas Competes.Â

“In how many states does this have to happen before it becomes clear that legislation that goes this far, that extremist legislation that specifically targets LGBT people for discrimination, is something that has negative consequences from an economic and a business standpoint?” said Chuck Smith, executive director of Equality Texas.Â

Â

Image via FacebookÂ