Voters strongly support requiring that agencies get a warrant before searching through their personal data.

As the major political parties work to impose Australia’s biggest ever mass surveillance scheme on citizens, new polling from Essential Research shows the majority of voters want law enforcement and security agencies to get a warrant in order to obtain their data.

Cowed by a media industry backlash, politicians from both major parties rushed last week to stitch up a deal to amend the government’s data retention bill to require that agencies obtain a warrant if they want to access journalists’ metadata in order to identify a source. The warrant process will be shrouded in secrecy — anyone revealing an effort to obtain a warrant, or the existence of a warrant, will be jailed for two years, and both the judge issuing the warrant and the “public interest advocate” arguing against it will be handpicked by the government — but nonetheless it imposes special requirements that will not apply to the data of ordinary citizens.

And while 10% of voters support a special requirement for journalists’ information, most voters want a warrant requirement for everyone.

Interestingly, support is strong despite voting intention. Coalition voters — who tend to be older and less IT-literate — more strongly support data retention and surveillance, but even half of them support a general warrant requirement.

There is no substantial reason why there should not be a general warrant requirement for the 300,000 telephone and internet data requests made each year by a wide variety of agencies. Police agencies insist the workload and resource requirements would be too burdensome, but a number of countries (Denmark, Spain, Finland, for example) have judicial warrant requirements for communications data; other countries like France don’t allow police to obtain data by themselves, but require that they convince a prosecutor of the need for it first.

In any event, under the government’s amendments re journalists, sources can still be hunted down if agencies don’t target journalists — and if ASIO wants to hunt down a source, it does not even need to get a warrant.

Thanks for signing up We look forward to seeing you bright and early with your need-to-know talking points and tidbits for the day ahead. Get Crikey FREE to your inbox every weekday morning with the Crikey Worm. Please enter your email address Sign up