Image copyright Getty Images

London Bridge attacker Usman Khan attended two counter-terrorism programmes that had not been fully tested to see if they were effective, BBC News has discovered.

Khan, who was convicted of a terrorism offence in 2012, killed Jack Merritt, 25, and Saskia Jones, 23, on Friday.

He had completed two rehabilitation schemes during the eight years he spent in prison and following his release.

The government says such programmes are kept "under constant review".

Three others were injured after Khan launched the attack at a prisoner rehabilitation event inside Fishmongers' Hall near London Bridge.

Inquests into the deaths of Mr Merritt and Ms Jones were opened and adjourned at the Old Bailey on Wednesday.

The court heard that both of them died after being stabbed in the chest. The date for the full inquests is still to be decided.

City of London senior coroner Alison Hewitt also opened and adjourned the inquest into Khan, who died from multiple gunshot wounds after being shot by police.

The inquest heard that Khan had been at the venue to participate in group workshops.

During his time in prison, Khan completed a course for people convicted of extremism offences and after his release went on a scheme to address the root causes of terrorism.

The first course Khan went on, the Healthy Identity Intervention Programme, was piloted from 2010 and is now the main rehabilitation scheme for prisoners convicted of offences linked to extremism.

Image copyright West Midlands Police Image caption Usman Khan had been jailed in 2012

Last year, the Ministry of Justice published the findings of research into the pilot project which found it was "viewed positively" by a sample of those who attended and ran the course.

However, the department has not completed any work to test whether the scheme prevents reoffending or successfully tackles extremist behaviour.

There has also been no evaluation of the impact of the Desistance and Disengagement Programme, which Khan took part in after his release last year.

Media playback is unsupported on your device Media caption What happened at London Bridge?

Government officials pointed out that the schemes have not been operating for long enough for the results to be assessed, but a spokesperson said all offender behaviour programmes were kept under constant review.

The spokesperson said: "All our offender behaviour programmes are monitored, evaluated and kept under constant review to ensure that they are effective in reducing reoffending and protecting the public."

Experimental schemes

The Home Office "fact-sheet" on the Desistence and Disengagement programme contains eight pieces of "key information".

But it omits the really key bit - that the programme has never been evaluated. In other words, we do not know if it works.

The same is true of the Healthy Identity Interventions course. Although the Ministry of Justice conducted a "process evaluation", to check the pilot version was being run properly, we will not know for another two years if it is achieving results.

So, these schemes, like many other offender behaviour projects, are, in essence, experimental.

Some say the only way of knowing if they are any good is to try them out. Others argue the risks of doing that are too high, pointing to the once-flagship Sex Offender Treatment Programme, which was used for 25 years until research showed that it increased the likelihood of reoffending.

Rehabilitating convicted terrorists is as complex and challenging as it gets - but a little more openness and honesty is required about the methods that are being used.

A man who recently went through the same Desistence and Disengagement programme as Khan says the London Bridge attacker "shouldn't have been let out of prison".

The man - who asked to remain anonymous - was acquitted of terror charges but was required to wear an electronic tag.

Media playback is unsupported on your device Media caption Legal correspondent Clive Coleman looks at why Usman Khan was freed from prison

Speaking to Sima Kotecha on BBC Radio 4's Today programme, he said: "I had a mentor who came to see me at least twice a week.

"As time went on the authorities saw a change within myself."

Asked why such mentoring worked for him but not for Khan, the man said: "I wanted to make a change.

"Other people may think that [terror] is the only route because they've been radicalised and that's all they know."

He added that "anybody can manipulate" when asked whether people could convince their mentors that they have moved away from extremism.

He said: "I don't know his character, but anybody can manipulate."

Khan, 28, was arrested in December 2010 and sentenced in 2012 to indeterminate detention for public protection with a minimum jail term of eight years, having pleaded guilty to preparing terrorist acts.

He had been part of an al-Qaeda inspired group that considered attacks in the UK, including at the London Stock Exchange.

In 2013 the Court of Appeal quashed the sentence, replacing it with a 16-year fixed term, and ordered Khan to serve at least half this - eight years - behind bars.

Since his release from prison in December 2018, Khan had been living in Stafford and was required to wear a GPS tag.

Image copyright PA Media

Khan was armed with two knives and was wearing a fake suicide vest during the attack at Fishmongers' Hall in the City of London on Friday.

He was tackled by members of the public, including ex-offenders from the conference, before he was shot dead by police.

Porter 'acted instinctively'

Among those praised for their bravery during the attack was a porter - known as Lukasz - who tried to fight Khan at Fishmongers' Hall.

He issued a statement through Scotland Yard on Tuesday, saying that contrary to some reports, he had used a pole to tackle Khan while someone else used a narwhal tusk.

"The man attacked me, after which he left the building," he said. "A number of us followed him out but I stopped at the bollards of the bridge. I had been stabbed and was later taken to hospital to be treated."

He said he was "thankful" that he had now returned home.

"When the attack happened, I acted instinctively," he said. "I am now coming to terms with the whole traumatic incident and would like the space to do this in privacy, with the support of my family."

He wanted to express his condolences to the families who had "lost precious loved ones", he added, as well as sending his best wishes to "everyone affected by this sad and pointless attack".

Two women were also injured in the attack. They remain in a stable condition in hospital.