Recent Articles

GlobaloneyWarming Science Fiction A cult of the ineffably stupid World Temperature record, at least in the modern era, using standard temperature equipment and confirmed and affirmed as the hottest day ‘ever’, was July 10th 1913 in Death Valley- 134 F. The 1880s, 1910s, 1930s were much hotter than today. Co2 levels were much lower. There has been a cooling trend since the 1880s.

According to Climate Fiction, today, or tomorrow, or next week, is the hottest day on record with an inexorable incline of temperature from ‘civilisation’ and ‘emissions’. Stupid is not science. These same non-scientists of the warming-cult have failed in every major prediction since the 1980s. The Arctic ‘will disappear’ fraud is still a work-in-progress and will assuredly happen (the cult tells us), eventually. This is just one of many failed prognostications. Plant food the secular religion demon of note, is .04% of atmospheric gas by weight, with 95% emitted by natural processes, is necessary for life and oxygen. The human expulsion of 5% of the .04% cannot mathematically, or scientifically cause anything. As with oxygen, hydrogen, nitrogen, Co2 falls out of complex convection systems. A trace chemical cannot cause anything. Use your own brain.

Cults Of Ignorance. Tearing down History. Non Whites are absolved of all historical crimes. Fake News. Fake Education to blame.

Black Lives Matter in Canada, co-joined with fascists Anti-fa self-loathing half-wits tearing down Canadian statues and in particular Sir John A MacDonald who was Canada’s first Prime Minister, the most important leader in the improbable creation of a country stretching from ‘sea to shining sea’, the second largest nation on the planet, blessed with resources, historical legacy and until recently, culture. According to the usual cadre of ignorant half-wits, Sir John A and 19th century Canadians were racists, who generated a genocide against the ‘first peoples’ of the land. These indigenous ‘Indians’ are now portrayed as native multi-culturalists, urbane, wise, sophisticated, in communion with nature, noble, dignified and superior. In actual fact, the ‘natives’ were living some 7000 years in arrears of the hated-White man. Endless wars, child sacrifices, slavery, early death, pestilence and a distinct lack of society, laws, technology, learning or even a modicum of science, medicine and learning were the realities. In the real world, advanced civilisations crush less advanced. This is a basic fact. There is nothing resembling ‘cultural parity’, nor the insipid and immoral declaration by the multi-culturalists that all cultures are equal. This is absurd. Canada is routinely described by many as a ‘great country’. Compared to what existed in 1500 it most certainly is. Whites hacked out of a wilderness a modern nation state. They defeated the inhabitants. What to do with the natives was and is a complex problem. The 19th century Canadians did the best they could. Revising history and ascribing ‘racism’ to a Prime Minister who helped create such a grand experiment as Canada is obtuse and deeply psychotic. Are the same assertions of ‘racism’ and genocide applied to the Iroquois who annihilated the Hurons and Algonquins in a tribal genocide? Are the endless wars between tribes described as ‘racism’ and genocide when innocents including women and children were raped, enslaved and killed in their thousands? The Fake News, the Fake Education, the Marxist rewriting of reality will lead to the very dismemberment of the system, that grants these idiots, the wealth, the luxury, the time and the tools to pull down statues and topple civilisation.

Truly the Age of Stupid Communism in many forms only uses force and propaganda. Truly the age of the hysterical and stupid. As Western Civilisation implodes, committing suicide, the abettors of this grand experiment in social decline applaud themselves as insufferably brilliant, scientists, moral, superior to anything in the past, beatific in their visions of justice, social harmony and the hatred of Whites. Devoid of religion, they replace their spiritual emptiness with cults such as Corona and Covid, Globaloneywarming, Evolution, abiogenesis, Cosmology and Star Wars.

Michael Crichton and the Age of Ignorance parading as Science Everyone is a scientist.... What is science? Is it the metaphysical hand-waving of evolution? The outright fraud and nonsense of globaloneywarming? Wear a mask to stop a virus? DNA formed in a soupy pond near to Chuckie’s house in Sussex? Piltdown man? Life on Venus? Dark Matter? The science fiction of multi-universes, pregnant universes, impregnated by black holes and the whole universe suffused with the never proven 'dark matter' is science? Good grief. It should embarrass a 10 year old. Michael Crichton (1942–2008), who had a previous career in medicine and science, said: “Let’s be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus. “There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it’s science, it isn’t consensus. Period. Past dominant paradigms which were entirely fallacious and were little more than hand-waving philosophy included: Epicycles : Belief that planetary rotations were perfectly circular and that the planets themselves were also a perfectly circular shape. Phlogiston : A magic substance which explained how substances burned or became rusted. It does not exist. Geocentricity : It appeared that the Earth is stationary and therefore the planets by default must circle around the stationary Earth. Earth does not rotate : The somewhat common-sense observation that objects did not fly off the surface of the Earth led philosophers and scientists to assume that the Earth did not move. If it did, it was reasoned, no object would stay fastened to the surface. They would spin off. Alchemy : Turning lead or some other base metal into gold. Whilst it is possible to create a gold leaf or gold shavings, material and physical properties do not change their composition from one material to another [this includes the melting of minerals to create for eg steel]. Humours : 4 basic fluids in the body corresponded to 4 basic 'humours' or moods. The idea was to keep these in balance. Such a paradigm retarded real medicine by millennia. Spontaneous generation : Scientific consensus during the 'Enlightenment' held that mice and other rodents appeared from dirt, garbage, old shirts and dung. Abiogenesis : Evolution maintains that life originated from non-matter, and that all life has non-life origins. This is patently absurd. It also maintains magic – the wolf became the whale, a reptilian scale became a feather, the entire complexity of DNA, the brain, blood flow, chemicals, and life itself all arose from ‘selection’, chance and of course from Father Time. Life on the moon : The 'lunatics' were a group of famous astronomers who in the 19th century adamantly upheld that the moon had life. Life on Mars: In the early 20th century Mars was deemed to be a planet with a similar climate as the Earth's. Fictitious 'canals' and other 'proofs' of civilization were constructed. It is of course dead cold. Life on Venus: In the 1940s and early 50s the consensus was that Venus was the Earth's sister planet with a similar atmosphere and a good chance at having life. Venus is a red hot hell with a surface temp of 1000 F. It was Venus with its 95% Co2 atmosphere [vs the Earth's 4/100 of 1 %]...which gave rise to the scam of 'the greenhouse effect'... There is no settled science. There is no science when the theory is unproven, untested, and when it contains more philosophy and metaphysics than hard facts. So much for rationality and an 'age of reason' for any who argue the contrary.

C.S. Lewis and 'The Abolition of Man' by Steve Turley Natural law is not optional



Turley’s short work is founded on lectures explaining C.S. Lewis’ opus ‘The Abolition of Man’ to the modern ear, interpreting prescience to the secular religious devotee, devoted as most are to technology, government and self-obsessions of various hues. Today’s secular religion has little patience for faith, spiritual development, rationality, or consistency in standards and appraisals. Lewis expected and predicted the carnage which follows when Western society jettisons its Christian heritage and foundation, a process he discerned with alarm 90 years ago. So today the Western world writhes in agony with a government sponsored ‘pandemic’, societal closure, anti-White racist violence (BLM and anti-Fa); and a river of Fake News and Fake Science. Rejecting reality and Western Christian civilisation has consequences. What does Lewis mean by the abolition of man? Lewis argues that because we have self-consciously left the world of value and virtue in favor of a world of science and technology, we have left a very definite definition of what it meant to be human for another definition of our humanity, or what Lewis might call post-humanity. Speaking of this new race, Lewis writes: “It is not that they are bad men. They are not men at all. Stepping outside the Tao, they have stepped into the void. Nor are their subjects necessarily unhappy men. They are not men at all: they are artefacts. Man’s final conquest has proved to be the abolition of Man.” Lewis knew that serving the Mammon Gods of Science and Technology would lead to strife and dehumanisation. Technology used to control and manipulate. Science or variants of fiction which parade around as ‘science’, used as reasons to dominate and destroy. The human rendered as just another animal. The ‘experts’ elevated to God status. Mammon does not share power. Lewis recognized that technological societies succeed by convincing the masses that their highest happiness and freedom is found in their reliance on a class of experts and technicians who have the specialized competency to conform the world to their desires and ambitions. Science – much of it fake – and technology, have now replaced human relationships, privilege, morality and gratitude. Natural law theory recognizes that to be human means that we are endowed with a moral conscience which knows innately the moral order of the universe as God has created it. Natural law is not taught. It is enshrined in the American Declaration of Independence as a truism from the Middle Ages, pre-dating its explication by St. Thomas Aquinas in the 13th century. It is the basis of freedom and states that God has granted free-will and the capability of action and thought. It is up to the individual to choose wisely. Now, natural law is superseded by the ‘law of science’ and the ‘statutes of technology’. In essence ‘I post on Facebook, so therefore I am’. And when I post something that an ‘expert’ or censor does not support, the offending thought crime is briskly torn down. Now a technocratic elite will tell me what is acceptable and what is a criminal act. A moral order does not exist. What Lewis is arguing is that this cosmic piety is true for all the major worldviews of the classical world: Platonic, Aristotelian, Stoic, Christian, and Asian. Now, these cultures may work out cosmic piety differently, with different variables and constituents that are culturally specific, but the fact that humans belong to a divine moral order appears ubiquitous throughout the ancient world. Destroy natural law and the moral-God given order, and you begin to ignore reality. You now engage in pagan concepts and elevate yourself to a God. ‘Science’ cannot explain the brain nor its ‘evolution’ from nothing. Neither can ‘science’ explain morality, a consciousness, intuition, feeling or emotions. ‘Science’ cannot explain the unexplainable complexity of the human body and the natural world at large. Just saying ‘it evolved’ due to ‘natural selection’ is about as intelligent a view to describing the world as stating, ‘stuff happened and so here we are’. Yet you must pray to this and other technocratic shrines, you must attend the Church of Things-happen or ‘evolve’ (by magic); Plant-Food-causes-everything; multi-culturalism is a fact and benign; all-religion-is-bad; there-are-160-genders; or any host of religious denominations which scream and caper within the Church of ‘Science’ and Technology. the dehumanizing nature of idolatry is that we actually become what we worship. Lewis finishes The Abolition of Man with this very observation: Humanity’s obsession with conquering nature has, in fact, reduced all of humanity to mere nature. By de-humanising society and believing that we are just ‘apes’ without hair, the destruction of civilisation is just a matter of time. In an age of egoistic obsession and debt-driven material-munificence why should anyone care about C.S. Lewis? After all isn’t he just another dead-White-male, who used his White privilege to explicate philosophies which enslave non-Whites and which promote modern thought crimes and anti-‘science’? And Peter Kreeft, Professor of Philosophy at Boston College and The King’s College, considers The Abolition of Man one of six books that if read will save Western Civilization. Kreeft observes: [The Abolition of Man] is prophetic; it is couched in scholarly language; in fact, its plethora of learned Latinate references scare away even college students today, for this is the first generation in American history that is less well educated than its parents, but its content is a terrifying prophecy of mortality, not just the mortality of modern western civilization .. … but the mortality of human nature itself if we do not recapture belief in [what Lewis calls] the Tao, the natural law, the doctrine of objective values. Lewis’ doctrine of objective values based on Christianity and the natural Tao or logic of the real world. The further removed from nature, natural law, logic and Western Civilisation, the faster the decline into madness and death.

Roger Scruton: Fools, Frauds and Firebrands. Destroying 'Leftist' Philosophers Marxist-Socialist 'thinkers' have nothing intelligent or moral to say. Conservative Philosopher (recently deceased), Roger Scruton was a former academic exiled from his land due to heretical thought crimes, which offended the Marxist-Globalist Academic-Propaganda Complex. 90% of academics are Marxist-Socialist (including those who support Green Nazism or non-science such as ‘warming’). There is little free speech with academe, with most universities and most programs (many of them utterly useless); nothing more than propaganda mills for the rather illiterate and ignorant view of the Professing class. They preach a form of immoral-spirit-less religiosity and dogma, devoid of morality or intelligence. “Hence the distinction between science and ideology: my thought is science, yours is ideology; my thought is Marxist (since only Marxism penetrates the veil of ideology), yours is ‘idealist’; my thought is proletarian (Lukács), yours is bourgeois; my thought belongs to the ‘material conditions’ of production, and can be called ‘theoretical praxis’, your thought belongs to the false consciousness that arises like a cloud above the place where history is made. My thought is at work in the factory; yours is puffed from the chimney and dissolves into air.” Scruton excoriated ‘Liberals’ (Socialists, Communists, Globalists, Relativists, Humanists, Positivists – they do come with many labels); for 60 years. His crime was to live in rural England, living in the real world, connected to nature (small husbandry farm); eschewing Fake News (BBC, Sly etc); avoiding addictions (TV, Internet, Small screens); and deploying Christian faith and morality, as he regarded other philosophers and the world around him. He was persona-non-grata for Quackademia, the Fake News, the ‘Leftist’ rent-a-mob, those who are perpetually outraged, and those addicts who know little about the real world, nature or even their own human minds, brains and bodies. In Fools and Frauds he admits his thought crimes: “My previous book was published at the height of Margaret Thatcher’s reign of terror, at a time when I was still teaching in a university, and known among British left-wing intellectuals as a prominent opponent of their cause, which was the cause of decent people everywhere. The book was therefore greeted with derision and outrage, reviewers falling over each other for the chance to spit on the corpse. Its publication was the beginning of the end for my university career, the reviewers raising serious doubts about my intellectual competence as well as my moral character. This sudden loss of status led to attacks on all my writings, whether or not they touched on politics.” Today across the Western World, fascistic-terrorist groups such as Black Lives Matter (but not if you are the wrong kind of Black like say a Christian murdered by Moslems, or a Police officer killed by Blacks); Anti-fa, Extinction Rebellion, and various Moslem Jihadic groups (usually organised by the Moslem Brotherhood or ISIS); are using public violence, arson, terror and assaults to bring down the ‘structure’ of Western civilisation. This is what many youth are taught at indoctrination schools (university). To say that half-wits support these programs is only pointing out the obvious. It is only an obvious and sad fact that most of Western youth are polluted with Marxist dogma, unable to think, act reasonably, work productively, understand history and reality, and recognise the colossal ignorance of their own immoral-double standards. “Two attributes of the new order justify the pursuit of it: liberation and ‘social justice’. These correspond roughly to the liberty and equality advocated at the French Revolution, but only roughly. The liberation advocated by left-wing movements today does not mean simply freedom from political oppression or the right to go about one’s business undisturbed. It means emancipation from the ‘structures’…..Much of their literature (the Marxist prophets he exposes) is devoted to deconstructing such institutions as the family, the school, the law and the nation state through which the inheritance of Western civilization has been passed down to us.” The philosophies and polices of the ‘Left’ always lead to fascistic totalitarianism usually headed by a Leader who like many of the academic panjandrums today, has never worked, does not have a family, and never participated in nature, or civil society. It is all violence and destruction. Atheist socialists such as Hitler, Mao, Lenin, Stalin, Pol Pot (who learned his Communism in Paris from French ‘thinkers’ such as Sartre); were all committed Statists, in which various forms of statism (Communism, Fascism), would completely control society, the individual would melt into a collective and nothing would lie outside the state. None of these ‘Leftists’ had worked, engaged in normal family development, nor had any time for religious faith or spiritual development. All of them were hard-core Evolutionary-dialectical materialists. The atheist Mussolini, who did have a job as a newspaper editor for a number of years but was largely outside of ‘normal life’ as most of us would understand it, pithily described the program, now promoted by the ‘New Left’, an Atheist movement in which ‘everything is in the state’. So it is with the Atheistic ‘New Left’. Violent, intolerant, full of Newspeak, full of hate, anger, and racism (against Whites). “Marx’s ‘materialist’ theory of history was a response to Hegel, who had seen the evolution of human societies as driven by the consciousness of their members, as this is expressed in religion, morality, law and culture. Not so, Marx famously wrote. It is ‘not consciousness that determines life, but life that determines consciousness’ (The German Ideology). Life is not a conscious process occurring in the realm of ideas, but a ‘material’ reality, rooted in the needs of the organism. And the basis of social life is likewise material, involving the production, distribution and exchange of goods. Economic activity is the ‘base’ on which the ‘superstructure’ of society rests.” Marx’s theories are incredibly mindless and devoid of reality. Individuals, institutions, cultures, history, legacies, technology, markets, decisions, families, Churches, none of these exist, except to server the ‘materialist’ phase which abstractly controls all human organisation. These ‘intellectuals’, including Freud, Marcuse, Hobsbawm, Derrida, Foucault, Galbraith, and a long list of other psychologically ill, morally compromised and mentally constrained philosophers, simply ignore real life. “language, religion, custom, association and traditions of political order – in short, all those forces that absorb competing individuals into the shared identity of a nation. To identify the working class as an agent, even if ‘metaphorically’, is to ignore the true significance of national consciousness as a genuine agent of change.” And in condemning their old enemy ‘bourgeois-capitalism’ run by Whites and Jews (racism mixed with envious stupidity), there is never a real analysis done about the benefits of a system of markets, institutions, laws and free-association, only a limp hatred about the ‘structure’ which provides such flaccid humans the ability to not work, engage in mindless philosophy, or adjure their ‘proletariat’ to violence and war. “no statistics, no detailed analysis of the modern firm or its specific instances, no examination of the structure of decision making, no real comparison between the private corporation and the state monopoly and no theory of the legal personality of the corporations in a modern state. We are offered nothing more than social psychology...” Scruton eviscerates many of the modern world’s ‘philosophers’. He simply repeats what they write, showing the gibberish, illogic, the tautological statements, the circular reasoning and the abdication of thought, reason and morality in their pronouncement’s to their flock of eager half-wits, that the long pages of jargon and nothing, really mean something important, namely; the destruction of the Western state is a mission worth dying for. An Austrian Baron ‘Lukacs’, often cited by the New Left as a great thinker, is an example. “He might have noticed his own hatred of God, his refusal of trust, humility and atonement, and his overweening violence towards the created world. But he would have noticed, too, how much his ‘messianic sectarianism’ remained wedded to the deed of Sarajevo, how much the annihilating labels – ‘ideologist’, ‘nihilist’, ‘reactionary’, ‘nostalgist’ – which he threw so indiscriminately at the imaginary enemy might have been rightly attached to himself, and how much he remained to the last what he was in the beginning, a privileged remnant of a vanished ruling class.” The arrogance, the ego, the ignorance of misplaced pride, the labelling of ordinary people as categories of problems, the lack of analysis or understanding. All from yet another ‘thinker’ who never worked, never lived in reality, was disconnected from nature, humans and normal associations. “By constantly notching up the critique of American capitalism and its culture, and making only muted or dismissive references to the real nightmare of communism, those thinkers showed their profound indifference to human suffering and the unserious nature of their prescriptions.” ‘New Left’ (Globalism, Internationalism, Socialism, Communism) is a religion without spirituality. There are no ethics, morals, regulations rooted in respect for others, or for private property, individual effort, or for history, culture, and the accumulation of civilisation over 3000 years. Scruton’s books are a panacea for the age of stupid, for an era of anti-White racism, ignorance about the Moslem project, the deification of Fake News and Science Fiction. Most of the nonsense one hears can be traced back to the ‘Thinkers’ Scruton so ably destroys.

Cultural Marxism: ‘Communities’ of ‘nations’ inside a state? Another dumb idea by Marxists and Globalists in the Age of only Black Lives Matter. Buying votes. Appearing sensitive. Understanding ‘root causes’. Always ‘deeply concerned’. Supportive of cultural ‘relativity’. Active in enhancing state power. Addicted to spending more money. Increasing taxation to ensure ‘fairness’. Rejecting Western traditions. These are the ‘values’ that underlie modern day populism as expressed by all major political parties in the post-reality Western nation state. These are of course cultural Marxist concepts that if left unchecked, will destroy Western nation states. The absurdity of cultural Marxism can be illustrated in many ways. Education, the media, entertainment, the rewriting of history, unfettered non-Western immigration and the pathological hatred of the Western tradition including its Judeo-Christian roots, is endemic in the West outside of the US. Even inside the US the brain-washing of youth, the imposition of immoral relativity and low standards in TV, music and Hollywood, and the constant populism emanating from cultural Marxist political warriors has deeply warped the US psyche and forced the US into a severe leftwards drift that threatens its very existence as a nation state. Outside of America the advance of cultural Marxism is even more profound. [see Sartre, Foucault, Hobsbawm etc]. Consider the nuttiness of this idea. You have a state but in good cultural Marxist fashion you need to reject the 3000-year Western cultural heritage. Thus, you demand the equal importance of all ‘cultures’. This is cultural relativity. Just to make sure that no-one gets left out you need to highlight various ‘communities’, within these distinct cultures or ‘nations’, within some political and economic construct called the ‘state’. This is the multi-cultural Marxist mantra of relativity taken to extremes. It is foolish and dangerous. In order to demolish the Western nation state cultural Marxists need to eradicate the Judeo-Christian ideals and philosophies from existence, and divorce current and future populations from their past heritage. Therefore, in Canada or in Europe the once majoritarian culture is now nothing more than just another expression of reality. These successful nations have a culture that is no better than say Islamic culture, or the various Asian, African or Latin expressions of reality. The fact that the Western European model of development is the most moral and successful in mankind is rewritten by the cultural Marxist fetishists as nothing more than a catalogue of rape, racism, plunder and criminality. Buying votes also mandates the division of society into little cultural Marxist groups. Want the Chinese vote? Pander to the Chinese community within the nation citing supposed grievances, racism, intolerance and other victimology claims. Need that French vote? Satisfy and emulsify their emotional immaturity and swaggering arrogance with references to cultural superiority and uniqueness. Need some Muslim money? Cry that Islam is peaceful, and more mosques are needed so we become accepting of Islam’s wonderful civilization. Thus the idea that we only have ‘ethnic communities’, within racially defined ‘nations’, inside of something called a ‘state’ takes ferverish hold of the cultural Marxist and vote buying elite. What better way to rewrite history then to ignore it and embrace the relativity model that all blood lines, races, ethnicities are actually nations within a larger group? If that is true then the nation does not exist – it is just a state controlled empire. But destroying a successful history, culture and heritage is unimportant when faced with buying votes and appearing sensitive and culturally hip. So you have ‘conservatives’ droning on about the ‘Quebecer’ nation within a nation. What next? Will there be a Hindu nation of Canada? Or a Portugese one? How about mixed bloodlines? Are you still part of the Quebecer ‘nation’ if you part French and part something else? Will we have a genetics police investigating bloodlines? What does the word ‘nation’ mean exactly? Will the Quebecers or the Hindus or the Chinese now have special rights, privileges legal or otherwise to form or enhance their ‘nation’? If not then why call them a ‘nation’? In Western nation states the elevation of cultural Marxism and the multi-cult club makes the above questions relevant. Quebecers are certainly asking these questions in Canada. "The mere symbolic aspect, maybe it's a feel-good factor for the immediate future, but it's not going to last for long if it's not accompanied by anything concrete," said Pierre Martin, a professor of political science at Universite de Montreal. No kidding. "It's going to be interpreted as something that has to mean something. It's going to be interpreted as something that has to lead to some sort of consolidation of powers or jurisdictions. ... If that is considered the end of the road for the Conservatives, it in fact may be considered just the beginning for some people in Quebec." So says a former Quebecer separatist politician. In other words – thanks for denoting us a nation – now give us the power to be one. So when will the 5 million Moslems in Canada (Quebec has 7 millions), ask for status as a ‘people’ and a state within a state (the Umma)? The ugliness of race-based sociology, or ethnic-tribal ‘reality’ in politics is evident across the world and inevitably leads to death or at the very least the dismemberment of the state. The unnatural Hapsburg empire, the first tottering postmodern state, was consumed by high spending, exorbitant taxation and the political recognition of its sociological reality. It was a disaster that shattered into many smaller ethnically divided states. This is one outcome of cultural Marxism. Another likely outcome is that to keep the unnatural ‘community of nations within the greater state’ together, politicians will bribe, spend more money and raise more taxes to keep the social peace. Cultural Marxism thus leads to statism and more government power. But this is what the cultural Marxist elite wants – more power. By dividing up a state into little groups they disperse opposition, ensure infighting between various elements and consolidate power. It is an old trick. It is however pathetic that ‘conservative’ politicians engage in such mindless anti-historical, and contra-Western practices.

Nothing new in the modern cults of 'science' We have seen it all before. Scientism, in which all principles that are deemed 'scientific' are venerated as gospel, and are marketed as obvious and ineffable verities, is of course a not-so-modern cult. The cult of the state long predates that of Sargon the Great, the first multi-national builder of empires. Sargon was just a better propagandit than his predecessorss. Today the same processes are at work, which established the intolerance of say the ancient Akkadian, Assyrian or Egyptian states. Today we daily witness an endless stream of activists, charlatans [politicians], frauds [state funded scientists] and Marxists [most of the voting population], who label themselves as 'rational', 'objective', or worse 'scientific' when the opposite labels would apply. There is nothing scientific or rational about dialectical Marxism and unfettered state power; or the love-and-compassionate-Socialism bandied by politicians and civil servants [with its fraudulent lies about poverty, capitalism, or how civilization was built]. There is nothing but hypocrisy in the cults of moral relativity, Islam is Peace, gay-sex-is-fun and heterosexuals are stupid; or the cult of the multi-cult, in which nothing is good or bad, and all historical experiences 'the same', with the exception of the Western experience which is very, very bad indeed. [Sargon's victory stele] Where does the madness of the modern set of cults lead to ? Destruction. Great empires in times past collapsed due to the bankruptcy of the state, resplendently offered in the insolvency of finance, ideas, culture and the derivatives associated with merging the church [of socialism, the multi-cult, activism] with the state to deny free-will, individualism, and freedom, to both succeed and fail. Islam is a notable cult failure due to many reasons, not the least of which is the merger of the church with the state and the disavowal of free-will and individual human worth [only the Allah thing has free-will and worth, you must simply submit to it]. Modern state-funded cults imitate the incoherence, intolerance and dysfunctional nature of Islam. Criticize the cult of warm and you will be branded. Object to gay marriage and you are slandered. Defend wealth and job creation and you are a heartless Hitlerite [the cult of Hitler was of course a national-socialist pagan cult, which destroyed civil society, the church, the individual, and which controlled all aspects of life, including the creation and support of 'green technology]. Pronounce against anything 'green' and you desire the liquidation of the earth mother. Propose market based solutions for health and education, and you slaver for the annihilation of the children's future, and that all the sick and wounded would immediately perish [irony: socialized health care kills thousands each year due to waiting lists and lack of access....]. Disagree with the ponzi plundering to fund old age pensions and you of course want every single aged person to eat dog food and die at age 65. Such claims are deemed 'moderate' and 'nuanced' by the media and deeply intelligent by most university profs. Culture is King and that is the first to fall. From reading books to American Idol and the incorruptible stupidity of modern entertainment is an example of cultural destruction. It does not take long to become a largely gamma-wave resistant society. So much easier to indoctrinate if the mental processes approach that of sleeping or unconsciousness. Eviscerating knowledge and substituting mindless, somnolent mental non-exercise, is one clear path to control. Keep the masses busy with their mindless entertainment, while the cults are created step by painful step. Regulate, tax, control, propagandize. Target the children. The Nazi and Soviet socialist cults were exceptional at doing this. A Nazi 'childrens' story about the Fox [the Jew] and why Germans [today substitute Arab, Moslem], must hate the Jew: Look, children, and the two compare,

The German and the Jew.

Take a good look at the two

In the picture drawn for you.

A joke — you think it is only that?

Easy to guess which is which, I say:

The German stands up, the Jew gives way.

The German is a proud young man,

Able to work and able to fight.

Because he is a fine big chap,

For danger does not care a rap,

The Jew has always hated him!

Here is the Jew, as all can see,

Biggest ruffian in our country;

He thinks himself the greatest beau

And yet is the ugliest, you know! Or 'the child with Lenin'. The friendly 'father' Lenin, happy with his disciple, the eager Soviet student. Apologists for both the socialist cult of the German Nazi state; and that of the Russian communal utopia, would declare that such propaganda was entirely 'scientific', founded upon 'consensus' and irreducible in its historical veracity. Of course the Jew was a monkey [read the Koran]. Of course the Soviet student must support the supremacist cult of Father Vlad. Of course the state is loving and caring. Of course there is 'warming'. Of course the rich need to plundered, if not killed. Of course the Jew is the problem in the Middle East, not the Arab or Moslem. Of course the United Nations is an objective, fair group of angels playing harps. Of course the human is a virus and a disease. Of course abortion is a female 'right'. Of course socialized health care is a general right [except for murdered fetuses]. Of course gay-sex is 'gene induced'. Of course climate has never changed. Of course natural selection and Darwinism are facts [they are still just theories without proof]. On and on it goes with the modern cults. Socialist scientism, the cult of warm, the cult of Darwin, and the cult of the multicultural declaim today the same verities as their progenitors in Germany and Russia.

Rome, Greece, Islam - primitive philosophies with primitive ideals - unlike Christianity Christian science, innovation, technology, architecture far excels those or the pagans Real science only arose in one place at one time, namely in Christian Europe. It never arose in any other spatial or geographic setting. That alone tells us something. Egypt, China, the various Islamic states and empires, India, ancient Greece and Rome - all these had their pre-scientific and pre-Christian inventions, creations and insights. Alchemy, astrology, and aspects of math, engineering and logic all find their places in various ancient empires. But none of them produced the modern world. That single fact makes it clear that far from hindering secular rationality, Christianity must have promoted it. As the prominent early 20th century mathematician and philosopher Alfred Whitehead suggested; science arose in Europe because of the: “faith in the possibility of science....derivative from medieval theology.” It was only in Europe that we have the “.....medieval insistence on the rationality of God, conceived as with the personal energy of Jehovah and with the rationality of a Greek philosopher.” Whitehead is perfectly correct. Christianity must have been a key component in the creation of science. In reading about the badly named 'middle ages', it is clear that the Christian world was not a monolithic Catholic barbarity fighting against reason. The opposite was true. In fact, it is clear that Christianity was certainly responsible for Europe's ascension to science and rationality. We know this must be a valid thesis because non-Christian states and empires did not produce the modern world. In fact they never came close. In general, we can forward a universal law which would withstand any serious scrutiny and state that non-Christian theologies militate and obstruct against the development of reason and science . There are many reasons why non-Christian philosophies are so primitive. Most non-Christian belief systems are circular and irrational. Their Gods are impersonal and not prone to reason. The universe is considered to be one large mystery, and inner peace and self-worth can only be achieved through meditation and mystical insights. Reason is not celebrated. Neither is individualism. Centuries of meditation and platitudes about brotherly love and accepting one's 'fate' in life; does not produce science. Christian theology is different in that the various schisms, sects and debates within the Christian universe, led to, and reinforced, the nascent European propensity for rational inquiry. Some of the best minds that the human species has produced knew that scientific truth was a pursuit of creation. Newton, Kepler, Galileo, and Descartes all justified their search for natural laws and natural-scientific truth, on the basis that a perfect God would want man to understand the perfect world of reality. This cultural innovation, premised on the non-mystical Christian ideology, was instrumental to establish rational enlightenment. Non-Christian philosophies are thus not only mystical systems of irrationality piety, but also ortho-praxy belief systems, or 'correct practices'. Christianity is ortho-dox, or a system of 'correct thinking '. Islam is the the ultimate expression of orthopraxy submission. The entire edifice of Islamic 'thought' is simply to impose 'correct practices' and make sure that people follow these rituals. For Muslims, the Koran is the word of a supposed 'God' who is in fact Ali-ilah or the male Meccan moon deity. Allah is as far removed from the Christian ideal of God, as Taoism is from the Christian ideal of non-mystical, rationality. Islam does not encourage investigation or truth-seeking. It is a system of conformity, intent on social management, and the expansion of the cult at the expense of the 'other'. In such a mind-set orthopraxy is mandatory. Rationality would only lead to fragmentation and disputation and distract the 'group' from the main task at hand, namely; universalist supremacy and control. Islam also mistakenly accepted in-toto, the elements of Greek thought and accepted them as 'facts' which could not be improved. This is a decidedly Muslim cultural attribute. Once something like the Koran, or the terrible philosophies of Plato; or the mystical explanations of Aristotle, are accepted as 'truth', the Muslim carefully stores them away and pronounces them ineffable and irrefutable. The rest of the cult are told to worship these 'self-evident' verities and simply submit to them. No inquiry is allowed. Islam is the opposite of a system of individualized, free-will and rational investigation. It is a system of obedience and acceptance. In Western Christian states, the ancient Greeks were held up to investigation, ridicule, enhancement and all manner of change and re-shaping. None of the ancient thinkers and scribes were accepted as omniscient. After the replacement of Rome by the three main Germanic Kingdoms, we are told that Europe entered a 'Dark Age'. This is of course a dark lie. Europe never 'lost' ancient thinking and Roman-Greek literature and philosophies. Roads, cities, and trade caravans did not instantly plunge into the abyss during 476 A.D. What post Roman Europe did reject over time was the Greco-Romano belief system that history was circular; reason subordinate to the whims and fancies of a number of Gods; and that the human was not possessed of any particular attributes of free-will or deep comprehension. In short Christian Europe began to reject the mystical aspects of Roman-Greek philosophy. The development of Christian culture made this an inescapable reality. In fact, a very good argument can be made that far from initiating science and secular reasoning in the West; ancient Greece and Rome militated against it . The empires of Greece, and Rome were all slave empires. Justifying slavery is most easily done with a system steeped in fatalism, racism or supremacism, and mysticism in which Gods play games with human souls. Any theology of morality and science immediately rejects slavery as evil and unproductive. Slavery always obstructs moral, social and technological progress. Greek and Roman pantheism and culture enshrined and justified slavery. Greek inventors knew of the steam engine; Roman engineers had the skills to build water mills; and both had insights into alchemic processes which should have produced rational science. Yet modern rationality failed to develop in Greece and Rome. The culture prevented it as did the multitudes of laboring slaves. Why bother with innovation and the freeing of millions of humans ? Won't they then rise up and crush the state and the carefully-created system protected by various Gods? The same is true of China, India, and all the Islamic states and empires of the past 1400 years. These non-Christian states, never possessed the Christian urge to attain both spiritual and rational knowledge and truth and were thus mired in slavery and anti-modern mysticism. Christianity ended slavery by 800 AD in Europe and it was the Christian church in alliance with the Royal Navy and Northern US armies, which eradicated slavery in the southern US and slave trading on the world's oceans. No other theology in world history ended slavery. No other ideology manufactured the moral and military armaments needed to end the immoral practice of human enslavement and degradation. No other conception of human affairs elevated both the spirit and the pursuit of rationality. Far from being opposed to science, a good argument can be made that Christianity created it.

Spacecraft Earth: A Guide for Passengers, Dr Henry Richter and David Coppedge Perfect Design is due to Random chance, luck, things happen? This is modern science? According to Evolutionists and ‘Scientists’, there are billions of galaxies and there ‘must be’ many life forms in our Universe. This is based on probability theory without analysis or understanding variables and is a rather puerile way of viewing reality. If we use our intelligence and apply real probability theory, based on what we know, and the many (thousands) of ‘coincidences’, variables and exact patterns that need to be available to just create the conditions for Life, then it is clear that the Earth is unique and Life on this planet a singular creative event. Real science tells us this. In the real world it is clear that our atmosphere is designed: “The mixture of roughly 20% reactive oxygen and 80% neutral nitrogen seems ideal for life as we know it. Our atmosphere shields us from the high-energy subatomic particles that could disrupt cells. So, of all the atmospheres possible on other worlds, the composition and ratios of elements are critical. Our magnetic field deflects the streams of solar electrons and protons, so that most of them do not penetrate the atmosphere. It’s clear that any planet must have a magnetic field to support complex life, and, moreover, a field that is not too strong and not too weak. If too strong, it might disrupt the planet’s crust. If too weak, it could not deflect charged particles.” The magnetic shield has lost 5 % of its strength in the past 150 years. This indicates that the Earth cannot possible be billions of years old. If we work back in time the strength of the shield would make life impossible some 15.000 years ago. If we work forward and do some basic math, it is clear that within about 1.600 years the shield will fail and life will cease. There is no known mechanism to generate electrical-magnetic energy within the Earth’s core. None. This is obvious proof that Darwinian theology is absolutely wrong (and corrupt). Magnetic energy cannot self-create. Using real Science we can also consider just some basis probability mathematics on a few (not a complete list) of cosmological conditions necessary for life with chance applied (10% is far too high, it should be 1%). Probability theory confirms that life on Earth is unique: “Located within the galaxy habitable zone 10% · A stable star with constant energy output 10% · A planet formed within the habitable zone around the star 10% · A planet in a stable orbit maintaining a steady distance from the star 10% · Protected by gas giant planets in the solar system 10% · A rotation speed of about 24 hours 10% · A planet with a suitable atmosphere: oxygen rich, depth, circulation 10% · A planet with the appropriate mass 10% · A planet with abundant water 10% · A reasonable ratio of water to land mass 10% · A crust capable of plate tectonics 10% · A magnetic field within the proper strength range 10% · A moon of the proper size, distance, and orbit around the planet 10% · A readily available source of abundant carbon compounds 10% · Trace elements of the right type and quantity 10% One could go on and on, adding more factors, but these are a few of the essential features to consider. So let’s multiply that out: 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 = 10-15. This probability times 1014 candidate planets leaves 10-1 planets, less than one!” It is absurd and sad that people are saturated with the indoctrinated cult belief that the cosmological position of the Earth and its mineral composition (forgetting for a second the absolute complexity of all living beings), arose by happenstance. This is anti-science and delays knowledge and progress. Consider the design of Astro-biology: “From the literature of astrobiology, we can identify ten or more other ‘zones’ required for habitability, in addition to circumstellar distance: • Galactic Habitable Zone: the solar system must occupy a narrow band within the galaxy. • Continuously Habitable Zone: the habitable zone must not vary significantly. • Temporal Habitable Zone: the habitable zone must last long enough for life to persist. • Chemical and Thermodynamic Habitable Zone: the planet’s chemistry and heat transfer mechanisms must permit liquid water to persist. • Ultraviolet Habitable Zone: the planet must filter out ionizing radiation from its star. • Tidal Habitable Zone: the star must not tidally ‘lock’ its habitable planet to force one hemisphere to always face the star (this rules out most planets). • Obliquity Habitable Zone: the star must not ‘erase’ its habitable planet’s tilt through tidal forces. (While not eliminating the possibility of life, a planet without a tilt would have no seasons, drastically reducing its habitable surface area.) • Eccentricity Habitable Zone: the planet must have a nearly circular orbit so that it stays in the zone. • Stellar Chemistry Habitable Zone: the star must have the right chemical composition to remain quiet and well-behaved. A G2 main-sequence star like our sun is ideal. • Stellar Wind Habitable Zone: the star must not be given to extreme ‘space weather’ that might strip off a habitable planet’s atmosphere. • Inhabited Zone: recently, two astrobiologists suggested that to be habitable, a planet needs inhabitants! “…there is a growing amount of evidence supporting the idea that our Planet will not be the same if we remove every single form of life from its surface,” a news report said.” This is an obvious design. How would 10 zones form and line up in perfect unison by random chance from a ‘big bang’ explosion? Or to promote life the planet must also have life (so what came first or did both arrive at the same time?). These are observable scientific facts, not story-telling. The chances of the above zones being in place for any other planet in the Universe is zero. The Sun and its perfect design: “Our sun emits a ‘solar constant’ (energy received at earth’s surface) of 1.361 kilowatts per square meter. At solar maximum (the period in the sun’s 11-year cycle when its activity increases to its highest level), the heat received at the earth increases by just one tenth of one percent—an extremely slight difference. One of the longest running scientific observations ever made of the sun measured only 0.06% variation from the solar constant over a 32year period. Earth’s distance from the sun—ranging from 91.4 million to 94.5 million miles (average about 92.9 million miles or 150 million kilometers)—keeps it always within the habitable zone. That zone is pretty narrow. Venus is well outside the inner edge and Mars is outside the outer edge. The sun must have an energy output and size as to give the right amount of heat to a planet in the habitable zone, and that means a main sequence G2 dwarf star. Only about 1% of all stars fall into this class, and many are not as quiet as our sun. The associated star, furthermore, must be stable in its energy output. Any significant temporal variation of the heat output would cause catastrophic swings in the temperature of the planet which would be destructive of life forms.” The Moon and its perfect design: As moons go, ours is extraordinarily large in relation to its planet’s diameter. This is another unique feature of Spacecraft Earth that is quite remarkable. Our moon is an enormous object with significant gravity, roughly one-sixth of that of the earth, as you may recall from watching videos of Apollo astronauts cheerfully leaping high from the surface. No other planet in the solar system (with the exception of Pluto, a ‘dwarf planet’) has a moon so large relative to its size. Mercury and Venus have no moon; Mars has two tiny satellites. The gas giants have some moons larger than ours, but they are very small relative to the planets themselves. The orbital choreography between sun, moon and earth also pumps energy into the oceans independent of solar heating, creating a huge engine that provides several benefits for life. It cleanses the coastlines, it circulates nutrients between latitudes, and it forces some of the deep water to the surface and back again. All this energy input contributes to the weather, too, by increasing evaporation and cloud formation. Although the tides are not anything spectacular toward the equator, or even along the coasts of North America, we find that in the higher latitudes such as Anchorage the diurnal tidal action can amount to 20, 30 or 40 feet of rise and fall. The Earth’s Rotation: “The rate of rotation is important to have a reasonable length of night and day. A rotation rate of one hour would be too short for life cycles to get rest and activity. A rotation rate of once a month would be too long for night-to-day changes. A rotation rate of 24 hours seems just about right—how about that? The mass of the planet needs to be in the proper range to produce gravity large enough to keep an atmosphere, but not too much atmosphere which would have high pressures.” “Almost any physical characteristic of the earth, its structure and composition, and position in the solar system is the way it is to permit the existence of life. From the properties of atoms, the elements, compounds, to the exact composition and placement of the earth, everything seems to be the way it is to allow life to flourish here.” Ignoring the glories and wonders of Life and forgetting basic science has devalued the Human in the modern world, and will breed conflict, hate and death.

The dying light of Western civilisation? Anti-White Racism, Dismantling history and culture Destroying the foundations of modern civilisation is unlikely to work out well Source Paul Krause, American Thinker The West is a dying civilization. That much is evident. But it mustn't be. Who will defend the flame that once illuminated the skies and sang songs of ascents up on high? In the rush to destroy all things Western, few so-called conservatives—anywhere—risk themselves to defend our patrimony and our future. In fact, many so-called conservatives sound like liberals defaming Western civilization and American history by accepting the anti-Western narrative of racism and imperialism. It is predicable, almost comical, that the self-declared conservatives across the West grovel to the narrative pushed by the nihilistic and iconoclastic Multicultural Left. Republicans in America plan to unveil their own police reform legislation. Looks like conservatives are abandoning the police too! As classics of American art and cinema are canceled, writers like David Marcus implicitly accept the multiculturalist creed by writing that Gone With the Wind should be saved because the first African-American won an Oscar for her performance in the film. Over in Britain, statues honoring British heroes like Lord Admiral Nelson and Winston Churchill are targets for desecration and removal. Moreover, anti-Western activists openly yearn for the dismantling of British history and culture. And in Australia, Green Party activists defaced a statue of James Cook. The riots are not about George Floyd, police reform and accountability, or justice. The riots are the systematic attempt to exterminate Western civilization and culture from the very lands in which its roots are planted. This, of course, is something that Conservative Inc doesn’t want to acknowledge or is woefully blind to. Predictably, Conservative Inc writers implicitly accept the multiculturalist narrative but try to turn it on its head—claiming how they are the true defenders of multiculturalism and feminism. What all patriotic Americans need to understand is that the riots and ongoing turmoil is being used as a wrecking ball to our history, heritage, and civilization. The power of the anti-American activists in our culture is not simply because they control the universities, which produce the armies of anti-Western legions that take up positions in business, politics, and the media (which serves as the primary enforcer of the multiculturalist ideology), but because they understand the role of memory and narrative regarding identity. Culture is essential to our identity as a nation and a civilization. The parasitic anti-Western vandals control the narrative and no one is allowed to deviate from it. Even conservatives must be shackled to it. Conservatives, at best, accept the Left’s narrative but try to twist and turn it to present themselves as the true defenders of multiculturalism and anti-racism. All to no avail. Multiculturalism is not about multiculturalism. That is the greatest misnomer of all time. Multiculturalism is the veiled vehicle for dismantling and destroying Western civilization. This is not about political power as asinine conservatives often say. This is about civilizational desecration and destruction. When multiculturalists complain about European and American statues, they are only voicing their genuine attitude of resentful hatred. What hath the multiculturalist in common with Julius Caesar, George Washington, or Horatio Nelson? Nothing. And they never will. Even if they reside in Western nations. Multiculturalists hate all Western heroes precisely because they’re Western. Even white abolitionists are targets of their rage because they are “murderers” and “colonists.” Anything and everything Western, as Susan Sontag said, is “the cancer of humanity.” Instead of presenting a counter narrative defending the heroism and magnanimity of Western civilization the pale and pathetic defenders of Western civilization already consign themselves to the dust bins of extinction by accepting the ludicrous and abstract beliefs that what constitute Western civilization are the abstract and fluid ideals of human rights, democracy, and freedom which permits the West’s eventual annihilation. And with that annihilation the end of Western consciousness, heritage, and history is complete. What makes the American unique is that he is the product of all of Europe and European history converged onto this New World and New Continent. Without the Greek victory at Salamis there would be no America. Without Alexander the Great there would be no America. Without Julius Caesar or Augustus Caesar there would be no America. Without Charles Martel there would be no America. Without Christopher Columbus there would be no America. (And this is why the multiculturalist tears down statues of Columbus—they only defile Western heroes.) Without Sir Francis Drake there would be no America. Without James Wolfe there would be no America. Every great Western hero of the past is now on the chopping block of the multiculturalist terror campaign. Americans have the richest history and heritage precisely because we are the children of pilgrims, adventurers, and lovers stretching across the millennia whose actions made safe the possibility for the European settlement of the New World. This would serve conservatives well if they understood this fact and embraced it. The Greek heroes at Thermopylae and Salamis died for us. The Franks who died stopping an Islamic invasion of Europe died for us. The Catholics who fought the Turks at Lepanto died for us. The brave and heroic sailors, settlers, and pioneers who died in the New World died for us. If we love them let us honor them and immortalize them. We once did. Now we must show our love for them again in defending them against the new barbarians from within. If conservatives will not defend Western civilization by proclaiming the heroic nobility of the West then what, exactly, are they conserving? Besides occasional tax cuts—which is hardly heroic—what is the last great conservative victory in the past 20 years? Perhaps conservatives in 50 years will call for the removal of Washington when everyone clamors to deface the Father of our Country. It won’t be long until we pass Mount Rushmore and utter those haunting words, “Nothing besides remain, round the decay / Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare / The lone and level sands stretch far away.”

BLM and the anti-White Fascists Racist, Marxist, part of a New World Order BLM – just another Marxist-Fascist Group dedicated to overthrowing freedom. Racist to its core with its anti-White, anti-Jewish messaging and beliefs. Violent, intolerant, illiterate. A founder of BLM admits that they are trained Marxists and violent socialists. Racism is just a bait used to cower the gullible and stupid. The real intention of BLM is to end freedom, impose statism, and as the Brownshirts did for Hitler, aid their political party they either influence or partially control (Democratic Party in the US, the Labour Party in the UK, the Liberal Party in Canada), take permanent ownership of society – with the BLM agenda shaping policy.

Darwin's Religion: Big Rocks, The Moon, The Magnetic Shield Darwinian Miracles cannot explain how a Magnetic Shield or the Moon is formed. Evolution’s religious dogma. 1-Billions if not Trillions of years ago, by random chance, big rock hits the Earth 2-Random collision magically produces a moon 3-Moon miraculously finds an orbit in the perfect location from the Earth 4-The random collision generates a magnetic shield, necessary for life 5-Other miraculous events regenerate said magnetic shield for Billions, if not Trillions of years….. This sci-fi fantasy is called Science. Darwinist and the cult of ‘things happen’, often invoke the ‘big rock did it’ theorem when they have no explanation or observable-rational science. An example is the moon. Apparently, a big rock collided with the Earth, creating a moon out of the resulting chaos, with the impact carefully placing the moon 239.000 miles from the Earth, in a perfect position. Move the moon from its current orbit more than a fraction and life ceases on this planet. The chance of a big rock colliding with the earth, forming a perfectly sized-moon through a random collision, with the 'big rock' being of sufficient size to create a large object such as the moon, but not large enough, or with enough velocity to destroy the Earth, and yet providing the right level of force and energy to place the new sphere at the perfect orbiting position, is of course, zero. Try replicating the ‘big rock’ created the moon theorem in a contrived lab. Take 2 objects, have them collide and see what happens. Nothing except destruction and debris. Only the Darwinian god of miracles could have intervened to put the debris into a large orb, or allowed for a massive chunk of the Earth’s surface to be conveniently cut off in the form of a sphere and ejected, ever so gently and purposely, in the form of the moon, into its present location. But this is Science of course. Even better, the Darwinian Theologians with hands on their Evolutionary Holy Book, proclaim that the ‘big rock’ not only created the moon, but also the magnetic field. Two miracles in one event! Praise Charles. The chance of both the moon and the magnetic field – necessary for life – being created through a large inter-stellar collision is according to the Darwinian religion, a complete certainty. Back in reality, the mathematical probability of either is zero. Colliding objects don’t generate magnetism. In reality, the cult of Science has no clue about the origins of magnetism. They posture that complex currents above the Earth’s iron core as it cools generate a dynamo to create the magnetic field. Maybe. No proof is offered, but even if true, how do the ‘Scientists’ explain that in the past 150 years the strength of the Earth’s magnetic field has decreased by 10%? Back in the real world there is the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics. Everything tends to entropy. This means that the magnetic field like everything else, will simply disappear one day. Darwinian theorist Stephanie Pappas at Live Science (30 April 2018) assumes that the some magical restoration of the magnetic shield occurs with ‘polarity reversals’. According to the 2nd law of Thermodynamics a reversal will not increase the intensity or strength of the shield. Energy is lost to space. Without a new source there must be a net loss of energy. This is why the magnetic shield strength is declining 5% every 100 years or less. This means that in 1600 years it is gone. Life will cease. Using real science, Dr. Henry Richter explains this problem in his book Spacecraft Earth: A Guide for Passengers (2017). He clearly explains that the Earth’s magnetic field is not a perpetual motion machine: it is doomed to decay, and will continue to decay at the rate measured for 188 years – the longest-running continuous measurement in geophysics. At the current rate, life will stop, not in trillions, billions, or millions of years – but in just over a thousand. Sources

UK: Green Fascism is the focus of the Non-Conservative Government of Boris Johnson Destroying the world's 5th largest economy is the agenda. Green Fascist madness in the UK. BoJo the Green Liberal and his crony-capitalist gang are gung-ho to impose a set of crippling measures totalling some £50-100 Billion pounds, to make the UK ‘net carbon neutral’ (whatever that stupidity means), by 2050. All that the imbeciles will do is lose the next election. Boy wonder Chancellor smiling coiffed Sushi Knick-knack is promoting ‘Green Industrialisation’ post the government-created Corona fauxdemic. De-industrialisation is more accurate. Knick-knack is part of a government and party that is completely ignorant about economics (along with immigration, the cult of Muhammad and other sundry topics). “Rishi Sunak is planning a ‘green industrial revolution’ to help to create jobs for people who are made redundant because of the pandemic. The chancellor is preparing to bolster the government’s investment in clean energy as part of an economic stimulus package next month. There could also be a fund to help to ‘reskill’ workers so they can get green jobs in areas such as insulation upgrades, offshore wind and carbon capture. The measures are understood to go significantly beyond the Conservatives’ manifesto commitment to create two million jobs in clean energy within the next decade. The Tories have promised to cut greenhouse gas emissions to ‘net zero’ by 2050.” Sheer fantasy. Dr John Constable, energy editor of the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF), warned that this was going to happen in a short paper published last month ‘The Fatal Attraction of a Post-Covid Green New Deal’. Fatal stupidity. All that will happen is jobs will be lost and taxes increased to pay for the largesse, handed over the Corporate Friends of the Conservative Party. All this economic destruction to battle ‘plant food’ (.04 % of atmospheric gas by weight) and the non-existent ‘Climate Change’ or Globaloneywarming (sometimes called the 4 seasons). Given the billions spent on the Covid-fauxdemic, there is no financial means to support Green Fascism, and the de-construction of industry and the economy. Green Fascism kills Jobs: A study by economics professor Dr Gabriel Calzada Alvarez of Madrid’s University of Rey Juan Carlos found that for every ‘green job’ created by the Spanish government, another 2.2 jobs were destroyed in the real economy. Another study, in the UK, found that for every green job created by government ‘investment’ in the renewables industry, 3.7 jobs were destroyed in the real economy. As well Solar and Wind do not generate anywhere near enough energy to run a modern economy – far below 4% of total energy needed in the UK. Both are unreliable and both use ‘carbon’ fuel processes to make the panels and turbines, negating the intended effect of de-carbonisation. Neither are eco-friendly of course, indeed quite the opposite. Solar panels leech and destroy the geography and soil; and the bird-choppers murder millions of bird-life each year. Apparently, the eco-loons are fine with both. Solar and Wind ‘power’ survive on subsidies (given to large corporate interests) and would never be used in a private economy or invested in by private investors risking own capital. Yes, hydro can be 'recycled' and reused, but that will not run a modern economy. Coal, Gas, Nat Gas on the other hand, are clean burning for the most part. Nuclear is essential and the cleanest fuel around yet opposed by the usual cadre of Green half-wits. Maybe the Fake News can ask Chancellor Knick-knack, what is the objective of this de-industrialisation? How can a country of 70 millions run a modern economy mostly on water (doesn't water eventually become depleted?), solar and bird choppers? Why would a nation state commit economic suicide? Why should voters allow the Con party to win the next election?