Labour accuses George Osborne of ‘risky behaviour’ as Office for Budget Responsibility forecast shows decline from £67bn surplus in 2010

Families are expected to run up £40bn of debt this year, sparking fears about Britain’s economic recovery.



Labour raised concerns that millions of households would face “serious hardship” if interest rates rise and warned the borrowing trend could harm the economy.

The latest Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) forecasts have found that households have moved from a surplus of £67bn in 2010, the year the coalition took power, to a £40bn deficit this year.

Unsustainable borrowing is on course to near the levels reached in the run-up to the 2008 financial crash, according to Labour.

Seema Malhotra, the shadow chief secretary to the Treasury, said: “George Osborne is relying on millions of British families going further into debt to hit his growth targets.

George Osborne’s economic miracle is built on a mountain of personal debt | Owen Jones Read more

“This is risky behaviour from a chancellor whose policy decisions are hurting, not helping, British families. Alarm bells should be ringing. There is a real risk that millions of families will face serious hardship if interest rates start to rise.

“Of course families need access to credit and the ability to borrow to invest for the future. George Osborne should be seeking to rebalance the economy away from an over-reliance on borrowing and debt.

“Labour is clear about the need for a strong and sustainable economic recovery. Osborne’s short-term political decisions risk real long-term damage to the finances of millions of British families and the nation’s economy.”

The former business secretary Sir Vince Cable warned Britain was returning to “old and unhappily discredited” methods of economic growth.

He told the Independent: “We’re back on the treadmill of growth being sustained by personal borrowing. Much of it is against an inflating housing stock.

“Taken together with other indicators like the very weak external deficit position, it suggests we’re getting back to the old and unhappily discredited forms of economic growth.”