A pair of key senators on Wednesday unveiled a revised version of their bipartisan package aimed at lowering health care costs, ahead of a committee markup expected next week.

Sens. Lamar Alexander Andrew (Lamar) Lamar AlexanderGraham: GOP has votes to confirm Trump's Supreme Court nominee before the election The Hill's Morning Report - Sponsored by Facebook - Washington on edge amid SCOTUS vacancy This week: Supreme Court fight over Ginsburg's seat upends Congress's agenda MORE (R-Tenn.) and Patty Murray Patricia (Patty) Lynn MurraySenate Democrats introduce legislation to probe politicization of pandemic response Trump health officials grilled over reports of politics in COVID-19 response CDC director pushes back on Caputo claim of 'resistance unit' at agency MORE (D-Wash.) released the package, which takes steps to protect patients from receiving massive “surprise” medical bills when they get care from an out-of-network doctor. It also cracks down on anti-competitive clauses in hospital contracts with insurers that can drive up costs, and encourages the introduction of cheaper generic drugs.

ADVERTISEMENT

Alexander and Murray are known as two of the best bipartisan dealmakers in the Senate. Their previous signature health care effort in 2017 and 2018 to shore up ObamaCare eventually failed amid the bitter partisan divide over the health law.

Alexander says the new effort is intended to focus on other areas in health care that are less partisan.

“This is a different discussion [than ObamaCare],” the senator said Tuesday. “This is the way the United States Senate is supposed to work."

One of the most significant and contentious decisions in the new bill is on the mechanism for protecting patients from surprise medical bills.

While both parties and a range of health care industry groups agreed that patients should be protected, insurers sparred with hospitals and doctors over the details of how to determine what the insurer should pay the medical provider. Both sides jockeyed to avoid taking a big financial hit.

Alexander and Murray have landed on an approach that essentially sets a payment rate for the insurer to pay the doctor or hospital, an approach that was favored by insurers but opposed by hospitals, who worried the move is moving too far towards government setting of payment rates.

The approach is similar to one proposed by bipartisan House committee leaders, Reps. Frank Pallone Jr. Frank Joseph PallonePharma execs say FDA will not lower standards for coronavirus vaccine Dem chairmen urge CMS to prevent nursing homes from seizing stimulus payments Federal watchdog finds cybersecurity vulnerabilities in FCC systems MORE (D-N.J.) and Greg Walden Gregory (Greg) Paul WaldenOVERNIGHT ENERGY: House passes sweeping clean energy bill | Pebble Mine CEO resigns over secretly recorded comments about government officials | Corporations roll out climate goals amid growing pressure to deliver House passes sweeping clean energy bill Hillicon Valley: DOJ proposes tech liability shield reform to Congress | Treasury sanctions individuals, groups tied to Russian malign influence activities | House Republican introduces bill to set standards for self-driving cars MORE (R-Ore.), a sign that this option could move forward.

“The single issue I hear most about from Tennesseans is, ‘What are you going to do about the health care costs I pay for out of my own pocket?’ Well, we've got an answer,” Alexander said in a statement.

The bipartisan work comes as Democrats also attack Republicans for undermining the Affordable Care Act.

Murray sought to strike a balance by emphasizing that more work needed to be done related to ObamaCare.

“This must be a first step, not a last one,” she said in a statement. “I hope Republicans will build on this momentum by joining us at the table on bigger health care issues too—like repairing the damage from President Trump Donald John TrumpSteele Dossier sub-source was subject of FBI counterintelligence probe Pelosi slams Trump executive order on pre-existing conditions: It 'isn't worth the paper it's signed on' Trump 'no longer angry' at Romney because of Supreme Court stance MORE’s health care sabotage and protecting people with pre-existing conditions.”