A: First, I'm not sure that in today's NBA game, where everyone has to be "live" in the offense to provide spacing, that there would necessarily be a place for a Rodman type in 2016-17. That's not to say that rebounding and defense won't always be coveted, just that defensive rules and double-team options elsewhere mitigate the significance of the one-way player. And I also think that's selling Justise way too short. His jumper may not be perfect, but it's still at least enough of a threat to make defenses take notice. And in transition or on the move, he is far more of an attack threat than Rodman ever was. Appreciate that for what he did in his era, Rodman was Hall of Fame worthy. But the game has changed dramatically since Bad Boys and even Pat Riley's Oakley-Mason Knicks. That is why more is expected, and should be expected, from Justise's offensive game when it comes to reaching his potential. I appreciate that Erik Spoelstra would love everyone to back off the concerns and questions about Justise's offense. But I look at it another way, that the potential is there, and it would be a waste not to see it maximized.