Nemtsov's death is tragic. But he was not "the heart" of Russia's opposition, and it's extremely irresponsible of the media to suggest as much

Media reports about Boris Nemtsov's place in Russian politics are as puzzling as the bizarre and tragic circumstances of his murder. Anna Nemtsova's (no relation to the deceased) piece for The Daily Beast is probably the worse we've seen yet. Her headline, "Boris Nemtsov, Heart of Russia’s Opposition, Gunned Down in Moscow," gives the impression that Nemtsov was, well, the heart of Russia's opposition. He wasn't, and to claim he was is silly.

A poll from last year shows that only 45% of Russians even recognized Nemtsov's name; of those 45%, only 1% "trusted" him—compared to 17%, who said they did not trust him.

A victim of a terrible murder. But not a driving force behind Russia's opposition

But this didn't stop Nemtsova from writing that he was "the driving force of Russia’s opposition movement". He really, really wasn't. (But the motive behind claiming he was is fairly obvious.) After all, why would Czar Putin "remove" a politician that less than 50% of Russians had even heard of? That won't sell newspapers!

Here's more from Nemtsova:

Nemtsov’s strong, tall body was sprawled on the ground under the falling rain with the Kremlin towers in the background. The scene became symbolic of Russia's modern history.

...What?