Hillary Clinton actually was right about one thing during her campaign: It is dangerous to question the outcome of an election. Stacey Abrams lost. She claims voter suppression cost her the governorship and yet more people than ever turned out to vote. And yet she refused to concede and still will tell anyone who will listen that she rightly should be governor of Georgia.

Once again, she lost.

So leave it to Vogue to dress up Abrams for a glamor shot and ask if the woman who refuses to accept an election defeat is the one who can “save American democracy.”

She can’t even accept it https://t.co/ylzgudPrSL — The Daily Wire (@realDailyWire) August 13, 2019

It amazes me that they are still cheering on this complete threat to democracy…. Claiming a election is rigged is now celebrated by the media, man i wonder why that is https://t.co/KVBNZ0KW0L — Bob Malak (@bob_malak) August 13, 2019

No. She clearly doesn’t even understand the concept, since she refused to acknowledge her loss by 50,000 votes. — RealTexasDad (@SteveKreitler) August 13, 2019

No. She’s a sore loser who can’t even win an election — Obi_1_D_AllKnowing ?? (@obiopiah) August 13, 2019

I have a theory. No. My expanded theory. HELL no. — Chuck Vipperman (@ChuckVipperman) August 13, 2019

What a ridiculous headline. She hasn’t won an election and she is going to “save” American Democracy? Please! — Bill Vanderborg (@BillVanderborg) August 13, 2019

I wouldn't exactly call a lack of acceptance for democratic election results the "saving of American democracy". But hey, what do I know, right? — Badg3rman (@TheBadg3rman) August 13, 2019

Spoiler: No. — Funky Code Medina ✝️ (@spazafraz) August 13, 2019

She’d have to win an election 1st, and then she would have to find an America with a Democracy.

We in the United States of America will keep our Constitutional Republic. ? — Billy Wyatt ⭐️⭐️⭐️ (@ConservaDude1) August 13, 2019

I won’t vote for someone who refuses to accept the outcomes of elections. That means she doesn’t even believe in democracy. — Michele Schiesser (@MicheleSchiesse) August 13, 2019

Can she win an election? Not really…. ? — Hong Kong Donger (@atlharp) August 13, 2019

Is Vogue the new Onion? — ConservativeDad (@HatfieldJr1013) August 13, 2019

Save it from an awesome economy and record low unemployment? — Elle Driver's Firebird (@JacobyChrisrt) August 13, 2019

If democracy is losing statewide democratic elections and pretending otherwise, yes. — Scotty B, Phetasy Doctorate (PhD) (@ScottishDuke) August 13, 2019

That would be a NO. She can’t win Georgia must less anything else. She’s a total fraud. — Magnolia (@Pavoretti_) August 13, 2019

She can’t even win a race. ?? — MelanieGore (@melaniesgore) August 13, 2019

This would be a hard pass- she wouldn’t even accept the results from the election she lost & was very divisive about it all. The ego of her to not recognize the results was not a good look. — kelly gottesman (@khgottesman) August 13, 2019

Considering the fact that she can’t seem to accept the outcome of a democratic election in which she lost, the answer is probably no. — Amanda Beres (@ARC91681) August 13, 2019

She’s untethered from reality, so no. — Nuclear Dave (@woodstockdave) August 13, 2019

She should probably concede the last election before she starts a new campaign. — Little Mo Peep (@yoyomamo18) August 13, 2019

She’s still at it:

.@staceyabrams at the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades convention says in her 2018 race, she ran against the "architect of voter suppression," adding "we won" by having record voter turnout. pic.twitter.com/W5kWjU1TVS — Julio Rosas (@Julio_Rosas11) August 13, 2019

Related: