Andy Rubin has been accused of running a “sex ring” with at least one woman, unsealed court documents revealed Tuesday, shedding new light on last year’s New York Times report detailing a claim by Rubin’s now ex-wife that the Android creator had been involved in “ownership relationships” with multiple women.

A woman identified in the court documents as “M” would “agree to perform various sexual acts with multiple men,” have it filmed for “the enjoyment of Rubin and other men,” and then would have sex with Rubin “off-camera,” the complaint alleges.

Also, central to the complaint is the accusation that Rubin cheated his former wife out of a lot of money with a prenuptial agreement that didn’t cover some of his personal wealth and that may have been drafted by an attorney with a conflict of interest.

Visit Business Insider’s homepage for more stories.

The Android creator Andy Rubin has been accused of running a “sex ring” with at least one woman and of cheating his ex-wife out of millions of dollars in their prenuptial agreement, according to a civil complaint unsealed Tuesday in connection with another case.

The documents were first shared by BuzzFeed News’ Ryan Mac. A lawyer for Rubin says the complaint is full of “false claims.”

“This is a family law dispute involving a wife who regrets her decision to execute a prenuptial agreement,” a lawyer for Rubin told Business Insider. “It is full of false claims and we look forward to telling our side of the story.”

Read more: Larry Page ‘bypassed’ Alphabet’s board to personally give Andy Rubin a $150 million stock package while he was under investigation on suspicion of sexual misconduct, according to lawsuit

The unsealed complaint says one woman, referred to as “M,” worked with Rubin in what the filing describes as a “sex ring.” “M” would “agree to perform various sexual acts with multiple men,” have it filmed for “the enjoyment of Rubin and other men,” and then would have sex with Rubin “off-camera,” the documents say.

The details shed new light on last year’s New York Times report indicating Rubin’s now ex-wife had accused the Android creator of being involved in “ownership relationships” with multiple women during his marriage. The complaint says that arrangement saw Rubin “pay for their expenses in exchange for offering them to other men.”

Lees ook op Business Insider Huis kopen? Aanpassing overdrachtsbelasting in 2021 zorgt ervoor dat starters beter even wachten – beleggers moeten juist nu hun slag slaan

With the complaint, Rie Rubin, his now-former wife, is seeking to invalidate a prenuptial agreement, with which she says Rubin was able to exclude some of his personal assets from being covered by – including what appears to be his portion of the proceeds from the sale of Rubin’s previous company Danger to Microsoft in 2008.

Specifics of that deal were redacted in the documents. The documents say, however, that Rubin’s net worth went from about $10.3 million at the time of their marriage up to an estimated $350 million today.

Central to the complaint is the accusation that Rubin cheated Rie Rubin out of a lot of money by having her sign the agreement days before their wedding, while she was pregnant with their child, without adequately disclosing that his lawyer had represented him in a previous divorce. Rie Rubin argues in the complaint that there was therefore a conflict of interest that, along with other details, forms a basis for invalidating the agreement.

Last fall, a major controversy was stirred internally at Google when The Times reported that the tech giant had paid Rubin a $90 million exit package even though, sources told The Times, his departure was related to a sexual-misconduct accusation by a Google employee. Some 20,000 employees worldwide staged a walkout in protest of Rubin’s payout and the company’s overall handling of harassment cases, especially among executives.

At the time, Google CEO Sundar Pichai said that over the previous two years, 48 employees had been fired for sexual misconduct, 13 of whom held senior positions at the company.

Read the full complaint here: