The Fox News Cashin’ In regulars are not happy that the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Abercrombie & Fitch had violated civil rights law when it decided against hiring a young Muslim woman wearing a head scarf.

The Supreme Court ruled 8-1 against Abercrombie & Fitch this week. Apparently host Eric Bolling has been stewing ever since,

Bolling wore a large flag pin to let us know what a patriot he is. Yet, he complained that Abercrombie & Fitch was “caving to the Supreme Court.”

Panelist Michelle Fields argued on behalf of discrimination. “They should be able to choose what image they project to the public. …If this woman was applying for a job at their factory where she wasn’t a brand ambassador, I would say sure, she should be able to wear her hijab. But if she is going to represent the company and be an image of the company, well, the company gets to decide what you wear, that’s how it works.”

Actually, the U.S. Supreme Court gets to decide whether or not the company violated the law with its practices. THAT’S how it works.

“Did the Supreme Court screw this one up?” Bolling asked. Even though, not one panelist seemed to be a lawyer.

Democrat Jessica Tarlov, the lone supporter of the SCOTUS decision, said Abercrombie & Fitch has a right to hire whomever they want “but they don’t have a right to discriminate.” Unbelievably, everybody else seemed to disagree.

Bolling made the ludicrous argument that now people will claim that their sports attire is part of their religious beliefs.

BOLLING: There are a lot of people who have different feelings, have different emotions. Some would say ‘religious beliefs’ for - I don’t know, sports. Should they be able to wear a sports team uniform into Abercrombie and make sure Abercrombie makes sure they’re hired?”

But panelist Jonathan Hoenig took it a step further.

HOENIG: Why would anyone want to hire a full-time employee like this? I mean, employers are sitting ducks. …If it’s your business, you have the right to discriminate against how people talk, how people walk, it doesn’t matter.

Rather than object, Fields suggested that the job applicant deliberately set up the retailer.

FIELDS: Imagine if you go audition for a movie and you get it and then you say, “No, I can’t wear the costume because it goes against my religious beliefs. She knew what she was doing. She knew this was a “model” position. …She knew what Abercrombie was. They have basically naked people on their billboards.

Bolling helped promote this baseless accusation. “This may have been a setup,” he agreed, without looking for any evidence that it was so. “Why would a devout Muslim decide to go ahead and go for this job, other than maybe to see if they can catch them saying no and then bring it to the Supreme Court?”

“You’ve got to draw a line,” panelist Wayne Rogers said. “If it’s against our dress code, then you must not do it.”

Hoenig reiterated, “You did build that. It’s your business. You have the right to discriminate against whoever you want.”

Nobody but Tarlov disagreed.

Watch the Fox News brand of patriotism below, from the June 6 Cashin’ In.