The B.C. government is playing a dangerous game by picking a fight with Alberta in the name of “using every tool in the tool kit” to block Kinder Morgan’s approved Trans Mountain pipeline expansion project.

A key word worth repeating is approved. A smart millennial friend half-asked me yesterday: “the project was actually approved?” It was a good reminder that most people have lives that don’t involve following the complexities of big resource development projects.

Distroscale

Regardless of one’s personal views on the pipeline, it has been given a green-light to proceed by the federal cabinet after an extremely robust process conducted by the National Energy Board (NEB).

The pipeline proponent went through four years of consultation and is meeting 157 federal conditions, as well as 37 additional provincial conditions. Many of these requirements were crafted to ensure the highest possible level of environmental protection.

Story continues below This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

For example, ships carrying heavy oil (bitumen) will be double-hulled (which would have prevented the Exxon-Valdez spill) and escorted in and out of the harbour by tugs. B.C. trained pilots, who know the coast, will be on board the ships. The proponent will give the province $1 billion over 20 years to put into environmental programs. The federal government is funding two super- tugs (as part of its $500 million marine protection plan for the B.C. coast) that can get to any ship within a few hours with state-of-the-art equipment for quick containment in case of a spill.

These specifics gave some flavour for the project to my millennial friend but are not the main point. The main point is the project has been approved. And the approval process was not some fly-by-night process. It was robust and thoughtful. It was never going to make everyone happy; no decision on a major project ever does. Advocates for the Northern Gateway project, for example, were deeply disappointed when the federal government said “no” to that project the same day they said “yes” to Trans Mountain.

Now that the federal government has indeed said “yes,” the rule of law must be respected as it would be for other major decisions such as setting aside land for national parks. The pipeline project must be allowed to proceed. Failing to do so, either in practice or in spirit by creating additional delays and uncertainty, is destructive. For starters, it makes a mockery of government decision-making in Canada. It turns our robust process into some kind of kangaroo court that can’t be trusted and is open to being easily sidetracked by vocal opponents, whose main objective is decision by delay rather than decision by reasonable process.

Story continues below This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

This is clearly not in the best interests of British Columbia or Canada. British Columbians want our government to use the tools in the tool kit to look out for the interests of the province. But do we really want those tools used to vandalize the fabric of the Canadian federation? Do we want our province so flagrantly flouting federal jurisdiction? Do we want to send a loud message to the international community that British Columbia specifically, and Canada more generally, isn’t worth the risk?

More subtly, British Columbia’s behaviour further polarizes environmental debates by undermining the idea that any kind of “social licence” or compromise is achievable. For a vocal minority, this may be a good outcome. However, most Canadians are in Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s camp in believing economic growth, prosperity and jobs can go together with environmental protection.

The optimal number of big projects to say “yes” to is not zero.

In the short term, small business wineries are most visibly caught in the crossfire as Alberta fights back. But there are many others — from welders to electricians — who have made business decisions based on the project’s approval. Should they be punished for believing that the government will respect the law?

If the B.C. government does not find a way to walk things back, things will only get worse. Alberta politicians have suggested turning the existing oil pipeline on and off. This could create mayhem in the Lower Mainland. Like it or not, it’s because of the Kinder Morgan’s existing Trans Mountain pipeline that we can fill up our cars with gasoline, transport goods to supermarkets and keep our airports running. It’s easy to see how tempting it could be for an agitated Alberta to say to troublemaking B.C.: If you want to stop the pipeline expansion then perhaps you can live without what comes out of the existing one. I suspect most British Columbians would not like this reality. Most would also not like the prospect of the oil coming by rail instead.

The inescapable conclusion here is that the British Columbia government is playing a dangerous game. It’s time for them to put their tools down before they inflict damage that can’t be undone.

Laura Jones is Executive Vice-President and Chief Strategic Officer for the Canadian Federation of Independent Business.