Overall

Vision Vision

Originality Originality

Technique Technique

Impact Impact

Good day dear reader.Today I saw that artwork first as thumbnail like most of us. In that small preview I had the intention to look at this artwork . After I opened in a new tab and in full size. It has retained its charm.First I'll talk about the originality of the artwork .Originality is a point which is hard talk about. So why? Because it isn't the first landscape which a human draw. So I would talk about elements which make unique, and which not. Forest isn't something new in a landscape artwork , but isn't like in other artworks a forest clearing or deep forest. It make an effect like the house lie down next an old and worn out path. Now we move on next element. Light isn't originality as element, but good technique for it. Which elements are subjective originality´for me? I would answer it with the destroyed bridge, on cliff of rocks. Not a cliff of a lake or an endless cliff. Also the butterfly with the flowers make it unique, with that light effect. So I would give that artwork 3/5 points.Vision is hard to talk about it in landscape artwork , without an comment of artist or a photo of an original area. So I can't rate it so good as it maybe should. So I try my best and talk about theme and idea. The setting of the artwork is overall good, and give it a solid theme. They aren't any mistakes in that artwork which I would like to call out. So far I don't get any information, I'll rate vision with 2/5.Technique and creativity are the best friends of artist. Now I need to talk about the technique of that artwork. I'll talk about a few elements, and after rate technique.Let's talk about the rocks. Many artists try drawing rocks, but this rocks are rocks in my eyes. A good point at the rocks are the light and shadow effects. Shadow effect is great when we watch the rocks left of bridge, and the two a behind the house next forest. The artist don't used on kind of shadow. He have multiple steps of darkness. All that point match also for the lighting.Now I'll talk about the wooden elements, like the house and the destroyed bridge. The wooden plates aren't just colored like in other artworks. They let us see that the wooden plates are old lying along time around without a human. Moss is the element which let us see it.Butterfly are so beautiful, when we see them. Also that drawed butterfly let us think about a real butterfly. How the artist created that effect. Again is the key word light effect, this time with particles. Just good.I give the artwork 4/5 points in technique.The last point on over list is impact. A landscape let us normally see a real place. We don't no if it is a real place or just fiction of place. If I see that artwork, I feel like that I'm there at other of the bridge. Looking forward but can't cross the destroyed bridge. After looking forward I discover the butterfly just want to put out my smartphone and take a photo of it. So I believe it have good impact. That is artwork let us all feel different. So for me that are 4/5 points in impact, but I would understand if someone else see it different.So I hope you enjoyed this critique.