With loopholes big enough to drive a cement truck through, Obama will propose three-year spending freeze.



Looking to signal at least one step toward reining in huge federal budget deficits, President Barack Obama will propose a three-year freeze in non-security discretionary spending, senior administration officials said Monday.



His budget proposal, to be unveiled in part with Wednesday's State of the Union speech and in detail next week, will urge Congress to keep overall spending at $447 billion a year for agencies other than those charged with national security and mandatory-spending programs such as Social Security and Medicare.



The freeze would take effect with the 2011 fiscal year starting Oct. 1, and wouldn't affect the $787 billion economic stimulus plan already being implemented, the officials said.



It also wouldn't affect a $154 billion jobs plan pending before Congress and backed by Obama, the officials said. One aide said that plan would be exempt because it would take effect this year, before the freeze.



Administration officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to not upstage the president, said that the three-year freeze would save $250 billion over a decade — if it's approved by an election-year Congress.



After three years, the total spent would be the lowest as a percentage of the total economy in 50 years. Spending on those agencies has increased by an average of 5 percent a year since 1993, the officials said.



Still, officials acknowledged that the savings wouldn't come close to eliminating the deficit and balancing the budget. "We're not here to tell you we've solved the deficit," one official said.

Exemptions

The $154 billion jobs plan pending before Congress

Medicare



Social Security

The $787 billion economic stimulus plan already being implemented

Department of Defense

Homeland Security



Veterans Administration



International operations.



What's Covered

One eighth of the total annual budget

Repeating the Mistakes of 1937?!

This is an important issue, but I'd rather wait to address the deficit until after we see clear signs of a recovery.



Note: I have a long history of being a deficit hawk, but I don't want to see a repeat of the mistakes of 1937, see: A comment on the Deficit and National Debt

don't blow debt bubbles in the first place