Only about 350 people worldwide have ever died from H5N1

(NaturalNews) Two American researchers whose efforts to deliberately re-engineer the H5N1 avian flu virus to be more virulent and deadly to humans are now asking that a government-advised moratorium on their controversial research be lifted. According to, the duo alleges that precise details about how it developed the deadly flu strain must be made public, and that its controversial research be allowed to continue for the sake of "public health."As we reported back in early 2012, Ron Fouchier from thein the Netherlands and Yoshihiro Kawaoka from theintentionally developed a militarized strain of H5N1 avian flu capable of easily transmitting among mammals. Natural strains of H5N1, on the other hand, primarily transmit between birds and other fowl only, which means this type of flu is not that significant of a threat to humans.But for the alleged purpose of learning how H5N1mutate at some point in the future to become more of a threat to humans, Fouchier and Kawaoka deliberately induced these mutations in test ferrets with complete success. In the process, they essentially discovered a way to potentially spark a global flu pandemic with the potential to kill or seriously injure billions of people. And following their insane discovery, they actually tried to publish the recipe for this deadly strain in public journals.Concerned about the possibility that this critical information might be misused, the(NSABB), a federal advisory committee that oversees research of this nature, urged the two scientists not to publish their findings in the journalsand. And while they agreed to this recommendation initially, Fouchier and Kawaoka are now pushing to continue on with their work."Because H5N1 virus transmission studies are essential for pandemic preparedness and understanding the adaptation of influenza viruses to mammals, researchers who have approval from their governments and institutions to conduct this research safely, under appropriate biosafety and biosecurity conditions, have a public-health responsibility to resume this important work," allege the original researchers about their work.Based on the wording of this petition, you would think that H5N1 is responsible for killing at least tens of thousands of people every year, and that we must take action now to stop its spread. But in reality, H5N1 has only infected about 600 peoplesince it was first discovered in Hong Kong back in 1997. And among these 600, only about 350 ended up dying, which means roughly 24 people a year, on average, die from H5N1 infection.Contrast this with the roughly 5 ,000 Americans who die every year from food poisoning, for instance, and it becomes abundantly clear that H5N1 is hardly the serious public health threat that Fouchier, Kawaoka, and others continually claim it is. The average person is more likely to die from choking on a piece of lettuce than he or she is of ever contracting H5N1 influenza, let alone dying from it. So why all the focus on deliberately inducing H5N1 to spread among humans and cause a real pandemic?The real answer to this question is shrouded in mystery. If you believe the official explanation, researchers merely want to anticipate how H5N1mutate in the future in order to get a handle early on how to address it. It is a purely hypothetical scenario that may not ever come to pass, of course, but it is the purported reason and justification for such research, even though such research could end up being theof a deadly H5N1 outbreak in the very near future.And this brings us to the second and more sinister explanation. Researchers could be deliberately engineering a super-deadly form of H5N1 for the unstated purpose of eventually releasing it into the wild in order to trigger a pandemic. This is not that far-fetched when considering that the researchers involved in this work are carefully studying how many times the already-mutated virus needs to spread between mammals on its own in order to naturally mutate again into an even more deadly virus."The case fatality rate of wild H5N1 in the WHO () database is nearly 60 percent ... So if a strain of H5N1 with that fatality rate were engineered to spread like seasonal flu , hundreds of millions of people's lives would be at risk," Thomas Inglesby, Director and CEO of the Center for Biosecurity at the, is quoted as saying by"Even a strain a hundred times less fatal would place at risk millions of people's lives," he added.To learn more about how to protect yourself from militarized flu strains, check out the special report,