Peter Strzok: My Texts Promising To Stop Trump Were Just Intimate Messages Between Intimate Friends

He was speaking behind closed doors to the House committee looking into this.

Mark Meadows doesn't believe that an "intimate message between intimate friends" means that there's no bias here. In fact, he thinks that an "intimate message between intimate friends" is usually the unadorned truth about your intentions:

Meadows disputes Strzok saying he was not biased. And he rejected the explanation that Strozk�s texts of wanting to �stop� Trump was just an �intimate exchange.�



�If you have an intimate personal conversation between two people - that normally would show the intent ...� — Manu Raju (@mkraju) June 27, 2018





Meadows also alludes to information which hasn't been revealed yet:

�There is new information that was not included in the IG report,� Meadows said, but he would not say what it was — Manu Raju (@mkraju) June 27, 2018





Remember, he mentioned to IG Horowitz that there was "growing evidence" that FBI interview form 302s (the only record of FBI interviews) had been "edited and changed" in order to make a case against Trump aides, and similarly edited and changed to clear Hillary aides of prosecutorial danger.