The New Physiocratic League is a political-economic framework and certification body with a platform based on the philosophy of Georgism, centered around a particular type of tax shift. While there are some similarities in policies and approach to the Andrew Yang platform, it is not enough to officially endorse him officially (particularly due to the absence of an LVT in his platform). The LVT shift is needed with utmost urgency, before other policies are enacted.

With that being said, Andrew Yang is still the most preferred candidate of the TNPL for the Democratic nomination for the following reasons:

Concrete policy / solution focused, rather than political/rhetorical. Seems he would be open to TNPL policies

Awareness of Georgism (when asked his thoughts on the philosophy, he said he likes it)

His VAT-UBI proposal, while different from TNPL’s Three Pillars, is the closest policy any candidate has proposed

He is helping bring the discussion of such proposals into the mainstream

His tendency is towards more market-oriented solutions, and away from bureaucracy & state-control (unlike the other candidates)

Please share this message and let’s hope for a positive outcome from the first debates.