Paris Saint Germain – Manchester City 2:2

2:2

This was a match between two teams in similar long term situations but have had very different recent history. Both sides have been trying and failing to achieve European success since Middle-East investment a few years ago. However PSG are a side that have dominated domestically this season, winning the Ligue 1 title early last month while City have been on a dreadful patch of form since announcing that Pep Guardiola this season. With just one point between them and their cross-city rivals in fifth, winning the Champions League may be their only chance of making sure they’re playing in the tournament next season.

Both sides had pretty high-profile absentees through injury. PSG were still without Verratti and Pastore while City were missing Kompany, Toure and Sterling.

Les Parisiens’ Possession Game

It was no surprise that PSG dominated possession, having 65% of the ball during the match. In possession Thiago Motta had an instrumental role, dropping playing between the centre-backs and aiming to play through the centre of the pitch. PSG’s front three were usually quite narrow in the centre and halfspaces while the full-backs kept PSG’s width. PSG’s front three were roaming and interchanging, looking to receive the ball in between City’s defensive and midfield lines. Ibrahimovic played what was almost a false-9 role, dropping deep to link up possession in front of City’s midfield line as well dropping just behind City’s midfield line, looking to receive passes through the centre from Motta. This 3v2 central overload was absolutely essential in PSG’s possession game, and allowed them to penetrate City’s midfield line centrally.

Above is an example of PSG’s central dominance in midfield. Ibrahimovic played a more involved role in possession than he usually does. He moved into the halfspaces and flank to create overloads, while also creating 2v1s on Fernando with Matuidi, allowing the frenchman to run into the space in between the lines with the ball at his feet. Ibrahimovic’s deeper base position meant that PSG had a 3v2 overload with Luiz, Silva and Motta vs De Bruyne and Aguero on the first line, and then Matuidi, Rabiot and Ibrahimovic vs Fernando and Fernandinho on the second line.

PSGs positionally fluid and interchanging front three did cause Manchester City’s man-orientated back four lots of problems, and I’ll go into greater detail later about how calamitous they were at times. They didn’t know whether to follow the players’ lateral and vertical movements and couldn’t deal with third-man runs.

The above video shows how PSG’s rotation ripped apart City’s central midfield. The fact De Bruyne stayed advanced in City’s 4-4-2 meant that Fernandinho and Fernando were overrun and huge gaps were left in the centre of City’s midfield.

What they could have improved

Despite their dominance in possession, PSG weren’t overly productive in creating chances from their organised possession phase. One problem they had is that the overloads I’ve talked about on the first and second lines of City’s press, but then had nobody on the last line looking to make runs in behind the City defence. When Ibrahimovic found himself turning with the ball in between the lines, Cavani was too wide or not stretching City’s last line. This often meant they were forced to play put to their fullbacks in the final third.

Also, their intelligence on the ball was lacking at times, particularly from David Luiz, meant that they weren’t as effective at getting the ball into dangerous zones. They too often played to the feet of their fullbacks on the flank, a pass that really isn’t ideal unless followed by a quick pass from the fullback into feet in the centre.

PSG's intelligence on-the-ball was lacking at times. pic.twitter.com/fRYKKJtQwq — TT (@flyingwingback) April 7, 2016

Manchester City in Defensive Transition

One of the best chapters in Marti Perarnau’s Pep Confidential is the one in which Pep describes to Perarnau about how important it is that one of the primary focuses of your attacking play is making sure your team isn’t vulnerable in defensive transition. There are four things Guardiola says are vital to reduce the threat of the opposition counter-attack: don’t lose the ball in key midfield areas, use a 15-pass build-up to ensure your team is in a structure fit to deal with a defensive transition, put pressure on the free-man (the first man to receive the ball after the turnover) in the event of a loss of possession, and finally try to anticipate who this man will be and make sure he is covered. It’s an unrealistic expectation for every manager to follow these principles however Manchester City abandoned all of them, and were unbelievably vulnerable in defensive transition. Below is one of many examples of this:

In attack, Manchester City were extremely narrow due to David Silva moving into central areas from his left-midfield position, this meant that they had little space to play in and were forced to move the ball quickly and use individualism to try to go droit au but (‘straight to goal’). This is pretty typical of a Premier League team.

City’s Defensive Disorganisation

City’s lack of leadership and direction with Kompany missing was evident. It was a mix of poor communication and strategy that lead to their dreadful defensive organisation. As I have mentioned, their man-orientations in midfield meant that PSG found it easy to open up spaces. City’s back four were very compact but often left little space between the back four at the expense of allowing PSG lots of space around the side of them, especially due to the fact that Navas and Silva didn’t move back next to their fullback quick enough in defence, and failed to track PSGs runners.

The first video in this article is a perfect example of this as it the video below.

Calamitous defending from Manchester City. Their 18-yard offside line causing them problems as per usual. pic.twitter.com/1qie6lNrKp — TT (@flyingwingback) April 7, 2016

The video shows City’s compact defensive shape and how they’ve shifted towards the ball. Anyone that watches City regularly knows that they pin an offside line on the 18-yard box line and I criticise it every time I write about them so I won’t again, but the fact that they have an offside trap but no pressure on the ball means that PSG have time to find passes into the penalty area.

City defended in a 4-4-2 in the match which is fine when pressing PSG’s possession around the halfway line, but it is pretty crazy to leave both De Bruyne and Aguero well ahead of the ball when defending the final third away in Paris. Fernandinho and Fernando had to press PSGs midfielders in possession, leaving lots of space in between the lines for PSG’s narrow front three to drop in to.

Conclusion

Manchester City will be absolutely delighted with the 2-2 scoreline going into the second leg. They were outplayed in most departments however PSG’s failure to create spaces on the last line meant that they didn’t create the chances to match their possession.

I expect Manchester City to take more of a studious approach in possession at the Etihad, which would provide PSG with a challenge they aren’t used to encountering in Ligue 1 but also give the French side an opportunity to counter attack.