Pathfinder is not my favorite version of D&D, and probably doesn't even crack my top 10 list of RPGs. I don't think it's a better game than 4e--I think they're about equal, with each hitting different buttons for me (both good and bad).

I totally hate rolling for stats, but I also greatly dislike the way point buy works.

I completely hate the way magic items work. I hate the way traps work. I hate the way perception works. I hate the very concept of a "daily" resource.

I don't like the APs, either, but even more extreme, I don't like running other people's material at all, so, I don't like any module or published setting whatsoever.

I think PFS and "living" games in general are destroying the art of GMing by slowly forcing the death of table variation and acting as if it was a good thing. I think it will ultimately make roleplaying as a hobby more accessible, but also less worthy of accessibility as GM quality degrades.

I absolutely hate the very concept of RAW, and frequently debate on the forum making extensive use of RAW in my arguments in order to show the absolute folly of it all. In truth, while I think the forum is a wonderful tool to elicit advice on what a rule should be, I think it is utterly ridiculous to elicit advice on what a rule actually is.