Am I the only one who realized that this is a Poe?

Come one people, anyone can ask a stupid question but only an idiot ASSumes that the asker is a Christian. It's more likely that it is a smart-alec punk who just wants to give all the Atheists a straw man to burn in effigy. You know they can't win against a real Christian.

I really like this answer:

A frog turning into a prince is a fairy tale, add millions of years and it is called EVOLUTION but it is STILL A FAIRY TALE!

@FXM, the theory of evolution is that the DNA of a species will change to form a completely new species. So you would have to give an example of how a moth turned into a butterfly. Moth's in a birch forest have the genes to be born either black or white or various mottled shades of grey. The population of the expressed gene which allows the moth to escape predators will of course be more numerous, yet the DNA does not change. You take those white moths and put them in a forrest blackened by smoke and the opposite occurs from the same DNA.

A cave fish was found to be the same species as a sea fish. The cave fish looked very different... no eyes, different bone structure, smaller adult size, and even the behavior was different as they did not sleep as much. But genetically they were found to be the same fish species. Subsequent generation born in an aquarium looked more and more like the sea fish. This is nothing more than PROOF that the changes in fossil structure are not evidence of changes in DNA. Everything on this earth has the same DNA that God created it with. Only the expression of the genes changes based on heredity and environmental factors. So while it may be possible for an elephant to become small as a dog due to environmental changes, the DNA will still be of the same species. Just look at the species of dog to see what a wide variety of expression is possible using the same base DNA. Yet there are limitations. When breeders have reached these limitations, the new generation of dogs either become sterile or revert to previously expressed genes. It's fascinating science to explore the range that God programmed into our DNA, but it is fallacy to believe that man and ape ever shared a common ancestor. The variation of our species is as varied as it gets.

You can take two books written by the same author and you can look at their similarities and suppose that over millions of years the letters of an ancestor book changed in such a way and diverged to form two or more different books that are now different books with similarities, or you can believe what the author tells you, that he wrote two different books using the same letters of the alphabet.

Which is more likely to be the case?

God told us that He created us. Why do some people reject God? Only because they don't want to give up sin. It is the ostrich head in the sand defense. If they deny God fervently enough, they hope He won't be real. But He is. Millions of people testify to having a personal relationship with God today. How can anyone continue to ignore that?