A potty-mouthed Long Island judge who sent “profane” emails — including one where he called a lawyer a “c–t on wheels” — should be yanked from the bench, a panel ruled.

Paul Senzer, a part-time Northport Village Court judge, fired off a total of nine “sexist” emails to a former housekeeper he was repping as a lawyer between October 2014 and February 2015, according to Commission on Judicial Conduct.

In some of the missives, the crass jurist called the client’s daughter a “b-tch” and an “a–hole” — and slammed her attorney as a “c–t on wheels,” according to the commission’s Oct. 9 finding.

In another, he allegedly referred to the lawyer by one of her body parts — mockingly calling her, “eyelashes.”

The panel recommended Senzer be removed for using “sexist” and “otherwise degrading language” while communicating with clients.

“It is simply unacceptable for a judge to demean women with vile and otherwise abhorrent language,” commission administrator Robert Tembeckjian said in a statement.

“Doing so reveals prejudice and undermines public confidence in the administration of justice. It should be clear that a person who cavalierly uses gender-biased slurs does not belong on the bench.”

In other e-mails, he also called the client’s ex-husband and daughter: “THE TWO SCUMBAGS WERE SERVED.”

Senzer admitted at a recent hearing that the language “reflect[s] very poorly on me as an attorney and obviously, as a judge” and said he has “profound and deep regret.”

But his attorney, David Besso, said he plans to appeal the finding — saying it’s unfair and unprecedented.

“The decision by the commission is a complete miscarriage of justice. Judge Senzer has a completely unblemished record on the bench,” he told The Post.

“The charges that were made by the commission concern his activities as a private lawyer and had absolutely nothing to do with his judicial activities. This is the first time in the history of the commission that a judge has been removed from the bench for private conversations with his client,” he said.

In 2002, Senzer was issued a warning by the panel for making a sarcastic remark to a defendant and his mother while presiding over a marijuana case.

Senzer, who has held the position since 1994 and earns $10,000 a year, didn’t immediately return a request for comment.