Sen. Tim Scott Timothy (Tim) Eugene ScottAuthor Ryan Girdusky: RNC worked best when highlighting 'regular people' as opposed to 'standard Republicans' Now is the time to renew our focus on students and their futures GOP lobbyists pleasantly surprised by Republican convention MORE (R-S.C.) tore into fellow Republican Rep. Steve King Steven (Steve) Arnold KingGOP leader: 'There is no place for QAnon in the Republican Party' Loomer win creates bigger problem for House GOP Win by QAnon believer creates new headaches for House GOP MORE (Iowa) on Friday after King questioned how terms such as “white supremacist” and "white nationalist" were offensive, writing in an op-ed that Republicans with opinions like King's damage the party and the nation as a whole.

Scott wrote in an op-ed for The Washington Post that the party often struggles with “civility and fairness,” pointing to King’s comments, which drew swift blowback from conservatives and Democrats.

ADVERTISEMENT

“When people with opinions similar to King’s open their mouths, they damage not only the Republican Party and the conservative brand but also our nation as a whole,” Scott wrote. “They want to be treated with fairness for some perceived slights but refuse to return the favor to those on the other side.”

“Some in our party wonder why Republicans are constantly accused of racism — it is because of our silence when things like this are said,” he continued.

King drew sharp backlash on Thursday following the publication of an interview in The New York Times in which he questioned when the terms "white supremacist" and "white nationalist" became "offensive."

Facing blowback, King later sought to defend his remarks, dubbing himself simply a "nationalist" and attempting to offer a distinction between nationalist and nationalism in favor of white people.

“King’s comments are not conservative views but separate views that should be ridiculed at every turn possible,” Scott wrote for the Post. “Conservative principles mean equal opportunity for all to succeed, regardless of what you look like or where you are from.”

Silence from the Republican Party is “no longer acceptable,” Scott wrote.

King, known for his hard-line views on immigration, has pushed fiercely for President Trump Donald John TrumpHR McMaster says president's policy to withdraw troops from Afghanistan is 'unwise' Cast of 'Parks and Rec' reunite for virtual town hall to address Wisconsin voters Biden says Trump should step down over coronavirus response MORE’s long-desired border wall. Trump's push for billions in funding for a wall along the southern border triggered a partial government shutdown last month, which has continued for 21 days as the White House negotiates funding with Congress.

The South Carolina senator added that the Republican debate over immigration has “become conflated with a perceived racism against brown and black people.” Scott argued that he supports border security to boost legal immigration, saying migrants from any country should face consequences for violating immigration law.

King addressed the backlash during a speech on the House floor on Friday afternoon, describing his choice to interview with the Times as a "freshman mistake."

"One phrase in that long article has created an unnecessary controversy. That was my mistake," King said.

"I regret the heartburn that has poured forth upon this Congress and this country and especially in my state and in my congressional district," he added, stating that he does not endorse white nationalism.

King’s divisive comments about immigration have led to scrutiny in past years. He once tweeted that diversity is not America's strength.

In 2018, he also defended his association with a far-right Austrian group with links to the Nazi Party and hard-line views on immigration.