John Noonan is a Republican national security analyst who advised both Jeb Bush and Mitt Romney, and he is beyond alarmed at the prospect of Donald Trump being in charge of America’s nuclear arsenal.

Noonan served in the Air Force and has firsthand experience with handling nuclear material, and a report that Trump repeatedly asked why he can’t just use nukes really drove him to a pretty angry tweetstorm:

1. I cant get this in one tweet. So bear with me as I air some laundry here on Scarborough's claim Trump's interested in nuclear First Use — John Noonan (@noonanjo) August 3, 2016

2. Pulled 300 nuclear alerts, 100 ft under the Wyoming turf. Job is serious and full of serious people. — John Noonan (@noonanjo) August 3, 2016

3. When we went into ICBM training, we went through a battery of tests and interviews. Are you sane? Are you willing to turn your key? — John Noonan (@noonanjo) August 3, 2016

4. I see how those might sound at odds. — John Noonan (@noonanjo) August 3, 2016

5. But the whole idea behind nuclear deterrence is that you don't use the damn things. So I thought the mission credible and worthy. — John Noonan (@noonanjo) August 3, 2016

6. There are a hell of a lot of bad actors out there who have nukes. They are restrained only by our ability to instantly lay waste to them. — John Noonan (@noonanjo) August 3, 2016

7. The nuke triad, which Trump doesn't have a clue about, has been the single greatest contributor to global peace for decades. You heard me — John Noonan (@noonanjo) August 3, 2016

8. I dont know if Scarborough is telling whole truth here. Anonymous sources suck. BUT… if he is… buckle the hell up. — John Noonan (@noonanjo) August 3, 2016

9. Because Trump would be undoing 6 decades of proven deterrence theory. The purpose of nukes is that they are never used. Trump disagrees? — John Noonan (@noonanjo) August 3, 2016

10. This would be the single greatest strategic shift in US national security in decades. In a Trump Presidency, our foreign policy — John Noonan (@noonanjo) August 3, 2016

11. ….would be this. "Leave our alliances, fall back on a nuclear first use policy." Does he understand just how F'ing dangerous that is? — John Noonan (@noonanjo) August 3, 2016

12. But what really concerns me, as a former nuke guy, is the idea of a narcissist walking around with nuclear authenticators. — John Noonan (@noonanjo) August 3, 2016

13. I could sit 100ft underground, on alert, knowing that the POTUS would not make me do my duty — not unless it was absolute last resort — John Noonan (@noonanjo) August 3, 2016

14. But imagine having to turn launch keys not knowing if we were under attack or if it was b/c foreign leader said a mean thing on twitter — John Noonan (@noonanjo) August 3, 2016

15. The power is there to kill millions. Permanently alter the geopolitical landscape. It is a sacred, sobering responsibility. — John Noonan (@noonanjo) August 3, 2016

16. Idea that nukes would be used, say over Raqqa or Mosul, simply because we have no more allies and it's a simple, easy fix is nauseating — John Noonan (@noonanjo) August 3, 2016

17. Simply signaling that you're open to using strategic weapons as a tactical solution rewrites the rule book. Russia, China, others will — John Noonan (@noonanjo) August 3, 2016

18. respond. Nuclear deterrence is about balance. Trump is an elephant jumping up and down on one side of the scale. So damn dangerous. — John Noonan (@noonanjo) August 3, 2016

19. But geopolitics aside, I can't get my mind off the young officers on nuke alert right now. Wondering if they'll soon answer to a madman. — John Noonan (@noonanjo) August 3, 2016

20. And be asked to do a duty that should morally be asked of no human being, ever. //end — John Noonan (@noonanjo) August 3, 2016

Trump has been all over the place on the question of nukes, and has made some bold pronouncements on the subject.

[featured image via Gage Skidmore]

— —

Follow Josh Feldman on Twitter: @feldmaniac

Have a tip we should know? [email protected]