By Brandon Turbeville

Despite Western claims that the armed invasion against the legitimate and secular Syrian government was organic native to Syria, the facts have repeatedly proven just the opposite. For instance, it has long been known that, from day one, armed groups had been organized, trained, armed, and directed by the intelligence services of Western countries.

One such revelation was made in 2012 when emails from the “global intelligence” company Stratfor were procured and subsequently released by WikiLeaks which revealed that Western intelligence agents were on the ground in Syria training armed jihadists for sectarian and destabilization purposes long before it was actually admitted by the respective governments.

The emails recovered by WikiLeaks span a period between July, 2004 and December, 2011.

Stratfor, posing as an “intelligence publisher” provides confidential intelligence services to government agencies like the US Marines, US Department of Homeland Security, and the US Defense Intelligence Agency as well as large corporations such as Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, and Bhopal’s Dow Chemical Co.

WikiLeaks claims that the string of emails show Stratfor’s “web of informers, pay-of structure, payment laundering techniques and psychological methods.”

One of the emails sent internally in December, 2011 within the corporation entitled “INSIGHT – military intervention in Syria, post withdrawal status of forces,” deals with the subject of special ops being involved in Syria specifically. During the course of a meeting with “four other guys at the Lt. Col. Level, including one French and one British representative who are liaising with the US currently out of DC.”

One of the emails reads,

After a couple hours of talking, they [“four other guys at the Lieutenant Colonel level, including one French and one British representative who are liaising with the US currently out of DC”] said without saying that SOF teams (presumably from US, UK, France, Jordan, Turkey) are already on the ground focused on recce missions and training opposition forces. One Air Force intel guy (US) said very carefully that there isn’t much of a Free Syrian Army to train right now anyway, but all the operations being done now are being done out of ‘prudence.’ The way it was put to me was, ‘look at this way – the level of information known on Syrian OrBat this month is the best it’s been since 2001.’ They have been told to prepare contingencies and be ready to act within 2-3 months, but they still stress that this is all being done as contingency planning, not as a move toward escalation. I kept pressing on the question of what these SOF teams would be working toward, and whether this would lead to an eventual air campaign to give a Syrian rebel group cover. They pretty quickly distanced themselves from that idea, saying that the idea ‘hypothetically’ is to commit guerrilla attacks, assassination campaigns, try to break the back of the Alawite forces, elicit collapse from within. There wouldn’t be a need for air cover, and they wouldn’t expect these Syrian rebels to be marching in columns anyway.

Notice not only the admission that Western special ops forces were already on the ground training armed groups and providing them with intel, but that they were doing so with the express purpose of “break the back of Alawite forces” committing guerrilla attacks, engaging in targeted assassinations, and causing the government to collapse.

But this is not the first nor is it the only bit of evidence we have showing that Western special forces were on the ground in Syria prior to and during the destabilization campaign that began in earnest in 2011.

One article from French newspaper Le Figaro reports that American, Israeli, and Jordanian commandos crossed the Syrian border only days before the chemical attack in Eastern Ghouta, which the West ridiculously attempted to blame on Assad. As Le Figaro reported,

According to our information, the regime’s opponents, supervised by Jordanian, Israeli, and American commandos moving towards Damascus since mid-August.

The report also stated that

the first trained in guerrilla warfare by the Americans in Jordan, Syrian [rebel] troops reportedly entered into action since mid-August in southern Syria, in the region of Deraa. A first group of 300 men, probably supported by Israeli and Jordanian commandos, as well as men of the CIA, had crossed the border on August 17.

In other words, no more than three days before the chemical attacks in Eastern Ghouta, which all evidence shows was the handiwork of the death squads, 300 trained “rebels” and possibly Western special forces themselves were advancing toward Damascus.

The contingents apparently were deployed in two waves with the second group of fighters entering the Daraa region on August 19th.

This, of course, was not the only report of Western special forces troops being discovered operating inside Syria. Indeed, it was reported early on in the Syrian destabilization effort that 13 French military officers acting as mercenaries/death squad participants were captured by the Syrian government, all the while the mainstream Western media reported the events as “peaceful protest” and a grassroots level organic Syrian uprising against an oppressive regime.

Read the Stratfor email below (all misspellings appear in original):

INSIGHT – military intervention in Syria, post withdrawal status of forces

Released on 2012-03-06 07:00 GMT

INSIGHT – military intervention in Syria, post withdrawal status of

forces

A few points I wanted to highlight from meetings today —

I spent most of the afternoon at the Pentagon with the USAF strategic

studies group – guys who spend their time trying to understand and explain

to the USAF chief the big picture in areas where they’re operating in. It

was just myself and four other guys at the Lieutenant Colonel level,

including one French and one British representative who are liaising with

the US currently out of DC.

They wanted to grill me on the strategic picture on Syria, so after that I

got to grill them on the military picture. There is still a very low level

of understanding of what is actually at stake in Syria, what’s the

strategic interest there, the Turkish role, the Iranian role, etc. After a

couple hours of talking, they said without saying that SOF teams

(presumably from US, UK, France, Jordan, Turkey) are already on the ground

focused on recce missions and training opposition forces. One Air Force

intel guy (US) said very carefully that there isn’t much of a Free Syrian

Army to train right now anyway, but all the operations being done now are

being done out of ‘prudence.’ The way it was put to me was, ‘look at this

way – the level of information known on Syrian OrBat this month is the

best it’s been since 2001.’ They have been told to prepare contingencies

and be ready to act within 2-3 months, but they still stress that this is

all being done as contingency planning, not as a move toward escalation.

I kept pressing on the question of what these SOF teams would be working

toward, and whether this would lead to an eventual air camapign to give a

Syrian rebel group cover. They pretty quickly distanced themselves from

that idea, saying that the idea ‘hypothetically’ is to commit guerrilla

attacks, assassination campaigns, try to break the back of the Alawite

forces, elicit collapse from within. There wouldn’t be a need for air

cover, and they wouldn’t expect these Syrian rebels to be marching in

columns anyway.

They emphasized how the air campaign in Syria makes Libya look like a

piece of cake. Syrian air defenses are a lot more robust and are much

denser, esp around Damascus and on the borders with Israel, Turkey. THey

are most worried about mobile air defenses, particularly the SA-17s that

they’ve been getting recently. It’s still a doable mission, it’s just not

an easy one.

The main base they would use is Cyprus, hands down. Brits and FRench would

fly out of there. They kept stressing how much is stored at Cyprus and how

much recce comes out of there. The group was split on whether Turkey would

be involved, but said Turkey would be pretty critical to the mission to

base stuff out of there. EVen if Turkey had a poltiical problem with

Cyprus, they said there is no way the Brits and the FRench wouldn’t use

Cyprus as their main air force base. Air Force Intel guy seems pretty

convinced that the Turks won’t participate (he seemed pretty pissed at

them.)

There still seems to be a lot of confusion over what a military

intervention involving an air campaign would be designed to achieve. It

isn’t clear cut for them geographically like in Libya, and you can’t just

create an NFZ over Homs, Hama region. This would entail a countrywide SEAD

campaign lasting the duration of the war. They dont believe air

intervention would happen unless there was enough media attention on a

massacre, like the Ghadafi move against Benghazi. They think the US would

have a high tolerance for killings as long as it doesn’t reach that very

public stage. Theyre also questiioning the skills of the Syrian forces

that are operating the country’s air defenses currently and how

signfiicant the Iranian presence is there. Air Force Intel guy is most

obsessed with the challenge of taking out Syria’s ballistic missile

capabilities and chem weapons. With Israel rgiht there and the regime

facing an existential crisis, he sees that as a major complication to any

military intervention.

The post 2011 SOFA with Iraq is still being negotiated. These guys were

hoping that during Biden’s visit that he would announce a deal with

Maliki, but no such luck. They are gambling ont he idea that the Iraqis

remember the iran-iraq war and that maliki is not going to want to face

the threat of Iranian jets entering Iraqi air space. THey say that most

US fighter jets are already out of Iraq and transferred to Kuwait. They

explained that’s the beauty of the air force, the base in Kuwait is just a

hop, skip and jump away from their bases in Europe, ie. very easy to

rapidly build up when they need to. They don’t seem concerned about the

US ability to restructure its forces to send a message to Iran. They gave

the example of the USS Enterprise that was supposed to be out of

commission already and got extended another couple years to send to the

gulf. WHen the US withdraws, we’ll have at least 2 carriers in the gulf

out of centcom and one carrier in the Med out of EuCom. I asked if the

build-up in Kuwait and the carrier deployments are going to be enough to

send a message to Iran that the US isn’t going anywhere. They responded

that Iran will get the message if they read the Centcom Web Site. STarting

Jan. 1 expect them to be publishing all over the place where the US is

building up.

Another concern they have about an operation in Syria is whether Iran

could impede operations out of Balad air force base in Iraq.

The French representative was of hte opinion that Syria won’t be a

libya-type situation in that France would be gung-ho about going in. Not

in an election year. The UK rep also emphasized UK reluctance but said

that the renegotiation of the EU treaty undermines the UK role and that UK

would be looking for ways to reassert itself on the continent ( i dont

really think a syria campaign is the way to do that.) UK guy mentioned as

an aside that the air force base commander at Cyprus got switched out from

a maintenance guy to a guy that flew Raptors, ie someone that understands

what it means to start dropping bombs. He joked that it was probably a

coincidence.

Prior to that, I had a meeting with an incoming Kuwaiti diplomat (will be

coded as KU301.) His father was high up in the regime, always by the

CP’s/PM’s side. The diplo himself still seems to be getting his feet wet

in DC (the new team just arrived less than 2 weeks ago,) but he made

pretty clear that Kuwait was opening the door to allowing US to build up

forces as needed. THey already have a significant presence there, and a

lot of them will be on 90-day rotations. He also said that the SOFA that

the US signs with Baghdad at the last minute will be worded in such a way

that even allowing one trainer in the country can be construed to mean

what the US wants in terms of keeping forces in Iraq. Overall, I didnt get

the impression from him that Kuwait is freaked out about the US leaving.

Everyhting is just getting rearranged. The Kuwaitis used to be much

better at managing their relations with Iran, but ever since that spy ring

story came out a year ago, it’s been bad. He doesn’t think Iran has

significant covert capabililiteis in the GCC states, though they are

trying. Iranian activity is mostly propaganda focused. He said that while

KSA and Bahrain they can deal with it as needed and black out the media,

Kuwait is a lot more open and thus provides Iran with more oppotunity to

shape perceptions (he used to work in inforamtion unit in Kuwait.) He says

there is a sig number of kuwaitis that listen to Iranian media like Al

Alam especially.

On the Kuwaiti political scene – the government is having a harder time

dealing with a more emboldened opposition, but the opposition is still

extremely divided, esp among the Islamists. The MPs now all have to go

back to their tribes to rally support for the elections to take place in

Feb. Oftentimes an MP in Kuwait city will find out that he has lost

support back home with the tribe, and so a lot of moeny is handed out.The

govt is hoping that with a clean slate they can quiet the opposition down.

A good way of managing the opposition he said is to refer cases to the

courts, where they can linger forever. good way for the govt to buy time.

He doesnt believe the Arab League will take significant action against

Syria – no one is interested in military intervention. they just say it to

threaten it.

Brandon Turbeville writes for Activist Post – article archive here – He is the author of seven books, Codex Alimentarius — The End of Health Freedom, 7 Real Conspiracies, Five Sense Solutions and Dispatches From a Dissident, volume 1 and volume 2, The Road to Damascus: The Anglo-American Assault on Syria, The Difference it Makes: 36 Reasons Why Hillary Clinton Should Never Be President, and Resisting The Empire: The Plan To Destroy Syria And How The Future Of The World Depends On The Outcome. Turbeville has published over 1000 articles on a wide variety of subjects including health, economics, government corruption, and civil liberties. Brandon Turbeville’s radio show Truth on The Tracks can be found every Monday night 9 pm EST at UCYTV. His website is BrandonTurbeville.com He is available for radio and TV interviews. Please contact activistpost (at) gmail.com.

This article may be freely shared in part or in full with author attribution and source link.

Support us at Patreon. Follow us on Minds, Steemit, SoMee, BitChute, Facebook and Twitter. Ready for solutions? Subscribe to our premium newsletter Counter Markets.