Eager to seize on anything that could explain away Donald Trump’s victory, on Monday, all three network morning shows promoted the left’s latest excuse that false stories being shared on Facebook tilted the election in the President-Elect’s favor.

On NBC’s Today, correspondent Jo Ling Kent announced: “Facebook now under fire. Critics say it allowed fake news to spread on the platform, potentially reaching millions of people, creating echo chambers and unfairly influencing the presidential election.” The irony of the liberal media complaining about the creation of “echo chambers” was missed in the report that followed.

Kent declared: “President-Elect Donald Trump, with his more than 14 million Twitter followers and growing, now crediting social media for propelling his campaign over Hillary Clinton....While Trump praises social media, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg now being forced to fend off criticism that the site allows fake news articles about Trump and Clinton to be shared online.”

<<< Please support MRC's NewsBusters team with a tax-deductible contribution today. >>>

She quoted the Facebook founder dismissing the notion that such stories swung the election:

Taking to his own page, the 32-year-old posted a long defense of Facebook, saying he doesn't want the company to become the arbiter of truth. Saying, quote, “Of all the content on Facebook, more than 99% of what people see is authentic. Overall, this makes it extremely unlikely hoaxes changed the outcome of this election in one direction or the other.”

A soundbite ran of City University of New York journalism professor Jeff Jarvis lecturing: “We're always going have fake news, we're always going to have lies, we're always going to have idiocies out there. The only way to deal with that is to try to pump in reliable information, true information, reasonable and fact-based information.”

On ABC’s Good Morning America, fill-in co-host Amy Robach proclaimed: “And now to Facebook boss Mark Zuckerberg, he is firing back against accusations that fake stories on the site influenced the election. He insists they did not, but is vowing to take action against them.”

Technology contributor Becky Worley reported on false “inflammatory stories” about both candidates, but made it clear that conservatives were the problem: “A study by Buzzfeed showed top left-wing sites published false or misleading stories about 19% of the time. But top right-wing conservative sites published almost twice as many hoax stories, at 38%.”

Co-host George Stephanopoulos touted “some real soul-searching at Facebook.” Worley explained Zuckerberg’s concerns:

And he said he wants more options for pushing accurate information to the top of our Facebook feed and possibly pushing inaccurate stories way down so that they’re seen less. But then, there's a big concern about those judgment calls. In his words, should Facebook itself become the arbiters of truth? Do they want to be fact-checkers? So here’s the question, is Facebook just a digital platform? We can say, we can post anything we want. Or is Facebook bound by the rules of journalism and editorial responsibility? That's a big issue that may influence this company’s future for a while.

Facebook’s judgment was called into question back in May, when it was revealed that the social network was censoring conservative stories from its news feed. The networks covered the controversy, but never examined their own political bias.

Monday’s CBS This Morning only provided a news brief on the topic, with co-host Norah O’Donnell telling viewers:

The New York Times says executives at Facebook are questioning the social network’s influence on the outcome of the election. Some workers at Facebook reportedly are worried about the spread of racist memes. Facebook is accused of also spreading fake news stories. In response, CEO Mark Zuckerberg said they’re making progress and, quote, “Our goal is to show people the content they will find most meaningful, and people want accurate news.”

Given the overwhelming media opposition to Trump and the fact that journalists got their analysis of the campaign so thoroughly wrong, one would think they might be a little more hesitant casting blame.

Here are transcripts of the NBC and ABC November 14 reports: