Download raw source

Delivered-To: john.podesta@gmail.com Received: by 10.25.24.226 with SMTP id 95csp1136408lfy; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 09:23:40 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.140.23.81 with SMTP id 75mr61212446qgo.35.1451928220046; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 09:23:40 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: <slatham@hillaryclinton.com> Received: from mail-qg0-x22b.google.com (mail-qg0-x22b.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22b]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y206si23276445qka.77.2016.01.04.09.23.39 for <john.podesta@gmail.com> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Jan 2016 09:23:40 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of slatham@hillaryclinton.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22b as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22b; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of slatham@hillaryclinton.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22b as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=slatham@hillaryclinton.com; dkim=pass header.i=@hillaryclinton.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=hillaryclinton.com Received: by mail-qg0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id o11so256581126qge.2 for <john.podesta@gmail.com>; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 09:23:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hillaryclinton.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=I2iqbHmMmsfm8QbMjSQrGnlcHPN46q7wrgnsKLVGlE4=; b=PxKflVTw8E0aFwECOUTwLFZKViDnO55QyYtcK4ztzM8BybJiw3gOSlLDwPiudCK8tZ xusHxy3MbPZg8iS4fUfuAxDQERpH3nfxpX/1eJU2NbhN1ZXlgSWVTM+F57jYq8oPbJ7v O38um1pdpVvlgghV41z4GHQoO2op+3hXcJhTg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=I2iqbHmMmsfm8QbMjSQrGnlcHPN46q7wrgnsKLVGlE4=; b=L/zMRUmlnv4aRVtCS2WYDJALrcZhVMhpGeUQUQJDLTESysoGO4i0B5YgbnpvCTJeFe 5mdmcWGm/tC9JjPNdA6CG+IuXnlQ6MAFAj1pQDfFETTDtiDyAp3GxMVNglbx6gWQdxdP 9iSorIqOSiGVWu7A9xYdybApq5aIXRo+yotD1w2I6HkyqJj7DiphxDKunNRget4QVvhb SG9gAVo+XqLkgqD6VBeaONP7pW7LmopYKkRLE+rGtJJkQBQ6Pt33ar5RJbnnUvxR0Eu1 ajNsjn2pZwylokRNYgsRRnM7NfNvgzbHAU3CzfnktJU5+ZuCM31MdaUtlpVatRgV0jop 5I4Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnURxKfdnX+VXSX3r4/mQjmR6UkbRl7ZC5/upjhOiFpVq4HvdIqIK6KI5fYygFDiH3xKjE73JVT7UDqn8uxpq+cWHXU5m+P7FY7royFr4havpf50JM= MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.18.136 with SMTP id 8mr81321729qgf.64.1451928219732; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 09:23:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.22.49 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 09:23:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <6890009881797392186@unknownmsgid> References: <CAE_=YH-1XE2CEi5iZe=6K-EyjsTCSg+i+Cpowd4xP0Sc5zaHYw@mail.gmail.com> <6890009881797392186@unknownmsgid> Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 12:23:39 -0500 Message-ID: <CANvypvCPg6Lt45g-fXDXZooE=Tnd2outt2ktpyEtMn+2m2kQpA@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Fwd: Vanity Fair From: Sara Latham <slatham@hillaryclinton.com> To: John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11354642c6e6c5052885612a --001a11354642c6e6c5052885612a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Kristina Schake <kschake@hillaryclinton.com> Date: Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 12:15 PM Subject: Fwd: Vanity Fair To: Sara Latham <slatham@hillaryclinton.com> Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: *From:* Nick Merrill <nmerrill@hillaryclinton.com> *Date:* January 4, 2016 at 12:12:26 PM EST *To:* Christina Reynolds <creynolds@hillaryclinton.com>, Brian Fallon < bfallon@hillaryclinton.com>, Jennifer Palmieri < jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com>, Kristina Schake <kschake@hillaryclinton.com>, Tony Carrk <tcarrk@hillaryclinton.com>, Adrienne Elrod < aelrod@hillaryclinton.com> *Subject:* *Vanity Fair* They are now going to put the Huma piece on the website on Wednesday morning, and it will hit newsstands on the 12th. I think we should do a call about this and figure out how we're going to rally the troops to defend whatever nonsense is in there. We will need to engage CtR and Media Matters as well. If the primary focus of the piece is the Muslim Brotherhood nonsense, then we can more easily line up women MoC's to go after VF and defend Huma pretty aggressively I'd imagine. If the Teneo/SGE stuff has anything new or noteworthy in it, that will make life a little more difficult, and will require a little more hand to hand combat with press. Is some combination of this group available today or tonight for a call? It would be good to get digging in the meantime on anything we can find. Tony I can call you to elaborate. --001a11354642c6e6c5052885612a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">---------- Forwarded messag= e ----------<br>From: <b class=3D"gmail_sendername">Kristina Schake</b> <sp= an dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:kschake@hillaryclinton.com">kschake@hi= llaryclinton.com</a>></span><br>Date: Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 12:15 PM<br>Su= bject: Fwd: Vanity Fair<br>To: Sara Latham <<a href=3D"mailto:slatham@hi= llaryclinton.com">slatham@hillaryclinton.com</a>><br><br><div dir=3D"aut= o"><div>Sent from my iPhone</div><div><br>Begin forwarded message:<br><br><= /div><blockquote type=3D"cite"><div><b>From:</b> Nick Merrill <<a href= =3D"mailto:nmerrill@hillaryclinton.com" target=3D"_blank">nmerrill@hillaryc= linton.com</a>><br><b>Date:</b> January 4, 2016 at 12:12:26 PM EST<br><b= >To:</b> Christina Reynolds <<a href=3D"mailto:creynolds@hillaryclinton.= com" target=3D"_blank">creynolds@hillaryclinton.com</a>>, Brian Fallon &= lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bfallon@hillaryclinton.com" target=3D"_blank">bfallon@= hillaryclinton.com</a>>,=C2=A0 Jennifer Palmieri <<a href=3D"mailto:j= palmieri@hillaryclinton.com" target=3D"_blank">jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com= </a>>, Kristina Schake <<a href=3D"mailto:kschake@hillaryclinton.com"= target=3D"_blank">kschake@hillaryclinton.com</a>>,=C2=A0 Tony Carrk <= ;<a href=3D"mailto:tcarrk@hillaryclinton.com" target=3D"_blank">tcarrk@hill= aryclinton.com</a>>, Adrienne Elrod <<a href=3D"mailto:aelrod@hillary= clinton.com" target=3D"_blank">aelrod@hillaryclinton.com</a>><br><b>Subj= ect:</b> <b>Vanity Fair</b><br><br></div></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"c= ite"><div><div dir=3D"ltr">They are now going to put the Huma piece on the = website on Wednesday morning, and it will hit newsstands on the 12th.<div><= br></div><div>I think we should do a call about this and figure out how we&= #39;re going to rally the troops to defend whatever nonsense is in there.= =C2=A0 We will need to engage CtR and Media Matters as well.=C2=A0 If the p= rimary focus of the piece is the Muslim Brotherhood nonsense, then we can m= ore easily line up women MoC's to go after VF and defend Huma pretty ag= gressively I'd imagine.=C2=A0 If the Teneo/SGE stuff has anything new o= r noteworthy in it, that will make life a little more difficult, and will r= equire a little more hand to hand combat with press.</div><div><br></div><d= iv>Is some combination of this group available today or tonight for a call?= =C2=A0</div><div><br></div><div>It would be good to get digging in the mea= ntime on anything we can find.=C2=A0 Tony I can call you to elaborate.</div= ><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div> </div></blockquote></div> </div><br></div> --001a11354642c6e6c5052885612a--