It’s Thanksgiving, which means that you have better things to do than worry about seemingly arcane rules repealed by the FCC, and that’s exactly why the net neutrality repeal was announced this week. Net neutrality is a phrase that seems designed to put people to sleep, but the premise is very simple: right now, the internet runs at roughly the same speed regardless of which website you go to. Without net neutrality, internet service providers like Comcast can effectively control what websites you can visit by manipulating the speed of the connection. Portugal does not have net neutrality, and they provide a window into what this dystopian future looks like.

In Portugal, with no net neutrality, internet providers are starting to split the net into packages. pic.twitter.com/TlLYGezmv6 — Ro Khanna (@RoKhanna) October 27, 2017

Without net neutrality, Comcast would be able to control what you can see based on what you're willing to pay them. Under the new order ushered in by the FCC next month, the Comcast's of the world may have unilateral power over the most democratic force in the history of mankind. The argument in favor of getting rid of net neutrality is basically trickle-down economics—a philosophy that the Republican Party religiously adheres to, where they believe that all we need to do is funnel all of our cash to the very top of the economic ladder, and somehow, our own money will trickle back down to us plebeians. They've been trying this since the 1980s, and inequality has only gotten worse during that time. There is no modern theory that has been more thoroughly debunked by reality than supply-side economics.

Then, the thinking goes, self-reporting and transparency and market competition will prevent ISPs from cheating or unfairly blocking traffic or throttling the competition because consumers don't want that, as they have clearly stated many times. — Molly Wood (@mollywood) November 22, 2017

So whether you buy the argument for scrapping the rules depends on whether you believe that companies are fundamentally trustworthy and/or governed effectively by competition. — Molly Wood (@mollywood) November 22, 2017

If you believe that Comcast and Time Warner are fundamentally trustworthy, then you either are a sad person or have never paid for cable or internet in your life. There is little competition with ISP's, as these massive conglomerates have effectively divided the country up and granted each other monopolies, while leaving table scraps for the smaller ISP's to fight over. Repealing net neutrality is essentially like letting the fox into the henhouse and hoping they won't do what they're designed to do. Big business in America is inherently predatory, and what is happening in Portugal is a glimpse into our totalitarian future.

Stop me if you've heard this before, but the root of this problem is that Congress won't do their job. The internet is classified as a utility like phone lines, even though it clearly is in a category all by itself. Everyone acknowledges that this is and always has been a clunky solution to a complex problem, but Congress refuses to do anything on this front, so the job falls to the executive branch. The FCC is a partisan body run by a 3 to 2 majority in favor of whomever is president. Because we have a pure kleptocrat in office now, Trump is using the FCC to sell the internet to the highest bidder. The big ISP's have been clamoring to repeal net neutrality for quite some time, and all it took was a president uninterested in democracy to enable their worst instincts.

This is likely happening, and it will fundamentally change the nature of the internet forever. You will find some of your favorite websites effectively blocked by slow connections. You will have to pay more to use services you already have ingrained into your life like Facebook and Netflix. Proponents of repealing net neutrality argue that doing this would create more competition in the market, but that's a naïve reading of how the market works. There are plenty of smaller internet service providers who this repeal is theoretically supposed to help, but the market has consolidated to the point where it's difficult to not envision giants like Comcast throwing their weight around, given how many markets where they are the only option for people to connect to the internet.

Also, I've been covering this since 2005 and there are only a small handful of examples of ISPs engaging in non-neutral activity. Comcast's was worst—throttling Bittorrent traffic to stop illegal downloading (and dragnetting legal files in the process). https://t.co/B6d999YUEW — Molly Wood (@mollywood) November 22, 2017

But there hasn't actually been large-scale, regular cheating by ISPs, like we kind of all thought there would be as Internet providers moved more and more into content. HOWEVER … there's been a lot more consolidation of Internet providers and content providers since then. — Molly Wood (@mollywood) November 22, 2017

Additionally, hundreds of thousands of impersonators have flocked to the FCC's comment page on net neutrality, and they have provided no information to New York's Attorney General who is investigating this.

We reached out for assistance to multiple top FCC officials, including @AjitPaiFCC, three successive acting FCC General Counsels, and the FCC's Inspector General.



Yet we have received no substantive response to our investigative requests. — Eric Schneiderman (@AGSchneiderman) November 22, 2017

In an era where foreign govs have indisputably tried to use the internet to influence our elections, federal and state govt should be working together to ensure that no one can subvert our administrative agencies' decision-making processes. — Eric Schneiderman (@AGSchneiderman) November 22, 2017

Bottom-line: there are few instances of non-neutral activity by internet service providers under net neutrality, and looking at countries like Portugal is a window into our future. If you believe that the most democratizing force in the history of mankind should remain free from being sold to you in pieces, then call your Congressman to demand that they do their job and introduce legislation prior to net neutrality being rolled back in mid-December, so we can actually have a debate about this. This repeal will fundamentally change the internet forever, but don't take my word for it—listen to a widely respected, and wildly successful internet entrepreneur.

And Pai's history on this is clear — long before "fake news" became the tactic for undermining trust & accuracy in the public sphere, he was undermining researchers who were trying to prevent the spread of fake news: https://t.co/7fNWJoecB6 — Anil Dash (@anildash) November 21, 2017

It may already be too late to save #NetNeutrality, but we've got to try. Call your congressperson, using the script here: https://t.co/5M3uBCSUl7 And tell them to push the FCC commissioners to vote to save Net Neutrality on December 14. — Anil Dash (@anildash) November 21, 2017

This is wise advice from someone who knows. #SaveNetNeutralityhttps://t.co/P2EkkNnnEy — Anil Dash (@anildash) November 22, 2017

Jacob Weindling is a staff writer for Paste politics. Follow him on Twitter at @Jakeweindling.