Following Hindi translation is by Pandit Ram Govind Trivedi





A few Hindus says that these verses from Vedas are symbolic. I am not discussing whether these verses are figurative or not in spite of the fact that Panchavimsha and Aitareya Brahmana (said above which are critiques of these verses) doesn't clarify it symbolically, But I am worried about the foulness advanced in Vedas. Was Ishwar shy of words that he utilized such profane words in Vedas? Why wouldn't he be able to utilize some pleasant verse in the event that he needs to pass on a message? There is most likely these verses advance inbreeding amongst father and little girl, If Hindus don't concur then they ought to outfit reference from Vedas wherein Ishwar denies interbreeding amongst father and little girl. Another variant demonstrates that Brahma separated himself into two sections a male and a female and animals were conceived from these two after their union,





Shiva Purana, Vayaviyasamhita 7, Section I, part 17.1-4 "Securing the considerable and unceasing Sakti from the master and fancying to start the procedure of reproduction by sexual intercourse, Brahma turn into a wondrous man in one half and a lady in one half. From the lady half was conceived Satarupa. The man half made Viraja, called Svayambhuva Manu, the main creation. Playing out a troublesome compensation the tender Satarupa got the Manu of brilliant notoriety as her better half." Tr. J.L. Shastri





Brahmanda Purana 1.2.9.32-38a "Brahma disposed of his own sparkling physical body. In the wake of separating his own particular body into two, he turned into a man by on half. By (another) half he turned into a lady and she was Satarupa. She was the Prakrti, the mother of every single living being (and showed along these lines) in light of the fact that the master was making out of yearning. ..The a large portion of that was made as a lady progressed toward becoming Satarupa. That heavenly woman played out an exceptionally troublesome retribution for a hundred thousand years and got Purusa of splendid popularity as her better half. Without a doubt, he is called Manu, the Purusa, the prior child of the self-conceived master… After getting as his significant other, Satarupa who was not conceived of any womb, the Purusa brandished with her. Thus it is called Rati (sexual dalliance)." Tr. G.V. Tagare





A few stories likewise says that it was Brahma's child and little girl who had forbidden relationship for spread,





Devi Bhagavatam 3.13.15-16 "Next Svayambhava Manu sprang from the lower half of Brahma; and the girl named Satarupa left the left hand side of the Brahma's body. The two children Priyavrata and Uttânapâda were conceived of Manu in the womb of S'atarûpâ and the three little girls, exceptionally wonderful and reasonable complexioned, were additionally conceived of him." Tr. Swami Vijnananda





Srimad Bhagvatam 4.1.1 Sri Maitreya stated: Svayambhuva Manu generated three girls in his significant other Satarupa, and their names were Akuti, Devahuti and Prasuti.





Swami Prabhupada composes on this verse: "… The Supreme Lord Himself does the genuine creation by disturbing His material vitality, and afterward, by His request, Brahma, the principal living animal in the universe, endeavors to make the diverse planetary frameworks and their occupants, growing the populace through his offspring, as Manu and different begetters of living substances, who work unendingly under the request of the Supreme Lord… Svayambhuva Manu was the child of Brahma. Brahma had numerous different children, yet Manu's name is particularly specified first since he was an incredible lover of the Lord. In this verse there is likewise the word ca, showing that other than the three little girls specified, Svayambhuva Manu additionally had two children." http://vanisource.org/wiki/SB_4.1.1





Swami Prabhupada





on Srimad Bhagavatam 3.12.48 "… His supernatural esteem is not to be limited, despite the fact that he displayed a propensity to make the most of his own little girl. There is a reason for the show of such an inclination by Brahmā, and he is not to be denounced like a normal living substance." http://vanisource.org/wiki/SB_3.12.48





An adaptation of Kausitaki demonstrates that Brahma's children were pulled in to their sister and Kausitaki Brahamana additionally finds no issue in this demonstration,





Kausitaki Brahmana 6.1.1-12 "Prajapati, being covetous of spread, experienced atonement; from him when warmed were conceived five, Agni, Vayu, Adityaa, Candramas, and Usas as fifth. He said to them, 'Do ye likewise hone intensity.' They blessed themselves; at that point when they had sanctified themselves and had procured enthusiasm, Usas, posterity of Prajapati, appearing as an Apsaras, turned out before them; to her their brains slanted; they spilled out seed; they went to Prajapati, their dad, and stated, 'We have spilled out seed; let it not stay here'. Prajapati made a brilliant bowl, a bolt broadness in tallness and comparable in expansiveness; in it he poured the seed; at that point emerged he of a thousand eyes, of a thousand feet, with a thousand fitted (bolts)." Tr. A.B. Keith





Different renditions demonstrates that Brahma was rebuffed for having an unsanctioned romance with his own girl,





Satapatha Brahmana 1.7.4.1-3 Prajapati set his brain all alone girl, either Sky or Dawn. 'May I combine with her,' [he wished. He had intercourse to her. That to be sure was a wrongdoing for the divine beings: 'He who acts along these lines towards his own little girl, our sister, [commits a sin].' Those divine beings at that point said to this god who is ruler of cows. 'A demonstration of transgression he confers who acts in this manner towards his own particular little girl, our sister. Puncture him.' Rudra, having pointed [him], penetrated him. In the center [of the demonstration, his semen spurted forward. In this way surely it was.





Matryani Samhita (4.214 [35, 11-15]) Prajapati wanted his own particular little girl Usas, she turned into a red deer, [and he,] having expected a buck, went on top of her. Prajapati set his brain on Usas, his own particular girl. She, having turned into a deer, stopped for him. He, having turned into a buc, bounced on her. he (rudra-agni) reflected: "For this have the divine beings delivered me, for supervision. This one (Prajapati) transgesses. Give me a chance to puncture him." He penetrated him. Pierced, he diverted from this [buck] appearance and rose upwards.





Aitareya Brahmana 3.33.1-4 The divine beings saw him (Prajapati). 'Prajapati does what is not done.' They looked for one who might hit him. They couldn't discover this [god] among each other. Their most unpleasant structures they assembled into one. United, those [forms] moved toward becoming (abhavat) this god. Along these lines there is this name of his (i.e., Bhutapati) that contains [the word] Bhuta. He flourishes in the event that he accordingly knows this name of his. To him the divine beings stated: "Prajapti here has done what is not done. Puncture him." 'So be it.' He said. "Give me a chance to pick a shelter from you." "Pick," [They said]. He picked this extremely aid: overlordship of cows (Pasu}. Consequently there is this name of his (Pasupati) that contains [the word] Pasu. As a proprietor of dairy cattle he flourishes, in the event that he accordingly knows this name of his.





Skanda Purana III.i.40.6-12 "Prajpati (i.e. Brahma) was in the past beguiled, O Brahmanas. He sought like his very own mate girl named Vac (Speech) euphorically. This little girl of Prajapati wound up noticeably embarrassed on seeing his lascivious love for her. Subsequently she accepted the type of a Rohita deer. Slanted to have sexual dalliance with her, Brahma too appeared as a deer. As she proceeded in the appearance of a female deer, he too took after her. On observing him plan on having sex with his girl, every one of the gods censured him: 'This Brahma is conferring a deed that ought not be done, i.e. (endeavor to have) sexual union with one's own particular girl.' Thus they reprimanded the maker and the Lord of the universes. On observing Paramesthin (Brahma) occupied with the prohibited demonstration, Lord Hara took up the Pinaka bow and expected the type of a seeker. He fitted one bolt to his bow. He drew the bow string similar to his ear and hit Brahma with his sharp bolt. Struck around the bolt of the Annihilator of the three Puras, Brahma tumbled down on the ground." Tr. G.V. Tagare

According to Hindu writings, Brahma had depraved association with his own particular girl Saraswati. Such a demonstration was finished by the maker Brahma. There are distinctive adaptations of this story. Saraswati is Brahma's associate and it's specified in Puranas, according to Skanda Purana III.i.41.98-99 Brahma had two spouses Gayatri and Saraswati. As I said before, there are a few forms to this story. Some content says that Brahma was hitched to Saraswati and some say he had perverted relationship without marriage. Some say Brahma lived together with Saraswati for the proliferation in the wake of wedding her and some say he lived together with her for spread without marriage, verses which discusses Brahma's association with Saraswati for engendering doesn't see the relationship as evil. Some content says that Brahma and Saraswati were welcomed and invited after their marriage and some content says that Brahma was rebuffed for taking part in an extramarital entanglements with his own particular girl. I have taken a few references from Catherine Ludvik's book. Following verse demonstrates Brahma's marriage with Saraswati and how they were invited in Brahma-loka,Brahma Vaivarta Purana, Krishna Janma Khanda 35.8-20 "… Then he came and bowed to me; and having secured Saraswati, the conjurer of the three universes, as his lady of the hour Brahma faltered with her in a few places in isolation. After a decent arrangement of redirection, he halted from his loves and returned to Brahma-loka… Then they performed favorable customs, welcomed Brahman and the goddess Bharati, happily introduced in into the place that is known for Brahma. Brahma worn with her day and night and was caught up in sexual delights… " Tr. Rajendra Nath SenBrahmanas talks about this unlawful relationship,Pancavimsa Brahmana 8.2.10 Prajapati went on top of his own little girl Usas. His semen took off. It was poured on this (the earth). He made it consummate, [thinking]: "Let this [Semen] of mine not be ruined." He made it [something] genuine, to be specific, cows.Aitareya Brahmana 6.5.27 For the semen resembles something unspeakable furtively emptied forward into the womb. The sperm winds up noticeably mixed. For when Prajapati had bodily intercourse with his little girl, his sperm was poured forward upon the earth (and was stirred up with it. This was accomplished for making the sperm deliver organic product.Matsya Purana 3.43-44 "Brahma, let go with energy in her organization, wedded Satarupa and started to pass his days in delight inside a lotus. He delighted in the organization of Savitri for a long time, and after quite a while Manu was destined to them." Tr. Taluqdar of Oudh, altered by B.D. BasuThe part 4 of Matsya Purana legitimizes this demonstration of Brahma saying that Devas bring forth descendants in very extraordinary ways.The other form of this story is that, Brahma had forbidden association with his little girl keeping in mind the end goal to make living creatures,Birhadaranyaka Upanishad 1.4.3 "He was not in any way glad. Along these lines individuals (still) are not glad when alone. He sought a mate. He progressed toward becoming as large as man and spouse grasping each other. He separated this very body into two. From that came a couple. Hence, said Yajnavalkya, this (body) is one-portion of oneself, similar to one of the two parts of a split pea. In this way this space is for sure filled by the spouse. He was joined with her. From that men were conceived." Tr. Swami MadhavanandaAdiShankaracharya composes on this verse,"He, the Viraj called Manu, was joined with her, his little girl called Satarupa, whom he thought about as his better half. From that union men were conceived." Adi Shankaracharya on Brihadaranyaka Upanishad 1.4.3, Tr. Swami Madhavananda.The following verse 1.4.4 says she fled and ended up plainly unique creatures and Prajapati expected the male types of those creatures and had intercourse (perused assault) with her thus all such animals were conceived, So this demonstrates creation occurred after Prajapati assaulted his little girl. Creation after father engaging in sexual relations with girl is additionally bolstered by the Vedas,Apparatus Veda 10.61.5-7 (Rudra), the supporter of man, whose anxious virile vitality was created, stepped it back when dispersed (for the era of offspring)again the overpowering (Rudra) thinks (the vitality) which was imparted to his lady little girl. At the point when the deed was done in mid-paradise in the nearness of the father working his will, and the little girl meeting up, they let the seed fall marginally; it was poured upon the high place of relinquish. At the point when the father joined with the little girl, at that point partner with the earth, he sprinkled it with the effusion[Semen]: at that point the insightful divine beings generated Brahma : they created the ruler of the hearth (of yield) ; the shield of hallowed ceremonies.