Gov. John Kasich's so-called 'common sense gun reform' is now officially before state lawmakers.

House Republican Michael Henne has introduced House Bill 585, which takes up the governor's six proposed points of reform from a bipartisan working group. It includes keeping guns out of the hands of domestic violence offenders and giving a judge the power to order potentially dangerous people to give up their guns temporarily.

While some gun supporters said there's little impact even if it passes, others like Matt Monteville hope it makes their children safer.

Monteville is a father of four and in the education field himself.

"Student safety is something we think about all the time," he said.

That’s why he likes what he's heard about HB 585 which includes banning armor piercing ammunition, banning bump stocks and closing loopholes in the background check system.

"These proposals sound very reasonable,” Monteville said. “I'm not looking to take away people's rights to hunt and protect themselves, I think that's important. But I also think common sense needs to carry the day."

It echoes some of what we heard from Ohio's Republican governor when we sat down with him on March 16.

"I'm a Second Amendment guy, but I'm not going to support a Second Amendment that I think is dangerous," he said.

At the time, he admitted he had undergone a change in heart after recent shootings.

"With Las Vegas and Florida, of course, it changes us all," Kasich said.

But Todd Gillispie, owner of Todd's Sporting Goods in Proctorville, said other aspects of the bill, like keeping guns from domestic violence offenders or prohibiting third party gun sales are already banned at a federal level.

"That's the first question they ask you," he said. "The common sense part of it is already in effect. If they would just enforce the laws that are already there, that'd be fine."

But Henne tells us this bill would allow local police and deputies to enforce the law, not just federal authorities.

Gillispie disagrees most with the so-called red flag part of the bill, allowing a judge power to take away guns from a dangerous person.

He most worries about what's next.

"If you give an inch, they'll take a mile," Gillispie said.

Gillispie and Monteville disagree on whether Kasich's plan can pass.

"I think he's grasping to do something,” Gillispie said. “I don't think it will come about."

"I would hope so,” Monteville said. “Though it today’s political climate I’m not sure.”

Henne tells us the red flag or extreme risk protection order would work on a potentially dangerous person through a multistep process.

First, a family member or police officer would go to a judge. Second, the subject would have to be served with a court date, either in person or registered mail. Third, the judge must determine there's "clear and convincing" evidence to take guns away from that man or woman and specify a time frame.