I did my own survey over the last two weeks and asked 150 of my colleagues (mostly professionals with university degrees in their 40s) if they would put more faith and trust in the New York Times or TheIntercept.com and I was shocked by how badly they trashed the venerable Times. 78% said they think the Intercept is more credible because it doesn't censor and will not cave to government "requests". (Only 103 of my emails received cooperative answers).One girl in my office even said "With the exception of Seymour Hersh, the New York Times has lost their spine".23 others specifically pointed out that while the New York Daily News and The New York Post both ignored the media blackout and published the Saudi links to 911 ( http://www.opnlttr.com/letter/media-...-15-year-cover ) The New York Times did not cover the story at all.Another guy in our branch office asked "We need a NY Times editor to leak what thehas happened to the Times, it has turned into a lap dog of the government in recent years/"Anyway, I spent 2 hours looking at the Intercept stories, and I hope they decide to become the next USA today because we really need a source of accurate and unbiased news that is not fabricated or slanted to serve the agenda of the elite..I would pay 5 bucks a day to get true and accurate news. Since Murdoch bought the WSJ, there is no really reliable source and the Intercept fills the truth vacuum quite well.With only 6 companies now controlling the information flow in the West, we will soon end up like China where the government regulates and approves all the news people are "allowed" to know.