Quoted By:

It's pretty simple, OP.If most people are poor, but you are extremely rich, then in some sense you are more free than you could be if everyone was well off.Purchasing a hit on your enemy for $10k is to Soros what misplacing a penny is to you.Filling a private island with underaged prostitutes is like taking the family out to McDonalds.Once you see this sort of thing, it makes sense. Would Soros be better off working for the benefit of mankind as a whole? Only if his desires are compatible with the average person. Otherwise, he needs them impoverished and therefore turned into commodities.There is a less deep, but also poignant thing going on as well. Most of the rich people in the world today really didn't build anything. We have financial oligarchs that got rich on usury, who were able to practice this usury not because they were the best competitors in a free market but because they were willing to do the dirty work of their regime in return for the privileged economic advantages. For example, Soros working for the Nazis as a youth. This describes the whole lot more or less, just slightly changing the names/details.