The Anthrax letters came from inside the United States.

The letters contained a specific type of weaponized Anthrax made by a United States military lab which had been claiming for a lot of years that it wasn't doing that sort of thing any more. "What? Oh, you mean THAT Anthrax over there! Sheesh, we thought you said 'Pamflax' and shuckies but we quit making that stuff a long time ago. Honest. Really. If we're lying may God strike us... a glancing blow."

(Ahem)

The pattern of the mailings of the Anthrax letters was also suspicious. Congress got their Anthrax letters just in time for the vote on the disingenuously named USA Patriot Act (aka the anti-terror bill) which the terrorized Senators voted into law without bothering to read. The bill was signed on Oct. 26, 2001, and it opened the door for a wide array of civil rights and liberties violations. How convenient for the bill's sponsors that there was a terror attack on the Congress just when Congress was about to vote on the anti-terror bill. Eerie timing, isn't it?

So now, knowing that the Anthrax letters came from an American source, take another look at the actual letters.

Click letters for full sized image

There are several indications of deliberate deception in these items.

A terrorist group who hates every American would not advertise the fact that the letters contained a biological weapon, they would have enclosed an innocuous letter to ensure maximum spread of the agent. Look at the letters, they are virtually shouting "seal off the area and see a doctor now!"

The addresses are written at a slight slant, oddly enough matching the look of the posters and flyers at the Post Office warning all America to "watch out for these". Dates written by Middle Easterners begin with the day first, then the month, then the year - the date should have read 11-9-01. The above letters follow the American convention for dates.

One of the letters is a photocopy of another. Most places which have copiers have typewriters or word processors, appliances whose operation is no mystery to the sort of people who go in and out of government laboratories.

In short, the entire look of the letters is a contrived fake, creating what they thought a letter from Arabs would look like, so that the phrases "Death to Israel", and "Allah is Great" (a real Muslim says either "Allah Achbar" or "God is Great") would point the finger of blame for the Anthrax at Arabs.

Except that we know for a fact that the Anthrax didn't come from the Middle East. It isn't Saddam's or Osama's, it's the very best high quality mil-spec Anthrax home grown at Fort Detrick, Dugway, and USAMRIID.

It's our Anthrax.

And that means that all the slanted writing, the extra crossings on the "T"s, the references to Allah and Israel are a carefully crafted hoax, designed to trick Americans into thinking that Arab Muslims were to blame for the Anthrax letters.

There are two suspects accused of being the source of the Anthrax letters. The first is Dr. Philip Zack, who was caught on camera entering the storage area where the Anthrax was kept without proper authorization after being fired from his job for a racially motivated attack on an Egyptian coworker. The second suspect is the more well known Dr. Stephen Hatfill, accused (and re-accused and re-accused) by Dr. Barbara Rosenberg although no actual evidence of his involvement has surfaced.

Regardless of whether one thinks Dr. Zack or Dr. Hill is the culprit, neither man is an Arab Muslim, which means that the above letters are not evidence of a terrorist attack. They are evidence of an intentional deception against the people of the United States; a deliberate frame-up of middle eastern Arabs for acts of terror committed inside the United States.

ARABS ARE BEING FRAMED FOR TERROR ATTACKS IN THE UNITED STATES!

Does that plot extend to 9-11 itself.

Just ten days after the events of 9-11, the FBI admitted that the IDs used by the perpetrators were high-quality fakes using identities stolen from Arab men. FBI Director Robert Mueller has admitted in public that there is actually no evidence that proves the named 9-11 hijackers were actually on the aircraft. Mueller admitted on CNN on September 20 and 27 that the FBI had no proof of the identities of the men actually on board the airplanes.

In an April 19 speech delivered to the Common wealth Club in San Francisco, Mueller said that the purported hijackers, in his words, left no paper trial. The FBI director stated flatly, "In our investigation, we have not uncovered a single piece of papereither here in the United States or in the treasure trove of information that has turned up in Afghanistan and elsewherethat mentioned any aspect of the Sept. 11 plot." In describing Muellers evidence fiasco, Los Angeles Times reporters Erich Lichtblau and Josh Meyer, whose article was reprinted in The Washington Post on April 30, note that: Law enforcement officials say that while they have been able to reconstruct the movements of the hijackers before the attacksall legal except for a few speeding ticketsthey have found no evidence of their actual plotting.

Now think about that for a moment. What Mueller admitted is that despite all the immediate pronouncements of these Arab names and assertions that they all worked for Osama bin Laden, the FBI with all its investigatory powers did not find one single piece of evidence that actually connected these Arab men to the events of 9-11. All the FBI had were fake IDs found in suitcases left conspicuously where they could be found.

Many of the investigators believe that some of the initial clues that were uncovered about the terrorists' identities and preparations, such as flight manuals, were meant to be found. A former high-level intelligence official told me, "Whatever trail was left was left deliberately--for the F.B.I. to chase." The New Yorker - What Went Wrong by Seymour Hersh - 10/1/01

But the story gets better! AT LEAST 7 OF THE 9-11 HIJACKERS ARE STILL ALIVE!

Saudi Arabia asked for AND GOT, an official apology from the United States government for naming Abdul Rahman Said al-Omari as one of the hijackers. The United States barely evaded a lawsuit from Saudi Airlines for accusing one of its pilots of being a 9-11 hijacker.

The two faces of Flight 93 'hijacker' Ziad Jarrah

Click for full sized image. In lining up the one eye and the mouth it is obvious that the man in the Visa has a rounder skull, a more pronounced cheek bone, and the eyebrows are different. There are a lot of other minor differences. The two men look alike, no question, but they are not the same man.

The stark reality is that Arab men were named as the suspects for 9-11 on the basis of IDs admitted by the FBI to be fake. Aside from evidence which senior intelligence officials admit appears to have been planted, the FBI was unable to find any evidence at all that the named suspects had anything to do with 9-11.

None of the alleged Arab hijacker's names appear on any of the aircraft passenger lists:

The official autopsy results from Flight 77 failed to identify any remains from any Arabs at all!

Click above documents for full sized images.

Do you GET IT yet?

Whoever committed 9-11 intended to blame Arabs for it.

9-11 WAS A FRAME-UP. Based on the evidence, we do not know who was on those planes. We do know that whoever was behind 9-11 went to a great deal of trouble to plant evidence to point the finger of blame at Arabs. We therefore only really know who we were supposed to blame. And given that most of the stolen identities were those of Saudis, it is clear that suspicion for 9-11 was intended to be planted mostly on Saudi Arabia, with the purpose of at least sabotaging US/Saudi relations, and at worst, triggering an outright attack by the US on Saudi Arabia.

Somewhere there is a nation that is very jealous of the US/Saudi relations. Somewhere there is a nation that, like a spoiled child who tolerates no siblings to intrude on the relationship to the spoiling parent, tries to sabotage all those who might intrude on their special relationship with the United States. Somewhere there is a nation that cannot compete with the influence that nearly a trillion dollars in investment capital buys in the United States, and resorts to dirty tricks to undermine that influence.

Whoever was behind 9-11 failed in their first attempt to frame Saudi Arabia for 9-11. Are they trying again? And if so, who is helping them?