Does being a Guardian of Truth involve trying to intimidate actual journalists for doing their jobs? HuffPost’s Yashar Ali got his answer yesterday.

This thread below from Yashar Ali is really something… https://t.co/D3v9CEUXaC — Joe Concha (@JoeConchaTV) March 29, 2019

You really need to read this whole thread. https://t.co/cjrCST5L8I — Cam Edwards (@CamEdwards) March 29, 2019

You really do:

1. Yesterday, I received a call from @DafnaLinzer who serves as managing editor of NBC/MSNBC politics. Dafna's conduct during the call was highly inappropriate and unethical. So what was the purpose of her call? She called me to bully me on behalf of the DNC. — Yashar Ali ? (@yashar) March 29, 2019

2. Dafna, who oversees the political coverage for NBC and MSNBC, was calling to bully me into delaying the publication of an innocuous scoop and at no point did she advocate for her network, it was only about the DNC. Here's how this all started… — Yashar Ali ? (@yashar) March 29, 2019

3. Yesterday morning I received a tip from a trusted source. The source told me the DNC would be announcing the dates of the first 2020 primary debates later that day. The source gave me the dates they would be announcing: June 26 and 27. — Yashar Ali ? (@yashar) March 29, 2019

4. At first I thought it was just a fun tidbit that I could tweet out. But after I called several presidential campaign staffers I learn that all the Dem campaigns were desperate to learn what the dates were going to be. I decided to post the scoop as an item in my newsletter. — Yashar Ali ? (@yashar) March 29, 2019

5. This wasn't a huge scoop but it was a decent one so I quickly called the DNC to fact-check the tip as I was running out of time: the dates would be announced on MSNBC in the 4:00 PM hour. It's important to note that almost of all of my communication with the DNC was off record — Yashar Ali ? (@yashar) March 29, 2019

6. So I won't share most of what was said but can tell you it's pretty run-of-the mill stuff. I asked the DNC if my tip was accurate and they asked if they could call me back in 10 minutes. A few minutes later they called back and asked if I could delay posting my scoop — Yashar Ali ? (@yashar) March 29, 2019

7. For another hour so they could go through their important notification calls to the state parties. I told them I couldn't wait as the news would leak and leave me without a story. That's all I can say about the call. Two minutes later I received a call from Dafna. — Yashar Ali ? (@yashar) March 29, 2019

8. I've never spoken to Dafna by phone. A couple years ago she reached out to me to see if I wanted to have coffee and talk about working at NBC News but I declined as I was actively investigating NBC matters and thought it would be strange if I discussed a job. — Yashar Ali ? (@yashar) March 29, 2019

9. So when I saw Dafna calling I assumed she would ask me to consider delaying my post so that MSNBC could announce it first. Given that this was an innocuous scoop and not some investigative story I wouldn't have lost sleep if I had delayed. But that's not why she was calling. — Yashar Ali ? (@yashar) March 29, 2019

10. After exchanging pleasantries, Dafna told me that she received a call from the DNC and was told I had a story. Now it's not strange that the DNC called her, they were coordinating an announcement. What was strange was that she was calling me and taking a menacing tone — Yashar Ali ? (@yashar) March 29, 2019

11. She asked if I could hold the story and I said I couldn't. She was agitated, "why not?" I said I'm not going to lose a scoop. Then she got angrier and said "Why not? It's not a big deal, let them make a few phone calls." My jaw dropped. — Yashar Ali ? (@yashar) March 29, 2019

12. I realized that @DafnaLinzer, the head of all political coverage for NBC News and MSNBC wasn't calling to advocate for her network, she was calling to advocate the DNC's position. She wanted me to wait so they could call state party leaders. — Yashar Ali ? (@yashar) March 29, 2019

13. I thought to myself "this is how people think it works." It's not. But Dafna was doing it. She kept pressing me. Now I acknowledged, for stuff that isn't about serious investigative reporting, there is no problem holding something. But I knew once others got the call — Yashar Ali ? (@yashar) March 29, 2019

14. I would lose a scoop. Dafna reminded me she was a nat sec reporter at WAPO for ten years and they would hold stuff all the time (note: so people wouldn't get killed). "Why can't you just wait, let them make their calls, then you'll be the first to put it into print," she said — Yashar Ali ? (@yashar) March 29, 2019

15. I couldn't believe what she was saying. Again, it was fine for me to print the story an hour later, beat her own network by three hours, she just wanted me to let the DNC inform state party leaders. Why the hell did she care? — Yashar Ali ? (@yashar) March 29, 2019

16. I kept telling Dafna no, that I wasn't waiting. And she kept getting more frustrated. She was exasperated…she didn't understand why I couldn't wait for the DNC to make their state notification calls. — Yashar Ali ? (@yashar) March 29, 2019

17. I was so surprised me that she was talking this way with a total stranger. The head of the political division was trying to bully me at the behest of the DNC over a dumb scoop (even though they may not have asked her to) — Yashar Ali ? (@yashar) March 29, 2019

18. 2/3 of the way into the conversation Dafna started a sentence with "this is off the record." She hadn't said it at the beginning of our conversation and most important at no point did I agree when she said "off record" to keep it off record. — Yashar Ali ? (@yashar) March 29, 2019

19. I'm not one of those gotcha reporters, I think it's bad for sourcing relationships to make people like they constantly feel like they have to say "off record." But Dafna isn't a source and she was calling to intimidate me, so she doesn't get the benefit. — Yashar Ali ? (@yashar) March 29, 2019

20. She said "off record" one more time later in the call and again I just let her keep talking, I did not agree to anything. I then told her I had to go talk to my editor and she got even more frustrated and said "No. I want to talk to you about this." — Yashar Ali ? (@yashar) March 29, 2019

21. I said "no, I want to go talk to my editor." Then she sent me over the edge and said "What's your editors name, I want to talk to them." She was trying to intimidate me..on behalf of the DNC. I ended the call. — Yashar Ali ? (@yashar) March 29, 2019

22. After the call with Dafna I published the stupid scoop. Then I did a gut check and over the next two hours I called 10 experienced prominent reporters and told them the story. They were all stunned by what Dafna did and encouraged me to share it publicly. — Yashar Ali ? (@yashar) March 29, 2019

23. I'm not naive to the fact that this incident is going to be twisted by some with an agenda to discredit the media and say they collude with political parties. But I think its more important to expose bad behavior then keep it under wraps. What Dafna did was unethical — Yashar Ali ? (@yashar) March 29, 2019

24. There are plenty of times reporters will introduce people in politics to other reporters or TV people. I have done it many times, that is advocating for more coverage, not less. Dafna was advocating for me to not do something on behalf of a political party. — Yashar Ali ? (@yashar) March 29, 2019

25. What I can't figure out is (and no one else I spoke to could understand), why open yourself up to this for a stupid story? How was this worth it? END — Yashar Ali ? (@yashar) March 29, 2019

Because Dafna Linzer knows where her bread is buttered.

Didn't really need confirmation that NBC / MSNBC considers itself an arm of the DNC but here is the confirmation anyway. https://t.co/lgv4RlAwfg — RBe (@RBPundit) March 29, 2019

I'm sure Chuck Todd will blame this on Fox News. https://t.co/VNFLuV0lkx — BT (@back_ttys) March 29, 2019

Don’t be surprised. Anything to take the spotlight off of his own networks.

This thread is a must read. News organizations – in this instance NBC/MSNBC – are not supposed to do this… https://t.co/8hnLmk9lJ9 — Ari Fleischer (@AriFleischer) March 29, 2019

This thread is remarkable. What we have here is the managing editor of NBC politics acting on behalf the Democratic National Committee. This goes well beyond the liberal bias we’ve come to expect. https://t.co/4Kkr0xXpC8 — Brit Hume (@brithume) March 29, 2019

This is…incredible. It is absolutely inappropriate and unethical. And…once again…in no uncertain terms…show the INHERENT BIAS among the mainstream press. https://t.co/CqgbfVzH7o — Pradheep J. Shanker, M.D., M.S. (@Neoavatara) March 29, 2019

Parting food for thought:

You have to know that this isn't the first time this Dafna lady has used her position in media to try to help Democrats, right? https://t.co/lgv4RlAwfg — RBe (@RBPundit) March 29, 2019

If @DafnaLinzer is willing to bully @Yashar for the DNC over something as meaningless as debate dates, imagine what she does for the DNC on stuff that matters… https://t.co/dtjOEUJ0kP — Steve Robinson (@BigSteve207) March 29, 2019

Editor’s note: This post has been updated with additional tweets.

***

Update:

NBC PR just got back to me… they and Linzer have no comment on this: https://t.co/sWrfqBUlQT — Brian Stelter (@brianstelter) March 29, 2019

“No comment,” huh? Weird. Dafna Linzer apparently had plenty to say before!

It’s pretty bad when PR has no comment — Dorit Murciano (@doritnyc) March 29, 2019

Maybe they’re waiting for the DNC to send them talking points. — Paul M Winters (@RealPaulWinters) March 29, 2019

Ah. That’s probably it.