You are not logged in. Login or Signup

no real reason

archived) ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:33,

Sooo true!

archived) ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:34,

abuahi abuahi abuahi abuahi

( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 13:50, archived) ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 13:50,

Haha

woo ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:35, archived) ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:35,

Hahaha

( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:35, archived) ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:35,

Nom

I want that onion ring snack on his head. ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:35, archived) ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:35,

if onion rings featured in the eucharist

i'd be more inclined to bother god ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:39, archived) ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:39,

controversy

Actually, there is debate. Evolutionists think it's onion ring snack. Creationists think it's transform-a-snack. Who really knows. ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:44, archived) ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:44,

In a recent survey

32% of people said it was Transform-a-Snack



21% said it was KP onion rings

16% said it was ASDA onion rings

12% said it was Sainsbury's onion rings

11% said it was Tesco's onion rings

8% said it was onion rings from their local corner shop



Clearly the majority say Transform-a-Snack. The statistics don't lie. ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 13:30, archived) ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 13:30,

also, i saw this book in the window of a charity shop yesterday

my first recursion archived) ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:37,

*is tickled*

( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:39, archived) ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:39,

It's the training manual for new b3tans.

My favourite is page 4 - McCririck. ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:39, archived) ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:39,

Haha, that'll drive them mad

( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:41, archived) ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:41,

Hahaha

Ungrateful sods! ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:43, archived) ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:43,

Hahaha!

Why do we not propose this theory just to make the Christians happy?

Uncompromising cunts :D ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:46, archived) ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:46,

Lots of Christians do believe this

( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:48, archived) ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:48,

i've been told (i.e. [citation needed])

that fundamentalist creationism only really got going at the start of the 20th century, primarily as a response to the growing scientific interest in eugenics which a lot of people saw as A Bad Thing ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:55, archived) ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:55,

Could well be.

Evolution has been rather abused. I don't think religion does itself any favours by arguing so pointlessly against such a strong theory though. ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:59, archived) ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:59,

What amazes me is that given the constant 24 hour cycle of destruction that is the natural world

anybody actually worships this mythological concept



It would quite clearly be a complete psychopath ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 12:01, archived) ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 12:01,

have you not watched the lion king?*

it's the circle of life!



i have no problem with anyone who believes in a god. it's the idea that, if god created the entire universe and inspired the entire bible, that the latter should be the primary reference for all truth, despite the fact that the universe is a vastly superior work in every respect. THAT annoys me



*or, if you don't need the concept explained to you by elton john in short words: bambi ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 12:10, archived) ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 12:10,

I worked with a girl who designed props for the stage production off the lion king

and in a single sentence have spouted more reality than all the superstitious beliefs in the world



An ancient Chinese philosopher once said: "If there are ghosts, the highways would be extremely crowded with them"



Which they are not ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 12:19, archived) ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 12:19,

i now have an image of a street sweeper with a proton pack

i wish ghosts were real, just so that proton packs could be real ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 12:31, archived) ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 12:31,

Why do you think those sludge-gulper trucks need to have a big round chamber on the back?

The ghosts get washed into the drains, and have to be sucked out by a portable cyclotron.



It's the idea that you could fit one in a backpack that's just utterly preposterous. ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 13:09, archived) ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 13:09,

FUCK OFF WITH YOUR SCIENCE

WE DON'T NEED:

-PROLONGED LIFE THROUGH MEDICINE AND VARIOUS OTHER THINGS LIKE WATER PURIFICATION

-ENERGY EFFIENCY

-TO KNOW THE LAWS OF THE UNIVERSE



NOW JUST DICK OFF AND LEAVE US TO OUR THEORY THAT EVERYTHING WILL BE FINE IF WE DO NOTHING BUT TALK TO OUR COLLECTIVE IMAGINARY FRIEND ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 12:00, archived) ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 12:00,

Hahaha

archived) ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 11:49,

Arf!

( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 12:03, archived) ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 12:03,

excellent :)

( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 12:04, archived) ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 12:04,

FP! FP it hard!

( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 12:05, archived) ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 12:05,

Pfff!

True! ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 12:21, archived) ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 12:21,

The thing is,

if they let their preposterous argument just roll over and die and try and put forward a better one,

then that surely counts as evolution.



(Mind you, it's not like circular contradictions seem to bother them).



I was forced to attend this Baptist thing at the weekend. They had a wall picture with lots of little fish the kiddies had stuck on to make the scales of one big fish. The temptation to whip out a pen and draw legs on just one of them was overpowering... ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 12:44, archived) ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 12:44,

Not really; evolution applies only to living things, not to ideas or inanimate objects.

Ideas can 'evolve', after a fashion, but this isn't the same as the evolution of life. ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 18:10, archived) ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 18:10,

errrrrrr

no ( , Mon 25 Aug 2008, 16:55, archived) ( , Mon 25 Aug 2008, 16:55,

Heh heh

Brills ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 13:33, archived) ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 13:33,

Very much this

but please, stop thinking that everyone with belief is a fringe looney, the spread of looneys within religion is much the same as that without. ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 16:00, archived) ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 16:00,

i concur

but creationism in particular is daft ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 18:41, archived) ( , Sun 24 Aug 2008, 18:41,

Yes

Of course something that created billions of galaxies wants primates to bolster its' lack of self esteem by praising it. ( , Mon 25 Aug 2008, 15:11, archived) ( , Mon 25 Aug 2008, 15:11,

Come on,

I hate the bastard insignificant lot of you, but any bit of praise makes me glow all day. ( , Mon 25 Aug 2008, 18:58, archived) ( , Mon 25 Aug 2008, 18:58,

Right on the money with that one

Woos and Yays galore ( , Mon 25 Aug 2008, 21:55, archived) ( , Mon 25 Aug 2008, 21:55,

I LIKE THIS!

I LIKE YOU! ( , Tue 26 Aug 2008, 3:12, archived) ( , Tue 26 Aug 2008, 3:12,