What's in store for the Boston Celtics? Our panel of five looks back at the offseason moves (and nonmoves) and forward to what lies ahead in the 2013-14 NBA season.

Chris Forsberg, ESPN Boston: B+. The decision to step back and rebuild is never easy, but Boston got three future first-round picks for two of the league's top five active players in minutes played. The only pitfall: The Celtics are still tiptoeing the tax line and have an unbalanced roster heavy on shooting guards and power forwards. They'll fix both in time.

Israel Gutierrez, ESPN.com: Is a sad face a grade? It was a tad depressing to watch a franchise that has been considered a contender since 2007-08 finally break apart the nucleus that made it such. In the end, Danny Ainge did what's best for the organization, but we won't know how he did until the rebuilding is well underway.

Andrew Han, ClipperBlog: B+. Can you ever claim an A after releasing a championship coach (Doc Rivers) and trading away the team's most important player in a decade (Kevin Garnett) and one of the most important in franchise history (Paul Pierce)? Probably not, but Boston gets as close as possible for swapping its delicious trio of aging Roquefort and coach for not three, but four first-round picks. C'est bon.

Brendan Jackson, Celtics Hub: Incomplete. There is no adequate way to place a letter grade on the Celtics' offseason. They traded away two franchise players for multiple first-round picks. Their letter grade for this offseason is completely contingent on whether those picks allow them to recoup their losses. That and class participation.

Brian Robb, Celtics Hub: B. I wasn't thrilled with their decision to blow up the roster, but upon making that decision, Ainge went about it the best way he could. By acquiring numerous first-round picks and getting out of the luxury tax, he has positioned himself to rebuild the Celtics' roster quickly.

2. What's the biggest question facing the Celtics in 2013-14?

Forsberg: Which players are building blocks for the future? This team is going to take its lumps, but the 2013-14 season is all about identifying which players it will build with moving forward (Rajon Rondo? Jeff Green?) and trying to trade away the bodies that won't be here long-term to help unclog its cap.

Gutierrez: How well can Brad Stevens adjust to coaching in the NBA? Regardless of what he has to work with -- and it's honestly not terrible -- if his players don't believe this college guru can translate to the NBA, it will never work. One way to tell if his players are buying in: how hard/well this team plays defense.

Han: How does Rondo fit in? Boston's floor general will be sidelined for the first part of the season as he recovers from an ACL injury. But do the Celtics need a top-tier point guard on a great contract as they embark on the biggest Boston project since the Big Dig?

Jackson: Will Rondo be the face of the next Celtics era, or will he be used to acquire it? Setting aside the fact that Rondo might not even be healthy enough to play, the more intriguing question is whether he fits into the Celtics' long-term plans. Is he the next Pierce or Antoine Walker?

Robb: What's the plan for Rondo? Will he return sooner rather than later from his ACL tear, or does he take a cautious approach like Derrick Rose? Once Rondo is back healthy, Ainge must decide if he's a cornerstone of the franchise for years to come or the team's most attractive trade chip in the midst of rebuilding.

3. Who is the Celtics' most intriguing player?

Forsberg: Kelly Olynyk. Boston shuffled up to No. 13 to grab the Gonzaga big man, then Ainge (somewhat oddly) declared that he envisions Olynyk as merely a complementary player. Early returns show a skilled offensive player who, if he develops defensively, could pair with Jared Sullinger in the frontcourt of the future.