Article content

We read in the March 2 StarPhoenix with consternation that permanent downtown bike lanes could cost as much as $4.6 million. As property owners, we hope the city does not expect taxpayers to foot the bill. Pet owners (cats and dogs) must get a licence from the city, no exceptions, yet bike riders can ride on any street.

Since bike riders can pedal their bikes almost anywhere, where is the insurance protecting them or anyone else in an accident? Bikes are considered to be vehicles, just like cars or trucks. We think it is time city hall revisited bike licences. Not too many years ago, all bikes had to have a licence, and it was mandatory. Why should bike riders be allowed to bike anywhere downtown without insurance or the right to navigate anywhere downtown?

We apologize, but this video has failed to load.

tap here to see other videos from our team. Try refreshing your browser, or Letter of the Day: Cyclists should pay for bike lanes Back to video

If bike owners had to buy a licence, the money generated would help to offset the special requirements of bike riders, and their feeling of entitlement to ride almost anywhere, not to mention covering the cost of setting up these “special” privileged bike lanes.