In a previous entry in this year’s Vimways advent blogging, Samuel Walladge detailed how to make Vim and Git work together… since it was quite good, I figured I would write a similar entry about making Vim and Mercurial work together! And to do so, I’m totally going to plagiarize Samuel’s article structure! Let’s dive in.

The Mercurial perspective

Just like Git, Mercurial needs to open a text editor for some operations:

editing commit messages.

editing history (the “interactive” half of what Git calls “interactive rebasing”).

Mercurial also needs to open some kind of tool (not necessarily a text editor… but you can guess which tool we’ll use!) for some other operations:

showing a diff.

resolving a merge.

Editing commit messages

Just like Git and pretty much every other tool in existence, Mercurial checks the $EDITOR environment variable to know what text editor to use. And just like Git, it also offers a configuration setting for when it’s easier to set it this way:

[ui] editor = vim

If you have both $EDITOR and ui.editor set, Mercurial favours ui.editor .

Once you’ve run hg commit and Vim opens, you can type your commit message as usual. If you change your mind, you can do :cq and exit Vim with a non-zero exit code, which Mercurial will detect and abort the commit. Otherwise, :wq will exit normally and Mercurial will proceed.

Editing history

Where Git has git rebase --interactive to do both rebasing and history editing, Mercurial has two different operations: hg rebase to rebase, and hg histedit to edit history. Rebasing doesn’t require the involvement of a text editor, but history editing does.

First, Mercurial doesn’t let you edit history by default. It wants you to consciously opt-in to this type of tricky command, by enabling the extension it comes in:

[extensions] histedit =

Once that’s done, you’ll get the hg histedit command, which as usual reads the $EDITOR environment variable and the ui.editor configuration setting. The text buffer that will open in Vim will look very similar to the one from Git’s interactive rebase, so just use ciw , dd , and p or P .

Showing a diff

Using hg diff prints out a diff in the terminal. To use an external tool, you’ll need to enable another extension (yes, Mercurial is [big on forcing you to enable extensions][3], sadly):

[extensions] extdiff =

Then you can configure one or more “external diff tools” for Mercurial to use, like, for instance:

[extdiff] cmd.vimdiff = vimdiff

You can then run hg vimdiff ... and it will open Vim in diff mode over the changed file. Sadly, it only works fine for cases where you’re only diffing a single file. If you pass a revision that touched multiple files, the extdiff extension will copy the previous/next versions of those files into a pair of temporary directories, and pass those to Vim. Vim doesn’t have anything to handle directory diffing out of the box.

The standard solution for this is to install the DirDiff Vim plugin, which does exactly what the title implies. Its only drawback is that it’s not very friendly to non-traditional Unix setups – Windows, or using Fish as your shell, among other examples, make the Vim plugin fail.

You can still try it yourself by following the example on the Extdiff extension’s wiki page:

[extdiff] # add new command called vimdiff, runs gvimdiff with DirDiff plugin # (see http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=102) # Non english user, be sure to put "let g:DirDiffDynamicDiffText = 1" in # your .vimrc cmd.vimdiff = vim opts.vimdiff = -f '+next' '+execute "DirDiff" fnameescape(argv(0)) fnameescape(argv(1))'

A note on your working directory

Watch out for plugins or scripts you might have in your .vimrc that change the working directory! I had some issues with my configuration of vim-projectroot which I had setup to automatically cd into the current buffer’s project root. This messed up extdiff because the way it runs the external tool is:

Set the current working directory to a temporary folder that contains the 2 sub-folders with all the files’ snapshots.

Pass the name of those 2 sub-folders as arguments to the external tool.

As such, if Vim’s current working directory is changed by the time it executes DirDiff , it will fail to find anything.

Resolving a merge

Thankfully, resolving merges with Vim’s 3-way diff mode is supported pretty much out of the box. In most distros’ Mercurial package, there’s actually a lot of external tools supported for resolving merges in Mercurial. Check them out by typing hg config merge-tools .

The one we’re interested in is, of course, declared as vimdiff . Unless your Mercurial install was somehow packaged differently for your OS, it should look a bit like this:

merge-tools.vimdiff.args=$local $other $base -c 'redraw | echomsg "hg merge conflict, type \":cq\" to abort vimdiff"' merge-tools.vimdiff.check=changed merge-tools.vimdiff.priority=-10

At this point, you just need to bump the priority in your own .hgrc if it doesn’t pick it up by default because it finds another available tool with a higher priority on your system:

[merge-tools] vimdiff.priority = 99

The default configuration puts the “local” file on the left, the “other” file in the centre, and the “base” file on the right. I prefer to have the “base” file in the middle, so I can better reason about how each side (left and right) modified the code from that base version… so I just copied the default setting and switched up the arguments in my configuration file:

[merge-tools] vimdiff.args=$local $base $other -c 'redraw | echomsg "hg merge conflict, type \":cq\" to abort vimdiff"' vimdiff.priority=99

From there, you can do a mix of diffget / diffput (with do and dp as their default bindings… people usually remember do as “diff obtain”), and ad-hoc editing for trickier situations. Unlike a normal diff, however, you can’t use do and dp directly: you have to specify which buffer you’re putting in or obtaining from. The buffers in this case are simply numbered from left to right (1 is “local”, 2 is “base”, 3 is “remote”) so you can do 3do or 1dp and such. Alternatively, you can change your statusline to display %n when a buffer has &diff enabled, but I don’t find that necessary.

The Vim perspective

Vanilla

As the original article explains with Git, a quick way to run Mercurial from inside Vim is to use any of:

:!hg , which will execute the Mercurial process in a new shell. Unless you add some fancy syntax around it, it has the downsides of blocking Vim until the process exits, and not being able to interact with that process (like entering input).

Here you can make use of Vim’s % shorthand for the current buffer, like with :!hg add % .

:terminal , which gives you a shell where you can run Mercurial and any other command line tool.

And, again from the original article, you can check some common Vim configuration details to auto-reload files when you do an operation that changes your working copy (e.g. hg update ), highlight conflict markers, and so on.

A note on conflict markers

Note however that Mercurial doesn’t leave conflict markers by default. That’s because it will just run some non-interactive pre-merge step using its own internal merging algorithm, and will run the external tool (which we just configured above to be Vim) if it finds any conflicts… in which case it shows you “clean” files for you to resolve.

As a result, you will only see conflict markers if you specifically changed Mercurial’s configuration to do that. For example, you may change the pre-merge step to be :keep-merge3 .

Given the sheer amount of customizability that Mercurial’s merging gives you, this goes way out of scope for this article, but if you’re not happy with how it works, check out the merge-tools configuration section help and the help page on merge tools. There’s really little chance you can make it work exactly the way you want.

Plugins

Since Mercurial is a lot less popular than Git, it also has a lot less available plugins for Vim.

I can start with a shameless plug (hohoho) for my plugin!

Written by yours truly, it started as a port of Fugitive for Mercurial, but it has since taken a life of its own. I think it’s pretty solid, but you may find that it breaks down a bit if your workflow differs too much from mine. That’s what bug reports and pull request are for, though!

It provides you with an interactive hg status window, easy ways to show diffs in various ways, some basic hg log and hg annotate views, and more.

Check it out and report back!

Already mentioned in the original article, Signify gives you an idea of what you modified in the current buffer. Unlike Gitgutter, which the original article also recommends, Signify works with a multitude of VCSes, including Mercurial.

This article was originally posted on the author’s blog.