As most already know, I’m quite an outspoken critic of the alt-right. To be honest, most of that is because they scream that I’m a “Jew” for hot hating Jews, and call me a “sperg” for questioning their ability to effect change as keyboard warriors. Though a big part of it is also because I don’t feel as if your average alt-righter is very intelligent, continually misdefining terms like “straw-man” and, my favorite, “civic nationalism.”

I’ll shelve my other criticisms for now, like their hostility and amazing breadth of do-nothingness. No offense, but least Antifa and Black Lives Matter mobilize. You get handful of them in one place IRL, and some fat bozo goes Twisted Metal in a f*cking Honda. And while some of these people are guys and gals I’d legit consider my friends, many of them are potato IQs who can literally look at a definition of civic nationalism, and by the time they read it aloud through their filter, it comes out with the crispness of SJW postmodernist word salad.

So, what the f*ck am I even talking about, right? Well, a few countries in Western Europe would be a prime example of the alt-right screwing the pooch on what civic nationalism is. Before we go further, allow me to take a minute to set the stage with the juxtaposition: What civic nationalism actually is vs. how the alt-right define it. I have checked literally over ten definitions of civic nationalism. Here’s basically how it’s defined: “Civic nationalism is a kind of nationalism identified by political philosophers who believe in a non-xenophobic form of nationalism compatible with values of freedom, tolerance, equality, and individual rights…”

In a nutshell, civ-nat would be a diverse—in its real sense, not its SJW sense—nation of multiple races and ethnicities and cultures, given the same freedoms and held to the same standards.

Before you argue that X cannot follow the values and are incompatible, that’s not what civic nationalism aims to accomplish. It’s not a political theory stating that everyone will act the same. This is where the alt-right slips. It’s a political theory about implementing standards the same. E.g. If a white person is a rapist, they’re objectively not living up to the cultural values, so they’re punished. Likewise, if a Muslim is a rapist, they’re also punished. With civic nationalism, you’re essentially demanding an adherence to cultural values. Even in all-white societies there is crime, and the criminals are punished.

(Yes, nonwhites commit more crime per capita. Speak to Battle Beagle about that; this doesn’t have anything to do with civ-nat.)

Now let’s use a quick case study, which is really going to be like a super-long tweet because I’m hungover and f*ck doing math: The UK.

The UK is a country of over 65-million people. It’s a majority white nation that has obviously decided “English” is not an ethnicity but rather a state of mind. Makes sorta-kinda sense for America to think this way; though genetics pretty much nail British down as an ethnicity, and there’s no getting around that, save ignoring the facts.

Anyway, my point: They’ve been importing Muslims like they’re telling Sweden to hold their beer while they show ’em how it’s really done. This has led to some insanely atrocious Pakistani rape gangs who combined, by some estimates, have raped over one million underage white girls. And we all know how they feel about these white girls, treating them lower than animals.

Now, many on the alt-right smugly and rhetorically ask, “How’s that civic nationalism working out for ya!?”

It’s funny to me because A) Do you even civ-nat, bro? And B) Civic nationalism would apply the standards the same way; e.g. government would break up these gangs, imprison the perpetrators, send the rest back, and actually work to protect the girls to not only seek justice for victims but also to prevent it going forward.

We see exactly none of this in the UK. Tommy Robinson, for calling attention to it, is punished more harshly and more immediately than actual savages who flock to the UK with the sole intent of brutally defiling little white infidels. The authorities have objectively covered it up. This is not even a point of debate; empirically, demonstrably, the people who are charged with protecting UK citizens have allowed girls to be viciously raped and groomed in a Stalin-style “there’s no murder in paradise” avoidance and dismissal of the situation. Hell, some authorities have even joined in and raped the girls further!

You can call this a lot of things, but civic nationalism is not among them. To suggest this is civic nationalism is to ignore its definition and to act like an SJW, whereby you redefine “racism” again and again until which point being white means being racist. C’mon, guys. I speak to a lot of you. You’re better than this!

It’s cowardice. It’s corruption. It’s a blatant disregard for a nation’s values, whereas civic nationalism is expressly about holding everyone to a shared value system. What’s happening right now in the UK, adding in the numerous acid attacks, stabbings and outright terrorist attacks, is an example of horrible government that’s nothing at all like civic nationalism. Now, the alt-right and I might find some common ground in calling this population replacement, or even a form of white genocide (though I’d have my quibbles about that). But what we can’t agree on is that this is in any way civic nationalism.

We can jump up to Sweden and see the same thing. Allowing for these no-go zones, letting riots break out, not protecting native Swedish women against thousands upon thousands of rapes every year – this is a sort of ideology by those in charge that is diametrically opposite civic nationalism.

I’m not singing the praises of a civ-nat society. All I’m saying is that we haven’t really tried it. UK, Sweden, Germany, France, Canada, Australia, and even in America – this is not civic nationalism the idiots are trying. It’s something far more sinister and more blatantly and immediately destructive.

New Hampshire wanting to force white people out and replace them with nonwhites is not civic nationalism. A civ-nat approach would be to allow it to happen organically, and use the legal system to hold everyone to account equally for their actions.

Let me reiterate: I get along well (enough) with quite a few people in the alt-right. And at the end of the day, to use an overused phrase, we want relatively the same thing: Safe and prosperous homelands for our people, where our elected officials don’t go against our wishes by importing third-world savages into our neighborhoods.

And as a quick aside, that’s the kicker. Politicians allowing the flood of third-world people aren’t housing them in their gated compounds. They’re placing them next door to you and me, next door to our 12-year-old daughters who end up missing, raped repeatedly, and often killed. And then we go seeking justice, and we’re bigger criminals than the rapists for expecting society to do what our ancestors built it to do – protect us.

I write this not to chastise the alt-right, but rather because I’m sick of fake-ass people in political movements. We have enough of this shit with the progressive left, constantly changing words and terms on a whim to serve their purpose.

So if you’re gonna go around and scream that the Jews run the world and it’s white genocide, etc, at least seek to use correct terminology, if you want to be taken seriously.

Whatever’s happened, whatever one could call it, it is not civic nationalism.