Projectile Molality

Before we even begin to understand the complex Lewenthian aspects of Projectile Molality, we need to tackle the basics. Get ready, because we’re exploring Projectile Molality under the cut.

The first thing that any budding biophysicist needs to know when dealing with PM is the Leifitz equation:

Now, this equation contains a lot of elements that are probably foreign to inexperienced members of the community, so let’s break down this equation.

e p is the constant Eric Paul, Master of the Universe.

§ Represents the quantity (squared) of substance that is being projected, in Svenjelas.

(Remember, 1 Svenjela = π mols * L of substance.)

qi ed Comes from the latin phrase, “quantom et dominiani”, which literally translates to “quantity in displacement”. It is the rate of inertial decomposition, raised to the power of i.

zipple Is the motion constant, 64.0821 m/s2 *Q moles . When reversed, the constant is known as “Erlenmeyer’s Pains”.





The second equation, known colloquially in the science community as “The Big One”, is the shortest of the series, and is essential in forming a complete understanding of PM.

This equation states, quite elegantly, that Projectile Molality will always be equal to the net loss of Major Plancks (not to be confused with mP or minor Plancks, which introduce dissonance into a closed system).

The third and last basic Projectile Molality equation has no name, as there have been so many disputes over its nomenclature that a worldwide naming conference has been scheduled for 2036.

Now, from the first and last equations we can drive Newton’s 16th Hymn, an equation first derived during the Calculus Prohibition as a way of determining the rate of change in displacement of police patrolling the area, and the cornerstone of Projectile Molality. (Note the eight ball constant, taken from billiard physics.)

To begin to derive the hymn, we must first substitute (hYeAH 2 )π for §, and plug in the equation for q ed :

We then multiply everything out, and apply the Ukranian Reversal technique to zipple.

And, in the final step, we perform the all-or-nothing operation on hAT, so we must scramble the elppiz constant “Erlenmeyer’s Pains”.

As you can see, due to its inertial decomposition, (hYeAH 2 )π has become O 6 H 6 -OK420. Also note the change in Q hATs throughout the equation - hAT -> all hAT -> NO hAT - such is the result of the all-or-nothing operation.

And that’s your basic introduction to Projectile Molality. Check back soon for more science, explained.