Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:41 pm

So "Bitcoin.com" has sold out - supporting segshit.



No good supporting segshit, getting that up and running, then moving your hash over to bccash in a few months.

If you had integrity, there would be no segshit.



Ver rants on about Bitcoin being stifled, how we need bigger blocks, he supports classic and nchain. then turnscoat and votes to destroy all they and he have worked for.



WTF. Has no one got the balls to stand up for Bitcoin round here.

Even though I agree with you on SegWit, I disagree with your assessment that Roger and Bitcoin.com is making the wrong move here. Integrity means a lot, and to renege on the NYA now would be just the chink-in-the-armour that trolls need to discredit Roger forever. That's even if BCC does win the BTC war. "Remember that one time you promised to do one thing, then stabbed them in the back?"What the statement does is two things: 1) Provide for the freedom of cloud miners to switch some of Bitcoin.com's hash to BCC without officially supporting it, and 2) Send the veiled threat that if the 2MB block increase doesn't go through as also agreed at the NYA, Bitcoin.com will be free to abandon the agreement without repercussion.Personally, I like it. What #2 does is probably make it even MORE likely the signatories of the NYA will cancel the 2MB increase out of both spite and the knowledge that there will already be another chain with big blocks so f*ck 'em.The only thing I would have added to the statement is a final out in the unlikely case the hashrate of BCC quickly surpasses BTC, or even surpasses it sometime down the road. The statement above makes it sound like Bitcoin.com is 100% committed to the SegWit2x chain, even if it falters.