A few days ago, it occurred to me that US, NATO, and EU policies are pro-Islamic.

From observation, it now appears that US domestic policy is also pro-Islamic and anti-Christian/European.

Although it is difficult to obtain information in the US that is not severely distorted or even contrary to reality, it appears that three moslems attacked a Christmas party in California. The propaganda response from the US government and the Cathedral (the New York Times) was unanimous: the problem is guns.

This is contrary to observable reality.

A firearm is a tool. It no more causes violence than a hammer causes construction. In both cases, it is human beings who create or destroy, employing whatever tool is best for the job.

The proper response to Islamic violence in the West is to remove Islam from the West. It is not to remove tools from Westerners. And yet the Cathedral response to this latest Islamic outrage is to call for gun control laws specifically aimed at law-abiding citizens, i.e. non-moslems.

Criminals do not obey laws. Only law abiding citizens obey laws.

In calling for gun control laws, the Cathedral is acting in concert with violent Islam against peaceful European-Americans who obey laws and would use weapons defensibly.

This comes less than a week after government-orchestrated pro-criminal and anti-police demonstrations in Chicago, Minneapolis, and elsewhere in the US, paid for by George Soros.

Certain elements within the US government continue to import tens of thousands of moslems. This is contrary to the national interest. And yet it continues…

Observation: US domestic policy encourages violent Islam and violent anti-police criminals while calling for the disarming of law-abiding citizens, i.e. Christian/European-Americans.

Farooq Saeed, aka Dindu al-Nuffeen: