So, Rev-visionist left wants round three. Last time it took you a little while to respond, but now you’re paying better attention. If you watched the last video you know I called them out once against to prove their accusation against me. And once again they were unable to do so. They claimed I dodged the accusation, but I called THEM out to prove their claims. But they never did because their full of shit. The whole forum is full of shit.

Now they have replied promptly and this is the message I received from someone carrying their words to me because I’m not a forum member:

Also, MoaistRebel, reveal yourself, I need to know who I should stop respecting. It’s like selective argumentation, making a strawman by omitting all the ‘evidence’ presented. Obviously, he’s probably doing this for some “revolutionary rep/cred” from his viewers; some who may not even know revleft exists. (perhaps bad press is good in this case) this one has significantly lower production value than the first.

Reveal myself? You mean like give out my real name? So what? So you can harass my family? Please weak talk form cheap thought.

You are accusing me of “selective argumentation” and strawman? What argument? I asked you if you had Cuban government permission to use Che’s image. I’m guessing by the fact you won’t respond to that in your own forum that you don’t. And how am I trying to get “revolutionary cred” you made an accusation against me! You started this whole thing! You made claims that you can’t back up. You started this whole confrontation with me. You are trying to get revolutionary cred off of me.

And seriously, my viewers know what revleft is, and my videos are the same production vale. Cheap red herring comments from someone who can’t back up their accusations.

Now this time something was different. When I called him out on using Che’s image without Cuban government permission he sent me a message personally. Don’t bother spamming the account, its just a sock.

Wrong, look it up, Castro himself made a statement in response to this issue and billboards, he said Che belongs to the people of the world. The US government has decided that its public domain.

Actually asshole when Castro said that he wasn’t referring to any copyrights at all. So just like the right wing you deliberately take Castro’s word’s out of context. You deserve the title rev-visionist. And really, you go by what the US government said about CUBAN property? Hahaha, seriously? The people who feel they own Cuba say it’s okay for you to use Cuba’s property? You really are revisionist. This is how he responded to that:

I am still making money off these T-Shirts, loser. Where are your T-shirts? Where is your online store? You can’t even make an online store because you are liable for all the material you’ve stolen, ha-ha-ha

Well now that you mention it I am working on a line of T-Shirts. Cary123 is helping me make some designs. And what’s this about you building an online store? With other people’s content? The Cuban people’s content. And you made the I stole from the SEP argument again without backing it up again. This is must be the way RevLeft does business. Accusations without evidence. You’re owned again you little punk. You can’t even defend your theft while you falsely accuse others of it.

But let me show you how it’s done. This here is proof that RevLeft is a bunch of Zionist pedophiles.

This was the thread last year on Roman Polanski. Observe The Anarchist Tension (that’s the guy’s name), the most powerful admin on the site and the excuses he makes for that cretinous pedophile.

“13 is the age of consent in various countries including South Korea and Mexico. Some could argue that America’s (and other peoples) social conservatism is the problem.”

That disguises his pedophile politics through his rants against the age of consent, but everyone sees him for the pedo he is.

“How many of us have had sexual fantasies about children or “youths”? Perhaps it was a flash in the recesses of masturbation? Perhaps you’ve even entertained elaborate narratives or role played with partners? How many of us are truly prepared to admit that, at some point, as transient or as complex as it may have been, we have considered what it was like to have sex with a child? That “right” to have sex with children was taken away with the creation of the age of consent, which came into existence as a reaction to child prostitution during in the thirteenth century. It was allegedly quite popular and to tackle this problem they had the bright idea of setting the age that children could legally have sex (with anyone) at twelve. This was raised to thirteen six hundred years later in the Victorian era, as is the case in some Latin American countries and South Korea now, incidentally. The age of consent in the UK as it stands is sixteen, but in other European countries the age is mostly fourteen. These ages are so inconsistent around the word, both historically and in a contemporary sense that they appear totally arbitrary”

And it’s not just this one admin. Here you find 3 moderators (names in purple) talking about legalizing child pornography for the sexual release of pedophiles:

“While those who feel sexual attraction to children are chastised from society and isolated, child abuse will be a logical consequence. This whole field of discussion has (almost) lost all rationality. Articles like this are refreshing. After all sexual desire is a human instinct, if that maniesfts itself in attraction to children then who is anybody to condemn as long as the individual concerned handles that desire appropriately. I’d much rather have images of children available than have state enforce their morality and impose restrictions of who one can and cannot look at and find attractive.”

And just recently, someone rumbled their super secret forums and exposed their internal discussions on legalizing child porn. Check links 4 and 5.

Link 6 was a REJECTED proposal to restrict Zionists. But the site owner Malte (aka Edelweiss on the board), is a petit bourgeois Zionist who runs revleft as an appendage to his che t-shirt store. Malte is a hardcore acolyte of ISSrael, and he has posted attacks against Lebanese anarchists and communists for siding with Hezbollah against the Zionist settler colony, calling them class traitors.

And for link 7: Is it any wonder that ISSrael is notorious for harbouring pedophiles?

That’s how it’s done, that’s how you make an accusation and back it up. Rev-visionist Left has been exposed for the Zionist Pedophiles that they are.

Link 1:

http://www.revleft.com/vb/roman-polanski-t118813/index.html

Link 2:

http://www.revleft.com/vb/paedophiles-anonymous-article-t81859/index.html?t=81859

Link 3:

http://www.revleft.com/vb/wikileaks-insight-into-t112069/index.html

Link 4:

http://www.revleft.com/vb/liberal-t140350/index.html?p=1837961&#post1837961

Link 5:



Link 6:

http://www.revleft.com/vb/maltes-comment-hezbollah-t71487/index.html?p=1082403#post1082403

Link 7:

http://failedmessiah.typepad.com/failed_messiahcom/2010/01/israel-lags-behind-west-in-antipedophile-legislation-enforcement-234.html