Baz Posted in reply to Kelet



Permalink Reply

On Wednesday, 8 April 2015 at 20:07:42 UTC, Kelet wrote: > On Wednesday, 8 April 2015 at 17:58:18 UTC, Kelet wrote: >> On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 05:45:16 UTC, Baz wrote: >>> I'm pleased to announce the first beta of Coedit, the small IDE for the D programming language, based on DMD. >>> >>> This version introduces: >>> - the option editor. >>> - metad, a meta GIT repository composed of static libraries easily buildable with Coedit. >>> - DCD integration: call tips and DDoc comments as hints. >>> - symbol list based on libdparse (formerly called the _static explorer_) >>> >>> Links: >>> - Change log and short intro to the new features: >>> - Binaries for win32: >>> - Binaries for Nux64: I'm pleased to announce the first beta of Coedit, the small IDE for the D programming language, based on DMD.This version introduces:- the option editor.- metad, a meta GIT repository composed of static libraries easily buildable with Coedit.- DCD integration: call tips and DDoc comments as hints.- symbol list based on libdparse (formerly called the _static explorer_)Links:- Change log and short intro to the new features: https:// github.com/ BBasile/ Coedit/ releases/ tag/beta_1 - Binaries for win32: https:// github.com/ BBasile/ Coedit/ releases/ download/ beta_1/ coedit.beta1. win32.zip - Binaries for Nux64: https:// github.com/ BBasile/ Coedit/ releases/ download/ beta_1/ coedit.beta1. linux64.zip >> >> Hi Baz, >> >> I'm glad to see another IDE on the playing field. Interesting that it's written in FreePascal and utilizing Lazarus components. I always thought it was a good but underutilized tool set. For now, I'm just reading the wiki (which is well-populated), but I look forward to giving it a try sometime soon. >> >> Cheers! On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 05:45:16 UTC, Baz wrote:Hi Baz,I'm glad to see another IDE on the playing field. Interesting that it's written in FreePascal and utilizing Lazarus components. I always thought it was a good but underutilized tool set. For now, I'm just reading the wiki (which is well-populated), but I look forward to giving it a try sometime soon.Cheers! > > Hi Baz, > > After a quick trial run, I'm quite impressed on how well it runs > on my rather sluggish computer. All of the features seem to be in > place and the documentation is well written. > > My only complaint lies in the seemingly low level of integration > between coedit and DUB. DUB is quickly becoming ubiquitous in the > D community. While it seems like I can build and execute my > project using DUB, I have to maintain 2 separate project > configurations -- one for DUB and one for coedit. > > Do you think you will ever be so inclined to have coedit support > opening a DUB package file (i.e., dub.json)? I think that would > sway me to becoming a regular user. > > But perhaps I misunderstand something here.. > > Thanks, On Wednesday, 8 April 2015 at 17:58:18 UTC, Kelet wrote:Hi Baz,After a quick trial run, I'm quite impressed on how well it runson my rather sluggish computer. All of the features seem to be inplace and the documentation is well written.My only complaint lies in the seemingly low level of integrationbetween coedit and DUB. DUB is quickly becoming ubiquitous in theD community. While it seems like I can build and execute myproject using DUB, I have to maintain 2 separate projectconfigurations -- one for DUB and one for coedit.Do you think you will ever be so inclined to have coedit supportopening a DUB package file (i.e., dub.json)? I think that wouldsway me to becoming a regular user.But perhaps I misunderstand something here..Thanks,