AWARD-WINNING

CASINO CRYPTO EXCLUSIVE

CLUBHOUSE 1500+

GAMES 2 MIN

CASH-OUTS 24/7

SUPPORT 100s OF

FREE SPINS PLAY NOW Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertised sitesare not endorsed by the BitcoinForum. They may be unsafe, untrustworty, orillegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.

minerpart



Offline



Activity: 280

Merit: 250



IIIIII====II====IIIIII







Sr. MemberActivity: 280Merit: 250IIIIII====II====IIIIII Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] January 01, 2014, 09:35:03 PM #6383 I think it's possible we might never go live on Crypto-Trade. The reason, in short, is the legislative body that regulates listed securities in the US.



If we consider that Ken has now created a real player in the BTC industry what should his main focus be?



What would you do?



Would you put the company at risk of prosecution by going live on a securities exchange again? Or would you wait a few extra weeks for Coloured Coin implementation?



I've no idea what Ken's plans are right now, but it it were me I would go the conservative, safe route at this stage. Why risk what we have spent so long building up just to bring share trading a few weeks further forward?

Ozymandias



Offline



Activity: 658

Merit: 250







Sr. MemberActivity: 658Merit: 250 Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] January 01, 2014, 09:46:39 PM #6384 Quote from: minerpart on January 01, 2014, 09:35:03 PM I think it's possible we might never go live on Crypto-Trade. The reason, in short, is the legislative body that regulates listed securities in the US.



If we consider that Ken has now created a real player in the BTC industry what should his main focus be?



What would you do?



Would you put the company at risk of prosecution by going live on a securities exchange again? Or would you wait a few extra weeks for Coloured Coin implementation?



I've no idea what Ken's plans are right now, but it it were me I would go the conservative, safe route at this stage. Why risk what we have spent so long building up just to bring share trading a few weeks further forward?



Last I checked coloured coins are in beta (so skipping CT is plausible) and much like VE brought up a few weeks (months?) ago, having a significant chunk of change locked up without access can make one... unhappy Last I checked coloured coins are in beta (so skipping CT is plausible) and much like VE brought up a few weeks (months?) ago, having a significant chunk of change locked up without access can make one... unhappy

theBishop



Offline



Activity: 14

Merit: 0







NewbieActivity: 14Merit: 0 Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] January 02, 2014, 12:01:55 AM #6395 Being pioneer is indeed risky. Govs can only control when we comply. Bitcoin did not ask for permission but will prevail. Mr Slaughter is very criticised but seems to always demonstrate agility and adaption. BTC is massive risk on every front. Invested people are understandably scared of losing. Mr Slaughter imo is playing long term advantage for shareholders as is very proud man. Maybe detrators wany piece of pie too. Im confused on this board and sceptical of silly negative remarks. Balanced discussion is welcome but far between yeah?