Send this page to someone via email

Facebook reiterated its policy of not removing misleading or bogus political ads Thursday, clarifying its own policies after CEO Mark Zuckerberg offered Congress confusing and sometimes incomplete testimony on the subject.

On Wednesday, in response to questions from House Financial Services Chairwoman Maxine Waters, Zuckerberg seemed to suggest Facebook did use third-party fact checkers to verify political ads. He contradicted himself moments later, saying the company did not want to get involved in verifying the truth of political claims.

“Somebody fact checks on ads? You contract with someone to do that. Is that right?” Waters asked Zuckerberg. “Yes,” he replied.

Later, during an exchange with U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, Zuckerberg explained that his company will not remove political ads from candidates — even if false — because he believes voters deserve unfiltered access to the words of politicians. He said exceptions would be made for political ads that encouraged violence or seek to suppress voting.

Story continues below advertisement

Facebook on Thursday sought to set the record straight, noting that while it will not fact check political ads from candidates, it does evaluate the accuracy of political ads from political advocacy groups or political action committees.

“In a democracy, people should decide what is credible, not tech companies,” the company wrote in a statement emailed to the Associated Press on Thursday. “That’s why – like other internet platforms and broadcasters – we don’t fact check ads from politicians.”

7:41 Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg grilled over Libra, political ads in heated Congressional hearing Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg grilled over Libra, political ads in heated Congressional hearing

Facebook’s policy is similar to those at other internet platforms, reflecting the reluctance of big tech companies to police political content on their platforms.

“Given the sensitivity around political ads, we have considered whether we should ban them altogether,” Facebook said in its statement to The Associated Press on Thursday. “But political ads are important for local candidates, up-and-coming challengers, and advocacy groups that use our platform to reach voters and their communities.”

Story continues below advertisement

CNN chief Jeff Zucker called Facebook’s policy not to monitor political ads for truth-telling “ludicrous” Thursday. He noted that his network recently rejected two ads that U.S. President Donald Trump’s campaign sought to air, saying they repeated allegations against former Vice President Joe Biden that had been proven false.

Facebook ran a similar ad.

Zuckerberg’s comments on Facebook’s hands-off policy also failed to satisfy Waters, who said Wednesday it would give “anyone Facebook labels a politician a platform to lie, mislead and misinform the American people, which will also allow Facebook to sell more ads. The impact of this will be a massive voter suppression effort.”

Earlier this month, Democratic presidential candidate and U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts created an intentionally false Facebook ad claiming that Zuckerberg had endorsed U.S. President Donald Trump for re-election. Warren did so to highlight her critique of Facebook’s political ad policies.

During his exchange with Ocasio-Cortez, Zuckerberg also made misleading comments about the company’s reliance on third-party fact checkers to evaluate false news stories posted to the site.

5:12 Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg delivers opening statement on Libra cryptocurrency before Congress Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg delivers opening statement on Libra cryptocurrency before Congress

Ocasio-Cortez asked Zuckerberg why Facebook had made the conservative publication The Daily Caller one of its third-party fact checkers.

Story continues below advertisement

In actuality, the fact checking company is Check Your Fact, a subsidiary of The Daily Caller. The Daily Caller was founded by Fox News Channel host Tucker Carlson, who has been criticized for declaring white supremacy a “hoax.”

“We actually don’t appoint the independent fact-checkers,” Zuckerberg said in a response. “They go through an independent organization … that has a rigorous standard for who they allow to serve as a fact-checker.”

Not so, said Baybars Orsek, who directs that organization, the International Fact-Checking Network at the St. Petersburg, Florida-based Poynter Institute.

“It is a misrepresentation of the program,” he said, explaining that his network works to certify fact-checking organizations, including Check Your Fact.

Facebook requires its fact checkers to be network certified but has the final say on which fact checkers it works with.

“They make their decisions based on their priorities,” he said. “We do not appoint fact checkers to work with Facebook.”

The Associated Press is a participant in Facebook’s initiative to fact-check and identify misinformation being shared widely online on Facebook’s platform.

Story continues below advertisement