Article content continued

The review found Raworth’s claims were legitimate, but details of the independent investigation were kept under wraps by the PMO due to privacy concerns.

A second woman, whose identity was never made public, also came forward with harassment allegations but those claims were deemed unfounded.

Photo by Twitter

An Alberta civil servant who lives in Edmonton, Raworth feels “thrown under the bus” by the secrecy surrounding the investigation.

Raworth said she and the unidentified accuser are willing to waive privacy if it means all parties involved, including Hehr, could be shown the report for the sake of ‘closure.’

“We’ve both been very clear that if they need to redact parts of it to protect other people’s privacy, fine — I’d waive mine and she would waive hers for sections to do with us,” Raworth said.

“It’s about us and we should be able to have access to that, instead of this government that speaks to transparency … holding that so close to the vest.”

In a statement to Postmedia, the PMO said “the findings of these investigations are not made public due to privacy considerations and to protect the integrity of the process.”

But those privacy concerns don’t just apply to Raworth, Hehr, and the unidentified complainant, but would also extend to any witnesses interviewed in the investigation.

Hehr previously said he doesn’t remember ever meeting Raworth but took responsibility for his actions, issuing an apology to both Raworth and the second accuser.