I have placed this in the General Conspiracies section for two reasons. One, I think that there absolutely is something amuck when a nation doesn't bother to explain the framework of it's Legal system to it's citizens; I may even go as far as to say there is a conspiracy to keep the citizens impotent and ignorant. Two, I wasn't exactly sure where to put this post. That being said, moderators feel free to move it as you see fit.Now for a little background on the situation.I live in the United States. I purposefully let my Driver's Lisence expire as I do not believe it is right to be forced to contract. In fact, we are protected from being forced into contracts. To be forced to contract is called entering a contract Under Duress and is in fact a feasible defense to void a contract entered into in such a manner. I recently got my Driving Without a Lisence ticket, truth be told; I was waiting for the day. Now it is time to go to court. I suppose I am making this post to hear other's opinions on the situation, and perhaps; for advice.Now for some background on why I am choosing to fight this battle.I think it is a gross injustice to force the Citizens of a State to Lisence themselves and their respective conveyance(s). In a sense, they are charging us extra to travel on our roadways. The road work in my State is funded by taxation of the fuel we use to propel our conveyances. That being said, simply by purchasing fuel we are paying for the Right to use the roadway. We should not be forced to do any sort of registering to use the roadways we fund. The Government, without regard to what body, has no right to know what conveyances I own, and therefore I am making the choice to stop registering my conveyances. I also am able to provide them with identification beyond that of a Driver's Lisence should they need it via a Passport or a State Issued ID.I have court in early December. It is a Municipal Court as the Law I broke was in fact an Ordinance. An Ordinance is a Law enacted by a Municipal Corporation. Yes, a Corporation. A Municipal Corporation only has the power to conduct business within the private sector. They only have the right to contract with you, and if you know anything about Contractual Law, that means they must have your consent. A consent I refuse to give them.So now for my defense.When I am asked to plea, I will reply;“I do not plead to courts of contracts. An Ordinance is a Law enacted by a Municipal Corporation. A Municipal Corporation only has the power to conduct business within the private sector, in which case I am not a Corporation but a natural born person and I am reserving all rights and benefits without prejudice provided for me under Uniform Commercial Code Book 1 Section 1-207, whereby I can reserve my Common Law Right to not be compelled to perform under any Contract or Agreement, that I have not entered into knowingly, voluntarily, or intentionally, and that reservation serves as notice to all Administrative Agencies of Government, Nationally, State, and Locally, that I do not, and will not, accept the liability associated with the "Compelled Benefit" of any unrevealed Commercial Agent. I am here today under protest and duress as I have only appeared under threat of imprisonment and refuse to allow you to create a joinder between myself, the natural born person, and ****** **** ****, the Corporation created for me at birth.”I am thinking this alone should have the case dismissed, but should the "Judge" wish to carry on I will ask for the courts to provide an Injured Party with a Verified Complaint. Should the "Judge" fail to come forth with an injured party I will remind him/her of Uniform Commercial Code 1-103, "The Code is complimentary to the Common Law, which remains in force, except where displaced by the code. A statute should be construed in harmony with the Common Law, unless there is clear legislative intent to abrogate the Common Law." I will remind the "Judge" that the Code cannot be read to preclude a Common Law action, which I took by reserving my Rights under U.C.C. 1-207.If the "Judge" tries to carry on with a charade I will state, "Sir, I can sue you under the Common Law, for violating my rights under the Uniform Commercial Code. I have a remedy, under the UCC, to restore my rights under the Common Law. I have exercised the remedy, and now you must construe this Ordinance in harmony with the Common Law. To be in harmony with the Common Law, you must come forth with the damaged party."That statement should be the game breaker if all else fails.Any questions, comments, concerns; feel free to reply. No post is too large or too small. Except maybe one liners?