The Trump administration had already been facing questions over its dubious claim that the U.S. killed Soleimani because he was plotting an “imminent” attack against the U.S. Members of Congress had also derided the administration for the briefing it gave to justify the assassination, with lawmakers saying officials provided no evidence. And then later last week, Trump first claimed that Soleimani was plotting to attack one American embassy, then embellished his statement to claim multiple embassies were under threat, before finally telling Fox News on Friday: “I can reveal I believe it probably would’ve been four embassies.”

On Sunday, Esper clearly contradicted Trump’s claim when he appeared on CBS’ Face the Nation. When asked if there wasn’t any specific piece of evidence to indicate four embassies were under threat, he said, “I didn’t see one with regard to four embassies.” On CNN, Esper said, “There was intelligence that there was an intent to target the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad.” Despite Esper’s admission that there was no intelligence to support Trump’s claim, he said during both appearances that Trump “believed” four embassies were under threat and that he shared the president’s assumption.

Murdoch-owned outlets couldn’t agree on what Esper did.

Despite Esper’s contradiction, the New York Post and Fox & Friends co-host Ainsley Earhardt emphasized that the defense secretary had backed Trump up: