As a percentage of world inhabitants, the white population will

plummet to a single digit (9.76%) by 2060 from a high-water mark of

27.98% in 1950.

Using 2010 as the base reference, the big gainer in the population

derby will be blacks or sub-Sahara Africans. This group will expand

almost 133% to 2.7 billion by 2060. By the middle of this century

blacks will represent 25.38% of world population, which is up

dramatically from the 8.97% they recorded in 1950.

The big population story of the 21st Century is shaping up to be the

status reversal of whites and blacks and the Indian baby boom. A side

bar will be the single digit minority role that whites will assume. Of

the 7 population groups studied, only whites are projected to sustain

an absolute decline in numbers.

In 1950 whites and blacks were respectively 27.98% and 8.97% of world

population. By 2060 these figures will almost reverse as blacks surge

to 25.38% and whites shrink to 9.76%. From 2010 the white population

will decline while blacks will add 1.2 billion to their numbers. In

this time frame the the Indian subcontinent will gain 1.2 billion

people. These groups and their governments will be looking for elbow

room, and the diminished presence of whites in Europe, and especially

in the relatively wide open spaces North America, will provide such an

opportunity. Specifically, countries like Canada, the United States,

Argentina, Brazil, Australia, New Zealand, and Russia can expect to be

pressured to accept collectively hundreds of millions of refugees from

India, and sub-Sahara Africa.

http://www.nationalpolicyinstitute.org/publications.php?b=population

The Utter Normality Of Ethonationalism—Except For Whites by Prof Kevin

McDonald http://www.vdare.com/macdonald/080327_muller.htm

Kevin MacDonald's The Culture of Critique Reviewed by Stanley Hornbeck

http://www.csulb.edu/~kmacd/review-AR.html

In The Culture of Critique, Kevin MacDonald advances a carefully

researched but extremely controversial thesis: that certain 20th

century intellectual movements -- largely established and led by Jews

-- have changed European societies in fundamental ways and destroyed

the confidence of Western man. He claims that these movements were

designed, consciously or unconsciously, to advance Jewish interests

even though they were presented to non-Jews as universalistic and even

utopian. He concludes that the increasing dominance of these ideas has

had profound political and social consequences that benefited Jews but

caused great harm to gentile societies. This analysis, which he makes

with considerable force, is an unusual indictment of a people

generally thought to be more sinned against than sinning.

The intellectual movements Prof. MacDonald discusses in this volume

are Marxism, Freudian psychoanalysis, the Frankfurt school of

sociology, and Boasian anthropology. Perhaps most relevant from a

racial perspective, he also traces the role of Jews in promoting multi-

culturalism and Third World immigration. Throughout his analysis Prof.

MacDonald reiterates his view that Jews have promoted these movements

as Jews and in the interests of Jews, though they have often tried to

give the impression that they had no distinctive interests of their

own. Therefore Prof. MacDonald's most profound charge against Jews is

not ethnocentrism but dishonesty -- that while claiming to be working

for the good of mankind they have often worked for their own good and

to the detriment of others. While attempting to promote the

brotherhood of man by dissolving the ethnic identification of

gentiles, Jews have maintained precisely the kind of intense group

solidarity they decry as immoral in others.

Immigration Prof. MacDonald argues that it is entirely natural for

Jews to promote open immigration. It brings about the "diversity" Jews

find comforting and it keeps America open to persecuted co-

religionists throughout the world. He says Jews are the only group

that has always fought for mass immigration; a few European ethnic

organizations have made sporadic efforts to make it easier for their

own people to come, but only Jews have consistently promoted open

borders for all comers. Moreover, whatever disagreements they may have

had on other issues, Jews of every political persuasion have favored

high immigration.

This, too, goes back many years, and Prof. MacDonald traces in

considerable detail the sustained Jewish pro-immigration effort.

Israel Zangwill, author of the eponymous 1908 play The Melting Pot,

was of the view that "there is only one way to World Peace, and that

is the absolute abolition of passports, visas, frontiers, custom

houses... " He was nevertheless an ardent Zionist and disapproved of

Jewish intermarriage.

Although the statue of liberty, properly known as Liberty Enlightening

the World, was a gift to the United States from France as a tribute to

American political traditions, the sonnet by the Jewish Emma Lazarus

helped change it into a symbol of immigration. Affixed to the base of

the statue several decades after its construction, the poem welcomes

to America "huddled masses yearning to breath free/The wretched refuse

of your teeming shore."

Prof. MacDonald has discovered that implausible arguments about

diversity being a quintessentially American strength have been made by

Jews for a long time. He reports that in 1948 the American Jewish

Committee was urging Congress to believe that "Americanism is the

spirit behind the welcome that America has traditionally extended to

people of all races, all religions, all nationalities." Of course,

there had never been such a tradition. In 1952, the American Jewish

Congress argued in hearings on immigration that "our national

experience has confirmed beyond a doubt that our very strength lies in

the diversity of our peoples." This, too, was at a time when U.S.

immigration law was still explicitly designed to maintain a white

majority.

It is often said that when the old immigration policy was scrapped in

1965, scarcely anyone knew, and no one predicted, that the new law

would change the racial makeup of the country. Prof. MacDonald

disputes this, arguing that this had been the objective of Jewish

groups from the beginning.

Prof. MacDonald finds that Jews have been the foremost advocates of

immigration in England, France, and Canada, and that Jewish groups

were the most vocal opponents of independence for Quebec. Australian

Jews led the effort to dismantle the "white Australia" policy, one

reason for which was cited in an editorial in the Australian Jewish

Democrat: "The strengthening of multi-cultural or diverse Australia is

also our most effective insurance policy against anti-Semitism. The

day Australia has a Chinese Australian Governor General I would feel

more confident of my freedom to live as a Jewish Australian." Like

Earl Raab writing about the United States, this Australian Jew is

prepared to sacrifice the traditional culture, people, and identity of

Australia to specifically Jewish interests. It would not be surprising

if such an openly expressed objective did not have the opposite effect

from the intended, and increase anti-Jewish sentiment.[..]

www.davidduke.com