Before President Trump took office, Democratic party congress members were already engaging in talks to impeach the now incumbent President Trump. Their longstanding history of attacking the President at every turn has proven to be an assault on our democracy. It is an assault to our democracy because it is negating the power of “We the People” to have legitimately and officially elected a leader to office based on the American People’s desire to have a strong formidable and capable President in the most powerful office in the world. Furthermore, the Democratic party’s motivation to impeach President Trump does not stem from their official responsibilities as lawmakers, but instead from personal disdain towards the President and the opposing party. This has been made apparent by their rhetorical history of attacking President Trump and his administration, since before he took office. Just look at the media and Hollywood, as this will give you an idea of their hatred.

If the law takes into account a criminal’s history, with criminal “history” being a factor in deciding reasonable punishment for a criminal, then this substantiates that the “history” of any subject matter is relevant in determining current decisions, actions, and events. To that end, we must consider the history of how the Democrats had regarded President Trump, starting before he took office. Here are a few:

1. Talks of impeachment preceded President Trump taking office.

2. Al Green and Brad Sherman started formal efforts of impeachment soon after Trump took office.

3. Alleged Russia collusion investigation. (Dispelled)

4. Allegations that President Trump obstructed justice. (Based on Opinion)

5. Refusing to work with the President on national matters, i.e., healthcare, border security, the courts trying to overturn the travel ban and immigration policies to name a few.

6. Supporting those who have alleged that Trump and his appointees have sexually harassed or conducted sexual misconduct towards women.

7. The constant threat of impeachment.

While these issues listed are not exhaustive of all of the allegations, investigations, and attacks on the President, they stand as some of the more notable efforts by the Democrats to hinder the current administration from doing what “We The People” have elected the President to do. It must be noted that all attempts of the Democrats have been thwarted because they were based not on fact, but instead on hatred and opinion from faceless hope and rumors that the President has done something that will lead to an impeachment. You cannot impeach a President because you do not like him.

Regarding the current impeachment proceedings based on the Ukrainian phone call, this is another faceless attempt to impeach the President.

What are the Democrats accusing President Trump of?

1. Quid Pro Quo.

2. Using his political office for personal gain.

3. Not adhering to the law.

Before diving into those allegations that are based on the phone call Transcripts, I want to point out that at the bottom of the Transcript on the first page, there is a warning that reads;

“CAUTION: A Memorandum of a Telephone Conversation (TELCON) is not a verbatim transcript of a discussion. The text in this document records the notes and recollections of Situation Room Duty Officers and NSC policy staff assigned to listen and memorialize the conversation in written form as the conversation takes place. A number of factors can affect the accuracy of the record, including poor telecommunications connection and variations in accent or interpretation. The word “inaudible” is used to indicate portions of a conversation that the notetaker was unable to hear.”

Please pay attention to what I am about to say. I have a Master’s in Cybersecurity and some years of experience in law enforcement and prior military service. The warning expressed in the transcript by the National Security Council (NSC), written above, sheds doubt on the accuracy of the conversation. As a cybersecurity professional, I can attest to how easily data is manipulated. We see this all of the time with fabricated news reports. While I do not doubt certain elements of the conversation, this conversation reads very fluidly and has probably undergone several revisions. With that said, data may or may not have been added to the dictation. Please see the article written by the Washington Post. This is very important. Link Below:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2019/09/25/transcripts-presidential-calls-are-nearly-verbatim-not-exact-heres-how-it-works/

Setting aside the warning and how the dictation process works, you must read the released transcript itself to understand further why the current impeachment attempt on President Trump, is nothing more than another effort to remove him from office. Please see the link for the transcript below:

https://www.scribd.com/document/427409665/Ukraine-Call-Transcript#fullscreen&from_embed

In the Transcript, Trump reminds the newly elected President of Ukraine, that America has done a lot for Ukraine. Historically speaking, this is not uncommon for Trump to remind everyone of what America has done for them. Trump always bolsters America’s contribution to the world front, and this is very admirable of the President. He is not afraid nor timid to praise America. In the transcript when President Trump reiterates this to the new Ukrainian President, it has a psychological element to reinforce to the new Ukrainian President, that America’s bilateral relationship with Ukraine has been one for which the US has stood behind Ukraine above all other Ukrainian allies. It is a power move to establish and confirm the relationship between two entities. With that said, at no time in the transcript is there an element of Quid Pro Quo or “This for That.” President Trump was establishing our current bilateral relationship with Ukraine. However, it really isn’t a bilateral relationship as Ukraine does not do for us, what we do for them and President Trump points that out as does he for other nations as well.

We must also be reminded that the constitution gives the president broad powers regarding foreign policy. One of President Trump's historical concerns in dealing with foreign policy is the corruption in foreign governments/countries and that other countries that are supposed to be contributing in aid are not doing their part. This also has been a rhetorical and historical concern in President Trump's administration.

While the Democrats are claiming that Trump asked the Ukrainian President to investigate Joe Biden, if you read the transcripts, you will quickly see that Trump asked the New Ukrainian President to look into corruption concerning many issues that may impact foreign relations between the US and Ukraine. Ending corruption in Ukraine is a campaign promise that the new Ukrainian President ran on. President Trump was capitalizing on this promise to ensure that American aid would not be abused. This leads me to the next inquiry on the part of President Trump's request for credible investigations into the Biden family and the abuse of foreign aid to Ukraine.

One of the issues that President Trump asked the Ukrainian President to investigate included Joe Biden’s son and Joe Biden using his political position, for personal gain in getting his son hired onto a prominent energy company in Ukraine. Hunter Biden was reported to have made $50,000 to $83,000 USD per month, as a board member with the Ukrainian energy company. Let me paint this picture clearer, Ukraine, while not impoverished, the average person only makes about $400.00 USD per month. If the US was giving aid to Ukraine, $1.5 Billion to date since 2014 and yet the average person in Ukraine only makes $400 per month, then how could the son of the former Vice President Joe Biden, get paid such an exorbitant salary. It seems that some of the aid we gave to Ukraine, may have been a kickback to Biden’s son. It is well within the rights of the President to inquire about this matter as he again has broad powers where foreign policy is concerned.

Later when one of Ukraine’s top prosecutors sought to investigate and bring charges against Hunter Biden for alleged corruption, Joe Biden stopped the prosecution. Joe Biden, having had a prominent role in the Obama administration in influencing the US / Ukraine relationship, was alleged to have used his influence in getting the prosecutor fired for investigating Hunter Biden. If this is true, Joe Biden obstructed justice through foreign policy and used his position for personal gain on several occasions. 1. Getting his son a prominent paying position in a foreign organization, by use of his political powers 2., obstructing Justice and 3., affecting foreign policy for personal gain. Furthermore, it may very well be exposed that the foreign aid, through corruption, provided the kickback to Hunter Biden on behalf of the work that Joe Biden was doing in Ukraine.

So, why was Joe Biden able to use his office to stop the prosecution of his son? What is being covered up? Why is it okay for the democrats to get away with gross misuse of power and cover it up, but our elected President cannot inquire about this matter? Why were the democrats able to launch the Russian collusion investigating without facts, while the president is again, threatened with impeachment by wanting open an official investigation into the Biden family, based on events that did happen. Moreover, Trump’s inquiry into the matter with the assistance of the Ukrainian President is official because Trump is enlisting the help of Rudy Guiliani and William Barr.

However, Democrats are saying by Trump asking for this investigation, that our foreign aid is contingent upon Ukraine’s President assisting in this matter. That is why they are calling it Quid Pro Quo. Furthermore, Democrats are saying it is an abuse of the President’s power because it is for personal gain since Joe Biden is running for office and he is a contender for the presidency. The fact is, we have been sending aid to Ukraine, though it was recently held back in May of 2019, pending other nations stepping up and doing their part as well to assist Ukraine.

The problem I see here though is that Joe Biden is one of 19 Democratic candidates currently running for office. If Joe Biden were the only Democratic candidate, then I could see the Democrats claim, that this is politically motivated for personal gain on the part of President Trump as being plausible, to affect the elections. However, Senator Warren just surpassed Biden, and Senator Sanders is hot on her heels. There is also the question of the other candidates.

In closing, please do your research and if you arrive at a similar conclusion that I arrived at, please sign the petition to support our duly elected President and stop the current erroneous impeachment inquiry. Sign the petition to start impeachment inquiries against the same handful of democratic lawmakers that are using their powers out of personal hatred to remove a president that has done nothing of what he has been accused of. This will assure our democracy when “We the People” take control of our government. Finally, sign this petition to investigate Hunter Biden and Joe Biden for their corruption.

The Lawmakers that need to be removed from office are:

Nancy Pelosi

Chuck Schumer

Elizabeth Warren

Al Greene

Brad Sherman

Alexandria Ocasio Cortez

Maxine Waters

Ilhan Omar

Rashida Tlaib

Ayanna Pressley

Jerrold Nadler

Kamala Harris

Adam Schiff

Additional Links:

U.S. - Ukraine treaty for cooperating on criminal matters. https://www.congress.gov/106/cdoc/tdoc16/CDOC-106tdoc16.pdf

Joe Biden admitting to withholding money from Ukraine unless the prosecutor investigating his son is fired.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/09/27/flashback_2018_joe_biden_brags_at_cfr_meeting_about_withholding_aid_to_ukraine_to_force_firing_of_prosecutor.html



