Quoted By:

>really vague bullshit

>it has to be something that you can objectively say has been completed

>women should have autonomy over their own bodies and sexualities

>women can't be complicit with male sexuality in its current form

you're just proving how little insight you have into a topic and yet you try to continue it like you know what you're talking about. it is easy and you can even search this yourself if you had any intellectual integrityyeah so is 'make society better' but here you have different groups wanting to follow different means of how to achieve that. and that doesn't make the concept bullshit if you deem it vague for whatever personal reason. you'll have to do better than thatwhat, why?classic liberal feminists wanted the same access to education and property ownership as men. this was achievedmarxist feminists think that this is being complicit with a system that is built on the exploitation of others. obviously their answer is not going to be 'owning property'to use OP's example even though it isn't 'achieved' is ending objectification:also gay marriage was as simple as changing a single law. some lgbt activists don't even like the institution of marriage and would want it abolishednot being unified is a sign of refining points, not being 'retards' because they unquestioningly agree on something, but are constantly re-evaluating