The hallmark of the Trump administration is its quest to put exactly the wrong people in charge of agencies and policies. But his designation of Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) as his point man on healthcare goes well over the line into self-parody.

Put simply, one could not find a worse figurehead for a push on improving healthcare than Rick Scott. As Florida’s governor, he presided over an epic decline in the state’s insurance coverage rate. He refused to accept Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act, depriving 1.4 million residents of coverage they would have received with the change.

Scott presents himself as a healthcare expert. He boasts: “I ran one of the largest healthcare companies in the world.”

That company is Columbia/HCA, which Scott ran until 1997. He left just months after the federal government announced a sprawling investigation into whether the company had systematically defrauded Medicare, Medicaid and other government healthcare programs.


They are going to come up with something really spectacular. Trump introduces his healthcare strike force

That investigation concluded with what the Justice Department called the “largest government fraud settlement in U.S. history.” Columbia/HCA and several subsidiaries ultimately pleaded guilty to 14 criminal counts. The company paid $840 million in fines and penalties. The government tacked on an additional $881 million in penalties in 2003, bringing the total to more than $1.7 billion, which the Justice Department said was “by far the largest recovery ever reached by the government in a health care fraud investigation.”

This is the guy Trump says will make the Republican Party “the party of healthcare.” In naming Scott, along with Sens. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) and Bill Cassidy (R-La.) as his flying wedge on the topic, Trump promised, “They are going to come up with something really spectacular.”

Trump made his remarks in an effort to tamp down outrage over his decision to call for the federal courts to overturn the Affordable Care Act as unconstitutional. That policy decision emerged last week, when Trump’s Justice Department said it would not defend any part of the ACA from a Republican challenge in federal court.


Trump’s fecklessness about healthcare policy has been on full display since his move to undermine the ACA in court last week. On Monday, apparently after hearing from congressional Republicans that they were loath to relitigate an issue for the 2020 elections on which they got creamed in 2018, Trump backed down — a bit. He tweeted that Republicans “are developing a really great HealthCare Plan” but that it wouldn’t be voted on until after 2020. He said nothing about reversing his decision to support the right-wing attack on the ACA in federal court, however.

In any event, the GOP hasn’t managed to come up with a credible replacement for the ACA in the nine years during which it has tried to repeal the law.

Trump’s latest tweets added more confusion to the role he expects Scott and his two confederates to play. But since they’re the designated front men, it’s proper to look at their records on healthcare.

During Scott’s eight years as Florida’s governor, ending this year, Florida remained one of the sickest states in the union. Its uninsured rate among adults age 18-64 rose to 20.1% in 2017. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, that was the third-worst rate in the U.S.


The Commonwealth Fund, a healthcare think tank, ranked Florida third worst in overall health metrics (48th out of the 50 states and District of Columbia). The state ranked 49th in measures of access and affordability of healthcare, prevention and treatment, avoidable hospital use and cost, and disparity in care between high- and low-income residents.

One major reason for this record is Scott’s refusal to expand Medicaid. He even rejected a 2015 proposal that would have covered 800,000 Floridians, albeit with the imposition of work requirements and co-pays.

Rick Scott’s healthcare record, in a nutshell: Florida ranks third from last in its uninsured rate. (CDC)

Notwithstanding Scott’s “expertise,” he mumbled and fumbled under questioning Sunday by Margaret Brennan on CBS’ “Face the Nation.” He seemed to be under the impression that Trump would propose a healthcare plan, though Trump dumped the matter in his lap. Amazingly, he repeated, “I ran a large hospital company,” even though the company was guilty of fraud.


Asked if a Republican alternative would “guarantee access to maternity care or care for newborn children? Mental health? Some of the things that are guaranteed in Obamacare,” he dodged the question with a bland, “Well, of course.”

Would it, though? One of the last GOP proposals for an ACA replacement was offered in 2017 by Cassidy, now Scott’s partner in cooking up an alternative. That proposal would have cost untold millions of Americans their health coverage, according to the Congressional Budget Office. It would have weakened protections for people with preexisting conditions by giving states the authority to allow insurers to charge those customers higher premiums.

As for Barrasso, a colorless member of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s team, he voted at least twice against expanding health coverage for children, and backed former House Speaker Paul D. Ryan’s budget proposal that would have undermined Medicare.

Ladies and gentlemen, your Republican healthcare team. Do you expect them to come up with “something really spectacular” as Trump promised? To ask the question is to answer it.


Keep up to date with Michael Hiltzik. Follow @hiltzikm on Twitter, see his Facebook page, or email michael.hiltzik@latimes.com.

Return to Michael Hiltzik’s blog.