President Trump Donald John TrumpUS reimposes UN sanctions on Iran amid increasing tensions Jeff Flake: Republicans 'should hold the same position' on SCOTUS vacancy as 2016 Trump supporters chant 'Fill that seat' at North Carolina rally MORE late Monday suggested Supreme Court Justices Sonia Sotomayor Sonia SotomayorREAD: Supreme Court justices mourn death of Ginsburg, 'an American hero' READ: Supreme Court justices offer tributes to Ruth Bader Ginsburg Democrats, advocates seethe over Florida voting rights ruling MORE and Ruth Bader Ginsburg Ruth Bader GinsburgJeff Flake: Republicans 'should hold the same position' on SCOTUS vacancy as 2016 Trump supporters chant 'Fill that seat' at North Carolina rally Momentum growing among Republicans for Supreme Court vote before Election Day MORE should recuse themselves from cases involving him or his administration after Sotomayor criticized the White House and some of her fellow justices for repeatedly ruling in favor of the president.

"This is a terrible thing to say," Trump tweeted from India moments before he departed for a welcome ceremony with Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

"Trying to 'shame' some into voting her way? She never criticized Justice Ginsberg when she called me a 'faker,' " he continued, initially misspelling the justice's last name. "Both should recuse themselves on all Trump, or Trump related, matters! While 'elections have consequences', I only ask for fairness, especially when it comes to decisions made by the United States Supreme Court!"

ADVERTISEMENT

The president's tweet indicated he was reacting to coverage of Sotomayor's comments on Fox News.

....on all Trump, or Trump related, matters! While “elections have consequences”, I only ask for fairness, especially when it comes to decisions made by the United States Supreme Court! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 25, 2020

It's unclear how removing two Democratic-appointed judges in certain cases would increase fairness on the court.

Sotomayor, who was appointed by then-President Obama in 2009 and confirmed by the Senate, wrote a dissenting opinion last week after the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 to clear the way for the Trump administration's "public charge" rule to go into effect.

Sotomayor described a "now-familiar pattern" in which the Trump administration "seeks emergency relief from this Court, asking it to grant a stay where two lower courts have not. The Government insists—even though review in a court of appeals is imminent—that it will suffer irreparable harm if this Court does not grant a stay. And the Court yields.”

ADVERTISEMENT

She appeared to explicitly call out the conservative-leaning judges on the bench, writing that "the Court's recent behavior" has benefited "one litigant over all others."

Trump at a news conference in India Tuesday morning doubled down on his remarks, insisting that he felt Sotomayor's written opinion was "so inappropriate" without elaborating on why he thought so.

He added that he felt Ginsburg was biased dating back to his 2016 campaign, when she referred to him as "a faker" who "says whatever comes into his head at the moment."

"I just don't know how they cannot recuse themselves," Trump said.

Of the high court's nine justices, five were appointed by Republican presidents and four were appointed by Democratic presidents. Trump has appointed two: Neil Gorsuch Neil GorsuchREAD: Supreme Court justices mourn death of Ginsburg, 'an American hero' NYT editorial board remembers Ginsburg: She 'will forever have two legacies' Barrett seen as a front-runner for Trump Supreme Court pick MORE and Brett Kavanaugh Brett Michael KavanaughMomentum growing among Republicans for Supreme Court vote before Election Day Remembering Ginsburg's patriotism and lifelong motivation Collins: President elected Nov. 3 should fill Supreme Court vacancy MORE.

ADVERTISEMENT

Trump’s call for two left-leaning justices to recuse themselves also comes as the court is likely to rule in the coming months on the president’s financial records, among other cases.

The court has narrowly sided with Trump on a number of key cases throughout his first term, with the justices divided along ideological lines.

The justices upheld a version of the president’s travel ban, the public charge rule and his ability to use military funds for his long-sought wall along the southern border.

Updated at 9:06 a.m.