Qwerty Uiop

2017-04-04 02:24:43 -0400

Unfortunately, Jack, your debut does not start with you speaking out of this part of you where your reason is located. As a result, your explanation takes The Rebel into the same law quality level reporting where the biased mainstream leftist media have been dwelling for some years now.



First, keep in mind that Trump had publicly lied countless times, and saying that Obama tapped Trump’s phone without any evidence to support that claim can not be anything other than yet another lie. For practical reasons, you don’t need more proof, Jack. If Trump did not lie, he would have provided the evidence in support of his claim. He has not yet, neither has his administration. Your report sounds like a conversion of disbelievers into some understanding for which the underlying facts supposed to have been publicly available, but no one, including Trump himself nor his administration, was able to discover.



You say Evelyn Farkas is “bragging how much Obama staff spied on Trump”, but your clip does not implies it. She said “I’ve been telling my former colleges (…) get as much information/intelligence as you can before Obama leaves administration because I have a fear that somehow that information will disappear” is not an admission of spying. It says nothing about spying! This is before we get to the Trump’s claim that the spying was done by Obama. In other words, even if Farkas explicitly acknowledged that her associates did spy on Trump (which she does not), we would still have not even tackle the Trump’s accusation that Obama supposed to have tapped Trump’s phone.



Think about it: A person who would be as stupid as to “brag”, as you say, on national TV about doing illegal spying on presidency would certainly be not smart enough to convince others to follow her stupidity and commit such illegal acts. If you really think that you have found something others have not been able to find, why don’t you call CIA or NSA and share with them your “discovery”? You see, Trump took his idea of Obama spying on him directly from the Breitbart news whose explanation you are just trying to mimic here.



Then you show the ex deputy director of CIA Mike Morrell saying “this in no way validates the president’s claim that he or his associates at Trump Tower were the target of surveillance by the Obama administration”.



Now, your clip cuts off the previous context and we don’t know what exactly Morrell’s “this” refers to, so I am assuming that it refers to Trump claim that Obama tapped Trump phones. Are you claiming that CIA was unaware of the alleged Obama spying on Trump which you have now so cleverly shown to all the disbelievers to exist? Or maybe Morrell is hiding that he knows what you (and now all Rebel followers) have just discovered? Or maybe you, and now the Rebel followers, know more than does CIA ? Which one is it?



Then you show the headline of The New Your Times article “Wiretapped data used in inquiry of trump aids”. Again, it is not an admission that Obama tapped Trump. Get it?



I don’t want to spend more time on pointing out the numerous discrepancies between your claims and the facts you cite in support of your claims , but I suggest that you get a philosophy 100-level textbook on critical reasoning and become acquainted with some basic argument structures. Good luck.

commented