Fischer is the paradigmatic example of a cultural Marxist. Anyone who disagrees with him is (by definition) a “fascist”. I guess Europe has lots of “fascists”. In his youth, Fischer was a more conventional Marxist beating police officers with iron rods and firebombing people he didn’t like (he was a member of Putzgruppe, literally "cleaning squad", with the first syllable being an acronym for Proletarische Union für Terror und Zerstörung, "Proletarian Union for Terror and Destruction" – Wikipedia).



Rather than torching individual police officers, now he is trying to burn all of Europe down. The people of Europe as a whole, and every European nation have every right to control immigration, no matter how Fischer and his cosmopolitan elitists don’t like it. The issue isn’t “chauvinism” or “nationalism” or “fascism”, but survival. A nation or region that does not defend its borders is dead. Rome fell when it could not control the barbarians at the gates. Europe is failing as we speak, because it is unwilling to stop the current wave of economic migrants (they are not “refugees”).



Europe has a long and unhappy history of mass immigration (even without the Fall of Rome). Just a few years ago, a prominent German, Thilo Sarrazin, wrote a notable book (Deutschland schafft sich ab - "Germany abolishes itself") showing that mass immigration to Germany has failed by any plausible standard. How does a good Marxist like Fischer respond to this? By advocating more immigration.



More recently, the streets of Paris have been repeatedly drenched in blood by failed immigrants and “refugees”. How does Fischer respond to these atrocities? By calling anyone who suggests that restricting immigration might be reasonable a “fascist”.



Of course, the horrors of Joschka Fischer are not limited to Open Borders. Predictably, he is an unrepentant Euro-fanatic. Typical quote “Without the euro, Europe would disappear from the world political stage”. Stated differently, he is utterly willing to sacrifice the people of Europe (who have repeatedly voted against Europe) upon the anti-democratic altar of “ever deeper Europe”, no matter how much the democratic will of Europe opposes it. Like it or not, Fischer is not just a Euro-fanatic, but a Euro-totalitarian.



How does Fischer defend the European horror chamber, he and his friends have built? Predictably he doesn’t. Instead, we have the usual litany of ethnic, racial, and sexual identity politics. His repeated allusions to the “White Man’s World” shows that he is utterly willing to use the politics of race… As long as they are useful to his cause. Fischer is all too willing destroy Europe to advance the ideology of cosmopolitan elite.

