Over at Breitbart:

“I would like to say to women who are thinking about getting married: Would you marry a rapist? If you didn’t know he was a rapist but then you found out he was a rapist would you stay with him?” asked Willey. Willey was sitting next to Juanita Broaddrick, the former nursing home administrator and volunteer for Clinton’s gubernatorial campaign who says that Clinton raped her twice in a hotel room in 1978.

There have been a lot of people showing up at Trump rallies, crying out rapist, but this is not as effective as an amygdala hijack, because it focuses the denigration on Bill, and ignores the people it should be targeting.

One thing which would trigger feminists would be to liken Democrat women supporting the Clintons to the pathetic battered women who keep returning home to their abusers, and evince sympathy for them. Everybody pities those women who are trapped in the cycle of abuse, because it is just assumed they are pathetic and helpless.

In this meme, the Clintons assault, those women come back to them. The Clinton’s rape, those women come home and look for approval. The Clintons smack Bernie around, and his supporters come right back and ask the Clintons for forgiveness. The Clinton’s policies fail, and those women deny it and cling even tighter. The Clinton’s use their office to enrich themselves instead of fulfilling their promises, and back those women come. They are the same thing.

Liberal women have that same pathiety, but they also have the narcissist’s need to deny it at all costs. Pointing to a real analogy which makes them feel any similarity will be enormously painful cognitively. That pain will associate in the amygdala with the Clintons because they are so integral to the idea, and their association with the concept of the abuser is secondary to the analogy between the liberal woman and the abused spouse, which is what the brain will focus on. The idea of the Clintons as an abuser will slip by into the subconscious unexamined.