Former NYPD Boss Ray Kelly's Emails 'Inadvertently' Wiped Despite Court Order To Preserve Them

from the press-'delete'-to-retire dept

No surprises here, although the contempt for government authorities that aren't the NYPD is a bit audacious.

Most of former NYPD Commissioner Raymond Kelly’s emails on his desktop computer were deleted at the end of his tenure despite an order they be preserved for a high-stakes class-action suit alleging a summons quota system within the department.

“The majority of former Commissioner Kelly’s locally stored emails were inadvertently deleted at the conclusion of his tenure,” city attorney Curt Beck wrote to Manhattan Federal Judge Robert Sweet.

The city only recently learned of the mistakenly destroyed data, according to documents filed Wednesday.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community. Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis. While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

The NYPD -- and its top officials -- have never been fans of transparency or accountability. The only shocking aspect is that the deletion was done in direct disobedience of a court order. The plan to secure Kelly's legacy by destroying his emails was likely in place long before his retirement. Back in 2013, it was made clear by Michael Bloomberg that there would be no effort made to archive the mayor's communications. Four government agencies were also on the "assured destruction" list, the NYPD being one of them.By the time Kelly and Bloomberg left office, their emails were already slated for deletion. That makes the following statement both accurate and deceiving."Inadvertently" is just another word for "automatically." Since no one was given the task of ensuring Kelly's emailsbe deleted, the destruction went ahead as planned. But the wording suggests someone just hit the wrong key and nuked Kelly's emails.And, as is far too often the case, those charged withthese communications were the last to know they were gone.It might be more believable if the city's story didn't keep changing. First, it claimed the order to preserve the emails wasn't "disseminated widely," leading to staffers "mistakenly" deleting communications when Kelly left office. A few hours later, the city "clarified" its original statement by claiming the deletion only affected emails "stored locally," which vanished when Kelly was given a new computer in 2013 -- and his old one wiped for reuse.In the latter explanation, the city claimed the only emails affected were those "three years or older" or "." (This auto-delete would seem toundermine the "archive" function, not to mention the definition of the word itself.) The city also said itsearch the inboxes of other NYPD/city officials for copies of Kelly's emails. Neither statement is very reassuring, considering the preservation order took effect inwhen the lawsuit was filed and the city has yet to produce aThe city says this "accidental" deletion is "not a big deal." (Yes, that's a direct quote.) The double standard here is astounding. If the NYPD was pursuing a case against a criminal defendant, the deletion of communications would be usedthe person charged and could result in additional penalties. The federal government -- thanks to law meant to preventfrom destroying evidence -- goes after people for far less overt actions. Sarbanes-Oxley makes the deletion ofa possibly criminal act -- including periodic maintenance like deleting cookies/browser history. The law basically forbids anycriminal defendant from deleting anything from their devices and computers, as evidence must not only be preserved forinvestigations, but also for "" investigationsPublic entities have a duty to preserve communications responsive to public records requests and must implement clearly-stated deletion policies that err on the side of retention. The wiping of emails the moment a controversial official leaves office should be suspect, even without the existence of a preservation order demanding the retention of these documents. The court may pursue sanctions against the city, but that won't help the plaintiffs much -- not if evidence of ticket/arrest quotas (the central issue of the lawsuit) was contained in the "inadvertently" destroyed emails.

Filed Under: deleted, email, evidence, nypd, ray kelly, spoliation