NEW DELHI: Taking strong exception to the campaign on social media seeking his recusal from the SC bench hearing a case on land acquisition law , Justice Arun Mishra said it was an attempt to malign the entire judiciary which cannot be allowed.Justice Mishra, who is heading a Constitution bench to interpret Section 24(2) of the land acquisition law, said it was not about a particular judge but about the institution. "Can the chief justice be compelled to reconstitute the bench? Is it not about maligning the institution? Some people in media are ganging up. I am not saying who is responsible. That issue is also before Justice AK Patnaik," Justice Mishra said while referring to the Justice Patnaik committee which was set up to examine allegations on fixing of benches in SC."It is not about me but about the institution. Put your hands on your heart and ask yourself about it. Today it is about me but tomorrow it may be about others. I am more worried about the institution," Justice Mishra told lawyers appearing in the case. He said the issue could be raised before the bench but it was not proper to spread it on social media.Supporting his views, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said there is a new pattern emerging in media to write articles about a pending case just days before it is to be heard in an attempt to influence the proceedings. "Not many people take social media seriously. But articles are written in newspapers and online portals days before hearing of an important case in court. It is being tweeted and made viral. This is a new pattern emerging. It is intended to influence the proceedings. Majesty of justice may not get influenced by it but the intention is to do that," Mehta said.Senior advocate S Divan, who sought recusal of Justice Mishra, however said the judicial system is robust enough not to be affected and influenced by chatter on social media and the court should not take it seriously.