Quote from: desmond_kof on March 17, 2015, 05:45:53 PM Hey guys here are the results, to avoid ties in the same place, I decided to go by highest amount of wins, with highest amount of games played, so I counted losses too. If I have anything wrong or incorrect, please post up.



1.) Emilkof: 8-0 = 8 games (32 playKOF points)

2.) Moony Blues: 6-4 = 10 games (16 playKOF points)

3.) desmond_kof: 6-3 = 9 games (8 playKOF points)

4.) Aroo: 5-4 = 9 games (4 playKOF points)

5.) KCO Astro: 5-1 = 6 games (2 playKOF points)

5.) buckweet: 3-3 = 6 games (2 playKOF points)

7.) Koko: 3-2 = 5 games (1 playKOF points)



I don't think it makes sense that Moony is ahead of you at 6-4, when you went 6-3. Why should having more games played be a deciding factor if you're tied on wins? I would have ranked it:



1.) Emilkof: 8-0 = 8 games

2.) desmond_kof: 6-3 = 9 games

3.) Moony Blues: 6-4 = 10 games

4.) KCO Astro: 5-1 = 6 games

5.) Aroo: 5-4 = 9 games

6.) Koko: 3-2 = 5 games

7.) buckweet: 3-3 = 6 games



you're also missing the 8th person.





I feel like he's encouraging just playing more than winning as weird as that sounds. It seems like the best chance to rank high is to play as much as possible in the given time frame, not necessarily having a good win percentage since going 3-8 would beat going 3-0 here from what I can tell.



It doesn't make sense from any kind of actual rankings system, but if playing games is the goal, that may be his ideology.



Sucks for me since I usually can't dedicate the full 4 hours to consistently play. At best I can only stay long enough to play 4-6 matches but it doesn't bother me that much since I'm not playing for anything anyway. I dun even know what playKOF points are xP



I'm encouraging more of both high amount of wins, as well as most amount of games played next to players. It wouldn't be fair for me to rank people just based on wins if they tied if they didn't play as many games as another person. I feel that if you have put the time in to stick around and play as many people as you can (along with rematches) you should place higher than someone that has had the same amount of wins you have. So yes, I'm encouraging more of participation in the event rather than just a good score. It will avoid people from just hanging around and not participating as much as they should, which is the main reason I hold these events. It's for people to just PLAY; all the placings and points, ranks are just for an individuals own record keeping of how much they feel they are progressing or participating.I am missing the 8th person because I'm using the column from the Local Round Robin (that is for players under 8) for online events: http://dreamcancel.com/journey-to-dream-cancel-cup/ I can add an 8th player just for the online events.I decided upon using a ranking system because we are doing a circuit project called Journey To Dream Cancel Cup which is basically like Capcom Pro Tour but with a much smaller (and grassroots) scale. The rankings don't attribute to person's actual skill compared to others they just signify how much a person has played by either playing games online, doing local tournaments, or traveling. So if you play more and do more activities then you may rank high. The points earned in the circuit are called playKOF points: http://dreamcancel.com/journey-to-dream-cancel-cup/