and the face of the Bernie campaign. She has made herself a spokesman for them. Clearly she makes possible the millions if not billions in profits.



You, however, see generating profits as fine but have a problem when the company donates to charitable organizations. That suggests some pretty odd priorities.



I don't even know who the fuck Demi Lavato is, other than her name appears in tabloids. The Clinton campaign certainly doesn't put her out there as a major spokeswoman, or insist she is to be believed over a civil rights icon like Dolores Huerta. You all made clear that you stand with Sarandon and her ilk above Dolores Huerta, who has risked her life for poor people. That reflects on you. Bernie and the rest of who have touted Sarandon to accuse women of voting with our "vaginas" (because any failure to vote for men and only men can only be the result of gynecological/genetic deviance), who accused a civil rights icon of lying by insisting that what mattered was "chanting" rather than denying Spanish translation. You all chose Sarandon as the face of your movement. You get to live with that fallout.



No one here is touting Podesta or Demi Lavato as superior to civil rights leaders, whether Ben Jealous, or anyone. That's not what we do. We don't pretend to be fighting a battle for the people while relying on 1 percenter after another to attack those same people, insisting any demographic group that doesn't vote how we demand is either too stupid or antisemetic to vote as we tell them.



You all chose to highlight and promote Sarandon to make a case for Bernie. You now own what comes with it.