Mosaisk

January 1, 2014

To analyze the Jewish influence in Sweden is a delicate matter, much due to the fact that the influence in many regards is indirect.

For instance, a couple of years ago (in 1997) a Jewish historian named Stéphane Bruchfeld made an investigation asking Swedish students questions about the Holocaust.

The result of the investigation showed that one third of the student questioned the official version of the Holocaust, something that outraged the media who blamed the Swedish educational system for this.

The government responded by making a decision that 700.000 copies of a book about the Holocaust should be distributed to all students in the country and be sent to manyl households.

The author appointed for writing the book? You might remember his name: Stéphane Bruchfeld. The best part is that after the decision was made, someone noticed that Bruchfeld “accidentally” had misinterpreted the figures of his investigation. Actually very few students questioned the official version of the Holocaust.

Well, Bruchfeld was not very sorry, he had already been appointed to write the book which then was distributed as planned. As a consequence several schools arranged annual theme days with discussions about how Jews have been persecuted and history in school nowadays focus more on the Holocaust than on the Second World War at large.

The actions of Bruchfeld may have been direct, but many of the consequences were indirect. There was no official demand for theme days or more focus on the Holocaust in education, still as this was a direct result of Bruchfeld’s doings and how young Swedes nowadays are learning about the “unique” suffering of Jews during the Second World War is an example of the indirect Jewish influence in our country.

Bruchfeld is by the way engaged in Svenska Kommittén mot Antisemitism (SKMA; the Swedish Committee against Anti-Semitism), a lobbying organization that also “educates” schoolteachers, students and journalists about anti-Semitism, which in practice mean that all criticism of Jews is hate and should be extinguished.

Earlier this week SKMA arranged a two-day seminar called “From prejudice to genocide” and had invited leading journalists from all major media. The two main themes of the seminar were that criticism of Israel in media should be equated with anti-Semitism, which in the end could, or most likely would, end with genocide, and that anti-Semitism among Muslims and Arabs in Sweden is widespread but denied by the anti-Semitic media in Sweden.

Well, of course the anti-Semitic media ruled by the Bonnier family, Peter Hjörne (Kaplan) and Helle Klein responded by denouncing the evil Muslims and Arabs in Sweden that do have the nerve to criticize Jews or the altruistic state of Israel.

I have read the 50 page report released by SKMA during the seminar; The Denied Hatred – Anti-Semitism among Arabs and Muslims in Sweden. I wish I had the time to translate it for you, and I guess you wished you had the time to then actually read it. It expresses some extremely subjective perspectives and exemplifies the particularistic view that so many Jews hold.

The official author of the report, the Gentile Mikael Tossavainen, equates all anti-Semitism with Jew-hate. This is very important when analyzing what he later on refers to as anti-Semitic. For instance, the report claims that the view that Jews somehow could ever contribute to-, or cause an anti-Semitic reaction is in itself anti-Semitism made manifest.

Further, the policies or acts of Israel has nothing at all to do with the reason Arabs or Muslims may dislike Jews, according to the report. All Arabs or Muslims who may dislike or criticize Jews have hated Jews all along anyway. Another amazing suggestion is that anything critical about Judaism as a religion is anti-Semitic. To claim that Jews, according to the Jewish religion, are considered to better then “the nations of the world” or that that there would be anything immoral in the Torah, or any glorification of violence is anti-Semitism.

In other words, if you do claim anything of this you are an anti-Semite and per definition do hate Jews. Great objective scholarship don’t you think? The report also considers Palestinian school-books anti-Semitic since they refer to Israel as the “1948-country”, calls suicide-bombers martyrs, and do not mention the Oslo-accord.

Well, well, what might one add to this discussion regarding Israeli school-books? Then, of course, there is no term for Jewish hatred of Gentiles. Racism? No, Judaism is perfect, remember, anything critical to Jewish behavior or Judaism is anti-Semitism and anti-Semitism is Jew-hatred.

This is the paradigm of Jewish apology, the extremely subjective and contradictory Jewish apology. The logic is that all Gentiles criticizing Jews do so, always, without any real reason except for an irrational, pathologic hatred. These anti-Semitic Gentiles further blame Jews for all the bad things happening to them in the world.

Well, what if we apply that logic to Jews, what do we have? Jews are constantly blaming Gentiles for being anti-Semitic whenever they are having any problems. All the Jew’s problems are caused by anti-Semites; at least that is what we are told. The same logic, which Jews claim that anti-Semites are following, is followed by them, themselves, when they express that very claim. Well, I guess we will continue discussing this topic further on in the future.