Quebec's secularism law, which bans some civil servants from wearing religious symbols at work, is facing a new legal challenge.

Lawyers representing a multi-faith group filed a motion Thursday in Quebec Superior Court that argues the law violates constitutional protections of gender equality and religious freedom.

The motion, a copy of which was provided to CBC News, also argues the law exceeds provincial jurisdiction and fails to live up to its own definition of laicité — or secularism.

"Fundamentally, what the law does is take a rather crude and odious form of discrimination — which is to ban the wearing of religious symbols — and wrap up that ban in the language of human rights," said Eric Mendelsohn, one of the lawyers representing the inter-faith group, Coalition Inclusion Québec.

Montreal teacher Bouchera Chelbi, one of three plaintiffs named in the legal challenge, says Quebec's secularism law specifically targets women, especially Muslim women.

"They can pretend that it's a law about religious symbols. But at the end of the day, we all know that [in] the teaching profession, we are mostly women," Chelbi told As It Happens host Carol Off.

"There are a lot of women wearing hijabs who are getting degrees as teachers. And you don't see that many Jewish people wearing kippahs as teachers. You don't see that many Sikh women or men wearing the turban. Mostly, it's Muslim women."

"So we can't help but feel like we are being targeted by them."

Other challenges in the works

The secularism law, known as Bill 21, is already facing a separate constitutional challenge filed jointly by a Muslim advocacy group and a civil rights organization.

More legal challenges could be in the works. The English Montreal School Board voted this week to mount its own case against Bill 21 on the grounds that it violates minority language rights protected by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

View photos Ryan Remiorz/The Canadian Press More

Several polls taken after the law was passed in June suggest it is popular among francophone Quebecers. But its effects on Muslim women are only now becoming clear.

Under the law, any civil servant in a position of authority, including public school teachers, government lawyers and police officers, cannot wear religious symbols at work. (A grandfather clause protects teachers hired before March 27, 2019.)

Since the start of the school year, several cases have come to light of women being turned away from teaching positions when they refused to remove their hijab. Others report dropping out of teacher education programs, while some teachers have opted to remove their headscarves in order to keep their jobs.

Gender equality protections invoked

The motion points to such cases, arguing the consequences of Bill 21 are felt mainly by Muslim women and so run contrary to Section 28 of the Charter, which guarantees gender equality.

Premier François Legault's government has, in the past, rejected claims that the law is unfair to women by saying it doesn't single out any particular religion or gender.

"Those arguments just don't fly in Canadian constitutional law," said Mendelsohn. "Those considerations are essentially irrelevant."

Though the Quebec government invoked the notwithstanding clause to shield the law from claims it violates basic Charter rights, Section 28 isn't subject to the clause.

Story continues