Homeowners impacted by a catastrophic water main break near Northeast Alberta Street in March say the city of Portland on Monday denied their claims for damage to their property.

PORTLAND, Ore. — Homeowners impacted by a catastrophic water main break in March say the city of Portland denied their claims for damage to their property on Monday.

Claims for alternate living expenses and business interruption were also denied. A total of 11 claims were filed and then denied, according to a city spokeswoman.

For several weeks, home and business owners were anxiously awaiting a response from the city regarding their tort claims, but they were hoping for a different answer.

The massive break on the 30-inch cast-iron water main happened about two months ago in Northeast Portland. It sent a geyser shooting up into the air, and millions of gallons of water rushing down the streets.

The hole in the road on Northeast Skidmore Street is patched up and the water main repaired. But people whose homes flooded are still dealing with the aftermath.

"From sidewalk to sidewalk it was underwater, so it was like a river just flowing down the street," one homeowner AJ Kleffner said.

Kleffner had about 3 feet of water in his garage and basement caused by the ruptured 104-year-old pipe.

"It was a total disaster and here we are, seven weeks later, and we're looking at the same thing," he said.

Kleffner spent thousands out-of-pocket on restoration and remediation so far; crews ripped out dry wall, insulation, carpet and flooring to prevent mold.

"At this point we’re like $12,000 out of pocket and that’s just to get things stabilized. But to put it back to the way it was before, we’re looking at over $50,000, and that’s on us. If the city is not going to step up and take responsibility for this, that’s on us,” Kleffner told KGW. "And as a homeowner how do you just come up with 50 grand to just restore your home back to the way it was?"

Just around the block from Kleffner, Ryan Humphrey had to do the same.

Since Day 1, it’s been on him, his family and his neighbors to mitigate the situation. He also brought in a restoration crew to prevent mold from building up.

Along with losing many irreplaceable, precious family heirlooms and other belongings, Humphrey says he’s out about $20,000 already. While waiting for the city's response, he had to pay for restoration and a new furnace. He modestly expects to cough up around $60,000 to 70,000 to fix everything.

"At this point if the city is walking away from us, then we have a lot of things, like do we replace things that our kids had?" Humphrey said. "I feel as a homeowner, I'm taking the burden or taking the brunt of an aging infrastructure we can't even manage anymore."

Humphrey says no one from the city, other than the fire department, has actually stepped foot on his property to assess the damage.

"I feel like it was an all-hands-on-deck matter initially and now it's just out of sight, out of mind. Well this isn't out of sight and out of mind to me," Kleffner said as he showed KGW his torn-apart basement.

Kleffner and Humphrey say their insurance companies wouldn't cover any of the damage. Insurance considers the event a flood because it was surface water that inundated their homes, and people in the neighborhood don't have flood insurance because they don't live in a flood plain.

Both filed claims with the city right away, seeking compensation for damage. But both found out Monday they were denied.

"I look at it from the standpoint of magnitude and duration," Humphrey said.

Portland Water Bureau Public Information Officer Jaymee Cuti said 12 valves were involved in this particular main break. Cuti says the water was reduced to a manageable level to start repairs around 5 p.m. and within 38 hours, the pipe was repaired.

Ultimately, homeowners feel the city of Portland is at fault for the faulty, old pipe.

The city said it investigates claims on a case-by-case basis. To pay out, they must find the city was at all negligent.

In the city's denial letter, the homeowners provided us, the city wrote it was a spontaneous water main break. The letter says the ruptured part had no documented maintenance issues and the remainder of the main was in "good condition." The city said it wasn't negligent, so it's not liable.

In an e-mail to KGW before the denial letters were sent Monday afternoon, City of Portland Office and Management and Finance Public Information Officer Heather Hafer said the claims process takes a substantial amount of time.

"Our website states that it takes approximately 45 days to gather all necessary information, but then additional time may be needed to review and make a determination. And oftentimes there is additional fact-finding work that needs to be done. We hope to be able to provide responses to claimants very soon," Hafer said.

"I don’t understand how there’d be any perspective that would think the city is not at fault for this when this is infrastructure they maintain. Where do our tax dollars go?" Kleffner said. "Our aging infrastructure, it needs to be addressed. This isn’t OK for citizens to have to pay tens of thousands of dollars just to put their home back together."

Kleffner and Humphrey are left footing the bill themselves, but both say this isn’t the last the city will hear from them. Taking the next step, they say, is going to hurt and they’ll likely have to do some of the reparation work themselves to stay economical.