Skip to comments.

[Vanity] Electoral College count, and Hillary

self | myself

Posted on by adorno

Should Hillary put a stop to the "Electoral College Stupidity"?



TOPICS:

Politics/Elections

Your Opinion/Questions

KEYWORDS:

electoralcollege

hillary2016

hillaryclinton

politics

vanity

Well, as we all know, Hillary lost the election, and Trump won. Trump won via the electoral college count, which is how the constitution mandated. Hillary lost, but won the popular vote count. We know that there are a lot of people, including politicians and regular folks, asking for the electors to vote against the winner by casting "their vote" for somebody other than Trump. We know that there won't be enough electors voting against Trump to make a difference, and Trump will still win with the majority, but, the question is... Where is Hillary Clinton's integrity and character and decency? She knows that she lost, fair and square, and she knows that those seeking to get electors to switch their votes are just angry and in denial and shocked, so... The real question is, why hasn't Hillary stepped up to ask those people to, pleas stop it. She should let them know that she understands how they feel, but that what their doing is fruitless and illegal and unbecoming to the system as it was established by our founders. Hillary needs to step up and do the right thing, even if it's just this one time.



To: adorno

"Where is Hillary Clinton's integrity and character and decency?"



Are you joking? .



To: adorno

Hillary lost, but won the popular vote count. That has yet to be confirmed. There are millions of absentee ballots that not have been counted. Absentee ballots are only counted if the margin of victory is less than the number of absentee ballots sent in. It stands to reason that Trump will have more absentee votes than Hitlery.



by 3 posted onby Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)

To: bobk3

"Where is Hillary Clinton's integrity and character and decency?" Probly where she keeps her slinky black dress.



by 4 posted onby Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)

To: adorno

You mean, when she gets out of rehab?



by 5 posted onby BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)

To: Texas Eagle

There are millions of absentee ballots that not have been counted.



I know that, and that's not the issue I'm addressing.



To: Texas Eagle

Also, the illegal votes, by both non citizens and the usual DNC criminal conspiracy of dead voters, multiple voters and old fashioned ballot box stuffing. I doubt the DNC has a legit win in any election for 3 decades now.



by 7 posted onby Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)

To: Texas Eagle

It stands to reason that Trump will have more absentee votes than Hitler. Whatever logic there might be with this reasoning gets obliterated by the 4.3 million mail-in/provisional ballots in CA and 700K in WA yet to be counted.



To: bobk3

Are you joking? .



You're right in presenting the question, but, like I said in the body of my comments, she could do the right thing, even if it's just this one time.



To: Texas Eagle

Simple question — how many of Hillary’s votes are fraudulent. 10 percent, at least? Ideas, anyone? Considering the sheer joy the RAT party puts into stuffing ballot boxes, and busing lowlifes to multiple precincts, how can we trust any vote count? I should think Nevada, Colorado, Virginia, New Hampshire, and Minnesota — anywhere Hitlery won by a close margin — would flip to Trump if we had an honest election.



To: BenLurkin; adorno

She’s passed out in an alley somewhere, with pigeons sitting on her head.



by 11 posted onby NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)

To: Texas Eagle

Absentee ballots are only counted if the margin of victory is less than the number of absentee ballots sent in. Source please



To: adorno; All

“Where is Hillary Clinton’s integrity and character and decency?”

I think she lost those things when she was about 17. At least, I have not seen any evidence of them in what I have read of her adult life.



To: adorno

I know that, and that's not the issue I'm addressing. I realize that. I'm not trying to hijack the thread. I just thought I'd point it out. Nothing personal.



by 14 posted onby Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)

To: adorno

Hillary and integrity should NEVER be used in the same sentence.



To: marktwain

I think she lost those things when she was about 17



Like I said, she could probably do the right thing this time, even if it's just once. She is done, doesn't have much to lose, politically.



To: Grimmy

Zackly. Multiple voters, dead voters and mail-in ballots that ended up in a ditch all skew the actual numbers.



by 17 posted onby Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)

To: Nothingburger

In Nevada, yes. Trump only lost by 26,434 votes. Polls were held open in Las Vegas past closing time in early voting. We have an estimated 210,000 illegals in Nevada. Voter turnout was extremely high this year, 76% I believe, versus 45% in 2012. He lost Clark Co by 81,497 votes and Washoe Co by 2503 votes. That tells you how are the rest of us worked to try and overcome the voter fraud.



by 18 posted onby Duchess47 ("One day I will leave this world and dream myself to Reality" Crazy Horse)

To: adorno

HilLIAR did not win the popular vote Her vote totals include millions of voter fraud, illegals, deceased, pets, filled in forms, multiple voters.



by 19 posted onby A_Former_Democrat ("Liberalism is a mental disorder" On FULL Display NOW BOYCOTT PepsiCO)

To: Texas Eagle

There are millions of absentee ballots that not have been counted. Absentee ballots are only counted if the margin of victory is less than the number of absentee ballots sent in. Yeah, that's not really true, at some point, usually within a week, all votes get counted and logged. It's one of those Internet myths going around that some don't get counted. All that info get studied, A LOT, by poll takers and campaign managers to better understand what makes the population tick; so to speak. The loser looks for reasons why they lost through the demographics and numbers of who voted. Now they do go ahead and call a state for one candidate on election day normally unless it's so close they need to count all the ballots like for AZ, NH, and MI this go around.



by 20 posted onby Boomer (New Dem Slogan and Self Mantra: ALATT (All Lies All The Time))

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

FreeRepublic , LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794

FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson