Premier League clubs are pushing for a review into how Video Assistant Referee decisions are communicated to supporters inside the stadiums over fears it could see attendances fall.

At present, VAR incidents will only be displayed to supporters at matches if the referees initial decision has been overturned, leaving many a fan confused as to what has actually occurred, or even if a check is happening. Meanwhile, viewers at home are able to see the checks taking place and, via the commentators, have the discussions between officials relayed.

VAR has overturned 15 decisions in the first eight rounds of the Premier League season and referees have been encouraged to allow the officials at Stockley Park to advise on decisions instead of using the pitchside review screen, which would give fans further indication something was being looked at.

While clubs unanimously voted for the technology to be introduced to the Premier League, and still support the VAR, there are grave concerns over how it is being implemented at stadiums.

"We've had two experiences at the Amex this season of VAR goals being disallowed for us and I should start by saying both of them are correct," said Paul Barber, chief executive and deputy chairman at Brighton. "The way in which they were managed though was quite different.

"Within literally seconds we're getting complaints in the stadium from people that paid £30, £40, £50 or £60 to watch the game, saying, 'Look, I don't know what's going on'.

"I have no idea why that goal is disallowed, I can guess, and I'm trying to work it out. But half the people that guess thought it was a foul on the goalkeeper, the other half thought it was offside. That's not good. "We immediately spoke to the Premier League and wrote to the Premier League and PGMOL (Professional Game Match Officials Board) and said we were supporters of VAR, we're still supporting VAR, but we must absolutely protect the in stadium experience.

"This is the lifeblood of our sport, broadcasters want full stadiums, we want full stadiums. We want those people in the stadiums to be treated fairly. To be treated fairly they must know what is going on and particularly on goals."

Concerns were raised at a recent Premier League shareholders meeting, where PGMOL general manager Mike Riley took on the task of talking delegates through a number of controversial decision and how they were reached.

Further analysis of the use of VAR is being undertaken before Premier League executives convene again during the November international break in order to discuss how best to improve its use, and protect fans in stadiums.

"We're just talking about getting enough games under VAR's belt, so to speak collectively, for them to to work out what's working, what isn't," said Barber. "I don't get the sense from the Premier League meetings that that people are changing their opinion on VAR. I think we're just I think we're just looking for some refinements to make it better. I think communications stadium would would go a long way.

"The the issue of controversial incidents not being shown on screens, well, that's already compromised if VAR, for example, turns over a red card, one way or the other, because you're showing the clip.

"I never quite understood it from a from a point of view of we are a live sport, we're entertainment and the incidents happened. And then not to show the people that the incident how it happened, bit strange, but we are where we are.

"I think making sure that we can show clips making sure we can communicate better. I'm not sure I would go as far as open mic on the referee. I can see the entertainment value but I'm not sure the players or officials would like it. I've got an open mind."

At present two Premier League clubs - Liverpool and Manchester United - do not have big screens and are unable to show replays of VAR incidents.