A man blamed for executing his young child by abandoning him in a hot auto was in charge of the kid's demise yet it was not deliberate, a court has listened.Justin Ross Harris sobbed as his legal advisor contended the disaster in Georgia two years back was because of a change of schedule.Mr Harris overlooked Cooper was in the rearward sitting arrangement of his SUV that morning since he had generally dropped him off at nursery at that point, the court listened.On Monday, the arraignment said the litigant plotted to kill his child.He arranged the catastrophe since he needed to leave the family to proceed with undertakings with other ladies, the court listened.However, the resistance group endeavored to scatter that idea while conceding the passing of the 22-month-old little child was the father's flaw."Ross Harris is in charge of his kid's demise. It's his blame, most likely about it," Maddox Kilgore told the jury in his opening explanation."What you're going to see here at this trial is that being mindful is not the same thing similar to a criminal."Cooper passed on in the wake of being left for seven hours in the vehicle as it was stopped outside his dad's work environment, a Home Terminal office on the edges of Atlanta.Mr Harris told police he had taken his child to breakfast and given him a kiss while placing him into the back of the auto a while later. However, then he headed to work and overlooked he was still in the auto.It was a break of the routine to take him to breakfast - for the most part he ate in the wake of taking his child to nursery.As the occasions that day were connected in court, the litigant spotted his eyes with a tissue.Mr Kilgore said: "His sexual conduct isn't some sort of thought process to kill the individual he cherished more than anybody on the planet."The youngsters abandoned in hot autosUnexpectedly, the litigant was arranging a future with his family and hoping to move to a greater home, the court was told.A video appeared to the court on Tuesday delineates Mr Harris in the quick outcome of the catastrophe, pacing here and there and shouting.One cop offered confirmation to say Mr Harris snapped when police requesting that he quit utilizing his cellular telephone, and whined when bound in the squad car.While the arraignment group contended the proof demonstrated that Mr Harris was unemotional, the guard attorneys said it indicated he was plainly bothered by what had happened.