READER COMMENTS ON

"Sibel Edmonds Toon of the Moment..."

(9 Responses so far...)





COMMENT #1 [Permalink]

... molly said on 2/4/2008 @ 9:59 am PT...





A picture is worth a million words.Someone needs to draw one about all the words and money going into elections and those such as butch and Hoppy are the deciding factors.

COMMENT #2 [Permalink]

... DrYattz said on 2/4/2008 @ 10:25 am PT...





I consider Sibel far, FAR sexier than Britney.

COMMENT #3 [Permalink]

... Ralph said on 2/4/2008 @ 11:46 am PT...





What do you have to do to get some information out to the public, anyway? Put it in the Times of London? Oh, I forgot. That doesn't work either. Guess I might as well check out whether Britney has underwear on. That's so fascinating. I never lose interest in it.

COMMENT #4 [Permalink]

... Dredd said on 2/4/2008 @ 11:51 am PT...





Architects who question the NIST and 911 Commission Reports on technical grounds, are aware that Sibel knows the reports are wrong, and are starting to get some press. The media is showing flesh and anything else they can to cover up the story, and are thereby damaging Britney like they are trying to damage the public.

COMMENT #5 [Permalink]

... Bluebear2 said on 2/4/2008 @ 1:12 pm PT...





The sad sad truth! Ralph #3 ... What do you have to do to get some information out to the public, anyway? Print it on Britney's underwear!

COMMENT #6 [Permalink]

... calipendence said on 2/4/2008 @ 3:57 pm PT...





Perhaps the defense in the upcoming AIPAC trial of Steve Rosen and Keith Weissman is too partisan and considers Sibel to dangerous to consider this, but I wonder, given they are subpoenaing folks like Marc Grossman and Condi Rice, if that's being done in any kind of confrontational way, that they might consider putting Sibel on the stand too! Somehow I doubt it. But it seems like that angle should be researched to make sure there's not door to open there! Might be the break she needs to be heard!

COMMENT #7 [Permalink]

... calipendence said on 2/4/2008 @ 5:21 pm PT...





Bluebear, Perhaps you are on to something. Perhaps that is why Britney is going literally nuts now. Perhaps she's trying to push the idea that she should monetize the use of her underwear for ad or other paid content space, and her handlers think she's gone of the deep end where she might be being smart (or paranoid, depending on who's asking her to put what on it).

COMMENT #8 [Permalink]

... Phil said on 2/4/2008 @ 6:06 pm PT...





#6 Calipendence given they are subpoenaing folks like Marc Grossman and Condi Rice, if that's being done in any kind of confrontational way, Last time I seen Condi Rice under oath, she behaved like a Teenager that just got popped smoking weed in the school bathroom. (I would have defined her as a hostile witness) Without removing them from power and being protected by executive power they will not be forthcoming. And even still, they may decide to claim they don't recall. . . or rig something at higher levels. They can not even get Blackwater to admit they might have killed Iraqi civilians. Come on, no thinking person believes that nonsense. Just last week be accidentally blew up some contractors! This administration just continues to claim they did nothing wrong. So, I'd have to say the only way to get to the bottom of any of this is to get it and all it's appointees, judges, and cronies out as soon as possible. There's where the importance of paper ballots hand counted with public oversight, and an unbroken chain of custody come into play. There may be some exceptions to this but I Doubt it. I pointed out a week or two ago Technical Amendments to the Regulations Providing Whistleblower Protection for Federal Bureau of Investigation Employees and if that ain't changing Sibel's situation, then it's like I am suggesting, the problem is deeper and at higher levels of government. But I ain't no lawyer, and I ain't no journalist. Seems like if the DOJ is going to amend rules to give FBI Whistleblower's protection, and yet we still can't get Sibel's case to see the light of day, we'll be needing more than some words on an amendment (28 CFR) printed on papers somewhere collecting dust. These people don't want any cracks to allow the light to come in and the truth to get out.

COMMENT #9 [Permalink]

... Bluebear2 said on 2/5/2008 @ 8:31 am PT...

