When billionaire Bob Kraft was busted for allegedly soliciting prostitution at a Florida massage parlor last month, the immediate question that popped into everyone’s brain, given 45’s longtime friendship with Kraft and personal history as a noted sleazebag, was: “How is Donald Trump connected here?” We got our answer just a few short weeks later, when it emerged that the woman who founded the Orchids of Asia spa, Li “Cindy” Yang, was a frequent guest at Mar-a-Lago who spent the Super Bowl with the president and donated more than $16,000 to his campaign. While Yang sold Orchids of Asia prior to the spa being busted as part of an alleged human-trafficking operation, her family reportedly continues to own other massage parlors that have “gained a reputation for offering sexual services.” (Yang says that she and her family have never broken the law.) The Trump super-fan, meanwhile, reportedly came up with an alternative revenue stream: offering access to the entire Trump family and high-ranking administration officials through a business called G.Y. U.S. Investments. And now, Congressional Democrats have a few questions they’d love intelligence agencies and federal law enforcement to answer about Yang and her “apparent relationship with the president.”

In a letter addressed to the F.B.I., the Secret Service, and the Director of National Intelligence, Representatives Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler, along with Senators Dianne Feinstein and Mark Warner, wrote that they have “serious counterintelligence concerns” about the fact that an individual who founded a chain of massage parlors “suspected of involvement in prostitution and human trafficking,” and who reportedly created a business that “may be selling access” to the commander in chief to Chinese clients, has hung out at the president’s private Palm Beach club on multiple occasions, visited the White House at least once, and was photographed with Trump at the aforementioned Super Bowl party.

Prior to the press reporting Yang’s “activities” and connection to Trump, were intelligence agencies, the Bureau, or Secret Service officials aware of her “ties to alleged illicit businesses,” or did they find out about them from the media? Since the revelations about Yang and her interactions with the president, has anyone at the F.B.I. “taken any steps to investigate potential violations of law or national security vulnerabilities”? Is the president, his campaign, or his political action committee doing anything to “vet donors and determine whether funds are being contributed illicitly or through straw donors”? Who made the guest list for the Super Bowl party and whose idea was it to invite Yang? Is she the only one “offering foreigners access to the President” through Mar-a-Lago, or are there others? Does the F.B.I., the Secret Service, or other agencies in the Intelligence Community even vet the foreign nationals that attend Mar-a-Lago events, or vet anyone who shows up to the president’s private club for that matter? These are the questions Dems would like answering, by no later than 5 P.M. on March 21, if possible. “Although Ms. Yang’s activities may only be those of an unscrupulous actor,” the lawmakers wrote, “her activities also could permit adversary governments or their agents access to [the president and other] politicians to acquire potential material for blackmail or other even more nefarious purposes.”

Of course, unsaid in the letter is the fact that Mar-a-Lago effectively exists to in order for Trump to sell access to the highest bidder. While paying members have allegedly been given free rein to run at least one government agency—something agency officials characterized as receiving a “broad range of input”—others are given a front-row seat to the presidency, or an ambassadorship if they want it.