Andrew Anglin

Daily Stormer

May 9, 2015

We here at the Daily Stormer have been arguing that the agenda to emasculate men is a racial, anti-White agenda, as White males are the targets and the ones suffering from this agenda.

We have more proof of that this week as a Negress affirmative action professor at Boston University has come out and directly attacked White masculinity as a problem needing solved.

The school is claiming that this is simply free speech, and is refusing to address it, Fox News reports. We can only imagine what the situation might look like if the races were reversed.

“White masculinity isn’t a problem for america’s colleges, white masculinity is THE problem for america’s colleges,” tweeted Saida Grundy, an incoming assistant professor of sociology and African-American studies at the school back in March.

She also expressed her hateful desire to not spend money at White businesses.

As “Black businesses” are not really a thing, apparently she plans to shop exclusively at Paki stores and eat only Chinese takeout.

She has also hilariously referred to White males as a “problem population.” She has yet to explain how or why the most docile and law-abiding of all populations is a problem. And we don’t expect her to explain that any time soon. She is just acting out, like a little child, angry at people who have hurt her feelings by being better than she is.

And this is the type of character we are hiring to instruct young people. A character with an IQ so low she never could have met the normal standards for admission in a college without getting special treatment, and an emotional state so erratic it’s a wonder if she doesn’t shoot the place up.

“Why is white America so reluctant to identify white college males as a problem population?” she asked. Well, I can tell you why, Ms. Grundy: because no one has any idea what you’re even talking about.

But don’t feel bad, dear. We racists have found that White America is also very reluctant to identify young Black males as a problem population – and when we point it out, we do so with actual photographic evidence, rather than vague insinuation.

Bloggers pointed out the bizarre hate-tweets of Ms. Grundy, but Boston University insists there could be no problem with the anti-White teacher’s bias, and says she will start working as a professor in June.

“Professor Grundy is exercising her right to free speech and we respect her right to do so,” Boston University spokesman Colin Riley bleated.

Free speech groups have noted the obvious fact that Grundy has a legal right to say whatever she wants, but did note that the school is being completely hypocritical because school policy allows them to censor or fire teachers who engage in “offensive or bigoted speech.”

Robert Shibley of Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) told FoxNews.com: “If she were a student, she could also potentially be punished for violating policies banning ‘bigotry, hatred, and intolerance,’ and for not expressing her opinion ‘in good taste and decency.’ … [BU] should eliminate these policies so that it can defend every student and faculty member’s right to free speech – not just Professor Grundy’s.”

Indeed we should eliminate these policies. People should pretty much be allowed to say whatever they want. But we should also eliminate affirmative action programs which allow filth like Grundy to get into these positions in the first place.

To see the double-standard here, just look to the case of Steven Salaita, a non-White leftist professor who was fired from the University of Illinois for tweeting about the Jew genocide of Palestinians.

“Freedom of speech” has become a completely useless term in modern discourse, as it only applies to the abuse of heterosexual White males.