Brazil's lower house bans secret voting after protests Published duration 4 September 2013

image caption Protests against corruption spread through Brazilian cities in June

Brazil's Chamber of Deputies has approved a ban on secret voting in both houses of Congress.

The measure, which will now have to be approved by the Senate, had been a key demand by protesters who took to the streets of major cities in June.

They said they wanted more transparency to know where their parliamentary representatives stood on key decisions.

The constitutional amendment was first proposed seven years ago but had been stalled in the lower house since then.

But in a unanimous late-night vote on Tuesday, the 452 deputies present voted to abolish secret voting in both the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate.

'Credibility hit'

The decision came just days after legislators voted - in a secret ballot - to allow Congressman Natan Donadon to continue in his post.

image caption Natan Donadon's case prompted renewed calls for an end to secret ballots

Donadon is serving a 13-year prison sentence for corruption. He is the first serving Congressman to be sent to prison since Brazil returned to democracy in the 1980s.

Congressional President Henrique Alves said the vote had been a blow for the credibility of Brazilian lawmakers.

"I can say, without the shadow of a doubt, that I have never seen the credibility of this house take a worse hit than the one last week," he said.

The case of Donadon and other lawmakers convicted of crimes but still serving in Congress was described as a slap in the face by protesters.

Hundreds of thousands of people demonstrated in cities such as Sao Paulo, Rio de Janeiro and Salvador, demanding broad reforms to the education, health care and transport sectors, as well as an end to widespread corruption at all levels of the public sector.

The ability of Congress to hold votes in secret was seen as one of the ways legislators accused of corruption could stay in power, as their colleagues closed ranks without having to face criticism from angry constituents.