--- Please Select --- Afghanistan Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Colombia Comoros Congo, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Republic of the Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Curaçao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Polynesia Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Greece Greenland Grenada Guam Guatemala Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati North Korea South Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Laos Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Mauritania Mauritius Mexico Micronesia Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North Macedonia Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestine, State of Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Romania Russia Rwanda Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Sint Maarten Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Sudan, South Suriname Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand Togo Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Vatican City Venezuela Vietnam Virgin Islands, British Virgin Islands, U.S. Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe

Adam Bannister was Editor of IFSEC Global from 2014 through to November 2019. Adam is also a former Managing Editor at Dynamis Online Media Group.

“Bitcoin Anonymity a Myth” Says Analyst as Governments Seek Ban on End-to-End Encryption

Bitcoin anonymity is more fragile than many believe, according to a research analyst at Frost & Sullivan.

As a decentralised cryptocurrency , which means transactions are encrypted and there is no central authority or issuer like a bank, Bitcoin is favoured by the politically oppressed, the criminal underworld and technophiles suspicious of traditional banks.

But the evolution of blockchain analysis – the piecing together of transaction details to reveal details of otherwise obscured transactions – and regulatory changes sought by numerous governments could expose the identity of users of the peer-to-peer digital currency, says Vijay Michalik, research analyst for digital transformation at Frost & Sullivan.

Lw enforcement can deploy blockchain analysis, which collects metadata, incidental information linked to transactions and IP addresses and establishes common connections, to identify and blacklist criminals.

Seeking to undermine the financial activities of terrorists and criminal gangs many governments are seeking to ban end-to-end encryption, which is also used in popular consumer software like WhatsApp or Apple’s iMessage.

Threatening the currency’s anonymity, which many of its advocates would actually like to see strengthened through protocol changes, such a move would weaken the currency’s appeal. Some civil liberty campaigners defend the anonymity principle on the grounds that Bitcoin serves as a safe haven from oppressive governments for political dissidents.

“True anonymity in Bitcoin is only a myth, currently,” says Michalik. “There is full visibility of all transactions.

“While they’re only linked to a pseudonym and not a real-world name or address, every transaction is viewable through a number of different blockchain browsers.”

As Blockchain analysis techniques improve, Michalik believes, swathes of addresses could be de-anonymised over time, exposing hitherto hidden financial information to the public – and government – gaze.

“For most users, income and complete spending history would be available for anyone to see, from friends to colleagues, commercial businesses, governments and criminals,” continues Michalik. “For businesses operating in Bitcoin, cash flow, supply, demand and other competitive information would be exposed to their rivals.

“In this case, Bitcoin is a worse option than traditional finance channels.”

Get your summer security fix in this essential free 'State of the Nation' webinar Explore the state of security in the United Kingdom in this unmissable webinar led by industry titans Professor Dave Sloggett, Surveillance Camera Commissioner Tony Porter, TSI's Rick Mounfield, BSIA's Mike Reddington and Alex Carmichael of the SSAIB. Watch the free webinar

“Bitcoin Anonymity a Myth” Says Analyst as Governments Seek Ban on End-to-End Encryption Favoured by the politically oppressed, criminal underworld and technophiles suspicious of traditional banks, the world’s most successful cryptocurrency anonymises transactions to protect the identities of those involved in transactions. Adam Bannister IFSEC Global | Security and Fire News and Resources

Related Topics