I do oppose the idea of de-listing, since there are a huge number of users out there. I think the goal should be to get the fork to be re-integrated and/or replacing the current offical repo. I don’t/didn’t have the impression that anyone was rejecting the idea of PR and that reviews are important. I wouldn’t want to diverge from it. But I do think that a reviewer could also accept code more easily if it moves the progress forward, even though the code does not fit 100% the taste of the reviewer.

Especially if there is an eager contributor and the creator stated that he doesn’t have time/resources/interest in further maintaining it, so the argument that the code has to be maintained by other people “forever” does not really count in my opinion. @Catfriend1 is willing to more or less take over. I also was under the impression that he did not object having to go through PR and review, but that the constant “this needs to be better; that should be changed; that does not meet our taste” drove him away.

Again, as I said above, for my miniscule contributions, it was a bit frustrating, but YES, it did end in a way better solution. But did it also reduce my enthusiasm for contributing other things: yes, as well. So maybe we all can find a better way of interacting.