2% weight

I would stay away from this one. The Rentberry team is using Cryptonomos for their ICO, which is assures there will be issues in distribution. There is no reason for there to be such delays when issuing ERC20 -based tokens.



Even worse, they're constantly changing their terms of service thorough-out the duration of the ICO and retroactively applying them to those who have already donated.



For example, they've now decided that US citizens cannot participate, despite not mentioning this anywhere within the document. So, if you hold several thousand BERRY in your Cryptonomos account, it doesn't matter -- you will not be allowed to withdraw it.



Well that's too bad, surely refunds are available immediately, then, right? If you believe that, then you would be wrong. Refunds are only available after they finish building their KYC process that they decided to tack on afterward. So if you contribute and they decide to change the rules to make you ineligible, you must sit with your funds in ransom while they make profits on the rise in BTC or ETH. It's a poor look for the team.



The token is not required for the platform, the product has existed far before this ICO, no changes are being made to make this worthwhile on the blockchain, and the team cannot get their ducks in a row enough for a proper ICO.



I will say, though, that the UX team does a great job -- things flow and look well with the site. Besides that, though, this looks to be a useless token from an investment and possibly even utility standpoint. As change and delay issues have occurred with GigaWatt and now Rentberry (two Cryptonomos ICOs), I would also advise staying away from them in the future.

+1 Agree +1

+1