Rep. Chris Stewart Christopher (Chris) Douglas StewartAtlanta Wendy's 911 call the night of Rayshard Brooks's death released Tyler Perry offers to pay for funeral of Rayshard Brooks Current, former NHL players form diversity coalition to fight intolerance in hockey MORE (R-Utah), a member of the House Intelligence Committee, defended President Trump Donald John TrumpSteele Dossier sub-source was subject of FBI counterintelligence probe Pelosi slams Trump executive order on pre-existing conditions: It 'isn't worth the paper it's signed on' Trump 'no longer angry' at Romney because of Supreme Court stance MORE saying he would not immediately call the FBI if a foreign power gave him dirt on a political opponent, saying an ally may provide valuable information.

“For example, one of our close allies, the U.K., Australia, a number of others, and they may have information that’s valuable,” Stewart told CNN on Saturday.

“There might be valuable information that comes from one of our allies. If they look at it and it’s credible, I think we’d be foolish not to take that information,” he said.

"There might be valuable information that comes from one of our allies ... I think it would be foolish not to take that." @RepChrisStewart, when asked by @jimsciutto if it is acceptable for the President to accept information from foreign countries.https://t.co/NTAtcqHgVh pic.twitter.com/OgAksVSGKH — CNN Newsroom (@CNNnewsroom) June 14, 2019

Trump raised eyebrows this week when he told ABC News he would listen if a foreign power gave him opposition research on his eventual 2020 opponent and would not immediately call the FBI.

ADVERTISEMENT

"I think you might want to listen. There’s nothing wrong with listening," Trump said. "It’s not an interference. They have information. I think I’d take it. If I thought there was something wrong, I’d go maybe to the FBI."

Stewart noted that the phrasing was inartful but echoed a common Republican talking point claiming that Hillary Clinton Hillary Diane Rodham ClintonFox News poll: Biden ahead of Trump in Nevada, Pennsylvania and Ohio Trump, Biden court Black business owners in final election sprint The power of incumbency: How Trump is using the Oval Office to win reelection MORE’s 2016 presidential campaign used information gathered by former MI6 operative Christopher Steele to swing the last presidential race.

“I wish the president would not have said it the way he did, and I don’t think it was helpful. For one thing, it gives his opponents an opportunity to kind of beat up on him,” Stewart said.

“The president talked about doing this. Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee did it,” he added.

The conservative news outlet Free Beacon originally paid Fusion GPS for Steele’s research but stopped once Trump won the Republican nomination. A law firm representing the Democratic National Committee and Clinton’s campaign later funded the research, which sought to uncover Russian meddling in the 2016 race.

Several Republican allies of the White House have broken from the president over his recent comments, saying he should not accept any foreign dirt in the 2020 cycle.

"I think that’s wrong. That’s a mistake," Sen. Lindsey Graham Lindsey Olin GrahamSteele Dossier sub-source was subject of FBI counterintelligence probe Hillicon Valley: Subpoenas for Facebook, Google and Twitter on the cards | Wray rebuffs mail-in voting conspiracies | Reps. raise mass surveillance concerns Key Democrat opposes GOP Section 230 subpoena for Facebook, Twitter, Google MORE (R-S.C.), a frequent Trump defender, told reporters. "I’ve been consistent on this. Of a public official is approached by a foreign government offering anything of value ... the right answer is 'no.'"