the video is there is no air up there, yet the bag ,flag Click to expand...

...................... what are your credentials? as per apollo. Click to expand...

Please answer these?



Why was it in BW, not color? Click to expand...

A Detailed Look at the Camera Gear Behind the Historical Apollo 11 Moon Landing Only NASA could turn photography into literal rocket science. As Reddit user truetofiction points out in a resource-rich post, NASA meticulously decided

Why was the video at half speed? Click to expand...

he early TV pictures were shot at only around ten frames per second, later missions used the normal speed of thirty frames per second.

Why the Moon landing was not a hoax filmed in slow motion A sizeable number of otherwise quite sane people now believe that the Moon landings never took place. Here’s one of the many reasons why they are very, very wrong.

Did you see the 1st step live on tv? Click to expand...

A Detailed Look at the Camera Gear Behind the Historical Apollo 11 Moon Landing Only NASA could turn photography into literal rocket science. As Reddit user truetofiction points out in a resource-rich post, NASA meticulously decided

High enough to know you need to learn some manners on how you post!Here we go that tired old chestnut, I am not going to do your research for you.If you bother to research something with little less bias, IE don't only read things that support your own conspiracy theories, you will see this one shut down more times than you can count. Don't be lazy.Next you will say oh why are there no star in the photos, it must be faked lolOh dear, lol your not serious are you?Well, my academic achievements and professional background are none of your business, but I have been participating on forums when they were text based, before the first browsers. I remember installing Netscape and Winsock on windows 3.1 and seeing the first few web pages on the net, do you? I guess it must be nearly 30 years now, never tried to work it out. In that time I have participated in, and watched debated this Apollo Hoax nonsense more times than I can count on many forums. Including two if the biggest forums to ever exist, our previous home, and the once famous but now dead UFO-City.So i have seen it thrashed out 1000 times by scientists, geologists, Physicists and many people. So if you choose to base your opinion on a couple of conspiracy theory videos and not take the time to find out what the response to it is... well I can't do much about that can i?And as for my credentials related to Apollo 11,I used to work with an old guy, probably long dead now, who worked at Tidbinbilla tracking station and participated first hand in the tracking process from Australia. He listened and watched the live broadcasts via the dish, From the Moon, not pointing at Hollywood, he met the Apollo crew saw and held original photos. I and had the privilege of spending many a long night shift with him talking about his experiences. He had many tales about Apollo and UFO's that would make your ears lean forward to hear more!!And you know that old conspiracy that suggested that they were not alone n the moon? Well guess what, my old mate heard that transmission live via dish, the one that was not on the main broadcast channel, not only that he spoke to them about what happened up thereSo yeah, my credentials for Apollo.. better than average.What are your credentials?Oh dear you really don;t like doing unbiased research do you.Oh comon mate, your not serious are you?Look at this, check it when he jumps at around 22 seconds, now go grab you phone and film yourself jumping and compare the two.Also while your at it...I'm just going to mention one other point. A lot of supporters of the hoax "theory" say that the low gravity on the moon was simulated by slow motion filming. That would have involved shooting at a much higher frame rate and slowing it down. As some anti-hoax commenters have pointed out , this would have been difficult, because if it was shot on film, not only were there many hours of supposedly live coverage, but all of it would have had to have been shot at something like three times the normal framerate. That's an awful lot of film, and, to make matters worse, while tThat would have trebled the amount of film needed; not that any of the footage looked like it had ever been near a reel of film.But the point is that you can easily tell that this wasn't slow motion footage, but instead — quite obviously to me — the effect of low gravity, which you can't accurately simulate with slow motion. Why? Because while low gravity might make some movements look like they've been slowed down, if you look closely, it's clear that the astronauts are actually making normal-speed movements. For example, one of the astronauts (I can't remember the exact mission) tripped up or lost his footing, and fell over. You could clearly see his reaction to this — putting his hand out to break the fall — happened at normal speed.So, no, there was no slow motion simulation of low gravity, and — I'm sorry to disappoint so many people — the moon landings were not a hoax.As a matter of fact I did, I was pretty young though as I was born in 1961, but my Dad and I sat watching it together on TV in Black and White!!! :)One final word, you really need to do your own research. Don;t be Lazy and just read the bits that suit your argument. The best was to prove your own beliefs are by trying to debunk it yourself.