(NaturalNews) Those of you who are regular readers of- and your numbers are many - may not always agree with points of view expressed here, but we believe you at least consider us a trustworthy news source, a point driven home by the tens of millions of page views we receive every month.That said, how much trust would you place in us if, say, we were being paid to put out certain information or relate only a singular point of view? We're guessing that number would be much, much smaller.Yet that's what one establishment media organization -- appears to be doing, according to multiple sources who say the network has begun engaging in a practice of killing stories that portray governments and countries which have become the network's sugar daddies in a bad light.In March 2011, you may recall, much of the Middle East began to erupt. This "Arab Spring," as the general movement has been labeled, began as simple protests by seething opposition groups against long-time Arab dictators but soon exploded into full-fledged revolution and, in the case of Libya and Syria, civil war.Early on,sent a four-person crew to Bahrain to do an investigative piece "on the use of internet technologies and social media by democracy activists in the region," Glenn Greenwald, of Britain'snewspaper, reported in September.The team, led by veteran reporter Amber Lyon, a three-time Emmy Award-winning journalist, had a most eventful eight-day stay in the small Washington-backed kingdom, which is home, by the way, to the U.S. Navy's Fifth Fleet By the time Lyon and her crew arrived, a number of sources who had previously agreed to speak to them had either disappeared or took to hiding. Opponents of the Bahraini regime whospeak to them suffered government-led recriminations, "as did ordinary citizens who worked with them as fixers," Greenwald wrote.In one case, leading human rights activist Nabeel Rajab was arrested for allegedly fabricating a photo of a dead man who appears to be on a table in a medical examiner's office (no details were provided by the Bahraini police site about how the man died).In another case, Saeed Ayyad, a doctor who gave the crew a tour of his village before arranging meetings with government opponents, had his house burned down shortly thereafter.In still another case, the crew's local fixer was fired 10 days after working with them.Lyon and her crew were even violently detained by agents of the regime in front of Rajab's house. They later described the encounter after returning to the U.S. as being accosted by "20 heavily armed men" whose faces were "covered with black ski masks" and who "jumped from military vehicles" before they "pointed machine guns at" them, then forcing them all to the ground. The security forces proceeded to seize the crew's cameras, deleting photos and video footage before interrogating them against their will for six hours.The experience "both shocked and emboldened" Lyon, Greenwald wrote.The following morning after her detention, she said newspapers in the kingdom prominently featured reports about the incident that contained what she described as "outright fabrications" by the government."It made clear just how willing the regime is to lie," Lyon told Greenwald last month.But the episode strengthened her resolve as well; she committed to exposing how abusive and thug-like the regime had become in attempting to quash the fledgling democracy movement, as well as any negative coverage of the government's inevitable response."I realized there was a correlation between the amount of media attention activists receive and the regime's ability to harm them, so I felt an obligation to show the world what our sources, who risked their lives to talk to us, were facing," she said.'s cost for the team to travel to Bahrain to get the story was north of $100K, "an unusually high amount for a one-hour program of this type," according to; the story was titled, "iRevolution: Online Warriors in the Arab Spring," and it took up a 13-minute segment of the program, (it is now available on YouTube ).Per Greenwald:The highly award-winning segment, which was praised by thousands of Bahrainis on Facebook as well, aired just once in the U.S.Internationally, on's sister network,, itaired.An expensive piece of hard-hitting, award-winning journalism never aired overseas. Why?has aggressively pursued a business strategy of extensive, multifaceted financial arrangements between the network and several of the most repressive regimes around the world which the network purports to cover," writes Greenwald. "Its financial dealings with Bahrain are deep and longstanding."Specifically, he notes, the network aggressively pursued - and then came to rely on - revenue from several Middle East regimes, in order to remain viable, especially after the 2008 economic recession, "which caused the network to suffer significant losses in corporate sponsorships."The result: The employment of journalistically dubious ways to earn revenue from the very governments the network was created to cover.The arrangement goes far beyond simple advertising agreements. According to, programming is produced in what the network describes as an "in association with" type of arrangement with a government."These programs are then featured as part of CNNi's so-called 'Eye on' series ('Eye on Georgia,' 'Eye on the Philippines,' 'Eye on Poland'), or 'Marketplace Middle East,' all of which is designed to tout the positive economic, social and political features of that country," says Greenwald.As you might have guessed, disclosure of these arrangements is often deft and wholly unnoticeable by all but the most trained journalistic eye.In mid-July, Myles Smith, a Central Asia-based consultant, pointed out that a seriesproduced on oil-rich Kazakhstan was similarly skewed - and similarly government-sponsored."Most of the spots are quirky, soft-core reportage and travelogue sprinkled with carefully framed shots of the glitziest parts of Astana and Almaty. Topics include economic diversification, transportation infrastructure, skiing, and dating games," he writes. "offers no coverage of labor strikes, human rights abuses, nascent violent insurgencies, violence against women, or any other diversions from the narrative of relentless growth and limitless opportunity."Smith notes, "...[W]hat looks to the unsuspecting viewer like more ofat its finest appears in fact to be sponsored advertisements paid for by none other than Kazakhstan's oil-rich government."As for Lyon, she says that China and many other foreign, authoritarian regimes also payand other mainstream networks to run flowery, flattering propaganda pieces. And what's more, she says a number of reporters and producers at the network have privately complained about the paid-sponsorship of programming, but believe they can't complain publicly out of fear they will be blacklisted within the news industry and branded troublemakers.Couple this revelation with our earlier coverage of an admission by The New York Times that many mainstream media stories are actually scripted by the White House, and you get a sense of whyand a number of other leading "alternative" sites are where information consumers are increasingly turning to for honest reporting.