MANILA, Philippines — The three lawyers arrested by the Makati police for alleged obstruction of justice need to have a "refresher course" on what they can and cannot do, Malacañang said Monday.

While some critics claimed the arrest was a violation of human rights, presidential spokesman Harry Roque said the action was justified because lawyers have "absolutely no involvement" in an ongoing police investigation.

"As a law professor, I can assure you, in any police investigation, you can only observe, but certainly, you cannot interfere in an ongoing police investigation. Even on freedom of information, that is one of the recognized exceptions, if there is an ongoing police investigation, the public don’t even have the right to information to find out what’s ongoing," Roque said in a press briefing.

"I’ve only seen, one video, but from the video, it’s apparent, they need a refresher course on what lawyers can and cannot do and the legal profession should in fact, use this video t0 tell law students what they can and cannot do in the course of an ongoing police investigation," he added.

Lawyers Lenie Rocha, Jan Vincent Soliven and Romulo Alarcon were arrested and detained last Thursday for allegedly intimidating the policemen searching for illegal drugs in TIME, a bar in Makati City. The police claimed the lawyers "entered the premises of the bar, took several pictures and videos of the scene and intimidated the members of the searching team."

The Commission on Human Rights has assailed the police for arresting the lawyers, saying it showed "utter disrespect not only of the law profession but also of constitutionally enshrined rights."

The CHR said the three lawyers were just fulfilling their obligation as counsels of their client.

Roque said a lawyer starts when there is already a pending action in the prosecutor’s office.

"If there is anything that was wrong in the police investigation, then they can allege this either in the determination of probable cause or in the trial itself," he said.

"They should not even have been there. And what business did they have being in the area, being where the search warrant was being served, without being identifying who their client was, that’s ridiculous. You do not acquire a right to be in a police investigation, just because you claim to be representing a client that you don’t want to divulge," he added.

Roque said obstruction of justice is committed if policemen are prevented from affecting the service of a search warrant.

"Lawyers have no immunity for obstruction of justice. They have to answer for their acts, in addition to possible administrative remedies, for possible violation also of the canon of professional responsibility," he said.

"Remember, between policemen and lawyers, lawyers are held to higher standards. Validly issued warrant of arrest, why will you prevent policemen from entering or proceeding to an upper floor where the safe is supposed to be searched? They better think about this. I also taught constitutional law, it's wrong, at least from the video that I saw."

Roque said the three lawyers might have committed the acts because of their lack of experience.

"Masyado kasing mga bata (They are too young)... I’m appealing to the policemen, please show extreme patience...they’re overzealous, too. They still have to learn the ropes. I understand one of them had just passed the bar, so come on. Let's be patient and let's not make a big deal out of it," he added. — Alexis Romero