Any takers? Treasurer Scott Morrison brandishing a lump of coal during question time last week. Credit:Andrew Meares And all these events come as the National Electricity Market prepares to lose one of its biggest power stations, when Victoria' s Hazelwood shuts down at the end of next month. And what do we hear from Canberra? An acceptance that we have long-standing energy issues coming to a simultaneous boil, and the rousing declaration we need to dial down the political heat to ensure a calm but rapid response from governments to ensure lives aren't lost or factories closed because we couldn't keep the lights or air-conditioners on? Faint chance. Instead, we get but yet more railing by Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull and Josh Frydenberg, his Environment and Energy Minister, against the "complacent, negligent energy policy" by state Labor governments because they want targets for renewables beyond 2020.

Energy and Environment Minister Josh Frydenberg gets his turn with the lump of coal in question time next to Deputy Prime Minister Barnaby Joyce. Credit:Alex Ellinghausen Distant goals, imminent perils That's right. Because some states want over-the-horizon targets to fill a void beyond the decades' end, we have found our culprits. Yes, Victoria wants 40 per cent of its power to come from renewables by 2025 and Queensland seeks 50 per cent by 2030 – the latter goal shared by federal and NSW Labor. Kelly O'Dwyer, Minister for Revenue and Financial Services, was apparently less keen to hold the lump of coal proffered by Minister for Social Services Christian Porter. Credit:Alex Ellinghausen

But abandoning those distance goals won't do anything to curb today's soaring energy bills, nor bolster the grid's faltering reliability, let alone help Australia reach its 2030 national emissions goals that Turnbull professes to be serious about meeting. Not that Monday's blame deflection effort was particularly novel. Last week, we had the spectacle of Treasurer Scott Morrison brandishing a lump of coal in question time, accusing his opponents of "coalaphobia". That fossil fetish came even though the generators' own lobby, the Australian Energy Council, has concluded new coal-fired power plants are "uninvestable". While it may suit the PM in his internal battle to halt more MPs in his party's climate change-denying right from following the defection of South Australian senator Cory Bernardi, the posturing does nothing to help bring the many and varied stakeholders to the table to resolve the energy morass. Turnbull could do worse than take a lead from Don Harwin. The new Liberal NSW Energy Minister emerged from a tense few hours on Friday monitoring the market to thank residents for curbing energy demand – especially those with solar panels on their roofs – and promptly announce an Energy Security Taskforce to ensure the near-miss of widespread outages doesn't get an early reprise.

Turnbull could also ease off his criticism of South Australia's reliance on wind farms when it is the federal Renewable Energy Target that's driven investment into that state thanks in no small part to the low population and excellent resource. (September's big blackout also looks to be mostly caused by extreme weather, and the government was advised not to blame renewables.) And he should be wary of stoking the coals of the anti-renewables section of his Coalition and parts of the media. As reported this weekend, investment in new solar and wind energy is not only bringing $5.2 billion into mostly regional Australia this year alone, the funds are providing the only large-scale capacity being added to the network. Talk now of cutting the RET – itself a steep goal to reach after years of investor dismay during Tony Abbott's time as prime minister – only serves to undermine already fragile investor sentiment and diminish future appeal. Blame shifting

Certainly, many of the issues are arcane yet important. How much should the NEM market rules be revised to reflect the climate objects of cutting emissions and absorbing renewables? How much should market manipulation by major gas and electricity suppliers be investigated to ensure they aren't making constraints worse and profiteering in the process? And how much extra work is needed to ensure the grid can absorb ever more renewable energy and storage that the global economics of the industry would seem to dictate? Tony Wood, an energy expert at the Grattan Institute, agrees with calls by some state Liberal-National MP for a "nationally consistent policy approach", and says state Labor hasn't helped with its "singular focus on renewable energy". "It seems to me that everyone in this mess bears some of the blame and everyone is trying to shift that blame to someone else," he says. Ultimately, consumers expect electricity and gas supplies will be available when they flick the switch or twist the knob, and they won't forget or forgive those in charge when either source fails.

Yes, they might entertain political and gas industry calls for NSW and Victoria to loosen or reverse curbs on unconventional gas production in their states. But they'd be right to doubt such moves would make any difference to prices or supplies in the near term. Instead, they would rather see their leaders recognise we have a problem. Our energy policies aren't working and they are certainly not aligned to any coherent plan to tackle climate change – an urgency felt by many people experiencing extreme conditions that scientists say will only become more frequent. Loading So, without any real effort to drop the talking points, our politicians – led by Turnbull – should just spare us the tease and don the togas, laurel headgear and sandals, and be done with it. Follow us on Facebook