Here is a meme that is going around. Can this be true? Has Facebook really become this bad?

Actually, my search on FB turned up lots of Autism – Vaccine posts, so I guess it is not true.

What apparently is true is that Facebook is thinking about it. According to an Ethan Huff article on Natural News, “Facebook has announced that it may soon implement new policies to actively censor content on its platform that goes against the official narrative that all vaccines are 100 percent ‘safe and effective.’ (Mark Zuckerberg goes all-in with the Deadly Vaccine Industry)” Facebook wants to innoculate your brain against any doubt that you and your children need several rounds of vaccine injections or you will get sick and die.

And Youtube is now tilting your vaccine related searches in favor of “medically accurate” (translate: pro-vaccine) information as well.

A YouTube spokesperson in a statement to The Hill said the video-sharing platform has started to present medically accurate content “for people searching for vaccination-related topics,” and is “beginning to reduce” recommendations of anti-vaccination videos. (Tech takes heat as anti-vaxers go viral, Emily Birnbaum, 2/25/19)

And the platform taking the most agressively fascist approach is Pinterest.

The image-sharing network is one of the only major platforms with a specific “health misinformation” policy, put in place in 2017 after it discovered users were posting false cures for illnesses including cancer and incorrect information on vaccines. (Tech takes heat as anti-vaxers go viral, Emily Birnbaum, 2/25/19)

Its big pharma or nothing for Pinterest users.

And why the big push for vaccines now on these platforms? They say that their great sense of virtue has been aroused by the recent outbreak of measles in the state of Washington. Ignorance and anti-vaccine paranoia, they say, is putting us all at risk.

The World Health Organization (WHO) this year listed “vaccine hesitancy” among the ten greatest threats to global health . [And then, serendipitously,] the recent measles outbreak is adding new urgency to the debate [as it] resulted in the declaration of a public health emergency in Washington state last month . (Tech takes heat as anti-vaxers go viral, Emily Birnbaum, 2/25/19)

We are being told that a high level of “personal and religious belief vaccination exemptions” (at 22% in Clark County, WA) allowed for the return of measles, which had been eradicated 18 years ago. The assumption is that vaccines had eradicated it, and so, of course – obviously – lack of vaccinations had opened the door for its return.

However, vaccines were not what stopped the measles epidemic in the first place. In point of historical fact, measles was eradicated three years before the measles vaccine was introduced. And agruably, the cause of the current outbreak was not the lack of vaccinations, but the over vaccinating of the population – and the reporting on this was falsified to push the vaccine agenda.

As cited in Dr. Brian Hooker’s bombshell testimony before Congress reveals how MMR vaccines INCREASE deaths from Measles, by Mike Adams in Natural News, Dr. Hooker testified before Congress that, while it was reported that belief-based immunization exemptions was at a high 22% where the measles cluster occurred, the more accurate data from the Dept. of Health (DOH) and Center for Disease Control (CDC) indicated a much lower number would actually be the case (see article for details). What’s more, Dr. Hooker gave evidence that over vaccination of the public with the measles vaccine actually reduces resistance to measles:

Washington State has achieved the public health goal of very high vaccination rates [over 93%]. … There is a problem with measles in Washington State, but it’s not low vaccination rates, it’s actually high vaccination rates with a vaccine product unable to provide lifetime immunity … . Legislators are being told that use of personal and religious belief exemptions are putting the public’s health in danger. They are told that two infants were recently exposed to measles and the babies are in danger. But in fact, if the mothers of the children had wild measles when they were children and they are nursing, the babies may be protected. If the mothers were vaccinated, even if they are nursing, they may not be. Additionally, maternal antibodies transported across the placenta can provide vital immunity against measles for infants. … Pushing vaccination rates up even higher with an ineffective product is not the answer. As the editor of the journal Vaccine Dr. Gregory Poland of The Mayo Clinic stated in 1994, “…as measles immunization rates rise to high levels in a population, measles becomes a disease of immunized persons.” … [V]accination does not guarantee immunization and infectious diseases routinely break out in highly vaccinated communities.

So there you have it, at the very least, Facebook, et al’s virtue signaling was based on a fraudulent use of statistics that misdirected the public to look at the measles outbreak in Washington through the wrong end of the microscope. But more likely given the penchant of numerous industries and government now for using false flag events to justify desired policy, these tech companies are knowingly referencing staged reporting in order to help big pharma use the US CDC and HHS to jab you with needles, and the media willingly distorted the story to provide the excuse.

I’ll give you a prediction. This is all going to be swept under the rug, and yes Facebook will become so incredibly virtuous that they will pull the trigger on scrubbing their social network of dissenting voices on the subject of vaccination (and all other non-certified dissent). You will be given the choice to trust your government and take the shot. You and your children are to be vaccinated, and that’s that.

I make this prediction because the use of vaccines is a major agenda for some serious heavy-hitters on the world stage. The vaccines are big business for big pharma, which means big profits for them. So of course they are on board. But the spooky part is when we come up on the likes of Bill Gates. He presents us with three clues:

He is a big proponent of vaccinations worldwide; He is a Eugenicist; He will not allow his own children to be vaccinated: just yours.

Yup. According to some, he wants the rabble vaccinated, but it is not for the likes of him. Of course this is a fraudulent report. It is so fraudulent that, thanks to our increasingly vigilant internet scrubbers, it can no longer be viewed. Oh wait! I found it here.

The physician who served as Bill Gates’ private doctor in Seattle in the 1990s says the Microsoft founder and vaccine proponent “refused to vaccinate his own children” when they were young. 7 Feb 2018 – “I don’t know if he had them vaccinated as adults, but I can tell you he point blank refused to vaccinate them as children,” the physician said at a behind closed doors medical symposium in Seattle, adding “They were gorgeous kids, really smart and vivacious, and he said they would be OK as it was, they didn’t need any shots.” The comments caused a stir … . (Bill Gates’ Former Doctor Says Billionaire ‘Refused to Vaccinate His Children’, by Baxter Dmitri, Transcend Media Service, Feb 19, 2018)

Bill Gates is not the only one. The article goes on to cite a study indicating that the wealthiest Californians are the ones least likely to vaccinate their children.

Vaccine exemption percentages were highest in mostly white, high-income neighborhoods such as Orange County, Santa Barbara and parts of the Bay Area, according to CNN. The study, which was published in the American Journal of Public Heath, looked at more than 6,200 California schools and found vaccine exemptions were twice as common among kindergartners attending private institutions. (Bill Gates’ Former Doctor Says Billionaire ‘Refused to Vaccinate His Children’)

Bill Gates claims to believe that vaccines desperately needed for human health, but if he cares so deeply about humanity, why does the Gates Foundation, working with WHO, PATH, GAVI, UNICEF, and the World Bank keep getting caught around the world, “illegally testing vaccines in developing countries (India holds Gates accountable for his Vaccine Crimes),” while sweeping various adverse reactions – including deaths – under the rug, all the while declaring their tests and campaigns a “complete success?” In press releases, the Gates Foundation states things like this:

We believe that vaccines are one of the best buys in global health. In January, Bill and Melinda Gates called on the global community to make this the Decade of Vaccines. There is no better way to launch this decade than with a new vaccine that will improve and save lives. (India holds Gates accountable …)

The Express Tribune, describing an official report given exclusively to them on a campaign in Pakistan, stated:

The report states, “The procured vaccines are not tested in laboratories to confirm their efficacy and genuineness. This leaves room for use of spurious and counterfeit vaccines.” (India holds Gates accountable …)

Another report blamed the Gates Foundation and GAVI for causing 10,000 deaths, “using untested vaccinations on children (India holds Gates accountable …),” during this campaign in Pakistan.

In India, two medical experts accused the Gates Foundation of unethical behavior, stating, according to Pharmabiz.com, that the foundation failed,

“to thoroughly investigate the increase in the incidence of non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP) in areas where many doses of vaccine were used. NPAFP is clinically indistinguishable from polio paralysis but twice as deadly.” … The authors noted that while India was polio-free in 2011, in the same year, there were 47500 cases of NPAFP. While data from India’s National Polio Surveillance Project showed NPAFP rate increased in proportion to the number of polio vaccine doses received, independent studies showed that children identified with NPAFP “were at more than twice the risk of dying than those with wild polio infection.” (India holds Gates accountable …)

If you would like to see a nicely thorough, but concise roundup on the Gates philanthropic vaccination debacle, check in on this 12 minute video:

We begin to get the idea that people like the Gates’ treat those around the world that don’t look like them as though they are cattle.

Indeed, that is the exact attitude of eugenicists. The American and British Eugenics Societies were founded on the writings of Francis Galton, the “humanist” who believed that inferior races and people should cease to breed or “be considered enemies of the State,” and exterminated.

Bill Gates, as it turns out is probably blue-blood, descended from Sir Thomas Gates, governor of the aristocratic Jamestown colony (possibly through his grandson, George Gates of Hartford, CT). More recently he descends, it seems, from Frederick T. Gates, senior advisor to John D. Rockefeller (1839-1937) – then the richest man on earth. Coincidentally the original Rockefeller fortune was built establishing the modern pharmaceutical industry, which fortune the family then invested in oil (The Rockefellers – From Drug And Oil Monopoly To War On Drugs And Hemp Prohibition).

The first eugenics society was established in England, but the Rockefellers exerted their considerable wealth and influence spreading it elsewhere. It became established in the United States in the early 1900s through the funding and efforts of men like Carnegie, Rockefeller, and Kellogg. The Rockefellers were also instrumental in exporting eugenics to Germany, where it became central to the Nazi theory of the German super race. Even with the fall of the Nazi regime at the end of WWII, the Nazi eugenicists remained well protected by the American establishment (see The Ruling Elite’s Agenda for Global Population Reduction). (GINSBURG, EUGENICIST, posted on Infowars in 2009).

Following the war, the Rockefellers reorganized the eugenics movement in the U.S. from within their own family offices, assisting the Eugenics Society (England) in creating a eugenics sub-committee that became known as the International Planned Parenthood Federation. The above article quotes Dr. Len Horowitz:

This, then, is the private, international apparatus which has set the world up for a global holocaust, under the UN flag.” (GINSBURG, EUGENICIST)

Eugenicists have been the driving force behind the pro-abortion movement. But we were talking about what turns out to be another arm of the eugenics movement: vaccinations.

Perhaps an easy way to get at this is through the efforts of Robert de Niro to blow the whistle on the dangers and disinformation about vaccines. He created the worldclass documentary, Vaxxed (no longer availabe streamed on Amazon Prime Video, but the DVD is a best seller), on the subject and was going to debut it at the Tribeca Film Festival in (I think) 2015 or 16. The Sloan Foundation, which partners with the festival, prevented inclusion of the film.

Greg White, in Vaccine News, quotes the Tribeca webpage:

The New York based Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, founded in 1934, makes grants in science, technology and economic performance… The Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, in partnership with the Tribeca Film Institute, provides funding for narrative features or series that are scientifically relevant, accurate, and exciting through the TFI Sloan Filmmaker Fund. (All vaccine research eventually leads to Bill Gates and Nazi eugenics… vaccines used as vector for depopulation experiments, by Greg White, 4/14/2016)

So we see that the Sloan Foundation is a gatekeeper for what “scientific” information reaches the public through this venue. Trouble is, the Sloan Foundation has a heavy bias:

The Sloan Foundation is named after Alfred P. Sloan, a Nazi collaborator who hated both Jews and blacks. Like Bill Gates, Sloan had a vested interest in the eugenics movement, which eventually went on to become the Human Genome Project. (All vaccine research eventually leads to Bill Gates and Nazi eugenics…)

So we see that wealthy and powerful eugenicists want us all taking their injections, and won’t stand for their own children being vaccinated. Why? It is because the currently available vaccine regimes are not helpful: they are harmful. In general it should be said that the current rounds of vaccine are likely to cause (among other maladies) various forms of brain or nervous system damage in some cases leading to death. A bold statement to be sure, but as White points out:

The Sloan Foundation, together with the Rockefeller nexus, held a long standing interest in population reduction, including their involvement with the introduction of mysterious new vaccines together with the World Health Organization, which has a stated policy of population reduction, as clearly set forth in Agenda 21. (truthaboutagenda21.com). [This is p]opulation control under the cover of health care. (ethiofreedom.com). (All vaccine research eventually leads to Bill Gates and Nazi eugenics…)

One does not reduce population by saving lives.

Of course there are other uses for vaccines. Cocktails could be made, for example, that would improve heath, or improve longevity, or increase IQ.

I wonder who would get those? The eugenicists intend a future in which parents and infants are analyzed and classified and marked for treatment: ranging from death to enhancement. A quota system would evolve for the various classes of humans, which would be biologically and behaviorally tailored for their purposes in life. The children of the elite, of course, would be the healthiest, most beautiful and intelligent, and be molded and positioned for a very long life of leisure and pleasure. Welcome to the perfected world of eugenics.

I’m not done yet. Stand by for Part II: Eugenics – The Dream Unfolds. And Part III: Eugenics Tomorrow – The Evolutionary Leap.

Check out Minds! The uncensored Facebook

______________________End_______________________