I didn't get to finish my review, so I'm going to finish it here:

The idea to make an object identical to 2711 except for one thing but not actually called an instance of 2711 in the description doesn't make very much sense. Saying that it appears to be a modified version of 2711 makes more sense, as there only seems to be one difference between the two. Just saying it's an alternate version seems kind of unclinical to me.

"An instance of SCP-2711 is held in SCP-2847-X's hand, and has the additional anomalous property of repairing all damage done to it yadda yadda" would be an example of what I mean.