Remember the time when Indian streets used to get deserted to watch Ramanand Sagar’s Ramayan and flock in homes with television sets? Indians still have the same zeal for the same benevolent God. The entire nation again got charged up today for the apparent final hearing of mother of all cases – Ram Janmabhumi!. A logical conclusion was expected to be reached in the Supreme Court today.

A special three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra and comprising of Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice S.A. Nazeer, heard the case today after 5th December, 2017, giving time to the parties in case to file the requisite pleadings, i.e. documents are translated, filed and numbered before the Supreme court registry.

The adorable child form of Shri Ram (Ramlala) is loved and worshipped in countless Hindu houses, Lord Ram is counted as the supreme among Avatars, an embodiment of Justice, Morals and Ethics. It is for nothing that we call Shri Ram Maryadapurushottam Shri Ram (The Foremost among the Virtuous)

Ram Janmabhumi case is older than Independent India. Through legal wrangling, quotes and misquotes, proofs and abominations, the case has been dragged mercilessly thereby denying Hindus their natural right of worshipping their supreme deity. Even though everyone is aware of the prolonged legal battles in our country, but do you know the segment that made sure that the issue is dragged forever – our dear Leftists!

Dr K.K. Muhammad (former Regional Director (North) of the ASI writes in his autobiography, “A team of Left Historians in JNU such as Romila Thapar, Bipin Chandra, and S. Gopal argued that there was no mention of the dismantling of the temple before the nineteenth century and Ayodhya was a Buddhist-Jain center. Historians such as Irfan Habib, R. S. Sharma, Athar Ali, D. N. Jha, Suraj Bhan, too joined and it became a big grouping”

As the leftists went on, they questioned the authenticity of Valmiki Ramayan, said that the worship of Shri Ram began in 18th – 19th century and denied demolition of Ram janmabhumi temple stating that there was no temple at the site ever.

K.K. Muhammad further states:

“… instilled courage and gave false hopes to the BMAC. This resulted in a reversal of the thought process amongst Muslims who had till then, been pondering wholeheartedly about giving back the mosque and settling the matter amicably. They came to a renewed conclusion that the mosque will not be given…”

On 5th December, senior Congress leader Kapil Sibal tried hard to give a political angle to Ram Janmabhumi case asking the case to be deferred till July 2019 i.e. after the next Lok Sabha elections. Not only did he lie about not appearing for Sunni Wakf Board, he also asked the case to be deferred after 2019 elections.

BJP leader and advocate Gaurav Bhatia had produced Supreme Court’s documents, Civil Appeal No 004192/2011, in his tweet where it showed Kapil Sibal appeared for Sunni Wakf Board.

Hon'ble Supreme Court order shows that Mr Sibal did appear for Sunni Waqf Board.

Please see the marked section

Civil Appeal No 004192/2011

Party Name Sunni Waqf Board pic.twitter.com/qYkQYmAYvS — Gaurav Bhatia (@gauravbh) December 6, 2017

The Supreme Court had rejected senior advocate Kapil Sibal’s request to push the Ram Janmabhumi hearing to July 2019, after the next Lok Sabha elections are over. Sunni Wakf Board and Congress also sidelined themselves from Sibal’s bizarre demand.

But the Supreme Court today delivered a shocker, it said that it will deal with the Ram Janmabhumi case as a pure land dispute, an indication that the centuries-old history attached to the case was of no significance to it thereby weakening the claim of Hindus which is Right to Worship. Earlier, Allahabad High Court had divided the disputed land among the Sunni Wakf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and Ram Lalla or Infant Rama, which is represented by the Hindu Mahasabha for the construction of the Ram Janmabhumi temple.

The Supreme Court on Thursday adjourned the hearing in the Babri Masjid- Ram Janmabhumi case as some documents and translations have not yet been filed, ANI reported. The court added that it won’t allow additional parties in the case and all the dead petitioners’ names will be removed. The case will be next heard on March 14.

As the court, parties in the Ram Janmabhumi case and political parties continue to drag the issue, our dear infant Ram Lalla sits under a makeshift canopy. There is nothing more shameful and nothing more hurtful for Hindus than a prolonged fight for one temple of their own God in one of the only nations that witnessed Shri Ram walking bare footed on its land.

References:

https://tfipost.com/2017/12/leftist-historians-ramjanmabhumi-01/

http://www.firstpost.com/india/ayodhya-issue-supreme-court-likely-to-commence-final-hearings-in-batch-of-petitions-in-babri-masjid-case-4341129.html

https://navbharattimes.indiatimes.com/india/ayodhya-case-supreme-court-resumes-hearing-in-ram-janmabhoomi-babri-masjid-title-dispute/articleshow/62834161.cms

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/ayodhya-dispute-hearing-underway-in-supreme-court/articleshow/62834286.cms

https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/ayodhya-case-sc-says-will-deal-with-matter-as-pure-land-dispute-seeks-english-translation-of-documents/story-4QoN4wj8alsHJgR6goVvmI.html