With no way to defend him on the substance, President Donald Trump’s defenders have instead argued that Trump did nothing wrong and that therefore, there are no grounds for an impeachment inquiry. A memo from House Republicans noted, “U.S. security assistance flowed to Ukraine … without Ukraine investigating President Trump’s political rivals.” This absurd argument holds that, since Trump ultimately released the military aid he initially withheld from Ukraine, there was no extortion. This just isn’t true.

At Trump’s order, the government withheld crucial military aid to Ukraine, in violation of U.S. law.

In July, the Department of Defense (DOD) informed the White House that if military aid wasn’t released by August 6, “it would not be able to spend it all by the end of the fiscal year” as required by federal law. The Pentagon even prepared a legal analysis challenging the decision.

The White House did not release the aid by the DOD’s deadline. Missing this deadline made it clear that the White House was willing to unlawfully deny Ukraine aid to get what it wanted.

The order came from the top: Trump directed his acting chief of staff, Mick Mulvaney, to withhold the aid. Office of Management and Budget officials then informed the State Department and the DOD about the directive. Mulvaney and William Taylor, the top U.S. diplomat in Ukraine, have both confirmed this.

Trump only released the aid once he was caught and the scheme was exposed.

The White House released the aid on September 11. By then, both Congress and the White House already knew a whistleblower had filed a complaint about Trump’s extortion of Ukraine.

Congress was also pressuring the White House to release the aid.

Two days before Trump released the aid, U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland reportedly “told Trump that concerns were being raised that the President’s actions amounted to a quid pro quo.”

Ukraine knew the aid was being withheld and was aware that it was being extorted.