Dec. 17, 2018

CONTACT: Jill Rosen

Office: 443-997-9906

Cell: 443-547-8805

jrosen@jhu.edu @JHUmediareps

When improved antidepressants hit the market in the 1980s, heavy drinking among people with depression dropped 22 percent, suggesting people who knowingly use drugs and alcohol to relieve mental and physical pain will switch to safer, better treatment options when they can get them, a new Johns Hopkins University study found.

“We know depression and heavy drinking go hand in hand, but no one has tested the notion that if good medicine comes along many people will drink less or abstain altogether,” said Johns Hopkins economist Nicholas Papageorge. “People look at heavy drinking as a problem or a mistake. But what we’re saying is people rationally self-medicate. If there are no good options, people will use what’s available.”

The findings are detailed in a working paper circulated today by the National Bureau of Economic Research.

To test their theory, Papageorge and Michael Darden, an economist at the university’s Carey Business School, used 40 years of longitudinal data from the Framingham Heart Study, a study where 5,000 people reported alcohol, tobacco and antidepressant consumption, as well as depression.

Between 1971 and the late 1980s, less than two percent of those surveyed were on antidepressants. But in 1988, with the introduction of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, a class of antidepressants widely considered to be a vast improvement over what had been on the market to treat depression, antidepressant use jumped. Simultaneously, heavy drinking among those with moderate depression dropped 22 percent, the researchers found. There was also a 12 percent increase in the number of people who reported entirely abstaining from alcohol.

The result was primarily driven by men, who made up more of the heavy drinkers.

The results might have been even stronger, the researchers said, if not for heavy drinkers who had been doing so for a long time and had become addicted and unable to try another option, even a better one, the researchers said. However, a model the researchers created shows as many as 30 percent of the heavy drinkers would have switched to antidepressants if they factored out this long-term drinking effect.

“When SSRIs come along, the options for managing depressive symptoms improves,” Darden said. “But if you’ve been self-medicating for a long time, even with the introduction of SSRIs it may be difficult for you to switch because of dependence.”

Papageorge and Darden believe policymakers should take their self-medication theory into account when considering how to combat addiction. Instead of criminalizing it, they suggest policymakers promote medical innovation to come up with better treatments. One concern in making substances used to self-medicate harder to obtain, for example, by limiting supply, raising prices or criminalizing them, is that people could respond by turning to even more dangerous substances.

“We hear about all of these people in downward addiction spirals but what we hear tends to ignore the point that many, many of these people started using drugs or alcohol to mitigate their symptoms,” Papageorge said. “I’m not saying that’s OK, but if we want to understand addiction, it’s important to look at the whole history and I don’t think that’s been discussed enough.

###

Johns Hopkins University news releases are available online, as is information for reporters. To arrange a video or audio interview with a Johns Hopkins expert, contact a media representative listed above or visit our studio web page. Find more Johns Hopkins stories on the Hub.