Despite millions of demonstration of telekinesis, many people, including some of my own friends and family, still do not believe in telekinesis. Little do these simpletons know, there is a ton of empirical evidence and well documented scientific proof supporting the existence of telekinesis. I’m not talking about some no-name scientist from a third world country either. I am talking about reliable and reputable sources like Harvard, Princeton and Yale universities.

For example, at Princeton University Dr Robert G. Jahn, spent many years amassing an enormous database of empirical evidence on telekinesis that clearly indicates the phenomena is very much a reality. Dr. Jahn founded the Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research (PEAR) group which undertook countless experiments under controlled, scientific conditions to measure the effect of the power of the human mind using a wide range of instruments.

Dr. Jahn and his staff at Princeton scientifically documented the existence of telekinesis for nearly thirty years. In the end this is what Dr. Jahn had to say regarding the closing of their studies. “For 28 years, we’ve done what we wanted to do, and there’s no reason to stay and generate more of the same data. If people don’t believe us after all the results we’ve produced, then they never will.”

Unfortunately he is right. Most simple minded people will never believe in telekinesis because they either don’t know the facts or don’t want to know. You see telekinesis destroys the rigid and narrow minded perception of reality the ruling class is promoting. If people realize who they truly are (God incarnate) and what they are capable of doing, the false religions and scientific paradigms will fall like a house of cards.

The last thing the powers that be want is for humanity to discover that everything is energy and once we master energy we can create the world we want. We can heal every disease, control the elements, influence the weather, transcend time and space and potentially live in harmony forever. There will be no need for government, religion, military, legal or monetary systems. All is one and everything is connected so we would naturally take care of one another and our environment.

So whether you are an aspiring practitioner or a world famous telekinesis legend like Nina Kulagina, don’t be discouraged. The burden of proof is not on your shoulders. Even the best telekinesis demonstration will be ridiculed and dismissed by closed-minded fools. History rewards the bold, so don’t let their confusion and criticism keep you from exhibiting your telekinetic abilities openly and proudly.

Publications

General Overviews

The Persistent Paradox of Psychic Phenomena: An Engineering Perspective (1982). Proceedings IEEE, 70, No.2, pp.136-170.

Engineering Anomalies Research (1987). J. Scientific Exploration, 1, No.1, pp.21- 50.

The Complementarity of Consciousness (1991). Tech. Report 91006, December 1991 (13 pages). [Published in modified form in K.R. Rao, ed., Cultivating Consciousness for Enhancing Human Potential, Wellness, and Healing. (Westport, CT and London: Praeger, 1993) pp. 111-121.]

Consciousness and Anomalous Physical Phenomena (1995). PEAR Technical Note 95004, May 1995 (32 pages).

The PEAR Proposition (2005). J. Scientific Exploration, 19, No.2, pp.195-246.

Endophysical Models Based on Empirical Data (2005). R. Buccheri, A. Elitzur, M. Saniga, eds., Endophysics, Time, Quantum and the Subjective: Proceedings of the ZiF Interdisciplinary Research Workshop, Bielefeld, Germany, 17-22 January 2005. (Singapore: World Scientific Publishing, 2005) pp.81-102.

Consciousness, Information, and Living Systems (2005). Cellular & Molecular Biology, 51, pp.703-714.

Human/Machine Experiments

Operator-Related Anomalies in a Random Mechanical Cascade (1988). J. Scientific Exploration, 2, No.2, pp.155-179.*

Random Event Generator Qualification, Calibration, and Analysis. Tech. Report 89001, April 1989 (46 pages).

Count Population Profiles in Engineering Anomalies Experiments (1991). J. Scientific Exploration, 5, No.2, pp.205-232.

Radin, D. I., and Nelson, R. D. (1989). Evidence for consciousness-related anomalies in random physical systems. Foundations of Physics, Vol.19, No.12, pp.1499-1514.

Co-Operator Experiments with an REG Device (1991). Tech. Report PEAR 91005, December 1991 (23 pages). [Published in modified form in K.R. Rao, ed., Cultivating Consciousness for Enhancing Human Potential, Wellness, and Healing. (Westport, CT and London: Praeger, 1993) pp.149-163.]

Experiments in Remote Human/Machine Interaction (1992). J. Scientific Exploration, 6, No.4, pp.311-332.

Series Position Effects in Random Event Generator Experiments (1994). J. Scientific Exploration, 8, No.2, pp.197-215.*

A Linear Pendulum Experiment: Effects of Operator Intention on Damping Rate (1994). J. Scientific Exploration, 8, No.4, pp.471-489.*

Correlations of Random Binary Sequences with Pre-Stated Operator Intention: A Review of a 12-Year Program (1997). J. Scientific Exploration, 11, No.3, pp.345-367.*

Gender Differences in Human/Machine Anomalies (1998). J. Scientific Exploration, 12, No.1, pp.3-55.*

Construction and Use of Random Event Generators in Human/Machine Anomalies Experiments (1998). Tech. Note 98002, June 1998 (10 pages).

A Double-Slit Diffraction Experiment to Investigate Claims of Consciousness-Related Anomalies (1998). J. Scientific Exploration, 12, No.4, pp.543-550.*

ArtREG: A Random Event Experiment Utilizing Picture-Preference Feedback (2000). J. Scientific Exploration, 14, No.3, pp.383-409.*

Mind/Machine Interaction Consortium: PortREG Replication Experiments (2000). J. Scientific Exploration, 14, No.4, pp.499-555.*

The MegaREG Experiment: Replication and Interpretation (2004). J. Scientific Exploration, 18, No.3, pp.369–397.*

Exploring the Possible Effects of Johrei Techniques on the Behavior of Random Physical Systems (2006). Tech. Report 2006. 01, January 2006 (30 pages).

Remote Perception

Precognitive Remote Viewing in the Chicago Area: A Replication of the Stanford Experiment (1979). J. Parapsychology, 43, pp.17-30.

Precognitive Remote Perception (1983). Tech. Report 83003, August 1983 (81 pages).

Precognitive Remote Perception, III: Complete Binary Database with Analytical Refinements (1989). Tech. Report 89002, August 1989 (102 pages).

Response to Hansen, Utts, and Markwick: Statistical and Methodological Problems of the PEAR Remote Viewing (sic) Experiments (1992). J. Parapsychology, 56, No.2, pp.115-146.

Precognitive Remote Perception: Replication of Remote Viewing (1996). J. Scientific Exploration, 10, No.1, pp.109-110.

Information and Uncertainty in Remote Perception Research (2003). Journal of Scientific Exploration, 17, No.2, pp.207-241.*

FieldREG

FieldREG Anomalies in Group Situations (1996). J. Scientific Exploration, 10, No.1, pp.111-141.*

FieldREG Measurements in Egypt: Resonant Consciousness at Sacred Sites (1997). Tech. Note 97002, July 1997 (36 pages).

FieldREGII: Consciousness Field Effects: Replications and Explorations (1998). J. Scientific Exploration, 12, No.3, pp.425-454.*

Theoretical Models and Analytical Methodology

On the Quantum Mechanics of Consciousness, With Application to Anomalous Phenomena (1986). Foundations of Physics, 16, No.8, pp.721-772.* (An Appendix (in the form of a Tech. Note) is also available which contains a collection of relevant quotations by many of the patriarchs of modern physics.)

Physical Aspects of Psychic Phenomena (1988). Physics Bulletin, 39, pp.235-236.

Evidence for Consciousness-Related Anomalies in Random Physical Systems (1989). Foundations of Physics, 19, No.12, pp.1499-1514.*

On the Bayesian Analysis of REG Data (1992). J. Scientific Exploration, 6, No.1, pp.23-45.

Effect Size per Hour: A Natural Unit for Interpreting Anomalies Experiments (1994). Tech. Note 94003, September 1994 (34 pages).

Selection Versus Influence Revisited: New Method and Conclusions (1996). J. Scientific Exploration, 10, No.2, pp.253-267.

Combination of Results from Multiple Experiments (1997). Tech. Note 97008, October 1997 (15 pages).

Empirical Evidence Against Decision Augmentation Theory (1998). J. Scientific Exploration, 12, No.2, pp.231-257.*

Evidence That Anomalous Statistical Influence Depends on the Details of the Random Process (1998). J. Scientific Exploration, 12, No.3, pp.407-423.*

Contributions to Variance in REG Experiments: ANOVA Models and Specialized Subsidiary Analyses (2000). J. Scientific Exploration, 14, No.1, pp.73-89.*

Overview of Several Theoretical Models of PEAR Data (2000). J. Scientific Exploration, 14, No.2, pp.163-194.

A Modular Model of Mind/Matter Manifestations (M5) (2001). J. Scientific Exploration, 15, No.3, pp.299-329.*

M*: Vector Representation of the Subliminal Seed Regime of M5 (2002). J. Scientific Exploration, 16, No.3, pp.341-357.*

Statistical Consequences of Data Selection (2003). Tech. Note 2003. 02, April 2003 (18 pages).

Problems of Reproducibility in Complex Mind-Matter Systems (2003). J. Scientific Exploration, 17, No.2, pp.243-270.*

Sensors, Filters, and the Source of Reality (2004). J. Scientific Exploration, 18, No.4, pp.547–570.

Philosophical Perspectives and Cross-Disciplinary Considerations

Anomalies: Analysis and Aesthetics (1989). J. Scientific Exploration, 3, No.1, pp.15-26, 1989.

Acoustical Resonances of Assorted Ancient Structures (1995). PEAR Tech Report #95002, ICRL Tech Report #95.1, March 1995. (Also published as “Acoustical Resonances of Assorted Ancient Structures.” J. Acoustical Society of America, 99, No. 2, pp. 649-658, 1996, and as “Preliminary Investigations and Cognitive Considerations of the Acoustical Resonances of Selected Archaeological Sites,” Antiquity, 70, No. 268, pp. 665-666, 1996.)

Information, Consciousness, and Health (1996). Alternative Therapies, 2, No. 3, pp. 32-38.

Toward a Philosophy of Science in Women’s Health Research (1996). J. Scientific Exploration, 10, No. 4, pp. 535-545.

The Subterranean Chamber of the Pyramid of Khufu: A Ritual Map of Ancient Egypt? (1997. Tech. Note 98001, February 1997 (20 pages).

Wishing for Good Weather: A Natural Experiment in Group Consciousness (1997). J. Scientific Exploration, 11, No. 1, pp. 47-58.*

Subjectivity and Intuition in the Scientific Method (1997). (Reprint from Intuition: The Inside Story, R. Davis-Floyd and P. Sven Arvidson, eds., New York and London: Routledge, 1997, pp. 121-128).

Science of the Subjective (1997). J. Scientific Exploration, 11, No. 2, pp. 201-224.*

The Physical Basis of Intentional Healing Systems (1999). Tech. Note 99001, January 1999 (28 pages).

Deviations from Physical Randomness Due to Human Agent Intention? (1999). Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 10, No. 6, pp. 935-952.

The Case for Inertia as a Vacuum Effect: A Reply to Woodward and Mahood (2000). Foundations of Physics, 30, No. 1,pp. 59-80.

Inertial Mass and the Quantum Vacuum Fields (2001). Ann. Physics, 10, 5, pp.393-414.

20th and 21st Century Science: Reflections and Projections (2001). J. Scientific Exploration, 15, No. 1, pp. 21-31.

The Challenge of Consciousness (2001). J. Scientific Exploration, 15, No. 4, pp. 443-457.

Source: http://www.princeton.edu/~pear/publications.html

May the truth prevail and the force be with you.

Sincerely,

Trebor7

To learn more about telekinesis please visit: http://www.avatarenergymaster.com/ or http://www.howtotelekinesis.com/