New York Attorney General Letitia James is hard at work. On behalf of California, evidently. It seems they need help banning “rapid fire bullet delivery systems”:

I'm taking action to defend California's constitutional ban on high capacity gun magazines. These rapid fire bullet delivery systems endanger the safety of all Americans & have no place in our homes. We'll continue to protect our communities from acts of preventable gun violence. — NY AG James (@NewYorkStateAG) July 23, 2019

Maybe she should take action to educate herself on guns.

You have absolutely no idea what you are saying, do you? — Silence and Frost (@secjr112) July 23, 2019

that’s…not how any of this works — shmasonsays (@shmasonsays) July 23, 2019

Constitutional ban? ? — jase72 (@jase_1972) July 23, 2019

"rapid fire bullet delivery systems" https://t.co/fN4gwZdjQI — Kaiju the Brickslayer (@kaijubushi) July 23, 2019

I want one of them rapid fire bullet delivery systems!!! — Chris Hanke (@C_Hanke2) July 23, 2019

"Rapid fire bullet delivery systems"

Yeah, you sure know your firearms… — Watjalukinat (@watjalukinat) July 23, 2019

How exactly is a magazine a "rapid fire bullet delivery system"? — Jason (@MrSinclairToYou) July 23, 2019

“rapid fire bullet delivery systems” this is gibberish — Jeff (@jeff_karr) July 23, 2019

Somebody allowed you to use 'rapid fire bullet deliver system' — fire them. Also, no. — Dave Mullen (@dmullen37) July 23, 2019

" rapid fire bullet delivery systems " OMG !!! Where in the F. did you come up with that terminology ??? please shut up. Thanks. — The Grim Skipper (@Skip60858883) July 23, 2019

Rapid fire delivery system? What are you talking about? a magazine has no effect whatsoever on a weapon's rate of fire. — Matt Cipollone (@MattCipollone_) July 23, 2019

Capacity and speed are unrelated here. Blindly taking some uneducated action is NOT better than no action at all until you have a clue about that which you want to change. — palomas.ink (@palomas_ink) July 23, 2019

How about you start with understanding the subject matter before wading in? This tweet tells that you know nothing about guns. — Taro Tsujimoto (@RCannon74) July 23, 2019

You literally know nothing about firearms, do you? — #iNoticeThings (@RTRAtlanta) July 23, 2019

You don’t understand firearms… do you? — Daniel Monger (@dmonger11b) July 23, 2019

For an attorney general, you're amazingly uneducated on both firearms and Constitutional law. In short, you're not qualified to speak on the subject. — Zesko Whirligan ⭐⭐⭐ (@ZeskoWhirligan) July 23, 2019

Hey Tish, if you are going to waste my tax dollars, could you at least LEARN about the subject you are wasting it on? — a jim cooks in brooklyn (@crankyuncle2) July 23, 2019

Is that so much to ask?