120 fake weapons are turned in Buyback Some youngsters taking part were touched by gun violence from A1

The first 250 children to donate their toy guns get a gift card from a local supermarket during a toy gun buy back in 2014 at the Boys & Girls Club on Broadway in Cleveland.

(Lonnie Timmons III/Plain Dealer)

Jack D'Aurora is a Columbus attorney.

COLUMBUS, Ohio -- Florida pediatricians had a good day in court recently when the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals struck down, on First Amendment grounds, a statute that prohibited them from addressing gun safety with parents.

The battle over a pediatrician's right to freely practice medicine and protect the safety of children was one that never should have occurred, but Florida legislators thought it necessary to protect gun rights when, in fact, gun rights were never threatened.

The legal conflict began in 2011, when several pediatricians and medical associations challenged the statute in federal court. In 2012, the court held the law was unconstitutional because it infringed on free speech. After a three-judge panel of the 11th Circuit reversed the trial court's decision in 2014, the pediatricians asked the court's entire panel of 11 judges to hear the case. Last month, the full panel affirmed the trial court's decision, meaning pediatricians may resume talking about gun safety.

To pediatricians, asking about guns is no different than asking about chemicals, electrical outlets or swimming pools. They're all a source of danger for kids.

Pediatricians inquire about guns because some parents don't understand the risk and lack knowledge about safe storage. There's evidence to support the pediatricians' concerns.

The Children's Defense Fund reported that 883 children and teens nationwide died in 2010 from gun suicide and accidental shootings; 143 were 14 and under. From 2000 through 2010, 384 Florida children died from gun suicide and 54 from accidental shootings.

What was striking about the law is that it was based on six anecdotal stories presented by legislators. Legislators testified about their constituents being subjected to unwelcome questions or comments about gun ownership. One legislator testified that a mother was separated from her children while medical personnel interrogated them about guns.

Significantly, the court record reflected that, "There was no other evidence, empirical or otherwise, presented to or cited by the Florida legislature" about harm suffered by gun owners.

Florida isn't alone in trying to suppress physicians. In 2013 and 2015, Republican state Sen. Kris Jordan, of Ostrander, north of Columbus, introduced similar bills in Ohio that, fortunately, went nowhere. In January, Republican state Sen. Bob Hall of Edgewood, Texas, east of Dallas, introduced comparable legislation in Texas.

These efforts are misguided. Not everything that deals with guns touches on the Second Amendment.

The National Rifle Association disagrees. It views the pediatricians' practice as an attack on guns and an invasion of privacy.

Chris Cox, executive director for the NRA's Institute for Legislative Action, lauded the 2014 reversal from the 11th Circuit: "Every gun owner in Florida and across the country is grateful for this common sense ruling. It is not a physician's business whether his or her patient chooses to exercise their fundamental, individual right to own a firearm."

Cox is right -- to an extent. It's not a physician's business whether a parent owns a gun, but it is a physician's concern that parents be knowledgeable about the dangers some take for granted. Children who shoot themselves and others do so only because an adult left a loaded gun where it could be easily found.

The reality is, gun rights were never at risk in Florida. Patients were always free to refuse to answer questions about guns. Moreover, as the full panel of the 11th Circuit noted, the Second Amendment "does not preclude questions about, commentary on, or criticism for the exercise of that right."

Ironically, Florida passed a statute in 1989 that made it a misdemeanor to fail to secure guns that are obtained by minors without supervision.

In passing the statute, the legislature recognized that "a tragically large number of Florida children have been accidentally killed or seriously injured by negligently stored firearms" and "that placing firearms within the reach or easy access of children is irresponsible."

If anything, the pediatricians were endeavoring to meet the legislature's public safety concerns articulated years prior.

The Florida statute illustrates how a legislature and the NRA can lose sight of the fact that hundreds of kids are killed annually when guns are left out in the open. Gun rights aren't at risk. The lives of children are, and those lives are all the pediatricians care about.

Jack D'Aurora, a practicing attorney in Columbus, writes frequently on gun policy.

***********

Have something to say about this topic? Use the comments to share your thoughts, and stay informed when readers reply to your comments by using the Notification Settings (in blue) just below.