WARNING: Contains graphic content

What a succubus, a sexual demon, an insatiable skank.

The libidinous floozy of a young man’s — or old man’s — dreams.

She wanted it. She asked for it. She made it happen.

Not that there’s anything wrong with any of that, except when the woman afterwards cries rape.

Which is what defense lawyer Harry Black posited six ways from Sunday on Thursday, with a sexual assault complainant in the stand.

It was the alleged victim who orchestrated events in a hotel room in the early morning hours of January 16, 2015, in this version of events.

From the moment she reached out and attempted to undo one man’s shirt-button — “I did not” — to going up into the pre-booked room and unzipping his pants — “I did not” — to demanding “Are you going to f--- me?” — “I did not” — it was all down to her, the ménage à quatre that ensued. The three police constables merely did a wanton woman’s bidding: first one, then the other, then one and the other together, then the other-other.

Leslie Nyznik, Joshua Cabero and Sameer Kara have each pleaded not guilty to a charge of sexual assault against a female parking enforcement officer at the judge-alone trial which yesterday moved into what will doubtless be a prolonged cross-examination stage.

Unlike the defendants, the complainant doesn’t have a choice about testifying.

It is shocking what a defense lawyer can ask of a sexual assault complainant in a Canadian courtroom.

But the prosecution made no objection and perhaps the reasons for staying silent will become clear at some point.

The complainant, her identify protected by a publication ban, recounted her tale of violation earlier in the week, insisting she’d never consented to sex with any of those men after a pub-crawl night and was too weirdly incapacitated — the implication that she’d been drugged, on top of eight alcoholic drinks consumed — to make them stop.

Let’s start small, Black’s accusation that the complainant had “a crush” on Kara, the cop with whom she was most friendly from working together at 51 Division. The cop she’d spoken to briefly earlier that afternoon, telling him: “I’m going to be wearing a really short skirt for easy access.”

Complainant: “It’s not something I did.”

But look at what she was wearing when she joined the “Rookie Buy Night” at 8:45 p.m., at the CC Whiskey Lounge & Bar: A corset under a low-cut top.

“I suggest that you were wearing that to draw the attention of men to you,” said Black.

Complainant: “I disagree with you.”

“I suggest that you went to that party with the hope, with the anticipation that, by the end of the night, you would be in that hotel room having sex with Mr. Kara or Mr. Nyznik or both.”

Complainant: “Absolutely not.”

Moving on to the nearby Pravda Vodka Bar, the woman accompanied Kara outside when he went for a smoke. That’s when he vomited on himself, and purportedly got sick thrice more. So smashed and unsteady that a colleague drove him to the Westin Harbour Castle Hotel. Nyznik had secured a room because the three defendants didn’t want to drive home drunk.

She agreed that she liked Kara, in a friendly way. Black suggested she liked him in another way, “the way a man and a woman like each other.’’

No.

As for Nyznik, the alleged victim had some time previously told a friend, he was “cute,” Black put to the witness.

“What I said was he’s cute until he opens his mouth.”

It was Nyznik, Black claimed, that the woman cozied up to after Kara left, touching him, until he “playfully” swatted away her hand. That was before the group had moved on to the Brass Rail. “You were flirting with him.”

“I disagree.”

At the peeler bar, Black proposed that it was the complainant who, well, complained when Nyznik, pretending the group was an adult film crew up from Miami, suggested to a stripper that she join them at the hotel where they could all have sex together and the complainant could videotape them. Black claimed the alleged victim had whined: “Why do I have to be the one who videotapes. Why can’t I join in?”

Witness: “I know that’s not what I said. At no point in time did I say I wanted to participate.’’

While at times Black appeared to be reading his version of events from a transcript, he never made clear who was being quoted as raconteur. Presumably his client, or maybe all three.

In any event, Black contended that the complainant invited herself back to the hotel room. She has testified she agreed to go there with Nyznik and Cabero, but only to rouse Kara so they could venture out on the town again. It was during the cab ride to the Harbour Castle that, the complainant testified, she began to feel strange — an intense headache and blurry vision.

“You knew (Kara) was in no condition to go out,” said Black. The witness countered that the idea of waking Kara was not hers.

Nor, continued Black, was she feeling ill. “I’m suggesting there was nothing wrong with you. You were not under the influence of alcohol and you weren’t under the influence of anything else.”

Went willingly and eagerly toward a date for multiple-partner sex, Black indicated.

Loading... Loading... Loading... Loading... Loading... Loading...

“You say you were drugged by somebody putting a drug in your drink.”

Witness: “I don’t know . . . . I did not see somebody put something in my drink. So I have no knowledge how it was done.”

But Black was only working himself up to the climax.

Whilst still at the Brass Rail, the complainant, said Black, leaned into Nyznik and said: “I love giving blow-jobs and I am the best . . . . I’m a 10 but because I’ve been drinking, I’d be a 9.5.”

The witness adamantly denied saying any such thing.

Then, according to Black, the woman added she wanted to perform a sexual act with two men simultaneously involving fellatio and intercourse. And it had to be performed over the sleeping Kara’s body. “I absolutely didn’t say that.”

Black continued with his narrative: How, when they got to the room, the woman climbed onto the bed where Kara was flaked out, began rubbing his face and chest. She agreed she’d been on the bed, on all fours, but was calling Kara’s name to wake him.

The witness earlier testified that, as she lay back on the bed, Nyznik dropped his trousers and inserted his penis into her mouth.

In Black’s version, it was the witness who took Nyznik’s penis and put it in her mouth. “You opened the zipper and you took him in your hand and began to perform oral sex, while reaching behind with your hand and rubbing Mr. Kara’s body.”

Witness: “I was not.”

At that juncture, Black hammered on, Cabero emerged from the bathroom and said: “Looks like you’re having a party.”

Black: “You took Mr. Nyznik out of your mouth and smiled.’’

Cabero alleged asked: “Do you mind if I join in?”

Black: “You beckoned (Cabero) closer. You grabbed his pants. You took Mr. Cabero in your mouth and began to perform oral sex on him.’’ Then, “Mr. Cabero said, can I f--- you?”

No, responded the witness. “He said, ‘shall I f--- you in the a--?’ ”

In total, Black claimed, the complained performed oral sex on Nyznik four times, before he was ready to ejaculate.

Black: “Mr. Cabero had vaginal intercourse with you while you were performing fellatio on Mr. Nyznik.”

Witness: “I was being penetrated orally by one person while being penetrated (vaginally) by another person.’’

Kara woke up. According to the witness’ testimony, he told the other two to stop, “she’s out guys, stop.”

But not long afterwards, Kara wanted some, too. “He got on top and started to have sex with you in the missionary position.”

Throughout the cross-examination, the witness remained composed, her facial expression blank. She did not joust with Black. She would not be provoked into tears or anger. She did not look to the Crowns for help.

The trial continues.