Can Dudley Do-Right rescue bank customers from

the new relationship the banksters have established?



"If you were borrowing from Tony Soprano, and he says, 'you can pay me back on Friday,' he wouldn't send guys to collect on Wednesday, which is exactly what they are doing. All I am looking for is for them to live up to their end of the bargain."

-- Chase credit-card customer Peter Meyer, commenting to a NY1 cable-news reporter about the death grip Chase has laid on him and his wife Gail (see the link to the story and clip below)



by Ken

Money

"You just have to Google this issue and you see tons of messages on credit card forums and blogs all about this."



Bigda says with banks experiencing a record number of defaults, lenders are trying to get back as much of their money as they can –- and quickly. The minimum payment hike means the Meyers are essentially being forced to pay off their debt in half the time.

can







# In the banksters' eyes, of course, they are the victims in all this. Do we laugh or cry?

I'm sorry there doesn't seem any way to embed the video clip of this interview by NY1 reporter Tara Lynn Wagner, but I hope you'll click the link below to see it and read the story.Basically, the story is this: Peter and Gail got word from Chase, with which they've had accounts for decades, that come August the minimum payment on their three credit cards is being increased from 2 to 5 percent of the balance. As it happens, they have some $25K of debt split among the three cards, parked there at low interest rates for the duration of the loans. All told, the increase will require them to somehow find an "extra" $800 a month.There is no "extra" $800 a month. They had already cut back all their expenses wherever they could, and, no longer relying on Peter's business, in which they both worked, they have both taken outside jobs. "It might as well be $8,000 or $8 million," Peter told reporter Tara Lynn Wagner. "I literally couldn't find $800. There's just no way. I'm literally doing it from check to check to check and juggling as best we can."One little detail the otherwise-earnest NY1 reporter left out: They didn't get into debt living the high life. They've been putting their kid through college. Justin graduated recently, and starts medical school in the fall. This is personal for me, because I was with Peter the day Justin was born. But the issue isn't just personal. It's happening all over the country, as the banksters put the squeeze to their victims -- er,NY1 reporter Wagner also interviewedmagazine writer Carolyn Bigda.Why are the banksters doing this? Silly question, because they think they. They aren't afraid of getting their money back from Peter and Gail. ("We're always over the minimum," Peter says. "We haven't missed any payments.") If anything, the banks are peeved that they're locked into those low interest rates -- you know, the big promotional rates the banks were shoving down our throats. Now, apparently, it'sfault for taking them at their word. One possibility: If they force Peter and Gail into default on their cards, or offer to renegotiate the balances, they can jack the rates way up.A couple of other local TV stations have expressed interest in Peter and Gail's plight, and that's just here in the NYC are. But clearly this isn't particularly a NYC issue, and it isn't just a Chase issue, though Chase seems to have an especially large number of unhappy customers. (Peter tells me he's found a website for discontented Chase customers and has been in contact with a lawyer already looking into the feasibility of some sort of class-action suit.) Presumably, this is far from the only bankster depradation being practiced with a view to putting the squeeze to customers.Peter recognizes that there are scads of bank customers being hurt even worse than he is, but he is, he says, fighting for his life. He plans to post the NY1 interview on YouTube as soon as gets the DVD of it, and he's looking for all avenues to pursue.When I spoke to him on the phone this morning, he wasn't particularly charmed by the irony of finding an article on the front page of the NYT Business Section chronicling the gazillion-dollar campaign the banks are organizing to push back against the financial consumers' protection legislation currently being crafted in Congress.

Labels: banksters, Money magazine, NY1, Peter Meyer