Centrist Democrats said Thursday they have the votes to block an emergency border funding bill favored by Speaker Nancy Pelosi Nancy PelosiPelosi slams Trump executive order on pre-existing conditions: It 'isn't worth the paper it's signed on' On The Money: Anxious Democrats push for vote on COVID-19 aid | Pelosi, Mnuchin ready to restart talks | Weekly jobless claims increase | Senate treads close to shutdown deadline Trump signs largely symbolic pre-existing conditions order amid lawsuit MORE (D-Calif.) and liberals in the caucus.

The moderate Democrats are wary that the partisan standoff over new language to protect migrant children — language demanded by liberals — will sink negotiations and force vulnerable lawmakers to go home to face voters outraged over the escalating humanitarian crisis on the southern border.

ADVERTISEMENT

Since Wednesday, when the Senate passed a $4.6 billion border bill with overwhelming bipartisan support, swing-district Democrats — a group known as "front-liners" — have joined forces with other moderate lawmakers to press Pelosi and party leaders to bring that legislation to the House floor.

Pelosi has so far refused, siding with the liberal wing of the party in demanding additional language providing for the explicit protection of the migrant children. Democrats had planned to vote on their amended bill Thursday afternoon.

Hours before the vote, however, Rep. Josh Gottheimer Joshua (Josh) GottheimerVulnerable Democrats tell Pelosi COVID-19 compromise 'essential' Centrist House group offers bipartisan COVID-19 relief deal Hillicon Valley: Lawmakers introduce resolution condemning QAnon | US Cyber Command leader vows to 'defend forward' in protecting nation from cyberattacks MORE (D-N.J.), a leader of the bipartisan Problem Solvers Caucus, told Pelosi that's he has rallied enough moderate Democrats to take down the rule on the amended House bill, according to a source familiar with that exchange.



“There’s a feeling we’re going 2 end up with the Senate bill anyway so let’s just get on w/ it,” the source said in a text message to The Hill.

The news was first reported by The Washington Post.

The threatened opposition caused Democratic leaders to yank their rule from the floor, while party leaders huddled in Pelosi's office in search of a path forward.

Pelosi has called for Senate GOP leaders to sit down for conference negotiations in search of a compromise between the competing versions of the emergency border legislation. Yet Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell Addison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellTrump 'no longer angry' at Romney because of Supreme Court stance On The Money: Anxious Democrats push for vote on COVID-19 aid | Pelosi, Mnuchin ready to restart talks | Weekly jobless claims increase | Senate treads close to shutdown deadline The Hill's Campaign Report: Trump faces backlash after not committing to peaceful transition of power MORE (R-Ky.) has refused to do so, insisting the House take up the Senate bill as is.

And an increasing number of moderate Democrats are siding with McConnell.

"Children are suffering at the border and we must act now to stop it. The House should vote to approve the Senate version of the bill that addresses the Central American refugee crisis at the border and helps the kids living in unsafe and unacceptable conditions," tweeted freshman Rep. Ben McAdams (D-Utah).

"The thinking there is that if progressives force us to go home without addressing the border crisis ... that's a real problem," said a senior Democratic aide associated with the moderate wing of the party.

The front-line members are particularly wary of liberal-backed language in the House bill that cuts funding for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement — a provision that could lead to GOP attack ads against vulnerable Democrats.

"That is terrible policy, terrible politics all around for many of these front-line members," the aide said.

Liberals pushing for the additional provisions say the language is necessary to ensure the emergence funds are used by the administration for the safety and care of the migrant children, as Congress intended.

"This is not a controversial or radical idea," said Rep. David Cicilline David Nicola CicillineClark rolls out endorsements in assistant Speaker race Races heat up for House leadership posts The folly of Cicilline's 'Glass-Steagall for Tech' MORE (R.I.), head of the Democrats' messaging arm. "This is about our basic humanity and the responsibility we have for the children who are in our custody."

Undermining the leverage of the liberals, however, the Senate passed its bill on Wednesday with the overwhelming support of 84 lawmakers, including a number of liberal Democrats. An earlier version of the House bill had not fared nearly as well, winning support from just 37 Democrats.

The combination of Senate votes has led to plenty of attacks from liberal House Democrats on Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer Chuck SchumerPelosi slams Trump executive order on pre-existing conditions: It 'isn't worth the paper it's signed on' 3 reasons why Biden is misreading the politics of court packing Cruz blocks amended resolution honoring Ginsburg over language about her dying wish MORE (D-N.Y.), whom the liberals are accusing of failing to keep his troops in line at the expense of the party's leverage in the debate.

"We're toast. Schumer f---ed us," a senior Democratic aide told The Hill by text from inside the meeting in Pelosi's office.

Time is of the essence. The House is slated to leave Washington Thursday for a long July 4 recess, and there seemed to be little appetite among rank-and-file members to stick around for a long-drawn fight over the border money.

"It's over," said the senior Democratic aide. "The Senate passed a bipartisan bill. These guys want to get out of town."

Updated: 2:29 p.m.