President Obama Can See Russia From His House…

Someone, anyone, please tell me the best play for the Obama administration is not to trot out Clapper and Brennan to blame the Russians…. because the entrenched unwillingness to accept defeat is now getting way too funny.

The latest batch of moonbattery stems from the New York Times and Washington Post who are now quoting mysterious and secret sources, within the CIA, who claim the Russians were involved in the 2016 presidential election… or something:

[…] It is the assessment of the intelligence community that Russia’s goal here was to favor one candidate over the other, to help Trump get elected,” the paper quoted a senior US official as saying. “That’s the consensus view.” (link)

It was already funny when candidate Hillary “pickles” Clinton was blaming a mysterious planetary conspiracy theory created by earth’s nationalist movement under the auspices of oppositional frog memes:

[…] The “vast right-wing conspiracy” went weirdly global today when Hillary Clinton delivered an actual presidential speech claiming she was being chased around by looming global forces of darkness, aligned in ideological intent to ensure her destruction (link)



But, it’s yet another level of absurdity entirely when the actual U.S. intelligence apparatus assigns the official position office of the president to the same global conspiracy.

These people don’t need to be refuted, they need to be laughed at. Period.

Without any delivered evidence what-so-ever, the Times and Post are selling the deflective White House/Democrat “blame Russia” narrative by pointing to intelligence agencies including the Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper – and the Director of the CIA John Brennan.

Pause yourself for a moment and absorb that.

DNI Director James Clapper, the specific Obama political appointee who falsely testified before congress about the NSA – and then when caught in the falsehoods fell back on a position to say:

“I responded in what I thought was the most truthful, or least untruthful, manner by saying ‘no.’” (link)

Yeah, THAT James Clapper. Oh, there’s no political angle to that guy’s department now that he’s nearing administrative exit and throwing the proverbial distraction spaghetti upon the wall.. can’t be. LOL.

But, but wait… The CIA haz ruskie reports too.

Well, specifically that would be the Obama political appointee and CIA Director, John Brennan; and there would be intense irony in Brennan saying they have some mysterious and top secret evidence of Russian hacking.

Irony, because it was literally John Brennan’s firm who was caught in 2008 ACTUALLY hacking the U.S. State Department passport records of then presidential candidate Senator Barack Obama who Brennan was working for:

[…] Just two weeks before an April 2008 Obama speech, and surprise announcement of his 1981 visit to Pakistan, employees of John Brennan (who would become Obama’s terror chief) were caught tampering with Obama’s passport files. It should be noted that “Obama’s top terrorism and intelligence adviser, John O. Brennan, heads a firm that was cited in March 2008 (just before this April ’08 fundraiser) for breaching sensitive files in the State Department’s passport office, according to a State Department Inspector General’s report released July 2009. (link)

The same CIA Director John Brennan who admitted in September of this year, that he voted for the communist party. This long-term Obama adviser, now CIA head would never have a political motivation to assign a ridiculous political angle to the 2016 Presidential outcome in an effort to protect the legacy of, well, his boss… right?

Muh, Russians.

Swear.

You just can’t make this stuff up. And yet, the MSM wonders why trust in media is even lower than trust in government. Dammit, it’s that Pepe character, gottabe.

Looks like there's inter-agency leaking and counter-leaking going on, which resulted in the latest Russia non-story https://t.co/WYIf8Sbd82 — Michael Tracey (@mtracey) December 10, 2016

Back to the grown ups – We have previously presented the outline of black hats and white hats within the various domestic law enforcement and national security discussions. However, seemingly invisible to all but those who are paying very close attention, is the dawning of a new security era focused on civic defense and national restoration.

The larger dose of joy comes not from waiting for the historic writing of this time; but rather to notice these exact moments when we are within them.

With General Mattis as Secretary of Defense, Michael Flynn as National Security Advisor, General John Kelly as Secretary of Homeland Security, a top-of-class West Point graduate in Mike Pompeo brought in to take over and undoubtedly purge the CIA, and a lame duck struggle breaking out over NSA with Admiral Mike Rogers, the implications are pretty obvious.

[L-R Mike Pompeo, Gen. Michael Flynn, Admiral Mike Rogers]

The white hats we have needed within the national security and intelligence departments are responding from a select group within the Defense Department.

Mounting evidence supports the ongoing thesis the DoD has actually seceded from the political elites; and with the election of President Donald Trump, they are poised on the horizon to reconstruct a nationalist-minded defense and security apparatus. This is the fundamental paradigm shift many have discussed, yet few imagined possible.

Is it any wonder President-elect Trump is less than enthusiastic with intelligence briefings from “blame Russia” intel officials stemming from within the current administration?

Seriously, think about it.

Lest, we too soon forget – from September 2015:

More than 50 intelligence analysts working out of the U.S. military’s Central Command have formally complained that their reports on ISIS and al Qaeda’s branch in Syria were being inappropriately altered by senior officials, The Daily Beast has learned. The complaints spurred the Pentagon’s inspector general to open an investigation into the alleged manipulation of intelligence. The fact that so many people complained suggests there are deep-rooted, systemic problems in how the U.S. military command charged with the war against the self-proclaimed Islamic State assesses intelligence. “The cancer was within the senior level of the intelligence command,” one defense official said. (read more)

Any questions?