Temporary court order criticised for shielding officers’ identities but it’s unclear how media will be affected

This article is more than 10 months old

This article is more than 10 months old

A Hong Kong court has banned people from publishing a wide range of personal details about police officers and their families, including photos, in a bid to halt “doxxing” by pro-democracy protesters.

The temporary injunction, uploaded on government websites on Friday night, has been criticised for its broad wording and for further shielding the identity of officers as they clash with protesters.

Hong Kong has been battered by nearly five months of pro-democracy rallies in which police and protesters have fought increasingly violent battles.

'Society is suffering': Hong Kong protests spark mental health crisis Read more

The police force says many of its officers have had personal details leaked online – known as “doxxing” – and family members harassed as a result.

Lawyers for the force went to Hong Kong’s high court on Friday asking for an injunction forbidding people from publishing personal information including key details such as names, addresses, dates of birth and identity card numbers.

But they also sought a ban on publishing details about a police officer’s Facebook and Instagram IDs, their car number plates and any photograph of an officer or their family without consent.

The court granted the injunction for 14 days pending a longer legal hearing.

The injunction also bans “intimidating, molesting, harassing, threatening, pestering or interfering” with any police officer or family member.

Superintendent Swalikh Mohammed of the Cyber Security and Technology Crime Bureau, who attended the hearing, told the South China Morning post that the media would not be restricted under the injunction.

However, the current wording leaves no exceptions making it unclear how it will be applied and whether it will restrict work by reporters.

Police did not respond to requests for clarification.

Antony Dapiran, a lawyer who has written a book about the city’s protest movement, described the ban as a “very alarming development”.

Hong Kong protests are at 'life-threatening level', say police Read more

“(It’s a) serious restriction on freedom of expression and effectively criminalises a whole range of perfectly lawful acts which will now be punishable as contempt of court,” he wrote on Twitter.

The Hong Kong Journalists Association said it was “extremely concerned” about the potential limitations to media freedoms and said it was seeking legal advice.

Hong Kong’s police have already faced criticism for hiding their identities during clashes by removing warrant card numbers from their uniforms, as well as using face masks and shining bright torches at reporters.

Earlier this month the city’s pro-Beijing leader, Carrie Lam, used a colonial-era emergency law to ban protesters from wearing face masks.

But the ordinance was widely flouted by protesters incensed that police are still allowed to cover their faces.

Police say that they are facing unprecedented levels of public anger and abuse and need to protect their staff from retribution and harassment.

Pro-Beijing lawmakers defended the injunction.

It comes before Hong Kong medical workers planned a rally in the heart of the city’s financial centre on Saturday, angry at perceived police brutality during the protests.

Police have responded with increasing amounts of rubber bullets, tear gas and even live rounds in recent clashes.