(Rana Ayyub is an award-winning investigative journalist and political writer. She is working on a book on Prime Minister Narendra Modi which will be published later this year.)

In the last one week, India has seen a ban on a documentary called 'India's Daughter'. The government says this is needed to project an appropriately evolving image of India.



At a time when a maze of social and political issues combined with an atmosphere of cynicism surround a government that seems to have done little to distance itself from the lunacy of fringe elements, comes an evil that seeks the immediate attention of the Home Minister and the government of the day - a film that has apparently shown Indian attitudes that must not be exposed.



Prime Minister Modi during his tenure as Chief Minister of Gujarat had highlighted his work for the girl child as one of its major achievements. Ironically, according to a newspaper report today, there has been a 500 per cent increase in rapes of Dalit women in Gujarat.

Similarly, the Madhya Pradesh government led by Shivraj Singh Chouhan has projects lined up for the girl child which are made public in every interview and played up before elections. In its manifesto for the 2014 general elections and in television ad campaigns, the BJP had expressed its disgust over the fact that every parent in India with a working girl or a school-going girl shares the concern over whether she will return safely home each day.



The advert was pegged around one of the most highlighted and brutal rape cases in India, that of Nirbhaya, who was raped and murdered by a bunch of men in a Delhi bus while she was returning home with a friend in December 2012. The case shook the conscience of a nation with the grotesque act and the rapists' hatred for a resilient woman (expressed in the documentary we cannot be allowed to watch).



For Nirbhaya's family, subjected to constant media glare and amid their own grief and pain for the daughter killed in such an inhuman manner, the approval for the film to be telecast speaks volumes of their progressive mindset.



Many like me may have issues with what we see as a shoddy attempt by the documentarian in putting together incoherent pieces which do not seem to do much justice to the plight of Nirbhaya or many other women like her in India or across the globe. But for the central government to call it an attack on India's international image and a political conspiracy smells of a hypocrisy which the government might not wish to concede.



Within days of ordering an absolute ban on the telecast of the film and asking for it to be removed online, the Home Minister of India, Rajnath Singh, remained a mute spectator when a mob of armed civilians attacked a man accused of rape in a jail in Dimapur, Nagaland. The victim, Syed Sarif Uddin Khan, a small-time used car dealer, was lynched by a mob, his blood-ridden body was put on display as crowds took selfies and pictures.



It was alleged that Khan had raped a tribal girl from a nearby village and that he was a Bangladeshi immigrant (an accusation faced by most of the Muslim population residing in the North East). According to a newspaper report, jail authorities let the protesters inspect the crowded cells so that they could identify the accused and unleash their savagery.



While Rajnath Singh sought an explanation from British filmmaker Leslee Udwin about her access to the accused in Tihar Jail, his officials shocked democracy by allowing mob mis-justice towards a man in Dimapur, charges against whom are proving to be flimsy.





Not just has the Chief Minister of Assam Tarun Gogoi stated that there seems to have been no rape, it is now established that Khan was an Indian national. Not just an Indian national, the Home Minister would want to know that his family served the Indian Army in various capacities.His eldest brother died while fighting the Kargil war, whereas his two brothers Syed Jamal Uddin Khan, and Syed Kamal Khan are now with the Assam regiment. Their father, Syed Hussain Khan, served and retired from the Military Engineering Service (MES).The Superintendent of Police of the area, Bibekananda Das, has stated that he would not rule out the involvement of Naga militant outfits as the cops have recovered an AK-47 rifle magazine, 30 rounds of live ammunition and empty cartridges from the spot. Some allege that the attack was a premeditated and planned affair to stoke ethnic tension in the state. While speaking to NDTV, the victim's brother Jamal Khan said, "Is the Nagaland government running a jungle raj? The girl who filed the rape complaint was my brother's wife's cousin. Nagaland police have said that medical reports say she was not raped."So while a BBC documentary allegedly put India at risk, the brazen killing of the member of a family of armymen who protect the country day and night adorned India's hall of fame. While the government was quick to ban and remove every trace of the film, photographs of the naked corpse of Syed Sarif Uddin Khan with the crowd is still doing the rounds. While a curfew was put in place much later, Nagaland state police officials issued no statement stating that the accused was not a Bangladeshi national, a rumour that surged across the country.The alacrity with which the Information and Broadcasting ministry issued a statement on Indian culture while asking for a ban on the film was nowhere on display in Dimapur. It took a day for the information to go down in the public domain that an Indian civilian, not a Bangladeshi, was subjected to savagery rarely seen before.It took two days for the state Home Department to cast doubts on the allegations of rape and it is yet to be ascertained how a mob of hundreds came together to plan and execute a murder with such precision.

Whether the victim was rightly accused or not, will the government not want to tell its people if he deserved to die in this manner? And if he was innocent, as is now being disclosed, why were his family and he subjected to slander and a fatal assault?Yes, the Indian Parliament last week was shocked and hurt with the film as suggested by the Home Minister on the floor of the House. But Mr Minister, where is the hurt and shock at Dimapur? Is there pride in the public lynching of a man who could well be an innocent son of India?

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed within this article are the personal opinions of the author. NDTV is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, suitability, or validity of any information on this article. All information is provided on an as-is basis. The information, facts or opinions appearing in the article do not reflect the views of NDTV and NDTV does not assume any responsibility or liability for the same.