This document defines an API that web page authors can use to cooperatively schedule background tasks such that they do not introduce delays to other high priority tasks that share the same event loop, such as input processing, animations and frame compositing. The user agent is in a better position to determine when background tasks can be run without introducing user-perceptible delays or jank in animations and input response, based on its knowledge of currently scheduled tasks, vsync deadlines, user-interaction and so on. Using this API should therefore result in more appropriate scheduling of background tasks during times when the browser would otherwise be idle.

The Web Performance Working Group maintains a test suite for the specification. Please see the Working Group's implementation report . Vendors interested in implementing this document SHOULD join the mailing lists below and take part in the discussions.

The API described in this document allows script authors to request the user-agent to schedule a callback when it would otherwise be idle. The user agent provides an estimation of how long it expects to remain idle as a deadline passed to the callback. The page author can use the deadline to ensure that these background tasks don't impact latency-critical events such as animation and input response.

A disadvantage of this approach is that the author of the script has no way to inform the user-agent as to whether a given setTimeout callback is time-critical or could be delayed until the browser is otherwise idle. In addition, the user agent isn't able to provide the callback with any information about how long it can continue to execute without delaying time-critical operations and causing jank or other user-perceptible delays. As a result, the easiest way forward is for the author is to simply call setTimeout with a very small value, and then execute the minimum possible chunk of work in the resulting callback and reschedule additional work with another call to setTimeout . This is less than optimal because there is extra overhead from having to post many small tasks on the user agent's event loop and schedule their execution. It also relies on the user-agent interleaving other time-critical work between each of these callbacks appropriately, which is difficult since the user-agent can't make accurate assumptions on how long each of these callbacks are likely to take.

Web pages often want to execute computation tasks on the browser's event loop which are not time-critical, but might take a significant portion of time to perform. Examples of such background tasks include recording analytics data, long running data processing operations, client-side templating and pre-rendering of content likely to become visible in the near future. These tasks must share the event loop with other time-critical operations, such as reacting to input and performing script-based animations using requestAnimationFrame . These background tasks are typically performed by scheduling a callback using setTimeout and running the background task during that callback.

Idle Periods

After input processing, rendering and compositing for a given frame has been completed, the user agent's main thread often becomes idle until either: the next frame begins; another pending task becomes eligible to run; or user input is received. This specification provides a means to schedule execution of callbacks during this otherwise idle time via a requestIdleCallback API.

Callbacks posted via the requestIdleCallback API become eligible to run during user agent defined idle periods. When an idle callback is run it will be given a deadline which corresponds to the end of the current idle period. The decision as to what constitutes an idle period is user agent defined, however the expectation is that they occur in periods of quiescence where the browser expects to be idle.

One example of an idle period is the time between committing a given frame to the screen and starting processing on the next frame during active animations, as shown in . Such idle periods will occur frequently during active animations and screen updates, but will typically be very short (i.e., less than 16ms for devices with a 60Hz vsync cycle).

Example of an inter-frame idle period

The web-developer should be careful to account for all work performed by operations during an idle callback. Some operations, such as resolving a promise or triggering a page layout, may cause subsequent tasks to be scheduled to run after the idle callback has finished. In such cases, the application should account for this additional work by yielding before the deadline expires to allow these operations to be performed before the next frame deadline.

Another example of an idle period is when the user agent is idle with no screen updates occurring. In such a situation the user agent may have no upcoming tasks with which it can bound the end of the idle period. In order to avoid causing user-perceptible delays in unpredictable tasks, such as processing of user input, the length of these idle periods should be capped to a maximum value of 50ms. Once an idle period is finished the user agent can schedule another idle period if it remains idle, as shown in , to enable background work to continue to occur over longer idle time periods.

Example of an idle period when there are no pending frame updates

During an idle period the user agent will run idle callbacks in FIFO order until either the idle period ends or there are no more idle callbacks eligible to be run. As such, the user agent will not necessarily run all currently posted idle callbacks within a single idle period. Any remaining idle tasks are eligible to run during the next idle period.

To deliver the best performance developers are encouraged to eliminate unnecessary callbacks (e.g. requestAnimationFrame, setTimeout, and so on) that do not perform meaningful work; do not keep such callbacks firing and waiting for events to react, instead schedule them as necessary to react to events once they become available. Such pattern improves overall efficiency, and enables the user agent to schedule long idle callbacks (up to 50ms) that can be used to efficiently perform large blocks of background work.

Only idle tasks which posted before the start of the current idle period are eligible to be run during the current idle period. As a result, if an idle callback posts another callback using requestIdleCallback , this subsequent callback won't be run during the current idle period. This enables idle callbacks to re-post themselves to be run in a future idle period if they cannot complete their work by a given deadline - i.e., allowing code patterns like the following example, without causing the callback to be repeatedly executed during a too-short idle period:

function doWork(deadline) { if (deadline.timeRemaining() <= 5) { // This will take more than 5ms so wait until we // get called back with a long enough deadline. requestIdleCallback(doWork); return; } // do work... }

At the start of the next idle period newly posted idle callbacks are appended to the end of the runnable idle callback list, thus ensuring that reposting callbacks will be run round-robin style, with each callback getting a chance to be run before that of an earlier task's reposted callback.

Future versions of this specification could allow other scheduling strategies. For example, schedule idle callback within the same idle period, a period that has at least X milliseconds of idle time, and so on. Current specification only supports the case for scheduling into the next idle period, at which time the callback can execute its logic, or repost itself into the next idle period.

When the user agent determines that the web page is not user visible it can throttle idle periods to reduce the power usage of the device, for example, only triggering an idle period every 10 seconds rather than continuously.

A final subtlety to note is that there is no guarantee that a user agent will have any idle CPU time available during heavy page load. As such, it is entirely acceptable that the user agent does not schedule any idle period, which would result in the idle callbacks posted via the requestIdleCallback API being postponed for a potentially unbounded amount of time. For cases where the author prefers to execute the callback within an idle period, but requires a time bound within which it can be executed, the author can provide the timeout property in the options argument to requestIdleCallback : if the specified timeout is reached before the callback is executed within an idle period, a task is queued to execute it.

The maximum deadline of 50ms is derived from studies [[!RESPONSETIME]] which show that that a response to user input within 100ms is generally perceived as instantaneous to humans. Capping idle deadlines to 50ms means that even if the user input occurs immediately after the idle task has begun, the user agent still has a remaining 50ms in which to respond to the user input without producing user perceptible lag.