Eric Striker

Daily Stormer

May 10, 2017

A new study from the University of Kansas is claiming that people who defend the right to have an opinion Jews don’t like (referred to by the short-hand “politically incorrect”) are actually racist by association.

It isn’t clear if the lead researcher Mark H. White is a Jew, but he might be. While this is obviously a trick intended to browbeat the “center-right” into letting Jews fully overturn the First Amendment, there may be some truth to it. The only opinions you’re not allowed to have are ones that are true, such as that blacks as a group are savages incompatible with Western civilization and Jews are mustering all their power to wipe us off the face of the earth.

While news publications like the The Daily Stormer are attacked by the marginalized Judenpresse elites as “fringe,” millions of people secretly agree with our editorial line. They are just scared to give their opinion in public.

The University of Kansas:

Two researchers at the University of Kansas have conducted a study suggesting that “explicit racial prejudice is a reliable predictor of the ‘free speech defense’ of racist expression.” The paper authored by Mark H. White, a graduate student in psychology, and Christian Crandall, professor of psychology, appears online currently in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.



“When people make appeals to democratic principles — like ‘freedom of speech’ — they don’t always represent a genuine interest in that principle,” White said. “We think of principles as ideas we use to guide behavior in our everyday lives. Our data show something different — that we tend to make up our mind on something based on our attitudes — in this case, racial attitudes — and then decide that the principle is relevant or irrelevant. People do whatever best fits their pre-existing attitudes.” “We look at people who defend another’s racist speech — for example, defending someone who got fired for going into a racist rant at work — with a ‘free speech’ argument,” Crandall said. “What do we know about people making this argument? The correlation between using the free speech defense and people’s own racial prejudice is pretty high. It’s racists defending racists.” Indeed, the new study reveals a positive correlation (Pearson r = .43) between having racial prejudice and defending racist speech using the “free speech argument” — a stronger correlation than the researchers expected. White and Crandall recruited hundreds of participants via the Amazon Mechanical Turk service, conducting several interrelated studies where participants responded to descriptions of recent news events or readings involving someone being punished for racist speech. The racial attitudes of the respondents themselves were gauged using the Henry and Sears Symbolic Racism 2000 scale, a standard measure of racial prejudice in social psychology and political science. One finding suggests many who defend racist speech using the “free speech argument” might not extend the same principle of free speech to negative comments aimed at authority figures or the public in general.

So this is the new discourse the system is trying to force into the mainstream. It’s been a long-time coming, but a number of surprising political developments have set these forces back. For example, these same Jewish “educational” institutions have been priming young people to physically attack people engaging in free speech Jews don’t agree with, e.g., “Antifa.” They were predicting a more subdued, Hillary Clinton America in 2017. Because they jumped the gun too fast, the establishment’s Leftist attack dogs are encountering fierce resistance.

Nobody believes the Anti-Defamation League or Southern Poverty Law Center when they say they like the First Amendment – the sole reason they exist is to restrict the First Amendment. They have developed a system of private, litigation and threat-based censorship to circumvent this barrier, but as the dissidents grow more savvy, they are going to renew their campaigns to pass European Union style hate speech laws the first chance they get.

Expect Bill Nye to soon start reminding you of this “settled science” right after he’s done judging a transgender ping-pong show.