“

This really reads as someone who doesn't use the harasser. If thats not true then ask yourself why.

Like you think AA harasser is overpowered. How many do you even see doing that? been using the harasser primarily since 2014 and Ive seen a Dozen? Perhaps a few more buster maxes in the rumble seat.

Ok you can do a million miles an hour dodging tankbuster rounds like a pro while firing the ranger with ease. But people still pick the skyguard. Why do you think this is?.

Wouldn't this apply to the Ant as well? It would be even better given its ability and durability? The damn thing almost moves as fast and you cant flip really going over crazy terrain. Why don't we see roving bands of AA Ants?



Also a Lightning can also beat a poorly driven MBT. So can Infantry. So can the damn bumps at the side of the road. Why are you basing balancing decisions on the ability of the lower common denominator of tank drivers? I can beat them on foot.

Also do I really need to point out that a dune buggy with Anti tank weapons shouldn't be on the level of ATV with a machinegun? Like what are you trying to say?

Its too cheap to buy at the terminal I guess.

So what? What does that have to do with effectiveness? Tank mines are to cheap as well?

Unless the harasser is over 300 you'll live so long you you wont ever have a problem pulling them rapidly after death. When you lose a battle in a harasser you'll tend to get away anyways.



So does this whole problem boil down to you think the harasser is too spamable?

Would the status quo be fine it cost more?

”