Mike Pompeo Michael (Mike) Richard PompeoOvernight Defense: Pentagon redirects pandemic funding to defense contractors | US planning for full Afghanistan withdrawal by May | Anti-Trump GOP group puts ads in military papers Overnight Defense: House Democrats unveil stopgap spending measure to GOP opposition | Bill includes .6B for new subs | Trump issues Iran sanctions after world shrugs at US action at UN Navalny calls on Russia to return clothes he was wearing when he fell ill MORE secretly travelled to Pyongyang to meet North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un and engage in high-stakes diplomacy. Now Democrats must think twice about trying to stop his nomination to be secretary of State.

By all accounts, Pompeo, who still serves as CIA director, made progress in arranging a summit between Kim and Trump later this spring. The development undercuts the latest false narrative by the anti-Trump chorus in Washington, which had begun to cast doubts on whether the summit was real. Pompeo made progress on thorny groundwork issues like location and agenda for this first-ever meeting between American and North Korean leaders, which hopefully will lead to a less dangerous world.

ADVERTISEMENT

Kim would not have received Pompeo unless he was convinced that he spoke authoritatively for Trump. Indeed, Trump’s willingness to send Pompeo shows how much he trusts the former congressman and West Point graduate, who has briefed him on intelligence matters throughout his presidency. The two men see eye to eye on achieving peace through strength — and Kim’s willingness to talk emerged only after a year of steady U.S.-led military, diplomatic, and economic pressure on Pyongyang. However, the two men also prioritize diplomacy over military intervention, as evidenced by the Trump’s wiliness to engage in unprecedented personal diplomacy with Kim.

Trump secretary of State nominee secretly met with Kim Jong Un: report https://t.co/aOa9gvYlVG pic.twitter.com/smtUQ7XO2H — The Hill (@thehill) April 18, 2018

One would think these diplomatic instincts would be welcome in the Senate, where, throughout U.S. history, secretaries of State have routinely been confirmed with overwhelming votes. Republicans didn’t care much for Hillary Clinton Hillary Diane Rodham ClintonButtigieg stands in as Pence for Harris's debate practice Senate GOP sees early Supreme Court vote as political booster shot Poll: 51 percent of voters want to abolish the electoral college MORE or John Kerry John Forbes KerryThe Memo: Warning signs flash for Trump on debates Divided country, divided church TV ads favored Biden 2-1 in past month MORE, but they still joined bipartisan votes of 94-2 and 94-3, respectively, in favor of their confirmations during the Obama years. Presumably, the senators thought even a president of the other party deserved the cabinet of his choice provided nominees weren’t radically mismatched. Even amid the intense furor over the Iraq War, 32 Democrats voted to confirm Condoleezza Rice as chief diplomat during the second Bush term with only 13 Democrats opposed.

Who could have guessed those acrimonious times would look congenial and bipartisan in retrospect? Today’s Democrats, apparently as part of their self-styled “resistance” to a duly-elected president, are contemplating a uniform vote against Pompeo in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, where Republicans have only a one-vote margin. Since they may be joined by Sen. Rand Paul Randal (Rand) Howard PaulSecond GOP senator to quarantine after exposure to coronavirus GOP senator to quarantine after coronavirus exposure The Hill's Morning Report - Sponsored by National Industries for the Blind - Trump seeks to flip 'Rage' narrative; Dems block COVID-19 bill MORE (R-Ky.), Pompeo could hit the Senate floor with an unprecedented negative committee vote.

If Paul remains a “no” and with Sen. John McCain John Sidney McCainCindy McCain endorses Biden: He's only candidate 'who stands up for our values' Biden says Cindy McCain will endorse him Biden's six best bets in 2016 Trump states MORE (R-Ariz.) out receiving cancer treatment, Pompeo will need at least one Democrat to vote yes on the floor to be confirmed.

Graham says Pompeo will be confirmed as secretary of State despite growing number of Dems opposing nomination https://t.co/38YXBZMWL9 pic.twitter.com/kzZVnrbNsQ — The Hill (@thehill) April 16, 2018

It’s a disgrace that there aren’t dozens willing to offer support. Some 14 Senate Democrats previously voted in favor of Pompeo for director of the CIA, where frankly one can do much more damage than at the State Department. Even liberal Sen. Tim Kaine Timothy (Tim) Michael KaineButtigieg stands in as Pence for Harris's debate practice Trump meets with potential Supreme Court pick Amy Coney Barrett at White House Names to watch as Trump picks Ginsburg replacement on Supreme Court MORE (D-Va.) voted for Pompeo at that time. But on Sunday, Kaine declared his opposition, pathetically explaining his flip-flop: “We have a president who is anti-diplomacy and I worry that Mike Pompeo has shown the same tendency to oppose diplomacy.” Don’t tell that to Kim Jong Un.

By essentially all accounts, Pompeo performed extremely well as CIA director, managing and reforming that sprawling bureaucracy and helping to defeat ISIS, among other accomplishments. Now he’s shown himself to be adept at tough diplomacy even without the title and trappings of being secretary of State.

Democratic opposition to Pompeo clearly has nothing to do with his with his qualifications, views, or track record. Are they ready to explain to voters this November why they put anti-Trump rage ahead of diplomacy and their country’s national security?