By Nate Howard

When I read that Australia had become the first country in the world to ban incandescent bulbs I had two thoughts. First, I said to myself, "This is a great step in the right direction for the fight against global warming." And second, I asked myself, how come Australia was able to pass a law like this without a massive public outcry?



To help answer this question I decided to look into replacing all of the light bulbs in my house with compact fluorescent bulbs for a hefty fee of roughly $100. But what would I really be doing? Aside from the environmental benefits of compact fluorescent bulbs and playing a part in preventing global warming, will I benefit from switching all of my bulbs? And if so, how? Will I save any money? Will I be able to recuperate the money I spent?



Well, the answer is a resounding "YES!"



One bulb = $2.49 + tax

Energy Use = 15 watts = 60 watt incandescent light bulb light output

One year saving for one bulb averaging three hours of use = $12

Average Life of Bulb = 7 years at three hours of use per day

Nate Would Replace 30 Bulbs

Nate's Pre-Replacement Energy Use = 1,800 watts

Nate's Post-Replacement Energy Use = 450 watts

Nate's Savings Per Year = $360

Nate's Savings Over the Life Time of the Bulbs = $2,520



With this analysis, Australia's decision to outlaw incandescent makes perfect sense. The government is able to play a part in preventing global warming, and the citizens actually will recuperate their expenses and attain additional savings by switching.



This seems pretty reasonable right? So why can't we do it?







Share on Facebook