buildzoid You do realize that the FX 63XX and 83XX lines beats Phenoms in games and benchmarks (Including SCII which is most single threaded game ever made)

Google Translate:Benchmark results of AMD on the Internet " Kaveri " chips are being discussed, which have appeared on the Bench portal of Sisofts Sandra . The test results are less interesting than the output hardware configuration :If the information is correct , it would " Kaveri " remarkable about 13 Compute Units ( CUs ) - which corresponds to 832 shader - can have and would thus view of computing power between a Radeon HD 7770 (10 CUs/640 shader) and a Radeon HD 7790 ( 14 CUs / 896 shaders) .Overview of graphics performance makes this because of the much lower memory bandwidth (128-bit DDR3 on socket FM2 + vs. 128 -bit GDDR5 on the graphics card ) , which is about a quarter , not much sense. However, the pure computing power with GPGPU beats by eg OpenCL benchmarks. In SiSoft achieved a " Kaveri " in an encryption test thus more than twice the power of a "rich country " A10- 6800K with the Radeon HD 8670D GPU called internal :The GPU of the " Kaveri " overclocked but with only 600 MHz and accesses DDR3 -1600, while the A10- 6800K system is clocked at 844 MHz and DDR3 -2133 features . The strong growth in terms of GPU later versions with DDR4 would also be declared .This system scored only 5.8 GB / s, which is exactly the ratio 8/13 to 9.4 GB / s of the 13- CU system. Thus, one would have a strong indication for the 13 CUs . A 100% security but there is not natural. Maybe it was only in May of any performance robbing bug is now fixed , but the CUs are now read wrong. Up to the Windows version ( Windows 7 / Windows 8) and a slightly different version of Sandra ( 19:35 / 19:44 ) the configuration are identical. The same user also has an A10- 5800K system, in which also the graphics part only runs at 600 MHz. This system achieved the benchmark only 2.6 GB / s, which is even less than a third of the putative 13 -CU- Kaveri .A closer look at the Sandra results , we noticed that when the system information 1 device is shown with 2 threads. This is strange because usually far - even for large cards - only one thread per device is specified . 2 threads there is only Crossfire setups then 2 devices . However, we can not say exactly how a possible linkage of " Kaveri " and " Hainan" GPU ( 5 CUs have the chance ) would be in the system at the moment. In previous hybrid CrossFire setups are indeed always called both crisps and displayed by Sandra , but this could change due to technical reasons (HSA ) or simple marketing considerations ( AMD's new naming scheme) . Coupling of 8 " Kaveri " CUs and 5 " Hainan" CUs would naturally explain the increased benchmark .The other benchmarks are unspectacular , the measured 15 GB / s memory bandwidth with expectations higher than its predecessor . According to the leaked inside information Kaveri will indeed have an internal 256 -bit bus per module , so that one could expect a higher single-thread memory throughput. Interesting perhaps is that the graphics unit is described as "AMD Radeon R5 M200 Series" :Because of the sloping number of 13 CUs of course also raises the question to what extent it might not be a read error . Conveniently, the same encryption result a user has already uploaded but in May , which ran on a " Kaveri " with the expected 8 CUs/512 shader according to system info:But to be fair in some apps "beat" translates into a small boost.