“The chief certainly sees the value in it. We have to just make sure the practicality in potentially enforcing something like this doesn’t lend itself to dangerous situations for our officers and that’s my primary concern and his primary concern as well. It’s clear to the chief, I’ll let the chief speak for himself, but it’s clear to the chief that if you have individuals who are suffering, or in some state of crisis that they ought not to have firearms. That’s a pretty simple issue,” Benjamin said.