Kim Goldman, the sister of murder victim Ron Goldman, had a Thanksgiving Twitter war with O.J. Simpson’s current attorney. In it, the attorney, Malcolm LaVergne, accused father Fred Goldman of being a “plantation master” who condones “slavery” against Simpson in an attempt to collect “blood money.” LaVergne also renewed attacks on the Goldmans, generally, whom he called “greedy.”

A jury acquitted O.J. Simpson of criminal charges in 1995 that he killed Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown Simpson, but Simpson was later found civilly liable in 1997 for Goldman’s death. The Goldman family has been seeking to recover a judgement against Simpson since then. Simpson moved his assets to Florida, presumably to take advantage of that state’s homestead exemption, which protects personal property from creditors. The homestead exemption there is rooted in the Florida constitution, making the protection notoriously secure.

The Twitter war started a few days ago when Las Vegas attorney Malcolm LaVergne, who was seated by Simpson’s side as he successfully gained parole over an unrelated Nevada crime, tweeted the following: “Money money money money. I’ve heard the Greedy Goldmans talk about money a thousand times since they came on my radar screen in July, but only heard them mention that poor, dead kid Ron a few times. Go figure.”

Money money money money. I’ve heard the Greedy Goldmans talk about money a thousand times since they came on my radar screen in July, but only heard them mention that poor, dead kid Ron a few times. Go figure. M. https://t.co/TNtscKT5S3 — Malcolm LaVergne (@SinCityAttorney) November 21, 2017

He also levied the charge that the Goldmans are “professional, public figure, victims.”

Those who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones. The Goldmans are professional, public figure, victims. They invite criticism with their media tactics. Do you see me criticizing Sharon Rufo or the Browns? No! Think what you want. M. https://t.co/JRDPmFWNFD — Malcolm LaVergne (@SinCityAttorney) November 21, 2017

It continued on: “The Goldmans of 1994 through circa 2005-6, are not the Goldmans of today. The Goldmans I’ve dealt with since July are bullies, make threats, and look for any and every opportunity to monetize this entirely bizarre situation.”

Everything else. Everything else. The Goldmans of 1994 through circa 2005-6, are not the Goldmans of today. The Goldmans I’ve dealt with since July are bullies, make threats, and look for any and every opportunity to monetize this entirely bizarre situation. M. — Malcolm LaVergne (@SinCityAttorney) November 22, 2017

LaVergne further accused Goldman estate lawyer David Cook of not “showing up” to a hearing. He also said the Goldmans were “filing multiple frivolous motions to drive up attorney’s fees . . . promote books and get speaking fees,” tactics which he called a “disgrace.”

Cook requested an emergency hearing last week in California and didn’t bother showing up to it. Did Simpson’s legal team run to the media and complain? No. Now Goldmans don’t get what they want in court, and it’s on TMZ. Policy remains the same, Goldmans in media, I’ll comment. — Malcolm LaVergne (@SinCityAttorney) November 22, 2017

They just keep filing multiple frivolous motions to drive up attorney’s fees and stay in the media for publicity, promote books and get speaking fees etc. disgrace. M. — Malcolm LaVergne (@SinCityAttorney) November 21, 2017

A few Twitter followers shot back at LaVergne and said the Goldmans should have every right to collect what they’re owed. LaVergne said he understood that the “[c]ivil judgment is valid” and that “[c]ollection methods for the blood money are valid,” but that the Goldmans wanted too much “media attention”:

Melanie, no point. Civil judgment is valid. Collection methods for the blood money are valid. My issue is that they’re professional, public figure, victims. Goldmans want all the media attention to promote books and get paid to the exclusion of other victims’ families. M. — Malcolm LaVergne (@SinCityAttorney) November 23, 2017

Enter Law&Crime Founder Dan Abrams, who covered the original O.J. Simpson murder trial, who jumped into the fray a few days ago by questioning whether LaVergne’s comment carried anti-semetic undertones. LaVergne fired back by telling Abrams to “[l]ook up the First Amendment.” LaVergne later accused Abrams of making “a blatantly slanderous remark with no basis.”

This is a disgusting (and maybe anti-Semitic) tweet from OJ Simpson’s lawyer https://t.co/TD3l3nhbaO https://t.co/hzCvFvyEE5 — Dan Abrams (@danabrams) November 21, 2017

Clever comment, Mr. Abrams. Use the word “maybe” to insulate yourself from a slander lawsuit, then allow the “maybe” to morph into reality through your Twitter followers. When Goldmans use media to attack Mr. Simpson, I’ll comment. Look up the First Amendment. M. https://t.co/JRDPmFWNFD — Malcolm LaVergne (@SinCityAttorney) November 21, 2017

See, Mario, this is the kind of moronic feedback you get back when you respond to a certified loser seeking attention. Can’t beat me on strategy, so Abrams makes a blatantly slanderous remark with no basis. Invites call to action. Let me handle this and enjoy your holiday. M. — Malcolm LaVergne (@SinCityAttorney) November 23, 2017

Kim Goldman, the sister of murder victim Ron Goldman, jumped in after LaVergne called father Fred Goldman a “plantation master.” LaVergne said his client O.J. Simpson “is no saint, but your actions are specifically designed to dehumanize while profiting at the same time. Hence, slavery.”

Oh and calling my father a Slave Master isn’t slanderous …. and all the other lies you’ve been spreading? You @SinCityAttorney are a special kind of something to be that insensitive. Get off Twitter and stop including me in these disgusting tweets. https://t.co/KJXF66W8EW — Kim Goldman (@KimEGoldman) November 23, 2017

No, it’s not, Wacky Kim. Fair commentary re: Plantation Master Fred’s (and your) remarks toward Simpson as a human being with rights under the law. Simpson is no saint, but your actions are specifically designed to dehumanize while profiting at the same time. Hence, slavery. M. https://t.co/5PRvGXIVQk — Malcolm LaVergne (@SinCityAttorney) November 23, 2017

Kim Goldman responded: “No saint is right. Brutally stabbing two humans disqualifies him from that. Please remove me from your disgusting commentary (aka LIES!) about my family. Be better Malcolm, you have time.”

No saint is right. Brutally stabbing two humans disqualifies him from that. Please remove me from your disgusting commentary (aka LIES!) about my family. Be better Malcolm, you have time. https://t.co/XjNzzqBjEq — Kim Goldman (@KimEGoldman) November 23, 2017

Have a tip we should know? [email protected]