WSJ’s James Taranto presented a “compare & contrast” of Salon articles that were published following the deaths of Antonin Scalia and Osama bin Laden:

How’s that for an offset?



Remarkable difference of reaction. https://t.co/7mTNt4T48K — J. Michael Barnes (@wufpackmike) February 19, 2016

@jamestaranto @instapundit Seond piece on celebrating Scalia's death explicitly said it was wrong to celebrate Bin Laden's — Don Surber (@donsurber) February 19, 2016



https://twitter.com/dinok1975/status/700531466674053120

@jamestaranto @JammieWF Majority of Salon clicks likely from those who can't believe they really said something — Boris_Badenoff (@Boris_Badenoff) February 19, 2016

.@Salon likes Bin Laden more than it does Scalia, but in this climate and these times that's perfectly acceptable! https://t.co/JIBRgRG0ww — James M. Cain (@dmcparson) February 19, 2016

@jamestaranto @jtLOL @Salon must I in fact read TWO Salon articles??? I need a lot more coffee first… — Mark Anderson (@Manderskat) February 19, 2016

@jamestaranto @instapundit Nice Juxtaposition. Salon's concerned 4 grave dancing on a killer of 1000s, Hates an Obstruction to Dictatorship — Simarilian (@simarilian) February 19, 2016

Why do I continue to be shocked? https://t.co/utuloEdrXn — LJN (@ljnuzzi) February 19, 2016

More Salon insanity here.