Rome Wasn’t Built In a Day

And We Are Building A World Here!

Last week in crypto, we announced to the world our intentions to “hard-fork” Bitcoin & Z Classic, in an effort to build upon better where the others failed.

We chose to choose the highly credible platform of CNBC to propagate our strong intentions of creating the Anonymous Bitcoin, hoping to kill any doubts in the community’s mind by virtue of our grand-stage announcement.

To further cement the belief of a serious, focused team working around the clock to ensure we are counted amongst the rare projects who fulfill time-lines, we decided make team-transparency a major part of our coin’s ethos, dedicating a whole section to it on website and related social pages.

After all, Anonymous Bitcoin aims to set a new standard in what coin projects must look like, and it was imperative that the front-end be as good, if not better, as the developer-end.

However, I increasingly hear the community expressing dissatisfaction about the Anonymous Bitcoin project, while fixating on their faith in the price action of a related project, instead of the arguably superior technology we aim to provide.

This brings me to my point, that of addressing the daily demands of “news,” from our community members.

For all sane purposes, it is impractical for us to provide details of every line of code we type, every conference we plan to make plans for , or every word we jot for the next blog post.

Billion dollars projects have been seen in this space without whitepapers, and teams with whitepapers have been known to exit-scam.

So, is presence of a whitepaper the definitive of a “serious” project?

Or, is presence of a transparent team — reachable right from the founders to social media admins, which is readily communicating with the community — a better indicator of trustworthiness ?

This is not to say that we aren’t releasing a whitepaper. It comes out around the third week of May, 2018.

This is also not to say that we are forcing anyone to participate in our hard-fork. It is completely a supporter’s decision.

The core belief of our team lies in providing the world with the future of scalable, private, secure transactions, and no amount of pumped millions will dissuade us from achieving that.

In short, we won’t rest until the knowledge of our brand reaches ears around the world, with an evident working product available on exchanges big and small.

What we are answerable to, is our efforts.

What we aren’t answerable to, is the price of a related project.

Putting to rest all questions at once, here’s what we really won’t, can’t, or shan’t answer -

When Lambo ? Why is ZCL/BTC price stagnant? Why is the dev team not responding to trolls on Reddit? (Isn’t that obvious?) When (inserts line totally unrelated to the Anonymous Bitcoin Project) ?

Here’s what we, the team at Anonymous Bitcoin, will readily answer —

Tell me more about the Anonymous Bitcoin Protocol ? Who are your team members, and why should I be investing in them ? What made you choose ZCL for a hard fork ? I have a question regarding the tech/vision/team. Which exchanges are you working towards getting listed on? What effort is the team putting in for the project?

P.S — We launch our executive summary this week.

P.P.S — We highly recommend going through our blog in case the reader seeks education of “why hard-forks are required?”