NEW YORK (TheStreet) -- In TheStreet, I have long pointed out the dysfunction of the board of directors overseeing the New York branch of the Federal Reserve board.

Three years ago, Stephen Friedman, the former head of

Goldman Sachs

(GS) - Get Report

, traded Goldman stock while serving on the New York Fed board -- the same board that was playing an intimate role in trying to save Goldman and the entire financial system. He soon left the board.

Over the weekend, Gretchen Morgensen of the

New York Times

highlighted how Kathryn Wylde, who is the president of the Partnership for New York City and is a New York Fed director, got into a loud disagreement with New York state Attorney General Eric Schneiderman at a funeral last week.

Wylde told Schneiderman she (and by extension the New York Fed) disapproved of his unwillingness to approve a deal between

Bank of America

(BAC) - Get Report

and several investors suing for shady practices by its Countrywide unit.

The settlement, if not for Schneiderman holding it up, would have prevented future investigations into what kind of shenanigans went on during the mortgage lending heyday of 2005 to 2007.

Wylde apparently thinks that what's good for big Wall Street banks is what's good for New York City, New York State, and the country. If the banks want to sweep a bunch of deceitful practices under the rug, politicians and administrators like her should roll over and accept it.

She defended her line of thinking this way:

"Unlike Detroit, where the industry is cars, and Texas, where it is oil, in

New York State the primary industry is finance. The people of New York all share in the suffering due to lost tax revenues and reduced economic activity when our major financial institutions are weakened. That is why support for these institutions, insuring balance in the discussion, is very much in the public interest in NY."

Who's Fed Is It?

The question that we need to ask ourselves as a country is: Who should govern our financial system? Over a decade ago, a Democrat president (Bill Clinton) eliminated Glass-Steagall and essentially said: Our banks are smart enough to govern themselves.

For the first eight years of last decade, a Republican president (George W. Bush) allowed a culture of relaxed enforcement to permeate the SEC and other government regulatory bodies with regards to financial system oversight.

And President Obama also backed the same horse when he came into office, by appointing former head of the New York Fed, Tim Geithner, to Treasury Secretary.

But self-governance is not governance. If self-governance worked, there would be no need for boards. The CEO could simply go out to lunch with the CFO or some other executive and decide to buy a company, or move some money into and out of a personal account, etc.

Despite the lessons of the 2008 financial crisis, there has been no attempt to institute stronger governance to the financial system. The unspoken way of thinking -- which is really what is embedded in Wylde's comments to Schneiderman -- is: Our financial system is now too weak for stronger governance. That will be more time and money. That takes away from our margins, which are already so much less than they were when we were running 40:1 leverage.

Empty Chairs

At what point does someone say there need to be a parent around here to actually do some parenting with these banker kids and teenagers that are running around doing whatever they want?

And the New York Fed should be ground zero for governance for Wall Street. Instead, it's in cahoots with Wall Street.

Let's examine again the

governance structure for the New York Fed

.

There are nine board seats. Three of those seats are selected by banks (the industry that is being governed). Currently, those three are Jamie Dimon of

JP Morgan Chase

(JPM) - Get Report

, Richard Carrion of

Banco Populaire

, and Charles Wait of

Adirondack Trust

.

Then there are three seats selected by the Board of Governors of the NY Fed to represent the public. These three include Wylde (who, by her comments, has shown herself to be an advocate of the banks and not the public), Lee Bollinger who is the president of Columbia University and Emily Rafferty who is the president of the Metropolitan Museum of Art.

Then there are three seats selected by the banks to represent the public. Did you read that? The banks get to pick the people who are supposed to govern them and represent not the banks but the public. Of the three seats, only one of these is filled -- by Jim Tisch of

Loews Corporation

, who I do have the highest respect for and think would represent the public's interests.

Who are the other two? They are vacant seats. Odd. Why don't they fill them?

Even odder, these seats have been vacant since 2008. Why does it take over three years to find people worthy enough to fill this role? Is there no one in New York City -- let alone the country -- erudite enough to fill this role? It would seem you do not even have to be a financial expert to be qualified since Ms. Rafferty of the Met serves on this board.

The New York Fed should be absolutely be held accountable for why they haven't filled these two board seats.

All In Favor

As it stands, with those vacant board seats, and assuming Tisch is on the side of the public and Wylde is on the side of the banks, you have a board that is four in favor of the bankers and four in favor of the public.

It is jaw-dropping to me that this kind of self-governance is allowed to continue in plain sight of the public and the ignorant business media pays no attention.

The New York Federal Reserve needs to be completely revamped. In my view, it should be made up of people entirely not beholden to banks. Their job should be to ensure the whole financial system on Wall Street is strong. If it pisses off the bankers that they can't run 40:1 leverage and pretend they're a hedge fund, tough.

If we had that kind of strong governance of Wall Street, we never would have traveled down this path that has led us to such a dismal economy in the first place.

READERS ALSO LIKE:

Goldman's Blankfein Has Nothing to Fear >>

The Obama administration, following Bush's, has effectively decriminalized securities fraud.

A Huge Housing Bargain -- but Not for You >>

The largest transfer of wealth from the public to private sector is about to begin.

At the time of publication, Eric Jackson held no positions in any of the stocks mentioned.

Eric Jackson is founder and Managing Member of Ironfire Capital and the general partner and investment manager of Ironfire Capital US Fund LP and Ironfire Capital International Fund, Ltd. In January 2007, Jackson started the world's first Internet-based campaign to increase shareholder value at Yahoo!, leading to a change in CEOs in 2007. He also spoke out in favor of Yahoo!'s accepting Microsoft's buyout offer in 2008. Global Proxy Watch named Jackson as one of its 10 "Stars" who positively influenced international corporate governance and shareowner value in 2007.

Prior to founding Ironfire Capital, Jackson was President and CEO of Jackson Leadership Systems, Inc., a leadership, strategy, and governance consulting firm. He completed his Ph.D. in the Management Department at the Columbia University Graduate School of Business in New York, with a specialization in Strategic Management and Corporate Governance, and holds a B.A. from McGill University.

He was previously Vice President of Strategy and Business Development at VoiceGenie Technologies, a software firm now owned by Alcatel-Lucent. In 2004, Jackson founded the Young Patrons' Circle at the Royal Ontario Museum in Toronto, which is now the second-largest social and philanthropic group of its kind in North America, raising $500,000 annually for the museum. You can follow Jackson on Twitter at www.twitter.com/ericjackson or @ericjackson.

You can contact Eric by emailing him at eric.jackson@thestreet.com.