Environment officials in Australia plan to back the destruction of a large area of forest, despite warnings of significant harm to the region’s nature.

Experts have cautioned that runoff caused by the clearing is likely to damage the neighbouring Great Barrier Reef, and the forest itself is home to endangered species including the northern quoll.

Nevertheless, a draft report from the Department of Environment has recommended that the clearance of forest at Kingvale Station in northern Queensland should go ahead, subject to certain conditions.

The move comes shortly after the Australian government committed AUD $500m (£278m) to shielding the Great Barrier Reef from harm.

Within this pledge was a commitment of $201m (£112m) specifically for improving water quality by investing in changed farming practices such as reduced fertiliser use.

Land clearance in the 2000 hectare area was previously approved in April 2014, but the federal government decided that the clearing must first be assessed under Commonwealth laws.

Environment minister Josh Frydenberg must now make a final ruling on the proposal, in a move that is being viewed as a test of his long-standing pledge to protect the reef.

Kingvale Station currently consists mainly of eucalyptus forest and swampland, but the land’s owner – Scott Harris – wants to clear it to make way for cropping and other activities. His intentions are supported by local Queensland MPs.

Lisa Murray's climate change photography Show all 12 1 /12 Lisa Murray's climate change photography Lisa Murray's climate change photography Dinka cattle herders starting their migration in South Sudan Lisa Murray Lisa Murray's climate change photography A Dinka woman fetches water in South Sudan Lisa Murray Lisa Murray's climate change photography Veronica in South Sudan preparing tea outside her home, recently ravaged by heavy flooding Lisa Murray Lisa Murray's climate change photography Children playing in Vietnam. When it floods, transport to and from school is a major challenge Lisa Murray Lisa Murray's climate change photography Sugeng, a fish and crab farmer from Indonesia who suffers financially every time the area floods Lisa Murray Lisa Murray's climate change photography Tan, a vegetable farmer, learning new methods through Oxfam in Vietnam Lisa Murray Lisa Murray's climate change photography Maluk, a 19-year-old from Tonj South, South Sudan Lisa Murray Lisa Murray's climate change photography Normally this farmer in South Sudan would be harvesting sorghum, but rains are late so the hunger season continues Lisa Murray Lisa Murray's climate change photography Herders bringing home their cattle in Afar, Ethiopia Lisa Murray Lisa Murray's climate change photography Farmers harvesting chilli in Ethiopia Lisa Murray Lisa Murray's climate change photography A woman in Tigray, Ethiopia, scares birds away from her crops with a slingshot Lisa Murray Lisa Murray's climate change photography Irula tribe woman in Tamil Nadu Lisa Murray

The land’s river system flows into Princess Charlotte Bay, which contains extensive seagrass beds that are considered a key component in the reef ecosystem.

Besides rising temperatures and coral bleaching – which led to “catastrophic die-offs” of large areas of coral in 2016 – poor water quality is one of the biggest threats facing the Great Barrier Reef.

Soil erosion is thought to make a significant contribution to this poor water quality, and scientists have warned the government that it must be avoided.

Runoff from farmland promotes the growth of algae, which blocks light from reaching coral, seagrass and creatures inhabiting the seabed.

These conditions also exacerbate outbreaks of crown-of-thorns starfish, which feed on coral and have played a significant role in the reef’s decline.

The Wilderness Society’s Queensland campaign manager Gemma Plesman told The Canberra Times the clearing was “incredibly risky” and “must be rejected”.

“Over the past four years Queensland has cleared one million hectares of native vegetation because the former Newman Government axed important environment protections,” she said.

A spokesman for Mr Frydenberg said the draft report “proposed strict conditions and mitigation measures informed by expert scientific advice”.

Among the conditions proposed by the department’s report were restricting clearance to flat areas of land in order to “manage the risks" of erosion and sedimentation, and not allowing clearing to occur within 100 metres of a watercourse or wetland.