Suffolk District Attorney Rachael Rollins’ no-prosecute list — that includes cases she’s fighting to drop against some anti-Straight Pride Parade protesters — leaves little recourse for victims if a case simply goes away, legal experts say.

“Anyone that has been wronged by someone who is getting the benefit of DA Rollins’ non-prosecution list has no recourse in the criminal justice system,” said former Suffolk County prosecutor Tim Bradl.

The DA’s petition to jettison parade protest cases, filed with the Supreme Judicial Court, is based on one defendant, Roderick Webber, 45, of Holbrook, charged with disorderly conduct and resisting arrest at Saturday’s Straight Pride Parade. He was one of the 36 counterprotesters arrested that day.

Bradl said should a case be thrown out, the only thing a victim could do is sue for damages, which he called a “very unsatisfying process.”

“The DA should probably consider that there is no civil remedy when she applies her non-prosecution decision,” said Bradl, adding that Rollins is taking her discretion to “unprecedented levels.”

Victim’s Rights Law, under Massachusetts General Law, guarantees certain rights like notice of the proceedings and an impact statement from victims, but it doesn’t guarantee a prosecution.

Boston criminal lawyer David Yannetti said under the Victim’s Rights Law, the district attorney’s office, police and prosecutors are required to get input from the victim, which can make a considerable impact.

“In cases where an alleged victim is gung-ho to see a case prosecuted, it does put a lot of pressure on a DA’s office to do just that,” said Yannetti.

Boston criminal defense attorney Brad Bailey said some people, feeling stuck without any in-court relief, turn to social media to air out their grievances.

Bailey also said some victims may choose to sue for damages, but the process can be very long and expensive.