Article content continued

Even the modest free-standing cottage, once the favourite nesting place of acting legend Kate Reid when she was a member of the Shaw Festival company, has been artfully incorporated into the overall complex.

Compare this example of architectural harmony with the ugly, modernistic slab contemplated for the Château Laurier, a designated National Historic Site, and you can understand why the guardians of Canada’s heritage are in such a tizzy.

True, there is a school of thought that believes an extension to an historic structure must differentiate from the original by indicating which section is old and which is new. On that basis, therefore, the Prince of Wales expansion might constitute a serious error – were it not for the fact that it happens to look right.

Unlike what is proposed for one of the most famous corners of Canada, it does not strike a discordant note. It is not an affront to a revered skyline and its surrounding space.

It’s perhaps understandable that architects of today feel drawn to make some kind of personal statement with their work – even when dealing with a hallowed site. But they shouldn’t be allowed to disregard existing standards and guidelines for preservation of historic places in Canada.

They can’t seriously argue that the current proposal will “conserve the heritage value and character-defining elements” of the Château Laurier, or that it will be “physically and visually compatible” with the original building. Indeed the present owners should check out the discreet addition to the Lord Elgin Hotel just five minutes away.