Former presidential candidate Mitt Romney is going “full Mississippi” with claims about Donald Trump’s taxes. It doesn’t matter that there is no basis for the ridiculous assertions – the truth and/or facts are not what matters when you go “full Mississippi”…. it’s a strategy!

The absolute worst thing Donald Trump could do is to respond to it. Responding to the provocation is exactly what they want. Dismiss it like you would swat an annoying gnat.

Mitt Romney – “The reason that I think there’s a bombshell in there is because every time he’s asked about his taxes he dodges and delays and says, ‘Well we’re working on it,'” Romney told Fox News. “We’re now, you know, in late February and we still haven’t seen either Donald Trump’s or Marco Rubio’s or Ted Cruz’s taxes,” he added, referring to the two US senators challenging Trump for the nomination. “Frankly the voters have a right to see those tax returns before they decide who our nominee ought to be.” (link)

There is a specific reason why Mitt Romney is saying this. There is also a specific reason why this specific reason, income taxes, is being used. Here’s what’s going on.

First, why Mitt Romney? The GOPe is positioning Romney to step into the 2016 presidential election either as a vulgarian alternative in a brokered convention, or as an independent alternative (third party campaign) to carry the torch of the traditional republican party – because the party cannot accept total and complete defeat.

However, in order for either approach to hold any possibility they first need to try removing Donald Trump. This “full Mississippi” approach is essentially the power-brokers within the RNC positioning an alternative.

Yes, the GOPe are violating the terms of the party loyalty pledge they previously made Donald Trump sign; but with foot soldiers being used to create plausible deniability, they will deny it. The people now constructing the attacks against Donald Trump are the same people who met in DC in February 2014 and finalized the GOPe roadmap to nominate Jeb Bush.

The GOPe are positioning. They are manufacturing alternatives to the failed roadmap that Donald Trump shredded as he used their own splitter strategy against them.

The GOPe apparatus, writ large, are positioning alternatives. Mitt Romney is the selected tip of the spear, the insurance policy, the means. They cannot advance alternative strategies unless they have a figure head ready in the event they are successful.

This all goes back to the original 2014 scheme. Again, for emphasis: did you really think a 44-year-old freshman senator with no executive experience, a family, four kids, and no status or accumulated wealth, would give up his only paying job and mount a long-shot presidential bid unless he was being manipulated or pushed to do so? Think about it. Be intellectually honest with yourself.

Do you think it’s accidentally ironic for Mitt Romney to be using “income tax returns” as the flash-bang grenade to suck up media oxygen? Of course not. This is strategery at its highest level. The GOPe players who coordinate this stuff know the irony will be part of the media narrative.

The irony expands and amplifies the effect of the flash-bang grenade. The irony, by design, also makes it more difficult to ignore. The “irony” is intentional. The irony is part of the plan. The irony is embedded into the story to make people draw attention to the accusation.

Seeing some clarity now?

Signing my tax return…. http://t.co/XJfXeaORbU—

Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 15, 2015

“Full Mississippi” by design is intended to make the target respond. All framework within the “Full-Mississippi” attacks are intended to suck up media oxygen.

The most successful “full Mississippi” attacks cannot be ignored.

Mitt Romney is participating in a much larger plan, this absurd claim today is not mere happenstance. Because Romney is the GOPe’s Alamo, this is why Mitt Romney has not endorsed Marco Rubio.

The GOPe are planning to take down Donald Trump. The GOPe want Mitt Romney to fulfill the role formerly assigned to Jeb Bush. The GOPe know Marco Rubio is insufferably weak and will not win the nomination…..

…. he was never intended to.

Know the scheme. Train yourself to understand how they play the game. We can and will defeat them. There are more of us than them.

….Subtle like a brick through a window when you know what you are looking at ! And Donald Trump knows what is going on ! – SEE HERE

Just a Reminder, this is an insurgency. – The modern enemy of Wall Street is Main Street vulgarians. The enemy of the RNC/GOPe is not Democrats, it’s Grassroots Conservatives, more vulgarians.

The Republican Party, and the Republican media apparatus, view us as their enemy. We are the enemy they need to protect themselves from:

In 2014, the RNC approved selection rules that govern how each state’s delegates are portioned out from the primaries. Under one of the changes, states holding their primaries between March 1 and March 14 will have their delegates doled out proportionately with election results, a change that will likely stymie a movement candidate.

States that have primaries on or after March 15 will be winner-take-all states. That’s important because another RNC rule change requires that a candidate must win a majority of delegates in eight or more states before his or her name may be presented for nomination at the 2016 Republican National Convention.

With 18 GOP presidential candidates, for now, it will be that much harder for any candidate to win a majority in any state, let alone eight. (Article July 2015) Now, ask yourself, why would the RNC want to “stymie a movement candidate“? Who exactly does that benefit? Obviously, the “non-movement” candidate, ie “the turtle“. Isn’t the entire reason for campaigning in Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina etc. to make a movement/momentum? In addition Rule #40 changed in 2014 from previously five needed state wins, to a newer threshold of eight (8): Officially, it’s Rule 40 in the RNC handbook and it states that any candidate for president “shall demonstrate the support of a majority of the delegates from each of eight (8) or more states” before their name is presented for nomination at the national convention. (article March 2014) Again, ask yourself who does this benefit? A candidate can win seven states outright, and still not have their name presented for nomination? These rules were made/affirmed in 2014 – Who or what exactly was the GOP concerned about blocking in 2016 that would necessitate such rules? When combined with other rule changes you can clearly identify a consolidation of power within the RNC apparatus intentionally constructed to stop the candidate of the GRASSROOTS from achieving victory. It’s all part of their GOPe Roadmap.

♦ Reference and Resources – (links to internal MSM references are contained within prior outlines): RNC Rule Changes RNC Rule Battles