The NCAA knew it was coming. Some of the documents and bank records from the FBI investigation into corruption in college basketball have been revealed.

NBA Rookie of the Year, former UVA standout Malcolm Brogdon is named in the report from Yahoo!’s Pat Forde and Pete Thamel.

However, in the documents that list expenditures from former NBA agent Andy Miller, Christian Dawkins, and ASM, which details the depth and breadth of loans and benefits provided to high school and college athletes, Brogdon, himself, is not mentioned.

The inclusion of Brogdon in the report is the expense report entry by Dawkins on March 3rd, 2016 of “Dinner w/Malcolm Brogdon mom”

The dinner at The Ritz Carlton totaled $64.16.

First, there’s nothing impermissible about meeting with an agent or having a meal with an agent. What’s not permissible is the agent paying for the meal.

What is not clear is whether Dawkins is expensing his meal he personally had with Brogdon’s mom, Jann Adams, or whether he paid her portion.

Regardless, this should have zero impact on UVA Basketball currently. Brogdon is graduated and NCAA Bylaw 16.01.1 states that Brogdon, if it is proven that his mother’s meal was paid for, can wipe this clean by donating $64.16 to the charity of his choice:

16.01.1 Eligibility Effect of Violation. [A] A student-athlete shall not receive any extra benefit. Receipt by a student-athlete of an award, benefit or expense allowance not authorized by NCAA legislation renders the student-athlete ineligible for athletics competition in the sport for which the improper award, benefit or expense was received. If the student-athlete receives an extra benefit not authorized by NCAA legislation, the individual is ineligible in all sports. 16.01.1.1 Restitution for Receipt of Impermissible Benefits. [A] Unless otherwise noted, for violations of Bylaw 16 in which the value of the benefit is $100 or less, the eligibility of the student-athlete shall not be affected conditioned upon the student-athlete repaying the value of the benefit to a charity of his or her choice. The student-athlete, however, shall remain ineligible from the time the institution has knowledge of receipt of the impermissible benefit until the student-athlete repays the benefit. For violations of Bylaw 16 in which there is no monetary value to the benefit, violations shall be considered institutional violations per Constitution 2.8.1; however, such violations shall not affect the student-athlete's eligibility.

For the full report and photos of the expense reports, CLICK HERE.