During the last forty-eight hours the news has been dominated by reports of a random, cowardly, ill-conceived and deplorable attack on members of the Muslim community of Finsbury Park, London.

The attack appears to have been carried out by a man who has no previous history of racist or Islamophobic behaviour; who has no history of membership of so-called ‘far-right’ groups or political parties; who has according to the police, ‘no far-right digital footprint’; and who was unknown to the security services and was similarly unknown to any British or White nationalist political organisations. The motivation for this attack is unclear, although the attacker is reported by eye witnesses to have shouted that he wanted “to kill all Muslims” and attempted once captured to goad his captors into killing him, shouting “kill me, kill me”.

Muslim leaders and representatives of our political establishment have hastily declared this a ‘terrorist’ attack and have called for the government to do more to suppress what they term ‘far-right’ extremism and ‘Islamophobia’. The evidence however does not support this view and there is every reason to believe that this attack on the Muslim community of Finsbury Park can be categorised as similar in many respects to the murder of Jo Cox – as murder and possibly religious/politically motivated murder, but not really ‘terrorism’.

I will explain:

Both Thomas Mair and Darren Osborne, the man accused of carrying out the Finsbury Mosque attack, carried out their attacks when their lives were at a low point and they were socially isolated.

Thomas Mair lived alone following the deaths of his mother and his grandmother, he had never married, was a loner who didn’t socialise much and was described by some neighbours as a ‘recluse’.

Darren Osborne, on the other hand, is unemployed, separated from his partner and the mother of his children, and has been described as an obnoxious and aggressively anti-social person who liked to goad others into fighting him.

Both men have a history of mental issues.

Both men have a history of interacting quite amicably with non-White friends, relatives and neighbours to such an extent as to belie any suggestion that they were motivated by racism.

Thomas Mair appears to have interacted quite amicably and over a period of twenty years with his mother’s second husband, who was West Indian, and with his subsequent mixed race half-brother, Duane St Louis. His neighbours testified that he had never in all the years they had known him expressed any political views while in conversation with them.

Thomas Mair appears to have corresponded with foreign White nationalist websites during the 1990s and very early 2000s, and appears to have researched terrorist related topics online more recently, but neither man was a member of a British nationalist or White nationalist political organisation or had any recent interaction with any. Not within the last ten to fifteen years in Thomas Mair’s case, and not at all regarding Darren Osborne.

While Darren Osborne is reported to have been thrown out of his local pub last Saturday evening for ‘cursing Muslims’ and threatening to ‘do some damage’ during a drunken altercation, he acted out of kindness the following morning, changing a broken water tap in the house of his Muslim next door neighbour, apparently just hours before launching his attack!

Therefore, while there is an aspect of right-wing or racial/religious motivation to the actions of both men, neither of them could be described in any unqualified sense as adherents of ‘far-right’ or ‘White nationalist’ ideology, and furthermore, while they apparently committed politically motivated murders, they were not intent on achieving any political goals through ‘terrorism’, that is, through ‘terrorising’ anyone or any section of society.

Neither man issued any political threat prior to their attacks, and so no-one will have been induced to change or modify their behaviour or political beliefs because of the threat of attack by these men. Furthermore, the attacks were carried out in such a way that both men were bound to be apprehended and the threat they posed neutralised following the attacks. No-one would therefore be ‘terrorised’ by them after the event, and as neither man belonged to any organisation or was in communication with any organisation employing or advocating violence or the threat of violence for political purposes – ‘far-right’, ‘extremist’ or otherwise — the term ‘terrorism’ used to describe their actions is a misnomer.

These were politically and religiously motivated murders and attacks, but not strictly speaking ‘terrorism’ in the sense generally accepted by the public. There is therefore a critical difference between the actions of these two men and the actions of the Muslim terrorists that have carried out so many attacks in Britain and other Western countries in recent times. I don’t state this with any aim of lessoning the seriousness with which people view their crimes, but in order to prevent government action taken as a consequence of them being either deliberately or accidentally misdirected.

Muslim terrorists have acted in accordance with threats issued by the Islamic terrorist groups with whom they sympathised, Al Qaida and ISIS, and furthermore in accordance with specific scriptural texts encouraging Muslims to employ violence against apostates and unbelievers. Violence is employed by these Muslim extremists with the very real expectation that it will achieve political or religious ends and in the belief that they will thereafter spend eternity in paradise because of their actions. Nothing comparable exists regarding the actions of Thomas Mair or Darren Osborne.

There are no White nationalist, British nationalist or ‘far-right’ groups in Britain calling for violence to be perpetrated against racial, religious, ethnic or political opponents or minority groups. There has been no declaration of ‘Holy War’ to which sympathisers are urged to sign up and there is no ideological ‘scripture’ advocating politically or racially or religiously motivated violence.

There are White nationalist and British nationalist groups that anticipate a progressive break-down of Western civilisation and foresee a time when White people will be forced to defend ourselves against attack from imported terrorism, but that is an eventuality which insofar as it is prepared for, is done so reluctantly, with dread, and without any intention of initiating violence. These are the critical differences between the reality of Islamic terrorism and the myth of any comparable threat from the ‘far-right’!

There is an eagerness on the part of our political elite and our ethnic minority communities to have the actions of Thomas Mair and Darren Osborne designated as ‘terrorism’, because this appeases their concerns and it also allows government to unfairly criminalise White nationalist groups and provides a pretext to ban the public expression of the inconvenient truths we speak. This is why they disingenuously seek to characterise what are in fact isolated acts of irrational politically motivated or religiously motivated murder as part of a wider campaign of extremism aimed at provoking violence.

There is no such thing as a ‘multicultural community’, such a term is an oxymoron, because despite some fringe mixing and miscegenation, the social dynamics of a multicultural, multi-ethnic or multiracial (MCMEMR) society inevitably causes each individual group to adopt an in-group/out-group attitude towards its dealings with all others and what always results is a series of separate communities, each eking out a fragile co-existence among the others.

Competition for finite resources and for political influence creates social dynamics within MCMEMR societies that inevitably leads to intercommunal tension, intercommunal rivalry, intercommunal jealousy, strife and eventually intercommunal violence. This is a pattern that can be identified in every MCMEMR society that exists today or that has ever been, and the quickening pace, and the worsening intercommunal violence that we see in Britain today can only end one way. No matter how hard the politically correct, pluralistic, one-world, cultural Marxist, liberal zealots try, and no matter how many ‘prevent’, equality and/or inclusivity initiatives are taken.

Those who are the architects of our MCMEMR society have set in motion an inevitable train of events that will inexorably lead to Britain’s descent into the chaos and corruption and sectarian and intercommunal violence that characterises all ‘Third World’ states. An inevitable train of events that is, unless we decide to unravel what has been done, before the tangled web of lies and deceptions and betrayals has been pulled too tightly into a Gordian knot of impossible proportions.

Our government needs to decide where its loyalties lie and to which of the ‘communities’ that currently exist on our British Isles it owes its allegiance. One would hope the community chosen would be the indigenous British people, and if so they should stop further immigration from countries that have populations that are racially incompatible with we White indigenous British and cultures that are incompatible with the British way of life and begin devising ways of humanely returning our ethnic minority populations to their lands of ethnic origin. This is the only course of action that will avoid the inevitability of perpetual intercommunal violence.

Let us hope that common sense prevails!

By Max Musson © 2017

# # # #

JOIN WESTERN SPRING

Western Spring is not just a website. We are a community of people dedicated to achieving the Six Prerequisites and thereby acquiring the wherewithal needed to win political power and through that secure the future survival, proliferation and advancement of the British people and other White peoples of European descent, wherever they may live. Please join us:

[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]

# # # #