President Donald Trump's speech is likely to stress the role of economics in what he calls his “America First” foreign policy, a phrase echoed by the security vision | Evan Vucci/AP Photo Trump: U.S. can't guard its interests abroad if it doesn't 'protect prosperity at home' The president’s first National Security Strategy takes a tough line on Russia as critics wonder whether it reflects Trump’s true thinking.

President Donald Trump unveiled a national security plan Monday that reflects the most inward-focused vision of American foreign policy in recent memory — with a heavy emphasis on economic strength and defending U.S. borders.

In remarks Monday afternoon, Trump pointed to his November 2016 election and his January inauguration as turning points for a nation whose leaders he said had forgotten "whose voices they were to respect and whose interests they were supposed to defend."


"Optimism has surged. Confidence has returned. With this new confidence, we are also bringing back clarity to our thinking. We are reasserting these fundamental truths: A nation without borders is not a nation. A nation that does not protect prosperity at home cannot protect its interests abroad," he said.

Trump also argued that strength at home is the first step toward strength abroad.

"A nation that is not prepared to win a war is a nation not capable of preventing a war. A nation that is not proud of its history cannot be confident in its future and a nation that is not certain of its values cannot summon the will to defend them."

Yet many foreign policy observers noted Monday that Trump's official National Security Strategy presents relatively conventional views that are at odds with the president’s own positions—including its praise for the role of diplomacy and warnings about Russia’s malign intentions.

Morning Defense A daily briefing about national security — weekday mornings, in your inbox. Email Sign Up By signing up you agree to receive email newsletters or alerts from POLITICO. You can unsubscribe at any time. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

That contrast has critics dismissing the document's importance. The strategy “is wildly inconsistent with Trump administration behavior,” said Kori Schake, a former State Department official now at Stanford University’s conservative Hoover Institution.

Trump's strategy sternly declares that Russia, along with China, “challenge[s] American power, influence and interests, attempting to erode American security and prosperity.” It also warns against the belief that “engagement with rivals” will turn them into “benign actors and trustworthy partners.” That echoes the critique of foreign policy insiders concerned about Trump’s frequent vows to befriend Russian President Vladimir Putin.

And it strikes a different note than Trump himself did on Monday when he recounted a Sunday phone call with Putin, who thanked Trump for shared CIA intelligence that averted planned bombings in the Russian city of Saint Petersburg.

"That's a great thing, and the way it's supposed to work. That is the way it's supposed to work," Trump said.

It is unusual for a president to deliver a speech about the document, which is required by Congress but usually of interest mainly to specialists. Senior Trump officials said on Sunday they couldn’t recall a president producing a national security strategy in his first year or unveiling it with a national address.

The strategy could offer a clearer vision to foreign governments unsure of Trump’s intentions and confounded by conflicting signals from his administration on issues from negotiating with North Korea to trade with China.

Although the strategic vision was largely assembled by White House and Cabinet officials, a senior administration official said that it “illustrates how invested in it [Trump] is, and how well he thinks it accurately reflects his priorities and what he’s trying to do on the world stage.”

Trump has struggled in his first year to show tangible foreign policy successes. He has failed to halt North Korea’s nuclear and missile programs; seen his effort to repair relations with Moscow thwarted by Congress; and declined to follow through on threats to upend Obama's 2015 Iran nuclear deal.

Trump’s defenders say he has restored an image of strength abroad with tough talk and calls for more defense spending, and revitalized ties with allies like Israel, Saudi Arabia and Egypt.

Trump stressed the role of economics in what he calls his “America First” foreign policy, a phrase echoed by the security vision. In the same way Trump is hoping to sell passage this week of a comprehensive tax reform law as another boost to the U.S. economy, the president is looking to link his foreign policy to the country’s soaring stock market and GDP growth.

"Economic vitality, growth and prosperity at home is absolutely necessary for American power and influence abroad. Any nation that trades away its prosperity for security will end up losing both," the president said Monday. "That is why this national security strategy emphasizes more than ever before the critical steps we must take to ensure the prosperity of our nation for a long, long time to come."

A senior administration official who briefed reporters Sunday night ahead of the president’s speech and the new report’s release noted that Defense Secretary James Mattis had recently said that gross domestic product is “the strongest weapon” Trump has.

Stressing America’s domestic identity and security, the plan declares that the government’s "fundamental responsibility is to protect the American people, the homeland, and the American way of life,” adding that “[s]trengthening control over our borders and immigration system is central to national security, economic prosperity, and the rule of law."

One of Trump’s senior aides said during the media briefing that the new national security report reflects “an unprecedented focus on homeland security and the border” compared with the strategies released by past Democratic or Republican administrations.

Yet in some cases the document seems at odds with Trump’s record. His State Department has been targeted for a cut of roughly 30 percent and is dealing with a raft of unfilled ambassadorships and other key diplomatic posts. But the new strategy says the U.S. “must upgrade our diplomatic capabilities to compete in the current environment.”

And while members of Congress and foreign diplomats have condemned Trump for undermining democratic norms and showing little regard for human rights issues, the strategy declares that “America’s commitment to liberty, democracy, and the rule of law serves as an inspiration for those living under tyranny.”

Those contrasts, and the nonbinding nature of the document, leave Trump critics skeptical that it is worth taking seriously.

“The NSS isn't a strong enough document to constrain the president's actions, therefore I don't expect it will shape behavior, either of the administration or other countries toward us,” said Schake, who co-edited a book with Mattis last year.

Addressing both Russia and China, Trump’s national security strategy takes a tough view on both by lumping them into a category of countries his administration has dubbed “revisionist powers” who have been “seeking to change the status quo” of international relations.

“Most people would argue that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Georgia, those activities sought to change the status quo in Europe and generally in not a positive direction nor a peaceful direction,” said the senior Trump administration official. “That’s what revisionism means. We don’t use it that often.”

On China, Trump labels the country a strategic "competitor” because of its use of political, economic, military and information efforts not seen elsewhere in the world. It’s a carefully crafted approach that takes into account the fact the U.S. still needs Beijing’s help to deal with North Korea.

“We know that we need China, to work with them, and we’ve continued to work with them on the DPRK problem,” the senior administration official said. "It’s not mutually exclusive. We’re working together to cooperate and at the same time that competition exists as well.”

On Sunday, Trump aides also pointed to Trump's latest conversation with Putin as a positive development.

“It was a great example of cooperation where there was a shared interest,” said another Trump senior administration official who participated in the news briefing.

“We’ve still seen a lot of areas where our interests either don’t align or directly conflict,” the senior administration official added. “We’re certainly better off than we were several months ago, when both the secretary of state and the president remarked that the relationship seemed to be at a low point.”

But Trump's handling of Putin has drawn criticisms from other past national security officials.

Putin "knows how to handle an asset," Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said Monday on CNN. "And that's what he's doing with the president."

Clapper, who served under the administrations of both former Presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush, said Putin was effectively channeling his past career with the KGB in his handling of Trump.

In one sharp break from international consensus, Trump’s document does not present climate change as a national security issue. Obama’s last national security strategy, compiled in 2015, mentioned climate change more than a dozen times.

But Trump’s aides said his security strategy on the climate issue is instead premised off the same themes he outlined last June in abandoning the Paris climate accord that was negotiated in 2015 by 195 countries, including the United States.

Trump’s vision on the issue now says, “U.S. leadership is indispensable to countering an anti-growth energy agenda that is detrimental to U.S. economic and energy security interests.”



Louis Nelson and Cristiano Lima contributed to this report.

