There are no depths of hypocrisy that a Democratic elected official will not sink. It has almost become expected of them to blast a Republican for doing the very exact thing that they are themselves doing it.

Look at the last few days with Democrats blasting Trump for his executive orders while they defended for eight years Mr. Obama for the same thing. However, to them somehow that was different. What is ironic is that those that are screaming the loudest have the most to hide.

A U.S. senator who took advantage of a loophole in ethics laws to avoid disclosing a $1.3 million credit line against her home is now warning that incomplete financial disclosures from cabinet nominees put the country at risk. Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s (D., Mass.) warning came in the Washington Post, where she wrote that “it is critical that each nominee follows basic ethics rules to ensure that they will act for the benefit of all the American people.”

Warren argued that financial disclosures are needed to “reveal potentially damaging information that may undermine fitness to serve” and that nominees with “complex financial histories” need to be “forthcoming and transparent.”

Warren, a strident critic of big banks, continues to skirt congressional ethics laws by failing to include a $1.3 million line of credit against her Cambridge, Massachusetts, home on financial disclosure forms. The line of credit was extended to Warren and her husband Bruce Mann in 2007 through financial giant Bank of America. It was first noted by the Boston Herald after Warren failed to include the line of credit as a liability on her 2014 financial disclosure filing. It was also absent from her 2015 filing.

An aide for Warren, who is worth millions, defended the omission, stating at the time that a home equity line of credit like the one that Warren received from Bank of America doesn’t have the same reporting requirements as a typical home mortgage, which laws require disclosure.

The STOCK Act, signed into law in 2012, mandated that all members of Congress disclose details of any mortgages on their personal residences in their annual filings.

Federal law requires lawmakers and other federal officials to annually disclose their financial assets and liabilities, including mortgages. In a form filed last week, Warren stated she and her husband, Bruce Mann, had no debt liabilities in 2014.

The legislation, however, does not mention home equity lines of credit, which banks offer as alternatives to a mortgage. The Warren aide said that the senator had yet to borrow on the line of credit, which allowed her to leave it off disclosure forms.

The exact terms of Warren’s deal with Bank of America such as her interest rate remain a mystery due to the lack of disclosure. Warren’s office did not return a request for comment on her decision to take out a line of credit.

Warren has previously advised against the financial decision to borrow against your home. In her 2005 book All Your Worth: The Ultimate Lifetime Money Plan, she wrote that “it is not smart” and “it is not savvy.”

“Whether you are borrowing to pay down your credit card debt, play the stock market, or travel to Tahiti, borrowing against your home is still borrowing–period. It is not saving, it is not smart, it is not savvy. A second mortgage or a home equity line of credit is plain old Steal-from-Tomorrow debt.”

The Senate hearings into Trump’s pick for Treasury Secretary gave Elizabeth Warren a stage and an audience to hang herself. Warren called OneWest, the finance group Mnuchin ran, “a foreclosure machine” and Mnuchin “the Forrest Gump of the financial crisis – he managed to participate in all the worst practices on Wall Street.”

Warren also pounced on Mnuchin’s financial disclosure forms. According to a memo released by the committee’s Democratic staff, Mnuchin initially failed to disclose real estate assets, including homes in Los Angeles and Southampton, N.Y., and $15 million in holdings in Mexico.

The committee questionnaire Mnuchin submitted Dec. 19 also didn’t disclose his position as director of Dune Capital International in the Cayman Islands and about $907,000 worth of artwork held by his children.

After questions from committee staff, Mnuchin included the information on revised questionnaires he submitted this month. Mnuchin said Thursday oversight was unintentional.

“I think as you all can appreciate, filling out these government forms is quite complicated.”

Sen. Elizabeth Warren wasn’t sympathetic. She is not on the committee but said via Twitter that, “When Mnuchin makes mistakes on complicated paperwork, he asks for forgiveness. When his customers made mistakes, he took their homes.”

So this begs the question, who will she ask forgiveness to for her blatant disregard for the law. We cannot call it an oversight, in her words she called a line of credit on a home as financial stupidity; so why did she do it? If she thinks that such things are not savvy, then there are no reasonable excuses as to why it existed in the first place.

Which brings us to the next item, if she knew it was not ‘savvy’ and then did it anyway, we must conjecture as to why she went ahead with the line of credit. As an influential professor that has taught as such storied places as the University of Pennsylvania, Rutgers, the University of Texas and Harvard to name a few; as someone that is considered a leading mind in bankruptcy and commercial law, no one can argue her intelligence.

She would have to have known that the line of credit would not be subject to reporting under Ethics Committee rules. When it boils down to it, she ignored her advice for personal gain. We saw what she did to the CEO of Wells Fargo not too long ago. But other than brief mentions in letters, we have not seen her claws come out against Bank of America, even though they have engaged in much the same practices of other financial institutions.

So we are left with Chief Legislates-with-Hypocrisy giving a pass that extended her a large line of credit against her property while grilling and publically embarrassing banks that did not give her the ability to enrich herself. Convenient, isn’t it.