Classes in Ruby are first-class objects—each is an instance of class Class. -- ruby-doc.org

class Person

...

end

Person = Class . new do

...

end

Class.new(super_class=Object) creates a new anonymous (unnamed) class with the given superclass (or Object if no parameter is given). You can give a class a name by assigning the class object to a constant. -- ruby-doc.org

klass = Class . new

klass . ancestors klass . new . class

Person = klass

Person . ancestors Person . new . class

klass . ancestors klass . new . class klass

require ' test/unit '



module Gateway

def post ( arg )

true

end

end



class GatewayTest < Test::Unit::TestCase

def test_post_returns_true

klass = Class . new do

include Gateway

end

assert_equal true , klass . new . post ( 1 )

end

end

Most classes are defined using the syntax of the following example.Defining classes this way is familiar to most developers. Ruby provides another syntax for defining classes using Class.new. The following example also defines the Person class.The following example shows that the new class begins as an anonymous Class instance, but becomes a named class when it's assigned to a constant.I generally use traditional syntax when defining named classes, but I have found anonymous classes very helpful when creating maintainable tests. For example, I often need to test instance methods of a Module. The following tests show how you can define a class, include a module, and assert the expected value all within one test method.There are other ways to solve this issue, but I prefer this solution because it keeps everything necessary for the test within the test itself.Another advantage to defining classes using Class.new is that you can pass a block to the new method; therefore, the block could access variables defined within the same scope. In practice, I've never needed this feature, but it's worth noting.