I see lots of pundits trying to pick the top. Fool's errand. Better to watch for a bifurcation off the top before betting on a change of trend; otherwise ride it up. The recent bifurcation carried down into a trading plateau, but not below, meaning no break of trend. We would need a sharp drop below 1275 that stays below to confirm a change.

The market is in a channel and is touching the top trendline. The recent trading range was right on the mid-channel between the upper and lower trendlines. A bounce off the midline confirms a continuation of trend. You can see this in the following chart comparing the Dow with the Trannies (courtesy EWTrends). The Dow remains in the upper half of the channel while the Trannies have broken down, a divergence in Dow Theory, which would require a reversal back up in the Trannies to support a continued bull market:

Typically a trend ends with a false break, which in this case would be a thrust above that quickly (relative to the length of the trend) falls back below. Right now the trendline is above where we are, both on a closing and intraday basis, at 1328 Wednesday and climbing 1.5 pts/day. The STU is doing a good job of watching this closely and positing potential turn levels.

I see a lot of the pundit-sphere pointing to a 78% retrace level (of the drop from Oct 2007 to Mar 2009) as the next key level. The exact 78.6% level depends on counting from intraday highs/lows or daily, or (for more precision) bifurcation points, but a reasonable level to use is 1375. Before we get there, we have another typical turn level ahead, 1352, where the recent wave C from the July 2010 low to now gets around 61.8% of the prior wave A from March 2009 to April 2010. A typical relationship in a sharp or "zigzag" correction is for waves A and C either to be equal or to relate by 61.8%.

If this is a wave 2, the 78% level is really the point of no return. Theoretically a wave 2 can go 99%, but the odds say once past 78% then almost always this was not a wave 2. I can make a stronger case that once a wave 2 goes much past 62%, it is unlikely to be a wave 2, and statistically once past the repetition level of 70.7%, it rarely is a wave 2. The prime exception is a wave 2 that retraces a really sharp drop of the sort we had back in 2008 (call it a "crash"). The role or psychology of a wave 2 is to make the vast majority of market participants believe the sharp drop was an anomaly and the market is back to the prior trend. The sharper the fall, the further the comeback.

Psychology may also come into play on the two-year anniversary of the Mar 6 low. Interesting is that we bottomed intraday at 667, and are close to the double, at 1334. Whether enough astrology or Gann traders are still out there, this might cause a stutter.

Finally a lot of pundits have been comparing this market to April 2010, where the market went into a three-week trading range with a couple of sharp drops that were recovered before we bifurcated down. The high was in the middle of this range, and the eventual bifurcation down that led to the Flash Crash occurred about a week after the top. The implication is we have begin a three week or so plateau punctuated by a final high (1330? 1334?) that will be followed by another sharp and deep drop. One of the best discussions of this comes from AllAboutTrends:

While a slight pop to say 1330 may mark the end, or a stutter around 1334, more likely we bump along the upper trendline up to 1350-1375 before a serious pause occurs. Given the trend slope of 1.5 pts a day, this points to a turn around 20 or more trading days out, or around the vernal equinox. We might test the midline again before then, but don't get too excited.