A Pill for Psychological Pain? . . . “The idea—that a drug designed to alleviate physical pain should reduce the pain of social rejection—seemed simple and straightforward based on what we know about neural overlap between social and physical pain systems. To my surprise, I couldn’t find anyone who had ever tested this idea,” [psychologist C. Nathan] DeWall said.

Psych Sci

Studies suggest that the similar linguistic descriptions of social and physical pain extend beyond metaphor, and demonstrate overlap in the neurobiological systems underlying physical pain and social pain (DeWall & Baumeister, 2006; Eisenberger, Lieberman, & Williams, 2003; Way, Taylor, & Eisenberger, 2009). In the present experiments, we examined one functional consequence of the hypothesis that social and physical pain rely on shared neurobiological systems—whether acetaminophen, a common physical pain reliever, also reduces social pain.

Figure 2 (

).

Differential ACC response to expectancy violation and social feedback.

(a)

A three-dimensional rendering of the medial surface of the brain illustrates a functional dissociation between dorsal (

dACC

) and ventral (

vACC

) anterior cingulate. A whole-brain voxel-by-voxel ANOVA was used to identify voxels that showed a significant main effect (P

less than

0.001, uncorrected) of expectancy violation ( blue ) and a main effect of feedback type ( yellow ).

[PDF]

Eisenberger, Lieberman, and Williams (2003), writing in Science , described a game they created to expose individuals to social rejection in the laboratory. The authors measured the brain activity in 13 individuals at the same time as the actual rejection took place, and later obtained a self-report measure of how much distress the subject had experienced. Distress was correlated at r=.88 with activity in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC).

Acetaminophen has a relatively short half-life, lasting approximately 4 hr, which means that it is unlikely that acetaminophen had a cumulative effect in our experiments. Our finding that acetaminophen reduced hurt feelings over time could be due to a combination of not feeling hurt and having a greater ability to reappraise the rejection experience.

not

higher

higher

Did you consider the negative consequences of acetaminophen?

Did your IRB have anything to say about this (there was NO info in the paper on institutional approval or the signed consent procedure with participants)?

How did you decide on your dosing regimen?

Why 3 weeks, when the half-life is only 4 hrs?

Instructions say "do not use for more than 10 days without doctor's permission." Was an MD involved in the study?



What do you know about the mechanism of action? For more info, see Acetaminophen from Frank J. Dowd.

And most critically, why did you choose acetaminophen, rather than aspirin, ibuprofen, or naproxen?

Related to this, why did the first version of the manuscript have "Tylenol" in the title? 1

Furthermore, many studies have shown that being rejected can trigger aggressive and antisocial behavior, which could lead to further complications in social life (DeWall, Twenge, Gitter, & Baumeister, 2009; Warburton, Williams, & Cairns, 2006). If acetaminophen reduces the distress of rejection, the behavioral consequences of rejection, such as antisocial behavior, may be reduced as well. Indeed, our fMRI results showed that acetaminophen diminished reactivity in the dACC and amygdala, brain regions that have been linked to aggression (Denson, Pedersen, Ronquillo, & Nandy, 2009; Eisenberger, Way, Taylor, Welch, & Lieberman, 2007). It would therefore be worthwhile to explore whether acetaminophen reduces the aggressive consequences of social rejection.

...applauded the investigators' research efforts. "It is particularly difficult to get research funding to study old, cheap, unpatented, over-the-counter drugs, so I congratulate the authors on doing this," he said. Dr. Charlton, who [was] editor-in-chief of Medical Hypotheses and professor of theoretical medicine at the University of Buckingham, United Kingdom, agreed that different sorts of pain are often related, so there is good reason to assume that acetaminophen or paracetamol may benefit those who suffer any type of pain of unpleasant feelings, including some types of depression. However, he noted that the same effect would likely apply to aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and opiates, "about which there is more evidence," he said.

This work was funded by grants from the National Institute of Mental Health (MH-65999) and the Gulf Atlantic Group, Inc.

ADDENDUM

Psychological Science.

Here are two other papers that use the brand name Tylenol:

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

References

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Psychological Science PMID: Dewall CN, Macdonald G, Webster GD, Masten CL, Baumeister RF, Powell C, Combs D, Schurtz DR, Stillman TF, Tice DM, & Eisenberger NI (2010). Acetaminophen Reduces Social Pain: Behavioral and Neural Evidence.PMID: 20548058

Science

Pain

Perspectives on Psychological Science

Psychol Bull.

Pain

Nat Neurosci

[PDF]

Perspectives on Psychological Science

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

It's not just for headaches anymore! The active ingredient in TYLENOL® (acetaminophen, also known as paracetamol ) has been shown to ease the pain of social rejection. Wouldn't it be great if you could pop an over-the-counter medication to lessen the hurt of being excluded from that grad student party? Of being ostracized by all your old friends? Even disowned by your family and becoming homeless? The journal article, which was promoted by press release six months ago, has finally appeared online ( Dewall et al., 2010 ). An excerpt from the December 2009 press release is below.Perhaps because there's no clear mechanistic basis for such an idea? The authors themselves never proposed one either. One might expect that a psychopharmacological experiment with a drug that can cause serious liver damage would be conducted with a specific hypothesis in mind and some basic knowledge about how the drug is thought to work, but we didn't see that here. Granted, that would not be typical fare for. So instead the rationale given by Dewall et al. (2010) is partially linguistic, partially based on a neuroimaging study ( Eisenberger et al., 2003 ):The "shared neurobiological systems" are thought to be located in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), a brain structure that contains discrete regions responsive to physical pain ( Kwan et al., 2000 ). Interestingly, externally applied vs. self-administered thermal pain activate anatomically distinct areas of the ACC ( Mohr et al., 2005 ). Furthermore, it is not at all clear whether the same regions of ACC represent social pain and the affective components of physical pain. In a study designed to dissociate expectancy violations from social rejection, the dorsal ACC was activated when expectations were violated, while ventral ACC (quite distant from the physical pain regions) was activated by social rejection ( Somerville et al., 2006 ).At any rate, participants in the Eisenberger et al. (2003) study took part in a computerized ball-tossing game while being scanned. Initially, two fictitious players included the scanned subject in the game, but then started to exclude him/her. This was the “social exclusion” condition, which was compared to the inclusion condition. But it happens to be the case that this paper was singled out as one of the worst of the "voodoo correlation" violators by Vul and his colleagues , since it reported a statistically unlikely value based on a non-independent analysis:A correlation of r=.88 between dACC activity and self-reported distress is implausibly high... But I'll stop here, and point to Lieberman, Berkman, and Wager's (2009) reply to Vul et al.That brings us to the present study by Dewall et al. (2010) . In Experiment 1, 30 participants (24 women, 6 men) took one 500 mg acetaminophen pill immediately after waking up and another 500 mg an hour before going to sleep (1,000 mg per day for 3 weeks). The other 32 participants (24 women, 8 men) took the same dosing of placebo for 3 weeks. Each evening, subjects filled out the the Hurt Feelings Scale (the "today" version) to report how much social pain they had experienced that day. Despite the fact that the half life of acetaminophen is 4 hours, it took about 10 days for the drug group to report significantly lower hurt feelings than the placebo group. The difference on day 21 was greatest (p < .005). However, the difference in change-over-time slopes between the two groups was only marginally significant (p ≤ .10). The explanation of the time course for these effects was unclear:In Experiment 2, the dose was upped to 2,000 mg acetaminophen per day for 3 weeks. Instructions were given to refrain from drinking entirely, since alcohol can potentiate liver damage when taken with acetaminophen. In 2009, an FDA panel made a recommendation to lower the maximum daily dose from 4,000 mg (to an unspecified value). The panel also endorsed limiting the maximum single dose of the drug to 650 mg, down from the current 1,000 mg dose (which was given in Exp. 2). At the end of the three week period, the cyberball exclusion fMRI study was run. The acetaminophen group showed less activity in dACC in response to social exclusion, but they didreport lower hurt feelings.Hmm. As an aside, here's another puzzling observation. If it's been claimed that "social exclusion hurts" ( Macdonald & Leary, 2005 ), then why does the experience of social exclusion result intolerance for physical pain andpain thresholds ( DeWall & Baumeister, 2006 )?Next, I have a series of questions for the authors:I was also alarmed by the wild extrapolation from exclusion in a laboratory video game to purported increases in aggressive violence:I'm sure the 24 women in the placebo condition felt like committing mass murder after being excluded from a game of cyberball. Better put them on TYLENOL®.The Medscape article on the study had prominent kudos from Bruce G. Charlton, MD, who:One last question arose when I checked funding for the study:The grant number was misreported, it's MH065559 , not MH-65999.And funding from the Gulf Atlantic Group, Inc. ?? Trying to trace that entity has been like navigating a maze, an endless series of shell corporations:http://haverlandprince.com/http://www.texpacfunding.com/http://www.gainagroup.com/http://pcigroupltd.com/But maybe it's really Gulf Atlantic Funding Group Inc ? -- no, that's mortgages.OR how about: Gulf Atlantic Group Incorporated in Tallahassee, FL (where one of the authors is located)?Or maybe it was just another typo...Original name of the article was: DeWall C. N., MacDonald, G., Webster, G. D., Masten, C., Baumeister, R. F., Powell, C., Combs, D., Schurtz, D. R., Stillman, T. F., Tice, D. M., & Eisenberger, N. I. (in press). Tylenol reduces social pain: Behavioral and neural evidence.DeWall, C. N., Stillman, T. F., MacDonald, G., Webster, G. D., Finkel, E. J., Tice, D. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2010). Can Tylenol boost self-esteem? Effects of acetaminophen on perceived social threat and social self-esteem. Manuscript in preparation. (Intended outlet:).DeWall, C. N. (2008). Effects of Daily Acetaminophen on Social Emotions: Can Two Tylenol Overcome Heartbreak? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society of Personality and Social Psychology. Albuquerque, NM.DeWall CN, Baumeister RF (2006). Alone but feeling no pain: Effects of social exclusion on physical pain tolerance and pain threshold, affective forecasting, and interpersonal empathy , 91, 1–15.Eisenberger NI, Lieberman MD, Williams KD. (2003). Does rejection hurt? An FMRI study of social exclusion 302:290-2.Kwan CL, Crawley AP, Mikulis DJ, Davis KD. (2000). An fMRI study of the anterior cingulate cortex and surrounding medial wall activations evoked by noxious cutaneous heat and cold stimuli 85:359-74.Lieberman M, Berkman E, Wager T. (2009). Correlations in Social Neuroscience Aren't Voodoo: Commentary on Vul et al. (2009) , 4 (3), 299-307Macdonald G, Leary MR. (2005). Why does social exclusion hurt? The relationship between social and physical pain 131:202-23.Mohr C, Binkofski F, Erdmann C, Büchel C, Helmchen C. (2005). The anterior cingulate cortex contains distinct areas dissociating external from self-administered painful stimulation: a parametric fMRI study 114:347-57.Somerville LH, Heatherton TF, Kelley WM. (2006). Anterior cingulate cortex responds differentially to expectancy violation and social rejection . 9, 1007-1008.Vul E, Harris C, Winkielman P, Pashler H (2009). Puzzlingly High Correlations in fMRI Studies of Emotion, Personality, and Social Cognition 4(3), 274-290.Way BM, Taylor SE, Eisenberger NI (2009). Variation in the mu-opioid receptor gene (OPRM1) is associated with dispositional and neural sensitivity to social rejection 106, 15079–15084.