Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul voted against an emergency response coronavirus bill Thursday afternoon after his proposed amendment to the bill was turned down.

The bill had already received more than 60 affirmative votes, which was more than it needed to pass, when Paul voted against it. The bill passed 96-1.

"Earlier today on the Senate floor, I said that while I support an all-hands-on-deck response to the coronavirus, we should cut out waste and take money from less urgent spending, such as what we are wasting overseas, to put into that response effort," Paul said in a statement after his vote. "We don’t have to borrow more money. We just have to start setting our own priorities."

The U.S. Senate voted earlier Thursday to table an amendment from Paul after the junior senator from Kentucky threatened to hold up the legislation if his amendment did not receive a vote.

The House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly to approve $8.3 billion in emergency aid Wednesday to combat the novel coronavirus, which has caused 11 deaths in the United States so far.

Before a scheduled Thursday afternoon vote on the bill, Paul put forth the amendment, which proposed cuts to State Department Cultural Exchange programs and reduces funding for the United States Agency for International Development, among other things.

You may like:Bloom Elementary teacher beats coronavirus isolation with digital drum circle for students

Speaking from the Senate floor Thursday morning, Paul said that “I think we should not let fear or urgency cause us to lose our minds and cause us to act in an irresponsible fashion.”

“I’m not opposed to the emergency funding, but I think the emergency funding should be gotten from elsewhere in the budget," Paul said.

“We want to respond and make sure we are providing resources to our medical professionals and researchers," he added. "That’s important, and I support that.”

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., spoke in opposition to Paul's amendment, saying that it would "decimate programs that fund the foreign policy priorities of both the administration and the Congress.”

Read more:Why the coronavirus couldn't have come at a worse time for reeling Appalachian Kentucky

The Senate ended up voting 80-16 to kill the amendment, with a vote on the coronavirus bill scheduled shortly thereafter.

Previously, Paul said he would hold up the coronavirus bill if he did not have the chance to present and get a vote on his amendment.

"If we don't get the amendment, we can stay here all weekend for all I care," Paul told Trish Turner of ABC News Wednesday.

This is not the first time Paul has opposed legislation that involves large governmental spending. In July, Paul opposed a bill to extend funding for the 9/11 Victim Compensation Fund, which had widespread bipartisan support, on the grounds that "any new spending ... should be offset by cutting spending that's less valuable."

Kelsey Cooper, Paul's communications director, told The Courier Journal Thursday that Paul was "elected to the Senate because Kentuckians know he will always put them first, and that means holding government accountable for wasteful spending that would be much better served funding dire and immediate issues here at home."

"Sen. Paul understands the importance of funding specific issues, especially emergency needs, which is why he has consistently provided solutions to pay for them, as is the case today with his amendment," Cooper said.

Related:Rand Paul blocks legislation to help 9/11 first responders

Contributing: Emma Austin. Contact Ben Tobin at bjtobin@gannett.com and 502-582-4181 or follow on Twitter @TobinBen. Support strong local journalism by subscribing today: subscribe.courier-journal.com.