Language / Язык: ENG RUS

The 2017 World Championship (Anaheim, USA) was remarkable for its level of event organization, Lasha Talakadze´s record, as well as an incredible number of forgone sets - in some weight categories there were more than 50%.

However, with all due respect to the hard work of athletes and their coaches, it is necessary to objectively analyze the competitive results. There is a generally accepted characteristic of competitive reliability: 50% of attempts made are satisfactory performance, 66.7% are good and 83.3% are excellent.

Let's try to objectively look at the problem of competitive reliability. Strangely enough, from time to time in many national teams a so-called “zero epidemic” occurs, when several people from a team perform extremely unstable or receive zero.

The term "competitive reliability" was invented about 40 years ago due to the need to develop scientifically based methods for monitoring competitive activity. Back in 1965, three members of the USSR national team could not cope with the starting weights at the European and World Championships. Due attention was not paid to this and four athletes of the USSR national team received zero marks at the 1972 Olympic Games. Analysis of competitive reliability showed that the implementation of attempts at the world championships over the past 25 years has fluctuated only within the "satisfactory" range.

The main factors for these failures were: incorrect starting weight selection, incorrect strategy of performance, the athlete’s technical training low level. Also one of the reasons was called the low level of moral - volitional qualities of athletes. As it is known, modern sports psychology suggests that if an athlete has poor technique or a physical fitness low level, even very strong moral - volitional qualities are not able to eliminate these shortcomings.

Many coaches and scientists agree that the main reasons for the athlete’s failure are the psychological factors of mobilization, technical instability and incorrect warm-up.

I believe that the last one is the most important factor. The quality of the warm-up to prepare an athlete to perform competitive exercises mainly depends on the optimal formation of muscle and intramuscular coordination. Stable warm-up exercising creates confidence in the athlete and ensures the full realization of his potential on the competitive platform.

My personal observations from functional training and Weightlifting trainings and competitions show that many athletes simply do not understand the importance of the overall workout. Many athletes do the minimum overall workout (some even skip it) and immediately begin to perform competitive exercises. Some athletes perform various special jerk exercises (muscle snatch, head press, squat press, dropping under the barble). At the same time, while performing the warm-up in the clean, most athletes immediately perform the clean.

Practice shows that in recent years, the duration of the overall workout in many teams has declined significantly. Perhaps this is due to the large number of warm-up sets. But the problem lies in the fact that from the point of view of physiology, in order for the muscular and nervous systems to fully engage in the work, it is the qualitative general warm-up that is needed. Snatch and clean for a professional athlete is a fairly monotonous and familiar work that does not allow the optimal intermuscular and intramuscular coordination full inclusion.

My observations at international competitions, unfortunately, indicate that the “common culture” of warm-ups is far from ideal.

On average, athletes begin to warm up 35-50 minutes before entering the platform. The total warm-up lasts from 1 to 5 minutes maximum (at best, duck walk, hand rotation, torso exercises, everything is done very reluctantly, as a rule).

A special snatch warm-up lasts 20-45 minutes, most often includes power snatch and hang and squat also, muscle snatch, head and squat press - a total of about 9-15 sets and 14-25 lifts. The exception is made by Asian athletes, whose warm-up can be 1.5-2 times longer. The difference between the last warm-up approach and the first attempt on the platform is 2-5 kg for women and 5-15 kg for men.

Asian women very often lift a barbell during warm-ups with the weight that equals to the barbell weight on the platform. When I saw it for the first time, I could not believe my eyes. But let's remember the specifics of psychological preparation - it differs everywhere.

The average rest interval between the last warm-up approach and the first attempt on the platform is from 2 to 6 minutes. It is more difficult between the first and second and second and third sets: from my experience I would say that sometimes you had to wait 15-18 minutes, do additional warm-up and getting mobilized in such situations is really not easy.

Special warm-up in the clean is usually shorter - 14-35 minutes. As a rule those are 8-13 sets. In the overwhelming majority of cases, athletes simply perform the clean . With low weights athletes often perform hang clean and do not sit completely, the jerk is performed without stopping in the scissors and without a clear fixation of the bar above the head.

I would like to remind you all that the successful implementation of competitive exercises requires the most effective neuromuscular coordination, concentration of force in active phases, and relaxation in the passive phase. Application of the driving exercises in the competitive warm-up will allow you to “feel” the bar and the movement. As an example: high pull to practice power position, clean squat press, stop for 2-3 seconds in the jerk in the fixation phase.

Unfortunately, the quality warm-up underestimation takes place today and therefore athletes get “zero marks” and injuries at competitions.

My coach always taught me that there are no trifles in sports: everything matters and sometimes much more than we imagine. I believe that a conscientious approach to general and special warm-up, both in training and in competitions, can greatly contribute to stabilizing the technique, reducing the number of unsuccessful attempts and the number of injuries.

TRAIN TOGETHER – TRAIN RIGHT