drejofvalenwood:

thatassholesaid: celtyradfem: I wish the authorities would treat this seriously. They could find out which men are pedophiles by monitoring this but no, gross predatory men have the right to privacy women do not.

I’m guessing “barely legal” means that they’re 18, right? So, they are… So….you expect people to take you seriously, when apparently all you know about porn is what you’ve read in Christian magazines? Barely legal porn isn’t 15-16 year olds. It’s adult women who just look younger. And before you start bitching about “well it’s STILL sexualizing teenage girls”, no. Men who like youthful-looking women are not fucking pedophiles. Some older women also go after younger looking guys. Still not pedophilia. Not exactly legal, but not pedophila either. Which brings me to my next point: the cut off point for pedophilia is 11-13 years of age. So, literally, a child. If you come out and claim you’ve actually seen porn where the girl was within that age range or younger, you’re lying, because 1. it’s easy for the feds to pick up on that shit, and 2. you’d need to be on the deepweb, because it’s illegal everywhere else, and I don’t think you’re intelligent enough to know how to get to the deepweb. Also, do you not realize that not all women are forced into porn or are “pimped out”? What if they actually just want to do it? Women have brains, just in case you hadn’t noticed.

Am I supposed to take you seriously when you are defending barely legal porn? You are defending men who are sexualising teenagers but want to avoid consequences so they use a legal loophole. Sexual predators do that all the time.



If you bothered to read my responses you would see that I already know they use women who are 18 and older. They also use minors for porn as well pretty much every major porn company has been caught using underage girls, trafficked women. It is just that they get away with it because they have a lot of money and connections.



Your evo psych argument is bullshit. Men wanting teenage girls does not make sense from an evolutionary standpoint. Teenage girls are not going to birth healthy children because their bodies are not developed many teenage girls die in childbirth because their bodies aren’t capable of giving birth safely. They are not mature enough to be able to be a mother. Women in their twenties and older are far more suitable of being mothers.



Teenagers are still children they are not adults yet. Men masturbating to teenage girls or women who are made to look like them is not going to create a new generation of healthy people. Last time I checked masturbation is not reproduction. So if you are using evo psych arguments which usually try to explain reproductive patterns. What is the point of porn, especially teen porn? Wanking off to porn does nothing to ensure the health of the current or next generation.



In some areas of the world teenage girls are given to men as brides they are often the same age as the teenage girls predatory men want (I find it creepy you pulled the it’s not ‘pedophillia it’s ephebophillia’ defense).



‘Youthful looking women‘ there is plenty of porn with women who are ‘youthful‘ why exactly do they need to have porn with them looking like teenagers? Aren’t women in their twenties good enough? Barely legal porn sexualises teenagers which encourages men to prey on teenagers (and you are sexist for using the term ‘bitching‘).



Actually it isn’t easy for the feds to pick up on because pedophiles keep moving on and there are so many cases for them to go after that it is impossible for them to get to each case.



You do realise that porn by definition is coerced? (You can’t buy consent to sex) Porn is not actually consensual. That you can’t say no on a porn set with consequences (pornographers refuse to pay for noncompliance). You are ignoring how the majority of women want out immediately but can’t leave. How boyfriends and husbands pimp them out and because they are in an abusive relationship they don’t feel they deserve better. How they take drugs and get drunk just to get through a scene (can’t consent under the influence). You want to believe it is consensual because you want to keep watching porn.

“women have brains”

You are so disingenuous, you do not think the women in porn are savvy or making choices that are in their best interest so spare me your bullshit. You do not respect women or think highly of us. You made it quite obvious with the way you just talked to me.



You are justifying pornography with flimsy excuses. This argument is a sleight of hand, you are putting the blame on women for what men do to them and purposefully ignoring the coercive situation they are in. You are trying to take the focus of men’s demands of barely legal porn and porn in general.



You are basically saying ‘well she knew what she was getting into‘ you are not actually giving women any sort of credit. You are assuming they have far more power than they actually have and erase men’s role in the production and demand of porn.

You don’t think highly of women seeing as you seem to think that women who are pimped out aren’t intelligent. Being abused is not a reflection of abuse women’s intelligence it is a reflection of the abuser’s character. ‘Agency‘ does not protect women from abuse.



Seeing as you think that my positions come from ‘christian magazines’ (are you fucking serious?) you do not respect women’s intelligence. How naive do you have to be to think that feminist’s anti porn stance comes from religion. As if the only reason anybody could oppose porn especially teen porn is because of religion.



(via drej-007)