� Revealed: Scalp-Hunted Former Mozilla CEO Brendan Eich Confesses the Full Extent of His Vicious Anti-Gay Animus | Main | Senate Seats Ranked in Likelihood to Flip � Charles Koch Defends Himself Against the Charge of Expressing His Opposition to the Leftist Agenda And yes, as Brendan Eich could tell you, it's now a crime to do so. There will be personal consequences for opposing the left. The consequences will not just be the political ones we all accept -- that is, if we lose on an issue in the normal democratic process, then we lose. We all know to accept that as the cost of being part of the American democracy. No, the new rules are not just that you will lose on the political point, but that you will then be hounded personally for having dared to venture a contrary opinion at all. And no one has accepted that as part of the increasingly high cost of being an American. I have devoted most of my life to understanding the principles that enable people to improve their lives. It is those principles�the principles of a free society�that have shaped my life, my family, our company and America itself. Unfortunately, the fundamental concepts of dignity, respect, equality before the law and personal freedom are under attack by the nation's own government. That's why, if we want to restore a free society and create greater well-being and opportunity for all Americans, we have no choice but to fight for those principles. I have been doing so for more than 50 years, primarily through educational efforts. It was only in the past decade that I realized the need to also engage in the political process.

A truly free society is based on a vision of respect for people and what they value. In a truly free society, any business that disrespects its customers will fail, and deserves to do so. The same should be true of any government that disrespects its citizens. The central belief and fatal conceit of the current administration is that you are incapable of running your own life, but those in power are capable of running it for you. This is the essence of big government and collectivism. More than 200 years ago, Thomas Jefferson warned that this could happen. "The natural progress of things," Jefferson wrote, "is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." He knew that no government could possibly run citizens' lives for the better. The more government tries to control, the greater the disaster, as shown by the current health-care debacle. Collectivists (those who stand for government control of the means of production and how people live their lives) promise heaven but deliver hell. For them, the promised end justifies the means. Instead of encouraging free and open debate, collectivists strive to discredit and intimidate opponents. They engage in character assassination. (I should know, as the almost daily target of their attacks.) This is the approach that Arthur Schopenhauer described in the 19th century, that Saul Alinsky famously advocated in the 20th, and that so many despots have infamously practiced. Such tactics are the antithesis of what is required for a free society�and a telltale sign that the collectivists do not have good answers. Rather than try to understand my vision for a free society or accurately report the facts about Koch Industries, our critics would have you believe we're "un-American" and trying to "rig the system"...

Meanwhile, the Unleashed Left is also calling for "global warming deniers" to be prosecuted for manslaughter. Sonny Bunch has written a post on The Illiberal Left, which is 90% of it. Though he does note one lefty, Michelle Goldberg, worrying in the Nation about the left's sudden embrace of Progressive-themed fascism. t�s increasingly clear that we are entering a new era of political correctness. Recently, we�ve seen the calls to #CancelColbert because of something outrageous said by Stephen Colbert�s blowhard alter ego, who has been saying outrageous things regularly for nine years. Then there�s the sudden demand for �trigger warnings� on college syllabi, meant to protect students from encountering ideas or images that may traumatize them; an Oberlin facultydocument even suggests jettisoning �triggering material when it does not contribute directly to the course learning goals.� At Wellesley, students have petitioned to have an outdoor statue of a lifelike sleepwalking man removed because it was causing them �undue stress.� As I wrote in The Nation, there�s pressure in some circles not to use the word �vagina� in connection with reproductive rights, lest it offend trans people. � At times like this, politics contract. On the surface, the rhetoric appears more ambitious and utopian than ever�witness, for example, the apparently sincere claim by Suey Park, creator of the #CancelColbert hashtag, that Twitter activists intend to �dismantle the state.� But at the same time, activism becomes less about winning converts and changing the world and more about creating protected enclaves and policing speech. "Policing" speech is a bit of euphemism. What is objectionable here is that we have historically understood speech to be a mode of persuasion -- but that many (and more and more each day) see political "activism" to consist primarily of coercion -- intimidation, and the infliction of genuine personal harm on someone for having dared to raised his voice in opposition. But they don't call this fascism. They call it "social justice." Even this idiot sees the problem: If this is the gay rights movement today � hounding our opponents with a fanaticism more like the religious right than anyone else � then count me out. If we are about intimidating the free speech of others, we are no better than the anti-gay bullies who came before us. -- Andrew Sullivan on "The Hounding of Brendan Eich" On the other hand, Dave Wiegel sees little problem at all.



posted by Ace at



| Access Comments posted by Ace at 06:29 PM









Recent Comments Recent Entries Search Polls! Polls! Polls! Frequently Asked Questions The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick Top Top Tens Greatest Hitjobs