Article content continued

Metchosin Coun. Andy MacKinnon, who made the resolution, agreed, saying trees over 250 years old are a finite resource that fuel the tourism economy and recreation and should be retained for future generations. He argued only 13 per cent of old-growth forests are protected, which placed Vancouver Island at “high ecological risk.”

“Our old-growth forests are not a renewable resource,” he said.

However, some Vancouver Islanders such as Cowichan Valley Coun. Al Sebring were against the move, maintaining municipalities should focus on local issues such as roads, water and sewer and not old-growth forests, the Site C dam or anti-poverty legislation.

Charlie Cornfield, a councillor in Campbell River, and Port Hardy Coun. Fred Robertson added the issue should be debated regionally because it only affected the Island communities. “The motion could have a significant impact on the social fabric of small forest-dependent communities like Port Hardy,” Robertson said. “Nobody has talked to us or the First Nations.”

The UBCM committee had recommended the motion be heard locally, but MacKinnon asked that it be raised at the convention. In 1992, delegates also supported a resolution for old-growth forest that asked the province to “take the necessary steps to ensure that the proposed protected areas are not compromised before the Protected Areas Strategy has been completed.”

The province has said there are more than 250,000 square kilometres of old-growth forests in B.C., of which 45,000 sq. km. are fully protected, according to the UBCM. It also stated that of 19,000 sq. km. of Crown forest on Vancouver Island, 8,401.25 sq. km. are considered old growth, but only 3,130 sq. km. are available for timber harvesting.

But MacKinnon, a biologist who previously worked with the Ministry of Forests, claims those numbers are inflated, and if it only included productive land they would be much smaller.

ksinoski@postmedia.com

twitter.com/ksinoski