We know that Representative Rashida Tlaib from Michigan was accused by her own father of committing residency fraud so she could run for office in the district she currently serves.

A deeper dive into her past shows that she worked with a man who for years was accused of massive sexual abuse and who still is a leader of the American Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee.

We reported in July that Representative Tlaib’s father accused his ‘daughter of the year’ Rashida of lying and reporting that she lived in her father’s home in order to run for office in his district –

TRENDING: BREAKING REPORT: President Trump to Nominate Amy Coney Barrett to Replace Ginsburg on the Supreme Court

It turns out that Rashida’s father isn’t the only man whom she has had a rough relationship with. According to a letter uncovered here, Rashida once reported that she had been sexually abused by a man named Imad Hamad.

In a May 31, 2013 letter to the ADC’s national president, Warren David; its national board chairman, Safa Rifka; Barbara McQuade, U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan; and Gail Cober, field director of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s Detroit office, Rashida wrote: “I was a victim of Imad Hamad’s 15 years ago and regret that I did not have the courage to report it to the appropriate authorities…Imad’s sexual advances were aggressive. He made references to my breasts, played with my hair when I was on the phone, and made sexual comments throughout the day…”

Imad is masquerading as a civil rights activist, yet he was accused by 15 women of committing sexual abuse. Also, he visited the White House, advised the Feds on national security issues, and even got together with Eric Holder and Bill Clinton.

You just can’t make up this stuff up …

Below Imad is pictured with Bill Clinton –

Below are more pictures of Hamad –

The tragedy of this whole case is that Imad Hamad was eventually cleared of all charges. Evaluating the material evidence in the case based on merit alone shows that the allegations by some of the victims was overwhelming. It consisted of multiple sworn affidavits; the testimonies were detailed, consistent, had no internal or external contradictions, and provided specific time and place details and corroborating events. Yet this guy walks free.

What sort of people are allowed to enter this country anyway!

Yaacov Apelbaum has more here