Photo via Twitter

As many of you are aware, at the start of this season I set

out to answer a few questions in regards to Ondrej Pavelec. Despite what

numbers were saying many out there were indoctrinated into the belief that it

was the team in front of him, not his play that hampered his performance and

results. I wanted to know, was it the

play in front of him? Or was it his

personal tendencies and shortcomings that were holding him back? How did he compare to Al Montoya behind him?

So throughout the season I have tracked every goal scored on either Ondrej

Pavelec or Al Montoya to find some answers.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

I’ve made the vast majority of my

analysis available throughout the season, and have provided not one, but two updates on the results.

Finally though, I have gone back and reviewed every goal again and have

my results. And let me tell you, they are rather telling.

The Basics

Just a quick note here, I left out win totals and GAA

because I don’t really put much value in either stat. This article explains why and how save percentage is more valuable very well.

Well, let’s just say the basic information is (once again)

pretty strongly stacked against Ondrej Pavelec.

He finished dead last in the league for total goals against, despite

finishing 14th in shots against (the three goalies directly above

him in goals against all faced around 200 more shots this year). His save percentage ranked him 46th

among goaltenders considered “eligible” by NHL standards (reminder – there are

only 30 teams in the league), while Al Montoya finished 17th on the

same list.

The sample size may be smaller for Montoya, but judging

solely based on basic goaltending numbers this season the Jets would have been

much better off with Al Montoya. Would

he have regressed with more playing time? It’s possible, but I find it foolish

to indict him for something that hadn’t happened yet.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

Situations

The first factor I took into account was the situation that

led to goals against the Jets. A huge

argument people have had is that the team played “poorly” in front of Ondrej,

and that this is directly correlated with the high number of goals he allows.

If this is true, we should see a pretty drastic difference in the situations

leading to goals between Ondrej and Al Montoya, as Monty has been able to put

some pretty solid numbers together.

***For

clarification purposes, an “average play” includes any basic breakout, faceoff

loss, controlled zone entry, dump-in, etc. and a “skilled” play is any play

that was created due to a highly skilled move that created an opening

The first thing that stands out to me is the difference in

penalty kill goals against. Could this

be a big factor as to why Pavelec’s numbers are so low? Well, let’s take a look at their numbers

during only 5 on 5 situations.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

Numbers via Extraskater.com

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

As you would expect, both goaltenders numbers do rise. Pavelec’s do rise a little bit more, but

according to Extraskater.com, he still ranks dead last in Sv% among goaltenders

who started at least 50% of their teams games.

He’s still well below the league average, and is still a problem

regardless. So is this an answer? It’s something to be considered, but I have

my doubts.

The second thing I would like to point out is the difference between

sustained pressure goals. Obviously

sustained zonetime requires more movement (and therefore “work” for the goaltender), which would logically increase the likelihood of a goal against. Top goaltenders in the NHL have the

ability to maintain proper positioning and control rebounds in such situations in order to help limit the damage done when their team gets hemmed in their own

zone. As you’ll see shortly, Pavelec

isn’t very good at doing that. Those

issues played a pretty major role in the difference between the two. So while a noticeable difference between the two of them exist, I believe that a portion of that difference is accounted for by Pavelec’s inability to adequately control pucks that came at him.

A final number I found quite interesting has to be the

difference in turnovers resulting in goals.

For a long time the story was that Pavelec was constantly “hung out to

dry” by the defensemen in front of him, and seeing this makes me strongly

believe otherwise. It happens, of

course. Those events stick in people’s

minds, but it doesn’t mean they are regular occurrences. Al Montoya was exposed in that fashion more

often than Pavelec was all year, but his overall ability allowed him to make up

for it in other situations. By no means do I see this as a sign of Pavelec “bailing out” his defensemen following turnovers at a higher rate than Montoya.

While concerns exist in regards to the Jets play in their

own end, and it is very clear that the team could use an improvement in that aspect, I cannot

justify it as an excuse for Pavelec’s numbers.

Especially when it’s pretty evident that Al Montoya gets pretty similar

play in front of him as well.

Reasons

The second, and in my opinion most important, factor I

evaluated was why the puck ended up in the net.

Was the goalie completely screened?

Was he out of position? Did he

kick out a rebound that directly led to a goal?

While some of these events are pretty obvious (it’s easy to see a

rebound or deflection that led to a goal), I will admit that evaluating whether

or not a goalie should have stopped a shot is pretty subjective. I went over every goal multiple times (both

immediately following and after the season to eliminate as much emotion as

possible) and took into consideration the opinions of others. I’m pretty confident in my thoughts and

opinions, so here are my final results:

Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you the downfalls of

Ondrej Pavelec. He allows more than

double “out of position” goals than Montoya, substantially more as a result of

rebounds off of his pads, and is beat by shots he should be stopping at a

higher rate as well. All of which are

fields that I would consider to be “preventable” goals, and all of which are things that have hampered his performance throughout the majority of his career.

As a result of this, teams were forced to work a lot harder

for goals against Montoya, loading up the front of the net and looking for

tips, deflections, and shots through traffic.

This is also pretty clearly displayed in the numbers. I just want to point out that despite this

added traffic and having to deal with deflections, he still managed to keep the

percentage of goals scored against him off of rebound down.

In total, 52.2% of all goals scored on Ondrej Pavelec were

deemed to be “preventable”, while only 32.2% on Montoya were seen as the

same. How big of a difference is

this? Well, if Pavelec played to

Montoya’s level this season and cut that 20% difference, he would have allowed

approximately 32 less goals. His save

percentage would have been .920, and the Jets (a team that people constantly

spoke about in regards to how many one goal games they were in) would have

likely been right in the mix for a playoff spot.

Stings a little bit, doesn’t it?

Shot Locations

The final part of my evaluation process was to look at where

the puck was beating goaltenders. This

was mostly to see if there were any glaring problems or differences between the

two.

Things were pretty similar between the two of them in this

aspect of their game. Montoya’s glove

hand was exposed a lot early in the season, but as he saw more games things

started to even out a little bit more. A

major concern in my eyes is how high that percentage is for “open net” goals. A lot of those came from being out of

position, and you would hope your goaltender would at least give himself a

chance at stopping the puck.

Conclusion

With these numbers considered, I find myself even more

flabbergasted at the fact that Pavelec has already been named the starting

goaltender heading into next season. I’m

not surprised given Chevy’s history of decision-making, but it as an extremely

ignorant, nonsensical decision. It’s

clearly evident that there are better solutions out there, and it appears as if

the Jets already had a better solution sitting on the bench all year.

The league handed teams a “get out of jail free” card in the

form of two compliance buyouts. Sadly,

it seems as if Kevin Cheveldayoff is going to dismiss this glorious opportunity

to make right on the biggest contractual mistake he has made thus far. Ondrej Pavelec has consistently produced

replacement-level numbers throughout his career, and these numbers show that

his tendencies are a huge barrier to his success. There have been no signs of this changing in

the past, and I seriously doubt they will change going forward (especially when

it’s been made clear that there will not be a change at the goaltending coach

position).

The Winnipeg Jets can make major improvements in every other

aspect of their team this season, but with Ondrej Pavelec in net I am almost

certain that they are set up for failure.



