Introduction

I now have a book available! You can check it out here and read more about it here.

What is TLA+?

TLA+ is a formal specification language. It’s a tool to design systems and algorithms, then programmatically verify that those systems don’t have critical bugs. It’s the software equivalent of a blueprint.

Why should I use it?

Here’s a simple TLA+ specification, representing people trading unique items. Can you find the bug?

People == { "alice" , "bob" } Items == { "ore" , "sheep" , "brick" } (* --algorithm trade variable owner_of \in [Items -> People] process giveitem \in 1 .. 3 \* up to three possible trades made variables item \in Items, owner = owner_of[item], to \in People, origin_of_trade \in People begin Give: if origin_of_trade = owner then owner_of[item] := to; end if ; end process ; end algorithm; *)

Since we check that the owner of an item is the one trading it away, we should be safe against scams, right? But if we run the model checker, we find that’s not true: Alice could trade an item to herself and, before that process finishes running, resolve a parallel trade giving that same item to Bob. Then the first trade resolves and Alice gets the item back. Our algorithm fails for race conditions, and we know this because TLA+ explored every possible state and timeline.

There’s a few different ways of fixing this. But does our fix work for more than two people? In TLA+, checking that is as simple as People == {"alice", "bob", "eve"} . Does it work if we can trade multiple items at once? variable items \in SUBSET Items . What about if there’s multiple sheep, ore, and bricks? amount_owned = [People \X Items -> 0..5] . What if three people are all trading 1 ore and 1 sheep with each of the other players while Eve also trades Alice 0 brick? If it’s in the possible state space, TLA+ will check it.

Is it hard to use?

Formal methods have a reputation for being difficult to the point where they’re only worth it for critical systems. This means that all of the guides are written under the assumption that the reader is working on a critical system, where they have to know TLA+ inside and out to make absolutely sure that their system won’t accidentally kill people.

If a dangerous bug to you is “somebody dies”, then yes, formal methods are hard. If a dangerous bug to you is “nobody dies but our customers get really mad and we have to spend two weeks tracking down and fixing the bug”, then the small subset of TLA+ you’ll need is actually pretty easy to learn. Just find a beginner-friendly guide and you’re all set.

Where’s a beginner-friendly guide?

Hello! This guide covers the basics of TLA+ in an easy, hands-on way. If you want to start from the beginning, you can learn more about what we’ll cover here. If you want to dive in right away, why not try a whirlwind tour?

Either way, welcome to TLA+!