We did a lot of work. In fact, from the chief minister to the chief secretary, all the way down to the collectors, we had almost 66 meetings just to coordinate the efforts to make sure that all the reforms and the Ease of Doing Business parameters that the Government of India had proposed were met. We have issued 58 new government orders, amended 26 legislations and issued more than 150 circulars internally.We completely revamped the way we give permissions and made them online. Of the 340 parameters on which we were rated, on 324 we could affect changes and the Government of India has approved that we made changes after verifying. In fact, after last year’s rating, we were a little jolted because we were under the impression that our policy was one of the best and the policy was delivering. We woke up, and we immediately ensured that all of our administration was geared up to meet the challenge.A couple: fast-track commercial courts and a comprehensive dispute redress mechanism. It is a challenge across the country and not just Telangana. This is because the ease of doing business is not just about entering a new market, it is not about how quickly you give clearances. It is about what happens when there is a dispute that crops up and how quickly you can resolve it. We will be the first state in the country to come out with a comprehensive dispute redress mechanism. There are issues where international investors have come in and put money and now they are stuck and they believe the government should have acted fast. The government is a continuous process, no matter who is at the helm of affairs.Things should happen in a process-driven manner. Once an investor loses confidence you can’t win it back easily because it takes at least 10 times the effort — to bring in a new investor.More importantly, you have to realise that international investors and institutional investors are not merely looking at the ease of doing business as a parameter to invest. It’s also the cost of doing business and how you can bring it down, and the quality of doing business and how you can improve it. Ease of doing business is more about how you institutionalise changes, how you bring about reforms which are more long-lasting. But the cost of doing business is more about the style of functioning and how as a bureaucracy, as a government, you can help in terms of streamlining the way you function.Well, obviously, I will have to admit that Hyderabad is a well-known brand and it is an attractive investment destination. But the hard reality is that Hyderabad is known only in some specific sectors. So it becomes a challenge when you have to bring in more electronics manufacturing and more aerospace and defence.When you start with a low base, your numbers seem very impressive. But when you start with a significant base, in spite of what you do, in terms of incremental growth, in terms of percentage growth rates, it won’t look that impressive. Once Hyderabad is respected in a certain field, to establish a new line of activity becomes a bit of a challenge.Cities are our economic engines. Whether we like it or not, that’s a hard reality. There is a natural attraction because there is good quality human resources available. There is a natural attraction because of the infrastructure, because of the connectivity, which is undisputable. But at the same time, based on resources, we can certainly have more and more industries come up in other districts. No matter how hard you try as a government, the fact of the matter is 50% of the state’s GDP comes from Hyderabad today. So, while protecting brand Hyderabad and while ensuring that Hyderabad retains its edge in terms of the kind of sheen it has, the challenge is to industrialise even tier-II, tier-III cities. We have risen to the occasion and we are pushing as much as we can into the districts. There are different pockets within Telangana which have got inherent advantages and we will continue to push industrialisation there.Well, we are not competing with Andhra alone. We are competing with the rest of the country and the rest of the world as well. If you look at it, Andhra and Telangana can be complementary to each other. Andhra has certain advantages that we don’t have. Andhra has a huge coast line that we don’t. We have a city like Hyderabad which obviously they don’t have. We can work with each other in terms of leveraging each other’s resources. If there was one state that we had to share a rank with, we would have preferred it to be Andhra Pradesh. In fact, in 2024, when the people of both states look back, they should feel that the bifurcation has helped both states. They should feel that by competing with each other in terms of policy reforms, in terms of attracting investments, we have done much better than our parent state.I am aware of the Golden Mile project that you are talking about and it’s in a very advanced stage in the Supreme Court where the final hearing is in a couple of weeks. I agree that when government lands end up in dispute it definitely shows us in poor light.Streamlining of revenue records is something that we are working on. There was a pilot project that has been successfully completed. So, hopefully we will replicate it across the state and more so around the city of Hyderabad where this problem is more rampant. There is a problem and a solution is being worked out.