Congratulations, taxpayers of America: You’ve just spent $412,930 on a “scientific” paper on the “relationship between gender and glaciers.”

That’s what the National Science Foundation dropped on “Glaciers, gender and science,” 10,000-plus words of gobbledygook from University of Oregon prof Mark Carey.

Sure, that’s roughly 40 bucks a word — but many of them are big words.

The study urges scientists to take a “feminist political ecology and feminist postcolonial” approach when studying melting ice caps and climate change. Hey, it’s not really global doom unless it comes with full-bore cutting-edge social-justice buzzwords.

Another taste: “The feminist glaciology framework generates robust analysis of gender, power and epistemologies in dynamic social-ecological systems, thereby leading to more just and equitable science and human-ice interactions.”

More just science — and human-ice interactions. Wow.

Governments across the planet are spending countless billions to combat climate change — when the models that supposedly justify those outlays can’t explain why global temperatures have been flat for nearly two decades now. Yet federal funds are going for a feminist take on climate.

Almost makes you wonder if science really has much of anything to do with all the noise over climate change.