WikiLeaks Ten Year Anniversary Frequently Distorted Facts about WikiLeaks

WikiLeaks is used to spin from power factions exposed by our publications. These counter-attacks often themselves reveal a lot about how modern power groups sustain their reputations and alliances. These reputational attacks have intensified in the context of the approaching US elections. At times the plans of how to harm WikiLeaks reputation through black PR have themselves been revealed through leaks, most notably the plan to take down WikiLeaks by private security companies Palantir, HB Gary and Berico prepared for Bank of America:

HB Gary, Palantir, Berico Plan to take down WikiLeaks

Distortion and repetition of lies are routinely part of these campaigns. Here are several frequently distorted facts that have been aggressively deployed in the wake of the recent Democratic National Party leaks:

1. Is WikiLeaks an “agent” of any government such as Russia? No. WikiLeaks publishes suppressed documents of diplomatic, ethical, historical or moral significance that reveal illegal or immoral behaviour. No government or private enterprise is immune. WikiLeaks is entirely funded by its readers – not by public funds, like the BBC, and not by private foundations, like the vast majority of non-governmental organisations. WikiLeaks is not “anti- western” or “anti-US”. It releases public interest material on governments and corporations - no matter who they are. The claim that WikiLeaks focuses exclusively on the 'West' is false. WikiLeaks has released over 650,000 critical documents relating to Russia under Vladimir Putin. WikiLeaks has exposed Chinese censorship blacklists. WikiLeaks has released 2.3 million emails exposing Assad's regime. The US Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, himself confirmed that as far as the US intelligence agencies are concerned, there is no evidence that Russia is the source for the DNC leaks, and that media speculation that Russia might be behind the DNC leaks amounted to “hyperventilation”. This hyperventilation, combined with an attempt to attack WikiLeaks' independence, serves to distract from the wrongdoing revealed in the DNC leaks – namely subverting the democratic process in nominating the Democratic presidential candidate. It is a dangerous trend reminiscent of the McCarthy era.

2. Does WikiLeaks seek to play a partisan role in the US election? No. WikiLeaks is a publisher. WikiLeaks provides a safe means for whistleblowers to make disclosures to the public on wrongdoing committed by any government or private enterprise. If we havesignificant confidential information on Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton we will publish it. If we have information on any significant power faction or candidate in a globally significant election campaign, we publish it.

3. Has anyone come to physical harm as a result of WikiLeaks publications? No. Despite endless repetition of the phrase “blood on its hands”, the Pentagon had to admit under oath in the 2013 trial of Chelsea Manning in the United States, that they could not find a single person who had come to harm as a result of WikiLeaks release of US diplomatic cables. The Pentagon were heavily invested in finding someone who had come to physical harm in order to erode WikiLeaks political and moral support. They could not find a single case. Have people lost political office? Yes. Have some officials been extremely embarrassed? Yes. Have some ambassadors been posted to a different country? Yes. Have people lost their jobs in an exercise of accountability? Yes. Has it been more difficult for some governments to conduct certain operations that produce civilian casualties or bribe journalists? Yes. But have people come to physical harm as a result of WikiLeaks publications? No.

4. Did WikiLeaks publish the details of millions of Turkish women voters? No. Reports that WikiLeaks published data on Turkish women are false. WikiLeaks didn’t publish the database. Someone else did. What WikiLeaks released were emails from Turkey's ruling party, the Justice & Development Party or AKP, which is the political force behind the country's president, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, who is currently purging Turkey's judiciary, educational sector and press.



https://glomardisclosure.com/2016/07/26/the-who-and-how-of-the-akp-hack-dump-and-wikileaks-release/

5. Did WikiLeaks recently expose visitors to its website to malware? No. WikiLeaks published evidence that malware was used to attack the Turkish government before the recent failed coup. However, this is malware that works in emails, not on websites. WikiLeaks readers are not at risk, unless they explicitly download the attachments and open them on their desktop. However this same risk exists for most “.exe” or “.doc” files downloaded elsewhere from the internet or received by email. As time goes by we flag documents to alert readers.

6. Did WikiLeaks recently expose gay citizens of Saudi Arabia to increased danger? No. The material in the Saudi cables was released in June 2015 and comprises leaked government information - that is data the Saudi government already had, including evidence of Saudi government persecution. The release revealed extensive Saudi bribing of the media, weapons amassed by the Saudi government, its brutal attacks on citizens and on Yemen, and the deals cut with the US and UK to get Saudi Arabia into a key position of the UN Human Rights Council. After WikiLeaks publication of DNC leaks in 2016, over a year after the materal was published, an AP journalist made claims about the 2015 publication but refused to provide evidence when asked to do so. WikiLeaks has still not found evidence for the claims. WikiLeaks has lodged a formal complaint to AP .