Muslim savages setting fire to a helpless captive. Did that happen in the Middle East in 2015? Yes, it did. But it also happened in Scotland in 2004. It was perhaps the worst and most sadistic hate-crime ever committed on British soil, but the mainstream media paid it little attention and long ago ceased to mention it. Meanwhile they have devoted thousands of hours and millions of words to the martyr-cult of Stephen Lawrence. By any objective standard, the murder of a slightly built fifteen-year-old called Kriss Donald was a much worse and much more significant crime:

On 15 March 2004, Donald was abducted from Kenmure Street by five men associated with a local Pakistani gang led by Imran Shahid. The kidnapping was ostensibly revenge for an attack on Shahid at a nightclub in Glasgow city centre the night before by a local white gang, and Donald was chosen as an example of a “white boy from the McCulloch Street area” despite having no involvement in the nightclub attack or in any gang activity. Donald was taken on a 200-mile journey to Dundee and back while his kidnappers made phone calls looking for a house to take him to. Having no success at this, they returned to Glasgow and took him to the Clyde Walkway, near Celtic Football Club’s training ground. There, they held his arms and stabbed him 13 times. He sustained internal injuries to three arteries, one of his lungs, his liver and a kidney. He was doused in petrol and set on fire as he bled to death. (Murder of Kriss Donald, Wikipedia)

Stephen Lawrence died of a single stab-wound inflicted in a chance encounter. He did not suffer greatly. He might have survived. His death was an example of a rare phenomenon: White-on-ethnic murder. Kriss Donald died of multiple stab-wounds inflicted after a premeditated kidnapping. His murderers ensured that he suffered extreme pain. His death was an example of a common phenomenon: ethnic-on-White murder.

It was also the result of the police in Glasgow failing to act against Asian criminals for fear of seeming racist. As I said, by any objective standard the murder of Kriss Donald was much worse and much more significant than the murder of Stephen Lawrence. It was significant for what is said both about the present and about the future. Non-Whites in Britain are committing huge amounts of crime against Whites: murder, rape, robbery, fraud. What will happen as their numbers grow and Britain grows even more enriched? Obviously, an already unacceptable situation will get worse.

This is precisely why the name “Kriss Donald” means nothing to most White Britons, while the name “Stephen Lawrence” has been dinned into their ears for decades. The truth revealed by Donald’s murder is that passive Whites are under threat from violent non-Whites. The lie associated with Lawrence’s murder is that Whites are the violent oppressors of passive non-Whites. This lie has been enthusiastically promoted by the Jewish anti-racist Dr Richard Stone, who has exploited his connections in Britain’s elite to portray British Whites as dangerous and malevolent racists. Stone has undoubtedly encouraged stupid and self-righteous non-Whites to take revenge against Whites.

But let’s be fair. Our vibrant non-Whites at times attack other non-Whites:

How could three tourists have been battered within an inch of their lives by a burglar in the plush London Cumberland hotel? Fatima al-Najjar arrived at Heathrow from her home in the United Arab Emirates in the middle of a Saturday evening and reached her hotel at around 11pm. Barely two hours later, she was lying on the floor of her seventh-storey room, her eye sockets shattered, the side of her head smashed open, her life ebbing away. She was one of three sisters from the UAE who were critically injured by a hammer-wielding burglar almost before their family tourist and shopping trip to London had begun. … My main reason for following this case, though, was because the crime seemed so senseless and the violence so gratuitous. … Any theory, it seemed, was preferred to the possibility that this was a crime born and bred in London and that the Najjar sisters were the most blameless of victims. (How could three tourists have been battered within an inch of their lives by a burglar in the plush London Cumberland hotel?, The Independent, 22nd October 2014)

Mary Dejevsky, the writer of that article, is the same liberal journalist who expressed dismay at a melanin-enriched election in London representing the “worst of Bangladesh” rather the “best of British.” Imagine that: Bangladeshis behaving like Bangladeshis. Who could have foreseen it? That was in June 2014. In October, you’ve seen, she had a new dismay: a senselessly violent crime “born and bred in London.” Well, that’s her liberal label. My label is a little different: “born in London, but bred in Africa.”

The hammer-wielding thug was a Black. Britain is still a White-majority nation, but the more violent and senseless a crime committed here is, the more likely that the criminal is non-White. So the hammer-thug in London was entirely typical. However, his victims were unusual: they weren’t British Whites. Normal service was resumed here:

Gang who kidnapped man then cut off his little finger when his family could not pay £60,000 ransom are jailed for total of 152 years A gang of kidnappers who held a man hostage and cut off his little finger when his family could not pay the £60,000 ransom were jailed today for a total of 152 years. Victim Damien Lowe was abducted on a street in Coventry at gunpoint and bundled into a van where a group of ten masked men kept him without food or water for 31 hours…. The kidnappers were sentenced at Leamington Justice Centre today [with sentences ranging from 12-18 years]. Mr Lowe, 26, from Coventry, West Midlands, said: ‘… My kidnappers kept disappearing and then coming back, always to beat me, harder and harder. When they came in and covered my face I knew something bad was going to happen. That was when they cut my finger off. The pain was unbelievable and I was just crying out and then they just beat me again.’ … His kidnappers kept him bound and gagged in the van, which was parked in a lock-up garage, and beat him with a metal bar before severing his finger. According to the Birmingham Mail, the gang had threatened to cut off another digit for every hour they didn’t receive payment. Mr Lowe’s family scraped together £20,000 to pay the kidnappers, and the 26-year-old was later thrown out of the vehicle on a suburban street, before being found and rushed to hospital. (Gang who kidnapped man then cut off his little finger when his family could not pay £60,000 ransom are jailed for total of 152 years, The Daily Mail, 26th January 2015)

Looking at those faces, I find myself asking a simple question: Why are highly violent, deeply stupid non-Whites like that in my country? And why is the staggering amount of crime committed by non-Whites against Whites never presented by the media to its true extent? How many murders, rapes and beatings were committed against Whites by non-Whites in 2014, for example?

That isn’t a respectable question and the mainstream media don’t investigate it. The suffering of White Britons doesn’t matter. But a report is issued every year about the suffering of a group that matters immensely. The report then receives full coverage in the mainstream media. I issue a trigger warning for the easily disturbed:

Antisemitic attacks in UK at highest level ever recorded Community Security Trust recorded 1,168 incidents against Britain’s Jewish population in 2014, more than double that of the previous year … Antisemitic incidents Manchester, February 2014

Swastikas and the phrase “Jewish slag” daubed on gravestones at a Jewish cemetery. Manchester, March 2014

An identifiably Jewish man was cycling to synagogue when youths jumped out at him, causing him to wobble on his bike. They then surrounded him and called him a “Jew”. He slipped and the group kicked him while he was on the ground. He did not suffer serious injury. London, March 2014

A university student took a photograph of an identifiably Jewish person on a bus and them posted it on Twitter with the comment, “50 retweets and I’ll knock this Jew out”. Norfolk, July 2014

A leaflet found among Israeli produce in a supermarket featured an image of the Israeli flag with the title “The flag of Zionist racist scum”. It read: “Deny the Holocaust? Of course there was a holocaust. What a pity Adolf and Co didn’t manage to finish the job properly!” London, October 2014

Five girls from a Jewish secondary school were approached by a man at a London underground station who said: “Being Jewish is wrong. You are going to die if you carry on being Jewish,” and “I will kill you all after school.” He grabbed one of the girls by the wrist and said: “Come with me and be a Christian”. She kicked him and ran away. (Antisemitic attacks in UK at highest level ever recorded, The Guardian, 5th February 2015)

Note that phrase “identifiably Jewish.” As I pointed out in “Four Woundings and a Funeral,” Jews do not protest about hate-crime when they are attacked as generic Whites. They will exploit an attack only when it is specifically anti-Jewish. And even then they often conceal the full truth for political ends. What colour were the “youths,” the “university student,” and “the man” mentioned above? All of them were non-White, I would suggest.

But what is happening to White schoolgirls while Jewish schoolgirls are having their wrists “grabbed”?

Child sex abuse gangs could have assaulted ONE MILLION youngsters in the UK There could be up to a million victims of child sexual exploitation in the UK, it is feared. Rotherham’s Labour MP Sarah Champion describes it as a “national disaster” and is demanding a taskforce to fight the “horror.” In an exclusive interview with the Daily Mirror the shaken MP has told how she ‘nearly lost her mind’ after victims turned to her for help — unable to trust the police or local council. She is currently getting an average of 10 victims a week coming to her for help. Fighting back tears she told how she feared having a nervous breakdown worried about failing the “amazing women” and her horror after finding out a manual for grooming existed for paedophiles. The MP was speaking after the Government announced they were taking over Rotherham Council for a “fresh start” and sending five commissioners to run the troubled authority. “The day after the first report broke the victims started coming to me. They couldn’t go to the police, they couldn’t go to the council. So who do you go to? For the first three weeks I generally thought I was losing my mind. I nearly lost my mind because of the level of depravity and horror. Listening to what these, now women, had gone through and how they were just left discarded, to flounder on their own. … Talking about her concerns of corruption within the police force she pointed out [that when] the IPCC [Independent Police Complaints Commission] started their investigation within a month they had suspended 14 police officers. … Talking of the cases she has encountered, she told of one horrific case when a girl from Rotherham was traced to a terraced street in Blackpool by youth worker Jane Senior who she employs. “She knew where the girl was because of the queue of men down the street and up the stairs,” the MP said. “There are hundreds of thousands and I think there could be up to a million victims of exploitation nationwide, including right now. Girls in the process of being groomed,” she said. “I have met people from all over the country. If you just think we know at least four big cases each with a couple of thousand each in smallest towns. It’s extraordinary. I want a national taskforce because unless we get that, what’s happened in Rochdale, what’s happened here, will just go on. The nightmare will go on.” … Sarah Champion became Rotherham MP in 2012 after facing a protest walkout by members furious an Asian councillor had not been selected. She says that attitude was indicative of the problems in the town. … (Child sex abuse gangs could have assaulted ONE MILLION youngsters in the UK, The Daily Mirror, 5th February 2015)

To me a Labour MP expressing concern about child rape is a bit like a mosquito expressing concern about malaria. The “nightmare” Sarah Champion identifies is a direct result of two things: mass immigration and anti-racism. The Labour party has been fanatically in favour of both for decades.

Mass immigration imported violent misogynists from the Third World. Then anti-racism allowed them to express their vibrancy not merely without interference from the authorities, but with the active assistance of the authorities. When victims in Rotherham complained to the police, they “were threatened with [prosecution for] wasting police time, they were told they had consented to sex and, on occasion, they were arrested at the scene of a crime, rather than the perpetrators” (see here).

So the British police assist sex-crime if the perpetrators are non-White. But it gets even worse than that: “Two local councillors, one of whom is still serving, and a police officer have been accused of having sex with victims involved in the Rotherham child abuse scandal” (see here and here).

It’s highly likely that all three of the accused men are Pakistani Muslims. It’s also likely that many more councillors and police from that vibrant community have committed the same offence. And not just in Rotherham, but right across the country.

But again: let’s be fair. When Third Worlders behave like Third Worlders, who is really to blame? The criminals or those who allowed them to leave the Third World and enter Britain? The Muslims are criminals, but they aren’t traitors. Britain’s mainstream politicians, officials and journalists are both criminals and traitors:

In 1968 Enoch Powell returned to his native Birmingham to deliver a speech in which he warned of the consequences of uncontrolled immigration. For that outrage against the then embryonic PC orthodoxy he was called “racialist” and “evil” and was deprived of his political career. Yet a Gallup poll showed that 74 per cent of the British public agreed with him and only 11 per cent disagreed. Consider the significance of those figures. They demonstrate that in 1968 the political class abandoned representation of the [overwhelming] majority and identified itself exclusively with the elitist 11 per cent minority. It was able to do so by the anti-democratic device of cross-party consensus, leaving the electorate with nobody to vote for who would execute the popular will. This conspiracy — to give it its proper name — had already been pioneered in 1965 when MPs abolished capital punishment against the known wishes of the overwhelming majority of people in this country. The politicians were joined in their treason by the media, which excluded politically incorrect views from our television screens, radios and newspapers. They were given a pretext to do this by the passing of increasingly tyrannical statutes that progressively suppressed freedom of speech. Enoch Powell’s speech had primarily been directed against Labour’s Race Relations Act 1968, which he rightly saw as an attempt to close down debate on the most important issue affecting the national interest: the artificial engineering of a massive alteration of the demography of Britain. Today, the suppression of freedom of speech has been expanded to cover all areas of contention. (The PC Police State Is Finally Terrorising Even the Police, Gerald Warner, Breitbart, 10th December 2014)

“Treason” is the right word. The Labour MP Sarah Champion says she wants a “national taskforce” to tackle “child sex abuse gangs.” I would go further. I want a national tribunal to identify those responsible for the existence of the gangs. And after those people are identified, I want them prosecuted and punished for treason. Tony Blair and Dr Richard Stone should be at the top of the list, but it should include pretty much the entire British elite that has participated in this treason for the last 50 years. Sarah Champion should be on it too. So should this less famous figure:

Paul Giannasi Paul is a Police Superintendent working within the Ministry of Justice in the United Kingdom. He leads a cross-governmental hate crime programme which brings all sectors of government together to coordinate efforts to improve the response to hate crime from across the criminal justice system. Paul is the UK National Point of Contact to the Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights on hate crime and has worked to share good practice within the OSCE region and within Africa. Paul is also a member of the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) Hate Crime Group and is coordinating the refresh of the ACPO hate Crime Manual which will guide all UK police officers and partners. (Paul Giannasi, 2015)

That’s the internet entry for Paul Giannasi at an organization with a name that is simultaneously ludicrous and sinister: the International Network for Hate Studies. The anti-White, pro-minority ideas spread by organizations like that are responsible for what happened to Kriss Donald in Glasgow and to thousands of girls in Rotherham. And I think men like Giannasi are perfectly happy with the situation. He’s doing well. The money and accolades keep pouring in, and he is much loved by the media. He has a face that goes well with his ideology. Both of them are evil.