Just hours after the media broke the latest allegation that Judge Brett Kavanaugh exposed himself to Deborah Ramirez 35 years ago, they were caught hiding one crucial detail that changes everything.

In an obvious attempt to derail the Supreme Court Justice vote, Democrats are predictably unfurling their tired tactic of accusing good men of sexual misconduct. Outrageously, these virtue-signaling operatives work exhaustively to silence actual sexual assault victims of their congressional abusers in their own party, like Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN), while hypocritically pointing their crooked fingers at individuals with unblemished records and unimpeachable characters.

Democrats have welcomed a small interruption in their fervent witch hunt against President Donald Trump to malign and slander his SCOTUS nominee, Judge Brett Kavanaugh, a man with an almost impossibly impeccable reputation. When trotting out far-leftist activist Christine Blasey-Ford and her vague, unprovable accusation didn’t achieve the desired political results, repugnant Democratic officials summoned plan B — bring forward as many unvettable accusers as possible in a bid to delay the vote at least until after the November elections. Unfortunately for them, their vindictive ploy is falling apart at the seams.

In yet another eleventh-hour attack to forestall the SCOTUS nominee vote, Democrats have produced another female accuser, who claims that Judge Brett Kavanaugh exposed himself to her in the 1983-84 academic school year at Yale University. The allegation, which was hastily published by The New Yorker in time for the impending Blasey-Ford hearing, is intended to secure the final nails in Kavanaugh’s judicial coffin. However, there’s one major issue with the woman’s claim that The New Yorker blatantly attempted to bury.

Although Democrats and the media are portraying it as though Deborah Ramirez has multiple witnesses to corroborate her 35-year-old allegations, not one individual who has backed up her claims was an eyewitness or would even admit that Brett Kavanaugh was at the party. In fact, The New Yorker, which broke the latest apparent “bombshell” accusation, purposefully hid this crucial detail a whopping 10 lengthy paragraphs into their article, hoping readers wouldn’t notice that their publication is nothing more than an unsubstantiated rumor, The Daily Wire points out.

Buried more than 1,000 words into the report, Ronan Farrow and Jane Mayer wrote: The New Yorker has not confirmed with other eyewitnesses that Kavanaugh was present at the party. The magazine contacted several dozen classmates of Ramirez and Kavanaugh regarding the incident. Many did not respond to interview requests; others declined to comment, or said they did not attend or remember the party.

Ronan Farrow could not confirm Kavanaugh was at the party Ramirez describes pic.twitter.com/tAWOm7Cgkm — Philip Wegmann (@PhilipWegmann) September 24, 2018

The allegation, which broke in an article published by Ronan Farrow and Jane Mayer, appears to be no more credible than Blasey-Ford’s blurry accusation, which also remains unconfirmed and uncorroborated. In fact, The New Yorker has jumped the gun in its reckless broadcast, presenting rag-worthy hearsay that it wouldn’t have even considered printing if it had been aimed at anyone on the left side of the political spectrum.

Still, there are quite a few “serious problems” aside from the complete lack of corroborating testimonies placing Kavanaugh at the alleged location, as The Daily Wire points out. Along with the leftist media’s failure to pin credible claims on the esteemed judge, Ramirez is having considerable trouble finding someone who was at the party to confirm that Kavanaugh was even in attendance. In fact, not one of the classmates and friends she cited say that Kavanaugh was the man who committed such an offense or that he was at the party at all.

The classmate, who was not named, said that “she was not present at the incident.” The Times’ report states: Ms. Ramirez herself contacted former Yale classmates asking if they recalled the incident and told some of them that she could not be certain Mr. Kavanaugh was the one who exposed himself.

Additionally, Ramirez admits that she was so drunk during the alleged incident that she lost her ability to walk or speak properly, indicating that her testimony would merely be the unreliable memory of an irresponsible collegiate in a drunken stupor.

Ramirez said that at the party, where students were playing a drinking game, she “quickly became inebriated” because of the large amounts of alcohol she was consuming, adding that she became so intoxicated that she “was on the floor, foggy and slurring her words.”

Most devastating to the allegation is the confession of a former close companion, who maintains that the accuser not only never suggested that any such incident occurred but also that Ramirez remained in a “larger social circle” with Kavanaugh and never raised any issue about him.

The former friend who was married to the male classmate alleged to be involved, and who signed the statement, said of Ramirez, “This is a woman I was best friends with. We shared intimate details of our lives. And I was never told this story by her, or by anyone else. It never came up. I didn’t see it; I never heard of it happening.”

Senate Democrats are investigating a new allegation of sexual misconduct against Brett Kavanaugh. The claim dates to the 1983-84 academic school year, when Kavanaugh was a freshman at Yale University. The woman at the center of the story, Deborah Ramirez, pic.twitter.com/w77mxAGwl0 — NANO (@CeciliaNano) September 24, 2018

Of course, with the hype surrounding Ramirez’s vague allegations, few noticed the “Puerto Rico” shirt she wore for her photo shoot with The New Yorker, which is a likely dig at President Donald Trump. Indeed, everything down to the imagery in her editorial debut reeks of political motivation.

Unsurprisingly, Ramirez, like Blasey-Ford, is a registered Democrat and a very vocal social justice warrior, adding suspicion to her timely allegation. Although Ramirez admitted that she couldn’t remember vital details of her own alleged sexual abuse, her Democrat lawyer coached her for 6 days to ensure that she got her story straight. Not coincidentally, The New Yorker didn’t mention her attorney’s liberal bias until more than 2,100 words into their article.

“In her initial conversations with The New Yorker, she was reluctant to characterize Kavanaugh’s role in the alleged incident with certainty,” the outlet reports. “After six days of carefully assessing her memories and consulting with her attorney, Ramirez said that she felt confident enough of her recollections to say that she remembers Kavanaugh…”

Just like Christine Blasey-Ford’s accusation, Deborah Ramirez’s “bombshell” revelation is nothing more than a political attempt to use our justice system to derail the constitutional process. Republicans must recognize that this is merely the machination of the left’s political witch hunt and move forward with a vote.