User Info: Caster Caster 4 years ago #1 Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, is a controversial character. But there's no denying the emails he has picked up from inside the Democrat Party are real, and he's willing to expose Hillary Clinton.



Now, he's announcing that Hillary Clinton and her State Department was actively arming Islamic jihadists, which includes the Islamic State (ISIS) in Syria.



Clinton as repeatedly denied these claims, including during multiple statements while under oath in front of the United States Senate.



WikiLeaks is about to prove Hillary Clinton deserves to be arrested:



The Reagan administration officials hoped to secure the release of several U.S. hostages, and then take proceeds from the arms sales to Iran, to fund the Contras in Nicaragua.

Sounds familiar?



In Obama's second term, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton authorized the shipment of American-made arms to Qatar, a country beholden to the Muslim Brotherhood, and friendly to the Libyan rebels, in an effort to topple the Libyan/Gaddafi government, and then ship those arms to Syria in order to fund Al Qaeda, and topple Assad in Syria.



Clinton took the lead role in organizing the so-called "Friends of Syria" (aka Al Qaeda/ISIS) to back the CIA-led insurgency for regime change in Syria.



Under oath Hillary Clinton denied she knew about the weapons shipments during public testimony in early 2013 after the Benghazi terrorist attack.



In an interview with Democracy Now, Wikileaks' Julian Assange is now stating that 1,700 emails contained in the Clinton cache directly connect Hillary to Libya to Syria, and directly to Al Qaeda and ISIS.



Wow! Hillary Clinton is a war criminal! Proud Gamer and American. Wow! Hillary Clinton is a war criminal!

User Info: RySenkari RySenkari (Moderator) 4 years ago #2 "With hard work and dedication, you can master the magical properties of your Gem and perform your own dance!"- Pearl, Steven Universe So before we cost Hillary the election, can we undo every single change Ronald Reagan made to society? Unseat his Supreme Court justices (and Bush Sr.'s too, since he wouldn't have been elected without being Reagan's VP), undo his tax cuts, return organized labor to prominence? Because if Reagan did this and still gets to affect society 30 years later, Hillary should get the same pass.

User Info: M_F_H M_F_H 4 years ago #3 And literally 0 people are surprised.



Democrats and liberals gave up on integrity a long time ago so it doesn't matter one bit.

User Info: TrumpTrain TrumpTrain 4 years ago #4 This was out a month ago? How come I am only just hearing about it now?

User Info: Whoapro Whoapro 4 years ago #5 RySenkari posted...

So before we cost Hillary the election, can we undo every single change Ronald Reagan made to society? Unseat his Supreme Court justices (and Bush Sr.'s too, since he wouldn't have been elected without being Reagan's VP), undo his tax cuts, return organized labor to prominence? Because if Reagan did this and still gets to affect society 30 years later, Hillary should get the same pass.

No, we shouldn't get two terrible lying pieces of demonic trash influencing American society for decades beyond how long they deserved to live.



I'd take Hillary not being president for Reagan being Soviet-style erased from history. No, we shouldn't get two terrible lying pieces of demonic trash influencing American society for decades beyond how long they deserved to live.I'd take Hillary not being president for Reagan being Soviet-style erased from history.

User Info: RySenkari RySenkari (Moderator) 4 years ago #6 Whoapro posted...

RySenkari posted...

So before we cost Hillary the election, can we undo every single change Ronald Reagan made to society? Unseat his Supreme Court justices (and Bush Sr.'s too, since he wouldn't have been elected without being Reagan's VP), undo his tax cuts, return organized labor to prominence? Because if Reagan did this and still gets to affect society 30 years later, Hillary should get the same pass.

No, we shouldn't get two terrible lying pieces of demonic trash influencing American society for decades beyond how long they deserved to live.



I'd take Hillary not being president for Reagan being Soviet-style erased from history.



I would too. Let Mike Dukakis fill Clarence Thomas and Anthony Kennedy's Supreme Court seats, and I'd gladly let Trump fill Scalia's. "With hard work and dedication, you can master the magical properties of your Gem and perform your own dance!"- Pearl, Steven Universe I would too. Let Mike Dukakis fill Clarence Thomas and Anthony Kennedy's Supreme Court seats, and I'd gladly let Trump fill Scalia's.

User Info: mizukage2 mizukage2 4 years ago #7 TrumpTrain posted...

This was out a month ago? How come I am only just hearing about it now?



The most likely answer is because it is worthless s*** that only exists by twisting around what is said in these emails until they mean something entirely different. Just like they tried to spin things in all their other batches of 'this time we are totally bringing Hillary down and getting her thrown in jail with the stuff in these emails' junk previously released by Assange. Its nothing but Assange desperately clinging to relevance by turning all the leaks into clickbait with ridiculously over hyped descriptions of what is in the batch. I mean, i never see the right bash the left on anything because the blame game causes more issues than anything-Josh The most likely answer is because it is worthless s*** that only exists by twisting around what is said in these emails until they mean something entirely different. Just like they tried to spin things in all their other batches of 'this time we are totally bringing Hillary down and getting her thrown in jail with the stuff in these emails' junk previously released by Assange. Its nothing but Assange desperately clinging to relevance by turning all the leaks into clickbait with ridiculously over hyped descriptions of what is in the batch.

User Info: Caster Caster (Topic Creator) 4 years ago #8 mizukage2 posted...

TrumpTrain posted...

This was out a month ago? How come I am only just hearing about it now?



The most likely answer is because it is worthless s*** that only exists by twisting around what is said in these emails until they mean something entirely different. Just like they tried to spin things in all their other batches of 'this time we are totally bringing Hillary down and getting her thrown in jail with the stuff in these emails' junk previously released by Assange. Its nothing but Assange desperately clinging to relevance by turning all the leaks into clickbait with ridiculously over hyped descriptions of what is in the batch.

It all depends on what the meaning of "ISIS" is. Proud Gamer and American. It all depends on what the meaning of "ISIS" is.

User Info: pistachio12 pistachio12 4 years ago #9 Caster posted...

Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, is a controversial character. But there's no denying the emails he has picked up from inside the Democrat Party are real, and he's willing to expose Hillary Clinton.



Now, he's announcing that Hillary Clinton and her State Department was actively arming Islamic jihadists, which includes the Islamic State (ISIS) in Syria.



Clinton as repeatedly denied these claims, including during multiple statements while under oath in front of the United States Senate.



WikiLeaks is about to prove Hillary Clinton deserves to be arrested:



The Reagan administration officials hoped to secure the release of several U.S. hostages, and then take proceeds from the arms sales to Iran, to fund the Contras in Nicaragua.

Sounds familiar?



In Obama's second term, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton authorized the shipment of American-made arms to Qatar, a country beholden to the Muslim Brotherhood, and friendly to the Libyan rebels, in an effort to topple the Libyan/Gaddafi government, and then ship those arms to Syria in order to fund Al Qaeda, and topple Assad in Syria.



Clinton took the lead role in organizing the so-called "Friends of Syria" (aka Al Qaeda/ISIS) to back the CIA-led insurgency for regime change in Syria.



Under oath Hillary Clinton denied she knew about the weapons shipments during public testimony in early 2013 after the Benghazi terrorist attack.



In an interview with Democracy Now, Wikileaks' Julian Assange is now stating that 1,700 emails contained in the Clinton cache directly connect Hillary to Libya to Syria, and directly to Al Qaeda and ISIS.



Wow! Hillary Clinton is a war criminal!



Woah Hilary was secretary of state in Obama's second term?!? How come no one told me this.



Oh and source.



Oh and it says wikileaks has yet to release it but apparently this source has all this information. Which one is it? Woah Hilary was secretary of state in Obama's second term?!? How come no one told me this.Oh and source.Oh and it says wikileaks has yet to release it but apparently this source has all this information. Which one is it?