A beloved Brooklyn brunch spot may soon be toast.

For years, Woodland, a Caribbean-fusion restaurant located on a gentrifying stretch between Barclays Center and brownstone-heavy Park Slope, has racked up noise complaints from neighbors. On Wednesday, the State Liquor Authority will decide whether to take away the 7-year-old establishment’s liquor license. If the hot spot has to take bottomless mimosas and rum punch off the menu, owner Akiva Ofshtein says it won’t survive.

“A restaurant with our rent and staff size, without a liquor license, would not stay in business,” Ofshtein tells The Post. He’s white, but believes the crusade against his eatery may be due to the fact that its clientele is mostly black. There are “cultural differences between those who frequent the restaurant and those who live near it,” he says.

Stylish patrons wait on line for hours to get into Woodland’s brunch, which is served until 5 p.m. on Saturdays and 8 on Sundays. Inside the two-story venue — which includes a downstairs lounge — hip-hop blares, often inspiring spontaneous dance-offs among the roughly 2,200 patrons it serves each weekend. A patio, which doesn’t play music, is often the only place conversation can be heard, according to regulars. After the last plate of eggs is served, the party sometimes continues till 2 a.m.

“This is where people shake their asses,” one woman waiting on line on a recent weekend said.

‘Let’s be honest — it’s the demographics. This place brings a crowd they don’t like.’

Critics say that the Woodland bar and restaurant encourages excessive drinking, and that crowds — who sometimes arrive by the busload — spill out onto neighbors’ stoops, occasionally getting violent or defiling property.

Some have also taken issue with Ofshtein operating the business with two men who pleaded guilty to money laundering at a different company. (Ofshtein declined to comment on that.) These are among the 11 issues that the state’s liquor-license-regulating board will hear on Wednesday after years of complaints from both police and neighbors, including a Park Slope resident of 40 years, Patti Hagan.

“I was out gardening the other day and this guy [presumably from Woodland] just stopped and peed into my garden,” says Hagan, who claims she’s also witnessed people vomiting, fighting and getting violent on her street, which parallels the restaurant.

Hagan, a 75-year-old writer who is white, denies that race has anything to do with the complaints she and her neighbors have made over the years. “It’s alcohol,” she says.

The fact that Woodland draws brunchers from all over NYC might also be part of the problem.

“People who are coming from other parts of the city,” she says, “maybe they feel like they can . . . throw fast food wrappers on the street, or pee on people’s gardens.”

But Woodland fans say race is clearly part of the issue for neighbors.

“Let’s be honest — it’s the demographics,” says Gloria Barnor, 27, a nursing student who drove nearly two hours from New Jersey on a recent Sunday to have brunch at Woodland. “This place brings a crowd they don’t like.”

Carla Castillo, 52, a recent Woodland patron who lives in California and works in local government, believes the situation is a clear example of what’s happened in other communities around the country.

“It’s gentrification at its worst,” says Castillo, who is among the roughly 2,700 people who have signed a petition circulated by advocacy group the Black Institute to “save black brunch.”

Even before it opened in 2012, Woodland faced opposition. In 2011, residents said such a large venue with late-night hours would attract swaths of drunken disturbances. In the years since, Community Board 6 has voted in favor of the State Liquor Authority revoking or suspending the restaurant’s liquor license, but a state judge thwarted its efforts. Some elected officials have also voiced their concerns. City Councilman Brad Lander and state Assemblywoman Jo Anne Simon, who are both white, and state Sen. Velmanette Montgomery, who is black, signed a letter recommending that Woodland’s liquor license be suspended over its allegedly causing “public intoxication, noise, unruly behavior, trespassing and vandalism.”

“Mr. Ofshtein has refused to address years of community concerns, despite repeated requests to comply with relevant laws, and help prevent drunk driving, vomiting, and urinating on his neighbors’ homes,” reads a joint statement provided to The Post from Lander and Simon. Montgomery did not respond to requests for comment.

Ofshtein says he’s worked with the community to address some of the concerns, including adding more security on weekends, lowering the music levels and using a decibel meter to make sure the noise doesn’t reach too high a level. A general manager says they also started limiting “bottomless mimosas” to two hours.

“It would raise a red flag of insensitivity . . . if anyone, the community, elected officials or the liquor authority, would reject this level of cooperation and compromise,” Ofshtein says.

Not all neighbors share the same concerns as Hagan, though.

“I’ve lived here more than 10 years and I can’t say it’s been any louder than anything that was there before,” says Sarah Collins, a consultant who lives within earshot of Woodland. “The dog next door is more annoying than Woodland.”