

Michael Hoffman writes:





On p. 100 Mr. Goldhagen writes, "The Jewish religion, as epitomized by the demonized text the Talmud and its alleged teachings..."



That's virtually all he has to say in his volume of 485 pages concerning Orthdodox Judaism's holiest book and the fount of its halacha.



Goldhagen is so sloppy he doesn't even distinguish between the Talmud Bavli and the Talmud Yerushalmi (the former is authoritiative, the latter is not). Nor does he dare to expound on the "alleged teachings" of the "Talmud" that have caused it to be "demonized."



This claim presents a logical challenge: how does one demonize a book that itself demonizes the New Testament, Jesus Christ, His Mother Mary and goyim in general?



Can one accurately say that Goldhagen has "demonized" "Mein Kampf"?



How does one go about demonizing the Talmud Bavli, a book of pronographic lies, group defamation and advocacy of theft, murder and deceit?



The Babylonian ("Bavli") Talmud is the source of much of the informed protest against Orthodox rabbinic dogma, from eminent authorities such as Dr. Alexander McCaul of King's College London. Goldhagen prefers to discuss at length the cartoonish "Protocols of Zion," whose provenance is highly questionable, rather than explain to his readers how the documented bigotry, racism and self-worship in the Talmud Bavli came to be enshrined as the basis of Pharisaic (i.e. Mishnaic) post-Temple Judaism and its derivatives: the Gemara, Mishneh Torah, Shulchan Aruch, Mishnah Berurah, etc.



On p. 29 Goldhagen makes risible comparisons between the lurid, probably faked "Protocols" and the well-researched writing of two eminent critics of Israeli colonialism, Professors Mearsheimer and Walt, terming their book on the Israeli lobby "an update on the notorious antisemitic tract The Protocols of the Elders of Zion." Outlandish, purple prose like the preceding has been a hallmark of fanatical partisans of the dispossession and extrusion of the Palestinians for decades, among whom we number Mr. Goldhagen.



"The Devil that Never Dies" is so embarrassing that even a charter member of the Zionist thought police, Anthony Julius, has termed it, "truly ludicrous." Julius documents Goldhagen's intellectual dishonesty in the Sept. 13, 2013 edition of the Wall Strret Journal, p. A13.



Goldhagen is unconscious of the fact that the devil that never dies is the self regard and egoism of human beings organized within creeds of extreme nationalist chauvinism, whether they be Nazism, Salafist Islam or Talmudic Judaism.





Makow challenges Hoffman:





"Goldhagen prefers to discuss at length the cartoonish "Protocols of Zion," whose provenance is highly questionable, " you write.

And " Goldhagen makes risible comparisons between the lurid, probably faked "Protocols"









I am surprised to see you of all people on the anti Protocols bandwagon.







Protocols of Zion are NWO Blueprint https://www.savethemales.ca/000205.html



Protocols Forgery Claim Flawed http://www. savethemales.ca/000298.html









Joly Plagiarized Protocols Not ViceVersa https://henrymakow.com/ maurice_joly_plagiarized_ proto.html





Hoffman Replies:



"I have never seen primary documentation authenticating the Protocols, so one can argue pro or contra for decades.



But you miss the point: the Protocols is where the rabbis and Zionists want the focus to remain.



They want to deflect debate and attention away from the documented and indefensible Talmud Bavli.



It's a blunder to fall into their trap."





Makow:



" Michael



It isn't either-or. They are perfectly consistent.



For me, the authenticity of the Protocols is self evident."



Hoffman:

For me, the authenticity of the Protocols is self evident."







" As a historian I can't accept that notion as evidence.



Moreover it is being used to distract from the Talmud and make the disputed Protocols the heart of the controversy as a function of the revival of 1930s-style opposition to Judaism.



We need 21st century tactics.

Makow:

" As a historian do you actually think the Masonic Jews would acknowledge the Protocols are authentic any more than they admit the true nature of the Talmud? Isn't it enough that the world is actually unfolding according to this blueprint?"



What kind of historian can't recognize the truth when it is self-evident?



It is disconcerting that their Master Plan has been public knowledge for more than 100 years and even some of their most brilliant and courageous opponents don't get it.

-------