Steam should restrict REVIEWS

Originally posted by GnarlyGamer: 4.9 hrs on record

Posted: 8 March

Can Uplay the game? No i can't.

Originally posted by Springfresh: 3.8 hrs on record

Another corporate grab at mmo/fps/cross-platform gaming. Super dissapointment. I can not, in good faith, reccomend this to any gamer expecting anything impressive. This game is sub-par.... When I say that, I mean that it should be a free to play with a few DLC skins tossed in to the mix. Game is insanely dissapointing. I don't toss my $60 purchase around lightly. Request your refund from steam while you still can.

Originally posted by WeenyDeanee: 6.5 hrs on record

Posted: 8 March

No ♥♥♥♥♥♥ joke. The verify computer at the beginning doesnt work so there are people actually standing in line behind the computer waiting their turn to verify their identity, even though not a single one can do it.

#linesimulator2k16

Originally posted by Zoopy: 20.9 hrs on record

Posted: 8 March

$60 AAA game from Ubisoft.

Servers down on the day of release.



Everything is going just as expected.

Originally posted by Agamemnon: 0.9 hrs on record

Posted: 8 March

- boring gameplay/quests..

- garbage ai..

- servers down on launch..

- uplay/udontplay..



Need I say more?

Time to process a refund!

JaRHEAD/Coup d'état AFK GAME ON: Originally posted by



And you should give reasons why. Most of the reviews based on Rage/personal opinions and personal IQ lvls.



Not valid at all.

And not allow anyone to put any review at least not before reaching 2hrs to request refund or 5hrs or 10 hrs of playing. This is pathetic really.Let's see the examples so far:And yet he managed to play 4.9 hrs, clearly he could play.I don't see anything valuable from this review to make me not wanna try the game. The dude didn't probably even finish the first missions and the side quests in it. The guy didn't see the full content of the game and yet a negative review based on we don't know what because the guy is crying over the price. Such a good negative review bouhouuuuuuuuuDay one, 6hrs after release dude posting his opinion about the entire game based on his queue experience. It's like if he went into the store at day one release of a book or a band cd and standing in line to get the book/cd, after few hours of waiting the dude is saying: Nah the book/cd sucks, im going home because I can't go forward to get my own book. kekekekekeke such a review wow.Oh guess who it is, our friend Zoopy who came here on this thread being a part of the discussion. Basically review based on price, on server status on day one release which is common nowadays in every release but overall he made 20 hrs in the game.... like he couldn't wait a day or two before adding his review, I guess he made it even before he reached 20hrs.After 1 hr in game dude says it's a boring game (I bet he even didn't finish the tutorial part), uplay this, uplay that and ofc the server storyThose are the examples of the reviews on day one release. Now how those reviews are related to the quality and content of the game? For me those kind of reviews are totally invalid.And for those who didn't buy the game but sit here on this forum trolling and insulting people over their wallet please do us a favor, go out or close the window and never come back.Thank you.