Pkd said: Which are you referring to? The infantry or the tanks? Because the infantry didn't charged in the open but took cover behind the tanks, and only went out of their cover to engage stragglers, and the tank charge is excusable when they had to rush the Tiger in order to hit its rear since their shot bounced off other parts. Click to expand... Click to shrink...

Pkd said: Source? Because I seen sources that showed WW2 vets saying that Fury was the closets thing to reality. Click to expand... Click to shrink...

I'm talking about the engagement Tiger tank, he just tells the other tanks to charge the open field like an idiot and they all die. (Because Hollywood)Never for the express purpose of shooting into enemy front armour. Something that could have saved the lives of ten other men. But hey all that holylwoodHave to perpetrate that myth of only that rear armour being vulnerable.From what I've read they like the depiction of the characters and how it's not over glorryfied the horrors of war. The senses with infantry working in conjuntion with the tanks is also quite well done actuly showing people using tactics and not just acting like zergs in a Holly wood film? What which craft is that.But as soon as the Tiger tank shows up we enter into myth fantasy land. Girls und Panzer is the better depiction of armour on armour combat than Fury.