02 July 2016

A: I am a person with intimate knowledge of the inner workings of the Clinton case. I will answer as many questions as I can without giving too much away.

------

Q: Will the Hillary get pregnant again?

A: Hopefully not.

------

Q: Why are you on 4chan on a Friday night?

A: Sent home, awaiting word about the shitstorm Lynch just caused.

------

Q: Will she be indicted?

A: There is intense pressure for us not to do so. I am posting of near anonymity and enough plausible deniability to evade prosecution, as we have all been given gag orders.

There is enough for her and the entire government to be brought down. People do not realize how enormous this whole situation actually is. Whether she will be or not depends on how much info about others involved gets out, and there are a lot of people involved.

------

Q: What reason have we to believe you?

A: None. It's better that way.

------

Q: What are they going to talk to her about tomorrow?

A: Legal is asking preliminary questions about whether or not she has been coached (she has) and setting up the general line of questioning. I am a high level analyst though, so my job is only to look at her records.

------

Q: "People do not realize how enormous this whole situation actually is"

Can you elaborate on that?

A: The real point of interest is the Clinton Foundation, not the e-mail server. We received the server from Benghazi, then from the server we found data on the Clinton Foundation. Then we realized the situation is much worse than previously thought.

------

Q: "the entire government to be brought down"

I very much doubt this.

A: She had SAP level programs on her server, which if made public, would literally cause an uprising and possibly foreign declaration of war.

------

Q: Let me guess "it's real deep guys I swear! I just can't tell you about it because it's secret!" You're a liar, friend.

A: Believe what you will.

------

Q: "I am a person with intimate knowledge of the inner workings of the Clinton case."

How long before you tragically shoot yourself in the back of the head from at least three feet away from two different angles, or suffer from an ulcer that decapitates you with a knife? Because people with dirt on the Clintons have a shocking tendency to jump off tall buildings and board faulty aircraft.

A: We are all worried about that.

------

Q: Would you support me killing her if you fail? I don't trust you, so I am preparing myself to take her out if need be.

A: Killing Hillary would not cause this problem to go away. The problem is with the Clinton Foundation as I mentioned, which you should just imagine as a massive spider web of connections and money laundering implicating hundreds of high-level people. Though I do not have a high opinion of Hillary, she is just a piece - albeit a big piece - of this massive shitstorm.

------

Q: Do you think the DOJ will protect Hillary like Holder did for Petraeus?

A: The DOJ is most likely looking to save itself. Find everyone involved in the Clinton Foundation, from its donors to its Board of Directors, and imagine they are all implicated.

------

Q: You don't agree that a message has to be sent by the people to protect the sanctity of the position? I do prefer the peaceful way, to be honest. But it's the constant fear you're going to fuck it up that grips me.

A: My opinion is the entire government is guilty of treason, which is why Hillary's death would not cease the investigation or prevent further scandals. Many, many people are involved.

------

Q: Will Comey resign if there is enough evidence to indict but is forced not to indict? Was Lynch saying that she will accept any recommendation from the FBI really means she knows they are not going to indict?

A: There already is enough to indict. Comey has been trying to stall because he does not want to face the Clinton machine, as well as the rest of Washington D.C. But this case would explode into a million other cases if fully brought to light, and then we would be one agency competing against the entire government and a hoard of other interests. It is a very tense and uncomfortable position.

What Lynch is saying is she will accept whatever they do and make her determination as she will. Nothing about her responsibilities has changed, she is simply trying to keep her hide intact.

------

Q: If you don't prosecute, what with her blatantly admitting to breaking four laws on the Rose Garden, what message will that send to the public?

A: We have no power to prosecute, we simply hand over the data to the DOJ for them to prosecute. And we do not have the authority to hand over all of the data because of its sensitivity. And some of the data will lead into other cases of corruption.

------

Q: Pretty sure the judge just said she would follow your recommendation without question today...

A: Making a recommendation is not the same as actually prosecuting. We only say, "Here is the data, you need to get XYZ" and then the DOJ acts.

------

Q: Do you ever fear for your life?

A: Yes.

------

Q: What are the chances of an indictment before the election?

A: Before the Clinton-Lynch meeting, I would have said 0%. Now it looks more likely because the public now sees the Clintons trying to cover their asses. More questions will add pressure for the investigation to continue.

------

Q: Will we really see mass resignations and leaks if nothing happens? Or is it all just bluster and hearsay?

A: Foreign powers are in possession of some of the documents we have analyzed, because they were hacked from the Clinton server. Trump has some files as well, and likely plans to leak them and use them to his advantage soon.

The leaks will have to be made in a non-transparent fashion.

------

Q: I'm aware, but if you recommend to prosecute, she said she would.

If you don't, public trust will be eroded at this point. Too much is out in the open.

A: If we recommend, we literally hand over documentation implying the entire government is involved in treason at the highest levels and everyone is about to duck and cover, as well as some sensitive details of SAPs which would obliterate national security.

------

Q: And what happens when Putin releases all the emails? And all the information he's dug up from them?

A: I am not sure, but some of my war strategy buddies are estimating a high probability that Russia will leak all the info they have out to the world, since Clinton wants to go to war with them and they have no desire to be in conflict with the US.

------

Q: "If we recommend, we literally hand over documentation implying the entire government is involved in treason at the highest levels and everyone is about to duck and cover, as well as some sensitive details of SAPs which would obliterate national security."

Most people have suspected this for a while.

What do you think will happen if you don't recommend? Not just at home, but what will other nations do with the information that is already out there?

A: If we do not recommend, it will look like a cover-up and Trump will use the perception to bolster his message. I did work in PsyOps once, and Trump's use of confirmation bias is legendary.

------

Q: Answer this:

Is Clinton a commie, yes or no?

A: No.

------

Q: How long until we know whether or not you are going to recommend?

A: Impossible to determine at this point. We could do it tomorrow if we wanted. There are too many political players involved.

------

Q: What's the deal with Bill Clinton's health?

Just old age or something else?

A: Bill Clinton will likely die this year.

------

Q: So can you give an estimate to let me know when you guys will make your decision? It's gotta happen soon, because if you don't prosecute, you are potentially, giving the keys to the white house to the most corrupt politican ever.

A: Impossible to say. The entire government is corrupt. No one is clean, not even Trump.

------

Q: In the near future, there will be several books, and a movie by Dinesh D'Souza coming out and they claim they will bring her down with this leaks. Will these have any affect on whether she's indicted?

A: They will only have an effect on public opinion, which will help her get indicted. But I assure you, Dinesh D'Souza has nothing on her. The only person coming close is Jerome Corsi. He is putting the pieces together (loosely).

------

Q: Tell me the dirt on Trump.

A: Trump has donated to the Clinton Foundation in the past, though for fairly innocuous things like building permits and such. He is smart, so his tracks are covered well. But if any prosecutor wants to go very in-depth Trump would be brought on bribery charges. He could easily get out of them, but he would be charged nonetheless.

------

Q: What do you think of this, "Sources say that the investigation will conclude shortly" meme?

A: Mainstream media is shit. Who cares what they say. They are attempting to distract by putting the focus on Hillary's emails and not the Foundation.

------

Q: So why are you hesitating? If you recommend to prosecute, you will at least have the perception of being trustworthy to the US public. If you don't, a lot of people are going to know the jig is up, and the US has lost all shred of integrity. Ditto for other countries.

Why are you guys even debating letting the cancer spread? Why are you considering allowing the corruption to spread to you?

A: Your moral inclinations may look good on the internet, but in real life the situation is complicated. You cannot possibly ask the entire government to prosecute itself. Lynch has also given to the Foundation, and has many ties to many people she should not. Remember that Bill appointed her. She is a great prosecutor, but she did not get where she is by simply being good at her job.

------

Q: How do we fix this? and be we i mean you guys lmao

A: We have our hands tied. My message to you and everyone on this board is do not get distracted by Clinton's e-mails. Focus on the Foundation. All of the nightmarish truth is there. The e-mails will pale in comparison.

------

Q: In Trump's case, isn't that just an instance of the hazing/initiation into the elite by providing them with the ability to blackmail him if he goes off reservation?

A: I do not know Trump's record, but from the case he definitely knew to limit his exposure and make it only look like a donation.

------

Q: Would a Trump presidency better for shit like this ? I assume that he would allow you to prosecute her?

A: If Trump wins, Hillary will be prosecuted. I have heard rumors Christie will be his AG, and Michael Flynn will be his VP pick.

------

Q: Give a specific example of large scale corruption or collusion.

A: Saudi Arabia visits and donations to the Clinton Foundation. Russian Uranium fiasco. Hillary and the Israel lobby, the Council on Foreign Relations. AIPAC. The list is endless.

------

Q: Why bother, then? If you can tell that your boss and your boss's boss are afraid to do their jobs, what's the point? Why not half ass it, enjoy a fat government paycheck, and cover your own ass when it inevitably falls apart?

A: My bosses have the benefit of being in the limelight. Their disappearances of silences would be accompanied by questions. Mine would not.

------

Q: Stop LARPing and give us something to work with, some good concrete examples.

A: I am providing as much as I can.

------

Q: If this isn't all some fanfiction, then this is a massive bomb that the FBI needs to carefully handle if they choose to recommend to prosecute.

A: Correct.

------

Q: How deep is Obama involved in all of this?

A: Impeachment-level involved.

------

Q: Does she kill people?

A: People have a way of dying around her.

------

Q: Trump has files, what the fuck?

A: Trump has very good people advising and leaking to him.

------

Q: We know. And by not prosecuting, you are giving these countries leverage over the US. This is the option you are discussing when you discuss not prosecuting, and you know it. In order to not cause an upheaval lasting months or years by cutting out the cancer, you are discussing letting the US die quietly.

Q2: Fuck you for not doing your duty to the people, you jaded amoral fucks. You've blown what little trust I had left that there were still decent patriots left in the government.

You fuckers are gonna let the biggest, most corrupt cunt take the highest office in the land. You think that won't bring this country down? Fuck you. Fuck you. Fuck you.

A: I will put it to you this way: You have three choices:

A) Turn over all of the information to the DOJ, make public a recommendation, the truth comes out, the entire world realizes how much the US is meddling in foreign affairs, and we go to war. The civilian population realizes how much foreign money influences our government, and a civil war begins.

B) You cherry-pick the data to implicate the people already in the eye of the public opinion, so the chips fall on the heads of a select few and the whole system does not crash.

C) You do nothing and watch the unstable political climate to gauge how you will respond.

I am confident if Trump wins she will be going to jail.

------

Q: If the FBI doesn't recommend to indict, what kind of reaction should we expect from within the FBI? Will anyone resign?

A: Comey will likely resign in any case. The FBI is being very quiet for a reason, most of us want to keep our jobs.

------

Q: Is Snowden tied up in all this somehow?

A: Snowden has nothing to do with any of this.

------

Q: Is this election a clever ploy by Obama to have a VP of his choosing become the president? Indict Hillary, and the VP takes over. And Trump might be a threat to this plan, hence all these attacks.

A: Possibly. I don't know for sure.

------

(pasted an image "fbi playbook on hillary.png")

Q: Some autist has already said as much.

(non-FBIanon response to above)

Q2: How accurate is this copypasta, OP? Spot-on analysis? Or fanfiction-tier?

A: Obama and Hillary do hate each other. Hillary hates black people and Obama dislikes recklessness. As far as the investigation, some details are correct. As to the outcome, no one knows.

------

Q: I still don't get how snuffing her doesn't end the existential investigation crisis.

A: The problem is with the entire government. Hillary is one component of that government.

------

Q: Dinesh D'souza's new movie will address the Clinton Foundation. Right?

A: Most likely.

------

Q: At bare minimum, you need to do B. If you can't at least make examples of people, the existence of the FBI is pointless.

Start with the most corrupt, like Clinton (and, I presume Feinstein), and each year, choose 3-5 new people with any level of power to indict. Do this until people start retiring.

Don't RICO the entire federal government. You have the option to do it slowly, so do it slowly.

A: But if we do it slowly, people like you will get mad that we are not working fast enough.

------

Q: Can you tell us more about the SAPs and were the classified information sent via those compromised too? Also is Obama tied to Clinton Foundation in any way?

A: All I can tell you about the SAPs is that Hillary had them, and she did not have proper authority to have any of them. They were leaked to her by someone, and she did sell them to overseas donors. Possessing them alone makes her guilty of treason.

Obama is loosely tied to the Clinton Foundation, but much more tied in with the same people who donate to the Clinton Foundation.

------

Q: "A) Turn over all of the information to the DOJ, make public a recommendation, the truth comes out, the entire world realizes how much the US is meddling in foreign affairs and we go to war. The civilian population realizes how much foreign money influences our government, and a civil war begins."

So we can expect them not only fucking around really hard in the middle east but elsewhere too? I assume Obama also has considerable influence on the EU and tries to guide them to war with Russia (or at least Hillary does).

How much is George Soros involved in all this?

A: Russian borders, Ukraine, everywhere NATO is, the South China Sea, the Philippines, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Africa.

Soros is at the heart of all of this.

------

Q: "A) Turn over all of the information to the DOJ, make public a recommendation, the truth comes out, the entire world realizes how much the US is meddling in foreign affairs and we go to war. The civilian population realizes how much foreign money influences our government, and a civil war begins."

Sounds good to me. Man the fuck up and let slip the dogs of war. If you're as deep as you claim to be then you know that this is necessary to clean out the filth in our governments. There are no other options left other than bloodshed.

Will you stand by and watch as the world falls into the grips of tyrants? Or will you fight for freedom? Those are the only questions you need to ask yourself at this point.

A: If it comes down to it, I would fight. But most of us are of the opinion that Hillary will not be president, and having Trump in office makes our job that much easier. But right now we have to carefully wade through this mud.

------

Q: Why did Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch meet on the plane?

A: As I stated before, Bill Clinton likely wanted Loretta Lynch to focus on the email server and shy away from prosecuting the foundation.

------

Q: Could the release of this information cause a civil war in the USA? Leak it. Do it. The day of the rope is nigh.

A: Yes.

------

Q: So that means she will try to assassinate Corsi. What happens if she succeeds?

A: We will go to war with Russia and possibly China if she wins.

------

Q: I'm not advocating for truth for truth's sake. Option B is the only acceptable scenario, and it needs to be done so that Trump can sweep in and clear the entire establishment of corruption. That is what you are being given the chance to do. If you fail on this, you doom us to a second Rome.

Everyone already knows and suspects option A. The patriots in the deep state need to hang this shit over Washington's head and force them to do the right thing.

A: We are working on option B.

------

Q: What can I do?

A: Post about Hillary everywhere you can. Focus on the Clinton Foundation. Do not let her email server be the sole focus of media attention. Follow the Clinton Foundation. Her emails are a small bite compared to the Clinton Foundation.

------

Q: "Mainstream media is shit. Who cares what they say. They are attempting to distract by putting the focus on Hillary's emails and not the Foundation."

To be honest, assuming it's not all a ruse, this would be a good opportunity for us to fire up our Twitters and start asking some hard questions about the Clinton Foundation publicly. The more pressure, the better. The last thing I want is for everything to go back to normal for these people.

A: You should be doing this immediately.

------

Q: Can the FBI pay me to shitpost?

A: No.

------

Q: Didn't Obama push to have the case postponed until 2018 as well?

A: There is talk of it. I do not know where the order came from.

------

Q: George Soros involved in this?

A: He is the kingpin.

------

Q: Any hard evidence Hillary sold weapons and favors from the State Department for cash to our enemies?

A: Weapons, favors, intelligence, and people.

------

Q: Why not go big?

Is Obama actually secretly Osama with his beard shaven?

A: Obama is a liberal atheist who is willingly associated with the Muslim Brotherhood. Stephen Coughlin's book, while not totally accurate, does shine light in the right direction.

------

Q: From what you're saying, there's no easy way of actually keeping the lid on this. It sounds like it's reached too many eyes and ears now, and is only going to reach more.

Whether you want it or not, I think you FBI guys need to go full hog on this. We're talking about the assured death of the republic if you don't, rather than the maybe-death of it if you do.

A: Canada has no business telling us how to run intel. Trudeau makes you all look like fools, and already his intel departments are coming to us for help doing fuck everything.

------

Q: Do you think Trump is a plant by Clinton to try and assure her a victory? Or was that theory all nonsense?

A: Trump is not a Clinton plant. He believes they are disgusting animals.

------

Q: What did the Clinton Foundation do? Please elaborate.

A: Sold influence, intel, favors, and people to anyone willing to pay.

------

Q: See, and this is the problem with Washington today. You swear to defend the Constitution, which means protecting the liberties that it guarantees the American people. But here the deep state is, contemplating allowing the outright subversion and corruption of the government because "muh existing order of things". If the corruption is as bad as you claim, then the half of these Senators and Congressmen and possibly even the President have subverted American democracy. If they are indeed traitors, then you would have an obligation go take care of it. I don't care how it's done. The American military is one of the few I'd trust to transition us until we can elect new leaders.

A: If leaking data en mass destroys my country, we betray the country. If we do nothing, we betray the country. I am not disagreeing with you. I am saying the situation is more complicated when you are inside, and you do not have the breadth of info that I have that would make your eyes fall out of your skull if you know what all was going on.

------

Q: Is it time to buy a gun?

A: Yes.

------

Q: What does SAP stand for?

A: Special Access Programs.

------

Q: So, given that there is a claimed risk of external and internal war if the intent of the government treason is revealed, was getting caught part of their plan?

A: They are not big guys.

------

Q: With Bernie- around the time Clinton clinched the delegates, he had a meeting with Obama and came out smiling. Anything suspicious about that given what you are privy to?

A: Bernie is staying in hoping Clinton will be indicted or forced to recuse herself from the race. We cannot know what will happen atm.

------

Q: Do we have any real reason to believe this person guys? I've been lurking and I just want to believe so bad. But it would be so easy for this to be top tier trolling...right?

A: If you dig hard into the Clinton Foundation and make it the sole point of your focus, you will remember this thread when the truth is revealed.

------

Q: Why would she drag us to war? In what way does that benefit her? Also, can you post any proof that you’re legit?

A: It benefits her because her donors have paid for it. I do not want to post any information about me or where I am, because if any hint got out that I posted anything, I would be fired and blacklisted. Possibly killed.

------

Q: What are the chances of you guys not doing option B and just doing option A? Maybe have a redo and flip a coin or something.

A: Option A is not going to happen. Maybe if Trump gets elected.

------

Q: What do you know about admiralty law being imposed on the people and the usurpation of common law?

A: Not likely to happen. If you remember the post by the red team planner, his analysis was spot-on.

------

Q: "He is the kingpin."

Then start with the Kingpins. The Clintons and Soros would be enough to let everyone else know that you aren't fucking around.

A: I admire your spirit.

------

Q: "Thomas Sowell"

The faggot that compared Trump to Hitler? I used to respect him before that.

A: Sowell has documented that blacks were actually integrating decently into American society before the welfare state began.

------

Q: What's your guys opinion on meme magic? Kekkism?

How does Obama feel about the recent Chicago scanner threads (thanks for ruining that btw, fun-haters) and the light they shine on his "fair city"?

A: I am not religious, so I have no opinion on kek. But meme magic is very real, in the sense that a thought large enough to gain traction with enough minds will manifest in external reality. That's why confirmation bias works, and why Trump has used it to his advantage.

------

Q: What the fuck is a Special Access Program? A computer program? Or is it like a full nuclear kit thing like in movies? Can you tell us what they do?

A: A Special Access Program is an intelligence program classified above top-secret. They are held on closed servers at secret locations. The only way to get one is if you are specifically read on to a program, have a need to know, then you must physically go to a location and pass through several layers of security to even look at the program. A good example in non-classified terms would be the locations and operations of our intelligence operatives around the glove, or our missile silo locations.

------

Q: Any info on Sid Blumenthal? What is he doing now?

A: Blumenthal is attempting to get dirt on and strategize against Trump.

------

Q: Is Soros an ideologue or a profiteer? He seems a bit old to be the latter.

What countries are least tainted by corruption in your opinion? Or is it the standard huffpo top 10 lists like Iceland, New Zealand, etc.?

A: Ideologue. Believes he and his cohorts are the answer to ending all world wars. Todd Huizinga's book The New Totalitarian Temptation reveals the mindset quite adequately.

------

Q: Where does Soros stand in all of this?

A: Soros funds, instructs, and influences every layer of US government. Right down to the tax code.

------

Q: Should I be using Linux or Windows if I am to be making a Twitter account and start digging into the Clinton Foundation?

Also, what is with the North American Union that has been proposed by Obama?

A: It does not matter; any agency can find any computer working right now. What you have to do is get lost in the noise. Do not do anything out of your ordinary behavior and you will be fine.

------

Q: How do I adequately dig in the Clinton Foundation and help prevent it from being forgotten? I'm about to start googling after I post this comment but I feel like that's naive.

A: Promote and discuss it everywhere. Ask questions. Read the news on it. Post articles everywhere. Pirate Jerome Corsi's book (so people can't say I am shilling) because he does have some things right.

------

Q: Is the FBI in this case then entirely pro-Trump, I assume? Does she have every single media outlet in America in her hands? How strong is Angela Merkel involved in all of this? (Or Germany in general.)

A: Most of us are pro-Trump. Hillary hates that Trump makes the media profitable, so they have to keep covering him. Germany is not involved. Merkel likes Hillary though.

------

Q: If you guys were able to get Nixon, why not Clinton?

A: Nixon wasn't nearly as reckless.

------

Q: How much does Loretta Lynch know about this? Does she realize that this is much bigger than Hillary, or is she somehow ignorant about the scope of this?

A: Lynch has an idea, but if she gets any more info she will have to either recuse herself or prosecute. Remember, if too much information is given it violates national security law and people have to back away.

------

Q: If Bill Clinton dies, will that get Hillary elected?

How usual is it to have your own email server in your home?

A: If Bill Clinton dies it may help her, but I doubt it. The server makes her look corrupt as fuck.

------

Q: Nah I get you, I'm just signalling the fuck out of this to get people reading to consider alternatives. And what do you mean by "destroy the country"? If you destroy the federal government, state governments will step in to fill the void temporarily until new elections or a Constitutional Convention can be held to lawfully change the form of the federal government.

Yeah, shit will go south for a while. But it won't be the absolute end of the world.

A: Revolutions are much longer and more violent than you think. And if a civil war breaks out, foreign powers will immediately get involved, prolonging any conflict.

------

Q: In the SAP wiki, the Secretary of State is given access to SAP. So in what way did she break the law?

A: Secretary of State CAN have access. That does not mean he/she WILL. SAP is granted on a need to know basis, and Hillary did not have any need to know any of the programs on her server.

------

Q: I'm just a lowly little person who wants to live a simple, happy, and peaceful life in a country I love. Any chance of this happening?

A: It is more fun in the game.

------

Q: Are you gonna do another thread dude? Or have you answered pretty much everything you are willing to?

A: I am getting tired but I want to drive home my point about the Clinton Foundation. I may start another thread.

------

Q: ...So meme magic is just fucking confirmation bias. Well that really takes the wind out of Kek.

A: Perceptions shape reality.

------

Q: "If you dig hard into the Clinton Foundation and make it the sole point of your focus, you will remember this thread when the truth is revealed."

Any leads on that? Or just Google?

"Not likely to happen. If you remember the post by the red team planner, his analysis was spot-on."

It happened in 1933, same time the gold was confiscated. It's why today you see cases like The People of Vermont v. $10,000.

www.apfn.org/apfn/flag.htm

Worth a read.

A: Keep pressing for more info on the Clinton Foundation.

------

A: I am a person with intimate knowledge of the inner workings of the Clinton case. I will answer as many questions as I can without giving too much away.

Original thread: >>79480356

------

Q: So is the government really trying to pass stricter gun laws as a way to control us if shit gets out of hand?

A: 100% true.

------

Q: "A Special Access Program is an intelligence program classified above top-secret. They are held on closed servers at secret locations. The only way to get one is if you are specifically read on to a program, have a need to know, then you must physically go to a location and pass through several layers of security to even look at the program. A good example in non-classified terms would be the locations and operations of our intelligence operatives around the glove, or our missile silo locations."

So how did she get the SAPs out to sell them? I can just imagine that smug cunt waddling out with a USB smiling at every person she sees.

A: Someone leaked them to her.

------

Q: I'm pretty ignorant when talking about American politics, but this thread is mesmerizing. FBIanon, how could all of this affect the South American governments? Do they have some dirt in this too?

A: AFAIK, South American governments are not implicated, but we do have operations in Venezuela which would get out of hand quick if leaked.

------

Q: How will this affect the UK? Is Brexit going to be a factor in all of this unravelling?

A: It is very likely Britain will remain in the EU.

------

Q: Can you at least post a badge or something? Info makes sense but I am having a hard time believing it, my dubs man.

A: At my level, doing so would trigger so many alarms I could not guarantee my future. This way there is plausible deniability. Lost in the crowd.

------

Q: How much is the EU/NATO being pushed towards war with Russia?

A: Heavily.

------

Q: What is the likelihood that Hillary will get indicted? What would be the indicators that the indictment is imminent?

A: Indicited: depends on if Trump gets elected. Imminent: 0%.

------

Q: Do Russia (or others) have enough info to bring down Clinton if they leaked it? Would they be more likely to leak it or use it for blackmail?

A: They have enough to take her down. I am not sure of the totality of what they have. I can tell you that they 100% hacked her server.

------

Q: Is Trump's wall financially feasible?

A: Yes.

------

Q: How big of a risk are you taking posting this to 4chan?

A: Enormous, but the risks are mitigated by anonymity and plausible deniability.

------

Q: What nations are untouched by this mass conspiracy? Is Alex Jones a disinfo agent?

A: No one is untouched, the US has operations going on around the world in every hole you can think of. Alex Jones is a useful idiot. He does believe what he says, though.

------

Q: In all seriousness why HASN'T Putin leaked anything yet?

A: Putin is waiting to see how the DOJ plays it, also how the elections work out. I think if Hillary gets elected and tries to start shit, he will use it as a deterrent against war.

------

Q: The picture you've painted about the extent of government corruption is incredibly bleak. Have you lost faith in democracy? Also, I'm a recent college grad who hasn't gotten a job yet. Should I even bother trying to be a functional member of such a corrupt society? Why not just lock myself in my room and become a NEET?

A: We do not live in a democracy, we live in a republic. The is a lot of greatness in America, and there is still plenty to love. Society and culture are dependent on man. You are in control of society, not the other way around.

-----

Q: Okay, Mr. RP. Will you push far enough to keep Hillary Clinton out of office?

A: I do what I can.

------

Q: Are the incidents manufactured with the intent of harsher gun control laws?

A: Yes. The gay bar attacks were inside jobs.

------

Q: What is your view of the Libertarian Party during this cycle? Viable threat to the duopoly or just delusions of grandeur?

A: Good way to shut down the Democratic party. In general Libertarians are just loony.

------

Q: How likely is it that she will be brought up for indictment?

A: Likely if Trump gets elected.

------

Q: Are the people leading the investigation blackmailed pedophiles?

A: No. The people under the magnifying glass do have an affinity for children.

------

Q: Give us something significant that will happen in the next few days so that we know you are telling the truth.

A: I cannot predict the future. I am a high-level analyst and strategist, nothing more.

------

Q: How crooked is Loretta Lynch the affirmative action sheboon? Will she save Hillary's fat butt?

A: She is covering her own ass.

------

Q: This may be a silly question if you're legit, but who do you support for the election in November? Do you think Donald Trump is a good candidate?

A: I support Trump. He is a good candidate. Not perfect, but good. I used to work in PsyOps, and Trump's campaign is exactly how the textbooks train. It will be studied by agents forever.

------

Q: Will people be so insanely butt hurt from the files if they are released that people will arm themselves?

A: If the files are released.

------

A: Responses are going too fast and I am getting tired so if answers are too short, you know why.

------

Q: Did Hillary or her allies set up the Orlando shooting? Omar Mateen was with her after all.

A: Shooting was CIA.

------

Q: Why does she misspell Obama's name in all her emails?

A: Hillary is honestly a reckless idiot.

------

Q: Since you should have your ear to the ground, is the right really rising? I know people everywhere are getting sick of the bullshit.

A: Nationalism is a cultural trend globally.

------

Q: What are all the charges as of now that she could possibly be indicted for?

A: Treason of every kind, multiple violations of the Constitution and the Espionage Act.

------

Q: I've been reading the questions and answers here and am so far impressed. I know some people with high level security clearance that have said similar things to what you're saying. However a few things are slightly different. I've also looked into this and am quite appalled by some of the documents I've seen. That aside, I have a couple of questions.

In regards to the Clinton Foundation, what would happen if all of this information ended up being released to the general public? As in, what would happen if all the Clinton Foundation secret records were released publically?

A: I said that in the last thread, total chaos. The government would be exposed at every layer, who pays who, who buys what, and no one has yet asked about all the human trafficking bits I have been laying out.

------

Q: What if you, you personally, leaked all the documents to the darkweb or some other online outlet. What would happen?

A: Silencing and/or death. Some places are trying to leak but we censor them too fast.

------

Q: Would the countries that would be named in the documentation declare war if there was a large change in government?

A: No, they would declare war because all our secret operations in their countries would be exposed.

------

Q: Couldn't you have the AGs of some of the right aligned states indict her if they were given enough information and documentation?

A: We have thought about this. It is on the table.

------

Q: I assume most people in the FBI are Republicans, yes? I mean, I can't imagine too man leftists joining the FBI. It seems very much out of the hippy dippy leftwing horseshit they like.

So...if that's the case, why don't you fuckers just leak the goods and take Clinton down through the backdoor?

A: Yes. We do our jobs, not what we want.

------

Q: What do you know about 9/11? Was it an inside job?

A: 9/11 was Mossad.

------

Q: Give me a sentence or two about what you know about data compression/where it's going.

A: Data compression can mean many things, be more specific.

------

Q: How can we keep a war or more importantly a world government from happening? This sounds like some dystopian movie.

A: Buy more guns and get smarter about civil war.

------

Q: I've got a question for ya, OP. How bad could this actually get? You've mentioned fear of war and revolution. Is there any possibility that Russia or China could fuck us in the fallout?

A: If a civil war broke out, 100% certainty that China and Russia would get involved.

------

Q: Also, what fears would need to be resolved in order for the FBI to be willing to go nuclear on this bitch and the Clinton Foundation?

A: This would be like launching a nuke at NYC. We would hit the target, but we would then be at war with the whole US. The FBI is facing the entire federal government in this case. It is why we are so quiet.

------

Q: What did Ambassador Stevens know or was going to tell that got him Killaried?

A: Weapons smuggling to Libyan "rebels".

------

Q: "It is very likely Britain will remain in the EU"

The fuck are you talking about? They're obviously going to keep it out as a warning to other fence sitters: if you leave, you're gone for good.

A: Deals are being made to be in the EU without being "in" the EU. Backpedalling is running rampant right now, the new conservatives are just as pro-EU as the left. It is why they barred Farage from negotiating with the EU.

------

Q: When did this widespread corruption start? My history teacher said the Romans didn't know they lost their republic until 100 years after it was gone. How long has it been for us?

A: Average age of any empire is 250 years. They all end the same way.

------

Q: Is there any evidence of the Clinton machine having 20-40 people murdered? I can't find the picture.

A: Plenty. Dig deep.

------

Q: Why on earth would they want a war with Russia? It still has nuclear weapons to blow the US up ten times. Are they banking on Putin being too scared to use them?

A: Russia is a threat. Highly nationalistic and too white. Loxism is a real thing. Putin is a terrifying figure.

------

Q: OP, in your opinion and the sentiment within the FBI and government:

How many more years do we have left until the political divide reaches a tipping point and bullets start flying? The mass shootings are indicative of societal decay and pessimism within American sentiment.

A: Soon. Jesse Williams' statements are fed to him, and he will likely be a major figure in sewing division.

------

Q: You mentioned in the thread before that Hillary is reckless. Could you elaborate on that?

A: She doe not care for the details. She simply likes to have everyone do everything for her, while she does nothing but get money.

------

Q: OP, please don't ignore me. I know Singapore is a hotspot for espionage and an intelligence hub concerning China, regional Jihadist elements and others. My question is, what is our role in US plan and will we cooperate with you against our neighbors and China or do we maintain neutrality?

A: Apologies, I cannot keep up with the thread and I am very tired. Singapore is not implicated to my knowledge. My strategy buddies believe Singapore will be loyal to US.

------

Q: Since you're dating Soros is the kingpin: He's saying the EU will now inevitably fall. How likely is that, since he has so much invested in its success?

A: Soros is senile. Nothing he says is of value.

------

Q: You said the US/NATO are pushing heavily for a war against Russia. What the fuck do they hope to accomplish by that?

A: Soros.

------

Q: Do you think it's better for Trump if she doesn't get indicted, because she arguably has more flaws than an alternative Democrat like Bernie?

(p.s. I fucking hate both of them, just for the record.)

A: Yes. Trump will (hopefully) obliterate her. She is more thin-skinned than he is.

------

Q: Wait, was Libya a smokescreen to get the SAP that Clinton sold to the hands of the buyer?

A: Libya was an arms operation in conjunction with the CIA/DOD to give arms to the "rebels". We didn't deploy troops because we would have gone to war.

------

Q: Is there hope that I'll be able to live a nice long happy life and start a family here in the Commonwealth of Virginia?

A: Yes.

------

Q: "Indicted: depends on if Trump gets elected. Imminent: 0%."

What do you mean by this? That the FBI intends to bury the investigation prior to the election?

A: Looks that way so far. It is a tough situation.

------

Q: If what you're posting is true and our government is really Illuminati Lite, won't they be monitoring what you post here and rub you out later?

A: Plausible deniability.

------

Q: So are you saying that your affiliated agency does not see any conflict with China and its neighbors especially with Taiwan, South Korea, Japan, and several ASEAN nations? I'm quite flabbergasted that your priority isn't containing Chinese intelligence infiltration or hacking.

A: My main area of expertise is war games on the Russian front, when I did more strategy than high intel. My buddies know more about the China situation. I just know the South China Sea situation is rough.

------

Q: Joining the military at this time; good or bad?

A: Depends on who is elected next.

------

Q: You've said two things so far: human trafficking and looking into the Clinton Foundation... Is that a hint to the starting point of our own research?

A: Everything I have said is a hint.

------

Q: "Data compression can mean many things, be more specific."

Data is increasing exponentially. What exactly are your methods for collecting, compressing it, and analyzing it? What companies are at the forefront of this? I know the answer, by the way.

A: *asking me to detail data collection methods*

Oracle, LexusNexus, and most recently Micron are all getting into big data work with us.

------

Q: What do you know about Farage? Is he sincere? Is he as good as /pol/ thinks?

A: Farage is a genuine person.

------

Q: Is there any proof in the Clinton Foundation leaks about Israel wanting to great Greater Israel?

A: Yes.

------

Q: Is there any proof in the Clinton Foundation leaks about white genocide?

A: Yes.

------

Q: Is there any proof in the Clinton Foundation leaks about the Holocaust being a lie?

A: No.

------

Q: Is there any proof in the Clinton Foundation leaks about "Michelle" Obama being a man?

A: Michelle is a woman.

------

Q: Do members of Congress own strip clubs and when they visit, have their own sex slaves?

A: Jeffrey Epstein.

------

Q: Would it be a good idea for me to work at the CIA, even if I'm posting here?

A: Even better on a resume.

------

Q: What would Russia or the chinks hope to do in the USA? Instill communism? Russian puppet? They would have a real fun time cleaning up the mess of the civil war along with the massive insurgency.

A: They want to avoid conflict. But in a civil war, they want to make sure the strongest power is friendly with them.

------

Q: Has /pol/ (any of them) found out about anything that the FBI had thought was kept secret and wouldn't be found out, then /pol/ happened?

A: No.

------

Q: Has /pol/ ever found out anything that the FBI didn't know before the FBI did?

A: Yes.

------

Q: Why was JFK assassinated?

A: Messing with the banking elite.

------

Q: "I said in the last thread, total chaos. The government would be exposed at every layer, who pays who, who buys what, and no one has yet asked about the human trafficking bits I have been laying out."

Okay. Do tell. What about the human trafficking? I assume that those who can be indicted are involved.

A: Pedophiles are sex traffickers everywhere. Many politicians trade girls like cattle.

------

Q: Are the US elections rigged? Will Hillary try to rig this one?

A: Yes. It is amazing Trump won primaries.

------

Q: Refugee crisis: orchestrated or not? Is it better to opt out of a V4 state or South America or will it be possible to live safe in a western European country for the next decades? Is Merkel retarded or involved?

A: Orchestrated. Elites need serf populations to work for cheap.

------

Q: Oh I wanted to ask you if Bill Clinton is a pedophile that blows babies. You know anything about that?

A: Bill Clinton is a confirmed pedophile.

------

Q: What can Canadians do to help? I'm in no position to join the RCMP or CSIS, in relation to your "Join the FBI" advice.

A: Get rid of Trudeau. He has no experience managing or running a country. Fucking leafs.

------

Q: Is there anything else one can do for the future besides vote Trump and try to uphold virtue, our nation's principles, and culture? Will Europe become a meat grinder in a war against Islam?

A: This is really iffy territory for me. Strategy works by having multiple games running at the same time, assessing the realistic probabilities of each scenario, and acting accordingly. If one plan fails, another acts. In my previous jobs I worked with Russian war games, but I did not do much with the Eurozone. But my buddy told me once that Europe will experience a cultural backlash, which, unless they manage to violently oust Islam which will require a great force, local whites will flee to the US.

------

Q: Please, before you sleep, speak a little on the child prostitution ring.

A: Sex rings are popular in all governments, but pedophilia is primary in British parliament and Saudia Arabia, and that's why Hillary and Bill love foreign donors so much. They get paid in children as well as money. Dig deep and you can find it. It will sicken you.

------

Q: What's the deal with messing Mexico's shit up? Is it voter manipulation, or is it another reason?

A: Mexico is actively trying to undermine the US.

------

Q: Do you have access to when a new media false flag occurs and if yes, could you give us a hint? (Country, month, purpose)

A: Watch the conventions carefully.

------

Q: Will the US and Israel eventually turn on the Saudis and nuke them into oblivion?

A: More like the Israelis + Saudis = US gets nuked.

------

Q: Do you know what Russia's ambitions are towards eastern Europe? As in, what they might try to pull next? Do you know of any effort to create a Euro Maidan kind of situation/revolution in Poland like they did in Ukraine?

A: Russia wants Ukraine back, and then they want to be left the fuck alone to invest. Russia is more a paragon of freedom and nationalism than any other country.

------

Q: Who has more CP, the FBI or CIA? Is CP a big deal in the highest level of officials in world governments?

A: CIA is huge.

------

A: It is 4:20 here guys, and I am tired as fuck. I enjoyed giving you all what I could.

If there is anything to gain from this, it is FOCUS ON THE CLINTON FOUNDATION.

The media will over the next few weeks try to paint the email scandal as the only scandal, and Hillary may or may not get indicted. But if you keep pressing the Clinton Foundation and do not let the questions or demands die, then the truth will come out.

Follow the Foundation.