Think tanks such as the Cato Institute and the Tax Foundation like to cherry-pick tax data to claim that the rich pay more than their fair share. But a broad look at taxation shows it’s not true, a writer at The Economist says.

An earlier article in that magazine had noted that in recent years, the top 5 percent of earners received 32 percent of the nation’s adjusted gross income but paid 59 percent of federal individual income taxes. “If that’s not giving something back, what is?” the author had asked.

Yes, most of the American income tax code is progressive, meaning that earners with higher incomes are taxed at higher rates. But income tax is only part of the tax picture, and a small part at that, an article in rebuttal to the earlier one explains. In the whole of the U.S., income taxes account for only 27 percent of total government revenue. That leaves three-quarters of the tax pie for which the argument made by the rich man’s defender does not hold true. That slice consists of the Social Security payroll tax (from which the wealthy are mostly exempt), along with sales and excise taxes. It’s through these taxes that the middle class pays more.

“[T]he American tax code as a whole is almost perfectly flat,” the rebuttal continues. The bottom 20 percent of earners make 3 percent of the income and pay 2 percent of taxes. The middle 20 percent earns 11 percent of the income and pays 10 percent in taxes. And the top 1 percent makes 21 percent of all earnings and parts with 22 percent in taxes.

But that’s not how it has to be. We could live in a world where the rich really do pay as much in taxes as the author of the original article probably led many readers to believe.

— Posted by Alexander Reed Kelly.