4 SHARES Share Tweet

[adsense_id=”3″]







How do “unenlightened” people know that they want to be “enlightened?” And how will they know when they have finally reached that point – that point that they cannot yet conceive or explain, yet have faith they will know it when it finally arises? But the concept of “enlightenment” becomes – in itself – an obstacle to overcome on the quest to what can be called enlightenment, but in itself has no inherit value or meaning.

For those that do believe in enlightenment, and who may also be on the path to find it, these fundamental questions may arise: What does “enlightenment” mean to me?

This is how enlightenment becomes a trap. We fantasize – distract ourselves from the true fruits of life in search of a phantasm. And one day, if we keep on our spiritual path, we will eventually have to let go of even these ideas about “enlightenment,” if we want to experience the truth, to see it through one’s own mind.

For these reasons, one may find that there is nothing useful in his or her personal interpretation of “enlightenment” – no knowledge to be found that would guide one to where he or she wants to be. If a spiritual concept is only causing further roadblocks, reject it and come back to it later (or perhaps not at all) – don’t complicate it any further by intellectualizing it – this only wastes energy.

Enlightenment does not refer to a place where one wants to be – it is a place where one already is. It is nowhere to be found. It is nowhere to be discovered. It is only here to be realized. Enlightenment is not the end of the spiritual journey, nor is it the beginning. It can be better characterized as a moment that is outside of human conception (cannot be measured in the physical world, nor described in words) – but it is real – because it can be sensed. The “feeling” only is what it is. And how that “feeling” causes us to behave, from that point forward, is how it is. And that is all there is to it, there is no enlightenment (quote unquote).

Most experience falls short of conception, and therefore it cannot be completely shared with others through language. As the Polish-American scientist and philosopher Alfred Korzybski once said, “the map is not the territory” – in reference to the fact that all conceptions of the mind are abstractions and never encapsulate the thing that is wished to be described as it actually is (yes, in the complete and utter empty Tao-sense of the word “is”).