Like Friedrich Nietzsche, George Orwell is often and unfairly thought to have no sense of humour. But there’s a lot of humour amid the horror of Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949). Take the scene in which a group of workers at the Ministry of Truth conduct a “Two Minutes Hate” against thought-crime and then worship Big Brother with “a deep, slow, rhythmical chant of ‘B-B!… B-B!’ — over and over again, very slowly, with a long pause between the first ‘B’ and the second.”

The Ministry of Mendacity

Does the juxtaposition of “B-B” with “Ministry of Truth” remind you of anything? It should, because Orwell was satirizing the B.B.C., where he worked on propaganda for part of the Second World War. In Orwell’s novel, the Ministry of Truth was dedicated to lying and to the suppression of inconvenient reality. That’s why it was full of memory holes, “large oblong slits protected by wire grating” that “existed in thousands or tens of thousands throughout the building, not only in every room but at short intervals in every corridor.” Memory holes exist to destroy memory, not preserve it, as the novel’s hero, Winston Smith, sees in a torture-chamber at the Ministry of Love. His torturer O’Brien shows him a photograph proving the evil and corruption of the governing ideology:

“It exists!” he cried.

“No,” said O’Brien.

He stepped across the room. There was a memory hole in the opposite wall. O’Brien lifted the grating. Unseen, the frail slip of paper was whirling away on the current of warm air; it was vanishing in a flash of flame. O’Brien turned away from the wall.

“Ashes,” he said. “Not even identifiable ashes. Dust. It does not exist. It never existed.”

“But it did exist! It does exist! It exists in memory. I remember it. You remember it.”

“I do not remember it,” said O’Brien. (Op. cit., Part 3, ch. 2)

That’s how the BBC really behaves in the twenty-first century. When reporting restrictions were lifted at the end of Britain’s latest vibrant rape-gang trial, the BBC held the story up briefly before the eyes of the British public, just as O’Brien held a truthful photograph up before the eyes of Winston Smith. Then the BBC imitated O’Brien and dropped the story down the memory hole: in a day, it had vanished from news-bulletins. As far as the BBC is now concerned: “It does not exist. It never existed.”

But the Huddersfield Horrorshow does exist. Like Rotherham, Huddersfield is a Yorkshire town that most British people couldn’t find on the map and that most foreigners will never have heard of. Like Rotherham again, White girls have been systematically raped and prostituted there by Muslim men, year after year:

Twenty members of a “vile and wicked” grooming gang have been convicted of trafficking, drugging and raping vulnerable girls in a harrowing campaign of abuse across West Yorkshire. It can now be reported that the ringleader of the group, 35-year-old Amere Singh Dhaliwal, was jailed for life to serve a minimum of 18 years after being found guilty of 54 offences, including countless rapes of children. Judge Geoffrey Marson QC said the crimes against 15 girls far exceeded anything he had previously seen. The gang’s “persistent and prolonged” offending, he said, was “at the top of the scale” of severity. … Jurors in the three trials heard how the men, mostly from Huddersfield, plied girls as young as 11 with alcohol and drugs before sexually abusing them in car parks, hotels, takeaways, snooker halls, on moors and by reservoirs across the region. Fifteen severely vulnerable girls fell victim to the gang between 2004 and 2011. One girl, aged 11 or 12 at the time, was abducted from a care home and supplied ecstasy before being made to perform sex acts, Leeds crown court heard. Many of the victims described how they were plied with drink and drugs at house parties then raped “one by one” by the men, who used plastic bags as condoms. Dhaliwal was at the heart of the group, who referred to each other using nicknames including “Dracula,” “Beastie” and “Chiller” in monikers that were used in the three trials. The court heard the married father-of-two committed countless rapes, incited child prostitution, trafficked girls across the region and filmed their abuse on his mobile phone. His treatment of the girls was “inhuman,” the judge said, including one occasion when he sexually abused a girl with a drinks bottle during a truth or dare game. At another time, an intoxicated 15-year-old girl was raped by a man in a “dare” by Dhaliwal, while others watched. It was “degrading and wicked,” the judge said. The girls were deliberately targeted for their vulnerabilities. All had troubled home lives, including one whose mother was unable to care for her due to drink and drug addictions. Two of the girls had mild learning disabilities. At least one girl attempted suicide and another had an abortion, jurors heard. One of the girls was thrown out of a moving car outside her home. She had bruises all over her face and was under the influence of alcohol and drugs. … (Huddersfield grooming gang jailed for abusing vulnerable girls, The Guardian, 19th October 2018)

But remember that Huddersfield and Rotherham are relatively small places. Much, much more of this abuse has happened in Yorkshire cities like Bradford, Leeds and Sheffield, as will emerge sooner or later.

“Many other perpetrators have not been identified”

And the full truth has not emerged in Huddersfield. Twenty men of “Pakistani heritage” were found guilty, but the story confirms what I said in “Rape-Gangs Unlimited.” Those twenty Pakistanis were merely “specimen defendants, selected when a ‘community’ contains too many criminals for the authorities to charge without embarrassment.” There are many more child-rapists walking free in Yorkshire, if the victims themselves are to be believed: “The court heard many other perpetrators have not been identified and girls spoke of being abused by men they heard being called ‘Mangos’ — a term used for men from Pakistan who did not really speak English.”

Should the girls be believed? Well, who is most insistent that victims of sexual violence must always be believed? Feminists, of course. But just as in Rotherham, Oxford, Newcastle, Cologne and every other outbreak of brutal non-White misogyny, feminists have been conspicuous by their absence in the Huddersfield Horrorshow. And just as in Rotherham, Huddersfield has a Labour council and a Labour MP who have failed to defend the interests of White working-class girls. But the parallels are even closer, because Barry Sheerman, the Labour MP in Sheffield, is a staunch philosemite and Friend of Israel like Denis MacShane in Rotherham. Sheerman has regularly appeared in the British media to denounce anti-Semitism and condemn Jeremy Corbyn for his failure to obey Jewish orders (see here, here, here and here).

Sheer chutzpah

To give Sheerman his due, he did make some effort to help the abused girls in his constituency “back in 2008” when he was “approached by at least half-a-dozen of them” and “tried to raise his concerns in a parliamentary debate.” Alas, he now says that “the climate at the time was not conducive and the ‘negative reaction’ left him struggling to take the matter forward.” In other words, he tried a little and then gave up. He had more important matters to attend to, like working for Britain’s tiny Jewish community.

His priorities are puzzling, because like nearby Rotherham and Barnsley, Huddersfield is “not a Jewish place.” But it is a Labour place and the Labour party has once again proved that it has an Orwellian title: “The Ministry of Peace concerns itself with war, the Ministry of Truth with lies, the Ministry of Love with torture and the Ministry of Plenty with starvation.” In 21st-century Britain, the Labour party concerns itself with attacking the interests of the White working-class, not with championing them as it was founded to do.

Lammy lambasts Javid

Nevertheless, Labour politicians did erupt in fury over one aspect of the Huddersfield Horrorshow: a tweet about it sent by the Home Secretary Sajid Javid. The Black Labour MPs Diane Abbott and David Lammy “lambasted” Javid after he tweeted that: “These sick Asian paedophiles are finally facing justice.” Lammy and Abbott were furious that Javid had dared to point out the gang were all drawn from one small ethnic minority. Lammy said: “It does no service to the victims of this evil to pin the blame on any one group.” Abbott took a deep breath and said: “Attempts by authorities and now it seems the government to attribute these crimes to one ethnic group does nothing to support these vulnerable women in the way of social services, mental health services, or the resources needed by the police to bring all sexual predators to justice.”

These comments are wholly dishonest, because no-one is suggesting that such crimes are unique to any group. But such crimes are certainly much more prevalent among non-Whites than Whites, which is precisely why Lammy and Abbott do not want attention drawn to the “ethnicity” of the Huddersfield rape-gang. Their comments are also richly ironic, because Lammy and Abbott have never done anything to support the many thousands of White women and girls raped and otherwise abused by Muslims and other non-Whites. On the contrary, they’ve done their best to expand and worsen the plague of non-White crime by supporting mass immigration and demonizing Whites for “racism” and “xenophobia.”

As the Holocaust Educational Trust says…

But Sajid Javid himself was prepared to speak only part of the truth, because the phrase “Asian paedophiles” should have been “Pakistani paedophiles.” And Javid fully supports the vast anti-White apparatus of “anti-racism” and “diversity.” How could he not? He’s a shabbos goy who regularly appears at Jewish venues to heap sycophantic praise on the group that has funded his political rise and given him friendly media coverage:

Sajid Javid’s speech at the Union of Jewish Students’ Annual Conference 2014 Shalom Aleichem [Hebrew for “Peace be with you”]. Thank you for coming, and thank you for inviting me along today. It’s always great to see young people getting engaged with the political process. … A century ago William Howard Taft called anti-Semitism a “Noxious weed”. A century later, I don’t want to see that weed taking root in any aspect of British life. That’s why I will always be proud to stand up and resist calls for boycotts of Israel. I know that such calls are nothing more than a smokescreen for the oldest hatred. That’s why I am proud to see the government taking real action against anti-Semites who want to gain a foothold in Britain’s universities. We’re denying a platform to extremists who would abuse our freedoms in order to sow the seeds of division. And that’s why I’m proud of the work we’re doing with the Holocaust Educational Trust. We’re paying for two teenagers from every British school to visit Auschwitz, letting them see for themselves the horrors of the Shoah. I had the privilege of joining a group of children from my constituency when they visited two years ago. I’ve read a great deal about the atrocities of the Nazi regime. And I was extremely moved by the permanent Holocaust exhibition at the Imperial War Museum. But nothing can prepare you for the experience of actually being there. The Prime Minister [then David Cameron] found that for himself when he visited this week. I’m sure everyone who goes to Auschwitz is touched by what they see in different ways. For me, I will never forget the sight of a case filled with thousands upon thousands of shoes taken from those who were murdered. Mixed in among them there were countless tiny pairs that had clearly been stolen from the feet of children. As a parent — and as a human being — it’s a sight that will live with me forever. As the Holocaust Educational Trust says, when we understand where prejudice leads, we can stop it in its tracks. … [Etc, etc] (Sajid Javid’s speech at the Union of Jewish Students’ Annual Conference, 14th December 2014)

But what is the central lesson of the Holocaust? If we look at Israel, the central lesson is obviously that Jews must retain control of their own destiny by refusing to allow mass immigration. Jews are determined that no hostile outsiders will ever be dominant over Jews in Israel. But if we look at Western nations, the central lesson of the Holocaust is that Whites must lose control of their own destiny by permitting endless mass immigration by hostile outsiders from the Third World. If Whites resist this invasion, they are being “racist,” “prejudiced,” “hateful,” and “xenophobic.” At least, that’s what Jews and shabbos goyim like Sajid Javid all say.

Civil war is on its way

They’re lying. The Huddersfield Horrorshow, like all the rape-gang scandals that went before and all those that will follow, is an example of what non-White Muslims are doing to Whites while they are still a relatively small minority in Britain. As their numbers grow, their behaviour will get worse — much worse. That’s why they and all other non-Whites have to return where they belong. More and more Whites are beginning to understand this, including the bulk of the British army. Ordinary soldiers have reacted defiantly to the discharge of one of their comrades “for the ‘crime’ of posing for a selfie with Tommy Robinson.”

Tommy Robinson is a shabbos goy like Sajid Javid, but ordinary soldiers support Robinson because he wants to expose and end the activities of Muslim rape-gangs rather than cover them up and prolong them. After the discharge of the Robinson-fan, ordinary soldiers had these messages for their traitorous, politically correct senior officers: “They can’t discharge us all!” and “#IAmTommy.” Civil war is on its way in Britain and in many other Western nations. When it arrives, the military and the police are not going to side with the traitors and shabbos goyim at the top.

After the civil war is over, we can begin trials for those politicians, bureaucrats, journalists and academics who were responsible for the Huddersfield Horrorshow and all other vibrant enrichments committed against ordinary Whites. I am not Tommy, but I am White and I want my country back.

Go to Appendix to Huddersfield Horrorshow: The Observer Obfuscates