A reader dropped an article in the comments:

Sweden should be “filled” with Islamist terrorists so that anti-mass immigration, rural, working class Swedes are forced into exile, the opinion editor of a left-wing news site has said. Teodor Stig-Matz wrote on Nyheter24 that he would “honestly fill the land with IS soldiers” if it meant the sort of people who vote for the Sweden Democrats (SD) disappeared. He wrote his column as an open letter to Kent Ekeroth, a senior SD MP who has previously said that mass immigration is “Islamising” Sweden. …“I think that we are not so different, you and I, Kent. The attitude you and your party have towards immigrants resembles the way I look at your party and voters.” He goes on to list a number of items from Swedish working class culture that he despises, adding that the sorts of people who vote for the Sweden Democrats “talk with disgusting dialects”. “I think you dirty our country,” he says, adding: “Your version of Swedish culture is just as meaningless as an IKEA bookcase, and equally as greasy as the béarnaise sauce you drown your food in.” He goes on to say that while he does not share Mr Ekeroth’s views on migrants, he cannot get angry over his “xenophobia” because he feels the same towards SD supporters.

This is a perfect example of the r-strategy’s natural alliance with outsiders, as part of it’s migratory evolutionary history. Leftists are designed to embrace the out-group, adopt its ideals and mores, embrace its culture, and turn on their own as means of facilitating migration to the out-group’s lands, should resources fall short at home. It is r-strategy 101.

What I have been wondering is, how could we present to leftists evidence that they are out-groups to their own lands, and we view them as our out-groups, as way of triggering these urges in reverse, so they will ally with their own nations? Is there a way to make the right so foreign to leftists that they would ally with us? Why do they not ally with us now, when we are so dissimilar?

The only thing I can think of is a variant of “by our fruits they should know us.”

Right now, despite our rhetoric, we are very much like the left’s idea of what Americans are. We don’t rape, we don’t murder, we try to be reasonable and friendly, we don’t engage in violence, and so on. We talk about being different, but we don’t tangibly act different.

It makes me wonder if we created an alt-right subculture, obsessed with fight-club-like violence, with leaders picked through fighting tournaments, with celebrations of violence and misogyny, with a noticeable push to humorously break political correctness barriers, and so on, whether many leftists would embrace it due to their Stockholm-Syndrome-like urges being tripped.

This kind of subculture already exists to some extent, and I have noticed it has seemed successful in converting leftist to a more rightward ideology. That subculture is /pol on 4Chan.

I was reading /pol and was struck by how many leftists post, saying they showed up there, and were initially shocked by the scene, only to have been fascinated and converted to alt-right red-pillers, for reasons they still seemed fuzzy on and uncertain of. I have wondered if we are seeing some sort of nascent triggering of that Stockholm-instinct in leftists who happen on that site.

From the posts I have seen, those leftists are struck by several things. One, /pol is completely politically incorrect. From racial slurs, to ethnic jokes, to insults, to racist caricatures, and so on, /pol is shockingly politically incorrect.

Two, /pol is funny. A few have said the contrast of the humor has attracted them. I would assume because it is a sign of total gives-no-fuck, unashamedness and utter lack of weakness. Nobody on /pol is apologizing, or about to grovel.

Three would be the facts. These converts say once they read them on /pol, the facts suddenly appeared clear to them. I think I see the mechanism at play here.

If a leftist shows up on a website and sees a post that says migrant rapists are bad, they will get triggered, and reject the premise because it is painful to the amygdala, and no matter what you say they will lock you out of their brain.

On /pol, the first post is about how Hitler was the good guy in WWII. The second post is a “Nigger hate thread” which talks about blacks needing to be exterminated in the coming white ethnostate, and features all sorts of historical photos of lynchings and dead bodies, as well as some pics of naked fat black women that are disgusting in a way that is difficult to describe in words. The next thread is a “Gook hate/gore thread” complete with surveillance camera videos of Asian men beating small children to death on the street for no reason at all, torturing animals, and running innocent people down with cars, often jumping out and stabbing them with swords to be sure they are dead. Then you come to the Holocaust threads.

By the time you get to the thread with the facts about Muslim migrant crime rates in Sweden, even the most leftist amygdalae are so worn out they can’t get triggered, so the facts are able to drift in unobstructed. It is amygdala-desensitization on steroids, and it is connecting people to the moderately tough realities of the world by sadistically making them endure the absolute worst the globe has to offer, to a ridiculous degree, so the regular reality is not that bad.

Once you open yourself to that first red pill, you are conditioned to question your own wisdom and absorb an idea from /pol, meaning subsequent ideas can drift in more easily. And it is all down hill from there. That is amygdala-based cognitive deprogramming from the cult of leftism.

Interspersed throughout the horrors at /pol are pictures of pretty girls, pictures of interesting scenes and facts, funny memes, and clever, funny, often politically incorrect comments that will make you laugh out loud, and keep you scrolling down through the horrors for more. Sometimes they come up with stuff so fascinating you can’t turn away, like secret bases they discovered on satellite photos in the middle of nowhere, and details about news stories that blow your mind. The awfulness of the worst stimuli may actually make the girls seem prettier, the memes more interesting, the fascinating stuff more rewarding, and the jokes seem funnier. You worked hard and endured awfulness to get to all of them.

This is probably like what will happen at the Apocalypse. You leave for work, step over a dismembered torso on your front stoop, your neighbor makes a joke about not losing your head, you dodge a highway robbery on your way to work, you find out your boss was raped by a street gang the night before so he is out sick, your company is going out of business and now you have no job, and on your way home from work you watch a bridge collapse. By the time you get home and see a crime stat on the evening news about migrants, you can absorb it because compared to everything else, it is harmless.

There is gold in there with respect to the study of using cognitive neuroscience to advance the reality-based ideologies we will need as the Apocalypse sets in. As in so many cases, I do not think there is much of any use for advancing the left. They need to put their people in bubbles, and shield them from anything even vaguely triggering. As for the moderates and right, once you can endure triggering, the left’s world is pure ultra-controlled, oppressive dystopia.

We need to do more study of this. We need more leftists having their amygdala unbalanced and brains opened up, and their entire worldviews shifted. Because once we open their eyes, they will never want to be blind again.

Tell others about r/K Theory, because if you know how the brain works, you can control it