Esperanto has many sounds that are difficult for somebody in the world. For example, I can't easily distinguish between z and s, or between ĵ and ŝ - so do I change all z/ĵ-words to s/ŝ-words?! No! Because that distinction IS in the language, so I have to get used to it.



So should English/French speakers do with ĥ. Ĥ is a great sound that's completely NOT worth changing or getting rid of.



Sure, Ĥino was (unfortunately!) completely replaced by Ĉino, so I use the latter too, but with all other ĥ-words, I still use the ĥ-form. It just isn't necessary to change ĥ to k or h, so why do this? It only makes ĥ even harder to pronounce, since you no longer practise it frequently when speaking Esperanto.



I also believe that Meksiko should be *Meĥiko, but as the latter isn't used at all, I stick to Meksiko, otherwise that would be a kind of reform.



BTW, Ĉeĥujo isn't the only country with ĥ that has no alternative form: Liĥtenŝtejno exists.