You aren’t sorry and you are also wrong. This doesn’t “generalize” white people at all. It recognizes a collective action that is real and undeniable. White people do this.

Did I even say “all”?

Yet, you felt the need to jump in and demand that white supremacy can only be criticized so long as qualifiers of “not all” are employed. No. That’s not going to happen. We white people don’t remotely deserve that. Because in case you haven’t noticed, most racist white people ALSO identify as that “not all”. They (you) demand it not out of any sincere concern for the generalizing of white people, but to derail criticism of white privilege and white supremacy.

White people are oppressive. I don’t care if its not all. For me to insist on such a distinct as a white person would be to demand unreasonable restrictions on communication based on imagined inferences just to hamper discussion of an oppression that costs people of color a lot more than hurt feelings. It is EXTREMELY fair to point out oppression done by white people. Especially oppression that very much IS done for the benefit of ALL white people. Cuz I can criticize this with my last dying breath but that won’t make my white privilege go away. It won’t stop racists from seeing the color of my skin and assuming me as a kindred spirit. White people say nonsense like the above to benefit ALL white people even if NOT ALL white people are saying it.

You want to be “NOT ALL” white people? That’s on you. It is YOUR responsibility to act accordingly AND it is your responsibility to never feel entitled to any kind of cookies of gold stars for doing so AND it is your responsibility to respect that no matter what you do people who have been targeted by white supremacy may never feel even a tiny of silver of trust in you. What you don’t do is run around demanding “NOT ALL” qualifiers where “ALL” was never so much as implied in the first place. If that’s the route you take, then you are just the whole problem with “NOT ALL” white people in the first place.