Re: Mock for Tuesday

I'd like to test out Wall Street rebuttals (to attack on donations) I agree with Karen on testing raise-your-taxes back and forth. > On Dec 6, 2015, at 2:16 PM, Karen Dunn <KDunn@BSFLLP.com> wrote: > > Thanks! > > I want to understand the degree to which taxing the middle class still resonates. I am sure there are a number of ways to frame this. Four years ago, invocation of the middle class (growing, expanding, strengthening) in all things was huge. Is this still the case? > > And of course now there is much you are probably already testing re: national security and guns. Would be interested to know how much "keeping our families safe" trumps other related valences since it would be a sweet spot for her as a female CiC. > > > > ----- > From: Mandy Grunwald [gruncom@aol.com] > Sent: Sunday, December 06, 2015 02:12 PM Eastern Standard Time > To: Ron Klain > Cc: John Podesta; jim.margolis@gmmb.com; jbenenson@bsgco.com; sara.solow@gmail.com; Kristina Costa; Tony Carrk; Huma Abedin; jsullivan@hillaryclinton.com; Jake.Sullivan@gmail.com; Karen Dunn; Karen Dunn; Barnett, Robert; ron.klain@revolution.com > Subject: Re: Mock for Tuesday > > > Mazel tov, Karen! > > And a question for the team. > > We are about to poll in NH and IA. Are there any thorny strategic questions for the debate where we feel we need guidance from a poll? > > Thx > > Mandy Grunwald > Grunwald Communications > 202 973-9400 > > > On Dec 6, 2015, at 2:09 PM, Ron Klain <rklain@aol.com> wrote: > >> Debate People, >> >> >> >> Attached is a full mock script for Tuesday. Please review and comment. >> >> >> >> As for the session itself, we will do some Q-and-A drills before we start the mock. So we won’t get through this entire mock, but we will use pieces of it. I will send around a proposed agenda later today. >> >> >> >> And of course, Karen will be having a baby on Tuesday early morning, so, she’ll probably be an hour or two late for our 9am start. >> >> >> >> Ron >> >> <HRC16-Debates-3rdDebate-Mock1-1206-r.docx> > > The information contained in this electronic message is confidential information intended only for the use of the named recipient(s) and may contain information that, among other protections, is the subject of attorney-client privilege, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this electronic message is not the named recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the named recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and no privilege is waived. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this electronic message and then deleting this electronic message from your computer. [v.1]