This article is more than 4 years old

This article is more than 4 years old

The corporate tax system should be radically overhauled in the wake of the row over how much Google should pay in the UK, the former Conservative chancellor Nigel Lawson has said.



Google's tax deal with the UK: key questions answered Read more

The peer said corporation tax had “had its day” and should largely be replaced with a tax on sales to prevent large-scale avoidance by multinationals.



Google has agreed to pay £130m in back taxes covering the last decade in a deal struck by HM Revenue and Customs, which was hailed as a victory by George Osborne.



The chancellor has argued that Google was previously paying no tax and pointed to the introduction last year of a diverted profits tax to target companies that artificially shift revenues from Britain to countries with lower tax rates.

However, critics claimed the internet giant was effectively paying just 3% tax and called for the arrangement to be investigated by the National Audit Office and the European commission.

Google crosses borders. The tax collectors should too | Jonathan Freedland Read more

Lord Lawson, who was chancellor in Margaret Thatcher’s governments between 1983 and 1989, told the Telegraph: “It is profoundly unsatisfactory that corporation tax has to be collected from large multinational corporations by a series of ad hoc compromise deals, as we have once again seen with the Google affair. It is also grossly unfair on smaller businesses, who are unable to shift profits between tax jurisdictions and have to pay the full amount due under UK law.

“I have long argued that in the modern world corporation tax has had its day as a major source of tax revenue. It needs to be a much lesser tax, bolstered by a tax on corporate sales. While multinationals can artificially shift profits to whatever tax jurisdictions they choose, sales are where they are, and can’t be shifted.”

He added: “Instead of endless discussion at international conferences of one kind or another, the UK should take the lead in implementing this much-needed reform.”