The lawmaker leading the impeachment inquiry into President Trump Donald John TrumpFederal prosecutor speaks out, says Barr 'has brought shame' on Justice Dept. Former Pence aide: White House staffers discussed Trump refusing to leave office Progressive group buys domain name of Trump's No. 1 Supreme Court pick MORE said Saturday that Democrats are "making rapid progress" in their investigation into the president's dealings with Ukraine.



“We’re trying to work expeditiously, but we’re also trying to be methodical in our work," Rep. Adam Schiff Adam Bennett SchiffSchiff to subpoena top DHS official, alleges whistleblower deposition is being stonewalled Schiff claims DHS is blocking whistleblower's access to records before testimony GOP lawmakers distance themselves from Trump comments on transfer of power MORE (D-Calif.), chairman of the Intelligence Committee, told reporters in the Capitol. "I think we’re making rapid progress — and that’s our goal.”

Schiff's comments came after the Intelligence Committee had finished interviewing its latest witness in the quickly evolving impeachment investigation into Trump, which launched just over a month ago.



Philip Reeker, acting assistant secretary of European and Eurasian Affairs, testified behind closed doors for roughly eight hours about what he knew of the administration's campaign to press Ukrainian leaders to launch anti-corruption investigations into Trump's political rivals.





ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Schiff declined to comment on the substance of Reeker's testimony. But other lawmakers from both parties leaving the deposition seemed to agree that Reeker was a relatively minor player in the controversial Ukrainian episode — one verified details previously presented by other witnesses, without unloading any bombshells."An honest assessment ... is that there were no 'A-Ha' moments for either side," said Rep.(R-N.C.), the former Freedom Caucus chairman and close Trump ally.In the eyes of Trump's GOP allies, that means there was no new evidence of presidential wrongdoing on a level to merit impeachment. Meadows said Reeker essentially echoed testimony from an earlier witness — former U.S. envoy to Ukraine— whose deposition Republicans have pointed to as an "exoneration" of Trump's actions in Ukraine."In broad terms, I’d say the testimony of Ambassador Volker and his role in the Ukraine was supported by what we heard from Ambassador Reeker today," Meadows said. "And Ambassador Volker’s testimony, I believe, was very clear in that he didn’t believe that the president of the United States did anything that would amount to an impeachable offense.”Democrats, however, left the marathon deposition suggesting they'd reached a different conclusion about the direction the accumulating evidence is taking congressional investigators — lawmakers will ultimately have to decide whether to take a long step forward and vote on impeachment articles."He is corroborating previous witnesses and their testimony. So it's helpful in that respect," Rep.(D-Mass.) said of Reeker. "I think it's fair to say it's a much richer reservoir of information than we originally expected.""No discrepancies," said Rep.(D-N.J.).Democrats have been charging ahead with their impeachment inquiry since Speaker(D-Calif.) launched the probe formally just over a month ago. That escalation came in response to a whistleblower's allegations that Trump had sought to leverage U.S. aid to press Ukraine's president for political favors.In May, amid that pressure campaign, Secretary of Statehad recalled Marie Yovanovitch, then the U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine, back to Washington. Yovanovitch has since testified as part of the impeachment probe, alleging that she was removed as political payback because she'd voiced concerns with the effort to enlist foreign leaders for help in domestic elections.Reeker, a State Department veteran, reportedly testified Saturday that he'd pressed senior State Department officials to support Yovanovitch publicly, but was rejected by the agency brass.Pompeo's approach to the Ukrainian affair has angered many State Department veterans, who believe he's done too little to protect career diplomats from the political influence of the White House.Meadows said Saturday that he's sympathetic to those sentiments. But the president, he added, has the ultimate power to decide which diplomats will serve him abroad."Generally speaking, a lot of the State Department employees have a high regard for Ambassador Yovanovitch. ... That’s a consistent theme that we’ve heard throughout," Meadows said. "That being said, all ambassadors serve at the pleasure of the president. And that’s just part of what happens when you’re part of a diplomatic corps."You certainly serve in a selfless way," he continued, "but also in one that is subject to coming to a new post any day."The rare Saturday gathering took place because Congress had paused its work Thursday and Friday to honor the late Rep.(D-Md.), the chairman of the Oversight Committee who passed away on Oct. 17 after a lengthy illness.Democrats plan to charge ahead with the depositions next week, although several of the witnesses on the calendar have contested the subpoenas, leaving their appearance in question.Democratic leaders have also promised, at some point, to open up the process and hold public hearings. But the timeline to do so remains unclear."It hasn't been determined," said Rep.(D-N.Y.), chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

Updated 9:01 p.m.