Ferrum Master Well I am afraid this lil critter is still 40nm silicon...

revanchrist They should put in Bay Trail D (Desktop) J2900 (10W TDP) SoC.

thevoiceofreason VIA Nano (and before that C7/C5) have also been used for many years in HP thin client range, following the acquisition of Neoware in 2007. Wyse has also used them extensively (acquired by Dell in 2012).



Nano is a capable little core but didn't compete very well at high frequencies in terms of TDP in part due to the 40nm process. Also, traditionally, the VIA southbridge-integrated GPUs ("Chrome") have been rubbish, but the CPU core might continue to do well in nettops and perhaps even carve a bit out of the microserver market (AFAIR Dell tried it before with VIA chips in what I think was codenamed Fortuna).

i am talking about limiting the Atom Soc for those device ...oh you thought i was talking about Silvermont Z3770 for those device well 28nm is standard and 40nm can still be found in Smartphones tablet and padphones.my Razr i has a Z2480 (32nm) and it's a pretty damn good Soc (mind you single X86 core HT 2.0ghz and scoring like a 4 A9 core Exynos 4412 stock, and up to 3 days 14 hrs battery time, yet on heavy use it does 1d-1d21hrs) yet Atom for anything else is ... meh ... not even on the small toe of a Isaiah II so let alone a Kabini APUwell maybe server Atom 16core ... iirc i saw a news about theses, but if they need 16core to get ahead of those 2 4core.... again ... meh...seems on low power SOC any other than Intel has it good...well yeah and also add some graphical bench to do a good comparison (/sarcasm), the Athlon 5350 would be way more ahead (what's a SOC if it has a crappy GPU even if it does 10-15w less ) let say the main force of Kabini is to be a APU with a good IGP (excepted for the higher tdp tho)do that with a Kabini Fs1b platform and you have a similar setup, but without a soldered CPU.