In light of the most recent European immigration drama, a good friend had brought up the topic of an old book, The Camp of The Saints, a 1973 French-language apocalyptic novel by one Jean Raspail. We have not read the novel ourselves, having both an ignorance of French and the observation that the only version available in English is a translation made by a Jew as barriers to so doing. However understanding the reference, and the fact that the book portrays the end of Europe and Western Civilization as a whole in a flood of savage immigrants from Africa, we understand that the book certainly was portentous. The title of the book is a reference to words that are found in Revelation chapter 20:

“And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison, 8 And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them together to battle: the number of whom is as the sand of the sea. 9 And they went up on the breadth of the earth, and compassed the camp of the saints about, and the beloved city: and fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them.”

Only a pious Christian would understand that the White nations formerly known as Christendom were indeed the camp of the saints referred to in the Revelation. Only a pious Christian who was also very understanding of history could understand that the Jews collectively are “Satan”, a Hebrew word that means adversary, since they have forever set themselves in opposition to Christ. In this light are they portrayed by Paul of Tarsus, who described them as those “Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and the prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men” (1 Thessalonians 2:15).

Just as interesting is a Southern Poverty Law Center response to the Raspail book. In an undated article on its website, the SPLC quotes a description given by one publisher of the book where it says “The book is a racist fantasy about an invasion of France and the white Western world by a fleet of starving, dark-skinned refugees, 'a haunting and prophetic vision … of Western Civilization overrun by a burgeoning Third World population.'” Then lamenting the growing popularity of the book, the SPLC adds: “The book characterizes non-whites as horrific and uncivilized 'monsters' who will stop at nothing to greedily and violently seize what rightfully belongs to the white man.”

However even the Gatestone Institute, a rather liberal New York think tank founded by Jews and hosting articles from liberal Jewish luminaries such as Alan Dershowitz, cannot ignore what the importation of tens of thousands of Africans has done for Sweden. They reported in an article entitled Sweden: Rape Capital of the West the following:

“Forty years after the Swedish parliament unanimously decided to change the formerly homogeneous Sweden into a multicultural country, violent crime has increased by 300% and rapes by 1,472%. Sweden is now number two on the list of rape countries, surpassed only by Lesotho in Southern Africa…. Sweden is now number two on the global list of rape countries. According to a survey from 2010, Sweden, with 53.2 rapes per 100,000 inhabitants, is surpassed only by tiny Lesotho in Southern Africa, with 91.6 rapes per 100,000 inhabitants.”

It should be no surprise that the only people who can out-rape Africans in Sweden are Africans in Africa. Liberals delivered women from the patriarchy of White men to turn them over to the perversions of savage beasts. But many rapes of European, Canadian, Australian or American women by third-world immigrants are unreported, because the women are viewed as harming their own political sympathies if they do venture to report such instances. For example, Breitbart.com recently reported that a “No-Borders Activist” working as a volunteer in a camp on the French border with Italy was raped and reluctant to report the crime because “Colleagues are alleged to have said that reporting the crime would set back their struggle for a borderless world.” We can only wonder how many “No-Borders Activists” are in Israel as they build fences to keep the non-Jewish aliens out.

So it is in Germany as well. The Daily Mail has recently reported a “Germany in a state of siege: Merkel was cheered when she opened the floodgates to migrants. Now, with gangs of men roaming the streets and young German women being told to cover up, the mood's changing”. And this reflects the most basic lack of understanding among western liberals: that third-world people, if we must concede that they are people, do not share Western values.

Reportedly, over 2,000 refugee camps have sprung up across Germany, and some towns fear being consumed entirely by the refugees. The Daily Mail shares a report from a migrant camp in Glessen in that same article, where it says that “There are even reports of children being raped and subjected to sexual assault…. Many women have felt the need to sleep in their clothes... they won’t go to the toilet at night because rapes and assaults have taken place on their way to, or from, there. Even in daylight, a walk through the camp is fraught with fear…. It is a fact that women and children are unprotected. This situation is opportune for those men who already regard women as their inferiors and treat unaccompanied women as 'fair game'.”

When immigrants or refugees entering a nation do not respect the laws, customs and property of the people they have come to dwell among, and they continue steadfast in their refusal to respect those things, then they cannot appropriately be classified as immigrants or refugees. More truthfully, they are colonists and invaders and prospective conquerors of the nations they enter. Only the most deceived fools would be led to think otherwise.

It is only rather recently in European history that all of the various White tribes have come to an understanding under the rule of law that women may wander the streets unescorted by men in relative safety, and it is only Christian ethics which have made that at all possible. And in spite of Christian moral sensitivity, it is only those same ethics and that same rule of law which those ethics have afforded that allows women to choose to walk around in public in a state that we can only call half-naked, without fear of being raped or even sold into sex slavery.

But muslim “immigrants” do not care about the laws of Western society. They actually see themselves as victorious conquerors in a religious war against Christianity, and desire to establish their own laws and, ultimately, their own governments, on the land which would be formerly known as Europe. Neither do they care about White women or children, Christian or otherwise. One glaring recent example is the child abuse scandal which occurred in Rotherham, England. As it was reported by the BBC and other English media, between 1997 and 2013 a ring of Pakistanis were able to rape upwards of 1,400 young White girls, many of them gang-raped, and while authorities were frequently asked to investigate the problem they refused to act on the reports for fear of being labeled as “racist”.

A study of British history reveals that all of the successful prior invasions of Britain were only successful with the assistance of British traitors. These officials in Rotherham should be near the top of the list. One significant event we may compare the Rotherham incident to is the uprising of Boudica. This woman was a queen whose husband died and had left a will splitting his kingdom between the Roman emperor Nero and his own two daughters. The Romans ignored the will, annexed the kingdom of the Iceni, had Boudica beaten and had raped her daughters. When this happened, Boudica organized a revolt, and 100,000 men of the Iceni and other British tribes joined her. They marched on Roman-occupied London, destroyed the city, as many as 70 to 80 thousand Romans and their British allies were killed. While Boudica was eventually defeated and the uprising quenched, the Romans in Britain remained demoralized for a long time.

So in the first century two British girls of the Iceni get raped, and it causes a revolt where as many as 80 thousand of the Romans and their sympathizers are killed in retaliation. But now in this era, when 1,400 young British girls are raped by aliens, Brits retaliate by posting cartoons on Facebook and then they go back to their ale and their football. What they should be doing is hanging the invading Paki bastards from trees, and the council officials along with them. There should already be millions of dead Paki muslims and their sympathizers in Rotherham, if today's Brits were anything like their Iceni ancestors.

But the English authorities would rather see the destruction of innumerable English youth than be labeled as 'racist', which is a full reflection of the terrors of a Marxist tyranny. Europe was at one time Christian, and Europeans had liberty in Christ. Having neglected Christ, Europeans now live subject to the whims of the enemies of Christ. The proof is in their own words as we see the desires of the enemies of Christ fulfilled throughout the formerly Christian and soon to be formerly White nations.

Jews pass themselves off as White, and then often lead the way in race-mixing themselves, so that they can serve as examples that race-mixing is righteous and should be accepted by all. For instance, a Chicago Jew named John Chatz wrote an article titled “I'm a White Man and my Child Will be Black”. But he is really a liar out to deceive unsuspecting Whites, because he is really a Jew and Jews are not White, a fact which academic Jews themselves often openly admit. The Times of Israel recently celebrated a mixed Asian-Jewish couple from America who are said to be “the leading, and virtually only, experts on Asian-Jewish intermarriage in the United States”, as if such a subject required so-called experts. They are actually far behind fellow Jew Henry Makow, an internet pundit posing as a conservative traditionalist, who has actively promoted intermarriage between Whites and Asians for many years.

Where Whites do not intermarry, they are being encouraged by both Judeo-Christian churches (which is really doublespeak for Jewish-controlled churches) and the Jewish-controlled media to adopt black babies. CNN recently published an article entitled Overseas adoptions rise -- for black American children which made the claim that “most American families were, and still are, interested in adopting a white infant”. That too is a lie, since many White families have taken to adopting blacks from Africa, which their Jewish-controlled churches have encouraged. One notable instance is found in a Daily Mail report on a Tennessee family which adopted 8 so-called children from Sierra Leone, who in turn expect to be supported by their church. It is incredibly amazing, how easy it has been for the Jews and their Jewish-controlled media to get Whites in Europe and America to marry themselves off to non-Whites and have children, thereby destroying their own race forever because the Jews tell them that it is right to do so!

But when Whites do not mix with the other races willingly, the Jews have a more sinister agenda...

We have long had a video posted at Christogenea which we had titled The Effrontery of Judaism, but which evidently was excerpted from an English-language news story from Sweden. In this particular segment, an interviewer states that “As we heard, there are people in Sweden who support Israel, and have a deep sense of the injustice of the present situation. It’s these people who give hope to those who still believe that things will get better here.” But the situation being referred to is rather ambiguous. Are they talking about some situation in Israel? Or in Sweden? The interviewer continues: “One of them is Barbara Lerner Spectre, a former American who made ‘aliyah’ [a Jewish word describing the Jewish ritual of relocation to the Israeli state in Palestine] and then ten years ago, with the help of the government of Sweden, set up a non-denominational institute of Jewish learning with the Greek name ‘Paideia’ [which she also calls ‘The European Institute for Jewish Studies in Sweden] here in Stockholm.” Why there should be Jewish studies in Sweden is not made clear, but then we hear: “She believes that the current wave of anti-semitism in Sweden will pass, and that jews have an important role to play in a country undergoing profound change.” Why there is anti-semitism in Sweden is not made clear, nor is it even quantified. We have not read any substantial reports of anti-semitism in Sweden, and most Swedes do not seem concerned with Jewish affairs outside of Sweden. Neither is it clear why Barbara Spectre's visit to Israel had anything to do with Sweden, except to perhaps establish her credentials as a Jew. And she is not even a Swedish Jew, but one who was born in America. However the Swedes seem to be financing whatever Spectre is doing in Sweden, and we can also wonder who got them to do that!

Next in the news clip is Barbara Spectre herself responding to the interviewer: “I think there is a resurgence of anti-semitism because, at this point in time, Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural [meaning racially-mixed]. And I think we [meaning Jews] are going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Europe [meaning all the countries of Europe] is not going to be the monolithic societies [meaning racially homogenous nations] that they once were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the center of that. It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode, and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role, and without that transformation, Europe will not survive.” [We have added remarks in brackets so that the reader can better understand the motivation of the speakers.]

Apparently, Barbara Spectre's mind-numbing propagandizing of Swedes has worked rather well, as in a September 4th, 2015 article the UK Independent ran an article under the headline Refugee crisis: Sweden the only European country with a majority favourable towards non-EU immigration. But the article editorializes much more on the rest of Europe rather than on Sweden, as it begins by saying: “If statistics alone are the judge, then the staggering 800,000 to one million refugees who are expected to apply for asylum in Germany this year have put the country streets ahead of all its neighbours in the EU’s response to the worst refugee crisis to hit Europe since the Second World War.” The article goes on to portray the acceptance of non-EU immigration in the various European nations:

Between 71 and 77 per cent approve [speaking of Sweden], according to a recent Eurostat survey. At the bottom of the list come Italy, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Estonia and Latvia where only between 15 and 21 per cent welcome immigrants. They are followed closely by Hungary, Bulgaria and Greece, where between 22 and 28 per cent of the population is positive towards non-EU immigration.... In the most heavily populated EU member-states including Britain, Ireland France, Spain, and Belgium, a range of between 49 and 29 per cent have a positive view of non-EU immigration.

Notice the last figures given in the poll are reversed, and rather than saying “between 29 and 49 per cent”, the usual convention, it says “between 49 and 29 per cent” as if to emphasize the higher number. But wait a second…

Less than 49% of the people of any European nation would accept non-EU immigration? Are not the European nations all “democratic”, meaning that a majority of the people should be able to decide the futures of each of their respective nations? So if Sweden is the only European nation with a majority in favor of non-Eu immigration, why are non-EU immigrants even being allowed into other nations? They should all be going to Sweden! As for the Swedes, apparently they enjoy being raped.

So if the European nations are not really democracies after all, as the media itself proves every time it conducts such polls with any degree of honesty, then who is actually running Europe? There is another video which we have hosted at Christogenea for several years now, featuring a Jewish woman named Annette Kahane, where among other things she said “You have to really change the policy of immigration inside Europe. This is very important, you have to adopt the educational system and adapt all the self understanding of the states. They are not anymore only white or only Swedish or only Portuguese or only German. They are multicultural places in the world.” In yet another video which we also host and which is also several years old, a Jew named Ervin Kohn laments the fact that Norway is a homogeneous White society, and he discusses the work which he and the organization which he founded there, the so-called “Norwegian Center against Racism”, must do in order to change that situation in Norway.

These videos which we cite are only three examples out of a plethora of evidence that Jews are the primary proponents of the acceptance by the various governments of this mass immigration into Europe, in spite of the will of the people themselves. It should be relatively easy to understand, that if this acceptance of mass immigration is the desire of these Jews, but not the desire of the majority of Europeans, then it is these Jews who are in political control of Europe, and not Europeans. The nations of Europe are not democracies, and they are not oligarchies. They may be considered Plutocracies, nations ruled by wealth. But more accurately, they are Jewocracies, they are run by the Jews and the public perception is controlled through the Jewish-controlled media. The same is true in America, Canada, and Australia. Ostensibly, the polls are only taken to measure the success of media influence and the possibility of resistance.

All of this is happening while in the Israeli state, refugees are being threatened with prison if they do not leave the country, regardless of any refugee status they may actually have. The Washington Post recently reported in an article titled Israeli government to refugees: Go back to Africa or go to prison that “As Europe struggles to stem a spring flood of migrants from Africa and the Middle East trying to cross a deadly Mediterranean Sea, Israel has begun to toughen its stance toward refugees, telling unwanted Africans here they must leave now or face an indefinite stay in prison.” So Jews can be Jews and practice Judaism exclusively in Israel, but Jews in Europe insist that Whites surrender both their religious exclusivity and their racial homogeneity to non-Whites. Such Jewish hypocrisy is an innate feature of their character, as it is recorded in Matthew chapter 23 that Jesus Christ had told the Jews of His time:

“But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in.”

While it is evident with such a remark that Jews would rather destroy the Kingdom of Heaven than do what it takes to have a part in it, it is further evident where Christ continued to speak, that those who would follow the Jews become twice as corrupted as the Jews themselves:

“Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.”

Race is not a social construct: Society is a racial construct. When Europe, America and the other White Nations are completely overrun with aliens, they will simply cease to be Europe or America. Instead, they shall become a greater Syria, a larger Turkey, a northern Africa, or a continent-wide Mexico. Whites have moved on to other lands many times in history and wherever they went they have created great societies. But now there are no new lands to move to. Shall White society end forever to the amusement of the Jews? Once a race becomes mixed, the damage can never be repaired. For that reason we have Syria, Egypt, and the abject poverty of Africa and East Asia, Haiti and Cuba and Mexico.





Jean Raspail and his novel The Camp of the Saints are now being vindicated on a daily basis. One group of Jews plays the role of Satan, the “bad cop”, while another much smaller group of Jews, who have no real impact on policy, are assigned the role of “good cop”, and the likes of David Horowitz, Pamela Geller, Melanie Philips or Caroline Glick formulate the mainstream “opposition” voice so that Jews can control both sides of the argument, and those who still read can never see the real devil. But there is a third group of Jews, such as those at the Southern Poverty Law Center, who scoff at it all and deny what is happening in plain sight. As Jesus Christ had told the most influential Jews of His time:

“Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.”

The God of Creation will not be mocked by these devils forever. There is only one remedy. Come Out of Her My People! Arise and Thresh, O Daughter of Zion! When will White Europeans stand up for themselves and fulfill the vision of another great White man who also saw what was coming, even before Raspail wrote his novel, to create those Rivers of Blood by which all Whites everywhere must defend themselves against extinction?