When I was asked to run the Democratic Party after the Russians hacked our emails, I stumbled onto a shocking truth about the Clinton campaign. -Donna Brazile

Make no mistake, this politico article, written by Donna Brazile, is nothing more than a plug for her soon-to-be-released book, "HACKS: The Inside Story of the Break-ins and Breakdowns That Put Donald Trump in the White House" to be released November 9th, 2017.

Like rats fleeing from a sinking ship, she's the latest Washington insider to see the writing on the wall and begin the process of cutting ties to the Clinton machine. If I can take the liberty of reading into her words, she's cozying up to Senator Bernie Sanders.

Everything in this article is written to make Bernie Sanders seem calm, intelligent, sophisticated, and, more importantly, the victim. Keep your Anti-Bias Glasses on when you read her story, and more importantly, how she tells it and what emotions she is trying to illicit.

As with anything in politics, the push is to tell you HOW to feel about something, not just provide you objective facts in which to base your own opinion on.

Specifically, this article confirms two things:

The shockingly atrocious writing style of Donna Brazile. It's written as if voice-translated by Siri. Something that many of us who have been paying attention knew all along. *The Clinton machine played by their own rules, unethically used power politics, bend campaign finance rules to politically profit, and corrupt the Democratic National Committee's process ensuring she was the Democrat's candidate going into the 2016 election.

Brazile discusses that her journey to 'get to the bottom of it' started after her heartfelt promise to Bernie Sanders that she would investigate the inner dealings of the DNC.

She perpetuates the "Russia-hacking-emails" narrative without paying any lip service to the underhanded corruption that was exposed in the hacked emails.

She tells the reader she REALLY wants to get to the bottom of the "Russia-hacking" since it represents a threat to the sanctity and integrity of our election system. Seemingly with a straight face, she doesn't seem to mention exactly how the Russians convinced her to leak town-hall questions to Hillary Clinton prior to one of the debates.

By passing up the opportunity to apologize for her part in damaging election integrity, it becomes quite evident that 'integrity' is not her ultimate goal.

The biggest bombshell is how the Clinton Machine raked millions in DNC contributions away from the States' coffers damaging down-ticket Democratic candidates.

I had tried to search out any other evidence of internal corruption that would show that the DNC was rigging the system to throw the primary to Hillary, but I could not find any in party affairs or among the staff. I had gone department by department, investigating individual conduct for evidence of skewed decisions, and I was happy to see that I had found none. Then I found this agreement.

The funding arrangement with HFA and the victory fund agreement was not illegal, but it sure looked unethical. If the fight had been fair, one campaign would not have control of the party before the voters had decided which one they wanted to lead. This was not a criminal act, but as I saw it, it compromised the party's integrity.

He described the party as fully under the control of Hillary's campaign, which seemed to confirm the suspicions of the Bernie camp. The campaign had the DNC on life support, giving it money every month to meet its basic expenses, while the campaign was using the party as a fund-raising clearing house. Under FEC law, an individual can contribute a maximum of $2,700 directly to a presidential campaign. But the limits are much higher for contributions to state parties and a party's national committee.

Individuals who had maxed out their $2,700 contribution limit to the campaign could write an additional check for $353,400 to the Hillary Victory Fund-that figure represented $10,000 to each of the thirty-two states' parties who were part of the Victory Fund agreement-$320,000-and $33,400 to the DNC. The money would be deposited in the states first, and transferred to the DNC shortly after that. Money in the battleground states usually stayed in that state, but all the other states funneled that money directly to the DNC, which quickly transferred the money to Brooklyn.

"Wait," I said. "That victory fund was supposed to be for whoever was the nominee, and the state party races. You're telling me that Hillary has been controlling it since before she got the nomination?"

Gary said the campaign had to do it or the party would collapse.

We wrote about this last year when the Politico story hit the streets, but for some reason, the media didn't find it scandalous enough to run.

Quite the opposite in fact. For the past 18 months, only Trump's ties to Russia have found headlines, however specious and lacking of merit they sometimes held.

When the Politico story described this arrangement as "essentially money laundering" for the Clinton campaign, Hillary's people were outraged at being accused of doing something shady. Bernie's people were angry for their own reasons, saying this was part of a calculated strategy to throw the nomination to Hillary.

She takes advantage of the 20/20 rearview mirror when describing her conversation with Bernie Sanders about the polls. When asked her opinion of Hillary's chances of success, she noted:

I had to be frank with him. I did not trust the polls, I said. I told him I had visited states around the country and I found a lack of enthusiasm for her everywhere.

This article, and what we'll likely see when the book is released, is a small part in a larger-scale rebalancing of the Democratic Party. This rebalancing will find the Clintons are no longer the premier power holders, and that is good.

I expect to see that vacuum to be quickly filled by Cory Booker, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, and any other closet (or proudly open) Socialist promising more government and FREE everything.