Monday, July 17th, 2017 (11:47 am) - Score 9,415

The Government has confirmed that, from April 2018 onwards, they will require broadband ISPs to block access to pornographic websites that fail to introduce at least a Credit Card based Age Verification system. This is intended to stop children being able to access naughty images and videos.

The measure was pushed into law earlier this year as part of the Digital Economy Act 2017, although until now some of the details have remained quite vague. Today the BBC has revealed a little bit more and also published an introduction date. It’s still expected that the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) will be tasked with regulating the system.

PART 3 Online pornography 14. Internet pornography: requirement to prevent access by persons under 18 (1) A person contravenes this subsection if the person makes pornographic material available on the internet to persons in the United Kingdom on a commercial basis other than in a way that secures that, at any given time, the material is not normally accessible by persons under the age of 18.

One of the many problems with the new approach is that all of the major broadband ISPs already offer subscribers an optional network-level filtering system (Parental Controls), which works well and allows users to choose whether or not they censor access to websites featuring “adult content.” Most parents already appear to be making use of this.

However the Government clearly wants to go further and so their new Age Verification policy is seen as one solution, which would apply to both sites in the UK and abroad. Obviously the UK can’t force such changes on non-UK sites, but they can require ISPs to block those that don’t comply.

The law also introduced a new power that forces payment services (e.g. VISA, Mastercard) to withdraw support from non-compliant sites and the Government can even impose a financial penalty of up to £250,000.

Matt Hancock, UK Digital Minister, said: “All this means that while we can enjoy the freedom of the web, the UK will have the most robust internet child protection measures of any country in the world.”

As ever there are plenty of other concerns about the new approach, although the Government has so far seen little problem with the privacy side of things. The new system would effectively force people to share their private personal and financial details with unreliable porn peddlers. The infamous Ashley Madison hack showed just how dangerous that can be (stolen info. fuelled multiple cases of blackmail and suicide etc.).

The United Nations has similarly warned that this approach lacks “data sharing safeguards” and may damage the vital “right to privacy and the right to freedom of expression” (here). On a more positive note the final Act did at least drop the “adult content” wording in favour of using the specific term “pornography,” which helps to mitigate some of the fears about mission creep.

However it’s still unclear whether the new measures will also be applied to Internet search engines like Google (i.e. when ‘Safe Search‘ is disabled) or the websites of certain UK newspapers that frequently post revealing pictures of semi-naked young women. Not forgetting that such pictures can also be found on social networks, such as Twitter. In that sense the new law presents a difficult dilemma for certain sites.

Meanwhile a lot of children have a good knowledge of I.T (usually more so than their parents) and will have no trouble finding one of the many easy ways to circumvent website blocks that have been imposed by a broadband ISP, which tend to be wafer thin in their effectiveness (this is not the ISPs fault, it’s just how the Internet itself works). Suffice to say that children who go actively seeking such content will have no trouble finding it.

UPDATE 1:19pm

A comment from the Open Rights Group.