Secret audio recordings between top Libyan and American officials obtained by the Washington Times reveal that the State Department cherry-picked intelligence on Libya that created a justification for war and passed it on to U.S. officials.

I'm not sure if I believe Gaddafi's protestations that he wasn't interested in the mass killing of civilians. He gunned down demonstrators with regularity – women and children included. The news here is that any intelligence to the contrary was apparently squelched, and the trio of Clinton, Power, and Rice shaped the debate over Libya to maneuver the U.S. into an unnecessary war.

It's also troublesome that a member of Congress and Pentagon officials were in contact with the Libyan government. James Baker says that this is unprecedented:

“If this story is true, it would be highly unusual for the Pentagon to conduct a separate set of diplomatic negotiations, given the way we operated when I was secretary of state,” James A. Baker III, who served under President George H.W. Bush, told The Times. “In our administration, the president made sure that we all sang from the same hymnal.” Mr. Kucinich, who challenged Mrs. Clinton and Barack Obama for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination, acknowledged that he undertook his own conversations with the Gadhafi regime. He said he feared Mrs. Clinton was using emotion to sell a war against Libya that wasn’t warranted, and he wanted to get all the information he could to share with his congressional colleagues. “I had facts that indicated America was headed once again into an intervention that was going to be disastrous,” Mr. Kucinich told The Times. “What was being said at the State Department — if you look at the charge at the time — it wasn’t so much about what happened as it was about what would happen. So there was a distortion of events that were occurring in Libya to justify an intervention which was essentially wrong and illegal.”

Proving that Clinton and the State Department manipulated intelligence to get the U.S. involved in the Libyan civil war will be difficult. But if intelligence officials who were in a position to know believe that to be the case, it will be a powerful argument supporting the facts of Clinton's deception.

Considering how Libya has turned out – a failed state racked by civil war, with the Islamic State now moving in – Hillary Clinton has a lot to answer for.