The idea behind my scientific paper, honestly, came from YouTube videos. Video after video kept saying that A is “impossible” because of B. And the only videos stating that A is “possible” were the kinds of videos that just don’t seem credible. Therefore, for a while, I accepted the former.

I believe, by the way, that someone, at some point, probably actually reads a scientific paper. Then, someone makes a video. Then, all the professional YouTubers copy that video and add a personal twist. That must be why so many videos state the same thing, even when the conclusion is wrong.

I’ve been downloading and reading papers from arXiv, and I’ve concluded that the videos I was watching are all wrong.

The majority of these papers actually state that my idea is theoretically possible. I haven’t found any experimental evidence yet, but I have devised my own, so maybe I’ll be the first.

Only one paper, thus far, states that my idea is impossible. However, I will refute the authors’ statement in my paper. This is because the authors disproved only one proposed idea, and then they cast a broad assertion that they disproved every potential idea.

However, the elements of my idea are not addressed in that paper at all. And the disproven idea is not a part of my experiments. Therefore, I am not sure how the authors can be so bold, especially considering the theoretical evidence that opposes them.

It is worth stating, again, that my argument will not be theoretical. It will be practical. I am going to cite the research that states that my idea is theoretically possible, but my Methods section will be entirely experimental.