President Trump Donald John TrumpObama calls on Senate not to fill Ginsburg's vacancy until after election Planned Parenthood: 'The fate of our rights' depends on Ginsburg replacement Progressive group to spend M in ad campaign on Supreme Court vacancy MORE for once united Washington on Wednesday — in shock.

Republicans and Democrats alike were left scratching their heads after the president did a deal with Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer Chuck SchumerPelosi orders Capitol flags at half-staff to honor Ginsburg Ginsburg in statement before her death said she wished not to be replaced until next president is sworn in Democrats call for NRA Foundation to be prohibited from receiving donations from federal employees MORE (D-N.Y.) and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) over the express wishes of the most senior members of his own party.

Trump signed up to terms proposed by the Democrats on government funding, which would soon have run out, and the nation’s debt ceiling, which would soon have been hit.

Crucially, another funding measure and another hike in the debt ceiling will be required before the end of the year.

ADVERTISEMENT

That’s a big problem for GOP leaders including Speaker Paul Ryan Paul Davis RyanKenosha will be a good bellwether in 2020 At indoor rally, Pence says election runs through Wisconsin Juan Williams: Breaking down the debates MORE (Wis.) and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell Addison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellObama calls on Senate not to fill Ginsburg's vacancy until after election Planned Parenthood: 'The fate of our rights' depends on Ginsburg replacement Progressive group to spend M in ad campaign on Supreme Court vacancy MORE (Ky.), who wanted a longer-term deal, kicking the next likely debt-ceiling increase beyond the midterm elections in November 2018.

Why did Trump do it?

People in his orbit say that the president was demonstrating to GOP leaders that they do not have the whip hand — and that, if they repeatedly fail to move his agenda, the commander in chief is willing to look elsewhere.

“I think it’s a warning shot,” said Barry Bennett, who was a senior adviser to Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign. “If the Republicans can’t come together as a majority to do something, the president knows where to get more votes.”

Separately, a GOP strategist with ties to the White House said that the president was "triangulating." Trump's overall aim, this source said, was "to show voters that [Congressional Republicans] are the real problem with Washington and that progress can be made if the will is there."

Beyond the ranks of Trump loyalists, however, the dominant reaction was one of perplexity.

“I find it very difficult to understand,” said Doug Heye, a former communications director for the Republican National Committee. “Clearly a long-term Republican majority and the long-term health of the Republican Party are not priorities for Donald Trump.”

Jim Manley, a Democratic strategist and former aide to ex-Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid Harry Mason ReidSenate Republicans signal openness to working with Biden Mellman: The likely voter sham Bottom line MORE (D-Nev.), pronounced himself “absolutely mystified.”

Manley added: “One of the things it shows me is that [Trump] just doesn’t care or understand how the Hill operates. There is nothing the Republican leadership hates more than rounding up votes for the debt limit. And he has now forced them to take votes twice on it.”

The move is a particular embarrassment for Ryan. On Wednesday morning, the Speaker had dismissed the parameters of the Democratic proposal as “ridiculous” and “disgraceful,” only to see the president endorse them a few hours later.

Ryan had no immediate public comment on the deal.

But other Republicans were not so reticent.

“The Pelosi-Schumer-Trump deal is bad,” read a tweet from the account of Sen. Ben Sasse Benjamin (Ben) Eric SasseChamber of Commerce endorses McSally for reelection Ben Sasse is mistaken with idea for the election of senators in America Big Ten football to return in October MORE (R-Neb.).

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch Orrin Grant HatchBottom line Bottom line Senate GOP divided over whether they'd fill Supreme Court vacancy MORE (R-Utah) said he was “not supremely happy,” adding, “I just think it could be a much better deal than it is. And I think they need more time.”

A showdown late in the year is widely seen as giving the Democrats more leverage to extract concessions in return for votes to hike the debt ceiling.

Trump may see an allure in the idea of doing a major deal in December, when lawmakers are eager to leave for the holidays and the prospect of a government shutdown seems especially grim.

Hypothetically, such a deal could also encompass issues like a legislative fix for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) immigration program and perhaps funding for the southern border wall that Trump repeatedly promised during his election campaign.

“We’ve all known that Trump and Schumer are deal-makers. The president saw an opportunity to make a deal,” said Charlie Black, a veteran Republican strategist. Black added, “It would have been better to have consulted with the Speaker.”

Trump’s startling decision will spark a whole new round of speculation about his relationship with Republican leaders in Congress.

The relationship was already fraught.

Aides close to Trump first blamed Ryan, and later McConnell, for the ignominious failure to pass legislation repealing the Affordable Care Act, also known as ObamaCare.

The Republican Congress has remarkably little to show for its first eight months in full control of Washington. And Trump and McConnell reportedly stopped speaking for several weeks after the health care repeal effort foundered.

At the White House media briefing on Tuesday, press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders spoke in blunt and impatient terms about Congress, as she suggested it needed to pass some form of legislation to address the fate of around 800,000 DACA recipients.

“I don’t think the American people elected Congress to do things that were easy,” Sanders said. They have a job to do, she added, “and if they can’t do it, then they need to get out of the way and let somebody else who can take on a heavy lift and get things accomplished.”

Heye said that Trump’s shock deal the next day ought to be seen against that backdrop.

Sanders “made it very clear that a Republican-controlled Congress is not necessarily this administration’s priority,” he said. “So seeing them negotiating out from under House Republicans is distressing — but it can’t be totally surprising.”

The administration offered a very different explanation.

Marc Short, the White House director of legislative affairs, told reporters on board Air Force One Wednesday that the deal will help “to clear the decks” this month and that it “enables us to focus on tax reform” — the president’s other major legislative priority.

Trump praised Pelosi and Schumer during the same flight, calling the deal “very good” and his meeting with them “very, very cordial.” He did not mention Ryan or McConnell, who were also present.

Could the president be turning away from his own party and positioning himself as a pragmatist willing to deal with his opponents? Yes.

But it is tough to find anyone who believes there would be a large political dividend to be reaped by such a gambit, given the intensity of opposition to Trump among left-of-center voters and his apparent reliance on a fervently conservative base.

The most common explanation as the deal reverberated through Washington was also the simplest: that Trump was being Trump, as unpredictable and turbulent as ever.

Black, asked if the deal was an error on Trump’s part, replied, “I wouldn’t characterize it as a mistake.”

“People need to understand that this is not a two-party system anymore” he added. “You have a president in one place, and two parties in their respective places.”

The Memo is a reported column by Niall Stanage, primarily focused on Donald Trump’s presidency.