It’s time once again to do what we like to call Bracketology, college hockey style.

It’s our weekly look at how I believe the NCAA tournament might look like come selection time, using what we know now.

It’s a look into the possible thought processes behind selecting and seeding the NCAA tournament teams.

This is not a be-all, end-all analysis of the bracket. I am trying to give you, the reader, an idea of what the committee might be thinking and not exactly what they are thinking.

We’ll be bringing you a new one every week until we make our final picks before the field is announced on the evening of March 24.

If you want to skip the inner workings and get to the results of the analysis, then click here.

Here are the facts:

• Sixteen teams are selected to participate in the national tournament.

• There are four regional sites (East – Providence, R.I.(March 30-31); Northeast – Manchester, N.H.(March 29-30); Midwest – Allentown, Pa.(March 30-31); West – Fargo, N.D.(March 29-30).

• A host institution that is invited to the tournament plays in the regional for which it is the host and cannot be moved. The host institutions this year: Brown in Providence, University of New Hampshire in Manchester, Penn State in Allentown and North Dakota in Fargo.

• Seedings will not be switched. To avoid undesirable first-round matchups, including intra-conference games (see below), teams will be moved among regionals, not reseeded.

Here are the NCAA’s guidelines on the matter, from the 2019 pre-championship manual:

In setting up the tournament, the committee begins with a list of priorities to ensure a successful tournament on all fronts, including competitive equity, financial success and the likelihood of a playoff-type atmosphere at each regional site. For this model, the following is a basic set of priorities: 1. Once the six automatic qualifiers and 10 at-large teams are selected, the next step is to develop four groups from the committee’s rankings of 1-16. The top four teams are No. 1 seeds and will be placed in the bracket so that if all four teams advance to the Men’s Frozen Four, the No. 1 seed will play the No. 4 seed and the No. 2 seed will play the No. 3 seed in the semifinals. The next four are targeted as No. 2 seeds. The next four are No. 3 seeds and the last four are No. 4 seeds. 2. Step two is to place the home teams. Host institutions that qualify will be placed at home. 3. Step three is to fill in the bracket so that first-round conference matchups are avoided, unless it corrupts the integrity of the bracket. If five or more teams from one conference are selected to the championship, then the integrity of the bracket will be protected (i.e., maintaining the pairing process according to seed will take priority over avoidance of first-round conference matchups). To complete each regional, the committee assigns one team from each of the remaining seeded groups so there is a No. 1, No. 2, No. 3 and No. 4 seed at each regional site.

Given these facts, here is the top 16 of the current PairWise Rankings (PWR), and the conference leaders through all games of February 26:

1t St. Cloud State

1t Massachusetts

3 Minnesota Duluth

4 Denver

5 Minnesota State

6 Quinnipiac

7 Ohio State

8 Arizona State

9t Providence

9t Northeastern

11 Western Michigan

12t Clarkson

12t Cornell

14 Harvard

15 Bowling Green

16 UMass Lowell

33 American International

Current conference leaders based on winning percentage BOLDED Above:

Atlantic Hockey: American International

Big Ten: Ohio State

ECAC Hockey: Cornell

Hockey East: Massachusetts

NCHC: St. Cloud State

WCHA: Minnesota State

Notes

• Bracketology assumes that the season has ended and there are no more games to be played — i.e., the NCAA tournament starts tomorrow.

• Because there are an uneven amount of games played inside each conference, I will be using winning percentage, not points accumulated, to determine the current leader in each conference. This team is my assumed conference tournament champion after applying the tiebreakers.

Step one

From the committee’s report, choose the 16 teams in the tournament.

We break ties in the PWR by looking at the individual comparisons among the tied teams, and add in any current league leaders that are not currently in the top 16. The only teams that is not is American International.

From there, we can start looking at the ties and bubbles in a more detailed fashion.

The ties and bubbles consist of St. Cloud State and Massachusetts at 1, Providence and Northeastern at 9, and Clarkson and Cornell at 12.

We break all of our ties based upon the RPI.

Therefore, the 16 teams in the tournament, in rank order, are:

1 St. Cloud State

2 Massachusetts

3 Minnesota Duluth

4 Denver

5 Minnesota State

6 Quinnipiac

7 Ohio State

8 Arizona State

9 Providence

10 Northeastern

11 Western Michigan

12 Clarkson

13 Cornell

14 Harvard

15 Bowling Green

16 American International

Step two

Now it’s time to assign the seeds.

No. 1 seeds: St. Cloud State, Massachusetts, Minnesota Duluth, Denver

No. 2 seeds: Minnesota State, Quinnipiac, Ohio State, Arizona State

No. 3 seeds: Providence, Northeastern, Western Michigan, Clarkson

No. 4 seeds: Cornell, Harvard, Bowling Green, American International

Step three

Place the No. 1 seeds in regionals.

No. 1 St. Cloud State is place in Fargo

No. 2 Massachusetts is placed in Manchester

No. 3 Minnesota Duluth is placed in Allentown

No. 4 Denver is placed in Providence

This has been done based on distance – nothing else. Minnesota Duluth is closer to Allentown than Providence.

Step four

Now we place the other 12 teams so as to avoid intra-conference matchups if possible.

Begin by filling in each bracket by banding groups. Remember that teams are not assigned to the regional closest to their campus sites by ranking order within the banding (unless you are a host school, in which case you must be assigned to your home regional).

If this is the case, as it was last year, then the committee should seed so that the quarterfinals are seeded such that the four regional championships would be played by No. 1 vs. No. 8, No. 2 vs. No. 7, No. 3 vs. No. 6 and No. 4 vs. No. 5.

So therefore:

No. 2 seeds

No. 8 Arizona State is placed in No. 1 St. Cloud’s regional, the West Regional

No. 7 Ohio State is placed in No. 2 Massachusetts’ regional, the Northeast Regional

No. 6 Quinnipiac is placed in No. 3 Minnesota Duluth’s regional, the Midwest Regional

No. 5 Minnesota State is placed in No. 4 Denver’s regional, the East Regional

No. 3 seeds

Our bracketing system has one regional containing seeds 1, 8, 9, and 16; another with 2, 7, 10 and 15; another with 3, 6, 11 and 14; and another with 4, 5, 12 and 13.

No. 9 Providence is placed in No. 8 Arizona State’s regional, the West Regional

No. 10 Northeastern is placed in No. 7 Ohio State’s regional, the Northeast Regional

No. 11 Western Michigan is placed in No. 6 Quinnipiac’s regional, the Midwest Regional

No. 12 Clarkson is placed in No. 5 Minnesota State’s regional, the East Regional

No. 4 seeds

One more time, taking No. 16 vs. No. 1, No. 15 vs. No. 2, etc.

No. 16 American International travels to No. 1 St. Cloud State’s regional, the West Regional

No. 15 Bowling Green travels to No. 2 Massachusetts’ regional, the Northeast Regional

No. 14 Harvard travels to No. 3 Minnesota Duluth’s regional, the Midwest Regional

No. 13 Cornell travels to No. 4 Denver’s regional, the East Regional

The brackets as we have set them up:

West Regional (Fargo):

16 American International vs. 1 St. Cloud State

9 Providence vs. 8 Arizona State

Midwest Regional (Allentown):

14 Harvard vs. 3 Minnesota Duluth

11 Western Michigan vs. 6 Quinnipiac

East Regional (Providence):

13 Cornell vs. 4 Denver

12 Clarkson vs. 5 Minnesota State

Northeast Regional (Manchester):

15 Bowling Green vs. 2 Massachusetts

10 Northeastern vs. 7 Ohio State

Our first concern is avoiding intraconference matchups. We have none.

Now we have to look at attendance and proximity of schools to regionals.

Let’s focus on proximity to regionals this week. Remember, the NCAA likes to create atmosphere by placing teams as close as they can to their fan bases. So let’s try to do that as much as possible.

Let’s look at the second band at the moment. I see some obvious things here – Minnesota State to Fargo, Ohio State to Allentown and Quinnipiac to Providence.

Let’s make all those swaps.

West Regional (Fargo):

16 American International vs. 1 St. Cloud State

9 Providence vs. 5 Minnesota State

Midwest Regional (Allentown):

14 Harvard vs. 3 Minnesota Duluth

11 Western Michigan vs. 7 Ohio State

East Regional (Providence):

13 Cornell vs. 4 Denver

12 Clarkson vs. 6 Quinnipiac

Northeast Regional (Manchester):

15 Bowling Green vs. 2 Massachusetts

10 Northeastern vs. 8 Arizona State

Now, let’s look at the third band.

Providence to Providence. I will continue to say that the committee will do this because it’s been done before.

Clarkson to Allentown in this case, meaning Western Michigan moves to Fargo.

West Regional (Fargo):

16 American International vs. 1 St. Cloud State

11 Western Michigan vs. 5 Minnesota State

Midwest Regional (Allentown):

14 Harvard vs. 3 Minnesota Duluth

12 Clarkson vs. 7 Ohio State

East Regional (Providence):

13 Cornell vs. 4 Denver

9 Providence vs. 6 Quinnipiac

Northeast Regional (Manchester):

15 Bowling Green vs. 2 Massachusetts

10 Northeastern vs. 8 Arizona State

Now the fourth band. Bowling Green to Allentown and Harvard to Manchester.

West Regional (Fargo):

16 American International vs. 1 St. Cloud State

11 Western Michigan vs. 5 Minnesota State

Midwest Regional (Allentown):

15 Bowling Green vs. 3 Minnesota Duluth

12 Clarkson vs. 7 Ohio State

East Regional (Providence):

13 Cornell vs. 4 Denver

9 Providence vs. 6 Quinnipiac

Northeast Regional (Manchester):

14 Harvard vs. 2 Massachusetts

10 Northeastern vs. 8 Arizona State

Let’s take a look at that bracket.

It looks pretty good to be honest with you. Fargo only really has two teams which are close to the location, but that really can’t be helped at the moment.

Everywhere else looks pretty good.

Yes, I’ve thrown bracket integrity out the window here, but, teams are as close to their regionals as I can get them. So if the committee decides to think this way, this would be reasoning.

That’s my bracket for the week based on how I think the committee will think.

See you next week for the next Bracketology.

Here’s a summary of everything that we have covered.

This week’s brackets

West Regional (Fargo):

16 American International vs. 1 St. Cloud State

11 Western Michigan vs. 5 Minnesota State

Midwest Regional (Allentown):

15 Bowling Green vs. 3 Minnesota Duluth

12 Clarkson vs. 7 Ohio State

East Regional (Providence):

13 Cornell vs. 4 Denver

9 Providence vs. 6 Quinnipiac

Northeast Regional (Manchester):

14 Harvard vs. 2 Massachusetts

10 Northeastern vs. 8 Arizona State

Conference breakdowns

ECAC Hockey — 4

NCHC — 4

Hockey East — 3

WCHA – 2

Atlantic Hockey – 1

Big Ten — 1

Independent – 1

Last Week’s Bracket

West Regional (Fargo):

16 American International vs. 1 St. Cloud State

9 Western Michigan vs. 8 Arizona State

Midwest Regional (Allentown):

13 Clarkson vs. 3 Minnesota Duluth

11 Northeastern vs. 7 Ohio State

East Regional (Providence):

14 UMass Lowell vs. 4 Denver

12 Providence vs. 6 Quinnipiac

Northeast Regional (Manchester):

15 Harvard vs. 2 Massachusetts

10 Cornell vs. 5 Minnesota State

Out: UMass Lowell (14)

In: Bowling Green (15)