Claire McCaskill Has Committed Twitter Perjury and Most Likely a Very Serious Violation of the Very Serious Logan Act She makes this claim today: I've been on the Armed Services Com for 10 years.No call or meeting w/Russian ambassador. Ever. Ambassadors call members of Foreign Rel Com. — Claire McCaskill (@clairecmc) March 2, 2017

But several years ago she'd said: But several years ago she'd said: Off to meeting w/Russian Ambassador. Upset about the arbitrary/cruel decision to end all US adoptions,even those in process. — Claire McCaskill (@clairecmc) January 30, 2013

Today calls with British, Russian, and German Ambassadors re: Iran deal. #doingmyhomework — Claire McCaskill (@clairecmc) August 6, 2015

From the From the Free Beacon, which notes: The Washington Post on Monday asked all 26 members of the Senate Armed Services Committee if they had ever met with Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. All 20 lawmakers who responded said they had not met with him. Will the National Laughingstock confess its lie? Will they recuse themselves from further coverage of this issue? Will the National Laughingstock confess its lie? Will they recuse themselves from further coverage of this issue? Should they also be prosecuted under the terms of the LOGAN ACT??!! Should they also be prosecuted under the terms of the??!! People need answers. People need answers. They need to know if their laughingstock is a crook. They need to know if their laughingstock is a crook. Update: Claire McCaskill says there is "no contradiction" between her claims, because all she did was call Russia about the Iran deal. LOGAN ACT. Doesn't really count as a contact. Claire McCaskill says there is "no contradiction" between her claims, because all she did was call Russia about the Iran deal. I mean, that's all. Just a tiny little violation of theDoesn't really count as a contact. As for meeting with Russians, she says there were other people present so that also doesn't count. As for meeting with Russians, she says there were other people present so that also doesn't count. If I were Claire McCaskill's husband, I'd be worried about her tendency to claim that certain liaisons and trysts with shady men "don't count" for one reason or another. If I were Claire McCaskill's husband, I'd be worried about her tendency to claim that certain liaisons and trysts with shady men "don't count" for one reason or another. Posted by: Ace at 12:07 PM











MuNuvians MeeNuvians Polls! Polls! Polls! Frequently Asked Questions The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick Top Top Tens Greatest Hitjobs News/Chat