UPDATE

A few comments wondering if my benchmark at the bottom was flawed - after introducing a lot of randomness (to prevent the JIT from optimising too much stuff), I still get similar results so I tend to think it is ok.

In the meantime, I have come across this presentation by the lambda implementation team. Page 16 shows some performance figures: inner classes and closures have similar performance / non-capturing lambda are up to 5x times faster.

And @StuartMarks posted this JVMLS 2013 talk from Sergey Kuksenko on lambda performance. The bottom line is that post JIT compilation, lambdas and anonymous classes perform similarly on current Hostpot JVM implementations.

YOUR BENCHMARK

I have also run your test, as you posted it. The problem is that it runs for as little as 20 ms for the first method and 2 ms for the second. Although that is a 10:1 ratio, it is in no way representative because the measurement time is way too small.

I have then taken modified your test to allow for more JIT warmup and I get similar results as with jmh (i.e. no difference between anonymous class and lambda).

public class Main { static interface ICallback { void payload(); } static void measureAnonymousClass() { final int arr[] = {0}; ICallback clb = new ICallback() { @Override public void payload() { arr[0]++; } }; clb.payload(); } static void measureLambda() { final int arr[] = {0}; ICallback clb = () -> { arr[0]++; }; clb.payload(); } static void runTimed(String message, Runnable act) { long start = System.nanoTime(); for (int i = 0; i < 10_000_000; i++) { act.run(); } long end = System.nanoTime(); System.out.println(message + ":" + (end - start)); } public static void main(String[] args) { runTimed("as lambdas", Main::measureLambda); runTimed("anonymous class", Main::measureAnonymousClass); runTimed("as lambdas", Main::measureLambda); runTimed("anonymous class", Main::measureAnonymousClass); runTimed("as lambdas", Main::measureLambda); runTimed("anonymous class", Main::measureAnonymousClass); runTimed("as lambdas", Main::measureLambda); runTimed("anonymous class", Main::measureAnonymousClass); } }

The last run takes about 28 seconds for both methods.

JMH MICRO BENCHMARK

I have run the same test with jmh and the bottom line is that the four methods take as much time as the equivalent:

void baseline() { arr[0]++; }

In other words, the JIT inlines both the anonymous class and the lambda and they take exactly the same time.

Results summary: