GURUGRAM: Various conflicting orders of Gurugram collectors and “special interest” shown by the Haryana government on the pleas of builders regarding the ownership right of 464 acres of land worth Rs 3,000 crores in Gwalpahari area in the district have hinted at another land related controversy in which some VVIPs and a large number of builders are believed to have been benefited.Located in the foothills of Aravali range, the disputed land of Gwalpahari shares its borders with New Delhi and Faridabad and is in possession of several developers, realtors and VIPs including retired judges, former Union ministers, who own farmhouses in the area. Municipal Corporation, Gurgaon (MCG), had become the owner of the land after the village came under its jurisdiction in March 2010.Complexity of the dispute could be gauged from the fact that even the Haryana chief minister, Maohar Lal Khattar had accepted that issue dates back even before the partition of the country."This issue also being very complicated, either the experts could resolve it or it could be forwarded to the Supreme Court of India", Khattar had responded on query regarding solution.The three-decade old dispute is over the ownership of Shamilat Deh (village common land) on which landowners of the village had been demanding ownership title on a pro-rata basis since 1980. One order passed by the then Gurugram collector in 1989 allowed the plea, which was subsequently overturned in appeal. However, after several rounds of litigation, Punjab and Haryana high court in February 2010 restituted the case back to 1989 and ordered the collector to decide the mutation afresh.The problem had aggravated after residents entered into an agreement with various realtors colonizers for sale of land because of realty boom in the area despite settlement of the land ownership dispute. The controversies regarding mutation of various land deals related to the land has led to multiple litigation in various courts.Investigations revealed that the MCG had not challenged the order of then financial commissioner (FC) Y S Malik during his short tenure ­­ from August 1 to September 18, 2014. Malik had upheld ownership of private persons against the interests of MCG.Documents further revealed how then Gurugram collector T L Satyapraksh, who had once upheld his predecessor Shekhar Vidyarthi 's orders, passed on October 17, 2014 holding that land vests with gram Panchayat/MCG, 2014, now cancelled the mutation of land in favour of MCG after hearing an application filed by the same applicant (Metro Valley Business Park Ltd). Satyaprakash passed the orders on January 2, 2017 after after receiving reference from the “chief secretary” and the “chief minister”. MCG, however, has now filed an appeal against these orders.Responding to TOI queries on the entire controversy, MCG commissioner V Umashankar said he was aware about the entire issue and working in the best interest of MCG to protect the title of the land.He further stated that there was no need to challenge Malik's order because he had highlighted some procedural infirmities and fault of revenue officials in the previous mutation (3110) regarding MCG's ownership.“Challenging Malik's order would further complicate the issue. Now we have new mutation (3249) in our favour and would defend our ownership. For me, the ownership right of MCG is more important and mutation is secondary issue. I'm doing my best to protect this land, which belongs to MCG,“ Umashankar added.