Transit Pattern and

Speculation about Model for KIC846 Dust Cloud Geometry

(not Physical Mechanism Model)

now

Kepler data (upper panel, as re-analyzed by Montet & Simon, 2016) and

HAO data vs. Kepler Day# (lower panel). A model for long-term normalized flux that is inspired by the Kepler data has been created to fit the HAO data. The U-shaped "fade" that fits HAO data appears 1600 days later than the U-shaped fade feature that fits Kepler data. The model also includes a linear trend between the U-shaped fades (1600 days apart). The U-shape is asymmetric, meaning that ingress occurs slowly and egress occurs rapidly (with "cosine((t-to)/tau)^0.4" shapes for each half). The current U-shaped fade has a minimum brightness on 2017.07.06; ingress is at 2016.11.08 and egress is at 2017.11.09. The OOT brightness is now approximately half way to a full recovery, according to this mathematical model.







HAO g'-magnitude (and V-mag's converted to g'-mag scale) for the last 1000-day.

Last July someone e-mailed me a prediction of a brightening after the series of 2017 dips was over, and mentioned late September or October for when this should occur. In August he revised the prediction to a brightening in October. At the time I didn't understand why he was predicting this, but in September we began to collaborate on a joining of my HAO observations with his modeling (he has developed a 2-D transit model for complicated ring systems, comas and dust clouds that appears to be more sophisticated than anything published). I now understand why he was predicting a brightening, and since it is underway we want to "go public" with this prediction.I want to present an overview of what we know about the brightness behavior of KIC 8462852 (hereafter, KIC846). Two very basic observational facts should be beyond dispute by now:1) U-shaped fade events of ~ 1 or 2 %, lasting about a year, occur at 1600-day intervals, and2) Near the end of the U-shaped fade event a half dozen short-term dips occur.If anyone questions the above two "observational facts" I would like to get an e-mail with the argument (no opinions, please) for disputing them. As one professional astronomer likes to say: "Mysterious objects usually can't be understood until they exhibit periodicity of some sort." Well, the above two "observational facts" provide a periodicity of sorts! I view them as a good "starting place" for developing new understandings, as I present the following (self-evident) surmises:3) Something orbits KIC846 with a period of ~ 1600 days (ie., at an average distance of 3.0 AU).4) Things orbit the above object, and their dust produces the short-term dips. The object being orbited must be a "massive object."Why? Because a set of objects can't be in an identical orbit this close to each other; only the 5 Lagrange regions permit stability in orbits with the same period.5) The things that orbit the 1600-day "massive object" have orbits that extend on each side by "an orbit circumference fractional amount" = (400 days / 2) / 1600 days = ~ 1/16.Note: 400 days is the length of the "1-year fade feature" (which is actually closer to 1.2 years).6) Assuming the objects that orbit the "massive object" are within the massive object's Hill sphere, the massive object must have a mass of > 14 × M_Jupiter.Note: Anything more massive than ~ 13 × M_Jupiter is a candidate for being a brown dwarf (BD); hereafter I'll refer to the "massive object" as a BD.7) The dips are produced by dust (that could be configured as a tail, a coma or a ring system) that originates from moon-size objects orbiting either the BD or planets that orbit the BD.Why moons? Because the "gravity well" for the BD, or any orbiting planets, will be too deep! Comets produce dust tails because their gravity wells are shallow.Again, if anyone questions the above 5 points, I would like to hear from you with your argument (no opinions, please).Let's review some of the photometric evidence for everything that forces us to the Fact#1 and Fact #2 starting points. (A fuller development of all of the above will be treated in a manuscript, in preparation, that I'm working on with two other authors - one of whom is the person who e-mailed me in July and September predicting a brightening in September or October). By the way, if anyone is aware of a professional astronomer predicting a brightening (and making that prediction before it began) I would really appreciate hearing about that.Figure 1.1 shows how my collaborators view what thelight curve would have looked like ifobservations had continued beyondday 1590. Let's refer to the 2 % fade (starting at "B" in Fig. 1.1 and ending at "D") as a "U-Shaped Fade Feature," or "drop" for short. We suggest that the beginning of the "drop" repeated ~ 11 months ago (2016.11.08). Similarly, we suspect that the group of dips ("C" in Fig. 1.1) repeated this year, during May to October. If so, then a brightening should follow this year's group of dips, and it should start October 2017.The interval between the median activity level ofshort-term dips and this years dip activity is 1584 ± 44 days (as I described a few days ago on this web page). My collaborator (he is "shy" and he doesn't want me to use his name until receiving a positive review of his work) has developed a model for simulating the transit of complicated ring structures (many rings, each with their own opacity), comas and dust clouds. He has applied this model to a configuration consisting of a brown dwarf (BD) in a 1600-day eccentric orbit. The BD has a ring system, and in addition at least 3 planets (with moons) in orbit about it (within the BD's Hill sphere). Every time the BD and its planets orbit close to KIC846 (periapsis is shortly after "C" in Fig. 1.1), volatiles and dust are released, just like what happens to comets in our solar system (note: this idea is consistent with the KIC846'"snow line"). The BD planets have moons, and they are the source for the release of volatiles and dust (note: the moons have a lower escape speed than the planets they orbit, so volatile-driven dust is able to escape the moons but not the planets).Figure 1.2 is the eccentric 1600-day orbit that my colleague has developed to account for these events (as well as others), to be described in a forthcoming paper. It's my view that the BD has a planet and ring system that is the source for dust that escapes the BD Hill sphere to produce a dust cloud that is responsible for the 1 or 2 % fade every 1600-day orbit. The cloud is kept from continually expanding due to light pressure from KIC846. This implies that dust production is continuous. The "drop" events last ~ 1 year, and they are followed by a brightening due to a clean line-of-sight to the star following passage (in addition, there's a component of brightening due to a change in geometry of starlight illumination of the dust cloud and rings).Here's a more accurate depiction of the orbit that we suggest can account for the dip patterns.The above orbit predicts radial velocity vs. date, RV(t), shown in the next figure below.Since the BD is now going away from our solar system the star KIC846 is approaching at close to the maximum speed in its 4.4-year orbit. (Since the KIC846 binary system has an average motion away from our solar system, which is greater than the orbital speed of the KIC846 star, the previous sentence could be modified to say that the KIC846 star is predicted by our model to be receding from our solar system with a minimum speed.)The next figure shows Kepler data (re-analyzed by Montet & Simon, 2016) and HAO measurements of g'-band (and V-band, converted to g'-band) for a 9-year interval. The model trace is a crude representation of an asymmetric U-shaped "fade" with a shape this is approximately compatible with the Kepler observations (assuming their overall pattern repeats every 1600 days). The trace is just a mathematical model; a physical model is now under development for inclusion in a forthcoming paper.In Fig. 1.5 notice that whereas the shape of this year's U-shaped fade is the same as the U-shaped fade that we claim representsdata, the depth and length differ. According to my simple model fit to the current long-term "drop" fade, its length will be ~ 1.0 years, from ingress to egress. The previous event, observed by, lasted at least 1.4 years (observations ended before egress, so we can only speculate on the length of the U-shaped fade). Another difference is depth: the current event has a depth of 1.0 % (from ingress to mid), whereas thedepth was ~ 2.4 %.Here's a "zoom" of the lower panel of the previous figure.We have a draft of a paper that is undergoing "informal" review by a couple experts in the field, and if they endorse submission for publication (subject to the usual suggested changes) we will submit the paper to(we can't afford any journal with page charges)If that journal eventually accepts the paper for publication, after many months of reviewer negotiations, it will appear in the journal sometime next year and at arXiv sometime this year. If MNRAS rejects the paper then it will appear at this web site sometime in November.