1. Lorch, Y. & Kornberg, R. D. Chromatin-remodeling for transcription. Q. Rev. Biophys. 50, e5 (2017).

2. Clapier, C. R., Iwasa, J., Cairns, B. R. & Peterson, C. L. Mechanisms of action and regulation of ATP-dependent chromatin-remodelling complexes. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 407–422 (2017).

3. Cairns, B. R. et al. RSC, an essential, abundant chromatin-remodeling complex. Cell 87, 1249–1260 (1996).

4. Saha, A., Wittmeyer, J. & Cairns, B. R. Chromatin remodeling by RSC involves ATP-dependent DNA translocation. Genes Dev. 16, 2120–2134 (2002).

5. Clapier, C. R. et al. Regulation of DNA translocation efficiency within the chromatin remodeler RSC/Sth1 potentiates nucleosome sliding and ejection. Mol. Cell 62, 453–461 (2016).

6. Krietenstein, N. et al. Genomic nucleosome organization reconstituted with pure proteins. Cell 167, 709–712 (2016).

7. Klein-Brill, A., Joseph-Strauss, D., Appleboim, A. & Friedman, N. Dynamics of chromatin and transcription during transient depletion of the RSC chromatin remodeling complex. Cell Rep. 26, 279–292 (2019).

8. Kubik, S. et al. Nucleosome stability distinguishes two different promoter types at all protein-coding genes in yeast. Mol. Cell 60, 422–434 (2015).

9. Ramachandran, S., Zentner, G. E. & Henikoff, S. Asymmetric nucleosomes flank promoters in the budding yeast genome. Genome Res. 25, 381–390 (2015).

10. Badis, G. et al. A library of yeast transcription factor motifs reveals a widespread function for Rsc3 in targeting nucleosome exclusion at promoters. Mol. Cell 32, 878–887 (2008).

11. Lorch, Y., Maier-Davis, B. & Kornberg, R. D. Role of DNA sequence in chromatin remodeling and the formation of nucleosome-free regions. Genes Dev. 28, 2492–2497 (2014).

12. Kubik, S. et al. Sequence-directed action of RSC remodeler and general regulatory factors modulates +1 nucleosome position to facilitate transcription. Mol Cell 71, 89–102 (2018).

13. Pulice, J. L. & Kadoch, C. Composition and function of mammalian SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complexes in human disease. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 81, 53–60 (2016).

14. Chambers, A. L., Pearl, L. H., Oliver, A. W. & Downs, J. A. The BAH domain of Rsc2 is a histone H3 binding domain. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 9168–9182 (2013).

15. Kasten, M. et al. Tandem bromodomains in the chromatin remodeler RSC recognize acetylated histone H3 Lys14. EMBO J. 23, 1348–1359 (2004).

16. VanDemark, A. P. et al. Autoregulation of the Rsc4 tandem bromodomain by Gcn5 acetylation. Mol. Cell 27, 817–828 (2007).

17. Li, M. et al. Mechanism of DNA translocation underlying chromatin remodelling by Snf2. Nature 567, 409–413 (2019).

18. Saha, A., Wittmeyer, J. & Cairns, B. R. Chromatin remodeling through directional DNA translocation from an internal nucleosomal site. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 747–755 (2005).

19. Schubert, H. L. et al. Structure of an actin-related subcomplex of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeler. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 3345–3350 (2013).

20. Szerlong, H. et al. The HSA domain binds nuclear actin-related proteins to regulate chromatin-remodeling ATPases. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15, 469–476 (2008).

21. Sen, P. et al. The SnAC domain of SWI/SNF is a histone anchor required for remodeling. Mol. Cell. Biol. 33, 360–370 (2013).

22. Lorch, Y., Maier-Davis, B. & Kornberg, R. D. Histone acetylation inhibits RSC and stabilizes the +1 nucleosome. Mol. Cell. 72, 594–600 (2018).

23. Cakiroglu, A. et al. Genome-wide reconstitution of chromatin transactions reveals that RSC preferentially disrupts H2AZ-containing nucleosomes. Genome Res. 29, 988–998 (2019).

24. Suto, R. K., Clarkson, M. J., Tremethick, D. J. & Luger, K. Crystal structure of a nucleosome core particle containing the variant histone H2A.Z. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7, 1121–1124 (2000).

25. Materne, P. et al. Histone H2B ubiquitylation represses gametogenesis by opposing RSC-dependent chromatin remodeling at the ste11 master regulator locus. eLife 5, e13500 (2016).

26. Brahma, S. & Henikoff, S. RSC-associated subnucleosomes define MNase-sensitive promoters in yeast. Mol. Cell 73, 238–249 (2019).

27. Brogaard, K., Xi, L., Wang, J. P. & Widom, J. A map of nucleosome positions in yeast at base-pair resolution. Nature 486, 496–501 (2012).

28. Dechassa, M. L. et al. SWI/SNF has intrinsic nucleosome disassembly activity that is dependent on adjacent nucleosomes. Mol. Cell 38, 590–602 (2010).

29. Patel, A. B. et al. Architecture of the chromatin remodeler RSC and insights into its nucleosome engagement. eLife 8, e54449 (2019).

30. Ye, Y. et al. Structure of the RSC complex bound to the nucleosome. Science 366, 838–843 (2019).

31. Han, Y., Reyes, A. A., Malik, S. & He, Y. Cryo-electron microscopy structure of a nucleosome-bound SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex. Preprint at https://www.bioRxiv.org/content/10.1101/805184v1 (2019).

32. Cairns, B. R. et al. Two functionally distinct forms of the RSC nucleosome-remodeling complex, containing essential AT hook, BAH, and bromodomains. Mol. Cell 4, 715–723 (1999).

33. Rigaut, G. et al. A generic protein purification method for protein complex characterization and proteome exploration. Nat. Biotechnol. 17, 1030–1032 (1999).

34. Lorch, Y. & Kornberg, R. D. Isolation and assay of the RSC chromatin-remodeling complex from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Enzymol. 377, 316–322 (2003).

35. Luger, K., Rechsteiner, T. J. & Richmond, T. J. Expression and purification of recombinant histones and nucleosome reconstitution. Methods Mol. Biol. 119, 1–16 (1999).

36. Dyer, P. N. et al. Reconstitution of nucleosome core particles from recombinant histones and DNA. Methods Enzymol. 375, 23–44 (2003).

37. Maskell, D. P. et al. Structural basis for retroviral integration into nucleosomes. Nature 523, 366–369 (2015).

38. Lowary, P. T. & Widom, J. New DNA sequence rules for high affinity binding to histone octamer and sequence-directed nucleosome positioning. J. Mol. Biol. 276, 19–42 (1998).

39. Kastner, B. et al. GraFix: sample preparation for single-particle electron cryomicroscopy. Nat. Methods 5, 53–55 (2008).

40. Stark, H. GraFix: stabilization of fragile macromolecular complexes for single particle cryo-EM. Methods Enzymol. 481, 109–126 (2010).

41. Tegunov, D. & Cramer, P. Real-time cryo-EM data pre-processing with Warp. Nat. Methods 16, 1146–1152 (2019).

42. Zivanov, J. et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. eLife 7, e42166 (2018).

43. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera–a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).

44. Asturias, F. J., Chung, W. H., Kornberg, R. D. & Lorch, Y. Structural analysis of the RSC chromatin-remodeling complex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 13477–13480 (2002).

45. Chaban, Y. et al. Structure of a RSC-nucleosome complex and insights into chromatin remodeling. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15, 1272–1277 (2008).

46. Leschziner, A. E. et al. Conformational flexibility in the chromatin remodeler RSC observed by electron microscopy and the orthogonal tilt reconstruction method. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 4913–4918 (2007).

47. Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 486–501 (2010).

48. Kidmose, R. T. et al. Namdinator—automatic molecular dynamics flexible fitting of structural models into cryo-EM and crystallography experimental maps. IUCrJ 6, 526–531 (2019).

49. Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 213–221 (2010).

50. Song, Y. et al. High-resolution comparative modeling with RosettaCM. Structure 21, 1735–1742 (2013).

51. Raman, S. et al. Structure prediction for CASP8 with all-atom refinement using Rosetta. Proteins 77 (Suppl 9), 89–99 (2009).

52. van Dijk, M. & Bonvin, A. M. 3D-DART: a DNA structure modelling server. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, W235–W239 (2009).

53. Waterhouse, A. et al. SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, W296–W303 (2018).

54. Bienert, S. et al. The SWISS-MODEL repository-new features and functionality. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D313–D319 (2017).

55. Charlop-Powers, Z., Zeng, L., Zhang, Q. & Zhou, M. M. Structural insights into selective histone H3 recognition by the human Polybromo bromodomain 2. Cell Res. 20, 529–538 (2010).

56. Da, G. et al. Structure and function of the SWIRM domain, a conserved protein module found in chromatin regulatory complexes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 2057–2062 (2006).

57. Legge, G. B. et al. ZZ domain of CBP: an unusual zinc finger fold in a protein interaction module. J. Mol. Biol. 343, 1081–1093 (2004).

58. Reichen, C. et al. Structures of designed armadillo-repeat proteins show propagation of inter-repeat interface effects. Acta Crystallogr. D 72, 168–175 (2016).

59. Grimm, M., Zimniak, T., Kahraman, A. & Herzog, F. xVis: a web server for the schematic visualization and interpretation of crosslink-derived spatial restraints. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, W362–W369 (2015).

60. Zimmermann, L. et al. A completely reimplemented mpi bioinformatics toolkit with a new HHpred server at its core. J. Mol. Biol. 430, 2237–2243 (2018).

61. Buchan, D. W. A. & Jones, D. T. The PSIPRED protein analysis workbench: 20 years on. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, W402–W407 (2019).

62. Jones, D. T. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J. Mol. Biol. 292, 195–202 (1999).

63. Williams, C. J. et al. MolProbity: More and better reference data for improved all-atom structure validation. Protein Sci. 27, 293–315 (2018).

64. Schrodinger, LLC. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System version 1.8 (2015).

65. Goddard, T. D. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: Meeting modern challenges in visualization and analysis. Protein Sci. 27, 14–25 (2018).

66. Treich, I., Ho, L. & Carlson, M. Direct interaction between Rsc6 and Rsc8/Swh3,two proteins that are conserved in SWI/SNF-related complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 3739–3745 (1998).

67. Taneda, T. & Kikuchi, A. Genetic analysis of RSC58, which encodes a component of a yeast chromatin remodeling complex, and interacts with the transcription factor Swi6. Mol. Genet. Genomics 271, 479–489 (2004).

68. Angus-Hill, M. L. et al. A Rsc3/Rsc30 zinc cluster dimer reveals novel roles for the chromatin remodeler RSC in gene expression and cell cycle control. Mol. Cell 7, 741–751 (2001).

69. Cerami, E. et al. The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov. 2, 401–404 (2012).

70. Gao, J. et al. Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci. Signal. 6, pl1 (2013).

71. Liu, Y., Schmidt, B. & Maskell, D. L. MSAProbs: multiple sequence alignment based on pair hidden Markov models and partition function posterior probabilities. Bioinformatics 26, 1958–1964 (2010).

72. Bond, C. S. & Schüttelkopf, A. W. ALINE: a WYSIWYG protein-sequence alignment editor for publication-quality alignments. Acta Crystallogr. D 65, 510–512 (2009).

73. Yang, B. et al. Identification of cross-linked peptides from complex samples. Nat. Methods 9, 904–906 (2012).

74. Combe, C. W., Fischer, L. & Rappsilber, J. xiNET: cross-link network maps with residue resolution. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 14, 1137–1147 (2015).

75. Yan, Z. et al. PBAF chromatin-remodeling complex requires a novel specificity subunit, BAF200, to regulate expression of selective interferon-responsive genes. Genes Dev. 19, 1662–1667 (2005).

76. Xue, Y. et al. The human SWI/SNF-B chromatin-remodeling complex is related to yeast rsc and localizes at kinetochores of mitotic chromosomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 13015–13020 (2000).

77. Nicolas, R. H. & Goodwin, G. H. Molecular cloning of polybromo, a nuclear protein containing multiple domains including five bromodomains, a truncated HMG-box, and two repeats of a novel domain. Gene 175, 233–240 (1996).

78. Wang, W. et al. Architectural DNA binding by a high-mobility-group/kinesin-like subunit in mammalian SWI/SNF-related complexes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 492–498 (1998).

79. Satterwhite, E. et al. The BCL11 gene family: involvement of BCL11A in lymphoid malignancies. Blood 98, 3413–3420 (2001).

80. Sandhya, S., Maulik, A., Giri, M. & Singh, M. Domain architecture of BAF250a reveals the ARID and ARM-repeat domains with implication in function and assembly of the BAF remodeling complex. PLoS One 13, e0205267 (2018).

81. Worden, E. J., Hoffmann, N. A., Hicks, C. W. & Wolberger, C. Mechanism of cross-talk between H2B ubiquitination and H3 methylation by Dot1L. Cell 176, 1490–1501 (2019).

82. Eustermann, S. et al. Structural basis for ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling by the INO80 complex. Nature 556, 386–390 (2018).

83. Farnung, L., Vos, S. M., Wigge, C. & Cramer, P. Nucleosome–Chd1 structure and implications for chromatin remodelling. Nature 550, 539–542 (2017).

84. Willhoft, O. et al. Structure and dynamics of the yeast SWR1-nucleosome complex. Science 362, eaat7716 (2018).

85. Ayala, R. et al. Structure and regulation of the human INO80-nucleosome complex. Nature 556, 391–395 (2018).

86. Sundaramoorthy, R. et al. Structure of the chromatin remodelling enzyme Chd1 bound to a ubiquitinylated nucleosome. eLife 7, e35720 (2018).

87. Yan, L., Wu, H., Li, X., Gao, N. & Chen, Z. Structures of the ISWI-nucleosome complex reveal a conserved mechanism of chromatin remodeling. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 26, 258–266 (2019).