As a self-described Republican dirty trickster, Roger Stone spent decades gleefully and gratuitously inspiring ire among his critics and opponents.

Now the longtime political advisor to President Trump is struggling to stay in the good graces of U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson while awaiting trial in the Russia investigation.



For the record: This article refers to Roger Stone as a “self-described” dirty trickster. Stone has not used those words to describe himself, but has acknowledged that it’s a widely used label that “I’m stuck with.”

He appeared to get a reprieve Thursday when he returned to Jackson’s courtroom for a status conference. There were no fireworks over whether Stone had violated her gag order with the release of his book “The Myth of Russian Collusion.”

Jackson instead set a trial date of Nov. 5. Stone’s legal team will review nine terabytes of potential evidence collected by prosecutors — if printed, enough paper to be stacked twice as high as the Washington Monument, according to one of his lawyers.


Stone faces seven charges involving lying to the House Intelligence Committee about his conversations involving WikiLeaks, the organization that released thousands of hacked Democratic Party emails during the 2016 presidential campaign. He has pleaded not guilty.

Thursday’s hearing occurred as new signs suggested special counsel Robert S. Mueller III was wrapping up his investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential race and whether the Trump campaign cooperated with the Kremlin.

Top prosecutor Andrew Weissmann is leaving the office “in the near future,” spokesman Peter Carr said, following other members of Mueller’s team who recently departed.

Weissmann may return to the New York University School of Law, where he’s taught in the past. “We have been talking with him about returning to the law school following his current commitments,” spokesman Michael Orey said.


If Mueller closes up shop soon, Stone’s trial likely will be handled by the U.S. attorney’s office in Washington, which also has worked on the case.

Stone angered Jackson last month with an inflammatory Instagram post that included a crosshairs symbol next to her head. In response, Jackson tightened an earlier gag order and barred Stone from saying almost anything in public about the case.

He ended up in hot water again because he failed to disclose the imminent publication of the book, an updated version of a political tome released shortly after the election. It includes a new introduction that calls Mueller “crooked.”

An exasperated Jackson demanded more information about the book, and Stone’s lawyers asked her forgiveness in a court filing on Monday.


“Having been scolded, we seek only to defend Mr. Stone and move ahead without further ado,” they wrote.

Jackson has strictly policed gag-order infractions in separate cases involving Paul Manafort and Richard Gates, the chairman and deputy chairman of Trump’s campaign. On Wednesday, she sentenced Manafort, who had pleaded guilty to conspiracy charges, to 3½ additional years in prison, bringing his total sentence to 7½ years.

In their latest court filing, Stone’s lawyers submitted emails about the book, which was originally called “The Making of the President 2016.”

The publisher pitched the idea for an update in December as a way for Stone “to set the record straight, clear his name, reach a wider audience and make some money.”


Stone was underwhelmed, complaining that the original printing didn’t sell well and “never even recaptured the promotional costs.” He added, “I have no confidence I would make a penny.”

Fox News courts advertisers after brands flee Tucker Carlson and Laura Ingraham »

But with the help of his lawyer, Grant Smith, who also represents him in the Russia investigation, Stone negotiated a deal to write a new introduction and reprint the book with a new title.

On Jan. 13, Stone emailed Tony Lyons of Skyhorse Publishing to say he was putting “the final touches” on the introduction and it’s “substantially longer and better than the draft sent to me by your folks.”


Better or not, Stone’s language in the introduction risked violating the judge’s gag order, which was tightened on Feb. 21.

It was only then that Smith began demanding more information about the book’s release to figure out what to tell the judge.

“The mere publication of the new portions of the book could land Roger in jail for contempt of the judge’s order,” Smith wrote to the publisher on Feb. 26. “I need this immediately. This is not some made-up emergency.”

Lyons told him that about 14,000 copies had been shipped across the country and an electronic version had already been made available online “long before the gag order.”


“So we should be good, right?” Lyons wrote in an email.

“Hopefully,” Smith responded.

There was no discussion at Thursday’s hearing about an Instagram post highlighted by prosecutors.

The March 3 post showed a picture of Stone and the question “Who Framed Roger Stone?” — a homage to the popular 1988 live action/animated feature film “Who Framed Roger Rabbit.”


Stone’s gag order allows him to profess his innocence and raise money for his legal defense fund, but he’s otherwise barred from commenting about his case in public.