Pity Jack Lew, President Barack Obama's White House chief of staff, the highest ranking employee inside the executive office of the president of the United States.

The Big Download Whacks Cities read more

Announcements, Events & more from Tyee and select partners John Horton’s Paintings Preserve History. His Seamanship Saves Lives Meet the fascinating Order of BC winner who also happens to be a Tyee supporter.

Earning a paltry $172,200 a year, Lew's salary pales in comparison to George Duncan, the chief administrative officer of -- wait for it -- Richmond, B.C., who pocketed a cool $267,613 in 2010/11 for keeping the lights on in that Lower Mainland suburb.

And Duncan's salary isn't even an anomaly. The chief administrative officers or city managers of cities such as Delta, North Vancouver (City and District), Kelowna, Maple Ridge, West Vancouver, Burnaby, Kamloops, Langley City, Pitt Meadows, White Rock, Surrey, Vancouver and Victoria all earned more than the White House chief of staff last year, according to the Vancouver Sun's Public Sector Salaries database.

In fact, according to the 30 cities covered by the Vancouver Sun's database, 116 municipal employees in B.C. earned more than Obama's chief of staff and 17 of TransLink's top breadwinners pulled in more than poor old Lew as well.

The overall winner of the B.C. City Hall Pay Sweepstakes? Penny Ballem, Vancouver's city manager, who banked a tidy $324,110, nearly double Lew's salary.

Poor Josh, too

And gold-plated municipal salaries aren't just "a big city" phenomenon in B.C.

In the Town of Lillooet, the chief administrative officer is paid $120,316 annually to keep an eye on 2,322 local residents.

Or put another way: it costs each taxpayer in Lillooet roughly $110 to keep their CAO living in comfort, not even taking into account all of the other town employees they must pay for as well.

Now compare that Lillooet salary to Obama's principal deputy press secretary Josh Earnest, described by the Washington Post as a key member of Obama's message team, who makes $123,000 a year at his White House gig and is perpetually a slip of the tongue away from igniting an international incident.

Still keeping Josh Earnest's pay in mind, consider the plight of Victoria's hard hit taxpayers.

In the capital city alone, there are 24 city employees who make more than Obama's deputy press secretary and this in a city where the average wage earner pulls in less than $40,000 per year.

It isn't just the vast discrepancy between White House salaries and the senior managers of local governments in B.C. that should alarm taxpayers, it's also the duplicity that exists at city halls across the province.

Imagine how city residents in Victoria felt when they opened a recent Times Colonist to read that: "City execs' salaries rise by up to 76 per cent since 2007." Reportedly, Victoria's councillors were "shocked" by the news. No kidding.

Victoria's city employees were likely shocked too after reading the news, realizing that they had only recently accepted a two per cent pay hike in each of the next three years.

But at least they can take solace in the fact that in Revelstoke municipal workers received even less, just a 1.25 per cent pay hike in 2010 and 2011.

Shades of Oliver Twist perhaps?

Reconsider spending

With pay rates and hikes such as those given to senior managers at city halls, it's little surprise that the Canadian Federation of Independent Business reported earlier this year that municipal spending in B.C. has jumped to "nearly four times the rate of population growth over the last decade," even after spending was adjusted for inflation.

B.C. ratepayers would have saved over $4 billion if local government spending had simply kept pace with inflation and population growth.

Bottom line though: it's inexcusable for city administrations to tell their unionized workers on the one hand that the cupboard is bare and be happy with a one or two per cent pay hike, while on the other hand rewarding their top guns with increases of 76 per cent over five years as Victoria did with some.

It's also less than honest.