communistroader:

the-transfeminine-mystique:

Like the statement “categorically ruling out the possibility of ever dating a member of a marginalized subgroup of women might mean you have some internalized assumptions about and prejudice against the group” is such an amazingly mundane statement and it’s amazing the amount of malice it takes to interpret it as “transes want to make lesbians fuck them” And it’s another step into the ridiculous when terfs say that it means we want to fuck them, because like it doesn’t have anything to do with terfs. It’s a critique of the way that transmisogyny manifests itself in even those who claim to support us and view us as women. It has nothing to do with people who embrace and externalize that transmisogyny and actively refuse to see us as women. It’s just amazing how pointing out a way in which we get treated as if we’re not real women (in which we don’t even say that people should date trans women, we just ask people to examine the ways in which we’re consciously or subconsciously conflated with men) gets intentionally twisted to claim we’re after sex and not like…. baseline respect and inclusion as women.

Like the statement “ categorically ruling out the possibility of ever dating a member of a marginalized subgroup of women might mean you have some internalized assumptions about and prejudice against the group ” is such an amazingly mundane statement and it’s amazing the amount of malice it takes to interpret it as “transes want to make lesbians fuck them”



*Categorically ruling out the possibility of ever dating a man.

That doesn’t mean you harbour any prejudices against men. No one says straight men hate other men because they only like women. But with lesbians it’s different, because apparently female-exclusive sexual orientations keep entitled, creepy men awake at night.



How much clearer can people get with you, babe? When you say penis-owners can be women, you’re saying lesbianism includes dick. When you say lesbianism includes dick, you accuse lesbians who don’t want dick of being prejudiced. Literally, what you just said - that categorically excluding ‘a marginalised group of women’ aka ‘WOMEN’ WITH DICKS might mean there’s internalised prejudice involved - this is rape rhetoric.

And it’s another step into the ridiculous when terfs say that it means we want to fuck them, because like it doesn’t have anything to do with terfs.



You have a genital preference. Every single one of you ‘transbians’ wants pussy, and you want to feel confident that you can get pussy. That’s why ‘cotton ceiling’ rhetoric exists in the first place. You can’t tolerate the existence of a sexual orientation which excludes your dick.

You are promoting cotton ceiling rhetoric by the way. Which makes you a predator. And a totally ugly, evil human being. Shame on you.

It’s a critique of the way that transmisogyny manifests itself in even those who claim to support us and view us as women. It has nothing to do with people who embrace and externalize that transmisogyny and actively refuse to see us as women.



The women who try to validate your delusion are conceding something they don’t need to.

You’re a man.

When I say you’re a man, I’m not ‘actively refusing’ to do anything, except perhaps enable your delusion. Recognising that biological males are men is literally the default state. It requires no intention on my part.

It’s just amazing how pointing out a way in which we get treated as if we’re not real women (in which we don’t even say that people should date trans women, we just ask people to examine the ways in which we’re consciously or subconsciously conflated with men)



No pressure ladies, we’re not saying you HAVE to fuck us. We’re just saying if you don’t want to fuck us, you have to do soul-searching to figure out why that’s the case. And we’re just telling you exactly where your soul-searching must lead; namely, to a feeling of remorse for not including penis in your dating pool.

Go to hell.