For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.





We’ve done a fair bit of reporting now on the push, in Tennessee and other states, to essentially criminalize certain aspects of the Islamic faith. Two dozen states have now considered proposals to block judges from forcing Islamic Sharia law on God-fearing citizens, but no proposal is more extreme than Tennessee’s. As originally written, the bill classified Islamic law as treasonous, and made material support for Islam (a loosely defined phrasing that could have potentially applied to charitable donations to mosques) a felony.

It’s since been modified, and its supporters say it doesn’t specifically target Islam. Well, except for the parts that do target Islam. Last week, the Tennessean published a few excerpts from a fascinating exchange between Aaron Nuell, a teacher in Murfreesboro, and GOP State Rep. Rick Womick, an avid supporter of the legislation. In an email to Nuell, Womick consistently refers to Muslims as “them,” and openly wonders whether Muslims who opposed the legislation are genuinely opposed to terrorism. I contacted Nuell to see if he could send the full correspondence and he obliged. (Read it below the fold.)

Nuell emailed Womick last Wednesday, after reading a report about the lawmaker’s confrontation with a Muslim-American who had testified against the bill (and whose mosque had been attacked by arsonists three years earlier). Here’s their full exchange (typos, etc. in the original):

Subject: A quick note… Please stop attacking your Muslim constituents. Some live in your district, and you were elected to represent them, too. You don’t get to pick who you represent; in contrast, you chose to represent a diverse community. Your behavior is extreme and your questioning is in bad faith. Mr. Aaron Nuell

Murfreesboro, TN

Womick responded later that night:

Dear Mr. Nuell: I repectfully and politely sat and listened yesterday, to four individuals, one of which was Mr. Abudiab, publicly accuse me and my fellow legislators of denying them their Constitutional rights, infaming intolerance, false accusations, being hate mongerers, being racists, and being white supremicist like that of the KKK. And you write me to scold me because I dare speak up and defend my character and confront a political-militaristic-religion responsible for 10 out of the last 11 terrorist attack on Americans? Attacks that have killed over 3400 U.S. citizens! Well sir, get used to it. My duty is to the citizens of Tennessee and our Constitution. Not to those who want to usurp it and live under Sharia Law. My intent is not to deny any Muslim the freedom to worship; that is their First Amendment right. But I will not cower to their demands to implement Sharia Law over U.S. Constitutional Law. All this legislation does is adopt CUURENT FEDERAL TERRORISM LAWS and allows local and state law enforcement agencies to enforce those federal laws. So if their intent is to live peacfully within our laws, why are they opposed to this legislation? I have been studying Islam for over nine years now. Maybe you should take the time to study Islam and the Law that governs them…Sharia Law…before you turn a blind eye and accuse others of intolerance. Ignorance is bliss, and stupidity can get you killed. I suggest you educate yourself on both sides of the issue. Though we are at opposite ends of the spectrum, I do appreciate and respect your opinion and comment. Thank you for taking the time to contact me. Sincerely,

Rick

And Nuell’s closing shot: