According to official government data from the National Snow & Ice Data Center (NSIDC), Antarctic Sea Ice Extent is currently tracking the 1979-1990 average:







In addition, Jan 2020’s extent exceeded that of 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2011, 2007, 2006, 2005, 2000, 1997, 1993, 1992, 1988, 1985, 1984, 1981, and 1980.

That’s right, Antarctic Sea Ice extent is currently higher NOW than it was in the early 1980s:







NSIDC: “The rate of [seasonal] ice loss slowed considerably over the month of January … extent declined 3.19 million km2, which is slower than the 1981 to 2010 average loss of 3.79 million km2.”





No Correlation between CO2 and Sea Ice Extent

Since 1979 — the year sea ice satellite measurements began — CO2 readings taken at the Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii have been on an unnaturally linear rise. While, during the same period, Antarctic Sea Ice Extent has been “extremely variable” with “the yearly minimum hitting both record highs and lows” — NOAA (climate.gov)…





Antarctica’s “extremely variable” minimum sea ice extent for each year (NOAA: climate.gov)…

…vs CO2 levels at Mauna Loa which show an unnaturally linear rise.



…revealing there is NO correlation between rising ‘Mauna Loa’ CO2 levels and Antarctic Sea Ice Extent, and that climate alarmists are barking up the wrong tree in that regard.





The Mauna Loa (Keeling) CO2 curve may actually be doctored, as “no real-world measurements of a parameter would follow such a clean, simple, and straight trajectory for 60 years” — click below for Ph.D. Ned Nikolov’s take:



And the Sea Ice story is the same in the Arctic, too — with Extent up there once again GROWING:







There is nothing catastrophic, alarming, or even a little worrisome about these datasets — how the western media get away with their constant stream of baseless fear-mongering will forever remain a mystery to me.

The Sun, the clouds, and the oceans are the main players in climate change; and always have been.

Furthermore, higher levels of atmospheric CO2 have only ever been BENEFICIAL to biodiversity on our planet — every life-form is carbon based, after all: carbon is the backbone of every known biological molecule.







Heat should also be welcomed, for life on our planet thrives during periods of warmth, and is stifled during times of cold — serving as evidence for this is that fact that tropical forests cover <12% of all land yet contain the majority of plant and animal species; while the Arctic, which covers 10% of the land, contains just 600 plant species, 100 species of birds, no reptiles or amphibians, and only 20 mammals.

AGW advocates try to circumvent the connection between warm climates and biodiversity by claiming that the secondary effects of global warming, such as droughts or the melting of ice, threaten life — however, droughts are NOT increasing on a planetary scale, and, as highlighted above, the ice is NOT melting.

The alarmist brigade have it entirely backwards…







Our future is actually likely one of ever-descending COLD, in line with historically low solar activity.

Prepare accordingly — learn the facts, relocate if need be, and grown your own.





Social Media channels are restricting Electroverse’s reach — be sure to subscribe to receive new post notifications by email (the box is located in the sidebar >>> or scroll down if on mobile).

And/or become a Patron by clicking here: patreon.com/join/electroverse

The site receives ZERO funding, and never has.

So any way you can, help us spread the message so others can survive and thrive in the coming times.





Grand Solar Minimum + Pole Shift



