Download raw source

Delivered-To: john.podesta@gmail.com Received: by 10.25.43.136 with SMTP id r130csp406081lfr; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 16:30:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.107.12.32 with SMTP id w32mr9114840ioi.23.1440199832307; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 16:30:32 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <tgoff@hillaryclinton.com> Received: from mail-io0-x22e.google.com (mail-io0-x22e.google.com. [2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22e]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g63si2589599ioj.58.2015.08.21.16.30.31 for <john.podesta@gmail.com> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 21 Aug 2015 16:30:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of tgoff@hillaryclinton.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22e as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22e; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of tgoff@hillaryclinton.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22e as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tgoff@hillaryclinton.com; dkim=pass header.i=@hillaryclinton.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=hillaryclinton.com Received: by mail-io0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id b91so97177229iod.1 for <john.podesta@gmail.com>; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 16:30:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hillaryclinton.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=mMoUuU1yyPn001E3MEqzy17HJpyOCkG047iU+i3NToY=; b=HElD/0JR2ax0m0ef6ELWmdFO7K9Y4LONkPieXMWJP/ymiSXbmlFuVY3DDLh07gzwK+ 8z/fSYc9cQySxg1015Pz578oHTiCSC2zqBqAOhMIV7xpaU8x1K3/C6fwmFD/rcueP0cQ uMldBiRYCnxd5gfz849dkIgskBlmAWAMVcZQg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=mMoUuU1yyPn001E3MEqzy17HJpyOCkG047iU+i3NToY=; b=iB8ZnSR36bWqIjxTaivbbU5xuLObDIvUK07OuYd1hRSlMqaP6/2PdPt7QmyPntTDX2 YEgoztcvlF7h9YHQ7BKNDIlXMF3CFw/8nA1nGsMinWa+Idkw5G3firT27Pn3fIl56t/S vvdkbS/g6rSuViDQaUNA3CiNRYc0cNvYCD5Iowu7UnpSYScHur0Ps+CCEWvImRxtH4Gf V9/N2ZsicQrLbK+m9dvi8jcj9stnFv1QEbrwrYDQLHHNDOg6+s4OvCrlCT2X1W0/qCw3 HSCMMKFuTwG5CJCFezPpsyOr6QpWVq7IY1VYnV8w6EeFLhRKM4Hr8TnXixCAMg4PvZhL O2mg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkS1FFOfkjpztLHyeOF3LWJ3zzBsevLndDbm7Vu6myf8poWGH1RBvPZ+t4u7JhAFFoCM2Ct MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.168.40 with SMTP id r40mr9181253ioe.20.1440199831182; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 16:30:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.102.232 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 16:30:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <CAE6FiQ8Tqm9_-KrmbpxMr8DB-kZi+Sz+ht9woa6t2v2co_b1Kg@mail.gmail.com> References: <SNT404-EAS54087BF35E00D0A090754DF650@phx.gbl> <CAE6FiQ8Tqm9_-KrmbpxMr8DB-kZi+Sz+ht9woa6t2v2co_b1Kg@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 19:30:31 -0400 Message-ID: <CADHYb1_xh_xf-XLw8uZZ3QZP_2sdUqdpZNwqtK9x-LAskK5WTw@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Hillary column reaction..... From: Teddy Goff <tgoff@hillaryclinton.com> To: John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com> CC: Robby Mook <re47@hillaryclinton.com>, Dennis Cheng <dcheng@hillaryclinton.com>, Katie Dowd <kdowd@hillaryclinton.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11425c5257e91d051ddaa7c3 --001a11425c5257e91d051ddaa7c3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Ha, we were literally just discussing launching a "fight back fund." Will try it out at some point soon. On Friday, August 21, 2015, John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com> wrote: > Good idea on email solicitation. May want to test. > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: *Brent Budowsky* <brentbbi@webtv.net > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','brentbbi@webtv.net');>> > Date: Friday, August 21, 2015 > Subject: Hillary column reaction..... > To: John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','john.podesta@gmail.com');>> > > > John, common denominator of the grassroots reaction I have gotten to my two > pro-Hillary columns this week for The Hill and The Observer is much higher > than > usual private email reaction from Hillary supporters thanking me for the > column, > almost all of them women. > > It has always concerned me that when I write a column friendly to Bernie I > am inundated with thanks yous from the grassroots, but when I write a > column supporting or defending Hillary I receive some high level thanks but > virtually nothing grassroots. > > This time is different, volume is high, gender breakdown is very heavily > female, hottest > button issue is my criticism of major media's negative attitude towards > Hillary. I > would suggest some kind of small donor HRC moneybomb aimed at women with > a "fight back with a small donation" theme and would predict a heavy and > positive > reaction from female small donors..... > > Sent from my iPad > --001a11425c5257e91d051ddaa7c3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ha, we were literally just discussing launching a "fight back fund.&qu= ot; Will try it out at some point soon.=C2=A0<br><br>On Friday, August 21, = 2015, John Podesta <<a href=3D"mailto:john.podesta@gmail.com">john.podes= ta@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"m= argin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Good idea on = email solicitation. May want to test.<br><br>---------- Forwarded message -= ---------<br>From: <b>Brent Budowsky</b> <<a href=3D"javascript:_e(%7B%7= D,'cvml','brentbbi@webtv.net');" target=3D"_blank">brentbbi= @webtv.net</a>><br>Date: Friday, August 21, 2015<br>Subject: Hillary col= umn reaction.....<br>To: John Podesta <<a href=3D"javascript:_e(%7B%7D,&= #39;cvml','john.podesta@gmail.com');" target=3D"_blank">john.po= desta@gmail.com</a>><br><br><br>John, common denominator of the grassroo= ts reaction I have gotten to my two<br> pro-Hillary columns this week for The Hill and The Observer is much higher = than<br> usual private email reaction from Hillary supporters thanking me for the co= lumn,<br> almost all of them women.<br> <br> It has always concerned me that when I write a column friendly to Bernie I = am inundated with thanks yous from the grassroots, but when I write a colum= n supporting or defending Hillary I receive some high level thanks but virt= ually nothing grassroots.<br> <br> This time is different, volume is high, gender breakdown is very heavily fe= male, hottest<br> button issue is my criticism of major media's negative attitude towards= Hillary.=C2=A0 I<br> would suggest some kind of small donor HRC moneybomb aimed at women with<br= > a "fight back with a small donation" theme and would predict a he= avy and positive<br> reaction from female small donors.....<br> <br> Sent from my iPad<br> </blockquote> --001a11425c5257e91d051ddaa7c3--