The United States managed to remove references to the alarming rate at which Arctic sea ice is being lost from an international declaration, it has been revealed, in one of the first signs that the Trump administration will attempt to water down action on climate change by the rest of the world.

The Arctic Council is an intergovernmental body which represents eight countries with an interest in the region, including the US, Canada, Russia and the Scandinavian states.

Earlier this month it published the ‘Fairbanks Declaration’ which, to the surprise of some, did actually recognise that climate change was happening and twice as fast in the Arctic.

But a draft copy obtained by the Inside Climate News website shows the US suggested a number of last-minute changes which sought to play down global warming and how to reduce it.

While they were not all accepted in their entirety, the US largely got its way.

There is concern that Trump administration will withdraw from the Paris Agreement on climate change.

But it is also thought some US officials believe it is better to remain a signatory in order to have a seat at the table during further international negotiations – possibly to delay, water down or otherwise obstruct progress.

And so evidence of this tactic in the Arctic Council talks, as exposed by Inside Climate News, has caused some alarm.

The biggest US-proposed change saw the mass deletion of comments noting “with concern that the Arctic Ocean could be largely free of summer ice in two decades, that melt processes in the Arctic may have greater impact on global sea level rise than previously estimated, and that changes in the Arctic may be affecting weather in mid-latitudes”.

This was replaced by a bland statement noting “with concern” the findings of an updated assessment of levels of snow, ice and permafrost in the region.

The draft document also talked about “noting the entry into force of the Paris Agreement on climate change for the parties to that Agreement and encouraging its implementation”. But the final version simply noted the Paris Agreement’s implementation.

A commitment to “work towards full implementation” of the United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goals by 2030 was replaced with a line “reaffirming” the goals and “the need for their realisation by 2030”.

The US also asked for “the need to improve the access of Arctic communities to clean, affordable, reliable and renewable energy sources” to be changed to remove the reference to renewables.

This was opposed by other delegates but the final version talks about improving access to “energy sources including renewable energy”.

Another line saying pace of the ongoing warming process in the Arctic would “strongly depend” on greenhouse gas emissions was changed to remove the word “strongly”. And the recognition that climate change was “by far the most serious threat to Arctic biodiversity” was altered to say it was “the most serious threat”.

Jim Gamble, of the Aleut International Association, a permanent participant on the council representing indigenous Arctic people, said the vast majority of people reading the declaration would think it was “pretty good and we agree with that”.

“There's an effort to move the climate agreement and sustainable development goals forward. But for those of us who are involved in the whole negotiation, we know at various times there was stronger language,” he told Inside Climate.

Another council delegate said the US “just dropped a bomb on a multilateral forum at the last minute”.

Bob Ward, policy and communications director at the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, expressed concerns at the US officials’ tactics.

“Some of these changes are reminiscent of the way in which the last Republican administration sought to water down scientific conclusions about climate change,” he told The Independent.

“They are a worrying sign that the US may not just be a laggard in taking domestic action on climate change, but may also seek to undermine concrete international action.

“We saw during the George W Bush presidency that the US attempt to obstruct progress on international climate action, but they were singled out and humiliated for it.”

He said the position taken by the US might also provide cover to other countries, particularly significant fossil fuel producers like Saudi Arabia, to be “equally unreasonable”.

10 photographs to show to anyone who doesn't believe in climate change Show all 10 1 /10 10 photographs to show to anyone who doesn't believe in climate change 10 photographs to show to anyone who doesn't believe in climate change A group of emperor penguins face a crack in the sea ice, near McMurdo Station, Antarctica Kira Morris 10 photographs to show to anyone who doesn't believe in climate change Floods destroyed eight bridges and ruined crops such as wheat, maize and peas in the Karimabad valley in northern Pakistan, a mountainous region with many glaciers. In many parts of the world, glaciers have been in retreat, creating dangerously large lakes that can cause devastating flooding when the banks break. Climate change can also increase rainfall in some areas, while bringing drought to others. Hira Ali 10 photographs to show to anyone who doesn't believe in climate change Smoke – filled with the carbon that is driving climate change – drifts across a field in Colombia. Sandra Rondon 10 photographs to show to anyone who doesn't believe in climate change Amid a flood in Islampur, Jamalpur, Bangladesh, a woman on a raft searches for somewhere dry to take shelter. Bangladesh is one of the most vulnerable places in the world to sea level rise, which is expected to make tens of millions of people homeless by 2050. Probal Rashid 10 photographs to show to anyone who doesn't believe in climate change Sindh province in Pakistan has experienced a grim mix of two consequences of climate change. “Because of climate change either we have floods or not enough water to irrigate our crop and feed our animals,” says the photographer. “Picture clearly indicates that the extreme drought makes wide cracks in clay. Crops are very difficult to grow.” Rizwan Dharejo 10 photographs to show to anyone who doesn't believe in climate change Hanna Petursdottir examines a cave inside the Svinafellsjokull glacier in Iceland, which she said had been growing rapidly. Since 2000, the size of glaciers on Iceland has reduced by 12 per cent. Tom Schifanella 10 photographs to show to anyone who doesn't believe in climate change A river once flowed along the depression in the dry earth of this part of Bangladesh, but it has disappeared amid rising temperatures. Abrar Hossain 10 photographs to show to anyone who doesn't believe in climate change A shepherd moves his herd as he looks for green pasture near the village of Sirohi in Rajasthan, northern India. The region has been badly affected by heatwaves and drought, making local people nervous about further predicted increases in temperature. Riddhima Singh Bhati 10 photographs to show to anyone who doesn't believe in climate change A factory in China is shrouded by a haze of air pollution. The World Health Organisation has warned such pollution, much of which is from the fossil fuels that cause climate change, is a “public health emergency”. Leung Ka Wa 10 photographs to show to anyone who doesn't believe in climate change Water levels in reservoirs, like this one in Gers, France, have been getting perilously low in areas across the world affected by drought, forcing authorities to introduce water restrictions. Mahtuf Ikhsan

Magnus Johannesson, director of the Arctic Council’s secretariat, declined to comment on the negotiations leading up to the declaration when contacted by The Independent.

But he said he thought the final document was a “very ambitious declaration”, noting its comments about reducing levels of black carbon and microplastics.

And he was prepared to say remarks similar to those deleted from the declaration at the request of the US.