NOTE: For accompanying slideshow, click here.

In a combative and sometimes colorful annual meeting, Chevron's CEO

and chairman exchanged barbs with activists over pollution in the

Amazon rain forest and the company's human rights record, twice

scolding speakers who addressed executives.

Chief executive David O'Reilly told one group that its report on Chevron's policies "deserves the trash can."

The nation's second-largest oil company is awaiting a verdict from a

judge in Ecuador that could come with a $27 billion price tag, though

any such decision would certainly draw an appeal.

Hundreds of protesters rallied outside, at one point blocking the entrance.

Confrontations outside and inside the company headquarters did not

change the outcome of three key shareholder proposals, though they did

garner more support than they've received in the past.

At the core of the protests was the suit in Ecuador. It claims that

Texaco, which Chevron bought in 2001, poisoned large swaths of the rain

forest by dumping billions of gallons of oil waste, causing cancers and

birth defects.

Chevron says Texaco spent $40 million on environmental cleanup there

and had been cleared of liability by the Ecuadorean government in power

at the time. Chevron said the state oil company PetroEcuador continued

to pollute the region after Texaco had left.

A proposal seeking a more detailed human rights policy from Chevron

got 28 percent of the vote. A separate proposal for a report on

Chevron's criteria for investing or operating in countries with

questionable human rights records took 26 percent of the vote. Another

measure focused on how Chevron assesses the environmental laws in other

countries got less than 7 percent.

Similar proposals in the past have never received more than 10 percent of the vote.

When one speaker took the microphone to talk about a report by

environmental organizations titled "The True Cost of Chevron," O'Reilly

called it "insulting to our employees and I think it deserves the trash

can."

The report cites Chevron for the destruction of communities, environmental damage and political oppression.

Chevron's overall finances have taken a hit in recent months as the

price of oil and natural gas plunged. Chevron's net income in the first

quarter fell 64 percent to $1.84 billion, while sales fell 45 percent

to $36.1 billion.

Like many other major corporations, a say-on-pay proposal was also

brought up for a vote. The nonbinding advisory proposal was rejected

with 42 percent of the vote.

A proposal seeking more clarity on Chevron's plans to help curb

climate change and lower its own greenhouse gases was withdrawn at the

last minute. The burning of fossil fuels is cited by researchers as a

reason for climate change.

Patricia Daly at Sisters of St. Dominic of Caldwell, N.J., a

faith-based institutional investor that supported the measure, called

greenhouse gases the "profound moral challenge for the day."

The group withdrew its proposal after meeting with Chevron's

management, said Daly, who was attending the Exxon Mobil shareholders'

meeting in Dallas.

"There was enough in the works so that we, in good faith, had to

withdraw our resolution," she said. "In the end, this is really good,

good business for the company."

The group did not withdraw the same resolution at Exxon, though that

annual meeting much less acrimonious. Exxon executives were also

questioned about environmental issues and executive pay, but

shareholders ultimately stood by management and voted down all 11

resolutions presented there.

AMP Section Name: Energy