Google, Netflix Stand up For Community Broadband in Colorado Netflix, Google and other companies have joined forced to fight a new Colorado bill that would make it more difficult for Colorado towns and cities to improve local broadband via public/private broadband partnerships. Colorado is one of twenty states that has passed ISP-lobbied bills that hinder community broadband. But last fall, countless towns began overwhelmingly voting to exempt themselves from Colorado's version of these protectionist laws, SB 152.

With Colorado communities making it clear they want to decide their local broadband future themselves, ISPs are again lobbying against the public interest. ISPs appear to have nudged Colorado state Senator Kerry Donovan to push SB 136, which Donovan claims is designed to "modernize" the original bill pushed for by ISPs in the state. Critics however have stated that the bill's goal is to over-ride the public interest and once again stack the legislative deck in favor of big broadband ISPs. “This seems to have been what [Donovan] is coming out with after working with industry,” Pitkin County Commissioner Rachel Richards complained earlier this year. “This bill is backwards. It may put us back under provisions we just got out of with the SB-152 vote. And it seems somewhat industry-oriented.” Among other things, this new bill would call anything over 256 kbps "broadband," while fiddling with zip code definitions of "served" to make incumbent broadband coverage look better than it actually is. As such, Google, Netflix, and a coalition of other organizations have fired off a letter (pdf) to Colorado legislators urging them to block the bill because it would only serve to expand the current barriers to community broadband and public-private partnerships in Colorado. "Communities in Colorado and across America are eager to work with willing established carriers, to enter into public-private partnerships with new entrants, to develop their own networks, if necessary, or to create other innovative means of acquiring affordable access to advanced communications capabilities," states the letter. "These are fundamentally local decisions that should be made by the communities themselves, through the processes that their duly elected and accountable local officials ordinarily use for making comparable decisions." In short, big ISPs paid Colorado politicians to pass a law protecting the status quo (limited competition, poor services, high prices). When locals overwhelmingly voted against such protectionist bills, ISPs and some politicians responded by trying to pass an update that would once again make it more difficult for towns and cities to do anything about dysfunctional, local broadband duopolies. Again, it's important to remember that towns and cities wouldn't be looking to get into the broadband business (or turning to public private projects) if they were happy with local broadband options. And while ISP lobbyists have tried to frame this is a partisan issue to quite intentionally sow division for more than a decade, letting communities decide for themselves the best broadband path forward has overwhelming bipartisan support in the state. Again, it's important to remember that towns and cities wouldn't be looking to get into the broadband business (or turning to public private projects) if they were happy with local broadband options. And while ISP lobbyists have tried to frame this is a partisan issue to quite intentionally sow division for more than a decade, letting communities decide for themselves the best broadband path forward has overwhelming bipartisan support in the state.







News Jump California Defends Its Net Neutrality Law; AT&T's Traffic Up 20% Despite Data Traffic Actually Being Down; + more news Are The Comcast-Charter X1 Talks Dead In The Water?; AT&T May Offer Phone Plans With Ads For Discounts; + more news Europe's Top Court: Net Neutrality Rules Bar Zero Rating; ViacomCBS To Rebrand CBS All Access As Paramount+; + more news Verizon To Buy Reseller TracFone For $7B; 5G Not The Competitive Threat To Cable Many Thought It Would Be; + more news MS.Wants Records From AT&T On $300M Project; Google Fiber Outages In Austin, Houston, Other Texan Cities; + more news States With The Biggest Decreases In Speed; AT&T Hopes You'll Forget Its Fight Against Accurate Maps; + more news AT&T's CEO Has A Familiar $olution To US Broadband Woes; EarthLink Files Suit Against Charter; + more news 5G Doesn't Live Up To Hype, AT&T's 5G Slower Than Its 4G; Cord-Cutting Now In 37% of Broadband Households; + more news FCC Cited False Broadband Data Despite Warnings; ZTE, Huawei Replacement Cost Is $1.87B, But Only $1B Allocated; + more Cogeco Rejects Altice USA's Atlantic Broadband Bid; AT&T Is Astroturfing The FCC In Support Of Trump Attack; + more news ---------------------- this week last week most discussed

Most recommended from 16 comments



Flyonthwall

@teksavvy.com 7 recommendations Flyonthwall Anon I don't understand the complaint If a company does not want to provide a service in a manner people want, they have every right to find or create an alternative. No company has the right to customer business. And it's laughable that they think they can legislate it. Government reps need to get off the teat. If tax dollars aren't enough for your income, quit your job and go to work directly with them. But stop selling your access.