



Israel (and Probably the Mossad in Particular) Is Responsible for Spying on Millions of Americans

“ BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU, the caption said, while the dark eyes looked deep into Winston’s own….It was the police patrol, snooping into people’s windows. The patrols did not matter, however. Only the Thought Police mattered.” —George Orwell, Nineteen Eighty-Four

Neoconservative hawks never cease to amaze me. Frank Gaffney of FrontPage Magazine wrote about three months ago:

Arif Alikhan – Assistant Secretary for Policy Development for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

Mohammed Elibiary – Homeland Security Adviser.







Rashad Hussain – Special Envoy to the (OIC) Organization of the Islamic Conference

Salam al-Marayati – Obama Adviser, founder of Muslim Public Affairs Council and its current executive director.

Imam Mohamed Magid – Obama’s Sharia Czar, Islamic Society of North America.

Eboo Patel – Advisory Council on Faith-Based Neighborhood Partnerships.

Now, look at this “Jewish Brotherhood” in the Obama administration. It came directly from the Jewish Virtual Library:

Current Staff Members Jack Lew Secretary of the Treasury David Plouffe Senior Advisor to the President Danielle Borrin Associate Director, Office of Public Engagement; Special Assistant to the Vice Preisdent Gary Gensler Chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission Dan Shapiro Ambassador to Israel Gene Sperling Director National Economic Council Mary Schapiro Chairwoman of the Securities and Exchange Commission Steven Simon Head of Middle East/North Africa Desk at the National Security Council Eric Lynn Middle East Policy Advisor Past Staff Members Rahm Emmanuel (2009-2010) Chief of Staff to the President David Axelrod (2009-2011) Senior Advisor to the President Elena Kagan (2009-2010) Solicitor General of the United States Peter Orszag (2009-2010) Director of the Office of Management and Budget Lawrence Summers (’09-’11) Director National Economic Council Mona Sutphen (2009-2011) Deputy White House Chief of Staff James Steinberg (’09-’11 ) Deputy Secretary of State Dennis Ross (2009-2011 ) Special Assistant to the President, Senior Director for the Central Region to the Secretary of State Ronald Klain (2009-2011) Chief of Staff to the Vice President Jared Bernstein (2009-2011) Chief Economist and Economic Policy Advisor to the Vice President Susan Sher (2009-2011) Chief of Staff to the First Lady Lee Feinstein (2009) Campaign Foreign Policy Advisor Mara Rudman (2009) Foreign Policy Advisor

The list did not include other Jews such as Lois Lerner, Jacob Lew, Douglas Shulman of the IRS. How about Micahel Chertoff of Homeland Security?

I’ve got more bad news for Gaffney. During Obama’s first term, Elizabeth Drew of the New York Times Review of Books reported that Rahm Emmanuel, David Axelrod, and others were “running the White House.”

Alan Dershowitz himself stated then, “Obama is surrounded by Jewish advisors who understand how Israel works, and even has a senior advisor with an Israeli background.”

Right before Obama ascended to the throne for the second time in 2013, Dershowitz wrote in the Jerusalem Post that Jews like himself

“must now realize that our support for the president will be good for Israel over the next four years…Jews vote for both parties. Nobody is ignoring us. Every rational candidate knows that they and their party must earn our votes in every election.”

Dershowitz then declared something that would have been a shock to the Founding Fathers:

“Most Americans, regardless of religion, are united in support of Israel’s security, but divided about social and economic issues. It is critically important that support for Israel’s security remains a bipartisan issue, and never becomes a wedge issue that divides voters along party lines, as it has in some European countries.”

In other words, even though the economy is a dismal failure both in Europe and in America, even though millions of Americans were out of work, even though cities like Detroit have been leveled to near economic ruined, even though this generation has been “hobbled by the soaring cost of college,” even though people are being cheated out of their pensions and retirement plans, even though precious soldiers who fought Israel’s wars in the Middle East have been cheated out of their pensions by “predators,” to use the New York Times’ own words, Americans must support Israel. One particular student, Ken Ilgunas, actually sleeps in a van to escape loan debt.

He laments after many job rejections, “I had this huge $32,000 student debt and at the time I was pushing carts at Home Depot, making $8 an hour. I was just getting kind of frantic.”

Last March, the Washington Times put out an article entitled, “Drone Industry Predicts Explosive Economic Boost.”

Similarly, the Seattle Times declared back in 2009, “Boeing Drone Maker Creates Technology Jobs Near Gorge.” In March of this year, it was reported that “The US drone economy will create 100,000 jobs…”

In other words, you’ve got a huge college debt and want a job? You’ve got to learn how to kill Muslims! You’ve got to be in the Zionist matrix. As the 29-year old former C.I.A. computer technician Edward Joseph Snowden has recently declared, “Most of the people training us seemed pumped up about killing Arabs, not helping anyone.”

Moreover, the IRS continued to cheat the average American who is trying to put food on the table. “The Internal Revenue Service can’t find the receipts from a $4 million agency conference in 2010 — meaning, it can’t provide the same documentation for business-related travel it requires Americans to include on tax filings.” (Lerner had previously sued Christian Coalition but lost the case. )

In addition, veterans who have been disabled due to the war are finding that it is very hard to get their disability benefit. There were at least 600,000 of those cases this past spring. Despite all of that, “Born-again neocon” President Obama has been unconditionally supporting Israel both financially and militarily.

The Jewish Telegraphic Agency even titled an article “Welcome to Obama’s Jewish America.” Likewise, the front cover of New York Magazine declared in 2008, “The First Jewish President.” Jacob Heilbrunn himself declared, “Whether they praise or denounce Obama, the neocons are winning…He ends up catering to them.”

Consider this: one week after his State of the Union address, Obama “sent his FY2011 budget request to Congress, which included a record-breaking $3 billion in military aid to Israel.”

More recently, it was reported by the Washington Post that Obama will pick “Bruce Heyman, a Goldman Sachs partner in the Windy City,” as U.S. ambassador to Canada. “Heyman runs a private wealth fund at Goldman Sachs….He would replace David Jacobson, who’s also from Chicago.”

In 2009, Rabbi David Saperstein became part of Obama’s Council for Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnership. Saperstein’s wife, Ellen Weiss, is a former National Public Radio vice president. The Washington Post calls Saperstein the “quintessential religious lobbyist on Capital Hill.”

Back in 2008, a very small number of people launched the “Rabbis for Obama” movement in order to attract Jewish individuals to vote for Obama. Rabbi Capers Funnye, the chief rabbi of the Beth Shalom B’nai Zaken Ethiopian Hebrew Congregation in southwest Chicago, is Michelle Obama’s cousin.

Israeli Rabbi Ovadia Yosef declared that Obama is a “kind of king of our time.” As such, the president, continues the good rabbi, “can declare war on an enemy state” and “has the authority to pardon those sentence to death.”

Keep in mind that it was Yosef who declared in 2010 that the “Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world—only to serve the People of Israel. In Israel, death has no dominion over them…With gentiles, it will be like any person—they need to die, but [God] will give them longevity…Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat. That is why gentiles were created.”

Israel Shahak and Norton Mevvinsky write that Yosef believes that “Jews killing non-Jews does not constitute murder according to the Jewish religion and that killing of innocent Arabs for reasons of revenge is a Jewish virtue.”

In other words, according to this principle, Gentiles have to prostrate before the cross of Jewish ideology in order to survive—and this Jewish ideology seems to replace the cross of Calvary.

Susan Rice is a recent and classic example. Right before she was appointed as National Security Adviser, she went online and twitted: “on my way to AIPAC’s dinner in NYC. Looking forward to speaking about U.S. commitment to #Israel, spanning generations and political parties.” Power has already taken a hawkish position on perpetual wars in the Middle East.

So what is really Gaffney’s point? What is he implanting into his readers’ minds? If he is inciting his readers to revolt against the “Muslim Brotherhood” in the White House, then should he do the same thing with the modern “Sanhedrin” that always tells U.S. presidents what to do in the Middle East? Should he do the same thing with AIPAC, an organization that has been a fifth column in the U.S. since its inception?

Gaffney probably did not know that it was Bill Kristol who declared that Obama is “a born-again neocon,” meaning that our president is following same old Jewish bloodbath in the Middle East.

Right after our beloved president received his Zionist baptism, he began to push the envelope even more by monitoring millions of Americans and invading their privacy through their emails and cell phone messages. This has been going on for nearly six years through companies such as Google, Facebook, and most recently Apple.

Google CEO Larry Page and Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg deny that they had any knowledge of the black operation, despite the fact that those companies knew that the government was implementing a secret surveillance program.

The New York Times, however, declares,

“The companies that negotiated with the government include Google, which owns YouTube; Microsoft, which owns Hotmail and Skype; Yahoo; Facebook; AOL; Apple; and Paltalk, according to one of the people briefed on the discussions. “

Obama calls those invasions “modest encroachments on privacy,” a “critical tool,” a “right balance,” and a legal one at that. Contrast that to the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution:

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

Then the president drops this laughable statement:

“And the modest encroachments on privacy that are involved in getting phone numbers, or duration [of calls] without a name attached, and without looking at content, that on net it was worth us doing.”

One needn’t be an intellectual to see that this is generally dumb. How can you really monitor people’s phone calls and conversations “without a name attached” and “without looking at content”? If they are allegedly looking for terrorists, how are they going to identify the individual in question without a name attached? The president continued to say that “nobody is listening to your phone calls.”

The president is implicitly saying that the U.S. government is using your tax money to monitor phone conversations—and this happens daily —but “no one is listening to your conversations”! How can he maintain such an obvious contradiction in public while his head doesn’t explode?

Our beloved president is a lawyer, and he certainly has the critical tool to recognize an obvious contradiction. In fact, when he was a senator, Obama “opposed provisions granting retroactive immunity to telecommunications companies that shared private client information with the government.” But the Zionist matrix does not allow him to think straight.

There’s more: “If the intelligence community then actually wants to listen to a phone call, they’ve got to go back to a federal judge, just like they would in a criminal investigation.”

They have already broken the law by invading people’s privacy, so why would they want to “go back to a federal judge” when they can do virtually whatever they please?

The Senate Intelligence Chairman Dianne Feinstein, of course, declared that monitoring phone conversations is lawful. But Feinstein had one nagging problem: she could not tell us where in the Constitution it states that invading people’s privacy is lawful.

Not only that, Feinstein wanted to punish whoever made the secret public, and that person would be Edward Snowden. Snowden himself has already foreseen his fate, “I will be made to suffer for my actions.”

Under “born-again neocon” Obama, we now have a fully established police state, where the NSA “now monitors huge volumes of records of domestic emails and Internet searches as well as bank transfers, credit-card transactions, travel and telephone records.” The U.S. is already preparing charges against him.

Jody Westby of Forbes writes that June 6, 2013 will go down in history as “the day America found big brother in big data.”

Obama himself declares that the age of 100 percent privacy is over:

“It’s important to recognize that you can’t have 100 percent security and also then have 100 percent privacy and zero inconvenience. We’re going to have to make some choices as a society.”

Glenn Greenwald and Ewen MacAskill of the British newspaper the Guardian go even further to say that offensive cyber capabilities have already been taken place in order to “advance U.S. objectives around the world.”

This is congruent with Zionism’s world domination, and it is safe to say that our “born-again neocon” president is more aggressive than Bush, particularly on domestic policy. This has recently stunned the Associated Press.

Israeli Companies with NSA (and Perhaps the Mossad) Monitor Millions of Americans—Daily!

The million dollar question is this: Were Israeli companies involved in collecting U.S. communications? According to the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, the answer is a resounding yes.

Haaretz declares,

“Two Israeli companies…conduct bugging and wiretapping for the NSA. erint, which took over its parent company Comverse Technology earlier this year, is responsible for tapping the communication lines of the American telephone giant Verizon, according to a past Verizon employee sited by James Bamford in Wired. Neither Verint nor Verizon commented on the matter.

“Natus, which was acquired in 2010 by the American company Boeing, supplied the software and hardware used at AT&T wiretapping rooms, according to whistleblower Mark Klein, who revealed the information in 2004. Klein, a past technician at AT&T who filed a suit against the company for spying on its customers, revealed a ‘secret room,’ in the company’s San Fransisco office, where the NSA collected data on American citizens’ telephone calls and Internet surfing….

“Both Verint and Narus have ties to the Israeli intelligence agency and the Israel Defense Forces intelligence-gathering unit 8200…. Given the close ties between U.S. and Israeli intelligence, the question arises as to whether Israeli intelligence, including the Mossad, was party to the secret”

The newspaper says that the secret programs “sweep up an estimated 3 billion phone calls a day…” This evidence is corroborated by Michael Kelley of Business Insider.

According to whistleblower and computer engineer Mark Klein, NSA “vacuumed up Internet and phone-call data from ordinary Americans with the cooperation of AT&T…” Kelley said that “One of the founders of Verint, Jacob ‘Kobi’ Alexander, is a former Israeli intelligence officer.”

And here’s the interesting news: “A co-founder and former chairmen of Narus, Ori Cohen, told Fortune in 2001 that his partners have done technology work for Israeli intelligence.”

Back in 2011, “another former chief of Unit 8200 acknowledged to the Israeli paper Haaretz that high-tech firms around the world employ both Unit 8200 equipment and its veteran personnel.”

Israel, Not Iran, Is the West’s Primary Enemy

No country in the entire history of America has ever been able to monitor millions upon millions of American citizens until now. In other words, what we are seeing here is that the Zionist machine in Israel is the most dangerous regime in recent memory.

The West’s primary enemy is not Iran, or Russia, or even North Korea. The West’s primary enemy is the country that can send missiles to any city in the West at any time—and that country is Israel. Lest you say that this is pure speculation, 28-year old CIA veteran Paul R. Pillar said just that a few weeks ago.

That particular country, with its spiritual decadence and decades of Palestinian carnage, has been theologically called “The Synagogue of Satan.” That “Synagogue” has produced Jewish revolutionary cells over the centuries, and over time those revolutionaries (with the help of the ministry of propaganda called “Hollywood”) spread their Zionist wings all over the world.

It cannot be emphasized enough that the “Synagogue” is powerful and is based on a massive lie and deceit. The recent Zionist regime in Israel and even America is part of that manifestation.

Jewish revolutionary cells began to persecute Christians in the first century, and the people who were part of those revolutionary movements were and still are “contrary to all men” (1 Thessalonians 2:14). Some translations say they “work against all humanity,” or they “oppose all mankind,” or they “are hostile to everyone.”

Only two newspapers have reported that Israel was behind the scene (Haaretz and Business Insider). Image the reaction if Iran happens to monitor just one state in the United States. The neoconservative hawks would quickly summon hundreds of fictitious arguments as to why the U.S. ought to bomb Iran.

Obama and Bush: Two Sides of the Same Coin

Top CIA lawyer John Rizzo declared in 2011 that Obama continued to support Bush’s policies. “With a notable exception of the enhanced interrogation program,” Rizzo noted then, the Obama administration

“changed virtually nothing with respect to existing CIA programs and operations. Things continued. Authorities were continued that were originally granted by President Bush beginning shortly after 9/11. Those were all picked up, reviewed and endorsed by the Obama administration.”

Obama promised to shut down Guantanamo during his presidential campaign, but this has yet to happen. Instead, it has been reported that detainees are undergoing “genital searches…”

By 2009 and 2010, Bush and Obama were so ideologically intertwined that the Washington Post, the Village Voice and other media outlets put out articles entitled “George W. Obama.” Monitoring phone conversations started under the Bush administration.

Sometimes law enforcement uses these forms of tracking devices “with little or no court oversight, documents show.” And FBI is known to have broken the law and invaded U.S. citizens’ privacy for years. The Washington Post declared in 2010:

“The FBI illegally collected more than 2,000 U.S. telephone call records between 2002 and 2006 by invoking terrorism emergencies that did not exist or simply persuading phone companies to provide records, according to internal bureau memos and interviews. FBI officials issued approvals after the fact to justify their actions.

“E-mails obtained by The Washington Post detail how counterterrorism officials inside FBI headquarters did not follow their own procedures that were put in place to protect civil liberties. The stream of urgent requests for phone records also overwhelmed the FBI communications analysis unit with work that ultimately was not connected to imminent threats.”

We know very well that every United States president has to pass the Israel test, otherwise he simply will not make it.

Even people who do not want to admit that there is a Jewish influence in virtually everything that pertains to culture and politics end up admitting just that. Joe Biden himself wrote a few days ago, “I bet you 85 percent of those changes, whether it’s in Hollywood or social media are a consequence of Jewish leaders in the industry.”

Abraham Foxman Is Defending “Muslim-Baiting”

If Gaffney is losing his sleep over the “Muslim Brotherhood” in the Obama administration, then he can’t be serious.

Inconsistency notwithstanding, Jewish organizations have come to play a central role in policing just about anything in the cultural landscape. Listen to this revealing and telling interview with Abraham Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League:

Interviewer: You don’t think that “Muslim-baiting” is much more acceptable in the mainstream media than, say, “Jew-baiting”? There is a Congressman now who is calling for the authorities to keep track of the entire Muslim community.

Foxman: I don’t think that’s Muslim-baiting. It’s a natural response. It may be wise or unwise. But I think America’s got an issue now, and not only America. You look at France, you look at London, you look at Amsterdam — most of these incidents have come from Muslim communities that have been brought in and are not assimilating. Just like after 9/11, America is now questioning where the balance is between security and freedom of expression: Should we follow the ethnic communities? Should we be monitoring mosques? This isn’t Muslim-baiting — it’s driven by fear, by a desire for safety and security.

Muslims should accept Foxman’s challenge here and should turn the table around. Should we monitor synagogues and Jewish revolutionaries? Should we spy on a “perverted rabbi” who “admits kid sex” ? Should we monitor the neoconservatives who sent a six-trillion-dollar bill to the American people?

Should we put those neoconservatives to jail for sending our precious soldiers in Iraq to die under false pretense?

Should Jewish revolutionaries such as Eli Roth be under surveillance for saying things like Hemlock Grove, his new Netflix series, will “fu$k up an entire generation”?

In order to screw everybody, this series has to be global. Roth, known as “The Bear Jew,” continues, “I don’t just want this to be a hit on Netflix in America. I want the show to become a global phenomenon, because horror is one of the few areas where you can really appeal to a worldwide audience.” (We will meet “The Bear Jew” in a future article again.)

These are some of the issues that Foxman has to answer for us with consistency.

As we are beginning to see, every person of good will must resist this Zionist/diabolical madness, which stands against reason, decency, and common sense. This diabolical ideology ultimately leads to the enslavement of all mankind and the death of the West in particular.

This is one reason why it is important for people of reason and of all background to stand firm and demolish this madness in its political and ideological form. As Alexander Solzhenitsyn put it,

“And thus, overcoming our temerity, let each man choose: will he remain a witting servant of the lies, or has the time come for him to stand straight as an honest man, worthy of the respect of his children and contemporaries?”

Quoted in Akiva Eldar, “Dershowitz: Obama Needs Hard Line on Iran to Win Israeli Support,”

Author Details Author Details Jonas E. Alexis Read Jonas Alexis’s latest posts here >>>



Jonas E. Alexis has degrees in mathematics and philosophy. He studied education at the graduate level. His main interests include U.S. foreign policy, history of Israel/Palestine conflict, and the history of ideas. He is the author of the new book Zionism vs. the West: How Talmudic Ideology is Undermining Western Culture. He teaches mathematics in South Korea. Jonas E. Alexis has degrees in mathematics and philosophy. He studied education at the graduate level. His main interests include U.S. foreign policy, history of Israel/Palestine conflict, and the history of ideas. He is the author of the new book Zionism vs. the West: How Talmudic Ideology is Undermining Western Culture. He teaches mathematics in South Korea.