Interactive: Compare proposed fixes for Pa.’s gerrymandered congressional map Pennsylvania’s most recent map of congressional districts was declared an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander by the state Supreme Court, sparking a nasty political and legal fight and setting off a scramble to draw a new map for the 2018 midterm elections. Click here to compare competing proposals from groups involved in the case.

With that avenue blocked, participants in the case scrambled to draw their own map proposals.

When it overturned the map, the Pennsylvania justices said they would adopt its own map by Monday. It appointed a special adviser, well-known redistricting expert and Stanford University law professor Nathaniel Persily, to help it do so, and said participants in the case could submit maps and comments for consideration. Scarnati and Turzai stood by their map submission, while other participants submitted their own proposals.

In the days since, the groups have continued to fight. Sunday night, Scarnati and Turzai wrote to the state Supreme Court that it should accept their map, calling it “the best overall plan” and saying it creates the largest number of competitive districts. They also told the court that some of the maps should be rejected outright and accused Lt. Gov. Mike Stack and Senate Democrats, in their proposals, of attempting to gerrymander in their own favor, saying those maps were “deliberately drawn to pack Republican voters into a limited number of uncompetitive districts and to cement a 10-8 Democratic majority.”

It’s unclear what time the Pennsylvania Supreme Court will release its map.