Click the photo to enlarge



[Updated 17 Oct 2016] – Reviewing this post, I searched and discovered the final ruling on the Hartford Courant’s FOIA ruling that demanded all documents related to Adam Lanza be released. However, on April 11th of this year the Judge in the case ruled that the papers would NOT be released to the public. Quoting from the article:Huh? The owner of the documents is DEAD, and there is no criminal case.Thus, key evidence that was cited in the media does not ever have to see the light of day and scrutiny of anyone who doubts the official story. Read the press release HERE , and I have archived it as well. ..[Updated 24 Jul 2015] – Back in May 2015 , the Hartford Courant had won an FOIA ruling on Adam Lanza’s personal documents, held by the police (archived HERE ). The court ordered that the documents be released. However, on 29 Jun, the police department appealed the order and we are now awaiting it’s appeal (appeal story archived HERE ). I find it extremely interesting that one of the FOIA ruled documents to be released are “……” This is in reference to the “reams and reams” of paper about mass murders that was initially reported by the newspapers via the police, but never materialized (see further below). Also, as I talk about further down, there is evidence that there may have been either molestation or something else with Adam, and you can view info about that further down…we will have to wait and see if the info is released, or even if it ever existed…[Updated 13 Feb 2015] – I have posted a link to the just releasedand will update this post on anything I eventually find in it.[Updated 26 Jan 2015] – In Book 00206061 , the Ct State Police registered a “confidential informant”. However, no mention of this informant, or what they had to offer, has been found by me so far. Why, in a case that was open and shut, and in which Adam Lanza was declared the sole suspect, with no outside help, would you need a confidential informant?In book 00194623 , page 45, a knife is displayed. On the handle you can see two carved pentagrams, one with the star pointing downward. Not sure if this was made this way or someone added them: 00256315 , Natalie Hammond (lead teacher who was in the conference room and was shot) described the shooter as “5” – Adam Lanza was 6′ tall, 112 lbs, and wore a black stocking cap, not a mask…[Updated 23 Jan 2015] – In Book 00184096 , page 15, Officer Penna is in room 10 (where Adam Lanza lies dead) and states information on types of weapons involved in shooting:This is clearly not related to the car that Adam drove, because Officer Penna had radio’d in the suspect car as he ran past it, never mentioning guns. Also, people try to say that a police office must’ve “dropped” a shotgun shell in the hallway, however, officer Penna was clearly in room 10, not the hallway, and the Active Shooter formation of CSP Lt Davis, CSP Sgt Cario, Officer Chapman and Officer Smith are the only ones at this point who entered that room (p 13, 9:51:31). This could have easily been cleared up by asking them if they were using a shotgun when they entered the room. Since it was not cleared up, how did this reported shotgun end up from inside the school to the car?[Updated 02 Jan 2015] – In document 257980, book 2 of the State Police Report, we have a very strange incident – the police are requesting the ping location of Kaitlin Roeg’s cellphone, which is then located by Sprint to be located in the woods by Sandy Hook elementary school. (an aerial photo is included showing the presumed location of the phone) Note that this was on the day of the shooting…This is the same Kaitlin Roeg who officers said was “hysterical” that they were shooters, and not come to rescue her, yet in her later interviews says she walked the children out calmly (see my update below dated 23 Jul 2014). As this Kaitlin Roeg is the “star” teacher who protected her students, and would not have been in the woods at any point that day, HOW DID HER PHONE end up there? I found the report ( 00003242 ) where Kaitlin Roeg tells an officer she thinks the shooter “might have taken her phone” and how the police got Sprint to triangulate the phones position…[Updated 22 Nov 2014] – The Office of the Child Advocate has released “ Shooting At Sandy Hook School “, archived here . I am writing a post (in progress) about this report and you can read it at “ Inconvenient Truth #83: The OCA Report on Adam Lanza, AKA AL “, but please note it is an ongoing process. A major finding within the report will be revealed in this post.[Updated 01 Aug 2014] – I have extracted pages 4-6 of “00019345.pdf”, which details a meeting the police had with family members after the shooting. These three pages are the “official” timeline of event’s that morning, and were given out as “confidential” to the family members. One item worth noting is the person who was shot in the hallway and retreats into the classroom: Their identity is redacted. As I “assume” this is an adult, and not a child, why would they redact this identity and not the others documented? And if it is a child, why single them out and only note that the shooter killed students in each room (not identifying them by name)? You can read the entire document HERE