[TruthShallPrevail]

Historical Development of Modern Feudalism:

The TRUTH about your status as a slave in America

(by unknowingly volunteering)

by Allen Aslan Heart

http://www.real-debt- elimination.com/bank_fraud/ taking_back_your_power/1- introduction_to_taking_back_ your_power.htm

Since 1933 you and all other Americans have been pledged for the debt

of the UNITED STATES owed to international bankers, most of whom are

foreign to our country. Your credit, labor, productivity and

property have been used and is now being used as collateral by the

incorporated UNITED STATES OF AMERICA without your knowledge or

consent. This is legal until you take back your implied consent by a

special, lawful process.



In fact, you are unknowingly volunteering to be chattel for a

mortgage held by financiers from the founding of this nation.

Perhaps you infer that the name on the tax statement is yours and so

you respond as though it were. This is voluntary servitude. To make

this servitude legal it was necessary to "cut a hole in the fence."

No matter that the escape route is hidden, obscured by legal brambles

to make escape difficult. That it is not used presumes consent. It

is not impossible, just seemingly difficult and even implausible.



Your status as a subject is based upon a presumption that if you did

not wish to be so encumbered you would use the law to do something

about it. As long as you do not use the escape route provided by law

it is presumed that you are content to "remain in the pasture and be

milked and used as chattel." This word has the same root as the

word, "cattle." Do you get the picture?



Can such a premise be true? It seems totally out of step with

everything you and I have ever known about our world, our nation, our

government and our relationship to it! Our parents never behaved as

though they we were chattel. They dutifully paid their taxes, voted

in elections, waved an American flag on the 4th of July. Our

teachers taught us about our history, our Declaration of Independence

and Constitution, our Revolutionary War, how we fought the greatest

army and navy the world had ever seen at the time. Nowhere in our

history classes did we encounter any such premise of subjection to a

central government that rules our lives. Our civics teacher never

told us anything about this. Nothing in our world even hinted that

we were subjects to a highly centralized government. Surely this

could be true of other peoples, but not of us! For most people this

cannot be. The truth cannot be heard because it is too discordant

with our entire experience.



And yet we can document that George Washington did not chop down a

cherry tree, Lincoln did not free the slaves (they became subjects of

the Federal District, the District of Columbia), The War with Mexico

was begun by General Zachary Taylor's provocations along the Nueces

River, the battleship Maine blew up from the inside, Woodrow Wilson

knew that the Lusitania was carrying US munitions to the war in

Europe and would be sunk, Franklin D. Roosevelt had maneuvered the

Japanese into an attack on Pearl Harbor and had cut fuel shipments to

the Pacific fleet to ensure the presence of enough old ships to offer

a tempting target, Truman knew that there were other good

alternatives to an invasion of Japan and did not need to drop the

Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Roosevelt knew about the NAZI

concentration camps, LBJ knew that there was no attack on the Maddox

and Turner Joy in the Gulf of Tonkin when he asked for a

Congressional Resolution to attack North Vietnam, and the US

government had been warned by numerous documented sources that there

would be an attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. All

of this is from documented historical sources. Yet we continue to

believe the myths that are in our histories, our movies, our

mainstream media and our mass consciousness. John F Kennedy warned

us that,



The great enemy of the Truth is very often not the lie - deliberate,

contrived, and dishonest - but the myth - persistent, persuasive and

realistic.



You will probably find it hard to accept that you have been living in

an illusion for your whole life. Much of what you believe is an

illusion and you will only find your freedom when you can allow

yourself to look behind the veils of illusion to see Reality. WHO you

are is far greater than "what" you perceive yourself to be. When you

have the courage to stand face-to-face with the illusion and call it

what it is, you will have stepped through the most difficult task set

before you on your Earth Journey. There IS a way out! But the only

way out is through—through understanding how we came to this

predicament and following a precise formula to obtain your

sovereignty. We have been warned repeatedly throughout our history,

but we weren't listening very closely. Now we might have one more

chance to take back our power and our sovereignty.



The nature of the conspiracy to defraud can be best understood in

comments by one of the major conspirators in the triumph of

establishing the Federal Reserve, "Colonel" Edward Mandell House, who

is purported to have said this in a private meeting with President

Woodrow Wilson:



"[Very] soon, every American will be required to register their

biological property in a national system designed to keep track of

the people and that will operate under the ancient system of

pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our

agenda, which will effect our security as a chargeback for our fiat

paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer

being unable to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel, and

we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of

the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions.







Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of

lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to

remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges.

They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value

designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not

one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident

one or two should figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible

deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund

government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form

of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge

profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a

contributor to this fraud which we will call `Social Insurance.'

Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we

may incur and in this manner, every American will unknowingly be our

servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and

without any hope for their redemption and, we will employ the high

office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot

against America."



We now know how to respond to this treasonous fraud. All my life I've

looked for the roots of war, injustice and oppression because if we

can find the basis of the rampant injustice in the world, we could

relieve enormous struggle and suffering. I've wondered at how little

the Constitution seemed to affect the courts and how often the truth

was buried in silence. Mostly I saw greed and heartlessness in a

power struggle played out in politics. But I didn't realize that the

game had been played in secret throughout American history. And

ultimately, it is a game of monetary policy and politics…. with a

spiritual component.



Like you, I've watched and participated in the American scene for

many years. I've written many letters to the editor, congressmen,

senators, presidents, distributed campaign literature to precincts,

represented my precinct at county conventions, served food at Loaves

and Fishes, planted flowers at the feet of police threatening to

arrest those who had taken over HUD homes designated for the

homeless, worked with Welfare Moms, served as chairman of church

social ministry, fasted, spoke to churches on social justice,

supported the protestors at Honeywell demonstrations against the

manufacture of cluster bombs, arrested for a war toy protest, booked,

finger-printed, arraigned, marched in protest of the Vietnam War, the

Gulf War, and the attacks on Serbia and Kosovo.







A Peak into the Mind of a Tory



In 1999 I watched in utter amazement as the Supreme Court of the

United States overturned the Florida State Supreme Court's decision

to proceed with a recount of the contested ballots and the Eleventh

District Court decision to uphold the decision of the Florida court.

In Orwellian doublespeak, Antonin Scalia wrote on Saturday, December

9, 1999:



"the counting of the votes that are of questionable legality does in

my view threaten irreparable harm to [Bush], and to the country, by

casting a cloud upon which he claims to be the legitimacy of his

election. Count first, and rule upon legality afterwards, is not a

recipe for producing election results that have the public acceptance

democratic stability requires."



It was a brazen and Orwellian declaration. What American who believes

in democracy could claim that something was wrong with counting

votes "first"? What American who believes in democracy could declare

one candidate the winner and protect him from "irreparable harm" if a

vote count showed him not to be the winner, after all? Of course, it

doesn't make any sense, unless you realize the foundation upon which

Scalia based his transparently partisan remarks. He doesn't believe

in democracy, he doesn't even believe in republicanism, he is a

monarchist.



Scalia revealed his true motivations when he spoke on the subject of

capital punishment at the University of Chicago (February 2002).

During his remarks, he stated: "The reaction of people of faith to

this tendency of democracy to obscure the divine authority behind

government should not be resignation to it, but the resolution to

combat it as effectively as possible." ("God's Justice and Ours" at

http://www.firstthings.com/ftissues/ft0205/articles/scalia.html )



Democracy obscuring divine authority behind government? Perhaps this

helps shed some light on why Scalia and the four other right-

wing "justices" could so easily subvert our election process and,

through an act of divine intervention, usher the son onto the throne

lost some eight years earlier by his father, George I. We are

assuming that we are still independent sovereigns and freemen as

declared by our Declaration of Independence and that the Constitution

is still in effect. Scalia has no such illusion. History supports

his position, sorry to say.



Scalia is an ideologue so accustomed to our willingness to continue

to be subjects that he does not even consider the ideal of a

government of, by, and for the people. That ideal has remained as

useful fiction to be taught in Civics classes and mouthed by the

politicians. HE KNOWS that we are mere chattel by presumption.

Since we have not even discovered that our status as freemen has been

lost through more than two hundred years of our history, much less

withdrawn our implied consent to be subjects, we are presumed to be

subjects before the courts and in the minds of people like Scalia.



Scalia speaks of civil disobedience with contempt and quotes the

Bible, "Ye must needs be subject." We must, as mere servants of the

ruling class, acquiesce to our divinely guided leaders. For who are

we, as mere subjects, to question those who make (or interpret) the

laws? After all, he says that "government carries the sword as 'the

minister of God,' to 'execute wrath' upon the evildoer." No, he has

not reverted to a justice of another time—WE have by our ignorance

and silence, acquiesced to a lower status reminiscent of another

time.



There you have it! In his eyes, we are subjects unworthy of honor,

peace and justice. Somehow Scalia's statements seem like a long way

from the Declaration of Independence in which Americans stood before

the world as sovereigns invested with certain inalienable rights,

including the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

After the American Revolution, the monarchies of Europe saw Democracy

as an unnatural, ungodly, ideological threat, every bit as radical

and dangerous as Communism was regarded by Western nations upon its

inception. Just as the 1917 Communist Revolution in Russia spawned

other revolutions around the world, the American Revolution provided

an example and incentive for people all over the world to overthrow

their European monarchies. What has happened? When did we give up

our natural, God-given rights? Our forefathers fought and won that

war didn't they?







Sovereignty, Revolution, Birth of a New Nation



Yes, our forefathers fought one of the bloodiest wars in history and

won their independence. They understood the historical roots of war,

injustice and oppression, and we've lost this knowledge. Our history

books did, indeed, leave out a lot of the truth and lied about much

of the rest. History teachers often teach history in such a way that

young students swear to never again study history! When I attempted

to teach American History from sources outside the history books I

was forced from my 26-year teaching career by my principal. We have

been led and lulled to forget WHO we are. All this has been

engineered by those who would keep us ignorant of the truth.



The primary reason for the War for Independence was not "taxation

without representation", but the forced payment of taxes to the King

in gold instead of paper money. America was flourishing by using her

own "fiat money" system based only on production, not a gold-based

system that could be manipulated by the King. The King could

not "control" the fiat money system and therefore passed a law

requiring that taxes be paid in gold only. The King had most of the

gold—the colonies had little; so unemployment ensued—and embittered

colonists cried for war. Benjamin Franklin put it this way, "The

colonies would have gladly born the little tax on tea, and other

matters, had it not been that England took away from the colonies

their money." Prior to the Revolutionary War, The Times of London

said this regarding fiat money in America:



"If this mischievous financial policy, which has its origins in North

America, shall become endurrated down to a fixture, then that

government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off

debts and be without debt. It will have all the money necessary to

carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous without precedent in

the history of the world. The brains and the wealth of all the

countries will go to North America. That country must be destroyed

or it will destroy every Monarchy on the

globe."



The truth is that the Revolution failed. You might say that we won a

military victory over the most powerful military force on the planet

at the time. However, reading the Treaty of Paris it is clear that we

were not exactly negotiating as equals.



We had won the recall of British troops but not the bankers. Even

though we are taught that we won our independence from England, we

actually were able to remain free from the international bankers for

only a few years at the close of the presidency of Andrew Jackson.

The most visible of the power structure was the East India Company

owned by the bankers and the Crown in London, England. This was an

entirely private enterprise whose flag was adopted by Queen Elizabeth

in 1600—thirteen red and white horizontal stripes with a blue

rectangle in its upper left-hand corner. All debts owed before the

war were to be collected by the foreign creditors.



When the creditors of the new nation found the Articles of

Confederation to be inadequate to exact payment from their young

debtor, the Constitution was written and supported by the bankers

through their associates, for increase their control over the United

States of America. Had the Articles of Confederation been completed

and adopted, instead of the Constitution, the bankers would have had

far less control.



Any constitution must have some prior reference to establish its

foundation. The authority for the American Constitution is based

upon the Bible; the Magna Carta, signed in 1215 by King John; the

Petition of Rights, granted by King Charles I in 1628; the English

Bill of Rights, granted by William and Mary in 1689; the right of

habeas corpus, granted by King Charles II, and the Articles of

Confederation. Any and every constitution thereafter must have an

enabling clause. From this point onward, no constitution may

diminish, in any manner, those rights already established in the

above six documents.



The Declaration of Independence established that all people are

sovereign under God's Natural Law. Sovereign people of the various

states, created the state governments for the protection of their

rights. They delegated certain authority from the people's powers by

and through the state constitutions in order that the three branches

of government could properly carry out the dictates outlined in the

State constitutions to protect our rights.



The States then created the United States.



The American Constitution created a new structure of government that

was established on a much higher plane than either the parliamentary

system or the confederation of states. It was a

people's "constitutional republic," where a certain amount of power

was delegated to the states and a certain amount was delegated to the

federal government. The United States, by way of the Congress of the

United States, has certain powers delegated by the Constitution. So

far as the several States party to the Constitution are concerned,

the United States may not exercise power not delegated by the

Constitution. All power not delegated to the United States by the

Constitution is reserved to the several States within their

respective territorial borders—or, to the people.







British Subversion, Banks, and Treason



Even though the Treaty of Paris ended the Revolutionary War in 1783,

the simple fact of our existence threatened the monarchies where it

hurts most: financially. The United States stood as a heroic role

model for other nations, which inspired them to also struggle against

oppressive monarchies. The French Revolution (1789-1799) and the

Polish uprising (1794) were, in part, encouraged by the American

Revolution. Though we stood like a beacon of hope for most of the

world, the monarchies regarded the United States as a political

infection, the principle source of radical democracy that was

destroying monarchies around the world. The monarchies realized that

if the principle source of that infection could be destroyed, the

rest of the world might avoid the contagion and the monarchies would

be saved.



Knowing they couldn't destroy us militarily, they resorted to more

covert methods of political and financial subversion, employing spies

and secret agents skilled in bribery and legal deception; it was

perhaps the first "cold war." In the 1794 Jay Treaty, the United

States agreed to pay £600,000 sterling to King George III, as

reparations for the American Revolution. The US Senate ratified the

treaty in secret session and ordered that it not be published. When

Benjamin Franklin's grandson published it anyway (perhaps our first

whistleblower), the exposure and resulting public up-roar so angered

the Congress that it passed the Alien and Sedition Acts (1798) so

federal judges could prosecute editors and publishers for reporting

the truth about the government.



Since we supposedly had won the Revolutionary War, why would our

Senators agree to pay reparations to the loser? And why would they

agree to pay £600,000 sterling, eleven years after the war ended? It

doesn't make sense, especially in light of the Senate's secrecy and

later fury over being exposed… unless we assume our Senators had been

bribed to serve the British monarchy and betray the American people!

That is treason!



From the beginning, the United States Bank had been opposed by the

Democratic-Republicans lead by Thomas Jefferson, but the Federalists

(the pro-monarchy party) won the vote. The initial capitalization

was $10,000,000 -- 80 % of which would be owned by foreign bankers.

Since the bank was authorized to lend up to $20,000,000 (double its

paid capital), it was a profitable deal for both government and the

bankers, since they could lend, and collect interest on $10,000,000

that didn't exist.



However, the European bankers outfoxed the U.S. government, and by

1796, the US government owed the bank $6,200,000 and was forced to

sell most of its shares. By 1802, our government owned no stock in

the United States Bank!



Thomas Jefferson had warned,



If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue

of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the

banks...will deprive the people of all property until their children

wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.... The

issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the

people, to whom it properly belongs.



Several short-lived attempts to impose the central banking scheme on

the United States were defeated by the patriotic efforts of

Presidents Madison, Jefferson, Jackson, Van Buren and Lincoln.







Bank Fraud, Bribery, and Corruption



Chief among the international financiers was Amshel Bauer of Germany

who, in 1748 opened a goldsmith shop under the name of Red Shield.

(in German the name is spelled Rothschild and is pronounced Rote-

shilld). In 1787, Amshel (Bauer) Rothschild made the famous

statement: "Let me issue and control a Nation's money, and I care not

who writes the laws." He had five Sons Amshel Mayer, Solomon, Jacob,

Nathan, and Carl. In 1798, the five Rothschild brothers expanded by

opening banks in Germany, Vienna, Paris, London, and Naples.



The objective behind this bank was to receive special privilege to

use the unjust fractional reserve banking to print money and loan it

to the government and industry. No money could go into circulation

without interest being paid to the bankers.



Fractional reserve banking is very simple. It is simply a special

privilege given to a man or group of men to create credit out of thin

air; by extending this credit/debt to everyone else in society who

does not have the same privilege, and then collecting from society

the money plus interest, they become very rich without having to

produce anything of value.



The basic mathematics behind this system is very clear. If this

system is left in place long enough, the man or group who controls

this system of debt creation will own all the gold available in the

nation. Once the supply of real money (gold) is in his or their

hands, this man or group of men becomes the master of the entire

nation. Why? Because this man or group of men controls the only

source of operating medium (money) available through which the nation

functions. Only the man who has the privilege of printing the money

and loaning it at interest can determine who gets special funding—his

friends and allies. Everyone else is limited to how much money they

have access to; therefore, after two or three generations, the

friends and allies of this "banker" will own all of the nation—just

as America is now owned by a very small cadre of very wealthy men.



How long this process takes to work its way through the wealth of the

nation depends upon how successful the "banker" is in forcing,

through bribery and corruption, the restriction of the formal

government's issuance of real money backed by gold or silver. As the

supply of real money shrinks, the people of the nation are forced to

rely on the creation of a fictitious debt by the privileged few to a

greater and greater extent, until finally, the only thing left is a

massive amount of "unpayable debt," created from nothing and

consisting only of the interest charged upon the fictitious debt, and

collecting interest for every moment of its existence. All for the

benefit of the privileged, who become the de facto (illegally

usurped) government because of the "money power" they wield.



Through the Bank of England, the Rothschilds demanded a private bank

in the United States to hold the securities of the United States as

the pledged assets to the Crown of England in order to secure the

debt to which our government had defaulted. As one of his first acts,

President Washington declared a financial emergency. William Morris

with the help of Alexander Hamilton, Secretary of Treasury, heavily

promoted the creation a private bank to service the debt to the

international bankers. In 1791, Congress chartered the first national

bank for a term of 20 years, to hold the securities of the same

European bankers who had been holding the debts before the war. The

bankers loaned worthless, un-backed, non-secured printed money to

each other to charter this first bank. In December 12, 1791, the Bank

of the United States opened its doors in Philadelphia.



The holder of the securities was the private bank. So under public

international law, the creditor nation forced the United States to

establish a private bank to hold the securities as the collateral for

the national debt. James Madison had warned, "History records that

the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit,

and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments

by controlling money and its issuance."







British Subversion, Titles of Nobility and Treason



For the early decades of US history, relations between the United

States and Great Britain remained strained. Their relationship

deteriorated sharply with the outbreak of war in Europe in 1803.

Britain imposed a blockade on neutral countries such as the United

States. In addition, the British took American sailors from their

ships and forced them to serve in the British Navy. Concerned about

the many English spies and troublemakers, Congress passed an

amendment to prevent those who had English titles and connections

from obtaining any seat in government. Called the Titles of Nobility

Act (TONA), it reads as follows:



"If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or

retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall without the consent

of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or

emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or

foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United

States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or

profit under them, or either of them."



All "titles of nobility" were prohibited in both Article VI of the

Articles of Confederation (1777) and in Article I, Section 9 of the

Constitution of the United States (1778), but there was no penalty.

Although already prohibited by the Constitution, an additional "title

of nobility" amendment was deemed necessary and was proposed in 1789,

again in 1810, and finally ratified in 1819. But the notice of

ratification delivered to the Secretary of State, an attorney with

the title, "Esquire," disappeared. As a result, there still is no

penalty for accepting titles or emoluments from foreign rulers today,

just the prohibition.



Clearly, the founding fathers saw such a serious threat in "titles of

nobility" and "honours," that anyone receiving them would be required

to forfeit their citizenship. Obviously the Amendment carried much

more significance for our founding fathers than is readily apparent

today. They knew that our freedom could be subverted from inside our

government and had sought to prevent such a bitter betrayal. Today

most Senators and Congressmen, all Federal judges, and some of our

Presidents are attorneys who carry the title "Esquire" often

abbreviated as "Esq." The Constitution still forbids this,

nevertheless.



In Colonial America, attorneys trained attorneys, but most held

no "title of nobility" or "honor." There was no requirement that one

be a lawyer to hold the position of district attorney, attorney

general, or judge; a citizen's "counsel of choice" was not restricted

to a lawyer and there was no state or national bar associations. The

only organization that certified lawyers was the International Bar

Association (IBA), chartered by the King of England, headquartered in

London. Lawyers admitted to the IBA received the rank "Esquire" -

a "title of British nobility."



"Esquire" was the principle title of nobility which the 13th

Amendment ought to prohibit from the United States. Why? Because

the loyalty of "Esquire" lawyers was suspect! Lawyers with

an "Esquire" behind their names were agents of the monarchy, members

of an organization whose principle purposes were political and

regarded with the same wariness that some people today reserve for

members of the KGB or the CIA.



The archaic definition of "honor" (as used when the 13th Amendment

was ratified) meant anyone "obtaining or having an advantage or

privilege over another." A contemporary example of an "honor"

granted to only a few Americans is the privilege of being a judge:

Lawyers can be judges and exercise the attendant privileges and

powers, non-lawyers generally cannot. We address the judge as, "your

Honor."



By prohibiting "honors," the missing, but now found, original 13th

amendment prohibits any advantage or privilege that would grant some

citizens an equal opportunity to achieve or exercise political

power. Therefore, the second meaning (intent) of the original 13th

Amendment was to insure political equality among all American

citizens, by prohibiting anyone, even government officials, from

claiming or exercising a special privilege or power (an "honor") over

other citizens.



Both "esquire" and "honor" would be key targets of the 13th Amendment

even today, because, while "titles of nobility" no longer apply now

precisely as they did back in the early 1800's, it is clear that

an "esquire" or bar attorney receives far better treatment in and by

the courts as well as by the public at large in general, whereas if

you represent yourself (pro se) or speak as a freeman (pro per), you

are treated as though you were rabble. Your opinions are of little

importance in court and you are often treated similarly by government

officials. Because you are not "esquires" or bar attorneys, you are

considered to be a useless eater, a subject "out of control." The

concept of "honor" remains relevant, possibly more so today than at

any previous time in U.S. history, for they, the "honors," are

greatly feared and even revered, even by the esquires who are

considered to be below them. Since the Original 13th Amendment has

never been repealed, all acts of government since 1819 are

technically null and void since most lawmakers, prohibited from

participation in government by the Constitution and who should even

be stripped of their right to be a US Citizen under TONA, have

continued to interject themselves into the political process.



When the people discovered that European banking interests owned most

of the United States Bank they saw the sheer power of the banks and

their ability to influence representative government by economic

manipulation and outright bribery. On February 20, 1811, Congress

therefore refused to renew the Bank's charter on the grounds that the

Bank was unconstitutional. This led to the withdrawal of $7,000,000

in specie (money in coin) by European investors, which in turn,

precipitated an economic recession, and the War of 1812. This "war"

was punishment for America refusing to do business on the terms of

the International Banking families of the House of Rothschild,

through the first Bank of the United States. Congress refused to let

the National Bank renew its Charter.



Except for Gen. Andrew Jackson's victory in the Battle of New

Orleans, the War of 1812 produced a string of American military

disasters. The most shocking of these was the British Army's burning

of the Capitol, the President's house, and other public buildings in

Washington on August 24 and 25, 1814. (Americans had previously

burned public buildings in Canada.) During the War of 1812 our

national archives and many libraries and document repositories were

burned and some of the evidence of the TONA disappeared.

Nevertheless, the legislature of Virginia ratified the amendment and

it was subsequently printed in many official publications as the 13th

Amendment, even in states which had NOT ratified, such as

Connecticut. But beginning in 1832 it began to disappear from texts,

although official state publications continued to publish it as late

as 1876.



There are undoubtedly other examples of the monarchy's efforts to

subvert or destroy the United States; some are common knowledge,

others remain to be disclosed to the public. For example, national

archivist David Dodge discovered a book called 2 VA LAW in the

Library of Congress Law Library. According to Dodge, "This is an un-

catalogued book in the rare book section that reveals a plan to

overthrow the Constitutional government by secret agreements

engineered by the lawyers of the time." That is one of the reasons

why the TONA was ratified by the state of Virginia in the particular

manner in which they did, although the alleged "notification" thereof

was a long time thereafter claimed to have been "lost in the mail."

You see, there is no public record that this aforementioned book

exists either!



That may sound surprising, but according to the Gazette

(5/10/91), "the Library of Congress has 349,402 un-catalogued rare

books and 13.9 million un-catalogued rare manuscripts." There may be

secrets buried in that mass of documents even more astonishing than a

missing Constitutional Amendment. Yet this image of documentary

disarray appropriately describes our situation today: we are

inundated with information that we have not had the time or interest

to sort through. As a result we have lost a precious treasure in the

chaos and turmoil of daily life: our sovereignty.



One amazing aspect of the War of 1812 was the existence of a

depression during wartime. War always brings a short-term prosperity,

except in the case of this war. To understand this, it is vital for

you to know that all depressions and recessions are artificially

created through the restriction of a medium of exchange—money. This

restriction keeps money OUT of circulation. Fewer dollars available

to facilitate production and distribution means poverty and

starvation.



The precariousness of government finance during the war and the post

war recession convinced the Republican government under James

Madison, to re-establish a national bank. Thus was created the Second

Bank of the United States in 1816.



In January 9, 1832 The Second National Bank applied for a charter

renewal 4 years early. This time President Andrew Jackson vetoed the

Bank's recharter on the grounds that the Bank was unconstitutional

and he successfully paid off the national debt leaving the U.S. with

a surplus of $5,000. He said, "If congress has the right under the

Constitution to issue paper money, it was given them to use

themselves, not to be delegated to individuals or corporations."



On January 30, 1835, President Andrew Jackson attended a

congressional funeral in the Capitol building. As he exited, Richard

Lawrence, an unemployed house painter, pointed a pistol at Jackson

and fired. The percussion cap exploded, but the bullet did not

discharge. The enraged Jackson raised his cane to strike his

attacker, who fired again. The second weapon also misfired and the

sixty-seven-year-old president escaped assassination at close range.

Jackson was convinced that Lawrence was hired by his political

enemies, the Whigs, to stop his plan to destroy the Bank of the

United States.



Andrew Jackson violated public international law because he denied

the creditor his just lien rights on the debtor. However, the

bankers did not lend value (substance), so in actuality they had an

unperfected lien. Therefore the law actually did not apply.







The End of the American Republic: the Shadow Government is Born



In 1860-61, the Southern states walked out of Congress. This created

sine die, a situation in which not enough representatives were

present to carry on legislative business. This was a constitutional

crisis that the newly elected president, Abraham Lincoln, had to

resolve.



The Introduction to Senate Report 93-549 (93rd Congress, 1st Session,

1973) summarizes the situation as best as possible:



"A majority of the people of the United States have lived all of

their lives under emergency rule. . . And, in the United States,

actions taken by the Government in times of great crises have –from,

at least, the Civil War—in important ways, shaped the present

phenomenon of a permanent state of national emergency."



From the research information available, it can be reasonably proven

that when the Southern states walked out of Congress on March 27,

1861, the quorum to conduct business under the Constitution for the

united States of America was lost. Thus, the only votes that Congress

could lawfully take, under parliamentary law, were those to set the

time to reconvene, take a vote to get a quorum, vote to adjourn and

set a date, time, and place to reconvene at a later time, but

instead, Congress apparently abandoned the House and Senate without

setting a date to reconvene. Under the parliamentary law of Congress,

when this happened, Congress became sine die (pronounced see-na dee-

a; literally "without day") and thus when Congress adjourned sine

die, it ceased to exist as a lawful deliberative body, and thus the

only lawful, constitutional power that could declare war was no

longer lawful, or in session.



It can also be reasonably proven that the Southern states, by virtue

of their secession from the Union, also ceased to exist sine die, and

that some state legislatures in the Northern bloc also adjourned sine

die, and thus, all the states which were parties to creating the

Constitution for the united States of America apparently ceased to

exist. On April 15, 1861, President Lincoln executed an executive

order, Lincoln Executive Proclamation 1, and it can also be

reasonably proven that the united States of America have been ruled

ever since by the President under executive powers.



It can also be reasonably proven that when Congress eventually did

reconvene, it was reconvened under the military authority of the

Commander-in-Chief and not by Rules of Order for Parliamentary bodies

or by Constitutional Law, thus placing the American people under

martial rule ever since the "national emergency" declared by

President Lincoln. Thus, the Constitution for the united States of

America has subsequently temporarily ceased being the acknowledged

law of the land in many courts, and the President, Congress, and the

courts have unlawfully presumed that they were free to remake the

Union in a new image, whereas, lawfully, no constitutional provisions

were in place which afforded power to any of the actions which were

taken which presumed to place the Union under the new form of

control.



President Lincoln apparently knew that his executive orders no longer

had any force under Constitutional Law. So he commissioned General

Orders No. 100 (April 24, 1863) apparently as a special code to

govern his actions under martial law and to justify the seizure of

power, which further extended the laws of the District of Columbia

and which also fictionally implemented the provisions of Article I,

Section 8, Clauses 17-18 of the Constitution beyond the boundaries of

Washington, D.C. and into the several states. General Orders No. 100,

also called the Lieber Instructions and the Lieber Code, have

apparently extended the laws of war and private international law

into the American states, and the United States government has become

the presumed military conqueror of the people and the land of the

several American nations.



Martial rule has apparently been kept secret and has never really

ended. Lincoln was assassinated before he could complete the

implementation of his plan to constitutionally and not militarily

reform the Southern national governments and restore Congress. Ever

since the united States of America has been ruled under military law

under the Commander of Chief—the President—and his assumed executive

powers according to the policies of Executive Orders: a military

dictator type function.



Constitutional law under the original Constitution for the American

states is apparently enforced only as a matter of keeping the public

peace under the provisions of General Orders No. 100 under martial

rule. This "peace" is further evidenced in the Preamble of the so-

called Expatriation Act of 1868. Under martial law, title is a mere

fiction, since all property belongs to the military except for that

property which the Commander-in-Chief may, in his benevolence, exempt

from taxation and seizure and upon which he allows the "enemy" to

reside.



In proclaiming the first Trading with the Enemy Act by Executive

Order, President Lincoln set in place the means by which the federal

government could interact with Americans who were not 14th Amendment

citizens. They could technically be designated as enemies. Are you

beginning to understand how We the People could be at odds with

our "government?"



In a message to Congress December 3, 1861, Abraham Lincoln answered

the banker's argument that the people could not be trusted with their

constitutional power, the political and monetary system of free

enterprise conceived by our Founding Fathers, by saying:



"No men living are more worthy to be trusted than those who toil up

from poverty -- none less inclined to take or touch aught which they

have not honestly earned. Let them beware of surrendering a political

power which they already possess, and which if surrendered, will

surely be used to close the door of advancement against such as they,

and to fix new disabilities and burdens upon them, till all of

liberty shall be lost."



In 1865, just before the close of the Civil War, President Lincoln

declared his new monetary policy:



"The Government should create, issue, and circulate all the currency

and credits needed to satisfy the spending power of the Government

and the buying power of consumers. By the adoption of these

principles, the taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest.

Money will cease to be master and become the servant of humanity….

The privilege of creating and issuing money is not only the supreme

prerogative of government, but it is the governments' greatest

opportunity."



Had it been implemented, it would have ushered in a worldwide

economic renewal. Unfortunately, a few weeks after its introduction,

Lincoln was assassinated because he defied the bankers in proposing

to print interest free money to pay the war debt. Thus, the

government continued to operate fully under the authority of private

law dictated by the creditor.



Since President Lincoln was assassinated before he could complete

plans for reforming constitutional government in the Southern States

and end the martial rule by executive order, the 14th Amendment to

the Constitution has further created a "new citizenship" or "status"

for the expanded jurisdiction. Laws for the District of Columbia were

proposed and passed by Congress in 1871, the District of Columbia

being incorporated as a private, foreign corporation by The District

of Columbia Organic Act of 1871, and all states in the Union were

apparently reformed as franchisees or political subdivisions of the

corporation known as the UNITED STATES, hence creating a new union of

American states. What remained of the government was the private side

under the rule of the bankers.



The first attempt by Congress to define citizenship was in 1866 in

the passage of the Civil Rights Act (Revised Statutes section 1992, 8

United States Code Annotated section 1). The act provided that:



"All persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign

power are declared to be citizens of the United States."



And this in turn was followed in 1868 by the adoption of the

Fourteenth Amendment, United States Code Annotated Amendment 14,

declaring:



"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to

the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of

the State wherein they reside."



At this period of time, the only people in the United States who were

under the jurisdiction of the private bifurcated government of the

ten miles square of Washington, D.C., were the government employees,

those within the territories owned by the United States and now the

former slaves. The former citizens of the South, now "captured"

became 14th Amendment citizens. The remainder of the people could

still invoke the power over government through original jurisdiction

of the Republic side of the Constitution.



A new 13th Amendment was enacted December 18, 1865 and the 14th

Amendment was enacted July 28, 1868. It was ratified in Southern

states under martial law. A state could only obtain its freedom from

federal military rule by ratifying this amendment. Any contract

entered under duress is null and void. But then the Constitution was

not even in effect following sine die and the proclamation of martial

law.



The 14th Amendment brought the freed slaves, whose previous owners

were private plantations and transferred those slaves under

subjection of the government, the ten miles square jurisdiction of

Washington, D.C. And it offered its protection to those who would

choose to become its subjects…in exchange for their sovereignty.



The 14th Amendment is a good example of the "give-a-little, take a

lot" strategy that is often used, a sugar coating to a bitter pill.

Sovereign Citizens had created a government to guarantee them their

rights. In contrast, the federal government created fourteenth

amendment citizenship to guarantee its power over its citizens. It

seems to be taking citizens under its protection but at the price of

servitude. Sovereigns may choose to become subjects; free men and

women to become vassals. This amendment has always been

controversial. Many people over the years have questioned the amount

of power it vests in the federal government. Some have even

questioned its validity. On one occasion Judge Ellett of the Utah

Supreme Court remarked:



"I cannot believe that any court, in full possession of its

faculties, could honestly hold that the amendment was properly

approved and adopted. State v. Phillips, Pacific Reporter, 2nd

Series, Vol. 540, Page 941, 942 (1975)



However, the most important fact about this amendment is that,

although it created a new class of citizen, it did not have any

effect on Sovereign Citizens. Both classes still exist: When the

Constitution was adopted the people of the United States were the

citizens of the several States for whom and for whose posterity the

government was established. Each of them was a citizen of the United

States at the adoption of the Constitution, and all free persons

thereafter born within one of the several States became by birth

citizens of the State and of the United States.



Both classes of citizen still exist. It's your right to be a

Sovereign Citizen, while it's a privilege to be a fourteenth

amendment citizen, and most importantly, it's up to you to determine

which one you are, and which one you want to be. Just remember that

you "pay" for a privilege, whereas a right carries no obligation.

This is at the heart of your personal Declaration of Independence.







Two Governments, Two Flags: the Corporate State



Once the smoke settled after the Civil War, European international

bankers arrived in town. In 1871 the default again loomed and

bankruptcy was imminent. So in 1872, the ten miles square District

of Columbia was incorporated in England. A loophole was discovered

in the Constitution by cunning lawyers in league with the

international bankers. They realized that a separate nation by the

same name existed that Congress had created in Article I, Section 8,

Clause 17.



The Congress shall have power:



To exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such

district (not exceeding ten square miles) as may, by cession of

particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of

government of the United States, and to exercise like authority over

all places purchased by the consent of the legislature of the state

in which the same shall be, for the erection of forts, magazines,

arsenals, dock yards, and other needful buildings; - And



To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying

into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by

this constitution in the government of the United States, or in any

department or officer thereof.



This "United States" is a Legislative "Democracy" within the

Constitutional Republic, and is known as the Federal United States.

It has exclusive, unlimited rule over its Citizenry, the residents of

the District of Colombia, the territories and enclaves (Guam, Midway

Islands, Wake Island, Puerto Rico, etc.), and anyone who is a Citizen

by way of the 14th Amendment (naturalized Citizens).



Both United States have the same Congress that rules in both nations.

One "United States," the Republic of fifty States, has the "stars and

stripes" as its flag, but without any fringe on it. The Federal

United States' flag is the stars and stripes with a yellow fringe,

seen in all the courts. The abbreviations of the States of the

Continental United States are, with or without the zip codes, Ala.,

Alas., Ariz., Ark., Cal., etc. The abbreviations of the States under

the jurisdiction of the Federal United States, the Legislative

Democracy, are AL, AK, AZ, AR, CA, etc. (without any periods).



The international bankers and the Congress conjured up this bit of

mischief and passed it into law. But whose law? Congress broke faith

with We the People in 1871 and sold us out when they formed a private

corporation and made it the government of the District of Columbia.

They used the Constitution through the 14th Amendment, as their by-

laws, therefore taking their authority not under the Constitution but

taking their authority over the constitution. They copyrighted not

only the constitution but also many related names such as, THE UNITED

STATES, U.S. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, USA as their own. This is

the final blow to the original constitution. Hence forth, the UNITED

STATES has been governed entirely by private corporate law, dictated

by the banks as creditors.



The "Act to Provide a Government for the District of Columbia,"

Section 34 of the Forty-First Congress of the United States, Session

III, Chapter 61 and 62, enacted February 21, 1871, states that the

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is a corporation, whose jurisdiction is

applicable only in the ten-mile-square parcel of land known as the

District of Columbia and to whatever properties are legally titled to

the UNITED STATES, by its registration in the corporate County,

State, and Federal governments that are under military power of the

UNITED STATES and its creditors. Under this provision, the military

Congress of the UNITED STATES had obtained the power to pass private

international law for application within the federal District of

Columbia. All States of the Union adopted new legislatively

created 'conditions' and 'codified' their laws under federal

mandate. State 'codes' were unlawfully adopted despite their origin

as instruments of sovereign people. However, We the People remained

sovereign.



UNITED STATES CODE, Title 28, 3002(15)(A), basically reiterates that

the UNITED STATES is a corporation. What was not said in 1871, but

was implicit, was what is plainly stated at Title 28, 3002(15)(3):

That all departments of the UNITED STATES CORPORATION are part of the

corporation. Title 28, UNITED STATES CODE, is Copyrighted Private

International Law. Indeed, the UNITED STATES CODE, in its entirety,

is Copyrighted Private International Law, and applicable only in the

District of Columbia.



This incorporation was first reported by Gary W. Phillips, whose

career with the Immigration and Naturalization Service began in 1956.

He was the INS director at Sea Tac Airport for 20 years and began

challenging the income tax in 1985 (The Idaho Observer, March, 2000).

After nearly 40 years of government service, Phillips was forced to

flee his country to protect his life after exposing the facts of the

illegality of the federal government's criminal income tax collection

scam -- facts that are becoming well know among informed people

throughout the country.



Where did the Congress find the authority in the Constitution to

reconstitute any part of the united States as a corporation? Quite

simply, the 1791 Constitution was set aside to make room for the

corporation. Would this Act benefit the Republic? No, the private,

corporate bottom line is profit. The municipal, public bottom line is

service. To replace our service-oriented form of government with a

profit-oriented form of government without our knowledge or consent

can only be described as treason.



A few superficial changes were made to the original Constitution and

it was no longer the real thing. Congress did not change the name of

the document so they could claim to be reading from the Constitution.

They merely changed it from the Constitution for the united States of

America to the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. They

changed the "for" to "of'" and capitalized all the letters. All of

the sudden we had two Constitutions, the original for show and the

revision for actual use.



The Act of 1871 provided a government for the District of Columbia

and created a corporation entitled the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA whose

jurisdiction extends only over corporate entities created by the

municipal corporation and operative only in the District of Columbia.

Washington, District of Columbia is the capitol of the District of

Columbia, not the United States of America, and all laws passed

within the District of Columbia are applicable and enforceable only

in the District of Columbia and it's possessions.



The States of the Republic are not possessions of the District of

Columbia. Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands and Guam are possessions of

the District of Columbia as well as property legally titled to the

UNITED STATES by states and counties.



The UNITED STATES CODE, in totality, was put together in the District

of Columbia as Copyrighted Private International Law and is

applicable only in the District of Columbia. By their own rules of

jurisdiction, the UNITED STATES attorneys have no business

prosecuting anyone outside of the District of Columbia or Federal

territories. The federal court has no venue outside of the District

of Columbia and, therefore, has no jurisdiction outside of the

District of Columbia and its possessions. The Congress cannot pass a

law that is applicable in the several States of the Republic.



If all the laws passed in the District of Columbia are Private

International Law, including all of the UNITED STATES CODE and the

statutes at large passed after 1871, and are applicable and

enforceable only in the District of Columbia, then how could they

have become the law of the land? Because, not knowing better, We the

People allowed it. We have allowed agents of foreign countries to

build an illegal corporation that has systematically corrupted every

state, county and city in this nation and corrupted the status and

standing of most people of the united States of America. The only way

that a UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT can have jurisdiction over a

Sovereign is if the latter volunteers to the jurisdiction or fails to

declare his independence as a Sovereign.



This corporation has created dozens of agencies, the IRS, FBI, DEA,

and the BATF, to name a few, which employ thousands of agents who

receive excellent salaries and benefits for betraying their friends

and families while enforcing the private edicts of the so-called

Congress. The men and women of Congress smile, speak softly, and then

direct their illegal agencies to destroy those who do not fully

conform to their wishes, and strike fear into hearts of those who do.

Kidnapping and conspiracy are involved in every arrest and conviction

by federal authorities outside of the District of Columbia.



The question now leads to whether our duly elected public officials

swear an oath to uphold the Constitution for the united States of

America, the Republic within which our rights are protected by a

service-oriented government, or swear an oath to the CONSTITUTION OF

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, the profit-oriented corporation?



It appears by their actions that most government employees, knowingly

or unknowingly, have sworn an oath to the corporate UNITED STATES. It

is our duty as the People who elected them into office, to demand

accountability from our "public" officials and confront them as to

where their loyalties lie. Is it with the corrupt, treasonous

corporation that is controlled by foreign agents from within and

without, or is it with our constitutional Republic, the united States

of America and her citizens?



An articulate defender of a conservative monetary policy, President

James A. Garfield urged the resumption of specie payments and the

payment of government debts. He said, "Whoever controls the volume

of money in any country is absolute master of all industry and

commerce." In his Inaugural Address in 1881, Garfield said:



The chief duty of the National Government in connection with the

currency of the country is to coin money and declare its value. Grave

doubts have been entertained whether Congress is authorized by the

Constitution to make any form of paper money legal tender. The

present issue of United States notes has been sustained by the

necessities of war; but such paper should depend for its value and

currency upon its convenience in use and its prompt redemption in

coin at the will of the holder, and not upon its compulsory

circulation. These notes are not money, but promises to pay money. If

the holders demand it, the promise should be kept.



Garfield was assassinated after only two hundred days in office, 80

days after being shot by a lawyer, ostensibly because he was upset

about not receiving an ambassadorial posting to France.



In 1909, default loomed once again. The US government asked the

Crown of England for an extension of time. This extension was

granted for another 20 years on several conditions. One of the

conditions was that the United States permit the creditors to

establish a new national bank. The bankers moved deeper into our

nation by the establishment of the Federal Reserve Bank in 1913, the

IRS to collect the interest on their loans made to the UNITED STATES,

and the 17th Amendment enacted May 31, 1913, was the condition for

the extension of time. The 16th and 17th Amendment further reduced

the states power. The UNITED STATES adopted the mercantile system of

ancient Babylonian.



With the passage of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, the UNITED

STATES was firmly lashed to the yoke, so that a small number of very

rich men have been able to lay upon the people a yoke little better

than slavery itself. That yoke inevitably grows heavier with ever-

compounding interest, and totals over $20 trillion of debt owed by

the American people today ($80,000 per American). This vast

accumulation of wealth concentrates immense power and despotic

economic domination in the hands of the few central bankers "who are

able to govern credit and its allotment, for this reason supplying,

so to speak, the life-blood to the entire economic body, and

grasping, as it were, in their hands the very soul of the economy so

that no one dare breathe against their will." A worldwide tyranny is

gradually being imposed, hidden to most, by the money masters.







First World War



In 1917 we were drafted into the First World War. President Woodrow

Wilson had to find a way to persuade the American public to go along

with an intervention in another of Europe's wars. Although

restrained to be neutral in the deadly conflict by the Neutrality

Act, he sent our navy to shepherd British convoys across the

Atlantic. German U-boat commanders did not take the bait and avoided

contact with the US destroyers. To force the issue, a US naval ship

sailed into the midst of a battle between British and German naval

fleets and was sunk. But when the truth was learned, Wilson had to

find another way.



The Lusitania was a speedy warship refitted by the British as a

passenger liner. Unknown to its passengers the Lusitania was

carrying a huge cargo of military equipment and munitions in

violation of the US Neutrality Act. The Germans knew that and tried

to warn the passengers by placing advertisements in prominent US

newspapers. The US State Department ordered all of the newspapers to

refuse the ad. Only one newspaper in Des Moines, Iowa, bravely

published the information. To ensure a successful provocation, the

Lusitania was ordered to sail at 75% speed using only three of its

four powerful engines. Then the naval escort was ordered away

leaving the Lusitania vulnerable as it entered the war zone. The

first torpedo hit the explosive cargo and blew the bottom out of the

Lusitania. It sank in only 18 minutes. 126 innocent civilians died.

Wilson now had his provocation to rally Americans behind the "War to

End All Wars."



The US participation in WWI exacerbated the national debt so that it

became impossible for us to pay it off in 1929. It also enhanced the

War Powers Act that President Lincoln, by Executive Order put in

place during his Presidency. This War Powers Act was re-enforced and

the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917 was passed to define,

regulate, and punish those who were trading with enemies, who were

then required by that act to be licensed by the government to do

business. This will become more important later on.







The Great Depression: From Sovereignty to Servitude



We all know what happened in 1929. This was the year of the stock

market crash and the beginning of The Great Depression. The stock

market crash moved billions of dollars from the people to the banks.

This also removed cash from circulation for the people's use. Those

who still possessed any cash, invested in high interest yielding

Treasury Bonds driven higher by increased demand. As a result, even

more cash was removed from circulation in the general public to the

point where there was not enough cash left in circulation to buy the

goods being produced. Production came to a halt as excess inventory

overwhelmed the market. There were more products on the market than

there was cash to buy them. Prices plummeted and industries plunged

into bankruptcy, throwing millions of people out of work.

Foreclosures on homes, factories, businesses and farms rose to the

highest level in the history of America. A mere dime was literally

salvation to many families now living on the street. Millions of

people lost everything they had, keeping only the clothes on their

backs.



In Europe, the International Bankers in 1930 declared several nations

bankrupt, including the United States. In 1933, immediately after

Franklin Delano Roosevelt took office, his first act as President was

to publicly declare the United States bank holiday. He further went

on to issue his Presidential Executive Order on March 5th, 1933 that

all United States Citizens must turn in all their gold in return for

Federal Reserve Notes. This was passed into law by Congress on June

5, 1933.



We the People turned in all our gold at that time. Why? Were we

United States Citizens? No. We were still a sovereign people until

that time. We just thought that we were required to turn in all our

gold. Only those people living in Washington, D.C., and the 14th

Amendment Citizens were so required. As sovereigns, we were not

under the jurisdiction of the United States of America, which

incorporated in 1872.



When we turned in our gold, we just volunteered to be citizens of the

jurisdiction of the ten miles square of Washington D.C. and their

laws. We became 14th Amendment Citizens. Our birth certificates, the

title to our bodies, were registered at the Department of Commercial.

This title to our bodies, all of our property and all of our future

labor, was pledged to the International Bankers as security for the

money owed in bankruptcy. This was done under the authority of

commercial law (Babylonian law) by and through Title. The American

People were not in bankruptcy. Only the Corporate UNITED STATES was

in bankruptcy. But with the US Corporation holding the title to your

body and life, you could be used for collateral to secure the

national debt through the birth certificate given by parents

voluntarily to be entered into the Commercial Registry. This act, in

commerce, gave Title to your body by way of a "constructive"

contract.



Next, the government created an artificial 'person' in your name, a

corporation, a fictitious entity to take its place in a virtual

reality of contract law and corporations. By and through an adhesion

contract, the government then made you, the real man or woman,

responsible for that fictional entity, a fiduciary and surety for an

artificial entity. Your artificial entity secured the National debt

and through it, you became a 14th Amendment Citizen of the UNITED

STATES. In other words, they got you to think and act as though you

really were that fictional entity. You agreed by your action or

failure to act. YOU adhered to a contract offer because you thought

or acted as though you were the receiver of the offer. In doing so,

YOU were presumed to have ACCEPTED THE CONTRACT.



All licenses and all existing contracts are made between the UNITED

STATES or THE STATE OF (whatever state you live in) and your

artificial entity. That fictitious entity binds you to the UNITED

STATES and its sub-corporations because they have, through adhesion

contract, made you, the real man or woman, fiduciary and responsible

for that artificial entity. Of course, you voluntarily sign, and

even request, all those contracts, don't you? It seems to be your

name, although you probably never spell it all in capital letters as

they do. They wish for you to think nothing of the aberration,

perhaps just something they do to be clear and error-free.



All of these contracts you sign carry with it your agreement to obey

and uphold all the laws, rules and regulations passed by the Congress

of the UNITED STATES CORPORATION and THE STATE OF. . . . and will be

enforced against you.



From that day forward, We the People, once upon a time sovereigns who

created government for our convenience and welfare, could never own

property in allodium because the state now had possession of it all.

In 1964, the state obtained title to all private property. You can

only "rent" homes that you believe you own by paying taxes. You only

have a certificate of title to the car you think you own, and you

continue to drive it because of your yearly fee. The state owns the

true title to our homes, our cars, to everything we thought or think

we own. You married the state through your marriage license and your

children became wards of the state. All of this was pledged,

including all the fruits of your future labor, to the bankers as

security against the national debt and was placed in the possession

of the Secretary of State of each state as an agent for the Trustee

of the Bankruptcy, the U.S. Secretary of Treasury. Not knowing the

rules of the game you went directly to jail, you could not pass GO

and you could not collect $200.







Cows in the Pasture or Freedom: the Hidden Choice



The way out of this is dilemma can be very complex. In fact, its

complexity was intentional. Roosevelt had violated the law by

placing us into servitude without our consent. Congressman Louis T.

McFadden brought formal charges against the Federal Reserve and the

Secretary of the Treasury and was coming dangerously close to calling

for impeachment of Franklin D. Roosevelt. Two months AFTER the

Executive Order, on June 5, 1933, the Senate and House of

Representatives, 73d Congress, 1st Session, at 4:30 pm approved House

Joint Resolution (HJR) 192: Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold

Standard And Abrogate The Gold Clause, Joint Resolution to assure

uniform value to the coins and currencies of the United States, which

formally declared the bankruptcy of the UNITED STATES.



F.D.R. by Executive Order declared the people outside federal

territories to be the enemy by illegally altering the Trading with

the Enemy Act of 1861, revised 1918.



The creation of Federal Zone citizenship further tightened up when

you applied for your Social Security number after 1935. The benefits

offered by this contract were hurriedly and voluntarily entered into

when the Social Security Act was signed into law. Further contracts

were to be entered into and license to be applied for–all voluntary

actions. We unknowingly were entering into lifelong servitude to

receive the benefits of the Lord of the Manor. We had descended into

feudal vassalage without recognizing it.



President Roosevelt then called all the Governors into Washington D.

C. for a conference. This was the beginning of the states losing the

remainder of their sovereignty. It was not until 1944 that the

corporate states lost all their power over the corporate United

States with the Buck Act. With this Act, the states became,

essentially, 14th Amendment Citizens as well. This completed the

destruction of the corporate states having any power to protect

against usurpation by the U.S. Government. The corporate states went

under the jurisdiction of Washington, D.C.



Strangely enough, on October 28, 1977, HJR-192 was quietly repealed

by public law 95-147. The joint resolution entitled "Joint resolution

to assure uniform value to the coins and currencies of the United

States" approved June 5, 1933 (31 U.S.C. 463), shall not apply to

obligations issued on or after the date of enactment of this section.



The reason for the repeal of HJR-192 is somewhat obscure. After 44

years of unchallenged implementation, this public policy is clearly

established by custom, usage and participation in the credit system

by the American public. Those of us operating on the privilege of

limited liability, via the public credit, are still bound.



The adoption of the Uniform Commercial Code by all States in 1964 and

a number of other like laws and Acts were incorporated into this

nation. This made the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), the Supreme Law

of the Land.







Courts Shift from Common Law to Equity and Admiralty Courts



Under the Constitution, based on Common Law, the Republic of the

Continental United States provides for legal cases: at Law, in

Equity, and in Admiralty.



(1) Law is the collective organization of the individual right to

lawful defense. It is the will of the majority, the organization of

the natural right of lawful defense. It is the substitution of a

common force for individual forces, to do only what the individual

forces have a natural and lawful right to do: to protect persons,

liberties, and properties; to maintain the right of each, and to

cause justice to reign over us all. Since an individual cannot

lawfully use force against the person, liberty, or property of

another individual, then the common force—for the same reason—cannot

lawfully be used to destroy the person, liberty, or property of

individuals or groups. Law allows you to do anything you want to, as

long as you don't infringe upon the life, liberty or property of

anyone else. Law does not compel performance.



Today's so-called laws (ordinances, statutes, acts, regulations,

orders, precepts, etc.) are often erroneously perceived as law, but

just because something is called a "law" does not necessarily make it

a law. [There is a difference between "legal" and "lawful." Anything

the government does is legal, but it may not be lawful.]



(2) Equity is the jurisdiction of compelled performance (for any

contract you are a party to) and is based on what is fair in a

particular situation. The term "equity" denotes the spirit and habit

of fairness, justness, and right dealing which would regulate the

intercourse of men with men. You have no rights other than what is

specified in your contract. Equity has no criminal aspects to it.



(3) Admiralty is compelled performance plus a criminal penalty, a

civil contract with a criminal penalty.



By 1938 the gradual merger procedurally between law and equity

actions (i.e., the same court has jurisdiction over legal, equitable,

and admiralty matters) was recognized. The nation was bankrupt and

was owned by its creditors (the international bankers) who now owned

everything—the Congress, the Executive, the courts, all the States

and their legislatures and executives, all the land, and all the

people. Everything was mortgaged in the national debt. We had gone

from being sovereigns over government to subjects under government,

through the use of negotiable instruments to discharge our debts with

limited liability, instead of paying our debts at common law with

gold or silver coin.



The change in our system of law from public law to private commercial

law was recognized by the Supreme Court of the United States in the

Erie Railroad vs. Thompkins case of 1938, after which case, in the

same year, the procedures of Law were officially blended with the

procedures of Equity. Prior to 1938, all U.S. Supreme Court decisions

were based upon public law—or that system of law that was controlled

by Constitutional limitation. Since 1938, all U.S. Supreme Court

decisions are based upon what is termed public policy.



Public policy concerns commercial transactions made under the

Negotiable Instrument's Law, which is a branch of the international

Law Merchant. This has been codified into what is now known as the

Uniform Commercial Code, which system of law was made uniform

throughout the fifty States through the cunning of the Congress of

the UNITED STATES.



In offering grants of negotiable paper (Federal Reserve Notes) which

the Congress gave to the fifty States of the Union for education,

highways, health, and other purposes, Congress bound all the States

of the Union into a commercial agreement with the Federal United

States (as distinguished from the Continental United States). The

fifty States accepted the "benefits" offered by the Federal United

States as the consideration of a commercial agreement between the

Federal United States and each of the corporate States. The corporate

States were then obligated to obey the Congress of the Federal United

States and also to assume their portion of the equitable debts of the

Federal United States to the international banking houses, for the

credit loaned. The credit which each State received, in the form of

federal grants, was predicated upon equitable paper.



This system of negotiable paper binds all corporate entities of

government together in a vast system of commercial agreements and is

what has altered our court system from one under the Common Law to a

Legislative Article I Court, or Tribunal, system of commercial law.

Those persons brought before this court are held to the letter of

every statute of government on the federal, state, county, or

municipal levels unless they have exercised the REMEDY provided for

them within that system of Commercial Law whereby, when forced to use

a so-called "benefit" offered, or available, to them, from

government, they may reserve their former right, under the Common Law

guarantee of same, not to be bound by any contract, or commercial

agreement, that they did not enter knowingly, voluntarily, and

intentionally. See Howard Freeman here:

http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/freeman/freeman4.htm



In 1976, Congress took away any semblance of law or justice left

within our court system. All law today is now construed, constructed

and made up by the judge as it happens before your very eyes. Common

law has almost disappeared from the courts. They took away any

control or authority we might have had over the court system. This

has been very well hidden from all of us.



Many of us going into court often wonder why and how the courts can

simply override the laws we put into our paperwork. It's very simple

now that we know how they do it. They operate on the words `construe

and construct.'



A simple word such as `in' changed to `at' as in `at law' or `in law'

has a totally separate meaning. For example: If you're in the

river, you are wet, you can swim, etc., but if you're at the river,

you might enjoy a refreshing picnic, play baseball or run races. See

the difference a simple word can make? And, the attorneys often

change this word when they answer your motions – in addition to many

others.



It will pay you in dividends to read the answers of attorneys to your

paperwork. Compare what they say the case law says to the actual

case law itself. You'll discover that they have actually changed the

words therein. This is illegal, you might say. No, not, according to

the US Code.



You see, they can now construe and construct any law or statute to

mean whatever they decide it means, for their benefit. You don't

know any of this. You think they are railroading you in a kangaroo

court. No, they are `legal' in what they do. They usually follow

the law to the letter; Their law, private law, the law of contract,

that you know nothing about. This law is called contract law.







Uniform Commercial Code: Contract Acceptance and Honor



If you don't understand contract law or realize what law you are

dealing with when you go into court, you will lose. Even if you have

filed your UCC-1 and have captured your Title and your artificial

entity, this makes no difference in the above courts. Why? They

operate in total fiction, in the land of Oz. They can only recognize

contracts. And you are a real sentient being. (Still with numerous

adhesion contracts attached to you). Whatever you file in that court,

whether it is your UCC-1 or Law from the Judicial and Original

Jurisdiction side, that is real, Lawful, truth. They do not

recognize truth of any sort. They only recognize fiction and contract

law. So, when you go into any court, be aware that it is their law,

that the judge or the prosecutor can `construe' and `construct' that

law in any fashion they choose. It will always mean what they choose

it to mean.



So, are the courts bound by the Constitution? Law? Statutes? No,

contracts only and the statutes used to enforce the contracts.



When used in conjunction with one's signature, a stamp

stating "Without Prejudice U.C.C. 1-207" is sufficient to indicate to

the magistrate of any of our present Legislative Tribunals

(called "courts") that the signer of the document has reserved his

Common Law right. He is not to be bound to the statute, or commercial

obligation, of any commercial agreement that he did not enter

knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally, as would be the case in

any Common Law contract.



Furthermore, pursuant to U.C.C. 1-103, the statute being enforced as

a commercial obligation of a commercial agreement, must now be

construed in harmony with the old Common Law of America, where the

tribunal/court must rule that the statute does not apply to the

individual who is wise enough and informed enough to exercise the

remedy provided in this new system of law. He retains his former

status in the Republic and fully enjoys his unalienable rights,

guaranteed to him by the Constitution of the Republic, while those

about him "curse the darkness" of Commercial Law government, lacking

the truth needed to free themselves from a slave status under the

Federal United States, even while inhabiting territory foreign to its

territorial venue. Howard Freeman







Summary of Historical Development of Modern Feudalism



THE UNITED STATES as a corporation, created in England, came under

the jurisdiction of England. This entitled England to create laws as

England saw fit to do, establish those laws in THE UNITED STATES and

everyone who at that time was a 14th Amendment Citizen were subject

to obey those laws. This also placed the Congress of THE UNITED

STATES above that portion of what we think is the constitution, not

under the authority of the constitution. Copyrighted, remember? The

only Bill of Rights left at this point in time is four Amendments --

13th, 14th 15th, and 16th. That is all the Courts are required to

take cognizance of when you appear in their courts.



The 1929 stock market crash and the Great Depression that followed

placed the American people in desperation, homelessness, poverty and

even starvation. The minds of the people were focused on survival.

They were then in a condition to accept any handout given by the

government, no matter what the cost to their

freedoms.



We were drawn in as 14th Amendment Citizens through the registration

of our birth certificates. We were further enticed deeper into that

system by volunteering for many other licenses and privileges given

by the government. We were also made enemies of THE UNITED STATES.

This act gave the UNITED STATES authority, under the laws of war and

as a captured people, to force anything on us they choose to create.



Then, in 1976, Congress removed any semblance of justice in our court

system with Senate bill 94-201 and 94-381. From this point forward,

the 'officers of the court' can construe and construct the laws to

mean anything they chose them to mean.



As 14th Amendment Citizens, we are not citizens of the America we

have always thought. We are actually citizens of England, through

the corporation of THE UNITED STATES.



There is no law today except as fiction of copyrighted statutes, to

be interpreted by 'judges' who construe and construct whatever they

choose to have those statutes mean.



We, as sovereigns irresponsibly recognized the Crown of England (IMF)

as PRINCIPLE of America. In reality, the IMF was the Creditor of the

UNITED STATES, a corporation, but NEVER you. The Creditor of the

UNITED STATES designed invisible contracts to ensnare the sovereign

people of America as subjects. The Creditor of the UNITED STATES

implemented the invisible contracts through apparent 'color of law'

and the sovereigns irresponsibly agreed. We, as Sovereigns, through

the invisible contracts, and our irresponsibility to reject the

Creditors (IMF) ideas, have voluntarily given our substance to the

mythical creator of our situation.



You'll find that there is a common thread woven throughout our entire

history and that thread is commerce, the merchant, the money-changer

(banks), the law merchant, i.e., the law of commerce, civil law and

maritime law. This is not to say that commerce is bad. It does,

however, say that commerce brings with it the laws of commerce.

Wherever commerce goes it brings laws that can bind people into

slavery. This can happen only if the people agree with it.



Banks create "money" today out of thin air; then, they charge, we,

the people, interest on their creation. This can happen only if the

people agree with it. Thereafter, the merchants and the bankers

create laws, through lawmakers whom they control, that protect

commerce and bind the people to obey. This can happen only if the

people agree with it.



The only reason this occurs is that we do not handle our own

affairs.







Me and My Shadow: the Fictional STRAWMAN



The elected and appointed administrators of government United States

government have been filing certified copies of all our birth

certificates in the United States Department of Commerce as

registered securities. These securities, each of which carries an

estimated $1,000,000 value, have been (and still are) circulated

around the world as collateral for loans, entries on the asset side

of ledgers, etc., just like any other security. There's just one

problem—we didn't consciously authorize it. Now that you know, you

can choose to let them use you for collateral and pay interest on the

debt or you can take back your power and sovereignty.



The United States is a District of Columbia corporation. In Volume

20: Corpus Juris Sec. 1785 we find "The United States government is a

foreign corporation with respect to a State" (NY re: Merriam 36 N.E.

505 1441 S. 0.1973, 14 L. Ed. 287). Since a corporation is a

fictitious "person" (it cannot speak, see, touch, smell, etc.), it

cannot, by itself, function in the real world. It needs a conduit, a

transmitting utility, a liaison of some sort, to "connect" the

fictitious person, and the fictional world in which it exists, to the

real world. Why is this important?



LIVING people exist in a real world, not a fictional, virtual world.

But government exists in a fictional world, and can only deal

directly with other fictional or virtual persons, agencies, states,

etc. In order for a fictional person to deal with real people there

must be a connection, a liaison, a go-between. This can be something

as simple as a contract. When both "persons", the real and fictional,

agree to the terms of a contract, there is a connection, intercourse,

dealings, there is communication, an exchange. There is business.



But there is another way for fictional government to deal with the

real man and woman—through the use of a representative, a liaison, a

go-between. Who is this go-between that connects fictional government

to real men and women? It's a government-created shadow, a fictional

man or woman, a corporation with the same name as yours.



This PERSON was created by using your birth certificate as the

Manufacturer's Certificate of Origin (MCO) and the state in which you

were born as the "port of entry." This gave fictional UNITED STATES

government a fictional PERSON with whom to deal directly. This PERSON

is a STRAWMAN.



STRAMINEUS HOMO: Latin - A man of straw, one of no substance, put

forward as bail or surety. This definition comes from Black's Law

Dictionary, 6th Edition, page 1421. Following the definition of

STRAMINEUS HOMO in Black's we find the next word, STRAWMAN.



STRAWMAN: A front, a third party who is put up in name only to take

part in a transaction. Nominal party to a transaction, one who acts

as an agent for another for the purpose of taking title to real

property and executing whatever documents and instruments the

principal may direct. Person who purchases property for another to

conceal identity of real purchaser or to accomplish some purpose

otherwise allowed.



Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary defines the

term "STRAWMAN" as "A weak or imaginary opposition set up only to be

easily confuted; or a person set up to serve as a cover for a usually

questionable transaction".



The STRAWMAN can be summed up as an imaginary, passive stand-in for

the real participant; a front; a blind; a person regarded as a

nonentity. The STRAWMAN is a "shadow", a go-between.



For quite some time a rather large number of people in this country

have known that a man or woman's name, written in ALL CAPS, or last

name first, does not identify real, living people. Taking this one

step further, the rules of grammar for the English language have no

provisions for the abbreviation of people's names, i.e. initials are

not to be used. As an example, John Adam Smith is correct. ANYTHING

else is not correct. Not Smith, John Adam or Smith, John A. or J.

Smith or J.A. Smith or JOHN ADAM SMITH or SMITH, JOHN or any other

variation. NOTHING, other than John Adam Smith identifies the real,

living man. All other appellations identify either a deceased man or

a fictitious man such as a corporation or a STRAWMAN.



Over the years, government, through its "public" school system, has

managed to pull the wool over our eyes and keep us all ignorant of

some very important facts. Because all facets of the media have an

ever increasing influence in our lives, and because media is

controlled (with the issuance of licenses, etc.) by government and

its agencies, we have slowly and systematically been led to believe

that any form/appellation of our name is, in fact, still us as long

as the spelling is correct. This is not true.



We were never told, with full and open disclosure, what our

government officials were planning to do ... and why. We were never

told that government (the United States) was a corporation, a

fictitious "person". We were never told that government had quietly,

almost secretly, created a shadow corporation, a STRAWMAN for each

and every American ... so that government could not only control the

people, but also raise an almost unlimited amount of revenue; so it

could continue, not just to exist, but to GROW.



We were never told that when government deals with the STRAWMAN it is

not dealing with real, living men and women. We were never told,

openly and clearly with full disclosure of all the facts, that since

June 5, 1933, we have been unable to pay our debts. We were never

told that we had been pledged (and our children, and their children,

and their children) as collateral, mere chattel, for the debt created

by government officials who created treason in doing so.



We were never told that they quietly and cleverly changed the rules,

even the game itself, and that the world we perceive as real is in

fact fictional - and its all for their benefit. We were never told

that the STRAWMAN—a fictional person, a creature of THE STATE—is

subject to all the codes, statutes, rules, regulations, ordinances,

etc. decreed by government, but that WE, the real man and woman, are

not. We were never told that we were being treated as property, as

slaves, albeit comfortably for some, while living in the land of the

free—and that we could, easily, walk away from the fraud. We never

realized that we were being abused. By knowing the difference between

our real self and our STRAWMAN and behaving accordingly, we regain

our proper sovereignty over "legal fictions" and the ability to

experience true freedom which is our birthright, for the enjoyment of

the Divine in us all.



There's something else you should know: Everything, since June 1933,

operates in COMMERCE. Why is this important? Commerce is based on

agreement, on contract. Government has an implied agreement with the

STRAWMAN which they created and the STRAWMAN is subject to government

rule, as we illustrated above. But when we, the real flesh and blood

man and woman, infer that they are trying to communicate with us and

therefore step into their commercial "process" we become the "surety"

for the fictional STRAWMAN. Reality and fiction are reversed. We

then become liable for the debts, liabilities and obligations of the

STRAWMAN, relinquishing our real (protected by the Constitution)

character as we stand in for the fictional STRAWMAN.



So that we can once again place the STRAWMAN in the fictional world

and keep ourselves in the real world (with all our "shields" in place

against the fictional government) we must send a non-negotiable

(private) "Charge Back" and a non-negotiable "Bill of Exchange" to

the United States Secretary of the Treasury, along with a copy of our

birth certificate, the evidence, the Manufacturer's Certificate of

Origin of the STRAWMAN. By doing this we discharge our portion of the

public debt, releasing us, the real man or woman, from the debts,

liabilities and obligations of the STRAWMAN. Those debts, liabilities

and obligations exist in the fictional commercial world of "book

entries" on computers and/or in paper ledgers. It is a world

of "digits" and "notes", not of money and substance. Property of the

real man once again becomes tax exempt and free from levy.



Sending the non-negotiable Charge Back and Bill of Exchange accesses

our Treasury Direct Account (TDA). What is our TDA? Title 26 USC

section 163(h)(3)(B)(ii), $1,000,000 limitation: "The aggregate

amount treated as acquisition indebtedness for any period shall not

exceed $1,000,000 ($500,000 in the case of a married individual

filing a separate return)."



This $1,000,000 account is for the STRAWMAN, the fictional "person"

with the name in all caps and/or last name first. It is there for the

purpose of making book entries, to move figures, "digits" from one

side of ledgers to the other. Figures, digits, the entries in ledgers

must move from asset side to debit side and back again, or commerce

dies. No movement, no commerce.



The fictional persona of corporate government can only function in a

functional commercial world, one where there is no real money, only

fictional funds ... mere entries, figures, digits.



Corporate, STATE courts only have jurisdiction over the STRAWMAN. A

presentment from fictional government—whether traffic citation or

criminal charges—is a negative, commercial "claim" against the

STRAWMAN. This "claim" takes place in the commercial, fictional world

of government. "Digits" move from one side of your STRAWMAN account

to the other, or to a different account. This is today's commerce. In

the past we have addressed these "claims" by fighting them in court,

with one "legal process" or another, and failed. We have played the

futile, legalistic, charade—a very clever distraction—while the

commerce game played on. We were playing checkers whereas the rules

were MONOPOLY.



But what if we refused to continue playing the charade, and played

the commerce game instead? What if we learned how to control the flow

and movement of entries, figures and digits, for our own benefit? Is

that possible? And if so, how? How can the real man in the real

world, function in the fictional world in which the commerce game

exists?



When in commerce do as commerce does - use the Uniform Commercial

Code (UCC). The UCC-1 Financing Statement is the one contract in the

world that CANNOT be broken and it's the foundation of the Accepted

for Value process. The power of this document is awesome.



Since the TDA exists for the STRAWMAN - who, until now, has been

controlled by the government - WE can gain control and ownership of

the STRAWMAN by first activating the TDA and then filing a UCC-1

Financing Statement. This does two things for us.



First, by activating the TDA we gain limited control over the funds

in the account. This allows us to also move entries, figures and

digits ... for OUR benefit.



Secondly, by properly filing a UCC-1 Financing Statement we become

the "holder in due course" of the STRAWMAN. A filed UCC-1 is public

notice of a registered lien by a real human being who is the secured

party, upon the STRAWMAN, the government-created, foreign non-

registered corporation. With the STRAWMAN under our control,

government has no access to the TDA and they also lose their go-

between, their liaison, their connection to the real, living man and

woman. No longer a subject, you become a free sovereign once again.

You declare your independence!



From now on, when presented with any "claim" or presentment from

government, you will agree with it. This removes the "controversy."

And you "accept it for value." By doing this you remove the negative

claim against your account and become the "holder in due course" of

the presentment. As holder in due course you can require the sworn

testimony of the presenter of the "claim" under penalty of perjury

and request the account be properly adjusted.



You don't have liability for your STRAWMAN. If you do commercial

assignments, you have an asset called a Bill of Exchange which you

can spend out. The birth certificate represents the body. The SSN

represents the commercial account. Behind every birth certificate is

a $1,000,000 bond which is pre-paid financing on any activity of the

STRAWMAN. Some people have used their TDA to pay off their home or

commercial mortgage, bank or student loans, tax liens, or credit card

debt..



When you own your STRAWMAN and anyone else charges against HIM, then

that is commercial trespassing. If anyone goes after your STRAWMAN

and wins any monetary award against the fiction of your STRAWMAN,

then you (the real person/ secured party) get the first $1,000,000 of

that because you have the first lien.



It's all business, a commercial undertaking, and the basic procedure

is not complicated. In fact, it's fairly simple. We just have to

remember a few things, like: this is not a "legal" procedure - we're

not playing People's Court. This is commerce, and we play by the

rules of commerce. We accept the "claim", become the holder in due

course, and challenge whether or not the presenter of the "claim"

had/has the proper authority, the Order, to make the claim (debit our

account) in the first place. When they cannot produce the Order (they

never can, it was never issued) we request the account be properly

adjusted (the charge or claim goes away). Always Accept for Value,

become the holder-in-due-course, and decide not to prosecute

yourself! Are you getting used to this power yet?



If they don't adjust the account a request is made for the

bookkeeping records showing where the funds in question were

assigned. This is done by requesting the Fiduciary Tax Estimate and

the Fiduciary Tax Return for this claim. Since the claim has been

accepted for value and is pre-paid, and our TDA is exempt from levy,

the request for the Fiduciary Tax Estimate and the Fiduciary Tax

Return is valid because the information is necessary in determining

who is delinquent and/or making claims on the account. If there is no

record of the Fiduciary Tax Estimate and the Fiduciary Tax Return, we

then request the individual tax estimates and individual tax returns

to determine if there is delinquency.



If we receive no favorable response to the above requests, we will

then file a currency report on the amount claimed/ assessed against

our account and begin the commercial process that will force them

either to do what is required or lose everything they own!



This is the power of contracts in commerce. A contract overrides the

Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and any other document other than

another contract. No process of law—"color" of law under present

codes, statutes, rules, regulations, ordinances, etc.—can operate

upon you; no agent and/or agency of