Photo credit: Gizmodo

As we have all now heard, the new book by Journalist Michael Wolff has caused serious outrage and taken the spotlight off the ongoing criminal investigations into Hillary Clinton and the multiple crimes that she's committed to focus on an idiotic book that's essentially filled with gossip.

Once the news hit today that Michael Wolff’s new book, <i>Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House</i>, had some controversial statements from Steve Bannon inside; the left-wing media was quick to use the free ammunition they were given in order to fire upon the Trump Administration and also to distract from the fact that the scales of Justice have been tipped towards bringing Clinton to justice once again; and this time there won't be a legion of puppets to cover up for her.

Despite that being the news which should really matter; the negative coverage has been all day avoiding the woven fabric of truth to stay onboard the crumbled paper of lies that are written in Wolff’s book.

In fact, Michael Wolff has a proven history of fabricating and using misleading quotes in the past.

White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said Friday that author Michael Wolff made up quotes for his controversial book about President Trump and the administration.

“This is a guy who made up a lot of stories to try to sell books, and I think more and more people are starting to see that his facts just simply don’t add up,” Mrs. Sanders said on Fox News.

Sanders did confirm that Wolff had spoken to the people he claims to have quoted, but that it was supposed to have been <i>off the record</i>°, to begin with.

Not only did they say it was off the record, but a number of them have said that the things that are attributed to them they simply just didn’t say,” Mrs. Sanders said of those sources Mr. Wolff spoke with.

Sarah Sanders acknowledged that the President of the United States of America also spoke with Wolff, but it was never about the book to begin with.

“We said they spoke once by the phone for a few minutes, but it wasn’t about the book. They had a very short conversation, but he never interviewed the president about the book,” Mrs. Sanders said.

In addition, the White House Press Secretary said Mr. Wolff has a “long history” of “not being very credible” on sourcing, and that's seemingly been confirmed by multiple outlets including <a href="https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jan/5/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-author-admits-not-all-/">The Washington Times</a>.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Michael Wolff, ‘Fire and Fury’ author, admits: Not all in Trump book true - <a href="https://t.co/BIK64gwbbP">https://t.co/BIK64gwbbP</a> - <a href="https://twitter.com/WashTimes?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@washtimes</a></p>— The Washington Times (@WashTimes) <a href="https://twitter.com/WashTimes/status/949319324799524864?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 5, 2018</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

In the prologue in the front cover of the book, Michael Wolff writes that “Many of the accounts of what has happened in the Trump White House are in conflict with one another; many, in Trumpian fashion, are boldly untrue. These conflicts, and that looseness with the truth, if not with reality itself, are an elemental thread of the book.”

“Sometimes,” he wrote, “I have let the players offer their versions, in turn allowing the reader to judge them. In other instances, I have, through a consistency in the accounts and through sources I have come to trust, settled on a version of events I believe to be true.”

This throws a huge wrench into the credible of his book, which certainly helps to tone down what has been misconstrued; but it doesn't change the fact that the President of the United States of America has issued a statement about Bannon, and that his words at least seem to reflect actual incidents.

In the new book, Bannon was quoted as saying that Donald Trump Jr.’s meeting with an alleged Kremlin-linked Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya during the 2016 campaign was “treasonous” and “unpatriotic,” and that the President was likely involved in the meeting, as well; which isn't just a stab in the back, it's false to begin with.

Now before we go any further let me tell you where Bannon is wrong: I tweeted proof of Natalia Veselnitskaya meeting with an Obama Ambassador back in June.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Here's a photo of Natalia Veselnitskaya sitting w/ an Obama Ambassador 8 days after her meeting with Donald Trump Jr<br>Deep State plant? <br>🤔 <a href="https://t.co/SBT1WDZxEk">pic.twitter.com/SBT1WDZxEk</a></p>— 🔴Red Pill 🚨 (@IWillRedPillYou) <a href="https://twitter.com/IWillRedPillYou/status/884964205786537984?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 12, 2017</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

We can automatically make from this that the woman mentioned in the book was a plant, since she's on Camera with Obama's Ambassador. Not some “Russian Spy” with devious intentions outside of the fact that she's also connected to Fusion GPS, the very research firm that Hillary Clinton paid to mislead the public with.

The Goldwater covered this initial report earlier, and<a href="https://thegoldwater.com/news/15329-President-Trump-Puts-Breitbart-in-Check-Bannon-Lost-His-Mind">I expressed my anguish</a>with Steve Bannon. Most certainly this was a horrible decision on behalf of Bannon.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">President Trump Puts Breitbart and Steve Bannon in Check:<br>“Bannon Has Lost His Mind”<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/DrainTheSwamp?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#DrainTheSwamp</a><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/TraitorsFirst?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#TraitorsFirst</a><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/MakeAmericaGreatAgain?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#MakeAmericaGreatAgain</a><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/MAGA?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#MAGA</a><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/PrayForTrump?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#PrayForTrump</a><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/StandWithTrump?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#StandWithTrump</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/RedPill?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#RedPill</a><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Goldwater?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Goldwater</a> <a href="https://t.co/uoIXwtXe44">https://t.co/uoIXwtXe44</a></p>— 🔴Red Pill 🚨 (@IWillRedPillYou) <a href="https://twitter.com/IWillRedPillYou/status/949329042452467712?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 5, 2018</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

He should have known better, Steve Bannon, than to ever speak with someone writing a book without researching his history.

He also should have known better than to trash the President of the United States of America no matter what his feelings are; he should have kept it to himself.

Then to attack President Trump's children? That's low. Sick even. Bannon needs to apologize, and immediately.

As <a href="https://www.axios.com/how-michael-wolff-did-it-2522360813.html"> Axios </a>confirmed earlier, Michael Wolff has the conversations with Steve Bannon tape recorded as well.

Democrats are going to use this for endless ammo and Steve Bannon may have ruined his career over this since most do not forget.

President Trump, however, issued a written statement about Steve Bannon, where he annihilated the man who once worked for him; before he cruelly attacked his children, with the President saying “Steve Bannon has lost his mind”.

<b>Statement from the President of the United States:</b>

<blockquote>”Steve Bannon has nothing to do with me or my Presidency. When he was fired, he not only lost his job, he lost his mind. Steve was a staffer who worked for me after I had already won the nomination by defeating seventeen candidates, often described as the most talented field ever assembled in the Republican party.”</blockquote>

<blockquote>”Now that he is on his own, Steve is learning that winning isn’t as easy as I make it look. Steve had very little to do with our historic victory, which was delivered by the forgotten men and women of this country. Yet Steve had everything to do with the loss of a Senate seat in Alabama held for more than thirty years by Republicans. Steve doesn’t represent my base—he’s only in it for himself.”</blockquote>

<blockquote>”Steve pretends to be at war with the media, which he calls the opposition party, yet he spent his time at the White House leaking false information to the media to make himself seem far more important than he was. It is the only thing he does well. Steve was rarely in a one-on-one meeting with me and only pretends to have had the influence to fool a few people with no access and no clue, whom he helped write phony books.”</blockquote>

<blockquote>”We have many great Republican members of Congress and candidates who are very supportive of the Make America Great Again agenda. Like me, they love the United States of America and are helping to finally take our country back and build it up, rather than simply seeking to burn it all down.”</blockquote>

Either way, this is on Steve Bannon. He said things he shouldn't have and took the focus off Hillary Clinton. There's no excuse for that. None.

<strong><span style="color:red;">Tips? Info? Send me a message!</span></strong>

—<i>[email protected]</i>

<i>Follow Me On Twitter:</i>

<a href="https://www.twitter.com/IWillRedPillYou">@IWillRedPillYou</a>