*insert multitude of complaints about us being SJWs for any number of reasons like including multiple gender options on a survey*

Haha, too bad. - Decibelles

More information on the GOC scale of Types like type green, red, blue, etc. More information on the Technology the Foundation and the GOC uses.

Content just waiting to be written by authors. - LurkD

Lack of horror; needless [REDACTED] or [DATA EXPUNGED] that do not add anything to the file; grammar errors; requirement of reading other # SCP object files in order to understand the first.

I'd enjoy it to be more like it was in the beginning. Less ~special~/mary sue ocs

We can't control what people write if it is received well, and we can't control newbies who refuse to do their homework either. - LurkD

A page where WIP SCP's are listed.

Consider the following: http://scpsandbox2.wikidot.com/system:recent-changes - LurkD

Some ability to provide feedback without having an account on the wiki.

Unfortunately we do require membership for critique. This is to help the quality of critique given. - LurkD

"Make it more emersive (spelling? idk im Russian)

i use the english one but it needs to feel more like im a part of SCP while im reading it. Would be a neat feature."

I feel like SCP needs a website that's reminiscent of a CGI heads-p display. Log in, get authorized (solve a little puzzle or answer some questions) add some voiceover to some elements or animate some stuff. I think it would really add to the immersion and the experience as a whole

I would make it seem more real and scarier because the format just makes me think "Oh, this is just another horror website." The more real the website and stories or the more people get invested, including myself.

Gamification - additional interactive features

A delicate balance of making the site function and maintaining immersion. Always at it. We will take these items into consideration. - LurkD

I think the age limit should be lowered. Ive waiting a while to join and finally when I turned 15 this Feburary I joined. Ive been with SCP since 2013 when I saw Mark play it and ive waited long enough. I think younger users should post their opinions and ideas. Younger people do have a better imagination in my opinion.

Age limit will likely remain 15, we do require a certain degree of maturity to participate. - LurkD

A list of contributors so I know who to thank

Consider the following: http://www.scp-wiki.net/members-pages - LurkD

More momentum in change, in completing old unfinished storylines (gameday). I like the incentives for creation of new content, but going back and tying plots together would be lovely as well.

Would love nothing more, just need talented writers to take care of that. Any takers for finishing up gameday? - LurkD

If there was some option to have content warnings, such as for the multiple SCPs with both implicit and explicit sexual assault, that would be great.

I'm photosensitive and have had issues with unwarned for flashy gifs in articles (that one clown article comes to mind). Obviously this is a wiki that has some serious gorey content and not everything can be warned for, but I don't think an in-universe "this inoculation/footage/etc. is not suitable for staff members with photosensitive epilepsy" warning would result in any tonal breaks.As you can see from my answers, i'm a real casual reader type. But how about bringing more attention to the writers of certain articles? I don't have a lot of time to dig around and would like effective portals to their articles.

Maybe add a little text-box that says something about how the site isn't suitable for kids, because when I first found the site, I became really intrigued (I was like 10 at the time) and I absolutely loved the idea of an SCP Wiki, but when I read a couple SCPs that I really shoudln't've, I became too anxious and developed severe anxiety and OCD. I became really scared. I couldn't even eat or sleep or do homework. Fortunately, it stopped after a few months, but even now I still do some weird OCD type coping thing to assure myself that I'm fine. Idk, I was just really gullible at the time maybe.

A fair suggestion, we will take it into consideration. - LurkD

I think the limitation for Canons having 3 authors should be dropped to 2 or removed entirely: There are several really well put-together Tales series that deserve more recognition and have a quality above or beyond other Canons, but have fewer collaborators. Other than that? I'm really pleased with the current state of the site, especially the 3000 contest: Despite not being a primary horror-SCP fan, I read every entrant and enjoyed… more than half, at least.

Canons are something that has to be established by more than one person. Having the 3/2 rule is not all that unreasonable and will likely stand. That's not to say someone can write a tale series on their own, which is how the majority of canons get started anyhow. - LurkD

If it isn't already a feature of the wiki, I'd change it so that people's SCPs and other pages should be reviewed by highly-rated writers or moderators before they're made public so that there are less low-quality articles.

We very intentionally do not do this. Votes determine if an article stays or not, which is the most simple manner of ensuring content is quality. - Cyantreuse

An additional category for learning the different site locations and their role in the universe (i.e. Site 88.)

Consider the following: http://www.scp-wiki.net/secure-facilities-locations - LurkD

I would at least try to make the way that scp articles look more eye appealing. Another good idea is highlighting and putting famous scp's, such as the statue (scp - 173), into a completely different category than other less known scp's. If you can do this, you could also make a preview, along with a small preview of the photo (if there is any present) and the tags that the article itself appears in. I hope you read this; I love this website, it just needs some tweaks to become perfect.

We are always on the lookout for making aesthetic changes, but there's no reason to make famous SCPs more noticeable. They get plenty of attention on their own. - LurkD

Keep unfinished SCP numbers like most of the SCP slots between 3000-3999 seperate from completed ones as they are not finished in order making it more diffucult to navagate through all of the completed SCP's

Authors like to pick the numbers they want. - Cyantreuse

I think the site is perfect as it is, although an "author's page" or something like that could perhaps be added to the options below, to know who wrote said scp and what else they've created.

Consider the following: http://www.scp-wiki.net/members-pages

You can also look up who wrote the article by clicking on 'History' at the bottom of the page. - LurkD

To make creation easier, I just tried to make an SCP, but a message popped up saying I couldn't. Please message me back at [EMAIL REDACTED] so I can post up [NAME REDACTED], I'd love to have your debacle because I'd love for her to be put on the page as an official SCP, I have a story and my brother did the artwork.

To this and all others like it: Follow the rules and join the site! - Cyantreuse

There should be an audio file section, for example, if there is a confirmed reading of an SCP, the wiki should have it attached, kind of like how people can submit translations on youtube.

Readers could submit their readings, and if accepted they would show up in a separate readings sidebar. Thanks

Consider the following: http://www.scp-wiki.net/audio-adaptations - LurkD

Perhaps better consolidate the resources available to writers - though I have found them, they are pretty hidden, all things considered.

Everything writers would ever need can be found on the sidebar of the wiki. - LurkD

I would simply love to have it more widely known and appreciated. A lot of hard work has gone into this wiki and it is a ton of amazing reading material.

Well, Quikngruvn found out that it reached one million unique visitors within the month of April! - Cyantreuse

Bring the Archived and Deccomissioned SCPs back.

Consider the following: http://www.scp-wiki.net/system:page-tags/tag/decommissioned#pages - LurkD

I would look into tale listing in specific and how they are found and categorized. It can get confusing and difficult to find interesting tales at times that are enjoyable to read.

This is something that has been discussed many times and still looking into, how to tag tales more specifically. - LurkD

Site-wide events, such as the monthly news, have trouble with occurring in a timely manner. The March Madness event, for example, might as well be called May Madness at this point. Also, I'm certain there have been periods where the front page was not updated for over a month. If possible, please try to be better about this in the future.

More frequent contests or events. It seems like a good way to keep people engaged in the site and often leads to some good content being produced

Yes, we also agree this needs to happen more often. - LurkD

Maybe some fan sites. Like a website for Anderson Electronics.

If anyone has the initiative and know-how to do this, then more power to them! - LurkD

they fucking never told me why i couldnt fucking join the scp foundation

Did you do the required reading: http://www.scp-wiki.net/guide-for-newbies - LurkD

the ability to add content the existing SCPs e.g articles on events that happened during the Testing of the SCP.

I wouldn't really care if this was added or not, but if there was a page for adding in art of anything relating to SCP events, personnel or subjects, as long as it's within some rules the admins make. If there's already one, I can't seem to find it….X>

Really up to the author if it is open to collaboration or not. Here is a list of collaboration articles:

http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/system:page-tags/tag/collaboration - LurkD

More pictures at the top of case files

Maybe more images added to articles that may have that many or ones that don't have any.

more pictures

Pictures are always optional for articles. - LurkD

"The one thing I really do not like (and which is the reason I marked 'I hold issue with article content' above) is 231. It is, essentially, a story about raping a child and despite all the other horrible things on this site, this just goes too far. (Yes, I know that this is a very old discussion, but it is the only thing about the site which really bothers me.)"

It may imply this… but consider the following: http://www.scp-wiki.net/fear-alone - LurkD

Headcanons are headcanons. I have a headcanon for Procedure 110-Montauk that has absolutely nothing to do with sexual intercourse like the article supposedly implies, and said headcanon still checks out with the facts given by the article. - Cyantreuse

This said, unlike my comrades, I feel you on 231. The site back then thrived on shock horror though, and to a lot of users, shock horror is something they like. The only thing to do is comment on the article and downvote. - Decibelles

Sorry to ask awkward things, but I can't find anything on the guides in whether nsfw tales are allowed?

We have an adult tag for tales, yes. - Cyantreuse