"After careful consideration, I have decided that there should be no further delay in bringing this matter to court," Attorney-General Gabrielle Upton said. Bowraville victims: Evelyn Greenup, 4, Colleen Walker-Craig, 16, and Clinton Speedy-Duroux, 16. "The best and most transparent way to deal with this tragic case is to make an application for retrial to the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal." Leonie Duroux, the sister-in-law of Clinton Speedy-Duroux, told Fairfax Media she was "so excited" by the breakthrough. "These kids deserve justice. They were innocent. They didn't deserve to die," Ms Duroux said.

"It's just what we've been fighting for. It's a chance to argue it fairly. Unless you argue the three cases [together] you don't get the full picture." Detective Inspector Gary Jubelin, who has worked on the case for almost 20 years, told Fairfax Media the news came as a surprise to the police and the families. "It's been a battle for the families to get the matter to this point, it's been a quarter of a century that they've been trying to get justice for their families and they see this as a step in the right direction," he said. "The families contacted me straight after the Attorney-General had notified them, and they were overcome with emotion - understandably given the battle they've had to get justice for these children." Detective Inspector Jubelin has previously said the Aboriginal families suffered racism and disrespect at the hands of authorities.

A white man, known to the Indigenous community in Bowraville, was tried and acquitted of the murders of two of the children and was also a suspect in Colleen Walker-Craig's death. Her body has never been found. The families of the children have long called for the suspect to be tried for all three crimes together because of evidence they say links the cases to each other and the alleged killer. But the double jeopardy principle – a legal rule preventing a person facing criminal trial more than once for the same crime – has been regarded as a stumbling block to a retrial. The state's double jeopardy laws were changed with the Bowraville cases in mind in 2006 to allow a person to be tried again for the same crime if "fresh and compelling evidence" came to light. However, there is a fraught legal question about whether evidence said to link the cases to each other and the alleged killer meets the legal definition of "fresh" and has not previously been "adduced" in court.

The evidence was available during one of the trials but could not be used because of restrictive rules of evidence, which have since been changed. NSW upper house Greens MP David Shoebridge led the push in May for the laws to be changed again to ensure the Bowraville cases could be retried but the move was not supported by the government or the Labor Opposition. However, he believes the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal could choose to interpret existing double jeopardy provisions in the same way as courts in England, which would allow the cases to be retried. "Ultimately it will be a matter for the Court of Appeal to carefully weigh all the evidence before them," Mr Shoebridge said. "But there is a powerful body of factual material and very strong legal arguments that make this a case of real merit.

"Fundamentally, this is a victory for the families and the community that have always wanted their day in court - and now they're going to get it." The NSW Police had urged Ms Upton to apply for a retrial in the Court of Criminal Appeal. She said on Tuesday "the court must be satisfied that the evidence is fresh, compelling and that a retrial is in the interests of justice," Ms Upton said. "While there can be no certainty whatsoever about the outcome, this is the course of action that promises a sense of closure for all involved." A former South Australian Director of Public Prosecutions, Wendy Abraham, QC, will appear in court on Ms Upton's behalf.