Forgive me for intervening or making it sound like I'm trying to create pointless drama in past conversations that should probably be coming to a close already. But this Hitler comparison to Bellwether is so overrated, shallow and petty that I do not understand why users have to always bring him up when it comes to Bellwether and why they can't use comparisons to fictional villains instead of real life figures. I just find it shallow and petty, even when someone uses it as if they're trying to change someone's mind or point of view when the other doesn't want to. The reference to Hitler is not a good one I have to disagree on that. I wish people would stop with the Hitler and Trump crap already. This is Zootopia we're talking about, not history class or the White House. Hitler and Trump are nothing like Bellwether for they hate for no other reason than power and domination, not because of a sad background story in their time. Not to mention someone pairs Bellwether with Trump :ew: which totally violates the laws of nature. The guy is already married, having been divorced three times so there is no way Bellwether would be stupid enough to fall for a guy like him.Also what the hell is it with some people defending Lionheart like he is a good honest mayor that can do no wrong, and is perfect in every way?And why should Bellwether be a worst mammal than Lionheart just because she was the twist villain? We still don't know what was happening off screen after the conference meeting where it raised a lot of unanswered questions than everything cleared out. And no, I'm not saying Bellwether shouldn't be held responsible for what she did and does need to serve time for what she did and face the consequences of her actions. But it's like people totally ignore the fact that Lionheart still mistreated Bellwether to the point where she was viewed as nothing but an unimportant, meaningless, underappreciated, secretary who is only good for paper work, being yelled at, and being pushed aside, not to mention him treating her like an overworked slave, possibly taking credit for what she does and never thanks her, and never apologizes for any of his mistreatment anytime. I already paid close attention to what the movie reveals with the small details and clues given, so I picked on some things myself, even with help from other friends that pointed it out. I already know Judy and Bellwether are small prey mammals who have been pushed around, underestimated, and underappreciated and have wanted to change the world for the better. Thing is that Judy I believe always had friends and family to turn to for support and encouragement whenever she was down on her luck and felt troubled and doubtful in her goals. While for Bellwether, I sense she had nobody to turn to for any of that, meaning her life was harder and situation with predators was worse than Judy's. Apparently someone has already made fun of me for thinking this theory, as if that makes me a stupid, simple minded, villain sympathizing fool who only thinks and sees what she wants, denying any real FACTS. I just think things differently with villains that's all. I just wish others would accept that and go their own way instead of trying to make us Bellwether fans feel stupid and pathetic for wanting to know more about her since she is underdeveloped. I mean even Iracebeth (Alice in Wonderland 2010 & Through the Looking Glass 2016) and Randall Boggs were underdeveloped, but gave a deeper meaning on how their villainy got started and what became the last straw on their part. Surely they must be saving something for Bellwether. I just don't think it is fair to call Bellwether a pure evil, full blown psychopath with no redeeming qualities as if she was born evil in the first place, and I doubt she only joined as assistant mayor so she could be in power later. And I also think it is unfair to call her a worst evil mammal than Lionheart since she is still underdeveloped, even after all the little clues gathered in her situation with the mayor and what she mentions about predators, as if she is secretly hiding the fact that she was terribly wronged and horribly discriminated against herself mostly by predators, even in her childhood. I am now having doubts her life has been all happy, meaning she came from a hard, miserable life herself that she is too ashamed to talk about for so long, and why blame her for snapping after Lionheart could have possibly crossed the line with his mistreatment and might have done things to her off screen that the movie doesn't want us to know about.But if someone thinks I'm being foolish, ignorant, blind, and stupid on this, that's their problem. I only say what I believe to be possible. All of our favorite villains and tragic villains have tried to kill someone, so Bellwether is NOT the only villain to do all that and will not be the last. I get tired of people acting like her actions really happened and she's the only villain that ever tried to dominate all, but as put it, she intended to segregate predators from prey, possibly by creating an predator only district, but her fantasy became warped with the wrong methods, but too lost in her dark world to see what she was doing any longer. She's like so many sympathetic villains on my meme list. I would have snapped too if all the amount of stress, anger, fear, discrimination, depression, and self loathing became too much to handle much longer. Even then, I still refuse to hate her just for being chosen as the twist villain, when personally I wished they picked someone else. But I know she had more than one reason, and NOT just for money and power. And NOT only because of Lionheart either. I can see her lost in her anger and depression, not only because of her plans lost, but more on thinking nobody can ever understand why she did what she did, or what's like being in her place as a discriminated mammal being told that she's nothing but a "worthless" prey mammal all her life.