As former CIA Director Michael Hayden observed, under military justice, these interventions by the president would have required the dismissal of charges against an accused on grounds of undue command interference.

I can say, however, if this were conducted under the rules that pertain to military justice, it would have been thrown out because of what we call “undue command influence”. 2/3 — Gen Michael Hayden (@GenMhayden) March 17, 2018

But in the hours since the McCabe firing, Trump’s enablers in Congress and in conservative media have evinced no such concern. They have accepted the story that McCabe was honestly investigated and independently disciplined without qualm or quibble. In the words of former Fox News anchor Brit Hume:

“It’s certainly conceivable that Trump, being Trump, would reach into the inner workings of the FBI and Justice Dept. to frame Andrew McCabe and get him fired. But anyone who claims that’s what happened needs to provide evidence to back it up. Mere supposition doesn’t cut it.”

But aren’t the president’s own written and globally published demands for a firing some kind of evidence?

Apparently not.

All this matters even more urgently when you consider the McCabe firing as a road test for Trump’s method in an impending showdown with Special Counsel Robert Mueller.

What will the president’s party in Congress permit? What will the president’s media supporters repeat? What will the president’s supporters in the country believe? The story they have been told about McCabe previews the story they will soon hear about Mueller.

As many have noted, Trump’s March 17 tweet about Mueller—his first to attack Mueller by name—heaps lie upon lie.

The Mueller probe should never have been started in that there was no collusion and there was no crime. It was based on fraudulent activities and a Fake Dossier paid for by Crooked Hillary and the DNC, and improperly used in FISA COURT for surveillance of my campaign. WITCH HUNT! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 18, 2018

The allegations did not originate with the Steele dossier; many of the dossier’s claims have been corroborated; the FISA court behaved properly; and there has been enough evidence of crime to lead to the indictment of Trump’s former campaign chairman, Trump’s former national-security adviser, and 13 Russian nationals.

But the test for Trump is not credibility or even plausibility. It is the reliability of his party, his media, and his voters. The McCabe practice test yielded answers that have to be gratifying for the president as he ponders his next move to save himself, his family, and his administration from the workings of justice.