If We're Going To Fix Copyright, We Need Much More Transparency

from the a-necessary-factor dept

Most requests came from publishers, distributors, collective rights organizations, service providers and intermediaries (57% altogether), while it was more difficult to get directly to the group most often referred to in public debate: The authors. The results of the copyright consultation with many authors’ responses demonstrate that the interests of collecting societies and individual authors can differ significantly.

Meetings requested

Rightholders Authors Authorities Service providers Academia Users Meetings taken



Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community. Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis. While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Glyn already covered European Parliament Member (and the EU Parliament's only Pirate Party representative) Julia Reda's report on copyright reform in the EU. However, for Day 3 of Copyright Week -- which is all about, I wanted to focus on the other aspect of Reda's release of her report: just how transparent she's been. When we talk about transparency in copyright law, we're often talking about theof such transparency, often via international trade negotiations, like ACTA, TPP and TAFTA/TTIP, in which backroom dealing is done by unelected bureaucrats. The public is kept out of the negotiating process entirely, while lobbyists have full access . Combine that with the revolving door between the negotiators and the lobbyists themselves, and it's a recipe for non-transparent policy-making by which legacy industries get all the "gifts" they want.Reda's approach with her report on copyright shows that it doesn't need to be that way. Along with the report, she detailed all of the 86 meeting requests she received from lobbyists regarding copyright (noting that the number went way up after she was appointed to write this report):She also noted that she really wanted to "balance out the attention paid to various interest groups" and that she really wanted to speak to content creators directly, rather than middlemen:The end result:She also includes a list of every lobbying meeting request she received on copyright:This is great to see, and it would be nice to see others working on these issues post similar things. A few years ago, I noticed that while the USTR's FOIA website has a page for visitor logs , that page is conveniently left blank:Afterof back and forth, the USTR finally sent me visitor logs in an almost entirely unusable manner. Here's one of the many documents that were sent:Compare and contrast the two situations. One appears to be representative government. The other seems to be doing everything possible to hide what's really going on when it comes to important things like understanding who's influencing copyright policy.

Filed Under: acta, copyright, copyright reform, julia reda, tafta, tpp, trade agreements, transparency, ttip, ustr