New York Times columnist Paul Krugman continued the attacks on Donald Trump this weekend writing it was “patriotic” to call Donald Trump “illegitimate.”

But let’s not talk about Mr. Trump’s ravings. Instead, let’s ask whether Mr. Lewis was right to say what he said. Is it O.K., morally and politically, to declare the man about to move into the White House illegitimate?

Yes, it is. In fact, it’s an act of patriotism.

And these far left cranks wonder why Americans don’t trust their biased news anymore?

If you look at this crank’s Twitter account it’s littered with anti-Trump tweets.

Before the election he posted several tweets projecting the Republican Party’s response once Hillary won the election.

TRENDING: Wray Claims "White Supremacists" Make Up the Largest Share of Racially Motivated Terrorists in the US as BLM Burns Businesses to the Ground (VIDEO)

Some advance thoughts on post-election punditry: it’s already obvious that pundits will dismiss HRC’s achievement 1/ — Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) October 15, 2016

They’ll claim that she only won because she had an insane opponent, and/or that she should have won by a bigger margin 2/ https://t.co/0tz34ECLQR — Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) October 15, 2016

The point is that Trump didn’t just happen to melt down, HRC triggered his meltdown — and that required grace + steely resolve 6/ https://t.co/Bd72EpuIET — Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) October 15, 2016

Plus of course her gender. So there’s a real case that HRC was by far the best person to beat Trump, and bring GOP sickness into the open 7/ https://t.co/NN85jsTImK — Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) October 15, 2016

Paul does not have much of a record with his predictions.