Nothing was implied or suggested. Something was stated.

Not sure I agree with you at all here.

When a statement is made, there 'is' implication - or why make the statement in the first place? Either you validate or disprove, that is implied, or no statement at all. Here I understand what Endust is asking... too many questions/concerns to come out with such a strong statement and understanding of the result - My question(s): How/when/where did we receive, when did we tell TT, how did (if) we use suggested info, etc...

This statement opens up further questioning, and if TT can prove that such info was provided without consent, Pandora's box was just opened up. Our communications team and atty's know this, and would not make such a statement without knowing the desired outcome. To think otherwise is not smart.

