Many more people in Pennsylvania have been raising their hands recently.

In 2006, according to a Franklin and Marshall poll, about 20 percent of residents backed the idea. The number now is around 60 percent.

Nationally, there’s been a massive culture shift in that time. Since 2012, ten states and the District of Columbia have legalized recreational pot.

None of those include states that border Pennsylvania, but New York and New Jersey seem poised to make it happen.

In Pennsylvania, though, it is a different story.

Gov. Tom Wolf and the Republican-controlled legislature agreed to legalize medical marijuana in 2016, but Wolf only began signaling his support for recreational marijuana after winning re-election in the fall.

Advancing this idea requires winning support from lawmakers on both sides of the aisle who remain skeptical, with Republican leaders standing firmly against.

State Rep. Jake Wheatley, D-Allegheny County, recently introduced a bill that would legalize weed, tax it at around 35 percent and use the revenue on workforce development, community mentoring programs and student debt forgiveness.

Wheatley said the new funding could also help chip away at the state’s $1.7 billion budget deficit.

“We believe we will easily be between $580 million to $600 million new dollars recurring every year,” Wheatley said.

His bill has 27 co-sponsors — all Democrats.

Opposition seems stiff among Republicans in the Senate as well.

“I don’t think there’s any chance this passes this session. I will do whatever I can as a leader to not allow it to happen this session,” said Majority Leader Jake Corman, R-Centre. “I know public support has moved on this, and that’s certainly understandable. But at the same time, I think the evidence from the states that have done it certainly isn’t compelling. I think we should take a go-slow approach.”

Corman says he has an open mind. He was adamantly against medical marijuana, but later supported it.

“We all evolve. We all educate ourselves,” Corman said. “Maybe this is down the line. I don’t know.”

Top Democrats also seem reluctant to endorse the idea.

Like Corman, they say as long as marijuana remains illegal under federal law, Pennsylvania should stay on the sidelines.

House Minority Leader Frank Dermody, D-Allegheny, says he supports the concept in theory, but has not co-signed Wheatley’s bill.

“Dermody also feels it’s important for the federal government to remove cannabis from the list of Schedule 1 drugs so that the industry can function more freely within the law,” spokesman Bill Patton said.

On his 67 county tour, Fetterman says he’s hearing from many residents who want the state to act now. And behind the scenes, operatives say this is real reason the lieutenant governor is trekking hundreds of miles in every direction of the state: to build an overwhelming amount of anecdotal evidence in hopes of converting doobie doubters.

So far, Fetterman says he’s seeing support at levels even higher than polls suggest.

“I want to be clear: some very conservative counties. I would peg that support as a little bit higher based on the rooms and our online feedback,” he said.

Wheatley admits: his bill is likely to die this session. Still, he hopes the conversation it starts will force skeptics to reconsider.

“I think there’s still this negative, false stigma that somehow ending this prohibition makes you soft on crime. Or that you’re somehow continuing the moral decay of our society,” he said.

If New York and New Jersey pass legal pot laws before Pennsylvania, Wheatley said Pennsylvania residents will learn about it fast.

“And then see our population run across the border and spend their hard-earned dollars in other states,” Wheatley said.

The tough thing about this debate — both in Pennsylvania and nationally — is the lack of comprehensive scientific research.

In recent months there have been high profile reports that have cautioned against legalization — and others that have emphasized the idea that alcohol and tobacco are much more dangerous.

But that’s the hitch: as long as marijuana remains classified as illegal and dangerous under federal law, there will be restrictions on how much it can be studied.

And so, for now, even as Fetterman gathers support from the Delaware to the Monongahela, the debate in Pennsylvania remains in this catch-22.

“If this is truly, scientifically not as harmful as it was thought of decades ago,” said Majority Leader Corman, “then [Congress] ought to move on that.”

—

This story has been updated to clarify House Minority Leader Frank Dermody’s position.