#MH17: Analysis by Valentin Vasilescu, former military pilot.

Valentin Vasilescu demonstrates, why #MH17 was NOT shot down by Buk-1M (no guiding electro-magnetic beam, no visible white condensate trail, no explosive sound at the alleged populated site of launch, character of damage). Instead, he comes to the conclusion that it was shot down by MIG-29 that was guided by Ukrainian controllers.



He also expresses his suprise that not ICAO, not Eurocontrol mentioned an obvious violation of navigation rules. According to Doc. 4444 (Air-Procedures Rules for Air Navigation Services), Article 7.4.4, Ukrainian ATC had to create min. 9.3 km gap between #MH17 & military jet. Since #MH17 was 30 miles from being transfered to Russian ATC, the separation gap for these 2 planes had to be min. 11.1 km. Instead, military ATC led fighter jet as close as 3 km to #MH17.



Why have ICAO and Eurocontrol hidden this violation of the rules of navigation?



Russian radars can distinguish 2 aircrafts, separated by 4 km When the distance is less than 4 km, the two signals merge on the radar screen. But the Russians stated that, according to its speed, Ukrainian fighter has exceeded the threshold of 4 km, continuing its approach toward the flight MH-17 to enter the ZAP (possible attack area) for weapons of artillery on board.



Valentin Vasilescu states that Ukrainian pilots didn't have skills required to shot down #MH17, due to insufficient training and that Polish military pilots had such skills, as well as knowledge of Ukrainian air space.



http://reseauinternational.net/vol-mh-17-abattu-avion-chasse-ukrainien/





Reply · Report Post