Secretary of State Mike Pompeo Michael (Mike) Richard PompeoOvernight Defense: Pentagon redirects pandemic funding to defense contractors | US planning for full Afghanistan withdrawal by May | Anti-Trump GOP group puts ads in military papers Overnight Defense: House Democrats unveil stopgap spending measure to GOP opposition | Bill includes .6B for new subs | Trump issues Iran sanctions after world shrugs at US action at UN Navalny calls on Russia to return clothes he was wearing when he fell ill MORE was grilled about funding for diplomatic security while testifying before the House Foreign Affairs Committee on Wednesday morning.

Rep. Gregory Meeks Gregory Weldon MeeksBottom line Democrats go big on diversity with new House recruits Chamber of Commerce, banking industry groups call on Senate to pass corporate diversity bill MORE (D-N.Y.) confronted Pompeo during the hearing about the decrease in spending on diplomatic security under the Trump administration.

“Under the Obama Administration, over $3 billion went to diplomatic security, but once President Trump Donald John TrumpOmar fires back at Trump over rally remarks: 'This is my country' Pelosi: Trump hurrying to fill SCOTUS seat so he can repeal ObamaCare Trump mocks Biden appearance, mask use ahead of first debate MORE came in, I see it went to down $2.1 billion ... and down to $1.6 billion,” Meeks stated.

ADVERTISEMENT

“So where is the concern now about diplomatic security?” he asked Pompeo.

“Diplomatic security is not about dollars and spending,” Pompeo responded, adding that the real task is “being thoughtful about where you put people.”

“We’re going to take risks. We’re going to be an expeditionary State Department,” Pompeo concluded. “I think President Trump demands it; I think each of you do as well.”

“Under the Obama Administration, over $3 billion went to diplomatic security, but once President Trump came in, I see it went to down $2.1 billion...and down to $1.6 billion,” Rep. Meeks says. “So where is the concern now about diplomatic security?” he asks Pompeo pic.twitter.com/8u0ZdwaiDj — CBS News (@CBSNews) May 23, 2018

Meeks later called Pompeo a hypocrite for saying Hillary Clinton Hillary Diane Rodham ClintonButtigieg stands in as Pence for Harris's debate practice Senate GOP sees early Supreme Court vote as political booster shot Poll: 51 percent of voters want to abolish the electoral college MORE failed on diplomatic security as secretary of State but not focusing on it now that he is in that position.

“You didn’t give her any courtesy when Secretary Hillary Clinton was sitting in her seat before the Benghazi Committee and you scolded her. You went after her with venom,” Meeks said to Pompeo, adding that he hasn't heard him mention diplomatic security "one single time."

Pompeo, who served on the Benghazi select committee while in the House, wrote in a report that Clinton “failed to lead” after she was warned that the security situation in the Benghazi consulate was dangerous.

“Should we conclude that because you have not mentioned it one time ... should we conclude based on that fact that you do not care about diplomatic security?" Meeks asked.

“No, you should not conclude that,” Pompeo fired back, raising his voice while saying that the first briefing he received after assuming the position was on security. “I take diplomatic security very seriously.”

Trump tapped Pompeo, who previously led the CIA, to serve as his secretary of State following Rex Tillerson Rex Wayne TillersonGary Cohn: 'I haven't made up my mind' on vote for president in November Kushner says 'Alice in Wonderland' describes Trump presidency: Woodward book Conspicuous by their absence from the Republican Convention MORE's ouster from the position in March.

In his first budget blueprint released last year, Trump proposed cutting the State Department budget by 28 percent, a move that White House budget chief Mick Mulvaney Mick MulvaneyMick Mulvaney to start hedge fund Fauci says positive White House task force reports don't always match what he hears on the ground Bottom line MORE conceded at the time was "fairly dramatic."

However, Tillerson defended the proposed cuts, saying they were needed to fix what he deemed a "historically high" budget.

"Clearly the level of spending that the State Department has been undertaking, particularly in this past year, is simply not sustainable," he said at the time.

Tillerson had also imposed a partial hiring freeze after entering the State Department last year as part of a "redesign" of the agency, a move that drove down morale among career officials at the department.

Pompeo earlier this month lifted the hiring freeze on the Foreign and Civil services.

--Updated at 12:20 p.m.