th, 2008 at 2:20pm:

th, 2008 at 2:03pm:

th, 2008 at 9:06am:

Polygraphy may be bullshit, but it can be highly lucrative bullshit for those with the right connections

It seems the Department of the Army disagrees with you regarding the value of polyraph. George W. Maschke wrote on Oct 19, 2008 at 9:06am:It seems the Department of the Army disagrees with you regarding the value of polyraph.



To be sure, it does. But then again, the Department of the Army also disagrees with the



Quote:

I have long maintained that profanity is the refuge of the weak-minded or intellectually maladroit. You seem to resort to it it whenever you find yourself outside your comfort zone or when you are trying to emphasize a point.



Yes, I used "bullshit" for emphasis, because "humbuggery" and "poppycock" are too quaint.



Quote:

Quote:

It's worth noting that at least some Islamist insurgents in Iraq are well aware that polygraph "testing" is a fraud. See "The Myth of the Lie Detector" published in the Iraqi jihadist e-zine, Al-Fath, and available here in English translation. And for discussion, see Al-Qaeda Has Read The Lie Behind the Lie Detector.



Thoughout your postings I am amazed that you can appear so proud at the prospect that your information is being used by the enemies of our country while denying any responsibility for the translation of that information. Even if one believes you when you claim you did not translate your book into Arabic or Farsi, I can't help but wonder whether or not you have communictaed the information contained in your book to the enemies of our country, perhaps in another way?



My question is this:

Have you ever participated in a conversations or correspondance in Arabic, Farsi, Persian, or any of the other languages natively spoken by Al Qaeda , the Taliban, or Islamist insurgents in Iraq or Afganistan in which you describe or explain the countermeasures described in your book? Thoughout your postings I am amazed that you can appear so proud at the prospect that your information is being used by the enemies of our country while denying any responsibility for the translation of that information. Even if one believes you when you claim you did not translate your book into Arabic or Farsi, I can't help but wonder whether or not you have communictaed the information contained in your book to the enemies of our country, perhaps in another way?My question is this:Have you ever participated in a conversations or correspondance in Arabic, Farsi, Persian, or any of the other languages natively spoken by Al Qaeda , the Taliban, or Islamist insurgents in Iraq or Afganistan in which you describe or explain the countermeasures described in your book?



That's no business of yours . SanchoPanza wrote on Oct 19, 2008 at 2:03pm:To be sure, it does. But then again, the Department of the Army also disagrees with the National Academy of Sciences regarding the value of polygraphy.Yes, I used "bullshit" for emphasis, because "humbuggery" and "poppycock" are too quaint.



Thank you Considering everything else you deny; your lack of denial here tells me what I need to know.



Did you translate your book into any of those languages?



Sancho Panza George W. Maschke wrote on Oct 19, 2008 at 2:20pm:Thank you Considering everything else you deny; your lack of denial here tells me what I need to know.Did you translate your book into any of those languages?Sancho Panza