We, I guess, can expect he’s going to give us a “CliffsNotes” version that he will write himself. This means that the country may never learn about information that does not go into an indictment. And that just is completely unsatisfactory. The country deserves to know what the Russians did in our elections, what role the president played or his campaign associates played. And to have a situation where the nominee for attorney general says you can’t indict a sitting president, you can only impeach one if it’s warranted — but we’re not going to give you the evidence to determine whether impeachment is in order — means we’re not gonna have a rule of law. We’re going to have immunity.

If it’s going to be the position of the incoming attorney general . . . that the public doesn’t get to learn about this, then it will fall upon Congress to share with the American people what happened, and we will do that in several ways. We will do that by trying to compel that report to be provided to Congress, but we’ll also do it by developing the record ourselves and by sharing with the country the product of our investigation.