

If you can’t beat them, threaten them with Plod In the ongoing war of words on the website of the only national daily where some semblance of free speech exists, the poor, benighted anti-racist fraternity, that blight on light of humanity and hope of all who desire a world without white people injustice, has devised a new response to the foul, horrid, nasty, articulate, winning, emotionally-whole racists and haters who have dominated everyone are abominated by everyone. They’ve discovered the Public Order Act, 1986. Here’s a few, rather disembodied samples of the fine use to which they are threatening to put it, all from the same DT thread titled Hispanics: the rising power in the United States simon21

Yesterday 11:39 AM Hispanics are white

And as a holocaust denier and advocate of ethnic cleansing you don’t really have any credibility to comment

you may feel you are being satirical, sorry the courts don’t recognise satiical advocates of racial violence. simon21

Yesterday 10:46 AM To advocate ethnic cleansing is against the law full stop.

So is genocide.

You may think this is wit, the courts have decided otherwise

You will end up being reported and arrested.

I urge you to stop posting, the moderators may be compelled to hand over your details such as they are. simon21

Yesterday 11:11 AM I strongly advise youto stop posting. Blog posts can be used as evidence.

You have advocated ethnic cleansing of Europe’s jewish people.

This is beyond incitement. May I remind you what happened to David Irving? zedeyejoe

Yesterday 12:35 PM Sorry no, anti-racist is what it says, an equal acceptance of people regardless of their skin colour. To say otherwise is a lie.

Of course you can decry a murderer or thief regardless of their race and should do so.

I feel that you are rapidly approaching the point where you can be prosecuted under section 18 of the Public Order act 1986. TimMiddleton

Yesterday 02:03 PM I have repeatedly expressed concern on this site that the Telegraph does an unacceptably poor job of enforcing its own moderation policy. There is material posted on this thread which is truly sickening. Repeatedly, we have been subjected to crude and hysterical racism - including holocaust denial - which would debase the reputation of the back of a toilet door, never mind a supposedly credible national newspaper.

Apart from anything else, much of what has been spewed out below is very probably illegal, and it is to be expected that the Telegraph would be anxious to take such steps required to prevent its own prosecution.

If this newspaper really wishes to be taken seriously by anyone other than a rabble of adolescent hooligans it desperately needs to get a grip. diatomkid

1 day ago I have made the same point myself Tim many times. Sometimes my comments have then been deleted whilst comments quite openly advocating genocide, discrimination and general levels of violence and thuggery have been allowed to stand unchallenged by moderators. I do wonder just what sort of editorial policy the DT secretly has and just why this contemptible, reprehensible filth is permitted zedeyejoe

1 day ago Reading the posts would do it. Of course we could turn it over to the police and let them sort it out if you prefer? zedeyejoe

1 day ago



Silence you, rubbish. Just making people aware of the trouble their ranting could get them into if they break the law. The law has been around for over 25 years now of course. The Act, by the way, sets a reasonably high bar to prosecution. The Crown must be able to demonstrate not only the presence of language that might be threatening, abusive or insulting, but that racial hatred has been stirred up by same. There has to be a linkage. Further, Section 18 states: A person who is not shown to have intended to stir up racial hatred is not guilty of an offence under this section if he did not intend his words or behaviour, or the written material, to be, and was not aware that it might be, threatening, abusive or insulting. It is not easy to manufacture an intention to stir up racial hatred from an articulate presentation of the morality of survival. Now Dan can come along and tell me that it is!



Comments:

































Post a comment:



Next entry: Viva Lux EPISODE 1 Apocalypse Summer of Babalon rising

Previous entry: Clamoring for war against Syria: Part 2