Download raw source

Delivered-To: john.podesta@gmail.com Received: by 10.25.43.200 with SMTP id r191csp591203lfr; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 03:24:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.70.136.162 with SMTP id qb2mr15584107pdb.141.1440152679470; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 03:24:39 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <cosgrovetc@gmail.com> Received: from mail-pa0-x229.google.com (mail-pa0-x229.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400e:c03::229]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id oy7si8857141pdb.53.2015.08.21.03.24.38 for <john.podesta@gmail.com> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 21 Aug 2015 03:24:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of cosgrovetc@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::229 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400e:c03::229; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of cosgrovetc@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::229 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=cosgrovetc@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: by mail-pa0-x229.google.com with SMTP id fo6so4375823pad.1 for <john.podesta@gmail.com>; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 03:24:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=9cE3IryTmCgvUa7SMdzgvOHVigUi7ghN6rYAsBOacPU=; b=x3nHdjjgOM2dy8hp/jzdaxk8YNY+3tX5qUM1YtBppv94mquCHI4opsNbJs7ScwrLWx Cyi2kFCOKcJAwNeKRH8MROopF0P3Azc72WKn/PSZL005sRqqRsAhfTjtW8VuggpGzPvH qnlDVdwwE3CAK5skcUAGnTEJTlTNuRnwmgqVne5F1KW+yVLqmdHe6+pBTGsogTTvSBpz GSDvBDmyfy2k45D2behi2WmFDWvpNJa1YQouTwMslT9JjQuqIzJ539BCWtkp6BGFHnj1 Z7vcFPUS/CpgP0l3PF+7i6wsQVBQEU6CaUD4ZCYvG9qbzZlewoDFURE8C0bOy0v8ybqX IqZw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.231.5 with SMTP id tc5mr16041667pbc.54.1440152678383; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 03:24:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.161.8 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 03:24:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 06:24:38 -0400 Message-ID: <CA+Q+7BPqECttbXeM1i1mOEvNewrXHrdzo54KSSZXzj=EY8-DvA@mail.gmail.com> Subject: More on managing "Trolls" From: Tom Cosgrove <cosgrovetc@gmail.com> To: John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b33d828d147a0051dcfac4d --047d7b33d828d147a0051dcfac4d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 A couple of things to consider if you were to use WikiWisdom: 1. It is designed to be used with a group peers in this instance the peers would be registered Democrats or Independents who self identify as planning to vote in the 2016 Democratic primary in their appropriate state. The Campaign would be doing the inviting and I assume as access already to a data base in each state of Democratic primary voters with emails. By controlling who is invited helps address the troll issue. 2. Although the "brainstorming" phase online will gather attention it is really the dozen "thought leaders" who are chosen to prepare the report with the moderator and then present in person to HRC the results that are the key. We use an algorithm to create a list of potential thought leaders and then chose the actual group in consultation with our clients. This gives us an ability to weed out potential embarrassing choices. For example in NC recently for a health system one of thought leaders we were going to choose had been on several reality shows. The client knew this, we did not, so that person was in the end not chosen. 3. I think the presentation meetings offer you a chance to show case HRC in a setting she masters -- thoughtful, probing back forth on issues of substance - and to do so in a format -- not unlike the Black Lives Matter video -- where her authenticity shines through. 4. Lastly we could work with you to chose former journalists to be the moderates of each particular project - NH, IO, SC or Black Lives. Tom c. 617-529-1170 --047d7b33d828d147a0051dcfac4d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr">A couple of things to consider if you were to use WikiWisd= om:<div><br></div><div>1. =C2=A0 It is designed to be used with a group pee= rs in this instance the peers would be registered Democrats or Independents= who self identify as planning to =C2=A0vote in the 2016 Democratic primary= in their appropriate state.</div><div><br></div><div>The Campaign would be= doing the inviting and I assume as access already to a data base in each s= tate of Democratic primary =C2=A0voters with emails.</div><div><br></div><d= iv>By controlling who is invited helps address the troll issue.</div><div><= br></div><div>2.=C2=A0 Although the "brainstorming" phase online = will gather attention it is really the dozen "thought leaders" wh= o are chosen to prepare the report with the moderator and then present in p= erson to HRC the results that are the key. =C2=A0 We use an algorithm to cr= eate a list of potential thought leaders and then chose the actual group in= consultation with our clients.=C2=A0 This gives us an ability to weed out = potential embarrassing choices. =C2=A0 For example in NC recently for a hea= lth system one of thought leaders we were going to choose had been on sever= al reality shows.=C2=A0 The client knew this, we did not, so that person wa= s in the end not chosen.</div><div><br></div><div>3.=C2=A0 I think the pres= entation meetings offer you a chance to show case HRC in a setting she mast= ers -- thoughtful, probing back forth on issues of substance - and to do so= in a format -- not unlike the Black Lives Matter video -- where her authen= ticity shines through.</div><div><br></div><div>4.=C2=A0 Lastly we could wo= rk with you to chose former journalists to be the moderates of each particu= lar project - NH, IO, SC or Black Lives.</div><div><br></div><div>Tom c.</d= iv><div>617-529-1170</div></div> --047d7b33d828d147a0051dcfac4d--