Send this page to someone via email

Given the carnage and bloodshed in El Paso, Texas one week ago, the manifesto police believe was posted by the accused terrorist, and now the reported confession that he specifically target Mexicans, it is baffling how anyone could suggest that white supremacy is a “hoax,” as one prominent US cable news personality did this past week.

The evidence to the contrary is disturbingly overwhelming, so to what do we attribute such denial?

It could be simple ignorance. Perhaps it’s that acknowledging the problem means having a reckoning with one’s own bigotry or racism.

In many cases I suspect it’s a product of the tribalism of politics today. If there are people on the left who say that violent white supremacy is a problem, there will be some on the right who refuse to acknowledge that their political opponents might be right about something. There can be no conceding any points whatsoever.

Story continues below advertisement

It can cut both ways. Just as the political left has a blind spot when it comes to Islamic radicalism and jihadist terror, the political right has a blind spot when it comes to far right radicalism and white supremacist terror. But the reality is that both pose a threat, and both need to be treated as such.

There are some obvious parallels between jihadist terror and white supremacist terror. Both are ideologically motivated — a sort of ideology that is completely at odds with democratic, pluralistic societies such as ours. Both seem capable of targeting and radicalizing young men and spawning so-called “lone wolf terrorist.”

There are also those individuals and groups who share the goals and ideology of this movement but don’t necessarily commit acts of violence or even support of such tactics. They are part of the problem, nonetheless.

So, too, are the politicians and commentators who would pander to these elements. The hateful rhetoric expressed in the El Paso shooter’s manifesto was not all that different from the sort of rhetoric around immigration and minorities that has become, unfortunately, far too common.

WATCH: Coverage of the threat of white supremacy on Global News

Story continues below advertisement

We can debate the extent to which this threat exists, the degree to which it is worsening, or how best to address it. But there can be no denying its existence:

That list, of course, doesn’t include other attacks that authorities have managed to foil. For example, the director of the FBI recently stated that “[the] majority of the domestic terrorism cases that we have investigated are motivated by some version of what you might call white supremacist violence.”

Story continues below advertisement

Director Wray says FBI made about 100 domestic terrorism arrests this year, and a “majority of the domestic terrorism cases that we have investigated are motivated by some version of what you might call white supremacist violence.” pic.twitter.com/zc2rzT3wIc — NBC News (@NBCNews) July 23, 2019

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

It’s a troubling statistic, but it’s encouraging that law enforcement is not in denial of the problem. It’s a similar story here in Canada where we are clearly not immune to the problem, but neither are officials unaware of it. Just recently, for the first time, Canada added a white supremacist group to its list of banned terrorist organizations. That’s an important step.

Those who are trying to bring about a white ethnostate by terrorizing and targeting ethic and religious minorities — or by targeting whites who are deemed to be insufficiently committed to the cause — are indeed terrorists and should be treated as such.

It might be easier or more convenient to pretend this is not a threat.

Story continues below advertisement

The ever-growing body count tells us otherwise.

Rob Breakenridge is host of “Afternoons with Rob Breakenridge” on Global News Radio 770 Calgary and a commentator for Global News.