Hexadecibel

VIP

Hero Member



Offline



Activity: 570

Merit: 504





I still <3 u Satoshi







Human Intranet LiasonVIPHero MemberActivity: 570Merit: 504I still <3 u Satoshi Recalescence Coins Raffle! [CLOSED] [WINNER WINGSUIT!] September 14, 2013, 07:58:14 PM

Last edit: September 23, 2013, 03:28:17 AM by Hexadecibel #1



CLOSED







Thank you everyone who participated!



Drawing Starts September 22 8pm PST Via U STREAM, at which point the winner will be chosen at random from the ticket holding device.



This post will be updated to provide the link.



Ustream link:

http://www.ustream.tv/channel/recalescencecoins



list of raffle entrants:

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B7sLcZ4VNET7dmIwQ2tuUWJHX1E/edit?usp=sharing



wingsuit, Please PM me with your shipping information! Congratulations!



For those of you who missed the drawing:



http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/39149617







Thank you everyone who participated!September 22 8pm PST Via U STREAM, at which point the winner will be chosen at random from the ticket holding device.Ustream link:list of raffle entrants:, Please PM me with your shipping information! Congratulations!For those of you who missed the drawing:

Bitcoin Cash: A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash

Bitcoin Cash's White paper: Avoid the Censored /r/Bitcoin on Reddit. /r/BTC allows open discussion, and public moderation logs.Bitcoin Cash: A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cashBitcoin Cash's White paper: http://nakamotoinstitute.org/bitcoin/ Bitcoin Cash is Bitcoin.

sinner



Offline



Activity: 616

Merit: 500









Hero MemberActivity: 616Merit: 500 Re: Recalescence Coins Physcial Bitcoin Raffle! September 14, 2013, 11:39:30 PM #5 would rather see 1 BTC than 1000 mBTC.. if you're trying to distinguish yourself from Casascius, maybe make smaller denomination coins where it would make sense to list in mBTC... like 25 mBTC is better than .025 BTC

Hexadecibel

VIP

Hero Member



Offline



Activity: 570

Merit: 504





I still <3 u Satoshi







Human Intranet LiasonVIPHero MemberActivity: 570Merit: 504I still <3 u Satoshi Re: Recalescence Coins Physcial Bitcoin Raffle! September 14, 2013, 11:47:07 PM #6 Quote from: sinner on September 14, 2013, 11:39:30 PM would rather see 1 BTC than 1000 mBTC.. if you're trying to distinguish yourself from Casascius, maybe make smaller denomination coins where it would make sense to list in mBTC... like 25 mBTC is better than .025 BTC



The art distinguishes me from Casascius, mBTC just makes more sense to me at Bitcoins current value.



Smaller denominations are forthcoming 2014 though The art distinguishes me from Casascius, mBTC just makes more sense to me at Bitcoins current value.Smaller denominations are forthcoming 2014 though

Bitcoin Cash: A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash

Bitcoin Cash's White paper: Avoid the Censored /r/Bitcoin on Reddit. /r/BTC allows open discussion, and public moderation logs.Bitcoin Cash: A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cashBitcoin Cash's White paper: http://nakamotoinstitute.org/bitcoin/ Bitcoin Cash is Bitcoin.

Hexadecibel

VIP

Hero Member



Offline



Activity: 570

Merit: 504





I still <3 u Satoshi







Human Intranet LiasonVIPHero MemberActivity: 570Merit: 504I still <3 u Satoshi Re: Recalescence Coins Physcial Bitcoin Raffle! September 15, 2013, 12:25:09 AM #10 Quote from: willphase on September 15, 2013, 12:11:42 AM public notes are blockchain.info specific and cannot be added/viewed outside the blockchain.info client since they are not a part of the bitcoin protocol.



might be better to let the raffle to just take place, post the transaction, then the person who sent the winning transaction sign a message from one of the txin bitcoin addresses to prove that they entered the raffle and sent that tx.



Will



I'd like keep it as simple as possible... for me.



I'm literally putting names in a hat!



I think considering the fact that making a blockchain.info wallet is free and easy, I'll just update the OP to reflect that blockchain.info wallet must be used to add a note.



But buggers, I figured adding a note was a QT feature as well...



Cheers I'd like keep it as simple as possible... for me.I'm literally putting names in a hat!I think considering the fact that making a blockchain.info wallet is free and easy, I'll just update the OP to reflect that blockchain.info wallet must be used to add a note.But buggers, I figured adding a note was a QT feature as well...Cheers

Bitcoin Cash: A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash

Bitcoin Cash's White paper: Avoid the Censored /r/Bitcoin on Reddit. /r/BTC allows open discussion, and public moderation logs.Bitcoin Cash: A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cashBitcoin Cash's White paper: http://nakamotoinstitute.org/bitcoin/ Bitcoin Cash is Bitcoin.

Hexadecibel

VIP

Hero Member



Offline



Activity: 570

Merit: 504





I still <3 u Satoshi







Human Intranet LiasonVIPHero MemberActivity: 570Merit: 504I still <3 u Satoshi Re: Recalescence Coins Physcial Bitcoin Raffle! September 15, 2013, 12:38:56 AM #14 Quote from: Luke-Jr on September 15, 2013, 12:26:01 AM The only way to know who sent a transaction is to create a unique address for it.

If you use blockchain.info messages, you are trusting a centralised entity to tell you, and forcing your customers to use a centralised wallet.

The "sign message" feature only supports signing with addresses (ie, proving you can receive), there is no current way to sign as a sender of a transaction.

Bitcoin-Qt 0.9 will be adding support for the payment protocol to make this kind of thing simpler.



Well.. I don't fundamentally disagree with you, but a few things:



1, the address they're sending money to for the Electronic Frontier Foundation donation is a paper wallet generated offline.



2, I don't think they're technically my customers... contestants maybe?



3, blockchain.info does support sweeping private keys, but I think the sweeping of private keys was in referecnce to the destination address, which I already said was a paper wallet that was generated offline. But I have been drinking so I could be wrong.



4, I like blockchian.info...



5, I love you damn developers and all your coding hobnobery! cant wait for 0.9.

... and about 0.9... I went through a lot of freaking effort incorporating pgp signed addresses in my site. Is 0.9 pretty much going to nuke that effort? Well.. I don't fundamentally disagree with you, but a few things:1, the address they're sending money to for the Electronic Frontier Foundation donation is a paper wallet generated offline.2, I don't think they're technically my customers... contestants maybe?3, blockchain.info does support sweeping private keys, but I think the sweeping of private keys was in referecnce to the destination address, which I already said was a paper wallet that was generated offline. But I have been drinking so I could be wrong.4, I like blockchian.info...5, I love you damn developers and all your coding hobnobery! cant wait for 0.9.... and about 0.9... I went through a lot of freaking effort incorporating pgp signed addresses in my site. Is 0.9 pretty much going to nuke that effort?

Bitcoin Cash: A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash

Bitcoin Cash's White paper: Avoid the Censored /r/Bitcoin on Reddit. /r/BTC allows open discussion, and public moderation logs.Bitcoin Cash: A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cashBitcoin Cash's White paper: http://nakamotoinstitute.org/bitcoin/ Bitcoin Cash is Bitcoin.