Ready to fight back? Sign up for Take Action Now and get three actions in your inbox every week. You will receive occasional promotional offers for programs that support The Nation’s journalism. You can read our Privacy Policy here. Sign up for Take Action Now and get three actions in your inbox every week.

Thank you for signing up. For more from The Nation, check out our latest issue

Subscribe now for as little as $2 a month!

Support Progressive Journalism The Nation is reader supported: Chip in $10 or more to help us continue to write about the issues that matter. The Nation is reader supported: Chip in $10 or more to help us continue to write about the issues that matter.

Fight Back! Sign up for Take Action Now and we’ll send you three meaningful actions you can take each week. You will receive occasional promotional offers for programs that support The Nation’s journalism. You can read our Privacy Policy here. Sign up for Take Action Now and we’ll send you three meaningful actions you can take each week.

Thank you for signing up. For more from The Nation, check out our latest issue

Travel With The Nation Be the first to hear about Nation Travels destinations, and explore the world with kindred spirits. Be the first to hear about Nation Travels destinations, and explore the world with kindred spirits.

Sign up for our Wine Club today. Did you know you can support The Nation by drinking wine?

House Speaker John Boehner set the conservative blogosphere afire yesterday, when Politico’s Jake Sherman reported that the House GOP leadership would seek to reimplement popular parts of healthcare reform should the Supreme Court strike the entire law down next month. The pushback—and immediate retraction from Boehner—illustrates once again that the far right has the GOP leadership on a very short leash. Ad Policy

According to the story, Boehner briefed his colleagues on a contingency plan to reinstate both the requirement that keeps young Americans on their health insurance plans until age 26, and the laws that forbid insurers from discriminating based on pre-existing conditions. He believes that it’s “too politically risky” to rip those provisions from the law.

Boehner is quite right, but this sounds like fingernails on sheet metal to the Tea Party, which has spent the last two years fulminating about the socialistic, dictatorial, no-good, very-bad Obamacare. And the reaction from the hard right was swift.

“If this is true I have had it. I’m calling out John Boehner right now,” said powerful radio talker Mark Levin last night. “Look how fast they fold like a cheap tent.”

Daniel Horowitz at the popular blog RedState groused: “I’ve long struggled with the question of whether Republicans lack a full understanding of the free market or whether they simply lack the communication skills and fortitude to articulate free market positions to the public.”

“GOP thinking about keeping parts of ObamaCare, if you can believe it. No, no, a thousand times no,” tweeted Bryan Fischer of the American Family Association.

Within hours, GOP aides were e-mailing conservative pundits, assuring them that “Jake Sherman & Politico are liars.” And today, Boehner’s office sent out an e-mail blast titled “Anything Short of Full ObamaCare Repeal is Unacceptable.” Boehner was quoted as saying that “the president’s healthcare law is making things worse” and that “the only way to change this is by repealing ObamaCare in its entirety.… Anything short of that is unacceptable.”

But if that repeal were to happen, does Boehner still favor legislation to protect people with pre-existing conditions? He doesn’t say. Notably, even conservative stalwarts like Senator Jim DeMint and Representative Tom Price favor that. (DeMint would like to see state pools for those with pre-existing conditions, while Price has said he wants stop-gap legislation protecting those provisions should Obamacare disappear).

If Boehner does indeed want to create such legislation, does the far right object to that on principle, now that Obama has created such laws? Because Boehner is absolutely right, it’s politically dangerous to gut that, along with provisions for Americans under 26. (What if the law is repealed, does everyone age 22 to 26 suddenly lose coverage?) The GOP leadership gets that, but the opinion-makers and Tea Party firebrands don’t—and it’s clear who holds more power.