



by Deborah Dupré

Special Report, BIN Exclusive

An Indiana farmer, stalked and terrorized to ruin his life on the land for attempting not to use Monsanto’s Roundup and its genetically engineered soybeans, learned what over one million other multi-stalked targeted individuals (TIs) say they have after they were involuntarily placed on a spy hit-list: Corporations rule America and there is no justice for TIs. He also learned a shocking truth hundreds other American farmer TIs learn each year: A shadowy army of gang stalking ops are paid to terrorize innocent farmers trying to protect fellow citizens from being poisoned.

(Feature photo above credit: MonsantoMafia.com)

Farmer Rejects Playing Genetic Russian Roulette with Monsanto Mafia



Refusing to play Russian Roulette with Monsanto – the chemical giant forcing him to spray Roundup and then genetically engineer his soy crops with RoundUp Ready seeds, and risking a cancer diagnosis, as local farming friends have been, the Indiana farmer, whose name is withheld to avoid further retaliation, took a stand. According to his neighbors who recently revealed his story to Deborah Dupré, the farmer privately vowed not to use Monsanto products. In today’s surveillance-abuse nation, however, there is no privacy.

As though he’d made a public statement about his decision, he was soon followed on the road toward his crops every day. The human right to privacy has been destroyed through U.S. presidential orders and also surveillance technology, contributing to over 1 in 4 stalking victims reporting cyberstalking used against them, such as e-mail (83%) or instant messaging (35%). (1)

Although the most naive of Americans continue to deny such surveillance of innocent individuals and call the notion “nonsense,” researchers show that:

Electronic monitoring was used to stalk 1 in 13 victims.

Video or digital cameras were equally likely as listening devices or bugs [such as covertly placed in or near homes and used by stalkers near victims when they are out] to be used to electronically monitor victims (46% and 42%).

Global positioning system (GPS) technology comprised about a tenth of electronic monitoring of stalking victims. (Baum et al)

Objecting to Monsanto propaganda myths’ claims that Roundup increases yields and is cost effective, etc., the farmer continued to attempt using his right to choose whether he’d poison himself and others. He tried outsmarting his stalkers by taking different routes to his farmland. Still, he was followed, harassed and intimidated — easy for gang stalkers with GPS attached to the victim’s car and with cell phones to alert each other of the target’s precise location.

[READ: Secret Neuroweapon Attacks. Immediate Global Security Call: DARPA Scientist ]

The Monsanto Gangstalking Army

Gang-stalking, the “catchphrase” for what stalking experts call multi-stalking, has increased across the nation, according to researchers. Not only advanced communications such as the internet, cellphones and voice over internet protocol, but also American fascism, or corporatism, and acceptance of torture have accelerated growth and networking of these organized criminal groups. Few other than Tis would have believed this covert terror could happen to anyone had they not become victims themselves. It’s even tougher for single-stalked victims to get loved ones to believe them. Of course, the TI phenomenon that the U.S. created based on Nazi Germany persecution behaviors and torturous experiments is not only being applied in the U.S. The U.S. has applied it globally.

READ: NSA Whistleblower: US Has Created Nazi Germany Worldwide

Despite controversy over precise boundaries of stalking behaviors, consensus is that such behaviors can include loitering nearby, following, harassment by telephone or mail, ordering goods on the victim’s behalf, threats, physical and sexual assaults, murder attempts or actual murder. Fear that stalking victims feel is natural and can be life-saving.

Stalking findings included in the 2010 data collection, published in 2011 included:

7.5 million people were stalked in one year in the U.S.

61 percent of female victims and 44 percent of male victims were stalking by a current or former intimate partner

An estimated 15 percent of women and 6 percent of men have been a stalking victim during their lifetimes. (4)

31% of stalking victims are multi-stalked (by two or three stalkers) (5) Baum et al.

An ultra-conservative legal definition of stalking still used in the U.S. depicts stalking inaccurately. For example, survey respondents have been only classified as stalking victims if: 1) they experienced multiple stalking tactics or a single stalking tactic multiple times by the same perpetrator, and 2) they felt very fearful or believed they or someone close to them would be harmed or killed as a result of a perpetrator’s stalking behaviors. This definition fails to account for levels of fear often reported by victims (i.e. somewhat fearful, slightly fearful…). This is despite 46% of stalking victims feeling fear of not knowing what would happen next, a precursor for stalking victims’ Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (Pathé and Mullen (1997)) and other mental injuries (not mental illness as uneducated observers prefer to insinuate, and thus re-victimize stalking targets). (6)

Fear increased with every new tactic the Indiana farmer’s multi-stalkers employed against him. One study showed that over 1 in 4 stalking victims reported some form of cyberstalking used, such as e-mail (83%) or instant messaging (35%). Electronic monitoring was used to stalk 1 in 13 victims. Video or digital cameras were equally likely as listening devices or bugs to be used to electronically monitor victims (46% and 42%). Global positioning system (GPS) technology comprised about a tenth of the electronic monitoring of stalking victims.

Undeterred, the farmer tried changing his routine. He began going to work at odd hours of the night and wee hours of the morning. Frightened, he’d leave home at 2:00 or 3:00 am to try to avoid being followed.

“As interviews and reams of court documents reveal, Monsanto relies on a shadowy army of private investigators and agents in the American heartland to strike fear into farm country. They fan out into fields and farm towns, where they secretly videotape and photograph farmers, store owners, and co-ops; infiltrate community meetings; and gather information from informants about farming activities.” (7)

The most common reasons victims perceived being stalked were retaliation, anger, spite (37%), or desire to control the victim (33%) — all of which the Indiana farmer justifiably believed. Justifiably, the Indiana farmer believed the same.



“Farmers say that some Monsanto agents [stalkers] pretend to be surveyors. Others confront farmers on their land and try to pressure them to sign papers giving Monsanto access to their private records. Farmers call them the ‘seed police’ and use words such as ‘Gestapo’ and ‘Mafia’ to describe their tactics.” (8)



Monsanto typically slings financially draining lawsuits at farmers for “patent infringement.” The multinational’s “seed police” pursue and catch farmers with Monsanto’s patented seed and pollen, that drifted and contaminated organic crops with genetics from Monsanto laboratories. Every year Monsanto “investigates” over 500 farmers for patent infringement with their now-notorious “seed police.“ According to OSGATA, every year, some 144 farmers without a binding contract with the corporation have had lawsuits brought against them by Monsanto. Another 700 farmers were been forced to settle out of court for undisclosed sums.

This farmer is not the first to have been traumatized by Monsanto, as singer/songwriter Neil Young exposed in his short film about Micahel White. [WATCH: Singer songwriter Neil Young’s film, SEEDING FEAR - The Story of Michael White vs Monsanto Interview and Trailer (below)]

“Monsanto is known for bullying farmers by making baseless accusations of patent infringement,’“ said attorney Dan Ravicher of the nonprofit legal services organization Public Patent Foundation, representing plaintiffs in a 2012 suit against Monsanto. “They’ve sued and harassed many other farmers who wanted nothing to do with their genetically modified seed, and now that organic and conventional farmers are fighting back, they claim they would never do such a thing without backing up their words with an enforceable promise.“

One Missouri farmer TI Gary Rhinehart recalls a Monsanto op threatening him, “Monsanto is big. You can’t win. We will get you. You will pay.” The op then began verbal attacks, saying he had proof that Rinehart planted Monsanto’s genetically modified (G.M.) soybeans in violation of the company’s patent. “Better come clean and settle with Monsanto,” Rinehart says the man told him “—or face the consequences.”

Attempting to survive the financial burden of a lawsuit, record actions of his stalkers, missing days of work rather than face what they might do to him next, remaining in a state of hyper-vigilance as targeted individuals must to survive, and suffering trauma of 24/7 threatening intimidation, his physical and financial resources were depleted. He was forced off his land, out of his lifelong beloved career, and into dependence on one of his grown children with whom he now lives far from Indiana.

Today, Arkansas, Tennessee and Missouri farmers are reporting extensive crop damage from dicamba herbicide used on Monsanto’s latest GE soy. Particularly prone to drift into neighboring fields and onto farmers and their families, dicamba is toxic to broadleaf plants such as fruit, nuts, vegetables — and non-GE soy.

Monsanto claims to have reformulated dicamba to be less drift-prone. Pesticide Action Network (PAN) says that since EPA has not approved the new formulation, it’s the volatile, old-style version still being applied.

“And even when ‘new and improved’ dicamba is available, there’s no guarantee that the older, cheaper — and more damaging — version of the chemical won’t continue being used in the field,” says PAN.

The pesticide drift problem is no surprise. “So why are new herbicide-resistant crops — like Dow’s “Enlist Duo” (engineered for use with 2,4-D and glyphosate) and Monsanto’s “Xtend” line (resistant to dicamba and glyphosate) — approved?” asks the PAN in an email Monday.

A process is now underway to review and update national genetically engineered (GE) rules that are impacting every American family.

“Urge decision-makers to protect farmer livelihoods and community health over Monsanto’s marketshare,” asserts PAN. This problem is urgent and life threatening. PAN says, “Tell the leaders of USDA and EPA to fix their broken GE/pesticide rules, today.

“After 20+ years of Monsanto’s RoundUp Ready seeds, consequences of herbicide resistant GE crops are quite clear: super-weeds, crop damage and contamination, and increased exposure to health-harming chemicals.”

How many farmers with integrity are bullied by Monsanto thugs to the point of ruining their livelihoods? Why aren’t federal decision-makers taking a closer look at the real-world impacts of both corporate targeting of individuals and this Monsanto’s failed technology? “Under current rules, reviewers don’t even consider the spikes in pesticide use that come along with GE seeds,” states PAN.

To wit: “In 2010, President Obama announced he was recess-appointing pesticide lobbyist Islam A. Siddiqui to Chief Agricultural Negotiator, Office of the US Trade Representative. Siddiqui is Vice President for Science and Regulatory Affairs at Crop Life America, an agribusiness lobby group representing the infamous Monsanto.”

Both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are poison pushers, both joined at the hip to Monsanto. Trump holds between $15,001 and $50,000 worth of Monsanto (NYSE:MON) stock in one of his two wealth management accounts with Deutsche Bank. (11) Clinton’s ties to Monsanto run so deep, she’s dubbed the “Bride of Frankenfood” and hired a prominent Monsanto lobbyist to run her campaign. (10)

One candidate now quickly climbing in the polls, the Green Party Candidate for president Dr. Jill Stein, has strongly advocated mandating GMO food labels and says to “rein in Monsanto,” that has spent 250 million dollars on a U.S. coup. [WATCH Dr. Stein speaking at the March Against Monsanto in Tampa, FL on May 25th, 2013 (below).]

PAN asserted Monday regarding the GE/pesticide rules, “And once on the market, GE crops are never reviewed again. The way GE crops are reviewed — and approved — needs to change, now.”

It takes an army of paid criminals with impunity to ensure the poisoning of Americans by stalking the hundreds of farmers of integrity until the terror destroys them and they give up. It would take a stronger army of Americans to conquer them. It happened in the EU. It can happen the U.S.

For the sake of your children, your children’s children, that of the Indiana farmer, an estimated 3.4 million American stalking victims, and an estimated 1 million multi-stalked victims like him, take action here.

References

(1) Katrina Baum, Ph.D., Shannan Catalano, Ph.D., and Michael Rand, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Kristina Rose, National Institute of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Special Report, National Crime Victimization Survey, Stalking Victimization in the United States, January 2009, NCJ 224527

(2) Baum et al.

(3) Harmon, Rosner, & Owens, 1995; Meloy & Gothard, 1995; Mullen & Pathé, 1994; Zona, Palarea, & Lane, 1998

(4) Matthew J. Breiding et al., “Prevalence and Characteristics of Sexual Violence, Stalking, and Intimate Partner Violence Victimization – National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, United States, 2011”, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, Vol. 63, No. 8 (2014): 7; Online at Stalking Resource Center)

(5) Baum et al.

(6) Ibid.

(7) (Donald L. Barlett and James B. Steele, “Monsanto’s Harvest of Fear,” April 2, 2008; online at www.vanityfair.com/news/2008/05/monsanto200805)

(8) Bartlett and Steel

(9) Dupré, Deborah, Vampire of Macondo, 2012

(10) Mike Adams, Hillary Clinton Pushes GMO Agenda, Hires Monsanto Lobbyist, Takes Huge Dollars from Monsanto, Global Research, May 2015.

(11) Sean Williams, 3 Surprisingly Controversial Stocks in Donald Trump’s Portfolio, 2016.

Related Articles by Deborah Dupré