@Razer I latched onto you? All our previous exchanges were part of a single topic, so I guess ... sorry for engaging. I mean, honestly, if it bothers you, why respond?

Also, no one forces anyone to really read through all of one's writing. I get that not everyone is keen on reading text-walls, but by the same token, not everyone is keen on perfunctionary one-line responses either.

Anyways, I did not ignore the fact that RDR2 will be really big: "Not all of these are going to be as big as RDR2 obviously..." should have made that clear Sidenote, RDR is NOT GTA. You can keep making that comparison, sure, that is your right, and maybe RDR2 will be as big as GTAV, but unless such is an established fact, we should not all just pretend that RDR sold as well as GTAV - even on PS3/X360. RDR didn't get close to GTAV .period.

"Now i never once mentioned RDR 2 port for the Switch - but RDR 1 for the Switch would actually shift consoles,now the appeal for you may not make sense."

That's confusing because just now you complained about my textwalls. Anyways, I was obviously being to curt in my previous post: RDR1 will not be ported to the Switch. Rockstar came out and said it could not be brought to PC with resonable ressouces due to, as I said before if you had cared to read closely, its incredibly messy code base. It's simply put out of the question.

This leaves two options, I'd say, a port RDR2, which I already pointed out is unlikey for the aforemtioned reasons, or a new switch project from Rockstar within that universe, which, I also covered, by saying that Rockstar is probably going to be quite busy with bringing RDR2 to PC in the forseeable future in an acceptabl state - again something they could not achieve for RDR1 by their own admission.

All of this I did not state overly explicit, as that would have produce another ... textwall, but implicitly, yes I said all that

I will not comment about your remarks about GoW, as those seem spiteful for no good reason I can deduce.

"You seem to be acting like missing RDR 2with no alternative is totally okay when its as far from okay as can be. People will be selling their Switches to purchase that. Wait and see."

No, I'm not saying that. I'm saying that there is no real alternative here. RDR2 will not find its way to the Switch, and no, like I said, RDR1 cannot (as far as these things go) find its way to the Switch. And no, a "spin-off" project is super unlikey, if not 100% entirely impossible. It would be insane to sell your Switch for RDR2, or any such game, since any sane person must have been aware that these types of games would by and large not be covered by a portable system priced well under their competitors.

I would also contend, that this will be more of a concern of software units moved, than hardware units moved then, for the Switch. It's less about "which system to buy" rather "which game to play, aka what game to buy to play" ^^ Will people flock to Smash or Pokemon over RDR2? Depends on the gamer, but will anyone who cares about any Nintendo property sell of his Switch because of RDR2 ... possible, but I doubt that is going to be a mass-movement. How come people have not sold off their Switches en masse for MHW then? Or said God of War or Spider-Man? These games combined also made quite the sales splash together.

Sorry for the text-wall, you left me no real choice with this one. I suggest, if I should truly bother you, you say so plainly or just refrain from responding or well, feel free to ignore me. This is supposed to be a platform for conversation among people who care to do so. It should not be bothersome, nobody should feel "latched on". Have a good one!