Female-on-male sexual aggression isn’t something people take seriously, but the startling facts show that it’s far more prevalent than anyone wants to believe.

TL:DR; GMP admits that male rapes are often erased, but still not as much as MRAs say. Interestingly, it links to an alleged CDC FOIA explanation of how Genderratic’s analysis was “wrong”, which relies on the “made-to-penetrate isn’t rape” error which GMP called out in that exact same paragraph, followed by using the unreliable lifetime victimization numbers, followed by general CYA argleblarge. There are some valid statistical concerns, but the CDC’s report itself makes some of those errors, so it’s a wee bit hypocritical to be complaining about those errors in others.

[Rant]

Toy Soldiers also points out that these statistics have doubtless been mentioned on the website before, but GMP didn’t care about them until they came from what looked like a feminist source. And it doesn’t mention feminism’s role in perpetuating the gendered view of rape, or how MRAs have been trying to say this sort of thing for a while. The Ally Fogg post glosses over it as well, and the two The Atlantic articles he linked seem to be working through a feminist-apologist lens. At no point does any of the four directly mention whether feminism has helped contribute to the erasure of male rape. Even the articles someone in the comments linked to don’t say women need to help men with their sexual violence issues.

Not to mention the obligatory “male victims are erased because of misogyny” nonsense. I like the part where they assume that being “weak” and a victim is erased because it’s “feminine”, when “weak” men are generally mocked, and victimized men can be honored if they risk/sacrifice themselves in an approved way.

[/rant]