Durvelle27 It’s not that bad. Faster than a Atom plus consoles aren’t as dependent on the CPU as PCs

You are right, but the current consoles would benefit much more from a better CPU than upping GPU from this point onwards. Memory is plenty (8 Gb), but even 2 Gb more would result in much higher quality textures. Let's hope next consoles will ship with four core Ryzen, what would be reasonable to think, though the performance difference between that and the Jaguar cores is tremendous.It is sad if game's get limited by CPU power, since you really need CPU to push data for the GPU, and in many cases physics and other game logic depends on the CPU and those are the features that make many games more fun to play and what you can innovate with as a developer. Weak CPU and strong GPU just means visual fidelity, but is there any meaningful gameplay ideas to be added which utilizes today's technology with those Jaguar cores?At the same time we could get 7 nm Vega cores paired the new CPU, maybe amount of 40 or close to that in a good case. A powerful console would mean graphically intensive ports for the PC players like us and I'm all for that....On topic though, I'm considering buying this game when it gets cheaper. I like a good balance of arcade and simulation in rally games, though I found recently Dirt Rally to be an awesome experience as a pure rally simulator.