Thanks in part to the momentum that we needed to build up in order to successfully fork from BTC, we may have garnered the belief among many that BCH is to adopt aggressive new experimental and potentially wonderful features so that Bitcoin can compete with altcoins. I think we must remember that the split from BTC was based on the desire to implement scaling solutions, first and foremost set out by Satoshi's vision and original bitcoin. All other new features should be evaluated very carefully, with the same scrutiny that (dare I say it) core devs have had in the past with changes to Bitcoin codebase. BCH isn't supposed to be a bitbucket for everyone's and their dog's wish list changes for Bitcoin. It was always just about scaling via the way that has been tried and tested in Bitcoin over the last 8 years (no hard blocksize limit. Original scripting and smart contract capabilities) Remember, even some of the smarter Bitcoin core denizens used this exact reason why hard forking will fail, not immediately, but by feature bloat and scope creep, because once a hard fork is allowed then the flood gates will be opened to many many new changes that everyone wants to put in, some good, some no so good, but all it would take is one that breaks the fundamentals of bitcoin and we will have proven the core devs correct. As polarizing and as controversial a character Craig Wright may be, in a recent post he released he outlined exactly

one such potential vulnerability