AWARD-WINNING

CASINO CRYPTO EXCLUSIVE

CLUBHOUSE 1500+

GAMES 2 MIN

CASH-OUTS 24/7

SUPPORT 100s OF

FREE SPINS PLAY NOW rtised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertised sites are not endorsed bythe Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegalin your jurisdiction. Advertise here.

ABISprotocol



Offline



Activity: 278

Merit: 250



ABISprotocol on Gist







Sr. MemberActivity: 278Merit: 250ABISprotocol on Gist Re: Supporting UASF on Electrum May 30, 2017, 04:35:46 AM #2



The basis for this claim is a post from Electrum twitter at:



https://twitter.com/ElectrumWallet/status/852174246205956096



I'm not sure how easy it will be for your Electrum wallet to get connected to this so it may depend on the situation, traffic, etc.



Hope this helps! Add servers to this list if there's more that have been patched to enforce UASF. As I understand it, ecdsa.net also works to support UASF on Electrum (just in terms of selecting a server that is supporting BIP148).The basis for this claim is a post from Electrum twitter at:I'm not sure how easy it will be for your Electrum wallet to get connected to this so it may depend on the situation, traffic, etc.Hope this helps! Add servers to this list if there's more that have been patched to enforce UASF.

http://abis.io ABISprotocol (Github/Gist)

kolloh



Offline



Activity: 1666

Merit: 1020







LegendaryActivity: 1666Merit: 1020 Re: Supporting UASF on Electrum May 30, 2017, 04:41:01 AM #3 How important is it for Electrum users to forcefully select a UASF or non-UASF server versus using a randomly selected server? I suppose this really only comes into play on August 1st depending on what happens, right?

creative~mind



Offline



Activity: 56

Merit: 10







Jr. MemberActivity: 56Merit: 10 Re: Supporting UASF on Electrum May 30, 2017, 04:50:42 AM #4 Great, these guys are doing a good job, a lot of support can come through this. ⚪ Byteball (https://byteball.org/) ❱❱❱ I T J U S T W O R K S . ❱❱❱

Sending Crypto to Email - Risk-Free Conditional Smart Payments - ICO Platform with KYC

ANN THREAD (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1608859.0) TELEGRAM (https://t.me/byteball) TWITTER (https://twitter.com/ByteballOrg) MEDIUM (https://medium.com/byteball) SLACK (https://slack.byteball.org/) REDDIT (https://www.reddit.com/r/ByteBall/)

AgatioX



Offline



Activity: 546

Merit: 105









Full MemberActivity: 546Merit: 105 Re: Supporting UASF on Electrum July 03, 2017, 01:04:43 PM #6 I dont get it,if i will hodl some bitcoins before everythins will start to happen about segwits and forks on my 2.8.3 Electrum,will I get somehow both new forks of BTC?

HI-TEC99



Offline



Activity: 1918

Merit: 1157









LegendaryActivity: 1918Merit: 1157 Re: Supporting UASF on Electrum July 03, 2017, 04:45:59 PM #8 Quote from: OmegaStarScream on July 03, 2017, 04:37:17 PM Quote from: AgatioX on July 03, 2017, 01:04:43 PM I dont get it,if i will hodl some bitcoins before everythins will start to happen about segwits and forks on my 2.8.3 Electrum,will I get somehow both new forks of BTC?



As long as you are holding your private keys, you have nothing to be worried about. I'm not entirely sure but I believe you should run a full node in order to have bitcoins in both chain (If there is a chain split) and that could be profitable If done right, wait someone to confirm this information though.

As long as you are holding your private keys, you have nothing to be worried about. I'm not entirely sure but I believe you should run a full node in order to have bitcoins in both chain (If there is a chain split) and that could be profitable If done right, wait someone to confirm this information though.

I don't think you need to run a full node to spend the same coins on twice on the two chains of a fork. Nevertheless, it appears you will have to jump through some hoops to do it using electrum. The dev wrote a guide explaining the procedure in electrum. The guide was for earlier worries about a different fork that never happened. However, it should also apply to any future fork.



http://docs.electrum.org/en/latest/hardfork.html?highlight=fork

I don't think you need to run a full node to spend the same coins on twice on the two chains of a fork. Nevertheless, it appears you will have to jump through some hoops to do it using electrum. The dev wrote a guide explaining the procedure in electrum. The guide was for earlier worries about a different fork that never happened. However, it should also apply to any future fork.

AgatioX



Offline



Activity: 546

Merit: 105









Full MemberActivity: 546Merit: 105 Re: Supporting UASF on Electrum July 04, 2017, 10:23:07 AM #9 Quote from: HI-TEC99 on July 03, 2017, 04:45:59 PM Quote from: OmegaStarScream on July 03, 2017, 04:37:17 PM Quote from: AgatioX on July 03, 2017, 01:04:43 PM I dont get it,if i will hodl some bitcoins before everythins will start to happen about segwits and forks on my 2.8.3 Electrum,will I get somehow both new forks of BTC?



As long as you are holding your private keys, you have nothing to be worried about. I'm not entirely sure but I believe you should run a full node in order to have bitcoins in both chain (If there is a chain split) and that could be profitable If done right, wait someone to confirm this information though.

As long as you are holding your private keys, you have nothing to be worried about. I'm not entirely sure but I believe you should run a full node in order to have bitcoins in both chain (If there is a chain split) and that could be profitable If done right, wait someone to confirm this information though.

I don't think you need to run a full node to spend the same coins on twice on the two chains of a fork. Nevertheless, it appears you will have to jump through some hoops to do it using electrum. The dev wrote a guide explaining the procedure in electrum. The guide was for earlier worries about a different fork that never happened. However, it should also apply to any future fork.



http://docs.electrum.org/en/latest/hardfork.html?highlight=fork



I don't think you need to run a full node to spend the same coins on twice on the two chains of a fork. Nevertheless, it appears you will have to jump through some hoops to do it using electrum. The dev wrote a guide explaining the procedure in electrum. The guide was for earlier worries about a different fork that never happened. However, it should also apply to any future fork.

Thx alot!Im planning to keep some BTC amount on electrum during the fork.

But does that mean electrum isnt the best choice for holding coins during UASF UAHF times?



Wich one is OK then? Thx alot!Im planning to keep some BTC amount on electrum during the fork.But does that mean electrum isnt the best choice for holding coins during UASF UAHF times?Wich one is OK then?

HI-TEC99



Offline



Activity: 1918

Merit: 1157









LegendaryActivity: 1918Merit: 1157 Re: Supporting UASF on Electrum July 04, 2017, 01:07:01 PM #10 Quote from: AgatioX on July 04, 2017, 10:23:07 AM Quote from: HI-TEC99 on July 03, 2017, 04:45:59 PM Quote from: OmegaStarScream on July 03, 2017, 04:37:17 PM Quote from: AgatioX on July 03, 2017, 01:04:43 PM I dont get it,if i will hodl some bitcoins before everythins will start to happen about segwits and forks on my 2.8.3 Electrum,will I get somehow both new forks of BTC?



As long as you are holding your private keys, you have nothing to be worried about. I'm not entirely sure but I believe you should run a full node in order to have bitcoins in both chain (If there is a chain split) and that could be profitable If done right, wait someone to confirm this information though.

As long as you are holding your private keys, you have nothing to be worried about. I'm not entirely sure but I believe you should run a full node in order to have bitcoins in both chain (If there is a chain split) and that could be profitable If done right, wait someone to confirm this information though.

I don't think you need to run a full node to spend the same coins on twice on the two chains of a fork. Nevertheless, it appears you will have to jump through some hoops to do it using electrum. The dev wrote a guide explaining the procedure in electrum. The guide was for earlier worries about a different fork that never happened. However, it should also apply to any future fork.



http://docs.electrum.org/en/latest/hardfork.html?highlight=fork



I don't think you need to run a full node to spend the same coins on twice on the two chains of a fork. Nevertheless, it appears you will have to jump through some hoops to do it using electrum. The dev wrote a guide explaining the procedure in electrum. The guide was for earlier worries about a different fork that never happened. However, it should also apply to any future fork.

Thx alot!Im planning to keep some BTC amount on electrum during the fork.

But does that mean electrum isnt the best choice for holding coins during UASF UAHF times?



Wich one is OK then?

Thx alot!Im planning to keep some BTC amount on electrum during the fork.But does that mean electrum isnt the best choice for holding coins during UASF UAHF times?Wich one is OK then?

Any wallet that gives you control of your private keys is a good choice during a fork. Electrum is as good as any other wallet, especially considering that tutorial the dev made. Just use that tutorial if there's a fork. Any wallet that gives you control of your private keys is a good choice during a fork. Electrum is as good as any other wallet, especially considering that tutorial the dev made. Just use that tutorial if there's a fork.

johnnygeneric



Offline



Activity: 1

Merit: 0







NewbieActivity: 1Merit: 0 Re: Supporting UASF on Electrum July 09, 2017, 05:09:56 PM #11 The question I have about Electrum is will they split my existing bitcoin into Bitcoin before and after BIP148.



All the info is pretty confusing, but this has been mentioned a few times in the discussions I've followed.



If anyone knows how Electrum will handle BTC that is now in the Electrum Wallet come August 1st, let me know.



jg

HI-TEC99



Offline



Activity: 1918

Merit: 1157









LegendaryActivity: 1918Merit: 1157 Re: Supporting UASF on Electrum July 09, 2017, 05:40:26 PM #12 Quote from: johnnygeneric on July 09, 2017, 05:09:56 PM The question I have about Electrum is will they split my existing bitcoin into Bitcoin before and after BIP148.



All the info is pretty confusing, but this has been mentioned a few times in the discussions I've followed.



If anyone knows how Electrum will handle BTC that is now in the Electrum Wallet come August 1st, let me know.



jg



If you don't move your coins in your Electrum Wallet come August 1st they will be spendable on either chain (if there is a fork). However, Electrum won't split them automatically, you will have to follow the instructions on the page I linked to if you want to split them.



http://docs.electrum.org/en/latest/hardfork.html?highlight=fork If you don't move your coins in your Electrum Wallet come August 1st they will be spendable on either chain (if there is a fork). However, Electrum won't split them automatically, you will have to follow the instructions on the page I linked to if you want to split them.

aetherist



Offline



Activity: 21

Merit: 0







NewbieActivity: 21Merit: 0 Re: Supporting UASF on Electrum July 17, 2017, 10:36:41 AM #13 I state that I run BU on my server: icarus.tetradrachm.net. I would like to generalize on the question of the benefits of knowing which server you connect to. Originally, I switched. to Electrum when I read that Jaxx discouraged sending mining payments to their wallet addresses. This lead me to suspect that my Jaxx wallet would trust a central server. Since I ran a full node in any case, I decided to run electrum-server beside it, so that I could connect to my trusted full node. However, it sounds as though since electrum uses SPV which eliminates the profitability of a sybil attack, I could use auto-connect with little risk. Also, by using electrum in contrast to Jaxx, Mycelium, et. al. I connect to a full node in a more decentralized manner.