Let’s be perfectly clear: the attacks in Brussels earlier this week were a tragedy, and every bit of sympathy and goodwill the country has received is deserved. At the same time, tragedies like that one — and others far, far worse — continually go under-acknowledged. And the underlying problem is that there’s a terrible pattern as to why that happens.

As the “Tragedy World Map” above suggests, certain regions of the globe get the world’s sympathy when disaster strikes and some do not. Of course, what’s immediately apparent about the Tragedy World Map’s argument is that areas with majority white populations seem to matter more on the world stage than those with largely non-white populations.

And while that argument has proven true time and time again, there’s another map that’ll help reveal what else the Tragedy World Map is saying in perhaps an even more acute and nuanced way:

If you compare the map above with the Tragedy World Map, you’ll quickly see that the regions that receive the world’s sympathy, the regions that attract more attention, are the wealthier ones, and vice versa.

Now, sadly, a nation’s wealth is very often informed by its racial makeup for a host of complex reasons going back to the beginning of European colonialism. But no matter how you look at it, the world’s poorest nations are routinely ignored, especially when they’re in crisis — which is the case far more than we’d like to admit.

One need hardly delve at all to get but a small taste of what the world has been ignoring.