Law360, New York (October 28, 2016, 2:36 PM EDT) -- The Third Circuit on Thursday remanded an asylum case back to the Board of Immigration Appeals, finding that the board goofed on its rationale for finding that a man had failed to establish that he was Roma and on its determination on the degree of persecution that members of the ethnic group face in Bulgaria. Plamen Ayvazov received conflicting instructions from immigration judges and from the BIA as to whether he needed testimony from an expert or from relatives to establish that he was a Roma, the Third Circuit held. A determination by the board that testimony by an expert failed...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)

Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.

Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS