WASHINGTON, DC — Today, New America’s Open Technology Institute, on behalf of an international coalition of 38 civil society organizations, technology companies, and trade associations, submitted comments to the Australian Parliament expressing concerns regarding the updated version of the Telecommunication and Other Legislation Amendment (Assistance and Access) Bill 2018. If enacted, this bill will undermine encryption and threaten digital security and fundamental human rights, including the right to privacy. In August, the Australian government had released an “exposure draft” of the bill, which received approximately 14,000 comments, including earlier comments by a similar international coalition of civil society organizations, tech companies, and trade associations. On September 20, the Australian government introduced a slightly revised version of the Assistance and Access Bill 2018 in Parliament for review by the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security (PJCIS).

The coalition comments filed today include all 31 companies and organizations that joined the coalition comments in the earlier round, plus an additional 7 members. Despite the first round of comments, the coalition submission filed today explains that “the vast majority of the concerns we identified have not been addressed by the updated version of the bill.” In particular, although the draft bill states that the government may not require communications providers to create—or prevent them from repairing—“a systemic weakness or systemic vulnerability,” this language is undermined by the bill’s provisions creating powerful new tools for the Australian government. These include “technical assistance notices” and “technical capability notices,” through which the government could demand that companies weaken encryption and other security features of their products. The coalition also expressed concerns regarding the lack of adequate oversight for these new powers, the undue secrecy covering the use of the new tools, and the overbroad definition of “designated communications providers” covered by the bill.

The following quote can be attributed to Sharon Bradford Franklin, Director of Surveillance & Cybersecurity Policy, New America’s Open Technology Institute:

“It is astounding that only 10 days after the close of a public comment period in which they received thousands of submissions, the Australian government rushed forward with a slightly updated encryption bill that retains the flaws of the earlier version. The Australian Parliament should take seriously the concerns expressed by so many civil society organizations, tech companies, and others. This bill poses real threats to digital security and individual rights in Australia and beyond.”

The coalition comments submitted to the Australian government on September 9 are available here. The comments submitted today will be available after the Committee has confirmed receipt and authorized publication, per the Committee’s procedures for publication of submissions. Update 10/12/18: The comments can be viewed here.

The following list of organizations and companies joined the submission:

Civil Society Organizations:

Access Now

Advocacy for Principled Action in Government

Blueprint for Free Speech

Center for Democracy and Technology

Constitutional Alliance

CryptoAUSTRALIA

Defending Rights & Dissent

Electronic Frontier Foundation

Electronic Frontiers Australia

Electronic Privacy Information Center

Engine

Enjambre Digital

Freedom of the Press Foundation

Free Software Foundation

Human Rights Watch

International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group

Linux Australia Inc.

New America’s Open Technology Institute

Open Rights Group

Privacy International

Restore The Fourth, Inc.

R Street Institute

Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Internet Policy & Public Interest Clinic

World Privacy Forum

X-Lab

Technology Companies and Trade Associations: