I’ve been interested in the idea of genetic engineering since a relatively young age, but only recently have I performed any research or writing about it, as I did with “No, transhumanists do not support eugenics, we support super babies”. The spectre of the Nazi pseudo-science based ‘eugenics’ is not going to be erased from the world any time soon, especially in a world where not only racism is still alive and well, by humanity is inventing new and creative forms of discrimination around permitted sexualities, politics and technology. So why in such a world could genetic discrimination possibly be a good thing? Enter Gattaca.

Gattaca depicts a creative futurist apparent dystopia in which those with the best genes are privileged over those who do not. The tale follows our protagonist, who when denied his dream of entering the popular regular space programme, goes to great lengths to beat the system set against him.

Interestingly, Gattaca never suggests that the regime in place is based on pseudo-science, or is a malicious policy instrument in order to create an oligarchy of the genetically elite. Instead we’re presented with only the fact that a high level of physical and genetic fitness is required to enter the space programme. The protagonist demonstrates he knows know to go the extra mile in physical exertion by remembering as a child, he could beat his brother in a race out of sea so long as he didn’t conserve enough energy to swim back safely.

That’s great kid, believe in your dreams! Wait, you’re not a child risking you and your brother’s life any more over an irresponsible game, you’re about to head into a hostile environment known as space where you will be often be physically and mentally tested, and the lives of dozens or more people will be at risk if you can’t give the needed performance. But that’s okay, because you deserve it because genetic discrimination is literally Hitler.

Bioethicist James Hughes had similar issues with this premise, and Gattaca itself has been incredibly societally influential on real world regulations around genetic testing, in case it is a slippery slope towards discrimination by insurance companies.

I am concerned about the potential of the misuse of genetic information once held by private companies and governments, but this is from a privacy point of view, that the people with information are empowered, and those who sell it may be the product.

The idea that genetic testing is evil may be starting to subside with the rise of 23andMe — even though you may have to take high levels of precautions to not give up your genetic privacy.

The idea that we must embargo studying our personal genetic makeup, something that could to lead happier and healthier lives, and even to influence our career choices — is not one I agree with.