SEC Confirms That Bitcoin Savings & Trust Was A Ponzi Scheme; Files Lawsuit

from the seven-percent-per-week-interest-is-a-bit-unbelievable dept

Ironically, investors who had simply bought and held bitcoins during the period the alleged Ponzi scheme was in operation would have made a killing. While one bitcoin was worth about $6.56 on average between September 2011 and September 2012, they were valued Tuesday at $95.30 each.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community. Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis. While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

A little less than a year ago, an operation called the Bitcoin Savings & Trust (an updated name from what had been the "First Pirate Savings & Trust") shut down suddenly , right after there was growing evidence that it was a pyramid scheme -- or, as some called it, the Bernie Madoff of Bitcoin. The "deal" promised an insane 7% interest. If you know even the slightest thing about compound interest (or can use a calculator for a few rounds), you'd recognize that'sand obviously unsustainable in any real world situation.The guy behind it, who went by the name pirateat40, insisted it was no such scheme, and that people would get their money back. In fact, he claimed "once my process is released you'll understand more of how coins move around." Well, a month later the SEC officially began investigating , and along with a big lawsuit against Trendon Shavers (aka pirateat40), thehas now "released" his process , and it sure does look quite a lot like a Ponzi scheme.The exhibits (many included below -- and others found at the RECAP case docket ) include a number of public forum statements made by Shavers, many of which appear to be outright lies, especially when asked how people can tell this wasn't a giant pyramid scheme. In one forum discussion, someone points out that this sounds a lot like an "HYIP scam" -- a High Yield Investment Program scam -- which have been popping up here and there. And Shavers insists that if that were true, people would have figured it out already:The SEC issued an "investor alert" to go along with the lawsuit, warning about ponzi schemes using virtual currency. Of course, it's not clear that this really has anything to do with it being "virtual currency." There are ponzi schemes with all sorts of currency. Either way, the real irony may be that those who chose not to invest with Shavers and to justclearly were better off not just because they still had their Bitcoins, but because the (wildly fluctuating) value of Bitcoins rose even higher than the insane interest promises

Filed Under: bitcoin, bitcoin savings and trust, ponzi scheme, pyramid scheme, sec, trendon shavers