This debate between Maureen Dowd, Camille Paglia and very feminist woman who’s name I don’t remember said in opening monologue in a conference on whether men are necessary at all.

It is well known and parts have been discussed here.

I want to discuss the opening remark of the ultra-feminist.

In it she says that not only does she think that feminism and taking care of men are necessary but that she is not going to “let men off” from their responsiblities.

She doesn’t know it yet but she’s saying that going your own way is such a superior position that she, as a feminist, will not allow men to just “go their own way.

Here’s the except from the ultra-feminist.

Think about it. Do women gain anything from men becoming obsolete? If we are the only ones

triumphing in work and education, and the economy and politics and business, but yet we still

retain our old kingdoms of homemaking and child-raising, do we win? No. Because if that

happens, then we will be doing everything! And I don’t know about you, but I’m quite

knackered. The question is, are men obsolete? And my conclusion to this question is: “No, I

won’t let you be, you f~~~ers! We are going 50/50 in this world, goddammit, or I’ll never have

the chance to watch the Breaking Bad boxset!”

https://www.munkdebates.com/MediaStorage/Debates/EndOfMen/Docs/EndOfMenTranscript.pdf?ext=.pdf