I and many others believe that the youtuber "Pyrocynical" [His channel is at this address: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCN5xN8gIljvWYnsj06V8WbQ shouldn't be unrightfully taxed revenue for using a sony from and group which allowed it which also just happens to be using a clip from a old song called "la vie en rose" by Grace Jones. And they at most used a 51 second clip and transformed it into a 2 minute and twelve second song.They added lyrics to the song and changed the feel of the song and physically slowed it down.This makes the content transformative .This also doesn't harm the original creator as it doesnt outright use there full content and only a clip of it. However it DOES harm Pyrocyincal as it has demonetized FOUR YEARS of original content that had a brief clip of whitewoods beach walk.There was also an agreement between whitewoods and pyrocyincal that Pyrocyincal could use the song.