Rumor has it, Snopes doesn’t consider forced anal and/or oral penetration on a 5-year-old Rape. On August 4th 2016, Bretibart revealed during an exclusive interview some shocking new details on the Migrant rape case from Twin Falls Idaho. During the interview, and in court, it was revealed the migrants both orally and anally penetrated the 5-year-old girl. Snopes says that this is not rape, so what is it? Perhaps Snopes believes 5-year-old children can give sexual consent as I see no other reasonable explanation:

Yet it was revealed in court on August 2nd that the migrants penetrated the child both orally and anally:

“New allegations against a ten-year-old boy who was involved in the June 2 attack were revealed in court on Thursday afternoon, alleging the boy both anally and orally penetrated the five-year-old” – Breitbart

According to dictionary.com, the definition of rape is:

This means that Snopes is slandering a 5-year-old American Child for the benefit of the democratic party. Snopes is quick to throw a 5-year-old child under the bus for a 10-year-old child that wasn’t even born here. How Un-american, and how extremely evil. Rumor has it, Snopes needs to get some new writers.

Not the first time Snopes has slandered a child for the benefit of the Democratic Party

Here’s another great one from everyone’s favorite satire fact checking site. Snopes ran this piece a few months ago:

Snopes was quick to claim:

Yet in the newly released Clinton files, you can clearly hear Clinton laugh about the incident, border-line volunteer, and even say she lost faith in lie detector tests because he passed. Snopes even admits this later in the article, but still claims Clinton didn’t know he was guilty. Anything they can do, even if it’s attack children, to spew their democratic satire fact checking upon the masses of mindless liberals:

Well now, rumor has it, Snopes is full of Sh*t! SHOCKING!!!