I would like to take the opportunity here to officially state that I do not, in any way adhere to or subscribe to this silly and obscure MGTOW “manifesto” that tradcon imbeciles have been passing around for the last few months or so to try to convince themselves that MGTOW as it exists today is not the result of excellent youtubers like Spetsnaz or Stardusk, but is instead a result of some obscure “founders” that haven’t done anything significant in the MGTOW community for years.

I will reproduce parts of the manifesto below and add commentary where needed.

The goal is to instill masculinity in men, femininity in women, and work toward limited government! By instilling masculinity in men, we make men self-reliant, proud, and independent. By instilling femininity in women, we make them nurturing, supporting, and responsible. By working for a limited government, we are working for freedom and justice.

Already we see a problem here, what exactly does “working toward limited government” entail? who is the arbiter or overseer of this? Is there some decider ready to tell us we are not real MGTOW if say, we want less government involved in the regulation of drug use but more government involvement regarding climate change? Is working toward limited government a euphemism for having to take on the persona of various batshit right wing personalities that regard anyone left of Ayn Rand as a communist socialist infiltrator? Do we have to join the defeat the left crusaders to be considered MGTOW by right wing religionists? When does one have to stop pursuing limited government? under this definition anyone short of an anarcho capitalist that wants the complete dissolution of government is not “working toward limited government” and thus cannot be a MGTOW.

There’s also this bit of nonsense…

The goal is to instill masculinity in men, femininity in women, and work toward limited government!

By instilling masculinity in men, we make men self-reliant, proud, and independent.

By instilling femininity in women, we make them nurturing, supporting, and responsible.

How about we let men decide what masculinity is for themselves instead of a “manifesto” telling us that some founding fathers of MGTOW have to “instill” it into us? one of the major reasons men are in the problems they face today is because they let everyone else, that is women, other men as well as emissaries of the state tell them what masculinity is supposed to be instead of allowing them to figure it out for themselves, because of this we have feminists and traditionalist women and neomasculinity snake oil salesmen all attempting to tell men what they need to do to be men and frankly not a single one of them know what the fuck they’re talking about.

Furthermore, notice that it is clearly defined here in the manifesto that one of the key missions of MGTOW is to “instill femininity in women” Ask yourselves this gentleman, when you think of MGTOW how many of you equate it, even in the slightest sense with having to fix women’s supposed deficiencies in femininity? Does that sound right to you? that in order to be a MGTOW we have to minister to women and slowly reintroduce them back to being nice and submissive again? Does that sound like MGTOW to you?

You know, it’s incredible that most of the people bringing up this manifesto love to call MGTOW a cult, and yet they’re appealing to some ancient internet blog that gives us a manifesto, telling us what the goals of MGTOW are. Think about that for a second, they call us a cult, for not adhering to a manifesto.

They call us a cult for not adhering to a manifesto.

Women having “other qualities” is not interesting to men because we don’t need them! Femininity will be the price women pay for enjoying masculinity in men!

This is the aim of “Men Going Their Own Way”. By holding this point of view, we are helping other men and, more importantly, we are helping boys grow up to become men. This goal is to take away everyone’s “right” to vote on other people’s affairs thus rendering it impossible for political organisms and ideologies to impose their personal will on everyone else. It is not about reinstalling patriarchy or revoking female voting rights or making socialism illegal. It might have this as a side effect – but not directly and not as a political ideology. Only the future will show what happens and by going our own way we are preparing men and boys for that future.

And here we see more holding masculinity for ransom type behavior, they claim that “Femininity will be the price women pay for enjoying masculinity in men!”

These men, they may have created the MGTOW name, but all that they really want to do is beg women to straighten up and act like good little girls again. Here’s an idea,

MGTOW don’t very much care what women do, and if women don’t want to be feminine, then good, who are you to try to impose your definition of how female human beings should act on them?, the women who wish to be feminine can, the ones who do not wish to should not, my only real beef with women is when they try to do unethical shit to men. I don’t care that Andrea Dworkin saw men as inherently animalistic and prone to rape, I care that she and her feminists cohorts abused the legal process in an unethical way in order to inject their prejudice into law and that women, on the whole, did almost nothing to stop it.

I am fine that women have ideas that stereotype men, I am NOT fine with legislating those stereotypes into law at the detriment of men. I myself have plenty of stereotypes against women, I simply have no desire to force the government to make my stereotypes against women a self fulfilling prophecy. If the stereotypes have any merit to them, they will make themselves apparent without any government intervention at all,

I am not on some mission to control female behavior, I don’t feel like communally frothing at the mouth and declaring war against social justice warriors or the “lack of femininity in women” every time Laci Green grows out her armpit hair, I don’t care if women have abortions and I’m not trying to stop them. I don’t care about instilling femininity in women, and I never will,

Again, the manifesto states,

It is not about reinstalling patriarchy or revoking female voting rights or making socialism illegal. It might have this as a side effect – but not directly and not as a political ideology.

I want to highlight this because it’s very important that we understand what they just did here with this statement, essentially, they’ve stated,

-Well, MGTOW isn’t about going back to the patriarchy or some silly never ending fight against supposed all pervasive socialism, buuut we’re going to do all of these things that will probably lead back to that, and if it does, well at least it wont be done via political means… –

As if that makes it any better, as if destructive misandry is incabable of manifesting in the universe without the help of government, as if going back to patriarchal gender roles where men were treated as unthinking automatons designed for work and not very much else is an acceptable sacrifice for implementing their silly Jurassic vision of MGTOW. Then they speak of revoking female voting rights… another pie in the sky platitude that would never happen in western civilization, another pipe dream of the delusional small government at all costs acolyte.

It is important for men to have a practical approach to implementing our strategies. PRIME STRATEGIES FOR ACHIEVING OUR GOALS We have 3 main strategies: 1. Instilling masculinity in men by: – Demanding respect for men

– Serving as good male role models

– Living independent lives

– Fighting chivalry 2. Instilling femininity in women – We will hold women equally accountable to men and ignore and shun those who refuse to take any responsibility for their own circumstances. Thus we induce women to take a complementary position with men instead of a competitive position, as is now the case. Feminine qualities we want from women:

– Nurturing

– Supportive

– Responsibility

– Respectfulness

– Honesty

Ahh and more of the “women are complementary to men” narrative, it doesn’t matter that if women were our natural complementary partners then they wouldn’t have signed on to feminism in the first place, it doesn’t matter that in a sexually dimorphic species, that which is X in one sex of that species does not necessarily translate to the opposite of X in the other gender, I suppose the Irish Elk that went extinct because the females wanted such large antler racks on the bulls that the males couldn’t keep up with consuming enough calcium to generate them without starving, I suppose those female Irish elks were “naturally complimentary” to their male counterparts too, it just happened to cost them the existence of their entire species, but no matter, anything that women want in men must be good for men because it’s “complimentary”, male genital mutilation must be good if women are sexually selecting for cut penises. If women take to selecting men that are prone to violence for reproduction, well then, it must bode well for the human species because they are our “natural counterparts” and are only doing whats best for us after all. Because women would never act in their own interests without regard to what men want right?

Right?

Oh yeah that’s right, this was universally the case before a band of fabian jews beamed their marxism voodoo magic into their heads. That’s right folks, women are now in a “competitive position” with men, and where a simple explanation of self interest and human nature will suffice as an explanation, we will instead blame government because they did this to them… Bad evil socialism bad!

Gentleman It is time we relegate this silly manifesto to the pages of history, and I am doing so here and now, unequivocally and without hesitation.