Introduction

This information is for readers who want to see a better world by seriously asking themselves what is the cause of world problems and how to get rid of them. Readers who have even thought of revolution but are not too sure what it is and how to go through the process of being part of a movement for revolution that is successful without having to implement a one man dictator in a political process that drains societies, even with its differences from other political systems in some levels.

I don’t agree with how society is presently organized. This is not because it is a life of discomfort and misfortune. Well, it is for half of the planet, even while there are ways many people are dodging the bullets in different levels. I was illusioned by other forms of solutions in the past, and want to introduce a different way of thinking regarding the problems we have, and the solution that can put an end to the chaos of imperialism.

We have read about the rise and fall of different systems throughout history and different corners of the world. It is time to re-think of a system less grounded in politics, which gave rise to imperialism in the first place. Socialism became a system fighting capitalism, but failed due to the dangerous whirlpools of imperialism.

Capitalism-Imperialism

Some major problems (aside from the minor ones that are of equal concern) goes back to history: the “discovery” of America until now: slavery in the U.S turning to slavery internationally; the wiping out of Native Americans- though still taking place along with the murdering, incarceration and torturing of immigrants, blacks, the mentally ill or other marginal groups- are now much more expansive with the wars that it wages; other issues are the constant destruction of the environment, denying abortion rights, sex trafficking, deportations and borders.

These are all issues rooted in Capitalism-imperialism. These historical major issues has hidden current social problems very well through its expansive system, media distraction and choosing the reality that benefits the ruling class, such as going to war because there are drug gangs, but not mentioning how that even became a problem in the first place.



There are liberals who have an understanding of the realities I speak of, but are instantly programmed to look for reforms. First, however, there must be a closer look at the dynamics of capitalism-imperialism before trying to change it. That puts us to question on whether the reform that is required to get rid of all these horrors is actually possible within the system itself, also examining other common solutions that don’t get to the heart of solving the real problem. That brings to surface what will bring about these changes, and how can we seize that opportunity to actually implement the necessary changes for the well-being of people and the planet. That will also bring readers to analyse what changes should take place, even considering the transition process for the re-organization of society.



First we would have to disregard the myths surrounding the problems of this system, unless this inclines readers to examine it further, due to questions that arise. The challenge is not just finding research that gets into the reality of things, but also actually gets to work on solving it by finding that cure, not just finding a temporary relief. Usually, I have found, through the research and experience I personally have so far, is that most of the time the information is a small piece of a large puzzle. That’s ok, depending on what you are looking for.

If you are searching for answers that are aligned with the cause of world problems and actually getting rid of them, that’s a bit more tricky. You won’t really find it unless it’s coming from another political system that is competing with the one we have now, as I mentioned in the beginning when I brought up socialism. But in going to work on this question, it is important to know how solutions will be successful in the long run.

Limitations to The New Synthesis of Communism

Being successful in the long run is actually a major necessity to thinking of social solutions. Ardea Skybreak, who is an RCP (Revolutionary Communist Party) member, speaks about this in one of her book, "Science and Revolution". She speaks of people who view solutions in the immediate sense, such as reformers. The problem, however, is that communism is also an immediate sense of solutions, (even if it is not as immediate as reform and other common solutions) which I’ll explain eventually. And when I say Communism, I mean the process of going from Capitalism to Socialism to Communism under a specific leader. I know people define terms differently and might believe in Communism but not under Bob Avakian.

The New Synthesis of Communism is a political ideology that tries to make it popular among the liberal masses. The problem is that it still has religious tendencies (even if it says that it breaks off from that past communist approach) in the sense that it makes the youth give their life to what “humanity needs”. This does a lot of psychological and even physical damage due to control and verbal abuse (for those who experience it, which is usually those who are challenged to enter the vanguard).

This means having little consideration to their personal problems, jobs, family and other factors. Of course you will get potential vanguards who come in carefree and excited about the materials and cause, to becoming aloof and drained or too robotic and cold. They might have a lot of initiative at first, but then either stop participating or not perform with quality or caring to speak out anymore. This can be true about any political organization. However, because of how they are organized, people being aloof to them is almost equivalent to being send to "hell".

They say things like, "well, at least you respond," if they are disappointed with how little you are all of a sudden doing, or "well at least she didn't leave," if they hear of a constructive criticism that you mention as if the only reason you are bringing in a genuine concern is only because you are full of yourself and expect them to do all their work. They fail to miss the point because they are too much in the matrix of, "I'm doing this for humanity, you should too." In this movement, on the other hand, there should be a means of listening and respecting people's boundaries. There should be structure and responsibility but not in a mechanical way. There will be roles and responsibilities but that should be naturally unleashed and not controlled.

Some respond to this with, "is not about you," or, "stop thinking about the individual and start thinking about humanity," among so many other harmful, manipulative and controlling talk. They even say things like, "not everyone has to like each other, " as if that is the only reason that someone brings up a very well concerned critique about the right method and approach.

It's almost like comparing it to their counterpart, which is the system they are fighting, and seeing how many corporate people or politicians (as a small example) might start off good hearted and either simply wanting to make money for survival reasons or trying to make a difference, to becoming a monster they didn't imagine becoming.

This is what makes them very similar to the U.S military (though they are revolutionaries for Communism), even if it has a different method and approach to capitalism. Though they say they don’t put pressure on people to join the movement if they are not ready, they put pressure on the vanguard to bring others into the movement in a more serious way. This creates social antagonism because people are not approached the right way due to the pressures and anxiety that some leaders of the vanguard go through in meeting this mission, along with other responsibilities of the organization.

The exception to this are people who get support from those who take constructive criticism well without taking it personal. Some forge real friendships because of this support and are therefore more inclined to get deeper in the movement, though that is not a good reason to stay in something, if you think about it. It’s like comparing it to the conventional society of the workplace: people might want to stay in their jobs because they fall in love with their co-workers, but eventually you are going to be faced with the challenge of finding a different job that will get more out of you in the sense of what you are trying to accomplish and how that organization is aligned with making that a reality.

Now, of course, changing the world is a completely different ball game, but it is still similar in some respects. The difference is in what you are trying to accomplish. When people are drawn to social movements, they are thinking about what organization is actually accomplishing what they want to see accomplished, whether it is in the immediate sense of helping victims or the bigger picture of how their society is organized, the way I try to address here.

People entering the movement for a communist revolution, who genuinely want what is best for humanity, go along with it because they are trained to believe that they just have to put time to dig into material whenever they get the chance to, if their personal concern is that they don’t know enough. But the real reason for this is that they need a vanguard that is willing to give their life so that the party can take state power.

Some in the party might genuinely want to liberate humanity, but have engaged in the new synthesis for so long that they believe this is the way out. The same might even go for Bob Avakian himself (the leader) who was wrangling with ideas such as communism in the 60’s, and was inspired to use that framework but mold it to a better one in theory: analyzing past mistakes and accomplishments but keeping the communist method and approach (hence the term New Synthesis of Communism).

The problem is not so much what it appears on the surface, such as focusing so much on Bob Avakian as a figure, and not giving the youth time to dig into necessary material, but then expect them to do backbreaking work. This was one of the problems of past communist revolutions that concerns the masses. It is partly what led some vanguards to make grievous mistakes due to the stress and pressures of their mission, and not having room to reflect. Although they want to transform people, their ideologies leaves room for antagonism because of what people learn about communism based on the view of the ruling class.

The youth don’t know how to handle that pressure, so they resort to being defensive rather than respond with intellectual materials that they don’t completely understand themselves (even those who have been around long enough to know by now, and even those who point the finger at others to do it but don’t know that much themselves). But even if you improve those conditions, there is a deeper problem.

The main problem being the extreme challenges of actually competing with imperialists. That is something to take very seriously rather than put pressures on the youth to meet demands without educating them. But even if they do go to work on this in a deep foundation, which it seems like they are doing now that Trump is in office, the real challenge is dialectical materialism (things changing with time- both in the challenges and how to deal with them). Because it is hard to say what challenges will come next, it still leaves people in a socialist society unprepared anyway. This is one of the vulnerabilities of reverting back to capitalism if you are in the constant whirlpool of imperialism (even if you say you are trying to defeat capitalism to liberate people, and only if those people ask for help).

That is why Bob Avakian even said that ‘the vanguard of the future’ (what he says the new synthesis of communism should inspire the next vanguard to become) will be a residue of the past (commit the same mistakes, even if they are different in scope). He says this and the communist vanguard still don’t pay attention, which is the same way this system lies to the masses in their face while admitting to it at the same time (a line I observe Bob Avakian use to point the finger at capitalism but does himself).

He also responds to minorities who say they want to work on themselves first before thinking of world solutions by saying, “good luck. That will take longer.” Not to mention an audio of him actually competing with Jesus. I mean first of all, most atheist believe he’s a mythical figure. Why not just focus on how religion is oppressive if that is what you are trying to accomplish? Perhaps because he wants to be adored much more?

This explains, not only an underlying reason to the cult reputation, but why vanguards compete with each other much more than they actually work with each other: They are so concerned about people having the right epistemology, that they lose some sense of morality. This is why the party even felt inclined to create principles way after damage is done, which does not prevent more damage from being done due to how they are organized from this communist method and approach (leaders who are sick of sacrificing so much for the cause who expected to be in a higher position by now but now have to 'correct' some of the mistakes that others do, for example, which requires them to step down in status, so use the wrong approach on who they are suppose to be guiding because of this frustration).

Principles is also much deeper than just not spitting out inappropriate terms. Though verbal language is important, the act of degradation, even simply in a verbal sense, goes deeper than just insults: it’s about how you treat people like property, which to their surprise, that’s how they treat each other, especially when they follow some pyramid structure on respecting those who have been around the longest (by respect I mean the simple act of listening and having a dialogue outside of pure assumptions).

They are programmed to believe they are doing work for humanity, so they should suck it up no matter what the challenges are (no time to reflect and a consideration to the challenges; Just an assumption of what the challenges might be and how they should easily overcome it). And if anyone brings up an issue, they treat that person like a child that either needs to be lied to, manipulated, ignored or walk around like egg shells.

It gets as bad as jeopardizing employment and then pressuring them to find another job quickly if the material contradiction is finances or else they just simply feel sorry for themselves, or others assumptions. Not to mention that "stop patriarchy", which is under their umbrella, can use some of people's trauma (for those who confide in them by opening up) as a means to be dictated through a number of assumptions based on their past, if they ever join the club, which negates their philosophy of dialectical materialism.

Their main fault in philosophy is that there is only one truth. This completely negates the reality that there are different dynamics at work, so their process of "transforming" people is very linear because they focus so much on that "one truth", despite they preach about their process being nonlinear and considering the dynamics. Their philosophy that reality is not determined by what most people think, is also a great way to manipulate the masses into thinking that they have the token to truth, whether people agree with them or not. Though there is truth to the fact that most people are not grounded by reality, that reality must still be analyzed deeply. By not understanding that, they fail to really work with people.

If you think about it, in some level, some understand that what they are fighting for is not the entire truth, which explains why they use control as such a popular method to bringing people in and keeping them. To some extend, they might do this because they think most people will not join unless its behind a facade of using other social issues that brand them with another name under their revolution movement. But even if this is the case, if they were so confident about their revolution being the truth, they would more easily recruit people without these false methods and sense of manipulation and control.

Another example is even controlling how someone eats because she is overweight and implying that her health/life is important because they might not be able to recruit others as deeply as she is involved (since she is living in the club house and not working b/c she has devoted her whole life to the cause). They even control romances because they fear that their love life will get in the way of the cause. Talk about toxic. Everything else like travels, the kind of job that you should get if you are going to work, you name it. Again, they might not do this to ordinary supporters, but they will definitely do it to the vanguard who has the responsibility to fight at the end and possibly take state power.

Imagine that? imagine someone in those conditions actually deciding the fate of the masses? well, it has happened before in history, hasn't it? and we already read and heard the results of that. This is not to imply that the distorted version of communism under the elite is all accurate. This is to imply the reality of the whole of history, which you can't justify for personal gain without being sure that it won't happen again just because you put the word "new" before communism. The point is that the organization ( the WAY it is organized) and the same communist method and approach under one leadership is still the same and will therefore have the same consequences.

The contradiction is that there is a bigger enemy out there: those who prefer to keep capitalism intact and even expanded further. Nonetheless, because the RCP want state power, others need to be organized to prevent them from doing so. Even if what they are trying to fight into being seems “better”, in the long term, is actually not what humanity needs.

That doesn't mean the RCP and Bob Avakian haven't done some interesting work regarding problems and solutions both in theory and practice, especially by Avakian himself (and mostly by him, which is part of the problem) but by Raymond Lotta in analyzing the anarchic conditions that make it impossible to reform Capitalism because of its very nature. Ardea does an interesting job in the beginning of Science and Revolution but then she ends with what appears to be simply adoring Bob Avakian and how the youth in the club should respond with when someone calls them a cult.

I get that Avakian has done some ground breaking work, but the way he is presented along with how club members and some party members are treated, it's just not right. And when she talks very briefly about Communism, she does so in a rude way to people who don't understand the full story, without even really educating readers on some of those realities. It's sort of , "just take my word of it," like a lot of them do. The International Communist Party itself rejects organization by a leader. We do need leadership regarding theory and organization, but not the way that is programmed under Avakian.

This is one of the things to watch out for. This is a way to think critically, with epistemology and morality for the planet in the long run, not just for a period of time so that a system can prove they can do better the third time around. Humanity doesn’t have time for that. In this light, there are other groups to watch out for that appear a certain way in the outside but are not really grounded on the necessary foundation for the wellbeing of everyone. This can be something of an ongoing discussion for those who are looking into different things. Understanding myths surrounding the real problem does help negate groups who say they have the way out.

And though this manifesto "renounces" Communism (at least in the way it is organized under single leadership such as Avakian), it is intrigued by a lot of what is laid out by the International Communist party regarding revolution, the proletariat, helping other countries, and the transition process both in production and in non-monetary distribution. Their means of helping others is through military aide, which is why this constitution gives room for groups who want to help in the military sense. The point, however, is not to have an extended army to an extreme where we are constantly in competition with other imperialists and wasting the economy on it. This contradiction can continue to be debated.

Understanding the Real Problem imbedded in Capitalism-Imperialism



Most people believe the problem with social inequalities has to do with the upper class; racism comes from the white race; patriarchy comes from men; homophobia comes from religion, and xenophobia comes from nationalism. Although there is truth to this, it is also more complex. For example, we’ve all heard the stories of Europeans invading the West. Although this should be taken seriously, it is not as complex as them plotting to do what they have unraveled. Their navigation was simply a route, not originally for economic expansion (maybe more like immediate personal gain at first), but out of desperately coming out of their own economic downturn of medieval society.

Not to mention that medieval society was not about race but about class. It had a caste system, and somebody had to do the groundwork. It was not until the slavery system was created that the idea of race became an issue. This, however, was a means of maintaining slavery, which could only be done if the white race saw Africans as inferior. Therefore, there were ideas & philosophies (even the much later theory of Darwin’s natural selection) that “justified” (even if it wasn’t grounded on reality) the means of exploitation on the basis of profit. This is one of the reasons that racism is not innate but a social condition and the real reason for social antagonism today.

The complexity of capitalism expansion is more complex than to simply brand it as globalization, even though that is a problem. The question is in how this system operates. Many people blame wall street, secret societies, and the 1%. In reality, they are just simple decors to a rotten system. They do contribute, but are not necessarily the cause of the problem. The reason it seems like they are is because most people view them as owning the means of production and the ones running the show behind political figures. There is some truth to that, but the dynamics of imperialism is still much more dynamic, lively and complex. Viewing the problem this way is too mechanical. And actually not understanding it as accurately is partly the reason systems fail. But of course I’m not trying to “rescue” this system. I think any system that rests on exploitation, oppression, and plunder of the planet, must go.

Limitations of Non-Profits



Non-profits help the marginal and victims of a system’s problem (at least the ones who come from sincere individuals and not the ones that are government functions made to believe they are helping, but in reality are just another branch to the problem). This can- and have- restored community problems. However, by not stopping the cause of the current system’s problems, it continues to surface individuals affected, who might not get the help and service they need (for different reasons), and can therefore contribute to community problems much further: theft, rape, terrorism, etc. Most importantly, the system itself continues to get away with the problems that arise from it, which is more dire than what individuals do. Instead of confronting this reality, however, some people running this system, especially the fascists, just want more punishment, which is not only not curing the problem, but making it much more severe.

Limitations of Sustainable Communities

Developing sustainable communities is something that can be done (and should be done) when re-organizing society, but it will not be the direct tool of change under the current system if only done by individuals or small groups of people, who eventually hit limitations when it comes to how the system currently runs. In other words, the U.S military will continue going to war no matter how many sustainable communities there are. Now I know the idea for those who think of this solution (which I thought at one point myself) is to take away the finances that makes the military and other things function. However, it doesn’t work due to the dynamics of capitalism-imperialism: all its functions and how it is supported in many levels through all the institutions in society.

The ideal situation would be for everyone to stop what they’re doing and take matters into their own hands. However they have to be prepared for that in both the repercussions of the government going brutally down on the people and also in reorganizing society the way they want it to, which again, is the point of why I write this information. This brings to light another common solution: anarchy.

Limitations to Anarchy

Anarchy is rooted in no longer needing a sate. Though I understand its nature to a certain extent, hence how I created my own idea for reorganizing society. However, there must be a society that is organized in obtaining their needs for survival. The pure motion of anarchy is unrealistic. People can create eco-economies and communities without being fully in the mix of how their society is originally designed (with their choices of how to be in the mix and how not to) but not entirely free of restraints (not because politics say so, but because nature and our bodies itself says so. The exception was our native ancestors, the cavemen of a past time. And although we need a reverse in how society is organized for different concerns, it will not be realistic to go all the way back to this time.

There can be individuals who migrate from community to community, but their survival will still depend on communities, even if it’s temporary. And for those who are part of society more directly still have to deal with the challenges of social antagonism, being defended from terrorism (not defined the way this society defines it), and other things that will allow society to function with well-being.

To understand the current system, the question should be more focused on how the system runs within the society itself, and how it constitutes things that give rise (such as individuals who own private property for example) to how the system is organized. Now of course work must be done in understanding what this system is outside our current constitution. There were and are major problems that arose from the constitutions throughout centuries, but our constitution is influenced by the system that runs it. Hence the reason the constitution can be bended with reforms, civil rights laws, and loopholes that some industrialists and politicians find to get away with breaking constitutional laws.

Limitations to Reforms

This points back to Marx and the work others have done in analyzing what Marx tries to convey in the the capita volumes. One of the RCP members, Raymond Lotta, who is a political economist, takes a shot at analyzing this in his online article, "On the 'Driving force of Anarchy' and the dynamics of change". He analyses a key theme of how this system operates.

He states, “The dynamics of capitalism is not one in which the capitalist strives to maximize surplus labor according to his own desire for profit. It is not a dynamic in which the capitalist has the freedom to invest or not to invest, save for the limiting factor of resistance of the worker. In that case, the "logical" move would be for capitals to band together, agree to invest and produce at certain levels, normalize profit rates, make concessions, and achieve social peace. But that does not happen, because there is compulsion to invest, to expand, to win market share... on pain of ruin.” http://revcom.us/a/322/on-the-driving-force-of-anarchy-and-the-dynamics-of-change-en.html. This gives light to one of my points. In order to really balance out the economic crisis that happens between classes (or even how basic rights are taken away through the anarchic interplay of these dynamics), it would have to take more than re-enforcing moral ideas and better social relations.

The production relations, which gives rise to this in the first place, must be examined. But it has to be studied with the consciousness of how this production relations is actually very rooted in the complex dynamics of capitalism-imperialism. In other words, it would have to take something much bigger than simply asking industrialists, capitalists and politicians to change. Because the problem is not that they lack morality (though some have turned completely corrupt), the problem is that they are forced into the dynamic interplay of imperialism.



The important thing to point out here is that it might not be as simple as discovering the golden egg that allows capitalist and industrialist to stop participating in the dynamics of imperialism. This is one of the reasons people think of reforms, aside from the fact that they miss out on how all the issues are interconnected with one another based on how the system is organized. However, even if you see this big complicated dynamics of interconnections, it is easy to then fall into thinking that a communist revolution is the answer because it’s an entirely different system. However, without seeing how this interconnection ties to how other imperialist structures function, communist vanguard fail to see how communism also falls short of solutions, even if it succeeds for a period of time. That is why another way out is needed during these times.

People's Congress of Resistance is a movement that might be looking at the larger lense of the problem but is geared more towards reform. It is looking for a NEW congress, while this movement does not believe in political economy. Now people can look into this and debate on why their movement is an actual agent of change, but we still need to see the possibility of reforms not working in actually answering ALL of the problems in society, which this system gave rise to and continued to make worse because of how it is organized.

When looking at solutions in the immediate sense, it might appear that this statement is trying to divide people (by stating that certain organizations don't have the answer). That is why is important not to view problems and solutions in the immediate sense but in the realities of past, present and future and how the masses should proceed according to this reality. Therefore it's not about uprooting some activist who were in other organizations into our own, as much as it is about what the masses should be doing for genuine liberation. This movement will also be learning much more as it proceeds.

Example to why people still rely on reforms

The cotton gin is an example of how technology was used to work on cotton and how it slowly led to the abolishment of slavery, when the means of slavery was working on the cotton fields. But now, slavery has socially evolved to means of incarceration where prisoners work on products in prisons- not to mention some prisoner still pick cotton. This is an interesting analogy to how the problem didn't really go away. Nonetheless, just how capitalists continue thinking of ways to make profit, reformers think of new ways to reform.

Now cotton in and of itself is not be the problem, but issues of manual labor, which rests on exploitation. Therefore, what needs to be analyzed is the social factors that give rise to injustice & exploitative means of labor, and how it also gives rise to globalization & institutions that puts a demand to more exploitative means, all centered in profits. In other words, capitalism needs to be identified much more specifically in order to see where the problem lies before envisioning how society can radically be reorganized without these forms of exploitation.

Robert Costanza is interviewed briefly on the topic of ecological economics, which strives to implement economic factors that serves the well-being of people and the environment, but is often hard to implement because of Capitalism's driving force. Costanza is one of the founders of a trans-disciplinary effort to understand how economics is embedded on the broader ecosystem that supports all human activity.

Costanza states, “Ecological economics recognizes that the economy, like any other subsystem on the planet, cannot grow forever. And if you think of an organism as an analogy, organisms grow for a period and then they stop growing. They can still continue to improve and develop, but without physically growing, because if organisms did that you’d end up with nine-billion-ton hamsters.” (https://insights.som.yale.edu/insights/what-is-ecological-economics). This is a great analogy of globalization: how capitalism has expanded through institutions and political branches.

By creating more institutions and political branches, there became a higher demand to maintain it; war being the source that fuels this type of economy even if it hurts the ordinary masses in different levels according to their location and other social factors. Of course, taking these issues seriously by implementing proper solutions would mainly mean that whatever factors play a role in expanding the economy would need to be resisted through the current policies in place related to foreign policy. Nonetheless, the limitations of reform need to be considered as well.

The main challenge is cooperation without inflicting economic and environmental harm, especially to the people who are directly experiencing the consequences of it.

Despite the psychological believe among main players that they can continue what they are doing through different “parachutes”, what needs to be analyzed is a different way of doing business because of the limitations brought forth through the depletion of resources, which will especially hurt an economy that is based on filling an economic gap while competing or exploiting others to do it, rather than focusing on the actual intellectual and manual roles needed, and spreading those options, in order to gain fruitful economy. If not, economic collapse is inevitable unless the necessary changes are implemented soon before it’s too late to see real results. And if economic collapse is inevitable, the masses would need to be prepared for that as well.

This preparation would require a strategy that would lead those who want to see a radically different vision of how society should be re-organized. This vision, therefore, would require the masses to make important societal decisions that would make the vision a reality. That does not constitute the traditional ways people do this by running for office. It means a strategy similar to past revolutions.

What is Revolution?

Some people think of revolution as protest (which is actually a demand for reform, if taken other necessary steps outside of protest) or they picture themselves running out the government, but then don’t understand the challenges of

actually doing that what happens after successfully doing that (if not drowned in blood, which is why is important to understand when is the right time to do it).

Now, this brings forth the reason most people don’t want a revolution. Is not just that some people are living it good in the democratic world (which is part of the reality). But For those who do want change, not just for their own interest, but for the state of the world, don’t want the destruction that it brings forth without it genuinely bringing forth what they were fighting for in the first place, as learned in some historical revolutions. There must be a revolution that will be successful in the long run.

Strategy​ ​for Revolution

When the time for a revolution comes, many people will either leave or wait until things calm down in order to re-settle. This cannot be prohibited, for people can choose what they wish. However, the repercussions of both of these options taking place in a unanimous state of being can mean the invention or re-invention of systems that are only going to continue failing people and the planet: A planet doomed only to be occupied in chunks of land, while others don’t have simple shelter or are packed like sardines in a can. Therefore, it is important for there to be a force out there that is prepared to reorganize society the way it should be.

Society should be organized by experts in different fields who understand many of the ways society should be organized, but could never be organized under capitalism (even if it means they are hired by those who take the seat of reorganizing society in such a way depending on the roles being taken). But before proceeding to the reorganization of such a vision, there must be a force willing to fight off other forces who want to organize society according to their own interest rather than the well being of humanity and the planet. That means coming up with an appropriate military strategy, both learned from similar ones to possibly coming up with a unique strategy for this movement.

For example, The RCP looks to blend in like one of the ordinary people in the crowd to decrease their chances of defeat, while the 'club' stages something similar to a guerilla movement in the sense of moving around. I remember thinking that armors would serve for protection, but also thought of how it could wear down the fighters. Nonetheless, what matters is having the right strategy, and being focused on taking the seat of those in current power.

Although there is no military in the reorganization of this vision of society (at least not in the way that it is organized today- more on this on the International section of re-organizing society), with the exception of defense, the reality of a collapse means there has to be a revolutionary strategy that will prevent old rulers from ruling again. What has to be formulated is a strategy that will allow people to take the seats of those who organized the former society, without allowing the former state, or other forces, to retake power (is it possible to do this without violence? let's keep thinking/researching and communicating on this but it has to be based on reality rather than fear). Something to keep in mind is the strategy of other forces. However, what matters is that we have the right strategy.

But two things would need to be strongly considered:

The length of how long this will take, which can last not only taking power but also consolidating it, which were mistakes that were learned and applied during past revolutions (something that Trump has not yet done for those who start this movement in the U.S against fascism & Capitalism).

That said, understanding the real problem should allow people to act with morality towards people in general. On one hand, it’s understandable why victims would be angry towards groups of people who represent problems of the system. But in order to get rid of all types of oppression, equality (and even getting beyond equality, which is the point of how society should be reorganized) does not mean being vengeful, or else it will continue the cycle of oppression (a minority being used for profit).

This has been true so far of Communist getting rid of the oppression of the proletariat, for example, but then exploiting others, even if they accomplished beautiful things in the beginning. And this form of exploitation even happened to people who actually wanted a communist revolution but were disillusioned in severe ways due to the nature of political challenges, as well as fighting among themselves. And these political challenges brings forth people who want change but become the enemies they’re fighting- aside from the disasters brought forth from the enemy itself.

Another important point about the possibilities of comrades fighting each other is the reason why the early stages of the strategy, which is accumulating mass support, means the importance of genuinely caring for humanity, including supporters and those who take up on important roles. This allows for the process of resolving conflict to be possible. On the other hand, if you have people who are in it just for personal gain, they won't care about their relations but how much they are liked and how much they can succeed in a mechanical way. This will only create antagonism and hurt the cause.

This brings in the importance of having a fresh look at strategies for revolution that is very different from what we hear about from, "The Art of War," and other sources. This is not to say that there is no value in these resources. There might be value in even reading about past political crashes between capitalism and communism, for example, even if this is not about political economy. This is so that we can have a better understanding of what is the current reality before we can transform it.

The point is that strategies for revolution are usually about either defeating the enemy or manipulating their peers so that they can have better control of them. Now, of course, we do need to know how to defeat the enemy, but we also need to cooperate with our peers rather than try to manipulate and have control of the group.

The principles below are not created in the attempt to set out a list of dogmatic rules but to understand social issues in a deeper foundation, in order to visualize what is meant by morality and epistemology.

Principles

1. Being sympathetic to the state of Palestine does not mean being anti-semitic or being islamic fundamentalist supporters (this goes for other issues of the world). Oppression toward a group of people requires brainwashing another group who will support this oppression. Therefore it is not as simple as taking it out on the people who are trained to think a certain way, rather those who rule over them (though even the concept of rulers is a tricky subject because of the psychology overall here, especially if the rulers were ordinary citizens themselves who were so brainwashed to go along with hateful ideologies that they worked towards a career that will allow them to implement it).

There is a tendency for people to become anti-semitic when being angry toward the state of Palestine, or not supporting the state of palestine because they are still empathetic toward the history of the holocaust. History and current social issues is confusing because emotions from severe trauma can really cloud the judgement of what is taking place.

The point is that no one should be oppressed, and what should be focused on is what gives rise to this social antagonism, and how we can transform it for the well being of all. But it is easier said than done: with that comes a lot of complexities and the necessity for groups of people willing to do the work on understanding reality and reorganizing society how it should be organized, along with the issues of social antagonism and the transition process.

This is something that will be a constant struggle in the reorganizing of society because extremists are either armed or use methods to antagonize people based on their own bias belief rather than based on reality. Most of them are already part of organizing society: either holding political office, in the media or police ranks, some being former KKK members (for those in the U.S). This is even why Donald Trump was able to hold presidency through an electoral college that has a history of making sure slavery was held in the U.S constitution as long as it did (though there is new information surfacing every day).

All these are real challenges to consider. This is why many people are so patriotic of the American flag, and are proud to pledge allegiance and sing the national anthem. These are cultural ways to keep this system as morally corrupt as it has for decades, even if people don’t realize it, or even if they do and are proud of it. These are things to understand when confronting people: A repeated question will be, “who can actually be won to this movement?” but in order to answer that, there must be an understanding of what people really think and why.

2. Being against patriarchy does not mean hating men. It is a psychology of degradation. Women have been, and still are, a big subject and target of this degradation in times of wars and other disasters. But overall, it is simply a form of degradation that is inflicted on any group of people.

3. Breaking the chains of one class, does not mean taking vengeance on another class (this has a slight connection to some of the things mentioned on principle #1 when it comes to rulers). In basic summary, the reason this is complicated is because the reality is that there are rulers who want to exploit, and there must be ways of dealing with this if people want real change. But those rulers might be much more complicated than simply labeling it as the 1% or those who work for the government. Leaving room for discussions like this is important because of the challenges, and therefore the importance, of understanding it to its full potential.

Once this happens, there can be a firm believe on the right method and approach to these challenges. In the meantime, there is no point in trying to dictate something that is not grounded in reality just so that the person saying it sounds confident and persuasive. This has happened in dictatorships of any systems where people are firm and repetitive in order to implement their methods, but when it comes to the implementation process, things go berserk and they wished they would have digged deeper before committing grievous mistakes.

4. Being against the oppression of black people does not mean being racist against white people. The same explanation of # 1. During ancient times, all tribes and races in all regions of the world had their own level of exploitation in order to survive. Europeans were simply the ones who traveled to continue their way of survival in other parts of the world because their economy was deteriorating. That is not to justify things, but to see the state of humanity beyond race. Another important note is that racism against blacks was simply a form of social antagonism created in order to justify slavery, but slavery back then, as of now (modern day slavery in the international level), included(s) other races as well. Nonetheless racism against immigrants and blacks is very alive and kicking, no matter how much we have "progressed" in some levels.

The reality is that there would be no United States without the slavery of black people. And now the New Jim Crow with the mass incarceration of black people is something that capitalists are making big bucks on. It is just one example of making money out of exploitation. People in general should not think is ok for this to take place. To say, “well, at least we have security,” Is supporting the exploitation of black people, which has a rich history that ties with the Prison Industrial Complex. Also, of course, there are other levels of exploitation such as quality healthcare, education, and other things that are crucial to survival but cannot be given unless you can afford it. This happens to poor whites as well who some (those who are either extremely conservative or fascists) will blame the black race and immigrants for, despite they are already going through deportations and killing by police. Again, this is why the masses need to understand the complexity of the issues that rise out of this system outside of blaming race.

5. We should strive for knowledge and expertise with the understanding that it is an ongoing process. Therefore, no one knows everything, but with a collective means of sharing what we do know, the necessary theory and practice for a better world becomes more possible. People should welcome research from others. This also ties to the topic of religion, which is a touchy subject because the emphasis of reality, hence the sciences of things, can easily be interpreted as science vs. religion. Therefore religious people might be concerned of having their religion suppressed.

The point of this principle is not to suppress religion, and even persuade religious people to give up their religion and convert to atheism (as some communist do). The point is to understand reality and the science of things, which determines reality.

6. There shouldn’t be identity politics, such as this person has more of a right to a voice than another. However, there is an importance of having victims speak out. It is equally important for people who are usually trained to blame the victims to actually be on their side instead, without feeling sorry for them or thinking they are less capable of thinking critically. At the same time we should fight for what is true, not based on who said what. Therefore there should be an active sense of listening, investigating on what people say, and then debating on the accuracy of it.

It is highly important to bring masses to this movement and understand how to win. That is why it would be preferable not to go to political authorities or state police regarding this information. The only exception is if they are genuine supporters, especially based on their history. If not, then they will only be part of this movement in order to reorganize society the way it is already organized, which defeats the purpose of fighting to bring this into being.

To a certain extent, some people within the industrial and political branches might want to cease participating. However, they will not just drop everything they have worked for, for something that is very uncertain. They are going to continue participating in these dynamics as long as it pays the bills. Even re-envisioning a society completely different from today is hard for some people to do, except for those who really do see the need for a completely different way of connecting with people and the environment. And in envisioning this world, it may become possible if there is organization surrounding this idea.

When it comes to struggling with the masses: neighbors, peers, family, etc., it is important to go over what different sources say about different issues so that reality can be determined. And there are different levels to things: not just the issues in the surface, but how these issues rose. Another key component is keeping in mind all the players making decisions regarding this issue and how it is connects to the current constitution and how it is currently organized. In that respect, people will see things in a different light. Therefore it is not so much about competing with those who have different ideologies, and turning your back on them: It is about what is real and what is not, and what to do about it.

Re-organizing Society without Exploitation

Introduction:​ ​ Ecological & Environmental Economics

A constitution in the attempt to reorganize society only works if it’s grounded in a system that is permanent despite its lively and dynamic essence in and of itself (not just biologically but ecologically), which continues to change and flourish. Without seeing how the system that organizes it actually affect it, that society will continue to be defeated in the realm of the social and natural sciences that governs our survival. That said, different societies might be organized differently according to this ecological reality and cultures, as long as the culture is not one of exploitation.

Viewing it this way, you can see that the problem and solution in and of itself is not necessarily the constitution, or else we can just reform it now. The problem is the WHOLE dynamics of how it is organized according to political ideology, which readers will understand as they keep on reading.

Introduction: No Political Systems

No longer will we have the extreme society of capitalism, where people profit out of ruins in many different ways and deep levels. People can see this through the current constitution, that despite some decent laws and rights, which people had to go through a great deal of sacrifice and struggle to even implement, it is a constitution that is mostly for the ruling class, not society in its entirety- some even creating loopholes or not following the constitution. Capitalists in a small scale easily lose in the chess game of imperialism, even if they continue creating new parachutes and safety nets that allows them to expand further at the expense of the planet.

No longer will we also have an extreme society of communism, where people will be denied individual rights for a state that will always be in deep crisis due to the challenges of going “all the way toward communism” (which means waging revolutions internationally in order to liberate the masses in a world scale) while being on the socialist road, only to be defeated by imperialism in the long run because of the challenges of a political economy. Maintaining any political economy, by whatever name, keeps intact the expansive nature of capitalism through its political branches and military, which makes the economy vulnerable.

The legislative and executive branch is not present in this constitution: Bringing this constitution into being is not to gain state power but to implement a system that is very different from the one we have now.

Although people who take part in working hard to bring this constitution into being can and should continue being part of re-organizing this new society, there should not be doing so for profit or power, but the wellbeing of others and the environment. Excluding these branches re-assures that we don’t go through another possibility of political corruption in all levels. Further explanation will be provided in the judicial branch section, which is kept for means of organizing society.

The only way people should make impactful decisions is through the normal institutions of society, and through the judicial branch. Instead of hearing about politicians who make promises of reforms, the appropriate staff pertaining to that field, or those in the judicial branch, will be more directly responsible for executing those decisions. This can take place through votes, which will be described in more detail.

Proof of breaking principles will be ground for dismissal. This will not have to be part of the media, and the whole process will be more intimately community oriented. Because it won’t be a society run by profit, they will not be able to get away with things in the judicial process (for possible actual crimes) just because they have money to do so.

Introduction: No Bureacracy

We should have a society that can truly flourish in many different ways: not restricted and divided by the intellectual sphere and labor; not being restraint from a number of requirements before getting their feet wet to what really exuberates them; and not pushed to understand important ideas solely to meet educational requirements, but instead see how their own lively critical way of thinking when pertaining to their work, can inspire them to look for answers that can really meet the needs that humanity faces in different realms. This is something that should be upheld, not in a utopian sense, but in a way that society can be in a state of wellbeing, or strive to be, and therefore be willing to meet challenges and overcome obstacles.

People who were once in these branches will simply be trained in the relevant fields that are needed- the closest thing will be the judicial branch, which will be kept for the sake of reorganizing society. The consequences of transitioning to this will be considered, as well as ways of dealing with these challenges, which is partly spoken to in the section of housing.

The process of getting jobs that were part of the government in the former society will no longer apply in the new society. That means no more bureaucracy: basing people as lotteries who are usually required to take several steps that demand payment and being on a waiting list.

There will still be requirements and the process of training and education in some fields, especially the ones that are more challenging. But in the basic fields, there should only be a short amount of time in training and then getting the job, rather than requiring certificates and other processes that takes longer and is more expensive.

That also means that it will be illegal to withhold checks in order for a big chunk to be taken away by taxes (there will be no taxes: that will eventually be explained), even if the staff is a freelancer, a substitute or any other relevant position. Plus there should be people who are paid only to do training in order to assure adequate training and confidence among new employees (at least for that period).

Introduction: A different way to look at Defense

There should be a defense section (to defend against extremists) but there should not be a military because of its consequences. One is regarding the economy, not just for the sake of the region or country but for the sake of armies themselves: their psyche and wellbeing. And for the sake of other countries who can experience the same abuses done by any form of military. Furthermore, while countries can get guidance from us in defending itself from imperialism, it does not entirely need our help if it wages revolution based on epistemology and morality, and reorganizing society according to their own unique region.

This is another reason a constitution should not see a need for military if it is in reality doing it for the sake of humanity. The emancipation of humanity should be supported, but should not be a means of feeling entitled to be the ones to free others who might have a better understanding than others when it pertains to their region. Others can contribute to how they can be liberated- if they want help- but not literally be part of waging their revolution. Individuals and groups who feel inclined to be part of it won’t be restricted- it just shouldn’t be an organ to the constitution.

Having a military is one of the ways to be in the pools of imperialism. It is not the only way, which is partly why the rest of this constitution is designed the way it is, but it is a major contribution because it is a way of increasing the economy in the imperialist point of view. In this constitution, it will not be about economic strength in a political economist point of view; it will be about the people in the region. But because not having a military will prevent havoc in other countries in the long run, it is also considering humanity in other parts of the world.

A consequence to watch out for is the fact that other imperialists countries can strengthen their armies. This is something to consider. However, the constitution should be laid out in a way that allows these challenges to be met, starting with the ones already proposed here.

Introduction: Branches of Science

The sciences in all fields will be respected, but societal problems should come first. Once there is work on most of the issues: economic, social relations and the ideas bound up with it, then other branches of science can be included in funds and other inquiries. In the meantime, scientist in these fields- not pertaining directly to society- can still do their ongoing research without fear of it being taken away or disregarded. They can also use their ideas in other countries who might have the space and money for them to do so.

Because production relations will not be owned by an expansive political branch and a ruling class, it will be distributed (improving the economy) to society, and even internationally, on the necessary areas. The rest of the constitution lays out how this is so.

Things won’t be perfect or utopian. There will still be challenges such as illnesses, social antagonism and other things. However, there will be a process of overcoming these problems, and there won’t be the severe problems that once existed when imperialism was an integral part of society under capitalism. It doesn’t stand for the people who have to be constantly sacrificed for the liberation of humanity under the red flag for example.

It doesn’t have stripes, stars, and other types of shapes and colors that not only alienates them from the rest of the world, but is a symbol of control, manipulation and degradation for the interest of a ruling class. No longer will people be ruled in the conventional ways we see today through different political systems.

There will be organization, but not manipulation for people’s interest. Instead there will be a collective activity where people genuinely care for the needs of others, while at the same time, respect people’s individuality. Everyone will be doing what they can according to their needs but also according to what they understand and their conditions. Therefore there will be a constant process that should be respected, while at the same time, not underestimating how much creativity can be unleashed by people.

There should not be an underestimating that others don’t hold the same potential, which can actually be unleashed much faster; that they are simply pulled in different directions and have limitations set forth under their government, in which they live under. Plus a lot can be learned from others in different sections of society. It is not our responsibility to liberate others, but we can take part in different levels if we are inclined to do so. Citizens in different societies should take pride in seeing the liberation of others.

Introduction: Non-exploitive People

This means no discrimination on basic things based on color of skin, gender, sexual orientation, religion, political ideology (for those who actually still prefer a political system) and social status. The challenge is dealing with individuals with a high sense of social antagonism and ideologies that enforce this. This is something to be dealt with in a civil way. Anything that resorts to implementing actual and physical threats will be dealt under the section of defense.

This also means there will no longer be homelessness, starvation, not affording proper healthcare, education and other basic necessities by the people, even the marginal: people coming out of prison, addiction, the mentally ill, orphans, victims of abuse, kidnap and human trafficking. Therefore the marginal will be included in society, and in doing so, society will be waging a struggle for the improvement of social relations through a number of institutions that should follow the guidelines to this constitution.

Societies implementing this constitution or something similar to this, will not be waging war, poking at natural resources that have repercussions to the environment, setting up shop in the international level if it is based on exploitation; there won’t be any borders, deportations, and mass incarceration, police killings, denying women abortion rights, and allowing human trafficking to go unpunished. There will be less prisons.

The reason there were so many prisons in the old society is because of the profit that was made. That means many people being locked up who are not suppose to be: drug users, mental patients, etc. The real crimes, on the other hand, went unpunished if they had enough money to get away with the crime. This reality will be reversed once this new constitution has been put into place. That means many people will be released from prison, but transitioned to the services they need while being under housing (some of this explained on the housing section). Before making this transition, their individual case will be strongly considered..

One of the means of improving social relations is that the marginal will be getting better quality service and getting what they need out of society. People who take part in providing these services will not only be better equipped to dealing with the challenges, but also be honored much more, and given their own service in coping with the challenges such as therapy or leisure activities that decreases stress. Any person in higher positions should take notice of that and foster this type of environment.

All these relations will be examined through branches of sciences that make the organization of society possible. A relevant visual source is the permaculture tree,​ ​which can be part of sustainable urban planning that actually includes everyone in the process.

Introduction: Environment

People will see, in some sections of the constitution, how garbage will be decreased. Any garbage that remains will be use for energy. When society has gone through a process where garbage is not enough to rely on energy due to the limited remainings of it, other options will be used that are sustainable unless there must be more research done in the area regarding the best practice. These decisions will be left to the experts for the wellbeing of the people and planet, not for profit.

Oil will be a thing of the past and the resource that will substitute it is something experts in this field will decipher. That means rivers will also be freer of pollution because institutions will no longer get away with spilling hazardous products. The only thing missing would be for citizens to take care of it themselves. That means there will be a process where rivers in cities will eventually be safer to swim in and be used as an extracurricular activity. That also means water that is safe to drink.

Introduction: Understanding and Using the Constitution

This will be included in the constitution so that people can understand how society is organized in a clearer way, and really be part of this lively process. That also means that if anyone they work with is breaking a constitutional right, they can change the circumstances of this through this constitution as their backup.

This doesn’t have to resort to taking away someone’s job (unless there are necessary reasons for termination based on the laws and principles), but it does mean allowing people to get the proper service they need, even if it means staff must be re-trained (and this should be brought up with respect and staff should not take it personal).

That is why it will be important for people to go over this constitution, see how it functions different from other systems, and also see where it is lacking in things that can be more innovative to the needs of society, as long as it doesn’t contribute to exploitation in any way. Part of this process is understanding challenges and solutions to these challenges.

Introduction: salaries

Salaries will depend both on what people need: material necessity, such as challenges of health, environment, etc.- a great way to contest with ideas and find ways to bring it among the youth in education or the workforce, since ideas will be to benefit the whole of society rather than personal gain- and what is most popular, such as entertainment and the arts.

This also means allowing opportunities for people in the lower sections of society to be included in the arts rather than cast out the way they are now.

Any necessary materials will rise out of necessity, which will be a result of these wrangling of ideas, and contribute to the economy- which will include everyone who wants to be part of any processes.

There will be no unions because society will already be organized in a way that unions will no longer be necessary. People should have choices to the fields they would like to participate in, and choose according to their genuine desires- rather than have some groups not even be given these choices unless they come from an upper class, as is done in the current society. Lastly and most importantly, the economy will be distributed to ideas that really do accomplish what is set out in the constitution.

Introduction: Debt/Loans & Currency

One of the results to transitioning to the new society is that debt will be taken away. Plus there will no longer be credit cards, loans, or other means to indebt people (and there should be a less demand to want these, since things will be more affordable). Marriage will no longer be a means of collecting debt from one partner to the next (it will solely be for love purposes).

The currency will depict a nature scene including different elements.

Introduction: Public & Private Property

One of the challenges that might cause social antagonism is the expropriation of private property turned for public needs, if necessary. This might not be necessary if the reduction of political organization makes the economy stronger, as well as how different society will be organized overall. However, that is not too sure until there is either a clearer analysis or until the time comes to reorganize it as such, which allows a better view on what there is space and money for.

Another challenge is also taking away things that are way too many of, but unnecessary. The reason for this is because people would be use to endless options of materials and private property. Spaces should be prioritized by needs first, not by profit.

Introduction: Global Institutions

Some global institutions do magnificent work, but there are others who do harm due to the challenges of working with imperialist countries (IMF, UN). Therefore decisions, policies and other factors that cause harm need to analyzed and resisted. There will also be no association with other imperialist countries regarding big industries and political processes. The only exception will be what is provided under the international section, which is mainly to serve those who are governed unfairly.

Introduction: Holidays

Holidays will still be implemented, except the ones that are based on exploitation. Another way to remember could be in respect to the victim’s point of view, rather than the ones who exploited. But of course, people will not be prohibited from celebrating the way they wish to.

Institutions

​How institutions should run- and what institutions- should be evaluated based on the necessity of society. The abolition of some institutions will depend on its purpose: It cannot be purely for profit, without serving the needs of the people and the environment.

Institutions that are only harmful to people and the environment should cease to exist, unless it is only harmful based on how it is run. As mentioned in the introduction, institutions that will no longer be necessary in the new society will be the legislative and executive branch because of the decisions they are forced to implement. Anything that is important to continue implementing can be transitioned to the judicial branch.

Education: Curriculum

There will be both an integration of theory and practice in the field of education. For example, the curriculum will include why the subjects they are learning are important in their society (especially this new society and its challenges, history and complexities), and how it integrates in different fields of study and careers. Students will get a chance to experience, experiment and understand how it is used to accomplish certain things- and most importantly, why these accomplishments are necessary, and what it has accomplished thus far through history, biography, the arts, and any relevant areas when pertaining to the fields of science.

Education: Recreational Activities

Time for recreational activity will be part of the curriculum. This should not only include outdoor play and sports: It should include the option of a nature activity (such as canoeing, rock-climbing and other water or nature activities- following proper safety regulations), immersing in the arts, and educational trips that are relevant to the curriculum (institutions that include these recreational activities can merge with schools- not in a financial sense, rather in working with one another).

No one should be excluded from these rich experiences. Students with special needs might need to be monitored differently, but those services should be provided and communicated without having to exclude the student for any of these reasons.

Competition can be allowed in the harmless ways of bonding, but not to humiliate, see or treat as someone as inferior for not perfecting the sport.

Education: Inclusion of all students

This process of education will be given to everyone regardless of social status. Public education will no longer be something that is needed because of how different society is organized. By stating this, it is not to imply that charter schools are needed more than public education, the way the current society speaks of: It is only an issue because the decision is on the basis of profit.

This new society should no longer make decisions on the basis of profit but the well being of the people. Therefore, there will not be a need to make education a commodity (which was easier to do with political branches. Instead of politicians profiting, only respectable employees will be earning a decent salary and be allowed and trained to work with efficiency).

Education: Approach to Teaching

The challenges is that students will still be more capable of things than others. This is partly because of how society is currently organized. If we improve the way we teach the youth, the learning gap will shrink. In the meantime, however, to meet the realities of the situation, people will be taught and trained according to their abilities. There will be schools of different expertise (mostly from fields most needed in this envisioned society, which will mostly be institutions described here) rather than different types of intelligence.

Different levels of learning will be met if students learn best through different avenues, especially the mentally and physically handicapped. It is important to understand that just because they have a different level of learning does not mean they can be treated with disrespect and neglect, especially if they could achieve more with the proper education and training.

Education: Healthcare

Furthermore, students will be properly diagnosed with any illness they may have, that without the adequate healthcare provided in the current society, would not know about. This will be done so that they can function mentally and physically, not so that pharmaceuticals could benefit. And treatments will be a natural process. Students should have an understanding of their own bodies, psyche, etc., through individual evaluations, especially through the subjects they are learning.

This will help them understand the subjects they are learning much deeper, as well as help them understand themselves. By understanding themselves more, they can take care of themselves properly enough to be part of building the society they live in to the best of their abilities.

Education: Merging with other institutions

Many educational institutions can merge with other institutions that allow students to shadow what employees do. Furthermore, when students realize they have a passion for an expertise, they should transfer to a specialized school (unless they only view it as a hobby)- something that will be recognized by their school therapists (more on this topic toward the end of this section). That means age will no longer be a discriminatory factor in allowing students to be included in society.

Child labor will not be an issue because institutions should be respectful to all employees regardless of identity factors. That means decent salary, schedule and benefits. At the same time, the youth should not be forced to making this decision. They should be inspired to do so and it should come from their genuine interest.

Education: Therapy

Therapy will be mandatory for children in schools in order to prevent unnoticed abuse and neglect that can be a result of the youth not having motivation, inspiration, and other important social behaviors, in order to feel they are included in society, and therefore benefit emotionally, mentally, physically, etc.

Therapy will no longer be a luxury based on who can afford it and solely based on evidence of severe trauma. Rather, therapy will simply be responsible for noticing possible obstacles and challenges that the youth is facing; and help them either overcome, solve or remove from their lives, depending on the people and situation.

The time it takes to do that depends on the youth. The point is that it will be a process that therapists need to respect unless it is a life threatening situation that demands immediate attention- something that the Therapist will be responsible in bringing up to the principal. Furthermore, problems evaluated should not be assumed.

Therapists should have an actual understanding of what the real problems are. Ways of knowing how to detect that should be given to school therapists in specialized schools.

Students do not have to continue taking therapy if it is no longer needed, which therapists have a responsibility in determining. The exception is if the student wants to continue therapy sessions, on the grounds that he or she personally needs it. The proper education, recreational activities and healthcare can be a means of decreasing the need for therapy. However, students who need it or want it should have the option.

Education: Staff

Principals should have an understanding of what school therapists, teachers and other relevant staff are capable of doing outside of just being certified with schooling and experience. Employees in schools and other types of institutions will have a chance to understand what is demanded of them if they really want the profession and were not taught during former training. It all depends on the training they got and their individual psyche and other factors (they should have the option of taking therapy and other services if necessary). Again, a proper staff evaluation should be given.

In matters of re-taking training, staff do not have to necessarily start all over again- they just simply must understand what a good employee is and strengthen any weaknesses they might have that fails in meeting those requirements through the necessary training. Problems with family should be dealt with, and there should be a process of dealing with them, such as meetings where parents can learn more about their children, as well as parenting techniques and other relevant information.

There might be less of a need for paraprofessionals in the field of education with the exception of handicapped or other services needed by students.

Emotional cases (which is linked to behavioral problems) will be handled by therapists and staff that focus on recreational activities or other necessary activities or remedies- not paraprofessionals; tutoring will be handled by tutoring services rather than paraprofessionals; and students with allergies can be monitored in the cafeteria. The same goes for certain mental conditions that can be dealt by a School Psychiatrist rather than a Paraprofessional, with the exception of needed monitoring, in which- in that case- Paraprofessionals will be seriously trained to handle.

Education: Costs

Because the economy will be distributed, education will not be expensive. Therefore school loans will not be necessary. Students traveling abroad will have to read the international section of this constitution. Another consideration is the way that schools in the old society already had textbooks that met government guidelines. This will no longer be necessary. The teacher will have a choice of either going by their guidelines or the schools’, depending on their experience, knowledge and confidence. Principals will obtain these guidelines (with the help of the judicial branch if necessary).

Education: Materials

One of the differences between the educational guidelines from this constitution to the former society is that it should strive for facts based on critical thinking rather than training students from an early age to have a certain belief or attitude that was only put in place for the interest of the ruling class. An example of how different classes should be from the current society is that Literature classes should be as fun as a “book clubs”. Novels should be picked according to our times (with some exceptions) and according to students’ struggles that resemble a lot of different characters throughout literature.

This gives a chance, not only for students to connect with the characters more deeply, but be inspired to write a review that is equivalent to writing a theme paper. This is a good way to connect with other subjects as well if the literature is based on history, psychology and other sciences, or it can be done the other way around where a teacher from other subjects recommend certain literature that dives into what she or he is teaching in class.

Evolution and other necessary scientific discoveries have to be taught in schools. There should be no tolerance to denying evolution and other scientific discoveries. Students should base things on reality through careful study and investigation rather than the manipulation of facts. The youth have to think critically, set themselves free from the chains of the current society and be part of the lively process of a society that basis themselves on reality and freedom (freedom defined as a sense of wellbeing: freedom of choice and expression that includes others in the process rather than freedom to profit out of exploitation).

Being anti-abortion is supporting the enslavement of women. This topic relates to the science- both in reality and biology- and should be included in education. There should be attention to females who at an early age show signs of carelessness and being vulnerable to being in abusive relationships, not because females are innately or naturally prone to abuse, but due to the social conditions that puts them in those conditions, and therefore increases their chances of unwanted pregnancies.

That is part of the therapy process. However, a female should have a say on what she wants to do with her body. For those who are concerned about abortion being an act of murder to a fetus, have to understand that a woman, who is already a full human being, must be considered first.

This is an example of social antagonism that needs to be transformed for the liberation of women. Women can contribute to society without only being seen as bearer of children. Furthermore, the oppression of people in general: black people, immigrants and others, should really be digged into so that people can understand it on a deeper foundation. That means not providing students with a textbook that simply sums up what this history of oppression means. This is a great source of decreasing social antagonism and being truly educated on the realities of history and other appropriate fields of study.

Students should also get “real-life” elective courses throughout their adolescent years, such as getting their licence, cooking and other basic necessities they might need, in order to navigate society and be able to function in it. This should be included in urban areas as much as in suburban and rural ones.

There will also be a school guideline for students in understanding how to navigate the new society, based on how some of the institutions described here function differently from the former society, especially when pertaining to the environment.

Healthcare

General doctors will be responsible in giving an honest and all-round feedback to their patients. Physicians will be trained if they don’t know how to evaluate an individual as thoroughly, though the main problem seems to be that “time is money” in the current society rather than the thorough care of the patient.

Healthcare will focus more on serious and terminal illnesses, such as necessary surgeries or other important and necessary procedures. This will be especially the case with different fields of expertise as needed by the people in society.

Institutions or individuals who sell holistic natural remedies will be welcomed in society, and can integrate what they know into the healthcare system. Because this is a society of well-being, no one should own the means of important knowledge for their own personal profit. However, they will be compensated for this. Furthermore, schools of medical expertise will include this in their studies: holistic natural remedies.

Anything that is commonly needed should be grown in society. Furthermore, anything that can cause certain illnesses, such as food and toxic products- should be prohibited. If it only affects some people, it will not be prohibited overall; individuals who are susceptible, however, should have an understanding of this.

There will only be one type of healthcare. Because everyone will obtain proper care, there won’t be different healthcare plans competing with one another based on price and quality care. Healthcare will be affordable and of high quality.

Abortion will be legal due to the explanation provided toward the end of the education section. Education will provide methods of contraception, especially the natural methods that decreases the side effects for women. Education will also be provided on a woman’s biological clock before females hit puberty, in order to understand the changes that occur in her body- this is an example of where students should have individual evaluations. This will not just be a run through. Females should prove they have an understanding. This information is also relevant to the education section.

For women who choose to have babies at an early age (since they have the right to choose), will be provided with services for the children and the youth while mothers are studying and working. This will be provided by the judicial branch.

Environment

​Any nonprofit institution in the current society that conserve parks, waterways and other relevant fields should be a regular institution (what in the current society is described as part of the government). This means that employees will be paid more fairly because of the necessity to conserve the environment rather than rely on donations.

This also means public institutions, such as public parks (as described in public education above) will merge to these important institutions. Therefore employees of the public parks will also be part of working toward conservation rather than just cleaning up parks.

This also means that they will be demanded the same respect as those who use to work in nonprofits. Inexperienced staff will not only get training, but can be allowed to learn from educational institutions that teach about the fields they work in, especially those who they merge with.

Experts in the field of sustainable urban planning will make decisions on transportation, such as how people can transport differently from how they use to. Can we decrease roads in the city? That will depend on people’s jobs, which might be different from how the current society is, depending on what they use to work in. That also takes into account how much closer people should be commuting to work rather than taking long commutes to work. This is also considering less accidents, a friendlier and safer environment for children, and the fact that this society will no longer rely heavily on oil.

That either means a change in transportation and/or change the way transportation is set up. People only feel they need cars based on how the current society is designed. If society is designed differently, necessities will also change. Consideration will be given to travelers or nomadic community members who need their own transportation for moving around.

Produce

​Most produce should be sold from local markets and farms. The farms will be in areas where old institutions -that are no longer needed -use to occupy. That means composting will be a mandatory need for most of the farms. That also means reusing most of the bottled products between employee and employer rather than the current popular method of recycling.

That also means that the new society will be in higher demand for people to know how to make many things that in the current society we simply just bought from other countries. Textiles will also be a mandatory recycling method. Information on products and technology will be provided on the products and technology section. Overall, this means there will be much less garbage. Most of the places that garbage use to occupy can be a good idea for future farms.

There will be exceptions on imports that are products or produce that cannot be grown in seasonal weather, or any other reason. There will be few exceptions in order to strive to be as independent as possible. Technology and other ways of doing business should make this feasible, and the challenges of this should be worked on to resolve the issues of doing so, including how to transition to make this more likely.

Many products and produce left over from the transition process can be re-used if safe to use or consume. There should be ways to make the transition faster (in order to prevent famine) such as ways to make soil fertile for growing after being in concrete for so many years or decades.

There will be way more inclusion of the vegan diet for those who are vegan. That means more markets and restaurants who tailor to vegans. There will be natural preservation of food for times that food need to be preserved. That means no more NGO’s or other methods that can lead to certain illnesses. There will also be room for luxuries like coffee, wine, alcohol & marijuana (which should be legalized for the sake of the economy with proper restrictions), but available much more locally.

Exceptions to imports will be done in a way that workers overseas are treated fairly and/or own the means of production. Because we are in a world where imperialism is everywhere, it is recently hard to find those opportunities with its rare exceptions. However, helping countries achieve these goals should not only be on the basis of improving imports. It should genuinely be for their well being and liberation. More of this will be explained in the international section.

Animals

There will be no animal cruelty whatsoever. That means no dog mills or any other means of animal cruelty. Animal testing can be tested on lab rats instead of other animals. Anyone who tries to do a business out of this in secrecy will be arrested. However there will be methods to allow for animal consumption without any form of abuse beforehand. Animals will also be needed for certain produce and be treated fairly. Therefore, many of the produce will be imported from these areas (as locally as possible).

Housing

There will be housing for those who are transitioning out of jail, orphanages, recovering from drug addiction, human trafficking, transitioning to the workplace from homelessness, or in the process of treating a mental illness. The benefits of housing can be a great initiative for those who deny services because of the terms and conditions and poor quality service provided by the current society. Terms and conditions in this new society still applies, which is that housing will be given on the basis of wanting to receive services.

The services, however, will be respectable, tailored to their unique individual needs and natural processes of health care rather than using them as a means to profit in the pharmaceutical industry. The services will include education, health care, therapy, extracurricular activities, job training and placement, and any other relevant services. They will not all be mandatory depending on their needs.

There will be few areas where the marginal can reside in if they are still not interested in receiving the services they need. They can be taught how to live on their own through permaculture techniques (showering, storing food, etc.) for those interested in learning.

Because the economy will be distributed to society, housing will not be expensive. That means that obtaining a home loan, in most cases, will not be necessary. There will also be consideration for those who are transitioning from a specialized field that is no longer part of the new society, and therefore getting training to specialize on what is currently needed. They will also have free housing until they can do the full transition.

People who rather not go through this process and prefer to apply their skills to other countries are allowed to do so. Although the contradiction to this will be the suspicion of people in politics going to the side of an enemy, this will be analyzed in the defense and international section. Some of the jobs in the legislative and executive branches that are necessary in society will be transferred to the judicial branch, but there will still be a lot of positions from these branches that will no longer be necessary.

Textiles

The need for people to go into the textile industry will be very different from the current society. In the current society, most people are inspired to enter this field simply for fashion purposes. That reason can still apply, but because there will be a limit to imports, there will be a high demand for people who know how to make clothes. This will be one of the skills provided in education from an early age. Students can take a course either simply to learn a skill, for a hobby, or to get into the field of textiles.

Products

There will also be a need for people to learn how to make products and appliances for hygiene, kitchen or any other home purposes. Many of these can be sold in similar markets. People can take up the skills if they are interested (something that will be an option in education at an early age) and can use this as a means to spend less money. However, there will still be a need for people to get into the field for professional purposes, for it will be a high demand towards the beginning of the new society.

Many of the plastics used will continue to be re-used (with exceptions of damaged ones) in local markets. This will be done strictly from customer to employee with no middle man. This will mean less jobs in the sanitation department with few exceptions, but many of these jobs can simply be replaced with conservation or any other needed institution in society that people who were in the field are interested in transitioning to.

Technology

Technology will be needed. However, not in the way it is needed in the current society. For example, the current society had a means of making sure technical products such as cars, laptops and other relevant devices, get damaged much faster. This was a means to profit because then there was a constant need for more technology.

An excuse would be the “branding” of some technology, making some much more proficient than others based on its processing data. However, this again, was solely for profiting purposes.

In this new society, there will be none of this of any kind. If there is a way for technology to last longer, then we will apply that to every technology on the basis of functioning rather than basing it on brands and prices, and therefore more technology in this way.

This is especially important because we won’t be importing as much from other countries. Therefore we will need technology to last much longer. The only exception of “more” would be technologies that would improve the way the new society will be functioning and organized.

This means applying productivity to farms, and any other relevant and important ways of doing business, with the wellbeing of people and the environment in mind. This is also keeping in mind the social relations and the economy in this respect: not for the profit of a few over many, but for people’s needs. Many “old” and malfunctioning technologies will be refixed and used in the market rather than simply dumped in wastelands or exported overseas for others to pick up the mess for us, which is what currently takes place.

Cars will not need oil but transformed to either be battery based or other more sustainable methods of operating. The need for materials that make up technology will also not be met in the way that the old society did, which was a means of waging war. Therefore there has to be local means of obtaining products, produce and other necessities of society. The proper ways of doing so (leading to possible imports) will be examined in the international section when necessary.

Media

The media will not distort or lie for the profit of companies or individuals. Anything that is in the process of being proven must be stated. This can be the case when people in certain professions are going to work on solving a problem or overcoming a challenge. This will especially be important for tested ideas that will encourage production and economic relations. News internationally will also be to inform the realities or state what it appears until proven by journalists or others in the relevant field.

News can be neutral, but if it is waging a strong argument (which has the right to do so by the first law regarding freedom of speech) it must be based on evidence rather than just based on fear, hate or other reasons for assumption. This will especially be relevant when contesting with ideas that will encourage better social relations. And it can be connected with the needs of international jobs as stated in the international section, since the new society strives to use information as a means to be part of solutions in other countries rather than for entertaining purposes or for an excuse to wage war.

The challenge here is that this society will still have fascists and other hate groups that will still implement programs and news of social antagonism and would be allowed to do so through the first amendment. Although fascist arguments neglect certain groups that should be included, we also have to keep in mind that this inclusion should not be to use minorities or the marginal as a means to simply make a profit in other ways (something that was a contradiction during the civil rights laws and other relevant social movements- partly due to the politics behind it).

Other forms of media to be considered are magazines or other relevant sources. Most of the magazine brands can merge together unless they specialize in completely different topics. Most importantly, because we strive for the science (the reality of things) and critical thinking, writers must base their research on the same grounds: getting information from psychiatrists, for example, and other relevant professionals depending on the topic that they are writing about.

This means magazines should no longer target women to feel insecure in order to get them to buy products that are popular in the market. Again, there should be a strive for the wellbeing of people, and the accuracy of what benefits them. Therefore this type of information will not be tolerated.

The Arts

​The arts will be a great way to contest with ideas that improve social relations. A way is not only to include people who are usually left out of this enriching process due to the “who you know” and other challenges, but to especially include those with ideas that are not as popular (or doesn’t hold the spotlight at least) but would inspire a better atmosphere of social relations, and challenges being met in the current society that are important in overcoming or solving certain societal and scientific problems for the wellbeing of people and the planet. One of the major challenges is merging with opposing beliefs, attitudes, mentality and lifestyles. Institutions such as the Sundance Institute will be especially welcomed.

Judicial Branch

The legislativ