I've pretty much decided on my vote.

Neither Hillary Clinton nor Donald Trump. Now, don't get me wrong: There are some things that I like about each of their platforms, but each candidate is so personally deplorable to me that I just cannot bring myself to vote for either of them.

And I can't help but feel that each is in it to enrich themselves and their family and friends (cronies) when all is said and done.

I know, I know - same old, same old.

I had considered a vote for the Constitution Party's candidate Darrell Castle, but he's so far down in the polls it makes no difference. And, well, does he really want the job? I can't tell.

The Green Party's Jill Stein? No way.

So for president, I'll be voting for Gary Johnson, even though I fundamentally disagree with many (if not most) of his stances on social issues. And he's coming across as more of a loon-bat with each passing day (or maybe that's just what "the media" portrays him to be. I've never met the man, so I have to go by that.)

So why would I vote for Johnson?

Here's the deal: My vote can actually make a difference. Johnson is hovering right around 5 percent of the vote. Realistically, he has no chance of winning.

However, a candidate who can garner 5 percent of the national vote qualifies for federal matching funds. The effect of the matching funds is to strengthen the party - and third parties need all the help I can give - and if not in my dollars, then with my vote. A stronger third party may eventually break the duopoly we have in American politics (nationally, anyway).

So, even though Johnson won't win, a vote for Gary Johnson is not a wasted vote. It's not a vote for Hillary, nor is it a vote for The Donald. It's a vote to have more voices heard in the future of American politics.

And that's a good thing. And if not my voice, then perhaps the voices of my grandchildren.

Tom Hightower

Amarillo