Article content continued

“While both groups acknowledge the challenging aspects associated with the 4/20 celebration and protest, they also recognize that the event will occur regardless,” the report said. “Further, with the impending federal legalization of marijuana, there is recognition that in the foreseeable future, the 4/20 initiative will likely shift from being a protest to a legal celebration.”

Monday, the board will weigh the risks and benefits of permitting the 4/20 event.

The board is concerned a permit would set precedent and encourage other events involving smoking at parks and beaches. Allowing smoking conflicts with the board’s mandate of promoting health and allowing it by permit could harm the park board’s reputation because an illegal product would be sold and consumed at the event, according to the report.

But a permit would also reduce the liability to the park board and city by letting organizers to seek insurance. It would regulate vendors, help with cost recovery through permit fees — an estimated $155,000 for 2017 — and set clear processes and expectations that would help improve compliance and communications, the report said.

Dana Larsen, director of Sensible B.C. and an organizer with the Vancouver 4/20 Events Society, said acquiring a permit won’t change how the event is run and planned, which he said has always been in consultation with city and park board staff.

“Ultimately all a permit really means is that they’d be willing to accept our money to help cover some of the expenses from the event,” he said. “But I mean, for us, I’d much rather have a permit because I don’t see why we shouldn’t get one. If we were all drinking booze we’d be getting a permit … to me it just makes more sense. I’d rather be treated like any other event.”

neagland@postmedia.com

twitter.com/nickeagland