th, 2006 at 7:20pm:

George and Associates have helped supply numerous persons with the ability to produce resultes on a polygraph that violate basic values of most Americans, and no shame from either. Where is the surprise in that? So intenet on destroying the use of insturmentation to aid security of our country is of no concern, just winning a battle against use of polygraphics and "I win You Loose" is the goal. Congradulations on your accomplishment George and Associates.



Which basic values are on your mind? The ones that provide every American is entitled to be bamboozled, lied to and blindly led to believe mistruths and injustices? Sorry, those do not match my values. The instrumentation you speak of does little to provide security to our nation. In reality it is a detriment to rely upon polygraph evidence as a means of determining truth. Perhaps a crystal ball would be helpful for national security. At least it would be a bit easier to hurl toward the enemy than a computer program and blood pressure cuff. As to the argument you elude to: It's currently the best we have at our disposal. Well, if air travel was plagued with as many accidents as polygraph is with incorrect results would you feel the same? Another jet went down, but it's the best we got. Lie detection must be scientifically proven before it can receive due reliance. So far that is not the case. Maybe we should issue every soldier an M-1 Garand rather than modern weaponry. Those rifles worked well in WWII. Also, you may want to check your local library, university library or law library and see what information you can find about polygraphy. The information that polygraph testing is not reliable is not found only here.



Just think, according to what you have stated, you believe that for national security purposes, our nation should continue using testing which is easily foiled. That is according to your statement, not mine.

whylie wrote on Jan 17, 2006 at 7:20pm:Which basic values are on your mind? The ones that provide every American is entitled to be bamboozled, lied to and blindly led to believe mistruths and injustices? Sorry, those do not match my values. The instrumentation you speak of does little to provide security to our nation. In reality it is a detriment to rely upon polygraph evidence as a means of determining truth. Perhaps a crystal ball would be helpful for national security. At least it would be a bit easier to hurl toward the enemy than a computer program and blood pressure cuff. As to the argument you elude to: It's currently the best we have at our disposal. Well, if air travel was plagued with as many accidents as polygraph is with incorrect results would you feel the same? Another jet went down, but it's the best we got. Lie detection must be scientifically proven before it can receive due reliance. So far that is not the case. Maybe we should issue every soldier an M-1 Garand rather than modern weaponry. Those rifles worked well in WWII. Also, you may want to check your local library, university library or law library and see what information you can find about polygraphy. The information that polygraph testing is not reliable is not found only here.Just think, according to what you have stated, you believe that for national security purposes, our nation should continue using testing which is easily foiled. That is according to your statement, not mine.