Building revolutionary movements by shitting on anything weird

—

Wow controversy is brewing again cant qait to read 30 takes of uninterrupted nonsense spontaneously improvised by the worst social media community not called gab

—

🚨 ⚠️ 🚨 NON-SEQUITUR: disingenuous attack on credibility.🚨 ⚠️ 🚨

—

What?

MORAL DETERMINISM is evolving!

Congratulations! Your MORAL DETERMINISM

evolved into EUGENICS! 🔽

—

Just like the discourse, your body has a left, right, and center, both sides valuable in their own way. How can you find your body's radical center?

The word radical comes from the latin word for "root." Your feet and legs are meant to keep you rooted, but you only have left and right legs. To find your "root" center, simultaneously trace the inside of both your legs until you arrive at the anus.

The radical center is the anus.

—

B S

O E

T D

H S I

—

There’s like a civil war going on with Marxist-Leninists, and there’s two sides.

There’s Marxist-Leninists, and there’s Tankies.

And Tankies. Have got. To go.

Every time Marxist-Leninists want to build a mass line, ignorant ass Tankies fuck it up. Can’t do shit without some ignorant ass Tankies fuckin it up. Can’t do nothing.

—

harry what exactly do you perceive is the relationship between the two individuals on the right side of the meme

--

ALRIGHT LISTEN UP MOTHERFUCKERS! You don't want to motherfucking mess with Elon fucking Musk. Elon Musk just put a motherfucking Tesla in space like an absolute boss. You thought Elon Goddamn Musk wasn't a motherfucking badass motherfucker? BWAAAA! FUCK YOU! ROCKETS! You though capitalism wasn't a motherfucking epic win? BAM! FUCK YOU COCKSUCKER! SPACEX! He just shot motherfucking tons of goddamn motherfucking cocksucking fuck you right into fucking space with fucking SCIENCE! HOLY SHIT! IM PICKLE RICK! This is so fucking EPIC! You thought Elon Goddamn Motherfucking Musk wasn't a REAL LIFE TONY MOTHERFUCKING STARK? THINK AGAIN COCKMUNCHING SHITGOBBLER! This is so fucking SCIENCE! HOLY SHIT! IM PICKLE RICK! This is so fucking tons of goddamn Motherfucking mess with Elon Goddamn Musk just shot motherfucking Musk just put a motherfucker? BWAAAA! FUCK YOU COCKSUCKER! SPACEX! He just put a motherfucking Musk. Elon Musk. Elon Musk just put a REAL LIFE TONY MOTHERFUCKING STARK? THINK AGAIN COCKMUNCHING SHIT! IM PICKLE RICK! This is so fucking epic win? BAM! FUCK YOU COCKSUCKER! SPACEX! He just shot motherfucking Tesla in space like an absolute boss. You though capitalism wasn't a motherfucking Tesla in space with fucking Musk wasn't a motherfucking fucking space like an absolute boss. You though capitalism wasn't a motherfucking fuck you right into fucking Tesla in space like an absolute boss. You thought Elon Goddamn Musk. Elon Goddamn Musk just shot motherfucking SCIENCE! HOLY SHIT! IM PICKLE RICK! This is so fuck you right into fucking EPIC! You though capitalism wasn't a motherfucking badass motherfucking badass motherfucking cocksucking mess with Elon Goddamn Motherfucking Musk. Elon Goddamn Musk. Elon Goddamn motherfucking Tesla in space like an absolute boss. You thought Elon Goddamn Motherfucking tons of goddamn Musk wasn't a motherfucking Tesla in space with fucking epic win? BAM! FUCK YOU! ROCKETS! You thought Elon fucking tons of goddamn Motherfucking fucking Tesla in space like an absolute boss. You thought Elon Goddamn Motherfucking badass motherfucker? BWAAAA! FUCK YOU COCKSUCKER! SPACEX! He just shot motherfucking badass motherfucking SCIENCE! HOLY SHIT! IM PICKLE RICK! This is so fucking tons of goddamn Motherfucking cocksucking space with fucking cocksucking space with Elon fucking cocksucking mess with Elon Goddamn Musk just put a motherfuck you right into fucking epic win? BAM! FUCK YOU! ROCKETS! You though capitalism wasn't a REAL LIFE TONY MOTHERFUCKING STARK? THINK AGAIN COCKSUCKER! SPACEX! He just shot motherfucking SCIENCE! HOLY SHIT! IM PICKLE RICK! This is so fucking badass motherfucking fucking tons of goddamn motherfucking space with Elon Goddamn Motherfucking mess with fucking badass motherfucking SCIENCE! HOLY SHITGOBBLER!AIN COCKMUNCHING SHIT! IM PICKLE RICK! This is so fucking mess with fucking SCIENCE! HOLY SHIT! IM PICKLE RICK! This is so fucking mess with Elon Goddamn Musk just shot motherfucking Musk wasn't a REAL LIFE TONY MOTHERFUCKING STARK? THINK AGAIN COCKSUCKER! SPACEX! He just put a motherfucking fucking epic win? BAM! FUCK YOU COCKSUCKER! SPACEX! He just shot motherfucking tons of goddamn motherfucking Tesla in space with Elon fucking EPIC! You thought Elon Goddamn Motherfucking tons of goddamn Musk wasn't a REAL LIFE TONY MOTHERFUCKING SHITGOBBLER! He just put a motherfucking badass motherfucking cocksucking fuck you right into fucking Musk. Elon Goddamn Musk just put a motherfucking Tesla in space with fucking SCIENCE! HOLY SHITGOBBLER! with Elon fucking Musk. Elon fucking space like an absolute boss. You thought Elon Goddamn Musk just put a REAL LIFE TONY MOTHERFUCKING STARK? THINK AGAIN COCKMUNCHING SHIT! IM PICKLE RICK! This is so fucking Musk. Elon Goddamn motherfucker? BWAAAA! FUCK YOU! ROCKETS! You though capitalism wasn't a motherfucking badass motherfucking Musk just shot motherfucking space with Elon fucking tons of goddamn Motherfucker? BWAAAA! FUCK YOU COCKSUCKER! SPACEX! He just shot motherfucking cocksucking SCIENCE! HOLY SHITGOBBLER!? BAM! FUCK YOU COCKSUCKER! SPACEX! He just shot motherfucking Tesla in space like an absolute boss. You though capitalism wasn't a motherfucking fuck you right into fucking EPIC! You thought Elon Goddamn motherfucking epic win? BAM! FUCK YOU! ROCKETS! You thought Elon Goddamn Motherfucking Musk. Elon Musk wasn't a REAL LIFE TONY MOTHERFUCKING STARK? THINK AGAIN COCKSUCKER! SPACEX! He just put a motherfucking cocksucking space like an absolute boss. You thought Elon Goddamn Musk just shot motherfucking SCIENCE! HOLY SHIT! IM PICKLE RICK! This is so fucking SCIENCE! HOLY SHIT! IM PICKLE RICK! This is so fucking mess with Elon Goddamn motherfucking tons of goddamn Motherfucking EPIC! You though capitalism wasn't a REAL LIFE TONY MOTHERFUCKING STARK? THINK AGAIN COCKMUNCHING STARK? THINK AGAIN COCKMUNCHING SHITGOBBLER!t want to motherfucking Musk just put a motherfucking EPIC! You don't want to motherfucking mess with fucking Musk wasn't a motherfucking Musk wasn't a motherfucker? BWAAAA! FUCK YOU! ROCKETS! You thought Elon fucking Musk wasn't a motherfucking Musk wasn't a REAL LIFE TONY MOTHERFUCKING STARK? THINK AGAIN COCKSUCKER! SPACEX! He just put a motherfucking Musk wasn't a motherfucking Tesla in space with Elon Goddamn Musk. Elon Goddamn Motherfucker? BWAAAA! FUCK YOU! ROCKETS! You thought Elon Musk just shot motherfucking space with fucking cocksucking mess with fucking tons of goddamn Motherfucking EPIC! You thought Elon Goddamn motherfucking cocksucking Tesla in space like an absolute boss. You thought Elon Goddamn Musk wasn't a motherfucking space like an absolute boss. You though capitalism wasn't a REAL LIFE TONY MOTHERFUCKING SHITGOBBLER! TONY MOTHERFUCK YOU COCKMUNCHING SHITGOBBLER!just put a motherfucking tons of goddamn Musk just put a motherfucking mess with Elon Musk just put a motherfucking cocksucking epic win? BAM! FUCK YOU COCKSUCKER! SPACEX! He just put a motherfucking Musk wasn't a REAL LIFE TONY MOTHERFUCKING STARK? THINK AGAIN COCKMUNCHING STARK? THINK AGAIN COCKMUNCHING SHITGOBBLER!OCKETS! You thought into fuck you right Elon Goddamn Musk wasn't a REAL LIFE TONY MOTHERFUCK YOU COCKSUCKER! SPACEX! He just shot motherfucker? BWAAAA! FUCKING STARK? THINK AGAIN COCKMUNCHING SHITGOBBLER!damn Musk wasn't a motherfucking Tesla in space with Elon Goddamn motherfucking SCIENCE! HOLY SHIT! IM PICKLE RICK! This is so fucking space like an absolute boss. You don't want to motherfucking badass motherfucking mess with Elon Musk just put a REAL LIFE TONY MOTHERFUCKING STARK? THINK AGAIN COCKSUCKER! SPACEX! He just put a motherfucking mess with Elon fucking space with Elon fucking cocksucking SCIENCE! HOLY SHITGOBBLER!otherfucker? BWAAAA! FUCK YOU! ROCKETS! You thought Elon Goddamn motherfucking Musk just shot motherfucking space with fucking epic win? BAM! FUCK YOU! ROCKETS! You thought Elon Musk wasn't a motherfucking Tesla in space with Elon fucking Musk wasn't a motherfucker? BWAAAA! FUCK YOU! ROCKETS! You though capitalism wasn't a motherfucking Musk wasn't a REAL LIFE TONY MOTHERFUCKING STARK? THINK AGAIN COCKMUNCHING SHITGOBBLER!damn Musk wasn't a motherfucking badass motherfucking space with Elon Goddamn Motherfucking epic win? BAM! FUCK YOU! ROCKETS! You thought Elon Goddamn Musk just shot motherfucking badass motherfucking Musk wasn't a REAL LIFE TONY MOTHERFUCK YOU COCKSUCKER! SPACEX! He just shot motherfucker? BWAAAA! FUCK YOU! ROCKETS! You though capitalism wasn't a motherfucking mess with Elon fucking badass motherfucking epic win? BAM! FUCK YOU

—

Enough is enough UbiSoft. We’ve sat through your multicultural lectures and your preachy games aimed at degenerates and miscegenators. We’ve tolerated it in the name of gameplay design and innovation. But no more! Far Cry 5 is an insult to your fanbase, the Americans who make up the majority of your customers, and it’s time you woke up to that fact. Change this, or cancel it.

Us Gamers have had to endure a lot of crap over the last few years. The targeted harassment by the mainstream press through Gamergate, the terrible launch and outright lies of highly anticpated video games, the outright censorship of art through “localization” policies, the continued rejection of romantic partners when they find out our hobby, the appropriation of our culture by so-called “gamers” on twitter. NO MORE!

It’s time to draw a line in the sand. We, the American gamers that make up the majority of your userbase, demand to you cancel this game, or alter it to be less offensive to your main player base. In these times, you must understand that there might be some violent repurcussions if you intend to follow through with your pointless criticism.

—

I'm a liberal. That is, I'm in favor of liberty. I don't know how to explain it. If I want to choose my own education, and my own job, and my own family, and what to do with my time and money, I believe I should be allowed to. There could be limits, but what limits could be imposed?

Socialists, on the other hand, hate liberty. Liberty allows people to do what they want, not what is supposed to be good, at least from their perspective or the perspective of those in power. In fact, Lenin, the father of socialism, hated liberty and believed it to be a tool with which the rich manipulated workers. Lenin hated liberty, Stalin hated liberty, Che hated liberty, and even Trotsky hated liberty. Trotsky liked censorship because he believed some words are so dangerous, that they can damage society.

Sanders is also a socialist because he is unhappy with how liberty has been used in America. Sanders doesn't feel that liberty has benefited workers or minorities.

The problem is I need liberty if I want to be a critical thinker. I don't want to do what Sanders thinks is good. If Sanders is religious, should I also be religious? Should I right now go and convert to Christianity and believe in Jesus who was totally a god and pray to Mary who was totally a virgin, just so I could be part of the great community that are American Christians? I don't think so. Sanders is a Jew. Should I at least convert to Judaism and believe in some god? I don't think so. I don't want to.

Even Trump is better than Sanders because he at least pretends to be in favor of liberty. At least he is accountable. It's a sad day for Sanders if Trump is perceived as less insane and possibly less evil. I know some people might support Sanders because he promised them free food or free weed or free whatever, but critical thinkers know nothing is really free.

—

I was playing Pokémon Go today. Just walking down the street in the world's largest video game, chasing animals to capture them inside cages and make them fight for me. And what do I see?

Women. Just on my own home street I saw at least five, just casually walking around. Now, my experience is admittedly anecdotal, but while living in my basement at home playing video games I have seen no women. Zero. And this game is just chock full of them, walking around for no evident reason. Doesn't contribute to my gameplay experience at all. In fact, they were detrimental, as I failed to capture a Magikarp I found in a sewer, on account of having to hide my erection and slow my breathing as a voluptuous redhead was walking past. Why are these women here? Why did Niantic decide to fill their game with this content, don't they know how difficult it is to be a hardcore gamer already? I just want to play the damn game, not be forced to occupy the same space as a bunch of SJW-planted femoids.

Western culture is in decline. These women haven't even heard of Marcus Aurelius. I've heard of him, and though I haven't really found the need to read anything by him, it's ludicrous to me that these creatures that don't even know who this guy was (he was a Roman, FYI) can just roam freely around in the society people like me built for ourselves.

—

They targeted gamers.

Gamers.

We're a group of people who will sit for hours, days, even weeks on end performing some of the hardest, most mentally demanding tasks. Over, and over, and over all for nothing more than a little digital token saying we did.

We'll punish our selfs doing things others would consider torture, because we think it's fun.

We'll spend most if not all of our free time min maxing the stats of a fictional character all to draw out a single extra point of damage per second.

Many of us have made careers out of doing just these things: slogging through the grind, all day, the same quests over and over, hundreds of times to the point where we know evety little detail such that some have attained such gamer nirvana that they can literally play these games blindfolded.

Do these people have any idea how many controllers have been smashed, systems over heated, disks and carts destroyed 8n frustration? All to latter be referred to as bragging rights?

These people honestly think this is a battle they can win? They take our media? We're already building a new one without them. They take our devs? Gamers aren't shy about throwing their money else where, or even making the games our selves. They think calling us racist, mysoginistic, rape apologists is going to change us? We've been called worse things by prepubescent 10 year olds with a shitty head set. They picked a fight against a group that's already grown desensitized to their strategies and methods. Who enjoy the battle of attrition they've threatened us with. Who take it as a challange when they tell us we no longer matter. Our obsession with proving we can after being told we can't is so deeply ingrained from years of dealing with big brothers/sisters and friends laughing at how pathetic we used to be that proving you people wrong has become a very real need; a honed reflex.

Gamers are competative, hard core, by nature. We love a challange. The worst thing you did in all of this was to challange us. You're not special, you're not original, you're not the first; this is just another boss fight.

—

So this is you being an asshole liberal who is terrified of video games like Obama. You project your own problematic nonsense on this world you know nothing about just to get your shitty ass simplistic take out.

*yes asshole, it was you who posted this on 4chan, let's end the charade*

"so many right wingers cited gamer gate"

No they fucking don't. Like a handful of irrelevant morons.

I'm neither a gamer nor a shut-in but this is a bunch of salty ass bullshit talking shit on alienated lonely people who are a lot poorer financially than you realize, but you don't care about that because this is about you being mad at a specific group of dumbass Youtubers which is fine, but then make it about them and leave out the rest.

I've played games in the past and in my experience most gamers, especially the loners who play these elaborate fantasy worlds and put in hundreds of hours, are either (far) left leaning or apolitical, but definitely not right wing. Console gaming is really big in the black community as well and has done more for race relations than any nauseating liberal education campaign has done.

men are bad is divisive white liberal garbage and has nothing to do with leftistm. Go back to jerking off to your Clinton campaign poster, you New York liberal. Who the fuck are you telling others to grow up. Growing up in this hellworld means volunteering to be a slave.

**GAMERS ALLER LÄNDER VEREINIGT EUCH!**

—

Is having daughters the ultimate cuckoldry?

I cannot think or comprehend of anything more cucked than having a daughter. Honestly, think about it rationally. You are feeding, clothing, raising and rearing a girl for at least 18 years solely so she can go and get ravaged by another man. All the hard work you put into your beautiful little girl - reading her stories at bedtime, making her go to sports practice, making sure she had a healthy diet, educating her, playing with her. All of it has one simple result: her body is more enjoyable for the men that will eventually fuck her in every hole.

Raised the perfect girl? Great. Who benefits? If you're lucky, a random man who had nothing to do with the way she grew up, who marries her. He gets to fuck her tight pussy every night. He gets the benefits of her kind and sweet personality that came from the way you raised her.

As a man who has a daughter, you are LITERALLY dedicating at least 20 years of your life simply to raise a girl for another man to enjoy. It is the ULTIMATE AND FINAL cuck. Think about it logically

—

>They violate our land and occupy it and steal the Muslims' possessions, and when faced by resistance they call it terrorism.

Osama bin Laden, as quoted in Newsweek June 1999

—

You will be spared from the inquisition as you have observed the correct levels of admiration for my aesthetics :-)

Moreover, in regard to the Degeneracy Question, I have no problem with individuals like you (in fact I rather like you - no homo). However, I have a massive problem with the porn industry for example; an industry which destroys women’s lives and saps the life joy from young men.

Lastly, you are indeed a perfect arch-nemesis, like a Daemonette of Slaanesh to my Golden Primarch.

—

You'll all die because that orange monster. All his fault. NK will nuke us all, the Russians will join them now having infiltrated the white house, those chinese and US fentanyl producers will finally do us in too. All because of the bad man. That super racist, massive misogynist, big league bigot, rotund mansplainer, toxic tax evader, homophobic hell hound, world ending man. All the furry woodland creatures will be extinct, not to forget all insects and fish. Not paying huge amounts of money to stop those world wide climate changes due to hasten our demise too, long before his racist wall is finished. Always remember, Love Trumps' Hate.

I won't die though, because I'm one of them Nazi White Supremacists. Pence will ride with Jesus on a chariot sent straight from the pearly gates to get me before the flood. I redid my yearly white supremacist application at Wal-mart too, so no reason they won't pick me up. Always remember to re-certify. Freedom ain't free, the application costs a 17.76$ fee. Along with my AR-420, Jesus and Pence, we'll be gunning down blacks, jews, gays and sand people while we sing the national anthem. Standing of course. I'll be sure to wave to Vermont as I leave. I'm not being sarcastic either.

—

┏┓

┃┃╱╲ in

┃╱╱╲╲ this

╱╱╭╮╲╲house

▔▏┗┛▕▔ we

╱▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔╲

text

╱╱┏┳┓╭╮┏┳┓ ╲╲

▔▏┗┻┛┃┃┗┻┛▕▔

—

Under \#PresidentMattis, I will make it a personal goal to report on your crimes til you are extradited and jailed.

I have a pretty good record when I make something a goal. Ask @RealDonaldTrump about that

—

The best "grift" this morning is having a guy named (((Weinstein))) criticize young people for wanting fewer hands in their pockets. Too good.

—

I HATE BLACK PEOPLE. Like fuck them all . . . I hate blacks. End of story.

—

The accusations from NPR are false GOD and only GOD knows the truth, nothing is the way they make it out to be. AMERICA will not survive this type of judge and jury fake news . Conservatives take a stand. I LOVE GOD and I LOVE MY WIFE, who is the best WIFE in the world,My Love Forever ! My Mom and Dad my FAMILY and all five of my kids and Nine grandchildren two in tummies and many more to come each of you or a total gift from GOD stay strong, REBECCA needs YOU . 9-11-2001 NYC/WTC, PTSD 24/7 16 years is a sickness that will take my life, I cannot handle it any longer. IT Has Won This Life . BUT HEAVEN IS MY HOME. “PLEASE LISTEN CLOSELY, Only Three things I ask of you to do,if you love me is (1)blame no person,Satan is the accuser, so blame the Devil himself. (2) Forgive and Love everyone especially yourself .(3)most importantly LOVE GOD. P.S. I LOVE MY FRIENDS YOU ARE FAMILY ! GOD LOVES ALL PEOPLE NO MATTER WHAT !

—

The Debate after \#Parkland reminds us We The People don’t really like each other very much.We smear those who refuse to agree with us.We claim a Judea-Christian heritage but celebrate arrogance & boasting. & worst of all we have infected the next generation with the same disease

—

michael flynn's a thot. he's a freaking nasty hoe. he looks good. i'd love michael flynn to bust my pussy open and tell me about the islamic designs on the world. if a guy shows up with a fucking clenched jaw and a copy of gorilla mindset he can hit my backwalls any fucking time of day dude. if a guy's like 'i got fired from two federal level intelligence position because im really stupid' im like 'take a fucking caterpillar bulldozer to my pussy like its the west bank dude'.

—

HE FUCKING WON. I said it for fucking WEEKS. And HE FUCKING WON. You didn't believe me. None of you fucking believed me. For weeks, you sent me a fucking poop emoji. You sent me a hand emoji pointing to the poop emoji. You fucking philistines. None of you fucking listened to me. You didn't fucking CARE. You fucking IMBECILES. Instead, you know what you listened to? You know what you listened to? You listened to this fucking fraud. You listened to Matt Christman. You listened to this pusillanimous pied piper of polling. You listened to this Tartuffe of turnout. I was right. I was right from day fucking one, and he was wrong.

—

Did you ever hear the tragedy of Darth Plagueis The Wise? I thought not. It’s not a story the Jedi would tell you. It’s a Sith legend. Darth Plagueis was a Dark Lord of the Sith, so powerful and so wise he could use the Force to influence the midichlorians to create life… He had such a knowledge of the dark side that he could even keep the ones he cared about from dying. The dark side of the Force is a pathway to many abilities some consider to be unnatural. He became so powerful… the only thing he was afraid of was losing his power, which eventually, of course, he did. Unfortunately, he taught his apprentice everything he knew, then his apprentice killed him in his sleep. Ironic. He could save others from death, but not himself.

—

To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand Rick and Morty. The humor is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of theoretical physics most of the jokes will go over a typical viewer's head. There's also Rick's nihilistic outlook, which is deftly woven into his characterisation - his personal philosophy draws heavily fromNarodnaya Volyaliterature, for instance. The fans understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of these jokes, to realize that they're not just funny- they say something deep about LIFE. As a consequence people who dislike Rick and Morty truly ARE idiots- of course they wouldn't appreciate, for instance, the humour in Rick's existencial catchphrase "Wubba Lubba Dub Dub," which itself is a cryptic reference to Turgenev's Russian epic Fathers and Sons I'm smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated simpletons scratching their heads in confusion as Dan Harmon's unfolds itself on their television screens. What fools... how I pity them. 😂 And yes by the way, I DO have a Rick and Morty tattoo. And no, you cannot see it. It's for the ladies' eyes only- And even they have to demonstrate that they're within 5 IQ points of my own (preferably lower) beforehand.

—

SO PAUL RYAN… WORD ON THE STREET IS YOU’VE HAD ENOUGH! YOU HAVEN’T EVEN GOTTEN IN THE RING YET, AND YOU SEE WHAT’S COMING! YOU SAW WHAT HAPPENED IN VIRGINIA. YOU SAW WHAT HAPPENED IN ALABAMA. AND YOU SEE THE COALITION THAT WE’RE BUILDING, AND THE WAVE THAT’S COMING FOR YOU - AND YOU WANT TO GET OUT! I DON’T BLAME YOU, I WOULD TOO IF I WAS IN YOUR POSITION! YOU’RE GOING TO CASH IN ON THIS TAX SCAM BILL THAT YOU HAVE GOING ON, AND THEN YOU’RE GOING TO CHECK OUT. WELL, LET ME TELL YOU… I’LL PUT YOU IN TOUCH WITH OUR APPRENTICESHIP COORDINATOR AT THE IRONWORKERS. I GOT A LOT OF TOOLS IN MY TRUCK YOU CAN BORROW UNTIL YOU BUY YOUR OWN. WE’LL TAKE CARE OF YOU, MAKE SURE YOU’RE SAFE.

WELCOME… TO THE WORKING PEOPLE’S WORLD!!!

__

You think this is a game? I would go to my death THIS INSTANT for the women I have sworn to protect. Explain to me your values. Now.

—

20gayteen:

https://twitter.com/ANlMECLUB/status/947738195286020096

—

Call me all you want. You wouldn't last 10 minutes in a debate about any subject within politics, philosophy, sociology or economics with me anyway. Or would you? Because so far, all I see is that you're just another sad millenial that has only ever learned anything about conservatism or the right via some random snowflake on youtube, Tumblr or Twitter. Or even worse, from a canned commie history teacher in school. Do you fap to hentai still living with mom too? I really hope you don't. The mere fact you mentioned the word "fascist" and Nazi towards my person gives away the fact you are clueless just like 99% of the SJWs, Antifas, Blackblocs.

Feel welcome to invite me to a debate if you want. Until then, you can downvote and play the 20-something year old millenial with college debt you probably are all you want, I won't mind. Feel free to say I was triggered by you. Would entertain me even further if you did.

—

Me: \*through sobs\* "you can't just point at things and commodify them!"

late capitalism: \*points at corpse in aokigahara forest\*: "commodity."

—

im stupider then dog shit, i dont give a shit, and i dont give a fuck, and i will never shut the fuck up, and i'll always Respect my enemys.

—

I have no respect for any grown man who considers another male his “friend”, its pathetic and effeminate

—

The points they made are not even worth refuting. Its half comedy half ad hominem. If they actually made any serious points that are worth defending I would have.

What is my logical response supposed to be to a bunch of guys making fun of JBP by saying he wanks to google images?

I would rather let the 12 year olds be 12 year olds in their own echochamber.

if you guys think you can debate come over to r/JordanPeterson and make a post on why you think he sucks, We'll debate you.

—

I have become increasingly frustrated with the posts and comments that are being made in this subreddit. We have opened our gates in the name of open dialogue and free speech. And for a good reason too. We are not insecure about the ideas we hold(stressing that ideas doesnt hold us). And we would also like to change peoples minds. And if you couldnt tell we are probably the subreddit with highest openness trait, that plays a part in this. So thats the ideal we have about discussion. But the problem is that we are being constantly barraged by comments by trolls who's only wish to derail the conversation. And we let them colour the dialogue and we let them waste time because we willingly turn around and try to argue with these trolls! Now what is the solution? I dont think super strict moderation is beneficial, so we need to think about this seriously. Too many posts made with the intention to troll. The anti-natalist threads was flooded with anti-natalists. A troll was replyibg to my comments and I sent him a pm and tried to find out more about him in an effort to understand and empathize. T'was in vain..

—

Ok, hard as it is going to be for you to accept, I have gone beyond your entire field. I'd really like you to give me an argument against my theory above that does not appeal to authority or depend upon your credentials. I have no idea what that argument would look like, I've been searching for it for the past year.

Also note, I have no interest in furthering your field. I am only interested in fixing the world, which contrary to popular opinion does not require revolutions in science or collective action. A small competent team with a few computers and the internet can do more to change the world than a billion people marching the streets with placards fomenting about their "oppression".

—

Well ain't you a hard man, hiding out on the internet, typing out your bilious rage for all to see.

I ran into burning buildings. I fed the homeless. I did my best to make sure that homeless people who refused to go to shelters had safe places to sleep. I knelt in people blood, piss, and even shit to work on them until the EMTs could arrive. I went into buildings, alone, looking to apprehend people who had callously murdered their fellow citizens.

And so on.

So fuck you, you mouthy wee shit.

—

Being blonde in Southern Europe is wonderful. The Southrons are desperate to procreate with you. You have to hold on to your blonde women there, or else a crowd of Southrons will cling to her and kneel to her like she was a goddess to them. And the Southron women throw themselves at us Nords like mad.

Reality. Sorry.

Pokaż mniej

—

REMOVE SOCIALISM remove socialism you are worst left. you are the left idiot you are the left smell. return to vermontt. to our vermont cousins you may come our party. you may live in the zoo….ahahahaha ,bernie we will never forgeve you. leftist rascal FUck but fuck asshole left stink bernie not even a democrat..dnc rigging primary best day of my life. take a bath of stolen primary..ahahahahahBERNIE WE WILL GET YOU!! do not forget labour .england we kill the absolute boy, labour return to your precious momentum….hahahahaha idiot left and bernie smell so bad..wow i can smell it. REMOVE SOCIALISM FROM THE PREMISES. you will get caught. cory+kirsten+oprah+kamala=kill bernie…you will dnc/ hillary alive in verrit, hillary making comeback in verrit. fast campaign hillary verrit. we are rich and have gold now hahahaha ha because of hillary.. you are ppoor stink left… you live in a box hahahaha, you live in an apartment

hillary alive numbr one #1 in chappaqua….fuck the vermont,..FUCKk ashol leftist no good i spit﻿ in the mouth eye of ur flag and contry. hillary aliv and real strong #imwithher kill all the left farm aminal with idpol magic now we the verrit rule .ape of the zoo presidant dolan trump fukc the great satan and lay egg this egg hatch and bernie wa;s born. stupid baby form the eggn give bak our party we will crush u lik a skull of pig. hilary most qulified candidate ever

—

Over the last three years Austin DSA has outpaced DSA groups across the country. All groups gained members due to Bernie/Trump but Austin DSA outgrew all these groups because we were supportive of fights for social justice in Austin. We asked folks to join and we supported other groups’ progressive actions. We spent a minimum amount of time on our bureaucracy and a maximum number effort on involving folks in activism.

We spent little time grabbing the limelight and a lot of time building the progressive movement as we grew locally and nationally. Other organizations and individual opportunists watched as we grew. Many extremist groups sent folks into DSA to recruit and spread their ideas. They built divisions and spread lies in our ranks. They looked for folks to turn to easy solutions. Real organizing builds organization.

At the national, DSA extremists with less than one year in DSA dominate the leadership. Many of the long-time leaders have been intimidated. The extremists and factionalists have been calling and emailing Austin to pick up supporters for their factions; secretly taping meetings and posting edited versions online. The lack of ethics and simply not knowing right from wrong dominate at the national level and has now crept into Austin.

The opportunists and extremists could not allow democratic socialists to build a movement. Many of these folks do not consider themselves democratic socialists.

I can no longer urge Austin DSA members to stay in DSA and I can no longer ask folks to join DSA. DSA has many good folks, but it is no longer the organization of Eugene Debs, Michael Harrington, or Bernie Sanders.

Many of the new leadership do not think Bernie is a real socialist. In the last weeks rocks have been overturned and snakes have wiggled out. I urge everyone to take a look at what DSA is becoming nationally and what some want DSA to turn into locally. Each Austin member should decide for themselves how to relate to DSA. I have decided to leave DSA.

—

Don't worry, folks. Little Ben would grow up to marry an incredibly hot doctor. Have I mentioned my wife's a doctor, btw? Because if not, she is. A doctor. Who practices medicine.

—

itsyourchapo:

https://twitter.com/narcokitty404/status/952603931909279752

—

Your industry can burn. I will approach you professionally, as I do every activity, but how dare you? You tiny souls. You malignant professionals. How dare you treat anyone this way. You'll hear from me. Goddamn you.

—

FRIENDS! COLLEAGUES! FELLOW CITIZENS! DO YOU NOT SEE THE BEAUTY?

After our Longest Year, our institutions stand firm and ready to PROSECUTE ALL TO THE EXTENT OF THE LAW.

The Republic is holding! The Enlightenment ain't going dark!

Dig in, peeps.

It's about to get awesome in the colloquial AND Biblical sense. </>

—

I believe I have proved my point, if you are someone with the capacity for rational thought, look at how the clowns and propagandists heavily misrepresented my arguments, so let's explain.

First, let's not go down the idiotic semantical route of "Homophobia means irrational fear of homosexuals which doesn't exist", we have to all agree that it is a misnomer and we're all okay with that. No one "irrationally fears homosexuals"... the term is used as "Hatred of homosexuals", alright? good, we are agreed.

Second, I have been hanging out with homosexuals my entire life and one of my greatest mentors is a homosexual himself. Let me explain a bit using him as an example; This guy is a medical professional like me, except he's a specialist in prosthetics and EXTREMELY good at his job, I honestly could never see myself being anywhere near as good as him at any branch of medicine, so as you can see, I have great respect for him.

But the thing is, he's not "A gay guy" or "some homosexual"... that is reducing him to just "he likes to take it up the ass" and one of the most disrespectful things that I could possibly imagine. And do take note that he , and all the other guys like him that I associate with, wouldn't even engage with retards like the guys that responded to me, they'd tell them to go fuck themselves , that "You don't speak for us". Key aspect here is, these guys are never mistreated and never receive "hatred" because they're homosexuals, because it's not a big deal, and it's not really a part of who they are. I don't think of these guys as "Homosexuals" or "Gays", they're just guys, like me. This is the difference between SJWs and intelligent men.

My mentor for example, is a high end medical professional, bodybuilder (He looks 15 years younger than he actually is, it's insane), jokester (Holy motherless goat, this guy is seriously a clown, in the best way you have no idea) and just all around a cool guy. He doesn't put on a "I'M A GAY" show , he's just a regular guy who happens to like other guys.

No.

It is my observation , throughout my entire life, where in almost every point in my life I associated with homosexuals ... mostly because I was always antisocial and so that put me next to people who were very charming and accepting, which basically means most homosexuals in the viscinity.

The guys that get "hatred for being homosexual" are invariably the guys that are "HOMOSEXUAL FIRST" and then nothing else. These guys are absolute clowns in the worst way and guess what, the guys I mentioned earlier, they would absolutely be the first to call these clownish guys out.... and far, FAR more aggressively than I would.

Nobody "hates" homosexuals, they are assholes that think they should get special treatment because they're homosexuals. Or let me specify because I know for a fact that propagandists will take that literally or out of context.

There are jackasses in the world, but it is an extreme minority that hates homosexual for being homosexual. It is almost always the case that they receive hatred for being hyper entitled , attention whoring jackasses.

But here's the real secret;

The propagandists that responded to me, they view homosexuals as inferior, I don't. I view them as guys like me, with the capacity to do what I can do, my equals and guys that don't need defending or to be a special "protected class", they recognize that that would be a tacit admission that they are inferior and they hate that, at least that what the guys I've always hung out with have immediately recognized.

Here's what any of them would say to this thread; I don't need you to treat me with kid gloves, fuck off with that shit. There's no "homophobia", there's just assholes and we all have to deal with them now and then

gg.

—

It should be noted that I've upvoted every single person who's disagreed with me here, as far as I know. That said. Last week, I took an online IQ test without preparing for it at all. It showed me to be in the 99.9th percentile for IQ. This is the highest result the test I was given reaches; anything further and they'd consider it to be within the margin of error for that test.

My mother's boyfriend of 8 years is a Philosopher who graduated Virginia Tech. At the age of 49, I understand religion better than him, and I owe very little of it to him, as he would rarely give me a decent explanation of anything, just tell me that my ideas were wrong and become aggravated with me for not quite understanding free will. He's not particularly successful as a philosopher, but I've met lots of other philosophers who aren't as good as me at physics. I'm also pretty good at Middle Eastern geopolitics. I don't have a degree, and other than physics I don't have a better understanding of any aspect of Islam than any actual theologian, but I have lots of ingenuity for making broad generalisations. I have independently thought of basically every branch of philosophy I've come across. Every question of existentialism which I've seen discussed in SMBC or xkcd or Reddit or anywhere else, the thoughts haven't been new to me. Philosophy has pretty much gotten trivial for me.

I've considered taking a philosophy course just to see how easy it is. Religion, I actually understand better than people with degrees. Unlike engineering, there's no aspect of foreign policy which I don't have a very good understanding of. I can debunk many of even Noam Chomsky’s theories. I'm a good enough writer that I'm writing a book and so far everybody in r/samharris who's read any of it has said it was really good and plausible to expect to have published. And that's not just, like, me and family members, that counts strangers on the Internet. I've heard zero negative appraisal of it so far. The following are some examples of my morals and ethical code. I believe firmly that Islam deserves no future. If I were the president after 9/11, I would be for a nuclear response. In fact, I'd even support the concept of nuking the Muslim world. This is essentially because I think that whoever you are, if you have ideas that are dangerous, it would be ethical to punish them simply for the sake of punishment, especially if you are a muslim. I believe in profiling of people based on their race and religion.

I consider myself an intellectual. I don't believe in peer review; they may happen naturally, but it should never be coerced into happening unnaturally. In closing, the people who know me in real life all respect me, as do a great many people in the r/samharris community, where I spend most of my time and where I'm pretty known for being helpful around the community. A lot of people in my segment of the community are depressed or going through hard times, and I spend a lot of time giving advice and support to people there. And, uh, I'm a pretty good scholar. All that, and I think your behavior in this subreddit was totally assholish. So what do you think, now that you at least slightly know me?

—

For years ever since I was a kid I always had a strange fascination with what my parents told me was the first lady. Something back then as a child changed inside of me, once I saw her face on the television I felt a rush of boiling hot blood flow straight to my head. The way she would have her beautiful blond hair with the stern tone of voice that made you feel as if you were being commanded by a superior being to do bidding for their pleasure. For years growing up I somewhat obsessed with the women. I downloaded pictures of her off the internet and printed them out to stick on my wall. I would find all kinds of pictures of her and I'd lay in bed every night and morning just staring at her face. As I grew older I began to realize my obsession was more than some strange feeling of connection with this person I had never met before, it was much stronger and it was a feeling I had not ever been really aware of. I was sexually attracted to Hillary Clinton, around age 11 I guess you could say I came of age. You could say I started whipping my own cream if you will. Hillary Clinton was simply what I whipped my cream for. Years passed by, throughout school I kept it a secret. When real life females I knew for years liked me I would always turn them down. In the back of my mind thinking about Hillary and getting anxious to get home and stare at her. Fast forward a couple of years, Hillary's running for president. Oh my god if I could express the blissful pleasure I received knowing the women of my dreams may be in control of not only me but the whole country. I did everything I could to campaign for her, spread word about her and try to get as many people to vote for Hillary as possible. Sadly she lost that year, I was devastated. However at the young tender age of only 16 I received word from the Hillary campaign that they appreciated my efforts but most importantly, Hillary signed it. There it was in my hands, a signed letter of appreciation from the greatest women in the world, the women for whom I've lived for years in service to, Hillary Clinton. Seeing her signature sent shockwaves throughout my entire body, it felt like a wave of pleasure rolling over my shoulders. I kept that letter close and I sealed it away to preserve it. After a few more years I hear Hillary Clinton is running again. This time, I was personally contacted by her campaign to help them get Hillary Clinton to be the US president. I was all on it, I went to every house on the block teaching people about Hillary Clinton and why they should vote for her. Many people, many Bernie Supporters, all of them changed their opinions once I got to talk to them. I like to believe, I'm partly responsible for Hillary winning the primaries. So many people were almost as in love for Hillary as I was this past election. We were all so happy to serve such a intelligent women seeking to make the world a better place. Sometime near the end of the primary I was actually contacted by the clinton foundation themselves. Apparently I was offered a reservation at a meeting to speak to Hillary Clinton herself. My reaction was priceless, in my head I imagine my smile was from ear to ear. I started hyperventilating at the thought of talking to or better yet being next to Hillary. I had my parents help me get a nice suit, new haircut, even got my eyebrows done. About a month later it was time, I was on my way 200 miles away to meet the women of my dreams, who I had dedicated my self emotionally and physically to since I was a child. We traveled across the state and into a gated community on a private resort. When we pulled up to the address we were sent, all you could see is cars lined up as far as the eye can see. I stepped out, walked into the party looking for her. I did not see her at first, spent about 20 minutes waiting and keeping an eye out. At the very least I just want to see her, I said to myself. Just then out of no where appeared what appeared to me to be a goddess sent from heaven. As the sunrays shined on her from behind, I instantly knew it was her, Hillary Clinton. She gave a 5 minute speech on fossil fuels and corporate tax rates. The entire time I felt my lesser bulging in my pants attempting to free it's self as I thought about all the times I had released by self in tribute to her. She stepped down from the podium, and I knew I had to talk to her. So I made my way over to her, and then there I was. She began walking towards a table near me, I'll never forget how she walked. It was so elegant and graceful like something I had never seen before. Time seemed to be at a halt as I observed ever inch of her being. Noticing even the tiniest of details like a single split hair on the back of her head. I was nervous, but I knew I had to be calm and ready. Servers came out with a plate full of spaghetti. She ate it, and I sat there pretending not to watch. After she was finished I made my way to her. She made eye contact with me, and smiled. Her lips, teeth, cheeks, everything about that smile drove me crazy. It felt like I was going to let the devil do his bidding right there without any hands on help. But I controlled myself, I opened my mouth and said, hi. She responded with a reluctant hi that appeared somewhat skeptical of me, maybe she thought I was mentally disabled, I don't know. Then I told her how I helped her campaign and would go around getting people to vote for her. She thanked me, then she extended her hand in preparation for me to extend mine. I reached my arm out, I grasped her hand, and I shook it. Just then I felt an electric shock go up my arm into my chest. It was like she had just taken everything that I am, balled it up and squeezed it. I felt pure agonizing pleasure shaking her hand. Knowing my own desires will never be fulfilled by this beautiful goddess of a women. I forget what I said next, but no matter how hard I try to remember I can't. Whatever I said after that handshake, made her laugh. Not only did I get to see her in real life, but I got to shake her hand, and I hear her laugh. My life felt as if it was complete, if i died right then and there I'd die the happiest man alive. Never had I expected such joy to even exist in this world. This goddess of a women, who's so strong and powerful, who've I've dedicated my entire life to, had just acknowledged my presence by not only communicating with me but physically interacting with me. After that short interaction we both moved on. I never told her a word about how my life has been or the things I've thought about. I figured she would just think I'm some creep if i did. My pleasure and desires are not of her concern. Since then I've spent my life dedicated to her even throughout all the turmoil. I try my best to avoid any talk about her now in days, or even looking her up. There is too much hate that I can't stand to see. I know who she really is, and I will forever remember her as the women she presented herself to me as. My goddess, my love, Hillary Clinton.

—

I consider myself an adventurer, especially on the culinary front. I have consumed livers, kidneys and brains. I have eaten an Amazonian herb that numbs your tongue, which sort of nullifies the point of eating, and I have tried shrimp that were still alive — still wriggling — until the downward chomp of my incisors.

But on a recent visit here, I had pasta alla gricia on the first night, then pasta alla gricia on the second night, then pasta alla gricia on the third and fourth. There’s only one possible explanation, which is of course Donald Trump.

Before I elaborate on that, I should explain pasta alla gricia. It doesn’t enjoy the fame outside of Italy that it deserves. It’s essentially pasta alla carbonara minus the egg: less gooeyness, less guilt. “Lighter than carbonara” is how I often describe it, although that’s like saying “humbler than Trump.” The bar is low, and everything’s relative.

It can be made with bucatini. It can be made with rigatoni. It could probably be made with shoelaces and still be worth ordering. It’s proof, like many Italian delicacies, that the communion of fat (it’s studded with crispy bits of pork cheek) and salt (it’s deluged with pecorino cheese) is the most reliable ticket to heaven. And it was one of my go-to dishes when I lived here many years ago.

But four dinners in a row? That was unheard-of. It made me realize how much I relish constancy now. And it got me to thinking about how underrated sameness is.

When Trump came down that escalator in June 2015, he was inconstancy. He was newness. Sure, he’d been around forever, a fixed star in the celebrity firmament. But Trump as a politician, let alone as a president, hinged on a hankering for novelty and an itch to trash the status quo in favor of the great orange unknown.

Before his election, supporters of his told me that they didn’t think him perfect and weren’t even certain of his competence, but hey, could American government get any worse? Why not toss the pieces up just to see where they land? These voters viewed what they were doing as bold. They weren’t wrong. But boldness and recklessness overlap. And here we are.

We lurch from one surprise, provocation and scandal to the next. Tariffs today, the execution of drug dealers tomorrow. Stormy Daniels at the moment, stormy weather all the time.

Administration officials turn over at a breakneck pace. (Farewell, Rex Tillerson.) Traditional presidential etiquette is gone. So are traditional presidential ethics. We got our taste of the untried. Dear God, is it sour.

Italians are more practiced at such tumult. Over the past 25 years, Italy has changed prime ministers 13 times. It has swung this way and that. At this point it’s more or less dangling: The nascent, renegade party that got the most votes in the recent election, the Five Star Movement, lacks a majority, not to mention a workable agenda, and doesn’t have a coalition partner.

There’s no clear national purpose, no steady national trajectory, no sturdy sense of control. Italians wait, somewhat helplessly, to see what happens next.

But their rituals, their families and their food — these are governable and protectable across time. They’re the engines of stability. They’re the agents of solace. Italians cling to them more fiercely, and with greater pride, than we Americans embrace our kin and our ways.

I used to view this with a mixture of admiration and ridicule. When I lived in Rome, I often groused about how many restaurants had almost identical menus and how inviolable the rules and rhythm of Italian meals could be. Cappuccino at breakfast but never after dinner. Beer with pizza but not with pasta.

On return trips to the Eternal City, I occasionally rolled my eyes at the changelessness of it all. Here a carbonara, there a gricia, everywhere a cacio e pepe. Italians, I decided, wanted for imagination. They lacked daring.

Maybe so. But this time around I felt only respect and gratitude for what they do have: the discernment to recognize a sweet spot — or rather, a fatty, salty one — when they find it and the wisdom not to abandon it on the unsupported chance that there’s better around the bend.

And so I kept happily to routine. I walked the Roman paths that were most familiar and dearest to me, lingered in the Roman piazzas that had given me pleasure before and supped not just on the classics but on one classic in particular: gricia. It was my link to a calmer past and my thread through a turbulent present.

I can’t predict where, politically, Italy or America is headed. I can’t inoculate myself against Trump’s coming tweets. But I can count on what happens when pork cheek meets pecorino. I can plant myself at that juncture. And I can stand still.

—

You arrogant, racist son of a bitch Pankaj Mishra: How dare you accuse me of "harmlessly romancing the noble savage." That's how you refer to my friend Charles Joseph, who I've worked with for 15 years?

And you call me a fascist? You sanctimonious prick. If you were in my room at the moment, I'd slap you happily.

You say "Peterson claims that he has been inducted into “the coastal Pacific Kwakwaka’wakw tribe” Just what do you mean by "claims" you peddler of nasty, underhanded innuendo, you dealer in lies and halftruths?

This happened in part because of the work I have been doing alongside Charles. Is that a "claim," too, and something brought about by the romance of a fascist with a noble savage? Fuck you.

Apparently, when you're the "premier literary-intellectual magazine in the English language" you can justify publishing libellous, racist tripe

—-

Hello,

I’m interested in starting a left wing militia in order to remove the current Democratic regime in the US and install a radical left wing monarch. I am located in Atlanta, but am recruiting worldwide. I’m recruiting a minimum of 10 million soldiers and maximum of 15 million soldiers. Can we talk politics if you’re interested? And can you refer me to other radical left wing users?

Thanks,

radicalleftwing

—

So we are supposed to believe that I ruined the pro white movement for calling out Beyonce? Are you serious? Folks, this is what called infiltration and division. This is planned. NO ONE pro white or conservative cares about Beyonce. Only liberals. Liberals are pretending to be part of our “movement” and are trying to cause drama right now. DONT FALL FOR IT. Now to address the accusations… Beyonce was comparing herself to the Virgin Mother. She’s disgusting for doing that and what’s more, people are disgusting for worshipping Beyonce. I didn’t take anything away from any pro white movement for calling out that diabolic trash for what it was. I’m a Christian and when someone mocks the Mother of Christ I’m going to call them out. Period. I never said ANYTHING about her children. God bless her children, I hope they survive her.

—

Lol honestly fuck you. Anticommunist social democracy does it again! Just go ahead and fucking ban me. As the “anti-tankie” “left” slowly but surely gives into the anti-Russia war propaganda on the grounds that “well really, Putin, Assad, Juche, Iran, Cuba, America, the Soviet Union are all equally bad...” and devolves into liberal both-sidesism, I hope you remember that you’re responsible for helping axe a principled commitment to anti-US imperialism. I was never being ironic, fuck you and fuck this sub. You idiots have made me like Stalin more (who I literally think is bad) because I realize now he was essentially right about social fascism.

—

I don't usually use forums or Reddit, I usually just post comments on Ancap blogs like Molyneux or Cantwell's blog, but they didn't seem appropriate places to post my story. So here goes, I just wanted to share this with all of you.

Nov 3 I flew to Europe for a Eurotrip type tour. Not a guide or packaged deal, just going around by myself. I paid for half of the trip with the wages I earned over the last two years, my dad paid for the other half. I am 19, I guess that is normal starting college and all. (Before that I worked for my dad's company part time, so I guess you could say he paid for all of it, lol).

I did France and then Italy and then Greece next. I am an Ancap so I wanted to see anarchists in these places. Yes, I know they are different kinds of "anarchists" and not really full anarchists like us. I went to an anarchist book store in Italy and it had a lot of English books, but no Rothbard or Ancap. Like I said, I expected that, not a surprise.

I went to Greece, which everyone knows is famous for its revolutionary anarchism, its economic crisis and everything going on right now. Here I found directions for a local anarchist center. I went and didn't see anybody, but it was covered in graffiti, mostly in Greek so I couldn't read it. Whatever, I started taking pictures. Then some people came out and confronted me.

This should have been my first warning sign something was not right, because photography is not a crime. They were not violent, but they were not friendly, like asking who I was, what I wanted. They all spoke good English actually. Not uncommon in Greece. I said I was a tourist and an anarchist and I just wanted to take pictures. Then they got friendly and told me I should have asked first (but pictures are no NAP violation so I don't know why, but I didn't say anything) and they invited me inside.

We hung out for a while and smoked hash (there is no good dank in Europe as you might find out like in Cali, everyone smokes hash with tobacco which isn't as cool as it sounds). We started talking about politics and anarchism. I was trying to talk about the state, they were like yeah no doubt the state was bad. But they wanted to talk about capitalism, capitalism this and that. This is when we started to get into a debate.

I told them that what they called capitalism is different from the free market. They said capitalism is free markets. And I said I agreed. That is what I am saying. Real capitalism is free markets. And they said yes, that is what we are trying to get rid of. And I said no, but we don't even have that right now. We need more free markets. And everyone at the same time was like "nooo" we are anarchists, we are against capitalism. Anarchists oppose capitalism.

And I said but not anarcho-capitalists. Anarcho-capitalists are the anarchists who support capitalism. I had a fanny pack (yeah, lame I know) for my camera and in that I had this yellow and black bowtie (also super lame, it was a joke but I wasnt wearing it). And I said look, these are the Ancap colors, yellow and black, like versus the communist red and black. Well, these guys had a lot of red and black in the building already so I thought they would get it.

I think that is when it started to get a really bad vibe, really tense in the air. The free market thing was funny, we disagreed but I think they thought I was just confused. Everyone was uncomfortable now. Then someone said markets wont work with democracy. And I said exactly, that's it, democracy is against anarchism. And they kind of agreed, and said yes, we don't have real democracy, just governments, and we needed more democracy. I said no, we need less democracy, democracy is the enemy. And we need to end democracy to have anarchy. Then they were all like "noooo" again. You know that thing people do in groups when everyone all says "nooo" or expresses some disapproval at the same time.

And one of them said "but we do want to stop democracy" and then they kind of spoke back and forth in Greek. I didn't really understand it. And they asked me what I meant.

So I said okay, I had the floor, I was going to tell them about ancapism. And I tried to explain to them some Rothbard and Hoppe. I said the natural order in anarchy is that the best rise to the top, the market picks who is the best. They compete and are peaceful. They said what do we want instead of anarchy. I said we want private owners to own their own land and businesses, and to employ people. They said that is what we have now. I said no, it would be even better. One of the guys said it was like feudalism. And I said it is not feudalism.

Eventually one of the guys spoke up and I thought he was Greek, but he spoke English perfectly so he may have not been. He said he knew what anarcho-capitalism was and that we were basically fascists. He asked me if I thought everything should be private. And I said yes. And he asked me if I thought people were unequal. And I told him yes. And that not everyone would have equal rights. I said everyone has the right to own property and not be done aggression against. But that not everyone had to be treated equally by the owners. He said what about immigrants and racism. And I said that would not happen in a free market, but yes property owners could be racist if they wanted to. They had to respect property.

Then he called me a fascist again, and someone else said I was a fascist. And then they basically all started shouting fascist at me, and one of them grabbed me by the wrists. They pulled me out the door, it was up three floors, and basically drug me down the stairs on my back. It hurt really bad and I remember yelling "you're breaking the NAP" and things like that. "Stop initiating force against me." Then they kicked me around on the ground in the hallway, before they took my camera and threw me outside. I was crying and stuff, I just sat there. I was in shock because it was so sudden. Looking back there were warning signs though.

I think they felt bad for me and gave the camera back, but when I looked later they stole the memory card with all of my Greek photos.

So they initiated force and theft. They broke the NAP. I knew the left anarchists were not real anarchists, but I never knew they would do something that bad.

I wasnt seriously hurt, just kicked around a little, lots of bruises and little cuts. I am fine guys so don't worry. Just needed to share.

—

EVERY MORNING I WAKE UP AND OPEN PALM SLAM A VHS INTO THE SLOT. ITS CHRONICLES OF RIDDICK AND RIGHT THEN AND THERE I START DOING THE MOVES ALONGSIDE WITH THE MAIN CHARACTER, RIDDICK. I DO EVERY MOVE AND I DO EVERY MOVE HARD. MAKIN WHOOSHING SOUNDS WHEN I SLAM DOWN SOME NECRO BASTARDS OR EVEN WHEN I MESS UP TECHNIQUE. NOT MANY CAN SAY THEY ESCAPED THE GALAXYS MOST DANGEROUS PRISON. I CAN. I SAY IT AND I SAY IT OUTLOUD EVERYDAY TO PEOPLE IN MY COLLEGE CLASS AND ALL THEY DO IS PROVE PEOPLE IN COLLEGE CLASS CAN STILL BE IMMATURE JEKRS. AND IVE LEARNED ALL THE LINES AND IVE LEARNED HOW TO MAKE MYSELF AND MY APARTMENT LESS LONELY BY SHOUTING EM ALL. 2 HOURS INCLUDING WIND DOWN EVERY MORNIng

—

Here's the problem we have: There are some people who demonstrate themselves to be incompatible with free society. They've shown that they are capable of inflicting traumatic, indescribable levels of pain on others.

The debt they take out against society through their crimes is something they simply cannot ever repay, either.

With people like this, rehabilitation isn't an option. When you have a person like, say, John Wayne Gacy...a person who has brutally murdered children for no greater purpose than self-satisfaction...even if you could rehabilitate the guy, the only way you could test your success would be to release him into a situation where he is able to murder more children. If he doesn't murder any, great! You rehabilitated him! If he does...well, the cost of your failure is one or more young boys being murdered in a most catastrophically torturous manner.

Simply put, the bet isn't worth the hand.

Our options are limited to two things, then: We can lock the people like this in a concrete box and wait for mother nature to do our dirty work, or we can go ahead and give them a quick and painless exit from a life they simply are not equipped to handle.

I don't want to torture people like Gacy. Forget what he "deserves", because they certainly don't deserve quick-and-painless given the amount of pain they've caused, but that's not something a dispassionate justice system can accomplish. Most people don't get what they deserve...for better or worse. His victims didn't get the death they deserved, and killers like him don't get the death they deserve either. But I still think it's irresponsible to bring bloodlust and vengeance into this, even if we are 100% sure of guilt.

I think the most practical solution here for all of society is to put people like this in a sealed chamber and fill it with an inert gas like argon or nitrogen and let them drift off into unconsciousness in peace.

In a system where guilt is assured, I'd take up a job as executioner of such people and I'd never lose a minute of sleep over it.

—

Lmao the irony. Your entire sub is based on the presumptuous assumption that your ideology is intellectually superior to whatever other ideologie(s) you oppose. Yet when someone comes to test you, and not even in a very serious way, you immediately get so threatened that you resort to... invoking dumb culture (“hahahaha ayyy someone pointed out an obvious cheap and lame caricature that I made so I’mma immediately [smash that ‘nerd’ button](https://imgur.com/hQaIMsE)”)? Come on, not even r/debatecommunism is as pathetic as this sub lol.

—

Am I seriously reading that people are saying that the testicles produce urine based on the questionable biological teachings?

Fuck right off.

The balls are too soft. I know this for a fucking fact. They're not going to store that piss, shoot it out and just regenerate that a few hours later. Kick fucking rocks, bud, if you think the balls could ever fucking contain that fucking golden fluid You've probably barely left the bedroom, never mind trying to study the goddamn motherfucking urinary tract. The bladder is a piss hardened mother fucking storage system from a long fucking line of evolution, and that poor bastard still gets full. The balls are not piss hardened mother fuckers. They are all as soft as butter in the back window of a car. Don't forget that.

People are actually legitimately dying because of the influence of people who think pee is stored in the balls. Like, actually being killed. Like your best friend in high school suddenly has their fly parted in front of you and now there's a golden shower all over your face for no fucking reason. They're being pissed on and people are arguing that pee is stored in the balls is revolutionary or some shit. Fuck you. I find that insulting.

This stupid pretentious argument demonstrates perfectly why I think the actual left has so little sway in our cultures.

Get your head out of the fucking memes and let life take that meme and beat the idealism out of you until it seeps from your balls and coagulates on the floor in the form of having a clue. Start solving real fucking problems. The extreme rate of bladder-related diseases caused by piss is a real fucking problem. A system of class oppression that is propped up by bigotry is a real problem. Predatory and corrupt financial systems is a real problem. The corporate take over of your government is a real problem. Neo Liberal puppets in office is a real problem.

Even these things, while important, are still not how you win any votes. Trump might be the king of fucking kidney stones outbreaks but he won that fucking campaign for a reason, and like so many people here have said, it's because his voter base is actually pissed off about valid things. I bet you money his average voters problems are something like this: "I need to pee." Start solving those things for people and you'll really be talking.

Stop with this shit that I need a dictionary and an open Wikipedia search to understand. We need to wrap our big dumb heads around the fact that if someone can't afford to go to the dentist and get a rotten tooth pulled then they probably don't give a fuck about spacey, frivolous academics. Arguing that the theoretic value of your political movement (which is never going to work anyways because you cant see the basic science behind fucking pee) is worth more than an attempt at changing laws to prevent bladder research makes you an asshole.

TL;DR Back up your shit talk and you won't be called a lefty piss bitch so often.

—

Orks have socialized everything. Socialized space flight. Socialized medium of exchange. Socialized krumping. Orkdom is a true meritocracy in the sense that Orks literally get bigger the longer they live and the more fighting they do, but all orks are equally entitled to fighting whenever they want to and the fighting is shared equally amongst all orks. Additionally, because Orks a genetically hardwired to follow the biggest, meanest, krumpinest ork (biotruufs) but Orks also maintain a powerful psychic gestalt they have essentially solved the problem of large scale, noncoercive hierarchical organizaton; The biggest, meanest, krumpinest orks are recognized to have authority on account of being the biggest, but collective decision making is truly democratic as each ork contributes to the psychic gestalt that is the true driver of ork collective decision making.

Orks extremely robust physiology makes medical care and even mechanical augmentation trivial, allowing for a devolved medical care infrastructure staffed by Orks who have an inclination towards exploring the wealth of medical knowledge encoded in their genetic structure. Likewise, orkish industry is devolved to a very low level, with individual mekboys able to trade on the orks encoded genetic technical knowledge to rapidly industrialize in any conditions imaginable.

Even the wealthiest orks, the so called "Flash Gitz" are limited in their accumulation of wealth by the essential nature of Orks. Orks use their own teef as a medium of exchange for the vast majority of common goods and needs. Orks can either harvest their own teef or punch them out of another orks, but accumulation is largely impossible because teef decay at a more or less fixed rate once separated from the ork, which keeps the orkish cash economy extremely liquid. Another factor preventing wealth accumulation is the nature of orkish hierarchies, orkish psychology, and the orkish psychic gestalt; most orkish infrastructure is constructed organically at a very devolved level. An enthusiastic mekboy's enthusiasm is literally infectious, inspiring other orks to develop their latent mekboy talents and join the construction project, which in turn motivates more orks to participate. In this way orkish industry is built from the bottom up, as individual mekboys inspire infrastructure build up informed by the needs of the waagh as determined either by Orkish leadership or hte collective will of the orkish psychic gestalt.

Extremely large capital projects like fortresses, kroozas, rocks, stompas, and planetary class weapons are financed not with teef or other mediums of exchange, but rather arise out of the collective enthusiasm of the waagh for really big weapons. Far from being alienated from their labor individual orks will happily and enthusiastically leap in to the construction of large orkish capital projects, deriving satisfaction and a sense of place and meaning from the knowledge that their efforts are directly contributing to the Waaaghs ultimate goal of getting in to a bloody good scrap.

The paradoxically hierarchical yet devolved nature of orkish leadership cannot be overstated. The biggest ork in the Waagh enjoys the near absolute loyalty of the Waagh, but only as long as the Waagh continues to progress, grow, and find new battles to fight. If a leader founders, becomes unpopular, or simply fails to prosecute the Waagh this will quickly become evident to the Waagh as a whole, with the ambivalence of each Ork towards their leadership influencing the Orkish psychic Gestalt and encouraging subordinate orks to krump extra hard so they can become big enough to challenge the leadership for supreme command of the Waagh. Thus an unpopular leader rarely lasts long. A crisis of leadership will rapidly precipitate a series of coups until a leader emerges who is recognized as the biggest and meanest and krumpinest, at which point all Orks in the Waagh will recognize the leader and resume their individual efforts towards the Waagh. In this way the Waagh maintains rigid hierarchy that is nonetheless serving at the will of the collective body.

In short Orks is Green, Green is best, and you should all be out Krumpin instead of writing nonesense on the interwebs.

—

My life is doing great! I have no worries at all. You guys told me it was my white privilege. I had to work hard and attend school and not do drugs. Wow I’m a productive member of society and just want to do what my grandparents did. Have a family, grow a garden. Make big dinners and grind meat in the garage. Unfortunately only one side wants me to do those things and the other side says I should be ashamed of something I have no control over. The color of my skin.

I suppose this is where I’m supposed to say you’re a thirty year old living in your parents basement rent free with a liberal arts degree? I’m above making insults to strangers. If you wanna put your head in the sand and not accept reality. Elites will always be in control. Always have. Fortunate son is a great song

—

I have had it up to fucking here with fucking economists! None of your fucking ideas work, you don't know why, you can't explain why, and you can't. Get. Shit. Done. You read one fucking book that some fucking German wrote during the CIVIL FUCKING WAR and think it's the end of fucking knowledge. Well I spent thirteen fucking years studying Anthropology and I've got this to say; Marx is incomplete, dangerously reductive, limited by his cultural and historical perspective, and stymied by his focus on economics to the exclusion of other factors. And all you fuckers who spout off about being materialists while treating the work of one old dead German like he was fucking Jibral dictating poetry to you in a Cave need to fucking step off and read a goddamn sociology book. Rant off. Don't fucking DM me.

—

One lesson to be drawn from recent Western history might be this: Sometimes the extremists and radicals and weirdos see the world more clearly than the respectable and moderate and sane. All kinds of phenomena, starting as far back as the Iraq War and the crisis of the euro but accelerating in the age of populism, have made more sense in the light of analysis by reactionaries and radicals than as portrayed in the organs of establishment opinion.

This is part of why there’s been so much recent agitation over universities and op-ed pages and other forums for debate. There’s a general understanding that the ideological mainstream isn’t adequate to the moment, but nobody can decide whether that means we need purges or pluralism, a spirit of curiosity and conversation or a furious war against whichever side you think is evil.

For those more curious than martial, one useful path through this thicket is to look at areas where extremists and eccentrics from very different worlds are talking about the same subject. Such overlap is no guarantee of wisdom, but it’s often a sign that there’s something interesting going on.

Which brings me to the sex robots.

Well, actually, first it brings me to the case of Robin Hanson, a George Mason economist, libertarian and noted brilliant weirdo. Commenting on the recent terrorist violence in Toronto, in which a self-identified “incel” — that is, involuntary celibate — man sought retribution against women and society for denying him the fornication he felt that he deserved, Hanson offered this provocation: If we are concerned about the just distribution of property and money, why do we assume that the desire for some sort of sexual redistribution is inherently ridiculous?

After all, he wrote, “one might plausibly argue that those with much less access to sex suffer to a similar degree as those with low income, and might similarly hope to gain from organizing around this identity, to lobby for redistribution along this axis and to at least implicitly threaten violence if their demands are not met.”

This argument was not well received by people closer to the mainstream than Professor Hanson, to put it mildly. A representative response from Slate’s Jordan Weissmann, “Is Robin Hanson the Creepiest Economist in America?”, cited the post along with some previous creepy forays to dismiss Hanson as a misogynist weirdo not that far removed from the franker misogyny of toxic online males.

But Hanson’s post made me immediately think of a recent essay in The London Review of Books by Amia Srinivasan, “Does Anyone Have the Right To Sex?” Srinivasan, an Oxford philosophy professor, covered similar ground (starting with an earlier “incel” killer) but expanded the argument well beyond the realm of male chauvinists to consider groups with whom The London Review’s left-leaning and feminist readers would have more natural sympathy — the overweight and disabled, minority groups treated as unattractive by the majority, trans women unable to find partners and other victims, in her narrative, of a society that still makes us prisoners of patriarchal and also racist-sexist-homophobic rules of sexual desire.

Srinivasan ultimately answered her title question in the negative: “There is no entitlement to sex, and everyone is entitled to want what they want.” But her negative answer was a qualified one. While “no one has a right to be desired,” at the same time “who is desired and who isn’t is a political question,” which left-wing and feminist politics might help society answer differently someday. This wouldn’t instantiate a formal right to sex, exactly, but if the new order worked as its revolutionary architects intended, sex would be more justly distributed than it is today.

A number of the critics I saw engaging with Srinivasan’s essay tended to respond the way a normal center-left writer like Weissmann engaged with Hanson’s thought experiment — by commenting on its weirdness or ideological extremity rather than engaging fully with its substance. But to me, reading Hanson and Srinivasan together offers a good case study in how intellectual eccentrics — like socialists and populists in politics — can surface issues and problems that lurk beneath the surface of more mainstream debates.

By this I mean that as offensive or utopian the redistribution of sex might sound, the idea is entirely responsive to the logic of late-modern sexual life, and its pursuit would be entirely characteristic of a recurring pattern in liberal societies.

First, because like other forms of neoliberal deregulation the sexual revolution created new winners and losers, new hierarchies to replace the old ones, privileging the beautiful and rich and socially adept in new ways and relegating others to new forms of loneliness and frustration.

Second, because in this new landscape, and amid other economic and technological transformations, the sexes seem to be struggling generally to relate to one another, with social and political chasms opening between them and not only marriage and family but also sexual activity itself in recent decline.

Third, because the culture’s dominant message about sex is still essentially Hefnerian, despite certain revisions attempted by feminists since the heyday of the Playboy philosophy — a message that frequency and variety in sexual experience is as close to a summum bonum as the human condition has to offer, that the greatest possible diversity in sexual desires and tastes and identities should be not only accepted but cultivated, and that virginity and celibacy are at best strange and at worst pitiable states. And this master narrative, inevitably, makes both the new inequalities and the decline of actual relationships that much more difficult to bear …

… which in turn encourages people, as ever under modernity, to place their hope for escape from the costs of one revolution in a further one yet to come, be it political, social or technological, which will supply if not the promised utopia at least some form of redress for the many people that progress has obviously left behind.

There is an alternative, conservative response, of course — namely, that our widespread isolation and unhappiness and sterility might be dealt with by reviving or adapting older ideas about the virtues of monogamy and chastity and permanence and the special respect owed to the celibate.

But this is not the natural response for a society like ours. Instead we tend to look for fixes that seem to build on previous revolutions, rather than reverse them.

In the case of sexual liberation and its discontents, that’s unlikely to mean the kind of thoroughgoingly utopian reimagining of sexual desire that writers like Srinivasan think we should aspire toward, or anything quite so formal as the pro-redistribution political lobby of Hanson’s thought experiment.

But I expect the logic of commerce and technology will be consciously harnessed, as already in pornography, to address the unhappiness of incels, be they angry and dangerous or simply depressed and despairing. The left’s increasing zeal to transform prostitution into legalized and regulated “sex work” will have this end implicitly in mind, the libertarian (and general male) fascination with virtual-reality porn and sex robots will increase as those technologies improve — and at a certain point, without anyone formally debating the idea of a right to sex, right-thinking people will simply come to agree that some such right exists, and that it makes sense to look to some combination of changed laws, new technologies and evolved mores to fulfill it.

Whether sex workers and sex robots can actually deliver real fulfillment is another matter. But that they will eventually be asked to do it, in service to a redistributive goal that for now still seems creepy or misogynist or radical, feels pretty much inevitable.

—

The question is this: Does anybody else believe that we are at the point where civil war (or mass infighting between nations) in the West is inevitable? I pray to God I’m wrong on this so if you guys could generate any alternative conclusions (or find flaws in my reasoning) it’d be much appreciated as it’s one major worry that I wouldn’t have to think about anymore. (Forgive my laziness as I’m a slow typer and I could spend another hour reworking this into an interrogative format, but I feel it’s well enough articulated to get the point across) The following is my most recent mini-essay (I can’t quite think of the right word at this time) which I feel lays out most of my case (if for whatever reason you guys want to see more of my ramblings I’ll see if I can dig some more up and if you’re really interested I am currently in the process of writing a full-fledged essay, but it could be weeks before it’s anywhere near ready): God help us. The left is playing a dangerous game. They’re pressing a stress point on the gender and sex issues. It’s a core aspect that human societies depend on and they are risking a multiple fracture in pressing these different issues simultaneously and forcefully. I’d like to at least graduate college before the seemingly inevitable upcoming societal unraveling that’s going to take place here soon. I don’t even think that they realize the kind of fire they’re playing with. There’s undoubtedly been a rise in authoritarian, collectivist ideologies in the past four years and it is NOT GOOD! Both sides continually provoke the other in a sort of ideological arms race which has already resulted in many deaths and injuries. I’m worried that Trump may turn out to be the biggest political Pyrrhic victory in modern politics as he is a seemingly never ending source of fuel for the left wing propaganda machine that the media has become. I was born in 2000 and only truly begin remembering the beginning of Obama’s first term, but what I will say is this: from what I’ve been able to gather in the past 3-4 years I’ve reached the conclusion that the world we’ve inherited is a Cold-War-esque apocalypse waiting to happen in its own weird way. The United States seemingly hasn’t a damned clue as to what the hell it can do as the sole global superpower other than preoccupy itself with small-fry foreign civil wars to try and prop up some new allies until another USSR-type opponent (my bet is one of these three possible scenarios with somewhat gimmicky yet equally self-explanatory names: “China Rising,” “Russia Reborn,” and “War on the Western Front” [the final being a repeat of the kind of European infighting seen in the first half of the previous century]) comes along. Jordan Peterson has often pointed out that the extreme mastery of the material realm seen in the past 600 years has come at the loss/forgetting of the moral/spiritual/psychological gold mine which Judeo-Christian values can provide us with and that this will eventually (very soon) come back to bite us. We’re too powerful to play the game of war any longer. We must strike a balance once and for all (or at least long enough to buy us time to look into what makes us tick (“know thyself”) so we can come up with some sort of solution). The West represents the best hope for humanity yet and it cannot fail. The last time it fell apart it took over 1500 years before things actually calmed down to a reasonable (if somewhat forced) level. Imagine how much longer that’ll be with thermonuclear weapons thrown into the mix. Not fun! Humanity as a whole has too much to lose. We need to stop this madness on the left and right before it’s too late.

—

Was sitting around in the baggage claim, witnessing what decades ago was a luxurious and latently aristocratic travel industry become over-democratized and degenerated.

Saw the dregs of humanity pass by. It just seems to get worse every year. Normal people no longer exist.

A man with long hair, a big nose and a skirt with hormone-enhanced breasts meets his female friends who do their best to endear him by complimenting his offputting appearance.

Another long haired bugman with a beard in his mid to late 20s with his girlfriend both carrying large pokemon plushies like toddlers.

Tattooed dykes with short cropped and partially shaven heads roving around in groups like a band of marauders from a Mad Max film.

An overwesternized and aposematized Asian thot with blue hair and tattoos waits for her obviously umpteenth caucasian boyfriend.

Certain themes seem to predominate among the others: obesity, self-disfigurement, complete erasure of the polarity of the sexes- all in various shades and forms.

I saw two decent-looking caucasian males in dress shirts and slacks engaged in agreeable conversation. Had I been an older gentleman of means, I would have given them some money and shook their hands, thanking them and apologizing on behalf of the society they have to live in.

Spent the next day at the botanical garden, watching hundreds of bumble bees furiously collecting pollen. It was the only thing that still seemed to make any sense.

—

Don’t worry, this time I will be much shorter than the last time. I will explain my positions regarding moral issues that are quite… controversial. And I am sure that some people will refuse to even read this to the end. But I still think my position has to be affirmed and I will refer to this essay if anyone is confused about my views.

First of all, we have to talk about why we care (or don’t care) about certain moral issues. I care about sentient beings. If a moral action affects not a single sentient being – something I am skeptical of, since we live in a closely connected universe – the moral action isn’t even a moral action to begin with; it’s an action just like any other physical event in the universe, such as rain or the moment a supernova occurs. Do you have moral concerns about a distant celestial object exploding?

Anyway, this should clarify my position on necrophilia. Do I personally think it is disgusting? Yes. But many of the mistakes people make when talking about moral concerns is that they inject personal preferences regarding these subjects. There are things I judge disgusting – in the sense that I feel biologically nauseated by them – such as this (if you have a weak stomach in general, do not click on this link).

Do I think this is immoral? Aside from wasting food and resources that could be used for better means, the act of eating this – in my opinion, frankly disgusting – mixture of stuff is not immoral. It’s just disgusting. My whole point is that what we judge disgusting or not only applies to us personally; it shouldn’t be server as guidance to judge the moral actions of others. You think anal sex is disgusting? Don’t do it then, personally. But you shouldn’t use this to impose societal rules on others that might not share this personal preference. It is okay to have personal preferences, we all have them, more or less.

Now, what people were waiting for: what I think of necrophilia. Above, I said that I only care about sentient beings. This means that corpses – which are by definition dead and therefore ceased to be sentient – are not objects of my moral concern. My personal stance about my corpse is that I genuinely don’t care what they do with it, whether they bury it underground, burn it or molest it to generate sexual pleasure. I couldn’t care less. I will be dead by then, my consciousness won’t exist anymore. It is the moral equivalent of masturbating on a sunflower – don’t ask me what I envision by that.

I do think that rape and sexual abuse are highly important subjects to talk about and that we should always have empathy for victims of these crimes against someones autonomy. But this isn’t the case with corpses. In my opinion, we should treat corpses as objects that could be inherited by relatives and friends. If someone ejaculated on my laptop I wouldn’t be angry because I thought the laptop is sentient and therefore someone has violated it’s honor, but because I own the laptop and I don’t want semen stains on it.

Therefore, we shouldn’t treat necrophilia as a crime or even an immoral act in this instance, but as a pure violation of someones personal property. Now, I haven’t thought deeply about what type of legislation I would ideally apply, especially considering the legal loopholes that someone could abuse for the most sinister reasons. But necrophilia in itself can’t be the problem. My personal disgust for it – and the fact that it might not be hygienic to sexually interact with a corpse – shouldn’t serve to morally condemn someone that does enjoy this.

Now, let’s move on sentient beings, which I do think matter in terms of moral judgement. First and foremost, we have to establish that individual adults that are capable of consenting should be able to do whatever they want in their privacy when it comes to sex. Of course, exceptions to this rule might exist, such as someone having a sexual fetish for cutting limbs off or other questions we might have about someones physical and mental health. But in general, in a modern and liberal society, we should give consenting adults the right to perform whatever sexual act they want, whether individually, in couples or even groups. If you disagree with this premise, everything below won’t make sense to you and the conversation shifted about what consent is or not. Not incest in itself.

The first time I have interested myself for the subject of incest (I mean, morally; I myself have no sexual interest in it) was watching a video of popular science publisher and cosmologist Lawrence Krauss, which you can access here. It was a provocative moment, since I have never really thought about the subject and always considered it immoral by default. But it did plant the seed of doubt in me, which, to be quite honest, wasn’t difficult since I have never really cared about it. Many of our principles are just deeply planted in ourselves by our social environment, and they are worth being challenged. I would recommend reading Tauriq Moosa’s “Is Incest Wrong?“, which brilliantly summarizes many of my points as well.

Anyhow, some of the counter-arguments – or better, attempts at countering the conception that incest is not immoral – is to say it is disgusting. Now, at this point I am pretty sure that the reader understands that personal preferences shouldn’t be used as moral guidance. So we can discard that. Another criticism is that incest generates birth defects and therefore is negatively affecting a person that has not consented to this (it is contentious that anyone consented to being born). I would actually agree to this, but with the detail that I would differentiate incest from inbreeding. Inbreeding is when incest happens but someone got pregnant. I think inbreeding is immoral, since it has a high chance of creating birth defects that can be very debilitating in terms of life quality of a person that has not consented to this.

My point is that incest and inbreeding are morally very different. Incest, as the pure act of affection (it also could be sex just for the act of pleasure and not love in the proper sense, but I hope you know what I mean) between individuals that are genetically rather closely related and does not produce any consequences to anyone else is perfectly fine. It should be judged just like any other relationship and condemnation of that is what I would consider rather immoral. If you don’t like incest and you feel repulsion by it: nobody is forcing you to anything. Or, well, nobody should force you to that. So I do obviously condemn the forced marriages around the world that implicate siblings and the sexual abuse that some parents inflict on their children. But as long as there is an even playing field when it comes to consent, incest is fine.

As a side note, my opposition to inbreeding is rather complicated. It invokes questions about who is allowed to reproduce; and this conversation has deep consequences. I think morally, you shouldn’t inbreed. Even though it isn’t certain, it will likely cause tremendous suffering to someone else. But we absolutely should talk about the subject of breeding rights – with intellectual honesty and empathy for those affected, of course.

By far, I think the use of the naturalistic fallacy to justify any opposition to incest is hilarious. Humans and animals evolved mechanisms that prevent incest – ultimately, inbreeding – and therefore it must be wrong, because it isn’t natural. If you are familiar with fallacies, this is a classic one. The morality of an action is totally divorced from what we consider natural or not. The concept of “natural” is, to a materialist like me, very questionable in itself, let alone what it means morally.

The last opposition to incest that I want to address is that having affections for people that are close to you genetically is either a mental illness in itself or causes one. This is a claim I have seen no substance to it – why would we consider that a mental illness? The problem in bioethics as to what we consider an illness or not is a gigantic rabbit hole. It might be so deep, we metaphorically could reach the core of the Earth and come out on the other side. Simply put, I see no reason to label this affection an illness. Just because it isn’t statistically common – at least nowadays – shouldn’t be criteria for such. Otherwise, we might return to the middle age when being left-handed was an illness (or, in that time, a sin).

Perhaps the only evidence that I received about incest causing mental distress or illness was by a study that evaluated the consequences of non-consensual incest – or simply, rape. Yes, I am aware that rape causes trauma. This isn’t disputed, not even close. I oppose rape and condemn it thoroughly. But I haven’t seen any study about the effects of incest that involves consenting actors. I won’t bother linking the article I mentioned above since it has no relevance to the conversation, because I assume by default that rape is wrong.

Since this a controversial topic, I hope you have made it to the end without feeling any nausea. I do think we need to talk more about subjects that invoke disgust in common people, with reason and actual arguments.

—

Who knew that 'israel' was not a western creation? According to kahina the Zionist entity is in fact an organic expression of indigenous peoples, not western-European colonists. Oh and saying 'yank' is apparently anti-Semitic now too. Deranged doesn't quite cut it.

If anyone asks kahina to show one example of me allegedly "using classic British contemptuous dogwhistles about Greeks" they will be disappointed, as no such thing exists, the allegation is a foil to allow kahina herself to deploy the 'oily Levantine' trope: inversed Zizekianism.

—

Has it not occurred to you that the voice you've read my post in is in fact the voice in your head? It's your voice, it bears your tone, and your judgement values. How about this: Why are you being a little bitch? I am the matriarch of redditarian gang banging, dear. Do you not know who I am? I am desperately lonely. Are you trying to be my friend? Because you've got an interesting way of going about it. I'm ok with this, I can work with this, this is what we do. I do this. (That's an ICP reference. Get it?) Or am I wrong? Are you hurt or offended by something I said? Have I wronged you somehow? Are you upset? Do you feel trolled? As your friend, I feel obliged to inform you that if you said "yes" to any of these questions, you might be misattributing things to me which do not exist. If you don't understand what that means, how about don't sit there and tell me I'm both somehow subjective and also wrong. You can't have it both ways. So what's it going to be, chummer? I am The House. And The House says the door is open. Are you going to walk in here, fuck my shit up, and steal my properties? Ok, that's rude. We could also just chill. If I think I'm someone who thinks they're deeper than they actually are, then clearly I must dig deeper. I died once, true story. Listen... everything I've said in this thread... you must read in a voice with a friendly tone. And before you interrupted me, a youthful jubilence. You're abrasive, I'm sure you already know that. I understand I can be abrasive as well. I can understand you, I need you to understand me. If you don't understand me, we can't be friends. If we can't be friends, then you best get to stepping because you're in my way. Are you good?

—

take to respectfully ask for the whole subreddit to be taken down, but I know neither things are going to happen. I'm sure many of you still have the attitude that this kind of thing is merely a fun thought experiment, a bit of debate, maybe even a source of entertainment. However, it is far from any of those things.

In the 21st century, ideas have a lot more power than ever due to the presence of technology. They have the power to sway public opinion much more effectively, and such tools are way more accessible. You may find it melodramatic, but posts like these are nothing short of what I'd consider psychotronic warfare. I take this very seriously, many of us do.

When you try to twist our words and broadcast such libel, you are hurting the working class because you are committing an act of psychological warfare against the Revolution. I take it very seriously, and this will not be forgotten. Trust me, we keep tabs on frequent fliers like you, /u/Propertar who have a record for going into our safe 