Former Minneapolis Muslim police officer Mohamed Noor, “found guilty of murdering Australian life coach Justine Ruszczyk Damond claims he should be acquitted because he did not act “with a depraved heart” when he shot her dead.”

Noor appears to be acting with a “depraved heart” now. He has shown no remorse for murdering Damond and prosecutors already established that he “knew exactly what he was doing” and had “intent to kill”.

Robert Spencer previously noted about Noor:

His competence as a police officer was always secondary to his ethnicity and religion. Thus he remained on the force even though there were three complaints against him in two years. A neighbor reported: “He is extremely nervous … he is a little jumpy … he doesn’t really respect women, the least thing you say to him can set him off.” When the neighbor heard that Noor was the cop who had shot an unarmed woman, he wasn’t surprised: “When they say a policeman shot an Australian lady I thought uh oh, but then when they said who it was, I was like, ‘OK.’”

Minneapolis Mayor Betsy Hodges, despite Noor shooting an unarmed woman, pulled the “Islamophobia” canard….

Mayor Hodges is reassuring Muslims and warning against “Islamophobia,” as if a non-Muslim police officer had shot an unarmed Muslim woman. But that’s not what happened. And in issuing this warning, Hodges is only reinforcing the false premises that led to the killing of Justine Damond in the first place: the idea that Muslims are a victimized, persecuted community that needs special consideration, such that an incompetent Muslim police officer had to be hired. This just ensures that in the future, there will be more Justine Damonds.

Entitlement is a feature with Islamic supremacists, and so, the brazenness of Noor in seeking to overturn his guilty verdict is nothing brow-raising.

“Mohamed Noor seeks to overturn guilty verdict over Australian Justine Damond’s killing”, The Guardian, May 14, 2019: