2% weight

My elevator pitch for this ICO would be "Gamified microtask system that turns everyone on the planet into an agent to protect your intellectual property rights".



In as much as you believe intellectual property rights should exist, or are not a criminal attempting to ignore them for a living... then I think most people would believe the idea of Stop The Fakes is a good thing.



I'd give the vision 5 points if it didn't have potential scaling issues mostly due to it's centralization and creation of a closed system. Those I think may limit its growth potential and open the door for competitors to build a better and more successful system. In as much as they can evolve as they get users and try to grow they may be able to exploit first mover advantage here - really the winner will be the one that gets most customers and doers using the system.



There is also very little original tech here - it's a synthesis of existing things it just pulls them together in a convenient way tailored for a specific vertical - IP infraction detection and correction (maybe). Some of these things are already present in other dApps eg. microtask and piecemeal work marketplaces (e.g. STORM), copyright registration (e.g. Binded and Ascribe). The element I see as unique (so far) is using geo-tracking of infraction reports and big-data/machine-learning (AI) to detect trends and clustering of events. That could really help IP owners and be a strong value add.



In general I think it is frustrating that so many dApps are showing up that are re-inventing instead of reusing tech. That's because it is pretty hard and risky to integrate with other dApps. Ideas like District0x are hoping to solve that so apps with similar needs can collaborate and share functionality and data - well that's the hope.



If I was building this from scratch I'd look to divide into services where I could plug in existing blockchain services instead of building from scratch:



1. Identity system for doers (eg. Blockpass or Civic)

2. Microtasking marketplace (possibly Storm or something like it)

3. Copyright / IP registration

4. Analyze and filter doers submissions without human touch

5. Dispute arbitration (Sage?)

6. Suggest possible requests for IP owners

7. Enforcing violations detected



All these except perhaps the microtasking should be pluggable so that a given requestor can define how their requests and doers submissions are processed, checked and arbitrated.



By making 6 and 7 pluggable that would allow someone with no knowledge of this space to have others do all the work of driving STF for them. They could just upload an image and allow any third party to then create requests on their behalf to protect it, and any third party to then enforce compliance for them perhaps sharing any bounty with those parties - and the doer. These are things missing from STF and if added make it a lot easier to use and more scalable. As would making 4 and 5 able to use 3rd party services.



Imagine for a minute on of the worlds biggest industries and heaviest users of the Internet - adult entertainment (aka porn) using this service. The kind of filtering of doers submissions would be pretty unique - eliminating porn in users submissions would just not work, you need industry specific filtering. Ideally an adult video company would want to provide access to a canonical version of their product, or extracts of it, then have requests of a form appropriate for their industry automatically generated, subsets of doers made eligible (those legally allowed to and willing to access and search adult sites) and then perhaps experts in DMCA infringement enforcement dolling out the disputes and take down notices, perhaps collecting penalties as necessary.



Bigger companies and brands would probably not do that - they have their own in house people, but for everyone else it opens the market to even more people who are IP enforcement experts to use the platform.



Problems I see would be for doers either being overwhelmed with the variety of requests, requestors not being good at creating effective requests that doers can use - causing lots of human touch to validate and arbitrate submissions, or just a lack of submissions and quality requests. At that point you may need something like a BPO to manage teams of trained doers, or at least to recruit and train them. (That could be another service in the platform - recruiting and training doers either in a general or IP specific way). I guess only time will tell how well this works IRL.



As for the team of STF - well I think they have a bunch of people with very relevant experience in the problem domain. I can't say how good the single tech guy is or if they can execute. But in general I feel like they are above average.



The investment potential is driven in the short term by the hefty 40% day-1 pre-ICO bonus which has potential for a quick turnaround if you aren't interested in the long term. That's not so great for the participants in the public-IOC phase who get a maximum of 15% bonus.



Beyond the ICO we may see some pops as the product rolls out and hopefully gains adoption. Beyond that the only mechanism for appreciation in STF value is supply and demand for STF tokens. The more requestors there are buying STF tokens to pay doers the more demand there is and the higher the price is. Initial ICO valuation is 1 STF = $0.45 (without bonus) and the floor for doer payment is around $5 for the simplest task. That is also a problem because in some parts of the world $5 is 5 days pay and others it is the price of a coffee at Starbucks. Allowing regional pricing may be a feature they need to think about for the future. It seems like they will need a very large amount of volume to move the pricing up significantly. And if there was a lot of volatility they may need to deal with pricing rewards in local fiat not STF - or use a reserve to stabilize it for the duration of requests, or use an internal pegged coin not tradable outside of STF.



They have a demo of the UI accessible from the website that gives an idea of how it will look but it is certainly not the real thing. Some of the prior concerns I mentioned definitely apply - like discovery of appropriate requests by doers since any reasonably successful system will quickly have thousands if not millions of requests leading to a significant headache for all concerned. Matching requestors to doers will be an art in and off itself. But I give them an above average 4 because they have at least a UI demo and the alpha product should be available in Feb which is before the public ICO begins.



A thing noticeably missing from their website is any indication of content companies that are wanting to use it. I would hope at this stage the could have had some early partners especially in the aforementioned adult entertainment business, or physical product manufacturers such as fashion and cosmetics. That would give some real validation that they are creating a product that IP owners will want to use.



Note US Citizens and residents are not allowed to participate in the ICO for STF.





+5 Agree +5

+5