In another thread said that the possibility that the Polaris 10 that run the bench is a cutdown version and the full die will have 2560 cores. As it seems that is very likely, let's take that number.<br>

2560 with the power of 4096 cores takes that each core has to be 60% better to equal the 4096 version. Didn't Nvidia bring GTX970 with 1664 cores equalising the 780Ti with 2880 cores?<br>

If Nvidia can make a 73% more power from their cores, doen't AMD do a 60% improvement? I think so<br><br>

Also, the gmc in the table with the differents iterations of GCN that is posted earlier, has to be the memory controller (graphics memory controller?) So 8.1 is a improvement over the 8.0 but it's not the 8.5 that Fiji has. So no HBM this time. I remember Mahigan saying that Polaris 10 will have HBM, so maybe it's false.<br><br>

Another thing is that maybe is a very weak bandwith for a 390-390X replacement. I don't know, but seems too low. 6Ghz is very conservative. Let's hope some 8Ghz in the final version.<br><br>

There are a lot versions of the Polaris 11 silicon let's take that as laptop versions and 2 desktop versions (380 and 370 replacement). It seems that from the bottom to the top (150-500), we are getting Polaris and 14n love. Also, 800Mhz...let's hope another 7970 case. 1200Mhz check in, 1100Mhz dayly. It seems that we are using some dense libraries again...<br><br>

So Polaris 10 is at FuryX like GTX970 to 780Ti. I'm in, boy. <img alt="rolleyes.gif" class="bbcode_smiley" src="http://files.overclock.net/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif">