by Ruby Henley

There have been rumors swirling around the Internet that the United Nations’ Peacekeepers are invading the US through Chicago. I can say as of today, December 29, 2017, I believe it to be true for more than rumor’s sake. There is evidence Chicago has been prepping for this takeover through the Model UN Development Organization (MUNDO).

The Chicago International Model United Nations (CIMUN) conference is an annual four-day event for high school Model United Nations students. It is held at the Hilton Chicago hotel in downtown Chicago, Illinois in December. It is currently on its eleventh installment. This has been developing for a very long period of time.

CIMUN began in 2004 as a project of the Model United Nations Development Organization (MUNDO). In its first year, the conference was attended by approximately 150 student delegates. Over the years it continued to grow, with the number of registered delegates increasing by an average of twenty percent annually. The conference attracted over 1300 student delegates in Dec 2015.

The thirtieth annual conference of the Model United Nations of the University of Chicago will be held on February 1–4, 2018 at the Palmer House Hilton in the heart of downtown Chicago. Over 2,600 high-school students will assume the roles of ambassadors and diplomats and converge for a weekend of discussion, alongside our 220 University of Chicago undergraduate members.

It sounds all well and good, but ask yourself why the United Nations chose Chicago to establish as the headquarters for MUNDO? It is nothing more than an excuse to have feet on the ground here in the United States. Of course, do not forget the brainwashing of the youth of the world.

www.modelun.net/



You can read more at the site, but I feel from going over the information Chicago has been chosen as the center of entry for the United Nations. I think it is time to accept the fact we are being invaded, and we also have the signing of the Executive order of July 2016 by Obama. This has all been planned for some time. The Executive Order can be read at – obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2016/07/01/executive-order-united-states-policy-pre-and-post-strike-measures



The United States announced its support for a set of principles that give a green light for U.N. peacekeeping troops and police to use force to protect civilians in armed conflicts. It is so amazing how they manage to make it sound like this is designed to protect “civilians” or “we the people” when it is exactly the opposite.

U.S. Ambassador Samantha Power (remember her?) told a high-level U.N. meeting, speaking on the responsibility to protect civilians that the United States was “proud” and “humbled” to join 28 other countries that have pledged to abide by the 18 pledges. U.N. peacekeepers from these 29 countries are now required to act in cases where civilians are in danger. Enter Cook County Commissioner Richard Boykin, who is suggesting that the United Nations send in peacekeepers to deal with the gun violence.

“I’m hoping to appeal to the U.N. to actually come to Chicago and meet with victims of violence, and maybe even possibly help out in terms of peacekeeping efforts,” Boykin said, “because I think it’s so critical for us to make sure that these neighborhoods are safe.”

I want to intervene here and say I will not call these UN troops “peacekeepers,” as I think it is more accurate to call them “rapists.” I just watched a video of women coming forward in Haiti with small children conceived through rape by UN “peacekeepers.” It is now apparent these rapists are above the law. They go in and do as they please.



President Trump just made a bold move in cutting the budget for the United Nations. When the Trump Administration went forward with budget cuts at the United Nations, some critics of the organization saw it as a responsible oversight of taxpayer money. And, of course, it was. But I, also, see it as Trump standing up against the United Nations.

The U.S. mission to the United Nations hailed the operating budget of $5.396 billion for 2018 and 2019, slightly less than the $5.4 billion requested by Secretary General António Guterres. In a statement, the mission said the United States had negotiated $285 million in cost savings as well as reducing “bloated” management and support functions.

“We will no longer let the generosity of the American people be taken advantage of or remain unchecked,” said U.S. Ambassador Nikki Haley, calling the cost-cutting historic and promising more to come.

Using a calculation based on the size of its economy, the United States pays 22 percent of the U.N.’s operating budget, and 28 percent of its peacekeeping operations. That makes it the largest contributor among member nations, followed by Japan, China, Germany, France and Britain.

President Trump must have many enemies at the United Nations, but as we know Obama basically sold the United States out to them. I don’t think Trump can undo the damage Obama has done.

Then we have this report, and I believe it is true. On September 4, 2017, more than three months before Commissioner Boykin’s interview with CBS Chicago, Alistair Williams of Stock Board Asset put a video on YouTube taken by a drone of “a convoy of UN armored vehicles” at “an undisclosed location” in Hagerstown, MD. What legitimate reason would there be for United Nations vehicles to be in Maryland or anywhere in the United States?



www.intellihub.com/heavily-armored-company-of-u-n-vehicles-and-equipment-staged-behind-maryland-warehouse-and-are-ready-for-rapid-domestic-deployment/

“HAGERSTOWN (INTELLIHUB) — Over 50 heavily armored United Nations vehicles and various pieces of equipment (generators, etc.) sufficient enough to support a small company of ‘peacekeeper’ troops are sitting on the deck behind a U.S. government-owned warehouse and appear to be ready for some type of rapid domestic deployment. The vehicles are parked in the rear parking lot of a warehouse building located at 11841 New Gate Blvd. They are all painted white and bear the letters “U.N.”

“As I reported on Sunday, the Cook County Commissioner (Chicago) recently met with the U.N. undersecretary in an effort to get U.N. troops deployed onto the streets domestically to quell the recent spike in violence but some, like myself, wonder if this all isn’t some type of plan concocted by Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel or former President Barack Obama who have strong ties to the city and have already pushed agendas that will allow the deployment of U.N. troops on U.S. soil which ultimately would sidestep Posse comitatus.”

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act

“The Posse Comitatus Act is a United States federal law (18 U.S.C. § 1385, original at 20 Stat. 152) signed on June 18, 1878 by President Rutherford B. Hayes. The purpose of the act – in concert with the Insurrection Act of 1807 – is to limit the powers of the federal government in using federal military personnel to enforce domestic policies within the United States. It was passed as an amendment to an army appropriation bill following the end of Reconstruction, and was subsequently updated in 1956 and 1981.

The Act only specifically applies to the United States Army and, as amended in 1956, the United States Air Force. While the Act does not explicitly mention the United States Navy and the United States Marine Corps, the Department of the Navy has prescribed regulations that are generally construed to give the Act force with respect to those services as well. The Act does not apply to the Army National Guard and the Air National Guard under state authority from acting in a law enforcement capacity within its home state or in an adjacent state if invited by that state’s governor. The United States Coast Guard, which operates under the Department of Homeland Security, is not covered by the Posse Comitatus Act either, primarily because although the Coast Guard is an armed service, it also has both a maritime law enforcement mission and a federal regulatory agency mission.

The title of the act comes from the legal concept of Posse comitatus, the authority under which a county sheriff, or other law officer, conscripts any able-bodied man to assist him in keeping the peace.”



In closing, consider this: www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2016/05/15/twenty-year-old-un-plan-to-invade-the-us-found-in-newly-re-discovered-documents/

“The Bundy Ranch confrontation, along with many other unreported BLM land grabs on behalf of the Chinese are being carried out in preparation for a total resource hand off to the Chinese. My military sources and researcher, Vicky Davis tells me that a series of international “inland ports” are being created in conjunction with known mineral rich areas and control of these areas will be handed off to the Chinese. Further, the Chinese military will be stationed around these inland ports to ensure safety and security of the Chinese investment and its mining and geological personnel. The Chinese are doing this under the guise of creating solar energy, which they are. However, their energy companies are owned by the Chinese military. This will be the foothold of their invasion force. Further, solar zones are near planned international corridor highways (e.g. Canamex and NAFTA Super Highways) for easy transport of these soon-to-be mined mineral resources for shipping back to China. When the three pronged attack occurs, the American economy will be in chaos and the Chinese will be in the midst of acquiring vast mineral resources for which they have prepositioned their covert military assets in this country.

Chinese troops will soon be a common occurrence on American soil. This will constitute only the beginning of the short-range take over the Chinese have planned for America.

These Solar Energy Zones are appearing in multiple locations in such places as Southwestern Arizona, Barstow, CA. and Victorville, CA., and now I am receiving on the ground reports from Colorado and Utah as well. These designated Solar Energy Zones have very similar variables in common. The following chart indicates that the debt compensation will consist of complete control of the solar industry and will be expanded to other energy sources (e.g. hydroelectric and nuclear power). This practice has been happening in Indian reservations as well.”



And this: militaryhistorynow.com/2012/11/05/invasion-u-s-a-the-various-plans-to-conquer-america/

“A LUBBOCK TEXAS JUDGE made international headlines earlier this year for his prediction that if President Obama is reelected on Tuesday, it will open the door for a United Nations invasion of America.

Judge Tom Head told a local radio station in September that the president will: “Try to give the sovereignty of the United States away. He’s going to call in the UN troops, personnel carriers, tanks and whatever.”



Then we have this, which points out the US has no worries about being invaded…it just could not happen: ross-elder.com/2014/06/22/unthinkable-the-un-invasion-of-the-united-states/

“If you wanted to have a successful invasion and occupation of the United States, the smallest troop density level I would recommend would be 10/1,000. That would require 3.2 MILLION troops. Bear in mind that those should be combat forces. They will also need support troops to keep them supplied and patched up so they can stay in the fight. So, with a support to combat troop ratio of 3 to 1, which is very low, you would need more than 10 million troops. That’s on the low end.

To go the Russian route of inundating a region with forces, you would need 48 MILLION combat troops, not including support forces. The French approach, 19 MILLION combat troops without support forces. Taking the U.S.’s own advice in the Iraq war, a troop density ratio of 7.2 per 1,000 citizens, you still come up with more than 2.3 MILLION troops – without a support structure included.

Middle of the road estimate to invade and successfully occupy/stabilize these United States = 6.4 million combat troops plus support of approximately 18 million additional troops. THAT IS MORE THAN 24 MILLION TROOPS!

That ain’t happenin’, folks. Ever.

The truth of the matter is that there are several armored vehicle companies in the United States who manufacture, repair, and refit armored vehicles for numerous organizations around the world INCLUDING THE UNITED NATIONS. Also, when the U.S. participates in a U.N. Peacekeeping mission in places like the Sinai or Bosnia, they often need vehicles. I know I went through a lot of math in order to convince you that the assertion of a U.N. invasion is not only ludicrous, but unmanageable. I hate math but it was necessary so you could see the ridiculous nature of these assertions. Russia, China, and the EU combined do not possess the forces required to pacify and successfully occupy the United States, let alone a bunch of third world banana republics from the United Nations.

To top off my debunking, here are a few photos taken from websites of armored vehicle manufacturers here in the United States. They clearly show that the United Nations is one of their clients. Those vehicles have to be transported and delivered somehow. The company can’t just teleport the damned things across the ocean to their final destination. Most armored vehicles are moved by sea. If you live near an active port, it is likely that during your lifetime, if you sat there and watched, you will see a UN marked vehicle heading for its transport. I will leave you with these pictures to ponder.”









This man has only made me wonder more about the Deep State and their cooperation with the United Nations. Of course, the Deep State wants to see the United Nations takeover the United States. The Deep State is a part of the United Nations. They both are heads of the same snake which is the New World Order. As we see with the longevity of the MUNDO organization in Chicago, these things do not happen overnight. It takes years of planning, and I do not doubt for a minute a United Nations’ penetration into the US has been calculating and moving at a pace which would make none of us any wiser to its existance.