Queensland police have appealed for help with Indigenous "cultural sensitivities" in case mining firm Adani requests traditional owners be removed from its Galilee Basin project site.

Key points: The Queensland Government has extinguished native title over the Adani mine site

The Queensland Government has extinguished native title over the Adani mine site Traditional owners have set up a camp on state land due to be handed to Adani

Traditional owners have set up a camp on state land due to be handed to Adani Police are concerned about cultural sensitivities ahead of likely calls by Adani to intervene

Adani has also warned its opponents within the Wangan and Jagalingou people that it could take action against them for "trespass" on land that will form part of the Carmichael mine site.

It comes after the State Government quietly extinguished native title rights over 1,385 hectares of the mine site on Thursday.

A week ago, W&J man Adrian Burragubba, who the mining giant has bankrupted over costs from legal challenges, set up a camp with others on state land due to be handed over to Adani today.

After two Adani employees visited the camp this week, the Queensland police cultural engagement unit wrote to a native title services provider asking for help.

"It is likely that Adani will request the assistance of police to remove Mr Burragubba and his supporters from the camp," Acting Senior Sergeant David Lucas said.

"We are looking to resolve this issue allowing for cultural sensitivities and as such would like to speak to signatories of the ILUA [Indigenous Land Use Agreement with Adani] who may be able to assist us or appeal to Mr Adrian Burragubba."

Adani employees visited a traditional owner camp on the mine site on Tuesday. ( Supplied )

The same day, Adani wrote to Mr Burragubba to warn him he had "trespassed" on its Moray Downs property by entering "without Adani's prior consent".

"Adani does not grant you such consent," the company said in the letter.

"You … and all people accompanying you are required not to trespass on any area of the pastoral lease, nor on any other property occupied, owned or leased by Adani.

"Adani reserves all of its rights in relation to these matters."

The State Government has confirmed that 1,385 hectares of land, including the site of the camp set up by Mr Burragubba and others, was converted to freehold on Thursday.

That excludes that area from a W&J native title claim.

Mines and Natural Resources Minister Anthony Lynham said this was enabled by an ILUA that was "authorised by the native title claimants and registered by the National Native Title Tribunal almost two years ago".

Mr Burragubba and other W&J mine opponents argued Adani had a "sham agreement" but the full bench of the Federal Court upheld the ILUA last month.

He said they were "entitled to remain in occupation of our land" and were seeking legal advice on their rights.

"We are on our country because it's our common law native title right. We are occupying our ancestral lands as we have always done," Mr Burragubba said.

"We are the First Nations landowners, and our property rights must be treated with respect.

"We have stopped Adani for eight long years and we will keep fighting to ensure our ancestral lands are not destroyed by the actions of the Government and Adani."

Adrian Burragubba says traditional owners will keep fighting Adani. ( ABC News: Josh Robertson )

Adani is slated to use the land for its mine workers' camp, airport, telecommunications towers and industrial complex.

An Adani spokeswoman said the company had "deep respect for the traditions and customs of our traditional owners, particularly the Wangan and Jagalingou people".

"Should people choose to access our property in the future without first making a request to us, we will decide what action to take at the time depending on the circumstances," she said.

"The normal process for accessing any landholders' property sees a request made to the landholder to access the country in order to visit or undertake cultural ceremonies.

"This process was not undertaken on this occasion by Mr Burragubba, accordingly any movement on our land by Mr Burragubba or others is unauthorised.

"Like any other landholder, we have a responsibility to be aware of who is on our property, that they are kept safe, and accessing or traversing our property in a planned and orderly manner, especially considering there are farming activities in addition to construction activities currently being undertaken onsite."