For accidental admissions about how mainstream media minds work, there’s no more of a reliable source than CNN’s “Reliable Sources.” This weekend featured a journalist explaining why any chapters on objectivity should be ripped out of journalism school books and thrown away:

Reliable Sources guest @JuliaAngwin on the NYT covering Trump: "this idea of objectivity that we were all raised to follow is not working." pic.twitter.com/L0nlb6xpuu — Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) August 11, 2019

Well, there it is:

Again, I appreciate that they’re not trying to hide it anymore https://t.co/oZqwwBLEEs — Patrick Poole (@pspoole) August 11, 2019

“Reliable Sources” helps deliver the goods once again!

So, we can burn the J-schools to the ground and salt the earth they stand on. It's all propaganda and advocacy now. — Adso of Melk (@PalimpsestMan) August 11, 2019

CNN in a nutshell: https://t.co/81F1lgtOH3 — johnny dollar (@johnnydollar01) August 11, 2019

Raised to follow objectivity? You failed miserably damn! — Tom McMahon (@DV8NEscape) August 11, 2019

These journalists have a very strange definition of objectivity. https://t.co/HLZp6wiie0 — Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) August 11, 2019

We’re guessing that the DNC agrees with their definition of “objectivity.”

Here’s the bottom line if you’re keeping score at home:

"If objective journalism fails to produce the results you want then its ok to not be objective." — The Press https://t.co/AlMqRUhWix — Space Pirate Ninja Assassin ⚔️ Software Engineer (@nilgirian) August 12, 2019

And yet the media wonders where all the skepticism comes from.