Download raw source

Delivered-To: john.podesta@gmail.com Received: by 10.25.24.103 with SMTP id o100csp3604247lfi; Mon, 8 Jun 2015 07:33:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.13.206.129 with SMTP id q123mr16515241ywd.140.1433774030562; Mon, 08 Jun 2015 07:33:50 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <re47@hillaryclinton.com> Received: from mail-yh0-x232.google.com (mail-yh0-x232.google.com. [2607:f8b0:4002:c01::232]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h3si1225115yhb.65.2015.06.08.07.33.49 for <john.podesta@gmail.com> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Jun 2015 07:33:50 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of re47@hillaryclinton.com designates 2607:f8b0:4002:c01::232 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4002:c01::232; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of re47@hillaryclinton.com designates 2607:f8b0:4002:c01::232 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=re47@hillaryclinton.com; dkim=pass header.i=@hillaryclinton.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=hillaryclinton.com Received: by mail-yh0-x232.google.com with SMTP id k3so35872948yha.2 for <john.podesta@gmail.com>; Mon, 08 Jun 2015 07:33:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hillaryclinton.com; s=google; h=from:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EVtqHIGrYutYS5/lDnLBh/NaTLRGogTDDl/mIK79STQ=; b=hXqWw8+5sCAoGFyn5ql6MpzZEdnCknTce7iyIoYqOHNpbyTPoTlpoNGcdTciMdDtqb 015yZOZoOxU6hqvEveVtnw26EQvsuvoTefBNkBIo1VFj04/cFlqWIK/aiSMH63HgXicS K4tqIfEDt8JQe6wE4gDhpZgK6gOZuAgnhoOZs= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EVtqHIGrYutYS5/lDnLBh/NaTLRGogTDDl/mIK79STQ=; b=Cf+MQbZEvCSX4fP8ospbfdO/tBzjXxoSEwpVOj5F0KDtZ4xTADcLUCC94S5HM0Cm8e daT9SEnIBNdrt44xHRmXeCuSdZIv6Zr8TFXfdp2Gszbj/qAceE2e/P4fgSQrpADQR/Bv BSMoDN0u61PYZjQBqmVBn7keK900Ph7t85bPri8v2RXS9EfwbfBEzqDeb2l7vUhZQmEX 4i4GKMftB3VCv6xPVdXKy3vQ0VQ8Fh7OtQG9rNkt5OUMy9rO4iCbrW4DYR/pRLeV8qmx mjjwZ5uBxYCJpHIjY+8TrQTOoqlJuXgU/KIZWjocrJ9uLqjfnFXeGik51qMnXxPpRRpY WHZA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmP4KVVZ62Sd7WDCPgAd+XbBzpKGTCLVG8DhpRXjOn/AZZgfQSkppItvj1HHwHFrxtQ0+I2 X-Received: by 10.170.189.77 with SMTP id g74mr18831920yke.4.1433774029803; Mon, 08 Jun 2015 07:33:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Robby Mook <re47@hillaryclinton.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) References: <CAAEwKfwT=ZNNMAuH2vq7aRp1Kzd_0XT7vOM9D4x=kpM2uX3hQQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAAEwKfwT=ZNNMAuH2vq7aRp1Kzd_0XT7vOM9D4x=kpM2uX3hQQ@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 10:30:24 -0400 Message-ID: <-759296251750132161@unknownmsgid> Subject: Re: HRC reactions To: Dan Schwerin <dschwerin@hillaryclinton.com> CC: Jennifer Palmieri <jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com>, Kristina Schake <kschake@hillaryclinton.com>, John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com>, Huma Abedin <ha16@hillaryclinton.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I just talked w her as well. Can this smaller group get on a call before noon to discuss next steps? I take off at noon to go back to DC. > On Jun 8, 2015, at 10:11 AM, Dan Schwerin <dschwerin@hillaryclinton.com> = wrote: > > HRC just called me and expressed a fair amount of frustration with how th= ings are going. She said we've given a series of very good policy speeches= and in between we just keep giving her poll-tested lines that don't work, = like make the middle class mean something. She emphatically did not want to= lose the Four Fights, or at least a similar construction, and the link to = Four Freedoms, saying she picked this location for a reason and the Four Fi= ghts is the one thing she feels like is actually working out there on the t= rail -- oh, and by the way, she had to come up with it herself because we d= idn't give her anything better. Also, she prefers "our time" to "your time= " and agrees that we need to build a stronger scaffolding for "unlocking po= tential" if its going to mean anything to people. And she's eager to see t= he next draft. > > I am working on that now, along the lines we discussed on our call last n= ight. I think I can probably graft on a light "four fights" structure onto = the second half without actually changing much at all. The front half is t= he challenge as was evident on the call last night when there was still so = little consensus. But i'm hopeful that rearranging the order, as Robby sugg= ested, can help us get there.