There are two possible ways to interpret these factually incorrect statements: either they’re an outright, direct lie or they are reckless misinformation being forwarded as fact without fact checking. In either case, they’re guilty of slander. There’s a reason actual journalistic outlets fact check and offer retractions.

These are some of the absurd claims that have proven to be patently false upon even moderate inspection, yet they’re still being used to slander these people to this very day. These kind of baseless accusations are ruining peoples lives and invading their privacy.

Nevermind the incredibly bizarre preoccupation with people like Sarkeesian, Wu, and Quinn who have absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with journalism.