Over 7000 votes cast (according to the stats displayed on the link you provided), not to mention the incredible feeling of community involvement felt on the original logo thread. And that's Team Kodi's response? Wow.



I don't particularly agree with the top results in terms of viable logos, but I do respect the time taken by everyone who submitted a logo idea (and the number of responses those ideas garnered.) - but that's what you get with a community vote (especially one that was geared towards picking the best visual design, not the best logo.) And most projects would kill for such community involvement that gains 7000+ votes. (Take a look at Universal's thread requesting a new logo to see what I mean.) Again - wow.



Edit: I've just re-read this, and realise it can be misinterpreted. My issue isn't with how Ned Scott represented the attitude being displayed by the team towards the logo votes, but the attitude itself. Even if I don't personally agree with the top logos, or how the vote was conducted, these ARE the logos the community has decided upon. To ignore these after going to the trouble of asking for such feedback (And the sense of community actually asking encouraged, not to mention the amount of responses both the logo thread and the vote itself garnered), well, Wow.