RejZoR Ubisoft is about as bad option as EA. Activision is probably the best option, even though they have shit policies and pricings.

WHATActivision over Ubisoft? Where have you been the past five years? Ubisoft is only getting better with every release since AC:Unity and Activision gets progressively worse with each CoD. Both in business model and game. Also, Ubisoft isn't really a franchise killer, if anything they over-do it or drag it out longer than it should - Heroes of Might and Magic is a prime example of that.Destiny - nuff said. You don't want this; its one of the biggest scams in gaming history, except people fail to see this as they do with EA's lootbox fiesta. Game 1: 'we have a 10 year plan and 100 million dollar budget for this game, it will be expanded as we go along' (releases with a handful of small maps and fully instanced instead of the 'massive online' experience it was portrayed to be). Game 2: 'we still have a 10 year plan, but we decided to divvy up the game in 3 parts OH and yes, screw you because basically you get a reset for each sequel' (suddenly its a CoD clone WITH MTX and gated progression, but with limited lifetime, how's that gonna work??). Game 3? Who knows, if sales suck it might be a mobile app - whatever, you're guaranteed to start over once again anyway.I get the sentiment because of Ubi's past, but the last couple of years literally every single adjustment they have made both in-game and in business models has been sound, has helped the game get better, and has solidified the community around each game. Whether its Rainbow Six, GR:W, The Division, even AC is in good shape now except for the DRM.No really, the only good thing about Activision, is Blizzard, and that is only true because Blizzard still has a say over its own portfolio and business.