1. Van Mantgem, P. J. et al. Widespread increase of tree mortality rates in the western United States. Science 323, 521–524 (2009).

2. Allen, C. D. et al. A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 259, 660–684 (2010).

3. Settele, J. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability (eds Field, C. B. et al.) 271–359 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2015).

4. McDowell, N. G. et al. Evaluating theories of drought-induced vegetation mortality using a multimodel-experiment framework. New Phytol. 200, 304–321 (2013).

5. Parolari, A. J., Katul, G. G. & Porporato, A. An ecohydrological perspective on drought-induced forest mortality. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 119, 965–981 (2014).

6. Liu, Y. et al. Increasing atmospheric humidity and CO 2 concentration alleviate forest mortality risk. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 9918–9923 (2017).

7. Adams, H. D. et al. Temperature sensitivity of drought-induced tree mortality portends increased regional die-off under global-change-type drought. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 7063–7066 (2009).

8. Anderegg, L. D. L., Anderegg, W. R. L., Abatzoglou, J., Hausladen, A. M. & Berry, J. A. Drought characteristics’ role in widespread aspen forest mortality across Colorado, USA. Glob. Change Biol. 19, 1526–1537 (2013).

9. Anderegg, W. R. et al. Tree mortality predicted from drought-induced vascular damage. Nat. Geosci. 8, 367–371 (2015).

10. McDowell, N. G. Mechanisms linking drought, hydraulics, carbon metabolism, and vegetation mortality. Plant Physiol. 155, 1051–1059 (2011).

11. McDowell, N. G. et al. The interdependence of mechanisms underlying climate-driven vegetation mortality. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 523–532 (2011).

12. Clark, J. S. et al. The impacts of increasing drought on forest dynamics, structure, and biodiversity in the United States. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 2329–2352 (2016).

13. Wolf, A., Anderegg, W. R. & Pacala, S. W. Optimal stomatal behavior with competition for water and risk of hydraulic impairment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E7222–E7230 (2016).

14. Sala, A., Piper, F. & Hoch, G. Physiological mechanisms of drought-induced tree mortality are far from being resolved. New Phytol. 186, 274–281 (2010).

15. Choat, B. et al. Triggers of tree mortality under drought. Nature 558, 531–539 (2018).

16. Young, D. J. et al. Long-term climate and competition explain forest mortality patterns under extreme drought. Ecol. Lett. 20, 78–86 (2017).

17. Scheffer, M. et al. Early-warning signals for critical transitions. Nature 461, 53–59 (2009).

18. van Nes, E. H. et al. What do you mean, ‘tipping point’? Trends Ecol. Evol. 31, 902–904 (2016).

19. Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S., Foley, J. A., Folke, C. & Walker, B. Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413, 591–596 (2001).

20. Kéfi, S., Dakos, V., Scheffer, M., Van Nes, E. H. & Rietkerk, M. Early warning signals also precede non-catastrophic transitions. Oikos 122, 641–648 (2013).

21. Verbesselt, J. et al. Remotely sensed resilience of tropical forests. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 1028–1031 (2016).

22. Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S. R., Dakos, V. & van Nes, E. H. Generic indicators of ecological resilience: inferring the chance of a critical transition. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 46, 145–167 (2015).

23. Dakos, V. et al. Slowing down as an early warning signal for abrupt climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 14308–14312 (2008).

24. Dakos, V., Carpenter, S. R., van Nes, E. H. & Scheffer, M. Resilience indicators: prospects and limitations for early warnings of regime shifts. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 370, 20130263 (2015).

25. Ives, A. R. & Dakos, V. Detecting dynamical changes in nonlinear time series using locally linear state-space models. Ecosphere 3, 1–15 (2012).

26. Dakos, V. et al. Methods for detecting early warnings of critical transitions in time series illustrated using simulated ecological data. PLoS ONE 7, e41010 (2012).

27. US Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region Forest Health Protection Aerial Detection Survey (US Forest Service, accessed 25 September 2017); https://www.fs.usda.gov/detail/r5/forest-grasslandhealth

28. Swann, A. L. et al. Continental-scale consequences of tree die-offs in North America: identifying where forest loss matters most. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 055014 (2018).

29. Breshears, D. D. et al. Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15144–15148 (2005).

30. Brodrick, P. & Asner, G. Remotely sensed predictors of conifer tree mortality during severe drought. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 115013 (2017).

31. Dai, A., Trenberth, K. E. & Qian, T. A global dataset of Palmer drought severity index for 1870–2002: relationship with soil moisture and effects of surface warming. J. Hydrometeorol. 5, 1117–1130 (2004).

32. Limousin, J.-M. et al. Morphological and phenological shoot plasticity in a Mediterranean evergreen oak facing long-term increased drought. Oecologia 169, 565–577 (2012).

33. Gaylord, M. L. et al. Drought predisposes piñon-juniper woodlands to insect attacks and mortality. New Phytol. 198, 567–578 (2013).

34. Mueller, R. C. et al. Differential tree mortality in response to severe drought: evidence for long-term vegetation shifts. J. Ecol. 93, 1085–1093 (2005).

35. McDowell, N. et al. Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? New Phytol. 178, 719–739 (2008).

36. Munné-Bosch, S. & Alegre, L. Die and let live: leaf senescence contributes to plant survival under drought stress. Funct. Plant Biol. 31, 203–216 (2004).

37. Tai, X., Mackay, D. S., Anderegg, W. R., Sperry, J. S. & Brooks, P. D. Plant hydraulics improves and topography mediates prediction of aspen mortality in southwestern USA. New Phytol. 213, 113–127 (2017).

38. Prado, R. & West, M. Time Series: Modeling, Computation, and Inference (CRC, 2010).

39. Vicente-Serrano, S. M. et al. Response of vegetation to drought time-scales across global land biomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 52–57 (2013).

40. Novick, K., Katul, G., McCarthy, H. & Oren, R. Increased resin flow in mature pine trees growing under elevated CO 2 and moderate soil fertility. Tree Physiol. 32, 752–763 (2012).

41. Camarero, J. J., Gazol, A., Sangüesa-Barreda, G., Oliva, J. & Vicente-Serrano, S. M. To die or not to die: early warnings of tree dieback in response to a severe drought. J. Ecol. 103, 44–57 (2015).

42. Cailleret, M. et al. A synthesis of radial growth patterns preceding tree mortality. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 1675–1690 (2017).

43. Anderegg, W. R., Anderegg, L. D. & Huang, C.-y Testing early warning metrics for drought-induced tree physiological stress and mortality. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 2459–2469 (2019).

44. Rogers, B. M. et al. Detecting early warning signals of tree mortality in boreal North America using multiscale satellite data. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 2284–2304 (2018).

45. Schwalm, C. R. et al. Global patterns of drought recovery. Nature 548, 202–205 (2017).

46. Walther, S. et al. Satellite chlorophyll fluorescence measurements reveal large-scale decoupling of photosynthesis and greenness dynamics in boreal evergreen forests. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 2979–2996 (2016).

47. Churchill, D. J. et al. Restoring forest resilience: from reference spatial patterns to silvicultural prescriptions and monitoring. For. Ecol. Manage. 291, 442–457 (2013).

48. Hessburg, P. F. et al. Tamm review: management of mixed-severity fire regime forests in Oregon, Washington, and Northern California. For. Ecol. Manage. 366, 221–250 (2016).

49. Trumbore, S., Brando, P. & Hartmann, H. Forest health and global change. Science 349, 814–818 (2015).

50. Landsat 7 ETM+ Surface Reflectance (US Geological Survey, accessed 21 July 2017); https://landsat.usgs.gov/landsat-surface-reflectance-data-products

51. Hansen, M. C. et al. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342, 850–853 (2013).

52. MODIS Active Fire Detections for the CONUS (2002–2015) (US Forest Service, accessed 13 September 2017); https://fsapps.nwcg.gov/afm/gisdata.php

53. Thornton, P. et al. Daymet: Daily Surface Weather Data on a 1-km Grid for North America Version 3 (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, accessed 15 September 2017); https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1328

54. Abatzoglou, J. T. Development of gridded surface meteorological data for ecological applications and modelling. Int. J. Climatol. 33, 121–131 (2013).

55. GNN Structure (Species-Size) Maps (LEMMA Group, accessed 4 December 2017); http://lemma.forestry.oregonstate.edu/data/structure-maps

56. Existing Vegetation–CALVEG (US Forest Service, accessed 7 October 2017); https://www.fs.usda.gov/main/r5/landmanagement/gis

57. West, M. & Harrison, J. Bayesian Forecasting and Dynamic Models (Springer, 1997).

58. Finley, A., Banerjee, S. & Gelfand, A. spBayes for large univariate and multivariate point–referenced spatio-temporal data models. J. Stat. Softw. 63, 1–28 (2015).

59. R Core Team R Version 3.4.3: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2017).

60. Gelfand, A. E., Banerjee, S. & Gamerman, D. Spatial process modelling for univariate and multivariate dynamic spatial data. Environmetrics 16, 465–479 (2005).