Eric Striker

Daily Stormer

October 5, 2016

The Striker Theory of political science posits that whenever a third nationalist force arises, communists and capitalists unite to try and crush it, thus revealing who they really are. This is something important to bring up to Leftists or conservatives, who play-fight in the public square, but are actually just subsidiaries of the same plutocratic money-power based in New York, London, and other Western capitals (ever wonder why Churchill never declared war on the USSR for “violating the sovereignty of Poland” at about the same time as Germany?). I don’t think Donald Trump is the messiah, but it speaks volumes that the publication of the Communist Party USA and the “ultra-conservative” San Diego Union-Tribune (which has endorsed every Republican nominee since 1868) have put aside every last one of their claimed principles and supposed differences to try and use their non-existent clout as a way to propel Wall Street crony, imperialist war mongering, abortion loving Hillary Clinton into office. Any self-reflecting communist or conservative reading these endorsements should immediately become suspicious.

Even more startling is the fact that in the United States, a nation of 319 million people claiming to have “freedom of the press,” not one newspaper has endorsed the Republican nominee. In “deep red” Texas all of the cohenservative papers so far, big and small, have affirmed Clinton as their choice. The push against Trump by the press is so transparent and organized that even Gary Johnson of the Marijuana Party has been able to scrape together five newspaper endorsements from “respected” editorial boards, something the Washington Post has gloated about in their cookie-cutter hit piece on the subject.

USA Today has joined the dog pile, though they tried to do it in a legalistic manner by “disendorsing Trump” so that they can keep pretending to be some paradigm of neutrality (the only other time they have tried to instruct their readers how to vote was during David Duke’s 1991 Senate campaign). In their announcement “Trump Is Unfit For The Presidency,” USA Today writes:

In the 34-year history of USA TODAY, the Editorial Board has never taken sides in the presidential race. Instead, we’ve expressed opinions about the major issues and haven’t presumed to tell our readers, who have a variety of priorities and values, which choice is best for them. Because every presidential race is different, we revisit our no-endorsement policy every four years. We’ve never seen reason to alter our approach. Until now. This year, the choice isn’t between two capable major party nominees who happen to have significant ideological differences. This year, one of the candidates — Republican nominee Donald Trump — is, by unanimous consensus of the Editorial Board, unfit for the presidency.

Mathematically speaking, if you were to go up to 10 janitors, to 10 doctors, to 10 cab drivers, to 10 high school teachers, to 10 people from any group or walk of life, you will find at least one person who will vote for Donald Trump– the only exception is in what we are trained to believe is the vehicle for the vox populi: journalists. Somehow, we are expected to believe that the ideas that resonate with at least half of the voting population (Trump and Hillary are tied or Trump is ahead in daily tracking polls) are not shared by even one member of the editorial board overseen by Jewish agitprop commissar Bill Sternberg . None of them concur with half of America, and this is supposed to be a big coincidence.

It’s an open secret that the editors and owners of America’s most “influential” publications are Jews, but this does not explain why of 1400 papers in circulation serving communities of all types and political persuasions, many are risking mass subscription cancellation in order to endorse Hillary or some other strategy to try and chip away at Trump votes. The secret here is that while Jews may not personally control every bit of content put out by the editorial boards of publications like The Dallas Morning News, they still go along with the party lines established in New York City and Washington DC either due to dependence on (often fickle) grants and donors (usually of a certain (((persuasion))) ), or they have been bought out in the last decade or more by one of the major corporate monopolies. According to the fairly authoritative study featured in the book The News Media: What Everyone Needs to Know by C.W. Anderson, Leonard Downie Jr, et al, advertisement revenues have fallen by 40% in the last decade, while the massive collapse of subscriptions to daily newspapers is common knowledge.

In other words, journalists are cherry picked for their ideology (even though it’s support for globalism and open borders that is the minority, fringe opinion among every day Americans), or their ability to dispense an ideological rationale for whatever private or racial agenda their donors have. That is why the “flagship conservative publication” the National Review peddles nothing but Trump hit-pieces and calls for white people with a household income beneath theirs to die, all while the same authors proclaim that Jews are a master race! The National Review runs racist cartoons caricaturing Southern whites with grotesquely exaggerated Celtic features like red hair, slack jaws, and unrealistically pointy noises, like the one below drawn by the Kike Roman Genn, all while admonishing publications with far more readers like the Daily Stormer for portraying Jews with big hooked noses and kinky hair.

Racist Meme used by the National Review to Mock and Degrade White Southerners

Now that our system is undergoing a transitional stage, the truth has been able to peek out through the brick wall, and more and more people are joining our ranks. The only reason our media freely mocks, attacks, libels and encourages to kill us, while calling us showing Jews the mirror reflection of themselves “hate speech” is that they have money and power and we don’t. We have a chance to change this.

Whether Trump is a useless sack of shit who falls in line after he’s elected or not, his major contribution to the ongoing cultural revolution is simple: America is not a free country. We already knew virtually all publications allowed to have any degree of circulation were controlled by our enemies, but did the Texas cowboy know that when he got up to read his beloved Dallas Morning News, an entity that duped him into supporting the war in Iraq or taught him that neo-liberalism is “real conservatism,” came out and raised the flag for Hillary?

Nope. But now he can see there’s something fishy going on. That was the hard part, now it’s our time to give him the answers.