The Sun has been pretty good to us here on Earth over the last billion or so years. Sure we get the occasional solar storm and some deviations from ideal temperatures. But, by and large, we have a relatively supportive parent star. It’s nothing like those poor planets that orbit the star Kronos (HD 240430), located some 350 light-years away.On September 15, a team of Princeton astronomers posted a paper on the physics pre-print site arXiv.org that argues the star Kronos devoured over a dozen of its rocky inner planets during the course of its 4 billion year lifetime. However, its companion star, Krios (HD 240429), has managed to avoid feasting on its own solid worlds.The lead author of the study, Semyeong Oh, explained in a press release that Kronos — named after the mythological Greek Titan who ate his own children — is the most obvious and dramatic example yet of a Sun-like star consuming its own planets. And, “because [Kronos] has a stellar companion to compare it to, it makes the case a little stronger,” she said.Initially, Oh and her team were not trying to find a planet-eating star and its thin twin. Instead, they were using new stellar data collected by the European Space Agency’s Gaia spacecraft to simply identify co-moving stars that formed together from the same materials around the same time.

NASA/JPL-Caltech/R. Hurt (SSC-Caltech)

When they went to present their research at a Flatiron Institute meeting, a postdoctoral researcher from Yale University named John Brewer proposed they pool their data with his. “John suggested that maybe we should cross-match my co-moving catalogue with his chemical-abundance catalogue, because its interesting to ask whether they have the same compositions,” Oh said. That’s when they noticed that Kronos and Krios have vastly different chemical makeups.



While Kronos and Krios have about the same amount of volatile elements — those that are typically found in gas form — Kronos has a strikingly high amount of rock-forming minerals, such as iron, aluminum, silicon, and magnesium. According to Oh, most stars that are as metal-rich as Kronos “have all the other elements enhanced at a similar level, whereas Kronos has volatile elements suppressed, which makes it really weird in the general context of stellar abundance patterns.”



After carefully verifying the data was accurate, the team set out to determine what had caused this discrepancy in composition between Kronos and Krios. Could the stars have formed their planetary disks at different times? Unlikely based on their age. Maybe the two stars were not always co-moving and swapped partners at some point? Oh performed a straightforward calculation to disprove this theory.



The answer finally struck Oh when she started plotting chemical abundance as a function of condensation temperature — the temperature at which volatiles form into solids. She quickly noticed that Kronos was lacking every element that solidifies below 1,700 Fahrenheit, while it was rich in elements that form solids at higher temperatures.



“All of the elements that would make up a rocky planet are exactly the elements that are enhanced on Kronos, and the volatile elements are not enhanced,” Oh said, “so that provides a strong argument for a planet engulfment scenario, instead of something else.” In order for Kronos to be this metal-rich while lacking many volatiles, Oh and her team calculated the star would need to gobble up roughly 15 Earth-mass planets.

