So, when the jury deadlocked on the rape charges, concluding that the actual victim who was actually being raped was mistaken or terribly terribly confused about what was being done to her at gunpoint and instead took the RAPIST's version of events as fact, they were... what? I don't understand. Were they wrong to take a RAPIST's word over the victim's? What possible motive could they have had to believe a rapist over the victim who was being raped? This is so confusing to me. I am beside myself with an unidentifiable emotion. Maybe there's a foreign word for it. I don't know.

You know I know that the jury is doing their civic duty and everyone thanks them for their service, but that jury sucked. And it should apologize to the victim. And parts of it shoudl be docked their minisule per deim and then they should be publically shamed for five minutes. At least.

Also, I wouldl like to hear what the prosecuting attorney thinks of this shitty fucking human being of a defense attorney. Trying to get a lesser sentence on the other conviction through the back door like some scheming scum.

When he got the conviction of predatory assualt he assured all the people (and the victim) that while he couldn't get a conviction on the rape charges, this was a more severe crime so would carry a much longer sentence, and now the defense atty is trying to outmanoever him. I would like to hear what he has to say about this turn of events.