Willowhugger said: The problem is, fundamentally, Eredin is a coward. He sends an army of soldiers to hunt after Ciri since she's fifteen years old and intends to impregnate her by force.



That kind of character doesn't deserve any sort of respect.



He deserves to die like he did, as an animal.



Sadly, like Radovid, there's no real way to link the character of the Witcher 1 with the one of Wild Hunt because their fundamentals are too different. Click to expand...

Tangsta said: Can't believe the nonsense surrounding 'lack of' Triss content. Seriously, she was heavily featured in two entire games before Witcher 3 and people still rage about there not being enough Triss content. Meanwhile, the 3rd most important character in this game, Eredin, continues to be overlooked.



I would've thought lack of Wild Hunt content in a game called 'The WILD HUNT' would be a far more obvious and pressing problem to resolve, but no, romancing Triss is more important... Click to expand...

Eredin is not a coward though, he is a king, he may have gotten paranoid over a certain white frost but did you see him cower in fear when it was time to fight? He has a lot to lose if he dies and he is a general at the same time, the future of his race depends on him in his eyes so he sees himself dying first in a melee fight to be a stupid idea (which it is).I have the same view, the forum lately has gotten ridiculous, I don't know if the hardcore community I used to see either left or the new fanbase is (and I do mean this as respectfully as possibly) mostly new fans coming over from Bioware's fans that played only W2 and W3, because from what I have personally seen, the new fanbase does not care what the old one used to care about (a damn good story that makes sense and is consistent).