Starting off an article with a dictionary definition is somewhat of a tired trope, as is ending one with a quote; although sometimes sticking to convention is a boon:

“Small minds discuss people; average minds discuss events; great minds discuss people,” — so said Eleanor Roosevelt. A powerful reminder that certain subjects have merit and others, well, they fill gaps that should otherwise be reserved for topics that can better “Peoplekind.”

Universities rely on the money they raise from tuition, alumni donations and sponsors with business affiliates, turning them into legacy funds more than centres for scholarly inquiry, with professors as the Trust Fund babies. Settled and comfortably tethered in tenure, professors — like Evangelists in a Mega Church, whose rhetoric swells with every donation vicariously couching them — easily disseminate their beliefs from a classroom that swiftly becomes a pulpit.

To a professor, their situation is distinctly Marxist in its setup (despite Capitalism being the feeding hand they wish to bite off). The university and its staff are the State, the State treats all students as an equal and a steady succession of impressionable young minds fed through institutional indoctrination apparatus, have churned out minds warped by Social Justice for more than a generation at this point. The spores of such mould infect journalism, media, arts, law and politics, deepening in teaching as the fundamentalist feedback loop grows to a screech that we see now at Evergreen, Mizzou, DePaul and even Yale!

However, the mind of an older adolescent or young adult has more agency than ideologues would like. A mind grows more discerning with age and a popular phrase sums it up: “A man who is not a liberal at sixteen has no heart; a man who is not a Conservative at sixty has no head.” The more pithy variant of that aforementioned phrase was attributed to ninteenth century British Prime Minister, Benjamin Disraeli, though many are credited with coining the term. So like all cults, the Social Justice, feminists/communists have altered their plan, to pervert minds when young; as Sunday Schools do at church, “progressives” now implement in everyday schools.

Britain’s original commercial broadcaster, ITV, air an investigative journalism programme called “The Tonight Show” once a week. Showing what’s coming on next week’s edition, the show features an investigation into the myriad slew of genders that are now in use throughout modern campuses and the far-left. The edition seemingly showed a trans woman primary school teacher that had all of the gender non-conforming gender pronouns stuck over the class walls. When the journalist asks the teacher what she would say to the people who says: “it’s just boy and girl?” The teacher replies: “I would tell them to get with the programme.”

‘Programme’ is the operative word here. Cultists seek to twist the minds of people the younger they are and the gender is a social construct argument roots deeply into feminist dogma. The idea also tells much without meaning to over feminist fears and weaknesses regarding their sex and gender identity. For decades, feminism has created a narrative that places women as the victim, the proletariat, and cast feminity as divine. Meanwhile, Patriarchy feminists tar with being perpetrating bigoted violence, bourgeois and the Satanic that only Feminism can eradicate, masculinity dubbed ‘toxic’ as though it is corrosive to decency, humanity and civility, possibly life itself.

However, by proselytising others and teaching them women are weak servants of evil males, a form of osmosis takes place. The proselytisers absorb their party line on some level and eventually start to believe that being a woman, being heterosexual, is actually a weakness and empowerment becomes entitlement. So the feeling that they too are entitled to the power they perceive the Patriarcy to have, seek to abolish both masculinity and feminity in a cynical power grab. The aim to blend all as non-gender conforming, non-cishet drones under the auspices of feminism is scarily communist in its ideal that even Stalin might have given pause at this endgame!