19% weight

White paper - The white paper is simple and accurate. The amount and time spent on developing various components are both logical and within reasons - A commendable job indeed. The team has invested 2.5 million US$ which is also a positive trend. The partnerships are credible and provides a strong base to launch from. But although there is an adequate level of information for any investor in all the aspects including liquidity, advantages, etc it lacks specifics. For example - How much % of profit would be shared? Which are the exchanges they want to launch in? They acknowledge they would get listed in an exchange first and then expand.



Team - An eight member team with an illustrious advisory committee is quite commendable. But, I hope this is actually not the case since no matter the capabilities of each team member, such a small core-team is incapable of pulling such a huge project off by itself. Clarifications?



Tokenomics - The tokenomics revolves around a unique sense of Utility token with a share of profit as dividend from both earning and real estate. It would have been much easier to do the fundraising using Equity token and a secondary coin for the internal platform use. Both the token distribution and fund allocation is within reasonable limit.



Business Model - The business model is kind of okey since they have a lot of components built for the platform which they are leveraging. But it lacks clarity in terms of future business development plans on global scale. The fundraising looks more like a way of raising capital but the amount of profit share with investors is still in the dark.



MVP/ DApp/ Working Product - The positive things about this project is its multiple working components.



Note - Please update the whole team and partnership details with exchanges (if any)/ partners. Clarify the further about investor benefits in details (Its quite vague at present).

Agree

0